HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024/09/16 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
SEPTEMBER 16, 2024
6:00 p.m. Economic Development Authority meeting – Council Chambers
1.Call to order
a.Roll call.
2.Approve agenda.
3.Minutes
a.Minutes of August 19, 2024 EDA meeting
4.Consent items – none.
5.Public hearings – none.
6.Regular business
a.Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
7.Communications and announcements – none.
8.Adjournment.
6:15 p.m. City council meeting – Council Chambers
1.Call to order
a.Roll call.
b.Pledge of Allegiance.
2.Approve agenda.
3.Presentation
a.Proclamation observing “Latino Heritage Month”
4.Minutes
a.Minutes of August 19, 2024 city council meeting
b.Minutes of August 19, 2024 city council special study session
5.Consent items
a.Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
b.Resolution appointing election workers for the Nov. 5, 2024 state general election
c.Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3920
France Avenue South - Ward 2
d.Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2: Cedar Lake Road and
Louisiana Avenue Improvements project (4024-1100) - Ward 4
e.Resolution approving off-site gambling for Community Charities of MN
6.Public hearing
a.Resolution approving assessment of delinquent charges
Agenda EDA, city council and special study session meetings of September 16, 2024
7.Regular business
a.First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in I-G general
industrial district
b.Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
8.Communications and announcements – none.
9.Adjournment.
Following city council meeting – special study session – Community Room
Discussion item
1. Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion
Written reports
2. MnDOT I-394 and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project - next steps - Ward 4
3. Cannabis zoning ordinance
Members of the public can attend St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and city council meetings in
person. At regular city council meetings, members of the public may comment on any item on the agenda by
attending the meeting in-person or by submitting written comments to info@stlouisparkmn.gov by noon the
day of the meeting. Official minutes of meetings are available on the city website once approved.
Watch St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority or regular city council meetings live at
bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or at www.parktv.org, or on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14/HD channel 798).
Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on the city's YouTube channel at
www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the meeting’s end.
City council study sessions are not broadcast.
Generally, it is not council practice to receive public comment during study sessions.
The council chambers are equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow.
If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505.
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Minutes: 3a
Unofficial minutes
EDA meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Aug. 19, 2024
1. Call to order.
Vice President Budd called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
a. Roll call
Commissioners present: Paul Baudhuin, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Yolanda Farris
Commissioners absent: President Lynette Dumalag, Margaret Rog
Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), planning manager
(Mr. Walther), economic development manager (Mr. Hunt), sustainability manager (Ms. Ziring),
deputy city clerk (Ms. Scott-Lerdal)
2. Approve agenda.
It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Mohamed, to approve the
EDA agenda as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (President Dumalag and Commissioner Rog absent).
3. Minutes.
a. EDA meeting minutes of Aug. 8, 2024
It was moved by Co mmissioner Farris, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve the EDA
meeting minutes of Aug. 8, 2024 as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (President Dumalag and Commissioner Rog absent).
4. Consent items.
a. EDA Resolution No. 24-14 approving of 9th amendment to contract for private
development-Zelia on Seven - Ward 2
It was moved by Co mmissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Farris, to approve the
consent items as listed and to waive reading of all resolutions .
The motion passed 5-0 (President Dumalag and Commissioner Rog absent).
5. Public hearings – none.
Page 2 Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3a)
Title: EDA meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
6.Regular business – none.
7.Communications and announcements - none.
8.Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 6:03 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, EDA secretary Lynette Dumalag, EDA president
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Action agenda item: 6a
Executive summary
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolutions approving 2025 HRA and EDA levies
Policy consideration: Does the EDA support the EDA levy and HRA levy pieces of the overall
preliminary property tax levy payable in 2025 of $49,979,665, a 7.52% increase from 2024,
made up of the following components:
•$48,598,532 for core government services and debt payments (general and debt service
levies)
•$1,194,133 for housing projects and programs (HRA levy)
•$187,000 for economic development projects and programs (EDA levy)
Summary: This report is unchanged from the Sept. 9, 2024 city council agenda packet. After
several council study sessions focused on the budget this summer, staff presented council a
recommended budget and corresponding all-inclusive levy increase on Aug. 12, 2024 of 9%. Staff
received feedback that was generally supportive of the new spending items, but uncomfortable
with the all-inclusive levy increase of 9%. This report lays out a revised budget that lowers the
levy increase to 7.52%. The recommendations for the EDA and HRA levies remain the same and
reductions are made to the general levies from what was first proposed on Aug. 12, 2024.
This increase would result in a 6.6% increase in property taxes for a homesteaded median value
($377,200) home in St. Louis Park. This works out to an increase of $109 dollars a year or $9
dollars a month.
Financial or budget considerations: The proposed levies will help support necessary city services
to be provided during 2025.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution (HRA levy)
Resolution (EDA levy)
Prepared by: Amelia Cruver, finance director
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 2
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
Discussion
Background: Staff presented council a recommended budget and corresponding all-inclusive
levy increase of 9% on Aug. 12, 2024. The budget included funding for base spending on
existing people and programs, some adjustments to the budget to move ongoing spending back
to the general fund instead of one-time funding sources, new initiatives and programs to
support strategic priorities, and the capital budget. At that meeting, staff received feedback
that was generally supportive of the new spending items, but uncomfortable with the all-
inclusive levy increase of 9%. Staff was provided with direction to cut the recommended budget
by approximately one levy percentage point.
Present considerations
Staff began working on a revised proposal that reduced the levy and maintained funding for key
programs and services. In completing this work, staff sought to uphold the following principles:
• Maintain existing programs and follow current city policies.
• Changes in funding should be made after understanding the impact to racial equity.
• Prioritize funds for new programs on items with a high impact on city priorities.
• All changes to the budget should consider both the impact on the 2025 tax levy, and
also the long-term costs and risks associated with the change.
This report will lay out a staff recommended budget and associated levy, proposed changes to
the budget and impact of those changes, and options for council refinement. Staff’s updated
proposed budget has an all-inclusive levy increase of 7.52%.
Changes to initial budget recommendation
Using the State of Minnesota energy benchmarking program. Council recently decided to
utilize the state’s new energy benchmarking program starting in 2025 rather than continuing to
fund and administer the city’s benchmarking program. This will result in $26,000 in savings for
the benchmarking help desk contract in the 2025 general fund budget and levy, as well as a
shift in staff resources to other projects.
Moving and rescoping the Municipal Service Center roof project. In the CIP presented to
council on Aug. 12, 2024, the Municipal Infrastructure Fund supported phase 1 of a 3 phase
project to replace the roof at the MSC. After receiving quotes for the project, staff now believes
that the roof can wait to be replaced for a few years. In addition, facilities staff would prefer to
replace the entire roof in one year, rather than spread the work out over three. The length of
the asset life and dollar amount for the now one-year project make it a good candidate for
bond funding. In the revised CIP, the roof replacement project has been moved from a three-
phase project at $500k each year funded through the capital levy, to a one-time project in 2027
funded through borrowing. A modest amount of funding will be kept in the budget for 2025 to
manage any repairs that may be needed until the full replacement.
Utilizing more fund balance in the Park Improvement Fund. In the CIP presented to council on
Aug. 12, 2024, $350,000 was included for replacing the pool gutters at the aquatic park. At the
same time, the city is investigating the need for and potential timing of a replacement or major
renovation of the pool. Unfortunately, the feasibility study will not be completed in time to
Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 3
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
inform the 2025 maximum levy. However, the city will have the results of this feasibility study
before a gutter replacement project commences. To manage this uncertainty, staff is
recommending that the project remain in the CIP, but that it is budgeted as a fund balance
expense, rather than being supported by the levy. The use of fund balance in the Park
Improvement is increased from $200,000 to $350,000 in the revised proposal. If the gutters are
determined to not be needed in 2025, the city will retain the $350,000 in the fund balance to
be used in future budget processes.
Removing delamination response. The unexpected delamination of some city streets has been
the topic of several city council discussions and staff reports. In April 2024, council provided
staff direction for staff to explore including delamination response in future budget processes.
Following this direction, staff priced out a response plan and included it in the initial CIP
presented Aug. 12, 2024. After a robust discussion council did not reach a consensus on if the
value gained by addressing delamination warranted the expense.
In an effort to move the conversation forward ahead of the preliminary levy adoption on Sept.
16, 2024, this report will review the initial staff recommendation and rationale to not address
delamination at this time.
Staff is recommending not including funding to address delamination based on the following
rationale:
1. Road maintenance and replacement in the CIP is determined based on road condition.
While delamination is unsightly, there is not a clear impact on the fundamental
condition of the road. Engineering already prioritizes the roads with the worst structural
condition to be addressed each year to meet funding constraints. In 2025, the city is
reaching the limit of our franchise fee revenue and will need to seek adjustments to the
franchise fees moving forward to keep pace with the current plan for road maintenance
that relies on road condition information. Adding delamination to the budget in 2025
will create a CIP that funds maintenance and repair for roads in 2025 that are in better
structural condition than roads several years out in the plan.
2. A condition-driven planning process is the most equitable way to budget street
improvements. Road condition is an objective measure that can be used without bias
across a geographical area. Basing planning and funding decisions off of complaints
introduces privilege and bias to the process as there are often inequities in which
residents feel comfortable making complaints or contacting public officials.
3. Making the decision to address streets that show signs of delamination would create a
new expectation, if not a new policy, that the city would incorporate this work into
future CIP’s. Residents along the remaining 26 miles of streets at risk for delamination
would likely expect the same treatment on their streets as was provided to their
neighbors. This means the current $3.5 million estimate to address delamination is the
floor, not the ceiling, of funds required. Adding a delamination response to the 2025
budget would add risk, as well as cost, to the long-range financial plan.
Should council determine that any of these revised budget components are not in keeping with
their desired 2025 budget, staff will revise the CIP and associated levy needs accordingly.
Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 4
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
Revised Levy
Recommended 2025 Levy
Fund 2024
Adopted
Change 2025
Proposed
Percentage
Change
General Fund $34,147,654 $4,661,161 $38,808,815 14%
Capital Replacement Fund $2,177,793 $45,703 $2,223,496 2%
Park Improvement Fund $860,000 -$350,000 $510,000 -41%
Employee Benefits Fund $200,000 $200,000 0%
Subtotal General Levies $37,385,447 $4,356,865 $41,742,311 12%
Debt Service Levy $6,362,813 $493,408 $6,856,221 8%
General and Debt Service Levies $43,748,260 $4,850,273 $48,598,532 11%
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Levy
$1,744,133 -$550,000 $1,194,133 -32%
Economic Development Authority
Levy
$877,000 -$690,000 $187,000 -79%
Total Property Tax Levy $46,483,749 $3,495,916 $49,979,665 7.52%
Updates to the 5-year outlook
In addition to the changes listed above, staff has increased the growth assumptions in the base
budget from 4.5% to 5% based on recent years’ experiences. This will be revised each year
using actual information on personnel costs and salary increases, increases in the cost of our
benefits, changes to non-tax revenues and the cost to maintain our current service level.
In order to accommodate for the additional fund balance usage if pool gutters are required, the
tax levy for the park improvement fund is raised back to 2024 levels over two years and the
capital improvement levy is increased each year with the goal of closing our structural deficit by
2029. The size and cadence of these increases should be adjusted after the city updates the TIF
management report in the fall to take advantage of any expansions to the tax base in the
coming five years.
The below forecast includes funding for current programs and those proposed as a part of the
2025 budget process and any known increases in costs but does not include any spending on
new or expanded programs in the future. Increases to staff or program expansions will lead to
larger than projected levy increases. In that same vein, these projections include our current,
best forecasts for non-tax revenue. Should economic conditions change, non-tax revenues will
change and that will also impact the demand on the levy in a given year.
Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 5
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
Five-year Financial Outlook
Fund 2024
Adopted
2025
Proposed
2026
Forecast
2027
Forecast
2028
Forecast
2029
Forecast
General Fund $34,147,654 $38,808,815 $40,749,256 $43,176,719 $45,335,555 $47,602,333
Capital Replacement Fund $2,177,793 $2,223,496 $2,557,020 $3,068,424 $3,835,531 $4,410,860
Park Improvement Fund $860,000 $510,000 $700,000 $860,000 $860,000 $860,000
Employee Benefits Fund $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
Subtotal General Levies $37,385,447 $41,742,311 $44,206,277 $47,305,143 $50,231,086 $53,073,193
Debt Service Levy $6,362,813 $6,856,221 $7,523,750 $7,566,453 $8,139,875 $8,690,269
General and Debt Service
Levies
$43,748,260 $48,598,532 $51,730,027 $54,871,596 $58,370,961 $61,763,462
HRA Levy $1,744,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133
EDA Levy $877,000 $187,000 $374,000 $374,000 $374,000 $374,000
Total Property Tax Levy $46,483,749 $49,979,665 $53,298,159 $56,439,729 $59,939,093 $63,331,595
Total Levy Growth 7.52% 6.64% 5.89% 6.20% 5.66%
Staff will continue to work to reduce the overall levy increase by analyzing duplicative budget
lines, verifying revenue forecasts and looking for additional outside revenues and will report
back to council in mid-November on progress.
Property Tax Impact
The table below shows the impact to the median property by type of a 7.52% levy increase. On
top of the changes in value year to year, state policy changes reduced the tax rate for
homestead properties and reduced the tax rate on Class C, 4D properties. This led to another
shift, on top of the variable changes in value across the property types.
Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 6
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
Next Steps
On Sept. 16, 2024, city council will approve the 2025 preliminary maximum levy. Staff
recommends the budget and associated 7.52% levy increase detailed in this report, with the
understanding that staff will continue to work towards lowering the final levy that is approved
in December 2024.
7.52% Levy Impact
2024 2025
Percent
Change 24
to 25
Annual
Increase
Monthly
Increase
Median
Est.
Market
Value
Property
Tax
Payable
Median
Est.
Market
Value
Property
Tax
Payable
Single-Family
Homestead $373,300 $1,646 $377,200 $1,755 6.60% $108.71 $9.06
Non-Hmstd $373,300 $1,663 $377,200 $1,816 9.21% $153.15 $12.76
Condominium
Homestead $208,800 $848 $203,900 $846 -0.24%-$2.00 -$0.17
Non-Hmstd $208,800 $930 $203,900 $981 5.55% $51.58 $4.30
Townhome
Homestead $260,700 $1,100 $252,200 $1,099 -0.05%-$0.53 -$0.04
Non-Hmstd $260,700 $1,161 $252,200 $1,214 4.56% $52.93 $4.41
Apartments
Class A $280,500 $1,562 $280,000 $1,685 7.89% $123.21 $10.27
Class B $192,200 $1,070 $185,000 $1,113 4.03% $43.16 $3.60
Class C $124,000 $690 $123,900 $745 8.00% $55.19 $4.60
Class A (4D-1) $280,500 $937 $280,000 $337 -64.0%-$599.97 -$50.00
Class C (4D-1) $124,000 $414 $123,900 $149 -64.00%-$265.08 -$22.09
Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 7
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
EDA Resolution No. 24-___
Authorizing the preliminary HRA levy for 2025
Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the “EDA Act”),
the city council of the City of St. Louis Park created the St. Louis Park Economic Development
Authority (the "Authority"); and
Whereas, pursuant to the EDA Act, the city council granted to the Authority all of the
powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of the
Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and
Whereas, Section 469.033, subdivision 6 of the Act authorizes the Authority to levy a tax
upon all taxable property within the city to be expended for the purposes authorized by the HRA
Act; and
Whereas, such levy may be in an amount not to exceed 0.0185 percent of estimated
market value of the city; and
Whereas, the Authority has filed its budget for the special benefit levy in accordance with
the budget procedures of the city in the amount of $1,194,133 and
Whereas, based upon such budgets the Authority will levy all or such portion of the
authorized levy as it deems necessary and proper;
Now therefore be it resolved that approval is hereby given for the St. Louis Park
Economic Development Authority to levy, for taxes payable in 2025, such tax upon the taxable
property of the city as the Authority may determine, subject to the limitations contained in the
HRA Act.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority September 16, 2024:
Karen Barton, executive director Lynette Dumalag, president
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Economic development authority meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 8
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 HRA and EDA levies
EDA Resolution No. 24-_____
Approving a present intent to levy a tax for Economic
Development Authority Purposes pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.107
Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1082, as
amended (the “Act”), the city established the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the
“EDA”); and
Whereas, Section 469.107, subdivision 1 of the Act authorizes the city, at the request of
the EDA, to levy and collect a tax of up to 0.01813% of the estimated market value of taxable
property within the city, levied upon all taxable real property within the city, for economic
development purposes; and
Whereas, the EDA has requested that the city approve such a levy in the amount of
$187,000 and the city finds that such a levy is in the best interest of the city and EDA because it will
facilitate economic development,
Now therefore be it resolved that the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority
hereby recommends that the city approve the preliminary levy of a tax for economic
development purposes pursuant to Section 469.107, subdivision 1 of the Act in the amount
equal to $187,000 with respect to taxes payable in calendar year 2025.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority September 16, 2024:
Karen Barton, executive director Lynette Dumalag, president
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Presentation: 3a
Executive summary
Title: Proclamation observing “Latino Heritage Month”
Recommended action: Mayor to read proclamation observing Sept. 15 through Oct. 15, 2024
as Latino Heritage Month.
Policy consideration: None
Summary: Latino Heritage Month is a time to recognize the significant contributions of Latino
communities to United States history and culture. This month-long celebration began in 1988
and falls during the time span when several Latin American countries celebrate their
Independence Day. St. Louis Park is home, workplace and a place of gathering for many Latino
people. We take this time to recognize the diverse Latino heritage in our city and state.
Financial or budget considerations: None
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity
and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: Resource page
Proclamation
Prepared by: Jocelyn Hernandez Guitron, race, equity and inclusion specialist
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Proclamation observing “Latino Heritage Month”
Resource page
To celebrate Latino Heritage month, the City of St. Louis Park invites you to:
• Explore the diversity of Latino identity.
o Latino Identity | National Museum of the American Latino (si.edu)
o Exploring Latino Diversity in the United States — Google Arts & Culture
• Learn about the history of Latino communities in our state and city.
o Hispanic Heritage Month | National Museum of the American Latino (si.edu)
o Minnesotanos: Latino journeys in Minnesota - MinnPost
• Connect with Latino organizations in Minnesota.
o LatinoLEAD | #WeAreLatinoLEAD (latinoleadmn.org)
o Community Resources / Minnesota Council on Latino Affairs (mn.gov)
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Proclamation observing “Latino Heritage Month”
Proclamation observing
“Latino Heritage Month”
Whereas, Latino communities are an integral part of the diversity that makes St. Louis
Park a great place to experience life; and
Whereas, the United States celebrates Latino heritage month from September 15 to
October 15 to recognize Latino culture, contributions and history; and
Whereas, these dates fall on the Independence days of several Latino nations including
Mexico, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Chile and Belize; and
Whereas, Latino entrepreneurs, educators, and community and political leaders have
helped create a more just and inclusive St. Louis Park for all; and
Whereas, Latinos are a significant part of the fabric of Minnesota and our city; and
Whereas, this month is an opportunity to learn about the diversity of the Latino
experience and build awareness of the history of discrimination and prejudice many have faced
in the United States; and
Whereas, St. Louis Park recognizes the work still needed to ensure all communities have
increased access and opportunity to participate in all parts of city life.
Now, therefore, let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, hereby observe September 15 to October 15, 2024, as Latino Heritage Month
in our community.
Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the
Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be
affixed this 16th day of September, 2024.
_________________________________
Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Minutes: 4a
Unofficial minutes
City council meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Aug. 19, 2024
1. Call to order.
Mayor Mohamed called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m.
a. Pledge of allegiance
b. Roll call
Council members present: Mayor Nadia Mohamed, Paul Baudhuin, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd,
Lynette Dumalag, Yolanda Farris, Margaret Rog
Council members absent: Council Members Dumalag and Rog
Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), city attorney (Mr. Mattick), deputy city manager (Ms.
Walsh), sustainability manager (Ms. Ziring), park and recreation director (Mr. West), planning
manager (Mr. Walther), economic development manager (Mr. Hunt), building & energy director
(Mr. Hoffman), Police Chief Kruelle, Deputy Police Chief Nadem, deputy city clerk (Ms. Scott-
Lerdal), nature center manager (Mr. Oestreich), engineering director (Ms. Heiser), natural
resources manager (Mr. Bahe), naturalist (Mr. Fleck), naturalist programmer, (Ms. Turnbull), Jr.
Naturalist coordinator (Mr. Casey-Fix), communication manager (Mr. Sandell), recreation
supervisor (Ms. Friederich), associate planner (Ms. Champoux)
Guests: St. Louis Park Parktacular Ambassador Director Marla Destache; Ian Thomas and Rick
Gravrock, Monterey Cohousing Community; Officer Luke Ellanson and family; Evan Jacobsen,
Tushie Montgomery Architects; Rick McKelvey, Hempel Real Estate
2. Approve agenda.
It was moved by Council Member Budd, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve the
agenda as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent).
3. Presentations.
a. Westwood Hills Nature Center junior naturalist recognition
Forty youth volunteers served in the junior naturalist program during the summer of 2024.
Collectively, they volunteered over 1,400 hours. The junior naturalists received special
recognition and a letter of recommendation in celebration of their service.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Title: City council meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
b. St. Louis Park Parktacular Ambassador program recognition
Ms. Destache discussed the ambassador program and the role of ambassadors in the
community. She introduced and recognized current Parktacular Ambassadors including:
Mare Saffe and Joanne Hed, St. Louis Park Parktacular Senior Ambassadors; Abigail Oppegaard,
Catherine "Catie" Miller, Estella Hughes and Sidney Bradley, St. Louis Park Parktacular
Ambassadors; Lily Berggren, Ebba Berggren and Fiona Penna, St. Louis Park Parktacular Junior
Ambassadors.
c. Retirement recognition for Officer Luke Ellanson
Mayor Mohamed read the resolution and presented a plaque to Officer Ellanson for his service
of over 20 years with the City of St. Louis Park.
Police Chief Kruelle congratulated Officer Ellanson for his years of service and his passion for
policing in the city. He thanked Officer Ellanson for his dedicated service.
Officer Ellanson stated he will miss the community, and it has been an honor to work here. He
will miss all his partners in public safety and thanked the council for their support.
Council Member Farris stated she remembered Officer Ellanson when she participated in the
Citizens Academy Program and when working with him in the community. She fondly recalled
doing cook-offs together.
Council Member Brausen thanked Officer Ellanson for his service, and his family for their
support over the years. He wished him good luck and hoped Officer Ellanson would enjoy his
retirement.
d. Proclamation observing Aug. 25, 2024, as the Centennial Celebration of the Star of
Bethlehem Home, residence of Monterey Cohousing Community – Ward 1
Mayor Mohamed read the proclamation observing the 100th anniversary of the historical
location of the Monterey Cohousing Community. The home was built in 1924 and originally
known as the “Star of Bethlehem Home.”
Mr. Thomas and Mr. Gravrock of the Monterey Cohousing Community accepted the
proclamation, thanked the council and city staff for their assistance in the recognition, and
explained the upcoming celebration program to be held on Sun., Aug. 25, 2024.
Council Member Brausen thanked the recipients and stated the building is beautiful. He added
that the historic location has been repurposed wonderfully; it is a model for the community.
Council Member Baudhuin added he is looking forward to attending the upcoming event and
looks forward to learning more. He stated the building is in Council Member Rog’s ward and he
is happy to read the proclamation on her behalf, as she will be unable to attend.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Title: City council meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
e. Recognition of donations
Mayor Mohamed recognized and thanked the following people for their donations to the city,
on behalf of the council:
• Pamela Gruber $2,800 for memorial park benches, including concrete pads,
honoring Josh Gruber and to be placed in Bass Lake Park
• Kimberly Wick $2,800 for memorial park benches, including concrete pads, to be
placed in Bass Lake Park
• Jack Stack $2,200 for memorial park benches, including concrete pads, honoring Jack
Stack and to be placed in Twin Lakes Park
4. Minutes.
a. Minutes of Aug. 8, 2024 city council meeting
It was moved by Council Member Budd, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve the
Aug. 8, 2024 city council meeting minutes as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent).
5. Consent items.
a. Resolution No. 24-090 recognizing the retirement of Officer Luke Ellanson
b. Resolution No. 24-091 accepting donations for memorial park benches
c. Resolution awarding the sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2024B (This item was
removed from the consent agenda and set as 7c in the agenda)
d. Resolution No. 24-092 authorizing city depositories
e. Approve annual financial report for the year ended December 31, 2023
f. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance 24-2679 relating to 2025 fees
g. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance 24-2680 amending Ch. 22 of the city code
regarding bulk material storage
h. Resolutions No. 24-093, 24-094, 24-095 approving grant agreements with MnDOT for
Cedar Lake Road/ Louisiana Avenue Improvements projects - Ward 4
i. Resolution No. 24-096 removing parking restrictions at 3601 Lynn Avenue (Traffic Study
No. 792) - Ward 2
j. Resolution No. 24-097 authorizing final payment for 2023 Pavement Management
project (4023-1000) - Wards 3 and 4
k. Approve replacement of asphalt paver and tandem dump truck
l. Resolution No. 24-098 authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at
3350 Brunswick Avenue South - Ward 3
m. Resolution No. 24-099 authorizing special assessment for sewer line repair at 3309
Zarthan Avenue South - Ward 1
n. Resolution No. 24-100 accepting a donation from Discover St. Louis Park for Jason West
to attend the US Sports Congress
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 4
Title: City council meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
Council Member Brausen commented that item 5h pertains to the ongoing project in Ward 4,
scheduled for construction over the next two years. He thanked the State of Minnesota for
assisting the city through grants totaling $5 million to accomplish this substantial regional
project. He also thanked staff for seeking out additional sources of revenue, so the residents of
St. Louis Park do not carry the entire financial burden.
Council Member Brausen also commented on item 5k regarding capital expenditures. He noted
the asphalt paver and dump truck the city is acquiring will replace vehicles put in service in
2001. City staff maintained this machinery to help save money, for which he thanked them.
However, he noted it is time to replace both vehicles.
Mayor Mohamed noted item 5n, a donation from Discover St. Louis Park for Jason West to
attend the US Sports Congress. Collaboration with Discover St. Louis Park is always a great
opportunity, and she thanked them for partnering with the city.
It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to move
consent item 5c to regular business as item 7a and to approve the consent items as revised; and
to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent).
6. Public hearings.
a. Approve on-sale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales for Marcus West End,
LLC – Ward 4
Ms. Scott-Lerdal presented the staff report.
Mayor Mohamed opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Mohamed
closed the public hearing.
Council Member Brausen noted this is the former ICON Theater, whose ownership had
maintained a liquor license in the past. He commented the theater is an amenity for the
community and he is happy to support the new ownership’s license approval.
It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to approve
the on-sale intoxicating liquor license with Sunday sales for Marcus West End, LLC – Ward 4.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent).
7. Regular business.
a. First reading of ordinance rescinding Ordinance No 2576-19 Efficient Building
Benchmarking
Ms. Ziring presented the staff report.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 5
Title: City council meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
Council Member Budd asked about the timeline from adoption to effective date, should the
ordinance be adopted. Ms. Ziring stated the ordinance would go into effect Jan. 1, then the
data collection window is opened, and then closed again on June 1.
Council Member Budd asked when this data collection report would go to the city and the
state.
Ms. Ziring stated data would be submitted to St. Louis Park through 2025 and then turned over
to the state beginning in 2026, assuming the city program continues for one year. The city
would opt into the state program in 2026 for all buildings.
Council Member Brausen stated he was a proponent of this program’s end being moved out a
year, even with the $30,000 cost. However, given the turn of events on the city’s budget for
2025, he asked if the $30,000 savings would be significant should the city wait to rescind the
ordinance until the following year.
Ms. Keller stated staff takes fiscal responsibility seriously and because the council wants to
remain at 8% or below the tax levy increase, the $30,000 savings would assist with that goal.
Council Member Brausen added 1% of a levy increase is about $400,000. Ms. Keller clarified
that 1% of an increase is closer to $500,000.
Council Member Baudhuin asked if the city rescinds the ordinance in 2025, how the savings
might be used. Ms. Keller stated staff has not discussed that, but noted Ms. Ziring may have
thoughts on reallocating staff time. Ms. Keller added that the $30,000 is budgeted for
contracted work, and that expenditure would simply be avoided.
Council Member Brausen asked how long the city has been benchmarking. Ms. Ziring
responded that it has been in place for five years. Council Member Brausen asked if the city has
been successful in recruiting building owners to make changes in energy efficiency. Ms. Ziring
stated it is difficult to determine correlation versus causation. While building owners have
access to energy data, and we know some properties have acted based on information found in
report cards, overall energy improvement results are inconclusive. She added there is no
specific trend line showing energy use has gone down since enactment.
Council Member Brausen stated the hope was to develop incentive programs for energy
efficiency and those have been enacted. Ms. Ziring agreed and said these programs will
continue with or without benchmark reporting.
Council Member Baudhuin asked if the benchmarking ordinance were to sunset in 2025, what
procedural requirements would be required. He also questioned whether the council should be
aware of any rule of procedure with two council members absent from this evening’s meeting.
Mr. Mattick said the process for sunsetting the ordinance would be to change its effective date
in the motion, requiring a minimum of four votes.
Mayor Mohamed stated given the conversations about the 2025 budget, the recommendation
seems like an effective way to save $30,000 for this year.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 6
Title: City council meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
Council Member Brausen shared that Council Member Rog was not in favor of a proposed levy
increase and he assumed she would support this recommendation as savings. He would
support rescinding the benchmarking ordinance as well.
Council Member Budd stated she will not support the recommendation as the benchmarking
ordinance was hard-fought to put in place. The past five years were difficult with the pandemic,
and data was difficult to collect and gauge. She pointed out that participation was 80% and
above from building owners, and that is a good sign, so she would hate to see this progress end.
She also observed that $30,000 is one-sixth of a percent of our city’s budget and is a small piece
that represents our climate action plan, so she will vote not to rescind the benchmarking
ordinance sooner than 2026.
Council Member Baudhuin added that the amount of money is a minuscule savings to the city.
He stated the results were ambiguous and owners said the energy improvements have nothing
to do with benchmarking and that they would have performed the improvements regardless of
city ordinance. He stated rescinding the ordinance saves $26,000 this year. Climate change
actions are slow, and he does not see how this would make an impact. If the city chooses to
sunset the ordinance, it is better to do it sooner rather than later to save money. He added he
is in favor of saving every penny.
Council Member Farris stated that she agreed with Council Member Baudhuin’s comments.
It was moved by Mayor Mohamed, seconded by Council Member Baudhuin, to amend
Ordinance No. 2576-19 to be rescinded effective Jan. 1, 2025, instead of Jan. 1, 2026.
The motion passed 4-1 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent, Council Member Budd
opposed).
It was moved by Council Member Baudhuin, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve
the first reading of Ordinance No. 2576-19, as amended, and set the second reading for Sept. 9,
2024.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent).
b. First reading of an ordinance amending city code chapters 34 and 36 regarding tree
preservation
Ms. Champoux presented the staff report.
Council Member Farris asked why the credit was limited to 50%.
Ms. Champoux clarified that the limit was set based on best practices observed in other cities;
staff can monitor over time and adjust as needed.
Council Member Brausen asked about additional resources for the forestry division to monitor
this issue. Mr. Walther stated that additional staff is proposed in the 2025 budget.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 7
Title: City council meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
Council Member Budd asked for clarification on what a subdivision is. Ms. Champoux stated it is
a property that is divided into other properties or being developed into additional lots.
Council Member Budd asked if the proposed amendment would apply to school properties. Mr.
Walther stated these rules are assigned to private trees only. The public tree counts will remain
the same, which is a one-for-one replacement of any significant tree.
Council Member Baudhuin thanked staff and stated he appreciates their work and the tree
canopy preservation, adding the canopy contributes to why people choose to buy homes in St.
Louis Park.
Council Member Brausen thanked staff and stated he will support the proposed ordinance. He
was an advocate for applying the policy to private property and single-family residential
properties, as tree loss is substantial in the city. Other communities have adopted similar
ordinances and require everyone to obtain a permit to remove a tree. He believes the city
should look at this type of requirement in the future as it is an urgent issue.
Council Member Budd added tree canopies are important to heat islands, and she will support
the proposed ordinance. She is glad the city will adopt this as policy.
It was moved by Council Member Baudhuin, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve
the first reading of ordinance amending city code chapters 34 and 36 regarding tree
preservation and set the second reading for Sept. 9, 2024.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent).
c. Resolution No. 24-101 awarding the sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2024B
Ms. Keller presented the staff report. She noted the final bond sale amounts. Instead of
$6,165,000, the city was able to prepay and only bond for $5,750,000, placing the city in a
stronger financial position long-term.
Council Member Brausen stated this bonding item is significant; the presentation is being made
publicly and transparently. The city does borrow funds, and, over time, future residents will pay
those costs. He stated the city’s AAA bond rating again resulted in favorable terms in the bond
sale. The bond rating reflects that the city is well-managed fiscally by an outstanding staff and
he noted the interest borrowing rate is 3.254507%. He observed that bonding is inexpensive
borrowing as a reflection of the city’s strong fiscal management, and he is supportive of this
item.
It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Budd, to adopt
Resolution No. 24-101, awarding the sale of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2024B, as
presented at $5,750,000.
The motion passed 5-0 (Council Members Dumalag and Rog absent).
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4a) Page 8
Title: City council meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
8. Communications and announcements.
• Ms. Keller stated the city pool closes Sun., Aug. 25.
• There are no council meetings scheduled for two weeks. The next meeting is Sept. 9, 2024.
• Mayor Mohamed noted the Minnesota State Fair opens later this week.
• Council Member Baudhuin noted the St. Louis Park Little League baseball team went to the
Midwest Little League Regional, and while they did not win, they won a few games. Sioux
Falls, SD, won and will represent the region. He congratulated the St. Louis Park team.
9. Adjournment.
The meeting adjourned at 7:46 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Minutes: 4b
Unofficial minutes
City council special study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Aug. 19, 2024
The meeting convened at 7:55 p.m.
Council members present: Mayor Nadia Mohamed, Paul Baudhuin, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd,
Yolanda Farris
Council members absent: Council Members Lynette Dumalag and Margaret Rog
Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), development planner (Mr. Walther), economic
development manager (Mr. Hunt)
Guests: Rick McKelvey and Evan Jacobson, Hempel Real Estate
Discussion items.
1. Development proposal for 5401 Gamble Drive – Ward 4.
Mr. Walther presented the staff report.
Council Member Brausen asked about the vacant parcel next to the 10 West End office tower.
Mr. Walther stated that parcel is planned for another 11-story office tower and the area north
of Gamble Drive has been part of an environmental assessment called an alternative urban
areawide assessment (AUAR). That has received preliminary city approval and is the last phase
of the overall West End development. He added the AUAR has been updated every five years.
Council Member Brausen noted utility and stormwater has been reviewed in the past and
stated there is adequate capacity for the uses in this area. Mr. Walther confirmed and added
the city has not studied this particular block south of Gamble Drive, noting sanitary sewer
begins northwest of the site and goes north to Golden Valley and another in Parkdale Drive that
goes east under Hwy 100. An environmental assessment will need to evaluate which section it
could connect to and would have capacity for this and potential future redevelopment of this
block.
Council Member Brausen asked if these office buildings are considered Class B. Mr. Walther
confirmed that they are. Council Member Brausen asked about the occupancy of the northwest
building. Mr. Walther introduced Mr. McKelvey, the Vice President of Development for Hempel
Real Estate. Mr. McKelvey stated the northwest building has occupancy below 50%.
Council Member Budd asked about the driveway and the private road indicated in the report.
Mr. Walther stated it is a right-in and right-out on Park Center Blvd.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
Council Member Brausen stated he supports the proposed redevelopment concept and policy
questions 1, 2 and 4, but is opposed to policy question 3 due to the drive-thru's climate
impacts.
Mr. McKelvey stated the coffee store with a drive-thru will pay twice the amount of rent, so the
bank will value that space at $2 million more because of the coffee store’s commitment to
dependable income. Mr. Walther stated the city assessor affirms this also.
Mr. McKelvey added there is a commitment from a grocery store for space at the development
as well. Mr. Walther stated this development and city financial assistance with TIF would be
subject to a green building standard, inclusionary housing policy requirements and DEI policy
goals.
Council Member Baudhuin asked if there is anything that would force a grocery store with an
employee union and are there any labor-related requirements included in this development.
Mr. Walther stated there is nothing in the TIF policy regarding employee unions as a
requirement.
Council Member Budd asked how the zoning at 5401 Gamble Drive would be affected. Mr.
Walther stated there is a special permit that covers all four of the office building parcels that
would require amendments. Mr. McKelvey stated the same owner owns all the office buildings,
so they are still in negotiations.
Council Member Budd asked about the green terraces and whether they qualify as green space.
Mr. Walther stated the terraces may qualify toward landscaping but would contribute to
designed outdoor recreation area, which must be 12% of the lot area.
Mr. Jacobson stated the terraces are integral to the identity of the project and its character. He
stated there will be a terrace with a pool or soaking tub and private spaces for residents of the
development. He added there will also be a green roof assembly.
Council Member Budd asked about TIF and the requested amount. Mr. Walther stated the
higher taxes paid by the property owner and collected following development, the increment, is
captured and disbursed back to the developer for qualifying extraordinary costs to help close
the gap. The development’s pro forma demonstrate the project could not proceed but for
financial assistance to close the gap. Council Member Budd asked if the TIF request would be
lower here. Mr. Hunt stated not necessarily, depending on the site’s extraordinary costs such as
poor structural soils, the high water table and other costs as well as the cost of the affordable
housing.
Council Member Budd asked if demolition of the existing structure is included in extraordinary
costs. Mr. Walther stated that would be an eligible expense, as the comparison is made to a
greenfield site. Council Member Budd asked if there would also be recycling of materials. Mr.
Walther stated yes as well as potentially salvage and reuse.
Council Member Brausen stated the current property taxes are $218,000 per year. He asked if
the city gets 36% of that. Mr. Hunt stated that was approximately correct, due to the fiscal
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Title: Special study session meeting minutes of August 19, 2024
disparities which shares tax revenues from commercial properties regionally, and noted mixed-
use developments pay considerably more property taxes than an office building.
Council Member Budd asked about 50% area median income units and if 30% AMI units may be
on the horizon. Mr. Hunt stated staff was currently in discussions with the developer on that
topic.
Council Member Baudhuin asked if there were no drive-thru, would making it financially
feasible come through TIF. Mr. Hunt stated the TIF assistance request would then likely be
higher.
Council Member Baudhuin stated he agrees with all the policy questions except for 3 and is
willing to consider 4.
Council Member Budd stated she agrees on 1, 2 and 3, and more to be determined on TIF.
Council Member Farris stated she agrees also on 1, 2 and 3, and more to be determined on TIF.
Mayor Mohamed stated she supports this and the development at West End. She supports the
policy questions as well, with more information expected to come.
Council Member Brausen asked what the maximum term on TIF was. Mr. Hunt stated 26 years,
but added the city’s TIF policy indicates the city’s preference is to stay under 15 years.
Communications/meeting check-in (verbal)
The meeting adjourned at 8:36 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Consent agenda item: 5a
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution establishing the employer contribution for
benefits in 2025.
Policy consideration: Does council approve the recommended amount of employer benefits
contribution for 2025?
Summary: This report details the city’s employee benefits planned for 2025, and staff’s
recommendation for setting the employer contribution for 2025. The recommendation follows
the funding philosophy adopted by the city in 2014 after several meetings and feedback from
an employee task force. The employer contribution funding philosophy is based on the
employer contribution for all plan options on the most utilized plan ($2500 deductible health
plan). It covers 100% of the premium for employee only coverage (plus additional funds for
voluntary elections for dental and deferred compensation).
For 2025, Health Partners will remain as our medical insurance vendor, Delta will remain as our
dental vendor, The Standard will remain our life insurance and Long-Term Disability (LTD)
vendor, and Sand Creek EAP will remain as our employe assistance program vendor. In 2023
staff went out to the market on our benefit vendors. For our medical insurance we secured a
two (2) year rate cap with our medical insurance provider of 11% and 12% for 2025 and 2026
respectively. For 2025 we have surpassed the 11% increase so our cap will kick in.
Financial or budget considerations: The amount recommended has been included in the 2025
budget.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution
Prepared by: Rita Vorpahl, HR director
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5a) Page 2
Title: Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
Discussion
Background: The city has an employee benefits committee that consists of employees
represented by all departments and all union groups. The purpose of the committee is to
educate employees on benefits and get feedback on what they are interested in seeing in our
benefits design. The benefits committee, along with our benefits consultant, assist with
gathering information and making recommendations on potential benefit designs or options.
They do not provide input on specific funding amounts for employer contribution. Annually,
staff conduct open enrollment for employees to make updates to the benefits they
choose. Below is a summary of the city’s benefit details.
Medical insurance (overall 11.84% premium increase with a cap of 11%)
The city has been insured through HealthPartners since 2012. Staff went out for a formal bid for
2023 which is required every five (5) years in accordance with state statute. Staff and our
benefit consultant are not surprised with these rates and will continue to monitor plans and
provide recommendations where appropriate to mitigate future costs.
Voluntary employees’ beneficiary association (VEBA) refresher
The city continues to offer a health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) with a VEBA funding
mechanism in coordination with the deductible health plans. The VEBA is funded with employer
contributions. Employer VEBA contributions are placed in a trust in an individual’s name and
funds are available for reimbursement of eligible medical expenses. VEBA funds not spent will
stay with the individual and roll over each year for future expenses. VEBA funds are set aside
tax-free, earn tax-free interest and qualified medical expenses are reimbursed tax-free. The
VEBA account stays with the individual after they leave employment and can be used for
reimbursement of qualified medical expenses, including premiums.
Dental insurance (0% increase in premiums)
They city has been insured with Delta Dental for many years and our consultant works closely
with them to secure the most favorable rates each year. Staff were fortunate to get a renewal
with 0.00% premium increase.
Life insurance (0% increase in premiums for basic life, no change for voluntary life)
A basic life insurance benefit is provided to all benefit-earning employees at 1.5 times their
salary, paid by the city. In 2024, the premium cost of the basic life was reduced by 7%, with a
three (3) year rate guarantee. Our rates will not change in 2025. Employees also have the
option to purchase additional supplemental insurance (up to $500,000), and spouse and
dependent life insurance as well. There is no change to the supplemental insurance rates or
plan design.
Long term disability (LTD) (0% increase to premiums)
Staff are pleased to continue to offer LTD to all staff at no cost to the employee. This benefit
provides income continuation at 60% of pre-disability earnings for anyone who becomes ill or
injured and unable to resume work after a six-month waiting period. In 2024, the premium cost
of the LTD was reduced by 25%, with a three (3) year rate guarantee. For 2025, we will not
experience an increase.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5a) Page 3
Title: Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
Deferred compensation (continue with current program; no change recommended)
The city offers several deferred compensation programs (457 plans). Deferred compensation is
a program that allows employees to invest today for retirement. This is a voluntary program for
employees, with an employer match of $10 per pay period to non-union staff with a minimum
employee contribution of $50 per pay period (Resolution 12-044). This benefit has also been
negotiated into union contracts.
2025 employer contribution recommendation
An extensive employee task force was convened in the summer of 2014 to review employee
input on employee benefit programs. The result of those meetings was a recommendation to
provide tiered employer contribution funding which provided more funding to those who elect
to insure dependents. All funding amounts are based on the city’s most utilized plan ($2500
deductible plan). In the funding philosophy, employees electing employee only coverage are
provided with a city contribution equal to 100% of the premium with leftover funds available so
employees could purchase voluntary benefits such as dental insurance and a $50/pay period
deferred compensation contribution. The monthly contribution for 2025 is $1,060 per month
for employees who choose employee only health insurance coverage. The city also contributes
$2500/year ($208.34/month) to employee only VEBA accounts, which is 100% of the
deductible.
The chart below shows total employee and employer costs per month for each plan option
offered. The “employee cost” noted on the right is the difference between the “employer
contribution” and the “premium”. The VEBA contribution cannot be used to offset premium
costs.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5a) Page 4
Title: Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
Employer VEBA
Contribution
Employer
Contribution
Employee
Cost 2025 PLAN OPTIONS Premium
Total
Employer
Contribution
$2,500 Employee $905.00 $1,060.00 $208.34 $1,268.34 -$155.00
Deductible Emp+Child(ren) $1,901.00 $1,425.00 $312.50 $1,737.50 $476.00
Open access Emp+Spouse $1,993.00 $1,495.00 $312.50 $1,807.50 $498.00
Family $2,534.50 $1,900.00 $312.50 $2,212.50 $634.50
$4,500 Employee $757.50 $1,060.00 $208.34 $1,268.34 -$302.50
Deductible Emp+Child(ren) $1,591.00 $1,425.00 $312.50 $1,737.50 $166.00
Open access Emp+Spouse $1,668.50 $1,495.00 $312.50 $1,807.50 $173.50
Family $2,122.00 $1,900.00 $312.50 $2,212.50 $222.00
$4,500 Employee $644.00 $1,060.00 $208.34 $ 1,178.34 -$416.00
Deductible Emp+Child(ren) $1,352.50 $1,425.00 $312.50 $ 1,597.50 -$72.50
Select Emp+Spouse $1,418.00 $1,495.00 $312.50 $ 1,657.50 -$77.00
Family $1,803.00 $1,900.00 $312.50 $ 2,027.50 -$97.00
$30 Employee $1,048.00 $1,060.00 -- $ 970.00 -$12.00
Co-Pay Emp+Child(ren) $2,200.50 $1,425.00 -- $ 1,285.00 $775.50
Open access Emp+Spouse $2,306.50 $1,495.00 -- $ 1,345.00 $811.50
Family $2,933.50 $1,900.00 -- $ 1,715.00 $1,033.50
Waive $155.00 -- $ 155.00 -$155.00
*Numbers in (red) indicate the amount employees have to purchase additional benefits.
Benefit-earning part-time employees regularly scheduled to work 20-29 hours per week will be
eligible to receive a pro-rated (50%) employer contribution, and full 100% employer VEBA
contribution. Employees who choose to waive coverage will be eligible for a reduced employer
contribution that may be used to purchase other supplemental benefits in the amount of $155
(pro-rated for part-time employees).
Additional benefit enhancements:
Flexible spending account: The amount staff can contribute to a medical flexible spending will
increase to the IRS maximum for 2025. Currently, our employees can contribute up to $2,400.
In 2024, the IRS maximum contribution limit is $3,200. Employees can set aside this pre-tax
amount for medical spending.
Paid parent leave: Effective Sept. 1, 2024, eligibility requirement for paid parental leave will
move from one year of service to six months, aligning it with our current short-term disability
plan. Our review of policies from other jurisdictions reveals that eligibility periods vary, with
some offering benefits (including paid parental leave) from the first day of employment up to
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5a) Page 5
Title: Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
one year. Adjusting our policy to six months will enhance our support for employees and ensure
we remain competitive in attracting and retaining talent.
Budget considerations: In initial budget projections, city staff had estimated an 13% increase in
premiums for 2024. The renewal provided a 11% increase for medical insurance. This amount
has been included in the budget projections. These numbers were included in the budget
report that was provided to council on July 15, 2024.
Next steps: Staff is pleased with the benefit programs that have been developed and
offered. Staff feel that the plans as outlined above will provide satisfactory and affordable
options for coverage based on individual needs. Approval is recommended.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5a) Page 6
Title: Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
Resolution No. 24-___
Establishing 2025 employer benefits contribution
Whereas, the city council has established a benefit plan that provides an effective means
for providing employee group benefits; and
Whereas, the city council establishes rates and plans for each calendar year; and
Whereas, the administration of such plans will be in accordance with plan documents as
approved by the city manager, who will also set policy and procedures for benefit level
classification and administration of plans,
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park:
1. Effective January 1, 2025, the monthly contribution of benefit dollars from the city for non-
union regular employees, including the city manager, who work at least 30 hours per week,
and who choose EMPLOYEE ONLY coverage be set at $1,060 per month, pro-rated for
regular part-time employees who work 20-29 hours per week.
2. Effective January 1, 2025, the monthly contribution of benefit dollars from the city for non-
union regular employees, including the city manager, who work at least 30 hours per week,
and who choose EMPLOYEE + CHILD(REN) coverage be set at $1,425 per month, pro-rated
for regular part-time employees who work 20-29 hours per week.
3. Effective January 1, 2025, the monthly contribution of benefit dollars from the city for non-
union regular employees, including the city manager, who work at least 30 hours per week,
and who choose EMPLOYEE + SPOUSE coverage be set at $1,495 per month, pro-rated for
regular part-time employees who work 20-29 hours per week.
4. Effective January 1, 2025, the monthly contribution of benefit dollars from the city for non-
union regular employees, including the city manager, who work at least 30 hours per week,
and who choose FAMILY coverage be set at $1,900 per month, pro-rated for regular part-
time employees who work 20-29 hours per week.
5. Effective January 1, 2025, employees who choose EMPLOYEE ONLY coverage on the
DEDUCTIBLE PLANS will be eligible for an employer VEBA contribution of $208.34 per month
($2,500/year).
6. Effective January 1, 2025, employees who choose EMPLOYEE+CHILD(REN),
EMPLOYEE+SPOUSE, or FAMILY coverage on the DEDUCTIBLE PLANS will be eligible for an
employer VEBA contribution of $312.50 per month ($3,750/year).
7. Effective January 1, 2025, the monthly contribution of benefit dollars from the city for non-
union regular employees, including the city manager, who work at least 30 hours per week,
and who WAIVE COVERAGE will be set at $155 per month, pro-rated for regular part-time
employees who work 20-29 hours per week.
8. The city will continue to administer other benefit programs.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5a) Page 7
Title: Resolution approving 2025 employer benefits contribution
9. The appropriate city officials are hereby authorized and directed to deduct the balance of
any sum premium from the compensation of an employee or officer and remit the
employee’s or officer’s share of any such premium to the insurer under an approved
contract.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September 16,
2024
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Consent agenda item: 5b
Executive summary
Title: Resolution appointing election workers for the Nov. 5, 2024 state general election
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution appointing election workers for the
November 5, 2024 state general election cycle.
Policy consideration: None – the city council is required to formally appoint election workers
under Minnesota election law and the St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter.
Summary: MN Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2 and St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter section 4.03
provide that election workers shall be appointed by the governing body of the municipality at
least 25 days before the election at which the workers will serve. The resolution identifies
individuals assigned to work at a precinct on Election Day, as well as individuals who will
conduct healthcare facility outreach voting prior to Election Day and serve on the city’s
absentee ballot board. All workers are required to complete a minimum of two hours of
training under state law. In St. Louis Park, many election workers attend multiple training
sessions (a total of four to six hours of training) because they serve in a leadership or other
specialized role on Election Day, or they assist with other elections services such as absentee
voting and health care facility outreach voting.
We are fortunate to have a very dedicated group of people who are ready to work and
committed to providing this vital service to St. Louis Park voters.
Financial or budget considerations: The 2024 budget includes the funds required to hire and
train election workers.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5b) Page 2
Title: Resolution appointing election workers for the Nov. 5, 2024 state general election
Resolution No. 24 - ___
Appointing election workers for the 2024 state general election
Whereas the state general election will be held on November 5, 2024, at the following
precinct locations:
•Ward 1 Precinct 1 - Beth El Synagogue, 5225 Barry St. W.
•Ward 1 Precinct 2 - Wat Thai of Minnesota, 2544 Hwy. 100 S.
•Ward 1 Precinct 3 - St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
•Ward 2 Precinct 4 - St. Louis Park Recreation Center, 3700 Monterey Dr.
•Ward 2 Precinct 5 - Vista Lutheran Church, 4003 Wooddale Ave. S.
•Ward 2 Precinct 6 - St. Louis Park Municipal Service Center, 7305 Oxford St.
•Ward 3 Precinct 7 - St. Louis Park Senior High School, 6425 33rd St. W.
•Ward 3 Precinct 8 - Aquila Elementary School, 8500 31st St. W.
•Ward 3 Precinct 9 - Lenox Community Center, 6715 Minnetonka Blvd.
•Ward 4 Precinct 10 - St. Louis Park Middle School, 2025 Texas Ave. S.
•Ward 4 Precinct 11 - Park Harbor Church, 1615 Texas Ave. S.
•Ward 4 Precinct 12 - Westwood Lutheran Church, 9001 Cedar Lake Road
Whereas as authorized by Minnesota Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2 and St. Louis Park Home
Rule Charter section 4.03, election workers for precincts shall be appointed by the governing
body of the municipality no later than 25 days before each election; and
Now therefore be it resolved by the St. Louis Park City Council that the individuals named
in Exhibit A and on file in the office of the city clerk are hereby appointed to serve as election
workers, absentee ballot board members, or alternate workers for the 2024 state primary
election; and
It is further resolved that as authorized under Minnesota Statute 204B.21, Subd. 2, the St.
Louis Park City Council also appoints all members appointed to the Hennepin County absentee
ballot board, under the direction of the Hennepin County Elections Director, to serve as
members of the St. Louis Park absentee ballot board; and
Be it further resolved that the city clerk is authorized to make any substitutions or
additions as deemed necessary.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September 16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Last Name First Middle Precinct
Abramson Betsy St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Ahrens Jane St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Anderson Patricia St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Arnold Anthony St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Austin Rachel St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Bakke Keith St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Bartels Kim St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Bartels Kim Healthcare Facility Outreach
Bartsch Nancy St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Belling Daniel Healthcare Facility Outreach
Benda Beatrice St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Benda Beatrice Healthcare Facility Outreach
Benson Janet St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Bergman Juli St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Bergman Juli AB Ballot Board
Bergquist Rogene St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Berkovitz Gary St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Botner Loren St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Braunstein Farrel St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Brimeyer Jim St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Brunia-Engels Melissa St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Brunia-Engels Melissa Healthcare Facility Outreach
Butterbaugh Laura St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Butterbaugh Laura Healthcare Facility Outreach
Campbell Patricia St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Carpenter Janet St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Chmura Delaney St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Church Wade St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Clarke Chris St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Colacci Elena St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Conery Mary Kaye St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Connell Thomas St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Conway Mary Kay St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Crouse Karyn St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Dahl Carolyn St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Davis Julia St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Davis Julia Healthcare Facility Outreach
Davis Nancy St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Desnick Sheila St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Dominguez Chelsa St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Drache Kay St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Dummer Bob St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Dummer Bob Healthcare Facility Outreach
Duncan Ben St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Dworsky Richard St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Engelking Jim St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Engelking Jim Healthcare Facility Outreach
Engelking Paula St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Ennenga Mark St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Erickson Richard St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Erlien Cathy St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Estes Robert St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Fischels Angela St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Flynn Mary E St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Fuller Sharon St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Geretz Alla St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Geretz Rafael Healthcare Facility Outreach
Gershone Jeffrey St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Gipp Stephan St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Grad Eitan St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Grad Eitan Healthcare Facility Outreach
Gremillion Kathy St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Grose Kathy St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Grose Lawrence St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Grose Lawrence AB Ballot Board
Gunderson Gerald St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Hakala Kyle St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Hakala Kyle Healthcare Facility Outreach
Hanson Stuart St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Hanson Wesley St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Hanson Wesley Healthcare Facility Outreach
Hendrickson Stephanie St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Hendrix Mary AB Ballot Board
Henningson Karin St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Hines Linda AB Ballot Board
Hjelmeland Joan Healthcare Facility Outreach
Hogg Heidi St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Hogg Heidi Healthcare Facility Outreach
Howard Arzella St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Howard Gena St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Hu Michele St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Huebner Jeff St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Hultgren Kellie St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Hyde Jenna St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Isenberg Chaiya St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Isenberg Chaiya Healthcare Facility Outreach
Jackson Aimee St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Jackson Aimee Healthcare Facility Outreach
Jaffee Jay St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Jensen Laura St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Jewell Jill St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Johnson Christine St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Jones-Klausing Janice St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Kaczmarek Amy St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Kenyon William St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Knighton Jessica St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Kohli Ishpreet St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Koster Erin St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Krause Marguerite St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Krinsky Polly St Louis Park W-1 P-03
LaFond Michael St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Lamon Leah Healthcare Facility Outreach
LaPray Jami St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Larson David St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Laskey Marjorie St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Laucher Linda St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Lee Martin St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Levin Trina St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Levin Trina Healthcare Facility Outreach
Lewin Ellen St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Lewin Ellen Healthcare Facility Outreach
Lieser Malisa St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Lieser Tim St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Lietzau Caitlin St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Lindstrom Julie St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Luckow Anna St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Macewicz Walter David St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Manuel Julie St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Manuel Julie Healthcare Facility Outreach
Marek Margaret St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Margolis Joseph St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Matko Ann R.St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Mattison Susanne St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Maynard Mary AB Ballot Board
Mcdonald Meredith St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Merfeld Amelia St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Metzker Kathy St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Meyer Carrie St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Miatech Joseph St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Miklos Brian St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Mohr Marvin St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Mohr Marvin Healthcare Facility Outreach
Mohr Marvin AB Ballot Board
Munoz Hernandez Kelly St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Murray Melissa St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Nachtwey Steve St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Nachtwey Steve Healthcare Facility Outreach
Nelson Marilyn Healthcare Facility Outreach
Nelson-Zilka Karne St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Nelson-Zilka Karne Healthcare Facility Outreach
Nordstrom Amy St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Obert Mary St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Oelschlaeger Karen St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Olson Karl St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Orton Lynn St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Osfar Barb St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Palmer Nancy St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Peltier Kay St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Penna Ross St Louis Park W-1 P-02
Penna Ross Healthcare Facility Outreach
Person Barbara St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Post Carol Healthcare Facility Outreach
Pretzer Nicole St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Priadka Kelly St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Ranallo Lonni St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Rand Dorothy St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Richards David St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Richards David Healthcare Facility Outreach
Rider Elaine St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Ritter Camille St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Rotert David St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Ruane Terry St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Ruhl Barbara St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Ruhl Barbara AB Ballot Board
Ruth Roger St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Ruttger Theresa St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Santa Susan St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Sanville Martha St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Scheig William St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Schingen Jesse St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Schlueter-Hynes Laurie St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Schreiner Irwin St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Schwartz Mark St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Schwieters Nicole St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Showalter Joy St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Sias Therese St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Simmons Judy St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Skytta-Gurkanlar Anna St Louis Park W-3 P-09
Solmer Henry St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Soucheray Mary (Gina)St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Steuer Meg St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Stevens Jeanne St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Svidal Katie St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Sweitzer Julie St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Sweitzer Julie AB Ballot Board
Tepley Karen St Louis Park W-3 P-08
Thompson Linda St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Thorne Elianna St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Thorne Rich St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Turk Carolyne St Louis Park W-1 P-03
Tursich Ernest St Louis Park W-2 P-06
Uhrig-Fox Dana St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Vos Rapoport Anne Monique St Louis Park W-4 P-11
Walker Alene St Louis Park W-4 P-10
Way Autumn St Louis Park W-2 P-04
Wickersham Mary AB Ballot Board
Wickersham Mary Healthcare Facility Outreach
Wilensky Barbara St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Wilhoit Christopher St Louis Park W-4 P-12
Williams Carole St Louis Park W-1 P-01
Wilson Sylvia St Louis Park W-2 P-05
Wirkkula Kati St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Witthuhn Jennifer St Louis Park W-3 P-07
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Consent agenda item: 5c
Executive summary
Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3920 France
Ave. South - Ward 2
Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the
repair of the sewer service line at 3920 France Ave. South, St. Louis Park, MN.
P.I.D. 07-028-24-11-0106.
Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by
the city council.
Summary: Carol Porter, owner of the single-family residence at 3920 France Ave. South, has
requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for her home and assess the
cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy.
The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or
sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put
into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like
this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed,
submitted and approved by city staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer
service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this
repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the city
to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible
cost of the repair has been determined to be $ 9,120.
Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special
assessment.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in
environmental stewardship.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Beth Holida, office assistant
Stacy M. Voelker, administrative coordinator
Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessing technician
Austin Holm, utilities superintendent
Jay Hall, public works director
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Page 2 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5c)
Title: Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3920 France Ave. South - Ward 2
Resolution No. 24 - ____
Authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the
sewer service line at 3920 France Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN
P.I.D. 07-028-24-11-0106
Whereas, the property owner at 3920 France Avenue South, has petitioned the City of
St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the
single family residence located at 3920 France Avenue South; and
Whereas, the property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of
notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
1.The petition from the property owner requesting the approval and special assessment for
the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted.
2.The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and
specifications approved by the public works department and department of inspections is
hereby accepted.
3.The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $9,120.00.
4.The property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal
from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by
other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5.The property owner has agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements
through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.5%.
6.The property owner has executed an agreement with the city and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of
all costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September 16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Consent agenda item: 5d
Executive summary
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and
Louisiana Avenue Improvements project (4024-1100) – Ward 4
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing condemnation of land for public
purposes – Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project (4024-1100).
Policy consideration: Does the council wish to authorize the use of eminent domain to ensure
the necessary land can be assembled to keep Phase 2 project on schedule for 2025 and 2026
construction?
Summary: On Feb. 6, 2023, the city council approved the preliminary layout for the Cedar Lake
Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project. The project phasing and schedule:
1.Cedar Lake Road rehabilitation (TH169 to Rhode Island Avenue) – project no. 4023-1100
o Construction 2024
2.Cedar Lake Road (Rhode Island Avenue to Kentucky Avenue) and Louisiana Avenue
rehabilitation (Wayzata Boulevard to BNSF railroad) – project no. 4024-1100
o Louisiana Avenue: Construction 2025
o Cedar Lake Road: Construction 2026
Additional information on this project and phasing is available in the Feb. 20, 2024 report.
With Phase 2 scheduled for construction in 2025 and 2025, the city's right of way consultant
has been working with the property owners to acquire the necessary easements. The project
team believes many of the properties will agree to the offers presented based on the appraisal.
Staff's goal is to not have to use eminent domain.
However, to keep Phase 2 of this project on schedule, the city attorney has recommended that
we begin the eminent domain process as a backup if needed. This will ensure that the project
can start in the spring of 2025 and achieve substantial completion by late fall of 2026.
Financial or budget considerations: The acquisition of land is included in the overall project
estimate and has been included in the city's capital improvement plan (CIP) for 2025 and 2026.
The project will be paid for using municipal state aid (MSA), utility funds, federal aid,
congressionally directed spending and state appropriation. The cost for the easements included
in this condemnation action is estimated to be $947,381.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion, Resolution, Easement layouts, Location map
Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Deb Heiser, engineering director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Page 2 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue
Improvements project (4024-1100) – Ward 4
Discussion
Background: On Feb. 6, 2023, the city council approved the preliminary layout for the Cedar
Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project. To construct this project as shown on
the approved layout, the city needs to acquire (purchase) both permanent and temporary
easements from private property owners.
What is eminent domain: Cities can acquire real property or easements through eminent
domain, also known as condemnation. Essentially, eminent domain is a means to require an
owner to sell land to a city to be used for a public purpose. This procedure requires a formal
court action, and a city must pay an owner for the value of the land and/or the damages to the
land - if the city is taking only part of it, such as for an easement.
Right of way acquisition activities: Construction of the approved layout for the project will
require the purchase of both temporary and permanent easements from 47 parcels adjacent to
the project area. These easements need to be acquired prior to the city being authorized to
solicit bids for the project.
Temporary easements are only needed for the duration of construction and will expire when
construction is complete. Permanent easements are needed for the construction of sidewalk
and cycle track.
The city's right of way consultant, SRF Consulting Group, has completed pre-acquisition
activities, which include the following:
•Property owner introductory letter, questionnaire and acquisition brochure
•Field title reviews
•Appraisals
•Parcel survey
•Conveyance document preparation
•Offer letters
The 44 properties have received offer letters for the easements. The project team believes
many of the properties will agree to the offers presented based on the appraisal. However, to
keep the project on schedule, the city attorney recommends the initiation of the eminent
domain process to ensure that the easements will be acquired in time for 2025 and 2026
construction. The first step in this process is council approval of a resolution authorizing
condemnation of land for public purposes. Approval of the resolution will allow for
condemnation by the quick-take method, which allows the city to obtain private property prior
to a final determination of compensation for the property. This method will only be used if
negotiations and subsequent acquisitions do not occur in a timely manner. Negotiations are
underway with property owners; the actual costs will not be known until property owner
settlements are finalized.
What follows is a summary of the parcel addresses, easement types, areas and estimated cost.
Page 3 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue
Improvements project (4024-1100) – Ward 4
Parcel
number Property address
Permanent
easement area
(square feet)
Temporary
easement area
(square feet)
Appraisal
39 2501 Rhode Island Ave 611 $ 800
40 2500 Quebec Ave S 292 594 $ 2,600
41 2501 Quebec Ave S 120 845 $ 1,900
42 7619 Cedar Lake Road 93 896 $ 1,700
43 2500 Pennsylvania Ave S 185 673 $ 5,831
44 2501 Pennsylvania Ave S 133 695 $ 1,700
45 2500 Oregon Ave S 25 644 $ 4,850
46 2501 Oregon Ave S 93 725 $ 3,500
47 7307 Cedar Lake Road 430 3569 $ 7,500
48 7239 Cedar Lake Road 1113 7798 $ 78,600
52 7101 23rd Street W 5007 10827 $ 290,600
53 2260 Kentucky Lane 1348 $ 2,300
54 7110 Cedar Lake Road 100 570 $ 1,500
55 7120 Cedar Lake Road $ 423,300
56 2267 Louisiana Ave 581 2375 $ 16,800
57 2257 Louisiana Ave 479 3255 $ 15,250
58 2249 Louisiana Ave 136 1345 $ 3,400
59 2235 Louisiana Ave 983 $ 2,000
60 2229 Louisiana Ave 1098 $ 3,050
61 2223 Louisiana Ave 864 $ 1,700
62 2219 Louisiana Ave 799 $ 1,400
63 2211 Louisiana Ave 549 $ 2,300
64 2207 Louisiana Ave 349 $ 6,100
65 2201 Louisiana Ave 391 $ 1,000
69 2037 Louisiana Ave 320 $ 1,100
70 2033 Louisiana Ave 600 $ 2,000
71 2023 Louisiana Ave 349 $ 1,200
72 2019 Louisiana Ave 400 $ 1,300
74 2013 Louisiana Ave 100 300 $ 2,500
75 2009 Louisiana Ave 140 260 $ 3,000
76 2005 Louisiana Ave 222 578 $ 3,800
77 1837 Louisiana Ave 49 783 $ 2,000
78 1829 Louisiana Ave 67 887 $ 2,600
79 1825 Louisiana Ave 550 $ 1,600
92 1477 Louisiana Ave 577 $ 1,300
93 1471 Louisiana Ave 725 $ 1,600
101 1409 Louisiana Ave 800 $ 1,400
102 1401 Louisiana Ave 105 1092 $ 2,100
103 1400 Louisiana Ave 38 505 $ 1,400
111 1600 Louisiana Ave 110 676 $ 4,300
112 1608 Louisiana Ave 476 727 $ 5,150
113 1612 Louisiana Ave 20 872 $ 1,700
126 7301 Louisiana Ave 395 1354 $ 9,150
Page 4 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue
Improvements project (4024-1100) – Ward 4
129 7200 Cedar Lake Road 3066 6521 $ 188,000
130 7316 Cedar Lake Road 416 2976 $ 6,600
131 2400 Nevada Ave S 32 224 $ 900
133 7624 Cedar Lake Road 565 2124 $ 11,000
Total $947,381
Financial or budget considerations: The cost for the easements included in this condemnation
action is estimated to be $947,381. The actual cost to obtain the easements necessary for this
project will not be known until all property owners have finalized negotiations. The acquisition
of all the permanent and temporary easements for Phase 2 of this project is estimated at
$1,498,292.
On Feb. 20, 2024, the city council report contained an estimate of $1,928,473 for property
acquisition for Phase 1 and Phase 2 of the Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue project.
Next steps: The project schedule for Phase 2 of this project is as follows:
File for easement condemnation at district court October 2024
90 percent plans complete October 2024
Open House November 2024
Phase 2 easement acquisition complete February 2025
Tree removal March 2025
Private utility relocations Phase 2 Spring 2025
Reconstruct Louisiana Avenue May - November 2025
Reconstruct Cedar Lake Road and the intersection of Cedar Lake Road
and Louisiana Avenue May - November 2026
Page 5 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue
Improvements project (4024-1100) – Ward 4
Resolution No. 24-___
Authorizing condemnation
of land for public purposes
Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park does hereby determine that it is
necessary and for a public use and purpose to acquire fee title and/or permanent and
temporary easements over the property legally described on the attached Exhibit "A", subject
to engineering modifications, if any, for purposes in connection with the Cedar Lake Road and
Louisiana Avenue Improvements project; and
Whereas, city staff and consultants have and will continue to work with the property
owners to acquire the necessary property; and
Whereas, the city council finds that construction timing makes it necessary to acquire
the necessary fee title and/or easements as soon as possible in order for the project to proceed
in an efficient, cost-effective and expeditious manner.
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
1.That the city attorney is authorized to commence eminent domain proceedings
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 117 to acquire the necessary fee title and/or
permanent and temporary easements over the properties identified on the attached Exhibit
"A", subject to engineering modifications, if needed.
2.That the city attorney is authorized to acquire the necessary property interests
pursuant to the "quick take" provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 117.042.
3.That the mayor and the city manager are authorized to execute all documents
necessary, in the opinion of the city attorney, to effect the acquisition of the necessary property
interests.
4.The city has obtained appraisals of the property being acquired and staff is
authorized to continue negotiating with the property owners relating to the acquisition of the
property and to acquire the property from the property owners by negotiation if possible.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September 16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Page 6 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue
Improvements project (4024-1100) – Ward 4
Exhibit "A"
Parcel
number Property address
Permanent
easement area
(square feet)
Temporary
easement area
(square feet)
Appraisal
39 2501 Rhode Island Ave 611 $ 800
40 2500 Quebec Ave S 292 594 $ 2,600
41 2501 Quebec Ave S 120 845 $ 1,900
42 7619 Cedar Lake Road 93 896 $ 1,700
43 2500 Pennsylvania Ave S 185 673 $ 5,831
44 2501 Pennsylvania Ave S 133 695 $ 1,700
45 2500 Oregon Ave S 25 644 $ 4,850
46 2501 Oregon Ave S 93 725 $ 3,500
47 7307 Cedar Lake Road 430 3569 $ 7,500
48 7239 Cedar Lake Road 1113 7798 $ 78,600
52 7101 23rd Street W 5007 10827 $ 290,600
53 2260 Kentucky Lane 1348 $ 2,300
54 7110 Cedar Lake Road 100 570 $ 1,500
55 7120 Cedar Lake Road $ 423,300
56 2267 Louisiana Ave 581 2375 $ 16,800
57 2257 Louisiana Ave 479 3255 $ 15,250
58 2249 Louisiana Ave 136 1345 $ 3,400
59 2235 Louisiana Ave 983 $ 2,000
60 2229 Louisiana Ave 1098 $ 3,050
61 2223 Louisiana Ave 864 $ 1,700
62 2219 Louisiana Ave 799 $ 1,400
63 2211 Louisiana Ave 549 $ 2,300
64 2207 Louisiana Ave 349 $ 6,100
65 2201 Louisiana Ave 391 $ 1,000
69 2037 Louisiana Ave 320 $ 1,100
70 2033 Louisiana Ave 600 $ 2,000
71 2023 Louisiana Ave 349 $ 1,200
72 2019 Louisiana Ave 400 $ 1,300
74 2013 Louisiana Ave 100 300 $ 2,500
75 2009 Louisiana Ave 140 260 $ 3,000
76 2005 Louisiana Ave 222 578 $ 3,800
77 1837 Louisiana Ave 49 783 $ 2,000
78 1829 Louisiana Ave 67 887 $ 2,600
79 1825 Louisiana Ave 550 $ 1,600
92 1477 Louisiana Ave 577 $ 1,300
93 1471 Louisiana Ave 725 $ 1,600
101 1409 Louisiana Ave 800 $ 1,400
102 1401 Louisiana Ave 105 1092 $ 2,100
103 1400 Louisiana Ave 38 505 $ 1,400
111 1600 Louisiana Ave 110 676 $ 4,300
Page 7 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue
Improvements project (4024-1100) – Ward 4
112 1608 Louisiana Ave 476 727 $ 5,150
113 1612 Louisiana Ave 20 872 $ 1,700
126 7301 Louisiana Ave 395 1354 $ 9,150
129 7200 Cedar Lake Road 3066 6521 $ 188,000
130 7316 Cedar Lake Road 416 2976 $ 6,600
131 2400 Nevada Ave S 32 224 $ 900
133 7624 Cedar Lake Road 565 2124 $ 11,000
Total $947,381
PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PROPERTY NUMBER
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT
NORTHNORTHNORTHLOUISIANA AVENUE
RIGHT-OF-WAY LAYOUT
APRIL 2024
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project (4024-1100) - Ward 4 Page 8
PERMANENT ROADWAY EASEMENT
TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT
PROPERTY NUMBER
EXISTING PROPERTY LINE
EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY
PROPOSED TEMPORARY EASEMENT
NORTH
NOR
T
H
CEDAR LAKE ROAD
RIGHT-OF-WAY LAYOUT
APRIL 2024
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d)
Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2 Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project (4024-1100) - Ward 4 Page 9
CEDAR LAKE R
D LOUISIANA AVE S22NDST W
18THST W
16THST W
CEDARMANOR LAKE
HANNAN LAKE VICTORIA LAKE
COBBLECREST LAKE
WESTWOODLAKE
WESTLING POND
Northside
Park
Lamplighter
Park
Cedar
Knoll Park
Westwood Hills
Nature Center
29TH ST W
MINNETONKA BLVDHIGHWAY 16914TH ST W
WAYZATABLVD
28TH ST WTEXASAVESINTERSTATE 394
27TH ST W
22ND ST W
CLUB RD
24TH ST W PENNSYLVANIA AVE SVIRGINIA CIR N
RHODE ISLAND AVE SFLAG AVE S25TH ST W
ZINRAN AVE SFRANKLINAVEW
VICTORIA W
AYUTAHDR
VIRGINIAAVESKENTUCKY AVESWESTWOOD HILLS
DRBURD PLWYOMINGAVESGETTY
S
BURGAVESQ
U
EB
E
C
A
V
E
S
OREGON AVE S18TH ST W
16TH ST W13THLNW
2 6 T H S T WHILLSBOROAVESFAIRWAYLN
BOONEAVES
JORDANAVESINDEPENDENCEAVESW ESTMORELANDLN
O
R
EGONCT13 1/2 ST W
QUEBECDR
AQUILAAVESMARYLAND AVE SNEVADA AVE SDECATUR AVE SVIRGINIA CIR S
22ND LN W
Y UKONAVES23RD ST W
T E X A TONKAAVEUTAH AVESCAVELL
A
VESSTANLEN RD
XYLONAVESEB I394 TOLOUISIANAAVE S
WESTWOODHILLSCURV0 0.5 10.25
Miles
Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements
Legend
2024 construction
2025-2026 construction
Municipal boundary
RHODEISLAND
A
VESSUMTERAVESCity council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5d) Title: Resolution to commence eminent domain action for Phase 2: Cedar Lake Road and Louisiana Avenue Improvements
project (4024-1100) - Ward 4 project (4024-1100) - Ward 4Page 10
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Consent agenda item: 5e
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving off-site gambling for Community Charities of MN
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution authorizing Community Charities of
Minnesota to conduct off-site gambling on September 21, 2024, at the St. Louis Park ROC, 3700
Monterey Drive.
Policy consideration: Does Community Charities of Minnesota meet the requirements to
conduct off-site gambling?
Summary: Community Charities of Minnesota applied to conduct off -site gambling in
connection with the “ROCtoberfest” event taking place at the St. Louis Park Recreation Outdoor
Center (ROC) on September 21, 2024. Community Charities of Minnesota currently holds a
premises permit to conduct lawful gambling in the city and will provide pull-tabs for this event.
State law provides that a licensed organization can conduct lawful gambling on a premises
other than the organization’s permitted premises. However, the city is required to approve the
off-site request for the organization to obtain the required permit from the State Gambling
Control Board.
Community Charities of Minnesota adheres to the laws associated with gambling and all
requirements have been met for issuance. Should the city council approve, the application and
resolution will be forwarded to the State Gambling Control Board who is resp onsible for issuing
the permit.
Financial or budget considerations: None.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk
Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Page 2 City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 5e)
Title: Resolution approving off-site gambling for Community Charities of MN
Resolution No. 24-___
Approving application for Community Charities of Minnesota to
conduct lawful gambling off premises at the ROC, 3700 Monterey Drive
September 21, 2024
Whereas all organizations applying for a lawful gambling permit must meet the criteria set
forth in St. Louis Park City Code, Chapter 15 relating to the location of lawful gambling
activities; and
Whereas a licensed organization may not conduct lawful gambling on a premises other
than the organization’s permitted premises unless it has first obtained approval as required
under state law and obtained approval from the State Gambling Control Board; and
Whereas the board may not issue an off-site permit for a licensed organization to conduct
lawful gambling for more than 12 events in a calendar year, not to exceed three (3) days per
event; and
Now therefore be it resolved, the above application has met the criteria necessary to
receive an off-site permit and the St. Louis Park City Council hereby approve the application.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September
16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Public hearing: 6a
Executive summary
Title: Resolution approving assessment of delinquent charges
Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and close the
public hearing. Motion to adopt Resolution to assess delinquent water, sewer, storm water,
refuse, abatement of tree removals, false alarms , mowing and citation charges against the
benefiting property.
Policy consideration: Does the city council desire to collect outstanding fees and charges
through the special assessment process?
Summary: The city certifies delinquent balances to Hennepin County as a means to collect on
these accounts. The certification is done via the special assessment process and becomes a lien
on the individual properties that is due over the next year or several years, depending on the
type of charge. Delinquent accounts relate to charges for water, sewer, storm water, refuse,
abatement of tree removals, tree pruning, false alarms, mowing and citations against the
benefiting property. To help mitigate the number of accounts that get certified, city staff work
with residents and businesses during the certification process and throughout the year to
resolve their outstanding balances by sending notices, answering questions on outstanding
account balances and providing information to residents on where they can find energy
assistance payment programs to help reduce the balance of their delinquent account.
Financial or budget considerations: Collection of these charges is vital to the financial stability
of the city’s utility systems and to reimburse the city for expenses incurred in providing
services. The certification process is also how the city is able to collect on delinquent account
receivable balances for services provided to specific propert ies, including mowing services, tree
removal service, false alarms, citations and other services.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution
Prepared by: Kaitlyn Finkel, accountant
Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 2
Title: Resolution approving assessment of delinquent charges
Discussion
Background: Each of the customers involved in the certification process received a city service.
Subsequently, the customers were then billed through one of our regular billing processes. The
invoice(s) is/are now past due, and the recommended method of collecting the past due
amounts is through certification as a special assessment to the property for the next year or
several years taxes, depending on the type of delinquency. In advance of the public hearing
date, individual letters were mailed to property owners advising them of the pend ing
assessment and their right to be heard before the city council. Per council policy, all delinquent
utility accounts have been assessed with a $15 administrative fee. This fee is not included in the
2024 amount below to provide consistent comparative data. The table below shows
comparison data from 2020 – 2024 in relation to the number of delinquent accounts or invoices
that received certification letters, and the total value of the delinquent amounts. The number
of “other delinquent balances” decreased this year correlating with a decline in private-tree
removals.
Year
Delinquent
Utility
Accounts
Other
Delinquent
Invoices
Beginning
Delinquent
Utility
Balances
Other
Beginning
Delinquent
Balances
Total
Beginning
Delinquent
Balances
Total Final
Certification
Amounts
2024 1147 187 $887,651 $95,871 $983,522 TBD
2023 1260 279 $957,779 $267,123 $1,224,902 TBD
2022 1259 190 $887,254 $130,519 $1,017,774 $457,384
2021 1288 114 $816,840 $33,676 $850,517 $450,046
2020 1,216 108 $714,136 $42,717 $756,853 $457,411
Each year, many residents and businesses pay their delinquent amount(s) before the
certification deadline, thereby reducing the final amount certified and sent to Hennepin
County. From the time the letters are sent out until the balances are due, there are several
hundred property owners who contact the city with questions about their outstanding
balance(s) and the certification process. In an effort to improve collection rates, staff also
expanded their attempts to contact property owners about their delinquent accounts by cross
referencing the customer data in our billing system with the owner data held in the county’s
property information system and sending duplicate letters to any new address we did not
already have on file. More specific data about the collection trends for utility accounts is
represented in the table below.
Year
Starting Cert
Totals
Accts Balance
Mid-Process
Totals
Accts Balance
Mid-Process
Collection %
Accts Balance
Ending Cert
Totals
Accts Balance
Ending
Collection %
Accts Balance
2024 1147 $887,651 TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
2023 1260 $957,779 858 $758,393 32% 21% 498 $470,425 60% 51%
2022 1259 $887,254 740 $604,599 41% 32% 486 $406,451 61% 54%
2021 1288 $816,840 794 $570,512 38% 30% 533 $407,562 59% 50%
2020 1216 $714,136 870 $605,164 28% 15% 543 $416,524 55% 42%
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 3
Title: Resolution approving assessment of delinquent charges
The amounts shown above do not include any added fees or interest. Customers have until Oct.
25, 2024, at 4:30 p.m. to pay their delinquent balances. A copy of the assessment roll is on file
with the City Clerk’s office for review.
In an effort to help residents find assistance for paying their delinquent utility balances, staff
added information directly to the utility certification letters that each resident received on a
resource that provides utility payment assistance to low-income households.
Present considerations: Collection of these charges is necessary to reimburse the city for
expenses incurred by providing services. Without collection for these charges, the cost would
be shifted to other rate-payers.
Next steps: After conducting the public hearing, the city council will take action by passing a
resolution to direct the assessment of delinquent water, sewer, storm water, refuse,
abatement of tree removals, false alarms, mowing and citations against the benefiting
property.
Staff will continue to collect payments related to the delinquent accounts and work with
residents to resolve issues related to their delinquent accounts. All delinquent accounts
outstanding as of Oct. 25, 2024, at 4:30 p.m. will be certified to Hennepin County for collection
as part of the owner’s property tax bill. Upon certification, the delinquent amounts will become
a lien on the individual properties.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 6a) Page 4
Title: Resolution approving assessment of delinquent charges
Resolution No. 24-____
Levying assessment for delinquent
utility accounts, tree removals, false alarms, mowing and citations
Whereas, the city council has heretofore determined by resolution or ordinance the
rates and charges for water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the city and has provided
for the abatement of tree removals, false alarms, mowing and citations to a home or business
shall be at the expense of the owners of the premises involved; and
Whereas, all such sums become delinquent and assessable against the property served
under Section 18-153, Section 18-154, Section 22-37, Section 32-34, Section 34-52, Section 34-
56, Section 32-97, Section 32-153, Section 34-111, and Section 34-112, of the St. Louis Park City
Code and Minnesota Statutes Sections 415.01, 366.011, 366.012, 429.061, 429.101, 443.015,
410.33, and 444.075; and
Whereas, Finance has prepared a list of unpaid charges to be certified against each tract
or parcel of land served by utilities, or against which tree removals, false alarms, mowing and
citations remain unpaid at the close of business on Oct. 25, 2024; and
Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park that said
assessment rolls are hereby adopted and approved, there is hereby levied and assessed against
each and every tract of land described therein an assessment in the amounts respectively
therein, and the city clerk is hereby authorized to deliver said assessment roll for amounts
unpaid at the close of business on Oct. 25, 2024, to the Auditor of Hennepin County for
collection of the assessment in the same manner as other municipal taxes are collected and
payment thereof enforced with interest from the date of this resolution at the rate of 5.5%
percent per annum; and
It is further resolved that said unpaid charges are hereby certified to the Auditor of
Hennepin County, and the chief financial officer is hereby authorized to deliver said list of unpaid
charges to the Auditor of Hennepin County, for collection in the same manner as other
municipal taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced with interest from the date of this
resolution.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September 16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Action agenda item: 7a
Executive summary
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general
industrial district
Recommended action: Motion to approve first reading of an ordinance amending the zoning
ordinance pertaining to breweries located in the I-G general industrial zoning district and set
second reading for Oct. 7, 2024.
Policy consideration: Should breweries in the I-G general industrial zoning district be allowed to
operate a taproom?
Summary: The applicant is Karl Eicher, owner of Haggard Barrel Brewing located at 6413
Cambridge Street. He is requesting a zoning text amendment to city code chapter 36, sections
36-244(b) and (c) to:
1. Remove brewery from the list of “permitted uses” in section 244(b).
2. Add brewery to the permitted with conditions list in section 36-244(c) with the following
condition:
a. Up to 25% of the gross floor area of the brewery may be used for any
combination of retail and taproom.
The city does not currently allow taprooms in the general industrial zoning district. It does,
however, allow distilleries to operate cocktail rooms. It is staff’s opinion that operating a
taproom in the general industrial zoning district is consistent with existing regulations that
allow distilleries to operate cocktail rooms in the I-G general industrial district.
While the applicant’s intent is to change the code so he can operate a taproom at the Haggard
Barrel Brewing, the city amendment would apply to all properties in the city that are zoned I-G
general industrial. The planning commission reviewed the proposed amendment in this
context. The planning commission conducted a public hearing on September 4, 2024. No
comments were received, and the planning commission recommended approval.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Discussion, zoning map, draft ordinance
Draft Sept. 4, 2024 planning commission minutes
Prepared by: Marcus Hansen, community development intern
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7a) Page 2
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general industrial district
Discussion
Background: The city allows breweries with taprooms in several districts. Below is a table
showing districts that currently allow taprooms in breweries and what conditions may be
required. The term “permitted with conditions” means it is allowed administratively if it meets
the conditions specific to that use.
Zoning district Taprooms in breweries Conditions
BP – business park Permitted with
conditions
a. The brewery shall not produce more
than 20,000 barrels of malt liquor per
year.
b. Up to 25% of the gross floor area of
the Brewery may be used for any
combination of retail and a taproom.
I-P – industrial park Permitted with
conditions
a. The brewery shall not produce more
than 20,000 barrels of malt liquor per
year.
b. Up to 15% of the gross floor area of
the Brewery may be used for any
combination of retail and a taproom.
I-G – general industrial Not permitted
MX-1 vertical mixed use Permitted with
conditions
a. The brewery shall not produce more
than 20,000 barrels of malt liquor per
year.
b. The maximum overall gross floor area
is limited to 20,000 square feet.
c. A taproom and/or retail outlet is
required and shall be located in the
Primary Street storefront of the
building.
d. The taproom and/or retail outlet shall
occupy a minimum of 20 percent of
the gross floor area with no maximum
limit.
e. Alcohol produced off-site shall not be
sold on-site, this includes both on-sale
and off-sale transactions.
f. This use may also include associated
facilities such as offices and small-
scale warehousing, but distribution is
limited to vans and small trucks.
Distribution access shall be from the
rear.
MX-2 neighborhood
mixed use
Permitted with
conditions
Same as MX-1 (listed above)
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7a) Page 3
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general industrial district
Present considerations: As indicated in the table, the conditions applicable to the taprooms
vary between the zoning districts. The conditions required in the mixed-use district, for
example, are the result of the intended purpose of that district, specifically walkable streets
with pedestrian oriented storefronts. The purpose of the mixed-use zoning district is not
consistent with the general industrial zoning district, and therefore some of the conditions
required in the mixed-use zoning district are not applicable to the general industrial zoning
district.
The general industrial zoning district is similar to the industrial park zoning district, therefore,
the conditions required for the general industrial zoning district should be more consistent with
the industrial park zoning district.
State statute allows taprooms at breweries that produce less than 250,000 barrels. This limit
has increased over the past few years from the initial amount of 20,000 barrels. Staff is
recommending not to include the condition limiting the total barrel production of the brewery
to 20,000 barrels, and instead, relying on the limit established in the state statute.
The approval of this Zoning text amendment will affect all I-G general industrial districts.
Attached is a map indicating the existing I-G districts highlighted in red.
Next steps: If the council approves the first reading, then the ordinance will be scheduled for a
second reading at the Oct. 7, 2024, city council meeting
Previous and future actions Governing body Date
Public hearing conducted. No comments were
received. Recommended approval (5-0 vote).
Planning commission 9/4/2024
First Reading of Zoning Text Amendment City Council 9/16/2024
Second Reading of Zoning Text Amendment City Council 10/7/2024
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7a) Page 4
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general industrial district
Zoning map
Properties zoned I-G general industrial are outlined and shaded in red.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7a) Page 5
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general industrial district
Ordinance No. _____ -24
Amending chapter 36 of the city code regarding breweries and
taprooms in the IG-General Industrial zoning district
The city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota does ordain:
Whereas, an application was received to amend chapter 36 pertaining to zoning, to
amend the regulations regarding breweries and taprooms in the IG-General Industrial zoning
district to allow taprooms as an accessory use to breweries, and
Whereas, the planning commission conducted a public hearing on September 4, 2024 on
the ordinance, and
Whereas, the city council considered the advice and recommendation of the planning
commission (case no. 24-17-ZA), and
Now, therefore be it resolved that the following amendments shall be made to the City
Code:
Section 1. Chapter 36, Section 36-244(b) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby
amended to remove the following struck-out text:
(14) Brewery.
Section 2. Chapter 36, Section 36-244(c) is hereby amended to add the following
underlined text:
(18)Brewery. The conditions are as follows:
a.Up to 25% of the gross floor area of the Brewery may be used for any
combination of retail and a taproom.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its passage and publication.
First Reading September 16, 2024
Second Reading October 7, 2024
Date of Publication October 17, 2024
Date Ordinance takes
effect
November 1, 2024
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council ___________:
By: __________________________________ By: __________________________________
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
____________________________________ _____________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren M. Mattick, city attorney
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7a) Page 6
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general industrial district
Planning commission
September 4, 2024
DRAFT Minutes
Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Katie Merten, Tom Weber, Jan Youngquist
Members absent: Matt Eckholm, Sylvie Hyman
Staff present: Gary Morrison, Sean Walther, Marcus Hansen
Guest: Karl Eicher, applicant and owner of Haggard Barrel Brewing
1. Call to order – roll call.
2. Approval of minutes – August 7, 2024, Regular meeting and Study Session minutes
Commissioner Eckholm noted a correction related to the condominium issue, which should
read: “Commissioner Eckholm added there is legislation proposed for more housing reform at
the state level to help push costs down for many people. Speaking to representatives could help
elevate the condominium building issue with a resolution on future housing reform legislation.”
Commissioner Beneke noted a correction on page 7 that should read: “Commissioner Beneke
stated he still has concerns that the zoning changes do not promote affordable owner-occupied
housing enough.”
Commissioner Beneke added a correction on page 8 which should read: “Commissioner Beneke
asked that staff outline more how the zoning changes could promote affordable owner-
occupied housing.”
It was moved by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Merten, to approve the Aug.
7, 2024, regular meeting and study session minutes with corrections. The motion passed
unanimously.
3. Hearings.
3a. Zoning Text Amendment – breweries with taprooms
Applicant: Karl Eicher
Case No: 24-17-ZA
Marcus Hansen, Community Development Intern, presented the report.
Commissioner Weber asked related to IG and why they are the only style not permitted at this
time. Mr. Hansen stated likely that small difference had not been addressed as yet, and no one
else asked for it.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7a) Page 7
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general industrial district
Mr. Walther added the city initiated allowing taprooms in the business district and then with
subsequent changes, there have been initiatives by the applicants, and an overall review will be
conducted next year.
Commissioner Beneke asked if any other breweries could be affected. Mr. Hansen stated no, in
the industrial general area this will be the first brewery affected. He added any future
breweries that come into IG zones will be able to have taprooms.
Chair Divecha asked about the decision not to limit the total barrel production to 20,000 and to
rely on the limit of the state which is 250,000. She asked for staff to explain that decision as it
would leave inconsistencies between the districts.
Mr. Walther stated previously this district allows breweries without a cap, so it is limited to
microbreweries, and since these changes have been adopted, the cap at the state has changed
multiple times, and the city’s zoning codes have not kept up with that. He added this has not
caused any concerns for existing breweries and that would be reviewed more broadly later, but
this change today is to allow this particular business to continue and to add a taproom.
Chair Divecha opened the public hearing.
There were no speakers from the public.
Chair Divecha closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Youngquist stated this is important for small businesses in St. Louis Park and
noted the IG zone is the only place where a taproom is not allowed, which puts this brewery
owner at an extreme disadvantage in St. Louis Park and the metro area as most general
industrial zones with breweries do allow taprooms.
Commissioner Younguist added when the zoning code is changed, the city has to look at all
implications to the zoning district. She noted the typical hours a taproom is open- usually
evenings and weekends- is the opposite of industrial uses in these zones, so potential concerns
about trucks and other industrial items are reduced. She stated this could provide the potential
for shared parking in the future and she said she will support this.
Commissioner Merten stated they do allow distilleries to operate cocktail rooms so why not
allow breweries to operate taprooms, noting it makes sense and she will support it.
Commissioner Weber thanked Mr. Hansen for presenting and invited him to return to St. Louis
Park in the future.
It was moved by Commissioner Merten, seconded by Commissioner Youngquist, to approve the
zoning text amendment allowing taprooms in the IG general industrial zoning district as
recommended by staff. The motion passed unanimously.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7a) Page 8
Title: First reading of zoning text amendment - breweries with taprooms in the I-G general industrial district
4. Other Business – none.
5. Communications.
Mr. Walther noted following the regular meeting there is a study session on the zoning code
update and uses allowed in the proposed zoning code districts. He added several boards and
commissions have openings for new members and the council is scheduled to make
appointments by Oct. 21, and as of Nov. 1, the outcome of those appointments will be known.
Mr. Walther stated an appeal of the BOZA zoning decision was received and will be brought
forward in November.
Mr. Walther stated the next planning commission meeting is Sept. 18 with a proposed addition
at Aquila Elementary School. He stated the October meeting will be on Oct. 9 due to Rosh
Hoshana.
Mr. Walther stated that the planning commission's presentation to the council will be on
October 28, along with all of the other statutory boards and commissions, including the
planning commission, BOZA, and the Housing Authority.
6. Adjournment – 6:16 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Sean Walther, liaison Mia Divecha, chair member
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Action agenda item: 7b
Executive summary
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolutions approving 2025 preliminary property tax
levy
Policy consideration: Does council support the revised preliminary property tax levy payable in
2025 of $49,979,665, a 7.52% increase from 2024, made up of the following components:
• $48,598,532 for core government services and debt payments (general and debt service
levies)
• $1,194,133 for housing projects and programs (HRA levy)
• $187,000 for economic development projects and programs (EDA levy)
Summary: This report is unchanged from the Sept. 9, 2024 agenda packet. After several council
study sessions focused on the budget this summer, staff presented council a recommended
budget and corresponding all-inclusive levy increase of 9%. Staff received feedback that was
generally supportive of the new spending items, but uncomfortable with the all-inclusive levy
increase of 9%. This report lays out a revised budget that lowers the levy increase to 7.52%. This
budget assumes:
• Maintenance of the city’s current service levels and the operating increases discussed
on July 15, 2024.
• Moving the roof replacement of the Municipal Service Center project in the capital
funds to a future year and not responding in 2025 to streets showing signs of
delamination.
• Utilizing fund balance rather than any levy revenue to cover the potential replacement
of pool gutters in 2025.
• Eliminating the city’s energy benchmarking program in recognition of a new state
program.
This increase would result in a 6.6% increase in property taxes for a homesteaded median value
($377,200) home in St. Louis Park. This works out to an increase of $109 dollars a year or $9
dollars a month.
Financial or budget considerations: 2025 proposed budget and long-range financial plan
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution (General levy)
Resolution (HRA levy)
Resolution (EDA levy)
Prepared by: Amelia Cruver, finance director
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 2
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Discussion
Background: Staff presented council a recommended budget and corresponding all-inclusive
levy increase of 9% on Aug. 12, 2024. The budget included funding for base spending on
existing people and programs, some adjustments to the budget to move ongoing spending back
to the general fund instead of one-time funding sources, new initiatives and programs to
support strategic priorities, and the capital budget. At that meeting, staff received feedback
that was generally supportive of the new spending items, but uncomfortable with the all-
inclusive levy increase of 9%. Staff was provided with direction to cut the recommended budget
by approximately one levy percentage point.
Present considerations
Staff began working on a revised proposal that reduced the levy and maintained funding for key
programs and services. In completing this work, staff sought to uphold the following principles:
• Maintain existing programs and follow current city policies.
• Changes in funding should be made after understanding the impact to racial equity.
• Prioritize funds for new programs on items with a high impact on city priorities.
• All changes to the budget should consider both the impact on the 2025 tax levy, and
also the long-term costs and risks associated with the change.
This report will lay out a staff recommended budget and associated levy, proposed changes to
the budget and impact of those changes, and options for council refinement. Staff’s updated
proposed budget has an all-inclusive levy increase of 7.52%.
Changes to initial budget recommendation
Using the State of Minnesota energy benchmarking program. Council recently decided to
utilize the state’s new energy benchmarking program starting in 2025 rather than continuing to
fund and administer the city’s benchmarking program. This will result in $26,000 in savings for
the benchmarking help desk contract in the 2025 general fund budget and levy, as well as a
shift in staff resources to other projects.
Moving and rescoping the Municipal Service Center roof project. In the CIP presented to
council on Aug. 12, 2024, the Municipal Infrastructure Fund supported phase 1 of a 3 phase
project to replace the roof at the MSC. After receiving quotes for the project, staff now believes
that the roof can wait to be replaced for a few years. In addition, facilities staff would prefer to
replace the entire roof in one year, rather than spread the work out over three. The length of
the asset life and dollar amount for the now one-year project make it a good candidate for
bond funding. In the revised CIP, the roof replacement project has been moved from a three-
phase project at $500k each year funded through the capital levy, to a one-time project in 2027
funded through borrowing. A modest amount of funding will be kept in the budget for 2025 to
manage any repairs that may be needed until the full replacement.
Utilizing more fund balance in the Park Improvement Fund. In the CIP presented to council on
Aug. 12, 2024, $350,000 was included for replacing the pool gutters at the aquatic park. At the
same time, the city is investigating the need for and potential timing of a replacement or major
renovation of the pool. Unfortunately, the feasibility study will not be completed in time to
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 3
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
inform the 2025 maximum levy. However, the city will have the results of this feasibility study
before a gutter replacement project commences. To manage this uncertainty, staff is
recommending that the project remain in the CIP, but that it is budgeted as a fund balance
expense, rather than being supported by the levy. The use of fund balance in the Park
Improvement is increased from $200,000 to $350,000 in the revised proposal. If the gutters are
determined to not be needed in 2025, the city will retain the $350,000 in the fund balance to
be used in future budget processes.
Removing delamination response. The unexpected delamination of some city streets has been
the topic of several city council discussions and staff reports. In April 2024, council provided
staff direction for staff to explore including delamination response in future budget processes.
Following this direction, staff priced out a response plan and included it in the initial CIP
presented Aug. 12, 2024. After a robust discussion council did not reach a consensus on if the
value gained by addressing delamination warranted the expense.
In an effort to move the conversation forward ahead of the preliminary levy adoption on Sept.
16, this report will review the initial staff recommendation and rationale to not address
delamination at this time.
Staff is recommending not including funding to address delamination based on the following
rationale:
1. Road maintenance and replacement in the CIP is determined based on road condition.
While delamination is unsightly, there is not a clear impact on the fundamental
condition of the road. Engineering already prioritizes the roads with the worst structural
condition to be addressed each year to meet funding constraints. In 2025, the city is
reaching the limit of our franchise fee revenue and will need to seek adjustments to the
franchise fees moving forward to keep pace with the current plan for road maintenance
that relies on road condition information. Adding delamination to the budget in 2025
will create a CIP that funds maintenance and repair for roads in 2025 that are in better
structural condition than roads several years out in the plan.
2. A condition-driven planning process is the most equitable way to budget street
improvements. Road condition is an objective measure that can be used without bias
across a geographical area. Basing planning and funding decisions off of complaints
introduces privilege and bias to the process as there are often inequities in which
residents feel comfortable making complaints or contacting public officials.
3. Making the decision to address streets that show signs of delamination would create a
new expectation, if not a new policy, that the city would incorporate this work into
future CIP’s. Residents along the remaining 26 miles of streets at risk for delamination
would likely expect the same treatment on their streets as was provided to their
neighbors. This means the current $3.5 million estimate to address delamination is the
floor, not the ceiling, of funds required. Adding a delamination response to the 2025
budget would add risk, as well as cost, to the long-range financial plan.
Should council determine that any of these revised budget components are not in keeping with
their desired 2025 budget, staff will revise the CIP and associated levy needs accordingly.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 4
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Revised Levy
Recommended 2025 Levy
Fund 2024
Adopted
Change 2025
Proposed
Percentage
Change
General Fund $34,147,654 $4,661,161 $38,808,815 14%
Capital Replacement Fund $2,177,793 $45,703 $2,223,496 2%
Park Improvement Fund $860,000 -$350,000 $510,000 -41%
Employee Benefits Fund $200,000 $200,000 0%
Subtotal General Levies $37,385,447 $4,356,865 $41,742,311 12%
Debt Service Levy $6,362,813 $493,408 $6,856,221 8%
General and Debt Service Levies $43,748,260 $4,850,273 $48,598,532 11%
Housing Redevelopment Authority
Levy
$1,744,133 -$550,000 $1,194,133 -32%
Economic Development Authority
Levy
$877,000 -$690,000 $187,000 -79%
Total Property Tax Levy $46,483,749 $3,495,916 $49,979,665 7.52%
Updates to the 5-year outlook
In addition to the changes listed above, staff has increased the growth assumptions in the base
budget from 4.5% to 5% based on recent years’ experiences. This will be revised each year
using actual information on personnel costs and salary increases, increases in the cost of our
benefits, changes to non-tax revenues and the cost to maintain our current service level.
In order to accommodate for the additional fund balance usage if pool gutters are required, the
tax levy for the park improvement fund is raised back to 2024 levels over two years and the
capital improvement levy is increased each year with the goal of closing our structural deficit by
2029. The size and cadence of these increases should be adjusted after the city updates the TIF
management report in the fall to take advantage of any expansions to the tax base in the
coming five years.
The below forecast includes funding for current programs and those proposed as a part of the
2025 budget process and any known increases in costs but does not include any spending on
new or expanded programs in the future. Increases to staff or program expansions will lead to
larger than projected levy increases. In that same vein, these projections include our current,
best forecasts for non-tax revenue. Should economic conditions change, non-tax revenues will
change and that will also impact the demand on the levy in a given year.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 5
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Five-year Financial Outlook
Fund 2024
Adopted
2025
Proposed
2026
Forecast
2027
Forecast
2028
Forecast
2029
Forecast
General Fund $34,147,654 $38,808,815 $40,749,256 $43,176,719 $45,335,555 $47,602,333
Capital Replacement Fund $2,177,793 $2,223,496 $2,557,020 $3,068,424 $3,835,531 $4,410,860
Park Improvement Fund $860,000 $510,000 $700,000 $860,000 $860,000 $860,000
Employee Benefits Fund $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000 $200,000
Subtotal General Levies $37,385,447 $41,742,311 $44,206,277 $47,305,143 $50,231,086 $53,073,193
Debt Service Levy $6,362,813 $6,856,221 $7,523,750 $7,566,453 $8,139,875 $8,690,269
General and Debt Service
Levies
$43,748,260 $48,598,532 $51,730,027 $54,871,596 $58,370,961 $61,763,462
HRA Levy $1,744,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133 $1,194,133
EDA Levy $877,000 $187,000 $374,000 $374,000 $374,000 $374,000
Total Property Tax Levy $46,483,749 $49,979,665 $53,298,159 $56,439,729 $59,939,093 $63,331,595
Total Levy Growth 7.52% 6.64% 5.89% 6.20% 5.66%
Staff will continue to work to reduce the overall levy increase by analyzing duplicative budget
lines, verifying revenue forecasts and looking for additional outside revenues and will report
back to council in mid-November on progress.
Property Tax Impact
The table below shows the impact to the median property by type of a 7.52% levy increase. On
top of the changes in value year to year, State policy changes reduced the tax rate for
homestead properties and reduced the tax rate on Class C, 4D properties. This led to another
shift, on top of the variable changes in value across the property types.
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 6
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Next Steps
On Sept. 16, 2024, city council will approve the 2025 preliminary maximum levy. Staff
recommends the budget and associated 7.52% levy increase detailed in this report, with the
understanding that staff will continue to work towards lowering the final levy that is approved
in December 2024.
7.52% Levy Impact
2024 2025
Percent
Change 24
to 25
Annual
Increase
Monthly
Increase
Median
Est.
Market
Value
Property
Tax
Payable
Median
Est.
Market
Value
Property
Tax
Payable
Single-Family
Homestead $373,300 $1,646 $377,200 $1,755 6.60% $108.71 $9.06
Non-Hmstd $373,300 $1,663 $377,200 $1,816 9.21% $153.15 $12.76
Condominium
Homestead $208,800 $848 $203,900 $846 -0.24%-$2.00 -$0.17
Non-Hmstd $208,800 $930 $203,900 $981 5.55% $51.58 $4.30
Townhome
Homestead $260,700 $1,100 $252,200 $1,099 -0.05%-$0.53 -$0.04
Non-Hmstd $260,700 $1,161 $252,200 $1,214 4.56% $52.93 $4.41
Apartments
Class A $280,500 $1,562 $280,000 $1,685 7.89% $123.21 $10.27
Class B $192,200 $1,070 $185,000 $1,113 4.03% $43.16 $3.60
Class C $124,000 $690 $123,900 $745 8.00% $55.19 $4.60
Class A (4D-1) $280,500 $937 $280,000 $337 -64.0%-$599.97 -$50.00
Class C (4D-1) $124,000 $414 $123,900 $149 -64.00%-$265.08 -$22.09
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 7
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Resolution No. 24-____
Approving 2025 preliminary property tax levy, and setting public hearing date
for the 2025 budget and final property tax levy
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by Charter and state law to approve a
resolution setting forth an annual tax levy to the Hennepin County Auditor; and
Whereas, Minnesota Statutes require approval of a preliminary property tax levy on or
before September 30th of each year; and
Whereas, the city council has received the proposed budget information; and
Whereas, after the approval of the proposed EDA and HRA levies by the EDA and city
council in addition to the general and debt service levies below, the overall preliminary levy
increase will be 7.52 percent
Now therefore be it resolved that the truth in taxation public hearing will be held on
December 2, 2024; and
It is further resolved that the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County,
Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for collection in 2025 upon the taxable
property in said City of St. Louis Park for the following purposes:
2024 2025
adopted proposed
Tax capacity-based tax
levy levy levy
General $37,385,447 $41,742,311
Debt service 6,362,813 6,856,221
Total $43,748,260 $48,598,532
Be it further resolved that the chief financial officer is hereby authorized and directed
to transmit this information to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota and the
Minnesota Department of Revenue, if applicable, in the format requested as required by law.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September
16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 8
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Resolution No. 24-___
Authorizing the preliminary HRA levy for 2025
Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the “EDA Act”),
the city council of the City of St. Louis Park created the St. Louis Park Economic Development
Authority (the "Authority"); and
Whereas, pursuant to the EDA Act, the city council granted to the Authority all of the
powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of the
Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and
Whereas, Section 469.033, subdivision 6 of the Act authorizes the Authority to levy a tax
upon all taxable property within the city to be expended for the purposes authorized by the HRA
Act; and
Whereas, such levy may be in an amount not to exceed 0.0185 percent of estimated
market value of the city; and
Whereas, the Authority has filed its budget for the special benefit levy in accordance with
the budget procedures of the city in the amount of $1,194,133 and
Whereas, based upon such budgets the Authority will levy all or such portion of the
authorized levy as it deems necessary and proper;
Now therefore be it resolved by the St. Louis Park City Council that approval is hereby
given for the Authority to levy, for taxes payable in 2025, such tax upon the taxable property of
the city as the Authority may determine, subject to the limitations contained in the HRA Act.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September
16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
City council meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 7b) Page 9
Title: Resolutions to adopt 2025 preliminary property tax levy certification
Resolution No. 24-_____
Authorizing a present intent to levy a tax for Economic
Development Authority purposes pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.107
Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 through 469.1082, as
amended (the “Act”), the city established the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the
“EDA”); and
Whereas, Section 469.107, subdivision 1 of the Act authorizes the city, at the request of
the EDA, to levy and collect a tax of up to 0.01813% of the estimated market value of taxable
property within the city, levied upon all taxable real property within the city, for economic
development purposes; and
Whereas, the EDA has requested that the city approve such a levy in the amount of
$187,000 and the city finds that such a levy is in the best interest of the city and EDA because it will
facilitate economic development,
Now therefore be it resolved that the city council of St. Louis Park hereby approves the
levy of a tax for economic development purposes pursuant to Section 469.107, subdivision 1 of
the Act in the amount equal to $187,000 with respect to taxes payable in calendar year 2025.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council September
16, 2024:
Kim Keller, city manager Nadia Mohamed, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Discussion item: 1
Executive summary
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion
Recommended action: There is no action being requested today, this item is for discussion
purposes only.
Policy consideration: The council will discuss the following questions with representatives of
the city’s five advisory board and commissions:
1. What has each commission been working on in 2024?
2. What does it mean to be advisory to council, and how can council best support your
commission in the future?
Summary: The city council expressed a desire to play a more significant role with boards and
commissions. In response, staff has organized a conversation with the five advisory boards and
commissions as the start of new opportunities and interactions between the council and boards
and commissions.
The goal of this conversation is for the council to hear from boards and commissions what they
are working on and how they might work together better going forward. The insights gathered
will help council members set future priorities for them.
A second conversation with the same purpose is scheduled to take place in October, 2024 with
the city’s statutory boards (planning commission, zoning board of adjustments and housing
authority).
Financial or budget considerations: No, there are no financial or budget considerations for this
item.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Appendix A: Advisory boards and commissions current workplans
Prepared by: Pat Coleman, community engagement coordinator
Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion
Discussion
Background:
During a study session on May 20, 2024, council members discussed the following policy
consideration: How should the council provide policy direction to advisory boards and
commissions? This question stemmed from previous council directives, where members
expressed a desire to play a more significant role with boards and commissions. A key part of
the discussion focused on the nature and frequency of interactions between the council and
the advisory bodies. As the conversation evolved from past practices to exploring new
opportunities for engagement, the following points emerged:
•The council agreed on holding an annual meeting with boards and commissions to
discuss priorities.
•The council supported one-on-one meetings with commissions to discuss their systems
approach and work plans.
Several factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and a recent redesign project, influenced the
changes in past interactions. Now that the council has made a final decision on the redesign
project, board and commission members have expressed a need for more engagement with the
council to feel they are effectively fulfilling their advisory roles.
Present considerations:
Today’s study session will serve as the start of new opportunities for interaction between the
council and members of the city’s five advisory boards and commissions: human rights
commission, environment and sustainability commission, police advisory commission,
community technology advisory commission, and parks and recreation commission. The
discussion will center on the following questions:
1.What has each commission been working on in 2024?
2.What does it mean to be advisory to council, and how can council best support your
commission in the future?
This meeting will feature a roundtable format with one representative from each advisory
board and commission. Each commission will be given time to share what their group has been
working on in 2024. Then as a group will discuss what it means to be advisory to council. The
insights and details gathered from this discussion will provide the council with essential
guidance as they set priorities for the boards and commissions later this year.
Next steps:
A second conversation with the same purpose will be held in October 2024 with the statutory
boards and commissions.
Based upon the direction provided by council during these two discussions, staff will
incorporate the information to the design of the annual priority setting meeting with the
council and boards and commissions that will be held later this year. The priority setting
meeting will in turn, provide guidance to board and commission members as they are
developing their 2025 work plans.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion
In 2025, boards will begin their annual one on one conversation with the council. Staff is in the
process of developing the 2025 systems calendar and will provide schedule to the council and
board and commissions later this fall.
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan 2024
1
Work Plan Template│ Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Time
Frame
Initiative Strategic
Priorities
Purpose
(see page 2 for definitions)
Outcome (fill in after
completed)
1st
quarter
Update on Boards and Commissions ☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative
☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☐ 5 ☒
N/A
☐Commission Initiated Project
☒Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
The commission was kept
apprised of the boards and
commission study which
resulted in no changes.
2nd
quarter
Association Presidential Summit ☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☒ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
In partnership with the school
district, a summit meeting was
held May 7, and the fall meeting
will be held Nov. 13.
3rd
quarter
Minnehaha Creek clean-up: Fall ☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☒ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☐ 5 ☐
N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
The Minnehaha Creek fall
clean-up is scheduled for Oct. 5
behind the Municipal Service
Center.
3rd
quarter
Review and provide input on Webster
Park master plan process.
☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☒ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
Staff to obtain property.
3rd
quarter
Host annual staff appreciation event ☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☒ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
The annual staff appreciation
event will be held Oct. 9 at
Westwood Hills Nature Center.
Monthly Invite Youth Associations and other
community groups to discuss
opportunities and successes monthly.
Invite staff members for updates and/or
introduction (new staff).
☐New
Initiative☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☒1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☐ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project☐Council Initiated Project☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
The Traveling Baseball
Association as well as various
staff members attended.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 4
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan Approved:
Updated:
2
City of St. Louis Park Strategic Priorities
1.St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
2.St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
5.St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
OR Other
As
needed
Encourage Commissioners to volunteer
at special events such as ShamROC Ice
Bowling, UGLY Sweater Dash, Penny
Carnival, ROCtoberfest, and other
opportunities that arise.
☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☒ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 5
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan Approved:
Updated:
3
Purpose: definitions
Modifications:
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
•Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
•If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
•The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
•Project initiated by the board or commission
Commission Initiated Project
•Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Council Initiated Project
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and report its findings or comments to the city council in
writing
•No direct action is taken by the board/commission
Report Findings
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and makes a formal recommendation to the city council on
what action to take
•A recommendation requires a majoirty of the commissioners' support
Formal Recommandation
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 6
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan Approved:
Updated:
4
Parking Lot
Items that are being considered by the board/commission but not proposed in the annual work plan. Council approval is needed if the
board/commission decides they would like to move forward with an initiative.
Initiative Comments:
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 7
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan Approved: TBD, 2024
Updated:
1
Work Plan │ Human Rights Commission
City of St. Louis Park Strategic Priorities
1.St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
2.St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
5.St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
OR Other
Time
Frame
Initiative Strategic
Priorities
Purpose
(see page 2 for definitions)
Outcome (fill in after
completed)
1st
Quarter
Neighborhood grant program ☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☒1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☐ 5☐N/A
☐Commission Initiated Project
☒Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
4th
Quarter
Cashless business and unbanked policy ☒New Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☒1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☐ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
3rd
Quarter
Children’s first literacy festival ☒New Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☒1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☒ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
Commission members tabled at the
children’s first literacy festival to
engage with the community, share
voting information, and recruit for
current community engagement
opportunity prospects.
4th
Quarter
Human Rights Commission Awards ☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3☐4 ☒ 5☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 8
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: TBD, 2024
Updated:
2
Purpose: definitions
Modifications:
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
•Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
•If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
•Project initiated by the board or commission
Commission Initiated Project
•Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Council Initiated Project
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and report its findings or comments to the city council in
writing
•No direct action is taken by the board/commission
Report Findings
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and makes a formal recommendation to the city council on
what action to take
•A recommendation requires a majoirty of the commissioners' support
Formal Recommendation
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 9
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan Approved: TBD, 2024
Updated:
3
•The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
Parking Lot
Items that are being considered by the board/commission but not proposed in the annual work plan. Council approval is needed if the
board/commission decides they would like to move forward with an initiative.
Initiative Comments:
LGBTQIA+ allyship (mental
health resources and
resources)
Commission is interested in seeking allyship with the LGBTQIA+ community citywide to continue to
understand their challenges and work alongside them to promote equity and inclusion.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 10
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: TBD
Updated: July 10, 2019
1
Work Plan Template│ community technology advisory commission
Time
Frame
Initiative Strategic
Priorities
Purpose
(see page 2 for definitions)
Outcome (fill in after
completed)
4Q 2019 Establish committees to research
technologies, providers, implementation
issues and risks.
☐New Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative
☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☐ 5 ☒
N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
•Community engagement
committee established and
meeting regularly
•Technical committee to be
established at Oct. 30, 2019,
meeting to address a specific
initiative
•Three committees established in
late 2020 for three smart city
areas: GIS, environment and
connected communities.
3Q-4Q
2019
Attend meetings of other city boards
and commissions to learn how
technology might help their activities
and related city services
☒New Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative
☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☐ 5 ☒
N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
•Did not happen due to the
pandemic and change in
commission direction to focus
on smart cities.
•Collaborated with city staff on
smart cities workshop in
October 2020; continued to
work collaboratively with city
staff as appropriate to develop
smart city projects.
3Q-4Q
2019
Connect with similar commissions from
other agencies
☒New Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative
☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☐ 5 ☒
N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
•Commission has been provided
with League of Minnesota Cities
contacts to research activities of
other Minnesota cities.
•Commission has modeled some
activities on similar commissions
in Tacoma and Seattle, Wash.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 11
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: TBD
Updated:
2
City of St. Louis Park Strategic Priorities
•Commission has met with school
district to understand
technology access needs.
•City staff and commission
members have contacted
broadband providers to
understand their plans around
access and equity in technology.
3Q 2019 Develop a plan for community
engagement. Determine methods for
informed public input on activities and
priorities.
☒New Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative
☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☒ 5
☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☐Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
•Community engagement
committee has contacted local
private school Benilde-St.
Margaret, resulting in
recruitment of a youth member
for the commission (Theo
Pohlen)
•Committee developed an online
survey for residents to help the
commission understand what
the needs/wants are of the
community. Survey was not
deployed due to concerns that it
was equipment focused rather
than access focused; and
limitations of what the
commission can solve.
•Commission researched possible
venues for in-person focus
groups in early 2020.
•Work continues in 2021 as part
of committee work for smart
cities.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 12
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: TBD
Updated:
3
1.St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive com munity for all.
2.St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safel y and reliably.
5.St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
OR Other
Purpose: definitions
•Project initiated by the board or commission
Commission Initiated Project
•Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Council Initiated Project
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and report its findings or comments to the city council in
writing
•No direct action is taken by the board/commission
Report Findings
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and makes a formal recommendation to the city council on
what action to take
•A recommendation requires a majoirty of the commissioners' support
Formal Recommandation
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 13
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: TBD
Updated:
4
Modifications:
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
•Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
•If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff l iaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
•The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
Parking Lot
Items that are being considered by the board/commission but not proposed in the annual work plan. Council approval is needed if the
board/commission decides they would like to move forward with an initiative.
Initiative Comments:
Produce a quarterly report
for the city council of
relevant technology
activities and advances.
Commission has provided a report and/or met with city council in January, March and June 2021.
Produce final reports on
completed commission
activities, with
recommendations for
consideration by other
commissions or by the city
council.
June 14, 2021, study session report
March 8, 2021, study session report
March 8, 2021, study session minutes
January 25, 2021, study session report
Enhance the commission’s
presence on the city
website.
Commission website continues to be kept up to date with member information, agendas and minutes.
Provide analysis of
proposed or considered
technology for the
community and city
In 2020, the community technology advisory commission began exploring how the concept and practice of smart
cities might be applied in St. Louis Park. Following a delay due to the COVID -19 pandemic, the project kicked off
with an October workshop for commission members and city staff.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 14
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: TBD
Updated:
5
operations and provide
recommendations and
feedback to staff, the city
council and other
commissions.
At the workshop, Insight staff helped participants understand the concept and practice of smart cities, defined in
this case as application of technology to improve quality of life. Potential use cases (applications) as defined by
pre-workshop survey results were prioritized against both measurable benefits and the council’s strategic
priorities. Three main themes emerged: connected community, environment and geographic information system
(GIS)-enabled applications.
Committees that included commission members, city staff, the city’s GIS account manager and Insight staff were
established for each theme. The committees developed charters outlining goals, methods, initial tasks and
opportunities for investigation, included in the Jan. 25, 2021, report to the city council.
Since then, the committees have worked with Insight facilitators and city staff to create use case definitions.
These definitions outline project goals, potential benefits and limitations, scope and impact for the prospective
initiatives. The committee chairs presented highlights of the use cases at the March 8, 2021 city council study
session and will follow up at the June 14, 2021 city council study session.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 15
Environment and Sustainability Commission
Amplify the Impact: our 2023 Work Plan
The City of St. Louis Park has significant and expanding programs to meet our Climate Action Plan goals,
yet the mere presence of these programs will not achieve these goals. We need to empower more of
our residents, workers, and visitors to take advantage of these programs. There are also limits to what
we as a single city can do on our own. For example, the city does not have the authority to go beyond
the state building code.
To “Amplify the Impact” and achieve our community goal of carbon neutrality by 2040, the Environment
and Sustainability Commission will:
A.Expand our Outreach
a.Build relationships with community-based organizations, SLP city commissions and
other groups to engage stakeholders typically not engaged in climate conversations, and
to reach those most vulnerable to climate change.
b.Collaborate with staff to update existing materials and engagement kits to use at events,
for outreach, etc.
c.Assist in identifying candidate sites for new programs in a multifamily or business
setting.
d.Help organize and participate in new and existing events to educate and engage the St.
Louis Park community.
e.Empower commission members to act as ambassadors for various local, state, and
federal sustainability programs such as city incentive programs, energy assistance
providers and Inflation Reduction Act provisions.
B.Share our Voice
a.Continue communication between council, staff and the ESC on CAP goals as advisors of
the work, and discuss possible opportunity areas.
b.Dialogue with community and advisory organizations in other Minnesota cities on policy
collaboration.
c.Identify statewide policies that will help us meet our CAP and justice goals.
d.Advocate through written communications and public testimony as appropriate.
C.Measure our Progress
a.Review quarterly updates on metrics that track participation in incentive programs
(provided by staff) as well as community member engagement at events (provided by
ESC volunteers).
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 16
2023 Annual Report, Pg. 1/3
Police Advisory Commission (PAC)
(Presented in 2024)
I.2023 Goals and Key Initiatives:
●Onboarding new members.
●Monthly discussion and updates from staff liaison on PD hiring, promotions,
major training developments, and police policy/procedure manual updates.
●Monthly discussion and updates from staff liaison on calls for service types/
totals, major incidents, in-progress investigations appropriate for community
input or knowledge, regional crime trends, violent crime info, highlights on drug
overdoses and domestic violence.
●Monthly public info sharing on bias crime occurrences in SLP and discussion of
patterns. PAC members also requested to know if those committing bias crimes
are typically community members, or external actors.
●Group members worked with consultants and city staff to provide feedback and
input into a revisioning of city commissions.
●Community surveys on satisfaction with public safety services discussed
throughout 2023.
●Ongoing discussion of outreach to other Minnesota cities on PAC work and
opportunities for collaboration.
II.2024 Goals:
a.Outreach to other cities’ public safety-related boards/commissions with an
emphasis on building relationships which allow us to share experiences and best
practices.
b.Community engagement and listening sessions to offer a safe space for open
dialogue focused on building strong networks of relationships and
communication pathways.
c.Review and update bylaws for submission to the City Council.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 17
2023 Annual Report, Pg. 2/3
Police Advisory Commission (PAC)
(Presented in 2024)
d. Continue to advocate for launching a community survey. PAC members
approved and submitted a letter requesting the survey be forwarded to the
City Council at the June 7, 2023, meeting.
II.Race Equity and Inclusion:
a.Focus on and inclusion of race/demographic data in Use of Force dashboard
project.
b.Tailored proposed survey questions to assess community perceptions related to
SLP PD’s diversity, equity, & inclusivity.
c.Continue to review monthly bias crime reports.
d.Community engagement and listening sessions to offer a safe space for open
dialogue focused on building strong networks of relationships and
communication pathways.
III.Strategic Priorities:
●St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to
create a more just and inclusive community for all.
o Focus on and inclusion of race/demographic data in Use of Force dashboard
project.
o Tailored proposed survey questions to assess community perceptions related to
SLP PD’s diversity, equity, & inclusivity.
o Continue to review monthly bias crime reports.
o Community engagement and listening sessions to offer a safe space for open
dialogue focused on building strong networks of relationships and
communication pathways.
●St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 18
2023 Annual Report, Pg. 3/3
Police Advisory Commission (PAC)
(Presented in 2024)
o While the SLP PAC does not currently have oversight of anything pertaining to
environmental stewardship, we welcome any opportunity to review relevant
potential future policy proposals related to SLP PD operations with a focus on
minimizing or eliminating environmental impact.
●St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood-
oriented development.
o As matters pertaining to housing options and neighborhood development are
most appropriately addressed by numerous other commissions/boards
(Planning, Housing Authority, etc.), the PAC does not currently engage in any
specific work related to this strategic priority.
●St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their
way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
o While we are not currently engaged in any specific initiatives pertaining to this
strategic priority, we look forward to feedback from the community survey and
listening sessions to determine how we may best address community needs
related to safety and comfortability.
●St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through
community engagement.
o Community-wide survey and public listening sessions to offer a safe space for
open dialogue/feedback focused on building strong networks of relationships
and communication pathways.
(Reviewed and approved by vote of the Commission at its regular meeting, Wed. 4.3.24.)
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 1)
Title: Advisory boards and commissions annual meeting preparation discussion Page 19
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Written report: 2
Executive summary
Title: MnDOT I-394 and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project - next steps – Ward 4
Recommended action: No action at this time. This report provides responses to the questions
presented by the community and council at the Sept. 9, 2024 city council meeting. To provide
MnDOT time to respond to questions from the community, this item will now be brought back
to the city council on Oct. 7, 2024 for decision instead of Sept. 16 as presented during the Sept.
9 meeting.
Policy consideration: Does the city council support MnDOT's proposed work on I-394 and
Louisiana Avenue?
Summary: In 2025, MnDOT has improvements proposed for I-394 and Louisiana Avenue,
including:
• I-394 eastbound land extension. To build this project, they require the permanent
dedication of a portion of the city right of way on Wayzata B oulevard to MnDOT.
• Construct extension of general-purpose lane on eastbound I-394 from Louisiana Avenue
exit ramp to Louisiana Avenue entrance ramp.
• Construct a new auxiliary lane from the eastbound Louisiana Avenue on -ramp to the
Xenia Avenue/Park Place Boulevard exit.
• Replace I-394 and Louisiana Avenue north and south ramp signal systems.
• Remove channelized right turns at the I-394 and Louisiana Avenue north and south
ramp intersections.
• Sidewalk improvements.
• Relocate the city watermain on Wayzata Boulevard between 500 feet west of Dakota
Avenue and Dakota Avenue.
The city's approval is required for this project because it increases highway traffic capacity on I-
394 and requires acquisition of permanent rights in two areas along Wayzata B oulevard, a city-
owned street.
During the Sept. 9, 2024, council meeting, the public and council had several questions. The
questions fall into two categories: questions for city staff and questions for MnDOT. The
questions and responses are included in the discussion section and attached.
Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the city's draft 2025 capital
improvement plan (CIP). This is a MnDOT project with an overall cost estimated to be $3.65
million. The city's cost share is $250,000, which will be paid for using municipal state aid funds.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion, MnDOT responses
Public hearing council report Sept. 9, 2024
Prepared by: Debra Heiser, engineering director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Title: MnDOT I-394 and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project - next steps – Ward 4
Discussion
Background: In 2025, MnDOT has improvements proposed for I-394 and Louisiana Avenue. The
city's approval is required for this project because it increases highway traffic capacity on I -394
and requires acquisition of permanent rights in two areas along Wayzata B oulevard, a city-
owned street.
In addition to the expansion of the highway capacity, this project also includes the
reconstruction of the signal at the eastbound I-394 and Louisiana Avenue ramps. Operation,
maintenance and replacement of this signal is covered by an agreement with MnDOT. As laid
out in the agreement, the city is obligated to participate in signal replacement costs based on
the number of legs of the signal under our jurisdiction. Due to this, the city is obligated to pay
for half of the cost to replace this signal system.
Information on the route identification, public engagement and selection of a recommended
route can be found in the Sept. 9, 2024 council report.
Community feedback: The public was able to comment during the Sept. 9, 2024, council
meeting. The questions from the public and from council members fall into two categories:
questions for city staff and questions for MnDOT. The following is a summary of questions and
responses from city staff. MnDOT's questions and responses are attached.
1. How is biking being accommodated with this project?
There are no bikeway improvements proposed with this project. It is a MnDOT-led
project with the intent to add a lane on the mainline of I-394 where there is currently a
lane drop/add between the US 169/General Mills B oulevard and Louisiana Avenue
ramps. Doing this required MnDOT to realign the eastbound Louisiana Avenue ramps,
prompting the reconstruction of the traffic signals. There are no proposed structural
modifications to the bridge as a part of this project.
The Louisiana bridge over I-394 was built in 1988 and is in good shape. Due to this, the
bridge isn't in any plans to be replaced. The bridge carries about 20,000 vehicles a day,
and the recommended bikeway design would be a separated facility. There is not
adequate room on the bridge to create a separated facility. For safety reasons, city staff
does not recommend adding a stripe to the road to designate a space for bicycles as an
interim measure.
In addition, there is no bikeway north of Louisiana Avenue in Golden Valley. While a
bikeway is in Golden Valley's master plan, they do not have it in their CIP.
2. How many lanes will the new Louisiana Avenue have after it is reconstructed?
In 2025, Louisiana Avenue, between Wayzata Boulevard and Fire Station #2, will be
reconstructed. The new street will have one lane of traffic in each direction. There will
also be a new continuous sidewalk constructed along the east side of the road. This is in
addition to the existing sidewalk on the west side of the road. City staff is working
closely with MnDOT to coordinate the work on the city 's project with their project.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 3
Title: MnDOT I-394 and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project - next steps – Ward 4
Present considerations: During the public hearing there were many questions from the public
regarding what modifications MnDOT would be making to the highway as well as the ramps.
During the meeting, MnDOT went through the project layout to describe the improvements.
However, there was not adequate time or exhibits to do this in a comprehensive way.
To provide this information more comprehensively, MnDOT has agreed to hold a public open
house to further discuss the details of the project with the public. Date, time and location
details will be forthcoming. City staff will assist MnDOT in getting the word out for this meeting.
To provide time to hold this meeting, this item will not return to the council for decision until
Oct. 7, 2024.
In addition, MnDOT's presentation from the Sept. 9 meeting is now included on the webpage
that the city created for this project.
Next steps: The proposed schedule for MnDOT's project:
Public open house September 2024 (date to be determined)
Council project approval Oct. 7, 2024
Construction August 2025
Construction complete November 2025
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 4
Title: MnDOT I-394 and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project - next steps – Ward 4
Attachment – MnDOT responses
1. How is biking being accommodated with this project?
There are no bikeway improvements proposed with this project. It is a MnDOT-led
project with the intent to add a lane on the mainline of I-394 where there is currently a
lane drop/add between the US 169/General Mills B oulevard and Louisiana Avenue
ramps. Doing this required MnDOT to realign the eastbound Louisiana Avenue ramps,
prompting the reconstruction of the traffic signals. There are no proposed structural
modifications to the bridge as a part of this project.
2. Design plan document states that the project is being motivated by congestion data
from 2016 (8 years ago). Is this data still accurate today (in 2024)?
Correct, the project need was identified based upon the 2016 MnDOT Metro Freeway
Congestion Report. However, the 2023 MnDOT Metro Freeway Congestion Report
shows similar congestion on I-394 in the vicinity of Louisiana Avenue. Traffic volumes
today on I-394 are within 10% of those in 2016.
Additionally, interstate vehicle detector data indicates that the morning traffic slow-
downs on I-394 in this area seen in 2016 remain today. On average there is one to two
hours of congestion in the AM peak hours.
3. Why is the speed limit (60mph) lower than the design speed (70mph) on 394?
Shouldn't roads be designed to communicate what speed is safe to drivers without a
speed limit sign?
The scope of this project will not impact existing speed limits or design speeds on I -394.
4. What community engagement has taken place for this project?
There will be an open house this fall to further discuss details of the project with the
public. Date, time and location details will be forthcoming.
5. Will MnDOT include leading pedestrian interval for upgraded signal systems and
crossings?
Yes, this can be implemented with the installation of the new traffic signals.
6. Will MnDOT add a "no right turn on red" to discourage drivers driving into the
pedestrian crossing. Include restrictions during peak times ?
The "No Right Turn on Red" signs are typically only installed in locations where there is
limited visibility for vehicles turning right. In locations where these signs are not
warranted due to site lines, they are often violated by drivers. The "No Right Turn on
Red" would not necessarily address people encroaching on the crosswalk.
7. Is the Louisiana Ave bridge going to be wider?
There are no proposed structural modifications to the bridge included in the scope of
this project.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 2) Page 5
Title: MnDOT I-394 and Louisiana Avenue Improvements project - next steps – Ward 4
8. What is the timeline for construction? Is Wayzata Boulevard going to be closed? What
will be the detour routes?
Construction will occur from August to November 2025. The off -ramp and on-ramp of
eastbound I-394 and Louisiana Avenue will be closed for the duration of the project.
Entering/ exiting traffic will be rerouted to General Mills Boulevard to the west and
Xenia Avenue/ Park Place Boulevard to the east.
Design is ongoing for the watermain relocation on Wayzata B oulevard and the traffic
control and staging will follow. The contractor will be required to maintain access to
businesses throughout construction. More information will be communicated to
businesses as the project develops.
Meeting: Special study session
Meeting date: September 16, 2024
Written report: 3
Executive summary
Title: Cannabis zoning ordinance
Recommended action: The purpose of this report is to provide information to aid in council’s
discussion and subsequent actions related to the proposed cannabis zoning regulations.
Policy consideration:
• Does city council support the proposed zoning regulations for cannabis operation?
• Does city council support limiting the number of cannabis retailers permitted within the
city?
Summary: St. Louis Park City Council supported legalizing medical and recreational marijuana.
The city’s regulatory approach to this industry seeks to provide safe, convenient and equitable
access for adult-use. The regulations intend to protect children and youth and mitigate
potential negative impacts for the neighborhoods where these businesses operate. Council
indicated that regulatory approaches similar to on- and off-sale liquor and lower-potency hemp
products are appropriate models, with some additional controls because this is a new industry.
In 2023, the State of Minnesota passed legislation to legalize adult use of cannabis which
included the creation of the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) to oversee the regulation
of commercial production and sale of cannabis and related products. Municipalities have the
ability to enact regulations related to the zoning, local registration and enforcement of state
regulations regarding cannabis sales. OCM will not finalize some regulations until 2025.
Staff recommend the city permit cannabis retailers with conditions in the C-2, MX-1 and MX-2
zoning districts, along with the existing planned unit developments that allow liquor stores.
Staff recommend these businesses be at least 1,000 feet from a school, another cannabis
retailer and other specified commercial uses. Staff suggest limiting the number of cannabis
retailers to locate within the city to one retailer per 12,500 residents.
Also, staff recommend the city permit, with conditions, cannabis operations in the I-G zoning
district, provided they are at least 1,000 feet from a school and other cannabis operations.
Financial or budget considerations: None related to adopting zoning regulations.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity
and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: November 20, 2023 city council special study session minutes,
August 7, 2024 planning commission study session minutes
Prepared by: Katelyn Champoux, associate planner
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager / deputy community development director
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Cindy Walsh, deputy city manager
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Title: Cannabis zoning ordinance
Discussion
Background:
In 2023, the State of Minnesota passed legislation to legalize adult use of cannabis which
included the creation of the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) to oversee the regulation
of commercial production and sale of cannabis and related products. The OCM is working
through the formal rulemaking process to implement the regulatory framework for the adult-
use cannabis industry established by the legislation. The agency plans to publish a notice of
intent to adopt rules later this year, which will prompt a 30-day formal comment period.
Municipalities have the ability to enact regulations related to the zoning, local registration and
enforcement of state regulations regarding cannabis sales. Cities may impose reasonable
restrictions on the time, place and manner of land use activities. The restrictions typically
include:
1. The location (e.g. zoning districts) where the use is allowed.
2. The review and approval process such as administrative (e.g. permitted by right,
permitted with conditions) or quasi-judicial (e.g. conditional use permit).
3. Specific standards and conditions that would mitigate potential nuisances, and health
and safety concerns that may accompany the use.
4. The manner such uses may operate, such as limited hours of operation and/or distance
separation requirements from other uses.
The legislation allows local governments to enact buffers for cannabis retailers up to 1,000 feet
from schools and/or up to 500 feet from residential treatment facilities, athletic facilities,
attractions within a public park and childcare facilities.
Local governments that register cannabis retailers may also limit the number of cannabis
retailers allowed within their jurisdiction, but they must allow for at least one retail location per
12,500 residents. According to the State Demographer population estimates from 2022 and
guidance from the OCM, this would equate to a minimum of four retail locations for St. Louis
Park.
As part of the state licensing process, the OCM will notify a local government when an applicant
intends to operate within their jurisdiction and request certification of zoning compliance. Local
governments must complete this certification within 30 days of receiving a copy of an
application from OCM. If the OCM does not receive a response within 30 days, the legislation
allows the OCM to move forward with issuing the license. The city zoning approval/certification
can only be achieved in that timeframe through an administrative process.
Previous considerations:
In 2023, the city enacted a moratorium on cannabis-related businesses to protect the planning
process as it researches and considers zoning controls for cannabis products and related
activities. It is anticipated that the city will adopt zoning regulations for cannabis businesses
prior to the end of 2024 so that they may go into effect on Jan. 1, 2025.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3) Page 3
Title: Cannabis zoning ordinance
City council previously discussed zoning regulations for the sale of lower potency hemp
products and cannabis products for on- and off-site consumption and provided policy direction
to staff. Last month, the planning commission reviewed and provided feedback on the
proposed cannabis zoning regulations. Commissioners did not indicate concerns for the
proposed districts in which to allow cannabis businesses nor the buffers between cannabis
businesses and other uses.
The following sections outline the proposed regulations given city council direction for previous
policy questions related to the sale of lower potency hemp products and cannabis products.
Proposed regulations for off-sale and on-sale of lower potency hemp products
As directed by city council, staff recommend maintaining the existing regulations for the off-
sale and on-sale of lower potency hemp products. These regulations allow the sale of lower
potency hemp products at any place of business where retail, food or beverage sales occur
under the condition that they are located more than 300 feet from a school and have the
appropriate licenses and registrations. Food and beverage establishments that meet these
conditions may also sell lower potency hemp products for on-site consumption.
Proposed regulations for on-sale of cannabis products
As directed by city council, staff recommend regulating the sale of cannabis edibles and
beverages for on-site consumption in the same manner as the city currently regulates the sale
of lower potency hemp edibles and beverages for on-site consumption. This would allow the
sale of cannabis edibles and beverages for on-site consumption at food and beverage
establishments located more than 300 feet from a school.
Proposed regulations for off-sale of cannabis products (cannabis retailers)
City council previously discussed appropriate buffers for cannabis retailers from other uses
including schools, attractions within a public park and childcare facilities. Staff suggested city
council consider mirroring the existing regulations for liquor stores which requires this use to
locate at least 300 feet from a school. In discussion, some council members indicated a
preference for a larger buffer between schools and cannabis retailers. Given this direction, staff
recommend requiring cannabis retailers to locate at least 1,000 feet from schools. Staff also
recommend requiring cannabis retailers to be at least 1,000 feet from other cannabis retailers
and 1,000 feet from pawnshops, currency exchanges, payday loan agencies, firearm sales and
sexually oriented businesses.
Type of
business
Permitted with
conditions
Separation requirements
Cannabis
retailer
C-2, MX-1, MX-2, PUD 2,
PUD 10, PUD 22, PUD 24
1,000 feet from schools
1,000 feet from a pawn shop, currency
exchange, payday loan agency, firearm sale or
sexually oriented business
1,000 feet from other cannabis retailers
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3) Page 4
Title: Cannabis zoning ordinance
Present considerations:
Proposed land use descriptions and conditions for cannabis businesses
Staff recommend grouping various cannabis businesses into two categories for zoning
purposes: cannabis retailer and cannabis operation.
Cannabis retailer means a retailer that sells packaged cannabis products to the general public
and medical patients. This land use description would apply to cannabis businesses with the
following licenses: cannabis retailer, cannabis microbusiness with a retail endorsement,
cannabis mezzobusiness with a retail endorsement and medical cannabis combination business.
This term excludes cannabis operation.
In previous conversations, city council supported the staff recommendation to align regulations
for cannabis retailers closely with those the city has for liquor stores by allowing cannabis
retailers as a use permitted with conditions in the C-2 general commercial, MX-1 vertical mixed
use, and MX-2 neighborhood mixed use districts. Staff also suggest allowing cannabis retailers
as a use permitted with conditions in existing planned unit developments (PUD) that permit
liquor stores. Additional conditions for cannabis retailers the city can consider include limiting
the hours of operation, prohibiting in-vehicle sales or service (e.g., drive throughs, curbside
pickup), prohibiting on-site consumption of lower potency hemp and cannabis edibles and
beverages, and requiring all uses to be completely contained within an enclosed building.
Cannabis operation means a facility where cannabis is grown, processed, or manufactured into
various products such as edibles, concentrates, wax, oils and tinctures. This land use description
would apply to cannabis businesses with the following licenses: cannabis microbusiness,
cannabis mezzobusiness, cannabis cultivator, cannabis manufacturer, cannabis wholesaler,
cannabis transporter, cannabis testing facility, cannabis event organizer and cannabis delivery
service. This term excludes cannabis retailer.
Staff recommend allowing cannabis operation as a use permitted with conditions in the I-G
general industrial district. Cannabis operation would be required to locate a minimum of 1,000
feet from schools and 1,000 feet from another cannabis producer. Staff also recommend
permitting cannabis retailers as an accessory use to cannabis operation within the I-G general
industrial district given they meet the same conditions required for cannabis retailers as a
principal use.
Type of business Permitted with
conditions
Separation requirements
Cannabis
operation I-G
1,000 feet from schools
1,000 feet from another cannabis operation
Staff acknowledge that cannabis operation may generate odors and noise. Staff find the
existing nuisance ordinances, general provisions and performance standards for industrial
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3) Page 5
Title: Cannabis zoning ordinance
districts, district and use specific provisions and architectural design standards in the city code
will help mitigate impacts and provide regulatory tools to address nuisances caused by any of
these activities. Existing provisions limit noise, odor, vibration, glare, heat and waste material;
limit hours of operation when abutting residential property; require noise-producing portions
of a development to locate away from adjacent residential areas; and prohibit interior and
exterior bars, grills, mesh or similar obstructions on doors and windows.
Proposed limit on cannabis retailers
Staff recommend limiting the number of cannabis retailers allowed to locate within the city to
one retailer per 12,500 residents. This limit will only apply to cannabis retailers; it will not apply
to lower potency hemp retailers. Staff find it in the city’s best interest to take a conservative
approach to establishing regulations for cannabis retailers given that we do not know how
many businesses may want to locate in the city. Limiting the number of cannabis retailers will
allow the city to track business interest, monitor administration of the new regulations and
adjust as needed.
Equity implications of cannabis retailer regulations
Staff acknowledge the potential equity implications of regulating cannabis retailers and have
taken steps to mitigate disproportionate negative impacts on residents and to promote
equitable access to these businesses.
Staff find the proposed buffer between cannabis retailers and schools will help reduce youth
access to cannabis products without prohibiting these businesses from locating in each
quadrant of the city. The proposed buffer between cannabis retailers will also mitigate
clustering of these businesses in one area of the city.
The State of Minnesota has also built equity considerations into the adult-use cannabis law that
further support equitable outcomes at the local level. The legislation establishes a social equity
application process to provide early opportunities for communities that experienced a
disproportionate, negative impact from cannabis prohibition and cannabis use. People who
qualify for social equity applicant status must submit information for verification and, when
verified by the OCM, can apply for license preapproval. The first round of social equity
verifications and preapprovals is in process. The OCM plans to offer additional social equity
verification and licensing opportunities in the future.
Next steps:
On Oct. 7, 2024, staff will present the proposed cannabis regulations to council and seek
direction on the policy questions raised in this report. Following this discussion, the planning
commission will hold a public hearing on a proposed zoning ordinance and make formal
recommendations to city council. The council must take final action on the proposed zoning
ordinance by Dec. 2, 2024, to ensure the regulations go into effect by Jan. 1, 2025, and prior to
the expiration of the city’s moratorium on cannabis-related businesses. The council will also
need to repeal related licensing regulations and adopt an ordinance relating to registration.
Special study session meeting of September 16, 2024 (Item No. 3) Page 6
Title: Cannabis zoning ordinance
Future actions Governing body Date
City council discussion of cannabis zoning
ordinance
City council Oct. 7, 2024
Public hearing for cannabis zoning ordinance Planning
commission
Nov. 6, 2024
First reading of cannabis zoning ordinance City council Nov. 18, 2024
(tentative)
Second reading of cannabis zoning ordinance City council Dec. 2, 2024
(tentative)
Cannabis zoning ordinance goes into effect Jan. 1, 2025