HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001/09/04 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular 1
AGENDA - CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
September 4, 2001
7:30 p.m.
7:25 p.m. - Economic Development Authority
1. Call to Order
a. Pledge of Allegiance
b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
a. Proclamation declaring “Lyle Hanks Week”
3. Approval of Minutes
a. City Council Minutes of August 20, 2001
b. Study Session Minutes of August 13, 2001
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
4. Approval of Agenda and Consent Items
NOTE: Consent items are those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or
which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to
an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
a. Approval of Agenda
Action: Motion to approve (Alternatively, motion to add or remove items
from the agenda, motion to move items from consent to regular
agenda for discussion).
b. Approval of Consent Items
1. Motion to adopt resolution approving 2002-2006 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) and amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the CIP.
2
2. Motion to approve the ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Municipal Code
concerning employees of the City of St. Louis Park by deleting Chapter 3:
Personnel., approve the ordinance summary and authorize summary publication.
3. Motion to approve the six resolutions related to the Park Commons title clean up.
4. Motion to approve second reading of rezoning ordinance - Evan Johnson
(Thermetic Products Inc.) for a rezoning from R4 to C2 for the property located at
1409 and 1413 Colorado Avenue South; approve summary ordinance and
authorize publication. Case No. 01-38-Z
5. Resolutions to amend and correct resolution 00-69 granting approval of final PUD
and plat for Mill City Addition. Motion to adopt Resolution approving final PUD
for Mill City Addition. Motion to adopt Resolution approving final plat for Mill
City Addition.
6. Motion to adopt resolutions approving final payments listed below:
Allied Blacktop Company $ 75,390.93
Contract No. 43-01
Contract sealcoating
Thomas & Sons $ 26,759.59
Contract No. 71-00
Storm sewer ponds and lift stations
7. Motion to accept the following reports for filing:
a. Telecommunications Advisory Commission Minutes of may 10, 2001
b. Vendor Claims
Action: Motion to approve Consent Items
5. Public Hearings
5a. Public Hearing – Park Nicollet Private Activity Revenue Bond
This public hearing is to consider issuing Private Activity Revenue Bonds for Park
Nicollet Health Services
Recommended
Action:
Adopt preliminary resolution to issue Private Activity Revenue
bonds for Park Nicollet Health Care Services in an amount not to
exceed $10,000,000.
5b. Public Hearing to Consider Compensation of the Mayor and City
Councilmembers and Resolution revising salaries for the Economic
Development Authority President and Commissioners
First reading of an ordinance increasing the salaries of the Mayor from $9,200 to
3
$9,760 and Councilmembers from $6,000 to $6,365 and consideration of a
resolution increasing the annual salaries of the Economic Development Authority
President from $4,800 to $5,092 and Economic Development Authority
Commissioners from $3,600 to $3,819.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing.
1. Motion to waive the first reading of the ordinance modifying
Mayor and City Council member compensation, and set
second reading for September 24, 2001
2. Motion to adopt a resolution to modify Economic
Development Authority Commissioner compensation.
6. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public
7. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions
7a. Approve preliminary property tax levy, budget for the 2002 fiscal year, and
revisions to the 2001 adopted budget; and cancel the 1987A GO Improvement
bond levy
(Resolution approving the preliminary property tax levy and budget is required by
Truth in Taxation legislation. Information contained in the resolution will be used
in the individual tax notices prepared by the County.)
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the resolution that establishes the preliminary
tax levy and budget for 2002, approves revisions to the 2001
adopted budget, and cancels the 1987A GO Improvement Bond
levy.
7b. Resolution authorizing an HRA Levy
Council authorization of HRA level approved as item 7a of EDA agenda.
Recommended
Action:
Adopt resolution setting the HRA levy for 2002.
7c. Second Reading of an Ordinance deleting licensing of housing compliance
inspectors: City Code section 16-202.
Proposal to discontinue use of private licensed housing inspectors for home sale
inspections beginning January 1, 2002.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve 2nd reading of an ordinance deleting licensing
Section 16-202 in its entirety.
4
7d. The request of Jewish Community Center to change the zoning classification
at 4330 South Cedar Lake Road from R-4 Multi-Family Residential to R-1
Single Family Residential, Preliminary Plat and certain variances to permit
the expansion of a parking lot in association with a proposed building
expansion.
Case No. 01-34-Z, 01-35-PP, 01-36-VAR
Recommended
Action:
• Motion to approve first reading of rezoning ordinance and set
second reading for September 24.
• Motion to adopt resolutions approving the Preliminary Plat
and certain variances subject to the conditions and
stipulations listed in the resolutions.
7e. Amendment to resolution approving Final Plat and Final PUD for Park
Commons East Phase One to change the name of the north-south town green
streets to “Grand Place” and separate the plat and PUD resolutions.
Case No. 01-06-S and 01-07-PUD
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt resolutions amending the Final Plat street names
and approving the Final PUD and variances subject to the
conditions included in the resolutions.
8. Boards and Committees
9. Communications
10. Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make
arrangements, please call the Administration Department) at 952/924-2525 (TDD
952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
5
Item # 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
August 20, 2001
7: 30 p.m.
1. Call to Order and Roll Call
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The following Councilmembers were present at roll call: Jim Brimeyer, Chris Nelson,
Susan Sanger, Sue Santa, Robert Young, and Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Councilmember Ron Latz arrived at 7:35 p.m.
Also present were the City Manager (Mr. Meyer); City Attorney (Mr. Scott); Planning and
Zoning Supervisor (Ms. Jeremiah); City Engineer (Ms. Hagen); Superintendent of
Engineering (Mr. Moore); Environmental Health Official (Mr. Camilon); Planner (Mr.
Smith); Nature Center Manager (Mr. Oestreich); Activites Specialist (Ms. Kelser); Human
Resources Manager (Ms. Gohman); and Recording Secretary (Ms. Samson).
2. Presentations
a. Recognition for Eileen Baron Resolution No. 01-074
Upon her retirement, Inspections Department Secretary Eileen Baron was recognized for 26
years of service to the City of St. Louis Park. Mayor Jacobs presented a resolution to honor
Ms. Baron, and City Manager, Mr. Meyer, commented on Ms. Baron’s service to the City
and St. Louis Park residents.
b. Recognition for Darryl Sundberg Resolution No. 01-073
Upon his retirement, Battalion Chief Darryl Sundberg was recognized for 29 years of
service as a fire fighter, the last 3 ½ years as Battalion Chief, to the City of St. Louis Park.
Although Mr. Sundberg was unable to attend, Mayor Jacobs read the inscription on the
plaque to be presented to him.
c. Junior Naturalists Appreciation Presentation
Mr. Mark Oestreich, Westwood Nature Center Manager, and Ms. Sarah Kelser, Activities
Specialist, honored Junior Naturalists from Westwood Nature Center. A video of the Junior
Naturalists was shown.
3. Approval of Minutes
6
a. City Council Minutes of August 6, 2001
The minutes were approved as presented with the following changes:
Councilmember Young asked that cost be inserted on Page 10, Paragraph 3, Line 2
immediately after “would reduce”.
Mayor Jacobs correctly pointed out the spelling for the Junior Leader Coordinator is Patti
Hreno and not Reno (Page 1, Paragraph 3, Line 4).
b. Study Session Minutes of July 9, 2001
Councilmember Santa said Page 15, Paragraph 6 should read: “Councilmember Santa had
seen memorials designed by orphans of veterans that were very moving and suggested
contacting orphans of veterans groups, and other organizations, for their input on the design
of the memorial.”
4. Approval of Agenda and Consent Items
NOTE: Consent items are those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or
which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is
desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to
an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
a. Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve
the agenda.
The motion passed 7-0.
b. Consent Agenda
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve
the following Consent Agenda Items.
The motion passed 7-0.
1. Motion to approve extension of Frauenshuh’s Final PUD and Final Plat
consideration until November 30, 2001 – Case No. 99-19-PUD
2. Adopt Resolution No. 01-082 establishing a fee for shed permits and Ordinance
2202-01 authorize Miscellaneous Zoning Ordinance amendments to Sections
14:5-4.1(C)(7), 14:6-1.2(C)(5), 14:6-4.8(C)(3), and 14:8-2 to relocate the permit
requirements and add some flexibility for the construction of sheds under 120
square feet, require a time frame for the installation of driveways and landscaping
for one and two-family homes, make the Certificate of Occupancy section of the
7
Zoning Ordinance consistent with the recodification of the City Ordinance Code,
approve summary ordinance, and authorize publication.
3. Approve Ordinance 2203-01 amendment changing boundaries of zoning
districts, northern portion of property located at 2201 Edgewood Avenue, subject
to approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment by the Metropolitan Council,
approve summary ordinance, and authorize publication.
4. Authorize the City Manager to execute a new contract for 2001-2002 North
Hennepin Mediation Program Inc. for mediation, conciliation, information and
referral, and public education services for the remainder of 2001 and all 2002.
5. Approve an application for Temporary On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor License -
Holy Family Fall Festival, September 15 & 16, 2001, 5900 West Lake Street, St.
Louis Park.
6. Adopt Resolution No. 01-083 approving Temporary Parking Restrictions for the
Holy Family Fall Festival – Lake Street between Zarthan and Alabama Avenues
September 15 and 16, 2001.
7. Adopt Resolution No. 01-074 and Resolution No. 01-073 recognizing Eileen
Baron and Darryl Sundberg for their many years of dedicated service to the City
of St. Louis Park.
8. Designate Kovatch Mobile Equipment Corporation as the lowest responsible
bidder for one (1) Mini-Pumper for Rescue/Fire Suppression and to authorize
execution of a purchase agreement in the amount of $130,565.00.
9. Designate Ron Kassa Construction as the lowest responsible bidder and authorize
execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $48,349.50 for alley paving
– 2700 block Brunswick Avenue and the C.P. Railroad tracks. – Project No. 01-
18
10. Motion to accept the following reports for filing:
a. Planning Commission Minutes of August 1, 2001
b. Housing Authority Minutes of July 11, 2001
c. Vendor Claims
d. Human Rights Commission Minutes of July 18, 2001
e. Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Minutes of May 16, 2001
5. Public Hearings--None
6. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public--None
7. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions
7a. First Reading of an Ordinance deleting provisions for licensing of housing
compliance inspectors: City Code section 16-202.
8
Mr. Manny Camilon, Environmental Health Official, presented a report regarding licensed
housing inspectors. Mr. Camilon expressed a concern about the lack of consistency among
inspections in the last decade. Staff would like to add one full-time Environmental Housing
Inspector. Mr. Camilon said the benefits of bringing the program back into the realm of the
Department of Inspections are: offer of quality housing inspection services for a reduced
cost; scheduling and filling out of applications can be done simultaneously; offer of a 1-3
day response time for initial inspections or re-inspections; daily supervision of Staff and
training of more inspectors will provide timely, accurate, and consistent inspections; daily
use of one property maintenance code for all applications, e.g., point-of-sale, nuisance
complaints, or multi-family will hone the inspectors’ skills into more consistent inspections;
a housing inspector training guide book will be developed for continual reference; and
cross-training will significantly expand the department’s ability to provide quality service.
Mr. Lee Kness, 2800 Florida Avenue South, a professional inspector, addressed the Council
supporting the continued use of private, licensed housing inspectors for home sale
inspections. Mr. Neil Saltzman, 4205 Raleigh Avenue South, a private, licensed inspector
with the City, also spoke. Mr. Richard D. Olson, 113 Ninth Avenue S.E., a licensed
inspector, discussed liability, turn around, and pulling of inspectors’ licenses.
Councilmember Latz asked about inferior or questionable inspectors. Mr. Camilon said a
few inspectors made gross mistakes in the past. Mr. Meyer, City Manager, said the City
would have the same liability as private, licensed inspectors.
Councilmember Nelson said a 3-4 day notice for an inspection would be acceptable.
City Attorney, Tom Scott, said the City should have less potential liability than an
individual housing inspector; inspections are viewed as a public duty and not as a duty to a
particular individual requesting an inspection.
Councilmember Nelson supports the motion, however, he continues to recommend buyers’
inspections. Councilmember Sanger said she has received numerous complaints about
inconsistencies from inspector to inspector on the point-of-sale inspections. She said a 3-4
day notice for an inspection is acceptable. Councilmember Sanger stated there is a public
perception that inspectors may not be as forthcoming as they should be because referrals
from real estate agents may decrease, therefore, City inspectors would lend a greater air of
perceived neutrality to the process. She supports the motion.
Mr. Camilon suggested that fees be set later in the year.
Mayor Jacobs thinks the current ordinance is good, however, it merits some monitoring and
flexible hours need to be explored; he added inspections must be done consistently and
accurately.
9
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to approve
first reading of an ordinance deleting licensing Section 16-202 in its entirety, and to set the
second reading for September 4, 2001.
The motion passed 7-0.
Mayor Jacobs noted the date for the second reading is stated in the Agenda for September 6,
2001, however, Council will meet on September 4, therefore, the second reading will be
September 4.
7b. Approval of the City’s Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan
and Wetland Management Plan Resolution No. 01-077
Mr. Carlton Moore, Superintendent of Engineering, reported that within a few months
ordinances will be presented to the Council for consideration and an educational program
will be initiated for Staff and the public about the new Comprehensive Plan and the Wetland
Plan. The other phase of this project will include completion of the Storm Water
Improvement Projects. Most of the projects will be completed this year and some will carry
over into 2002.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Young, to adopt
Resolution 01-077 approving the City’s Comprehensive Water Resource Management Plan
and Wetland Management Plan.
The motion passed 7-0.
7c. First reading of Ordinance regarding Personnel Policies for City Employees
Resolution No. 01-078
Ms. Nancy Gohman, Human Resources Manager, said informational sessions were held for
St. Louis Park employees regarding personnel policies.
Councilmember Nelson said that during a Study Session there was a discussion regarding
the responsibilities of the City Manager position (Section 1A) and Council decided it does
not want to have any part of termination decisions. Hiring and termination decisions are to
be made at the City Manager’s discretion, however, Council would like input on department
head hires and possibly the interview process.
Mr. Meyer said the ordinance requires terminations to come before the Council on appeal
and the abolishment of that ordinance and its subsequent replacement by a resolution would
eliminate that particular provision; the provision relevant to department heads for both
confirmation of hiring and termination will continue because that language continues in the
Charter until such time as the Charter would be changed and, at that point, one could
provide for a different policy. Mr. Meyer said he thinks the Council will propose that the
Charter Commission delete those provisions, and Mr. Meyer would still like to have some
form of input from the Council on department head hires.
10
It was moved by Councilmember Santa, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to waive the
first reading of the Ordinance and to set the second reading for September 4, 2001, and to
approve Resolution 01-78 adopting personnel policies.
The motion passed 7-0.
7d. The request of CSM/Rottlund for a major amendment to the approved
Planned Unit Development for Pointe West Commons to add two townhomes
onto an existing building. Case No. 01-39-PUD Resolution No. 01-079
Mr. Patrick Smith, Planner, said CSM and Rottlund are requesting two additional
townhomes be added onto an existing building near the intersection of Zarthan Avenue and
16th Street. Development Staff and the Police Department have received about 25
complaints with regard to the construction activity at Pointe West Commons, and the
majority of the complaints concern construction activities taking place before 7:00 a.m. In
three of the 25 calls Staff responded to, the Applicant was in violation of the PUD
agreement. Rottlund was issued, and has paid, three citations. It has been proposed to
install signage stating permissible construction hours around the perimeter of the
development.
Mr. Gary Berscheid, 1604 Blackstone Avenue South, addressed the Council regarding
construction disturbances and he stated by the time the police arrive the equipment has been
loaded and the crew is gone. Mr. Berscheid reported that Rottlund stated a March 2002
completion date.
Mr. Michael Noonan, 3065 Centre Pointe Drive, Roseville, Rottlund Homes Officer, cited
two issues: the planning merits and the behavior of Rottlund and the reaction of the
community. Mr. Noonan stated the building is to be moved three feet but the move will be
imperceptible to residents on Alabama Avenue. The two additional townhomes will extend
the existing building by 22 feet, three feet on one side and 19 feet on the other side. Mr.
Noonan discussed the misbehavior of some people associated with the various construction
projects. He stated it is his personal responsibility to resolve residents’ complaints and
monitor the changes that have been made to comply with ordinances and minimize
disruptions for the neighborhood. Mr. Noonan said, barring an early winter, the physical
construction of the units will be completed by March 2002, and outside work, i.e., greens
and asphalt, will be done by August 2002.
Councilmember Sanger suggested that the conditions of the resolution be modified to
remove the word offending from the Section on Citations. She also suggested that a
condition be added that if City Staff determines that construction related activity continues
outside of approved construction hours, Rottlund will be required to provide a night security
guard, at Rottlund’s expense, to ensure that such violations do not continue.
Mr. Noonan asked Councilmember Sanger what would trigger that from an implementation
point-of-view. Councilmember Sanger responded if the complaints continued at the rate at
11
which they have been, it would be too many. Mr. Noonan said he believes Xcel Energy and
CSM are contributors to the disturbances. Councilmember Sanger said she would like to
leave the identification of the violator to the discretion of Staff.
Ms. Kathy Creger, 1637 Alabama Avenue South, stated her concern for children in the
neighborhood due to hurried and hasty construction drivers traveling on Alabama Avenue
for lunch or breaks to get to the store. She said several times, without notification, Alabama
Avenue has been blocked and school buses are unable to get through. Mr. Dan Hulke, 1600
Alabama Avenue South, supported Ms. Creger’s concerns. Mr. Terry Kisling, 1648
Blackstone Avenue South, told the Council about dump trucks and cements trucks at about
10:30 a.m. or 11:00 a.m. on Blackstone on Thursday and Friday mornings. Mayor Jacobs
suggested there be a greater police presence and enforcement. Mr. Alan Mayes, 1613
Blackstone Avenue South, said he is tired of the noise coming from the construction
projects. Ms. Sue Hempel, 1633 Blackstone Avenue South, reported an electrical box and
barricades on Zarthan Avenue are blocking drivers’ views.
Councilmember Latz noted that CSM has not yet signed the assent form agreeing to the
conditions of approval of the PUD amendment that was approved last February. Ms.
Jeremiah, Planning and Zoning Supervisor, said CSM was concerned that they would be
fined for violations that were actually the responsibility of Rottlund’s crews, but that has not
happened. She stated the word offending developer was added to the condition and the
offending developer would be fined for violations. City Attorney, Mr. Scott, said he thinks
the administrative penalty provision was added after the original development contract was
entered into, and CSM will sign the assent form if a distinction is made between offending
developer. Councilmember Latz is not in favor of making the distinction between offending
developer and he would like to see a condition of the approval—he will support the
approval tonight but only if CSM sign the agreement in its current form without the
additional language, i.e., the word offending.
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Young, to adopt
Resolution 01-079 approving the major amendment to the approved Planned Unit
Development subject to conditions listed in the resolution and with additional conditions as
directed by the Council.
The motion passed 7-0.
Major Jacobs said he supports the motion with the amendments.
7e. The request of Costco Wholesale for a major amendment to the approved
Planned Unit Development for Park Place Plaza to permit a 12-station
fueling facility and an accessory building on Lot 9.
Resolution No. 01-080
Mr. Patrick Smith, Planner, reported Council reviewed this project earlier and tabled the
item in order to provide the Applicant an opportunity to consult an SRF traffic consultant.
12
Mr. Jack Frank, 999 Lake Drive, Issaquah, WA, Director of Real Estate Development for
Costco, said Costco met with representatives from Arby’s, Home Depot, and with Staff to
address the congestion points. Mr. Ted Johnson, 899 Skokie Blvd., Northbrook, IL,
Executive Vice President of Planning, focused his discussion on the access points on Home
Depot’s property and the aesthetics of the 12-station fueling facility.
Ms. Marie Cody, SRF consultant, said the all-way stop intersection is a major operational
problem, however, SRF is not recommending any changes to the all-way stop. SRF
recommends removal of four parking spaces from Arby’s. Ms. Cody reported the SRF
recommendation for Gamble Drive Extension is to combine it into one access point. After
several questions from Councilmembers, Ms. Cody clarified the task assigned to SRF was
to identify traffic operational congestion and safety problems during the noon peak hours.
Mayor Jacobs proposed a condition to the PUD, i.e., the approval depends on the agreement
between Costco and Home Depot that Mr. Frank mentioned earlier, and Councilmember
Nelson interjected, as stated in 11G.
Councilmember Latz said he is satisfied with the proposed traffic plan and he would like to
make it a specific condition, and he is satisfied with the aesthetics.
Councilmember Sanger moved to adopt a resolution of denial for the major amendment to
the PUD. The motion died for lack of a second.
Councilmember Nelson recommended that section 11G of the resolution be modified to read
“shall implement the traffic improvements recommended by SRF,” and the language should
indicate that the first recommendation of SRF, the improvement to Lot 8, will be made by
Costco; the second is that the improvements will be made to Gamble Drive Extension
consistent with Plan 3.
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Brimeyer, to adopt
Resolution 01-080 approving the major amendment to the approved Planned Unit
Development subject to making changes to section he proposed to 11G.
Councilmember Brimeyer said he thinks the City should hold a letter of credit from Costco,
and Mr. Frank said a letter of credit is acceptable to Costco, however, Mr. Frank requested
the City distinguish between improvements and enforcement issues. Councilmember
Brimeyer added that the cash is only for the traffic improvements that Councilmember
Nelson put into amendment 11G. Councilmember Brimeyer stated if Costco receives a
Certificate of Occupancy, and improvements are not done, the City has Costco’s money.
Mr. Frank assured the Council that Costco is most willing to put up that security.
The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Sanger opposed).
7f. The request of Evan Johnson (Thermetic Products Inc.) for a Comprehensive
Plan amendment from Medium Density Residential to Commercial and a
13
rezoning from R4 to C2 for the property located at 1409 and 1413 Colorado
Avenue South. Case No. 01-37-CP and 01-38-Z. Resolution No. 01-081
Mr. Patrick Smith, Planner, provided a short history regarding the zoning for these
properties.
It was moved by Councilmember Young, seconded by Councilmember Nelson, to adopt
Resolution 01-081 approving a Comprehensive Plan amendment subject to approval by the
Metropolitan Council, approve summary and authorize publication, and approve first
reading of rezoning ordinance and set second reading for September 4, 2001, subject to the
approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment by the Metropolitan Council.
The motion passed 7-0.
8. Boards and Committees--None
9. Communications
From the Mayor—Mayor Jacobs commented on the Park Commons groundbreaking.
11. Adjournment
Mayor Jacobs adjourned the meeting at 11:30 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
14
Item # 3b
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
August 13, 2001
The meeting convened at 7:02 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Jim Brimeyer, Ron Latz, Chris Nelson, Susan
Sanger, Sue Santa, Robert Young, and Mayor Jacobs.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Meyer), Director of Community Development (Mr.
Harmening), Planning and Zoning Supervisor (Ms. Jeremiah), Human Resources Director (Ms.
Gohman), Human Resources Coordinator (Ms. Vieau), and City Clerk (Ms. Reichert).
1. Renaming of 38/39th Street
Mr. Harmening gave an overview of the survey that was sent to the condominium communities
involved and the response received. He identified the concerns of the associations and the
residents such as the cost of new association identification signs and the cost and time to change
addresses on personal documents. Staff suggested reimbursing the associations for the cost of
one sign.
It was suggested that Council choose a new name now with an effective date as far out into the
future as one year.
Staff suggested that a resource person be available to meet and provide consultation for the
associations and residents. This person would also provide a list of all considerations and steps
involved with a change of address. Mayor Jacobs felt that a staff resource would be a good idea.
Councilmember Sanger felt that the utility companies should be notified at one time for the
whole area affected. Councilmember Nelson agreed.
Councilmember Nelson asked Council to refer to the memo from Mr. Robert Jorvig that was in
support of names historic to St. Louis Park.
Councilmember Latz felt they should look at market research before making a decision and to
look at the economic viability.
Mr. Cunningham stated that it will be very difficult for all parties involved to come to an
agreement on the street name. He stated that the street names of Market and Grand evoke a
sense of daily activity and quality. Mr. Cunningham felt that Market and Grand was right for the
project. He mentioned that the street name Market was used in the PUD.
Councilmember Sanger felt people may be confused with the street name Grand in St. Paul. She
stated that the residential component must be remembered.
15
Mr. Harmening stated that it is common for developers to use their own discretion in street
renaming. He added that the developers are investing their money and will own all buildings.
He felt that it is best to let the developers do the renaming.
Councilmember Latz felt they should move more slowly so that the developers have more time
to work and cooperate with the city.
Councilmember Brimeyer wants a name that embodies St. Louis Park. Councilmember Sanger
inquired if staff and the developers should come back with more names.
Ms. Jeremiah suggested the street names of Excelsior and Grand may provide the theme both
Council and the developer are looking for. Mr. Meyer agreed with Ms. Jeremiah.
Councilmember Brimeyer suggested using Grand as the street name for the street that intersects
with Excelsior Boulevard. The two streets running parallel to Excelsior should be named Park
Commons Drive and Wolfe Park Boulevard.
2. Personnel Policy Update
Ms. Gohman gave a brief background of proposed changes as they relate to the recodification
process. A resolution adopting personnel policies and ordinance repealing Chapter 3 of the
municipal code dealing with personnel are proposed for Council approval.
Councilmember Sanger inquired why it would be necessary for Council to approve policy on
certain issues, such as benefits, holidays, leave, expense reimbursement, compensation, political
activity, and Council affected policies. Ms. Gohman replied that Council policy regarding
financial issues and issues directly affecting the Councilmember themselves should be set by the
Council to provide protection of employees and the City Manager.
Ms. Gohman asked Council for direction on appointment and dismissal of department heads.
Councilmembers Sanger and Brimeyer stated that they would support charter changes granting
the City Manager power to hire and dismiss department heads without Council approval,
providing they was still a process for Council involvement. Mr. Meyer and Ms. Gohman offered
to work on drafting new language on this to bring back to Council at a later date.
3. Compensation for Council members and EDA Commissioners
Council discussed the inability to automatically raise salaries or synchronize timing with regular
employee salary increases due to charter provisions. They agreed that the current policy of
reviewing Council salaries every two years prior to the local election was sufficient.
Council directed staff to come forward with an ordinance modifying Council salaries and post a
notice of public hearing.
4. Sale of City Land at Cedar Manor Lake
Councilmember Young would like Council to consider a proposal to sell some of the City owned
property along Cedar Manor Lake to allow for housing to be developed on the site.
16
Mr. Meyer presented a brief history of the city’s initial purchase of the property. Council
discussed potential public sentiment for or against development on the land. Councilmembers
did not feel they had sufficient information to make a decision at this time and directed staff to
do a review of the property to determine what portion of the site would be suitable for
development.
5. Communications
Mr. Meyer updated the Council on the Park Commons groundbreaking.
Councilmember Sanger inquired about the timeline for the surface water management plan and
wetland plan. Mr. Meyer stated that staff could assign more definitive dates to the plan.
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
17
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 5a
Meeting of September 4, 2001
5a. Public Hearing – Park Nicollet Private Activity Revenue Bond
This public hearing is to consider issuing Private Activity Revenue Bonds for Park
Nicollet Health Services
Recommended
Action:
Adopt preliminary resolution to issue Private Activity Revenue
bonds for Park Nicollet Health Care Services in an amount not to
exceed $10,000,000.
Background: Park Nicollet Health Care Services is requesting the City of St. Louis Park to
issue up to $10,000,000 in Private Activity Revenue Bonds. The proceeds of this issue will be
used to purchase equipment.
The application material was provided to the City Council at the August 27, 2001 study session.
Preliminary approval of the bond issue is being requested with final approval to follow at the
October 3, 2001 City Council meeting.
Recommendation: Motion to adopt preliminary resolution to issue Private Activity Revenue
bonds for Park Nicollet Health Care Services in an amount not to exceed $10,000,000.
Attachments: Notice of Public Hearing
Resolution granting preliminary authorization to issue bond
Prepared By: Jean D. McGann, Director of Finance
Approved By: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
18
RESOLUTION NO. 01-084
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AND
GIVING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL TO THE PROPOSED
ISSUANCE OF REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA
STATUTES, SECTIONS 469.152 THROUGH 469.165
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”) is a home rule city, duly
organized and existing under its Charter, the Constitution and laws of the State of Minnesota.
WHEREAS, under the Minnesota Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 469.152-469.165, as amended (the “Act”), each home rule charter or statutory
city of the State of Minnesota, including the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), is
authorized to issue revenue bonds to finance, in whole or in part, the costs of the acquisition,
construction, improvement, or extension of a revenue producing enterprise, whether or not
operated for profit; and
WHEREAS, Park Nicollet Health Services, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the
“Corporation”), has requested that the City issue one or more series of revenue bonds (the
“Bonds”) and loan the proceeds derived from the sale of the Bonds to the Corporation, pursuant
to the terms of a Loan Agreement between the City and the Corporation (the “Loan Agreement”)
to finance costs related to the acquisition of various assets and hospital improvements, including,
but not limited to, hospital and medical equipment, computer equipment, and hospital furniture
and to be located in Borrower-owned facilities at 6500 Excelsior Boulevard, 3800 Park Nicollet
Boulevard, 3850 Park Nicollet Boulevard, and 3900 Park Nicollet Boulevard, each in the City
(the “Project”); and
WHEREAS, Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
regulations promulgated thereunder, requires that prior to the issuance of the Bonds, this Council
approve the Bonds after conducting a public hearing thereon.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT:
Public Hearing.
At a meeting beginning at approximately 7:30 p.m. on Monday, October 1, 2001, the City
Council will conduct a public hearing on the issuance of the Bonds as requested by the
Corporation.
It shall be the Corporation’s responsibility to publish notice of the hearing in substantially
the form attached hereto as Exhibit A in the official newspaper and in a newspaper of general
circulation in the City once, at least fifteen days prior to the date of the public hearing.
19
Preliminary Approval.
1. The City hereby grants preliminary approval for the issuance of the Bonds for the
purposes referenced in this resolution and in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed
$10,000,000, subject to the approval of the Project by the Minnesota Department of Trade and
Economic Development (“DTED”), as required by the Act, and subject to the mutual agreement of
the City, the Corporation, and the initial purchaser of the Bonds as to the details of the Bonds and
provisions for their payment. In all events, it is understood, however, that the Bonds shall not
constitute a pecuniary liability or charge, lien or encumbrance, legal or equitable, upon any funds,
assets, taxing power or any other property of the City except the City's interest in the Loan
Agreement; and the Bonds, when, as, and if issued, shall recite in substance that the Bonds,
including interest thereon, are payable solely from the revenues received from the Loan Agreement
and other property pledged to the payment thereof, and shall not constitute general or moral
obligations of the City.
2. In accordance with Section 469.154 of the Act, the City may cooperate with the
Corporation in submitting the proposal for the financing of the Project to DTED, including the
execution of necessary documentation by City officials.
3. As requested by the Corporation, the law firm of Kennedy & Graven, Chartered may
serve as Bond Counsel and assist in the preparation and review of necessary documents relating to
the Project and the Bonds to be issued in connection therewith.
4. The Corporation shall pay to the City any and all costs incurred by the City in connection
with the Bonds or the financing of the Project, whether or not the financing of the Project is
approved by DTED, whether or not the financing is carried to completion, and whether or not the
Bonds or operative instruments are executed and delivered. The Corporation shall also comply with
the City’s deposit and fee policies respecting such revenue bond issues.
5. All commitments of the City expressed herein are subject to the condition that by
December 31, 2001, the City and the Corporation will have agreed to mutually acceptable terms and
conditions of the Loan Agreement, the Bonds, and of the other instruments and proceedings relating
to the Bonds and their issuance and sale. If the events set forth herein do not take place within the
time set forth above, or any extension thereof, and the Bonds are not sold within such time, this
resolution will expire and be of no further effect.
6. The adoption of this resolution does not constitute a guaranty or firm commitment that
the City will issue the Bonds as requested by the Corporation. The City retains the right in its sole
discretion to withdraw from participation and accordingly not to issue the Bonds, or issue the Bonds
in an amount less that the amount referred to herein, should the City at any time prior to issuance
thereof determine not to issue the Bonds, or to issue the Bonds in an amount less than the amount
referred to in paragraph 1 hereof, or should the parties to the transaction be unable to reach
agreement as to the terms and conditions of any of the documents required for the transaction.
20
7. With respect to eligible costs of the Project which may be paid by the Corporation
prior to the issuance of the Bonds and reimbursed to the Corporation from the proceeds of the
Bonds, this resolution is intended to be a reimbursement resolution and declaration of intent to
issue reimbursement bonds under Treasury Regulations, Section 1.150-2, as amended.
Effective Date. This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota on this 4th day of September
2001.
Jeff Jacobs, Mayor
(SEAL)
Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
21
EXHIBIT A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
PUBLIC NOTICE
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON THE ISSUANCE OF
REVENUE BONDS UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES,
SECTIONS 469.152 THROUGH 469.165, AS AMENDED, BY
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at a meeting of the City Council of the City of
St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), on Monday, October 1, 2001, beginning at 7:30 p.m. at
the St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, in St. Louis Park, Minnesota, the City
Council will hold a public hearing on a proposal that the City approve and authorize the issuance
by the City of its revenue bonds (the “Bonds”), in one or more series under the Minnesota
Municipal Industrial Development Act, Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165,
as amended (the “Act”), in order to finance costs related the acquisition of various assets and
hospital improvements, including, but not limited to, hospital and medical equipment, computer
equipment, and hospital furniture to be located in facilities located at 6500 Excelsior Boulevard,
3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard, 3850 Park Nicollet Boulevard, and 3900 Park Nicollet Boulevard,
each in the City (the “Project”). The facilities are owned by Park Nicollet Health Services, a
Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the “Corporation”). The maximum aggregate principal amount
of the proposed bond issue is $10,000,000.
The Bonds will be special, limited obligations of the City and the Bonds and interest
thereon will be payable solely from the revenues and assets pledged to the payment thereof. No
holder of any Bonds will ever have the right to compel any exercise of the taxing power of the
City to pay the Bonds or the interest thereon, nor to enforce payment against any property of the
City except money payable by the Corporation to the City and pledged to the payment of the
Bonds. Before issuing the Bonds, the City will enter into an agreement with the Corporation,
whereby the Corporation will be obligated to make payments at all times sufficient to at least pay
the principal of and interest on the Bonds when due.
All persons interested may appear and be heard at the time and place set forth above or
may file written comments with the City Administrator prior to the date of the hearing set forth
above.
Dated: September 4, 2001
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
SA140-58 (JU)
201782v.2
22
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 5b
Meeting of September 4, 2001
5b. Public Hearing to Consider Compensation of the Mayor and City
Councilmembers and Resolution revising salaries for the Economic
Development Authority President and Commissioners
First reading of an ordinance increasing the salaries of the Mayor from $9,200 to
$9,760 and Councilmembers from $6,000 to $6,365 and consideration of a
resolution increasing the annual salaries of the Economic Development Authority
President from $4,800 to $5,092 and Economic Development Authority
Commissioners from $3,600 to $3,819.
Recommended
Action:
Mayor to close public hearing.
1) Motion to waive the first reading of the ordinance modifying
Mayor and City Council member compensation, and set second
reading for September 24, 2001
2) Motion to adopt a resolution to modify Economic
Development Authority Commissioner compensation.
Background:
According to the City Charter, City Council compensation is set by ordinance following a public
hearing and becomes effective on December 1st following the municipal election. City council
compensation was last modified on January 1, 2000.
Compensation for the Economic Development Authority is set by resolution and was also last
modified on January 1, 2000. The purpose of this report is to update Council on current salaries
and to recommend an increase to be effective January 1, 2002.
Currently, the annual salaries of the Mayor and Councilmembers are $9,200 and $6,000,
respectively. An additional $3,600 is paid to Commissioners of the Economic Development
Authority with the President receiving $4,800.
The salaries of Councilmembers and EDA Commissioners are being reviewed at this time based
on the directive of Council. At the time when the salaries were last increased, Council asked
staff to review and adjust salaries in the fall of each municipal election year. It was requested
that the increase be consistent with the annual adjustment set for City employees. The annual
salary adjustment given to City employees for 2000 and 2001 was 3%. It is recommended that
the same increase of 3% for 2000 and 3% for 2001 be applied to the Mayor, Councilmembers,
EDA President and EDA Commissioners.
23
Recommendation:
Staff recommends that Council:
A. Adopt an ordinance increasing the annual salary of the Mayor from $9,200 to $9,760 and
councilmembers from $6,000 to $6,365 effective January 1, 2002.
B. Adopt a resolution increasing the compensation of the Economic Development Authority
president from $4,800 to $5,092 annually and commissioners from $3,600 to $3,819 annually
effective January 1, 2002.
C. Continue to review and adjust Council salaries in the fall of each municipal election year in
amounts similar to other City employees.
Attachments: Ordinance
Resolution
Prepared By: Durell Vieau, Human Resources Coordinator
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
24
ORDINANCE NO. __________
AN ORDINANCE SETTING SALARIES
FOR THE MAYOR AND COUNCILMEMBERS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF ST. LOUIS PARK ORDAINS:
Section 1. The annual salary of the Mayor shall be $9,760, and the annual salary of
each Councilmember shall be $6,365, until changed by ordinance as provided in Section 2.07 of
the St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect January 1, 2002.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
25
RESOLUTION NO. 01-085
AMENDING THE COMPENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENT
OF THE COMMISSIONERS OF THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WHEREAS, The Economic Development Authority of St. Louis Park, Minnesota was
officially established on September 19, 1988 by Resolution 88-134; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with the Economic Development Authority by-laws the Economic
Development Authority shall hold its regular meetings the first Monday of each month beginning
at 5:00 PM; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with Minnesota State Statutes Section 469.097 (4), a commissioner
including the president shall be paid for attending each regular or special meeting of the
Authority in an amount paid for compensation or reimbursement must be paid out of the
Authority’s budget,
NOW THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park to set the
compensation and reimbursement of the Commissioners of the Economic Development
Authority at an annual salary of $3,819 and the President at an annual salary of $5,092 effective
January 1, 2002.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
26
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 7a
Meeting of September 4, 2001
7a. Approve preliminary property tax levy, budget for the 2002 fiscal year, and
revisions to the 2001 adopted budget; and cancel the 1987A GO Improvement
bond levy
(Resolution approving the preliminary property tax levy and budget is required by
Truth in Taxation legislation. Information contained in the resolution will be used
in the individual tax notices prepared by the County.)
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt the resolution that establishes the preliminary
tax levy and budget for 2002, approves revisions to the 2001
adopted budget, and cancels the 1987A GO Improvement Bond
levy.
Background: The 2002 proposed budget and the 2001 revised budget were reviewed by the
City Council at the August 27, 2001 study session.
By law, the City Council must approve a preliminary tax levy and budget for 2002 and submit
the tax levy certification to the County by September 17, 2001. In addition, any levy that will be
cancelled must be submitted to the County by this same date. The County will mail out parcel
specific notices to affected taxpayers on or before December 14, 2001. Final action of the levy
and 2002 budget will not occur until the second Council meeting in December.
It is proposed that the preliminary levy certification be set at the maximum levy allowed by the
State. In addition, the City will levy for the 1999 General Obligation Bond, the PERA increase
from 2001 to 2002 and will enact an HRA levy. The HRA levy will be handled separately from
the City levy. In addition, the bond levy from the 1987A GO Improvement bonds will be
canceled based on Council action before 1994. The levy information is summarized on the next
page.
Due to legislative changes, the State will no longer provide HACA aid. This aid will be included
in the certified levy. In addition, for fiscal year 2002, the Truth in Taxation Public Hearing is not
required. Staff is recommending holding a budget hearing in December to discuss the proposed
2002 budget as well as the legislative changes. This will help clarify the budget status for, and
allow input from, the public as well.
Recommendation: Approve resolution setting the preliminary 2002 tax levy, 2002 budget,
2001 revised budget and canceling the 1987A GO Debt Levy.
Attachments: Levy summary
Resolution
Prepared By: Jean McGann, Finance Director
Approved By: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
27
City of St. Louis Park
Proposed Tax Levy
For fiscal year 2002, a total levy of $14,271,459 is proposed. This represents an increase of
approximately 6% to the general fund budget. The total levy helps to support the operations of
the General Fund, Park and Recreation operations and Park Improvements. A portion of the levy
is also dedicated to the retirement of General Obligation Debt.
Due to legislative changes, HACA aid is no longer considered a state aid. Instead, the City will
collect these dollars as part of the levy. The comparison below includes HACA received in 2001
as part of the 2001 total levy.
Levy 2000/2001 2001/2002
General Fund 10,235,004$ 11,018,825$
Parks and Recreation Fund 2,531,422 2,745,974
Park Improvement Fund 166,565 179,160
GO Debt 319,500 327,500
Total Levy 13,252,491$ 14,271,459$
28
RESOLUTION NO. 01-086
RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED 2001 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2002,
APPROVING PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 2002, REVISED BUDGET FOR 2001 AND
CANCELING 1987A GO DEBT LEVY
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by Charter and State law to approve a
resolution setting forth an annual tax levy to the Hennepin County Auditor; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes currently in force require approval of a proposed property tax
levy and a preliminary budget on or before September 15th of each year; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received the proposed budget document;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park
that the preliminary 2002 budget for all Governmental Funds, Enterprise Funds and Internal
Service Funds shall be as follows:
AVAILABLE RESOURCES:REQUIREMENTS:
Revenues:Appropriations:
General Property Taxes 14,274,699$ Personal Services 18,457,809$
Business License Permits 348,550 Supplies, Services and Other Char 19,861,053
Non-Business License Permits 1,705,500 Capital Outlay 3,332,833
Integovernmental 4,061,968 Transfers Out 1,546,629
Charges for Services 4,099,225
Fines, Forfeits and Penalties 289,000
Enterprise 8,968,695
Special Assessments 121,515
Miscellaneous 2,883,985
Refunds and Reimbursements 839,681
Transfers In 6,365,007
Total Revenue 43,957,825$ Total Appropriations 43,198,324$
Fund Balance/Reserves - January 1 36,605,510 Fund Balance/Reservices - Dec 31 37,365,011
Total Available 80,563,335$ Total Available 80,563,335$
and as supported by the detailed proposed budget document; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the requirement to hold a Public Hearing on this budget
have been waived for budget year 2002; and
29
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied in 2001, collectible in 2002 upon
the taxable property in said City of St. Louis Park for the following purposes:
General Fund $11,018,025
Parks and Recreation Fund 2,745,974
Parks Improvement Fund 179,160
G.O. Debt Service 327,500
Total $ 14,271,459
and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the 1987A General Obligation tax levy previously
certified to the County for collection is cancelled; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to
transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Hennepin County, Minnesota
and to the Local Government Aids/Analysis Division, Department of Revenue, State of
Minnesota as required by law.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
30
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item #7b
Meeting of September 4, 2001
7b. Resolution authorizing an HRA Levy
Council authorization of HRA level approved as item 7a of EDA agenda.
Recommended
Action:
Adopt resolution setting the HRA levy for 2002.
Background: At the August 27, 2001 study session, an HRA levy was discussed. The EDA is
required to approve this levy as well as the City Council. As outlined in the resolution, the HRA
levy cannot exceed .0144 percent of the taxable market value of the City. The City is allowed to
levy $433,371 based on the taxable market value. This number is less that the amount presented
at the study session due to new estimates on taxable and nontaxable property received from the
County. Staff will review the market values prior to presenting the final HRA levy amount in
December.
Recommendation: Adopt resolution setting the HRA levy for 2002.
Attachments: Resolution
Budget
Prepared by: Jean D. McGann, Director of Finance
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
31
RESOLUTION NO. 01-087
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE HRA LEVY FOR 2002
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the “EDA
Act”), the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park created the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority (the "Authority"); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the EDA Act, the City Council granted to the Authority all of
the powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of the
Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and
WHEREAS, Section 469.033, subdivision 6 of the Act authorizes the Authority to levy a
tax upon all taxable property within the City to be expended for the purposes authorized by the
HRA Act; and
WHEREAS, such levy may be in an amount not to exceed 0.0144 percent of taxable
market value of the City; and
WHEREAS, the Authority has filed its budget for the special benefit levy in accordance
with the budget procedures of the City; and
WHEREAS, based upon such budgets the Authority will levy all or such portion of the
authorized levy as it deems necessary and proper;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the St. Louis Park City Council:
1. That approval is hereby given for the Authority to levy, for taxes payable in 2002,
such tax upon the taxable property of the City as the Authority may determine, subject to the
limitations contained in the HRA Act.
Approved this 4th day of September, 2001, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park.
Its Mayor
ATTEST:
Its City Clerk
32
2001 Budget 2002 Budget
Revenue 1999 2000
Classification Actual Actual Adopted Revised Proposed Adopted
Intergovernmental -$ 318,906$ -$ -$ -$ 433,371$
Interest Income 556,334 831,687 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000
Miscellaneous 158,929 193,175 150,000 150,000 150,000 150,000
Transfers 14,799 - - - - -
Totals 730,062$ 1,343,768$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 900,000$ 1,333,371$
2001 Budget 2002 Budget
Expenditure 1999 2000
Classification Actual Actual Adopted Revised Proposed Adopted
Supplies/Services 335,509$ 411,283$ 583,190$ 498,582$ 507,860$ 941,231$
Capital Outlay 113,494 592,234 567,000 567,000 165,000 165,000
Transfers Out - 13,093 - - - -
Total Expenditures 449,003$ 1,016,610$ 1,150,190$ 1,065,582$ 672,860$ 1,106,231$
Summary of Revenues
Summary of Expenditures
City of St. Louis Park - Economic Development Authority
Development Fund
History of District
Budget Highlights
The Development Fund was created in 1996 as a source of financing to be used to foster and promote a wide
range of public and private development and redevelopment activities in St. Louis Park. The source of funds used
to create and maintain this fund consists of proceeds from the repayment of loans and other revenues such as:
the sale of real and personal property, recycled federal and state grants and other funds designated from time to
time by the City Council and EDA.
Funds are budgeted for EDA salaries. Various other expenditures are budgeted including funds for planning studies, an entry sign, and
Wolfe Park amphitheater improvements. The revenues associated with HRA Levy are also budgeted in the Development Fund. These
funds will be used for infrastructure improvements in redevelopment areas.
1999 2000 2001 2002
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1400000
1 2 3 4
History of Revenue History of Expenditures
1999 2000 2001 2002
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
1000000
1200000
1 2 3 4
33
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 7c
Meeting of September 4, 2001
7c. Second Reading of an Ordinance deleting licensing of housing compliance
inspectors: City Code section 16-202.
Proposal to discontinue use of private licensed housing inspectors for home sale
inspections beginning January 1, 2002.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve 2nd reading of an ordinance deleting licensing
Section 16-202 in its entirety.
Background:
At the August 20, 2001 City Council meeting, staff presented an ordinance to delete the City
code section establishing licensing of private housing compliance inspectors. This change will
result in City staff performing all of the inspections required for the sale of property beginning
January 1, 2002. Hiring of an additional Environmental Housing Inspector will be necessary and
funded by the permit fee. Council unanimously passed the first reading of this Ordinance.
Issues:
Licensed housing inspectors who attended the Council meeting offered comments and raised
some questions about the implications for the City assuming these additional inspections. Staff
emphasized that these inspections are only one part of the comprehensive property maintenance
program for the City. Staff also confirmed their commitment to taking this program into the
future and seeing it succeed. Three main questions were raised:
Q. By hiring one additional FTE, will the City will be able to provide prompt and consistent
inspections?
A. The City is hiring one additional housing inspector to join an existing team of 3
environmental housing inspectors. Schedules will be adjusted to accommodate the busy
seasons, providing prompt service. (The goal is to conduct initial inspections within 3-4
days.) Cross-training and strict adherence to a newly designed policy manual for point of
sale, multi-family, and property maintenance will improve consistency. A homeowner or
their agent can conveniently schedule the inspection time with the City while they make
permit application.
Q. If the City inspectors should miss an item in their inspections, will they be covered by
insurance, as is required of the private housing inspectors?
A. The City does carry insurance and some errors will likely occur with any inspection
process. However, the State limits the liability of a City when providing inspection
services for the good of the general public. The City's housing inspections are conducted
34
not for the sake of an individual seller or buyer, but for the purpose of maintaining
quality, code-conforming property in the City. Inspection records are public information
and available for potential buyers to examine. Buyers are encouraged to seek the help of
private housing inspectors before making a decision to purchase a house.
Q. Some private inspectors currently do inspections in the evenings and on weekends. Will
the City be able to match that service?
A. The City will consider flexible hours during the peak seasonal housing periods to
accommodate residents. It is questionable whether the City will support weekend
inspections. Based on the past annual numbers of housing inspections, most inspections
can be accomplished during regular work hours.
Summary:
In the tradition of the City of St. Louis Park being progressive and responsive to its citizens, this
ordinance begins the next evolutionary step in the 30-year history of property maintenance
initiatives.
Attachments: Ordinance deleting section 16-202
Summary Ordinance
Section 16.202
Prepared by: Manny Camilon, Brian Hoffman
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
35
ORDINANCE NO. 2205-01
AN ORDINANCE DELETING CHAPTER 16, ARTICLE II
SECTION 16-202 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
CONCERNING REQUIREMENTS FOR CONTRACTOR LICENSES FOR
HOUSING COMPLIANCE INSPECTORS
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Chapter 16, Article II, Section 16.202 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code is
hereby deleted in its entirety.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 2002.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
36
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO. 2205-01
This ordinance deletes Section 16.202 of the Municipal Code regarding licensing of Private
Housing Inspectors. This Ordinance shall take effect on January 1, 2002.
Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 12, 2001
37
ATTACHMENT
Section 16-202: Housing Compliance Inspector.
A. License Required. No person, other than a City employee, shall conduct housing
inspections of one and two family residential homes, as required by the City Code for a
Certificate of Housing Maintenance Compliance without first obtaining a license from
the City. Licenses shall be issued only to the individual actually performing the work.
B. Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement. The applicant must enter into a Hold
Harmless and Indemnity Agreement with the City of St. Louis Park, in a form acceptable
to the City, in which the applicant agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the City of St.
Louis Park from any claims, losses, judgments, damages, or costs incurred, including
attorney's fees, resulting from the issuance of the license and from the applicant's activities
as a housing compliance inspector for the City.
C. Competency Examination. A license will only be issued when the applicant proves
competency by achieving a passing score on a competency examination offered by the
City to potential Housing Compliance Inspectors on a semi-annual basis. If the applicant
fails to pass the test, they must wait until the next regularly scheduled test given by the
City. The City shall waive the examination requirement, provided the contractor holds a
valid license from the previous year and is in compliance with the continuing education
requirements of this Section.
D. Continuing Education. Each year the licensee must provide proof of attendance at a
minimum of three (3) hours of continuing education and a passing score from the annual
training/test house approved by the City before a new or renewal license will be issued
for the following year.
E. Insurance. Housing Compliance Inspectors are exempt from the insurance requirement
provided under Section 16-201(G)(1). Each applicant shall provide a certificate of errors
and omissions insurance or Housing Inspectors Professional Liability Insurance with a
company authorized to do business in the State of Minnesota in an amount of not less
than $250,000 per claim. The City of St. Louis Park shall be named as an additional
insured. The insurance must be maintained by the applicant for a minimum of three years
after expiration of the license for any reason including revocation or denial.
F. License revocation. A license may be revoked or denied by the City based on any or all
of the following performance criteria:
1. Complaints from homeowners regarding housing inspections and/or failure of the
Housing Compliance Inspector to respond to homeowner’s questions.
2. Failure to submit housing compliance inspection report and work orders to the
department of inspections within three (3) working days from the date of the
inspection.
38
3. Failure to write adequate work orders.
4. Failure to identify code violations on checklist and/or work orders.
5. Failure to accurately apply the requirements of the City Code related to the
housing compliance inspection program.
6. Failure to maintain a level of professionalism which reflects the City’s high
standards.
7. Failure to comply with or violation of the terms of this Chapter.
G. Private Inspector-Transmittal of Paper Work to City. Private Housing Inspectors shall
transmit a copy of the Housing Condition Report and Work Order to the Dept. of
Inspections within three business days from the date of inspection, excluding Saturdays,
Sundays and legal holidays. It shall be the responsibility of the Private Inspector to
guarantee receipt of such reports by the City.
39
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 7d
Meeting of September 4, 2001
7d. The request of Jewish Community Center to change the zoning classification
at 4330 South Cedar Lake Road from R-4 Multi-Family Residential to R-1
Single Family Residential, Preliminary Plat and certain variances to permit
the expansion of a parking lot in association with a proposed building
expansion.
Case No. 01-34-Z, 01-35-PP, 01-36-VAR
Recommended
Action:
• Motion to approve first reading of rezoning ordinance and set
second reading for September 24.
• Motion to adopt resolutions approving the Preliminary Plat
and certain variances subject to the conditions and
stipulations listed in the resolutions.
Background
The Jewish Community Center (JCC) is proposing a major building expansion to add 32
classrooms, library, music room, and computer lab. In addition, the JCC is proposing a 6,200-
square-foot expansion to the physical fitness center. They are also proposing to expand their
parking lot to the south and east and add a drop-off area north of the new expansion.
To accommodate the parking lot expansion, the Jewish Community Center (JCC) is buying a
piece of City land immediately south of their existing facility. The existing JCC property is
currently zoned R-4 Multiple-Family Residential, and the City-owned property is currently
zoned R-1 Single-Family Residential.
The JCC initially applied to rezone the City property to R-4; however, due to neighborhood
concerns with the proposed expansion of a Multiple-Family District, the JCC has agreed to
downzone their property from R-4 to R-1.
An existing trail on the City property would remain (a trail easement is a requirement of the
purchase). A portion near the cul-de-sac may be relocated.
The primary users of the new 62,000-square-foot addition would be the Minneapolis Jewish Day
School during days and the Talmud Torah during the evenings. The community center also
houses a nursery school, a teen center, senior citizen programs, physical fitness center,
auditorium, and offices.
On June 28, 2001, the applicant held a neighborhood open house. Approximately 20 residents
attended. One resident expressed concerns with the original building proposal that included a
metal finish on the top portion of the addition. Residents also expressed concerns or had
40
questions regarding potential impacts on the existing trail on the City property, speeding around
the JCC building, whether all the proposed parking is needed, light spillover on adjacent
properties, potential road connection to France Avenue, noise from the existing outdoor uses,
views and aesthetics of the proposed changes to the site.
On August 1, 2001, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the rezoning,
preliminary plat and variance requests. At the public hearing, residents voiced concern over the
removal of trees, idling cars and buses near their homes, and the height of the proposed building.
The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the JCC’s requests subject to the
conditions recommended by staff.
Issues:
How does the development impact the adjacent properties?
Are the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements being satisfied?
What are the existing non-conformities?
Analysis of Issues:
How does the development impact the adjacent properties?
The property that JCC is purchasing from the City is heavily wooded with boxelder and
cottonwood trees. Buckthorn shrubs are also heavily prevalent in this area. A wood-chip trail
traverses through the City-owned parcel connecting Cedar Lake Road with the Minneapolis Park
system. The applicant is purchasing this property in order to expand their parking lot. Eighty feet
of the woods will need to be cleared to accommodate the parking lot expansion. The resulting
parking lot is proposed to be 15 feet from the existing trail. Staff is recommending that the depth
of the parking stalls in the south lot be reduced from 20 feet to 18 ½ and 18 feet in order to move
the parking lot farthest away from the trail. This would increase the separation between the
parking lot and trail from 15 feet to 23 feet. The applicant is amenable to this suggestion and has
revised their plans accordingly.
The turn-around in the northwest corner of the site also requires the removal of a significant
number of trees. The applicant originally designed the turn-around so that it would abut the
sewer easement. Staff has concerns with the proximity of the turn-around with the old sewer
pipe. Engineering staff believes there is a high likelihood that the sewer pipe will need service in
the near future and any parking lot constructed near the pipe would have to be removed. In
addition, because only 10 feet is available for landscaping north of the sewer easement, staff
would suggest adding landscaping south of the easement if possible. Hence, staff recommends
that the applicant reduce the turning radius and driveway widths in order to move the turn-
around farther from the sewer easement. Again, the applicant is amenable to this
recommendation.
A traffic study and follow-up have been completed and reviewed by Public Works staff. The
existing street system is adequate to accommodate the proposed expansion.
41
Are the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance requirements being satisfied?
Dimensional Standards and Densities
The building expansion and proposed parking lot meet all setback requirements. However, the
proposed addition requires a building height variance. The maximum height in the R-1 zoning
district is 30 feet or 3 stories, whichever is less. The proposed addition is 44 feet in height. (See
variance analysis below.)
Architectural Design
The proposed building addition complies with the minimum Class I building material
requirements. The applicant originally proposed an architectural metal panel along the top 16
feet of the new addition. However, in response to neighbor concerns, the applicant has
redesigned the exterior with a combination of brick and stucco, both Class I building materials,
so the building will be comprised of 100% of Class I building material. The proposed building
meets the architectural building wall deviation standard.
Parking
The ordinance requires 509 parking stalls for the variety of uses of the Community Center. The
applicant is proposing 465 parking spaces that are 10-foot wide, as opposed to the City’s
minimum standard of 8 ½ feet. The JCC has submitted a proof-of-parking plan depicting 515
parking spaces if the lot was restriped with 9-foot wide parking stalls. Staff is comfortable with
the proposed parking and proof-of-parking plan.
Staff has also recommended eliminating one of the three access points at the main entrance to
reduce the number of points of conflict. By closing the middle access point, not only will the
number of conflict points be reduced, but this will also give the JCC an excellent opportunity to
provide a nice entrance sign/feature. JCC is amenable to this and has revised their plans.
Landscaping
The landscaping plan exceeds the bufferyard requirements along the west and north property
boundaries. The west bufferyard consists of overstory trees, evergreens, evergreen shrubs, and a
six-foot fence from the northern property boundary to the northern edge of the southern garage
on the adjacent property. All planting occurs within a 10-foot space between the adjacent
property and drive aisle.
The proposed north bufferyard mainly consists of autumn blaze maples, black hills spruce and
norway pines. A benefit of replacing the existing cottonwood and boxelder trees with the
proposed landscaping is the addition of evergreen trees that will add screening in the winter.
However, because the City is requesting the easement over the existing sanitary sewer line to be
expanded from 15 feet to 30 feet, only 10 feet remains for any bufferyard plantings along the
north property line. Staff would like to further evaluate with the applicant and adjacent residents
the possibility of leaving the existing tress and only augmenting the area with evergreen trees
42
where needed. Thus, the final landscaping plan may change depending upon the quality and
quantity of the existing trees. Staff is recommending additional landscaping south of the utility
easement if the turn-around can be moved far enough south to accommodate the additional
plantings.
The ordinance requires internal landscaping in proportion to the size of the parking lot. The
proposed Landscaping Plan represents 40% of the required amount of internal landscaping. Staff
is recommending additional trees in the parking islands. In addition, staff recommends adding as
many landscaped islands in the parking lot as possible while still meeting parking requirements
via the proof-of-parking plans. Any remaining landscaping needed to meet the requirement could
be planted in between the expanded parking lot and the trail.
Tree Preservation
The applicant is removing roughly 10% of the existing trees on site for this development. Under
the recently approved Tree Preservation Ordinance amendment, any tree removal that constitutes
less than 20% of the trees on site does not require any tree replacement. However, it should be
noted that their proposed landscaping would meet the required amount of replacement.
Subdivision Ordinance
A condition of approval is that the Plat be revised showing the perimeter utility easements
as required per ordinance. Also, the Subdivision Ordinance requires the installation of
sidewalks along all public roadways. Staff is recommending that a connection from the trail
to the pedestrian overpass be constructed.
Are the findings met for the proposed variance?
The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum 30-foot building height in the R-1, Single Family
Residential Zoning District. As mentioned, the applicant is requesting a 14-foot height variance
to allow the proposed addition to be 44 feet high. Section 14:8-3.3 (E) of the Zoning Ordinance
states that the Board of Zoning Appeals may grant variances from the strict application of the
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and impose conditions and safeguards provided that:
1. Where by reason of narrowness, shallowness, or shape of the lot, or where by reason of
exceptional topographic or water conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional
conditions of such lot, the strict applications of the terms of this ordinance would result
in a peculiar and practical difficulties or exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner
of such lot in developing or using such lot in a manner customary and legally permissible
within the zoning district in which said lot is located.
The extraordinary conditions of this lot are that it is much larger than a typical R1 lot (the
minimum lot size is 9,000 square feet and the new JCC lot is approximately 26 acres in size).
Therefore, the impacts of a taller building on adjacent properties are minimal. The building is
200 feet from the nearest single-family home. Another unusual circumstance is that the property
is already developed as a school/community center with an existing auditorium that is 54 feet
43
tall. Schools and community centers are legally permissible uses in the R1 Zoning District and
typically require taller building heights compared to single-family residential construction.
Therefore, it would create an undue hardship to limit the height to the maximum allowed for a
single-family home. Staff believes this finding has been met.
2. Conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such property or
immediately adjoining property and so not apply generally to other land or structures in
the district in which said land is located.
The educational use is unique to this area, as is the size of the parcel. Because of the significant
size of the parcel, the proposed addition will be located some 200 feet from the nearest single
family home. Staff does not believe that the additional 14 feet of building height would create
any adverse affects on the surrounding properties.
Moreover, although permitted, an educational facility is not the typical use in the residential
district. It is hard to accommodate all of the residential restrictions and performance standards,
and still meet the functional needs of the school. Three-story school buildings, like the proposed
addition, and taller auditoriums are very common in St. Louis Park and in other R1 zoning
districts.
3. The granting of the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant.
Staff agrees with the applicant that an educational facility needs to grow in order to provide for
the students’ needs. The additional height is not a significant increase for a use like this on a
large property, but would be for a single-family dwelling in close proximity to other homes. The
height of this building is necessary in order to make it function properly as a school. Staff
believes that this criterion has been satisfied.
4. The granting of the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to the
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets, increase
the danger of fire, or endanger the public safety.
The addition will not impair the light or air supply to the surrounding properties. The addition is
over 200 feet from the nearest single family home.
5. The granting of the variance will not unreasonably impact on the character and
development of the neighborhood, unreasonably diminish or impair the established
property values in the surrounding area, or in any other way impair the health, safety,
comfort, or morals of the area.
Staff believes since the proposed addition does not exceed the height of the existing building the
project will not unreasonably impact the character of the neighborhood, nor would it diminish
44
the established property values in the area. Again, three-story school buildings and taller
auditoriums are common in St. Louis Park in residential areas and do not impair the established
property values in the surrounding areas.
6. The granting of the variance will not be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance or
Comprehensive Plan.
The intent of the code is to minimize the height of adjacent buildings to keep sight lines intact
and to ensure the amount of light and air is not reduced. Since this building will be located over
200 feet from the nearest single-family property, staff believes that the intent of the code is being
met. Also, the addition at 44 feet does not exceed the height of the existing building at 54 feet.
Therefore, staff believes that this criterion has been satisfied.
7. The granting of the variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but
is necessary to alleviate demonstrable undue hardship or difficulty.
Under the current zoning, R4, a maximum building height of 40 feet is permitted. Thus, if the
applicant retained the current zoning of the property, the proposed 44-foot high addition would
only require a 4-foot variance. However, because the applicant is following the recommendation
by staff of requesting a downzoning of the property to R1, the proposed addition requires a 14-
foot variance. Thus, staff believes that the proposed variance will not serve as a convenience to
the applicant but is necessary because of staff’s recommendation and because typical school
buildings are three stories in height. Staff also believes it would create undue hardship to limit
the height of the auditorium if it ever needed to be rebuilt. Therefore, staff believes that this
criterion has been satisfied.
What are the existing non-conformities?
The existing building has a number of non-conformities. First, the building does not meet the 50-
foot setback from residential properties: the building is 35 feet from the Cedar Lake
Condominium property to the west. Second, the building does not meet the R-4 zoning district’s
maximum height limit of 40 feet: the auditorium is 54 feet in height. Staff has researched case
files and cannot find documents regarding the non-conforming height. Third, the building does
not meet the Class I building material requirement. Finally, the building does not meet the
building wall deviation requirement.
Staff supports granting a variance for the height of the auditorium only (based upon the same
analysis used for the addition) and leaving the other three issues as non-conformities. If the
building is destroyed by fire or natural disaster, staff believes a new building should be able meet
the ordinance regulations for setback and architectural requirements. However, an auditorium is
typically higher than the 30 feet allowed in the R-1 zoning district, and staff would suspect if
another auditorium would be built it would have to exceed the 30-foot limit.
45
In general staff prefers amending the ordinance to granting a variance for common variance
requests like school auditoriums in residential zoning districts. Benilde St. Margaret’s recently
received a similar height variance for their auditorium. Auditoriums have become a common
element of a school’s curriculum, and staff believes that the Zoning Ordinance should be
amended in the future accordingly. Variances, on the other hand, should only be granted when
necessary to preserve a substantial property right or when the property owner cannot put the
property to reasonable use due to a unique hardship or condition pertaining to the land or
structure. Based upon the current ordinance, size of the lot, and existing use, staff believes the
variance is warranted.
Recommendation:
Motion to adopt an ordinance approving the rezoning of the subject property from R4 – Multi-
Family Residential to R1 – Single Family Residential for JCC.
Motion to adopt a resolution approving the Preliminary Plat of Cedar Woods Addition subject to
the conditions listed in the proposed resolution and a resolution approving the building height
variances from 30 feet to 44 feet for the new addition and from 30 feet to 54 feet for the
auditorium section of the existing building in accordance with the Findings of Fact outlined in
the proposed resolution.
Attachments:
• Development Plans
• Proposed Ordinance
• Proposed Resolution
• South Tyrol Hills Neighborhood Association’s letter
• Ross Moen’s letter
Prepared by: Patrick Smith, Planner
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
46
ORDINANCE NO. __________
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS
4330 SOUTH CEDAR LAKE ROAD
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance adopted December 28, 1959,
Ordinance No. 730; amended December 31, 1992, Ordinance No. 1902-93, as heretofore
amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning district boundaries by reclassifying
the following described lands from their existing land use district classification to the new land
use district classification as indicated for the tract as hereinafter set forth, to wit:
See Attached Legal Description - Exhibit A
from R-4 Multi-Family Residential to R-1 Single Family Residential
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Adopted by the City Council
September 24, 2001
Reviewed for Administration
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
47
RESOLUTION NO. 01-088
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCES FROM SECTIONS 14:5-4.2 F(1) OF THE
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT
A 44-FOOT HIGH CLASSROOM ADDITION AND A
54-FOOT HIGH EXISTING AUDITORIUM
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-1 DISTRICT AT
4326 SOUTH CEDAR LAKE ROAD
4330 SOUTH CEDAR LAKE ROAD
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. The Jewish Community Center has applied for variances from Section 14:5-4.2 F(1) of
the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a 44-foot high classroom addition and
54-foot high existing auditorium instead of the required 30-foot height regulation for
property located in the R-1 District at the following location, to-wit:
See Attached Exhibit “A”
2. On August 1, 2001 Planning Commission held a public hearing, received testimony from
the public, discussed the application and recommended approval of variances.
3. The Planning Commission has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values of property in
the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and surrounding property, it is possible to
use the property in such a way that the proposed variance will not impair an adequate
supply of light and air to the adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in
the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably
diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary to
the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or
structures in the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to
the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
48
7. Approval of building height variance from 30 feet to 44 feet is recommended for the new
addition and from 30 feet to 54 feet for the existing auditorium in accordance of the
following Findings of Fact:
a. The existing building at 54 feet is higher than the proposed addition.
b. The addition and existing auditorium will not impair the light or air supply to the
surrounding properties.
c. The building is over 200 feet from the nearest residential home.
d. Although educational facilities are permitted uses in the R-1
zoning district, it is hard to accommodate all of the residential restrictions and
performance standards and still meet the functional needs of the school. Three-
story school buildings and taller auditoriums are very common in St. Louis Park.
8. The contents of Planning Case File 01-36-VAR are hereby entered into and made part of
the public hearing record and the record of decision of this case.
9. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this variance shall be deemed to be abandoned, revoked, or
canceled if the holder shall fail to complete the work on or before one year after the
variance is granted.
CONCLUSION
The application for the variance to permit a 44-foot high classroom addition and the 54-foot
existing auditorium in the R-1 Zoning District is granted based upon the finding(s) set forth
above.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 5, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
01-36-VAR:N/RES
49
RESOLUTION NO. 01-089
RESOLUTION GIVING APPROVAL FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT OF
CEDAR WOODS ADDITION
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. The Jewish Community Center, owners and subdividers of the land proposed to
be platted as Cedar Woods Addition have submitted an application for approval of preliminary
plat of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park
Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder.
2. The proposed preliminary plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with
the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the
ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park.
3. The proposed plat is situated upon the following described lands in Hennepin
County, Minnesota, to-wit:
See Attached Legal Description
Conclusion
1. The proposed preliminary plat of Cedar Woods Addition is hereby
approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all
ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the
State of Minnesota, subject to the following conditions:
a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official
exhibits, which shall be modified to meet the following conditions:
Preliminary Plat, stamped and received on 7/2/01 with the following
modifications:
i. The sanitary sewer easement shall be increased from 15 feet to 30 feet from the
west property boundary to the wetland.
ii. Perimeter utility easements shall be depicted on the final plat in accordance
with the Subdivision Ordinance.
50
c. Site Plan, stamped and received on 7/2/01 with the following modifications:
i. The turn-around in the northwest corner of the site shall be moved farther away
from the utility easement.
ii. A sidewalk shall be shown and constructed connecting the trail to the pedestrian
overpass on Cedar Lake Road.
d. Elevations, stamped and received on 7/27/01 modified showing stucco in place of metal.
e. Preliminary Grading Plan, stamped and received on 7/2/01
f. Preliminary Utility Plan, stamped and received on 7/2/01 modified and submitted to the
Fire Department for review and approval.
g. Landscape Plan, stamped and received on 7/2/01 with the following modifications:
i. Additional islands and landscaping shall be placed in the parking lot islands.
ii. Additional landscaping should be added between the utility easement and
driveway in the northwest corner of the site if possible.
iii. Any remaining landscaping needed to meet the internal landscaping requirement
should be placed between the parking lot and the trail on the south side of the site.
2. Prior to any site work, the following conditions shall be met:
a. The final plat shall be submitted and approved.
b. Trail easement shall be approved by City Attorney.
c. Development agreement shall be executed, unless the City Attorney waives this
requirement.
d. JCC shall close on the City owned property.
e. The applicant shall receive Watershed District approval.
3. Prior to issuance of a building permit, which may impose additional conditions, the
following conditions shall be met:
a. The applicant shall submit evidence of recording the final plat and easements.
b. A lighting plan and photometrics meeting the Ordinance regulations shall be
submitted to and approved by the Community Development Department.
51
4. Outlot A shall be retained by the City.
5. The applicant shall dedicate a trail easement in favor of the City pursuant to the requirements
of the purchase agreement.
6. The Final Grading/Drainage and Utility Plans shall reflect any changes requested by the City
Engineer in the course of her review.
7. A fence permit shall required prior to the installation of the proposed fence and the design of
the fence to be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Department staff.
8. Rooftop equipment shall be screened from adjacent properties.
9. Applicant shall relocate the existing trail traversing the south side of the property and
construct a new sidewalk connecting said trail to the Cedar Lake Road pedestrian bridge
prior to issuance of Occupancy Permit. Applicant shall submit sidewalk specifications to
Public Works for review and approval.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
52
City of St. Louis Park
City Council Agenda Item # 7e
Meeting of September 4, 2001
7e. Amendment to resolution approving Final Plat and Final PUD for Park
Commons East Phase One to change the name of the north-south town green
streets to “Grand Place” and separate the plat and PUD resolutions.
Case No. 01-06-S and 01-07-PUD
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt resolutions amending the Final Plat street names
and approving the Final PUD and variances subject to the
conditions included in the resolutions.
Background:
On June 4, 2001, the City Council approved TOLD’s Preliminary Plat/PUD with variances to
construct 660 housing units, 37,500 square feet of office, and 82,200 square feet of retail in a
phased project subject to certain conditions of approval. On June 16, 2001, the City Council
approved an ordinance vacating certain streets, an alley, and sidewalk easement in Park
Commons East subject to recording the final plat.
On July 23, 2001, the City Council approved the Final Plat and Final PUD for Phase One, which
includes approximately 350 apartment units and 63,000 square feet of retail/restaurants in 4-story
buildings with below ground and ramp parking. The town green and all of the new streets are
also included as part of Phase One construction.
The Final Plat approval included names for certain new streets in Park Commons East. “Market
Avenue” was the name approved for the one-way, north-south roadways on either side of the
new town green. Other new names included Meridian Lane for a new north-south connection
between Excelsior Blvd. and 38th Street, Princeton Lane for a new north-south connection
between Excelsior Blvd. and 39th Street, and Wolfe Parkway for the new park edge road. The
Final Plat has not yet been recorded with the County, so the new street names are not yet in
effect and can be amended by resolution rather than ordinance.
The developer had also requested that 38th/39th Street be renamed, but the Final Plat approval
included a condition requiring the plat documents to show the current name of 38th/39th.
However, the City Council did express an interest in renaming the street and directed staff to
send a survey to residents asking for feedback on the proposal and potential alternative names.
During Study Sessions on August 13 and August 27, 2001 the City Council considered the
results of the survey and some follow-up work submitted by residents. The Council discussed
new names for both 38th/39th Street and Market Avenue. Although there was not unanimous
agreement, the Council directed staff to amend the Final Plat resolution to rename Market
53
Avenue to “Grand Place”. The Council further directed staff to begin processing an ordinance
and to hold a public hearing to consider renaming 38th/39th Street to “Park Commons Drive”.
The ordinance will be considered separately in the near future. Notices of that proposal will be
sent to all affected property owners.
Based upon difficulties in amending Final Plat resolutions once they have been filed, staff and
the City Attorney are also recommending separating the Final Plat resolution from the Final PUD
and variances resolution. That way, if we have to amend the PUD in the future, we will not
encounter difficulty recording the amended PUD resolution.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends amending the Final Plat and Final PUD resolution for Park Commons East to
change the name of the north-south town green streets from “Market Avenue” to “Grand Place”
and to separate the Final Plat and Final PUD resolutions.
Attachments:
Proposed Amended Final Plat Resolution
Proposed Final PUD and Variances Resolution
Prepared by: Janet Jeremiah, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
54
RESOLUTION NO. 01-090
Amends and Restates Resolution No. 01-065
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 01-065 ADOPTED ON JULY 23, 2001
APPROVING A FINAL PLAT - PARK COMMONS EAST
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat on June 4, 2001, Resolution
No. 01-049; and
WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Final Plat for Park Commons East was
received on January 16, 2001 (accepted as complete application on May 9, 2001) from the
applicant, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final Plat at the meeting of July
11, 2001, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat on a 6-
0 vote with all members present voting in the affirmative, and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Final Plat for Park Commons East on July 23,
2001, Resolution 01-065,
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission
minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments
in the record of decision.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. TOLD Development Company , and the City of St. Louis Park, owners and subdividers of the
land proposed to be platted as Park Commons East have submitted an application for approval of
final plat of said subdivision in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park
Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder;
for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
See Attached Legal Description
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 01-06-S) and the effect of the proposed Plat on the health, safety and
welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the
effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive
Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
55
3. The City Council has determined that the Plat will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it
cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property
values. The Council has also determined that the proposed Plat is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested
modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7.2(E).
4. The contents of Planning Case File 01-06-S are hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Final Plat at the location described is approved based on the findings set forth above and
subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used, and maintained in conformance with the Final PUD
official exhibits, which may be amended according to the provisions of the planning
contract between TOLD and the City of St. Louis Park and to meet the conditions of
Final PUD approval. The Final Plat shall be amended prior to recording to change the
name of the north-south town green streets to “Grand Place” and to keep the current
name of 38th/39th Street.
2. Outlots A, B and C of the Park Commons East Final Plat shall be retained by the City of
St. Louis Park for public purposes.
3. Future phases shown as Outlots D, E, F, G, H, and I on the Park Commons East Final
Plat must receive subsequent preliminary and final PUD and plat approval, including
approval of condominium lots, prior to construction of any permanent improvements on
those properties. Interim parking and transit facilities are permitted on Outlots D, E, F, G,
H, and I provided City approval is obtained and any necessary access easements or
agreements are executed.
4. All street right-of-way (R.O.W.) shall be dedicated to the City or Hennepin County as
shown on the Park Commons East Final Plat; an ordinance vacating existing City streets,
an alley, and an existing sidewalk easement along Excelsior Boulevard shall become
effective upon recording of the Final Plat.
5. Prior to the City signing the Final Plat:
a. A sidewalk easement shall be executed which retains that portion of the developable
lot between the building face and public right-of-way for public sidewalk purposes.
b. A planning contract shall be executed between the City and developer which
addresses at a minimum: final plat/PUD and construction phasing; interim use and
maintenance plans for future phase outlots, construction of permanent public
improvements and temporary sidewalks, provisions for ensuring adequate parking,
conditions for administrative approval of amendments to the official exhibits, terms
for meeting tree replacement requirements.
6. The Park Commons East Final Plat approval includes the following variances to the
Subdivision Ordinance:
56
a. Street right-of-way and street sections shall be as shown on the approved final
plat; street names may include the word “park” subject to final plat and PUD
approval.
b. Drainage and utility easements shall not be required around the perimeter of all
lots.
c. Lots sizes in future phases may be less than the “R-C” Zoning District
requirement subject to any conditions of subsequent preliminary and final
PUD/Plat approval.
7. The developer is required to comply with all provisions of the planning contract,
development agreement with the EDA, Metropolitan Council LCDA grant agreement(s),
MPCA and Watershed District approvals.
8. Specific responsibility for financing and construction of the following required Phase 1
improvements shall be addressed by the Planning Contract:
a. construction of all streets, on-street parking, and utilities, within the entire PUD
area.
b. completion of streetscape improvements, including bicycle and transit amenities,
adjacent to all Phase 1 properties and Wolfe Park.
c. construction of temporary bituminous sidewalks in accordance with a plan
approved by the Zoning Administrator.
d. regrading of the southern portion of Wolfe Park, relocation/reconstruction of the
existing trail, and construction of the park edge road, parking, approved hard
surface sidewalk between parking and trail, plantings and streetscape subject to
approved final plans.
e. construction of the entire town green from Excelsior Boulevard to Wolfe Park in
accordance with approved final town green plans with temporary sidewalks north
of 38th/39th until permanent sidewalks/streetscape are completed during
construction of each future phase.
f. construction of the Phase 1 public parking ramps in accordance with approved
final plans.
g. construction of the police substation and public restrooms in accordance with
approved final plans.
h. construction of traffic improvements and installation of traffic control and
directional signage in accordance with approved final plans.
i. construction of 18 project-based two-bedroom Section 8 units in accordance with
public housing agreements.
9. Prior to any site work other than demolition for Park Commons East Phase One:
a. the Final Plat and PUD for Phase 1 shall be approved and the Final Plat shall be
signed by the City.
b. final construction documents for public infrastructure (street, underground
utilities; not streetscape) improvements shall be approved by the Public Works
Director.
c. required erosion control permits, utility permits, and other required permits shall
be obtained from the City, Hennepin County, Watershed District and any other
required agencies.
57
d. the MPCA shall be informed of the plans to regrade the southern portion of Wolfe
Park and approval shall be received prior to regrading the park, if needed.
e. a final tree preservation plan shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator and
any necessary construction fencing shall be in place.
f. plans for maintaining access to existing private condominium parking during
construction shall be approved by Public Works and the affected property owners,
if temporary construction easements are necessary.
11. Prior to issuance of any building permits, which may impose additional conditions:
a. Evidence of recording the final plat, easements, and planning contract shall be
submitted to the City.
b. the Indirect Source Permit shall be approved by the MPCA, if necessary.
c. A lighting and photometric plan shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
d. An irrigation plan shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
e. Exterior building material/colors shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
f. Final plans for a police substation and adjacent public restrooms shall be
approved by the Police Chief and Community Development Director.
12. Future phases of the Final Plat and PUD are approved in general concept only and subject
to the following conditions of approval:
a. All future phases are required to apply for subsequent Preliminary and Final Plat
and PUD approval for those phases; such Preliminary and Final approval may be
considered concurrently subject to Code and any pertinent provisions of the
development agreements.
b. Curb cuts, permanent sidewalks and streetscape adjacent to future phases shall be
completed during construction of each future phase.
c. A minimum of 35 stacked townhomes for owner-occupants shall be included in
Future Phase E and/or Future Phase NE; additional condominiums and changes to
proposed building height may be approved for Future Phase NE based upon
recommendations of a market study.
d. The City may consider proposals for permanent use of Future Phase W, subject to
the provisions in the existing development contract between TOLD, EDA and
City, either on its own or combined with potential redevelopment of the property
to the west. However, the City may retain the Future Phase W property
indefinitely and use it for such uses as the City may deem appropriate, including
potential transit and parking uses.
e. Variances to the 80 feet minimum lot width of the “R-C” District may be
approved subject to Preliminary and Final Plat and PUD approvals.
f. Allowable Code deviations are subject to the approved Redevelopment Plan and
future Preliminary and Final PUD approvals.
g. Approval for construction of future phases is contingent upon provision of
adequate parking, which may include interim parking as approved by the City,
and must include 75 weekday and 200 evening/weekend parking spaces, in excess
of other needs of the development, for town green and Wolfe Park uses.
13. Prior to execution of the Final Plat for each subsequent phase:
a. preliminary and final plat/PUD approval shall be obtained for that phase.
b. the existing development agreement shall be amended as necessary and a new
planning contract shall be executed between the developer and City/EDA.
58
c. public sidewalk easements shall be approved by the City Attorney for those areas
of private development lots between the public street and building setback.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
59
RESOLUTION NO. _____________
Amends and Restates Resolution No. 01-065
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 01-065 ADOPTED ON JULY 23, 2001
APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION
14:6-7 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR
PROPERTY ZONED “M-X” MIXED USE, “R-C” MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL, AND “R-3” TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED EAST OF THE
BALLY’S PROPERTY AT QUENTIN AVENUE, WEST OF MONTEREY DRIVE, AND
NORTH OF EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD TO THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF WOLFE
PARK, COMMONLY KNOWN AS PARK COMMONS EAST
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Preliminary PUD on June 4, 2001,
Resolution No. 01-049; and
WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for
Park Commons East was received on January 16, 2001 (accepted as complete application on
May 9, 2001) from the applicant, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD at the meeting of July
11, 2001, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final PUD on a 6-
0 vote with all members present voting in the affirmative, and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Final PUD for Park Commons East on July
23, 2001, Resolution 01-065,
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission
minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments
in the record of decision.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. TOLD Development Company has made application to the City Council for a Planned Unit
Development under Section 14:6-7 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the M-X, R-C,
and R-3 districts located east of the Bally’s property at Quentin Avenue, west of Monterey
Drive, and north of Excelsior Boulevard to the southern portion of Wolfe Park, commonly
known as Park Commons East for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
Lot 1, Block 1; Lot 1 Block 2; and Outlots A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H, Park Commons East
60
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 01-07-PUD ) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety
and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the
Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it
cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property
values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested
modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7.2(E).
4. The contents of Planning Case File 01-07-PUD is hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Final Planned Unit Development at the location described is approved based on the findings
set forth above and subject to the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used, and maintained in conformance with the Final PUD
official exhibits, which may be amended according to the provisions of the planning contract
between TOLD and the City of St. Louis Park and to meet the conditions of Final PUD
approval.
a. to address the recommendations of the Public Works Department dated 7/3/01.
b. to address the Plumbing Inspector’s comments dated 7/2/01.
c. to preserve the trees on the north side of 38th Street (proposed Grand Place) in front of
Westmoreland Hills condominiums.
d. to increase the length of the median at Market Avenue and Excelsior Boulevard per
the recommendation of the traffic consultant.
e. to meet minimum tree replacement ordinance requirements (that are not related to a
cash in lieu payment).
f. to coordinate town green and public streetscape improvements with Excelsior
Boulevard streetscape plans and input from the selected artist consultant.
g. to coordinate park edge improvements with amphitheater plans.
h. to address comments from Metro Transit regarding transit locations and
improvements.
i. to address conditions of required permits from the Watershed District, MPCA, and
City.
j. to show the names of streets as approved on the Final Plat and current names of
38th/39th Street, which may be changed later by ordinance.
61
2. The Park Commons East Phase 1 Final PUD approval includes code deviations to allow
daycare as a retail/service use, right-of-way and street designs, open space, FAR/GFAR,
building setbacks, bufferyards, and off-street parking as shown on the official exhibits
based upon a finding of general consistency with the approved Redevelopment Plan and
subject to any other conditions of final approval.
3. Outdoor seating is permitted in association with restaurants and food service uses subject
to any conditions of Final PUD approval for that phase, easement provisions, health
codes, and approval of specific outdoor seating plans by the Zoning Administrator.
4. All parking shall be open to the general public at all times except as follows: on-street
parking may be restricted by the City, below-ground parking may be restricted to
building residents, and a plan for valet parking may be approved by the City.
5. If parking is deemed inadequate by the City based upon evidence of parking in fire lanes,
drive aisles or other inappropriate areas, the developer shall be required to rectify the
situation in accordance with the provisions of the planning contract.
6. Proposed “Grand Place” north of 38th/39th may be closed for events as approved by the
City.
7. The developer is required to comply with all provisions of the planning contract,
development agreement with the EDA, Metropolitan Council LCDA grant agreement(s),
MPCA and Watershed District approvals.
8. Specific responsibility for financing and construction of the following required Phase 1
improvements shall be addressed by the Planning Contract:
j. construction of all streets, on-street parking, and utilities, within the entire PUD
area.
k. completion of streetscape improvements, including bicycle and transit amenities,
adjacent to all Phase 1 properties and Wolfe Park.
l. construction of temporary bituminous sidewalks in accordance with a plan
approved by the Zoning Administrator.
m. regrading of the southern portion of Wolfe Park, relocation/reconstruction of the
existing trail, and construction of the park edge road, parking, approved hard
surface sidewalk between parking and trail, plantings and streetscape subject to
approved final plans.
n. construction of the entire town green from Excelsior Boulevard to Wolfe Park in
accordance with approved final town green plans with temporary sidewalks north
of 38th/39th until permanent sidewalks/streetscape are completed during
construction of each future phase.
o. construction of the Phase 1 public parking ramps in accordance with approved
final plans.
p. construction of the police substation and public restrooms in accordance with
approved final plans.
q. construction of traffic improvements and installation of traffic control and
directional signage in accordance with approved final plans.
62
r. construction of 18 project-based two-bedroom Section 8 units in accordance with
public housing agreements.
9. Prior to any site work other than demolition for Park Commons East Phase One:
g. the Final Plat and PUD for Phase 1 shall be approved and the Final Plat shall be
signed by the City.
h. final construction documents for public infrastructure (street, underground
utilities; not streetscape) improvements shall be approved by the Public Works
Director.
i. required erosion control permits, utility permits, and other required permits shall
be obtained from the City, Hennepin County, Watershed District and any other
required agencies.
j. the MPCA shall be informed of the plans to regrade the southern portion of Wolfe
Park and approval shall be received prior to regrading the park, if needed.
k. a final tree preservation plan shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator and
any necessary construction fencing shall be in place.
l. plans for maintaining access to existing private condominium parking during
construction shall be approved by Public Works and the affected property owners,
if temporary construction easements are necessary.
10. Prior to issuance of any building permits, which may impose additional conditions:
g. Evidence of recording the final plat, easements, and planning contract shall be
submitted to the City.
h. the Indirect Source Permit shall be approved by the MPCA, if necessary.
i. A lighting and photometric plan shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
j. An irrigation plan shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
k. Exterior building material/colors shall be approved by the Zoning Administrator.
l. Final plans for a police substation and adjacent public restrooms shall be
approved by the Police Chief and Community Development Director.
11. Prior to installation of any private signage, sign permits shall be approved by the Zoning
Administrator.
12. Future phases of the Final Plat and PUD are approved in general concept only and subject
to the following conditions of approval:
h. All future phases are required to apply for subsequent Preliminary and Final Plat
and PUD approval for those phases; such Preliminary and Final approval may be
considered concurrently subject to Code and any pertinent provisions of the
development agreements.
i. Curb cuts, permanent sidewalks and streetscape adjacent to future phases shall be
completed during construction of each future phase.
j. A minimum of 35 stacked townhomes for owner-occupants shall be included in
Future Phase E and/or Future Phase NE; additional condominiums and changes to
proposed building height may be approved for Future Phase NE based upon
recommendations of a market study.
k. The City may consider proposals for permanent use of Future Phase W, subject to
the provisions in the existing development contract between TOLD, EDA and
City, either on its own or combined with potential redevelopment of the property
to the west. However, the City may retain the Future Phase W property
63
indefinitely and use it for such uses as the City may deem appropriate, including
potential transit and parking uses.
l. Variances to the 80 feet minimum lot width of the “R-C” District may be
approved subject to Preliminary and Final Plat and PUD approvals.
m. Allowable Code deviations are subject to the approved Redevelopment Plan and
future Preliminary and Final PUD approvals.
n. Approval for construction of future phases is contingent upon provision of
adequate parking, which may include interim parking as approved by the City,
and must include 75 weekday and 200 evening/weekend parking spaces, in excess
of other needs of the development, for town green and Wolfe Park uses.
13. Prior to execution of the Final Plat for each subsequent phase:
d. preliminary and final plat/PUD approval shall be obtained for that phase.
e. the existing development agreement shall be amended as necessary and a new
planning contract shall be executed between the developer and City/EDA.
f. public sidewalk easements shall be approved by the City Attorney for those areas
of private development lots between the public street and building setback.
Pursuant to Section 14:6-7.5(F) of the Zoning Ordinance, the City will require execution of a
development agreement as a condition of approval of the Final P.U.D. The development
agreement shall address those issues which the City Council deems appropriate and necessary.
The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the
Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
64
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
September 4, 2001
ITEMS TO BE ACTED UPON BY CONSENT
Consent items are those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need
no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a
Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section
of the regular agenda for discussion.
1. Motion to adopt resolution approving 2002-2006 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) and amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the CIP.
2. Motion to approve the ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Municipal Code
concerning employees of the City of St. Louis Park by deleting Chapter 3:
Personnel., approve the ordinance summary and authorize summary publication.
3. Motion to approve the six resolutions related to the Park Commons title clean up..
4. Motion to approve second reading of rezoning ordinance - Evan Johnson
(Thermetic Products Inc.) for a rezoning from R4 to C2 for the property located at
1409 and 1413 Colorado Avenue South; approve summary ordinance and
authorize publication. Case No. 01-38-Z
5. Resolutions to amend and correct resolution 00-69 granting approval of final PUD
and plat for Mill City Addition. Motion to adopt Resolution approving final PUD
for Mill City Addition. Motion to adopt Resolution approving final plat for Mill
City Addition.
6. Motion to adopt resolutions approving final payments listed below:
Allied Blacktop Company $ 75,390.93
Contract No. 43-01
Contract sealcoating
Thomas & Sons $ 26,759.59
Contract No. 71-00
Storm sewer ponds and lift stations
7. Motion to accept the following reports for filing:
a. Telecommunications Advisory Commission Minutes of may 10, 2001
b. Vendor Claims
65
CONSENT ITEM # 1
St. Louis Park City Council
Meeting of September 4, 2001
1. Motion to adopt resolution approving 2002-2006 Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) and amending the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the CIP.
BACKGROUND:
The purpose of this memo is to request approval of the City’s improvement and maintenance
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects for the years 2002 through 2006 and incorporation
of the CIP into the City’s Comprehensive Plan. Council initially discussed this item at its July 23
study session. This effort builds upon last year’s program in which the 2000-2001 CIP was
compiled, reviewed at a study session, then approved by Council in December 2000.
On July 23, Council was generally supportive of draft CIP, and also requested that priorities be
assigned to projects that do not have one. Staff also noted that the CIP is a living document, and
additional projects would likely result upon completion of the parks master plan and
infrastructure management project. It was also noted that the technology section would be
expanded to include radio and telephone systems. Such additions would be on going, and begin
showing up in the 2003-2007 CIP.
It has been the goal of staff to present a five-year CIP Clearly, there is much better information
about what projects to anticipate in the earlier years of a five-year program than the later years.
As a result, the attached CIP shows more projects identified in 2002 and 2003 than in later years.
Additional projects are identified each year, and presented to Council during its annual review of
the CIP. As important as the projects and related costs is the need to identify anticipated related
sources of funding. In contemplation of many of these projects, the 2002 annual operating budget
was developed to include related operating costs.
As indicated above, Council requested that priorities be assigned to more projects included in the
CIP. Staff has completed this process and priorities are now included for all projects in this
version of the CIP. There are four Public Works projects that have a priority of “0” in each year
of the program. This priority reflects the fact that these four projects are significant on-going
maintenance or fleet replacement projects (versus typical new improvements). It should be noted
that project priorities could change from year to year based on such factors as deterioration or
accelerated schedules.
In addition, the Planning Commission considered the proposed CIP at its August 15 meeting.
Staff prepared a comparison of capital improvement projects with major Comprehensive Plan
initiatives. The Commission found no conflicts between the two documents. The Commission
also recognizes that the CIP will be updated each year with the attempt to reflect additional
Comprehensive Plan initiatives, which span out to the year 2020. At that meeting, the
Commission voted unanimously to recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution
amending the Comprehensive Plan 2000 – 2020 to incorporate the 2002 – 2006 CIP. Finally,
66
Council reviewed the proposed CIP again at its August 27 study session and suggested no
additional modifications at that time.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ELEMENTS:
Presented below are some key elements of the CIP process and document. Based on Council
feedback last year, modifications were made to ensure that many “visible” projects, some of
which may be more maintenance in nature, are included in the CIP
Goals
The CIP should:
• Improve the management of City assets and infrastructure
• Make planned improvements more visible
• Improve coordination among City departments and other agencies
• Enhance the commitment to complete planned projects
• Make resource requirements more predictable
• Better align City projects with goals of neighborhoods
• Implement the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan
Scope
Broad categories and sources of potential CIP projects include:
• Comprehensive Plan (New Projects)
• Rehabilitation/Reconditioning Projects
• Redevelopment Projects (often EDA)
• Reconstruction Projects
• Expansion Projects
• Vision St. Louis Park Linked Projects
• Shared School District Related Projects
• Technology / Fleet Replacements and Additions
Related Considerations
• Input from Council, Staff, Planning Commission
• Assign Project to Appropriate Year
• Timely Council Review / Approval
• Financing Considerations (inflationary increases to specific projects absorbed by
general estimates)
• Adoption of 5-Year CIP with Annual Council Review / Updates
67
CIP PROJECTS DOCUMENT:
Given these goals, scope, and related considerations, staff embarked on describing proposed
projects for 2002 through 2006. Staff from Public Works, Parks and Rec, Community
Development, and Information Technologies have devoted significant time to the CIP content
and presentation format. A copy of the proposed CIP, previously reviewed by Council, is
available in the City Clerk’s office. It includes:
Project Summaries – Reports of projects by year, department total, and department detail.
Funding Summaries – Reports of project revenue summaries and projects by funding source.
Operations Summaries – Summary and detail reports of the impact of projects on various
operating budgets.
Project Detail Sheets – Information Technologies projects are followed by Parks and Rec
projects, then Public Works projects. Public EDA-related components of projects typically cross
into one or both of Public Works and Parks and Rec. Note that detail sheets also appear for
projects that have only operational costs in 2002-2006, though the actual project construction has
been completed.
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that Council adopt the attached resolution approving the 2002-2006 Capital
Improvement Program and amending the City’s Comprehensive Plan 2000-2020 to incorporate
the CIP.
Attachments: Resolution
Resolution Summary
Prepared by: Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator
Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
68
RESOLUTION NO. 01-092
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN 2000 TO THE YEAR 2020 FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES 462.351 TO 462.364
INCORPORATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) 2002 - 2006
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan 2000-2020 was adopted by the City Council on
May 17, 1999 (effective September 1, 1999) and provides the following:
1. An official statement serving as the basic guide in making land use, transportation and
community facilities and service decisions affecting the City.
2. A framework for policies and actions leading to the improvement of the physical,
financial, and social environment of the City, thereby providing a good place to live and work
and a setting conducive for new development.
3. A promotion of the public interest in establishing a more functional, healthful,
interesting, and efficient community by serving the interests of the community at large rather
than the interests of individual or special groups within the community if their interests are at
variance with the public interest.
4. An effective framework for direction and coordination of activities affecting the
development and preservation of the community.
5. Treatment of the entire community as one ecosystem and to inject long range
considerations into determinations affecting short-range action, and
WHEREAS, the use of such Comprehensive Plan will insure a safer, more pleasant, and
more economical environment for residential, commercial, industrial, and public activities and
will promote the public health, safety, and general welfare, and
WHEREAS, said Plan will prepare the community for anticipated desirable change,
thereby bringing about significant savings in both private and public expenditures, and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan has taken due cognizance of the planning activities
of adjacent units of government, and
WHEREAS, the Comprehensive Plan is to be periodically reviewed by the Planning
Commission of the City of St. Louis Park and amendments made, if justified according to
procedures, rules, and laws, and provided such amendments would provide a positive result and
are consistent with other provisions in the Comprehensive Plan, and
69
WHEREAS, fiscal devises such as the City’s 5-year capital improvement program for
transportation, utilities, and parks is used as a tool to implement the goals and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City’s capital improvement program is updated annually to incorporate
new projects and new sources of funding, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Capital Improvement Program 2002
– 2006 and found it to be consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan 2000
– 2020, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of St. Louis Park recommended
adoption of an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan 2000-2020 to incorporate the Capital
Improvement Program 2002 – 2006 on August 15, 2001, based on statutes, the Metropolitan
Regional Blueprint, extensive research and analyses involving the interests of citizens and public
agencies;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of St. Louis Park that the
Capital Improvement Program 2002 – 2006 is hereby approved and the Comprehensive Plan, as
previously adopted by the Planning Commission and City Council, is hereby amended as
follows:
Incorporation of Capital Improvement Program 2002 - 2006
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
Contingent upon approval of the Metropolitan
Council
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
01-40-CP/N:res
70
SUMMARY
RESOLUTION NO. 01-092
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN 2000 TO THE YEAR 2020 FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
UNDER MINNESOTA STATUTES 462.351 TO 462.364
INCORPORATING CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) 2002 - 2006
This resolution states that the City of St. Louis Park’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) 2002
– 2006 shall be incorporated into the Comprehensive Plan 2000 to the year 2020
This resolution shall take effect upon approval of the amendment by the Metropolitan Council
Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this resolution is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 12, 2001
01-40-CP-sum:N\res
71
CONSENT ITEM # 2
St. Louis Park City Council
Meeting of September 4, 2001
2. Motion to approve the ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Municipal Code
concerning employees of the City of St. Louis Park by deleting Chapter 3:
Personnel., approve the ordinance summary and authorize summary publication.
Background
As part of the recodification process, staff and the city attorney have recommended that council
take action to delete Chapter 3: Personnel from the municipal code and adopt by resolution
certain provisions which were previously contained in ordinance.
The first reading of the Ordinance deleting chapter 3 and the corresponding resolution replacing
personnel policies were approved by Council on August 20, 2001.
Recommendation
Staff recommends approval of the ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Municipal Code
concerning employees of the City of St. Louis Park by deleting Chapter 3: Personnel.
Attachments: Ordinance
Summary
Prepared By: Nancy Gohman, Human Resources Manager
Approved By: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
72
ORDINANCE NO. 2204-01
An Ordinance Amending the St. Louis Park Municipal Code
Concerning Employees of the City of St. Louis Park
By Deleting Chapter 3: Personnel
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. Chapter 3, Sections 3-100 through 3-801 are hereby deleted in their
entirety.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect fifteen days following
publication.
SECTION 3. Exception to Effective Date. The deletion of Sections 3-609 Funeral
Leave, 3-610 Flex Leave for Supervisory Employees and 3-611 Flex Leave for Non-Supervisory
Employees shall be effective on September 30, 2001.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
73
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO._____________
AN ORDINANCE DELETING CHAPTER 3
OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING PERSONNEL
This ordinance deletes Chapter 3: Personnel from the St. Louis Park Municipal Code. Provisions
regarding city employees previously contained in ordinance will be adopted by resolution of the
City Council.
This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after publication with the exception of Sections 3-
609 through 3-611which shall be deleted effective September 30, 2001.
Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 5, 2001
74
CONSENT ITEM # 3
St. Louis Park City Council
Meeting of September 4, 2001
3. Motion to approve the six resolutions below that are related to the Park
Commons title clean up.
This report considers the approval of six resolutions related to clearing up title
issues for property in the Park Commons Redevelopment Area. Two of the
resolutions rescind previous Conditional Use Permits, two terminate restrictive
covenants, one clears up an overlapping plat issue, and one terminates a private
driveway on a public right-of-way.
• A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 90-177 And Terminating A Special
(Conditional Use) Permit In Minnikada Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County.
• A Resolution Rescinding Resolution No. 87-70 And Terminating A Special
(Conditional Use) Permit In Minnikada Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County.
• A Resolution Terminating A Declaration Of Restrictive Covenants And
Conditions In Minnikada Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County.
• A Resolution Releasing A Declaration Of Covenants, Conditions, And
Restrictions In Minnikada Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County.
• A Resolution Authorizing Replatting Of City Property Located Between The
Plat Of “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County” And Registered
Land Survey No. 2, And The Plat Of Westmoreland Park.
• A Resolution Terminating An Agreement For Private Driveway On Public
Right-Of-Way In Minnikada Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County.
Background:
As part of the title review of the properties in Park Commons East, a number of issues have been
discovered which need to be corrected in order for the title company to issue title insurance to
TOLD Development Company.
The issues can be resolved by the City Council by approving the six attached resolutions. Two of
the resolutions relate to Conditional Use Permits that were associated with the Jennings and Gold
properties. Two of the resolutions are related to Restrictive Covenants that were associated with
the Jennings and Gold properties. One of the resolutions is associated with clearing up an
overlapping plat issue located along the north edge of the Park Commons East plat and one of
the resolutions terminates an agreement for a private driveway on a public right-of-way related to
the Rossi property.
Prepared by: Tom Kleve, Economic Development Coordinator
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
75
RESOLUTION NO. 01-093
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 90-177
AND TERMINATING A SPECIAL (CONDITIONAL USE) PERMIT
IN “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”
WHEREAS, on December 3, 1990, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 90-177
granting a special (conditional use) permit to allow a Class I Restaurant at 4700 Excelsior
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, a certified copy of Resolution No. 90-177 was filed December 31, 1990, in
the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2146318 and
memorialized on Certificate of Title No. 632648 and Certificate of Title No. 1023799,
encumbering real property legally described on the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as
the “Subject Property”); and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority acquired title to the
Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is no longer improved with a Class I Restaurant and
will soon be replatted as part of PARK COMMONS EAST; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority requests that the City
Council rescind Resolution No. 90-177 and terminate the special (conditional use) permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 90-177 and terminates the
special (conditional use) permit, a certified copy of which was filed December 31, 1990, in the
Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2146318.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
76
RESOLUTION NO. 01-094
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 87-70
AND TERMINATING A SPECIAL (CONDITIONAL USE) PERMIT
IN “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”
WHEREAS, on May 16, 1983, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 7390 granting a
special permit for the purposes of permitting building and site improvements within a Planned
Unit Development at 4606-4630 Excelsior Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, a certified copy of Resolution No. 7390 was filed in the Office of the
Hennepin County Recorder as Document No. 4807436 and was filed July 25, 1983, in the Office
of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 1525458 and memorialized on
Certificate of Title No. 1063574, encumbering real property legally described on the attached
Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”); and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87-70 rescinding
Resolution No. 7390 and granting a special (conditional use) permit to allow an off-sale liquor
store at 4600 Excelsior Boulevard and two Class I restaurants at 4606-4630 Excelsior Boulevard;
and
WHEREAS, a certified copy of Resolution No. 87-70 was filed September 24, 1987, in
the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 1874637 and
memorialized on Certificate of Title No. 1063574, encumbering real property legally described
on the attached Exhibit A (hereinafter referred to as the “Subject Property”); and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority acquired title to the
Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is no longer improved with an off-sale liquor store and
two Class I restaurants and will soon be replatted as part of PARK COMMONS EAST; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority requests that the City
Council rescind Resolution No. 87-70 and terminate the special (conditional use) permit.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby rescinds Resolution No. 87-70 and terminates the special
(conditional use) permit, a certified copy of which was filed September 24, 1987, in the Office of
the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 1874637.
(Insert Signature Block Here)
77
RESOLUTION NO. 01-095
A RESOLUTION TERMINATING A DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE
COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS IN
“Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”
WHEREAS, on May 31, 1990, the City of St. Louis Park and Stephen I. Gold entered
into a Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Conditions, and this document was filed June 15,
1990, in the Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2103636 and
memorialized on Certificate of Title No. 1023799, encumbering real property legally described
as follows (the “Subject Property”):
Lots 3, 4, 5 and 6, Block 4, “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority acquired title to the
Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property will soon be replatted as part of PARK COMMONS
EAST; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority requests that the City
Council terminate the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Conditions.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby terminates the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and
Conditions, dated May 31, 1990, and filed June 15, 1990, in the Office of the Hennepin County
Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2103636.
2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute all
documents necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to terminate the Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants and Conditions, dated May 31, 1990, and filed June 15, 1990, in the
Office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles, as Document No. 2103636.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
____________________________ _________________________________
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
City Clerk
78
RESOLUTION NO. 01-096
A RESOLUTION RELEASING A DECLARATION
OF COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS
IN “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”
WHEREAS, on January 19, 1983, Michael J. Jennings executed a Declaration of
Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions, and this document was filed February 10, 1983, in the
Office of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 4771659 and encumbered real
property legally described as follows (the “Subject Property”):
Lots 8, 9, 10 and the Easterly 20 feet of Lot 11, Block 3, “Minikahda Vista 2nd
Addition, Hennepin County”
Lots 12 through 20, inclusive, and the Westerly 30 feet of Lot 11, Block 3,
“Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”
WHEREAS, the covenants, conditions and restrictions identified in the Declaration inure
to the benefit of the City of St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority acquired title to the
Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property will soon be replatted as part of PARK COMMONS
EAST; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority requests that the City
Council release the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby releases the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, and
Restrictions, dated January 19, 1983, and filed February 10, 1983, in the Office of the Hennepin
County Recorder, as Document No. 4771659.
2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute all
documents necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to release the Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions, and Restrictions, dated January 19, 1983, and filed February 10, 1983, in the Office
of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 4771659.
(Insert Signature Block Here)
79
RESOLUTION NO. 01-097
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING REPLATTING OF CITY PROPERTY LOCATED
BETWEEN THE PLAT OF "MINIKAHDA VISTA 2ND ADDITION, HENNEPIN
COUNTY" AND REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 2, AND THE PLAT OF
WESTMORELAND PARK
WHEREAS, the survey of the land in the proposed plat of PARK COMMONS EAST
shows that the land in the plat of “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County” and the
land in Registered Land Survey No. 2 appears to overlap the land in the plat of Westmoreland
Park; and
WHEREAS, the title examination relating to the land being platted as PARK
COMMONS EAST revealed that the City appears to have an ownership interest in the overlap
area; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to clear up all title issues relating to the land being platted as
PARK COMMONS EAST; and
WHEREAS, the City does not claim an ownership interest in or intend to own any
property within the plat of PARK COMMONS EAST, save and except for the property that will
be dedicated to the public for public use, including the streets, avenues, boulevards, drives,
parkways, lanes, and drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat; and
WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the platting of PARK COMMONS EAST and the future
sale and development thereof, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority requests that
the City join in the plat of PARK COMMONS EAST and, after the platting thereof, quit claim
any interest the City may have in the land in PARK COMMONS EAST save and except for the
property that will be dedicated to the public for public use, including the streets, avenues,
boulevards, drives, parkways, lanes, and drainage and utility easements as shown on the plat.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute all
documents necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to join in the final plat of PARK
COMMONS EAST with respect to property that the City appears to own within the plat of
PARK COMMONS EAST.
2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Clerk to execute all
documents necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to quit claim to the St. Louis Park
Economic Development Authority any interest the City may have in any property within the plat
of PARK COMMONS EAST, save and except for the property to be dedicated to the public for
public use, including the streets, avenues, boulevards, drives, parkways, lanes, and drainage and
utility easements as shown on the plat.
80
RESOLUTION NO. 01-098
A RESOLUTION TERMINATING AN AGREEMENT
FOR PRIVATE DRIVEWAY ON PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY IN
“Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County”
WHEREAS, on March 20, 1989 the City of St. Louis Park and the Estate of Emily A.
Zrust, a single person, by its Personal Representative Alfred J. Rossi, entered into an Agreement
for Private Driveway on Public Right-of-Way, and this document was filed June 14, 1989, in the
Office of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 5544264, encumbering real property
legally described as Lot 1, Block 5, “Minikahda Vista 2nd Addition, Hennepin County” (the
“Subject Property”):
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority acquired title to the
Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property will soon be replatted as part of PARK COMMONS
EAST; and
WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority requests that the City
Council terminate the Agreement for Private Driveway on Public Right-of-Way.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL RESOLVES AS
FOLLOWS:
1. The City Council hereby terminates the Agreement for Private Driveway on
Public Right-of-Way, dated March 20, 1989, and filed June 14, 1989, in the Office of the
Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 5544264.
2. The City Council hereby authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute all
documents necessary in the opinion of the City Attorney to terminate the Agreement for Private
Driveway on Public Right-of-Way, dated March 20, 1989, and filed June 14, 1989, in the Office
of the Hennepin County Recorder, as Document No. 5544264.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
____________________________ _________________________________
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
_______________________________
City Clerk
81
CONSENT ITEM # 4
St. Louis Park City Council
Meeting of September 4, 2001
4. Motion to approve second reading of rezoning ordinance - Evan Johnson
(Thermetic Products Inc.) for a rezoning from R4 to C2 for the property
located at 1409 and 1413 Colorado Avenue South; approve summary
ordinance and authorize publication. Case No. 01-38-Z
Background:
On January 17, 1995, the City Council approved a Comprehensive Plan amendment changing the
designation of the two adjacent properties to the north, 1401 and 1405 Colorado, from High
Density Residential to Commercial. The Planning Commission reviewed that case on December
7, 1994, and recommended approval based on a finding that adverse impacts would be
minimized due to the size of the parcels.
On March 6, 1995, the City Council approved a rezoning of the two adjacent properties to the
north, 1401 and 1405 Colorado, from R4-Multiple Family Residential to C2-General
Commercial. The Planning Commission reviewed that case on February 1, 1995, and
recommended approval based on the earlier Comprehensive Plan amendment.
In 1998, Evan Johnson combined the lots at 1401 and 1405 Colorado and added onto the north
side of the existing building to accommodate his business expansion. In April of 2001, the
single-family dwelling units located on the subject properties, 1409 and 1413 Colorado, were
demolished.
Evan Johnson is requesting the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning of 1409 and 1413
Colorado to accommodate a second building expansion.
On August 3, 2001, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the
Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning requests. No one was present from the public.
The Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the rezoning and amendment to
the Comprehensive Plan.
On August 20, 2001, the City Council voted 7-0 to approve the Comprehensive Plan amendment
and the first reading of the rezoning of the subject property from R4 – Multi-Family Residential
to C2 – General Commercial.
Existing Conditions
Both of the subject properties, 1409 and 1413 Colorado, are vacant and have lot dimensions of
50 feet in width by 126 feet in length. As explained above, the adjacent properties to the north
82
are zoned C2 as well as the Westside Office Park property to the east. The abutting property to
the south and the property across the street to the west is zoned R4-Multiple Family Residential.
Issues:
• What change or changing condition makes the Comprehensive Plan amendment and
rezoning necessary?
• What is the expected effect of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning?
• What other uses would be permitted if the applicant sold the property?
• Are the Zoning Ordinance requirements being satisfied?
• How does the development impact the proximate residential properties?
Issues Analysis:
What change or changing condition makes the Comprehensive Plan amendment and
rezoning necessary?
The Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning is desirable because of the redesignation and
rezoning of the adjacent parcels to the north from High Density Residential to Commercial. This
change in land use limits the redevelopment potential of the remaining two lots on this block; the
lots are undersized at 50 feet in width. A Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning will
enable a more unified development than if the properties on this block had a split zoning.
What is the expected effect of the Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning?
The Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezoning to Commercial are necessary steps to enable
the applicant to expand his Thermetic Products business. Assuming the future building
expansion will cross existing platted property lines, the applicant will also need to replat the
property in accordance with the new Subdivision Ordinance. The current building is 3,800
square feet in size. A building expansion would enable the applicant to increase the number of
employees from 20 to 35.
What other uses would be permitted if the applicant sold the property?
The following uses are permitted by right in the Commercial District: park and open space,
police and fire stations, post offices, business and trade schools, medical and dental offices,
funeral homes, libraries, museums, banks, offices, retail shops, service facilities, studios, show
rooms, parking lots, transit stations, and time transfer stations.
The following uses are permitted with conditions but do not need a public hearing: adult day
care; group day care or nursery schools; dry cleaning; park/recreation; public service structures;
utility substations; animal handling; appliance, small engine, and bicycle repair; clubs without
liquor license; convention halls; food service; hotel/motel; in-vehicle sales or service; medical,
optical and dental laboratories; outdoor sales (display); printing process facilities; shopping
center; communication towers; parking lots and parking ramps as an exclusive principal land
83
use; limited and high impact sexually-oriented businesses (the site does not meet the minimum
setback from residential for these uses), and education.
The following uses would need City Council approval through a public hearing process in the
Commercial zoning district: motor fuel stations, motor vehicle sales and repair, restaurants with
liquor licenses, multiple family housing, and elderly housing.
Are the Zoning Ordinance requirements being satisfied?
Thermetic Products makes small electronic equipment for computers. Fifty percent of the
existing building is used for office space for the business while 30% of the building is used for
small assembly and 10% used for warehouse. Office is a permitted principal use in the C2 zoning
district while incidental processing and warehousing are permitted accessory uses if they do not
exceed 40% of the building’s floor area. The applicant has noted that the business expansion
would consist of the same ratios of the existing operations.
How does the development impact the proximate residential properties?
The existing site design poses minimal impacts to the apartments to the west and south of the
subject property. The site design of Thermetic Products is optimal with regard to the residential
apartment across Colorado Avenue. The parking lot is located behind the building providing a
more aesthetic view from the apartment and public roadway. Moreover, the combination of the
existing vegetation on the south side of the subject property and the access drive to the
apartments to the south provide an effective buffer for the apartments south of the property.
Any future expansion of the building would have to meet setback and bufferyard requirements
from the residential property to the south.
Recommendation:
Motion to approve Second Reading of a Zoning Ordinance amendment rezoning the properties
located at 1409 and 1413 Colorado Avenue South from R4 – Multi-Family Residential to C2 –
General Commercial subject to approval of the Comprehensive Plan amendment by the
Metropolitan Council. The ordinance would not become effective until Metropolitan Council
approval is obtained.
Attachments
• Location Map
• Zoning Map
• Rezoning Ordinance
• Summary Ordinance
Prepared by: Patrick Smith, Planner
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
84
ORDINANCE NO. 2206-01
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS
1409 and 1413 COLORADO AVENUE SOUTH
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK DOES ORDAIN:
Section 1. The St. Louis Park Zoning Ordinance adopted December 28, 1959,
Ordinance No. 730; amended December 31, 1992, Ordinance No. 1902-93, as heretofore
amended, is hereby further amended by changing the zoning district boundaries by reclassifying
the following described lands from their existing land use district classification to the new land
use district classification as indicated for the tract as hereinafter set forth, to wit:
Lots 7 and 8, Block 4, John A. Johnsons Addition
from R4 Multi-Family Residential to C-2 General Commercial.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council approval of
associated Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
Reviewed for Administration
City Manager Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
City Clerk City Attorney
01-38-Z:n/res-ord
85
SUMMARY
ORDINANCE NO. 2206-01
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE
CHANGING BOUNDARIES OF ZONING DISTRICTS
1409 and 1413 COLORADO AVENUE SOUTH
This ordinance states that the zoning at 1409 and 1413 Colorado Avenue South shall be changed
from R-4 Multi-Family Residential to C-2 General Commercial.
This ordinance shall take effect upon approval by the Metropolitan Council of a related
Comprehensive Plan amendment.
Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
Jeffrey W. Jacobs /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 12, 2001
01-38-Z-sum:n
86
CONSENT ITEM # 5
St. Louis Park City Council
Meeting of September 4, 2001
5. Resolutions to amend and correct resolution 00-69 granting approval of final
PUD and plat for Mill City Addition. Motion to adopt Resolution approving
final PUD for Mill City Addition. Motion to adopt Resolution approving final
plat for Mill City Addition.
Background:
On May 20, 2000, the City Council approved Resolution 00-69 granting a minor amendment to
the final PUD and plat approval for Mill City Addition. Procedurally, the City Attorney’s office
files planning resolutions with Hennepin County following City Council adoption.
Hennepin County follows certain procedures for accepting resolutions for filing. For instance,
they will not accept resolutions where the legal description has been changed or is incorrect and
they will not accept a resolution approving a plat after the plat itself has been filed. The County
rejected Resolution 00-69 for both of these reasons.
The attached resolutions separate the Mill City PUD approval from the plat approval. It also
changes the property description on the PUD resolution to reflect the new description created by
the plat. This will enable the City Attorney’s office to file the PUD. The new resolution
approving that plat will not be filed since the plat has already been filed.
In the future, whenever a plat is involved with a PUD, these will be brought to the Council on
separate resolutions.
Attachments: Resolution approving final PUD for Mill City Addition
Resolution approving final plat for Mill City Addition.
Prepared by: Judie Erickson, Planning Coordinator
Approved by: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
87
RESOLUTION NO. 01-099
Amends Resolution No. 00-069
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 00-069 ADOPTED ON MAY 20, 2000
APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION
14:6-7 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING AND
FOR PROPERTY ZONED R-C HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT
7301 WALKER STREET
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Preliminary PUD for Mill City Addition on
February 7, 2000, Resolution No. 00-010, and
WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for
Mill City Addition was received on February 22, 2000 from the applicant, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD for Mill City Addition at
the meeting of March 1, 2000, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final PUD for Mill
City Addition on a 6-1 vote with six members present voting in the affirmative, and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Final PUD for Mill City Addition on April 3,
2000, Resolution 00-036; and
WHEREAS, an application for a minor amendment to the approved Final PUD to revise
approved building elevations was received on May 10, 2000 from the applicant,
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission
minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments
in the record of decision.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. MSP Real Estate has made application to the City Council for a Planned Unit Development
under Section 14:6-7 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the R-C High Density
Residential district located at 7301 Walker Street for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
Lot 1, Block 1, Mill City Addition
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 99-35-PUD) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety
and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
88
the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the
Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it
cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property
values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested
modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7.2(E).
4. The contents of Planning Case Files 99-35-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Final Planned Unit Development for Mill City Addition at the location described are
approved based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions:
A. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with Official Exhibits A
through G, Exhibit G building elevations to be revised to show brick to the bottom of the
third row of windows rather than cement siding on either side of the building entrances on
Walker Street and as amended on May 15, 2000 by Condition I.
B. PUD approval and development is contingent upon sale of certain City land to developer
and meeting all conditions of final approval.
C. Prior to any site work, the developer shall meet the following requirements:
1. A drainage permit shall be obtained from MNDOT.
2. A copy of the Watershed District permit shall be forwarded to the City.
3. Any other necessary permits from other agencies shall be obtained.
4. Sign assent form and official exhibits.
5. Meet all conditions for the City signing the final plat.
D. Prior to issuance of any building permits, which may impose additional requirements, the
developer shall comply with the following:
1. Meet any Fire Department emergency access requirements for during construction.
2. The subdivider shall furnish the City with evidence of recording of the final plat and trail
easement.
3. Submit and have approved lighting plans, signage plans, and building materials samples.
E. A PUD ordinance modification to allow 316 parking stalls rather than the required 346 stalls
is approved as part of the final PUD.
F. A six foot concrete sidewalk along the south side of Walker Street is to be installed and
maintained by the developer per the approved site plan, unless the City chooses to maintain
the sidewalk. A ten-foot bituminous trail is to be installed on Louisiana Avenue by the
developer and maintained by the City per the approved preliminary plat.
G. The developer shall provide the 1,798 inches of replacement trees on site or a combination
of on-site trees and cash in lieu of trees. The Community Development Director and Parks
and Recreation Director shall approve the cash equivalent amount.
89
H. The 20 required guest parking spaces shall be reserved via signage or other means approved
by the Zoning Administrator. If evidence, such as parking on public streets, drive aisles or
fire lanes, indicates that additional guest spaces are needed, the Zoning Administrator may
require conversion of proof of parking and/or designation of additional on-site guest
parking.
I. The Final PUD shall be amended on May 15, 2000 to incorporate all of the preceding
conditions and add the following conditions:
1. Official Exhibit G, building elevations, shall be further modified to replace stucco with
cement siding in certain areas as approved by the City Council.
Pursuant to Section 14:6-7.5(F) of the Zoning Ordinance, the City will require execution of a
development agreement as a condition of approval of the Final P.U.D. The development
agreement shall address those issues which the City Council deems appropriate and necessary.
Reviewed for Administration:
Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
90
RESOLUTION NO. 01-100
Amends Resolution No. 00-069
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION 00-069 ADOPTED ON MAY 20, 2000
APPROVING A FINAL PLAT – MILL CITY ADDITION LOCATED AT
7301 WALKER STREET
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Preliminary Plat for Mill City Addition on
February 7, 2000, Resolution No. 00-010, and
WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Final Plat for Mill City Addition was
received on February 22, 2000 from the applicant, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final Plat for Mill City Addition at
the meeting of March 1, 2000, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final plat for Mill
City Addition on a 6-1 vote with six members present voting in the affirmative, and
WHEREAS, the City Council approved the Final Plat for Mill City Addition on April 3,
2000, Resolution 00-036.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
MSP Real Estate, owners and subdividers of the land proposed to be platted as Mill City
Addition has submitted an application for approval of final plat of said subdivision in the manner
required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have
been duly had thereunder;
for the legal description as follows, to-wit:
see Attached Legal Description
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning
Commission (Case No. 99-37-S) and the effect of the proposed plat on the health, safety and
welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the
effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive
Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council has determined that the proposed subdivision will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic
improvements will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate
91
surrounding property values. The Council has also determined that the proposed subdivision is
in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. The contents of Planning Case File 99-37-S is hereby entered into and made part of the public
hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Final Plat for Mill City Addition at the location described is approved based on the findings
set forth above and subject to the following conditions:
A. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance the Final PUD (Case 99-
35-PUD and subsequent amendments).
B. Final plat approval and development is contingent upon sale of certain City land to
developer and meeting all conditions of final approval.
C. Before a final plat is signed by the City, the developer shall comply with the following
requirements:
1. Submit to the City a copy of owner’s policy of title insurance which insures the City’s
interest in the plat, in an amount to be determined by the City.
2. A development agreement shall be executed between the developer and the City/EDA
which covers at a minimum, allowable plan modifications, sidewalk construction and
maintenance, tree replacement, installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of
Louisiana and Walker Street and creation of a left turn lane on Louisiana Avenue, and
repair and cleaning of public streets. The development agreement shall also cite the
approved parking modification.
3. Submit financial security in the form of cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of
125% of the costs of tree replacement, sidewalk installation, and repair/cleaning of public
streets.
4. Submit a copy of unrecorded trail easement document to City for review.
5. Reimbursement of City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents.
D. Within 60 days of final plat approval by the City Council, the subdivider shall record the
final plat with the County Recorder. The subdivider shall, immediately upon recording,
furnish the City Clerk with a print and reproducible tracing of the final plat showing
evidence of the recording. The subdivider shall also provide a copy of the final plat on disc
in an electronic data format.
E. Prior to or simultaneously with recording of the final plat, the trail easement shall be
recorded.
G. Prior to issuance of any building permits, which may impose additional requirements, the
developer shall comply with the following:
1. Meet any Fire Department emergency access requirements for during construction.
2. The subdivider shall furnish the City with evidence of recording of the final plat and trail
easement.
92
Pursuant to Section 14:6-7.5(F) of the Zoning Ordinance, the City will require execution of a
development agreement as a condition of approval of the Final P.U.D. The development
agreement shall address those issues which the City Council deems appropriate and necessary.
Reviewed for Administration:
Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
93
CONSENT ITEM # 6
RESOLUTION NO. 01-101
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK ON
STORM SEWER PONDS, LIFT STATIONS, FORCE MAIN,
RETAINING WALLS & APPURTENANT WORK
CITY PROJECT NOS. 00-02, 00-04, & 00-06
CONTRACT NO. 71-00
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated July 5, 2000, Thomas & Sons
Construction, Inc. has satisfactorily completed storm sewer ponds, lift stations, force
main, retaining walls, and appurtenant work as per Contract No. 71-00.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
94
RESOLUTION NO. 101-102
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK ON
CONTRACT SEALCOATING
CITY PROJECT NO. 01-11
CONTRACT NO. 43-01
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as
follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated May 7, 2001, Allied Blacktop has
satisfactorily completed the contract sealcoating as per Contract No. 43-01.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the
work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council September 4, 2001
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
95
CONSENT ITEM # 7a
OFFICIAL MINUTES
ST. LOUIS PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS ADVISORY COMMISSION
MAY 10, 2001 7:00PM
ST. LOUIS PARK SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bruce Browning, Rick Dworsky, Dale Hartman, Ken Huiras,
Bob Jacobson, Mary Jean Overend
MEMBERS ABSENT: John Herbert
STAFF PRESENT: Reg Dunlap, Civic TV Coordinator, John McHugh,
Community TV Coordinator
OTHERS PRESENT; Charlie Fiss, St. Louis Park High School Video Technician,
and Tom Marble, School District Technology Coordinator
1. Call to order
Chair Huiras called the meeting to order at 7:05pm.
2. Roll Call
Present at roll call were Ken Huiras, Bruce Browning, Dale Hartman, and Bob
Jacobson. Mary Jean Overend arrived at 7:06pm and Rick Dworsky arrived at 7:20pm.
3. Approval of minutes for December 7, 2000
Moved by Bruce Browning, seconded by Bob Jacobson. Motion passed unanimously.
4. Adoption of Agenda
Moved by Bob Jacobson, seconded by Bruce Browning. Motion passed unanimously.
5. Old Business--None
6. New Business
A. School District funding for 2001
Mr. Dunlap said that perhaps this is the year to fix the annual grant process, which in the
past has varied between extremely informal and micro-management. He said that
Commissioner John Herbert was unable to attend, but wanted this comment passed along:
that he (Commissioner Herbert) would be willing to assist drafting an agreement to
specify the expectations of the School District and City, since he has worked on similar
agreements in the past.
Mr. Marble said the School District is trying to get a clear understanding of what is
needed for this grant. Mr. Fiss said that he receives more calls now requesting
information on when programs will be run. Mr. Marble described how the classroom
instruction and program production has improved as a result of the grants for new
equipment in the last few years. One goal is to begin producing a video yearbook again
96
with contributions from many students, a contrast to earlier versions where a few very
motivated students did all the work. Mr. Fiss said that the new digital camcorders and
editing equipment have made a huge difference with the students, as reported on end of
year surveys: it’s easier to learn and they are being productive and having fun with it.
Commissioner Jacobson said that the money was well spent, that this feedback was
needed by the Commission, and asked what else can be done to help?
Mr. Marble said that the focus to date has been on the Senior High School, and that he
would like to put similar equipment in place at the other schools. The schools already
have the I Mac computers and the editing software comes with it, so what they need are
digital camcorders and additional computer storage for the editing works in progress.
Mr. Fiss described other equipment that was in poor condition: the studio video switcher
and cameras that date to 1987 and 1991. He would like to add a teleprompter to the
studio, which would help doing a student news show, and buy a higher quality digital
camcorder and tripod for staff to use to record events.
Mr. Marble said the goal was to use the 2nd studio space as a TV studio again, which is
currently used for storage. The distance learning project ended a while back when state
grant funding was cut and the Picture Tel codec ceased working. He said in past years,
the franchise fee grant was used to pay students to cable cast shows, which is no longer
done because of the automated system purchased by franchise fees several years ago.
But Mr. Marble would like to start paying students to cover events, so there is a core
group of skilled students that can be counted on.
Commissioner Overend asked how much increase they were asking for? Mr. Fiss said
about $15,000 for equipment, including:
Studio video switcher $4,800
Fluid head tripod 400
Camcorder for staff 3,000
Teleprompter 3,000
2 student camcorders 1,600
4 external hard drives for editing storage 2,100
Total equipment request $14,900
Commissioner Overend asked if there was a plan over a few years for new equipment,
and if the specific request could be put in writing. Mr. Fiss said yes to both, and that the
request would be forwarded to the Cable TV office before the end of the school year.
Commissioner Jacobson asked if there were any conditions on how the equipment will be
used. Mr. Marble said it would be stipulated in the future, as it is now, that the
equipment is used to produce programming for the District’s channel. He also said that
he could provide a breakdown of how all grant funds have been spent, to allay concerns
about accountability.
97
Commissioner Dworsky said he would like to see a strategy to equip the second TV
studio, and Mr. Marble said that would be developed.
Mr. Dunlap asked for the Commission’s opinion of the discussion, to expedite action at
the next meeting in August after review of the District’s specific proposal. The
consensus was expressed by Commissioners Browning and Huiras, that they liked the
direction we were heading.
B. School District request for a second educational access channel
John McHugh said that the consensus gathered in talks & emails with Mr. Fiss that an
uninterruptable power supply (UPS)was the most important missing component that the
District needed to provide full time NASA coverage on the proposed second School
District dedicated channel, and that the City proposed to buy one along with the signal
generating equipment needed to provide the channel. Mr. Marble said that even a UPS
wouldn’t help with the loss of electrical service that would occur July 4-8 while the
building is being remodeled.
Commissioner Overend asked what else, in addition to NASA, would be seen on a
second School District channel? Mr. Marble said the missions usually run for 8-10 days,
and that NASA has other programming as well. Commissioner Overend said that
community health care was an area of great need, and could be an important part of a new
channel.
Chair Huiras asked what needed to be done, since the franchise says the District is
entitled to 2 more channels. Mr. McHugh said historically, Time Warner has added other
channels after the new year, so it shouldn’t be hard to add another PEG channel. How
rapidly they can provide one is unknown. It depends if the City paid TWC for new or
used channel modulators. Chair Huiras said to get the clock running and send the
required request, and the rest of the Commission concurred.
C. NASA/MNDOT
This was mostly covered in the previous item. Mr. McHugh said MNDOT had been on
channel 96 for months and had been more reliable lately, but not yet reliable enough for
morning drive time when no staff is around to reset the Windows NT computer, which
frequently loses its internet connection.
D. High Definition TV & Must Carry rules as applied to cable systems
Mr. Dunlap reports that standards are still being negotiated, but that some cable systems
are offering HBO in high definition. This item will be updated at a later meeting.
E. Legislative update
Mr. Dunlap said that six St. Louis Park officials would attend the May 19 MACTA
Legislative Luncheon, including Councilmember Chris Nelson.
98
F. Election of Officers
Commissioner Jacobson moved the same slate as last year; Commissioner Dworsky
seconded. Unanimously re-elected were Chair Ken Huiras and Vice-Chair Bruce
Browning.
7. Reports
8. Communications from the Chair
Chair Huiras requested that one additional item be added to the August 9 agenda, that the
Time Warner Customer Service Manager (Deb Squire) be invited to attend the meeting to
give an update for the Commission.
9. Communications from City staff
Mr. Dunlap said Time Warner has supplied free cable TV to the Cop Shop at TexaTonka
and has installed Roadrunner high speed online service for an ongoing rate of about $140
per month.
Mr. McHugh distributed a draft copy of the Community TV newsletter which will be sent
soon.
Mr. McHugh also raised the issue of a Time Warner outage on January 30 which cut off
service (except local channels 14, 15, 17 & 96) to all of St. Louis Park from 4:30pm –
8:30pm, and was not listed on their monthly report. Commissioner Jacobson
recommended that staff draft a letter to Time Warner asking why the outage wasn’t listed
and asking what steps were being taken to prevent similar problems in the future.
Commissioner Browning concurred.
10. Adjournment Motion passed at 9:13pm.
The majority of the Commission and staff took a brief tour of the School District’s edit
stations to examine the gear purchased with franchise fees last summer.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reg Dunlap
Civic TV Coordinator
99
CONSENT ITEM # 7b
August 24, 2001
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
AIRTOUCH CELLULAR TELEPHONE 576.25
ALBERS MECHANICAL SERVICES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 658.00
ALBINSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 131.24
ANDERSON, KIRSTEN AQUATIC PARK GROUP ADMIN 27.50
ARAMARK UNIFORM CORPORATE ACCT GENERAL SUPPLIES 705.23
ARMADILLO TRUCKVAULT INC. MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT (150.00)
ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 101.07
BAKHTIARI, MOHAMMAD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 50.00
BCA/CJDN CONFERENCE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 50.00
BERNDT ELECTRIC SERVICE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 284.57
BERSHEID, GARY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 197.03
BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 639.00
BOB BARKER COMPANY INC SUBSISTENCE SUPPLIES 140.85
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.98
BOT, SUZANNE M MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 93.15
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 351.71
BRATT TREE COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 10,077.24
BRIGGS, CHERYL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 257.72
BROADWAY AWARDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.88
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BULTHIUS, CURT ADULT SOFTBALL 125.00
BYRD, MELISSA MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 36.57
CALGON CARBON CORPORATION EQUIPMENT PARTS 63.48
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 705.08
CARSTENS, MELISSA FACILITY RENTALS - taxable 10.00
CARTRIDGE CARE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 139.03
CENTER FOR ENERGY & ENVIRONMEN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30,082.80
CHEYENNE LAND COMPANY CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
CITY OF CRYSTAL TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 165.00
COLLINS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 16,028.51
COLLISYS ELECTRIC CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,038.00
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 105.00
COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29.00
CONCEPT SEATING INC GENERAL SUPPLIES (180.00)
CRABB, BRIAN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
CROWN MARKING INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.00
CSC CREDIT SERVICES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 60.00
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 171.38
DHARAMDAS, DHARAMPAUL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
DISCOVERY CLUB AQUATIC PARK GROUP ADMIN 11.00
DJ'S MUNICIPAL SUPPLY CO. SMALL TOOLS 236.96
DOCK RITE INC BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 7,233.48
DUNDEE NURSERY LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 101.13
EAGLE POINT SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 3,000.00
EARTHGRAINS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 265.12
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.67
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (30.67)
FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 120.00
FORCE AMERICA INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 26.61
100
FUNCHARACTERS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 130.00
G & K SERVICES CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 67.31
GARELICK STEEL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES (2.57)
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (27.83)
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 75.00
HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,579.92
HOME DEPOT/GECF GENERAL SUPPLIES 66.99
HRENO, PATRICIA MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 132.93
HYDRO SUPPLY COMPANY OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,866.45
ICMA OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,200.00
INDUSTRIAL METALS INC. ADULT SOFTBALL 125.00
INTERSTATE BEARING COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS 234.77
J H LARSON COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 52.76
JAK TREES INC. CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 1,931.48
JAYTECH INC BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 316.08
JERRY STAMM BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 3.29
JEWISH FAMILY/CHILDREN SVC OF OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,977.00
JUSTUS LUMBER COMPANY GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.96
KLUND, ERIN GENERAL SUPPLIES 54.50
KNUTSON, JULI CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
LACAL EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (235.63)
LAKEVIEW ADVENTURE CLUB AQUATIC PARK GROUP ADMIN 18.00
LANGEFELS, DOUGLAS GENERAL SUPPLIES 42.32
LEAGUE OF MN CITIES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 43.04
LEE, KATIE MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 120.75
LEWIS, RICHARD CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
LOWRY, SARAH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
MACQUEEN EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 472.41
MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 757.50
MATTHEWS LAWN SERVICE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,437.75
MEDSOFT CORPORATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 249.00
MENARDS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 15.14
METROCALL TELEPHONE 7.23
METROPOLITAN COUNCIL CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 206,425.27
MID-AMERICA BUSINESS SYSTEMS EQUIPMENT PARTS 109.20
MIDWEST ASPHALT CORP OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 684.53
MINIKAHDA OAKS NEIGHBORHOOD AS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 387.11
MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS AS TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 294.00
MINUTEMAN PRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 44.00
MN DRIVER & VEHICLE SVCS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGE (46.00)
MNAPA TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 170.00
MUNICILITE EQUIPMENT PARTS 226.63
NAPA GENUINE PARTS CO/FINANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 317.16
NATL NOTARY ASSOCIATION SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 36.00
NOCKEL, IGOR CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
NORTHERN WATER TREATING CO BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 599.33
NSP CO ELECTRIC SERVICE 3,280.86
NYSTROM PUBLISHING PRINTING & PUBLISHING 10,533.91
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 558.18
OFFICE TEAM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,315.68
ON SITE SANITATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,382.93
ONE CALL CONCEPTS INC RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 483.20
101
OTTO PACKAGING MIDWEST LLC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES (72.00)
PAPER WAREHOUSE-GENERAL OFFICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 296.91
PARK NICOLLET CLINIC HSM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,020.01
PARK PET HOSPITAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 642.00
PARK VALLEY CATHOLIC SCHOOL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 190.00
PEPSI-COLA COMPANY CONCESSION SUPPLIES 2,089.66
PHILION, THOMAS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
PLANT DISEASE CLINIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 20.00
PORTER, MITCH CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
POSTMASTER POSTAGE 450.76
PRINTERS SERVICE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 28.30
PRO PRODUCTS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES (92.32)
PUMP & METER SERVICE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 161.88
RAINBOW TREE CARE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 7,497.60
RC INDENTIFICATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.40
RECREONICS ETAL GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.69
RECYCLING ASSOCIATION OF MINNE SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 120.00
RELIANT ENERGY HEATING GAS 4,352.90
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS (55.35)
SA-AG INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 16,659.41
SAFETY-KLEEN BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 235.46
SAM'S CLUB GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,406.34
SCHARBER & SONS INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (3.51)
SIEGEL DISPLAY PRODUCTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 144.77
SLP CRIME PREVENTION FUND UNREALIZED REV-SAFETY CAMP 0.00
SOUTH SIDE ELECTRIC INC. ELECTRICAL PERMIT 33.17
SPANNAUS, SUSAN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,110.07
STREICHER'S GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.26
SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS 132.82
SUBURBAN TIRE CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 8.01
SWEENEY BROS TRACTOR EQUIPMENT PARTS (138.42)
SYMPHONY INFORMATION SERVICES OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT 1,500.00
TARGET/DAYTONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 69.20
TATAREK, CHRIS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 212.67
THARP, ANN CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
THE ROSE COMPANY INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 699.28
TIME WARNER CABLE TELEPHONE 147.41
TWIN CITY OPTICAL CO TREE MAINTENANCE (12.86)
TWIN CITY OXYGEN CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.96
U S WEST COMMUNICATIONS TELEPHONE 115.56
U S WEST INTERPRISE TELEPHONE 1,553.33
UNITED PARENTING OTHER ADVERTISING 263.00
VALLEY VIEW ASSOCIATES EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 204.25
WASTE MANAGEMENT GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 118.04
WASTE MANAGEMENT-BLAINE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 158,947.68
WASTE NEWS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 39.00
WATSON CO INC CONCESSION SUPPLIES 7,028.48
WELLS FARGO REMITTANCE CTR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 492.88
WEST, JAMIE MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 105.40
WESTSIDE OFFICE PARK ZONING/SUBDIVISION FEES 350.00
WHEELER LUMBER OPERATIONS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,526.04
102
WISCONSIN MAGNETO INC EQUIPMENT PARTS 33.45
WM H MC COY PETROLEUM FUELS OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 92.66
WOLF RIDGE ELC GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,115.40
WOODS, MELISSA CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 25.00
WSB ASSOCIATES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,342.50
ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 60.00
ZIP SORT POSTAGE 129.48
558,276.08
August 31, 2001
VENDOR NAME DESCRIPTION AMOUNT
ADVANCED BAR CODE SOLUTION INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 200.62
ALBRECHT MARY STUDY INCENTIVE & MERIT PAY 406.80
ALMSTEAD'S SUPERVALU CONCESSION SUPPLIES 106.09
ANCHOR PAPER CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.50
ARAMARK UNIFORM CORPORATE
ACCT
GENERAL SUPPLIES 350.15
ARMADILLO TRUCKVAULT INC. MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT (150.00)
ASPEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,148.00
BOBS PERSONAL COFFEE SERVICE GENERAL SUPPLIES 424.55
BOYER TRUCK PARTS EQUIPMENT PARTS 558.06
BROADWAY RENTAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT (1.66)
BRONX PARK NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCI OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 304.51
BURNETT, BETH & MORLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 196.80
BUZZ TOOL & DIE CO EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 70.00
BYRD, PORTIA OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50.00
CAHNERS BUSINESS INFORMATION PRINTING & PUBLISHING 270.58
CAMBAR GENERAL SUPPLIES 175.17
CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROFESSIONAL LEGAL SERVICES 1,398.51
CAMPBELL, MARY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 272.34
CAPITOL COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 59.77
CARTRIDGE CARE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 609.55
CED SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 54.00
CITY OF CRYSTAL TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 33.00
CONCEPT SEATING INC GENERAL SUPPLIES (180.00)
CROWN TROPHY GENERAL SUPPLIES 241.45
CUMMINS NORTH CENTRAL INC EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 228.07
DIVERSIFIED INSPECTIONS INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 999.90
DOCK RITE INC BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 120.00
E & S ELECTRONICS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 436.14
E GROUP INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 572.00
EARTHGRAINS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 137.61
ED M. FELD EQUIPMENT CO. GENERAL SUPPLIES 444.00
EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 187.50
ELECTRIC DESIGN COMPANY EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,212.44
EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,934.25
ENGELMAN,CHERYL MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 183.89
ENGINEERING REPRO SYSTEMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 93.63
ERDMAN, KATIE MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 16.97
ERV'S LAWN MOWER REPAIR EQUIPMENT PARTS 90.42
FACTORY MOTOR PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (30.67)
GARDNER HARDWARE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 517.59
103
GARELICK STEEL CO GENERAL SUPPLIES (2.57)
GENUINE PARTS COMPANY EQUIPMENT PARTS (27.83)
GRAINGER INC, W W BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 120.80
HALLBERG MARINE INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 719.21
HASLERUD, CARRIE CONCESSION SUPPLIES 75.90
HAWKINS WATER TREATMENT GROUP GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,007.29
HENN CO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY COMPUTER SERVICES 433.19
HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER SUBSISTENCE SERVICE 4,049.50
HOME DEPOT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 165.79
HOME DEPOT/GECF GENERAL SUPPLIES 289.52
HUIRAS, SHIRLEY GENERAL SUPPLIES 251.13
IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 96.23
INVER HILLS COMMUNITY COLLEGE TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 895.00
IOS CAPITAL RENTAL EQUIPMENT 686.93
J-CRAFT INC. EQUIPMENT PARTS 204.83
KELLY GREEN IRRIGATION PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,338.29
KENNEDY & GRAVEN LEGAL SERVICES 130.64
KRZESOWIAK, SARAH MEETING EXPENSE 42.57
LACAL EQUIPMENT INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (235.63)
LEAGUE MN CITIES INS TRUST PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 60,578.25
LOGIS COMPUTER SERVICES 36,700.97
MACQUEEN EQUIP CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 138.45
MASTERSON PERSONNEL INC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 768.75
MC HUGH, JOHN T OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 68.04
MENARDS BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 59.00
MIDWEST MAILING SYSTEMS INC POSTAGE 58.70
MINNESOTA INSTITUTE LEGAL EDUC TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 145.00
MINNESOTA THUNDER PRO SOCCER FACILITY RENTALS - taxable 100.00
MINUTEMAN PRESS OFFICE SUPPLIES 44.00
MN DRIVER & VEHICLE SVCS EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT CHARGE (46.00)
MOBILE RADIO ENGINEERING EQUIPMENT PARTS 94.79
MULCAHY CO INC, BERNARD J BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 617.70
NAPA GENUINE PARTS CO/FINANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 399.04
NORTHERN WATER TREATING CO GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.15
NORTHLAND CHEMICAL CORP GENERAL SUPPLIES 56.46
NSP CO ELECTRIC SERVICE 52,871.84
OFFICE DEPOT OFFICE SUPPLIES 590.71
ON SITE SANITATION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 270.63
OPERATING ENGINEERS TRAINING TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 300.00
ORONO KARE FOR KIDS AQUATIC PARK GROUP ADMIN 137.50
OTTO PACKAGING MIDWEST LLC BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES (72.00)
PC SOLUTIONS INC. EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 184.41
PETERSON, DEB OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 60.00
PIONEER RIM & WHEEL CO EQUIPMENT PARTS 120.13
PLAYWORKS AQUATIC PARK GROUP ADMIN 44.00
PRINTERS SERVICE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 84.90
PRO PRODUCTS INC GENERAL SUPPLIES (92.32)
RANDY'S SANITATION INC GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 2,623.30
REMACKEL WELDING & MFG. NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 1,541.00
RIGID HITCH INCORPORATED EQUIPMENT PARTS (55.35)
ROBYN JACOBS-SPAULDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 40.63
SCHARBER & SONS INC EQUIPMENT PARTS (3.51)
104
SCHROEDER SPORTS LCBS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,322.63
SCHWAAB INC GENERAL SUPPLIES 511.50
SECURITYLINK FROM AMERITECH OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 36.10
SHARE, JOHN & JO ANN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 51.00
SLP CRIME PREVENTION FUND UNREALIZED REV-SAFETY CAMP 0.00
SOUTHDALE YMCA AQUATIC PARK GROUP ADMIN 87.50
SPS COMPANIES INC OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 109.62
ST. LOUIS PARK CARDINALS FACILITY RENTALS - taxable 100.00
STREICHER'S EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,459.15
STROTH, NANCY MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 20.70
SUBURBAN PROPANE MOTOR FUELS 67.22
SUBURBAN TIRE CO TIRES 133.30
SWEENEY BROS TRACTOR EQUIPMENT PARTS (138.42)
TENNANT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 2,584.85
TERMINIX INTERNATIONAL BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 52.18
TWIN CITY OPTICAL CO TREE MAINTENANCE (12.86)
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 20.00
VIDEOMAKER SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 18.97
VIKING BUSINESS INTERIORS INC NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT 94.79
VISIONARY SYSTEMS LTD EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,160.00
VOLUNTEER FIREMAN'S BENEFIT AS OTHER INSURANCE BENEFITS 855.00
WALSER FORD EQUIPMENT PARTS 151.71
WATSON CO INC CONCESSION SUPPLIES 1,375.66
WEBSTER, ERIC BUILDING PERMIT 128.37
WELLS FARGO REMITTANCE CTR TRAINING/CONFERENCES/SCHOOLS 7,776.58
WIRED SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 12.00
WM H MC COY PETROLEUM FUELS GENERAL SUPPLIES 25.56
YMCA CAMP IHDUHAPI OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.00
ZIMMERMAN, JEAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41.25
ZIP PRINTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.59
ZIP SORT POSTAGE 291.99
207,021.43