Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/01/12 - ADMIN - Minutes - Environment & Sustainability Commission - Study Session Environment & sustainability commission meeting January 12, 2025 Annual retreat Official minutes Environment & sustainability commission Members present: Chair Eric Zweber, Vice Chair Abigail Oppegaard, Shaina Ashare, Tatiana Giraldo, Ryan Griffin, Jessica Hendrix, Ethan Kehrberg, Bennett Myhran, Natalie Wagner, Avery Kuehl Members absent: Marisa Bayer, Ramil Goonetilleke, Sasha Shahidi Staff present: Emily Ziring, sustainability manager; Annie Pottorff, sustainability specialist; Ellie Rabine, sustainability specialist Guests: None 1. Call to order – roll call a. The meeting was called to order at 9:32 a.m. 2. Unfinished business • Approval of minutes (Dec. 4, 2024) o Commissioner Wagner moved to approve minutes o Vice Chair Oppegaard seconded o Motion passes • Approval of letter to Planning Commission re: expanding neighborhood housing options o Commissioner Hendrix moved to send the letter to city council o Commissioner Kuehl seconded o Motion passes with one abstention (Commissioner Myhran) 3. Sustainability in St. Louis Park Emily reviewed the city’s climate action plan history and goals; staff, council, and commissioner roles; and current projects/programs. She also discussed plans for staff work on resiliency, particularly with respect to responding to extreme heat. 4. Introduction to the 2025 draft ESC work plan • Chairs reviewed the proposed work plan topics. No new/missing topics were proposed by commissioners. • Commissioners split up into small groups to review work plan initiatives. 5. Report out on 2025 work plan o Initiative 1 – Climate Action Plan update  Commissioner Ashare  Commissioner Kehrberg Environment & sustainability commission meeting  Suggest this topic become an established work group. ESC can help identify when an update happens. It should be an amendment, not a rewrite. Break things up into how we can lead, how can we influence, and what’s out of our hands. Are there any science-based targets we need to align with? Align with legislation that has passed since the CAP was written, add better definitions and deadlines, build out glossary and terms, consider Hennepin County waste efforts, partner with other nearby environmental commissions, consider community input. Thinking through federal and state funding availability. Think through if we should still have language around carbon offsets or reconsider this. o Initiative 2 – Electrification event  Commissioner Wagner  Commissioner Giraldo  Group considered goal for electrification event based on e-bikes and home electrification incentives. Goal is twofold: increase awareness of SLP programs/incentives and increase awareness in general around benefits of electrification. Engage residents, business owners, and people visiting St. Louis Park. Propose a bike event. Pedals, Pints, and Power / Cycle, Sip, and Sustainability! Involve 3 different breweries. The first would focus on SLP incentives. Invite hardware store such as Jerry’s (showcase electric snowblowers, etc.). Second would focus on electrification incentives in your home, invite someone (from Park Nicollet?) to talk about health benefits. Third would be all about e-bikes, would invite Erik’s. Opportunities for local businesses to partner. Host a raffle where the prize could be bike-related. City staff would also be present to talk about bike infrastructure and answer questions, especially about first mile/last mile journeys to/from the future LRT stations. Could potentially invite local HVAC or solar contractors/resources. There are two new microbreweries in St. Louis Park. Invite a current residential SLP champion who has electrified that can talk about their experience. Late summer/early fall timeline. o Initiative 3 – Promote curbside organics program to single-family households  Commissioner Hendrix  Chair Zweber  Considered common barriers to participation as well as how to communicate benefits such as free bags, residents are already paying for it, GHG emissions reduction, reducing need for landfills or incinerators. Discussed creating a poll to dig into reasons. Reach out to 2 - 4 unit properties. Help support some kind of compost awareness event. Support automatically giving people bins. Sponsoring a tour of a composting site. Connecting with local composting council to see how ESC could support efforts. Would like to set a goal of 60% participation by 2030, if that is deemed reasonable by staff and further research. Build on existing event workgroup to support outreach. Environment & sustainability commission meeting o Initiative 4 – Educate residents at elementary school open houses  Commissioner Kuehl  Vice Chair Oppegaard  This could also be combined with an events workgroup. Brainstormed some crafting ideas – seed bombs, painting tree cookies, and recycling/composting sorting games. Math nights, book fairs, Parktacular, art fair, should all be considered as well beyond elementary school events. o Initiative 5 – Promote value of trees  Commissioner Myhran  Commissioner Griffin  Keeping in mind that the average life expectancy for an urban tree is 7 years… think about how to keep trees alive longer, when they begin providing carbon benefits (~30 years). Think about canopy goal and how will we hit that? Consider how new tree ordinance is working, as well as other tree-related policy such as preferred contractors. Consider standards that are being set, and if future amendments/specificity is needed. Understanding city’s involvement in overhead lines as it relates to tree trimming. How could ESC support/push for undergrounding power? Understanding emissions due to wood waste – mulching has high carbon emissions. Better communicating how burying trees is a better carbon sink. Suggest creating a city definition of “wild space” vs. “green space,” e.g., WHNC vs. soccer field. Focus on preserving these wild spaces. Also discussed exploring biochar further. City of Wayzata has a contractor to create biochar from municipal wood waste (great as a soil amendment, neutralizes pH, and more benefits). Great River Greening has mobile kilns to produce biochar – who is an existing city partner. Could explore this partnership further. • Commissioner Giraldo asked about large tree removal and how to repurpose it to products. • Commissioner Myhran answered that the City of Minnetonka has a portable mill and they produce lumber. They have partnered with other communities that want to try it out. Could also partner with contractors who could mill the tree and offer it back to you. o Emily Ziring noted that a few of the work plan items will require support from staff in departments outside of Sustainability—specifically solid waste (within Public Works), planning (within Community Development), and natural resources (with Parks & Recreation)—and that progress on those work plan items will be dependent on their staff capacity. 6. Revising standing agenda • Chair Zweber discussed the proposed agenda item of introduction of guests. • As the city moves forward with their comprehensive plan and Vision 4.0, this will be grouped under the work plan update section, and the ESC will have opportunities for feedback. Environment & sustainability commission meeting • Chair Zweber suggested a standing agenda spot for commissioners to recommend a topic for further discussion, even if it is not strictly CAP-related. • Commissioner Hendrix asked why the environmental justice agenda item was removed, and the chairs explained this is now meant to be included under item 6 – sustainability issues. The spot can be used to discuss environmental justice issues or others that are important to the commission. • Commissioner Griffin suggested a spot/reminder for the ESC to connect and consider collaborations with other city commissions. Chair Zweber said this is a topic that could be brought up under his suggested agenda spot for recommendations for further discussion. • Emily Ziring added that she is discussing and planning cross-commission meetings with fellow staff including the liaisons to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission and Planning Commission. • Commissioner Kehrberg asked if there had ever been a land acknowledgement for the commission meetings. • Emily added that council has it in their work plan to consider this year for council meetings. • Commissioner Hendrix recommended waiting to see how council moves forward with crafting their possible acknowledgement. Others agreed. • Vice Chair Oppegaard moved to approve the standing agenda. • Commissioner Griffin seconded. • Motion passed with unanimous support. 7. Future meetings • Emily will confirm if the March meeting will be rescheduled because of Ash Wednesday. The April meeting will also likely be rescheduled because of spring break. • Chair Zweber brought up the future Planning Commission combined meeting. • Commissioner Griffin proposed discussing the wild space definition with the Planning Commission. Chair Zweber also recommended discussing commercial and multifamily development, which have large parking lots that could be considered for depave and other city initiatives. • Commissioner Ashare brought up that the October date will be during Yom Kippur. Emily noted this meeting will also be rescheduled. 8. By-laws • Chair Zweber highlighted section 4.b) and recommended that the elections are held at the September meeting instead of the first or second meeting of the year, to help give existing members time. • Emily suggested that the wording be changed instead to “at the discretion of the commission” for flexibility. • Emily will suggest to staff that 4.c) be updated to broadly say “all city-recognized holidays.” • Commissioner Ashare was wondering if the city holiday calendar aligned with the school district, such as for Eid Al Fitr. Environment & sustainability commission meeting • Chair Zweber suggested changing the official meeting time from 7:00 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. • Emily will work with staff to update these changes, then bring it the commission for approval, and then the changes will need to be approved by council. 9. Wrap up • Commissioner Myhran asked about next steps for the work plan and if all suggested items from the retreat would be included. • Chair Zweber said the draft work plan will be on the agenda for the next meeting. • Emily plans to incorporate commissioners’ notes into a draft work plan and email it ahead of the February meeting. Commissioners will then provide feedback and then formally adopt the plan at the February meeting. • Emily does not know when the work plan will officially go to council for approval. Everything related to the environmental stewardship strategic priority will be discussed at May-June city council study sessions. Emily clarified that the work plan will still be adopted by the council before then, and commissioners can begin working towards goals. • Commissioner Griffin liked the work plan topic sheet structure but wants another chance to wordsmith items. • Emily re-confirmed that she will send it in advance of the meeting and solicit feedback from commissioners who were unable to attend. She noted that the work plan implementation is dependent on this group of volunteer commissioners and that no one will be judged for progress on any items. • Commissioner Griffin added for next year that it would be nice to have more time to discuss the proposed work plan ideas as a group. Emily said there will be an opportunity at the February meeting to discuss items further. • Emily suggested formally re-establishing the events workgroup at the February meeting. • Commissioner Griffin asked if the commission could be informed of upcoming council discussions in May-June so that they could potentially advise on topics outside of the work plan. • Emily said she knows she will be updating council on the Better Climate Challenge and replenishing the climate investment fund. She added that the commission can also recommend topics, whether in the work plan or outside of the work plan, and those could be brought up during this time. • Commissioner Giraldo asked if the commission should look into a resilience workgroup. • Emily said that this should be revisited later in the year or for a future work plan. Annie and Ellie can also present to the commission on their resilience research and findings later in the year. 10. Adjournment The meeting was adjourned at 1:29 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Emily Ziring, liaison Eric Zweber, chair member