Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023/11/15 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - Planning Commission - Regular Planning commission meeting November 15, 2023 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther at 952.924.2574 or the administration department at 952.924.2505. Planning commission meeting The St. Louis Park planning commission is meeting in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Members of the public can attend the meeting in person or watch the meeting by webstream at bit.ly/watchslppc and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 14 and HD channel 859). Recordings of the meetings are available to watch on the city’s YouTube channel at www.youtube.com/@slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the end of the meeting or study session. Visit bit.ly/slppcagendas to view the agenda and reports. You can provide comment on agenda items in person at the meeting or by emailing your comments to info@stlouispark.org by noon the day of the meeting. Comments must be related to an item on the meeting agenda. Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION 1.Call to order – roll call 2.Approval of minutes •August 16, 2023 •September 20, 2023 •November 1, 2023 3.Hearing 3.a. 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East Applicant: GW Properties Case No: 23-17-S, 23-18-SP, 23-19-CUP 4.Other Business 5.Communications 6.Adjournment Future scheduled meeting/event dates: December 6, 2023 - planning commission regular meeting December 20, 2023 - planning commission regular meeting January 3, 2024 - planning commission regular meeting January 17, 2024 - planning commission regular meeting 1 2 Planning commission August 16, 2023 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha (arrived 6:02 p.m.), Matt Eckholm, Katie Merten, Tom Weber, Jan Youngquist Members absent: Michael Salzer Staff present: Laura Chamberlain, Jacquelyn Kramer, Melissa Kennedy, Sean Walther Guests: City residents 1.Call to order – roll call 2.Approval of minutes – July 5, 2023 It was moved by Commissioner Eckholm, seconded by Commissioner Beneke, to approve the minutes as presented. The motion passed 5-0. 3.Hearings 3a. Conditional use permit for St. Louis Park school district data center Applicant: Cunningham Group (on behalf of client: St. Louis Park Public Schools) Case No: 23-12-CUP Ms. Kramer presented the report. Commissioner Beneke asked if the new sidewalk is part of the CUP proposal in front of the commission today. Ms. Kramer stated yes and pointed it out to the commissioners. Commissioner Divecha asked where the entrance of the data center will be. Ms. Kramer pointed out the entrances and noted there is sidewalk all around the building, and she showed the pathway and exits. Commissioner Divecha asked what is south of the data center. Ms. Kramer stated that is an existing paved loading zone used to drop off equipment at the maintenance building and will also be used for equipment drop off at the data center. Commissioner Youngquist asked if there will be fencing between the adjacent playground and the maintenance center. Ms. Kramer stated yes, there will be fencing around the playground. Chair Weber asked about the two ADA parking spots being added and if those are on the public right of way. Ms. Kramer stated yes, that is correct. 3 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 16, 2023 Chair Weber opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chair Weber closed the public hearing. Commissioner Divecha noted the email that was received [from Chris Teigen, 6316 35th St. W. on August 12, 2023] and asked if there is anything that should be addressed. Chair Weber noted the email addressed construction times on the site and trash collection be completed later in the morning vs. earlier times. Ms. Kramer stated she has shared this email with the school district. Jim Langevin, facilities manager with the school district, noted the school district is in the process of having the trash receptacles moved back to their original location, which will help with noise heard by residents during collection. Commissioner Beneke asked if there are many service vehicles parked in the area currently. Mr. Langevin stated the site is used primarily for storage of extra gravel for the track field at the school inside a box truck. He added part of the renovation includes moving this truck and gravel inside the maintenance garage. It was moved by Commissioner Youngquist, seconded by Commissioner Divecha, to approve the conditional use permit for St. Louis Park school district data center as presented. The motion passed 6-0. 3b. Comprehensive plan amendment for 1639 Utah Dr and zoning map amendment for 1608 Utah Ave S Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No: 23-09-CP, 23-10-Z Ms. Chamberlain presented the report. Commissioner Divecha noted the city wants to sell this land at 1639 Utah Dr. to the owners of an adjacent lot and asked if they are ok with this plan. Mr. Walther stated the city has entered into a purchase agreement with the owners of the adjacent lot and the city council approved selling the property and directed staff to do this, but the sale of the property has not closed. Commissioner Divecha asked if the city owns 1608 Utah currently. Ms. Chamberlain stated yes. Commissioner Divecha asked what a passive park is. Ms. Chamberlain stated this is a level of park meaning there are not many facilities there and it is intended to be an open space and has a bench only. Commissioner Divecha asked if there is any plan to change that. Ms. Chamberlain stated no. 4 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 16, 2023 Commissioner Youngquist asked if the well has been capped at 1639 Utah Dr. Mr. Walther stated yes it has and noted the city only learned about this well recently and did not meet any current standards for wells. It was closed and sealed recently and a shed over it was also removed, adding this well did not serve any public purpose. Commissioner Youngquist asked when the city sells land, where do the proceeds go. Mr. Walther stated it varies, but typically first is used to making the whole for any expenses incurred. He noted in this case it is a very small property and the proceeds will cover the closing costs. Commissioner Beneke asked if there is any way to utilize the space at 1639 Utah Dr. at all as a park. Ms. Chamberlain stated no and there is no public access to this property, adding it is on the rear corner of the adjacent lot and very far from the street. Commissioner Merten asked how deep is the well and if there are any concerns someone could hit it in the future. Mr. Walther stated he does not have that information with him, but that the well was removed to a certain depth below the surround grade to avoid this, and the city is also required to file a disclosure with Hennepin County so all future owners are made aware of it. Chair Weber opened the public hearing. There were no public comments. Chair Weber closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Divecha, seconded by Commissioner Eckholm, to approve the comprehensive plan amendment for 1639 Utah Dr and zoning map amendment for 1608 Utah Ave S. as presented. The motion passed 6-0. 3c. Comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments for MnDOT conveyance near 2840 Toledo Ave S Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No: 23-13-CP, 23-14-Z Ms. Chamberlain presented the report. Commissioner Divecha asked with the status changing to a passive park, what does the city support now in terms of maintenance of the park. Ms. Chamberlain stated this property when it is sold to the city, it will be maintained. She added changing this to an active park is not anticipated by parks and recreation department plans at this time. She stated this could be considered during the next comprehensive park plan process. Commissioner Divecha asked if there was a safety hazard there, would this be the city’s responsibility to maintain that. Mr. Walther stated that the city will be responsible for the property as it is for other city owned land. 5 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 16, 2023 Commissioner Divecha asked if MnDOT or the city initiated this. Mr. Walther stated MnDOT approached the city as they deemed it to be deemed excess land. He added there are different processes for different land parcels. Commissioner Merten asked what is to the north of this parcel and if it is open space. Ms. Chamberlain stated that is property also owned by MnDOT and city is in talks with MnDOT about acquiring that property, however as that property is not being used as park space it is not part of this project. She added if there is developability to the area, that would come as a cost to the city, but noted the city is interested in it. She stated any development to that property would require another amendment to the comp plan. Mr. Walther made a correction stating the city has already purchased the property to the north, but the purpose of that purchase has not been determined yet and this will be explored through a separate process with the neighborhood and community at a later date. Chair Weber asked if this is the location where signs have been set up to save Rock Island. Mr. Walther stated there is an active group looking to preserve that area. He added the city did salvage historic “beehive” barbeques from the old Hwy. 100 area, and this came forward when MnDOT was selling the area and the city may be able to acquire it. Chair Weber opened the public hearing. Pat Bruhn, 3340 Xenwood, stated she does not know a great deal about this parcel but asked if there is anything left there that is salvageable from the WPA structure. Mr. Walther stated there are some elements including a retaining wall and some landscape elements that remain but are not in good condition, and folks that are concerned consider those ruins from the former wayside rest. Ms. Cannon asked what will happen to this open space. Chair Weber stated it will be a passive park, but not active with no equipment or trails. Mr. Walther stated programing and maintenance will be determined by the city’s Park department, adding it will be maintained as it is today. Wendy Newpower, 2921 Toledo Ave. S., stated the area is a big open space, and a bike path in front of it. She noted folks want to preserve the ruins, and it was a rest area years ago, adding it’s beautiful. She stated its very nice space and should remain as it is. Chair Weber closed the public hearing. Commissioner Divecha appreciated the comments made. She stated just to confirm, zoning the property in this way does not make it allowable for residential. Ms. Chamberlain stated that is correct, adding it will be zoned further away from residential and the comp plan guidance will keep this area not developed. 6 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 16, 2023 It was moved by Commissioner Eckholm, seconded by Commissioner Beneke, to approve the comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments for MnDOT conveyance near 2840 Toledo Ave S. as presented. The motion passed 6-0. 3d. Comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments for 3301 Webster Ave S Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Case No: 23-15-CP, 23-16-Z Ms. Chamberlain presented the report. Commissioner Merten asked if there is a level up from Park and Open Space, and if changing it change the maintenance level of the park. Ms. Chamberlain stated the use of park space is allowed in all of the city’s zoning districts. She stated there are areas that could have R1 or C1 zoning and in this case the city is updating city owned public parks so they continue in this use and would be eligible for single-family development or commercial use. Mr. Walther added the Park and Open Space designation does not indicate the type of park it is, as well as the zoning does not indicate the type of park either. Chair Weber stated the zoning is R2, and asked if it was a right of way, why was it an R2. Ms. Chamberlain stated the zoning goes to the center line of the right of way and she presented this on the map. Commissioner Youngquist asked why the northern boundary has a jog in it. Ms. Chamberlain stated the determination was made by MnDOT, and this is the boundary they identified as well as the legal description of the legal boundary. Mr. Walther added they are also avoiding some stormwater ponds. Chair Weber opened the public hearing. John Bruhn, 2240 Xenwood Ave., noted this space gets used quite heavily and it the only open space in the area. He stated currently the open space to the east is an open field which was abandoned by MnDOT and then planted with tall grass. He noted the area is used to walk dogs and the paths have doggie bag collection stands, and it is very heavily used. He stated the birds – warblers and native sparrows – migrate through there also, adding it’s a great wildlife area. He also noted there is a basin that catches storm water also. He stated he and his neighbors really want to see this retained as open space and added he appreciates any efforts on the part of the commission to do this. Chair Weber closed the public hearing. It was moved by Commissioner Beneke, seconded by Commissioner Eckholm, to approve the comprehensive plan and zoning map amendments for 3301 Webster Ave. S. as presented. The motion passed 6-0. 7 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug. 16, 2023 4.Other Business - none 5.Communications Mr. Walther stated the September 6 meeting will be cancelled. Staff anticipate a study session on the September 20 meeting regarding the housing types zoning code update. 6.Adjournment – 7:00 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Tom Weber, chair member 8 Planning commission August 16, 2023 7:05 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Study session Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, Katie Merten, Tom Weber, Jan Youngquist Members absent: Michael Salzer Staff present: Laura Chamberlain, Jacquelyn Kramer, Melissa Kennedy, Michael Sund, Sean Walther 1.Focus group on board and commission program purpose Ms. Kennedy and Mr. Sund presented the report. They noted input collected from the commission will be sent back to the city council for discussion of program purpose. Responses to questions: 1.Explain your experience on the planning commission. •Commissioner Divecha stated she is learning much and excited about having input in the city development. She added it feels like it was an intellectual exercise. •Commissioner Youngquist stated she likes hearing about development projects through the commission. •Commissioner Eckholm stated opportunity to weigh in on development and direction of the city and playing a role in helping SLP manage the housing crisis. •Commissioner Beneke stated affordable housing, development, serving all residents in these areas. •Commissioner Merten stated seeing residents’ engagement on issues and lack of engagement are interesting. •Chair Weber stated it matters that this commission is a heftier one by law, gratifying in knowing we are part of the purpose and the process. He added it feels the council appreciates what we do, so the commission matters, and he feels fulfilled in the role. 9 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug 16, 2023 Page 2 2. How do you see your work aligning with the city’s strategic priorities: • Commissioner Eckholm stated this board interacts with all the strategic priorities directly. • Commissioner Divecha stated neighborhood development is the major one. She added in many cases it feels like the work is asking if this complies with code and 90% of the decisions are not about items that are out of scope of the commission. Sometimes the scope of what the commission can do it limited, but discussing equity and transportation does go beyond and she appreciates staff bringing those items in. However, approvals are the majority of the work the commission does. • Commissioner Merten stated she agreed with this and added there is great impact with zoning discussions and having a diverse group is helpful in changing the old ways. • Commissioner Youngquist stated some of the priorities of the city have to do with the built environment and some with the social environment. She stated the work we do does focus on the built environment , it does affect people, so there is crossover. • Chair Weber stated the social capital is achieved here pretty well, adding in large part because Mr. Walther is our liaison and he appreciates the explanations staff provides, and noting this is what we can and cannot do. This helps build trust and social capital and this is important. He added Mr. Walther also does a good job of providing that culture. 3. What do you think about the overall program and how could it be used to connect with the community? • Commissioner Eckholm stated there might be a better way to connect feedback to meetings, and he noted the Edina program “Better Together Edina” which is a way to collect feedback virtually. • Chair Weber stated he likes the development coming signs but added using a QR code for more information on projects and also to make comments. This helps to get the word out and helps educate residents. • Commissioner Eckholm added the development signs could be more descriptive and help residents to engage more at the outset. • Chair Weber stated having one meeting in every neighborhood is helpful also, and on different times and day, especially for young people 10 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug 16, 2023 Page 3 • Commissioner Merten stated some don’t come to meetings unless they have something to complain about, but it’s nice when residents come to public hearings to compliment an area or project also. • Commissioner Eckholm stated he expected more engagement from the public when he came on the commission and was surprised to see it so low and only very rare. • Commissioner Beneke agreed and added some people get cynical about the process and think the city will just approve any development that come along because that’s what they do. 4. Do your neighbors and friends ask about items in the city and your work on the commission? • Chair Weber said yes, and then they also just ask about roads. He added this could be addressed with education. • Commissioner Eckholm stated he sometimes asks friends what is going on in their communities. He added the study sessions are really important for the public to attend also, to hear about planning and upcoming projects, but no one attends. • Commissioner Eckholm stated it’s great the city does this work, but there is a public perception that more needs to happen in public. But he added this can get too detailed also, and more education on what happens in Planning Commission and City Council would be helpful. He added people also need to come to the big meetings, not just the ones that affect them and their neighborhoods, in order to see how the process works. • Commissioner Youngquist stated the 2050 plan is abstract for some but when a project is proposed that’s across the street it’s easier to react. • Commissioner Merten stated staff can post notices, and post on social media and still there will be folks that say they haven’t heard about a project. • Commissioner Divecha stated you can never post enough communication, and pointed out there are those that just trust things are going well and don’t want to spend their time becoming involved in the process, unless they is an issue. She added being a governmental body, the city does owe the public all the information and communication, but in a methodical way. • Commissioner Eckholm stated the commission should not have to do all the communication that staff does, but it’s nice to have communication and education coming from the commissioners themselves, including postings on 11 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug 16, 2023 Page 4 social media. He added general education on how the planning commission works will help also. • Commissioner Divecha stated it’s hard for her to know what to comment on, not being on the city council. She stated she is not always certain what the role is of being on the commission. • Commissioner Merten agreed and added she has seen polls on Next Door and when it’s a thing that’s passed, she is always uncertain if she can make a comment. Commissioner Eckholm pointed out that as long as it’s in the past, it is ok to comment or engage on a topic on social media, as a commissioner. • Ms. Kennedy added the commissioners cannot conduct business outside of a meeting. Chair Weber added this should be added into the orientation meeting for commissioners, or a yearly refresher course would be helpful also. 5. How could the program be more inclusive to new members and reducing barriers to participate? • Commissioner Divecha stated Roberts Rules are a huge barrier. She feels hampered by this process and is not clear on when she can ask a question, or when you can comment. She stated she recognizes this as a tool, but it’s difficult as a new member. She added she is not sure what alternatives exist. She stated from an onboarding perspective this made it tough for her. • Commissioner Divecha stated having childcare for commissioners and a small stipend would be positive. • Commissioner Eckholm stated finding ways to allow virtual participation would be helpful especially for residents and made it easier for them to engage, so they didn’t have to attend a whole meeting and just join when their topic started. • Commissioner Merten stated time change for the meeting might be helpful also, possibly earlier. • Commissioner Eckholm stated in other communities also, evening is the most convenient meeting time for residents. 6. How could this program influence and build trust in the decision-making process of the city council? • Chair Weber stated clarification here is needed on which boards and commissions have power to make decisions. He added it might be better to not 12 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug 16, 2023 Page 5 have a commission if people assume that commission will have the power to do something if something negative happens. • Commissioner Divecha stated she wanted to join a commission but did not even know planning commission was a legally mandated commission with decision- making power. She thought it was only a discussion-type committee. She stated some folks might not know about this, so more clarity in descriptions would be helpful. • Commissioner Eckholm stated the city should not keep a commission that the city council does not listen to. He added if they are going to put the work in, then the recommendations should be taken seriously. The planning commission does have influence on the city council, but others may not. • Commissioner Beneke added each commission should also decide what they want to work on. • Chair Weber stated if a development is posed there should be robust information online and then meetings might be more well attended. • Commissioner Divecha stated she does not feel the commission’s role is liaising with the community, and that should be staff’s role. She added there is a desire from the community and those on commissions to communicate, but the infrastructure of the program makes this difficult. • Chair Weber pointed to the development web pages where comments can be left by the public, as a place for exchanging ideas and information. 7. Future of the boards and commissions program • Commissioner Eckholm stated open community forums might be helpful to engage residents more, and hosting engagement meetings in neighborhoods, and recommendations can be made on ongoing projects, or topics. He added possibly task forces can be created to encourage discussion and engagement and allow people to have their voices heard, as well as to capture data. Ms. Kennedy thanked the commission for their feedback and stated it aligns with much of what they are hearing. She added they will come back to the commission with more information and updates as this process progresses. She encouraged the commissioners to give any further feedback to Mr. Walther. 2. Adjournment – 8:25 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Tom Weber, chair member 13 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Aug 16, 2023 Page 6 14 Planning commission September 20, 2023 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Study session Members present: Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, Michael Salzer, Tom Weber Members absent: Jan Youngquist, Jim Beneke, Katie Merten Staff present: Gary Morrison, Sean Walther 1. Discussion of zoning code update Mr. Morrison presented the report including two draft options up for review and discussion. Commissioner Divecha asked about N2 vs. N3 zoning in the three district approach. Mr. Morrison stated that N2 is similar to the current R4 district and N3 is similar to the current RC district. Commissioner Salzer asked about N2 zoning criteria. Mr. Morrison noted in the in the three district approach, the N2 district allows 3-4 stories, while in the four district approach the N2 district allows up to 3 stories. Commissioner Divecha asked for clarification on areas of apartments, and commercial areas. Mr. Morrison noted on the map that the commercial, industrial, office, and PUD areas are left blank on the map as we are only discussing residential zoning districts. Commissioner Eckholm asked if the city anticipates any vacated right-of-way resulting from the split of Minnetonka Blvd and Hwy. 7 that could be developed. Mr. Walther stated no, that had been reviewed in early stages of the project. With the possible exception land around the Starbucks site where there might be opportunities in the future to vacate right of way, most of the land will be retained as right of way for the foreseeable future. Commissioner Eckholm noted development at Walker Lake and stated the city will not try to build another West End there. He added perhaps the Walker Lake area could allow 2-plexes. Mr. Walther stated historically that is what is already allowed there. Commissioner Weber asked if anyone has expressed interest in the area of the Bremer Building near Knollwood Target. Mr. Walther stated there is interest, but the area has some soil and a flooding issues that would need to be handled thoughtfully. Commissioner Weber asked about the areas around public schools, and if smaller residential development would be allowed there. Morrison noted that the land uses around 15 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Sept. 20, 2023 the schools are well established. Some schools already have higher density developments adjacent to them, other schools are surrounded by single-family that may afford for house or low-rise scale housing types. Commissioner Divecha noted the discussion around the N1 district seems to be whether to allow three and/or four-unit housing types. Commissioner Weber added there are further choices in different areas of the city. Commissioner Eckholm also noted the amount of development that has been added since Minneapolis approved 4-unit development has been low. He added this seems more like a long-term vision, noting Minneapolis has seen most of its expansion on its major arteries. He added the smartest investments and the best chance for more affordable housing will not come in new construction 3-4 plex’s. He stated he is more willing to look at 2-3 level, 9-unit buildings, on corridors, where there is transit. Commissioner Divecha agreed, and added the housing changes along the corridors will evolve over a long period of time. Commissioner Eckholm noted in both options, most land will be in N1. He stated the two different versions are not contingent on 3 or 4 plex. He added there is more potential for change in housing types with the corridor approach. Commissioner Weber added these maps give good options for the future. He added our neighborhoods already have a mix of housing types, so these maps acknowledge that and would allow the mix of housing types to continue in other areas of the city. Commissioner Salzer stated the first option did not show as much change, but the four district-corridor approach better illustrated the expanded housing options along the corridors. All commissioners agreed. The commissioners discussed possibly having a joint meeting with the city council, however Mr. Morrison stated we were unable to get that scheduled with the council due to their full calendar. He stated however staff will present this to council at a study session meeting in the future. It will be a public meeting and as such, people can attend to listen to the discussion. People in the audience, however, may not be able to provide input to the discussion. Mr. Morrison stated he will inform the commission when the city council study session to discuss this issue is scheduled. He added there will be a public input process, prior to any public hearings. 2. Communications Mr. Walther stated the 2023 State of the Community will be held Wed, Oct. 11, 4:30 – 6 p.m. at 10 West End office building – 1601 Utica Ave S., St. Louis Park. 3. Adjournment – 7:15 p.m. 16 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Sept. 20, 2023 ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Tom Weber, chair member 17 18 Planning commission November 1, 2023 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Study Session Members present: Jim Beneke, Matt Eckholm, Katie Merten, Jan Youngquist, Tom Weber, Michael Salzer and Mia Divecha Members absent: none Staff present: Sean Walther and Gary Morrison 1. Discussion of expanding neighborhood housing options Mr. Morrison and Mr. Walther presented the report. They noted staff is seeking general direction from the planning commission regarding the proposed zoning of several areas of the city that will be presented and discussed at this evening’s meeting. Mr. Morrison reviewed the four residential district concept zoning map and indicated the main transportation corridors. Commissioner Beneke asked about heights allowed for the proposed low-rise housing type category. Mr. Morrison stated the maximum is three story buildings. Mr. Morrison then presented information about an area on the northeast quadrant of the Louisiana Ave and Cedar Lake Rd intersection. He indicated staff had considered C1, O, and N-2 for these parcels that are presently zoned RC but used as office or dental office. Commissioner Eckholm asked about the distinction between C1 and the mixed-use zoning district. Mr. Walther noted the heights that are allowed are very different stating C1 is less height with 3 stories and mixed-use zoning allows 4-6 stories and higher density. He also noted that C-1 allow mixed-use, but the mixed-use district requires mixed use in new buildings and sites. Commissioner Eckholm stated this is what he has issues with. He would rather see higher density than see another auto-oriented one-story use. Commissioner Weber added there are two strip malls here, but noted he does not feel like it’s a commercial area because they don’t play well with each other, adding it is such a busy corner. He added maybe the roundabout will change that and make the areas feel more connected one another and have safer street crossings at these intersections. 