HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999/02/16 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular 1
Economic Development Authority meeting will not be held this evening.
AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
February 16, 1999
7:30 p.m.
1. Call to order
2. Presentation
3. Roll Call
4. Approval of Minutes
a. City Council meeting of February 1, 1999
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
b. Study session meeting of January 25, 1999
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
5. Approval of agenda
a. Consent agenda
Note: All matters on consent (starred items) are considered to be routine and will be enacted by
one motion approving all. There is no separate discussion of these items. If discussion is
desired, the starred item will be moved to the regular agenda.
Action: Motion to approve - Motion to delete item(s)
b. Agenda
Action: Motion to approve - Motion to add item(s)
*c. Resolutions and Ordinances
Action: By consent, waive reading of resolutions and ordinances
6. Public Hearing
6a Public Hearing - Change of Liquor License from On-Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor
2
to On-sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales
Texa-Tonka Lanes - 8200 Minnetonka Blvd
Hearing to consider upgrading the license for Texa-Tonka Lanes from the On-sale
3.2% Malt Liquor license to On-sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales..
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve the license
change.
6b. Public Hearing for Temporary On-sale Intoxicating Liquor License on
February 20, 1999
Jewish Community Center - 4330 So. Cedar Lake Road
This hearing considers granting the Jewish Community Center a one-day license for
On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve the
Temporary On-sale Liquor License for the Jewish Community
Center.
7. Petitions, Requests, Communications
8. Resolutions and Ordinances
8a. Request to approve attached Public Tree Removal Policy.
Council consideration of Public Tree Removal Policy
Recommended
Action:
Staff recommends Council approval of the Public Tree Removal
policy.
8b. City Engineer’s Report: Watermain replacement on Ford Road from Ford
Lane to the north frontage road of I-394 - Project No. 99-01) and roadway mill
and overlay - (Project No. 97-22).
This report considers the replacement of watermain in Ford Road from Ford Lane
to the north frontage road of I-394 and a roadway mill and overlay.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution accepting this report,
establishing Project Nos. 99-01 and 97-22, ordering Project Nos.
99-01 and 97-22, approving plans and specifications, and
authorizing receipt of bids.
3
8c. City Engineer’s Report: Street Rehabilitation, Crack Repair, Random Curb
and Gutter Repair, and Sealcoat on Parkdale Drive from Park Place
Boulevard to Trunk Highway 100 - Project No. 98-12.
This report considers the rehabilitation of Parkdale Drive with crack repair, random
curb and gutter repair, and sealcoat.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution accepting this report,
establishing Project No. 98-12, ordering Project No. 98-12,
approving plans and specifications, and authorizing receipt of
bids.
8d. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - PUD Ordinance
Case No. 99-01-ZA
Second Reading of a Zoning Ordinance amendment to allow density and height
modifications to be approved by PUD as long as they are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve second reading, adopt ordinance, approve
summary and authorize publication.
8e. Resolution Stating City Goals Regarding The Year 2000 Problem And
Appointing Year 2000 Coordinator
Adoption of document stating City goals with respect to Year 2000 issues,
appointing the Deputy City Manager as Y2K Coordinator; and adopting “Year 2000
Readiness Disclosure” statement.
Recommended
Action:
Adopt the attached resolution stating City goals regarding the
Year 2000 problem and appointing the City’s Year 2000
coordinator. Approve the attached “Year 2000 Readiness
Disclosure” statement.
*8f. Resolution Supporting Housing Authority Application to Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency (MHFA) under the Single Family Combined Programs
Request for Proposals.
If the application is funded by MHFA, a program will be established to provide
financing for improvements needed to resolve code violations, including exterior
maintenance violations on single family homes.
4
Recommended
Action:
Move to approve a resolution supporting the Housing
Authority’s application to the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency under the December 1998 Single Family Combined
Programs Request for Proposals
*8g. Hennepin County Municipal Recycling Grant Application
This request is for authorization to apply to Hennepin County for a grant to fund the
City’s curbside recycling program.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing application
for a Hennepin County grant to fund the City’s curbside
recycling program.
*8h. Resolution of Appreciation to Trail and Sidewalk Task Force
The Council is requested to adopt a resolution of commendation and appreciation
for the dedicated service of the Trail and Sidewalk Task Force.
Recommended
Action:
Adopt a resolution of appreciation to the Trail and Sidewalk
Task Force
9. Reports from Officers, Boards, Committees
*a. Planning Commmission Minutes of January 6, 1999
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*b. Joint Planning Commission and Park and Rec Commission Minutes of December 2,
1999
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*c. Housing Authority Minutes of January 13, 1999
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
*d. Park and Rec Advisory Commission Retreat Minutes of January 13, 1999
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
5
*e. Vendor Claim Report
Action: By consent, accept report for filing
10. Unfinished Business
a. Board and Commission Appointment(s)-None
Action: Motion to appoint Board and Commission Member(s)
11. New Business
12. Miscellaneous
13. Claims, Appropriations, Contract Payments
a. Contract payments
14. Communications
15. Adjournment
6
Item # 4a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
February 1, 1999
1. Call to Order
Mayor Dorfman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
2. Presentations - None
3. Roll Call
The following Councilmembers were present at roll call: Jeff Jacobs, Chris Nelson, Sue Sanger,
Ron Latz, Jim Brimeyer, Robert Young and Mayor Gail Dorfman.
Also present were the City Manager (Mr. Meyer); City Attorney (Mr. Scott); Planning
Development Coordinator (Ms. Jeremiah); and City Clerk (Ms. Larsen)
4. Approval of Minutes
4a. City Council Meeting of January 19, 1998
With minor corrections, the minutes were approved as presented.
5. Approval of Agendas
a. Consent Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Latz, seconded by Councilmember Nelson, to approve the
consent agenda. The motion passed 7-0.
b. Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Jacobs, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the
agenda. The motion passed 7-0.
c. Resolutions and Ordinances
By consent, Council waived reading of resolutions and ordinances.
6. Public Hearings
6a. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - PUD Ordinance to allow density and height
modifications to be approved by PUD if consistent with Comprehensive Plan.
Case No. 99-01-ZA
Janet Jeremiah delivered an overview of the issue to be discussed. Following her presentation,
Mayor Dorfman closed the hearing with the right of Council to reopen at a future date.
7
Councilmember Sanger asked if we needed an ordinance amendment to ensure adequate open
space around taller buildings to retain the scale.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that open space requirements were already in place and that those could be
controlled through the PUD process as well.
Councilmember Nelson asked if consideration could be given to a taller building on the current
Norwest bank site for assisted living, which he felt would have minimal impact on land use in
terms of parking, etc.
Ms. Jeremiah said that any use at that location would be limited to 75 units per acre. If Council
wished to consider higher density, a new comp plan designation would be required.
Councilmember Brimeyer asked about current density levels at Park Shores assisted living in
order to compare relative scale.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that Park Shores is currently at 62 units which is above the limit for RC
zoning. Their current levels were approved prior to the 50 unit maximum being put into place.
The planned addition to Park Shores will bring the levels to 75 units per acre.
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson and seconded by Councilmember Jacobs to approve
First Reading of an ordinance amendment to the PUD Ordinance and set Second Reading for
February 16, 1999. Motion passed 7-0.
7. Petitions, Requests, Communications - None
8. Resolutions and Ordinances
8a. Second reading of an ordinance for an Official Map Amendment - Trail
Designation for Portion of Hutchinson Spur south of 36th Street
Case No. 98-40-OM
Ordinance # 2135-99
Motion to approve second reading, adopt the ordinance, approve the summary and authorize
publication was made by Councilmember Latz and seconded by Councilmember Jacobs. Motion
passed 7-0
9. Reports from Officers, Boards, Committees
a. Human Rights Commission Minutes of December 16, 1998
By consent, Council accepted report for filing
b. Vendor Claim Report
By consent, Council accepted report for filing
8
10. Unfinished Business
a. Appointment of Youth Member to Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission
Motion to appoint Ashley Tomoson to position of Youth Member with the Parks and Recreation
Advisory commission was made by Councilmember Nelson and Seconded by Councilmember
Sanger. Motion passed 7-0
11. Reports from Officers, Boards, Committees
11a. 1999 Animal Boarding Contract
By consent, Council approved a two year contract with Park Pet Hospital for animal boarding
services.
12. Miscellaneous - None
13. Claims, Appropriations, Contract Payments - None
14. Communications
15. Adjournment
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson and seconded by Councilmember Brimeyer, to adjourn
the meeting at 7:43. The motion passed 7-0.
City Clerk Mayor
9
Item # 4b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
January 25, 1998
The meeting convened at 6:08 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Jeff Jacobs, Chris Nelson, Sue Sanger, Ron Latz,
Robert Young, and Mayor Gail Dorfman.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Meyer); Deputy City Manager (Clint Pires); Director of
Community Development (Mr. Harmening); Planning Manager (Ms. Jeremiah); Planning
Associate (Ms. Peterson); Planning Coordinator (Ms. Erickson); Housing Coordinator (Ms.
Brownstein); Director of Inspections (Mr. Hoffman); Public Works Director (Mr. Rardin); and
Fire Chief (Mr. Gill).
1. Park Commons Meeting
Greg Esterman of Avalon Bay Communities and Richard Heapes of Cooper Carry were present.
Richard Heapes provided a background presentation to explain the types of projects his firm has
designed or researched which have influenced his recommendations and gave a slide presentation
of the Preliminary Master Plan for the Park Commons Phase One area.
The Council raised several issues related to the plan which included renaming 38th Street, traffic
circulation, pedestrian access, placement of stoplight on Excelsior Boulevard, density and
proposed use of office space. The Council was concerned about adequate access to both local
and metro transit.
Ms. Jeremiah explained the reason for the narrowing of Town Green.
Mayor Dorfman asked if there was any concern about scale as compared to the south side of
Excelsior Boulevard.
Ms. Jeremiah, Planning Manager stated that redevelopment of that area under the current zoning
limits was three stories, so this plan would be consistent. She indicated that higher density was
possible but construction costs were an issue.
Ms. Sanger desired to see the plan include capacity for bicycle traffic and access.
The Council also discussed safety and crime prevention and desired to see an active park edge
that created a lighting facade which preserved a public edge to park and the plans design for use
of space for public events by closing off streets and spilling over into the park.
The Council raised the issue of how much control did the City have who would be anchor and
regular tenants
Ms. Jeremiah stated that the City can specify some things such as maximum sizes, but can’t
designate specific use.
10
Mr. Heapes indicated the importance of creating convertible space which allowed for flexibility.
He stated that architectural design standards of high level of quality would set the tone and help
in the process.
Mayor Dorfman stated that the goal was to create a special place that was high quality, but not
too upscale for the community.
The Council believed that a range of architectural design was important and discussed provisions
for public art in the plan.
Ms. Jeremiah noted that amphitheater was off center which was actually more advantageous than
the original design for circulation of pedestrians.
Ms. Jeremiah explained that the next steps in the process would include completing housing
applications and determining phasing, development and financing schedules.
Mr. Esterman briefly commented on the greater phasing capability of this new plan.
Councilmember Sanger was interested in discussing the assisted housing component of Park
Commons Phase I in more detail as suggested in staff report.
Mayor Dorfman recommended updating the community on the plans. The Council agreed that
public notifications and open houses be planned to educate community on progress and phasing
of the development.
2. Updating St. Louis Park History
Councilmember Nelson provided some existing historical resources for the Council to review.
He suggested obtaining a writer to update materials to assist the Historical Society efforts to
update and collect materials. The Council discussed different ways to preserve the history of St.
Louis Park and asked Councilmember Nelson to direct the Historical Society to develop a
framework and plan to update St. Louis Park History.
3. Y2K-LMCIT Insurance & Planning Process
Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager presented a Y2K video and updated the Council on the current
City Y2K efforts as outlined in the staff report. The City Manager designated Clint Pires, Deputy
City Manager, as the City’s Y2K Coordinator. At the outset, staff made a decision to address
Y2K issues based on steps included in A Year 2000 Action Guide, produced by the League of
Minnesota Cities (LMC).
Councilmember Sanger asked about developing warranties. Mr. Meyer, City Manager stated that
the City will not provide warranties, but will answer with disclosures.
Councilmember Nelson asked if it was possible to set an date to simulate the Y2K phenomenon.
Mr. Pires stated that this was a possibility and Bob Gill, Fire Chief indicated that the County
would have a role in this.
11
Mr. Meyer, City Manager briefly commented on FEMA funds being set aside in the uninsured
loss fund as a special reserve for the purpose of covering Y2K liabilities that are not covered by
insurance or unanticipated by budget.
Councilmember Young questioned whether or not there was common knowledge available
regarding the areas that have been determined Y2K susceptible and have already been fixed.
Mr. Pires indicated that these Y2K-related items would be discussed at upcoming meeting with
the County. Mike Rardin, Public Works Director explained the current knowledge available
related to the City’s traffic signals.
The Council discussed the affect of the Y2K phenomenon on outside businesses and the possible
affect of these other systems failing and the City’s ability to respond with a contingency plan.
The Council requested that staff bring back to the Council a general policy recommendation that
addressed Y2K readiness which includes insurance coverage and a disclosure statement and
works within the parameters of the program produced by the League of Minnesota Cities.
4. Housing Rehab Programs
Ms. Brownstein, Housing Coordinator presented a staff report that outlined four specific
strategies proposed for the expansion of single family rehabilitation programs that supports the
City’s strong policies for preserving and strengthening the City’s housing stock outlined in
Vision St. Louis Park and the Economic Development Strategic Plan for Housing and Business.
The Council discussed the impact of the strategies on loan volume and a plan for advertising.
Staff will determine which strategies could be shared at upcoming Home Remodeling Fair.
Ms. Brownstein explained some proposed changes in administration and recommended that the
Council consider that the Housing Authority Board oversee the administration of the City’s
rehabilitation programs and indicated that the Board was interested in pursuing this expansion
opportunity.
The Council discussed the implication of this change on chain of command and recommended
that this proposed shift be monitored for a specific amount of time and then be evaluated.
Mr. Harmening explained the possibility of using a Housing Improvement District as a tool to
make capital improvements to communities and then those funds be paid back by a special
property tax and noted that this Statute required that the property owners request the use of this
tool.
5. Housing Authority Reorganization
Mr. Harmening, Community Development Director updated the Council on proposed
organizational changes in the Community Development Department relating to the structure of
the Housing Authority and overall housing functions undertaken by the City.
The Council discussed the cost implications of the changes and felt comfortable with the
proposed direction.
12
6. Comprehensive Plan - Proposed Land Use Change
Mr. Harmening, Community Development Director explained that there were a dozen property
areas that staff was suggesting for possible changes in land use in the Comprehensive Plan as
designated on the colored handouts. He indicated that Staff’s goal was to have draft of the
Comprehensive Plan ready by March for the required formal public review and comment period.
Ms. Erickson, Planning Coordinator presented staff report and requested Council input about
each area of the proposed subject areas for reguiding.
Subject Area #1 - The Council was not in favor of this change due to traffic issue. Subject Area
#2 - The Council was in favor of this change. Subject Area #3 - The Council was concerned
about impact of shifting density on the neighborhood, existing office space, and traffic. The
Council was not comfortable with the Comprehensive Plan changes to this subject area and
recommended further discussion on the issues of concern.
Subject Area #4 -The Council was concerned about need for a traffic signal and neighborhood
park land and desired to explore other areas for future development of NSP sub-station. Subject
Area #5- The Council was in favor of this change. Subject Area #6- The Council was in favor of
this change and recommended input from neighborhood. Subject Area #7- The Council agreed
that the land north of Minnetonka Blvd. and east of Texas (vacant parking lot) be reguided for
medium density as recommended by staff and the remaining property use changes of Subject
Area #7 be reviewed and studied. Subject Area #8- The Council was in favor of this change.
Subject Area #9- The Council was in favor of this change. Subject Area #10- The Council
discussed the height restrictions of the area and was in favor of this change. Subject Area #11-
The Council was in favor of this change.
7. Sex Offender Community Notification
The Council discussed the meeting regarding the Level 3 sex offender notification on
Wednesday, January 20th and the response of residents. The Council discussed whether or not to
broadcast the meeting on cable. Councilmember Nelson’s concern about broadcasting the
meeting on cable was that the material would be offensive since there is no control of who will
watch it. Councilmember Sanger recommended adding a public service announcement before or
after the broadcast to set the context of the topic. The Council agreed to air the meeting in its
entirety to further educate the community.
8. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 11:00 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
13
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 6a
Meeting of February 16, 1999
6a Public Hearing - Change of Liquor License from On-Sale 3.2% Malt Liquor
to On-sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales
Texa-Tonka Lanes - 8200 Minnetonka Blvd
Hearing to consider upgrading the license for Texa-Tonka Lanes from the On-sale
3.2% Malt Liquor license to On-sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales..
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve the license
change.
Background:
The City received a request and application for On-sale Intoxicating Liquor and Sunday Sales for
Texa-Tonka Lanes. They currently hold a 3.2 Malt Liquor license for 1999. The owner
requested the license change to enhance the beverage service for their current clients and is not
intended as an independent draw.
Analysis:
City Ordinance Section 13-320, item 14 permits Sunday Sales of liquor within a bowling center.
The City has issued On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor licenses with Sunday Sales for other bowling
centers in the past.
If approved by council the current 3.2% Malt Liquor license will become null and void as the
Intoxicating Liquor license will be all inclusive of liquor sales.
Police Report:
The Police Department conducted a criminal background investigation pursuant to liquor license
guidelines and concluded there was no reason to deny the upgrade.
All documentation is on file in the Inspections Department.
Prepared by: Cindy Kaiser, Licensing Representative
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
14
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 6b
Meeting of February 16, 1999
6b. Public Hearing for Temporary On-sale Intoxicating Liquor License on
February 20, 1999
Jewish Community Center - 4330 So. Cedar Lake Road
This hearing considers granting the Jewish Community Center a one-day license for
On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing. Motion to approve the
Temporary On-sale Liquor License for the Jewish Community
Center.
Background:
The City has received an application from the Jewish Community Center (JCC) for a Temporary
On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License. The request is for a one-day license effective on February
20, 1999. The JCC has been granted liquor licenses in previous years for their annual Chai Ball
fundraiser.
Police Report:
The Police Department conducted a criminal background investigation pursuant to liquor license
guidelines and concluded there was no reason to deny the the license.
All documentation is on file in the Inspections Department.
Prepared by: Cindy Kaiser, Licensing Representative
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, Director of Inspections
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
15
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8a
Meeting of February 16, 1999
8a. Request to approve attached Public Tree Removal Policy.
Council consideration of Public Tree Removal Policy
Recommended
Action:
Staff recommends Council approval of the Public Tree Removal
policy.
Background:
In January, the City Council reviewed a draft Public Tree Policy at one of the study sessions.
Council direction at that time was to tighten up the policy so that it was evident to residents that
the City of St. Louis Park believes strongly in preserving trees. Anyone removing a tree in a
publicly owned space will have to obtain a permit from the City Forester. The policy indicates
that the City prohibits the removal of trees for the following: driveway aprons and other
construction, view and vista enhancement, and clearance for commercial signs. However, the
policy does allow for special circumstances to be reviewed by the City Forester.. This policy will
help staff to enforce the past tree preservation practices and limit the number of public trees that
are removed in the City.
Attachments: Public Tree Removal Policy
Prepared by: Cindy S. Walsh, Director of Parks and Recreation
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
16
PUBLIC TREE REMOVAL POLICY
Trees that are growing on boulevards, on the public right-of-way of streets or alleys, on
easements behind sidewalks, on park land, on City-owned property and on other municipal
public property may need to be removed by the City of St. Louis Park under special
circumstances. These special circumstances include trees that are either diseased, dead and/or
declining, structurally hazardous, of an undesirable species or poses a threat to the health and
well being of the public. The City Forester, acting in the best interest of the public, determines
whether a tree must be removed. If this determination is made, the tree is usually identified with
orange paint. This serves as public notification that removal is pending.
Infrastructure Conflicts
Trees in the urban forest can conflict with the infrastructure of the City of St. Louis Park.
The most frequent examples are listed below along with the Forestry Division’s corresponding
procedure.
a) Sewer Lines: Tree roots do not seek our sewer lines and grow in them causing a blockage.
Instead they enter a sewer line through a defect. Therefore, a sewer line that is blocked with
tree roots is the result of a defective sewer line. The repair of sewer lines is the responsibility
of the property owner. The Forestry Division does not remove trees because of blocked
sewer lines, with one exception. That exception is when the location of the tree prevents the
repair of the sewer line. It is the property owners responsibility to prove that the tree is
obstructing the repair of the sewer line. In this situation, the property owner must present a
copy of the utility connections permit from the Inspection Services Department as proof of
proposed sewer repairs. The property owner may also be required to provide compensation
to the City of St. Louis Park for the value of the tree and the cost of the removal. The City
Forester shall have the authority to negotiate the rate and amount of compensation. After
these requirements are met, the Forestry Division will facilitate the removal of the tree of
concern.
b) Sidewalks: The Forestry Division does not remove trees for the purpose of sidewalk repair.
In situations where tree roots are lifting a sidewalk, it is the property owners responsibility to
repair the sidewalk. Enforcement of this procedure is the responsibility of the Public Works
Department.
c) Driveway Aprons and Other Construction: Requests for tree removal in order to
accommodate the construction of driveway aprons or other projects will be reviewed on an
individual basis. The City Forester shall have the authority to deny a request for removal if it
is in the best interest of the public to preserve the tree. In the event that removal is
permissible in order to accommodate the construction project, then a current building permit
is required, and compensation may be required to the City for the value of the tree and/or the
cost of the removal. The City Forester shall have the authority to negotiate the rate and
amount of compensation. After these requirements are met, the City Forester will facilitate
the removal of the tree of concern.
17
d) Views or Vistas: The City will not remove trees in order to provide or enhance a view or
vista.
e) Commercial Signs: The City will not remove trees in order to provide visual clearance for
commercial or other signs for advertising purposes.
f) Removal Beneath Utility Lines: Whenever a utility company wishes to remove a public tree,
permission must be obtained from the City Forester. Trees that are currently growing beneath
overhead utility lines and interfere with them may need to be removed by the utility company
in order to preserve the function and integrity of the lines. The City Forester may want to
have trees removed from beneath overhead utility lines if it is considered in the best interest
of the public to do so. Such trees are typically of little or no value due to repeated pruning
for utility line clearance. In these cases the City Forester shall have the authority to enter into
an agreement with the utility company whereby the utility company removes the tree and
pays for its replacement. In situations where a new utility line is proposed and will directly
interfere with existing trees, alternative routes for the utility line will be explored. It if is
determined that a tree must be removed to accommodate such a request, then the utility
company shall provide compensation for the value of a removed tree and/or the cost of the
removal. The City Forester shall have the authority to negotiate the rate and amount of
compensation. After these requirements are met, the City Forester will facilitate the removal
of the tree of concern.
Tree Removal Permits
Requests for a tree removal permit must be made to the City Forester. The City Forester
shall have the authority to deny a permit request if it is in the best interest of the public to do so.
In the event that a removal permit is permissible, the property owner must compensate the City
before the request can be accommodated. This compensation must be for the value of the tree to
be removed. The City Forester shall have the authority to negotiate the rate and amount of
compensation. If the tree can be transplanted to a new public location then the property owner
may be required to arrange and pay for the transplanting as specified and coordinated by the City
Forester. Permitted removals or transplants must be done contractually by a company that is
licensed by the City to do tree work. The cost of a removal shall be the responsibility of the
permit holder. After these requirements are met, the City Forester may issue a permit for the
requested removal.
18
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8b
Meeting of February 16, 1999
8b. City Engineer’s Report: Watermain replacement on Ford Road from Ford
Lane to the north frontage road of I-394 - Project No. 99-01) and roadway mill
and overlay - (Project No. 97-22).
This report considers the replacement of watermain in Ford Road from Ford Lane
to the north frontage road of I-394 and a roadway mill and overlay.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution accepting this report,
establishing Project Nos. 99-01 and 97-22, ordering Project Nos.
99-01 and 97-22, approving plans and specifications, and
authorizing receipt of bids.
Background: The watermain in Shelard Park was originally constructed in 1970. Over the
years the watermain has experienced numerous breaks primarily due to the high acidity of the
groundwater. The high acidity slowly eats away the bolts and pipe causing a loss of structural
integrity. This project is the final project of several projects to replace all the watermain in
Shelard Park over a four (4) year period. In addition to the watermain replacement it is
recommended the roadway be milled and a new bituminous overlay be placed. The roadway still
has structural integrity but has surface wear and rutting.
Design Considerations: Proposed Projects 99-01 and 97-22 provide for the replacement of the
existing 12 inch ductile iron watermain in Ford Road with polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe. The
use of PVC pipe is recommended due to its immunity to corrosion from acidic soil/ groundwater
conditions. Existing hydrant connections will be replaced with PVC and all valves will be coated
with protective coatings. Water service connections to the City’s watermain will be coordinated
with the property owners.
The roadway mill and overlay is proposed to begin at the completion of the watermain
replacement. The proposed project includes milling three (3) inches off the existing roadway
surface and its replacement with new bituminous.
Financial Considerations: The estimated project cost for the watermain replacement and the
bituminous mill and overlay is $421,000. Funding for the watermain replacement is from the
1999 Water Utility Infrastructure Fund. Funding for the bituminous mill and overlay is from
General Obligation Bond Revenue. The Finance Department is currently planning to present a
request to the Council sometime during the first half of 1999 to sell General Obligation Bonds to
be used for a variety of purposes, including this project. If the Council will not support the sale
of Bonds later this year, then the mill and overlay project should not be authorized and built as
there are no other funds available for this project at this time.
19
Following is a summary of the estimated costs and revenue sources:
Estimated Costs:
Construction $ 342,000
Contingency (10%) 34,000
Subtotal $ 376,000
Engineering/Administrative (12%) $ 45,000
TOTAL $ 421,000
Revenue Sources
1999 Water Utility Infrastructure Fund $ 292,000
General Obligation Bond Revenue 129,000
TOTAL $ 421,000
Proposed Improvement Timetable:
City Engineer’s Report to City Council February 16, 1999
Advertisement for Bids March 1999
Bid Opening April 1999
Bid Tab Report to City Council April 1999
Construction Time Frame June - August 1999
Note: Staff will meet with the affected property owners prior to bidding the project to inform
them of the proposed construction and work out access issues that might occur during
construction.
Feasibility: The project, as proposed herein, is necessary, cost effective, and feasible under the
conditions noted and at the costs estimated.
Attachments: Resolution
Map
Prepared By: Carlton B. Moore/Michael P. Rardin, Public Works
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
N:\GROUP\PW\AGENDA\CER9901.doc
20
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT,
ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 99-01 AND 97-22
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 99-01 AND 97-22
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENT NOS. 99-01 AND 97-22
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
City Engineer related to the replacement of watermain in Ford Road from Ford Lane to the north
frontage road of I-394 and roadway mill and overlay.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The City Engineer’s Report regarding the replacement of watermain in Ford Road from Ford
Lane to the north frontage road of I-394 and roadway mill and overlay under Project Nos. 99-01
and 97-22 is hereby accepted.
2. The proposed project, designated as Project Nos. 99-01 and 97-22 is hereby established.
3. Project Nos. 99-01 and 97-22 is hereby ordered.
4. The plans and specifications for the making of the improvement as prepared under the direction
of the Director of Public Works are approved.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official newspaper
and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of said improvement
under said approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than
twenty one (21) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City Clerk, and that
no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a
cashier’s check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five (5) percent of the
amount of the bid.
6. The bids shall be tabulated by the Director of Public Works who shall report his tabulation and
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 16, 1999
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
21
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8c
Meeting of February 16, 1999
8c. City Engineer’s Report: Street Rehabilitation, Crack Repair, Random Curb
and Gutter Repair, and Sealcoat on Parkdale Drive from Park Place
Boulevard to Trunk Highway 100 - Project No. 98-12.
This report considers the rehabilitation of Parkdale Drive with crack repair, random
curb and gutter repair, and sealcoat.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution accepting this report,
establishing Project No. 98-12, ordering Project No. 98-12,
approving plans and specifications, and authorizing receipt of
bids.
Discussion: Parkdale Drive was originally constructed in 1978. Although the road has provided
good service to the area, it is now showing sign of wear that can appropriately be addressed
through a rehabilitation project. After reviewing the road conditions and rehabilitation options,
staff recommends random curb and gutter repair, crack repair (mill and patch), and a sealcoat. It
is anticipated that the rehabilitation project will extend the life of the road by 6 to 8 years.
Included in this project is the removal of the railroad crossing of Parkdale Drive along with the
reconstruction of the road at the crossing.
Financial Considerations: The rehabilitation project is proposed to be funded by General
Obligation Bond Revenue and the Public Works Operations Division budget. The estimated cost
of the project is $36,000, $8,000 for the sealcoat work and $28,000 for the balance of the work.
The Finance Department is currently planning to present a request to the Council sometime
during the first half of 1999 to sell General Obligation Bonds to be used for a variety of purposes,
including this project. If the Council will not support the sale of Bonds later this year, then this
project should not be authorized and built as there are no other funds available for this project at
this time.
Following is a summary of the estimated costs and revenue sources:
Estimated Costs:
Construction $ 28,000
Contingency (15%) 4,000
Subtotal $ 32,000
Engineering/Administrative (12%) $ 4,000
TOTAL $ 36,000
22
Revenue Sources
1999 Operations Division Budget $ 8,000
General Obligation Bond Revenue 28,000
TOTAL $ 36,000
Construction Timetable: It is proposed that the majority of this work would be constructed in
June of 1999 followed by the sealcoat in July which would be included in the City wide sealcoat
contract.
Feasibility: The project, as proposed herein, is necessary, cost effective, and feasible under the
conditions noted and at the costs estimated.
Attachments: Resolution
Map
Prepared By: Carlton B. Moore/Michael P. Rardin, Public Works
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
N:\GROUP\PW\AGENDA\CER9812.doc
23
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE CITY ENGINEER’S REPORT,
ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 98-12
ORDERING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 98-12
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENT NOS. 98-12
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
City Engineer related to the replacement of watermain in Ford Road from Ford Lane to the north
frontage road of I-394 and roadway mill and overlay.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The City Engineer’s Report regarding the replacement of watermain in Ford Road from Ford
Lane to the north frontage road of I-394 and roadway mill and overlay under Project Nos. 99-01
and 97-22 is hereby accepted.
2. The proposed project, designated as Project Nos. 99-01 and 97-22 is hereby established.
3. Project Nos. 99-01 and 97-22 is hereby ordered.
4. The plans and specifications for the making of the improvement as prepared under the direction
of the Director of Public Works are approved.
5. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official newspaper
and in the Construction Bulletin an advertisement for bids for the making of said improvement
under said approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than
twenty one (21) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by the City Clerk, and that
no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied by a
cashier’s check, bid bond, or certified check payable to the City for five (5) percent of the
amount of the bid.
6. The bids shall be tabulated by the Director of Public Works who shall report his tabulation and
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 16, 1999
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
24
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8d
Meeting of February 16, 1999
8d. Zoning Ordinance Amendment - PUD Ordinance
Case No. 99-01-ZA
Second Reading of a Zoning Ordinance amendment to allow density and height
modifications to be approved by PUD as long as they are consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve second reading, adopt ordinance, approve
summary and authorize publication.
Background:
At its meeting on February 1, 1999, the City Council held a public hearing on an ordinance
amendment to the PUD Ordinance to allow density and height modifications to be approved as
long as they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Following its review of the staff report
and recommendation, the Council approved first reading of the ordinance and set second reading
for February 16, 1999.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of second reading of the ordinance, adoption of the ordinance,
approval of a summary ordinance and authorization of publication of the summary ordinance.
Attachments:
Proposed Ordinance
Proposed Summary Ordinance
Prepared by: Janice Loftus, Administrative Secretary, Communitiy Development
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
1304/N
25
ORDINANCE NO.______
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY
AMENDING SECTION 14:6-7.4.C.
(TABLE 6-7.A)
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Findings
Sec. 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 99-01-ZA)
Sec. 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 14:6-7.4.C, Table 6-7.A Building
Height and Density are hereby amended as follows:
Table 6-7.A
Allowable Modifications in PUDS
Ordinance Requirement Maximum Modification Allowed
Building Height 35% increase or as consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan
Density 10% increase or as consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan
Sec. 3. The contents of Planning Case File 99-01-ZA are hereby entered into and made part
of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Sec.4. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 16, 1999
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
26
99-01/N/res
27
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO._____________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING BY
AMENDING SECTION 14:6-7.4.C.
(TABLE 6-7.A)
This ordinance states that the PUD Ordinance shall be amended to allow density and height
modifications to be approved as long as they are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council Feburary 16, 1999
Gail Dorfman /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: February 24, 1999
28
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #8e
Meeting of February 16, 1999
8e. Resolution Stating City Goals Regarding The Year 2000 Problem And
Appointing Year 2000 Coordinator
Adoption of document stating City goals with respect to Year 2000 issues,
appointing the Deputy City Manager as Y2K Coordinator; and adopting “Year 2000
Readiness Disclosure” statement.
Recommended
Action:
Adopt the attached resolution stating City goals regarding the
Year 2000 problem and appointing the City’s Year 2000
coordinator. Approve the attached “Year 2000 Readiness
Disclosure” statement.
Background: At its January 25, 1999 study session, the City Council reviewed and discussed the
staff report regarding the Year 2000 (Y2K) phenomenon. This report described potential
problems as they relate to City operations; an action plan staff is using to identify, address, and
test Y2K-related applications; and an approach to contingency planning for Y2K-related
problems that may arise. Council directed staff to apply for Year 2000 expanded coverage
available through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, and staff is in the process of
doing so. Also as part of that presentation, staff alerted Council to expect submission (or
potential submission) of the following items:
• budget modifications related to Y2K-remediation (part of 2000 budget process)
• adoption of a resolution describing City Y2K-related goals and appointing a Y2K coordinator
• adoption of a City “Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure” statement
Attached to this report is a resolution that clearly states City goals with respect to Year 2000
issues, and appointing the Deputy City Manager as the City’s Y2K Coordinator. These goals are
consistent with actions described to Council in the report reviewed on January 25.
Also attached is a City “Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure” statement. Pursuant to Public Law
105-271, this statement allows for private and public sector entities to share information to
address Y2K problems without threat of legal action based on the information provided. The City
has already received this statement from some firms. The City’s statement is available to anyone
who requests it, and will be of particular interest to vendors, businesses, and residents. It will be
sent to all that request information on the City’s response to Y2K.
Recommendation: It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution stating City
goals regarding the Year 2000 problem and appointing the City’s Year 2000 coordinator. It is
further recommended that Council approve the attached “Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure”
statement. The City Attorney has reviewed the resolution and statement.
Prepared by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
29
RESOLUTION NO._______
RESOLUTION STATING CITY GOALS REGARDING THE YEAR 2000
PROBLEM AND APPOINTING YEAR 2000 COORDINATOR
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park recognizes that the Year 2000 problem involves
more than just a computer issue; and
WHEREAS, the City recognizes that all of its departments and services may be affected by
the Year 2000 problem; and
WHEREAS, the Year 2000 problem is a top priority for all City operations; and
WHEREAS, the City is committed to identify, address and resolve potential problems
created by Year 2000 issues and to make its best effort to ensure continuity of essential City
services; and
WHEREAS, the City’s efforts to minimize the potential impact of the Year 200 problem
will likely involve multiple City operations and outside organizations on which the City depends
to deliver essential City services; and
WHEREAS, the City believes that coordination of all persons working on the Year 2000
problem on behalf of the City is essential to the efficiency and effectiveness of the City’s overall
Year 2000 effort; and
WHEREAS, the City pledges to create contingency and community preparedness plans to
reduce the possible effects of computer and operational system failures throughout the
community; and
WHEREAS, the League of Minnesota Cities has requested that cities designate a contact
person to receive information on the Year 2000 problem:
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park
hereby appoints Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager, to serve as the City’s Year 2000 Project
Coordinator.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of St. Louis Park shall make a good faith
effort to identify and mitigate the effects of the Year 2000 problem as described herein, and
respond to problems that arise as a result of the Year 2000 problem using contingency plans and
the best judgment of City staff.
30
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 16, 1999
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
31
Year 2000 Readiness Disclosure Statement
February 1999
Information contained in this communication relates to the City of St. Louis Park’s Year 2000
efforts. The disclosure of this information is intended to serve as a Year 2000 Readiness
Disclosure Statement pursuant the Year 2000 Information and Readiness Disclosure Act, Public
Law 105-271 (“Act”).
The City of St. Louis Park (“City”) has received a number of requests for information regarding
what the City is doing to ensure that potential Year 2000 problems are being addressed. Proper
Year 2000 processing in automated systems is required for continued provision of many essential
City services.
For purposes of the Readiness Disclosure, the City defines “Year 2000 Processing”, in
accordance with the Act, to mean the processing (including calculating, comparing, sequencing,
displaying, or storing), transmitting, or receiving of data from, into, and between the 20th and 21st
centuries, and during the years 1999 and 2000, and leap year calculations.
The City has been and will continue to assess potential problem areas and make modifications,
where needed, and thereby make its best good faith effort to ensure that its computer and other
automated systems have Year 2000 Processing capability. The City has already made significant
progress in assessing and correcting Year 2000 problems, and has appointed a Year 2000
Coordinator and staff team to complete Year 2000 corrections. At this time, the City does not
anticipate that the Year 2000 will cause significant disruption in its ability to provide services or
to conduct business with vendors that are also ensuring their own Year 2000 processing
capability. The City’s Year 2000 efforts also address the activities and status of its own service
and supply providers, as well as interfaces with financial and other institutions, on which the City
depends to provide services to the community.
Additional Year 2000 efforts include communication with residents, businesses, and other
community institutions to emphasize their need to check and remediate potential Year 2000
problems for which they are responsible. Finally, the City is preparing contingency plans to
address service delivery problems that may result from Year 2000-related problems in City
systems, as well as community-wide problems that may occur in systems not owned by the City.
At this time, given the work that has been done thus far, the City anticipates completion of Year
2000-related assessment, correction, testing, and contingency planning in June 1999.
32
For further information, contact the City’s Year 2000 Coordinator:
Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
Telephone: 612/924-2517
Fax: 612/924-2170
E-Mail: cpires@stlouispark.org
33
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8f*
Meeting of February 16, 1999
*8f. Resolution Supporting Housing Authority Application to Minnesota Housing
Finance Agency (MHFA) under the Single Family Combined Programs
Request for Proposals.
If the application is funded by MHFA, a program will be established to provide
financing for improvements needed to resolve code violations, including exterior
maintenance violations on single family homes.
Recommended
Action:
Move to approve a resolution supporting the Housing
Authority’s application to the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency under the December 1998 Single Family Combined
Programs Request for Proposals
Background:
At its study session on January 25, 1999, staff discussed four new proposed housing
rehabilitation strategies with the City Council. One of these strategies involved the development
of a program to assist in addressing exterior code violations. The funding source identified was a
MHFA grant and local matching sources.
In its application to MHFA, the Housing Authority will address the following:
Proposal:
• Apply for a grant to establish a revolving loan fund to provide incentives to
homeowners to correct code violations
• Funds used for improvements to house or garage exteriors; demolition of substandard
garages or fences; interior code violations; and other appropriate improvements to
improve appearance and safety
• Up to $4,000 will be provided to eligible homeowners as a grant, deferred loan, or
repayable loan with a maximum loan term of 7 years
Financing: Request for $80,000 from the Community Revitalization Fund for the creation of
a code compliance incentive program for troubled properties. The City will
provide a $40,000 match using monies from the Housing Rehabilitation Fund and
$40,000 in Community Development Block Grant funds previously allocated by
the City Council for single family housing rehabilitation. Please note that the
MHFA program requires a one to one match. This was not staff’s original
34
understanding. As such, the $40,000 in CDBG funds will be used to supplement
the Housing Rehab Funds.
Impact: 20 grants or loans annually
City Goals:
• Encourage maintenance of homes (Vision St. Louis Park)
• Strengthen the city’s single family maintenance and rehabilitation programs
(Strategic Plan)
• Strengthen housing inspections, licensing requirements and zoning ordinances to
encourage well-maintained housing (Vision St. Louis Park, Strategic Plan)
• Strengthen neighborhoods and neighborhood amenities to encourage residents to stay
and reinvest in St. Louis Park (Strategic Plan)
Administration:
• Contract with an outside agency for administration
• Community Development Dept. responsible for contract management
• Community Development and Inspections will work jointly on marketing and referral
of potential program participants
• Housing Authority Board will oversee/monitor the implementation of the program.
During the City Council’s review of this and other programs on January 25, staff also discussed
the concept of having the Housing Authority Board take on the responsibility of overseeing these
programs. The Council concurred that this was acceptable. Thus, the Housing Authority is
proposed to be the applicant for the MHFA grant funds.
Next Steps:
Staff will submit an application to MHFA on or before February 18, 1999. Awards will be made
and announced in May 1999, and we expect to have this program implemented by June 1999.
Attachments:
Proposed Resolution
Prepared By: Joanna Brownstein, Housing Coordinator, 924-2196
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
35
RESOLUTION ______
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK’S
APPLICATION TO MHFA UNDER THE DECEMBER 1998 SINGLE FAMILY
COMBINED PROGRAMS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park has identified the preservation and rehabilitation of
its housing stock as a high priority in both Vision St. Louis Park and the Economic Development
Strategic Plan for Housing and Business; and
WHEREAS, in its mission statement, in conjunction with Vision St. Louis Park, the
Housing Authority of St. Louis Park works to integrate policies and programs that enhance the
livability and strong sense of community in St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has agreed to allow the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park
to begin to oversee the City’s single family housing rehabilitation programs; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires the Housing Authority of St. Louis Park to make
application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency for resources to support single family
housing rehabilitation;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council supports the Housing
Authority of St. Louis Park in its submission of an application to the Minnesota Housing Finance
Agency under the December 1998 Single Family Combined Programs Request for Proposals.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 16, 1999
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
36
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8g*
Meeting of February 16, 1999
*8g. Hennepin County Municipal Recycling Grant Application
This request is for authorization to apply to Hennepin County for a grant to fund the
City’s curbside recycling program.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing application
for a Hennepin County grant to fund the City’s curbside
recycling program.
Background: Since 1988 the City has received a grant from Hennepin County for the support of
the residential curbside recycling program that serves all single family through fourplex
residential structures. From the beginning through 1992, the County’s recycling grant program
provided reimbursement of eligible costs between 50% and 80% based on the amount of
recyclable material diverted from the waste stream. St. Louis Park always received the
maximum reimbursement of 80% of program costs, or about $1.75 per household per month.
In 1993 and again in 1994, the county changed its program to provide an entitlement of $1.75 per
household per month regardless of the amount of recyclable material diverted from the waste
stream.
The County’s current funding policy (grant program) covers the period from January 1, 1995
through December 31, 1999, and provides for the proportional distribution of SCORE funds,
which the County receives from the State of Minnesota. SCORE (Select Committee On
Recycling and the Environment) was established by Governor Perpich to provide a funding
source for solid waste programs throughout Minnesota. SCORE funds are derived from a 6.5%
tax on garbage collection and disposal fees. These funds are then distributed to Counties for
solid waste programs, particularly recycling collection.
Hennepin County’s share of SCORE funds is approximately $3 million per year. This is divided
proportionally between Cities in the County based on the number of households that have
curbside recycling service, St. Louis Park’s share is about $110,000.
In 1995 the City authorized a grant application and agreement for the duration of this program.
Since that time, staff has prepared grant applications and agreements for the Mayor’s signature
annually. In December of 1997, Hennepin County informed staff that a Council Resolution
authorizing each application and agreement would be necessary. This report and request is based
on that change by Hennepin County.
37
Summary: Attached to this report is a resolution authorizing the application to Hennepin
County for a grant to fund the City’s curbside recycling program. The grant application and the
County funding Policy are attached for Council for information purposes only.
Attachments: Resolution
1998 Municipal Recycling Final Report / 1999 Grant Application (on file in
City Clerk’s office)
Hennepin County Residential Recycling Funding Policy (on file in City
Clerk’s office)
Prepared by: Mike Roth, Public Works Administrative Assistant
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
38
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPLICATION FOR A GRANT AND EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK AND HENNEPIN
COUNTY FOR FUNDING ASSISTANCE FOR RESIDENTIAL CURBSIDE
RECYCLING PROGRAM
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statute 115A.552, Counties shall ensure that
residents have an opportunity to recycle; and
WHEREAS, Hennepin County Ordinance 13 requires each City to implement a recycling
program to enable the County to meet its recycling goals; and
WHEREAS, the County has adopted a funding assistance policy for source separated
recyclables to distribute funds to Cities for the development and implementation of waste
reduction and recycling programs; and
WHEREAS, to be eligible to receive these County funds, Cities must meet the
conditions set forth in the funding policy; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that the City Council authorizes the submittal of the 1999 Hennepin County
grant application for municipal source separated recyclables and that the Mayor, City Manager
and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota an agreement in its entirety which covers the furnishing of a recycling program
during 1999.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that as a condition to receive funds under the Hennepin
County funding assistance policy, the City agrees to implement a waste reduction and recycling
program as committed to by its submission of the 1999 Hennepin County recycling grant
application and that the City will use such County funds for the limited purpose of implementing
the City’s waste reduction and recycling program and that the City Clerk is hereby directed to file
a certified copy of this resolution with the agreement with the Hennepin County Contract
Compliance Officer.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 16, 1999
City Manager Mayor
Attest
City Clerk
39
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 8h*
Meeting of February 16, 1999
*8h. Resolution of Appreciation to Trail and Sidewalk Task Force
The Council is requested to adopt a resolution of commendation and appreciation
for the dedicated service of the Trail and Sidewalk Task Force.
Recommended
Action:
Adopt a resolution of appreciation to the Trail and Sidewalk
Task Force
Background:
A thirteen member task force, which includes residents and representatives of the Planning and
Park & Recreation Commissions, has been working on a study of the trail and sidewalk
infrastructure in the City. The task force members have displayed their commitment to the
greater interests of the City. They have worked diligently in helping to create a plan that
identifies locations for citywide and neighborhood sidewalks, pedestrian and bicycle trails, and
street crossings. In addition, the task force members helped to rank specific segments and
crossings according to priority.
Staff believes it is appropriate to recognize the efforts of the task force members. Copies of the
resolution will be distributed to each task force member. The names of the task force members
are listed in the attached resolution.
Attachments:
• Proposed Resolution
Prepared by: Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator, 924-2574
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
1306/N
40
RESOLUTION NO.________
RESOLUTION OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL
In Recognition of Dedicated Service
Toward Planning the Future of the
City of St. Louis Park
As Members of the Trail and Sidewalk Task Force
The City Council Hereby Provides This
Resolution of Commendation and Appreciation To
GRETCHEN MOFFET DAWN WRIGHT
MARC BERG KEN GOTHBERG
JULIE HART BARB PERSON
DAVE CARLSON JOHN THWING
STEVEN MUELLER ANGIE HEITZMAN
JEAN OLSON MARY KLUEH
JIM LANENBERG
Adopted by the City Council on February 16, 1999
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
41
Item # 9a*
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
JANUARY 6, 1999 --7:00 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Dennis Morris, Michael Garelick, Ken Gothberg, Jerry Timian
Michelle Bissonnette, Paul Carver (arrived at 7:10 p.m.)
MEMBERS ABSENT: Sally Velick
STAFF PRESENT: Janet Jeremiah, Janice Loftus, Sacha Peterson
1. Call to Order - Roll Call
Chair Morris called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes of December 16, 1998
Mr. Garelick moved approval of the minutes of December 16, 1998 and the motion
passed on a vote of 5-0 with Bissonnette, Garelick, Gothberg, Morris, and Timian voting
in favor.
3. Public Hearings: None
4. Old Business
i. Case No. 98-41-CUP - Request of Frauenshuh Companies (PNMC Holdings) for
a special permit to permit the construction of a two story bank & dental building
for property zoned C-2 General Commercial located at 4951 - 4959 Excelsior
Boulevard. (deferred 12-2-98)
Sacha Peterson, Planning Associate, presented a staff report and traffic study
details. The Planning Commission delayed consideration of the request from the
December 2nd meeting in order to consider the results of a traffic study regarding
the impact of the proposal on adjacent local streets. The traffic study’s conclusion
is that there would be minimal traffic increase and levels of service on local
streets would not be affected. She concluded that staff recommends approval
subject to five conditions outlined in the staff report.
Mr. Gothberg asked staff to clarify traffic patterns on Vallacher Avenue on Figure
5 of the traffic study.
Ms. Jeremiah clarified that the traffic figures for the west side of Vallacher
Avenue are actually on the private bank property.
42
Mr. Garelick expressed his concern about the impact of the amount of projected
traffic flowing through the neighborhood.
Ms. Peterson explained figure 6 of the traffic study outlining the increase of traffic
as a result of the development by comparing the number of current total daily trips
and the number of total daily trips projected as noted below with an increase of
10% overall including a background increase that is not attributable to the bank.
• Quentin would increase from 1150 trips current to 1340 projected.
• East on 40th Street would increase from 1050 trips current to 1120 projected.
• East on Vallacher would increase from 500 trips current to 540 projected.
• West on 40th would increase from 1050 trips current to 1175 projected.
Mr. Garelick asked if the increase was within a specific time frame.
Ms. Peterson indicated that the daily trips were defined as within a 24 hour period.
Ms. Peterson noted that the worst case scenario during rush hour would result in
an additional car every 2 1/2 minutes on 40th Street.
Mr. Garelick asked if the results of the traffic studies are typically conservative or
close to projections.
Ms. Jeremiah indicated that projections in the past have tended to be low since
there was background traffic that kept increasing as people increased the number
of cars they owned and more families have both parents working. More recently,
projections have been higher since the background increases have been factored
in. Therefore, the projection should be more accurate.
Mr. Garelick stated that he believes the projections seem low for the amount of
potential people working in the building and asked if there were any projections
about how many people are going to be employed within the building.
Ms. Peterson indicated that the traffic study was based on amount of square
footage for a dental building and bank drive-through.
Mr. Timian stated he is concerned with the drive-through traffic.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that the design needs to be considered and there are always
concerns with drive-throughs. She indicated that one of the issues raised while
going through the Park Commons redevelopment process is to ensure that
pedestrians are considered and accommodated which was not always done in the
past (e.g. near the McDonalds). Staff is trying to balance the needs of pedestrians
and automobiles in these plans by narrowing the drive through to one lane where
43
it crosses the Excelsior Boulevard sidewalk, by requiring sidewalks through the
parking areas and by requiring landscape buffering of the use and a future wall if
Quentin is realigned.
Mr. Timian stated that he believes that the drive-through is not pedestrian
friendly.
Chair Morris asked staff for a clarification of Condition “e” in the staff report
analysis section for drive-throughs relative to the location of the exits.
Ms. Peterson explained the location of the drive throughs and the distance to the
exits.
Chair Morris referred to Page 6 which states that the proposal is consistent with
Comprehensive Plan goals with regard to relocation of existing businesses, and
asked if this is true.
Ms. Peterson indicated that Norwest Bank currently exists north of Excelsior
Boulevard on Park Center Boulevard and Ms. Jeremiah indicated that Park Dental
is part of the existing Health System development.
Chair Morris asked staff how relocation of the bank potentially facilitates
additional senior housing units.
Ms. Peterson indicated that with the relocation, the property owner of the Park
Shore Place senior housing development could expand onto the existing Norwest
Bank site.
Chair Morris stated that he can’t envision increasing the amount of traffic on
Excelsior Boulevard. He reviewed the definition of limited commercial area and
stated that he believes that a five lane drive-through is not compatible with the
Comprehensive Plan. (Note: The limited commercial reference was part of a
previous redevelopment plan for the area that was replaced by the Park Commons
Concept Plan). He said he is in favor of having a dental building and bank, but not
in favor of a five lane drive-through because he doesn’t see a good traffic
circulation.
Mr. Garelick stated he believes this area is a prototype of what a neighborhood is
like in St. Louis Park. He reviewed the current neighborhood feeling in the area,
and is strongly concerned about the increase of traffic adversely impacting the
neighborhood.
Mr. Gothberg concurred with Mr. Garelick.
44
Lee Owens, 4417 Quentin Avenue, asked what SRF considered adverse traffic
affects.
Ms. Peterson explained that the study determined that the actual level of traffic on
the local streets would continue to be a “Level A”, the same level of service which
currently exists and is the best possible traffic designation.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that much higher traffic volumes than those predicted in the
study are often seen on St. Louis Park streets with residential development.
Lyn Wik, 3965 Quentin Avenue South, thanked the Commission for having an
awareness and sensitivity for the concerns of the neighborhood. She objected to
the fact that the drawings are so small and don’t include the neighboring houses.
She stated that she believes the traffic projections needed to extend beyond the
year 2000. She questioned the vagueness of a realignment of Quentin Avenue and
asked what happens to the land that is left if Quentin is realigned.
Ms. Jeremiah explained that when streets are vacated, each half of the street
typically goes to the adjacent properties on either side and they obtain the remnant
street right of way. She indicated that all of this area is under study. She stated
that the triangular portion of the area that would result from a realignment would
probably become commercial because it would be balanced by the loss of
commercial property taken for the new road.
Ms. Wik stated she believes that any realignment of Quentin would open the door
for something new and different, although it would be a square footage tradeoff.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that a Task Force is looking at this issue and an open house
would be held for the public.
Jerry Olson, 3980 Princeton Avenue South, has been a resident for 20 years and
has seen the traffic increase already. He believes that the development would
compound this problem and is opposed to the drive-through.
John Hiner, 4000 Quentin Avenue South, stated that he does not see this
development working entering off of Quentin Avenue as it would create a mess in
the area.
Brett Boushele, 4956 40th Street, stated he is opposed to increased traffic in the
neighborhood. He questioned the assumptions made in the traffic study and
believes the numbers do not mean a lot. He indicated that there are homes on the
corner of Quentin and Vallacher which would be adversely affected by the traffic.
He is concerned about traffic circulation after he talked with the architect of
Norwest Bank who stated that the majority of the customers would come out of
the drive-through (onto Exclesior Boulevard) instead of coming out on Quentin.
45
Pat Strickler, 5016 W. 40th Street, stated that she appreciates the sensitivities of
the Commissioners and stated she is opposed to compounding the problems for
the neighborhood. She is interested in working together to help improve the area
and take what we have, build on it and reduce traffic, if possible, to improve
safety for residents.
Chair Morris indicated that there is a sidewalk and trail study, which is almost
complete, that is evaluating the need for sidewalks in the residential
neighborhoods.
Randall Sun, 4017 Quentin Avenue South, asked what the configuration of the
intersection of Excelsior Boulevard would be if Quentin is going to be realigned
and asked if there is a plan to continue Quentin north of Excelsior Boulevard.
Ms. Jeremiah indicated that the Task Force is looking at this issue and that the
option of extending Quentin north of Excelsior Boulevard is being considered
along with improving pedestrian crossings.
Mr. Sun stated that traffic calming doesn’t work and actually aggravates drivers.
He said that extending Quentin Avenue up to Park Center Boulevard would have
a huge impact on property values in the area.
Chair Morris requested that this is another issue that is relevant to the
neighborhood, but not the matter before the Planning Commission tonight.
Ruth Slatter, 4979 W. 40th Street, stated she has seen accidents on 40th and
Quentin. She believes there is a need for a four way stop at the intersection since
speed is more of a problem than volume.
Ms. Jeremiah indicated that residents could petition for additional stop signs by
contacting Carlton Moore of the Public Works Department at 924-2552.
Carol Olson, 3961 Quentin Avenue South, has been a resident for 30 years and
said that she and her husband are legally blind. She stated that traffic is already a
problem and she would like to see a sidewalk on 40th Street. She stated that the
pollution generated from a drive-through would adversely affect the
neighborhood.
Dean Williamson, Frauenshuh Companies explained the history of the
development.
Ms. Bissonnette asked what percentage of bank business is drive-through
customers.
46
Mr. Williamson stated he did not have exact numbers, but the majority of
customers would be drive-though customers and the peak time is the noon hour.
Ms. Bissonnette asked if the bank would consider relocating without drive-
throughs.
Mr. Williamson indicated that the drive-though would be necessary for relocation.
Mr. Timian asked if there is any property on the north side of Excelsior Boulevard
for relocation.
Mr. Williamson indicated that this was examined and no properties were available
to accommodate their needs.
Mike Gould, President of Silvercrest Companies, indicated that the goal of
redevelopment is to create more assisted living units. He stated that Parkshore
residents walk to the bank and have no problem with bank traffic, but have
problems with crossing Park Center Boulevard.
Mr. Gothberg stated he is concerned with the traffic circulation and suggested
using the proposed drive-though site for assisted living units with a dental clinic.
Rachell Bell Stanley, 4904 Vallacher Avenue, requested a copy of the traffic
study.
Ms. Jeremiah suggested that residents desiring a copy of the traffic study could
sign a sheet that would be left by the exit. Several people indicated interest and a
sign-up sheet was made available.
Gene Rasmussen, 4001 Quentin Avenue, suggested evaluating the speed limits on
the streets in the area before proceeding with any rerouting.
Chair Morris closed the public comment.
Chair Morris stated that the Commission desires to see development and
expansion within the City, but is concerned with having a drive-though at this site
and its affect on the neighborhood.
Mr. Garelick moved to recommend that the City Council deny the approval of the
amended Special Permit because of the adverse impact of the drive through on the
neighborhood. The motion passed on a vote of 5-1 with Bissonnette, Garelick,
Gothberg, Morris and Timian voting in favor and Carver opposed.
5. New Business
47
A. Consent Agenda - None
B. Other New Business
i. Case No. 99-01-ZA - Amendment to PUD Ordinance
Janet Jeremiah, Planning Manager, presented the staff report and
recommended approval of the amendment to allow density and height
modification by PUD, as long as they are to the assisted living building,
consistent with the Comprehensive Plan.
Mr. Timian asked how many stories would be added.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that it would expand the assisted living building at the
same height (4 stories) and it would connect to the existing Parkshore
building.
Mr. Timian asked if there are other areas that could have higher density.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that there are 2 parcels on the south side of Wolfe
Park that have been designated for up to 75 units per acre, and depending
on the types of units, it is possible to have high density without having
high-rise structures.
Mr. Gothberg moved to recommend that the City Council approve the
amendment to the PUD Ordinance consistent with staff’s
recommendation. The motion passed on a vote of 6-0 with Bissonnette,
Carver, Garelick, Gothberg, Morris and Timian voting in favor.
ii. Initiate Amendment to Zoning Ordinance to change zoning from “C-2”
Commercial to “RC” Multiple Family Residential for property located at
the southwest quadrant of Louisiana and Walker (Mill City Plywood Site).
Janet Jeremiah, Planning Manager, presented the staff report and
recommended that the Planning Commission initiate an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance.
Chair Morris asked if the property owner knows that this is being asked of
the Planning Commission.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that the property owner is aware of the issue since he
was involved in the Highway 7 & Louisiana Avenue Task Force and
subsequent Comprehensive Plan amendments. The property owner will be
notified of the proposed zoning amendment and future meetings of the
Planning Commission and City Council.
48
Mr. Timian asked if the property owner could continue to use the property
in the near future.
Ms. Jeremiah indicated that the owner can continue to use the property as
a non-conforming use as long as it is not vacant for more than six months.
Ms. Bissonnette moved to recommend that the Planning Commission
initiate an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to change the zoning from
“C-2” Commercial to “RC” Multiple Family Residential for the property
located at the southwest quadrant of Louisiana and Walker. The motion
passed on a vote of 6-0 with Bissonnette, Carver, Garelick, Gothberg,
Morris and Timian voting in favor.
6. Communications
A. Recent City Council Action - January 4, 1999
B. Chair Morris asked staff why the City Council deferred the Hutchinson Spur issue.
Ms. Jeremiah indicated that the Council requested additional information on options
for placing a sidewalk and trail, cost of obtaining easements and possibility of
building a retaining wall, and whether the developer would be amenable to the idea of
dedicating the easements.
C. Board of Zoning Appeals Minutes December 1, 1998
D. Board of Zoning Appeals Agenda December 29, 1998
E. The Secretary reported that the City Council reappointed Dennis Morris and Michael
Garelick to the Planning Commission for another 3 year term
F. Park Commons - Mr. Gothberg requested an update on the design plan for the Park
Commons area. Ms. Bissonnette noted that she is part of the Task Force which will
be making recommendations. Ms. Jeremiah indicated that the goal is to balance
bike/pedestrian access with vehicle access. The Planning Commission briefly
discussed redevelopment of the area and its impacts.
7. Miscellaneous
A. MnDOT Access Management - Ms. Jeremiah gave a brief report.
8. Adjournment
Chair Morris adjourned the meeting at 9:15 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Loftus
Administrative Secretary
49
Prepared by:
Shirley Olson
Recording Secretary
50
Item # 9b*
MINUTES
JOINT MEETING OF PARK AND RECREATION AND
PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 2, 1998 --5:30 P.M.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
PLANNING COMMISSION
MEMBERS PRESENT: Michelle Bissonnette, Paul Carver, Michael Garelick
Ken Gothberg, Dennis Morris, Jerry Timian
MEMBERS ABSENT: Sally Velick
PARK & RECREATION COMMISSION
MEMBERS PRESENT: James Martin, Christine Stephansen, Pete Chubb,
Dawn Wright, Jeff Davidman
MEMBERS ABSENT: Meriwether Felt
CONSULTANTS PRESENT: Bob Close, Barry Warner, Bruce Jacobson,
Andrew Cadock
STAFF PRESENT: Judie Erickson, Janet Jeremiah, Sacha Peterson,
Janice Loftus, Cindy Walsh, Jenny Buskey, Mike Roth
1. The meeting was called to order at 5:40 p.m.
2. Introductions
Bruce Jacobson asked those present to introduce themselves and he briefly reviewed the
agenda items.
3. What is this Master Plan Study all about?
Bob Close stated that they have been active on this project since September and have
covered a lot of ground. Now, it is at a critical point, in their thinking, and it is an
opportune time to hear from those present on what the Task Force has been through,
where we are headed with this and explain the concept that is emerging and coming to the
surface from all these exercises. He stated that the Mission is to develop a
comprehensive City wide system of trails and sidewalks that provides local and regional
activity, improves safety and access ability, and enhances overall community livability.
He explained that there are three phases to the scope of work which include visioning
goals and objectives, working with the Task Force, completion of a final Task Force
51
report, and then package the recommendations from the study into the Comprehensive
Plan by late winter.
4. What do we have to work with?
Barry Warner described existing conditions with respect to land uses. He explained that,
from a sidewalk perspective, where the traditional grid is in contrast to some of the areas
that may have been laid out traditionally, but the sidewalks are not existent, versus
perhaps the northwest portion of community where its more of a suburban feel and there
is no grid to rely upon and there are no sidewalks that have been included in that area. He
described the proposed trail connections and anticipated completion dates
Bob Close explained that a phone survey was recently conducted by Decision Resources
and found that residents really liked the idea of sidewalkds in the abstract but are not
necessarily so enthused about it if it is going to be in front of their place. He indicated
that several issues and challenges related to both residents responses and existing City
policy were discovered and will need to prioritized.
5. What are the key issues and opportunities emerging from this work?
Bob Close described the photo boards and mapping completed by Task Force members.
He stated that it is important to determine if this plan would work for neighborhoods and
indicated that the Task Force noticed that there are areas where certain kinds of things
overlap (centers of gravity, areas of synergy).
6. How can we build a consensus plan?
Bob Close stated that The Concept Plan has evolved from a schematic diagram and the
‘systems approach’. He explained that, basically, the north/south connection is being
evaluated and the location is yet to be determined. Andrew Cadock stated that it is
important to determine specifically what is needed by the residents and where the gaps in
the neighborhoods exist.
7. Question and Answer:
Ms. Bissonnette asked if items ??? were broken down where higher volumes of traffic
occurred.
Mr. Cadock stated that there have not been numbers attached to those items yet.
Ms. Stephansen asked if there is some standard of construction that streets of certain
width require sidewalks.
52
Mr. Warner stated that they are currently examining details of this issue and expressed a
need to also examine physical impediments of streets and cost implications of some of the
cross sections.
Mr. Close stated that the presence of children on streets is an important factor to consider.
Ms. Stephansen asked if paint and striping could be used in the construction and if
signage of trail routes had been discussed.
Mr. Close stated that all trails would be signed, however it is less desirable to have multi
uses on the same pavement.
Mr. Warner stated that there are liability restrictions with sharing road signs.
Mr. Timian stated that there is a bottleneck at Highway 7 and Wooddale and asked if it
had been addressed. He also noted that some of the congestion at this intersection is
caused by commuters needing to cross Highway 7.
Mr. Warner stated that the community is graded by large streets and highways which give
rise not only to crossing of conflict points, but also to what are some of these
neighborhood issues because people just can’t get anywhere because they feel
constrained.
Mr. Cadock indicated that focus areas for cross walks have been identified in certain
areas and Highway 7 and Wooddale is one of these areas.
Mr. Morris indicated that the Commission has discussed the need for new developments
to have defined cross walks and have timed signals for safety.
Mr. Jacobson stated it is also important to have defined crosswalks to bring people to the
crossings.
Mr. Timian suggested the possibility of constructing tunnels in some areas.
Mr. Warner indicated that both tunnels and bridges would be considered to aid in
providing safety for residents.
Those present discussed several areas throughout the community where pedestrian are
unable to cross streets resulting in potential danger to residents and their desire to
construct a pedestrian friendly system that is safe.
Mr. Close stated, in discussions with the City about a overhead walkway on Excelsior
Boulevard, the City desired to reclaim that area for pedestrian use.
53
Ms. Jeremiah stated that staff has received some resistance from the County and State
about prioritizing the principles of trying to integrate various modes of transportation and
making it pedestrian friendly.
Mr. Jacobson reiterated the need to prioritize the key spots.
Ms. Stephansen asked if Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100 is going to be
improved.
Ms. Erickson indicated that Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100 is not on the
schedule to be improved at this time.
Ms. Bissonnette inquired about the possible expansion of the Park Nicollet complex.
Ms. Jeremiah indicated there is a need for the bridge over Highway 100 to be improved.
Mr. Morris asked, if as pedestrian ways are being considered, are the infrastructure needs,
such as the visibility issues being addressed.
Mr. Warner indicated that the regional trails are not going to be lighted and questioned
the need of the study to look at lighting as part of the cross sections which has not been a
focus up to this point.
Mr. Morris asked if sources of funding for the concept have been examined.
Mr. Warner explained that this will need to be investigated before the study is completed.
He stated that there would probably be a wide spectrum of financing mechanisms which
may include full, or in part, assessments on side and front yards.
Mr. Close stated that the Task Force has looked at what some other cities have done.
Ms. Stephansen indicated that it is important that all designs be consistent throughout the
community and questioned who would oversee the projects.
Ms. Erickson stated that a Capital Improvement Program would be set up and
implemented by the Public Works Department.
Mr. Jacobson asked those present if there were any other key issues that needed to be
addressed.
Mr. Timian noted the area north of Methodist Hospital which is a highly used transit
route and the Louisiana Avenue and Highway 7 area.
Ms. Jeremiah stated the need to consider the idea of separation of types of trail traffic
and the question of multi-use trails being safe.
54
Mr. Gothberg stated the Task Force is discussing the issue of sidewalks for walkers and
streets for bicyclists.
Ms. Bissonnette asked where the pedestrian trail on Minnehaha Creek is going to be.
Mr. Cadock explained the area near Knollwood is being considered.
Ms. Stephansen suggested that instead of assessing individual homeowners, it may be a
possibility to assess by neighborhood.
Mr. Morris suggested setting up an influence zone to determine who is influenced by the
improvement and then set up assessments. He stated that assessments are covered under
State Law.
Mr. Gothberg raised the need to continue to review the maintenance of sidewalks.
Mr. Jacobson indicated that the ordinance has no provision for the City to take
responsibility of maintenance or repair of sidewalks.
Mr. Morris stated that it is important to examine this issue because the sidewalks become
impassable and residents then go into the streets. He suggested that the City look at code
enforcement and pass an ordinance that requires people to maintain their sidewalks.
Mr. Roth stated that there is no established enforcement provision that the phone survey
indicated that people are willing to shovel.
Ms. Erickson briefly reviewed the content of a recent handout that was distributed and
noted that 45% responded that residents should be responsible.
Ms. Bissonette asked if there are alternatives to concrete surfaces for sidewalks.
Mr. Cadock stated that alternatives have not been examined, but would be more
expensive.
Mr. Warner indicated that Hennepin County owns the trail and the County leaves it up to
the City to plow the trail.
Mr. Cadock stated that the design should be consistent throughout the City.
Mr. Morris indicated that there is a difference between a recreational trail and a commuter
trail.
Mr. Warner indicated that the City of Minneapolis has elected to fund areas through
ISTEA money which is focused on commuter trails and not recreational trails. He
55
believes it is important to plow the trails so that commuters can travel to work between
Minneapolis and St. Louis Park.
Mr. Jacobson stated that the 10 miles of existing trails in the City are plowed by Parks
and Recreation.
Ms. Stephansen asked if there is access to the Hutchinson Spur at Virginia.
Mr. Warner stated that that the regional trail does not cover this, but the concept plan
would address the issue.
Ms. Erickson indicated that there are no plans to improve bridge at this site.
8. What are the next steps?
Mr. Jacobson explained that the next steps will be to prepare a refined Concept Plan,
preliminary design guidelines and preliminary implementation strategy. He reviewed the
schedule of meetings and noted there would be another joint meeting on January 6th and
those present would receive a packet prior to meeting.
9. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 6:50 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Janice Loftus
Administrative Secretary
Prepared by:
Shirley Olson
Recording Secretary
56
Item # 9c*
MINUTES
HOUSING AUTHORITY
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
January 13, 1999 - 5:20 p.m.
Council Chambers
MEMBERS PRESENT: Catherine Courtney, William Gavzy, Walter Hartman,
Shone Row
MEMBERS ABSENT: Bridget Gothberg
STAFF PRESENT: Sharon Anderson, Joanna Brownstein, Tom Harmening,
Nancy Sells, Cindy Stromberg
1. Call to Order
Commissioner Gavzy called the meeting to order at 5:20 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes of December 9, 1998
Commissioner Hartman moved approval of the minutes of December 9, 1998.
Commissioner Courtney seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0
with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
3. Hearings: None
4. Reports and Committees: None
5. Unfinished Business: None
6. New Business
a. Home Renewal Program - 3401/5 Rhode Island Avenue S.
Ms. Brownstein reported that a purchase agreement has been executed between
the seller and the Housing Authority for the purchase of the properties at 3401/5
Rhode Island Avenue South. Closing is scheduled for the last week of January.
Ms. Brownstein reviewed information relative to whether the property at 3405
Rhode Island should be developed as a rehab project under Habitat for Humanity
or as a demolition/new construction under the Home Renewal Program.
Ms. Brownstein said that staff recommends that the property be redeveloped
through the Home Renewal Program which would involve demolishing the home
57
and selling the vacant lot to a private developer for the construction of a new
single family home.
Commissioners indicated their support of the staff recommendation.
Mr. Harmening said that a notice would be distributed to the neighborhood
regarding the project. He said that a number of diseased and damaged trees will
need to be removed from the property.
In response to Commissioner Gavzy's question regarding the project schedule,
Ms. Brownstein responded that a simultaneous closing of the two properties will
occur in late January. Demolition and tree removal should occur in early spring.
Negotiations for the vacant lot with the Park Commons family might occur in late
winter or early spring. Bids for the lots could go out over the winter. Summer
construction on both properties is anticipated.
b. Housing Rehabilitation Program
Ms. Brownstein reviewed significant changes which will be proposed to the City
Council on January 25 on expansions and modifications to the City's single family
rehabilitation programs. Changes are being proposed to encourage more single
family rehabs and home expansions.
Ms. Brownstein said that issues to be considered in the first four strategies
include: 1) proposed greater reliance on outside agencies to administer single
family rehab programs and how City funds will be used to leverage state and
private funds and 2) whether the Housing Authority will assume responsibility for
overseeing housing rehab programs and initiatives or whether this authority will
remain with the City Council.
Commissioners indicated their support of proposing that the Authority assume
responsibility for overseeing programs of the four strategy areas. Commissioner
Courtney indicated support of Housing Authority oversight of future programs
and initiatives as well if staff resources permit.
Commissioners Courtney and Gavzy indicated their support of the expansion of
the Home Renewal program.
Commissioner Gavzy requested that the Board receive additional information on
rehab housing programs, including housing information normally being provided
to the City Council.
Mr. Harmening said that the Board will receive the staff memorandum which is
being prepared for the City Council study session. The memorandum is a
comprehensive overview of current and proposed housing programs. Ms.
58
Brownstein added that the Board also could be given the housing program
information packet which is provided to the public on request.
c. Development of Park Commons - Hollman Update
Ms. Brownstein reported that meetings are on-going with staff, the Park
Commons developer (Avalon Bay), the Minneapolis PHA, and HUD regarding
the inclusion of Hollman units in Phase I of the Park Commons Development.
Ms. Brownstein reviewed the agreements that will need to be negotiated and
entered into with all of the different parties. She said that the next few months
will be very busy as a full proposal to HUD for Hollman funding will be
submitted in May or June and all of the agreements will need to be in place prior
to submission.
The cooperation agreement between the City and the Authority may be brought to
the Board as early as February for amendment or re-execution.
Ms. Brownstein said that staff is currently proposing that the assisted units will be
owned and managed by the private developer. The units will be included in the
Authority's ACC. The Authority will pass through the monthly operating subsidy
to the owner of those units. The Authority may retain an administrative fee which
will need to be negotiated.
Commissioner Gavzy asked if similar Hollman projects exist. Ms. Brownstein
responded that thirteen Hollman projects have been completed and that each
organizational structure is unique.
Ms. Brownstein discussed the estimated development cost per unit.
Commissioner Gavzy asked if any architectural information about the units was
available.
Ms. Brownstein responded that details are not yet available. She explained that
the City has been working for several years with some ideas in mind which reflect
a basic new urbanist concept of commercial/retail on the first floor with two to
four floors of residential above.
There was a discussion about the location of the units in the development.
Commissioner Gavzy inquired about the day-to-day involvement of the Authority
with Hollman units.
Ms. Brownstein responded that the Authority would manage the waiting list for
the units and perhaps be responsible for tenant certifications.
59
Commissioner Hartman discussed the idea of recycling the Authority's older
single family homes back into the private sector and gradually replacing them
with new Hollman housing, particularly homes that may be costing the Authority
substantially more to operate or maintain.
Ms. Brownstein said that she and Mr. Harmening have been discussing ways to
share Hollman project details with the Authority. They have discussed ideas such
as special meetings, special materials and a presentation by Minneapolis PHA
staff.
Mr. Harmening asked if the board was comfortable in pursuing opportunities for
Hollman funds.
Commissioner Gavzy said he believes the board is comfortable with moving
ahead with the project.
There was a discussion about tax credit availability and the kind of development
model MHFA seems to be supporting currently.
d. Section 8 Certificate Budget Fiscal Year-End March 31, 2000
A revised budget was distributed. Ms. Stromberg said that almost all funding for
the Certificate and Voucher programs is expiring at the end of March before the
start of the next fiscal year. HUD cannot yet advise staff of new increment
amounts. Staff has been instructed to prepare the budget with last year's figures.
A budget revision will be done when actual numbers become available. Ms.
Stromberg said that Line 19 needs to be amended to reflect FSS grant money for
eight months of fiscal year-end 3/31/2000.
Commissioner Hartman moved that the Authority approve the Section 8
Certificate budget as amended with FSS change for the fiscal year ending March
31, 2000. Commissioner Courtney seconded the motion, and the motion passed
on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting
in favor.
e. Section 8 Voucher Budget Fiscal Year-End March 31, 2000
Commissioner Hartman moved approval of the Section 8 Voucher budget for the
Fiscal Year Ending March 31, 2000. Commissioner Courtney seconded the
motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners Courtney,
Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
f. Payment Standard Increase - Resolution No. 450
60
Ms. Stromberg explained that the Payment Standard determines how much
assistance is paid on behalf of voucher participants. She added that typically the
Payment Standard, which generally reflects changes made to the Fair Market
Rent, isn't changed until the new budget is prepared. She explained that Sue
Wiseman, the Voucher manager, does an analysis on how much tenants are paying
and how those standards actually work with rents.
Commissioner Hartman moved to adopt Resolution No. 450 approving the
Payment Standard Schedules for the Section 8 Voucher program. Commissioner
Row seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with
Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
Chairman Gavzy's title will be corrected on Resolution 450.
g. Leasing and Occupancy Plan
An amendment to the report was distributed. Ms. Anderson reviewed the
substantive changes. One change regarded a correction to project numbers. The
other substantive change clarified which amendments would require approval by
the Authority and which changes could be amended by certification by the
Housing Manager.
Commissioner Courtney moved that the Authority adopt the revised Leasing and
Occupancy Plan contingent on approval by HUD. Commissioner Row seconded
the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners Courtney,
Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
h. Caretaker Contract
Ms. Anderson reviewed the duties of the caretakers.
Commissioner Hartman moved that the Authority authorize execution of the
following contracts: (1) a contract with James and Michelle Hestad for
caretaking services at Hamilton House to include free rental of Unit 422 and
compensation of $320 per month to begin on January 15, 1999, and terminate on
March 31, 2000, and (2) a contract with Zinoviy and Galina Savitskiy for
caretaking services at Hamilton House to include free rental of Unit 222 and
compensation of $320 per month which rescinds the current contract and begins
on February 1, 1999, and terminates on March 31, 2000. Commissioner Courtney
seconded the motion, and
the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy,
Hartman and Row voting in favor.
i. Resolution of Appreciation for Steve Nelson - Resolution No. 451
61
Commissioner Row moved approval of Resolution No. 451 recognizing
contributions and expressing appreciation to Steve Nelson. Commissioner
Gavzy seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with
Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
j. Agreement for Accounting Consulting Services
Mr. Harmening said that Ms. Apfelbacher's compensation would be at a rate of
$30.00 per hour.
Commissioner Courtney noted that the agreement needs to include an independent
contractor section.
Mr. Harmening said that he will add that language to the agreement.
Commissioner Gavzy suggested that language be added to the agreement
indicating that the work is based on the Executive Director's direction since there
isn't a fixed fee or maximum amount to exceed.
Mr. Harmening asked if the board could approve the agreement contingent on his
including the additions discussed.
Commissioner Courtney suggested that authorization of the agreement be subject
to her approval of the revised document. All commissioners and Mr. Harmening
agreed with the suggestion.
Commissioner Courtney moved that subject to her approval of the amended
agreement, the Housing Authority authorize entering into an agreement with
Brenda Apfelbacher for the transition of accounting functions of the St. Louis
Park Housing Authority to the City of St. Louis Park. Commissioner Hartman
seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners
Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
7. Communications from Executive Director
a. Claims List 99-1
Commissioner Courtney moved approval of Claims List 99-1 in the amount of
$118,573.42. Commissioner Hartman seconded the motion, and the motion
passed on a vote of 4-0 with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row
voting in favor.
b. Communications
62
(1) Monthly Report for January, 1999
The report was accepted and filed.
(2) Update on Reorganization
Mr. Harmening said that the reorganization will be a study session agenda
item at the upcoming City Council meeting.
Mr. Harmening said that he continues to meet with the City's HR manager
on staffing issues and job descriptions. He said that after the February
meeting with the board, he anticipates proceeding with the hiring of the
administrative support, supervisory, and housing assistant positions.
(3) Action Plan Update
Commissioner Courtney requested that the following dates be added to the
update: action plan adoption date, date of each monthly update and dates
on status items where appropriate.
(4) Scattered Site Houses and Hamilton House Update
Ms. Anderson reported that the family living in the accessible single
family unit has given notice to vacate effective February 5. A new tenant
family has been screened for the unit.
(5) Home Renewal Program and Habitat Program Update
Ms. Brownstein reported that the Blackstone Ave. house is almost
completed. Mr. Stobbe will begin marketing the sale of the house to a
homeowner by the end of January or early February.
Ms. Brownstein said that after the 2916 Maryland Av. house was
purchased and demolished, the Public Works Dept. identified the site as a
good location for a storm water ponding project to solve flooding
problems in the neighborhood. A decision will be made in late February.
Ms. Brownstein said that the owner of the 2808 Georgia house has not yet
accepted the Authority's offer. Ms. Brownstein has informed the owner
that the Authority must have a decision by the end of January.
Ms. Brownstein reported that the closing of the Habitat house on 2937
Maryland Ave. has been rescheduled again and will occur on January 27.
Rehab construction is expected to begin in April. Ms. Brownstein said
that neighborhood notification by Habitat has been delayed because the
63
closing was rescheduled more than once. Habitat expects to go door-to-
door in the neighborhood to make introductions as soon as they take
ownership of the property.
64
8. Other
Commissioner Gavzy commented on the net outflow of Public Housing and Section 8
Certificate fund balances in December. Mr. Harmening will review the numbers with
staff to ensure their accuracy and to clarify the reasons for the net outflow.
9. Adjournment
Commissioner Gavzy moved to adjourn the meeting at 7:00 p.m. Commissioner
Courtney seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 4-0 with
Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy, Hartman and Row voting in favor.
Respectfully submitted,
_____________________
Walter Hartman
Secretary
jan-min:c\hsg
65
Item # 9d*
PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
Minutes of Wednesday, January 13, 1999
Retreat at Nature Center Brick House
MEMBERS PRESENT: Martin, Stephansen, Felt, Wright, Davidman
MEMBERS ABSENT: Chubb
STAFF PRESENT: Walsh, Voelker
1. CALL TO ORDER - Meeting called to order by Mr. Martin at 6:03 p.m.
2. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE AGENDA - None.
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 18, 1998 - Motion to approve by Ms. Felt,
seconded by Ms. Wright. Motion passed 5-0.
4. NEW BUSINESS
A) Reciprocity Agreement with Minnetonka and Golden Valley: Ms. Walsh distributed
the agreement and advised the Commission of the benefit of the agreement. Ms.
Walsh also informed the Commission that Hopkins has expressed an interest in
reciprocity but have nothing to contribute at this time. The City of Hopkins has been
contemplating building a permanent skate park. If they do this, the City may consider
a reciprocity at that time. Mr. Martin inquired about a reciprocity with other cities
such as Minneapolis or Edina. After further discussion, the Commission agreed they
may consider this in the future if the attendance to the aquatic park drops.
Motion to approve recommendations by Ms. Stephansen, seconded by Ms. Felt.
Motion passed 5-0.
B) Review and Comment on Parks Comprehensive Plan: Ms. Walsh distributed the
Comprehensive Plan and asked the Commission to review it and give their feedback
to either Judie Erickson or herself.
C) Annual Report Review: The Commission reviewed the report and decided
presentation dates would be as follows: to the City Council on February 8 by Mr.
Martin and to the School Board on February 22 by Ms. Felt.
D) Work Plan for 1999: Please see attached work plan for specifics.
E) Goals of PRAC / Project Participation: The Commission will use the 1999 Work
Plan.
F) Meeting Day / Time Review: Ms. Walsh inquired if the second Wednesday of every
month at 7 p.m. worked well for everyone. The meeting date and time will remain the
same.
5. OLD BUSINESS
66
A) Black Tie Dinner Discussion: The Commission agreed to pursue Jessie Ventura as
the speaker one last time. If no commitment by January 15, Mr. Martin will ask Bob
Stein or Mark Trestman. The cost summary along with cost cut-back was briefly
discussed. Also, appetizers were suggested as part of the silent auction area.
The Commission split up duties as follows: Ms. Stephansen will check into a caterer;
Mr. Martin will work on getting a speaker; Ms. Wright will lead in organizing the
silent auction; Mr. Davidman will check into having artwork in the Gallery by the
Friends of the Arts or another organization; and Mr. Chubb was elected to work on
the award winners. Other suggestions discussed: dance or swing lessons for fun and
to have the community band play music. A breakfast meeting for Thursday, February
4 at 7:30 a.m. at Lincoln Del was arranged to check on the progress of all items listed
above.
B) February 3, 1999 - Joint Meeting with Planning Commission: Ms. Walsh reminded
the Commission of the joint meeting with the Planning Commission.
6. COMMUNICATIONS
A) Chair - None.
B) Commissioners - None.
C) Staff
1. School District Strategic Planning Team: Ms. Walsh encouraged Commission
members to volunteer for teams. Mr. Martin briefed the Commission on how
it works, how long it will last (approximately two months), and also
encouraged members to volunteer.
2. Oak Hill Park Neighborhood Meeting: Ms. Walsh advised the Commission of
a neighborhood meeting on March 17 at 7:00 p.m. that she was invited to and
asked if anyone may want to attend to get a feel for what the neighborhood
wants.
7. ADJOURNMENT - Motion to adjourn the meeting was made by Mr. Davidman and
seconded by Ms. Wright. Motion passed 5-0. Meeting was adjourned at 8:31 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Stacy M. Voelker
Department Secretary
67
Item 9e*
February 5, 1999
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
A W W A OFFICE SUPPLIES 158.00
ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 339.36
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 274.21
ALBINSONS SMALL TOOLS 227.47
ANDERSEN INC, EARL F OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 234.83
ARAMARK UNIFORM CORPORATE ACCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 445.22
ASSO OF RECORDS MGRS AND ADMIN TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 70.00
AUTOTRAAC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 275.00
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 62.84
BIFFS INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 146.26
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 782.61
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 194.93
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 45.22
BRITISH LANDSCAPES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 163.04
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BROWNSTEIN, JOANNA MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 62.93
BRYAN ADVERTISING COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 944.38
CALHOUN TOWERS APARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 543.75
CARTRIDGE CARE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 709.41
CATCO PARTS SERVICE EQUIPMENT PARTS 117.30
CITY OF GOLDEN VALLEY FIRE DEP GENERAL SUPPLIES 64.00
CLUTCH & U-JOINT EQUIPMENT PARTS 174.03
CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 179.84
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 409.46
CURTIS 1000 INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.90
CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,712.50
DELEGARD TOOL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES (65.54)
DUDEK, MELISSA TOWING FEES 90.00
ELECTION SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE IN EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,894.38
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.08
ENVIRONMENT ENERGY RESOURCE CT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24,038.42
EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,188.84
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP POSTAGE 28.25
FIRE MARSHAL ASSOC OF MN TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 195.00
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP EQUIPMENT PARTS (30.44)
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 836.34
GLOCK INC. TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 170.00
GRAINGER INC, W W GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.96
GRAYBOW COMMUNICATIONS RENTAL EQUIPMENT 53.25
HARMENING, TOM TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 30.00
HASLERUD, CARRIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 138.05
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 2,095.17
HELICOPTER FLIGHT INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 214.50
68
HENN CO ACCOUNTING SERVICES DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 11,497.00
HENN CO TREASURER GENERAL SUPPLIES 8,049.97
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.00
HILL, HAROLD INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
HOME HARDWARE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 34.61
HOWARD R. GREEN COMPANY PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 40,743.26
HYDRO SUPPLY COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 153.36
I T L PATCH COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 84.67
IMC SALT INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 13,552.48
INACOM INFORMATION SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,726.53
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 24.43
INTERSTATE DETROIT DIESEL EQUIPMENT PARTS 241.70
IOS CAPITAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 1,342.97
IVERSON, RICHARD INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
KONICA BUSINESS MACHINES RENTAL EQUIPMENT 39.41
LAKELAND ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT PARTS 112.16
LEES SHOE REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.00
LINHOFF PHOTO & DIGITAL IMAGIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 30.72
LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC LUBRICANTS/ADDITIVES (300.00)
MAIL BOXES ETC # 1236 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 16.43
MAKI, PAUL TOWING FEES 90.00
MAPHCC TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 50.00
MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 960.00
MC BRIDE, KATHLEEN MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 71.24
METRO AREA MGMT ASSN SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 45.00
METRO ATHLETIC SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 514.77
METRO CISM PROGRAM TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 50.00
METRO SALES INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 428.69
MFAPC SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 35.00
MINN CHIEFS POLICE ASSOCIATION TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 150.00
MINN CITY MGRS ASSN TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 145.00
MINNEAPOLIS AQUATENNIAL UNREALIZED REVENUE 335.00
MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING & PUBLISHING 1,154.00
MINVALCO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 924.00
MN INSTITUTE OF LEGAL EDUCATIO TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 468.00
MN POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY LICENSES/TAXES 168.00
MN/S C I A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 18.00
MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (20.77)
N A F A TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 295.00
NATIONAL BUSINESS INSTITUTE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 358.00
NORTHLAND ELECTRIC SUPPLY CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.30
NORTHSTAR REPRO PRODUCTS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 62.58
NORTHWEST CHAPTER F B I N A A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 60.00
NSP CO ELECTRIC UTILITIES 7,080.57
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 654.32
OLSON, AMY INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
PARK LIGHTING INC. OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,089.94
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 630.00
PARTS PLUS EQUIPMENT PARTS 95.87
69
PETERSON, SACHA TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 35.00
PEWAG INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS 435.68
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 1,713.29
PRECISION LINE INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.84
PRESTIGE LINCOLN MERCURY EQUIPMENT PARTS 40.26
R J MARCO CONSTRUCTION DEPOSITS PAYABLE 12,900.00
RAINBOW FOODS SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 86.98
SA-AG INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,644.90
SCHWAAB INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 57.70
SHELL, JOHN INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
SHORT-ELLIOTT-HENDRICKSON PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 390.09
SIGN IMAGES BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 122.47
SOJOURNER PROJECT INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,789.75
SOUTHWEST FIRE LEAGUE SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 125.00
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,417.08
STANDARD PLUMBING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 214.50
STANDARD SPRING OF MPLS EQUIPMENT PARTS 675.62
SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS 54.30
SURVIVALINK GENERAL SUPPLIES 207.75
SWEENEY BROS TRACTOR EQUIPMENT PARTS 8,747.91
THYMES TWO CATERING MEETING EXPENSE 298.21
TRACY/TRIPP FUELS MOTOR FUELS 5,826.25
TWIN CITY OPTICAL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 345.49
TWIN WEST CHAMBER OF COMMERCE MEETING EXPENSE 155.30
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 2.80
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 151.72
VMAM SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 20.00
VOSS LIGHTING EQUIPMENT PARTS 32.12
WATSON CO INC CONCESSION SUPPLIES 1,954.24
WEST WELD GENERAL SUPPLIES 146.14
WILLIAMS STEEL & HDWE EQUIPMENT PARTS 27.99
WINTERGREEN RESORT TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 125.07
WSB ASSOCIATES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,540.50
ZACKS INC SMALL TOOLS 161.35
ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 495.24
ZIP PRINTING OFFICE SUPPLIES 57.24
ZIP SORT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 166.35
208,436.43
February 12, 1999
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
A & T UPHOLSTERY CO EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 95.00
ABM EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 178.47
ADVANCED STATE SECURITY GENERAL SUPPLIES 113.75
ADVANTA BANK CORP OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 97.45
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 1,967.30
ALLIANCE MECHANICAL SERVICES I BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 439.00
ALMSTED'S NEW MARKET GENERAL SUPPLIES 491.99
70
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 202.00
ANCHOR PAPER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,414.61
ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS INC. RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 156.66
ANTONSON, DALE STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 196.66
ARAMARK UNIFORM CORPORATE ACCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 411.54
ASPLUND COFFEE COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 96.00
AUTOMATIC GARAGE DOOR CO BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 179.22
AUTOMOTIVE NEWS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 109.00
BACHMANS BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 107.57
BARON, EILEEN OFFICE SUPPLIES 275.05
BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,155.00
BENILDE-ST MARGARETS OTHER IMPROVEMENTS 7,500.00
BERNDT ELECTRIC SERVICE BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 306.00
BLUE OCEAN SOFTWARE INC COMPUTER SERVICES 795.00
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 294.89
BOCHE, BRIDGETT STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 1,600.00
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 1,549.64
BRENTS SIGNS GENERAL SUPPLIES 264.12
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
CALIFORNIA CONTRACTORS SUPPLIE GENERAL SUPPLIES 291.64
CHAFFIN, JIM DOG 12.50
CLUTCH & U-JOINT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 174.03
COLICH & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,484.62
COLLINS COMMUNICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.20
COLLISYS ELECTRIC CO OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 303.90
COMPUSA INC NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 304.12
CRILEY, KATHI L POSTAGE 164.27
CRYSTEEL TRUCK EQUIP INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 127.88
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 111.23
CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,740.00
D.J.'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.83
DALCO CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 170.31
DANKO EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,279.47
DATABASE TECHNOLOGIES INC OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.00
DAY-TIMERS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.74
DELEGARD TOOL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES (65.54)
DENNYS ROLL-OFF SERVICES GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 1,070.00
DO IT BEST RENTAL CENTER BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES (12.46)
DVORAK, BRAD STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 170.70
E & S ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 290.21
ECOLAB GENERAL SUPPLIES 244.10
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS OFFICE SUPPLIES 19.18
ENSR CONSULTING & ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,000.00
EPA AUDIO VISUAL INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 91.69
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 15.67
FAHNING, MARK MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 172.75
FOLSOM, SCOTT INSPECTION-SINGLE/DOUBLE 25.00
FOUR SEASONS TRAVEL INC TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 293.00
GARELICK STEEL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 188.05
71
GARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 332.12
GENERAL SAFETY EQUIPMENT CORP EQUIPMENT PARTS (30.44)
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 424.55
GRAFIX SHOPPE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 156.83
GRAINGER INC, W W BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 320.89
GREAT LAKES DIVISION IAFC TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 99.00
GREEN TREE VENDOR SERVICES COR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 751.89
H & H TV & ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 35.00
HACKLEY, DAVID TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 43.73
HARCEY, MICHAEL L TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 67.25
HATCH SALES CO OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,191.47
HENN CO PUBLIC RECORDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30.50
HENNEPIN COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS D CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 7,381.51
HENNEPIN COUNTY SHERIFF SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 354.86
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 176.14
HOFFMAN, BRIAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.84
HOME HARDWARE GENERAL SUPPLIES 171.87
HORTON SALES COMPANY INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 65.20
HUIRAS, SHIRLEY OFFICE SUPPLIES 135.79
ICE SKATING INSTITUTE OF AMERI GENERAL SUPPLIES 632.50
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.30
INACOM INFORMATION SYSTEMS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 4,457.90
INTL SECURITY PRODUCTS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 373.18
INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 4,410.00
IZAAK WALTON LEAGUE OF AMERICA DEPOSITS PAYABLE 88.00
J & F REDDY RENTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 31.95
J H LARSON COMPANY BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 592.78
JOHNSON, DICK GENERAL SUPPLIES 26.37
KANSAS STATE BANK OF MANHATTAN CAPITALIZED INTEREST 1,994.31
KELBY, MIKE ADULT ATHLETICS 25.00
KNOX LUMBER COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 931.21
LAKE COUNTRY CHAPTER-ICBO TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 135.00
LATHROP PAINT SUPPLY COMPANY BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 107.89
LAW ENFORCEMENT OPPORTUNITIES MEETING EXPENSE 20.00
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 100.00
LORENZ, STUART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 277.67
LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES INC LUBRICANTS/ADDITIVES (300.00)
M R P A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,293.00
MACQUEEN EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 546.65
MAIL BOXES ETC # 1236 PRINTING & PUBLISHING 23.87
MAMA/GMC LABOR RELATIONS SUBSC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,180.00
MARSHALL & SWIFT SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 33.95
MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES 180.38
MENARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.48
METRO CISM PROGRAM TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 50.00
METRO SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,180.91
METROCALL TELEPHONE 220.95
MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 85.93
MINN DEPT OF ADMINISTRATION RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 3,054.38
72
MINN MEETINGS & EVENTS INC OTHER ADVERTISING 1,620.00
MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 351.25
MINNEGASCO HEATING GAS 29,296.82
MINNESOTA BOOK STORE GENERAL SUPPLIES 384.34
MINUTEMAN PRESS PRINTING & PUBLISHING 58.00
MN DEPT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY LICENSES/TAXES 20.00
MTI DISTRIBUTING CO TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 270.00
MYERS TIRE SUPPLY COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (20.77)
NELSON, CHRIS TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 268.00
NOVARTIS NUTRITION CORP. GENERAL CUSTOMERS 6,857.30
NSP CO ELECTRIC UTILITIES 59,717.84
NYSTROM PUBLISHING PRINTING & PUBLISHING 2,685.00
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 92.09
OFFICE MAX OFFICE SUPPLIES 552.30
ORACLE CORPORATION EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 772.13
PARK PET HOSPITAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,088.52
PARTNERS IN PERSONNEL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 551.25
POLICE EXECUTIVE RESEARCH FORU SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 125.00
POMMER MFG CO INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 511.70
POWER SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT PARTS 202.35
PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION INC. GENERAL SUPPLIES 78.58
PRESTIGE LINCOLN MERCURY EQUIPMENT PARTS 207.40
QUILL CORPORATION OFFICE SUPPLIES 122.88
QUINLAN PUBLISHING CO INC SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 66.00
R & R SPECIALTIES EQUIPMENT PARTS 298.86
RAGAN TIRE CO, BRAD TIRES 994.42
RAINBOW FOODS SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 80.22
RANDY'S SANITATION INC GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 2,822.23
RELIABLE OFFICE SUPPLIES 154.61
RICHARDSON, RACHEL PROGRAMMING 16.00
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS (57.48)
SA-AG INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,991.38
SAFETY-KLEEN CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 215.93
SEVEN CORNERS ACE HDWE NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 94.79
SLP SCHOOL DISTRICT 283 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 945.00
SPS COMPANIES INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (32.70)
ST CROIX RECREATION COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,245.38
ST LOUIS PARK TRUE VALUE GENERAL SUPPLIES 24.26
STAT MEDICAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.00
SUBURBAN FEED & SUPPLY GENERAL SUPPLIES 97.75
SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS 107.54
SUN NEWSPAPERS LEGAL NOTICES 92.30
SYSTEMS SUPPLY INC OFFICE SUPPLIES 71.57
TANK RE-NU OF MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 245.00
TWIN CITY SAW & SERVICE CO SMALL TOOLS 138.23
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 3,388.17
UNIFORMS UNLIMITED GENERAL SUPPLIES 486.00
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 1,245.00
VIKING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 195.00
73
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES 196.13
W & W GENERATOR REBUILDERS EQUIPMENT PARTS 94.79
WALSER FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS 76.71
WARNING LIGHTS TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 20.00
WARNING LITES OF MN INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,250.31
WATSON CO INC CONCESSION SUPPLIES 886.00
WESTSIDE EQUIPMENT BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 785.20
WILLIAMS STEEL & HDWE EQUIPMENT PARTS 48.95
WOLF CAMERA INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 65.30
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES (7.67)
ZIEGLER INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 162.80
ZIP PRINTING PRINTING & PUBLISHING 152.40
ZIP SORT POSTAGE 90.09
212,969.36
February 10,1999
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
LONG LAKE FAMILY PHYSICIANS WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 10.00
METHODIST HOSPITAL WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 305.19
OLSON, DON INJURY PAY 1,039.03
PARK NICOLLET MEDICAL CENTER WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 407.16
PAULOUSKI, WADE INJURY PAY 880.04
SEDGEWICK MANAGED CARE WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 28.50
SUHL, JOEL WORKERS COMPENSATION INSURANCE 9.00
THOMPSON, JIM INJURY PAY 1,717.96
VANN, DAVE INJURY PAY 1,833.68
6,230.56
February 10, 1999
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE & ANNUITY DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 976.38
COMMISSIONER OF REVENUE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 203.00
DEPOSITORY TRUST COMPANY BOND PRINCIPAL 522,321.25
GREAT-WEST LIFE & ANNUITY DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 3,533.00
I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,590.65
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-401 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 245.98
ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 12,163.59
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 645.00
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,782.00
LINHOFF PHOTO & DIGITAL IMAGIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 31.18
MINNESOTA MUTUAL LIFE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 746.00
MN CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTE DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,800.93
MN STATE RETIREMENT SYSTEM DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,790.00
OLD REPUBLIC TITLE BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 45,000.00
PARK NATIONAL BANK DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 99,255.77
PERA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 47,069.77
74
PERA FIREMEN'S RETIREMENT ASSO DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 3,330.24
PERA POLICE RETIREMENT ASSOC DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 8,471.63
SLP ASSOC OF FIREFIGHTERS-LOCA DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 1,005.04
SLP CREDIT UNION DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 29,619.13
U S BANK BOND PRINCIPAL 3,905,503.26
USCM / MIDWEST DEDUCTIONS PAYABLE 6,881.16
WANZEK CONSTRUCTION INC. OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41,848.30
WOLDORSKY, RICHARD OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.00
4,735,838.26