The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2024/10/21 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA OCTOBER 21, 2024 Canceled - Economic Development Authority meeting – Community Room 6:15 p.m. City council meeting – Community Room 1.Call to order a.Roll call. b.Pledge of Allegiance. 2.Approve agenda. 3.Presentations – none. 4.Minutes a.Minutes of October 7, 2024 city council special study session 5.Consent items a.Approve city council travel for National League of Cities "City Summit" Conference 2024 b.Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival c.Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 d.Resolution authorizing proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement e.Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission f.Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations g.Temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license – MATTER 6.Public hearings – none. 7.Regular business – none. 8.Communications and announcements – none. 9.Adjournment. Following city council meeting – special study session – Community Room Discussion items 1. Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion – Wards 1, 2 and 3 2. Cashless business discussion 3. Proposed agenda topic - dog parks 4. Authority to change the scope/purpose of the statutory bodies 5. REI system kick-off 6. 2025 Social Services Request for Proposal Written reports Agenda city council and special study session meetings of October 21, 2024 Members of the public can attend St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and city council meetings in person. At regular city council meetings, members of the public may comment on any item on the agenda by attending the meeting in-person or by submitting written comments to info@stlouisparkmn.gov by noon the day of the meeting. Official minutes of meetings are available on the city website once approved. Watch St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority or regular city council meetings live at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or at www.parktv.org, or on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14/HD channel 798). Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on the city's YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the meeting’s end. City council study sessions are not broadcast. Generally, it is not council practice to receive public comment during study sessions. The council chambers are equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505. Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Minutes: 4a Unofficial minutes City council special study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Oct. 7, 2024 The meeting convened at 7:35 p.m. Council members present: Paul Baudhuin, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Yolanda Farris, Lynette Dumalag, Margaret Rog, Mayor Nadia Mohamed Council members absent: none. Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), associate planner (Ms. Champoux), community development director (Ms. Barton), economic development manager (Mr. Hunt), redevelopment administrator (Ms. Monson), planning manager (Mr. Walther) Discussion items 1. Development project process overview Ms. Monson presented the staff report. Council Member Rog asked if developers typically conduct market studies before a development project in the city. Ms. Monson stated that they do; prework takes place to make sure a development will not have empty units. Mr. Hunt added developers' lenders typically require they conduct market studies as well. Council Member Rog noted that there were community meetings held related to the Belt Line project, and now there have been changes to the development. Ms. Monson stated the site plan has not substantially changed. Council Member Rog observed that exterior items have evolved without further public input. In cases like this, she asked if there is an opportunity to reengage and update the community about project changes. Ms. Monson stated if there are changes to a project, staff engages the community, and pointed to the Wooddale Station as an example. When the concept changed, numerous public meetings were held. Council Member Rog asked if the fiscal impact report is new information. Ms. Monson stated that it is not new. Council Member Rog asked if council may review the report. Mr. Hunt clarified that the information is not formatted as a report, it is a questionnaire asking for input from departments. If there is any significant input, staff shares it with council. Council Member Rog asked at what point impacts around public safety are identified. Ms. Monson stated that the police department patrols locations of concern, and when problems City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: City council study session meeting minutes of October 7, 2024 are solved with redevelopment to help correct a problem, calls for service at that location are reduced. Council Member Rog asked if the impact reports pertain to each individual development. Ms. Monson stated yes. Council Member Rog asked if public art is included. Mr. Walther stated public art is generally included when a developer is not meeting their planting requirements for landscaping or cannot provide enough trees, and is usually negotiated. Council Member Rog asked if the housing authority is ever involved. Ms. Barton stated they are involved only if there are project-based vouchers. Council Member Rog asked how square footage is certified and if a developer builds what they say they will build in every case. Mr. Walther explained the assessing department measures every inch of a building after construction to assess taxes. Ms. Barton added under the construction plan, the inspections verify the development is built to the plan requirements. Council Member Dumalag asked if there is a cap on the number of extensions with a development. Mr. Hunt stated there is not. Council Member Baudhuin asked if square footage is actually lower in a development unit, but it is marketed as higher, does the city have any regulation in place for recourse. Ms. Barton stated the city has no mechanism for regulation but added the development plan would present the details of the square footage, verified by city assessors. If there were still a discrepancy, this may be a civil matter. Council Member Dumalag stated development plans are continuously reviewed and verified during the construction process. Council Member Budd asked if projects have ever failed to meet the 60 day deadline. Mr. Walther stated that the city has always met the required deadlines during his 18 years with the city. Council Member Rog asked how a development such as Via Sol gets to a place where approval is denied and what can be learned from that experience. Ms. Barton stated Via Sol was unique from the beginning and the developer was not as experienced as others, but the city wanted to help him become successful. As the project moved forward, the city and developer tried to work together. She pointed out that it was not a complete failure and there have been some improvements. She noted that communication between council and staff and addressing concerns is important. She also noted that during her time at the city, staff have completed reference checks on developers to be certain they are capable of completing projects. Council Member Brausen asked how the city is staffed for development projects. Mr. Walther stated there are three planners, a zoning administrator, and at times, an intern. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Title: City council study session meeting minutes of October 7, 2024 Council Member Brausen asked when the presentation they were viewing during the discussion item would become available to council members. Ms. Monson stated it would be published for the public on the city website following the study session. 2. Cannabis zoning ordinance Ms. Champoux presented the staff report. Council Member Dumalag asked if there are limitations in establishment size. Ms. Champoux stated she believes there are regulations in statute on the size of plant canopy but not on the size of the facility for several cannabis business licenses. Council Member Baudhuin asked if the terms dispensary and retailer are essentially the same. Ms. Champoux stated that they have the same meaning. Council Member Bauduin asked if there will be education around these terms, especially with some stigma around cannabis use, noting he would like to see education take place. He asked what happens if the city takes no action before January 1, 2025. Mr. Walther stated January 1 is not of major concern, as the state has moved the deadline to mid-2025. He added the city would like to present some ground rules to residents so they can be prepared for what is coming. He stated they also want to get registrations in order while the state will handle licensing. Council Member Rog asked to discuss hours of operation. Ms. Champoux stated the new legislation does not permit retailers to operate between the hours of 2 a.m. – 8 a.m. The state statute also allows the city to set additional restrictions such as limiting sales to Monday through Saturday and prohibiting hours of operation between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. as well as from 9 p.m. - 2 a.m. Council Member Baudhuin stated he would prefer that Sunday should not have more restrictive hours of operation, adding that seems to be outdated. Council Member Rog stated more consideration is warranted on hours of operation restrictions for cannabis versus restrictions on liquor and she would like more discussion in this area. Ms. Keller confirmed that staff will present options for future council consideration. Council Member Rog asked about the buffer zone differences between liquor stores and schools and cannabis retailers and schools (1000-foot buffer for cannabis and 300-foot buffer for liquor stores). Mr. Walther stated last time council reviewed the proposed buffer zone from schools, they wanted to look at a larger buffer, but noted the topic can be revisited. Council Member Rog stated both liquor and cannabis buffer zone requirements should be parallel. She added concerns that part of Walker Lake would be excluded. Council Member Budd noted that racial equity was addressed well in the staff report. She observed there is a commitment to have follow-up metrics and she is excited to see the outcomes. She asked if daycare was incorporated in the analysis. Ms. Champoux stated that City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Title: City council study session meeting minutes of October 7, 2024 daycare was considered and included in the conversation last year. She stated that daycares were not included in the present recommendations as they are difficult to track, making the code difficult to administer. She described how buffer zones from schools and parks are intended to limit youth who have autonomy to go to the retailers, whereas children in daycare do not necessarily have that autonomy. Council Member Budd asked if distances from other businesses are measured across city lines, for example by Knollwood near the city of Hopkins. Mr. Walther stated the code has not been applied to sites outside the city boundary . Council Member Rog asked if licenses will be issued on a first-come, first-served basis for the four retail licenses, and how would that work for someone who already has a THC-oriented business. Ms. Champoux stated there is no preference for businesses that currently operate when it comes to getting a license. She stated there is a lottery system for licenses and, if the city sets a cap for retail registrations, that will be a question to answer. Mr. Walther added the statute provides the city 30 days to conduct a zoning compliance review for cannabis business license applications meaning these would need to be reviewed administratively. The city will likely need to rely on the state’s criteria for license applications (e.g., social equity applicants) to determine the order in which retail registrations are issued, and the city would need to process them in the order they are received. Council Member Dumalag asked if microbusinesses count as retail or operations. Ms. Champoux stated it could be both, with retail as an accessory use. If it has a retail endorsement and it is only conducting retail sales on a site, then the principal use of that site would be retail. Something to note about cannabis business licenses is that they are issued to a business, not necessarily one location, so a licensed business may have several locations. For microbusinesses that are permitted to cultivate, manufacture and conduct retail sales, they may choose to conduct all these activities in one building or at separate sites. Council Member Dumalag asked what the classification would be for a retail shop, product consumed on the premises, without cultivation. Ms. Champoux stated this would not be allowed and onsite consumption is limited to locations already approved for food and beverage consumption. Council Member Brausen stated he is in favor of the proposal and the 1,000-foot buffer because the smell can potentially travel. He stated he is not in favor of limiting the number of cannabis retailers within the city and would like to create more opportunities for emerging businesses. He added statewide caps are at 150 and there are already 1800 applications submitted to the state. Of these, over 800 are racial equity applications from out-of-state entities trying to capture this market. He stated even four applications for the city will not be a quick process. Council Member Budd stated she supports both proposals and believes four is the right number. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Title: City council study session meeting minutes of October 7, 2024 Council Member Rog stated she is supportive of the proposed regulations with the exception of the 1000-foot buffer for schools and is interested in parity with the liquor establishments. She requested a discussion about hours of operation at a future date. She supports limiting the number of retail businesses with the option to increase later. Council Member Dumalag stated she supports the 1000-foot buffer, and the number of retailers could start with four. Council could revisit this conversation each year to look at increases. Council Member Baudhuin added he is supportive but does want to further discuss hours of operation. He also agrees with the limitation of retailers but would agree with a higher number than four. He stated he would like to further discuss the 1000-foot buffer. Council Member Farris added she supports both proposed regulations as written. Mayor Mohamed stated she is in favor of both proposed regulations including the 1000-foot buffer and the limit to four retailers. She thanked staff for their work on the racial equity piece as well. Ms. Keller summarized that staff direction from the city council was to prepare the ordinance with a buffer of 1,000 feet, a cap on the number of registrations at one per 12,500 population, and staff would propose limits on the hours of operation for formal council consideration. Written Reports 3. Wooddale Station Redevelopment update – Ward 2 4. 30-day pre-eviction notice city prepared form Council Member Brausen stated he supports the Wooddale Station redevelopment. Ms. Keller stated if a study session is needed on Wooddale Station, staff will need to know from council very soon. Council Member Dumalag stated she is open to having a study session on this, and Council Member Baudhuin agreed. Council Member Rog stated the pre-eviction notice form is much improved and she thanked staff for their work. She asked if there is going to be information about STEP, and noted the only resources listed were not within the city. Ms. Barton stated those outside of the city are required to be included, and then the form does refer people to the link on the city website for more resources. Council Member Baudhuin stated he would like the Human Rights Commission to review the pre-eviction notice also. Communications/meeting check-in (verbal) City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 6 Title: City council study session meeting minutes of October 7, 2024 The meeting adjourned at 9:39 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Consent agenda item: 5a Title: Approve city council travel for National League of Cities "City Summit" Conference 2024 Recommended action: Motion to approve city council’s travel to the National League of Cities conference in Tampa Bay, Florida November 12 – November 17, 2024, for the purposes of strategic networking, professional development and meetings with state elected officials. Policy consideration: None. Summary: The administrative services department coordinates travel and costs associated with attending out-of-state organizational conferences. Conference attendance and associated costs are budgeted annually, and travel by elected officials is approved by the city council prior to travel when possible and appropriate as per Resolution No. 06-007. The National League of Cities “City Summit” conference will be attended by Council Members Baudhuin, Brausen, Dumalag, Farris, Budd and Mayor Mohamed. The conference offers a full schedule of daily sessions where council members will learn from qualified presenters and have the opportunity to network with more than 2,000 fellow attendees. The conference offers a total of five days of learning, connecting, advocating and city government leadership education. Council members planned their individual attendance dates to explore unique learning paths, including mobile workshops and focused topic sessions. The total estimated cost for attendance at the 2024 NLC Congressional Cities “City Summit” Conference is $17,950.00. Financial or budget considerations: Costs are included in the 2024 budget. Review and approval of the information by council is required and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: All strategic priorities apply. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Consent agenda item: 5b Executive summary Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Recommended action: Council to approve contract with Parktacular, Inc. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to provide an annual community festival for residents, hosted by Parktacular, Inc., with city support? Summary: Parktacular, Inc., a 501(c)3 nonprofit, organizes the annual Parktacular festival for St. Louis Park residents and visitors. The multiday, weekend community festival is held each June in Wolfe Park, 3700 Monterey Drive, and includes a parade, concert and other events. The city’s current five-year contract with Parktacular, Inc., expires Oct. 31, 2024. City staff and Parktacular representatives, with review and approval of the city attorney, have agreed on a revised five-year contract to take effect Nov. 1, 2024. Financial or budget considerations: The city will contribute $10,000 annually to Parktacular, Inc. for expenses associated with the festival, along with other in-kind services outlined in the contract. The annual cash outlay and in-kind services are included in the city’s annual budget. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Contract with Parktacular, Inc. Prepared by: Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator Mikayla Beuch, recreation supervisor Reviewed by: Jason T. West, parks and recreation director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Page 1 of 8 Community Festival Contract This contract constitutes the acknowledgement of a working relationship, dated November 1, 2024, between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK (“City”) and PARKTACULAR, INC. (“Parktacular”). This document is designed to regulate and manage the affairs of the annual St. Louis Park community festival. 1.Purpose of festival. The mission of Parktacular is to provide an event that brings together local businesses and citizens of all ages to encourage a spirit of pride, a sense of community and an atmosphere of festival for all St. Louis Park residents. 2. Intent. The operation of the community festival shall be managed in a relationship between Parktacular, and the city as specified in this document. 3.Term. This agreement shall be for a term of five (5) years commencing November 1, 2024, and terminating October 31, 2029. Any modification or amendment to this contract shall require a written agreement signed by both parties. 4.Parktacular corporate structure. Parktacular acknowledges and represents the following as to its corporate operations: 4.1. Incorporation. Parktacular, Inc. is a Minnesota non-profit corporation, incorporated under and pursuant to the Minnesota non-profit corporation act. 4.2. Board and committees. The Board of Directors has no less than three and no more than nine positions. Director positions include President, Vice President, Treasurer, Secretary, Marketing and up to six at-large positions. Directors are elected at an annual meeting to serve a term of three years. All committees are approved by the Board of Directors. These generally include Finance, Administration, Marketing, Entertainment/Food, Parade, Parktacular Expo, Kidtacular, Ambassadors and Bylaws. 4.3. City liaison. The city provides a staff liaison to Parktacular who is not a voting board member. 5. Insurance requirements. 5.1. Parktacular, at its expense, shall procure and maintain in force for the duration of this contract the following minimum insurance coverage: A.General Liability. Parktacular agrees to maintain commercial general liability insurance in a minimum amount of $1,000,000 per occurrence; $2,000,000 annual aggregate. The policy shall cover liability arising from premises, operations, personal injury, advertising injury, and City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 2 Page 2 of 8 contractually assumed liability. The city shall be endorsed as an additional insured. B. Automobile Liability. If Parktacular operates a motor vehicle in performing the Services under this contract, Parktacular shall maintain commercial automobile liability insurance, including owned, hired, and non-owned automobiles, with a minimum liability limit of $1,000,000 combined single limit. 5.2. Parktacular shall, prior to commencing the services, deliver to the city’s liaison a Certificate of Insurance annually as evidence that the above coverages are in full force and effect. 5.3. The insurance requirements may be met through any combination of primary and umbrella/excess insurance. 5.4. Parktacular policies shall be the primary insurance to any other valid and collectible insurance available to the city with respect to any claim arising out of Parktacular’s performance under this contract. 5.5. Parktacular’s policies and Certificate of Insurance shall contain a provision that coverage afforded under the policies shall not be cancelled without at least thirty (30) days advanced written notice to the city. 6. Financial. The Parktacular fiscal year operates from August 1 through July 31. The financial and all committee accounts are managed under the direction of the board and the Parktacular treasurer. All fundraising, financial transactions and the fiscal operation of the festival are the responsibility of Parktacular and are independent of the City of St. Louis Park. 7. City of St. Louis Park Support. The city, in a relationship with Parktacular, will provide the following festival support on an annual basis: 7.1. Event Location. The city will work with Parktacular to locate property for the operation of the festival. The city will coordinate pre-event organization meetings and facilitate on-site set-up. 7.2. Financial. The city will provide $10,000 to be applied towards entertainment, portable toilet fees or other expenses needed for operations of the event. 7.3. Staff. The city will provide adequate staff to support a safe and successful event, which may include park maintenance staff, police and liaison. Park Maintenance Support. The city will provide weekday general or regular maintenance support for the Parktacular event. This includes general facility appearance, equipment delivery, pre-event planning and regular scheduled weekday responsibilities at the event location. The city will also provide one or two maintenance staff personnel for a period of up to 16 total hours (minimum of two-hour shifts) during the event at no charge. Hours will be determined by city staff. Every effort will be made to use seasonal staff and/or full-time staff which are not on overtime. This is not always possible and therefore overtime personnel may be needed if requested by Parktacular. Parktacular will need to City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 3 Page 3 of 8 outline the responsibilities and timelines for staff requested. Maintenance staff support will require an outline of job responsibilities which needs to be submitted to the city liaison. Liaison. The city will provide a staff person as a liaison to Parktacular. All communication for the festival coordination is expected to flow through the city liaison. The liaison will provide support in the following areas: • Attend six to eight board meetings annually. • Organize city and Parktacular joint meetings (i.e. parade, neighborhood, carnival, etc.). • Assist in organizing event information for Parks & Recreation activity catalog and city newsletter. • Direct information requests to appropriate Parktacular member. • Assist in organizing festival information for city website and assist with link to Parktacular website. • Schedule installation of marketing banners, at city limit signs. • Provide direct communication link between city and Parktacular. • Implement facility and equipment need requests, for city owned items. • Organize notification mailings to residents impacted by events of Parktacular. • Maintain a current Board of Directors roster. • Submit maintenance requests to Parks Superintendent. • Review on-site volunteer work schedules. • Review duties and process requests for maintenance staff. • Coordinate the closure of streets for the festival parade. 7.4. Facility and Equipment Use. The city will provide facility and equipment use on the Rec Center campus for most activities deemed appropriate for the event. Facility requests must be submitted to the staff liaison by late August of the previous year to avoid any conflicts in scheduling. Any damage caused to city equipment used or operated by Parktacular volunteers will be the responsibility of Parktacular. 7.5. Storage. The city will provide a general storage area with access for ambassador and festival equipment. 8. Volunteer Staff. Parktacular is responsible for scheduling, training and implementing volunteer on-site representatives and work groups for the festival. The responsibilities include on-site coordination for all pre-event set-up, event set-up and post event teardown. All new or returning volunteers and staff, who are 18 years and older, and are working with youth or youth programs, must complete a criminal background check annually. Board and Committee members, who are 18 years and older, and are working with youth or youth programs must complete a criminal background check every other year. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 4 Page 4 of 8 The city will provide the background check form and will process. Any incurred fees from processing a Minnesota background check will be the responsibility of Parktacular. 9. Third Party Contracts. Except as set forth herein, any and all contracts with vendors or other third parties necessary to produce and operate the festival are the sole responsibility of Parktacular. All vendors must be approved by the governing health inspector and have the appropriate licenses needed to operate and serve food items in the City of St. Louis Park. All food vendors must be approved for a city mobile food vendor permit and utilize compostable items per the city ordinance. Parktacular and/or its vendors are responsible for all fees associated with inspections and appropriate licensing and permits. Food vendors are responsible for set-up, storage, operation, waste, power needs, and clean-up and tear down at each specific location. The city will work with Parktacular to determine food service locations on site during the festival. 10. Parktacular timelines and schedule. 10.1. Organization timeline. The festival timeline will be set by the Parktacular Board of Directors. Items listed below are time sensitive: • July: set date for following year’s event. • August: submit preliminary facility needs requests. • December: provide marketing information for the Parks & Recreation activity catalog. • May: submit city maintenance and staffing requests. 10.2. Event Schedules. The schedule for the annual festival will be a minimum of one day and not exceed five days. The festival will generally be scheduled on Father’s Day weekend, usually the third week and/or weekend of June. 11. Marketing. The marketing plan should include but not be limited to: PARKTACULAR • Design, develop and print and/or publish all marketing materials. • Responsible for all marketing and general mailing expenses. • Maintain and publish phone and e-mail contacts for all aspects of the Parktacular festival. • Maintain Parktacular website. • Provide schedule on website • Print and sell festival buttons. • Write and submit all press releases. • Purchase advertising. • Update event banners. • Be on site at all times during festival for information purposes. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 5 Page 5 of 8 CITY • Organize and fund one postcard mailing and targeted electronic communication to notify affected residents concerning parade routes, road closures and general event disruptions. • Promote Parktacular festival in the Parks and Recreation activity catalog. • Promote Parktacular festival on the city website including a link to the Parktacular website. • Promote Parktacular festival activities as appropriate on city social media accounts. • Promote Parktacular festival on electronic marketing screens throughout the city. • Promote Parktacular festival in the city newsletter with a mention/ad in Park Perspective, if space is available. • Hang Parktacular festival banners provided by Parktacular, at city limits signs, in accordance with city ordinances. • Provide ParkTV live truck and staff for coverage of the parade, provided staff are available. 12. Festival Operations. Parktacular festival includes multiple events, such as concerts, business expo, kid’s activities, rides or attractions and other activities and events. The following is a list of conditions for the operation of the festival: PARKTACULAR • Parktacular is responsible for selecting and contracting with reputable event, activity and entertainment operations. • Contractors must provide statement of insurance and list the City of St. Louis Park and Parktacular as additional insured on the policy. • Parktacular is responsible for inspections, permits and fees associated with the operation of the festival on city property. • Parktacular is responsible for all power needs associated with the operation of the festival, in excess to that provided from city. • Parktacular will be responsible for all utility locates through Gopher State One Call. • Parktacular will work with city staff on entire festival operation area including specific attractions and booth locations. • Parktacular will be responsible for any and all repair damage needed to restore asphalt, irrigation, turf, sidewalk, curb, concrete, trees, etc. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 6 Page 6 of 8 CITY • City must approve any and all locations. • City must approve the number of days and hours of operation. • City must approve the music and noise levels. • City will provide city owned barricades needed to identify festival space, within reason and when available. This does not include rental of additional barricades. • City may or may not approve overnight accommodation location for contracted activities staff. When approved, the contractor will be fully and financially responsible for conduct and any expense associated with use of city property for overnight accommodations. This includes returning the site to its original condition upon exiting the site. 13. Parade Route. Parktacular will annually operate a parade on a route agreed upon by both Parktacular and the city. Responsibilities for parade implementation include: PARKTACULAR • Attend organization meetings. • Approve route. • Organize and advertise parade. • Lay out staging area. • Lay out breakdown area. • Recruit and supervise parade volunteers. • Direct the parade. • Attend neighborhood meetings. • Provide parade coordinator’s phone number, address and email address. • Set fees for parade participation. • Contact ParkTV for coverage and provide an area for the ParkTV truck to park at the parade. • Clean up parade route at conclusion. • Obtain permits for all facilities needed to implement parade. • Design and implement parade insurance waiver requirements for local parade participants. CITY • Schedule organization meetings. • Approve route and staging/breakdown areas. • City liaison will coordinate the closure of streets impacted by parade route. • Notify Hennepin County for permit. • Notify residents impacted by route and schedule neighborhood meeting, if necessary. • Sign and barricade route. • Provide Public Safety support at key intersections. • Provide traffic control as needed. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 7 Page 7 of 8 • Provide Street Department support as needed. • Provide Parks Department support as needed. • Trim trees on parade route. • Assist in organizing neighborhood meetings. • Pick up parade route city owned barricades and signs. • Sweep and clean parade route streets one day in advance of parade. • Host wrap-up meeting (if necessary). 14. Parade Unit Trailer. Parktacular is responsible for ownership, maintenance, decoration and insurance of the parade unit trailer. The City of St. Louis Park may provide, upon request, a vehicle/driver to pull the parade unit trailer for Parktacular festival use at the expense of Parktacular. However, the majority of towing responsibility shall be with the Parktacular festival. 15. Event marketing merchandise. The event merchandise aka pin-on buttons, design, supplier, distribution and sale are at the sole discretion of the Parktacular Board and Committee. The Board and Committee may also choose not to design and sell an event button. Parktacular’s Board or Committee may sell Parktacular sponsored merchandise at city locations following approval from the liaison. 16. Ambassador. The ambassador program is the sole responsibility of Parktacular. The ambassador program may request facility reservations through Parktacular. 17. Security. The general security of the Parktacular festival is the responsibility of Parktacular. The St. Louis Park police and fire departments are available for emergencies but will not provide general 24-hour security services. 18. Permits & Licenses. Parktacular will work with City representatives for the scheduling of inspections and all fees associated with the permits and licenses needed to operate the Parktacular festival. 19. Public Health. Public health responsibilities during the operation of the Parktacular festival are assigned as follows: PARKTACULAR • Provide and fund appropriate number of portable toilets for festival. • Provide and fund appropriate number of hand-washing stations for the festival. • Provide volunteer work groups to service appropriate number of waste receptacles for the festival. • Meet with governing health inspector to approve plans for food service and public health concerns. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 8 Page 8 of 8 CITY • Provide option for use of city contractor for portable toilets, hand washing stations and waste disposal. • Work with Parktacular to determine number of portable toilets, hand washing stations and waste receptacles needed for the festival. • Order units requested by Parktacular from city contractor (if needed). • Determine location for toilets, hand washing units, waste receptacles and dumpster. • Facilitate delivery and pick-up of all portable toilets and hand washing stations. • Provide large dumpster for waste disposal, if needed. • Invoice Parktacular if portable toilets and hand washing stations are rented through city contractor. 20 Conflict Resolution This document has been written to act as an instrument to clarify the relationship between Parktacular and the city. Once the document is signed and approved by both entities the following process will be required to make changes to the agreement: • Request for change must be submitted in writing to both the Recreation Superintendent and the President of Parktacular; and • Representatives from both entities will schedule to meet and discuss potential adjustments; and • If both entities agree to changes, document is adjusted and approved by the city and Parktacular. Reviewed for parks and recreation: Parktacular, Inc. Jason T. West, director of parks and recreation Maggie Myers, president Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council Oct. 21, 2024 Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Title: Approve contract between city and Parktacular, Inc. for annual community festival Page 9 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Consent agenda item: 5c Executive summary Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolutions setting the 2025 Special Service Districts 1 - 6 budgets and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to approve Special Service Districts 1 - 6 budgets and property owner service charges? Summary: On Oct. 7, 2024, a public hearing was held where staff presented information relating to the proposed 2025 budgets and service charges. The public hearing was opened for public input, none was provided, and the public hearing was closed. The 2025 proposed budgets and service charges have been adjusted to include a 2.14% increase in Special Service Districts (SSD) 1 – 4 and no increase in SSDs 5 – 6 due to adequate fund balances. Staff have provided public notice and a direct mailing to property owners in each district regarding the proposed 2025 budget and service charges. The proposed 2025 budget and services charges, along with maps showing the locations of each district, are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: The city owns property in several SSDs and will incur service charge costs for those properties. The service charge costs incurred are as follows: parks maintenance budget incurs $30,537 in SSD 1; public works ops budget incurs $56 in SSD 2 and $851 in SSD 4; EDA/TIF admin budget incurs $1,770 in SSD 6. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolutions Attachments A)SSD 1 – 6 budgets B)SSD 1 – 6 service charges C) SSD 1 – 6 streetscape maps Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Page 2 Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Discussion Background: History In 1996, council approved a resolution authorizing Special Service District (SSD) 1. Since then, five additional service districts have been set up within the city (SSDs 1-4 are along Excelsior Boulevard, SSD 5 is along Park Place Boulevard near West End, and SSD 6 is along W. 36th Street near Hoiggard Village). City staff provides management services for the service districts. Budget and service charge overview Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The service charges are used to fund the maintenance activities in each district. The notice of this public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 19 and Oct. 3, 2024. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within each district. A summary of proposed 2025 budget and service charges are below: • SSD 1: budget and service charges proposed at $114,398; an increase of 2.14%. • SSD 2: budget and service charges proposed at $50,892; an increase of 2.14%. • SSD 3: budget and service charges proposed at $55,333; an increase of 2.14%. • SSD 4: budget and service charges proposed at $28,885; an increase of 2.14%. • SSD 5: budget and service charges proposed at $34,287; no increase due to adequate fund reserves to meet budgeted expenses. • SSD 6: budget proposed at $27,400 and service charges proposed at $19,320. No increase in budget or service charges due to adequate fund reserves to meet budgeted expenses. Proposed 2025 budget and service charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following: • 2025 budget and service charges for each district. • In SSD 1: an annual contribution of $1,993 from Parkshores Senior Campus, LLC, in recognition of the benefits received as a residential property located within the service district. The proposed resolutions were reviewed by city attorney, Soren Mattick. Present considerations: The Special Service Districts are a benefit to the businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: • In November 2024, the city certifies the 2025 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Page 3 Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Resolution No. 24-___ 2025 Budget & Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2067-96, the city council created Special Service District No. 1 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 16-130, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2026 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 16-130, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 16-130, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the county by December 1, 2024. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2025 Budget for Special Service District No. 1 of $114,398 is hereby approved. 2. The authorized 2025 service charge for Special Service District No. 1 is $114,398 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. 3. An annual contribution of $1,933 will be accepted from Parkshores Senior Campus, LLC, in recognition of the benefits received as a residential property located within the service district. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Page 4 Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Resolution No. 24-___ 2025 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2093-97, the city council created Special Service District No. 2 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 18-147, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2028 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 18-147, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 18-147, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the county by December 1, 2024. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2025 Budget for Special Service District No. 2 of $50,892 is hereby approved. 2. The authorized 2025 service charge for Special Service District No. 1 is $50,892 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Page 5 Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Resolution No. 24-___ 2025 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 3 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2224-02, the city council created Special Service District No. 3 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 12-149, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2032 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 12-149, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 12-149, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the county by December 1, 2024. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2025 budget for Special Service District No. 3 of $55,333 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 3 property owners. 2. The authorized 2025 service charge for Special Service District No. 3 is $55,333 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Page 6 Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Resolution No. 24-___ 2025 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2298-05, the city council created Special Service District No. 4 (the “district”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 15-148, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2025 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 2 of Resolution No. 15-148, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 15-148, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the county by December 1, 2024. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2025 budget for Special Service District No. 4 of $28,885 is hereby approved. 2. The authorized 2025 service charge for Special Service District No. 4 is $28,885 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Page 7 Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Resolution No. 24-____ 2025 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2371-09, the city council created Special Service District No. 5 (the "District"). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment "B" attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 19-132, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2029 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 19-132, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 19-132, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the county by December 1, 2024. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2025 Budget for Special Service District No. 5 of $34,287 is hereby approved. 2. The authorized 2025 service charge for Special Service District No. 5 is $34,287 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment "B" attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Page 8 Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1 - 6 Resolution No. 24-____ 2025 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2374-09, the city council created Special Service District No. 6 (the "District"). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment "B" attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 19-133, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2029 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 19-133, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 19-133, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the county by December 1, 2024. Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2025 Budget for Special Service District No. 6 of $27,400 is hereby approved. 2. The authorized 2025 service charge for Special Service District No. 6 is $19,320 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment "B" attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #1 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2025 Adopted Budget 2024 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 255$ 250$ 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 536$ 525$ 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 6,327$ 6,195$ 6303 - OTHER 322$ 315$ 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 2,681$ 2,625$ 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 4,826$ 4,725$ 6550 - Civil 750 - Civil 161$ 158$ 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - snow removal 772 - SSD - snow removal 46,114$ 45,150$ 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,072$ 1,050$ 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,217$ 3,150$ 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 8,579$ 8,400$ 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 33,245$ 32,550$ 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES 107$ 105$ 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 144$ 141$ 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 4,290$ 4,200$ 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,520$ 2,468$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 114,398$ 112,006$ SSD#1 Budget City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 9 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #2 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2025 Adopted Budget 2024 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 218$ 213$ 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 214$ 210$ 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 3,217$ 3,150$ 6303 - OTHER 1,072$ 1,050$ 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 531$ 520$ 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,145$ 2,100$ 6550 - Civil 750 - Civil -$ 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD Site Maintenance 773 - SSD Site Maintenance -$ 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 858$ 840$ 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 4,290$ 4,200$ 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 10,081$ 9,870$ 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 24,666$ 24,150$ 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 61$ 60$ 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,072$ 1,050$ 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,467$ 2,415$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 50,892$ 49,828$ SSD#2 Budget City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 10 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #3 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2025 Adopted Budget 2024 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 461$ 451$ 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 214$ 210$ 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 3,753$ 3,675$ 6303 - OTHER 1,609$ 1,575$ 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 536$ 525$ 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,681$ 2,625$ 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - snow removal 772 - SSD - snow removal 19,304$ 18,900$ 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 643$ 630$ 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,681$ 2,625$ 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 7,507$ 7,350$ 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 12,869$ 12,600$ 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 71$ 70$ 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,823$ 1,785$ 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,180$ 1,155$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 55,333$ 54,176$ SSD #3 Budget City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 11 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #4 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2025 Adopted Budget 2024 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 162$ 159$ 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 214$ 210$ 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,145$ 2,100$ 6303 - OTHER 536$ 525$ 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 536$ 525$ 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 1,341$ 1,313$ 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 536$ 525$ 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,753$ 3,675$ 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 3,217$ 3,150$ 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 11,797$ 11,550$ 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES 107$ 105$ 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 35$ 35$ 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,930$ 1,890$ 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,574$ 2,520$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,885$ 28,281$ SSD #4 Budget City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 12 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #5 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2025 Adopted Budget 2024 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 233$ 233$ 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 210$ 210$ 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 4,200$ 4,200$ 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 1,050$ 1,050$ 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 1,575$ 1,575$ 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,680$ 1,680$ 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,150$ 3,150$ 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 3,150$ 3,150$ 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 15,855$ 15,855$ 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 34$ 34$ 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,575$ 1,575$ 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,575$ 1,575$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 34,287$ 34,287$ SSD #5 Budget City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 13 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #6 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2025 Adopted Budget 2024 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 217$ 217$ 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 500$ 500$ 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 5,000$ 5,000$ 6303 - OTHER 1,000$ 1,000$ 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,500$ 2,500$ 6630 - SSD Site Maintenance 773 - SSD Site Maintenance 500$ 500$ 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,500$ 2,500$ 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 11,000$ 11,000$ 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES 150$ 150$ 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 33$ 33$ 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 3,000$ 3,000$ 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,000$ 1,000$ TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,400$ 27,400$ SSD #6 Budget City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 14 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #1 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2025 Service Charges PROPOSED Actual 2025 2024 LINE PID SERVICE SERVICE NO.NO.OWNER BUSINESS CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-33-0019 3601 Park Center Boulevard Bel Verge LLC Bel Verge LLC $3,897 $3,849 2 06-028-24-33-0015 3601 State Hwy No 100 South Target Corporation T-0260 Target Corporation $12,278 $12,077 3 06-028-24-34-0022 3700 Monterey Drive City of St. Louis Park City of St. Louis Park $30,537 $29,728 4 06-028-24-33-0014 3777 Park Center Boulevard Bermer Corp Lund Food Holdings $12,601 $12,353 6 07-028-24-22-0031 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $8,428 $8,145 7 07-028-24-22-0035 3900 Park Nicollet Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $6,562 $6,421 8 07-028-24-21-0004 4916 Excelsior Boulevard Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Health Services $1,918 $1,904 9 07-028-24-21-0005 4920 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Medical Center Park Nicollet Health Services $556 $546 10 07-028-24-21-0006 4950 Excelsior Boulevard Zip Printing Zip Printing $641 $634 11 07-028-24-21-0512 4951 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $1,736 $1,712 12 07-028-24-21-0513 4959 Excelsior Boulevard 4959 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $1,543 $1,508 13 07-028-24-22-0023 4961 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $717 $704 14 07-028-24-22-0024 4995 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $953 $933 15 07-028-24-22-0032 5000 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $679 $670 16 07-028-24-22-0025 5001 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $678 $665 17 07-028-24-22-0033 5050 Excelsior Boulevard Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Health Services $4,010 $3,928 18 07-028-24-22-0034 5100 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $1,720 $1,678 19 07-028-24-22-0037 5200 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Place Ltd Liability Co.Frauenshuh Co.$1,918 $1,890 20 07-028-24-22-0026 5201 Excelsior Boulevard 5001 Excelsior Blvd LLC Miracle Mile $9,836 $9,669 21 07-028-24-22-0036 5300 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Place LTD Liability Co Frauenshuh Co.$6,930 $6,827 22 07-028-24-22-0004 5400 Auto Club Way AAA AAA Minneapolis $6,261 $6,165 Service charge total $114,398 $112,005 Notes: 1)The proposed 2025 service charges total is $114,398. 3)The proposed 2025 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. ADDRESS City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 15 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #2 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2025 Service Charges PROPOSED Actual 2025 2024 LINE SERVICE SERVICE NO.PID NO.OWNER Business name CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-41-0075 3900 Excelsior Blvd MFREVF III - Ellipse, LLC MFREVF III - Ellipse LLC $8,141 $7,970 2 06-028-24-41-0077 3901 Excelsior Blvd Alberto Properties LLP Alberto Properties LLP $2,405 $2,355 3 06-028-24-41-0076 3924 Excelsior Blvd MFREVF III - Ellipse, LLC MFREVF III - Ellipse LLC $2,926 $2,865 4 06-028-24-41-0068 3925 Excelsior Blvd Patricia J Fitzgerald A & A Agency Inc $943 $924 6 06-028-24-41-0067 3929 Excelsior Blvd City of St. Louis Park City of St Louis Park $56 $55 7 06-028-24-41-0014 3939 Excelsior Blvd Sara Son LLC Sara Son LLC $1,369 $1,341 8 06-028-24-41-0070 3947 Excelsior Blvd Wallack Properties LLC Wallack Properties LLC $2,302 $2,254 9 06-028-24-41-0008 4100 Excelsior Blvd Sela Roofing & Remodeling Sela Roofing & Remodeling $1,667 $1,632 10 06-028-24-41-0009 4120 Excelsior Blvd Altus Business Development Properties Altus Business Development Properties $1,629 $1,595 11 06-028-24-44-0001 4140 Excelsior Blvd Ridgecrest St. Louis Park I LLC Tierra Encantada $2,818 $2,759 12 06-028-24-44-0176 4170 Excelsior Blvd 4150 Excelsior Blvd Partnership Rack Attack $2,141 $2,096 13 06-028-24-44-0175 4200 Excelsior Blvd Stranik Real Estate LLC DBA Midas St. Paul $1,823 $1,785 14 06-028-24-44-0173 4201 Excelsior Blvd AMF Properties LLC AMF Properties LLC/Life Medical $2,736 $2,679 15 06-028-24-44-0088 4221 Excelsior Blvd Prima Investments LLC Prima Investments LLC $385 $377 16 06-028-24-43-0017 4300 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $799 $782 17 06-028-24-43-0020 4301 Excelsior Blvd S & S Investments S & S Investments $1,682 $1,647 18 06-028-24-43-0018 4306 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $612 $599 19 06-028-24-43-0019 4308 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $816 $799 20 06-028-24-43-0021 4317 Excelsior Blvd 4317 Holdings LLC DWELL 44 $1,016 $995 21 06-028-24-43-0186 4320 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments LLC Poobah Investments LLC $2,509 $2,456 22 06-028-24-43-0091 4331 Excelsior Blvd Johnson0503 LLC Bell Nelson Furniture $1,382 $1,353 23 06-028-24-43-0392 4400 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bancshares Inc Bridgewater Bank $5,774 $5,653 24 06-028-24-43-0040 4409 Excelsior Blvd Samfar Real Estate Inc Samfar Real Estate Inc $963 $943 25 06-028-24-43-0041 4415 Excelsior Blvd Automotive Accessories LLC Automotive Accessories LLC $794 $777 26 06-028-24-43-0042 4419 Excelsior Blvd Celine Properties LLC Celine Properties LLC $1,748 $1,711 27 06-028-24-43-0391 4450 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bank Bridgewater Bank $1,456 $1,426 Service charge total $50,892 $49,828 Notes: 1)The proposed 2025 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. 2)All services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. ADDRESS City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 16 Attachment B Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #3 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2025 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2025 2024 LINE NO.PID No.Address Business Owner Service Charge Service Charge 1 06-028-24-43-0191 4500 Exc Blvd CS McCrossan Inc Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $4,743 $4,672 2 07-028-24-12-0047 4501 Exc Blvd S & D Cleaners Laurel Properties LLC $1,280 $1,249 3 07-028-24-12-0048 4509 Exc Blvd Lang Nelson Office Park Boulevard LLP $2,277 $2,223 4 06-028-24-43-0192 4590 Exc Blvd CS McCrossan Inc Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $974 $960 6 07-028-24-12-0049 4601 Exc Blvd Park Blvd Office Bldg Park Boulevard LLP $3,185 $3,117 7 07-028-24-12-0050 4611 Exc Blvd Dilly Lilly 4611 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,536 $1,504 8 07-028-24-12-0051 4615 Exc Blvd Judith McGrann & Friends Pie in the Sky Properties, LLC $1,325 $1,297 9 07-028-24-12-0052 4617 Exc Blvd Flower Fair 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,728 $1,691 10 07-028-24-12-0175 4630 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand Apts LLC $7,856 $7,683 11 07-028-24-21-0009 4631 Exc Blvd F45 Training 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,762 $1,725 12 07-028-24-21-0011 4701 Exc Blvd Steve's Park Amoco Mason Properties LLC $2,839 $2,771 13 07-028-24-21-0012 4725 Exc Blvd Excelsior Office Bldg Excelsior Investments LLC $3,697 $3,614 14 07-028-24-21-0256 4730 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand Apts LLC $9,168 $8,969 15 07-028-24-21-0514 4800 Exc Blvd Fresh Thyme Grocery 4800 Excelsior Apts $5,448 $5,351 16 07-028-24-21-0252 4801 Exc Blvd Loffhagen Insurance Bird Dog Properties LLC $1,747 $1,710 17 07-028-24-21-0015 4811 Exc Blvd Latitudes/Laundramat Fine Brothers $1,591 $1,555 18 07-028-24-21-0016 4821 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Poperties LLC $864 $846 19 07-028-24-21-0017 4825 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Poperties LLC $861 $843 20 07-028-24-21-0031 4901 Exc Blvd Margolis Law Firm DMM Holdings $897 $876 21 07-028-24-21-0032 4907 Exc Blvd Allstate 4907 Excelsior LLC $778 $760 22 07-028-24-21-0033 4911 Exc Blvd Sherwin-Williams MKT Property LLC $777 $760 Service charge total $55,333 $54,176 Notes: 1)The proposed 2025 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 17 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #4 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2025 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2025 2024 PAR Service Service NO.PID #Owner Business Charge Charge 1 21-117-21-24-0019 5600 Excelsior Blvd Coco Investments Finished Basement Company $1,080 $1,058 2 21-117-21-24-0202 5608 Excelsior Blvd Helmut Mauer Auto Surf Café $819 $802 3 21-117-21-24-0141 5707 Excelsior Blvd Len Paul/Gene Pretty Good LLC c/o New Concepts Management Group New Concepts Mgt Group $1,099 $1,076 4 21-117-21-24-0193 5717 Excelsior Blvd LMC INC LMC Inc.$950 $930 5 21-117-21-24-0040 5720 Excelsior Blvd Holiday Stationstores Inc Holiday Stationstores, Inc.$1,186 $1,161 6 21-117-21-24-0161 5801 Excelsior Blvd Premier RE, LLC Premier RE LLC $546 $535 7 21-117-21-24-0066 5804 Excelsior Blvd Lelich Properties LLC Lelich Properties LLC $671 $657 8 21-117-21-24-0210 5809 Excelsior Blvd C.B.S. Real Est Ptnr II LLP C B S Real Est Ptrn II LLP $537 $526 9 21-117-21-24-0067 5810 Excelsior Blvd 5812 Excelsior Blvd Co LLC 5812 Excelsior Blvd Co LLC $770 $754 11 21-117-21-24-0185 5825 Excelsior Blvd Kil-Ben Excelsior, LLC Kil-Ben Excelsior LLC $1,414 $1,384 12 21-117-21-24-0083 5900 Excelsior Blvd Realty Income Properties3, LLC Realty Income Props 3 LLC $959 $939 13 21-117-21-23-0156 5916 Excelsior Blvd Rackner & Rackner Rackner and Rackner/Bunny's $1,072 $1,050 14 21-117-21-23-0010 5922 Excelsior Blvd 5922 Building LLC Frederick & Rosen Ltd $197 $193 15 21-117-21-24-0195 5925 Excelsior Blvd DYS Properties Suntide Commercial Realty $1,466 $1,435 16 21-117-21-23-0011 5930 Excelsior Blvd Leonard C Riley Trust Northern Aire Pools $369 $361 17 21-117-21-23-0097 6001 Excelsior Blvd Sew What Corporation The Wicker Shop $522 $511 18 21-117-21-23-0127 6002 Excelsior Blvd Seneca Holdings LLC Fitrz Inc $589 $577 19 21-117-21-23-0128 6006 Excelsior Blvd Four Four Time LLC RRK LLC $303 $297 20 21-117-21-23-0100 6011 Excelsior Blvd Kathleen Hames Arts & Flowers $1,159 $1,135 21 21-117-21-23-0155 6100 Excelsior Blvd Lion Properties LLC ReMAXX/King Tooth $408 $399 22 21-117-21-32-0006 6111 Excelsior Blvd Excelsior 6111, LLC 6111 Excelsior LLC $1,116 $1,093 23 21-117-21-23-0130 6112 Excelsior Blvd Snyder Electric Co.Snyder Electric Co $609 $596 24 21-117-21-32-0021 6121 Excelsior Blvd Flannery Lucey Props I LLC Secured Retirement $654 $640 25 21-117-21-32-0022 6127 Excelsior Blvd TRW Capital Management Inc White Family Dentistry $441 $431 26 6200 6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd $3,095 $3,030 27 20-117-21-14-0026 6500 Excelsior Blvd Park Nicollet Health Services/Methodist Hospital Asbury Methodist Hospital $2,135 $2,091 28 20-117-21-41-0009 6600 Excelsior Blvd Park Nicollet Health Services/Methodist Hospital Methodist Hospital $3,868 $3,787 29 City Municipal Parking Lot City of St. Louis Park $851 $833 Service charge total $28,885 $28,281 Address City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 18 Attachment B **6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd Charges 2025 2024 21-117-21-32-0133 6200 Excelsior Blvd 101 TRW Capital Management Inc.Ward Law Offices LTD $180 $177 21-117-21-32-0134 6200 Excelsior Blvd 102 Charles and Janice Woodson Farmers Insurance Group $188 $184 21-117-21-32-0135 6200 Excelsior Blvd 103 KUN LI RE 1 LLC Midwest Construction $182 $178 21-117-21-32-0136 6200 Excelsior Blvd 104 DAFI Properties LLC American Family Insurance $205 $201 21-117-21-32-0137 6200 Excelsior Blvd 201 Dennis Schlutter Chiropractic Center $174 $171 21-117-21-32-0138 6200 Excelsior Blvd 202 Lois Cochrane Schlutter $184 $180 21-117-21-32-0139 6200 Excelsior Blvd 203 Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC $240 $234 21-117-21-32-0140 6200 Excelsior Blvd 204 Lois Cochrane Schlutter Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC $212 $207 21-117-21-32-0141 6250 Excelsior Blvd 101 6250 Excelsior Blvd 101 LLC Alex Trevino Law PLLC $193 $189 21-117-21-32-0142 6250 Excelsior Blvd 102 BZ Holdings LLC LGH Properties LLC $179 $175 21-117-21-32-0143 6250 Excelsior Blvd 103 Impact Massage & Bodywork LLC E.Gordon Hoar & Associates $196 $192 21-117-21-32-0144 6250 Excelsior Blvd 104 RDK Holdings LLC Nemer Fieger & Associates $177 $174 21-117-21-32-0145 6250 Excelsior Blvd 201 James D Fieger Trustee Nemer Fieger & Associates $188 $184 21-117-21-32-0146 6250 Excelsior Blvd 202 Willy Skadsberg JR Skads Travel Service, Inc.$171 $167 21-117-21-32-0147 6250 Excelsior Blvd 203 James D Fieger Trustee Nemer Fieger & Associates $249 $244 21-117-21-32-0148 6250 Excelsior Blvd 204 Excelsior Blvd Office LLC Urista Properties LLC $177 $174 Subtotal $3,095 $3,031 Notes **Denotes properties with a single street address but have sub-units that are independently owned. 1)The proposed 2025 service charge is $28,885. 2)The proposed 2025 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 19 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #5 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2025 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2025 2024 PID Address Owner Business Service Charge Service Charge 04-117-21-31-0019 1500 Park Place Blvd MLCV STLP LLC Doubletree Hotel $6,007 $6,007 30-029-24-33-0031 1600 West End Blvd MSP West End LLC Shoppes at West End $5,935 $5,935 04-117-21-34-0046 1620 Park Place Blvd PK Investment Associates LLC Roti & Leeann Chin $1,364 $1,364 04-117-21-34-0045 1650 Park Place Blvd PK Investment Associates LLC Inland Commerical $1,607 $1,607 04-117-21-34-0044 1690 Park Place Blvd Roselk LLC Arby's $1,209 $1,209 04-117-21-34-0049 1700 Park Place Blvd Costco Wholesale Corporation Fueling Station only $1,070 $1,070 30-029-24-32-0022 5320 16th St W MSP West End LLC ARC WEMPSMN001 LLC $2,395 $2,395 30-029-24-32-0026 5353 Wayzata Blvd MV Exchange & MV Exchange II LLC Park National Bank $2,467 $2,467 30-029-24-33-0011 5401 Gamble Dr BOF II MN W END OFF PK LLC Parkdale I - MEPC $4,313 $4,313 30-029-24-33-0015 5402 Parkdale Dr BOF II MN W END OFF PK LLC Parkdale II - MEPC $1,457 $1,457 04-117-21-34-0043 5600 Cedar Lake Rd PK Investment Associates LLC Office/Copy Max & Petsmart $2,777 $2,777 04-117-21-34-0050 5601 16th St W PK Investment Associates LLC Stormwater Pond $1,041 $1,041 04-117-21-31-0018 5657 Wayzata Blvd KK Corporation Park Place Restaurants $1,281 $1,281 04-117-21-34-0058 5699 16th St W PK Investment Associates LLC Five Guys $1,366 $1,366 Service charge total $34,287 $34,287 Notes: 1)The proposed 2025 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. However, there is no increase proposed for the 2025 service charges. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 20 Attachment B CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #6 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2025 Service Charges LINE Business Proposed Actual NO.2025 2024 PID Address Owner Service Charge Service Charge 1 16-117-21-34-0607 3601 Wooddale Ave Woodale Catered Lvg TowerLight Senior Living $3,344 $3,344 2 16-117-21-34-0015 5500 36th St. W.SLMB LLC SLMB LLC $429 $429 3 16-117-21-34-0355 5600 36th St W SLP Harmony Marketplace LLC SLP HARMONY MARKETPLACE LLCKAMI Inc $3,129 $3,129 4 16-117-21-34-0611 5605 36th St W 36th Street LLC 36th Street LLC $2,977 $2,977 6 16-117-21-34-0072 5701 36th St W Shirley Okrent Lerner Trust The Oliver Press $1,118 $1,118 7 16-117-21-34-0040 5708 36th St W Standal Properties Inc Standal Properties Inc.$1,770 $1,770 8 16-117-21-34-0071 5718 36th St W Shirley Okrent Lerner Trust The Oliver Press $590 $590 9 16-117-21-34-0077 5721 36th St W J Evan Properties LLC Thermetic Products $1,243 $1,243 10 16-117-21-34-0038 5724 36th St W 5724 West 36th Street LLC 5724 West 36th St LLC $590 $590 11 16-117-21-34-0046 5727 36th St W R & SA Investment LLC R & SA Investment LLC $590 $590 12 16-117-21-34-0068 5802 36th St W Standal Properties Inc Standal Properties Inc.$1,770 $1,770 13 16-117-21-31-0610 5950 36th St W City of St. Louis Park City of St Louis Park EDA $1,770 $1,770 Service charge total $19,320 $19,320 Notes: 1)The proposed 2025 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. However, no increase in service charges is propsed for 2025. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 21 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 22 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 23 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 24 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 25 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 26 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5c) Title: Resolutions approving 2025 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service Districts 1-6 Page 27 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Consent agenda item: 5d Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement Recommended action: Council approval of a fiscal year 2025 grant awarded to the St. Louis Park police department to fund a full-time DWI/Traffic Safety police officer. Policy consideration: Does council wish to authorize the acceptance of the fiscal year 2025 grant awarded to the St. Louis Park police department to fund a full-time DWI/Traffic Safety police officer? Summary: The city has been the recipient of the DWI/Traffic Safety Police Officer Grant Program since 2022. The program primarily seeks to detect and interdict impaired driving with a significant focus on dangerous driving behaviors including speeding, distracted driving and occupant protection. These are priorities that are addressed through both enforcement and education strategies. The program in 2025 funds up to $150,000 per grantee during the award period, covering salary, overtime and fringe benefits. Only activities directly associated with the DWI/Traffic safety grant program are eligible for reimbursement, with no equipment costs covered. The grant operational period coincides with the federal fiscal year of Oct. 1, 2024, to Sept. 30, 2025. This federally funded program is anticipated to be in place in the future. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Resolution Proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement Prepared by: Mikael Garland, police lieutenant Bryan Kruelle, police chief Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5d) Page 2 Title: Resolution authorizing proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement Resolution 24-___ Approving state of Minnesota Department of Public Safety grant award and agreement with the City of St. Louis Park associated with a full time DWI/Traffic Safety Officer Whereas, the city of St. Louis Park on behalf of its police department desires to enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota Department of Public Safety to fund a full time DWI/Traffic Safety Officer. The grant award agreement stipulates the DWI/Traffic Safety Officer will work primarily to detect and interdict impaired drivers as well as focusing on dangerous driving behaviors to include speeding, distracted driving and occupant protection while the grant award period is in effect, Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota as follows: 1. That the city of St. Louis Park on behalf of its police department enter into a grant agreement with the Minnesota Department of Public Safety for the DWI Officer grant during the period from October 1, 2024, through September 30, 2025. 2. Mayor Nadia Mohamed and City Manager Kim Keller, or successors, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements and amendments as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the city of St. Louis Park and to be the fiscal agent and administer the grant. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk I ® I Grant Contract Agreement Page 1 of 3 Minnesota Department of Public Safety ("State") Office of Traffic Safety 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 Grantee: St. Louis Park Police Depattment 3015 Raleigh Avenue South St. Louis Park, MN 55416-5705 Grantee's Authorized Representative: Sergeant Dennis Hagen 3015 Raleigh A venue South St. Louis Park, MN 55416-5705 (952)928-1426 dhagen(@.stlouisparlrnm.gov State's Authorized Representative: Duane Siedschlag, Impaired Driving Program Coordinator 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 1620 Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651)221-707'8 Duane.siedsch lag@state.mn. us Grant Program: 2025 NHTSA: DWI/ Traffic Safety Officer Grant Contract Agreement No.: A-OFFICR25-2025-STLOUIPD-0 15 Grant Contract Agreement Term: Effective Date: 10/01/2024 Expiration Date: 09/30/2025 Grant Contract Agreement Amount: $150,000.00Original Agreement Matching Requirement $ 0.00 Federal Funding: CFDA/ALN: 20.608 & 20.608 & 20.600 FAIN: 69A37523300001640MNA & 69A37523300001640MNA & 69A37523300004020MNO State Funding: NI A Special Conditions: None Under Minn. Stat.§ 299A.0l, Subd 2 (4) the State is empowered to enter into this grant contract agreement. Term: The creation and validity of this grant contract agreement conforms with Minn. Stat. § 16B. 98 Subdivision 5. Effective date is the date shown above or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, Subdivision 7, whichever is later. Once this grant contract agreement is fully executed, the Grantee may claim reimbursement for expenditures incurred pursuant to the Payment clause of this grant contract agreement. Reimbursements will only be made for those expenditures made according to the terms of this grant contract agreement. Expiration date is the date shown above or until all obligations have been satisfactorily fulfilled, whichever occurs first. The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will: Perform and accomplish such purposes and activities as specified herein and in the Grantee's approved 2025 NHTSA: DWI / Traffic Safety Officer Application ["Application"] which is incorporated by reference into this grant contract agreement and on file with the State at 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 620, Saint Paul, MN 55101. The Grantee shall also comply with all requirements referenced in the 2025 NHTSA: DWI / Traffic Safety Officer Guidelines and Application which includes the Tenns and Conditions and Grant Program Guidelines (https://app.dps.mn.gov/EGrants), which are incorporated by reference into this grant contract agreement. Budget Revisions: The breakdown of costs of the Grantee's Budget is contained in Exhibit A, which is attached and incorporated into this grant contract agreement. As stated in the Grantee's Application and Grant Program Guidelines, the Grantee will submit a written change request for any substitution of budget items or any deviation and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines. Requests must be approved prior to any expenditure by the Grantee. DPS Grant Contract Agreement Non-State (rev. September 2022) City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution authorizing proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement Page 3 Grant Contract Agreement Page 2 of 3 Matching Requirements: (If applicable.) As stated in the Grantee's Application, the Grantee certifies that the matching requirement will be met by the Grantee. Payment: As stated in the Grantee's Application and Grant Program Guidance, the State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services and in accordance with the Grant Program Guidelines. Payment will not be made if the Grantee has not satisfied repo11ing requirements. Certification Regarding Lobbying: (If applicable.) Grantees receiving federal funds over $100,000.00 must complete and return the Ce11ification Regarding Lobbying form provided by the State to the Grantee. 1. ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION lndivid11al certifies that jimds have been encumbered as req11ired by Minn. Stat. § I 6A. I 5. Signed: __________________ _ Date: ___________________ _ 3.STATE AGENCYSigned: __________________ _ (with delegated authority) Title: ____________________ Date: ___________________ _ Grant Contract Agreement No./ P.O. No. A-OFFICR25-2025-STLOUIPD-0 15 / 3000098273 Project No.25-03-03 2.GRANTEEThe Grantee cel'l{/ies that the appropriate person(,) have exec11ted the grant contract c1greeme11t on behal/o/tlie Grantee as required by applicable articles, b),lmrs, reso/11tions, or ordinances. Signed: __________________ _ Print Name: ------------------ Title: -------------------- Date: -------------------- Signed: ____________________ Print Name: ------------------ Title: _____________________ Date: --------------------- Signed: ____________________ Print Name: _________________ _ Distribution. DPS/FAS Title:_____________________ Grantee State's Authorized Representative Date: --------------------- DPS Grant Contract Agreement Non-State (rev. September 2022) City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution authorizing proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement Page 4 Grant Contract Agreement Page 3 of 3 DPS Grant Contract Agreement Non-State (rev. September 2022) City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution authorizing proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement Page 5 Organization: St Louis Park Police Department Budget Budget Category DWI TSO Salary & Fringe Salary for Grant Officer Total Operating Expense All costs associated beyond salary for this grant related work. Total TZD Conference Annual TZD Conference Total Total 09/23/2024 2025 DWI / Traffic Safety Officer Budget Summary State Reimbursement $150,000.00 $150,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $150,000.00 Local Match $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Revised - EXHIBIT A A-OFFICR25-2025-STLOUIPD-015 I Page 1 of 1 I City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution authorizing proposed 2025 DWI/Traffic Safety officer grant contract agreement Page 6 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Consent agenda item: 5e Executive summary Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Recommended action: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for the establishment and continued operation of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. Policy consideration: Does the City of St. Louis Park wish to continue to be a member of the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission? Summary: The natural drainage pattern for the City of St. Louis Park is fairly well-defined. There are two major watersheds within the city, Minnehaha Creek and Bassett Creek. These two watersheds are shown in the attached figure. Each of these watersheds is in an active watershed management organization. The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (Commission) has operated since 1969 under a joint powers agreement (JPA), which was entered into by the nine (9) member cities located within the watershed, including Crystal, Golden Valley, Medicine Lake, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale and St. Louis Park. JPA agreement allows the Commission to maintain and enhance the quality of the surface water resources within the watershed and manage flooding. This type of JPA organization directly represents the city through the city council-appointed commissioner, alternate commissioner and technical advisory committee representative. The BCWMC’s mission complements the St. Louis Park strategic priorities regarding educating staff and the public on environmental consciousness, stewardship and best management practices. The current version of the JPA expires on Jan. 1, 2025, and must be renewed by all nine member cities before Dec. 31, 2024, or the Commission will no longer have authority to operate. Financial or budget considerations: The cost of involvement with the Commission is budgeted annually and is funded by the stormwater utility fund. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Discussion Current Joint Powers Agreement St. Louis Park watershed district map Updated Joint Powers Agreement Prepared by: Erick Francis, water resources manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Page 2 Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Discussion Background: The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (Commission) has operated since 1969 under a joint powers agreement (JPA), which was entered into by the nine (9) member cities located within the watershed, including Crystal, Golden Valley, Medicine Lake, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale and St. Louis Park. JPA agreement allows the Commission to maintain and enhance the quality of the surface water resources within the watershed and manage flooding. This type of JPA organization directly represents the city through the city council-appointed commissioner, alternate commissioner and technical advisory committee representative. The BCWMC’s mission complements the St. Louis Park Strategic priorities regarding educating staff and the public on environmental consciousness, stewardship and best management practices. The current version of the JPA has been in effect since Aug. 29, 2014, and expires on Jan. 1, 2025. It must be renewed by all nine member cities before Dec. 31, 2024, or the Commission will no longer have the authority to operate. The revised JPA does not substantively alter the makeup, authority or fundamental operation of the Commission. However, it features the following changes: 1. The Commission directed their attorney to reformat the JPA to simplify the document and make it more user-friendly, which resulted in: • A reorganized and reformatted document. • Updates to important provisions based on current policies. • Removing unnecessary history. • The inclusion of provisions required by Minnesota Rules, section 8410.0030. 2. Clarifying changes to improve the document suggested by staff from all nine (9) member cities and commissioners reviewed and discussed the revised JPA at their monthly meeting. 3. The duration of the JPA was shortened from the historical 10-year term to eight years. This was done to separate the JPA renewal and the updating of the Watershed Management Plan, which is statutorily required to be updated every ten years. Appendix G Joint Powers Agreement City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 3 AMENDED JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT ORGANIZATION TO PLAN, CONTROL AND PROVIDE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF BASSETT CREEK (Showing Changes Effective August 29, 2014) PREFACE In1968, the nine cities with land in the Bassett Creek watershed entered into a joint powers agreement which established the Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission. For the past 25 years the Commission, consisting primarily of citizen volunteers and city staff members who have volunteered their time, have worked long and hard to achieve the goals set forth when the commission was established. An overall watershed management plan was prepared and approved after public hearings. The Commission has received technical advice from the United States Army Corps of Engineers in their planning and has obtained the support and aid of all United States Senators and Congressional Representatives representing the /member cities. In 1976 the Commission and the Corps of Engineers were successful in having Bassett Creek included in the 1976 Water Resources Development Act (Section 173 Public Law 94-587). The Board of Engineers for Rivers and Harbors submitted a favorable report to the Secretary of the Army on March 30,1977. The Secretary of the Army has by letter under date of June 19, 1978 notified the U. S. Congress of the approval of the Chief of Engineers. The Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission has participated with the Minnesota Department of Transportation, the Federal Highway Administration, the City of Minneapolis and the Corps of Engineers in the planning and construction of a deep tunnel in Minneapolis which is designed to carry Bassett Creek under a portion of the City of Minneapolis. The Commission has held hearings and approved and ordered upstream construction in the cities of Golden Valley, Plymouth, Minneapolis, and Crystal. The local share of these costs is being paid by the nine member communities pursuant to an agreement consistent with the funding requirements set forth in Articles VII and VIII of the joint powers agreement which has been in effect from 1968 to 1993. The prior joint powers agreement contained the following "Statement of Intent": STATEMENT OF INTENT REGARDING AGREEMENT "Bassett Creek leaves Medicine Lake and flows generally eastward through the Village of Medicine Lake, Plymouth, Golden Valley and into the City of Minneapolis. In Minneapolis, the creek is channeled into a conduit and runs underground to the Mississippi River to its eventual outfall. As the creek runs through the aforementioned communities it collects storm waters and in effect acts as the storm sewer for a large densely populated area and large unpopulated area. It also carries waters channeled to it or naturally flowing to it from the Villages of Minnetonka and New Hope and the Cities of Crystal, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park. For a long time the improvement and development of this creek to carry the increased quantity of storm water has been needed to allow for the orderly planning and development of City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 4 the up-stream communities who must rely on the creek as the outfall for storm waters collected or naturally flowing from areas within these communities. As the communities contributing water to the creek have grown, and the lands naturally draining into the creek have been covered with buildings and hard surfaced areas, the ability of the creek and its appurtenant facilities to accommodate the water has diminished. Studies have been conducted by the municipalities both individually and collectively and a study has been made by the United States Army Corps of Engineers. The threat of flood damage increases each year with the increased use of land in the watershed area. The nine member communities have been meeting over a number of years in an effort to solve the storm water problems in the watershed drained by Bassett Creek. Each year it becomes more apparent that solutions must be sought to allow for a more orderly and efficient planning of the area and to allow the individual communities to plan storm sewer facilities which must be constructed to serve lands within the individual communities. It is also apparent to all nine municipalities that planning and construction to control the Bassett Creek cannot be done on the basis of each community looking at its individual problems. The creek downstream must be improved to accommodate the waters which will eventually be channeled and diverted to the outfall. To determine the downstream improvements it is necessary to know how much water will be contributed by the individual communities upstream and how much storm water will be retained in ponding areas upstream and the area of lands within the watershed which will be controlled by the individual communities as "open lands" and which will not contribute as much storm water as lands which are developed residentially, commercially, or for industrial purposes. All of the nine communities within the Bassett Creek watershed recognize the aforestated problems. In seeking solutions to the overall drainage problem it becomes apparent that the only way the problems can be solved is by joint planning, joint cooperation, joint financing and a sincere desire on the part of each community to solve the overall drainage problem within the watershed. This means that some agency, commission, district, corporation, political subdivision, or other vehicle must be found to plan and finance improvements to and to control the development of lands within the watershed. Chapter 112 of the Minnesota Statutes provides for the formation of a watershed district with the powers and duties of conserving and controlling water and watercourses within a watershed. The creation of such a district creates a new political subdivision with the power to sue or be sued, to incur debts, liabilities and obligations, to exercise the powers of eminent domain, to provide for assessments, to borrow money and issue bonds and to do all other acts necessary to carry out the powers vested in the district by said Chapter 112. The managers of the district would be appointed by the Minnesota Water Resources Board and subsequent appointments would be by the Board of County Commissioners of Hennepin County. It is the belief of the parties to this agreement that the creation of such a district would remove control one step further from the electorate and the residents of this watershed area who ultimately would pay the costs of the aforesaid improvements. It would also create another political subdivision which would have to plan and work with the individual parties to this agreement to solve the storm water and drainage problems within the watershed. The purpose of this statement of intent regarding the agreement is to clarify and establish for any court of review or any arbitrator or for the elected successors to the representatives who have entered into this agreement, the reasons and purposes for this joint and cooperative agreement. The parties to this agreement realize that the success or failure of the Bassett Creek City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 5 Flood Control Commission created by this agreement is dependent upon the sincere desire of each member community to cooperate in the exercise of a joint power to solve a joint problem. Each party to this agreement pledges this cooperation." It is the intent of this amended agreement to carry forward the same purposes as aforestated and to revise the Joint Powers Agreement to meet the mandates of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 103B. 201 through 103B. 251 and Minnesota Rules (Chapter 8410 relating to "Metropolitan Area Local Water Management". This amended agreement shall continue the existence of a Watershed Management Organization in accordance with the provisions of the Metropolitan Surface Water Management Act as set forth in Minnesota Statutes 1992 Sections 103B. 201 to and including 103B. 251. The organization hereby created shall have all of the powers and responsibilities set forth in said statutes for the Bassett Creek Watershed. The purpose of the organization shall be to assist the 9 member communities to preserve and use natural water storage and retention systems to: 1.Protect, preserve, and use natural surface and groundwater storage and retention systems; 2. Minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; 3. Identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface water and groundwater quality; 4.Establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface water and groundwater quality: 5. Prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; 6. Promote groundwater recharge; 7. Protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; 8.To secure other benefits associated with the proper management of surface water. 9. To promote and encourage cooperation among member cities in coordinating local surface water and groundwater plans and to be aware of their neighbor's problems and to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare. 10. To continue the work of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission and to carry out the plans, policies and programs developed by said Commission from1968 to 1993. JOINT AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT The parties to this Agreement are governmental units of the State of Minnesota, all of which have lands which drain surface water into Bassett Creek and all of which have power to construct, reconstruct, extend and maintain storm water management facilities. This agreement is made pursuant to the authority conferred upon the parties by Minnesota Statutes 1992, Sections 471.59 and 103B. 201 to and including Section 103B. 251. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 6 NAME I. The parties hereto create and establish the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. GENERAL PURPOSE II. The general purpose of this agreement is to provide an organization which can investigate, study, plan and control the construction of facilities to drain or pond storm waters, to alleviate damage by flood waters; to improve the creek channel for drainage; to assist in planning for land use; to repair, improve, relocate, modify, consolidate or abandon, in whole or in part, drainage systems within the watershed area; and to do whatever is necessary to assist in water conservation and the abatement of surface water and groundwater contamination and water pollution. In addition to the aforestated purposes, the organization hereby created shall serve as the organization for the Bassett Creek watershed and shall carry out all of the duties and responsibilities outlined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 201 through 103B. 251, both inclusive. DEFINITIONS III. For the purposes of this agreement, the terms used herein shall have the meanings as defined in this article. Subdivision 1. "Commission" means the organization created by this agreement, the full name of which is "Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission." It shall be a public agency of its members. Subdivision 2. "Board" means the Board of commissioners of the Commission, consisting of one commissioner or one alternate commissioner from each of the governmental units which is a party to this agreement and which shall be the governing body of the Commission. Subdivision 3. "Council" means the governing body of a governmental unit which is a member of this Commission. Subdivision 4. "Governmental Unit" means any city, county, or town. Subdivision 5. "Member" means a governmental unit which enters into this agreement. Subdivision 6. "Bassett Creek Watershed" means the area contained within a line drawn around the extremities of all terrain whose surface drainage is tributary to Bassett Creek and within the mapped areas delineated on the map filed with the Board of Water and Soil Resources originally filed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, 473.877, Subd. 2 and as now amended by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 103B. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 7 MEMBERSHIP IV. The membership of the Commission shall consist of all of the following governmental units as shall elect, through resolution or ordinance adopted by their respective Councils, to become members: City of Crystal City of Golden Valley City of Medicine Lake City of Minneapolis City of Minnetonka City of New Hope City of Plymouth City of Robbinsdale City of St. Louis Park (The foregoing list is intended to include all governmental units which are presently partially or entirely within the Bassett Creek Watershed.) No change in governmental boundaries , structure or organizational status shall affect the eligibility of any governmental unit listed above to be represented on the Commission, so long as such governmental unit continues to exist as a separate political subdivision. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS V. Subdivision 1. The governing body of the Commission shall be its Board. Each member shall be entitled to appoint one representative on the Board, and one alternate who may sit when the representative is not in attendance and said representative or alternate representative shall be called a "Commissioner". Subdivision 2. The council of each member shall determine the eligibility or qualification of its representative on the Commission but the terms of each Commissioner shall be as established by this agreement. Subdivision 3. The term of each Commissioner and Alternate Commissioner appointed by each member shall be three years and until their successors are selected and qualify and shall City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 8 commence on February l, except that the terms of the Commissioners first appointed shall commence from the date of their appointment and shall terminate as follows: a.The Commissioners appointed by the Cities of Crystal, Golden Valley, and Medicine Lake shall terminate on February 1, 1994. b.The Commissioners appointed by the Cities of Minneapolis, Minnetonka, and New Hope shall terminate on February 1, 1995. c.The Commissioners appointed by the Cities of Plymouth, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park shall terminate on February 1, 1996. Any vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired term of any Commissioner by the council of the governmental unit of the member who appointed said Commissioner. The Commission shall notify the Board of Water and Soil Resources of member appointments and vacancies within 30 days after the Commission is notified by a member. Each member agrees to publish a notice of vacancies resulting from the expiration of a Commissioner's or Alternate Commissioner's term or where a vacancy exists for any reason. Publication and notice shall be in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.227, Subds. 1 and 2, as they now exist or as subsequently amended. Subdivision 4. The council of each member agrees that its representative commissioner will not be removed from the Board prior to the expiration of the Commissioner's term, unless said Commissioner consents in writing or unless said council has presented the Commissioner with charges in writing and has held a public hearing after reasonable notice to the Commissioner. A member may remove a Commissioner or an Alternate Commissioner for just cause or for violation of a Code of Ethics established by the Commission or by the Member City or for malfeasance, nonfeasance, or misfeasance. Said hearing shall be held by the Member City Council who appointed the Commissioner. A Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner who is an elected officer of a Member City who is not reelected may be removed by the appointing Member City at the appointing Member's discretion. Any decision by a Member to remove a Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner may be appealed to the Board of Water and Soil Resources. A certified copy of the Council's Resolution removing said Commissioner shall be filed with the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners and shall show compliance with the terms of this section. Subdivision 5. Each member shall within 30 days of appointment file with the Secretary of the Board of Commissioners a record of the appointment of its Commissioner and Alternate Commissioner. The Commission shall notify the Board of Water and Soil Resources of Member appointments and vacancies within 30 days after receiving notice from the Member. Members shall fill all vacancies within 90 days after the vacancy occurs. Subdivision 6. Commissioners shall serve without compensation from the Commission, but this shall not prevent a governmental unit from providing compensation for its Commissioner for serving on the Board, if such compensation is authorized by such governmental unit and by law. Commission funds may be used to reimburse a Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner for expenses incurred in performing Commission business and if authorized by the Board. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 9 Subdivision 7. At the first meeting of the Board and in February of each year thereafter, the Board shall elect from its Commissioners a Chair, a Vice Chair, a Secretary, a Treasurer , and such other officers as it deems necessary to conduct its meetings and affairs. At the organizational meeting or as soon thereafter as it may be reasonably done, the Commission shall adopt rules and regulations governing its meetings. Such rules and regulations may be amended from time to time at either a regular or a special meeting of the Commission provided that a ten day prior notice of the proposed amendment has been furnished to each person to whom notice of the Board meetings is required to be sent; a majority vote of all eligible votes of the then existing members of the Commission shall be sufficient to adopt any proposed amendment to such rules and regulations. The Board shall notify each Member City of the location and time of regular and special meetings called by the Board. A meeting shall be held at least annually, and all meetings shall be called and open to the public pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.705, or as amended. POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD VI. Subdivision l. The Commission, acting by its duly appointed Board of Commissioners, shall as it relates to flood control, water quality, ground water recharge and water conservation or in its construction of facilities and other duties as set forth in Minnesota Laws have the powers and duties set out in this article. Subdivision2. It may employ such persons as it deems necessary to accomplish its duties and powers. Any employee may be on a full time, part time or consulting basis as the Board determines. Subdivision 3. It may contract for space and for material and supplies to carry on its activities either with a member or elsewhere. Subdivision 4. It may acquire necessary personal property to carry out its powers and its duties. Subdivision 5. It shall develop an overall plan containing a capital improvement program within a reasonable time after qualifying, and said plan shall meet all of the requirements as established in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter103B. Said overall plan shall establish a comprehensive goal for the development of Bassett Creek and shall establish a proposed procedure for accomplishing the purposes of the organization as set forth in Article II. In preparing the overall plan, the Board may consult with the engineering and planning staff of each member governmental unit. It may consult with the Metropolitan Council and other public and private bodies to obtain and consider projections of land use, population growth, and other factors which are relevant to the improvement and development of the Bassett Creek watershed. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 10 Said overall plan shall include the location and adequacy of the outlet or outfall of said Bassett Creek. The plan shall include the quantity of storage facilities and the sizing of an adequate outlet for all branch lateral storm sewers within the Bassett Creek watershed. The plan shall comply with state statutes and regulations promulgated and adopted by the Board of Water and Soil Resources. Upon completion of the overall plan, or amendments thereto, the Board shall supply each member with a copy of the proposed plan and shall submit the plan for review and comment to Hennepin County, all soil and water conservation districts in Hennepin County and to all statutory and home rule charter cities having territory within the watershed. All governmental units which expect that substantial amendment of its local comprehensive plan will be necessary in order to bring their local water management into conformance with the Commission's watershed plan shall describe as specifically as possible, the amendments to the local plan which it expects will be necessary. The Commission shall hold a public hearing after 60 days mailed notice to the clerk of each member governmental unit. The mailed notice of the hearing shall be sent at the same time the plan is submitted to the members and to other governmental agencies. After such public hearing, the Board shall prescribe the overall plan which shall be the outline for future action by the Commission. The Commission shall then submit the plan, any comments received and any appropriate amendments to the plan to the Board of Commissioners of Hennepin County. The County shall approve or disapprove projects in the capital improvement program which may require the provision of county funds pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Sections103B. 251or103D. 901. The County shall have 60 days to complete its review. If the County fails to complete its review within 60 days the plan and capital improvement programs shall be deemed approved. After completion of the review by Hennepin County, the plan and capital improvement program shall be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for its review. After completion of the review by the Metropolitan Counci1 pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section103B. 231, Subd. 8, the Commission shall submit the plan to the Minnesota Commissioner of Natural Resources and the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency for review and comment on the consistency of the plan with state laws and rules relating to water and related land resources and to the Board of Water and Soil Resources for review as provided in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 231, Subd. 9. After return of the plan, the Commission shall submit to each of its members a copy of the plan and all comments of the reviewing authorities. The Commission shall wait for at least 30 days for comments from the members. The Commission shall adopt the overall plan within 120 days after approval of the plan by the Board of Water and Soil Resources. The Commission shall then implement the approved plan and approved capital improvement program by resolution of the Commission as hereinafter set forth. The adoption of said overall plan shall be only upon a favorable vote of a majority of all eligible votes of the then existing members of the Commission. A copy of the adopted plan shall be filed with the clerk of each member governmental unit. Upon notice and hearing as provided for in adopting the overall plan , said plan may be amended by the Board on its own initiative or on the petition of any member governmental unit. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 11 The review provisions set forth in this section are those required by Minnesota Statutes, Section103B. 231. If the law is amended, approvals shall be as required by law and the provisions contained in this section shall be amended accordingly. Subdivision 6. It shall make necessary surveys or utilize other reliable surveys and data and develop projects to accomplish the purposes for which the Commission is organized. Subdivision 7. It may cooperate or contract with the State of Minnesota or any subdivision thereof or federal agency or private or public organization to accomplish the purposes for which it is organized. Subdivision 8. It may order any member governmental unit or units to construct, clean, repair, alter, abandon, consolidate, reclaim or change the course or terminus of any ditch, drain, storm sewer, or water course, natural or artificial, within the Bassett Creek watershed. Subdivision 9. It may order any member governmental unit or units to acquire, operate, construct or maintain dams, dikes, reservoirs and appurtenant works or other improvements necessary to implement the overall plan. Subdivision 10. It shall regulate, conserve and control the use of storm and surface water and groundwater within the Bassett Creek watershed. Subdivision 11. It may contract for or purchase such insurance as the Board deems necessary for the protection of the Commission. Subdivision 12. It may establish and maintain devices for acquiring and recording hydrological and water quality data within the Bassett Creek watershed. Subdivision 13. It may enter upon lands within or without the watershed to make surveys and investigations to accomplish the purposes of the Commission. The Commission shall be liable for actual damages resulting therefrom but every person who claims damages shall serve the Chairman or Secretary of the Board of Commissioners with a Notice of Claim as required by Chapter 466.05 of the Minnesota Statutes. Subdivision 14. It shall provide any member governmental unit with technical data or any other information of which the Commission has knowledge which will assist the governmental unit in preparing land use classifications or local water management plans within the watershed. Subdivision 15. It may provide legal and technical assistance in connection with litigation or other proceedings between one or more of its members and any other political subdivision, commission, Board or agency relating to the planning or construction of facilities to drain or pond storm waters or relating to water quality within the Bassett Creek watershed. The use of commission funds for litigation shall be only upon a favorable vote of a majority of the eligible votes of the then existing members of the Commission. Subdivision 16. It may accumulate reserve funds for the purposes herein mentioned and may invest funds of the Commission not currently needed for its operations, in the manner and subject to the laws of Minnesota applicable to statutory cities. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 12 Subdivision 17. It may collect monies, subject to the provisions of this agreement, from its members, Hennepin County and from any other source approved by a majority of its Board. Subdivision 18. It may make contracts, incur expenses and make expenditures necessary and incidental to the effectuation of these purposes and powers and may disburse therefor in the manner hereinafter provided. Subdivision 19. It shall cause to be made an annual audit by a certified public accountant or the state auditor of the books and accounts of the Commission and shall make and file a report to its members at least once each year including the following information: a.the approved budget; b. a reporting of revenues; c.a reporting of expenditures; d. a financial audit report or section that includes a balance sheet, a classification of revenues and expenditures, an analysis of changes in final balances, and any additional statements considered necessary for full financial disclosure; e.the status of all Commission projects and work within the watershed; and f. the business transacted by the commission and other matters which affect the interests of the commission. Copies of said report shall be transmitted to the clerk of each member governmental unit. Subdivision 20. Its books, reports and records shall be available for and open to inspection by its members at all reasonable times. Subdivision 21. It may recommend changes in this agreement to its members. Subdivision 22. It may exercise all other powers necessary and incidental to the implementation of the purposes and powers set forth herein and as outlined and authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Sections 103B. 201 through 103B. 251. Subdivision 23. It shall cooperate with the State of Minnesota, the Commissioner of Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals of the Department of Natural Resources in obtaining permits and complying with the requirements of Chapter 103G of the Minnesota Statutes. Subdivision 24. Each member reserves the right to conduct separate or concurrent studies on any matter under study by the Commission. Subdivision 25. It shall establish a procedure for establishing citizen or technical advisory committees and to provide other means for public participation. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 13 METHOD OF PROCEEDING VII. Subdivision 1. The procedures to be followed by the Board in carrying out the powers and duties set forth in Article VI, Subdivisions 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, shall be as set forth in this article. Subdivision 2. The Commissioners shall be the same as those serving as Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners for the predecessor Bassett Creek Water Management Commission. The Board shall immediately proceed to revise the overall plan as set forth in Article VI, Subdivision 5 or as required by state statute. Upon adoption of said overall plan, the Board shall proceed to implement said plan, and this implementation may be ordered by stages. Subdivision 3. The Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission shall be the successor to the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission as constituted under the prior Joint Powers Agreement. All personal property, money, bank accounts, records or any other thing of value and on hand with the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission shall be transferred to the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission. Subdivision 4. The location and adequacy of the outlet for Bassett Creek shall be determined and the Commission shall then prepare plans which will provide capacity to outlet the surface waters which will be collected within the Bassett Creek watershed. In determining the necessary capacity for said outlet, the Commission shall take into consideration the quantity of land within the watershed which each member governmental unit has to pond or act as a reservoir for surface waters. It shall consider only lands which are under public ownership or under public control and that will be perpetually dedicated to acting as a reservoir for surface waters. The Commission may require from each member governmental unit a commitment in writing of the lands which shall be so dedicated, including a legal description of the gross area and the capacity in acre feet of water storage. No project which will channel or divert additional waters to Bassett Creek shall be commenced by any member governmental unit prior to approval of the Board of the design of an adequate outlet or of adequate storage facilities. The adequacy of said outlet shall be determined by the Board after consultations with its professional engineers. Subdivision 5. All construction, reconstruction, extension or maintenance of Bassett Creek including outlets, lift stations, dams, reservoirs, or other appurtenances of a surface water or storm sewer system which involve construction by or assessment against any member governmental unit or against privately or publicly owned land within the watershed shall follow the statutory procedures outlined in Chapter 429 of the Minnesota Statutes except as herein modified. The Board shall secure from its engineers or some other competent persona report advising it in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible and as to whether it shall best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement and the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended and the proposed allocation of costs between members. The Board shall then hold a public hearing on the proposed improvement after mailed notice to the clerk of each member governmental unit within the watershed. The Commission City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 14 shall not be required to mail or publish notice except by said notice to the clerk. Said notice shall be mailed not less than 45 days before the hearing , shall state the time and place of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated total cost and the estimated cost to each member governmental unit. The Board may adjourn said hearing to obtain further information, may continue said hearing pending action of the member governmental units or may take such other action as it deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this Commission. To order the improvement, in accordance with the powers and duties established in Article VI, Subdivisions 7, 8 and 9, a resolution setting forth the order for a capital improvement project shall require a favorable vote by two-thirds of all eligible votes of then existing Board of the Commission. In all cases other than for capital improvement projects, a majority vote of all eligible members of the Board shall be sufficient to order the work. The order shall describe the improvement, shall allocate in percentages the cost allocation between the member governmental units, shall designate the engineers to prepare plans and specifications, and shall designate the member who will contract for the improvement in accordance with Subdivision 7 of this Article. After the Board has ordered an improvement or if the hearing is continued while the member governmental units act on said proposal, it shall forward said preliminary report to all member governmental units with an estimated time schedule for the construction of said improvement. The Board shall allow an adequate amount of time , and in no event less than 45 days, for each member governmental unit to conduct hearings, in accordance with the provisions of the aforestated Chapter 429 or the charter requirements of any city, or to ascertain the method of financing which said member governmental unit will utilize to pay its proportionate share of the costs of the improvement. Each member governmental unit shall ascertain within a period of 90 days the method it shall use to pay its proportionate share of the costs. If the Commission proposes to utilize Hennepin County’s bonding authority as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 251, or if the Commission proposes to certify all or any part of a capital improvement to Hennepin County for payment, then and in that event all proceedings shall be carried out in accordance with the provisions set forth in said Section 1038.251. The Board shall not order and no engineer shall prepare plans and specifications before the Board has adopted a resolution ordering the improvement. The Board may order the advertising for bids upon receipt of notice from each member governmental unit who will be assessed that it has completed its hearing or determined its method of payment or upon expiration of 90 days after the mailing of the preliminary report to the members. Subdivision 6. Any member governmental unit being aggrieved by the determination of the Board as to the allocation of the costs of said improvement shall have 30 days after the commission resolution ordering the improvement to appeal said determination. Said appeal shall be in writing and shall be addressed to the Board asking for arbitration. The determination of the member's appeal shall be referred to a Board of Arbitration. The Board of Arbitration shall consist of three persons; one to be appointed by the Board of Commissioners, one to be appointed by the appealing member governmental unit, and the third to be appointed by the two so selected. In the event the two persons so selected do not appoint the third person within 15 days after their appointment, then the Chief Judge of the District Court of Hennepin County shall City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 15 have jurisdiction to appoint, upon application of either or both of the two earlier selected, the third person to the Board of Arbitration. The third person selected shall not be a resident of any member governmental unit and if appointed by the Chief Judge said person shall be a registered professional engineer. The arbitrators’ expenses and fees, together with the other expenses, not including counsel fees, incurred in the conduct of the arbitration shall be divided equally between the Commission and the appealing member. Arbitration shall be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Arbitration Act, Chapter 572 of the Minnesota Statutes. Subdivision 7. Contracts for Improvements. All contracts which are to be let as a result of the Board’s order to construct, repair, alter, reclaim or change the course or terminus of any ditch, drain, storm sewer, or watercourse, or to acquire, operate, construct or maintain dams, dikes, reservoirs or their appurtenances or to carry out any of the other provisions of the plan as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, and for which two or more member governmental units shall be responsible for the costs, shall be let in accordance with the provisions of Section 429.041 of the Minnesota Statutes. The bidding and contracting of said work shall be let by any one of the member governmental units, as ordered by the Board of Commissioners, after compliance with the statutes. All contracts and bidding procedures shall comply with all the requirements of law applicable to contracts let by a statutory city in the State of Minnesota. The Commission shall not have the authority to contract in its own name for any improvement work for which a special assessment will be levied against any private or public property under the provisions of Chapter 429 or under the provisions of any City charter. These contracts shall be awarded by action of the council of a member and shall be in the name of a member governmental unit. This section shall not preclude the Commission from proceeding under Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 251. Subdivision 8. Contracts with Other Governmental Bodies. The Commission may exercise the powers set forth inArticleV1, Subdivision 7, but said contracts for a capital improvement shall require a favorable vote of two-thirds majority of the eligible votes of the then existing members of the Commission. Subdivision 9. Supervision. All improvement contracts awarded under the provisions of Subdivision 7of this Article shall be supervised by the member governmental unit awarding said contract or said member governmental unit may contract or appoint any qualified staff member or members of the Commission to carry out said supervision, but each member agrees that the staff of this Commission shall be authorized to observe and review the work in progress and the members agree to cooperate with the Commission staff in accomplishing the purposes of this Commission. Representatives of the Commission shall have the right to enter upon the place or places where the improvement work is in progress for the purpose of making reasonable tests and inspections. The staff of this Commission shall report and advise and recommend to the Board on the progress of said work. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 16 Subdivision 10. Land Acquisition. The Commission shall not have the power of eminent domain. The member governmental units agree that any and all easements or interest in land which are necessary will be negotiated or condemned in accordance with Chapter 117 of the Minnesota Statutes by the unit wherein said lands are located, and each member agrees to acquire the necessary easements or right of way or partial or complete interest in land upon order of the Board of Commissioners to accomplish the purposes of this agreement. All reasonable costs of said acquisition shall be considered as a cost of the improvement. If a member governmental unit determines it is in the best interests of that member to acquire additional lands, in conjunction with the taking of lands for storm and surface drainage or storage, for some other purposes, the costs of said acquisition will not be included in the improvement costs of the ordered project. The Board in determining the amount of the improvement costs to be assessed to each member governmental unit may take into consideration the land use for which said additional lands are being acquired and may credit the acquiring municipality for said land acquisition to the extent that it benefits the other members of this agreement. Any credits may be applied to the cost allocation of the improvement project under construction or the Board if feasible and necessary may defer said credits to a future project. If any member unit refuses to negotiate or condemn lands as ordered by the Board, any other member may negotiate or condemn outside its corporate limits in accordance with the aforesaid Chapter 117. All members agree that they will not condemn or negotiate for land acquisition to pond or drain storm and surface waters within the corporate boundaries of another member within the Bassett Creek watershed except upon order of the Board of this Commission. The Commission shall have authority to establish land acquisition policies as a part of the overall plan. The policies shall be designed to equalize costs of land throughout the watershed. Said policy is contained in the existing watershed management plan and may be continued in any revised overall plan required by Minnesota Statutes. Subdivision 11. Pollution Control and Water Quality. The Commission shall have the authority and responsibility to protect and improve water quality in the watershed as this is one of the main purposes set forth in the Surface Water Management Act. All member governmental units agree that they will refuse to allow the drainage of sanitary sewage or industrial wastes onto any land or into any watercourse or storm sewer draining into Bassett Creek. The Board may investigate on its own initiative and shall investigate upon petition of any member all complaints relating to pollution of surface water or groundwater draining into or affecting Bassett Creek or its tributaries. Upon a finding that the creek or surface waters or groundwater are being polluted, the Board shall order the member governmental unit to abate this nuisance and each member agrees that it will take all reasonable action available to it under the law to alleviate the pollution and to assist in protecting and improving the water quality of surface water and groundwater in the watershed. Subdivision 12. Local Water Management Plans. The Commission shall have power and authority to review the members’ local water management plans, capital improvement programs and official controls required by Minnesota Statutes Section 103B. 235 and/ or by rules promulgated and adopted by the Board of Water and Soil Resources. The members also understand that the overall plan and capital improvement program required for the entire watershed must consist of the local parts in the plan and therefore every effort shall be made by City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 17 the Commission to coordinate the local plans with the watershed’s overall plan. The members further understand and agree that upon completion and approval of the overall plan required by Minnesota Statutes 103B. 231, each member will be required to present their local management plan to the Commission as required by Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 235. It is therefore important that each member provide the Commission with their best effort to coordinate and plan for the individual member's local plan at the same time the watershed overall plan is being assembled. FINANCES VIII. Subdivision 1. The Commission funds may be expended by the Board in accordance with this agreement and in accordance with the procedures as established by law and in the manner as may be determined by the Board. The Board shall designate one or more national or state bank or trust companies, authorized by Chapters 118 and 427 of the Minnesota Statutes to receive deposits of public moneys and to act as depositories for the Commission funds. In no event shall there be a disbursement of Commission funds without the signature of at 1east two Board members, one of whom shall be the Treasurer or his Authorized Deputy Treasurer. The Treasurer shall be required to file with the Secretary of the Board a bond in the sum of at least $10,000 or such higher amount as shall be determined by the Board. The Commission shall pay the premium on said bond. Subdivision 2. The members agree to contribute all cash, bank deposits, and other assets held by the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission to the new Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission to carry out the purposes of the Commission. Each member governmental unit has contributed its proportionate share of said funds based on the net tax capacity and area of all taxable property within the Bassett Creek watershed. Subdivision 3. Each member agrees to contribute each year to a general fund, said fund to be used for general administration purposes including, but not limited to: salaries, rent, supplies, development of an overall plan, insurance, and bonds, and to purchase and maintain devices to measure hydrological and water quality data. Said funds may also be used for normal maintenance of the facilities, but any extraordinary maintenance or repair expense shall be treated as an improvement cost and processed in accordance with Subdivision 4 of this Article. The annual contribution by each member shall be based fifty percent (50%)on the net tax capacity of all property within the watershed and fifty percent (50%) on the basis of the total area of each member within the boundaries of the Watershed each year to the total area in the Bassett Creek watershed. In no event shall any assessment require a contribution to exceed one-half of one percent of the net tax capacity within the watershed. Subdivision 4. (a)An improvement fund shall be established for each improvement project instituted under Article VII, Subdivision 3. Each member agrees to contribute to said fund its proportionate share of the engineering, legal and administrative costs as determined by the amount to be assessed against each member as a cost of the improvement. The Board shall submit in writing a City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 18 statement to each member, setting forth in detail the expenses incurred by the Commission for each project. Each member further agrees to pay to or contract with the member governmental unit awarding said contract for the improvement, its proportionate share of the cost of the improvement in accordance with the determination of the Board under Article VII, Subdivision 5. The member awarding the contract shall submit in writing copies of the engineer’s certificate authorizing payment during construction and the member being billed agrees to pay its proportionate share of said improvement costs within 30 days after receipt of the statement. The member awarding the contract shall advise other contributing members of the tentative time schedule of the work and the estimated times when the contributions shall be necessary. (b)Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the Commission may by a vote of 2/3rds of all eligible votes of the then existing members of the Commission decide to proceed to fund all or any part of the cost of a capital improvement contained in the capital improvement program of the plan pursuant to the authority and subject to the provisions set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 251. The Commission and Hennepin County may establish a maintenance fund to be used for normal and routine maintenance of an improvement constructed in whole or in part with money provided by Hennepin County pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section103B. 251. The levy and collection of an ad valorem tax levy for maintenance shall be by Hennepin County based upon a tax levy resolution adopted by a majority vote of all eligible members of the Commission and remitted to the County on or before the date prescribed by law each year. If it is determined to levy for maintenance, the Commission shall be required to follow the hearing process established by Minnesota Statutes, Section103D. 915 and103D. 921and acts amendatory thereof and in addition thereto. Mailed notice shall be sent to the Clerk of each member municipality at least 30 days prior to the hearing. Subdivision 5. On or before July1 of each year, the Board shall adopt a detailed budget for the ensuing year and decide upon the total amount necessary for the general fund. Budget approval shall require a favorable vote by a majority of all eligible votes of the then existing members of the Board. The Secretary of the Board shall certify the budget on or before July 1 to the clerk of each member governmental unit together with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each member. The Council of each member agrees to review the budget, and the Board shall upon notice from any member received prior to August 1, hear objections to the budget, and may, upon notice to all members and after a hearing, modify or amend the budget, and then give notice to the members of any and all modifications or amendments. Each member agrees to provide the funds required by the budget and said determination shall be conclusive if no member enters objections in writing on or before August 1. If no objections are submitted to the Board, each member agrees to provide the funds approved by the Board, after the Board has conducted the aforementioned hearing. Modifications or amendments to the original budget require a favorable vote by a majority of all eligible voters of then existing members of the Board. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 19 The budget shall not in any event require any member to contribute in excess of one- half of one percent of the net tax capacity of all taxable property within the watershed and within said members corporate boundaries. The schedule of payments by the members shall be determined by the Board in such a manner as to provide for an orderly collection of the funds needed. Upon notice and hearing, the Board by a favorable vote of a majority of all eligible votes of then existing members may adopt a supplemental budget requiring additional payments by the members within 60 days of its adoption but in no event shall the budget require any member to contribute in excess of one-half of one percent of the net tax capacity of all taxable property within the watershed or within any member's corporate boundaries in any one calendar year. Members’ attention is drawn to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 245, which authorizes a Watershed Management Tax District to be created within each member City to pay the costs of planning and for the purpose of paying capital costs and/or normal and routine maintenance of facilities. Subdivision 5. Cost Allocation. All capital costs incurred by the Commission shall be apportioned to the respective members on either (l), (2), or (3) of the following bases: (1)A negotiated amount to be arrived at by the members who have lands in the subdistrict responsible for the capital improvement. (2)(a)Fifty percent of all capital costs or the financing thereof shall be apportioned to each member on the basis of the real property valuation net tax capacity of each member within the boundaries of the watershed each year to the total real property valuation net tax capacity in the Bassett Creek watershed area governed by this Agreement. (b)Fifty percent of all capital costs or the financing thereof shall be apportioned to each member on the basis of the total area of each member within the boundaries of the watershed each year to the total area in the Bassett Creek watershed area governed by this Agreement. (c)Capital costs allocated under the 50% area/50% net tax capacity formula herein set forth may be varied by the Commission by a 2/3rds vote if: (1)any member community receives a direct benefit from the capital improvement which benefit can be defined as a lateral as well as a trunk benefit, or (2)the capital improvement provides a direct benefit to one or more members which benefit is so disproportionate as to require in a sense of fairness a modification in the 50/50 formula. (d)Credits to any member for lands acquired by said member to pond or store storm and surface water shall be allowed against costs set forth in Subsections (a), (b), and (c) of this Section. (3)If the project is constructed and financed pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B. 251, the members understand and agree that said costs will be levied on all taxable property in the watershed as set forth in the statute. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 20 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS IX. Subdivision 1. The Commission shall not have the power to issue certificates, warrants or bonds. Subdivision 2. The Commission shall not have the power of eminent domain and shall not own any interest in real property. All interests in lands shall be held in the name of the corporate member wherein said lands are located. Subdivision 3. The Commission shall not have the power to levy a special assessment upon any privately or publicly owned land. All such assessments shall be levied by the member wherein said lands are located. It shall have the power to require any member to contribute the costs allocated or assessed according to the other provisions of this agreement. Subdivision 4. Each member agrees that it will not directly or indirectly collect or divert any additional surface water to the Mississippi River or its tributaries from any subdistrict or subtrunk without a permit from the Board of Commissioners. Permits may be granted by the Board for a member to proceed with the construction or reconstruction of improvements within the individual corporate members’ boundaries and at its sole cost upon a finding: (a) that there is an adequate outlet; and (b)that said construction is in conformance with the overall plan; and (c)that the construction will not adversely affect other members of this agreement. Subdivision 5. Any member who is more than 60 days in default in contributing its share to the general fund shall have the vote of its Board member suspended pending the payment of its proportionate share. Any member who is more than 60 days in default in contributing its proportionate share of the cost of any improvement to the contracting member shall upon application of the contracting member have the vote of its Board member suspended, pending the payment of its proportionate share. Any Board member whose vote is under suspension shall not be considered as an eligible member as such membership affects the number of votes required to proceed on any matter under consideration by the Board. DURATION X. Subdivision l. Each member agrees to be bound by the terms of this agreement until January 1, 2025, and it may be continued thereafter at the option of the parties. Subdivision 2. This agreement may be terminated prior to January 1, 2025, by the unanimous consent of the parties. If the agreement is to be terminated, a notice of the intent to City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 21 dissolve the Commission shall be sent to the Board of Water and Soil Resources and to Hennepin County at least 90 days prior to the date of dissolution. Subdivision 3. In addition to the manner provided in Subdivision 2 for termination, any member may petition the Board to dissolve the agreement. Upon 90 days notice in writing to the clerk of each member governmental unit and to the Board of Water and Soil Resources and to Hennepin County, the Board shall hold a hearing and upon a favorable vote by a majority of all eligible votes of then existing Board members, the Board may by Resolution recommend that the Commission be dissolved. Said Resolution shall be submitted to each member governmental unit and if ratified by three-fourths of the councils of all eligible members within 60 days, said Board shall dissolve the Commission allowing a reasonable time to complete work in progress and to dispose of personal property owned by the Commission. DISSOLUTION XI. Upon dissolution of the Commission , all property of the Commission shall be sold and the proceeds thereof, together with monies on hand, shall be distributed to the eligible members of the Commission. Such distribution of Commission assets shall be made in proportion to the total contribution to the Commission as required by the last annual budget. EFFECTIVE DATE XII. This agreement shall be in full force and effect upon the filing of a certified copy of the resolution approving said agreement by all nine members. Said resolution shall be filed with the Chair of the existing Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission (presently W. Peter Enck of the City of New Hope), who shall notify all members in writing of its effective date and shall set the date for the next meeting to be conducted under this amended Joint Powers Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned governmental units, by action of their governing bodies, have caused this agreement to be executed in accordance with the authority of Minnesota Statutes Sections 103B. 211 and 471.59. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 22 St. Louis Park Edina Hopkins Golden Valley Minneapolis Minnetonka Plymouth Minnetonka HIGHWAY 7 INTERSTATE 394 HIGHWAY 169MINNETONKA 36TH 34TH LAKE27THTEXASFLAG WALKER EXCELSI O R FRANCEHIGHWAY 10041STFLORIDAGEORGIA YOSEMITE16TH OXFORDJERSEY37TH 35THKENTUCKYRHODE ISLAND38TH W O O D D A L E LIB R A R Y ALABAMA1ST39TH CEDAR LAKEAQUILAKIPLING2ND28TH FORD WAYZATA 25 1/2 31ST GORHAM BELT LINEINGLEWOODCLUB SHELARD 26TH VIRGINIA 23RDUTICAZARTHANVERNONZINRANBRUNSWICK36 1/2 PARK GLE N TOLEDO32ND 3 9 4 H O V HUNTINGTONLYNNMARYLANDIDAHOMELROSE24TH 42NDPARK PLACEGLENHURSTNORTH NEVADABROOKSIDE22ND SALEM40TH DIVISION WEBSTERJOPPAXENWOODDAKOTA29TH FRANKLIN 43 1/2 FORES T GOODRICH 25TH HAMILTON 18TH DUKEEDGEBRO OK MORNINGSIDESERVICE DR HIGHWAY 7BOONE14TH 30 1/2 VALLACH E RUTAHXYLON 44TH MONTEREYQ U E B E C RALEIGHLOUISIANACAVELLJORDANT A F T POWELL BARRY QUENTINSUMTERBURDCOLORADOWOLFE 13TH PENNSYLVANIAOTTAWARIDGE33RD RANDALLNATCHEZEDGEWOODWESTSIDE PHILLIPSHAMPSHIREOREGONHILLMO N I T O R PARKLANDSPRINCETONPRIVATEBLACKSTONEGENERAL MILLSDECATUR42 1/2HILLSBORO WOOD CAMBRIDGE MINNEHAHA HIGHW O O D PARKDALE CAMERATA DREWENSIGNFAIRWAYSALEM28THZINRAN14TH LAKEINGLEWOOD22ND 35TH NATCHEZ28TH UTICALYNN35TH 23RD FLORIDA41STYOSEMITE VERNON33RD OREGONUTAH16TH 29TH22ND 27TH 33RD 41STJERSEY WEBSTER26TH QUENTIN24TH 31ST ALABAMAC A V E L L 28TH QUEBECIDAHOLYNNYOSEMITE27TH 39THBLACKSTONEQUEBEC GLENHURST39TH 32ND 28TH ALABAMAHAMPSHIRE32NDNEVADA 26TH 37THSALEMWAY Z A T A BOONE14TH HAMPSHIREEDGEWOODJOPPAHIGHWAY 169IDAHOQUEBECHIGHWAY 10031ST 37THDECATUR18TH29TH 32ND JOPPADAKOTA14TH XENWOODDAKOTAINTERSTATE 394 31ST MONTEREY36THJORDAN 37TH 22ND FRANCEUTICA36TH 36THZARTHANNEVADA16THEDGEWOOD 34TH RALE IGHFORD34TH HIGHWAY 7 SUMTER13THTEXASUTICABOONEFLAGAQUILA TOLEDOMINNEHAHA CREEK NINE MILE CREEK BASSETT CREEK SHINGLE CREEK MISSISSIPPI RIVERRI L E Y / P U R G A T O R Y / B L U F F C R E E K ELM CRE E K SIX CITIES Minneapolis Plymouth Eden Prairie Bloomington Edina Minnetonka Richfield Golden ValleyMedina ChanhassenOrono¶ 0 1,600 3,200 4,800 6,400Feet Legend Regional City Limits St. Louis Park City Limits Watershed Districts BASSETT CREEK MINNEHAHA CREEK NINE MILE CREEK City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission LocaDl isWtarticetrsshedPage 23 JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MANAGEMENT COMMISSION THIS JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into by and among the cities of Crystal, Golden Valley, Medicine Lake, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park, all Minnesota municipal corporations. The member cities may hereafter be referred to individually as a "Member" or collectively as the "Members." RECITALS A.In 1968, the Members, all of which have lands which drain surface water into Bassett Creek, and all of which have power to construct, reconstruct, extend and maintain storm water management facilities, elected to exercise their authority to adopt a joint powers agreement to establish the Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission to cooperatively manage and plan for the management of surface water within the Bassett Creek watershed ("Watershed"). B.In 1982, the Minnesota legislature passed the Metropolitan Area Surface Water Management Act requiring local government units in the metropolitan area to plan for and manage surface water through watershed management (Minnesota Statutes, section 103B.201 to 103B.255)("Act"). C.Under the Act, one of the options available to local government units to satisfy the requirements of the Act is to enter into a joint powers agreement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 4 71.59 to establish a watershed management organization to jointly plan for and manage surface water within a watershed. D.In compliance with the Act, the original Bassett Creek Flood Control Commission amended its joint powers agreement and became the Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission ("Commission"). Over time, the joint powers agreement has been updated and amended, and the terms and conditions of the current joint powers agreement expire on January 1, 2025. E.The Members previously established the board of commissioners of the Commission ("Board") and desire for said Board to be reaffirmed as the entity charged with the authority and responsibility to manage the Commission. F.The Board has previously acted to adopt a watershed management plan ("Watershed Management Plan") for the watershed and has regularly updated and carried out said Watershed Management Plan in accordance with the Act. G.The Members desire to enter into this Agreement to reaffirm the Commission and the Board in furtherance of its efforts to continue working cooperatively to prepare and administer a surface water management plan to manage surface water within the Watershed, in accordance with the Act and Minnesota Rules, chapter 8410, and to carry out all additional functions and responsibilities described herein. BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 24 AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, the Members mutually agree as follows: SECTION I ESTABLISHMENT, GENERAL PURPOSE, AND DEFINITIONS 1.1 Reaffirming the Establishment. The Members hereby reaffirm and continue the establishment of the "Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission" pursuant to their authority under the Act and Minnesota Statutes, section 4 71.59. The Commission will continue to operate as a duly formed joint powers watershed management organization in accordance with said laws, applicable rules, and this Agreement. 1.2 General Purpose. The general purpose of this Agreement is to continue the Commission and the Board, which the Members previously established, to jointly and cooperatively adopt, administer, and update, as necessary, the Watershed Management Plan, and to carry out the following express purposes: (a)serve as the watershed management organization for the Watershed and carry out all of the duties and responsibilities outlined in the Act; (b)investigate, study, plan and control the construction of facilities to drain or pond storm waters to alleviate damage by flood waters; (c)protect, preserve, and use natural surface water and groundwater storage and retention systems; (d)minimize public capital expenditures needed to correct flooding and water quality problems; (e)identify and plan for means to effectively protect and improve surface water and groundwater quality; (f)establish more uniform local policies and official controls for surface water and groundwater management; (g)prevent erosion of soil into surface water systems; (h)promote groundwater recharge; (i)improve the creek channel for drainage; U)assist in planning for land use; 2 BA295-1-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 25 (k)protect and enhance fish and wildlife habitat and water recreational facilities; (I)repair, improve, relocate, modify, consolidate or abandon, in whole or in part, drainage systems within the Watershed; (m)secure the other benefits associated with the proper management of surface water and groundwater; (n)assist in water conservation and the abatement of surface water and groundwater contamination and water pollution; (o)assist the Members in the preservation and use of natural water storage and retention systems; (p)promote and encourage cooperation among member cities in coordinating local surface water and groundwater plans and to be aware of their neighbors' problems and to protect the public health, safety, and general welfare; and (q)continue the work of the Bassett Creek Water Management Commission and to carry out the plans, policies and programs developed by the Commission ovet time. All existing policies will remain in effect and may be amended by the Commission, as it determines may be necessary to achieve its purposes and objectives. The plan and programs will operate within the boundaries of the Watershed as identified in the official map filed with the Minnesota Board of Soil and Water Resources, as it may be amended from time to time, which is incorporated into this Agreement as if fully set forth herein. The boundaries of the Watershed are subject to change utilizing the procedures set out in the Act, which may be necessary to better reflect the hydrological boundaries of the Watershed. 1.3 Definitions. For the purposes of this Agreement, and in addition to any other terms expressly defined elsewhere throughout, the following terms have the meanings given them below. (a)Board.The board of commissioners of the Commission, consisting of one Commissioner or one Alternate Commissioner from each Member, and which is the governing body of the Commission. (b)Commission. The organization created by this Agreement, the full name of which is the "Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission," a duly formed joint powers watershed management organization under Minnesota law. (c)Member. A Minnesota municipal corporation which enters into this Agreement, each of which are expressly listed in section 2.1. (d)Voting Commissioner. A Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner present during a Board meeting with voting rights. Pursuant to section 3.2(b) below, an Alternate 3 BA295-l-930587. v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 26 Commissioner only has voting rights in the event of absence or disability of their respective Commissioner. Each Voting Commissioner has one (1) vote on the Board. (e)Watershed. The area contained within a line drawn around the extremities of all terrainwhose surface drainage is tributary to Bassett Creek and within the mapped areas delineated on the map filed with the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources ("BWSR") pursuant to the Act. SECTION II MEMBERSHIP 2.1 Members. The following nine municipal corporations and parties to this Agreement, each of which is either partially or entirely located within the Watershed, are Members of the Commission: Crystal, Golden Valley, Medicine Lake, Minneapolis, Minnetonka, New Hope, Plymouth, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park. 2.2 Change in Boundaries. No change in governmental boundaries, structure, or organizational status will affect the eligibility of any Member listed above to be represented on the Commission, so long as such local government unit continues to exist as a separate political subdivision. SECTION III BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 3 .1 Establishment. The Members hereby reaffirm the establishment and continued operation of the Board in accordance with the Act. The Board will carry out the purposes and have the powers as provided herein. 