19 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Nov. 1, 2023 Commissioner Merten added in this area, she has not seen many people walking from their home in the neighborhood to any of the commercial buildings there. Mr. Walther stated the current zoning on the corners south of Cedar Lake Rd are mixed use and the north parcels on the north side were left as C1 in 2019. Commissioner Youngquist asked about the construction of the roundabout and if there will be any remnant land that can be assembled with these two parcels. Mr. Walther stated there will be some, however he does not know much. Commissioner Weber asked if the parcels that have commercial uses now retain what they have. Mr. Walther stated yes, and if their use ceases, they can’t go back to what they were. Commissioner Salzer stated another factor is the fire department across the street, and from a traffic standpoint, who would want to live across the street from a fire department. Commissioner Eckholm noted with traffic here, the commercial buildings with the parking lots are likely generating more traffic than an apartment building ever would. Commissioner Divecha asked if there is a sense from a small business perspective about zoning. Mr. Walther stated there are a lot of inquiries from people looking for lower rent commercial spaces and existing commercial buildings can best meet that need. The commercial spaces in new mixed-use developments are much more expensive to lease. The commission agreed upon mixed-use for this location. Commissioner. Mr. Morrison noted another area that is currently R3 along the south side of Cedar Lake Road between Blackstone Ave and Alabama Ave and asked the commission’s thoughts on this area. This area consists of four lots, each improved with a single-family home. Commissioner Weber asked if there is potential for legal non-conforming in this area. Mr. Walther stated yes that is a possibility depending on the commission direction. Commissioner Youngquist asked how the proposed zoning districts align with the current comp plan. Mr. Walther stated it matches but on the low end. He stated in the R3 it’s a maximum of 11 units per acre. The medium density land use designation allows up to 30 units per acre. An R4 district allows the higher end of the medium density category. So either R3 or R4 district are consistent with the land use designation. Commissioner Youngquist asked how does this line up with the districts being reviewed. Mr. Walther stated they would be closer to N1 or N2 districts with the present zoning and the proposed house-scale and low-rise scale housing type categories. Commissioner Weber asked if there is any desire with the wetland there to have a future vision with park land. Commissioner Merten asked if this land would support a larger structure, despite the wetland. Mr. Walther stated there is high land and fill in these 20 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Nov. 1, 2023 parcels, but N2 would handle the range of uses and the medium density guidance with single-family up to low-rise. Mr. Walther added staff has met with the owner of two of these properties and the owner does have development interest at some point. Commissioner Youngquist asked how much of the wetland property is developable. Mr. Walther stated it could be over an acre, but he is not sure. The commission suggested N2 for this area. Mr. Morrison noted property next to city hall in St. Louis Park and developments around this area. He stated it is a mix of single-family, duplexes, and small to medium apartment buildings. There are also schools in this area. He asked the commissioners what to do in this area noting the proposed zoning is N4, N3, and N2. Commissioner Divecha asked if currently this area is mostly single-family. Mr. Morrison stated yes, and most are on small lots. Commissioner Divecha asked if it’s zoned N3 then anyone wanting to build a single-unit there could not. Mr. Morrison stated with N3, it would make the existing single-unit houses non-conforming, and new single-unit houses would not be permitted. Commissioner Weber stated his sense that going into the future N2 makes sense to keep single-family in this area. Commissioner Eckholm added he is not bothered by N2 in this area either. Commissioner Youngquist noted this area is sandwiched between Hwy. 7 and Minnetonka Boulevard, which is a transit route, is within walking distance of the light rail station, adding it can handle more density. Commissioner Eckholm stated with N2 if the density is there and the market supports it, it can be built, with low-rise buildings. He added it could be rezoned also later as well. Commissioner Divecha stated she believes at some point in the future the single-unit houses will go away, and some people may be sad about that, but that is what the utilitarian goal is. She stated this is right next to the N4 district and N3 around it, it’s not unreasonable to move toward an N3 district to force more development. Commissioner Salzer suggested dividing the area into two separate designations with properties fronting Ottawa being the dividing line. Those along Ottawa Avenue and west could be N3 and those east of could be N2. The commission agreed upon N3 between and including properties adjacent to Ottawa to Natchez Ave. And N2 in the remaining area east of Natchez. 21 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Nov. 1, 2023 Mr. Morrison noted another zone south of Highway 7, between Alabama and Brunswick, and between 36th and 37th Streets. The subject property is an industrial building that occupies the entire block. He noted the park and the Union Park Flats development in the area. Commissioner Weber asked if developers are coming to the city to ask for industrial uses. Mr. Walther stated most of our existing industrial buildings don’t have the floor to ceiling heights desired for contemporary warehousing in most industries, so there have been different commercial uses that have wanted to locate in these buildings. Also, the city for 30 or more years has seen a continuous reduction of land used for industrial and these areas have been targeted for redevelopment because they are less expensive, larger lots, and have less public resistance to change. He noted this area is guided for medium density residential in the comprehensive plan, and it is expected to turn over to residential at some point. He noted this current building is used by Nordic Ware as extra warehouse and distribution space. Commissioner Weber stated he thinks this area should be N3. Commissioner Eckholm agreed this area should be either N3 or N4. Commissioner Divecha agreed on N3 or N4. Mr. Walther stated the neighborhood has concerns on heights of buildings in this area and also preserving the historic park and character of the area. We saw strong interest in three stories or less when the Union Park Flats development went through the process in 2020. Commissioner Beneke asked what N4 allows for stories. Mr. Walther stated N4 allows for 7 or more stories. Commissioner Youngquist stated this area feels like N3 to her. She added if it is zoned for N4 and there is an appraisal, the value of the land will go up high, and then there will be a need for the buyer and developer to build more density to justify what was paid for the land. Commissioner Youngquist asked about the land adjacent to the east being zoned N3. Mr. Walther stated N3 matches the existing housing type on that parcel, which is a senior condominium building. The commission suggested proposing N4 noting the proximity to light-rail and highway 7, and that the Union Park Flats building provide a height transition from the house-scale to the subject property. They also commented that development on the subject parcel does not negatively impact the park and may bring more people to the park. Staff noted the change may require a comprehensive plan amendment. Mr. Morrison noted another area north of the Rec Center at 36th Street and Monterey Avenue, which is owned by the EDA and is guided for high density residential. Mr. Walther added this area has been expected to be held for community use and the EDA owns it. 22 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Nov. 1, 2023 Commissioner Weber noted this area is very high density residential already. He added there is a high flood plain area there and marsh land so it may limit development options. Mr. Walther added there are also major underground utility corridors in this area as well. The commission proposed N4. Mr. Morrison presented an area south of Excelsior Boulevard, near the Ukrainian Church and Susan Lindgren School. Mr. Walther stated this area was brought to discussion as there have been inquiries and the property is listed for sale. Commissioner Salzer noted the proximity to the frontage road and the sound barrier. Commissioner Weber asked if the sound barrier wall is an issue, especially if a building were to be higher than that. Mr. Walther stated staff recognized what has been happening with church properties being redeveloped and suggested this area be N2 also, similar consistent with the Brookside school conversion that happened on the other side of Highway 100. The commission agreed upon N2. Mr. Morrison noted an area just east of Knollwood Mall with senior living properties and commercial, plus a place of worship. He noted it is all zoned RC residential, and asked if it should be changed. Commissioner Eckholm stated he is fine with this area rezoned at N2. The commissioners agreed this area should be N2. Commissioner Youngquist asked if the land use plan would be changed with the next comp plan to reflect this change. Mr. Walther stated it would likely need to amended sooner and before the suggested zoning map amendments could be adopted. Mr. Morrison noted the area of the northeast corner of Highway 169 and Minnetonka Boulevard. The commission proposed N3. Mr. Morrison noted the area south of Wayzata Boulevard, fronting on Pennsylvania and the north side of 14th Street, all west of Louisiana Avenue where there is transit parking and office uses with single family homes and one two-story apartment building. He noted there are deep lots. The commission agreed that properties adjacent to Pennsylvania should be N3. The rest of the properties east of there to Louisiana should be N2. Mr. Walther stated staff will now review the overall 4 neighborhood districts, housing type groups, and the corridors approach for the zoning map with the city council and there is a planned second round of community engagement. 23 Unofficial minutes Planning commission Nov. 1, 2023 Mr. Walther asked if there were any general communications or announcements from commissioners. Commissioner Salzer noted he is moving out of St. Louis Park, and this will be his last planning commission meeting. The commissioners and staff thanked Commissioner Salzer for his service to the commission and wished him well. The commissioners congratulated Mr. Walther on receiving the 2023 planner of the year award from the MN Chapter of the American Planning Association. Mr. Walther noted the upcoming planning commission meeting dates: • November 15, 2023 - planning commission regular meeting • December 6, 2023 – planning commission regular meeting • December 20, 2023 – planning commission regular meeting • January 3, 2024 – planning commission regular meeting 2. Adjournment – 7:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Tom Weber, chair member 24 Planning commission: Study session Meeting date: November 15, 2023 Agenda item: 3a 3a 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East Location: Southeast corner of 5775 Wayzata Boulevard Case Numbers: 23-17-S, 23-18-SP, 23-19-CUP Applicant/Owner: GW Properties Review Deadline: 60 days: November 13, 2023 120 days: January 12, 2024 Recommended motions: Chair to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Recommend approval of the preliminary plat, special permit amendment, and conditional use permit to construct two buildings at 5775 Wayzata Boulevard, subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Summary of request: GW Properties has submitted planning applications in order to construct two new building in the southeast corner of the parking lot at 5775 Wayzata Boulevard. Site information: Site area (acres): 11.43 Current use: Surrounding land uses: Office, seasonal garden market North: restaurant, Interstate 394 East: hotel, restaurant, conference center 5775 Wayzata Blvd. Project site Interstate 394 16th Street W 25 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East South: wholesale and retail shopping centers West: hotel, multi-family housing Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning OFC- office O office Background: In 1978, city council approved a special permit (Resolution No. 6173) to allow construction of a nine-story office building and drive-in banking facility. Since then, the original special permit has been amended several times to allow additional uses and building expansions on the site. An administrative lot split created a separate parcel that now contains a restaurant; that parcel is not included in these planning applications. The site currently contains a nine-story office building and two surface parking lots. A seasonal garden center operates in the southeast corner of the parking lot. The eastern portion of the site contains a pond and trail. Present considerations: GW Properties proposes two new one-story buildings in the southeast corner of the existing parking lot. The property owners are working with the garden center to relocate the seasonal market to another location on the site. No changes are proposed to the existing office building nor the pond on the eastern portion of the site. If approved, construction is planned to begin in spring 2024 and the restaurants are tentatively scheduled to be open fall 2024. The applicant submitted the following applications: 1. A preliminary plat subdividing the lot into two new lots. 2. A special permit amendment to amend and restate the previous approvals on the site and allow the new restaurant uses. 3. A conditional use permit to allow: a. In-vehicle service; and b. Two principal buildings on one parcel. Traffic Demand Management: This site is located in Zone A of the I-394 Travel Demand Management (TDM) overlay zoning district. The developer will pay a TDM fee as part of the approval process. Preliminary plat analysis: The applicant seeks preliminary plat approval for the creation of an outlot from the existing parcel at 5775 Wayzata Blvd. The applicant will apply for final plat approval at a later date. Lots: The subdivision proposal creates two new lots from the existing 497,753 square foot lot. Lot 1 would be 431,701 square feet and contain the existing office building and pond. Lot 2 would be 45,168 square feet and contain two new one-story buildings along with new parking spaces, landscaping and a relocated access point to 16th street. Easements: The existing parcel contains sidewalk, drainage and utility easements along the 26 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East right-of-way. Both of the proposed lots will maintain these easements with a width of at least ten feet. Section 26-154 of the city code requires five-foot easements along all interior lot lines. New five-foot easements will be added to Lots 1 and 2. Right of way: The plat proposes dedication of 28,495 square feet of right of way to Zarthan Avenue and 16th Street. Sidewalks: City code requires all new plats to include sidewalks along all street frontages. 16th Street has existing sidewalk that meets this requirement. There is currently no sidewalk along the east side of Zarthan Avenue adjacent to the proposed plat; in lieu of constructing new sidewalk, the applicant will pay the city’s sidewalk fee of $13 per square foot to the city. Staff finds the preliminary plat meets city requirements. If city council approves the preliminary plat, the applicant will then come back to city council with a final plat application. Zoning analysis: Once the project is complete, Lot 1 containing the existing office building will meet all zoning requirements. The following table provides zoning information for the new lot and buildings. Further project details are provided below. Factor Required Proposed – Lot 2 Met ? Use Office, service, retail and restaurants as accessory uses in a larger office development. Restaurant: 11,400 SF yes Density n/a – no residential units Height 20 stories and 240 feet allowed. 1 story, 20 feet yes Building Materials- % of Class Type (1,2,3) 60% 30% 10% All elevations will have at least 60% class 1 materials yes Off-Street Parking 861 with no reductions (office & restaurants); eligible for 10% parking reduction for transit: 775; and 15% shared parking reductions: 659 663 Yes Bicycle parking spaces 14 14 yes EVSE Parking At least one level 2 charger, 50% of new spaces must have conduit Two spaces served by level 2 charging + conduit yes 27 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East Setbacks – Front / Rear 20 feet 15 feet 41.5 feet 63.4 feet yes Setbacks – West Side / East. Side 15 feet Half the building height: 10 feet 64.4 feet 10 feet yes Floor Area Ratio Maximum 1.5 Under 1.0 yes D.O.R.A. 12% of 45,168 square foot lot: 5,420 13%: 5,602 square feet yes Landscaping- # of Trees, Shrubs Trees: =17 Shrubs: = 102 Trees: 13 canopy + 9 ornamental = 18.5 Shrubs: 138 yes Uses: The existing office use is permitted in the O office zoning district without conditions. The applicant proposes four new tenant spaces in the two buildings that will contain fast-casual restaurants. Outdoor seating will be located north of and in between the two new buildings. The proposed restaurant uses are permitted with the following conditions: 1. This use shall be permitted as part of a larger development which contains at least one other principal use. This condition is met. The site contains existing office use. 2. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the comprehensive plan as a collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets. This condition is met. 3. All refuse shall meet the requirements of chapter 22 regulating refuse. This condition is met. 4. Buildings shall be located a minimum of 25 feet from any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to a school, religious institution or community center. This condition is met. The proposed outdoor seating of food and beverages is permitted as an accessory use with the following conditions: 1. The use is separated from any adjacent residential use by a building wall or six-foot fence. This provision will not apply if the residential use is located on an upper story above the principal use. Not applicable; no adjacent residential use. 2. The use is located within 500 feet of a residential use, and no speakers or other electronic devices which emit sound are permitted. This condition is met. 3. The use is located within 500 feet of a residential use, and the hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. This condition is met. None of the proposed restaurant tenants operate late at night. Staff also considered potential future uses that could come to the site at a later date. Service uses are permitted by right in the O office district. Retail uses are permitted with the following conditions: 28 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East 1. a. No single-use retail establishment over 20,000 square feet is permitted. The retail facility shall be permitted only as a part of a larger development on a single parcel which contains at least one other permitted principal use. 2. These uses shall not result in any exterior building modifications, including truck docks or freestanding signage, overnight truck parking or similar features. 3. Retail uses shall be integrated with other principal land uses which are within the O district and shall not exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the parcel. Staff find the project satisfies all required conditions of the proposed uses. Site design: The proposed site plan contains two buildings which each contain two tenant spaces intended for fast-casual type restaurants. The tenant spaces range in size from 2300 to 3800 square feet. Both buildings are oriented north toward the parking lot, and there is outdoor seating serving all four tenant spaces on the sidewalk north of the buildings and in between the two buildings. The westernmost tenant space includes a drive-up window and drive aisle for customers to pick up online orders from their vehicle. Access: The site currently has access on all sides of the property on Zarthan Avenue, 16th Street, Wayzata Boulevard and through a connected parking lot on the adjacent private property. Restaurant traffic is anticipated to arrive primarily through a relocated access drive on 16th Street which will be near the existing curb cut. Customers using the pickup window in the westernmost restaurant will enter a separate drive- through lane from the north of Lot 2, travel south to the pickup window, and then loop back north and out into the larger parking lot. This layout is designed to minimize traffic conflicts between vehicles entering the site from 16th Street and vehicles leaving the pick-up window. City staff and the applicant are discussing options for enhanced pedestrian connections from the project site to the public sidewalk and walking trail around the pond. Staff recommend adding at least one north-south connection to the public sidewalk on 16th Street. Site plans will be updated with any changes before the project goes before city council. Building design: All building elevations use at least 60% class 1 materials, including glass, 5/8” fiber cement panels, brick and ceramic tile. Ground floor transparency: All ground floor street-facing facades of restaurants in the O office district must meet ground floor transparency requirements. These requirements include: 50% ground floor transparency on front facades; no more than 10% of total window and door area may be opaque; and visibility into space shall be maintained for a minimum of three feet. The ordinance grants some flexibility to meet these requirements through design alternatives that increase pedestrian vibrancy and street safety. These alternatives must be approved by planning commission and city council as part of the CUP process. The proposed plans have the restaurants’ back of house spaces facing 16th Street, so in order to meet the ground floor transparency requirements, the applicant has proposed installing public art on the south side of the buildings. The proposed building elevations include space for four murals which, when combined with the glazing, cover 50% of the southern facades. The artist 29 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East and final art piece(s) shall be selected through the city’s public art process. This typically includes a public art request for proposals; a selection committee made up of residents, city staff, and owner representatives; and varying degrees of community engagement in the process leading up to the final design. Vehicular parking: Without any reductions, the zoning ordinance requires 861 parking spaces for the existing office and proposed restaurant uses. The ordinance allows the minimum parking requirement to be reduced by up to 10% for any parcel located within one-quarter mile of regular bus transit service, as defined in the ordinance. Bus Route 645 with half-hour weekday service stops across the street from the site on 16th Street, so parking requirements for both the office and restaurant uses qualify for a 10% reduction. 678 parking spaces are provided in the proposed plans: 561 surface parking spaces in Lot 1, 18 surface parking spaces in Lot 2, and 99 spaces in a level of underground parking in the office building. 15 of the surface lot spaces are in the area to be dedicated to right of way and are not included in the available parking count. The applicant has submitted a draft shared parking and ingress/egress easement agreement in order to allow the southern parking lot of Lot 1 to be shared with restaurant users. 329 of the 561 surface parking spaces in Lot 1 would be available to restaurant users. Staff find the proposed shared parking agreements meets the following conditions required in the ordinance: 1. There must be adequate parking for both uses during shared hours of peak demand. 2. The minimum spaces required under a shared parking agreement shall be based on the number of spaces required for the use that requires the most parking. 3. A shared parking agreement shall be filed with the city. Given the proposed plans and the parking reductions available in the zoning ordinance, staff find the plans meet city parking requirements. Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE): A level-2 EV charger will serve two parking spaces at the site, including one ADA parking space. An additional 50% of the new parking spaces will be served by conduit for future EV charger installation. The plans meet the city’s EVSE requirements. Bicycle parking: Seven U-racks, providing 14 bicycle parking spaces, are proposed north of the restaurants adjacent to the outdoor dining area. The plans meet city bicycle parking requirements. Landscaping: The zoning ordinance requires one tree per 50 linear feet of site perimeter, and six shrubs per 50 linear feet of site perimeter. 17 trees and 102 shrubs are required on Lot 2, and 18 trees and 138 shrubs are proposed in the landscaping plan. New parking islands contain canopy trees and perennial plantings and the new drive-through aisle is screened by evergreen trees. The plans meet city landscaping requirements. City staff are working with the office building property management to replant trees on Lot 1 that have been removed in recent years and to repair the walking trail around the pond. 30 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East Designed outdoor recreation area (DORA): A minimum of 12% of any lot in the O office district must contain designed outdoor recreation area or DORA. The proposed plans include 13% of Lot 2 designated DORA including outdoor seating for all four tenant spaces. The plans meet DORA requirements. Solid waste: A trash enclosure is north of the buildings and will fully screen the dumpsters. The plans will comply with the city’s solid waste ordinance. Utilities: The proposed buildings will connect to existing city utilities. Existing city infrastructure has capacity to serve the proposed uses. Any mechanical equipment placed on the roof shall be screened from view as required by the zoning ordinance. Signs: No sign plan was submitted with the applications. Prior to installation of any new signs, the applicant shall submit the necessary sign permits and a sign plan that shows all existing and proposed signage on both Lots 1 and 2. Signs shall comply with all sign regulations in the O office zoning district, and no signs will be permitted in right-of-way. Special permit amendment: In 1978, city council approved a special permit on the site to allow construction of the original 9-story office building and a drive-in banking facility. Since then, the special permit has been amended several times. • 1979: added restaurants to allowed uses at 5875 Wayzata. • 1981: Added 1,800 square foot cafeteria to ground floor as an allowed use. • 1985: Added 1,866 square foot expansion to ground floor on east side. • 1987: Added 1492 square foot expansion to ground floor on east side. • 2003: Amendment to allow exterior modifications including landscaping improvements to restaurant at 5875 Wayzata; combined and cleaned up previous approvals. • 2004: Added driveway and allowed mobile medical use on site. • 2006: Administrative lot split that separated 5875 Wayzata from the rest of the site; allowed exterior modifications for restaurant. • 2006: Added 800 square foot expansion to ground floor and southeast corner. The proposed preliminary plat and restaurant buildings require an additional amendment to the special permit. The existing office use is allowed by right in the O office zoning district. The proposed restaurant use is allowed with conditions in this zoning district. The resolution approving this special permit amendment will also clean up previous approvals on the site. Conditional use permit: Section 36-71(c) of the zoning ordinance permits more than one principal building on a single lot with a conditional use permit (CUP). The project must meet the following general requirements of all CUPs: 1. Consistency with plans. It is consistent with and supportive of principles, goals, objectives, land use designations, redevelopment plans, neighborhood objectives, and implementation strategies of the comprehensive plan. This condition is met. 2. Nuisance. It is not detrimental to the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the community as a whole. It will not have undue adverse impacts on the use and enjoyment of properties, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, parking facilities on adjacent 31 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East streets, and values of properties in close proximity to the conditional use. This condition is met. 3. Compliance with code. It is consistent with the regulations, intent and purpose of City Code and the zoning district in which the conditional use is located. This condition is met. The existing and proposed uses are allowed in the O office zoning district. In-vehicle services are permitted in the district with a conditional use permit. 4. Consistency with service capacity. It will not have undue adverse impacts on governmental facilities, services or improvements which are either existing or proposed. Services will not be adversely impacted by the proposed restaurant development. 5. Site design. It is consistent with the design and other requirements of site and landscape plans prepared by or under the direction of a professional landscape architect or civil engineer registered in the state and adopted as part of the conditions imposed on the use by the city council. This condition is met. 6. Consistency with utilities. It is consistent with the City’s stormwater, sanitary sewer, and water plans. The proposed design is consistent with all city utility plans. In-vehicle service: The applicant proposes a drive-up pick-up window to serve the westernmost tenant space. This use falls under the in-vehicle service land use in the zoning ordinance. In the O office zoning district, in-vehicle service require a conditional use permit and must meet the following conditions: 1. Drive-through facilities and stacking areas shall not be located within 100 feet of any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential use, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community centers. This condition is met. 2. Stacking shall be provided for six cars per customer service point and shall comply with all yard requirements. This condition is met. 3. This use shall only be permitted when it can be demonstrated that the operation will not have a significant adverse effect on the existing level of service on adjacent streets and intersections. This condition is met. Staff do not anticipate a negative impact to the level of service of adjacent streets. The right-of-way dedication in the preliminary plat will allow for future road enhancements to improve level of service of streets in the area. 4. The drive-through facility shall be designed so it does not impede traffic or impair vehicular and pedestrian traffic movement or exacerbate the potential for pedestrian or vehicular conflicts. This condition will be met. The pick-up window drive aisle is designed to minimize crossings and conflicts between restaurant users and office users. City staff are working with the applicant on further revisions to add additional pedestrian crossing(s) across the drive aisle and enhanced pedestrian connections from the site to the public sidewalk and the walking trail to the east. Plans will be finalized before the project goes before city council. 5. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the comprehensive plan as a collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets. This condition is met. 6. Any canopy constructed as part of this use shall be compatible with the architectural design and materials of the principal structure. No canopy proposed. 7. The use is in conformance with the comprehensive plan including any provisions of the redevelopment chapter and the plan by neighborhood policies for the neighborhood in 32 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East which it is located, and conditions of approval may be added as a means of satisfying this requirement. This condition is met. The proposed restaurants are in conformance with the land use guidance in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Staff find the project meets all general CUP requirements as well as the specific requirements for in-vehicle service in the O office zoning district. Public outreach: The applicant held a virtual neighborhood meeting on October 26, 2023. Invitations were mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the project site. About three community members as well as Councilmember Brausen, city staff, and the development team attended. Questions were asked about the placement of the restaurants in a particular location of the site, traffic generated by the project, impacts to city utilities, and potential relocation of the garden center. People also asked if alcohol would be served by the restaurants, and the developer replied it was highly unlikely due to the tenants they are working with. City staff explained the process for obtaining a liquor license through the city, which is a separate application from the planning applications currently under consideration. Staff have received one email in support of the development. Please see the attached email. Next steps: Depending on planning commission’s recommendation, city council is tentatively scheduled to take action on the applications in December 2023. Recommendations Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved official exhibits and city code. 2. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 3. The applicant must submit a final plat application within one year after approval of the preliminary plat application or approval of the preliminary plat shall be considered void, unless a request for time extension is submitted in writing and approved by the city council. 4. Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: a. A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the city to ensure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the city. b. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the city and developer that addresses, at a minimum: i. The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. 33 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East ii. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. iii. Shared parking agreement exhibits and documents. iv. The applicant shall reimburse City Attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. v. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Planning Development Contract. 5. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: c. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. d. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. e. All necessary permits shall be obtained. f. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 125% of the cost for all public improvements (street, sidewalks, boulevards, utility, etc.) and landscaping. Staff recommend approval of the special permit amendment, subject to the following conditions: 1. Development plans will be updated to extend drawing boundaries of civil drawings to include existing infrastructure and for minor corrections to ensure consistency with all plans before the project goes before city council. 2. Subject to city council approval of the final plat, the recording of the approved final plat at Hennepin County, and city council approval of the conditional use permit. 3. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved official exhibits and city code. 4. Construction and staging information will be provided to staff for review and approval before building permits are issued. 5. All new utility service structures shall be buried. 6. Prior to installation of any new signage, the applicant shall submit the necessary sign permits and a site signage plan that shows all existing and proposed signage on both Lots 1 and 2. No signage will be permitted in right-of-way. 6. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. 34 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East b.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. c.All necessary permits shall be obtained. 7.Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a.Final construction plans for all public improvements and private stormwater system shall be signed by a registered engineer and approved by the city Engineer. b.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. c.Agreement for the developer to contribute fund toward public art and to cooperate with the City on a public process to select artist(s) and artwork for the site. 8.The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a.All city noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 7 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b.The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c.Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d.The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e.Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the city engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f.The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. g.Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 9.Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the official exhibits. 10.Upon city approval of and acceptance of the public and private site improvements, the developer shall provide a one-year warranty and cash escrow or letter of credit for 25% of the final construction costs of the improvements. 11.In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. Staff recommend approval of the conditional use permit subject to the following conditions: 35 Regular meeting meeting of November 15, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: 5775 Wayzata Boulevard – Park Place East 1.Subject to city council approval of the final plat, the recording of the approved final plat at Hennepin County, and city council approval of the special permit amendment. 2.In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 3.The conditional use permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the building or structure for which the conditional use permit is granted is removed. Supporting documents: resident email, development plans Prepared by: Jacquelyn Kramer, associate planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director 36 From:Nick Kieser To:Jacquelyn Kramer Subject:Park Place East Development - 5775 Wayzata Blvd East Date:Tuesday, November 7, 2023 1:37:14 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Afternoon, I am writing to comment on the Park Place East development application. I like the idea of activating this parking lot more by introducing these restaurant uses and keeping Untiedt's. This parking lot never seems to be highly utilized, especially now after COVID. I do see this application and potential development as an opportunity to improve the surface parking to advance the goals of SLP. I think the surface parking area can be reduced even more and more green/open space can be incorporated into this development. In the 2040 Comp Plan one of the goals for the Commercial and Office Land Use Goals notes: D. "Encourage infill development and aesthetic improvements to commercial surface parking lots in order to enhance adjacent public streets and sidewalks and more efficiently utilize commercial land." (pg. 5-138) With that in mind, this could be a great opportunity to participate in the Depave SLP to improve stormwater runoff and aethetics since the parking lot is underused as this application for additional development represents. Creating a more welcoming and natural space in a heavily paved area can improve this area and community feel significantly, especially in the areas closer to the street/sidewalk. There is also a sidewalk gap on the east side of Zarthan Ave S that could be filled in. Hopefully, the platting and CUP process can lead to additional improvements to this development application. Thanks for hearing my comments. Thanks, Nick Kieser 1645 Brunswick Ave S 37 38 39 EVPARKINGEVPARKINGSNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINES885882882883884885885881881881881 882882882 883884880881880880 885879881882883884880 881882883875872873874876877878879880879881882883885882883884881886886885885884884885884886883880879881875880880880880880880880880880880885885885885885885885872873874876877878878878879879879881881881881881881881881881882882882882882882882882882882883883883883883883883883883883883883883884884884884884884884884884 884884886886886886886886886886886887887887185.3' 30.0'239.6'15.0'230.5' 15.0'10.0'This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\P1-PRELIM PLAT.dwg November 07, 2023 - 2:58pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTHPREPARED FORPRELIMINARYPLATP1005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNPRELIMINARY PLAT ZONING INFORMATION1. PER ZONING MAP BY THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DATED, DECEMBER 14TH 2021, THESURVEYED PROPERTY IS ZONED OFFICE DISTRICT1.1. MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT: LESSER OF 20 STORIES OR 240 FT1.2. MAXIMUM BUILDING FLOOR AREA RATIO: 1.51.3. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: 100 FT1.4. MINIMUM LOT AREA: 15,000 FT1.5. MINIMUM FRONT YARD: GREATER OF 20 FT OR BUILDING HEIGHT, MAX. 100 FT1.6. MINIMUM SIDE YARD: 15 FT ONE SIDE, HALF THE BUILDING THE OTHER1.7. MINIMUM REAR YARD: 15 FT2. PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN TRAVEL DEMAND MANAGEMENT ZONE AAREA SUMMARYPROPOSED LOT 1: 431,701 SF / 9.91053 ACRESPROPOSED LOT 2: 45,168 SF / 1.0369 ACRESDEDICATED ZARTHAN AVENUE: 28,495 SF / 0.6541 ACRESTOTAL: 505,364 SF / 11.60153 ACRESPARKING SUMMARYTOTAL PARKING REQUIRED AT SITE PER CODE: 114 PARKING STALLSPARKING PROVIDED ON LOT 2: 18 PARKING STALLSPARKING PROVIDED ON LOT 1: 561 PARKING STALLS40 2300 SF3800 SF2500 SF3000 SFREG. ARCHITECTMARK T. DiGANCIDATE2211 N. Elston Ave. Suite 304, Chicago, Illinois 60614 Fax: 847.885.7751 Tel.: 847.885.8300D E S I G N S T U D I O 24, LLC.ARCHITECTS - DESIGNERS - PLANNERSPROPOSED ELEVATIONS5775 W. WAYZATA BLVD.ST LOUIS PARK, MN, 5541606.29.2023GW PROPERTIESA,SST11" = 50'-0"1SITE AERIAL - CLOSE UP0100'150'200'50'41 REG. ARCHITECTMARK T. DiGANCIDATE2211 N. Elston Ave. Suite 304, Chicago, Illinois 60614 Fax: 847.885.7751 Tel.: 847.885.8300D E S I G N S T U D I O 24, LLC.ARCHITECTS - DESIGNERS - PLANNERSPROPOSED ELEVATIONS5775 W. WAYZATA BLVD.ST LOUIS PARK, MN, 5541606.29.2023GW PROPERTIESA,SA2NORTH-WEST CORNERNORTH-EAST CORNER42 23' - 0"23' - 0"23' - 0"18311111111445999761111111111115GLASS 36%TILES 3%AWP NICHIHA 23%BRICK VENEER 22%STONE VENEER 16%GLASS 35%TILES 2%SIDING 9%BRICK VENEER 35%EIFS 19%131314TOTAL GLASS AND WINDOWS AREA 1,171 SFSPANDREL GLASS 117 SF (10%)23' - 0"979610121111GLASS 15%AWP NICHIHA 17%BRICK VENEER 36%EIFS 32%23' - 0"23' - 0"97999111313GLASS 8%TILES 2%SIDING 6%BRICK VENEER 84%23' - 0"23' - 0"5454511GLASS 7%BRICK VENEER 73%STONE VENEER 20%23' - 0"12731111GLASS 18%TILES 4%AWP NICHIHA 78%15' - 2"16' - 9"16' - 9"16' - 9"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"9' - 8"23' - 0"23' - 0"PUBLIC ART (MURALS)PUBLIC ART (MURALS)PUBLIC ART (MURALS)PUBLIC ART (MURALS)10' - 0"6' - 6"10' - 0"11' - 0"610799111154542GLASS 4%SIDING 10%BRICK VENEER 67%EIFS 19%GLASS 6%AWP NICHIHA 42%BRICK VENEER 35%STONE VENEER 17%REG. ARCHITECTMARK T. DiGANCIDATE2211 N. Elston Ave. Suite 304, Chicago, Illinois 60614 Fax: 847.885.7751 Tel.: 847.885.8300D E S I G N S T U D I O 24, LLC.ARCHITECTS - DESIGNERS - PLANNERSPROPOSED ELEVATIONS5775 W. WAYZATA BLVD.ST LOUIS PARK, MN, 5541606.29.2023GW PROPERTIESA,SA11/16" = 1'-0"1NORTH ELEVATION1/16" = 1'-0"3WEST ELEVATION - CHIPOTLE1/16" = 1'-0"4EAST ELEVATION - SWEETGREEN1/16" = 1'-0"5WEST ELEVATION - SNOOZE1/16" = 1'-0"6EAST ELEVATION - SHAKE SHACK1/16" = 1'-0"2SOUTH ELEVATIONWEST BUILDING (CHIPOTLE & SWEETGREEN) TOTAL SOUTH ELEVATION AREA: 720.14 SFGROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY AREA: 374.21 SF => 52%EAST BUILDING (SNOOZE & SHAKE SHACK)TOTAL SOUTH ELEVATION AREA: 868.96 SFGROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY AREA: 434.60 SF => 50%1 - AWP NICHIHA RIBBED IVORY (HORIZONTAL)2 - AWP NICHIHA RIBBED INDIGO (VERTICAL)3 - AWP NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD SPRUCE4 - BRICK VENEER CANYON MIST5 - STONE VENEER6 - EIFS SOFT GRAY7 - EIFS BAND WHITE8 - CERAMIC TILE BASE BLACK 9 - BRICK VENEER WHITE10 -BRICK VENEER SLATE11 -STOREFRONT GLASS12 -AWP NICHIHA VINTAGEWOOD BARK13 -CERAMIC TILES GREEN14 -WOOD SIDING GREEN43 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg November 06, 2023 - 11:18amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC0005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNNORTHVICINITYN.T.S.ST LOUIS PARK, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MN1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCHWHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A ANSI full bleed D(34.00 x 22.00 Inches) SHEET.3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/ORUTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDINGPOSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES.4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES,AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS.NOTES:PROJECT TEAM:SURVEYOREGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC.475 OLD HIGHWAY 8 NW, NEW BRIGHTON,MINNESOTA 55112TELEPHONE: (612) 466-3300CONTACT: ERIC A. ROESEREMAIL: EROESER@EFNSURVEY.COMENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTKIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.PREPARED BY: Brian P. Gammon767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100ST. PAUL, MN 55114TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197OWNER / DEVELOPERGW PROPERTIES2211 N. ELSTON AVE, SUITE 400,CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60614TELEPHONE: (773) 382-04455775 W. WAYZATA BLVD.FORSITE DEVELOPMENT PLANSARCHITECTDESIGN STUDIO 24, LLC2211 N. ELSTON AVE, SUITE 304,CHICAGO ILLINOIS 60614TELEPHONE: (847) 885-8300CONTACT: MARK T. DIGANCISheet List TableSheet NumberSheet TitleC000COVER SHEETA001ALTA SURVEYC100GENERAL NOTESC200SITE DEMOLITION PLANC300 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 1C301 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN - PHASE 2C302SWPPPC400SITE DIMENSION PLANC500GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLANC501STORM SEWER PLANC600UTILITY PLANC700CIVIL DETAILSC701CIVIL DETAILSC702CIVIL DETAILSC703CIVIL DETAILSL100LANDSCAPE PLANL101LANDSCAPE DETAILS--P1-PRELIM PLAT - C500C201TREE INVENTORY & PRESERVATION PLANL200IRRIGATION PLANA001ALTA SURVEYSITEW 16TH STI - 394WAYZATA BLVDPARK P L B L V D ZARTHAN AVE S44 AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINESBBBASTORM SEWER STRUCTUREASTORM SEWER PIPEASTORM SEWER STRUCTUREASTORM SEWER STRUCTUREASTORM SEWER PIPEATELECOM/FIBER OPTIC LINESATREEATREEATREEATREEATELECOM/FIBER OPTIC LINESATREEATREEATREEATREEATREEATREEATREEATREEATREEATREEACURB & GUTTERACURB & GUTTERACURB & GUTTERACURB & GUTTERASIDEWALKASIDEWALK880885885879881881882882882882883883884884880885879881882883884880879ALANDSCAPE AREAAPARKING STRIPINGCDDDEEEEEEThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg November 06, 2023 - 7:58amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORSITE DEMOLITIONPLANC2005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNNORTH1. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATIONAPPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES,FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THEIMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BEUNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILLMATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING OF THEDEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL AND STATE REGULATIONS. THECONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ANY REQUIRED PERMITS FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL FROM THEAPPROPRIATE LOCAL AND STATE AGENCIES. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT ANDRECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE, INCLUDING THETYPE OF DEBRIS AND LOCATION WHERE IT WAS DISPOSED.3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITYSERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ANDCOORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY.4. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVALAND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANYCONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCESAND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THECONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES.5. THE LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BESTINFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEERASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITIONACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES TO PROVIDE LOCATIONSOF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN PROPOSED WORK AREA.6. EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE BASED ON AVAILABLE RECORD PLAN DATAAND/OR FIELD UTILITY MARKINGS AND ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION.ADDITIONAL UNMARKED OBSTACLES MAY EXIST ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS ANDPROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED UNDERGROUND FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TOAFFECTED UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING REMOVAL OF SERVICE LINES AND CAP ANY ABANDONEDLINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE PROPOSED WORK.7. ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVEDOR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIMESHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY ISNECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSEATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION.8. CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES,ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THECONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED INACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY, COUNTY, AND STATE DOT AS NECESSARY.9. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, ANDSHALL NOTIFY ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANYTIME DURING CONSTRUCTION.10. PRIOR TO THE START OF DEMOLITION, INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BMP'S IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEEROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLANS / SWPPP.11. CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT ISREQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OFTHE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT OR CURB, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVALAND REPAIR.12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE CITY WATER AND FIREDEPARTMENTS TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE ANDSURROUNDING PROPERTIES THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BERESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY.ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THECONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED.13. IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNERIMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTATE REQUIREMENTS.14. IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALLCONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BEDISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS.15. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE;ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL NOT BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER.16. IF CONTAMINATED MATERIAL IS ENCOUNTERED ON THE PROJECT SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL STOPWORK AND NOTIFY THE OWNER AND ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY.17. TREE PROTECTION MUST BE INSTALLED BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES OCCUR.DEMOLITION PLAN NOTESKEYNOTE LEGENDPROTECT IN PLACEREMOVE EXISTING TEMPORARY FENCEREMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLESAWCUT LINE, OFFSET FOR CLARITYREMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT MARKINGSABCDELIMITS OF CONSTRUCTIONREMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACEREMOVE CONCRETE SURFACEREMOVE BUILDINGREMOVE TREEREMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTERREMOVE UTILITY LINESPROPERTY LINEEXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINEEXISTING CHAINLINK FENCEEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATERMAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONEEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLEEXISTING CONTOUREXISTING SIGNEXISTING FLARED END SECTIONEXISTING STORM MANHOLEEXISTING STORM CATCHBASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING POWER POLEEXISTING LIGHT POLEEXISTING TREECLEARING & GRUBBINGEXISTING TREE LINEEXISTING CURB & GUTTERLEGENDFULL DEPTH SAWCUT45 AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINESBADDADDCPROTECT CANDLESTICK POND AT ALL TIMESThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-EROS PH1 PLAN.dwg November 06, 2023 - 7:58amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH1. INSTALL PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL (I.E. SILT FENCE) AND INLET PROTECTION ATEXISTING STORMWATER INLETS.2. CONSTRUCT STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND CONCRETE WASHOUT3. PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA.4. CONSTRUCT AND STABILIZE DIVERSIONS AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS.5. CLEAR AND GRUB THE SITE.6. BEGIN MASS SITE GRADING AND ROUGH GRADE SITE SUFFICIENTLY TO ESTABLISHPROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERNS.7. START CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING PAD AND STRUCTURES.8. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DISTURBED AREAS THAT WILL BEINACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE OR AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES AND/OR CITYGRADING PERMIT(S).NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTSOF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTIONPURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING ANDCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/ORDURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCEIS NECESSARY.PHASE 1 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONROCK ENTRANCEINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCESAFETY FENCEBIOROLLLEGENDEROSION CONTROL BLANKETPREPARED FOREROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN -PHASE 1C3005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMN1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THEEROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTSINCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALLSUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIESSHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATIONSYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS.3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL,STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENTADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER.4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILLPREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENTSPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THECONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING ISREQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, ITSHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO ANAPPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO APUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR.5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF SOIL STABILIZATION SHALL BEINITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUMEXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGEAREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANINGAREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICETRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES.8. ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLECLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATEDBEFORE DISPOSAL.9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BEMAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL ORCHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS.10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OFMOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSIONOPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED.11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITEDINTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THEPREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGEDITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE.12. STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGEWAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDESTABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OROTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION.13. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROLBMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROLMEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATERPOLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESSCONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS,LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS.14. EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THESTART OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON ASPRACTICABLE.15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITHAPPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION.16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROLBMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THECONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THEAPPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THEJOB SITE TRAILER.17. NO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OR WASHING ALLOWED ON SITE.18. NO CONCRETE WASHOUTS ON SITE, ALL WASHOUTS SHALL REMAIN ON DELIVERY TRUCKS.EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTESTHE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITEBINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGESTO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM,UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THESEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THELOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY,WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS,AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF.SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTSAREA SUMMARYTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1.02 AC / 44,277 SFEXISTING PERVIOUS AREA0.11 AC / 4,838 SFEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA0.91 AC / 39,439 SFPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA0.26 AC / 11,207 SFPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA0.76 AC / 33,070 SFAREA LOCATED OUTSIDE PROPERTY LINE0.40 AC / 17,428 SFTOTAL DISTURBED AREA1.42 AC / 61,705 SFPHASE 1 BMP QUANTITIESSILT FENCE±130 LFINLET PROTECTION1 EAROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE1 EABIO ROLL340 LFKEYNOTE LEGENDSILT FENCEINLET PROTECTIONROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEBIO ROLL, OFFSET 3.0' FOR CLARITYABCD46 DO NOT ENTEREVPARKINGEVPARKINGSNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINESBADAEBBBPROTECT CANDLESTICK POND AT ALL TIMESPROTECT UNDERGROUND TREATMENT SYSTEM EXCAVATION AND ONCE INSTALLEDNORTHPREPARED FOREROSION ANDSEDIMENTCONTROL PLAN -PHASE 2C3015775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMN1. TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BEINACTIVE FOR 14 DAYS OR MORE.2. CONSTRUCT UNDERGROUND SITE UTILITIES AND STORM SEWER, INCLUDINGUNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.3. INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION AT ANY NEW STORM SEWER STRUCTURESAS EACH STRUCTURE IS CONSTRUCTED.4. COMPLETE SITE GRADING AND PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED ASTHEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE.5. PLACE PAVEMENT BASE MATERIAL AND INSTALL SUBDRAINAGE SYSTEM.6. CONSTRUCT PAVEMENTS, CURB & GUTTER, AND SIDEWALKS.7. AS APPROPRIATE, REPLACE & MAINTAIN INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WITHIN PAVEDAREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES.8. COMPLETE FINAL GRADING AND INSTALL OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION (SEEDING,SODDING, ETC.) WITHIN LANDSCAPED AREAS.9. WHEN THE SITE HAS ACHIEVED FINAL STABILIZATION AS DEFINED BY THE APPLICABLEEROSION CONTROL PERMITS, REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION &SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND RE-STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.NOTE: THE SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION IS INTENDED TO CONVEY THE GENERAL CONCEPTSOF THE EROSION CONTROL DESIGN AND SHOULD NOT BE RELIED UPON FOR CONSTRUCTIONPURPOSES. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR DETAILED PHASING ANDCONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IN WRITING IMMEDIATELY, PRIOR TO AND/ORDURING CONSTRUCTION IF ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCEIS NECESSARY.PHASE 2 SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTIONROCK ENTRANCEINLET PROTECTIONSILT FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCESAFETY FENCEBIOROLLLEGENDEROSION CONTROL BLANKET1. THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ("SWPPP") IS COMPRISED OF THEEROSION CONTROL PLAN, THE STANDARD DETAILS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTSINCLUDED IN THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SWPPP, PLUS THE PERMIT AND ALLSUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.2. ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIESSHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE SWPPP AND NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATIONSYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT, AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS.3. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL,STATE AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS, AS APPLICABLE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENTADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY THE PERMITTING AGENCY, ENGINEER OR OWNER.4. SITE ENTRY AND EXIT LOCATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION THAT WILLPREVENT THE TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PUBLIC ROADWAYS. SEDIMENTSPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY FROM THECONSTRUCTION SITE MUST BE REMOVED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. WHEN WASHING ISREQUIRED TO REMOVE SEDIMENT PRIOR TO ENTRANCE ONTO A PUBLIC ROADWAY, ITSHALL BE DONE IN AN AREA STABILIZED WITH CRUSHED STONE WHICH DRAINS INTO ANAPPROVED SEDIMENT BASIN. ANY FINES IMPOSED FOR DISCHARGING SEDIMENT ONTO APUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY SHALL BE PAID BY THE CONTRACTOR.5. TEMPORARY SEEDING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS OF STABILIZATION SHALL BEINITIATED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF THE LAST DISTURBANCE ON ANY AREA OF THE SITE.6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE LAND DISTURBANCE AND CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUMEXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT.7. CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON THE PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGEAREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANINGAREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICETRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES.8. ALL WASH WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLECLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATEDBEFORE DISPOSAL.9. SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BEMAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL ORCHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS.10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DUST CONTROL ON SITE. THE USE OFMOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSIONOPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED.11. RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITEDINTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THEPREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORM WATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGEDITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE.12. STAGING AREAS, STOCKPILES, SPOILS, ETC. SHALL BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF DRAINAGEWAYS SUCH THAT STORM WATER RUNOFF WILL NOT BE ADVERSELY AFFECTED. PROVIDESTABILIZATION MEASURES SUCH AS PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL BMP'S, SEEDING, OROTHER COVERING AS NECESSARY TO PREVENT EROSION.13. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR RE-ESTABLISHING ANY EROSION CONTROLBMP DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS. NOTIFY THE OWNER'SREPRESENTATIVE OF ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE ESTABLISHED EROSION CONTROLMEASURES THAT MAY LEAD TO UNAUTHORIZED DISCHARGE OF STORM WATERPOLLUTANTS. UNAUTHORIZED POLLUTANTS INCLUDE (BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO) EXCESSCONCRETE DUMPING, CONCRETE RESIDUE, PAINTS, SOLVENTS, GREASES, FUELS,LUBRICANT OILS, PESTICIDES, AND SOLID WASTE MATERIALS.14. EROSION CONTROL BMP'S SHOWN ON THESE PLANS SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THESTART OF LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES ON THE PROJECT, AND INITIATED AS SOON ASPRACTICABLE.15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE AUTHORITIES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND SHALL MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE WITHAPPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION.16. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST AND/OR PROVIDE ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROLBMP'S AS NEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND OFF-SITE SEDIMENT DISCHARGE FROM THECONSTRUCTION SITE. LOG AND RECORD ANY ADJUSTMENTS AND DEVIATIONS FROM THEAPPROVED EROSION CONTROL PLANS WITHIN THE SWPPP DOCUMENTS STORED IN THEJOB SITE TRAILER.17. NO EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OR WASHING ALLOWED ON SITE.18. NO CONCRETE WASHOUTS ON SITE, ALL WASHOUTS SHALL REMAIN ON DELIVERY TRUCKS.EROSION CONTROL PLAN NOTESTHE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP BY NOTING ON THE SITE MAPS IN THE JOB SITEBINDER TO REFLECT THE PROGRESS OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND GENERAL CHANGESTO THE PROJECT SITE FOR THE DURATION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. AT A MINIMUM,UPDATES SHALL BE MADE DAILY TO TRACK CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS DESCRIBED IN THESEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTING THELOCATION OF THE JOB SITE TRAILER, TEMPORARY PARKING & LAYDOWN AREAS, PORTA-POTTY,WHEEL WASH, CONCRETE WASHOUT, FUEL & MATERIAL STORAGE, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS,AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION RELATED FACILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT STORMWATER RUNOFF.SWPPP UPDATES & AMENDMENTSThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C3-EROS PH2 PLAN.dwg November 06, 2023 - 7:58amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPHASE 1 BMP QUANTITIESSILT FENCE±130 LFINLET PROTECTION1 EAROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE1 EABIO ROLL340 LFEROSION CONTROL BLANKET3,650 SFKEYNOTE LEGENDSILT FENCEINLET PROTECTIONROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEBIO ROLL, OFFSET 3.0' FOR CLARITYEROSION CONTROL BLANKETABCDEAREA SUMMARYTOTAL PROPERTY AREA1.02 AC / 44,277 SFEXISTING PERVIOUS AREA0.11 AC / 4,838 SFEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA0.91 AC / 39,439 SFPROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA0.26 AC / 11,207 SFPROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA0.76 AC / 33,070 SFAREA LOCATED OUTSIDE PROPERTY LINE0.40 AC / 17,428 SFTOTAL DISTURBED AREA1.42 AC / 61,705 SF47 DO NOT ENTEREVPARKINGEVPARKINGSNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINES12.0'12.0'24.0'66.7'67.1'75.0' 84.0' 55.2' 55.6' 6.0'80.9'C1C2C1C2C16.0'6.0'6.0'5.0' 15.0' 18.0'30.2'9.0'18.0'6.0'8.3'C3C1C5P1P2P3P3P3S1S3S4R1R1R1R1R424.0'30.0'10.0'15.0'15.0'R734.2'19.3'C3R9.0'21.8'16.6'6.7'R3.0'R7.0'R7.0'R7.0'R13.0'R3.0'P44.0'P418.0'9.0'R3.0'R3.0'R3.0'C3R50.0'R74.0'R28.0'R16.0'R146.0'R92.0'11.5'35.7'6.4'R3.0'This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg November 06, 2023 - 7:58am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONRNORTHLEGENDSITE PLAN NOTES1. REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONSOF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDINGDIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSEDLIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.2. REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTINGEASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY &PARCEL INFORMATION.3. DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREASARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.4. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORRELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSEDWORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES,ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITHGOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORKSPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.5. TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 18-FEET INLENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.6. MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER.7. OUTDOOR SEATING IS ALLOWED AS AN ACCESSORY USE WITH THE FOLLOWINGCONDITIONS:7.1. THE THE USE IS LOCATED WITHIN 500 FT OF A RESIDENTIAL USE, AND NOSPEAKERS OR OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHICH EMIT SOUND PERMITTED.7.2. THE USE IS LOCATED WITHIN 500 FT OF RESIDENTIAL USE, AND THE HOUSE OFOPERATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO 7:00 AM TO 10:00 PMPREPARED FORSITE DIMENSIONPLANC4005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSTANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENTSEE DETAILS FOR SECTIONCONCRETE SIDEWALKSEE DETAILS FOR SECTIONLANDSCAPE AREASEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILSKEYNOTE LEGENDCURB, SIDEWALK & PAVEMENT6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (B612) - SEE DETAILCURB TRANSITION FROM 6" TO FLUSH - SEE GRADING PLANMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP - SEE DETAILINTEGRAL CONCRETE CURB / SIDEWALK - SEE GRADING PLANSITE FIXTURES6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD - SEE DETAILPAVEMENT MARKINGSACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL & LOADING AREA - SEE DETAILSTRIPED WHITE CROSS-HATCH AREA 4" SOLID LINES @ 45° 2' O.C.4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED SOLID PARKING LOT LINEPAINTED WHITE DIRECTIONAL ARROW - SEE DETAILSIGNAGEADA PARKING SIGN IN BOLLARD - SEE DETAILNO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGN - SEE DETAILSTOP SIGN - SEE DETAILDO NOT ENTER SIGN - SEE DETAILREFERENCE NOTESAT-GRADE BUILDING ENTRY & STRUCTURAL STOOP - REFER TOARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANSMONUMENT SIGN - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSLIGHT POLE & BASE - REFER TO SITE ELECTRICAL PLANRETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS) - REFER TO GRADING PLANTRANSFORMER/EQUIPMENT PAD - REFER TO MEP PLANSTRASH ENCLOSURE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSC1C2C3C4C5F1P1P2P3P4S1S2S3S4R1R2R3R4R6R748 SNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINES3.20%2.56%4.59%2.10%7.90%5.33%1.10%0.36%0.92%882.20882.20881.94881.94882.20881.51881.50881.95881.50885882882883884885885881881881881 882882882 883884880881880880 885879881882883884880 881882883875872873874876877878879880879881882883885882883884881886886885885884884885884886882.12882.05882.05882.20881.95882.07882.00882.15880879881G:885.25G:885.10G:882.96G:881.73G:882.98G:882.00G:882.18G:881.50G:881.94G:881.33G:881.23G:881.46G:881.45G:881.51G:880.73G:880.06G:879.62LP:881.84LP:881.01T/G:881.44T/G:881.44G:881.44881.62881.53882.01882.01T:881.79T:881.49T:879.573.28%3.76%3.02%3.26%882.140.40%0.51%0.39%0.73%1.39%5.53%5.12%1.70%0.00%6.69%5.39%ME:878.50ME:878.21ME:878.42ME:877.65ME:881.59ME:885.83ME:878.48G:880.08G:879.67G:880.02G:879.86G:879.38G:879.47G:880.58G:880.47G:881.10G:881.09G:881.00G:880.45G:878.69G:878.49G:878.38G:878.80G:879.00G:879.08881.27881.27881.40881.941.52%881.392.30%ME:885.61G:882.18G:883.59G:883.834.07%3.17%2.85%2.71%3.43%3.11%3.16%8818848838828858848834.09%This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg November 06, 2023 - 7:58am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTHGRADING PLAN NOTES1. PERFORM GRADING WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONSAND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.4. FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTINGTHE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.5. IN PAVED AREAS, ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE THE SITE READYFOR SUB-BASE.6. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TOHELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES.WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THEEXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTINGPAVEMENT.7. ELEVATIONS SHOWN REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES. SPOT ELEVATIONSALONG CURB & GUTTER REPRESENT THE FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED8. EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITYITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THECONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.9. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB ANDGUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES THAT PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE TOCOLLECTION POINTS. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 1.25% IN ASPHALT PAVEMENTAREAS AND A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS.10. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM SLOPE OF 0.50% ALONG CURB & GUTTER. REVIEW PAVEMENTGRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD THEGUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM THE GUTTER.11. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHES OF AGGREGATE BASE MATERIAL UNDER PROPOSEDCONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, SIDEWALKS, AND TRAILS UNLESS OTHERWISE DETAILED.12. GRADING FOR SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES, INCLUDING CROSSINGDRIVEWAYS, SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT STATE & NATIONAL ADA STANDARDS:ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 8.3% (1:12).SIDEWALK CROSS-SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0%.LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 5.0%.ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS AND ACCESS AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.0% IN ANYDIRECTION. A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 1.50% IS PREFERRED.SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADACOMPLIANT. NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANYLOCATION PRIOR TO PAVEMENT INSTALLATION. CHANGE ORDERS WILL NOT BEACCEPTED FOR ADA COMPLIANCE ISSUES.13. UPON COMPLETION OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES, RESTORE ADJACENT OFFSITEAREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION TO MATCH OR EXCEED THE ORIGINALCONDITION. LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4-INCHESOF TOPSOIL.14. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARYSEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS.PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINEEXISTING CONTOURPROPOSED CONTOUR925PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00LEGENDPROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0G:0.00T:0.00PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATIONT/G:0.0EOF:0.00.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONCODPROPOSED RIDGE LINEPROPOSED SWALEPROPOSED TOP/BOTTOM OF WALL ELEVATION TW:0.0BW:0.0RPREPARED FORGRADING ANDDRAINAGE PLANC5005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMN49 SNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINES880880885885885879879881881881881882882883883883884882882883884885882883884CONNECT TO EXISTING CBMHRE:873.66IE:871.50 S33 LF - 24" PVC@ 1.26%CB 100RE:881.84IE:873.45 ECBMH 101RE:881.01IE:873.11 WIE:873.11 NW880880885885885878878879879881881882882883884880881882883881882883884 CBMH 102RE:880.97IE:872.92 SEIE:871.92 ECBMH 103RE:878.62IE:871.92 NCOORDINATE WITH MEPIE:875.67 NECOORDINATE WITH MEPIE:875.47 SWIE:875.47 N20 LF - 8" PVC@ 1.00%36 LF - 12" PVC@ 1.00%(3) 160 LF 36" HDPP WITH WELDED JOINTSThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-STORM SEWER PLAN.dwg November 06, 2023 - 7:58am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTHPROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING)PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPERTY LINELEGENDPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED WATERMAINCOPROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING)PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUTPROPOSED RIPRAPPROPOSED FLARED END SECTIONDRPREPARED FORSTORM SEWERPLANC5015775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNSTORM SEWER NOTES1. INSTALL STORM SEWER IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY OR STATESPECIFICATIONS, STATE PLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE:RCP: ASTM C-76HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894PVC: ASTM D-2729PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794DRAIN TILE SHALL BE:PE: ASTM F-6667PVC: ASTM D-2729FITTINGS SHALL BE:RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE: ASTM D-3212PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-18664. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.5. FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES.NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTINGTHE PROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.6. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARYSEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TOTHE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS.7. EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ABANDONED UTILITYITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THECONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.8. COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OFTHE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS.9. WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVEDAREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATIONA MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE.10. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS.11. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED ANDWATER TIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITHNON-SHRINK GROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES.12. CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCALCODE REQUIREMENTS.UNDERGROUND STORMWATER SYSTEM:VOLUME PROVIDED: 4,764 CFWATER QUALITY PROVIDED: 2,768 CF18" ENGINEERING FILL IMPORT REQUIRED, 0.8 IN/HR.INCLUDE (4) 8" PERFORATED PVC PIPE FOR UNDERDRAIN50 SNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINESCOSSWR MH 102RE:882.38IE:869.36 EIE:869.26 WSSWR CO 103ARE:881.24IE:870.91 NWSSWR SERVICE CONNECTIONIE:871.14 NWSSWR MH 103RE:880.73IE:870.01 EIE:870.01 SIE:870.01 SEIE:869.91 WSSWR MH 104RE:880.11IE:870.35 SIE:870.40 EIE:870.30 WSSWR SERVICE CONNECTIONIE:870.81 NSSWR MH 105RE:879.97IE:870.47 SEIE:870.47 WSSWR SERVICE CONNECTIONIE:870.80 N73 LF - 8" PVC@ 0.40%23 LF - 6" PVC@ 2.00%33 LF - 6" PVC@ 2.00%18 LF - 8" PVC@ 0.40%137 LF - 8" PVC@ 0.40%40 LF - 6" PVC@ 2.00%45 LF - 6" PVC@ 2.00%6" X 6" TEE6" X 6" TEE6" X 6"TEE6" GATEVALVE6" GATEVALVE6" GATEVALVETWO (2)45° BENDS6" GATEVALVECOMMUNICATION & POWER SERVICE CONNECTION.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE CONNECTIONS TOEXISTING LINES WITH UTILITY PROVIDER (TYP.)SANITARY & WATERMAIN PIPECROSSING, SEE NOTE 26SANITARY & WATERMAINPIPE CROSSING, SEENOTE 26SANITARY & WATERMAINPIPE CROSSING, SEENOTE 26PIPE CROSSING8" STORM IE: 875.178" SANITARY CE: 871.07SEPARATION: 4.10'HYDRANT & 6"GATE VALVENATURAL GAS SERVICECONNECTION. CONTRACTORTO COORDINATECONNECTIONS TO EXISTINGLINES WITH UTILITYPROVIDER (TYP.)PIPE CROSSING8" STORM IE: 873.00'6" SANITARY CE: 870.44'SEPARATION: 2.56'PIPE CROSSING8" STORM IE: 875.186" SANITARY CE: 870.90SEPARATION: 4.28'10.0'6" DIP WATERMAINThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg November 06, 2023 - 7:58amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTHSANITARY SEWER MANHOLESANITARY SEWERWATERMAINGATE VALVEHYDRANTTEEREDUCERUNDERGROUND ELECTRICTELEPHONEGAS MAINSTORM SEWERLEGENDCOSANITARY CLEANOUTCOEXISTINGPROPOSEDPREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC6005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNUTILITY PLAN NOTES1. INSTALL UTILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE CITY SPECIFICATIONS, STATEPLUMBING CODE, AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.2. CONTACT STATE 811 CALL-BEFORE-YOU-DIG LOCATING SERVICE AT LEAST TWOWORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS.3. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL.4. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE:PVC SCH 40: ASTM D-1785, F-714, F-894SANITARY SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE:PVC SCH 40: ASTM D-2665, F-2794, F-18665. WATER MAIN PIPE SHALL BE:DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C115WATER MAIN FITTINGS SHALL BE:DUCTILE IRON: AWWA C-153, C-110, ASME 316.4 PVC SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED5. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE:RCP: ASTM C-76HDPE: ASTM F-714, F-894PVC: ASTM D-2729PVC SCH40: ASTM D-1785, D-2665, F-794DRAIN TILE SHALL BE:PE: ASTM F-6667PVC: ASTM D-2729STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE:RCP: ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443HDPE: ASTM D-3212PVC: ASTM D-2729, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212PVC SCH40: ASTM D-2665, F-794, F-18666. WHEN CONNECTING TO AN EXISTING UTILITY LINE, FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATION, DEPTH,AND SIZE OF THE EXISTING PIPE(S) PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF THE NEW LINES. NOTIFYTHE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS IMPACTING THEPROPOSED DESIGN OF THE PROJECT.7. PLACE AND COMPACT ALL FILL MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PROPOSEDUNDERGROUND UTILITIES. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET.8. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER ON ALL WATER LINES.9. FOR WATER LINES AND STUB-OUTS UTILIZE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCHAS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR ASINDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS.10. MAINTAIN 18-INCH MINIMUM VERTICAL SEPARATION WHERE SEWER PIPE CROSSESWATER LINES (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE).PROVIDE 10-FOOT HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE AND WATER LINES. N THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES,STORM LINES AND GAS LINES (OR ANY OBSTRUCTION EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THESANITARY PIPE MATERIAL SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40 OR PVC C900 AND HAVEMECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THECROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATEFASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18-INCH VERTICAL SEPARATIONMEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50).12. ALL PVC & HDPE SEWER AND WATER PIPE SHALL HAVE A TRACER WIRE INSTALLED IN THETRENCH AND TERMINATED PER THE DETAILS.13. UNDERGROUND UTILITY LINES SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED PRIORTO PLACING BACKFILL.14. IN PAVEMENT AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSEDFINISHED SURFACE GRADE. IN GREEN AREAS, RAISE MANHOLE CASTINGS TO BE ONEFOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATION & INSTALL A WATERTIGHT LID.15. REFER TO PLUMBING PLANS FOR LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OF UTILITY SERVICECONNECTIONS AND ROOF DRAINS TO THE INTERIOR BUILDING SYSTEMS. BACKFLOWDEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) & METERS ARE LOCATED INSIDE THE BUILDING.16. CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OFEXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THEVARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THEFIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THECONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURSBEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALLBE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIESWHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS.17. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/ORCERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES.COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS ANDSPECIFICATIONS.18. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLANS FOR SPECIFICATIONS OF THE PROPOSED SITELIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.19. EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLANS FOR LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED SANITARYSEWER, WATER MAIN, AND OTHER BUILDING UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS. REFER TOTHE GRADING PLAN FOR DETAILED SURFACE ELEVATIONS.20. EXCESS MATERIAL, ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNUSABLE MATERIALSSHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFFTHE CONSTRUCTION SITE.21. COORDINATE WITH THE PLUMBING PLANS FOR THE LOCATION, SIZE AND ELEVATION OFTHE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ROOF DRAIN CONNECTIONS.22. WHERE STORM SEWER ROOF DRAINS HAVE LESS THAN 4-FEET OF COVER IN PAVEDAREAS OR 3-FEET OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS, PROVIDE 3-INCH THICK INSULATIONA MINIMUM OF 5-FEET IN WIDTH, CENTERED ON THE PIPE.23. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE JOINTS SHALL BE WATER-TIGHT CONNECTIONS.24. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATERTIGHT. BOOTED COUPLERS AT THE STRUCTURE OR A WATER STOP WITH NON-SHRINKGROUT MAY BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCAL CODES.25. CONTRACTOR SHALL AIR TEST ALL STORM SEWER PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LOCALCODE REQUIREMENTS.26. AT SANITARY AND WATERMAIN CROSSINGS, CONTRACTOR SHALL RAISE WATERMAINABOVE SANITARY SEWER AND ENSURE A MINIMUM OF 18" OF VERTICAL SEPARATION.CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO INSULATE ALL WATERMAIN PER CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK CITYDETAIL WHERE 7.5' OF COVER CANNOT BE ACHIEVED27. WHEN POSSIBLE, WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM OF 5'HORIZONTAL SEPARATION MEASURED OUTSIDE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE OF PIPE.51 LANDSCAPE LEGENDEXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.)EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.)EDGER (TYP.)APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SEEDING/ SEEDINGALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.)AABCDLANDSCAPE KEYNOTESEDGER (TYP.)DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.)NOT USEDSOD (TYP.)EVPARKINGEVPARKINGSNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINES9 - SEM7 - GLS9 - SEM5 - DBH4 - BLC4 - BLC7 - IRD9 - DBH2 - BNO15 - HMS6 - BLC13 - DBH20 - HMS7 - IRD7 - DBH2 - BNO4 - SEM10 - ISG3 - SEM2 - IHL2 - IHL2 - IHL8 - GLS11 - ISG9 - MD9 - MD10 - ISG3 - SGJ5 - GLS3 - SGJ5 - GLS3 - SGJ10 - ISG9 - MD5 - DBH14 - KBL19 - MD7 - HMS3 - BHS5 - ISG3 - SGJ5 - BLC7 - HMS2 - HCK4 - SGJ5 - ISG12 - KBL8 - MD3 - QUC1 - HCK3 - WHPABABABBBBBBBDDDDACONIFEROUS TREECODEQTYCOMMON NAMEBHS 3 BLACK HILLS SPRUCEWHP 3 WHITE PINEORNAMENTAL TREECODEQTYCOMMON NAMEBNO 4 BEACON® OAKQUC 3 QUAKING ASPEN CLUMPOVERSTORY TREECODEQTYCOMMON NAMEHCK 3 COMMON HACKBERRYIHL 6 IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUSTCONIFEROUS SHRUBSCODEQTYCOMMON NAMESGJ 16 SEA GREEN JUNIPERDECIDUOUS SHRUBSCODEQTYCOMMON NAMEBLC 19 IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRYDBH 39 DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLEGLS 25 GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMACIRD 14 ISANTI REDOSIER DOGWOODSEM 25 SEM FALSESPIREAORNAMENTAL GRASSESCODEQTYCOMMON NAMEHMS 49 HEAVY METAL SWITCHGRASSISG 51 INDIAN STEEL INDIAN GRASSPERENNIALSCODEQTYCOMMON NAMEKBL 26 KOBOLD LIATRISMD 54 BEE BALMPLANT KEYThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.DWG November 06, 2023 - 7:58amBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONOVERSTORY TREES REQUIRED:17 TREES = 850 L.F. OF SITE PERIMETER / 50OVERSTORY TREES PROVIDED:18 TREESSHRUBS REQUIRED:102 SHRUBS = (850 L.F. OF SITE PERIMETER (6)) / 50SHRUBS PROVIDED:117 SHRUBSLANDSCAPE SUMMARYPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL1005775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNNORTHNOTE:PLANT QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE OWNER ANDJURISDICTIONAL REVIEW AGENCIES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORVERIFYING ALL PLANT QUANTITIES AS DRAWN.ABBREVIATIONS: B&B = BALLED AND BURLAPPED CAL. = CALIPER HT. = HEIGHT MIN. = MINIMUM O.C. = ON CENTER SP. = SPECIESQTY. = QUANTITYNOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY.NOTE: SEE FULL LANDSCAPE ON SHEET L10152 DO NOT ENTEREVPARKINGEVPARKINGSNOOZE3800 SFFFE: 881.50CHIPOTLE2300 SFFFE: 882.20SWEETGREEN2500 SFFFE: 882.20SHAKE SHACK3000 SFFFE: 881.50AREA TO BE RESTORED TO ORIGINALLAYOUT AFTER CONSTRUCTION OFUTILITY LINESThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GW Properties\St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\Exhibits\DORA EXHIBIT.dwg November 07, 2023 - 2:58pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONRNORTHLEGENDSITE PLAN NOTES1. REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONSOF STOOPS, TRUCK DOCKS, TRASH ENCLOSURES & PRECISE BUILDINGDIMENSIONS. REFER TO THE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR LOCATIONS OF PROPOSEDLIGHT POLES, CONDUITS, AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT.2. REFER TO CERTIFIED SITE SURVEY OR PLAT FOR EXACT LOCATION OF EXISTINGEASEMENTS, PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS, AND ADJACENT RIGHT-OF-WAY &PARCEL INFORMATION.3. DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE DRAWN TO THE FACE OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT, AND AREASARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT.4. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORRELOCATING EXISTING SITE IMPROVEMENTS THAT CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSEDWORK, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TRAFFIC SIGNS, LIGHT POLES,ABOVEGROUND UTILITIES, ETC. PERFORM WORK IN ACCORDANCE WITHGOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORKSPECIFICATIONS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID.5. TYPICAL PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS SHALL BE 9.0-FEET IN WIDTH AND 18-FEET INLENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.6. MONUMENT SIGN(S) ARE DETAILED ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND ARESHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY SIGN DIMENSIONS, LOCATION AND REQUIRED PERMITS WITH THE OWNER.7. OUTDOOR SEATING IS ALLOWED AS AN ACCESSORY USE WITH THE FOLLOWINGCONDITIONS:7.1. THE THE USE IS LOCATED WITHIN 500 FT OF A RESIDENTIAL USE, AND NOSPEAKERS OR OTHER ELECTRONIC DEVICES WHICH EMIT SOUND PERMITTED.7.2. THE USE IS LOCATED WITHIN 500 FT OF RESIDENTIAL USE, AND THE HOUSE OFOPERATION SHALL BE LIMITED TO 7:00 AM TO 10:00 PMPREPARED FORDORA EXHIBITEX-15775 W. WAYZATABLVD.GW PROPERTIESST LOUIS PARKMNPROPOSED CURB AND GUTTERPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED FENCESETBACK LINERETAINING WALLDRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTSTANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVMENTSEE DETAILS FOR SECTIONCONCRETE SIDEWALKSEE DETAILS FOR SECTIONLANDSCAPE AREASEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR DETAILSKEYNOTE LEGENDCURB, SIDEWALK & PAVEMENT6" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER (B612) - SEE DETAILCURB TRANSITION FROM 6" TO FLUSH - SEE GRADING PLANMATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTERACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP - SEE DETAILINTEGRAL CONCRETE CURB / SIDEWALK - SEE GRADING PLANSITE FIXTURES6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD - SEE DETAILPAVEMENT MARKINGSACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL & LOADING AREA - SEE DETAILSTRIPED WHITE CROSS-HATCH AREA 4" SOLID LINES @ 45° 2' O.C.4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED SOLID PARKING LOT LINEPAINTED WHITE DIRECTIONAL ARROW - SEE DETAILSIGNAGEADA PARKING SIGN IN BOLLARD - SEE DETAILNO PARKING FIRE LANE SIGN - SEE DETAILSTOP SIGN - SEE DETAILDO NOT ENTER SIGN - SEE DETAILREFERENCE NOTESAT-GRADE BUILDING ENTRY & STRUCTURAL STOOP - REFER TOARCHITECTURAL & STRUCTURAL PLANSMONUMENT SIGN - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSLIGHT POLE & BASE - REFER TO SITE ELECTRICAL PLANRETAINING WALL (BY OTHERS) - REFER TO GRADING PLANTRANSFORMER/EQUIPMENT PAD - REFER TO MEP PLANSTRASH ENCLOSURE - REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANSC1C2C3C4C5F1P1P2P3P4S1S2S3S4R1R2R3R4R6R7DORA REQUIREMENTSSF REQUIRED (12% LOT) = 5420 SFSF PROVIDED (13% LOT) = 5602 SFOUTDOOR RECREATION AREA (DORA)SEE NOTE FOR DETAILS53