HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/03/17 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
MARCH 17, 2025
6:00 p.m. Economic Development Authority – meeting canceled
6:15 p.m. City council meeting – Council Chambers
1. Call to order
a.Roll call.
b.Pledge of Allegiance.
2.Approve agenda.
3.Presentations
a.Presentation of Human Rights Award
b.Recognition of donations
c.Westopolis annual update
4. Minutes
a.Minutes of February 18, 2025 city council meeting
5. Consent items
a.Accept donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Parks and Recreation summer
concert series
b.Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka
Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
c.Approve Beltline Station plat extension - Ward 1
d.Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-
potency hemp retail registration and appendix A fees
e.Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 regarding tobacco licensing and
paraphernalia
f.Approve Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 and continued work with the Multi-Community Wellhead
Protection Plan Pilot study group work for Part 2
6.Public hearings – none.
7. Regular business – none.
8. Communications and announcements – none.
9.Adjournment.
There will be a short recess at 7:22 p.m. so those who observe Ramadan may break their fast.
Agenda city council and special study session meetings of March 17, 2025
Following city council meeting – Special study session – Community Room
Discussion items
1. Whistle quiet zone overview
2. Municipal building planning process: educational session
Written report
3. Recreational Outdoor Center (ROC) acoustics report
Members of the public can attend St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and city council meetings in person. At regular
city council meetings, members of the public may comment on any item on the agenda by attending the meeting in-person or by
submitting written comments to info@stlouisparkmn.gov by noon the day of the meeting. Official minutes of meetings are
available on the city website once approved.
Watch St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority or regular city council meetings live at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or at
www.parktv.org, or on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14/HD channel 798). Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on
the city's YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the meeting’s end.
City council study sessions are not broadcast. Generally, it is not council practice to receive public comment during study sessions.
The council chambers are equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow.
If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Presentation: 3a
Executive summary
Title: Presentation of Human Rights Award
Recommended action: No formal action is requested. The city council is invited to join the
Human Rights Commission in acknowledging Dana Strahnson from the Hennepin County
Library, St. Louis Park branch as the recipient of the 2024 Human Rights Award.
Policy consideration: None at this time.
Summary: The Human Rights Award honors individuals, groups, organizations or businesses
that have made significant contributions to fostering understanding and cooperation among
people from diverse backgrounds in St. Louis Park. This award celebrates those who have
actively worked to advance human rights and justice within the city. Many commendable
nominations were received this year, and the Human Rights Commission (HRC) has selected a
winner for 2024. The HRC recognizes Dana Strahnson from the St. Louis Park Library as the
recipient of the 2024 Human Rights Award for their work in promoting human rights, justice,
equity and inclusion in St. Louis Park.
The St. Louis Park HRC is honored to acknowledge the recipient mentioned above for the 2024
Human Rights Award. Chair Catherine Lawler Turnball and Vice Chair Andrea Alvare of the HRC
will present the award to our winner.
Financial or budget considerations: None at this time.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity
and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Presentation of Human Rights Award
Discussion
Background: The Human Rights Award recognizes individuals, groups, organizations or
businesses that have made an outstanding contribution toward uplifting human rights, justice,
equity and inclusion in the community, and seeks out those who have fostered increased
understanding and cooperation between people of different backgrounds in St. Louis Park.
The Human Rights Commission (HRC) received multiple outstanding nominations for the 2024
award. After much discussion and consideration, the HRC would like to recognize the winner.
Present considerations: Dana Strahnson's work as a Youth Services Librarian at the St. Louis
Park Library has been praised as a model for our entire library system. She expertly combines
the use of GIS Maps and the Racial Equity Impact Tool with her unparalleled passion for youth
services and community engagement. Dana represents the qualities of an exceptional leader
and public servant, and her enthusiasm, dedication and commitment to excellence make her
truly deserving of recognition for her outstanding contributions to both St. Louis Park and
Hennepin County.
The mission of the library is to inspire, facilitate and celebrate lifelong learning. Whether
creating programs to reach marginalized communities and new library users, collaborating with
the school district to ensure all students receive library cards and become familiar with our
resources, or partnering with the city of St. Louis Park to lead the creation of a city-wide
Summer Reading Festival, Dana has demonstrated a firm commitment to prioritizing the
residents of St. Louis Park. Dana's focus on disparity reduction has made our library an inviting,
inclusive, and accessible space for all, ensuring our community has a shared environment for
enrichment and connection.
The St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission is honored to acknowledge Dana Strahnson as the
recipient of the 2024 Human Rights Award.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Presentation: 3b
Executive summary
Title: Recognition of donations
Recommended action: Lisa Abernathy, Recreation Supervisor, will be present to accept a
donation in the amount of $4,395.68 from Derek Riese and Becky Bakken, Rotary Club of St.
Louis Park, for the summer concert series. The donation will be officially accepted by the city
council as a consent item following the presentation.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use?
Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is
necessary to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of
each donation prior to it being expended.
The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park is graciously donating an amount of $4,395.68. The donation is
given with the restriction that it be used toward the summer concert series.
Financial or budget considerations: The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park accepted donations at the
annual Bundled Up! event held on Jan. 25, 2025. The donations received are provided to
support the summer concert series. The summer concert series are free concerts budgeted in
the Organized Recreation budget.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: None.
Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Reviewed by: Jason T. West, director of parks and recreation
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Presentation: 3c
Executive summary
Title: Westopolis annual update
Recommended action: No action required. Becky Bakken, President & CEO of Westopolis
(formerly Discover St. Louis Park), will be in attendance to provide an annual update on the
activities of our destination marketing organization.
Policy consideration: None at this time. This presentation is for informational purposes.
Summary: Every year, Westopolis prepares an annual report on the state of the local tourism
industry, their activities and results. The mission of Westopolis is to enhance St. Louis Park and
Golden Valley’s economy, image and quality of life by promoting the area as a prime meeting
and visitor destination. Ms. Bakken will provide a summary of 2024 activity, including economic
impacts, employment trends and performance statistics of nine (9) hotel properties in the area.
Financial or budget considerations: Pursuant to state law (M.S. 469.190) a 3% lodging tax is
collected on applicable short-term rentals. The city retains five percent of the lodging tax
proceeds collected each month for administrative costs. State law requires that 95% of the
gross proceeds from any lodging tax imposed be used to fund a separate non-profit
organization for the purpose of marketing and promoting the city to visitors.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: None.
Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk
Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Minutes: 4a
Unofficial minutes
City council meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Feb. 18, 2025
1. Call to order.
Mayor Mohamed called the meeting to order at 6:35 p.m.
a. Pledge of allegiance
b. Roll call
Council members present: Mayor Nadia Mohamed, Paul Baudhuin, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd,
Lynette Dumalag, Yolanda Farris, Margaret Rog
Council members absent: none
Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), city attorney (Mr. Mattick), community development
director (Ms. Barton), finance director (Ms. Cruver), administrative services director (Ms.
Brodeen), senior planner (Ms. Chamberlain), community engagement coordinator (Mr.
Coleman), economic development manager (Mr. Hunt), zoning administrator (Mr. Morrison),
housing supervisor (Ms. Olson), deputy city clerk (Ms. Scott-Lerdal), HR director (Ms. Vorpahl),
planning manager (Mr. Walther)
2. Approve agenda.
Motion by Council Member Dumalag, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve the
agenda as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
3. Presentations.
a. Recognition of donations
Mayor Mohamed thanked Park Coin for their donation of $250 to the fire department.
4. Minutes.
a. Minutes of Jan. 21, 2025 city council meeting
b. Minutes of Jan. 21, 2025, study session meeting
c. Minutes of Feb. 10, 2025, closed executive session
Motion by Council Member Rog, seconded by Council Member Budd, to approve the Jan. 21,
2025, city council meeting and study session meeting minutes, and Feb. 10, 2025, closed
executive session minutes as presented.
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Consent items.
a. Resolution No. 25-025 accepting donations to the Fire Department
b. Resolution No. 25-026 approving 2025-2027 LELS Local #218 Police Sergeants Labor
Agreement
c. Resolution No. 25-027 updating employee personnel manual
d. Resolution No. 25-028 authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at
2941 Kentucky Avenue South - Ward 1
e. Approve bid for South Oak Pond Water Quality Improvement project (4024-4000) -
Ward 2
f. Reject bid for 2025 Sanitary Sewer Mainline Rehabilitation project (4025-3000)
g. Resolution No. 25-029 approving cooperative construction agreement with MnDOT for
Shelard Parkway/ TH169 intersection project (4025-8000) - Ward 4
h. Approve city council travel for National League of Cities Congressional Cities Conference
2025
i. Approve business owner changes for liquor licensees
j. Resolution No. 25-030 to approve off-site gambling for Community Charities of
Minnesota
k. Approve boards and commissions workplans
l. Resolution No. 25-031 accepting city manager's performance evaluation and adjusting
compensation
Council Member Brausen commented regarding consent item 5b, thanking the city’s human
resources department and the police sergeants for coming to an agreement that will last three
years.
Council Member Brausen noted that four council members will be traveling to the National
League of Cities Congressional Cities Conference 2025 in March, stating they will meet with
their congressional delegation to discuss the new political landscape in Washington D.C. and
also lobbying federal officials for local projects. He thanked residents for supporting this work
being done on their behalf.
Council Member Dumalag noted consent item 5k, approving boards and commissions
workplans. She thanked staff for their work, as well as those serving on boards and
commissions. She noted workplans give guidance on their work.
Council Member Budd added there is renewed energy around the workplans; she is excited the
commissions are in place and launching a fresh start. It was exciting to see all the good ideas
reflected in the workplans
Council Member Rog agreed that a lot of work and energy went into the workplans, adding it is
good to see. She stated this will be the last time council will approve workplans on the consent
agenda; in the future, it will be better to interface individually with boards and commissions.
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
Mayor Mohamed added the council is also accepting the city manager’s annual performance
review. She pointed out that Ms. Keller continues to receive high scores and her work with
staff, council and the community reflects the positive impact of her caring, strategic spirit, and
her focus on collaboration. Mayor Mohamed thanked Ms. Keller for her work and leadership in
her role.
Council Member Farris stated the city manager’s annual review was a good experience and Ms.
Keller continues to do a good job. Council Member Farris observed that the city manager has a
big role, and Ms. Keller carries herself well. She thanked Ms. Keller for supporting the council.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Dumalag, to approve the
consent items as listed; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 7-0.
6. Public hearings.
a. Resolution No.25-032 allocating 2025 Community Development Block Grant (CDGB)
funds
Ms. Olson presented the staff report.
Council Member Rog asked if any St. Louis Park non-profits have applied for and received CDGB
funding through this grant process. Ms. Olson stated she does not know if anyone has applied
this year, but in the past, STEP has applied for and received funds for the emergency rental
program.
Mayor Mohamed opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Mohamed
closed the public hearing.
Council Member Brausen stated it is appropriate to allocate funds this way, as there is
uncertainty on how Hennepin County may change the formula in the future.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to adopt
Resolution No. 25-032 approving the allocation of 2025 Community Block Development Grant
funds.
The motion passed 7-0.
7. Regular business.
a. Resolutions amending special permit and approving conditional use permit for West
End Office Park, second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 2688-25 for planned
unit development for Terasa – Ward 4
Ms. Chamberlain presented the staff report.
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 4
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
Council Member Rog stated she is not opposed to the development and will support this.
Council Member Brausen stated this development is in the interest of the community and he
will support it.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Farris, to adopt Resolution
No. 25-033 and 25-034 amending special permit and approving conditional use permit for West
End Office Park, second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 2688-25 for planned unit
development for Terasa.
The motion passed 7-0.
b. Resolution establishing the Terasa Tax Increment Financing District and the TIF plan –
Ward 4
Mr. Hunt presented the staff report.
Council Member Rog said for reasons stated earlier at the EDA meeting, she will vote in
opposition.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Dumalag, to adopt
Resolution No. 25- 035 establishing the Terasa Tax Increment Financing District and the TIF
plan.
The motion passed 6-1 (Council Member Rog opposed).
c. Resolution approving private redevelopment contract and interfund loan for Terasa
LLC – Ward 4
Mr. Hunt presented the staff report.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Farris, to adopt Resolution
No. 25-036 establishing the Terasa Tax Increment Financing District.
The motion passed 6-1 (Council Member Rog opposed).
d. Resolution approving amendments to the comprehensive plan, first reading of zoning
ordinance amendments pertaining to residential districts
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report.
Council Member Rog noted the required alley access with the minimum lot width being 10 feet
narrower and asked why the lot is less and if it is because there is no driveway. Mr. Morrison
stated yes and added that the additional width for lots without alley access can accommodate a
driveway to get to the backyard, or an attached garage.
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 5
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
Council Member Rog stated a concern she has about folks accessing alleys and plowing of alleys
and if this will be a higher priority in the future.
Karen Dorn, 2817 Quentin Avenue, asked if Rock Island is designated as open space. She stated
she is also concerned about efforts to increase the density in St. Louis Park. She shared
concerns about traffic, air quality, noise pollution, congestion and parking on roads in N1
neighborhoods. When looking at duplexes and triplexes, she noted that already many existing
single family houses do not have room to park because they have single-car garages or have
driveways that do not accommodate three cars. The proposed code would allow duplexes to
have up to six cars on the property and that is a lot of traffic in any given neighborhood. She is
finding that many residents have not engaged with this process, been informed, or expressed
their thoughts and opinions on how the proposed changes affect residential neighborhoods.
She has concerns about a triplex next door to her home and thinks there are more appropriate
locations for triplexes, such as high transit corridors. She asked the council to reconsider the
proposal and have a limited allowance for triplexes. She added there will be an increase in
rental properties; she already has three houses across the street from her that are rentals. She
shared the opinion that people who are renting do not get committed or involved in the
neighborhood and the upkeep of properties is generally lax. She is concerned with accessory
dwelling units (ADUs) being located five feet away from her backyard. She has lost her privacy
in her backyard and that proximity is inappropriate. She added there needs to be distance,
nature, space, clean air and privacy.
Council Member Brausen asked about the mechanism related to the change in the
recommendation for four of the parcels the city owns and if the council had discussed at a
study session. He asked if the planning commission changed the planned zoning on two of
these parcels. Mr. Walther responded affirmatively. Mr. Walther stated this was discussed by
city council and a clear majority of four council members agreed to keep parcels open for
potential future development. Staff’s recommendations was meant to uphold the status quo
with regard to the zoning and land use guidance and require additional public feedback before
action was taken. He stated this was presented at the planning commission, parks and
recreation advisory commission, and environment and sustainability commission meetings as
well. All input was brought to the planning commission, as well as public input, and the
planning commission's recommendation was to zone two of the parcels entirely park and open
space, instead of partially N1 as staff proposed.
Mr. Walther continued that staff’s practice is to bring the planning commission’s
recommendations to council. Council Member Brausen asked if the environment and
sustainability commission sent a recommendation to the planning commission. Mr. Walther
stated yes, that is correct.
Council Member Brausen stated all the parcels were discussed by the council and the
consensus was to zone these two parcels N1. He stated he is not sure this proposal from the
planning commission still reflects that consensus. He asked if it would require five council
member votes later on to rezone the parcels to N1 if it is considered in the future.
Mr. Walther stated for the zoning change, state statute requires a simple majority. If there is a
change in the comprehensive plan, which is the case for both sites, then that requires five votes
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 6
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
from city council. He said 3940 France Avenue is currently guided as park and open space in the
comprehensive plan, and 2800 Toledo Avenue is shown as right-of-way in the comprehensive
plan. He stated in either case, a comprehensive plan amendment will be required to develop
the property, despite any decision made this evening.
Council Member Brausen stated he appreciates that, and asked if the council is making a
comprehensive plan amendment if five votes are received today. Mr. Walther stated staff did
not propose land changes to these parcels because there was not clear support from five
council members, so staff was looking only to change the zoning. He stated the N1 zoning is
not in conflict with the comprehensive plan designation plan, but if the council were looking to
move ahead with a development, there would need to be a comprehensive plan amendment.
Council Member Rog noted the Rock Island proposal is eight-tenths of an acre, so this is a tiny
plot that folks are working to preserve with a recommendation from the planning commission.
If it is kept as-is, a large group of community advocates would be required to continue to
preserve the space. She stated the council could rezone this space as park and open space,
which would generate goodwill. As the representative of Ward 1, she stated the council needs
to listen to community on this issue. She is pleased that the planning commission unanimously
advocated to preserve the small open space for the community.
Council Member Baudhuin stated there are many held values that come into conflict with open
space, especially with a massive lack of housing in the community. He stated the city must start
doing some things differently or they will keep getting the same result. People’s concerns are
very valid, but there is not a lot of data to support that the proposed reality can come to
fruition. He stated he is in favor of the proposal and thanked staff for their hard work on the
issue. He noted the city has to do more on housing, especially with a nationwide crisis. This city
should be open to all and be affordable; it is not. He appreciates and has read all the feedback
from residents. He stated he is hopeful the city will be a better and more diverse community
because of finding a balance.
Council Member Brausen agreed and added it is a tough decision. He is in favor of park and
open space, and at the same time, is aware of the need for additional housing and of those who
cannot afford to purchase a house in St. Louis Park because it is too expensive. He stated the
city must provide for all, but it is hard to balance these competing interests.
Council Member Dumalag commented on the four city parcels and noted that the council’s
direction was not unanimous and somewhat close. She stated for 3940 France Avenue her
opinion was in the context of the neighboring city having recently taken actions to address
flooding concerns and she wanted some open space and natural habitat to be preserved in this
area. She is looking at the four parcels in the context of what is coming before council. She
acknowledged the need for housing and that folks do need open spaces. She will support the
two parcels to be zoned park and open space because of the context being discussed tonight.
Council Member Rog agreed that putting this in context makes sense. Many more
developments are being created for affordable housing, while also keeping open spaces that
the community values and anyone can use.
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 7
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
Council Member Rog thanked staff for their hard work in getting the city to this point. She
stated staff acted on the direction the community expressed through the visioning processes
and reinforced over many years and the adjustments that were made based on that input.
These proposed changes help meet city goals and provide a broad range of housing options for
current and future residents.
Council Member Rog stated staff has also taken steps to address the wishes of the council and
the community to preserve the character of residential neighborhoods. She gave the example
of maintaining current footprint, yard and height requirements in single-family neighborhoods,
which make up most of the residential land in the community. Staff created opportunities for
new types of housing that residents have been asking for as well, such as bungalows,
townhomes, twin homes, courtyard-style homes and cottages.
Council Member Rog added her thanks to staff for acknowledging the petition received via
Change.org which asked the council to pause on approving these changes. As of about a week
ago, over 300 people had signed the petition and only about sixty were people who live in St.
Louis Park. She stated it looked like the rest of the petition signers were from other cities and
states. As she read the petition, she looked at the names and recognized some of them as
constituents or friends.
Council Member Rog noted that over the weekend, she communicated with a Ward 1 resident
who had signed the petition and reached out to her directly with questions. Through
conversation, she was able to correct some misperceptions, including that a triplex could be
built on any parcel where a single-family home currently stands. Council Member Rog added
she shared data on home values that show property taxes have not historically been impacted
and noted the resident felt better after hearing this and was ready to support the changes. She
is hopeful that others who signed the petition or have unanswered questions will reach out to
her, to city staff, or to other council members to discuss their concerns.
Council Member Rog noted her lingering concern is that over time, these changes could impact
the availability of entry-level for sale single-family homes. While this is not inevitable, it does
seem possible if investors are allowed to buy up smaller homes, tear them down and construct
multifamily rental properties without limit, along with wanting to create more housing options
for all. She added the council has shown its support for wealth-building through home
ownership. She urged staff and the council to be vigilant about monitoring trends. She asked
them to be ready to respond with policies or other actions that will preserve for-sale housing
for individuals and families along with wealth-building. Limiting the activity of outside investors
in the housing in our community will be important as well. She is fully supportive of both of
staff’s recommendations and will vote to approve the first reading.
Council Member Budd added it is disconcerting to see so many signatures on the petition,
adding she did not know how many were from the city’s residents and how many were not. She
stated this feels different to her now because she was part of the open houses and part of the
listening sessions. She saw the care and the work that went into making sure the community
had access to this information.
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 8
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
Council Member Budd stated she tried to ascertain how many of the petition signers could be
in her Ward 3 because she would like to engage with them in discussion, especially regarding
comments about resulting reduction in enrollment in St. Louis Park schools, or resulting in
many teardowns. She noted there is a lot of fear of change in this proposal, but there are also
opportunities to seek better ways to stay on top of the change, including monitoring outside
investor properties as Council Member Rog noted. She stated she will be supporting the
recommendation.
Council Member Dumalag added she will also support the recommendations of staff. She noted
that housing has been an issue for many years in St. Louis Park, and she has been involved in
this issue for many years as well. When she was on Vision 3.0, a clear desire to have a variety
of housing options in the city was noted. The planning commission recommended an Accessory
Dwelling Unit (ADU) policy that was adopted, along with an inclusionary housing policy. The
work of creating more affordable homes specifically within St. Louis Park has been the goal.
When she would visit neighbors, she would often hear a concern that residents’ children or
grandchildren would not be able to afford a home in St. Louis Park.
Council Member Dumalag stated that when thinking about policy, the council needs to look at
what will allow more people to live here, and “missing middle” housing will help alleviate that
demand. People of diverse backgrounds also consider multi-generational living. When she
moved to St. Louis Park 20 years ago, the Ellipse was a development of concern. Over time, it
doubled property values and offers a restaurant and physician’s office. We do need to make
space for others to live in our community, and noted how residents have benefitted from living
in St. Louis Park. She stated that it is time that we share these benefits.
Mayor Mohamed stated she is in favor of all the recommendations, and stated we tackle
affordability in St. Louis Park with grants, funding, loans, and also through zoning. She added
when the council address zoning to allow for more diverse housing stock, it brings down the
demand. She stated she is happy about increasing affordability in the city. She added that she
heard a comment about renters not being invested in the community. She shared for the last
20 years she and her family have been renters in St. Louis Park. She noted firsthand experience
of seeing renters engage in the community. Owning a home is a privilege and some people
prefer to be renters. She stated the city loves renters and homeowners and promotes both
renting and homeownership.
Council Member Farris agreed with all the previous comments. She stated she works three jobs
and cannot afford to buy a home, but hopes someday to rent a home.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to adopt
Resolution No. 25- 037 to approve amendments to the comprehensive plan as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Dumalag, to approve the
first reading of zoning ordinance amendments pertaining to residential districts and to set the
second reading for March 3, 2025.
The motion passed 7-0.
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 9
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
e. First reading of ordinance amending city code Chapter 2 regarding boards and
commissions
Mr. Coleman presented the staff report.
Council Member Budd asked about proposed term limits. Mr. Coleman stated this was
discussed in the study session held May 20, 2024, and several council members agreed to the
implementation of term limits.
Council Member Budd asked how many individuals the term limits will impact. Mr. Coleman
stated that the change would be effective in June 2025, and it will take time for the entire
process of appointments and term limits to correct itself. He noted staff could follow up with
more information on how many existing commissioners may be impacted.
Council Member Budd noted if some commissioners had been serving for a long time and
sought reappointment, they were re-interviewed. She asked how those positions were filled.
Mr. Coleman stated once term limits were met, specifically for those who are filling seats that
were vacant as a result of the redesign project, commissioners would then able to apply for
reappointment and be allowed to serve two consecutive three-year terms. He added this
situation was unique because of the number of vacancies that existed. Ms. Brodeen added the
term limits would apply to any new appointment processes going forward, so if someone has
been a current member who has served two three-year terms, they would be ineligible to
reapply. This gives others the opportunity to serve. The draft ordinance provides that the
individual would need to take a break for at least one term and could reapply in the future.
Council Member Rog stated she is concerned about the term-limit concept coming up now. She
added it is about a collection of individuals, and she feels strange discussing the question now.
She stated this may be surprising for some commissioners who may be done with their term in
June, and added she is not comfortable about voting on this tonight.
Ms. Brodeen stated staff’s understanding based on previous discussions was that the council
supported term limits, but noted it is ultimately up to the council to decide. She stated term
limits are considered best practice, but encouraged council to discuss further before any
decisions are finalized.
Council Member Dumalag stated the council did previously discuss term limits. She stated in
that meeting, the council discussed how it is normal good governance to have term limits as
well as to have a pipeline to serve on boards and commissions.
Council Member Dumalag noted her experience on the planning commission. When certain
commissioners were not reappointed, hard feelings could result because there was not another
way to say that it was time for other voices to be heard. Boards and commissions are a political
appointment and term limits are a way to have other voices in the room and allow for
leadership while in these seats.
Council Member Brausen added he is also a proponent of term limits and that it allows others
the opportunity to serve and develop their leadership skills. If they like serving, they can take a
Study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 4a) Page 10
Title: City council meeting minutes of February 18, 2025
short-term break and then serve again at a later date. He stated this gives a structure to have
regular turnover. He stated he supports term limits.
Council Member Baudhuin stated he also supports term limits and appreciates staff’s work on
this recommendation. He stated the boards and commissions work has come to a good place
and he will support it.
Council Member Rog added she agrees with term limits. She clarified that her concern is that
term limits might come as a surprise to some that are serving now on boards and commissions.
She asked if a person’s two terms is completed, would they be able to apply immediately to
another board or commission. Ms. Brodeen confirmed that they could.
Council Member Rog also asked if the housing authority is also moving to three-year terms. Mr.
Coleman explained state statute requires that the terms for members of the housing authority
be five years.
Mayor Mohamed thanked staff and council for their work on this and she will also support this
as well as the term limits.
Motion by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to approve first
reading of ordinance amending city code Chapter 2 regarding boards and commissions and to
set the second reading for March 3, 2025.
The motion passed 6-1 (Council Member Budd opposed).
8. Communications and announcements.
Ms. Keller stated information on the Vision 4.0 process is now on the city website. She added
the community committee will kick off their work on Thursday, Feb 20. This is a smaller cohort
of people who will help champion and shape the work and act as ambassadors to help bridge
the gap between the community and city staff and to increase engagement and participation.
Council Member Baudhuin complimented the St. Louis Park Theatre Department which made it
to the one-act festival this year. He noted this is a huge accomplishment and the first time in
many years.
9. Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 8:26 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Consent agenda item: 5a
Executive summary
Title: Accept donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Parks and Recreation
summer concert series
Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution approving acceptance of a monetary
donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park in the amount of $4,395.68 for the Parks and
Recreation summer concert series.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use?
Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is
necessary to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of
each donation prior to it being expended.
The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park is graciously donating an amount of $4,395.68. The donation is
given with the restriction that it be used toward the summer concert series , which provides
free weekly music performances, June through August.
The Rotary Club of St. Louis Park accepted donations at the Annual Bundled Up! event held on
Jan. 25, 2025. The donations received are provided to support the Parks and Recreation
Department’s summer concert series. The summer concert series is budgeted in the Organized
Recreation budget.
Financial or budget considerations: This donation will be used to support the Parks and
Recreation Department’s summer concert series. The concert series is budgeted in the
Organized Recreation budget.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Reviewed by: Jason T. West, director of parks and recreation
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5a) Page 2
Title: Accept donation from the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park for the Parks and Recreation summer concert series
Resolution No. 25-____
Approving acceptance of donation in the amount of $4,395.68
to be used for the Parks and Recreation summer concert series
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by state statute to authorize acceptance
of any donations; and
Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the
donor; and
Whereas, the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park donated $4,395.68 to assist in the funding of
the Parks and Recreation Department’s summer concert series ,
Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that the gift
is hereby accepted with thanks to the Rotary Club of St. Louis Park with the understanding that
it must be used to assist in funding the Parks and Recreation Department’s summer concert
series.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 17, 2025:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Consent agenda item: 5b
Executive summary
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development -
Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1
Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading of ordinance adding section 36-268-
PUD 26 to the zoning code and amending the zoning map from R-4 multiple family residence to
PUD 26.
Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed development?
Summary: Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) applied for preliminary and final
plat and planned unit development (PUD) for the properties at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707
Minnetonka Blvd. The applicant proposes to construct four twin homes with eight total units
fronting Minnetonka Boulevard. These will be zero lot line structures with one shared wall. Each
lot would include an owner-occupied dwelling, enclosed garage stall, and greenspace. The
homes will be sold under a community land trust with Homes within Reach ensuring long-term
affordable home ownership.
The planning commission held a public hearing for the project on Feb. 5, 2025; they received a
written comment asking about parking and trash collection for the property. The planning
commission voted unanimously to recommend approval.
The city council approved the first reading of the PUD ordinance on March 3, 2025. There was
no additional public comment at that time. The council also approved the preliminary and final
plat associated with the development, subject to adoption of the PUD.
Financial or budget considerations: The economic development authority (EDA) owns the
subject properties and has partnered with the developer and the land trust to construct the
houses. The developer will purchase the property from the EDA at fair market value. The EDA
anticipates utilizing a federal grant and potentially funding through the city’s affordable housing
trust fund to offset construction costs so the houses can be sold at an affordable price.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Discussion, PUD ordinance and summary for publication, zoning map
amendment exhibit, PUD plan set
Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 2
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Discussion
Site information: The proposed development is located on four parcels on the south side of
Minnetonka Boulevard, west of Lake Street. The city obtained the four properties and
demolished four single-unit detached dwellings, with the intention of developing new
affordable, owner-occupied housing types in the city.
The westernmost parcel is separated from the other three by a public alley, as well as a sliver of
private property owned by the Colonial Apartments, which is located to the east of the project
site.
Site area (acres): Total site area: 0.60 ac. (26,160 sq. ft.)
5639 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.15 ac. (6,442 sq. ft.)
5643 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.15 ac. (6,535 sq. ft.)
5647 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.14 ac. (6,293 sq. ft.)
5707 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.16 ac. (6,890 sq. ft.)
Minnetonka Blvd.
5707 5647
5643 5639
5801 Mtka Blvd
Spirit of Christ
Community Church
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 3
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Current use:
Vacant / four demolished single-unit
detached dwellings
Surrounding land uses:
North: Single-unit detached dwellings
East: Apartment dwellings
South: Parking lot for adjacent
apartments
West: Religious institution
Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning
RM - medium density residential R-4 multiple-family residence
Proposed 2040 land use guidance Proposed zoning
RM - medium density residential PUD planned unit development
Background: On July 6, 2021, the EDA entered into a preliminary development agreement with
Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) to pursue development of owner-occupied
affordable housing on four, EDA-owned, single-family properties located at 5639, 5643, 5647
and 5707 Minnetonka Boulevard.
GMHC is partnering with Homes within Reach Community Land Trust which will establish a land
trust on the properties prior to selling them to low-income qualified home buyers with the goal
to provide several of the units to first-generation home buyers. Additionally, it is a goal of the
land trust to sell several of the units to first-generation homebuyers.
GMHC proposes to develop four twin homes on the site providing eight affordable home
ownership opportunities. The units would be affordable to households earning up to 60 to 80
percent of area median income. The new twin homes would be constructed as zero lot line
structures with one shared wall. Each lot would include an owner-occupied dwelling unit, an
enclosed garage stall, and greenspace. GMHC plans to utilize design assistance programs to
predict the homes’ energy usage as well as energy saving strategies to meet the city’s green
building policy. In addition to the twin homes, the project proposes to regrade and pave the city
alley, which is currently too steep to pave.
Present considerations:
The applicant requests the city:
1.Approve a preliminary and final plat to create eight individual lots – city council
approved this request on March 3, 2025
2.Amend the zoning map and zoning ordinance to rezone the subject properties from R-4
–multiple family residential to PUD – planned unit development.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 4
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Site plan
PUD analysis
Description
The developer requests approval of a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). A
PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment that establishes the regulations for a specific
property. The site is currently zoned R-4 multiple-family residential.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 5
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Building and site design analysis
The Minnetonka Blvd Twin Homes project meets the PUD ordinance goals for building and site
design. The ordinance requires the city to find that the quality of building and site design
proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied:
(1)The design shall consider the project as a whole and shall create a unified environment
within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures,
efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site
features, and design and efficient use of utilities.
Staff finds the plan meets this requirement.
(2)The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land
uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of
the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding
land uses on the PUD.
Staff finds the plan meets this requirement.
(3)A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy.
The developer will utilize Xcel Energy’s High Efficiency New Homes program to meet the
city’s Green Building Policy for twin homes. Staff finds the plans meet this requirement.
(4)The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged.
The design of the buildings has an emphasis on energy efficiency. Staff finds the plans
meet this requirement.
(5)A PUD shall comply with the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy.
All units are intended to be affordable ownership opportunities for households earning
60 to 80 percent of area median income (AMI). Staff finds the plans meet this
requirement.
Zoning analysis
This development was designed to meet the city’s proposed zoning standards that are currently
going through the review process. Because of the timing of this application versus the code
update, the developer chose to obtain a PUD, but worked with city staff to meet the standards
of the proposed N-2 district as much as possible.
The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans,
establish the development requirements for this property if approved. Further details on some
of the zoning items are provided below.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 6
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Zoning compliance table
Factor Required Proposed Met?
Uses PUD can establish Two-unit attached dwellings (twin
homes)
Yes
Dimensional Standards & Densities
Min. Lot Area PUDs less than 2.0 acres may be
approved only if it demonstrates
superior design and greater
compliance with comprehensive
plan goals and policies can be
attained through use of a PUD.
0.6 acres Yes
Floor Area Ratio PUD can establish Floor area: 18,899 sq. ft.
Lot area: 26,252 sq. ft.
FAR: 0.72
Yes
Dwelling Units n/a 8 dwelling units
3-bedroom: 4 units
4-bedroom: 4 units
Yes
Density (units per
acre)
Comprehensive Plan: RM land
use: 6-30 units/acre
13.3 units/acre Yes
Building Height PUD can establish 2.5 stories – 26.4 feet Yes
Setbacks PUD can establish Front: 25 feet
Rear: 25 feet
Side for shared wall: 0 feet
Side, interior: 5 feet
Yes
Off-Street Parking
Vehicle Parking Two-family – 2 spaces per
dwelling unit (8 units): 16 spaces
Each unit: 1 garage space, 1
driveway space
Yes
EV Parking No EV stations required None Yes
Bicycle Parking No bicycle parking spaces are
required
None Yes
Landscaping
Minimum
Landscaping
Tree Requirement: 1 tree per lot
in the boulevard (8 trees)
Shrub Requirement: no shrub
requirement
Boulevard already has 4 trees:
due to future Hennepin County
road construction (2028) no more
trees proposed within the
boulevard
Canopy trees: 9 canopy + 24
evergreen
Ornamental trees: 25 ornamental
Shrubs: 53 shrubs
Yes
Tree removal /
replacement Total inches on site: 236
Total inches removed: 236
Tree replacement: 283
inches
Proposed: 52 trees at 130 caliper
inches
Remainder: 153 inches at $225
per inch
Fee-in-lieu: $34,470
Yes
Impervious Surface PUD can establish 45% impervious Yes
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 7
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Factor Required Proposed Met?
(maximum of 60% is standard in
the proposed N-2 district)
Architectural design
Building Materials
Class 1: 60% min faces visible
off-site
Class 3: 10% max
Face Class 1 Class 2 Yes
North 66% 34%
East 62% 38%
South 66% 34%
West 62% 38%
Use
The project is a single-phase residential development with eight two-unit attached dwellings
(twin homes). Four of the dwellings are three-bedroom units and four of the dwellings are four-
bedroom units. Each individual unit includes a one-stall attached garage, in-unit laundry, a rear
deck, and front porch/patio space for outdoor recreation.
Inclusionary housing policy
The proposed development would provide long-term affordability for owner-occupied housing
units, as the homes would be sold to households with incomes between 60 and 80 percent area
median income and the land would be held in a land trust for 99 years allowing long term
affordability to the first and future owners.
Climate action plan
The development will adhere to the city’s green building policy as amended in 2022 and intends
to utilize Xcel Energy’s High Efficiency New Homes program to receive free design assistance
that predicts energy usage, suggests potential energy saving strategies and estimates energy
cost savings. The development will also include the following sustainable features:
•Electric heating and appliances
•Best management practices (BMPs) for stormwater management, including raingardens
Architectural design
The buildings in the development were designed to meet the city’s proposed zoning code’s
“house-scale” standards. The buildings are limited to 2.5 stories, and have gabled roofs and
visual interest with the front porches that fit within the character of the neighborhood’s single-
unit detached dwellings. The development has two different unit types, each with their own
architectural details, allowing the development as a whole to look cohesive but not exactly the
same.
Vehicular parking
The zoning ordinance requires two parking spaces per unit for two-unit dwellings. The applicant
proposes each unit to have a one-stall attached garage as well as enough driveway space for a
second vehicle. Staff find it meets vehicular parking requirements.
Electric vehicle parking
The zoning ordinance does not require EV parking for two-unit dwellings.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 8
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Bicycle parking
The zoning ordinance does not require bicycle parking for two-unit dwellings, but each unit has
an attached garage that could be used for bicycle parking alongside vehicle parking.
Landscaping
Tree preservation on the site is challenging due to the required site grading and the added
density of the development. As a result, the developer proposes a combination of tree
replacement plantings and payment in lieu to meet the city replacement requirements.
There are a number of trees on the site, including several dead or diseased trees that are
proposed to be removed from the site. A total of 236 caliper inches of significant trees exist on
the site, and the developer proposes removal of all 236 caliper inches. Because the application
was received in 2024, the project will use the city’s 2024 tree replacement calculation: ((A/B)-
0.2)*B)*1.5, resulting in 283 caliper inches needed in replacement. The developer proposes to
plant 52 trees as part of the project, resulting in 130 caliper inches being planted. After
subtracting the planned plantings, the remaining 153 caliper inches will be paid into the tree
replacement fund, at $225 per caliper inch, resulting in a fee of $34,470.
For planting requirements, the zoning ordinance requires one boulevard tree per lot; there are
no shrub planting requirements for twin homes. The boulevard already has four trees; the
remaining four trees will not be added to the boulevard because Hennepin County will be
reconstructing that portion of Minnetonka Boulevard in 2028. Instead, the required plantings
will be on the property. The plan meets the city’s requirements.
The plan proposes to plant nine deciduous canopy trees and 24 coniferous canopy trees, as well
as 25 ornamental trees. The plan also includes 53 shrub plantings.
Signs
There are no signs proposed for the project, beyond address numbers.
Utilities
Each property will have individual utility services. There is capacity within the city’s utilities for
the additional dwelling units added by this project.
Neighborhood meeting: The developer held a neighborhood meeting introducing the
development to community members on Sept. 25, 2024. Six members of the public and a city
council member attended the meeting. Community members asked questions about the level
of affordability of the housing, long-term maintenance of the properties and buildings, and
specifics about sale process and eligibility.
Planning commission and public hearing: The planning commission held a public hearing for
the applications on Feb. 5, 2025. One written comment was distributed to planning
commissioners at the meeting. There were no members of the public present. Planning
commissioners made note of minor concerns about the lack of on-street parking or guest
parking options, as well as the proximity of the homes to Minnetonka Boulevard, as a busy
street. The commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the requested
applications with conditions presented by staff.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 9
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
City council: On March 3, 2025, the city council approved the preliminary and final plat for the
project via resolution. The council also approved the first reading of the PUD zoning ordinance
amendment and rezoning.
Recommendations: The planning commission and city staff recommend the following:
Approval of the preliminary and final planned unit development for 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707
Minnetonka Blvd. subject to the following conditions:
i.The city council’s conditions of planned unit development approval.
ii.Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure.
iii.Easement related to driveway access across the properties at 5703 and 5707
Minnetonka Blvd.
iv.The mayor and city manager are authorized to execute said planning
development contract.
1.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of
this ordinance, approved official exhibits and city code.
2.All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be
buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100%
screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials.
3.Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met:
a.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development,
construction, private utility and city representatives.
b.All necessary permits shall be obtained.
4.Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met:
a.A planning development contract shall be executed between the developer and
city that addresses, at a minimum:
i.The city council’s conditions of planned unit development approval.
ii.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to,
alleys, sidewalks, boulevards and the execution of necessary easements
related to such improvements.
iii.Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure.
iv.Easement related to driveway access across the properties at 5703 and
5707 Minnetonka Blvd.
v.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter
of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of
1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (alleys, sidewalks and
boulevards), raingardens and landscaping.
vi.The developer shall reimburse city attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing
such documents as required in the final PUD approval.
vii.The mayor and city manager are authorized to execute said planning
development contract.
b.Final construction plans for all public improvements and raingardens shall be
signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the city engineer for review
and approval.
5.The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction:
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 10
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
a. All city noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no
construction activity between the hours of 8 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through
Friday, and between 8 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays.
b.The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties.
c.Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
d.The city shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public
street.
e.Work in a public street or alley shall take place only upon the determination by
the city engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been
taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety.
f.The developer shall install appropriate security measures.
g.Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding
neighborhood service.
6.Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy the following shall be
completed:
a.Public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation, and
stormwater best management practices shall be installed in accordance with the
official exhibits.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 11
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Ordinance No. ___-25
Amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating Section 36-
268-PUD 26 as a Planned Unit Development Zoning District for the properties
located at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd.
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning
commission (Case No. 24-24-S and 24-25-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-
268-PUD 26.
Section 2. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the lands legally described in
Exhibit A from R-4 to PUD 26.
Section 3. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add
the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District:
Section 36-268-PUD 26
(a)Development Plans.
The site located on properties legally described as Lots 1-2, Block 1 and Lots 1-6, Block 2,
Minnetonka Blvd Twin Homes Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be
developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD approved
Official Exhibits:
G100 Cover Sheet
C000 Certificate Survey
C001 Construction Notes
C002 Construction Notes
C100 Existing Conditions & Removals
C200 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan
C201 Erosion & Sediment Control Details
C300 Site Plan
C400 Grading Plan
C500 Utility Plan
C900 Construction Details
C901 Construction Details
A000 General Development Plan
A100 Architectural Project Site Plan
A110 Project Site Area Plan
A200 House Type A - LL & ML Floor Plans
A210 House Type A - UL Floor Plans & Roof Plans
A220 House Type A - Exterior Elevations
A300 House Type B - LL & ML Floor Plans
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 12
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
A310 House Type B - UL Floor Plans & Roof Plans
A320 House Type B - Exterior Elevations
L100 Landscape Plan
L100.1 Landscape Details
L200 Tree Inventory Plan
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
The Site shall also conform to the following requirements:
1.The properties shall be developed with four twin home buildings, providing eight
dwelling units.
2.The maximum height shall not exceed 27 feet and 2.5 stories
3.Parking shall be provided off-street in individual garages attached to each
dwelling unit and individual driveways connecting each garage to the alley.
(b)Uses.
(1)Permitted uses:
The following uses are permitted in PUD 26:
a.Two-unit attached dwellings (twin homes).
(3)Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted in PUD 26 if the use complies
with the conditions specified for the use in this subsection:
a.Home occupations as regulated by this chapter.
b.Gardens.
c.Outdoor storage is prohibited.
(c)Special Performance Standards.
(1)All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall
be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, transparency, architectural
design, landscaping, parking, fencing and screening requirements.
(2)All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers
shall be kept in the manner required by this Code.
(3)Signs shall be allowed in conformance with the N-2 zoning district.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication.
First reading March 3, 2025
Second reading March 17, 2025
Date of publication March 27, 2025
Date ordinance takes effect April 11, 2025
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 13
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 17, 2025:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b) Page 14
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard
Twin Homes - Ward 1
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. ____-25
Amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating Section 36-
268-PUD 26 as a Planned Unit Development Zoning District for the properties
located at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd.
This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the properties located at 5639,
5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd. from R4 multiple family residence to PUD 26; and the
Zoning Code Section 36-268 will be amended to add Section 36-268-PUD 26.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication and no sooner than April 11, 2025.
Adopted by the city council March 17, 2025
Nadia Mohamed /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sun Sailor: March 27, 2025
LAKE STW VERNON AVE SMI
N
N
E
T
O
N
K
ABLV
D
MINNETONKA BLVD
M
I
N
N
E
T
O
NKA
BL
V
DZARTHAN AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SXENWOOD AVE SWEBSTER AVE SLAKE STW VERNON AVE SMI
N
N
E
T
O
N
K
ABLVD
MINNETONKA BLVD
M
I
N
N
E
T
O
N
K
A
BLV
DZARTHAN AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SXENWOOD AVE SWEBSTER AVE SPOS Park and Open Space
R‐1 Single‐Family Residence
R‐2 Single‐Family Residence
R‐3 Two ‐Family Residence
R‐4 MulƟple‐Family Residence
R‐C High‐Density MulƟple Family
MX‐1 Ver Ɵcal Mixed‐Use
MX‐2 Neighborhood Mixed‐Use
C‐1 Neighborhood Commercial
C‐2 General Commercial
BP Business Park
O Office
I‐P Industrial Park
I‐G General Industrial
PUD Planned Unit Development
ExisƟng Zoning
R‐4 MulƟple family residenƟal
Proposed Zoning
PUD Planned Unit Development
¯
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5b)
Title: Second reading and adoption of zoning ordinance for planned unit development - Minnetonka Boulevard Twin Homes - Ward 1 Page 15
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
$$
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
%%
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
%%
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
$$
$//(<
(
$
6
(
0
(
1
7
6(7%$&.
6(7%$&.
6(7%$&.
352326('
(;,67,1*
352326('
352326('
352326('
352326('
(;,67,1*
(;,67,1*
352326('
352326('
352326('
6,'(
<
$
5'6(7%$&.
7
<
3,&$/
)5217
<$5'6(7
%$&.
7<3,&$/
)5217
<$5'6(7
%$&.
7<3,&$/
)5217
<$5'6(7
%$&.
7<3,&$/
5($5
<$5'6(7
%$&.
7<3,&$/
3523(57< /,1( 72)281'$7,21 :$//
3523(57< /,1( 72 )281'$7,21 :$//
0,1
0,1
6+$5(''5,9(35,9$7('5,9(
9,)%8,/',1*
',0(16,216
%8,/',1*
',0(16,216
*(1(5$/'(9(/230(173/$1
6FDOH
$
)7
(;,67,1*813$9('$//(<
72%(5(*5$'('$1'
3$9(':,7+&21&5(7(
(;,67,1*
&21&5(7(
6,'(:$/.
7+,63523(57<72%(
,1&/8'(',17+(29(5$//
352-(&76,7(:25.
%876(3$5$7()520
,1',9,'8$/+286(
3523(57,(6
0LQQHWRQND%OYG
)5217
&21&5(7(
:$//7<3
)5217325&+
$1'(175<
5($5'5,9(:$<
29(5+($'
*$5$*('225
'(&25$7,9(
/2:)(1&(
7<3
(15<0$5.(5
)($785(
1(:+,*+
5(7$,1,1*
:$//
1(:/2:
5(7$,1,1*
:$//
(;,67,1*
$//(<
5($5(175<
(*5(66
:,1'2:
:(//)521767(36
(;,67,1*813$9('$//(<
72%(5(*5$'('$1'
3$9(':,7+&21&5(7(
325&+ 325&+325&+ 325&+
325&+325&+
325&+325&+
'(&.'(&.
'(&.'(&.
'(&.'(&.'(&.'(&.
$
*(1(5$/
'(9(/230(17
3/$1
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW5HFRUG6HWV38'&,7<5(6321&()2/'(538'UHVSRQFH9:&DGGUDZLQJV38' 6LWH0RGHO0LQQHWRQND%OGYFRS\YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
352-(&76,7(
:25.
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
+286(7<3(6
$
%
+268(
7<3($
+268(
7<3(%
6,7(3/$1/(*(1'
3523(57<
/,1(
/,1(2)6(7
%$&.
/,1(2)
)(1&(
+2855$7('
:$//
0,1&/5
5
Purpose of Standard
District Housing Type
2525
Spacing &
Scale
Rear Yard
Setback
Minimum
(feet)
Dwelling, attached two-unit (twinhomes)N-2 5
Spacing &
Scale
Front Yard
Setback
Minimum
(feet)
Side
Interior
Yard
Setback
Minimum
(feet) for
Attached
Garage or
Lot with
Alley
5
38'&,7<&200(176
):$/.:
VTIW
):$/.(
VTIW
/27(
VTIW /27:
VTIW /27 (
VTIW /27:
VTIW /27:
VTIW
/27(
VTIW
/27:
VTIW
+286(:
VTIW
325&+:
VTIW
5:$/.:
VTIW
+286((
VT
I
W
325&+(
VTIW
5:$/.(
VT IW
&21&
3
$
'
:
VTIW
&21&3$'(VT IW
'5,9(
:
VT
I
W
'5,9((
VT
I
W
):$/.:
VTIW
):$/.(
VTIW
+286(:
VTIW
325&+:
VTIW
5:$/.:
VT
I
W
+286(( VTIW
325&+(
VTIW
5:$/.(
VT
I
W
&21&3$':VTIW
&21&3$'(VT IW
'5,9(:
VTIW '5,9((
VTIW
):$/.:
VTIW
+286(
:
VTIW
325&+
:
VTIW
5:$/.:
VTIW
&21&3$':VTIW
'5,9(:
VT
I
W
/27(
VTIW
):$/.(
VTIW
+286((
VTIW
325&+
(
VT
I
W
5:$/.(
VT
I
W
&21&
3
$
'
(VTIW
'5,9((
VT
I
W
):$/.:
VTIW
+286(:
VTIW
325&+:
VTIW
5:$/.:
VTIW
&21&
3
$
'
:
VT
I
W
'5,9(:
VT
I
W
):$/.(
VTIW
+286((
VTIW
325&+
(
VT
I
W
5 :$/.
(
VT
I
W
&21&3$'(
VT
I
W
'5,9(
(
VTIW
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
$$
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
%%
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
%%
+286(
:(67
+286(
($67
$$
352-(&7$5($5()(5(1&(3/$1
6FDOH
$
)7
$
352-(&76,7(
$5($3/$1
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW5HFRUG6HWV38'&,7<5(6321&()2/'(538'UHVSRQFH9:&DGGUDZLQJV38' 6LWH0RGHO0LQQHWRQND%OGYFRS\YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
352-(&76,7(
:25.
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
*5281')/225$5($5$7,2&$/&
3(5/27 29(5$//6,7(
+286(:+286((+286(:+286((+286(:+286((+286(:+286((6,7(
$$%%%%$$/276
VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW %8,/',1*)22735,17$5($
VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW ,03(59,286$5($ :,7+287%8,/',1*
VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW 727$/*5266/27$5($
VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW 727$/,03(59,286$5($ %8,/',1*)22735,17,03(59,286
0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;727$/03(59,2865$7,2&$/& 727$/,03(59,286*5266/27
0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;*5281')/225$5($5$7,2&$/&/27&29(5$*( 35,0$5<%8,/',1**5266
5
5
$
352-(&76,7(
$5($3/$1
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW5HFRUG6HWV38'&,7<5(6321&()2/'(538'UHVSRQFH9:&DGGUDZLQJV38' 6LWH0RGHO0LQQHWRQND%OGYFRS\YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
5
38'&,7<&200(176
',1,1*
.,7&+(1
/,9,1*
+$/)%$7+83'2:1&/26(7
&(175$/+8%
325&+
'(&.
3$175<
/LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
0,1&/5
5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
+286(7<3($0$,1/(9(/3/2253/$16
6FDOH
$
$
$
$
+285:$//
$
+285:$//
$
+286(7<3($
// 0/)/225
3/$16
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
$8383+:
:$5'52%(
:$5'52%(
+:
:$5'52%(
:$5'52%(
%$7+
%('5220
2)),&(6725$*(
(175<
*$5$*(
0(&+
&/
0(&+
/LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
*DUDJH$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
0,1&/5
5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
+286(7<3($/2:(5/(9(/)/2253/$16
6FDOH
$
$
$
$
+285
:$//
(*5(66
:,1'2:
:(//
+285:$//
+285
:$//
$
$/7(51$7(
/2&$,721)25
(*5(66:,1'2:
:(//
325&+$%29(
)227,1*67%'
+285
:$//
5
38'&,7<&200(176
$
+286(7<3($
8/)/2253/$16
522)3/$16
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
$
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
%('5220
%('5220
&/
&/
/$81'5<
%$7+
&(17(5+$//
%('5220
&/'2:16((522)3/$1
)25325&+522)127(6
6((0$,1/(9(/3/$1
)25*$5$*(522)'(&.127(6
/LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
0,1&/5
5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
$
$
$
+286(7<3($833(5/(9(/)/2253/$16
6FDOH
$
$
+285:$//7281'(56,'(
2)522)'(&.
+285:$//72
81'(56,'(2)522)
'(&.
5
5325&+6/23('6
'6
'6
6/23(6/23(3(5)227'(&.6/23(
*877(5
*877(5
6/23(6/23(6/23('2:16
3287
'2:163287
127(
'2:163287(/%2:
$1'63$6+%/2&.
&225',1$7(:,7+
&,9,/
*877(5*877(5
*877(5
'2:163287
0,1&/5
5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
0/
//
//
0/
//
//'1'1*877(5
*877(5
'2:16
3287
'2:163287
*877(5 *877(5
*877(5325&+6/23(6/23(6/23(3(5)227'(&.6/23(6/23($
$
$
+286(7<3($522)3/$16
6FDOH
$
+286(%(/2:
6+2:1'$6+('
$
$5($2)5$7('522)'(&.
6+2:1+$7&+('
0,1
0,1
5
/,1(2)+285
5$7(':$//
%(/2:5$7('522)
'(&.
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
38'5(9,(:&200(17
5()
$
+286(7<3($
8/)/2253/$16
522)3/$16
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
$
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
5
38'&,7<&200(176
+286(7<3($1257+(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
0/)/225
8/)/225
//)/225
/3
3$1(/
(,)6
&/$''
&/$''
/3
1,&.(/
*$3
6287+(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
325&+
/,*+7
0/)/225
0/)/225
+286(7<3($:(67(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
8/)/225
:(67(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
&/$''
(,)6
/3 1,&.(/
*$3
#2+'225
//)/225
&/$''
+286(7<3($6287+(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
0/)/225
8/)/225
//)/225
6287+(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
'2:1/,*+7
'2:1/,*+7
&/$66
$&&(17
6,'(,1*
7%'
(,)6
/3 3$1(/
&/$''
#2+'225
0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66
/3 3$1(/
/3 1,&.(/*$3
&/$''
&/$''
/360227+3$1(/6,',1*
&2/25 $&&(17&2/257%'
/31,&.(/*$36,',1*
&2/25 0$7&+(,)6
:22'&20326,7&/$'',1*
%2$5'6
&2/25 '$5.*5$<%/$&.
:22'&20326,7&/$'',1*
%2$5'6
&2/25 0$7&+(,)6
+286(7<3($($67(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
0/)/225
8/)/225
//)/225
($67(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
#2+'225
&/$''
(,)6
/3 1,&.(/
*$3
0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66
(,)6 (;7(5,25,168/$7,21),1,6+,1*
6<67(0
&2/25 :+,7(/,*+77$1
$
+286(7<3($
(;7(5,25
(/(9$7,216
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
1RY3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
$
$
+286(7<3(%
// 8/)/225
3/$16
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
%
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
$
$
',1,1*
.,7&+(1
/,9,1*
+$/)%$7+
&(175$/+8%
'(&.
325&+
/LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
+286(7<3(%0$,1/(9(/3/2253/$16
6FDOH
$
$
$
+285:$//
+285:$//
+:+:
(175<
%('5220
&/
%$7+
/$81'5<
0(&+
*$5$*(
/LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
*DUDJH$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
+286(7<3(%/2:(5/(9(/)/2253/$16
6FDOH
$
$
$
$
$
(*5(66
:,1'2:
:(//
+285
:$//
+285
:$//
325&+$%29(
)227,1*67%'
5
$
+286(7<3(%
// 8/)/225
3/$16
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
%
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
5
38'&,7<&200(176
$
+286(7<3(%
8/)/2253/$16
522)3/$16
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
%
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
$
$
%('5220
%$7+
%('5220
&(17(5+$//
&/
&/
6((522)3/$1
)25325&+522)127(6
6((0$,1/(9(/3/$1
)25*$5$*(522)'(&.127(6
/LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6)
VTIW
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
+286(7<3(%833(5/(9(/)/2253/$16
6FDOH
$
$
$
+285:$//72
81'(56,'(2)
522)'(&.
+285:$//
72
81'(56,'(
2)522)
'(&.
5
5
$
$
325&+
6/23(
'6
'6
'6
6/23(6/23(3(5)227'(&.6/23(
'6
*877(5
*877(5
6/23(6/23('2:163287
127(
'2:163287(/%2:
$1'63$6+%/2&.
&225',1$7(:,7+
&,9,/
*877(5
*877(5
*877(5
'2:163287
*877(5
325&+
6/23(
'2:163287
'2:163287
'2:163287
//0/
//
0/
////
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
0,1&/5
0,1&/5
5
+286(7<3(%522)3/$16
6FDOH
$
+286(%(/2:
6+2:1'$6+('
$
$
$5($2)5$7('522)'(&.
6((%(8,/'1*$66(0%/,(6
0,1
0,1
5
/,1(2)+285
5$7(':$//
%(/2:5$7('522)
'(&.
5
38'&,7<&200(176
$
+286(7<3(%
(;7(5,25
(/(9$7,216
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
%
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
$
+286(7<3(%
(;7(5,25
(/(9$7,216
8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\ 5HYLHZHG%\ 7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU 0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21
67$03
5(9,6,21
[6KHHW6L]H
-DQ3ULQW'DWH
3URMHFW,'
LUNNING
ARCHITECTURE
WENDE
+ PLANNING
/XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF
(DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH
6DLQW3DXO01
S
,668('
+286(7<3(
%
38'6XEPLWWDO1RY
:(67(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
0/)/225
:(67(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
0/)/225
+286(7<3($:(67(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
8/)/225
&/$''
(,)6
#2+'225
//)/225
/3 % %
+286(7<3($1257+(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
0/)/225
8/)/225
//)/225
/3
3$1(/
(,)6
&/$''
6287+(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
325&+
/,*+7
/3
/$3
+286(7<3($6287+(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
0/)/225
8/)/225
//)/225
6287+(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
'2:1/,*+7
'2:1/,*+7
(,)6
/3 3$1(/
#2+'225
&/$''
5
+286(7<3($($67(/(9$7,21
6FDOH
$
0/)/225
8/)/225
($67(/(9$7,216
727$/$5($ 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$66 6)
&/$660$;
&/$''
(,)6
/3 % %
//)/225
#2+'225
0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66
/3 % %
/3 3$1(/
/3 /$3
&/$''
/3%$25' %$77(16,',1*
&2/257%'
/360227+3$1(/6,',1*
&2/25 $&&(17&2/257%'
/3/$36,',1*
&2/257%'
:22'&20326,7&/$'',1*
%2$5'6
&2/25 '$5.*5$<%/$&.
0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66
(,)6 (;7(5,25,168/$7,21),1,6+,1*
6<67(0
&2/25 :+,7(/,*+77$1
5
38'&,7<&200(176
90591090490690790890991189
5895900905910896897
898
899
901
9029039049069079089
0
9
9
1
1
9
1
2
91391490
0
900905910915901902903904906907908909911912913914916916
895900905910
892
893
894896897898899901
902
903904906907908909911
895
900
905
891892893894896
897
898
899
901902903904
906
895900
89
3
894896897898899901902
903
904
||||||||||||||||
||||
O FO FO FO FO
FO FO FO FO
////////////////|||////////|25////////////
////////////////K>ZK< E,/E>/E<& E FO
FO
ϲϬΗZW
dt/E >D
ϭϱΗ^,
25
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1
TYP
2
3
5
6
7
8
8
8
2
TYP
9
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
8
1
TYP
2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
5
6A
8
8
8
8 8
1A
1A
10
10
10
10
4
TYP
4
TYP
3
11
11
11 9
911
9
11 2
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5
13
APPROX
12
APPROX
13
APPROX
12
APPROX
12
APPROX
13
APPROX
13
APPROX
12
APPROX
h^ Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/> ͗͗Ͱh^ Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK: d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EE dKE<>sͲ>hEE/E't E ͰtKZ</E'&/> ^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^, d^ͰϭϬϬͲ ΘZ D͘t'W>Kd^> ͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd ͗ϭͬϲͬϮϬϮϱϭϮ͗ϰϯWDϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z & ZdK
KE^dZhd/KEEKd ^E
> ' EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ
dKd, ^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘
Ϯ͘ WZKd dED/Ed/EEz
y/^d/E'& dhZ ^EKd^,KtE
&KZZ DKs>͕Z >Kd/KE͕
^>s' ͕ d͘
ϯ͘ d, KEdZdKZ^,>>
d ZD/E d, /ZD E^E
D d,K^dKZ h d, Z
/^dhZ /Ed, Wh>/ZKt͘
ϰ͘ dKd, yd Ed& ^/> ͕d,
KEdZdKZ^,>>D/E/D/
d, Z ^K&/^dhZE dK
d, WZKWK^ /DWZKs D Ed
Z ;^Ϳ͘
ϱ͘ Z DKs y/^d/E'KEZ d
& dhZ ^; ͘'͕͘Ws D Ed͕
^/ t><͕hZE'hdd Z͕
d͘ͿdKE Z ^d:K/Ed>/E t/d,
&h>>Ͳ Wd,^thd^͘
ϲ͘ d, KEdZdKZ^,>>>Kd
y/^d/E'hE Z'ZKhE
hd/>/d/ ^/ED/EE dKE<>s
, K&KE^dZhd/KEdK
W ZD/dZ s/^/KE^dKd, W>E^͘
EKd ^
1
ϭ͘ Z DKs KEZ d WZKE
ϭ͘ Z DKs KEZ d
Ϯ͘ Z DKs /dhD/EKh^
ϯ͘ Z DKs 'Zs >
ϰ͘ Z DKs hZΘ'hdd Z
ϱ͘ Z DKs & E
ϲ͘ Z DKs Z d/E/E't>>
ϲ͘ Z DKs Z d/E/E't>>Θ^d W^
ϳ͘ Z DKs 'hZZ/>
ϴ͘ Z DKs dZ
ϵ͘ Z DKs>&KZWZKWK^ hd/>/dz
^ Zs/ ^
ϭϬ͘ Z DKs > EKhdϰΖ >Kt
'ZKhE͕WEEKE
^ Zs/
ϭϭ͘ ^thd
ϭϮ͘ /^KEE d y/^d/E'^E/dZz
^ Zs/ d^E/dZz^ t ZD/E
EEKE y/^d/E'
^E/dZz^ Zs/ W Z d/>
^EͲϲKEϵϬϬ͘
ϭϯ͘ /^KEE d y/^d/E'td Z
^ Zs/ dtd ZD/EE
EKE y/^d/E'td Z
^ Zs/ ͘
< zEKd ^Twin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc.
275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620
Saint Paul, MN 55101
p:651.221.0915
BENCHMARK(S) (BMs)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A
DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:
REG. NO.
CERTIFICATION
KATHRYN MELODY, P.E.
21770
NOT
F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
TI
O
N
NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL
EXISTING
CONDITIONS &
REMOVALS
Know what's
R
SBI
N
( IN FEET )
GRAPHIC SCALE
1
1 JAN. 7, 2025
PUD - CITY COMMENTS
1
1
////////////////25//
//////K>ZK< E,/E>/E<& E 25
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϵϭ
D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ
>>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ
WKZ,
;ϯ^d W^Ϳ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϳϱ
D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ
>>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ
ϱϳϵϱ
D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ
>>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϬϱ
D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ
>>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ
ϱϳϬϭ
D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ
>>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϰϱ
D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ
>>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ
ϱϳϳϭ
D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ
>>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ
ϱϳϰϭ
D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ
>>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ
^^
^
^
^
^^
^
^
^
^^
^
^
^
^^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^LoDLoDLoDLoD
LoDLoD
LoDLoDLoD
LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
LoDLoD
LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD
LoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD
LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
LoD LoDLoD
LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
6
6
6
6
1
TYP
1
TYP
2
TYP
5
TYP
5
TYP
7
7
TYP
7
8 2
TYP
1
TYP
1
TYP
2
TYP
2
TYP
3
3
3
4
4
4
4
5
TYP
7
TYP
A
9
1A
1A
1A
1A
1A
h^ Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/> ͗͗Ͱh^ Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK: d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EE dKE<>sͲ>hEE/E't E ͰtKZ</E'&/> ^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^, d^ͰϯϬϬͲ^/d ͘t'W>Kd^> ͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd ͗ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϱϴ͗ϯϳDTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc.
275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620
Saint Paul, MN 55101
p:651.221.0915
BENCHMARK(S) (BMs)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A
DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:
REG. NO.
CERTIFICATION
KATHRYN MELODY, P.E.
21770
NOT
F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
TI
O
N
NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL
SITE PLAN
ϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z & ZdK
KE^dZhd/KEEKd ^E
> ' EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ
dKd, ^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘
Ϯ͘ WZKWK^ hZΘ'hdd Z͕
/dhD/EKh^Ws D Ed͕E
^/ t><t/>> Z Yh/Z dK
KDDKd d, WZKWK^
^E/dZzEtd Z^ Zs/ ^͘
Z W> d, hZΘ'hdd Z͕
/dhD/EKh^Ws D Ed͕E
^/ t></E</E͘
ϯ͘ Z W> y/^d/E'KEZ d
& dhZ ^; ͘'͕͘Ws D Ed͕
^/ t><͕hZE'hdd Z͕
d͘ͿdKE Z ^d:K/Ed>/E ͘
EKd ^
1 < zEKd ^
ϭ͘ KEZ d ^/ t><
ϭ͘ KEZ d ^/ t><ͲDd,/E
</E
Ϯ͘ KEZ d Z/s tz
ϯ͘ KEZ d >> z;^ d/>
^dͲϭϭKEϵϬϬͿ
ϰ͘ KEZ d W&KZt^d
K>> d/KE/E^;^ Z,
W>E^Ϳ
ϱ͘ KEZ d hZE'hdd ZͲ
Dd,/E</E
ϲ͘ /dhD/EKh^Ws D EdͲDd,
/E</E
ϳ͘ Z d/E/E't>>
ϴ͘ WZKWK^ ^ D Ed
ϵ͘ KEZ d ^W>^,W
SBI
N
( IN FEET )
GRAPHIC SCALE
A ^/'E^, h>
W ZDEDhd
͘ KE tzKEKd Ed ZZϲͲϮ
;ϭϴΗyϮϰΗͿͲϭ^/'E
Know what's
R
1
1 JAN. 7, 2025
PUD - CITY COMMENTS
1
2 FEB. 19, 2025
PUD - CITY COMMENTS
2
//////////////////
//////ϲϬΗZW90591090490690790890991190
0
900905910915901902903904906907908909911912913914916916
895900905910
892
893
894896897898899901
902
903904906907908909911
895
900
905
891892893894896
897
898
899
901902903904
906
895900
89
3
894896897898899901902
903
904
89
5895900905910896897
898
899
901
9029039049069079089
0
9
9
1
1
9
1
2
913914WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϵϭ
D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ
>>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ
WKZ,
;ϯ^d W^Ϳ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϳϱ
D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ
>>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ
ϱϳϵϱ
D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ
>>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϬϱ
D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ
>>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ
ϱϳϬϭ
D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ
>>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
ϱϳϰϱ
D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ
>>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ
ϱϳϳϭ
D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ
>>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ
WKZ,
;ϭ^d WͿ
'Z'
dKKZ
ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ
ϱϳϰϭ
D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ
>>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ
^^
^
^
^
^^
^
^
^
^^
^
^
^
^^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^
^LoDLoDLoDLoD
LoDLoD
LoDLoDLoD
LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
LoDLoD
LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD
LoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD
LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
LoD LoDLoD
LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD
ϬнϬϬ
ϭнϬϬϮнϬϬϯнϬϬϯнϭϬ͘ϴϮͲϱ͘ϭйͲϰ͘ϯйͲϭ͘ϵйϬ͘ϯйͲϱ͘ϲйͲϰ͘ϭйͲϮ͘ϲйͲϭ͘ϬйͲϰ͘ϵйͲϯ͘ϯйͲϭ͘ϵйͲϬ͘ϮйϵϬϱ͘ϴϬͲϭ͘ϬйͲϭ͘ϳйͲϮ͘ϲйͲϯ͘ϰйͲϭ͘Ϭй
Ͳϯ͘ϱй
Ͳϰ͘ϵйͲϭ͘ϮйͲϭ͘ϳйϬ͘ϭйͲϬ͘ϮйͲϮ͘ϮйͲϮ͘ϱйͲϬ͘ϬйͲϬ͘ϯйͲϮ͘ϱйͲϮ͘ϴйϮ͘ϴйϮ͘ϰйͲϮ͘ϴйͲϯ͘ϬйͲϮ͘ϴйͲϯ͘ϰйϵϬϮ͘Ϯϰ
ϵϬϮ͘ϮϬ
ϵϬϭ͘ϵϬͲϮ͘ϬйͲϭ͘Ϭй ͲϮ͘ϬйϵϬϰ͘ϱϬ
ϵϬϰ͘ϱϱ
ϵϭϭ͘ϰϮ
ϵϭϭ͘ϴϬ
ϴϵϱϵϬϬϵϬϱ
ϴ
ϵ
ϰ
ϴ
ϵ
ϲ
ϴ
ϵ
ϳ
ϴ
ϵ
ϴϴϵϵϵϬϭ
ϵϬϮ
ϵϬϯ
ϵϬϰ
ϵϬϲ
ϵϬϳ
ϵϬϴ
ϵϬϮ ϵϭϬϵϭϭϵϬϮ ϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϯϴϵϱϴϵϱϵϬϬϴϵϲϴϵϳϴϵϴϴϵϵϵϬϬ
ϵϬϱ
ϴϵϴ
ϴϵϵ
ϵϬϭ
ϵϬϮ
ϵϬϯ
ϵϬϰ
ϵϬϲ
ϵϬϬ
ϴϵϲ
ϴϵ
ϳ
ϴϵ
ϴ
ϴϵϵ
ϵϬϭ
ϵϬϮ
ϵϬϯ
ϵϬ
ϰ
ϴϵϴϴϵϳϴϵϳ ϴϵϲϴϵϱϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϴϵϴ͘ϵϳϴϵϵϴϵϵϵϬϬϵϬϰ͘ϭϳϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϰ͘ϱϬϴϵϲ͘ϬϬϴϵϯ͘ϵϱϵϬϮ͘ϰϰ ϵϬϮ͘ϰϰ
ϴϵϴ͘ϵϴ ϴϵϴ͘ϵϴ
ϴϵϳ͘ϰϴ ϴϵϳ͘ϰϴ
ϴϵϱ͘ϭϰ ϴϵϱ͘ϭϰ
dtϵϬϯ͘ϬϬ
tϵϬϮ͘ϬϮ
dtϵϬϯ͘ϳϬ
tϵϬϬ͘Ϯϵ
dtϵϬϰ͘ϬϬ
tϵϬϬ͘ϱϬ
dtϴϵϰ͘ϬϬ
tϴϵϯ͘Ϭϴ
dtϴϵϱ͘ϬϬ
tϴϵϯ͘Ϭϱ
dtϴϵϲ͘ϬϬ
tϴϵϯ͘Ϭϵ
dtϴϵϳ͘ϬϬ
tϴϵϯ͘ϯϭ
dtϴϵϴ͘ϬϬ
tϴϵϰ͘Ϭϱ
dtϴϵϵ͘ϬϬ
tϴϵϯ͘ϳϬ
dtϴϵϵ͘ϰϯ
tϴϵϵ͘ϰϯ
tϵϬϮ͘ϬϬ
dtϵϬϮ͘ϴϰ
tϵϬϮ͘ϬϬ
dtϵϭϮ͘ϵϲ
tϵϬϮ͘ϱϮtϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ
dtϵϭϬ͘ϳϬdtϵϭϬ͘ϳϬ
dtϵϭϯ͘Ϭϰ
tϵϭϮ͘ϲϳ
dtϵϭϰ͘ϲϮ
tϵϭϭ͘ϰϰ ϵϭϮϵϭϭϵϬϯ͘ϵϬ
ϯ͘ϱйϰ͘ϰй
ϯ͘ϱй
ϯ͘ϱй
Ϯ
͘
ϴйϱ͘ϯйϴ͘ϱйϴ͘ϱйϳ͘ϭйϰ͘Ϭй898.4896.7903.5^
^
^
^
^
^Ͳϭ͘ϬйϬϬйϵϬϬϬϬ
ϵϬϱϬϱ
ϴϵϴ
ϴϵϵ
ϵϬϭϭϵϬϭ
ϵϬϮ
ϵϬϯ
ϵϬϰ
ϵϬϲ
ϴϵϴϴϵϴϴϵϴϴϵϴϴϵϳϴϵϳϴϵϳϴϵϳ896.7896.7894
^
^
^
^
^^
^ϬϯййϵϬϬ
ϴϵϲ
ϴϵ
ϳ
ϴϵ
ϴ
ϴϵϵϵϵ
ϵϬϭϬ
ϵϬϮ
ϵϬϯ
ϵϬ
ϰ
ϴϵϲϴϵϲϴϵϲϴϵϲϴϵϱϴϵϱϴϵϱϴϵϱϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϴϵϲ͘ϬϬϴϵϲ͘ϬϬϴϵϯ͘ϵϱϴϵϯ͘ϵLoDLLooDD
ͲϮ͘ϴйϮ͘ϴйϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰ͘ϭϳϵϬϰ͘ϱϬ90
0
98Ϭϴϵϴ͘ϵϳϴϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϴ 898.4898.49907ϵϬϱ͘ϴϬϵϬϱ͘ϴϬͲϮ͘ϱйͲϬ͘ϬйϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϴϵϬϴϵϬϴϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϵϬϬϬϳϬϵϬϬϳϬϳϵϬϳϬϳϬϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬ0502903904Ϯ͘ϰйͲϮ͘ϴйϵϬϰ͘ϱϬ
ϵϬϰ͘ϱϱϵϬϰ͘ϱ ϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϯ͘ϵϬ
903.5903 5
1
TYP
1
TYP
2
h^ Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/> ͗͗Ͱh^ Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK: d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EE dKE<>sͲ>hEE/E't E ͰtKZ</E'&/> ^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^, d^ͰϰϬϬͲ'Z͘t'W>Kd^> ͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd ͗ϮͬϭϵͬϮϬϮϱϴ͗ϰϬDTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc.
275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620
Saint Paul, MN 55101
p:651.221.0915
BENCHMARK(S) (BMs)
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS
PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR
REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME
OR UNDER MY DIRECT
SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A
DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL
ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF
THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.
DATE:
REG. NO.
CERTIFICATION
KATHRYN MELODY, P.E.
21770
NOT
F
O
R
CON
S
T
R
U
C
TI
O
N
NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL
GRADING PLAN
Know what's
R
ϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z & ZdK
KE^dZhd/KEEKd ^E
> ' EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ
dKd, ^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘
Ϯ͘ WZKWK^ KEdKhZ^E^WKd
> sd/KE^Z dK&/E/^,
^hZ& 'Z ͘
EKd ^
SBI
N
( IN FEET )
GRAPHIC SCALE
1 < zEKd ^
ϭ͘ 'Z^^^t> t/d,Khd^K/>
D ED Ed;^ d/>ϮͬϵϬϭͿ
Ϯ͘ >KtWK/Ed
1 JAN. 7, 2025
PUD - CITY COMMENTS
1
2 FEB. 19, 2025
PUD - CITY COMMENTS
2
(4) RUSSIAN SAGE 'LITTLE
SPIRE'
(6) ASTILBE 'DEUTSCHLAND'(8) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL'
BLACK ALUM EDGING
(3) JUNIPER 'MEDORA' 5'
HGT.
(14) SWITCH GRASS
(4) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE
'NIGHTGLOW'
(5) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER'
(3) ARBORVITAE
'TECHNY' 5' HGT.
(3) JUNIPER
'MEDORA' 5'
HGT.
(3) ARBORVITAE
'TECHNY' 5' HGT.
(2) HYDRANGEA
'LIMELIGHT'
(2) SERVICEBERRY
(6) HYDRANGEA
'ANNABELLE'
(9) DAYLILY
'CHICAGO APACHE'
(2) COFFEETREE
'ESPRESSO'
(3) RIVER BIRCH
(3) RED CEDAR
(1) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW'
(2) OAK 'CRIMSON
SPIRE'
(1) OHIO
BUCKEYE
(3) JUNIPER 'MEDORA'
34" TRAP ROCK
GRAVEL
(5) SPIREA 'TOR'
(16) YARROW 'MOONSHINE'
(8) LIATRIS 'KOBOLD'
30'-8"
(3) RED CEDAR
(5) SPIREA 'TOR'
(1) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW'
(16) YARROW 'MOONSHINE'
(6) LIATRIS 'KOBOLD'
(3) PAGODA
DOGWOOD
(3) SERVICEBERRY
'AUTUMN BRILL'
(4) HAWTHORN
(1) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW'
(3) REDBUD
(1) ASPEN
(9) DAYLILY
'CHICAGO APACHE'
(10) CATMINT
'WALKERS LOW'
(10) CATMINT
'WALKERS LOW'
(6) TAUNTON YEW
(2) HYDRANGEA
'BERRY WHITE'
(2) HYDRANGEA
'BERRY WHITE'
(3) TAUNTON YEW
(34) ALLIUM 'MILLENIUM'
(34) BERGANIA 'WINTER GLOW'
(6) HYDRANGEA
'ANNABELLE'
(2) SERVICEBERRY
(4) RUSSIAN SAGE 'LITTLE
SPIRE'
(14) SWITCH GRASS
(4) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE
'NIGHTGLOW'
(6) ASTILBE 'DEUTSCHLAND'
(2
(3) RED CEDAR
(12) DAYLILY
'SUNDAY GLOVES
(6) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL'
(4) IRIS 'RUFFLED VELVET'
(4) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE'
(6) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER'
(12) DAYLILY
'SUNDAY GLOVES
(6) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL'
(4) IRIS 'RUFFLED VELVET'
(4) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE'
(6) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER'
AA RRRR
(20) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL'
(9) JUNIPER 'MEDORA' 5' HGT.
(17) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER'
(6) ARBORVITAE 'TECHNY' 5' HGT.
(2) HYDRANGEA 'LIMELIGHT' #25 CONT
(16) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE'
(18) DAYLILY 'CHICAGO APACHE'
(2) COFFEETREE 'ESPRESSO'
(3) RIVER BIRCH
(9) RED CEDAR
(2) OAK 'CRIMSON SPIRE'
(1) OHIO BUCKEYE
(10) SPIREA 'TOR'
(14) LIATRIS 'KOBOLD'
(2) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW' 2.5" CAL.
(32) YARROW 'MOONSHINE'
(3) PAGODA DOGWOOD 2.5" CAL.
(7) SERVICEBERRY 'AUTUMN BRILL' 2.5" CAL.
(4) RUSSIAN HAWTHORN, 2.5" CAL.
(3) REDBUD 2.5" CAL.
(1) ASPEN
(20) CATMINT 'WALKERS LOW'
(4) HYDRANGEA 'BERRY WHITE' #25 CONT
(34) BERGANIA 'WINTER GLOW'
(8) RUSSIAN SAGE 'LITTLE SPIRE'
(28) SWITCH GRASS
(8) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 'NIGHTGLOW'
(12) ASTILBE 'DEUTSCHLAND'
(24) DAYLILY 'SUNDAY GLOVES
(8) IRIS 'RUFFLED VELVET'
CANOPY LARGE TREES, 2.5" CALIPER
PERENNIALS, #1 CONT.
SHRUBS, #5 CONT.
EVERGREEN TREES, 2.5" CALIPER/ 6' HGT
(9) TAUNTON YEW
ORNAMENTAL TREES, 2.5" CALIPER & #25 CONTS
1234
BLUESTONE
ENTRY/ ADDRESS
MARKER
POURED
CONC. FTG 3'1'-6"
CHURCH PARKING LOT CURB
915.5
TW 913.0
BW 904.0
PROPERTY LINE
9'3'
6'-6"
CHURCH PARKING LOT CURB
915.5
TW 913.0
BW 904.0
PROPERTY LINE
3'
5'-9"
2'-3"4'-6"5'OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN
SCALE= 1" = 12'-0"1
LANDSCAPE
PLANTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc.
275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620
Saint Paul, MN 55101
p:651.221.0915
PLANT SCHEDULE2
PUD SUMBITTAL
NOV, 18 2024ENTRY/ ADDRESS MARKER3
WEST SIDE- SINGLE RETAINING WALL SECTION4
SCALE= 1" = 12'-0"
SCALE= 1" = 4'-0"
WEST SIDE- DOUBLE RETAINING WALL SECTION5SCALE= 1" = 4'-0"VERTICAL WALL
R-1 12/23/2024
PUD, CITY COMMENTS
36" HGT, BLACK ALUM FENCE & GATE
3. 15" SPRUCE, DEAD
5. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
18. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
4. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
7. SIGNIFICANT: 50" COTTONWOOD, FAIR
17. 36" BOXELDER, POOR
16. SIGNIFICANT: 60" SILVER MAPLE, FAIR
15. 60" SIBERIAN ELM, POOR
9. 12" SPRUCE,
POOR, DEAD
8. 12" SPRUCE, POOR, DEAD
1. 50" BUR OAK, POOR, DEAD
2. SIGNIFICANT: 20" HACKBERRY, FAIR
6. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
14. SIGNIFICANT: 8" HACKBERRY, FAIR
13. SIGNIFICANT: 12" HACKBERRY, FAIR
12. SIGNIFICANT: 6" HACKBERRY, FAIR
11. SIGNIFICANT: 6" AM. ELM, FAIR
10. SIGNIFICANT: 8" AM. ELM, FAIR
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS. TREE TO BE PRUNED
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS. TREE TO BE PRUNED
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS. TREE TO BE PRUNED
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS TREE. TO BE PRUNED
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS/ DEAD
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS/ DEAD
OUTSIDE PROPERTY
LIMITS/ DEAD
19. SIGNIFICANT: 6" CRABAPPLE, FAIR
RRRRY, FAIRR
ERRY IRRRERRY, FAIRERRYFAIR
M,FAIRIRRIRIIRRMFARRRRRIRIIRIRI
FAFAAIRRRRAIRAIRRRRR
BERRBERR RRY FAIRRY FAIR
AIRIRIRIRRRIIR
,LE, FAIRLE, FAIR
OU
AIRAIR
OD, FAIRRRROD,FAIROD,FAIR
FAIRRRRFAIRRRRFAIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR
D
EXTEND FENCING AFTER
DRIVEWAY IS REMOVED
EXTEND FENCING AFTER
DRIVEWAY IS REMOVED
EXTEND FENCING AFTER
DRIVEWAY IS REMOVED
ROOTS CUT/ DAMAGED
MUST BE PAINTED/ SEALED
AND BURIED AFTER CUTTING
TREE PROTECTION FENCING
PER DETAIL
TREE TO BE REMOVED
"SIGNIFICANT" TREE, TYP.
"PUBLIC" TREE, TYP.
"PRIVATE" TREE ON
NEIGHBORING PROPERTY
TO BE PRUNED, TYP.
PLAN VIEW
NOTES:
1) ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION
CONTROL FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO
THE PLANS PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION. AFTER
DEMOLITION OR AS NECESSARY, TREE PROTECTION
FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING
AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED
FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD
2) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE ANY MATERIALS OR
PARK ANY VEHICLES IN TREE PROTECTION ZONES. THE
FENCE SHALL PREVENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND THE
PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT,
STOCKPILES AND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION
WITHIN THE LIMITS OF PROTECTION.
3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEANLY CUT ALL ROOTS
EXPOSED BY GRADING AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE
ARCHITECT.
4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DESIGNATED
CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS
TREE PROTECTION FENCING:
48" ORANGE CONSTRUCTION
FENCING .
FASTEN TO POSTS WITH
GALVANIZED WIRE TIES
POSTS: 7' U-CHANNEL
1.12 LBS/FOOT STRENGTH
PAINTED OR GALVANIZED
FENCE: MEET OR EXCEED
Mn/DOT 2572.2B (2000)
DRIPLINE VARIES.
SET FENCE
MIN 12" OUTSIDE
DRIPLINE.
DRIPLINE VARIES
5' MAX
5' MAX.
POST S
P
A
CI
N
G
12"FROM DRIP
L
I
N
E
3. 15" SPRUCE, DEAD
5. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
18. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
4. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
7. SIGNIFICANT: 50" COTTONWOOD, FAIR
17. 36" BOXELDER, FAIR
16. SIGNIFICANT: 60" SILVER MAPLE, FAIR
15. 60" SIBERIAN ELM, POOR
9. 12" SPRUCE, POOR, DEAD
8. 12" SPRUCE, POOR, DEAD
1. 50" BUR OAK, POOR, DEAD
2. SIGNIFICANT: 20" HACKBERRY, FAIR
6. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR
14. SIGNIFICANT: 8" HACKBERRY, FAIR
13. SIGNIFICANT: 12" HACKBERRY, FAIR
12. SIGNIFICANT: 6" HACKBERRY, FAIR
11. SIGNIFICANT: 6" AM. ELM, FAIR
10. SIGNIFICANT: 8" AM. ELM, FAIR
TREE LIST:
19. SIGNIFICANT: 6" CRABAPPLE, FAIR
TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES REMOVED= 236"
((A/B)-0.20) x 1.5 x A = C
A = Total diameter inches of significant trees removed
B = Total diameter inches of significant trees on property
C = Replacement number of caliper inches
((236/236)-0.20) x 1.5 x 236 = 283" caliper required.
TREE REPLACEMENT CALCS:
TREE INVENTORY PLAN
SCALE= 1" = 12'-0"1
TREE PROTECTION DETAIL
SCALE= 1" = 12'-0"2SIGNIFICANT TREE LIST & CALCS
SCALE= NTS3
TREE
INVENTORY
PLANTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc.
275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620
Saint Paul, MN 55101
p:651.221.0915
PUD SUMBITTAL
NOV, 18 2024
R-1 12/23/2024
PUD, CITY COMMENTS
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Consent agenda item: 5c
Executive summary
Title: Approve Beltline Station plat extension - Ward 1
Recommended action: Motion to approve an extension until Dec. 31, 2025 for Sherman
Associates and the Economic Development Authority to record the final plat for the Beltline
Station Development.
Policy consideration: Should the city allow Sherman Associates and the Economic Development
Authority (EDA) to extend the period to record the final plat for the Beltline Staton
Development?
Summary: Per city code, Sherman Associates and the EDA are required to record the final plat
within two years after city council approval or request that the city council approve an
extension. The Beltline Station Development plat was initially approved on April 4, 2022. In
March 2024, the city council approved a one-year extension of the deadline, extending it from
April 4, 2024 to April 4, 2025. Since then, the developer has been working with city staff to
move forward on the project, but will be unable to meet the April 4, 2025 deadline to file the
final plat. In light of this, Sherman has submitted a written request to the city for an extension
of the plat.
The developer and the EDA remain committed to the project and continue to work
cooperatively to bring the Beltline Station Development to realization. The plat needs to be
recorded in a specific order at financial closing, which has not yet been scheduled. Staff
recommend approval of an extension to file the plat by Dec. 31, 2025. The plat extension
request does not affect or obligate the EDA or city council to approve any amendments to the
various contracts related to the Beltline Station Development.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Sherman Associates extension request
Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
233 Park Avenue South, Suite 201, Minneapolis, MN 55415 P 612.332.3000 F 612.332.8119 Sherman-Associates.com
March 5, 2025
Laura Chamberlain
City of St. Louis Park
Senior Planner
Laura,
Sherman Associates requests an extension to the Beltline Plat. The Beltline Plat was originally approved
April 4, 2022. We request extension of the Beltline Plat to December 31, 2025. The below outlines
reasoning for the extension request.
-We cannot record the plat prior to other documents planned to be recorded at the Beltline
Land/Financing closing.
-Beltline Land/Financing closing has been delayed due to;
o Required redesign and public bidding on the Met Council/Sherman parking ramp. The
updated ramp public bid was received on March 4, 2025.
o Economic conditions in debt and equity markets
We anticipate the Beltline Land/Financing closing and recording of the Plat will occur before the end of
the proposed extension period.
We appreciate your consideration.
Sincerely,
Will Anderson
Sherman Associates
Director of Development
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Consent agenda item: 5d
Executive summary
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and
lower-potency hemp retail registration and appendix A fees
Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading of ordinance amending city code
chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp retail registration and related fees in
appendix A. Ordinance would be effective April 11, 2025 following publication on March 27,
2025.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to adopt a registration ordinance for state
licensed cannabis products?
Summary: On March 3, 2025, the city council considered the first reading of an ordinance
amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp retail registration
and related fees. The council approved moving to a second reading after clarifying hours for
retail cannabis sales from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday and 10 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Sunday. Hours are similar to retail alcohol sales in St. Louis Park with exception for Sunday.
State statute requires local governments, at a minimum, to allow hours for cannabis retail sales
on Sunday from 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. City ordinance will allow sales on Sunday for cannabis from
10 a.m. to 10 p.m. to be consistent with evening hours Monday through Saturday.
In 2023, the State of MN passed legislation to legalize the possession, use, manufacturing and
sale of certain cannabis products. The law establishes the Office of Cannabis Management
(OCM) to regulate the commercial production and sale of cannabis related products.
OCM requires retail registration by either the city or county as part of their licensing process for
all retail sales of cannabis and lower-potency hemp products. This ordinance will establish a city
registration program with regulatory authority to limit the number of retailers, regulate hours
of operation and provide local compliance checks. This action provides additional measures of
control for the health and safety of the community as legalized cannabis products enter the
market, per state law.
The current city-issued hemp edible license remains in effect until the state begins licensing. A
future ordinance to repeal the current hemp edible license will be considered at that time.
Financial or budget considerations: Annual revenue from registration fees will be limited due
to the maximum fees established by the state and number of establishments. The initial city
$500 proposed registration fee is the only amount that can be collected for the first two years
of business operation. An annual renewal fee proposed at $1,000 may then be charged for each
subsequent year. Expected city revenue for 2025/26 from registrations may total about $5,000,
assuming five retail cannabis and twenty lower-potency hemp businesses. Added revenue is
expected from future disbursements of state cannabis sales tax.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Ordinance, Summary for publication
Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, building and energy director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 2
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp
retail registration and appendix A fees
Ordinance No. ______-25
Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8, Article II relating to establishing a
cannabis and lower-potency hemp retail registration
and Appendix A – 2025 fee schedule
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
SECTION 1. The St. Louis Park City Code, Chapter 8, Article II, Division 3 is hereby amended
by adding:
Subdivision XVII. Retail Registration for Cannabis and Hemp Products
Sec. 8-479.
(a) Findings and Purpose. City of St. Louis Park makes the following legislative findings:
1) The purpose of this ordinance is to implement the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 342, which authorizes the City of St. Louis Park to protect the
public health, safety, welfare of St. Louis Park residents by regulating cannabis
businesses within the legal boundaries of St. Louis Park.
(b) Authority & Jurisdiction. The City of St. Louis Park has the authority to adopt this
ordinance and to apply the following state statutes:
1) Minn. Stat. §342.13(c), regarding the authority of a local unit of government to
adopt reasonable restrictions of the time, place, and manner of the operation of
a cannabis business provided that such restrictions do not prohibit the
establishment or operation of cannabis businesses.
2) Minn. Stat. §342.22, regarding the local registration and enforcement
requirements of state-licensed cannabis retail businesses and lower-potency
hemp edible retail businesses.
3) Minn. Stat. §152.0263, Subd. 5, regarding the use of cannabis in public places.
4) Minn. Stat. § 412.221, regarding the authority of the City to protect the public
health, safety, order, convenience, and general welfare.
(c) The ordinance shall be applicable to the legal boundaries of St. Louis Park.
Sec. 8-480. Severability.
If any section, clause, provision, or portion of this ordinance is adjudged unconstitutional or
invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this ordinance shall not be
affected thereby.
Sec. 8-481. Enforcement
(a) The city manager or designee is responsible for the administration and enforcement of
this ordinance. Any violation of the provisions of this ordinance or failure to comply with
any of its requirements constitutes a misdemeanor and is punishable as defined by law.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 3
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp
retail registration and appendix A fees
Violations of this ordinance can occur regardless of whether or not a permit is required
for a regulated activity listed in this ordinance.
(b) Nothing in this section shall restrict or limit the ability of the city take any other
enforcement action in accordance with law, including but not limited to seeking
injunctive relief in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Sec. 8-482. Definitions. Unless otherwise noted in this section, words and phrases contained in
Minn. Stat. 342.01 and the rules promulgated pursuant to any of these acts, shall have the
same meanings in this ordinance.
(a) Cannabis Cultivation: A cannabis business licensed to:
1) grow cannabis plants within the approved amount of space from seed or
immature plant to mature plant;
2) harvest cannabis flower from mature plant;
3) package and label: immature plants, seedlings, and cannabis flower for sale to
other cannabis businesses;
4) transport cannabis flower to a cannabis manufacturer located on the same
premises; and
5) perform other actions approved by the OCM.
(b) Cannabis Retail Businesses: A Cannabis Retailer location and the retail location(s) of a
mezzobusiness, microbusiness, medical combination businesses, excluding lower -
potency hemp edible retailers.
(c) Place of Public Accommodation: A business, accommodation, refreshment,
entertainment, recreation, or transportation facility of any kind, whether licensed or
not, whose goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages or accommodations are
extended, offered, sold, or otherwise made available to the public.
(d) Retail Registration: An approved registration issued by the City of St. Louis Park to a
state-licensed Cannabis Retail Business or a Lower-potency Hemp Edible Retail Business.
(e) State License: An approved license issued by the OCM to a cannabis retail business.
(f) Temporary Cannabis Event: A temporary event organized within the City by the holder
of a Cannabis Event Organizer license.
Sec. 8-483. Registration of Cannabis and Lower-Potency Hemp Edible Retail Business.
(a) No individual or entity may operate a state-licensed cannabis retail business or
lower-potency hemp edible retail business within St. Louis Park without first
registering with the City of St. Louis Park.
(b) Any state-licensed cannabis retail business that sells to a customer or patient
without valid retail registration shall incur a civil penalty of up to $2,000 for each
violation as authorized in Minn. Stat. §342.22 subd. 5.
Sec. 8-484. Compliance Checks Prior to Retail Registration
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 4
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp
retail registration and appendix A fees
(a) Prior to issuance of a cannabis retail business registration, the City of St. Louis Park shall
conduct a preliminary compliance check to ensure compliance with local ordinances and
state law and OCM rules regarding applicable operation requirements and lawful
products.
Sec. 8-485. Registration & Application Procedure
(a) Fees.
1) The registration fee for cannabis and lower -potency hemp edible retail
businesses is established in the Appendix A fee schedule and shall be charged to
applicants depending on the type of cannabis businesses.
2) The initial registration fee shall include the first two (2) years of business
registration. The registered business must still submit all necessary information
for registration renewal at the end of the first year, but shall not have to pay an
additional fee at that time.
3) The renewal retail registration fee shall be charged at the time of the second
renewal and each subsequent renewal thereafter.
(b) Application Submittal. The city shall issue a retail registration to a state -licensed
cannabis or lower-potency hemp edible retail business that adheres to the requirements
of Minn. Stat. §342.22.
1) An applicant for a retail registration or registration renewal shall fill out an
application form, as provided by the City. Said form shall include, but is not
limited to:
i. Full name of the property owner and applicant;
ii. Address, email address, and telephone number of the applicant;
iii. The address and parcel ID for the property which the retail registration is
sought;
iv. Certification that the applicant complies with the requirements of local
ordinances established pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 342.13.
2) The applicant shall include with the form:
i. the registration fee;
ii. a copy of a valid state license or written notice of OCM license
preapproval;
3) Once an application is considered complete, the City Manager or designee shall
process the application and notify the applicant of approval or denial.
4) The application fee is non-refundable.
(c) Application Approval
1) A state-licensed cannabis retail business application shall not be approved if the
cannabis retail business would exceed the maximum number of registered
cannabis retail businesses permitted by Section 8-489.
2) A state-licensed cannabis retail business application shall not be approved or
renewed if the applicant is unable to prove it meets the requirements of this
ordinance.
3) A state-licensed cannabis retail business application that meets the
requirements of this subdivision shall be approved.
(d) Annual Compliance Checks.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 5
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp
retail registration and appendix A fees
1) The city shall complete at minimum one compliance check per calendar year of
every registered business to assess if the business meets age verification
requirements, as required under state law and this subdivision.
2) Age verification compliance checks shall involve persons at least 17 years of age
but under the age of 21 who, with the prior written consent of a parent or
guardian if the person is under the age of 18, attempt to purchase adult -use
cannabis flower, adult-use cannabis products, lower -potency hemp edibles, or
hemp-derived consumer products under the direct supervision of a law
enforcement officer or an employee of the local unit of government.
3) Nothing in this Section shall limit the ability of the city to conduct further
announced or unannounced compliance checks relating to any requirement of a
business’ license, registration, or lawful operation.
(e) Location Change. A registered business shall be required to submit a new application for
registration if it seeks to move to a new location still within the legal boundaries of the
city. This will be treated as a renewal of its registration.
Sec. 8-486. Renewal of Registration.
(a) The city shall renew an annual registration of a registered business at the same time
OCM renews the registered businesses’ license.
(b) A registered business shall apply to renew registration on a form created by city.
(c) A cannabis retail registration issued under this ordinance shall not be transferred.
(d) The city may charge a renewal fee for the registration starting at the second
renewal, as established in city’s fee schedule.
(e) The application for renewal of a retail registration shall include the items required
under under Sec. 8-485(b).
Sec. 8-487. Suspension of Registration
(a) When Suspension is Warranted. The city may suspend a registered business’
registration if it violates Minn. Stat. Chapter 342 or the City Code, or poses an
immediate threat to the health or safety of the public. The city shall immediately
notify the registered business in writing the grounds for the suspension.
(b) Notification to OCM. The city shall immediately notify the OCM in writing the
grounds for the suspension. OCM will provide the city and business a response to
the complaint within seven calendar days and perform any necessary inspections
within 30 calendar days.
(c) Length of Suspension. A jurisdiction can wait for a determination from the OCM
before reinstating a registration.
1) The suspension of a business registration may be for up to 30 calendar days,
unless OCM suspends the license for a longer period. The business may not make
sales to customers if their registration is suspended.
2) The City may reinstate a registration if it determines that the violations have
been resolved.
3) The city shall reinstate a registration if OCM determines that the violation(s)
have been resolved.
Sec. 8-488. Civil Penalties. Subject to Minn. Stat. 342.22, subd. 5(e) the City may impose a civil
penalty, as specified in the City’s Fee Schedule, for registration violations, not to exceed $2,000.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 6
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp
retail registration and appendix A fees
Sec. 8-489. Limiting of Registrations
The city shall limit the number of active registrations issued to any cannabis retailer,
cannabis microbusiness, or cannabis mezzobusiness to not more than five (5) registrations in
total.
Sec. 8-490. Hours of Operation
Cannabis businesses are limited to retail sale of cannabis, cannabis flower, cannabis
products, lower-potency hemp edibles, or hemp-derived consumer products
between the hours of 8 am and 10 pm Monday through Saturday and between 10
a.m. and 10 p.m. Sunday.
Sec. 8-491. Temporary Cannabis Events
(a) Permit Required. A permit is required to be issued and approved by the city prior to
holding a Temporary Cannabis Event.
(b) Hours of Operation. A temporary cannabis event may be open to the public only
between the hours of 10 a.m. to 10 p.m.
(c) Registration & Application Procedure. A permit fee, as established in city’s fee
schedule, shall be charged to applicants for Temporary Cannabis Events.
(d) Application Submittal & Review. The city shall require an application for Temporary
Cannabis Events.
1) An applicant for a retail registration shall fill out an application form, as provided
by the city. Said form shall include, but is not limited to:
i. Location of the proposed event;
ii. Full name of the property owner and applicant;
iii. Address, email address, and telephone number of the applicant;
2) The applicant shall include with the form:
i. the permit fee;
ii. a copy of the OCM cannabis event license application, including all
information required pursuant to Minn. Stat. §342.39 subd. 2.
3) The application shall be submitted to the city manager or designee for review. If
the designee determines that a submitted application is incomplete, they shall
return the application to the applicant with the notice of deficiencies.
4) The permit fee shall be non-refundable.
5) On-site consumption shall be allowed at a Temporary Cannabis Event in a
designated restricted-access area limited to only individuals who are at least 21
years of age. The designated on-site consumption area must not be visible from
any public place. No consumption of alcohol or tobacco is allowed. On-site
consumption may not cause an odor that can be detected by a person with a
normal sense of smell from beyond the boundaries of the Temporary Cannabis
Event
6) A request for a Temporary Cannabis Event that meets the requirements of this
Section shall be approved.
7) A request for a Temporary Cannabis Event that does not meet the requirements
of this Section shall be denied. The city shall notify the applicant of the standards
not met and basis for denial.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 7
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp
retail registration and appendix A fees
SECTION 2. The St. Louis Park City Code, Chapter 8, Article II title is hereby amended by
adding the following underlined language:
Article II. Licenses and Registrations
SECTION 3. Fee Schedule.
The City of St. Louis Park City Code Appendix A – 2025 Fee Schedule, Building & Energy
Department Section, is hereby amended by adding the underlined language as follows:
Business Registrations
Initial Cannabis Microbusiness $0
Renewal Cannabis Microbusiness $1000
Initial Cannabis Mezzobusiness $500
Renewal Cannabis Mezzobusiness $1000
Initial Cannabis Retailer $500,
Renewal Cannabis Retailer $1000
Initial Medical combination $500
Renewal Medical combination $1000
Initial Lower-Potency hemp edible retail $125
Renewal Lower-Potency hemp edible retail $125
Temporary Cannabis event $ 250
SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
its passage and publication by law.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 3, 2025:
___________________________________ _________________________________
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
____________________________________ _____________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren M. Mattick, city attorney
First reading March 3, 2025
Second reading March 17, 2025
Date of publication March 27, 2025
Date ordinance takes effect April 11, 2025
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5d) Page 8
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapter 8 establishing cannabis and lower-potency hemp
retail registration and appendix A fees
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. xxxx-25
Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8, Article II relating to establishing a
cannabis and lower-potency hemp retail registration and Appendix A – 2025 fee
schedule
This ordinance amends St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8, Article II establishing a
cannabis and lower-potency hemp retail registration and amends Appendix A establishing
related fees.
The ordinance shall take effect April 11, 2025.
Adopted by the city council March 3, 2025
Nadia Mohamed /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: March 27, 2025
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Consent agenda item: 5e
Executive summary
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco
licensing and definitions of drug paraphernalia
Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading amending sections of chapters 8 and
18 of the city code relating to tobacco licensing and definitions of drug paraphernalia to align
with changes in state statute. Ordinance would be effective April 11, 2025 following publication
on March 27, 2025.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to adopt amendments to city code chapter 18,
section 18-94 related to definitions of drug paraphernalia and chapter 8, subdivision X. related
to tobacco licensing?
Summary: On March 3, 2025, the city council considered the first reading of an ordinance
amending sections of chapters 8 and 18 of the city code relating to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia. The council voted in favor of the draft amendments and
approved the first reading.
In 2023, the state of Minnesota legalized the use of cannabis products by adults aged 21 and
older. Possession and home growing of cannabis is now legal with certain limitations . Currently,
chapter 18 section 18-94 of the city code references marijuana as a controlled substance, which
no longer aligns with recent changes to state statutes defining drug paraphernalia. This
amendment removes language defining cannabis and cannabis related devices as drug
paraphernalia. The city attorney has advised amending city ordinance referencing drug
paraphernalia to no longer include items related to marijuana.
The introduction of legalized cannabis is likely to generate public demand for cannabis
paraphernalia. As these items are no longer by definition “drug paraphernalia”, the city is
expecting retail businesses to have an increased interest in offering them f or sale. The
amendments to tobacco licensing in chapter 8 would allow businesses with an active tobacco
license, lower-potency hemp retail registration or cannabis retail registration to sell cannabis
paraphernalia. Amending the ordinance would limit retail access to these products, similar to
tobacco, helping ensure the health and safety of the community.
Financial or budget considerations: No added revenue or expenditures are expected with these
code changes.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Ordinance
Summary for publication
Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, building and energy director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 2
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
Ordinance No. ______-25
Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8, Subdivision X. relating to
tobacco licensing and Chapter 18 Article IV. Section 18-94 relating to definitions
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
SECTION 1. The St. Louis Park City Code, Chapter 8, Article II, Division 3, Subdivision X, is
hereby amended with the following original text, new text, and deleted text:
Sec. 8-372. License required.
(a) No person shall sell or offer to sell any tobacco, tobacco-related device, cannabis
paraphernalia, electronic delivery device, nicotine, or lobelia delivery product without first
having obtained a license to do so from the city, except that properly registered cannabis retail
businesses or lower-potency hemp edibles retail businesses may sell cannabis paraphernalia
without needing an additional license under this Section. (Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17)
(b) No license shall be issued for the sale of tobacco, tobacco-related device, cannabis
paraphernalia, electronic delivery device, nicotine, or lobelia delivery product at any place
other than the applicant’s place of business. No license shall be issued for a moveable place of
business; nor shall any single license be issued at more than one place of busi ness.
(c) Complete applications shall be reviewed by the city for verification and investigation of
the facts set forth in the application, including a criminal background investigation of the
applicant. The city may order and conduct such additional investigation as deemed necessary.
(d) The city shall make the determination whether to approve or deny the license. Any
denial shall be communicated to the applicant in writing, specifying the reasons for denial. The
applicant may appeal the denial in accordance with the procedure specified in section 8-36.
* * *
Sec. 8-373. Denial of license.
The following will be grounds for denying the issuance or renewal of a license under this
subdivision, and if a license is mistakenly issued or renewed to a person, it shall be revoked
upon the discovery that the person was ineligible for the license under this section:
(1) The applicant is under the age of 18 years.
(2) The applicant has been convicted of any violation of a federal, state, or local law,
ordinance or other regulation relating to tobacco, tobacco-related devices, electronic
delivery devices, nicotine or lobelia delivery products, or drug paraphernalia.
(3) The applicant has had a license to sell tobacco, tobacco-related devices, cannabis
paraphernalia, electronic delivery devices, nicotine or lobelia delivery products
revoked.
(4) The applicant fails to provide any information required on the license application or
provides false or misleading information on such license application.
(5) The applicant is prohibited by federal, state, or other local law, ordinance, or other
regulation from holding a license under this subdivision.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 3
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-311C.), 11-6-2000; Ord. No. 2432-13, 3-29-2013, Ord. No. 2454-14,
§8, 9-26-14; Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17)
Sec. 8-374. Regulations Adopted.
(a) It shall be a violation of this subdivision for any person to sell or offer to sell any
tobacco, tobacco-related device, electronic delivery device, nicotine, or lobelia delivery
product:
(1) To any person under the age of 21 years. (Ord. No. 2521-17, 7-17-17)
(2) By means of any type of vending machine.
(3) By means of self-service merchandising whereby the customer does not need to
make a verbal or written request to an employee of the licensed premises in order to
receive the tobacco, tobacco-related device, electronic delivery device, nicotine, or
lobelia delivery product. All such products shall be stored behind a counter or other
area not freely accessible to customers. (Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17)
(4) Containing opium, morphine, jimson weed, bella donna, strychnos, cocaine,
marijuana, or other type of deleterious, hallucinogenic or toxic or controlled
substance, except nicotine, and not naturally found in tobacco, tobacco-related
devices or electronic delivery devices.
(5) By any other means or to any other person prohibited by federal, state, or other
local laws, ordinances or other regulations.
(6) That meets the definition of flavored product. (Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17)
(b) Tobacco s Sampling, demonstration, or use of tobacco, electronic delivery
devices, cannabis paraphernalia, nicotine or lobelia delivery products within an establishment
selling any tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco related devices, electronic delivery devices,
cannabis paraphernalia, nicotine or lobelia delivery product is prohibited.
(c) No person shall sell, offer to sell, or distribute liquid, whether or not such liquid
contains nicotine that is intended for human consumption and use in an electronic delivery
device that is not contained in child-resistant packaging as that term is defined in Code of
Federal Regulations, title 16, section 1700.15 (b)(1), as in effect on January 1, 2015. A licensee
that fails to comply with this subpart is subject to administrative penalty pursuant to Minn.
Stat. § 461.12, subd. 2.
(d) No person shall sell, offer to sell, or distribute an electronic delivery device that:
(1) Is a “new tobacco product” as defined in 21 U.S.C. § 387j(a)(1) as may be amended
from time to time,
(2) Requires FDA premarket review under 21 U.S.C § 387j, and
(3) Does not have a premarket review order under 21 U.S.C. § 387j(c)(1)(A)(i), as may be
amended from time to time.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-311D.), 11-6-2000; Ord. No. 2415-12, 8-10-2012; Ord. No. 2454-14,
§9, 9-26-14; Ord. No. 2521-17, 7-17-17; Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17; Ord. No. 2580-20, 1-6-20)
Sec. 8-375. Responsibility for sales.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 4
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
Actions of their employees in regard to the sale of tobacco, tobacco-related devices,
cannabis paraphernalia, electronic delivery devices, nicotine or lobelia delivery by an employee
shall be considered a sale by the licensed owner.
(Ord. No. 2181-00, § 4(16-311E.), 11-6-2000; Ord. No. 2454-14, §10, 9-26-14; Ord. No. 2527-17,
12-4-17)
Sec. 8-376. Compliance checks and inspections.
All premises licensed under this subdivision shall be open to inspection by the city during
regular business hours. From time to time the city may conduct compliance checks by engaging
minor persons over 15 years of age but under 21 years of age to enter t he licensed premises to
attempt to purchase tobacco, tobacco-related devices, cannabis paraphernalia, electronic
delivery devices, nicotine, or lobelia delivery products.
Sec. 8-377. Illegal acts.
Unless otherwise provided in this subdivision, the following acts shall be a violation of this
subdivision:
(1) Illegal procurement. It shall be a violation of this subdivision for any person to
purchase or attempt to purchase, or otherwise obtain, any tobacco, tobacco -related
device, cannabis paraphernalia, electronic delivery device, nicotine, or lobelia delivery
product on behalf of a person under the age of 21 years. It shall also be a violation of
this subdivision for any person to sell or otherwise provide such products to any
person under the age of 21 years. It shall be a violation of this subdivision f or any
person to coerce or attempt to coerce a person under the age of 21 years to illegally
purchase or otherwise obtain or use any tobacco, tobacco-related device, electronic
delivery device, cannabis paraphernalia, or nicotine or lobelia delivery product.
(2) Use of false identification. It shall be a violation of this subdivision for any person
under the age of 21 years to attempt to disguise their true age by the use of a false
form identification, whether the identification is that of another person or o ne in
which the age of the person has been modified or tampered with to represent an age
older than the actual age of the person.
Sec. 8-378. Violation; penalty.
(a) Generally. Any violation of this subdivision shall be grounds to revoke or suspend a
license under this subdivision.
(b) Criminal penalty. As set forth in M.S.A. Ch. 609, it shall be a:
(1) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell tobacco, a tobacco-related device, cannabis
paraphernalia, electronic delivery device, nicotine, or lobelia delivery product to a
person under the age of 21 years for the first violation. Whoever violates this
subdivision a subsequent time within five years of a previous conviction under this
subdivision is guilty of a gross misdemeanor. (Ord. No. 2521-17, 7-17-17; Ord. No.
2527-17, 12-4-17)
(2) Misdemeanor to furnish tobacco, a tobacco-related device, cannabis paraphernalia,
an electronic delivery device, or nicotine, or lobelia delivery product to a person under
the age of 21 years. Whoever violates this paragraph a subsequent time is guilty of a
gross misdemeanor. (Ord. No. 2521-17, 7-17-17; Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17)
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 5
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
(3) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell or offer to sell a flavored product in violation of
section 8-374(a)(6). (Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17)
(4) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell, offer to sell or distribute liquid, whether or not such
liquid contains nicotine, that is intended for human consumption and use in an
electronic delivery device that is not contained in child-resistant packaging as that
term is defined in Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, section 1700.15 (b)(1), as in
effect on January 1, 2015. (Ord. No. 2527-17, 12-4-17)
(5) Petty misdemeanor for anyone under the age of 21 years to sell, furnish or give away
any tobacco, tobacco-related device, cannabis paraphernalia, electronic delivery
device, nicotine, or lobelia delivery product. This subsection shall not apply to a
person aged 18-20 years while working as an employee of a business holding a license
granted pursuant to this subdivision. (Ord. No. 2521 -17, 7-17-17; Ord. No. 2527-17,
12-4-17)
(6) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell an electronic delivery device in violation of section 8 -
374 (d). (Ordinance 2580-20, 1-6-20)
(c) Presumed penalties for Violations: The presumed penalties for violations are as follows
(unless specified, numbers below indicate consecutive business days’ suspension):
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 6
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
Type of Violation 1st
Violation
2nd
Violation
within
36 months
3rd
Violation
within
36 months
4th
Violation
within
36 months
1. Commission of a felony related to
the licensed activity.
Revocation
N/A
N/A
N/A
2. Sale of tobacco, tobacco-related
device, cannabis paraphernalia
electronic delivery device, nicotine,
or lobelia delivery product while
license is under suspension.
Revocation
N/A
N/A
N/A
3. Sale of tobacco, tobacco-related
device, cannabis paraphernalia
electronic delivery device, nicotine,
or lobelia delivery product to
underage person.
$500
$1,000
and 1 day
$2,000
and 30 days
Revocation
4. Refusal to allow government
inspectors or police admission
to inspect premises.
5 days
15 days
Revocation
N/A
5. Illegal gambling on premises.
3 days
6 days
18 days
Revocation
6. Failure to attend mandatory
education training.
$250
$750 and
1 day
$2,000 and
3 days
Revocation
7. Prohibited sale or offer for sale of
flavored products.
$500
$1,000 and
1 day
$2,000 and
30 days
Revocation
8. Prohibited sale or offer for sale of
liquid intended for human
consumption in an electronic
delivery device that is not contained
in child resistant packaging.
$500
$1,000 and
1 day
$2,000 and
30 days
Revocation
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 7
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
SECTION 2. The St. Louis Park City Code, Chapter 18, Article IV, Sections 18 -94, 18-95, and
18-96 are hereby amended with the following existing text, added text, and deleted text:
Sec. 18-94. Definitions.
(a) Drug paraphernalia. Except as otherwise provided in subsection (b) of this definition, "drug
paraphernalia" means all equipment, products, and materials of any kind, which are used,
intended for use, or designed for use in planting, propagating, cultivating, growing, harvesting,
manufacturing, compounding, enhancing, converting, producing, processing, preparing, testing,
analyzing, packaging, repackaging, storing, containing, concealing, injecting, ingesting, inhaling,
or otherwise introducing into the human body a controlled substance in violati on of M.S.A.
Chapter 152. The term “paraphernalia” includes, without limitation:
(1) Kits used, intended for use, or designed for use in planting, propagating, cultivating,
growing, or harvesting of any species of plant which is a controlled substance or from
which a controlled substance can be derived except for materials used for the personal
cultivation of cannabis as permitted under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 342 .
(2) Kits used, intended for use, or designed for use in manufacturing, compounding,
converting, producing, processing, or preparing controlled substances.
(3) Isomerization devices used, intended for use, or designed for use in increasing the
potency of any species of plant, which is a controlled substance.
(4) Testing equipment used, intended for use, or designed for use in identifying or in
analyzing the strength, effectiveness, or purity of controlled substances.
(5) (4) Scales and balances used, intended for use, or designed for use in weighing or
measuring controlled substances.
(6) (5) Diluents and adulterants, including quinine hydrochloride, mannitol, dextrose,
and lactose, used, intended for use, or designed for use in cutting controlled substances.
(7) Separation gins and sifters used, intended for use, or designed for use in removing
twigs and seeds from, or in otherwise cleaning or refining, marijuana.
(8) (6) Blenders, bowls, containers, spoons, grinders, and mixing devices used, intended
for use, or designed for use in compounding, manufacturing, producing, processing, or
preparing controlled substances.
(9) (7) Capsules, balloons, envelopes, and other containers used, intended for use, or
designed for use in packaging small quantities of controlled substances.
(10) (8) Containers and other objects used, intended for use, or designed for use in
storing or concealing controlled substances or products or materials used or intended
for use in manufacturing, producing, processing, or preparing controlled substances.
(11) (9) Objects used, intended for use, or designed for use in ingesting, inhaling, or
otherwise introducing controlled substances to include, but not limited to, marijuana,
cocaine, hashish, or hashish oil into the human body, including:
a) Metal, wooden, acrylic, glass, stone, plastic, or ceramic pipes with or without screens,
permanent screens, hashish heads, or punctured metal bowls.
b) Water pipes.
c) Carburetion tubes and devices.
d) Smoking and carburetion masks.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 8
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
e) Objects, sometimes commonly referred to as roach clips, used to hold burning
material, for example, a marijuana cigarette, that has become too small or too short to
be held in the hand.
f) e) Miniature cocaine spoons and cocaine vials.
g) f) Chamber pipes.
h) g) Carburetor pipes.
i) h) Electric pipes.
j) i) Air driven pipes.
k) j) Chillums.
l) k) Bongs.
m) l) Ice pipes or chillers
(b) Exceptions. Drug paraphernalia shall not include:
(1) Those items used in conjunction with permitted uses of controlled substances under
the Uniform Controlled Substances Act;
(2) Those items used by law enforcement officials as it relates to the seizure or
forfeiture of drug paraphernalia in connection with a crime or offense;
(3) Those items used by federal, state or local law enforcement officials for educational
purposes;
(4) The possession, manufacture, delivery or sale of hypodermic needles or syringes in
accordance with M.S.A. § 151.40 or as it may be amended; Syringes or needles or any
instrument or implement which can be adapted for subcutaneous injections;
(5) Those items defined as cannabis paraphernalia or medical cannabis paraphernalia as
defined in Minn. Stat. §342.01, as amended;
(6) Materials and equipment used by a cannabis business holding an active license
under Minn. Stat. Chapter 342.
(7) Products that detect the presence of fentanyl or a fentanyl analog in a controlled
substance.
(c) Other terms. Other terms are defined as specified in M.S.A. § 152.01 and any amendment
thereto.
Sec. 18-95. Drug paraphernalia evidence. In determining whether an object is drug
paraphernalia, a court or other authority shall consider, in addition to all other logically relevant
factors:
(a) Statements by an owner or by anyone in control of the object concerning its use.
(b) Prior convictions, if any, of an owner, or of anyone in control of the object, under any state
or federal law relating to any controlled substance.
(c) The proximity of the object, in time and space, to a direct violation of this section.
(d) The proximity of the object to controlled substances.
(e) The existence of any residue of controlled substances on the object , though an object may
not be found to be drug paraphernalia on the sole basis of a residual amount of one or more
controlled substances.
(f) Direct or circumstantial evidence of the intent of an owner, or of any person in control of the
object, to deliver the object to another person whom the owner or person in control of the
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 9
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
object knows, or should reasonably know, intends to use the object to facilitate a violation of
this section. The innocence of an owner, or of any person in control of the object, as to a direct
violation of this section may not prevent a finding that the object is intended or designed for
use as drug paraphernalia.
(g) Instructions, oral or written, provided with the object concerning the object’s use.
(h) Descriptive materials accompanying the object, which explain or depict the object's use.
(i) National and local advertising concerning the object’s use.
(j) The manner in which the object is displayed for sale.
(k) Whether the owner, or anyone in control of the object, is a legitimate supplier of like or
related items to the community, for example, a licensed distributor or dealer of tobacco
products.
(l) Direct or circumstantial evidence of the ratio of sales of the object or objects to the total
sales of the business enterprise.
(m) The existence and scope of legitimate uses for the object in the community.
(n) Expert testimony concerning the object’s use.
(o) The actual or constructive possession by the owner or by a person in control of the object or
the presence in a vehicle or structure where the object is located of written instructions,
directions, or recipes to be used, or intended or designed to be used, in manufacturing,
producing, processing, preparing, testing, or analyzing a controlled substance.
Sec. 18-96. Prohibited acts.
(a) Use or possession prohibited. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to use
or to possess drug paraphernalia. Any violation of this subsection is a petty misdemeanor.
(b) Delivery or manufacturing prohibited. A person may not deliver, possess with intent to
deliver, or manufacture with intent to deliver, drug paraphernalia, if that person knows or
should reasonably know that the drug paraphernalia will be used to plant, pro pagate, cultivate,
grow, harvest, manufacture, compound, enhance, convert, produce, process, prepare, test,
analyze, pack, repack, store, contain, conceal, inject, ingest, inhale, or otherwise introduce into
the human body a controlled substance in violation of M.S.A. Chapter 152, as amended, or any
other State or Federal law, rule, or regulation governing the manufacture, delivery, sale,
advertisement, possession, and/or use of controlled substances. Any violation of this
subsection is a misdemeanor.
(c) Delivery or sale to minors prohibited. Any person 18 years of age or over who violates Sec.
18-21096(b) by selling or delivering drug paraphernalia and said sale or delivery is to a person
who is under 18 year of age and at least 3 years his or her junior shall also be violating this
paragraph as well as Sec. 18-21096 (b). Any violation of this subsection is a misdemeanor.
(d) Advertisement prohibited. It is unlawful for any person to place in any newspaper,
magazine, handbill or other publication any advertisement knowing, or under circumstances
where one reasonably should know, that the purpose of the advertisement, in who le or in part,
is to promote the sale of objects designed or intended for use as drug paraphernalia. Any
violation of this subsection is a misdemeanor.
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 10
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND TERM. This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon
its passage and publication by law.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 17, 2025:
___________________________________ _________________________________
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
____________________________________ _____________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren M. Mattick, city attorney
First reading March 3, 2025
Second reading March 17, 2025
Date of publication March 27, 2025
Date ordinance takes effect April 11, 2025
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5e) Page 11
Title: Second reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 8 and 18 related to tobacco licensing and
definitions of drug paraphernalia
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. xxxx-25
Amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8, Subdivision X. relating to
tobacco licensing and Chapter 18 Article IV. Section 18-94 relating to definitions
This ordinance amends St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8, Subdivision X. allowing the
sale of cannabis paraphernalia at licensed tobacco, lower-potency hemp and cannabis retailers
and Chapter 18 Article IV. Section 18-94 removing references to cannabis paraphernalia from
the definition of drug paraphernalia.
The ordinance shall take effect April 11, 2025.
Adopted by the city council March 17, 2025
Nadia Mohamed /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: March 27, 2025
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Consent agenda item: 5f
Executive Summary
Title: Approve Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 and continued work with the Multi-Community
Wellhead Protection Plan Pilot study group work for Part 2
Recommended action: Adopt resolution approving West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead
Protection Plan (Part 1) and agree to continue participation in the development and
implementation of the remainder of the plan (Part 2).
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to continue to participate in a multi community
Wellhead Protection Plan?
Summary: In 2019, the Metropolitan Council began discussions with the west metro water
supply work group on developing a pilot study for a multi community Wellhead Protection Plan.
Wellhead Protection Plans are required for every city to be updated and approved by the
Minnesota Department of Health every ten (10) years. St. Louis Park’s current Wellhead
Protection Plan expires in 2027, the Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan should be
completed in 2026.
On March 16, 2023, the Minnesota Department of Health formally invited the city to participate
in this project and the City of St. Louis Park accepted on March 22, 2023, in the West Metro
Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan Pilot Study. In total, eight cities joined the pilot
study: Bloomington, Chanhassen, Eden Prairie, Edina, Hopkins, Minnetonka, Richfield and St.
Louis Park.
Metropolitan Council received money from the Clean Water Fund to pay for the Wellhead
Protection Plan Part 1. The Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 was completed by Barr Engineering
and approved by the Minnesota Department of Health on January 23, 2025. The Wellhead
Protection Plan Part 2 will be completed in-house by the Minnesota Department of Health,
Minnesota Rural Water Association and Barr Engineering.
Financial or budget considerations: There are no financial costs for any of the cities that
participated in the West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan Pilot Study.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in
environmental stewardship.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Austin Holm, utilities superintendent
Reviewed by: Jay Hall, public works director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 5f) Page 2
Title: Approve Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 and continued work with the Multi-Community Wellhead
Protection Plan Pilot study group work for Part 2
Resolution No. 25 -__
Approve Wellhead Protection Plan Part 1 and continued work with
the Multi-Community Wellhead Protection Plan Pilot study group
work for of the Part 2
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park recognizes the importance of its groundwater supply
as a natural resource used for drinking water; and
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park also recognizes the importance of protecting
groundwater and drinking water on a sub-regional scale, especially in areas like the west Twin
Cities metropolitan area where many communities utilize the same water supply aquifer and
have drinking water supply management areas previously approved by the Minnesota
Department of Health that overlap one another.
Whereas, it is within the responsibility of the City of St. Louis Park, as a public water
supplier, to consider the health, safety, and welfare of its customers; and
Whereas, the city has been presented the locations of the wellhead protection areas
and drinking water supply management area, as well as the vulnerability assessments for the
city’s wells, neighboring cities’ wells, and the sub-regional water supply aquifer. This
information encompasses Part 1 of the West Metro Multi-Community Wellhead Protection
Plan.
Now therefore be it resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows:
1. The City of St. Louis Park does hereby agree to take action to protect their wells and the
area within their jurisdiction of the drinking water supply management area that has
been approved by the Minnesota Department of Health.
2. The City of St. Louis Park does hereby approve the wellhead protection area, drinking
water supply management area, and vulnerability assessments for the city’s wells and
water supply aquifer.
3. The City of St. Louis Park does hereby agree to continue the wellhead protection
planning process by completing and implementing a multi-community Part 2 plan with
the other communities that participated in the Part 1 plan.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council March 17, 2025:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Discussion item: 1
Executive summary
Title: Whistle quiet zone overview
Recommended action: None. The purpose of this presentation is to provide an explanation of
railroad whistle quiet zones and outline the steps necessary to implement these zones.
Policy consideration: Does the council support a railroad safety study for the Canadian Pacific
Kansas City railroad through St. Louis Park?
Summary: St. Louis Park has a long history with freight rail trains transporting goods through
the community. Three railroads traverse the city: Burlington Northern/Santa Fe (BNSF), Twin
Cities and Western (TC&W) and the Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC). The attached map
shows the location of each rail line.
Trains are required by the federal government to sound their locomotive horns at all at-grade
railroad crossings. The horns are sounded regardless of the time of day. Overnight sounding of
horns has resulted in concerns from the community. Federal regulations have a process for
communities to partner with the railroad to greatly reduce the frequency of train horns,
referred to as whistle quiet zones, while maintaining safety compliance.
The BNSF railroad does not have any at-grade crossings and, therefore, only sounds their horn
when a safety issue is present near the tracks. TC&W is collocated with the Green Line Light Rail
Extension, and recent light rail crossing improvements have created a whistle quiet ready
corridor that will be implemented once the light rail is operational. The remaining railroad for
consideration of a whistle quiet zone (WQZ) is the CPKC.
Staff have engaged SRF Consulting Group to provide the council with a presentation and
overview of the process necessary to create whistle quiet zones. The presentation includes
federal regulations governing quiet zones, necessary infrastructure, and the process for
coordination with railroads and regulatory agencies.
Financial or budget considerations: The cost to complete a safety study for the CPKC railroad is
estimated at $65,000. The study is necessary to identify the infrastructure improvements costs
needed to implement a WQZ. If the city council directs staff to go forward with this study, the
engineering department’s 2025 consultant budget would be used to fund it. Funds for
implementing a whistle quiet zone are not currently in our 10 year CIP.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion, CPKC railroad crossing map
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, assistant city engineer
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director; Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Special study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: Whistle quiet zone overview
Discussion
Background: The Canadian Pacific Kansas City (CPKC) Railway (sometimes called the “Dan Patch
line”) runs north to south through St. Louis Park as well as other metro communities. There are
15 at-grade crossings in St. Louis Park where trains are required to sound their horn.
In late summer 2024, CPKC trains began traveling overnight on this track. When this change
happened, the city heard concerns from residents about the overnight noise.
We understand this is a new and unwelcome disruption; at the same time, neither the city nor
the state has the authority to tell the railroad when or how they can operate. Railroads are
regulated at the federal level, including a safety regulation requiring crews to sound locomotive
horns at crossings.
In response to these concerns, staff contacted CPKC, which shared that CPKC trains are
traveling on a nighttime schedule to best meet customer and operational needs, and they do
not have plans to return to a daytime schedule.
We have shared with the community that the city is investigating the potential for establishing
whistle quiet zones, which are specific areas near railway tracks where trains are not required
to blow their whistles. SRF Consulting Group was brought on board to educate staff and council
about the process to study whistle quiet zones and provide high-level cost estimates. Should
the city determine that a study should be undertaken, the study will identify refined
implementation costs.
Should the city undertake a study, council and our community should be prepared for the
following:
1. The designation of whistle quiet zones is a lengthy process, likely to take at least two
years to study and longer to implement.
2. Not all crossings may be deemed feasible to convert to whistle quiet zones.
3. The process may result in the recommendation for some crossings to be closed. It is the
staff’s understanding that this would close all traffic, including foot and bike, at these
crossings.
4. The city’s Capital Improvement Plan would need to be amended to include this project;
likely, the cost of the project would be significant.
Financial and budget considerations: In order to definitively assess the situation, staff
recommend a consultant to move forward with the railroad safety study, estimated to cost
$65,000. The study is necessary to identify the costs of infrastructure improvements necessary
to implement a quiet zone. If the city council directs staff to go forward with this study, staff
would use existing engineering operational funds.
Next steps: A railroad safety study would be the first step to determine the preliminary costs,
feasibility, and timeline for implementing a whistle quiet zone along the CPKC railroad. The
costs for implementation of a whistle quiet zone are the responsibility of the city and not
currently included in our CIP. A railroad safety study is necessary to develop a timeline and cost
estimate for implementation.
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
¹º»¼
WAYZATA BLVD S
694939K
CEDAR LAKE RD
854230K
W 28TH ST
854231S
W 29TH ST
854232Y
BRUNSWICK PED CROSSING
690986E
DAKOTA AVE S
854234M
LIBRARY LN 854235U
LAKE ST 854236B
WALKER ST
854237H
BRUNSWICK PED CROSSING
690988T
ALABAMA AVE
854241X
EXCELSIOR BLVD
854242E
W 41ST ST
854243L W 42ND ST
854244T
BROOKSIDE AVE
854245A
YOSEMITE AVE S
854246G PRIVATE RD
854247N
BROOKSIDE TER
854248V
W 49TH ST
854249C
Hopkins MinneapolisEdina
Golden Valley
Saint Louis Park
UV158
UV25
UV25
UV17
UV17
UV5UV5
UV3
UV3
UV3
UV3
?A100
?A100
?A100
?A100
?A100
?A7
?A7
!"#394 !"#394
TC&WCPKCBNSFTexas Ave SFrance Ave SMorningside Rd
W 50th StCoolidgeAveOxford
St Drew Ave SQuent
in
Ave
SCedarShoreDrBasswood Rd
Walker St
Yosemite Ave SW 44th St
E x c e ls io rB lvdGolden Hills Dr
W 51st StPark Place BlvdW 26th St Natchez Ave SC e d a rLakeR dKipling Ave SLouisianaAveSWayzata Blvd
AnnawayDrGamble Dr
RecCenterDrWooddale AveBarry St W
Ottawa Ave SW 49th StFrance Ave SDakotaAveSBrowndale AveW 3 5 th S t
Cedar Lake Ave
Cambridge St Lake StW 39th St
W 42nd StMeadowbrook RdSkylineDrMirrorLakesDrMeadowRdW 41st St Kipling Ave SN
Tyrol Trl
Lynn Ave SDakota Ave SR
ollin
g
Gr
eenPkwyForestRd
W 28th St LilacD rS
Idaho Ave SUtica AveAlpinePassC e darwoo
d
RdMaple Hill RdEwingAveSNevada AveUticaAveSSunset Blvd
Vandervork AveW 25th 1/2 St
Lynn Av
e
Circle Dwns
Beard Ave SW 16th St
Homedale RdB
y
wo
o
d
We
s
t
W L a k e S tW
Q
u
e
b
e
c
AveGoodrich St
W 35th St
Boyce St Chowen Ave SEdinaBlvdW 39th St
E d e n A v e MoorlandAveVallach
er
A
v
eNatchez Ave SW 23r
d
St
W 27th St
Interlachen RdMo
n
t
e
r
e
y
D
r Monterey Ave SMaryland Ave SSunnyslopeRdW
C e d a rL a k e R d
Wooddale
Ave
SNevada Ave SJoppaAveSCasco AveE lio tV ie w R d
Hawthorne RdDrexel AveW 29th St
W 14th St
L a k e S tHampshireAve
P a rk C o m m o n s D r38th St W
S unsetRdg
CircleWestDrew Ave SToledo Ave SParkNico l l e t LoopXenwoodAveSW 33rd St
JoppaAveSV e rnon Ave
C o u n try ClubRd
Goodrich Av e
Sunnyslope Rd EW 42nd St
W 26th St
GlenhurstAveUtica Ave SEdgebr
o
o
k
Dr
W 25th StColorado Ave SAlabama AveHuntington Ave SC e d a rL a k e R dS
Chowen Ave SInglewood Ave SEwing Ave SQuebec Ave SToledo Ave SLi
b
r
a
r
y
L
n
W 37th StPennsylvania Ave SB r i d ge St Glenhurst AvePennsylvania Ave SGorham
AveOregon Ave SNevada Ave SMaryland Ave SQuentin Ave SSalem Ave SRaleigh Ave SBrooksideAveUtica Ave SW 32nd St
Wo
o
d
D
a
l
e
A
v
e
SBeltlineBlvdPark Gle
n
R
d
Drew Ave SXenwood Ave SBrunswick Ave SBruce AveHuntington Ave SWebster Ave SDrew Ave SVernon Ave SParkCenterBlvdMer
il
aneAveArden AveInglewood Ave SKentuckyAveAlabama AveEwing Ave SJerseyAve36th St WWo
o
d
d
a
l
e
A
v
e
S
Walker St
Chowen Ave SEdgewood Ave SColorado Ave SGrimes AveW 27th St
Kentucky Ave SSumter Ave SW 31st St
Interlachen Blvd Zarthan Ave SFloridaAveSGeorgiaAveSJerseyAveSIdaho Ave SHampshireAveSW 28th St
Beard Ave SRhodeIslandAveSCedarLakePkwySunnysid
e
R
dTexasAveSWAlabamaAveW 29th St
Minnetonka Blvd
City of Saint Louis Park
Saint Louis Park Quiet Zone Assessment
Crossings Overview Map Figure X
0 0.25 0.5
Miles [
Legend
¹º»¼Pedestrian Crossing
¹º»¼At-Grade Crossing
Railway Network
Subzone A
Subzone B
Subzone C
Subzone D
Subzone E
Subzone F
Railway Routes
North American Rail Network Lines
Special study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 1)
Title: Whistle quiet zone overview Page 3
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Discussion item: 2
Executive summary
Title: Municipal building planning process: educational session
Recommended action: None at this time.
Policy consideration: None at this time.
Background: In recent Capital Improvement Plans (CIP), funds have been set aside for master
planning processes on both the police station and city hall to ensure they address the needs of
staff and the community, now and in the future.
With those processes in mind, staff wants to provide the city council with an educational
overview of the building design and construction process prior to making any decisions. This
initiative aims to equip the city council with a deeper understanding of how facilities are
planned, designed and constructed, ensuring alignment between infrastructure investments
and community needs.
The stages of construction include project identification and scoping, master planning, a
feasibility study, creation of schematic design, design development, creating construction
documents and bidding and construction administration. These stages are described in more
detail in the discussion section.
Financial or budget considerations: The 2024 and 2025 CIPs included a master plan and
feasibility study for the police station.
Strategic priority consideration: All
Supporting documents: Discussion
Prepared by: Jason Eisold, facilities superintendent
Jason T. West, parks and recreation director
Reviewed by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Special study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Title: Municipal building planning process: educational session
Discussion
Background: As the city’s infrastructure ages, it is necessary to assess the current condition of
facilities to understand what is needed to meet staff and community needs and to assess the
buildings’ life expectancy.
There are seven stages in the process as follows:
1. Project identification and initial scoping.
a. Facilities manager identifies upcoming Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) projects,
current physical status of facilities and how well the facilities are operationally
working for departments and raises issues to city manager and deputy city manager.
b. Project scoping with city manager, deputy city manager and internal staff team.
2. Master planning. This step identifies needs, opportunities and compares design
components (e.g. square footage dedicated to a specific use) to comparables in other
communities.
a. Conduct a master planning assessment, usually via an RFP for an architect.
b. Identify timeline.
c. Identify potential funding sources.
d. Council involvement depends on a variety of factors, including purpose of building,
scope of project, and cost of master planning process.
e. If the building is regularly used by the public (e.g. Westwood Hills Nature Center)
this step includes an external engagement process.
3. Feasibility study. This step evaluates the practicality of a project to decide whether to move
forward with the project or not.
a. Utilizes an independent assessment.
b. Reviews pros and cons to options (e.g. complete rebuild, remodel, do nothing)
outlined in the master plan
c. Provides estimated costs, timelines, and other implementation considerations to aid
in decision-making.
d. Council involvement includes reviewing staff work and considering support of the
project for inclusion in the city’s CIP.
e. Public engagement again depends on factors like use of the building, impact on
neighbors, and scope of the project.
4. Schematic design. The schematic design phase considers important design issues such as
context, massing, transparency and identity.
a. One of the primary goals will be to design a building that captures the current and
projected needs a relevant way.
b. This phase typically ends with a cost estimate by cost estimators or a cost
consultant, resulting in a confirmed budget and schedule.
c. Schematic design typically includes:
i. Site plan
ii. Floor plans
iii. Exterior elevations
Special study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 3
Title: Municipal building planning process: educational session
d. Council involvement in this stage includes reviewing schematic design documents
and revised cost estimates.
e. This step involves public outreach efforts and staff involvement.
5. Design development. The design development phase continues refining the building
design and begins more detailed development of the schematic design to ensure that all
major design and systems decisions have been analyzed and are achievable.
a. This phase will also end with an updated cost estimate to confirm scope and budget
are in alignment.
b. Design development typically includes:
i. Site development
ii. Landscape plan
iii. Architectural development
iv. Floor and reflected ceiling plans
v. Building and wall sections
vi. Exterior elevations
vii. Primary interior elevations and material selection
viii. Engineering systems development
ix. Technical specifications
x. Value engineering (if necessary)
c. Note: All city facilities projects adhere to the same adopted city ordinance, policy or
design standards as private development projects.
d. Council involvement at this stage is to provide direction to staff to proceed with
construction documents.
e. Community education is typically provided at either or both the design
development and/or bidding of the project.
6. Construction documents
a. The design team will proceed with the documentation necessary to provide
construction documents (drawings and specifications) for the project.
b. Construction documents typically include:
i. Site documentation
ii. Architectural documentation
iii. Engineering systems documentation
iv. Project manual (general conditions and technical specifications)
v. Quality assurance review
c. Council involvement in this stage is to provide staff direction to go out to bid for the
project’s construction.
7. Bidding/construction administration. When the construction documents are
completed, the team will proceed with bidding and negotiation of the construction
contracts.
a. The documents will be submitted to authorities having jurisdiction for the
regulatory reviews necessary to obtain the building permit.
b. Construction activities are closely observed through site visits to help ensure the
project is delivered as conceived.
c. Council involvement at this step involves accepting the final bids.
Special study session meeting of March 17, 2025 (Item No. 2) Page 4
Title: Municipal building planning process: educational session
d. Community education is typically provided at either or both the design
development and/or bidding of the project.
Present considerations: At this time, staff has done some master planning for the police station
and will undertake a similar activity for city hall. Given their proximity, staff believes it is most
prudent to align these projects so we can bring a comprehensive approach to the city council
for future decision making during the feasibility portions of the process.
Next steps: Staff will begin the city hall master planning in 2025 and plan to bring an update on
both projects to council by the end of year.
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: March 17, 2025
Written report: 3
Executive summary
Title: Recreation Outdoor Center (ROC) acoustics report
Recommended action: None at this time. This report is to provide the results of a feasibility
study for the possibility of improving the acoustics at the ROC.
Policy consideration: Does the city council support staff’s recommendation not to move
forward with budgeting money in the CIP for acoustic improvements ?
Summary: On June 3, 2024, the city council directed staff to explore the possibility of improving
the acoustics at the ROC. Staff then contracted a consultant to conduct a feasibility study on the
impact of installing acoustic improving measures.
The acoustic study revealed the following key findings:
1. Minimal impact on noise reduction: the proposed acoustic upgrades would only reduce
the decibel level by 1 decibel (dB).
2. Structural limitations: the ROC roof beams were not designed to support the additional
weight of the proposed acoustic materials.
3. Maintenance concerns: the materials are likely to become collection points for birds
and debris, adding to ongoing maintenance challenges.
4. Alternative measures:
• Low and no cost adjustments to the current audio system to enhance sound quality
were provided by the consultants and have already been implemented by staff.
• Increase user education on optimizing the system for better audio presentations.
Based on these findings that there would be minimal benefits to investing in acoustic
improvements, staff do not recommend moving forward with the installation of acoustic
materials at the ROC. Staff will, however, initiate the alternative measures. Staff have started
and recommend continuing to adjust the current audio system with the recommendations
provided.
Financial or budget considerations: Following the acoustic engineering study, staff obtained
two quotes for the advised capital improvements. The quotes were $116,600 and $250,715. In
addition to these costs, there would be installation and hardware expenses. This funding is not
currently in the 10-year capital improvement plan and staff do not recommend adding it due to
the poor return on investment.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: None.
Prepared by: Jason T. West, parks and recreation director
Geoff Clarke, rec center manager
Reviewed by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager