HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003/02/03 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA SUMMARY
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
February 3, 2003
7:30 p.m.
6:00 p.m. - Board and Commission Interviews, Westwood Room
7:00 p.m. – Reception for Ron Latz
7:25 p.m. – Economic Development Authority
Study Session to immediately follow Council meeting
1. Call to Order
a. Pledge of Allegiance
b. Roll Call
2. Presentations
a. Human Rights Award Document
b. Dave Just Appreciation
c. Harlan Backlund Recognition
3. Approval of Minutes
a. City Council Minutes of January 21, 2003 Document
b. City Council Special Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2003 Document
c. Study Session Minutes of January 21, 2003 Document
Action: Corrections/amendments to minutes - Minutes approved as presented
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need
no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
Action: Motion to approve the agenda as presented and to approve items listed on
the consent calendar
(Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, motion to move items
from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion and to approve those items
remaining on the consent calendar).
5. Boards and Commissions
6. Public Hearings
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public - None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions
8a. Traffic and Environmental Studies – Park Nicollet Clinic Campus Expansion
Document
Recommended
Action:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the following two
motions:
§ Authorize preparation of an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet relating to the proposed expansion of the Park
Nicollet Clinic campus
§ Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a contract
with SRF Consulting Group Inc. for purposes of undertaking
preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and
necessary traffic and parking analysis for the proposed Park
Nicollet Clinic campus expansion initiative with the
understanding that Park Nicollet Health Services will
reimburse the City for a portion of the costs associated with
these activities.
8b. Request by Hennepin County for support of legislative initiative regarding
County HRA levy authority Document
Recommended
Action:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution supporting
special legislation proposed by the Hennepin County which
would amend state statute to not require approval by the City of
St. Louis Park for the implementation of a Hennepin County
HRA levy in St. Louis Park.
8c. Police Sergeant Contract Changes for 1/1/03 – 12/31/03 Document
A 1-year agreement for Sergeants was reached settling the City and Union for
2003.
Recommended
Action:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution approving a Labor Agreement between the City and
Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) #218, establishing
terms and conditions of employment for one year: 1/1/03 –
12/31/03.
8d. Approval of 2003 Liquor License Renewals Document
Request of Council to approve year 2003 liquor license renewals for on-sale, off-
sale, Sunday-sale, club and wine intoxicating liquor and off-sale and on-sale 3.2%
malt liquor. License year to run March 1, 2003 through February 28, 2004.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve renewal of licenses
8e. City of St. Louis Park’s Representation on the Board of Managers of Project
for Pride in Living’s Louisiana Court Limited Liability Company Document
This report considers adoption of a Resolution to designate the City’s
representative to Project for Pride in Living’s (PPL) Louisiana Court’s Limited
Liability Company (LLC) Board of Managers.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a Resolution designating Council Member Sally
Velick as the City of St. Louis Park’s representative to the Board
of Managers of Project for Pride in Living’s Louisiana Court
Limited Liability Company..
9. Communications
10. Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make
arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD
952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
ST. LOUIS PARK CITY COUNCIL
MEETING OF February 3, 2003
SECTION 4: CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need
no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
4a Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing installation of “One-Way” signage
and “Do Not Enter” signage on the “T” portion of the alley in the 2900 block of
Salem/Toledo Avenue South to provide for travel in the east-bound direction only
Document
4b Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing installation and special assessment of a fire
sprinkler system at 3387 Brownlow Avenue and directing the Mayor and City Manager
to execute a special assessment agreement with the property owner Document
4c Motion to approve resolution adopting City Policy for Public Purpose Expenditures
Document
4d Motion to adopt a resolution approving the minor amendment to the continued Special
Permit requested by Village Green to allow changes to the approved building elevations
Document
4e Motion to adopt a resolution accepting purchase of lighting poles/fixtures and approving
final payment to MN Electric Supply Company Document
4f Motion to approve a resolution recognizing Harlan Backlund Document
4g Motion to accept Housing Authority Minutes of December 11, 2002 for filing Document
4h Motion to accept Telecommunications Commission Minutes of December 5, 2002
Document
4i Motion to accept BOZA Minutes of October 24, 2002 Document
4j Motion to approve Vendor Claims (supplement)
AGENDA SUPPLEMENT
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
February 3, 2003
Items contained in this section are those items
which are not yet available in electronic format
and which are identified in the individual
reports by inclusion of the word “Supplement”.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 2a - Human Rights Award
Page 1 of 2
2a. Presentation of the City’s Annual Human Rights Award.
Background:
Each year, the St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission coordinates an award to honor
individuals and organizations that contribute to increasing understanding and cooperation
between people of different backgrounds. Award recipients are recognized as leaders
who support our vision of creating a community in which diversity is a natural part of
everyday life. Two recipients were chosen for 2002, an individual contributing in his
workplace and a youth program. Nominations are made by community members and the
winners are selected by the Human Rights Commission. The current commissioners are:
Matthew Armbrecht, Students Cassandra Boddy and Colleen Clark, Kristen Edsall,
Annie Gaffney, Julie Kirsch, David Oguamanam, Ganesh Rameshrathinam, Patrick
Rogers, Kristi Rudelius-Palmer and Chairperson Kristin Siegesmund.
2002 Award Recipients:
Stephen Olson
Stephen Olson, manager of leadership development at Park Nicollet Health Services, was
honored for his efforts to bring additional diversity training and education to Park
Nicollet staff. Since Olson initiated a needs assessment two years ago, he has facilitated
a number of training sessions that have enhanced patient care and enriched employee
morale. He also has created an internal diversity web site for all Park Nicollet
employees.
Among Olson’s efforts was a learning day for nursing staff aimed at broadening
perspectives and fostering understanding of diversity issues related to inpatient care.
Olson also coordinated the development of two new classes for Park Nicollet employees:
“Meeting and Greeting Across Cultures” and “Providing Culturally Competent Care.”
The classes gave employees resources to effectively communicate with various cultures
at the individual, family and community level. He has also incorporated diversity
curriculum into Park Nicollet’s New Leader Orientation which trains future supervisors,
managers and administrators.
Yes Kids
Yes Kids was honored for making a difference in kids’ lives by offering programs with
“heart and soul” to youth ages 10 through 17. Located at 7600 Highway 7, Yes Kids
broadens experiences, builds cultural understanding and acceptance, and provides a
welcoming atmosphere where kids can make new friends and connect with adult mentors.
Yes Kids offers four programs that provide a safe place where young people can feel
listened to and valued:
= STAR, an after-school program for grade school students, promotes diversity,
patriotism, friendship, drug awareness and community service
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 2a - Human Rights Award
Page 2 of 2
= WOW is a program that focuses on fostering integrity, building skills to resist risky
behaviors, promoting self-esteem and providing a sense of purpose to junior high
students.
= Friday Night Live offers kids an opportunity to get together for fun each week from
7 to 9 p.m.
= Music Mayhem brings youth in grades 7 through 12 together for performances of
local student bands.
Prepared by: Martha McDonell, Outreach Coordinator and Commission Liaison
Through: Clint Pires, Deputy City Manager
Approved by:
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 3a - City Council Minutes of Jan. 21, 2003
Page 1 of 3
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
January 21, 2003
1. Call to Order
Mayor Jacobs called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
The following Councilmembers were present at roll call: Susan Sanger, Sue Santa, Sally
Velick, and Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Councilmember Jim Brimeyer was absent.
Councilmember Chris Nelson arrived at 7:32 p.m.
Also present were the City Manager (Mr. Meyer); City Attorney (Mr. Scott); City Clerk
(Ms. Reichert); and Recording Secretary (Ms. Samson).
2. Presentations
2a. Recognition for 2002 Outgoing Board and Commission Members
Mayor Jacobs recognized the following individuals for their service:
Charter Commission: Brian Leary
Human Rights Commission: Shep Harris, Herb Ibsen, Emily Wallace-Jackson
Parks & Recreation: Gretchen Halvorson, Ashley Tomoson
Planning Commission: Michael Garelick
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. City Council Meeting of January 6, 2003
From Mayor Jacobs: Item 7a, Page 3, Paragraph 5: delete off-street and replace with
on-street.
3b. City Council Special Meeting Minutes of January 7, 2003
The minutes were approved as presented.
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 3a - City Council Minutes of Jan. 21, 2003
Page 2 of 3
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or
which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a
Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the
regular agenda for discussion.
4a Pay Equity
4b Adopt Resolution No. 03-006 rescinding certain resolutions related to parking
restrictions on Park Commons Drive, Grand Way & Wolfe Parway; adopt
Resolution No. 03-007 authorizing parking restrictions on Excelsior Boulevard,
Park Commons Drive, Grand Way Wolfe Parkway, Meridian Lane and Princeton;
and adopt Resolution No. 03-008 exempting areas of Park Commons Drive,
Wolfe Parkway, Meridian Lane, and Princeton Lane from city snow removal
ordinance and establishing snow removal restrictions during certain dates.
4c Approve Stormwater Facility Maintenance Agreement with the Minnehaha Creek
Watershed District to sweep Excelsior Boulevard between Wooddale Avenue and
Xenwood Avenue in the spring and fall of each year
4d Adopt Resolution No. 03-009 authorizing installation of permit parking in front
of 3104 Colorado Avenue South
4e Accept and file Planning Commission Minutes of November 6, 2002
4f Accept and file Planning Commission Minutes of December 4, 2002
4g Accept and file Charter Commission Minutes of August 14, 2002
4h Accept and file Charter Commission Minutes of October 9, 2002
4i Approve Resolution No. 03-010 to Amend Housing Improvement Fee for the
Cedar Trails Condominium Association
4j Motion to accept Vendor Claim Report for filing (supplement)
It was moved by Councilmember Velick, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve
the Agenda and items listed on the Consent Calendar.
The motion passed 5-0.
5. Boards and Commissions: None
6. Public Hearings
6a. Public Hearing to consider granting an off-sale liquor license to Great Bottle
of Wine, Inc., 3947 Excelsior Blvd., St. Louis Park
City Clerk Cindy Reichert said Jeffrey Uellmen has made an application to operate an
off-sale liquor store at 3947 Excelsior Blvd. Ms. Reichert reported that a majority of
Great Bottle of Wine’s sales will be done via the Internet, and the small retail shop will
display a limited amount of wines.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 3a - City Council Minutes of Jan. 21, 2003
Page 3 of 3
Mayor Jacobs opened the public hearing. With no one wishing to speak, Mayor Jacobs
closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Nelson asked who the property owner is, and Mr. Uellmen responded
that Miller Management is the property owner of 3947 Excelsior Blvd. Mr. Uellmen said
only wine will be available for sale.
It was moved by Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to
approve an off-sale intoxicating liquor license.
The motion passed 5-0.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public: None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions
8a. Resolution appointing Councilmember for At-Large A seat.
Resolution No. 03-005
It was moved by Councilmember Sanger, seconded by Councilmember Santa, to adopt
Resolution No. 03-005 appointing Paul Gregory Omodt to the office of At-Large A
Councilmember effective January 21, 2003.
The motion passed 5-0.
Paul Gregory Omodt was sworn in by City Clerk Cindy Reichert as the At-Large A
Councilmember effective January 21, 2003 for the remainder of the term to expire on
January 5, 2004.
9. Communications: None
10. Adjournment
Mayor Jacobs adjourned the meeting at 7:42 p.m.
________________________________________ ____________________________________
City Clerk Mayor
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 3b - Special Mtg Minutes of Jan. 16, 2003
Page 1 of 1
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING
January 16, 2003
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Susan Sanger, Susan Santa, Sally Velick, Jim
Brimeyer, Chris Nelson and Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Also present were the City Manager (Mr. Meyer); and the City Clerk (Ms. Reichert).
Council Vacancy
The Council convened in the Westwood Room to discuss candidates for the council vacancy
created by the election of Ron Latz to the State Legislature.
A motion directing staff to prepare a resolution for the meeting of January 21, 2003 appointing
Mr. Paul Omodt to the City Council At Large A seat was made by Councilmember Brimeyer and
seconded by Councilmember Santa. Motion passed unanimously.
Communications
Councilmember Brimeyer raised the issue of councilmember participation in PERA (Public
Employee’s Retirement Fund). He had been misinformed when first elected and therefore did
not participate as a PERA member until he began his second term. He asked if council would
endorse an effort to seek special legislation correcting the error. Other councilmembers also
noted that they, too, had been misinformed. The City Manager stated that he would look further
into the issue.
The meeting adjourned at 7:57 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 3c - Study Session Minutes of Jan.21, 2003
Page 1 of 2
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
January 21, 2003
The meeting convened at 7:46 p.m.
Present at the meeting were Councilmembers Chris Nelson, Susan Sanger, Sue Santa, Sally
Velick, and Mayor Jeff Jacobs.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Meyer), Community Development Director (Mr. Harmening),
Housing Supervisor (Ms. Schnitker), and City Clerk (Ms. Reichert).
1. Project for Pride in Living Board Representative
The Louisiana Court Redevelopment Contract allows for the City to have representation on
Project for Pride in Living’s (PPL) Limited Partnership Board of Directors. The purpose of this
representation is to ensure that the City’s and Housing Authority’s input and concerns are
addressed on an ongoing basis. The City has discretion to select representation and may consider
delegating representation to the HA Board. Ron Latz has been serving as the City’s
representative and with his departure, Council met to discuss and select a new representative
Following brief discussion, Council agreed that Sally Velick, Councilmember Ward 4, would
best represent the City on the PPL Board. Staff will place a resolution appointing
councilmember Velick on the next regular meeting agenda.
2. Housing
Staff and council met to discuss the planned series of joint meetings between the City Council,
Planning Commission, Housing Authority, School Board and business representatives to discuss
the status of housing in St. Louis Park. Council reviewed a summary of the proposed approach
for the initiative and an agenda for the initial meeting of all participants.
Councilmember Nelson asked that as the process is conveyed to participants and interested
public, that staff and councilmembers be cognizant of how that presentation is made.
Councilmember Sanger suggested that a component be added regarding the vision housing goals
and if those goals are still valid. She also asked that information regarding transitional housing
be included.
Mr. Meyer asked Council to consider how expectations of attendees can be managed and how
individuals that may come to the table with single-issue goals can be engaged in a broad
discussion of housing in our community.
Mr. Harmening pointed out that when presenting to potential participants, it was made clear that
this is a City Council driven process and that the council was the decision making body. He
stated that he hopes this process gives all involved a good understanding of where are are today
in terms of the kinds of housing available to city residents.
Councilmember Velick asked that we discuss preservation of existing housing stock. Mr.
Harmening responded that the issue would be discussed for both single family and multi family
housing.
Mr. Harmening also asked for Council’s assistance in staying on task during the initial meeting
which is intended to be an educational session more than an open discussion.
3. Public Purpose Expenditures
Mr. Meyer introduced the issue stating that in July of 2002, the Office of the State Auditor
(OSA) issued a report questioning various spending practices of the City of Brooklyn Park. Due
to the questions that were raised in Brooklyn Park, staff felt it would be in our best interest to
review our practices and develop a policy regarding public purpose expenditures.
Following discussion council directed staff to bring the policy forward for adoption at the next
regular meeting.
4. Adjournment
The meeting concluded at 8:45 p.m.
City Clerk Mayor
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4a - Salem-Toledo Alley One wayTraffic Restrictions
Page 1 of 2
4a. Traffic Study No. 573: Motion to adopt the attached resolution authorizing
installation of “One-Way” signage and “Do Not Enter” signage on the “T”
portion of the alley in the 2900 block of Salem/Toledo Avenue South to provide
for travel in the east-bound direction only
Background: In the fall of 2002 the City received a petition for constructing a concrete alley in
the 2900 block of Salem/Toledo Avenue South. The alley petition was determined to be
adequate at the Council’s August 19, 2002 meeting. The City Engineer’s Report for the alley
construction will be brought before the Council at a future meeting. During the two
neighborhood meetings that were held, residents and the St. George's Episcopal Church
requested the “T” portion of the alley be made a “one-way” in the east-bound direction.
Residents and the church feel there is a significant amount of cut-thru traffic, during peak hours,
as people avoid the traffic signal at Toledo and Minnetonka Boulevard to access Trunk Highway
100, north-bound. People also tend to increase speed in the alley and residents feel this would
stop both the cut-thru traffic and reduce speeds.
Staff has reviewed this request and supports the installation of traffic signage to make the “T”
portion of the alley “one-way” in the east-bound direction. During the neighborhood meetings it
was suggested that a trial period of six (6) months to one (1) year be implemented. Residents
supported that idea with the understanding that should the one-way prove to be unworkable, the
residents could request its removal.
Staff recommends the “T” portion of the alley in the 2900 block of Salem/Toledo Avenues be
designated a one-way east-bound for a period of one (1) year at which time staff will revisit the
issue with residents to verify its continuation.
Recommendation: Staff has identified the following options available to the Council at this
time:
* 1. Approve the request. If so, the attached resolution authorizing the installation of
one-way signage regulations may be utilized.
2. Deny the request.
3. Ask for additional information/study on the request.
* Staff’s recommendation action.
Attachments: Map (Supplement)
Resolution
Prepared by: Carton B. Moore, Superintendent of Engineering
Reviewed by: Maria A. Hagen, City Engineer
Michael P. Rardin, Director of Public Works
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4a - Salem-Toledo Alley One wayTraffic Restrictions
Page 2 of 2
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. __________
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION
OF “ONE-WAY” SIGNAGE ON THE “T” PORTION
OF ALLEY IN THE 2900 BLOCK OF
SALEM/TOLEDO AVENUE SOUTH TO PROVIDE FOR TRAVEL
IN THE EAST-BOUND DIRECTION ONLY
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 573
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has been requested, has studied, and
has determined that traffic controls are necessary at this location.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Director of Public Works is hereby authorized to install “One-Way” signage and “Do
Not Enter” signage on the “T” portion of the alley in the 2900 block of Salem/Toledo
Avenue South so as to provide for travel in the east-bound direction only.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 3, 2003
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4b -Sprinkler Assessment, 3387 Brownlow
Page 1 of 2
4b. Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing installation and special assessment of a
fire sprinkler system at 3387 Brownlow Avenue and directing the Mayor and City
Manager to execute a special assessment agreement with the property owner.
Background:
Eleanor C. Speltz, owner of the commercial building at 3387 Brownlow Avenue has requested
that the City authorize the installation of an automatic fire suppression sprinkler system for the
building and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment
policy.
Analysis:
The special assessment policy for installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in existing
buildings was adopted by the City Council in 1995. The City promotes the installation of fire
suppression sprinkler systems and facilitates their installation to promote the general public
health, safety and welfare within the community.
The Building Code requires the installation of a fire sprinkler system in this building because of
major remodeling project in the building.. The property owner will be hiring a contractor to
install the sprinkler system throughout the building and bring it up to compliance with the
current code. Based on the proposed work the system qualifies for the City’s special assessment
program. The property owner has petitioned to the City to authorize the installation of the fire
sprinkler system and specially assess the cost of the installation. Sprinkler plans have been
submitted and approved by City staff. The total eligible cost of the installation has been
determined to be $28,412. An Administrative Fee of $150.00 will be added to the special
assessment.