3.2 Board Appointments. The Commission is governed by the Board, which consists of representatives appointed by the nine Members in accordance with this section. More specifically, each Member to this Agreement must appoint one Commissioner and one Alternate Commissioner to the Board. Each Member's governing body will determine the eligibility and qualifications of its representatives on the Board. (a)Commissioner. Each Member is responsible for appointing one person to serve as its primary representative ("Commissioner") on the Board. Each Member is responsible for publishing a notice of a vacancy, whether resulting from expiration of its Commissioner position or otherwise, as required in Minnesota Statutes, section l 038.227, subdivision 2. (b)Alternate Commissioner. Each Member may also appoint one alternate representative ("Alternate Commissioner") to the Board in the same manner required to appoint a Commissioner. A Member's Alternate Commissioner may only vote on a matter before the Commission in the event of either absence or disability of the appointing Member's Commissioner (in either event, the Alternate Commissioner is considered a Voting Commissioner). If the absent or disabled Commissioner is also an officer of the Board, the Alternate Commissioner will not be entitled to serve as such officer. If necessary, 4 BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 27 the Board may select a current Commissioner to temporarily undertake the duties of the absent officer. (c)Term. All Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners will serve until their successors are selected and otherwise qualify, unless they resign or are removed earlier as provided herein. All Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners will serve three- year terms, and said terms will be staggered with expiration dates for those presently appointed remaining as follows: (1)The terms of the existing representatives appointed by the cities of Minneapolis, Minnetonka, and New Hope will expire on February 1, 2025. (2)The terms of the existing representatives appointed by the cities of Plymouth, Robbinsdale, and St. Louis Park will expire on February 1, 2026. (3)The terms of the existing representatives appointed by the cities of Crystal, Golden Valley, and Medicine Lake will expire on February 1, 2027. (ci)Notices. A Member will provide the Commission written notice of its appointments, including the resolution making the appointments or a copy of the minutes for the meeting at which the appointments were made. The Commission will notify BWSR of appointments and vacancies within 30 days after receiving notice from the Member. Members must fill all vacancies within 90 days after the vacancy occurs. (cii)Vacancies. A Member will notify the Commission in writing within 10 days of the occurrence of a vacancy in its Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner positions. The Commission will notify BWSR of the vacancy within 30 days of receiving the notice of a vacancy as required by Minn. Stat. § 103B.227, subd. 1. The Member will publish notice of any vacancy, whether by expiration of term or for any other reason, in accordance with Minn. Stat.§ 103B.227, subd. 2, as it may be amended. The notices must state that those interested in being appointed to serve on the Commission may submit their names to the Member for consideration. The notice must be published at least 15 days before the Member's governing body acts to fill the vacancy. The governing body must make the appointment within 90 days from the occurrence of the vacancy. The Member will promptly notify the Commission of the appointment in writing. The appointed person will serve the unexpired term of the position. (ciii)Removal. The governing body of any Member may remove its respective Commissioner for just cause as provided in Minn. Stat. § 103B.227, subd. 3 and in accordance with Minn. R., part 8410.0040. If a Commissioner is an elected official, said governing body may remove the Commissioner if the Commissioner is not reelected. The governing body of any Member may remove its Alternate Commissioner with or without cause. The Member will notify the Board of any such removal in writing within 10 days of acting to remove the Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner, as the case may be. The Commission will notify BWSR of the vacancy 5 BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 28 within 30 days of receiving such notice. The Member must act to fill the vacancy created by the removal within 90 days, as provided in this Agreement. (g)Suspension of Authority. The authority of a Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner to vote will be suspended if the appointing Member is more than 60 days delinquent in making any payments due to the Commission as provided by this Agreement. The voting authority will be reinstated once the Member pays all past due amounts. 3.3 Compensation and Expenses. Commissioners shall serve without compensation from the Commission, although Commission funds may be used to reimburse Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners for expenses incurred in performing Commission business if authorized by the Board. Nothing in this section 3.3 prevents a Member from providing compensation for its Commissioner or Alternate Commissioner for serving on the Board, if such compensation is authorized by such Member's governmental unit and by law. 3.4 Board Officers; Duties. At its first regular meeting on or after February 1 of each year, the Board will elect from its Commissioners a Chair, Vice Chair, Secretary, and Treasurer. All such officers will hold office for a term of one ( 1) year and until their successors have been qualified and duly elected by the Board. An officer may serve only while a member of the Board. A vacancy in an officer position will be filled from the Commissioner membership by Board selection for the remainder of the unexpired term of such office. The officers will have the duties provided in the Commission bylaws. 3.5 Quorum. A maJonty of Voting Commissioners from the nine Member c1t1es, i.e. representation of five Members, constitutes a quorum. Less than a quorum may adjourn a scheduled meeting. A simple majority of the quorum is required for the Board to act unless a higher number of votes is required by this Agreement or by law. If more than one Member has either a Board vacancy (both Commission and Alternate Commissioner) or its voting rights suspended, as provided herein, the number of Voting Commissioners required for a quorum will be reduced until the vacancy is filled or suspension lifted, as the case may be. 3 .6 Meetings. The Board will conduct meetings in accordance with the Minnesota Open Meeting Law (Minn. Stat., chap. 13D) and this section. (a)Regular Meetings. The Board will develop a schedule of its regular meetings. The Board will post the schedule on the Commission's website and provide a copy to each Member. The Secretary will maintain a copy of the schedule of regular meetings. The Chair and Vice Chair may cancel a meeting due to a lack of business items. The Secretary will make a good faith effort to notify Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners of a meeting cancellation. (b)Special Meetings. The Board may hold such special meetings as it may determine are necessary to conduct the business of the Commission. A special meeting may be called by the Chair or by any two Commissioners. In addition to the notice requirements provided in the Minnesota Open Meeting Law, the Secretary will provide notice of special meetings to the Commissioners and Alternate Commissioners. 6 BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 29 (c)Annual Organizational Meeting. The first regular meeting on or after February l of each year will constitute the annual organizational meeting of the Commission. (d)Rules of Procedure. The Board will conduct its meetings generally in accordance with the procedures set out in the most current version of Robert's Rules of Order without requiring strict conformance to its requirements. The Board may modify such rules as it determines is appropriate to facilitate the conducting of its business or adopt a different set of rules for its meetings. The Board may amend its rules from time to time as it determines is appropriate upon a majority vote of all Voting Commissioners. The Board may also waive one or more specific rules as it determines are necessary to facilitate the conducting of its business, except that statutory requirements may not be waived and voting authority provided hereunder may not be abrogated. SECTION IV POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE BOARD 4.1 Powers. The Board is authorized to exercise the powers in this section to carry out the purposes of the Commission. (a)Powers Granted. (1)It may contract with or employ such persons or entities as it deems necessary to accomplish its duties and powers. Any employee may be on a full-time, part- time, or consulting basis, as the Board determines. (2)It may contract for facilities, materials, supplies, and services to carry on its activities. (3)It may acquire necessary personal property to carry out its powers and its duties. (4)It will prepare, adopt, and implement a watershed management plan and capital improvement program that fulfills the requirements of Minn. Stat. § 103B.23 l and all other applicable laws and rules. In preparing said plan, the Board may consult with the engineering and planning staff of each Member and the Metropolitan Council and other public and private bodies to obtain and consider projections of land use, population growth, and other factors which are relevant to the protection and improvement of waters in the Watershed and mitigation of flood risk. (5)It will make necessary surveys or utilize other reliable surveys and data and develop projects to accomplish the purposes for which it is organized. (6)It may cooperate or contract with the State of Minnesota, or any subdivision thereof, any federal agency, or any public or private organization to accomplish the purposes for which it is organized. 7 BA295-l-930587. v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 30 (7)It may order any Member or Members to construct, clean, repair, alter, abandon, consolidate, reclaim or change the course or terminus of any ditch, drain, storm sewer, or water course, natural or artificial, within the Watershed. (8)It may order any Member or Members to acquire, operate, construct, or maintain dams, dikes, reservoirs and appurtenant works or other improvements necessary to implement the overall plan. (9)It will regulate, conserve, and control the use and management of storm and surface water and groundwater within the Watershed. (10)It may contract for or purchase such insurance as the Board deems necessary for the protection of the Commission. (11)It may establish and maintain devices acquiring and recording hydrological and water quality data within the Watershed. (12)It may enter upon lands to make surveys and investigations to accomplish the purposes of the Commission. The Commission shall be liable for actual damages resulting therefrom but every person who claims damages shall serve the chair or secretary of the Board with a notice of claim as required by Minn. Stat. § 466.05. (13)It will provide any Member with technical data or any other information of which the Commission has knowledge which will assist the governmental unit in preparing land use classifications or local water management plans within the Watershed. (14)It may provide legal and technical assistance in connection with litigation or other proceedings between one or more of its Members and any other political subdivision, commission, board or agency relating to the planning or construction of facilities to drain or pond storm waters or relating to water quality within the Watershed. The use of Commission funds for litigation will be only upon a favorable vote of a majority of Voting Commissioners. (15)It may accumulate reserve funds for the purposes herein mentioned and may invest funds of the Commission not currently needed for its operations, in the manner and subject to the laws of Minnesota applicable to statutory cities. (16)It may collect monies, subject to the provisions of this Agreement, from its Members, Hennepin County, and from any other source approved by a majority of its Board. (17)It may make contracts, incur expenses and make expenditures necessary and incidental to the effectuation of these purposes and powers and may disburse therefor in the manner hereinafter provided. 8 BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 31 (18)It will cause to be made an annual audit of the books and accounts of the Commission by a certified public accountant or the State Auditor, and will transmit a copy of the annual audit to BWSR and, on request, a Member. Its books, reports, and records will be available for and open to inspection by the Members at all reasonable times. (19)It will make and file a report to its Members at least once annually containing, at minimum, the following information: (i) the approved budget; (ii) a reporting of revenues; (iii) a reporting of expenditures; (iv) a financial audit report that includes a balance sheet, a classifications of revenues and expenditures, an analysis of changes in the final balances, and any additional statements considered necessary for full financial disclosure; (v) the status of all Commission projects and work within the Watershed; and (vi) the business transacted by the Commission and other matters which affect the interests of the Commission. (20)It may recommend changes in this Agreement to the Members. (21)It may exercise all other powers necessary and incidental to the implementation of the purposes and powers set forth herein and as outlined and authorized by Minn. Stat.§§ 103B.201 through 103B.251. (22)It will cooperate with the State of Minnesota, the Commissioner of Natural Resources and the Director of the Division of Waters, Soils and Minerals of the Department of Natural Resources in complying with the requirements of Minn. Stat., chap. 103G. (23)It will establish a procedure for establishing citizen or technical advisory committees and to provide other means for public participation. (b)Powers Reserved. The Board does not have any of the powers identified in this subsection (b ). Expressly identifying specific powers reserved is not intended to expand, by negative implication, the powers granted above to the Board. (1)Eminent Domain. The Commission does not have the power of eminent domain. Any easements or other interests in land necessary for any Board- ordered project will be acquired as provided below. (2)Real Property. The Commission may not own any interest in real property. All such interests, ifnecessary for any Board-ordered project, will be held in the name of a Member wherein said lands are located or another public or private entity, as the case may be. (3)Bonding. The Commission does not have the power to issue certificates, warrants or bonds. 9 BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 32 (4)Special Assessments. The Commission does not have the power to levy a special assessment upon any privately or publicly owned land. All such assessments, if deemed necessary as part of a Board-ordered project, will be levied by the Member wherein said lands are located and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429. The Commission does, however, have the power to require any Member to contribute the costs allocated or assessed according to other provisions of this Agreement. (c)Members. For the avoidance of doubt, each Member reserves the right to conductseparate or concurrent studies on any matter under study by the Commission. 4.2 Collection or Diversion of Waters. Each Member agrees that it will not directly or indirectly allow the collection or diversion of any additional surface water to the Mississippi River or its tributaries without adherence to all Commission rules and requirements. 4.3 Projects. (a)The Board may undertake projects, including those provided in its capital improvementprogram, in accordance with the Watershed Management Plan. Prior to ordering any project or otherwise holding a public hearing as may be required under section 1038.251, the Commission will secure from its engineers or some other competent person a report advising as to whether the proposed improvement is feasible, whether it will best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement, the estimated cost of the improvement, and the proposed allocation of costs, including whether one or more Members will incur any such costs. A resolution setting forth the order for any capital improvement project requires a favorable vote by two-thirds of Voting Commissioners. When ordering any project, the Commission resolution will further include an allocation of costs for the project and a designation of which Member(s) or entity will contract for and fund the project. Such resolution may also designate the engineers to prepare plans and specifications. Any Member aggrieved by the determination of the Board as to the allocation of the costs of a project has 30 days after the Commission resolution ordering the same to appeal said determination. Said appeal must be in writing and directed to the Board asking for arbitration. The determination of the Member's appeal will be referred to a Board of Arbitration. The Board of Arbitration will consist of three persons; one to be appointed by the Commission's Board, one to be appointed by the appealing Member, and the third to be appointed by the two persons so selected. In the event the two persons so selected do not appoint the third person within 15 days after their appointment, then the Chief Judge of the District Court of Hennepin County will have jurisdiction to appoint, upon application of either or both of the two earlier selected, the third person to the Board of Arbitration. The third person selected must not be a resident of any Member city and if appointed by the Chief Judge said person must be a registered professional engineer. The arbitrators' expenses and fees, together with the other expenses, not including counsel fees, incurred in the conduct of the arbitration will be divided equally between the Commission and the appealing Member. BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 33 Arbitration will be conducted in accordance with the Uniform Arbitration Act, Chapter 572B of Minnesota Statutes. (b)Projects Implemented by Members and Others. For any project that will be constructed by one or more Members on behalf of the Commission and reimbursed in whole or part by the Commission, to the extent authorized by the Commission, the Member(s) responsible for implementing the project and the Commission will enter into a cooperative agreement providing for all Commission-required terms and conditions related to the project and any such reimbursement. The Commission may also implement a project with a non-Member public or private entity in the same manner, if construction by such entities is deemed appropriate by the Commission. (c)Commission Projects. The Board may also undertake and contract for projects in the Commission's name, in accordance with the Watershed Management Plan and all applicable laws and regulations related to public procurement. Approval of Commission contracts for a capital improvement requires a favorable vote by two- thirds of Voting Commissioners. (d)County Funding. If the Commission proposes to certify all or any part of the cost of a capital improvement project for payment by Hennepin County via its levy or bonding authority, as set forth in Minn. Stat. § 103 B .251, all proceedings will be carried out in accordance with the provisions set forth in said section 103 B .251, as amended. (e)Contracts for Improvements. All contracts which are to be let as a result of the Commission's ordering of a project must comply with the requirements of laws applicable to contracts let by the respective party making such contract. The Commission does not have the authority to contract in its own name for any work for which a special assessment will be levied against any private or public property under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, chapter 429 or any city charter, and such contracts must be awarded by action of the governing body of a Member and must be in the name of said Member. This subsection does not preclude the Commission from proceeding under Minnesota Statutes, Section 103B.25 l or from otherwise proceeding under subsection 4.3(c) for projects that will not be specially assessed under chapter 429. All improvement contracts will be duly supervised by the party awarding said contract, provided, however, that the Commission is authorized to observe and review the work in progress and the Members agree to cooperate with the Commission staff in accomplishing the purposes of this Commission. Representatives of the Commission also have the right to enter upon the place or places where any improvement work is in progress for the purpose of making reasonable tests and inspections. Commission staff will report, advise and recommend to the Board on the progress of said work. (f)Land Acquisition. Because the Commission does not have the power to acquire real property, the Members agree that any and all easements or interests in land which are necessary for any project will be negotiated or condemned in accordance with all applicable laws by the Member wherein said lands are located, and each Member 11 BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 34 agrees to acquire the necessary easements or interests in such land upon order of the Commission to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement. All reasonable costs of said acquisition will be considered as a cost of the respective improvement. If a Member determines it is in the best interests of that Member to acquire additional lands in conjunction with the acquisition of lands for the Commission- ordered improvement, for some other purpose, the costs of said acquisition will not be included in the improvement costs of the ordered project and the Commission will not reimburse such costs. The Board in determining the allocation of the improvement costs may take into consideration the land use for which said additional lands are being acquired and may credit the acquiring Member for said land acquisition to the extent that it benefits the other Members of this Agreement. Any credits may be applied to the cost allocation of the improvement project under construction or the Board, if feasible and necessary, may defer said credits to a future project. If any Member refuses to negotiate or condemn lands as ordered by the Board, any other Member may negotiate or condemn outside of its corporate limits in accordance with applicable laws. All Members agree that they will not condemn or negotiate for land acquisition to pond or drain storm and surface waters within the corporate boundaries of another Member except upon order of the Board. The Commission has authority to establish land acquisition policies as a part of the overall Watershed Management Plan. The policies must be designed to equalize costs of land throughout the Watershed. 4.4 Emergency Projects. The Commission may perform emergency projects in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 1038.252. 4.5 Local Water Management Plans. (a)Development. Each Member agrees to develop and maintain a local water management plan, capital improvement program, and official controls as necessary to bring local water management into conformance with the Watershed Management Plan. The development and implementation of local water management plans will conform with all requirements of the Act, including Minn. Stat. § 1038.235 and Minn. R., part 8410.0160, as amended. In accordance with the Act, the Board will approve or disapprove each local plan or any parts of each plan. Every effort will be made by the Commission and all Members to coordinate local plans with the Watershed's overall plan, including planning for local plans at the same time the Watershed's overall plan is being developed. (b)Review. Each Member will submit its proposed local water management plan to the Metropolitan Council and the Board for review as required by Minn. Stat.§ 1038.235. The Board will consider any comments on local water management plans received from the Metropolitan Council and thereafter act on said plans in accordance with the Act. 4.6 Pollution Control and Water Quality. The Commission has the authority and responsibility to protect and improve water quality in the Watershed as this is one of the main purposes set forth 12 BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 35 in the Act. All Members agree that they will refuse to allow the drainage of sanitary sewage or industrial wastes onto any land or into any watercourse or storm sewer draining into Bassett Creek. The Board may investigate on its own initiative and will investigate upon petition of any Member all complaints relating to pollution of surface water or groundwater draining into or affecting Bassett Creek or its tributaries. Upon a finding that the creek or surface waters or groundwater are being polluted, the Board may order the Member to abate this nuisance and each Member agrees that it will take all reasonable action available to it under the law to alleviate the pollution and to assist in protecting and improving the water quality of surface water and groundwater in the Watershed. 4.7 Boundary Changes. Any changes to the boundaries of the watershed must be undertaken in accordance with Minn. Stat. § 103B.2 l 5, as it may be amended. 5.1 Generally. SECTIONV FINANCES (a)Authority. Commission funds may be expended by the Board in accordance with this Agreement and in accordance with the procedures as established by law and in the manner as may be determined by the Board. In no event will there be a disbursement of Commission funds without the signature of at least two Board members, one of whom must be the Treasurer or the Treasurer's Authorized Deputy Treasurer, except to the extent the Commission delegates general or specific authority to the Commission administrator to disburse Commission funds. The Treasurer is required to file with the Secretary of the Board a bond in the sum of at least $10,000 or such higher amount as determined by the Board. The Commission will pay the premium on said bond. (b)Depository. The Board will designate one or more national or state bank or trust companies, as authorized under Minnesota law, to receive deposits of public moneys and to act as depositories for the Commission funds. 5 .2 Member Contributions. Each Member agrees to contribute each year to a fund to be used for general administration purposes including, but not limited to: salaries, rent, supplies, development of the Watershed Management Plan, engineering and legal expenses, insurance, and bonds, and to purchase and maintain any personal property deemed necessary by the Commission in furtherance of its purposes and powers as articulated in this Agreement. Said funds may also be used for normal maintenance of any facilities, but any extraordinary maintenance or repair expense will be treated as an improvement cost and processed in accordance with section 5 .3 of this Agreement. Fifty percent (50%) of the annual budget for this general administration fund shall be allocated among the Members based upon the net tax capacity of all property within each Member's respective boundaries compared to the net tax capacity of all property within the Watershed, and the remaining fifty percent (50%) shall be allocated among the Members based on the total area within each Member's jurisdictional boundary that lies within the boundary of the Watershed compared to the total area of all property within the Watershed. In no event will any 13 BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 36 assessment hereunder require a contribution to exceed one-half of one percent of the net tax capacity within the Watershed. 5.3 Capital Project Funding. (a)Project Funding; Commission Contributions. In addition to any amount to be contributed by any Member or other private or public entity, as the case may be and as specified in the Board's resolution ordering the project, the Commission may, by a two-thirds vote of Voting Commissioners, proceed to fund all or any part of the cost of a capital improvement contained in the Watershed Management Plan pursuant to the authority and subject to the provisions set forth in Minn. Stat. § 103 B.251. (b)Maintenance Levy. The Commission may establish a maintenance fund to be used for normal and routine maintenance of a work of improvement constructed in whole or part with money provided by Hennepin County. As provided in Minn. Stat. § 103B.25 l, subd. 9, the Board may impose, with the county's consent, an ad valorem levy on all property located within the territory of the Watershed or a subwatershed unit. The levy will be certified, levied, collected, and distributed as provided in sections 1030.915 and 1030.921, as amended, and will be in addition to any other money levied and distributed by the county to the Commission. Mailed notice of any hearing required under the aforementioned statutes will be sent to the clerk of each Member municipality at least 30 days prior to the hearing. The proceeds of said maintenance levy will be deposited in a separate maintenance and repair account to be used only for the purpose for which the levy was made. 5.4 Budget; Member Assessments. (a)Adoption. On or before July 1 of each year, the Board will adopt a detailed budget for the ensuing year and decide upon the total amount necessary for the general fund. Budget approval requires a favorable vote by a majority of Voting Commissioners. The budget must not in any event require any Member to contribute annually in excess of one-half of one percent of the net tax capacity of all taxable property within the Watershed and within said Member's corporate boundaries. (b)Certification to Members. The secretary of the Board will certify the budget on or before July 1 to the clerk of each Member together with a statement of the proportion of the budget to be provided by each Member. (c)Member Review. The governing body of each Member agrees to review the budget, and the Board will upon written notice from any Member received prior to August 1, hear objections to the budget, and may, upon notice to all Members and after a hearing, modify or amend the budget, and then give notice to the Members of any and all modifications or amendments. Modifications or amendments to the original budget require a favorable vote by a majority of Voting Commissioners. 14 BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 37 (d)Member Assessments. Each Member agrees to provide the funds required by the approved budget and contemplated under section 5.2. If no objections are submitted to the Board, each Member agrees to provide the funds approved by the Board after the Board has conducted the process required in this Agreement. The schedule of payments by the Members will be determined by the Board in such a manner as to provide for an orderly collection of the funds needed. (e)Supplemental Budget. Upon notice and hearing, the Board by a favorable vote of a majority of Voting Commissioners may adopt a supplemental budget requiring additional payments by the Members within 60 days of its adoption but in no event will the budget require any Member to contribute in excess of one-half of one percent of the net tax capacity of all taxable property within the Watershed or within the Member's corporate boundaries in any one calendar year. 5.5 Cost Allocation for Capital Projects. All capital costs incurred by the Commission will be apportioned to the respective Members on any of the following bases: BA295-l-930587.v8 (a)County Levy. If the project is constructed and financed pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 103B.251, the Members understand and agree that said costs will be levied on all taxable property in the Watershed as set forth in said statute. (b)Negotiated Amount. Members who have lands in the subdistrict that is responsible for the capital improvement may negotiate an amount to be contributed by each Member thereof. (c)Tax Capacity and/or Total Area. (1)Fifty percent of all capital costs or the financing thereof will be apportioned to each Member on the basis of the net tax capacity of each Member within the boundaries of the Watershed each year to the total net tax capacity in the Watershed. (2)Fifty percent of all capital costs or the financing thereof will be apportioned to each Member on the basis of the total area of each Member within the boundaries of the Watershed each year to the total area in the Watershed. (3)Capital costs allocated under the 50% area/50% net tax capacity formula set forth above may be varied by a two-thirds vote of Voting Commissioners if: (i)any Member community receives a direct benefit from the capital improvement which benefit can be defined as a lateral as well as a trunk benefit, or (ii)the capital improvement provides a direct benefit to one or more Members which benefit is so disproportionate as to require in a sense of fairness a modification in the 50/50 formula. 15 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 38 (4)Credits to any Member for lands acquired by said Member to pond or store storm and surface water will be allowed against costs set forth in subsections (c)(l), (c)(2) and (c)(3) of this section. SECTION VI MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS 6.1 Term. This Agreement is effective as of January 1, 2025 and will remain in effect until January 1, 2033 unless terminated earlier as provided herein. The Members may agree to continue this Agreement as the preferred method for addressing their obligation to address surface water issues under law. 6.2 Liability. For the avoidance of doubt, the Commission is considered a single governmental unit for purposes of total liability for damages pursuant to Minn. Stat.§ 471.59, subd. la(b). 6.3 Termination. This Agreement may be terminated prior to January 1, 2033, by the unanimous consent of the Members. If the Agreement is to be so terminated, a notice of the intent to dissolve the Commission must be sent to BWSR and Hennepin County at least 90 days prior to the date of dissolution. 6.4 Dissolution. In addition to the manner provided in section 6.3 for terminating this Agreement, any Member may petition the Board to dissolve the Agreement. Following such petition, and upon 90 days' notice in writing to the clerk of each Member and to BWSR and Hennepin County, the Board will hold a public hearing and upon a favorable vote by a majority of Voting Commissioners, the Board may by resolution recommend that the Commission be dissolved. Said resolution will then be submitted to each Member and if ratified by three-fourths of the governing bodies of all Members within 60 days, said Board must dissolve the Commission, allowing a reasonable time to complete work in progress and to dispose of personal property owned by the Commission. 6.5 Distribution of Assets. If this Agreement is terminated and not replaced with a new agreement providing for the continued operation of the Commission, or if the Commission is dissolved, all property of the Commission will be sold and the proceeds thereof, together with monies on hand, will be distributed to the Members of the Commission. Such distribution of Commission assets will be made in proportion to the total contribution to the Commission as required by the last annual budget. [signature pages to follow] 16 BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 39 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Members have entered into this Agreement by action of their respective governing bodies effective as of January 1, 2025. CITY OF CRYSTAL By: Its: By: Its: Date: S-1 BA295-I-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 40 CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY By: Its: By: Its: Date: S-2 BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 41 CITY OF MEDICINE LAKE By: Its: By: Its: Date: S-3 BA295- l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 42 CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS By: Its: By: Its: Date: S-4 BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 43 CITY OF MINNETONKA By: Its: .By: Its: Date: BA295-l-930587.v8 S-5 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 44 CITY OF NEW HOPE By: Its: By: Its: Date: S-6 BA295-l-930587.v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 45 CITY OF PLYMOUTH By: Its: By: Its: Date: BA295-l-930587.v8 S-7 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 46 CITY OF ROBBINSDALE By: Its: By: Its: Date: S-8 BA295-l-930587 .v8 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 47 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By: Its: By: Its: Date: BA295-i-930587.v8 S-9 City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5e) Title: Approve Joint Powers Agreement for Bassett Creek Watershed Management Commission Page 48 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Consent agenda item: 5f Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations. Policy consideration: Do the civil penalties proposed follow the prescribed penalties set forth in section 3-107 of the St. Louis Park City Code related to the sale of alcoholic beverages to an underage person? Summary: Liquor compliance checks were conducted by the St. Louis Park Police Department on June 27, 2024, July 9, 2024 and Sept. 13, 2024. Under the direction of a police officer, an underage buyer attempted to purchase alcoholic beverages at licensed establishments in the city. Five (5) of the city’s 60 licensed establishments, identified in Exhibit A, failed the compliance check. Citations were issued in each case and forwarded to Hennepin County District Court for consideration of criminal penalties against the individual(s) who sold alcohol to the underage buyer at each establishment. This is standard practice in that the individual who sold or served the alcohol is responsible for that act and the business owner is subject to any civil penalties that result from the failure. The city is responsible for imposing civil penalties against the license holder. Minnesota statute 340A.415 limits civil penalty fees to a maximum of $2,000 for each violation. Additionally, the city code provides that the presumptive civil penalties for selling alcohol to an underage person are as follows: 1st Violation 2nd Violation within 3 years 3rd Violation within 3 years 4th Violation within 3 years $2,000 $2,000 and 1 - day suspension $2,000 and 3 - day suspension Revocation As per the provisions in city code, each license holder whose establishment failed the compliance check was informed of their options, including: •Accept the violation and pay the prescribed penalty, waiving the right to any appeal. •Appeal the violation at an administrative hearing with the city manager. •Appeal the violation directly to the city council at a public meeting. All five (5) establishments opted to accept their violations and serve their respective penalties. Additionally, each establishment was asked to participate in alcohol server training through the police department, free of charge. Financial or budget considerations: The proposed penalties are $2,000 for each establishment. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion, exhibit A, resolutions Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5f) Page 2 Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Discussion How many active liquor licenses does the city have? The city has 60 licensed establishments for the current license period ending Feb. 28, 2025. Does the police department offer training for license holders outside of the annual compliance check process? Yes, the police department will provide alcohol server training to any license holder, upon request. This is typically a group training provided to all employees at the establishment at one time. The annual compliance check program provides an opportunity to further educate license holders on best practices and strongly encourage ongoing training for their staff, particularly in a high turnover industry. Many license holders choose to work with one of the metro-area providers who can facilitate group training as well as individual training so that new staff can be trained prior to the start of work. The police department would not have the capacity to provide small scale, one-on-one training at the various establishments throughout the year. When is payment of the penalty due? Payment is due within 30 days of city council approval of the penalty. When are license suspensions served? City staff work with the establishment to select the date on which the license suspension will be served. The suspension applies only to the sale and service of alcohol, not food or non-alcoholic beverages. Once a suspension date is selected, the police department verifies compliance with the terms of the suspension. City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5f) Page 3 Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Exhibit A - List of establishments • Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 dba Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 at 6509 Walker Street • CSM Lodging Services, Inc. dba Marriot Minneapolis West, 9960 Wayzata Boulevard • T&N Restaurant Holdings, LLC dba Revival 8028 Minnetonka Boulevard • The Block Restaurant, LLC dba The Block Restaurant 7007 Walker Street • Yum!, Inc. dba Yum! Kitchen and Bakery 4000 Minnetonka Boulevard City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5f) Page 4 Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Resolution No. 24-____ Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on June 27, 2024, at Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282 dba Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282, 6509 Walker Street Whereas on June 27, 2024, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor, occurred at Frank Lundberg American Legion Post 282, 6509 Walker Street in St. Louis Park; and Whereas the liquor license violation was the first occurrence at this establishment within three years; and Whereas the license holder has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a violation of the sections 3-73 through 3-75 of the St. Louis Park City Code; and Whereas the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed to accept the administrative penalty as set by the city manager and as approved by the city council, Now therefore be it resolved that a civil penalty of $2,000 is hereby imposed on the license holder pursuant to St. Louis Park City Code section 3-75 and section 3-107. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5f) Page 5 Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Resolution No. 24-____ Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on July 9, 2024, at CSM Lodging Services, Inc. dba Marriot Minneapolis West, 9960 Wayzata Blvd. Whereas on July 9, 2024, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor, occurred at CSM Lodging Services, Inc. dba Marriot Minneapolis West, 9960 Wayzata Blvd. in St. Louis Park; and Whereas the liquor license violation was the first occurrence at this establishment within three years; and Whereas the license holder has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a violation of the sections 3-73 through 3-75 of the St. Louis Park City Code; and Whereas the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed to accept the administrative penalty as set by the city manager and as approved by the city council, Now therefore be it resolved that a civil penalty of $2,000 is hereby imposed on the license holder pursuant to St. Louis Park City Code section 3-75 and section 3-107. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5f) Page 6 Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Resolution No. 24-____ Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on July 9, 2024, at T&N Restaurant Holdings, LLC dba Revival, 8028 Minnetonka Blvd. Whereas on July 9, 2024, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor, occurred at T&N Restaurant Holdings, LLC dba Revival, 8028 Minnetonka Boulevard in St. Louis Park; and Whereas the liquor license violation was the first occurrence at this establishment within three years; and Whereas the license holder has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a violation of the sections 3-73 through 3-75 of the St. Louis Park City Code; and Whereas the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed to accept the administrative penalty as set by the city manager and as approved by the city council, Now therefore be it resolved that a civil penalty of $2,000 is hereby imposed on the license holder pursuant to St. Louis Park City Code section 3-75 and section 3-107. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5f) Page 7 Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Resolution No. 24-____ Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on July 9, 2024, at The Block Restaurant, LLC dba The Block Restaurant, 7007 Walker Street Whereas on July 9, 2024, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor, occurred at The Block Restaurant, LLC dba The Block Restaurant, 7007 Walker Street in St. Louis Park; and Whereas the liquor license violation was the first occurrence at this establishment within three years; and Whereas the license holder has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a violation of the sections 3-73 through 3-75 of the St. Louis Park City Code; and Whereas the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed to accept the administrative penalty as set by the city manager and as approved by the city council, Now therefore be it resolved that a civil penalty of $2,000 is hereby imposed on the license holder pursuant to St. Louis Park City Code section 3-75 and section 3-107. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5f) Page 8 Title: Resolutions imposing civil penalties for liquor license violations Resolution No. 24-____ Resolution imposing civil penalty for liquor license violation on July 9, 2024, at Yum!, Inc. dba Yum! Kitchen and Bakery, 4000 Minnetonka Blvd. Whereas on July 9, 2024, a liquor license violation, sale of liquor to a minor, occurred at Yum!, Inc. dba Yum! Kitchen and Bakery, 4000 Minnetonka Blvd. in St. Louis Park; and Whereas the liquor license violation was the second occurrence at this establishment within three years; and Whereas the license holder has stipulated that the incident occurred and was a violation of the sections 3-73 through 3-75 of the St. Louis Park City Code; and Whereas the license holder was informed of the civil penalty process and has agreed to accept the administrative penalty as set by the city manager and as approved by the city council, Now therefore be it resolved that a civil penalty of $2,000 and a 1-day suspension are hereby imposed on the license holder pursuant to St. Louis Park City Code section 3-75 and section 3-107. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 21, 2024: Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Consent agenda item: 5g Executive summary Title: Temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license – MATTER Recommended action: Motion to approve a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for MATTER at 7005 Oxford Street on Nov. 15, 2024. Policy consideration: Does the applicant meet the requirements for issuance of a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license? Summary: MATTER applied for a temporary on-sale intoxicating liquor license for a fundraising gala event taking place on Nov. 15, 2024. The fundraiser will be held at MATTER’s warehouse location on Oxford Street from 5:30 – 11:00 p.m. MATTER’s “Stand Up for A Cause” fundraiser is a celebration where people can learn more about MATTER as well as enjoy a night of entertainment. The organization is working with Kitchen & Rail who will oversee the service of alcoholic beverages. The police department completed a background investigation on the principals and found no reason to deny the temporary license. The applicant meets all requirements for the issuance of the license and has secured the appropriate insurance liability coverage. Staff recommend approval of the temporary license. Financial or budget considerations: The fee for a temporary liquor license is $100 per day of the event. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: None. Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Discussion item: 1 Executive summary Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion – Wards 1, 2 and 3 Recommended action: Review the draft gateway plans and provide staff with questions and feedback. Policy consideration: How should the light rail station areas and West Excelsior Boulevard redevelop over the next 20 years? Summary: The Arrive + Thrive project has resulted in drafts of four small area plans for gateway areas within the community to guide decisions about development, investment and how the areas are used. The process includes updates to the existing plans for the three METRO Green Line Extension light rail stations: Beltline Boulevard, Wooddale Avenue and Louisiana Avenue, and the creation of a new plan to guide investments along Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100. The full draft of Arrive + Thrive has been completed following 18 months of community, planning commission and city council engagement. The resulting gateway plans will provide policy guidance and implementation actions to support investments that align with the community’s interests, the city’s strategic priorities and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This report provides an overview of the complete draft of the gateway plans. The city council is asked to review the draft document and consider the discussion questions listed in the report during their review. Staff will be presenting the draft plans at the study session and identify one or two outcomes for each gateway for discussion. Financial or budget considerations: Direction from the council, along with previous input from community engagement events and planning commission, will shape the implementation actions drafted within the final Arrive + Thrive plans. Some of these actions will require staff time, city resources and possibly dedicated funding to implement over the next 20 years. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion, Draft of Arrive + Thrive Gateway Plans, phase 1 engagement summary, phase 2 engagement summary, phase 3 engagement summary Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion – Wards 1, 2 and 3 Discussion Background: Project purpose The Arrive + Thrive project is an opportunity for the city to update plans for the METRO Green Line Extension light rail station areas as well as create a plan for west Excelsior Boulevard. Members of the project’s community advisory group identified these areas as “gateways” into St. Louis Park – activity centers where people enter the city, pass through and congregate throughout their daily lives. This project created a consistent framework for planning within all four gateway areas, as well as identified implementation strategies to achieve these plans. The process around Arrive + Thrive also provides an opportunity for these plans to effectively incorporate the city’s strategic priorities into the plans and implementation. Process overview The Arrive + Thrive planning process included technical analysis, stakeholder coordination and public engagement to inform the development of the plan. The following graphic illustrates the planning process and engagement efforts: Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion – Wards 1, 2 and 3 Community Engagement Community engagement provides opportunities for members of the St. Louis Park community to participate in the decision-making processes. The city recognizes that the four gateways are fixtures in the community, serving mobility, economic development and housing needs. Community input directed the trajectory of the project throughout the process. Summaries of each phase of engagement are found on the project website and as attachments to this report. Phase 1: May and June 2023 The first phase of engagement was held in May and June of 2023. The purpose of this phase was to inform community members of the project and learn about individuals’ experiences in the gateway areas. There were two main engagement activities during this phase: an online interactive map and survey and an in-person open house event. In total, around 150 community members participated in phase 1 of engagement. Phase 2: October – December 2023 The second phase of engagement for Arrive + Thrive shared the big ideas developed for each gateway and gathered feedback from the community to refine them. The big ideas were identified using community input from phase 1, along with technical analysis of the existing conditions for each gateway and the current station area plans. Phase 2 used a variety of in- person events and an online survey to confirm the big ideas and gather specific input to shape the implementation actions of each big idea. Phase 3: May 2024 The third phase of engagement for Arrive + Thrive shared the recommended planning approach for each gateway. The intent of phase 3 was to present these ideas to the public, reaffirm community support for this approach, and identify community priorities for implementation. This phase included an in-person event to celebrate the final phase of the project and online engagement. The planning commission participated in the process by providing guidance for the first phase of engagement in February 2023. The planning commission and city council both discussed the “big ideas” presented in phase 2 of engagement in October 2023. Finally, as a part of phase 3 of engagement, the planning commission reviewed the draft illustrated plans and outcomes in May 2024. Present considerations: The project team has developed a full set of plans for each Arrive + Thrive gateway, which is attached to this staff report for your review. Each gateway plan is organized to start with an introduction and current considerations within the gateway, followed by an illustrative plan and plan outcomes. Each outcome is further described by its features, impact analysis and related implementation actions needed to achieve the outcome. A list of all the gateway plans’ outcomes is below. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Page 4 Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion – Wards 1, 2 and 3 As you read through the gateway plans and their related outcomes consider the following: 1. How does this outcome relate to the strategic priorities of the city? 2. Are there any unintended impacts resulting from this outcome that should be addressed within the gateway plan? 3. Are there any missing actions, from the city, other agencies, developers or community members, that would be needed to achieve this outcome? 4. Does the timeline of implementation make sense for the priority and feasibility of the outcome? Beltline Gateway illustrative plan and outcomes A. 35th Street + Raleigh Avenue design B. Reinvestment + adaptive reuse opportunities C. Mixed use + residential redevelopment D. New open space, stormwater + Bass Lake connection E. Roadway network updates F. Park Glen Road extension Wooddale Gateway illustrative plan and outcomes A. Public realm enhancements B. Bike + pedestrian connections C. Redevelopment along 36th Street D. Micro Center + Burlington Coat Factory redevelopment E. New park + open spaces F. Roadway connections G. Highway 100 bike + pedestrian bridge H. Walker Street realignment Louisiana Gateway illustrative plan and outcomes A. Oxford Street design B. Minnehaha Creek connection C. Monitor Street redevelopment D. South Oak Hill Neighborhood redevelopment opportunities E. Oxford Street mixed use redevelopment F. Pedestrian street connection G. South railroad spur bikeway H. Realignment of Methodist Hospital access I. Cambridge Street extension + pedestrian connection J. Blue infrastructure + stormwater management Excelsior Gateway illustrative plan and outcomes A. Brunswick Avenue + Zarthan Avenue access changes B. Brunswick Avenue bikeway C. Public realm enhancements D. Party City redevelopment opportunities E. Jessen Press redevelopment opportunities F. Reuse opportunities + shared parking district Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Page 5 Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion – Wards 1, 2 and 3 G. West Excelsior Boulevard roadway design During the special study session, staff will lead the council through an exercise to identify one or two outcomes to discuss during the study session. Council members are encouraged to send additional thoughts or feedback on the gateway plans onto staff after the meeting. Next steps: The city council discussion will help to inform any fine-tuning or significant changes needed to the plan. City staff will then bring a final draft to the planning commission and city council for final consideration and acceptance. The plan will be available as a PDF initially. City staff intend to adapt it into an interactive website that staff can continue to update and show the city’s progress. Once the gateway plans have been accepted, planning staff will work with other departments, the planning commission, and city council on various implementation actions moving forward. This report summarizes engagement events and community feedback collected from surveys and in-person events. The Arrive + Thrive Open House from June 27th, an online survey, and an online interactive map are included. Over 150 community members have participated. August 2023 PHASE 1 ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY Place a Pin! This needs attention I have an idea I have a concern I like this Legend: Green Line Extension Bike Routes & Trails Louisiana Gatew a y Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Walker St Cedar L a k e Tr ail CreeksidePark Methodist Hospital St. Louis Park High School Loffler Companies JorvigPark LouisianaOaks Park Oxford St Brunswick Ave L ouisia n a A v e M innehahaCreekPINK BLUE PURPLE GREEN Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 6 Arrive + Thrive Phase 1: Issues and Opportunities When: May 1 to July 14, 2023 Place a Pin! This needs attention I have an idea I have a concern I like this Legend: Green Line Extension Bike Routes & Trails Louisiana Gatew a y Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Walker St Cedar L a k e Tr ail CreeksidePark Methodist Hospital St. Louis Park High School Loffler Companies JorvigPark LouisianaOaks Park Oxford St Brunswick Ave L ouisia n a A v e M innehaha CreekCOLOR COLOR COLOR COLOR Goals of the Last Plan Developed in 2003, the Elmwood Area Land Use, Transit, and Transportation Study document provides a set of Elmwood Area (now Wooddale) planning principles, a range of recommendations, and land use guiding recommendations. Goals from that plan include: Redevelop opportunity sites for residential, office, and mixed-uses in line with future transit developments. Maintain or redevelop opportunity sites to support current and future job sectors. Redevelop opportunity sites for multimodal transit developments, such as park and rides. Improve pedestrian and bicycle accommodations to current and future amenities. Enhance the public realm by way of streetscape and open space improvements. Population Between 2010 and 2020, the population in census tracts in the Wooddale Station Gateway area grew by between -6.3 percent and 22.4 percent (10.5 percent citywide). Housing In census tracts in the Wooddale Station Gateway area, the percentage of renter-occupied housing is between 12.0 percent and 71.9 percent (41.9 percent citywide). Employment & Income Between 2010 and 2020, the median household income in census tracts in the Wooddale Station Gateway area grew between 16.6 percent and 63.0 percent (39.7 percent citywide). Mobility 63% 60% 56% Percentage of jobs in transportation, warehousing, and utilities Percentage of jobs in other services Percentage of jobs in public administration Wooddale Station 1 5 6 4 3 7 9 11 12 2 1 Highway 7 interchange and improvements, 2011 2 Wooddale Ave bikeway improvements, 2020 3 Via Sol apartments, 2022 4 Union Park Flats, 2024 5 Village in the Park condominiums and townhomes, 2006 6 36th Street reconstruction, 2022 7 OlyHi mixed-use development, 2025 8 Towerlight senior housing, 2012 9 Hoigaard Village mixed-use development, 2007 10 The Elmwood apartments, 2019 11 Firestation 1, 2011 12 Arbor House apartments, 2023 Wooddale Station Gateway 8% 47% 46% Percentage of households in the study area with two or more vehicles. Percentage of households in the study area with one vehicle. Percentage of households in the study area with no vehicles. Lake StWo o d d a l e A v e 36th St Hwy 100Hwy 7 Area Investments Environment The greater Minnehaha Creek Watershed is a critical natural resource in the Wooddale Gateway area. Future developments should use best practices to promote positive stewardship of the watershed. 8 10 The first phase of the Arrive + Thrive Gateway Planning process set out to inform the community of the project, share its purpose and process and learn about individuals’ experiences in the study area. Engagement activities were targeted at learning these experiences across each of the four gateways. Feedback will inform the refinement of goals for the four gateways and solidify the issues and opportunities analysis. A number of tactics were used to promote the open house and community survey, including: • City and neighborhood social media accounts (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, NextDoor) • GovDelivery emails to existing subscribers • Yards signs placed in the study area • Attendance at community events • Flyers and postcards located throughout the community There were two primary methods for collecting input for the first phase of engagement. An open house on June 27th at the Municipal Service Center provided an opportunity to gather in- person with community members and gather feedback. The online engagement opportunities were available from May 1 to July 14, 2023, providing an opportunity for the community to learn about and engage with the project. Activities at the open house included the following. • Project overview and context • Push pin activity: locate the places that need attention, have something you like, or you have a concern about • Priorities activity: identify the priorities that are most important to you for each gateway • Create a headline: what will they be writing about after implementation The input gathered at the open house was included within the online survey summary in the following pages. Phase 1 purpose Phase 1 promotion Phase 1 events Join the conversation! What’s next for gateways into St. Louis Park? Help inform future investments and priorities at the three METRO Green Line light rail stations and West Excelsior Boulevard. bit.ly/slp-arrive-and-thrive THRIVE+ARRIVE ST. LOUIS PARK GATEWAY PLANNING 2Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 7 Online community survey When: May 1 - July 14, 2023 20 Questions, open-ended and multiple choice 146 Participants The average household size represented is between 2-3 individuals.(147 respondents) The community is drawn to the study area(s) because: The community is excited about: The community is concerned about: Race and Ethnicity Gender LGBTQ+ Community Most respondents (over 75%) live in a single unit detatched house. (144 respondents) Almost 10% of respondents identified as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. (136 respondents) • They live and/or work nearby • They enjoy outdoor activities and look forward to future trail connections • They are looking forward to using the new light rail line • They are interested in future development and improvements • Trails and connections to open space for pedestrians and cyclists; improved walkability • Connections to Downtown by light rail • New residential and mixed-use development, and overall neighborhood revitalization • Environmental restoration and improved biodiversity • Limited infrastructure and traffic from new development • Lack of neighborhood cohesiveness and connectivity • Pedestrian and cyclist safety • Lack of senior and affordable housing opportunities No(90.44%) Yes(9.56%)Other(2.24%) Female(58.210%) Non-Binary(1.49%) Male(38.06%) Other(4.3%)Black(0.75%) Hispanic or Latino(3.76%) White(93.98%) American Indian or Alaska Native (3.01%) 3Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 8 The average household size represented is between 2-3 individuals.(147 respondents) Over half of the respondent’s households take home over 118,000 dollars annually. (121 respondents) Over 70% of respondents do not have any children in their household. (143 respondents) Most of the respondents are between 31 and 69 years old. (141 Respondents) What is your relationship to St. Louis Park? (Select all that apply) Household size Other key takeaways: Home type Homeowners Vs. renters Most respondents (over 75%) live in a single unit detatched house. (144 respondents) Over 95% of respondents own their home. (143 respondents) • Connections to the open spaces within the study area could be improved. 20% of respondents did not agree that these spaces were well-maintained and accessible. Over 30% were neutral. • Over 45% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed they could find housing within the study area that met their needs with access to services they wanted. Around 17% did not agree. 0 - 35,199 58,650 - 70,379 35,200 - 58,649 70,380 - 89,399 89,400 - 118,199 118,200 + Household income Household age 100500 150 I live here I go to school here I work here I visit friends and family here I shop and go to restaurants here Other 20%40%0%60% 25 500 75 0 - 5 11-14 6-10 15-17 18-30 31-49 50-69 70+ Own(96.5%) Rent(3.5%) Condo(21.8%) Single Unit Detached House(21.8%) Apartment (2.78%) Townhouse(6.25%) 4-6(21.1%) 1(21.8%) 2-3(57%) 4Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 9 Interactive map When: 1 May - 14 July 2023 1 map with 4 location identifiers 57 participants, 152 contributions This map of St. Louis Park highlights the four Gateway study areas - Louisiana Station Gateway, Wooddale Station Gateway, Beltline Station Gateway, and Excelsior Boulevard Gateway. There were 58 ideas, 48 concerns, 17 likes, and 29 notices for attention added to the map. Overall, there are opportunities to create separate identities for each of the study areas while developing a cohesive plan. Improvements can be made to pedestrian and cyclist connections throughout the study areas - wayfinding, greenways, pocket parks, sidewalks and bike lanes, and crosswalks. There is also a need to connect the neighborhoods and amenities on the north and south sides of the new light rail tracks and Highway 7. 5Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary NNTS Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 10 Louisiana Station Gateway Wooddale Station Gateway Beltline Station Gateway West Excelsior Boulevard Gateway • A shuttle service from light rail stop to the Hospital • Ensuring protection of and highlighting the creek as part of future development • Additional neighborhood amenities on the north side of the new light rail stop such as pocket parks, • Additional greenways and improved tree canopy for pedestrians and cyclists • Traffic is very congested in this area • Highway overpasses are not pedestrian friendly • The existing bike lanes are not separated enough • There is an opportunity here to improve the north side of the study area and create a destination for restaurants and shops • Bass Lake Park is popular within the area and the community would like greenways to connect to the regional parkway networks • There is an opportunity to add smaller-scale affordable housing options within this area • A lot of this study area is industrial and could be redeveloped in a unique way • Pedestrian routes need safer sidewalks and crosswalks • This corridor should be more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly with improved crosswalks and separation from traffic • Parking should be considered in redevelopment • The intersection of West Excelsior Boulevard and Wooddale Avenue is congested and “messy” • The new retail spaces should prioritize small, locally-owned businesses Interactive Map Key Takeaways 6Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 11 This report summarizes engagement events and community feedback collected from surveys and in-person events conducted in phase 2. Activities included pop-up events, focus group discussions, a walking tour, business engagement, and an online survey. Over 200 community members have participated, with impressions with an additional 150. February 2024 PHASE 2 ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY What should the Burlington Coat Factory Site look like in the future? The Wooddale Gateway has seen a lot of redevelopment in recent years, but there are a few sites that remain opportunities for redevelopment. What should that redevelopment look like? Specifically, the larger Burlington Coat Factory/Microcenter site is a large opportunity for redevelopment. What scale of redevelopment should be explored? How can connections be made through the site? Share your priorities for redevelopment of the site! Identify the top five redevelpment features that are most important to you. With the five marbles provided to you, drop them in your top priorities, you can place more than one marble in a jar. New multi-family residential developmentAdditional office employment opportunitiesAdditional retail and shopping opportunitiesAdditional open space and public gathering spacesLarger scale development - one large building structureNew roadways through the site to improve connectionsNew bicycle and pedestrian connections through the sitePublic uses or gathering spacesOtherSmaller scale development - additional smaller buildingsSpecial study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 12 Arrive + Thrive Phase 2: Gateway Big Ideas When: September to December 2024 The second phase of the Arrive + Thrive Gateway Planning process shared the big ideas developed for each gateway and gathered feedback from the community. Four big ideas were shared for each gateway, representing the public input. Engagement activities were targeted at gathering feedback to refine these ideas. Feedback will be used to guide the development of the gateway plans and the identification of implementation actions. A number of tactics were used to promote the open house and community survey, including: • City and neighborhood social media accounts (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, NextDoor) • GovDelivery emails to existing subscribers • Yards signs placed in the study area • Attendance at community events There were two primary methods for collecting input during the second phase. A variety of in-person events provided opportunities to gather feedback, as identified below. The online survey was available from October to early December of 2023, providing an opportunity for the community to learn about the big ideas and share their ideas. In-person engagement activities included: • Susan Lindgren Fall Festival Pop-up Event • Howl-o-Ween Pop-up Event • Steel Toe Pop-up Event • Goblins on Ice Pop-up Event • West Excelsior Walking Tour • West Excelsior Business Survey • Louisiana Gateway Business + Property Owner Focus Group • Era on Excelsior Pop-up Event • Hoigaard Village Pop-up Events (3) The input gathered through the in-person and online engagement is summarized in the following pages. Phase 2 purpose Phase 2 promotion Phase 2 events Join the conversation! What’s next for gateways into St. Louis Park? Help inform future investments and priorities at the three METRO Green Line light rail stations and West Excelsior Boulevard. bit.ly/slp-arrive-and-thrive THRIVE+ARRIVE ST. LOUIS PARK GATEWAY PLANNING 2Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 13 Wooddale Gateway SummaryWooddale Gateway Summary •Susan Lindgren Fall Festival Pop-up:October 2, 2023 from 4 to 6pm, 30participants and an additional 20+impressions •Howl-o-Ween Pop-up: October 15,2023 from 12 to 3pm, 40 participantsand an additional 20+ impressions •Hoigaard Village Pop-ups: November28 and 30 and December 1, 2023, 20participants and an additional 30+impressions •Online Survey Wooddale gateway events Wooddale Gateway big ideasWooddale Gateway big ideas Redevelopment opportunities Green corridors Circulation Highway 100 The Wooddale Gateway has experienced a lot of redevelopment in recent years. A few sites still remain as redevelopment opportunities. How should redevelopment be guided for these remaining sites (e.g., Burlington Coat Factory and MicroCenter)? The transportation network within the Wooddale Gateway has seen a number of investments over the last decade. However, there are additional opportunities to improve access to destinations within the Gateway. Current development within the Wooddale Gateway includes large areas of impervious surface with limited tree canopy. What improvements can be made to green the gateways and better connect to existing resources and increase green spaces/ trees? Highway 100 creates physical barrier for connecting the Wooddale Station to areas to the East. How can the existing overpass at 36th Street be improved and is an additional bike/ pedestrian crossing needed to the south? Burlington Former Redevelopment Opportunities Green Corridor Opportunities Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Opportunities Legend: Wooddale Station Ped/Bike Only W o o d d a l e A v e Hwy 7 Cedar L a k e Tr ail Lake St34th St Webster Park Lilac Park 36th St Cambridge StAlabama AveBrunswick AveHwy 100St. Louis Park Central Community 3Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 14 Wooddale Gateway SummaryWooddale Gateway Summary Redevelopment opportunities: What uses would you like to see with redevelopment of remaining redevelopment opportunities? Circulation: What connections need to be made for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians? Where can’t you get today that you wish you could? Green corridors: How and where should additional greenspace or vegetation be added within the gateway? Highway 100: Are improvements needed to cross Highway 100? In-person event feedback: •Preferences for additional shopping and retail opportunities •Additional multi-family residential development preferred for residential growth •Enhancements and additional public uses and gathering spaces are desire •The community values the current housing styles in the gateway In-person event feedback: •Support for increased open spaces and public gathering spaces throughout the gateway •Opportunities to increase public spaces and improve the public realm along 36th and Wooddale In-person event feedback: •While existing infrastructure is appreciated, continued enhancements to bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure is desired •Support for new roadway connections throughout the gateway •Support for the identification of Brunswick as a future bikeway In-person event feedback: •General support for the addition of a new bicycle/pedestrian overpass of Highway 100 •Community members highlighted the barrier created by Highway 100 between housing and retail destinations Online survey feedback: •Desire for mixed-use development, emphasizing high-density residential options, live-work spaces, and a variety of businesses •Notable support for retaining Micro Center •Suggestions diversity of business offerings •Others advocated for lower-density development to manage traffic issues Online survey feedback: •Desire for more trees throughout the gateway, especially as a buffer to Highway 100 •Support for park space with trails, trees, water and native plants •Suggestions or the conversion of parking lot space for more vegetation and the use of permeable materials Online survey feedback: •The need for improved biking and walking infrastructure was emphasized •Desire for new routes to connect gateway to Target area and Excelsior •Desire for increased parking at the Wooddale Station Online survey feedback: •Need for improvements to cross Highway 100 was identified •Suggested improvements included widened path, wildlife crossings, vegetated medians, and protected bike lanes 4Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 15 Beltline Gateway Summary Beltline Gateway Summary •Goblins on Ice Pop-up: October27, 2023 from 5:45 to 7:15pm, 5participants and an additional 30+impressions •Steele Toe Pop-up: October 22, 2023from 2 to 5 pm, 20 participants and anadditional 30+ impressions •Hoigaard Village Pop-ups: November28 and 30 and December 1, 2023, 20participants and an additional 30+impressions •Online Survey Beltline gateway events Beltline Gateway Big IdeasBeltline Gateway Big Ideas Redevelopment Opportunities Green Corridors Circulation CSAH 25 Improvements The Beltline Gateway is home to a variety of residential, commercial, and industrial uses that have been active for many years. The recent Corsa and Risor mixed use developments along Beltline Boulevard serve as examples for the potential development vision and could serve as catalysts for investments throughout the Gateway. The transportation network within the Beltline Gateway has seen a number of investments over the last decade. However, there are additional opportunities to improve access to destinations within the Gateway. Current development within the Beltline Gateway includes large areas of impervious surface with limited tree canopy. What improvements can be made to green the gateways and better connect to existing resources (e.g., Bass Lake) and increase green spaces/trees? There are active changes and investments to County Highway 25 and Minnetonka Boulevard. How should the city continue to push the vision for corridor improvements with these changes and redevelopment? Melrose Corsa Mixed-Use Risor Mixed-Use 36th St Beltline Station County Hi g h w a y 2 5 Beltline BlvdCedar L a k e Tr ailHwy 100Minnetonka Blvd Carpenter Park St. Louis Park City Hall Bass Lake Bass Lake Park Nordic Legend: 35th & Raleigh Redevelopment Opportunities Station Area Redevelopment Opportunities Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Opportunities 5Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 16 Beltline Gateway SummaryBeltline Gateway Summary Redevelopment opportunities: If redevelopment occurs within the 35th Street and Raleigh Avenue area, how could existing buildings be reused or what new uses would you like to see introduced in the area? Circulation: What connections need to be made for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians? Where can’t you get today that you wish you could? Green corridors: How and where should additional green space or vegetation be added within the gateway? CSAH 25 Improvements: What additional improvements are needed along County Highway 25? For example, additional greenspace will be added with the Minnetonka Boulevard realignment – what else is In-person event feedback: •Additional restaurants and beverage establishments highlighted as the most desired new use •Enhancements and additional public uses and gathering spaces are desire •Opportunities to increase housing costs in the gateway In-person event feedback: •Appreciation for the existing infrastructure and opportunities to access natural spaces •Desires for increased access and interaction opportunities •Bass Lake is highly valued, maintaining this resource and the views to the lake should be a priority In-person event feedback: •Mixed feedback regarding access to transit service, sidewalks and trails, with some identifying a desire to continue to enhance multimodal infrastructure •Positive feedback for the roadway network improvements identified In-person event feedback: •Appreciation for current planning and design efforts for Minnetonka Boulevard •Desire for enhanced green spaces and safe crossings of CSAH 25 Online survey feedback: •Preferences for new development and reuse of existing buildings to allow for redevelopment •New development preferences cited the success of nearby mixed-use development •The reuse of buildings was emphasized to maintain affordability Online survey feedback: •Replacement of surface parking with green spaces and outdoor spaces •Desire for enhanced natural elements and improved access •Support for active and passive outdoor spaces, including bird watching and adult workout spaces Online survey feedback: •Suggestions for bike and pedestrian facility improvements throughout the gateway •Desire for increased access and connection to natural resources and existing transportation infrastructure •Opportunities for green transportation infrastructure identified, including EV charging stations Online survey feedback: •Desire for increase safety and a more welcoming environment for bikers and pedestrians along Minnetonka Boulevard •Increased focus on green spaces and parks •Opportunities for increased signage and wayfinding 6Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 17 Louisiana Gateway SummaryLouisiana Gateway Summary •Business + Property Owner FocusGroup: October 30, 2023, 11participants with outreach to anadditional 30+ businesses •Era on Excelsior Pop-up: November15, 2023 from 3:45 to 5 pm, 10participants and an additional 20+impressions •Online Survey Wooddale gateway events Primary Redevelopment Opportunities Additional Redevelopment Opportunity Areas Affordable Housing Opportunity Area Legend: Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Walker St Cedar L a k e Tr ail Creekside Park Methodist St. Louis Park Loffler Jorvig Park Louisiana Oaks Park Oxford St Oxford St Brunswick Ave L o uisia n a A v e Louisiana Gateway Big IdeasLouisiana Gateway Big Ideas Redevelopment Opportunities Oxford Street Activation Affordable Housing Circulation There are a variety of existing developments within the gateway. How should investments be guided to support the transit station and what uses would support the existing employment within the area? What types of redevelopment would you like to see in the gateway? The Meadowbrook/Era development provides affordable housing options within the community. How should affordable housing be preserved and what investments or improvements should be considered? How should affordable housing be maintained in the gateway? Oxford Street is the main east/west street connecting businesses and destinations within the gateway. Who can the street level of developments on Oxford Street be activated to promote movement, understanding that different modes use the roadway. What development or roadway improvements can be made to enhance Oxford Street into a vibrant corridor for people moving by all modes? The existing roadway network connects existing destinations; however, there are opportunities to improve the connections between uses for pedestrians, bicyclists, and vehicles. 7Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 18 Louisiana Gateway SummaryLouisiana Gateway Summary Redevelopment opportunities: If redevelopment occurs within the gateway, what uses would you like to see? Oxford Street Activation: What development or roadway improvements can be made to enhance Oxford Street into a vibrant corridor for people moving by all modes? Affordable Housing: How should affordable housing be maintained in the gateway? Circulation: What connections need to be made for vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians? Where can’t you get today that you wish you could? In-person event feedback: •Support for change in uses, understand that the existing business mix is not ideal with the proximity to the Louisiana Station •Support for mixed-use development and the addition of service based uses, including restaurants, beverage establishments, and fitness •Desire to create a destination at Louisiana and give people are reason to stop In-person event feedback: •Existing affordable housing in the gateway is valued in the community with desires to preserve affordability •Future investments in increased multimodal connections, access to light rail, and new employment opportunities will benefit existing housing In-person event feedback: •Oxford Street provides a key function for existing industrial uses, providing freight connections. This factor must be considered as land uses and the roadway change •Future land use changes along Oxford will open opportunities to change the experience for all users In-person event feedback: •The South Oak Hill neighborhood lacks connection to the station area and future redevelopment opportunities •Pedestrian connections between the Louisiana Station and Methodist are very important •Future conversion of the south rail spur to a trail connection is desired Online survey feedback: •Support for redevelopment centered around shopping, coffee shops, restaurants, and mixed-use spaces •Enthusiasm for mixed-use development and increased density •Desire to balance development and impacts on affordability and local businesses Online survey feedback: •Desire for the expansion of affordable housing developments, similar to Era on Excelsior •Concerns raised about gentrification and changing housing needs •Potential of higher-density near the Louisiana Station, with buildings over 6 stories Online survey feedback: •Need to balance freight and multimodal transportation traffic •Some support for increased walkability and access along Oxford •Some support for the maintenance of existing industrial uses Online survey feedback: •Intersection improvements desired for certain conditions •Need to improve connections and crossings for bicyclists and pedestrians •Desire for crossing improvements at Louisiana intersections, ensuring mobility and safety for all abilities and ages 8Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 19 West Excelsior Gateway SummaryWest Excelsior Gateway Summary •West Excelsior walking tour: October23, 2023, 14 participants •West Excelsior Business Survey:November + December 2023, 12participants with outreach to anadditional 25+ businesses •Era on Excelsior Pop-up: November15, 2023 from 3:45 to 5 pm, 10participants and an additional 20+impressions •Online Survey West Excelsior gatewayevents West Excelsior Gateway Big IdeasWest Excelsior Gateway Big Ideas Commercial Redevelopment Opportunities Multimodal Circulation Parking and Access West Excelsior Boulevard Design The West Excelsior Boulevard corridor is home to a number of commercial developments of varying states. Should we allow housing to replace some commercial sites along Excelsior Boulevard, between important commercial nodes, to replace the long commercial strip and support remaining commercial businesses? What is the right transition between residential and commercial properties. As commercial properties are redeveloped along the corridor, opportunities to share parking across sites and improve access off of Excelsior Boulevard should be considered. There is a lack of dedicated multimodal infrastructure in the Gateway. What are the opportunities for improving bike infrastructure. For example, can Brunswick Avenue be considered as the north/south connection? Excelsior Boulevard is a county highway, making Hennepin County the decision maker of improvements to the roadway. However, this process can explore a vision for the roadway and suggest changes to the corridor or specific locations to improve mobility for all. Party Jessen Louisiana AveMeadowbrook Golf Course West Excelsior Blvd Hwy 10042nd St 39th Street Brunswick AveColorado AveAlabama AveYosemite AveMethodist Legend: Neighborhood Commercial Redevelopment Opportunities Neighborhood Commercial Nodes Additional Redevelopment Opportunities Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Opportunities 9Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 20 West Excelsior Gateway SummaryWest Excelsior Gateway Summary Commercial redevelopment opportunities: What types of commercial redevelopment would you like to see in the gateway and what is the desired scale for that redevelopment? Parking + access: What changes would you support when visiting commercial destinations along the corridor? For example, would you park in one shared lot and walk to your final destination? Multimodal Circulation: What improvements are needed to improve the ability to walk and bike along Excelsior Boulevard? West Excelsior Boulevard Design: What changes would you like to see to West Excelsior Boulevard to improve walking, biking or driving? In-person event feedback: •Support for the redevelopment of key sites, including Party City and Jessen Press. Openness to more intense mixed-uses •The relationship between future development and existing neighborhoods must be considered in the establishment of the plan •The existing mix of uses and building styles is valued In-person event feedback: •Safety and mobility improvements needs for pedestrians and bicycles traveling along and crossing Excelsior Blvd are needed •Support for a future bikeway along Brunswick Avenue •Crossing enhancements needed at Brunswick Avenue and Yosemite Avenue In-person event feedback: •Parking is an issue for business along the corridor, resulting in on street parking during busy periods •Existing public parking lot at Alabama Avenue is valued, but could be explored for future opportunities •Support for shared parking opportunities among sites In-person event feedback: •Support for a redesign of the roadway, including widened sidewalks, traffic calming, and reduced speeds •The existing planted median is valued •Access management improvements are needed with conflicting turning movements and driver attention Online survey feedback: •Desire to preserve the character and history of St Louis Park by limiting new construction •Support for facade improvement programs and assistance •Concerns raised about parking availability •Preference for mixed -uses with commercial below and residential above Online survey feedback: •Challenges highlighted for bicyclists and pedestrians traveling along the corridor. •Desire for traffic calming, wider sidewalks, and a road diet •Brunswick Avenue supported as good option for a bike path •Need for effective traffic management emphasized Online survey feedback: •Suggested implementation of shared parking structures, similar to the successes at locations like Excelsior and Grand •Preference for on-street parking in the rear lots •Discussion regarding on street parking and the need for overflow parking during high traffic events Online survey feedback: •Suggestions for a mixed-use path or protected bike lane along Excelsior •Concerns about the current interchange design and traffic confusion •Existing crossings at Yosemite and Brunswick are of concern 10Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 21 This report summarizes engagement events and community feedback collected from surveys and in-person events conducted in the third and final phase of engagement for Arrive + Thrive. Activities included the community celebration and an online survey. There were over 150 contributors to engagement activities through this phase. June 2024 PHASE 3 ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 22 Arrive + Thrive Phase 3: Solutions Engagement When: April to May 2024 Do you have additional thoughts/questions? Share any additional comments or questions on the outcomes on a post-it note and place it below. What are you most excited to see completed in the Beltline Gateway? To stay engaged with the implementation of the Beltline outcomes, provide your contact information to stay connected with updates and future actions. Share your priorities! Do you want to be a part of implementation? Which outcomes are you most excited to see completed? Identify the top five outcomes that are most important to you. With the five poker chips provided to you, drop them in the jars for the outcomes that are your highest priority. You can place all five chips in one jar or spread them out across multiple. The third phase of engagement provided an opportunity for the community to learn about the solutions identified through the Arrive + Thrive process and share their thoughts. There were two levels of engagement through the event: INFORM: The draft gateway plans, illustrations and key solutions were shared with community members, including details about future implementation. CONSULT: The activities were developed to gather feedback on the identified solutions from community members. They had opportunities to prioritize the identified solutions, ask questions, and share additional thoughts and ideas. A number of tactics were used to promote the open house and community survey, including: •City and neighborhood social media accounts (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, NextDoor) •Short video to be used on social media •GovDelivery emails to existing subscribers •Postcards sent to the properties within the study area There were two primary methods for collecting input during the third phase - a community celebration and an online survey. The community event was held at Doc’s Hall on May 14th from 4 to 7pm. The online survey was available from April 29th to May 31st. The following materials were prepared for the events: •Short videos introducing each gateway and key solutions •Illustrative plans for each gateway displaying the identified solutions •Solution descriptions that highlighted each outcome with associated graphics. The input gathered through the in-person and online engagement is summarized in the following pages. Phase 3 purpose Phase 3 promotion Phase 3 events Join the conversation! What’s next for gateways into St. Louis Park? Help inform future investments and priorities at the three METRO Green Line light rail stations and West Excelsior Boulevard. bit.ly/slp-arrive-and-thrive THRIVE+ARRIVE ST. LOUIS PARK GATEWAY PLANNING 2Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 23 The in-person and online engagement activities included different ways for community members to prioritize the identified solutions. The following tables summarize the results of each activity, identifying community priorities and the associated data. For the online activity, community members were asked to put the solutions in priority order. The table below uses the average rank for each solution to identify the priority. The in-person activity provided people an opportunity to prioritize up to five solutions by placing markers in corresponding jars, and the resulting numbers were used to identify priorities. Participants were provided an opportunity to share additional thoughts and comments about the identified solutions. Many of these comments focused on excitement for implementation and future action within each gateway. These comments are highlighted. The summary for each gateway is presented in a similar format as identified below. Gateway summary formatGateway summary format •List of the identifies solutions for the respective gateway Gateway solutions Gateway solution priorities Gateway solution priorities Implementation and considerationsImplementation and considerations Online Results Rank Solution Avg. Rank 1 Solution A # 2 Solution B # In-person Results Rank Solution # of chips 1 Solution A # 2 Solution B # Illustrative Plan 3Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 24 Community priorities varied among online and in-person engagement for the Wooddale Gateway. The Highway 100 bike/ pedestrian bridge was highly prioritized by online respondents. Generally, the redevelopment opportunities were well received across all engagement activities. The redevelopment solutions included various comments, including support for the identified areas, questions about building height, and inquiries about displacement of current uses. Wooddale Gateway SummaryWooddale Gateway Summary •Highway 100 bike/pedestrian bridge •New park space addition •Micro Center/Burlington Coat Factory redevelopment •Urban realm enhancements •Former Johnny Pop’s site redevelopment •Walker Street realignment Wooddale Gateway solutions Wooddale Gateway solution priorities Wooddale Gateway solution priorities Online Results Rank Solution Avg. Rank 1 Highway 100 bike/pedestrian bridge 2.22 2 New park space addition 2.6 3 Micro Center Burlington Coat Factory redevelopment 3 4 Urban realm enhancements 3.81 5 Former Johnny Pop's site redevelopment 4.05 6 Walker Street realignment 4.05 In-person Results Rank Solution # of chips 1 Micro Center + Burlington Coat Factory redevelopment 25 2 Former Johnny Pop’s site redevelopment 24 3 Walker Street realignment 16 4 Highway 100 Bike + Pedestrian Bridge 15 5 Urban realm enhancements 14 6 New park space addition 13 4Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 25 The following themes and messages where also heard from community members throughout the engagement process, focusing on the implementation and next steps for the Wooddale Gateway solutions. •Consider fiscal responsibility as a key point of decision making regarding new investments. •Consider the height of new buildings within the surrounding context. •Support public realm enhancements. For example, paint or include art of electrical boxes. •Explore opportunities for public art. The Nash Frame building could be painted towards the rail for an art contest. •Be thoughtful with the use of development incentives in areas where development is likely. •Support for the use of incentives to encourage affordable housing development. •Consider the redevelopment/updates to existing buildings rather than full redevelopment. •Consider noise reduction features with new developments. •Support variety of the multifamily housing developments. •Explore spaces for dogs in the gateway. •Prioritize pedestrian access from Walker Lake to the Wooddale Station. •Support for more connections into the gateway from other parts of the city. •Support for bike facilities with physical separation from driving lanes. •Increase transit opportunities. Wooddale Gateway SummaryWooddale Gateway Summary General implementation Mobility + access Land use + development Parks + natural systems Wooddale Gateway implementation and considerationsWooddale Gateway implementation and considerations 2020 communitymembers signed up for more information or identified a desire to be a part of implementation! 5Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 26 The preservation and enhancement of connections to Bass Lake were prioritized in both in-person and online engagement as the top priority. The design of 35th Street and Raleigh Avenue were also equally prioritized. The new open space and stormwater investments varied in the priority across events. Questions were posed around the extension of Park Glen Road and the residential redevelopment opportunity, but was generally well received. Beltline Gateway SummaryBeltline Gateway Summary •Bass Lake connections •New open space and stormwater •35th Street and Raleigh Avenue design •Park Glen Road building reuse opportunities •Roadway network updates •Mixed use redevelopment •Park Glen Road extension •Residential redevelopment Beltline Gateway solutions Beltline Gateway solution priorities Beltline Gateway solution priorities Online Results Rank Solution Avg. Rank 1 Bass Lake connections 3.31 2 New open space + stormwater 3.61 3 35th Street + Raleigh Avenue design 3.78 4 Park Glen Road building reuse opportunities 3.89 5 Roadway network updates 4 6 Mixed use redevelopment 4.11 7 Park Glen Road extension 4.59 8 Residential redevelopment 5 In-person Results Rank Solution # of chips 1 Bass Lake Connections 21 2 Mixed use development 18 3 35th Street + Raleigh Ave design 16 4 Residential redevelopment 15 5 Roadway network updates 15 6 Park Glen Road building reuse opportunities 13 7 Park Glen Road extension 7 8 New open space + stormwater 6 6Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 27 Beltline Gateway SummaryBeltline Gateway Summary The following themes and messages where also heard from community members throughout the engagement process, focusing on the implementation and next steps for the Beltline Gateway solutions. •Consider welcome and information hubs to share information about community resources. •Support building reuse, that support existing businesses and do not price out current offerings. •Support for more 30% area median income (AMI) housing options with access to transportation hubs. •Support for reuse opportunities with exciting destinations. •Consider planning a variety of trees in public platings to prevent disease transmission. •Utilize drought and heat resistance trees. •Desires for increase public transportation options and connections. •Creating pedestrian friendly spaces and places for people to gather. •Support of additional bike infrastructure throughout the gateway. General implementation Mobility + access Land use + development Parks + natural systems Beltline Gateway implementation and considerationsBeltline Gateway implementation and considerations 1717 communitymembers signed up for more information or identified a desire to be a part of implementation! 7Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 28 Online Results Rank Solution Avg. Rank 1 Pedestrian street connection 2.38 2 Minnehaha Creek connection 3.33 3 Oxford Street design 4.31 4 Stormwater management 4.73 5 Realignment of Methodist Hospital access 4.91 6 South Railroad spur 5.31 7 South Oak Hill redevelopment opportunities 5.54 8 Oxford Street mixed use redevelopment opportunities 5.76 9 Lake Street redevelopment 6.17 In-person Results Rank Solution # of chips 1 South Railroad spur 20 2 Oxford Street mixed use redevelopment opportunities 17 3 Pedestrian street connection 12 4 Minnehaha Creek connection 12 5 Lake Street redevelopment 11 6 Oxford Street design 10 7 Realignment of Methodist Hospital access 8 8 South Oak Hill redevelopment opportunities 5 9 Stormwater management 3 Multimodal connections to destinations and natural spaces were prioritized within the Louisiana Gateway. Redevelopment south of the railroad tracks was a higher priority for in-person respondents than online respondents. Overall, sentiments of support were received for the plan, recognizing that there are lots of elements to address. Louisiana Gateway SummaryLouisiana Gateway Summary •Pedestrian connection •Minnehaha Creek connection •Oxford Street design •Stormwater management •Realignment of Methodist Hospital access •South Railroad spur •South Oak Hill redevelopment opportunities •Oxford Street mixed use redevelopment opportunities •Lake Street redevelopment Louisiana Gateway solutions Louisiana Gateway solution priorities Louisiana Gateway solution priorities 8Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 29 Louisiana Gateway SummaryLouisiana Gateway Summary The following themes and messages where also heard from community members throughout the engagement process, focusing on the implementation and next steps for the Louisiana Gateway solutions. •Support for transportation infrastructure investments. •No specific comments •No specific comments •Support for more connections into the gateway from other parts of the city. •Support for the conversion of the south rail spur to a bikeway. •Explore the noise and traffic impacts of the Methodist access realignment. •Prioritize bicycles, pedestrians, and transit access over parking and vehicles. •Support for dedicated and separated bicycle, pedestrian and vehicular infrastructure. •Louisiana Avenue should be used as part of the route that supports a future intercity shuttle. General implementation Mobility + access Land use + development Parks + natural systems Louisiana Gateway implementation and considerationsLouisiana Gateway implementation and considerations 1010 communitymembers signed up for more information or identified a desire to be a part of implementation! 9Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 30 Mobility investments were highly priorities among respondents, both for the redesign of West Excelsior Boulevard and the implementation of the Brunswick Avenue Bikeway. Redevelopment opportunities within the gateway were prioritized higher by in-person respondents than online respondents. The safety and mobility improvements were well received by community members, with a desire to continue to invest in the neighborhood, including safe mobility and neighborhood commercial opportunities. Excelsior Gateway SummaryExcelsior Gateway Summary •Brunswick Avenue bikeway •West Excelsior Boulevard roadway design •Urban realm enhancements •Brunswick Avenue access change •Party City redevelopment opportunities •Reuse opportunities and shared parking •Zarthan Avenue access change •Jessen Press redevelopment opportunities Excelsior Gateway solutions Excelsior Gateway solution priorities Excelsior Gateway solution priorities Online Results Rank Solution Avg. Rank 1 Brunswick Avenue bikeway 2.81 2 West Excelsior Boulevard roadway design 2.88 3 Urban realm enhancements 3.88 4 Brunswick Avenue access change 4.13 5 Party City redevelopment opportunities 4.29 6 Reuse opportunities and shared parking 4.53 7 Zarthan Avenue access change 4.94 8 Jessen Press redevelopment opportunities 5.85 In-person Results Rank Solution # of chips 1 West Excelsior Boulevard roadway design 27 2 Party City redevelopment opportunities 16 3 Jessen Press redevelopment opportunities 16 4 Urban realm enhancements 16 5 Reuse opportunities and shared parking 10 6 Brunswick Avenue bikeway 10 7 Brunswick Avenue access change 5 8 Zarthan Avenue access change 5 10Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 31 Excelsior Gateway SummaryExcelsior Gateway Summary The following themes and messages where also heard from community members throughout the engagement process, focusing on the implementation and next steps for the Excelsior Gateway solutions. •Support for investment that supports the local neighborhood. •Support for existing businesses. •There is a lot of opportunity for the Excelsior gateway to be a destination within the community, but the roadway needs to be different. •Consider more high density housing opportunities. •Desire for more neighborhood commercial uses, including restaurants and shops. •Support for the inclusion of row housing within the gateway as a other housing option. •Support for mixed use development. •Disconnect from local parks and recreation should be considered as residential development is pursued. •Parking throughout the gateway must be considered as redevelopment is occurring. Consider reduction of parking requirements. •Excelsior is too busy and too fast - it doesn’t need to be a quasi highway and should support walking, biking and connection to city amenities. •Support for extending the median throughout all of Excelsior Boulevard •Support for bike facilities with physical separation from driving lanes. •Increase transit opportunities. •Emphasize pedestrian safety enhancements (e.g., flashing beacons). General implementation Mobility + access Land use + development Parks + natural systems Excelsior Gateway implementation and considerationsExcelsior Gateway implementation and considerations 1111 communitymembers signed up for more information or identified a desire to be a part of implementation! 11Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive draft gateway plans and discussion - Wards 1, 2 and 3 Page 32 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Discussion item: 2 Executive summary Title: Cashless business discussion Recommended action: No action currently required. Purpose of this discussion is to provide background information for council consideration on the unbanked and local businesses that do not accept cash as a payment method. Policy consideration: Does the council support the recommendations contained in this report? Summary: Individuals without bank accounts(unbanked) and those who do not utilize their bank accounts (underbanked) often rely on using cash to make purchases. Businesses that do not accept cash “cashless businesses” limit the ability of unbanked individuals to make purchases, leading to the unintended consequence of their exclusion from the local marketplace and further marginalization. The issue of requiring businesses in St. Louis Park to accept cash as a payment method is multifaceted, including legal, business and enforcement considerations. Payment access for unbanked and underbanked populations is a racial equity and inclusion issue as it disproportionately impacts people of color, immigrants and other marginalized communities. At the same time, making payments with credit cards or checks offers the consumer important fraud prevention tools, and lack of access to those tools also creates a disparity between the banked and unbanked. Staff has made progress researching these areas since the topic was raised in June 2023 and is bringing this update to council with the intention of determining whether, given the information gathered, council feels continuing the policy development process is warranted. Recommendation: Staff recommends monitoring the number of local cashless businesses to see if it becomes more pervasive; adopting a resolution encouraging local retail establishments to accept both cash and digital payments; and consider advocating for banking access for those interested in being banked. Financial or budget considerations: Staff time to implement recommended actions. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Jocelyn Hernandez Guitron, racial equity and inclusion specialist Greg Hunt, economic development manager Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Amelia Cruver, finance director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 2 Title: Cashless business discussion Discussion Background: Minnesota ranks in the top 10 best states for banking access according to Forbes. Only 2.4% of MN households were unbanked in 2021, which is down from 2.8% in 2019 according to an FDIC national survey. The percentage of unbanked households in the Twin Cities metro area was listed at 2.2%. The percentage of unbanked households in St. Louis Park is unknown however given that the city does not have any census tracts with a below-average poverty rate, the percentage of unbanked households in St. Louis Park is likely less than the metro average. An estimated 4.5 percent of U.S. households (approximately 5.9 million) were considered unbanked in 2021 according to a Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) national survey, meaning that no one in the household had a checking or savings account at a bank or credit union. Common reasons for not having a bank account: • “[Do not] have enough money to meet minimum balance requirements” was cited by 21.7% of unbanked households as the main reason for not having an account—the most cited, main reason. • “[Do not] trust banks” was the second-most cited main reason for not having an account in 2021 (13.2%), and • “Avoiding a bank gives more privacy” was the third-most cited main reason (8.4%). The unbanked, and those who do not utilize their bank accounts(underbanked) often rely on using cash to make purchases. Unbanked individuals face challenges accessing businesses that do not accept cash “cashless businesses” as payment for purchases. Some businesses, particularly food and retail establishments, for a variety of reasons, no longer accept cash as a payment method. The number of such businesses increased during the COVID-19 pandemic when businesses were encouraged to go “touchless”. Cashless businesses limit access of the unbanked and underbanked populations to goods and services, leading to the unintended consequence of their further marginalization and exclusion from the local economy and the broader marketplace. Conversely, businesses offering a discount for cash payments, particularly restaurant and retail establishments, are becoming more prevalent as a way to avoid passing on credit card fees to consumers soliciting the business. Payment access for unbanked and underbanked populations is a racial equity and inclusion issue as it disproportionately impacts people of color, immigrants and other marginalized communities. There are multiple factors in accessing banking and credit accounts such as financial stability, legal paperwork and trust in banks. According to an FDIC survey, unbanked rates in 2021 varied considerably across the U.S. population. For example, unbanked rates were higher among lower-income households, Black and Hispanic households, working-age households with a disability and single-mother households. At the same time, there are many benefits to being banked. Increased fraud protection, shared risk, and a greater ability to build assets are some of the benefits. Clearing barriers to be banked for those that want to be banked would help to close this disparity. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 3 Title: Cashless business discussion Present considerations The vast majority of local retail businesses accept both cash and electronic payments. Staff is aware of only two local retail establishments that do not accept cash. Reasons given for not accepting cash as a payment method typically include: • They do not like the inconvenience of handling currency. Retailers have to count it, secure it, account for risk and losses and securely take it to the bank for deposit. • Electronic transactions allow for better and more accurate inventory control and record keeping. • For safety reasons and to deter thefts, some businesses that are open late hours do not want to have their employees run the risk of handling cash. • To avoid counterfeit and safety problems, some businesses want the option of restricting certain dollar bill denominations or certain cash amounts. • Handling cash can be inefficient, particularly during peak transaction periods such as rush hours. Electronic payments enable businesses to serve more customers in a shorter period of time. This leads to cost savings which enables businesses to become more profitable. • In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, some businesses prefer not to handle currency to avoid the possible spread of disease (Note: during the pandemic, the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention encouraged stores to use “touchless” payment methods, such as apps, to prevent surface transmission of COVID-19. But the agency also noted that the virus primarily spreads through the air, not by clinging to surfaces.) Additionally, other businesses, like service and repair businesses, or companies with typically larger transaction amounts, have operating models or physical limitations that simply do not accommodate the acceptance of cash. While the City of St. Louis Park accepts cash payments, the finance division encourages the use of checks and credit cards when possible, because of the fraud protection benefits to the consumer and the city and lowered risk of non-cash transactions. There are some costs for these conveniences and protections, however. Credit card companies typically charge a fee for each transaction ranging anywhere from 1 – 3.5%. This is typically covered by the business accepting credit card payments but is sometimes added to the bill as a surcharge. Businesses are increasingly encouraging cash payment by waiving this transaction fee for cash payment. For convenience and a variety of other reasons, consumers increasingly are using credit or debit cards to pay even for low-cost purchases, such as a cup of coffee, and apps such as Venmo and Apple Pay are becoming increasingly more popular. More than 80% of consumer transactions in 2022 used digital payments, according to a report from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. The percentage of transactions made using cash is declining rapidly as well —down 42% between 2016 and 2022. Still, cash is the most common payment method for people making less than $25,000 a year. Such individuals primarily use cash for purchases under $10. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 4 Title: Cashless business discussion Cash payment alternatives It should be noted that unbanked and underbanked individuals have other payment methods available to them besides cash. These consumers still have the option of making purchases using prepaid debit cards, gift cards, and other electronic payment cards. Some prepaid debit cards allow users to load and make purchases with low or no fees. A 2015 Pew Charitable Trusts report found that the use of general purpose reloadable prepaid payment cards is rising exponentially, particularly among the unbanked. Pre-paid payment cards are growing so fast that the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau approved protections against theft and loss of prepaid cards similar to traditional bank accounts. Prepaid reloadable cards can be purchased at retail stores extensively throughout St. Louis Park and ordered online. Reverse ATMs, such as Eden Prairie-based Ready Credit’s kiosks, have also appeared in recent years in the Twin Cities. These machines allow users to convert cash or credit/debit card funds into prepaid, digital cards, including gift cards. Additionally, the state’s Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) uses electronic benefit transfer (EBT) cards similar to a debit card to enable program participants to make a variety of food purchases. Although these alternatives are available to consumers, loading and using pre-paid cards can present barriers such as what funds can be used for and accessing the means to re-load pre- paid cards. These payment methods are possible but continue to leave the burden of a systemic inequity, being unbanked/underbanked, on already disadvantaged individuals. They also lack some of the security features a traditional bank account would provide and do not aid in asset building. Can a business legally refuse to accept cash under federal law? Because cash contains a display of the phrase “Legal Tender for All Debts Public and Private,” there is a tendency to believe this means it must be accepted everywhere. According to Section 31 U.S.C. 5103 entitled “Legal Tender,” “United States coins and currency [including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve Banks and national banks] are legal tender for all debts, public charges, taxes, and dues.” This means businesses must accept U. S. dollars for their products or services. However, it does not mean they have to be paper dollars. Businesses can accept electronic dollars as payment, too. According to the Federal Reserve Board, there is no federal requirement mandating that businesses must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services. The Board states that businesses are free to develop their own policies on whether to accept cash unless there is a law or local ordinance that says otherwise. Current cash payment protection laws and proposals Governments at various levels have passed measures to ban retail establishments from refusing cash payments however “the momentum for those kinds of laws seems to have slowed since the pandemic” according to a 2022 Star Tribune article. The Payment Choice Act has been introduced in the US Congress but thus far has not passed in either chamber. It is likely to be reintroduced again later this year. Sixteen states and four major cities (San Francisco, Calif., Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 5 Title: Cashless business discussion New York City, Philadelphia, Pa. and Washington, D.C.) have approved legislation or ordinances banning cashless businesses or requiring businesses to accept cash. Another 10 states, including Minnesota, have recently had legislation introduced. To date, it does not appear that any Minnesota city has adopted such an ordinance. To avoid creating competitive disadvantages between cities and given that many businesses strongly dislike having to abide by different operating requirements municipality to municipality, cities may be looking for the state to act to provide an even playing field. Additionally, approving a requirement that is not state or nation-wide requires local businesses with multiple locations in other cities to have different operating procedures, something which many businesses strongly oppose. Per the St. Louis Park city attorney, if the city wishes to pass an ordinance requiring businesses to accept cash payments, the city will need to be mindful to develop a clear record, through studies or surveys, which shows the number of businesses declining to take cash and the tangible problem that it is causing consumers. To be legally upheld, an ordinance would also need to explain how requiring businesses to accept cash would further the city’s interest in resolving the tangible, as opposed to perceived, problem. Narrowing the ordinance to only include certain types of businesses (e.g., towing) would likely be upheld so long as there is tangible evidence to show the problem that is being addressed. Given that a very small number of businesses are cashless, the city may wish to consider the flip side of this issue: how many residents that would like to be banked are not? As discussed in this report, there are considerable benefits to being banked and a disproportionate number of people of color are among the unbanked. While this is not the original policy question that staff were asked to review, banking is a tool to protect and build assets and clearing barriers to gaining access to banking services would positively impact this disparity in access. If a local ordinance is contemplated, a series of questions would need to be addressed such as: • Is there truly a significant and pervasive problem that an ordinance will resolve? • Specifically, which businesses would it apply to and specifically which businesses would be exempt? • How will this impact city revenues and collection of fees and fines? • Would businesses be required to accept cash at all times or only during certain hours, if so, specifically what hours? • Would business be required to accept cash in all denominations? What allowances could be made for not accepting certain denominations, coins or foreign currency? • Would businesses be required to accept cash under all circumstances? What allowances could be made for telephone, mail, or internet transactions or service calls? • How would an ordinance be enforced? • What penalties would be envisioned? • Which city department would be responsible for enforcement and collections and does that department currently have sufficient staff to assume these responsibilities? • What message would such an ordinance send to the local business community about the city’s interjection into their customer payment systems? Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 6 Title: Cashless business discussion • How can we also convey the message that credit card and check payments are preferable, to both the city and other businesses, for reasons that benefit both the consumer and the business? Adopting an ordinance runs the risk of creating unintended consequences for certain businesses (e.g., requiring all businesses to accept cash could create a security risk for those businesses that are open late). The challenge with an ordinance is drafting it in such a way as to be applicable only for those types of businesses, circumstances and transactions for which it was originally intended and articulating those specific types of businesses, circumstances and transactions for which it was not and specifying those exceptions. Summary • Businesses that do not accept cash limit the ability of “unbanked” and “underbanked” individuals to make purchases. This leads to their exclusion from the local marketplace and disproportionately impacts black, indigenous and people of color. • There is benefit in encouraging individuals to be banked. Increased fraud protection, shared risk, and a greater ability to build assets are some of the benefits. Clearing barriers to be banked for those that want to be banked would help to close the racial disparities considered in this report. • The number of unbanked persons in St. Louis Park is likely very small. • The percentage of consumer payments made with cash is rapidly declining. • Businesses are increasingly accepting cash payments to avoid credit card transaction fees. • Unbanked persons have alternative payment methods at their disposal. • The vast majority of retail establishments in St. Louis Park accept cash as a payment method. • The current number of local businesses known not to accept cash is extremely small. • The issue could be further monitored to see if it becomes more pervasive. • An ordinance would require very specific stipulations and exceptions so as not to create unintended hardships on local retailers. • Adopting a measure that is not state or nation-wide requires local businesses with locations in other cities to have different operating procedures, something businesses strongly dislike. • Educating local retail business owners on the unintended consequences of not accepting cash and encouraging them to implement a hybrid model of accepting both cash and digital payments would likely be better received by local businesses. • If a legal measure is seen as necessary, its advocacy is likely best addressed at state or national levels and could be added to the city’s legislative priorities. Recommendation Staff recommends the following approach at this time: • Direct staff to monitor the number of local cashless businesses to see if it becomes more pervasive. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 7 Title: Cashless business discussion • Adopt a resolution encouraging local retail establishments to accept both cash and digital payments. Doing so could bring attention to the issue and serve as a springboard for an education effort as to the unintended consequences of not accepting cash as well as the benefits of accepting cash. • Consider advocating for and exploring how to clear barriers to banking access for those interested in being banked. Many banks offer programs and outreach to those that are looking for banking services but have not been able to access them yet Next steps: If city council is supportive of staff’s recommendations, staff will work with the city attorney to draft a resolution encouraging local businesses to accept cash as a payment method and work with communications staff on any needed educational materials for retailers. Previous/future actions Governing body Date Consider approval of a resolution City Council TBD Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Discussion item: 3 Executive summary Title: Proposed agenda topic - dog parks Recommended action: City council and city manager review the proposed agenda topic and determine next steps. Policy consideration: Not applicable. Summary: A proposed agenda topic related to dog parks was submitted for consideration. City staff prepared a high-level analysis, including information on work previously done by a task force to review the creation of off-leash dog parks in the city. The next step in the process is for the council to decide, as a group, if they want to discuss this topic further at a future study session. Topic Proposed by Councilmember(s) Dog parks Margaret Rog Financial or budget considerations: None at this time. The staff analysis includes an overview of future resources that may be required. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Topic proposal and staff analysis Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager City Council Study Session Topic Proposal Date: Prepared by: Proposed agenda topic: Brief Description of topic (no more than 200 words): How does this topic align with the council strategic priorities? If not, why should the council consider the topic: ** Please email completed forms to Kim Keller and Melissa Kennedy. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 3) Title: Proposed agenda topic - dog parks Page 2 City Council Study Session Topic Proposal Staff Analysis Date: 9/13/24 Prepared by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Proposed agenda topic: Dog parks Staff analysis of request: (Please provide a high-level review of the proposed topic. Focus on key points, facts, impact, legal and/or future considerations.) Background: In 2005, the city council appointed 11 people to a task force to review the creation of off-leash dog parks in the City of St. Louis Park. The task force, along with input from staff, toured and evaluated 14 potential sites in the city. The following criterion was considered when each site was evaluated: minimal sizes of one-acre, varied terrain, adequate parking close to the site, easy street access, and (if possible) close to trails for walking dogs once they are on a leash. The task force met several times, created a survey, and participated in public meetings. After reviewing comments received from public meeting input, survey data and current users, the task force concluded that there are very few opportunities for off-leash sites in our city. The task force made the following recommendations: · Dakota Park is the number one choice for a permanent off-leash site to be opened. ·A second permanent site would be at Cedar Knoll Park. Since the task force evaluated sites in the city, staff is not aware of any additional under - utilized parks, open spaces or private property that can be converted to an off -leash dog park. Additionally, staff have not received questions, comments or feedback from residents regarding the addition of another off-leash dog park, so the level and scope of need within the community would likely need to be further studied. Three Rivers Park District does operate larger off-leash dog park areas. St. Louis Park residents do pay taxes to support operation of those regional facilities. For residents Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 3) Title: Proposed agenda topic - dog parks Page 3 who desire a larger area or an alternative location, the regional dog parks are a good option. Resources required: (Include relevant information such as cost, staffing, capacity) Currently, there is not money in the CIP to study, construct or maintain an additional off-leash site. Other dependencies: (Include relevant information that could impact this proposal, such as: other agencies/jurisdictions, a pending policy discussion or action by council on related item, additional research that may be required to answer pending questions ) Projected timeline: (Given current business levels and capacity, what is the projected timeline for staff to be able to work on and implement? If this was to be done now, what would the impact be on other projects and/or standard line of business?) Recommended disposition: (select one) Study session discussion Council action at regular meeting Written report Include with another item already planned/scheduled Meeting with requesting councilmember(s) Handle offline ✓Other – determine if council wants to pursue Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 3) Title: Proposed agenda topic - dog parks Page 4 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Written report: 4 Executive summary Title: Authority to change the scope and purpose of the statutory bodies Recommended action: None. This item is being provided in response to council’s request for information. Policy consideration: None at this time. This item is being provided for informational purposes only. Summary: During a May 20, 2024, special study session, the city council expressed a desire to further discuss the purpose of the statutory boards. In response, staff compiled information in this report that provides the purpose for each of the statutory boards and commissions and the source of where each body derives their authority. To the extent council has the authority to do so, this report includes the process council would have to follow to make any changes to the purpose or scope of work of any of these boards. A separate study session discussion will be scheduled for January 2025. At that time, the council will be asked to provide direction to staff on this topic. Financial or budget considerations: There are no financial or budget considerations for this item. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion • Chapter 2 of St. Louis Park City Code • Housing Authority state statute: Minnesota statutes 469.001 to 469.047 o Resolutions No. 88-134 and 89-29 o Ordinance No. 1763-88 • Chapter 462 of Minnesota state statute: Planning Commission • Chapter 420, of Minnesota state statute: fire civil service Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4) Page 2 Title: Authority to change the scope and purpose of the statutory bodies Discussion Background: The council has been discussing ways to improve and increase the effectiveness of its boards and commissions since 2022. During a special study session on May 20, 2024, it was noted that one of the statutory boards, the Housing Authority, had concerns about their utilization as a body. Council directed staff to come back with information about the purpose and scope of work for each statutory board along with whether there were opportunities for council to update their scope. St. Louis Park has established statutory boards and commissions through a mix of state statutes and local ordinances; this impacts the scope and authority of each board. Minnesota statutes and city code outline the powers and responsibilities of these boar ds, which include the Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals and the Housing Authority. Technically, the Fire Civil Service Commission is not a board that reports to council; however, they have been included in this report because council makes appointments to their body. The council’s authority to change the full purpose and scope of work for the se four boards and commissions is limited. The League of Minnesota Cities: Handbook for Minnesota Cities offers general guidance to councils contemplating making changes to a board or commission’s purpose, scope of work, etc. It provides a high-level outline of the opportunities and limitations for the council to consider. Specific details regarding the St. Louis Park’s statutory boards and commissions are listed below in present considerations. Here are the general opportunities and limitations provided by the League of Minnesota Cities: Opportunities: • Ordinances and resolutions: • Ordinances: These are laws passed by the city council that can establish, modify or repeal the powers and responsibilities of a board or commission. The process typically involves drafting the ordinance, holding a public hearing (note: St. Louis Park’s boards and commissions do not require a public hearing to be held unless explicitly required in a statute of the governing body), and then voting on it. Ordinances are often used for more permanent or significant changes. • Resolutions: These are formal statements of a decision or expression of opinion by the city council. Resolutions can be used to direct the actions of statutory boards or to set policies. They are generally easier to pass than ordinances and can be used for more temporary or specific issues. • State legislation: Since the city’s authority to have statutory boards and the bodies’ specific authority is often derived from state law, changes to their powers and purposes might require action by the Minnesota State Legislature. The city council can lobby state legislators to propose and pass the necessary changes. This process involves drafting a bill, finding legislative sponsors and navigating the legislative process at the state level. • Administrative actions: The city council can issue new guidelines or policies that affect how statutory boards operate within the framework of existing laws. This might include setting new operational procedures, performance standards, or reporting requirements. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4) Page 3 Title: Authority to change the scope and purpose of the statutory bodies Administrative actions are typically more flexible and can be implemented more quickly than legislative changes. • Public engagement: Engaging with the community through public consultations and hearings is crucial for ensuring that changes reflect the needs and desires of residents. This process can involve holding public meetings, conducting surveys and gathering fee dback from stakeholders. Public engagement helps build consensus and ensures transparency in the decision-making process. Limitations: • Enabling resolution: The city council must pass an enabling resolution to establish or modify the powers of an Economic Development Authority (EDA) or a statutory board. This resolution outlines the roles, responsibilities and limitations of the EDA or a statutory board. • State statutes: Changes must comply with Minnesota state statutes, particularly those outlined in chapter 469 of the Minnesota Statutes, which govern EDAs. These statutes set specific guidelines and limitations on what an EDA or statutory board can and cannot do. • Public hearing: Before making significant changes, the city council is often required to hold a public hearing to gather input from the community. • Review and Approval: Any modifications to the scope of an EDA or a statutory board must be reviewed and approved by the city council. This process includes considering recommendations from the EDA or statutory board. • Legal compliance: All changes must comply with other relevant laws and regulations, including those related to public finance, land use and economic development Present considerations: This report is intended to provide council with the necessary information regarding their authority to change the purpose and scope of work for statutory boards and commissions. If council chooses to pursue changes to any of the statutory boards, the path that is needed to make that change will depend on what the specific change might be. Staff, along with the city attorney, will most likely need to provide additional review and recommendation on any proposed changes. Staff is providing this report to the council in preparation for the statutory board and commission’s check-in meeting on Oct. 28, 2024, which will include representatives from the Fire Civil Service Commission, Planning Commission, Board of Zoning Appeals and Housing Authority. The purpose of the statutory board and commission check-in meeting is to touch base with the council on what each body has been working on. The follow-up discussion around the information in this report will occur at a study session in January 2024. There are three boards and commissions for which the council could consider changes to its purpose and scope of work. A summary of their purpose and where each specific board derives their power is below. Fire Civil Service Commission The Fire Civil Service Commission has the authority to oversee the employment, promotion, discharge, and suspension of all offices and employees within a city’s fire department. This includes roles such as the chief, assistant chief, inspectors and clerks involved in the fire prevention and protection. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4) Page 4 Title: Authority to change the scope and purpose of the statutory bodies Their powers derive from Chapter 420 of the Minnesota Statute, which grants them control and supervision over these aspects to ensure efficiency and proper functioning of the fire department. Changing role, authority or scope of this board will require a change in Minnesota statute. It should be noted that that the City of St. Louis Park is one of very few cities in Minnesota that has a Fire Civil Service Commission. Fire Civil Service Commissions used to be more prevalent in the past. Cities have been moving away from this model and delegating their powers and duties to the city manager, city administrator or city council as aligned with their specific city structure. Housing Authority The Housing Authority has vested powers, duties and obligations to the authority for the purpose of managing, planning and implementing the city’s low- and moderate-income housing programs. The body is additionally responsible for: planning and implementing new housing programs for low- and moderate-income groups, and accepting projects delegated by the EDA. They can also levy special benefit taxes to support these housing projects, with city council approval. In 1970, the City of St. Louis Park first established a Housing Redevelopment Authority. In 1988, the City of St. Louis Park vested the EDA with many powers previously held by the HRA, and the old HRA was renamed to the “Housing Authority” (eliminating the “redevelopment” in its name) and the scope of its responsibilities became more limited. The ordinance shifted to the EDA many of the statutory powers which are enumerated by statute for an HRA. The new Housing Authority of St. Louis Park (the “Authority”) was authorized to “exercise all of the powers granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 469.001 to 469.047” for the purpose “of implementing the city’s low and moderate housing programs and projects. Their powers derive from Chapter 469 of the Minnesota Statutes, which grants them the authority to address substandard, slum or blighted areas and provided housing for low -income families. Changing role, authority or scope of this board will require an ord inance change. Increasing scope of the board would remove duties and authority from the EDA; additionally, there are statutory limitations to consider. Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals The Planning Commission is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations on land use, site plans, conditional use permits, variances and land subdivisions. The commission is also responsible for playing a key role in shaping the city’s comprehensive plan and ensuring orde rly development. The Board of Zoning Appeals is responsible for hearing and deciding appeals related to zoning decisions made by the Zoning Administrator. This includes granting variances, reviewing orders, requirements, permits, decisions or refusals made under the zoning code. The board also ensures that zoning regulations are applied fairly and consistently. Their powers derive from Chapter 462 of the Minnesota Statutes, which provides the legal framework for the commission’s establishment and operation, granting them advisory authority Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 4) Page 5 Title: Authority to change the scope and purpose of the statutory bodies to the city council in all matters wherein powers are assigned to the city council by state law or city charter concerning land use, comprehensive planning, zoning, plating, changes in streets, or other matters of a general planning nature and for the Board of Zoning Appeals to hear appeals and make decisions on zoning matters. Changing role, authority or scope of this board will require a change in Minnesota statute. In conclusion, the city council can propose changes to the scope of work for statutory boards, but there are tradeoffs and limitations. Any changes would need to comply with state statutes and local ordinances. Additionally, significant changes might require approval from the state legislature or a vote by the city residents, depending on specific legal framework governing the city. Next steps: There will be a later study session item in January 2024 for council members to provide staff direction about whether to pursue changes to statutory boards’ scope of work. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Written report: 5 Executive summary Title: REI system kick-off Recommended action: None. The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of the planned discussions in the study sessions included in the racial equity and inclusion (REI) system. Policy consideration: During each item’s discussion, the council will be asked specific policy questions related to the topic being discussed. Summary: The racial equity and inclusion (REI) division is charged with guiding the city’s racial equity and inclusion efforts including policy creation, professional development and consulting on department projects. In 2024, this division coordinated the monthly Year of Learning REI professional development trainings for employees, supported the growth of Employee Resource Groups (ERG), and provided REI consulting on different departmental projects using the racial equity impact analysis tool. The REI division has transitioned to the administrative services department and continues to expand organizational understanding and capacity to create a more equitable and inclusive St. Louis Park. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. Supporting documents: Racial equity and inclusion system schedule Prepared by: Jocelyn Hernandez Guitron, racial equity and inclusion specialist Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5) Page 2 Title: REI system kick-off Discussion Background: In 2018, the council adopted five strategic priorities as a part of the vision 3.0 process. One of the five priorities identified was: “Being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. Over the past few years, staff have been aligning systems and programs to ensure that this strategic priority is being achieved. Past policy discussions in this system have included: Topic Notes Requiring accepting cash as payment Council learned about the unbanked issue and how it manifests in St. Louis Park. Council learned what it will take to regulate it, what it would require of businesses/staff, and what outcomes we could expect. Internship and career pathways approaches Council learned about existing internship and career pathways programs and their intended evolution. Boards and Commissions Council learned about program purpose and structure for our boards & commissions. Cultural Observances Council learned about the work around cultural observances – including and beyond proclamations. Community Health Updates regarding the fire department community health program. REI Policy Update Council members reviewed a draft REI policy and the engagement summary/analysis. Advancing racial equity means closing the gaps so that race does not predict one’s success, while simultaneously improving outcomes for all. Given that underlying systems are the force driving inequities, the focus must be on structural transformation. The city is centering racial equity and inclusion (REI) to transform policies and structures to close these gaps. This allows the city to target improvements toward those most burdened by racial inequity. The reports in the 2024 REI system are part of these efforts towards advancing the city priority of racial equity and inclusion. Present considerations: This series of the discussion will focus on the following topics: Cashless business discussion: This topic was discussed during a previous REI system, providing an introduction to the topic of unbanked and underbanked individuals and the impact of cashless businesses. The report included in this REI system expands and this report with more details on the REI impacts and the existing literature on what other cities have implemented, including further considerations the city would need to address for a potential ordinance. This additional work was done collaboratively between staff from the community development department and the REI division. This discussion also includes the staff recommendation on next steps for this topic. Special study session meeting of October 21, 2024 (Item No. 5) Page 3 Title: REI system kick-off Fire department community health pilot discussion: This topic was discussed during a previous REI system. In this discussion, the fire department will be discussing a recommended approach to the community health program with council. Racial equity and inclusion council training discussion: The REI division will offer a training for council members to further develop their understanding of racial equity and inclusion. 2025 proclamations and cultural observances report: This report has been included in past REI systems and continues to evolve as significant cultural observances are recognized. In 2024, staff has worked to make proclamations a document of observation, connection and learning by including links to further reading, community organizations and ideas of local events to attend for experiential learning. In 2025, REI will continue this work and has consulted with staff from employee resource groups to ensure that the list of proclamations and cultural observances are relevant and representative of the St. Louis Park community. Racial equity and inclusion system schedule: Topic Date Description Racial equity and inclusion system kick- off - introduction 10/21/2024 Provide a high-level overview of system discussion. Cashless businesses - discussion 10/21/2024 Presentation and discussion of proposed recommendation related to cashless businesses and access for unbanked/underbanked individuals. Fire department community health pilot - discussion 11/4/2024 Presentation and discussion of a recommended approach to the community health program. Racial equity and inclusion council training - discussion 11/4/2024 The REI Specialist will facilitate a racial equity and inclusion training for council. 2025 proclamations and cultural observances - report 11/18/2024 Written report detailing proposed proclamations and cultural observances to include in the 2025 council year. Racial equity and inclusion system wrap-up - report 11/18/2024 Written report summarizing the council’s policy direction from the systems discussions that will guide city staff implementation efforts. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 21, 2024 Written report: 6 Executive summary Title: 2025 Social Services Request for Proposal Recommended action: No action required. This report is for informational purposes only. Policy consideration: None. For information only. Summary: The city has previously funded social service agencies through a direct allocation to specific non-profit entities that provide services to St. Louis Park residents. Beginning in 2025, the process will be conducted through a competitive request for proposal (RFP) process. The city has budgeted $250,000 in 2025 for contractual services with non-profit agencies serving residents in St. Louis Park that meet the priority goals for the program: • Emergency housing assistance for low-income persons/households at or below 60% AMI for renters and 115% for homeowners • Services to support senior independence to allow low-income adults 60 and older to remain in their home • Services for individuals and households experiencing food insecurity to improve access to healthy food • Support programs that assist landlords providing affordable rental housing* to offset rent losses due to evictions for non-payment of financial obligations by tenants at or below 60% AMI. (*Rent must be affordable to households at or below 60% AMI and must be verified ) Staff anticipates the RFP will be shared broadly beginning the week of October 21 and proposals will be due Nov. 25, 2024. The city will tentatively notify applicants of recommended awards by Dec. 31, 2024. Formal award of contracts for services will occur in early 2025. In subsequent years we anticipate the RFP process starting earlier in the year. Financial or budget considerations: $250,000 has been budgeted for the 2025 social services request for proposal: $200,000 from the affordable housing trust fund and $50,000 from the general fund. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: None Prepared by: Marney Olson, housing supervisor Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Amelia Cruver, finance director Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager