The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2025/10/15 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - Planning Commission - Regular Planning commission meeting October 15, 2025 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther at 952.924.2574 or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission meeting The St. Louis Park Planning Commission is meeting in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Members of the public can attend the planning commission meeting in person or watch the regular meeting by webstream at www.parktv.org and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14 and HD channel 798). Visit bit.ly/slppcagendas to view the agenda and reports. You can provide comment on agenda items in person at the meeting or by emailing your comments to info@stlouispark.org by noon the day of the meeting. Comments must be related to an item on the meeting agenda. Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION 1.Call to order – roll call 2.Approval of minutes – August 20, 2025 and September 3, 2025 3.Hearing 3.a. Application name: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment Location: 2753, 2759, 2760 and 2768 Louisiana Court Applicant: Trellis Co. Case No: 25-05-PUD 4.Other Business 5.Communications 6.Adjournment Future scheduled meeting/event dates: November 5, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting November 19, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting December 3, 2025 – planning commission study session January 7, 2026 – planning commission regular meeting 1 2 Planning commission August 20, 2025 6:00 p.m. Planning commission Unofficial Minutes Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha (arrived 6:03 p.m.), Matt Eckholm, Sylvie Hyman, Sara Strain, Tom Weber, John Flanagan Members absent: none Staff present: Katelyn Champoux, Laura Chamberlain, Gary Morrison Guests: J Lindsay, applicant; Patrick Sarver from Civil Site Group 1. Call to order – roll call. 2. Approval of minutes – Feb. 5, 2025, March 19, 2025, April 16, 2025, May 7, 2025, June 18, 2025, and July 16, 2025. It was moved by Commissioner Beneke, seconded by Commissioner Weber, to approve the Feb. 5, 2025, March 19, 2025, April 16, 2025, May 7, 2025, June 18, 2025, and July 16, 2025 minutes as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 3. Hearings. 3a. Title: Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits Location: 8528 Highway 7, 8530 Highway 7 Applicant: Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC Case No: 25‐03‐CP, 25‐04‐CUP Ms. Champoux presented the report. Ms. Champoux noted the applicant, Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC applied for a comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permit for the proposed development at 8528 Hwy. 7, along with a separate conditional use permit for the existing commercial development at 8530 Hwy. 7. She stated the applicant proposes development of a Chipotle restaurant with a drive-through lane for pick up orders only on a vacant property formerly owned by MNDOT. Commissioner Weber noted the easement from MNDOT and asked if this was always developable. Ms. Champoux stated the property was previously used for an onramp to Highway 7 from Aquila Ave S and MNDOT retained a highway easement over the property after the ramp was removed making it undevelopable. Commissioner Hyman stated that access will be restricted at Hwy. 7 and Aquila Ave., and there was no mention in the report of bicycle or pedestrian access to the site. She asked how pedestrians and bikers will get to the site if not in a vehicle. Ms. Champoux stated there are existing sidewalks along 37th St. and Aquila Ave., along with a sidewalk that connects to the site, as well as pedestrian ways within the site. 3 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 20, 2025 Chair Divecha asked about the entrance. Ms. Champoux stated it is in the northern corner of the building. Chair Divecha pointed out the closest parking and sidewalk to the building on the map. She asked if there was another entrance. Ms. Champoux stated she was not certain. Commissioner Strain asked if there were any concerns for the traffic flow with drive-throughs for both Chipotle and Jimmy John's. Ms. Champoux stated that staff looked at potential circulation issues on the site. She stated there is data from another Chipotle with a similar pick- up lane showing a maximum queue length of seven (7) cars. The site plan for the proposed project shows the drive-through lane can accommodate eight (8) cars without blocking drive aisles in the parking lot. Given this information, staff felt comfortable with the drive-through lane and felt it would not result in further backup into the parking area. Commissioner Flanagan stated his concern is around the traffic pinch point on the east side near the entrance to Jimmy John's. He stated it seems there will be a lot of traffic on the site: vehicle traffic to and from both drive throughs and pedestrian traffic to and from vehicles or to and from the sidewalk. He asked if staff have any concerns around this high volume of traffic through the entrance to the front of the building. Ms. Champoux stated the alternative routes through the site and the expansion of the drive aisle adjacent to the Jimmy John’s drive through should provide for a better flow through the site. She stated, however, that Commissioner Flanagan brings up a valid point and that with all the information and data provided, staff found the site circulation acceptable. Commissioner Beneke stated that it is already tough to turn left into that driveway. He asked if the applicant ever wanted to convert to a full drive-through; would another special permit be required. Ms. Champoux stated it will be a condition of approval that the pickup lane cannot convert to a full drive-through with in-vehicle sales. Commissioner Weber noted a building approved in the parking lot across the street from Costco a year ago that was also going to include a Chipotle. He asked if this was referred to earlier and if this will still be built. Ms. Champoux stated it has not been built yet, noting financing challenges with that site. Ms. Chamberlain added that the Park Place East site approvals are still valid for planning, and the city did receive building permits, but those applications have expired. Chair Divecha asked if the data was gathered from this other Chipotle site. Ms. Champoux stated it was developed by Chipotle themselves and was from a study done in Ohio. Chair Divecha asked if there are any doubts or concerns about this project meeting all the conditions to the fullest extent. Ms. Champoux stated that it does meet the requirements and noted the staff had no doubts about that. Chair Divecha opened the public hearing. 4 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 20, 2025 Mr. Sarver, the developer, answered questions for the commission. Commissioner Hyman stated her biggest concern at Knollwood is the small space where the building is and where parked cars will be. She stated there is one spot along the walkway in front of the building where there is only 5 feet and 2 inches between the building and the curb, and added she is concerned about vehicles and trucks that may back into spots and take up an entire space on the sidewalk where pedestrians will be walking. She asked if there is any thought to making that area bigger or having a barrier there, so cars do not impede pedestrians. Mr. Sarver stated that the 5 feet 2 inches is measured to the back of the curb, and where cars will be stopping and parking is at 8 feet, so it is a 6-foot offset from the face of the building to the face of the curb. He added that they pushed the entire building south a bit to accommodate the optimal parking solution. Commissioner Hyman stated that 5 feet is not sufficient for pedestrian space. She stated that two people walking there and holding items will be cramped in the space. She added that the disabled parking is on the east side and bike parking on the west side of the building, which shows no curb cut is concerning. Mr. Sarver stated there will be curb cuts at all sidewalk locations, but added they are not shown on the detailed graphic. Mr. Sarver pointed out where curb cuts and ramps will be on the diagram. He added that they can add another accessible ramp if needed. Commissioner Hyman stated her main concern is that people with bicycles do not have to push their bikes onto the curb to get to bike parking. Mr. Sarver stated he understood and asked if she had a suggestion as to where she would like additional access or an alternative location to the bike parking. Commissioner Hyman stated that the space between the building and the parking is too small for both bikes and pedestrians, and that is her concern. She stated that having additional bike parking would also be helpful. Mr. Sarver stated they are meeting the city’s requirement for bike parking. Commissioner Eckholm stated some of the nuances of the curb cuts are lost in the diagram, and he asked if some of the nuance of the pedestrian access is also lost, and if there will be some kind of painted or raised pathway for pedestrian access. He stated his main concern is the two- way driveway up to the Jimmy John’s drive-up, and noted he has tried to figure out how to cross safely here, but is not entirely clear on how to do so. Mr. Sarver stated one opportunity is the short walk connection from the Aquila sidewalk and added they could certainly add a painted sidewalk there, with an extension to the sidewalk also. Commissioner Eckholm stated that it would be helpful for both pedestrians and drivers to know where pedestrians will be walking. Mr. Sarver stated he agreed. 5 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Flanagan noted the traffic pinch point and the traffic backup at the Jimmy John’s drive-through, along with pedestrians trying to find the entrance to Jimmy John's on the new walkway. Mr. Sarver stated the existing conditions are about 8 feet narrower, and there is about 36 feet of curb between the Jimmy John’s pick-up window and the parking spaces in front of Chipotle. He added that it is 24 feet wide drive aisle, which allows two-way traffic and minimizes the amount the pedestrian has to cross, especially with crosswalks added. He added that this expansion will help facilitate efficient movement, as well as a striped line to indicate the Jimmy John’s drive-through. Commissioner Flanagan stated he is not a traffic expert, but still feels this is a congested area of concern. Mr. Sarver addressed the exit from the parking lot to the northeast, and Commissioner Flanagan agreed with that option. Commissioner Weber asked if there was ever any consideration for a one-way loop to enter and exit the area. Mr. Sarver stated they did consider that, but thought it would have negative implications to users in the 8350 Building, noting counterclockwise feels like the natural progression. Chair Divecha asked where food deliveries come in. Mr. Sarver stated they come in the same way as customers. They will use the rear service door of Chipotle. Commissioner Strain asked if Chipotle model is moving away from in-house orders and drive- through orders toward mobile orders with pick up windows only. Mr. Sarver stated yes, that is correct. He added orders will be done via the app only, with parking available if there is a delay and the order is brought to the customer by an employee. Commissioner Strain asked about the trash enclosure and if all the buildings on that site will share the same enclosure. Mr. Sarver stated yes, they will all share the trash enclosure location. Commissioner Strain noted a space between the trash enclosure and asked if there is a tree in that area, noting she wants to be sure all trees are planted where they are supposed to be. Mr. Sarver stated that the tree she is referring to on the plan is from an earlier version and is not accurate, and that the plan has not yet been updated. Chair Divecha asked if there is a wait at the drive-through, and if the customer has to park, will staff walk the order out to the customer. Mr. Sarver stated that it is correct. Chair Divecha stated that there should be safety considerations for staff crossing the parking lot to deliver orders to cars. Mr. Sarver stated they worked at length with Chipotle on this and stated that they were comfortable with the proximity between the building and cars. He stated he will address that again with Chipotle. 6 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 20, 2025 Mr. Lindsay stated they do know when there are backups and added that there have been no issues since COVID at the Jimmy John’s with backup. He stated that having a robust lane into the site will be helpful, and the parking spots will be bigger and more to code. He added that there is an adjustment that can be made related to curb cuts. He thanked the staff and commissioners for their work and feedback. Chair Divecha closed the public hearing. Commissioner Eckholm stated the comments and context given by Mr. Lindsay were helpful with the Jimmy John’s entrance concerns. He added he appreciated the openness to feedback and discussion with the applicant and developer this evening. Commissioner Weber added he appreciates all the discussion as well and noted the backup is from the order window. He noted that in the future, maybe Jimmy John’s will move to one vs. two windows. Commissioner Flanagan agreed and thanked all for the conversation. He added that the developers' openness to making some changes to the entrance and adding some traffic calming in the future will also be helpful. He noted he is comfortable with the plan. Chair Divecha thanked the applicants for their willingness to take feedback. She stated she does not have concerns because people can still enter both restaurants and make a choice. She noted that more car-centric businesses are not something she typically supports, but in this case, stated she will vote yes because this is congruent with city planning and code that exists today. She stated later this could be a discussion about allowing this, and added this is located at Knollwood Mall, which is vehicle-centric. Commissioner Strain agreed and noted that this area is very car-centric. She added that with the mobile app, there is no point of sales with less stalling and less idling, which are valid concerns from the public. She stated hopefully the amount of time spent in the drive-through is reduced because it can be timed vs. other fast-food entities. Commissioner Beneke added that in any other site in the city, he would not like this at all. He stated he does worry about the traffic in this area, though, and noted there was no discussion about street traffic, while turning left into the lot is a bit of a concern for him. Commissioner Hyman stated she is not comfortable with the plans as presented, and approving this will leave the door open for safety concerns. She noted a woman was killed in 2024 at Knollwood Mall, and she would like to see more safety implemented in the mall before moving forward with further investment in the area. She stated she would like to see the safety improvements displayed visually in a way that would prove they are going to happen before she approves of this plan. Commissioner Flanagan asked what the options are for adding more safety features to the plan. Ms. Champoux stated that the planning commission has the option of tabling the motion to a later planning commission meeting and having new site plans presented. 7 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 20, 2025 It was moved by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Eckholm, to approve the Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use of a portion of 8528 Hwy. 7 from ROW to COM; and to approve a conditional use permit for in-vehicle service and the use of off-site and shared parking for 8528 Hwy. 7 with conditions and to recommend rescinding the special permit and approval of a conditional use permit for 8530 Hwy 7 to allow in-vehicle sales and service and more than one principal building on the site. The motion passed 6-1 (Commissioner Hyman opposed). 4. Other Business. 4a. Election of officers. Ms. Chamberlain explained that the Chair and Vice Chair will be voted on at tonight’s meeting and will serve from the October 2025 meeting through the May 2026 meeting. Commissioner Weber asked if the term has changed from the regular calendar year from January to December. Ms. Chamberlain stated this is in line with the new requirements of board and commission terms. She added that if commissioners have served in the past, they can also serve again. She also stated that staff will provide training as needed for officers. Commissioner Hyman stated she would be interested, but is going to be running for the city council election. Commissioner Flanagan stated he would be open to being chair. Commissioner Strain stated she would be comfortable as vice chair, but not chair, since she is new to the commission. Commissioner Flanagan and Commissioner Strain nominated themselves for Chair and Vice Chair, respectively. The commissioners approved of their nominations. Chair Divecha stated that being chair has been a pleasure and noted that much was accomplished this year, and the staff and the rest of the commission are very supportive and helpful. She asked if staff could do a training refresher on Robert’s Rules for the entire commission. Ms. Chamberlain stated that yes, that can be scheduled. 5. Communications. Ms. Chamberlain stated the zoning survey will be completed this Sunday, August 24, and added that the Vision 4.0 survey is open until the end of September. Ms. Chamberlain also noted future scheduled meeting/event dates:  September 3, 2025 – planning commission study session  September 17, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting  October 8, 2025 – planning commission study session* 8 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 20, 2025  October 15, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting *Meeting held on October 8, 2025, since Yom Kippur is October 1 and 2, 2025 6. Adjournment – 7:15 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison John Flanagan, chair member 9 Planning commission August 20, 2025 7:20 p.m. Planning commission Study Session Unofficial Minutes Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, Sylvie Hyman, Sara Strain, Tom Weber, John Flanagan Members absent: none Staff present: Gary Morrison, Laura Chamberlain 1. Zoning code update (phase 2) Mr. Morrison presented and noted that the draft zoning map will be presented, and the architectural design section of the zoning ordinance will be discussed this evening. Mr. Morrison noted all of the updates requested by the commission to the map: 1. Renames the current MX-1 to MX-2 community mixed-use. 2. Renames the current MX-2 to MX-1 neighborhood mixed-use 3. Converts the office district to MX districts 4. Converts the business park district to MX districts 5. Converts the C-1 neighborhood commercial district to MX-1 neighborhood mixed-use. 6. Converts some C-2 general commercial districts to MX-2 districts. 7. Retains some properties as C-2 general commercial. These properties are currently used as large box retail, shopping centers, and/or motor vehicle sales land uses. They are also located near highway interchanges. It is expected that these uses will continue for the foreseeable future and are reasonably located with direct access to the highway system. Mr. Morrison noted discussion questions for tonight’s meeting: Zoning map: Does the planning commission want to proceed with the draft zoning map knowing that the review of the zoning district standards and uses will be based on the draft zoning map? Commissioner Hyman asked about the MX-1 uses that are things for a neighborhood, and why not convert it to MX-2. Mr. Morrison stated that the only access to the property is from the neighborhood and noted that it might be an option in the future. Commissioner Hyman stated it would be nice to have a restaurant or coffee shop, and something they can actually benefit from. Commissioner Eckholm stated that the fact that the Costco/Home Depot area is still C2 is a signal that there is no good way to sunset those uses, which is disappointing. He stated it is probably best to look at everything else that can be brought to mixed-use. 10 Unofficial minutes Planning commission study session Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Eckholm asked if the old Bremer Bank building could be taken away from this location and guide something else to be done with it, to make that parcel into a mixed-use parcel. Mr. Morrison stated yes, that is possible, and noted there is interest in that property to move it into a different direction. Commissioner Weber stated that if Costco ever moved, and its parcel were then open, the commission could think creatively about this area and then would not be limited by what is happening today with zoning changes. Mr. Morrison stated that is correct. Commissioner Hyman stated the Knollwood Mall is right near the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) and which is a disrespected area. She stated the city could be doing so much more in that area around the creek for people to enjoy it. She added that there is also a lot of litter there, and she would like to see that change also. Commissioner Eckholm stated that there is so much housing on excess railroad land, and added how much housing could be near the creek with a buffer as well. He stated he would want to see a development there. Mr. Morrison stated, however, that much of that land is in the flood plain. Ms. Chamberlain also noted that the city has a good relationship with the MCWD, and they have recently started a more proactive program to work with developers and partner with them earlier to work on sites such as this. Commissioner Weber asked if, when development comes up, the MCWD will also need to approve it. He asked if the city or the MCWD could veto development plans. Mr. Morrison stated that the MCWD is limited to their jurisdiction only. Commissioner Hyman asked where all the uses for districts can be reviewed. Ms. Morrison stated that the uses are found on the city website under zoning, and noted the consultant is also working on putting together a uses table. Commissioner Flanagan asked if the commission could look at bike lanes also within the framework of zoning. Mr. Morrison stated the commission has jurisdiction on property, but not on right of way, which is outside of zoning. He stated, however, that connections with public areas are encouraged through zoning. Commissioner Beneke asked about the Bremer property and if there are any limitations if the zoning is changed there, and if the owner lowers the value of the property. Mr. Morrison stated the owners can make a claim, but the city can rezone it to park and open space and take away all their uses, then the owners could ask the city to buy it. Mr. Morrison noted the commission approved the draft zoning map as presented. Mr. Morrison presented the architectural design ordinance and asked the following:  Should the ordinance continue to focus on materials? 11 Unofficial minutes Planning commission study session Aug. 20, 2025  Should the architectural elements currently found in various zoning districts be consolidated into the architectural section? Commissioner Eckholm stated he likes the idea of not using design elements the commission does not like, but instead uses good judgment, and does not focus on what the place is made of. Commissioner Strain stated she disagrees with that and pointed to the Chipotle architecture as being boring. She stated it would be nice to have more appeal. Commissioner Weber asked if the standards are now moving away from concrete buildings. Mr. Morrison stated there is a limiting factor and noted that when he began with the city, uses were mostly brick, stone, glass, concrete, and copper. He stated that today we are more flexible with materials. Commissioner Eckholm noted that he likes the solar panels outside of Nordic Ware, and they should be set up as a model. Commissioner Hyman asked if the city has requirements that are far beyond what the state is doing. Ms. Chamberlain said the state building materials focus on the actual building code, which the city is not allowed to exceed for building code purposes. She added that as long as buildings meet safety codes and EPA codes, the state leaves it up to individual zoning districts. Mr. Morrison added that the city can regulate aesthetics. Commissioner Weber said he would like to be as lax as possible on this and not clamp down on any one style. He stated there are so many styles already that are beautiful in the city’s 100- year history, so he would like to be flexible on architectural style. Chair Divecha stated in the zoning commentary, many people want housing, but they don’t like the cookie-cutter style, adding that she agrees with that. Commissioner Weber stated he also agrees with this. Chair Divecha stated that if we let the market lead design, then we end up using the cheapest option. Commissioner Eckholm stated that the beauty of this is that the cheapest option changes over time. He stated the styles will change over the years. Chair Divecha stated she agrees to a point on this, but noted she senses that there was a thought of “let’s build something that will last for years”, noting, however, that circumstances were different related to capitalism in years past. Commissioner Eckholm stated he worries more about large investors buying up homes and then renting them out. Chair Divecha said she has no problem with the colors used and would like to not have a limit, allowing for diversity of colors. Mr. Morrison stated that colors have loosened in the last few years. 12 Unofficial minutes Planning commission study session Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Beneke asked if any buildings in the city should not have been built. Commissioner Hyman stated that it is a personal preference. Chair Divecha stated that it was a good question and asked what lessons were learned. Commissioner Hyman stated that near the entrance to the Cedar Lake Trail from 34th St., there is a brand-new house, and the garage is entirely wood slatting, and the rest is brick, and it clashes. Commissioner Eckholm stated that in 20 years, however, the design will be loved. Commissioner Weber noted that Parkway Pizza and the vet office next to it have become a space of community, and the vet office has a rich history, and he would hope they would remain for a long time. He noted the strip mall across the street from there could have been so much more if it were a mixed-use building. Commissioner Hyman stated it would be helpful to incentivize people to use certain materials that are more environmentally friendly and also require materials that stand up to the weather, vs. considering only the architectural design. Mr. Morrison noted the next planning commission meeting is on September 3, 2025, to review the community survey, input, confirm changes to the non-neighborhood districts, and discuss the special provisions article of the zoning code. He stated this includes parking, signs, landscaping, lighting, and architectural design standards. 2. Adjournment – 8:00 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison John Flanagan, chair member 13 Planning commission September 3, 2025 6:00 p.m. Planning commission Study Session Unofficial minutes Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, Sara Strain, Tom Weber, John Flanagan Members absent: Sylvie Hyman Staff present: Gary Morrison Guests: Jeff Miller and Beth Richmond from HKGi presented the report. 1. Zoning Code Update phase 2 – updates to Article V Special Provisions Mr. Miller stated HKGi will present the results of the community survey, which closed at the end of August, and provide an analysis of Article V Special Provisions of the zoning code, including the following topics: parking & loading facilities, landscaping, screening, signage, and community survey results. Mr. Miller stated that the survey questions focused on the neighborhood corridors and commercial spaces and received 240 responses. He reported in detail on the survey results, which are included in the staff report. Commissioner Beneke asked about offset parking. Ms. Richmond stated it relates to restrictions in parking, with the limit of 300 feet from a residential structure and 500 feet from a non-residential structure. Commissioner Divecha added she was pleased to see that more people are not asking for more parking in the survey results. Commissioner Eckholm stated it is difficult to narrow in on what sort of parking issues are a legitimate concern and what are a scarcity mindset from the community, as many issues are emotionally charged. Commissioner Eckholm stated that more parking requirements in certain areas of the city may be a harder sell. Ms. Richmond asked the commissioners if there are parking issues that the planning commission has heard about or areas that should be focused on. Mr. Morrison noted there are many city-owned and maintained parking lots around the city, particularly in the Walker Lake area. He added, over time the city would like to get away from owning and maintaining these parking lots. 14 Unofficial minutes Planning commission study session Sept. 3, 2025 Commissioner Weber stated it would be best to limit parking. Commissioner Divecha asked what the argument for mandating parking is. Ms. Richmond stated that the argument is that businesses will not provide enough parking on their own, and then it becomes an issue if people park on the street and elsewhere. She continued, it is at the multifamily apartments where enough parking has not been provided. Mr. Morrison noted the city has street permit parking around the schools and on Vallacher Ave., and near the Ellipse Apartments. Ms. Richmond stated that, for financing requirements, many times developers must show they have parking for apartment buildings. Commissioner Eckholm stated that the conversation always goes back to there not being enough parking. He stated he is less concerned about restaurants and small businesses, but noted larger commercial businesses will provide ample parking if they feel it is pertinent to their business. Commissioner Weber stated the goals should be to add flexibility to the requirements and let businesses open. Commissioner Eckholm added also, because delivery has increased, many businesses do not need 9 parking spaces any longer, similar to the Chipotle development, which is order and pick up through the drive-through. Commissioner Eckholm stated he would like to take the parking restrictions out of the Walker Lake district. He added that the area around The Block is very busy with parking around the restaurant. He stated it is only a problem here because people are used to parking in front of where they are going. Commissioner Weber asked if, in the Miracle Mile area, there is a way to have a parking code for the neighborhood, and cut parking by 30% by 2050, and if that should be the vision to work toward. Commissioner Eckholm added that if the county is not going to shrink the road, then we need to put the building up right next to the road to make it denser, so drivers go slower. He added, however, that he is not sure how realistic the idea is, especially because Miracle Mile bumps up to neighborhoods on the south side of Excelsior. Mr. Morrison stated the city can work with the residential owners to create alleyways behind their homes to also include parking behind businesses, rather than in front. He added, however, that it comes down to what property owners are willing to do. 15 Unofficial minutes Planning commission study session Sept. 3, 2025 Commissioner Divecha stated that when we require minimums, we are blocking off areas of the city for cars over people. She stated she understands the issue, but it constrains what we want someplace like the Walker Lake area to be. Commissioner Weber stated there are two parking spaces for each classroom at the high school and asked what those spaces are based on. Ms. Richmond stated that these are for two spaces for each classroom for teachers and support staff. Mr. Miller stated he notes the commissioners are interested in expanding parking at Walker Lake to other areas, there is interest in having new construction have more flexibility at Walker Lake, also, and so parking is not as restrictive there. Commissioner Strain asked about what exists in the parking code and if there is flexibility, and if it has to be a permanent easement. She asked if there is a way to get at some of these issues, expand shared parking options, and rely more on traffic reports. Mr. Morrison stated the city does have the ability to be flexible with parking standards, but a CUP that goes before council and documentation that provides a reason for a reduction in parking. He stated CUP is not, however, required to be flexible, and added there is flexibility in transit areas within the code, and within a certain distance to light rail. He added that this is a policy issue for the planning commission and the city council to decide. Commissioner Divecha asked about the CUP. Ms. Richmond stated that currently, off-site parking requires a CUP. Ms. Richmond asked about non-residential areas. She asked if the planning commission would want to adjust or eliminate non-residential. Commissioner Eckholm stated that for M2 and M3, for more mixes and uses in the bigger areas, there are more single-use buildings, and if we encourage this, the mix of uses does not occur. Mr. Morrison stated that in Walker Lake, the parking helps to encourage mixed use. Commissioner Eckholm stated he would like to get rid of minimums for parking where the commission can. Commissioner Weber stated that this discussion by the planning commission will need to be presented to the city council and then agreed upon by at least 4 council members to move forward. Commissioner Divecha stated the planning commission needs to take this further, though. Commissioner Weber stated that the planning commission will have more opportunities to respond to parking. Mr. Morrison added that working to fine-tune parking is a big first step. 16 Unofficial minutes Planning commission study session Sept. 3, 2025 Chair Flanagan asked about timelines and how soon we can see if it works, so the discussions can keep going. Mr. Morrison stated that staff will update the city council in October regarding parking. Ms. Richmond explained alternative landscaping, special design features, such as rain gardens, native landscaping, and more creative ways of keeping property. She stated this section is very subjective and does not provide guidance vs. regular requirements. Mr. Morrison stated that the intent is to show that landscaping is not always only trees. Commissioner Weber noted the city is losing tree canopy and asked if there are ways to be creative on replacement through the zoning code. Ms. Richmond noted that the screening discussion will move into its own separate section and will be looked at within the parking lots. She stated that signage cannot be regulated now because of free speech, but no big changes to signs are allowed. She added that super graphic signs and murals will also be reviewed, while being content-neutral. Ms. Richmond stated the next discussion with the planning commission will be in October to discuss procedures, definitions, and general zoning provisions. Mr. Miller stated there will be more discussions and that parking may move out of this process for further in-depth discussion. Commissioner Eckholm agreed. Commissioner Divecha stated she would be interested in some case studies on parking as well, with more robust discussion. Future scheduled meeting/event dates: September 17, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting October 8, 2025 – planning commission study session* October 15, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting November 5, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting *Meeting held on October 8, 2025 (Yom Kippur is October 1 and 2) Adjournment – 8:00 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison John Flanagan, chair member 17 Planning commission: Regular meeting Meeting date: October 15, 2025 Agenda item: 3.a 3.a Bickham Court planned unit development amendment Executive summary Location: 2753, 2759, 2760, and 2768 Louisiana Court Case Number: 25-05-PUD Applicant: Trellis Co., Elisabeth Michels Owner: Trellis Co. Review Deadline: 60 days: November 22, 2025 120 days: January 21, 2026 Recommended motions: Chair to open the public hearing, take testimony and close the hearing. Motion to recommend approval of the amendment to the Louisiana Court PUD subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Summary of request: Trellis Co. has applied for a planned unit development (PUD) amendment for the Bickham Court apartments on Louisiana Court. The request is to allow a new one-story building to provide resident services and community amenity space at the Bickham Court apartment complex. The new building is proposed to have an area of 2,640 square feet and will be located in the northwest corner of the Bickham Court apartment complex. The project would also allow office in one of the existing buildings to return to residential use. The proposed project requires an amendment to an existing PUD on the property, which was approved via Resolution No. 01- 038. Supporting documents: Resolution No. 01-038 with the original site plan (Sheet PUD1), proposed site plan, building elevations, landscaping plan, project narrative, and parking utilization report Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director 18 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment Discussion Site information Bickham Court is made up of five 3-story apartment buildings at the end of the Louisiana Court cul-de-sac. Site area (acres): 2.17 acres Current use: Surrounding land uses & zoning: 5 low-rise apartment dwelling buildings North: Low impact manufacturing / IP East: Low-rise apartment dwellings / N-3 South: Single-unit detached dwellings / N-2 West: Park/recreation / POS Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning RH – high density residential N-3 Neighborhood 3 Background The Bickham Court apartments were built in 1963 as part of the larger Louisiana Court subdivision. In 2000 Project for Pride in Living (PPL) had ownership over most of the properties on Louisiana Court and applied for a PUD to make updates to all the properties. A summary of these approvals follows: 19 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment Approval Date Res. No. 00-042 (PUD) & Res. No. 00-043 (VAR) Approves preliminary PUD for Louisiana Ct. and establishes how the PUD varies from the underlying zoning district (R-C). • Reduced parking requirement, • Reduced building setbacks, and • Reduced drive aisle width for parking areas. Applies to the following properties: 2704, 2705, 2711, 2717, 2722, 2730, 2741, 2742, 2753, 2754, 2760, and 2765 Louisiana Court and 2740 and 2750 Louisiana Avenue South April 17, 2000 Res. No. 00-065 Approves an amendment to the preliminary PUD and approves the final PUD for Louisiana Ct. • Includes all of the elements from the preliminary PUD • An office space proposed at 2722 Louisiana Ct. was amended to become a separate structure, requiring some additional setback reductions Applies to the same properties as Res. No. 00-042 May 15, 2000 Res. No. 01-038 Amends and restates Res. No. 00-065 • Adds 2759 and 2765 Louisiana Ct. to the PUD • Addition of a transit stop with bus pull out lane at Louisiana Avenue and 28th Street and establishment of easements for the transit stop and shelter • Limits the number of residential units to 185 total units • Updates the parking reduction numbers to include the parking and garage on 2759 and 2765 Louisiana Ct. May 7, 2001 Present considerations Trellis Louisiana Court Acquisition LLC, owner of Bickham Court, requests that the current PUD be amended to allow for the new construction of a community building that will serve project residents. The community building will provide common gathering and meeting space for residents, office space for supportive services workers serving Bickham Court residents, and an office for property management staff. This will also allow space in one of the existing buildings that is being used as an office to return to use as an apartment unit. Requested approvals • Amend and restate Res. No. 01-038 approving a final planned unit development (PUD) 20 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment to allow for the construction of a community building on 2760 and 2768 Louisiana Ct. o Requires public hearing, planning commission recommendation, and city council approval. • Combine parcels of 2760 and 2768 Ct. via an administrative subdivision. o Requires review and approval by city staff. o Made a condition of approval for PUD amendment Proposed site plan Zoning analysis The following table provides the development metrics. The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans, establish the development requirements for this property if approved. Further details on some of the zoning items are provided below. Lot and site dimension standards Factor Required Proposed Met? Lot Area (min) 9,100 square feet The combination of the lots of 2760 and 2768 Louisiana Ct will result in a parcel area of 0.87 acres, or 37,897 square feet Yes 21 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment Factor Required Proposed Met? Lot Width (min) 70 feet The combination of the lots of 2760 and 2768 Louisiana Ct will result in a parcel width of 175 feet Yes Yard Setbacks [Measurements below are for the proposed new building] Front Yard (min) 15 feet 90 feet Yes Interior Side Yard (min) 10 feet 130.8 feet 127.8 feet Yes Rear Yard (min) 10 feet 10 feet Yes Perimeter Yard (min) 10 feet / 20 feet if adjacent to N-1 or N-2 districts 10 feet Yes Height (max) 75 feet 20.5 feet Yes Distance between buildings (min) ½ the building height 2760 Louisiana Ct. has a building height of 32.5 feet, so minimum of 16.3 feet 21.8 feet Yes DORA (min) 12% The existing Bickham Court area currently has 7.6% DORA 7.2% Yes Impervious surface coverage (max) 80% The combination of the lots of 2760 and 2768 Louisiana Ct will have 66.6% impervious Yes District specific standards: 1. All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers stored outdoors shall be screened in accordance with screening regulations provided in this chapter. Adding a trash enclosure is a condition of approval. 2. All utility lines including electric, gas, water, sanitary sewer, telephone, and television cable shall be placed underground when used with all new structures or additions which expand the gross square footage of a structure by more than 50 percent unless used for service to single-unit, two-unit, or three-unit dwellings. In addition, any new service to an existing building other than a single-unit or two-unit dwelling shall be placed underground. Standard met. 3. All access roads shall have a poured-in-place concrete curb measuring at least six inches above and below the grade in all developments except developments of single-unit, two-unit, or three-unit dwellings. Standard met. 22 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment 4. Interior pedestrian circulation and pedestrian linkage to any existing public trails or sidewalks shall be provided where practically possible for all developments except developments of single-unit, two-unit, or three-unit dwellings. Standard met. 5. For N-3 and N-4 districts, all dwelling units shall be at or above the grade of all land abutting the structure within a distance of 25 feet from all faces of the building. Not applicable. Use-specific standards - Use: Dwelling, apartment (low-rise) - Permission: Permitted with Standards - Conditions: Dwelling, apartment (low-rise) a. Lot access. Standard met. 1. Lot access for any low-rise apartment dwelling shall abide by the lot access standards as required for dwelling, townhouse above. 2. If a lot is not adjacent to an alley but is a corner lot or a through lot, then driveway access shall be off the street with the lower functional class as defined by the comprehensive plan. 3. A driveway existing as of March 3, 2025 that does not meet the above lot access standards can continue in the same location until the property is redeveloped. Such driveway may be expanded as long as it is in conformance with the city code. b. Individual dwelling unit entrances for ground floor units may be interior or exterior entrances. Not applicable. c. Any driveways or parking areas within 30 feet of a property zoned N-1 or N-2 shall be screened. Such screening may consist of a solid hedge, an architectural compatible opaque wall, fence, berm or combination thereof. Not applicable. d. To qualify as age-restricted housing, it must provide the following: Not applicable. 1. A minimum of 1,000 square feet of lot area for each dwelling unit. 2. A lounge or other inside community rooms equal in aggregate size to a minimum of 15 square feet for each unit. 3. A recorded covenant to run with the land, executed in a form approved by the city, which restricts the use of the property to occupancy by age. Special provisions Factor Required Proposed Met? Off-Street Parking Vehicle Parking Parking approved in PUD (Res. 01-038) Off-street parking: 45 Garage parking: 12 On-street parking: 16 Proof of parking: 2 Total parking: 75 Off-street parking: 42 Garage parking: 12 On-street parking: 16 Proof of parking: 0 Total parking: 70 PUD may adjust required parking 23 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment Off-street parking: Vehicle parking: The existing PUD on the property shows 45 off-street parking spaces, 12 garage parking spaces, 16 on-street parking spaces, and “proof-of-parking” for 2 additional spaces on the west and north parking lots. The proposed project is getting rid of the proof-of-parking spaces, and removing 3 existing parking spaces from the north parking lot to accommodate the new building as well as a new location for trash and recycling collection. As the proposed use of the new building is to have an office to provide services that are already currently being provided at the apartments, so no additional traffic or parking needs are anticipated due to the project. Factor Required Proposed Met? Applicant has submitted parking utilization information, showing current parking lots are 68% full at peak times and 25% at off- peak times. EV Parking Existing PUD did not require any EV spaces. No additional parking is proposed. Yes Bicycle parking The existing development has outside parking for 12 bikes. No additional parking is proposed. Yes Landscaping Tree removal / replacement Total inches on site: 138 cal. in. of significant trees Total inches removed: 67 cal. in. of significant trees Required tree replacement: 59.1 caliper inches Proposed: 3 trees at 7.5 caliper inches Remainder: 51.6 inches at $225 per inch Fee-in-lieu: $11,610 Condition of approval Architectural design Building Materials Class 1: 60% min [for faces visible off-site] Class 3: 10% max Face Class 1 Class 2 Visible off site? Yes North 85.2% 14.8% Y East 67.3% 32.7% N South 47.6% 52.4% N West 65.3% 34.7% Y Shadowing Does not exceed 50% for more than 2 hours Does not cast shadow on buildings on adjacent property Yes 24 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment The applicant provided a parking utilization count with their application. It showed that even at peak usage times, parking within their lots are 68% full at a maximum. Utilization during off- peak times is around 25% utilization. With this information, staff find the proposed removal of 3 spaces and 2 proof-of-parking spaces will still meet the vehicle parking needs of the site. EV parking: No EV parking was required with the original PUD. As the proposed project does not add any parking spaces, no EV parking is required for this request. Staff find the project meets EV parking requirements Bicycle parking: The existing site currently has 12 bicycle parking spaces on exterior racks; no additional bicycle parking racks are proposed. Staff find the project meets bicycle parking requirements. Landscaping: Tree removal / replacement: There are currently 13 significant trees on the properties 2760 and 2768 Louisiana Ct., with a cumulative 138 caliper inches. The project proposes to remove 9 trees (67 caliper inches) and protect 4 trees (71 caliper inches). There are no heritage trees currently on the site. Up to 20% of existing significant caliper inches can be removed without requiring replacement; after that, trees are required to be replaced at a rate of 1.5 caliper inches for each 1.0 caliper inch removed. The project requires 59.1 caliper inches in tree replacement – the applicant proposes the planting of 3 new trees, at 2.5 caliper inches each, resulting in a remainder of 51.6 caliper inches to be replaced via fee-in-lieu. The project will need to pay $11,610 for fee-in-lieu tree replacement as a condition of approval; with this, staff find the project meets tree replacement requirements. Architectural design: Building materials: All buildings not used for single-unit or two-unit dwellings are required to have a minimum of 60% class 1 building materials on any building face that is facing adjacent properties/off-site. The proposed new community building can be seen off-site on the north and west faces. The faces have 85.2% and 65.3% class 1 materials respectively. No class 3 building materials are proposed on the building’s exterior. Staff find the project meets building material requirements. Shadowing: The proposed new community building is a one-story building and is not close to buildings on adjacent properties. As such, it does not cast a shadow on adjacent properties’ buildings. Staff find the project meets shadowing requirements. 25 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment Next steps: City council is scheduled to consider the amendment to the PUD on November 3, 2025. Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the PUD approved via Resolution No. 01-038 for 2753, 2759, 2760, and 2768 Louisiana Court subject to the following conditions: 1. The amendment shall be conditional upon the approval of the administrative lot combination, submitted to city staff on September 23, 2025. 2. The applicant shall meet tree replacement requirements either through a fee-in-lieu for tree replacements or through additional plantings or some combination, as determined by city code. 3. Prior to city council approval, the applicant shall update the official exhibits to show details of an enclosure for the new trash and recycling area, in compliance with city code. 4. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved official exhibits, and city code. 5. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 6. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. b. All necessary permits shall be obtained. 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. Payment of warranty for landscaping and tree replacement fees. 8. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d. The city shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the city engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f. The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. 26 Regular meeting meeting of October 15, 2025 (Item No. 3.a) Title: Bickham Court planned unit development amendment g. Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 9. All mechanical equipment shall be fully screened. Rooftop equipment may be located as indicated in the official exhibits so as not to be visible from off-site. 27 28 29 30 31 Bickham Court parcels 32 & 67 67 %%4 %&+ %% 4 %%4 (;,67,1*$3$570(17 %8,/',1* (;,67,1*$3$570(17 %8,/',1* (;,67,1*$3$570(17 %8,/',1* (;,67,1*$3$570(17 %8,/',1* (;,67,1*$3$570(17 %8,/',1* (;,67,1* *$5$*(67$//6 1(:$'0,1&20081,7< %8,/',1* (;,67,1*$3$570(17 %8,/',1*1,& /28,6,$1$&2857 1 1(::$67( 5(&<&/$%/(63,&.83 /2&$7,212&&83,(663$&(2) (;,67,1*3$5.,1*67$//672%( 5(029('/2&$7,21:,//,1&/8'($ 1(:5(&</&,1*'80367(5:,7+ &$3$&,7<2)&8%,&<$5'63$5.,1*67$//72%(5(029(' 72$&&202'$7(1(:%8,/',1* )22735,171(:&85%&87 *$5$*(6287+:$//72%( 67$%,/,=(',13/$&(:$7(572%( 0,7,*$7(':,7+1(:'5$,17,/($7 (;7(5,252)6287+(51:$// (;,67,1*:$67( 5(&<&/$%/(63,&.83 /2&$7,21725(0$,1 (;,67,1*5(&<&/$%/(6 &$3$&,7<(67,0$7('72 %(&8%,&<$5'6 67$1'$5'3$5.,1*67$//6 6 7 $ 1 ' $ 5 ' 3 $ 5 . , 1 * 6 7 $ / / 6 6 7 $ 1 ' $ 5 ' 3 $ 5 . , 1 * 6 7 $ / / 6 6 7 $ 1 ' $ 5 ' 3 $ 5 . , 1 * 6 7 $ / / 6 $ & & ( 6 6 , % / ( 3 $ 5 . , 1 * 6 7 $ / / 6 35(9,286:$67( 5(&<&/$%/(6 3,&.83/2&$7,21 (;,67,1*3$9(5672%(5(029(' $63$572)6,7(:25. ,17(17)251(: &21&5(7(3$7+:$<6 3$7&+(;,67,1* %,780,1286 3$9(0(175(3/$&( &85%6$6 1(&(66$5< 3$7&+(;,67,1* %,780,1286 3$9(0(175(3/$&( &85%6$6 1(&(66$5< 3$7&+(;,67,1* %,780,1286 3$9(0(175(3/$&( &85%6$6 1(&(66$5< %,.(5$&. /2236 %,.(5$&. /2236 %$UFKLWHFWXUHODOVXPHQW 3 5 (/,0 ,1 $5 < '5 $:,1 *6 1 2 7 )2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 &7 ,2 1 %$3URMHFW1XPEHU 0DUVKDOO6WUHHW1(6XLWH 0LQQHDSROLV01 LQIR#EOXPHQWDOVFRP 9(5,)<$//(;,67,1*&216758&7,21 ',0(16,216(/(9$7,216$1' &21',7,216%()25(67$57,1*$1< &216758&7,215(9,(:$1< ',6&5(3$1&,(6:,7+7+($5&+,7(&7 $'-8671(:&216758&7,21$6 5(48,5(' (;,67,1*&21',7,216 ,668(65(9,6,216 $ 0 $ %LFNKDP&RXUW$SDUWPHQWV 5HQRYDWLRQDQG1HZ &RPPXQLW\%XLOGLQJ /RXLVLDQD&W 6W/RXLV3DUN01 6,7(3/$1 6,7(3/$1 (;,67,1*81,77$%8/$7,21 81 , 7 %( ' 5 2 2 0 6 %$ 7 + 5 2 2 0 6 &2 8 1 7 $5 ( $ &2 0 0 ( 1 7 6 81,7$ 6) 81,7% 6) 81,7& 6) 81,7' 6) 81,7( 6) 81,7) 6) 6725<81,7 81,7$ 6) 81,7% 6) 81,7& 6) 81,7' 6) 81,7( 6) 81,7) 6) 6725<81,7 81,7$ 6) 81,7% 6) 81,7& 6) 727$/180%(52) 81,76 1(:&216758&7,21 1(:$'0,1%8,/',1* 6) (;,67,1*3$5.,1*&2817 7<3(&2817 *$5$*(6 67$1'$5' 1257+/27 67$1'$5' 1257+:(67/27 67$1'$5' 6287+:(67/27 $'$ 67$1'$5' 727$/67$//6 352326('1(:3$5.,1*&2817 7<3(&2817 *$5$*(6 67$1'$5' 1257+/27 67$1'$5' 1257+:(67/27 67$1'$5' 6287+:(67/27 $'$ 67$1'$5' 727$/67$//6 &LW\6XEPLWWDO &LW\6XEPLWWDO 33 *5$'( : & *5$'( ::::: *5$'( 3$,17('9(57,&$/6+,3/$3 &20326,7(6,',1* 35(),1,6+('0(7$/ )$6&,$7<3 $63+$/76+,1*/(522) 1,&+,+$$5&+,7(&785$/ :$//3$1(/:9*5229( 3$,17('9(57,&$/6+,3/$3 &20326,7(6,',1* : : : & :: *5$'( : & :: %$UFKLWHFWXUHODOVXPHQW 3 5 (/,0 ,1 $5 < '5 $:,1 *6 1 2 7 )2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 &7 ,2 1 %$3URMHFW1XPEHU 0DUVKDOO6WUHHW1(6XLWH 0LQQHDSROLV01 LQIR#EOXPHQWDOVFRP 9(5,)<$//(;,67,1*&216758&7,21 ',0(16,216(/(9$7,216$1' &21',7,216%()25(67$57,1*$1< &216758&7,215(9,(:$1< ',6&5(3$1&,(6:,7+7+($5&+,7(&7 $'-8671(:&216758&7,21$6 5(48,5(' (;,67,1*&21',7,216 ,668(65(9,6,216 3 0 $ %LFNKDP&RXUW$SDUWPHQWV 5HQRYDWLRQDQG1HZ &RPPXQLW\%XLOGLQJ /RXLVLDQD&W 6W/RXLV3DUN01 %8,/',1*(/(9$7,216 1(: $'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1* ($67(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1* 1257+(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1* 6287+(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1* :(67(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1* 0$7(5,$/48$17,7,(61(:$'0,1 0$7(5,$/7<3( $5($ 2)(/(9 6287+(/(9$7,21 &/$66,6) &/$66,, 6) 6) 1257+(/(9$7,21 &/$66,6) &/$66,, 6) 6) :(67(/(9$7,21 &/$66,6) &/$66,, 6) 6) ($67(/(9$7,21 &/$66,6) &/$66,, 6) 6) &LW\6XEPLWWDO &LW\6XEPLWWDO 34 %$UFKLWHFWXUHODOVXPHQW 3 5 (/,0 ,1 $5 < '5 $:,1 *6 1 2 7 )2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 &7 ,2 1 %$3URMHFW1XPEHU 0DUVKDOO6WUHHW1(6XLWH 0LQQHDSROLV01 LQIR#EOXPHQWDOVFRP 9(5,)<$//(;,67,1*&216758&7,21 ',0(16,216(/(9$7,216$1' &21',7,216%()25(67$57,1*$1< &216758&7,215(9,(:$1< ',6&5(3$1&,(6:,7+7+($5&+,7(&7 $'-8671(:&216758&7,21$6 5(48,5(' (;,67,1*&21',7,216 ,668(65(9,6,216 3 0 $ %LFNKDP&RXUW$SDUWPHQWV 5HQRYDWLRQDQG1HZ &RPPXQLW\%XLOGLQJ /RXLVLDQD&W 6W/RXLV3DUN01 %8,/',1*(/(9$7,216 1(: $'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1* 6287+(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1*:,7+&217(;7 1257+(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1*:,7+&217(;7 :(67(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1*:,7+&217(;7 ($67(/(9$7,21 1(:$'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1*:,7+&217(;7 &LW\6XEPLWWDO &LW\6XEPLWWDO 35 %$UFKLWHFWXUHODOVXPHQW 3 5 (/,0 ,1 $5 < '5 $:,1 *6 1 2 7 )2 5 &2 1 6 7 5 8 &7 ,2 1 %$3URMHFW1XPEHU 0DUVKDOO6WUHHW1(6XLWH 0LQQHDSROLV01 LQIR#EOXPHQWDOVFRP 9(5,)<$//(;,67,1*&216758&7,21 ',0(16,216(/(9$7,216$1' &21',7,216%()25(67$57,1*$1< &216758&7,215(9,(:$1< ',6&5(3$1&,(6:,7+7+($5&+,7(&7 $'-8671(:&216758&7,21$6 5(48,5(' (;,67,1*&21',7,216 ,668(65(9,6,216 3 0 $ %LFNKDP&RXUW$SDUWPHQWV 5HQRYDWLRQDQG1HZ &RPPXQLW\%XLOGLQJ /RXLVLDQD&W 6W/RXLV3DUN01 6+$'2:678'< 1(: $'0,1,675$7,9(%8,/',1* 6+$'2:678'< '(&(0%(530 6+$'2:678'< '(&(0%(5$0 6+$'2:678'< 0$5&+6(37(0%(5$06+$'2:678'< 0$5&+6(37(0%(530 6+$'2:678'< -81($06+$'2:678'< -81(30 &LW\6XEPLWWDO 0+)$3UHOLPLQDU\&' 6HW 36 003 009 008 007 006 004 005 010 011 PROPOSED NEW BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. TREE PROTECTION FENCE PER DETAIL WORK LIMITS PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PARKING LOT TO REMAIN EX I S T I N G P A R K I N G L O T T O R E M A I N PROPERTY LINE PR O P E R T Y L I N E LOUISIANA COURT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. P A V I N G P E R C I V I L PA V I N G P E R C I V I L WO R K L I M I T S WO R K L I M I T S TREE PRESERVATION ENLARGEMENT B/A Project Number:624-23 Louisiana Ct. Apartments 1600 Marshall Street NE, Suite 1 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612/331-2222 info@blumentals.com ••NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRELIM I N A R Y CD SET 1 BArchitecturel alsument VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND CONDITIONS BEFORE STARTING ANY CONSTRUCTION. REVIEW ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH THE ARCHITECT. ADJUST NEW CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED. EXISTING CONDITIONS ISSUES / REVISIONS MINNESOTA Benjamin Hartberg, PLA #48084 I hearby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of sign date License No. 2759 Louisiana Ct. St. Louis Park, MN 55426 08-20-2025 MHFA PRELIMINARY CD SET 1 www.bkbm.com 6120 Earle Brown Dr., Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55340 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 DESIGN GROUP 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: (651) 788-9018 www.calyxdesigngroup.com Landscape Architecture | Planning Landscape Architect: Civil Engineer: PRELIM I N A R Y 09-10-2025 CITY COMMENTS SET 2 L1.1 TREE PRESERVATION & MITIGATION PLAN CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK TREE PRESERVATION REQUIREMENTS: Chapter 36, Article 1 - Sec. 4. Protection of trees. No building material, machines or equipment of any description shall be piled near any street tree unless such tree is first sufficiently protected by a proper guard and/or tree protection fencing as described in Section 36-364 to prevent possible injury, and all instructions issued for that purpose by the Director must be promptly complied with by the owner or contractor. Tree protection fence shall be in place prior to the start of any construction activities including the mobilization of materials and equipment. All tree protection fencing posts shall be 5-feet on center max. Per city code. Chapter 36, Article V - Sec. 12. Allowable tree removal. 1. Up to twenty (20) percent of the diameter inches of significant trees on any parcel may be removed without replacement requirements. Replacement according to the tree replacement schedule is required when removal exceeds more than twenty (20) percent of the total significant tree diameter inches. 2. Replacement according to the tree replacement schedule is required for removal of all heritage tree diameter inches. 3. Diseased, dead, or structurally unsound trees are exempt from the provision ofthis section. The City Forester will make the final determination of whether a tree is diseased, dead or structurally unsound. Tree replacement schedule. Tree removals over the allowable tree removal limit on the parcel shall be replaced according to the following schedule: 1. Significant trees shall be replaced with new trees at a rate of one and one half (1.5) caliper inch replaced for every one (1) diameter inch removed. 2. Heritage trees shall be replaced with new trees at a rate of two (2) caliper inches replaced for every one (1) diameter inch removed. 1 L1.1 EXISTING TREE PROTECTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE DRIP LINE NOTE: TREE PROTECTION SHALL BE PROVIDED BY CONTRACTOR AS REQUIRED TO AIDE IN SURVIVABILITY OF EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. DO NOT STORE MATERIALS OR DRIVE EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE TREE DRIP LINE AS DESIGNATED ABOVE. MAINTAIN THE FENCE INTEGRITY AT ALL TIMES THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. TREE PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION. PLANELEVATION 4' FENCE WITH POSTS @ 8' O.C. (MAX.) AT EDGE OF CRITICAL ROOT ZONE (A RADIUS OF 1-1/2 FEET FOR EVERY 1 INCH OF DBH FOR THE TREE TRUNK OF THE TREE BEING PRESERVED. REFER TO PLAN FOR LOCATION. SEE NOTE BELOW IF TREE IS SURROUNDED BY PAVING. TREE NOTED TO REMAIN LANDSCAPE MATERIALS LEGEND: Existing Tree to Remain Existing Tree to Remove Tree Protection Fence Existing Wooded Area to Remain TREE REMOVALS CHART: Tree Inventory Area 37 PROPOSED NEW BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. WORK LIMITS PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PARKING LOT EX I S T I N G P A R K I N G L O T T O R E M A I N PR O P E R T Y L I N E LOUISIANA COURT EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN, TYP. ENTRY EN T R Y EN T R Y PAVING PER CIVIL P A V I N G P E R C I V I L P A V I N G P E R C I V I L PA V I N G P E R C I V I L BASIN PER CIVIL NATIVE SEED PER NOTES TURF SOD TURF SOD TURF SOD TURF SOD TURF SOD TO DISTURBED LIMITS. FIELD VERIFY TURF SOD TO DISTURBED LIMITS. FIELD VERIFY WOOD MULCH AND EDGER PER NOTES WOOD MULCH AND EDGER PER NOTES WOOD MULCH MAINTENANCE STRIP PER DETAIL TURF SOD TO DISTURBED LIMITS. FIELD VERIFY TURF SOD TO DISTURBED LIMITS. FIELD VERIFY 2 QB 1 GI 8 Ck 3 Am 3 Am 5 Tt 7 Dl 6 Ck WO R K L I M I T S WO R K L I M I T S CLEAR AND GRUB BRUSH APPROXIMATELY 6 FEET FROM BUILDING FOOTPRINT. FIELD VERIFY. LANDSCAPE PLAN B/A Project Number:624-23 Louisiana Ct. Apartments 1600 Marshall Street NE, Suite 1 Minneapolis, MN 55413 612/331-2222 info@blumentals.com ••NOT FO R C O N S T R U C T I O N PRELIM I N A R Y CD SET 1 BArchitecturel alsument VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONSTRUCTION DIMENSIONS, ELEVATIONS AND CONDITIONS BEFORE STARTING ANY CONSTRUCTION. REVIEW ANY DISCREPANCIES WITH THE ARCHITECT. ADJUST NEW CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED. EXISTING CONDITIONS ISSUES / REVISIONS MINNESOTA Benjamin Hartberg, PLA #48084 I hearby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of sign date License No. 2759 Louisiana Ct. St. Louis Park, MN 55426 08-20-2025 MHFA PRELIMINARY CD SET 1 www.bkbm.com 6120 Earle Brown Dr., Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55340 Phone: (763) 843-0420 Fax: (763) 843-0421 DESIGN GROUP 475 Cleveland Ave. N, Suite 101A St. Paul, MN 55104 Phone: (651) 788-9018 www.calyxdesigngroup.com Landscape Architecture | Planning Landscape Architect: Civil Engineer: PRELIM I N A R Y 09-10-2025 CITY COMMENTS SET 2 L1.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: PROPOSED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE: 2,668 sf Building use: Multifamily Unit 1 TREE PER 1000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA: 2,668 sf / 1000 = 3 Trees Required per City Code 6 SHRUBS PER 1000 SQUARE FEET OF BUILDING AREA: 2,668 sf / 1000 = 3 x 6 = 18 Shrubs Required per City Code Number of Trees Required: 3 Number of Shrubs Required: 18 Number of Trees Proposed: 3 Number of Shrubs Proposed: 18 SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER QTY OVERSTORY TREE GI Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Skycole` TM Skyline Thornless Honey Locust 2.5" Cal.B&B 1 QB Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2.5" Cal.B&B 2 SHRUBS Am Aronia melanocarpa `Morton` TM Iroquis Beauty Black Chokeberry 5 gal.Pot 6 Dl Diervilla lonicera Dwarf Bush Honeysuckle 3 gal.Pot 7 GRASSES Ck Calamagrostis x acutiflora `Karl Foerster`Feather Reed Grass 1 gal.Pot 14 EVERGREEN SHRUB Tt Taxus x media `Tauntonii`Tauton Yew 3 gal.Pot 5 PLANT SCHEDULE GENERAL NOTES: 01. See Civil Engineer's plans for site plan layout and dimensions. 02. Protect adjacent areas from damage during construction. 03.See Civil Engineer's details for paving and curb information. 1 L1.2 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING - SECTION NOT TO SCALE TREE PLANTING REQUIREMENTS: -REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE, WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM THE TOP-THIRD OF THE ROOT BALL AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. -REMOVE THE WIRE BASKET DOWN TO THE SECOND HORIZONTAL WIRE FROM THE BOTTOM AND DISPOSE OF OFF-SITE. -EXPOSE ROOT FLARE AND SET AT GRADE STAKE TREES AS NEEDED TO MAINTAIN AN UPRIGHT AND PLUMB HABIT. USE NON-MARRING TREE-GUY WEBBING AND CABLES OR STAKES. INSTALL 6" WHITE DRAIN TILE TRUNK GUARD MARK THE NORTH SIDE OF THE TREE IN THE NURSERY, AND ROTATE TREE TO FACE NORTH AT THE SITE WHEN EVER POSSIBLE. 4 IN. HIGH EARTH SAUCER BEYOND EDGE OF ROOT BALL (FOR ISOLATED TREES ONLY). REMOVE ALL TWINE, ROPE AND WIRE, AND BURLAP FROM TOP THIRD OF ROOT BALL. PLACE ROOT BALL ON UNEXCAVATED OR TAMPED SOIL. NOTE: FOR DIMENSIONS OF PLANTING AREAS SEE PLAN, SOIL BACKFILL SHALL BE GARDEN BLEND SOIL ( EQUAL MIX OF COMPOST, SAND & SOIL ) PER NOTES. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WITH FOOT PRESSURE SO THAT ROOT BALL DOES NOT SHIFT. WOOD MULCH. DO NO PLACE MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. MAINTAIN THE MULCH WEED-FREE FOR AFTER PLANTING. NOTES: OPEN BURLAP AND REMOVE EXCESS SOIL UNTIL THE TOP OF THE FIRST MAJOR ROOT IS VISIBLE. PLANT TO THIS DEPTH TO HELP PREVENT ENCIRCLING ROOTS. ONLY PRUNE DEAD BRANCHES THE FIRST YEAR AFTER PLANTING. MULCH RING: 4' DIAMETER MINIMUM, 6' DIAMETER PREFERRED. DOUBLE STAKE WITH WIRE: #12 GALVANIZED WIRE THROUGH THE EYE OF THE CINCH-TIE RUBBER SUPPORT. AVOID DAMAGE TO THE ROOT BALL WITH SUPPORT STAKES. NURSERY GRADE FIBERGLASS TREE STAKES. 11/16" x 6'-0". LANDSCAPE MATERIALS LEGEND: Proposed Turf Sod Proposed Landscape Edger per Landscape Notes Existing Tree to Remain Proposed Wood Mulch per Landscape Notes Proposed Native Seed per Landscape Notes Tree Inventory Area 38 Land Use Narrative Bickham Court, formerly a program of Perspectives in St. Louis Park, is a recovery-focused, affordable housing community with the mission of mothers experiencing mental illness or chemical dependency and their children. Resident families are often referred to the project through the Coordinated Entry system, domestic violence providers, shelters, and substance abuse providers. Families receive extensive supportive services provided by Missions Inc. while living at Bickham Court. Bickham Court currently has 54 housing units. Two additional units are currently being utilized by property management and supportive services. Trellis plans to relocate these offices and service spaces to the new community building, then turn back the housing units to serve two additional families for a total of 56 housing units. The proposed renovation will continue to utilize the property in its current multifamily residential use, with the addition of a community building/management office to serve the Bickham Court residents. The community building will provide critical community space for resident meetings, including AA/NA meetings, support groups, life skills classes, with childcare available on-site during group sessions. Private offices for Missions staff will be constructed for one-on-one meetings with residents. 39 ϙ -LP0R\$,$ 3ULQFLSDO3UHVLGHQW &(2 $QG\6ZDUW]$,$ 3ULQFLSDO9LFH3UHVLGHQW 'DQ1R\HV 3ULQFLSDO 0DUVKDOO6W1(6XLWH 0LQQHDSROLV01 ZZZEOXPHQWDOVFRP ÍŘħĖĲČϙťĖīĖƏÍťĖĺĲϙťŪîƅϡϙĖèħēÍıϙĺŪŘťϙŕÍŘťıôĲťŜϙ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²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