Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023/10/16 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA OCTOBER 16, 2023 6:20 p.m. Economic Development Authority meeting 1.Call to order a.Roll call. 2.Approve agenda. 3. Minutes a.EDA meeting minutes of October 2, 2023 4.Consent items – none. 5.Public hearings – none. 6.Regular business – none. 7.Communications and announcements – none. 8. Adjournment. 6:30 p.m. City council meeting 1.Call to order a.Roll call. b.Pledge of Allegiance. 2.Approve agenda. 3.Presentations a.Proclamation declaring November, 2023 as Lung Cancer Awareness Month 4.Minutes a.Minutes of September 18, 2023 special study session b.Minutes of October 2, 2023 city council meeting c.Minutes of October 2, 2023 special study session 5.Consent items – business that generally does not require discussion or separate action. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If a separate vote is desired by either a council member or a member of the public, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the agenda under regular business. a.Second reading and adopt ordinance to rezone 1608 Utah Avenue b.Second reading and adopt ordinance to rezone 2840 Toledo Avenue c.Second reading and adopt ordinance to rezone 3301 Webster Avenue d.Resolution authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South e.Second reading and adopt ordinance establishing fees for 2024 f.Amending Resolution No. 23-028 authorizing cleanup at 3056 Edgewood Avenue South g.Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance Agenda EDA/city council/special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 6.Public hearings a.Resolution approving assessment of delinquent charges b.Consolidated public hearing Recommended action: Mayor to open public hearing, take testimony and close hearing. Motion to adopt resolutions setting the 2024 Special Service District budgets and property owner service charges. I.Resolution establishing 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 II.Resolution establishing 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 III.Resolution establishing 2024 budget and property owner service charges and ten- year extension for Special Service District No. 3 IV.Resolution establishing 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 V.Resolution establishing 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 VI.Resolution establishing 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 c.First reading of ordinance for moratorium on commercial cannabis activities 7.Regular business – none. 8.Communications and announcements – none. 9.Adjournment. City council special study session - immediately following city council meeting Discussion items 1. 60 min. Arrive and Thrive update and discussion 2. 30 min. Final watermain break budget report Written report 3. Wooddale station project update The St. Louis Park City Council meets in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Members of the public can attend the meeting in person, watch by webstream at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil, or watch on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17/HD channel 859). Recordings are available to watch on the city’s YouTube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/slpcable, usually within 24 hours of the end of the council meeting or study session. The council chambers is equipped with Hearing Loop equipment and headsets are available to borrow. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2505. Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Oct. 2, 2023 1. Call to order. President Mohamed called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m. a. Roll call. Commissioners present: President Nadia Mohamed, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Lynette Dumalag, Yolanda Farris, Margaret Rog, and Jake Spano Commissioners absent: none Staff present: City attorney (Mr. Mattick), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), planning manager (Mr. Walther), redevelopment administrator (Ms. Monson), community development director (Ms. Barton), economic development manager (Mr. Hunt) 2. Approve agenda. It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to approve the EDA agenda as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3. Minutes. a. EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 18, 2023 It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Farris, to approve the EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 18, 2023, as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Consent items. a. Approve EDA disbursements for the period of Aug. 26 to Sept. 22, 2023 b. EDA Resolution No. 23-23 approving amended and restated development contract for Union Park Flats c. Resolution approving Beltline Station contract amendments Economic development authority meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Economic development authority meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 Councilmember Rog requested that consent item 4c be moved to regular business as item 6a. Commissioner Brausen stated the $91,000 in EDA disbursements is money well spent and added the resolution approving amended and restated development contract for Union Park Flats has been discussed by the EDA in the past. This is to give the developer an opportunity to secure new financing because their primary lender dropped out, they have made significant changes to make the project commence this year, and he applauds their efforts. It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to approve the consent items as revised and to move consent item 4c to regular business; and to waive reading of all resolutions. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Public hearings – none. 6. Regular business. a. EDA Resolution No. 23-24 approving Beltline Station contract amendments Commissioner Rog noted this item references changes to agreements with Sherman and Associates related to the Beltline Station. She stated many of her constituents participated in the design process. She noted disappointment that the Met Council is requiring the developer to have a six to seven story parking ramp on the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. She stated one of the ways this was mitigated was through a redesign of the ramp, and that the EDA is being asked to consider significant redesign changes to the signature look. Commissioner Rog stated this will likely pass tonight, but folks will be disappointed with the redesign’s visual appearance, and that she does understand there are significant financial challenges facing developers. She stated she is disappointed with the ramp modifications and is hopeful that the council will not have to continue to approve additional modifications to this project going forward. Commissioner Spano agreed with Commissioner Rog’s comments and agrees there are stark differences between the two designs. He added he is hopeful for the option to make future updates to the parking ramp’s appearance and referenced the Target Field parking ramp façade. Commissioner Brausen agreed with the comments of Commissioners Rog and Spano, and noted the parking ramp near Steel Toe Brewing has a beautiful painted mural that aesthetically mitigates the feel of concrete. He hoped the developer might consider something similar in the near future. Economic development authority meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Economic development authority meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 President Mohamed agreed that the mural near Steel Toe Brewing is a creative example to consider for a future façade update. It was moved by Commissioner Rog, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to adopt EDA Resolution No. 23-24 approving Beltline Station contract amendments as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Communications and announcements – none. 8. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 6:36 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, EDA secretary Nadia Mohamed, EDA president Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Presentation: 3a Executive summary Title: Proclamation declaring November 2023 as “Lung Cancer Awareness Month” Recommended action: Mayor to read proclamation declaring November 2023 “Lung Cancer Awareness Month” Policy consideration: None. Summary: The American Lung Cancer Screening Initiative (ALCSI) is a team of over 200 doctors and students in the United States and Canado working to raise awareness for lung cancer and lung cancer screening. ALCSI is asking communities to declare November 2023 as “Lung Cancer Awareness Month”. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States, but it has been shown that lung cancer screening significantly reduces mortality as it can help to diagnose lung cancer earlier. However, only 5.7% of high-risk individuals are currently getting screened, which means thousands of lives are lost every year simply due to a lack of awareness – and this statistic has not changed since 2022. ALCSI is asking for help from communities across the United States to increase awareness of and promote screening for lung cancer. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Proclamation Prepared by: Amanda Scott-Lerdal, deputy city clerk Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Proclamation declaring November 2023 as “Lung Cancer Awareness Month” Resource page: To encourage community engagement around Lung Cancer Awareness Month, the City of St. Louis Park invites you to: • Learn about the history the American Lung Cancer Screening Initiative o American Lung Cancer Screening Initiative | ALCSI • Consider supporting the ALCSI by using and sharing screening resources o Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Assessment (partners.org) o SCREENING RESOURCES | ALCSI • Connect with advocacy and volunteer options to increase awareness for lung cancer within the state of Minnesota o ADVOCACY | ALCSI o JOIN | ALCSI City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Proclamation declaring November 2023 as “Lung Cancer Awareness Month” Proclamation “Lung Cancer Awareness Month” Whereas, lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death among men and women in the United States, accounting for more deaths than colon cancer, breast cancer and prostate cancer combined; and Whereas, lung cancer in individuals who had never smoked accounted for 20% of lung cancer deaths in 2018; and Whereas, according to the Centers for Disease Control, the year of 2020 brought 3,656 new lung cancer cases and 2,174 lung and bronchial cancer deaths in Minnesota; and Whereas, African Americans have the highest lung cancer incidence and mortality of all races, and disparities in lung cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment and mortality are well characterized among African Americans; and Whereas, each year more women die from lung cancer than breast cancer and by 2035, more women will die from lung cancer than men; and Whereas, the 5-year survival rate for localized lung cancer is approximately 60%, yet only approximately 25% of lung cancers are diagnosed at this stage; and Whereas, screening for lung cancer for high-risk individuals can lead to the earlier detection of lung cancer and save lives; and Whereas, lung cancer research is leading to breakthroughs in the identification of genetic alterations associated with lung cancer and in the development of lung cancer treatments; and Whereas, organizations such as the American Lung Cancer Screening Initiative and Women’s Lung Cancer Forum, are committed to educating about lung cancer and working to increase lung cancer screening rates in Minnesota; Now therefore, let it be known that the mayor and city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, hereby proclaim November 2023 as Lung Cancer Awareness Month in St. Louis Park, and encourage all people to learn about lung cancer and early detection through lung cancer screening. Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 16th day of October 2023. _________________________________ Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Minutes: 4a Unofficial minutes City council special study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Sept. 18, 2023 The meeting convened at 5:15 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Pro Tem Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Yolanda Farris, Lynette Dumalag, Nadia Mohamed and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: Mayor Jake Spano Staff present: City manager (Ms. Keller), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), community development director (Ms. Barton), director of communications and technology (Ms. Smith), parks and recreation director (Mr. West), race, equity and inclusion director (Ms. Guess), building and energy director (Mr. Hoffman), deputy police chief (Mr. Nadem), police chief (Mr. Kruelle) Discussion item: 1. Cannabis update Ms. Walsh presented the report. She stated the policy questions are: • Does the council want to enact an ordinance related to cannabis use by adults in public places? • Does the council want to amend the city code related to the sale of paraphernalia? • Does the council want to set a moratorium prohibiting the operation of cannabis businesses? Mr. Mattick explained the information related to a moratorium. Councilmember Budd asked about growing of cannabis. Mr. Mattick stated in general this would affect retail and related businesses such as testing facilities and cannabis transport. Retail is the immediate impact to cities and the moratorium would affect mass production businesses activities. It would not impact private growing and use. Mayor Pro Tem Brausen asked for clarification around home usage and cultivation, clarifying that the proposed moratorium would apply to business activity and not personal consumption. Mr. Mattick stated a moratorium would not affect use or purchase of cannabis and added the council cannot pass anything to prohibit possession or use. Councilmember Mohamed asked if the moratorium was intended to align city codes with state law. Ms. Keller responded that the current city ordinances regarding drug paraphernalia are currently unenforceable. Mr. Mattick added that in his opinion, the ordinances were written City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: City council special study session minutes of September 18, 2023 with cannabis or marijuana in mind Once the sale of cannabis becomes legal, these mechanisms for consumption cannot be prohibited. Councilmember Rog asked if the council does not pass a moratorium would they be obligated to make zoning changes around the ordinance. Mr. Mattick stated the moratorium would allow the council to have a perspective on zoning and location. Councilmember Rog stated the proposed moratorium may present both an advantage and a disadvantage to businesses as they try to plan ahead for location and sales. Ms. Walsh stated the moratorium will allow the council to be strategic in where to allow these businesses within the city. Ms. Keller added that out-of-state businesses that are ready to speculate on location and future regulation are likely not the types of emerging businesses that the council may be most interested in supporting. Mr. Mattick added that the moratorium would allow time to gather information and consider locations, assisting businesses in being prepared for the state office of cannabis management’s later requirements. Councilmember Budd asked how the moratorium would impact cultivation locations. Mr. Mattick stated it would be like a land use permit specifically for selling cannabis. There may be peculiarities about cultivating cannabis that may require additional considerations. Councilmember Dumalag stated she is in favor of a moratorium, adding it gives the council time to study the issue as it relates to land use. She added that cities have the ability to plan the use of land, and visitors coming and going from the city. She added she has concerns about well- capitalized entities securing multiple sites versus many small businesses having an equal opportunity to participate. She stated she is supportive of all three of staff’s proposals and the clarity they give businesses in the city. Councilmember Mohamed added she is also supportive of all three of staff’s proposals. She noted that she had been under the impression that that there were city rules in place already around cannabis use in public spaces. She mentioned a conversation with a constituent with concerns about usage in a public park, so the proposed moratorium will give council time to review and prepare. Councilmember Rog asked about the paraphernalia portion and asked if these changes would take place when state law is in place in the future, or if changes are proposed for immediate implementation. Ms. Walsh responded that city staff is recommending waiting to take action until after the 2024 legislative session gives more solid direction. Ms. Keller added that currently, the city may be out of alignment with state statute as well, as state law supersedes city regulation. Councilmember Rog noted she is supportive of the moratorium and is not in favor of staff’s recommendation on use in public places. She asked whether folks who rent in multi-family units are allowed to smoke marijuana. Mr. Mattick responded that no, people who are in multi- family units are not allowed to smoke marijuana in the unit. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Title: City council special study session minutes of September 18, 2023 Councilmember Rog stated that she equates cannabis with an intoxicant, and not as a smoked product. She stated that cannabis use should not be allowed in city parks in the same way that alcohol is not allowed in city parks or public places. She added that she would be looking into further information on the impacts of second-hand smoke from cannabis, and that was of lesser concern than the other effects of consuming an intoxicant. Councilmember Farris stated that in a recent visit to a city park, she took note of signs that say no smoking, so she recommends that rule apply for all smoking items, including cannabis. She noted that her expectation is for residents to be respectful in any decision for consumption or use in public spaces. Councilmember Mohamed asked whether there was any provision in state law regarding consumption or use in a public space where children are present. Mr. Mattick stated the state statute does specify where cannabis can be used. He pointed out that to make it enforceable, cities will need to create ordinances penalties and for noncompliance. He added that state statute defines noncompliant cannabis use as a petty misdemeanor with a fine, in keeping with decriminalization efforts. Ms. Keller clarified that staff’s recommendation is to continue to monitor as there have been no major upticks in usage or complaints to city staff about usage at this point. Ms. Walsh stated council will need to examine the effects of smoke or the effects of consumption, potentially including edibles. Councilmember Mohamed stated that she was in favor of the proposed moratorium to give staff time to analyze and state direction time to materialize in the 2024 legislative session. Councilmember Budd stated that homeownership presents a privilege in that residents can use cannabis in their yard and home, however in multifamily housing they are not allowed usage. She asked if the grounds in multifamily housing are considered private or public. Ms. Walsh responded that they are considered private, and the property owners’ policy prevails. Councilmember Budd asked for clarification that smoking marijuana is a violation of the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, Mr. Mattick confirmed that smoking tobacco or marijuana are both prohibited in multifamily units. Councilmember Mohamed added that renters often sign a document agreeing that they will not smoke in the unit. Councilmember Budd stated that she supported all three of staff’s recommendations. Mayor Pro Tem Brausen noted comments from Mayor Spano. Mayor Spano’s notes indicated he appreciates staff wanting to take the lightest approach possible and said there are benefits to guidance. Mayor Spano indicated that he does not agree with staff’s recommendations and would like to see guidelines on where residents can be reasonably sure that they will not be exposed to cannabis use, particularly second-hand smoke. Mayor Spano’s notes indicated that he does support the paraphernalia ordinance revisions and the proposed moratorium portions. Mayor Pro Tem Brausen stated he supports all three of the policy questions from staff, and added he has been a proponent of cannabis use for a long time. He stated being thoughtful and careful about planning makes sense to him. He added that he does have concerns for those City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4a) Page 4 Title: City council special study session minutes of September 18, 2023 living in multi-family housing who would have a difficult time with finding a space for legal usage. If people are not allowed to use cannabis in their apartment, nor on their landlord’s property, nor on public property, then they have no space to engage in a legal activity. He stated he has had two constituents contact him to ask for use to be outlawed in public spaces due to the smell of cannabis smoke. He added there is very little evidence that second-hand smoke will result in a “high,” and asked for further information on this. Mayor Pro Tem Brausen added that it would be tough line to draw between alcohol usage and cannabis use in a public park. Ms. Keller clarified that if intoxicated behavior is such that it needs to be addressed, then it would be addressed under the existing statutes already in place. Councilmember Rog added she is not supportive of actions being complaint driven. She stated her support in creating spaces for those in need of a legal space to engage in a legal activity, noting she is comfortable with those spaces created in many places within the city. She went on to say that she is protective of city parks. She noted it feels uncomfortable with the council’s position of allowing people to smoke cannabis in city parks, adding that she sees a compromise in cannabis use in other public spaces. Ms. Walsh stated the first reading of the moratorium would be October 16, 2023 and the second would be November 5, 2023 and it would take effect December 1, 2023. Ms. Keller summarized that staff direction is: • Continue to monitor cannabis use by adults in public spaces, understanding emerging issues with the legislature and coming up with creative solutions • Staff will continue to pursue an update to the ordinance regarding paraphernalia • Staff will continue to pursue the proposed moratorium on cannabis businesses and bring it back to council Councilmember Rog asked if there is an ordinance of no smoking in city parks. Ms. Walsh stated there is no enforceable ordinance, but there is a policy of no smoking in city parks. She added there is an ordinance against alcohol in parks. Councilmember Budd asked if there were other examples of public property besides parks. Mr. Mattick responded that what constitutes a public space has evolved in the last month, including conversation around spaces like trails, sidewalks, streets and some additional spaces where the public is commonly invited. Ms. Walsh also noted potential municipal sales and asked if the council is interested in having staff pursue the research needed if the council would be interested in continuing the conversation. She noted that there would be a state application, and the city would apply alongside other businesses. The council agreed they would like to explore the possibility of municipal sales of cannabis. Councilmember Budd stated she would appreciate more information to understand the city’s City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4a) Page 5 Title: City council special study session minutes of September 18, 2023 history with municipal liquor stores and how they work. Mayor Pro Tem Brausen added he supports the free market and would like to favor traditionally disenfranchised applicants. However, he does want to explore the idea of municipal sales as well. Written Reports: 2. Internship and career pathways approaches 3. Update on Via Sol development – Ward 2 Councilmember Mohamed referenced the career pathways report and stated she is very passionate about this program for youth and those starting careers. She highlighted items the city is doing to recruit, and added there are also opportunities within non-profit organizations that the city could partner with such as Genesis who actively recruit high school students. She added she is happy to hear there is 150% in recruitment tools. Councilmember Budd asked for clarification on the 43 new hires, whether they were brought on as interns or after their internships. Ms. Keller stated that they were hired to be interns. Mayor Pro Tem Brausen added the city is using a good job to bring in non-traditional candidates and he would like to see more non-traditional outreach to target the opportunities the city has. Ms. Keller pointed out that the new recruiter, whom Ms. Keller described as fantastic, utilizes both non-traditional outreach and traditional city government websites for the organization of applicants after outreach. Councilmember Dumalag noted the Via Sol report and asked about the updated commitments and if this is subject to requirements of the buyer. Ms. Keller stated there have been no formal requests as yet and anything at this point is speculation. Councilmember Dumalag stated she was happy to see there is a potential buyer and she appreciates staff work on this. Councilmember Rog stated she is disappointed with the long saga of this development. She stated there is speculation the e-generation and green parcel may be dropped, and she wondered what would then happen to that land dedicated for those facilities. Ms. Keller stated this will be discussed further and the city is watching this parcel. Councilmember Rog asked how these changes would help them to meet their obligations. Ms. Keller stated that will also be discussed. Councilmember Rog stated the EDA is at risk that a $500,000 loan would not be paid. Ms. Keller stated that is a risk. She noted the purpose of this report was to inform the council that if they ask for a change in terms, staff would negotiate and then bring it back to council for review. The meeting adjourned at 6:10 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Minutes: 4b Unofficial minutes City council meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Oct. 2, 2023 1. Call to order. Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 6:37 p.m. a. Pledge of allegiance b. Roll call Council members present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd, Lynette Dumalag, Yolanda Farris, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Council members absent: none Staff present: City attorney (Mr. Mattick), finance director (Ms. Cruver), deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), parks and recreation director (Mr. West), race, equity and inclusion director (Ms. Guess), planning manager (Mr. Walther), redevelopment administrator (Ms. Monson), senior planner (Ms. Chamberlain), community development director (Ms. Barton), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), natural resources manager (Mr. Bahe), police officer (Ms. Holloway) Guests: members of the public 2. Approve agenda. It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Dumalag, to approve the agenda as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3. Presentations. a. Proclamation for Indigenous People’s Day – Oct. 9, 2023 Mayor Spano read the proclamation. Council Member Brausen noted the city website has further information on Indigenous people, businesses, and organizations within the city and Minnesota. He appreciates the adoption of this proclamation. Council Member Budd stated that she did a day-long tour of sacred places of the Dakota people in Minnesota and learned a lot from the experience. She encouraged people to explore this deep history. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: City council meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 Mayor Spano also noted that Minnesota Lt. Governor Peggy Flanagan is a member of the Anishinaabe peoples. He added his native American neighbor recently passed away and, in her culture, the family starts a four-day fire which burns constantly and seeks to move the spirit on its journey. He noted city staff’s use of a diverse cultural lens around fire policy for this tradition, and pointed out that there are many ways to acknowledge cultures and change for the better within St. Louis Park. It was moved by Council Member Budd, seconded by Council Member Mohamed, to adopt the proclamation as presented. The motion passed 7-0. b. Recognition of 2023 Evergreen Award recipients Mr. Bahe presented the 2023 awards to residents, noting there were 18 nominations this year. Traditional Garden category winner at 2901 Colorado Ave: • Nicholas Heitkamp Mr. Heitkamp commented on his love for nature and connecting with the community’s positive feedback as driving forces in creating his home garden. He thanked his family for their support and encouragement. Alternative Garden category winner at 3156 Idaho Ave: • Jodi Johnston Ms. Johnston commented on her inspiration for her home garden and noted she had planted her “zinnia zoo” in memory of her beloved friend Marty Swanson who passed away from breast cancer. She dedicated her award to her friend and in her honor, will coordinate with the Park Nicollet Mammo-a-go-go Bus for early breast cancer screenings for underserved folks in the community. She added she is dedicating May 25th, her friend’s birthday, to a yearly event and that her friend’s memory is like an evergreen, steady, strong, protective, and eternal. Council Member Brausen and Mayor Spano noted they have planted trees and plants in memory of loved ones in their yards. Council Member Rog thanked both award recipients and gave thanks in advance for the lifesaving help that the breast cancer screening would provide the community. Council Member Mohamed thanked both recipients for making their neighborhoods beautiful. Council Member Farris stated that she looks forward to working with Ms. Johnston on the breast cancer awareness program soon. Mayor Spano asked Police Officer Holloway to stand so that attendees could see the pink police department patches on her uniform. The police department has patches and hats available as a fundraiser for breast cancer awareness. 4. Minutes. a. Minutes of Aug. 28, 2023 city council study session City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: City council meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 b. Minutes of Sept. 11, 2023 city council study session c. Minutes of Sept. 18, 2023 city council meeting It was moved by Council Member Rog, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to approve the city council study session minutes of Aug. 28 and Sept. 11, 2023, and the city council meeting minutes of Sept. 18, 2023, as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Consent items. a. Approve city disbursements for the period of Aug. 26 to Sept. 22, 2023 b. Second reading and adoption of Ordinance No. 2668-23 establishing public sewer and water utilities protection program c. Resolution No. 23-112 amending special assessment authorization for solar array at STEP – Ward 3 d. Resolution No. 23-113 to accept donation to parks and recreation department e. Resolution No. 23-114 approving amended and restated redevelopment contract for Union Park Flats – Ward 2 f. Resolution No. 23-115 approving vehicle towing and impound lot lease agreement g. Resolution No. 23-116 authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 2824 Sumter Avenue S h. Resolution No. 23-117 authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 3157 Jersey Avenue S i. Resolution No. 23-118 authorizing special assessment for sewer service line repair at 2753 Alabama Avenue S j. Resolution approving Beltline Station Development contract amendments – Ward 1 (This item was removed from the consent items and considered as regular agenda item 7e.) k. Resolution No. 23-119 approving minor amendment related to the Beltline Station Development - parking ramp façade – Ward 1 l. Resolution No. 23-120 authorizing condemnation of land for public purposes – Cedar Lake Improvement Project (4023-1100) m. Resolution No. 23-121 accepting work and authorizing final payment for 2023 street maintenance project (4023-1200) – Ward 4 n. Resolution No. 23-122 accepting work and authorizing final payment for watermain inspection support work (4022-5000) o. Resolution No. 23-123 accepting a grant from SAFER for the St. Louis Park Fire Department p. Resolution No. 23-124 approving deferral of special assessment at 450 Ford Road, Unit 218 Council Member Rog requested that consent item 5j be moved to regular business as item 7e. It was moved by Council Member Mohamed, seconded by Council Member Rog, to approve the consent items as revised and to move consent item 5j to regular business; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: City council meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 The motion passed 7-0. 6. Public hearings. a. First reading of ordinance adopting fees for 2024 Ms. Cruver presented the staff report. Council Member Brausen asked if the fees are calculated to be reflective of the services provided. Ms. Cruver stated that is correct, and the city does not make a profit from fees. She added many are also subsidized as well. Council Member Brausen pointed out fees allow all to participate in city programs. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Mohamed, to approve the first reading of ordinance adopting fees for 2024 and set the second reaching for Oct 16, 2023. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Regular business. a. Resolution No. 23-125 approving amendments to the comprehensive plan for property at 1639 Utah Drive – Ward 4 Ms. Chamberlain presented the staff report. Council Member Brausen asked when the parcel is sold, will it have a separate identification number. Ms. Chamberlain stated since the parcel does have its own PID with the county, the city does not need to approve this. Mr. Walther added one of the conditions of the sale is that they combine the parcels into one lot, so it is one PID and one tax parcel. This condition will prevent the city from becoming owner of the parcel through tax forfeiture. It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Dumalag, to adopt Resolution No. 23-125, approving amendments to the comprehensive plan for property at 1639 Utah Drive – Ward 4. The motion passed 7-0. b. Resolution No. 23-126 and first reading of ordinance approving amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning map for 2840 Toledo Ave. – Ward 1 Ms. Chamberlain presented the staff report. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: City council meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 Council Member Rog asked if there will be any change to residents’ access to this property since it is park and open space. Mr. Walther stated this approval does not affect any of the policies of that site, MnDOT has moved this property to city ownership, and this action does not set policy on how the property is maintained or accessed because the spaces are managed by Parks and Recreation. He added the city’s intention is to maintain the property as passive, open space and any changes would go through the comprehensive planning process. Council Member Rog noted some who are engaged with this parcel will wonder about future use of this space. Mayor Spano stated Parks and Recreation can speak further to this issue. Council Member Rog noted there are folks that have wanted to move in this direction and now this approval will make this official and area is now open space. It was moved by Council Member Rog, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to adopt Resolution No. 23-126 supporting the approval of an amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for the City of St. Louis Park under Minnesota Statutes 462.351 for the property located at 2840 Toledo Avenue S., and approve first reading of ordinance approving amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning map for 2840 Toledo Ave – Ward 1, and to set the second reading for Oct. 16, 2023. The motion passed 7-0. 7c. Resolution No. 23-127 and first reading of ordinance approving amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning map for 3301 Webster Avenue – Ward 1 Ms. Chamberlain presented the staff report. Council Member Rog clarified that the city does not own the parcel at this time, but that the city is preparing for conveyance to be swift when that time comes. She added this parcel is also a beloved space for residents. Ms. Chamberlain stated that is correct. Council Member Dumalag noted that it is exciting to add parks and public spaces and thanked staff for their work. It was moved by Council Member Rog, seconded by Council Member Brausen, to adopt Resolution No. 23-127, supporting the approval of an amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for the City of St. Louis Park under Minnesota Statutes 462.351 for the property located at 3301 Webster Avenue S., and approve first reading of ordinance approving amendments to the comprehensive plan and zoning map for 3301 Webster Avenue – Ward 1, and to set the second reading for Oct. 16, 2023. The motion was approved 7-0. d. First reading of ordinance amending the zoning map for 1608 Utah Avenue – Ward 4 Ms. Chamberlain presented the staff report. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: City council meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Mohamed, to approve first reading of ordinance amending the zoning map for 1608 Utah Avenue – Ward 4, and to set the second reading for Oct. 16, 2023. The motion was approved 7-0. e. Resolution No. 23-128 approving Beltline Station Development contract amendments – Ward 1 – (formerly 5j) Council Member Rog noted this item is related to changes in the contract with Sherman and Associates in the Beltline Station Development contract. The changes pertain to the parking ramp structure. She stated this ramp is on the Cedar Lake trail and there was significant community concern around there being such a large parking structure visible from the trail. She noted there was excitement about the redesign of this, but for financial reasons, Sherman and Associates has asked council to make changes to the contract that will change the ramp’s appearance and return it to a 7-story concrete ramp right on the trail. She stated she is very disappointed in this outcome, does not support these changes, and will vote against the contract amendments. She would like to see continued negotiations with Met Council as this is not the final design and she would like to see more creative problem-solving. Mayor Spano added city staff continues to negotiate regularly with Met Council, adding he hopes there is a creative solution to be found. He stated he will support the contract amendments and noted that approving the resolution before them does not change the city’s ability to advocate for changes. Council Member Budd noted she was not aware of the community input on this and will join Council Member Rog’s vote against the contract amendments, noting it is unfortunate to change the design at this stage. Council Member Brausen stated he will support this contract amendment, adding financing is always difficult to obtain for this massive project. He noted along the Cedar Lake trail, there are several industrial areas, and the city has not had input on those. The city did have input on the Beltline Station Development and has made clear the desire to have community art featured. He stated that it seemed unreasonable to hold up the entire project. Council Member Rog noted deadlines have continued to be moved on this project, so the idea of delay does not hold concern for her. Council Member Dumalag stated she appreciates Council Member Rog’s comments, and it is disappointing to hear of the parking structure design changes. She is hopeful there are creative ways to overcome the look of the structure with art in the future, adding she will support the contract amendments. It was moved by Council Member Brausen, seconded by Council Member Dumalag, to adopt Resolution No. 23-128 approving Beltline Station Development contract amendments – Ward 1. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: City council meeting minutes of Oct. 2, 2023 The motion was approved 5-2 (Council Members Rog and Budd opposed). 8. Communications and announcements. Ms. Walsh noted the State of the Community event will take place from 4:30 – 6 p.m. on Wednesday, Oct. 11, at 10 West End in St. Louis Park. Council Member Dumalag thanked the League of Women Voters for hosting the forums for mayor and at-large council candidates, noting it was well attended and appreciated. 9. Adjournment. The meeting adjourned at 7:37 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Minutes: 4c Unofficial minutes City council special study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Oct. 2, 2023 The meeting convened at 5:15 p.m. Council members present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Sue Budd (arrived 5:21 p.m.), Yolanda Farris, Lynette Dumalag, Nadia Mohamed and Margaret Rog Council members absent: none Staff present: Deputy city manager (Ms. Walsh), communications and technology director (Ms. Smith), planning manager (Mr. Walther), redevelopment administrator (Ms. Monson), community development director (Ms. Barton), economic development manager (Mr. Hunt), housing supervisor (Ms. Olson), administrative services director (Ms. Brodeen), city clerk (Ms. Kennedy) Discussion items 1. Housing and neighborhood-oriented development system introduction Ms. Barton presented the staff report along with Mr. Walther, Mr. Hunt, Ms. Monson and Ms. Olson. Council Member Budd asked if there are a total of 464 units in the 4D program. Ms. Olson stated this was correct, housing providers must commit to a minimum of 20% of their units and most properties who applied exceeded the requirement with 40% to 80% of their units committed as affordable. She confirmed that 464 units have the tax incentive. Ms. Barton added the tax incentive is only for those kept affordable. Council Member Rog asked if any applications were approved. Ms. Olson stated that the timeline for housing providers who applied for state certification in 2023 is to receive the benefits in 2024. Council Member Rog asked about the 80% area median income that is counted toward affordable housing goals and providing incentives for, how does staff feel about not monitoring and leaving it on the city’s system for property developers and managers? Ms. Olson stated if they have tax credit, this process takes place through MN Housing. She added in the city’s inclusionary housing policy, 80% is not required. The options are at 30%, 50% or 60% of area median income, or AMI. Council Member Rog asked why 80% AMI is mentioned in the report if it is not a requirement. Ms. Barton stated usually 80% is not typically included as an option; it was with the Via Sol City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: City council special study session of Oct. 2, 2023 project at the time of its negotiation. She reiterated that 80% of area median income is not part of the inclusionary housing policy, it is tracked for Met Council goal requirements. 2. Community development year in review Council Member Brausen asked if staff recommends the city readjust the inclusionary housing policy to just the 30% AMI. Council Member Mohamed added it is a challenge to get more units in the city at 30% AMI, adding she is very hopeful for this outcome. Ms. Barton stated staff are working on getting more 30% AMI units, including larger units constructed to meet the Met Council goals set for 2030. Ms. Olson summarized that the goal is not the same as the need – the need for more affordable housing is still there, and the city is still working to fill that need. Council Member Rog stated we are not counting the 30% AMI in the voucher program and asked staff to speak on this. Ms. Barton responded that vouchers are not counted in the total number of units being constructed because the voucher goes with the household and not with the unit. She noted that 30% AMI affordable units are difficult to create because of the extensive subsidies that are needed to construct the units. Vouchers are another way to help households get into housing that is affordable to them at 30% AMI. Council Member Rog asked how many vouchers are used in St. Louis Park, noting the end result is the cost to the renter. Council Member Dumalag added it is also up to the building owners if they accept the vouchers. Ms. Olson stated owners are required to accept vouchers and noted the compliance is that tenants are renting at the correct amounts and that with screening, they are meeting the income minimums and requirements. Ms. Barton noted that the League of Minnesota Cities and Metro Cities have added language to their 2024 legislative priorities supporting legislation prohibiting discrimination of source of income for rental housing. Council Member Mohamed asked what the city’s plan is for housing vouchers if the federal government shuts down. Ms. Olson stated typically funds are drawn down monthly and a plan was in place for these drawdowns through December in case the government shuts down in November. Council Member Mohamed asked if it is more difficult to get housing vouchers within the suburbs versus larger cities. Mr. Olson stated that has not been an issue for St. Louis Park and that the city had to add another staff person to manage all of the additional vouchers. Mayor Spano asked when the Project for Pride in Living project will be breaking ground. Ms. Monson stated they close on finances the week of Oct. 16, 2023, and then they will start construction. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Title: City council special study session of Oct. 2, 2023 Mayor Spano asked how timing is communicated with the school district with openings of new developments. Ms. Monson stated staff meets with the school district development group once per year. She added they also receive a quarterly update, as does the council. Mr. Hunt added the school district also attends the monthly business development meetings where information is shared regularly on projects. Council Member Dumalag noted there is a school board liaison on the planning commission as well. Council Member Rog asked about the quarterly updates and how often they come through. Ms. Monson stated they are distributed quarterly and the next one will be Oct. 23, 2023. Council Member Rog asked what kind of oversite the housing authority provides. Ms. Olson stated primarily they provide oversite of the federal programs and housing budget. They approve the housing authority budgets and resolutions and then staff present these to HUD, and they also provide oversight to make sure the city stays in compliance. Council Member Budd asked for clarification on the vouchers. Ms. Olson stated some vouchers are provided to the tenants and can be used at multiple developments and some are project- based vouchers that stay with the development and that tenants cannot take to other locations. The meeting recessed at 6:22 p.m. The meeting reconvened at 7:51 p.m. 3. Boards and commissions program: purpose and structure Ms. Brodeen presented the staff report and noted the policy consideration before the council was if the purpose of the boards and commission program should be to support community- informed decision-making and develop leaders in St. Louis Park. Council Member Mohamed noted the program design options and stated this conversation has been a long time coming. She expressed concerns about this process as council keeps coming back to it, but noted she is in favor of staff’s recommendations. Council Member Mohamed stated there is an opportunity to be intentional about this process and pull from different parts of the community for input. She stated she likes the task force model, and how the smaller group might be more attractive to drawing new people into these groups. She stated the proposed number of 25 members might be limiting, and that council will need to be very intentional about recruiting for membership. Council Member Farris added it would be awesome for the current commissioners to mentor the new members and collaborate. Ms. Brodeen replied that the structure and implementation of a mentorship program has been discussed. She added the city has a strong volunteer program and is looking at how to build programs that are better connected and fit the needs of people who want to participate. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4c) Page 4 Title: City council special study session of Oct. 2, 2023 Mayor Spano clarified that the statutorily required commissions are still required, the focus of this conversation is purpose alignment for the five boards within the city that are not statutorily required. Council Member Dumalag stated this is a great way to involve volunteers for a finite period and to transparently share expectations with board members. She added there have always been challenges getting youth members onto boards and commissions, and the proposed structure would be a great way to ask a student for a period of their time. She asked staff to be mindful of planning the communication structure and gave the example of a board member with a great idea matriculating through staff and city manager to council. Council Member Budd stated she has not served on a board or commission, and she did not know about this structure until she was elected to council. She recalled being excited to do some interviews for commissioners and was encouraged by the process. She asked if there is a way to modify what is currently in existence, with respect to parliamentary procedure and open meeting laws, adding that one of the unique practices of boards and commissions is that they do report directly to the council. Ms. Brodeen responded that staff had given a great deal of consideration to retaining and improving current structure, with communication as to what other cities are doing. Because boards and commissions are currently bodies that are set by the council and technically may make recommendations to the council, the open meeting law and parliamentary procedure are required, even at the subcommittee level. Ms. Kennedy affirmed that the proposed group of 25 advisors would still be subject to open meeting law. However, the proposed task groups would not be required to follow the same requirements, primarily because of the proposed shift to have the program report up through the city manager. The thought is to create more opportunities for people to participate and engage on topics they really care about without as much formality or commitment. She pointed out that the current structure and framework were established, in some cases, over 60 years ago. Restriction to participation resulting from these requirements was a common response in feedback and outreach. Under the proposed structure, decisions would shift from formal recommendations to timely input, as a function of engagement. Council Member Rog said her primary concern is around staff being the funnel and the way council will get information from the community. She stated she has heard from board and commissions members that sometimes comments do not make it directly to council. She stated the proposed structure could worsen problems that are already occurring within the current structure. Council Member Rog stated when residents are selected to serve on a board or commission, they are very excited. She asked how we harness that expertise and direct relationship with council and will we potentially miss this expertise. She also asked if staff would select the members of boards and commissions. Ms. Brodeen stated that staff could be involved in selection and bring recommendations to council for consideration, but no process has been finalized yet because the purpose of the program needs to be established first. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4c) Page 5 Title: City council special study session of Oct. 2, 2023 Ms. Kennedy stated that feedback from this council and past councils is that the selection process was time-consuming for council members; the proposed system would be a compromise. Council Member Rog stated her greatest concern would be to lose folks on the larger body of the proposed commission, because the selection process will go through staff to council, which is a change. Mayor Spano noted the discussion topic is a big change. He asked about the possibility of three- year terms, or whether one-year terms could be renewed up to three times to reduce obligation. He suggested shifting the current boards and commissions from parliamentary procedure to the input-based structure, so as not to be encumbered by that. He asked for more information on whether a shift is possible before completely abandoning the current structure. Mayor Spano asked how equity considerations and diversity will come out of the proposed model and how the result would be a different product from the repurposing of commissions. Ms. Brodeen gave an example of different outcomes in participation by addressing the barriers to physical attendance. She added that in all models, there is an opportunity to be more deliberate about outreach and helping all to participate. She added with the engagement coordinator that staff hopes to hire, the city will be able to work more intentionally on building these relationships with and between constituents and council. Council Member Mohamed asked if there is enough work for each of the commissions. Ms. Brodeen replied that currently, there is variance in the flow of meaningful work. She stated this is also one of the key aspects the proposed model would address. Council Member Mohamed stated she had worked to recruit a fellow resident to commission work. The fellow resident is a mother of children who did not apply because the lack of ability to attend commission work virtually was her deciding factor. Council Member Mohamed queried whether a smaller advisory board model might provide the ability to offer a stipend or other forms of appreciation for input and participation. She asked if being intentional with a smaller group under the proposed structure might allow for thanking residents for their time and knowledge. She listed providing food, childcare and attendance assistance as potential ways to overcome barriers to participation. Mayor Spano agreed and asked whether these appreciation tangibles were available under the current boards and commission framework. Ms. Kennedy responded that staff is reviewing the legality of offering stipends or other types of assistance. Mayor Spano expressed his desire for more clarity on questions related to the concerns he has at this point. He asked the city council to come to a clear consensus on what they want out of the boards and commissions program. His main concern is creating a small insular group that influences council by choosing whose voice reaches the decision makers. Council Member Brausen stated that he has served on boards and commissions over the years and thanked members for their service. He stated he supports staff’s recommendations because there does need to be a shift from a recommendation system to an input system. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4c) Page 6 Title: City council special study session of Oct. 2, 2023 Council Member Brausen added that the proposed structure would be more nimble, responsive and manageable, providing a mechanism for real-time input from the community. He noted staff can present a range of issues to specific task forces, encouraging cross-topic collaboration and that the REI impacts will be noticeable. Council Member Brausen added that the proposed structure is similar to how the city has invited experts to serve with work groups within the Environment and Sustainability Commission. He appreciated staff thinking strategically on how to better utilize the talents of folks serving on commissions. He added that if the proposed structure does not work it can be updated again. Council Member Dumalag stated that the proposed structure will address the barriers to serving with respect to demographics. She added that the new structure would bring timelines for feedback into a realistic space, and residents getting to know each other in the context of smaller task force groups is an added benefit. Council Member Rog stated that she agreed that change needs to happen. Elements like childcare and term durations could be implemented in alignment with the city’s strategic priorities. She added that her concern is that there may be more applicants than open spaces for serving, and that with the proposed structure, we are reducing the number of engaged residents further. Council Member Rog added she would like to attend meetings, whether under the current or changed structure, to engage directly. Ms. Brodeen stated that the proposed structure meetings would be open to the public to attend and would have remote/virtual attendance flexibility as well. Ms. Kennedy stated she also was concerned about the number of open spaces to serve. She explained that in the current structure, two or three people fill vacant positions per year on each board or commission. She added that the goal is to create more opportunities for people to engage as they want to through the smaller bodies. Mayor Spano stated that there are currently 53 people serving on five commissions, and engagement would likely remain at that same level when considering the additional public participation with topic-focused work groups. Ms. Brodeen explained that the primary body of 25 people would be able to help create smaller work groups made up of a few members of the primary body and members of the public. Ms. Kennedy added that the city would hope to combine with the existing volunteer program network work to make opportunities more widely available to the larger public. Mayor Spano added his concern that task force leaders may hand-pick fellow participants that are like-minded. Ms. Kennedy stated that is why staff would need to be part of the process to set these groups up and assist in facilitation. Ms. Brodeen stated staff has scheduled visits with the current members of the city’s boards and commissions. The plan is to bring more details back to the council before the end of this year. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 4c) Page 7 Title: City council special study session of Oct. 2, 2023 Ms. Walsh summarized that four council members are in support of staff’s policy considerations, while three still have more questions. She added staff is very much aware of and has had similar questions to what the council is bringing up, and noted that council agrees that any structure, whether current or proposed, seeks to convene a group of residents with a variety of backgrounds, experiences and interests. Ms. Walsh reminded the council that there will be no final decisions tonight, and staff is looking for direction on whether to proceed work on this topic for future discussion. Council Member Brausen added that council will seek input from constituents as well. Ms. Brodeen thanked the council for thinking broadly. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Written Reports 4. Cultural observances ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Consent agenda item: 5a Executive summary Title: Zoning map amendment for 1608 Utah Avenue S (Ward 4) Recommended action: Motion to adopt second reading of ordinance amending the zoning map from R-1 single-family residence to POS park and open space and approve summary ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed zoning map amendment? Summary: The city proposes to rezone the property at 1608 Utah Avenue S. from R-1 single- family residence to POS park and open space. The purpose of the rezoning is to limit the activity on this site to park and open space uses. The POS park and open space district is consistent with the PRK park and open space land use designation for the site in the comprehensive plan. Previous actions Governing body Date Public hearing conducted, and no comments were received. Recommended approval. Planning commission 8/16/2023 Item considered; recommended approval Park and recreation advisory committee 9/20/2023 First reading of ordinance City council 10/2/2023 Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Draft ordinance, summary ordinance Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5a) Page 2 Title: Zoning map amendment for 1608 Utah Avenue S (Ward 4) Ordinance No. ___-23 Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park official zoning map The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission and parks and recreation advisory commission (case no. 23-10-Z). Section 2. The St. Louis Park official zoning map is hereby amended by changing the zoning district boundary to reclassify the property described below from R-1 Single-family Residence to POS Park and Open Space: Outlot 2, Second Country Club Addition of Westwood Hills, Hennepin County, Minnesota Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading October 2, 2023 Second reading October 16, 2023 Date of publication October 26, 2023 Date ordinance takes effect November 10, 2023 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5a) Page 3 Title: Zoning map amendment for 1608 Utah Avenue S (Ward 4) Exhibit A: Excerpt from zoning map City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5a) Page 4 Title: Zoning map amendment for 1608 Utah Avenue S (Ward 4) SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION Ordinance No. ____-23 An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the property located at 1608 Utah Aveue S from R-1 single-family residence to POS park and open space. This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: October 26, 2023 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Consent agenda item: 5b Executive summary Title: Zoning map amendment for 2840 Toledo Avenue S. (Ward 1) Recommended action: Motion to adopt second reading of ordinance amending the zoning map from R-2 single-family residential to POS park and open space and approve summary ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed zoning map amendment? Summary: The City of St. Louis Park proposes a zoning map amendment to change the zoning designation of property generally located at 2840 Toledo Ave. S. from R-2 single-family residence to POS park and open space. The property was former MnDOT right-of-way from Highway 100; recently MnDOT conferred the property to the City of St. Louis Park for use as park and open space. The city council, on October 2, 2023 approved the application for a comprehensive plan amendment and the first reading of the ordinance amending the zoning map. The comprehensive plan amendment has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council. Previous actions Governing body Date Public hearing conducted, and three comments in favor of the land use change from the public. Recommended approval. Planning commission 8/16/2023 Item considered; recommended approval. Park and recreation advisory committee 9/20/2023 Comprehensive plan amendment and first reading of ordinance approved. City council 10/2/2023 Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Draft ordinance, summary ordinance Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5b) Page 2 Title: Zoning map amendment for 2840 Toledo Avenue S. (Ward 1) Ordinance No. ___-23 Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park official zoning map The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (Case No. 23-14-Z). Section 2. The St. Louis Park official zoning map is hereby amended by changing the zoning district boundary to reclassify the property described below from R-2 Single-family Residence to POS Park and Open Space: Parcel 28 C.S. 2735 (100=5-31-5) All of Tract A described below: Tract A. That part of the east 25.75 rods of the west 46.75 rods of the Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 31, Township 29 North, Range 24 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the South Quarter corner of said Section 31; thence westerly along the south line of said Section on an azimuth of 270 degrees 07 minutes 44 seconds for 1963.98 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B20919 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 27-209, as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for said County; thence on an azimuth of 00 degrees 26 minutes 07 seconds for 629.71 feet; thence on an azimuth of 270 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds for 38.34 feet; thence on an azimuth of 354 degrees 32 minutes 35 seconds for 143.36 feet to the point of beginning of Tract A to be described; thence on an azimuth of 246 degrees 35 minutes 01 second for 28.26 feet; thence on an azimuth of 304 degrees 41 minutes 05 seconds for 150.94 feet; thence on an azimuth of 359 degrees 35 minutes 14 seconds for 202.62 feet; thence on an azimuth of 90 degrees 00 minutes 01 second for 154.17 feet; thence on an azimuth of 180 degrees 32 minutes 56 seconds for 277.29 feet to the point of beginning and there terminating; containing 38,331 square feet, more or less. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment approved by city council resolution ___-23 and not sooner than 15 days after publication. First reading October 2, 2023 Second reading October 16, 2023 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5b) Page 3 Title: Zoning map amendment for 2840 Toledo Avenue S. (Ward 1) Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney Date of publication October 26, 2023 Date ordinance takes effect Upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than November 10, 2023. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5b) Page 4 Title: Zoning map amendment for 2840 Toledo Avenue S. (Ward 1) Exhibit A: Excerpt from zoning map City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5b) Page 5 Title: Zoning map amendment for 2840 Toledo Avenue S. (Ward 1) SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION Ordinance No. ____-23 An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the unaddressed property located approximately at 2840 Toledo Avenue S from R-2 single-family residence to POS park and open space. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: October 26, 2023 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 2, 2023 Consent agenda item: 5c Executive summary Title: Zoning map amendment for 3301 Webster Avenue S. (Ward 1) Recommended action: Motion to adopt second reading of ordinance amending the zoning map from R-2 single-family residential to POS park and open space and approve summary ordinance publication. Policy consideration: Does the city council support the proposed zoning map amendment? Summary: The City of St. Louis Park proposes a zoning map amendment to change the zoning designation of property located at 3301 Webster Avenue S from R-2 single-family residence to POS park and open space. The city has historically leased a portion of this site from MnDOT for use as Webster Park. MnDOT recently approached the city about selling the property to the city, as they no longer had use for the property for right-of-way. The city proposes to amend the comprehensive plan land use map designation for the property from ROW – Right-of-way to PRK – Park and Open Space. Upon the land use designation being placed into effect, the city proposes the property be rezoned from R-2 single-family residence district to POS park and open space district. The city council, on October 2, 2023 approved the application for a comprehensive plan amendment and the first reading of the ordinance amending the zoning map. The comprehensive plan amendment has been submitted to the Metropolitan Council. Previous/future actions Governing body Date Public hearing conducted, and one comment in favor of the land use change from the public. Recommended approval. planning commission 8/16/2023 Item considered; recommended approval Park and recreation advisory committee 9/20/2023 Comprehensive plan amendment and first reading of ordinance approved. City council 10/2/2023 Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Draft ordinance, summary ordinance Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 2, 2023 (Item No. 5c) Page 2 Title: Zoning map amendment for 3301 Webster Avenue S. (Ward 1) Ordinance No. ___-23 Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park official zoning map The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (case no. 23-16-Z). Section 2. The St. Louis Park official zoning map is hereby amended by changing the zoning district boundary to reclassify the property described below from R-2 Single-family Residence to POS Park and Open Space: C.S. 2706 (7=12-28-3) Parcels 128A, 128B, 128C, 128D, 128E, 128F, 128G, 129 Rev., 2128C C.S. 2735 (100=130-31-5) Parcels 22 and 23 That part of Tracts A, B and C described below: Tract A. Lots 55 through 67 inclusive, Norwaldo, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; Tract B. Lot 1, Block 223, Rearrangement of St. Louis Park, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; Tract C. Block 8, Lewiston Park, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; which lies southerly of Line 1 described below, easterly and northerly of Line 2 described below, and northerly, westerly and southerly of Line 3 described below: Line 1. Beginning at Right of Way Boundary Corner B20908 as shown on Minnesota Department of Transportation Right of Way Plat No. 27-209 as the same is on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota; thence easterly on an azimuth of 90 degrees 59 minutes 53 seconds along the boundary of said plat for 128.10 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B20909; thence defect to the left on a tangential curve, having a radius of 54.42 feet and a delta angle of 40 degrees 53 minutes 51 seconds for 38.84 feet; thence on an azimuth of 50 degrees 06 minutes 02 seconds for 274.59 feet and there terminating; Line 2. Beginning at the point of beginning of Line 1 described above; thence southerly on an azimuth of 179 degrees 47 minutes 53 seconds along the boundary of said Plat No. 27-209 for 360.07 feet to Right of Way Boundary Corner B20907; thence on an azimuth of 91 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds City council meeting of October 2, 2023 (Item No. 5c) Page 3 Title: Zoning map amendment for 3301 Webster Avenue S. (Ward 1) for 17.14 feet; thence on an azimuth of 181 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds for 199.88 feet and there terminating; Line 3. Beginning at a point on Line 2 described above, distant 64.26 feet northerly of its point of termination (measured along said Line 2); thence on an azimuth of 91 degrees 02 minutes 59 seconds for 38.68 feet; thence on azimuth of 35 degrees 07 minutes 17 seconds for 131.14 feet; thence on an azimuth of 37 degrees 50 minutes 46 seconds for 219.86 feet; thence on an azimuth of 52 degrees 34 minutes 18 seconds for 77.41 feet; thence on an azimuth of 77 degrees 28 minutes 40 seconds for 51.31 feet; thence on an azimuth of 43 degrees 16 minutes 03 seconds for 77.78 feet; thence on an azimuth of 28 degrees 32 minutes 47 seconds for 84.20 feet; thence on an azimuth of 15 degrees 52 minutes 21 seconds for 42.77 feet; thence on an azimuth of 270 degrees 19 minutes 30 seconds for 171.44 feet; thence on an azimuth of 359 degrees 46 minutes 47 seconds for 117.37 feet to an intersection with Line 1 described above and there terminating; Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment approved by city council resolution ___-23 and not sooner than 15 days after publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading October 2, 2023 Second reading October 16, 2023 Date of publication October 26, 2023 Date ordinance takes effect Upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than November 10, 2023. City council meeting of October 2, 2023 (Item No. 5c) Page 4 Title: Zoning map amendment for 3301 Webster Avenue S. (Ward 1) Exhibit A: Excerpt from zoning map City council meeting of October 2, 2023 (Item No. 5c) Page 5 Title: Zoning map amendment for 3301 Webster Avenue S. (Ward 1) SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION Ordinance No. ____-23 An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the property located at 3301 Webster Avenue S from R-2 single-family residence to POS park and open space. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: October 26, 2023 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Consent agenda item: 5d Executive summary Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 07-028-24-11-0093. Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the city council. Summary: Kathleen Reilly, owner of the single-family residence at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South, has requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for her home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy. The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by city staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $5,500. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Beth Holida, office assistant Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessing technician Austin Holm, utilities superintendent Kala Fisher, public services superintendent / deputy public works director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5d) Page 2 Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South Resolution No. 23 - ____ Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 07-028-24-11-0093 Whereas, the property owner at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South, has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single-family residence located at 3912 Inglewood Avenue South; and Whereas, the property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and Whereas, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line; and Now therefore be it resolved by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the property owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $5,500. 4. The property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, city charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The property owner has agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 4.93%. 6. The property owner has executed an agreement with the city and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Consent agenda item: 5e Executive summary Title: Second reading and adopt ordinance establishing fees for 2024 Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt ordinance establishing fees for 2024 as outlined in Appendix A of the City Code of Ordinances. Policy consideration: Is council supportive of the proposed fees staff believes are commensurate with the cost of the various services the city provides? Summary: Each year, all city fees are reviewed as part of the budget process, based on comparison to other cities in the metro area, changes in regulations and to ensure our business costs are covered for corresponding services. Council is asked to approve the Appendix A items since those are within our city code. Other city fees are set administratively. Financial or budget considerations: The proposed fee changes have been incorporated into the preliminary 2024 budget. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Proposed ordinance with fees Summary ordinance Prepared by: Amelia Cruver, finance director Reviewed by: Cheyenne Brodeen, administrative services director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5e) Page 2 Title: Second reading and adopt ordinance establishing fees for 2024 Ordinance No. ____-22 Ordinance adopting fees for calendar year 2024 The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. Fees called for within individual provisions of the city code are hereby set by this ordinance for calendar year 2024. Section 2. The attached Fee Schedule shall be included as Appendix A of the City Code and shall replace those fees adopted Dec. 5, 2022, by Ordinance No. 2638-21 for the calendar year 2023 which is hereby rescinded. *See attached PDF for Appendix A of the fee schedule* Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect Jan. 1, 2024. First Reading October 2, 2023 Second Reading October 16, 2023 Date of Publication October 26, 2023 Date Ordinance takes effect January 1, 2024 Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5e) Page 3 Title: Second reading and adopt ordinance establishing fees for 2024 Summary for publication Ordinance No. _____-22 An ordinance adopting fees called for by ordinance for calendar year 2024 This ordinance sets 2024 fees as outlined in Appendix A of the City Code of Ordinances. The fee ordinance is modified to reflect the cost of providing services and is completed each year to determine what, if any, fees require adjustment. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2024. Adopted by the City Council October 16, 2023 Jake Spano /s/ mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: October 26, 2023 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Consent agenda item:5f Executive summary Title: Amending resolution authorizing special assessment to abate unsafe conditions of hazardous building – Ward 3 Recommended action: Motion to amend resolution establishing a special assessment for the abatement of unsafe conditions for human occupancy of the hazardous building located at 3056 Edgewood Ave S. St. Louis Park, MN 55426. Policy consideration: This action is consistent with Section 108.1.3 Structure unfit for human occupancy under the 2012 IPMC adopted under city ordinance Sec. 6-142. Code adopted. The proposed action is consistent with the special assessment policy previously established by the city council. Summary: The property at 3056 Edgewood Ave S. recently underwent maintenance work to address outside storage, junk vehicle and an interior clean-out to remove an excessive number of items restricting egress throughout the home and severely limiting the use of the cooking and bathroom facilities as well as the sleeping areas. On January 18, 2023, the property owners signed a special assessment agreement to include the cost of the maintenance work $17,432.22 and a city administrative Fee $150, for a total of $17,582.22. On February 21, 2023, council approved the special assessment and the maintenance work was completed on September 25, 2023 with an actual cost of $11,690.79 and a city administrative fee $150 for a total of $11,840.79. The previous special assessment amount has not yet been assessed against the subject property. The revised agreement will need to be approved by October 31, 2023 in order to meet certification deadlines. The terms of the agreement will remain the same with a ten-year term at an interest rate of 5.027%. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, building and energy director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Choose an item. meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5e) Page 2 Title: Amending resolution authorizing special assessment to abate unsafe conditions of hazardous building – Ward 3 Resolution No. 23-___ Resolution authorizing special assessment of maintenance work at 3056 Edgewood Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 PID No. 17-117-21-11-0042 WHEREAS, Christopher Woida and Michelle Woida, the property owners at 3056 Edgewood Avenue South, shall permit the city and its agents to enter the subject property and perform the maintenance work to bring the property into compliance with city code; and WHEREAS, the property owner has agreed to waive their right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the city council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the property maintenance Inspector related to conditions of the property. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The property owners shall permit the city and its agents to enter the subject property and perform the maintenance work to bring the property into compliance with city code. Property owners agree that the city may, at its sole discretion, discard any refuse or debris as necessary to complete the maintenance work. 2. The property owners and their successors and assigns hereby consent to the entry onto the subject property by the city and its successors and assigns, including any contractor hired for the purpose of completing the maintenance work. The property owners further consent to the city and its successors and assigns discarding any refuse or debris as necessary to complete the maintenance work, and hereby waive any and all right to such property. 3. The total revised cost for the maintenance work is accepted at $11,690.79. 4. An administrative fee of $150.00 for processing shall be added to the special assessment funds. 5. The total special assessment against the property will be $11840.79. 6. The property owners have agreed to waive their rights to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, city charter, the constitution, or common law. 7. The property owners agree to pay the city for the cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 5.027% Choose an item. meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5e) Page 3 Title: Amending resolution authorizing special assessment to abate unsafe conditions of hazardous building – Ward 3 8. The property owners agree to execute an agreement with the city and any other documents necessary to implement the maintenance work and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Consent agenda item: 5g Executive summary Title: Statutory tort limits for liability insurance Recommended action: Motion to adopt resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance. Policy consideration: Not applicable Summary: Each year the council is required to pass a resolution indicating if they wish to waive or not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability insurance established by Minnesota Statute 466.04. The statutory liability limits for claims that occur after July 1, 2009 are $500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence. The city council must review and make an election of one of the following three options: •Not to waive the statutory tort limits (staff recommendation) •Waive the limits and not purchase excess liability coverage. •Waive the limits and purchase excess liability coverage. The three options are explained in more detail in the background section of this report. Financial or budget considerations: The city will continue to maintain liability insurance coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust in the amount required by State Statute, and the required annual motion will be in place in preparation for the new policy year. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Amelia Cruver, finance director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5g) Page 2 Title: Statutory tort limits for liability insurance Discussion Background: The three options the city council has are detailed below. The city’s practice has been option 1, to not waive the statutory tort limits. Staff recommends the council continue with this practice. Option 1 (recommended) If the city elects not to waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence would be limited to $1,500,000. Option 2 If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $2,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $2,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. Option 3 If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. The City of St. Louis Park in the past has elected to not waive the statutory tort limits and has not purchased excess liability coverage. Staff recommends continuing this practice and not to waive the statutory limits. The following resolution allows the statutory tort limits to remain in place until the council changes this election. Staff will ask council to consider this question annually as required by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 5g) Page 3 Title: Statutory tort limits for liability insurance Resolution No. 23-____ Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance Whereas, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has requested the City to make an election with regard to waiving or not waiving its tort liability established by Minnesota Statute 466.04; and Whereas, the choices available are to not waive the statutory limit, to waive the limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, or to waive the limit and to add additional insurance coverage; Now therefore be it resolved that the St. Louis Park City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statute 466.04 and that such election is effective until amended by further resolution of the St. Louis Park City Council. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6a Executive summary Title: Resolution approving assessment of delinquent charges Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, solicit comments, and close the public hearing. Motion to adopt Resolution to assess delinquent water, sewer, storm water, refuse, abatement of tree removals, false alarms, mowing, and citation charges against the benefiting property. Policy consideration: Does the city council desire to collect outstanding fees and charges through the special assessment process? Summary: The city certifies delinquent balances to Hennepin County as a means to collect on these accounts. The certification is done via the special assessment process and becomes a lien on the individual properties that is due over the next year or several years, depending upon the type of charge. Delinquent accounts relate to charges for water, sewer, storm water, refuse, abatement of tree removals, tree pruning, false alarms, mowing and citations against the benefiting property. To help mitigate the number of accounts that get certified, city staff work with residents and businesses during the certification process and throughout the year to resolve their outstanding balances by sending notices, answering questions outstanding account balances and providing information to residents on where they can find energy assistance payment programs to help reduce the balance of their delinquent account. In recognition of equity concerns, St. Louis Park finance staff does significant work analyzing data trends, answering questions and providing connections to financial resources. Additionally, the city certifies and assesses delinquent bills as an alternative to shutting of water service for accounts that go unpaid. Information on the 2023 certification process is provided in the following discussion. Financial or budget considerations: Collection of these charges is vital to the financial stability of the city’s utility systems and to reimburse the city for expenses incurred in providing services. The certification process is also how the city is able to collect on delinquent account receivable balances for services provided to specific properties, including mowing service, tree removal service, false alarms, citations and other services. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution levying assessment Prepared by: Kaitlyn Finkel, accountant Reviewed by: Amelia Cruver, finance director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6a) Page 2 Title: Assessment of delinquent charges Discussion Background: Each of the customers involved in the certification process received a city service. Subsequently, the customers were then billed through one of our regular billing processes. The invoice(s) is/are now past due, and the recommended method of collecting the past due amounts is through certification as a special assessment to the property for the next year or several years taxes, depending on the type of delinquency. In advance of the public hearing date, individual letters were mailed to property owners advising them of the pending assessment and their right to be heard before the city council. Per council policy, all delinquent utility accounts have been assessed with a $15 administrative fee. This fee is not included in the 2023 amount below to provide consistent comparative data. The table below shows comparison data from 2019 - 2023 in relation to the number of delinquent accounts or invoices that received certification letters, and the total value of the delinquent amounts. The number of “other delinquent balances” continued to increase significantly this year. This was due to an increase in the population of emerald ash borer beetles, which resulted in a larger number of private-tree removals than in previous years. Year Delinquent Utility Accounts Other Delinquent Invoices Beginning Delinquent Utility Balances Other Beginning Delinquent Balances Total Beginning Delinquent Balances Total Final Certification Amounts 2023 1,260 279 $957,779 $267,123 $1,224,902 TBD 2022 1,259 190 $887,254 $130,519 $1,017,774 $457,384 2021 1,288 114 $816,840 $33,676 $850,517 $450,046 2020 1,216 108 $714,136 $42,717 $756,853 $457,411 2019 1,481 179 $902,448 $44,283 $946,731 $457,112 Each year, many residents and businesses pay their delinquent amount(s) before the certification deadline, thereby reducing the final amount certified and sent to Hennepin County. From the time the letters are sent out in September until the certification process is completed, there are several hundred property owners who contact the City with questions about their outstanding balance(s) and the certification process. At the close of business day on Oct. 10, 2023, the remaining delinquent balance for utilities was $758,393, and the remaining delinquent balances owed for other charges was $231,922, for a total outstanding amount of $990,315. This year, in an effort to improve collection rates, staff also expanded attempts to contact property owners about their delinquent accounts by cross-referencing the customer data in our billing system with the owner-data held in the county’s property information system and sending duplicate letters to any new address we did not already have on file. More specific data about the collection trends for utility accounts is represented in the table below. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6a) Page 3 Title: Assessment of delinquent charges Year Start Mid-Process End Cert Totals Accts Balance Cert Totals Accts Balance % Collected Accts Balance Cert Totals Accts Balance % Collected Prior to Cert Accts Balance 2023 1260 $957,779 858 $758,393 32% 21% TBD TBD TBD TBD 2022 1259 $887,254 740 $604,599 41% 32% 486 $406,451 61% 54% 2021 1288 $816,840 794 $570,512 38% 30% 533 $407,562 59% 50% 2020 1216 $714,136 870 $605,164 28% 15% 543 $416,524 55% 42% 2019 1481 $902,448 823 $589,720 44% 35% 539 $483,902 64% 46% The amounts shown above do not include any added fees or interest. Of the 486 accounts certified last year, 332 are also delinquent this year. Customers have until Nov. 16, 2023, at 4:30 p.m. to pay their delinquent amount. A copy of the assessment roll is on file with the City Clerk’s office for review. Starting this year, in an effort to help residents find assistance for paying their delinquent utility balances, staff added information directly to the utility certification letters that each resident received on a resource that provides utility payment assistance to low-income households. Staff plotted the parcels on a map of the city to see if there were any trends related to certification based on geographical location in the city. Staff found that, geographically, certification properties appear to be evenly disbursed. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6a) Page 4 Title: Assessment of delinquent charges Next steps: After conducting the public hearing, the city council will take action by passing a resolution to direct the assessment of delinquent water, sewer, storm water, refuse, abatement of tree removals, false alarms, mowing and citations against the benefiting property. Staff will continue to collect payments related to the delinquent accounts and work with residents to resolve issues related to their delinquent accounts. All delinquent accounts outstanding as of Nov. 16, 2023 at 4:30 p.m. will be certified to Hennepin County for collection as part of the owner’s property tax bill. Upon certification, the delinquent amounts will become a lien on the individual properties. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6a) Page 5 Title: Assessment of delinquent charges Resolution No. 23-____ Resolution levying assessment for delinquent utility accounts, tree removals, false alarms, mowing and citations Whereas, the city council has heretofore determined by resolution or ordinance the rates and charges for water, sewer, storm water and refuse services of the city and has provided for the abatement of tree removals, false alarms, mowing, and citations to a home or business shall be at the expense of the owners of the premises involved; and Whereas, all such sums become delinquent and assessable against the property served under Section 18-153, Section 18-154, Section 22-37, Section 32-34, Section 34-52, Section 34- 56, Section 32-97, Section 32-153, Section 34-111, and Section 34-112, of the St. Louis Park City Code and Minnesota Statutes Sections 415.01, 366.011, 366.012, 429.061, 429.101, 443.015, 410.33, and 444.075; and Whereas, Finance has prepared a list of unpaid charges to be certified against each tract or parcel of land served by utilities, or against which tree removals, false alarms, mowing and citations remain unpaid at the close of business on Nov. 16, 2023; and Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that said assessment rolls are hereby adopted and approved, there is hereby levied and assessed against each and every tract of land described therein an assessment in the amounts respectively therein, and the City Clerk is hereby authorized to deliver said assessment roll for amounts unpaid at the close of business on Nov. 16, 2023, to the Auditor of Hennepin County for collection of the assessment in the same manner as other municipal taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced with interest from the date of this resolution at the rate of 4.93% percent per annum; and It is further resolved that said unpaid charges are hereby certified to the Auditor of Hennepin County, and the Chief Financial Officer is hereby authorized to deliver said list of unpaid charges to the Auditor of Hennepin County, for collection in the same manner as other municipal taxes are collected and payment thereof enforced with interest from the date of this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council October 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6b.1 Executive summary Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution setting the 2024 Special Service District (SSD) No. 1 budget and property owner service charges, accepting a contribution from Parkshores Senior Campus, and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to approve Special Service District No. 1 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2024 proposed budgets and service charges have been adjusted to include a 5% increase. Staff have provided public notice and a direct mailing to property owners in SSD No. 1, regarding the 2024 budget and service charges. The proposed 2024 budget/services charges and locations are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: The parks maintenance budget will incur a service charge for the city-owned property located within this district at 3700 Monterey Drive (Recreation Center/Wolfe Park). The proposed service charge for 2024 is $29,728. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Attachments A) Budget B) Service charges C) Map Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Cynthia S. Walsh, deputy city manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.1) Page 2 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Discussion Background: On October 17, 2016, the city council approved a resolution imposing a multi-year service charge for Special Service District No. 1 (this district is located along Excelsior Boulevard from Quentin Avenue to Highway 100 and along Park Center Boulevard and Monterey Drive). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The notice of this public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 21 and Oct. 6, 2023. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 1 Financial Position Special Service District No. 1 has an anticipated 2023 year-end fund balance of approximately negative $59,074. Proposed 2024 Budget and Service Charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following: • 2024 budget and service charge amount of $112,005; an increase of 5% from 2023. • An annual contribution of $1,993 from Parkshores Senior Campus, LLC, in recognition of the benefits received as a residential property located within the service district. Present considerations: Special Service Districts are a benefit to businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: • In November, the city certifies the 2024 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.1) Page 3 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Resolution No. 23-___ 2024 Budget & Service Charges for Special Service District No. 1 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2067-96, the city council created Special Service District No. 1 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 16-130, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2026 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 16-130, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 16-130, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2023. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2024 Budget for Special Service District No. 1 of $112,005 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 1 property owners. 2. The authorized 2023 service charge for Special Service District No. 1 is $112,005 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. 3. An annual contribution of $1,933 will be accepted from Parkshores Senior Campus, LLC, in recognition of the benefits received as a residential property located within the service district. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council Oct. 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #1 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2024 Adopted Budget 2023 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES $250 $238 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS $525 $500 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS $6,195 $5,900 6303 - OTHER $315 $300 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements $2,625 $2,500 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services $4,725 $4,500 6550 - Civil 750 - Civil $158 $150 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - snow removal 772 - SSD - snow removal $45,150 $43,000 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal $1,050 $1,000 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services $3,150 $3,000 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint $8,400 $8,000 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services $32,550 $31,000 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES $105 $100 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE $141 $134 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal $4,200 $4,000 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE $2,468 $2,350 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $112,006 $106,672 SSD#1 Budget City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.1) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #1 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2024 Service Charges PROPOSED ACTUAL 2024 2023 LINE PID SERVICE SERVICE NO.NO.OWNER BUSINESS CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-33-0019 3601 Park Center Boulevard Bel Verge LLC Bel Verge LLC $3,849 $3,740 2 06-028-24-33-0015 3601 State Hwy No 100 South Target Corporation T-0260 Target Corporation $12,077 $11,627 3 06-028-24-34-0022 3700 Monterey Drive City of St. Louis Park City of St. Louis Park $29,728 $27,925 4 06-028-24-33-0014 3777 Park Center Boulevard Bermer Corp Lund Food Holdings $12,353 $11,799 6 07-028-24-22-0031 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $8,145 $7,516 7 07-028-24-22-0035 3900 Park Nicollet Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $6,421 $6,105 8 07-028-24-21-0004 4916 Excelsior Boulevard Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Health Services $1,904 $1,873 9 07-028-24-21-0005 4920 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Medical Center Park Nicollet Health Services $546 $525 10 07-028-24-21-0006 4950 Excelsior Boulevard Zip Printing Zip Printing $634 $619 11 07-028-24-21-0512 4951 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $1,712 $1,660 12 07-028-24-21-0513 4959 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments Properties Inc Miracle Mile $1,508 $1,429 13 07-028-24-22-0023 4961 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments Properties Inc Miracle Mile $704 $674 14 07-028-24-22-0024 4995 Excelsior Boulevard Corrigan Properties Inc Miracle Mile $933 $887 15 07-028-24-22-0032 5000 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $670 $649 16 07-028-24-22-0025 5001 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments Properties Inc Miracle Mile $665 $637 17 07-028-24-22-0033 5050 Excelsior Boulevard Methodist Hospital Park Nicollet Health Services $3,928 $3,746 18 07-028-24-22-0034 5100 Excelsior Boulevard PNMC Holdings Park Nicollet Health Services $1,678 $1,586 19 07-028-24-22-0037 5200 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Place Ltd Liability Co.Frauenshuh Co.$1,890 $1,829 20 07-028-24-22-0026 5201 Excelsior Boulevard Corrigan Properties Inc Miracle Mile $9,669 $9,297 21 07-028-24-22-0036 5300 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Place LTD Liability Co Frauenshuh Co.$6,827 $6,597 22 07-028-24-22-0004 5400 Auto Club Way AAA AAA Minneapolis $6,165 $5,952 $112,005 $106,672 Notes: 1)The proposed 2024 budget is $112,005. 2)For 2024, the service charges increase by 5%. 3)The proposed 2024 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. a) Commercial sidewalk snow removal charges are on a front footage basis. b) All other services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. ADDRESS City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.1) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Page 5 AAHen '" Special Serv ice District No.1 West 36th Street,Park C enter Boulevard,and Excelsior Boulevard --36THSTW - \ I I•7 ----- 1 ~<\.s ---~-\ #tir[.I--+--{ DuzrOjjj ~ \ -Streetscape area covered by SSD 1CJPropertieswithinssD1 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.1) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Page 6 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6b.2 Executive summary Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution setting the 2024 Special Service District (SSD) No. 2 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to approve Special Service District No. 2 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2024 proposed budgets and service charges have been adjusted to include a 5% increase. Staff have provided public notice and a direct mailing to property owners in SSD No. 2, regarding the 2024 budget and service charges. The proposed 2024 budget/services charges and locations are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: The public works operations division budget will incur a service charge for the city-owned property located within this district at 3929 Excelsior Boulevard (bus shelter). The proposed service charge for 2024 is $55. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Attachments A) Budget B) Service charges C) Map Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Cynthia S. Walsh, deputy city manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.2) Page 2 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Discussion Background: On October 1, 2018, the city council approved a resolution imposing a multi-year service charge for Special Service District No. 2 (this district is located along Excelsior Boulevard from Monterey Drive/38th Street to France Avenue). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District property owners approved the proposed 2023 budget and service charge. The notice of this public hearing, was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 21 and Oct. 6, 2023. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 2 financial position Special Service District No. 2 has an anticipated 2022 year-end fund balance of approximately $51,407. Proposed 2024 budget and service charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following: •2024 budget and service charge amount of $49,828; an increase of 5% from 2023. Present considerations: Special Service Districts are a benefit to businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: •In November, the city certifies the 2024 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.2) Page 3 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Resolution No. 23-___ 2024 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2093-97, the city council created Special Service District No. 2 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 18-147, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2028 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 18-147, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 18-147, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2023. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1.The 2024 Budget for Special Service District No. 2 of $49,828 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 2 property owners. 2.The authorized 2024 service charge for Special Service District No. 1 is $49,828 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council Oct. 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #2 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2024 Adopted Budget 2023 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 213.00 204.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 210.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 3,150.00 3,000.00 6303 - OTHER 1,050.00 1,000.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 520.00 500.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,100.00 2,000.00 6550 - Civil 750 - Civil 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD Site Maintenance 773 - SSD Site Maintenance 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 840.00 800.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 4,200.00 4,000.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 9,870.00 9,400.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 24,150.00 23,000.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 60.00 58.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,050.00 1,000.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,415.00 2,300.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 49,828.00 47,462.00 SSD#2 Budget City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.2) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #2 Attachment B Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2024 Service Charges PROPOSED ACTUAL 2024 2023 LINE SERVICE SERVICE NO.PID NO.OWNER Business name CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-41-0075 3900 Excelsior Blvd MFREVF III - Ellipse, LLC MFREVF III - Ellipse LLC $7,970 $7,592 2 06-028-24-41-0077 3901 Excelsior Blvd Alberto Properties LLP Alberto Properties LLP $2,355 $2,243 3 06-028-24-41-0076 3924 Excelsior Blvd MFREVF III - Ellipse, LLC MFREVF III - Ellipse LLC $2,865 $2,729 4 06-028-24-41-0068 3925 Excelsior Blvd Patricia J Fitzgerald A & A Agency Inc $924 $880 6 06-028-24-41-0067 3929 Excelsior Blvd City of St. Louis Park City of St Louis Park $55 $52 7 06-028-24-41-0014 3939 Excelsior Blvd Sara Son LLC Sara Son LLC $1,341 $1,277 8 06-028-24-41-0070 3947 Excelsior Blvd Wallack Properties LLC Wallack Properties LLC $2,254 $2,147 9 06-028-24-41-0008 4100 Excelsior Blvd Sela Roofing & Remodeling Sela Roofing & Remodeling $1,632 $1,554 10 06-028-24-41-0009 4120 Excelsior Blvd Altus Business Development Properties Altus Business Development Properties $1,595 $1,519 11 06-028-24-44-0001 4140 Excelsior Blvd Larson Enterprises/Slumberland Larson Enterprises $2,759 $2,628 12 06-028-24-44-0176 4170 Excelsior Blvd 4150 Excelsior Blvd. Partnership - Richard Stranik Rack Attack $2,096 $1,996 13 06-028-24-44-0175 4200 Excelsior Blvd Stranik Brothers R/E LLC DBA Midas St. Paul $1,785 $1,701 14 06-028-24-44-0173 4201 Excelsior Blvd AMF Properties LLC/Life Medical AMF Properties LLC/Life Medical $2,679 $2,552 15 06-028-24-44-0088 4221 Excelsior Blvd Prima Investments LLC Prima Investments LLC $377 $359 16 06-028-24-43-0017 4300 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments, LLC c/o Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc Poobah Investments LLC $782 $745 17 06-028-24-43-0020 4301 Excelsior Blvd S & S Investments S & S Investments $1,647 $1,569 18 06-028-24-43-0018 4306 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments, LLC c/o Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc Poobah Investments LLC $599 $571 19 06-028-24-43-0019 4308 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments, LLC c/o Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc Poobah Investments LLC $799 $761 20 06-028-24-43-0021 4317 Excelsior Blvd 4317 Holdings LLC Habitation Furnishing & Design $995 $948 21 06-028-24-43-0186 4320 Excelsior Blvd Poobah Investments, LLC c/o Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc Poobah Investments LLC $2,456 $2,340 22 06-028-24-43-0091 4331 Excelsior Blvd David P Johnson Living Trust Bell Nelson Furniture $1,353 $1,289 23 06-028-24-43-0392 4400 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bancshares Inc Bridgewater Bank $5,653 $5,384 24 06-028-24-43-0040 4409 Excelsior Blvd Samfar Real Estate Inc Samfar Real Estate Inc $943 $898 25 06-028-24-43-0041 4415 Excelsior Blvd Automotive Accessories LLC Automotive Accessories LLC $777 $740 26 06-028-24-43-0042 4419 Excelsior Blvd Celine Properties LLC Celine Properties LLC $1,711 $1,630 27 06-028-24-43-0391 4450 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bank Bridgewater Bank $1,426 $1,358 $49,828 $47,462 Notes: 1)The proposed 2024 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. 2)All services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. ADDRESS City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.2) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Page 5 Special Service District No.2 ATTACH#ex "" Excelsior Boulevard O----z +e-.hood - I I .;.- - H 38TH STW Dz::ia.z /'~ + +r TTrr\ I I I I.II Ii! 0w?zz ·-1 l-='l36 1/2 srw 1 -Streetscape area covered by SSD 2 LJ Properties within SSD 2 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.2) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Page 6 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6b.3 Executive summary Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges and ten-year extension for Special Service District No. 3 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution setting the 2024 Special Service District (SSD) No. 3 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to approve Special Service District No. 3 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2024 proposed budgets and service charges have been adjusted to include a 5% increase. Staff have provided public notice and a direct mailing to property owners in SSD No. 3, regarding the 2024 budget and service charges. The proposed 2024 budget/services charges and locations are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: None. There are no city owned properties within this district. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Attachments A) Budget B) Service charges C) Map Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Cynthia S. Walsh, deputy city manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.3) Page 2 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges and ten-year extension for Special Service District No. 3 Discussion Background: On October 17, 2022, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 3 (located along Excelsior Boulevard from Quentin Avenue to Monterey Drive/W. 38th Street). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The notice of this public hearing, was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 21 and Oct. 6, 2023. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 3 financial position Special Service District No. 3 has an anticipated 2023 year-end fund balance of approximately $46,965. Proposed 2024 budget and service charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following: •2024 budget and service charge amount of $54,176; an increase of 5% from 2023. Present considerations: Special Service Districts are a benefit to the businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: •In November, the city certifies the 2024 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.3) Page 3 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges and ten-year extension for Special Service District No. 3 Resolution No. 23-___ 2024 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 3 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2224-02, the city council created Special Service District No. 3 (the “District”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 12-149, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2032 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 12-149, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 12-149, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2023. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1.The 2024 budget for Special Service District No. 3 of $54,176 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 3 property owners. 2.The authorized 2024 service charge for Special Service District No. 3 is $54,176 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council Oct 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #3 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2024 Adopted Budget 2023 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 451.00 430.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 210.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 3,675.00 3,500.00 6303 - OTHER 1,575.00 1,500.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 525.00 500.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,625.00 2,500.00 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 6630 - SSD - snow removal 772 - SSD - snow removal 18,900.00 18,000.00 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 630.00 600.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,625.00 2,500.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 7,350.00 7,000.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 12,600.00 12,000.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 70.00 67.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,785.00 1,700.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,155.00 1,100.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 54,176.00 51,597.00 SSD #3 Budget City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.3) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges and ten-year extension for Special Service District No. 3 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #3 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2024 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2024 2023 LINE NO.PID No.Address Business Owner Service Charge Service Charge 1 06-028-24-43-0191 4500 Exc Blvd CS McCrossan Inc Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $4,672 $4,513 2 07-028-24-12-0047 4501 Exc Blvd S & D Cleaners Laurel Properties LLC $1,249 $1,181 3 07-028-24-12-0048 4509 Exc Blvd Lang Nelson Office Park Boulevard LLP $2,223 $2,101 4 06-028-24-43-0192 4590 Exc Blvd CS McCrossan Inc Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $960 $927 6 07-028-24-12-0049 4601 Exc Blvd Park Blvd Office Bldg Park Boulevard LLP $3,117 $2,967 7 07-028-24-12-0050 4611 Exc Blvd Dilly Lilly 4611 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,504 $1,431 8 07-028-24-12-0051 4615 Exc Blvd Judith McGrann & Friends Pie in the Sky Properties, LLC $1,297 $1,236 9 07-028-24-12-0052 4617 Exc Blvd Flower Fair 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,691 $1,610 10 07-028-24-12-0175 4630 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand Apts LLC $7,683 $7,299 11 07-028-24-21-0009 4631 Exc Blvd Jennings Liquor 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,725 $1,644 12 07-028-24-21-0011 4701 Exc Blvd Steve's Park Amoco Mason Properties LLC $2,771 $2,618 13 07-028-24-21-0012 4725 Exc Blvd Excelsior Office Bldg Excelsior Investments LLC $3,614 $3,431 14 07-028-24-21-0256 4730 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand Apts LLC $8,969 $8,526 15 07-028-24-21-0514 4800 Exc Blvd Fresh Thyme Grocery 4800 Excelsior Apts $5,351 $5,134 16 07-028-24-21-0252 4801 Exc Blvd Loffhagen Insurance Bird Dog Properties LLC $1,710 $1,628 17 07-028-24-21-0015 4811 Exc Blvd Latitudes/Laundramat Fine Brothers $1,555 $1,473 18 07-028-24-21-0016 4821 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Poperties LLC $846 $805 19 07-028-24-21-0017 4825 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Poperties LLC $843 $802 20 07-028-24-21-0031 4901 Exc Blvd Checks II DMM Holdings $876 $829 21 07-028-24-21-0032 4907 Exc Blvd Vogue Furniture 4907 Excelsior LLC $760 $719 22 07-028-24-21-0033 4911 Exc Blvd Old World Antiques MKT Property LLC $760 $723 Total $54,176 $51,597 Notes: 1)The proposed 2024 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.3) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges and ten-year extension for Special Service District No. 3 Page 5 Special Service District No.3 ]T e n " Excelsior Boulevard -Streetscape area covered by SS D 3DPropertieswithinSSD3 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.3) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges and ten-year extension for Special Service District No. 3 Page 6 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6b.4 Executive summary Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution setting the 2024 Special Service District (SSD) No. 4 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to approve Special Service District No. 4 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2024 proposed budgets and service charges have been adjusted to include a 5% increase. Staff have provided public notice and a direct mailing to property owners in SSD No. 4, regarding the 2024 budget and service charges. The proposed 2024 budget/services charges and locations are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: None. There are no city owned properties within this district. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Attachments A) Budget B) Service charges C) Map Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Cynthia S. Walsh, deputy city manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.4) Page 2 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Discussion Background: On October 5, 2015, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 4 (located along Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100 to Louisiana Avenue). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The notice of this public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 21 and Oct. 6, 2023. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 4 financial position Special Service District No. 4 has an anticipated 2023 year-end fund balance of approximately $22,792. Proposed 2024 budget and service charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following: •2024 budget and service charge amount of $28,281; an increase of 5% from 2023. Present considerations: Special Service Districts are a benefit to the businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: •In November, the city certifies the 2024 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.4) Page 3 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Resolution No. 23-___ 2024 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2298-05, the city council created Special Service District No. 4 (the “district”). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment “B” attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 15-148, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2025 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 2 of Resolution No. 15-148, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul Metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 15-148, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2023. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1.The 2023 budget for Special Service District No. 4 of $28,281 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 4 property owners. 2.The authorized 2023 service charge for Special Service District No. 4 is $28,281 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment “B” attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council Oct. 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Kim Keller, city clerk Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #4 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2024 Adopted Budget 2023 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 159.00 152.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 210.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,100.00 2,000.00 6303 - OTHER 525.00 500.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 525.00 500.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 1,312.50 1,250.00 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 525.00 500.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,675.00 3,500.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 3,150.00 3,000.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 11,550.00 11,000.00 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES 105.00 100.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 34.50 33.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,890.00 1,800.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,520.00 2,400.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 28,281.00 26,935.00 SSD #4 Budget City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.4) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #4 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2024 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2024 2023 PAR Service Service NO.PID #Owner Business Charge Charge 1 21-117-21-24-0019 5600 Excelsior Blvd Coco Investments Finished Basement Company $1,058 $1,007 2 21-117-21-24-0202 5608 Excelsior Blvd Helmut Mauer Auto Surf Café $802 $764 3 21-117-21-24-0141 5707 Excelsior Blvd Len Paul/Gene Pretty Good LLC c/o New Concepts Management GroupNew Concepts Mgt Group $1,076 $1,025 4 21-117-21-24-0193 5717 Excelsior Blvd LMC INC LMC Inc.$930 $886 5 21-117-21-24-0040 5720 Excelsior Blvd Holiday Stationstores Inc Holiday Stationstores, Inc.$1,161 $1,105 6 21-117-21-24-0161 5801 Excelsior Blvd Premier RE, LLC Premier RE LLC $535 $509 7 21-117-21-24-0066 5804 Excelsior Blvd Lelich Properties LLC Lelich Properties LLC $657 $626 8 21-117-21-24-0210 5809 Excelsior Blvd C.B.S. Real Est Ptnr II LLP C B S Real Est Ptrn II LLP $526 $501 9 21-117-21-24-0067 5810 Excelsior Blvd 5812 Excelsior Blvd Co LLC 5812 Excelsior Blvd Co LLC $754 $718 11 21-117-21-24-0185 5825 Excelsior Blvd Kil-Ben Excelsior, LLC Kil-Ben Excelsior LLC $1,384 $1,318 12 21-117-21-24-0083 5900 Excelsior Blvd Realty Income Properties3, LLC Realty Income Props 3 LLC $939 $895 13 21-117-21-23-0156 5916 Excelsior Blvd Rackner & Rackner Rackner and Rackner/Bunny's $1,050 $1,000 14 21-117-21-23-0010 5922 Excelsior Blvd 5922 Building LLC Frederick & Rosen Ltd $193 $184 15 21-117-21-24-0195 5925 Excelsior Blvd DYS Properties Suntide Commercial Realty $1,435 $1,366 16 21-117-21-23-0011 5930 Excelsior Blvd Leonard C Riley Trust Northern Aire Pools $361 $344 17 21-117-21-23-0097 6001 Excelsior Blvd Sew What Corporation The Wicker Shop $511 $487 18 21-117-21-23-0127 6002 Excelsior Blvd Seneca Holdings LLC Fitrz Inc $577 $549 19 21-117-21-23-0128 6006 Excelsior Blvd Four Four Time LLC RRK LLC $297 $283 20 21-117-21-23-0100 6011 Excelsior Blvd Kathleen Hames Arts & Flowers $1,135 $1,081 21 21-117-21-23-0155 6100 Excelsior Blvd Lion Properties LLC ReMAXX/King Tooth $399 $380 22 21-117-21-32-0006 6111 Excelsior Blvd Excelsior 6111, LLC 6111 Excelsior LLC $1,093 $1,040 23 21-117-21-23-0130 6112 Excelsior Blvd Snyder Electric Co.Snyder Electric Co $596 $568 24 21-117-21-32-0021 6121 Excelsior Blvd Flannery Lucey Props I LLC Hung LLC $640 $610 25 21-117-21-32-0022 6127 Excelsior Blvd TRW Capital Management Inc White Family Dentistry $431 $411 26 6200 6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd $3,030 $2,886 27 20-117-21-14-0026 6500 Excelsior Blvd Park Nicollet Health Services/Methodist Hospital Asbury Methodist Hospital $2,091 $1,991 28 20-117-21-41-0009 6600 Excelsior Blvd Park Nicollet Health Services/Methodist Hospital Methodist Hospital $3,787 $3,607 29 City Municipal Parking Lot City of St. Louis Park $833 $794 $28,281 $26,935 Address City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.4) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Page 5 **6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd Charges 2024 2023 21-117-21-32-0133 6200 Excelsior Blvd 101 TRW Capital Management Inc.Ward Law Offices LTD $177 $168 21-117-21-32-0134 6200 Excelsior Blvd 102 Charles and Janice Woodson Farmers Insurance Group $184 $175 21-117-21-32-0135 6200 Excelsior Blvd 103 Meridian Residentila Mtg Inc Midwest Construction $178 $170 21-117-21-32-0136 6200 Excelsior Blvd 104 DAFI Properties LLC American Family Insurance $201 $191 21-117-21-32-0137 6200 Excelsior Blvd 201 Dennis Schlutter Chiropractic Center $171 $162 21-117-21-32-0138 6200 Excelsior Blvd 202 Lois Cochrane Schlutter $180 $171 21-117-21-32-0139 6200 Excelsior Blvd 203 Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC $234 $223 21-117-21-32-0140 6200 Excelsior Blvd 204 Lois Cochrane Schlutter Schlutter Brookside Prop LLC $207 $197 21-117-21-32-0141 6250 Excelsior Blvd 101 Nemer Fieger & Assoc Inc Nemer Fieger & Associates $189 $180 21-117-21-32-0142 6250 Excelsior Blvd 102 Fia Real Estate LLC LGH Properties LLC $175 $167 21-117-21-32-0143 6250 Excelsior Blvd 103 Impact Massage & Bodywork LLC E. Gordon Hoar & Associates $192 $183 21-117-21-32-0144 6250 Excelsior Blvd 104 RDK Holdings LLC Nemer Fieger & Associates $174 $165 21-117-21-32-0145 6250 Excelsior Blvd 201 James D Fieger Trustee Nemer Fieger & Associates $184 $175 21-117-21-32-0146 6250 Excelsior Blvd 202 Willy Skadsberg JR Skads Travel Service, Inc.$167 $160 21-117-21-32-0147 6250 Excelsior Blvd 203 James D Fieger Trustee Nemer Fieger & Associates $244 $232 21-117-21-32-0148 6250 Excelsior Blvd 204 Excelsior Blvd Office LLC Urista Properties LLC $174 $165 $3,031 $2,884 Notes **Denotes properties with a single street address but have sub-units that are independently owned. 1)The proposed 2024 budget is $28,281, as is the service charge. 2)The proposed 2024 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.4) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Page 6 Special Service District No.4 Excelsior Boulevard [At tpeT t t tC I • \ I I~, 0ca,LIz I I I 'I h,]o no I uJuz?sIOE-o nEzzI<I zLI>< rI » II ~ '::lI(:)o .-I I -Streetscape area covered by SSD 4CJPropertieswithinSSD4 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.4) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Page 7 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6b.5 Executive summary Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution setting the 2024 Special Service District No. 5 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to approve Special District No. 5 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2024 proposed budgets and service charges have been adjusted to include a 5% increase. Staff have provided public notice and a direct mailing to property owners in SSD No. 5, regarding the 2024 budget and service charges. The proposed 2024 budget/services charges and locations are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: None. There are no city owned properties within this district. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Attachments A) Budget B) Service charges C) Map Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Cynthia S. Walsh, deputy city manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.5) Page 2 Title: 2024 budget, service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Discussion Background: On February 2, 2009, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 5 (located along Park Place Boulevard between I-394 and Cedar Lake Road). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. In 2019 council approved a 10-year extension of the district. Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The notice of this public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 21 and Oct. 6, 2023. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 5 financial position Special Service District No. 5 has an anticipated 2023 year-end fund balance of approximately $39,185. Proposed 2024 budget and service charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following: •2024 budget and service charge amount of $34,287; an increase of 5% from 2023. Present considerations: Special Service Districts are a benefit to the businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: •In November, the city certifies the 2024 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.5) Page 3 Title: 2024 budget, service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Resolution No. 23-____ 2024 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2371-09, the city council created Special Service District No. 5 (the "District"). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment "B" attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 19-132, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2029 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 19-132, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 19-132, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2023. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2024 Budget for Special Service District No. 5 of $34,287 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 5 property owners. 2. The authorized 2023 service charge for Special Service District No. 5 is $34,287 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment "B" attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council Oct. 16, 2023. Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #5 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2024 Adopted Budget 2023 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 233.00 222.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 210.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 4,200.00 4,000.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 1,050.00 1,000.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 1,575.00 1,500.00 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0.00 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,680.00 1,600.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,150.00 3,000.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 3,150.00 3,000.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 15,855.00 15,100.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 34.00 33.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,575.00 1,500.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,575.00 1,500.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 34,287.00 32,655.00 SSD #5 Budget City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.5) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #5 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2024 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2024 2023 PID Address Owner Business Service Charge Service Charge 04-117-21-31-0019 1500 Park Place Blvd MLCV STLP LLC Doubletree Hotel $6,007 $5,721 30-029-24-33-0031 1600 West End Blvd MSP West End LLC Shoppes at West End $5,935 $5,652 04-117-21-34-0046 1620 Park Place Blvd PK Investment Associates LLC Roti & Leeann Chin $1,364 $1,299 04-117-21-34-0045 1650 Park Place Blvd PK Investment Associates LLC Inland Commerical $1,607 $1,530 04-117-21-34-0044 1690 Park Place Blvd Roselk LLC Arby's $1,209 $1,152 04-117-21-34-0049 1700 Park Place Blvd Costco Wholesale Corporation Fueling Station only $1,070 $1,019 30-029-24-32-0022 5320 16th St W MSP West End LLC ARC WEMPSMN001 LLC $2,395 $2,281 30-029-24-32-0026 5353 Wayzata Blvd MV Exchange & MV Exchange II LLCPark National Bank $2,467 $2,350 30-029-24-33-0011 5401 Gamble Dr BOF II MN W END OFF PK LLC Parkdale I - MEPC $4,313 $4,108 30-029-24-33-0015 5402 Parkdale Dr BOF II MN W END OFF PK LLC Parkdale II - MEPC $1,457 $1,388 04-117-21-34-0043 5600 Cedar Lake Rd PK Investment Associates LLC Office/Copy Max & Petsmart $2,777 $2,644 04-117-21-34-0050 5601 16th St W PK Investment Associates LLC Stormwater Pond $1,041 $991 04-117-21-31-0018 5657 Wayzata Blvd KK Corporation Park Place Restaurants $1,281 $1,220 04-117-21-34-0058 5699 16th St W PK Investment Associates LLC Lakeshore Learning Center $1,366 $1,301 Total:$34,287 $32,655 Notes: 1)The proposed 2024 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.5) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Page 5 Special Service District No.5 Arra4Men "c'' West End/Park Place Boulevard // ,s GA M B LE DR 'i / -Streetscape area covered by SSD 5DPropertieswithinSSD5 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.5) Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Page 6 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6b.6 Executive summary Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution setting the 2024 Special Service District No. 6 budget and property owner service charges directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to approve Special District No. 6 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2024 proposed budget remains the same as 2023. The proposed service charges have been adjusted to include a 5% increase. Staff have provided public notice and a direct mailing to property owners in SSD No. 6, regarding the 2024 budget and service charges. The proposed 2024 budget/services charges and locations are included as attachments. Financial or budget considerations: The TIF / Admin budget will incur a service charge for the city-owned undeveloped property located within this district. The proposed service charge for 2024 is $1,770. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Attachments A) Budget B) Service charges C) Map Prepared by: Kala Fisher, public services superintendent/deputy public works director Reviewed by: Emily Carr, assessment technician Cynthia S. Walsh, deputy city manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.6) Page 2 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Discussion Background: On June 15, 2009, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 6 (located along 36th Street W. from Wooddale Avenue to Highway 100). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. In 2019 council approved a 10-year extension of the district. Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The notice of this public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Sept. 21 and Oct. 6, 2023. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district.  Special Service District No. 6 financial position Special Service District No. 6 has an anticipated 2023 year-end fund balance of approximately $39,151. Proposed 2024 budget and service charges Following the public hearing, staff recommend approval of the following:  •2024 budget amount of $27,400; no change from 2023. •2024 service charge amount of $19,320; a 5% increase from 2023. Present considerations: Special Service Districts are a benefit to the businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor and attract customers to the area. Next steps: •In November, the city certifies the 2024 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.6) Page 3 Title: 2024 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Resolution No. 23-____ 2024 budget and service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Whereas, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2374-09, the city council created Special Service District No. 6 (the "District"). The specific properties located within the district are identified on attachment "B" attached hereto; and Whereas, pursuant to Resolution No. 19-133, the city council is authorized to impose service charges within the district on a multi-year basis through and including the year 2029 for taxes payable in said year; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 3 of Resolution No. 19-133, the maximum budget to be imposed in any year will be subject to adjustment calculations based on Consumer Price Index (CPI) data for the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area; and Whereas, pursuant to Section 4 of Resolution No. 19-133, the service charges shall be payable and collected at the same time and in the same manner as provided for payment and collection of ad valorem taxes; and Whereas, the city is required by statute to certify assessments to the County by December 1, 2023. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park as follows: 1. The 2023 Budget for Special Service District No. 6 of $27,400 is hereby approved as recommended by the Special Service District No. 6 property owners. 2. The authorized 2023 service charge for Special Service District No. 6 is $19,320 in the amounts and against the properties specified on attachment "B" attached to this resolution. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council Oct. 16, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #6 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2024 Adopted Budget 2023 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 217.00 217.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 500.00 500.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 5,000.00 5,000.00 6303 - OTHER 1,000.00 1,000.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,500.00 2,500.00 6630 - SSD Site Maintenance 773 - SSD Site Maintenance 500.00 500.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,500.00 2,500.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 11,000.00 11,000.00 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES 150.00 150.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 33.00 33.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 3,000.00 3,000.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,000.00 1,000.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,400.00 27,400.00 SSD #6 Budget City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.6) Title: 2024 budget and propertyy owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Page 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #6 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2024 Service Charges LINE Business Proposed Actual NO.2024 2023 PID Address Owner Service Charge Service Charge 1 16-117-21-34-0607 3601 Wooddale Ave Woodale Catered Lvg TowerLight Senior Living $3,344 $3,184 2 16-117-21-34-0015 5500 36th St. W.SLMB LLC SLMB LLC $429 $409 3 16-117-21-34-0355 5600 36th St W SLP Harmony Marketplace LLC SLP HARMONY MARKETPLACE LLC KAMI Inc $3,129 $2,980 4 16-117-21-34-0611 5605 36th St W 36th Street LLC 36th Street LLC $2,977 $2,835 6 16-117-21-34-0072 5701 36th St W Shirley Okrent Lerner Trust The Oliver Press $1,118 $1,064 7 16-117-21-34-0040 5708 36th St W Standal Properties Inc Standal Properties Inc.$1,770 $1,686 8 16-117-21-34-0071 5718 36th St W Shirley Okrent Lerner Trust The Oliver Press $590 $562 9 16-117-21-34-0077 5721 36th St W J Evan Properties LLC Thermetic Products $1,243 $1,184 10 16-117-21-34-0038 5724 36th St W 5724 West 36th Street LLC 5724 West 36th St LLC $590 $562 11 16-117-21-34-0046 5727 36th St W R & SA Investment LLC R & SA Investment LLC $590 $562 12 16-117-21-34-0068 5802 36th St W Standal Properties Inc Standal Properties Inc.$1,770 $1,686 13 16-117-21-31-0610 5950 36th St W City of St. Louis Park City of St Louis Park EDA $1,770 $1,686 Total $19,320 $18,400 Notes: 1)The proposed 2024 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. Attachment B City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.6) Title: 2024 budget and propertyy owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Page 5 Special Service District No.6 p«AHMENt ''' West 36th Street I I J .I.-- i I CAMERATA WAY II [ 35TH STW 0 LI Cl)z UJ LI ?E- ~ 5 I I I LID0>- 36 HSTW \ \ -Streetscape area covered by SS D 6 []P roe re s within SS D 6 City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6b.6) Title: 2024 budget and propertyy owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Page 6 Meeting: City council Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Public hearing: 6c Executive summary Title: Moratorium related to commercial cannabis activities Recommended action: Mayor to open public hearing, take comment, and close public hearing. Motion to approve first reading of an interim ordinance prohibiting the operation of cannabis Businesses. Policy consideration: Does council wish to temporarily prohibit the commercial manufacturing, distributing, selling of Cannabis and the operation of any cannabis business until local regulatory controls can be established? Summary: The Minnesota legislature recently legalized adult-use cannabis and permitting the operation of cannabis businesses and the sale of cannabis flower and cannabis products for public consumption. The law establishes a new state agency, the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM) to regulate the cannabis industry. The newly created OCM is not expected to begin issuing business licenses until January 1, 2025, and additional regulatory details are likely as state rule development has yet to occur. City zoning codes currently do not address where cannabis businesses may be located or prohibited. With business inquiries about potential sites already beginning, the city needs time to study and adopt appropriate ordinances. Additionally, the law allows for development of a local registration program for initial review of proposed cannabis businesses and ongoing compliance verification. An included provision of the law allows a city to adopt an interim ordinance establishing a moratorium, allowing a local regulatory framework to be established for ensuring public health, safety, and welfare in the community. Staff is recommending council adopt a moratorium related to the selling, testing, manufacturing and distributing of cannabis flower and cannabis products effective until January 1, 2025, or until the adoption of the controls being studied, whichever occurs first. The moratorium will not impact medical cannabis businesses, or the current lower-potency hemp edible retailers now licensed by the city. Next steps: If council approves first reading, the second reading is scheduled for November 6, 2023 with a planned effective date of December 1, 2023. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Ordinance Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, building and energy director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6c) Page 2 Title: Moratorium related to commercial cannabis activities Discussion Background: On August 1, 2023 the State of MN decriminalized possession, use, and home grow of cannabis for people 21 and older. In addition, Minn. Stat. ch. 34, creates a new agency, the Office of Cannabis Management (OCM), to regulate the sales of cannabis products. The OCM is planned to have sixteen license types related to the cannabis industry. Retail sales of cannabis, including lower potency hemp edibles, will require registration with the city, town or county in which the retail establishment is located. The OCM is not expected to begin licensing before January 1, 2025, however a local unit of government may not prohibit the establishment or operation of a cannabis business licensed under this chapter. Prior to January 1, 2025, a local unit of government may adopt temporary restrictions to safeguard the planning process and to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 342.13 – Local Control (e) If a local unit of government is conducting studies or has authorized a study to be conducted or has held or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose of considering adoption or amendment of reasonable restrictions on the time, place, and manner of the operation of a cannabis business, the governing body of the local unit of government may adopt an interim ordinance applicable to all or part of its jurisdiction for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. Before adopting the interim ordinance, the governing body must hold a public hearing. The interim ordinance may regulate, restrict, or prohibit the operation of a cannabis business within the jurisdiction or a portion thereof until January 1, 2025. Present considerations: The new law creates licensing requirements for the cannabis industry, and further regulatory details are likely to come as the OCM establishes policy and rulemaking. City codes currently do not have a regulatory framework to address this new industry. Land use regulations for all cannabis businesses including growing, processing, distribution and retail need to be developed in zoning. Cannabis businesses will need to receive local authorization of meeting the applicable requirements before the OCM issues a business license. A cannabis business registration may be developed by a city, town or county to provide a review process and future compliance reviews. Fees, which the amounts are capped by the state, for providing these services may be collected initially and annually by the local government issuing the registration. Cities or towns may choose to authorize the county in which they are located to assume the registration program. While the establishment or operation of cannabis businesses may not be prohibited locally, a registration program can be developed that could limit the maximum number of retail establishments if desired based on the community’s population. Staff is recommending adopting the interim ordinance to provide time for the public process development of land-use regulations and creating a product registration program with appropriate fees to address the overall community needs. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6c) Page 3 Title: Moratorium related to commercial cannabis activities The temporary moratorium does not impact current medical cannabis or the current lower- potency hemp edible retailers. It also does not impact personal use. As of Oct. 1, 2023 lower- potency hemp edible retailers are now required to register with the State of MN; however, cities may continue to license those retailers at this time. Financial considerations: None Next steps: The planning and zoning department plans to begin discussion with council at the Nov. 16 council meeting regarding land use regulations for the cannabis industry. Building and Energy will follow up with council early next year to discuss a fee-for-service registration program as the most effective method for reviewing proposed businesses that meet all city requirements. Administration is planned to occur through the business licensing division. As previously discussed with council, amendments will also be made during 2024 to the paraphernalia chapter provisions for consistency with the state law. As review of city ordinances continues, other portions may also require changes. City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6c) Page 4 Title: Moratorium related to commercial cannabis activities Ordinance No. _______ Interim ordinance prohibiting the operation of cannabis businesses The City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota does ordain: Section 1. Findings and purpose: A. By enacting 2023 Session Laws Chapter 63, the Minnesota Legislature enacted Minn. Stat. Ch. 342, legalizing adult-use cannabis and permitting the operation of cannabis businesses and the sale of cannabis flower and cannabis products for human consumption. This law creates a new agency, the Office of Cannabis Management, to regulate the sales of cannabis products. B. The new law does enact some requirements for production, labeling, and testing, and sale of cannabis products at the state government level. However, the new law creates uncertainty that will need to be resolved by the passage of further regulations by the Office of Cannabis Management. C. The new law establishes that cannabis businesses are subject to a new local registration system and must comply with local zoning code. The new law provides no guidance on how cities are to zone the new businesses, leaving it to local control. D. Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 342.13, the city is authorized to adopt an interim ordinance prohibiting the operation of a cannabis business in order to protect the planning process and the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens. Under Minn. Stat. § 342.13, such ordinance may remain in effect until January 1, 2025. E. Pursuant to its general police powers, including but not limited to, Minn. Stat. § 412.221, subd. 32, the city may enact regulations regarding to promote the health, safety, order, convenience, and the general welfare of the city. This power permits the city to implement a moratorium to study the selling, testing, manufacturing, and distributing of cannabis products to determine if regulations are necessary for the sake of good order of the city. F. The City Council finds that it is necessary to study the application of 2023 Session Laws Chapter 63, and the products, uses, and businesses related thereto, in order to assess the necessity for and efficacy of regulations and restrictions relating to the selling, testing, manufacturing, and distributing of cannabis flower and cannabis products including through zoning ordinances, in order to protect the public health, safety, and welfare of its residents. Section 2. Definitions: The following terms when used in this ordinance shall mean: Official controls. “Official controls” or “controls” means ordinances and regulations which control the physical development of the city or any part thereof or any detail thereof and implement the general objectives of the comprehensive plan. Official City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6c) Page 5 Title: Moratorium related to commercial cannabis activities controls include ordinances establishing zoning, subdivision controls, site plan regulations, sanitary codes, building codes, and official maps. Cannabis Business. “Cannabis Business” has the meaning given in Minn. Stat. § 342.01, subd. 14, as amended. Cannabis Flower. “Cannabis Flower” has the meaning given in Minn. Stat. § 342.01, subd. 16, as amended. Cannabis Product. has the meaning given in Minn. Stat. § 342.01, subd. 20, as amended. Section 3. Intent and authorization: A. It is the intent of this ordinance to allow the City of St. Louis Park time to complete a study concerning adoption of revisions of the City’s official controls for the manufacturing, testing, distributing, and selling of Cannabis Flower and Cannabis Products, and the operation of Cannabis Businesses. B. City staff is directed and authorized to conduct a study of the City’s official controls that may need to be adopted or amended to protect the public health, safety, and welfare as they relate to the manufacturing, testing, distributing, and selling of Cannabis Flower and Cannabis Products, and the operation of Cannabis Businesses. Section 4. Moratorium: A. Pending the completion of the above referenced study and the adoption of appropriate official controls, the following is prohibited within the city: The commercial manufacturing, distributing, and selling of Cannabis Flower and Cannabis Products, and the operation of any Cannabis Business. B. The city shall not issue any license, permission, or permit related to the manufacture, distribution, and sale of Cannabis Flower, Cannabis Product, or the Operation of any Cannabis Business. C. This moratorium does not apply to the selling, testing, manufacturing, or distributing of Cannabis Products or Cannabis Flower or the operation of Cannabis Businesses related to the Medical Cannabis Program as administered by the Minnesota Department of Health, provided that such activity is done in accordance with the regulations and laws of Minnesota regarding Medical Cannabis. Section 5. Enforcement: The city may enforce this Ordinance by mandamus, injunctive relief, or other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, in consultation with the City Attorney, to initiate any legal action deemed necessary City council meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 6c) Page 6 Title: Moratorium related to commercial cannabis activities to secure compliance with this Ordinance. A violation of this Ordinance is also subject to the city’s general penalty in City Code § 1-13. Section 6. Effective date and term: This ordinance shall take effect immediately upon its passage and publication by law and shall remain in effect until January 1, 2025, or until the adoption of the official controls being studied, whichever occurs first. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the city council: _____________ By: __________________________________ By: __________________________________ Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: ____________________________________ _____________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren M. Mattick, city attorney First reading October 16, 2023 Second reading November 6, 2023 Date of publication November 16, 2023 Date ordinance takes effect December 1, 2023 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Discussion item: 1 Executive summary Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Recommended action: No action is required at this time. The purpose of this report is to update the city council on Arrive + Thrive and introduce four “big ideas” that staff would like to discuss during the study session. Policy consideration: How should we measure progress and success in the light rail station areas and West Excelsior Boulevard areas over the next 20 years? Summary: The Arrive + Thrive project will create four small area plans for gateway areas within the community to guide decisions about development, investment and land use. The process includes updates to the existing plans for the three METRO Green Line Extension light rail transit stations: Beltline Boulevard, Wooddale Avenue and Louisiana Avenue, and the creation of a new plan to guide investments along Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100. The resulting gateway plans should communicate, align and advance the community’s interests, the city’s strategic priorities and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This report provides a summary of the first phase of community engagement for the project conducted in late spring of 2023. The project team also conducted a technical analysis of the existing conditions of each gateway area. The community’s experiences collected through engagement and the existing conditions informed ideas for each gateway area. We will test these big ideas in the second phase of community engagement, which will be held over the next month. During the study session, the city council will be asked to discuss one big idea for each gateway area, focusing on those ideas that represent what the project team identified as key policy or investment changes within the four gateway areas. Financial or budget considerations: The Arrive + Thrive planning process activities are included in the 2023 and 2024 budgets totaling up to $125,000. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad rand of housing and neighborhood-oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion, community advisory group overview, phase 1 engagement summary, DRAFT current conditions summaries, big ideas by gateway Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy community development director Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Discussion Background: Project purpose The Arrive + Thrive project is an opportunity for the city to update plans for the three light rail station areas as well as West Excelsior Boulevard. This project will create a consistent framework for planning within all four gateway areas, as well as identify implementation strategies to achieve these plans. The process around Arrive + Thrive also provides an opportunity for these plans to effectively incorporate the city’s strategic priorities into the plans and implementation. Community advisory group The planning approach for Arrive + Thrive emphasizes both the importance of technical expertise of city staff as well as the lived experiences of community members. A community engagement plan was developed in early spring 2023, along with the creation of a community advisory group for the project. An overview of the community advisory group and its role in the process has been attached to this report. In April 2023, the community advisory group started with 11 members, who helped refine the community engagement plan as well as developed the name of the project: Arrive + Thrive. Additional members were sought in the following months to represent the wide variety of perspectives and interests within the study areas, bringing the total membership up to 15. Phase 1 engagement summary The first round of engagement for Arrive + Thrive was held in May and June of 2023. The purpose of this phase was to inform community members of the project and to learn about individuals’ experiences in the gateway areas. There were two main engagement activities during this phase: an online interactive map and survey and an in-person open house event. In total, around 150 community members participated in phase 1 of engagement. A full summary of the engagement is available on the project website and as an attachment to this report. Existing conditions summary Attached to this report are the draft current conditions summary for each gateway. The summaries provide context for each gateway by looking at demographics and land use changes in the areas. For each light rail station area, an additional analysis of the existing station area plans has been included within the summary. This analysis reviews the goals and objectives of each existing station area plan, highlights what has been accomplished from those plans and outlines what still needs to be implemented. The last page of each summary will be filled with the input and ideas provided by community members during phase 2 of engagement. Present considerations: Phase 2 engagement approach The second phase of engagement will share “big ideas” identified for each gateway based on community input from phase 1 and the consultants’ technical analysis of existing conditions and the current station area plans. The intent of phase 2 is to present these ideas to the public through a variety of engagement activities to test these ideas and discover new ideas from community members. This phase will host a variety of events and activities for each sub area. Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Phase 2 participation strategies Strategy Purpose Audience Community advisory group meeting #3 Review existing conditions and concept planning framework for the overall process and each specific study area. Community advisory group Events Community events and activities to share big ideas and gather feedback. Individual activities will be held specific to each study area. Public, Stakeholders Interactive map Share the big ideas via an online platform and collect feedback. Public, Stakeholders Website information Provide general project update. Public, Stakeholders Gateway events Specific events have been identified for each gateway to cater to the surrounding community and big ideas. Event/Group Focus gateway(s) Date/Time/Location Completed? Fire department open house, pop-up All September 19, 5-7 pm, Fire Station 1 Yes Fall festival, pop-up Wooddale Gateway October 2, 5-7 pm, Susan Lindgren Elementary Yes Excelsior Boulevard businesses, business survey West Excelsior Gateway Week of October 9 Yes Music on the Patio event, pop-up Beltline Gateway October 14, 6-8 pm Planned Howl-o-ween event, pop- up Wooddale Gateway and Beltline Gateway October 15, 12-3 pm, Wolfe Park Planned Parent-teacher conference, pop-up All gateways October 17-18 & November 17 Planned West Excelsior Blvd, walking tour West Excelsior Boulevard October 23, 4:30 Planned Goblins on Ice event, pop- up Wooddale Gateway and Beltline Gateway October 27, 5:45-7 pm, ROC Planned Businesses near Louisiana Station, focus group Louisiana Gateway October 30, 12 pm Planned South Oak Hill, neighborhood meeting Louisiana Gateway Schedule TBD Planned Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Page 4 Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Overview of “big ideas” Attached are the big ideas identified for each gateway. Phase 2 engagement events will present these ideas to community members to see how well they work and to spark new ideas. The intent is to affirm the big ideas and gather specific input to shape the implementation actions of each gateway. Topics for discussion During the study session, staff will request discussion on one big idea for each gateway area. Please review these big ideas, questions, and additional considerations to prepare for this discussion. We will reserve some time at the end of the discussion to highlight any additional questions or comments about other big ideas that are shown on the attached gateway exhibits that council may have for staff. Louisiana gateway big idea Redevelopment opportunities: The existing station area plan focuses on employment and offices for redevelopment 1. As markets have changed since that plan’s adoption, what should redevelopment within the gateway area look like? 2. What would development look like in this gateway that advances racial equity, environmental sustainability and other adopted city priorities in St. Louis Park? West Excelsior gateway big idea Redevelopment opportunities: There are two sites along the corridor with the largest potential for redevelopment: the former Jessen Press site and the former Party City site. 1. What should redevelopment of these sites look like? 2. What would development look like in this gateway that advances racial equity, housing and neighborhood-oriented development and other adopted city priorities in St. Louis Park? Wooddale gateway big idea Redevelopment opportunities: Current planning focuses this area on office development; there is an opportunity to reconsider its land uses for remaining development parcels 1. How can redevelopment of the Burlington/MicroCenter site complement the Wooddale gateway area? 2. What would development look like in this gateway that advances racial equity, housing and neighborhood-oriented development and other adopted city priorities in St. Louis Park? Beltline gateway big idea Redevelopment opportunities: There is an opportunity to catalyze the Raleigh Avenue and 35th Street area into a distinct district, with its own identity and redevelopment direction 1. How can the investments and redevelopment along Beltline Boulevard be used to realize the vision? 2. What would development look like in this gateway that advances racial equity, mobility and other adopted city priorities in St. Louis Park? Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Page 5 Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Next steps: Council members are encouraged to share the upcoming phase 2 engagement events with community members. Online engagement and events will run through mid-November. After phase 2 has wrapped up, the project team will finalize the big ideas and provide technical analysis for their implementation. All of these elements will culminate in draft plans, which will be presented to the community for a third phase of engagement in early 2024. A final draft of the plans and implementation strategies are planned to be presented to the city council in early spring 2024. St. Louis Park small area plans Community advisory committee overview The City of St. Louis Park is beginning a city-led planning process to update existing transit station area plans and create a new small area plan to guide development decisions. The process will include updates to the three existing light rail station area plans and the creation of a new small area plan for western Excelsior Boulevard. The resulting plans will provide guidance and implementation actions to support development that aligns with the community’s interests, the city’s strategic priorities, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The community advisory group (CAG) will advise the planning team in three areas during the small area plan process: There are four key groups that will be involved in the small area plan process: •Support the identification of the community’s needs and experiences •Provide an understanding of the community •Identify the best ways to provide information and gather input Laura Chamberlain, AICP | senior planner | City of St. Louis Park Phone: 952.924.2573 | Email: lchamberlain@stlouisparkmn.gov Advisors to the community for the small area planning process... Community advisory group role and purpose Who is involved in the process? Contact information Small area plans overview Community and stakeholders Community advisory group Planning team City of St. Louis Park Who is included? Community members, visitors, property owners, business owners, employees, etc. Interested community members and leaders SRF Consulting Group, Mend Collaborative, and city staff City departments, city council, planning commission, other commissions/councils What is their role? Participate in the community engagement process and share input Share needs, desires, and experiences; Connect with the community Guide the plans’ development, including facilitating the process, analyzing technical data and summarizing community understanding Provide guidance and direction to the plans via policy and inform solutions and outcomes specific to the community Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 6 St. Louis Park small area plans Community advisory committee overview •Those that are connected to their community within St. Louis Park •Those who want to help shape future decisions within the small area plans •Those who have an interest in learning about how decisions are made within the city Laura Chamberlain, AICP | senior planner | City of St. Louis Park Phone: 952.924.2573 | Email: lchamberlain@stlouisparkmn.gov Advisors to the community for the small area planning process... Why join the community advisory group? What should community advisory group members expect? Contact information Who should join the community advisory group? Connect the broader community to the process to inform outcomes Ensure the process responds to community input and is truly reflective of St. Louis Park Set the framework on how we collaborate with the community and gather input What are members committing to? Attend five in-person meetings over the course of the year-long project and review materials and deliverables. Meetings will generally be 90 minutes but may extend to up to two hours in length. What is the expectation of a member? •Promote the small area planning process and activities with the community •Participate in at least one engagement event •Attend the five community advisory group meetings •Prepare for discussion and review materials •Engage with the planning team What can members expect from the team? •An open and transparent process - through shown links and connections to how input is used to inform solutions •Thoughtful discussion and analysis - no actions are done to simply check a box •A process rooted in public input and sound technical process Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 7 This report summarizes engagement events and community feedback collected from surveys and in-person events. The Arrive + Thrive Open House from June 27th, an online survey, and an online interactive map are included. Over 150 community members have participated. August 2023 PHASE 1 ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY Place a Pin! This needs attention I have an idea I have a concern I like this Legend: Green Line Extension Bike Routes & Trails Louisiana Gatew a y Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Walker St Cedar L a k e Tr ail CreeksidePark Methodist Hospital St. Louis Park High School Loffler Companies JorvigPark LouisianaOaks Park Oxford St Brunswick Ave L ouisia n a A v e M innehahaCreekPINK BLUE PURPLE GREEN Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 8 Arrive + Thrive Phase 1: Issues and Opportunities When: May 1 to July 14, 2023 Place a Pin! This needs attention I have an idea I have a concern I like this Legend: Green Line Extension Bike Routes & TrailsLouisiana Gatew a y Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Walker St Cedar L a k e Tr ail CreeksidePark Methodist Hospital St. Louis Park High School Loffler Companies JorvigPark LouisianaOaks Park Oxford St Brunswick Ave L ouisia n a A v e M innehaha CreekCOLOR COLOR COLOR COLOR Goals of the Last Plan Developed in 2003, the Elmwood Area Land Use, Transit, and Transportation Study document provides a set of Elmwood Area (now Wooddale) planning principles, a range of recommendations, and land use guiding recommendations. Goals from that plan include: Redevelop opportunity sitesfor residential, office, and mixed-uses in line with future transit developments. Maintain or redevelop opportunity sites to support current and future job sectors. Redevelop opportunity sitesfor multimodal transit developments, such as park and rides. Improve pedestrian and bicycle accommodations tocurrent and future amenities. Enhance the public realm by way of streetscape and open space improvements. Population Between 2010 and 2020, thepopulation in census tracts in the Wooddale Station Gateway area grew by between -6.3 percent and 22.4 percent (10.5 percent citywide). Housing In census tracts in the Wooddale Station Gateway area, the percentage of renter-occupied housing is between 12.0 percent and 71.9 percent (41.9 percent citywide). Employment & Income Between 2010 and 2020, the median household income in census tracts in the Wooddale Station Gateway area grew between 16.6 percent and 63.0 percent (39.7 percent citywide). Mobility 63% 60% 56% Percentage of jobs in transportation, warehousing, and utilities Percentage of jobs in other services Percentage of jobs in public administration Wooddale Station 1 5 6 4 3 7 9 11 12 2 1 Highway 7 interchange and improvements, 2011 2 Wooddale Ave bikeway improvements, 2020 3 Via Sol apartments, 2022 4 Union Park Flats, 2024 5 Village in the Park condominiums and townhomes, 2006 6 36th Street reconstruction, 2022 7 OlyHi mixed-use development, 2025 8 Towerlight senior housing, 2012 9 Hoigaard Village mixed-use development, 2007 10 The Elmwood apartments, 2019 11 Firestation 1, 2011 12 Arbor House apartments, 2023 Wooddale Station Gateway 8% 47% 46% Percentage of households in the study area with two or more vehicles. Percentage of households in the study area with one vehicle. Percentage of households in the study area with no vehicles. Lake StWo o d d a l e A v e 36th St Hwy 100Hwy 7 Area Investments Environment The greater Minnehaha Creek Watershed is a critical natural resource in the Wooddale Gateway area. Future developments should use best practices to promote positive stewardship of the watershed. 8 10 The first phase of the Arrive + Thrive Gateway Planning process set out to inform the community of the project, share its purpose and process and learn about individuals’ experiences in the study area. Engagement activities were targeted at learning these experiences across each of the four gateways. Feedback will inform the refinement of goals for the four gateways and solidify the issues and opportunities analysis. A number of tactics were used to promote the open house and community survey, including: •City and neighborhood social media accounts (e.g., Facebook, Instagram, NextDoor) •GovDelivery emails to existing subscribers •Yards signs placed in the study area •Attendance at community events •Flyers and postcards located throughout the community There were two primary methods for collecting input for the first phase of engagement. An open house on June 27th at the Municipal Service Center provided an opportunity to gather in- person with community members and gather feedback. The online engagement opportunities were available from May 1 to July 14, 2023, providing an opportunity for the community to learn about and engage with the project. Activities at the open house included the following. •Project overview and context •Push pin activity: locate the places that need attention, have something you like, or you have a concern about •Priorities activity: identify the priorities that are most important to you for each gateway •Create a headline: what will they be writing about after implementation The input gathered at the open house was included within the online survey summary in the following pages. Phase 1 purpose Phase 1 promotion Phase 1 events Join the conversation! What’s next for gateways into St. Louis Park? Help inform future investments and priorities at the three METRO Green Line light rail stations and West Excelsior Boulevard. bit.ly/slp-arrive-and-thrive THRIVE+ARRIVE ST. LOUIS PARK GATEWAY PLANNING 2Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 9 Online community survey When: May 1 - July 14, 2023 20 Questions, open-ended and multiple choice 146 Participants The average household size represented is between 2-3 individuals.(147 respondents) The community is drawn to the study area(s) because: The community is excited about: The community is concerned about: Race and Ethnicity Gender LGBTQ+ Community Most respondents (over 75%) live in a single unit detatched house. (144 respondents) Almost 10% of respondents identified as a member of the LGBTQ+ community. (136 respondents) •They live and/or work nearby •They enjoy outdoor activities and look forward to future trail connections •They are looking forward to using the new light rail line •They are interested in future development and improvements •Trails and connections to open space for pedestrians and cyclists; improved walkability •Connections to Downtown by light rail •New residential and mixed-use development, and overall neighborhood revitalization •Environmental restoration and improved biodiversity •Limited infrastructure and traffic from new development •Lack of neighborhood cohesiveness and connectivity •Pedestrian and cyclist safety •Lack of senior and affordable housing opportunities No(90.44%) Yes(9.56%)Other(2.24%) Female(58.210%) Non-Binary(1.49%) Male(38.06%) Other(4.3%)Black(0.75%) Hispanic or Latino(3.76%) White(93.98%) American Indian or Alaska Native (3.01%) 3Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 10 The average household size represented is between 2-3 individuals.(147 respondents) Over half of the respondent’s households take home over 118,000 dollars annually. (121 respondents) Over 70% of respondents do not have any children in their household. (143 respondents) Most of the respondents are between 31 and 69 years old. (141 Respondents) What is your relationship to St. Louis Park? (Select all that apply) Household size Other key takeaways: Home type Homeowners Vs. renters Most respondents (over 75%) live in a single unit detatched house. (144 respondents) Over 95% of respondents own their home. (143 respondents) •Connections to the open spaces within the study area could be improved. 20% of respondents did not agree that these spaces were well-maintained and accessible. Over 30% were neutral. •Over 45% of respondents agreed/strongly agreed they could find housing within the study areathat met their needs with access to services they wanted. Around 17% did not agree. 0 - 35,199 58,650 - 70,379 35,200 - 58,649 70,380 - 89,399 89,400 - 118,199 118,200 + Household income Household age 100500 150 I live here I go to school here I work here I visit friends and family here I shop and go to restaurants here Other 20%40%0%60% 25 500 75 0 - 5 11-14 6-10 15-17 18-30 31-49 50-69 70+ Own(96.5%) Rent(3.5%) Condo(21.8%) Single Unit Detached House(21.8%) Apartment (2.78%) Townhouse(6.25%) 4-6(21.1%) 1(21.8%) 2-3(57%) 4Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 11 Interactive map When: 1 May - 14 July 2023 1 map with 4 location identifiers 57 participants, 152 contributions This map of St. Louis Park highlights the four Gateway study areas - Louisiana Station Gateway, Wooddale Station Gateway, Beltline Station Gateway, and Excelsior Boulevard Gateway. There were 58 ideas, 48 concerns, 17 likes, and 29 notices for attention added to the map. Overall, there are opportunities to create separate identities for each of the study areas while developing a cohesive plan. Improvements can be made to pedestrian and cyclist connections throughout the study areas - wayfinding, greenways, pocket parks, sidewalks and bike lanes, and crosswalks. There is also a need to connect the neighborhoods and amenities on the north and south sides of the new light rail tracks and Highway 7. 5Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary NNTS Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 12 Louisiana Station Gateway Wooddale Station Gateway Beltline Station Gateway West Excelsior Boulevard Gateway • A shuttle service from light rail stop to the Hospital • Ensuring protection of and highlighting the creek as part of future development • Additional neighborhood amenities on the north side of the new light rail stop such as pocket parks, • Additional greenways and improved tree canopy for pedestrians and cyclists • Traffic is very congested in this area • Highway overpasses are not pedestrian friendly • The existing bike lanes are not separated enough • There is an opportunity here to improve the north side of the study area and create a destination for restaurants and shops • Bass Lake Park is popular within the area and the community would like greenways to connect to the regional parkway networks • There is an opportunity to add smaller-scale affordable housing options within this area • A lot of this study area is industrial and could be redeveloped in a unique way • Pedestrian routes need safer sidewalks and crosswalks • This corridor should be more pedestrian and bicycle-friendly with improved crosswalks and separation from traffic • Parking should be considered in redevelopment • The intersection of West Excelsior Boulevard and Wooddale Avenue is congested and “messy” • The new retail spaces should prioritize small, locally-owned businesses Interactive Map Key Takeaways 6Arrive + Thrive: St. Louis Park Gateway Planning Engagement Summary Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 13 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Louisiana Gateway Current Conditions Summary DRAFT - Oct 2023 Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 1) Title: Arrive + Thrive update and discussion Page 14 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Policy conditionsCurrent conditionsLouisiana Gateway: June 2023 Louisiana Gateway area, looking northwest Louisiana Gateway area, looking south Louisiana Gateway area, looking southeast Louisiana Gateway area showing Metro Green Line LRT construction, looking east Methodist Hospital Minnehaha Creek Highway 7 Louisiana Oaks Park Louisiana Ave Louisiana Ave Louisiana Ave Station Louisiana Ave Station Wooddale Ave Station Louisiana Ave Station Methodist Hospital Cedar Lake Trail DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 15 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPolicy conditionsLouisiana Station Area Framework + Design Guidelines Developed in 2013, the Louisiana Station Area Framework and Design Guidelines provided a set of planning principles, a range of recommendations, and land use guiding recommendations for the Louisiana Gateway. The following outlines specific goals of the plan and the recent investments within the gateway area. Plan goals Illustrative plan: 2013 Encourage transit-oriented development that supports transit use, increases the mix and density of land uses, strengthens nearby neighborhoods, and improves pedestrian environments. Promote investment, intensification, and redevelopment in the Louisiana Ave station area to support its growth as an employment center. Leverage healthcare demand to create a healthcare-oriented district that links services with housing and amenities. Manage parking to support multimodal transit, while lessening impacts to development potential and pedestrian environments. Create a connected system of parks and open spaces, pedestrian and bike network, and complete streets in the station area. OFFICE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (REINVESTMENT) LIGHT INDUSTRIAL (REDEVELOPMENT) RETAIL OTHER COMMERCIAL PLAZA PARKS + OPEN SPACE PARKING RAMP PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS 58INTRODUCTIONPRECEDENT STUDIESEXISTING CONDITIONSVISION + PRINCIPLESFRAMEWORK PLANSDESIGN GUIDELINESPed/Bike Underpass New Stre et Structured Parking (5 Levels) Structured Parking (5 Levels) Structured Parking (3 Levels) Structured Parking (3 Levels)Structured Parking (3 Levels)Structured Parking (3 Levels) Surface Parking Surface Parking Surface Parking Surface Parking Surface Parking Surface Parking Surface Parking Park & Ri d e R a m p Structured Parking (3 Levels )LRT Platf or m Single StorySingle Story (2 Story) (2 Story) (2 Story) (5 Story) (4 Story) (3 Story) (5 Story) (3 Story) (5 Story) (5 Story) (3 Story) (3 Story) Hotel (3 Story) Existing Light Industrial (4 Story) (2 Story) Existing Light Industrial Single Story Transit Pl az a P e d e s t r i a n S t r e e t New Stre et N e w S t r e e t Proposed Ped/Bike Connection on Removed Switching Wye* Fig. 5-10. NORTH STATiON - iLLUSTRATiVE MASTER PLAN 0 200’100’ 400’N Open Water Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater Stormwater Wetland Wetland Wetland Proposed Open Water Amenity DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 16 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPolicy conditionsLouisiana Station Area Framework + Design Guidelines The current plan lists a number of recommendations and actions that will assist the community in achieving the established goals for the Louisiana Station area. While progress has been made, there is still work to do. Land use + development: The plan recognized the unique employment offerings within the gateway and identified opportunities to maintain those opportunities as they are not allowed elsewhere in the community. These uses have generally remained in the Louisiana Gateway. Redevelopment opportunities have been pursued included the Loeffler reuse to the north of the station and a variety of investment in the Historic Walker Lake district. Mobility + access: A number of transportation investments have improved mobility in the gateway: •Alignment of the Louisiana Station was solidified and construction way completed. •A rail and Cedar Lake Trail overpass of Louisiana Avenue was completed. •The Louisiana Avenue bridge over Minnehaha Creek was completed. •Construction of sidewalks to close gaps continues throughout the gateway. •Cycle tracks were constructed on each side of Louisiana Avenue. What has been completed? 1.Redevelopment opportunity 2.Historic Walker Lake district, rezoned for mixed-use development, 2021 3.Stormwater facility and pumphouse 4.Loeffler, rezoned for adaptive reuse commercial and residential developments 5.Stormwater opportunity 6.Louisiana Avenue reconstruction 7.Minnehaha Creek restoration and water quality improvements Policy conditionsLouisiana Station 1 3 2 2 4 5 Hwy 7 Lake St Oxford St 7 6 Louisiana AveDRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 17 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1.Introduce street level commercial opportunities 2.Pedestrian pathway connecting the station to the medical campus 3.Conversion of the south rail spur 4.Meadowbrook Lane extension over Minnehaha CreekPolicy conditionsLouisiana Station Area Framework + Design Guidelines Land use + development: Limited redevelopment opportunities were identified in the plan. The following policy or guidance recommendations have yet to be completed: •Transition of larger surface parking due to a struggle with soil contamination and required mediation. •Introduction of street level commercial, which could be considered with potential Oxford Street redevelopment. •Maintaining access and viability to Highway 7. Mobility + access: While many improvements were made, the following recommendations have yet to be implemented: •Pedestrian pathway to connect the Louisiana Station to the hospital campus. •Construct loop streets for both east and west of Louisiana. •Convert the south rail spur into a trail connect. The south spur is currently active, serving businesses within the gateway. •Continue to improve street connectivity for all modes. •Coordinate bus connections to SWLRT with Metro Transit. •Construct a Meadowbrook Lane bridge over Minnehaha Creek. What is left to accomplish? 2 Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Oxford St Louisiana Ave1 3 1 2 4 DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 18 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYSocial conditionsPopulation Between 2010 and 2020, the population in census tracts in the Louisiana Gateway area grew by between 3.7 percent and 13.0 percent (10.5 percent citywide). Age The median age for the Louisiana Gateway ranged from 32.4 to 35.3 years in 2021, representing a similar age demographic to the city as a whole. Housing In census tracts in the Louisiana Gateway area, the percentage of renter-occupied housing is between 12.0 percent and 52.0 percent (41.9 percent citywide). Employment & Income Between 2010 and 2020, the median household income in census tracts in the Louisiana Gateway area grew between 46.2 percent and 63.0 percent (39.7 percent citywide). Mobility 63% 60% 56% Percentage of jobs in transportation, warehousing, and utilities Percentage of jobs in other services Percentage of jobs in public administration 8% 47% 46% Percentage of households in the study area have access to two or more vehicles. Percentage of households in the study area have access to one vehicle. Percentage of households in the study area with no access to vehicles. Physical conditionsArrive + Thrive study area conditions Louisiana gateway conditions 10.4% 49% $1,923 $1,427 population growth from 2010 of all jobs in St. Louis Park are located in the study area median monthly mortgage cost median monthly rent cost The city as a whole grew by 10.5 percent. The educational services and health care industry is the largest sector.$$ DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 19 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPhysical conditionsLand use + development Businesses + neighborhoods Mobility + access Parks + natural systems Current land uses: The primary land uses include Industrial, Institutional, and Retail, with surrounding single family and multi- family residential to the east and west. Future land use: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides a transition of industrial uses to business park, while maintaining some industrial areas. Retail areas near the station are identified as Transit Oriented Development. Mixed use opportunities are presented in the Historic Walker Lake area. Recent development: Recent development in the Louisiana Gateway has been limited to the Loeffler building and larger investments within Historic Walker Lake. Infrastructure: The existing street network is not well connected, with limited opportunities to move throughout the gateway by personal vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian. The south rail spur still remains active through the gateway serving at least one business. There is limited sidewalk connectivity. Bike and pedestrian mobility: The western edge of Louisiana is the most used for walkers and bikers in the study. However, volumes are the lowest for this gateway compare to others. The Cedar Lake Trail, however, carries at least 150 trips per day. Between 75 and 150 walkers and bikers cross Highway 7 on either side of Louisiana Avenue. Access: Individual property access does not generally present concerns within the study area. Neighborhoods: The Louisiana Gateway includes portions of the South Oak Hill, Brooklawns and Meadow Brook neighborhoods. Employment centers: The industrial uses within the gateway are identified as an employment area. Methodist Hospital is a major employer in this gateway, and the city has a whole. Parcel utilization: There are a number of parcels identified as under utilize near the station. Very few industrial or commercial properties are identified as well utilized (where the land value is 25 percent or less than the total property value). Areas of recent development in Historic Walker Lake are well utilized. Parks: Meadowbrook Manor Park and Louisiana Oaks Park are located within the gateway. Meadowbrook Golf Course is also located to the south of the study area. All areas are located within a half mile walk-shed to a park. Natural systems: The Louisiana Gateway study area consists of primarily impervious surfaces (pavement and buildings). The surrounding neighborhoods have a larger tree canopy and neighborhood streets include boulevard trees. Wetlands: Minnehaha Creek is located within the southwest quadrant of the study area, which is supported by green infrastructure. The creek continues to experience improvements and enhancements. DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 20 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYKey themesLouisiana Gateway Focus areas to explore: Big ideas to test: Redevelopment opportunities in industrial areas and older multifamily Preservation efforts of existing small businesses Balance/compatibility between uses Avoiding/mitigating displacement of current residents and preserving affordability Connections to and potential expansion of open spaces and public amenities, especially in flood prone areas •Introduction of street level commercial uses that provide employee based amenities that encourage movement throughout the gateway. •Continued support of existing industrial uses, with opportunities for reinvestment if the opportunity arises. •Preserve affordable housing options currently available within the gateway. •Enhance connections and experiences with natural resources the study area. •Improve trail and sidewalk connectivity. •How to connect light rail area to Methodist Hospital (new streets, shuttle, bike/ped connections?) •General approach to parking lot conversion to development or green space •Regional stormwater facility that also acts as green space/public space •Connectivity to Historic Walker Lake •Connection between existing parks and green spaces (including future MCWD connections to Blake Rd Station development) •Preserving NOAH within Meadowbrook/Era •Redevelopment approach for industrial areas Of the four gateway areas, the Louisiana Gateway has seen the least amount of private redevelopment in the last 20 years, but it has been transformed by public investment in infrastructure and Minnehaha Creek corridor. Future redevelopment of this commercial and industrial area will need to take a balanced approach to appreciate and improve nearby amenities. Redevelopment can provide safe and convenient connections between public transit, Methodist Hospital, nearby neighborhoods, and parks and natural areas. Redevelopments can also foster positive relationships with nearby amenities, such as Minnehaha Creek, to sustain those resources for future generations. What is next?DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 21 LOUISIANA GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Big ideas to test:Ideas that will not be carried forward:The following ideas were either presented in the current study or identified during this process and will no long be considered for the Louisiana Gateway. The following graphic will be updated to reflect the ideas and concepts identified by the Community Advisory Group and staff charrettes. What is next?2 Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Oxford StLouisiana AveDRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 22 WEST EXCELSIOR GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY West Excelsior Gateway Current Conditions Summary DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 23 WEST EXCELSIOR GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Policy conditionsCurrent conditionsWest Excelsior Gateway: June 2023 Excelsior Gateway area, looking northeast Excelsior Gateway area showing Meadowbrook Park, looking north Excelsior Gateway area showing Minnehaha Creek and Louisiana Gateway area, looking north Excelsior Gateway area showing Minnehaha Creek and Methodist Hospital, looking northeast Excelsior Blvd Excelsior Blvd Methodist Hospital Meadowbrook Park Minnehaha Creek Minnehaha Creek Louisiana Ave Louisiana Ave Louisiana Ave Station Excelsior Blvd Excelsior Blvd DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 24 WEST EXCELSIOR GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPolicy conditionsDesign Guidelines for the South Side of Excelsior Boulevard West Excelsior Blvd is a unique corridor without a dedicated guiding document in place, but The Design Guidelines for the South Side of Excelsior Boulevard (2015) serves as a valuable resource for East Excelsior Boulevard. Guidelines from that plan and other gateway plans include: Plan goals Area investments Capture the value of high quality transit-oriented developments at nearby LRT station areas. Encourage and preserve neighborhood-scaled, mixed uses in the corridor that are stylistically harmonious, but not uniform. Promote engaged site and building frontages that bring life and energy to streets and sidewalks. Encourage and preserve smaller, affordable, neighborhood-oriented business spaces. Prioritize people in developments by orienting site designs and building architecture to human- scaled experiences and a range of uses over time. Ensure that vehicular traffic, access, and parking does not negatively impact human activities, such as walking, biking, and dining. Investments and opportunities have presented for the West Excelsior Gateway even with a lack of dedicated plan. A key investment was the roadway improvements constructed through the area. Additionally, there are multiple redevelopment opportunities to be considered and studied along the corridor. 1.Redevelopment opportunitu at Jessen Press 2.Excelsior Boulevard improvements 3.Redevelopment opportunity at Party City site Excelsior Blvd 1 2 3 Excelsior Bl v dAlabama AveYosemite AveBrunswick AveCambridge St Hwy 100DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 25 WEST EXCELSIOR GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYSocial conditionsPopulation Between 2010 and 2020, the population in census tracts in the West Excelsior Gateway area grew by 10.3 percent (10.5 percent citywide). Age The median age for the West Excelsior Gateway is 32.4 years in 2021, nearly 3 years younger that the median age for the city. Housing In census tracts in the West Excelsior Gateway area, the percentage of renter-occupied housing is between 52.0 percent (41.9 percent citywide). Employment & Income Between 2010 and 2020, the median household income in census tracts in the West Excelsior Gateway area grew between 46.2 percent and 63.0 percent (39.7 percent citywide). Mobility 63% 60% 56% Percentage of jobs in transportation, warehousing, and utilities Percentage of jobs in other services Percentage of jobs in public administration 8% 47% 46% Percentage of households in the study area have access to two or more vehicles. Percentage of households in the study area have access to one vehicle. Percentage of households in the study area with no access to vehicles. Physical conditionsArrive + Thrive study area conditions West Excelsior gateway conditions 10.4% 49% $1,923 $1,427 population growth from 2010 of all jobs in St. Louis Park are located in the study area median monthly mortgage cost median monthly rent cost The city as a whole grew by 10.5 percent. The educational services and health care industry is the largest sector.$$ DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 26 WEST EXCELSIOR GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPhysical conditionsLand use + development Businesses + neighborhoods Mobility + access Parks + natural systems Current land uses: Retail and other commercial land uses are located between Colorado Avenue and Highway 100 with frontage on Excelsior Boulevard. These uses are surrounded by single family neighborhoods. Multifamily residential and office uses anchor the study area on the western end. Future land use: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan maintains commercial uses along Excelsior Boulevard for the majority of the gateway. A transition to High Density Residential between Dakota Avenue and Brunswick Avenue has been guided. Recent development: No major redevelopment has occurred recently within the gateway, though there are multiple sites (e.g., Party City) that have redevelopment potential. Infrastructure: The existing street network is well connected, with system of roadways and sidewalks. There are no dedicated bike facilities in the gateway. There are a total of four 4-legged intersections and six 3-legged intersections with Excelsior Boulevard. Bike and pedestrian mobility: Between 76-150 walkers and bikers travel along either side of Excelsior Boulevard each day. Pedestrian volumes are highest on Wooddale Avenue, Yosemite Avenue, Colorado Avenue, and Brunswick Avenue to connect to Excelsior Boulevard. Bicycle volumes are highest on Alabama Avenue and Xenwood Avenue. Access: There are a number of individual access points along Excelsior Boulevard, and they are generally spaced with one or two access points per block. Neighborhoods: The West Excelsior Gateway includes portions of the Elmwood, Brooklawns, Creekside, and Brookside neighborhoods. Employment centers: The hospital and office buildings in the northeast corner of Louisiana and Excelsior are identified as an employment center. Parcel utilization: There are a few commercial uses along the Excelsior Boulevard corridor that are well utilized where the improvement value is at least 75% of the property value. The initial redevelopment opportunities identified were identified as underutilized. Parks: Meadowbrook Park and the Golf Course are located on the western edge of the gateway. There are two areas to the south of the Highway 100 interchange that do not have access to a park within a reasonable walkshed. Natural systems: Areas directly adjacent to Excelsior Boulevard are primarily impervious surfaces (pavement and buildings). The surrounding neighborhoods have a larger tree canopy and neighborhood streets include boulevard trees. Wetlands: Minnehaha Creek is located on the western edge of the gateway, which is supported by green infrastructure. The creek continues to experience improvements and enhancements. DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 27 WEST EXCELSIOR GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYKey themesWest Excelsior Gateway Focus areas to explore: Big ideas to test: Commercial redevelopment along the corridor Compatibility with residential communities Reimaging Excelsior Boulevard (what is the identity) •Commercial redevelopment opportunity areas - what are the next opportunities. •Commercial development guidance that supports corridor destinations that also support the surrounding communities. •West Excelsior Boulevard - how does the roadway change. •Construction bicycle infrastructure and create connections to the northern station areas. •Redevelopment potential of Party City site •Redevelopment potential of Jessen Press site •Crossing Excelsior Blvd •N/S bike trails/transportation corridor •Sense of identity for commercial corridor The West Excelsior Gateway is an existing commercial corridor, where redevelopment can sustain small businesses and bring positive changes to the area. The community recognizes the appeal of smaller, community-oriented, and neighborhood-scale developments in the corridor. Redevelopment can prioritize people over cars to ensure that vehicular traffic, access, and parking are efficient without negatively impacting visitors and nearby residents. Redevelopments can respond to local needs by providing new housing, amenities, and services that bring life to the corridor and complement nearby neighborhoods. What is next?DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 28 WEST EXCELSIOR GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Big ideas to test:Ideas that will not be carried forward:The following ideas were either presented in the current study or identified during this process and will no long be considered for the West Excelsior Gateway. The following graphic will be updated to reflect the ideas and concepts identified by the Community Advisory Group and staff charrettes. What is next?Excelsior Blvd Excelsior Bl v dAlabama AveYosemite AveBrunswick AveCambridge St Hwy 100DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 29 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Wooddale Gateway Current Conditions Summary DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 30 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Policy conditionsWooddale Gateway area, looking north Wooddale Gateway area, looking northwest Wooddale Gateway area with 36th Street reconstruction, looking east Wooddale Gateway area, looking southeast Wooddale Ave Wooddale Ave Wooddale AveWooddale Ave Station Wooddale Ave Station PLACE Via Sol Village in the Park Alabama Ave Oxford St 36th St 36th St Cedar Lake TrailCurrent conditionsWooddale Gateway: June 2023 DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 31 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPolicy conditionsElmwood Area Land Use Transit, and Transportation Study Developed in 2003, the Elmwood Area Land Use, Transit, and Transportation Study provided a set of planning principles, a range of recommendations, and land use guiding recommendations for the Wooddale Gateway. The following outlines specific goals of the plan and the recent investments within the gateway area. Plan goals Illustrative plan: 2003 Redevelop opportunity sites for residential, office, and mixed-uses in line with future transit developments. Maintain or redevelop opportunity sites to support current and future job sectors. Redevelop opportunity sites for multimodal transit developments, such as park and rides. Improve pedestrian and bicycle accommodations to current and future amenities. Enhance the public realm by way of streetscaping and open space improvements. 4434 Executive SummarySTUDYAREA ILLUSTRATIVE PLAN Elmwood Area Land Use, Transit and Transportation Study Hennepin County Department of Housing, Community Works, and Transit City of St. Louis Park TH 7 TH 100W. 36th Street 37th Street W o o d d a l e A v e n u e Oxford Street Alabama AvenueXenwood AvenueLight R ail DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 32 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPolicy conditionsElmwood Area Land Use Transit, and Transportation Study The current plan lists a number of recommendations and actions that will assist the community in achieving the established goals for the Wooddale Station area. While progress has been made, there is still work to do. Land use + development: Multiple properties were redeveloped within the study area. Some sites were redeveloped in alignment with the future land use guidance of the plan (e.g., former McGarvey Coffee to PLACE Via Sol (217 units), while other areas redeveloped into thriving destinations, with slight variations from the land use guidance (e.g., Pechiney Plastics was guided for medium-density residential, but was redeveloped with an industrial use, the Johnny Pops site). Transit + Transit Oriented Development (TOD): Specific transit and transit oriented development recommendations were identified and completed within the study area: •Freight rail and Light Rail will be co-located on the existing rail line. •Mixed-use development is underway near the station with 315 units and 12,000 sf of commercial space proposed. •The station will be accessible by walking and biking, with no dedicated parking at the station. However, will be available with a parking structure at the Beltline station and surface parking at the Louisiana station. Mobility + access: A number of transportation investments have improved mobility in the gateway: •Reconstruction of Wooddale Avenue in 2022 with off-street trails and lane configuration improvements. •Interchange at TH 7 and Wooddale Avenue with frontage road improvements. •Cedar Lake Trail underpass of Wooddale Avenue (to open with light rail) •Cycle track construction on south side of 36th Street in 2022. •West 36th Street streetscape standards established with implementation of some improvements. What has been completed? 1.Highway 7 interchange and improvements, 2011 2.Wooddale Ave bikeway improvements, 2020 3.Via Sol apartments, 2022 4.Union Park Flats, 2024 5.Village in the Park condominiums and townhomes, 2006 6.36th Street reconstruction, 2022 7.OlyHi mixed-use development, 2025 8.Towerlight senior housing, 2012 9.Hoigaard Village mixed-use development, 2007 10.The Elmwood apartments, 2019 11.Firestation 1, 2011 12.Arbor House apartments, 2023 Wooddale Station 1 5 6 4 3 7 9 11 12 2Lake StWo o d d a l e A v e 36th St Hwy 100Hwy 78 10 Policy conditionsDRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 33 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1.Redevelopment Opportunity: Burlighton Coat Factory and Micro Center 2.Redevelopment Opportunity: Industrial and Commercial development between Xenwood Avenue and Yosemite Avenue 3.Extension of Wooddale Avenue with crossing over Highway 100 4.Inclusion of a median along Wooddale Avenue. 5.Oxford, Xenwood and Wooddale intersection 6.Xenwood Avenue underpassPolicy conditionsElmwood Area Land Use Transit, and Transportation Study Land use + development: All areas identified as opportunity sites have seen construction of new developments or have current proposals for redevelopment. A few additional sites may be considered for redevelopment based on current conditions include: •The Burlington Coat Factory and Micro Center site •Areas between Xenwood and Yosemite Avenues (north of 36th Street) Transit + Transit Oriented Development (TOD): No specific transit recommendations remain to be accomplished. Mobility + access: Although major changes occurred, a couple of recommendations were not completed as identified: •Extension of Wooddale to overpass Highway 100 was not completed and is unlikely due to development. A pedestrian/bicycle connection may still be possible. •A median was not included in the design for the reconstruction of Wooddale Avenue. •The Oxford, Xenwood, and Wooddale intersection has not been pursued until the redevelopment of the Micro Center site. •An Xenwood Avenue underpass of the rail line is not planned. What is left to accomplish? Wooddale Station 1 3 2 2Lake St36th St Hwy 100Hwy 76Wo o d d a l e A v e 4 5 DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 34 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYSocial conditionsPopulation Between 2010 and 2020, the population in census tracts in the Wooddale Gateway area changed between -6.3 percent and 22.4 percent (10.5 percent citywide). Age The median age for the Wooddale Gateway ranged from 32.4 to 34.4 years in 2021, representing a population that is an average of 1 year younger than the city as a whole. Housing In census tracts in the Wooddale Gateway area, the percentage of renter-occupied housing is between 12.0 percent and 71.9 percent (41.9 percent citywide). Employment & Income Between 2010 and 2020, the median household income in census tracts in the Wooddale Gateway area grew between 16.6 percent and 63.0 percent (39.7 percent citywide). Mobility 63%60% 56% Percentage of jobs in transportation, warehousing, and utilities Percentage of jobs in other services Percentage of jobs in public administration 8%47% 46% Percentage of households in the study area have access to two or more vehicles. Percentage of households in the study area have access to one vehicle. Percentage of households in the study area with no access to vehicles. Physical conditionsArrive + Thrive study area conditions Wooddale gateway conditions 10.4% 49% $1,923 $1,427 population growth from 2010 of all jobs in St. Louis Park are located in the study area median monthly mortgage cost median monthly rent cost The city as a whole grew by 10.5 percent. The educational services and health care industry is the largest sector.$$ DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 35 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPhysical conditionsLand use + development Businesses + neighborhoods Mobility + access Parks + natural systems Current land uses: There are a wide mix of current uses south of Highway 7 including industrial, retail, mixed-use and multifamily. Uses north of Highway 7 consist of primarily single family residential Future land use: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan includes a shift in land uses, including the designation of Transit Oriented Development (TOD) within the core study area, in addition to high and medium intensity residential. Land uses north of Highway 7 are maintained. Recent development: The Wooddale Gateway has experienced the largest areas of redevelopment and investment in the last 10 years, including residential and mixed use developments. Infrastructure: The existing street network is well connected with Wooddale serving as the single crossing of Highway 7 and 36th Street as the single Highway 100 crossing. A majority of the local streets have sidewalks on either side, with limited trails within the gateway. Bike and pedestrian mobility: Wooddale Avenue and 36th Street experience over 150 daily users individually. Wooddale Avenue experiences high volumes south of 36th Street to Oxford Street, consisting of mostly pedestrian movement (80% of travelers). Brunswick Avenue is highly utilized as a north/south route. Access: The street network is well connected, providing access to destinations within the gateway. Individual property access is managed well on higher volume roadways. Neighborhoods: The Wooddale Gateway includes portions of the Elmwood and Sorenson neighborhoods. Employment centers: The commercial area in the southeast quadrant of the 36th Street and Highway 100 interchange is identified as a commercial center. Parcel utilization: Parcels within the study area are generally highly utilized, likely as a result of recent development. The Micro Center site is the largest underutilized parcel. Neighborhoods are generally utilized well, with scattered underutilized parcels. Parks: Jorvig Park is the only city park located within the gateway, though Webster Park is located just to the northeast. All areas are located within a half mile walk-shed to a park. Natural systems: The Wooddale Gateway study area consists of primarily impervious surfaces (pavement and buildings). The surrounding neighborhoods have a larger tree canopy and neighborhood streets include boulevard trees. Wetlands: There are limited wetlands within the gateway. DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 36 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYKey themesWooddale Gateway Focus areas to explore: Big ideas to test: Housing redevelopment and the missing middle Optimization of roadways and public realm infrastructure Travel demand management for new and existing multifamily “Getting over” Highway 7 •Designation of housing opportunity areas north of Highway 7 in the Sorenson Neighborhood. •Parking and amenity offerings at multifamily to encourage transit usage. •Land bridge over Highway 7. •Pedestrian crossing of Highway 100 at 36th Street. •Greening of commercial and employment area with boulevard and site landscaping. •Connectivity to Historic Walker Lake and neighborhoods to the north •Overcoming the gap between highway 100 and the Rec Center on 36th Street •Redevelopment potential of Burlington/MicroCenter site •Redevelopment potential of former Johnny Pops site The Wooddale Gateway has seen the greatest amount of recent development, with reported successes, ideas for improvement, and signs of emerging redevelopment opportunities. Housing within the area includes a variety of densities and the community recognizes services included in recent apartment developments and has ideas for modest improvements that would create better experiences for all modes of travel and ideas for new parks and green spaces. The community also recognizes a need to build connections across Highway 7, where conditions suggest new opportunities for residential redevelopment in the Sorenson Neighborhood. What is next?DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 37 WOODDALE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Big ideas to test:Ideas that will not be carried forward:The following ideas were either presented in the current study or identified during this process and will no long be considered for the Wooddale Gateway. The following graphic will be updated to reflect the ideas and concepts identified by the Community Advisory Group and staff charrettes. What is next?Wooddale StationLake St36th St Hwy 100Hwy 7Wo o d d a l e A v e DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 38 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Beltline Gateway Current Conditions Summary DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 39 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Policy conditionsCurrent conditionsBeltline Gateway: June 2023 Beltline Gateway area, looking southwest Beltline Gateway area, looking south Beltline Gateway area, looking northwest Beltline Gateway area, looking southwest Beltline Ave Station Beltline Ave Station Beltline Ave Station Beltline Ave Beltline Ave Beltline Ave St. Louis Park Rec Center Beltline Ave Cedar Lake Trail Cedar Lake Trail Bass Lake Bass Lake Bass Lake DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 40 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPolicy conditionsBeltline Area Framework + Design Guidelines Developed in 2012, the Beltline Area Framework and Design Guidelines provided a set of planning principles, a range of recommendations, and land use guiding recommendations for the Beltline Gateway. The following outlines specific goals of the plan and the recent investments within the gateway area. Plan goals Potential Connectivity & Access Diagram: 2012 Create a unique sense of identity by weaving together the distinct Beltline districts. Increase street connectivity and mobility and prioritize pedestrian and bike accessibility. Foster the Beltline area as a growing regional employment center. Capture the value of high quality public transit by optimizing transit oriented development, economic development, and neighborhood- scaled amenities around a convenient, safe, and pleasant transit center. Create a connected network of great public parks and spaces. Manage parking effectively to include park and rides, drop- off zones, on-street parking, and user-friendly bike parking facilities. FramEwork - viSion PAGE 17 City of St. LouiS Park - BeLtLine area DeSign guiDeLineS Figure 2.4: Potential Connectivity & Access Diagram The Beltline area has a wealth of recreational and green space amenities, including Bass Lake Preserve, Cedar Lake Regional Trail, Wolfe Park, Carpenter Park/Skippy Field, and Lilac Park. Future development patterns are guided to improve the creation of a linked “Chain of Parks” system of green spaces and recreational destinations. Establishing a unique identity for the Beltline Area is an important element of the future land use and development pattern. Four street gateway areas are envisioned for the Beltline area at Beltline Blvd/TH 7 (west), Minnetonka Blvd/CSAH 25 (east), Beltline Blvd/36th Street (south), and Ottawa/Minnetonka Blvd (north). The most important locations for creating the Beltline area’s unique identity are along Beltline Boulevard, CSAH 25, around the future Beltline Transit Station, and at the four gateway areas. Connectivity & Access PatternsOne of the major challenges of the Beltline Area is its poor connectivity and access. Barriers to connectivity include the existing rail line, CSAH 25’s layout as a divided highway and frontage roads, limited north-south streets, extremely large “blocks”, and Bass Lake Preserve. In general, it is very challenging to travel north-south within the Beltline area with only one option available – Beltline Boulevard. Although east-west travel is better, it is also limited especially south of the rail line/Cedar Lake Regional Trail. Park Glen Road dead-ends both east and west of Beltline Boulevard. In general, the Beltline area should evolve into a walk/ bike-friendly area that makes it very convenient and safe to get to the future Beltline Transit Station as well as Beltline’s many other destinations. A significantly expanded pedestrian and bicycle network will be needed including sidewalks, bike lanes, and multi-use trails. The function and convenience of the Cedar Lake Trail for non-motorized recreation and transportation should be preserved and enhanced, if possible, as part of the Southwest LRT project. Thinking about Bass Lake Preserve Rec Center / Wolfe Park Fern Hill Park Carpenter Park/Skippy Field Minikahda Vista Park LILAC PARK Webster Park Bass Lake Park Sunshine Park Town Green Park 28TH FRANCEHIGHW A Y 7 EXCEL SI O R 29TH 35T H 38TH MINNETONKA KIPLINGOTTAWABELT L INE 36TH 37THUTICA36 1/2 HIGHWAY 100PARK GL E N LYNNGLENHURST31STJOPPA WEBSTERSALEM40THTOLEDO NATCHEZSUNSETVERNONQUENTIN VALLAC H E R M O N T E R E Y 39THRALEIGH INGLEWOOD34TH WOLFEPRINCETON HUNTINGTON33RD RANDAL L PARK CENTERPARK C O M M O N S GRANDLAKEMINIKAHDAWOODDALEPARK NICOLLETAUTO CLUB SERVICE MERID IANUTICA AVE S TO SB HWY100 SPRIVATEJOPPAINGLEWOODSALEMRALEIGHGLENHURSTPRINCETON FRANCEHIGHWAY 100HUNTINGTONOTTAWAHIGHWA Y 7 MONTEREYLYNNWEBSTER39THMONTEREY28THGLENHURSTSALEM NATCHEZHIGHW A Y 7 WEBSTERJOPPAQUENTINTOLEDOUTICAHUNTINGTONLYNNHIGHW A Y 7 31ST NATCHEZPRINCETONLYNNGLENHURSTMONTEREY 31ST RALEIGH36TH INGLEWOODBass Lake Preserve Rec Center / Wolfe Park Fern Hill Park Carpenter Park/Skippy Field Minikahda Vista Park LILAC PARK Webster Park Bass Lake Park Sunshine Park Town Green Park 28TH FRANCEHIGHW A Y 7 EXCEL SI O R 29TH 35T H 38TH MINNETONKA KIPLINGOTTAWABELT L INE 36TH 37THUTICA36 1/2 HIGHWAY 100PARK GL E N LYNNGLENHURST31STJOPPA WEBSTERSALEM40THTOLEDO NATCHEZSUNSETVERNONQUENTIN VALLAC H E R M O N T E R E Y 39THRALEIGH INGLEWOOD34TH WOLFEPRINCETON HUNTINGTON33RD RANDAL L PARK CENTER PARK C O M M O N S GRANDLAKEMINIKAHDAWOODDALEPARK NICOLLETAUTO C L U B SERVICE MERID IANUTICA AVE S TO SB HWY100 SPRIVATEJOPPAINGLEWOODSALEMRALEIGHGLENHURSTPRINCETON FRANCEHIGHWAY 100HUNTINGTONOTTAWAHIGHWA Y 7 MONTEREYLYNNWEBSTER39THMONTEREY28THGLENHURSTSALEM NATCHEZHIGHW A Y 7 WEBSTERJOPPAQUENTINTOLEDOUTICAHUNTINGTONLYNNHIGHW A Y 7 31ST NATCHEZPRINCETONLYNNGLENHURSTMONTEREY 31ST RALEIGH36TH INGLEWOODSTATION AREA PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL MINOR ARTERIAL COLLECTOR POTENTIAL STREET CONNECITON TRAIL SIDEWALKS POTENTIAL BUS SHUTTLE Cedar L a k e Tr ail SW LR T Li n e DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 41 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPolicy conditionsBeltline Station Area Framework + Design Guidelines The current plan lists a number of recommendations and actions that will assist the community in achieving the established goals for the Beltline Station area. While progress has been made, there is still work to do. Land use + development: A few key actions have been completed to support the plan’s land use recommendations: •Employment oriented areas between Highway 7 and 36th Street have been rezoned to support development needs •The City of St. Louis Park support the design of the Beltline Station. •Individual sites along County Highway 25 have been redeveloped. Mobility + access: A number of transportation investments have improved mobility in the gateway: •Bike facilities were constructed on Beltline Boulevard from 26th to CSAH 25. •A conceptual roadway design layout was completed for CSAH 25 with Hennepin County. •The Beltline and CSAH 25 intersection and the LRT intersection are under construction. What has been completed? 1.Beltline Boulevard and Ottowa Ave bikeway and intersection improvements 2.Nordic Ware manufacturing expansions, 2022 3.Sherman mixed-use transit-oriented development, 2023 construction start 4.General Office Products lease ending, presenting an opportunity for new mixed-use transit-oriented development 5.Corsa mixed-use development, 2023 6.Risor mixed-use development, 2023 7.Self-storage facility rezoned for residential development, redevelopment and/or future connection opportunity.Policy conditionsBeltline Station 2 1 1 3 5 7 6 4 Beltline BlvdCSAH 25 Bass Lake DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 42 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY 1.Transit Overlay 2.CSAH 25 Improvements 3.Park Glen Road cul-de-sac connections to the street netowrkPolicy conditionsBeltline Station Area Framework + Design Guidelines Land use + development: Limited redevelopment opportunities were identified in the plan. The following policy or guidance recommendations have yet to be completed: •Create a transit station area overlay. •Consider a detailed redevelopment study for CSAH 25. •Continue rezoning employment-oriented development to align with their needs. Mobility + access: While many improvements were made, the following recommendations have yet to be implemented: •Implementation of the CSAH z25 Conceptual Roadway Layout. •Street connections and transportation improvements identified in the plan. What is left to accomplish? 1 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 Beltline BlvdCSAH 25 Bass Lake Beltline Station DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 43 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYSocial conditionsPopulation Between 2010 and 2020, the population in census tracts in the Beltline Gateway area grew by between -6.5 percent and 22.4 percent (10.5 percent citywide). Age The median age for the Beltline Gateway ranged from 32.7 to 39.2 years in 2021, representing the youngest and oldest census tracts for the study area. Housing In census tracts in the Beltline Gateway area, the percentage of renter-occupied housing is between 43.0 percent and 71.9 percent (41.9 percent citywide). Employment & Income Between 2010 and 2020, the median household income in census tracts in the Beltline Gateway area grew between 16.6 percent and 49.0 percent (39.7 percent citywide). Mobility 63% 60% 56% Percentage of jobs in transportation, warehousing, and utilities Percentage of jobs in other services Percentage of jobs in public administration 8% 47% 46% Percentage of households in the study area have access to two or more vehicles. Percentage of households in the study area have access to one vehicle. Percentage of households in the study area with no access to vehicles. Physical conditionsArrive + Thrive study area conditions Beltline gateway conditions 10.4% 49% $1,923 $1,427 population growth from 2010 of all jobs in St. Louis Park are located in the study area median monthly mortgage cost median monthly rent cost The city as a whole grew by 10.5 percent. The educational services and health care industry is the largest sector.$$ DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 44 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYPhysical conditionsLand use + development Businesses + neighborhoods Mobility + access Parks + natural systems Current land uses: The primary land uses include Industrial and multifamily. Areas north of CSAH 25 include a range of commercial and mixed residential. Future land use: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides Transit Oriented development north of the Beltline Boulevard station and business park in other locations. Many of the residential uses remain unchanged. Recent development: Recent development has been centered on the Beltline Boulevard corridor. Infrastructure: The existing street network is not well connected, with limited opportunities to move throughout the gateway by personal vehicle, bicycle, or pedestrian. CSAH 25,the LRT corridor, and Bass Lake create barriers for moving within the gateway, along with a lack of connections with Park Glen Road. Bike and pedestrian mobility: Trails are a highly utilized feature within the Beltline Gateway. Other than the facilities along Beltline Boulevard, walkers and bikers utilize trails or features more frequently. The highest pedestrian volumes are on Beltline Boulevard from CSAH 25 to Park Glen on the eastern edge, with the presence of the regional trail detour in place when data was collected. Access: Individual property access does not generally present concerns within the study area. Neighborhoods: The Beltline Gateway includes portions of the Wolfe Park and Triangle neighborhoods. Employment centers: The Beltline Gateway is identified an employment area and nodes of neighborhood commercial are present north of CSAH 25. Parcel utilization: Areas west of Beltline Boulevard were identified as poorly utilized, but are active uses with recent investment. The Park Glen Apartments are among the most highly utilized. Parks: Carpenter Park is located within the gateway. The Recreation Center and the ROC are also located in this gateway, providing a range of year-round recreational offerings and events. All areas are located within a half mile walk-shed to a park. Natural systems: The Beltline Gateway study area consists of primarily impervious surfaces (pavement and buildings). The surrounding neighborhoods have a larger tree canopy and neighborhood streets include boulevard trees. Wetlands: Bass Lake is located within the southwest quadrant of the study area, which is supported by green infrastructure. This area is also prone to overland flooding and must be monitored in heavy rainfall events. DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 45 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARYKey themesBeltline Gateway Focus areas to explore: Big ideas to test: 35th Street and Raleigh Avenue commercial district strategy and placemaking Travel demand management for new and existing multi family Optimization of roadways and public realm infrastructure Connections to open spaces and community amenities and create a central organizing feature •Introduction of street level commercial uses that provide employee based amenities that encourage movement throughout the gateway. •Continued support of existing industrial uses, with opportunities for reinvestment if the opportunity arises. •Preserve affordable housing options currently available within the gateway. •Enhance connections and experiences with natural resources the study area. •Improve trail and sidewalk connectivity. •Establishing a green corridor from Bass Lake to the west •Street connections for the two Park Glen Road cul-de-sacs •Connecting across CSAH 25 / realizing the “urban blvd” goal for the road •Redevelopment potential of the mini-storage site •Redevelopment direction of business park/commercial/ industrial area around 35th street Of the four gateway areas, the Beltline Gateway has seen the least amount of private redevelopment in the last 20 years, but it has been transformed by public investment in infrastructure and Minnehaha Creek corridor. Future redevelopment of this commercial and industrial area will need to take a balanced approach to appreciate and improve nearby amenities. Redevelopment can provide safe and convenient connections between public transit, Methodist Hospital, nearby neighborhoods, and parks and natural areas. Redevelopments can also foster positive relationships with nearby amenities, such as Minnehaha Creek, to sustain those resources for future generations. What is next?DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 46 BELTLINE GATEWAY CURRENT CONDITIONS SUMMARY Big ideas to test:Ideas that will not be carried forward:The following ideas were either presented in the current study or identified during this process and will no long be considered for the Beltline Gateway. The following graphic will be updated to reflect the ideas and concepts identified by the Community Advisory Group and staff charrettes. What is next?Beltline Station Beltline BlvdCSAH 2 5 Bass Lake DRAFT - Oct 2023 Page 47 Big ideas to test: Additional Considerations: Where: Development along Oxford Street and Lake Street (West of Louisiana Avenue) Where: Meadowbrook/Era development Where: Either side of Oxford Street within the gateway Where: Multiple opportunities throughout the gateway Questions to consider: •What uses would support employment in the area (e.g., retail, sales, restaurants)? •Can some existing business uses be changed for residential development? •What active ground floor uses can be located along Oxford Street to activate the corridor and support walking, bike, and driving in the area. Questions to consider: •How can the affordable housing available within the Era development be preserved? •What improvements or reinvestments could be considered? •How can the development be better connected to surrounding neighborhoods? Questions to consider: How can the street level be activated to promote movement, understanding the varied modes that use Oxford? Questions to consider: What are the key connections that need to be made? •Era development to the north and east •Neighborhoods to Louisiana Ave Station •Methodist Hospital to Louisiana Ave Station •Walker Lake across Highway 7 Redevelopment Opportunities Affordable Housing Oxford St Activation Circulation • Introduction of street level commercial uses that provide employee based amenities that encourage movement throughout the gateway. •Should the street network identified in the current Louisiana Station Area Framework plan be carried forward? •Continued support of existing industrial uses, with opportunities for reinvestment if the opportunity arises. •Enhance connections and experiences with natural resources the study area. •Improve trail and sidewalk connectivity. •How to connect light rail area to Methodist Hospital (new streets, shuttle, bike/ped connections?) •General approach to parking lot conversion to development or green space •Regional stormwater facility that also acts as green space/public space •Connectivity to Historic Walker Lake •Connection between existing parks and green spaces (including future MCWD connections to Blake Rd Station development) •Preserving naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) within Meadowbrook/Era •Redevelopment approach for industrial areas Primary Redevelopment Opportunities Additional Redevelopment Opportunity Areas Affordable Housing Opportunity Area Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Opportunities Vehicular Circulation Opportunities Green Line Extension Bike Routes & Trails Legend: Louisiana Station Hwy 7 Lake St Walker St Cedar L a k e Tr ail CreeksidePark Methodist Hospital St. Louis Park High School Loffler Companies JorvigPark LouisianaOaks Park Oxford St Oxford St Brunswick Ave L ouisia n a A v e M innehaha CreekLouisiana GatewayLouisiana Gateway Page 48 Big ideas to test: Additional Considerations:Where: West Excelsior Boulevard Where: Properties with frontage on West Excelsior Boulevard Where: Multiple opportunities throughout the gateway Where: Multiple opportunities throughout the gateway Questions to consider: As a Hennepin County roadway, what is the position of exploring/identifying segment or spot improvements within the study area? Questions to consider: • What is the scale of neighborhood commercial development (i.e., how many stories, intensity of use)? • Should we allow housing to replace some commercial sites along Excelsior Boulevard, between important commercial nodes, to replace the long commercial strip and support remaining commercial businesses? • What is the transition between commercial redevelopment and the establish neighborhoods.Questions to consider: • What are the access and parking standards for new development along the corridor? • Is a district parking model appropriate?Questions to consider: • Can Brunswick Ave be considered for bike infrastructure improvements to facilitate a north/south connect? • What is the priority for improving the existing Highway 100 underpass south of Excelsior Blvd? West Excelsior Blvd Design Commercial Redevelopment Opportunities Parking and Access Multimodal Circulation • Commercial redevelopment opportunity areas - what are the next opportunities. • Commercial development guidance that supports corridor destinations that also support the surrounding communities. • West Excelsior Boulevard - how does the roadway change? • Build bicycle infrastructure and create connections to the northern station areas. • Redevelopment potential of Party City site • Redevelopment potential of Jessen Press site • Crossing Excelsior Blvd • N/S bike trails/transportation corridor • Sense of identity for commercial corridor Party City Jessen Press West Excelsior GatewayWest Excelsior Gateway Louisiana AveMeadowbrook Golf Course West Excelsior Blvd Hwy 10042nd St 39th Street Brunswick AveColorado AveAlabama AveYosemite AveMethodist Hospital Legend: Neighborhood Commercial Redevelopment Opportunities Neighborhood Commercial Nodes Additional Redevelopment Opportunities Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Opportunities Green Line Extension Bike Routes & Trails Page 49 Big ideas to test: Additional Considerations: Where: Burlington Coat Factory Site, NordicWare/former Johnny Pops building Where: Multiple opportunities throughout the gateway Where: Highway 100 at 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Questions to consider: • This gateway has seen a lot of redevleopment in recent years. What does redevelopment of these remaining sites look like? • For the redevelopment of the larger sites, what is the overall scale of redevelopment? • For the Burlington Coat Factory Site, how can we make connections through the site? Questions to consider: • What do green corridors look like within a mostly redeveloped area? • What are the opportunities beyond boulevard plantings? Questions to consider: • How can the bike/pedestrian infrastructure/ experience at the 36th St crossing be improved? • Is a bike/pedestrian crossing at Wooddale Ave/ Cambridge Ave still desired? Redevelopment Opportunities Green Corridors Highway 100 • Future investment opportunities north of Highway 7 in the Sorenson Neighborhood identified as an area of further study. • Parking and amenity offerings at multifamily housing to encourage transit usage. • Though improvements have been made to Wooddale Ave, Highway 7 and the railroad remain as barriers to north and south movement. • Pedestrian crossing of Highway 100 at 36th Street. • Greening of commercial and employment area with boulevard and site landscaping. • Connectivity to Historic Walker Lake and neighborhoods to the north • Overcoming the gap between Highway 100 and the Rec Center on 36th Street • Redevelopment potential of Burlington/MicroCenter site • Redevelopment potential of former Johnny Pops site Where: Multiple opportunities throughout the gateway Questions to consider: • How can connections across Highway 100 be improved? • How can destinations within the gateway be better connected? • What street network improvements or connections are needed? Circulation Burlington Coat Factory Former Johnny Pops Wooddale GatewayWooddale Gateway Legend: Redevelopment Opportunities Green Corridor Opportunities Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Opportunities Vehicular Circulation Opportunities Green Line Extension Bike Routes & Trails Wooddale Station Ped/Bike Only W o o d d a l e A v e Hwy 7 Cedar L ak e Tr ail Lake St34th St WebsterPark LilacPark 36th St Cambridge StAlabama AveBrunswick AveHwy 100St. Louis Park High School Central Community Center Page 50 Big ideas to test: Additional Considerations: Where: Raleigh Ave and 35th St; Station Area; Mini Storage Where: CSAH 25 and Minnetonka Blvd Where: Multiple opportunities throughout the gateway Where: Multiple opportunities throughout the gateway Questions to consider: • What are the desired uses for this area? • What uses are needed to support nearby residential neighborhoods? • How can development capitalize on the recent residential developments, serving as a catalyst for development? Questions to consider: • How do we push the vision for corridor improvements with Hennepin County as redevelopment occurs and roadway projects are built? Questions to consider: • How can green corridors and infrastructure connect uses to Bass Lake and other natural features? • What does a green boulevard include in a redevelopment area? • How can the tree canopy be improved? • How do we reduce the amount of impervious surfaces? Questions to consider: What are the key connections that need to be made? • Park Glen Rd Cul-de-sacs • Pedestrian crossing of CSAH 25 Redevelopment Opportunities CSAH 25 Improvements Green Corridors Circulation • Introduction of street level commercial uses that provide employee based amenities that encourage movement throughout the gateway. •Are there any opportunities to enhance the civic center campus and neighborhood north of County Highway 25? •Continued support of existing industrial uses, with opportunities for reinvestment if the opportunity arises. •Preserve affordable housing options currently available within the gateway. •Enhance connections and experiences with natural resources within the study area. •Improve trail and sidewalk connectivity. •Establishing a green corridor from Bass Lake to the west •Street connections for the two Park Glen Road cul-de-sacs •Connecting across CSAH 25 / realizing the “urban blvd” goal for the road •Redevelopment potential of the mini-storage site •Redevelopment direction of business park/commercial/industrial area around 35th street Melrose Center Corsa Mixed-Use Development Risor Mixed-Use Development 36th St Beltline GatewayBeltline Gateway Beltline Station County Hi g h w a y 2 5 Beltline BlvdCedar L ak e Tr ailHwy 100Minnetonka Blvd CarpenterPark St. Louis ParkCity Hall Bass Lake Bass LakePark Nordic Ware Legend: 35th & Raleigh Redevelopment Opportunities Station Area Redevelopment Opportunities Additional Redevelopment Opportunities Green Corridor Opportunities Bike/Pedestrian Circulation Opportunities Vehicular Circulation Opportunities Green Line Extension Bike Routes & Trails Page 51 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Discussion item: 2 Executive summary Title: May 21 and June 3, 2022 final watermain break budget report Recommended action: No action required. Policy consideration: Does council support staff’s recommendation to transfer the excess funds designated for the watermain break program back to the general fund? Summary: On Saturday May 21 and June 3, 2022, a 12-inch watermain ruptured and caused water to flow through the sanitary sewer, emerging in the basements of nearby homes. Both breaks occurred in the same 20-foot section of watermain along Minnetonka Avenue; this entire 20-foot section of pipe was removed and replaced. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) determined that the May 21 incident fell under the Sewer Back Up portion of the city’s elected coverage of No-Fault Sewer Back Up and Water Main Break Coverage, which has a $2 million per occurrence limit, and up to $40,000 per affected property. The LMCIT coverage is secondary to any other homeowners or property insurance coverage residents may have available. In recognition of the unprecedented nature of the event and resulting damage of private property, council approved a city reimbursement program of up to $80,000 for qualifying expenses for properties impacted by both the May 21 and June 3 watermain breaks and up to $60,000 for properties impacted by the May 21 watermain break only. Financial or budget considerations: The council transferred $1.5 million of general fund balance to the insurance fund and appropriated $1.5 million of ARPA funds to fund these programs. The total program cost is expected to be $1,027,100. Staff outlines recommendations to transfer the excess funds back to the general fund in the report. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Marney Olson, housing supervisor Amelia Cruver, finance director Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 2) Page 2 Title: May 21 and June 3, 2022 final watermain break budget report Discussion Background: On Saturday May 21, 2022, a 12-inch watermain ruptured and the force of the watermain break ruptured a nearby manhole. Water flowed through the sanitary sewer, emerging in the basements of nearby homes. On June 3, 2022, St. Louis Park crews responded to a watermain break between Texas and Sumter avenues south on Minnetonka Boulevard. Both this break and the May 21 break occurred in the same 20-foot section of watermain; this entire 20-foot section of pipe was removed and replaced. The League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) determined that the May 21 incident fell under the Sewer Back Up portion of the city’s elected coverage of No-Fault Sewer Back Up and Water Main Break Coverage, which has a $2 million per occurrence limit, and up to $40,000 per affected property. The LMCIT insurance is secondary to any other homeowners or property insurance coverage residents may have available. In recognition of the unprecedented nature of the event and resulting damage of private property, council approved a city reimbursement program of up to $80,000 for qualifying expenses for properties impacted by both the May 21 and June 3 watermain breaks and up to $60,000 for properties impacted by the May 21 watermain break. Residents requesting these funds first needed to exhaust personal homeowners coverage and LMCIT coverage. The council also allocated up to $75,000 at 2% interest for commercial properties utilizing the existing city reimbursement fund. No commercial properties utilized the 2% interest loan. Reimbursement program activities and deliverables: Staff created a city reimbursement program for eligible expenses that exceed what’s received from homeowners’ insurance coverage and the LMCIT insurance coverage for properties impacted by the May 21 and June 3 watermain breaks. Berkley Risk was contracted by the city to administer the city reimbursement program in conjunction with housing and finance staff. Applications for reimbursement were required to be submitted within 60 days of the date LMCIT closed the property owner’s claim. The final deadline to apply for the city reimbursement program was December 31, 2022. Eligible homeowners had 180 days from the date the LMCIT closed their claim to submit receipts/invoices for reimbursement through the city reimbursement program. The city reimbursement program ended August 1, 2023. Homeowners that had an open claim as of July 5, 2023, received a second reminder of the August 1 deadline and were instructed to apply for an extension, if needed, by August 1. 32 property owners accessed the city reimbursement program. Four homeowners that were working with a contractor and still had remaining work in progress requested an extension before the August 1 deadline. Three projects are still in process. The contract with Berkley Risk ended August 31, 2023, and the remaining homeowners will work with housing staff to close out their claims. Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 2) Page 3 Title: May 21 and June 3, 2022 final watermain break budget report May 21/June 3 watermain city reimbursement program 54 Impacted properties 42 Claims filed and closed with LMCIT and eligible to apply for the city reimbursement program 36 Applications received for the city reimbursement program by the deadline 32 Property owners that accessed the city reimbursement program 29 Properties that have received reimbursement and closed their application with the program 3 Property owners continuing to work with staff to close out their application Program financial update: The total cost of the city reimbursement program is expected to be no greater than $1,027,100. This includes the three properties that still have work in progress and just over $20,000 in administrative costs paid to Berkley Risk. The city appropriated $1.5 million of ARPA funds to fund these programs and an additional $1.5 million of fund balance from the General Fund. After closing out the program, total spending will be no more than $1,027,100. In closing out the program, staff has the following plans: 1. Add the remaining appropriated ARPA funds ($721,000) to the revenue replacement spending category and transfer them to the general fund in 2024 for use on core government services. This would update the action council took on ARPA funds earlier this summer and will free up a corresponding amount of general fund dollars to be used on one-time needs. 2. Transfer the unused $1.2 million of fund balance from the insurance fund back to the general fund. Recommendations on usage for all of these one-time funds will be incorporated into the 2024 budget conversation on November 27. It is anticipated that recommendations will focus on capital projects, including underground infrastructure, and providing reliable and affordable city services. Next steps: Staff will continue to work with the remaining three property owners to close out their application. If council supports the financial plan outlined above, staff will prepare resolutions to transfer funds at an upcoming council meeting. Further recommendations on allocation of these funds will be included as part of the revised 2024 budget that council will review in November. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: October 16, 2023 Written report: 3 Executive summary Title: Wooddale Station development update – Ward 2 Recommended action: None at this time. Policy consideration: Does the EDA wish to pursue redevelopment of the Wooddale Station site? Summary: The St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (EDA) has been informed by Saturday Properties that it will no longer be able to proceed with its Wooddale Avenue Station (OlyHi) development proposed at 5950 and 5802 W 36th Street due to insurmountable, adverse market conditions. Please see the attached letter from Saturday Properties to the EDA. Staff will be seeking a new developer to prepare an alternative development proposal for the EDA-owned site consistent with the city’s vision. That vision includes an active, vibrant, and connected development where people can affordably live, work, and recreate with the opportunities and advantages of proximity to LRT, will further facilitate the city’s five strategic priorities, and achieves the EDA’s vision for the site, which includes: • An abundance of affordable multifamily housing that exceeds the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy requirements and facilitates multicultural and intergenerational living (i.e., includes larger size units); • Smaller scale, affordable, ground floor commercial spaces conducive for neighborhood businesses; • Attractive, bold, and creative architecture; • Building and site designs that incorporate numerous “green” elements including renewable energy sources and serve as a showcase for environmental sustainability; • Numerous accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and automobiles, including electric bikes, electric vehicles, and possibly car sharing; • A public plaza or community space with unique community landmark or feature; • High quality site amenities and public art; • Connections to nature through green features such as enhanced landscaping, green roofs or living wall systems. Staff will be reaching out to qualified developers requesting development proposals for the site. Staff will provide an update to the EDA once a new developer is identified. Financial or budget considerations: None at this time. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion; letter from Saturday Properties to the EDA Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, redevelopment administrator Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, economic development manager Karen Barton, community development director/EDA executive director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3) Page 2 Title: Wooddale Station development update – Ward 2 Discussion Site information: The Southwest LRT Wooddale Avenue Station site (5950 36th St. W.) is located at the northeast corner of 36th Street West and Wooddale Avenue South in the Elmwood neighborhood. The 1.68-acre site consists of a single property owned by the city’s Economic Development Authority (EDA) which abuts the planned SWLRT Wooddale Station platform to the north. The site is currently occupied by a vacant 16,700 square foot commercial building and an excess municipal parking lot. Immediately adjacent to the station site to the east is a 1.4-acre parcel owned by Standal Properties. It is occupied by a one-story, multi-tenant commercial building and parking lot. SWLRT Wooddale Avenue Station site and adjacent property Background: The SWLRT Wooddale Avenue Station site has been planned to be an active, vibrant, and connected place where people can affordably live, work and recreate with the opportunities and advantages of proximity to LRT for more than 20 years. At the February 10, 2020, study session the EDA envisioned the site as an important community hub for mixed- income housing, neighborhood business and transit. Accordingly, the EDA issued a request for 5950 36th St. W 5802 36th St. W Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3) Page 3 Title: Wooddale Station development update – Ward 2 proposals (RFP) in July 2020 for a qualified developer to construct a development that provides the following: • An abundance of affordable multifamily housing that exceeds the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy requirements and facilitates multicultural and intergenerational living (i.e. includes larger size units); • Smaller scale, affordable, ground floor commercial spaces conducive for neighborhood businesses; • Attractive, bold, and creative architecture; • Building and site designs that incorporate numerous “green” elements including renewable energy sources and serve as a showcase for environmental sustainability; • Numerous accommodations for pedestrians, bicyclists, transit riders, and automobiles, including electric bikes, electric vehicles, and possibly car sharing; • A public plaza or community space with unique community landmark or feature; • High quality site amenities and public art; • Connections to nature through green features such as enhanced landscaping, green roofs or living wall systems. The EDA also sought a development proposal that seamlessly integrates with the adjacent SWLRT Wooddale Avenue Station and connects to the surrounding Elmwood neighborhood. At the December 14, 2020, study session, the EDA determined that Saturday Properties/Anderson Companies’ (“developers”) proposal most closely aligned with the city’s vision, development objectives and preferred programming for the site. Subsequently, the EDA entered into a preliminary development agreement with the developers on February 16, 2021. The EDA received a staff report on November 22, 2021 outlining Wooddale Station LLC’s application for tax increment financing (TIF) and staff’s recommendation for $12.18 million in such assistance. The developers then secured a purchase agreement for the adjacent 5802 36th Street West property and staff worked with consulting firm LHB to complete a blight analysis of the subject properties. A first amendment to the preliminary development agreement was approved by the EDA in March 2022 allowing city staff and development team additional time to reach a mutually acceptable purchase and redevelopment agreement. City staff and the developers subsequently negotiated proposed business terms for the agreement. The developers received city approvals for a preliminary and final plat and a preliminary and final PUD for the development in August 2022. In January 2023, the EDA received a report outlining the negotiated business terms that would be included in the purchase agreement and contract for private development. The developers and staff negotiated a final contract in 2023, however increased construction costs, in conjunction with rising interest rates, tighter lending standards, and private investor reluctance have made the project financially infeasible at this time. Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3) Page 4 Title: Wooddale Station development update – Ward 2 Present considerations: On September 29, 2023, the EDA was informed by Saturday Properties that it will no longer be able to proceed with the Wooddale Avenue Station development proposed at 5950 and 5802 W 36th Street due to insurmountable, adverse market conditions. Attached is the letter from Saturday Properties to the EDA. Next steps: Staff will be reaching out to qualified developers to seek an alternative development proposal consistent with the city’s vision for the site. Staff will provide an update to the EDA once a new developer is identified. September 28th, 2023 To: Karen Barton <KBarton@stlouisparkmn.gov> Re: Project Update – Wooddale Station, LLC Dear Karen, We regret to inform you that Wooddale Station, LLC is unable to proceed with the Wooddale Station project as a result of unforeseen market conditions. We want to express our gratitude to the individuals and entities that played a role in the entitlement process. City Staff, Planning Commission, City Council, and all other groups and organizations involved played a critical role in supporting the shared vision for the project. We greatly appreciate the participation as we worked through a process that featured creative ways to reach groups that are not typically included. Although circumstances prevent us from continuing with this specific project, we remain enthusiastic about exploring future projects with the City of St. Louis Park. Please feel free to reach out with any questions or inquiries. As active members of the St. Louis Park community, we are eager to assist the city in any way possible. Sincerely, Mark Laverty Wooddale Station, LLC CC: Greg Hunt <GHunt@stlouisparkmn.gov> Jennifer Monson <JMonson@stlouisparkmn.gov> Special study session meeting of October 16, 2023 (Item No. 3) Title: Wooddate Station development update - Ward 2 Page 5