HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998/07/06 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular 1
6:30 p.m. - Executive Session re: DKH Settlement
7:25 p.m. - Economic Development Authority
AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
July 6, 1998
7:30 p.m.
1. Call to order
2. Presentation
2a. Parktacular Recognition
2b. St. Louis Park Royalty Introduction
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of Minutes
4a. City Council meeting of June 15, 1998
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
4b. City Council study session meeting of June 8, 1998
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
4c. City Council study session meeting of June 22, 1998
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
4d. Joint City Council/School Board meeting of June 24, 1998
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
4e. City Council special meeting of June 29, 1998
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
5. Approval of agenda
5a. Consent agenda
2
Note: All matters on consent (starred items) are considered to be routine and will be enacted by
one motion approving all. There is no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is
desired, the starred item will be moved to the regular agenda.
Action: Motion to approve - Motion to delete item(s)
5b. Agenda
Action: Motion to approve - Motion to add item(s)
*5c. Resolutions and Ordinances
Action: By consent, waive reading of resolutions and ordinances
6. Public Hearing
6a. Public Hearing on the Resolution Giving Preliminary Approval to a Project
and Its Financing Under the Municipal Industrial Development Act; Referring
the Proposal to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic
Development for Approval; Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of an
Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of Expenses; and Authorizing
Preparation of Necessary Documents
The resolution would give preliminary approval to the issuance of revenues bonds
and refunding revenue bonds for the Sholom Home West Project, Inc. Proceeds
from the sale of the bonds will be used, together with funds supplied by the
Corporation to refinance an existing real estate mortgage loan, fund a debt service
reserve fund and pay issuance costs.
The project, Shalom Home West, consists of a three-story brick exterior skilled
nusing home containing 170 beds located in St. Louis Park at 3620 Philips
Parkway.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to approve the resolution .
6b. Zoning Ordinance amendment to “I-G” General Industrial District.
Case 98-13-ZA
Lund Real Properties is requesting a Zoning Ordinance amendment to allow offices
over 50% of the gross floor area to be Permitted with Conditions in the“I-G”
General Industrial District.
3
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to waive First Reading of
the proposed ordinance amendment and set second reading for
July 20, 1998.
6c. First Reading
Case No. 98-15-ZA
Zoning Code Text Amendment
Text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to require screening of recreational
vehicles parked in the side and rear yards on lots in residential zoning districts.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to waive first reading of
Zoning Ordinance amendments, approve ordinance, and set
second reading for July 20, 1998.
6d. Amendment to special permit at 8332 Highway 7 (Knollwood Mall)
Case Number 98-16-CUP
General Growth Properties is requesting a major amendment to the special permit
for Knollwood Mall to allow Cub Foods to occupy the space formerly occupied by
Montgomery Wards and to reconfigure the parking lot and loading area.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to adopt a resolution
approving the special permit amendment subject to the
conditions included in the resolution.
7. Petitions, Requests, Communications
7a. Presentation on Wolfe Park Improvements by Community Development Staff
8. Resolutions and Ordinances
8a. Approval of a 1998 Labor Agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and
Law enforcement Labor Services (LELS) Local #218 covering Police
Sergeants.
Police supervisors are in agreement with a one year contract for 1998.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the labor
Agreement for 1998 for Police Sergeants, LELS #218
8b. CDBG Third Party Agreement Perspectives, Inc.
4
This report proposes entering into a CDBG Third Party Agreement with
Perspectives, Inc. related to approved activities under the CDBG-funded Multi-
Family Neighborhood Revitalization program.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City
Manager to execute a Third Party Agreement with Perspectives,
Inc.
8c. Second Reading of Ordinance to Amend Section 9-113, Restrictions on Water
Use.
This report considers an ordinance that provides for emergency controls on water
use in case of an emergency water shortage.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to waive the second reading, adopt the ordinance
amendment relating to water restrictions, and approve the
summary of the ordinance for publication.
8d*. Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 16-98 with Hardrives, Inc. W. 35th Street
- Raleigh Avenue to cul-de-sac east of Highway 100 - Project No. 16-98.
This report considers the removal of the existing high street crown, grading,
compacting and installing new 2” thick bituminous base.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing execution of
Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $20,748.00 to Contract No.
16-98 with Hardrives, Inc., increasing the total contract amount
from $143,011.00 to $163,759.00.
8e. Resolution authorizing Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Grant
Application.
The Council is requested to adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
apply to the Metropolitan Council for a Livable Communities Demonstration
Account Grant to help offset construction costs for redeveloping the first block in
the Park Commons Phase One area (north of Excelsior Boulevard and west of
Ottawa Avenue).
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing application for the
Livable Communities Demonstration Program requesting
funding for Park Commons Redevelopment Phase One, Block 1.
9. Reports from Officers, Boards, Committees
5
*9a. Planning Commission Minutes May 20, 1998
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*9b. Planning Commission Minutes June 3, 1998
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*9c. Housing Authority Minutes May 13, 1998
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*9d. NRC Minutes May 13, 1998
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*9e. Vendor Claim Report
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
10. Unfinished Business
a. Board and Commission Appointment(s)
Action: Motion to appoint Herbert Isbin to the Human Right Commission and to
re-appoint Bridget Gothberg for another term to the Housing Authority.
11. New Business
11a. DKH Settlement
Dependent on discussion to take place in executive session prior to the regular City
Council meeting, action by the Council may be required.
Recommended
Action:
To be determined following discussion with City Attorney
11b. Authorization of Trail and Sidewalk Plan
Request for authorization to undertake the preparation of a City-wide trail and
sidewalk plan for inclusion into the Comprehensive Plan.
6
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the scope of work for the City-Wide Trail and
Sidewalk Plan project and to authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to execute a contract with Close Landscape
Architecture for professional services to complete the Plan
12. Miscellaneous
13. Claims, Appropriations, Contract Payments
a. Contract payments
Payment - Final
Hardrives, Inc. - Contract No. 4086 $49,129.40
Park Place Boulevard/W. 16th Street & Gamble Drive
Matt Bullock Contracting - Contract No. 4165 $8,654.55
Twin Lakes/Oak Park Village
Action: By consent adopt resolutions.
Partials
Midwest Asphalt Corporation - Contract No. 17-98 $243,634,11
Ford Road/Shelard Parkway/Ford Lane
Hardrives, Inc. - Contract No. 14-98 $151,481.80
Construction of Excelsior Boulevard - Phase 2
Monterey Ave. to France Ave.
Ron Kassa Construction, Inc. - Contract No. 19-98 $11,987.40
Random concrete repair
Hardrives, Inc. - Contract No. 16-98 $73,728.45
W. 35th/W. 36th/W. 23rd/W. 24th Street/Utica Avenue
Action: By consent approve and authorize payments
14. Communications
15. Adjournment
7
Item 4a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
June 15, 1998
1. Call to Order
Mayor Dorfman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
2. Presentation - None
3. Roll Call
The following Councilmembers were present at roll call: Jeff Jacobs, Chris Nelson, Sue Sanger,
Ron Latz, Robert Young, Jim Brimeyer, and Mayor Gail Dorfman.
Also present were the Executive Director (Mr. Meyer); City Attorney (Mr. Scott); Director of
Community Development (Mr. Harmening); Economic Development Coordinator (Mr.
Anderson); Director of Public Works (Mr. Rardin); Public Works Administrative Assistant (Mr.
Roth); and Director of Inspections (Mr. Peterson).
4. Approval of Minutes
4a. City Council meeting of June 2, 1998
With the exception of the following changes, the minutes were approved as presented: Page 5,
Item 4, Change Baines to Bain in two different sentences. Page 8, Item 11a, Change that Rollin
Crawford represented the building owner rather than the tenant Pink Business Interiors. Page 9,
Add that Elizabeth Shreves was President of the Creekside Neighborhood Association and
change John Holsye to Hoisve, and note that John Hoisve, Randy Manthey and Paul Green
represented the Brooklawns Neighborhood.
4b. City Council meeting of May 18, 1998 (corrected minutes)
With the exception of the following changes, the minutes were approved as presented; Page 13,
Item 6a, change Rick Baines to Bain in two different sentences.
5. Approval of Agendas
8
5a. Consent Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Nelson, to approve the
consent agenda with removal of Item 8d per Councilmember Nelson. The motion passed 7-0.
5b. Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Sanger to approve the
agenda. The motion passed 7-0.
5c. Resolution and Ordinances
By consent, Council waived reading of resolutions and ordinances.
6. Public Hearing
6a. Liquor License hearing for Yvette’s restaurant
Mr. Peterson, Director of Inspections indicated that a police report had been received and
approved, but a Certificate of Occupancy had not yet been issued.
The Mayor closed the public hearing with the right of the Council to reopen it at a future date.
It was moved by Councilmember Young, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to approve the
application for intoxicating liquor on-sale and Sunday sale, subject to issuance of the food
establishment license and Certificate of Occupancy. The motion passed 7-0.
6b. Assessment Hearing for Project 98-06 at Louisiana Court
Resolution # 98-85
There being no one wanting to speak, the Mayor closed the public hearing with the right of the
Council to reopen it at a future date. Councilmember Latz stated that this project was an
opportunity to invest as partners with the property owners and residents of Louisiana Court to
improve the neighborhood. He indicated that the Council desired to establish the special
assessment at the 70% level as originally proposed and believed it was in the best interest of the
City and Louisiana Court to step back and examine future investment using the CDGB funds if
consensus and commitment of the property owners to make other improvements to the area was
achieved.
It was moved by Councilmember Latz, seconded by Councilmember Brimeyer to adopt the
attached resolution establishing the assessment for Project No. 98-06. The motion passed 7-0.
9
6c. Public Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance to Amend Section 9-113,
Restrictions on Water Use
Mike Roth, Public Works Administrative Assistant reviewed the five community responses and
trigger levels from the Water Contingency and Conservation Plan adopted by Council on April
20, 1998 outlined in the staff report.
Councilmember Jacobs asked staff what was the normal water supply capacity. Mike Roth,
Public Works indicated that 9.5 million gallons was the City’s capacity for storage.
The Mayor closed the public hearing with the right of the Council to reopen it at a future date.
Councilmember Jacobs indicated a concern about the compliance and enforcement policy and
was not comfortable with the statement that failure to comply with the restrictions imposed after
two documented violations was grounds for discontinuance of water service, but rather favored
administrative charges and other penalty options.
Mr. Roth clarified the language and circumstances for enforcement, but indicated that it was not
standard practice to discontinue water service.
Mr. Meyer, City Manager indicated that the intent of the language was to conform with the rest
of the ordinance to indicate that failure to comply with the restrictions imposed after two
documented violations could be grounds for discontinuance of water service.
Councilmember Sanger asked what was the time frame that two violations could occur before
penalties activated.
Mr. Roth clarified that two documented violations during a declared water emergency would be
grounds for discontinuance.
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the
first reading of ordinance amendment relating to water restrictions and set second reading for
July 6, 1998.
The motion passed 7-0.
7. Petitions, Requests, Communications - None
8. Resolutions and Ordinances
8a. 2nd Reading
Case No. 98-11-ZA
Zoning Code Text Amendment
Ordinance #2120-98
10
Councilmember Latz questioned if the proposed language related to congestion in Item G8 was
adequate for the Zoning Administrator to take the appropriate action.
Mr. Harmening clarified that the intention of the language was to follow similar ordinances, but
stated that the language could be made more specific to include circulation or congestion
problems that occur on the site as well and would not be inconsistent with what the Zoning
Administrator would look at as part of a site plan review.
Councilmember Latz recommended the language be amended to read if unforeseen circulation or
congestion problems occur on the site or which causes traffic to back up on public streets.
Mr. Meyer stated that the language could simply read if unforeseen circulation or congestion
occurs with the understanding that this applied to both on site and off site problems. Mr. Scott,
City Attorney indicated that either language was appropriate.
It was moved by Councilmember Latz, seconded by Councilmember Brimeyer to waive second
reading of Zoning Ordinance amendments with recommended language changes to Item G8,
adopt Ordinance, approve summary publication, and authorize publication.
The motion passed 7-0.
8b. Case No. 98-4-ZA
Zoning Code Text Amendment
Ordinance #2121-98
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Nelson, to waive second
reading of Zoning Ordinance text amendments, approve summary ordinance, and authorize
publication.
The motion passed 7-0.
8c. 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program Awards
Resolution # 98-86
By consent, Council adopted a resolution approving the 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Grant
Program Applications and authorized the Mayor and City Manager to execute grant agreements
with the neighborhoods.
8d. Bid Tabulation: Wolfe Park Pavilion and Picnic Shelters
Councilmember Nelson requested that the public be shown the plans for the construction of the
Wolfe Park Pavilion and Picnic Shelters. Mayor Dorfman recommended that staff prepare visual
materials to present at next Council meeting.
11
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Jacobs, to designate M.C.
Magney Construction, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to execute a contract with the firm in the amount of $546,500.
The motion passed 7-0.
8e. Purchase Agreement - Hutchinson Spur
Resolution # 98-87
Mr. Harmening presented a staff report and explained the trail south of 36th street and how the
easement in that area related to the location of that trail. He recommended that Council amend
the purchase agreement and authorize an acquisition price up to $506,500 to include the purchase
of a three foot easement on the back side or the owner’s lots for $6,500. Mr. Harmening
indicated that the consultants believed this would be beneficial in that it would not require any
disturbance to the school property, eliminate containing wall construction, limit tree removal,
improve overall trail design aspect in the area ,and the cost savings would be commensurate with
the added expense.
It was moved by Councilmember Latz, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve a
purchase agreement with amendment for the acquisition of land with and easements on portions
of former Hutchinson Spur railroad right-of-way and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to
execute said document, and any other related documents, and to approve a resolution waiving
application of the City’s subdivision regulations to allow recording of a metes and bounds
conveyance.
The motion passed 7-0.
9. Reports from Officers, Boards, Committees
9a. Vendor Claim Report
By consent, Council accepted report for filing.
9b. Human Rights Commission Minutes of May, 1998
By consent, Council accepted report for filing.
10. Unfinished Business
10a. Board and Commission Appointment(s) None
11. New Business
12
11a. Authorization of Comprehensive Plan Loan
By consent, Council approved loan agreement and authorized the Mayor and City Manager to
execute loan agreement.
12. Miscellaneous - None
13. Claims, Appropriations, Contract Payments - None
14. Communications
Mayor Gail Dorfman reviewed the schedule of Parktacular events and activities and thanked the
Parktacular Committee and Park and Recreation Commission for their efforts to organize the
event.
15. Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was made by Councilmember Brimeyer and seconded by Councilmember
Jacobs. The meeting adjourned at 8:15 p.m.
The motion passed 7-0.
City Clerk Mayor
13
Item 4b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
June 8, 1998
The meeting convened at 5:40 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Jeff Jacobs, Chris Nelson, Robert Young, Jim
Brimeyer and Mayor Gail Dorfman.
Sue Sanger arrived at 6:00 p.m. and Ron Latz at 6:35 p.m.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Meyer); Director of Community Development (Mr.
Harmening); Planning Coordinator (Ms. Erickson); Planning Manager (Ms. Jeremiah); Economic
Development Coordinator (Mr. Anderson); Public Works Director (Mr. Rardin); Housing
Coordinator (Ms. Brownstein); EDA Attorney (Mr. Lindahl); City Attorney (Mr. Bubul) and City
Attorney Staff (Mr. Jamnik).
1. Park Commons Discussion
a. Wolfe Park Construction Issues
Janet Jeremiah, Planning Manager and Greg Ingraham, Planning Consultant (Ingraham & Voss
Inc.), presented outcome of the bids for the main park pavilion and picnic shelters and status of
the budget as outlined in the staff report and indicated that staff recommended awarding the
contract for the pavilion (with fireplace) and one picnic shelter.
Council reviewed alternatives for award/rejection of the bids, discussed anticipated usage of
picnic shelters, parking options, and construction schedule.
The architect reviewed the location of the construction on the site and changes to the design of
the pavilion and picnic shelters for Council. Ms. Jeremiah noted that the shelter dividers
originally discussed were not included in the construction cost, but could be considered in design
and added later. She also indicated that the dividers were not necessary until types of shelter use
were determined. Council agreed that the goal was to create an infrastructure for a Town Center
with a lot of development around it.
Council recommended accepting the low bid for the pavilion and the two picnic shelters which
would minimize future disruption to the park and would involve some cost savings compared to
building the second shelter at a future time.
14
b. Park Commons Regulatory Plan
Janet Jeremiah gave a staff report and requested that Council initiate amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan “M-X” Mixed Use District to facilitate redevelopment in the Park
Commons area. The proposed amendments would ensure that any redevelopment would
conform with the vision for the area. Staff also requested that Council initiate rezoning the Park
Commons Phase I area to the amended “M-X” Mixed Use District.
Judie Erickson stressed the importance of having regulations in place before development plans
are submitted. She indicated that revisions to the Comprehensive Plan should be completed by
the end of the 1998 but that an extension could be filed.
Council discussed the need for flexibility in the “M-X” Mixed Use District and suggested adding
language to incorporate livable communities principles. Mayor Dorfman asked about the status
of the development of architectural design standards. Ms. Erickson stated that standards are all
together and will be tested by individual scenarios. Mr. Harmening believed that keeping area
businesses informed of the overall vision for the area had been helpful in keeping the cooperation
of owners in complying with the standards.
Ms. Jeremiah asked if Council was willing to continue to meet regularly before study session
meetings to discuss items relating to Park Commons. Council agreed to meet once per month for
the time deemed necessary to review issues.
Mr. Harmening informed Council that a purchase agreement for the Evelyn Raymond property
could be completed by the first City Council Meeting in July and indicated that the City had
received several calls from single family home owners in the Wolfe Park area who were
interested in starting the appraisal process. He indicated that next year temporary parking lots
would need to be developed to accommodate business owners during transition and
implementation of the first phase.
2. Civic Club Memberships
Mr. Meyer explained the results of a recent informal poll he took of six nearby cities in the
western suburbs that determined if cities paid for civic memberships for the City Manager,
Senior Staff; Mayor and Councilmembers. He asked the City Council if they had any concerns
about paying for memberships for department heads at the discretion of the City Manager and if
they would like to see a policy developed for paying for such memberships for Mayor and City
Council.
Councilmember Sanger questioned the definition of a civic club and Council recommended that
some guidelines be developed to determine the legitimacy of the club membership.
The Council agreed to pay membership dues for department heads involved in local civic
organizations at the discretion of the City Manager, but didn’t find it appropriate for the City to
develop a policy to pay for such memberships for the Mayor and City Council.
15
3. Funding for Public Art - Evelyn Raymond Memorial
Councilmember Brimeyer gave a brief history of a plan to develop an ongoing fund for Public
Art. He stated, that if Council was in favor of the idea, the next step would be to go the Friends
of the Arts and ask them how a plan could be adopted and then determine if the Evelyn Raymond
estate would be interested.
Councilmember Nelson recommended that in the future a historical society building or room be
developed to preserve art work. Mayor Dorfman noted that there had been a recommendation to
recreate a studio that looked similar to Evelyn’s studio and recommended that pictures be taken
before building was demolished.
Councilmember Sanger asked if the purpose of this fund was the same as the art fund already
established.
Councilmember Brimeyer stated that the purpose was the same, however attaching Evelyn’s
name to it gave it stature that the fund didn’t have before.
The Council discussed the Friends of the Arts and their role in developing the fund and
recommended having a representative attend a meeting to explain their vision.
Councilmember Brimeyer indicated that the work of Evelyn Raymond was permitted to be on
display, but not permitted to be sold.
4. Louisiana Court - Sidewalk and Streetlighting Improvements
Councilmember Latz gave an update on the status of the coalition of the property owners and
indicated that the group would not be able to meet a time line consistent with the decision of the
Council because the landlords have not been able to get together.
Councilmember Latz stated that he had received an apology from Bill Christoferson, one of the
property owners for the way the issue was handled at the last City Council meeting. The group
still desired to work together and discussions among the owners have been held. Councilmember
Latz reviewed a list of initiatives and/or agreements owners were willing to undertake to better
standardize the maintenance and management of Louisiana Court.
Council discussed options to proceed with the original assessment of 70% and perhaps at a later
date direct additional CDBG funds to the project.
Mr. Meyer stated that the Crime Free Multi-Housing program had really worked out a lot of these
standards, was in operation nationally, and will be given priority to Louisiana Court for the
program and give them a start on some of the items on the list of initiatives/and or agreements by
property owners.
Joanna Brownstein, Housing Coordinator, noted that following publication of an article in the
Sun Sailor she had received 13-14 calls from tenants in Mr. Bain’s buildings describing
16
significant rent increases over the last year. The article indicated that owners had promised not
to raise rents as a result of the proposed project, and tenants expressed their distrust that Bain
would pass on these costs. She shared Jeannie Seeley-Smith’s (Perspectives) disappointment
that the owners did not feel that Perspectives was their partner at the table.
Council indicated that the City was committed to work to provide incentives for property owners
to invest and be involved in Louisiana Court, discussed how they desired to see commitment of
the property owners to be formalized, commented on the proposed assessment process and
reviewed the original intention of CDBG funds. They commented on Louisiana Court
improvements being maintenance versus investment and having any imposed tax assessments
reconsidered after improvements were made.
Council directed staff to explore options to accomplish the vision and to design incentives to
encourage property owners to participate in this mutual agreement.
Vanessa Brown gave a brief update on a recent neighborhood meeting at the new community
room. She was concerned that if the 30% was taken back it would be devastating to the progress
that had already been made with property owners, and that many of the tenants on limited or
fixed incomes could lose their housing.
5. Billboard Site Acquisition Relating to the Highway 7 and Louisiana Avenue
Development Proposal by Frauenshuh Companies
Dave Anderson, Economic Development Coordinator gave a staff report and reviewed the
options for addressing the billboard issue on the subject site and handed out a memorandum from
Tom Scott, City Attorney that addressed the issue of P.U.D.
Mayor Dorfman asked if it was the developer’s first choice to remove the billboard from site.
Mr. Anderson stated that if economics were not a factor, removal of the billboard from the site to
allow development would be the best case scenario. He also said that the City Attorney had
indicated that movement of the billboard could be allowed under a PUD while still maintaining
the integrity of the rest of the city’s ordinances relative to billboards.
Mayor Gail Dorfman asked what legal precedent would be set for other legal non conforming
issues down the road.
Joel Jamnik stated it should set little or no precedent legally, but from a policy perspective there
may be a conflict.
Mr. Lindahl stated that legally condemnation could be justified.
It was moved by Councilmember Brimeyer, seconded by Councilmember Young to convene to
Executive Session. The motion passed 7-0.
(At this point Council recessed. The topic of billboard acquisition was discussed.)
17
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Brimeyer to adjourn
Executive Session. The motion passed 7-0.
(Council reconvened in the Council Chambers)
Mr. Anderson stated that if amenable to the City Council, the developer would be interested in
exploring the options to relocate the billboard on the project site
Council reviewed the proposed development design in regards to the billboard and discussed the
site line and visibility as it relates to the relocation of the building and the height of the proposed
building. Options of moving the billboard or leaving it in place were discussed.
Mike Denny stated that leaving the billboard in its current location would not be feasible from
the developers perspective.
Mr. Anderson indicated that another alternative may exist with the SPS Companies site. He
explained that there are two existing billboards on that property and an agreement requires that as
of March, 1998 and May, 1998 the leases not be extended without authorization of the EDA. It
may be possible to move the existing Fairway billboard to the SPS site as a means to provide a
relocation alternative. Reconstruction costs, land market value, and ordinance requirements
would be examined as considerations.
Mr. Meyer stated that the options were to actively pursue relocation verses pursuing
condemnation in the area and the SPS Companies option may be added.
Mr. Anderson believed that moving the billboard to another location on the site presented the
most economical approach, and perhaps looking at the SPS option as a relocation alternative.
Privately negotiated acquisition would be a secondary option and lastly, condemnation.
Mayor Dorfman stated that the best case scenario would be a negotiated agreement with the
owner and then a development agreement with the developer.
The Council expressed their view that condemnation was the least preferred option and all other
options should be explored before condemnation was considered
6. 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Program Grant Applications
Council reviewed the 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Grant Program applications and briefly
discussed the reason for not granting NRC funds to the Birchwood neighborhood for a study on
the impacts of the railroad.
Councilmember Sanger explained that the Birchwood neighborhood request was for education
materials and they were aware that they could not do any environmental studies.
18
Mayor Dorfman stated that NRC grant money was not to be used to duplicate money being used
by other City departments. She questioned the intentions of the neighborhood who desired to do
a separate study and recommended that they wait for the results of the studies being conducted by
the City. She indicated that this was not the only mechanism to raise issues that were of concern
to them in their neighborhood.
Councilmember Sanger understood that the study was intended be supplemental in nature.
Ms. Brownstein indicated that that the Neighborhood Revitalization Committee denied the
neighborhoods request because the application was incomplete and the only specific activity that
was described was hiring legal research staff. Ms. Brownstein allowed the neighborhood
additional time to provide more information, but they did not provide more information and
couldn’t come to the meetings.
Ms. Brownstein briefly explained a new type of request made by the Fernhill Neighborhood
Association to develop a mini-grant program.
7. One Year Review of Economic Development Strategic Plan Activities
Staff updated Council on development activities.
The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
19
Item #4c
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
June 22, 1998
The meeting convened at 7:05 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Chris Nelson, Robert Young, Jim Brimeyer and
Mayor Gail Dorfman.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Meyer); Director of Community Development (Mr.
Harmening); Planning Coordinator (Ms. Erickson); Public Works Director (Mr. Rardin) and City
Clerk (Ms. Larsen)
Mr. Meyer requested that we add an item to the agenda: Street Reconstruction Change Order.
1. Scope of Work for Trails and Sidewalks Plan
Community Development staff met with Council to discuss the process, associated costs and
scope of work for a Trails and Sidewalks Plan to meet the goals of Vision St. Louis Park and to
be incorporated as part of the Comprehensive Plan.
Judie Erickson explained the three proposed phases, with phase 1 consisting of data collection
and visioning with the City Council determining the parameters which define the extent and type
of system to be construction. Phase Two would include working with a citizen task force and
various commissions and holding open houses to help design the trail and sidewalk system. The
final phase would identify funding sources and implement strategies for construction.
Mayor Dorfman asked how the trail study will tie in to the overall development of the
community. Ms. Erickson said that the trail study would be part of the transportation section of
the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
Councilmember Sanger said that she felt the study is very important and encouraged public
comment and involvement. She felt that Council needed to clearly address the question of
sidewalk plowing and responsibility for payment for snow plowing services. She also felt the
proposed task force makeup was too “top heavy” and encouraged greater involvement by
neighborhood groups.
Mr. Meyer stressed the importance of Phase I where Council would address larger issues and
work to develop policy prior to turning the project over to a task force.
Council agreed that their role should be to clearly identify parameters within which the task force
could effectively operate.
20
Tom Harmening informed Council that the scope of work would be brought forward for approval
at the July 6th meeting.
2. Street Reconstruction Change Order
Mr. Meyer and Mr. Rardin informed Council that they would be seeing a sizable change order on
the agenda for July 6th. This change order would pertain to a street reconstruction project where
substandard work done on the street many years ago had seriously impacted the current project
causing costs to rise considerably.
3. Communications
Council briefly discussed the agenda for the joint City Council/School Board meeting to be held
on Wednesday, July 24th.
Councilmember Young pointed out an article included in the most recent edition of “Minnesota
Cities” about Tax Increment Financing.
Mayor Dorfman suggested that the City should recognize Parktacular volunteers and city staff for
their efforts.
Mr. Rardin and Mr. Meyer informed Council of the upcoming reorganization of the Public
Works Department.
The meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
21
Item #4d
(To be approved at School Board Meeting July 13, 1998)
Unofficial Minutes of the Special Joint School Board/City Council Meeting
Wednesday, June 24, 1998
5:30 p.m. - St. Louis Park Recreation Center
The Joint School Board/City Council Meeting (Independent School District No. 283 of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota) was held on June 24, 1998, 5:30 p.m. at the St. Louis Park Recreation Center.
Present from the City were Council Members: Susan Sanger, Chris Nelson, Ron Latz, Robert
Young, Jeff Jacobs, and Jim Brimeyer. Mayor Gail Dorfman, Clint Pires, Tom Harmening, Ernie
Peterson and Harvey Feldman were present from City Hall. School Board members present
were: Bob Disch, Betty Shaw, Jerry Timian, Julie DiGravina, Deb Bohn, Keith Broady and Al
Silver. Also present were ex-officio member Superintendent Barbara Pulliam, Tom Stringer, and
Bridget Gothberg.
The School Board and City Council members discussed the following topics:
• Joint Athletic Facilities
• School Programs and Facilities
• Hutchinson-Spur Line
• Railroad Issue
• St. Louis Park Strategic Planning
Meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted, Approved:
Deb Bohn, Clerk Alan Silver, Chair
22
Item #4e
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING
June 29, 1998 - 7:30 a.m.
1. Call to order
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Gail Dorfman at 7:35 a.m.
Councilmembers present: Jim Brimeyer, Ron Latz, Jeff Jacobs, Robert Young and Mayor Gail
Dorfman
Staff Present: City Manager (Mr. Meyer); Director of Community Development (Mr.
Harmening); City Attorney (Mr. Scott) and City Clerk (Ms. Larsen).
2. Resolution approving revised purchase agreement for the purchase of the Hutchinson
Spur property
Resolution # 98-88
Councilmember Brimeyer made a motion to approve a resolution revising the Purchase
Agreement to incorporate new language accepting portions of the former Hutchinson Spur
property as a donation.
Councilmember Latz asked about the revised language. Tom Scott responded that the new
language indicates that portions of the land are a donation, but does not state whether the
donation is or is not tax deductible and said that the IRS will be responsible for determining the
deductibility of the donation.
Mr. Harmening pointed out that the purchase price will remain the same whether or not the IRS
determines that the donation is tax deductible and that the seller will have no recourse against the
City in the future based on the decision of the IRS.
Motion was seconded by Councilmember Jacobs. Motion passed unanimously.
3. Communications
Mr. Meyer commented briefly on storm damage clean-up
4. Adjournment
A motion to adjourn was made by Robert Young and seconded by Ron Latz. The meeting was
adjourned at 7:42 a.m.
_______________________________ ______________________________
City Clerk Mayor
23
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #6a
Meeting of July 6, 1998
6a. Public Hearing on the Resolution Giving Preliminary Approval to a Project
and Its Financing Under the Municipal Industrial Development Act; Referring
the Proposal to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic
Development for Approval; Authorizing the Execution and Delivery of an
Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of Expenses; and Authorizing
Preparation of Necessary Documents
The resolution would give preliminary approval to the issuance of revenues bonds
and refunding revenue bonds for the Sholom Home West Project, Inc. Proceeds
from the sale of the bonds will be used, together with funds supplied by the
Corporation to refinance an existing real estate mortgage loan, fund a debt service
reserve fund and pay issuance costs.
The project, Shalom Home West, consists of a three-story brick exterior skilled
nusing home containing 170 beds located in St. Louis Park at 3620 Philips
Parkway.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to approve the
resolution .
Background:
The City first authorized the issuance $8,000,000 of mortgage housing revenue bonds for this
project in 1989. This request will provide for the refinancing of this debt.
Shalom Home have completed the forms required with each application for private activity
bonds. The $1,500 application fee has been received. Because this is a refinancing, the new
bonds will become subject to the City’s semi-annual administrative fee for private activity bonds
of 1/8th of 1% of the outstanding balance.
The application and related draft bond documents are not attached to this report due to their size.
Copies of all documents can be made available by contacting the Director of Finance.
Paul Tietz, the City’s Bond Counsel, and representatives from Shalom Community Alliance will
attend the public hearing and be available to answer any questions.
24
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the attached resolution be approved to give preliminary approval to the
project and its financing.
Attachments:
• Resolution
Prepared by: Kathleen McBride, Director of Finance
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
25
RESOLUTION NO. ____________
RESOLUTION GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO A PROJECT AND
ITS FINANCING UNDER THE MUNICIPAL INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
ACT; REFERRING THE PROPOSAL TO THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRADE AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FOR APPROVAL;
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY
OF AN AGREEMENT AS TO INDEMNITY AND PAYMENT OF EXPENSES;
AND AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF NECESSARY DOCUMENTS
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota (the “City”), as follows:
SECTION 1
Recitals and Findings
1.1 This Council has received a proposal that the City issue its revenue bonds and
refunding revenue bonds to refinance a portion or all of the cost of a project (collectively, the
“Project”) under its Home Rule Charter and Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 to 169.165, as
amended (the “Act”), on behalf of Sholom Home West, Inc. (the “Borrower”), consisting of the
issuance of up to $7,000,000 revenue bonds on behalf of the Borrower.
1.2 The Project consists of a three-story brick exterior skilled nursing home containing
170 beds located in the City at 3620 Philips Parkway owned and operated by the Borrower.
1.3 This Council has been advised by representatives of the Borrower that (i)
conventional commercial financing to refinance the cost of the Project is available only on a
limited basis and at such high costs of borrowing that, with the aid of municipal borrowing, and
its resulting lower borrowing cost, the Project is economically more feasible, and (ii) the
refinancing of the Project would not be undertaken but for the availability of tax exempt revenue
bond financing.
1.4 This Council has also been advised by Norwest Investment Services, Inc. that, on
the basis of their discussions with potential buyers of tax-exempt bonds, revenue bonds and
refunding revenue bonds of the City could be issued and sold upon favorable rates and terms to
finance the Project.
26
SECTION 2
Determination to Proceed with
the Project and its Financing
2.1 On the basis of the information given the City to date, it appears that it would be desirable of
the City to issue its revenue bonds under the provisions of the Act to refinance the Project in the
maximum aggregate principal amount of $7,000,000.
2.2 It is hereby determined to proceed with the Project and its financing and this Council hereby
declares its present intent to have the City issue its revenue bonds under its Home Rule Charter and the
Act to refinance the Project. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the adoption of this resolution shall
not be deemed to establish a legal obligation on the part of the City or its City Council to issue such
revenue bonds. All details of such revenue bond issue and the provisions for payment thereof shall be
subject to final approval of the Project by the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic
Development and may be subject to such further conditions as the City may specify. The revenue bonds,
if issued, shall not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any property of the
City, except the revenues specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and each bond, when, as and if
issued, shall recite in substance that the bonds, including interest thereon, is payable solely from the
revenues and property specifically pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute a debt of the
City within the meaning of any constitutional, statutory or charter limitation.
2.3 The Application to the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development in
substantially the form on file with the City (the “Application”), with all attachments and exhibits, is
hereby approved, and the Mayor, City Manager and City Clerk are authorized to execute said documents
on behalf of the City, with such changes, additions or deletions as the Mayor, City Manager and the City
Clerk deem appropriate.
2.4 In accordance with Section 469.154, Subd. 3 of the Act, the Mayor, City Manger and City
Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to cause the Application to be submitted to the Minnesota
Department of Trade and Economic Development for approval of the Project. The Mayor, City Manager,
City Clerk, City Attorney and other officers, employees and agents of the City are hereby authorized and
directed to provide the Minnesota Department of Trade and Economic Development with any preliminary
information needed for this purpose. The City Attorney and/or Special Counsel for the City is authorized
to initiate and assist in the preparation of such documents as may be appropriate with respect to the
issuance of the revenue bonds, if approved by the Department.
2.5 This resolution and the intentions set forth herein are subject to the members of the
Borrower entering into the Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of Expenses, between the City and
the Obligated Group substantially in the form approved by this resolution with such changes as approved
by the City Manager.
2.6 Briggs and Morgan, Professional Association is hereby designated as Bond Counsel and is
authorized to proceed with the preparation of documents as directed by the Borrower.
27
SECTION 3
Authorization of An Agreement as to
Indemnity and Payment of Expenses
3.1 The form of Agreement as to Indemnity and Payment of Expenses presented to this
meeting is hereby approved in substantially the form so presented for use in connection with the
revenue bonds which may be issued to refinance the Project, and the Mayor, City Manager and
City Clerk are hereby authorized to execute such an agreement by and between the City and the
City of Shakopee with such changes, additions or deletions as the Mayor, City Manager and
Clerk deem appropriate.
SECTION 4
General
4.1 If the bonds are issued and sold, the City will enter into a loan agreement or similar
agreement satisfying the requirements of the Act (the “Revenue Agreement”) with the Borrower.
The loan payments or other amounts payable by the Borrower to the City under the Revenue
Agreement shall be sufficient to pay the principal of, and interest and redemption premium, if
any, on the bonds as and when the same become due and payable.
4.2 The Mayor, City Manager and City Clerk are directed, if the bonds are issued and
sold, thereafter to comply with the provisions of Section 469.154, Subdivisions 5 and 7 of the
Act.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
28
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #6b
Meeting of July 6, 1998
6b. Zoning Ordinance amendment to “I-G” General Industrial District.
Case 98-13-ZA
Lund Real Properties is requesting a Zoning Ordinance amendment to allow offices
over 50% of the gross floor area to be Permitted with Conditions in the“I-G”
General Industrial District.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to waive First Reading of
the proposed ordinance amendment and set second reading for
July 20, 1998.
Background: Lund Real Properties has purchased the former School of Communication Arts
building at 5051 Highway 7 (at the southeast quadrant of Highway 7 and Highway 100). Data
Source Hagen renovated the lower level of the building for office and warehouse use and would
like to renovate the upper level into office for its own use and additional leasable space. The
upper level renovation would put them in excess of the 50% floor area limitation on office as a
permitted accessory use in the “I-G” General Industrial District. Currently, offices over 50% of
the gross floor area in the “I-G” District can be considered by Conditional Use Permit. However,
there are certain conditions that must be met. One of the conditions is that the floor area ratio
(FAR) of the office use cannot exceed 0.5. Floor area ratio is derived by calculating the total
floor area of the use and dividing it by the total area of the property. The proposed renovation
would exceed the 0.5 FAR limitation for offices in the “I-G” District. It would not exceed the
1.0 FAR limitation for other allowable uses in the “I-G” District. The applicant is requesting an
ordinance amendment to remove the 0.5 FAR limitation for office uses in the “I-G” District.
Rather than being considered through a Conditional Use Permit process, the applicant is also
requesting that the use be Permitted with Conditions. This means that the conditions of approval
would be written into the Code. If a proposal met all of the conditions, it would receive a
building permit and/or occupancy permit without any public hearing or Council action.
The Planning Commission considered the proposed ordinance amendment on June 3, 1998 and
recommended approval on a vote of 6-0 subject to the conditions in the staff recommendation.
The recommended conditions have been included in the proposed ordinance language.
Issues:
• What are the potential adverse impacts of allowing offices over 0.5 FAR in the “I-G”
District?
• Can the impacts be controlled by Code requirements, thereby eliminating the need for a
public hearing?
29
Analysis of Issues:
• What are the potential adverse impacts of allowing offices over 0.5 FAR in the “I-G”
District?
Traffic: Offices generally have more employees compared to industrial uses occupying the same
size building. As such, offices generate more traffic. One concern would be if the additional
traffic would affect residential streets.
Parking: Since offices involve more employees, they also require more parking than industrial
uses. If the site does not have enough parking, people might park in drive aisles, fire lanes, or on
streets that may not be appropriate for parking. Therefore, inadequate parking would be a
concern.
Architectural Standards: Office districts are held to a higher architectural standard than industrial
districts. If offices were allowed to locate in industrial districts without being held to the higher
standard, it would raise equity issues and may provide a disincentive for offices to locate in
office districts.
Preservation of Industrial Areas: It is generally deemed important to preserve areas for industrial
uses, so that the employment and tax base of the City is diverse and can withstand economic
changes. Allowing offices over 0.5 FAR in the General Industrial District may diminish
opportunities for industrial uses to locate in the City, since office uses generally command higher
rents and therefore increase the value of the property above what industrial uses might be able to
pay. However, the higher property value also provides higher taxes for the City.
• Can the impacts be controlled by Code requirements, thereby eliminating the need for a
public hearing?
Staff believes the potential adverse impacts relating to traffic, parking, and architectural
standards can be adequately controlled by imposing strict conditions of approval within the Code.
Those conditions would be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator to ensure compliance before a
building permit or occupancy permit would be issued. Staff believes there will be few instances
where all of the conditions will be met to allow numerous large offices in General Industrial
Districts. Therefore, staff does not believe the issue of preserving industrial areas is a major
concern with regard to this request.
30
Recommendation:
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that offices occupying over 50% of the gross
floor area be Permitted with Conditions (rather than by Conditional Use Permit) in the “I-G”
General Industrial District subject to the following conditions:
a. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a collector or
arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be provided without generating
significant traffic on local residential streets.
b. The uses must meet all off-street parking requirements.
c. The building must meet exterior surface material requirements for non-industrial districts
as specified in Section 14:6-6.2(F)(2).
Attachment:
• Proposed Ordinance
Prepared by: Janet Jeremiah, Planning Manager, 924-2573
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
31
ORDINANCE NO.______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY
AMENDING SECTION 14:5-7.3
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Findings
Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 98-13-ZA)
Sec. 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 14:5-7.3 is hereby amended to read as
follows:
Add to C. USES PERMITTED WITH CONDITIONS
(Page 197)
14. OFFICE - (50% or more of gross floor area)
Conditions:
a. Access shall be to a roadway identified in the Comprehensive Plan as a
collector or arterial or shall be otherwise located so that access can be
provided without generating significant traffic on local residential streets.
b. The uses must meet all off-street parking requirements.
c. The building must meet exterior surface material requirements for non-
industrial districts as specified in Section 14:6-6.2(F)(2).
Delete from D. USES PERMITTED BY CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
(Page 198-199)
3. OFFICE - (50% or more of gross floor area)
Conditions: a through c
Renumber 4 to 3
Sec. 3. The contents of Planning Case File 98-13-ZA are hereby entered into and
made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Sec.4. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
32
Attest: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Manager City Attorney
98-13:RES12
33
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #6c
Meeting of July 6, 1998
6c. First Reading
Case No. 98-15-ZA
Zoning Code Text Amendment
Text amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to require screening of recreational
vehicles parked in the side and rear yards on lots in residential zoning districts.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to waive first reading of
Zoning Ordinance amendments, approve ordinance, and set
second reading for July 20, 1998.
Background:
On March 2, 1998, the City Council passed second reading of several proposed amendments to
the Zoning Ordinance regulating commercial and recreational vehicle parking in residential
zoning districts. Provisions relating to vehicle screening were excluded from the ordinance
amendments; and, at the time, the Council requested that prior to July 1, 1998, the issue of
vehicle screening be resolved.
The City Council discussed vehicle screening at a Study Session on April 27, 1998, and asked
staff to bring to the Planning Commission a Zoning Ordinance amendment which will address
screening of the following:
1. Screening of large RV’s which are parked in a rear yard where the rear yard abuts a street.
2. Screening of small RV’s which are parked on the non-driveway side of the house.
On June 3, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments
which would require screening of recreational vehicles in residential zoning districts in the above
stated locations. The Planning Commission deferred action at that time requesting staff to
expand screening provisions to include screening of large RV’s in the rear yard from adjacent
parks and also from abutting properties.
On June 17, 1998, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of text
amendments consistent with the Council’s direction, but which also expanded the screening
provisions to include screening from adjacent parks and abutting residential properties.
Screening Provisions:
The Ordinance as recommended by the Planning Commission requires screening of the following
two conditions:
34
1. Screening of small recreational vehicles parked in the non-driveway side of a house with a 6-
foot fence.
2. Screening of large recreational vehicles parked in the back yard from adjacent streets, parks,
and abutting residentially developed property with a 6-foot fence and landscaping.
The Planning Commission added provisions to back yard screening which would require
screening from nearby parks and from adjacent residential properties. If the Council chooses to
remove provisions added by the Planning Commission, they may do so simply by removing one
or more of the bulleted items on the first page of the proposed Ordinance.
The proposed amendments have been reviewed by Inspections and were found acceptable in
terms of ability to interpret and enforce. The language has also been reviewed and found
acceptable by the City Attorney.
Attachments: Proposed Ordinance
Prepared by: Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
35
ORDINANCE NO. ______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY AMENDING
SECTIONS
14:5-4.1 RELATING TO
SCREENING OF RECREATIONAL VEHICLES
IN RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Findings
Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case Nos. 96-7-ZA & 98-15-ZA) and has adopted, contemporaneous with new
ordinance, the findings of City staff.
Sec. 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 14:5-4.1 Residential Restrictions and
Performance Standards is hereby amended to read as follows:
Section 14:5-4.1 RESIDENTIAL RESTRICTIONS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
C. General Provisions (Amend No. 9 by adding c. and No. 10.l)
9. One recreational vehicle which exceeds any of the limits set forth in paragraph 8 and is
owned by the occupant of the premises can be parked in the back yard area if:
a. The vehicle is parked no closer than 5 feet from any property line.
b. If the property is a multifamily property, the vehicle must be stored on a concrete
or bituminous surface and the parking space must be in excess of the minimum
number of parking spaces required by this Ordinance Code.
c. The vehicle shall be screened using a 90% opaque fence which is 6 feet high and
plant materials which at maturity have the ability to screen 100% of the height and
100% of the length of the vehicle with a minimum of 50% opacity from view
from:
• any park,
• any abutting residentially developed property
• any street which abuts the back yard.
36
The fence and plant materials shall be located in such a manner that visibility is
maintained as required in Section 14:4-10. A six-foot high gate may be placed in
the fence to allow for ingress and egress. Plant materials may be omitted at points
of ingress and egress but the gap in landscaping may not exceed the width of the
vehicle plus 2 feet.
10. Parking and storage of vehicles in the R-1, R-2, and R-3 Zoning Districts. The following
provisions shall apply to the parking and storage of vehicles on residential parcels.
l. Recreational vehicles 6 feet in height or less at their highest points may be parked
in one non-driveway side yard on a residentially zoned lot provided that they are
10 feet or more from the adjacent residence, do not extend beyond the front
building wall of the house, and are screened from the street and from the adjacent
neighbor with a 90% opaque fence with a height at least equal to the height of the
highest point of the vehicle to be screened.
Sec. 3 The contents of Planning Case Files 96-7-ZA & 98-15-ZA are hereby entered into
and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Sec. 4 This Ordinance shall take effect July 1, 1999.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
98-15:RES12
37
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #6d
Meeting of July 6, 1998
6d. Amendment to special permit at 8332 Highway 7 (Knollwood Mall)
Case Number 98-16-CUP
General Growth Properties is requesting a major amendment to the special permit
for Knollwood Mall to allow Cub Foods to occupy the space formerly occupied by
Montgomery Wards and to reconfigure the parking lot and loading area.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close the public hearing. Motion to adopt a resolution
approving the special permit amendment subject to the
conditions included in the resolution.
Background:
Zoning Designation: C-2, General Commercial
Comprehensive Plan Designation: Commercial
The applicant proposes to renovate the existing 130,000 square foot retail building space located
on the east end of the mall (formerly occupied by Montgomery Wards) into a 61,000 square foot
grocery store with 38,000 square feet of warehouse/storage and 25,000 square feet of office
space. The grocery store would be open 24 hours per day. In addition to the interior remodeling,
the project also includes a revised parking lot configuration, a remodeled exterior, new signs,
new landscaping, and the addition of a truck loading area along the north side of the building.
The Planning Commission considered the proposal on June 3, 1998 and recommended approval
on a vote of 6-0 subject to the conditions recommended by staff. The applicant submitted revised
plans that address most of the conditions and has agreed to further revise the plans to fully meet
the conditions.
Issues:
• Does the proposed renovation to a grocery store meet the requirements of the zoning code?
• Does the Cub Foods project meet the general conditions for amending the approved special
use permit?
• Have the traffic and circulation issues been adequately addressed?
• Are the screening and landscape buffering adequate to protect the nearby residential areas
from the impacts of the retail grocery and 24 hour operation?
38
Analysis of Issues:
• Does the proposed renovation to a grocery store meet the requirements of the zoning
code?
In general, the revised plans meet the zoning code requirements and staff recommendations. The
applicant has agreed to increase the proposed screen wall adjacent to the truck loading area to ten
feet to fully meet the requirements (see screening section of report).
Parking: The City Code requires the proposed grocery, warehouse and office use to provide a
minimum of 654 parking spaces. Due to the desire to provide 9½ foot wide parking spaces and
the limited area available to add parking, the applicant proposes to provide 600 spaces. They
have submitted a proof of parking plan, using 8½ foot wide spaces which meets the Code parking
requirements. If parking problems occur, the applicant would be required to reconfigure the
parking lot as shown on the proof of parking plan.
Shopping Centers: The C-2 section of the zoning code (Sec. 14:5-5.3, E 3, adopted in 1995)
contains ordinance conditions for large shopping centers which specify parking, accessory use,
screening, landscaping and exterior building material standards. The Knollwood Shopping
Center was constructed prior to enactment of these ordinance provisions and, as such, is not
required to meet these standards unless they expand the total floor area of the Mall and go
through a Planned Unit Development process. However, the standards provide a guide to
evaluate the proposed revision of the shopping center to accommodate the Cub grocery store.
Code Performance Standard Cub Proposal
Plan By Neighborhood requirements Complies
Drive through and outdoor sales restrictions Complies - Uses not proposed
Shopping cart storage Complies
Proof of parking Complies
Parking reduction Not applicable
Loading and trash area screening Does not comply
Exterior building materials Complies
Architectural standards Partial compliance
Rooftop screening Complies
Pedestrian connections Does not comply
Public Plaza Does not comply
• Does the Cub Foods project meet the general conditions for amending the approved
special use permit?
The St. Louis Park zoning code allows property covered by a Special Use Permit to be expanded,
altered or modified subject to all of the following:
1. The expansion, alteration or modification shall comply in all respects with applicable
provisions of the ordinance, and shall not increase or intensify any existing non-conformities.
39
2. Any non-conformities existing on the site shall be brought into greater or complete
compliance with other provisions of the ordinance.
The proposal is also reviewed with regard to its potential effect on the health, safety, and welfare
of occupants of surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, parking facilities
on adjacent streets, values of property in the surrounding area, and the objectives of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Findings: The existing property meets the general requirements of the special use permits and
would not create additional non-conformities assuming the screen wall height is increased. The
proposal is in conformance with the Comprehensive Plan designation for the site.
• Have the traffic and circulation issues been adequately addressed?
Traffic: The grocery store use is an increase in activity compared to the former Ward’s
department store. The applicant submitted a traffic study (see attachment) which analyzed the
impact of the change of use upon adjacent streets and intersections during the afternoon peak
rush hour. The study showed that certain turning movements in and out of the shopping center
would be increased enough to cause capacity problems. The study pointed out three areas of
concern and recommends the following traffic lane modifications to improve traffic flow:
1. Allow left turn movements from the through lane of Texas Ave. onto TH 7 and expand
the free right turn from southbound Texas Ave. onto TH 7 to allow stacking space for the
left/through lane (a sketch of the improvements is included in the traffic study). This
modification will increase the left turn movement capacity, will help alleviate vehicle stacking
problems from affecting the Knollwood movements to and from Texas Ave. and will improve
safety and visibility. The widening would extend from the TCF driveway south approximately
125 feet to the edge of the TH 7 intersection.
2. Restripe the Knollwood access at Texas Ave. to clearly show one west bound (in) lane
and separate left and right turn outbound lanes (this revision has been made on the plans).
3. Expand the Knollwood access at 36th Street to allow show one southbound (in) lane
and separate left and right turn outbound lanes (this revision has been made on the plans).
The applicant has agreed to make these improvements as part of the project.
Circulation: Staff was concerned that the proposed right-turn-only parking lot access off of the
Texas Avenue driveway would create a unsafe and hazardous condition because it was too close
to Texas Avenue. At staff’s recommendation, the applicant revised the plan to show a minimum
of 80 feet of stacking distance.
The applicant also revised the plans to show the minimum 25 foot drive aisle width in the
parking lot as required by City Code.
40
• Are the screening and landscape buffering adequate to protect the nearby residential
areas from the impacts of the retail grocery and 24 hour operation?
The major change to the building is the location of the truck loading docks and trash compactor
area along the north side of the building. This area fronts on West 36th Street and is across from
a residential neighborhood. During operations, the truck loading and trash compactor area will
generate more noise than the previous department store use. The 24 hour per day grocery store
will create additional night time activity. In order to keep the truck and compactor noise to a
minimum, screening and landscaping must be provided and loading and trash compactor
operation should be kept to a minimum during nighttime and early morning hours (between
10:00 PM and 7:00 AM).
City Code requires new development to locate noise producing portions, such as loading docks,
away from adjacent residential areas. Since this is a renovation of an existing shopping center,
the Zoning Administrator has determined that it is not required to meet that provision. However,
a type “F” Bufferyard and screening that is a minimum of 10 feet high when installed is required.
The original proposal did not meet either of these requirements. The current C-2 shopping center
ordinance performance standards (not applicable to the renovation project) would also require a
screen wall between the loading docks and the street. Staff suggested that the applicant consider
a screen wall, since there is little room to provide adequate landscape buffering. The applicant
revised the plans to include an eight feet tall screen wall. Staff is recommending increasing the
height of the screen wall to ten feet to meet the intent of the Code. Staff is also recommending
that the applicant provide details of the screen wall, so that staff can ensure it is of high quality
and architecturally compatible with the building.
Recommendation:
Staff and the Planning Commission recommend approving the amended special use permit
subject to the following conditions (conditions that have been met by the revised plans have been
eliminated):
1) The applicant shall engineer and pay for the construction of the turn lane modifications to
Texas Avenue (right and through/left turn lanes) and the driveway access modifications at Texas
and West 36th Street as described in the Benshoof & Associates project traffic report dated
October 8, 1997. The Texas/TH 7 lane and driveway modifications are to be submitted for
approval of the City Engineer and Minnesota Department of Transportation. If the remaining
boulevard width is less than three feet, decorative pavers shall be used in the boulevard rather
than plantings.
2) The applicant shall submit a revised site plan and detailed elevations showing a 10 feet high
screen wall north of the proposed loading and trash compactor area. The design of the screen
wall shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to issuance of building permits.
3) The applicant shall submit a sign plan for the approval of the Zoning Administrator. All signs
are to meet City Code requirements.
41
4) Exterior building materials and roof top screening shall blend with the existing shopping
center and meet the City Code requirements.
5) If parking problems occur, or when directed by the Zoning Administrator, the applicant shall
implement the proof of parking plan.
6) All food service facilities shall be as approved by the Inspections Department.
7) No outdoor sales or storage is allowed (other than temporary sales in accordance with Code
provisions).
8) Fire lanes and connections shall be as approved by the Fire Marshal.
