Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023/05/03 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - Planning Commission - Regular Planning commission meeting May 3, 2023 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther at 952.924.2574 or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission The St. Louis Park Planning Commission is meeting in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., in accordance with the most recent COVID-19 guidelines. Some members of the planning commission may participate by electronic device or telephone rather than by being personally present at the meeting. Members of the public can attend the planning commission meeting in person or watch the meeting by webstream at bit.ly/watchslppc and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17 and HD channel 859). Visit bit.ly/slppcagendas to view the agenda and reports. Due to technical challenges, courtesy call-in public comment is not available for this meeting. You can provide comment on agenda items in person at the council meeting or by emailing your comments to info@stlouispark.org by noon the day of the meeting. Comments must be related to an item on the meeting agenda. The city recognizes the value of the call-in opportunity to provide access to those who can’t attend meetings in person and is working on a reliable solution. Agenda PLANNING COMMISSION 1.Call to order – roll call 2.Approval of minutes - April 12, 2023 and April 19, 2023 3.Hearing 3a. AC Marriott planned unit development amendment Applicant: Christopher Flagg, on behalf of TPI Hospitality Case No.: 23-03-PUD 3b. Corsa floodplain conditional use permit Applicant: Eric Ryan, on behalf of OPUS Development Company Case No.: 23-04-CUP 3c. Risor floodplain conditional use permit Applicant: Chelsey Janso, on behalf of Roers Companies Case No.: 23-05-CUP 4.Other Business 5.Communications 5a. Update on TOD station area planning 6.Adjournment Future scheduled meeting/event dates: May 17, 2023 – planning commission regular meeting June 7, 2023 – planning commission regular meeting June 21, 2023 – planning commission regular meeting July 5, 2023 – planning commission regular meeting 1 2 Planning commission April 12, 2023 6:14 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, Michael Salzer, Katie Merten, Tom Weber, Jan Youngquist Members absent: none Staff present: Jacquelyn Kramer, Sean Walther Guests: 1. Call to order – roll call 2. Approval of minutes – Feb. 15, 2023, and March 1, 2023 Commissioner Youngquist made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Eckholm, to approve the February 15 and March 1, 2023, minutes as presented. The motion carried unanimously. 3. Hearings 3a. Conditional use permit for Family Orthodontics, 5804 Excelsior Blvd. Applicant: Foundation Architects (Bob Schaffer) Case No: 23-02-CUP Ms. Kramer presented the report. Commissioner Divecha asked staff to explain why the city requires a CUP for this vs. making certain things acceptable or not acceptable. Ms. Kramer stated in general more intense uses have potential to have higher effects on the community, adding the CUP process allows staff and the council to make sure there are no problems with traffic, noise or pollution, and hours of use, among other things. Mr. Walther added these items that fall within the intensity classification are items that come up frequently during site plan reviews, adding this approach in the code created the logic for when additional public notice and public process for city approvals of a development is warranted. Chair Weber asked if this might include a business that wants to stay open later also. Ms. Kramer stated yes, hours of operation are one of the factors considered in determining the intensity classification. 3 Unofficial minutes Planning commission April 12, 2023 Page 2 Commissioner Beneke asked if the impervious surface is what is driving this particular CUP. Ms. Kramer stated yes. Commissioner Beneke asked if it is unusual to have an intensity classification of 6 in the C-1 zoning district. Ms. Kramer stated she was not sure how many properties are intensity class 6, but it is not unique to this property. Commissioner Youngquist asked if there will be more landscaping added in light of the additional impervious surface, in order to mitigate this. Ms. Kramer stated the applicant is improving the landscaping still meets the minimum requirements for tree and shrub plantings, despite the reduction in green space. Commissioner Divecha asked what the conditions of approval are. Ms. Kramer explained the conditions listed in the staff report, which are general conditions that apply to most planning applications such as allowed construction hours, keeping the construction site clear of debris, etc. Commissioner Merten asked if there is a building setback requirement. Ms. Kramer stated yes a 5-foot yard is required and the site plan meets that. Chair Weber opened the public hearing. Mr. Schaffer, the architect, stated they are making a vast improvement to the building, which was built originally in the mid-80s as a Pizza Hut. He noted the building still resembles the former use, and they are hoping the new addition will change that and modernize the building as well. He also noted it only increases the size of the dental office by one chair, and the landscaping will be enhanced and cleaned up. Chair Weber closed the public hearing. Commissioner Merten made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Salzer, to approve the conditional use permit (CUP) subject to the conditions in the staff report. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Other Business 5. Communications 5a. Comprehensive plan implementation update – housing activity report Mr. Walther noted this report lists various housing program updates and city expenditures of housing activity in the city. It serves as a progress report to commissioners regarding implementation of some of the comprehensive plan goals and strategies. He stated the full report is available on the city website also. 4 Unofficial minutes Planning commission April 12, 2023 Page 2 Mr. Walther added the city is assessing the boards and commissions program and application process and he asked the commissioners to complete a survey this week, adding they may be contacted for further follow-up. Mr. Walther added details about the zoning code update process is now on the website under the planning studies page and residents can sign up for push notifications from staff as input opportunities arise. He noted there seems to be strong interest and community engagement activities will be conducted beginning this summer. He added the zoning code update will be discussed in next week’s planning commission study session. Mr. Walther noted the webpage for the four small area plans related to the neighborhoods around the three light rail transit stations plus Excelsior Blvd west of Highway 100 was also updated. 6. Adjournment – 6:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Tom Weber, chair member 5 6 Planning commission April 19, 2023 6:00 p.m. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call Sean Walther or the administration department at 952.924.2525. Planning commission Study session Members present: Jim Beneke, Mia Divecha, Matt Eckholm, Katie Merten, Jan Youngquist Members absent: Michael Salzer, Tom Weber Staff present: Sean Walther, Gary Morrison; consultants Rita Trapp and Jeff Miller 1. Zoning code update – phase 1 Mr. Miller presented the report. The commissioners discussed what housing types to allow along identified corridors and around commercial nodes. The commission agreed in general that low and mid-rise housing types should be allowed. The details of how and where need to be further discussed. Commissioner Beneke noted as a representative of the school district, single-unit houses and owner-occupied housing should be preserved as they are more likely to be occupied by families with children than apartments or duplexes. Commissioner Youngquist noted single-unit houses used to create far more students than multi-family homes, but that was before cities had such a problem with affordable housing, adding this may have changed over time. Commissioner Beneke added he then would like to see some studies on this issue to inform future policy decisions that may result in removing existing single-unit houses. Commissioner Eckholm stated if all areas allowed to build apartments, did in fact build them, there would have been more built on Park Place Blvd area by now. He stated he thinks construction will start to slow down now and added he does not agree with the idea that the more places allowed to build apartments, will actually all build them. He added if this happens over 100 years, then that is just reasonable and gradual growth over time. Commissioner Eckholm stated if only single-unit houses are allowed, then there will be no changes, and the single-unit houses will become 10 times more expensive because there will be no place for that demand for growth to go. Commissioner Beneke stated there must be affordability so folks can still get into owner- occupied, single-unit housing within St. Louis Park. 7 Unofficial minutes Planning commission April 19, 2023 Commissioner Youngquist added the lot sizes do not actually allow for many apartment buildings to line up along Minnetonka Blvd. Mr. Miller asked the commissioners how long the housing types in the Minnetonka Blvd corridor should extend. From France to Ottawa or to Highway 100. The consensus was to Highway 100 with more density at the east end. The commission discussed how far from the street the corridors housing districts should extend. Should it include only the adjacent lots, extend to a parallel alley where present, or extend to the parallel street when present. Commissioner Eckholm stated he could see a problem if there were a full block and possible friction with neighborhoods, so possibly a half-block would be more appropriate. He added though it might be situational. Ms. Trapp noted areas on the map that are half-block areas, and asked if commissioners thought apartments are appropriate across the street from single-unit houses, with the street as a break between them, or if it is best to have an alley or street as a buffer or break between them. Commissioner Youngquist stated this is situational, depending on the street, such as Minnetonka Blvd or Louisiana Ave. Mr. Walther noted the impacts to single-unit housing will be something to review, especially when looking at scale, and when will it be compatible and incompatible. Commissioner Eckholm noted it may be more appropriate for more density around community parks as opposed to neighborhood parks.. Commissioner Youngquist added folks who live in multi-family housing might not have access to green space, so including a park is a good idea. She added that the housing around the Westwood Hills Nature Center may need to remain as a low scale housing type due to the predominate single-unit housing adjacent to it. Mr. Miller asked the commissioners to think about a mix of housing in other neighborhoods on the map, and if there could be a mix of low and high rise. Ms. Trapp stated this discussion will help in setting up a framework for the zoning corridors, and rationale to be used in each area. She noted the residential districts and started the discussion on the mix of housing types, such as a district with high-rise or low-rise, and another with single-family homes, and looking at the possibility of three districts. She stated this will be a starting point only and then evaluation can occur as the process moves forward. She stated they are renaming districts also as N1, N2, N3 for reference. 8 Unofficial minutes Planning commission April 19, 2023 Commissioner Divecha stated she likes the proposal, but she worries the homes in N1 will not be triplexes, however added this is a helpful clarification. Commissioner Youngquist noted some roads are curved because they are navigating around sensitive natural features such as wetlands, creeks, ponds and lakes and that is why they are built that way, while other may only be because of the later era and style that was preferred when they developed. Commissioner Eckholm noted areas where low-rise could be possible, and other areas just a few blocks off Minnetonka Blvd where low-rise would not be appropriate. Commissioner Beneke stated townhomes are owner-occupied, where apartments are not. He added he would like to see the city incentivize the development of condominiums also. Mr. Miller stated any and all housing types can be rented and could be within the same zone, and the zoning does not control the ownership type. Commissioner Eckholm added he would prefer to manage performance standards to establish conditions on where low rises can appear, as opposed to just removing them entirely. Mr. Morrison confirmedlow-rise apartments could have more restrictions than smaller housing types such as single-unit or townhomes. Ms. Trapp stated crafting the standards for the districts will be most important, and how all the standards work together, meeting the commission’s vision, and still being realistic so lots are buildable at the end. Ms. Trapp explained some of the history of zoning districts within the city from 1932. Noting that two-unit dwellings were allowed widely in St. Louis Park until the mid-1940s. She noted changes over time, and that proposes changes considered in this set of updates is allowing something that has been allowed in the past. Commissioner Divecha asked if there are building code regulations in terms of lot area. Ms. Trapp stated that she is not aware of any. Mr. Walther agreed and added that building codes do not require setbacks, rather the rules of the type of construction change based on the proximity of the building to the lot lines and types of uses occupying the buildings. Mr. Morrison also noted impacts to tree canopy and solar access need to be considered when discussing lot sizes and building types. Mr. Walther noted parking requirements for single-unit houses, and parking restrictions, that will need to be reviewed also. The commissioners discussed setbacks related to houses and garages, and lot size. 9 Unofficial minutes Planning commission April 19, 2023 Ms. Trapp noted different housing types within the same district, and asked if there are concerns with setback, building heights next to homes. Commissioner Eckholm stated his biggest concern is where N1 and N2 meet. He noted in N1, there is agreement they can be next to each other, but when N2 is adjacent to N1, then a mid-rise may be next to a house, or low-rise. He stated there may be some conditions in N2 to control how it interact with N1 in certain cases. He added he is not as concerned about N2 and N3. Ms. Trapp stated this could be done by house type vs. district. Commissioner Eckholm added he is not concerned as much about height as he is about everyone being okay with the gradual increase in intensity use. Commissioner Eckholm stated there are two districts where high rises will be allowed, and asked if it makes sense to allow low rises in there as well, in other words should low-rises be prohibited or should a minimum housing type and height be required. He noted maybe the definition of high rise could be changed to 6-story. Commissioner Divecha also noted the regional trails within the city and if additional housing types can be situated around these resources. Commissioner Eckholm agreed and noted as the bike network and design quality of infrastructure expands, along with great signage, that will create potential to connect people. Ms. Trapp stated next steps include creating purpose statements, working on districts, and starting a checklist. Mr. Walther stated the May 17th meeting will cover further discussions on this topic. 2. Adjournment - 7:52 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Tom Weber, chair member 10 Planning commission: Regular meeting Meeting date: May 3, 2023 Agenda item: 3a 3a Planned unit development (PUD) major amendment for AC Hotel by Marriott Location: 5075 Wayzata Boulevard Case Number: 23-03-PUD Applicant/Owner: Christopher Flagg, on behalf of TPI Hospitality Review Deadline: 60 days: May 30, 2023 120 days: July 29, 2023 Recommended motions: Chair to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. Motion to recommend approval of the PUD major amendment for 5075 Wayzata Boulevard as recommended by staff. Summary of request: Christopher Flagg, on behalf of TPI Hospitality, requests an amendment to the planned unit development (PUD) at the AC Marriott Hotel, located at 5075 Wayzata Boulevard. The amendment would allow a reduction to the required parking from 1.5 spaces per hotel room to 1.02 spaces per hotel room, or from 189 stalls to 129 stalls. Site information: Hotel Hotel Parking lot St. Louis Park Golden Valley Utica Avenue Interstate 394 11 Regular meeting meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: Planned unit development (PUD) major amendment for AC Hotel by Marriott Site area (acres): 1.62 (0.62 acres in St. Louis Park, 1.00 acre in Golden Valley) Current use: Surrounding land uses: Hotel North: right of way East: right of way South: multi-family residential West: multi-family residential Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning OFC- office PUD planned unit development Background: On April 4, 2016, city council approved a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD) to allow construction of a six-story, 126-room hotel. The building is the third phase of the Central Park West PUD and contains approximately 3,600 square feet of restaurant/lounge area, 1,700 square feet of meeting space, a spa, and 189 parking spaces. The site is split by the border of St. Louis Park and Golden Valley. The hotel building is on the St. Louis Park side and the parking lot is on the Golden Valley side of the border. The parking includes twenty-seven (27) underground spaces, fifty-four (54) surface spaces, and one-hundred-ten (110) spaces located in the 10 West End office building. The spaces located off-site are protected by a permanent easement agreement and include 50 stalls reserved for use by the hotel, and 60 non-exclusive stalls. Present considerations: The hotel opened in March 2018. In the five years the hotel has operated, parking demand rarely exceeded the 79 stalls located either under the hotel or in its surrounding surface parking lot. The 50 reserved stalls at 10 West End have accommodated overflow parking, and the hotel has never utilized any of the 60 non-exclusive stalls. The hotel now requests a text amendment to the PUD ordinance so that the required parking in the PUD will be reduced from 189 to 129. The 60 non-exclusive stalls would no longer be included in hotel parking counts. The hotel submitted a parking study conducted on all on-site and off-site parking from February 16 to March 16 of this year. In that time, the hotel occupancy rate fluctuated from 17% to 95%. In that time neither the 50 reserved stalls nor the 60 unreserved stalls were used by the hotel. Staff believe the parking study and the history of the site sufficient reason to now allow a reduction in the required parking. If the PUD amendment request is approved, all relevant contracts and agreements will be updated as necessary to reflect this change. Golden Valley PUD: In addition to the PUD in St. Lous Park, Golden Valley also includes the hotel’s parking parcel in their Central Park West PUD. Golden Valley’s zoning ordinance requires one space per hotel room for hotel uses, and their city staff plan to bring a request for a minor PUD amendment to Golden Valley city council on May 16, 2023. Next steps: Pending a recommendation from the planning commission, the City of St. Louis Park City Council is scheduled to consider the application on May 15, 2023. Recommendation: Staff recommend approval of the planned unit development amendment. 12 Regular meeting meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3a) Title: Planned unit development (PUD) major amendment for AC Hotel by Marriott Supporting documents: letter from applicant, draft ordinance, site plan, parking analysis Prepared by: Jacquelyn Kramer, associate planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager / deputy community development director 13 To Whom It May Concern: The AC Hotel West End (the “Hotel”) is requesting an amendment to an existing PUD for the reduction to its required parking from 1.50 per room (189 stalls) to 1.02 per room (129 stalls). The 126-room Hotel opened in March 2018. Hotel parking is currently provided in three different locations: (i) 25 subterranean stalls under the Hotel, (ii) 54 surface stalls located in front of the Hotel, and (iii) 110 offsite stalls. See Exhibit 1 for current locations and parking stall counts. Due to the delayed commencement of construction and ultimate completion of the 10 West End office building and parking ramp, the offsite stalls were originally accommodated at three different unimproved or severely unmaintained parking lots during the period of March 2018 through January 2021. See Exhibit 2 for approximate locations and dates for when each offsite location was utilized. In late January 2021, following the completion of the 10 West End office tower and parking ramp, the offsite stalls were relocated to their final location within the 10 West End office ramp. Per the current PUD, the 110 offsite parking stalls at the 10 West End parking ramp are split between 50 reserved stalls and 60 unreserved stalls. Based on 5 years of operating history and recently collected parking data, Hotel parking demand rarely exceeds the 79 parking stalls located either under the Hotel or in its surrounding surface parking lot, and if/when parking demand does exceed 79 parking stalls, the 50 reserved offsite stalls located within the 10 West End parking ramp are more than enough to accommodate the excess parking demand. The recently collected parking data is provided under Exhibit 3. Furthermore, the management and accounting of the 60 unreserved stalls, which have never been utilized, has become confusing and burdensome to the Hotel. Therefore, to eliminate the burden of managing and accounting for unreserved parking stalls, the Hotel is requesting a reduction of its required parking count by the 60 unreserved parking stalls (from 189 to 129) and an amendment to the PUD to require only 1.02 parking stalls per hotel room in lieu of the 1.50 stalls currently required. Thank you in advance for your time and consideration of our request. Regards, ACSLP, LLC By: _____________________________ Christopher Flagg Authorized Signatory TPI Hospitality| www.tpihospitality.com 103 15th Ave. NW, Suite 200 | Willmar, MN 56201 14 Ordinance No. ___-23 An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance regarding PUD 4 The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Whereas, the planning commission conducted a public hearing on May 1, 2023 regarding the ordinance, and Whereas, the city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (case no. 23-03-PUD), and Whereas, the ordinance approves a reduction in the required amount of parking from 189 spaces to 129 spaces by reducing the amount of off-site parking from 110 to 50. Now, therefore be it further resolved that the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36- 268-PUD 4 is hereby amended by adding underscored text and deleting strikethrough text. Section breaks are represented by ***. (a) Development plan. *** (2) Parking will be provided both on-site and off-site. The on-site parking will contain twenty-seven (27) underground spaces and fifty-two (52) surface spaces. Off-site parking will include one-hundred ten (110) fifty (50) parking spaces in an above ground ramp located on Lot 2, Block 1, Central Park West PUD No. 121 Second Addition Outlot A at 1603 Utica Avenue South. Parking will total one-hundred-eighty-nine (189) one hundred twenty-nine (129) parking spaces. Section 1. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 5, 2023 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: First reading May 15, 2023 Second reading June 5, 2023 Date of publication June 15, 2023 Date ordinance takes effect June 30, 2023 15 City Council Meeting of May 15, 2023 (Item No. [Keywords]) Page 2 Title: Ordinance amendment PUD 4 Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney 16 Under- Ground Parking 25 Stalls Surface Lot 54 Stalls 10 West End Reserved 50 Stalls Unreserved 60 Stalls EXHIBIT 1 17 Date Day of Week Occupied Rooms Available Rooms Hotel Occupancy Rate Surface Lot Count [54 Stalls] Underground Count [25 Stalls] Ten West Count [50 Stalls] Ten West Count [+60 Stalls] Total Parked Cars Counted Total Available Parking [189 Stalls] Unused Stalls Parking Utilization Rate [189 Stalls] 16-Feb Thursday 103 126 82%44 14 0 0 58 189 131 31% 17-Feb Friday 79 126 63%46 22 0 0 68 189 121 36% 18-Feb Saturday 76 126 60%48 22 0 0 70 189 119 37% 19-Feb Sunday 67 126 53%38 15 0 0 53 189 136 28% 20-Feb Monday 68 126 54%28 15 0 0 43 189 146 23% 21-Feb Tuesday 40 126 32%14 20 0 0 34 189 155 18% 22-Feb Wednesday 37 126 29%12 16 0 0 28 189 161 15% 23-Feb Thursday 29 126 23%8 13 0 0 21 189 168 11% 24-Feb Friday 30 126 24%25 10 0 0 35 189 154 19% 25-Feb Saturday 32 126 25%33 12 0 0 45 189 144 24% 26-Feb Sunday 31 126 25%12 10 0 0 22 189 167 12% 27-Feb Monday 95 126 75%41 11 0 0 52 189 137 28% 28-Feb Tuesday 120 126 95%45 12 0 0 57 189 132 30% 1-Mar Wednesday 120 126 95%47 14 0 0 61 189 128 32% 2-Mar Thursday 84 126 67%34 12 0 0 46 189 143 24% 3-Mar Friday 34 126 27%27 6 0 0 33 189 156 17% 4-Mar Saturday 38 126 30%34 10 0 0 44 189 145 23% 5-Mar Sunday 39 126 31%17 10 0 0 27 189 162 14% 6-Mar Monday 110 126 87%42 11 0 0 53 189 136 28% 7-Mar Tuesday 126 126 100%44 12 0 0 56 189 133 30% 8-Mar Wednesday 122 126 97%32 14 0 0 46 189 143 24% 9-Mar Thursday 77 126 61%19 8 0 0 27 189 162 14% 10-Mar Friday 21 126 17%17 2 0 0 19 189 170 10% 11-Mar Saturday 24 126 19%24 6 0 0 30 189 159 16% 12-Mar Sunday 24 126 19%15 5 0 0 20 189 169 11% 13-Mar Monday 97 126 77%41 8 0 0 49 189 140 26% 14-Mar Tuesday 110 126 87%43 7 0 0 50 189 139 26% 15-Mar Wednesday 107 126 85%41 8 0 0 49 189 140 26% 16-Mar Thursday 42 126 33%21 7 0 0 28 189 161 15% Rolling Total 1982 3654 54%892 332 0 0 1224 5481 4257 22% Weekend Sat/Sun 331 1008 33%221 90 0 0 311 1512 1201 21% Weekday M/T/W/Th/F 1651 2646 62%671 242 0 0 913 3969 3056 23% EXHIBIT 3 18 Planning commission: Regular meeting Meeting date: May 3, 2023 Agenda item: 3b 3b Corsa – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain Location: 3440 Beltline Blvd Case Number: 23-04-CUP Applicant: Eric Ryan, senior project manager Owner: OPUS Development Company Review Deadline: 60 days: June 2, 2023 120 days: August 1, 2023 Recommended motions: Motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for alternative construction methods for structures located in the floodplain, subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Summary of request: Eric Ryan, on behalf of OPUS Development Company, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for alternative construction methods in a floodplain at 3440 Beltline Boulevard. Section 36-297(c)(1) of the floodplain ordinance requires a CUP for any structure not elevated on fill as otherwise required by the floodplain ordinance. The plans submitted in 2021 for the planned unit development meet the floodplain requirements. The attached plans show slight revisions to the grades surrounding the building to improve the flood protection. Staff is in favor of the alternative construction because: 1. It reduces the amount of fill in the floodplain and preserves natural flood storage. 2. The plan provides compensatory storage to offset fill placed in the floodplain, so the development does not reduce the volume of flood storage. 3. It preserves the pedestrian connection and interaction between the building and public way by minimizing barriers such as retaining walls and elevated entrances to the building. Background: A planned unit development (PUD) for the Corsa apartment building was previously approved by the city on July 6, 2021. The proposed building complied with city code, including the floodplain regulations, and was therefore approved and is currently under construction. The CUP was not part of the developments planning application package because the intent was to review the floodplain regulations as part of the PUD application. It was, however, recently determined that a CUP is technically required and cannot be waived in favor of a PUD approval. Therefore, the applicant has applied for the required CUP. It should be noted that the process for PUD and CUP approval is the same, with the exception that a PUD is an ordinance that requires two readings before the council. Both applications require a notification to surrounding properties, utility companies and applicable jurisdictions, publication in the paper, a public hearing before the planning commission, and city council approval. Additionally, the floodplain impacts were reviewed by city staff, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the Minnesota DNR which oversees developments with floodplain 19 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3b) Title: Corsa – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain impacts. The CUP does not require additional review or process that was not already completed with the PUD application. The requirement for the CUP approval came to our attention when the property owner requested the city’s assistance with their application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to remove the building from the floodplain. City staff determined that we would not be able to sign off on the LOMR until the CUP was approved. Site information: Site area (acres): 3.94 acres Current use: Surrounding land uses: Corsa apartment buildings, under construction. North: Business park uses East: Bass Lake Preserve South: Risor apartment building, under construction West: Business park uses – including Steel Toe Brewery 20 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3b) Title: Corsa – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning TOD - transit oriented development PUD planned unit development Floodplain Present considerations: As noted above, the Corsa apartment building was approved in 2021, and is currently under construction. Portions of the property are located within the FEMA 1% chance floodplain of the Bass Lake Preserve, which has a flood elevation of 879.2. It is anticipated that FEMA will be revising the flood maps to reflect the latest precipitation data referred to as Atlas 14. The city’s surface water modeling of the Bass Lake Preserve using the Atlas 14 estimates that the flood elevation has increased from 879.2 to approximately 879.9. The city data is not the official flood elevation; however, it is the best available data and indicates what the city expects revised FEMA maps to reflect when they are released. The exact release date of the revised FEMA maps is unknown but is anticipated in approximately five years. City floodplain ordinances require buildings to be elevated so their lowest floor is at least two feet above the flood elevation. City code also generally requires the fill to extend away from the building in all directions at least 15 feet at the elevation of two feet above the flood elevation. Buildings that do not meet these requirements may be approved by CUP as alternative construction within the floodplain. Corsa was not designed to meet these requirements, because of its proximity to the public right-of-way. The amount of fill needed to meet this requirement would have conflicted with the public sidewalks and both Beltline Blvd and 35th Street. Therefore, the city approved alternative construction within the floodplain as part of the PUD; however, a CUP should have been included in the application and approvals. Floodplain protection measures: Habitable space, such as the commercial and residential portion of the Corsa, are required to be at least two feet above the flood elevation. The lowest floor of the habitable areas is 882.0, which is more than two feet above the current flood elevation of 879.2 and the estimated Atlas 14 flood elevation of 879.9. Additionally, safe exit routes are provided to multiple areas around the building and to the public right-of-way that are all above the flood elevation. Non-habitable space, such as the parking structure, are not required to maintain the two feet separation from the flood elevation and may be designed to internally flood. Corsa maintained an elevation of 880.25 as the lowest elevation around its perimeter. This elevation is intentional to keep overland flood waters from entering the parking structure. The lowest floor elevation of the parking structure is the bike storage area. Its floor elevation is 877.63, which is below the flood elevation. This portion of the parking structure would flood if the flood elevation outside the building ever rose to higher than 880.25. There is a floor drain located in the bike storage area which will pump water into the sanitary sewer should this area flood. As part of the review for this application, staff requested the grade and sidewalks around the perimeter of the building be increased to at least 880 where possible. As a result, several revisions were made as noted in the attached plans. These improvements will increase the building’s flood protection. 21 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3b) Title: Corsa – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain The apartment building and the parking structure are built as two independent buildings. This is done to meet building code, and it also allows the lowest floor of the parking structure to be lower than the floodplain elevation as noted above. The lowest floor of habitable spaces, such as the apartment building and commercial spaces must be at least two feet above the floodplain elevation. Staff recommendation: The parking structure and apartment building meet the requirements of the city floodplain ordinances; therefore, staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit to allow the apartment building and parking structure as alternative construction within the floodplain, with the following conditions: 1. The final grades around the building be completed as illustrated in Exhibit A-Site Plan, Exhibit B-Grading Plan. 2. A final elevation certificate shall be submitted upon completion of the final grade. 3. A floodproofing certificate shall be submitted upon completion of the final grade. Supporting documents: project plans Prepared by: Gary Morrison, zoning administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager / deputy CD director 22 UP F.8 J 1 1 2 3 1 0.29.9 1 1.1 1 1.2 1 2.2 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 AA K H G F D.9 E D C.8 C.2 1 1.3 1 2.3 1 3.1 L D.5 C.5 C C A A 4 1 2 D.8 D.2 D.3 C.7 C.4 C.3 2.8 2.9 3.3 3.7 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 B B 9.4 169E1 69A 169E.6 169AB1 70 ONE WAY GARAGE ENTRY PROPOSED BUILDING FFE: 882.00 RETAIL FFE: 883.0 RETAIL FFE: 882.0 ADA ROUTE ADA ROUTE ADA ROUTE ADA ROUTE ADA ROUTEADA ROUTE ADA ROUTE ADA ROUTEADA ROUTE ADA ROUTEADA ROUTE ADA ROUTEADA ROUTEADA ROUTEADA ROUTE ADA ROUTEADA ROUTEADA ROUTE4.0'MOVE-IN AREA ENTRY, 883.0 (REF. ARCH, TYP.) ENTRY, 882.0 (REF. ARCH, TYP.) EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 4' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ENTRY, 882.0 (REF. ARCH, TYP.) ENTRY (REF. ARCH, TYP.) 8.5' 8.5' TYP. 26.0'6.0' 35.8' 1 0.6' 35.3' 68.1' 7.0'30.0' 29.1' 29.1 ' 8.5'8.5' 26.0'1 8.0' A A A A A G F E J J A C C I I I I I I I I I TYP. A TYP. A C C L L M N BEGINS M N ENDS 5.0' O O 1 0 8 4 A EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL BY CITY 14.2'EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING C GATE AMENITY ENTRANCE/ EXIT (REF. ARCH, TYP.) C C L UTILITY EXCAVATION PATCH, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS J I I I I PR. TRANSFORMER PAD ELECTRICAL ROOM (REF. ARCH, TYP.) WATER ROOM (REF. ARCH, TYP.) 31 .8' C C P P P P BB PROPOSED RAMP WITH RAILING V CV V V L Q PROPOSED DOG RUN, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS K K K R R C S (10 SPACES) S (6 SPACES) EXISTING 10' ELECTRIC EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 927757 20' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 991559 20' WIDE RAILROAD EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2982801 T T T TT T T TT T EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 5' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED ALLEY DEDICATION D 7.0' 30.0' EXISTING ±1,105 SF WETLAND TO BE FILLED EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP BY CITY; CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE BITUMINOUS TRAIL, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS U U U F PROPOSED 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 1 0.0' G ENTRY, 881.25 (REF. ARCH, TYP.) GARAGE ENTRY, 880.25 ENTRY, 882.0 (REF. ARCH, TYP.) ENTRY, 882.0 ENTRY, 882.0 ENTRY (REF. ARCH, TYP.) ENTRY (REF. ARCH, TYP.) M N M ENTRY, 883.0 (REF. ARCH, TYP.) ENTRY, 883.0 (REF. ARCH, TYP.) PROPOSED RE-STRIPING, COORDINATE WORK AND INSTALLATION WITH CITY 8.5'7.2'31.8' 1 0.6' EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA- SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAIL 5' BUILDING SETBACK 31 ' BUILDING SETBACK 4.0' VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN INGRESS AND EGRESS, DRIVEWAY AND PARKING EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 5773761 J J 8.5' Q Q Q CC Z Z Z Z Z X X Y Y PR. TRANSFORMER PAD 1 3 D D PROTECT BITUMINOUS TRAIL THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. TRAIL TO BE REPLACED AT EXPENSE OF SITE WORK SUBCONTRACTOR AA BB BB P BB Z CC N M D N M FUTURE PICKLEBALL COURT BY OTHERS C V SITE CONTRACTOR TO MATCH EXISTING STRIPING, TYP. Z D DD EE FF GG I E HH II 23.0' 32.0'K MATCH EXISTING STRIPING 9.0' CC CC CC CC CC JJ 20.0' 8.5' 20.0' 23.0'20.0'7.9'5.0'10.0'1.0'12.7' 6.0'24.0'5.1'TYP.7.5' TYP. 18.0'TYP.8.7' 28.5' 48.5'88.0'6.0' 28.5' 25.0' 32.0' 1 4.0' 30.7' 11.5'6.0' 8.8' 27.6'9.1'13.7'6.9' TYP. 1 9.5' TYP.4.0'5.4'58.2'58.9'10.4' 5.0'26.0'36.0'8.5'8.5'50.9'1.4'35.3'19.5'13.6'17.1 '11.2'5.0' 30.0'19.0 ' 24.4'5.0'18.2' 5.0'5.0'12.0'5.0'26.0'5.0'7.1'6.0'30.0'8.0' 5.0'47.0'44.0'20.0'13.5' 22.1' 34.4' 26.4'12.8' 1 2.0' 5.0'18.0' 4.0' JJ R6.0 '4.0'1.5'KK BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 162,289 SF (3.73 AC) GROUND FLOOR AREA 88,244 SF (54.4% OF TOTAL PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA) GROSS FLOOR AREA (EXC. PARKING STRUCTURE)269,914 SF (1.66 FAR) PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 230 SPACES (1 STALL/ BEDROOM; 230 UNITS) PROPOSED PARKING:OFF-STREET: 35 SPACES ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 3 STALLS / 4 STALLS PROPOSED EXTERIOR BICYCLE PARKING 16 SPACES PROPERTY SUMMARY 3440 BELTLINE BLVD EXISTING PROPERTY AREA 171,732 SF (3.94 AC) PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA 162,289 SF (3.73 AC) DEDICATED BELTLINE BLVD ROW AREA 5,219 SF (0.12 AC) DEDICATED ALLEY AREA 4,224 SF (0.10 AC) EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 115,138 SF (2.65 AC) EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 47,150 SF (1.08 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 121,858 SF (2.80 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 40,430 SF (0.93 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 174,960 SF (4.02 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING MX-1: VERTICAL MIXED-USE AND FLOOD PLAIN PROPOSED ZONING PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 0' ROAD = 0' PROVIDED BUILDING SETBACKS BELTLINE BLVD = 5' 35TH AVE = 31' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB FLUSH CURB COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRON LIGHT POLE TIP OUT CURB PEDESTRIAN RAMP BIKE RACK CONNECT TO ADJACENT EXIST. BITUMINOUS TRAIL, CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM LOCATION, GRADES, AND CONDITION PAVEMENT MARKING B618 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER "DO NOT ENTER" SIGN STOP SIGN PRE-MANUFACTURED STAIRS, RISERS, HANDRAIL; SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN FENCE AND GATE; SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN RAILING, TYP.; SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN CONCRETE STAIRS WITH HANDRAILS "LOADING ZONE ONLY" SIGN - CONFIRM SIGNAGE WITH OWNER FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION; SEE MEP PLANS CONCRETE SWALE INSTALL AND RECONNECT SALVAGED CITY LIGHT POLE EV PARKING SIGNAGE; SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS EV CHARGING STATION - SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPOSED RETAINING WALL PER MANUFACTURER; SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPOSED 6" TALL CURB A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE FF GG HH II JJ KK This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\OPUS\Beltline - St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg April 03, 2023 - 9:29am©BYREVISIONS No. DATE DOG RUN UPDATE 5 05/26/2022 BAWRETAIL LOT & GRADING UPDATES 6 06/10/2022 BAWALLEY GRADING & STORM UPDATES 7 07/01/2022 BAWSTORM AND GRADING UPDATES 8 07/26/2022 ESBDOG RUN AND GRADING UPDATES9 10/20/2022 BAWWALKOUT UNIT GRADING UPDATES 1001/03/2023 BAWGRADING UPDATES PER CITY 11 02/17/2023 BAW SITE PLAN NOTES 1 . ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 11/16/2020. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL EXISTING PROPERTY AREA IS 3.94 ACRES. 9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 8.5' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.NORTHPREPARED FOR SITE PLAN C4003440 BELTLINE BLVD BELTLINERESIDENCES, LLC. ST. LOUIS PARK MN DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM MATZEK, P.E. 03/29/2022 45790 DATE CHECKED BY SCALE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY KHA PROJECT 160561014 03/29/2022 AS SHOWNWDM BAW WDM BELTLINE TRAIL AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN 2021; IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON FINAL PLANS. TIP OUT CURB AND GUTTER; SEE SITE DETAILS PROPOSED BITUMINOUS TRAIL, PER CITY DETAIL PROPOSED DOG RUN AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS ADA ROUTE ADA PATH - REFER TO NOTE 14, GRADING PLAN NOTES, SHEET C500 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 04/03/202323 UP F.8 J 1 1 2 3 1 0.2 9.9 1 1.1 1 1.2 1 2.2 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 AA K H G F D.9 E D C.8 C.2 1 1.3 1 2.3 1 3.1 L D.5 C.5 C C A A 4 1 2 D.8 D.2 D.3 C.7 C.4 C.3 2.8 2.9 3.3 3.7 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 B B 9.4 169E1 69A 169E.6169AB170 GARAGE ENTRY PROPOSED BUILDING FFE: 882.00 RETAIL FFE: 883.0 RETAIL FFE: 882.0 DSTR-105 STR-102 STR-101 STR-106A STR-202 STR-204 STR-207 STR-205 STR-206 STR-203 882882880878879880878879881880 878879881880 880878 8 80 8 8 1 DDSTR-209 STR-208 STR-103 SOUTHEAST COURTYARD INSET A STR-107 882878GRADE BREAK STR-104 ME:80.45 ME:80.87 ME:80.01 ME:80.40 ME:79.32 880 8808798808 8 0 8 8 5 8 81 882 8 8 3 8 8 4 8 8 6 8 8 7 8818828868808858 79 881882883884878 878 878 8 78 879878879 879 878 879880 880 EXPOSED FOUNDATION 880 ST-107A ST-108A RD-103A RD-102A RD-102 RD-103 RD-108B RD-107B PROPOSED CONCRETE SWALE (2) - 7" STAIRS WITH HANDRAIL EXPOSED FOUNDATION ME:81.21 ME:82.07 ME:81.20881881 ST-111 ST-110 880 881 882 884 8 83884STRM-211 STRM-212 STRM-210 8808788798 8 1881GRADE BREAK GRADE BREAK STR-213 MECHANICAL ROOM FFE: 882.00 ST-109 3.10%1.81%1.34%5.28%1.14%4.50%5.36%5.23%3.73%1.27%1.70%7.60% 1.54% 2. 8 8 % 2.33% 1 3.88% 8 .24 %1.82% 1.57%24.32%4.90%1.97%3.52%2.70%0.69%1.76%1.63%1 . 6 4%1.27%0.85%0.63%2.21 % 5.37 % 1 .04% 0.73% 1.84 % 1.5 5 % 4 .05% 2. 0 2 % 8.81% 4.84% 0.50%1.30%1.27%4.80%5.40%2.59%1.29% 1 .89%1.29%2.34%4.36%1.6 6% 1 1.1 8% 6.5 0 % 0.63 %1.65%2.36%2.36%1.85%0.54%2.03%0.9 4%5.29%1.36%1.16%1.26%1 . 0 3%4.68%1 0.86% 3.06%2.86%4.50%1.46%3.84% 0.50%8824.50%880 880 880 880 881 DDGRADE BREAK GRADE BREAK 2.01 % 8.75% 7.88% 79.44 81.78 82.00 81.82 82.0082.00 81.83 81.08 81.00 80.95 79.56 ME:79.04 ME:79.44 80.18 81.00 82.00 82.00 83.00 83.00 83.00 83.00 83.00 82.69 83.06 82.83 ME:82.56 ME:82.88 83.00 82.89 82.07 G:81.91 82.00 82.00 81.90 82.41 T/G:82.27 G:80.50 T/G:80.20 T/G:80.08 G:79.71 T/G:78.00 ME:77.90 81.07 T:80.44 78.07 80.24 80.93 81.97 81.97 82.00 G:80.57 G:81.37 81.54 G:81.37 T/G:81.87 T/G:81.87 T/G:81.71 G:81.25G:81.02 T/G:78.59 T/G:78.53 T/G:78.16 T/G:78.10 ME:77.62 ME:77.41 G:77.28 T/G:77.97 T/G:77.84 T/G:78.07 T/G:77.95 LP:81.25 83.00 G:81.75 G:80.17 G:80.01 G:81.31 G:81.15 G:81.25 G:81.50 G:81.26 G:80.94 G:77.15 81.94 81.65 82.00 81.92 LP:81.25 HP:81.54 LP:81.23 T/G:81.45 ME:77.22 ME:77.93 ME:77.21 82.00 82.00 EOF:80.40 79.80 T/G:82.63 82.00 G:78.73 78.01 78.17 T/G:77.94 G:80.25 G:80.64 82.00 83.16 82.89 81.02 80.73 80.2580.25 T/G:82.39 82.12 82.45 82.20 82.26 ME:83.40 82.50 ME:84.69 ME:84.80 ME:79.37 ME:78.89 82.00 81.95 81.95 82.00 81.80 81.82 82.00 82.00 80.39 82.00 79.36 79.34 82.00 81.88 82.00 82.00 EOF:81.07 G:79.94 G:82.36 82.94 G:81.99 LP:82.47 81.90 81.67 81.75 LP:81.25 LP:81.25 HP:81.79 LP:81.25 ME:78.29 ME:78.25 79.12 79.17 T:81.67 G:81.17 81.94 80.78 EOF:81.75 79.09 LP:79.05 81.08 82.90 T/G:82.88 G:81.30 G:81.39 G:81.37 81.74 81.63 LP:81.11 LP:81.11 LP:81.20 82.12 81.87 81.81 82.01 81.50 81.76 81.91 81.60 81.88 LP:81.06 G:81.41 82.30 81.75 81.84 81.39 81.39 81.83 83.04 82.56 82.98 83.5183.43 82.55 81.47 81.33 80.78 81.38 80.73 80.95 81.18 81.21 81.25 HP:81.95HP:81.07 G:81.43 HP:81.29 82.47 82.56 81.16 81.19 ME:80.12 ME:80.22 ME:80.01ME:80.04 ME:80.24 ME:80.11 ME:80.40 80.7480.64 80.63 ME:79.95 ME:79.98 ME:79.90 G:80.24 79.25 81.59 G:80.97 80.51 80.38 78.21 ME:77.90 ME:77.77 LP:877.12 81.91 ME:77.20 79.32 79.31 NORTHWEST WALKWAY INSET B HP:81.33 1 1.06% 81.47 80.07 81.50 T:80.06 79.51 880 UP 1.00%880878 880 879 881 8818818818818811.00%1.61%0.94%1 . 3 0%0.58%1.00%1.00%3.86% 0 . 7 8%STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (7) - 6" STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 879 87 9 8.67%1.00%14.10%1.00%13.74%0.83%1.67%8800.77%%25.61%STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (6) - 5.0" STAIRS SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS 1.00%1.82%29.42%11.3 3%12.77%9.93%2.97%24.32%(3) - 6.5" RISER CONCRETE STEPS WITH HANDRAIL3.28%(3) - 5.5" RISER CONCRETE STEPS WITH HANDRAIL (2) - 7.0" RISER CONCRETE STEPS WITH HANDRAIL (2) - 5.0" RISER CONCRETE STEPS WITH HANDRAIL (2) - 5.0" RISER CONCRETE STEPS WITH HANDRAIL (1) - 7.0" RISER CONCRETE STEPS WITH HANDRAIL 878.39 881.93 882.00 878.39 882.00 880.29 880.24 880.30 880.25 TW:881.96 TW:881.96 BW:880.39 BW:880.25 TW:882.00 BW:882.00 881.92 TW:881.98 BW:880.25 ME:878.44 ME:878.49ME:878.14 ME:878.22 881.17 879.43 881.93 881.93 ME:879.27 ME:879.29 878.62 TW:881.89 BW:880.39 880.28 880.35 882.00 880.29 880.24 880.30 880.25 TW:881.95 BW:880.25 878.87 ME:878.67 ME:878.70 ME:878.90 ME:878.95 880.28 880.35 882.00 880.29 880.30 880.25 TW:881.88 BW:880.25 880.24 879.07 ME:879.25 ME:879.30 880.28 880.35 881.97 880.29 880.30 880.25 TW:881.88 BW:880.25 880.24 879.41 ME:879.20 ME:879.25 880.28 880.35 880.29 880.30 880.25 TW:881.88 BW:880.25 880.24 879.41 ME:879.51 ME:879.51 880.28 880.36 880.29 880.30 880.25 TW:881.88 BW:880.25 880.25 879.67 879.38 TW:881.99 BW:881.99 TW:880.40 BW:880.15 This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\OPUS\Beltline - St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg April 03, 2023 - 9:30am©BYREVISIONS No. DATE DOG RUN UPDATE5 05/26/2022 BAWRETAIL LOT & GRADING UPDATES 6 06/10/2022 BAWALLEY GRADING & STORM UPDATES 7 07/01/2022 BAWSTORM AND GRADING UPDATES 8 07/26/2022 ESBDOG RUN AND GRADING UPDATES9 10/20/2022 BAWWALKOUT UNIT GRADING UPDATES 1001/03/2023 BAWGRADING UPDATES PER CITY 11 02/17/2023 BAWPREPARED FOR GRADING PLAN C5003440 BELTLINE BLVD BELTLINERESIDENCES, LLC. ST. LOUIS PARK MN DATE: I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO. WILLIAM MATZEK, P.E. 03/29/2022 45790 DATE CHECKED BYSCALE DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY KHA PROJECT 160561014 03/29/2022 AS SHOWNWDM BAW WDM GRADING PLAN NOTES 1 . ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 4. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 7. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 8. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 9. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 11. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 12. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>. 13. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 14. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 15. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 16. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 17. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 18. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATIONHP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D 1 " = 10' SOUTHEAST COURTYARD A NORTH NORTHTIP OUT CURB AND GUTTER; SEE SITE DETAILS UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT NOTES 1 . UPON COMPLETION OF THE STORMWATER BMP AND FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE TRIBUTARY DRAINAGE AREA, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT SHOWS THE BMPS DRAWS DOWN WITHIN 48 HOURS AFTER A SIGNIFICANT RAIN EVENT. 2. NO CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT SHALL TRAVEL WITHIN THE UNDERGROUND DETENTION / FILTRATION SYSTEM AREAS. 3. FINAL EXCAVATION OF UNDERGROUND DETENTION / FILTRATION SYSTEM AREAS MUST OCCUR IN DRY SOIL CONDITIONS TO PREVENT SMEARING AND COMPACTION. DO NOT WORK IN DETENTION / FILTRATION AREAS IF SOIL CONDITIONS ARE WET. 4. IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SYSTEM CONSTRUCTION, THE EXCAVATION FOR THE TRENCH SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY BACKFILLED WITH APPROVED BACKFILL MATERIAL PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATION, OR THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE PROTECTED WITH SILT FENCE AND OR BIO-ROLLS SUCH THAT ON-SITE SOILS DO NOT ENTER THE TRENCH EXCAVATION AREAS. 5. IF ANY SOILS ENTER THE TRENCH PRIOR TO BACKFILLING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE SOILS. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AND COMPLETE CERTIFIED AS-BUILT PLANS DEMONSTRATING ALL CONSTRUCTED STORMWATER CONVEYANCE STRUCTURES, AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES (INCLUDING AS-BUILT VOLUMES) CONFORM TO DESIGN AND/OR PLANS AS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 7. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AREAS TO BE KEPT OFF-LINE UNTIL DISTURBED AREAS ARE RESTORED. IF NOT POSSIBLE, SYSTEMS MUST BE CLEANED OUT PRIOR TO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 04/03/202324 FD FD FD FD FD FD FD FD FD C A 4 1 25 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 B 1 A4.08 2 A3.03 1 A3.03 3 A3.03 UP UP STAIR A 1-A ELEC 169C ELEV LOBBY 167 STAIR D 1-D PARKING GARAGE 170 ELEV LOBBY 100 ELEV 1 ELEV 2 ELEV 3 MECH SLOPE 5.76%SLOPE DOWN 4%18' - 0" 24' - 1" 18' - 2"18' - 0"TYP 8' - 0" TYP 18' - 0" 1 6' - 0" 880.67 25' - 2"CORR 159 CORR 158 BIKE STORAGE, DERO ULTRA SPACE SAVER SQUARED, OR EQUAL +0 TSE +0 TSE = +882'-0" CLEARANCE BAR OVERHEAD (882'-0" = +0 TSE) -1 4.5" TSE -1 2.5" TSE -1 4" TSE -1 1.5" TSE MAX 2% CROSS SLOPEMAX 2% CROSS SLOPETYPTYP-8" TSE -21" TSE -22" TSE 1' - 6" 1 ' - 6" 1 69C 169D1 00B 100A1691-AB1-AA1 69A BIKE STOR 169A 169E167A167B 1 0" 53' - 0" 1 1' - 6" 36' - 0" 36' - 0" 36' - 0" 32' - 0" 26' - 0"25' - 6"1 0" 257' - 8" 1 6' - 5"25' - 8"24' - 9"7' - 0"12' - 0" 85' - 0" 18' - 0" 60' - 8"60' - 6" 10" 1 ' - 2"1 8' - 0"220' - 8"1 7' - 0" 1 0"256' - 0"1 0"20' - 6" 13' - 0" 70' - 10" 18' - 6"10"121' - 2" 10"9' - 4" FIX-IT STATION -1 6" TSE +0" TSE 1 6 A5.22 877.63 GAS METERS MIN 1 ' - 6" -1 1.5" TSE -1 1.5" TSE -8" TSE 3' - 6"1 8' - 6" -52.5" TSE -52.5" TSE -52.5" TSE -52.5" TSE -49.5" TSE -52.5" TSE -40" TSE A2.08 11 +0" TSE 4' - 6" 24' - 0" -1 1.5" TSE +0 TSE +0 TSE +0 TSE +0 TSE 1' - 0"3' - 9" 9"1' - 0"5' - 0" 5' - 0" 5' - 0" STEEL BOLLARDS, /SEE 1 A1.02 6' - 8" MM MECH STEEL BOLLARD, / SEE 1 A1.02 F.E. F.E. F.E. F.E. M M M M M 18' - 0"OMIT ONE BLOCK AT S.O.G. FOR DRAINAGE, INFILL OPNG W/ FINE METAL MESH CLOSURE BOLLARD /SEE 2 A1.02 LOUVER 48" X 48" 8' - 6" 8' - 0" 8' - 6" A2.08 8 A2.07 3 A2.09 6 A2.09 3 1-DB1 -DA SHADED AREA INDICATES REQUIRED 8'-2" MIN CLEAR HEADROOM CLEARANCE BAR OVERHEAD -49.5" TSE -60"* TSE M MTEMPPARKINGSTALL 013 012 011 010 009 008 OMIT 007 006 005 004 003 002 001 015016 017 018 019 020 021 022 023 024 025 026 027 028 029 030 031 032 033 034 035 036 037 038 039 040 041 042 043 044 045 046 047 048 049 050 051 052 053 054 055 056 057 058 059 060 061 062 063064065 066 067 068 069 070 071 085086 087 088 089 090 SET THRESHOLD IN A BED OF SEALANT CONC WASH AS REQ'D 9' - 6"3' - 4" -1 0" TSE -1 3" TSE -1 6" TSE -8" TSE -1 0" TSE -1 6" TSE 19' - 4"23' - 9" -1 5" TSE -1 7" TSE -1 3" TSE -1 7" TSE -21" TSE -21" TSE -21" TSE A5.03 4 +0 TSE EXHAUST FAN HC SIGN - WALL MOUNT /SEE 3 A1.02 ALIGN 1 6" x 16" LOUVER, T.O. LOUVER +/- 8'-0" AFF 6' - 0"*COORD FINAL SLAB ELEV WITH PLUMBING 1 70 20' - 0" 2' - 0" SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 1 0350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE: PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 10/28/2022 2:09:56 PMENLARGED GARAGE PLAN - LEVEL 1 A2.10 BELTLINE RESIDENCES 3440 BELTLINE BLVD, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 31815 Checker Designer S. SHIFFLETT / E. RYAN 07/18/22 TRUEN 1 /8" = 1'-0"1 ENLARGED LEVEL 1 GARAGE PLAN ISSUE RECORD 03/03/22 PERMIT RESUBMITTAL SET 04/25/22 CONSTRUCTION SET 06/29/22 AB-01 07/18/22 GENERAL REVISION 1 09/28/22 GENERAL REVISION 2 10/28/22 AB-03 25 26 Planning commission: Regular meeting Meeting date: May 3, 2023 Agenda item: 3c 3c Risor – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain Location: 3510 Beltline Blvd Case Number: 23-05-CUP Applicant: Chelsey Janso, on behalf of Roers Companies Owner: Roers Companies Review Deadline: 60 days: June 3, 2023 120 days: August 2, 2023 Recommended motions: Motion to recommend approval of the conditional use permit for alternative construction methods for structures located in the floodplain, subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Summary of request: Roers Companies, applied for a conditional use permit (CUP) for alternative construction methods in a floodplain at 3510 Beltline Boulevard. Section 36- 297(c)(1) of the floodplain ordinance requires a CUP for any structure not elevated on fill as otherwise required by the floodplain ordinance. The plans submitted in 2021 for the planned unit development meet the floodplain requirements. The attached plans show slight revisions to the grades surrounding the building to improve the flood protection. Staff is in favor of the alternative construction because: 1. It reduces the amount of fill in the floodplain and preserves natural flood storage. 2. The plan provides compensatory storage to offset fill placed in the floodplain, so the development does not reduce the volume of flood storage. 3. It preserves the pedestrian connection and interaction between the building and public way by minimizing barriers such as retaining walls and elevated entrances to the building. Background: A planned unit development (PUD) for the Risor apartment building was previously approved by the city on October 4, 2021. The proposed building complied with city code, including the floodplain regulations, and was therefore approved and is currently under construction. The CUP was not part of the development planning application package because the intent was to review the floodplain regulations as part of the PUD application. It was, however, recently determined that a CUP is technically required and cannot be waived in favor of a PUD approval. Therefore, the applicant has applied for the required CUP. It should be noted that the process for PUD and CUP approval is the same, with the exception that a PUD is an ordinance that requires two readings before the council. Both applications require a notification to surrounding properties, utility companies and applicable jurisdictions, publication in the paper, a public hearing before the planning commission, and city council approval. Additionally, the floodplain impacts were reviewed by city staff, the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, and the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) which oversees 27 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3c) Title: Risor – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain developments with floodplain impacts. The CUP does not require additional review or process that was not already completed with the PUD application. Site information: Site area (acres): 3.29 acres Current use: business park uses – former Surrounding land uses: Comcast offices and fitness studios North: approved mixed-use building East: Bass Lake Preserve South: Wolfe Park Professional Center West: business park uses Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning TOD - transit oriented development MX-1 vertical mixed use Proposed zoning PUD planned unit development 28 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3c) Title: Risor – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain Present considerations: As noted above, the Risor apartment building was approved in 2021, and is currently under construction. Portions of the property are located within the FEMA 1% chance floodplain of the Bass Lake Preserve, which has a flood elevation of 879.2. It is anticipated that FEMA will be revising the flood maps to reflect the latest precipitation data referred to as Atlas 14. The city’s surface water modeling of the Bass Lake Preserve using Atlas 14 estimates that the flood elevation has increased from 879.2 to approximately 879.9. The city data is not the official flood elevation; however, it is the best available data and indicates what the city expects revised FEMA maps to reflect when they are released. The exact release date of the revised FEMA maps is unknown but is anticipated in approximately five years. City floodplain ordinances require buildings to be elevated so their lowest floor is at least two feet above the flood elevation. City code also generally requires the fill to extend away from the building in all directions at least 15 feet at the elevation of two feet above the flood elevation. Buildings that do not meet these requirements may be approved by CUP as alternative construction within the floodplain. Risor was not designed to meet these requirements, because of its proximity to the public right-of-way. The amount of fill needed to meet this requirement would have conflicted with the public sidewalks and both Beltline Blvd and 35th Street. Therefore, the city approved alternative construction within the floodplain as part of the PUD; however, a CUP should have been included in the application and approvals. Floodplain protection measures: Habitable space, such as the commercial and residential portion of the Risor, are required to be at least two feet above the flood elevation. The lowest floor of the habitable areas is 882.0, which is more than two feet above the current flood elevation of 879.2 and the estimated Atlas 14 flood elevation of 879.9. Additionally, safe exit routes are provided to multiple areas around the building and to the public right-of-way that are all above the flood elevation. Non-habitable space, such as the parking structure, are not required to maintain the two feet separation from the flood elevation and may be designed to internally flood. Risor maintained an elevation of 880.0 as the lowest elevation around its perimeter. This elevation is intentional to keep overland flood waters from entering the parking structure. The lowest floor elevation of the parking structure is also 880.0. As part of the review for this application, staff requested the grade and sidewalks around the perimeter of the building be increased to at least 880 where possible. As a result, several revisions were made as noted in the attached plans. These improvements will increase the building’s flood protection. Staff recommendation: The parking structure and apartment building meet the requirements of the city floodplain ordinances; therefore, staff is recommending approval of the conditional use permit to allow the apartment building and parking structure as alternative construction within the floodplain, with the following conditions: 1. The final grades around the building be completed as illustrated in Exhibit A-Site Plan, Exhibit B-Grading Plan. 2. A final elevation certificate shall be submitted upon completion of the final grade. 29 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 3c) Title: Risor – conditional use permit for alternative construction in floodplain 3. A floodproofing certificate shall be submitted upon completion of the final grade. Supporting documents: project plans Prepared by: Gary Morrison, zoning administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager / deputy CD director 30 3 5 T H S T R E E T W E S TB E L T L I N E B O U L E V A R D PROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDING ± 82,000 S.F. FFE VARIES: 880.00 - 882.00 NORTHING: 154123.67 EASTING: 510669.50 NORTHING: 154513.61 EASTING: 510894.09 NORTHING: 154354.65 EASTING: 511170.08 NORTHING: 153964.70 EASTING: 510945.49 LAT: N44° 56' 22.36" LONG: W93° 20' 31.68" LAT: N44° 56' 26.21" LONG: W93° 20' 28.55" LAT: N44° 56' 24.64" LONG: W93° 20' 24.72" LAT: N44° 56' 20.79" LONG: W93° 20' 27.84" ADA ACCESSIBLE PATH TO RETAIL SPACE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE FOR 7' ALLEYWAY DEDICATION EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED ASPHALT TRAIL DEMO ASPHALT TRAIL AND EXTEND CONCRETE DRIVEWAY APRON UP TO ASPHALT DRIVEWAY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT GC TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN DETOUR WHEN TRAIL WILL BE CLOSED DURING CONSTRUCTION INGRESS/EGRESS AREA FOR PEDESTRIAN ACCESS (VIA DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT) ALLEY SECTION 8" CONCRETE 6" BASE PER CITY DETAIL ST-28 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 2.5'12.4'17.6' 14.0'14.0' 7.0'31.4'16.1' 13.1' 14.9'148.7' 144.6' 8.0' 20.0'6.0'7.0'10.0'10.0' 5.1'1.9'6.0' (TYP.) 5.0' (TYP.) 6.0' (TYP.) 5.0' (TYP.)4.7'2.2' 10.6'2.5'4.0' 5.0'5.0'5.0'13.0'24.6' A C C C B B G G G AA A C C FF E E F F F E E E C C A F I C CC D J J J A N N M N M 100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION BOUNDARY EL: 879.20' PER FEMA FLOOD MAP NO. 27053C0354F LANDSCAPE WALL O O O O O O O P O O 52.4'10-YR FLOOD ELEVATION BOUNDARY SU-1 - EL: 877.71' C M H I C Q R L K R R R K"BEGIN ONE-WAY" SF E 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0' 5.0'5.0' R10.0' R10.0'R50.0' R30.0' R3.0' R3.0' R3.0' R12.5' T M I C C T PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT TO CENTERLINE OF ROADPAVEMENT REPLACEMENT TO CENTERLINE OF ROAD FULL WIDTH PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT BENCH & BIKE RACKS ON CONCRETE SIDEWALK - REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS 7 BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS EXISTING PROPERTY AREA PRIOR TO ROW DEDICATION 143,326 SF (3.29 AC) PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA AFTER ROW DEDICATION 139,048 SF (3.19 AC) BUILDING AREA 82,000 SF (57.2% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PROPERTY SUMMARY 3510 BELTLINE BLVD PROPERTY AREA 143,326 SF (3.29 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 106,634 SF (2.45 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 36,692 SF (0.84 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 152,369 SF (3.50 AC) PREVIOUS PROPERTY AREA 143,326 SF (3.29 AC) PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA 139,050 SF (3.20 AC) TOTAL DEDICATIONS 4,276 SF (0.09 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING MX-1 MIXED USE PROPOSED ZONING PUD PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BUILDING SETBACKS SEE ARCH. PLAN FOR PUD BUILD-TO SETBACKS PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA KEYNOTE LEGEND RETAINING WALL (REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL / STRUCTURAL PLANS) ACCESS TO BUILDING PARKING RAMP MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER/ SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRON, SEE DETAIL ON SHEET C702 EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN (REFERENCE LANDSCAPE PLANS) B618 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT "ONE-WAY" SIGN STOP SIGN DIRECTIONAL PAVEMENT MARKING STOP BAR - SEE SHEET C702 FOR DETAIL PROPOSED STOOP / STAIRS / RISERS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS PROPOSED TRANSFORMERS & CONCRETE PADS PROPOSED GENERATOR REINSTALL "NO PARKING" SIGN TWO-SIDED "STOP" AND "ONE-WAY, DO NOT ENTER" SIGN PROPOSED PATIO FENCE, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL FLUSH CURB A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R R S T ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTIONSignature Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160352000 CPH RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK No. Description Date 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM JARED F. JONES 46610 04/19/2022 JFJ Response #1 to City Comments 03/10/22 12/30/2021 RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK 3510 Beltline Blvd Saint Louis Park, MN 55416 Response #2 to City Comments 04/08/22 4 ASI #4 08/25/22 Construction Set 04/19/22 6 ASI #6 10/05/22 CUP PLAN UPDATES (04/07/2023) 7 CUP PLAN UPDATES 04/07/23 SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY TROSSEN LAND SURVEYING, DATED 7/21/2021. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 3.29 ACRES. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 10. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 11. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 12. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 13. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 14. EXISTING WETLANDS ON SITE ARE CLASSIFIED AS INCIDENTAL AND RECEIVED A NO LOSS DETERMINATION FROM THE MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT IN THE NOTICE OF DECISION REPORT DATED 11/12/2021.NORTHPROPOSED STORMWATER TREATMENT FILTRATION BASIN EXISTING PROPERTY LINE C400 SITE PLAN REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING PAVEMENT / CURB AND GUTTER FOR PROPOSED UTILITY SERVICE EXCAVATIONS, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK STANDARDS ASPHALT TRAIL (BY OTHERS), ANY DAMAGE TO THE TRAIL TO BE FIXED / RECONSTRUCTED 31 3 5 T H S T R E E T W E S TB E L T L I N E B O U L E V A R DDDDDDPROPOSED MIXED-USE BUILDING ± 82,000 S.F. FFE VARIES: 880.00 - 882.00 CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ADDRESS FLOODING, STORAGE OF MATERIALS, WATER PUMPING, ETC.874.5EOF:878.60 874.5EOF:878.50 88 0 88 0 880 880 878 8 78 878879 8 7 9 881881 87987687787 8 87 9 8 7 8 8778768 75 8 76877 87 8 879 8 8 0875 880.00 882.00 G:879.50 881.24 878.27 ME:877.09 878.10 877.94 882.00 880.08 FFE:882.00 882.00 881.83 878.23 881.83 878.33 878.35 881.91 G:880.73 ME:877.70 T/G:877.99 877.91 878.12 878.32 878.32 877.57 LP/G:878.91 G:880.32 881.76 881.83 G:880.20 881.71 878.66 878.66 878.66 876.56 877.57880.08 882.00 881.91 880.00 882.00 FFE:882.00FFE:882.00 878.33 878.07 878.29 878.27878.22 881.80 878.30 878.03 878.18 877.98 BMP #1 LANDSCAPED FILTRATION BASIN B/POND: 874.50 T/POND: 878.50 WQ OUTLET: 877.00 WQ VOLUME PROVIDED: 20,570 CF TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED: 36,645 CF BMP #2 LANDSCAPE FILTRATION BASIN B/POND: 874.50 T/POND: 878.50 WQ OUTLET: 877.00 WQ VOLUME PROVIDED: 4,950 CF TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED: 9,860 CF 100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION BOUNDARY. EL: 879.20 PER FEMA FLOOD MAP NO. 27053C0354F LANDSCAPE WALL TRAIL DEMO AND REBUILD FOR ADA ACCESS 1.40%1. 20% 3. 00 % 3 . 3 0 %3.49 % 2.20%5.44%1.24%1.53%1.49%2.22%7.22% 1.50% 2 . 1 2% 33.33% 2.01% 3 : 1 3:13:13:13:1 3:1 3 : 1 1.49%1.57%1.91%0.91%1.48%1 . 5 0% 20.41% 3 : 1 3:11.35%2.93%1 .5 2%3.28%4.77% 872.00 9.85% 9.95% 8.72%8.18%5.29%1. 79 % 1. 80 % 3.98%2.49%1.03%1.67%2.03%T/G:881.44 T/G:881.53 881.06 881.01 880.45 880.49 880.35 G:880.99 T:881.49 T:880.82 T:881.23 T:880.00 T:880.70 G:880.08 T:880.58 T:880.00 G:879.50 879.35 878.84 878.90 879.54 879.66 881.83 882.00 882.00 878.72 878.76 878.51 878.40 T/G:881.90 T/G:881.74 FFE:882.00 SEVEN - 6" RISERS FOUR - 6" RISERS ME:877.15 FIVE - 6" RISERS SEVEN - 6" RISERS 877.72 881.76 878.31 SIX - 6" RISERS G:879.05 T:879.55 GRADE BREAK, RIDGE LINE (TYP.) GRADE BREAK, RIDGE LINE (TYP.) GRADE BREAK, RIDGE LINE (TYP.)4.55%25.00% 1. 7 9 % 22.43% 13.45% 1.80 % 13.57% 1. 79 % THREE - 6" RISERS TWO - 6" RISERS ONE - 6" RISER THREE - 6" RISERS FOUR - 6" RISERS FOUR - 6" RISERS THREE - 6" RISERS FOUR - 6" RISERS FIVE - 6" RISERS 1.33% 881.92 880.50 880.45 881.50 881.45 881.00 880.95 2.00%1.29% 878.58 878.54 878.78 878.82 879.38 879.35 879.02 878.98 879.35 879.31 879.02 878.98 879.10 879.19879.23 879.10 879.37 879.08879.19 879.23 879.50 879.50 879.69 879.73 878.96 879.19 879.23 878.96 878.65 879.51 878.73 878.69 3:1 FFE:881.33 FFE:881.33 FFE:881.33 FFE:881.33 FFE:881.33 FFE:881.33 FFE:882.00 879.46 879.69 879.73 879.46 FFE:880.00 FFE:880.00 FFE:882.00 FFE:882.00 1. 5 7% GRADE BREAK, SWALE (TYP.) 5.20% 2.65% 2 . 3 5 %1.76 %3.30%GRADE BREAK, SWALE (TYP.) T:879.72 G:879.22 GRADE BREAK, RIDGE LINE (TYP.) T:879.64 G:879.14 T:879.42 880.55 880.50 881.05 881.00 881.50 881.45 879.98 879.93 G:879.40 T:879.90 G:879.91 T:880.41 T:882.02 G:881.52 G:881.38 T:881.88 T:880.36 G:879.86 T:880.83 G:880.33 G:881.30 T:881.80 881.83 ME:877.69 878.21 881.76 881.71 G:879.38 T:879.88 1.49%1.00%1.00%1.95%1.00%2.00%0.45% 1.76% 1.31% 1.96% 1 . 6 1% 878.27 877.63 ME:877.14 ME:877.10 877.39 877.44 G:879.50 T:880.00 881.33 880.00 880.00 880.10 880.04 880.10 880.04 880.10 880.04 880.10 880.04 880.10 880.04 880.10 880.04 878.92 879.06 880.08 6.35%1.55 %7.17% 7 7 880.10 7 ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTIONSignature Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160352000 CPH RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK No. Description Date 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM JARED F. JONES 46610 04/19/2022 JFJ Response #1 to City Comments 03/10/22 12/30/2021 RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK 3510 Beltline Blvd Saint Louis Park, MN 55416 Response #2 to City Comments 04/08/22 4 ASI #4 08/25/22 Construction Set 04/19/22 6 ASI #6 10/05/22 CUP PLAN UPDATES (04/07/2023) 7 CUP PLAN UPDATES 04/07/23 GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-1785 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 19. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 20. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. 22. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ADDRESS FLOODING, STORAGE OF MATERIALS, WATER PUMPING, ETC. EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATIONHP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D NORTHSTORMWATER NOTES & ASSUMPTIONS 1. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE FLOOD MANAGEMENT PLAN TO ADDRESS HOW FLOODING, STORAGE OF MATERIALS, WATER PUMPING, ETC. WILL BE ADDRESSED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 2. TOTAL WATER QUALITY VOLUME REQUIRED: 9,184 CF 3. FILTRATION ASSUMED DUE TO HIGH GROUNDWATER AND POTENTIAL FOR CONTAMINATED SOILS 4. MINNEHAHA CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT CREDITS 50% FOR FILTRATION PER RULE C 5. ASSUMED FILTRATION RATE OF 0.8 INCH PER HOUR 6. TOTAL FILTRATION VOLUME REQUIRED 18,368 CF 7. TOTAL FILTRATION VOLUME PROVIDED 25,520 CF 8. PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN FILL VOLUME: 4,110 CY 9. PROPOSED FLOODPLAIN MITIGATION VOLUME: 4,129 CF LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE 1 C501 C500 GRADING PLAN EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 32 0.00%1.7 6% 1 2.9 8%1.39%1.21%1.21%1.21%1.21%1.22%2.20% 9.73%2.21%2.63%0.00%2.75%1.50% 1.00%100-YR FLOOD ELEVATION BOUNDARY E: 879.20' PER FEMA FLOOD MAP NO. 27053C0354F 1.00% 7 .43 % 4.6 2%0.86 % 0.8 6% 0.8 6%4.32%0.54%1.01%0.70% FFE: 880.0' 880.00 879.95 880.00 880.00 T/G:880.00 879.82 879.78 T:880.00 G:879.50 T:879.73 G:879.23 879.69 T:879.67 G:879.17 879.54 T:879.53 G:879.03 879.40 T:879.38 G:878.88 T/G:878.79 878.85 878.76 878.70 ME:878.59 ME:878.34 T/G:878.67 878.55 878.67 G:878.69G:878.88G:879.03 G:879.50 G:879.14G:879.29 TOP OF SLAB: 880.12 TOP OF SLAB: 880.12 TOP OF SLAB: 879.89 TOP OF SLAB: 880.00 TOP OF SLAB: 880.00 TOP OF SLAB: 880.01T/G:880.00 T:880.00 T:879.77 G:879.27 T:880.00 G:879.50 T:879.79 T:879.64 T:879.53 T:879.38 T:879.19 0.70% 0.70% 0.70% 0.70%0.70% 0.70% 0.70% 0.70% 4.29%4.95%4.10% 8 7 9 880.30 880.17 G:879.62 T:880.12 1.02% G:879.45 T:879.95 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 880.01 880.09880.00 879.91 879.91 880.00 880.08 879.99 T/G:880.00T/G:880.00 TOP OF SLAB: 880.30 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 880.20 880.17 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 880.10 880.13 TOP OF SLAB: 880.20 TOP OF SLAB: 880.17 880.14 1.49%1.70%7 GARAGE APPROACH TABLE ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTIONSignature Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLAN I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota 7/17/2020160352000 CPH RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK No. Description Date 2023 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114 PHONE: 651-645-4197 WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COM JARED F. JONES 46610 04/19/2022 JFJ Response #1 to City Comments 03/10/22 12/30/2021 RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK 3510 Beltline Blvd Saint Louis Park, MN 55416 Response #2 to City Comments 04/08/22 4 ASI #4 08/25/22 Construction Set 04/19/22 6 ASI #6 10/05/22 CUP PLAN UPDATES (04/07/2023) 7 CUP PLAN UPDATES 04/07/23 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION EXISTING STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATIONHP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D NORTHINLET PROTECTION LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE FILTER LOG SILT FENCE SCALE 1"= 5' NE ACCESS ROUTE AND TRANSFORMER PAD1 C501 GRADING ENLARGEMENTS EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 33 REF ICEUP U P U P DN DN DN DN DN D N D N DN DN DNDN U P U P 4 4 5 5 DD C 6 6 7 7 8 8 9 9 EE FF GG HH K K P P 3 3 10 10 11 11 1 1 13 1312 1.2 AA B 9.4 V V U 2 10.5 10.3 M N 1.4 11.1 12.1 A.9 J.6 L O Q Q T J 4.9 P.8 R 2.1 3.4 RETAIL EXIT PASSAGEWAY STAIR A WATER AND FIRE SERVICE ELECTRIC TRASH / RECYCLING PARKING LOWER LEVEL ELEV LOBBY BIKE STORAGEBIKE STORAGE EXIT PASSAGEWAY 1BR LW STUDIO LW STUDIO LW 2BR LW MOVE-IN / LOADING HALLWAY STAIR B CORRIDOR STUDIO LW 1BR LW 2BR LW 1BR LW STAIR C RAMP UP882.00' 880.00' 10 BIKES 8 BIKES POND -REFER TO CIVIL POND -REFER TO CIVIL 5' - 0" 18' - 8" 10' - 8" 6' - 2" 20' - 9" 2' - 1" 25' - 4" 9" 14' - 11" 16' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 2' - 0" 14' - 4"2' - 0" 1 ' - 9" 25 ' - 4"21 ' - 8" 28' - 4" 1 9' - 4" 29' - 0" 28' - 11" 28' - 11" 9' - 5" 1 9' - 6"23' - 7" 26' - 10" 29' - 1" AMAZON HUB LOCKERS 1BR LW STAIR D STUDIO LW 1BR LW 1BR LW STUDIO LW 1BR LW 881.33' 881.33' 880.00' 880.00' FEMA FLOOD PLAIN ELEVATION LOBBY VESTIBULE COFFEE BAR GOLF SIMULATOR PACKAGE VESTIBULEMAIL WORK ROOM LEASING OFFICE VESTIBULE RESTROOM72' - 2" 1 41' - 7" 8' - 0" 65' - 9"63' - 4" 25' - 4" 34' - 4" 141' - 4" 22' - 4"2' - 8" 1 92' - 8" 99' - 8"186' - 0"14' - 3" 70' - 5" 7' - 0" 288' - 0" 7' - 0" 1 ' - 9" 20' - 4" 8' - 8" 1 3' - 0"26' - 2" 2' - 2" 1 9' - 4"29' - 0" 28' - 11" 28' - 11" 28' - 11" 6' - 2"8' - 0" 9' - 5" 9' - 7" 22' - 8" 23' - 8"6' - 10" 27' - 6" 26' - 11" 9' - 5" 14' - 0" 4' - 9" 6' - 8" 24' - 3" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 0" 30' - 4" 16' - 0"UNEXCAVATED STAIR E PET SPA MDF CORRIDORCORRIDOR RESTROOM882.00' ACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE - SEE / 1 AC3.0 22' - 0"22' - 8"38' - 0" 22' - 8" 38' - 0" 22' - 8" 880.33' 882.00' 880.00' 880.00' 880.00' 882.00' 882.00' 882.00' 880.00' 880.08' 882.00' 882.00' 882.00'882.00'882.00' 882.02' 882.00' 882.00' 882.00'882.00' 882.00' 882.00' 882.00' 882.00' 882.00' 882.00' 880.00' 880.00' 880.00' 881.33' 881.33' 881.33' 881.33' 881.33' 881.33' 881.33' DRIVE-THRU PARKING 882.00' Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2023 9:58:14 AMA101 LEVEL 1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 221538 Author Checker 04/04/23 RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK 3510 Beltline Blvd Saint Louis Park, MN 55416 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (04/07/2023) No. Description Date 1/16" = 1'-0"A101 1 LEVEL 1 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN 34 4 5 LEVEL 3 122' -0" LEVEL 4 132' -8" LEVEL 5 143' -4" LEVEL 6 154' -0" ROOF LEVEL 164' -8" 6 7 8 9 3 10 11 LEVEL 1.5 102' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -0" 1 1312 2 10.5 10.3 11.1 12.1 4.9 2.1 3.4 (882.00) LEVEL 1 100' -0" PARKING UPPER LEVEL 110' -4" D C LEVEL 3 122' -0" LEVEL 4 132' -8" LEVEL 5 143' -4" LEVEL 6 154' -0" ROOF LEVEL 164' -8" E F G H K P LEVEL 1.5 102' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -0" N UNIT MEZZ 111' -4" LEVEL 1.25 101' -4" AB V U M N J.6 O Q T J (880.00) Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2023 9:58:25 AMA201 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 221538 Author Checker 04/04/23 RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK 3510 Beltline Blvd Saint Louis Park, MN 55416 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (04/07/2023) No. Description Date 3/32" = 1'-0"A201 1 EAST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A201 2 NORTH ELEVATION 35 LEVEL 1 100' -0" PARKING UPPER LEVEL 110' -4" 4 5 LEVEL 3 122' -0" LEVEL 4 132' -8" LEVEL 5 143' -4" LEVEL 6 154' -0" ROOF LEVEL 164' -8" 6 7 8 9 3 10 11 LEVEL 1.5 102' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -0" N UNIT MEZZ 111' -4" LEVEL 1.25 101' -4" 113 12 1.2 9.4 1.4 (880.00) LEVEL 1 100' -0" PARKING UPPER LEVEL 110' -4" D C LEVEL 3 122' -0" LEVEL 4 132' -8" LEVEL 5 143' -4" LEVEL 6 154' -0" ROOF LEVEL 164' -8" E F G H K P LEVEL 1.5 102' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -0" A B VU M N A.9 J .6 L O Q T J P.8 R (880.00) Signature Typed or Printed Name License # Date PROJECT NUMBER DRAWN BY CHECKED BY ORIGINAL ISSUE: REVISIONS: KEY PLANNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONI hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota 4/5/2023 9:58:39 AMA202 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 221538 Author Checker 04/04/23 RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK RISOR ST. LOUIS PARK 3510 Beltline Blvd Saint Louis Park, MN 55416 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (04/07/2023) No. Description Date 3/32" = 1'-0"A202 1 WEST ELEVATION 3/32" = 1'-0"A202 2 SOUTH ELEVATION 36 Planning commission: Communication Meeting date: May 3, 2023 Agenda item: 5a 5a Small area plans for transit station areas and western Excelsior Boulevard Recommended Action: No action at this time. Project overview and objectives: The City of St. Louis Park is beginning a city-led planning process to update existing transit station area plans and create a new small area plan to guide development decisions. We are working with SRF Consulting Group and Mend Collaborative to lead us through this process. The effort will include updates to the three existing light rail station area plans and the creation of a new small area plan for western Excelsior Boulevard. The resulting plans will provide guidance and implementation actions to support development that aligns with the community’s interests, the city’s strategic priorities, and the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The four plans include: • Updates to the Beltline Boulevard station area plan • Updates to the Wooddale Avenue station area plan • Updates to the Louisiana Avenue station area plan • Establishment of a western Excelsior Boulevard small area plan 37 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 5a) Title: Small area plans for transit station areas and western Excelsior Boulevard Community engagement process: Community engagement provides opportunities for members of the St. Louis Park community to participate in ideation, to inform the process and plans, and to inform city decisions. The city recognizes that the four study areas and surrounding areas are important to the entire community serving social, environmental, mobility, economic development and housing needs. The community is invited to participate in each phase of the plan through in person and online opportunities as identified in the graphic below. Phase 1 of engagement: The first phase of community engagement is currently underway and focuses on identifying valued assets, issues and opportunities within the study areas. Activities seek to gather the community’s experiences and feelings about the four study areas in general. This will be achieved through an online community survey, which is currently open and will stay open through the first week of June, as well as an open house on May 23, 2023, from 4 – 7 p.m. at city hall in the council chambers. Links to the survey and information on the open house can be found on the project website. Future phases of engagement: Future engagement opportunities include a series of study area workshops, which will give community members an opportunity to go more in-depth and develop creative and detailed ideas for each study area. There will also be pop-up events in the fall of this year where community members will give input on the solutions developed out of those workshops and confirm direction for each study area. Community advisory group: In addition to community engagement, a community advisory group will be used to guide the planning team in the process to ensure the community is informed and engaged and the solutions respond to the community’s needs and experiences. The community advisory group will advise the planning team in three areas during the small area plan process: • Support the identification of the community’s needs and experiences • Provide an understanding of the community • Identify the best ways to provide information and gather input 38 Regular meeting of May 3, 2023 (Item No. 5a) Title: Small area plans for transit station areas and western Excelsior Boulevard The first meeting of the community advisory group was on April 27, 2023, and in addition to kicking off the small area planning process, the group reviewed and refined the community survey to better reflect the outcomes of the project. They also contributed ideas on branding for the project to make it easier to understand and engage with. There is still an opportunity for community members to become part of the community advisory group. We have space for more members and are looking for individuals who can provide a perspective that has traditionally been excluded from planning processes in the past, including renters, BIPOC individuals, and youth. If you have specific community members you would recommend for this role, please contact planning staff. Next steps: Planning commissioners are encouraged to participate in community engagement events for the small area planning project and to encourage friends, family, and neighbors to participate as well. Also, we welcome commissioners to follow the city’s mailing list for updates and share city posts on social media. If you have any specific ideas for the planning team on how to connect with community members, or ideas for the study areas, please contact senior planner, Laura Chamberlain, at lchamberlain@stlouisparkmn.gov. Prepared by: Laura Chamberlain, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager/deputy CD director 39