Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2025/10/06 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA OCTOBER 6, 2025 6:00 p.m. Economic Development Authority meeting 1. Call to order 2. Approve agenda 3. Minutes a. EDA meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 4. Consent items. a. Approve EDA disbursements b. Resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Pre-Development grant for affordable commercial spaces - Ward 1 c. Resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development grant for Wooddale Station redevelopment - Ward 2 d. Resolution authorizing an amendment for the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development - Union Park Flats Project - Ward 2 5. Public hearings – none. 6. Regular business – none. 7. Communications and announcements – none. 8. Adjournment. 6:15 p.m. City council meeting – Council Chambers 1. Call to order a. Roll call. b. Pledge of Allegiance. 2. Approve agenda. 3. Presentations. a. Recognition of 2025 Evergreen award recipients b. Proclamation observing National Disability Employment Awareness Month c. Proclamation observing Indigenous Peoples Day d. Recognition of donations 4. Minutes. a. Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 b. Special study session meeting minutes of August 18, 2025 c. City council meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 d. Study session meeting minutes of September 8, 2025 Agenda EDA, city council and special study session meetings of October 6, 2025 5.Consent items. a.Approve city disbursements b.Resolution accepting donations to the parks and recreation department c.Resolution accepting donations to the police department for police investigation d.Resolution accepting a donation to the police department for K9 officers e.Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on Wayzata Boulevard east of Ford Road - Ward 4 f.Resolution authorizing parking prohibitions on South Service Drive of Highway 7 - Ward 1 g.Resolution authorizing removal of parking prohibitions near 3312 Gorham Avenue - Ward 3 h.Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 -Ward 1 i.Approve city council travel for National League of Cities City Summit Conference in 2025 j.Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Minnesota Housing Local Housing Trust Fund grant award k.Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program grant award l.Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Hennepin County IGNITE funding award m.Resolution authorizing special assessment for repair of sewer service line at 3308 Idaho Avenue South - Ward 3 n.Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 2813 Georgia Avenue South - Ward 1 o.Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South - Ward 1 p.Resolution approving West End alternative urban areawide review update - Ward 4 6.Public hearings. a.2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 b.First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members 7.Regular business. a.Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 b.First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to cannabinoid products c.First reading of amendments to chapter 34 of the city code related to grass height d.First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to rental licensing 8.Communications and announcements – none. 9.Adjournment. Following city council meeting – Special study session – Council Chambers Discussion items 1. Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority 2. Commercial Land Trust discussion Agenda EDA, city council and special study session meetings of October 6, 2025 Written reports 3. Community Development Block Grant allocation changes 4. Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off Members of the public can attend St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and city council meetings in person. At regular city council meetings, members of the public may comment on any item on the agenda by attending the meeting in-person or by submitting written comments to info@stlouisparkmn.gov by noon the day of the meeting. Official minutes of meetings are available on the city website once approved. Watch St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority or regular city council meetings live at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or at www.parktv.org, or on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14/HD channel 798). Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on the city's YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the meeting’s end. City council study sessions are not broadcast. Generally, it is not council practice to receive public comment during study sessions. The council chambers are equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505. Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Sept. 2, 2025 1. Call to order. President Budd called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. a. Roll call. Commissioners present: Lynette Dumalag, Paul Baudhuin, Yolanda Farris, President Sue Budd, Commissioners absent: Tim Brausen, Nadia Mohamed, Margaret Rog Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), city attorney (Mr. Mattick), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), community development director, interim building and energy director (Ms. Barton), administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), associate planner (Ms. Champoux), finance director (Ms. Cruver), facilities superintendent (Mr. Eisold), public services superintendent/deputy public works director (Ms. Fisher), recreation superintendent (Ms. Friederich), police lieutenant (Mr. Hagen), fire chief (Mr. Hanlin), engineering director (Ms. Heiser), police chief (Mr. Kruelle), deputy police chief (Mr. Nadem), deputy city clerk (Ms. Scott-Lerdal), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), financial analyst (Ms. Stephens), park superintendent (Mr. Umphrey), planning manager (Mr. Walther), parks and recreation director (Mr. West), racial equity and inclusion director (Ms. Yang) 2. Approve agenda. It was moved by Commissioner Dumalag, seconded by Commissioner Farris, to approve the EDA agenda as presented. The motion passed 4-0 (Commissioners Brausen, Mohamed and Rog absent). 3. Minutes. a. EDA meeting minutes of Aug. 4, 2025 It was moved by Commissioner Farris, seconded by Commissioner Dumalag, to approve the EDA meeting minutes of Aug. 4, 2025, as presented. The motion passed 4-0 (Commissioner Brausen, Mohamed and Rog absent). 4. Consent item. a. Approve EDA disbursements Economic development authority meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: EDA meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 It was moved by Commissioner Dumalag, seconded by Commissioner Farris, to approve the consent item as listed and to waive reading of all resolutions. The motion passed 4-0 (Commissioners Brausen, Mohamed and Rog absent). 5. Public hearings – none. 6. Regular business – none. 7. Communications and announcements - none. 8. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 6:05 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, EDA secretary Sue Budd, EDA president Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Approve EDA disbursements Recommended action: Motion to approve Economic Development Authority disbursement claims for the period of Aug. 26 through Sept. 23, 2025. Policy consideration: Does the EDA approve the disbursements for the period ending Sept. 23, 2025? Summary: The finance department prepares this report monthly for the EDA to review and approve. The attached report shows both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of disbursements by the EDA is required and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: EDA disbursement summary Prepared by: Estela Mulugeta, accounting specialist Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 186.06CENTERPOINT ENERGY EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Heating Gas Utility 186.06 8,778.88KUTAK ROCK LLP General Fund BS GENERAL 78.00Wooddale Station TIF G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,638.00Development - EDA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 10,494.88 653.00LIFESAVER FIRE PROTECTION EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 653.00 1,000.00METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Development - EDA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,000.00 5,730.00ST. LOUIS PARK EMERGENCY PROGRAM Community Development G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,730.00 839.40WHIPPER SNAPPER LAWN SERVICE Development - EDA G&A Repairs and Maintenance 839.40 91.54XCEL ENERGY EDA - 4300 36 1/2 G&A Electric Utility 91.54 Report Totals 18,994.88 Economic Development Authority meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approve EDA disbursements Page 2 Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 4b Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Pre-Development grant for affordable commercial spaces - Ward 1 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Pre-development grant agreement. Policy consideration: Does the Economic Development Authority (EDA) wish to approve an amendment to the pre-development grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council (Met Council), extending the grant period by 12 months? Summary: In April 2023, the EDA authorized application to the Met Council Pre-development grant to support the affordable commercial land trust project. Pre-development grants fund projects that support regional Livable Communities and Imagine 2050 goals. $90,000 was awarded to the project to support pre-development costs. The St. Louis Park EDA has partnered with Partnership in Property Commercial Land Trust (PIPCLT) on an initiative to create long-term affordable commercial spaces. The EDA purchased a commercial building of approximately 8,000 square feet at 4300 36 ½ St. off Excelsior Boulevard with the intent of subdividing it into commercial condominiums. Once completed, the new spaces would be sold at affordable prices to emerging entrepreneurs under a condominium/land trust arrangement. The Met Council has agreed to extend the term of the cleanup grant for 12 months until Dec. 31, 2026. This extension provides additional time for predevelopment activities related to the creation of commercial condominiums, such as architectural design work, in partnership with Partnership in Property Commercial Land Trust (PIP CLT). Financial or budget considerations: Grant funds received aid in reducing predevelopment costs that occur prior to redevelopment and construction. These fund help address financial gaps in a project budget and offset the amount of public financial assistance needed to make the project viable. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative & grants analyst Reviewed by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator; Sean Walther, deputy community development director; Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Economic development authority meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Pre-Development grant for affordable commercial spaces - Ward 1 EDA Resolution No. 25 - __ Authorizing an amendment for the Metropolitan Council Pre-development grant Whereas, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (Authority) has an active grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council (Met Council) for a Pre-development grant; and Whereas, the grant funds will continue to be used to create long-term affordable commercial spaces at 4300 36 ½ Street in the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the Authority has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and Whereas, the Met Council has approved the Authority’s request to extend the grant agreement by 12 months, until December 31, 2026; and Now, therefore, be it resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute the amendment to the Met Council Pre-development grant on behalf of the Authority, Be it further resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute such agreements necessary to receive the grant and implement the project (the grant agreement) and to carry out, on behalf of the authority, the authority’s obligations thereunder when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied; and Be it further resolved that the authority to approve, execute and deliver future amendments to the grant agreement entered into by the authority is hereby delegated to the President and Executive Director, subject to the following conditions: (a) extend deadlines, amend the project budget and scope, or do not materially adversely affect the interests of the authority; and (b) such amendments or consents do not contravene or violate any policy of the authority. The execution of any instrument by President and Executive Director shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such instruments in accordance with the terms hereof. In the event of absence or disability of the President and Executive Director any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or authorization of the Board by any member of the Board or any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer or officers of the Authority as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority October 6, 2025: Karen Barton, executive director Sue Budd, president Attest: Melissa Kennedy, secretary Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 4c Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development grant for Wooddale Station redevelopment- Ward 2 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development (LCDA-TOD) grant agreement for the Wooddale Station Redevelopment project. Policy consideration: Does the Economic Development Authority (EDA) wish to approve an amendment to the LCDA-TOD grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council (Met Council), extending the grant period by 24 months? Summary: In April 2023, the EDA authorized application to the Met Council LCDA-TOD grant to support the Wooddale Station Redevelopment project. LCDA-TOD grants support projects that investigate and clean up contaminated land, ground water or buildings for redevelopment. The St. Louis Park EDA has received $747,600 of funding through the Met Council LCDA-TOD grant to support site clean up to prepare the site for the construction of mixed rate apartments, commercial space and access to the transit station. The Met Council has agreed to extend the term of the clean up grant for 24 months until Dec. 31, 2027. This extension provides additional time for redevelopment of the property, including seeking a new development partner. Financial or budget considerations: Grant funds received aid in reducing redevelopment costs, addressing any financial gaps, and offsetting the amount of public financial assistance potentially needed to make the project viable. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Resolution, amendment request Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative & grants analyst Reviewed by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator; Sean Walther, deputy community development director; Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Economic development authority meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing an amendment to the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development grant for Wooddale Station redevelopment- Ward 2 EDA Resolution No. 25 - __ Authorizing an amendment for the Metropolitan Council LCDA-TOD grant to the Wooddale Station Redevelopment Whereas, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (Authority) has an active grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council (Met Council) for an LCDA-TOD grant; and Whereas, the grant funds will continue to be used to support site clean up at the Wooddale Station redevelopment site in the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the Authority has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and Whereas, the Met Council has approved the Authority’s request to extend the grant agreement by 24 months, until December 31, 2027; and Now, therefore, be it resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute the amendment to the Met Council LCDA-TOD grant on behalf of the Authority; and Be it further resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute such agreements necessary to receive the grant and implement the project (the grant agreement) and to carry out, on behalf of the authority, the authority’s obligations thereunder when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied; and Be it further resolved that the authority to approve, execute and deliver future amendments to the grant agreement entered into by the authority is hereby delegated to the President and Executive Director, subject to the following conditions: (a) extend deadlines, amend the project budget and scope, or do not materially adversely affect the interests of the authority; and (b) such amendments or consents do not contravene or violate any policy of the authority. The execution of any instrument by President and Executive Director shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such instruments in accordance with the terms hereof. In the event of absence or disability of the President and Executive Director any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or authorization of the Board by any member of the Board or any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer or officers of the Authority as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority October 6, 2025: Karen Barton, executive director Sue Budd, president Attest: Melissa Kennedy, secretary Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 4d Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing an amendment for the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development - Union Park Flats Project - Ward 2 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing an amendment for the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development (LCDA-TOD) grant agreement for the Union Park Flats project. Policy consideration: Does the Economic Development Authority (EDA) wish to approve an amendment to the LCDA-TOD grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council (Met Council), modifying the grant deliverables as outlined below? Summary: In October 2020, the EDA was awarded a $1,900,000 grant to help fund stormwater management, renewable energy, public art, site acquisition and public infrastructure for the Union Park Flats project. In August 2023, the EDA approved the first amendment extending the grant period by 24 months until Dec. 31, 2025. Union Park Flats is the new construction of affordable housing in the Wooddale Light Rail Transit Station by Project for Pride in Living in collaboration with Union Congregational Church. The project included demolition of a wing of the existing building and parking lot and construction of a new three-story building with 60 units of affordable housing, including 16 units affordable to households at 30% Area Median Income (AMI), 27 units at 50% AMI, and 17 units at 60% AMI. This project opened to the public in December 2024. The Met Council has agreed to modify the deliverables of the grant by updating the affordable housing unit mix to reflect deeper affordability than the original project description; to reflect a larger investment in solar panels; and to support the completed outdoor amenity space for residents rather than public art, as the nonprofit developer (Project for Pride in Living) is no longer able to complete public art onsite. Public art was not a required element of the zoning approvals for the project. Financial or budget considerations: Grant funds received will aid in reducing redevelopment costs, addressing any financial gaps and offsetting the amount of public financial assistance potentially needed to make the project viable. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative & grants analyst Reviewed by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator; Sean Walther, deputy community development director; Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Economic development authority meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing an amendment for the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Demonstration Account Transit Oriented Development - Union Park Flats Project - Ward 2 EDA Resolution No. 25-__ Authorizing an amendment for the Metropolitan Council LCDA-TOD Union Park Flats Project Whereas, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (Authority) has an active grant agreement with the Metropolitan Council (Met Council) for a LCDA-TOD grant; and Whereas, the grant funds will continue to be used to create affordable housing at 3700 Alabama Ave S in the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the Authority has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration; and Whereas, the Met Council has approved the Authority’s request to modify the project deliverables; and Now, therefore, be it resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute the amendment to the Met Council LCDA-TOD grant on behalf of the Authority; and Be it further resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute such agreements necessary to receive the grant and implement the project (the grant agreement) and to carry out, on behalf of the authority, the authority’s obligations thereunder when all conditions precedent thereto have been satisfied; and Be it further resolved that the authority to approve, execute and deliver future amendments to the grant agreement entered into by the authority is hereby delegated to the President and Executive Director, subject to the following conditions: (a) extend deadlines, amend the project budget and scope, or do not materially adversely affect the interests of the authority; and (b) such amendments or consents do not contravene or violate any policy of the authority. The execution of any instrument by President and Executive Director shall be conclusive evidence of the approval of such instruments in accordance with the terms hereof. In the event of absence or disability of the President and Executive Director any of the documents authorized by this resolution to be executed may be executed without further act or authorization of the Board by any member of the Board or any duly designated acting official, or by such other officer or officers of the Authority as, in the opinion of the City Attorney, may act in their behalf. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority October 6, 2025: Karen Barton, executive director Sue Budd, president Attest: Melissa Kennedy, secretary Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Presentation: 3a Executive summary Title: Recognition of 2025 Evergreen award recipients Recommended action: Natural Resources manager, Mike Bahe, will present the 2025 Evergreen Award to the following recipients: • Traditional Garden Category o Nancy Wolfe, 4246 Ottawa Avenue South, Minikahda Vista neighborhood • Alternative Garden Category o Lee Conliffe & Katherine Dowd, 2845 Inglewood Avenue South, Fern Hill neighborhood Policy consideration: None. Summary: The Evergreen Award is presented each year in recognition of properties which are uniquely designed with well-maintained landscapes with an emphasis on parcels that are visible to the passerby. Businesses, apartments and houses are all eligible to receive the award. Of the 15 nominations received this year, two winners were selected by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission members and key staff. The winners will be presented with an award certificate, a dwarf Alberta spruce tree and “Evergreen Award Winner” sign posted in their boulevard for two weeks. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable, Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator Reviewed by: Mike Bahe, natural resources manager Jason T. West, parks and recreation director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Presentation: 3b Executive summary Title: Proclamation observing National Disability Employment Awareness Month Recommended action: Mayor to read the proclamation observing National Disability Employment Awareness Month. Policy consideration: None. Summary: 2025 marks 80 years of National Disability Employment Awareness Month (NDEAM) in the United States. Beginning as a weeklong national observance, this commemorates the history of disability employment and raises awareness of creating an accessible workplace inclusive of mental and physical disabilities – visible or not. The City of St. Louis Park invites our community to learn more about disability employment history and explore ways to incorporate accessibility in our everyday lives. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. Supporting documents: Resource page Proclamation Prepared by: Jocelyn I Hernandez Guitron, racial equity and inclusion Reviewed by: Pa Dao Yang, racial equity and inclusion director Rita Vorphal, human resource director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: Proclamation observing National Disability Employment Awareness Month Resource page To celebrate National Disability Employment Awareness Month, the City of St. Louis Park invites you to: • Learn about the history of employment rights for people with disabilities o National Disability Employment Awareness Month (NDEAM) | U.S. Department of Labor o History of Disability Rights Milestones and Laws o Myths About Employees with Disabilities | Minnesota Council On Disability o People With Disabilities Want To Work — But It’s Complicated • Find ways to increase accessibility in your everyday life o Everyday accessibility tips for the workplace | Campus Accessibility | University of Waterloo o How to Help Employees With Disabilities Thrive | The Way We Work, a TED series • Connect with disability rights organizations in Minnesota o Celebrate National Disability Employment Awareness Month (NDEAM) o Advocacy and general disability related information / Minnesota Department of Human Services City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: Proclamation observing National Disability Employment Awareness Month Proclamation “National Disability Employment Awareness Month” Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park supports the Minnesota Council on Disability vision of “a barrier-free Minnesota where every person with a disability has full access to all aspects of life”; and Whereas, the Minnesota State Demographic center notes that about 595,684 Minnesotans report having a disability, with ambulatory disabilities (difficulty walking, climbing stairs) being most common; and Whereas, disability has legal and medical definitions, with the American with Disabilities Act defining it legally as a person with a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activity – this includes those who have a record of disability and those may not see themselves as having a disability; and Whereas, being disabled has complex impacts on an individual. Often, disabled people and their family have to navigate stigma, legal challenges, benefit systems and advocating for their right to access and accommodations; and Whereas, the legacy of state and federal policies and beliefs about disabled workers is present as evidenced by double the low employment rates as compared to those without disabilities, and the continued fight for disability rights; and Whereas, individuals with disabilities are highly skilled and valuable contributors to our economy and communities; and Whereas, St. Louis Park encourages all residents to learn how to build an inclusive community with access and equity for all; and Now therefore, let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, hereby honor October 6, 2025 as National Disability Employment Awareness Month in our community. Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 6th day of October, 2025. _________________________________ Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Presentation: 3c Executive summary Title: Proclamation observing Indigenous Peoples Day Recommended action: The Mayor is asked to to read the proclamation observing Indigenous Peoples Day. Policy consideration: None. Summary: To celebrate Indigenous People’s Day, the City of St. Louis Park invites residents to learn about the history of Indigenous communities in our state and city, attend an event or exhibit that highlights Indigenous art, culture, history and connect with Indigenous organizations in Minnesota. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. Supporting documents: Resource page Proclamation Prepared by: Jocelyn I Hernandez Guitron, racial equity and inclusion specialist Reviewed by: Pa Dao Yang, racial equity and inclusion director Black, Indigenous and People of Color employee resource group Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 3c) Page 2 Title: Proclamation observing Indigenous Peoples Day To celebrate Indigenous People’s Day, the City of St. Louis Park invites you to: • Learn about the history of Indigenous communities o Tribal Nations in Minnesota / Indian Affairs o Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan on Indigenous Peoples Day | Minnesota Monthly o Resources - NATIFS • Consider attending an event or exhibit that highlights American Indian art, culture, and history o Experience the Vibrant Native American Arts & Culture Scene of Minneapolis | Meet Minneapolis o We Move and We Stay Exhibit at the Science Museum of Minnesota | Science Museum of Minnesota • Connect with Indigenous organizations in Minnesota o Metro Urban Indian Directors o Celebrating Native American Heritage Month in Minneapolis | Meet Minneapolis | Meet Minneapolis City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 3c) Page 3 Title: Proclamation observing Indigenous Peoples Day Proclamation “Indigenous People’s Day” Whereas, Minnesota is home to 11 federally recognized tribes, seven of which are Anishinaabe and four are Dakota, and a robust urban Native American community; and Whereas, the languages, foodways, traditions and ways of knowing of tribal nations across the state and country have demonstrated resilience, flourishing despite historical attempts to diminish them, and communities and educators are passionately working to revitalize and celebrate these vital Indigenous ways of life; and Whereas, this day is a call to recognize and celebrate the ongoing contributions of Indigenous peoples in our city, state and nation; honoring the ways they have built and sustained a more just and inclusive community for all since time immemorial; and Whereas, Indigenous nations in Minnesota continue to face the effects of colonization and continued discrimination against their way of life, language, traditions and history through the legacy of the Indian Removal Act, Indian boarding school policies, and other policies that infringed on Indigenous rights; and Whereas, while recognizing the profound and ongoing challenges faced by indigenous communities, we simultaneously honor the powerful-community led efforts underway for healing, recovery and self-determination that will sustain the culture for future generations; and Whereas, the community of St. Louis Park is called to deepen our understanding, engage in meaningful ways and implement policies and practices that recognize Indigenous experiences and honor Indigenous sovereignty, Now therefore, let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, hereby honor October 6, 2025 as Indigenous People’s Day in our community. Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 6th day of October, 2025. _________________________________ Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Presentation: 3d Executive summary Title: Recognition of donations Recommended action: Mayor announce and express appreciation for the following donation being accepted at the meeting and listed on the consent agenda. From Donation For Tammi Rooyakkers Coalition9 $25 $250 Donation for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center to celebrate grandson Paul’s fourth birthday Donation for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center Arlette Barnhiser Dorothy and James Hautman Gerald and Kristy Blick Heidi Ebert Jill and Todd Theiss Judith Bennett Merlin and Jean Helgemoe Pauline and John Carroll Sarah and Robert Gabler $1,831 $100 $35 $25 $25 $25 $100 $30 $100 Donations for park enhancements at Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring Zita Zogg Brian and Kelly Pinter Ken and Kathy Neyhard $200 Donation not to exceed $200 to the police department for police investigation, honoring Mike Adelson Community Charities of Minnesota $2,500 Donation of up to $2,500 for police expenses related to K9 officers Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Minutes: 4a Unofficial meeting minutes City council study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Aug. 11, 2025 The meeting convened at 6:04 p.m. Council members present: Paul Baudhuin, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Yolanda Farris, Margaret Rog, Mayor Nadia Mohamed Council members absent: Lynette Dumalag Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), community development director and interim building and energy director (Ms. Barton), administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), city assessor (Mr. Bultema), finance director (Ms. Cruver), facilities superintendent (Mr. Eisold), recreation superintendent (Mr. Friederich), public works director (Mr. Hall), fire chief (Mr. Hanlin), engineering director (Ms. Heiser), city clerk (Ms. Kennedy), deputy police chief (Mr. Nadem), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), financial analyst (Ms. Stephens), park superintendent (Mr. Umphrey), HR director (Ms. Vorpahl), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), parks and recreation director (Mr. West), racial equity and inclusion director (Ms. Yang) Discussion items 1. 2026 Operating budget Ms. Cruver presented the staff report. The following policy considerations were presented and discussed: 1. Does the city council support the recommended general fund budget, one-time spending ($294,752), and levy increase ($556,685) as presented, with the understanding that capital projects will require additional levy increases? 2. Does the city council support a flat Housing Redevelopment Authority levy in 2026 of $1.19 million, with the understanding that additional external revenues are going to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to support programs? 3. Does the city council support an Economic Development Authority levy of $375,000 in 2026, a planned increase of $187,000 from 2025, to cover non-personnel programming funded out of the development fund? 4. Does the city council support the recommended transfers between internal service funds to ensure each fund is meeting policy and best practice guidelines? 5. Does the city council support lowering the funding for public art for light rail stations from $175,000 to $75,000 to align with the current plans for the projects? City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 6. Does the city council wish to add $80,000 in the 2026 budget to add public art to the Dakota Park Pedestrian bridge? On June 16, 2025, the council received an update to non-property tax city revenues and expenses forecasted in 2026. This report included recommended operating spending and reduction proposals in the general fund (the city's largest fund that supports core city services) and is supported largely by the property tax levy as well as recommendations for the development fund, Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF), associated Economic Development Authority (EDA) and Housing Redevelopment Authority (HRA) levies, as well as the city’s internal service funds. Staff is seeking specific feedback on whether the council’s priorities have been accurately captured and reflected in the proposed budget, and whether the council is seeking additional investments in other city-adopted priorities. On Sept. 2, 2025, the city council will receive a report on forecasted capital expenses and revenues, as well as recommended new spending proposals for 2026. At that meeting, staff will present a more complete proposed 2026 budget and a comprehensive recommended levy increase for 2026. Ms. Cruver stated that on Sept. 15, 2025, the preliminary levy will be on the agenda for council approval. This is the maximum levy amount the county will use to estimate residents' property taxes. Ms. Cruver presented information regarding the three departments with the largest proposed budget increases for 2026. Ms. Cruver stated the parks and recreation department will offset proposed increases with an ongoing reduction of $76,800. This reduction comes from reducing underspent line items in their budget and ending a mulch service previously provided to residents at a loss. Regarding the mulch service, Council Member Rog asked if is the same location where residents currently have access to wood chips at no cost. Ms. Walsh stated yes, that is correct. Council Member Rog asked if residents would still be able to access free wood chips at the site. Ms. Walsh confirmed that free wood chip access will continue; the city will rent equipment to grind wood into chips. Council Member Budd asked about $265,000 in expected revenue for concessions services. Ms. Cruver stated that this would involve staff taking over concessions during the winter months. She stated that staff believe they will be able to offset expenses by raising enough money from staffing concessions in-house. Council Member Rog asked if the tree treatment program is now under the parks and recreation department and if this position is consistent with past practice. Ms. Cruver stated yes and noted that within the parks and recreation department, tree programs are under the natural resources division. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 Council Member Rog asked about concessions at the Recreation (Rec) Center and if credit cards would be the only accepted method of payment. Ms. Cruver stated concessions will accept cash or credit, which is the norm. Council Member Rog stated that she was surprised and pleased to see that the Rec Center’s skate program serves over 5,000 people in the community and commended staff. Council Member Budd asked if there had ever been a demographic analysis of the 5,000 people the skate program serves. Mr. West noted staff does not currently have specifics, but the demographic comprises children and adults from St. Louis Park and surrounding communities. Ms. Cruver transitioned the discussion to the police department’s proposed budget. The department will offset proposed increases by $25,500 in reductions to several service expenses in their budget which are regularly underspent. New and expanded spending in 2026 includes overtime increases, three new drones, two new eBikes for patrol, and expanding the number pepper ball launchers to equip all squad cars. She noted the largest increase in the police department budget is overtime, equaling $250,000. Council Member Farris asked if the high cost in overtime is due to staffing shortages. Ms. Cruver stated that staffing is one reason for high overtime costs. At this time, St. Louis Park is not working with a greatly reduced staff. When turnover or retirements occur, the process of hiring new officers, including background checks, training and onboarding requires significant time. Deputy Chief Nadem stated that in 2024, seven experienced officers left the St. Louis Park police department. Though 13 more staff were hired, the process of training and onboarding officers takes about one year. This requires other officers to work overtime to cover gaps. Council Member Budd noted that in 2024, attrition was approximately double its historic rate. She asked if increased attrition was attributed to a specific reason. Deputy Chief Nadem stated it was an anomaly. Council Member Budd asked why the police department had budgeted low in the past, with increases proposed this year. Ms. Cruver stated that when the budget was set in 2025, staff was halfway through the year. At that time, they did not yet know the overtime costs for 2024. Staff are catching up with appropriate data so they can make more informed spending decisions going forward. Council Member Baudhuin asked what PepperBall launchers are. Deputy Chief Nadem stated that PepperBall launchers propel a chemical irritant that incapacitates a violent subject so they can be apprehended safely. The PepperBall launchers are a less lethal tool that allow officers to slow down the situation, create space and de-escalate a violent subject. Council Member Baudhuin asked if the police currently have PepperBall launchers. Deputy Chief Nadem stated no, officers are currently equipped with 40 mm launcher that are designed to physically strike a subject with a projectile. Council Member Baudhuin asked if any data shows that there is de-escalation in an event when using PepperBall launchers. Deputy Chief Nadem stated the use of a launcher will slow down City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 the pace of a situation if the subject is armed. PepperBall launchers are an alternative to police utilizing a firearm against a violent and possibly armed subject, while also controlling the incident. De-escalation can then be conducted by crisis negotiation officers to help bring about a safer outcome. Council Member Baudhuin asked if the racial equity and inclusion (REI) staff is consulted on the kinds of decisions the council is making around police tactics. Deputy Chief Nadem stated that an REI analysis is conducted on proposals and implementation of PepperBall launchers was discussed with the Police Multicultural Advisory Committee (PMAC) as well. He noted that PMAC has expressed support for the implementation of PepperBall launchers. Council Member Budd asked if the proposed amount of money equips all police officers or the Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) team only, and if other organizations could provide this equipment for the city’s police force. Deputy Chief Nadem stated the PepperBall launcher will not be issued to every officer but would be issued to every squad car that does not currently have a 40 mm launcher. Each squad car will be provided with either a 40 mm launcher or a PepperBall launcher as a less lethal option. Deputy Chief Nadem added that if officers waited for another agency to provide equipment, the process of coordination, availability and acquisition takes a great deal of time, which they may not have under these circumstances. Council Member Rog asked about police drones and what they are utilized for. For example, she asked if they can be used to view a resident's backyard without a warrant, or if they can be used to view school property. Deputy Chief Nadem stated drone deployment, use and documentation is strictly regulated by state statute. Drone deployment can only be conducted with a warrant or under exigent circumstances related to a warrant exception. He pointed out that drones are not used to view a private person’s property without a warrant or an exception to a warrant. Council Member Budd asked about staff members in the military and on long-term leave. She asked if long-term leaves would have an impact on police department staffing. Deputy Chief Nadem stated a military leave could be six months to one year and would impact police staffing. Council Member Budd asked if leaves are being factored into the costs related to the police force. Deputy Chief stated military leaves relating to overseas deployment cannot be factored in because the requests are made randomly by the United States Army. Ms. Cruver stated that this is something staff is working on, adding that the city already covers military leave and parental leave. However, she noted there is no existing data on the impact related to military leaves of absence and staff will continue to assess this. Ms. Cruver transitioned the discussion to the administrative services department’s proposed budget. Administrative services is offsetting proposed increases by reducing spending by $34,000 through more cost-effective software for meeting minutes, reducing the contractual services budget, and charging processing fees for credit cards. Ms. Cruver noted that the largest proposals in administrative services are for citywide initiatives directed by council. She reviewed one-time costs of $75,000 instead of $175,000 as council City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 previously directed, to install public art in conjunction with light rail stops in St. Louis Park. This is due to subsequent conversations where murals were identified as the preferred art form at the stations. By design, murals are less expensive than many other types of public art. Additionally, in the 2026 budget there are funds for Vision 4.0 strategic planning, including a $50,000 one-time consulting fee. Ms. Cruver also noted a one-time increase of $40,000 for temporary staff to assist with elections in 2026, which is a function of being required to administer two elections in 2026 versus one election in 2025. Council Member Brausen asked if the city will still ask developers to fund public art around the light rail station areas. Ms. Cruver stated yes. Council Member Rog noted that the council did approve a larger cost amount for public art. She asked if there is an opportunity to direct those allocated funds to public art at light rail stations, which leads to city beautification as well as decreased crime. Ms. Cruver stated that staff are thinking about how to formalize public art as a policy for the city. By reducing the cost of art at light rail stations, funding is freed up for uses such as the Dakota Pedestrian Bridge. Council Member Rog noted the strategic plan Vision 4.0 process and stated she remembered robust staff-led sessions that occurred in the last visioning process. She asked what factors led to the city requiring a consultant this time and asked her fellow council members to weigh in. Ms. Keller stated that in this vision process, staff are also considering how to operationalize the priorities created through a citywide strategic plan. The consultant’s role is to help staff examine what all departments are doing to live out these priorities. Council Member Rog asked if the strategic plan would have measurable goals. Ms. Keller stated that is her expectation, adding she envisions goals along with timetables to help drive the work. Council Member Rog stated at times she has felt limited by decisions of past city councils, so components of the plan are a concern. She noted the strategic priorities have been helpful for her in this regard. Ms. Brodeen stated that the Vision 4.0 process is intended to develop the strategic priorities on which the strategic plan will be built. The strategic plan will provide additional measures, goals and timetables that will let the council, staff and the public know how we are achieving and living the strategic priorities established through the Vision 4.0 process. Council Member Brausen stated that this seems like a one-time goal and would assist the administration of the city. He stated he is supportive and noted the goal ensures that staff and the city are utilizing the outcomes of the Vision of 4.0 work to the best of their ability. Ms. Cruver transitioned the discussion from the major changes in the general fund to the major changes in other city funds. She asked the council to note that in the 2025 state legislative session, extension of the city’s special Tax Increment Financing (TIF) legislation was not passed. Due to this, changes will occur with the city’s Affordable Housing Trust Fund (AHTF) program. She stated that the city will still be able to pool TIF for affordable housing but will lose the City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 6 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 ability to deposit those funds into the AHTF, thereby significantly limiting the flexibility and impact of these resources. Ms. Cruver stated that staff recommends the city continue directing pooled TIF to the AHTF and maintain the current levy support for this work so that the city can maximize assets for affordable housing opportunities. Mayor Mohamed asked what change the city would experience because the TIF legislation was not passed. Ms. Cruver explained that the change is that the city’s special legislation allowing for the deposit of pooled TIF for affordable housing into the AHTF is expiring and was not renewed by legislature. She stated that future pooled TIF funds for affordable housing will be able to be used on brick-and-mortar projects. However, the process will be more complicated as compared to the flexibility of how funds were used in the past. Ms. Barton added that these funds can be used on development projects and do not have to be used on city-led projects. The funds are not allowed to be used for city housing programs, as was allowed in the past. They can only be used for the construction of new development projects or renovation of existing affordable housing. Ms. Cruver stated this change is not reflected in the budget yet, adding that it will take effect at the end of 2026. She noted that funding will still be available for the city’s affordable housing program uses in 2025 and 2026. Council Member Rog asked what criteria staff use for purchasing land. She noted a parcel of land in Ward 1, which she had mentioned to staff a few years ago and was recently purchased for $1,000,060.00. At the time she mentioned the parcel to staff, the city elected not to purchase it. Ms. Barton stated there are a number of factors involved in the decision to purchase land. Factors include whether the land is in a strategic location that could facilitate a larger development or prevent an undesirable redevelopment project from occurring. Additionally, staff considers whether parcels of land are available because the free market will not purchase them for some reason. It is preferred to have the free market purchase and develop land. The city’s zoning code and comp plan provide the development guidance for free market purchase and development. Council Member Rog asked if there are properties within the city that are still available to purchase. Ms. Barton stated that there are always properties available, but city staff evaluate each opportunity to determine if a public acquisition is the right step. Ms. Cruver noted the Climate Investment Fund. She stated that, assuming expenditure trends plateau at approximately the current level of $200,000 per year, staff anticipates depleting the fund by year-end 2026. The city council gave staff direction at the June 9, 2025 study session to identify an ongoing funding source that supports the yearly investment of $200,000 into climate action incentive programs. Ms. Cruver stated that staff is currently exploring two funding sources for this annual investment: utility franchise fees and the general levy. She stated there is an opportunity to City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 7 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 divert $200,000, which is approximately 4% of franchise fee revenues, to the climate investment fund. She also added that staff recommends increasing the levy by $50,000 a year over four years, utilizing fund balance to cover the difference until the fourth year. Ms. Cruver stated this would use approximately $100,000 of additional general fund balance and could be reviewed each year during the budget process as spending and revenue needs change. Ms. Cruver stated that council direction will be sought at the Sept. 2, 2025, city council study session on a final recommendation for supporting the Climate Investment Fund permanently. Council Member Rog noted there will be a loss of federal funding on these goals of climate action, so it will be necessary to invest more, not the same amount, to incentivize residents. Ms. Cruver stated that the staff is considering options but does not have a new recommendation at this time on a specific amount. She added that staff will consider interest rates and other factors, adding $200,000 is the recommendation at this time. Ms. Cruver noted that staff is also looking closely at internal service fund considerations and fund balances. She stated recommendations on cash balances for this fund include reducing the property and casualty insurance fund and moving this back to the general fund. She stated that staff recommends the employee benefit funds should increase the funds' cash balance by $100,000 by transferring unobligated general fund dollars to meet the goal, in addition to the increase in levy discussed earlier by the council. Ms. Cruver stated that staff-recommended transfers, if implemented, are related to these three internal funds and would equal a net $400,000 increase to the general funds unobligated fund balance. Ms. Cruver also pointed out credit card processing fees, which have now become a burden to the city at an annual cost of $350,000 to $450,000. These costs are largely in the utility and general funds. Rather than increase the levy or fees to account for this budget shortfall, staff proposes to pass a 3% credit card processing fee onto the individual cardholder. Credit card fees would be paid by customers who choose to pay by credit card. Council Member Budd asked if there would still be high costs if residents pay by checks instead of credit card. Ms. Cruver stated changes in the city’s banking services have become more automated, so the costs would have a minimal impact on city operations. Mayor Mohamed asked if there is a communications plan in place to notify residents of these changes. Ms. Cruver stated yes and noted staff will work with the communications department to publish information prior to implementation of charging credit card fees. Ms. Cruver shared that staff is interviewing vendors for Paid Family and Medical Leave (PFML) policies, and this will come to the council for approval later this year. Costs will be included in a staff report to the council when a final vendor has been chosen. In collaboration with the city’s benefits consultant, a Request for Proposal was issued to identify a private vendor to administer PFML as an alternative to the State of Minnesota’s program. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 8 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 Council Member Rog stated council consensus showed interest in a community center feasibility study earlier this year, and she asked if there could be consideration for allocating funds to this study in the 2026 budget. Mayor Mohamed stated she is hoping for this conversation to be held in 2026, after the Vision 4.0 process is completed. Council Member Brausen asked if this topic could be part of the capital improvements discussion. Ms. Keller stated that staff would do work to determine if a needs analysis, not a feasibility study, could be funded within the 2026 operating budget as proposed. If staff felt that additional dollars would be needed, staff would present their findings to the council at the Sept. 2, 2025 budget meeting. Mayor Mohamed reiterated her concerns, stating she wants to respect the results of the visioning process before doing a needs analysis. If the council pursues a community center, she wants to be able to point back to the visioning process that brings the idea of a community center forward. Council Member Rog stated, however, that a study does not mean there would be a commitment to build a community center. The study would only be for the council to gather more information before pursuing a community center. Council Member Rog asked what tools will be available for the public regarding tonight’s discussion. Ms. Cruver stated that the graphs presented tonight will be included in publications presented to the public by the finance department in the next few weeks. There will be information on spending by department and the information will be posted to the city website. Council Member Rog stated the public will be interested in the details of expenditures, such as pepper ball launchers being purchased by the police department. Ms. Cruver stated that those details will be included in the online budget book, along with the presentation and the minutes from this meeting. Ms. Cruver stated that the next steps will be presented at the Sept. 2, 2025 city council meeting. At that meeting, the council will receive a report on the 2026 capital improvement recommendations and will consider an all-inclusive levy recommendation for 2026. Council Member Baudhuin noted the city's priority pie chart and asked why spending on the racial equity and inclusion (REI) priority is so small by comparison. Ms. Cruver stated the pie chart represents all the new spending being proposed and not all spending by the city. She noted the biggest cost drivers in increases this year are setting up the brush site, city-operated concessions and police overtime costs. She shared that this is a year of maintenance while right-sizing the budget. Council Member Baudhuin stated that maybe the council needs to take a closer look at priorities and how city spending aligns with them. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 9 Title: Study session meeting minutes of August 11, 2025 Ms. Keller noted she looks at city priorities, and she expects to infuse REI as a lens of the work across all city priorities. It was the consensus of the city council to approve all the policy questions noted below: 1. Does the city council support the recommended general fund budget, one-time spending ($294,752), and levy increase ($556,685) as presented, understanding that capital projects will require additional levy increases? 2. Does the city council support a flat Housing Redevelopment Authority levy in 2026 of $1.19 million, with the understanding that additional external revenues are going to the Affordable Housing Trust Fund to support programs? 3. Does the city council support an Economic Development Authority levy of $375,000 in 2026, a planned increase of $187,000 from 2025, to cover non-personnel programming funded out of the development fund? 4. Does the city council support the recommended transfers between internal service funds to ensure each fund is meeting policy and best practice guidelines? 5. Does the city council support lowering the funding for public art for light rail stations from $175,000 to $75,000 to align with the current plans for the projects? 6. Does the city council wish to add $80,000 in the 2026 budget to add public art to the Dakota Park Pedestrian bridge? Council Member Farris thanked Ms. Cruver and staff for the presentation, stating it was very helpful and easy to understand, and she appreciated the staff’s work. The meeting adjourned at 7:53 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Minutes: 4b Unofficial minutes City council special study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Aug. 18, 2025 The meeting convened at 6:50 p.m. Council members present: Paul Baudhuin, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Yolanda Farris, Margaret Rog, Mayor Nadia Mohamed Council members absent: Lynette Dumalag Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), racial equity and inclusion specialist (Ms. Hernandez Guitron), city clerk (Ms. Kennedy), HR director (Ms. Vorpahl), racial equity and inclusion director (Ms. Yang); finance director (Ms. Cruver) Discussion item 1. Race, equity, and inclusion analysis - city council salaries Ms. Yang and Ms. Hernandez Guitron introduced themselves to the council. Ms. Kennedy stated at the council's request, the race equity and inclusion division will conduct a Racial Equity and Inclusion Impact Analysis (REIA) on the topic of city council salaries. This is a continuation of the conversation from the study session on July 7, 2025. Ms. Kennedy stated that on July 7, the council provided direction to adjust their annual salaries beginning in 2026 to $23,500 for the mayor and $18,000 for council members. She noted that the council requested an equity analysis on the topic. The council will participate in the analysis led by REI staff. Ms. Yang described historical and systemic barriers to diversity among elected officials in the United States. There is a long history of excluding individuals and communities from policymaking due to factors including race, ethnicity, gender, immigration status, disability status, age, income or educational level. She added that there is much work to be done in this area. Ms. Yang stated that the goal of today’s discussion will be to identify the potential racial equity and inclusion impacts of an annual salary increase for the city council. Ms. Yang asked all to be mindful that every voice is heard in the discussion. To support that process, each council member would take turns responding to following eight (8) analysis questions in rounds. 1) What issue are you trying to solve? 2) What disparities is this change hoping to address? • Racial • Economic • Health City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 18, 2025 • Ability • Gender • Language • Other: age diversity/equity, education 3) Which racialized and marginalized groups might be impacted or concerned with the issues related to this proposal? Mayor Mohamed stated that one issue the council is trying to solve is the feeling of being overworked and underpaid while serving on the council. When an elected official is performing council work for 20 hours per week or more, a person should be able to earn more than minimum wage. The disparity she most desires to address is economic. People who typically serve on a city council often come from a wealthy background or can otherwise afford to do the work, or they are retired. Being a public servant does not mean that council members should earn less than is fair. After economic disparity has been addressed, other disparities will naturally be addressed as well. It is important that the conversation focus on a wider impact than increasing pay specifically for black, indigenous and people of color (BIPOC) council members, and to take care around the messaging of this focus. Council Member Farris stated this issue is personal for her. She works two full-time jobs as well as serving on the city council. When she leaves meetings, she rushes to another job where she has a lot to do. A salary increase would make compensation more fair. A salary increase would help someone like her gain income and not have to work as much, allowing her to be able to focus more on the issues of the city. Council members do their best to serve to the best of their ability, and a salary increase would be no more than fair. She has heard some comments that council members should serve regardless of compensation, but that is not realistic because most people cannot afford to do that. Council Member Budd stated she hopes to change the council salaries to be comparable with the requirements of the office, including the many opportunities to be present in the community. Serving as a council member is a challenging part-time position and life has many demands. It is important to her that people be able to comfortably afford to serve on the council beyond a certain economic profile. All racialized and marginalized groups are affected by this issue, not just one. Council Member Brausen stated that the city council wants to take a step toward fair compensation for the work involved because serving on the council is demanding. There is a great deal of information to learn and study in addition to the time it takes to attend meetings and community activities. He shared that his work on city council issues involves 20 to 25 hours per week. Other council members - and certainly the mayor - work more time, above and beyond that, and the salary averages out to $11 per hour. He shared that he has another job and social security, so he can afford to do the work that being on the city council requires, but not everyone can afford to do the same. Council Member Brausen stated the economic disparity is very real, including racial impacts, and it needs to be addressed. He stated that although Mayor Mohamed is an exception, the average 20–30-year-old is so busy with family, home and economic obligations that they do not necessarily have time to serve their community. A salary increase would have a positive impact City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 18, 2025 for many. However, an increase in pay may not change the dynamic substantially. A salary increase does not remove barriers for those whose work is scheduled in the evenings. An increase also does not address those who need a better source of income for childcare, or those who struggle to pay their bills. Council Member Rog agreed with and appreciated the comments given so far. To her, the largest issue is to increase the pool of council member candidates as well as the perceived value of the role. She agreed with the comments shared about feeling overworked and underpaid. To her, the proposal feels like a moderate increase that elevates the position and the professionalism of being on the council. Council Member Rog noted that the LGBTQ+ community was not listed but is also a marginalized community that should be considered. She agreed that all council members would be positively impacted by higher city council salaries. Council Member Rog reinforced the mayor’s concerns related to care in messaging that the conversation is about more than racial equity. Council Member Baudhuin stated the primary issue is the need for more equitable pay when looking at the demands of the work. The city council consists of public servants who deserve a fair wage. The discussion is also about having a desire for more broad representation on the city council. He observed that the way the work is currently structured and paid favors individuals with full-time, salaried positions with a great deal of schedule flexibility. In his experience, the work of the city council is not always structured. There does seem to be merit in increasing the wage based on the work. Council Member Baudhuin stated his primary concern is about how to make serving on the city council more accessible for more people with different kinds of jobs and different kinds of lifestyles. 4) What positive impacts could result from this proposal? Who will benefit? 5) What negative impacts, intentional and unintentional, could result from this? Who will be disadvantaged? 6) How should we measure progress? What data will indicate success? 7) What assumptions are we making? Mayor Mohamed stated that the proposed increase will alleviate the combined work of the council and another job, reducing the burden serving on the council. Fair pay will also have a positive impact, and the council will be taking action to pursue fair pay and bring about change. On the other hand, council members running for re-election will be at a disadvantage. If the intention behind the salary increase is not communicated correctly, the communities of black, indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC community) will also be at a disadvantage. Mayor Mohamed stated the success of the proposal will be measured by how many community members have this conversation in future years. Overall, decreasing the burden of serving on the city council is a measure of progress. She noted that the council may be assuming that residents will be upset by a salary increase; it is also possible that residents may be neutral or even supportive. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 18, 2025 Council Member Farris stated that positive benefits to public servants include income that can be used towards the cost of living and the cost of food. Because of this, she pointed out that residents may understand salary increases. More people filing to run for election or appointment to the city council is measurable. Council Member Farris stated she is not making any assumptions and believes this discussion has been truthful. Council Member Budd stated that bringing city council salaries into the $17 - $23 per hour range will be more viable, while unintended messaging could have a negative impact. One assumption is that higher pay will bring in more candidates, and that is not guaranteed. The city council and staff can observe impact on the diversity and number of people in the candidate pool. If there is no impact, then a salary increase may have missed the mark. Council Member Brausen stated positive impacts are that the council and the community can feel better knowing that they are paying a reasonable wage for the work being done. He has found that the residents of St. Louis Park support good governance and feel they receive it, which he has also heard from the public comment during his time on the council. In his opinion, a larger pool of new candidates would be positive. A potential negative Council Member Brausen shared is that raising council member salaries could be perceived as self-serving for the council making the action. He noted that the council alone has the authority to take this action and council members must take responsibility as well. He added the BIPOC community may be negatively perceived if the proposal is adopted, and the council is concerned about this potential outcome. St. Louis Park currently has a diverse city council, which is reflective of the community. The average taxpayer will not be negatively impacted, and the proposed salary increase is a small number within the city’s overall budget. Council Member Brausen stated progress could be measured when other communities raise their council member salaries as well, also noting the importance of broad candidate pools. He noted the discussion has assumed that pay is a primary motivator to serve; he does not think that is true nor will pay have a direct result on the candidate pool. Another assumption is that the community will react negatively to the council raising their own pay, though he believes that is likely to occur. Council Member Rog agreed that an increase in the candidate pool is a measure of positive impact. Raising St. Louis Park’s city council member salary to the same level as comparable cities conveys a message. Through elevated professionalism, pride and community respect for the role of council member, the community validates and acknowledges the council’s work. Council Member Rog added that how council members and residents feel about council member positions and being paid comparable to other communities is another measurement. Diversity, economic, gender, and other marginalized communities will be looked at and measured to see if there are barriers to childcare or attending meetings. Council Member Rog stated that it would be a disadvantage to focus the intention of raising salaries entirely on people of color. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 18, 2025 Council Member Baudhuin stated retention of council members would be another positive outcome, and more pay could possibly assist in retention. He noted that the council members and their families will benefit as well. Progress can be measured in an increase of candidates regardless of identities and should be tracked over time. If there is a significant increase in the diverse identities held by council members, that will indicate success. Council Member Baudhuin stated that making money is not the primary driver for a person running for office, but some factors can be barriers. If those can be removed or made less of a barrier, that change would be positive. Increasing the candidate pool is essential and democracy involves choice. Residents need choices. He added that most governance processes are systems that were built by white men long ago, and he would like to take a robust look at the city’s systems. 8) Are there better ways to reduce racial disparities? What could be added or changed to advance racial equity and inclusion? Council Member Baudhuin stated he does not know and does not feel the council is equipped to adequately answer this question. He would like staff to conduct robust research on council member pay in general, beyond comparison with other cities. He also discussed research on how to increase candidate pools. Council Member Brausen stated that making the position of council member a full-time job and paying $125-$150,000 per year would be a way to reduce racial disparities. However, he believes the community would not support that change when there has been a very successful part-time council for many years. Council Member Brausen noted that the council is attempting to address the goal of salary in this discussion. Council Member Budd stated that boards and commissions would be an additional way to reduce racial disparities. In the past, boards and commissions experience has been a channel for engaged community members to consider running for the city council. Attention to recruitment and messaging for boards and commissions participation is another avenue to address reducing racial disparities. Council Member Farris stated that the focus should be on St. Louis Park as a whole and not just certain communities within the city. She shared that until she began working on the city council, she did not know much about the city or the city government. She wants to make this knowledge accessible to everyone. Sometimes, city government says that we want to include everyone, but what is shown is different. In her opinion and observations, the council is not fully addressing its mission. Council Member Rog stated she appreciates Council Member Farris’ comments. The systems that are in place make it more difficult for the council to bring about change. She gave an example of creating gathering places, such as a community center. Reducing barriers involves making sure that lived experiences, especially in marginalized communities, have a pathway to make a difference. Once people are elected to the city council, they have a voice or pathway. Council Member Rog added that the initial goal was to raise city council salaries. She City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 18, 2025 appreciated the racial equity discussion but did not understand that this was the only reason for the discussion about raising council member salaries. Mayor Mohamed stated there are always better ways to remove barriers, but there are also unintended consequences. She noted the city charter and state statute and how authority comes with restrictions. The council is addressing its initial goal of adjusting compensation, but ultimately, she is not sure how this will be perceived by residents. Mayor Mohamed compared St. Louis Park’s part-time council positions in comparison with Minneapolis, where council positions are considered full-time and their pay reflects that expectation. As part of her example, she noted that since St. Louis Park is predominantly white, residents will continue to have the same faces on council. In comparison, Minneapolis will always have more diversity in representation because the community is more diverse. She also noted that she was a bit confused by Council Member Baudhuin’s comments asking staff for more research, as the council is being asked to answer questions based on their experiences and because the decision related to their pay falls under their authority. She noted staff provided a lot of information based on the council’s questions and desire to discuss the topic. Council Member Baudhuin clarified his comments. The process has been frustrating for him because he has not seen any specific data from staff, and he feels ill-equipped to decide on this issue without that data. Ms. Kennedy stated staff conducted research and presented a lot of data for council to review and consider as a part of the discussion on July 7 to address the specific topic that was proposed by council related to increasing their compensation. She noted that staff also mentioned during that discussion that there is limited data that directly correlates or connects elected official pay to issues of equity, representation or number of candidates. She reiterated that staff did find studies that indicate there are numerous factors that impact access to or a person’s decision to serve in elected office, such as gender, education and socio-economic status. She explained at the meeting on July 7, 2025, staff heard direction from council that an equity analysis on the topic of council pay was desired. She noted that through the equity analysis staff are trying to understand from the council, based on their experiences, whether other barriers exist to serving on council so future strategies can be explored to address barriers that may exist beyond pay. Staff always try to provide information council has requested to make sure they have the information they need to make decisions. Some of the questions and topics being raised were perhaps not heard or fully understood during the previous discussion. Ms. Yang added that for the analysis discussion tonight, REI staff also researched the topic based on what was discussed on July 7 and did not find pay as the sole reason or determining factor for persons running for an elected office. Council Member Rog stated there was an article in the Sun Sailor newspaper related to council salaries recently and that she creates a newsletter for her constituents. Except for those who she asked, she received no feedback about this topic. From those who responded, all were fully supportive. While this was not a formal study, she has heard no community outcry related to salaries. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 18, 2025 Council Member Brausen observed that in 2008, there was a recession. The city council capped their salaries until 2014, when they authorized a cost-of-living increase of 3%. He stated the community understands that the council should get fair pay for hard work and residents are usually surprised when they hear that the council's salary is lower than expected. To Mayor Mohamed’s earlier comment, Council Member Budd stated that if this were a full- time job and the salary were increased, that would have an inverse effect. She stated that keeping the council member position as part-time and making the wage more equitable would take the city in the right direction. Ms. Yang stated that staff will review their notes and perform a summary analysis. The council will receive takeaways from the conversation. The meeting adjourned at 8:14 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Minutes: 4c Unofficial minutes City council meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Sept. 2, 2025 1. Call to order. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. a. Roll call. b. Pledge of allegiance. Council members present: Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Lynette Dumalag, Yolanda Farris, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Baudhuin Council members absent: Margaret Rog, Nadia Mohamed Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), city attorney (Mr. Mattick), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), community development director, interim building and energy director (Ms. Barton), administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), associate planner (Ms. Champoux), finance director (Ms. Cruver), facilities superintendent (Mr. Eisold), public services superintendent/deputy public works director (Ms. Fisher), recreation superintendent (Ms. Friederich), police lieutenant (Mr. Hagen), fire chief (Mr. Hanlin), engineering director (Ms. Heiser), police chief (Mr. Kruelle), deputy police chief (Mr. Nadem), deputy city clerk (Ms. Scott- Lerdal), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), financial analyst (Ms. Stephens), park superintendent (Mr. Umphrey), planning manager (Mr. Walther), parks and recreation director (Mr. West), racial equity and inclusion director (Ms. Yang) Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin stated that in South Minneapolis on Wednesday, Aug. 27, 2025, 23 people were either injured or lost their lives at the mass shooting at Annunciation Catholic Church. Eighteen of those who were injured were children as young as six, and both of those who tragically lost their lives were children. He stated that he has a fundamental belief in “naming,” and during the moment of silence today, he asked those in attendance to reflect on Fletcher Merkel (8 years old) and Harper Moyski (10 years old). 2. Approve agenda. It was moved by Council Member Dumalag, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve the agenda as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Mohamed and Council Member Rog absent). 3. Presentations. a. Proclamation observing Welcoming Week in St. Louis Park – Sept. 12-21, 2025. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: City council meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 Council Member Dumalag read the proclamation. She shared that the proclamation welcomes immigrants and noted it is great that St. Louis Park is participating in the nation-wide organization. Council Member Brausen stated he supports the proclamation and stated we all need to be more welcoming and less exclusive. He stated that all are welcome in St. Louis Park. Council Member Budd stated the spirit of the proclamation is needed now more than ever and being a welcoming community is high on our priorities as a city. b. Recognition of Donations. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin thanked three residents for their donations made to St. Louis Park’s Parks and Recreation Department: • Erin Lufholm - $2,800 – for a memorial bench to be installed in Bass Lake Preserve honoring Mike Lufholm • Jeffrey Rubins - $2,800 – for a memorial bench to be installed in Fern Hill Park honoring Amy Quinn Rubins • Gretchen C.Y. Shattuck - $3,100 – for a memorial bench and tree to be installed in Oak Hill Park honoring Nick L. Young 4. Minutes. a. Minutes of Aug. 18, 2025, city council meeting It was moved by Council Member Farris, seconded by Council Member Budd, to approve the Aug. 18, 2025, city council meeting minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Mohamed and Council Member Rog absent). 5. Consent items. a. Approve city disbursements b. Resolution No. 25-103 accepting donations to the Parks and Recreation Department c. Approve boards and commissions appointments d. Resolution No. 25-104 rescinding permit parking at 4815 W 42 1/2 Street - Ward 2 e. Resolution No. 25-105 rescinding permit parking at 4105 Utica Avenue - Ward 2 f. Resolution No. 25-106 approving Minnesota Department of Transportation drainage easement for TH169 - Ward 4 g. Approve temporary seasonal premises amendment for The Yard House #8354 Council Member Dumalag asked to comment on consent item 5c. She thanked the staff and those who accepted positions on boards and commissions. She noted the recent robust review process of the city’s boards and commissions which encouraged more engagement to serve. She is also excited about the youth commissioners and noted that a youth commissioner will join the planning commission. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Title: City council meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 Council Member Brausen commented on item 5f. He noted the easement is located in Ward 4 and Minnesota Department of Transportation will spend $3 million to reconfigure the bridge, with planning beginning this winter. Construction will begin next summer, and this, along with the Cedar Lake Road project in Ward 4, will be completed soon. He thanked all those involved, as well as Ward 4 residents for their patience. Council Member Brausen also commented on item 5g related to Yard House’s temporary seasonal premises to expand the restaurant’s outdoor seating area. Regarding item 5c, Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin also thanked the youth who are joining the city’s boards and commissions. He noted youth commissioners are over half of those newly appointed to their roles. The city is incredibly blessed with a strong group of youth who are engaged and want to lead. He also thanked Mr. Coleman for working on the process. It was moved by Council Member Dumalag, seconded by Council Member Farris, to approve the consent items as listed; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Mohamed and Council Member Rog absent). 6. Public hearing. a. Public hearing for first reading of ordinance adopting fees for 2026. Ms. Cruver presented the staff report. Ms. Cruver noted that each year, departments review city fees as part of the budget process. Fees are reviewed based on comparison to other cities in the metro area, changes in regulations, and to make sure city business costs are covered for providing corresponding services. When possible, staff try to stay in-line with inflation, which is currently around 3% for 2025. Most of the city’s fee increases are at or below inflation. The city council is asked to approve Appendix A items because those fees are set within the city code. Other city fees are set administratively. Ms. Cruver stated the second reading and adoption of the ordinance is scheduled for Sept. 15, 2025, and if approved, the fee changes will be effective Jan. 1, 2026. Ms. Cruver noted total budgeted capital spending in utility funds for 2026 through 2030. She pointed out that spending includes projects recommended and designated as a result of a water main risk analysis conducted over the last year. These projects will be financed through utility fees and borrowing. Ms. Cruver stated that the city’s fees have been relatively similar over the last three years, and the recommendations for 2026 are for a 4.5% increase. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin opened the public hearing. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4c) Page 4 Title: City council meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 Geoff Markham, 4100 Raleigh Ave., stated he has lived in Ward 2 since 2014. He owns and manages five apartment buildings in St. Louis Park, consisting of 46 units. Mr. Markum stated his family loves the city and the parks, and everything about St. Louis Park. He is addressing the fee and levy increase and believes the city, while not perfect, is successful because of the services and infrastructure it provides to the community. Mr. Markham encouraged staff and the council to use creativity to ease the financial burden on residents. He shared that his home has had an average property tax increase of 6.3% since 2001 and added he knows the proposed levy is close to 8%. He added that one of his apartment buildings has had a 5% annual increase, which equals $17 per month rent increase just to cover expenses, noting he has tried to keep annual expenses at 2%. He stated that property tax increases and fees not only affect homeowners and renters, but also diverse businesses in the city, including small businesses. He added that these fees should be thought of as increases in terms of employee hours and wages. Mr. Markham stated he reviewed the staff report and said the city needs to be well-funded to support the infrastructure, however, the burden of financial responsibility should not lie solely on residents. He encouraged the council to do its part in looking to reduce expenses. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin closed the public hearing. Council Member Brausen stated that each year, it is difficult to make sure annual fees are adequate to provide the necessary services in the city. He stated the fee schedule fairly reflects the cost of city services and provides the funding necessary to support the city’s infrastructure. He is supportive of the fees. Council Member Dumalag added her thanks to the staff on their presentation, and thanked Mr. Markham for his comments as well. She added that some of the eliminations make sense, such as the fees relating to licensing THC and cannabis. She noted that annual fees are not an opportunity for the city to make money; fees are set to recover the costs of delivering public services. She recalled past council discussions on the topic of solid waste fees. At that time, a request for proposals was presented and the effort was made to bundle services to make operations the most cost-effective. Council Member Dumalag asked staff to include tax levy impacts to renters and to small businesses when presenting to the council for further discussions on the levy. She stated that she will support the proposed fees. Council Member Budd added that she is also supportive of the fees and appreciated Mr. Markham’s comments, especially since he reflects the voices of many in the city. The scrutiny on fees is merited. She confirmed that the city council shares the goal of keeping property taxes as reasonable as possible, and one way to do that is through the fees. Some fee increases are due to state statute, and some are due to construction material and labor increases. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4c) Page 5 Title: City council meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 Council Member Farris added that St. Louis Park is a marvelous place to live, and the city council must keep doing what is necessary to make it so. She stated she will support the proposed fees. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin presented Council Member Rog’s comments: Council Member Rog thanked everyone for attending tonight’s meeting. She noted the use of picnic tables and community building events and neighborhood parks. Council Member Rog observed that there is no fee increase on picnic tables, instead, the fee is removed because the service of providing picnic tables to neighborhood groups is being removed. Council Member Rog stated the rationale provided for eliminating the service is that neighborhood organizations may not meet the criteria for receiving a reduced or waived fee. She added that the service should be eliminated, as no group may legally qualify. Since the city attorney's role is to advise the council and the council has not had the opportunity to discuss the city attorney's advice and make a determination, she feels the decision to eliminate such a valued resource in neighborhoods is premature. She intends to request time on the council’s calendar to discuss the issue further. There is an opportunity for a broader discussion around the legalities and practicalities of the service of providing picnic tables to neighborhood groups. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin stated he is in favor of the proposed fees but it is a difficult decision. He expressed agreement with Council Member Rog’s comments for a broader discussion around the topic of providing picnic tables to neighborhood groups as a service. Council Member Budd asked if there is a way to remove a single item from the proposed fees. Mr. Mattick stated that what is before the council is staff’s recommendations. The council can review and nuance or remove line items before the second reading and vote. In response to Council Member Rog’s comments, Mr. Mattick clarified that he is not of the opinion that fees cannot be waived for picnic tables for neighborhood groups. He noted that one of the tenants of government is for everyone to be treated the same. If there is a decision to waive fees for one group, it should be waived for others and there also needs to be rationale behind the decision. Mr. Mattick referred to public purpose and three basic ideas from Minnesota state statute. First, as the council distinguishes one group from another, the council cannot charge one group and not another. Secondly, the council needs to distinguish its reasons for designating and charging one group but not another. There needs to be a discussion on the distinction between different groups of individuals while having a rational basis that the groups are serving a legitimate government interest. The third idea Mr. Mattick referenced is that the distinction between groups cannot be based on suspect criteria. There should be objective, specific criteria so that staff can follow through fairly and consistently. He encouraged the council to think beyond a single request and understand the broader circumstances as to why and how the proposal satisfies a legitimate government interest. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4c) Page 6 Title: City council meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 Council Member Budd stated her ward has many neighborhood groups, and she is a strong proponent of them. Neighborhood groups and boards and commissions are significantly different from groups such as faith-based groups, and she would like to discuss the topic further with the council. She added that neighborhood groups meet the criteria of the city’s strategic priorities. Ms. Keller stated that as city staff worked to apply the analysis the city attorney presented, they created a list of community organizations that have a similar impact on the community. There had been a resident and a non-resident rate, which was restricted in years past due to capacity to fulfill requests. From an operational standpoint, staff would not have the capacity to accommodate the number of eligible requests. If council were interested in creating the rationale, she asked them to consider making the criteria as limited as possible. This comes from an operational standpoint because staff and the park and recreation staff have real concerns about the capacity to meet requests. Ms. Keller gave the example of neighborhood groups seeking equipment use for National Night Out, when many neighborhood organizations could be asking for a waiver of fees. Staff simply could not accommodate the probable number of requests, much less for other community groups. It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Dumalag, to approve the first reading of the ordinance adopting fees for 2026 and set the second reading for Sept. 15, 2025. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Mohamed and Council Member Rog absent). 7. Regular business. a. Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits – Ward 3. Ms. Champoux presented the staff report. Council Member Budd stated she would like to table these action items due to the absence of two council members this evening. Council Member Brausen shared he also has concerns about the project. He stated he is opposed to allowing drive-throughs in the city and noted this project involves a comprehensive plan amendment. To him, it feels like the city is trying to squeeze in every possible project at Knollwood Mall, and this type of facility feels contrary to the city’s anti-idling efforts. He realizes that drive-through restaurants are convenient and many people like them, but he feels the negatives of polluting the environment from emissions outweigh the convenience. He also noted one member of the planning commission had reservations about safety at the site, and he shares those concerns. He agreed that the full council should be in attendance when discussing and deciding on this item. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4c) Page 7 Title: City council meeting minutes of September 2, 2025 It was moved by Council Member Budd, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to table consideration of this item to Oct. 6, 2025. The motion passed 5-0 (Mayor Mohamed and Council Member Rog absent). 8. Communications and announcements. Ms. Keller noted on Friday, Sept. 5, 2025, “Movies in the Park” takes place at Aquila Park. She added that the city’s Art Fair is on Saturday, beginning at 10 a.m. at the Recreation Outdoor Center (ROC) and noted the event is held in partnership with Friends of the Arts. Ms. Keller pointed out that a clean-up day is scheduled on Sept. 13 and 19, 2025, with a paper shredding event. Sept. 18, 2025, is the Climate Action Academy education session at Lenox Center. Council Member Farris thanked the St. Louis Park Police Department for the Basketball in the Park program, which ended on Aug. 28, 2025. She stated the police officers did an amazing job with a party on the last day of the program. Everyone had a good time, including children receiving haircuts and school supplies in preparation for the upcoming school year. Council Member Farris shared that she has observed the program’s positive impact on relationships between the police department and residents. She thanked the department for bringing the community together with the program. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin added that students in St. Louis Park returned to school today, and students attending Benilde-St. Margaret’s Preparatory School returned last week. He asked all to be careful and watch out for school buses and children. He also asked parents to be patient and loving toward teachers who may have additional anxiety this year. 9. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 7:21 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Minutes: 4d Unofficial minutes City council study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Sept. 8, 2025 The meeting convened at 6:00 p.m. Council members present: Lynette Dumalag, Sue Budd, Tim Brausen (arrived 6:13 p.m.), Yolanda Farris, Mayor Pro Tem Paul Baudhuin Councilmembers absent: Mayor Nadia Mohamed, Margaret Rog Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), city assessor (Mr. Bultema), finance director (Ms. Cruver), racial equity and inclusion specialist (Ms. Hernandez Guitron), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), racial equity and inclusion director (Ms. Yang), community engagement coordinator (Mr. Coleman) Guests: Katie Lawler Turnbull, Human Rights Commission Chair; Andrea Alvarez, Human Rights Commission Vice Chair Discussion items 1. Boards and Commissions check-in with the city council: Human Rights Commission Mr. Coleman, Human Rights Commission (HRC) staff liaison, introduced the Chair Katie Lawler Turnbull and Vice Chair Andrea Alvarez. They presented the report related to the commission's work plan and goals for the coming year. The Human Rights Commission is one of the five advisory boards and commissions whose purpose is to advise the city council in its efforts to ensure protection of all citizens, their human rights, and full and equal opportunity for participation in the affairs of the community. The commission assists individuals and groups in cultivating a community that embraces principles of equity and respect for all its citizens. Tonight’s discussion will cover an overview of the commission's approved work plan, including any completed tasks, ongoing projects and strategies for addressing unaddressed work plan items. Additionally, the discussion will include opportunities for council feedback, potential modifications or additions to the work plan, and any other relevant topics concerning the commission's activities. The first item on the HRC’s work plan was to offer feedback and suggestions on the Neighborhood revitalization grant program. The HRC also offered feedback on the policy regarding cashless businesses and unbanked individuals. Chair Lawler Turnbull added that the HRC worked on the St. Louis Park Summer Reading Festival. Children First is driving this work and 2025 was the third year for the HRC to be involved. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Study session meeting minutes of September 8, 2025 This was the HRC’s second year hosting the Banned Book Brunch, which took place on Aug. 16, 2025. Chair Lawler Turnbull thanked Council Members Baudhuin and Rog for reading at the event. She noted there was a smaller turnout this year and shared there seemed to have been a marketing issue on the end of the organizer. The HRC partnered with elections and did a tabling event at the Ice Cream Social. There, they participated in educating people on rank-choice voting as well as promoting Vision 4.0. The HRC will continue to table at the event in the future. The 2024 Human Rights Award was given to Dana Strahnson, who is the children’s librarian for St. Louis Park. Chair Lawler Turnbull described how Ms. Strahnson does engagement as well as diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) work, and was thrilled to win the award. Chair Lawler Turnbull added that the HRC will soon be conducting their call for 2025 award submissions. Commission members have been tabling at events to promote the Vision 4.0 process and materials have been distributed at all events to engage neighbors. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated one of the HRC’s previous goals was to have increased LGBQT+ allyship. This year, they were able to collaborate with Golden Valley Pride and table with the race, equity and inclusion division at the Golden Valley Pride Festival, which is the biggest pride festival outside of downtown Minneapolis. There was a high level of engagement and they plan to continue participating with the event going forward. After the 2024 election and with the current administration, Chair Lawler Turnbull stated the HRC convened to discuss how to support members of the community who felt isolated or alienated. The HRC has developed physical handouts bringing attention to available resources for people who need additional assistance. She presented the council with a draft of a brochure as an example of a handout directing residents to the city’s resource page. In collaboration with St. Louis Park’s Friends of the Arts, the HRC hosted an art walk at Wolfe Park. She stated the theme was “my dream for my community,” and many enjoyed the artwork. Council Member Budd asked for more information on resources available to residents. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated resources from the drafted brochure had been added to the city website. Mr. Coleman added that the HRC will also hand out flyers with a QR code to direct people to sites and resources. Council Member Budd asked if the handouts would require approval by the city council. Mr. Coleman stated the HRC brochure was developed in collaboration with the city’s communications department. Chair Lawler Turnbull added that the HRC hopes to collaborate with the Environment and Sustainability Commission (ESC) and will have a presence at all the 2025 Welcoming Week events. Council Member Farris thanked the HRC for their amazing work. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4d) Page 3 Title: Study session meeting minutes of September 8, 2025 Council Member Budd commented that the commission’s 2026 work plan could include the prevailing wage issue and labor rights within the city. She stated Immigration and Customs Enforcement actions are being ramped up federally and there is a need for more immigration resources to be included in the resource brochure. Council Member Budd asked if the HRC has any connection with the school district. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated the school board member who was on HRC was a great liaison but noted the person has now stepped down. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated the HRC is happy to work with someone else from the school district. Mr. Coleman added that the vacant seat was not filled by another school board member. Council Member Budd asked if the HRC has any vacant positions. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated that the commission has no vacancies. Council Member Budd added that with the two youth members on the HRC now, they could offer some connection to the school district. Chair Lawler Turnbull agreed. Council Member Dumalag noted the Creekside neighborhood within her ward has a racial equity association and has crafted a policy that neighborhood vendors should be women- or BIPOC-owned (black, indigenous, people of color). She asked if there are other neighborhood groups that are interested in creating a similar policy. Mr. Coleman stated that Creekside is the only neighborhood with such a group. He noted the neighborhood group is still working on its purpose, and there has been no collaboration with the HRC yet. Council Member Brausen noted the first commission he served on in the city was HRC, and he is proud of having done so. He asked if the HRC interacts with the police department. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated the HRC does and responded to bias crimes in the past. She noted there have been no recent incidents. Council Member Brausen asked about the HRC and ESC plans for collaboration and whether the HRC has any interaction with other commissions. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated not at this time. Council Member Brausen thanked the HRC for their work and asked how the council can support them. Chair Lawler Turnbull stated that the council can continue to send ideas they think are important for the HRC to engage in and work on. She also noted there is a DEI commission forum in September 2025 and several HRC members will attend to connect with other DEI commissioners; more work may arise from the additional gathering. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin thanked the HRC for their work and for their collaboration with Golden Valley Pride Festival. 2. Title VI program Ms. Yang and Ms. Brodeen presented the staff report. Ms. Brodeen gave background on Title VI, noting the work on Title VI will now be expanded with a policy and a plan. She stated Title VI is a landmark civil rights law from 1986 that City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4d) Page 4 Title: Study session meeting minutes of September 8, 2025 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, and any program in receipt of federal assistance. Ms. Brodeen stated the city requires a Title VI program and public funds must not be used to discriminate. Over time, Title VI has also expanded to include discrimination based on age, sex and disability. In addition to Title VI, the city is subject to additional laws such as the Human Rights Act and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Ms. Brodeen shared that the work of Title VI aligns with the city’s strategic priorities of being a leader in race, equity, and inclusion. Equality is a value the community holds near and dear. The city will continue to work on equality and inclusion, and Title VI lays the foundation for such ideals. She stated Title VI allows the city to be intentional and proactive in removing barriers, creating access and building trust. Title VI will support the city in enacting its values. Ms. Yang presented details on immigrant populations in Minnesota and within St. Louis Park, including the languages most frequently spoken. Council Member Budd noted the language data was derived from the Minnesota Department of Education’s enrollment surveys. She understood from the St. Louis Park Emergency Program (STEP) that Russian is one of the top languages spoken in St. Louis Park. In a previous conversation, she had asked the director of STEP, Derek Reise, why Russian was not listed as a top language. Mr. Reise had explained that Russian is not spoken by younger populations; Russian is the third most frequently spoken in St. Louis Park. Ms. Yang stated that while staff utilizes U.S. Census information, the data is high-level and does not necessarily reflect the languages spoken in St. Louis Park. She noted that Russian, however, is within the top ten languages spoken in St. Louis Park based on the Minnesota Department of Education St. Louis Park School district enrollment data. Ms. Yang stated that a work group has been developed for the city to review Title VI and implement it through all city departments and services. She noted there will be review and feedback as the policy is being updated and will bring information back to the city council to review and approval for 2026. She added that a communication plan will be put in place for staff and residents to provide resources for all. Ms. Brodeen stated the HRC could assist in reviewing a draft plan of Title VI before it is brought to the council for review. She pointed out that during research, staff did not find any Title VI complaints in the city. Council Member Dumalag asked if there is a cost in the budget for creating the Title VI program and for resources. Ms. Yang stated yes, staff is working to allocate funds for the program and is working to hire a consultant this fall. Council Member Budd asked when the program will be launched. Ms. Yang stated the goal is to launch in January or February of 2026. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4d) Page 5 Title: Study session meeting minutes of September 8, 2025 Council Member Budd stated she received a complaint about discrimination related to the police department from a non-resident. She asked if the Title VI program is limited to only St. Louis Park residents. Ms. Yang stated the program would be related to any situation occurring in St. Louis Park. She added that in addition to the city’s discrimination reporting avenue, people can report discrimination through the Minnesota Human Rights Commission or to the Minnesota Department of Transportation. In addition to reporting an issue directly to the city, the city would also be informed if a complaint were filed with the Minnesota Human Rights Commission or the Minnesota Department of Transportation. Council Member Brausen stated Title VI is a good program and asked who is leading the effort. Ms. Yang stated that she and Ms. Brodeen are leading this effort. The workgroup comprises of police chief (Mr. Kruelle), fire chief (Mr. Hanlin), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), housing manager (Ms. Olson) and sustainability manager (Ms. Ziring). All are leaders within the city; nearly every department is represented. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin stated that current staff have never received a Title VI complaint, but that does not mean there has never been a situation warranting a complaint. Ms. Brodeen agreed and stated that it is possible that complaints could be under-reported and may exist. Hence, a significant part of the Title VI program is public participation to inform residents and community members of their rights to report discrimination when it occurs and to continue education with city staff to identify discrimination when it occurs and understand steps to address discrimination at the city. 3. Language access plan overview Ms. Yang, Ms. Smith and Ms. Hernandez Guitron presented the staff report. Ms. Yang pointed out that this plan is an extension of the Title VI program. Ms. Hernandez Guitron noted that on March 1, 2025, federal administration declared an executive order that English be the official language of the United States. She stated that the Department of Justice then rescinded prior limited English proficiency guidance, which has significantly weakened federal access frameworks. Ms. Hernandez Guitron stated that to support the diverse linguistic community in St. Louis Park and to ensure compliance with Title VI law, the city will implement a language access plan. The plan is designed to ensure everyone has equitable access to our city programs, services and activities. Staff will work with the communications division to produce a robust plan to provide guidance and meaningful access on how to engage with our limited English proficiency (LEP) communities, understand the federal law in alignment with Title VI for nondiscrimination and provide technical assistance. Ms. Yang noted a workgroup has been formed to work on the language access plan. The HRC will review the plan prior to bringing it back to the city council for implementation in 2026. Council Member Dumalag stated these services should be provided for residents, as language barriers and definitions can pose challenges. She appreciates the work being done in this space. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4d) Page 6 Title: Study session meeting minutes of September 8, 2025 Council Member Budd stated the program looks great, and she appreciates the city’s work. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin agreed that the language plan looks good. He noted the presidential executive order declaring English as national language versus compliance with Title VI law. He asked how the city would handle a hypothetical legal case. Ms. Keller stated her understanding is that an executive order is largely symbolic. Ultimately, the law is the law, so the city will continue to follow the law. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin asked if language resources in the city are available to all businesses within the city. Ms. Keller stated the best place to start is to help businesses know what resources are available. Written Reports 4. Racial equity and inclusion (REI) system kick-off Council Member Brausen asked whether a planned race equity and inclusion training for council members will take place soon. Ms. Keller suggested scheduling the training for the 2026 city council retreat. 5. Impact of changing property values in commercial and residential property types Mr. Bultema and Ms. Cruver were available for questions related to the written report. Ms. Cruver explained that the property tax levy is set through the budget process and then distributed among property taxpayers in the city according to their property type and taxable market value. Hennepin County finalizes the relevant net tax capacity for 2026 taxes in the middle of August, typically around the time the city is finalizing its preliminary levy. From year to year, the timing of when the city receives the information from the county can vary. Once those values are known, city staff can compute an estimated median value of a home’s property tax bill in the budget year 2026. Unfortunately, staff had not received the information from the county in time for the study session on Sept. 2, 2025. They had the information to conduct the analysis after the study session took place. Ms. Cruver noted the results included in the written report. Steady growth in residential values, combined with falling values in commercial buildings, particularly office buildings, is shifting a greater tax burden onto residential property owners. Staff wanted to get the information to the council now, before approving the preliminary levy on Monday, Sept. 15, 2025. Ms. Cruver stated that property tax statements will go out to residents in mid-November 2025, showing the preliminary tax estimates Council Member Budd noted that many items will be hitting residents with federal changes as well. With residential values continuing to increase, Council Member Budd asked what authority the city council has in supporting the adjustments. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4d) Page 7 Title: Study session meeting minutes of September 8, 2025 Ms. Cruver stated the rates applied to different classifications, and the percentage of taxable values paid on commercial and residential cannot be changed on the state level by anyone except the state legislature, noting these are set by state statute. She added that the city cannot plan for these underlying shifts in the value markets. She stated that those who have a property tax increase of higher than 12% can apply to the state for a partial refund. Council Member Dumalag asked how many residents in St. Louis Park have applied. Mr. Bultema stated that data can be requested from the Minnesota Department of Revenue. Council Member Budd stated the levy increase is in the city council’s control. She asked if the council would have to put the levy down to 0% to meet the median. Ms. Keller stated yes, along with significant cuts in services to meet the median. Ms. Cruver pointed out a levy of 0% would require a $4 million reduction in the city budget. Council Member Brausen commented that the levy is due to valuation and market increases for residences. The state has cushioned the increase to some extent with the option to apply for relief if their property tax increase is higher than 12%. However, the city cannot slice government services or proceed and let the taxpayers deal with the consequences. Council Member Budd added that the increases are also due to city expenses related to the cost of providing services. Ms. Keller noted that increases are unpredictable each year. Staff have some ideas that can be discussed in the fall regarding the 2027 budget season. For now, there are limited options available to address these increases. Ms. Cruver stated that Minneapolis, St. Paul and Duluth have cut many services to address the tax increases. The funding reduction is putting pressure on many cities. St. Louis Park will need to address the issue more immediately. She noted that Tax Increment Financing (TIF) funds in the affordable housing fund could be discontinued to address some of the increases. She added that the city will need to act by the fall of 2025 to address reduced funding. Mayor Pro Tem Baudhuin stated that changes will affect those who need housing assistance the most because the affordable housing fund would be depleted. Council Member Budd asked if any comparable cities have increases above 15% as their median point. Mr. Bultema stated that these value shifts are hugely abnormal. He stated comparable cities with heavy commercial sector tax capacity have these types of increases to an extent and noted the office sector is seeing difficulties. Ms. Cruver stated when it comes to the actual levy increase, there are many surrounding cities with higher percentage tax increases than St. Louis Park. Communications/meeting check-in (verbal) – none. The meeting adjourned at 7:36 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5a Executive summary Title: Approve city disbursements Recommended action: Motion to approve city disbursement claims for the period of Aug. 26 through Sept. 23, 2025. Policy consideration: Does the city council approve city disbursements for the period ending Sept. 23, 2025? Summary: The finance department prepares this monthly report for the city council to review and approve. The attached report shows all city disbursements made via physical check, wire transfer, and Automated Clearing House (ACH) where applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information by the council is required by the city charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Disbursement summary Prepared by: Estela Mulugeta, accounting specialist Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 657.003M COMPANY Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 657.00 295.004 FRONT ENERGY SOLUTIONS Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 295.00 332.00AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 332.00 40.88ABERNATHY, LISA Organized Rec G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 40.88 225.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 225.00 249.12ACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 249.12 37.97ADDAIR PAUL Water G&A 37.97 27.40ALDRICH MITCHELL Water G&A 27.40 1,023.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,023.00 200.00ALLIED BLACKTOP Community Development G&A Permits 200.00 318.00ALPHA VIDEO AND AUDIO INC Cable TV G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 318.00 95.58AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES City Clerk's Office G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 68.44Police G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 7,931.57Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 12.88Fire Department G&A Repairs, Maint, Serv on Tech 550.52Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 55.24Technology G&A Technology Supplies 8,714.23 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 2 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 83.81AMELSE MICHELLE Water G&A 83.81 1,203.89AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,179.83Franchise Fees G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,280.77Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 96.20Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 579.06Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 9,339.75 508.27AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 508.27 102.46ANDERSON TODD Water G&A 102.46 752.00APOLLO MEDICAL TRAINING Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 752.00 449.00ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION Natural Resources G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 449.00 3,573.80ASCENTEK INC General Fund BS Inventory 461.03Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 4,034.83 80.00ASPEN MILLS Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 551.00Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 631.00 60.00AT&T Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 60.00 662.25BACHMANSPark Improvement G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 662.25 147.22BALLARD DAVID Police G&A In-State Travel 147.22 700.00BALLISTIC DEFENSE LLC Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 700.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 3 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 500.00BANG ELECTRIC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 884.33Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,384.33 200.00BAQUERO ANTHONY Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 200.00 2,723.05BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS Rec Center Gen Division G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 2,723.05 149.35BENDEL WILLIAM Water G&A 149.35 344.44BERG COLIN Water G&A 344.44 240.00BERTHIAUME NICOLE Aquatic Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 240.00 100.00BEYER STEVE Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 100.00 598.24BIGLOW MARK Climate Investment G&A 256.38Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 854.62 1,610.00BIRNO BLAKE R.Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,610.00 590.00BIRNO LISA Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 590.00 1,610.00BIRNO, GRANT Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,610.00 590.00BIRNO, RICK Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 590.00 229.00BLAINE AREA PET HOSPITAL P.A Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 229.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 4 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,221.52BOLTON & MENK INC Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,255.67Franchise Fees G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,314.16Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,882.61Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 587.54Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 11,261.50 966.97BORDER STATES ELECTRIC- MPL Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 966.97 977.16BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 977.16 9,999.80BOYER TRUCKS Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 9,999.80 43.88BRUCE NELSON PLUMBING & HEATING Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 43.88 268.53BUDIG RITA Water G&A 268.53 25.00BUDISH ZACH Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 25.00 475.88BUILDING CONTROLS & SOLUTIONS Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 475.88 7,200.00BULLFROG INDUSTRIES Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 7,200.00 704.44BUSINESS ESSENTIALS Comm & Marketing G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 704.44 25.00BYINGTON SARAH Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 25.00 3,281.58CAMPBELL KNUTSON,P.A.General Fund BS GENERAL 12,633.30City Clerk's Office G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 741.60MSA Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 5 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 74.16Vehicle Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 16,730.64 236.73CAMPBELL SAMUEL Water G&A 236.73 70.95CANNADY MARIA Water G&A 70.95 3,848.00CANON FINANCIAL Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 3,848.00 25.00CARROLL MATT Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 25.00 10,111.64CDW GOVERNMENT INC Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Hardware 10,111.64 975.00CENTER FOR COACHING EXCELLENCE Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 975.00 49,650.00CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 500.00Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 50,150.00 20.77CENTERPOINT ENERGY Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3.26Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv .07Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1.58Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 25.68 21.00CENTRAL MCGOWAN INC Aquatic Division G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 2.00Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 23.00 11,370.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND Employee Benefits BS OTHER RETIREMENT 11,370.00 73.91CENTURY LINK Technology G&A Other Communications 73.91 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 6 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 100.00CHENEY ADAM Building and Energy G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 100.00 157.91CICHOWICZ EUGENE Water G&A 157.91 258.94CINTAS CORPORATION Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 85.41Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 25.12Public Works G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 192.59Water G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 30.12Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 70.93Park Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 45.18Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 42.00Aquatic Division G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 75.41Vehicle Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 316.30Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,142.00 5,082.51CITY OF BLOOMINGTON Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,082.51 3,447.00CITY OF NEW HOPE Aquatic Division G&A 3,447.00 1,000.00CLARK AARON General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 1,000.00 50.00CLASEMAN PAUL Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 50.00 410.78CLOUGH MICHAEL Water G&A 410.78 586.52COLE PAPERS Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 586.52 21,936.99COLICH & ASSOCIATES Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 21,936.99 1,444.00COLLINS ELECTRICAL Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance 1,444.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 7 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 62.15COMCASTPolice G&A Electric Utility 102.56Fire Department G&A Electric Utility 164.71 80.68CONSUMER INFO.COM Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 80.68 164.41COPA MICHAEL Water G&A 164.41 8,055.08CORE & MAIN LP Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 8,055.08 1,301.50CORPORATE MECHANICAL Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,301.50 50.00COWAN CHARLIE Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 50.00 2,383.91-CREATE CONSTRUCTION LLC General Fund BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 47,678.10Public Works G&A 465.99-Franchise Fees BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 9,319.80Franchise Fees G&A 2,821.41-Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 56,428.18Storm Water Utility G&A 107,754.77 30.67CREEKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION Neighborhood G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 30.67 602.49CROWN RENTAL - BURNSVILLE Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 602.49 119.00CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 119.00 10,900.00CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 10,900.00 1,998.68CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 8 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,123.17Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 881.68Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,003.53 539.41DALCO ENTERPRISES INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 539.41 66.19DAVIS TRENT Water G&A 66.19 130.94DELEGARD TOOL CO Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 130.94 12,837.69DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 12,837.69 100.00DETUNCQ SARA Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 100.00 7,300.00DITCH CREEK LANDSCAPE & EXCAVATING LLC Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 7,300.00 40.00DIVERSIFIED PLUMBING AND HEATING Building and Energy G&A Permits 40.00 2,150.00DO-GOOD.BIZ INC Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 25,256.56Comm & Marketing G&A Postage & Delivery 1,044.63Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 118.52Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 45.85Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,001.49Solid Waste G&A Postage & Delivery 180.50Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 32,797.55 572.97DOUANGLA MARIE DJATSA Water G&A 572.97 3,622.50EARL F ANDERSEN INC Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 3,622.50 398.12ECM PUBLISHERS INC City Clerk's Office G&A Postage & Delivery City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 9 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 398.12 132.00EDELMAN JAKE Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 132.00 527.86EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE General Fund BS Inventory 527.86 4,078.02ENTERPRISE FM TRUST Vehicle Maintenance G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 4,078.02 552.21ERICKSON RICHARD Climate Investment G&A 138.05Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 690.26 100.00ERICKSON RICHARD AND RUTH Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 100.00 1,225.75-EUREKA CONSTRUCTION INC.MSA Capital BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 122,574.67MSA Capital G&A 115.70-Water BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 11,570.00Water G&A 24.39-Sewer BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,439.11Sewer G&A 16.78-Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 1,677.92Storm Water Utility G&A 136,879.08 2,500.77FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO General Fund BS Inventory 98.25Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,599.02 665.00FAUL PSYCHOLOGICAL PLLC Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 665.00 226.83FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 226.83 164.28FERGUSON WATERWORKS Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 15,148.40Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 15,312.68 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 10 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 150.00FIDELIS SAFETY SOLUTIONS Fire Department G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 150.00 1,757.46FIRE SAFETY USA INC General Fund BS Inventory 1,757.46 183.55FIRST ADVANTAGE Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 183.55 489.92FOLKMANIS INC Westwood G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 489.92 7,250.00FORECAST PUBLIC ART Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 9,070.07Public Art G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 16,320.07 114.88FORTWENGLER NATASHA Water G&A 114.88 175.00FRANCIS, ERICK Storm Water Utility G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 175.00 25.49FRASER JOHN Water G&A 25.49 29.40FRIEDERICH NIKKI Organized Rec G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 29.40 117.19FROEHLICH JAMES Water G&A 117.19 25.00GALL ANDREA Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 25.00 1,510.86GILLEY AARON Police G&A Out-of-State Travel 1,510.86 231.91-GMH ASPHALT CORPORATION Street Capital BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 4,638.26Street Capital G&A 3,689.24-Franchise Fees BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 11 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 73,784.79Franchise Fees G&A 14,831.65-Water BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 296,632.98Water G&A 5,245.98-Sewer BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 104,919.64Sewer G&A 1,391.34-Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 27,826.82Storm Water Utility G&A 482,412.37 4,501.25GOERS LAND SURVEYING LLC Franchise Fees G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,423.75Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,925.00 2,145.60GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,634.24Organized Rec G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 4,779.84 70.54GRAHAM ANDREW Water G&A 70.54 1,139.68GRAINGER INC.Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,139.68 85,464.11GUARDIAN FLEET SAFETY Vehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch 85,464.11 50.00HARTERT JEREMY Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 50.00 22,786.22HAWKINS INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 2,305.88Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 25,092.10 873.30HEDBERG HOME Storm Water Utility G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 873.30 6.00HENNEPIN COUNTY Sunset Ridge HIA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6.00Greensboro HIA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6.00S. Cedar Trails HIA G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 18.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 12 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,518.84HENNEPIN COUNTY ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,518.84 425.00HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION Fire Department G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 425.00 25,369.04HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE Police G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 25,369.04 83.62HICKERSON, JANINE Climate Investment G&A 36.36Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 119.98 12,650.00HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 11,880.00Sewer G&A Repairs and Maintenance 24,530.00 41.45HI-LINE INC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 41.45 1,967.84HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,967.84 569.51HM CRAGG CRITICAL POWER Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 569.51 1,234.15HOUTS, BRIAN Neighborhood G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,234.15 82.00HULTSTRAND JOHN Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 82.00 5,638.00HUMERA TECH INC Park Improvement G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 5,638.00 120.00HUYNH MEI Rec Center Gen Division G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 120.00 2,095.00I & S GROUP INC Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,095.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 13 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,750.00I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES 1,750.00 2,325.71IDEAL COMMERCIAL INTERIORS LLC Municipal Building & Infra G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 2,325.71 4,713.91IDENTISYSHuman Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,713.91 301.86IH2 PROPERTY ILLINOIS Water G&A 301.86 1,445.15IMPACT POWER TO CONNECT Water G&A Postage & Delivery 1,445.13Sewer G&A Postage & Delivery 1,445.15Solid Waste G&A Postage & Delivery 1,445.15Storm Water Utility G&A Postage & Delivery 5,780.58 1,523.20INDELCOWater G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,523.20 271.37INGCO INTERNATIONAL Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 271.37 1,500.00INNOVATIVE BUILDING Storm Water Utility BS GENERAL 1,500.00 467.61INVER GROVE FORD General Fund BS Inventory 1,211.98Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 555.00Vehicle Maintenance G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 2,234.59 410.00ISI SPORTS INDUSTRY Rec Center Gen Division G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 410.00 900.00ISRAEL, DANIEL Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 900.00 103.32I-STATE TRUCK CENTER General Fund BS Inventory 103.32 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 14 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 64.64J & F REDDY RENTS Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 64.64 47.50J. BECHER & ASSOC.Street Capital G&A 194.74Franchise Fees G&A 175.74Water G&A 19.00Sewer G&A 38.00Storm Water Utility G&A 474.98 1,300.33JAYTECH, INC.Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,300.33 4,342.60JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 4,342.60 179.70JOHNSON LAUREN Water G&A 179.70 472.33JORGENSON AMY Neighborhood G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 472.33 32.00JRH PLUMBING LLC Building and Energy G&A Permits 32.00 306.89JURHS TAYLORGRACE Rec Center Gen Division G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 306.89 17.68KAMPA, MARK Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 17.68 2,782.50KENNEDY & GRAVEN City Clerk's Office G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,782.50 131.25KENS CARPENTRY LLC Water G&A 131.25 1,800.00KIDCREATE STUDIO Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,800.00 3,975.00KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC General Fund BS CO ESCROW City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 15 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,975.00 21,005.10KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 71,152.35MSA Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,383.26Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 922.01Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3,629.37Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 99,092.09 167.42KINGS III OF AMERICA LLC Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 167.42 59.22KLECHEFSKI LIVIA Community Development G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 59.22 10,603.85KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance 3,581.75Storm Water Utility G&A Repairs and Maintenance 14,185.60 47.21KNIPPENBERG MITCH Water G&A 47.21 98.26KOCOUERK MICHAEL Water G&A 98.26 9,810.00KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & ASSOCIATES INC Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 9,810.00 1,891.60KREMER SERVICES LLC Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,891.60 1,025.00KROOG, RACHAEL Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,025.00 45,000.00KURITA AMERICA, INC Water G&A 45,000.00 143.33KUYKENDALL DARLENE Water G&A 143.33 100.00LAVELLE RYAN Building and Energy G&A City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 16 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 100.00 4,467.62LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES 4,467.62 33,631.34LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 33,631.34 136,058.71LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST Finance G&A Property Insurance 286.54Cable TV G&A Property Insurance 521.83Housing Rehab G&A Property Insurance 38.37SSD 1 G&A Property Insurance 16.61SSD 2 G&A Property Insurance 19.19SSD 3 G&A Property Insurance 9.44SSD 4 G&A Property Insurance 9.44SSD 5 G&A Property Insurance 9.44SSD 6 G&A Property Insurance 8,589.80Development - EDA G&A Property Insurance 8,029.04Water G&A Property Insurance 18,787.44Sewer G&A Property Insurance 1,935.34Solid Waste G&A Property Insurance 1,790.81Storm Water Utility G&A Property Insurance 25,002.01Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance 201,104.01 50.00LEBESCH LUKE Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 50.00 151.45LEE, JON Water G&A 151.45 885.00LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 885.00 32.00LEIVERMANN CAITLIN Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 32.00 666.67LEXISNEXIS RISK SOLUTIONS Police G&A Software Licensing Less 12 Mo 666.67 1.00LI DARREN Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 17 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 80.00Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 81.00 478.10LIFE SUPPORT INNOVATIONS Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 478.10 15.00LIFESPRKFinance G&A Misc Expenditures 15.00 1,591.01LOFFLERTechnology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 1,591.01 313.02LOFFLER COMPANIES INC Technology G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 313.02 21.00LOMBARDI, JIM Organized Rec G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 21.00 5,896.00LYNCH CAMPS, INC Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,896.00 451.68M G INCENTIVES Human Resources G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 451.68 3,596.00MACQUEEN EQUIP CO General Fund BS Inventory 3,596.00 55.00MADETZKE MIKE Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 55.00 82.00MAINQUIST REED Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 82.00 46.76MALIK PRAKSHI Cable TV G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 46.76 63.62MALTBY MORGAN Water G&A 63.62 11,864.38MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY OF GAINSVILLE, INC General Fund BS Inventory 11,864.38 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 18 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,760.00MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,760.00 75.00MARTHALER JILL Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 75.00 2,014.54MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 3,045.24Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 12,061.97Water G&A 17,121.75 512.50MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 512.50 165.89MAWE LAURA Water G&A 165.89 2,063.65-MAX STEININGER Franchise Fees BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 41,272.97Franchise Fees G&A 1,171.45-Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 23,429.14Storm Water Utility G&A 61,467.01 345.13MCCASHIN BRENDAN Climate Investment G&A 147.91Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 493.04 282.37MCCASHIN BRIAN Water G&A 282.37 11.48MCCONNELL, BECKY Westwood G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 11.48 225.00MCMONIGAL ARCHITECTS LLC Housing Rehab G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 225.00 1,020.00MENENDEZ RODRIGO Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,020.00 33.07MENTON LUKE Water G&A City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 19 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 33.07 762,646.50METROPOLITAN COUNCIL Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 864,201.54Sewer G&A Water Utility 1,626,848.04 428.60MEYER, RODNEY Climate Investment G&A 183.68Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 612.28 40.38MGX EQUIPMENT SERVICES, LLC General Fund BS Inventory 40.38 10,198.02MIDWEST PLAYGROUND CONTRACTORS INC. Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 10,198.02 260.03MIELKE DANIEL Water G&A 260.03 88.00MILL CITY ELECTRIC CO Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 88.00 465.00MINNESOTA ASSOCIATION Cable TV G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 465.00 2,128.52MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR Employee Benefits BS WAGE GARNISHMENTS 2,128.52 33,473.00MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH Water G&A Water Utility 33,473.00 25,826.62MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT Vehicles & Equipment G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 25,826.62 1,162.00MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,162.00 272.88MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 177.12Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 450.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 20 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 440.00MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC Facilties Maintenance G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 2,490.00Organized Rec G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 99.00Park Maintenance G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 430.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 3,459.00 500.00MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC Water G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 500.00 504.00MISTER CAR WASH Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 504.00 8,000.00MOMENTUM ADVOCACY LLP Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 8,000.00 1,336.14MOORE ISAIAH Police G&A Out-of-State Travel 1,336.14 32.48MORSCH ANDREA Water G&A 32.48 156.42MOSKOWITZ JACK Water G&A 156.42 1,749.60MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS Police G&A Technology Devices 1,749.60 2,147.90MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC Public Saftey Aid G&A Technology Devices 2,147.90 4,260.00MPCASewer G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 55.00Sewer G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 4,315.00 662.78MPX GROUP Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 662.78 1,074.00MR CUTTING EDGE Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,074.00 139.60MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 21 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 139.60 1,953.48MTI DISTRIBUTING CO General Fund BS Inventory 1,953.48 900.00MULLEN MICHAEL General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 900.00 254.00MVTL LABORATORIES Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 254.00 1,125.00NAPAPolice G&A Misc Expenditures 1,125.00 1,033.43NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)General Fund BS Inventory 85.20Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 122.04Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,240.67 159.00NATIONAL GRANTS MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Adminstrative Operations G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 159.00 82.00NELSON MATT Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 82.00 15,176.12-NEW LOOK CONTRACTING INC Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 666,944.88Storm Water Utility G&A 651,768.76 3,327.35NEWMAN SIGNS INC Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 3,327.35 342.00NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC Building and Energy G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 342.00 22,444.00NORTH LIGHT COLOR INC Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 22,444.00 49.32NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 49.32 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 22 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 614.48NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC General Fund BS Inventory 614.48 .42NORTHLAND MECHANICAL Building and Energy G&A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 80.00Building and Energy G&A Permits 94.60Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 175.02 363.00NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 363.00 128.64NORTHSTAR MAINTENANCE MANAGEMENT INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 128.64 12,860.84-NORTHWEST ASPHALT INC.Franchise Fees BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 257,216.83Franchise Fees G&A 31.81-Sewer BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 636.29Sewer G&A 127.60-Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,551.96Storm Water Utility G&A 247,384.83 28,979.86NYSTROM PUBLISHING Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 28,979.86 767.00ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLC City Clerk's Office G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 319.67Human Resources G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 52.49Community Development G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 156.75Building and Energy G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 45.28Public Works G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 138.58Westwood G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 8.90Vehicle Maintenance G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 1,488.67 99.40OELRICH JETHRO Assessing G&A Employee Mileage Reimbursement 99.40 795.65OFFICE OF MNIT SERVICES Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software 795.65 6,440.00ON SITE SANITATION Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 23 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 134.00Park Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 150.00Westwood G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,724.00 616.90O'NEIL THOMAS G Climate Investment G&A 154.23Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 771.13 75.73O'REILLY FIRST CALL General Fund BS Inventory 75.73 88.00OUVERSON SEWER & WATER INC Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 88.00 824.24OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 824.24 347.00PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 347.00 31,852.07-PARK CONSTRUCTION CO Street Capital BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 637,041.47Street Capital G&A 523.46-Franchise Fees BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 10,469.16Franchise Fees G&A 19,450.74-Water BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 389,014.77Water G&A 4,542.31-Sewer BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 90,846.15Sewer G&A 3,951.45-Storm Water Utility BS RETAINAGE PAYABLE 79,028.95Storm Water Utility G&A 1,146,080.47 5,123.18PARK TAVERN Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,123.18 141.81PATRICK MICHAEL Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 141.81 244.35PEREZ KIANA Water G&A 244.35 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 24 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 25.00PERKINS ALEX Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 25.00 134.04PERKINS GABRIELE Water G&A 134.04 2,100.00PETERSON COMPANIES Storm Water Utility BS GENERAL 2,100.00 463.18PETERSON KRISTEN Water G&A 463.18 3,392.79PHILIP'S TREE CARE LLC Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3,392.79 132.00PIEHL, BRIAN Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 132.00 2,327.52PMA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS Misc Expenditures 2,327.52 1,300.00POKORNY SARA Climate Investment G&A 1,300.00 814.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 814.00 327.75PRECISE MRM, LLC.Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 327.75Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 327.75Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 327.75Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,311.00 132.37PREMIUM WATERS Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 132.37 56.70PRO-TREE OUTDOOR SERVICES Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 56.70 102.78QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER Vehicle Maintenance G&A Postage & Delivery 102.78 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 25 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 8,613.00RAINBOW TREECARE Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 8,613.00 377.27REALTY PROS LLC Water G&A 377.27 300.00RECYCLING ASSOC OF MN Solid Waste G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 300.00 75.00REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 75.00 9,064.63REPUBLIC SERVICES Facilties Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility 8,374.84Rec Center Gen Division G&A Solid Waste Utility 17,439.47 5,554.48REVOLUTIONARY SPORTS LLC Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 5,554.48 436.32ROBERT B HILL CO Rec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 436.32 1,194.89ROCK HARD LANDSCAPE SUPPLY Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,194.89 90.00ROSENFELD MICHAEL Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 90.00 16.35ROSETTA VINCENT Water G&A 16.35 20.50RYNDA MELISSA Building and Energy G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 20.50 979.20SAFE-FAST INC Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 979.20 154,924.00SAXON FLEET SERVICES Vehicle Maintenance G&A Other Cap Equip Purchased 154,924.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 26 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 25.00SENGER AUSTIN Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 25.00 375.00SETS DESIGN INC.Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 375.00 1,075.00SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,075.00 562.34SHAPCO PRINTING INC Adminstrative Operations G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 682.50Comm & Marketing G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,124.66Comm & Marketing G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 682.50Police G&A Postage & Delivery 3,052.00 20,679.05SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 13,217.45Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,652.20Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 35,548.70 62.80SHRESTHA BIJAY Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 62.80 2,968.00SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 2,968.00 453.53SILVER SARAH Water G&A 453.53 3,223.07SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 Employee Benefits BS UNION DUES 3,223.07 11,565.00SOCCER SHOTS Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 11,565.00 493.23SOMMER MOLLIE Water G&A 493.23 534.00SOUTH METRO PUBLIC SAFETY TRAINING FAC Fire Department G&A Other Travel, Conv & Conf 534.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 27 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 300.00SOUTHSIDE BAND Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 300.00 201.39SPOFFORD DYLAN Water G&A 201.39 454.92-SPS COMPANIES INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 61.93Facilties Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 152.50Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 297.33Park Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 13.80Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 70.64 8,962.50SQUARERIGGER SOFTWARE Technology G&A Capitalized Tech Software 8,962.50 66.00SQUIRE DUSTIN Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 66.00 3,309.74SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC Engineering G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,162.19Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 7,471.93 22,898.00ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY Affordable H Trust G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 22,898.00 28.00STERICYCLE, INC.Finance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 76.62Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 169.81Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 484.84Public Works G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 759.27 1,500.00STONEWOOD HARDSCAPES & DESIGN LLC Storm Water Utility BS GENERAL 1,500.00 5,450.00STRATUS BUILDING SOLUTIONS OF ST. PAUL Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,850.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,190.00Aquatic Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 9,490.00 12,033.55STREICHER'S Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 28 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 12,033.55 830.00SUBURBAN RATE AUTHORITY Water G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 830.00Sewer G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 830.00Storm Water Utility G&A Dues, Memberships, Licenses 2,490.00 13,379.12SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC Water Reilly G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 13,379.12 200.00SUMMIT FIRE PROTECTION Building and Energy G&A Permits 200.00 350.00SUNDEM AMY Building and Energy G&A Permits 350.00 1,021.73SYSCO-MINNESOTA INC Aquatic Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,021.73 269.95TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC Police E-911 Restriction G&A Technology Supplies 269.95 1,100.00TARA BOUNKEOVISANE & CHRIS MARVIN General Fund BS UNION PARK APTS 1,100.00 500.00TASTE OF INDIA City Clerk's Office G&A Licenses 500.00 1,766.83TENNANT SALES AND SERVICE CO.Vehicle Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,766.83 478.00TERMINIX COMMERCIAL Facilties Maintenance G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 131.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 609.00 3,000.00TGA OF CENTRAL HENNEPIN COUNTY Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3,000.00 3,380.00THE DAVEY TREE EXPERT COMPANY Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3,380.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 29 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 455.73THE MITOGRAPHERS INC Building and Energy G&A Admin/Office Supplies & Mat 455.73 102.54THE STANDARD Adminstrative Operations G&A LIFE INSURANCE 91.54Adminstrative Operations G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 48.38City Clerk's Office G&A LIFE INSURANCE 38.12City Clerk's Office G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 56.29REI G&A LIFE INSURANCE 44.43REI G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 92.98Human Resources G&A LIFE INSURANCE 77.13Human Resources G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 102.19Comm & Marketing G&A LIFE INSURANCE 84.26Comm & Marketing G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 109.50IT G&A LIFE INSURANCE 86.63IT G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 120.71Assessing G&A LIFE INSURANCE 98.36Assessing G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 158.59Finance G&A LIFE INSURANCE 130.33Finance G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 268.33Community Development G&A LIFE INSURANCE 246.83Community Development G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 13.10HA - Housing Choice Voucher LIFE INSURANCE 112.10Facilties Maintenance G&A LIFE INSURANCE 94.51Facilties Maintenance G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 1,299.65Police G&A LIFE INSURANCE 1,059.09Police G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 145.26Dispatch Division G&A LIFE INSURANCE 114.55Dispatch Division G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 684.05Fire Department G&A LIFE INSURANCE 534.17Fire Department G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 364.03Building and Energy G&A LIFE INSURANCE 294.16Building and Energy G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 52.39Sustainability G&A LIFE INSURANCE 41.32Sustainability G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 235.17Engineering G&A LIFE INSURANCE 187.54Engineering G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 307.51Public Works G&A LIFE INSURANCE 245.95Public Works G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 43.42Cable TV G&A LIFE INSURANCE 34.26Cable TV G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 14.51Development - EDA G&A LIFE INSURANCE City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 30 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 119.89Water G&A LIFE INSURANCE 94.15Water G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 53.81Sewer G&A LIFE INSURANCE 43.20Sewer G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 54.16Solid Waste G&A LIFE INSURANCE 43.02Solid Waste G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 105.14Storm Water Utility G&A LIFE INSURANCE 82.91Storm Water Utility G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 6,638.28Employee Benefits G&A LIFE INSURANCE 150.69Organized Rec G&A LIFE INSURANCE 122.95Organized Rec G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 176.76Park Maintenance G&A LIFE INSURANCE 140.90Park Maintenance G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 34.22Natural Resources G&A LIFE INSURANCE 26.99Natural Resources G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 97.11Westwood G&A LIFE INSURANCE 76.56Westwood G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 105.37Rec Center Gen Division G&A LIFE INSURANCE 81.98Rec Center Gen Division G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 100.89Vehicle Maintenance G&A LIFE INSURANCE 79.49Vehicle Maintenance G&A LONG TERM DISABILITY 16,262.35 30.45THOMAS CARMEN Water G&A 30.45 102.00THOR ELECTRIC Building and Energy G&A 102.00 2,369.76TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL City Clerk's Office G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 2,369.76 330.00T-MOBILE USA INC Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 330.00 82.00TOGSTAD BROTEN Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 82.00 13.64TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 13.64 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 31 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,540.00TOP NOTCH EQUIPMENT INC Natural Resources G&A Short Term Lease/Rentals Pay 1,540.00 500.00TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT KIDS DANCE Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 500.00 6,710.48TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC.Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 6,710.48 1,695.00TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC Facilties Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 1,995.00Park Maintenance G&A Repairs and Maintenance 3,690.00 3,895.00TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 8,661.00Property Casualty G&A Property Insurance 12,556.00 10,000.00TREE TRUST Park Improvement G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 6,591.60Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 16,591.60 146.33TRUETT MATTHEW Water G&A 146.33 50.00TUFTE TRAVIS Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 50.00 400.00TWIN CITIES SKATERS Organized Rec G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 400.00 600.00TYSLEY TAYLOR Adminstrative Operations G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 600.00 245.25ULINERec Center Gen Division G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 246.67Vehicle Maintenance G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 491.92 9,082.20ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC Fire Department G&A Repairs and Maintenance 9,082.20 1,250.00UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS Police G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 32 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,250.00 163.10UPPER MISSISSIPPI IRRIGATION Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 163.10 1,600.00US INTERNET Water G&A Misc Expenditures 1,600.00 28,700.00VALLEY-RICH CO INC Water G&A Repairs and Maintenance 16,200.00Sewer G&A Repairs and Maintenance 44,900.00 139.87VANCURA JOE Water G&A 139.87 186.10VEITCH ASHLEY & IAN Water G&A 186.10 29.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS LLC.Human Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 29.00 34,106.89VERIZONIT G&A Telephone Communications 34,106.89 150.00VERIZON WIRELESS Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 150.00 2,900.00VETERAN ELECTRIC Park Improvement G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 600.00Rec Center Gen Division G&A Repairs and Maintenance 3,500.00 576.00VINCENT PROMOTIONS LLC Police G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 576.00 4,500.00VINELAND TREE CARE Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,500.00 96.00VORPAHL RITA Human Resources G&A In-State Travel 96.00 132.00VOTEL JACOB Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 33 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 132.00 50.00WALKER MAX Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 50.00 82.00WALLIN ADAM Organized Rec G&A Refunds/Reimbursements 82.00 770.70WARNING LITES OF MN INC Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,819.60Water G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,308.90Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 3,899.20 82,294.46WASTE CONTAINER SYST Solid Waste G&A Yard Waste Utility 82,294.46 1,586.20WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,586.20 187.46WDW ELECTRIC Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 187.46 39.43WEBER CRAIG Water G&A 39.43 359.80WHIPPER SNAPPER LAWN SERVICE Natural Resources G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 359.80 950.96WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC Fire Department G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 950.96 5,317.07WM CORPORATE SERVICES INC Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,329.41Park Maintenance G&A Solid Waste Utility 6,646.48 1,713.53WM MUELLER & SONS INC Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 1,713.53 78.00WOLF RIVER ELECTRIC Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 78.00 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 34 CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK Council Check Summary 9/23/20258/26/2025 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,500.00WOODS BRENT Storm Water Utility BS GENERAL 1,500.00 846.00WS & D PERMIT SERVICE Building and Energy G&A Construction Permits 264.00Building and Energy G&A 1,110.00 964.00WSB ASSOC INC Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 15,384.50Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 16,348.50 7,692.05XCEL ENERGY Facilties Maintenance G&A Electric Utility 648.56Public Works G&A Electric Utility 97.26Street Capital G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 15.26Water G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 37,629.47Water G&A Electric Utility 1,409.46Water Reilly G&A Electric Utility .35Sewer G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 10,696.39Sewer G&A Electric Utility 7.41Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 4,152.67Storm Water Utility G&A Electric Utility 647.37Park Maintenance G&A Electric Utility 5,000.66Rec Center Gen Division G&A Electric Utility 67,996.91 1,382.50YOUNG ENV. CONSULTING GROUP, LLC. Storm Water Utility G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 1,382.50 7,492.00ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC Public Works G&A Operations Supplies & Mat 7,492.00 892.14ZIEBART OF MINNESOTA INC Vehicles & Equipment G&A Vehicles/Machinery Purch 892.14 360.00ZUPANC TIMOTHY Rec Center Gen Division G&A Consulting Fees/Fees For Serv 360.00 Report Totals 6,368,996.81 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approve city disbursements Page 35 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5b Executive summary Title: Resolution accepting donations to the parks and recreation department Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution accepting donations totaling $2,546 for Westwood Hills Nature Center in the parks and recreation department. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept these donations with restrictions on their use? Summary: State statute requires the city council to formally accept donations. This requirement is necessary to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. • Donation for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center to celebrate grandson Paul’s 4th birthday. o Tammi Rooyakkers, $25 • Donation for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center. o Coalition9, $250 • Donations for park enhancements at Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring Zita Zogg. o Arlette Barnhiser, $1,831 o Dorothy and James Hautman, $100 o Gerald and Kristy Blick, $35 o Heidi Ebert, $25 o Jill and Todd Theiss, $25 o Judith Bennett, $25 o Merlin and Jean Helgemoe, $100 o Pauline and John Carroll, $30 o Sarah and Robert Gabler, $100 Financial or budget considerations: These donations will be used for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Carrie Mandler, secretary program aide Reviewed by: Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center manager Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator Jason T. West, parks and recreation director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 2 Title: Resolution accepting donations to the parks and recreation department Resolution No. 25 - ___ Accepting donations totaling $2,546 for Westwood Hills Nature Center Whereas the City of St. Louis Park is required by state statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and Whereas the city council must also approve any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and Whereas, Tammi Rooyakkers donated $25 for park enhancements or program needs to celebrate her grandson Paul’s 4th birthday; Coalition9 donated $250 for park enhancements or program needs; and Arlette Barnhiser donated $1,831, Sarah and Robert Gabler donated $100, Dorothy and James Hautman donated $100, Merlin and Jean Helgemore donated $100, Jill and Todd Theiss donated $25, Heidi Ebert donated $25, Judith Bennett donated $25, Gerald and Kristy Blick donated $35 and Pauline and John Carroll donated $30, all for park enhancements at Westwood Hills Nature Center in honor of Zita Zogg. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that these donations are hereby accepted with thanks to Tammi Rooyakkers and Coalition9, with the understanding that their gifts must be used for park enhancements or program needs, and to Arlette Barnhiser, Sarah and Robert Gabler, Dorothy and James Hautman, Merlin and Jean Helgemore, Jill and Todd Theiss, Heidi Ebert, Judith Bennett, Gerald and Kristy Blick, and Pauline and John Carroll, with the understanding that their gifts must be used for park enhancements at Westwood Hills Nature Center. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5c Executive summary Title: Resolution accepting donations to the police department for police investigation Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Brian Pinter, Kelly Pinter, Ken Neyhard and Kathy Neyhard in the name of Mike Adelson in an amount not to exceed $200 for police investigation. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. Brian Pinter, Kelly Pinter, Ken Neyhard and Kathy Neyhard in the name of Mike Adelson is graciously donating up to $200 for police investigation expenses. The donated money will be used for investigative endeavors and offset administrative costs associated with solving crimes in the community. Financial or budget considerations: This donation will be used toward police investigations. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Dennis Hagen, lieutenant Reviewed by: Bryan Kruelle, police chief Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5c) Page 2 Title: Resolution accepting donations to the police department for police investigation Resolution No. 25 - ____ Accepting a donation from Brian Pinter, Kelly Pinter, Ken Neyhard and Kathy Neyhard in the name of Mike Adelson for police investigation expenses Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by State Statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and Whereas, Brian Pinter, Kelly Pinter, Ken Neyhard and Kathy Neyhard in the name of Mike Adelson compensate up to $200 in costs for the police department’s expenses related to police investigations, Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to Brian Pinter, Kelly Pinter, Ken Neyhard and Kathy Neyhard, with the understanding that it will be used to offset expenses associated with police investigations. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5d Executive summary Title: Resolution accepting a donation to the police department for K9 officers Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Community Charities of MN in an amount not to exceed $2,500 for police expenses related to K9 officers. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. Community Charities of MN has graciously donated up to $2,500 for police expenses related to K9 officers. The donated money would be used for expenses such as K9 training, equipment, veterinary visits and food. Financial or budget considerations: This donation will be used toward police expenses related to K9 officers. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Paul Barnes, lieutenant Reviewed by: Bryan Kruelle, police chief Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 2 Title: Resolution accepting a donation to the police department for K9 officers Resolution No. 25 - ____ Accepting a donation from Community Charities of MN for police K9 officer expenses Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by State Statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and Whereas, Community Charities of MN compensated up to $2,500 in costs for the police department’s expenses related to the police K9 officers, Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to Community Charities of MN with the understanding that it will be used for expenses related to the police K9 officer expenses. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5e Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on Wayzata Boulevard east of Ford Road - Ward 4 Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution authorizing a 50-foot section of parking restrictions on the south side of Wayzata Boulevard east of Ford Road. Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed parking restrictions to allow public works access to a sanitary sewer manhole? Summary: The public works department is requesting the installation of permanent “No Parking” signage along a 50-foot section of the south curb line of Wayzata Boulevard. This change is needed to ensure reliable access to a sanitary sewer manhole located in the parking lane, which is routinely obstructed by parked vehicles from the adjacent apartments. This manhole serves as the primary drainage point for the entire Shelard Park area and requires routine maintenance to prevent service disruptions. When blocked, public works crews are unable to perform scheduled inspections or respond quickly to emergencies. To address this issue, the city is proposing a permanent “No Parking” zone of 50 feet on the affected portion of Wayzata Boulevard. Keeping this area clear will allow maintenance crews to access the manhole safely and efficiently at all times. Staff notified adjacent businesses and apartment managers about the proposed “No Parking” zone. No concerns or objections were raised regarding the installation of signage to prohibit parking over the sanitary sewer manhole. Financial or budget considerations: The cost of installing the parking prohibition signage is estimated to be $250 and will come out of the general operating budget. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Location map Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, assistant city engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on Wayzata Boulevard east of Ford Road - Ward 4 Resolution No. 25-___ Authorizing parking restrictions on Wayzata Boulevard east of Ford Road adjacent to a sanitary sewer manhole Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park public works department requested restricting parking along a section of the south curb line of Wayzata Boulevard, east of Ford Road, to provide access to a sanitary sewer manhole; and Whereas, the sanitary sewer manhole is in the parking lane and is frequently blocked by parked vehicles; and Whereas, when blocked, public works cannot perform routine inspections or respond to emergencies; and Whereas, signing a 50-foot section “no parking” will allow public works maintenance crews access to the manhole, Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the engineering director is authorized to: 1. Install “No Parking” signage for a 50-foot section of the south curb line of Wayzata Boulevard, east of Ford Road, adjacent to a sanitary sewer manhole. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk S H E L A R D P K W Y F O R D L N S E R V I C E D R H W Y 1 6 9 W H I G H W A Y 1 6 9 F O R D R D I N T E R S T A T E 3 9 4 310 320330 340 350 390 600 400 300 435 301 450 460 462 464 1155 9950 500 9808 255 9970 9920 46 0 500 1,000250 Feetp Proposed No Parking for sanitary manhole access Proposed no parking Existing no parking Parking allowed Date: 9/22/2025 Proposed no parking City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Title: Resolution authorizing parking restrictions on Wayzata Boulevard east of Ford Road - Ward 4 Page 3 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5f Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing parking prohibitions on South MN 7 Service Drive - Ward 1 Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution authorizing parking prohibitions on both sides of the South MN 7 Service Drive, west of Beltline Boulevard. Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed parking prohibitions on both sides of the South MN 7 Service Drive? Summary: The city has received a formal request to prohibit parking on both sides of South MN 7 Service Drive, west of Beltline Boulevard. The presence of on-street parking in this area has impeded access for larger delivery vehicles attempting to reach nearby commercial businesses. Following a comprehensive review, the engineering department presented the request and its findings to the city’s traffic committee for further evaluation. The traffic committee is an internal multidisciplinary workgroup composed of representatives from engineering, public works, police and community development. This committee convenes monthly to assess traffic- related concerns and provide recommendations for potential improvements. After reviewing the request, the traffic committee recommends implementing a full parking prohibition along both sides of South MN 7 Service Drive, extending from Beltline Boulevard to the cul-de-sac. This measure is deemed necessary to facilitate safe and efficient access for large delivery vehicles and to ensure unobstructed entry to the delivery docks of adjacent businesses. The affected businesses have expressed support for the proposed parking prohibitions. Parking will remain in the four designated stalls located within the cul-de-sac adjacent to Lilac Park. Financial or budget considerations: The cost of installing the parking prohibition signage is estimated to be $2,000 and will come out of the general operating budget. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Resolution Location map Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, assistant city engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5f) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing parking prohibitions on South MN 7 Service Drive - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-___ Authorizing parking prohibitions on South MN 7 Service Drive Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park received requests from adjacent businesses to restrict on-street parking along the South MN 7 Service Drive; and Whereas, the commercial land use and accompanying businesses received deliveries by large commercial semi-trucks; and Whereas, on-street parking does not provide adequate room for commercial vehicle turning movements; and Whereas, the majority of the road is not wide enough to accommodate commercial trucks when vehicles are parked along the curb; and Whereas, prohibiting all on-street parking will ensure unobstructed access for commercial vehicles to adjacent businesses and provide sufficient roadway width for large trucks to maneuver safely and efficiently, Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the engineering director is authorized to: 1. Install “No Parking” signage along both sides of the South MN 7 Service Drive west of Beltline Boulevard. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Proposed No Parking along South MN 7 Service Drive B A C K A G E R D B E L T L I N E B L V D N O R T H M N 7 S E R V I C E D R I V E S O U T H M N 7 S E R V I C E D R I V EC O U N T Y R O A D 2 5 4801 4725 5051 4600 4700 4800 5005 m Date: 9/26/2025 0 500 1,000250 Feet Extra Space Storage Nordic Ware Nordic Ware Proposed no parking City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5f) Title: Resolution authorizing parking prohibitions on South MN 7 Service Drive - Ward 1 Page 3 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5g Executive summary Title: Resolution rescinding parking prohibitions near 3312 Gorham Avenue - Ward 3 Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution rescinding Resolution No. 98-84, removing outdated parking restrictions near 3312 Gorham Avenue. Policy consideration: None. Summary: The engineering department recommends rescinding the parking restrictions adjacent to 3312 Gorham Avenue, where a designated “Loading Zone” currently exists. This recommendation follows a community inquiry noting that the business, which originally required the loading zone, has vacated the premises. Upon review, staff confirmed that Traffic Study No. 530, conducted in June 1998, supported a request from Community Connections Partnership, the former occupant of 3312 Gorham Avenue. The organization, which provided vocational services to individuals with physical and developmental disabilities, requested a no-parking zone to ensure safe loading and unloading of clients. Following the study, city council adopted Resolution No. 98-84 in June 1998 and “Loading Zone” signage was installed shortly thereafter. Community Connections Partnership vacated the site and a new business took occupancy in May 2022. Staff sent a letter to the businesses along this block of Gorham Avenue recommending the removal of the loading zone. No concerns were raised regarding its removal. Following a review of the current parking conditions, the findings were presented to the traffic committee for consideration. Based on the evaluation, the engineering department recommends formally rescinding Resolution No. 98-84. This action would eliminate the outdated parking restriction and restore public parking access in the affected area, aligning with current community needs and improving accessibility. Financial or budget considerations: The cost of removing the parking restriction signage is negligible and will come out of the general operating budget. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Resolution No. 98-84 - to be rescinded Location map Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, assistant city engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5g) Page 2 Title: Resolution rescinding parking prohibitions near 3312 Gorham Avenue - Ward 3 Resolution No. 25 - ____ Rescind Resolution No. 98-84 restricting parking on the west side of Gorham Avenue, adjacent to 3312 Gorham Avenue Whereas, existing parking restrictions at 3312 Gorham Avenue were approved in 1998 per Resolution No. 98-84 to address the loading and unloading of persons with disabilities adjacent to the business; and Whereas, the city was informed that the business is no longer at this location; and Whereas, parking restrictions specific to the former business are no longer needed due to changes in site use; and Whereas, staff sent a letter to adjacent businesses informing them of the recommendation to remove the load zone; and Whereas, staff recommends formally rescinding resolution no. 98-84 to eliminate the outdated parking restriction and restore public parking access in the area, Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that Resolution No. 98-84 is rescinded. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Freedom Park 3 3 3 4 3 3 2 9 3 2 5 1 3 3 1 8 3 3 1 6 3 3 2 5 3 3 1 7 3 3 2 0 3 5 0 1 3 3 2 1 3 2 9 7 3 3 3 7 3 3 1 2 3 3 0 8 3 3 2 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 0 5 3 4 0 1 3 3 4 0 3 3 2 4 3 3 3 8 3 3 0 9 3 3 4 3 3 3 0 0 3 3 0 1 3 3 2 6 3 3 0 43 2 8 0 3 3 1 3 2N D S T N W G O R H A M A V E 1ST S T N W O A K L E A F D R R E P U B L I C A V E B R O W N L O W A V E 0 200 400100 Feeƚk Daƚe͗ 7ͬ10ͬ2025 EdžŝƐƟŶŐ ůoadŝŶŐ njoŶe ƚo ďe remoǀed 3312 GorŚam EdžŝƐƟŶŐ LoadŝŶŐ oŶe City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5g) Title: Resolution rescinding parking prohibitions near 3312 Gorham Avenue - Ward 3 Page 3 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5h Executive summary Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Recommended action: Motion to adopt the following resolutions: • Rescind Resolution No. 93-197 pertaining to existing stop sign controls along the South MN 7 Service Drive at Inglewood and Joppa Avenues • Authorize traffic controls at the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue • Authorize traffic control at the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue • Authorize traffic controls at the intersection of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue • Authorize no parking at the intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard and Glenhurst Avenue, and on Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed traffic control changes and parking restrictions near the reconfigured Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 intersection? Summary: As part of Hennepin County’s recent reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25, several roadway configurations have been updated to better serve the surrounding community, including local businesses and residents. In response to these changes, city staff conducted a comprehensive review of existing traffic control and parking signage to ensure alignment with current traffic patterns. Based on this review, staff recommend the following adjustments. Stop sign removals: • At the westbound and eastbound approaches of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue • At the westbound and southbound approaches of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue Installation of “No Parking” signage: • Intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard and Glenhurst Avenue • Local segment of Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue To proceed with these changes, one resolution must be rescinded and four new resolutions adopted. Further details regarding these recommendations are available in the discussion section of the report. Financial or budget considerations: The cost of installing the parking prohibition signage is estimated to be $900 and will come out of the general operating budget. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion, Resolution No. 93-197 to be rescinded, Resolutions, Location maps Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, assistant city engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 2 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Discussion Background: Hennepin County started reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 in 2024, with project completion anticipated in the fall of 2025. The construction has made significant enhancements to both the roadway and sidewalk/trail network at the confluence of these roads and has resulted in a transformed and more accessible area for all users. As the project nears completion, city staff have conducted a review of current signage to ensure alignment with updated traffic patterns and community needs. Staff identified opportunities to further enhance traffic operations through updates to existing traffic control and parking regulations along several reconfigured roadway segments: 1. Intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue Inglewood Avenue is now disconnected from the eastbound County Road 25. • Remove stop signs at the westbound and eastbound approaches of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue. • All other existing stop signs are to remain. 2. Intersection of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue A portion of the service drive east of Joppa Avenue (behind Starbucks) has been removed. • Remove stop signs at the westbound and southbound approaches of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue. • All other existing stop signs are to remain. 3. Local section of Minnetonka Boulevard near Glenhurst and Huntington avenues The project created a segment of Minnetonka Boulevard that is under city jurisdiction. • Install “No Parking” signage at the intersection of Glenhurst Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard. • Install “No Parking” signage on the local segment of Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue. To proceed with these changes, one resolution must be rescinded and four new resolutions adopted. Present considerations: To address the changes to the roadways and intersections within the construction limits, staff are recommending the following resolutions to address stop sign changes and the installation of “No Parking” signage. All changes are illustrated in the attached graphics. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 3 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Intersection Current traffic controls/parking restrictions Reason for change Proposed traffic controls/parking restrictions Resolutions South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue All-way stop signs Inglewood Avenue is now disconnected from the eastbound County Road 25. Stop signs for eastbound and westbound traffic near Parkway 25 apartments are no longer necessary. Stop sign at the northbound approach of Inglewood Avenue. • Rescind Resolution No. 93-197 pertaining to existing stop sign controls along the South MN 7 Service Drive at Joppa and Inglewood Avenues - to allow the intersection control to be modified by subsequent resolutions into two separate resolutions. • Authorize stop signs at South MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue - keep the intersection control as currently configured, breaking it out to a singular resolution. • Authorize a stop sign at South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue for only northbound Inglewood Avenue - does not reestablish the stop signs for eastbound and westbound South MN 7 Service Drive. North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue All-way stop signs A portion of the service drive east of Joppa Avenue (behind Starbucks) has been removed, creating a T- intersection. Stop signs at the westbound and Stop sign at the eastbound approach of the intersection. • Authorize stop sign for eastbound approach of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue, and southbound approach of the intersection of Joppa Avenue and County Road 25 - does not reestablish a stop sign for westbound and southbound City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 4 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Intersection Current traffic controls/parking restrictions Reason for change Proposed traffic controls/parking restrictions Resolutions southbound approaches of the intersection are no longer needed. approaches of the intersection of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue. Glenhurst Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard, and the local section of Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue None To improve traffic flow and accommodate turning vehicles, delivery trucks and winter maintenance equipment on the newly created segment of Minnetonka Boulevard. These areas did not previously allow parking, so the proposed signage will not reduce available parking in the area. No parking at the intersection of Glenhurst Avenue/Minnetonka Boulevard and on the local segment of Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue. • Authorize no parking at the intersection of Glenhurst Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard and on Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue. Community feedback: Businesses and residents located near the proposed changes to intersection controls and parking restrictions have been notified of the recommendations and given an opportunity to provide input. To date, community response has been limited, with only one comment received regarding the proposed updates. The comment pertained to the intersection of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue. The individual believes that Joppa Avenue southbound traffic needs to stop since there is no traffic control for the westbound traffic that comes from County Road 25 and turns left to continue traveling on the North MN 7 Service Drive. Next steps: If the resolutions are approved by the council, the stop signs will be removed, and the no parking signage will be installed with the Hennepin County reconstruction project this fall. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 5 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-095 Rescind Resolution No. 93-197 pertaining to existing stop sign controls along the South MN 7 Service Drive at Joppa and Inglewood avenues Whereas, Hennepin County is completing the reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25. The construction has changed several roadway configurations to better serve the surrounding community, including local businesses and residents; and Whereas, in response to these changes, city staff conducted a comprehensive review of existing traffic control and parking signage to ensure alignment with current traffic patterns; and Whereas, the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue is now disconnected from eastbound County Road 25; and Whereas, the engineering staff has reviewed the changes to the intersection configuration and recommend removal of the stop signs at the westbound and eastbound approaches of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue; and Whereas, the existing intersection control at this intersection and the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue was approved in 1993 per Resolution No. 93-197; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park will establish new resolutions to authorize intersection control at both intersections, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the following resolution is hereby rescinded: 1. Resolution No. 93-197, stop sign controls at the intersections of South MN 7 Service Drive at Joppa and Inglewood Avenues. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 6 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-096 Authorize stop signs at the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue Whereas, Hennepin County is completing the reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25. The construction has changed several roadway configurations to better serve the surrounding community, including local businesses and residents; and Whereas, in response to these changes, city staff conducted a comprehensive review of existing traffic control to ensure alignment with current traffic patterns; and Whereas, engineering staff used a systems approach to evaluate intersection control; and Whereas, engineering staff recommend maintaining the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue as an all-way stop controlled intersection; and Whereas, Resolution No. 93-197 was rescinded by the St. Louis Park City Council as approved in Resolution No. 25-095; and Whereas, the geometry of this intersection is not changing, and staff are recommending reestablishing all-way stop signs, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the engineering director is authorized to: 1. Install all-way stop signs for the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 7 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-097 Authorize stop sign at the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue Whereas, Hennepin County is completing the reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25. The construction has changed several roadway configurations to better serve the surrounding community, including local businesses and residents; and Whereas, in response to these changes, city staff conducted a comprehensive review of existing traffic control to ensure alignment with current traffic patterns; and Whereas, the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive and Inglewood Avenue is now disconnected from eastbound County Road 25; and Whereas, engineering staff used a systems approach to evaluate intersection control; and Whereas, engineering staff recommend removing the stop signs for eastbound and westbound South MN 7 Service Drive at Inglewood Avenue; and Whereas, Resolution No. 93-197 was rescinded by the St. Louis Park City Council as approved in Resolution No. 25-095, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the engineering director is authorized to: 1. Install stop sign for northbound Inglewood Avenue at the intersection of South MN 7 Service Drive. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 8 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-098 Authorize stop signs at the intersection of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue Whereas, Hennepin County is completing the reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25. The construction has changed several roadway configurations to better serve the surrounding community, including local businesses and residents; and Whereas, in response to these changes, city staff conducted a comprehensive review of existing traffic control to ensure alignment with current traffic patterns; and Whereas, North MN 7 Service Drive east of Joppa Avenue has been permanently removed as part of the reconstruction; and Whereas, engineering staff used a systems approach to evaluate intersection control; and Whereas, engineering staff recommend removing the stop signs for westbound and southbound approaches of North MN 7 Service Drive and Joppa Avenue; and Whereas, the existing stop signs at the intersection were installed without formal resolutions authorizing their placement; and Whereas, this action will authorize their placement and establish right of way for the intersection, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the engineering director is authorized to: 1. Install stop sign for eastbound North MN 7 Service Drive at intersection of Joppa Avenue. 2. Install stop sign for southbound Joppa Avenue at westbound County Road 25. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Page 9 Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-099 Authorizing parking restrictions near the intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard at Glenhurst Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue Whereas, Hennepin County is completing the reconstruction of Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25. The construction has changed several roadway configurations to better serve the surrounding community, including local businesses and residents; and Whereas, in response to these changes, city staff conducted a comprehensive review of existing parking signage to ensure alignment with current traffic patterns; and Whereas, the project created a segment of Minnetonka Boulevard that is now under city jurisdiction; and Whereas, engineering staff used a systems approach to evaluate parking restrictions; and Whereas, engineering staff recommend restricting parking to improve traffic flow and accommodate turning vehicles, delivery trucks and winter maintenance equipment on the newly created segment of Minnetonka Boulevard, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the engineering director is authorized to: 1. Install “No Parking” signage at the intersection of Minnetonka Boulevard and Glenhurst Avenue. 2. Install “No Parking” signage on both sides of the local segment of Minnetonka Boulevard west of Huntington Avenue. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk !"$ !"$ !"$!"$ !"$ !"$ !"$ !"$ !"$ !"$ !"$ I N G L E W O O D A V E S 3 1 S T S T W S O U T H M N 7 S E R V I C E D R I V E N O R T H M N 7 S E R V I C E D R I V E J O P P A A V E S J O P P A A V E S C O U N T Y R O A D 2 5 C O U N T Y R O A D 2 5 M I N N E TO N K A B LV D ϯϬϰϯ ϯϬϰϲ ϯϬϱϬ ϰϬϱϭ ϯϬϱϵ ϰϭϰϭ ϰϯϬϭ ϰϯϭϬ ϯϬϰϬ ϯϭϬϬ ϰϮϮϭ ϰϬϰϬ ϰϯϬϭ ϰϭϬϭ ϰϮϬϭ ϰϯϭϱ ϮϵϱϬ Proposed Intersection Control: Inglewood and Joppa Aves at MN 7 Service Drive 0 200 400100 Feet Date: 9/26/2025 !"$Existing stop sign !"$Stop sign to be removed Removed road Existing roadway City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Page 10 Proposed parking prohibitions on Glenhurst Ave, Huntington Ave, and Minnetonka Blvd S O U T H M N 7 S E R V I C E D R H U N T I N G T O N A V E S G L E N H U R S T A V E C O U N T Y R O A D 2 5 M I N N E T O N K A B L V D M I N N E T O N K A B LV D C O U N T Y R O A D 2 5 0 100 20050 Feet´Date: 9/26/2025 Existing no parking Proposed no parking City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5h) Title: Resolutions authorizing traffic control and parking restrictions near Minnetonka Boulevard and County Road 25 - Ward 1 Page 11 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5i Executive summary Title: Approve city council travel for National League of Cities City Summit Conference in 2025 Recommended action: Motion to approve city council’s travel to the National League of Cities (NLC) City Summit conference in Salt Lake City, Utah, Nov. 19 through Nov. 22, 2025, for the purposes of strategic networking and professional development. Policy consideration: None. Summary: The administrative services department coordinates travel and costs associated with attending out-of-state organizational conferences. Organization conference attendance and associated costs are budgeted annually, and travel by elected officials is approved by the city council prior to travel when possible and appropriate as per Resolution No. 06-007. The 2025 NLC City Summit conference will be attended by Council Members Brausen, Baudhuin, Farris and Mayor Mohamed. The conference offers a full schedule of daily sessions where council members learn from qualified presenters and network with more than 2,000 fellow attendees. The conference features two and a half days of learning while connecting with fellow elected leaders and city officials from across the nation. Topics are focused on city government leadership education. Additional workshops and constituency group meetings provide attendees with opportunities to network with diverse representation from city governments. The total estimated costs for attendance at the 2025 NLC City Summit Conference is $10,420. Financial or budget considerations: Costs are included in the 2025 budget. Strategic priority consideration: All strategic priorities apply. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5j Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Minnesota Housing Local Housing Trust Fund grant award Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the acceptance a grant award from Minnesota Housing for the Local Housing Trust Fund (LHTF) to support the City of St. Louis Park’s local housing trust fund. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to authorize the acceptance of the grant award for eligible grant expenses to support the City of St. Louis Park’s LHTF? Summary: The community development department applied for and was awarded $150,000 through the Minnesota Housing LHTF grant to support programs such as rental assistance through the city’s LHTF. The grant funds will be available for 36 months; however, staff expect these dollars to be expended within 18 months. Financial or budget considerations: Any grant funding received will support serving more residents through programs funded by the city’s LHTF. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative and grants analyst Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5j) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Minnesota Housing Local Housing Trust Fund grant award Resolution No. 25 - ___ Authorizing acceptance of the Minnesota Housing Local Housing Trust Fund grant award Whereas, the city on behalf of its community development department may enter into a grant agreement with Minnesota Housing for the Local Housing Trust fund; and Whereas, the grant funds will be used to support programs, such as rental assistance, through the City of St. Louis Park’s local housing trust fund; and Whereas, the city has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration, Be it resolved by the city council (the “city council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota that Mayor Nadia Mohamed and City Manager Kim Keller, or successors, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements necessary to receive the grant and implement the project (the grant agreement) on behalf of the City of St. Louis Park and to be the fiscal agent and administer the grant. Reviewed for administration: ____________________________________ Kim Keller, city manager Attest: ____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: ____________________________________ Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5k Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program grant award Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing acceptance of the Great Lakes Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Grant Program award from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) through the Minneapolis Foundation. Policy consideration: Does the council wish to authorize acceptance of the Great Lakes Thriving Communities Grant Program award from the EPA through the Minneapolis Foundation? Summary: In March 2025, city staff applied for $50,000 in grant funding under the U.S. EPA Great Lakes Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Grant Program. (The Minneapolis Foundation was selected by the EPA to serve as a regional grant-maker for the program to remove barriers to federal funding). Staff intend to use the funds to develop and conduct a robust community survey to better understand environmental and public health issues in the Aquila and Texa-Tonka neighborhoods. Parts of these two neighborhoods face high surface temperatures, excessive pollution, and high energy burden due to aging housing stock. The neighborhoods also have a high percentage of residents who are black, indigenous and people of color (BIPOC), low- income and disabled. Staff aim to survey 10% of the population through a multilingual social media campaign, print media and at least eight in-person tabling events. Funds will compensate residents for their input, and the survey will help create a future neighborhood resiliency roadmap and inform the Climate Action Plan amendment. Although this grant is among those federal grants that were terminated in May 2025, the Minneapolis Foundation took action against the EPA to reestablish the grant program and now has access to the funds. Financial or budget considerations: Any grant funding received will assist with the project financial feasibility and offset the amount of city funding needed for the project. No match is required. Strategic priority considerations: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative and grants analyst Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5k) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Environmental Protection Agency Great Lakes Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program grant award Resolution No. 25 -___ Authorizing acceptance of a Minneapolis Foundation Great Lakes Thriving Communities Grant Program grant award Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “city”) on behalf of its building and energy department may enter into a grant agreement with the Minneapolis Foundation; and Whereas, the grant funds will be used to develop and conduct a robust community survey to better understand environmental and public health issues in neighborhoods within the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the city has the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration, Be it resolved by the city council (the “city council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota that Mayor Nadia Mohamed and City Manager Kim Keller, or successors, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements necessary to receive the grant and implement the project (the grant agreement) on behalf of the city of St. Louis Park and to be the fiscal agent and administer the grant. Reviewed for administration: ____________________________________ Kim Keller, city manager Attest: ____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: ____________________________________ Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5l Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Hennepin County IGNITE funding award Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing acceptance of the award from the Hennepin County IGNITE Community Climate Mitigation Fund. Policy consideration: Does the council wish to authorize acceptance of the funding award from the Hennepin County IGNITE Community Climate Mitigation Fund? Summary: The City of St. Louis Park was recently awarded $30,000 to electrify outdoor landscaping equipment through Hennepin County’s new IGNITE Community Climate Mitigation Fund. Sustainability division staff considered a variety of projects to apply for, keeping in mind the county’s goal to select a project that would directly reduce greenhouse gas emissions. With the funding, parks and recreation staff will procure one electric lawn mower, two electric leaf blowers, two electric chainsaws and one concrete saw: all of which will replace gasoline- powered equipment. Staff calculated that this switch avoids two metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions annually. All equipment will be procured by the end of calendar year 2025 per the county’s funding requirements. Financial or budget considerations: All funding received will assist with the project financial feasibility and offset the amount of city funds needed for the project. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Clancy Ferris, legislative & grants analyst Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5l) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing acceptance of the Hennepin County IGNITE funding award Resolution No. 25 - ___ Authorizing acceptance of the Hennepin County IGNITE funding award Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “city”) on behalf of its building and energy department may enter into a professional services agreement with Hennepin County; and Whereas, the funds will be used to procure electric landscaping equipment in place of gasoline-powered equipment in the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the city has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure adequate project administration, Be it resolved by the city council (the “city council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota that Mayor Nadia Mohamed and City Manager Kim Keller, or successors, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements necessary to receive the funds and implement the project (the agreement) on behalf of the City of St. Louis Park and to be the fiscal agent and administer the funding. Reviewed for administration: ____________________________________ Kim Keller, city manager Attest: ____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: ____________________________________ Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5m Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for repair of sewer service line at 3308 Idaho Avenue South - Ward 3 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3308 Idaho Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 17-117-21-13-0094 Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with a policy previously established by the city council. Summary: Daniel Cole and Maren Sundby, owners of the single-family residence at 3308 Idaho Ave S, have requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy. The city requires the repair of service lines to promote public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put into place because property owners may face financial hardship when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted and approved by city staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $11,880. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Beth Holida, office assistant Reviewed by: Austin Holm, utilities superintendent Stacy Voelker, administrative coordinator Emily Carr, assessing technician Jay Hall, public works director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5m) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for repair of sewer service line at 3308 Idaho Avenue South - Ward 3 Resolution No. 25-____ Authorizing a special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3308 Idaho Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 17-117-21-13-0094 Whereas, the property owners at 3308 Idaho Avenue South, have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single-family residence located at 3308 Idaho Avenue South; and Whereas, the property owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the utility superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. A petition from the property owners requesting approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $11,880. 4. The property owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution or common law. 5. The property owners have agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten year period at the interest rate of 6%. 6. The property owners have executed an agreement with the city and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5n Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 2813 Georgia Avenue South - Ward 1 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 2813 Georgia Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 08-117-21-44-0081. Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the city council. Summary: Allison Koeckeritz, owner of the single-family residence at 2813 Georgia Avenue South, has requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy. The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted and approved by city staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $12,650. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Beth Holida, office assistant Reviewed by: Austin Holm, utilities superintendent Emily Carr, assessing technician Stacy Voelker, administrative coordinator Jay Hall, public works director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5n) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 2813 Georgia Avenue South - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-____ Authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 2813 Georgia Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 08-117-21-44-0081 Whereas, the property owner at 2813 Georgia Avenue South, has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single-family residence located at 2813 Georgia Avenue South; and Whereas, the property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the property owner requesting approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $12,650. 4. The property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The property owner has agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten year period at the interest rate of 6%. 6. The property owner has executed an agreement with the city and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5o Executive Summary Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South - Ward 1 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 16-117-21-24-0074. Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the city council. Summary: Justin Hamilton, owner of the single-family residence at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South, has requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for his home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy. The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this is unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by city staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $5,600.00. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Beth Holida, office assistant Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessing technician Austin Holm, utilities superintendent Jay Hall, public works director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5o) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South - Ward 1 Resolution No. 25-____ Authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 16-117-21-24-0074 Whereas, the property owner at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South, has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family residence located at 3332 Xenwood Avenue South; and Whereas, the property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line, Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the property owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $5,600.00. 4. The property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The property owner has agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 6%. 6. The property owner has executed an agreement with the city and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Consent agenda item: 5p Executive summary Title: Resolution approving West End alternative urban areawide review update - Ward 4 Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution approving the final alternative urban areawide review (AUAR) update for the West End redevelopment project located in the southwest corner of Highways 394 and 100. Policy consideration: Does the city council accept the final AUAR update for the West End redevelopment project? Summary: The city council adopted an environmental analysis for the West End in 2007. The type of analysis used was an alternative urban areawide review (AUAR). The council also approved formal updates in 2013, 2018 and 2023. Hempel Real Estate, the owner of The Shops at West End, is considering adding over 60,000 square feet of office space at 1682 West End Blvd. The possibility of a new multi-story office use exceeded what had previously been studied in the AUAR and necessitated this update. The draft AUAR update was distributed to required jurisdictions on Aug. 14, 2025, posted on the city website, and published in the EQB Monitor on Aug. 19, 2025. The notice of availability appeared in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on Aug. 21, 2025. The formal comment period closed at 4:00 p.m. on Sept. 3, 2025. The city hired Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to complete the AUAR update; their report is attached for review. The report focuses on three issues that were identified as potential limiting factors for development under the original AUAR, including sanitary sewer use, water use and traffic. The analysis used the latest information on existing conditions and planned development. The AUAR analysis determined that sanitary sewer capacity and water use are no longer a limiting factor for the development. The traffic analysis completed for this AUAR update did not identify any new traffic mitigation measures. Remaining recommended mitigation measures should be coordinated with Minnesota Department of Transportation. No state agencies, Metropolitan Council or local agencies objected to the AUAR update. The comments we received were technical in nature and are addressed in the attached final AUAR update. The letters from the Metropolitan Council and Minnesota Department of Transportation and the responses to each can be found in Appendix A of the AUAR update. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable. The City of St. Louis Park collected an escrow from Hempel Real Estate, who requested the update, to fund the AUAR study. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Resolution, final AUAR update Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 5p) Page 2 Title: Resolution approving West End alternative urban areawide review update - Ward 4 Resolution No. 25-____ Adopting the final alternative urban areawide review (AUAR) update for the West End redevelopment project located in the southwest corner of Highways 394 and 100 Whereas, redevelopment continues of approximately 35 acres of land located in the southwest corner of Highways 394 and 100; and Whereas, an environmental review is required by state law, and Whereas, an AUAR was completed for the property in 2007 and formally updated in 2013, 2018 and 2023, and Whereas, Hempel Real Estate, the property owner of 1682 West End Blvd., proposes adding over 60,000 square feet of multi-story office to the property, which exceeded what was previously studied in the AUAR, necessitating an update to the AUAR, and Whereas, a public and agency comment period was provided and comments were addressed in accordance with the environmental review process and requirements, and Whereas, a mitigation plan addressing environmental impacts has been reviewed and updated, Now therefore be it resolved, that the City of St. Louis Park hereby adopts the final AUAR update and mitigation plan for the West End redevelopment project located in the southwest quadrant of Highways 394 and 100. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Public hearing: 6a Executive summary Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. There is no other formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the city council agenda for Oct. 20, 2025. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the Special Service Districts 1 – 6 budgets and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2026 proposed budgets and service charges have been adjusted to include a 2.45% increase in all Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 with the exception of district 6, where the budget will remain flat while service charges increase by 2.45%. Staff have provided public notice and direct mailing to property owners in each district regarding the proposed 2026 budget and service charges. In addition, SSD 4 multi-year service charge was for ten years and expires at the end of 2025. Petitions to extend the multi-year service charge for ten years through 2035 have been signed by at least twenty-five percent (25%) of property owners, as required by law. The proposed 2026 budget, services charges and locations of each district are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: The city owns property in several SSDs and will incur service charge costs for those properties. The service charge costs incurred are as follows: parks maintenance budget incurs $31,482 in SSD 1; public works operations budget incurs $58 in SSD 2 and $872 in SSD 4; EDA/TIF admin budget incurs $1,814 in SSD 6. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Attachments A) SSD 1 – 6 proposed budgets 2026 B) SSD 1 – 6 proposed service charges 2026 C) SSD 1 – 6 streetscape maps Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Page 2 Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Discussion Background: History In 1996, the city council approved a resolution authorizing SSD 1. Since then, five additional service districts have been set up within the city (SSDs 1-4 are along Excelsior Boulevard, SSD 5 is along Park Place Boulevard near West End and SSD 6 is along W. 36th Street near Hoiggard Village). City staff provide management services for the service districts. Budget and service charge overview Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The service charges are used to fund the maintenance activities in each district. The notice of this public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 18 and Oct. 2, 2025. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within each district. SSD 4 multi-year service charge was for ten years expiring in 2025. Service district members have shown interest in extending the District beyond 2025. Staff sent a petition to each property owner to approve service charges commencing 2026 through and including 2035. As required by law, the city has received signed petitions from the owners of at least twenty-five percent (25%) of the properties subject to the proposed service charge. A summary of proposed 2026 budget and service charges are below: • SSD 1: budget and service charges proposed at $117,196; an increase of 2.45% • SSD 2: budget and service charges proposed at $52,137; an increase of 2.45% • SSD 3: budget and service charges proposed at $56,686; an increase of 2.45% • SSD 4: budget and service charges proposed at $29,591; an increase of 2.45% • SSD 5: budget and service charges proposed at $35,126; an increase of 2.45% • SSD 6: budget proposed at $27,400 (remains flat) and service charges proposed at $19,793; an increase of 2.45% Proposed 2026 budget and service charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following: • 2026 budget and service charges for each district • In SSD 1: An annual contribution of $1,993 from Parkshore Senior Campus, LLC, in recognition of benefits received as a residential property located in the service district Present considerations: The Special Service Districts are a benefit to the businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: • On Oct.20, 2025, the city council will be asked to adopt individual resolutions for each district setting the 2026 budgets and service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. • In November 2025, the city certifies the 2026 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. Attachment A City of St. Louis Park 2026 Budgets proposed for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Account Code Account Name 2026 Budget Proposed 2025 Budget Actual 5305-000 Consulting Fees & Fees For Services $ 102,654 $ 99,896 5329-000 Postage, Delivery, Publishing $ 107 $ 107 5331-000 Electric Utility $ 2,520 $ 2,520 5401-000 Admin/Office Supplies & Materials $ 255 $ 255 5402-000 Operations Supplies & Materials $ 6,863 $ 6,863 5520-000 Building Acquisition & Building Construction $ 4,612 $ 4,611 5911-071 Internal Service Fund Charge - Property Causality Fund $ 185 $ 145 Total $ 117,196 $ 114,398 Account Code Account Name 2026 Budget Proposed 2025 Budget Actual 5305-000 Consulting Fees & Fees For Services $ 43,698 $ 42,570 5329-000 Postage, Delivery, Publishing $ 100 5331-000 Electric Utility $ 2,467 $ 2,467 5401-000 Admin/Office Supplies & Materials $ 218 $ 218 5402-000 Operations Supplies & Materials $ 3,431 3,432$ 5520-000 Building Acquisition & Building Construction $ 2,144 $ 2,145 5911-071 Internal Service Fund Charge - Property Causality Fund $ 79 $ 61 Total $ 52,137 $ 50,892 Account Code Account Name 2026 Budget Proposed 2025 Budget Actual 5305-000 Consulting Fees & Fees For Services $ 47,454 $ 46,221 5329-000 Postage, Delivery, Publishing $ 100 $ - 5331-000 Electric Utility $ 1,180 $ 1,180 5401-000 Admin/Office Supplies & Materials $ 461 $ 461 5402-000 Operations Supplies & Materials $ 3,967 $ 3,968 5520-000 Building Acquisition & Building Construction $ 3,432 $ 3,432 5911-071 Internal Service Fund Charge - Property Causality Fund $ 92 $ 71 Total $ 56,686 $ 55,333 Special Service District #1 Special Service District #2 Special Service District #3 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 3 Attachment A Account Code Account Name 2026 Budget Proposed 2025 Budget Actual $ $ $ 26,460 $ $ - $ $ $ 1,575 $ $ $ 233 $ $ $ 4,410 $ $ $ 1,575 5305-000 Consulting Fees & Fees For Services 5329-000 Postage, Delivery, Publishing 5331-000 Electric Utility 5401-000 Admin/Office Supplies & Materials 5402-000 Operations Supplies & Materials 5520-000 Building Acquisition & Building Construction 5911-071 Internal Service Fund Charge - Property Causality Fund $34 Total $ $ 2 189 $ 10 $ 575 $ 23 $ 410 $ 575 $ 4 $ 3 126 $ $ 34,287 Account Code Account Name 2026 Budget Proposed 2025 Budget Actual $ $ $ 16,500 $ $ $ 150 $ $ $ 1,000 $ $ $ 217 $ $ $ 5,500 $ $ $ 4,000 5305-000 Consulting Fees & Fees For Services 5329-000 Postage, Delivery, Publishing 5331-000 Electric Utility 5401-000 Admin/Office Supplies & Materials 5402-000 Operations Supplies & Materials 5520-000 Building Acquisition & Building Construction 5911-071 Internal Service Fund Charge - Property Causality Fund $33 Total $ $ 1 500 $ 15 $ 000 $ 21 $ 500 $ 000 $ 4 $ 2 400 $ $ 27,400 Special Service District #6 Special Service District #5 $ 2,360 $ 2,359 $ 2,466 $ 2,467 5402-000 Operations Supplies & Materials 5520-000 Building Acquisition & Building Construction 5911-071 Internal Service Fund Charge - Property Causality Fund $ 45 $ 35 Total $ 29,591 $ 28,885 City of St. Louis Park 2026 Budgets proposed for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 (continued) Account Code Account Name 2026 Budget Proposed 2025 Budget Actual $ $ $ 21,180 $ $ $ 107 $ $ $ 2,574 5305-000 Consulting Fees & Fees For Services 5329-000 Postage, Delivery, Publishing 5331-000 Electric Utility 5401-000 Admin/Office Supplies & Materials $ $ 2 877 $ 10 $ 574 $ 16 $ $ 162 Special Service District #4 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 4 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #1 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2026 Service Charges PROPOSED ACTUAL 2026 2025 LINE PID SERVICE SERVICE NO.NO.OWNER BUSINESS CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-33-0019 3601 Park Center Boulevard Bel Verge LLC Bel Verge LLC $3,955 $3,897 2 06-028-24-33-0015 3601 State Hwy No 100 South Target Corporation T-0260 Target Corporation $12,514 $12,278 3 06-028-24-34-0022 3700 Monterey Drive City of St. Louis Park City of St. Louis Park $31,482 $30,537 4 06-028-24-33-0014 3777 Park Center Boulevard Bermer Corp Lund Food Holdings $12,891 $12,601 6 07-028-24-22-0031 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $8,758 $8,428 7 07-028-24-22-0035 3900 Park Nicollet Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $6,728 $6,562 8 07-028-24-21-0004 4916 Excelsior Boulevard Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Health Services $1,934 $1,918 9 07-028-24-21-0005 4920 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Medical Center Park Nicollet Health Services $567 $556 10 07-028-24-21-0006 4950 Excelsior Boulevard Healthpartners R/E PMNC Holdings $649 $641 11 07-028-24-21-0512 4951 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $1,763 $1,736 12 07-028-24-21-0513 4959 Excelsior Boulevard 4959 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $1,585 $1,543 13 07-028-24-22-0023 4961 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $733 $717 14 07-028-24-22-0024 4995 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $977 $953 15 07-028-24-22-0032 5000 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $690 $679 16 07-028-24-22-0025 5001 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $693 $678 17 07-028-24-22-0033 5050 Excelsior Boulevard Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Health Services $4,106 $4,010 18 07-028-24-22-0034 5100 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $1,768 $1,720 19 07-028-24-22-0037 5200 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Place Ltd Liability Co.Frauenshuh Co.$1,950 $1,918 20 07-028-24-22-0026 5201 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $10,031 $9,836 21 07-028-24-22-0036 5300 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Place LTD Liability Co Frauenshuh Co.$7,050 $6,930 22 07-028-24-22-0004 5400 Auto Club Way AAA AAA Minneapolis $6,373 $6,261 Service charge total $117,196 $114,398 Notes: 1)The proposed 2026 service charges total is $117,196. 2)The proposed 2026 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. ADDRESS City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 5 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #2 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2026 Service Charges PROPOSED ACTUAL 2026 2025 LINE SERVICE SERVICE NO.PID NO.OWNER Business name CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-41-0075 3900 Excelsior Blvd MFREVF III- Ellipse LLC MFREVF III - Ellipse LLC $8,400 $8,141 2 06-028-24-41-0077 3901 Excelsior Blvd Alberto Properties LLP Alberto Properties LLP $2,482 $2,405 3 06-028-24-41-0076 3924 Excelsior Blvd MFREVF III - Ellipse, LLC MFREVF III - Ellipse LLC $3,019 $2,926 4 06-028-24-41-0068 3925 Excelsior Blvd Patricia Fitzgerald A & A Agency Inc $973 $943 6 06-028-24-41-0067 3929 Excelsior Blvd City of St Louis Park City of St Louis Park $58 $56 7 06-028-24-41-0014 3939 Excelsior Blvd Sara Son LLC Sara Son LLC $1,413 $1,369 8 06-028-24-41-0070 3947 Excelsior Blvd Wallack Properties LLC Wallack Properties LLC $2,375 $2,302 9 06-028-24-41-0008 4100 Excelsior Blvd KB Holding Company LLC KB Holding Company LLC $1,720 $1,667 10 06-028-24-41-0009 4120 Excelsior Blvd Altus Business Development Properties Altus Business Development Properties $1,681 $1,629 11 06-028-24-44-0001 4140 Excelsior Blvd Ridgecrest St. Louis Park I LLC Tiera Encantada $2,908 $2,818 12 06-028-24-44-0176 4170 Excelsior Blvd 4150 Excelsior Blvd Partnership Rack Attack $2,209 $2,141 13 06-028-24-44-0175 4200 Excelsior Blvd Stranik Real Estate LLC DBA Midas St. Paul $1,881 $1,823 14 06-028-24-44-0173 4201 Excelsior Blvd AMF Properties LLC AMF Properties LLC/Life Medical $2,823 $2,736 15 06-028-24-44-0088 4221 Excelsior Blvd Prima Investments LLC Prima Investments LLC $397 $385 16 06-028-24-43-0017 4300 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $824 $799 17 06-028-24-43-0020 4301 Excelsior Blvd S & S Investments S & S Investments $1,736 $1,682 18 06-028-24-43-0018 4306 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $632 $612 19 06-028-24-43-0019 4308 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $842 $816 20 06-028-24-43-0021 4317 Excelsior Blvd 4317 Holdings LLC DWELL44 $1,048 $1,016 21 06-028-24-43-0186 4320 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $2,588 $2,509 22 06-028-24-43-0091 4331 Excelsior Blvd Johnson0503 LLC Bell Nelson Furniture $1,426 $1,382 23 06-028-24-43-0392 4400 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bank Bridgewater Bank $764 $5,774 24 06-028-24-43-0040 4409 Excelsior Blvd Samfar Real Estate Inc Samfar Real Estate Inc $993 $963 25 06-028-24-43-0041 4415 Excelsior Blvd Automotive Accessories LLC Automotive Accessories LLC $819 $794 26 06-028-24-43-0042 4419 Excelsior Blvd Celine Properties LLC Celine Properties LLC $1,804 $1,748 27 06-028-24-43-0391 4450 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bank Bridgewater Bank $6,322 $1,456 Service charge total $52,137 $50,892 Notes: 1)The proposed 2026 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. 2)All services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. ADDRESS City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 6 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #3 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2026 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2026 2025 LINE NO.PID No.Address Business Owner Service Charge Service Charge 1 06-028-24-43-0191 4500 Exc Blvd CS McCrossan Inc Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $4,827 $4,743 2 07-028-24-12-0047 4501 Exc Blvd S & D Cleaners Laurel Properties LLC $1,316 $1,280 3 07-028-24-12-0048 4509 Exc Blvd Lang Nelson Office Park Boulevard LLP $2,341 $2,277 4 06-028-24-43-0192 4590 Exc Blvd CS McCrossan Inc Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $991 $974 6 07-028-24-12-0049 4601 Exc Blvd Park Blvd Office Bldg Park Boulevard LLP $3,264 $3,185 7 07-028-24-12-0050 4611 Exc Blvd Dilly Lilly 4611 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,574 $1,536 8 07-028-24-12-0051 4615 Exc Blvd Judith McGrann & Friends Pie in the Sky Properties, LLC $1,357 $1,325 9 07-028-24-12-0052 4617 Exc Blvd Flower Fair 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,770 $1,728 10 07-028-24-12-0175 4630 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand Apts LLC $8,057 $7,856 11 07-028-24-21-0009 4631 Exc Blvd F45 Training 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,804 $1,762 12 07-028-24-21-0011 4701 Exc Blvd Steve's Park Amoco Mason Properties LLC $2,920 $2,839 13 07-028-24-21-0012 4725 Exc Blvd Excelsior Office Bldg Excelsior Investments LLC $3,794 $3,697 14 07-028-24-21-0256 4730 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand Apts LLC $9,401 $9,168 15 07-028-24-21-0514 4800 Exc Blvd Fresh Thyme Grocery 4800 Excelsior Apts $5,562 $5,448 16 07-028-24-21-0252 4801 Exc Blvd Loffhagen Insurance Bird Dog Properties LLC $1,789 $1,747 17 07-028-24-21-0015 4811 Exc Blvd Latitudes/Laundramat Fine Brothers $1,634 $1,591 18 07-028-24-21-0016 4821 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Properties LLC $885 $864 19 07-028-24-21-0017 4825 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Properties LLC $882 $861 20 07-028-24-21-0031 4901 Exc Blvd Margolis Law Firm DMM Holdings $921 $897 21 07-028-24-21-0032 4907 Exc Blvd Allstate 4907 Excelsior LLC $800 $778 22 07-028-24-21-0033 4911 Exc Blvd Sherwin-Williams MKT Property LLC $797 $777 Service charge total $56,686 $55,333 Notes: 1)The proposed 2026 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 7 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #4 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2026 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2026 2025 PAR Service Service NO.PID #Owner Business Charge Charge 1 21-117-21-24-0019 5600 Excelsior Blvd Coco Investments Finished Basement Company $1,107 $1,080 2 21-117-21-24-0202 5608 Excelsior Blvd Helmut Mauer Auto Surf Café $839 $819 3 21-117-21-24-0141 5707 Excelsior Blvd Len Paul/Gene Pretty Good LLC c/o New Concepts Management Group New Concepts Mgt Group $1,126 $1,099 4 21-117-21-24-0193 5717 Excelsior Blvd K4 LLC K4 LLC $973 $950 5 21-117-21-24-0040 5720 Excelsior Blvd Holiday Stationstores Inc Holiday Stationstores, Inc.$1,214 $1,186 6 21-117-21-24-0161 5801 Excelsior Blvd Premier RE, LLC Premier RE LLC $560 $546 7 21-117-21-24-0066 5804 Excelsior Blvd Lelich Properties LLC Lelich Properties LLC $688 $671 8 21-117-21-24-0210 5809 Excelsior Blvd C.B.S. Real Est Ptnr II LLP C B S Real Est Ptrn II LLP $550 $537 9 21-117-21-24-0067 5810 Excelsior Blvd 5812 Excelsior Blvd Co LLC 5812 Excelsior Blvd Co LLC $789 $770 11 21-117-21-24-0185 5825 Excelsior Blvd Reinhart Real Estate LLC Reinhart Real Estate LLC $1,448 $1,414 12 21-117-21-24-0083 5900 Excelsior Blvd Realty Income Properties3, LLC Realty Income Props 3 LLC $983 $959 13 21-117-21-23-0156 5916 Excelsior Blvd Rackner & Rackner Rackner and Rackner/Bunny's $1,099 $1,072 14 21-117-21-23-0010 5922 Excelsior Blvd 5922 Building LLC Frederick & Rosen Ltd $202 $197 15 21-117-21-24-0195 5925 Excelsior Blvd DYS Properties Suntide Commercial Realty $1,501 $1,466 16 21-117-21-23-0011 5930 Excelsior Blvd Leonard C Riley Trust Northern Aire Pools $378 $369 17 21-117-21-23-0097 6001 Excelsior Blvd Sew What Corporation The Wicker Shop $535 $522 18 21-117-21-23-0127 6002 Excelsior Blvd Seneca Holdings LLC Fitrz Inc $603 $589 19 21-117-21-23-0128 6006 Excelsior Blvd Four Four Time LLC RRK LLC $310 $303 20 21-117-21-23-0100 6011 Excelsior Blvd Kathleen Hames Arts & Flowers $1,187 $1,159 21 21-117-21-23-0155 6100 Excelsior Blvd Lion Properties LLC ReMAXX/King Tooth $418 $408 22 21-117-21-32-0006 6111 Excelsior Blvd Excelsior 6111, LLC 6111 Excelsior LLC $1,143 $1,116 23 21-117-21-23-0130 6112 Excelsior Blvd Snyder Electric Co.Snyder Electric Co $624 $609 24 21-117-21-32-0021 6121 Excelsior Blvd Flannery Lucey Props I LLC Secured Retirement $670 $654 25 21-117-21-32-0022 6127 Excelsior Blvd TRW Capital Management Inc White Family Dentistry $451 $441 26 6200 6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd (individual charges shown below)$3,170 $3,095 27 20-117-21-14-0026 6500 Excelsior Blvd Park Nicollet Health Services/Methodist Hospital Asbury Methodist Hospital $2,188 $2,135 28 20-117-21-41-0009 6600 Excelsior Blvd Park Nicollet Health Services/Methodist Hospital Methodist Hospital $3,963 $3,868 29 City Municipal Parking Lot City of St. Louis Park $872 $851 Service charge total $29,591 $28,885 Address City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 8 Attachment B **6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd Charges 2026 2025 21-117-21-32-0133 6200 Excelsior Blvd 101 TRW Capital Management Inc.Ward Law Offices LTD $185 $180 21-117-21-32-0134 6200 Excelsior Blvd 102 Charles and Janice Woodson Farmers Insurance Group $193 $188 21-117-21-32-0135 6200 Excelsior Blvd 103 KUN LI RE 1 LLC Midwest Construction $186 $182 21-117-21-32-0136 6200 Excelsior Blvd 104 DAFI Properties LLC American Family Insurance $210 $205 21-117-21-32-0137 6200 Excelsior Blvd 201 Dennis Schlutter Chiropractic Center $178 $174 21-117-21-32-0138 6200 Excelsior Blvd 202 Lois Cochrane Schlutter No separate office for this one $188 $184 21-117-21-32-0139 6200 Excelsior Blvd 203 Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC $245 $240 21-117-21-32-0140 6200 Excelsior Blvd 204 Lois Cochrane Schlutter Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC $217 $212 21-117-21-32-0141 6250 Excelsior Blvd 101 6250 Excelsior Blvd 101 LLC Alex Trevino Law PLLC $198 $193 21-117-21-32-0142 6250 Excelsior Blvd 102 BZ Holdings LLC LGH Properties LLC $183 $179 21-117-21-32-0143 6250 Excelsior Blvd 103 Impact Massage & Bodywork LLC E. Gordon Hoar & Associates $201 $196 21-117-21-32-0144 6250 Excelsior Blvd 104 RDK Holdings LLC Nemer Fieger & Associates $182 $177 21-117-21-32-0145 6250 Excelsior Blvd 201 James D Fieger Trustee Nemer Fieger & Associates $193 $188 21-117-21-32-0146 6250 Excelsior Blvd 202 Willy Skadsberg JR Skads Travel Service, Inc.$175 $171 21-117-21-32-0147 6250 Excelsior Blvd 203 James D Fieger Trustee Nemer Fieger & Associates $254 $249 21-117-21-32-0148 6250 Excelsior Blvd 204 Excelsior Blvd Office LLC Urista Properties LLC $182 $177 Subtotal $3,170 $3,095 Notes **Denotes properties with a single street address but have sub-units that are independently owned. 1)The proposed 2026 service charge for the district is $29,591. 2)The proposed 2026 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 9 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #5 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2026 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2026 2025 PID Address Owner Business Service Charge Service Charge 04-117-21-31-0019 1500 Park Place Blvd MLCV STLP LLC Doubletree Hotel $6,030 $6,007 30-029-24-33-0031 1600 West End Blvd Teresa LLC West End One $5,956 $5,935 04-117-21-34-0046 1620 Park Place Blvd PK Investment Associates LLC Roti & Leeann Chin $1,369 $1,364 04-117-21-34-0045 1650 Park Place Blvd PK Investment Associates LLC Inland Commerical $1,613 $1,607 04-117-21-34-0044 1690 Park Place Blvd Roselk LLC Arby's $1,213 $1,209 04-117-21-34-0049 1700 Park Place Blvd Costco Wholesale Corporation Fueling Station only $1,073 $1,070 30-029-24-32-0022 5320 16th St W MSP West End LLC ARC WEMPSMN001 LLC $2,403 $2,395 30-029-24-32-0026 5353 Wayzata Blvd MV Exchange & MV Exchange II LLC Park National Bank $2,476 $2,467 30-029-24-33-0011 5401 Gamble Dr BOF II MN W END OFF PK LLC Parkdale I - MEPC $4,328 $4,313 30-029-24-33-0015 5402 Parkdale Dr BOF II MN W END OFF PK LLC Parkdale II - MEPC $1,462 $1,457 04-117-21-34-0043 5600 Cedar Lake Rd PK Investment Associates LLC Office/Copy Max & Petsmart $2,786 $2,777 04-117-21-34-0050 5601 16th St W PK Investment Associates LLC Stormwater Pond $1,044 $1,041 04-117-21-31-0018 5657 Wayzata Blvd KK Corporation Park Place Restaurants $1,285 $1,281 04-117-21-34-0058 5799 16th St W PK Investment Associates LLC Punch Pizza $860 $1,366 04-117-21-34-0059 5699 16th St W PK Investment Associates LLC Five Guys $1,228 n/a Service charge total $35,126 $34,287 Notes: 1)The proposed 2026 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. 2)An additional parcel is noted in the proposed 2026 due to a parcel division. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 10 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #6 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2026 Service Charges LINE Proposed Actual NO.2026 2025 PID Address Owner Business Service Charge Service Charge 1 16-117-21-34-0607 3601 Wooddale Ave Woodale Catered Lvg TowerLight Senior Living $3,422 $3,344 2 16-117-21-34-0015 5500 36th St. W.SLMB LLC SLMB LLC $440 $429 3 16-117-21-34-0355 5600 36th St W SLP Harmony Marketplace LLC SLP HARMONY MARKETPLACE LLC KAMI Inc $3,206 $3,129 4 16-117-21-34-0611 5605 36th St W 36th Street LLC 36th Street LLC $3,050 $2,977 6 16-117-21-34-0072 5701 36th St W Shirley Okrent Lerner Trust The Oliver Press $1,145 $1,118 7 16-117-21-34-0040 5708 36th St W Standal Properties Inc Standal Properties Inc.$1,814 $1,770 8 16-117-21-34-0071 5718 36th St W Shirley Okrent Lerner Trust The Oliver Press $605 $590 9 16-117-21-34-0077 5721 36th St W J Evan Properties LLC Thermetic Products $1,273 $1,243 10 16-117-21-34-0038 5724 36th St W 5724 West 36th Street LLC 5724 West 36th St LLC $605 $590 11 16-117-21-34-0046 5727 36th St W R & SA Investment LLC R & SA Investment LLC $605 $590 12 16-117-21-34-0068 5802 36th St W Standal Properties Inc Standal Properties Inc.$1,814 $1,770 13 16-117-21-34-0610 5950 36th St W City of St. Louis Park City of St Louis Park EDA $1,814 $1,770 Service charge total $19,793 $19,320 Notes: 1)The proposed 2026 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 11 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 12 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 13 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 14 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 15 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 16 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2026 budget and service charges for Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 6 and extension of SSD 4 through 2035 Page 17 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Public hearing: 6b Executive summary Title: First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members Recommended action: • Mayor to open the public hearing, take public testimony and close the public hearing. • Motion to approve first reading of ordinance amending salaries for the mayor and council members and to set the second reading for Oct. 20, 2025. Policy consideration: Does the city council want to adjust the annual salaries for the mayor and council members beginning in 2026 above the increase set by the previous ordinance adopted in 2015? Summary: Minnesota Statute 415.11 states that the council sets its salary in such amount that it deems reasonable. St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Section 2.07 provides that the council shall set and may increase or decrease the salaries of the mayor and council members by ordinance. Any increases in salaries must be adopted before the next regular municipal election but cannot take effect until after the election. In October 2015, the city council adopted Ordinance No. 2480-15 and Resolution No. 15-153 to automatically adjust mayor, council and Economic Development Authority (EDA) commissioner salaries after each regular municipal election. The current annual salary for the mayor and council members is $20,842 and $14,413 respectively. This is a cumulative amount reflecting compensation for their roles as members of the council and the Economic Development Authority (EDA). Following discussions on July 7 and Aug. 18, 2025, the city council directed staff to prepare one- time amendments to the existing ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members. The proposed amendments would increase the cumulative annual salaries for the mayor and council members to $23,500 and $18,000 respectively. The ordinance amendment requires a public hearing and two readings by the city council. Salaries were previously set by both ordinance and resolution for each role because they were paid from different funds. Because that is no longer applicable and salaries are paid entirely by the general fund, going forward salaries for the mayor and council will be set exclusively by ordinance. Financial or budget considerations: This ordinance will increase mayor and council member compensation by 13% and 25% respectively on a one-time basis. This ordinance will increase costs by $25,000 in 2026 and is included in the preliminary budget. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Proposed ordinance, July 7, 2025 study session staff report (beginning p. 91), July 7, 2025 study session minutes, August 18, 2025 study session staff report (beginning p. 40), Racial equity and inclusion impact analysis summary Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk; Rita Vorpahl, HR director Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director; Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6b) Page 2 Title: First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members Discussion Who has the authority to set the salary of the mayor and council members? Minnesota Statute 415.11 states that the council can set its own salary in such amount that it deems reasonable. Any increases in salaries must be adopted before the next regular municipal election but cannot take effect until after the election. St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Section 2.07 provides that the council shall set and may increase or decrease the salaries of the mayor and council members by ordinance. When was the last salary adjustment for the mayor and council members? In October 2015, the city council adopted Ordinance No. 2480-15 and Resolution No. 15-153 to automatically adjust mayor, council and EDA commissioner salaries after each regular municipal election. Adjustments have subsequently occurred after each regular municipal election according to the schedule and formula outlined in the ordinance and resolution. What is the current salary for the mayor and council members? The current annual salary for the mayor is $20,842, broken down as follows: • Mayor salary = $15,194 • EDA commissioner = $5,648 The current annual salary for a council member is $14,413, broken down as follows: • Council member salary = $8,765 • EDA commissioner = $5,648 What is the proposed annual salary for the mayor and council members? The proposed annual salary for the mayor is $23,500, broken down as follows: • Mayor salary = $17,155 • EDA commissioner = $6,345 The proposed annual salary for a council member is $18,000, broken down as follows: • Council member salary = $10,980 • EDA commissioner = $7,020 When would the proposed changes take effect? The proposed amendments are required to be adopted before the next municipal election. However, the effective date of the amendments will be Jan. 1, 2026. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6b) Page 3 Title: First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members Ordinance No. _________ - 25 Setting salaries for the mayor and council members The city council of St. Louis Park ordains: Section 1. Ordinance No. 2480-15, adopted on October 19, 2015, is hereby amended as follows to delete the struck-out language and to add the underlined text: Effective for officials elected to serve for the 2016 2026 calendar year, the annual salary of the mayor shall be $12, 091 $23,500 and the annual salary of each council member shall be $6, 977 $18,000. Effective in 2018 2028 and thereafter for calendar years after each succeeding municipal election, the salaries of the mayor and council members shall be adjusted in an amount equal to the cumulative adjustments for non-organized city employees since the last adjustment in the mayor and council member’s salaries. For mayor and council members who serve for less than a full year, the annual salary shall be pro-rated. Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2026, following passage and publication by law. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 20, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading October 6, 2025 Second reading October 20, 2025 Date of publication October 30, 2025 Date ordinance takes effect January 1, 2026 Racial equity and inclusion impact analysis: city council salary increase Introduction On August 18, 2025, the St. Louis Park City Council convened during a study session to participate in a racial equity and inclusion impact analysis (REIIA). The goal of this session was to identify the potential racial equity and inclusion impacts of an increase in the salaries of the mayor and council members. In summary, there are two highlighted topics that came up during the discussion; 1) fair compensation for council work and 2) increase diversity and representation on the city council. During the study session discussion and this summary analysis, there was no direct budgetary action taken to establish fair compensation or decide on a council salary increase. The discussion and summary will inform future decisions the council makes on this topic as part of the 2026 budget process. Summary of racial equity and inclusion analysis Council members began the session by identifying the goal of increasing city council salary, which focused on reducing economic barriers to serving on city council and taking another step towards fair compensation for the time and work of council members. Other desired outcomes included elevating the professionalism of the council member role and increasing the diversity of the city council candidate pool. During the discussion of increasing candidate diversity, the conversation was primarily surrounded around race, socioeconomic, age, and LGBTQIA+ identities. Council members answered two rounds of questions aimed at identifying racial equity and inclusion impacts as well as two closing reflection questions. These questions are listed below: •What issue are you trying to solve? •What disparities is this change hoping to address? o Racial o Economic o Health o Ability o Gender o Language o Other: age diversity/equity, education •Which racialized and marginalized groups might be impacted or concerned with the issues related to this proposal? •What positive impacts could result from this proposal? Who will benefit? •What negative impacts, intentional and unintentional, could result from this? Who will be disadvantaged? •How should we measure progress? What data will indicate success? •What assumptions are we making? •Are there better ways to reduce racial disparities? What could be added or changed to advance racial equity and inclusion? •Are we fully addressing our initial goal? Key findings The primary racial equity implications and themes raised during the discussion included the following: City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6b) Title: First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members Page 4 •Fair compensation for council work Members of the St. Louis Park City Council are part time by nature of the city’s governance model as set forth in the city charter. While the role is part time, there are components to the role where elected officials are regularly required to engage with city staff and community members. Much of this work occurs primarily on evenings and weekends and constitutes a considerable amount of time. Additionally, council members spend time in and preparing for and attending official meetings, including reviewing agenda materials and communicating with constituents. The current compensation of the mayor and council members as a function of the amount of time council members spend in the role, is estimated to equate to a rate of pay that is at minimum wage or below. Council members are suggesting fair compensation for council work. •Increase work ethos or character of the role Council members have a primary role in governance of the city and significant decision-making authority. Council salary considerations may raise the value, pride, and professionalism of the role; and more accurately reflect the importance of the work and be commensurate with the level of work a council member is asked to perform. •Accessibility For the context of this conversation, accessibility was focused on the need to support those who have different lifestyles or work styles. •Increase diverse candidate pool There is a deep desire of the current council to have diverse representation on the council that reflects the St. Louis Park community. There is an interest in increasing the diversity of the candidate pool and elected officials on the dais. •Notable mentions o Start tracking the number of candidates filing for office based on demographics to see if council salary increase will have an impact on diversity of candidate pools. o Be clear that a council salary increase is to benefit all interested candidates who want to run for elected office and not center a BIPOC individual or a specific community as the reason why a council salary increase is desired. o While council salary may be one factor for individuals deciding to run for elected office, there are numerous factors that contribute to why individuals want to serve (e.g. make meaningful change or impact in the community they serve) or their decision to become or not become a candidate (e.g. interest in role, access, time constraints, family and/or work responsibilities, etc.). •Assumptions o More people will apply to be on council if there is an increase in pay, which will increase and diversify the pool of candidates and lead to broader representation on the dais. o Increasing council salary will/may solve other financial obligations a council member may have (e.g. childcare, personal security, not having to work multiple jobs). City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6b) Title: First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members Page 5 o Residents may be upset about an increase in council salaries but there’s a possibility residents will be understanding and supportive. Racial equity and inclusion recommendations Racial equity and inclusion staff reviewed key themes from each question and recommend the following: 1.Identify metrics to evaluate progress toward desired outcomes. Council is encouraged to identify indicators to monitor the impact of council salary increases and set milestones to assess progress toward the desired outcomes. Currently, the city tracks the number of candidates who file and retention rates. For example, starting in 2027, track voluntarily self-reported demographics of candidates who file for office. 2.Explore strategies for increasing candidate diversity Council members agreed that increasing salary is one piece of a larger desire to increase diversity of candidates and have a broader representation on the dais to reflect our growing and diverse community. It is recommended for council to consider what strategies are already in place to provide opportunities or pathways for people to serve in elected office and to identify a collective goal related to candidate diversity. Once a goal has been identified, council can explore additional strategies as needed to increase civic engagement and build civic identity over time to see if that leads to results that align with the established goal. Another consideration for council is to look at pipeline programs that have been successful in supporting youth civic engagement with one or more identities from low income, Black/African American, Latino/Hispanic, Native American, Asian and Pacific Islanders, LGBTQIA+, and varying physical and mental abilities. Examples of some successful pipeline programs to encourage historically disadvantaged communities/identities to run for elected office are: Urban Scholars (City of Minneapolis), Policy Fellows (University of Minnesota), Minnesota Capitol Pathways (Citizen’s League), and Young Women’s Cabinet (Women’s Foundation of Minnesota). 3.Reference the racial equity impact analysis on city council salary This is an ongoing conversation, and it is important that council use the racial equity impact analysis summary on city council salary as a reference for historical purposes. Council receives automatic salary adjustments every two (2) years. Council may reference the racial equity impact summary analysis on council salary for future decisions related to compensation. Using the racial equity and inclusion impact analysis tool will serve as a check point for council to revisit if their goal is still being met or if there are additional considerations, methods, and approaches needed to address or adjust the goal and outcome council is trying to reach. 4.Consider additional reflection questions to deepen understanding and increase impact a.What unspoken expectations are there for council members based on salary? Or regardless of salary, would there still be unspoken expectations of council members? What are some examples of unspoken expectations of council members? b.Does change in pay for council members change the characteristics of the role? City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6b) Title: First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members Page 6 c.What are defined organizational culture values and practices that continue to uphold the characteristics of the elected role – with or without pay increase? d.What is the current culture and practice to accommodate council members with different life or work styles? e.How can we be more accommodating to council members or aspiring council candidates who have a different lifestyle or workstyle? f.Does increasing council member salary increase candidate diversity (e.g. age, race/ethnicity, gender/sexual orientation, economic class, faith/religious affiliation, etc.)? g.What are additional approaches to address the economic disparity for interested candidates? h.What are other methods to broaden the representation on the dais? Conclusion In general, given the breadth of this discussion, staff believe it would be valuable to dive deeper into the individual key findings raised. Council may consider goals for the next 5, 10, and 15 years by defining metrics for fair compensation and increasing the pool of diverse candidates. The racial equity impact analysis produced ideas to mitigate inequitable outcomes, but it also raised many unanswered questions for the city council to consider moving forward. This include, but are not limited to: •What decisions might be beneficial to table for the future? •What are the potential goals the council wants to see for elected official representation of the community on the dais? •How have council members encouraged or supported the next future generation of our city to run for elected office? City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 6b) Title: First reading of ordinance setting salaries for the mayor and council members Page 7 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Action agenda item: 7a Executive summary Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Recommended action: • Approve a comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use of a portion of 8528 Highway 7 from ROW – Right of Way to COM – Commercial. • Approve a conditional use permit to allow in-vehicle service and the use of off-site and shared parking for 8528 Highway 7 subject to conditions. • Rescind a special permit and approve a conditional use permit for 8530 Highway 7 to allow in-vehicle sales and service and more than one principal building on the site subject to conditions. Summary: Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC applied for a comprehensive plan amendment (CPA) and conditional use permit (CUP) for the proposed development at 8528 Highway 7, along with a separate CUP for the existing commercial development at 8530 Highway 7. The applicant proposes development of a Chipotle restaurant with a drive-through lane for pick-up orders only on a vacant property formerly owned by MNDOT. To facilitate the development, the applicant requests to change the comprehensive plan future land use designation of a portion of the site at 8528 Highway 7 from ROW – Right of Way to COM – Commercial. The applicant also applied for a CUP to allow the in-vehicle sales and service use and allow for off-site and shared parking on the existing commercial lot to the north. These requests are accompanied by requests to rescind the special permit for the existing commercial lot to the north and replace it with a CUP to allow for more than one principal building on a lot and in-vehicle sales and service. The proposed project does not alter the existing buildings on 8530 Highway 7, but changes to site plan will occur. The city council tabled the item at the Sept. 2, 2025 meeting for consideration on Oct. 6, 2025. The applicant provided supplemental materials in response to council comments. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Site survey, site plan, landscape plan, building elevations, draft minutes of Aug. 20, 2025 planning commission meeting, resident comments, memo from Civil Site Group (project team) Prepared by: Katelyn Champoux, associate planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 2 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Discussion Site information: The site at 8528 Highway 7 is directly south of an existing commercial development at 8530 Highway 7. The site was formerly used for a westbound on-ramp to Highway 7 from Aquila Avenue South and was encumbered by a highway easement until the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) released a portion of this easement to Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC in 2022. MnDOT retains a highway easement over the remainder of Tract BB, Registered Land Survey No. 1058. (Note: the parcel shown in blue below is how Hennepin County maps depict the parcel, however, that boundary is inaccurate. The red dashed line better represents the area released by MnDOT. See the attached exhibits for the most accurate maps available). Site area (acres) 0.4 acre unencumbered by highway easement Use Vacant parcel 2040 Future Land Use Right-of-way Zoning C-2 general commercial Surrounding land uses North: Commercial East: Commercial, right-of-way South: Right-of-way West: Commercial City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 3 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Background: The property at 8530 Highway 7 has an existing special permit originally approved in 1985 by Resolution No. 85-99, amended later that same year by Resolution No. 85-138, and amended a second time in 1986 by Resolution No. 86-02. The original special permit allowed grading and construction in the floodplain to accommodate the remodel and expansion of an existing car wash building for retail purposes. Changes to the project necessitated amendments to the special permit to allow the demolition of a previous car wash and construction of an automotive service center. Present considerations: The applicant requests the city: 1) Approve a comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use of a portion of the property located at 8528 Highway 7 from ROW – Right of Way to COM – Commercial. 2) Approve a CUP to allow in-vehicle service and the use of off-site and shared parking for 8528 Highway 7. 3) Rescind the existing special permit for 8530 Highway 7 and replace it with a CUP for 8530 Highway 7 to allow in-vehicle sales and service and more than one principal building on the site. Zoning analysis: Below is a table summarizing the zoning requirements for this project. Further details on some of the requirements are provided after the table. Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Restaurants without intoxicating liquor license In-vehicle services (with CUP) Restaurant, fast food In-vehicle services Yes, with CUP Height 6 stories or 75 feet 1 story Yes Building Materials Minimum 60% class 1; Maximum 10% class 3 Class 1: North - 94%, East - 89%, South - 72%, West - 95% Class 3 materials will not be used on the building. Yes Off-Street Parking 84 total parking spaces required for both lots 84 parking spaces provided between both lots Yes EV charging infrastructure Four parking spaces served by level 2 charging stations with at least one adjacent to an accessible parking space Four parking spaces served by level 2 charging stations, including one accessible parking space Yes Bicycle parking 4 spaces 4 spaces provided Yes Yards – Front / Rear 5 feet n/a 87 feet n/a Yes Yards – Side/Side 5 feet 10 feet, 18 feet Floor Area Ratio 2.0 (maximum) 0.14 Yes Landscaping Tree requirement: 15 trees Shrub requirement: 92 shrubs 15 trees, 92 shrubs Yes City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 4 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Access. The Chipotle lot will not have access to Aquila Avenue South or Highway 7. Customers will access the proposed restaurant from 37th Street West via a proposed easement across the existing commercial site to the north. MnDOT restricted access to Highway 7 when it released its highway easement over a portion of the property located at 8528 Highway 7. The planning commission and staff recommend the city prohibit direct access to Aquila Avenue South and State Highway 7 as a condition of approval in the CUP. A condition of approval also includes city attorney review and approval of the form of the access easement and proof the easement has been recorded. Building materials. The zoning ordinance requires at least 60% class 1 materials, which includes materials such as glass and brick, and allows for up to 10% class 3 materials. The proposed Chipotle restaurant building proposes at least 72% class 1 materials on each building elevation. The project complies with this zoning requirement. Ground floor transparency. The proposed building provides more than 50% transparency along the northern (front) façade, along with more than 20% transparency along Highway 7 and Aquila Avenue South. The proposed building meets the ground floor transparency requirements. Height. The proposed building is one story and approximately 18 feet in height. The maximum height allowed in the C-2 general commercial district is 6 stories or 75 feet. The proposed building meets the height limits. Yards. As noted in the table above, the project complies with all minimum yard requirements for the building. Off-street parking. The zoning ordinance requires 26 parking spaces for the Chipotle site and 68 parking spaces for the uses on the existing commercial lot to the north. The zoning ordinance allows the minimum parking requirement to be reduced by up to 10% for any parcel located within one-quarter mile of regular bus transit service, as defined in the ordinance. Bus Route 17 with 15-minute weekday service stops along 37th Street West adjacent to the existing commercial property north of 8528 Highway 7. Both properties qualify for the 10% reduction, which reduces the total minimum parking requirement to 84 parking spaces. The proposed plan provides 68 parking spaces in the existing commercial lot, including six spaces provided by the parking bays in the Firestone building, and 16 parking spaces in the Chipotle lot for a total of 84 parking spaces. The applicant requests a CUP for off-site and shared parking with the existing commercial lot given the Chipotle parking lot is an extension of the existing parking lot and the Chipotle lot cannot accommodate the minimum required parking for the proposed use. The applicant is required to execute perpetual access and parking easement agreement(s) with the adjacent property to allow for off-site parking, shared parking and driveway access. As a condition of approval recommended by city staff, the applicant must submit the agreement to the city for the city attorney’s review and approval, and they must submit proof of recording the agreement to the city. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 5 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE). Two (2) level-2 EV chargers will serve a total of four parking spaces on the site, including one ADA parking space and conduit for future EV charging of at least 21 parking spaces. The project complies with the EVSE requirements. Bicycle parking. The zoning code requires bicycle parking spaces equivalent to 10% of the automobile parking spaces, but no less than four bicycle parking spaces. This project requires four (4) bicycle parking spaces, which are provided on the west side of the proposed building. Landscaping. The zoning ordinance requires one tree per 50 lineal feet of site perimeter. Fifteen (15) trees are required for the Chipotle lot. Seven (7) trees will be planted on the Chipotle lot and eight (8) trees will be planted on part of the adjacent site impacted by the project for a total of 15 trees. The zoning ordinance also requires at least 92 shrubs for this project. This requirement is met by the new shrubs planted on both sites. Screening. The zoning ordinance requires all off-street parking areas located within 30 feet of a public right-of-way to provide screening between the parking lot and right-of-way, except at access points. The project proposes shrubs and trees along the eastern property line abutting Aquila Avenue South. The zoning ordinance also requires refuse and recycling handling to be entirely screened from off-site views utilizing a privacy fence or wall that is at least six feet in height. The new trash enclosure proposed for this project will be screened by a six-foot tall fence. Comprehensive plan amendment analysis: The applicant requests a change to the future land use designation of a portion of 8528 Highway 7 from ROW – Right of Way to COM – Commercial. Below is the existing and proposed future land use map showing the change. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 6 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 A request to amend the city’s land use plan should be evaluated from the perspective of land use planning principles and community goals. These reflect the community’s long-range vision and broad goals about what kind of community it wants to be and what makes strong neighborhoods. General consistency with the comprehensive plan The city’s land use plan should reflect the broad goals, policies and implementation strategies incorporated in the comprehensive plan. These elements are the basis for evaluating the requested change. Commercial and office land use goal #1: Preserve and enhance community commercial centers that offer desirable and complementary commercial retail and services for the community’s residents, workers and visitors. A. Minimize the adverse impacts associated with large community commercial centers using design, performance standards, site planning techniques, minimizing surface parking, buffering and traffic management. B. Encourage infill development and aesthetic improvements to commercial surface parking lots in order to enhance adjacent public streets and sidewalks to more efficiently utilize commercial land. Impacts to surrounding properties and the physical character of the neighborhood Staff do not anticipate significant impacts to surrounding properties nor the physical character of the neighborhood given the existing commercial uses surrounding the project site. The properties to the north, east and west contain a variety of commercial uses including retail, restaurant and service. The 2040 comprehensive plan guides the adjacent properties for COM – Commercial, which is intended to accommodate a wide range and scale of commercial uses. Regional policy Metropolitan Council review of this comprehensive plan amendment is required. The Metropolitan Council must authorize the city to put the amendment into effect. Staff expect that an amendment to change the future land use of a portion of 8528 Highway 7 from ROW – Right of way to COM – Commercial would be viewed favorably by the Metropolitan Council. Staff find the goals and policies of the 2040 comprehensive plan support guiding this portion of the property for COM – Commercial uses. Conditional use permit (CUP) analysis: Staff finds the application meets the following general requirements for CUPs listed in city code section 36-33(b): 1. Consistency with plans. It is consistent with and supportive of principles, goals, objectives, land use designations, redevelopment plans, neighborhood objectives, and implementation strategies of the comprehensive plan. The use of this property as a fast- food restaurant is consistent with the comprehensive plan, with approval of the comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use guiding from right-of- way to commercial. The proposed project meets the requirements of a fast-food City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 7 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 restaurant located within the C-2 general commercial zoning district, along with additional requirements for in-vehicle services and off-site parking. 2. Nuisance. It is not detrimental to the health, safety, morals, and general welfare of the community. It will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, parking facilities on adjacent streets, and values of properties in close proximity to the conditional use. Staff do not anticipate the proposed project will have adverse impacts on the existing and anticipated traffic conditions adjacent to the site. In 2014, the City of Hopkins partnered with the City of St. Louis Park and other affected jurisdictions on the Blake Road Corridor Study to plan for changing transportation needs in this corridor. The study area included the intersection of Aquila Avenue South and 37th Street West in St. Louis Park, which is adjacent to the proposed Knollwood Chipotle project site. The study examined the existing and future (2035) level of service for this intersection and identified an overall level of service of A-B for both timeframes. Given this information, staff find that a traffic study is not necessary for the proposed project and do not anticipate adverse impacts to traffic flows in this area. 3. Compliance with code. It is consistent with the regulations, intent and purpose of city code and the zoning district in which the conditional use is located. The proposed use meets the conditions required for restaurants and in-vehicle services located in the C-2 general commercial zoning district. 4. Consistency with service capacity. It will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, services or improvements which are either existing or proposed. The proposal is consistent with sewer and water service capacity. 5. Site design. It is consistent with the design and other requirements of site and landscape plans prepared by or under the direction of a professional landscape architect or civil engineer registered in the state and adopted as part of the conditions imposed on the use by the city council. The site design meets these requirements. 6. Consistency with utilities. It is consistent with the city’s stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water plans. The utilities have capacity for the proposed use. Staff find the application meets the following requirements for CUPs listed in city code section 36-194(d)(11). These conditions are specific to in-vehicle sales and services located in the C-2 general commercial zoning district: 1. Drive-through facilities and stacking areas shall not be located within 100 feet of any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential use, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community centers, unless the entire facility and stacking areas are separated from the lot in a N district by a building wall. The proposed project is not located within 100 feet of any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential use or has an occupied institutional building. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 8 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 2. Stacking shall be provided for six cars per customer service point and shall comply with all yard requirements. The proposed pickup lane can accommodate a queue of eight (8) cars without encroaching into the driveway and parking areas. 3. This use shall only be permitted when it can be demonstrated that the operation will not have a significant adverse effect on the existing level of service on adjacent streets and intersections. The Blake Road Corridor Study indicated an overall level of service of A-B at the intersection of Aquila Avenue South and 37th Street West in its analysis of existing service levels and 2035 service levels. 4. The drive-through facility shall be designed so it does not impede traffic or impair vehicular and pedestrian traffic movement, or exacerbate the potential for pedestrian or vehicular conflicts. The proposed pickup lane can accommodate a queue of eight (8) cars without encroaching into the driveway and parking areas. The facility does not include an order board and the lane is used for pick-up of online orders only. 5. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the comprehensive plan as a collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets. The new restaurant site located at 8528 Highway 7 will be accessed from 37th Street West via a shared driveway and easement across the site at 8530 Highway 7. This street connects to Aquila Avenue South to the east, which is classified as a Major Collector. 6. Any canopy constructed as part of this use shall be compatible with the architectural design and materials of the principal structure. This condition is met. The proposal does not include a canopy over the drive-thru lane. 7. The use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan including any provisions of the redevelopment chapter and the plan by neighborhood policies for the neighborhood in which it is located and conditions of approval may be added as a means of satisfying this requirement. This condition is met, with approval of the comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use guiding from ROW – Right of way to COM – Commercial. Staff find the application meets the following requirements for CUPs listed in city code section 36-361(j). These conditions are specific to off-site parking in any zoning district: 1. Paved pedestrian access shall be provided and maintained between the off-site parking facility and the principal structure. This condition is met. The proposed project provides concrete walkways along all sides of the building, except for the side adjacent to the drive-thru lane. 2. The off-site parking facility shall be located no further than 300 feet from a residential structure and no further than 500 feet from a non-residential structure. Shuttle service may be provided as an alternative means of access for non-residential uses. The off-site parking is provided on the adjacent lot to the north with which 8528 Highway 7 shares a parking lot. The proposed off-site parking will meet the distance requirements. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 9 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 3. Off-site parking facilities shall be protected by an irrevocable covenant recorded by the county. A certified copy of the recorded document shall be provided to the Zoning Administrator within 60 days after approval of the agreement by the city council. The applicant is aware of this requirement. Staff will include this requirement as a condition of approval to ensure it is met. Staff find the project meets all general CUP requirements as well as the specific requirements for in-vehicle sales and services in the C-2 general commercial zoning district. Next steps: Staff will submit the comprehensive plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review and authorization. Public outreach: A public hearing notice was posted in the Sun Sailor and mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the site. Planning commission: The planning commission held a public hearing on Aug. 20, 2025. No members of the public attended the meeting. One resident provided comments via email indicating their opposition to the project given the city’s strategic priority of environmental stewardship and goals for reducing vehicle emissions. The planning commission recommended approval of the applications with a 6-1 vote. The draft minutes are attached to this report. City council: The city council reviewed the recommended actions on Sept. 2, 2025. Council Member Budd made a motion to table the recommended actions and revisit them at the Oct. 6, 2025, city council meeting, which was seconded by Council Member Brausen. In discussion, Council Member Brausen shared his reservations about approving a project with a drive- through, given the city’s sustainability goals. Five council members attended the Sept. 2, 2025, meeting and the comprehensive plan amendment requires five votes of approval to pass. The city council chose to table the recommended actions to a later date to allow for broader discussion with the full council. Previous/future actions Governing body Date Public hearing and recommendation of approval of the applications. Planning commission Aug. 20, 2025 Resolution for approval of CPA and two CUPs City council Sept. 2, 2025 Motion to table recommended actions and revisit at the Oct. 6, 2025 city council meeting City council Sept. 2, 2025 Resolution for approval of CPA and two CUPs City council Oct. 6, 2025 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 10 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Resolution No. 25 -__ Supporting the approval of an amendment to the 2040 comprehensive plan for the City of St. Louis Park under Minnesota Statutes 462.351 to 462.365 for a portion of the property located at 8528 Highway 7 Whereas, the 2040 comprehensive plan (the “plan”) was adopted by the city council on August 5, 2019; and Whereas, the use of said plan will ensure a safer, more pleasant, and more economical environment for residential, commercial, industrial, and public activities and will promote the public health, safety and general welfare; and Whereas, said plan will prepare the community for anticipated and desirable change, thereby bringing about significant savings in both private and public expenditures; and Whereas, said plan has taken due cognizance of the planning activities of adjacent units of government; and Whereas, said plan is to be periodically reviewed by the City of St. Louis Park planning commission and amendments made, if justified according to procedures, rules and laws, and provided such amendments would provide a positive result and are consistent with other provisions in the plan; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park planning commission held a public hearing and recommended adoption of an amendment to said plan on August 20, 2025; and Whereas, the city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission; and Whereas, the contents of planning case file 25-03-CP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case, Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that said plan, as previously adopted by the city council, is hereby amended as follows and as shown in the attached exhibits: Change the future land use designation for a portion of the property at 8528 Highway 7 from ROW – Right of way to COM – Commercial; the property as shown in “Exhibit A” attached hereto. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 11 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Be it further resolved, city staff are instructed to submit the comprehensive plan amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review and authorization to place the comprehensive plan amendment into effect. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 12 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 EXHIBIT “A” City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 13 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Resolution No. 25 -__ Approving a conditional use permit under Section 36-33 of the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance to allow in-vehicle service and the use of off-site and shared parking at 8528 Highway 7 Whereas, Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC applied for approval of a conditional use permit for the purpose of constructing a Chipotle restaurant with in-vehicle services, off-site parking, and shared parking at 8528 Highway 7; the property is legally described in “Exhibit A” attached hereto; and Whereas, the property is guided ROW – right of way in the comprehensive plan future land use map; and Whereas, the future land use of the property will change to COM – Commercial with approval of a comprehensive plan amendment by city council and authorization by the Metropolitan Council; and Whereas, the property is located in the C-2 general commercial zoning district; and Whereas, the city council has determined that the application meets the conditions for in- vehicle service in the C-2 general commercial zoning district, including: 1. Drive-through facilities and stacking areas shall not be located within 100 feet of any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential use, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community centers, unless the entire facility and stacking areas are separated from the lot in a N district by a building wall. 2. Stacking shall be provided for six cars per customer service point and shall comply with all yard requirements. 3. This use shall only be permitted when it can be demonstrated that the operation will not have a significant adverse effect on the existing level of service on adjacent streets and intersections. 4. The drive-through facility shall be designed so it does not impede traffic or impair vehicular and pedestrian traffic movement, or exacerbate the potential for pedestrian or vehicular conflicts. 5. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the comprehensive plan as a collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets. 6. Any canopy constructed as part of this use shall be compatible with the architectural design and materials of the principal structure. 7. The use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan including any provisions of the redevelopment chapter and the plan by neighborhood policies for the neighborhood in which it is located and conditions of approval may be added as a means of satisfying this requirement. Whereas, the city council has determined that the application meets the conditions for off- site parking, including: City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 14 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 1. Paved pedestrian access shall be provided and maintained between the off-site parking facility and the principal structure. 2. The off-site parking facility shall be located no further than 300 feet from a residential structure and no further than 500 feet from a non-residential structure. Shuttle service may be provided as an alternative means of access for non-residential uses. 3. Off-site parking facilities shall be protected by an irrevocable covenant recorded by the county. A certified copy of the recorded document shall be provided to the Zoning Administrator within 60 days after approval of the agreement by the city council. Whereas, the city council has determined that the application meets the conditions for shared parking, including: 1. The uses shall have their highest peak demand for parking at substantially different times of the day or week, or an adequate amount of parking shall be available for both uses during shared hours of peak demand. 2. The minimum spaces required under a shared parking agreement shall be based on the number of spaces required for the use that requires the most parking. 3. A shared parking agreement shall be filed with the city. The terms of the shared parking agreement shall include, at a minimum: a. The hours, size, and a description of the operation of each of the tenants. b. A dimensioned site plan showing the location and number of parking spaces. c. A plan for remediating conflicts between tenants. The plan shall identify the property owner or designee as being responsible for administering and enforcing the agreement. d. A statement acknowledging that the city may deny a proposed use or expansion of an existing use if it deems the site does not have sufficient parking. e. The plan shall be signed by the property owner. Whereas, the in-vehicle services use, off-site parking and shared parking are consistent with and supportive of principles, goals, objectives, land use designations, redevelopment plans, neighborhood objectives, and implementation strategies of the comprehensive plan; and Whereas, the in-vehicle services use, off-site parking and shared parking are not detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community as a whole. It will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, parking facilities on adjacent streets, and values of properties in close proximity to the conditional use; and Whereas, the in-vehicle services use, off-site parking and shared parking are consistent with the regulations, intent and purpose of city code and the zoning district in which the conditional use is located; and Whereas, the in-vehicle services use, off-site parking and shared parking will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, services or improvements which are either existing or proposed; and City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 15 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Whereas, the in-vehicle services use, off-site parking and shared parking are consistent with the design and other requirements of site and landscape plans prepared by or under the direction of a professional landscape architect or civil engineer registered in the state and adopted as part of the conditions imposed on the use by the city council; and Whereas, the in-vehicle services use, off-site parking and shared parking are consistent with the city’s stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water plans; and Whereas, the in-vehicle services use, off-site parking and shared parking comply with all conditions imposed by the city council and listed within the conditional use permit; and Whereas, the contents of Case No. 25-04-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of the record of decision for this case, Now therefore be it resolved, that the conditional use permit is hereby approved and accepted by the city council as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, city plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the city attorney and certification by the city clerk and subject to the following conditions: 1. City council approval of the comprehensive plan amendment to COM – Commercial and Metropolitan Council authorization of the comprehensive plan amendment associated with the development applications. 2. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved official exhibits and city code. 3. Construction and staging information will be provided to staff for review and approval before building permits are issued. 4. In-vehicle sales are prohibited on the site. 5. Direct driveway access to Aquila Avenue South and State Highway 7 are prohibited. 6. All new utility service structures shall be buried. 7. Prior to installation of any new signs, the applicant shall submit the necessary sign permits and a site sign plan that shows all existing and proposed signs. No signs will be permitted in public right-of-way. 8. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility and city representatives. b. All necessary permits shall be obtained. 9. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. Final construction plans for the private stormwater system shall be signed by a registered engineer and approved by the city engineer. b. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times the estimated costs for private site improvements including landscaping and private stormwater management system. c. A perpetual access and parking easement agreement(s) shall be executed between both properties to allow for off-site parking, shared parking, and driveway access. The agreement shall include a site plan designating parking stalls for use by customers of motor vehicle service use. Said agreement must City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 16 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 be submitted to the city for the city attorney’s review and approval as to the form of the agreement. Proof of recording the city approved agreement shall be submitted to the city. d. A perpetual utility easement agreement shall be executed between both properties. Said agreement must be submitted to the city for the city attorney’s review and approval as to the form of the agreement. Proof of recording the city approved shall be submitted to the city. e. A complete and compliant Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be provided to and approved by the city. 10. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All city noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 7 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d. The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the city engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f. The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. g. Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 11. Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the official exhibits. 12. Upon city approval of and acceptance of private site improvements, the developer shall provide a one-year warranty in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit for 25% of the final construction costs of the improvements. 13. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 14. The conditional use permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the use, building or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed or abandoned. 15. Approval of a building permit, which may impose additional requirements. It is further resolved that the city clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Register of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 17 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 18 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 EXHIBIT “A” Tract BB, Registered Land Survey No. 1058, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 19 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Resolution No. 25 -__ Rescinding a special permit granted by Resolution No. 86-02 to allow grading and construction of an automotive service center for property located in the B-2 Business district and F-2 Flood plain district at 8500-8530 Highway 7, and Approving a conditional use permit under Section 36-33 of the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance to allow more than one principal building on one lot and allow in-vehicle sales and service at 8530 Highway 7 Whereas, Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC applied for a conditional use permit to allow more than one principal building on one lot and to allow in-vehicle sales and services at 8530 Highway 7; the property is legally described in “Exhibit A” attached hereto; and Whereas, a special permit was issued regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 85-99 of the St. Louis Park city council dated July 15, 1985, which contained conditions applicable to said property; and Whereas, due to changed circumstances, Resolution No. 85-99 was rescinded and a special permit was issued regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 85-138 of the St. Louis Park city council dated September 16, 1985, which contained conditions applicable to said property; and Whereas, due to changed circumstances, Resolution No. 85-138 was rescinded and a special permit was issued regarding the subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 86-02 of the St. Louis Park city council dated January 6, 1986, which contained conditions applicable to said property; and Whereas, the use for which Resolution No. 86-02 was adopted does not require a special permit under the current St. Louis Park zoning ordinance; and Whereas, a conditional use permit is required by the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance to allow more than one principal building on one lot and to allow in-vehicle sales and services; and Whereas, it is the intent of this resolution to rescind Resolution No. 86-02 and approve a conditional use permit at the subject site; and Whereas, the contents of Case Nos. 85-37-SP, 85-61-SP and 85-86-SP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case; and Whereas, the property is guided COM – Commercial in the comprehensive plan future land use map; and Whereas, the property is located in the C-2 general commercial zoning district; and City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 20 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Whereas, the city council has determined that the application meets the conditions for in- vehicle sales and services in the C-2 general commercial zoning district, including: 1. Drive-through facilities and stacking areas shall not be located within 100 feet of any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential use, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community centers, unless the entire facility and stacking areas are separated from the lot in a N district by a building wall. 2. Stacking shall be provided for six cars per customer service point and shall comply with all yard requirements. 3. This use shall only be permitted when it can be demonstrated that the operation will not have a significant adverse effect on the existing level of service on adjacent streets and intersections. 4. The drive-through facility shall be designed so it does not impede traffic or impair vehicular and pedestrian traffic movement or exacerbate the potential for pedestrian or vehicular conflicts. 5. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the comprehensive plan as a collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets. 6. Any canopy constructed as part of this use shall be compatible with the architectural design and materials of the principal structure. 7. The use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan including any provisions of the redevelopment chapter and the plan by neighborhood policies for the neighborhood in which it is located and conditions of approval may be added as a means of satisfying this requirement. Whereas, the in-vehicle sales and services use on this property is consistent with and supportive of principles, goals, objectives, land use designations, redevelopment plans, neighborhood objectives, and implementation strategies of the comprehensive plan; and Whereas, the in-vehicle sales and services use on this property is not detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community as a whole. It will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, parking facilities on adjacent streets, and values of properties in close proximity to the conditional use; and Whereas, the in-vehicle sales and services use on this property is consistent with the regulations, intent and purpose of city code and the zoning district in which the conditional use is located; and Whereas, the in-vehicle sales and services use on this property will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, services or improvements which are either existing or proposed; and Whereas, the in-vehicle sales and services use on this property is consistent with the design and other requirements of site and landscape plans prepared by or under the direction of a City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 21 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 professional landscape architect or civil engineer registered in the state and adopted as part of the conditions imposed on the use by the city council; and Whereas, the in-vehicle sales and services use on this property is consistent with the city’s stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water plans; and Whereas, the in-vehicle sales and services use on this property complies with all conditions imposed by the city council and listed within the conditional use permit; and Whereas, the contents of Case No. 25-04-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of the record of decision for this case, Now therefore be it resolved ,that the city council hereby rescinds the Resolution No. 86- 02 and approves and accepts the conditional use permit as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, city plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the city attorney and certification by the city clerk and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibit A1 – Site Plan; Exhibit B1 – Grading and Drainage Plan; Exhibit C1 – Site Plan; Exhibit D1 – Floor Plan; Exhibit E1 – Elevation Plan; and Exhibit F1 – Landscape Plan. (Exhibits are on file in the Community Development Department at the City of St. Louis Park). 2. Structure on the property shall have a minimum floor elevation of 905.8 NGVD. 3. Any rooftop equipment shall be screened with materials which are architecturally compatible with the main structure. 4. Any exterior lighting on the site shall be provided such that light rays will be directed perpendicular to the ground surface and will not be directly visible from off the site. 5. All improvements shall be completed by October 15, 1986. 6. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 7. The conditional use permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the building or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed. It is further resolved that the city clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Register of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 6, 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Page 22 Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 EXHIBIT “A” Lot 1, Block 1, Pure’s Knollwood Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property ---- ---- I I --------- affT 3 7T H 12 S r I' RIGHT OF r pusuc FOOT v,1D --r- 7 .. 1/ I - 0 CS LIMITED PARTNERSH . 0. 7, ST. LOUIS PARK P.I.D. 18-1'7,-21-43-0037 I - • • I >, -- \ \ \ \ \ \ ' -0 ' \\ \ \ \ \ ,- SECTION 18, T 117N, R 21 W VICINITY MAP NO SCALE 0 • @ (XXX.XX) (Nxx·xx·xx"E) � 50 100 SCALE IN FEET FOUND IRON MONUMENT SET IRON MONUMENT MARKED WITH LICENSE NUMBER 47476 RECORD DISTANCE RECORD BEARING BENCHMARK ITEM12 -----STREET EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 1448831-.\---------\._t>°' t:f'; - 150 -- I L I\ n - - -- "3 vi 9 -----:j B1 _____ _ a I\ n-n u I .. ,.., V � I I n V I L PARCEL I< I I L/ C) I \ I A I vv \ I V r L PARCEL \/ I N88"33'54•w (N8815'W) 730.99 (731.08) SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: ITEM 11: Terms and conditions of Resolution No. 86-02 adopted January 6, 1986, filed January 14, 1986, as Document No. 1697597. (as to Parcel 1) Said terms and conditions affect a portion of the surveyed property. No plottable items to depict. ITEM 12: Easement for street purposes, in favor of City of St. Louis Pork, as created in Quit Claim Deed doted November 10, 1981, filed November 25, 1981, as Document No. 1448831. (as to Parcel 1) Said easement affects the surveyed property and is depicted hereon. ITEM 13: Terms and conditions of and easements contained In Easement doted Moy 20, 1985, flied September 30, 1985, as Document No. 1674593. (as to Parcel 1) Said terms, conditions and easements affect the surveyed property. No. Plattoble items to depict. Note: Parcel 1 & Parcel 2 of Exhibit A of said document are now Parcel 1 of the surveyed property. ITEM 14: Terms and conditions of and easements contained in Grant of Perpetual Easement dated August 28, 1985, filed September 30, 1985, as Document No. 1674594. (as to Parcel 1) Said easement affects the surveyed property and is depicted hereon. Note: Said easement burdens a portion of Parcel 1 for the benefit of another portion of Parcel 1. ITEM 15: Terms and conditions of Resolution No. 1-93 adopted January 28, 1993, filed April 1, 1993, as Document No. 2360548. (as to Parcel 1) Said terms ond conditions affect the surveyed property. No plottable items to depict. (possibly depict parking setback???) ITEM 16: Easements for sidewalk and utility purposes, in favor of the City of St. Louis Park, as granted in Easement dated Februory 21, 1996, flied July 25, 1996, as Document No. 2727679. (os to Parcel 1) Said easements affect the surveyed property and are depicted hereon. 7 a - a 1 - nv r· - n u -- n L.J - -- \ \ \ \ � ' \ ' � -0 0 0 0 ' \• \ I � \ ' " \ " \u \ OWNER: KOEHLER ASSCS LJMITE:D PARTNERSHIP 8401 STA TF HWY. NO. 7, HOPKINS P.I.D. 18-T17-21-4:J-0023 !'J "I-.!O � � ITEM 17: Subject to the following matters as shown on the survey prepared by Schoell & Madson, Inc, dated June 30, 2005: a)Aquila Avenue South crosses the most Easterly corner of subject property.b)A retaining wall encroaches onto the right of way of Highway 7. ( as to Parcel 1) NOTE: This item carried forword from prior title evidence. ITEM 18: Droinage and utility easements as shown on plat. NOTE: Appears as a Recital on Certificate of Title No. 1544626. (as to Parcel 2) � <O .... 0 L,J ;,. r 0 There are no drainage and utility easements depicted on Registered Land Survey No. 1058 or on the plat of PURE'S KNOLLWOOD ADDITION. ITEM 19: Highway Easement by Target Stores, Inc. to State of Minnesota dated October 2, 1962, filed November 27, 1962, Document No. 710891. (as to Parcel 2) Terms and conditions of Quit Claim Deed Easement releasing Highway Easement by State of Minnesota, including restriction on access to Highway 7 dated December 6, 2022 filed December 8, 2022 Document No. 5990220. ( os to Porcel 2) Said easement affects the surveyed property and ls depleted hereon (See Surveyor's Notes 2 & 3). The area described in Quit Claim Deed Doc. No. 5990220 is depicted hereon. ITEM 20: Plat of Hennepin County Stole Aid Highwoy No. 20, dated June 21, 1973 filed June 22, 1973 Document No. 1074930. (as to Parcel 2) Said plat lies adjacent to and southerly of the surveyed property. The location of said right of way plat is depicted hereon for reference. AL TA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: Lindsay Group LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Parcel 1: Lot 1, Block 1, Pure's Knollwood Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property Parcel 2: Tract BB, Registered Land Survey No. 1058, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Torrens Property SURVEYOR'S NOTE: 1.The descriptions utilized for Line 1 and Line 2 in Doc. No. 5990220 appear to be on two separate basis ofbearing systems which results in ambiguity of the location of the area released in said document. 2.Line 1 described in Document No. 5990220 does not have o basis of bearing and appears to have a scrivener'serror ln the call of "thence North 227 degrees 54 mfnutes West for 73.17 feet". This results in ambiguity ofthe location of the area released in said document. 3. A portion of Parcel 2 (Tract BB, Registered Land Survey No. 1058) lies within the City of St. Louis Park, whilethe remaining portion of Parcel 2 lies within the City of Hopkins. The boundary line between St. Louis Park andHopkins is depicted hereon. GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: 1.The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Hennepin County coordinate grid (NAO 83-2011 Adj.). 2.The legal description and eosement information used in the preparotion of this survey is based on theCommitment for Title Insurance prepared by Chicago Title Insurance Company, Commitment No. CP72749 datedSeptember 27, 2023 at 7: 00 am . 3.The surveyed property hes direct access to 37th Street West. a public right of woy. OPTIONAL TABLE A ITEMS: 1.Monuments have been placed at all major corners of the surveyed property described hereon, unless alreadymarked or referenced by existing monuments or witnesses in close proximity to the corner. 2.The addresses of the property described hereon ore: 3. 4. 5. PARCEL 1 (Hennepin County P.I.D. 18-117-21-43-0002)8530 State Highway No. 7, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426 PARCEL 2 (Hennepin County P.1.D. 18-117-21-43-0041)Address Pending, St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426 NOTE: Parcel 2, Tract BB, Registered Land Survey No. 1058 Is located within the city limits of both St. LouisPork ond the City of Hopkins. The property described hereon Iles wlthln Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chancefloodplain) per Federal Insurance Rate Map No. 27053 C 0342 F, dated November 4, 2016. The total area of the property described hereon is 245,256 square feet or 5.63030 acres. The area of theproperty hereon described less areas used for right-of-woy purposes is 77,484 square feet or 1. 77879 acres. The contours depicted hereon ore per elevation data collected while conducting the fieldwork.The contour interval is 1 foot. BENCHMARK: Top of Minnesota Department of Transportation Geodetic Monument "SONYA" Elevation ~ 902.02 feet. (NAVD88) 60.No zoning report or letter was received from the insurer pursuant to Optional Table A Item 6(0), as set forthin the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys. 7a. Exterior building dimensions are depicted hereon. 7b1. The exterior building footprint areas at ground level ore depicted hereon. 7c. The measured building heights ore depicted hereon. 8.Substantial features observed in the process of conducting the fieldwork ore depicted hereon. 9. As of the date of this survey the property described hereon contains a total of 71 parking spaces of which 68 ore standard spaces and 3 ore handicapped spaces . 110.Existing utilities, services and underground structures shown hereon were located either physically, from existingrecords made available to us, by resident testimony, or by locations provided by Gopher State One Call, perTicket No. 232763136. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot beaccurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, theclient is advised that excavation may be necessary. Other utilities and services may be present and verificationand location of all utilities and services should be obtained from the owners of the respective utilities prior toany design, planning or excavation. 13.The names of adjoining owners according to current tax records are depicted hereon. 14.The intersection of Aquila Avenue South & 37th Street West is located at the northeasterly corner of thesurveyed property. 16.As of the date of this survey there is observable evidence of current earth moving work, building constructionor building additions on the property described hereon. A portion of the surveyed property along the westerlyproperty line was re-graded and sod installed after the field survey. See clouded area on Sheet 2. 18.The plottable offsite easements or servitudes disclosed in documents provided to the surveyor ore depictedhereon. CERTIFICATION: To Lindsay-Knollwood, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, and Chicago Title Insurance Company. This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2021 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Lond Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by AL TA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(a), 7(o), 7(b)(1), 7(c), 8, 9, 11(a), 13, 14, 16 and 18 of Table A thereof. The fieldwork was completed on October 14, 2023. Date of Plat or Mop: November 1, 2023. Eric A Roeser Minnesota License No. 47476 eroeser@efnsurvey.com SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR DETAIL OF EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS _F _IE_L_D_B_O_O_K -+-P_A_G_E-1 b'�lfi=�ORK REVISIONS ------+-----<DF SW NO. DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: t--1 -+-2_0 _23......,.1_1,_,_2_8 1-A_d_d_n e_w_l�r_e -�r_a_d _ed_a_r_ea_l_o_s_u_r_fa_c_e . _______ -la------�------1 '--P wM ... D ____ l---'2 =-+=-20;::.;2;::.;3CL..;.12"'-'0;::.;7+-'A d;::.;d::....:;d .;:;;el"-i n"'e..:;.al;:.:;e..:;.d _w;;.;e;::.;l;.;;la""nd.:;....;.lo;;.;c;::.;a""li..:;.on"------------1 DRAWING NAME: 41658 ALTA.dwg JOB NO. 41658 -------FILE NO. 868 CHECKED BY: EAR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY SURVEY FOR: PROPERTY ADDRESS: Lindsay Group 8530 State Highway No. 7 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426 Hennepin County P.I.D.18-117-21-43-0002 & 18-117-21-43-0041 475 Old Highway 8 NW, Suite 200 New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 PHONE: (612) 466·3300 WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM Egon, Field & Nowak, Inc. coPYRIGHT © 2023 By EGAN, FIELD & NowAK, 1Nc. land surveyors since 1872 SHEET1 OF2 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 23 -------------------- "' ---ss ------- F.F.E.=908.02 FEET- \ ------F.F.E.=907.96 FEET.._ \ I 0 20 40 60 SCALE IN FEET -- '{/, / ... : ,11.· •• . J F.F.E.=907.95 FEET_, 4 FIELD BOOK PAGE FIELDWORK REVISIONS CHIEF: - \ • \ I I \ -- I I u C>I \ A ,\A n = :::FffTl \ u rar \-�=r \ HEIGHT = 11.7 FEET @ R.E.•905.6 I I.E.=904.3(W)I.E.�903.7(SUMP) I I T I I I nV J L I\ II 'I I\ II 'J y f ,,... V nV T J -------------so,, /TEM12 } �TREET EASEMENT PER DOCUMENT NO. 1448831-� ----,' Sq,� \ 8500-8520STATEHIGHWAYNO. 7 ONE STORY BRICK & STUCCO BUILDING BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA = 7,752 SQUARE FEET I L_ I L I A I V V n V nV -----------•O" -------- SURVEY FOR: ------+-----IDF SW NO. DATE DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: t--1 -+-2_0 _23...._,.1_1...,_2_8 t-A _d_d _ne_w _l�r_e-�r_a_d _ed_a_r_ea_t _o _s_u_r_fa_c _e. _______ -la------�-----<PMD 2 2023 1 2 07 Add de lineated we tla nd location DRAWING NAME: '--"-""-----1-=-i�'-'--'-�'-+--'-'-'--'-'-"-'--'--'-"-"-'-�"-"---'-'-'-'-'-'-'-----------1 41658 ALTA.dwg JOB NO. 41658 CHECKED BY: ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY ------FILE NO. 868 EAR Lindsay Group I\ I I 'I n V 8J 1 I ,..,l.J -- AL TA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY FOR: LEGEND: ® ® lii/AOR@ l> (QI ® IJI Ill (Bl * b. - @ l2l� 1£1 wl • tlC 1751 Lindsay Group SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN FLARED END SECTION ROOF DRAIN (OUTLET) ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC BOX ELECTRIC METER HANDHOLE LIGHT UTILITY POLE GUY 1'11RE SEMAPHORE TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX PEDESTRIAN POST COMMUNICATION BOX GAS METER BOLLARD SIGN HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN PARKING COUNT ---•--- -0-0-0- ---s--- --ss --- ---E--- --OHW-----G--- ,,.---9 20/ 8aRi: b '.. : ·-I !ggggggggggl � LIMITED ACCESS CHAIN LINK FENCE SANITARY SEl'l1ER STORM SEWER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD 'MRE UNDERGROUND GAS EXISTING CONTOUR LINE TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE TRUNCATED DOME RAMP RIP-RAP SURFACE ---- ---- GOPHER STATE ONE CALL NOTE: List of utilities notified per Gopher State One Call Ticket No. 232763136. ARVJG COMCAST CITY OF HOPKINS CITY OF HOPKINS STREET /TRAFFIC CITY OF HOPKINS IRRIGATION CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK WATER CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK STREETS CENTURYLINK -CTLQL LOGIS MCI CENTER POINT ENERGY MNDOT US INTERNET CORP XCEL ENERGY ...._ PROPERTY ADDRESS: 8530 State Highway No. 7 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55426 Hennepin County P.I.D.18-117-21-43-0002 & 18-117-21-43-0041 475 Old Highway 8 NW, Suite 200 New Brighton, Minnesota 55112 PHONE: (612) 466-3300 WWW.EFNSURVEY.COMEgon. Field & Nowak, Inc. coPYRIGHT@ 2023 By EGAN, FIELD & NowAK, 1Nc. land surveyors since 1872 SHEET2O F2 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 24 ITEM 1 4 ITEM 1 4 N O P A R K I N G N OPA R K I N G STATE HIGH W A Y 7 37,500 AADT ( 2 0 1 9 ) A Q U I L A A V E S 4, 0 0 0 A A D T ( 2 0 2 0 ) 37TH STREE T W CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 8 9 3 11 7 1 8 . 0 ' 5 . 0 ' 26.0' 16.0' 5.7' 20.0 ' 7.6' ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ARROW. DO NOT PAINT, FOR CODE REVIEW ONLY, TYP. 5 . 0 ' 7 . 0 ' 5.0' EXISTING FIRESTONE 4,366 SF EXISTING WELLS FARGO EXISTING MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING 7,752 SF 1 2 . 0 ' 1 1 . 1 ' 2,581 SF 5' PARKING SETBACK PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 5' PARKING SETBACK FULL BIT. PVMT. RECONSTRUCT, TYP, SEE FINAL GEOTECH FOR THICKNESS TRASH ENCLOSURE(S), SEE ARCH'L PLANS FOR DETAILS PVMT. STRIPING, TYP. BITUMINOUS MILL & OVERLAY, TYP. MATCH EXISTING SIDEWALK PER CITY STANDARDS, TYP. MATCH EXISTING CURB, TYP. PROPERTY LINE BITUMINOUS MILL & OVERLAY 5 . 0 ' 1 2 . 0 ' 6.0' 16.0' 21.4 ' 4.0 ' R80.0 R4.0 8 . 5 ' 8.5 ' FULL BIT. PVMT. RECONSTRUCT, TYP, SEE FINAL GEOTECH FOR THICKNESS MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT, TYP. VALLEY GUTTER. SEE DETAIL. VALLEY GUTTER. SEE DETAIL. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, INCL. SIGNAGE, STRIPING AND RAMPS. SEE DETAIL. BUILDING STOOP. 16.7' 1 2 . 0 ' BUILDING OVERHANG OUTDOOR PATIO SEATING AREA. SEE ARCH'L PLANS 1 8 . 0 ' 1 8 . 0 ' BUILDING STOOP. BUILDING OVERHANG CONC. WALK TYP. 8 . 5 ' R 4 2 . 0 6 . 0 '8.0' BIG BLOCK RETAINING WALL, TYP. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATION AGAINST WALL. INC'L FENCE ATOP WALL & DRAIN TILE BEHIND WALL. SHOP DRAWINGS REQ'D. 14.0' 5'X6' RELOCATED CONC. TRANSFORMER/UTILITY PAD POTENTIAL LOCATION SERVING EXISTING MULTI-TENET BUILDING. COORD. FINAL SIZING & LOCATION WITH MECH'L & UTILITY CO. BIG BLOCK RETAINING WALL, TYP. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ELEVATION AGAINST WALL. INC'L FENCE ATOP WALL & DRAIN TILE BEHIND WALL. SHOP DRAWINGS REQ'D. PYLON STYLE MONUMENT SIGN. POTENTIAL LOCATION. COORDINATE FINAL SIZE & LOCATION W/ SIGN VENDOR & OWNER SITE LIGHTING POTENTIAL LOCATION COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION / SIZE / TYPE / FIXTURE COUNT W/ LIGHTING PLAN., TYP. SITE LIGHTING POTENTIAL LOCATION COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION / SIZE / TYPE / FIXTURE COUNT W/ LIGHTING PLAN., TYP. B612 C&G B612 C&G B612 C&G PVMT. STRIPING. R 3 7 . 0 CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE DETAIL TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING SPACES 78 BOTH PARCELS R8. 0 R 3 0 . 0 R15.0 R4.0 R1 5 . 0 R1 0 . 0 1 8 . 0 ' 2 4 . 0 ' 9 . 0 ' 3 3 . 0 ' 3 6 . 1 ' 2 4 . 0 ' 3 5 . 0 ' 2 4 . 0 ' 8.5' 1 0 . 7 ' 1 0 . 8 ' 1 1 . 0 ' PROPERTY LINE 4 . 0 ' 7.2' RECIPROCAL CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT FOR TRASH ENCLOSURES ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES(2) POTENTIAL LOCATION W/ CHARGING EQUIP. & SIGNAGE. COORD. W/ ELECT'L PLANS. PROPOSED EASEMENTS UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER THE EXISTING PROPERTY IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED PROPERTY A SHARED ACCESS & PARKING EASEMENT WILL BE RECORDED AGAINST BOTH PROPERTIES 8 WAYFINDING SIGN FOR CHIPOTLE. POTENTIAL LOCATION. COORD. W/ OWNER & SIGN VENDOR 5 . 2 ' 5 . 9 ' 87.0' 6 . 6 ' 7 . 9 ' 4 0 . 9 ' 6 . 1 ' 12.0' R3 . 0 R8 . 0 R2 7 . 0 4.0' 8.5'1 8 . 0 ' R8.0 R3 . 0 R3.0 R3 . 0 R4.0R3.0 R4.0 RELOCATED PYLON STYLE MONUMENT SIGN.(FIRESTONE) POTENTIAL LOCATION. COORDINATE FINAL SIZE & LOCATION W/ SIGN VENDOR & OWNER JIMMY JOHNS DRIVE-THRU PICKUP WINDOW JIMMY JOHNS DRIVE-THRU ORDER BOARD BIKE RACKS. HOOP STYLE. SEE DETAIL ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING SPACES(2) POTENTIAL LOCATION W/ CHARGING EQUIP. & SIGNAGE. COORD. W/ ELECT'L PLANS. 6'X3' CONC. TRANSFORMER/UTILITY PAD POTENTIAL LOCATION SERVING CHIPOTLE BUILDING. COORD. FINAL SIZING & LOCATION WITH MECH'L & UTILITY CO. NO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGNAGE VALLEY GUTTER. SEE DETAIL. BEGIN & END THICKENED EDGE C&G, SEE DETAIL & GRADING PLAN. MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT, TYP. CROSSWALK STRIPING SEE DETAIL, TYP. CROSSWALK STRIPING SEE DETAIL, TYP. PED RAMP SEE DETAIL, TYP. Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 7/7/2025 CITY SUBMITTAL SET 8/7/2025 CITY RESUBMITTAL PC 8/19/2025 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL 8/22/2025 CITY RESUBMITTAL DRAWN BY JR, DK REVIEWED BY PS PROJECT MANAGER PATRICK SARVER PROJECT NUMBER 23456.01 CH I P O T L E K N O L L W O O D 85 3 0 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 7 S T . L O U I S P A R K , M N 5 5 4 2 6 LI N D S A Y - K N O L L W O O D 2 , L L C 34 5 0 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 0 1 , M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 3 4 5 48776 David J. Knaeble LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/22/2025 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION C2.0 SITE PLAN OWNER INFORMATION LINDSAY-KNOLLWOOD OUTLOT, LLC 3450 COUNTY ROAD 101 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55345 JONATHAN LINDSAY 612-747-3030 JLINDSAY@LINDSAYGROUP.COM SITE LAYOUT NOTES: SITE PLAN LEGEND: TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY PROPERTY LINE CURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLAN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS TO CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. SIGNAGE WILL BE APPROVED THROUGH A SEPARATE SIGN PERMIT. PROJECT MAY HAVE UP TO 200 SF OF SIGNAGE WITH A MAXIMUM OF 100 SF FOR ONE SIGN FACE AND MAX HEIGHT OF 25 FT FOR A PYLON SIGN. 2. PROPOSED PYLON SIGNAGE ON THE CHIPOTLE SITE CANNOT BE USED FOR SIGNAGE FOR THE BUSINESSES ON THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY. SIGNAGE FOR THAT PROPERTY MUST BE LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY ITSELF. 3. OUTDOOR LIGHTING FIXTURES TO HAVE DIMMING CONTROL SYSTEM OR DIMMING DRIVERS TO MEET CITY CODE OF 1.0 Fc AVERAGE BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 10PM AND 6AM. ACCESSIBILITY ROUTE ARROW (IF APPLICABLE) DO NOT PAINT. 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. 4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS & ELEVATIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. 6. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 7. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. 9. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL. 10. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. 11. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL. 12. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 14. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. 15. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 16. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP. 17. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS. 18. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. 19. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO INSTALL ANY SIDEWALK AND CURBING PER DESIGN PLAN. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL CURBS AND SIDEWALKS WILL DRAIN PROPERLY IN FIELD CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR MUST CONTACT THE CIVIL ENGINEER 24-HOURS PRIOR TO ANY CURB AND/OR SIDEWALK INSTALLATION TO REVIEW AND INSPECT CURB STAKES. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CURB OR SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT IF THIS PROCEDURE IS NOT FOLLOWED. CONCRETE PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE) AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & CONCRETE DEPTHS, WITHIN ROW SEE CITY DETAIL, WITHIN PRIVATE PROPERTY SEE CSG DETAIL OPERATIONAL NOTES SNOW REMOVAL ALL SNOW SHALL BE STORED ON-SITE OUTSIDE PARKING LOT. WHEN FULL, REMOVAL CO. SHALL REMOVE EXCESS OFF-SITE. TRASH REMOVAL TRASH SHALL BE PLACED IN EXTERIOR TRASH AREA AND REMOVED BY COMMERCIAL CO. WEEKLY. DELIVERIES DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR AT THE FRONT DOOR VIA STANDARD COMMERCIAL DELIVERY VEHICLES (UPS, FED-EX, USPS). 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (IF APPLICABLE). SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. BITUMINOUS MILL & OVERLAY City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 25 8500 - 8520 STATE HIGHWAY NO. 7 8 5 3 0 S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 7 ITEM 1 4 I T E M 1 6 P A R C E L 1 P A R C E L 2 ITEM 1 4 IT E M 1 6 N O P A R K I N G N OPA R K I N G STATE HIGH W A Y 7 37,500 AADT ( 2 0 1 9 ) A Q U I L A A V E S 4, 0 0 0 A A D T ( 2 0 2 0 ) 37TH STREE T W CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS 1 - CP 1 - CP 1 - GC 1 - OV 8 - HJ2 1 - OV4 - LR 1 - AL 4 - AB5 5 - PN3 4 - CA3 3 - SS2 3 - PN3 3 - ZA 5 - AB5 8 - LR 3 - CA3 1 - AR2 1 - PS 5 - PF 7 - LR 4 - PF 4 - LR 1 - AJ2.5 1 - AL 1 - AJ2.5 6 - AB5 3 - SH3 5 - AB5 5 - DS 4 - DS 4 - IA 1 - GC 1 - PS 1 - AE 1 - AR2 4 - PF 5 - PF 4 - HJ2 3 - AB5 SYMBOL QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME SIZE GROUND COVERS 829 sf Rock Maintanence Strip / Rock Maintanence Strip 1"- 3" Washed river rock, uniform in size over filter fabric, composed of round rocks that may be varied in color. Include aluminum edging as shown on plan, or as needed. See detail. Mulch 3,791 sf Blue Grass Based / Sod Commercial grade, locally grown, well rooted sod blend of improved Kentucky Bluegrass w/ uniform color, leaf texture, density and varieties consisting of a minimum of two and no more than four common cultivars. Sod PLANT SCHEDULE: GROUND COVERS L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture 5000 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c PR O J E C T PRELIMINARY: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2025 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 7/7/2025 CITY SUBMITTAL SET 8/7/2025 CITY RESUBMITTAL PC 8/19/2025 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL 8/22/2025 CITY RESUBMITTAL DRAWN BY JR, DK REVIEWED BY PS PROJECT MANAGER PATRICK SARVER PROJECT NUMBER 23456.01 CH I P O T L E K N O L L W O O D 85 3 0 S T A T E H I G H W A Y 7 S T . L O U I S P A R K , M N 5 5 4 2 6 LI N D S A Y - K N O L L W O O D 2 , L L C 34 5 0 C O U N T Y R O A D 1 0 1 , M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 3 4 5 24904 Patrick J. Sarver LICENSE NO.DATE I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 08/22/2025 1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONLY PLANT MATERIAL FREE OF NEONICOTINOID BASED INSECTICIDES AND/OR TREATMENTS OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING BY NOT LIMITED TO IMIDACLOPRID (CONFIDOR, ADMIRE, GAUCHO, ADVOCATE), THIAMETHOXAM (ACTARA, PLATINUM, CRUISER), CLOTHIANIDIN (PONCHO, DANTOSU, DANTOP), ACETAMIPRID (MOSPILAN, ASSAIL, CHIPCOTRISTAR), THIACLOPRID (CALYPSO), DINOTEFURAN (STARKLE, SAFARI, VENOM), AND NITENPYRAM (CAPSTAR, GUARDIAN). 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL CERTIFY, THROUGH SUPPLIERS POLICY STATEMENT OR AFFIDAVIT, THAT NO NEONICOTINOID BASED INSECTICIDES HAVE BEEN USED ON SITE OR DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO THE GROWING OR STORAGE PLOTS OF THE SUPPLIED PLANT MATERIAL, INCLUDING THE PLANTING OF AGRICULTURAL (OR OTHER) SEED TREATED WITH NEONICS.. POLLINATOR SAFE PLANT MATERIAL: LANDSCAPE NOTES: PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES DECORATIVE BOULDERS (ROUNDED & BLOCK STYLE), 18"-30" DIA. LANDSCAPE PLAN LEGEND: EDGING - SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE, 4" DEPTH ALUMINUM, BLACK OR DARK GREEN IN COLOR, INCLUDE ALL CONNECTORS, STAKES, & ALL APPURTENANCES PER MANUF. INSTALL PER MANUF. INSTRUC./SPECS. SEE SHEET L1.1 FOR PLANTING SCHEDULE SEE SHEET LT1.0 FOR EXTERIOR LIGHTING PLAN PLANTING SEASON SCHEDULE SEASON CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS REMARKS SPRING PLANTING APRIL 15 - JUNE 15 APRIL 15 - JUNE 15 FALL PLANTING AUGUST 21 - SEPTEMBER 30 AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 15 NOTE: ADJUSTMENTS TO PLANTING DATES MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CONSTRUCTION LIMITS REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 0 1" = 20'-0" 20'-0"10'-0" N Know what's below. before you dig.Call R MULCH SCHEDULE AREA MULCH TYPE EDGING FABRIC REMARKS TREE RINGS 4" DEPTH, SHREDDED CEDAR YES NO SEE DETAIL SHT. L1.1 PLANTING BEDS ROCK MULCH, SEE LEGEND YES NO MAINT. STRIP AT BUILDING FOUNDATION ROCK MULCH, SEE LEGEND YES YES NOTE: COORDINATE ALL MULCH AND PLANTING BED MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, PROVIDE SAMPLES AND SHOP DRAWINGS/PHOTOS/DATA SHEETS OF ALL MATERIALS 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. REFERENCE MULCH SCHEDULE FOR MULCH MATERIALS AND LOCATIONS. 3. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CEDAR MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 4. IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 6. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 7. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR TWO (2) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 8. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 6" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 9. COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 10. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 11. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 12. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 13. PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INCLUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS: CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. PARKING ISLANDS SHALL BE PREPARED WITH CLEAN SOIL TO A DEPTH OF 5 FEET AND IMPROVED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE DRAINAGE, NUTRIENT AND MOISTURE-RETENTION LEVELS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF PLANTINGS. (EXCEPT WHERE THIS CONFLICTS WITH UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SUCH AS THE UNDERGROUND STORM WATER BASIN.) 2. ALL PLANTING BEDS OUTSIDE OF PARKING ISLANDS WITH TREES SHOULD HAVE AT LEAST 2 FEET DEPTH OF CLEAN TOPSOIL FILL WITH DIMENSIONS TO ACCOMMODATE 54 CU. FT OF TOPSOIL. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 26 FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. BRICK WALL 118' - 8" TRUSS BEARING 111' - 10" PREFINISHED BLACK METAL COPING, TYP. RUNNING BOND THIN BRICK, COLOR MATCH TO PPG 'PEGASUS' HOLLOW METAL SERVICE DOOR FRAME. PAINT DOOR AND FRAME BLACK DOOR BELL EXTERIOR ROOF LADDER WITH LOCKING GATE PAINTED BLACK T.O. PARAPET (LOW) 115' - 8" MASONRY CONTROL JOINT, TYP. STACKED BOND THIN BRICK SECURITY CAMERA FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" B.O. EIFS 110' - 0" T.O. BRICK WALL 118' - 8" T.O. STOREFRONT 109' - 0" TRUSS BEARING 111' - 10"RUNNING BOND THIN BRICK, COLOR MATCH TO PPG 'PEGASUS' BLACK ALUMINUM STOREFRONT ENTRY DOORS, WOOD HANDLES BY TENANT MILLWORK SUPPLIER NOTE: SIGNAGE IS SHOWN ONLY FOR PLACEMENT AND SCALE. ALL SIGNAGE FOR REVIEW UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT, NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT SET. A-3 SIGN COORDINATE BLOCKING FOR SIGN W/ SIGN VENDOR MASONRY CONTROL JOINT PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL TO COLOR MATCH STOREFRONT PREFINISHED BLACK METAL COPING, TYP. PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY TO COLOR MATCH STOREFRONT XXXX 6" VINYL ADDRESS LETTERS, LOCATION AND COLOR TO BE SPECIFIED BY THE FIRE MARSHAL BLACK ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM, TYP. T.O. ROOF (HIGH) 117' - 3" PREFINISHED BLACK RIBBED METAL PANEL PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY TO COLOR MATCH STOREFRONT STACKED THIN BRICK FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" B.O. EIFS 110' - 0" T.O. BRICK WALL 118' - 8" T.O. STOREFRONT 109' - 0" TRUSS BEARING 111' - 10" PREFINISHED BRAKE METAL TO COLOR MATCH STOREFRONT BLACK ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM, TYP. PREFINISHED BLACK METAL COPING, TYP. RUNNING BOND THIN BRICK, COLOR MATCH TO PPG 'PEGASUS' CONCRETE CURB MASONRY CONTROL JOINT, TYP. PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY TO COLOR MATCH STOREFRONT T.O. ROOF (HIGH) 117' - 3" T.O. PARAPET (LOW) 115' - 8" STACKED BOND THIN BRICK BEYOND FINISHED FLOOR 100' - 0" T.O. BRICK WALL 118' - 8" TRUSS BEARING 111' - 10" PREFINISHED BLACK METAL COPING, TYP PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY TO COLOR MATCH STOREFRONT SECURITY CAMERA BLACK ALUMINUM PASS-THRU WINDOW WITH INTEGRATED INTERIOR AIR CURTAIN T.O. ROOF (HIGH) 117' - 3" T.O. PARAPET (LOW) 115' - 8" PREFINISEHD BLACK FLUSH METAL PANELS STACKED BOND THIN BRICK OUTLINE OF WALLS AND ROOF BEYOND NOTE: SIGNAGE IS SHOWN ONLY FOR PLACEMENT AND SCALE. ALL SIGNAGE FOR REVIEW UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT, NOT PART OF THIS PERMIT SET. AW-3 SIGN COORDINATE BLOCKING FOR SIGN W/ SIGN VENDOR OVERFLOW WITH COVER 14' - 0 3/8"3' - 0"10' - 8"3' - 0"20' - 0"3' - 0"20' - 8" 1' - 6 1 / 2 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0"9' - 0"8' - 7 3/8"8' - 7 3/8" SEAL SHEET NUMBER: REVISION DATE ISSUE DATE TITLE: PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT INFORMATION CLIENT CONSULTANT J. LINDSAY THE LINDSAY GROUP, LLC 3450 COUNTY ROAD 101 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55345 © C O P Y R I G H T W I L K U S A R C H I T E C T S NOT F O R CON S T R U C T I O N A301 2025-0210 SAS HW Y 7 & A Q U I L A ST . L O U I S P A R K , M N 5 5 4 2 6 KN O L L W O O D SH E L L B U I L D I N G EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EXT ELEV GENERAL NOTES 1. REFER TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS THIS SHEET FOR EXTERIOR SIGNAGE LOCATIONS, SIZES & DESCRIPTIONS. 2. EXTERIOR SIGNAGE PROVIDED BY TSV AND INSTALLED BY TSV. GC TO MAKE FINAL CONNECTION. 1/4" = 1'-0"A301 EXT ELEV - WEST4 1/4" = 1'-0"A301 EXT ELEV - EAST3 1/4" = 1'-0"A301 EXT ELEV - NORTH1 1/4" = 1'-0"A301 EXT ELEV - SOUTH2 EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE FINISH MATERIAL COLOR REMARKS BR-1 STACKED THIN BRICK SIENNA IRONSPOT BR-2 RUNNING BOND THIN BRICK MATCH PT-1 MTL-1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING MATCH PT-1 TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH MTL-2 PREFINISHED METAL COPING MATCH PT-2 TO MATCH ADJACENT FINISH PT-1 PAINT PPG #1010-1 "PEGASUS" PT-2 PAINT PPG #1001-6 "KNIGHT'S ARMOR" City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 27 Planning commission August 20, 2025 6:00 p.m. Planning commission DRAFT Minutes Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha (arrived 6:03 p.m.), Matt Eckholm, Sylvie Hyman, Sara Strain, Tom Weber, John Flanagan Members absent: none Staff present: Katelyn Champoux, Laura Chamberlain, Gary Morrison Guests: J Lindsay, applicant; Patrick Sarver from Civil Site Group 1.Call to order – roll call. 2.Approval of minutes – Feb. 5, 2025, March 19, 2025, April 16, 2025, May 7, 2025, June 18, 2025, and July 16, 2025. It was moved by Commissioner Beneke, seconded by Commissioner Weber, to approve the Feb. 5, 2025, March 19, 2025, April 16, 2025, May 7, 2025, June 18, 2025, and July 16, 2025 minutes as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 3.Hearings. 3a. Title: Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits Location: 8528 Highway 7, 8530 Highway 7 Applicant: Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC Case No: 25‐03‐CP, 25‐04‐CUP Ms. Champoux presented the report. Ms. Champoux noted the applicant, Lindsay Knollwood 2, LLC applied for a comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permit for the proposed development at 8528 Hwy. 7, along with a separate conditional use permit for the existing commercial development at 8530 Hwy. 7.She stated the applicant proposes development of a Chipotle restaurant with a drive‐through lane for pick up orders only on a vacant property formerly owned by MNDOT. Commissioner Weber noted the easement from MNDOT and asked if this was always developable. Ms. Champoux stated the property was previously used for an onramp to Highway 7 from Aquila Ave S and MNDOT retained a highway easement over the property after the ramp was removed making it undevelopable. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 28 Draft minutes Planning commission meeting Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Hyman stated that access will be restricted at Hwy. 7 and Aquila Ave., and there was no mention in the report of bicycle or pedestrian access to the site. She asked how pedestrians and bikers will get to the site if not in a vehicle. Ms. Champoux stated there are existing sidewalks along 37th St. and Aquila Ave., along with a sidewalk that connects to the site, as well as pedestrian ways within the site. Chair Divecha asked about the entrance. Ms. Champoux stated it is in the northern corner of the building. Chair Divecha pointed out the closest parking and sidewalk to the building on the map. She asked if there was another entrance. Ms. Champoux stated she was not certain. Commissioner Strain asked if there were any concerns for the traffic flow with drive‐throughs for both Chipotle and Jimmy John's. Ms. Champoux stated that staff looked at potential circulation issues on the site. She stated there is data from another Chipotle with a similar pick‐ up lane showing a maximum queue length of seven (7) cars. The site plan for the proposed project shows the drive‐through lane can accommodate eight (8) cars without blocking drive aisles in the parking lot. Given this information, staff felt comfortable with the drive‐through lane and felt it would not result in further backup into the parking area. Commissioner Flanagan stated his concern is around the traffic pinch point on the east side near the entrance to Jimmy John's. He stated it seems there will be a lot of traffic on the site: vehicle traffic to and from both drive throughs and pedestrian traffic to and from vehicles or to and from the sidewalk. He asked if staff have any concerns around this high volume of traffic through the entrance to the front of the building. Ms. Champoux stated the alternative routes through the site and the expansion of the drive aisle adjacent to the Jimmy John’s drive through should provide for a better flow through the site. She stated, however, that Commissioner Flanagan brings up a valid point and that with all the information and data provided, staff found the site circulation acceptable. Commissioner Beneke stated that it is already tough to turn left into that driveway. He asked if the applicant ever wanted to convert to a full drive‐through; would another special permit be required. Ms. Champoux stated it will be a condition of approval that the pickup lane cannot convert to a full drive‐through with in‐vehicle sales. Commissioner Weber noted a building approved in the parking lot across the street from Costco a year ago that was also going to include a Chipotle. He asked if this was referred to earlier and if this will still be built. Ms. Champoux stated it has not been built yet, noting financing challenges with that site. Ms. Chamberlain added that the Park Place East site approvals are still valid for planning, and the city did receive building permits, but those applications have expired. Page 29 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Draft minutes Planning commission meeting Aug. 20, 2025 Chair Divecha asked if the data was gathered from this other Chipotle site. Ms. Champoux stated it was developed by Chipotle themselves and was from a study done in Ohio. Chair Divecha asked if there are any doubts or concerns about this project meeting all the conditions to the fullest extent. Ms. Champoux stated that it does meet the requirements and noted the staff had no doubts about that. Chair Divecha opened the public hearing. Mr. Sarver, the developer, answered questions for the commission. Commissioner Hyman stated her biggest concern at Knollwood is the small space where the building is and where parked cars will be. She stated there is one spot along the walkway in front of the building where there is only 5 feet and 2 inches between the building and the curb, and added she is concerned about vehicles and trucks that may back into spots and take up an entire space on the sidewalk where pedestrians will be walking. She asked if there is any thought to making that area bigger or having a barrier there, so cars do not impede pedestrians. Mr. Sarver stated that the 5 feet 2 inches is measured to the back of the curb, and where cars will be stopping and parking is at 8 feet, so it is a 6‐foot offset from the face of the building to the face of the curb. He added that they pushed the entire building south a bit to accommodate the optimal parking solution. Commissioner Hyman stated that 5 feet is not sufficient for pedestrian space. She stated that two people walking there and holding items will be cramped in the space. She added that the disabled parking is on the east side and bike parking on the west side of the building, which shows no curb cut is concerning. Mr. Sarver stated there will be curb cuts at all sidewalk locations, but added they are not shown on the detailed graphic. Mr. Sarver pointed out where curb cuts and ramps will be on the diagram. He added that they can add another accessible ramp if needed. Commissioner Hyman stated her main concern is that people with bicycles do not have to push their bikes onto the curb to get to bike parking. Mr. Sarver stated he understood and asked if she had a suggestion as to where she would like additional access or an alternative location to the bike parking. Commissioner Hyman stated that the space between the building and the parking is too small for both bikes and pedestrians, and that is her concern. She stated that having additional bike parking would also be helpful. Mr. Sarver stated they are meeting the city’s requirement for bike parking. Page 30 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Draft minutes Planning commission meeting Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Eckholm stated some of the nuances of the curb cuts are lost in the diagram, and he asked if some of the nuance of the pedestrian access is also lost, and if there will be some kind of painted or raised pathway for pedestrian access. He stated his main concern is the two‐ way driveway up to the Jimmy John’s drive‐up, and noted he has tried to figure out how to cross safely here, but is not entirely clear on how to do so. Mr. Sarver stated one opportunity is the short walk connection from the Aquila sidewalk and added they could certainly add a painted sidewalk there, with an extension to the sidewalk also. Commissioner Eckholm stated that it would be helpful for both pedestrians and drivers to know where pedestrians will be walking. Mr. Sarver stated he agreed. Commissioner Flanagan noted the traffic pinch point and the traffic backup at the Jimmy John’s drive‐through, along with pedestrians trying to find the entrance to Jimmy John's on the new walkway. Mr. Sarver stated the existing conditions are about 8 feet narrower, and there is about 36 feet of curb between the Jimmy John’s pick‐up window and the parking spaces in front of Chipotle. He added that it is 24 feet wide drive aisle, which allows two‐way traffic and minimizes the amount the pedestrian has to cross, especially with crosswalks added. He added that this expansion will help facilitate efficient movement, as well as a striped line to indicate the Jimmy John’s drive‐through. Commissioner Flanagan stated he is not a traffic expert, but still feels this is a congested area of concern. Mr. Sarver addressed the exit from the parking lot to the northeast, and Commissioner Flanagan agreed with that option. Commissioner Weber asked if there was ever any consideration for a one‐way loop to enter and exit the area. Mr. Sarver stated they did consider that, but thought it would have negative implications to users in the 8350 Building, noting counterclockwise feels like the natural progression. Chair Divecha asked where food deliveries come in. Mr. Sarver stated they come in the same way as customers. They will use the rear service door of Chipotle. Commissioner Strain asked if Chipotle model is moving away from in‐house orders and drive‐ through orders toward mobile orders with pick up windows only. Mr. Sarver stated yes, that is correct. He added orders will be done via the app only, with parking available if there is a delay and the order is brought to the customer by an employee. Page 31 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Draft minutes Planning commission meeting Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Strain asked about the trash enclosure and if all the buildings on that site will share the same enclosure. Mr. Sarver stated yes, they will all share the trash enclosure location. Commissioner Strain noted a space between the trash enclosure and asked if there is a tree in that area, noting she wants to be sure all trees are planted where they are supposed to be. Mr. Sarver stated that the tree she is referring to on the plan is from an earlier version and is not accurate, and that the plan has not yet been updated. Chair Divecha asked if there is a wait at the drive‐through, and if the customer has to park, will staff walk the order out to the customer. Mr. Sarver stated that it is correct. Chair Divecha stated that there should be safety considerations for staff crossing the parking lot to deliver orders to cars. Mr. Sarver stated they worked at length with Chipotle on this and stated that they were comfortable with the proximity between the building and cars. He stated he will address that again with Chipotle. Mr. Lindsay stated they do know when there are backups and added that there have been no issues since COVID at the Jimmy John’s with backup. He stated that having a robust lane into the site will be helpful, and the parking spots will be bigger and more to code. He added that there is an adjustment that can be made related to curb cuts. He thanked the staff and commissioners for their work and feedback. Chair Divecha closed the public hearing. Commissioner Eckholm stated the comments and context given by Mr. Lindsay were helpful with the Jimmy John’s entrance concerns. He added he appreciated the openness to feedback and discussion with the applicant and developer this evening. Commissioner Weber added he appreciates all the discussion as well and noted the backup is from the order window. He noted that in the future, maybe Jimmy John’s will move to one vs. two windows. Commissioner Flanagan agreed and thanked all for the conversation. He added that the developers' openness to making some changes to the entrance and adding some traffic calming in the future will also be helpful. He noted he is comfortable with the plan. Chair Divecha thanked the applicants for their willingness to take feedback. She stated she does not have concerns because people can still enter both restaurants and make a choice. She noted that more car‐centric businesses are not something she typically supports, but in this case, stated she will vote yes because this is congruent with city planning and code that exists today. She stated later this could be a discussion about allowing this, and added this is located at Knollwood Mall, which is vehicle‐centric. Page 32 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Draft minutes Planning commission meeting Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Strain agreed and noted that this area is very car‐centric. She added that with the mobile app, there is no point of sales with less stalling and less idling, which are valid concerns from the public. She stated hopefully the amount of time spent in the drive‐through is reduced because it can be timed vs. other fast‐food entities. Commissioner Beneke added that in any other site in the city, he would not like this at all. He stated he does worry about the traffic in this area, though, and noted there was no discussion about street traffic, while turning left into the lot is a bit of a concern for him. Commissioner Hyman stated she is not comfortable with the plans as presented, and approving this will leave the door open for safety concerns. She noted a woman was killed in 2024 at Knollwood Mall, and she would like to see more safety implemented in the mall before moving forward with further investment in the area. She stated she would like to see the safety improvements displayed visually in a way that would prove they are going to happen before she approves of this plan. Commissioner Flanagan asked what the options are for adding more safety features to the plan. Ms. Champoux stated that the planning commission has the option of tabling the motion to a later planning commission meeting and having new site plans presented. It was moved by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Eckholm, to approve the Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use of a portion of 8528 Hwy. 7 from ROW to COM; and to approve a conditional use permit for in-vehicle service and the use of off-site and shared parking for 8528 Hwy. 7 with conditions and to recommend rescinding the special permit and approval of a conditional use permit for 8530 Hwy 7 to allow in-vehicle sales and service and more than one principal building on the site. The motion passed 6-1 (Commissioner Hyman opposed). 4. Other Business. 4a. Election of officers. Ms. Chamberlain explained that the Chair and Vice Chair will be voted on at tonight’s meeting and will serve from the October 2025 meeting through the May 2026 meeting. Commissioner Weber asked if the term has changed from the regular calendar year from January to December. Ms. Chamberlain stated this is in line with the new requirements of board and commission terms. She added that if commissioners have served in the past, they can also serve again. She also stated that staff will provide training as needed for officers. Commissioner Hyman stated she would be interested, but is going to be running for the city council election. Page 33 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Draft minutes Planning commission meeting Aug. 20, 2025 Commissioner Flanagan stated he would be open to being chair. Commissioner Strain stated she would be comfortable as vice chair, but not chair, since she is new to the commission. Commissioner Flanagan and Commissioner Strain nominated themselves for Chair and Vice Chair, respectively. The commissioners approved of their nominations. Chair Divecha stated that being chair has been a pleasure and noted that much was accomplished this year, and the staff and the rest of the commission are very supportive and helpful. She asked if staff could do a training refresher on Robert’s Rules for the entire commission. Ms. Chamberlain stated that yes, that can be scheduled. 5.Communications. Ms. Chamberlain stated the zoning survey will be completed this Sunday, August 24, and added that the Vision 4.0 survey is open until the end of September. Ms. Chamberlain also noted future scheduled meeting/event dates: •September 3, 2025 – planning commission study session •September 17, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting •October 8, 2025 – planning commission study session* •October 15, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting *Meeting held on October 8, 2025, since Yom Kippur is October 1 and 2, 2025 6. Adjournment – 7:15 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison John Flanagan, chair member Page 34 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 From: Marcus Green < Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 9:04 AM To: Katelyn Champoux <kchampoux@stlouisparkmn.gov> Subject: Public Input-8530 Highway 7 APPLICATION FOR COMPREHEINSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization_ Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe My name is Marcus Green and I'm a resident of St. Louis Park. I'm writing in to voice my opposition to the conditional use permit that will allow a drive thru at 8530 Highway 7. The public notice for this permit application reference<:! city code 36-33. Section 36-33 states that" A conditional use permit shall be issued when the following findings are made: (1) Consistency with plans. It is consistent with and supportive of principles, goals, objectives, land use designations, redevelopment plans, neighborhood objectives, and implementation strategies of the comprehensive plan." The comprehensive city plan summary references 5 commitments, one of which is Environmental Stewardship. The Environmental Stewardship section references the Climate Action Plan that the city council passed in 2017. One of the goals in that plan was to "Reduce vehicle emissions by 25 perc ent.'' Approving a new drive-thru would not only be in direct opposition to that stated goal but to the greater comprehensive plan. Additionally, here's a link to the Idling Reduction page on the St. Louis Park website. Idling Reduction I St. Louis Park, MN City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 35 St. Louis Park City Council SOOS Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 5S416 Dear SLP City Council, September 29, 2025 I am writing to you regarding the application submitted for the Chipotle restaurant drive-thru lane at Knollwood Mall. We are all aware that pick-up windows and food delivery services have become an integral part of our world and will only continue to grow for the sake of convenience and ease of life for all of us. However, rarely; are individuals with disabilities at the fore front of this conversation. As a lifelong advocate for the disability world, I have seen first-hand how service options like these can help support this population. For families with kids with very involved special needs, they are not able to do sit-down restaurants or grocery store trips together without the heavy support of others. They solely rely on food being delivered or being able to pick up food from the comfort of their cars. For individuals with mobility issues (physical, vision, etc), having to park, navigate various depths of perception, distance and so on. Something we able-bodied people often don't have to think about. These drive-up options provide for a better quality of life for individuals with disabilities. As a 22-year resident of this city and also an Executive Board member of the Hendrickson Foundation, where we seek to enrich the lives of individuals with disabilities and their families through the game of hockey, I am in total support of this proposal. Chipotle is a favorite among our athletes and provides healthy food options for them. If there is an option to help break down barriers for families, this is part of the solution. I hope you strongly consider this for our inclusive city. Thank you for your consideration, Sincerely, ck'�� Laura Meyer City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 36 www.CivilSiteGroup.com 5000 Glenwood Ave • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 (612) 615-0060 Memorandum TO: City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Attn: Katelyn Champoux, Associate Planner kchampoux@stlouisparkmn.gov 952.928.1375 FROM: Civil Site Group 5000 Glenwood Ave Golden Valley, MN 55422 Patrick Sarver Psarver@civilsitegroup.com (612)-615-0060 x 702 DATE: 09/22/2025 RE: Chipotle Knollwood – SL362209 – Narrative Addendum – CSG Proj No. 23456.01 City Staff & City Council, Thank you for your continued consideration of the Chipotle Knollwood Project. The following narrative addendum is intended to highlight the benefits the proposal offers related to environmental impacts, accessibility, and operational improvements over existing site conditions. It serves to provide more information regarding questions brought forth by city council. Additional insights from property ownership and a third-party traffic operations study have been incorporated below to support the project’s approval at the upcoming October 6th City Council meeting. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 37 www.CivilSiteGroup.com 5000 Glenwood Ave • Golden Valley • Minnesota • 55422 (612) 615-0060 Narrative Addendum Reduced Idling and Queue Impacts Compared to Conventional Drive-Thrus •The proposed Chipotlane is not a traditional drive thru. It is limited to online and mobile pick-up orders only. There is no order board or on-site payment. Customers only enter the lane after they receive a notification that their order is ready. •This design reduces average vehicle queue times and reduces idling emissions. •According to a Chipotlane GPD Group, November 2022, Operations Study of six high volume Chipotlane sites: o Queue lengths were 4 vehicles or fewer approximately 98% of the time and 2 vehicles on average. o Average service times were under 3 minutes. By contrast, traditional fast-food drive thrus average over 6 minutes Accessibility and Equity for Vulnerable Users •As stated in the ownership comments and confirmed by the Chipotle regional broker, advocacy from disabled community members has been a driving force behind the Chipotlane concept. •This mobile-only format allows users to remain in their vehicles, providing safe, barrier free access to healthy food, creating inclusivity and dignity of service for: o Community members with mobility limitations o Elderly residents o Parents with children o Immunocompromised or health sensitive individuals Environmental Enhancements and Stormwater Quality •The existing site currently drains untreated stormwater directly to Minnehaha Creek offering no water quality, or rate control (flooding) protection. •The proposed project will incorporate best-management practices to meet modern stormwater quality, volume control, and rate control standards. This will significantly improve downstream water quality. •In addition, the plan includes planting 15 new trees where none exist today, adding canopy cover and ecological value through urban cooling, biodiversity, and aesthetic improvement. Circulation, Safety, and Emergency Access Improvements •Drive aisles are widened, creating larger distances between the buildings and drive lanes. This opens up sight lines, creating a safer and more bike/pedestrian friendly complete development. •Improved organization of site traffic benefits emergency access and circulation for both the new and existing users and meets city code requirements. Enhanced Walkability and Lighting Compliance •The project design improves pedestrian circulation and walkability compared to current conditions. •New lighting will be installed to bring the site into compliance with city standards, enhancing nighttime safety for both pedestrians and drivers. Taken together, the project will not only modernize the site but also address environmental quality, accessibility, and safety concerns in ways that exceed the current condition. By reducing idling through an online-order drive-through, upgrading stormwater treatment, planting new trees, and improving walkability and circulation, the redevelopment will result in a net environmental and community benefit for St. Louis Park. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7a) Title: Resolutions authorizing Knollwood Chipotle comprehensive plan amendment and conditional use permits - Ward 3 Page 38 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Action agenda item: 7b Executive summary Title: First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to cannabinoid products Recommended action: Motion to approve the first reading amending sections of chapter 8 of the city code to be consistent with changes in state statute related to cannabinoids. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to amend sections of chapter 8 of the city code to be consistent with changes in state statute related to the licensing of cannabinoid products/LPHE (lower-potency hemp edibles)? Summary: Beginning Oct. 1, 2025, the Minnesota Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) will transition their registration program for LPHE retailers to a licensing program. At that time, the OCM will begin accepting applications for lower-potency hemp edible licenses including LPHE- retailers, LPHE-manufacturers and LPHE-wholesalers. All current LPHE businesses registered with the OCM who wish to continue selling LPHE products will be required to apply for and obtain a license under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 342. Operations for currently registered businesses may continue while their license is processed. As the OCM transitions to licensing, it is required that local governments register LPHE retailers. On March 17, 2025, the council passed an ordinance establishing cannabis and LPHE retail registration in preparation for the OCM’s transition to licensing. This ordinance amendment removes the city’s licensing requirement for LPHE to align with the OCM’s transition from registration to licensing of LPHE and the city’s transition from licensing to registration. If the first reading of the ordinance is approved, a second reading will be scheduled for Oct. 20, 2025. The effective date for the proposed change is 15 days following publication. Financial or budget considerations: The city’s current annual licensing fee is $855. The maximum allowable annual registration fee imposed by the city will now be set by the OCM at $125. This will reduce annual revenue to the city by approximately $17,500 based on 24 registrations. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion, draft ordinance amendment Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager Reviewed by: Karen Barton, building & energy interim director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7b) Page 2 Title: First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to cannabinoid products Discussion Background: On Nov. 21, 2022, the city council approved an ordinance regulating the retail sale of cannabinoid products (lower-potency hemp edibles). Per Sec. 8-471 (d) The city council found that a local regulatory system for Cannabinoid Product sellers is appropriate and not unduly burdensome to ensure that sellers comply with the state cannabis laws and business standards of the city to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the city’s youth and all residents. The city did not intend to inhibit the production, sale, or use of medical cannabis products. Present considerations: OCM currently requires retailers of LPHE to register their businesses with the state. Beginning Oct. 1, 2025, the OCM will end its registration program and begin licensing retailers of LPHE. Local municipalities are then required to register retailers of LPHE or delegate authority to the county. On March 17, 2025, the council passed an ordinance establishing cannabis and LPHE retail registration in preparation for the OCM’s transition to licensing. This amendment removes the city’s licensing requirement for LPHE to align with the OCM’s transition from registration to licensing of LPHE. Registered businesses selling hemp- derived cannabinoid products may continue sales until LPHE licenses are issued, at which point only lower-potency hemp edibles will be compliant. LPHE products may also be sold by businesses holding a license for cannabis retailer business, cannabis microbusiness with retail endorsement, cannabis mezzobusiness with retail endorsement, or a medical cannabis combination business with a retail endorsement. When the OCM’s hemp registration system ends, all currently registered businesses who wish to continue selling LPHE products will be required to apply for a license under Minnesota Statutes, chapter 342. In addition to an OCM-issued license and endorsement, LPHE retailer license holders must also obtain a retail registration from their local government before the business can begin retail sales. Local governments may charge an annual retail registration fee of up to $125 per location. Retail registrations may only be issued by the local government after a business receives a license from OCM, pays the local retail registration fee, and, if applicable, passes any preliminary compliance checks conducted by the local government and is found to be in good standing on any applicable property taxes and assessments. OCM requirements for local governments: • Local governments may not limit the number of local LPHE retail registrations. • Local governments may not prohibit the possession, transportation, or use of LPHEs in their jurisdictions. • Local governments are required to conduct annual compliance and age verification checks of LPHE-Retailers with a local retail registration. Financial considerations: Annual registration fee is set by the OCM at $125, previous licensing fee was $855. This will reduce annual revenue to the city by approximately $17,500 based on 24 registrations. Next steps: If the first reading of the ordinance is approved, a second reading will be scheduled for Oct. 20, 2025. The effective date for the proposed change is 15 days following publication. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7b) Page 3 Title: First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to cannabinoid products Ordinance No.____-25 Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8, Section 8-471 – 8-478 The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Subdivision XVI. Cannabinoid Products Sec. 8-471 – Sec. 8-478 are deleted in their entirety. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council , 2025 Kim Keller, city manager Attest: Nadia Mohamed, mayor Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First Reading October 6, 2025 Second Reading October 20, 2025 Date of Publication October 30, 2025 Date Ordinance takes effect November 14, 2025 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Action agenda item: 7c Executive summary Title: First reading of amendments to chapter 34 of the city code related to grass height Recommended action: Motion to approve the first reading amending various sections of chapter 34 of the city code to be consistent with changes in state statute and city code. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to proceed with the ordinance amendments proposed for property maintenance regulations? Summary: On Nov. 14, 2024, the council approved amending sections of city code increasing the maximum grass height on any public or private property from six inches to eight inches to align with changes in state statute. Recently, it has come to the attention of city staff that other chapters and sections of city code also reference maximum grass height but were not amended. This ordinance amends Sec. 34-111 (a) and (b) of city code to align with the council- approved amendments approved on Nov. 14, 2024. If the first reading of the ordinance is approved, a second reading will be scheduled for Oct. 20, 2025. The effective date for the proposed change is 15 days following publication. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Draft ordinance amendment Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager Reviewed by: Karen Barton, building & energy interim director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7c) Page 2 Title: First reading of amendments to chapter 34 of the city code related to grass height Ordinance No.____-25 Amending St. Louis Park City Code Section 34-111(a) & (b) relating to grass/weeds height The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Sec. 34-111. Weeds declared a nuisance, duty of owner. (a) Any weeds, whether noxious or not as defined by state law, or turf grass growing at a height greater than six eight inches upon any privately owned lot or tract of land in the city or upon any public boulevard or similar public property alongside the traveled portion of a street or alley abutting the private property are hereby declared to be a nuisance, except as authorized in Section 34-117. Turf grass is any type of vegetative grasses used for recreational or residential purposes. (b) The owner or occupant of any such property or abutting property shall prevent the nuisance, and if the nuisance occurs, the owner or occupant shall cut and remove the weeds from the property or cut the turf grass to a height of less than six eight inches. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council , 2025: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First Reading October 6, 2025 Second Reading October 20, 2025 Date of Publication October 30, 2025 Date Ordinance takes effect November 14, 2025 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Action agenda item: 7d Executive summary Title: First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to rental licensing Recommended action: Motion to approve the first reading amending chapter 8, section 8- 326(c) of the city code related to exceptions for licensing of non-owner occupied properties. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to proceed with an amendment to chapter 8, section 8-326(c) of the city code exempting relative homestead properties from non-owner occupied licensing requirements? Summary: At the April 21, 2025 study session, the city council expressed support for providing an exception for relative homestead properties from the rental licensing requirements. Staff shared that years of inspections show relative homestead properties are generally properly maintained, safe, and less likely to generate concerns by the occupants. Elimination of the city license, fee and inspection requirements for relative homestead properties alleviates the burden expressed by family members working to provide housing for college-age children, disabled adult family members, or parents passing titles to children during estate planning. If the first reading of the ordinance is approved, a second reading will be scheduled for Oct. 20, 2025. The effective date for the proposed change is Jan. 1, 2026. Financial or budget considerations: The potential impact of an exemption on licensing revenue is an estimated reduction of $13,500 annually. It is anticipated that the revenue change will likely be offset by new apartment construction and an increase in the number of rental units. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion, draft ordinance amendment Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager Reviewed by: Karen Barton, building & energy interim director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7d) Page 2 Title: First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to rental licensing Discussion Background: Many relative homestead property owners have questioned and expressed frustration during conversations with staff about rental licensing requirements. These concerns are often shared in situations such as purchasing a property for college-age children, housing provided for a disabled adult family member, or parents passing the title to their children during estate planning. Earlier in 2025, the council expressed support in moving forward with an amendment that adds relative homestead properties as an exception to the rental licensing requirements. Present considerations: Staff are supportive of providing an exemption for legally classified relative homestead dwelling units from the rental licensing requirements for non-owner occupied properties. After years of inspection experience, staff agree that relative homestead properties are generally properly maintained, safe, and not likely to generate concerns by the occupants. This would eliminate the need for a city license, which would in turn eliminate the fee and inspection requirements for these residential homes, condominiums and townhomes. The city currently licenses 60 relative homesteaded dwelling units, amounting to less than 0.5% of the city’s total licensed units. Considering the small number of units affected by adopting an exemption, no change in staffing or capacity would need to occur. A relative homestead classification would be required for the proposed licensing exception. To receive a relative homestead classification, the property owner must apply with Hennepin County and agree to the following as dictated by Minnesota Department of Revenue: “I certify that the above information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Minnesota Statutes, section 609.41, states that anyone giving false information in order to avoid or reduce their tax obligations is subject to a fine of up to $3,000 and/or up to one year in prison. This application must be signed by all owners who occupy the property or by the qualifying relative and returned to the county assessor to receive homestead on this property.” Financial considerations: The reduction in annual licensing revenue would amount to $13,500 and would be accounted for during the budget process. The revenue change will likely be largely offset with new apartment construction. Next steps: If the first reading of the ordinance is approved, a second reading will be scheduled for Oct. 20, 2025. The effective date for the proposed change is Jan. 1, 2026. City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7d) Page 3 Title: First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to rental licensing Ordinance No.____-25 Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8 Section 8-326(c) The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Subdivision VIII. Rental Housing Sec. 8-326. License required. (a) The owner of a residential building or portion thereof operated as rental housing with one or more dwelling units must obtain a rental housing license. The license shall contain a statement that the tenant or tenants may contact the attorney general for information regarding the rights and obligations of owners and tenants under state law. The statement shall include the telephone number and address of the attorney general. (b) The term “rental housing” means any dwelling unit that is not owner occupied. The term includes any dwelling unit which is either unoccupied or occupied by a relative of the owner. (c) Exceptions. No license shall be required under the following circumstances: (1) A dwelling unit occupied by the owner for a minimum of six months per calendar year. (2) Rented rooms within an owner-occupied dwelling unit. (3) Unoccupied dwelling units being offered for sale which have been issued a Certificate of Property Maintenance that remains in effect. (4) Certain group homes which are exempt by state statute from municipal rental licensing schemes. (5) Properties classified as relative homestead by Hennepin County. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2026. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council , 2025 Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor First Reading October 6, 2025 Second Reading October 20, 2025 Date of Publication October 30, 2025 Date Ordinance takes effect January 1, 2026 City council meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 7d) Page 4 Title: First reading of amendment to chapter 8 of the city code related to rental licensing Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Discussion item: 1 Executive summary Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Recommended action: None at this time. Policy consideration: None at this time. Summary: Based on guidance provided by city council members during the Feb. 3, 2025 special study session which was focused on establishing protocols for boards and commissions, it was decided to schedule regular check-ins between boards and commissions and the city council throughout the year. The Oct. 6, 2025, check-in will spotlight the Housing Authority represented by the current vice chair, Shelby Conway. The staff liaison to the Housing Authority is Marney Olson, Housing Manager. The Housing Authority is a statutory board established under Minnesota Statutes Sections 469.001 to 469.047 and City of St. Louis Park Resolution No. 1763-88. The city council has granted the Housing Authority the powers, responsibilities, and duties necessary to oversee, plan and implement housing programs for low- and moderate-income residents within the city. The discussion will cover an overview of the commission's approved work plan, including any completed tasks, ongoing projects and strategies for addressing unaddressed work plan items. Additionally, the discussion will include opportunities for council feedback, potential modifications or additions to the work plan, and any other relevant topics concerning the commission's activities. Later in October 2025, a boards and commissions check-in meeting is set to feature the Police Advisory Commission. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: 2025 Housing Authority approved workplan 2025 Housing Authority current roster Housing Authority Bylaws Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Board and Commission Annual work plan Approved by council: February 18, 2025 1 2025 work plan │ Housing Authority Board 1 Initiative name: Initiative type: ☒Staff support (review project, policy or program and provide feedback) ☐Independent research project ☐Gather community feedback ☐Lead community event Initiative origin: ☐Third party-initiated ☒Staff-initiated ☐Commission-initiated ☐Council-initiated Legally required (e.g. response to Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)? ☐Yes ☒No Commissioner lead(s) name(s): If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission: Is this an established work group? (if applicable) ☐Yes ☒No Initiative description: Support the citywide Vision 4.0 process by participating directly and/or encouraging others to participate, and by sharing information with other community members about the process. Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☒ Other ☐ N/A Target completion date: 3Q 2025 This section to be completed by staff: Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed Budget required: None Staff support required: Communication from staff liaison about opportunities with Vision 4.0 Liaison comments: Plan to keep the commission informed about opportunities to assist with the citywide Vision 4.0 process. HA staff will communicate Vision 4.0 opportunities to HA program participants/tenants. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 2 2 2 Initiative name: Initiative type: ☒Staff support (review project, policy or program and provide feedback) ☐Independent research project ☐Gather community feedback ☐Lead community event Initiative origin: ☒Third party-initiated ☒Staff-initiated ☐Commission-initiated ☐Council-initiated Legally required (e.g. response to Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)? ☒Yes ☐No Commissioner lead(s) name(s): If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission: Is this an established work group? (if applicable) ☐Yes ☐No Initiative description: Oversee the administration of the Housing Authority’s core federally funded rental assistance programs, city funded Kids in the Park program and county funded Stable Home Program. Oversight includes review and approval of program policies, ensuring sound fiscal policies and funding administration, approving the submission of competitive grant applications to secure new and renewal funding, review and approval of the HA budget, review and approval of the Annual PHA Plan prior to submitting to HUD, and review and approval of the 5-year capital improvement plan for the Public Housing Program. Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☒ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ N/A Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☒ Other ☐ N/A Target completion date: Ongoing This section to be completed by staff: Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed Budget required: None for oversight, but the board is responsible for oversight of the budget for all HA rental assistance programs. Staff support required: Prepare board reports and information on HUD or other program guidelines and requirements so the board can provide oversight of the programs. Liaison comments: Oversight of the Housing Authority’s rental assistance programs is the primary role of the HA board. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 3 3 3 Initiative name: Initiative type: ☒Staff support (review project, policy or program and provide feedback) ☐Independent research project ☐Gather community feedback ☐Lead community event Initiative origin: ☒Third party-initiated ☒Staff-initiated ☐Commission-initiated ☐Council-initiated Legally required (e.g. response to Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)? ☒Yes ☐No Commissioner lead(s) name(s): If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission: Is this an established work group? (if applicable) ☐Yes ☐No Initiative description: Provide direction and approve the Bring it Home state rental assistance program. Oversee the administration of the Bring it Home program once it is implemented. Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☒ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ N/A Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☒ Other ☐ N/A Target completion date: 12/31/2025 This section to be completed by staff: Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed Budget required: None for oversight, but the board will be responsible for oversight of the budget for the Bring it Home program. Staff support required: Prepare board reports and information on the requirements of the Bring it Home Program. Liaison comments: The Bring it Home rental assistance program RFP is anticipated to be due in March 2025. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 4 4 4 Initiative name: Initiative type: ☒Staff support (review project, policy or program and provide feedback) ☐Independent research project ☐Gather community feedback ☐Lead community event Initiative origin: ☐Third party-initiated ☒Staff-initiated ☐Commission-initiated ☐Council-initiated Legally required (e.g. response to Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)? ☐Yes ☒No Commissioner lead(s) name(s): If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission: Is this an established work group? (if applicable) ☐Yes ☐No Initiative description: Oversee the administration of programs that support or promote a well-maintained housing stock through the use of the city’s housing rehab and design programs and affordable homeownership programs including the first-generation and DPA programs. Review the housing activity report annually and provide feedback. Review and authorize the execution of contracts to administer these programs. Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☒ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ N/A Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A Target completion date: Ongoing This section to be completed by staff: Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed Budget required: None. The city council approves the budget for these programs. Staff support required: Prepare reports to the board. Liaison comments: Review any significant program changes with the board for their feedback, recommendations and approval. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 5 5 5 Initiative name: Initiative type: ☒Staff support (review project, policy or program and provide feedback) ☐Independent research project ☐Gather community feedback ☐Lead community event Initiative origin: ☐Third party-initiated ☒Staff-initiated ☐Commission-initiated ☒Council-initiated Legally required (e.g. response to Legislative changes or Judicial decisions)? ☐Yes ☒No Commissioner lead(s) name(s): If joint commission initiative, list other board or commission: Is this an established work group? (if applicable) ☐Yes ☒No Initiative description: When requested by council, provide input on strategies to promote the creation and preservation of affordable rental and homeownership options for low- and moderate-income households in St. Louis Park. Strategic Priority: ☐ 1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☒ 5 ☐ N/A Deliverable: ☐ Research report ☐ Summary of community input ☐ Other ☒ N/A Target completion date: Ongoing as requested This section to be completed by staff: Council request (if applicable): ☐ Review and comment or reply ☐ Review and decide ☒ Informational only – no response needed Budget required: None Staff support required: Provide information to the board on housing strategies or policies being considered by council. Liaison comments: Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 6 6 Initiative Origin Definitions •Third party-initiated – Project initiated by applicant or external agency (statutory boards) •Staff-initiated – Project initiated by staff liaison or other city staff •Commission-initiated – Project initiated by the board or commission •Council-initiated – Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council Strategic Priorities 1.St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. 2.St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. 3.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. 4.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. 5.St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement Modifications •Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways: •Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session. •If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city council approval at a council meeting. •The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 7 7 Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 8 Initiatives that are being considered by the board or commission but not proposed in the annual work plan. Council approval is needed if the board or commission decides they would like to amend a work plan. Initiative Comments Future ideas Current 2025 Housing Authority Roster Name Role Term Expires Thom Miller Chair May 31, 2029 Shelby Conway Vice Chair May 31, 2028 Jolene Tanner Regular Member May 31, 2030 Catherine Courtney Regular Member May 31, 2026 Vally Upsher Regular Member – Program Participant May 31, 2027 ^peĐial stuĚy session meeting oĨ KĐtoďer ϲ͕ 2025 ;/tem No͘ ϭͿ Title͗ oarĚs anĚ Commissions ĐheĐŬͲin ǁith Đity ĐounĐil͗ Housing Authority Wage ϵ Adopted October 27, 1970 (Res. 2) Amended January 8, 1974 (Res. 29) Amended May 28, 1974 (Res. 35) Amended November 26, 1974 (Res. 47) Amended March 13, 1984 (Res. 167) Amended November 13, 1984 Amended November 8, 1988 (Res. 273) Amended June 12, 1990 (Res. 305) Amended Aug. 13, 1991 (Res. 323) Amended Oct. 13, 1992 (Res. 348) Amended Jan. 11, 1994 (Res. 380) Amended Nov. 8, 1994 (Res. 396) Amended Aug. 12, 1997 (Res. 434) Amended July 2002 (Res. 507) Amended August 2006 (Res. 552) Amended December 2006 (Res. 553) Amended May 2010 (Res. 595) Amended June 2021 (Res. 715) BYLAWS HOUSING AUTHORITY St. Louis Park, Minnesota ARTICLE I‒THE AUTHORITY 1.1 Name of Authority. The name of the Authority shall be the "Housing Authority of St. Louis Park, Minnesota" which is referred to herein from time to time as “The Authority”. 1.2 Powers. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 469.001 to 469.047 and established by Resolution No. 1763-88, the City Council has vested powers, duties and obligations to the Authority for the purpose of managing, planning and implementing the City’s low and moderate income housing programs. The powers of the Authority shall be vested in the Commissioners thereof in office from time to time. 1.3 Responsibilities. The responsibilities of the Authority include, but shall not be limited to managing existing and future low and moderate income housing programs owned or operated by it within the City of St. Louis Park; planning and implementing housing programs primarily involving low and moderate income persons within the City; having the power to accept control and authority over any housing project or program for low Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 10 and moderate income persons which the Economic Development Authority delegates to the Authority; and levying special benefit taxes as authorized by law in furtherance of housing projects and programs for low and moderate income persons and those housing projects transferred to the Authority from the Economic Development Authority, subject to prior approval of the City Council. 1.4 Seal of Authority. The seal of the Authority shall be in the form of a circle and shall bear the name of the Authority and the year of its organization. ARTICLE II‒BOARD MEMBERSHIP 2.1 Appointment. All Board members are appointed by the City Council. Each vacancy in an unexpired term shall be filled for the remainder of the term for which the original appointment was made. One Board member appointment is reserved for a Housing Authority program participant. 2.2 Qualifications. Members must be St. Louis Park residents. The City Council will not consider applications for appointment to the Authority Board from regular full-time or part-time St. Louis Park employees as defined in the city’s personnel manual. 2.3 Reappointments. Reappointments are made as needed by the City Council. Performance and attendance by Board members requesting reappointment will be considered by the Council. Council may choose to re-interview any commission member to determine whether the commission member should continue to serve. A member may continue to serve beyond their expiration date until a reappointment is made. 2.4 Attendance. Regular attendance at meetings is a requirement for continued membership on the Board. Continued absenteeism is considered grounds for dismissal. 2.5 Performance of Duties. Commissioners are expected to adequately prepare for meetings. For inefficiency or neglect of duty, or misconduct in office, a commissioner may be removed by the governing body of the municipality. ARTICLE III‒OFFICERS 3.1 Officers. The officers of the Authority shall be Chair, Vice-Chair, Executive Director and Secretary. 3.2 Chair. The Chair shall preside at all meetings of the Authority. At each meeting the Chair shall submit such recommendations and information, as the Chair considers proper concerning the business, affairs and policies of the Authority. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 11 3.3 Vice-Chair. The Vice-Chair shall perform the duties of the Chair in the absence or incapacity of the Chair; and in case of the resignation or death of the Chair, the Vice- Chair shall perform such duties as are imposed on the Chair until such time as the Authority shall select a new Chair. 3.4 Secretary. The Secretary shall give proper notice of all meetings. The Secretary shall keep the seal, and shall affix the same to any instrument requiring it and shall attest the seal by the Secretary’s signature. The Secretary shall also be responsible for the minutes of all meetings and shall perform such other duties as the Authority shall prescribe. 3.5 Executive Director. The Executive Director shall be the City Manager of the City of St. Louis Park or a designee who shall have general supervision over the administration of its business and affairs, subject to the direction of the Authority. The Executive Director shall also be responsible for the finances of the Housing Authority and shall keep accurate accounts of all monies, drafts, and checks in the name of and to the credit of the Authority in such banks and depositories as a majority of the commissioners shall designate from time to time. The Executive Director shall have power to endorse for deposit all notes, checks, and drafts received by the Authority and to execute financial and budgetary reports for and on behalf of the Authority. 3.6 Additional Duties. The officers of the Authority shall perform such duties and functions as may from time to time be required by the Authority or the Bylaws or rules and regulations of the Authority. 3.7 Delegation of Duties. Officers may delegate duties and authority of their position to other personnel as deemed appropriate by the Officers of the Authority. ARTICLE IV‒ELECTION OR APPOINTMENT OF OFFICERS 4.1 Elections, Term of Office, and Qualifications. The Chair, Vice Chair, and Secretary shall be elected annually at the first regular meeting following the month of May. Such officers shall hold office for one year or until their successors are elected and qualified. 4.2 Vacancies. Should the office of Chair, Vice-Chair or Secretary become vacant, the Authority shall elect a successor from its membership at the next regular meeting, and such election shall be for the unexpired term of said office. ARTICLE V‒MEETINGS 5.1 Meetings. All meetings of the Authority will be conducted in accordance with the Minnesota Open Meeting Law. The proceedings of the Authority will be conducted as outlined in the third edition of The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, written by Alice Sturgis and revised by the American Institute of Parliamentarians. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 12 5.2 Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of the Authority shall be the first meeting following the month of May. 5.3 Regular Meetings. Monthly meetings shall be held on the second Wednesday of each month at 5:00 p.m. at City Hall unless an alternative site, including a virtual meeting, has been posted. If, however, the day fixed for any regular meeting falls on a holiday recognized by the St. Louis Park City Council, the meeting shall be held at the same hour on the next succeeding Wednesday, not a holiday, or such other day as designated by the Authority by majority vote. The Authority may, by majority vote, change the regular monthly meeting time as deemed appropriate, provided proper public notice of the changed meeting time is given. The Housing Authority recognizes that not all religious holidays are included in those recognized by the Council and that reasonable accommodation will be provided for religious reasons when notified by an applicant or a member of the public. The Authority may, by majority vote, change the regular monthly meeting time as deemed appropriate, provided proper public notice of the changed meeting time is given. 5.4 Special Meetings. Special meetings of the Authority may be called by the Chair or two commissioners of the Authority for the purpose of transacting any business designated in the call. The call for special meeting shall be delivered in compliance with state law. The Secretary must deliver to the Commissioners at least three days prior to the meeting a notice of the date, time, place and purpose of the special meeting. If however, all Commissioners attend and participate in the meeting, these notice requirements are not necessary. The presence of any Commissioner at a special meeting shall constitute a waiver of any formal notice unless the Commissioner appears for the special purpose of objecting to the holding of such meeting. Notice of the date, time, place and purpose of a special meeting must also be posted by the Secretary on the principal bulletin board of the city at least three days prior to the date of the meeting. 5.5 Quorum. Three (3) Commissioners shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of conducting its business and exercising its powers and for all other purposes. A smaller number may adjourn from time to time until a quorum is obtained. 5.6 Voting. When a quorum is in attendance, action may be taken by the Authority upon a vote of a majority of the Commissioners present, except that any item not included on the original agenda or meeting notice for any regular or special meeting requires an affirmative vote of three (3) members of the commission for passage. 5.7 Order of Business. At the regular meetings of the Authority, the following shall be the order of business: 1. Roll call 2. Approval of the minutes of the previous meeting Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 13 3. Hearings 4. Reports of Committees 5. Unfinished Business 6. New Business 7. Communications and Bills 8. Adjournment 5.8 Record of Proceedings. All minutes and resolutions shall be in writing. Records shall be kept in accordance with MN Statute and rules regarding preservation of public records and the MN Data Privacy Act. ARTICLE VI ‒ EMPLOYEES 6.1 Additional Personnel. The Authority may from time to time employ or use such personnel as it deems necessary to exercise its powers, duties and functions as prescribed by law. The selection and compensation of such personnel shall be determined by the Authority in accordance with laws and policies of the City of St. Louis Park. 6.2 Compensation and Regulations. Employees administering Housing Authority operations are employees of the City of St. Louis Park and receive benefits and compensation in accordance with policies of the City of St. Louis Park 6.3 Personnel Regulations. Employees administering Housing Authority operations are subject to Personnel Regulations of the City Council and Administrative Policies of the City. ARTICLE VII—ADMINISTRATION OF FINANCES 7.1 In General. Administration and conduct of all financial practices of the Authority shall be made in accordance with applicable laws, statutory authorities and administrative rules and policies of the Housing Authority. 7.2 Contracts, Checks and Drafts. The Executive Director or a designee is the chief purchasing agent of the Authority. All purchases on behalf of the Authority shall be made, and all contracts shall be let, by the Executive Director, provided that the approval of the Authority must be given whenever the amount of such purchase or contract exceeds the small purchase threshold as defined in the Housing Authority Procurement Policy. All contracts, bonds, and instruments of every kind, to which the Authority is a party, shall be executed in the name of the Authority and signed by the Executive Director or their designee. Those contracts, bonds, and instruments which exceed the small purchase price shall also be approved by the Housing Authority Board. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 14 7.3 Manner of Presentation of Claims. All bills, invoices, statements and claims for payment of money in discharge of any obligation of the Authority shall be filed with the Executive Director, or designee, who shall cause the same to be examined and entered into the record. Each claim against the Authority shall be accompanied by either an itemized bill or payroll, or time sheet, each of which shall be approved and signed by the responsible officer who vouches for the correctness and reasonableness thereof and, except in the case of salaries and wages of employees, shall be accompanied by the claimant’s verified statement of claim as required by law. 7.4 Payment of Claims. The Executive Director is authorized to pay all claims determined to be proper obligations of the Authority and consistent with the budget approved by the Authority. The Executive Director shall cause a list of newly paid claims to be prepared for Authority review at each regular meeting of the Authority. 7.5 Facsimile Signatures on Authority Checks. Orders and checks may be combined into a single instrument and may be issued on behalf of the Authority upon affixing facsimile signatures of the Chair and Executive Director. 7.6 Disposition of Unclaimed Property. Unclaimed personal property shall be disposed of in accordance with the Housing Authority’s Disposition Policy. Such property shall not be destroyed, abandoned, sold or donated without prior approval of the Authority. ARTICLE VIII‒INDEMNIFICATION 8.1 Indemnification. The Authority shall be authorized to the fullest extent permitted by law to indemnify any person against expenses and liabilities arising by reason of the fact that the person is or was a Commissioner, officer, employee, or agent of the Authority. 8.2 Insurance. The Authority may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any indemnified person in that person’s official capacity against any liability asserted against that person and incurred by that person in such capacity whether or not the Authority would have been required to indemnify the person against the liability under Section 6.1 hereof. ARTICLE IX ‒ AMENDMENTS TO BYLAWS 9.1 Amendments to Bylaws. These bylaws shall be amended only with the approval of at least three (3) of the Commissioners of the Authority at a regular or a special meeting. ARTICLE X‒AUTHORITY ACTIVITES 10.1 Annual Report to the Council. The Authority will submit an annual report to the City Council summarizing the past year’s activities and highlighting issues of concern and other Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 15 information the Authority feels appropriate to convey to the city council. The Authority chair or designee will prepare the report for approval by the Authority. Authority members may submit signed addenda presenting alternative conclusions or perspectives. The report and addenda are submitted with the current year work plan by April 1 or as soon thereafter as possible. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 1) Title: Boards and Commissions check-in with city council: Housing Authority Page 16 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Discussion item: 2 Executive summary Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion Recommended action: Staff requests feedback on the proposed sale of the building at 4300 36 ½ Street West to Partnership in Property Commercial Land Trust (PIPCLT) and on proposed construction financing to PIPCLT to renovate the building. Policy consideration: Does the Economic Development Authority (EDA) support the proposed sale of 4300 36 ½ Street West to PIPCLT for $1,788,000, and support provision of permanent EDA financing of $2 million from the development fund to PIPCLT including land write down and renovation costs for the affordable commercial space project? Summary: PIPCLT proposes a renovation and subdivision of 4300 36 ½ St. W. into commercial condos, which will be sold to emerging entrepreneurs, with ownership of the land in trust by PIPCLT, allowing for permanent affordability of the spaces. The total anticipated project cost is $3.721 million including purchase of the building by PIPCLT, construction costs, professional fees and soft costs required to divide the building into 6 commercial condos and build out a common space and common restrooms. In 2022, the EDA had originally sought to purchase a property for affordable commercial space and approved the purchase of the building at 4300 36 ½ St. W. for $1.788 million. After purchasing the property, the EDA entered into a memorandum of understanding with PIPCLT in 2023 to work collaboratively on the project. In 2024 the EDA applied for grants from a variety of sources and received a total of $514,000 from Hennepin County and the Metropolitan Council to support the project. Design work, market feasibility analysis, project financial analysis and other predevelopment work continued throughout 2025. Financial or budget considerations: The EDA purchased the building for $1.788 million in 2022. Provided by Ehlers, the financial model for sale of the property anticipates a $1.41 million land write down and a $1.5 million construction loan to subdivide the building into 6 commercial condos and build out a common area and common restrooms. This results in a total of $2.907 million invested in the project during the construction phase, expected to take place in 2026. Of the $2.907 million initial investment, an estimated $948,548 would be repaid by buyers of the commercial condos and $551,000 would not be recovered through sales. This would result in a permanent investment of approximately $2 million by the EDA, including the $1.41 million land write down at the time of the sale, and an additional permanent investment of $551,000 to fill the remaining project gap. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Prepared by: Dean Porter-Nelson, redevelopment administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, deputy community development director; Jennifer Monson, economic development manager; Amelia Cruver, finance director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 2 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion Discussion Background: PIPCLT proposes renovation and subdivision of 4300 36 ½ St. W. into commercial condos to sold to emerging entrepreneurs, with ownership of the land in trust by PIPCLT, allowing for permanent affordability of the spaces. In September 2022, the EDA acquired the approximately 8,000 square foot retail building at 4300 36th ½ St. W. Staff have been working with the PIPCLT with the objective of dividing the building into commercial retail and office condominium spaces that could subsequently be sold to small businesses under a land trust arrangement. Building at 4300 36 ½ St. W., interior view: Under such an arrangement, the land trust would retain title to the underlying land and lease it to individual businesses on a long-term basis at an affordable rate. Businesses would purchase (or lease to own) their individual spaces in the building, which would be made more affordable by taking the land cost out of the purchase price. The concept allows emerging entrepreneurs the rare opportunity to acquire their own commercial spaces at a reduced cost, enabling them to build assets and wealth. This structure would also retain the affordability in perpetuity when commercial spaces are sold in the future. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 3 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion History of project: the table below includes prior actions by the city council and EDA related to the commercial land trust project. Prior actions & project milestones Governing body Date Study session - request for feedback on a potential commercial property acquisition for perpetually affordable commercial space. city council May 9, 2022 Written report - proposed purchase agreement for 4300 36 ½ St (Ward 2). city council July 11, 2022 Resolution approving the EDA’s purchase agreement for 4300 36 ½ St. (Ward 2). EDA July 18, 2022 Memorandum of understanding (MOU) with PIPCLT for 4300 36th ½ Street West (Ward 2). EDA Jan. 17, 2023 Resolution authorizing a grant application to the Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Program for pre-development activities for the commercial land trust project. EDA April 17, 2023 Resolution approving a grant agreement with Hennepin County for the affordable commercial initiative. EDA Sept. 9, 2024 The EDA purchased 4300 36 ½ St. W. in September 2022. The purchase price was $1,788,000. Following the purchase, the EDA entered into an MOU with PIPCLT and applied for and received a total of $514,000 in funds from the Metropolitan Council and Hennepin County to support pre-development and acquisition activities related to a proposed sale of the property to PIPCLT. Throughout 2024 and 2025, the EDA and PIPCLT have continued to work towards sale and renovation of the property. A market feasibility analysis was completed by Maxfield Research, design and floor plans were completed by Design by Melo, and financial analysis of the plans for sale and renovation was completed by Ehlers in collaboration with staff. Site location: The site is an attractive location for emerging entrepreneurs. It is: •Visible from Excelsior Blvd. •Walking distance to the Excelsior & Grand area, Miracle Mile shopping center, Park Nicollet clinic and the nearby amenities in Minneapolis. •Near multiple parks and preserves •Additional retail spaces and small office spaces would further contribute to walkability and character of the Excelsior Blvd. commercial corridor. 36TH STREET WEST 36 1/2 STREET WEST EXC E L S I O R B O U L E V A R D EXC E L S I O R B O U L E V A R D ϰϯϬϬ ϯϲƚŚ ϭͬϮ ^ƚƌĞĞƚ Sources: City of St. Louis Park, Metropolitan Council 0 10050 Feet± Path: O:\Geo\Projects\Comm_Dev\Econ Dev\4300_36_andhalf_Street\4300_36_andhalf_Street.aprx Date Saved: 9/29/2025 9:06 AM Affordable Commercial Project Location OŝƚLJ ŽĨ ^ƚ͘ >ŽƵŝƐ WĂƌŬ͕ UĞƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚ ŽĨ OŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ UĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ Page 4 Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 5 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion Proposed floor plan: The current proposed floor plan and the proposed project budget is based on the following design assumptions. • 7,757 usable square feet • 6 commercial condos anticipated • 2 retail spaces • 2 large offices • 2 small offices • Common space including restrooms and common gathering spaces PIPCLT Mission and Vision: A key component of this project is the partnership with PIPCLT. The following background on PIPCLT explains how a commercial land trust works, and why the organizational mission and value proposition relates to the proposed affordable commercial space project. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 6 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion The mission of PIPCLT is to (re)develop and preserve long-term affordable commercial spaces through community-driven ownership of land. PIPCLT “envisions neighborhoods as reflections of the economic, cultural and social life of its people. Places that anchor, hold, sustain and nurture the health and wealth of a community. Neighborhoods where local businesses can grow and thrive, residents claim space through decision-making power and ownership of land and together are building a vibrant human-centered economy.” The basics of a commercial land trust: • Goal: ensure affordable commercial space for qualified entrepreneurs and prevent gentrification/displacement. • How: provide an affordable investment toward the purchase of a commercial building. • Sustainability: retain ability to ensure resale restrictions to perpetuate Commercial Land Trust model when property sells. • Limitations on property: PIPCLT remains tied to title of land via a long-term ground lease. As a commercial land trust, PIPCLT supports two different pathways to commercial real estate ownership for emerging entrepreneurs. Both pathways are often made possible, in part, through public and philanthropic support of individual projects to make the purchase price of a space financially feasible for emerging entrepreneurs, as is the case with the proposed affordable commercial space project in St. Louis Park. The first option includes full ownership of the space by a small business owner at the point of acquisition. • PIPCLT brings portion of purchase price when an emerging entrepreneur purchases space. • Land is placed in trust & governed by community ownership. • Business owners and cooperators bring the remaining balance and cover any improvements. • Business owners have full ownership of the building or condo space and sign an annually renewable 99-year ground lease with the commercial land trust. Lease-to-own is another option that PIPCLT can offer to emerging entrepreneurs. • In some cases, the business owner is unable to secure full financing upfront. • PIPCLT covers the full cost of property and retains ownership of land and building while the business owner makes monthly payments until they have ownership of the space. • Land placed in trust and governed by community ownership. Why is this project important for both PIPCLT and the City of St. Louis Park? PIPCLT believes that city partnerships are important and effective and has experience with similar partnerships. Specifically, PIPCLT and City of Minneapolis previously partnered to acquire 19 E. 26th St. The property is under white shell renovations and upon completion will be handed over to a business that provides various support services for the community, including mental health and disability support, group homes, housing consultation, and caregiving. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 7 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion In comparison to PIPCLT’s past project, the affordable commercial space project in St. Louis Park utilizes a larger space for six commercial units and offers an opportunity to scale up the commercial land trust model. Job creation, wealth-building, foot traffic and community anchoring are shared goals of the project for PIPCLT and St. Louis Park. PIPCLT believes that the project will help boost the local economy and believes that project will gain wider recognition for both St. Louis Park as a community, and for use of the commercial land trust model as a community economic development strategy. Present considerations: PIPCLT proposes renovation and subdivision of 4300 36 ½ St. W. into commercial condos, which will be sold to emerging entrepreneurs, with ownership of the land in trust by PIPCLT, allowing for permanent affordability of the spaces. Analysis from Ehlers, the city’s public finance advisor, shows that the project will require an interim investment of approximately $2.91 million by the EDA during the construction period, after which about $948,000 will be repaid. The project will require a permanent investment of approximately $2 million. This investment includes the following: • EDA land write down at the time of sale in 2026: $1,408,000 • EDA construction loan throughout 2026 (to create common areas, and subdivide the spaces): $1,499,717 • Total initial investment: approximately $2.91 million • Anticipated repayment of construction loan through sale of condos: $948,458 • Anticipated gap in addition to land write down (i.e. construction loan that will not be repaid): $551,259 • Total permanent investment that will not be repaid: approximately $1,959,259 • This investment of $1,959,259 will come out of the development fund, and is equal to approximately $327,000 per commercial space. This figure exceeds past EDA investments in commercial spaces in recent years. Between 2018 and 2025, the EDA provided small business loans (revolving loan fund, 2% loan program and advance loans) to 16 different businesses for a total investment of $1,052,000, an average of approximately $66,000 per business. This group of loans included several larger loans for purchase and renovation, with two two businesses receiving total loans over $200,000. The investment of more than $300,000 per commercial space exceeds those figures. It is intended to be a one-time investment in a building with common space, and individual commercial condos that would be re-sold over time. Over a 30 year period, it is possible that an individual space could change hands 3-5 times, putting a larger one-time investment into context. The overall balance of the development fund is approximately $9 million, and this project will reduce that balance to approximately $7 million. The details of the project’s finances as provided by Ehlers are included below: Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 8 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion Construction Sources and Uses Anticipated Sale Proceeds Permanent Sources and Uses SOURCES Amount Pct.Per Sq. Ft. Construction Loan - City/EDA 1,499,717 40.3% 248.26 Land Writedown - EDA 1,408,000 37.8% 233.07 Hennepin County Grant 380,000 10.2% 62.90 Metropolitan Council Grant 134,000 3.6% 22.18 PIPCLT Equity 250,000 6.7% 41.38 Private Fundraising 50,000 1.3% 8.28 TOTAL SOURCES 3,721,717 100% 616.08 USES Amount Pct.Per Sq. Ft. Acquisition Costs 1,788,000 48.0% 295.98 C onstruction Costs 1,510,273 40.6% 250.00 Abatement/Correction Work 17,000 0.5% 2.81 Permits/Fees 5,000 0.1% 0.83 Professional Services 306,500 8.2% 50.74 Financing Costs 19,944 0.5% 3.30 Developer Fee 75,000 2.0% 12.42 TOTAL USES 3,721,717 100% 616.08 Commercial Sales Price SaleCommercial Space Per Sq/Ft Revenue Sq/Ft $158.00 $221,674 1,403 $158.00 $199,870 1,265 $162.00 $154,710 955 $158.00 $201,924 1,278 $180.00 $76,140 423 $180.00 $94,140 523 Total $948,458 5,847 Commercial Sale $162.21 $948,458 5,847 1. West Space - Retail 1 2. West Space - Retail 2 3. Central Office 4. East Space - Office 1 5. East Space - Office 2 6. East Space - Office 3 SOURCES Amount Pct.Per Sq. Ft. Unpaid Construction Loan - City/EDA 551,259 14.8% 91.25 Land Writedown - EDA 1,408,000 37.8% 233.07 Hennepin County Grant 380,000 10.2% 62.90 Metropolitan Council Grant 134,000 3.6% 22.18 PIPCLT Equity 250,000 6.7% 41.38 Private Fundraising 50,000 1.3% 8.28 Commercial Condo Sale Proceeds 948,458 25.5% 157.00 TOTAL SOURCES 3,721,717 100% 616.08 Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 9 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion Notes on the budget: • 100% of condo sale proceeds will be provided to the EDA to reduce outstanding construction loan balance • There is a $17,000 estimated line item for abatement work. There is an open insurance claim to cover mold remediation, and this figure is an estimate of water damage and mold abatement work that will not be covered by insurance, which includes potential replacement of a leaking water line below the building that is not a covered repair. There is some remaining uncertainty regarding the overall cost of this work. In reviewing the permanent sources and uses, Ehlers and St. Louis Park staff reviewed the following options to repay the remainder of the construction loan ($551,259) that will not be recovered when the commercial condos are sold: 1. Debt service payments from commercial condo annual dues (not recommended) 2. Future property tax collections (generates insufficient revenue) 3. Percentage of any market value increases upon resale (not recommended) 4. Debt service not fully repaid (recommended) Option 1: Debt service repaid through commercial condo dues • Annual commercial condo dues are anticipated to be $45,000 annually. • Condo units' annual dues determined on sq. footage percentage, paid monthly through the year. • Anticipate about $8 per square foot annually, or $300 - $900 per month based on condo unit size. • EDA could require debt service payments be added to dues, which would increase the dues accordingly. • A $551,259 loan amortized over 30 years with an interest rate of 0.00% would equate to annual debt service payments of $18,375 total (on top of projected dues). Ultimately, the inclusion of debt service payments in condo dues could make this venture unaffordable for business owners and significantly increase the complexity of the various agreements associated with a commercial land trust condo project. This option is not recommended. Option 2: Debt service repaid through property tax collections • The EDA’s property is currently tax exempt, and upon the sale of 4300 36 ½ St. W. to PIPCLT, the commercial building will become taxable • After construction completion and sale of the commercial condo units, total property taxes are estimated to be $25,788 USES Amount Pct.Per Sq. Ft. Acquisition Costs 1,788,000 48.0% 295.98 C onstruction Costs 1,510,273 40.6% 250.00 Abatement/Correction Work 17,000 0.5% 2.81 Permits/Fees 5,000 0.1% 0.83 Professional Services 306,500 8.2% 50.74 Financing Costs 19,944 0.5% 3.30 Developer Fee 75,000 2.0% 12.42 TOTAL USES 3,721,717 100% 616.08 Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 10 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion o The city’s portion of property taxes paid is estimated to be $5,765 • Anticipated property tax revenue after renovation is similar to property taxes previously paid for 4300 36 ½ St. W. prior to purchase by the EDA in 2022 Staff and consultants cannot recommend recovery of debt service through property tax revenue because the property is not anticipated to generate excess tax revenue to repay debt, when compared to its prior use. Option 3: Debt service repaid from market value increases • After the initial condominium purchase, proceeds from future resale under the land trust model are distributed as follows: • Business owners receive their paid equity, plus • 25% of any market value increase due to appreciation, plus • 100% of any market value increase resulting from a qualified capital improvement. • Example: retail space purchased for $200,000, appraises for $310,000 in the future, with $10,000 of capital improvements, would sell for $310,000. • Seller would receive the original value of $200,000 + $25,000 (25% of appreciation) + $10,000 (100% of capital improvement value) = $235,000 total. • PIPCLT would retain $75,000 (75% of appreciation) to reinvest in the next buyer/owner, bringing acquisition cost down to $235,000. The EDA could ask to receive a portion of the resale distribution (e.g. 5% of market value increase). In analyzing this option, Ehlers and staff noted that this method of recovering construction loan proceeds would counteract the project goal of creating perpetually affordable commercial condos for emerging entrepreneurs. Specifically, business owners who sold would retain less earned wealth, and/or a lower affordability investment by the land trust would make spaces less affordable for future purchasers over time. As such, this method of debt recovery is not recommended because it dilutes the community impact of a permanent affordability investment while adding additional complexity to purchase and resale agreements. Option 4: Debt service not fully repaid (recommended) • In this scenario, the EDA would not seek repayment of the final $550,000 after the condos are sold • To reduce the EDA’s contribution, PIPCLT and EDA staff may pursue additional grants. However, the project has already received resources from key funders (Hennepin County and Met Council) and receipt of additional grants prior to closing is not anticipated at this time. • Guardrails for EDA investment • Generally, the EDA would have a right of first refusal built into the purchase and construction loan agreement. • This would enable acquisition of the building by the EDA in the unlikely event of an unsuccessful project (i.e. if the structure were to remain vacant and unused for a long period of time after a sale to PIPCLT). Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 11 Title: Commercial Land Trust discussion • In this unlikely scenario, the EDA would regain control of the building and would then need to complete a sale of the property. Given the location of the property, it is likely that the building could be sold in a timely manner. • However, in this scenario, none of the EDA’s investment in the property would be recovered through the sale of commercial condos. • Instead, the investment would total $3,188,000 including the initial purchase price of $1,788,000, and the renovation loan of approximately $1,500,000. A portion of this investment would need to be recovered through the sale of the subdivided building. An appraisal dated April 2025 values the post-improvement building with 6 commercial condos and improved common spaces at $1.1 million. If the building were sold for this prior appraised value, losses to the EDA development fund would be approximately $2.2 million. This scenario is ultimately recommended after a review of other scenarios. Staff and Ehlers note that the overall investment in the project will be approximately $2 million to achieve the desired community impact of creating six commercial spaces that will remain affordable to emerging entrepreneurs in perpetuity. Although a large permanent investment of more than $300,000 per commercial space is required, this legacy investment in the land trust model will create affordable commercial space options and preserve those options far into the future without an “expiration date” as opposed to one-time grants or loans that might support a similar goal but have a more time-limited impact. Although the options above could potentially reduce the cost of the investment, each option adds complexity to the project structure and reduces the ability of the project to support long term affordability of commercial spaces. Next steps: If the city council supports the proposed affordable commercial space project, staff will work with PIPCLT towards a sale of the property in early 2026 based on the financial model and terms outlined above. If the city council chooses to proceed with the project, anticipated upcoming actions and project milestones would include the following: Future actions & project milestones Governing body Date Consideration of a resolution to approve minor modifications to the existing memorandum of understanding (MOU) between PIPCLT and the St. Louis Park EDA EDA Oct. 20, 2025 Public hearing and consideration of a purchase agreement, and a construction loan agreement to support renovation of the property into commercial condos by PIPCLT EDA and city council Q1 2026 Renovation of common areas, and marketing of the commercial condos by PIPCLT and the City of St. Louis Park economic development staff NA Q2 – Q3 2026 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Written report: 3 Executive summary Title: Community Development Block Grant allocation changes Recommended action: No action needed. The city is opting into the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Consolidated Pool beginning in 2026. Policy consideration: Does the city council concur with the recommendation to opt into the CDBG Consolidated Pool? Summary: Each year, the city receives an allocation of CDBG funds from the U.S. Housing and Urban Development (HUD) agency for use in addressing community development needs that meet the programs national objectives. CDBG funds are distributed from HUD through Hennepin County (county) to the city. Of the city’s allocation, 15% is held back by the county for public services allowing service providers to apply to Hennepin County through a competitive request for proposal (RFP). For the remaining 85% - the community development portion - the city council approves the spending plan annually. The 2025 estimated CDBG allocation is $169,216.21. In February 2025, the city council approved allocation of the fiscal year 2025 CDBG funds to the low-income deferred rehab loan administered by Hennepin County. Recently, Hennepin County notified direct allocation cities, including St. Louis Park, that in an effort to meet ongoing requirements of the Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program (Urban County CDBG Program), Hennepin County is moving toward one consolidated funding pool guided by the Consolidated Plan prior to program year 2026 (beginning July 1, 2026). There are two options moving forward: 1) St. Louis Park could elect to receive CDBG funding directly, which includes administration of the funding and preparation of reports to HUD annually; or 2) the city can opt into the consolidated pool, the county will administer the funding and the city will no longer direct the county on how the city’s portion is spent. Financial or budget considerations: If the city opts into the consolidated pool there are no budget impacts. The county will administer the program. If the city elects to be a direct recipient, it will receive a 10% administrative fee and utilize staff time within the finance and community development departments likely exceeding the 10% administrative fee. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Marney Olson, housing manager Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director and Sean Walther, deputy community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 3) Page 2 Title: Community Development Block Grant allocation changes Discussion The national objectives of the federal CDBG program are: • to benefit low- and moderate-income persons, • prevention or elimination of slum or blight, and/or • to meet a particular urgent community development need. The city council has historically focused CDBG funds on improvements to the housing stock for low-income households or affordable homeownership. The CDBG program allows for up to 15% of allocated funds to be used to fund public services. Beginning in 2018, Hennepin County set aside the public service funds to be awarded through a combined, competitive RFP to facilitate more impactful use of the funds. In the past, the city has funded Homes Within Reach land trust and rehabilitation and improvements at affordable housing properties in St. Louis Park. Federal regulations and other regulatory requirements related to the use of federal funding for multifamily properties, along with St. Louis Park’s limited CDBG award, have made funding these types of projects infeasible. This, combined with the increased demand for the low-income deferred rehab loan program resulted in the city allocating its entire CDBG award to the low-income deferred rehab program the last three CDBG funding years. Present considerations: Hennepin County notified direct allocation cities, including St. Louis Park, that to meet ongoing requirements of the Urban County CDBG Program, Hennepin County is moving toward a consolidated funding pool guided by the Consolidated Plan prior to program year 2026 (beginning July 1, 2026). There are two options for moving forward: 1. St. Louis Park could elect to receive CDBG funding directly, which includes administration of funding and preparation of reports to HUD annually; or 2. The city can opt into the consolidated pool, the county will administer all the funding and reporting, and the city will no longer direct the county on how the city’s portion is spent. Option 1: Direct allocation The City of St. Louis Park would receive a direct allocation, approximately $200,000 in CDBG funds from HUD. Of this, 10% could be used for administrative expenses. The remainder could be spent on CDBG eligible activities. The city would be responsible for complying with HUD requirements. Based on staff experience and consulting with other cities, the reporting process is cumbersome and time-consuming. In some cities, that is the sole responsibility of one full- time employee. Option 2: Consolidated pool St. Louis Park’s annual allocation would be consolidated into a larger pool and administered by Hennepin County. St. Louis Park residents would continue to be eligible to apply to the county for the deferred housing rehab loan program. Programs that had been served in the past, prior to the city limiting CDBG funds to just the deferred loan program, would be able to participate Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 3) Page 3 Title: Community Development Block Grant allocation changes in a competitive consolidated pool of funding through Hennepin County that is awarded based on highest need and potential impact. Next steps: Due to the costs and staffing that is required to administer the CDBG funds and the relatively small amount of funding the city receives, staff recommends opting into the consolidated pool. If council concurs, staff will notify Hennepin County that the city is opting into the consolidated pool beginning July 1, 2026. The county typically updates the Joint Cooperative Agreement (JCA) every three years. Prior to the JCA the county conducts an Urban County qualification period for participants in the CDBG consortium. During future qualification periods, St. Louis Park will have the option to decide how it will participate in the CDBG Consortium. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 6, 2025 Written report: 4 Executive summary Title: Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off Recommended action: None. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview and framework of the planned discussions in the study sessions included in the housing and neighborhood-oriented development system. Policy consideration: Throughout the discussions in this system, the council will be asked specific policy questions relating to the topic discussed. Additionally, during these discussions, staff would like council to reflect on the following question (not to be answered at this study session): Do the current housing and neighborhood-oriented development policies meet the desired goal/outcome to continue to provide a broad range of housing and neighborhood-oriented development and advance diversity, equity and inclusion? Summary: Over the coming weeks, the city council will engage in a series of discussions on the strategic priority of housing and neighborhood-oriented development. Staff will support these conversations by providing information through both presentations and written reports. Some of the materials are prepared at the direction of the city council, while others are staff-initiated to provide additional context, updates and analysis of current activities, programs and policies. This report is intended to ground the upcoming discussions by offering a broad overview of housing and neighborhood-oriented development efforts, including the key frameworks that guide decision-making in this area. The foundation for staff’s developing projects, implementing programs, and shaping recommendations comes from the plans and policies adopted by the city council. To initiate this discussion, staff have prepared an overview of the city’s housing and neighborhood-oriented development planning, along with a summary of the guiding documents for reference. Financial or budget considerations: Funds are budgeted in the 2026 community development budgets for a variety of programs to support housing and neighborhood-oriented development. Should the council desire a change in work surrounding housing and neighborhood-oriented development, additional resources may be required. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Karen Barton, community development director/interim building and energy director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4) Page 2 Title: Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off Discussion Background: In 2018, the city council adopted five strategic priorities based on information gathered during the 2016-2017 Vision 3.0 community engagement process. During the city’s visioning process, “developing creative housing solutions” was identified as one of five specific vision areas for the community. Strategic priorities were developed from this visioning process and the city adopted the following strategic priority: “St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood-oriented development.” Statements further delineating this strategic priority include the following sub-bullets: • Providing more diverse and creative housing choices to meet the needs of current and future residents while preserving existing affordable housing. • Fostering and facilitating reinvestment and redevelopment of neighborhood-oriented businesses and services. • Promoting locally owned small business, especially in indigenous, immigrant, and communities of color. • Conducting research to further understand what people want and need access to in the community (i.e., food, services, housing options, business opportunities, gathering spaces). Staff continue to address the sub-bullets noted above through various programs and policies. The city’s vision for land use and development is focused on creating livable neighborhoods with a variety of housing choices and access to neighborhood-oriented businesses, services, recreation and gathering spaces. Stable housing and economic opportunities are essential to the health, safety and welfare of St. Louis Park residents. Many households face barriers to secure, stable housing in the rental market and in affordable homeownership opportunities, while many small businesses need assistance to thrive and grow. The city’s planning, zoning and housing and economic development programs and policies are designed to address these issues and concerns and to support the city council’s strategic priorities. Housing and small business assistance programs: Each year, the city budgets millions of dollars in support of the city’s small business and of the city’s housing goals to promote and facilitate a balanced and enduring housing stock that offers a continuum of diverse lifecycle housing choices for households in all income levels including affordable housing. The city has implemented a number of programs to create affordable housing, support the preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH), facilitate homeownership and wealth building, enact tenant protection policies, and aid local businesses and entrepreneurs. Staff monitor and regularly review the effectiveness of these programs and policies in relation to the city’s strategic priorities and current needs of the community, making changes and creating new programs and policies as needed. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4) Page 3 Title: Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off Planning and zoning: The division coordinates the city’s long-range planning efforts, zoning administration and development review. The city’s comprehensive plan sets goals, policies and strategies related to the built and natural environment and influences quality of life. The division’s work typically focuses on land use planning and administering zoning and subdivision codes used to implement city policy. Together these tools help shape the built environment and public realm in the city and the infrastructure supporting the community. Land use regulations can impact availability of housing, goods and services and employment. Land use also influences the environment, including air and water quality and the climate. They can be exclusionary or inclusionary, creating opportunities or inequities. In response to inequities that have occurred due to some historical zoning practices across the country and in St. Louis Park, the division has had a role in the Just Deeds initiative to educate property owners about and discharge of over 1,800 discriminatory covenants in the city. Staff also analyzed and overhauled the zoning code to further address these historical inequities and allow more housing and more housing types in the city. Affordable housing goals: As part of the decennial comprehensive plan update, the Metropolitan Council (Met Council) provides affordable housing goals for the city over the upcoming ten-year period. The city incorporates these goals into its planning efforts to facilitate achieving and/or exceeding those goals. The Met Council affordable housing goal for St. Louis Park between 2021 and 2030 is a total of 326 units broken down by 30%, 50% and 80% Area Median Income (AMI). The chart below shows the number of affordable units completed and under construction since 2021: Area median income Met Council goal Completed Total completed compared to Met Council AMI goals 30% AMI 169 (30% AMI and below) 40 40 40% AMI N/A 22 N/A 50% AMI 98 (31%-50% AMI) 212 234*^ 60% AMI N/A 275 N/A 80% AMI 59 (51%-80% AMI) 0 275*~ Total 326 549 549* *Goal met ^Includes 50% and 40% AMI units; Met Council’s goal includes units between 31% and 50% AMI ~Includes both 80% and 60% AMI units; Met Council’s goal includes units between 51% and 80% AMI The adoption and implementation of the city’s inclusionary housing policy, affordable housing trust fund, and use of tax increment financing have led directly to the success of exceeding the Met Council’s goals for the creation of affordable housing at 80% and 50% area median income, as well as the creation of units affordable at 60% AMI and 40% AMI. 30% AMI continues to be a challenge to facilitate due to the extensive subsidies needed to create this level of affordability. To achieve the Met Council’s goals for 30% AMI housing in St. Louis Park, we will need to add an average of 21.5 units per year affordable at 30% AMI between now and 2030. This will continue to be a priority for staff despite the continuing challenges. It should also be noted that an effective means to provide housing at or below 30% AMI is using rental assistance, such as Housing Choice Vouchers. The housing authority is currently Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4) Page 4 Title: Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off administering 368 housing choice vouchers. The Housing Authority has added 83 vouchers since 2020. Additionally, the State of Minnesota has provided funding for Bring it Home, a state level rental assistance program that will add additional affordable housing in St. Louis Park and throughout Minnesota. The Housing Authority submitted a proposal in spring 2025 and was subsequently notified of an award of $1,378,556 for two years of Housing Assistance Payments (HAP) and administrative fees. The Housing Authority anticipates providing rental assistance to approximately 52 additional households with this funding. These vouchers can be used in new construction affordable units as well as NOAH units that meet rent limits for the program. Staff created and maintains a multi-family housing dashboard to provide current data on the city’s progress towards achieving these goals. The Metropolitan Council does not count units toward the goal until they are complete. As noted, units at 30% AMI continue to be the most difficult to create and are also the most needed. Additionally, staff created and maintains a development dashboard that provides detailed information about the city’s developments over the past 20 years. Diversity, equity, and inclusion: Throughout these discussions, the council will be asked to view any policy direction through a diversity, equity and inclusion lens. It is important to challenge our traditional way of thinking to allow for greater opportunity to embrace and incorporate diversity, promote equity and foster inclusion. Guiding documents: Linked are several existing city policies, plans, reports and studies that are used in developing housing and neighborhood-oriented development projects, responding to requests from the public, and identifying funding needs. A summary of these policies, plans, reports and studies, along with when they were approved, is below: 1. St. Louis Park 2040 comprehensive plan including Chapter 5 A Livable Community - 2018 St. Louis Park’s land use and development is guided by its vision of creating and maintaining a very livable community. As a result of Vision 3.0, one of the city’s five Strategic Priorities states, “St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood-oriented development.” The city’s vision for land use and development is focused on creating livable neighborhoods with a variety of housing choices and access to neighborhood-oriented businesses, services, recreation and gathering spaces. The community’s ten livable community principles embrace the best design practices from the past and the present for creating a complete and connected community that integrates housing, schools, shops, workplaces, parks and civic facilities essential to the daily life of the community. St. Louis Park’s livable community principles consist of: 1. Walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods 2. Life-cycle housing choices 3. Higher density, mixed-use development 4. Human scale development 5. Transit-oriented development 6. Multi-modal streets and pathways Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4) Page 5 Title: Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off 7. Preserved and enhanced natural environment 8. Attractive and convenient public gathering places 9. Public art, heritage, and culture 10. Unique community and neighborhood identity The comprehensive plan has a 20-year time horizon and is updated every 10 years; the next update must be completed by 2028. This major community engagement and planning effort usually takes two to three years and since 1995 has been preceded by a community visioning process to identify and define communitywide values and priorities. The most recent Vision 3.0 also assessed emerging trends relevant to the city and its future. The city is currently embarking on its Vision 4.0 process, with the goal of completing the visioning by the end of 2026. When this updated visioning process is complete, the information gathered will be used to inform updated strategic priorities for the city. 2. Inclusionary housing policy – 2024 The city adopted the inclusionary housing policy in June 2015 and it has been amended several times in the past ten years to meet community needs, provide clarity and address unintended consequences. The policy requires market rate multi-family residential developers receiving financial assistance from the city, requesting zoning changes using a planned unit development (PUD) or requesting a land use amendment to the comprehensive plan to increase residential density to include a percentage of affordable units in the development. Staff propose minor modifications to the policy for clarity and ease of use. 3. Affordable housing trust fund policy and use guide – 2021 In 2018, the city established an affordable housing trust fund (AHTF). Housing trust funds are distinct funds established by city, county or state governments that receive ongoing dedicated sources of public funding to support the preservation and production of affordable housing. In 2020, the city received special approval from the State Legislature to allow the city to deposit pooled tax increment for affordable housing into the AHTF. This allows greater flexibility in the use of the pooled tax increment financing (TIF) for ownership opportunities and more deeply affordable housing preservation and production. The city was required to submit a report to the legislature in early 2024 and again at the end of 2026, when the special legislation is set to expire. 4. Tax increment financing policy – 2021 The city’s tax increment financing (TIF) policy was first adopted in 1997. The economic development authority/city council most recently approved an updated TIF policy in late 2021. The purpose of this policy is to establish the city's position relating to the use of TIF for private development. The policy is used as a guide in processing and reviewing applications requesting TIF assistance. The fundamental purpose of TIF in St. Louis Park Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4) Page 6 Title: Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off is to promote desirable development that advances the city’s strategic priorities and interests that would not otherwise occur without the TIF assistance. 5. Diversity, equity, and inclusion policy – 2022 The city adopted a diversity, equity, and inclusion policy in late 2022. It applies to all development projects receiving tax increment financing assistance. The policy promotes the inclusion of under-represented person and businesses in development projects receiving public financing through the Economic Development Authority and City of St. Louis Park. The goal of this policy is to address disparities and to promote inclusive and equitable opportunities for women and BIPOC/AAPI individuals and businesses to build wealth. Since the policy’s inception, the council has been provided with quarterly reports detailing achievements and outcomes. 6. Housing activity report – 2024 The annual report provides information on the city’s housing programs, new initiatives, updates, historical trends and data on city and federally funded housing programs and activities that advance the city’s housing goals. 7. Housing market study – 2023 The city regularly contracts to have a comprehensive housing study conducted that provides detailed information about the city’s current housing stock, demographics, and anticipated future needs. This study is a valuable resource to help effectively guide the city’s efforts to meet the housing needs of the city’s current and future residents. Staff engaged Maxfield Research to update the city’s housing study in 2023. Present considerations: The topics listed below are scheduled to be brought before council over the next two months. They all center on housing and neighborhood-oriented development and offer opportunities to consider how these activities support the housing and neighborhood-oriented development strategic priority, as well as other city council strategic priorities. These topics will examine current activities, programs, and policies and offer opportunities, identified by both council and staff, for expansion or adjustment where applicable. Next steps: Throughout the discussions in this system, council will be asked to provide policy direction that will shape the housing and neighborhood-oriented development strategy in the city. The dates outlined in the following table are subject to change. Special study session meeting of October 6, 2025 (Item No. 4) Page 7 Title: Housing and neighborhood oriented system kick-off Housing and neighborhood-oriented development system schedule Topic Date Description Housing and neighborhood- oriented development system kick-off Oct. 6, 2025 Written report to provide a high-level overview of system discussion. Commercial Land Trust Project Oct. 6, 2025 Project update presentation and discussion. CDBG allocation changes Oct. 6, 2025 Written report regarding changes to the federal Community Development Block Grant allocation. Prevailing Wage Oct. 13, 2025 Council requested discussion relating to consideration of a prevailing wage ordinance. Developer Business Practices Oct. 13, 2025 Discussion of council decision nodes and guardrails relating to proposed development projects. TIF Management Oct. 20, 2025 Presentation and discussion for overview of the annual tax increment financing management report. TIF and other financial incentives Oct. 20, 2025 Presentation and discussion of public financial assistance and incentives for development projects. Inclusionary housing policy updates Nov. 3, 2025 Presentation and discussion of proposed updates to the inclusionary housing policy. Minnetonka Blvd. Twin Homes update Nov. 3, 2025 Written report providing an update on the Minnetonka Blvd. Twin Homes development project Conduit Bond Policy Amendment Nov. 3, 2025 Written report regarding a proposed minor change to the Conduit Bond Policy to clarify the allowed application timing for affordable housing developments. Zoning Code Updates Nov. 10, 2025 Presentation and discussion of proposed zoning code updates relating to commercial and industrial properties Conveyance of EDA owned land to the City Nov. 10, 2025 Written report detailing planned conveyances of EDA owned land to the city. Single Family Rentals Update Nov. 17, 2025 Written report providing an update on the number of single-family rental homes in St. Louis Park. Housing and neighborhood- oriented development wrap-up Nov. 17, 2025 Written report summarizing the council’s policy direction from the systems discussions that will guide city staff implementation efforts.