Attachments (on file in the City Clerk’s office):
• Proposed Resolution
• Traffic Study
• Plans and Elevations
Submitted by: Janet Jeremiah, Planning Manager, 924-2573
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
42
Item #7a
MEMORANDUM
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
THROUGH: Charlie Meyer, City Manager
FROM: Tom Harmening, Community Development Director
DATE: July 1, 1998
SUBJECT: Presentation on Wolfe Park Improvements
During the June 15th Council meeting staff intended to provide the Council with a brief
presentation on all of the proposed improvements to be made to Wolfe Park, and a status report
on these improvements. However, due to some technical difficulty, staff was unable to
accomplish this task. For the July 6 Council meeting, staff, with the help of Bruce Cornwall, the
City's architect, will provide the Council with this presentation.
43
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #8a
Meeting of July 6, 1998
8a. Approval of a 1998 Labor Agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and
Law enforcement Labor Services (LELS) Local #218 covering Police
Sergeants.
Police supervisors are in agreement with a one year contract for 1998.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution approving the labor
Agreement for 1998 for Police Sergeants, LELS #218
Background:
The Police Supervisors’ past contract from 1996/1997 expired December 31, 1997. Previously,
the contract covered positions of Sergeants, Lieutenants and Captain. Through recent
negotiations, the union agreed to remove the positions of both Captain and Lieutenant from the
Agreement being presented to you for your consideration. The positions of Lieutenant (2) are
currently vacant, and the position of Captain is filled. Negotiations were lengthy due to the
discussions regarding the Captain and Lieutenant positions . We were scheduled to go to
mediation, but reached a tentative agreement prior to the scheduled mediation date.
Summary of Contract Changes
1. Article I effective date January 1, 1998
2. 2.1 removal of Captain and Lieutenant
3. 3.8 removal of Captain and Lieutenant
4. 9.1 removal of Captain and Lieutenant
5. 12.2 new rates effective 1/1/98 for health insurance, increase limited
to an additional $10 per month for dependent coverage as
compared to 1997 rates.
6. 12.3 removed (1997 insurance language)
7. 13.2 removed old language (1996 and 1997 uniform amounts)
8. 25.1 new rates effective 1/1/98 based on 2.8% increase,
removal of Captain and Lieutenant (these positions will
be incorporated into the non-union compensation plan
retroactive to 1/1/98.)
9. 25.2 new language, adding $200 annual community policing supplement
to be administered by the Chief of Police.
10. 25.3 new language, allowing reimbursement of post license fee
(consistent with Police Officer Contract.)
44
11. 26.1 modified language regarding scheduled hours
12. 26.3 remove language regarding availability pay
13. Article XXVII duration 1/1/98 - 12/31/98
Wages
Increase 2.8%. This increase is consistent with settlements for St. Louis Park employees, both
union and non-union for 1998.
Insurance
Increase in health insurance was limited to an additional $10 toward dependent coverage. This
allows for insurance contributions of $385/month for single and $450/month for dependent
coverage in 1998. These rates are lower than non-union supervisors who are part of the cafeteria
plan at $410/month for single and $475/month for dependent without long-term disability.
Recommendations:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution approving a Labor
Agreement between the City and LELS #218 establishing terms and conditions of employment
for 1998.
Attachments: Resolution
LELS #218 Labor Agreement for 1998 (on file in the Clerk’s Office)
Prepared by: Nancy Gohman, Human Resources Manager
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
45
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AND LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES
LOCAL #218 FOR 1998
WHEREAS, the City and the Union have reached a negotiated settlement covering the terms and
conditions of a Labor Agreement as permitted by the State of Minnesota Public Employees Labor
Relations Act, and
WHEREAS, the City Council may enter into such agreements as authorized by its Charter; now
therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the Mayor and City
Manager are authorized to execute a Collective Bargaining Agreement, City Contract # dated
July 6, 1998 between the City of St. Louis Park and Law Enforcement Labor Services Local #218
effective January 1, 1998 - December 31, 1998.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
46
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #8b
Meeting of July 6, 1998
8b. CDBG Third Party Agreement Perspectives, Inc.
This report proposes entering into a CDBG Third Party Agreement with
Perspectives, Inc. related to approved activities under the CDBG-funded Multi-
Family Neighborhood Revitalization program.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City
Manager to execute a Third Party Agreement with Perspectives,
Inc.
Background:
The City receives about $290,000 in federal CDBG funds yearly through Hennepin County. The
two proposed activities approved by the City Council for 1997 CDBG funding were Single
Family Rehabilitation ($200,440) and Multifamily Neighborhood Revitalization ($85,903).
The City received three applications for funding under the Multifamily Neighborhood
Revitalization Program from nonprofit agencies proposing to make improvements to common
space and to provide services to support community cohesion. On September 8, 1997, the City
Council reviewed these proposals.
In September, an award of $3,000 was made by the City Council to Wayside House to build a
playground on their property at 1341/1349 Jersey Avenue for used by residents of those
buildings. This playground is currently being designed and will be constructed during the
summer of 1998. An award of $40,000 to the Meadowbrook Collaborative for creation of a
community center, was relinquished by the Meadowbrook Collaborative when other private
funding was accessed. These funds are being added to the funds available in the City’s 1998
Multifamily Neighborhood Revitalization Program.
Over the last several months, the Council has considered a proposal submitted by Perspectives,
Inc., for CDBG funding to install sidewalks and streetlighting on Louisiana Court. Perspectives
is a nonprofit provider of transitional housing and support services to women in recovery from
substance use disorders and their children. They own three buildings in Louisiana Court.
Perspectives applied for $75,903 in Community Development Block Grant funds to put in a
sidewalk along the length of Louisiana Court, two streetlights and an entrance sign to the
neighborhood. They also applied for $10,000 to help fund a neighborhood coordinator position
to provide community support services to all residents of Louisiana Court, the 13 buildings of
which are owned by 7 different private landlords, including Perspectives.
47
In May, the Council approved a public works project installing lighting and sidewalks on
Louisiana Court, and earlier this month, Council approved an assessment for these improvements
that will be offset with a contribution of $32,903 in 1997 CDBG funds.
In addition, the City Council previously indicated its support for providing Perspectives, Inc.
with the $10,000 in public service funds available in the 1997 Multifamily Neighborhood
Revitalization Program to support its Neighborhood Involvement Program in the Louisiana Court
neighborhood.
The entrance sign is not being included in the activities to be funded with this $42,903, because
issues of design and location on private property have not been resolved. The entrance sign is
being considered as a possible activity in two ongoing discussions -- the current Louisiana Court
Visioning Task Force and the negotiations among property owners regarding property
maintenance and management standards.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared By: Joanna Brownstein, Housing Coordinator
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
48
RESOLUTION NO. _____
RESOLUTION APPROVING A 1997 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM THIRD PARTY AGREEMENT
(CDBG YEAR XXIII) BETWEEN PERSPECTIVES, INC. AND THE CITY OF ST.
LOUIS PARK, RELATING TO THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK'S MULTIFAMILY
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, through execution of a Joint Cooperation
Agreement with Hennepin County, is cooperating in the Urban Hennepin County Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park developed a proposal for the use of Hennepin
County CDBG funds made available to it. A public hearing was held on March 3, 1997 to obtain
views of citizens on local and urban Hennepin County housing and community development
needs and priorities for the City's proposed use of $286,343.00 from the 1997 Urban Hennepin
County Community Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, the City Council designated that $85,903 be set aside for rehabilitation or
public improvements to multifamily apartment communities, $10,000 of which were proposed to
be used to allow a public service agency to provide services to enhance the social environment of
these multifamily communities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council solicited proposals from apartment owners and public service
agencies to provide said improvements and services;
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park received and considered proposals from Wayside
House, Inc., Meadowbrook Collaborative and Perspectives, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has allocated $32,903 in 1997 Urban hennepin County
Community Development Block Grant Program funds to offset the assessment imposed on
property owners to install sidewalks and streetlighting on Louisiana Court;
49
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park authorizes the
Mayor and City Manager to execute a 1997 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG Year
XXIII) Third Party Agreement with Perspectives, Inc. for services to be provided by the agency,
as identified in their application. Perspectives, Inc. is awarded $10,000 to support its
Neighborhood Involvement Program in the Lousiana Court neighborhood.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
50
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #8c
Meeting of July 6, 1998
8c. Second Reading of Ordinance to Amend Section 9-113, Restrictions on Water
Use.
This report considers an ordinance that provides for emergency controls on water
use in case of an emergency water shortage.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to waive the second reading, adopt the ordinance
amendment relating to water restrictions, and approve the
summary of the ordinance for publication.
Background:
On April 20, 1998, Council adopted a Water Contingency and Conservation Plan. A portion of
the plan addressed emergency measures in case of a water shortage. Specifically, the plan
describes five levels of water shortage in terms of supply capacity (how much water we are
pumping and treating) and storage capacity ( how much water is in our reservoirs). These levels
are based on historical data for summer and winter months. It also outlines an appropriate
community response for each level of water shortage emergency. The plan calls for ordinance
revisions to formalize the emergency water shortage response as well as to provide for its
enforcement.
On June 2, 1998, staff brought a proposed ordinance to Council. A public hearing was set for
June 15 and advertised in the June 3 Sun-Sailor. On June 15, 1998, a public hearing was held.
There were no comments from the public and we have received no comments since the hearing.
Discussion:
The proposed ordinance formalizes the five community responses and trigger levels from the
Water Contingency and Conservation Plan. It creates a system that automatically addresses a
water shortage or emergency with appropriate community responses, and it clarifies an
enforcement mechanism. In times of emergency, Council and staff can rely on the system, which
is based upon historical data and experience, instead of attempting to quickly identify an
emergency and formulate a short-notice response. If adopted, the ordinance will be published in
summary form July 15, 1998, and would take effect on July 30, 1998.
Attachments:
proposed amendments to Section 9-113, City Code of Ordinances and ordinance summary
Prepared by: Mike Roth, Administrative Assistant
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
N:\group\pw\mike\util\ccwtr_sr.doc
51
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION
9-113, TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO WATER SHORTAGES.
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Sec. 1. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 9-113, is amended to read as follows:
Section 9-113. Restrictions on Water Use. To Avoid a water shortage due to a water supply
or storage capacity problem in the water system, the City may impose restrictions on the use
of water for lawn sprinkling and irrigation. Restrictions may be imposed by the City Council
by resolution or by the City Manager. Action by the City Manager shall be upon a written
certification finding that there is a reduction of water supply or storage capacity in the City
water system which is an immediate threat to the ability of the system to meet demands upon
it by users. The response steps as established in the Water Contingency and Conservation
Plan shall be imposed by the City Manager when trigger levels are met. The storage
capacity trigger levels occur when levels cannot be maintained over a period of 1 to 3 days.
Community Response Steps
Response Step 1 A voluntary conservation request is issued by the City Manager.
Customers are asked to limit outdoor watering between noon and
6:00 p.m.. Customers with odd-numbered street addresses
alternate outdoor watering with even-numbered addresses. All
municipal operations are placed on mandatory conservation with
park irrigation limited as defined by the directors of parks and
public works.
Response Step 2 A mandatory water conservation decree is issued by the City
Manager. Outdoor watering is limited for customers as described
in Response Step 1.
Response Step 3 A mandatory water conservation decree is issued, liming outdoor
watering by customers to once every five days. Watering of trees
will be allowed on an even-odd address basis. No watering
between noon and 6:00 p.m. No private car washing will be
allowed. Special water users, as designated by the City Manager,
may be allowed a supplemental water allowance in order to
maintain operations.
52
Response Step 4 A mandatory water conservation decree is issued, banning all
lawn watering. Major industrial/commercial users over 10,000
gallons/day may be restricted at the discretion of the City
Manager.
Response Step 5 A mandatory water conservation decree is issued, placing weekly
limits on water use by all customers. Limits shall be set at the
discretion of the City Manager, based on available supply system
capacity , priority of users, and other pertinent considerations
(i.e., nursing homes, hospitals, child care centers and schools).
Community Response Trigger Levels
Supply System
Condition
Water Supply
Capacity
Storage
Capacity at
6:00 a.m.
Community Response
Step
Water Shortage
Possibility
<12.5 MGD
(summer)
<10 MGD
(winter)
7 million
gallons (mg)
1
Water Shortage Watch <11.5 MGD
(summer)
<9 MGD (winter)
6 mg 2
Water Shortage
Emergency- Level 1
<10.5 MGD
(summer)
<8 MGD (winter)
5 mg 3
Water Shortage
Emergency- Level 2
<9.5 MGD
(summer)
<7 MGD (winter)
4 mg 4
Water Shortage
Emergency- Level 3
<8.5 MGD
(summer)
<6 MGD (winter)
3 mg 5
MGD=million gallons per day
The certification shall be come effective upon 24 hours of filing of a copy with the City
Clerk who shall endorse on each filing the time and date of filing. The City Manager shall
take such action as is reasonably practicable to inform the general public of the imposition of
restrictions on water use. Failure to comply with restrictions imposed pursuant to this
section will result in a $25 noncompliance charge which will be added to the water bill of
the property. Failure to comply with the restrictions imposed after two documented
violations is grounds for discontinuance of water service.
53
Sec. 2: EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective 15 days after
publication.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council June 15, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Manager City Attorney
54
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO. ___________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION
9-113, TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO WATER SHORTAGES.
Summary: This ordinance defines five levels of water emergency in terms of the City’s water
system production capacity and storage level, sets appropriate responses for each level, and
provide for their enforcement. Community response steps begin with voluntary conservation
measures and gradually progress to more stringent mandatory conservation measures. The
penalty for violating this ordinance is clarified to $25 per occurrence.
Effective Date: This ordinance shall take effect on July 30, 1998.
Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998.
________________________
Mayor
(The full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.)
55
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #8d*
Meeting of July 6, 1998
8d*. Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. 16-98 with Hardrives, Inc. W. 35th Street
- Raleigh Avenue to cul-de-sac east of Highway 100 - Project No. 16-98.
This report considers the removal of the existing high street crown, grading,
compacting and installing new 2” thick bituminous base.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing execution of
Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $20,748.00 to Contract No.
16-98 with Hardrives, Inc., increasing the total contract amount
from $143,011.00 to $163,759.00.
Background: At its April 20, 1998 meeting the City Council authorized execution of a contract
with Hardrives, Inc. for construction of storm sewer, curb and gutter, pavement mill and overlay
on W. 35th Street/Raleigh Avenue to cul-de-sac east of Highway 100.
Discussion: This project consists of milling and replacement of 2 inches of the bituminous
surface (1/2 of the pavement), random curb and gutter and driveway pavement removal and
replacement, and catch basin/manhole repair and adjustments. The construction costs, as bid,
were expected to be pavement - $25,000, curb and gutter - $15,000, and catch basins - $5,000 for
a total construction cost of $45,000.
On Friday, June 19, 1998 during the milling operation, the remaining pavement and base was
found to be non-uniform and inadequate to resurface without complete removal and replacement.
Since then staff and the contractor have evaluated the situation and determined the specific work
necessary to correct the situation. The attached Change Order describes that work. In summary
it consists of removal of the remaining bituminous pavement and some gravel base, reshaping
and compacting of the gravel base, and construction of 2 inches of new bituminous base. This
extra work is expected to cost about $20,748.00.
Common excavation - $ 5,850.00
Subgrade preparation - $ 1,500.00
Base Course - $13,398.00
It is staff’s recommendation that Change Order No. 1 be approved and that Contract No. 16-98
with Hardrives, Inc. be increased by $20,748.00.
Attachments: Change Order No. 1
Resolution
Prepared by: Mike Rardin, Director of Public Works
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
56
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
CONTRACT NO. 16-98
WHEREAS, the City Council entered into Contract No. 16-98 with Hardrives, Inc. for
storm sewer, curb and gutter, pavement mill and overlay - Project No. 97-01;
WHEREAS, the City has determined that certain modifications be made to the scope of
services in the contract to facilitate the construction of the project; and
WHEREAS, the contractor, Hardrives, inc. has agreed to the costs for the additional
services;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of
St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that Change Order No. 1, in the amount of $20,748.00 to Contract No.
16-98 with Hardrives, Inc. for removal of the existing street crown, grading, compacting and
constructing new 2” thick bituminous base related to the W. 35th Street (Raleigh Avenue to cul-
de-sac east of Highway 100) project, is hereby approved.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
57
Contract No.: 16-98
Change Order No.: One (1) Date: June 22, 1998
Project Name: Project 97-01 Mill & Overlay Curb & Gutter Repair
Project Location: West 35th Street - Raleigh Ave. to cul-de-sac east of Highway 100
Contractor: Hardrives, Inc. 14475 Quiram Drive
Rogers, MN Phone No. (612) 428-8886
Type of Work: Bituminous Pavement Mill & Overlay including curb & gutter repair
Amount of Original Contract: $143,011.00
Description of Work to be Added or Deleted:
Removal of the existing high street crown, grading, compacting and install new 2” thick
bituminous base.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Unit Contract As Revised by C.O.
Contract Item Unit Price Quantity Amount Quantity Amount
2105.501 Common Excavation C.Y. $19.50 - -300 $5,850.00
0112.603 Subgrade Preparation Rd. Sta. $150.00 - -10 $1,500.00
2340.514 Type 31 Base Course Ton $30.80 - -435 $13,398.00
________________________________________________________________________________________
Total Amount: $20,748.00
Funds Encumbered to date from Contract 16-98: Change Order #1 $20,748.00
Difference between Contract Amount and C.O. Amount (Add): $143,011.00
Total Funds Encumbered per this Change Order: $163,759.00
Above additional work to be performed under same conditions as specified in original
contract unless otherwise stipulated herein.
Approved:
Project Inspector Date Supt. of Engineering Date
_______________________________
Director of Public Works Date City Manager Date
We hereby agree to furnish labor and materials complete in accordance with the contract
specifications at the above stated price.
Approved: __________________________________ ________________________________
Date Authorized Contract Signature
NOTE: This Revision becomes part of and in conformance with the existing contract.
58
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #8e
Meeting of July 6, 1998
8e. Resolution authorizing Metropolitan Council Livable Communities Grant
Application.
The Council is requested to adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to
apply to the Metropolitan Council for a Livable Communities Demonstration
Account Grant to help offset construction costs for redeveloping the first block in
the Park Commons Phase One area (north of Excelsior Boulevard and west of
Ottawa Avenue).
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing application for the
Livable Communities Demonstration Program requesting
funding for Park Commons Redevelopment Phase One, Block 1.
Background: The Livable Communities Demonstration Account of the Metropolitan Livable
Communities Fund is available to facilitate construction of demonstration projects that do one or
more of the following:
• Provide access to a variety of transportation systems: transit, bicycles, pedestrian, auto;
• Link affordable housing with employment growth;
• Intensify new and existing land use;
• Provide mixed-income housing;
• Encourage public infrastructure that:
- connects urban and suburban communities,
- attracts private sector investment, or
- provides employment opportunities to residents.
Staff believes the redevelopment concept for the Park Commons Phase One, Block 1 area (on the
north side of Excelsior Boulevard, west of Ottawa Avenue and east of Bally’s Swim & Fitness),
achieves the goals of the Livable Communities program.
The overall Park Commons redevelopment concept was originally developed as part of a
community design charrette held in October, 1996. The design charrette considered the future of
a 125-acre area in the northeast quadrant of Highway 100 and Excelsior Boulevard. The area had
been identified in “Vision St. Louis Park” as a future “town center” for the community. The
initial concept plan for redeveloping the area included a phasing plan that was to be tested by a
market study. The market study and more detailed design work have now been completed and
provide support for moving forward with a Phase One project as early as the Spring of 1999.
The City Council considered the market study results and detailed Phase One redevelopment
plans during a workshop in December, 1997. In June, 1998, the Council initiated the appropriate
Comprehensive Plan and zoning amendments to help facilitate the redevelopment. The Council
59
also directed staff to issue Request for Qualifications to begin the process of selecting a
developer to work with the City in implementing redevelopment in the Block 1 area.
Construction in the Phase One, Block 1 area is anticipated to begin in the Spring of 1999.
On May 15, 1998, staff submitted a Project Summary Form (see attached) to the Metropolitan
Council for review and comment. On June 15, 1998, staff received feedback from the UofM
Design Center and Metropolitan Council staff (see attachment) to help in preparing a full grant
application. The grant application is due on July 22, 1998. Grant applications must include a
resolution of support from the local unit of government in which the project is located.
Staff is proposing applying for a $2 million grant to help offset costs of constructing public realm
improvements to leverage private reinvestment in the area. A total of $4.1 million dollars may
be distributed during the 1998 funding cycle. Metropolitan Council action on the awards is
expected on November 12, 1998.
Attachments:
• Proposed resolution
• Project Summary Form
• Comments on the Project Summary
Prepared by: Janet Jeremiah, Planning Manager, 924-2573
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
60
RESOLUTION NO.____________
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR THE
LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota is a participant in the Livable
Communities Act’s Housing Incentives Program for 1998 as determined by the Metropolitan
Council, and is therefore eligible to make application for funds under the Livable Communities
Demonstration Account; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified a proposed project within the City that meets the
Demonstration Account’s purposes and criteria; and
WHEREAS, the City has the institutional, managerial and financial capability to ensure
adequate project administration; and
WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as
stated in the contract agreements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota agrees to act as legal sponsor for
the project contained in the Demonstration Account application submitted on July 22, 1998.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager is hereby authorized to apply to the
Metropolitan Council for this funding on behalf of the City of St. Louis Park and to execute such
agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 1998
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
61
Livable Communities Demonstration Account
PROJECT SUMMARY FORM (1998)
1. Project Name: Park Commons Redevelopment
Phase One, Block 1
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
2. Project Location: North of Excelsior Boulevard, West of Ottawa Avenue
See Attached Location and Site Maps.
3. Background: The project is the first block of redevelopment in the Park Commons
Redevelopment Area (See Attachment 1 - Site Location Map). The overall redevelopment area
is in the northeast quadrant of Highway 100 and Excelsior Boulevard. The area was identified as
St. Louis Park’s future “town center” through a 1994 grass roots visioning process. A
community design charrette, involving over 200 citizens and a team of professionals, was held in
October, 1996 to develop a concept plan for redevelopment of the entire 125 acre area. The
concept plan (see Attachment 2) was adopted by the City Council in 1997 subject to the outcome
of several feasibility studies and more detailed design work. The studies are now complete, and
the concept plan for the Phase One area has been refined based upon market, demographic,
traffic, and environmental/geotechnical conditions. The proposed Town Green connection to
Wolfe Park is the focal point of the Phase One area (see Attachment 3). Therefore, the Town
Green would be constructed as part of the first block of redevelopment. The proposed Phase
One, Block 1 project (see Attachment 4) is anticipated to begin construction in 1999 and to act as
a catalyst for additional redevelopment in the Park Commons Phase One area.
4. Project Description: The Phase One, Block 1 redevelopment project involves acquisition of
existing commercial properties, removal of existing one-story buildings with surface parking, and
construction of the following: new multi-story buildings with structured parking; the Town
Green; two new public streets; and substantial transit, pedestrian, and bicycle amenities.
Approximately 186,000 square feet of new space will be constructed in three-story buildings
fronting on public street sidewalks. Existing restaurants and “Ma and Pa” service businesses will
be relocated from one-story buildings with surface parking into the ground floor of new mixed-
use buildings with primarily structured parking. Some new retail/service businesses will also be
included on the ground floor. Offices will occupy upper floors overlooking Excelsior Boulevard,
while mixed income apartments will occupy upper floors overlooking the Town Green and
38/39th Street (a quieter street just north and parallel to Excelsior Boulevard). Some live/work
units and Hollman units may also be included in the development. Future phases will include for
sale townhomes. Public realm investments to leverage private investment include substantial
improvements to nearby Wolfe Park (including a new amphitheater, aquatic park, and multi-use
paths), acquisition and development of the Town Green, construction of new public streets with
on-street parking, construction of shared parking structures, transit amenities in the town green
area, and substantial pedestrian/bicycle streetscape improvements. LCDA funding is requested
to help offset construction costs related to public realm improvements that are deemed critical to
leverage private investment and ensure the success of the project.
62
5. Special Features:
• Intensified land use with primarily structured parking (small surface lots behind
buildings and on-street parking will also be provided).
• Multi-story buildings with ground floor restaurants/retail/service, and upper floor
offices and mixed-income apartments (including potential “Hollman units” and live-
work units).
• Substantial investment in public realm amenities including new Town Green,
pedestrian/bicycle amenities (including connections to the Wolfe Park amphitheater
and aquatic park), and substantial streetscape improvements.
• Transit amenities to enhance use of existing Metro Transit service and future transit
circulator (to link affordable housing with employment growth and services).
• Public/private partnership to ensure implementation of high quality development with
shared parking and sensitive phasing (the goal is to accommodate appropriate local
“Ma & Pa businesses” in new mixed-use buildings with minimal disruption).
6. Status of Proposal: Predevelopment activities (including a community design charrette,
market study, and environmental/geotechnical analyses) are complete. The City received a
$139,000 LCDA grant in 1996 to help offset some of those predevelopment costs for the entire
Park Commons redevelopment area. The City also received $102,181 from the Tax Base
Revitalization fund to help pay for demolition of a building in the Phase One area that included
asbestos and other hazardous materials. The City has already invested substantial Tax Increment
Financing in the redevelopment area toward acquisition of properties, environmental
remediation, streetscape improvements, and improvements to Wolfe Park and the Recreation
Center. The City will continue to use Tax Increment Financing to help provide public amenities
and leverage private reinvestment according to appropriate design principles. The City is
requesting $2 million in LCDA funding to help offset construction costs in the Block 1 area
related to public realm improvements such as the Town Green, transit and pedestrian/bicycle
improvements, and structured parking that will be open to the public and available for shared
use. The public funding is anticipated to leverage approximately $25 million of private
investment in the Block 1 area and to act as a catalyst for additional investment in the Park
Commons area.
7. Contact Person:
Janet Jeremiah, AICP, Project Manager
City of St. Louis Park Community Development Department
5005 Minnetonka Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Phone: 924-2573; FAX: 924-2663
63
LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT (LCDA)
Comments on the Project Summary for St. Louis Park, Park Improvements
June 8, 1998
DESIGN CENTER COMMENTS
This is a strong model for the process of revitalizing aging strip commercial are in 1st ring cities.
The town square is a direct tool or catalyst for more intensive commercial, residential and
cultural activity, and harder to fund than parks and open space. Your application should make a
point of this, pulling out these distinctions. What will the private sector pay or be required to do
if they receive the benefits of the town green?
What development agreements and development standards are or will be in place to leverage a $2
million investment?
COUNCIL STAFF COMMENTS
This is an important proposal for setting the development pattern of Town Center, and can set in
place a good model of a type that is rare in the Twin Cities. It would be helpful to stress in the
application that the town green will add value to the properties near it, attracting private
investment to the area. Information about development agreements and development standards
in place or in process will be important to the evaluation.
The Commons Redevelopment has real potential to improve transit ridership. Transportation
staff supports the improved bus stop on Excelsior Blvd. At the Town Green location, and
recommends that bus pulloffs be designed so that buses can pull away quickly and safely without
getting stuck waiting for traffic on Excelsior Boulevard.
64
Item 9a*
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 20, 1998 --7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Paul Carver, Michael Garelick, Ken Gothberg, Dennis Morris
Michelle Bissonnette arrived at 7:20 p.m.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Deb Bohn, Sally Velick
STAFF PRESENT: Judie Erickson, Janice Loftus
1. Call to Order - Roll Call
Chair Morris called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m.
2. Mr. Gothberg moved approval of Joint Planning Commission and Park & Recreation
Commission Minutes of April 15, 1998; and regular Planning Commission Minutes of
May 6, 1998. Mr. Garelick seconded the motion and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0
with Carver, Garelick, Gothberg and Morris voting in favor.
3. Public Hearings - None
4. Old Business - None
5. New Business:
A. Consent Agenda: None
B. Other New Business:
Bi. Case No. 98-14-VAC - - Request of Park Industrial Properties (John Standal) to
vacate a portion of Louisiana Avenue (formerly Hurst Street) south of Louisiana
Circle.
Judie Erickson presented staff report and recommended approval subject to
retaining easements as stated in staff report.
Ken Gothberg raised a concern that City would need this property for a future
parking lot if trail plan was adopted.
Chair Morris asked staff to clarify the petitioners need for parking and possible
use of property for expansion.
Judie Erickson stated that no expansion was planned. Presently, the condition of
the property is poor in that the parking lot is not paved. The petitioner desires to
65
pave the entire lot for parking including the subject right of way leaving a curb cut
for access to the creek.
Chair Morris asked staff to clarify the statement that a legal setback required for
the building was not a zoning issue. Judie Erickson stated that the legal setback
was the reason stated for vacation of property and the applicant does not want to
enter into an agreement with the City for private use of public property.
Paul Carver asked what the use of building was. Ms. Erickson stated that the
property was zoned industrial and the building has multi-tenants.
Paul Carver asked if parking improvements could be used by creek users, what the
trade-offs were for the City granting permission for improvements versus vacating
the current right of way. He also asked what the tax implications would be if the
right of way was let go and the property reverted back to the petitioners.
Judie Erickson stated that shared parking was possible and the vacation would
increase property values.
Ken Gothberg asked if any specific design plans of the parking lot had been
developed. Judie Erickson stated no plans have been received.
Chair Morris said he believes that there is a fundamental problem with vacating a
public right of way and then make a request of petitioner to use the property as a
public right of way from the street.
Chair Morris stated that there was still a public need for the street right of way for
utility purposes, and access to Minnehaha Creek for recreational and bridge
maintenance purposes.
Ms. Bissonnette arrived.
Paul Carver concurred with Chair Morris that accomplishing what was being
desired in the proposed manner was curious and stated there may be alternative
proposals to achieve the same end without vacating the right of way and he
recommends further investigation. He is concerned that it is not clear what the
petitioner’s concern is regarding a setback for the building.
Chair Morris recommended that if the Planning Commission recommends denial
of the petition and if the City Council agrees, that, in light of the fact that the
petitioner paid a fee for the petition vacation, that this fee could be used if there
was an additional fee applicable for the private use of public land application.
Mr. Garelick moved to deny the application and consider other alternatives. Mr.
Gothberg seconded the motion and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0-1 with
Bissonnette, Garelick, Gothberg and Morris voting in favor and Carver
abstaining.
66
Bii. Review of Comprehensive Plan Chapters
Consensus of Commissioners that no formal presentation is necessary. Comments
listed below:
Public Health and Safety Chapter
Crime Prevention
• Continue general patrolling and response to 911 and nonemergency calls
• Add community policing and education
• Question on need for criminal statistics by neighborhood
Children First
Judie Erickson described program. Makes needs of children first and builds assets.
The program received much recognition.
Drug Prevention
• Statement on effect on community vague- need more emphasis on how it
affects community- what efforts City is taking
• Incorrect assumptions statement leaves issue open to debate - do not
address
• Incorrect assumptions are real issues - address what we are doing
• Should not say crime is a social problem - should address what we are
doing
• “Crime Alone” does not cause neighborhoods to deteriorate.
Emergencies
• Define make up of police and fire in more detail
Fire Sprinkling
• Not clear if building prior to regulation needs to retrofit (not required to
retrofit)
• Mix of multi-family and nursing homes do not have sprinkler systems
• Makes sense to strongly encourage in existing buildings - is an insurance
benefit
67
Aging Facilities
• Question on use of one facility at Walker/Louisiana -- is centrally located
to access all directions
• Existing facilities older
• Facility at Louisiana and Cedar Lake Road has access problems
• New station could be built to new standards
• One station would need to be large
• Need to educate public on small emergency lights on semaphores
Medical Emergencies
• 65% of emergency calls are medical calls
• All fire staff trained for medical emergencies
Environmental Health Issues
• Radon tests ruled out because of inaccuracy
• Sellers usually state unknown for Radon in disclosure statements
• Inspectors need more awareness about Radon
• Appropriate to address because radon is there
• Does city license and inspect private swimming pools? -- reword to say
pools used by public
Food Borne Hazards
• Discussion on wording and reference to people
• Page 12, 2nd paragraph, reference to immigrants misleading
• Concern is about communication in restaurants where employees do not
speak English
• Focus on education of hygiene
• Leave reference to people out of it, Page 17, #46 reward language
Water Supply Chapter
• Is there a City plan for connecting to Minneapolis water supply? Staff will
check
• Alternative Water Sources (K3) last line references AV and Minneapolis
• Valves do exist but are turned off
• Chapter is an executive summary of a large document
• Need statement to stress quality of water - how compares to bottled water
• Map to show location of wells and aquifers
• Where do we go to improve system
• Plan is a policy document for City, not a promotional book
68
Communications Chapter
Undergrounding of Utilities
• Where do we look to the future
• Another chapter, Use of Public Land will address undergrounding of all
utilities
• Need to rethink goal to underground by year 2000
• New development requires undergrounding
• Is prioritization a way to go?
Awareness of City Government
• Is there a program to train citizens on how City government functions?
• Staff members volunteer in the schools
• Twin West sponsors a Leadership Program
• St. Louis Park Leadership program sponsored by City and School District
• Are we reaching everyone who has an interest?
• Could use bulletin boards throughout City to get word out
• Video tape of City Government to loan out “How St. Louis Park Works”.
6. Communications
A. Recent City Council Action -- May 18, 1998
City Council approved pedestrian walkway for Sholom Home
B. Other - Thank you note from Sally Velick read.
7. Miscellaneous - None
8. Adjournment
Chair Morris adjourned the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Loftus
Administrative Secretary
Prepared by: Shirley Olson Recording Secretary
1045:GEN81
69
Item 9b*
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 3, 1998 --7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michelle Bissonnette, Deb Bohn, Paul Carver, Ken Gothberg,
Sally Velick, Michael Garelick (arrived at 7:05 p.m.)
MEMBERS ABSENT: Dennis Morris
STAFF PRESENT: Judie Erickson, Janet Jeremiah, Janice Loftus
1. Call to Order - Roll Call
Vice Chair Bissonnette called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes of May 20, 1998
Mr. Carver moved approval of the regular Planning Commission Minutes of May 20,
1998. Ms. Velick seconded the motion and the motion passed on a voteof 4-0-1 with
Bissonnette, Carver, Gothberg and Velick voting in favor and Bohn abstaining.
3. Public Hearing - None
4. Old Business - None
5. New Business:
A. Consent Agenda: None
B. Other New Business:
Bi. Case No. 98-13-ZA -- Request of Lund Real Properties, LLC to amend the
Zoning Ordinance to permit office FAR in excess of .5 in an IG District
under certain conditions.
Janet Jeremiah presented a staff report and recommended adopting a Zoning
Ordinance amendment to allow offices over 50% of the gross floor area to be
permitted with conditions in the “I-G” General Industrial District.
Ken Gothberg asked staff what the current vacancy rate was in office space.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that no vacancy problems exist with office space and because
the market is tight, additional office space is being constructed.
70
Ms. Velick asked if amending this ordinance would set a precedent for additional
businesses.
Ms. Jeremiah indicated that the amendment would provide greater opportunity for
some offices to locate in industrial districts if standards were met.
Roy Lund, Principal of Lund Real Properties and Owner of Data Source Hagen
was present and briefed Commission on the company’s history.
Mr. Carver recommended that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the
“I-G” District to allow offices over 50% of the gross floor area to be permitted
with conditions subject to the conditions recommended in the staff report. Mr.
Gothberg seconded the motion and the motion passed on a vote of 6-0 with
Bissonnette, Bohn, Carver, Garelick, Gothberg and Velick voting in favor.
Bii. Case No. 98-16-CUP -- Request of General Growth Properties, Inc.
(Knollwood Company) for an amendment to a continued Special Permit to
permit a CUB Foods retail store in the vacant 130,000 square foot
Montgomery Ward space at 8332 Highway 7 (Knollwood Mall).
Ms. Jeremiah presented a staff report based on the plan included in the staff
report. She stated that a new plan from CUB was received today that addressed
several issues that she would discuss and indicated that staff did not have
adequate time to review the plans prior to tonight’s meeting. She stated she
would let CUB representatives speak to how the revised plans may have changed.
In conclusion, Ms. Jeremiah recommended that the City Council adopt a
resolution approving the amendment subject to the conditions included in the staff
report.
Bob Shadduck, owner of Jerry Foods in Edina and proposed manager of the CUB
Foods store was present and indicated excitement about the project which would
include a major overhaul of the existing building.
Bill Moston of General Growth Management, Inc., Craig Mevissen, architect with
Plan Mart and SuperValue, and Greg Kopischke of Westwood Engineering were
present.
Bill Moston stated that all concerns listed in staff report have been addressed.
Sally Velick asked what the actual size of the proposed CUB Food store would be
and how the size compared to other existing CUB Foods stores.
Craig Mevissen stated that the new store would be 76,000 square feet and this was
smaller than many other Cub stores, with the exception of Edina’s store which is
66,000 square feet.
71
Ms. Bissonnette commented on the proposed entry to CUB off Texas on the
Southeast side of proposed store.
Mr. Mevissen explained the reason for the relocation of the loading docks to the
north side which included reductions of conflicts between trucks and the main
customer entrance from Texas, and location of perishables on the north side of
store. Mr. Mevissen also discussed parking and screening requirements.
Mr. Carver asked for clarification of the buildings north of 36th street and the
height of the existing wall.
Mr. Mevissen indicated that residential properties were located north of 36th
Street and the existing wall was 8 feet, but installation of a 10 foot masonry wall
was proposed and could be done.
Ms. Velick asked if deliveries would be received 24 hours a day and what the
impact would be on the residential neighborhood.
Mr. Mevissen stated that typical delivery was early A.M, but they do take
deliveries from Super Valu in the evenings. He said they have some control over
those deliveries. The produce deliveries would typically come early in the
morning.
Mr. Carver asked for a definition of night deliveries. He said that he knows that
some of the distributors come very early in the morning (5 or 6 a.m. time frame).
Mr. Mevissen stated that normally the stocking activity is taking place from 10
p.m. to 6 a.m. so they would anticipate that the trucks would probably have a 9-
10:00 p.m. delivery time frame. He said that the trucks would be unloaded right
away and there is is no need to keep the trucks running. He stated that other Cub
Foods in heavy residential areas have not received any complaints and
emphasized their desire to be a good neighbor.
Kay Hayes, 3544 Utah Avenue South, was concerned about people who came by
public transit and got off on Utah and 36th and crossed 36th without a traffic light.
Mr. Moston was not sure how much increased frequency would occur, but if a
pedestrian safety problem developed, it would be addressed.
Ms. Bissonnette asked if any study was used to determine number of persons
using public transit to come to other CUB Food stores.
Bob Shadduck stated he didn’t have any statistics or any formal study to
determine use, but commented on other sites in residential areas and stated that a
walkway was established.
72
Ms. Jeremiah recommended that this issue be discussed with the Public Works
Department and Metro Transit to design pedestrian crossing options for transit
customers to the site.
Ms. Bohn asked if there was any way to predict if the proposed project would
have a positive impact on the viability of Knollwood Mall in comparison with the
addition of another department store.
Mr. Moston believed it would have a positive impact by creating frequent visits
and awareness of the site. He stated that it was the intention of Plan Mart to
review the plans and develop a strategy for the future of Knollwood Mall.
Mr. Garelick asked how the development of CUB Foods would affect Sweet Corn
and More presently on site.
Mr. Moston stated it was their intent to continue to accommodate the business on
the site. Mr. Shadduck stated that, after discussions with other members of the
landlord team about Sweet Corn and More, it was his understanding that the
operation could continue and would not interfere with their use.
Mr. Garelick asked how many employment opportunities would be created.
Mr. Shadduck stated that 250 full and part-time employees would be recruited.
Mr. Garelick asked if the philosophy was that CUB Foods was a stand alone store
or would it be integrated into the mall plans.
Mr. Shadduck stated that this would be the first time a CUB Foods was integrated
into a mall and development of a rear entrance was being designed to make that
feature workable.
Mr. Moston indicated that he had asked that CUB Foods preserve the existing
entry to the Mall and continue the neighborhood type shopping experience.
Mr. Gothberg inquired about plans for office space on the second floor of the
building.
Mr. Moston indicated that CUB was asking for the right to sub lease the second
level, but has no users in place at this time.
Mr. Carver asked if the proposed curb cut entrance off Texas met the
requirements of the City.
Ms. Jeremiah asked Mr. Mevissen to confirm that the staff requirement of 80 feet
was met in the revised site design.
73
Mr. Mevissen described the traffic flow of the new plan and described the
extension of all the drive aisles to 25 feet.
Mr. Garelick inquired about the actual date of opening.
Mr. Mevissen stated that is would take 4 to 5 months to remodel the existing
building and projected completion by early 1999. He commented that MnDOT
had been contacted regarding a potential right turn lane on to Highway 7 and that
the current design philophosy would be used for roof top screening.
Anita Peterson, 3441 Rhode Island Avenue, asked if the entrance to the site from
36th would remain.
Mr. Mevissen stated the entrance to the site would remain and, upon staff
recommendation, expansion would occur to allow a right turn lane from the site to
36th Street..
Mr. Garelick recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution approving the
amendment to the continued special permit subject to the conditions included in
the staff report. Mr. Gothberg seconded the motion and the motion passed on a
vote of 6-0 with Bissonnette, Bohn, Carver, Garelick, Gothberg and Velick voting
in favor.
Biii. Case No. 98-15-ZA -- Amendment to Zoning Ordinance regulating
screening of recreational vehicles in Residential Zoning Districts.
Ms. Erickson presented the staff report that outlined 2 screening provisions
suggested by City Council and recommended adoption of the Zoning Ordinance
amendments regulating screening of recreational vehicles in Residential Zoning
Districts.
Ms. Bohn inquired if there were any requirements for screening in rear yards that
did not abut a street in backyard. Ms. Erickson stated that requirement was
deleted by Council from the original ordinance.
Ms. Velick recommended screening when a rear yard abuts a neighbor.
Mr. Carver raised a question relative to the Inspections Department’s concern
with the language “from the street” and where to view the RV’s from.
Ms. Bissonnette recommended L shaped screening of small vehicles and some
large vehicles.
Mr. Garelick indicated a need to consider the complaints of neighbors.
Tim Fleming, 6632 West 18th Street, informed the Planning Commission about a
court case in Ohio where screening of recreational vehicles from neighboring
74
properties was found unconstitutional. He was concerned about the height
requirements of fencing and plant materials. He recommended that fencing be
placed on the property line rather than next to vehicles, but was concerned about
screening for seasonal vehicles.
Roger Dufner, 1865 Melrose Avenue, stated that if a recreational vehicle didn’t fit
in the garage, then the owner should get it off the property. He stated that since
the homes in St. Louis Park were close together, the neighbors should not have to
look at the vehicles.
Kathy Benshoof, 1631 Virginia Avenue, stated that she supports the proposed
ordinance. She recommended that screening also be required between houses, not
just adjacent to the street, extending the screening on larger RV’s to an L shape,
and screening of smaller vehicles in backyards. She was on the Task Force and
stated that screening was the compromise for not having any size limitation for
recreational vehicles in a backyard, and taking that away negated the intent of the
Task Force to keep neighborhoods beautiful.
Sharon Olson, 3500 Quebec Avenue, asked if there were any plans to screen the
satellites in the neighborhood parks and questioned the provision for permitting a
tow truck to be parked in a front yard.
Mr. Carver asked why the City Council asked staff to review screening
provisions.
Ms. Erickson stated that City Council wanted a better sense of how screening
could be accommodated.
Eleanor Pierce, 3300 Louisiana Avenue, stated that screening needed to be
required and owners of vehicles need to be responsible for their property.
Ms. Bissonnette asked if Mr. Fleming’s suggestion of placing a fence on property
line, rather than right next to vehicle, had been considered.
Ms. Erickson stated that there was no language in the proposed ordinance that
specifically stated where the fence was required to be located. She also stated that
the language proposed has been reviewed by City Council and the City Attorney,
and no problems had been indicated.
Mr. Gothberg asked what would happen if a neighbor opposed screening.
Ms. Erickson stated that any property owner has the right to install a fence on their
property regardless of a neighbor’s objections.
Mr. Garelick asked how the proposed screening ordinance compared with other
cities.
75
Ms. Erickson stated that the City of Bloomington has an ordinance which requires
screening unless a neighbor formaly opposes. She indicated that the City Attorney
said that this situation was not legal and the City could not allow a neighbor the
authority to grant variances. This is not permitted by the Zoning Ordinance.
Ms. Velick recommended that the City Council adopt the Zoning Ordinance
amendment regulating screening of recreational vehicles in Residential Zoning
Districts with the changes the Planning Commission recommended that the
vehicles in the back yards shall be screened from the street, park, and neighboring
property with a 90% opaque fence which is 6 feet high and plant materials which
at maturity have the ability to screen 100% of the height and 100% of the width of
the vehicle with a minimum of 50% opacity including the inclusion of L shaped
screening on corners. Mr. Garelick seconded the motion.
The Planning Commission and staff discussed visibility problems with location to
intersections and alleys. Judie Erickson reworded an amendment to the motion as
follows.
Ms. Velick recommended that City Council adopt the Zoning Ordinance
amendments regulating screening of recreational vehicles in Residential Zoning
Districts and change 9C to read the vehicle shall be screened from the street, from
any park, or adjacent properties with a 90% opaque fence which is 6 feet high and
plant material which at maturity have a ability to screen 100% of the height and
100% of the width of the vehicle with a minimum of 50% opacity, but will not
inhibit visibility at corners of intersections and alleys. Mr. Garelick seconded the
motion.
The Planning Commission discussed enforcement policies, different location of
vehicle on properties, other screening options, and prevention of screening
requirements from totally blocking in vehicles.
Ms. Velick withdrew her motion for further staff study.
Mr. Carver moved to table adoption of the Zoning Ordinance amendments for for
staff to develop new language. Ms. Bohn seconded the motion and the motion
passed on a vote of 6-0 with Bissonnette, Bohn, Carver, Garelick, Gothberg and
Velick voting in favor.
6. Communications
A. Recent City Council Action -- June 2, 1998
City Council approved flood plain text amendment.
City Council approved zoning ordinance for Sweet Corn & More agricultural
commodities up to 6 months and set second reading for June 15th.
B. Board of Zoning Appeals - Minutes of April 23, 1998
Agenda of May 28, 1998
76
C. Other - None
7. Miscellaneous - None
8. Adjournment
Vice Chair Bissonnette adjourned the meeting at 8:55 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Loftus
Administrative Secretary
Prepared by:
Shirley Olson
Recording Secretary
77
Item 9c*
MINUTES
HOUSING AUTHORITY
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
May 13, 1998 - 5:00 p.m.
Meadowbrook Manor Community Center
MEMBERS PRESENT: Catherine Courtney, William Gavzy, Bridget Gothberg,
Walter Hartman, Shone Row
STAFF PRESENT: Sharon Anderson, Joanna Brownstein, Tom Harmening,
Steve Nelson, Nancy Sells, Cindy Stromberg
OTHERS PRESENT: Matthew Foli, Campbell Knutson
Curt Peterson
1. Call to Order
Chairperson Gavzy called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes of May 13, 1998
Commissioner Gothberg moved approval of the minutes of May 13, 1998. Commissioner
Hartman seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0 with
Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Gothberg, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
3. Introduction
Commissioner Gothberg introduced Linda Trummer, Meadowbrook Collaborative
Outreach Coordinator. Ms. Trummer commented on the Collaborative, the Community
Center, and the Meadowbrook Manor complex.
4. Hearings: None
5. Reports and Committees: None
6. Unfinished Business: None
7. New Business
a. TRAILS
Mr. Harmening said that at the April meeting, staff had agreed to continue its
efforts in assessing the Authority's potential for obtaining outside funding. He
said that the services of Curt Peterson have been retained to assist in the
78
assessment. Mr. Harmening commented on the meeting staff and Mr. Peterson
had with the director of the Norwest Foundation to discuss TRAILS funding
questions. One of the director's recommendations was that the Authority ask
Employment Action Center (EAC) about its ability to make the program function
within current budgetary constraints.
Mr. Harmening reported on staff's meeting with EAC to discuss reducing the
funding gap. EAC staff indicated that the agency would not be able to obtain
additional funds but that it would work on ways to reduce expenses somewhat.
Mr. Peterson explained that part of the dilemma for TRAILS fundraising is that
the Authority is a government agency and it is asking for stop-gap money which is
difficult money to raise. He explained that most funders are not willing to fund
annual campaigns or operating support. He commented that most funders want
agencies to think more creatively about how they approach their business and get
support for that rather than for operating funds. Possible funding sources and idea
resources Mr. Peterson mentioned include Minnesota Future's Fund, Corporation
for Supportive Housing and the Hennepin County Private Industry Council. Mr.
Peterson suggested that a prospectus be written for submission to the Minnesota
Future's Fund to assist in discussion of the planning process for fundraising.
There was a discussion about how other agencies are funding their self-sufficiency
programs.
There was a discussion about the source of funds used by the Plymouth HRA for
TRAILS. Mr. Harmening reported that discussions will be held with the Plymouth
HRA regarding changing the current TRAILS budget split of 60-40.
There was a discussion about approaching the City Council about the use of
CDBG funds or a mill levy for TRAILS funding. Past inquiries about these
sources have not been successful. There was a discussion about the lack of a
political ally for the program.
Mr. Peterson commented on the implications of letting the program end if it is
perceived that efforts have not been made to save it.
Commissioner Gothberg said she supported the idea of developing a prospectus
for discussions with the Minnesota Future's Fund.
Commissioner Gavzy suggested that staff continue its research for another month
with the hope of continuing the program one more year to allow time to secure
permanent funding.
79
b. Public Housing Leases - Draft
Ms. Anderson introduced Matthew Foli of Campbell Knutson from the
Authority's attorney's office. Ms. Anderson explained that the lease has
undergone many revisions by the Authority's HUD representative, Mr. Foli and
herself.
Mr. Foli explained that he refined legal issues including grounds for termination
and tenant obligations. He said that resources for lease language included the
HUD model lease, the Code of Federal Regulations and case law.
Commissioner Gavzy noted concern about terms in the lease which are
contradictory to the Affirmation/Zero Tolerance for Criminal Activity. He
requested that staff and Mr. Foli examine the language in Section 17 (Lease
Termination), item q.
Commissioner Courtney expressed concern with Section 17 language regarding
serious or repeated violations as the language was problematic in the recent
eviction case. She said that the language doesn't tie into the Affirmation/Zero
Tolerance addendum. She said that she also has a problem with the language of
Section 4 (Occupancy), item e (2) regarding criminal activity and finds that it isn't
consistent with the language of the Affirmation/Zero Tolerance addendum.
Commissioner Gavzy asked if there was a way to combine items q., s., and t. in
Section 17 that would meet HUD requirements.
Mr. Foli suggesting combining some of these items and expanding on the
Affirmation/Zero Tolerance addendum.
Ms. Anderson commented on the usefulness of having lease violations listed
individually, rather than combined, for purposes of citing lease violations and
warning letters.
Commissioner Gavzy said that perhaps subjects should then be kept completely
separate with one paragraph relating to drugs only, criminal activity only, and
controlling guests only.
Mr. Foli and Commissioner Gavzy discussed the lease language regarding
unlawful guests and agreed that the language should be expanded.
Commissioner Courtney requested that language be revised for Section 4
(Occupancy), paragraph three, regarding children born into the household.
Mr. Harmening said that staff and Mr. Foli would look at all comments and bring
back a revision to the June meeting.
80
c. Section 8 Administrative Budget
Mr. Harmening explained that in the past a budget wasn't necessary because of the
surplus of administrative fees obtained from HUD.
Mr. Harmening said that Fiscal Year End 3/31/98 statements had just become
available and adjustments, including interest, will be made to the budget.
The Board by consensus accepted the proposed budget.
d. Public Housing Management Assessment Program
Resolution No. 445
Ms. Anderson distributed PHMAP Certification Form 50072 and reviewed the
completed information. She explained that several factors had contributed to the
form not being finished for the meeting. An earlier than usual May 31 deadline
meant that Fiscal Year End 3/31/98 statements, which are needed for back-up
worksheets, were not available until the last minute. Ms. Anderson said that she
was also waiting for HUD's response to questions regarding PHMAP program
changes.
Commissioners Courtney and Gavzy said they were not comfortable approving
the resolution until the form is completed. Ms. Anderson said that a letter could
be submitted with HUD Form 50072 explaining the situation and notifying HUD
that the resolution will be submitted after the next meeting of the Authority on
June 10.
e. Consolidated Annual Contributions Contract Amendment -
Section 8 Certificate Program
Commissioner Courtney moved that the Authority authorize execution of the
Annual Contributions Contract Amendment for the Section 8 Certificate
program. Commissioner Hartman seconded the motion, and the motion passed
on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting
in favor. (Note: Commissioner Gothberg left the meeting at 5:45 p.m.)
7. Communications from Executive Director
a. Claims List No. 98-5
Commissioner Hartman moved approval of Claims List No. 98-5 in the amount of
$153,551.24. Commissioner Courtney seconded the motion, and the motion
passed on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row
voting in favor.
81
b. Communications
(1) Monthly Report for May, 1998
The report was accepted and filed.
(2) Scattered Site Houses and Hamilton House Update
Commissioner Gavzy asked if the judge in the recent eviction proceeding
had issued a new Opinion. Mr. Foli reported that a response to the
Authority's letter has not yet been received.
(3) Update on Habitat Projects
Mr. Harmening reported that the program was allocated $80,000 in HOME
funds, half of the City's request, which will allow for the development of
two homes. He said the City Council has approved providing $40,000 in
CDBG funds to help facilitate two projects. Currently staff is looking at
three possible sites.
(4) Update on Home Renewal Program
Mr. Harmening reported that the closing for the Blackstone property
occurred in April. The purchase agreement with the neighboring property
owner for a portion of the Blackstone property was executed and earnest
money was received. The administrative subdivision is being approved
and demolition of the Blackstone home will occur in late May or early
June. Development agreements and more specific plans from two
interested builders may be presented to the Authority on June 10.
8. Other
Mr. Harmening said that the Contract for Authorization for the 4-d Program will be
presented at the June 10 meeting. Staff has indicated an interest in monitoring the
program locally as there are some revenues which can be achieved through this.
Mr. Harmening updated the Authority on the upcoming organizational study which will
take place over the months of June, July and August. AVI, a firm with expertise on
housing authorities, will conduct the study.
Commissioner Courtney requested that the Authority receive final drafts of the Mission
and Vision statements with the action plan to be presented at the June 10 meeting.
82
9. Adjournment
Commissioner Courtney moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Commissioner
Hartman seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with
Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
Respectfully submitted,
_______________________
Walter Hartman
Secretary
83
Item 9d*
MINUTES
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITILIZATION COMMISSION
MAY 13, 1998 – 7:00 P.M.
Community Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kellene Campbell-Duerksen, Dorothea Moga, Belinda Pinney, and
Tom Powers
MEMBERS ABSENT: Shirley Bell, Julie Hart
STAFF PRESENT: Joanna Brownstein, Housing Coordinator, Jan Loftus,
Administrative Secretary; and Rebecca Belz, Recording Secretary
1. Call to Order/Roll Call:
Co-chair Campbell-Duerksen called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. Mrs. Belz, the
Recording Secretary, called roll. Shirley Bell and Julie Hart were absent.
Co-chair Campbell-Duerksen reported the times allotted for each topic and appointed
Dorothea Moga as time keeper and Belinda Pinney as process observer.
2. Approval of Agenda:
Commissioner Pinney requested the agenda be amended to discuss New Business before
Unfinished Business. No other changes or additions were requested.
Tom Powers moved, seconded by Dorothea Moga, to accept the agenda as amended.
Motion carried unanimously.
3. Reports/Comments:
Mrs. Loftus made reference to the packet entitled “Organizing” that was included as a
follow-up to the Commission’s request regarding information that can be forwarded to
newly organized neighborhoods. She also made note of the additional information she
distributed at the beginning of the meeting relating to that topic. The Commission thanked
Mrs. Loftus and noted that it would be discussed at another meeting.
Mrs. Loftus reported that there is money available for training as Commissioner Powers had
asked her at a previous meeting.
Mrs. Loftus then reported that she had spoken with Mr. Whitlock who verbally resigned a
second time and that he would not be sending a written resignation.
Joanna Brownstein entered the meeting at 7:15 p.m.
84
Commissioner Powers reported having attended a potluck in the Eliot View neighborhood
and noted that it was not very successful. He reported that Eliot View continues to work
toward a stronger organization.
Commissioner Moga reported having discussed Tom Powers’ continued participation in the
Commission with the other Co-chairs and that she had a meeting with Charlie Meyer on the
subject. This will be put on the next agenda for further discussion.
4. Approval of Minutes of April 8, 1998:
Hearing no changes, Belinda Pinney moved, seconded by Tom Powers, to approve the
minutes of the April 8, 1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Commission Meeting as
presented. The motion carried unanimously.
There was discussion regarding the minutes and a request to delete the words “and
frustration” in the middle of the first paragraph of letter C under Unfinished Business on
page 3.
Belinda Pinney rescinded her motion to approve the minutes of the April 8, 1998
Neighborhood Revitalization Commission Meeting as presented. Tom Powers rescinded
his second.
Tom Powers moved, seconded by Belinda Pinney, to approve the minutes of the April 8,
1998 Neighborhood Revitalization Commission Meeting as amended. The motion carried
unanimously.
5. New Business:
Review 1998 Grants:
Joanna Brownstein gave a financial breakdown of monies awarded and spent in the
following manner:
$56,365 was awarded in the first three funding cycles (as of May 9, 1998)
$13,760 has been spent
$42,600 of the original award has not been spent
$6,805 has been returned
Which leaves $35,745 unspent.
The Commission requested that Ms. Brownstein return on May 27 to explain the status of
unspent funds in more detail.
In summary, she recapped for the Commission that, of the applications received, 21
projects had been requested from 10 neighborhoods in the amount of $17,000. She
then reviewed her summary in detail with the Commission neighborhood by
neighborhood noting items of importance and interest as well as giving update
85
information as necessary. Some questions, comments, and discussion by the
Commission included:
> Commissioner Powers suggested that in the event a grant should be denied
because of questions the NRC might have, that neighborhood representatives be
contacted for further clarification first.
> The Commission wondered if the Birchwood neighborhood had given more
information regarding the money they requested for railroad research. Ms.
Brownstein reported that the neighborhood was not sure how the funds would be
used at this point. The Commissioners agreed to invite the Birchwood
Neighborhood Association to its meeting on May 27, to provide more detail on
this proposed activity.
> Commissioner Pinney suggested the grant applications or the summary be
distributed to all neighborhood leaders as an example of the process and of what
is happening in other neighborhoods.
> Ms. Brownstein explained background information on the fence improvement
requests made by Lake Forest neighborhood and that the fences are private
property but are on the public right-of-way. Ms. Brownstein further explained
for the Commission that she had seen the fences and that they are in need of
repair. She also noted that the homeowners association for the neighborhood
owns them and was never intended for city maintenance. She had contacted
Public Works who believes it is appropriate if the Commission grants the
money, however suggested a contingency be attached to the approval by
stipulating that the maintenance is the homeowners association’s responsibility
in the future.
> The mini grant program proposed by the Fern Hill neighborhood was discussed
and ideas for accountability were suggested. Ms. Brownstein confirmed that
money distribution would be tracked. Ms. Brownstein also suggested obtaining
an outline of the program from the neighborhood once it has been further
developed.
> The proposed walking path in the Browndale neighborhood was discussed and
that Parks and Recreation will not be approving any new projects until a new
Director is hired. A letter of feasibility is still required for this improvement.
Tom Powers moved to approve the grant requests with the exception of the rail
road component of the Birchwood neighborhood’s request, and with the
stipulations that (1) Browndale’s path monies be conditional on receiving
approval from Parks and Recreation, (2) the Elmwood neighborhood's grant for
ornamental signposts is conditional upon receiving approval from Public Works
on color, style and materials; and (3) Lake Forest must reach an agreement with
Public Works regarding the proposed fences and entrance signs, especially their
maintenance.
86
Commissioner Moga noted that the math on the Fern Hill grant application is
incorrect. Dorothea Moga amended the motion by adding the stipulation to
approve the correct dollar amount for the Fern Hill grant request.
Belinda Pinney seconded the motion. The motion carried unanimously.
The Commission decided to discuss the remaining available grant money at another
meeting. The Commission also suggested, to include on a forthcoming agenda, a
discussion regarding grants for neighborhoods formed mid-year.
Joanna Brownstein left the meeting at 8:30 p.m.
B. NRC Booth for Parktacular:
Mrs. Loftus noted the Parktacular applications she distributed at the beginning of the
meeting and gave some specific information about working at the summer event.
She also reported of a Senior’s Dinner that needed volunteer help.
The Commission discussed the responsibilities and opened the floor for comments.
Commissioner Powers reported that he did not believe this to be a responsibility of
the NRC and did not believe much recruitment or contact could be made.
Commissioner Pinney agreed. Commissioner Moga felt the Commission may be
over extended this year, however, could entertain the project again next year. Co-
chair Campbell-Duerksen did not believe the Commission needed any promotion at
this time. Mrs. Loftus reported that she believed that this event may not be the
appropriate place for neighborhood recruitment.
C. Review Map of Neighborhoods yet to be organized:
Mrs. Loftus noted the inclusion of the map indicating neighborhoods organized, not
organized, pending and neighborhoods whose organization has lapsed. There was
also discussion about the “organized” neighborhood and that though they may be
technically organized, they may be stagnant in their involvement, there may be few
interested residents, etc. This confirmed their discussions to focus on stimulating
and retaining existing neighborhoods.
Co-chair Campbell-Duerksen reported that she and Commissioner Powers had
discussed an approach in planning this year’s organizational meeting schematic.
They decided to contact all the Ward Council members to ask them for their input
regarding their Wards. They could develop a plan from that information.
6. Unfinished Business
A. Update on hiring new staff position:
87
Mrs. Loftus reported that after the Council Meeting, where the Neighborhood
Coordinator position was discussed, other staff members present remembered that
the Community Connections Task Force of Vision St. Louis Park, had
recommended creating a staff position called “ Community Outreach Liaison.”
After checking into this further, staff developed a new job description that includes
all of the duties for the proposed NRC liaison position and made another
presentation to Council who approved going forward with the position. Mrs. Loftus
noted the copy of the memo to the Mayor and City Council she distributed at the
beginning of the meeting and asked the Commission for their thoughts. The
Commission noted that they would like more time to look at the memo and the job
description and would like to revisit this topic at another meeting.
B. Work Plan Proposal:
Commissioner Moga reported that since two of the Commissioners were absent, she
would like to postpone the discussion about the proposed subcommittees until they
can be present. She suggested that the subcommittee heads continue to tighten up
their goals and encouraged them to continue with their duties. She also noted that
the official elections should be done as soon as possible to move forward with the
Commission’s plans for the year. It was noted that Council will be voting on the
Bylaw and Ordinance changes next Monday so the Commission should be able to
hold elections at the next meeting.
Bridget Wynn entered the meeting at 8:50 p.m.
7. Miscellaneous:
A. Children’s First Ice Cream Social:
Mrs. Loftus reminded the Commission that the event is Sunday, May 17, 1998 from
2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Oak Hill Park and Commissioners are welcome to
attend.
8. Agenda for May 27, 1998:
Items for discussion at another meeting include but are not limited to:
A. Discussion with Charlie Meyer regarding Tom Powers’ involvement with the
Commission.
B. Remaining Grant Funds and a Second Grant Run.
C. Grants for newly organized neighborhoods outside the grant cycle.
D. Elections
E. Work Plan
F. Staff Position
G. Sub Committee reports
H. Documents/Information to newly organized neighborhoods as distributed at May 13,
1998 meeting.
88
8. Evaluation:
The Commission briefly evaluated the meeting. Most agreed this meeting ran smoothly and
that the times were accurately outlined. Commissioner Moga commended Co-chair
Campbell-Duerksen for her efforts.
9. Adjournment:
Co-chair Campbell-Duerksen adjourned the meeting at 9:03 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Rebecca L. Belz
Recording Secretary
ATTEST:
Jan Loftus
Administrative Secretary
89
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #9e*
Meeting of July 6, 1998
Vendor Claims
June 19, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
AARCEE PARTY RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,011.75
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 128.37
ALBINSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.34
ALLEN, JULIE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 1,014.00
ALLIANCE MECHANICAL SERVICES I BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 92.00
ALMSTED'S NEW MARKET CONCESSION SUPPLIES 26.40
ANCHOR PAPER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 567.45
ANDERSEN INC, EARL F GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,385.40
ANDERSEN, KATIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
ASI SIGN SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.78
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES POSTAGE 22.72
AUTO GLASS SPECIALISTS INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 275.56
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 79.50
AUTOMATIC SYSTEMS INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 135.00
AWD COOLERS OF MINNESOTA CONCESSION SUPPLIES 86.27
BACHMANS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 567.41
BARTLETT CO INC, S H BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 235.36
BEACON BALLFIELDS SMALL TOOLS 112.46
BERNDT ELECTRIC SERVICE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 306.14
BLAIR, EMILY SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 85.50
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.97
BORDER STATES ELECTRIC SUPPLY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 156.31
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 4.80
BRIGHAM-YOUNG UNIVERSITY GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00
BRO TEX INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 625.25
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BURNS, KELLY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
CAMPBELL KNUTSON SCOTT & FUCHS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,449.98
CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199.92
CARLSON EQUIPMENT COMPANY BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 6,654.16
CEMSTONE PRODUCT CO. SMALL TOOLS 29.04
CHENEY SIGNS GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.50
COLLINS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 56.25
CONTACT MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 80.00
CP LIMITED PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,741.77
CULLIGAN BOTTLED WATER GENERAL SUPPLIES 217.58
D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 75.90
DALCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 866.80
DAYTON'S/TARGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 127.79
DCA INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 302.84
DEVOE & RAYNOLDS BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 318.49
DITZLER PROPERTIES INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 50.00
DRYWALL SUPPLY INC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 83.22
DUNDEE NURSERY LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,646.66
90
DVORAK, BRAD GENERAL SUPPLIES 119.85
ENSR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,335.97
ERICKSON, TONIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
FAIRCON SERVICE MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 1,443.75
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,346.95
FELT, MERIWETHER GENERAL SUPPLIES 89.26
FIRST TRUST NATIONAL ASSOC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00
FLYERS, THE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00
FONTENOT, NIKKI SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 147.25
FOULKES, MARGARET OTHER REVENUE 25.00
FRESCO INC SMALL TOOLS 55.74
GARBINA'S DELI & SANDWICH SHOP TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 400.44
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 57.18
GORHAM-OIEN MECH. INC. BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 595.39
GRAINGER INC, W W BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 695.17
GREEN TREE VENDOR SERVICES COR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 751.89
HABERMAN, JULIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 493.71
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 1,138.13
HEARING CARE SPECIALISTS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 48.72
HEIN-FERRIS, MEGAN PROGRAMMING 31.00
HENN CO INFORMATION SERVICES COMPUTER SERVICES 128.71
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 7,712.64
HEWLETT-PACKARD CO OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 959.03
HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 83.03
HILL, HAROLD INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
HODGDON, GREGG STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 683.33
HODGSON, KELLIE INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
HOME DEPOT/GECF GENERAL SUPPLIES 574.24
HOME HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 930.10
HOST, JUSTINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 36,438.58
HUGHES, CARRIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.00
HUMPHREY, NINA GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
HYDRO SUPPLY COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 919.73
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 125.24
IMAGE NOW SIGNS & DESIGN GENERAL SUPPLIES 83.29
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (115.91)
INTERIM PERSONNEL -EDINA SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 489.60
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (166.20)
INTERTEC PRESENTATIONS TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 660.00
J & F REDDY RENTS RENTAL EQUIPMENT 185.25
JAVNER, JOHN B MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 119.60
JESSEN PRESS INC PRINTING & PUBLISHING 4,769.47
JONES, TANYA GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
JUSTUS LUMBER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 155.15
K & K SALES BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 235.85
KLODT INCORPORATED INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
KNOTT, MARCY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 65.74
LANDGREN, ROGER INSURANCE BENEFITS 163.77
91
LINDSTROM, MEGAN M SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 114.00
LINSK FLOWERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 34.29
LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 25,089.28
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS (13.53)
LUSE, JOHN STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 203.75
MAGLE, MATT SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 104.50
MAIL BOXES ETC # 1236 GENERAL SUPPLIES 551.14
MANTZ, JOHN GENERAL SUPPLIES 82.00
MARDI ASSOCIATES OTHER ADVERTISING 840.00
MENARDS EQUIPMENT PARTS 117.59
METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 14,563.33
METRO SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 70.29
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL SEWER AVAILABILITY CHARGE 4,950.00
MIDWEST LANDSCAPES LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 4,794.00
MINION, STEFANIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
MINN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 3,434.50
MINN STATE TREASURER BUILDING 1,953.91
MINN SUN PUBLICATIONS LEGAL NOTICES 47.84
MN CHAPTER OF AIIM TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 55.00
MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 75.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 165.00
MUNICILITE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 453.26
MURPHY, KATHY MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 146.25
NAWROCKI, MARK INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
NEXTEL RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 97.65
NORANDEX BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 454.85
NORMANDALE COMMUNITY COLLEGE GENERAL SUPPLIES 500.00
NORTH STAR TURF SUPPLY LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,290.91
NORTHERN WATER TREATING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 363.20
NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 309.92
O'BRIEN, MARY BRIDGET SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 161.50
OBERPRILLER, LORA GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 231.29
ORKIN PEST CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 60.92
PALMS BAKERY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16.64
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL SALARIES - REGULAR EMPLOYEES 432.00
PARTS ASSOCIATES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 184.25
PERSPECTIVES INC MEETING EXPENSE 180.79
PETERSEN, ERNEST H MEETING EXPENSE 46.00
PIRES, CLINTON E TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 159.61
POWERS, LAUREL R INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
PRESTIGE LINCOLN MERCURY EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3.20
PROCESS MEASUREMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 286.49
PROEX PHOTO SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 74.35
QEC-MN POSTAGE 786.99
QUANTERRA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVIC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,100.00
RADIO SHACK GENERAL SUPPLIES 359.98
RAINBOW FOODS TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 161.98
RANDY'S SANITATION INC GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 2,913.17
REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.73
92
ROGERS ENTERPRISES INC MOTOR FUELS 41.85
ROSS, JOHN INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
ROSSEN, BARRY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
SAFETY-KLEEN CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 215.93
SAMPSON MILLER ADVERTISING GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.52
SCHEAR, MORRIS INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
SECRETARY OF STATE GENERAL SUPPLIES 46.50
SEDGWICK JAMES OF MINN INC PROF/CONSULT SERVICES 1,485.00
SMART TEMPTATIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 156.00
SMITH PARKER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,314.51
SPS COMPANIES INC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 19.16
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 23,775.63
ST LOUIS PARK TRUE VALUE GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.54
ST LOUIS SENIOR PROGRAM GENERAL SUPPLIES 178.59
STANDARD PLUMBING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,054.65
STAR TRIBUNE OTHER ADVERTISING 789.75
STREICHER'S EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,234.49
SUBURBAN FEED & SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 93.83
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 184.34
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 4.96
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 4,011.13
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,701.00
UNITOG RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 253.36
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 376.97
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 170.00
VALLEY HYDRAULIC SERVICE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 398.36
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 340.31
VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 580.00
VOELKER, STACY M MEETING EXPENSE 185.20
WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 82.00
WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CTR GENERAL SUPPLIES 134.72
WILLIAMS STEEL & HDWE EQUIPMENT PARTS (79.85)
WOODWARD, TRAVIS SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 120.65
WSB ASSOCIATES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,491.50
WYNINGER, LYNN OTHER REVENUE 70.00
ZAHL EQUIPMENT GENERAL SUPPLIES 709.78
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 575.85
ZEP MANUFACTURING GENERAL SUPPLIES 303.87
ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 62.86
ZIP SORT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99.66
253,826.06
June 26, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
3M COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 57.51
ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 5.50
ABRUZZESE, GRETA OTHER REVENUE 25.00
AID ELECTRIC SERVICE INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 113.40
93
AL'S LIQUOR STORE INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 895.00
ALMSTED'S NEW MARKET TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 107.36
ANN'S TOOL SUPPLY SMALL TOOLS 142.88
AT&T WIRELESS SERVICES TELEPHONE 69.22
BARTELS, LARRY T INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
BATTERIES PLUS GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.88
BCL APPRAISALS INC. OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 350.00
BECKER, CAROLE MEETING EXPENSE 187.46
BENNETTS CYCLE INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 223.83
BENSHOOF & ASSOCIATES INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 790.50
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 283.40
BOCHE, BRIDGETT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 83.35
BONESTROO ROSENE ANDERLIK PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,248.60
BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,600.00
BRENTS SIGNS BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 175.73
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BROWN, VANESSA MEETING EXPENSE 33.87
CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC. OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 785.00
CHENEY SIGNS GENERAL SUPPLIES 15.75
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 85.36
COMM ACTION FOR SUBURBAN HENNE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,051.00
COMM INVOLVEMENT PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,129.00
COORDINATED BUSINESS SYSTEMS L OFFICE SUPPLIES 79.00
CUSTOM GRAPHIX PRINTING & PUBLISHING 480.32
CYLINDER CITY INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 518.16
DALCO GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.25
DAVIDMAN, JEFF PRINTING & PUBLISHING 16.19
DELEGARD TOOL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 17.04
DEVOE & RAYNOLDS BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 2,278.14
DOHMAN, WARD GENERAL SUPPLIES 150.00
DORFMAN, GAIL GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.68
DUNDEE NURSERY LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 65.16
EGAN FIELD & NOWAK INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 900.00
ELFERING, AMY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 955.35
GALL'S INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 260.94
GAUTHIER, SUSAN MISCELLANEOUS 30.00
GENERAL CINEMA GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,253.00
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 801.74
GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 505.75
HACKLEY, DAVID GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.00
HANSEN SOFTWARE INC TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 400.00
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 2,920.24
HENN CO TREASURER OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 48.12
HENNEPIN PARKS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 54.00
HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,145.00
HOME DEPOT/GECF EQUIPMENT PARTS 493.10
HUNTER, GLENN TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 74.15
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 37.62
INDELCO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 46.39
94
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (75.85)
INGRAHAM & VOSS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 927.40
INTERIM PERSONNEL -EDINA SALARIES - REGULAR EMPLOYEES 612.00
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (166.20)
IOS CAPITAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 516.53
J & F REDDY RENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 60.00
JAMES BROS GENERAL SUPPLIES 613.00
KIENENBERGER, BRIDGET MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 68.58
KNOX LUMBER COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.01
LABOR RELATIONS ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 646.00
LARSON ELECTRIC CO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 290.12
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 60.47
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS (13.53)
LORENZ, STUART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 909.50
MACQUEEN EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,538.82
MERRILL, ANN OTHER REVENUE 35.00
METRO COUNCIL ENVIRONMENTAL SE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 273,157.66
MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 663.00
MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 83.00
MIDWEST LANDSCAPES LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS 3,711.00
MINN SUN PUBLICATIONS LEGAL NOTICES 843.12
MINNESOTA CONWAY GENERAL SUPPLIES 191.70
MINNESOTA WANNER SMALL TOOLS 70.95
MN ASSOC OF WOMEN POLICE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 75.00
MN BOARD OF AELSLAGID SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 70.00
MN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION TELEPHONE 9.95
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY LICENSES/TAXES 70.00
MN WASTEWATER OPERATORS ASSOC TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 145.00
MPLS DEPT OF HEALTH/FAMILY SUP OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74.40
NATHENSON & ASSOCIATES, JUDITH GENERAL SUPPLIES 201.44
NEENAH FOUNDREY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 13,328.48
NOKLEBY, CHAD INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
NORTHERN WATER TREATING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.45
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 80.84
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 118.84
PALM BROTHERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 99.36
PAPA JOHNS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 79.45
PARK BLVD HOUSING LTD PARTNERS CONTRIBUTIONS/DONATIONS 30.00
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 647.00
PARKLYNN BUILDERS COMPANY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,529.00
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL SALARIES - REGULAR EMPLOYEES 425.25
PARTS PLUS-NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIV EQUIPMENT PARTS (300.74)
PERSPECTIVES INC MEETING EXPENSE 27.86
PRESTIGE LINCOLN MERCURY EQUIPMENT PARTS 203.52
PRINTERS SERVICE EQUIPMENT PARTS 55.05
QUEST ENGINEERING INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 14.87
RAINBOW FOODS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 120.60
RAYMOND COMMODORE AMIGA GENERAL SUPPLIES 6.50
REYNOLDS WELDING SUPPLY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 35.75
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS 17.83
95
ROLLINS OIL CO MOTOR FUELS 212.73
RUDDLE, MARJEAN OFFICE SUPPLIES 353.32
SAM'S CLUB GENERAL SUPPLIES 359.28
SCHELEN-GRAY AUTO ELECTRIC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 383.71
SCHROEDER, GRACE INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 50.00
ST JOSEPH'S EQUIPMENT INC RENTAL EQUIPMENT 958.50
ST LOUIS PARK TRUE VALUE GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.48
STREICHER'S EQUIPMENT PARTS 869.38
SUBURBAN TIRE CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 9.05
THOMPSON, WILLIAM PROGRAMMING 100.00
TIERNEY BROTHERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 82.34
TRACY/TRIPP FUELS MOTOR FUELS 6,345.92
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 101.70
TWIN CITIES HUMAN RESOURCE ASS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 205.00
U S IDENTIFICATION MANUAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 72.50
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 650.42
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.70
UNITOG RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 326.19
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 342.14
USI INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 84.03
VALLEYFAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,825.00
VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,425.41
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 201.29
WAGNER, ANNA FOOD ESTABLISHMENT 365.00
WELDON, PAT TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 270.00
WILD MOUNTAIN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 870.00
WILLIAMS STEEL & HDWE EQUIPMENT PARTS (79.85)
WSB ASSOCIATES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 751.50
ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3,156.55
ZIP SORT POSTAGE 37.38
363,831.93
July 2, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
1ST J P SOUSA MEMORIAL BAND FU OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00
A I C P A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 95.00
A T S S A INC TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 375.00
AA EQUIPMENT COMPANY BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 191.56
AARCEE PARTY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 101.68
ABLE COURIER OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31.60
ACORN NATURALISTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.85
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.14
ALBINSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.64
ALLIANCE MECHANICAL SERVICES I BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 92.00
ALMSTED'S NEW MARKET GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.11
ANDERSEN INC, EARL F GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,884.29
ANDERSON, ROGER GENERAL CUSTOMERS 24.27
96
AUDIO-TECHNICA U S INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.95
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 595.90
BANNERS TO GO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 1,021.85
BATTERIES PLUS GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.52
BENSON, BRADLEY GENERAL CUSTOMERS 33.45
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,892.93
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 327.38
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 209.56
BRO TEX INC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 266.25
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BURNETT TITLE GENERAL CUSTOMERS 17.88
BUSINESS HEALTH SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00
CHEYENNE LAND CO INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
CLOSERS FINALIS GENERAL CUSTOMERS 590.38
COLLISYS ELECTRIC CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 852.00
COMMERCIAL PARTNERS TITLE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 437.80
CRILEY, KATHI L MEETING EXPENSE 66.79
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 588.05
DAKOTA CO TECH COLLEGE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 75.00
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 220.06
DCA INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.58
DELARIAS KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 730.86
DERMCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 840.00
E & S ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 114.60
EDINA REALTY TITLE GENERAL CUSTOMERS 191.19
ELLANSON, LUKE R STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 230.50
ELVIN SAFETY SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 117.40
ERICKSON, RICHARD OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 645.00
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO ENGINEERING SERVICES 180.00
FAIRMONT FIRE SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 112.91
FAST SIGNS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,145.97
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 11.34
G & K SERVICES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 37.12
GENERAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 132.52
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 30.44
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 922.99
GOODIN COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 268.57
GREEN TREE VENDOR SERVICES COR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 751.89
GULBENKIAN SWIM INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 124.96
HABERMAN, JULIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 492.72
HAMEED, ADAM GENERAL CUSTOMERS 85.05
HAMILTON, JAYME GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.40
HENN CO TREASURER SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 12,756.52
HOME DEPOT/GECF GENERAL SUPPLIES 318.41
HOME HARDWARE EQUIPMENT PARTS 1.05
HOTTMAN, MARK GENERAL CUSTOMERS 116.17
HUD #271-533972-6 GENERAL CUSTOMERS 392.92
INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (75.85)
INTERIM PERSONNEL -EDINA SALARIES - REGULAR EMPLOYEES 589.05
97
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (166.20)
IOS CAPITAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1,020.27
JOHNSON, BILL GENERAL SUPPLIES 250.00
JOHNSON, DAVID GENERAL CUSTOMERS 98.34
JOHNSON, SALLY OTHER REVENUE 25.00
KIT & KABBODLE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00
KLODT INCORPORATED INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
KNOX LUMBER EQUIPMENT PARTS 35.39
KNOX LUMBER COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 281.63
KONICA BUSINESS MACHINES RENTAL EQUIPMENT 157.74
KURZEKA, LOUISE GENERAL SUPPLIES 317.10
L M C INSURANCE TRUST PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 47,353.25
LAND CARE EQUIPMENT CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 15.35
LAPOINTE SIGN INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,919.00
LARSON ELECTRIC CO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 1,707.07
LASER QUIPT COMPUTER SERVICES 1,043.49
LINHOFF PHOTO & DIGITAL IMAGIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.47
LITECKY, JOHN MISCELLANEOUS 25.00
LONG LAKE POWER EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 26.30
LONG LAKE TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS (13.53)
MACQUEEN EQUIP CO TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 674.44
MATTHEWS LAWN SERVICE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,739.18
MC LAUGHLIN, JOANNA L SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 400.00
MECA SPORTSWEAR GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,536.33
MELLON PROPERTIES GENERAL CUSTOMERS 194.44
MENARDS SMALL TOOLS 49.48
MERTENS, MATT INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
METRO SYSTEMS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 626.23
MEYER, CHARLES MEETING EXPENSE 169.81
MICKELSON PLUMBING PLUMBING 70.00
MICRO WAREHOUSE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 235.12
MINNESOTA TRUCKING ASSOC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 324.41
MINNETONKA TITLE GENERAL CUSTOMERS 34.24
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY LICENSES/TAXES 120.00
MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 174.75
MN PIPE & EQUIPMENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 601.19
MUNICILITE EQUIPMENT PARTS 114.00
N Y S C A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35.00
NORTH STAR CONCRETE COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 928.54
NORTH STAR TITLE GENERAL CUSTOMERS 67.34
NORTHERN PYROTECHNICS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,500.00
NORTHERN WATER TREATING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 92.39
NRG DISTRIBUTORS MOTOR FUELS 46.20
NSP CO ELECTRIC SERVICE 3,300.71
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 365.13
OLD REPUBLIC TITLE GENERAL CUSTOMERS 68.94
OPM INFORMATION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 190.00
OSTERHUS, CAROL INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
OTTO LANDSCAPING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,946.25
P & H WAREHOUSE SALES INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 228.91
98
PADGETT THOMPSON TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 447.00
PALM BROTHERS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 1,185.12
PARK PET HOSPITAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 612.38
PARKLYNN BUILDERS COMPANY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 292.00
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL SALARIES - REGULAR EMPLOYEES 432.00
PARTS PLUS-NORTHSTAR AUTOMOTIV EQUIPMENT PARTS (240.01)
PHYSIO-CONTROL CORPORATION GENERAL SUPPLIES 236.21
POINTED PRINTING SERVICES GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.87
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 58.45
PRESTIGE LINCOLN MERCURY EQUIPMENT PARTS 68.41
QUANTERRA ENVIRONMENTAL SERVIC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,050.00
QUEST ENGINEERING INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 21.46
RAINBOW FOODS MEETING EXPENSE 61.41
RARDIN, MICHAEL TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 35.00
RC INDENTIFICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.65
RELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLIES 26.48
RICK'S BOWLING & SPORTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 405.00
ROBINSON, CHARLES SEASON TICKET-RESIDENT 30.00
SAMPSON MILLER ADVERTISING GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.88
SCHERER, MIKE INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
SCHWAAB INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 35.13
ST CROIX RECREATION COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 12,600.00
ST LOUIS PARK TRUE VALUE GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.54
STAT MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 66.60
STEPHANSEN, CHRISTINE GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.16
STRAND MFG COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 404.66
STREICHER'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.17
STROM, DOUGLAS A INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
SUBURBAN TIRE CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 509.34
SUPERIOR FORD MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 82,964.00
SYSTEMS SUPPLY INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 287.02
TIERNEY BROTHERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 142.37
TKDA OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 256.55
TRACY/TRIPP FUELS MOTOR FUELS 6,647.80
TRI STATE BOBCAT RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1,137.60
TRIARCO ARTS & CRAFTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.66
TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 111.99
TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICE CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 732.99
TWIN CITY WATER CLINIC INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 765.00
UNITOG RENTAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 918.56
UNITOG RENTAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 223.35
URBAN, LINDA OTHER REVENUE 35.00
VAN METER & ASSOCIATES TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 165.00
VAN WATERS & ROGERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,765.27
VELANDER, PAM SEASON TICKET-RESIDENT 90.00
VESSCO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 184.63
VIDEO MAGAZINE SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 17.94
VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 393.03
VIKING INDUSTRIAL CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES 285.94
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 73.67
99
WANZEK CONSTRUCTION INC. OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,529.14
WASTE MANAGEMENT-SAVAGE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 152,557.65
WEST WELD EQUIPMENT PARTS 162.63
WESTWOOD HEALTH CARE CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.61
WHITE, PERRY GENERAL SUPPLIES 32.00
WILLIAMS STEEL & HDWE EQUIPMENT PARTS 58.24
WYNN, BRIDGET GENERAL SUPPLIES 104.56
ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 994.26
ZIP PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 63.69
ZIP SORT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55.58
403,362.85
July 1, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,433.38
ANDERSON, CARLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 157.00
ANOKA HIGH SCHOOL GENERAL SUPPLIES 550.00
BLACK SHADOW CARRIAGES GENERAL SUPPLIES 250.00
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 203.00
FLEISCHAUER, PHYLLIS INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
GOVT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOC GENERAL SUPPLIES 415.00
GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 4,151.00
HABERMAN, DAVE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,600.00
HENNEPIN COUNTY SUPPORT & COLL DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,012.82
HILL, HAROLD INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,503.65
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-401 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 236.44
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 9,868.01
LAND TITLE INC LAND 508,000.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,914.00
MINN COMM OF REVENUE SEASON TICKETS 34,557.00
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 321.00
MN DEPT OF REVENUE MOTOR FUELS 204.43
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,515.00
MRR COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 83.07
PAPA JOHNS PIZZA MEETING EXPENSE 193.06
PARK NATIONAL BANK DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 97,410.62
PERA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 44,993.11
PERA FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT ASSO DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 3,207.60
PERA POLICE RETIREMENT ASSOC DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 8,430.68
RHODES, JIM GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
SATIN DOLLS & COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.00
SLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS-LOCA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 803.60
SLP CREDIT UNION DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 30,732.42
SOUTHWEST HIGH SCHOOL GENERAL SUPPLIES 450.00
ST FRANCIS HIGH SCHOOL GENERAL SUPPLIES 550.00
STILLMAN, MARK GENERAL SUPPLIES 75.00
SYNCHRONIZED SWIM TEAM GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
100
TWIN CITY UNICYCLE CLUB GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00
USCM / MIDWEST DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 6,921.22
WORDERMAN, TOM GENERAL SUPPLIES 250.00
ZURAH SHRINE BAND GENERAL SUPPLIES 300.00
762,802.11
July 1, 1998
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
COPYMED INC WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 10.12
CORRICK MD, PATRICK W WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 607.91
EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 144.96
HOPKINS FAMILY PHYSICIANS WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 86.83
MARR, ALLISON WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 40.00
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 322.26
PARKER, JON INJURY PAY 369.00
PAULOUSKI, WADE INJURY PAY 1,672.07
SEDGEWICK MANAGED CARE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 28.50
SMART CORPORATION WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 31.70
SPINAL CARE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 138.90
THOMPSON, JIM INJURY PAY 429.49
TWIN CITIES ORTHO PA WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 189.69
WARD, JEFFREY INJURY PAY 2,077.46
6,148.89
101
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #11a
Meeting of July 6, 1998
11a. DKH Settlement
Dependent on discussion to take place in executive session prior to the regular City
Council meeting, action by the Council may be required.
Recommended
Action:
To be determined following discussion with City Attorney
102
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #11b
Meeting of July 6, 1998
11b. Authorization of Trail and Sidewalk Plan
Request for authorization to undertake the preparation of a City-wide trail and
sidewalk plan for inclusion into the Comprehensive Plan.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve the scope of work for the City-Wide Trail and
Sidewalk Plan project and to authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to execute a contract with Close Landscape
Architecture for professional services to complete the Plan
Background:
On June 22, 1998, the City Council discussed the scope of work submitted by Close Landscape
Architecture and SRF Consulting Group to develop a system of improved sidewalks, trails and
pathways to provide better access to community facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. Close
Landscape Architecture, Inc. teamed with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. and were one of four
submittals received for the project. The design team of Close Landscape Architecture, Inc. and
SRF Consulting Group, Inc., based on their experience and expertise, was chosen and asked to
submit a scope of work (see attached) for the project.
With the exception of a summary report, the project is proposed to be completed by mid
December and will consist of three phases. Phase One, to be conducted in July and August, will
consist of data collection and a visioning process with the City Council to determine broad
parameters of the project. During these workshops funding issues and community input
processes will be discussed. The Council will also be asked to determine the make-up of the task
force. (The two visioning workshops with the City Council are proposed for the study sessions
of July 27 and August 24.) Phase Two would include sending out a community questionnaire,
working with a citizen task force and holding open houses to help design the trail and sidewalk
system. This would include locating and prioritizing different segments of a system. There will
also be presentations to the Planning Commission, Park and Recreation Commission, and
Business Council, and City Council during Phase Two. Phase Three would finalize funding
sources and implementation strategies for actual construction. The final presentation to the City
Council is scheduled for December 15, 1998.
The estimated cost of this project is $66,750. Funds to cover the project costs will be received in
the form of a loan from the Metropolitan Council. This loan was offered to the City for the
purpose of updating the Comprehensive Plan.
This study is intended to result in a plan for the location and implementation of an expanded
sidewalk and trail system to meet the needs of the community, the goals of Vision St. Louis Park,
and the principles of Livable Communities.
103
Attachments: (On file in Clerk’s Office)
Proposed Contract
Scope of Work
Project Budget
Project Schedule
Prepared by: Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager