Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2025/02/05 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - Planning Commission - Regular Planning commission meeting February 5, 2025 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther at 952.924.2574 or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission meeting The St. Louis Park Planning Commission is meeting in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Members of the public can attend the planning commission meeting in person or watch the regular meeting by webstream at www.parktv.org and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14 and HD channel 798). Visit bit.ly/slppcagendas to view the agenda and reports. You can provide comment on agenda items in person at the meeting or by emailing your comments to info@stlouispark.org by noon the day of the meeting. Comments must be related to an item on the meeting agenda. Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION 1.Call to order – roll call 2.Approval of minutes – January 8, 2025 and January 15, 2025 3.Hearing 3.a. Application name: Minnetonka Boulevard twinhomes plat and planned unit development Location: 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd. Applicant: Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation Case No: 24-24-S, 24-25-PUD 4.Other Business 5.Communications 6.Adjournment Future scheduled meeting/event dates: February 19, 2025 – planning commission study session March 12, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting* March 19, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting April 2, 2025 – planning commission regular meeting *Meeting held on March 12 since Ash Wednesday is on March 5. 1 2 Planning commission January 8, 2025 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, Sylvie Hyman, Jan Youngquist, Tom Weber, John Flanagan, Estella Hughes (youth member) Members absent: none Staff present: Laura Chamberlain, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther Guests: Jeff Miller, consulting planner, HKGI 1.Call to order – roll call. Approval of minutes – Nov. 6, 2024, Dec. 4, 2024, Dec. 18, 2024 It was moved by Commissioner Hyman, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist, to approve the Nov. 6, Dec. 4, and Dec. 18, 2024 minutes as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 2.Hearings. 2a. Title: Comprehensive plan, zoning ordinance and zoning map amendment – residential districts Case No: 24-26-CP, 24-27-Z Ms. Chamberlain and Mr. Morrison presented the report. Commission Hyman asked about the alley requirements and if this is specified as car vs. sidewalk access. Mr. Morrison stated it is vehicle and driveway access that it refers to. Commissioner Youngquist asked about minimum lot sizes in the N1 district and the relationship to the comprehensive plan. She asked if the smallest lot size in N1 is 3,600 square feet. Mr. Morrison stated yes with alley access. She asked about the square footage and density, because that minimum lot size does not equate to 18 units per acre. Mr. Morrison stated this district includes lot sizes at 40-foot lots, which are a reduction from the 60 feet minimum today, and allows duplexes to be built on a 40-foot-wide lot. Mr. Miller added the density is also a reflection of allowing triplexes in low density residential areas. Chair Divecha asked about the net decrease in acres for some land use designations but also noted park acreage increases in the land use table and asked for more explanation of this. Ms. Chamberlain stated the comprehensive rezoning was an opportunity to clean up the designation of properties around the city including some park and open space parcels. 3 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 Chair Divecha asked about the net decrease in industrial as well. Ms. Chamberlain stated with the comprehensive rezoning, staff also applied new mapping standards to the zoning map and revealed some inconsistencies with where district boundaries were drawn and these changes also influenced these numbers. Chair Divecha asked about the front yard requirements of 25 feet and adjustments based on existing conditions. Mr. Morrison clarified the requirement is the greater of 25 feet or the closest existing front yard setback on that side of the block. Chair Divecha asked, related to the zoning map with residential districts, is this the appropriate time to talk about zoning to mixed-use. Mr. Walther stated this zoning code update to the city’s residential district standards has been worked on for almost 2 years now and is actually phase 1 of 3 phases, so after residential zoning is addressed, staff and planning commission will begin review of the other districts including commercial, industrial, office. He added the 3rd phase relates to parking, lighting, signs and other performance standards. He stated the mixed-use portion would fall into the 2nd phase of discussion. He added any parcel proposed to change is on the table for discussion today and more detail can be provided if the discussion leads to any of those parcels. Commissioner Beneke asked if something is designated as park open space, can it be changed to something else. Mr. Walther stated, yes, it could. However, there are added requirements to convert properties, for example, any comprehensive plan land use change requires a supermajority of five votes statewide. He added that after the city prepared to and ultimately sold some of its excess land in the mid-2000s, the city also created a new parks and open space zoning district, rezoned several park properties to park and open space, and adopted regulations requiring a supermajority of five votes to rezone park property, which is unique to St. Louis Park. He stated if a parcel is zoned park and open space there must be 5 council members in support to change this, which is meant to be an added layer of protection. Commissioner Hyman asked if all parcels designated park and open space are owned by St. Louis Park. Mr. Walther stated that was initially the case, but since initially establishing the district St. Louis Park has expanded it to include the Minnehaha Creek Reserve owned in part by Minnehaha Creek Watershed District and Meadowbrook Golf Course which is owned by Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board. He added a sliver of land in the northeast part of the city is also proposed to become park and open space with this zoning map change that is owned by City of Minneapolis. He added one notable exception is the Minneapolis Golf Club which is zoned single-family residential today and proposed to change to N1. He stated this is a privately owned parcel and the city has not approached them about changing the zoning. Chair Divecha opened the public hearing. David Rickheim, 4038 Quentin Ave., stated he has owned his home for 3 years and was a renter in St. Louis Park for 4 years. He stated generally he is in favor of the proposals and has followed this process for some time. He stated this is a balancing act of nuances, intentions, and wants 4 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 and he is looking forward to phase 2 and noted the missing middle is a big deal and is not as radical as some fear, but can allow residents to enjoy this more over time. Bob Kusnetz, 2530 Inglewood Ave. S., is the president of the Fern Hill Neighborhood Association. He stated the group has worked on grants to remove invasive species and create pollinator-friendly gardens. He stated on behalf of the Fern Hill Neighborhood Association he would like to request that the north parcel, which was Lilac Way or Highway 100, be changed to N1 or open park space, remain park space. He stated they believe that land is best as open park space and moving to N1 would contradict the policy of making it more of an open space. He encouraged the commission and city council to keep it open park space. Karen Laukkonen, 3401 Zarthan Ave., stated she is the founder and director of Restore Lilac Way which she founded in 2007. She stated her project documents the preservation and restoration that has happened on Lilac Way over the years. She stated there are only 3 of the 1930’s parks left, and St. Louis Park has 2 of them. She stated the community does support the rezoning of the north parcel and wants to keep it park and open space and not have it residential under N1 zoning. She stated this area is home to native pollinators, deer and turkey as well and the community wants both parcels to keep it at residential and park open space. Sasha Shahidi, resident of the Wolfe Park neighborhood and commissioner on the Environmental and Sustainability Commission, noted the ESC formally and unanimously recommended the France Avenue parcel be rezoned to park and open space to prevent the possibility of development there. She added personally she recommends the land east of Minnekahda Vista Park and the land north of Rock Island Park to park and open space and not N1 or N2. She stated this will protect that land in the long run as opposed to rezoning it as N1 or N2 which could then allow the land to be developed in the future. She added building low- density housing that sacrifices wild space will not make an end to the affordable housing crisis, adding she does not see enough bang for the buck by putting affordable housing at Minnekahda Vista Park. She stated it is more impactful to look at other spaces for affordable housing which can have a bigger impact, with higher density housing and mixed-use developments. She stated she is not against development and feels increasing affordable housing in St. Louis Park is very important and stated she is a champion of the overall zoning plan and thanked staff and the commission for their work on this. Ms. Shahidi stated high-density affordable housing is more sustainable but not at the expense of the last remaining wild spaces within the city and added not all park and open space is the same. She added wild spaces provide eco-friendly space that manicured parks and athletic facilities don’t provide. She asked that these open park spaces be protected. Daniel Turnquist, 3924 Excelsior Blvd, noted the city’s strategic priorities. He stated more opportunities for housing, environmental stewardship, increased density, broad range of housing in neighborhood development, variety of options for residents to move around the city safely, different modes of transportation, building community capital through community engagement are all very important parts of the city’s priorities and he stated he is excited to meet his neighbors. 5 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 Richard Lang, 2743 Toledo Ave. S., stated the Rock Island area is an important area and needs to remain park land. He stated this area is next to a highway with a wall, and this is the one green space in the area. He stated he talked to all the neighbors about this, and it is a big park of Fern Hill and an important niche. He stated green space should be in every parcel and cannot imaging the city taking away green space. He stated he supports multi-family but disagrees with the housing that was shown, and for Minneapolis it is fine, but not in St. Louis Park and does not make sense. He stated he would like to see design criteria and density planning be a part of this process. Danya Neidich, 2020 Ridge Drive, stated she is supportive of the new zoning that allows for increased density for housing. She stated she encourages the city to provide additional aspects like density bonuses to developers who commit 20% of units restricted to 50% AMI or 40% restricted at or below 60% AMI or housing that is zero energy ready. She urged the city to follow the zoning changes with an expedient city review process and to streamline. She acknowledged that many can probably benefit from these zoning changes but are not able to attend a public hearing such as this, due to working non-traditional work hours, or working a second or third shift, or lack of adequate childcare or other reasons. She stated she works for Park Adam transportation which is the main school bus contractor for St. Louis Park schools. She added children she works with everyday that have had to move out of the city for one reason or another and they live 30 minutes or more from their school community. She stated they lose an hour of time for studies and other activities and the city needs to prioritize the quality of life for those who have been forced out of the community due to rising cost of living. Chair Divecha closed the public hearing. Mr. Walther noted the recent change to park and open space uses of the Rock Island (south parcel) and the limitations MNDOT placed on the use when the city acquired it at no cost. He also noted the city paid fair market value for the north parcel without restrictions on the use. He stated there is still interest and the possibility for development for housing for the north parcel at 2800 Toledo Ave. S. so staff has recommended rezoning the parcel from R-2 single- family to N1 in this process. He stated that the city expects there to be future public engagement process regarding future use of the land. He added that the staff recommendation maintains the status quo by converting the R district to N1 until additional information is gathered and more engagement with the community occurs to inform the council’s decision. He stated that in order to develop the property it would a comprehensive plan amendment to change the land use designation form right-of-way to low-density residential and that process requires a public hearing and 5 council members’ support. Commissioner Weber asked if this area goes to N1 there is no way to develop it without first going through another process to change land use designation. Mr. Walther stated yes. Commissioner Weber asked if something is designated park and open space, if the council wanted to change it to N1 later in this process, would it only be a simple majority of 4 votes to approve the amendment to this proposal. Mr. Walther that because this is a comprehensive rezoning 5 votes are required to pass the whole thing. 6 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 Commissioner Eckholm asked if there is any risk to rezoning the parcels to parks and open space, and if the council wants to put affordable housing there, is there any greater risk the process of the planning commission. Mr. Walther stated the planning commission responsibility is to make recommendations to the city council. He noted that the risk may be rezone to park and open space adds a barrier to development, but with enough support from this council or a future council they can change that decision. Commissioner Weber asked when the city buys a parcel, does staff have guidance from council that the parcel should be viewed as a default as developable as a way to recoup costs. Mr. Walther stated no, and it varies based on several factors, but staff follows the city’s adopted disposition of public land policy which provides guidance and avoids every inquiry from having to city council for consideration and action. Commissioner Hyman asked if a pedestrian bridge is proposed over Highway 100 for the Connect the Park project, if 2800 Toledo Ave is designated at park and open space does that put a barrier on being able to have a pedestrian bridge there. Mr. Walther stated there is an existing pedestrian bridge north of that site and Minnetonka Blvd. is about one or two blocks south, so MnDOT would not allow an additional pedestrian bridge across Highway 100 as they have certain spacing requirements, so it is highly unlikely that would be allowed, and it is not included in the city’s Connect the Park capital improvement plan. He added when Highway 100 was expanded the project added the noise walls and a trail was built connecting Minnetonka Blvd to the existing pedestrian bridge. Mr. Walther presented information about 3940 France on the border of Edina, St. Louis Park, and Minneapolis. He stated the city acquired the land from Minneapolis and previously leased the west half of the site for $1 from Minneapolis for park use. He stated it is zoned R-1 single family residential and designated park and open space in the comprehensive plan. He stated the city council at the time it was acquired stated they wanted to sell a portion of the site for development to offset costs incurred and paid more for the land to obtain fee title without restrictions on the land use. He stated this continues to be discussed with the present city council and initial opinion of the majority of members is to maintain the status quo on the east side of the site and preserve the option for future development. Staff’s recommendation is to change the zoning from R-1 to N1. The primary interest of those members would be in creating affordable home ownership opportunities. He added the west side which has been used for park and open space for many years is recommended to be rezoned form R-1 to POS. Commissioner Weber asked if this part of the parcel with the park project all to the south or included this parcel. Mr. Walther the parcel is adjacent to the Edina’s land and their flood mitigation project. Commissioner Weber asked if this affected the dog park there. Mr. Walther stated there was never a formal dog park there but added when the property was offered for sale to the city the overwhelming community feedback was to buy it and to control it, and there was interest from residents potentially work with Edina and Minneapolis to create a formal dog park, but there were no commitments from any of the cities to do so. 7 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 Commissioner Weber asked if the east part, then is undeveloped and used by folks walking through. Mr. Walther stated yes a small part of the east side has informal foot paths. Commissioner Eckholm asked about splitting this parcel in half, and would it be possible to instead do an 80-20% split to preserve the woods in this parcel. Mr. Walther stated yes that is an option. He added the west half is mostly in the flood plain, so it is not developable. He noted the east half was proposed because the new zoning district offers more creative options for development than just a single row of narrow lots along France Avenue, including the courtyard cottage housing type that has been added and defined in the code. Chair Divecha noted an email received and in the staff report referring to four park and open space parcels owned by the city. Mr. Walther stated he did respond to the resident’s questions and concerns that were noted in the email and clarified the proposal for the resident who had misstated the proposal in the message. He showed on the map the two additional parcels covered in the letter and that had not already been discussed. Commissioner Beneke noted the parcel at 9258 Club Rd there was a problem in this area in close relation to the school and asked if it is appropriate for development vs. park and open space. Mr. Walther stated originally an environmental assessment associated with a development project was rejected at this site, and the city acquired the parcel as an expansion of Cedar Manor Park and at the time it was discussed as possible uses as an outdoor classroom space for the school and maybe a joint acquisition of the parcel by both the city and school district. Mr. Walther stated the school district did not participate in the acquisition. He added recently there was interested in developing the property for a mixed use development with affordable housing and affordable daycare. Staff followed the disposition of public land policy and indicated the proposal conflicted with the policy. He added access to this property is difficult to Cedar Lake Road and would require cooperation and easements form the school or access would have to go through the city park to connect to 23rd Street to the north, and given it was acquired for park purposes, it is recommended to remain that and to be rezoned form single family residential to parks and open space. Commissioner Flanagan noted the proposed rules to require a 5-foot setback from the front of a house for attached garages and stated that would be his preference to allow garages to be in line with the front to the house. Mr. Morrison explained that attached garage standards to limit them to 50% of front façade standard and the 5-foot setback were discussed and recommended by the planning commission during study sessions before Commissioner Flanagan joined the commission. Commissioner Flanagan stated that the allowing them to be flush would seem to still be aesthetically appropriate for an attached garage and still satisfy the goal of not having attached garages jut out and dominate the facade. Commissioner Eckholm stated the style of house where that works is not what is being proposed. He stated if someone owned that rambler, that would stand. He stated the other 8 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 housing types that are being proposed to be allowed will have problems with fitting an attached garage and would push them to the front without this rule. Commissioner Flanagan stated if a duplex were built, would the garage need to be in the backyard. Mr. Morrison stated if in the backyard, then the garage for the duplex would most likely be a detached garage. Commissioner Youngquist stated these will apply to new construction, and ramblers will not necessarily be built in the future, and what exists today will be grandfathered in. She stated she agrees with Chair Divecha and Commissioner Eckholm that preventing this issue is not a large concern. Commissioner Youngquist asked about a definition about undue hardship that is included in the code, and if there is any reason to keep this and if not, should it be struck and replaced with a definition for practical difficulty. Mr. Walther stated that it could be deleted entirely or replaced as suggested. Commissioner Youngquist stated she preferred to have terms like this to be defined in the code rather than rely on outside resources. Commissioner Hyman stated she is concerned about spaces people have identified and they have advocated for those spaces, and then there are other spaces that people have not advocated for and as they are moved to N1 and are there concerns that these should go to R1 spaces. Mr. Walther stated staff has looked at sites that were adjacent to parks and addressed parcels that they were aware of but have not gone through every single parcel and there may still be parcels that are included in the rezoning to change from an R1 to and N1 district. Commissioner Weber stated staff did the right thing here to be lateral and go from the current zoning and move it to the equivalent in the new zoning. He stated whatever the commission recommends, the council can change again, but he is interested in a park designation for both parcels. Commissioner Eckholm stated the Rock Island park has been discussed for many years, and on the two properties being discussed, such as 2800 Toledo, the residents that have spoke do not want those areas developed. He stated if we want more affordable housing, it should be in the areas that are designated for high density development so they can utilize transit and biking, to get to places. He stated what has been heard from residents is that these open park parcels should be park and open space designated and not N1. Commissioner Weber added for the 2 parcels purchased at market value, he understands the need to absorb costs, but in some ways that has already been accomplished. He noted this is a bonus but will not make or break the city being able to function within their budget. Commissioner Beneke stated he is 80% sure he would ultimately support these 2 properties as park and open space but would prefer more discussion and process involved in that decision. Commissioner Youngquist stated she appreciates the move staff did with R1 to N1. She added regarding France Avenue parcel, she is concerned because it is guided as park land and the 9 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 comprehensive plan is the 20-year vision of what we see the community being. She is concerned it is zoned R1 right now, but it should go to park space in conjunction with the comprehensive plan even if the N1 district would allow that use. Chair Divecha stated at 2800 Toledo Ave., she is in favor of designating it as park and open space. She stated the France Avenue space is in the comprehensive plan and that is what it is guided. She stated our goal is not just density but multiple paths to affordable home ownership. Commissioner Beneke stated he supports the Rock Island parcel as park space. He stated he is more doubtful about the other parcel at 3940 France Ave. It was moved by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Eckholm, to recommend approval of the comprehensive plan amendment as presented. The motion passed unanimously. It was moved by Commissioner Youngquist, seconded by Commissioner Flanagan, to recommend approval to amend the zoning text amendment as presented by staff with the change of deleting the definition of undue hardship in Article 1 and directing staff to add a definition of practical difficulty. The motion passed unanimously. It was moved by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist, to amend the zoning map amendment as recommended by staff to change 2800 Toledo Ave. S. which is adjacent to Rock Island Park, to park and open space as zoned. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Beneke stated there may be a possibility of having housing in that space with cottage courtyard, resulting in 8-10 buildings, at 3940 France Ave so he will be opposed to zoning it park. Commissioner Flanagan agreed, and could envision duplexes or row houses along France, but this sends a signal to council also, but between those he agrees with park and open space. Commissioner Eckholm stated a part that has not been developed does represent a parcel that could be developed for affordable housing. He added there is a city-initiated development proposal to replace 4 single family homes on Minnetonka Boulevard with 8 properties, so the larger changes to the zoning map will afford more opportunities as housing stock continues to age. He stated the woods in this space is something he would like to preserve so he will support this amendment. Commissioner Beneke stated he is not necessarily in disagreement but does feel this needs more study. 10 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 Commissioner Hyman added she agrees it is important to understand the whole picture about this space and what it means to designate this as park and open space. Commissioner Youngquist added the comprehensive plan designates this as park and open space and state regulation require zoning to follow this and it is this in R1, but it is also signaling to develop this, so that is not consistent when the city does have park and open space zoning. She stated she has concerns about this and the long-range vision is for park and open space. Commissioner Hyman asked if there will be other opportunities in the process to watch this type of space. Mr. Walther stated yes there will be other opportunities when looking at other districts. It was moved by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist, to amend the zoning map amendment to change the designation of 3940 France Ave. S. to park and open space. The motion passed 6-1 (Commissioner Beneke opposed). Commissioner Weber stated he is appreciative of this process and the work of staff and what we are talking about is fairness and equality and giving more people the opportunity to live in St. Louis Park. He stated the zoning code has not changed since 1992 and we live differently than we did in 1992. He stated we are in a time when there is a huge demand for housing and this has not happened since the end of WWII, but back then St. Louis Park was not as developed and there was room to grow. He added back then also St. Louis Park did not let everyone in. While Jewish people were able to move to St. Louis Park from North Minneapolis, Black people were not able to come here since there were 1,800 racial covenants in place. He stated this time we need to meet the demand to give everyone a fair shot and address the missing middle. He added Rep. Larry Kraft is working at the capital to address the issue with the missing middle at the state-wide level and does enjoy support from both parties. He stated we must fairly address concerns that come up and the city works hard on this, and the city has good intentions, which counts for something. He stated we should always strive to do better. Commissioner Ekholm added his thanks to the city staff on the work to develop this and he thanked everyone that participated in the process and for coming out to discuss this tonight. He also thanked those who advocated for changes to the land next to Highway 100 and have championed Rock Island Park. Commissioner Beneke also thanked staff for their work on this and working to meet affordable housing needs as well and balancing the community’s input. Commissioner Hyman noted she joined the commission in the middle of this process but thanked staff for their help in understanding this process. She stated this is a good step in the right direction and this is not the end. She stated she would like to see higher density in areas that are not all in corridors with lots of noise and pollution and in different areas. 11 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 8, 2025 Chair Divecha stated the importance of the comprehensive plan, and she encouraged all to participate in the visioning process. Commissioner Flanagan stated as a new member of the commission he thanks staff and supports the direction we are moving in. Commissioner Hughes stated the discussion has been nice this evening, and if she could have voted tonight, she would have voted for what was passed. It was moved by Commissioner Flanagan, seconded by Commissioner Weber, to accept the zoning map changes as recommended by staff with the amendments as passed by the planning commission. The motion passed unanimously (7-0). 3.Other Business-none. 4. Communications. Mr. Walther noted the next planning commission meeting is January 15. 5. Adjournment – 8:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Mia Divecha, chair member 12 Planning commission January 15, 2025 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, John Flanagan, Estella Hughes (youth member), Sylvie Hyman, Jan Youngquist, Tom Weber Members absent: none Staff present: Laura Chamberlain, Sean Walther Guests: Bill Katter and Rick McKelvey, Hempel Real Estate; Evan Jacobsen, Tushie Montgomery Architects 1.Call to order – roll call. 2.Approval of minutes – none. 3.Hearings. 3a. Public Hearing: Terasa PUD; West End Office Park CUP and special permit amendment Applicant: Hempel Real Estate Case No: 24-28-PUD: 24-29-SP, 24-30-CUP Ms. Chamberlain presented the report. Commissioner Beneke asked about the vouchers and also distribution of 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom units and what is required by the city and what will be provided. Ms. Chamberlain stated the development includes 20% of the units at 50% AMI, and also requesting the city housing authority board allocates project-based vouchers for provide 30% AMI units. She stated that will cap how much is spent on rent at 30% of household income. Mr. Walther added the project-based units are federally subsidized for the difference between rents charged and the affordability at 30% of AMI. Ms. Chamberlain stated the developer subsidizes at the 50% AMI level and the gap between the 50% and 30% is covered by the voucher program. She added there is no specific requirements for each unit type with bedrooms. She stated when in preliminary talks with developers, which is discussed, and three- bedroom units are a priority of the city council so that is why they are included here. Mr. Walther added the housing authority required that the unit mix of affordable units to match the unit mix of market rate units in the building. He added this is all negotiated through the contract between the applicant and the economic development authority. Commissioner Hyman asked for clarification about staff’s proposed amendments to the conditions from what was presented in the report after “furthermore” and if it was everything 13 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 15, 2025 up to the end on page 7. Ms. Chamberlain stated items 1-4 should be omitted and items 5 & 6 should be renumbered to become 1 & 2. Commissioner Eckholm asked about negotiations with biking and transit and asked if reduced transit passes from Metro, for those living in the building is being discussed. Ms. Chamberlain stated yes and it is contemplated in the travel demand management plan draft which shows this is included for users of the site, and they are also exploring having real time transit information in the building as well. Commissioner Weber asked if the other two lots are owned by Hempel and if there are 3 owners in total. Ms. Chamberlain stated currently there is one owner for the 4 lots, Bridge. She added Hempel has a purchase agreement for the 2 west properties and Bridge will continue to own the two east properties. Bridge also owns a third office property to the east. Commissioner Weber asked about the special permit and if the other two lots get redeveloped, will this go away. Ms. Chamberlain stated yes if the two easterly properties redevelop in some manner, then at that time likely the special permit would be revoked. Commissioner Weber noted the EAW slide and asked if this is a city assessment of what could be developed. Ms. Chamberlain stated this was a maximum build scenario based on the current zoning and land use guidance to test possibilities and the infrastructure supporting the area. Commissioner Weber stated this is a dynamic and unique parcel that is right for a chance to go big. Mr. Walther stated the advantage of including the office tower in a future scenario was because office tends to have highest and most concentrated evening peak, so it helps test the impacts to traffic capacity in the peak hours and how well the existing infrastructure can handle this in the future. Commissioner Weber asked how many vouchers are in the city. Mr. Walther stated he does not know that number but can find out. He added in the last 5 years the number of vouchers have been added substantially after having been stagnant for many years and added the city is pleased to be able to serve more households. Commissioner Youngquist stated it is great to see the potentials for deeply affordable units at 30% AMI and asked if this will be St. Louis Park HRA vs. Metro HRA that handles the vouchers. Mr. Walther stated yes, St. Louis Park HRA would administer these. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the vouchers have been committed yet. Mr. Walther responded that they are not committed yet. Commissioner Youngquist asked about the tree replacement fund. Ms. Chamberlain stated this fund is dedicated and used to plant trees on public land. Mr. Walther added best efforts are made to plant trees replaced in the vicinity of the project and within 1 year of when the project opens. 14 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 15, 2025 Chair Divecha asked why the special permit allowing office in an industrial area is being maintained when it is now zoned as office. Ms. Chamberlain stated in discussions with the applicant and current owner, the current owner preferred to maintain the special permit for their properties. Mr. Walther added there was concern there might be some legal non- conformities that would result if that permit was removed. Chair Divecha asked if the green space will be used as a public space. Ms. Chamberlain stated the intention of that space is to be generally open to the public but privately owned, managed and maintained, and can include restrictions on the hours of use and programing on the site, with details arranged through the development contract. Chair Divecha asked about parking and if there is a certain formula for the number of spaces required per square foot of building. Ms. Chamberlain stated the city’s parking requirements for office uses are based off the square footage of the office building and today they exceed the city minimums, but if 37 spaces are removed for the shared green space there it will result in the parcel being below the minimum requirement by 15 spaces so those need to be accommodated to avoid the site from becoming non-conforming to the city parking requirements. Chair Divecha asked with shared parking will they have signs to make that clear. Ms. Chamberlain stated those details will be established through the actual shared parking agreement with the property owners. Mr. Walther stated he believes despite the shortfall based on the code requirements that the actual demand will be less and the site will have enough parking on its own, but the formulas in the ordinance require either a variance or CUP for off-site parking. Chair Divecha asked how the drive-through and pedestrian access for all the retail work. Ms. Chamberlain explained that in detail using the map. Chair Divecha asked if there are zoning requirements for drive-throughs. Ms. Chamberlain stated yes and explained that in detail, noting it is allowed in the office use district with the CUP. Commissioner Flanagan asked about idling in the drive-through and how exhaust impacts to residences above it will be handled. Ms. Chamberlain stated there are requirements for queuing spaces, but no requirements related to idling. Commissioner Flanagan stated that seems the idling under outdoor terraces seems like a disconnect with negative effects of exhaust. Commissioner Flanagan asked about the pedestrian path from the north and asked if there is a crosswalk there and if there is a plan to have one there. Ms. Chamberlain stated that could be a recommendation. Commissioner Hyman asked who owns the right of way on Park Place, Gamble, and Parkdale streets. Mr. Walther stated those are all city streets, and added the stop lights/traffic signals 15 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 15, 2025 along Park Place Blvd are controlled by MNDOT because they tie into Hwys. 394 and 100 signal systems. Chair Divecha opened the public hearing. Bill Katter and Rick McKelvey, Hempel Real Estate, and Evan Jacobsen, Tushie Montgomery Architects were available for questions. Mr. McKelvey stated they will address crosswalks, and noted staff explained the green space adequately. He added the terraces are 50 feet above street level and stated their HVAC system will adhere to intake rules related to this to avoid issue with the drive-through. Chair Divecha asked if there are retailers planned already. Mr. McKelvey stated yes, they do. Chair Divecha asked about the design, and stated she does not love facades that are not planned for pedestrians, and pedestrian access and she asked why they chose to do pedestrian access this way. Mr. McKelvey stated on a high-density mixed-use development it is more difficult, but stated this is a pedestrian-friendly design coming in from Gamble St. and from the south. He stated the drive-through is important for sales and economics related to the development. He stated some of those involved in reviewing the plan liked the drive-through option, especially those with mobility challenges and with small children. Commissioner Flanagan asked about the service vehicle entry. Mr. McKelvey stated the entrance is right entry only for service vehicles and deliveries and retail spaces. He added gate arms will control the entry. Commissioner Youngquist asked about the drive-through and about safe pedestrian access from the bus stop. Mr. McKelvey stated entrances are connected by sidewalks at all times, and more direct access is available when there is not a delivery vehicle loading/unloading. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the affordable units will be mixed throughout the building or concentrated in one area. Mr. McKelvey stated ordinance requires them to be distributed throughout and consistent with the building unit mix. Commissioner Youngquist talked about a restaurant development in the area and concern about Unteidts seasonal market being displaced again. She asked if the developer has had conversations with them yet about their location. Mr. McKelvey stated they have not had conversations with them yet and had not been contacted by them but are open to this discussion. Commissioner Eckholm asked if the developer is seeking assurances that the commercial tenants will build and use both entrances. Mr. McKelvey stated no, and added there is one primary entrance for the retail suites on the south. He stated on the grocery tenant on the north the entrance is still under negotiation and added a primary and secondary entrance would be nice. 16 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 15, 2025 Commissioner Weber asked if there is a grocer tenant in mind and if that is conditional on the whole development's success. Mr. McKelvey stated they do have one in mind but cannot say who that is. He noted they are not concerned if the grocer tenant does not commit to the development and are confident in its marketability either way. Commissioner Eckholm asked about the service drive pavement and if it is more like the sidewalk vs. the driving areas. Mr. McKelvey stated yes it will. Chair Divecha asked about the general economics to make this work with the drive-through and the units. Mr. McKelvey stated this was discussed with staff and their consultants and with the city council, the economic impact without the drive-through is more than $2 million, which would be significant. Chair Divecha asked if that would have impacted the affordability. Mr. McKelvey stated they would have had to increase the TIF request, and they wanted to minimize the term. Commissioner Hyman asked about the swing arm and how much space will be there for pedestrians. Mr. McKelvey stated when the interior swing arm is down, pedestrians will not be allowed to enter the space, when there is a service vehicle loading or unloading. Otherwise, the interior gate will be open 90% of the time. Mr. Jacobsen added there is a second traffic arm on the west side of the sidewalk that will prevent passenger vehicles from driving through at all times and limit access from the road to delivery trucks. Commissioner Hyman stated she is frustrated when pedestrian are waiting or getting on and off the bus and congregate and block the sidewalks, and she had concerns that the bus stop is against a building wall instead of next to an entrance to the complex. She stated she understands the rationale of the drive-through but is also concerned about space in that area for pedestrians at the bus stop. She asked if there will be adequate space for pedestrians waiting. Mr. McKelvey showed the slide and explained the location of the bus stop. Commissioner Hyman asked if it were not for the St. Louis Park parking requirements, how much parking would the developer want to have. Mr. McKelvey stated this design is correct and there is one stall per bedroom, so that is the target and the city’s parking requirement is appropriate. Chair Divecha closed the public hearing. Commissioner Eckholm stated he understands the concerns about the drive-through. He noted this is a big site and the developer is restoring a street grid to a site that has been curb cuts for over 50 years. He stated it is clear that they added uniqueness to the design, and he is appreciative of that. He stated he appreciates they are not just putting up a box. He stated while he prefers no drive-through here, he recognized the reality of it and to make it approachable and offer affordable housing for all. 17 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Jan. 15, 2025 Chair Divecha added she wants a walkable city, but she does appreciate the context of the tradeoffs and that this has a high target of affordable housing, and meets the city’s strategic priorities, and if the drive-through is a compromise, she supports this. She stated she supports mixed-use and hopes the city goes to this increasingly. Commissioner Youngquist stated there is lots to love with the development, she likes the articulation and the affordability of the project. She likes the green space also, but she is not a fan of the drive-through, however added she will not hold up a multi-million-dollar project because of that. Commissioner Weber agreed and stated he is indifferent about the drive-through. He stated there is nothing walkable about the space now, and noted even through the stores face the parking and backspace, once inside you feel you are inside a community. He stated with Park Place Blvd. and opposite a massive development like Costco, it is nice the developer has created a walkable space with shops in this area, and he will support this. Commissioner Hyman stated she is excited about this project and the housing. She asked about the bike parking and how much is open to the public for use, and is a car parking spot needed in order to have a bike parking spot. She added she wants bikes, pedestrians and bus users thought of and hopes also the city will make this more accommodating for pedestrians as well. She added she is like to see the green space moved closer to the housing part, but stated it makes sense where it is centrally located. She added she does not like the drive-through. It was moved by Commissioner Beneke, seconded by Commissioner Weber, to recommend approval of the West End Office Park CUP, Terasa PUD, and the special permit amendment subject to the conditions recommended by staff. The motion passed unanimously. 4.Other Business – none. 5. Communications. Mr. Walther noted the next meeting is Feb. 5, 2025, and will include a public hearing on city property owned on Minnetonka Blvd. west of Lake Street. He stated there will also be a study session following that meeting as well. 6. Adjournment – 7:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Mia Divecha, chair member 18 Planning commission: Regular meeting Meeting date: February 5, 2025 Agenda item: 3a 3a Minnetonka Boulevard twinhomes plat and planned unit development Executive summary Location: 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd. Case Number: 24-24-S and 24-25-PUD Applicant: Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) Eden Spencer, President Owner: City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority Review Deadline: 60 days: March 7, 2025 120 days: May 6, 2025 Recommended motions: Chair to open the public hearing, take testimony and close the hearing. Motion to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat and the preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD) subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Summary of request: Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) applied for preliminary and final plat and planned unit development (PUD) for the properties at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd. The applicant proposes to construct four twinhomes with eight total units fronting Minnetonka Boulevard; these will be zero lot line structures with one shared wall. Each lot would include an owner-occupied dwelling, enclosed garage stall, and greenspace. The homes will be sold under a community land trust with Homes within Reach. Supporting documents: Draft PUD ordinance; zoning map amendment exhibit; development plans; site renderings; neighborhood meeting summary and responses Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager / deputy community development director 19 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development Discussion Site information: The proposed development is located on four parcels on the south side of Minnetonka Boulevard, west of Lake Street. The city obtained the four properties and demolished four single-unit detached dwellings, with the intention of developing new affordable, owner-occupied housing types in the city. The western most parcel is separated from the other three by a public alley, as well as a sliver of private property owned by the Colonial Apartments, which is located to the east of the project site. Site area (acres): Total site area: 0.60 ac. (26,160 sq. ft.) 5639 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.15 ac. (6,442 sq. ft.) 5643 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.15 ac. (6,535 sq. ft.) 5647 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.14 ac. (6,293 sq. ft.) 5707 Minnetonka Blvd.: 0.16 ac. (6,890 sq. ft.) Minnetonka Blvd. 5707 5647 5643 5639 5801 Mtka Blvd Spirit of Christ Community Church 20 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development Current use: Vacant / four demolished single-unit detached dwellings Surrounding land uses: North: Single-unit detached dwellings East: Apartment dwellings South: Parking lot for adjacent apartments West: Religious institution Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning RM - medium density residential R-4 multiple-family residence Proposed 2040 land use guidance Proposed zoning RM - medium density residential PUD planned unit development Background: On July 6, 2021, the EDA entered into a preliminary development agreement with Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) to pursue development of owner-occupied affordable housing on four, EDA-owned, single-family properties located at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Boulevard. GMHC is partnering with Homes within Reach Community Land Trust which will establish a land trust on the properties prior to selling them to low-income qualified home buyers with the goal to provide several of the units to first-generation home buyers. GMHC proposes to develop four twinhomes on the site providing eight affordable home ownership opportunities. The units would be affordable to households earning up to 60 to 80 percent of area median income. The new twinhomes would be constructed as zero lot line structures with one shared wall. Each lot would include an owner-occupied dwelling unit, an enclosed garage stall, and greenspace. In addition to the twinhomes, the project proposes to regrade and pave the city alley, which is currently too steep to pave. GMHC plans to utilize design assistance programs to predict the homes’ energy usage as well as energy saving strategies to meet the city’s green building policy. Present considerations: The applicant requests the city: 1.Approve a preliminary and final plat to create eight individual lots. 2.Amend the zoning map and zoning ordinance to rezone the subject properties from R-4 –multiple family residential to PUD – planned unit development. 21 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development Site plan Preliminary and final plat analysis: The applicant seeks preliminary and final plat approval to create eight individual lots. Lots: The subdivision proposal will take the existing four lots and create eight individual lots. The lots range in area from 3,119 square feet (0.07 acres) to 3,445 square feet (0.08 acres). The density for the development is 13.3 units per acre. Block: Vehicle access to the development is served by an existing city alley, which connects north-south to Minnetonka Boulevard for the length of the properties, then turns east-west, connecting to Lake Street. The alley splits the development, with two lots to the west, and six lots east of the alley. Today, the alley is a gravel drive that is too steep to pave. The project proposes to regrade and pave the alley. Easements: Drainage and utility easements 10-feet wide are provided along Minnetonka Boulevard and the city alley. Each pair of lots have a shared lot line that do not have easements, but the other internal lots lines have a 5-foot easement. The developer will be required to obtain an access easement across a sliver of property of 5703 Minnetonka Blvd., which has the parking lot for the Colonial Apartments to the east. The access easement is needed to connect the western-most pair of lots to the city alley. Right of way: No additional right-of-way is being dedicated through this plat. Park and trail dedication: The parks and recreation advisory commission (PRAC) reviewed the park and trail dedication for the proposed development on December 4, 2024. They 22 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development recommended the property pay a fee-in-lieu for dedication: $6,000 for park dedication and $900 for trail dedication. Staff finds the preliminary and final plat meet city requirements. PUD analysis Description The developer requests approval of a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). A PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment that establishes the regulations for a specific property. The site is currently zoned R-4 multiple-family residential. Building and site design analysis The Minnetonka Blvd Twin Homes project meets the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the city to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1)The design shall consider the project as a whole and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. 23 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development (2)The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. (3)A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. The developer will utilize Xcel Energy’s High Efficiency New Homes program to meet the city’s Green Building Policy for twinhomes. Staff finds the plans meet this requirement (4)The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. The design of the buildings has an emphasis on energy efficiency. Staff finds the plans meet this requirement. (5)A PUD shall comply with the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy. All units are intended to be affordable ownership opportunities for households earning 60 to 80 percent of area median income (AMI). Staff finds the plans meet this requirement. Zoning analysis This development was designed to meet the city’s proposed zoning standards that are currently going through the review process. Because of the timing of this application versus the code update, the developer chose to obtain a PUD, but worked with city staff to meet the standards of the proposed N-2 district as much as possible. The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans, establish the development requirements for this property if approved. Further details on some of the zoning items are provided below. Zoning compliance table Factor Required Proposed Met? Uses PUD can establish Two-unit attached dwellings (twinhomes) Yes Dimensional Standards & Densities Min. Lot Area PUDs less than 2.0 acres may be approved only if it demonstrates superior design and greater compliance with comprehensive plan goals and policies can be attained through use of a PUD. 0.6 acres Yes Floor Area Ratio PUD can establish Floor area: 18,899 sq. ft. Lot area: 26,252 sq. ft. FAR: 0.72 Yes 24 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development Factor Required Proposed Met? Dwelling Units n/a 8 dwelling units 3-bedroom: 4 units 4-bedroom: 4 units Yes Density (units per acre) Comprehensive Plan: RM land use: 6-30 units/acre 13.3 units/acre Yes Building Height PUD can establish 2.5 stories – 26.4 feet Yes Setbacks PUD can establish Front: 25 feet Rear: 25 feet Side for shared wall: 0 feet Side, interior: 5 feet Yes Off-Street Parking Vehicle Parking Two-family – 2 spaces per dwelling unit (8 units): 16 spaces Each unit: 1 garage space, 1 driveway space Yes EV Parking No EV stations required None Yes Bicycle Parking No bicycle parking spaces are required None Yes Landscaping Minimum Landscaping Tree Requirement: 1 tree per lot in the boulevard (8 trees) Shrub Requirement: no shrub requirement Boulevard already has 4 trees: due to future Hennepin County road construction (2028) no more trees proposed within the boulevard Canopy trees: 9 canopy + 24 evergreen Ornamental trees: 25 ornamental Shrubs: 53 shrubs Yes Tree removal / replacement Total inches on site: 236 Total inches removed: 236 Tree replacement: 283 inches Proposed: 52 trees at 130 caliper inches Remainder: 153 inches at $225 per inch Fee-in-lieu: $34,470 Yes Impervious Surface PUD can establish (maximum of 60% is standard in the proposed N-2 district) 45% impervious Yes Architectural design Building Materials Class 1: 60% min faces visible off-site Class 3: 10% max Face Class 1 Class 2 Yes North 66% 34% East 62% 38% South 66% 34% West 62% 38% Use: The project is a single-phase residential development with eight two-unit attached dwellings (twinhomes). Four of the dwellings are three-bedroom units and four of the dwellings are four- 25 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development bedroom units. Each individual unit includes a one-stall attached garage, in-unit laundry, a rear deck, and front porch/patio space for outdoor recreation. Inclusionary housing policy: The proposed development would provide long-term affordability for owner-occupied housing units, as the homes would be sold to households with incomes between 60 and 80 percent area median income and the land would be held in a land trust for 99 years allowing long term affordability to the first and future owners. Climate action plan: The development will adhere to the city’s green building policy as amended in 2022 and intends to utilize Xcel Energy’s High Efficiency New Homes program to receive free design assistance that predicts energy usage, suggests potential energy saving strategies and estimates energy cost savings. The development will also include the following sustainable features: •Electric heating and appliances •Best management practices (BMPs) for stormwater management, including raingardens Architectural design: The buildings in the development were designed to meet the city’s proposed zoning code’s “house-scale” standards. The buildings are limited to 2.5 stories, and have gabled roofs and visual interest with the front porches that fit within the character of the neighborhood’s single-unit detached dwellings. The development has two different unit types, each with their own architectural details, allowing the development as a whole to look cohesive but not exactly the same. Vehicular parking: The zoning ordinance requires two parking spaces per unit for two-unit dwellings. The applicant proposes each unit to have a one-stall attached garage as well as enough driveway space for a second vehicle. Staff find it meets vehicular parking requirements. Electric vehicle parking: The zoning ordinance does not require EV parking for two-unit dwellings. Bicycle parking: The zoning ordinance does not require bicycle parking for two-unit dwellings, but each unit has an attached garage that could be used for bicycle parking alongside vehicle parking. Landscaping: Tree preservation on the site is challenging due to the required site grading and the added density of the development. As a result, the developer proposes a combination of tree replacement plantings and payment in lieu to meet the city replacement requirements. There are a number of trees on the site, including several dead or diseased trees that are proposed to be removed from the site. A total of 236 caliper inches of significant trees exist on the site, and the developer proposes removal of all 236 caliper inches. Because the application was received in 2024, the project will use the city’s 2024 tree replacement calculation: ((A/B)- 0.2)*B)*1.5, resulting in 283 caliper inches needed in replacement. The developer proposes to plant 52 trees as part of the project, resulting in 130 caliper inches being planted. After 26 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development subtracting the planned plantings, the remaining 153 caliper inches will be paid into the tree replacement fund, at $225 per caliper inch, resulting in a fee of $34,470. For planting requirements, the zoning ordinance requires one boulevard tree per lot; there are no shrub planting requirements for twinhomes. The boulevard already has four trees; the remaining four trees will not be added to the boulevard because Hennepin County will be reconstructing that portion of Minnetonka Boulevard in 2028. Instead, the required plantings will be on the property. The plan meets the city’s requirements. The plan proposes to plant nine deciduous canopy trees and 24 coniferous canopy trees, as well as 25 ornamental trees. The plan also includes 53 shrub plantings. Signs: There are no signs proposed for the project, beyond address numbers. Utilities: Each property will have individual utility services. There is capacity within the city’s utilities for the additional dwelling units added by this project. Neighborhood meeting: The developer held a neighborhood meeting introducing the development to community members on September 25, 2024. Six members of the public and a city council member attended the meeting. Community members asked questions about the level of affordability of the housing, long-term maintenance of the properties and buildings, and specifics about sale process and eligibility. Next steps: City council is scheduled to consider the preliminary and final plat and preliminary and final planned unit development on March 3, 2025. Recommendations: Staff recommends approval of the Minnetonka Blvd Twin Home Addition preliminary and final plat subject to the following conditions: 1.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this resolution, approved official exhibits, and city code. 2.All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 3.Prior to the city signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: a.A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the city to ensure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the city. b.A planning development contract shall be executed between the city and developer that addresses, at a minimum: i.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to, alleys, sidewalks, boulevards and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. 27 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development ii.Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure and driveway access easement across the property at 5703 Minnetonka Blvd. iii.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (alleys, sidewalks and boulevards), raingardens and landscaping. iv.The developer shall reimburse city attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final PUD approval. v.The mayor and city manager are authorized to execute said planning development contract. 4.Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a.Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. b.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. c.All necessary permits shall be obtained. d.The developer shall pay to the city the tree replacement fee. e.The developer shall pay to the city the parks and trail dedication fees 5.The raingardens and on-site water and sanitary sewer connections shall be privately- owned and privately maintained. Access to the systems shall be provided to the city for clean-out and inspection purposes when warranted. Access points shall be covered by a drainage and utility easement, as provided on the final plat. 6.Prior to issuance of a building permit, the following conditions shall be met: a.All necessary permits must be obtained, including the city erosion control permit, city tree protection permit, city right-of-way permit and permit from Hennepin County for work in the right-of-way. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary and final planned unit development for 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd. subject to the following conditions: 1.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved official exhibits, and city code. 2.All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 3.Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. b.All necessary permits shall be obtained. 4.Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: 28 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development a.A planning development contract shall be executed between the developer and city that addresses, at a minimum: i.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to, alleys, sidewalks, boulevards and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. ii.Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure and driveway access easement across the property at 5703 Minnetonka Blvd. iii.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (alleys, sidewalks and boulevards), raingardens and landscaping. iv.The developer shall reimburse city attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final PUD approval. v.The mayor and city manager are authorized to execute said planning development contract. b.Final construction plans for all public improvements and raingardens shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the city engineer for review and approval. 5.The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a.All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b.The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c.Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d.The city shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e.Work in a public street or alley shall take place only upon the determination by the city engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f.The developer shall install appropriate security measures. g.Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 6.Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy the following shall be completed: a.Public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation, and stormwater best management practices shall be installed in accordance with the official exhibits. 29 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development DRAFT Ordinance No. ___-25 Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating Section 36-268-PUD 26 as a planned unit development zoning district for the properties located at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka Blvd. The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (Case No. 24-24-S and 24-25-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36- 268-PUD 26. Section 2. The zoning map shall be amended by reclassifying the lands legally described in Exhibit A from R-4 to PUD 26. Section 3. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 36-268 is hereby amended to add the following planned unit development zoning district: Section 36-268-PUD 26 (a)Development Plans. The site located on properties legally described as Lots 1-2, Block 1 and Lots 1-6, Block 2, Minnetonka Blvd Twin Homes Addition Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD approved Official Exhibits: G100 Cover Sheet C000 Certificate Survey C001 Construction Notes C002 Construction Notes C100 Existing Conditions & Removals C200 Erosion & Sediment Control Plan C201 Erosion & Sediment Control Details C300 Site Plan C400 Grading Plan C500 Utility Plan C900 Construction Details C901 Construction Details A000 General Development Plan A100 Architectural Project Site Plan A110 Project Site Area Plan A200 House Type A - LL & ML Floor Plans A210 House Type A - UL Floor Plans & Roof Plans A220 House Type A - Exterior Elevations A300 House Type B - LL & ML Floor Plans 30 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development A310 House Type B - UL Floor Plans & Roof Plans A320 House Type B - Exterior Elevations L100 Landscape Plan L100.1 Landscape Details L200 Tree Inventory Plan Preliminary Plat Final Plat The Site shall also conform to the following requirements: 1.The properties shall be developed with four twinhome buildings, providing eight dwelling units. 2.The maximum height shall not exceed 27 feet and 2.5 stories 3.Parking shall be provided off-street in individual garages attached to each dwelling unit and individual driveways connecting each garage to the alley. (b)Uses. (1)Permitted uses: The following uses are permitted in PUD 26: a.Two-unit attached dwellings (twinhomes). (3)Accessory uses. The following uses are permitted in PUD 26 if the use complies with the conditions specified for the use in this subsection: a.Home occupations as regulated by this chapter. b.Gardens. c.Outdoor storage is prohibited. (c)Special Performance Standards. (1)All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, transparency, architectural design, landscaping, parking, fencing and screening requirements. (2)All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. (3)Signs shall be allowed in conformance with the N-2 zoning district. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council _____________________, 2025 First reading March 3, 2025 Second reading March 17, 2025 Date of publication March 27, 2025 Date ordinance takes effect April 11, 2025 31 Regular meeting of February 5, 2025 (Item No. 3a) Title: Minnetonka Boulevard Twinhomes plat and planned unit development Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney 32 33 34 35 LAKE STWVERNON AVE SMIN N E T O N K ABLV D MINNETONKA BLVD MI N N E T O NKA BL V DZARTHAN AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SXENWOOD AVE SWEBSTER AVE SLAKE STWVERNON AVE SMIN N E T O N K ABLV D MINNETONKA BLVD MI N N E T O N K A BLVDZARTHAN AVE SYOSEMITE AVE SXENWOOD AVE SWEBSTER AVE SPOS Park and Open Space R-1 Single-Family Residence R-2 Single-Family Residence R-3 Two-Family Residence R-4 Multiple-Family Residence R-C High-Density Multiple Family MX-1 Vertical Mixed-Use MX-2 Neighborhood Mixed-Use C-1 Neighborhood Commercial C-2 General Commercial BP Business Park O Office I-P Industrial Park I-G General Industrial PUD Planned Unit Development Existing Zoning R-4 Multiple family residential Proposed Zoning PUD Planned Unit Development ¯ 36 +286( :(67 +286( ($67   $$   +286( :(67 +286( ($67 %%   +286( :(67 +286( ($67 %%  +286( :(67  +286( ($67 $$                                           $//(< ( $ 6 ( 0 ( 1 7  6(7%$&. 6(7%$&.    6(7%$&.    352326('   (;,67,1*         352326('   352326('   352326('   352326('     (;,67,1*   (;,67,1*   352326('   352326('   352326('              6,'( < $ 5'6(7%$&. 7 < 3,&$/  )5217 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/  )5217 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/  )5217 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/  5($5 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/                3523(57< /,1( 72)281'$7,21 :$// 3523(57< /,1( 72)281'$7,21 :$//       0,1     0,1  6+$5(''5,9(35,9$7('5,9(       9,)%8,/',1* ',0(16,216      %8,/',1* ',0(16,216 *(1(5$/'(9(/230(173/$1 6FDOH    $ )7 (;,67,1*813$9('$//(< 72%(5(*5$'('$1' 3$9(':,7+&21&5(7( (;,67,1* &21&5(7( 6,'(:$/. 7+,63523(57<72%( ,1&/8'(',17+(29(5$// 352-(&76,7(:25. %876(3$5$7()520 ,1',9,'8$/+286( 3523(57,(6 0LQQHWRQND%OYG )5217 &21&5(7( :$//7<3 )5217325&+ $1'(175< 5($5'5,9(:$< 29(5+($' *$5$*('225 '(&25$7,9( /2:)(1&( 7<3 (15<0$5.(5 )($785( 1(:+,*+ 5(7$,1,1* :$// 1(:/2: 5(7$,1,1* :$// (;,67,1* $//(< 5($5(175< (*5(66 :,1'2: :(//)521767(36 (;,67,1*813$9('$//(< 72%(5(*5$'('$1' 3$9(':,7+&21&5(7( 325&+325&+325&+325&+ 325&+325&+ 325&+325&+ '(&.'(&. '(&.'(&. '(&.'(&.'(&.'(&. $ *(1(5$/ '(9(/230(17 3/$1 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW5HFRUG6HWV38'&,7<5(6321&()2/'(538'UHVSRQFH9:&DGGUDZLQJV38'6LWH0RGHO0LQQHWRQND%OGYFRS\YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' 352-(&76,7( :25. 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY +286(7<3(6 $ % +268( 7<3($ +268( 7<3(% 6,7(3/$1/(*(1'      3523(57< /,1( /,1(2)6(7 %$&. /,1(2) )(1&( +2855$7(' :$//  0,1&/5 5 Purpose of Standard District Housing Type 2525 Spacing & Scale Rear Yard Setback Minimum (feet) Dwelling, attached two-unit (twinhomes)N-2 5 Spacing & Scale Front Yard Setback Minimum (feet) Side Interior Yard Setback Minimum (feet) for Attached Garage or Lot with Alley 5 38'&,7<&200(176 37 +286( :(67 +286( ($67   $$   +286( :(67 +286( ($67 %%   +286( :(67 +286( ($67 %%  +286( :(67  +286( ($67 $$                                           $//(< ( $ 6 ( 0 ( 1 7  6(7%$&. 6(7%$&.    6(7%$&.    352326('   (;,67,1*         352326('   352326('   352326('   352326('     (;,67,1*   (;,67,1*   352326('   352326('   352326('              6,'( < $ 5'6(7%$&. 7 < 3,&$/  )5217 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/  )5217 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/  )5217 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/  5($5 <$5'6(7 %$&. 7<3,&$/                3523(57< /,1( 72)281'$7,21 :$// 3523(57< /,1( 72)281'$7,21 :$//       0,1     0,1  6+$5(''5,9(35,9$7('5,9(       9,)%8,/',1* ',0(16,216      %8,/',1* ',0(16,216 $5&+,7(&785$/352-(&76,7(3/$1 6FDOH    $ )7 (;,67,1*813$9('$//(< 72%(5(*5$'('$1' 3$9(':,7+&21&5(7( (;,67,1* &21&5(7( 6,'(:$/. 7+,63523(57<72%( ,1&/8'(',17+(29(5$// 352-(&76,7(:25. %876(3$5$7()520 ,1',9,'8$/+286( 3523(57,(6 0LQQHWRQND%OYG )5217 &21&5(7( :$//7<3 )5217325&+ $1'(175< 5($5'5,9(:$< 29(5+($' *$5$*('225 '(&25$7,9( /2:)(1&( 7<3 (15<0$5.(5 )($785( 1(:+,*+ 5(7$,1,1* :$// 1(:/2: 5(7$,1,1* :$// (;,67,1* $//(< 5($5(175< (*5(66 :,1'2: :(//)521767(36 (;,67,1*813$9('$//(< 72%(5(*5$'('$1' 3$9(':,7+&21&5(7( $ 352-(&76,7( 3/$1 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW5HFRUG6HWV38'&,7<5(6321&()2/'(538'UHVSRQFH9:&DGGUDZLQJV38'6LWH0RGHO0LQQHWRQND%OGYFRS\YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' 352-(&76,7( :25. 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY +286(7<3(6 $ % +268( 7<3($ +268( 7<3(% 5 38'&,7<&200(176 6,7(3/$1/(*(1'      3523(57< /,1( /,1(2)6(7 %$&. /,1(2) )(1&( +2855$7(' :$//  0,1&/5 5 38 ):$/.: VTIW ):$/.( VTIW /27( VTIW /27: VTIW /27  ( VTIW /27: VTIW /27: VTIW /27( VTIW /27: VTIW +286(: VTIW 325&+: VTIW 5:$/.: VTIW +286(( VT I W 325&+( VTIW 5:$/.(VT IW &21&3$'  : VTIW &21&3$'(VT IW '5,9(  : VT I W '5,9(( VT I W ):$/.: VTIW ):$/.( VTIW +286(: VTIW 325&+: VTIW 5:$/.:VT I W +286((VTIW 325&+( VTIW 5:$/.( VT IW &21&3$':VTIW &21&3$'(VT I W '5,9(: VTIW '5,9(( VTIW ):$/.: VTIW +286(: VTIW 325&+: VTIW 5:$/.: VTIW &21&3$'  : VTIW '5,9(: VT I W /27( VTIW ):$/.( VTIW +286(( VTIW 325&+( VT I W 5:$/.(VT IW &21& 3 $ '  ( VTIW '5,9(( VT I W ):$/.: VTIW +286(: VTIW 325&+: VTIW 5:$/.: VTIW &21&3$': VT I W '5,9(: VT I W ):$/.( VTIW +286(( VTIW 325&+  ( VT I W 5 :$/.  ( VT I W &21&3$'( VT I W '5,9(  ( VTIW +286( :(67 +286( ($67   $$   +286( :(67 +286( ($67 %%   +286( :(67 +286( ($67 %%  +286( :(67  +286( ($67 $$ 352-(&7$5($5()(5(1&(3/$1 6FDOH    $ )7 $ 352-(&76,7( $5($3/$1 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW5HFRUG6HWV38'&,7<5(6321&()2/'(538'UHVSRQFH9:&DGGUDZLQJV38'6LWH0RGHO0LQQHWRQND%OGYFRS\YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' 352-(&76,7( :25. 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY *5281')/225$5($5$7,2&$/& 3(5/27 29(5$//6,7( +286(:+286((+286(:+286((+286(:+286((+286(:+286((6,7( $$%%%%$$/276 VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW %8,/',1*)22735,17$5($ VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW ,03(59,286$5($ :,7+287%8,/',1* VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW 727$/*5266/27$5($ VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW VTIW 727$/,03(59,286$5($ %8,/',1*)22735,17,03(59,286 0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;727$/03(59,2865$7,2&$/& 727$/,03(59,286*5266/27 0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;0$;*5281')/225$5($5$7,2&$/&/27&29(5$*( 35,0$5<%8,/',1**5266 5 5 $ 352-(&76,7( $5($3/$1 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW5HFRUG6HWV38'&,7<5(6321&()2/'(538'UHVSRQFH9:&DGGUDZLQJV38'6LWH0RGHO0LQQHWRQND%OGYFRS\YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY 5 38'&,7<&200(176 39 ',1,1* .,7&+(1 /,9,1* +$/)%$7+83'2:1&/26(7 &(175$/+8% 325&+ '(&. 3$175< /LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6) VTIW               0,1&/5 5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 +286(7<3($0$,1/(9(/3/2253/$16 6FDOH    $ $  $  $  +285:$// $  +285:$// $ +286(7<3($ // 0/)/225 3/$16 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( $8383+: :$5'52%( :$5'52%( +: :$5'52%( :$5'52%( %$7+ %('5220 2)),&(6725$*( (175< *$5$*( 0(&+ &/ 0(&+ /LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6) VTIW *DUDJH$UHD*URVV6) VTIW              0,1&/5 5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 +286(7<3($/2:(5/(9(/)/2253/$16 6FDOH    $ $  $  $  +285 :$// (*5(66 :,1'2: :(// +285:$// +285 :$// $  $/7(51$7( /2&$,721)25 (*5(66:,1'2: :(// 325&+$%29( )227,1*67%' +285 :$// 5 38'&,7<&200(176 40 $ +286(7<3($ 8/)/2253/$16 522)3/$16 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( $ 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY %('5220 %('5220 &/ &/ /$81'5< %$7+ &(17(5+$// %('5220 &/'2:16((522)3/$1 )25325&+522)127(6 6((0$,1/(9(/3/$1 )25*$5$*(522)'(&.127(6 /LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6) VTIW               0,1&/5 5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 $  $  $  +286(7<3($833(5/(9(/)/2253/$16 6FDOH    $ $  +285:$//7281'(56,'( 2)522)'(&. +285:$//72 81'(56,'(2)522) '(&. 5 5325&+6/23('6 '6 '6 6/23(6/23(3(5)227'(&.6/23( *877(5 *877(5 6/23(6/23(6/23('2:16 3287 '2:163287 127( '2:163287(/%2: $1'63$6+%/2&. &225',1$7(:,7+ &,9,/ *877(5*877(5 *877(5 '2:163287              0,1&/5 5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 0/ // // 0/ // //'1'1*877(5 *877(5 '2:16 3287 '2:163287 *877(5 *877(5 *877(5325&+6/23(6/23(6/23(3(5)227'(&.6/23(6/23($  $  $  +286(7<3($522)3/$16 6FDOH    $ +286(%(/2: 6+2:1'$6+(' $  $5($2)5$7('522)'(&. 6+2:1+$7&+('   0,1   0,1 5 /,1(2)+285 5$7(':$// %(/2:5$7('522) '(&.   0,1&/5   0,1&/5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 38'5(9,(:&200(17 5() $ +286(7<3($ 8/)/2253/$16 522)3/$16 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( $ 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY 5 38'&,7<&200(176 41 +286(7<3($1257+(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $ 0/)/225   8/)/225   //)/225     /3 3$1(/ (,)6 &/$'' &/$'' /3 1,&.(/ *$3 6287+(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  325&+ /,*+7 0/)/225       0/)/225   +286(7<3($:(67(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $   8/)/225   :(67(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  &/$'' (,)6 /31,&.(/ *$3 #2+'225   //)/225   &/$'' +286(7<3($6287+(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $   0/)/225   8/)/225   //)/225   6287+(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  '2:1/,*+7 '2:1/,*+7 &/$66 $&&(17 6,'(,1* 7%' (,)6 /33$1(/ &/$'' #2+'225   0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66 /33$1(/ /31,&.(/*$3 &/$'' &/$'' /360227+3$1(/6,',1* &2/25$&&(17&2/257%' /31,&.(/*$36,',1* &2/250$7&+(,)6 :22'&20326,7&/$'',1* %2$5'6 &2/25'$5.*5$<%/$&. :22'&20326,7&/$'',1* %2$5'6 &2/250$7&+(,)6 +286(7<3($($67(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $   0/)/225   8/)/225   //)/225   ($67(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  #2+'225   &/$'' (,)6 /31,&.(/ *$3 0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66 (,)6 (;7(5,25,168/$7,21),1,6+,1* 6<67(0 &2/25:+,7(/,*+77$1 $ +286(7<3($ (;7(5,25 (/(9$7,216 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH$YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H 1RY3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,'  LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( $ 42 $ +286(7<3(% // 8/)/225 3/$16 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,' LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( % 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY $  $  ',1,1* .,7&+(1 /,9,1* +$/)%$7+ &(175$/+8% '(&. 325&+ /LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6) VTIW               0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5 +286(7<3(%0$,1/(9(/3/2253/$16 6FDOH    $ $  $  +285:$// +285:$// +:+: (175< %('5220 &/ %$7+ /$81'5< 0(&+ *$5$*( /LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6) VTIW *DUDJH$UHD*URVV6) VTIW              0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5 +286(7<3(%/2:(5/(9(/)/2253/$16 6FDOH    $ $  $  $  $  (*5(66 :,1'2: :(// +285 :$// +285 :$// 325&+$%29( )227,1*67%' 5 $ +286(7<3(% // 8/)/225 3/$16 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,' LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( % 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY 5 38'&,7<&200(176 43 $ +286(7<3(% 8/)/2253/$16 522)3/$16 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,' LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( % 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY $  $  %('5220 %$7+ %('5220 &(17(5+$// &/ &/ 6((522)3/$1 )25325&+522)127(6 6((0$,1/(9(/3/$1 )25*$5$*(522)'(&.127(6 /LYLQJ$UHD*URVV6) VTIW               0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5 +286(7<3(%833(5/(9(/)/2253/$16 6FDOH    $ $  $  +285:$//72 81'(56,'(2) 522)'(&. +285:$// 72 81'(56,'( 2)522) '(&. 5 5 $  $  325&+ 6/23( '6 '6 '6 6/23(6/23(3(5)227'(&.6/23( '6 *877(5 *877(5 6/23(6/23('2:163287 127( '2:163287(/%2: $1'63$6+%/2&. &225',1$7(:,7+ &,9,/ *877(5 *877(5 *877(5 '2:163287 *877(5 325&+ 6/23( '2:163287 '2:163287 '2:163287 //0/ // 0/ ////              0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5    0,1&/5    0,1&/5 5 +286(7<3(%522)3/$16 6FDOH    $ +286(%(/2: 6+2:1'$6+(' $  $  $5($2)5$7('522)'(&. 6((%(8,/'1*$66(0%/,(6   0,1   0,1 5 /,1(2)+285 5$7(':$// %(/2:5$7('522) '(&. 5 38'&,7<&200(176 44 $ +286(7<3(% (;7(5,25 (/(9$7,216 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,' LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( % 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY $ +286(7<3(% (;7(5,25 (/(9$7,216 8VHUVPDWWKHZKDOO/LEUDU\&ORXG6WRUDJH*RRJOH'ULYHPDWW#OXQQLQJZHQGHFRP6KDUHGGULYHV/XQQLQJ:HQGH6HUYHU/:3URMHFWV0LQQHWRQND%OYG+RXVHLQJ *0+&6/3 3URMHFW3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ3URGXFWLRQ'HVLJQ''3URGXFWLRQ+RXVH%YZ['UDZQ%\5HYLHZHG%\7ZLQ+RPH'HYHORSPHQWIRU0LQQHWRQND%OYG3URMHFW$GGUHVV6DLQW/RXLV3DUN0LQQHVRWD5(*,675$7,21 67$03 5(9,6,21  [6KHHW6L]H -DQ3ULQW'DWH 3URMHFW,' LUNNING ARCHITECTURE WENDE + PLANNING /XQQLQJ:HQGH$VVRFLDWHV,QF (DVW)RXUWK6WUHHW6XLWH 6DLQW3DXO01 S ,668(' +286(7<3( % 38'6XEPLWWDO1RY :(67(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  0/)/225   :(67(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  0/)/225   +286(7<3($:(67(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $   8/)/225   &/$'' (,)6 #2+'225   //)/225   /3% % +286(7<3($1257+(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $ 0/)/225   8/)/225   //)/225     /3 3$1(/ (,)6 &/$'' 6287+(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  325&+ /,*+7 /3 /$3 +286(7<3($6287+(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $   0/)/225   8/)/225   //)/225   6287+(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  '2:1/,*+7 '2:1/,*+7 (,)6 /33$1(/ #2+'225   &/$'' 5 +286(7<3($($67(/(9$7,21 6FDOH    $   0/)/225   8/)/225   ($67(/(9$7,216 727$/$5($ 6) &/$66 6)  &/$66 6)   &/$660$;  &/$'' (,)6 /3% % //)/225   #2+'225   0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66 /3% % /33$1(/ /3/$3 &/$'' /3%$25' %$77(16,',1* &2/257%' /360227+3$1(/6,',1* &2/25$&&(17&2/257%' /3/$36,',1* &2/257%' :22'&20326,7&/$'',1* %2$5'6 &2/25'$5.*5$<%/$&. 0$7(5,$/127(6&/$66 (,)6 (;7(5,25,168/$7,21),1,6+,1* 6<67(0 &2/25:+,7(/,*+77$1 5 38'&,7<&200(176 45 46 9059109049069079089099118958959009059 1 0 896897898 899 901 9029039049069079089 0 9 9 1 1 9 1 2 91391490 0 900905910915901902903904906907908909911912913914916916 895900905910 892 893 894896897898899901 902 903904906907908909911 895900905 891892893894896 897 898899901902903904906 895900 89 3 894896897898899901902 903 904 |||||||||||||||| |||| O FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO ////////////////|||////////|25//////////// ////////////////K>ZK<E,/E>/E<&EFO FO ϲϬΗZW dt/E>D ϭϱΗ^, 25 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~1 TYP 2 3 5 6 7 8 8 8 2 TYP 9 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 TYP 2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 5 6A 8 8 8 8 8 1A 1A 10 10 10 10 4 TYP 4 TYP 3 11 11 11 9 911 9 11 2 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~5 13 APPROX 12 APPROX 13 APPROX 12 APPROX 12 APPROX 13 APPROX 13 APPROX 12 APPROX h^Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/>͗͗Ͱh^Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK:d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EEdKE<>sͲ>hEE/E'tEͰtKZ</E'&/>^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^,d^ͰϭϬϬͲΘZD͘t'W>Kd^>͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd͗ϭͬϲͬϮϬϮϱϭϮ͗ϰϯWDϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z&ZdK KE^dZhd/KEEKd^E >'EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ dKd,^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘ Ϯ͘ WZKddED/Ed/EEz y/^d/E'&dhZ^EKd^,KtE &KZZDKs>͕Z>Kd/KE͕ ^>s'͕d͘ ϯ͘ d,KEdZdKZ^,>> dZD/Ed,/ZDE^E Dd,K^dKZhd,Z /^dhZ/Ed,Wh>/ZKt͘ ϰ͘ dKd,ydEd&^/>͕d, KEdZdKZ^,>>D/E/D/ d,Z^K&/^dhZEdK d,WZKWK^/DWZKsDEd Z;^Ϳ͘ ϱ͘ ZDKsy/^d/E'KEZd &dhZ^;͘'͕͘WsDEd͕ ^/t><͕hZE'hddZ͕ d͘ͿdKEZ^d:K/Ed>/Et/d, &h>>ͲWd,^thd^͘ ϲ͘ d,KEdZdKZ^,>>>Kd y/^d/E'hEZ'ZKhE hd/>/d/^/ED/EEdKE<>s ,K&KE^dZhd/KEdK WZD/dZs/^/KE^dKd,W>E^͘ EKd^ 1 ϭ͘ ZDKsKEZdWZKE ϭ͘ ZDKsKEZd Ϯ͘ ZDKs/dhD/EKh^ ϯ͘ ZDKs'Zs> ϰ͘ ZDKshZΘ'hddZ ϱ͘ ZDKs&E ϲ͘ ZDKsZd/E/E't>> ϲ͘ ZDKsZd/E/E't>>Θ^dW^ ϳ͘ ZDKs'hZZ/> ϴ͘ ZDKsdZ ϵ͘ ZDKs>&KZWZKWK^hd/>/dz ^Zs/^ ϭϬ͘ ZDKs>EKhdϰΖ>Kt 'ZKhE͕WEEKE ^Zs/ ϭϭ͘ ^thd ϭϮ͘ /^KEEdy/^d/E'^E/dZz ^Zs/d^E/dZz^tZD/E EEKEy/^d/E' ^E/dZz^Zs/WZd/> ^EͲϲKEϵϬϬ͘ ϭϯ͘ /^KEEdy/^d/E'tdZ ^Zs/dtdZD/EE EKEy/^d/E'tdZ ^Zs/͘ <zEKd^Twin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 BENCHMARK(S) (BMs) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: REG. NO. CERTIFICATION KATHRYN MELODY, P.E. 21770 NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL EXISTING CONDITIONS & REMOVALS Know what's R SBI N ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 JAN. 7, 2025 PUD - CITY COMMENTS 1 1 47 9059109049069079089099118958959009059 1 0 896897898 899 901 9029039049069079089 0 9 9 1 1 9 1 2 91391490 0 900905910915901902903904906907908909911912913914916916 895900905910 892 893 894896897898899901 902 903904906907908909911 895900905 891892893894896 897 898899901902903904906 895900 89 3 894896897898899901902 903 904 ////////////////25// //////K>ZK<E,/E>/E<&EϲϬΗZW 25 WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϵϭ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ WKZ, ;ϯ^dW^Ϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϳϱ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ ϱϳϵϱ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϬϱ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ ϱϳϬϭ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϰϱ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ ϱϳϳϭ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ ϱϳϰϭ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^LoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD ^ ^ ^^SFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSFSF^ ^ ^ ^  ^ ^ 894 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^895900 89689789898 899 90 /////////////^ ^LoDoLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDDLLLLDDooDDDLoDDLooDLoDLoDLoDSFSFSFSFDDSFSFSSFSSSSSFFFFFSFSSFSFSSSFFFFFLoDLoDSSSSFSSFSSSSFSSSSFFFFSFSFSSFSFSFSSFFFFSSSFSFSFSSSSFFFFDDSFSFFSFSSSFFFF90 0 89898 ^ ^ 3 3 5 4 4 4 4 SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF SF 2 2 3 6 6 ϬнϬϬ ϭнϬϬϮнϬϬϯнϬϬϯнϭϬ͘ϴϮϴϵϱϵϬϬϵϬϱ ϴ ϵ ϰ ϴ ϵ ϲ ϴ ϵ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϴϴϵϵϵϬϭ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬϰ ϵϬϲ ϵϬϳ ϵϬϴ ϵϬϮ ϵϭϬϵϭϭϵϬϮ ϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϯϴϵϱϴϵϱϵϬϬϴϵϲϴϵϳϴϵϴϴϵϵϵϬϬ ϵϬϱ ϴϵϴ ϴϵϵ ϵϬϭ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬϰ ϵϬϲ ϵϬϬ ϴϵϲ ϴϵ ϳ ϴϵ ϴ ϴϵϵ ϵϬϭ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬ ϰ ϴϵϴϴϵϳϴϵϳ ϴϵϲϴϵϱϴϵϵϴϵϵϵϬϬϵϭϮϵϭϭ3 1 3 3 3 2 BEGIN 2 2 END 7 h^Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/>͗͗Ͱh^Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK:d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EEdKE<>sͲ>hEE/E'tEͰtKZ</E'&/>^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^,d^ͰϮϬϬͲZK^͘t'W>Kd^>͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd͗ϭͬϲͬϮϬϮϱϭϮ͗ϰϱWD/dD hE/d YhEd/dz ZK<KE^dZhd/KEy/d  Ύϭ ^/>d&E >& ϯϴϬ /KͲ>K' >& ϳϱϬ ZK^/KEKEdZK>>E<d ^z ϱϬ /E>dWZKdd/KE  Ϯ KEZdt^,Khd  ϭ ZK^/KEKEdZK>DdZ/>^YhEd/d/^Twin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: REG. NO. CERTIFICATION KATHRYN MELODY, P.E. 21770 NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN Know what's R ϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z&ZdK KE^dZhd/KEEKd^E >'EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ dKd,^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘ Ϯ͘ ZK^/KEKEdZK>DdZ/> YhEd/d/^Z&KZ /E&KZDd/KE>WhZWK^^KE>z͘ d,KEdZdKZ^,>> dZD/E&KZd,D^>s^d, ydYhEd/d/^&KZ KE^dZhd/KE͘ ϯ͘ >/D/dK&/^dhZE;>KͿ ^,KtEсϰϮ͕ϲϯϬ^&͘ EKd^ 1 <zEKd^ ϭ͘ ZK<KE^dZhd/KEy/d;^d/> ͲϱKEϮϬϭͿ Ϯ͘ ^/>d&E;^d/>ͲϭKEϮϬϭͿ ϯ͘ /KͲ>K';^d/>ͲϯKEϮϬϭͿ ϰ͘ ZK^/KEKEdZK>>E<d;^d/> ͲϭϭKEϮϬϭͿ ϱ͘ KEZdt^,Khd;^d/>ϭͬϮϬϭͿ ϲ͘ /E>dWZKdd/KE;^d/>ͲϳKE ϮϬϭͿ ϳ͘ EKKE^dZhd/KE^^/^WZKWK^͖ ,KtsZ͕/&d,y/^d/E'>>z/^ E&KZKE^dZhd/KE͕ZK< KE^dZhd/KEy/dDh^d KE^dZhdWZd/>ͲϱKEϮϬϭ͘ SBI N ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 JAN. 7, 2025 PUD - CITY COMMENTS ΎZ&ZdK<zEKdϳ 1 1 1 48 ////////////////25// //////K>ZK<E,/E>/E<&E25 WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϵϭ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ WKZ, ;ϯ^dW^Ϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϳϱ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ ϱϳϵϱ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϬϱ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ ϱϳϬϭ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϰϱ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ ϱϳϳϭ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ ϱϳϰϭ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^LoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD 6 6 6 6 1 TYP 1 TYP 2 TYP 5 TYP 5 TYP 7 7 TYP 7 8 2 TYP 1 TYP 1 TYP 2 TYP 2 TYP 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 TYP 7 TYP A 9 1A 1A 1A 1A 1A h^Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/>͗͗Ͱh^Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK:d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EEdKE<>sͲ>hEE/E'tEͰtKZ</E'&/>^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^,d^ͰϯϬϬͲ^/d͘t'W>Kd^>͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd͗ϭͬϲͬϮϬϮϱϭϮ͗ϰϲWDTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 BENCHMARK(S) (BMs) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: REG. NO. CERTIFICATION KATHRYN MELODY, P.E. 21770 NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN ϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z&ZdK KE^dZhd/KEEKd^E >'EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ dKd,^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘ Ϯ͘ WZKWK^hZΘ'hddZ͕ /dhD/EKh^WsDEd͕E ^/t><t/>>ZYh/ZdK KDDKdd,WZKWK^ ^E/dZzEtdZ^Zs/^͘ ZW>d,hZΘ'hddZ͕ /dhD/EKh^WsDEd͕E ^/t></E</E͘ ϯ͘ ZW>y/^d/E'KEZd &dhZ^;͘'͕͘WsDEd͕ ^/t><͕hZE'hddZ͕ d͘ͿdKEZ^d:K/Ed>/E͘ EKd^ 1 <zEKd^ ϭ͘ KEZd^/t>< ϭ͘ KEZd^/t><ͲDd,/E </E Ϯ͘ KEZdZ/stz ϯ͘ KEZd>>z;^d/> ^dͲϭϭKEϵϬϬͿ ϰ͘ KEZdW&KZt^d K>>d/KE/E^;^Z, W>E^Ϳ ϱ͘ KEZdhZE'hddZͲ Dd,/E</E ϲ͘ /dhD/EKh^WsDEdͲDd, /E</E ϳ͘ Zd/E/E't>> ϴ͘ WZKWK^^DEd ϵ͘ KEZd^W>^,W SBI N ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE A ^/'E^,h> WZDEDhd ͘ KEtzKEKdEdZZϲͲϮ ;ϭϴΗyϮϰΗͿͲϭ^/'E Know what's R 1 1 JAN. 7, 2025 PUD - CITY COMMENTS 1 49 9059109049069079089099118958959009059 1 0 896897898 899 901 9029039049069079089 0 9 9 1 1 9 1 2 91391490 0 900905910915901902903904906907908909911912913914916916 895900905910 892 893 894896897898899901 902 903904906907908909911 895900905 891892893894896 897 898899901902903904906 895900 89 3 894896897898899901902 903 904 ////////////////// //////ϲϬΗZW WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϵϭ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ WKZ, ;ϯ^dW^Ϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϳϱ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ ϱϳϵϱ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϬϱ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ ϱϳϬϭ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϰϱ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ ϱϳϳϭ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ ϱϳϰϭ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^LoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD ϬнϬϬ ϭнϬϬϮнϬϬϯнϬϬϯнϭϬ͘ϴϮͲϱ͘ϭйͲϰ͘ϯйͲϭ͘ϵйϬ͘ϯйͲϱ͘ϲйͲϰ͘ϭйͲϮ͘ϲйͲϭ͘ϬйͲϰ͘ϵйͲϯ͘ϯйͲϭ͘ϵйͲϬ͘ϮйϵϬϱ͘ϴϬͲϭ͘ϬйͲϭ͘ϳйͲϮ͘ϲйͲϯ͘ϰйͲϭ͘Ϭй Ͳϯ͘ϱй Ͳϰ͘ϵйͲϭ͘ϮйͲϭ͘ϳйϬ͘ϭйͲϬ͘ϮйͲϮ͘ϮйͲϮ͘ϱйͲϬ͘ϬйͲϬ͘ϯйͲϮ͘ϱйͲϮ͘ϴйϮ͘ϴйϮ͘ϰйͲϮ͘ϴйͲϯ͘ϬйͲϮ͘ϴйͲϯ͘ϰйϵϬϮ͘Ϯϰ ϵϬϮ͘ϮϬ ϵϬϭ͘ϵϬͲϮ͘ϬйͲϭ͘Ϭй ͲϮ͘ϬйϵϬϰ͘ϱϬ ϵϬϰ͘ϱϱ ϵϭϭ͘ϰϮ ϵϭϭ͘ϴϬ ϴϵϱϵϬϬϵϬϱ ϴ ϵ ϰ ϴ ϵ ϲ ϴ ϵ ϳ ϴ ϵ ϴϴϵϵϵϬϭ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬϰ ϵϬϲ ϵϬϳ ϵϬϴ ϵϬϮ ϵϭϬϵϭϭϵϬϮ ϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϯϴϵϱϴϵϱϵϬϬϴϵϲϴϵϳϴϵϴϴϵϵϵϬϬ ϵϬϱ ϴϵϴ ϴϵϵ ϵϬϭ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬϰ ϵϬϲ ϵϬϬ ϴϵϲ ϴϵ ϳ ϴϵ ϴ ϴϵϵ ϵϬϭ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬ ϰ ϴϵϴϴϵϳϴϵϳ ϴϵϲϴϵϱϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϴϵϴ͘ϵϳϴϵϵϴϵϵϵϬϬϵϬϰ͘ϭϳϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϰ͘ϱϬϴϵϲ͘ϬϬϴϵϯ͘ϵϱϵϬϮ͘ϰϰ ϵϬϮ͘ϰϰ ϴϵϴ͘ϵϴ ϴϵϴ͘ϵϴ ϴϵϳ͘ϰϴ ϴϵϳ͘ϰϴ ϴϵϱ͘ϭϰ ϴϵϱ͘ϭϰ dtϵϬϯ͘ϬϬ tϵϬϮ͘ϬϮ dtϵϬϯ͘ϳϬ tϵϬϬ͘Ϯϵ dtϵϬϰ͘ϬϬ tϵϬϬ͘ϱϬ dtϴϵϰ͘ϬϬ tϴϵϯ͘Ϭϴ dtϴϵϱ͘ϬϬ tϴϵϯ͘Ϭϱ dtϴϵϲ͘ϬϬ tϴϵϯ͘Ϭϵ dtϴϵϳ͘ϬϬ tϴϵϯ͘ϯϭ dtϴϵϴ͘ϬϬ tϴϵϰ͘Ϭϱ dtϴϵϵ͘ϬϬ tϴϵϯ͘ϳϬ dtϴϵϵ͘ϰϯ tϴϵϵ͘ϰϯ tϵϬϮ͘ϬϬ dtϵϬϮ͘ϴϰ tϵϬϮ͘ϬϬ dtϵϭϮ͘ϵϲ tϵϬϮ͘ϱϮtϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ dtϵϭϬ͘ϳϬdtϵϭϬ͘ϳϬ dtϵϭϯ͘Ϭϰ tϵϭϮ͘ϲϳ dtϵϭϰ͘ϲϮ tϵϭϭ͘ϰϰ ϵϭϮϵϭϭϵϬϯ͘ϵϬ ϯ͘ϱйϰ͘ϰй ϯ͘ϱй ϯ͘ϱй Ϯ ͘ ϴйϱ͘ϯйϴ͘ϱйϴ͘ϱйϳ͘ϭйϰ͘Ϭй898.4896.7903.5^ ^ ^ ^  ^ ^Ͳϭ͘ϬйϬϬйϵϬϬϬϬ ϵϬϱϬϱ ϴϵϴ ϴϵϵ ϵϬϭϭϵϬϭ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬϰ ϵϬϲ ϴϵϴϴϵϴϴϵϴϴϵϴϴϵϳϴϵϳϴϵϳϴϵϳ896.7896.7894 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ϬϯййϵϬϬ ϴϵϲ ϴϵ ϳ ϴϵ ϴ ϴϵϵϵϵ ϵϬϭϬ ϵϬϮ ϵϬϯ ϵϬ ϰ ϴϵϲϴϵϲϴϵϲϴϵϲϴϵϱϴϵϱϴϵϱϴϵϱϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϵϬϯ͘ϵϬϴϵϲ͘ϬϬϴϵϲ͘ϬϬϴϵϯ͘ϵϱϴϵϯ͘ϵLoDLLooDD ͲϮ͘ϴйϮ͘ϴйϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰ͘ϭϳϵϬϰ͘ϱϬ90 0 89898Ϭϴϵϴ͘ϵϳϴϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϴϵϵϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϵϬϬϮ ͘ ϴ 898.4898.49907ϵϬϱ͘ϴϬϵϬϱ͘ϴϬͲϮ͘ϱйͲϬ͘ϬйϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϲϵϬϴϵϬϴϵϬϴϵϬϴϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϳϵϬϵϬϵϬϬϬϳϬϵϬϬϳϳϬϳϵϬϳϬϳϬϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬϵϬϲ͘ϵϬ0502903904Ϯ͘ϰйͲϮ͘ϴйϵϬϰ͘ϱϬ ϵϬϰ͘ϱϱϵϬϰ͘ϱ ϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϱϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϰϵϬϯ͘ϵϬ 903.5903 5 1 TYP 1 TYP 2 h^Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/>͗͗Ͱh^Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK:d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EEdKE<>sͲ>hEE/E'tEͰtKZ</E'&/>^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^,d^ͰϰϬϬͲ'Z͘t'W>Kd^>͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd͗ϭͬϲͬϮϬϮϱϭϮ͗ϱϲWDTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 BENCHMARK(S) (BMs) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: REG. NO. CERTIFICATION KATHRYN MELODY, P.E. 21770 NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL GRADING PLAN Know what's R ϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z&ZdK KE^dZhd/KEEKd^E >'EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ dKd,^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘ Ϯ͘ WZKWK^KEdKhZ^E^WKd >sd/KE^ZdK&/E/^, ^hZ&'Z͘ EKd^ SBI N ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 1 <zEKd^ ϭ͘ 'Z^^^t>t/d,Khd^K/> DEDEd;^d/>ϮͬϵϬϭͿ Ϯ͘ >KtWK/Ed 1 JAN. 7, 2025 PUD - CITY COMMENTS 1 50 |||||||||||||||| |||| O FO FO FO FO FO FO FO FO ////////////////||||25// //////K>ZK<E,/E>/E<&EFO FO ϲϬΗZW 25 WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϵϭ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ WKZ, ;ϯ^dW^Ϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϳϱ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||ϱϳϵϱ D>ϵϭϮ͘ϱϬ >>ϵϬϮ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϵϬϮ͘ϱϮ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϬϱ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ ϱϳϬϭ D>ϵϬϱ͘ϮϬ >>ϴϵϱ͘ϲϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϱ͘ϮϮ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ ϱϳϰϱ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϵ͘Ϭϴ ϱϳϳϭ D>ϵϬϵ͘ϬϬ >>ϴϵϵ͘ϰϳ WKZ, ;ϭ^dWͿ 'Z' dKKZ ϴϵϳ͘ϱϴ ϱϳϰϭ D>ϵϬϳ͘ϱϬ >>ϴϵϳ͘ϵϴ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^LoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoD LoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD LoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoDLoD 1 TYP 1 TYP2 TYP 2 TYP 3 TYP 3 TYP ϱϵ>&ͲϰΗ^E ^Zs/Λ Ϯ͘ϬйD/E͘ ϱϰ>&Ͳϭ͘ϱΗtdZ ^Zs/ ϲ>&ͲϴΗWs ^,͘ϴϬ ΛϮ͘ϬϬй ϭ Z/DсϵϭϬ͘ϱϬ /EsсϵϬϯ͘ϭϮ ϴϯ>&ͲϰΗ^E ^Zs/Λ Ϯ͘ϬйD/E͘ ϳϴ>&Ͳϭ͘ϱΗtdZ ^Zs/ϳϴ>&Ͳϭ͘ϱΗtdZ ^Zs/ ϳϲ>&Ͳϭ͘ϱΗtdZ ^Zs/ ϴϯ>&ͲϰΗ^E ^Zs/Λ Ϯ͘ϬйD/E͘ϴϭ>&ͲϰΗ^E ^Zs/Λ Ϯ͘ϬйD/E͘ /Es͘ϵϬϯ͘ϬϬ ϳ>&ͲϭϮΗZW ΛϮ͘ϬϬй D,Ϯ Z/Dсϴϵϯ͘ϯϵ /Esсϴϴϱ͘ϭϴ KEEdZ/d >dZ>;ϭϮΗͿ /Es͘ϴϴϱ͘Ϭϰ 4 h^Z͗<ĂƚŚLJ&/>͗͗Ͱh^Z^Ͱ<d,zͰZKWKyͰWZK:d^ͰϮϰϬϯϬϮͲϱϳϬϳD/EEdKE<>sͲ>hEE/E'tEͰtKZ</E'&/>^ͰͰt'ͰW>E^,d^ͰϱϬϬͲhd/>͘t'W>Kd^>͗ϭ͗ϭW>Kdd͗ϭͬϲͬϮϬϮϱϭϮ͗ϯϵWD^dZhdhZEE,^d/E'KZ Yh>dzWΘEK͘^/ ϭ ϮϳΗ/͘ZͲϮϱϴϴͲ D,Ϯ ϲϬΗ/͘ ZͲϯϯϱϵ͕dzW ^dKZD^tZ^,h>Twin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 BENCHMARK(S) (BMs) I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. DATE: REG. NO. CERTIFICATION KATHRYN MELODY, P.E. 21770 NOT F O R CONST R U CTI O N NOV. 18, 2024 PUD SUBMITTAL UTILITY PLAN Know what's R ϭ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>Z&ZdK KE^dZhd/KEEKd^E >'EKEϬϬϭEϬϬϮWZ/KZ dKd,^dZdK&KE^dZhd/KE͘ Ϯ͘ KEdZdKZ^,>>sZ/&zhd/>/dz >Kd/KE^E^/^t/d, Z,/ddhZ>EDWͬdW>E^ WZ/KZdKKZZ/E'DdZ/>͘ ϯ͘ ^Z,/ddhZ>EͬKZ DWͬdW>E^dKsZ/&zd, >Kd/KE^K&hd/>/dz KEEd/KE^͕hd/>/dzDdZ^͕ hE/d^͕KtE^WKhd^͕EͬKZ h/>/E'>/',d/E'͘ ϰ͘ ^D>>hd/>/d/^DzEdK Z>KddKKDDKd d,WZKWK^tKZ<͘ EKd^ 1 <zEKd^ ϭ͘ ^E/dZz^Zs/WZ/dzd/> ^EͲϭKEϵϬϬ Ϯ͘ tdZ^Zs/WZ/dzd/> tͲϭKEϵϬϬ ϯ͘ hZKyWZ/dzd/>tͲϭKE ϵϬϬ ϰ͘ hd/>/dzdZE,ysd/KE ^,>>EKdt/d,/EdZΖ^ Z/W>/EKE^͘ SBI N ( IN FEET ) GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 JAN. 7, 2025 PUD - CITY COMMENTS 1 51 (4) RUSSIAN SAGE 'LITTLE SPIRE' (6) ASTILBE 'DEUTSCHLAND'(8) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL' BLACK ALUM EDGING (3) JUNIPER 'MEDORA' 5' HGT. (14) SWITCH GRASS (4) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 'NIGHTGLOW' (5) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER' (3) ARBORVITAE 'TECHNY' 5' HGT. (3) JUNIPER 'MEDORA' 5' HGT. (3) ARBORVITAE 'TECHNY' 5' HGT. (2) HYDRANGEA 'LIMELIGHT' (2) SERVICEBERRY (6) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE' (9) DAYLILY 'CHICAGO APACHE' (2) COFFEETREE 'ESPRESSO' (3) RIVER BIRCH (3) RED CEDAR (1) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW' (2) OAK 'CRIMSON SPIRE' (1) OHIO BUCKEYE (3) JUNIPER 'MEDORA' 34" TRAP ROCK GRAVEL (5) SPIREA 'TOR' (16) YARROW 'MOONSHINE' (8) LIATRIS 'KOBOLD' 30'-8" (3) RED CEDAR (5) SPIREA 'TOR' (1) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW' (16) YARROW 'MOONSHINE' (6) LIATRIS 'KOBOLD' (3) PAGODA DOGWOOD (3) SERVICEBERRY 'AUTUMN BRILL' (4) HAWTHORN (1) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW' (3) REDBUD (1) ASPEN (9) DAYLILY 'CHICAGO APACHE' (10) CATMINT 'WALKERS LOW' (10) CATMINT 'WALKERS LOW' (6) TAUNTON YEW (2) HYDRANGEA 'BERRY WHITE' (2) HYDRANGEA 'BERRY WHITE' (3) TAUNTON YEW (34) ALLIUM 'MILLENIUM' (34) BERGANIA 'WINTER GLOW' (6) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE' (2) SERVICEBERRY (4) RUSSIAN SAGE 'LITTLE SPIRE' (14) SWITCH GRASS (4) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 'NIGHTGLOW' (6) ASTILBE 'DEUTSCHLAND' (2 (3) RED CEDAR (12) DAYLILY 'SUNDAY GLOVES (6) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL' (4) IRIS 'RUFFLED VELVET' (4) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE' (6) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER' (12) DAYLILY 'SUNDAY GLOVES (6) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL' (4) IRIS 'RUFFLED VELVET' (4) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE' (6) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER' AA RRRR (20) JUNIPER 'GREY OWL' (9) JUNIPER 'MEDORA' 5' HGT. (17) GRASS 'KARL FOERSTER' (6) ARBORVITAE 'TECHNY' 5' HGT. (2) HYDRANGEA 'LIMELIGHT' #25 CONT (16) HYDRANGEA 'ANNABELLE' (18) DAYLILY 'CHICAGO APACHE' (2) COFFEETREE 'ESPRESSO' (3) RIVER BIRCH (9) RED CEDAR (2) OAK 'CRIMSON SPIRE' (1) OHIO BUCKEYE (10) SPIREA 'TOR' (14) LIATRIS 'KOBOLD' (2) CRABAPPLE 'SPRING SNOW' 2.5" CAL. (32) YARROW 'MOONSHINE' (3) PAGODA DOGWOOD 2.5" CAL. (7) SERVICEBERRY 'AUTUMN BRILL' 2.5" CAL. (4) RUSSIAN HAWTHORN, 2.5" CAL. (3) REDBUD 2.5" CAL. (1) ASPEN (20) CATMINT 'WALKERS LOW' (4) HYDRANGEA 'BERRY WHITE' #25 CONT (34) BERGANIA 'WINTER GLOW' (8) RUSSIAN SAGE 'LITTLE SPIRE' (28) SWITCH GRASS (8) BUSH HONEYSUCKLE 'NIGHTGLOW' (12) ASTILBE 'DEUTSCHLAND' (24) DAYLILY 'SUNDAY GLOVES (8) IRIS 'RUFFLED VELVET' CANOPY LARGE TREES, 2.5" CALIPER PERENNIALS, #1 CONT. SHRUBS, #5 CONT. EVERGREEN TREES, 2.5" CALIPER/ 6' HGT (9) TAUNTON YEW ORNAMENTAL TREES, 2.5" CALIPER & #25 CONTS 1234 BLUESTONE ENTRY/ ADDRESS MARKER POURED CONC. FTG 3'1'-6" CHURCH PARKING LOT CURB 915.5 TW 913.0 BW 904.0 PROPERTY LINE 9'3' 6'-6" CHURCH PARKING LOT CURB 915.5 TW 913.0 BW 904.0 PROPERTY LINE 3' 5'-9" 2'-3"4'-6"5'OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN SCALE= 1" = 12'-0"1 LANDSCAPE PLANTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 PLANT SCHEDULE2 PUD SUMBITTAL NOV, 18 2024ENTRY/ ADDRESS MARKER3 WEST SIDE- SINGLE RETAINING WALL SECTION4 SCALE= 1" = 12'-0" SCALE= 1" = 4'-0" WEST SIDE- DOUBLE RETAINING WALL SECTION5SCALE= 1" = 4'-0"VERTICAL WALL R-1 12/23/2024 PUD, CITY COMMENTS 36" HGT, BLACK ALUM FENCE & GATE 52 PLANTING NOTES SCALE= NTS1 LANDSCAPE DETAILSTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 NOTES: 1. LOCATE FLARE OF TRUNK PRIOR TO EXCAVATING PLANTING PIT. REMOVE ROOTBALL SOIL TO EXPOSE TOP OF FLARE. 2 AFTER SETTING ROOTBALL IN PLANTING PIT, REMOVE ALL NON-BIODEGRABLE WRAP MATERIAL AND/OR CORD. BACKFILL PIT TO 12 DEPTH AND WATER THOROUGHLY. CUT AND REMOVE AT MINIMUM TOP 13 OF BURLAP AND TWINE. COMPLETE BACKFILLING AND WATER UNTIL SATURATED. MULCH TO 3" DEPTH ON DAY OF PLANTING. 3. GUY ASSEMBLY IS OPTIONAL, HOWEVER CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREE IN UPRIGHT POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 4. AFTER INSTALLATION, TRIM OUT DEAD OR DEFORMED MATERIAL. DO NOT PRUNE CENTRAL LEADER. OPTIONAL- GUY WIRES SHALL BE 18" DIA. GALV. STEEL CABLE. WIRES SHALL ATTACH TO 2" WIDE MIN. NYLON MESH SLINGS AROUND TREE TRUNK. SLINGS SHALL BE PLACED A MIN. OF 23 UP TRUNK OF TREE. GUY WIRES SHALL BE SET INTO GROUND WITH DUCK-BILL EARTH ANCHOR OR APPROVED EQUAL. PLANTING PIT SHALL BE TWICE THE WIDTH OF THE ROOTBALL. SCARIFY SIDES OF PLANTING PIT. EXISTING NATIVE SOILS 3" DARK HARDWOOD MULCH STAKING- (OPTIONAL): STAKING OF TREES IS OPTIONAL BUT, CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN TREE IN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THE DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. TREES WITH BE REJECTED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: -POOR FORM -DAMAGED TRUNK -BURIED ROOT FLARES -ENCIRCLING TRANSPORT ROOTS -UNCONSOLIDATED ROOTBALL SOIL (DUE TO EXCESSIVE HANDLING) LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SCHEDULE INSPECTION 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PLACING MULCH AROUND THE TREE PLANTINGS. AFTER SETTING ROOT BALL IN PIT, BACKFILL TO WITHIN 12" OF TOP OF ROOTBALL AND SATURATE WITH WATER. -CUT AND REMOVE TO BACKFILL LINE ALL TWINE, WIRE AND/OR BURLAP. -BACKFILL UNTIL PIT IS FULL, WATER AGAIN. BACKFILL WITH 1/2 NATIVE SOILS AND 1/2 PLANTING SOIL. MIX THOROUGHLY. SEE SPEC. 3" DARK HARDWOOD MULCH X 6 FT DIAMETER PULL AWAY FROM TRUNK OF TREE TREE WRAP TO 6" BELOW FIRST BRANCH. WRAP TO BE REMOVED DURING GROWING SEASON.AFTER INSTALLATION, TRIM OUT DEADWOOD AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT LEADER. FLARE, SET AT 1"-2" ABOVE SURROUNDING GRADE. SEE NOTE ABOVE DISH PLANTING PIT. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PIT UNDISTURBED SOIL OR COMPACTED SUBGRADE 2X DIA. OF ROOTBALL CREATE EDGE WITH EDGING MACHINE 36" HGT, PLANT PROTECTION FENCING TO RUN CONTINUOUS AROUND TREE AND SHRUB BEDS UNTIL PLANTS ARE ESTABLISHED. STAKE TREES WITH 6' STEEL FENCE POSTS. (2) PER TREE. TRIM OUT BROKEN & DEAD STEMS ONLY. SPACE PLANTS ACCORDING TO PLANT SCHEDULE. PLANTING SOIL ( 13 MNDOT 3877-2 SELECT BORROW TOPSOIL+ 13 COMPOST + 13 CLEAN WASHED SAND). SEE SPEC. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING HOLE. UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILS. 3" DARK SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. PULL MULCH AWAY FROM STEMS OF PLANTS TO PREVENT ROTTING. 36" HGT, PLANT PROTECTION FENCING TO RUN CONTINUOUS AROUND TREE AND SHRUB BEDS UNTIL PLANTS ARE ESTABLISHED. 3" DARK HARDWOOD MULCH PULL MULCH AWAY FROM ALL STEMS TO PREVENT ROTTING. TRIM OUT BROKEN & DEAD STEMS ONLY. 3" DARK HARDWOOD MULCH FINISHED GRADE PLANTING SOIL. SEE SPEC. SCARIFIY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF PLANTING HOLE. UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILS DIAMETER OF POTS TO BE PLANTED SPACING VARIES36" HGT, PLANT PROTECTION FENCING TO RUN CONTINUOUS AROUND TREE AND SHRUB BEDS UNTIL PLANTS ARE ESTABLISHED. EVERGREEN TREE DETAIL SCALE= NTS2 DECID. TREE DETAIL SCALE= NTS3 SCALE= NTS4PERENNIAL DETAIL SCALE= NTS5SHRUB DETAIL PUD SUMBITTAL NOV, 18 2024 R-1 12/23/2024 PUD, CITY COMMENTS 53 3. 15" SPRUCE, DEAD 5. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 18. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 4. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 7. SIGNIFICANT: 50" COTTONWOOD, FAIR 17. 36" BOXELDER, POOR 16. SIGNIFICANT: 60" SILVER MAPLE, FAIR 15. 60" SIBERIAN ELM, POOR 9.12" SPRUCE, POOR, DEAD 8.12" SPRUCE, POOR, DEAD 1. 50" BUR OAK, POOR, DEAD 2. SIGNIFICANT: 20" HACKBERRY, FAIR 6. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 14. SIGNIFICANT: 8" HACKBERRY, FAIR 13. SIGNIFICANT: 12" HACKBERRY, FAIR 12. SIGNIFICANT: 6" HACKBERRY, FAIR 11. SIGNIFICANT: 6" AM. ELM, FAIR 10. SIGNIFICANT: 8" AM. ELM, FAIR OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS. TREE TO BE PRUNED OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS. TREE TO BE PRUNED OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS. TREE TO BE PRUNED OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS TREE. TO BE PRUNED OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS/ DEAD OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS/ DEAD OUTSIDE PROPERTY LIMITS/ DEAD 19. SIGNIFICANT: 6" CRABAPPLE, FAIR RRRRY, FAIRR ERRY IRRRERRY, FAIRERRYFAIR M,FAIRIRRIRIIRRMFARRRRRIRIIRIRI FAFAAIRRRRAIRAIRRRRR BERRBERR RRY FAIRRY FAIR AIRIRIRIRRRIIR ,LE, FAIRLE, FAIR OU AIRAIR OD, FAIRRRROD,FAIROD,FAIR FAIRRRRFAIRRRRFAIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR D EXTEND FENCING AFTER DRIVEWAY IS REMOVED EXTEND FENCING AFTER DRIVEWAY IS REMOVED EXTEND FENCING AFTER DRIVEWAY IS REMOVED ROOTS CUT/ DAMAGED MUST BE PAINTED/ SEALED AND BURIED AFTER CUTTING TREE PROTECTION FENCING PER DETAIL TREE TO BE REMOVED "SIGNIFICANT" TREE, TYP. "PUBLIC" TREE, TYP. "PRIVATE" TREE ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY TO BE PRUNED, TYP. PLAN VIEW NOTES: 1) ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE PLANS PRIOR TO ANY DEMOLITION. AFTER DEMOLITION OR AS NECESSARY, TREE PROTECTION FENCING MAY BE RELOCATED WITH APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AND EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE DURATION OF THE CONSTRUCTION PERIOD 2) CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STORE ANY MATERIALS OR PARK ANY VEHICLES IN TREE PROTECTION ZONES. THE FENCE SHALL PREVENT TRAFFIC MOVEMENT AND THE PLACEMENT OF TEMPORARY FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT, STOCKPILES AND SUPPLIES FROM HARMING VEGETATION WITHIN THE LIMITS OF PROTECTION. 3) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLEANLY CUT ALL ROOTS EXPOSED BY GRADING AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 4) THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE DESIGNATED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AND STAGING AREAS TREE PROTECTION FENCING: 48" ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING . FASTEN TO POSTS WITH GALVANIZED WIRE TIES POSTS: 7' U-CHANNEL 1.12 LBS/FOOT STRENGTH PAINTED OR GALVANIZED FENCE: MEET OR EXCEED Mn/DOT 2572.2B (2000) DRIPLINE VARIES. SET FENCE MIN 12" OUTSIDE DRIPLINE. DRIPLINE VARIES 5' MAX 5' MAX. POST S P A CI N G 12"FROM DRIP L I N E 3. 15" SPRUCE, DEAD 5. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 18. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 4. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 7. SIGNIFICANT: 50" COTTONWOOD, FAIR 17. 36" BOXELDER, FAIR 16. SIGNIFICANT: 60" SILVER MAPLE, FAIR 15. 60" SIBERIAN ELM, POOR 9.12" SPRUCE, POOR, DEAD 8.12" SPRUCE, POOR, DEAD 1. 50" BUR OAK, POOR, DEAD 2. SIGNIFICANT: 20" HACKBERRY, FAIR 6. SIGNIFICANT: 15" SPRUCE, FAIR 14. SIGNIFICANT: 8" HACKBERRY, FAIR 13. SIGNIFICANT: 12" HACKBERRY, FAIR 12. SIGNIFICANT: 6" HACKBERRY, FAIR 11. SIGNIFICANT: 6" AM. ELM, FAIR 10. SIGNIFICANT: 8" AM. ELM, FAIR TREE LIST: 19. SIGNIFICANT: 6" CRABAPPLE, FAIR TOTAL SIGNIFICANT CALIPER INCHES REMOVED= 236" ((A/B)-0.20) x 1.5 x A = C A = Total diameter inches of significant trees removed B = Total diameter inches of significant trees on property C = Replacement number of caliper inches ((236/236)-0.20) x 1.5 x 236 = 283" caliper required. TREE REPLACEMENT CALCS: TREE INVENTORY PLAN SCALE= 1" = 12'-0"1 TREE PROTECTION DETAIL SCALE= 1" = 12'-0"2SIGNIFICANT TREE LIST & CALCS SCALE= NTS3 TREE INVENTORY PLANTwin Home Development for:Minnetonka BlvdSaint Louis Park,MinnesotaLunning Wende Associates, Inc. 275 East Fourth Street, Suite 620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 p:651.221.0915 PUD SUMBITTAL NOV, 18 2024 R-1 12/23/2024 PUD, CITY COMMENTS 54 St Louis Park – Minnetonka Blvd Twin Homes Neighborhood Meeting 9/25/24 Seven attendees Notes/Questions: Who is the developer and who will sell the homes? The development of the site includes 4 twin homes for a total of 8 units that will be for sale at an affordable price. This is in partnership with the City of St. Louis Park who currently owns the site. The developer is Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation who is a non-profit organization whose mission is to preserve, improve and increase affordable housing for low to moderate income individuals. Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation was created in 1970 and is a nationally recognized leader in affordable housing. Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation is working with Homes within Reach (HWR) which is a community land trust (CLT) organization that serves west Hennepin County communities. Since 2001, HWR has helped over 258 workforce families earning less than 80% Area Median Income (AMI) become homeowners by acquiring, remodeling and selling properties through proven Community Land Trust practice (CLT) that: •Allows qualified clients to purchase the home and lease the land at a nominal fee. •Reduces the mortgage, down payment and closing costs. HWR will facilitate the sale of the homes through the Community Land Trust Program which establishes initial affordability by removing the market value of the land from the mortgage equation. A CLT sells just the home, and not the land, to a low-to-moderate-income household. The CLT retains ownership of the land and enters into a 99-year Ground Lease with the leaseholder- homeowner at a nominal fee. Removing the land value from the mortgage equation reduces the mortgage, down payment and closing costs. A CLT also ensures permanent affordability of the home through two provisions found in Ground Lease. 55 •A pricing formula that provides the owner with a fair amount of equity while also ensuring that the sale price for subsequent low-to moderate-income households remains affordable. •A provision that requires the homeowner to sell either to another low-to -moderate-income household or to the CLT. In addition, the provisions ensure the home continues to be affordable with each sale. A CLT leaseholder-homeowner receives benefits similar to non-CLT homeowners such as the ability to build equity, utilize federal mortgage interest and property tax deductions, and the ability to transfer the lease interest and home to their heirs. HWR maintains a goal of serving residents in the city they work in. When the homes are ready to be put up for sale HWR will review applicants and prioritize those who live and work in the City of St. Louis Park and will work with the city staff to market the homes to local residents first. What will the sales price of the home be? How are you able to sell them at an affordable price? •The sale price of the units is expected to be approximately $400,000 to $430,000. Based upon the Community Land Trust model and with supportive county, state and federal homebuyer programs, the units will be sold for approximately $225,000 to $250,000. Is there an agreement with the owners or an association that deals with long term maintenance such as roof, siding, fences, etc.? •There will not be a homeowner’s association but through Homes within Reach Community Land Trust each homeowner is required to sign a shared party wall agreement which outlines processes and procedures for shared maintenance of the units. •In addition, the project incorporates the high quality of materials to ensure long term maintenance of the units such as higher-grade roof shingles, quality internal and external products, energy star appliances, solar ready, high-grade, energy efficient windows, etc. What is the landscape plan, and can the project incorporate low maintenance trees, shrubs and grass? •A landscape plan will be prepared for the project and approved by the city. The project will incorporate low maintenance landscaping and green areas in accordance with stormwater management requirements. Is there an opportunity to incorporate some design elements that match with other homes in the neighborhood? •The architectural plans for the homes were designed as an updated traditional style that creates the most efficient use of the site, allows for roof drainage to the front and back rather than sides of the property and is the most cost efficient. 56 What is the front yard setback? •With the exception of the far west units, the front yard setback is in line with the previous homes on the site at 50 feet from the front of the unit and 42 feet from the porch. The far west units are between 38 and 30 feet due to the slope on the back of the site which may be adjusted slightly to reduce the driveway slope and turning radius. What are the total square feet of the units? •The unit sizes range from 1,300 to 1,700 square feet of finished space and are 2-to-3- bedroom units with an optional office/bedroom space off the garage level. What is the process for approval and sale of the homes? The development will include a rezoning of the site through a Planned Unit Development and replating of the lots. This process requires review by the City Planning Commission and a public hearing and final approval by the City Council. The review requires notification of property owners within 500 feet of the site and is planned for later this year. If rezoning and plating are approved, construction is expected to occur in the Spring of 2025 with homes available for sale in the fall of 2025. 57