HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998/09/08 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular1
7:20 p.m. - Economic Development Authority
AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
September 8, 1998
7:30 p.m.
1. Call to order
2. Presentation
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of Minutes
a. City Council meeting of August 17, 1998
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
b. City Council Study Session of August 10, 1998
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
5. Approval of agenda
a. Consent agenda
Note: All matters on consent (starred items) are considered to be routine and will be enacted by
one motion approving all. There is no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is
desired, the starred item will be moved to the regular agenda.
Action: Motion to approve - Motion to delete item(s)
b. Agenda
Action: Motion to approve - Motion to add item(s)
*c. Resolutions and Ordinances
Action: By consent, waive reading of resolutions and ordinances
6. Public Hearing
6a. Conditional Use Permit at 3120 Glenhurst Avenue
2
Case No 98-24-CUP
Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a 124 unit apartment building and
separate property management building at 3120 Glenhurst Avenue
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the conditional use
permit subject to conditions included in the resolution
6b. Public Hearing on the Resolution Giving Preliminary Approval to the
Refinancing of Park Ridge Apartments Revenue Bonds and Authorizing the
Execution and Delivery of an Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of
Expenses; and Authorizing Preparation of Necessary Documents
The resolution would give preliminary approval to the issuance of revenue bonds
for the Park Ridge Associates, Limited Partnership. Proceeds from the sale of the
bonds will be used to refinance the acquisition and rehabilitation of Park Ridge
Apartments, a 93-unit multi-family housing project located at 2480 South Highway
100.
The resolution also authorizes the execution of related documents including
application to the Department of Trade and Economic Development for approval of
the refinancing.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to approve the
resolution .
7. Petitions, Requests, Communications
8. Resolutions and Ordinances
8a. Resolution for Gambling Premises Permit for O’Tooles Pub at 4608 Excelsior
Boulevard
St. Louis Park Hockey Boosters Association Gambling Premises license at 4608
Excelsior Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the resolution approving the premises permit.
8b. Resolution for Gambling Premises Permit for Gipper’s Sports Bar at 4608
Excelsior Boulevard
Minnesota Youth Athletic Services Gambling Premises license at 4608 Excelsior
Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416
3
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the Premises Permit.
8c. Resolution for Gambling Premises Permit for Classic Bar & Cafe at 4700
Excelsior Boulevard
Minnesota Youth Athletic Services Gambling Premises license at 4700 Excelsior
Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the Premises Permit.
8d. Possession of Knives or Edged Weapons in School Zones Ordinance
An ordinance amending Chapter 12 of the St. Louis Park City Code concerning the
possession of dangerous edged weapons on school property.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to waive second reading, adopt ordinance, approve
summary and authorize publication.
8e. Second reading of an ordinance to amend City Charter Chapter 11.03
(Vacation of Streets) and certain Appendices
St. Louis Park Charter Commission has recommended Charter amendments to
Chapter 11 and certain Appendices for City Council enactment by ordinance.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve second reading of the ordinance to amend
Charter Section 11.03 and Appendices, adopt ordinance (7
affirmative Councilmember votes required), and authorize its
publication.
8f. Resolution Approving the Preliminary Property Tax Levy and Budget for the
1998 Fiscal Year and Establishing the Dates and Times for the Public Hearing
Resolution approving the preliminary property tax levy and budget is required by
Truth in Taxation legislation. Information contained in the resolution will be used
in the individual tax notices prepared by the County in advance of the hearing dates.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the resolution which establishes the
preliminary tax levy and budget for 1999 and sets the hearing
dates and times.
9. Reports from Officers, Boards, Committees
*a. Planning Commission Minutes of August 5, 1998
4
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*b. Vendor Claim Report
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
10. Unfinished Business
a. Board and Commission Appointment(s)
Action: Motion to appoint Board and Commission Member(s)
11. New Business
11a. Vision for the Arts Strategic Plan
Council is being requested to authorize a one-time expenditure of $2000 to assist in
funding for the Vision for the Arts Strategic Plan being developed by the Friends of
the Arts.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to authorize an expenditure of $2000 to support the
Vision for the Arts Strategic Plan.
11b. Confirmation of the Appointment of Cynthia S. Walsh to the Position of Parks
and Recreation Director
This action confirms the appointment by the City Manager of Cynthia S. Walsh to
the position of Parks and Recreation Director.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to confirm the appointment of Cynthia S. Walsh to the
position of Parks and Recreation Director effective September
21, 1998.
11c. Scope of Work - Golden Auto Site-Railroad Connection Issue
Approval of the Scope of Work and Professional Services agreement with Richard
L. Koppy/RLK and Associates for project management services.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve a Scope of Work associated with carrying out
certain roles and tasks outlined in the preliminary agreement
5
between the City of St. Louis Park/EDA and Hennepin County
and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute a
professional services agreement with Richard L. Koppy/ RLK
and Associates for project management services.
*11d. Bid Tabulation: Purchase of Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Supply
Contract
This report considers the purchase of Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) for Water
Treatment Plant No. 1, (WTP #1) located at 2935 Jersey Avenue South.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to authorize execution of a contract with Calgon Carbon
Corporation for the purchase of GAC in the amount of
$27,628.00.
*11e. City Engineer’s Report: City-wide random curb and gutter and sidewalk
repair work - Project No. 98-07.
This report reviews the City’s random curb and gutter and sidewalk repair program
and recommends authorization to receive bids.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution accepting the City
Engineer’s Report, establishing and ordering improvement
Project No. 98-07, approving plans and specifications, and
authorizing receipt of bids.
*11f. Bid Tabulation: One (1) New 4X4 Utility Vehicle
This report considers the purchase of One (1) new 4X4 Utility Vehicle.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to designate Superior Ford the lowest responsible bidder
for one (1) New 4X4 Utility Vehicle and authorize execution of a
purchase agreement with Superior Ford, Inc. in the amount of
$28,700.00.
12. Miscellaneous
13. Claims, Appropriations, Contract Payments
a. Contract payments - Partial
Midwest Asphalt Corporation - Contract No. 17-98 97,690.89
Ford Road/Shelard parkway/Ford Lane
Hardrives, Inc. - Contract No. 14-98 145,535.12
6
Construction of Excelsior Boulevard - Phase 2 Monterey Ave to
France Ave
Hardrives, Inc. - Contract NO. 16-98 7,209.55
W 35th/W 36th/W 23/W 24/Utica
Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. - Contact No. 47-98 3,392.78
Louisiana Ct. From W 28th St to cul-de-sac
Concrete sidewalka nd street lighting
DMJ Corporation - Contract No. 37-98
Bridge Maintenance
Action: By consent approve and authorize payments
14. Communications
15. Adjournment
7
Item # 4a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
August 17, 1998
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Gail Dorfman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
2. PRESENTATIONS
Westwood Nature Center Jr. Naturalist Recognition: Doug Langefels, Recreational Services
Manager of the Parks and Recreation Department briefly explained the Junior Naturalist Program
at the Westwood Nature Center. He recognized the contributions of Naturalists, Mark Oestreich,
Becky McConnell, Betsy Knox, Vinny Goeddeke, Carol Miller and Mark Zembryki and Stacy
Clark.
Carrie Hughes, Westwood Nature Center Junior Naturalist Coordinator, thanked parents for their
support of the program, presented a video and recognition certificates to 33 junior naturalists who
completed the program.
3. ROLL CALL
The following Councilmembers were present: Jeff Jacobs, Chris Nelson, Sue Sanger, Robert
Young, Jim Brimeyer, and Mayor Gail Dorfman.
Also present were the City Manager (Mr. Meyer); City Attorney (Mr. Scott); Superintendent of
Engineering (Mr. Moore); City Assessor (Mr. Stepnick); and Zoning Administrator (Mr. Moore).
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
4a. City Council meeting of August 3, 1998.
Minutes were approved as presented.
4b. City Council Study Session meeting of July 27, 1998.
With the following changes the minutes were approved as presented:
Page 14, 1st Paragraph, second line, change sue to use and 2nd paragraph add
language; also consider expanding the availability of the rehabilitation loans to
those neighborhoods where they have not already been available.
Page 13, 3rd Paragraph, add language; need to consider the impact of adding
sidewalks on all the boulevard trees.
8
5. APPROVAL OF AGENDAS
5a. Consent Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Nelson to approve the
consent agenda. The motion passed 6-0.
5b. Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Brimeyer to approve the
agenda. The motion passed 6-0.
5c. Resolutions and Ordinances
By consent, Council waived reading of resolutions and ordinances.
6. PUBLIC HEARINGS
6a. Public Hearing: Alley Paving - 3700 Block between France Avenue and Glenhurst
Avenue - Project No. 94-23.
Resolution # 98-109
Bruce Stepnick, City Assessor presented staff report.
George DuFour, 3755 Glenhurst Avenue South, believed the project would be a highly desirable
addition to the City and make the neighborhood safer.
Tom Roach, 3741 Glenhurst Avenue South was highly in favor of the project.
Mayor Dorfman closed the public hearing with the right of the Council to reopen it at a future
date.
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to adopt the
attached Resolution ordering Project No. 94-23, the construction of a concrete alley in the 3700
Block between France Avenue and Glenhurst Avenue, approving plans and specification and
authorizing receipt of bids. The motion passed 6-0.
6b. Assessment Hearing for Project 94-23 at the 3700 Block of France and Glenhurst
Avenues
Resolution # 98-110
Scott McGiver, 3745 Glenhurst Avenue, was concerned about the safety of neighborhood kids
and asked if speed bumps would be constructed and if signs would be part of the construction.
Carleton Moore, stated that because of drainage and maintenance, speed bumps are not
constructed in alleys and there has not been a real problem with speeding in alleys, but if it does
9
occur, the problem would be addressed. He also stated that the alley is guaranteed for 20 years
and all maintenance and repair is guaranteed by the City for 20 years.
John Luse, Police Chief concurred that alley speeding has not been a recurring theme in
neighborhoods, but if speeding became a problem then it could be monitored.
Tim Lynch, 3744 France Avenue, asked what method was used to determine how the assessment
was allocated out to the properties affected.
Bruce Stepnick, City Assessor described the City’s assessment policy.
Mayor Dorfman closed the public hearing with the right of the Council to reopen it at a future
date.
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to adopt the
attached resolution establishing the assessment for Project No. 94-23. The motion passed 6-0.
6c. Amendment to Special Permit at 3401 Louisiana Avenue (Park Tavern) Case No.
98-26-CUP
Resolution # 98-111
Mr. Moore, Zoning Administrator, presented staff report and stated that the Planning
Commission recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the amendment to
the Special Permit subject to the conditions in the staff report.
Mayor Dorfman closed the public hearing with the right of the Council to reopen it at a future
date.
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Young, to adopt a
resolution approving the amendment subject to the conditions included in the staff report. The
motion passed 6-0.
6d. Holy Family Fall Festival Application
Resolution #98-112
Mayor Dorfman closed the public hearing with the right of the Council to reopen it at a future
date.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to approve the
temporary 3.2 beer license for September 11th, 12th, and 13th, 1998 and adopt the resolution
allowing for a temporary parking restriction. The motion passed 6-0.
6e. Resolution for Gambling Premises Permit for O’Tooles Pub at 4608 Excelsior Blvd.,
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
10
Mr. Meyer, City Manager explained that this item should be considered at the September 8th
meeting due to the fact that neighborhood notification had not been made.
Mayor Dorfman closed the public hearing with the right of the Council to reopen it at a future
date.
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Brimeyer, to close the
public hearing and defer decision on this item to meeting on September 8, 1998. The motion
passed 6-0.
7. PETITIONS, REQUESTS, COMMUNICATIONS
7a. Variance Appeal, 5911 Oxford Street
Case No. 5-98-VAR
Mr. Moore, Zoning Administrator, presented staff report and recommended that City Council
defer the variance request and direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment which would
permit the reconstruction of damaged or destroyed non-conforming accessory structures.
Councilmember Nelson favored deferring the variance request and directing staff to prepare an
ordinance amendment.
James Burt, 5911 Oxford Street, stated that he appreciated consideration of the permit and asked
if there was any possibility of expediting process to ensure completion before winter.
Mr. Moore stated that that staff would do everything possible to speed up process.
Councilmember Sanger asked how many times a person could keep coming back with a variance
request after being denied.
Mr. Moore, stated that a person can reapply 6 months after a variance has been denied.
Mr. Scott, City Attorney asked the applicant if he agreed to waive the 60 day requirement so that
the City Council could consider the ordinance amendment.
James Burt, 5911 Oxford Street, agreed to waive the 60 day requirement.
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to defer the
variance request and direct staff to prepare an ordinance amendment which would permit the
reconstruction of damaged or destroyed non-conforming accessory structures. The motion
passed 6-0.
8. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
8a. Possession of Knives or Edged Weapons in School Zones Ordinance
11
John Luse, Chief of Police, explained how that the ordinance proposal originated and the need to
capture cases similar to the fourteen cases which have been lost during the past two years.
Mayor Dorfman asked Mr. Luse to characterize the problem of possession of weapons in schools,
both public and private, in St. Louis Park.
Mr. Luse stated that the problem of weapons in St. Louis Park schools was extraordinarily rare,
there has been very few incidences and the mission was to keep it that way.
Lance Boole, 7711 13th Lane, asked if there was an age breakdown of the 14 cases.
Mr. Luse stated that he would research this data and make it available to Mr. Boole.
Councilmember Nelson questioned the amount of involvement of the School Board.
Mr. Luse stated that he has had discussions with the School Board and has not received any
opposition to ordinance proposal.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Young, to waive first
reading of ordinance with the deletion of paragraph B2 of the draft ordinance.
Councilmember Jacobs was in support of the ordinance, but preferred to leave the exemption
language in the ordinance.
Councilmember Nelson was in support of the ordinance, but was against the deletion of
paragraph B2 because it made possession of these weapons the offense and not the use of the
weapons.
Mayor Dorfman stated that past discussions revolved around having a zero tolerance policy about
weapons in our schools which should be regarding any weapons in schools at any time.
The motion passed 5-1. Councilmember Nelson opposed.
9. REPORTS FROM OFFICERS, BOARDS, COMMITTEES
9a. Planning Commission Minutes of July 15, 1998
By consent, Council accepted report for filing.
9b. Housing Authority Minutes of July 8, 1998
By consent, Council accepted report for filing.
9c. Vendor Claim Report
12
By consent, Council accepted report for filing.
10. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
10a. Board and Commission Appointment(s)
It was moved by Councilmember Young, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs to appoint Bill
McMillan to the Fire Civil Service Commission and Mary Jean Overand to the Cable Television
Commission. The motion passed 6-0.
11. NEW BUSINESS
11a. Authorization to advertise and receive bids for purchase of Granular Activated
Carbon.
Resolution # 98-114
By consent, Council moved to adopt the attached resolution accepting this report, ordering the
purchase of GAC, approving the specifications, and authorizing receipt of bids.
11b. School District #283 request for funding from Cable TV franchise fees
By consent, Council moved to approve the 1998 School District request for $25,000, and budget
up to $7,500 for an equipment grant in 1999 from Cable TV Franchise Fees, contingent upon the
receipt of further information requested of the School District.
12. MISCELLANEOUS - NONE
13. CLAIMS, APPROPRIATIONS, CONTRACT PAYMENTS - NONE
14. COMMUNICATIONS - NONE
15. ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adjourn the
meeting at 8:34 p.m. The motion passed 6-0.
City Clerk Mayor
13
Item # 4b
OFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
August 10, 1998
The meeting convened at 6:15 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Jeff Jacobs, Susan Sanger, Ron Latz, Robert
Young, Jim Brimeyer and Mayor Gail Dorfman.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Meyer); Director of Community Development (Mr.
Harmening); Planning Manager (Ms. Jeremiah); Planning Coordinator (Ms. Erickson);
Recreation Coordinator (Ms. Buskey); Facility Coordinator (Mr. Ailes); and City Clerk (Ms.
Larsen)
1. Park Commons Discussion
Community Development Staff updated the Council regarding activities related to the Park
Commons redevelopment. Ms. Jeremiah commented on the status of the Park Commons West
Study and informed council that the contract with Ellerbe-Beckett for design services had
reached the end of its term. The contract will not be renewed and staff is currently looking at
other options for consultant services.
CB asked if the Task Force had been updated regarding changes in schedule. Ms. Jeremiah said
that they had not, but a meeting will be scheduled to bring that group together in the very near
future.
Ms. Jeremiah presented to Council options for a Park Commons logo. One logo has been
selected as the most desirable for its design and flexibility of use for reproduction, etc.
Ms. Erickson stated that Comprehensive Plan amendments to allow for Livable Communities
principles to be applied in the Park Commons area have been reviewed by the Planning
commission and will be presented to Council for adoption very soon.
Ms. Jeremiah spoke about the solicitation process for developers for Park Commons. Staff have
identified the strongest applicant and are currently working through design issues. They agreed
to keep council informed throughout the selection process.
Mr. Meyer said that some developers are stronger in one area than another and that the
combination of developers working together on projects may change from time to time.
CS said that it is important for the first phase of development is done right to set the standard for
subsequent development in the area.
Mr. Harmening said that he had met with Mr. Jennings and a commercial consultant and that that
all parties are interested in proceeding with development plans. He also indicated that
negotiations for acquisition of the single family homes are proceeding and Wolfe Park work is
going well.
14
2. Knives and Weapons in Schools
Chief John Luse gave a background for the development of the ordinance saying that it was
necessary to put such an ordinance in place to give the Police Department options for dealing
with weapons in the schools. He indicated that the School Liaison officers are in place and
working well with students and school staff. Principals, the School Superintendent and other
school personnel are comfortable with the proposed ordinance.
Much discussion took place about a proposed exemption for persons over 21 and discretion
officers would be able to exhibit in enforcing the ordinance. Chief Luse said that the ordinance
is intended to provide officers with a tool to prosecute juvenile offenders which are currently
slipping through the juvenile court system. He stated that it was not the intent to enforce in
inappropriate situations, such as when a parent who happens to have a swiss army knife in their
pocket or on a key ring enters a school.
Councilmember Jacobs said that though that was not currently the intent, there is no guarantee in
the future that the ordinance may not be used inappropriately.
Mayor Dorfman asked that the exemption be removed, saying that she felt weapons should not
be allowed in the school by anyone. By leaving in the exemption, she felt it could be construed
that Council endorsed adults carrying weapons.
Following discussion Council directed staff to bring back the ordinance to the next Council
meeting with the exemption. Council also indicated that further discussion could take place
about the exemption at that time.
3. Update on Recreation Center pool Season
Ken Ailes, Recreation Facility Coordinator made a brief presentation to Council and showed a
video tape recorded from a WCCO news investigation about area pools. That news report
indicated that St. Louis Park’s Rec Center pool was considered to be one of the best in the area.
Councilmembers asked several questions about usage, operations and finances. They also
discussed banquet facility marketing, senior usage, and availability of seating around the pool.
4. Frauenshuh Development Proposal
Community Development staff and developers met with Council to outline the current status of
the Frauenshuh proposal for the Development of the southwest quadrant of Highway 7 and
Louisiana Avenue and to address the economic issues confronting the proposal.
Mr. Anderson explained that the financing approach has changed form TIF to tax abatement and
gave a review of how the tax abatement option would work. He also provides information
regarding the use of public funds for land acquisition, site preparation, soils correction,
infrastructure, site planning and engineering and environmental indemnity.
He also stated that the site is a strong candidate for targeted redevelopment and environmental
grant programs run through the state and the Metropolitan Council. Options for insurance
against unforeseen environmental costs associated with the project were discussed.
15
Councilmember Sanger asked if there was existing policy for dealing with tax abatement. Mr.
Anderson responded that the criteria would be very similar to the existing TIF policy and the
same “but for” tests could be applied.
Councilmember Sanger questioned what public benefits would come from this development.
Mr. Anderson stated that though the proposal looks messy on the surface, it will be structured so
that the City will benefit in the future by developing the property, remediating the environmental
problems, retaining existing business that will otherwise leave the City and job creation.
Councilmember Brimeyer stated that he felt if public dollars were not invested no development
would occur on the site and the City would continue to hold onto undeveloped environmentally
challenged property.
Dr. Saliterman spoke about the the interest of other firms to join in the project and stressed the
importance of quick action to remain competitive.
Mr. Harmening told Council that this is not an unusual financial arrangement for brownfield
development proposals.
Mayor Dorfman asked what progress had been made so far regarding soil testing. Mr. McKay
stated that both Frauenshuh and the MPCA were beginning testing of the soils.
Mr. Harmening informed Council that staff needed to know if they wished to pursue negotiations
with the School and the County as both would be affected by the tax abatement.
Councilmember Young was opposed to going ahead with the proposal. Other Councilmembers
were in favor of continuing.
5. Sidewalk and Trail Study, Process Alternatives
Staff met with Council to discuss various alternatives to include public participation in the trail
and sidewalk study. Ms. Erickson said that the tow reasons for seeking public input were to
achieve community consensus and community buy in. She presented various alternatives for
citizen participation, all of which would include a random telephone survey.
Council discussed the use of focus groups, a charrette, establishing a task force and the pros and
cons of each alternative. Following discussion it was agreed that the Task Force should be
established and that neighborhood meetings and open houses should be held.
Staff agreed to present council with options for task force members at the meeting of September
14th.
6. Radar Trailer
Councilmember Nelson had asked that a discussion take place regarding funding for acquisition
of a radar trailer for the police department.
Chief Luse and Mr. Meyer stated that money was available in the 1999 budget. Council
endorsed the purchase of the radar trailer.
16
7. Golden Auto Site/Railroad Connection proposal and Project Manager Scope of Work
Staff met with council to discuss the draft Scope of Work for a Project Manager to serve on
behalf of the city in carrying out the roles and tasks outlined in the preliminary development
agreement between the City of St. Louis Park, St. Louis Park EDA and Hennepin County.
Mr. Anderson said that they wanted to know if Council was comfortable with the scope of work
and if the time frame and budget was acceptable.
Mayor Dorfman said that the reason this is needed is that Council needs to be able to understand
the “big picture” of railroad development. She felt this process would answer questions.
Councilmember Sanger questioned whether a consultant could get any more information out of
the railroad companies than staff and Councilmembers had gotten.
Mr. Meyer said that we may not have been asking the right questions. A consultant can do much
more than staff in the area of research.
Councilmember Sanger was concerned that issues like safety and environmental concerns were
not addressed adequately in the scope of work
Mr. Koppy responded that the need for an understanding of the regional picture is needed before
environmental work could be done. He and Mr. Anderson explained that this was phase I of the
scope of work and that following a significant amount of research the City would be better
equipped to deal with safety and environmental concerns.
Mr. Koppy elaborated on certain points that may not be worded clearly and offered to flesh out
the scope of work to address council concerns.
Councilmember Sanger asked if the Railroad Task Force would be re-established. Mr. Koppy
responded that they will indeed be included along with other interested parties.
Mr. Meyer said that other real issues need to be examined such as the future of commuter rail in
St. Louis Park.
Councilmember Sanger said that she was concerned with the suitability of Mr. Koppy to serve as
Project Manager. Her concerns were qualifications, potential conflict of interest and concerns
about Mr. Koppy’s past actions as a City employee.
Mayor Dorfman pointed out that any person who had served as a public employee would have
some opposition and that controversy would be inevitable no matter who was hired.
Mr. Koppy gave a history of his professional career and expressed his desire to work with the
City.
Councilmember Sanger also expressed concern with a potential conflict of interest because
Councilmember Brimeyer had at one time been a business partner of Mr. Koppy.
Councilmember Brimeyer stated for the record that he had terminated his connections to Mr.
Koppy’s company prior to running for Council several years ago. He stated that her concerns
were unfounded.
Mr. Koppy commented on Councilmember Brimeyer character stating that he did not know
anyone with higher standards in conducting government business.
17
Following discussion it was agreed that staff should present to Council for formal action the
scope of work and professional services agreement.
8. Communications
Mr. Meyer informed Council of an upcoming meeting with finalists for the position of Parks and
Recreation Director.
The meeting adjourned at 10:15 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
18
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 6a
Meeting of September 8, 1998
6a. Conditional Use Permit at 3120 Glenhurst Avenue
Case No 98-24-CUP
Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a 124 unit apartment building and
separate property management building at 3120 Glenhurst Avenue
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the conditional use
permit subject to conditions included in the resolution
Zoning: R-4, Multiple Family Residential
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Residential up to 30 units per acre
Background:
Klodt Development (Albrecht Family Partners II; KK-Five Corportation) is proposing to build a
124-unit, market rate apartment building on a 4.29 acre parcel at 3120 Glenhurst Avenue. The
proposed density of the project is 28.9 units per acre. The property is north of two sets of
railroad tracks, which are owned by the Soo Line Railroad and Hennepin Parks respectively, and
south of multifamily and single family housing. Access to and from the site is via Inglewood
Avenue, which connects to Highway 7. The proposed building consists of four stories of
apartments with two stories of underground parking, with the parking levels being partially
exposed on the south, east and west elevations. The building exterior is proposed to be a
combination of brick, stucco, and rock face concrete block. In addition to the 126 underground
parking stalls, 124 surface parking spaces are proposed on the site, with 25 of those spaces
shown as proof of parking. A 3,000 square foot property management/storage building is
proposed on the west side of the site as well. An outdoor swimming pool is planned as an
additional amenity.
The developer is proposing to use an adjacent site, which is located in Minneapolis, for ponding
purposes for this project. Minneapolis is also requiring a Conditional Use Permit, which has not
yet been processed.
Hennepin Parks is requesting a trail easement across the south few feet of this property and the
parcel to be used for ponding, to accommodate a proposed regional biking/walking trail. The
revised site plan and grading plan accommodates the trail easement.
A Conditional Use Permit is required for this development for multifamily housing in the R-4
District. A Conditional Use Permit is also required for the property management building to
place more than one principal building on one lot.
19
The property is required to be replatted, as it currently consists of three separate lots of an
Auditor’s Subdivision. However, the city attorney has determined that park dedication fees
cannot be required in this instance. The combined preliminary and final plat were considered by
the Planning Commission and a public hearing held on August 19, 1998. The Planning
Commission recommended approval, noting one concern regarding pedestrian safety that is
discussed later in this report. The preliminary and final plat will likely be considered by the City
Council on September 22, 1998.
The Planning Commission reviewed the CUP on August 5, 1998 and recommended approval.
There were concerns voiced over whether all areas counted as usable open space were truly
usable, particularly the sloped area north of the proposed apartment building, and whether
Minneapolis would approve use of the adjacent site for ponding. These issues are discussed later
in the report.
The apartment building exceeds the height limitations for the R-4 district and was required to
obtain a height variance from the Board of Zoning Appeals (BOZA). BOZA approved the
variance for a four story, 44-foot high building on July 23, 1998.
A Watershed District permit is required for the project. The Watershed District will consider this
project on October 8, 1998.
Issues:
• What issues exist with regard to other agencies and jurisdictions?
• Does the proposal meet the Conditional Use Permit requirements for multi-family housing?
• Does the proposal meet the Conditional Use Permit requirements for more than one principal
building on one lot?
• Is there adequate pedestrian access within and from the site?
• Does the proposal meet other applicable provisions of the zoning code?
• Are there any other issues to be addressed?
What issues exist with regard to other agencies and jurisdictions?
City of Minneapolis: The property proposed for ponding for this site is located in the city of
Minneapolis. Minneapolis has determined that a Conditional Use Permit is required to use the
site for ponding. The CUP is scheduled to be considered by the Minneapolis Planning
Commission on September 28. Staff is recommending that approval of the St. Louis Park CUP
be made contingent upon approval of the CUP for Minneapolis, and that no site work be
permitted until the developer provides evidence either that the CUP has been approved or that
Minneapolis is aware that site work is beginning on the SLP site and has no objections. In
addition, the SLP Conditional Use Permit would be recorded against both properties, with the
condition that the Minneapolis site be maintained for stormwater ponding purposes in perpetuity.
20
Watershed District: The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District was originally scheduled to
consider the Klodt project at their September 10 meeting. However, they have delayed
consideration of the project until the Minneapolis CUP has been approved, probably to the
October 8 meeting. In addition to the proposed ponding, the developer is proposing to pay fees
as the pond would not meet N.U.R.P. standards for depth. Staff is recommending that the
developer obtain a Watershed District permit prior to beginning any site work.
Hennepin Parks Regional Trail: A regional trail is proposed for the railroad right of way just
south of this parcel, and the trail and trail buffer would encroach slightly on this parcel. A 7 to
10 foot wide easement is being requested. The developer has modified the site plan to
accommodate the trail easement, and has provided sidewalks linking the trail to the development.
An easement is also being requested over parts of the ponding site for an on-grade trail crossing
across the railroad tracks. The grading and ponding plans have been modified to accommodate
the trail and still provide the same amount of on-site ponding. Staff is recommending that as a
condition of CUP approval, the developer be required to cooperate with Hennepin Parks to
accommodate the trail easement and grading for the trail, and that such easement be recorded
prior to final plat approval by the City Council.
Does the proposal meet the Conditional Use Permit requirements for multi-family housing?
The Zoning Ordinance permits multiple family housing including apartments in the R-4 district
with a Conditional Use Permit, subject to certain conditions. This proposal meets these
requirements as outlined below:
a. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a collector or arterial
or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating significant
traffic on local residential streets.
Access to and from the site is via Inglewood Avenue, which is a local street, which then connects
to Highway 7, which is an arterial. Staff believes this arrangement will not generate significant
traffic on local streets. Inglewood Avenue connects directly to Highway 7 and the frontage road
within 1 1/2 blocks, and there is no reason that future residents would use other adjacent local
streets for through access. The character of Inglewood Avenue and this neighborhood south of
Highway 7 is mostly multifamily with some older single family housing, so the street already
serves a somewhat higher level of traffic. The single family neighborhood is zoned for
redevelopment to multifamily housing of the same density as this proposal.
b. Building lots shall contain a minimum 400 square feet of usable open space per dwelling
unit, and no more than 1/2 can be located in the front yard.
The site plan shows 55,355 square feet of usable open space. With 124 units, the project requires
a minimum of 49,600 square feet. The Planning Commission at the August 19 meeting
expressed concern that some of the area counted as usable open space was not actually “usable.”
The usable open space includes the sloped area north of the apartment, which is not suitable for
active recreation, but can be used for some types of passive recreation. In addition, there is an
21
outdoor swimming pool proposed on site. Given that the development consists of mostly studios
and one bedrooms and is unlikely to attract many families with children, and given the additional
amenity of the pool, staff believes that the amount of open space provided is adequate.
c. The minimum spacing between building shall be the average heights of the buildings.
The two buildings on the property are spaced over 400 feet apart, which is well over the height of
either building. Therefore, this condition is met.
d. Side and rear yards may be reduced to zero feet where dwellings are designed to share
common walls.
As the dwelling units are not individually owned and are contained within one building, this
condition is met.
e. All buildings shall be located a minimum of 15 feet from the back of the curb line of internal
private roadways or parking lots.
This requirement is met.
f. No portion of the required 20 foot road system may be used to satisfy the off-street parking
requirements.
This provision is met. There is no private road proposed, only an internal driveway and parking
areas. Parking areas are clearly delineated from driveway areas.
Does the proposal meet the Conditional Use Permit requirements for more than one
building on one lot?
The proposal includes a separate 3,000 square foot building which will be used for a property
management office and as leasable storage space for tenants’ recreational vehicles and other large
items. A CUP is required for more than one principal building on one lot. Conditions for
approval are that the building comply with all applicable provisions of the Zoning Code. The R-
4 district permits property management offices as a permitted accessory use, with the floor area
not to exceed 10% of the gross floor area of the main building. This requirement is met. The
building meets the minimum setback requirements. The exterior materials are brick and rock
face block, which meet the exterior materials requirements and are compatible with the proposed
apartment building.
Is there adequate pedestrian access within and from the site?
Per staff’s recommendation, the developer has revised the site plan to show sidewalks throughout
the development. The sidewalks would provide good pedestrian access within the site between
parking areas, the building, pool area, and open space; and will link up with the proposed
regional trail to the south and any future sidewalks along Inglewood Avenue. The sidewalk
22
shown on the latest plan does not extend all the way to the east parking lot, and staff is
recommending that the site plan be revised to show this.
At the August 19 Planning Commission meeting to discuss the preliminary and final plat for this
proposal, the Planning Commission noted some concern for pedestrian safety, given the long
unbroken driving lane from the property’s entrance to the east parking lot. One solution is
placement of stop signs to slow traffic down. In addition, the proposed sidewalk connections to
the future regional trail should be moved to safer locations. Staff is recommending that the
developer work with staff to revise the site plan prior to City Council consideration of the final
plat to show safe sidewalk links to trails and stop signs where necessary.
Does the proposal meet other applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance?
R-4 Dimensional Standards/Densities: All dimensional standards and densities are met except
for height. A height variance was obtained from BOZA on July 23 for a 44 foot high building. It
should be noted that the measurement is taken from the adjacent street curb, and that the south
elevation is more than 44 feet from ground grade. However, the additional height is offset by the
fact that the building is on a steep slope which drops approximately 20 feet between the
residences to the north and the ground grade of this building at the south elevation. In addition,
there are many trees being retained on the slope which will provide a buffer for the building. The
proposed density of the project is 28.9 units per acre, which is within the 30 unit per acre
maximum.
Standards for Conditional Use Permits: The proposed development complies with the standards
for Conditional Use Permits. The proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan. This property and the residential property to the north is guided for residential use up to 30
units per acre, whereas this proposal is for a density of 28.9 units per acre. The project supports
the Comprehensive Plan’s goal of increasing the amount of quality multifamily housing in the
City. In addition, this parcel falls within the Highway 7 TIF redevelopment district, although no
public assistance is being requested. The project will not be detrimental to surrounding
properties. While the density is higher than the housing to the north, the building’s impact is
reduced as noted above by the topography and trees on the site, and the housing to the north is
anticipated to redevelop in the future. Several conditions to the CUP have been recommended by
staff to ensure that the project complies with the Zoning Ordinance and Comprehensive Plan.
General Residential District Regulations: The development is expected to comply with all
residential restrictions and performance standards.
Architectural Design: The building is a single rectangle with hip roof, with balconies and
dormers on the north and south facades. The exterior materials are proposed to be primarily
brick and rock face concrete block, with stucco behind the balcony areas. The developer had
originally submitted elevations showing vinyl siding in excess of 10% on some elevations. The
Zoning Administrator determined that vinyl siding is a Class 3 material and cannot exceed 10%
on any facade. Therefore the developer has revised the building elevations, and all facades
comply with the exterior materials standards. The proposed property management building is
23
brick and rock face block. It also complies with the exterior materials standards, and is
compatible with the apartment building. Staff is recommending that the color of the materials of
the two buildings match.
Tree preservation: The applicant submitted a preliminary tree replacement plan which complied
with Ordinance requirements and included loss and replacement of about 1/3 of the trees on the
site. Because of some changes to the proposed grading on the slope north of the apartment
building, the specific trees to be removed have changed, but the total number of tree inches being
removed has not increased. Staff is recommending that a revised plan showing the trees to be
removed be submitted and approved prior to final plat approval.
Landscaping: The proposed landscape plans comply with the City’s landscape and bufferyard
requirements and the tree preservation ordinance including the changes mentioned above. Most
of the trees on the slope north of the proposed building would be preserved. Replacement trees
and other landscaping is proposed to increase the buffer between the apartment building and the
residences to the north and throughout the rest of the site.
What other issues need to be addressed for this project?
Grading and utility plans: Some changes have been made to the grading and utility plans since
the Planning Commission considered the CUP. Some slopes to the north of the apartment
building were modified and some proposed retaining walls were removed from the plans. In
addition, the ponding area on the Minneapolis site was modified to accommodate the proposed
regional trail crossover. Final grading, erosion control, and utility plans have been submitted to
the City, and must be approved by the Public Works Department prior to City Council
consideration of the final plat.
Fire Department: The Fire Department is in the process of determining whether the property
management building must be sprinklered. The Fire Department also had some more technical
comments on the building floor plans. These comments must be addressed as a condition of
CUP approval prior to any building permits being issued.
Retaining walls: Construction details are needed on the retaining walls shown on the site plan.
In addition, any retaining walls that are planned for the site are required to be shown on the site
plan prior to City Council consideration of the final plat.
Platting: The property is required to be replatted as a condition of approving the CUP. The
combined preliminary and final plat have been considered by the Planning Commission on
August 19, which recommended approval with some concerns noted. Assuming conditions are
met, this request will come before the City Council on September 22, 1998.
Other agencies/jurisdictions: As discussed earlier in the report, approval is required from other
agencies and jurisdictions including the City of Minneapolis for the ponding site and the
Watershed District. Staff is also recommending that a trail easement for the Hennepin Parks trail
24
be recorded prior to final plat approval and that Hennepin Parks approve the grading plan for the
future trail site.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit for multiple family housing and a
separate property management building subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibits A through
K, with Exhibits A, E and H to be revised as noted below, and Exhibits B, C, and D to be
approved by Public Works as noted below, such documents incorporated by reference
herein.
2. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon preliminary and final plat
approval, filing of the final plat, and City of Minneapolis approval of the CUP for the
proposed ponding site.
3. The two adjacent lots in Minneapolis are to be retained in perpetuity for use as a functional
stormwater pond. The CUP shall be recorded with Hennepin County against the main
building site (Lot 1, Block 1, Inglewood Trails) and against the two lots in Minneapolis
(Lots 1 and 2 of Auditor’s Subdivision 267).
4. Prior to City Council consideration of the final plat, the following is required from the
applicant:
a) A trail easement which accommodates the Hennepin Parks proposed regional trail shall
be
recorded against the subject property and the ponding site in Minneapolis. The easement
shall meet the needs of Hennepin Parks for the regional trail.
b) Final grading, utility, and erosion control plans must be approved by the Public Works
Department. Grading plans for the trail easement must also be approved by Hennepin
Parks.
c) The grading plan and revised site plan must show the location of all retaining walls to be
built on the site. The revised site plan must also show the sidewalk extending all the way to
the east parking lot, and the developer shall work with staff to provide safe sidewalk links to
the future regional trail and stop signs where necessary, site plan to be revised to reflect
these
changes.
d) The tree inventory plan and landscape plans must be revised to show trees to be
removed on the site. If the total number of tree inches to be removed is greater than that
shown on the existing tree replacement plan, a revised tree replacement plan shall be
submitted prior to City Council consideration of the final plat which complies with the
tree replacement ordinance.
5. Prior to any site work, the following is required from the applicant:
a) A copy of the Watershed District permit and evidence of approval of any other relevant
agencies or jurisdictions.
b) A letter or other form of approval from the City of Minneapolis which either states that
25
use of the Minneapolis site is approved for ponding, or, that the City of Minneapolis is
aware that site work is beginning on the St. Louis Park site and has no objection to
beginning site work.
c) Approval and evidence of filing of the final plat or agreement on the part of the
applicant that such site work is at the applicant’s own risk.
d) A letter of credit in an amount of 125% of the cost of tree replacement.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant is required to comply with the
following:
a) Lighting plans, irrigation plans, construction details on retaining walls, and exterior
materials and colors of the apartment building and property management building to be
submitted by the applicant and approved by the City.
b) All requirements of the Fire Department must be met, including sprinklering of the
property management building if the Fire Marshall determines that this is required.
c) The applicant shall sign the assent form and official exhibits.
7. The project shall comply with the General Residential District Regulations of the Zoning
Code.
8. If parking problems occur, or when directed by the Zoning Administrator, the applicant
shall implement the proof of parking plan.
Attachments: Conditional Use Permit Resolution
On File in City Clerk’s Office:
Site Location Map
Exhibit A, Site Plan
Exhibit B, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Exhibit C, Grading and Erosion Control Plan
Exhibit D, Utility Plan
Exhibit E, Tree Inventory Plan
Exhibit F, Details
Exhibit G, Details
Exhibit H, Landscape and Tree Replacement Plan
Exhibit I, Floor Plans
Exhibit J, Apartment Buiding Elevations
Exhibit K, Property Management Building Elevations
Prepared by: Sacha Peterson, Planning Associate 928-2841
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
26
RESOLUTION NO. _____
A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT UNDER
SECTION 14:5-4.5.D. OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF A 124 UNIT
APARTMENT BUILDING AND A 3,000 SQUARE FOOT PROPERTY
MANAGMENT BUILDING FOR PROPERTY ZONED R-4, MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT LOCATED AT 3120 GLENHURST
AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. Albrecht Family Partners II (KK-Five Corporation) has made application to the City
Council for a Conditional Use Permit under Section 14:5-4.5.D. of the St. Louis Park
Ordinance Code for the purpose of constructing a 124 unit apartment building and a 3,000
square foot property management building within a R-4, Multiple Family Residential District
located at 3120 Glenhurst Avenue for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
See Attached Legal Description
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 98-24-CUP) and the effect of the proposed 124 unit apartrment building
and management building on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding
lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the
surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the
intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The Council has determined that the 124 unit apartment building and property management
building will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor
will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding
property values, and the proposed apartment building and management building are in harmony
with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
27
4. The contents of Planning Case File 98-24-CUP are hereby entered into and made part of
the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Conditional Use Permit to permit construction of a 124 unit apartment building and 3,000
square foot management building at the location described is granted based on the findings set
forth above and subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibits A through
K, with Exhibits A, E and H to be revised as noted below, and Exhibits B, C, and D to be
approved by Public Works as noted below, such documents incorporated by reference
herein.
2. Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon preliminary and final plat
approval, filing of the final plat, and City of Minneapolis approval of the CUP for the
proposed ponding site.
3. The two adjacent lots in Minneapolis are to be retained in perpetuity for use as a functional
stormwater pond. The CUP shall be recorded with Hennepin County against the main
building site (Lot 1, Block 1, Inglewood Trails) and against the two lots in Minneapolis
(Lots 1 and 2 of Auditor’s Subdivision 267).
4. Prior to City Council consideration of the final plat, the following is required from the
applicant:
a) A trail easement which accommodates the Hennepin Parks proposed regional trail shall
be
recorded against the subject property and the ponding site in Minneapolis. The easement
shall meet the needs of Hennepin Parks for the regional trail.
b) Final grading, utility, and erosion control plans must be approved by the Public Works
Department. Grading plans for the trail easement must also be approved by Hennepin
Parks.
c) The grading plan and revised site plan must show the location of all retaining walls to be
built on the site. The revised site plan must also show the sidewalk extending all the way to
the east parking lot, and the developer shall work with staff to provide safe sidewalk links to
the future regional trail and stop signs where necessary, site plan to be revised to reflect
these
changes.
d) The tree inventory plan and landscape plans must be revised to show trees to be
removed on the site. If the total number of tree inches to be removed is greater than that
shown on the existing tree replacement plan, a revised tree replacement plan shall be
submitted prior to City Council consideration of the final plat which complies with the
tree replacement ordinance.
5. Prior to any site work, the following is required from the applicant:
a) A copy of the Watershed District permit and evidence of approval of any other relevant
agencies or jurisdictions.
b) A letter or other form of approval from the City of Minneapolis which either states that
28
use of the Minneapolis site is approved for ponding, or, that the City of Minneapolis is
aware that site work is beginning on the St. Louis Park site and has no objection to
beginning site work.
c) Approval and evidence of filing of the final plat or agreement on the part of the
applicant that such site work is at the applicant’s own risk.
d) A letter of credit in an amount of 125% of the cost of tree replacement.
6. Prior to issuance of any building permit, the applicant is required to comply with the
following:
a) Lighting plans, irrigation plans, construction details on retaining walls, and exterior
materials and colors of the apartment building and property management building to be
submitted by the applicant and approved by the City.
b) All requirements of the Fire Department must be met, including sprinklering of the
property management building if the Fire Marshall determines that this is required.
c) The applicant shall sign the assent form and official exhibits.
7. The project shall comply with the General Residential District Regulations of the Zoning
Code.
8. If parking problems occur, or when directed by the Zoning Administrator, the applicant
shall implement the proof of parking plan.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
98-24:N/res/ord
29
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #6b
Meeting of September 8, 1998
6b. Public Hearing on the Resolution Giving Preliminary Approval to the
Refinancing of Park Ridge Apartments Revenue Bonds and Authorizing the
Execution and Delivery of an Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of
Expenses; and Authorizing Preparation of Necessary Documents
The resolution would give preliminary approval to the issuance of revenue bonds
for the Park Ridge Associates, Limited Partnership. Proceeds from the sale of the
bonds will be used to refinance the acquisition and rehabilitation of Park Ridge
Apartments, a 93-unit multi-family housing project located at 2480 South Highway
100.
The resolution also authorizes the execution of related documents including
application to the Department of Trade and Economic Development for approval of
the refinancing.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to approve the
resolution .
Background:
The City first authorized the issuance $2,455,000 of mortgage revenue bonds for this project in
1985 This request will provide for the refinancing of this debt. Proceeds from the sale will be
used to refinance the existing mortgage and provide funds for rehabilitation of the apartment
building.
Representatives of Park Ridge Associates Limited Partnership have submitted the appropriate
forms of application to the City along with the $1,500 application fee. A copy of the complete
application is not included with this report. Copies are available for review from the Director of
Finance.
Paul Tietz, the City’s Bond Counsel, and representatives from Park Ridge Associated will attend
the public hearing and be available to answer any questions.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached resolution be approved to give preliminary approval to the
project and its financing.
30
Attachments:
• Resolution, including Attachment A, Indemnity Agreement between the City and Park Ridge
Associates
Prepared by: Kathleen McBride, Director of Finance
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
31
RESOLUTION NO.98 - ____
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO REFINANCING
A PROJECT THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF REVENUE
REFUNDING BONDS; AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
OF AN AGREEMENT AS TO INDEMNITY AND PAYMENT OF EXPENSES;
AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota (the “City”), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1 Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 462C, Chapter 462A and Chapter 475, as amended
(the “Act”), authorize the City to issue revenue bonds to finance programs or developments
described in any housing plan, upon approval of the program as provided in the Act, including
one or more rental housing developments within its boundaries and to refund any bonds then
outstanding including the payment of any redemption premiums thereon and any interest accrued
or to accrue to the redemption date next succeeding the date of delivery of the refunding bonds.
1.2 The Home Rule Charter of the City authorizes the issuance of bonds “for any public
purpose not prohibited by law”.
1.3 On September 4, 1985, the City issued its $2,455,000 aggregate principal amount
Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1985 (Park Ridge Apartments Project), pursuant to the Act (the
“Series 1985 Bonds”), to finance the acquisition, construction and equipping of a 93 unit,
MultiFamily apartment complex located in the City at 2480 South Highway 100, St. Louis Park,
Minnesota (the “Project”) by Park Ridge Associates Limited Partnership (the “Borrower”), a
Minnesota limited partnership.
1.4 The Council has received a proposal from the Borrower that the City issue its rental
revenue refunding bonds (the “Bonds”) in one or more series in an aggregate principal amount of
approximately $2,600,000 to refund all of the outstanding principal amount of the Series 1985
Bonds.
1.5 The City hereby finds and determines the issuance of the Bonds is authorized under
the Act and the City’s Home Rule Charter and constitutes a public purpose under the City’s
Home Rule Charter for which bonds can be issued.
1.6 Section 147(f)(2)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the
“Code”), and Section 1313(b)(3)(A) of the Tax Reform Act of 1986 require a public hearing
following reasonable public notice prior to the approval of the Bonds by the Council.
1.7 The City has published a public notice for a public hearing on September 8, 1998 in
the officiale newspaper of the City and has held such public hearing .
32
1.8 The City hereby finds and determines that prior to proceeding with the proposed
issuance of the Bonds, the City requires the Borrower to authorize, execute and deliver to the
City an Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of Fees and Expenses (the “Agreement”),
substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A and in form and substance acceptable to the
Mayor, City Manager and City Clerk herein authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the
City.
1.9 This Council has been advised by representatives of the Borrower that (i)
conventional commercial financing to refinance the cost of the Project is available only on a
limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that, with the aid of municipal borrowing, and
its resulting lower borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible, and (ii) the
refinancing of the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of tax exempt revenue
bond financing.
1.10 This Council has also been advised by underwriters to the Borrower that, on the
basis of their discussions with potential buyers of tax-exempt bonds, revenue bonds and
refunding revenue bonds of the City could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to
finance the Project.
SECTION 2
Determination to Proceed with
the Project and its Financing
2.1 On the basis of the information given the City to date, it appears that it would be
desirable of the City to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to refinance the
Project in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $2,600,000.
2.2 It is hereby determined to proceed with the Project and its refinancing and this
Council hereby declares its present intent to have the City issue its revenue bonds under its Home
Rule Charter and the Act to refinance the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the
adoption of this resolution shall not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the
City or its City Council to issue such revenue bonds. All details of such revenue bond issue and
the provisions for payment thereof shall be subject to such further conditions as the City may
specify. The revenue bonds, if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or
equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues specifically pledged to the payment
thereof, and each bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in substance that the bonds, including
interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and property specifically pledged to the
payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City within the meaning of any
constitutional, statutory or charter limitation.
2.3 This resolution and the intentions set forth herein are subject to the members of the
Borrower entering into the Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of Expenses, between the
City and the Borrower substantially in the form approved by this resolution with such changes as
approved by the City Manager.
33
2.4 Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association is hereby designated as Bond Counsel
and is authorized to proceed with the preparation of documents as directed by the Borrower.
SECTION 3
Authorization of An Agreement as to
Indemnity and Payment of Expenses
3.1 The form of Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of Expenses presented to this
meeting is hereby approved in substantially the form so presented for use in connection with the
revenue bonds which may be issued to refinance the Project, and the Mayor, City Manager and
City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such an agreement by and between the City and the
City of St. Louis Park with such changes, additions or deletions as the Mayor, City Manager and
Clerk deem appropriate.
SECTION 4
General
4.1 If the bonds are issued and sold, the City will enter into a loan agreement or similar
agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act (the “Revenue Agreement”) with the Borrower.
The loan payments or other amounts payable by the Borrower to the City under the Revenue
Agreement shall be sufficient to pay the principal of, and interest and redemption premium, if
any, on the bonds as and when the same become due and payable.
4.2 This resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and without
publication.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
34
Draft 8/27/98
Exhibit A
______________________________________________
AGREEMENT
AS TO
INDEMNITY AND PAYMENT OF EXPENSES
AMONG
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
AND
PARK RIDGE ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
AND
LWA, L.L.P.
Dated as of September 1, 1998
______________________________________________
35
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into effective as of September 1, 1998, by
and among City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), Park Ridge Associates Limited
Partnership (the “Borrower”) and LWA, L.L.P. (the “General Partner”);
WHEREAS, the City has received a proposal that the City issue its bonds to refinance
the previous acquisition, construction and equipping of 93 unit MultiFamily house complex
located in the City at 2480 South Highway 100 (the “Project”), by the refunding of an
outstanding bond issue in the original principal amount of $2,455,000 (the “Prior Debt”) through
the issuance of its revenue refunding bonds (the “Bonds”) under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
462C, Chapter 462A and Chapter 475, as amended (the “Act”), and under the City’s Home Rule
Charter on behalf of the Borrower; and
WHEREAS, the City held a public hearing, to be held on September 8, 1998, on the
proposal to issue the Bonds, and published notice of such hearing; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of the public hearing is to give the public an opportunity to
express their views with respect to the proposal to refinance the Project, to refund the Prior Debt
and to issue the Bonds and to submit written comments to the City Clerk before the time of the
hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City, the Borrower and the General Partner desire to enter into this
Agreement to acknowledge the determinations of the City, the qualifications and restrictions
thereto, and to provide for the indemnity and allocation of expenses, all as more fully set forth
herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the parties agree as follows:
1. No Obligation to Issue. Until such time as the City, in its sole discretion, shall
adopt a final resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds, the Borrower and the General
Partner hereby acknowledge that the City shall have no legal or equitable obligation to issue such
Bonds and shall not be liable in any fashion for not issuing such Bonds. The Borrower and the
General Partner further acknowledge that all details of such revenue Bond issue and the
provisions for payment thereof may be subject to such further conditions as the City may specify.
2. Source of Repayment. The parties hereby acknowledge that the proposed Bonds, if
issued, shall not constitute a general obligation of the City or a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal
or equitable, upon any property of the City, except the revenues derived from the Borrower
specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each Bond, when, as and if issued, shall recite in
substance that the Bond, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the revenues and
property specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the City
within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation.
36
3. Indemnification by Borrower. The Borrower and the General Partner hereby agree,
jointly and severally, to pay and will protect, indemnify and save the City, the City Council, the
City’s officials and employees harmless from and against all liabilities, losses, damages, costs
and expenses (including attorneys’ reasonable fees and expenses), causes of action, suits, claims,
demands and judgments of any nature arising from the Project, the proposed refinancing of the
Project, the refunding the Prior Debt and the issuance of the Bonds, including, without limitation,
the calling of the public hearing, the publication of notice thereof, the adoption of any
preliminary or final resolution, the issuance and delivery of such Bonds and the offering of such
Bonds for resale.
4. Fees. The Borrower and the General Partner agree, jointly and severally, that
whether or not the Bonds are issued they will reimburse the City for direct costs and expenses
incurred in connection with the issuance, purchase and sale, payment, registration, transfer,
exchange or redemption of the Bonds, including, but not limited to, the fees and expenses of City
counsel, bond counsel, financial consultants, engineers, architects, attorneys, management
consultants, accountants or other consultants as may from time to time be retained by the City;
and on demand therefor, they will pay to the City the reasonable fees and expenses of Briggs and
Morgan, Professional Association, acting as counsel to and bond counsel for the City and all
other expenses incurred by the City in connection with consideration of refinancing the Project,
including, without limitation, the refinancing of the Prior Debt and the proposed Bond issue. The
Borrower and the General Partner agree, jointly and severally, that they will pay upon invoice
therefor the fees and expenses of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, as counsel to the
City and as bond counsel in connection with or relating to the proposed issuance of the Bonds
which, at the option of Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association, may be billed monthly for
work actually done and for expenses incurred through the date of such statement.
The Borrower and the General Partner acknowledge and agree that Briggs and Morgan,
Professional Association, acting as counsel to the issuer and bond counsel is representing the
City and as such is not representing the Borrower, notwithstanding the Borrower’s agreement to
reimburse the City for such firm’s fees and expenses. The Borrower and the General Partner
agree that Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association serving as bond counsel or issuer’s
counsel in connection with the issuance of the proposed Bonds shall not be a conflict with or in
any way preclude other representation by Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association of the
City in any matters, including those relating to the Borrower or the General Partner.
5. Separate Agreement. The Agreements as to indemnity and fees set forth in
Sections 3 and 4 above are separate from, and in addition to, any provisions, including, without
limitation, with respect to indemnity and payment of fees and expenses, which the City shall
require in the documentation executed in connection with the issuance of the Bonds.
6. Required Provisions. Pursuant to Resolution No. 90-112, the City has required as
follows:
(1) That parties benefited by the issuance of revenue bonds agree during the
life of the bonds, not to discriminate against any employee or applicant for
37
employment because of race, color, sex, creed, national origin, or age, or
on any other basis prohibited by Federal, State or local law and that parties
agree during the life of the bonds to provide equal employment
opportunities without regard to race, color, sex, creed, national origin, or
age. Further, such parties shall have in place and utilize affirmative action
employment practices.
(2) That fees in the following amounts paid to the City in connection with the
issuance of revenue bonds shall be required in addition to other amounts
or indemnities which may be required in connection with any issuance of
revenue bonds:
(1) Whether or not the bonds are issued, an amount to reimburse the
City for direct costs and expenses incurred in connection with the
issuance, purchase and sale, payment, registration, transfer,
exchange or redemption of the bonds, including, but not limited to,
the fees and expenses of City counsel, bond counsel, financial
consultants, engineers, architects, attorneys, management
consultants, accountants or other consultants as may from time to
time be retained by the City.
(2) In addition to the foregoing, an annual fee of one-eighth of one
percent per annum of the principal amount of the bond issue
outstanding, payable in arrears semi-annually on such dates as
determined by the City and calculated on the principal amount of
the bonds outstanding during the six months preceding the date on
which the payment is due.
38
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City has caused this Agreement to be executed in its
corporate name and attested by its duly authorized officers and caused its corporate seal to be
hereunto affixed and the Borrower has caused this Agreement to be executed in its corporate
name by its authorized officer, all as of the date first written above and all pursuant to the
authority granted in resolutions adopted by the Borrower and the City prior to the date hereof.
(SEAL)
ATTEST:
By_________________________________
Its City Clerk
PARK RIDGE ASSOCIATES,
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
By_________________________________
Its ________________________________
LWA, L.L.P.
By_________________________________
Its ________________________________
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK,
MINNESOTA
By_________________________________
Its Mayor
By_________________________________
Its City Manager
39
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8a
Meeting of September 8, 1998
8a. Resolution for Gambling Premises Permit for O’Tooles Pub at 4608 Excelsior
Boulevard
St. Louis Park Hockey Boosters Association Gambling Premises license at 4608
Excelsior Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the resolution approving the premises permit.
Background:
The St. Louis Park Hockey Boosters Association has submitted an application for a Gambling
Premises Permit at 4608 Excelsior Blvd. in St. Louis Park. The application is for a Class A
license which includes pulltabs. The Hockey Boosters holds a premises permit for Bunny’s
located at 4730 Excelsior Blvd which was approved by the Council on March 2, 1998.
This item was previously scheduled for council consideration at the meeting of August 17th.
Prior to that meeting it was discovered that notification of properties located within 350 feet of
the establishment had not been made. That notification is now complete and staff has received
no comments from the public regarding this matter.
The City Council must approve the license before it is submitted to the State Gambling Control
Board. A copy of the resolution passed by the Council will be submitted to the State.
Police Investigation:
The Police Department has reviewed the application. The principles have been investigated and
approved.
Attachments: Resolution
Application
Prepared by: Cindy Kaiser, Licensing/CSR, 924-2504
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
40
RESOLUTION NO.______________
A RESOLUTION OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A PREMISES PERMIT FOR LAWFUL
GAMBLING FOR THE ST. LOUIS PARK HOCKEY
BOOSTERS ASSOCIATION
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 and St. Louis Park Ordinance Section 13-
1600 , provide for lawful gambling licensing by the State Gambling Control Board; and
WHEREAS, a licensed organization may not conduct lawful gambling at any site unless
it has first obtained from the Board a premise permit for the site; and
WHEREAS, the Board may not issue or renew a premises permit unless the
organization submits a resolution from the City Council approving the premises permit;
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City of St. Louis Park City Council that the applicant listed
below meets the criteria necessary to receive a premises permit, and the application is hereby
approved
ST. LOUIS PARK HOCKEY BOOSTERS ASSOCIATION AT
O’TOOLES PUB AT 4608 EXCELSIOR BLVD., ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
41
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8b
Meeting of September 8, 1998
8b. Resolution for Gambling Premises Permit for Gipper’s Sports Bar at 4608
Excelsior Boulevard
Minnesota Youth Athletic Services Gambling Premises license at 4608 Excelsior
Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the Premises Permit.
Background:
The Minnesota Youth Athletic Services has submitted an application for a Gambling Premises
Permit at 4608 Excelsior Blvd. in St. Louis Park. The application is for a Class A license which
includes pulltabs.
All requirements for issuance of the license including notification of properties within 350 feet of
the establishment have been met.
The City Council must approve the license before it is submitted to the State Gambling Control
Board. A copy of the resolution passed by the Council will be submitted to the State.
Police Investigation:
The Police Department has reviewed the application. The principles have been investigated and
approved.
Attachments: Resolution
Application
Prepared by: Cindy Kaiser, Licensing/CSR, 924-2504
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
42
RESOLUTION NO.______________
A RESOLUTION OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A PREMISES PERMIT FOR LAWFUL
GAMBLING FOR THE MINNESOTA YOUTH ATHLETIC SERVICES
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 and St. Louis Park Ordinance Section 13-
1600 , provide for lawful gambling licensing by the State Gambling Control Board; and
WHEREAS, a licensed organization may not conduct lawful gambling at any site unless
it has first obtained from the Board a premise permit for the site; and
WHEREAS, the Board may not issue or renew a premises permit unless the
organization submits a resolution from the City Council approving the premises permit;
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City of St. Louis Park City Council that the applicant listed
below meets the criteria necessary to receive a premises permit, and the application is hereby
approved
MINNESOTA YOUTH ATHLETIC SERVICES AT GIPPER’S SPORTS BAR AT
4608 EXCELSIOR BLVD., ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
43
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8c
Meeting of September 8, 1998
8c. Resolution for Gambling Premises Permit for Classic Bar & Cafe at 4700
Excelsior Boulevard
Minnesota Youth Athletic Services Gambling Premises license at 4700 Excelsior
Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the Premises Permit.
Background:
The Minnesota Youth Athletic Services has submitted an application for a Gambling Premises
Permit at 4700 Excelsior Blvd. in St. Louis Park. The application is for a Class A license which
includes pulltabs.
All requirements for issuance of the license including notification of properties within 350 feet of
the establishment have been met.
The City Council must approve the license before it is submitted to the State Gambling Control
Board. A copy of the resolution passed by the Council will be submitted to the State.
Police Investigation:
The Police Department has reviewed the application. The principles have been investigated and
approved.
Attachments: Resolution
Application
Prepared by: Cindy Kaiser, Licensing/CSR, 924-2504
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
44
RESOLUTION NO.______________
A RESOLUTION OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING ISSUANCE OF A PREMISES PERMIT FOR LAWFUL
GAMBLING FOR THE MINNESOTA YOUTH ATHLETIC SERVICES
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 349 and St. Louis Park Ordinance Section 13-
1600 , provide for lawful gambling licensing by the State Gambling Control Board; and
WHEREAS, a licensed organization may not conduct lawful gambling at any site unless
it has first obtained from the Board a premise permit for the site; and
WHEREAS, the Board may not issue or renew a premises permit unless the
organization submits a resolution from the City Council approving the premises permit;
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City of St. Louis Park City Council that the applicant listed
below meets the criteria necessary to receive a premises permit, and the application is hereby
approved
MINNESOTA YOUTH ATHLETIC SERVICES AT CLASSIC BAR & CAFE AT
4700 EXCELSIOR BLVD., ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
45
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8d
Meeting of September 8, 1998
8d. Possession of Knives or Edged Weapons in School Zones Ordinance
An ordinance amending Chapter 12 of the St. Louis Park City Code concerning the
possession of dangerous edged weapons on school property.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to waive second reading, adopt ordinance, approve
summary and authorize publication.
Background:
Under current state law, it is a felony level offense to possess a dangerous weapon on school
grounds. The Hennepin County Attorneys Office has made a policy decision to only prosecute
knife cases involving a blade length of four inches or more. During the past two years, fourteen
cases have been declined by the Hennepin County Attorneys Office because they involved knives
with blade lengths of less than four inches.
This ordinance will provide the police department, the city prosecutor, The Hennepin County
Attorney’s Office, and school officials with the additional tool of misdemeanor prosecution
where appropriate. While each case will continue to be evaluated on its own merits, this
ordinance will capture cases similar to the fourteen cases which have been lost during the past
two years.
At a previous study session, Councilmembers requested an alternative ordinance which included
an exemption for adults and community education attendees; however, on August 17, 1998, the
Council removed this exemption clause and waived the first reading of the ordinance without the
clause.
Attachments:
• Possession of Knives or Weapons in School Zone Ordinance
• Ordinance Summary
• St. Louis Park City Ordinance 12-1202 Dangerous Weapons
• Minnesota State Statute 609.66 Dangerous Weapons
Prepared by: John Luse, Chief of Police
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
46
ORDINANCE NO. _________
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE
ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE CONCERNING
THE POSSESSION OF DANGEROUS WEAPONS ON SCHOOL PROPERTY
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Section 12 of the St. Louis Park City Code is amended to include a new
Section 12-1202.100 as follows:
Section 12-1202.100. Possession of Knives or Weapons in School Zones.
A. Definitions. The following words and terms, wherever they occur in this
Ordinance, shall be interpreted as herein defined:
"Edged weapon" shall mean:
1. Any knife, regardless of size or the intended use;
2. Broken glass; or
3. Sharp plastics or sharp metal objects, including tools, capable of injuring a
person.
"School zone" shall mean:
1. Any property owned, leased, or controlled by a school district or an
organization operating a nonpublic school, as defined in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 123.932, subd. 3, where an elementary, middle,
secondary school, secondary vocational center or other school providing
educational services in grade one through grade 12 is located, or used for
educational purposes, or where extracurricular or cocurricular activities are
regularly provided; and
2. The area within a school bus when the bus is being used to transport one
or more elementary or secondary school students.
47
B. Possession of Knives or Weapons in School Zones Prohibited.
1. General Prohibition. It shall be unlawful for any person to be in
possession of, manufacture, carry, transport or control any edged weapon
in any school zone.
C. Exceptions. Edged weapons shall be permitted when used in or as a part of any
law enforcement or instructional activity carried on in a school zone, used in the
preparation or consumption of food in any lunchroom, cafeteria, snack bar, or
other place where food is customarily prepared or served, or when used as a tool
by a person authorized to perform construction, repair or maintenance services in
a school zone.
SECTION 2. Penalty. A violation of this ordinance is a misdemeanor, punishable by 90
days in jail and/or a $700.00 fine.
SECTION 3. This ordinance shall be effective fifteen (15) days after its passage and
publication.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council Sept. 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Manager City Attorney
48
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO. __________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 12 OF THE
ST. LOUIS PARK CITY CODE CONCERNING
THE POSSESSION OF DANGEROUS WEAPONS ON SCHOOL PROPERTY
Summary: This ordinance amends Chapter 12 of the St. Louis Park City Code by making it a
misdemeanor for any person to be in possession of, manufacture, carry, transport or control an
edged weapon in a school zone, except when used as part of a law enforcement or instructional
activity, for meal preparation/consumption, or for construction, repair or maintenance services.
Effective Date: This ordinance shall take effect on October 1, 1998.
Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
/s/ Gail Dorfman
Mayor
(The full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.)
(Published in the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor on September 16, 1998)
49
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8e
Meeting of September 8, 1998
8e. Second reading of an ordinance to amend City Charter Chapter 11.03
(Vacation of Streets) and certain Appendices
St. Louis Park Charter Commission has recommended Charter amendments to
Chapter 11 and certain Appendices for City Council enactment by ordinance.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve second reading of the ordinance to amend
Charter Section 11.03 and Appendices, adopt ordinance (7
affirmative Councilmember votes required), and authorize its
publication.
Background:
As part of the Charter Commission’s comprehensive review of the City Charter provisions, the
Charter Commission unanimously voted on March 11, 1998 to recommend to Council an
amendment to Section 11.03 Vacation of Streets as well as amendments to move a Certificate in
Chapter 11 to an appendix and to redesignate Chapters 13 and 14. The rationale for the
amendments were unanimously approved on May 26, 1998.
These amendments are being referred to the Council for ordinance adoption. An affirmative vote
of all Councilmembers is necessary to adopt an ordinance amending the Charter.
Minnesota statute provides for four methods to amend the Charter which are summarized below.
The Charter Commission is submitting these recommended amendments in conformance with
the 4th method.
1. Upon submission of a petition, the Charter Commission submits amendments to voters.
2. Charter Commission directly submits amendment to referendum at regular or special
election.
3. City Council proposes amendment, subject to Charter Commission review, and submits
to referendum.
4. Charter Commission recommends amendment to the City Council for unanimous
enactment by ordinance. After notice, public hearing , no petition calling for a
referendum, and necessary waiting period, the ordinance/amendment takes effect.
A Study Session Report on this proposed amendment was submitted for Council review on June
8, 1998. Council conducted a public hearing and first reading of the proposed ordinance to
amend the City Charter on July 20, 1998. Two week’s public notice of the hearing and the text of
the proposed amendments were published in the official newspaper. The ordinance would take
effect 90 days after unanimous adoption by Council and publication.
50
Proposed Amendments
The proposed amendment to Section 11.03 inserts in the last sentence the words “or the Registrar
of Titles” and “as appropriate.”
The proposed Charter Section would read (additions bolded and italicized):
Section 11.03. Vacation of Streets. The Council shall have the exclusive power, by
ordinance passed by a vote of at least five (5) members of the Council, to vacate or
discontinue highways, streets and alleys within the City. Such vacations may be only after
notice to affected property owners after hearing, upon such further terms, and by such
procedure as the Council may, by ordinance, prescribe. A record of each such vacation
shall be filed in the office of the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles of Hennepin
County, as appropriate.
The Charter Commission’s rationale for the amendment is to correctly reflect the County offices
where vacations are filed. Abstract titles must be filed with the County Recorder and torrens or
registered properties must be filed with the Registrar of Titles.
In addition, the Charter Commission recommended: 1) moving Page 32 (Certificate of
Commission adopted in 1954) in Chapter 11 to become a new Appendix A entitled “Content of
Original Certificate of Commission”; 2) moving the Amendments (P. 58) to become Appendix
B; and
3) revising the Table of Contents accordingly (i.e.; delete Chapter 14 Amendments, add Appendix
A Content of Certificate of Commission and Appendix B List of Amendments, and drop the Index
designation as Chapter 13 Index). The rationale is to place the historical certificate in the back of
the Charter as an appendix rather than being part of the Charter provisions and to clarify the
Table of Contents to show the 12 substantive Chapters and related appendices.
The City Attorney has reviewed the proposed amendments and does not have any legal concerns.
Next Steps
It is recommended that the Council unanimously approve the attached ordinance which
reflects the Charter Commission’s recommended changes to the City Charter. The
amendment becomes effective 90 days after passage and publication.
Attachments: Proposed Ordinance
Example of Revised Table of Contents - Locations / Appendices
Prepared by: Cindy Larsen, City Clerk
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
51
ORDINANCE NO. _____
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK HOME RULE CHARTER
CHAPTER 11 AND APPENDICES
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. The St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Chapter 11 - Miscellaneous Provisions
Section 11.03 is hereby amended to read:
Section 11.0. Vacation of Streets. The Council shall have the exclusive power, by
ordinance passed by a vote of at least five (5) members of the Council, to vacate or
discontinue highways, streets and alleys within the City. Such vacations may be made
only after notice to affected property owners after hearing, upon such further terms, and
by such procedure as the Council may, by ordinance, prescribe. A record of each such
vacation shall be filed in the office of the County Recorder or the Registrar of Titles of
Hennepin County, as appropriate.
SECTION 2. The St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Chapter 11 - Miscellaneous Provisions is
hereby amended by moving the Certificate of Commission from Chapter 11 (P. 32) to a new
appendix entitled Appendix A: Content of Certificate of Commission.
SECTION 3. The St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Chapter 13 - Index is hereby amended to
remove the designation of the Index as a Chapter.
SECTION 4. The St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Chapter 14 - Amendments is hereby
amended to remove the designation of the Amendments as a Chapter and to add a new appendix
entitled Appendix B: List of Amendments.
SECTION 5. Effective Date.
This ordinance shall be in force and take effect in the City Charter ninety (90) days after its
passage and publication.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Manager City Attorney
52
Example of Revised Locations - Appendices
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HOME RULE CHARTER
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Page
1. Name, Boundaries, Powers and Construction.............................................................. 1-3
2. Government and Officers.............................................................................................4-6
3. Procedure of Council...................................................................................................7-9
4. Nomination and Election..........................................................................................10-13
5. Administration of City Affairs..................................................................................14-16
6. Taxation and Finance...............................................................................................17-23
7. Public Improvements and Special Assessments.............................................................24
8. Eminent Domain..........................................................................................................25
9. Franchises and Public Utilities.................................................................................26-28
10. Public Ownership and Operation of Utilities.................................................................29
11. Miscellaneous Provisions........................................................................................30-31
12. Code of Ethics.......................................................................................................32-39
INDEX..................................................................................................................40-56
Appendix A: Content of Certificate of Commission....................................................57
Appendix B: List of Amendments..............................................................................58
Adopted December 7, 1954
Effective January 7, 1955
Amended/Reprinted _______, 1998
53
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8f
Meeting of September 8, 1998
8f. Resolution Approving the Preliminary Property Tax Levy and Budget for the
1998 Fiscal Year and Establishing the Dates and Times for the Public Hearing
Resolution approving the preliminary property tax levy and budget is required by
Truth in Taxation legislation. Information contained in the resolution will be used
in the individual tax notices prepared by the County in advance of the hearing dates.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the resolution which establishes the
preliminary tax levy and budget for 1999 and sets the hearing
dates and times.
Background:
The Mayor and City Council received the 1999 Proposed Budget document in August and a brief
overview was provided at the Council Study Session on August 24th.
By law, the City Council must approve a preliminary tax levy and budget for 1999 as well as
establish the hearing dates for the public hearing on the budget and tax levy. This information
will appear on the parcel specific tax notices mailed to property owners in November. Council
approval of the preliminary levy and budget must occur on or before September 15th of each
year. Final action of the 1999 levy and budget will not occur until the second Council meeting in
December.
The final levy approved by the Council in December may not exceed the preliminary levy -
which is specified in the resolution in this action.
Analysis:
Hearing Dates
The 1998 State Legislature changed the rules and now cities may hold their hearing as part of a
regular Council meeting. The hearing date for the 1999 budget and tax levy will be held as part
of the Council’s first regular meeting in December - on the 7th. It is recommended that the
meeting time remain at 7:30 p.m. The following Monday, December 14th will be set aside as a
continuation date if one is necessary.
54
Proposed Tax Levy
As detailed in the 1999 Proposed Budget document, a total levy of $12,373,887 is proposed for
next year. This represents an increase of 3.4% over the 1998 levy and provides for an additional
$406,678 to help support the operations of the General Fund, Parks and Recreation operations
and parks improvements. A portion of the levy is also dedicated to the retirement of G.O.
bonded debt. The proposed levy amount is at the Legislature-imposed levy limit.
The amount specified in the resolution is net of the Homestead and Agricultural Credit Aid
(HACA). For the last several years, the State has required the levy be approved “net of HACA.”
A comparison of the amount for 1999 compared to the current year is shown below:
1998/99 Proposed
vs. 1997/98
Levy 97/98 98/99 $%
General Fund 9,212,801$ 9,647,830$ 435,029$ 4.72%
Parks & Recreation 2,309,797 2,397,175 87,378 3.78%
Parks Improvement 64,467 66,906 2,439 3.78%
G.O. Debt 380,144 261,976 (118,168) -31.09%
Gross Levy 11,967,209$ 12,373,887$ 406,678$ 3.40%
1998/99 Proposed
vs. 1997/98
97/98 98/99 $%
Gross Levy 11,967,209$ 12,373,887$ 406,678$ 3.40%
Less:
HACA (2,854,159) (2,852,708) (1,451) -0.05%
Levy as Reported to
the County 9,113,050$ 9,521,179$ 405,227$ 4.45%
Please note that the percentage increase in the levy - as reported to the County, net of HACA - is
no longer 3.4%, but rather 4.45%. This is due to a slight decrease in HACA state-aid.
Attachments:
• Resolution
Prepared By: Kathleen McBride, Director of Finance
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
55
RESOLUTION NO. ______________
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED 1998 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 1999
AND APPROVING PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 1999
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by Charter and State law to approve a
resolution setting forth an annual tax levy to the Hennepin County Auditor; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes currently in force require approval of a proposed property tax
levy and a preliminary budget as well as dates for the initial and continuation public hearings on
the proposed levy and budget on or before September 15th of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the proposed budget document;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park
that the preliminary budget for 1999 shall be as follows:
AVAILABLE RESOURCES
Revenues:
General Property Taxes 9,524,679
Business License Permits 335,055
Non-Business License Permits 952,278
Intergovernmental 6,736,538
Charges for Services 1,811,114
Fines, Forfeits, and Penalties 387,300
Enterprise 8,117,901
Special Assessments 169,345
Miscellaneous Revenue 1,898,490
Refunds and Reimbursements 5,739,512
Transfers In 639,486
Total Revenues 36,311,698
Less: Interfund Charges & Transfers 5,046,513
Net Revenue 31,265,185
Fund Balance / Reserves-Jan 1 36,428,549
Total Available 67,693,734$
56
and as supported by the detailed proposed budget document; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the dates for the public hearing on the proposed tax levy
and budget is set for Monday December 7, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City
Hall, and should a continuation hearing be required, that the date for the continuation hearing
will be Monday, December 14, 1998 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied in 1998, collectible in 1999 upon
the taxable property in said City of St. Louis Park for the following purposes:
General Fund 7,375,485$
Parks & Recreation Fund 1,832,570
Parks Improvement Fund 51,148
G.O. Debt Service 261,976
Total 9,521,179$
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota
REQUIREMENTS
Appropriations:
Personal Services 17,825,606
Supplies, services and other charges 18,021,603
Capital Outlay 2,969,459
Transfers Out 639,486
Total Appropriations 39,456,154
Less: Interfund Charges & Transfers 5,046,513
Net Appropriations 34,409,641
Fund Balance / Reserves-Dec 31 33,284,093
Total Requirements 67,693,734$
57
and to the Local Government Aids/Analysis Division, Department of Revenue, State of
Minnesota as required by law.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
58
Item #9a*
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
AUGUST 5, 1998 --7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Carver, Julie DiGravina, Michael Garelick (arrived at
7:30 p.m.), Ken Gothberg, Dennis Morris, Sally Velick
MEMBERS ABSENT: Michelle Bissonnette
STAFF PRESENT: Judie Erickson, Janice Loftus, Scott Moore, Sacha Peterson
1. Call to Order - Roll Call
Chair Morris called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes of July 15, 1998
Ms. Velick moved approval of the Planning Commission Minutes of July 15, 1998. Mr.
Carver seconded the motion and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0-1 with Carver,
Gothberg, Morris, Velick voting in favor and Julie DiGravina abstaining.
3. Public Hearings
A. Case No. 98-21-CP--Amendment to Comprehensive Plan to add the Park
Commons Concept Plan to the Renewal Chapter and adopt new land use
designations for Park Commons and the City-owned Bass Lake property.
Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator, presented staff report. She described the
town center (Park Commons) concept and phasing plan and explained that in
order to accommodate the type of development which the community supports for
the area, modifications are needed to the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinance. Ms. Erickson concluded with a recommendation that the Planning
Commission recommend that the City Council approve the addition of the Park
Commons Concept Plan to the Renewal Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan and
adopt new land use designations for Park Commons and the City-owned Bass
Lake property.
Chair Morris clarified that the Planning Commission was considering changes to
the Renewal Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan (Chapter 13).
59
Chair Morris opened the Public Hearing.
Jim Rocklin, 4724 Vallacher Avenue, asked for clarification of the commercial
use and housing plan for that area and was concerned about the height of
development.
Ms. Erickson indicated that the commercial area South of Excelsior Boulevard
was not in Phase I and clarified that it was not anticipated to have 4-story
buildings developed in that area.
Mr. Rocklin asked if the health club would remain.
Ms. Erickson stated that this was the case.
Fran Rutherford, 4820 W. 39th Street, Wolfe Lake Apartments, asked for
clarification of the R-75 area of the concept plan.
Ms. Erickson clarified that the area was currently Park Shore Apartments.
Ms. Rutherford stated that she is concerned about the two areas south of the park
designated R-75 and that development of these two area with 4-story buildings
would be too tall and block the view of the park, except through the town green
area.
Ms. Erickson stated that the proposed plan for this area of the concept plan is
townhouses, apartment buildings or commercial development with apartments
above and only 3-4 story buildings were anticipated
Chair Morris reiterated that the concern is that the whole concept from Excelsior
Boulevard to the park would become a barrier if development of 4-6 story
buildings occurred.
Ms. Erickson stated that when MX zoning regulations were examined height
regulations would be included.
Brent Frank, 4530 W. 38th Street, stated he is concerned about the plan for a road
to the west of condominium that connects to Monterey.
Ms. Erickson indicated that the plan changed and there would not be a road
developed.
Michael Garelick arrived at 7:30 p.m.
With no one else wishing to speak, Chair Morris closed the public hearing and
noted that the Planning Commission would vote on both hearings together.
60
B. Case No. 98-22-CP--Amendment to Comprehensive Plan to modify land use
designations and add Livable Communities design and requirements.
Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator, presented the staff report and indicated
that it is proposed to add Commercial MX (mixed use) and change the land use
designation “community facilities” to “civic”. She indicated that the Urban
Design Chapter had been modified and renamed Livable Communities and
changes were made to the implementation section explaining how parking,
automobile, transit, and pedestrians are connected in the community.
Chair Morris opened the Public Hearing for the changes to Comprehensive Plan
Chapters 15 and 16.
William Thibault, 450 Ford Road, stated he is concerned about the wording in
Chapter 15 Livable Communities, Page 12, Private Open Space paragraph. He
suggested that the paragraph be reworded and the word “rather” deleted from the
paragraph to reflect that it is an addition to have private open space and not an
elimination of park dedication.
Ms. Erickson stated that Mr. Thibault’s suggestion is a reasonable alteration.
With no one else wishing to speak, Chair Morris closed the public hearing.
Ms. Velick asked if other comments about Comprehensive Plan changes should
be reserved for later review.
Ms. Erickson indicated that the intent of this amendment is to place the Park
Commons Concept area into the existing Comprehensive Plan and further changes
to the Renewal Chapter would be examined in the next two months and
incorporated into the new Comprehensive Plan to be adopted next year.
Chair Morris asked for clarification of what was being recommended for
adoption.
Ms. Erickson clarified that the Planning Commission is being asked to make a
recommendation for amendments to the existing Comprehensive Plan, which
include changes to Chapter 13, pages 8-12; changes to Chapter 16; and a
completely rewritten and renamed Chapter 15. The proposed additions to
Chapters 13 and 16 are underlined and the deletions have a strike-through.
Mr. Carver moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City
Council adopt a resolution that incorporates the changes to Chapters 13 and 16
and a new Chapter 15. Mr. Gothberg seconded the motion and the motion passed
61
on a vote of 5-0-1 with Carver, Garelick, Gothberg, Morris and Velick voting in
favor and DiGravina abstaining.
4. Old Business - None
5. New Business
A. Consent Agenda: None
B. Other New Business:
i. Case No. 98-24-CUP -- Request of Albrecht Family Partners II
(KK-Five Corporation) for conditional use permits to permit the
construction of a 124 unit apartment building and a 3,000 square
foot property management building at 3120 Glenhurst Avenue.
Sacha Peterson, Planning Associate, presented the staff report and concluded that
the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution
approving the conditional use permits for multiple family housing and property
management buildings subject to the 10 conditions as recommended by staff in
the staff report.
Chair Morris asked if the property management building could be used for any
type of live-in facility.
Ms. Peterson indicated that 25 % of the building proposed would be office and the
remaining would be used for storage.
Chair Morris stated that he desires to see bicycle storage facilities available for
tenants and questioned the designation of the trail.
Ms. Peterson explained that the timing of the County proposal for the trail is
coincidental and described the location of the trail on the plan.
Mr. Gothberg asked if the Fire Department had any concerns about access to the
building.
Ms. Peterson indicated that the Fire Department had reviewed the plans and had
no changes and indicated that sprinklers are to be installed throughout the
building.
Ms. Velick raised the issue of only one access to the site and asked if there were
any other options considered.
Ms. Peterson indicated that the steep grade and ponding requirements were factors
limiting only one access.
62
The Planning Commission discussed traffic patterns. Ms. Peterson indicated that
the plan had been reviewed by the Engineering Department and no problems were
foreseen.
Chair Morris raised the issue of the lack of usable green space and suggested
examining standards in calculating open space requirements. Mr. Gothberg said
he is concerned about residents access to the green space.
Ms. Peterson explained that 25% of the surface parking is proven parking. This
area will be green space and not developed as parking until it is proven that the
parking is necessary.
John Bell and Paul Klodt of KK Five Corporation were present. Mr. Bell
presented a brief overview of the background of the project. He addressed the
issues raised by the Planning Commission and indicated the following:
• The development was an upscale rental project
• Planning the site was challenging
• He is willing to work out what is necessary with the siding issue
• Watershed District approval is in progress
• He has yet to meet with sewer people
• The trail designation on site is favorable, but Condition 2 under staff
recommendations should be modified
• The management building would be used for small office and garage storage
• The only access is off Inglewood
• He has met with the Fire Marshall
• Bicycle storage will be provided in the underground parking area
Mr. Garelick indicated that the City is short on upscale rental property and asked
Mr. Klodt to explain the profile of the anticipated renter.
Mr. Klodt summarized the renter profile and explained that one and a limited
number of two bedroom apartments would be available for approximately $1.00
per square foot. He stated that all units would be handicapped accessible with
wider bathrooms and kitchens.
Chair Morris stated he believes that Condition 2 of staff recommendations should
remain as stated in staff report.
The Planning Commission discussed the ponding issue and Condition 10 of the
staff recommendation. Staff indicated that the plan would be reviewed prior to
City Council consideration
Mr. Garelick moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City
Council adopt a resolution approving conditional use permits for multiple family
housing and property management buildings subject to conditions as
63
recommended by staff. Mr. Gothberg seconded the motion and the motion passed
on a vote of 6-0 with Carver, DiGravina, Garelick, Gothberg, Morris and Velick
voting in favor.
ii. Case No. 98-26-CUP - - Request of Philip Weber (Park Tavern)
for a major amendment to a continue special permit to allow a 1,400
sq. ft. game room addition at 3401 Louisiana Avenue.
Scott Moore, Zoning Administrator presented the staff report and recommended
that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a
resolution approving an amendment to the Contined Special Permit for Park
Tavern to allow for an expansion to the existing building for the purpose of
private indoor entertainment subject to the conditions included in the staff report.
Chair Morris raised a concern about the shared parking provision and asked about
the required distance from building.
Mr. Moore stated that Zoning Ordinance requires that parking be within 500 feet
of the building.
Chair Morris asked how customers would be notified of alternative parking.
Mr. Moore indicated that it was the responsibility of the owner to inform patrons
of additional parking.
Mr. Weber of Park Tavern explained that parking is not an issue. The intent of the
game room is to attract the current bowling clientelle to use the game room after
bowling and not attract new people to the facility. He said they market their
facility in St. Louis Park and are working with the schools to develop leagues for
kids and organize leagues on Saturday morning.
Chair Morris encouraged applicant to post notice for customers indicating
additional parking was available off site.
Mr. Garelick moved that the Planning Commission recommend that the City
Council adopt a resolution approving the amendment subject to the conditions
included in the staff report. Ms. Velick seconded the motion and the motion
passed on a vote of 6-0 with Carver, DiGravina, Garelick, Gothberg, Morris and
Velick voting in favor.
6. Communications
A. Recent City Council Action - July 20, 1998 & August 3, 1998
B. BOZA Minutes of May 28, 1998
C. BOZA Agenda for July 23, 1998
64
D. Other
7. Miscellaneous - None
8. Adjournment
Chair Morris adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Loftus
Administrative Secretary
Prepared by:
Shirley Olson
Recording Secretary
65
Item 9b*
August 21, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
AILES, KEN MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 98.48
AIRLIFT DOORS INC BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 299.26
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 416.77
ALLIANCE MECHANICAL SERVICES I BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 116.00
ALMSTEAD'S SUPERVALU MEETING EXPENSE 174.00
ALMSTED'S NEW MARKET CONCESSION SUPPLIES 85.77
AMERIPRIDE LINEN AND APPAREL S CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 172.39
ANCHOR INDUSTRIES INC. BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 280.34
ANDERSEN INC, EARL F GENERAL SUPPLIES 297.14
APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 466.15
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 19,745.66
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 61.66
AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 108.32
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 170.75
AV GROUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 176.67
BACHMANS BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 107.57
BAKER, JACK G INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
BARNES, ROBERT GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.99
BARTLEY SALES CO INC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 55.38
BERKLEY ADMINISTRATORS WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3,615.00
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,641.43
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 448.34
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS (354.59)
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BROCK WHITE CO LLC BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 111.97
CAMPBELL KNUTSON SCOTT & FUCHS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,273.31
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 3,195.00
CATCO PARTS SERVICE EQUIPMENT PARTS 30.50
CHENEY SIGNS GENERAL SUPPLIES 312.04
COLLISYS ELECTRIC CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 158.40
COMPUSA INC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 53.68
CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 255.00
CSC CREDIT SERVICES INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.00
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 134.87
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 380.41
CURTIS 1000 INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.25
DALCO MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 3,942.04
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.38
DAYTON'S/TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.76
DCA INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 303.97
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES 117.98
DIAMOND VOGEL PAINT CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,104.01
DREWITZ, ANTHONY PROGRAMMING 37.50
ELLANSON, LUKE R STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 1,674.26
66
FLARE HEATING HEATING 40.55
FUN SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,006.09
G & K SERVICES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 37.12
GARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 168.50
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS (30.44)
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 601.26
GEORGETOWN PUBLISHING HOUSE SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 97.00
GIFT OF MUSIC GENERAL SUPPLIES 750.00
GRAINGER INC, W W GENERAL SUPPLIES 114.91
GREENMAN TECHNOLOGIES OF MN IN CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 32.64
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 2,496.01
HENN CO INFORMATION SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICES 128.15
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 732.35
HEWLETT-PACKARD CO OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 959.03
HOME HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.37
HPI INTERNATIONAL INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 269.85
HUGHES, CARRIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 118.44
HUMPHREY, CAROLE GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.80
I.S.D.#283/AQUATICS-COMMUNITY GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.00
INDELCO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 24.60
INGRAHAM & VOSS INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 625.70
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (166.20)
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL EQUIPMENT PARTS 11.33
INTL CONF BLDG OFFIC SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 795.90
IWLA/SOS GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.50
JEWISH COMMUNITY CTR OF GREATE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100,700.00
KAMPA, STEPHANIE PROGRAMMING 37.50
KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN CAPITALIZED INTEREST 642.43
KIEFER & ASSOCIATES, ADOLPH GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.68
KILBY, PAT GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.92
KNOX, BETSY GENERAL SUPPLIES 295.32
KONICA BUSINESS MACHINES RENTAL EQUIPMENT 39.41
LANDGREN, ROGER INSURANCE BENEFITS 163.77
LANGFUS, BRAD ADULT ATHLETICS 110.00
LATZ, RONALD S TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 308.83
LEAF, JONATHAN ADULT ATHLETICS 110.00
LEES SHOE REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.00
LOFTUS ORNAMENTAL IRON GENERAL SUPPLIES 33.00
LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 27,162.15
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 70.10
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 132.19
MAKI, DENNIS GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.00
MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 677.26
MC HUGH, JOHN T EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 295.28
MC LAUGHLIN, JOANNA L SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 200.00
MEDICINE LAKE LINES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 167.05
METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 273,157.66
METRO SALES INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 159.29
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE 6,930.00
67
MINN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 3,143.68
MINNESOTA NCSY GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,000.00
MINNETONKA IRON WORKS EQUIPMENT PARTS 50.00
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY LICENSES/TAXES 20.00
MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,140.16
MOY, MICHAEL INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
MPLS DEPT OF HEALTH/FAMILY SUP OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 38.00
MSANI TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 10.00
MURPHY, KATHY MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 130.65
MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 122.86
NATL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN GENERAL SUPPLIES 600.00
NEENAH FOUNDREY EQUIPMENT PARTS 2,811.60
NELSON, VICKI SEASON TICKET-RESIDENT 30.00
NETCOM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 150.00
NORTHERN WATER TREATING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 107.79
NOVARTIS NUTRITION CORP. GENERAL CUSTOMERS 9,594.32
NSP CO ELECTRIC SERVICE 14,329.22
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 64.86
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 3,026.09
ORKIN PEST CONTROL GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.46
P & H WAREHOUSE SALES INC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 29.73
PALM BROTHERS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 69.70
PANNING, CRAIG CONCESSION SUPPLIES 83.20
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 39.30
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 614.25
PARTS PLUS-NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIV EQUIPMENT PARTS (192.57)
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY CONCESSION SUPPLIES 1,150.72
PHYSIO-CONTROL CORPORATION EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 137.26
PRINT GRAPHICS PRINTING & PUBLISHING 425.00
PRINTERS SERVICE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 62.00
PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.98
QEC-MN POSTAGE 786.99
QUANTUM LABS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.41
QUIST ART & DESIGN, GLENN PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 108.00
R & R SPECIALTIES TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 30.00
RADIO SHACK RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 63.88
RAINBOW FOODS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 122.50
RILEY, DETTMANN, & KELSEY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 410.55
SEDGWICK JAMES OF MINN INC PROF/CONSULT SERVICES 1,485.00
SEVYLOR U S A INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 399.87
SIGN EFFECTS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.00
SLP ATHLETIC DEPT GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,200.00
SLP GIRLS BASKETBALL ASSN GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,430.00
SLP SENIOR PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,405.37
SMART TEMPTATIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 124.80
SNAP-ON TOOLS SMALL TOOLS 431.06
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,884.44
ST LOUIS PARK COMMUNITY BAND GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00
ST LOUIS PARK FASTPITCH ASSO GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00
68
ST LOUIS PARK HS FOOTBALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,000.00
ST LOUIS PARK TRUE VALUE GENERAL SUPPLIES 46.79
ST PAUL PIONEER PRESS OTHER ADVERTISING 363.20
STAR TRIBUNE OTHER ADVERTISING 1,127.50
STEEL PRODUCTS & ALUMINUM INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,065.00
SUBURBAN TIRE CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 162.33
SYSTEMS SUPPLY INC COMPUTER SUPPLIES 236.13
TAYLOR, BERNIE ADULT ATHLETICS 110.00
TEENS ALONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,000.00
TENCZAR, CHRISTINE PROGRAMMING 37.50
THYMES TWO CATERING GENERAL SUPPLIES 234.30
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.96
U S BANK FISCAL AGENT FEES 2,600.00
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 3,811.13
UNITOG RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 147.66
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 222.29
WARNING LITES OF MN INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 650.72
WATSON CO INC CONCESSION SUPPLIES 4,675.15
WILSON, ROLAND GENERAL SUPPLIES 75.00
WISEMAN, SUE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 61.51
YMCA CAMP IHDUHAPI GENERAL SUPPLIES 384.00
ZEP MANUFACTURING GENERAL SUPPLIES (95.85)
ZIP SORT POSTAGE 39.23
ZIPSORT POSTAGE 6,215.80
549,667.93
August 31, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
ACME TYPEWRITER INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.88
AMERICAN LEGION POST 282 MISCELLANEOUS 30.00
ANCHOR PAPER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 662.36
ANDERSEN INC, EARL F OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 959.41
APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 334.20
ARMSTRONG, STELLA A INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
ASPLUNDH TREE EXPERT CO CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 4,102.39
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 8.57
AVR INC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 221.84
BACHMAN'S OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 33.74
BESNER, GAYLE PROGRAMMING 37.50
BIFFS INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,382.39
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 459.31
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 23.99
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS (354.59)
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,189.12
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 105.60
69
CARROLL, WADE GENERAL SUPPLIES 70.00
CATCO PARTS SERVICE EQUIPMENT PARTS 78.16
CERES ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES I CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 27,653.75
CLOSE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,750.00
COLEMAN, SUE R INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
COLLINS, PATRICK TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 91.70
COLLISYS ELECTRIC CO BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 236.00
COMO PARK CONSERVATORY GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.50
CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 44.73
CUSTOM HEADSETS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,051.25
CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 3,828.68
DALCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 655.28
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 1,007.30
DEKO FACTORY SERVICE INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 54.38
DELEGARD TOOL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES (371.31)
DEVOE & RAYNOLDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 512.24
DIESEL COMPONENTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 472.82
ELGIN SWEEPER COMPANY TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 350.00
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.46
ENSR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,017.29
ERICSON, JOHN INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 485.66
FANTASIA CHARTERS INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 470.30
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 377.35
FIRST SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 389.05
FLEXIBLE PIPE TOOL EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,094.02
FREELANCING UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 388.73
FREEWAY RADIATOR SERVICE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 489.90
GARDNER HARDWARE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,347.43
GARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,310.63
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS (30.44)
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,073.54
GILBERT, KEN YOUTH RECREATION 22.00
GILBERT, SCOTT SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 339.38
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 540.75
GRAFIX SHOPPE GENERAL SUPPLIES 185.29
GRAINGER INC, W W SMALL TOOLS 271.11
GRAY, ANDY SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 71.50
GREENE, JORDAN SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 71.25
HACH COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.39
HARDISON, JON E INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 1,143.07
HENNEPIN PARKS GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00
HENNEPIN TECHNICAL COLLEGE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 810.00
HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 638.21
HOLTZ, CATHERINE A INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
HOME DEPOT/GECF LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 650.72
HOME HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 312.71
HORNIBROOK, JAMES INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
70
HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 22,759.45
HUIRAS, SHIRLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 246.65
HUTTON, JON ADULT ATHLETICS 230.00
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 80.58
INDUSTRIAL SAW EQUIPMENT PARTS 67.85
INGRAHAM & VOSS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 339.10
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (166.20)
IOS CAPITAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 710.36
IVERSON, LISA MISCELLANEOUS 20.00
JUSTUS LUMBER CO OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 336.48
KNOX LUMBER COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 515.22
LANGEFELS, DOUGLAS MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 66.63
LARSON ELECTRIC CO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 29.77
LEVINE, BLOSSOM INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
LINHOFF PHOTO & DIGITAL IMAGIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.94
LOHMAN'S AMHURST HOMEOWNER'S A MEETING EXPENSE 5,000.00
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 81.23
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 96.22
LOWELLS AUTOMOTIVE EQUIPMENT PARTS 647.40
LUDINGTON, DEB INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
M/A ASSOCIATES INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 284.16
MACQUEEN EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 104.28
MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 630.00
MAY, JANETTE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 28.69
MC LENDON, JAMES INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
MENARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.58
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 333.24
MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 88.57
MINN RECREATION & PARK ASSN TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 306.00
MINNESOTA SECTION AWWA TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 140.00
MINNESOTA WANNER EQUIPMENT PARTS 9.59
MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 9.95
MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,105.70
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 150.78
MURPHY, JOHN INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
N Y S C A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00
NATIONAL CAMERA EXCHANGE OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 815.00
NORTHWEST FILTER SUPPLY INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 42.90
NRG DISTRIBUTORS GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.85
NSP CO ELECTRIC SERVICE 16.99
OLIVEIRA, AL GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 94.41
PALACIO, A INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
PAPA JOHNS PIZZA GENERAL SUPPLIES 62.73
PARK LIGHTING INC. OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,030.00
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 622.13
PARTS PLUS-NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIV EQUIPMENT PARTS 107.58
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY CONCESSION SUPPLIES 405.56
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 348.53
71
POMMER MFG CO INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.54
PRESTIGE LINCOLN MERCURY EQUIPMENT PARTS 257.12
PROBST, JOE GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.00
PROF TURF & RENOVATION LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 266.25
QEC-MN GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.90
RADIO SHACK EQUIPMENT PARTS 19.51
RAINBOW FOODS SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 102.63
RELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLIES 93.31
REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.90
SAFETY-KLEEN CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 183.54
SAM'S CLUB CONCESSION SUPPLIES 358.20
SCHWAAB INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.09
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 591.23
SLP SCHOOL DISTRICT 283/COMMUNITY
EDUCATION
OFFICE SUPPLIES 573.93
SPS COMPANIES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 49.34
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,598.49
STANDARD SPRING OF MPLS EQUIPMENT PARTS 572.28
STAT MEDICAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 59.94
STATE FIRE MARSHAL DIVISION TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 70.00
STREICHER'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,517.63
SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS 175.37
SUBURBAN TIRE CO TIRES 53.00
SYSTEMS SUPPLY INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 337.09
TALL TIMBER TREE EXPERTS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,600.00
TEKLOGIX COMPUTER SUPPLIES 825.00
TIERNEY BROTHERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 365.93
TKDA ENGINEERING SERVICES 2,314.60
TOWMASTER INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 186.38
TRACY/TRIPP FUELS MOTOR FUELS 6,888.07
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 140.81
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 650.42
ULRICH, TROY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,647.85
UNITOG RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 486.14
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 312.36
VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,940.45
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 363.51
WALDOR PUMP COMPANY EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 407.35
WHEELER LUMBER OPERATIONS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,958.86
WHITE, PERRY GENERAL SUPPLIES 29.99
WILLIAMS, DELORES OTHER REVENUE 35.00
WSB ASSOCIATES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,678.96
ZEP MANUFACTURING GENERAL SUPPLIES (95.85)
ZIP SORT POSTAGE 58.91
180,823.75
September 4, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
72
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 526.35
ALBINSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.03
ANCHOR PAPER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 588.10
ANDERSEN INC, EARL F GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.49
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.14
AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 58.61
BACHMANS BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 952.45
BECKER, TODD INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 50.00
BEIGHTOL, GENE YOUTH ATHLETICS 95.00
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 566.65
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE OFFICE SUPPLIES 161.44
BOT, SUZANNE M MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 164.13
BOWYER, CARLA A INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS (354.59)
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BROCK WHITE CO LLC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 623.23
CALVARY TEMPLE MISCELLANEOUS 30.00
CAMILON, MANNY MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 250.87
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT PARTS 40.14
CHEROKEE POWER EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 2.41
COLLISYS ELECTRIC CO EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 147.50
CONSTRUCTION MARKET DATA LEGAL NOTICES 729.35
CRILEY, KATHI L TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 55.07
CURTIS 1000 INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 866.64
DELEGARD TOOL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES (371.31)
DELOITTE & TOUCHE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,000.00
DOUGHERTY, JANE MISCELLANEOUS 100.00
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 69.86
ESLER, JEFF INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 369.90
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 37.55
FRANKLIN, JOYCE INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
GABRIELSON, LORI GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS (30.44)
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 653.18
GOODWIN, BETTY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
GRANDBOIS, JOHN OTHER REVENUE 25.00
GRAUNKE, BARBARA INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
HEMKER, DIANE SEASON TICKET-RESIDENT 25.00
HENN CO TREASURER POSTAGE 496.32
HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS D CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 7,708.10
HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 849.45
HOME DEPOT/GECF BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 105.78
HOME HARDWARE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 22.56
HRENO, PATRICIA MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 37.96
HYDRANT SPECIALIST OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 500.00
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST 625 DAILY TICKETS 126.00
INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL OF MN DAILY TICKETS 137.50
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (166.20)
73
JOHN HENRY FOSTER MINNESOTA OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 522.41
JUSTUS LUMBER CO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 35.94
KARSTEN, SHIRLEY BUILDING RENTAL 40.00
KNOX LUMBER COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 141.07
KRAAYENBRINK, CHAD GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00
KUHN, COLLEEN OTHER REVENUE 35.00
LARSON, DOROTHY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
LASER QUIPT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 859.76
LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY COMPANY BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 69.50
LEAGUE OF MN HUMAN RIGHTS COMM TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 90.00
LIFE & SAFETY GENERAL SUPPLIES 226.95
LINDBERG, BRAD MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 227.50
M G I A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 15.00
MACQUEEN EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 21.10
MARSHALL & SWIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 102.95
MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 630.00
MC CASHIN, BRENDAN D MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 37.38
MENARDS EQUIPMENT PARTS 19.14
METRO SYSTEMS NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 2,009.14
MINN SUN PUBLICATIONS LEGAL NOTICES 975.48
MINNEAPOLIS WINDOW SHADE CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.00
MN DEPT OF HEALTH OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,622.00
MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 660.32
MORGAN, PAM GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.31
MPLS FINANCE DEPT GENERAL SUPPLIES 519.50
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 180.00
MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 29.39
NATIONAL EMERGENCY NUMBER ASSO TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 195.00
NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 176.33
NPELRA SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 12.00
NRG DISTRIBUTORS GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.98
NSP CO NOTES PAYABLE 66,294.71
OLSON, JILL K MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 28.21
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 236.24
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252.00
PARTS PLUS-NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIV EQUIPMENT PARTS 18.60
PERSONNEL DECISIONS INTERNATIO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,700.00
PLANT & FLANGED EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 149.16
POSTMASTER POSTAGE 5,475.00
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.71
PRECISION PAVEMENT MARKING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,900.00
PRESTIGE LINCOLN MERCURY EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,730.90
PRINTERS SERVICE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 28.30
RAICHE, BECKY CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 125.00
RAINBOW TREE COMPANY INC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 4,124.45
RANDY'S SANITATION INC GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 3,011.53
RUDDLE, MARJEAN SWIMMING POOL/WHIRLPOOL 335.72
SABATHANI COMMUNITY CENTER DAILY TICKETS 147.00
SALONEK, MYRON TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 513.63
74
SCHELEN-GRAY AUTO ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT PARTS 534.09
SEDGWICK JAMES OF MINN INC PROF/CONSULT SERVICES 1,890.00
SHANDELING, JANET ICE RENTAL 106.50
ST ANDREW CHURCH DAILY TICKETS 30.50
STAT MEDICAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 45.55
STREICHER'S EQUIPMENT PARTS (355.77)
SUPERIOR FORD EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 266.60
SWEENEY BROS TRACTOR EQUIPMENT PARTS 27.16
TANICK, ESTHER OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 149.00
TIERNEY BROTHERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 113.87
TWIN CITY OPTICAL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 129.30
TWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 225.00
UNITOG RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 319.19
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 529.08
VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES 169.97
VIP TRAVEL CENTER TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 736.00
WAGGONER, NANCY L INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
WEIGEL, GREGORY TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 91.00
WESTMAN FLORAL INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.28
WHEELER LUMBER OPERATIONS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,065.43
YOUNG, NANCY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
ZEP MANUFACTURING GENERAL SUPPLIES 393.98
ZIP PRINTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 137.28
ZIP SORT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 764.83
138,979.71
September 2, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 93.96
LAWRENCE, MONTE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 38.31
MEDICAL ANESTHESIA LTD WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 519.52
METHODIST HOSPITAL WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 5,463.84
MINNESOTA ORTHOPEDICS WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 352.66
MN CENTER FOR SPORTS MEDICINE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 55.52
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 2,513.56
PAULOUSKI, WADE INJURY PAY 1,760.08
ROSS CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 83.87
SIMTEK CORPORATION WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 3.75
THOMPSON, JIM INJURY PAY 858.98
TWIN CITIES ORTHO PA WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 39.84
11,783.89
September 2, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
GREAT WEST LIFE & ANNUITY INS DENTAL INSURANCE 5,600.08
75
5,600.08
September 2, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 2,866.76
ALLINA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 27,153.90
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 406.00
FELDMAN, HARVEY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,667.00
FORTIS BENEFITS DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,886.01
GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 8,542.00
HEALTHPARTNERS DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 54,192.73
HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT & COLL DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 2,576.64
I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,561.65
ICMA ANNUAL CONFERENCE REGISTR TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 445.00
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-401 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 472.88
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 19,520.62
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,914.00
MINNESOTA BENEFIT ASSOCIATION DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 643.83
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 602.00
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,210.00
PARK NATIONAL BANK DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 205,400.83
PERA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 87,286.15
PERA FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT ASSO DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 6,423.10
PERA LIFE INSURANCE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 105.00
PERA POLICE RETIREMENT ASSOC DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 16,184.63
POSTMASTER POSTAGE 82.50
SLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS-LOCA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 861.00
SLP CREDIT UNION DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 61,863.77
U S BANK BOND INTEREST 15,952.10
UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 157.00
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 3,549.82
USCM / MIDWEST DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 13,592.44
WESTBRIDGE CAPITAL CORP INSURA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 68.12
542,187.48
76
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 11a
Meeting of September 8, 1998
11a. Vision for the Arts Strategic Plan
Council is being requested to authorize a one-time expenditure of $2000 to assist in
funding for the Vision for the Arts Strategic Plan being developed by the Friends of
the Arts.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to authorize an expenditure of $2000 to support the
Vision for the Arts Strategic Plan.
Background:
At its study session meeting of August 24, 1998, Council met with members of Friends of the
Arts to discuss their strategic plan process to develop a Vision Statement for the arts in our
community. A significant number of elements in this process will include activities to better
understand the needs of the community as they relate to the arts and to identify potential long-
term goals and partnerships for Friends of the Arts.
This 10-month project is being funded largely through a grant from the Minnesota State Arts
Board. In addition, the Friends of the Arts are requesting a one-time expenditure from the City in
the amount of $2000 to fill a gap in funding necessary to complete the project.
Recommendation:
Staff believes that the funding for arts is consistent with the overall purpose of recreational and
cultural services provided and supported by the City and requests that Council provide financial
support for the strategic planning process for the arts in St. Louis Park by appropriating $2,000 in
the 1999 budget for the Friends of the Arts and their efforts to develop a Vision for the Arts.
Attachments: Executive Summary - FOA Strategic Plan
Prepared by: Cindy Larsen, City Clerk
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
77
Vision for the Arts - Strategic Plan
Executive summary of process and work plan
July 9, 1998
Goal. Friends of the Arts will launch a strategic planning process in order to develop a “Vision
Statement” to present to the City Council and community, and to develop a strategic plan based
on that vision. The project period will be for 10 months.
The proposed outcomes that will result from this strategic planning process will include, but will
not be limited to, the following:
• A document that outlines a clear collaborative vision for arts for the community of St. Louis
Park.
• An integrated action plan for involvement in the arts and for leadership within the arts for
citizens in St. Louis Park.
• A broader and more diverse list of potential participants in art programs in St. Louis Park.
• To broaden the definition, meaning, and forms of self-expression of art for the city of St.
Louis Park.
A significant number of elements of Friends of the Arts strategic planning process will include
activities to better understand the needs of the community as they relate to the arts and to identify
potential long-term goals and partnerships for Friends of the Arts:
• Community meetings targeted to under-served populations and socio-economically diverse
neighborhoods. These meetings would take place in the Meadowbrook neighborhood and
with Perspectives and Wayside supportive housing centers.
• Town hall meetings for the general community encompassing the 33 neighborhoods involved
in the Neighborhood Revitalization Plan for the city of St. Louis Park.
• Focus groups targeted towards all identified groups of individuals that have a stake in the
outcome of our strategic planning process.
• A survey for community members who have not been involved with scheduled planning
meetings. The distribution of this survey has not been specifically determined but would
most likely be made available at art events, public spaces or by request.
• Research other community’s plans and outcomes as it relates to art programming and
community involvement.
• Friends of the Arts Steering Committee meetings, which represent the groups of individuals
who have a stake in the outcome of our strategic planning process.
Long Term benefits to Friends of the Arts. The planning process will leverage a number of
long-term outcomes that will not only benefit Friends of the Arts, but the entire community.
• Stronger working ties to community groups, neighborhoods and the city government.
• Working plan to help assist in strategic growth of Friends of the Arts’ infrastructure and
program planning.
• Establish partnerships with other groups identified in the integrated action plans.
78
• Art is integrated into the working and living fabric of the community.
• A community where art is accessible and representational of St. Louis Park citizens.
Timeline.
• Finalization of work plan with volunteer assignments August
• Launch of press release September
• Town hall meetings and targeted community meetings with organizations and neighborhoods
to gather input and direction from community leaders and invested community individuals.
Identify and prioritize future opportunities, challenges and issues to be addressed.
October - November
• Information processed and formal strategic planning process is launched. Vision statement
drafted. Align and find the right balance between the organization's vision, its mission and its
capabilities. December - February
• Completion of Strategic Plan. Develop strategies and resources to achieve the vision.
March 1999
• Final draft completed. April 1999
Strategic Planning Process Outline. The following components will be addressed in order
to develop a strategic vision for a comprehensive arts program for St. Louis Park.
• Vision
• Values and shared beliefs
• Mission Statement
• Work plan
• Identification of all stakeholders
• Identification of strengths and weaknesses of current arts program
• Identification of opportunities and threats to a new arts program for the city
• Identification and collection of data of other successful arts programs in other
communities
• Identification of overall art needs or current issues surrounding current art
programs in the city
• Identification of current access and diversity levels and stated goals in these
areas
• Identification of partners, collaborators, and perceived competitors
• Work plan components
• Inputs
• Activities
• Outputs
• Immediate Outcomes
• Intermediate Outcomes
• Long Term Outcomes
(Note: this will replace tradition Goals/Objectives/Strategy/Tactics
Outline)
• Overall time line and other resources needed to complete the plan
• Board member responsibility
79
• Staff/Consultant responsibility
Other work areas that this strategic plan MAY address but will NOT include fully:
• Board Development action steps
• Marketing Communications action steps
• Resource Development plan
• Volunteer recruitment plan
What is the Current Vision for Arts in St. Louis Park as stated by the Board of Directors of
Friends of the Arts?
• Visiting artists coming to a center
• Our own building that is community space that provides many functions
• Gallery space
• Performing space
• Dance floor
• Rehearsal space
• Classroom space
• Drama Workshop space
• Cultural arts space
• Office space
• Storage space
• Un-used space to grow into
What should and can Friends of the Arts offer through ART in our city?
• art experiences
• art programming and space
• arts opportunities
• art events
• creative thought
• self expression
• multi-cultural experiences
• multi-generation experiences
• access
• alternative to sports
Who are our stakeholders?
• Schools
• private
• public
• Businesses
• City
• St. Louis Park
• Neighboring suburbs
80
• City of Minneapolis
• Organizations
• art
• places of worship
• civic
• nonprofit
• neighborhood
• Funders
• Foundations
• Corporations
• Individuals
• Media
Who are we specifically targeting?
• First and foremost, our community - as
an inclusive group
• Artists
• Children
• Adults
• Seniors
• Families
• Low income/High income
• All groups as identified as diversity
groups for St. Louis Park
81
What are the volunteer positions that we need to fill ASAP?
Executive Committee: Susan Schneck
Laurie Bramhall
Rick Person
Kira Budzinski
Project Consultant Curt N. Peterson, CFRE
City Liaison ______________________
School District Liaison ______________________
• Arts Accessibility Planning and Assessment Chair________________________
• Neighborhood Meeting and Planning Coordinators(3)________________________
• Survey Chair_________________________________
• Special Target Groups Chair_________________________________
• Arts Programming Research Chair_______________________________
• Communications Chair_________________________________
• Logisitics Support (Intern?)___________________________________________
_________________________________________________
82
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 11b
Meeting of September 8, 1998
11b. Confirmation of the Appointment of Cynthia S. Walsh to the Position of Parks
and Recreation Director
This action confirms the appointment by the City Manager of Cynthia S. Walsh to
the position of Parks and Recreation Director.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to confirm the appointment of Cynthia S. Walsh to the
position of Parks and Recreation Director effective September
21, 1998.
Background:
The resignation of Cris Gears has created a vacancy in the office of Parks and Recreation
Director. Recruitment and selection activities have taken place over the past several months
with the final result being an offer of employment to Cynthia Walsh, Director of Parks and
Recreation and Community Development Director with the City of Arden Hills, Minnesota.
Ms. Walsh comes to us with eight years of management and operational experience in Parks and
Recreation, including park and trail planning and development, redevelopment, maintenance and
recreation programming; experience in pool management; a history of close work with
Community Education; and experience with municipal planning and zoning.
Staff feels that Ms. Walsh’s combination of experience and qualifications make her an ideal
match for this position and request that Council confirm the appointment effective September 21,
1998.
Attachments: Resume of Cynthia S. Walsh
Prepared by: Cindy Larsen, City Clerk
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
83
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 11c
Meeting of September 8, 1998
11c. Scope of Work - Golden Auto Site-Railroad Connection Issue
Approval of the Scope of Work and Professional Services agreement with Richard
L. Koppy/RLK and Associates for project management services.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve a Scope of Work associated with carrying out
certain roles and tasks outlined in the preliminary agreement
between the City of St. Louis Park/EDA and Hennepin County
and authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute a
professional services agreement with Richard L. Koppy/ RLK
and Associates for project management services.
Background:
On March 16, 1998 the City Council adopted a resolution approving a preliminary agreement
between Hennepin County, the City of St. Louis Park and the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority relating to the Golden property and the evaluation of proposed railroad
routes in the City. The resolution contemplated the City, the EDA and Hennepin County
cooperatively undertaking an investigation of issues involving the impacts of railroads in St.
Louis Park, the feasibility of constructing a rail connection at the Golden Auto site and the
potential reuse of the remainder of the Golden property for redevelopment. The preliminary
agreement laid out specific roles of the City, Economic Development Authority and County with
respect to investigating the various issues. The source of funds identified to undertake the
investigative analysis was the Environmental Response Fund created by the Minnesota State
Legislature in 1997. $300,000 from the Environmental Response Fund has been set aside for
expenses by the City or the EDA for purposes pursuant to the agreement.
During the July 13 study session staff discussed with the Council the concept of retaining outside
assistance to provide project management services. It was recommended that Richard
Koppy/RLK and Associates be considered to fulfill this role as project manager.
On July 27th staff and Richard Koppy reviewed with the City Council a proposed scope of work
relating to the preliminary investigative stage identified in the aforementioned agreement. The
Council requested that staff bring the proposed scope of work back to the City Council for
consideration at their meeting of September 8th.
What is the basic content of the scope of work?
The attached scope of work breaks the work program into the following elements.
84
1. Reconnection with stakeholders.
2. Preparation of a base line information report regarding railroads within St. Louis
Park and how they relate to regional transportation needs.
3. Review of the future railroad transportation in St. Louis Park.
4. Determining the economic and physical redevelopment opportunities and
constraints of the Golden property.
5. Preliminary cost estimation of railroad reconstruction alternatives.
6. Ongoing project management and organization of study tasks.
It should be noted that the above tasks are only a part of many tasks to be undertaken by the City,
EDA and County as outlined in the preliminary agreement.
What changes have been made to the scope of work since last reviewed by the City
Council?
The attached document highlights the proposed changes. Other than adding in dates/timelines,
most of the changes have been minor clarifications.
What is the general timeframe identified in the scope of work?
The scope of work proposes that the work items be completed by approximately February of
1999. At that time, the City Council will receive the results of the various analyses undertaken
and decide as to the next appropriate course of action.
What is the estimated budget relating to the scope of work?
It is estimated that it will cost approximately $85,000 to complete the items identified in the
scope of work, plus any subconsultant expenses such as appraisals and environmental analysis.
Again, the Environmental Response Fund will be the source of funds to pay for this cost. The
County may request the City pay a small percentage of the cost of the study for those items that
are purely administrative. This request would be based on the agreement between the two parties
which states that we would not request reimbursement for administrative staff expenses. If so
requested by the County, the Development Fund could be used to defray these expenses.
Attachments:
Professional Services Agreement (On file in the Clerk’s Office)
Prepared by: Thomas K. Harmening, Community Development Director
David Anderson, Economic Development Coordinator
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
1175:N
85
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 11d*
Meeting of September 8, 1998
*11d. Bid Tabulation: Purchase of Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) Supply
Contract
This report considers the purchase of Granular Activated Carbon (GAC) for Water
Treatment Plant No. 1, (WTP #1) located at 2935 Jersey Avenue South.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to authorize execution of a contract with Calgon Carbon
Corporation for the purchase of GAC in the amount of
$27,628.00.
Background: Granular Activated Carbon Treatment Plants are located at 2935 Jersey Avenue
(Water Treatment Plant No. 1) and at 4701 Natchez Avenue (Water Treatment Plant No. 4).
These plants came on line in 1986 and 1993, respectively. These GAC plants treat drinking
water contaminated by the Reilly Tar and Chemical Plant. This treatment is effective in
removing polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contaminants. The GAC absorbs the PAH’s
as the contaminated water passes through the filters. The GAC eventually becomes loaded with
the PAH particles and is no longer effective in the removal of the PAH’s and must be changed
out. The GAC treated water is continually monitored to measure the amount of PAH’s removed.
When the level of PAH’s in the treated water increases to the Drinking Water Advisory Level the
GAC is scheduled for replacement. The replacement of the GAC has been done annually at
Water Treatment Plant No. 1 since the plant was put into service. GAC replacement at Water
Treatment Plant No. 4 is anticipated to be done once every two or three years. Groundwater
contamination is more severe at Water Treatment Plant No. 1 and there are two (2) filter vessels
at Plant No. 1 while there are four (4) filter vessels at Plant No. 4.
Bids were received on September 1, 1998 for the supply and regeneration of GAC for Water
Treatment Plant No. 1 at 2935 Jersey Avenue South. An advertisement for bids was published in
the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on August 19, 1998. A summary of the bid results is as follows:
Bidder Bid Amount
Calgon Carbon Corporation $ 27,628.00
Norit Americas, Inc. $ 27,926.84
Financial Considerations: The bid of $27,628.00 by Calgon Carbon Corporation represents a
slightly lower cost ($0.58 versus $0.80) per pound for the GAC than the previous contract with
Calgon Carbon Corporation in 1998 which totaled $36,400.00. The 1998 Water Utility Budget
provided $40,000 for this GAC exchange at Water Treatment Plant No. 1.
Prepared By: Scott Anderson, Public Works
Approved by:Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
86
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 11e*
Meeting of September 8, 1998
*11e. City Engineer’s Report: City-wide random curb and gutter and sidewalk
repair work - Project No. 98-07.
This report reviews the City’s random curb and gutter and sidewalk repair program
and recommends authorization to receive bids.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution accepting the City
Engineer’s Report, establishing and ordering improvement
Project No. 98-07, approving plans and specifications, and
authorizing receipt of bids.
Background: Each year the City contracts for random curb and gutter and sidewalk repair work
to keep the City’s curbs and sidewalks in a safe condition. The program is comprised of City-
wide random repairs, many of which are due to tree roots, etc. The proposed work includes the
removal of the existing sidewalk or curb and gutter as needed, subgrade correction, and
placement of new concrete sidewalk or curb and sod.
Financial Considerations: The 1998 Street Department budget allocates $75,000 to the random
concrete repair program. The estimated cost for Project No. 98-07 is $75,000. No special
assessments are proposed for the project. Following is a summary of the estimated costs and
revenue source:
Estimated Costs
Construction Costs $68,000
Contingency (10%) $ 7,000
Total $75,000
Revenue Sources
1998 Street Department Budget $75,000
Feasibility: The project, as proposed herein, is necessary, cost effective and feasible under the
conditions noted and at the costs estimated.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared By: Carlton Moore/Public Works
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
87
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT,
ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 98-07,
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 98-07 ,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS,
AND AUTHORIZING RECEIPT OF BIDS.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
City Engineer related to the City-wide random curb and gutter and sidewalk repair program
project.
.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The City Engineer’s Report regarding the City-wide random curb and gutter and sidewalk
repair work is hereby accepted.
2. The proposed project, designated as Project No. 98-07 is hereby established.
3. Project No. 98-07 is hereby ordered.
4. The plans and specifications for the making of the improvement as prepared under the
direction of the Director of Public Works are approved.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official
newspaper and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of
said improvement under said approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
appear not less than twenty one (21) days prior to the date and time bids will be received
by the City Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City
Clerk and accompanied by a cashier’s check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the
City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid.
6. The bids shall be tabulated by the Director of Public Works who shall report his
tabulation and recommendation to the City Council.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
88
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 11f*
Meeting of September 8, 1998
*11f. Bid Tabulation: One (1) New 4X4 Utility Vehicle
This report considers the purchase of One (1) new 4X4 Utility Vehicle.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to designate Superior Ford the lowest responsible bidder
for one (1) New 4X4 Utility Vehicle and authorize execution of a
purchase agreement with Superior Ford, Inc. in the amount of
$28,700.00.
Background: Proposals were received on August 20, 1998 for the purchase of One (1) New
4X4 Utility Vehicle as provided in the 1998 Capital Equipment Replacement Fund. An
advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor on August 12, 1998. Nine
(9) bid packets were issued to vendors throughout the metropolitan area. A summary of the bid
results are as follows:
Net Purchase
Vendor Price
Superior Ford, Inc. $28,700.00
Walser Ford, Inc. $29,577.00
Both bids are acceptable and meet the specifications as set forth by the City.
Financial Considerations: At the February 9, 1998 Study Session, the 1998 equipment
replacement process and proposed replacements were presented to the City Council. The 1998
program provided for the purchase of one (1) midsize vehicle for the Police Department. Upon
request and completion of a “need’s assessment” by management, it was determined there was
sufficient justification to upgrade to a 4X4 utility vehicle.
The Equipment Replacement Fund can support the additional cost (about $9,000) for the upgrade
of this vehicle.
Staff recommends the City Council designate Superior Ford, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder
and authorize purchase of the 4X4 utility vehicle as bid.
Prepared By: Harlan Backlund/Mike Rardin, Public Works
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
N:/Group/PW/Agenda/BT_PD4X4.doc