Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/05/29 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionCity Council Study Session May 29, 2007 6:30 PM Council Chambers Discussion Items Councilmember Sanger Out. Approximate Times 1. 6:30 p.m. Future Agenda Planning 2. 6:35 p.m. Proposed Crime Free Rental Housing Program 3. 7:20 p.m. Police Incident and Other City Info Mapping 4. 7:40 p.m. Solid Waste Program 5. 8:10 p.m. 2008 Budget Process 6. 8:25 p.m. Protocol for Council Communications Written Reports 7. Community Event Guidelines 8. Financial Reports (April 2007) 9. License Renewal Process for Delinquent Taxes and Accounts 10. Park WiFi Update 11. Anti-Graffiti Program 8:45 p.m. Adjourn Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administrative Services Department at (952) 924-2525 (TDD (952) 924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 1 - Future Study Session Agenda Page 1 1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning Administrative Services PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION: To assist the City Council and the City Manager in setting the next study session agenda. BACKGROUND: At each study session, approximately five minutes are set aside to discuss the next study session agenda. For this purpose, attached please find the tentative agenda and proposed discussion items for the study session on June 11. Attachment: Future Study Session Agenda Planning Prepared by: Marcia Honold, Management Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 1 - Future Study Session Agenda Page 2 Future Study Session Agenda Planning Monday, June 11, 2007 – 5:30 p.m. Canoe Ride with the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission, Minnehaha Creek Tentative Discussion Items -7:30 p.m., Box Lunches A. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – Administrative Services (5 minutes) B. Park & Recreation Commission Annual Report & Work Plan – Park & Recreation (15 minutes) The Commissioners and staff liaisons will discuss the revised 2006 Annual Report and the 2007 Work Plan with Council. Council will provide feedback to the Commissioners. C. Off Leash Dog Park – Park & Recreation (15 minutes). Does Council want staff to proceed with a public process to locate a second, permanent off leash dog park in St. Louis Park? D. EDI Business Points – Community Development (30 minutes) Council and staff will review the terms of the EDI redevelopment agreement business points. Should staff proceed with finalizing the agreement and preparing it for EDA action? Reports • Tobacco Penalties – Administrative Services 8:35 p.m. End of Meeting St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 2 - Crime Free Rental Housing Program Page 1 2. Proposed Crime Free Rental Housing Program Inspections and Police PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION: Staff is requesting direction on whether to proceed with bringing to the City Council for formal consideration (first reading) the attached draft ordinance establishing a crime free rental housing program. BACKGROUND: As staff discussed with Council during its study session on January 8, 2007, the city has over 7,000 multi-family rental units in over 300 buildings and over 600 1 & 2 family rental (non- owner occupied) units. Each rental building is licensed annually and must be maintained in compliance with the Property Maintenance Code as a condition of the license. A property maintenance inspection by staff occurs every 2-3 years. Of growing concern is the incidence of public nuisance and criminal activity occurring in some rental properties. Police records indicate a higher incidence of repeat calls to some rental units for a variety of activities. During two, four-month periods over the last year, of the 10 most frequently visited single family homes, an average of half were rental units. This is significant as only five percent of our single family homes are non-owner occupied rentals. While this number represents all types of calls including criminal, assistance, nuisance, and medical, the Police have observed a problem with tenant behavior in certain rental units. Multi-unit buildings also reflect a similar situation. Of the approximately 3400 criminal calls the Police responded to during the year, less then one percent occurred from ~1500 owner occupied condominiums/townhouses and 15% occurred from ~7000 apartments. This data helps support the concerns that our Police are observing in the community. Similar concerns have resulted in crime-free rental provisions being adopted in several other cities including Burnsville, Mounds View, Brooklyn Park, Minneapolis, and are under consideration in Hopkins. During the January 8 study session staff outlined possible concepts for a crime free rental ordinance. Council expressed support for staff to develop such an ordinance for Council consideration. Staff was also asked to undertake a public process with the owners and managers of the rental community to receive their feedback. ANALYSIS: Rental homes and apartments are unique compared to their owner occupied equivalent. Rental buildings are licensed as a business. If a license holder lives out of the city, becomes unconcerned with the community welfare, or is lacking knowledge on how to properly operate crime free rental property, the business may have an undesirable effect on the quality of life in the city. The City Code currently does not provide any tools to effectively help prevent or resolve behavior concerns which may develop and continue in rental properties. Developing a Crime Free Rental Housing program as an enhancement to the business license requirements in section 8-326, will benefit neighboring tenants, property owners, and general welfare of the community. Ignored criminal and nuisance activity can quickly escalate, consuming additional city resources and effecting quality of life. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 2 - Crime Free Rental Housing Program Page 2 Over 900 current rental license holders were invited to attend open houses over the past months to assist in developing an effective and reasonable program. Additional meetings with the St. Louis Park Rental Coalition (SPARC) and the Minnesota Multi Housing Association (MHA) with their St. Louis Park members have also occurred. During these meetings staff identified the city perspective of the problem and outlined the proposed crime free program. The owners shared the difficulties they are currently experiencing and clarified what we can do better to improve our service to assist them. DRAFT ORDINANCE SUMMARY: Attached is the draft ordinance as reviewed by City Attorney Tom Scott. Amending the rental licensing section is intended to enhance our rental licensing program by combining minimum regulatory components, education and performance criteria as a condition of licensing. The following outlines and summarizes the significant program components proposed in the ordinance: Education • Licensee required to utilize a tenant lease with code specified crime free/drug free and disorderly use language included. A lease addendum with the required language may be substituted when the licensee chooses not to modify there base lease agreements. The crime free/drug free and disorderly use conditions of the lease provide notice to the tenant that certain actions and behavior are grounds for termination of the lease. New tenants entering into leases beginning January 1, 2008 would need to have this language in their lease. Existing tenants would be required to have the language integrated into their lease during the normal lease renewal rotation, not to exceed January 1, 2009. • Licensee or identified property manager must attend or have previously attended the Crime Free Housing Program training provided by participating Police Departments. Currently voluntary, this extensive eight-hour training provides owners and managers information on what they can do to help maintain safe housing. The SLP Police Department offers this training at various times for a cost of $25. Mandatory training would establish a consistent baseline for information and promote a continuing and expanding partnership between city staff and the property owners and their managers. Communication • Police Department establishes a residential rental unit tracking system. This system will document criminal and disorderly use occurrences, as defined in the ordinance and agreed to in the lease, when formal Police action such as a warnings, citations, or arrest occurs. • Police will notify the licensee/manager following an occurrence at a unit, requesting their assistance in resolving that situation. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 2 - Crime Free Rental Housing Program Page 3 Crime/Drug Event - In the event of an identified crime or drug occurrence, the licensee will be notified that they must implement the tenancy termination condition in the lease for the unit. Police will be available to provide assistance and documentation of the event to the licensee. Disorderly Use - Following the first disorderly use occurrence of a unit within a 12 month period, the licensee will be notified of the event. The second disorderly use occurrence will again result in licensee notification and a request for them to respond in writing back to the city on their plan for preventing future occurrences. A third occurrence within 12 months will result in the licensee being notified that they must implement the tenancy termination condition in the lease for the unit. Compliance • An administrative license violation fee of $750 monthly would be established. Administered by the Inspections Department as licensing authority, the fee would be applied only if licensee decides to not initiate corrective action by terminating tenancy with the tenant when specified in the lease document. Fee would apply every month that the licensing violation continues. The fee would not be charged to owners unable to implement the tenant termination lease language due to a court decision. • Correction of crime free and disorderly use requirements of this proposed ordinance and payment of any outstanding fees would be required before the annual business license for the rental building is renewed. STAFFING AND FEES: Additional Inspection and Police staff time will be necessary to create and maintain the proposed program. The most work intensive component will be the data tracking system utilized by the Police. Initially planned to be accomplished by existing staff, future work loads may require the additional part or full time data entry/clerical. The current annual fee is based on covering the program cost for property maintenance inspections. Rental license fees are not proposed to be changed at this time to implement the program. SUMMARY: This program is designed to be an effective and efficient tool in partnering with the hundreds of rental property owners to maintain crime and drug free housing for the city. Clarity of information, open disclosure, and simplicity in administration are important components. After months of study, staff believes this to be a reasonable program design to as accomplish our goals. Attachments: Proposed Ordinance - Draft Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections John Luse, Chief of Police Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 2 - Crime Free Rental Housing Program Page 4 *Draft* Subdivision VIII. Rental Housing Sec. 8-326. License required. (a) The owner of a residential building or portion thereof operated as rental housing with one or more dwelling units must obtain a rental housing license. The license shall contain a statement that the tenant or tenants may contact the attorney general for information regarding the rights and obligations of owners and tenants under state law. The statement shall include the telephone number and address of the attorney general. (b) The term “rental housing” means any occupied dwelling or dwelling unit that is not owner occupied. The term includes any dwelling or dwelling unit occupied by a relative of the owner. (c) Exceptions. No license shall be required under the following circumstances: (1) A single family dwelling or single dwelling unit of a duplex occupied by the building owner for a minimum of six months per calendar year. (2) Rented rooms within an owner occupied dwelling unit. (3) Rented dwelling units that are part of a condominium or townhouse association. (Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-309A.), 11-6-2000, Ord. No. 2282-04, 11-15-04) Sec. 8-327. Required Application Information. The owner must identify a designated property manager responsible for operation and maintenance of each licensed property. Contact information for the property manager must be provided on the license application, and the owner must provide the city with any changes occurring within the license period. The owner may be the designated property manager. The owner must submit verification with the license application that the designated property manager has attended required training as specified in this section and that the crime free/drug free and Disorderly Use language required by this section is contained in the licensed property tenant lease or leases. Section 8-328. Crime Free/Drug Free Training. The owner of rental housing or designated property manager responsible for on-site operation of the licensed property shall attend an approved training program in The Minnesota Crime Free Multi-Housing Program before an annual rental license is issued. Owners and managers are required to attend the class once. Any new owner or newly designated property manager during a license period must attend the training, or provide evidence of previously attending, before a new license is issued. A Provisional License may be issued for six months to accommodate the training schedule. Sec. 8-329. Maintenance. The owner of rental housing must maintain all units, common space and exteriors of such buildings in compliance with the City Code and state and federal laws and regulations. The owner of such rental housing shall perform a periodic assessment of all portions of the building and correct any inadequacies to ensure the building is maintained in good repair. (Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-309B.), 11-6-2000, Ord. No. 2282-04, 11-15-04) St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 2 - Crime Free Rental Housing Program Page 5 Sec. 8-330. City Inspections. (a) The owner of rental housing shall permit access by the City to perform a minimum of one inspection every two years of the common space and every dwelling unit. The City may perform or require additional inspections if deemed necessary by the City or by the request of a tenant. The owner shall notify the tenant or tenants of the time when the City inspection will be conducted and provide access to the units. (b) The owner’s rental housing license may be suspended, revoked or denied renewal for failing to maintain the licensed building in compliance with the property maintenance code as set forth in chapter 6, article V of this Code or otherwise failing to comply with the requirements of the City Code or applicable state or federal law. (Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-309C.), 11-6-2000, Ord. No. 2282-04, 11-15-04) Sec. 8-331. Crime Free and Disorderly Use Lease Requirements. (a) All tenant leases shall contain the following crime free/drug free and Disorderly Use language: (1) Crime free/drug free. 1. Resident, any members of the resident’s household or a guest or other person affiliated with resident shall not engage in criminal activity, including drug-related criminal activity, on or near the premises. “Drug-related activity” means the illegal manufacture, sale, distribution, use, or possession with intent to manufacture, sell, distribute, or use of a controlled substance or any substance represented to be drugs (as defined in Section 102 of the Controlled Substance Act [21 U.S.C. 802]). 2. Resident(s), any member of the resident’s household or a guest or other person affiliated with resident shall not engage in any act intended to facilitate criminal activity, including drug-related criminal activity, on or near the premises. 3. Resident or members of the household will not permit the dwelling unit to be used for, or to facilitate criminal activity, including drug-related criminal activity, regardless of whether the individual engaging in such activity is a member of the household, or a guest. 4. Resident, any member of the resident’s household or a guest, or other person affiliated with the resident shall not engage in the unlawful manufacturing, selling, using, storing, keeping, or giving of a controlled substance at any locations, whether on or near the premises or otherwise. 5. Resident, any member of the resident’s household, or a guest or other person affiliated with the resident, shall not engage in any criminal activity, including prostitution, criminal street gang activity, threatening or intimidating or assaultive behavior including but not limited to the unlawful discharge of firearms, on or near the premises, or any breach of the lease agreement that otherwise jeopardizes the health, safety and welfare of the landlord, his agent or other resident or involving imminent or actual serious property damage. 6. VIOLATION OF THE ABOVE PROVISIONS SHALL BE A MATERIAL AND IRREPARABLE VIOLATION OF THE LEASE AND GOOD CAUSE FOR IMMEDIATE TERMINATION OF TENANCY. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 2 - Crime Free Rental Housing Program Page 6 (2) Disorderly Use. Residents, members of the resident’s household, guests, or other persons under the residents control shall not engage in the following Disorderly Use activities: Alcohol violations of Minnesota Statutes Section 340A.401; Trespassing violations of Minnesota Statutes Section 609.222; Disorderly Conduct violations of Minnesota Statutes Section 609.72; and Prohibited Noises violations of City Code Section 12-125. Three Disorderly Use violations involving the same tenancy within a continuous twelve month period shall be a material violation of the lease and good cause for termination of the tenancy. (b) These lease provisions shall be incorporated into every new lease for tenancy beginning January 1, 2008 and all renewed leases by January 1, 2009. (c) Upon determination by the Police Department that a licensed premises or unit within a licensed premises was used in violation of crime or drug activities specified in this section, the Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the licensee and property manager of the violation. The licensee or property manager shall notify the tenant within ten days of the violation of the crime free lease addendum or language within the lease and proceed with termination of tenancy. (d) Upon determination by the Police Department that a licensed premises or unit within a licensed premises was used for Disorderly Use activities as in this section, the Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the licensee and property manager of the violation and direct the licensee and property manager to take steps to prevent further Disorderly Use violations. (e) If a second Disorderly Use violation as determined by the Police Department occurs within a continuous twelve month period involving the same tenancy, the Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the licensee and property manager of the second violation. The licensee or property manager shall respond in writing within ten (10) days of receipt of the notice with an action plan to prevent further Disorderly Use violations. (f) If a third Disorderly Use violation as determined by the Police Department occurs within a continuous twelve month period involving the same tenancy, the Police Department shall cause notice to be made to the licensee and property manager of the third violation. The licensee or property manager shall notify the tenant within ten days of the Disorderly Use violation of the crime free lease addendum or language within the lease and proceed with termination of tenancy. Sec. 8-332. Administrative License Violation Fee. A licensee failing to proceed with an action to terminate the tenancy after Police Department notification in accordance with a crime free/drug free violation or the third Disorderly Use violation shall pay an administrative license violation fee of $750.00 for each calendar month that the licensee fails to proceed. The tenancy must be terminated and outstanding fees paid prior to the city renewing a rental license for the licensed premises. Secs. 8-333--8-345. Reserved. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 3 - Police Incident and Other City Info Mapping Page 1 3. Police Incident and Other City Info Mapping Police and Information Resources PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION: Staff desires to update the City Council on the status of Police incident mapping and the capability the city has to map other city related data and items of interest. When staff last updated the Council on this initiative, interest was expressed by some Councilmembers that we provide a demonstration of the proposed system. BACKGROUND: Earlier this year, several cities in the metropolitan area began including maps on their web sites that show selected types of crime incidents. The Star Tribune wrote a story on these cities. At that time, St. Louis Park indicated its interest in such mapping; however, we wanted to consider the context in which such data would be presented so as to present an accurate interpretation of incidents and other community policing efforts in St. Louis Park. Crucial to this context is the notion that people reporting crimes or other types of disturbances (not crimes) is helpful to the Police Department in its overall efforts to help create a safe community. As a result, staff has partially developed a web-based mapping application that includes both selected crimes and other calls for service (completed development would occur following Council feedback). This includes the last 30 days of incidents at a citywide view, and the last 90 days of incidents at a neighborhood level, with updates provided monthly. In addition, it does so in a way that allows an overlay of neighborhood boundaries. More important than anything else, it provides links to crime prevention tips. As requested by Council, staff will demonstrate the mapping application that has been developed by staff, and presented to the Police Advisory Commission for its review and feedback. That feedback has been incorporated. Council’s input and feedback is also crucial before this map is promoted on the City’s web site. In addition to police related incidents, staff will also describe some other potential uses of the same mapping architecture. For example, maps could be made available to the public to make it easy to see such items as Fire Department calls for service, construction updates, tree trimming areas, City buildings, and park pavilions. This continues the City’s efforts at growing the utility of the web site and encouraging its use. COUNCIL POLICY DECISION: Staff solicits Council’s feedback, suggestions, and direction to proceed with adding this mapping application to the City’s web site. The Police Advisory Commission has provided a recommendation to proceed. VISION ST. LOUIS PARK REALTIONSHIP: Community Connectedness. Prepared by: John Luse, Police Chief Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 4 - Solid Waste Program Page 1 4. Solid Waste Program Public Works PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION: The purpose of this discussion is to obtain input from Council on revised program changes and a proposed public process related to those program changes. BACKGROUND: At the March 12, 2007 Study Session, staff provided Council with current program information, a basic process to follow to consider future solid waste program collection services, and requested Council input on program and contract concerns or issues. The major focus of the discussion was how to enhance the existing recycling program as well as a desire to expand recycling to the entire community. At the May 14, 2007 Study Session, staff provided Council with options to consider for increasing recycling and improving environmental stewardship as well as asked if Council was interested in renegotiating a contract (extending the existing collection contract) with Waste Management, Inc. (WMI). Council provided input on the proposed program changes, expressed an interest in a public involvement process to consider possible changes, and stated they desired staff to utilize an RFP process to establish the next collection contract. POSSIBLE PROGRAM CHANGES: Based on Council feedback obtained at the May 14 Study Session discussion, staff has revised the proposed program changes. To make the revised options easier to review and consider staff has created the following:  Summary of all of the possible program changes - Attachment “A”  Summary of only contract related possible program changes - Attachment “B”  Summary of non-contract related possible program changes - Attachment “C” The options (Attachment A) were separated into contract related (Attachment B) and non- contract related (Attachment C) categories because the timeframe for deciding the possible changes can be different for each category. The contract related options (Attachment B) need to be decided by September 31, 2007, to meet the following deadlines: 1. Review and revise the existing program / services - complete by September 31, 2007. 2. Review and revise the existing contract (program and service delivery requirements) - complete by October 31, 2007. 3. Begin and complete the RFP process (new contract in place) - complete by January 31, 2008. 4. New contractor begins October 1, 2008. Non-contract related changes can be done either during that timeframe or later as time permits. Again, the bolded options on Attachments A, B, and C are options recommended by staff for further investigation. If Council supports staff moving ahead with some or all of the recommendations, further investigation will be needed to determine prior to a final decision and implementation. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 4 - Solid Waste Program Page 2 PUBLIC PROCESS: Staff has reviewed the program changes being recommended and feels they are beneficial and at the same time not controversial. We also feel they are consistent with the environmental direction received by the community during the recent Vision Project. As such, staff feels the public process can simply consist of two parts: 1. Inform residents of future service / contract changes or offerings; and, 2. Inform commercial / industrial and high density residential property owners of our intent to offer them collection services and assess their interest in that regard. Relevant input will be incorporated into our program and contract(s) where appropriate. We expect the majority of our effort will be spent working with the commercial / industrial and high density residential property owners to arrange collection services for those which are interested in that. The course of action and timeline that staff is proposing to use for this is as follows: Date Event / Target Group Purpose Media June 7 Business Council Meeting Provide information, receive input Dialogue and handouts June 20 Green Business Forum Provide information, receive input Dialogue and handouts June 21 SPARC Meeting * Provide information, receive input Dialogue and handouts Jun - Sept Cable TV Provide information to residents Electronic Jun - Sept Web Site Provide information to all Electronic Jun - Sept Multi-family landlords/managers Provide information, receive input, assess interest in collection services Mailing / return survey Jun - Sept Business owners/managers Provide information, receive input, assess interest in collection services Mailing / return survey August Park Perspective Provide information to residents Newsletter * SPARC - St. Louis Park Rental Coalition POLICY QUESTIONS: 1. Are the proposed program / service changes acceptable to Council? 2. Is the public process relating to the proposed program changes acceptable to Council? NEXT STEPS: If Council is satisfied with the program changes and public process proposed above, staff is prepared to begin the public process outlined above as well as investigate the recommended changes to determine their feasibility. Attachments: Attachment “A” – Possible Program Changes - All Attachment “B” - Possible Program Changes – Contract Issues Attachment “C” - Possible Program Changes – Noncontract Issues Prepared by: Scott Merkley, Public Works Coordinator Sarah Hellekson, Public Works Administrative Specialist Reviewed by: Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 4 - Solid Waste Program Page 3 Attachment “A” POSSIBLE PROGRAM CHANGES - ALL REFUSE/GARBAGE Possible modifications to the Pay-As-You Throw (PAYT) Program  Provide a smaller service level (30 gallon bi-weekly)  Change PAYT rates to enhance incentive to reduce waste Possible modifications to Reduce Litter  Provide waste collection at bus stops/shelters where there is a need  Increase public education efforts aimed at proper use of current carts / bins  Provide recycling containers with lids  Enforce indoor storage of carts / bins RECYCLING Possible modifications to the Residential Program (single family – 4 plex)  Increase allowable cardboard size beyond the 3’x3’ tied bundles  Increase the amount of the “Get Caught Recycling Award”  Change the name of the “Get Caught Recycling Award” due to cultural concerns  Offer an organics collection service to residents  Require/provide an organics collection service for all properties  Provide single sort collection with carts  Reinstatement of the recycling credit  Create a mandatory ordinance requiring all single family residences to recycle Possible modifications to the Multi-family Dwellings (MFD - residential larger that 4-plex) Program  Require larger recycling areas at MFD’s (new construction)  Expand the recycling education program for MFD  Enforce recycling ordinance/state law requiring MFD owners to offer recycling  Offer city recycling collection services to MFD’s  Create financial penalties for not recycling  Require MFD’s to participate in city provided recycling collection services (organized collection) Possible modifications to the Commercial/Industrial Program:  Enhance the Green Business recycling education program  Educate businesses regarding the benefits of organics recycling  Encourage businesses to donate perishable food and other items to local charities  Encourage businesses to do organics recycling  Provide recycling collection at bus stops/shelters where there is a need  Offer city recycling collection services to the commercial/industrial community  Create financial penalties for not recycling  Require businesses to do organics recycling  Require commercial/industrial properties to participate in City provided recycling collection services (organized collection) St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 4 - Solid Waste Program Page 4 YARD WASTE / COMPOST Possible modifications to the current Program  Encourage the use of containers and biodegradable bags for yard waste collection  Eliminate the use of plastic bags for yard waste collection  Allow single family residential properties to compost organics on site  Provide a drop-off site for leaves and brush OTHER WASTE / “GREEN” INITIATIVES Possible modifications to the current Program  Promote the use of reusable (i.e., canvas) shopping bags within the city at grocery & retail stores  Ban retail plastic bag use within the city (i.e. grocery & retail stores)  Promote local household hazardous waste drop off sites  Provide curbside pickup of household hazardous wastes  Provide for the free curbside collection of bulk items & appliances EDUCATION AND CUSTOMER SERVICE No changes identified at this time Items in bold are staff recommended changes. (If we move ahead with staff recommendations, further investigation may be needed prior to implementation) St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 4 - Solid Waste Program Page 5 Attachment “B” POSSIBLE PROGRAM CHANGES - CONTRACT ISSUES REFUSE/GARBAGE Possible modifications to the Pay-As-You Throw (PAYT) Program  Provide a smaller service level (30 gallon bi-weekly)  Change PAYT rates to enhance incentive to reduce waste Possible modifications to Reduce Litter  Provide waste collection at bus stops/shelters where there is a need RECYCLING Possible modifications to the Residential Program (single family – 4 plex)  Increase allowable cardboard size beyond the 3’x3’ tied bundles  Offer an organics collection service to residents  Require/provide an organics collection service for all properties  Provide single sort collection with carts Possible modifications to the Multi-family Dwellings (MFD - residential larger that 4-plex) Program  Offer city recycling collection services to MFD’s  Require MFD’s to participate in city provided recycling collection services (organized collection) Possible modifications to the Commercial/Industrial Program:  Provide recycling collection at bus stops/shelters where there is a need  Offer city recycling collection services to the commercial/industrial community  Require commercial/industrial properties to participate in City provided recycling collection services (organized collection) YARD WASTE / COMPOST Possible modifications to the current Program  None OTHER WASTE / “GREEN” INITIATIVES Possible modifications to the current Program  Provide curbside pickup of household hazardous wastes EDUCATION AND CUSTOMER SERVICE No changes identified at this time Items in bold are staff recommended changes. (If we move ahead with staff recommendations, further investigation may be needed prior to implementation) St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 4 - Solid Waste Program Page 6 Attachment “C” POSSIBLE PROGRAM CHANGES - NONCONTRACT ISSUES REFUSE/GARBAGE Possible modifications to the Pay-As-You Throw (PAYT) Program  None Possible modifications to Reduce Litter  Increase public education efforts aimed at proper use of current carts / bins  Provide recycling containers with lids  Enforce indoor storage of carts / bins RECYCLING Possible modifications to the Residential Program (single family – 4 plex)  Increase the amount of the “Get Caught Recycling Award”  Change the name of the “Get Caught Recycling Award” due to cultural concerns  Reinstatement of the recycling credit  Create a mandatory ordinance requiring all single family residences to recycle Possible modifications to the Multi-family Dwellings (MFD - residential larger that 4-plex) Program  Require larger recycling areas at MFD’s (new construction)  Expand the recycling education program for MFD  Enforce recycling ordinance/state law requiring MFD owners to offer recycling  Create financial penalties for not recycling Possible modifications to the Commercial/Industrial Program:  Enhance the Green Business recycling education program  Educate businesses regarding the benefits of organics recycling  Encourage businesses to donate perishable food and other items to local charities  Encourage businesses to do organics recycling  Create financial penalties for not recycling  Require businesses to do organics recycling YARD WASTE / COMPOST Possible modifications to the current Program  Encourage the use of containers and biodegradable bags for yard waste collection  Eliminate the use of plastic bags for yard waste collection  Allow single family residential properties to compost organics on site  Provide a drop-off site for leaves and brush OTHER WASTE / “GREEN” INITIATIVES Possible modifications to the current Program  Promote the use of reusable (i.e., canvas) shopping bags within the city at grocery & retail stores  Ban retail plastic bag use within the city (i.e. grocery & retail stores)  Promote local household hazardous waste drop off sites  Provide for the free curbside collection of bulk items & appliances EDUCATION AND CUSTOMER SERVICE No changes identified at this time Items in bold are staff recommended changes. (If we move ahead with staff recommendations, further investigation may be needed prior to implementation). St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 5 - 2008 Budget Process Page 1 5. 2008 Budget Process Administrative Services PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION: The City Manager proposes to have a brief conversation with the City Council to reaffirm the approach to be used to prepare the 2008 budget for the City Council's consideration. It is important that staff clearly understand Council’s wishes to ensure the proper budget information is compiled. BACKGROUND: At the last study session, the City Manager and Finance Director discussed the process for developing the 2008 budget. While it did not appear the Council desired any significant changes to the budget process in and of itself, the Council did provide input on the information to be provided. While varying opinions were expressed, it appeared the Council desired staff to provide different budget scenarios for Council consideration. Based on this input, I plan on directing the Department Directors to provide two different budget scenarios as follows: • Preparation of a budget scenario that basically provides for a base line budget taking into consideration where necessary up to a 3% adjustment for inflation. For those areas that exceed 3%, justification will be provided. In essence this would be a budget that provides the same level of services currently provided to our constituents in 2007. • Preparation of a budget that provides for the base line level of services plus any additional expenses or revenues relating to new programs, services or initiatives, particularly with regard to the implementation of the Strategic Directions adopted by the City Council and Vision. Specific documentation will need to be provided for these new programs, services, or initiatives. If this approach is contrary to the Council’s wishes, it would be helpful to the budget process if the Council would clarify the approach desired. Prepared and Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Discussion Item: 052907 - 6 - Protocol for City Council Communication with Constituents Page 1 6. Protocol for City Council Communication with Constituents Administrative Services PURPOSE OF DISCUSSION: At the last study session the City Council asked that this matter be placed on a future study session agenda. In particular, it appeared that Council was interested in discussing the protocol to be used for communicating with constituents when all or several Council members are contacted at the same time by the same constituent (e.g. via e-mail). In addition to the above topic, it may also be helpful to discuss the approach to be used in situations where a single Councilmember is contacted by a constituent with a request for assistance. Prepared and Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 7 - Community Event Guidelines Page 1 7. Community Event Guidelines Administrative Services PURPOSE OF REPORT: To outline for Council the process staff proposes be used for scheduling Council’s participation in community events. BACKGROUND: Each year, Councilmembers are asked to participate in community events such as National Night Out, the Children First Ice Cream Social, Bookmark in the Park, Parktacular Parade, etc. Elected officials play an important role in these gatherings and city staff wants to ensure that it is a smooth process. Based on previous conversations with Council, staff assistance with transportation, event sign-up and information is helpful. To streamline this process, staff has developed the following guidelines:  If a councilmember desires or is asked to participate in a parade or other local event (e.g. National Night Out), scheduling will be arranged through the City Manager’s Office and will be based on availability of city vehicles and staff. If a councilmember chooses to ride in a private vehicle, that vehicle and driver will be arranged by the councilmember(s)  If a councilmember desires assistance with event registrations, National Night Out party lists or event specifics, please contact Marcia Honold for scheduling assistance. Staff will provide advance notice of upcoming events in your packets and/or the City Manager’s Digest. If there are concerns or questions regarding this approach, please let staff know. Prepared and Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 8 - April 2007 Monthly Financial Report Page 1 8. April 2007 Monthly Financial Report Finance PURPOSE: This report is designed to provide summary information regarding the overall level of revenues and expenditures in both the General Fund and the Park and Recreation fund. These funds should be a primary concern in analyzing the city’s financial health because they represent the discretionary use of tax levy dollars. For the first three month period of the year, actual revenues and expenditures should generally run about 33% of the annual budget. Significant items that exceed the norm are highlighted below along with a general discussion of the cause for the variance. General Fund Expenditures: • Finance expenditures are higher due to the hiring of a temporary employee from Accountemps to cover the departures of two of our accountants. Parks and Recreation Expenditures: • Organized Recreation expenditures are higher due to gearing up for summer recreation programs. Attachments: Monthly Financial Reports Prepared by: Bruce M. DeJong, Finance Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 8 - April 2007 Monthly Financial Report Page 2 St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 8 - April 2007 Monthly Financial Report Page 3 St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 8 - April 2007 Monthly Financial Report Page 4 St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 8 - April 2007 Monthly Financial Report Page 5 St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 9 - License Renewal Process for Deliquent Accounts Page 1 9. License Renewal Process for Delinquent Taxes and Accounts Inspections PURPOSE OF REPORT: To inform Council of the license renewal process for applicants that are delinquent with property tax or city utility bill payments. BACKGROUND: During re-codification of the city code several years ago, there was a major rewrite and simplification of the licensing chapter. One of the changes adopted (Section 8-188) was the ability not to issue or renew a business license if the property owner was not current with property tax payments. While not an issue with the various licenses processed at the time, adding the provision in Section 8-188 was preventative. While once utilized in response to a notice from the state, reviewing each licensed property through the county records was never initiated due to resource implications. ANAYLSIS: Property Taxes - According to the Hennepin County Property Division, less than 1% (203 properties) of all St. Louis Park properties are delinquent in property taxes. The county could only provide the total number of properties and not a list of individual addresses. To determine if a business license holder is current on property tax payments, city staff would need to enter each address individually into the Hennepin County Property Information Search on their website. The process may take several minutes for each address. With approximately 1500 business licenses issued for 2007, a significant amount of staff time would need to be expended to accomplish this task. During the November/December licensing period, this has not been possible to accommodate as a part of the renewal of a license. Utility Payments – The City’s code does not currently require current payment of utility charges to receive a business license. However, the process the City uses to receive payment of delinquent utility payments at the end of the year is to add them onto the property taxes of the property payable the next year. To determine if any of those properties are delinquent at the time of licensing, an individual search of each property in our utility billing system would be required. The software applications currently do not relate to each other. As with tax status, the verification is time consuming. According to attorney Tom Scott, a code amendment could be added requiring current payment of utility charges as currently in place for property taxes. Implementing this performance standard may be more difficult to fairly administer since many properties are delinquent for short periods according to Finance. The additional staff time to verify and pursue correction may not be currently available. Given the fact that the City has a mechanism in place to collect delinquent utility bills, staff is planning to implement the following procedure change as a manageable solution rather then adding another requirement at this time. PROCEDURE CHANGE: Staff recently became aware that some of the licensed properties are not current with property tax payments. Although somewhat easier to resolve during the annual license renewal process, the code does provide the authority to suspend a license during the license period should a violation of license conditions occur. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 9 - License Renewal Process for Deliquent Accounts Page 2 Staff proposes that Inspections begin to systematically verify tax status through the county records as time permits throughout the year. Licensees will be notified of pending license suspension when delinquent property taxes are identified. While one or two years may be needed to completely cycle through all the licensees, this approach will provide a process to ensure compliance of tax payments as specified in the code. Staff will also follow up on those properties that are delinquent with their property taxes if it should find out about those through other means. One scenario that may occur is when the business license holder leases space and does not own the property. Do we suspend or not issue the license even though the license holder does not control the payment of property taxes? City Attorney Tom Scott was not sure at the time of this report on how the city would proceed if that situation occurred. Staff will continue to review the legal implications with the City Attorney. To further the education of licensees regarding code requirements, the annual license renewal mailing this November to all businesses will include information on tax status requirements for license holders. Prepared by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 10 - ParkWiFi Update Page 1 10. ParkWiFi Update Information Resources PURPOSE OF REPORT: The purpose of this report is to update the City Council on the status of ParkWiFi. BACKGROUND: The most significant pieces of news are: (1) construction has resumed on ParkWiFi following Council direction and pole location criteria and (2) staff recently learned that Xcel Energy will allow the City to mount wireless radios on some of its poles. This notification from Xcel is so new, it came after the latest issue of Park Perspective was sent to press. However, we will be able to incorporate this into radios mounted in the First Mile. The use of Xcel poles will be limited to those locations where sunlight is insufficient to power the solar panels and the intersection Xcel pole location happens to provide radio signal coverage sufficient to cover the intended area. This will not always be able to substitute for a location needed along a block at a lot line. However, it is another tool and will eliminate the need to add as many new poles as originally planned. Beyond the above updates, most other significant points are included in the June / July issue of Park Perspective, which is scheduled to arrive at homes and businesses the week of June 4. It will be on-line before that. Here are the related articles from that issue: ParkWiFi Changes Made in Response to Resident Feedback Construction of the nation’s first solar-powered, citywide wireless Internet service is underway right here in St. Louis Park after a short delay. City staff interrupted the ParkWiFi project in mid-April following resident feedback about the solar-powered radio pole installation necessary for the project’s completion. The city, under direction of the St. Louis Park City Council, listened and solicited suggestions about the design and locations for the 400 poles to be installed citywide and ultimately adopted new guidelines for installation based on these suggestions including: • Aiming to locate half of the 16-foot poles with attached solar panels at intersections, co-located on the same poles with street name and traffic control signs wherever possible; • Painting the poles brown to better blend in with the environment; and • Where possible, authorizing movement of the poles closer to public right-of-way locations (often boulevards) between properties instead of the middle of the property. All of the poles will be located on the public right of way or on public land or structures. City staff also considered other suggestions such as alleys and private property as locations, but buildings, trees and other interference do not allow sufficient solar exposure, radio signal coverage or the radios to connect with each other – all critical to having a wireless service that works. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 10 - ParkWiFi Update Page 2 “We took the aesthetic concerns of residents about the poles very seriously,” said Clint Pires, the city’s chief information officer. “The community has been instrumental in this project – leading it in fact – since Day One. We thought it was not only necessary to pause and listen some more, but also to create some real solutions.” The overall project delay amounts to about six weeks, with Phase 1 service beginning approximately July 21 and the Phase 4 completion slated for mid-October. Separately, construction along Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100 is causing some delay to part of the city in that area. Pires said conversations with residents and the council made two things very clear: solar power remains very important to this community as a means of powering this project, and preserving the integrity of the system and its service coverage was paramount. “With the council’s overall philosophy of environmental stewardship in all aspects of city operations, they felt it was important to continue use of solar power with ParkWiFi,” Pires said. “And while there are trade-offs with any technology, we will do our best to minimize visual clutter while maximizing both the solar aspect and us-ability of this network.” Locations of poles are designed to provide good signal coverage for the users, and receive adequate sunlight to power the units. Factors such as the tree canopy and density of buildings in St. Louis Park limit the number of suitable locations. Alleys and backyards are usually poor locations for these poles because of the limited ability of the radio to communicate with others within the system. Work on the fiber optic network that serves as the ultimate connection from wireless to the Internet continues over the next couple of months. Pires said he is gratified by the pride in the project expressed by residents who have offered to have poles installed along their property lines because of the city’s dedication to environmental stewardship – a tenet of community life that emerged boldly during the Vision St. Louis Park process. In the city’s best attempt to match wire-less network needs with community acceptance and embrace that enthusiasm, the city is soliciting residents, businesses and other invested St. Louis Park stakeholders to inform the city if they are interested in having a solar powered wireless radio and pole installed on public right-of-way along their property. While engineering design drives final locations, the city will include as many volunteered locations as possible. An added bonus for these volunteers: while we aim to provide effective wireless service citywide, close proximity to the equipment enhances signal strength and overall level of service, Pires said. As installation continues, the public is invited to continue offering feedback and suggestions to Broadband Coordinator Frank Landis at (952) 928-2858 or via e-mail to: flandis@stlouispark.org. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 10 - ParkWiFi Update Page 3 ParkWiFi is an optional city service designed to be paid for by subscribers. To learn more about the ParkWiFi project, have more detailed questions answered, or register for service, call (952) 928-2859 or visit www.parkwifi.com. Note to Pilot Subscribers: ParkWiFi’s Heroes In April 2006, ParkWiFi’s pilot project started in four areas of the City. About 300 people signed up and took the wi-fi plunge, sharing the risk with the City for a project that had no guarantee to continue, would experience technical bumps and limitations, and which these pilots would pay monthly fees for. Most pilots continue to use ParkWiFi success-fully, anxiously waiting for the newer and additional wireless radios designed to provide a commercial grade service. Pilot areas have a limited number of radios, and they are located on existing utility poles that have proved to provide limited cover-age. Complicating this in the spring is tree leaf out, which the signals try to penetrate (not an issue in wintertime). To address some of these concerns, some tree trimming will occur where issues are reported. ParkWiFi has also provided some credits to pilot subscribers who have experienced major connection problems, and made available an alternative land line service to tide folks over until the full build out. In the full build out, ParkWiFi will install its own poles with newer radios and solar panels in the best locations for service. As the pilot project shows, installing our own poles in the right locations is essential to project success. We also understand added concerns with the project delay to address resident concerns. “Pilot fatigue” is real and we will do our best to get the system built as fast and responsibly as possible. Meantime, thanks for being the pilot heroes of ParkWiFi! Prepared by: Clint Pires, Chief Information Officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 11 - Anti-Graffiti Program Page 1 11. Anti-Graffiti Program Police Department PURPOSE OF REPORT: To update the Council on the proliferation of graffiti in St. Louis Park and outline prevention and response strategies which are being developed and implemented to address this issue. BACKGROUND: St. Louis Park has experienced a significant increase in the number of observed and reported incidents of graffiti in our community during the past three years. Staff from the Police, Inspections, Public Works and Parks and Recreation Departments have been meeting to discuss possible mitigation strategies for the spread of graffiti within the community. The strategies developed to date have identified the following areas of focus:  Graffiti Prevention  Identification and apprehension of graffiti suspects  Assessment of clean-up and related damage costs  Assessment of clean-up efficiency  Consideration/assessment of quality of life impact  Campaign to inform and engage the community In addition, several City departments have developed a plan to implement these strategies which can be generally characterized as follows: Inspections:  Will continue to work directly with property owners to remove graffiti in a timely manner in accordance with City code.  Will research various graffiti removing products to make sure we are recommending the most effective products or contract services to property owners.  Will coordinate distribution of graffiti removal products via police station, fire stations, City Hall and other outlets. Public Works:  Will continue to identify and quickly remove graffiti  Will continue to notify the police department of these graffiti incidents, keeping in mind the previously listed areas of focus. Parks and Recreation:  Will continue to identify and quickly remove graffiti  Will continue to notify the police department of these graffiti incidents, keeping in mind the previously listed areas of focus. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 11 - Anti-Graffiti Program Page 2 Police Department:  Engage school liaison officers in gathering intelligence and educating students, staff and parents.  Contact businesses that sell spray paint and other paint products and ask for voluntary compliance in not selling to customers under 18.  Continue to analyze statistical data and develop directed patrol plans using this data.  Create a database to assist in more effectively analyzing graffiti incidents.  Contact neighboring communities regarding their graffiti experiences and establish regular meetings to share information.  Create a “graffiti tip line.”  Continue to offer rewards for information  Research for possible ordinance proposal restricting sale of paint and related products. SUMMARY: Attached to this report are a Communications Plan developed by Jamie Zwilling, Communications Coordinator and a Statistical Analysis of Graffiti Incidents between 2005 and 2007. It is important to note that mandatory reporting and documenting of graffiti incidents may partially explain the increases indicated during the first quarter of 2007. It is also important to note that our analysis indicates that only about 3% of these graffiti incidents could possibly be gang-related. We will be moving forward using the strategies and areas of focus outlined in this report and working with Jamie Zwilling to engage and inform the community regarding the issue. It is clear from experiences in other communities around the country that the police department alone cannot effectively address graffiti. Finally, the proliferation of graffiti has resulted in this issue consuming increased amounts of staff time and other resources. The ability to continue using staff and contract services to rapidly and effectively clean up graffiti and the ability to utilize options such as remote video surveillance systems will most likely have some budget implications going forward. Attachments: 2007 Anti-Graffiti Campaign – Communications Plan Statistical Analysis of Graffiti Incidents 2005-2007 Prepared by: John D. Luse, Chief of Police Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 11 - Anti-Graffiti Program Page 3 2007 Anti-Graffiti Campaign Communication Plan Goals  To educate residents and business owners about the type of graffiti present in our community (very little gang-related tagging)  To educate residents and business owners about how they can help the city combat and clean up graffiti  To educate residents and business owners about their obligations to cleaning up graffiti if they are victims of it Media Sun-Sailor  Pitch story about significant arrest made and use that for a starting point for a discussion about graffiti  Submit a guest column about what residents need to know about graffiti/how to help us Star Tribune  Pitch story about graffiti in the suburbs and what it all means, what communities are doing to combat it TV News  Pitch story about graffiti increasingly becoming a suburban problem with high costs for residents and local government Publications Park Perspective  Include story about graffiti and what we’re doing to combat it and what residents should know.  Run something quarterly perhaps … i.e. reminders about rewards, tips, etc. Brochure  Develop a brochure with some basics about graffiti abatement, tips, etc. that we can place in schools, city buildings, etc. Posters  Create anti-graffiti posters campaign to be placed around various locations in the city. Themes for these can include the criminal and financial aspects of graffiti. Possibly use the Keep America Beautiful “Graffiti Hurts” materials. Neighborhood Newsletters  Utilize neighborhood newsletters to educate about graffiti in similar manner as other publications. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 11 - Anti-Graffiti Program Page 4 Website www.stlouispark.org  Dedicate space to educate about graffiti … include links to the items mentioned above. Make the anti-graffiti campaign have a presence on the homepage, Police, Public Works pages as well. www.slppolice.org  Include a standing section on the new police pages about graffiti. This could even include pictures, list of current trends, etc. Cable TV “Park Perspective” Produce a segment for the upcoming show that will include either PD or Inspections or both talking about the graffiti problem and what we’re doing about it “Roll Call” Working with the PAC, we’ll produce a roundtable discussion about graffiti in our community, possibly even bring in folks from other communities to talk about what they’re doing. Grant Application to be made The Graffiti Hurts® National Grant Program aims to help communities kick-start or add on to a local graffiti prevention program. Grant funds may also be used for a one-time project that has the potential to help reduce graffiti vandalism in the community. The Graffiti Hurts® Grant Program will operate on alternate years with the Graffiti Hurts® National Awards Program. Grants of $2,000 are offered in two categories - community over 300,000 and community under 300,000 population. The funds must be used for projects that will be initiated in Fall 2007 and completed no later than December 31, 2008. Proposed projects can address graffiti prevention and education, eradication, or enforcement of local anti-graffiti laws. Businesses that make or operate graffiti removal equipment or technologies are not eligible. Application deadline is June 29, 2007. Communications will work with the PD on this application. While some of our activities will begin earlier than possible receipt of a grant, we expect this project to continue through the term of the grant if awarded. St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 11 - Anti-Graffiti Program Page 5 Statistical Analysis Graffiti Incidents 2005-2007 * In 2007, we began an improved tracking system to get an accurate account of the real problem. Public works is working hard to identify and document all graffiti incidents throughout the city. PD is writing reports on all incidents reported by Public Works. 2006 • 3% of total graffiti calls could possibly be “gang” related (5 of 165) • Estimated total property damage is approximately $35,000 (information taken from reported incidents and is believed to be a low estimate. • Average estimated cost per incident is $209. 2007 • 3% of total graffiti calls could possibly be “gang” related (2 of 66) • Estimated total property damage is approximately $16,000 (information taken from reported incidents and is believed to be a low estimate. • Average estimated cost per incident is $242 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Yearly Totals 2005 3 3 3 6 13 11 2 6 3 12 2 4 68 2006 2 4 9 15 14 23 31 8 16 20 6 17 165 2007 25 8 33 66* Monthly Totals 30 15 45 21 27 34 33 14 19 32 8 21 St. Louis Park City Council Study Session Written Report: 052907 - 11 - Anti-Graffiti Program Page 6 Statistical Analysis Graffiti Incidents 2005-2007 Neighborhood 2005 2006 2007 Neighborhood Totals Shelard 0 2 0 2 Kilmer 0 0 0 0 Crestview 1 1 0 2 Westwood Hills 0 2 1 3 Cedar Manor 1 0 0 1 North Side 1 5 1 7 Pennsylvania Park 3 2 0 5 Eliot 0 2 5 7 Blackstone 4 2 1 7 Cedarhurst 2 3 2 7 Eliot View 1 3 2 6 Cobblecrest 0 1 0 1 Minihaha 0 0 0 0 Amhurst 0 0 0 0 Aquila 5 9 0 14 Oak Hill 11 11 10 32 Texatonka 2 5 3 10 Bronx Park 4 12 8 24 Lenox 7 30 24 61 Sorenson 1 4 2 7 Birchwood 0 2 1 3 Lake Forest 1 0 0 1 Fern Hill 3 5 1 9 Triangle 0 8 0 8 Wolfe Park 6 7 1 14 Minikahda Oaks 0 1 0 1 Minikahda Vista 1 9 0 10 Browndale 3 9 0 12 Brookside 6 9 0 15 Brooklawn 2 4 1 7 Elmwood 2 7 1 10 Meadowbrook 0 4 1 5 S. Oak Hill 1 6 1 8 Westdale 0 0 0 0 Creekside 0 0 0 0