Staff has determined the adequate funds are available through the Special Assessment
Construction Fund.
Prepared by: Bruce Johnson, Fire Marshall
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4b -Sprinkler Assessment, 3387 Brownlow
Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION AND SPECIAL ASSESSMENT OF
FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AT 3387 BROWNLOW AVENUE
WHEREAS, the Property Owner(s) at 3387 Brownlow Avenue (“Benefited Property”)
(has) have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the
installation of a fire sprinkler system in their commercial building on the Benefited Property; and
WHEREAS, the Property Owner(s) (has) have agreed to waive their right to a public
hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Fire Marshal related to the installation of the fire sprinkler system.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The petition from the Property Owner(s) requesting the approval and special
assessment for the fire sprinkler system is hereby accepted.
2. The installation of the fire sprinkler system in conformance with the plans and
specifications approved by the Fire Department and Department of Inspections is hereby
authorized.
3. The total estimated cost for the design and complete installation of the fire
sprinkler system is accepted at $28,412j
4. The Property Owner(s) (has) have agreed to waive their rights to a public hearing,
notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter
429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The Property Owner(s) agree(s) to pay the City for the cost of the above
improvements through special assessment over a ten (10) year period at seven percent (7%)
interest.
6. The Property Owner(s) agree(s) to execute an agreement with the City and any
other documents necessary to implement the installation of the fire sprinkler system and the
special assessment of all costs associated therewith.
Attest: Adopted by the City Council February 3, 2003
City Clerk Mayor
Reviewed for Administration:
City Manager
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4c - Public Purpose Expenditures
Page 1 of 6
4c. Motion to approve resolution adopting City Policy for Public Purpose Expenditures
Background: Council and staff have evaluated the validity of various city expenditures in terms
of whether there is a public purpose for the expenditure; and whether there is specific or implied
authority for the expenditure found in statute or charter.
Public purpose
The MN Supreme Court has emphasized that public purpose is an evolving concept that should
be interpreted liberally to effectively deal with the wide-ranging changes transforming society.
The court also stated “We have also recognized that public purpose should be broadly construed
to comport with the changing conditions of modern life.” R.E. Short Co. v. City of Minneapolis.
269 N.W.2d at 337 (citing City of Pipestone v. Madsen, 287 Minn. 155, 210 N. W. 2d 298
(1973)). It is significant that the court has accorded great deference to a local governing body’s
determination that an expenditure is for a public purpose. The Court has said that a strong
presumption exists that public officials are acting appropriately when making spending
decisions. Therefore, what constitutes a public purpose is largely a matter of city council
discretion.
City authority
With regard to the “authority test,” a Minnesota municipal corporation has only such powers as
are expressly conferred upon it by statute or its charter, or necessarily implied there from. In St.
Louis Park, Section 1.02 of the City Charter provides that the City “Shall have and exercise all
powers, functions, rights and privileges exercised by, or which are incidental to or inherent in,
municipal corporations and are not denied to it by the constitution or general laws of the State of
Minnesota.”
Public Purpose Expenditure Policy: Following review of public purpose and city authority, a
public purpose expenditure policy was developed for City Council adoption. The attached policy
authorizes expenditures relating to the use of funds for meetings; membership and dues;
employee service recognition; employee retirement recognition; and the annual employee
recognition meal, program and lunch
Attachment: Resolution and Policy (Appendix A to resolution)
Prepared by: Nancy Gohman, Human Resources Director
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4c - Public Purpose Expenditures
Page 2 of 6
RESOLUTION NO. 03-______
RESOLUTION ADDING PUBLIC PURPOSE EXPENDITURE POLICY
TO THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK PERSONNEL MANUAL
WHEREAS, The City Council wishes to adopt policies which ensure adequate
compensation, leave and benefits for city employees and which protect the ethical standards of
the City of St. Louis Park; and
WHEREAS, The City Council has conferred upon the City Manager the power to
establish and administer additional administrative policies and rules as may be appropriate to
administer the employment practices of the City.
NOW THEREFORE LET IT BE RESOLVED THAT, The City Council of the City of St.
Louis Park hereby adopts the Public Purpose Expenditure Policy (attached as Exhibit A) to be
added to the personnel manual.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council December 2, 2002
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4c - Public Purpose Expenditures
Page 3 of 6
APPENDIX A
RESOLUTION NO. 03-_________
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
PUBLIC PURPOSE EXPENDITURE POLICY
Every City of St. Louis Park expenditure must be valid based upon the public purpose for which
it is purchased and the specific or implied authority for the expenditure found in the City Charter
or State Law. Section 1.02 of the City Charter provides that the City “Shall have and exercise all
powers, functions, rights and privileges exercised by, or which are incidental to or inherent in,
municipal corporations and are not denied to it by the constitution or general laws of the State of
Minnesota.” Minnesota Statutes § 412.111 provides that the City Council may fix the
compensation of all officers and employees. The City Council has determined that the
expenditures below are for a public purpose authorized by law or charter.
Meetings: food/meals
The City Council recognizes that situations in which city business needs to be discussed can and
do occur during meal hours (i.e. luncheon meetings). In addition, there are public and employee
meetings and events in which reasonable refreshments may add to the success of the meeting
and/or event or create a more productive work force. Meals are allowed at training or meetings
only when they are part of a meeting or training involving official city business and when it is
the only practical time to meet. The following items are deemed to meet the Council definition
of public purpose expenditures in regards to food and meals.
• Meals and refreshments are allowed at city meetings and events that have a purpose of
discussing city issues. These meetings would normally have a pre-planned agenda.
• Meals and refreshments are allowed at employee meetings and events that have a purpose of
discussing city issues or are a part of an employee training. These meetings would also
normally have a pre-planned agenda. This does not include routine staff meetings.
• Meals and refreshments are allowed when they are part of a breakfast/lunch/dinner meeting
for official city business when it is the only practical time to meet. Usually these meals
involve meeting with Councilmembers, committee/commission members, or local
business/service organizations.
• Meals and refreshments are allowed during official meetings of the City Council, Council
committees, advisory boards/commissions, and taskforces.
• Expense reimbursement for travel expenses for employees are outlined in the personnel
policy, as approved by Council resolution 01-078.
• Coffee is provided by the city for employees at city buildings.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4c - Public Purpose Expenditures
Page 4 of 6
• Refreshments are allowed at welcome break, open to staff several times per year, to allow
employees time to network and meet new staff members.
• CITE (the Committee to Inform and Train Employees) is recognized as the employee
committee, which is responsible for organizing and sponsoring various city employee
training and networking activities. CITE expenditures are for food, refreshments and various
expenses which encourages employees to work together to serve the city. CITE must obtain
pre-approval from Human Resources to expend up to $1,500 per calendar year for planned
employee activities. CITE funds must be approved and part of the general fund.
• Meals and refreshments are allowed at the annual City Volunteer recognition event.
• Meals and refreshments are allowed for the annual seasonal/temporary employee recognition
lunch.
• The City will not purchase or reimburse any Employee, Councilmember or Agent for the
purchase of intoxicating liquor or malt beverages.
Membership and Dues
The City Council has determined that the city will fund memberships and dues for the City,
Councilmembers and its employees in professional organizations and city social and community
organizations when the purpose is to promote, advertise, improve, or develop the city’s resources
and advantages and not personal interest or gain.
Membership in the Local Chamber of Commerce
The Mission of the TwinWest Chamber of Commerce is, in part, to improve the business
environment and build a better community. Toward that end, the St. Louis Park Business
Council was formed as a forum for local businesses and government to work together to ensure
that business opportunitites in St. Louis Park are diverse and progressive, and that laws, rules and
procedures enacted by local government are conducive to business operations in the City.
Section 1.02 of the City Charter grants the City “power to deal with all matters of municipal
concern” and the City Council has determined that it serves a public purpose for the City of St.
Louis Park to maintain membership in the Twinwest Chamber of Commerce and to participate as
an equal partner in the St. Louis Park Business Council as a means of promoting, advertising,
improving, and developing the economic resources of the City.
Employee Service Recognition Program
As approved by Council Resolution 00-055, effective January 1, 2000 the City of St. Louis Park
will recognize the longevity of its employees by presenting awards for years of service. The
Employee Service Recognition Program will recognize all benefit earning regular and part-time
employees who work 20 or more hours a week, year round for the City of St. Louis Park.
Awards will be presented to employees on the date of their employment anniversary by the City
Manager and the department director. The department director will arrange a meeting with the
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4c - Public Purpose Expenditures
Page 5 of 6
City Manager to present the service award to the employee. Employees will receive the
following awards in recognition for their years of service with the city:
5 yrs. Awards such as a City of St. Louis Park sweatshirt, an engraved pen, or an engraved
coffee mug and a personalized letter given to the employee (expense ranging from $12 to
$30 or $30 gift certificate).
10 yrs Awards such as an engraved paperweight or engraved key chain and a personalized letter
given to the employee (expense ranging from $30-$40 or $40 gift certificate).
15 yrs Awards such as an engraved letter opener, pocket knife or desk clock and a personalized
letter given to the employee (expense ranging from $40 - $50 or a $50 gift certificate).
20 yrs. Awards such as a larger desk clock, stein, or a gift of employee’s choice and a
personalized letter given to the employee (expense ranging from $50 - $60 or a $60 gift
certificate).
25 yrs. Awards such as an engraved wall clock, a wrist or pocket watch, or a gift of employee’s
choice and a personalized letter given to the employee (expense ranging from $60-$70 or
a $70 gift certificate).
30 yrs. Awards such as those presented for 25 years of service and a personalized letter given to
the employee or an $80 gift certificate
35+ Awards such as those presented for 30 years of service and a personalized letter given to
the employee or an $90 gift certificate
An employee is given the option of choosing a gift from the category of their appropriate years
of service or a gift from any category for lesser years of service, or a gift certificate in the
amount listed.
Employee Retirement Recognition Program
As approved by Council Resolution 00-055, effective January 1, 2000, the City of St. Louis Park
will recognize employees when they retire or depart from the city in good standing by presenting
awards based on their years of service. The employee retirement recognition program will
recognize all benefit earning regular and part-time employees who work 20 or more hours a
week, year round for the City of St. Louis Park.
Awarded upon retirement of employee:
• 5-9 years: Framed certificate of appreciation from mayor and City Manager
• 10-19 years: Personalized certificate of appreciation giving thanks for the work and
dedication of the retiring employee mounted on a plague and presented by the City Manager.
• 20+ years: Plaque and resolution presented by City Manager and City Council.
All awards will be presented by the City Council and City Manager at a Council meeting
following the resignation.
Annual Employee Recognition Meal, Program and Lunch
Annually, the City will sponsor an employee recognition meal and program at which employees
and paid-on-call firefighters reaching 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30 and 30+ years of service will be
recognized. The program will also include the City Council and City Manager recognizing
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4c - Public Purpose Expenditures
Page 6 of 6
department and employee accomplishments. Employees and paid-on-call Firefighters who are
recognized and their spouse or guest will have their meal provided for at no cost. The city will
provide an amount to off set the cost of the meal for employees, paid-on-call firefighters and
members of the Council who attend the recognition program. The city will pay for a lunch for
all employees and paid-on-call firefighters during employee recognition week. Cost of the
elements of the recognition meal, program and lunch will be included in the human resources
budget.
Financial considerations
Funding for any expenditure above must be included in the appropriate department budget.
Village Park Apartments
February 3, 2003
Page 1
4d. Motion to adopt a resolution approving the minor amendment to the continued
Special Permit requested by Village Green to allow changes to the approved
building elevations.
Background:
On November 16, 1970, the St. Louis Park City Council adopted Resolution # 4091 granting
approval of a special permit to develop a 4 story, 186-unit apartment building at 301 Shelard
Parkway.
On November 2, 1981, the City Council passed Resolution #7002 granting an amendment to the
Special permit allowing an expansion to the westerly parking lot. This parking lot expansion
was not constructed.
On October 7, 2002, the City Council approved another minor amendment to revise the
landscape plan as part of a remodeling project for the apartment complex. Other projects
currently underway include interior renovations, and repainting and repairs to the building
exterior. These changes required administrative approval only.
Village Green, who recently acquired this apartment complex, is now requesting another
amendment to modify the building elevations. They are proposing to add bronze colored metal
sunscreens to the façade of the building. The proposed resolution (attached) is for a minor
amendment to the existing special permit to incorporate the proposed building elevation
additions.
Analysis:
Does the proposal meet the Zoning Code requirements for amending a Special Permit?
Section 36-36 of the Zoning Code states that properties subject to a continued special permit
must comply with all provisions of that special permit. Assuming such compliance, the property
may be expanded, altered or modified provided such change complies with applicable provisions
of the Zoning Code and does not result in an expansion or intensification of any existing non-
conformity. Any existing non-conformity shall be brought to greater or complete compliance to
other provisions of the ordinance to the extent reasonable and possible. Finally, according to
Section 36-405, routine maintenance and nonstructural repairs and alterations are permitted on
non-conforming structures provided such repairs do not extend the economic life of the structure.
As stated, the applicant recently acquired this property and is working on renovations. Building
permits were obtained in the fall of 2002 for interior remodeling and for repairs to the exterior
siding. The existing exterior siding consists of T-11 panels. T-11 panels are textured sheets of
plywood that have vertical grooves. The exterior hard siding is painted. This was approved
under the original special permit, however by today’s ordinance standards is non-conforming.
Routine maintenance and nonstructural repairs are permitted on non-conforming structures;
Village Park Apartments
February 3, 2003
Page 2
therefore, a building permit was approved. The applicant has also proposed to repaint the exterior
with
neutral brown tones. Paint samples were submitted and approved by the Zoning Administrator
as complying with the ordinance’s architectural standards.
The applicant is now proposing to add medium bronze colored metal sunscreens (see attachment
for rendering) to the façade of the building. Their intent is to tie the exterior repairs and new
color schemes together and add aesthetic interest. Fifteen (15) sunscreens are proposed along the
north and east elevations (see site plan for locations) and would be placed over existing
windows. An additional sunscreen canopy is proposed over the main entrance to the amenity
building on the southeast elevation facing the parking lot. The applicant is also proposing
medium bronze brushed aluminum covers over the existing glass block windows at the
‘clubhouse’. These covers would also be on the southeast elevation. This location is designated
with hashed lines on the interior portion of the building on the site plan. At night these covers
will appear back lit.
Since acquiring this property, Village Green has worked with staff on renovations to the
property. This has brought the site into greater compliance with current ordinance standards.
Their recent amendment to the landscape plan is one such example. A lighting plan and sign
permit were also recently approved which brought the site lighting and signage into conformance
with the City’s ordinances. Staff believes the proposed sunscreens will provide design elements
that add definition and create variations that are compatible with the existing elevations.
Recommendation:
Staff recommends approval of the minor amendment to the existing Special Permit, subject to
the conditions in the resolution. (The amendments to the original resolution are underlined.)
Attachments:
Proposed Resolution
Site Map
Exhibit BB, Elevation Plan, and CC, Typical Elevations (Supplement)
Proposed elevations with sunscreens (Supplement)
Prepared By: Julie Grove, Associate Planner
Approved By: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. ____
Amends and Restates Resolution Nos. 02-103, 7002, 6983, 6808, 6767 and 6633
A RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 02-103
ADOPTED ON OCTOBER 7, 2002 AND GRANTING AMENDMENT TO AN
EXISTING SPECIAL PERMIT UNDER SECTION 36-36(d)(4) OF THE ST.
LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO ALLOW
MODIFICATIONS TO THE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED IN THE R-C MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT AT 301
SHELARD PARKWAY
FINDINGS
WHEREAS Village Green Companies has made application to the City Council for an
amendment to an existing special permit under Section 36-36(d)(4) of the St. Louis Park
Ordinance Code to allow modifications to the exterior elevations at 301 Shelard Parkway within
a R-C Multi-Family Residential Zoning District having the following legal description:
Lot 1, Block 3, Shelard Park
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the information related to Planning Case
Nos. 70-48-SP, 81-100-SP, 02-55-CUP, and 03-04-CUP and the effect of the proposed
modifications to the exterior elevations on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the
surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in
the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan; and compliance with
the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a special use permit was issued regarding the subject property pursuant to
Resolution No. 3907 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated February 2, 1970 which contained
conditions applicable to said property; and
WHEREAS, an amendment to the existing special permit was issued regarding the
subject property pursuant to Resolution No. 02-103 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated
October 7, 2002 which contained conditions applicable to said property; and
WHEREAS, due to changed circumstances, amendments to those conditions are now
necessary, requiring the amendment of that special use permit; and
WHEREAS, it is the intent of this resolution to continue and restate the conditions of the
permit granted by Resolution No. 3907 and amended by Resolution No. 02-103 to add the
amendments now required, and to consolidate all conditions applicable to the subject property in
this resolution;
WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case File 03-04-CUP are hereby entered into and
made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
CONCLUSION
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 02-103 (document not
filed) is hereby restated and amended by this resolution which continues and amends a special
permit to the subject property for the purposes of permitting modifications to the exterior
elevations within the R-C Multi- Family Residential District at the location described above
based on the following conditions:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the
following exhibits; Exhibit A-1, General Site Plan; Exhibit B, Final Plat of
Shelard Park, except as hereinafter modified.
2. The total number of dwelling units on Lot 1, Block 1; Lot 2, Block 2; Lots 1, 2
and 3, Block 3; Lot 1, Block 4; Lots 1 and 2, Block 5 shall not exceed 1508 units.
The combined floor area ratio for these lots shall not exceed 1.2; the ground floor
area ratio shall not exceed .2. Each dwelling unit shall be provided with 275
square feet of usable open space, 165.5 square feet per unit of which shall be
provided by the 6.7 acre park.
3. All dwelling units shall be above the grade of any land within 25 feet of all faces
of the building.
4. Curb cuts shall not be permitted within 150 feet of any intersection for properties
in the B-2 District.
5. No curb cuts are permitted on the northerly property line of Lot 3, Block 8, unless
a median strip is constructed in such a way to prohibit left turns.
6. Curb cuts shall not be permitted within 125 feet of any intersection for properties
in the R-B District.
7. All electric, gas, sewer, telephone and water services shall be underground.
8. Driveway slopes at pedestrian ways shall not exceed a grade of 3 percent.
9. A parkway strip shall be constructed along the north side of Shelard Parkway to
control access thereto until such time as there shall be an agreement between St.
Louis Park and Plymouth for joint use, access, construction and maintenance
thereof and until necessary street right-of-way in Plymouth is duly dedicated. No
access to that portion of Shelard Parkway in St. Louis Park shall be permitted
from Plymouth unless authorized by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park.
10. At least one bus stop area shall be provided (if the City and MTC authorize the
stop) and maintained on the north side of Highway 12 between Ford Road and
Shelard Parkway until such time as the service road system is removed.
11. All conveyance of any part or all lands within Shelard Park shall by covenant
restrict the use of each lot to the use shown on the General Site Plan, Exhibit A-1,
and the conditions of this special permit.
12. The perimeter of all parking lots, driveways, and internal roads shall have
concrete curbing of the B-6 type, except at pedestrian ways.
13. Lot 3, Block 7, Shelard Park shall be developed, used and maintained in
accordance with Exhibit G, Site Plan, Planting Plan; Exhibit I, Elevation Plan-
North and East; Exhibit J, Lower Level Parking Plan; and Exhibit K, Drainage
Plan except as hereafter modified and subject to the following conditions:
(a) The Pedestrian ways within the parking areas as shown on Exhibit G shall
be physically and clearly delineated through use of a surfacing material
different than the adjacent parking area.
(b) All improvements including landscaping, striping, surfacing, pedestrian
ways, buildings, benches, sidewalks, etc., as indicated on the plan, shall be
completed by December 31, 1970, or 30 days after receiving an occupancy
permit, whichever occurs first.
14. That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Shelard Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying westerly of a line drawn from a point on the northerly line of said Lot 1,
distance 32.5 feet easterly of the most westerly corner thereof to a point on the
southerly line of said Lot 2, distant 32.5 feet westerly of the most easterly corner
thereof shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibit L,
Plot Plan; Exhibit M, Landscape Plan; Exhibit N, Drainage Plan; Exhibit O, South
and East Elevation; Exhibit P, Basement Plan and Pool Building; except as
hereinafter modified and subject to the following condition:
(a) All improvements including landscaping, striping, surfacing, buildings,
recreational facilities, and pedestrian ways as indicated on the plan shall
be completed by June 15, 1972.
15. That part of Lots 1 and 2, Block 5, Shelard Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota,
lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the northerly line of said Lot 1,
distant 32.5 feet easterly of the most westerly corner thereof to a point on the
southerly line of said Lot 2, distant 32.5 feet westerly of the most easterly corner
thereof shall be developed, used and maintained for a full 3-story, 126-unit
apartment building in accordance with Exhibit S, Site Plan; Exhibit T, Landscape
Plan; Exhibit U, West-North-East Elevation, Wing A; Exhibit V, South-North-
West Elevation, Wing B; and Exhibit W, Grading Plan; except as hereinafter
modified and subject to the following conditions:
(a) Additional topographic mounds or other suitable treatment shall be
included in the side yards area adjacent to Ford Road.
(b) The area designated as an outdoor tennis court on the site plan shall be
retained on the site and in addition an imaginative play space for the
nursery school and the entire Shelard Park development shall be
developed on the site to the east of the tennis courts.
(c) All improvements including landscaping, striping, surfacing, concrete
curbs, buildings, on-site recreational facilities and all other items on the
exhibits shall be completed by June 10, 1972.
16. That Lot 1, Block 3, Shelard Park shall be developed, used and maintained for a
4-story, 186-unit apartment building in accordance with Exhibit X, Site Plan;
Exhibit Y, Drainage Plan; Exhibit Z, Landscape Plan; Exhibit AA, View of Entry;
Exhibit BB, Elevation Plan; and Exhibit CC, Typical Elevations; except as
hereinafter modified and subject to the following conditions:
(a) All improvements including landscaping, striping, surfacing, curbs,
buildings, improvements of open space and other items on the Exhibits
shall be completed by December 10, 1971. Exhibit Z, Landscape Plan is
modified by Exhibit DD. Exhibits BB, Elevation Plan; and CC, Typical
Elevations are modified by Exhibit EE1-EE2.
17. Because Lot 1, Block 3, exceeds the agreed-upon units by two, Lot 1, Block 4, is
hereby limited to 198 units instead of 200 units.
18. That Lot 2, Block 7, Shelard Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota, and that part of
Lot 1, Block 7, Shelard Park, lying easterly of a line drawn from a point on the
north line of said lot distant 64.51 feet westerly of the northeast corner of said lot
to a point on the south line of said lot distant 68.97 feet westerly of the southeast
corner of said lot shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with
Exhibit GG, Data Sheet; Exhibit HH, Landscape Plan; Exhibit II-JJ, Paving
Plan/Grading Plan (Exhibits GG, HH, II-JJ, all dated June 26, 1980); Exhibit KK,
West Elevation and East Elevation; Exhibit LL, North Elevation and South
Elevation; Exhibit MM, Parking Staging Plan; Exhibit NN, Arcade/Restaurant
Elevation Plan; Exhibit 00, Parking Ramp Floor Plans, pages 1-4; Exhibit PP,
Office Floor Plans, pages 1-6; Exhibit QQ, Building Section, and subject to the
following conditions:
(a) All rooftop equipment shall be screened.
(b) There shall be no outside storage of trash, storage containers, equipment,
materials or similar items.
(c) The reduction from the required off-street parking provision is hereby
permitted for property included in this condition with the understanding
that adequate off-street parking is the responsibility of the property owner
and in no case will designated plaza or landscaped area as contained on
the site plan be considered or used for parking.
(d) The office tower shall be fully sprinkled throughout with an automatic wet
system.
(e) The staging of construction of building and parking facilities shall be in
accordance with Exhibit MM, and all improvements on the site as shown
on the exhibits and including the parking ramp, striping, fire lanes and the
removal of temporary parking as shown on Exhibit MM shall be
completed by November 1, 1975. Landscaping shall be completed by
September 17, 1976.
19. That parking and directional signs be permitted in accordance with Exhibit UU,
Parking/Directional Sign Sheet SS7; Exhibit VV, Parking/Directional Sign Sheet
SS8; Exhibit WW, Sign Location Plan for Tower and Ramp, Sheet SS2; Exhibit
XX, Sign Location Plan for Tower and Ramp, Sheet SS3; Exhibit YY, Sign
Location Plan for Arcade, Sheet SS5; received May 9, 1975, with the following
conditions:
(a) The mounting height of parking and directional signs shall not exceed a
mounting height, in the case of free-standing signs, of 42 inches, except
for stop and yield signs.
(b) The words “Bar-Restaurant” shall be added to the Hippogriff sign in place
of the logo on Exhibit YY.
(c) The bank sign shown on Exhibit WW shall be deleted.
20. That a motor fuel station be permitted at the southwest corner of the parking ramp
on the first floor in accordance with the following conditions:
(a) The Parking ramp shall be modified to contain the station in accordance
with Exhibit ZZ, Tank and Vent Plan; and Exhibit AAA, Floor Plan.
(b) There shall be no advertising signs or identification signs of the facility on
the exterior of any of the buildings in Shelard Park, nor shall there be any
free-standing sign in Shelard Park identifying or advertising this use, nor
shall signs be located within the structure which shall be visible from the
exterior of the building identifying or advertising the use.
(c) The gasoline sales will be operated by General Mills Automotive Service
Center in conjunction with their existing center at their home office. The
facility will pump gasoline only and schedule cars to be taken out of
Shelard Park for mechanical work. The service will be available to
anyone who wishes to use it; it is not limited to Tower tenants or General
Mills personnel.
(d) Exterior vents, if any, shall be architecturally treated to be fully integrated
with the architecture of the building, and such vents shall be screened
from view to the extent possible.
(e) All construction, including walls, automatic door closures, tank
installation, access facilities to such tanks, and other features included in
the exhibits shall be completed on or before June 30, 1976, after which
time the site facilities shall be used and maintained as provided for in the
special permit.
21. That the first floor of the office tower may be used for retail purposes up to
10,805 square feet, and that the second floor may be used for a Class III restaurant
of 7,544 square feet in accordance with the following condition:
(a) The floor area of the first and second floor may be used in accordance
with Exhibit BBB, Request of Midwestern Finance, Inc. to amend Special
Permit to allow certain retail and cafeteria uses in the Shelard Office
Tower.
22. That the general plan for Shelard Park, Exhibit A, be amended to allow a hotel on
Lot 1, Block 7, convenience retail on Lot 1, Block 6, and office and commercial
use on Block 8 without convenience retail, if such convenience retail is provided
on Lot 1, Block 6.
23. That Block 8 be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with Exhibit
DDD, Building Location, Sheet P3; Exhibit EEE, Grading and Drainage Plan,
Sheet P4; Exhibit FFF, Landscape Plan, Sheet P5; Exhibit GGG, Parking Plan,
Sheet P6; Exhibit HHH, Lighting Plan, Sheet P7; and Exhibit III, Elevation Plans,
Sheets P8, P9, P10, P11 and P12.
(a) That the site contain no more than 12,000 square feet of retail space.
(b) That all improvements, including buildings, parking, landscaping,
pedestrian facilities, and other items as shown on the exhibits be
completed by June 15, 1980.
24. Lot 1, Block 1, Shelard Park, shall be developed in accordance with the following
conditions:
(a) The site shall be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with
Exhibit JJJ, Site Plan (dated October 25, 1978); Exhibit KKK, Grading
and Topography Plan; Exhibit LLL, Landscape Plan; Exhibit MMM,
Elevation Plan; Exhibit NNN, Unit Floor Plans; Exhibit 000, Garage
Plans.
(b) That all site work, including construction of buildings, parking,
landscaping, pool garages, and other items as shown on the exhibits be
completed by October 15, 1980.
(c) That condition 10 of this resolution shall not apply to Lot 1, Block 1,
Shelard Park.
25. A Class II restaurant shall be permitted on Lot 1, Block 6, Shelard Park in
accordance with the following conditions:
(a) The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with
Exhibit PPP, Site Plan/Landscape Plan; Exhibit QQQ, Elevation Plans;
and Exhibit RRR, Restaurant Floor Plans, except as amended by Exhibit
SSS, Front Elevation and Exhibit TTT, Rear Elevation.
(b) All improvements shown on the exhibits shall be completed by December
1, 1979.
26. A condominium development consisting of six buildings and a total of 48 units
shall be permitted on Lot 3, Block 3, Shelard Park, in accordance with the
following conditions:
(a) That the site be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with
Exhibit XXX, Site Plan, PA1; Exhibit YYY, Ground Floor Plan, PA2;
Exhibit ZZZ, Upper Floor Plan, PA3; Exhibit AAAA, Elevations, PA4;
and Exhibit WWW, Planting Plan.
(b) That the trees proposed along the westerly lot line be in a separated area
delineated by curbing and the base to be landscaped.
(c) That provisions be provided for watering the sod and landscape features in
the open-space areas by either providing outside water facilities adjacent
to the building or some form of water supply to these areas.
(d) That the trash container facilities be totally integrated with the architecture
of the building and garages, and that such areas provide for total
enclosures of such trash facilities.
(e) That the street trees required under the subdivision ordinance be planted
on or before November 1, 1979.
(f) That all construction, building, landscaping, parking area, garages, and
other elements contained on the exhibits be completed by June 15, 1980.
27. A condominium development consisting of 10 buildings and 80 total units shall
be permitted on that part of Lot 1, Block 4, Shelard Park, lying northerly of a line
and its extensions, said line is described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence North 15
degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 140.00 feet, along the easterly line of
said Lot 1, to the beginning of the line to be described; thence South 80
degrees 23 minutes 33 seconds West 558.49 feet to the westerly line of
said Lot 1, and there terminating.
in accordance with the following conditions:
(a) That the site be developed, used and maintained in accordance with
Exhibit A, Site Layout Plan; Exhibit B, Elevation (only); Exhibit C,
Planting Plan; Exhibit D, Surfacing Plan.
(b) That there shall be no outdoor trash storage.
(c) That all construction and improvements be completed by October 15,
1981.
28. That the use on the northerly 185 feet of Lot 1, Block 6, is hereby amended by
deleting convenience retail (as described in Condition No. 22) and allowing said
property to be used for an office building containing a gross area of 14,068 square
feet with the following conditions:
(a) The subject site be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with
Exhibits XXX-PL1, Building Location; YYY-L1, Planting Concept; and
ZZZ-PL3, Elevations.
(b) There be no outdoor storage of trash.
(c) Concrete curbing be poured in place.
(d) All construction of buildings, landscaping, curbing and striping be
completed by May 15, 1982.
29. That a ten story office building containing 216,442 square feet, parking ramp, and
skyway shall be permitted on the following described property:
Lot 1, Block 7, Shelard Park, except that part thereof lying easterly of a
line drawn from a point on the North line of said lot distant 64.51 feet
westerly of the northeast corner of said lot to a point on the South line of
said lot distant 68.97 feet westerly of the southeast corner of said lot,
according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the
County Recorder in and for Hennepin County, Minnesota and
That part of the east 10 rods of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 1, Township 117 North, Range 22 West of the 5th Principal
Meridian lying southerly of that part of Lot 1, Block 7, Shelard Park,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, which lies within said West Half; and lying
northerly of a line drawn easterly from and perpendicular to the west line
of said east 10 rods, from a point on said west line distant 36 feet
southerly, as measured along said west line from the most westerly corner
of said Lot 1, to the east line of said West Half and there terminating; all
according to the United States Government Survey thereof and situated in
Hennepin County, Minnesota.
and in accordance with the following conditions:
a. That the site be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with
Exhibit AAA, Site Plan; Exhibit BBB, Topographic Survey Sheet L1;
Exhibit CCC, Sheet L2, Grading and Drainage Plan; Exhibit DDD,
Landscape Plan Sheet L3; and Exhibit EEE, Electrical and Walkway Plan
Sheet E1; and Exhibit FFF, Elevation Plan Sheets A12, 13, 14 and 15.
b. That on-street parking on the east side of Ford Road be eliminated.
c. That the developer make provision for off-street parking for construction
workers during the construction of subject property.
d. That an easement be provided, if necessary, to accommodate a transit stop
and plaza on Ford Road adjacent to the subject property.
e. That the parking ramp contain a minimum of 729 spaces.
f. That all improvements, as shown on the exhibits and including, but not
limited to, office building, parking ramp, driveway and walkway
improvements, plaza, landscaping, and lighting be completed by October
15, 1982.
30. That a thirteen story hotel with a maximum of 309 rooms, a Class I Restaurant
and meeting rooms be permitted on the following described property:
Lot 2, and that part of Lot 1 lying southerly of a line and its extensions,
said line is described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of
said Lot 1; thence North 15 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds West 140.00
feet, along the easterly line of said Lot 1, to the beginning of the line to be
described; thence South 80 degrees 23 minutes 33 seconds West 558.49
feet to the westerly line of said Lot 1, and thence terminating. All in
Block 4, Shelard Park, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in
the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
and in accordance with the following conditions:
a. That the site be developed, used and maintained in accordance with
Exhibit GGG, Site Plan; Exhibit HHH, First Floor Plan; Exhibit III,
Second Floor Plan; Exhibit JJJ, Typical Upper Floor Plan; Exhibit KKK,
West Elevation; Exhibit LLL, South Elevation; Exhibit MMM, North
Elevation; Exhibit NNN, East Elevation; Exhibit 000, Landscape Plan;
Exhibit PPP, Landscape Plan/Shelard Parkway (with respect to Exhibit
PPP, developers, owners and their successors of the Hilton Hotel are
responsible for construction, planting, and maintenance and with the
option of mixing the percentage of Colorado Spruce and Black Hills
Spruce); Exhibit QQQ, Utility, Drainage and Water Augmentation Plan;
Exhibit RRR, Sign Plan, South Elevation (with respect to Hilton sign and
logo only); and Exhibit SSS (1-4), Lighting.
Exhibits HHH, III, and JJJ are to show the general layouts with minor
modifications allowed but not to increase the total number of units, total
net square footage in the restaurant, lounge or disco area, or the meeting
rooms.
b. That the maximum number of rooms not be greater than 309; that the
restaurant and lounge contain no more than 7,898 square feet of floor area;
and that there be no more than 12,602 square feet in meeting rooms.
c. That all outdoor parking lot lights mounted higher than eight feet off the
ground be directed perpendicular to the ground.
d. That there be no outside storage of trash or other materials.
e. That access to the frontage road be allowed provided a right turn lane
extending at least 100 feet to the east of said access is constructed and
provided the City is not required to pay or incur any cost for said access.
f. That the developer understands that no on-street parking is to be allowed
in Shelard Park and that it is the developer’s responsibility to make
provision for off-street parking for the construction workers during
development of the project.
g. That all improvements including buildings, parking lot, walkways,
landscaping and fencing be completed by October 15, 1983.
31. Use of Lot 1, Block 6, as provided for in Condition No. 28, is hereby amended to
permit construction of rooftop equipment as shown on Exhibit ZZZ-PL-4,
Elevations.
32. Extension of the westerly parking lot with a 186 unit apartment building located
on Lot 1, Block 3, Shelard Park, at 301 Shelard Parkway is hereby permitted
subject to the following conditions:
a. Prior to construction, a survey be made of this area identifying lot lines to
insure the proposed expansion is consistent with plans and does not extend
into public park.
b. All drainage from the expansion be to the existing storm sewer system in
the parking lot.
c. That at least eight Colorado Blue Spruce be planted along the westerly,
southerly, and southeasterly sides of the proposed expansion in addition to
the landscaping originally proposed by the applicant in this subject
request.
d. The applicant conform to previously approved plans for the subject
property by May 15, 1982 or submit an amendment to such plans by
March 1, 1982 which, if approved by the City, would supersede the
previous plan.
e. That the expansion of parking lot and new landscaping adjacent to the
expanded parking lot be completed by May 15, 1982.
33. The special permit shall be amended on October 7, 2002 to incorporate all of the
preceding conditions and add the following conditions:
a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official
exhibits per condition 16, including Exhibit DD, the revised Landscape Plan as
approved by the Zoning Administrator.
b. The applicant dedicate a permanent easement for sidewalk installation at the
corner of Shelard Parkway and Betty Crocker Drive within 60 days per approval
of the Public Works Director and the City Attorney.
34. The special permit shall be amended on February 3, 2003 to incorporate all of the
preceding conditions and add the following conditions:
a. Exhibits CC, Typical Elevations and BB, Elevation Plan, as provided for in Condition
No. 16 are amended as shown on Exhibit EE1-EE2.
b. The sunscreens and window covers must both be bronze colored aluminum and the
exterior color of the building be maintained in compatible colors as approved by the
Zoning Administrator.
Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant (or applicant and owner if
applicant is different from owner) prior to issuance of building permit.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 3, 2003
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
LOCATION MAP
F O R D R O A D
FORD LANE
SHELARDPARKW AYSHELARD PARK
301 Shelard Parkway
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4e - Final Payment to MN Electric Supply
Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. ______________
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUCHASE OF
STREET LIGHTING POLES/FIXTURES AND
BANNER POLES FOR EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD, PHASE III
CITY PROJECT NO. 99-05
CONTRACT NO. 66-02
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows:
1. Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated May 6, 2002, Minnesota Electric Supply
Company has satisfactorily supplied street lighting poles/fixtures and banner poles for
Excelsior Boulevard, Phase III as per Contract No. 66-02.
2. The Director of Public Works has filed his recommendations for final acceptance of the work.
3. The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The City Manager is
directed to make final payment on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 3, 2003
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4f - Resolution for Harlan Backlund
Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO.________
A RESOLUTION OF RECOGNITION FOR HARLAN BACKLUND
FOR HIS SERVICE TO THE COMMUNITY AND THE
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
WHEREAS, Harlan Backlund began his career with the Public Works
Department of the City of St. Louis Park on July 16, 1965; and
WHEREAS, he has served as a laborer in the Utility Department, transferred to
the Traffic Division as a maintenance worker in 1980, and later served as a supervisor in
the Traffic and Operations Divisions; and
WHEREAS, he was promoted to Public Works Traffic Superintendent on
February 1, 1985 and to Public Works Operations Superintendent on August 17, 1998;
and
WHEREAS, Harlan’s enthusiasm for this community shows with his involvement
and commitment with the “Adopt the Street Program”, traffic and pedestrian safety, and
fleet management practices.
NOW THERERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
St. Louis Park wish to express their sincere thanks to Harlan Backlund for his 37 years of
dedicated service and ask all citizens of St. Louis Park to join in wishing Harlan and long,
happy and well-deserved retirement.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 3, 2003
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4g - Housing Authority Minutes - Dec. 11 2002
Page 1 of 3
MINUTES
Housing Authority
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Wednesday, December 11, 2002
Westwood Room
5:00 p.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Catherine Courtney, William Gavzy, Judith Moore
MEMBERS ABSENT: Anne Mavity, Shone Row
STAFF PRESENT: Sharon Anderson, Jane Klesk, Michele Schnitker
1. Call to Order
The meeting was called to order at 5:10 p.m.
2. Approval of Minutes for November 13, 2002
The November 13, 2002 minutes were unanimously approved as amended.
3. Hearings: None
4. Reports and Committees: None
5. Unfinished Business: None
6. New Business
A. Housing Authority Annual Agency Plan – Draft Review
Ms. Schnitker explained minor changes to the Housing Authority Annual Agency
Plan and stated that the Public Hearing would be held on January 8, 2003. The
Capital Fund information has been updated, along with income and race
information relating to applicants on the waiting list.
B. Approval of Section 8 Payment Standards
Ms. Schnitker presented an overview of the 2003 Section 8 Payment Standards.
Following a discussion, Commissioner Courtney moved for approval of the
Section 8 Payment Standards for one and two-bedroom units at 105% of fair
market rent, and for three, four, and five-bedroom units at 110% of fair market
2
rent. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote
of 3-0, with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy and Moore voting in favor.
C. Approval of Amendment to the Section 8 Administrative Plan
Ms. Schnitker described several minor amendments to the Section 8
Administrative Plan. Commissioner Courtney moved that Resolution No. 508,
with changes to the fourth paragraph, "THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the
Housing Authority of St. Louis Park, that the amendments to Chapters, 2, 4, 7, 9,
10 and 12 of the Section 8 Administrative Plan, as noted in the attachments
hereto, be adopted. Commissioner Moore seconded the motion, and the motion
passed on a vote of 3-0, with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy and Moore voting
in favor.
D. Recording of Minutes – Discussion
Ms. Schnitker briefly described the issue of recording of minutes, what the
Housing Authority Board might consider to be an appropriate level of detail in
their minutes, and how other boards and commissions within the City record
minutes. After discussion, the Board agreed that the Housing Authority minutes
should be limited to the main point of any discussion relating to an action item or
issue.
7. Communications from Executive Director
A. Claims List No. 12-2002
Commissioner Courtney moved to ratify Claims List No. 12-2002. Commissioner
Moore seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-0, with
Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy and Moore voting in favor.
B. Communications
Ms. Schnitker advised the Board that communication had been received from
Bigos Management, owner of Lou Park, giving one year's notice to opt out of
their Section 8 commitment for thirty-two units. Should Bigos fail to recommit
after negotiations take place, HUD will issue vouchers to the residents living in
those apartments, and the St. Louis Park Housing Authority will administer
the vouchers.
(2) Scattered Site Houses and Hamilton House
Ms. Anderson spoke about recent terminations for scattered-site housing,
and stated there may be five or six properties turning over in the next six-
week period.
(4) Audit Correction – Section 8 Reserves
3
The Finance Department is waiting for HUD to respond to information
submitted to them concerning replenishment of reserves. Response should
be received by the January meeting.
8. Other –
9. Adjournment
Commissioner Moore moved for adjournment. Commissioner Courtney seconded the
motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 3-0 with Commissioners Courtney, Gavzy
and Moore voting in favor. The meeting was adjourned at 6:40 PM.
Respectfully Submitted,
Shone Row, Secretary
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4h -Telecommunications Minutes of 120502
Page 1 of 4
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
ST. LOUIS PARK TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
MEETING OF DECEMBER 5, 2002 at 7:00 p.m.
ST. LOUIS PARK CITY HALL, WESTWOOD ROOM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Bruce Browning, Dale Hartman, Ken Huiras, Bob
Jacobson, Mary Jean Overend, and Rolf Peterson
Rick Dworsky arrived at 8:52 p.m.
STAFF PRESENT: Reg Dunlap, Civic TV Coordinator and John McHugh,
Community TV Coordinator
OTHERS PRESENT: Arlen Mattern, Time Warner Cable Public Affairs
Administrator; Lance Leupold, Time Warner Cable
Director of Public Affairs; LuAnna Fogarty, Time Warner
Cable Service Manager; and Linda Samson, Recording
Secretary
1. Call to Order
Chair Hartman called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
2. Roll Call
Present at roll call were Commissioners Bruce Browning, Dale Hartman, Ken Huiras, Bob
Jacobson, Mary Jean Overend, and Rolf Peterson; City Staff Reg Dunlap and John McHugh;
and Recording Secretary Linda Samson.
3. Approval of Minutes for October 17, 2002
It was moved by Commissioner Huiras, seconded by Commissioner Browning, to approve the
minutes.
The motion passed 6-0.
4. Adoption of Agenda
It was moved by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Huiras, to approved
the agenda.
The motion passed 6-0.
5. Old Business
5A Time Warner Customer Service Update
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4h -Telecommunications Minutes of 120502
Page 2 of 4
Time Warner Cable Customer Service Manager LuAnna Fogarty provided a customer
service update. Ms. Fogarty said Time Warner has implemented a program called
Quality Approach, which includes a mystery caller segment and customer service
representative training. Customer service representatives are divided into three groups:
sales, billing, and technical calls. Ms. Fogarty reported that there are two individuals on
the quality assurance team who provide coaching to the customer service representatives.
Recent revisions to billing statements make them easier to read.
5B Update: Auditing Time Warner Cable Franchise Fees
Reg Dunlap reported that Scott Lewis’s report will be completed by the end of 2002. Mr.
Dunlap said most of the 1,000 addresses absent from Time Warner’s list but present on
the City’s address list have been identified as commercial, school or railroad addresses
that are irrelevant for cable service purposes.
5C Update: Channel 6 Deletion for Security Camera Use
Lance Leupold, Time Warner Cable Director of Public Affairs, briefly reviewed the
channel 6 issue, i.e., the elimination of channel 6 in exchange for security camera use in
several St. Louis Park apartment buildings. Mr. Leupold said Time Warner’s attorney
will contact the City’s attorney.
John McHugh said staff requested a written legal opinion from the City attorney. Mr.
McHugh read a portion of attorney Joel Jamnik’s e-mail response dated December 3,
2002:
Earlier last week I received a phone call from Gary Matz (legal counsel for
AOL/TW) regarding our concerns about the use of Channel 6 by some of the
City’s multiple dwelling units for security camera coverage. He quite subtly
explored whether we would consider looking the other way on their existing
customers. I indicated that while this probably isn’t the biggest concern or issue
facing the City, that the statute doesn’t provide us much flexibility, and that we
would continue to encourage them to get into compliance. I basically told him
that I couldn’t recommend that we ignore the law.
While that wasn’t what he was looking for, I think he was somewhat satisfied that
I was not going to recommend that we declare a default/material breech of the
franchise agreement and seek to seize their letter of credit.
Mr. McHugh said when he received the City attorney’s opinion, he sent a letter to Time
Warner asking that prior to tonight’s Telecommunications Commission meeting, Time
Warner submit a written legal opinion to explain how they think their activities in regard
to this matter are in compliance with State law.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4h -Telecommunications Minutes of 120502
Page 3 of 4
Mr. McHugh suggested Time Warner submit, within 30 days, a 90-day plan to cure this
situation at no cost to St. Louis Park subscribers or submit a written, binding opinion that
no such breech exists and the matter would then be referred to the City Council.
It was requested by Commissioner Dworsky that Time Warner Cable submit a written
proposal to John McHugh by January 10, 2003 to solve the channel 6 controversy, and
Mr. McHugh will send the proposal to the City Attorney.
5D Update: AOL Time Warner Restructuring
Mr. Dunlap reported the City Council approved a resolution regarding the AOL Time
Warner restructuring.
5E Bylaws Amendments
It was moved by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Browning, to
accept the bylaws as presented with the City Attorney’s change.
The motion passed 7-0.
The City Attorney’s recommendation is to delete the entire sentence regarding secret
ballots, i.e., delete Election may be held by secret ballot (see Article IV, Section 3,
Election of Officers).
5F FCC Forms 1205 and 1240 and Hiring Consultant to Review
Mr. Dunlap reported rental for converter boxes has increased $1, to $6.65 per month.
In their packets, Commissioners received an informational sheet regarding this item.
It was moved by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Browning, to have
staff gather information on rates in other cities and report back to the Commission by
October 1, 2003.
The motion passed 7-0.
5G Staff Draft Grant Proposal
This item was deferred to the next meeting.
6. New Business
6A Time Warner Cable New Rates and Changes in Channel Line-ups
Mr. Dunlap reported that Disney will be available on the standard tier and distributed a
summary of changes that will be adapted into a Council report.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4h -Telecommunications Minutes of 120502
Page 4 of 4
6B Set Meeting Schedule for 2003
The Telecommunications Commission’s meeting schedule for 2003 follows. The annual
joint meeting at a Council Study Session has yet to be scheduled with the City Manager’s
office.
Thursday, January 23, 2003
Thursday, May 8, 2003
Thursday, August 14, 2003
Thursday, October 9, 2003
Thursday, December 4, 2003
6C Brainstorm work plan for 2003
To be discussed at the January 23, 2003 meeting. Commissioner Dworsky said that one
work plan item should be an update on the Richochet wireless service that was installed
in St. Louis Park but then went bankrupt.
7. Reports
Commissioner Huiras requested the Time Warner survey results.
8. Communications from the Chair: None
9. Communications from City Staff: None
10. Adjournment
It was moved by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by Commissioner Browning, to
adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
The motion passed 7-0.
Minutes prepared by: Respectfully submitted by:
Linda Samson Reg Dunlap
Recording Secretary Civic TV Coordinator
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4i - BOZA Minutes of Oct. 24, 2002
Page 1 of 4
Board of Zoning Appeals/October 24, 2002
Page 1 of 4
MINUTES OCTOBER 24, 2002
BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
The St. Louis Park Board of Zoning Appeals Committee conducted a regular meeting on
Thursday, October 24, 2002, at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis
Park, Minnesota.
Members Present: Chair James Gainsley
Vice Chair Susan Bloyer
Commissioner Tom Powers
Members Absent: Commissioner Ryan Burt
Commissioner Paul Roberts
Staff Present: Janet Jeremiah, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Tara Olson, Community Development Secretary
1. CALL TO ORDER – ROLL CALL
Chair Gainsley called the regular meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
2. APPROVE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COMMITTEE MINUTES
Motion by Commissioner Powers, seconded by Commissioner Bloyer, to approve the following
minutes as presented with the following corrections:
Page 3, amend Commissioner Powers stated that he feels that allowing the applicant to build in
the restricted area would have a large effect on the adjoining property.
Page 5, amend Commissioner Powers stated although he has sympathy for the front window he
does not feel the person should build in the restricted area.
1) Board of Zoning Appeals Committee public hearing and regular meeting minutes dated
August 22, 2002.
Motion by Commissioner Powers, seconded by Commissioner Bloyer, that the regular meeting
minutes dated August 22, 2002 are approved with the above corrections.
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Gainsley, Bloyer and Powers. Voting No: None.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4i - BOZA Minutes of Oct. 24, 2002
Page 2 of 4
Board of Zoning Appeals/October 24, 2002
Page 2 of 4
3. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Case No. 02-50-VAR - The request of Benjamin Rost for variances from the
requirements of Section 36-164(f)(5) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to allow a 3.4
foot side yard setback instead of the required 5 feet and a 4 foot side yard setback instead
of the required 5 5/8 feet for a garage addition and living space more than 40 feet in length
for the property located in the “R-2” Single Family Residential District at 3206 Alabama
Avenue South.
Ms. Jeremiah stated to the Commissioners that Mr. Rost has submitted a letter of withdrawal.
She recommends closing the public hearing and a motion accepting the letter of withdrawal.
Motion by Commissioner Bloyer, seconded by Commissioner Powers, that the variance be
withdrawn.
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Gainsley, Bloyer and Powers. Voting No: None.
4. PUBLIC HEARINGS/COMMITTEE BUSINESS
B. Case No. 02-57-VAR - Request of Charles and Janis Chell for variance from the
requirements of Section 36-164(f)(6) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a
front yard setback of 25.5 feet instead of the required 32.26 feet for property located in the
R-2 Single Family Residential District at 3305 Glenhurst Avenue South.
Mr. Morrison presented the report and concluded that all seven findings have been met and
recommends that the Board of Zoning Appeals approve the applicant’s request for a variance to
permit a front setback of 25.5 feet instead of the required 32.26 feet for a front porch for the
property of 3305 Glenhurst Avenue South.
Commissioner Bloyer asked staff what the average size home in the R-2 Single Family District?
Ms. Jeremiah stated that an exact calculation hasn’t been performed at this time and since there
have been many additions over time it would be a fairly onerous task to put together. However,
information that was recently reviewed on realtor sales shows that the average home for sale in
St. Louis Park is more than the size of this applicant’s home.
Commissioner Bloyer asked staff if the sizes of each room are known.
Ms. Jeremiah stated that the applicant hadn’t submitted a detailed floor plan, but that maybe the
applicants could answer that.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4i - BOZA Minutes of Oct. 24, 2002
Page 3 of 4
Board of Zoning Appeals/October 24, 2002
Page 3 of 4
With no more questions, Chair Gainsley opened the public hearing.
Charles and Janis Chell applicant of 3305 Glenhurst Avenue, stated that his home is square
shaped and is 747 square feet total, so the estimated size of the living room is 10 x 14 feet along
with each of the two-bedrooms estimated at 10 x 10 feet the home also includes a single bath and
a kitchen. The living room-main home entrance doesn’t contain a closet which is difficult but
with the three season porch that would elevate that problem along with giving more space for
family entertaining. Also, a letter of support has been received from several neighbors.
Chair Gainsley stated he would like the Commissioners to review the letter of neighboring
support and add to staff’s file as exhibit A.
Commissioner Powers asked Mr. Chell if an addition could be constructed on the rear of the
home and if so what existing living space would be affected?
Mr. Chell stated a bedroom and a newly remodeled kitchen.
Commissioner Bloyer asked Mr. Chell the size of his existing kitchen.
Mr. Chell stated the newly remodeled kitchen is estimated at 10 x 10 feet.
Ms. Chell stated that if they were to add onto the rear of the house that would not assist them
with the closet that is needed for the front entryway, which presently is a significant problem.
With no more questions, Chair Gainsley closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Powers stated he agrees with staff’s findings but would like to point out that a
comprehensive study of the city-zoning ordinance is especially needed for move-up housing.
Commissioner Bloyer stated she is in support of granting this variance.
Chair Gainsley stated the variance is justifiable but does question the idea of averaging
requirements of the zoning ordinance that it is still within the intent of the ordinance, but that
may be only finding that may not be met.
Motion by Commissioner Powers, seconded by Commissioner Bloyer, that the variance granted
approve the applicant’s request for a variance to permit a front setback of 25.5 feet instead of the
required 32.26 feet for a front porch for the property located in the R-2 Single Family Residential
District of 3305 Glenhurst Avenue South.
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 4i - BOZA Minutes of Oct. 24, 2002
Page 4 of 4
Board of Zoning Appeals/October 24, 2002
Page 4 of 4
Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Gainsley, Bloyer and Powers. Voting No: None.
5. Old Business:
None
6. New Business:
None
7. Communications:
Chair Gainsley stated he would like to change the meeting time for the training session to 5:30
p.m. instead of the scheduled 6:00 p.m. due to several applications being received for the
December Board of Zoning Appeals agenda which may not allow the training session and
adequate amount of time.
8. Miscellaneous:
None
9. Adjournment:
Commissioner Bloyer moved and Commissioner Powers seconded the motion for adjournment.
The regular meeting of the Board of Zoning Appeals adjourned at 7:26 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Tara Olson
Community Development Secretary
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8a - Park Nicollet Traffic Environ Studies
Page 1 of 2
8a. Traffic and Environmental Studies – Park Nicollet Clinic Campus Expansion
Recommended
Action:
Staff recommends the City Council approve the following two
motions:
§ Authorize preparation of an Environmental Assessment
Worksheet relating to the proposed expansion of the Park
Nicollet Clinic campus
§ Authorize the Mayor and City Manager to execute a contract
with SRF Consulting Group Inc. for purposes of undertaking
preparation of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet and
necessary traffic and parking analysis for the proposed Park
Nicollet Clinic campus expansion initiative with the
understanding that Park Nicollet Health Services will reimburse
the City for a portion of the costs associated with these activities.
Background: Last November the City Council authorized execution of a contract with SRF for
the purpose of preparing an environmental, traffic and parking analysis of a proposed expansion
to the Methodist Hospital campus. Although the City is the client of SRF, Park Nicollet Health
Services (PNHS) is paying the City for the cost of the studies, which is approximately $103,000.
SRF was recommended as the consultant due to their previous work in the Excelsior Boulevard
area, the Elmwood Study as well as PNHS’s past experience with them. For these same reasons,
SRF is proposed to be the consultant for the Clinic campus analysis.
At the time staff presented the Methodist studies to the City Council, staff indicated that a similar
proposal would be brought to the City Council in the near future, relative to the Park Nicollet
Clinic campus expansion. Since November, City and PNHS staff have been working on the
necessary scope of work for the environmental and traffic analysis for the clinic campus. In
addition, City, SRF and PNHS staff met with neighborhood leaders adjacent to the Park Nicollet
Clinic campus to receive their input on concerns or issues they desired to have addressed in the
studies. These comments and concerns have been incorporated into the scopes of work that are
attached.
As Park Nicollet, the City and SRF began developing the scopes of work, it became evident that
certain pieces of the analyses were not entirely the financial responsibility of PNHS. Examples
of this include certain intersection analysis requested by the neighborhoods, certain cut-through
traffic analysis, a feasibility analysis of a proposed new bridge over Highway 100 at the
Wooddale extension [as recommended by the Elmwood study] and other similar feasibility
analyses which have a relationship to the larger area. As such, City staff asked SRF to provide a
memorandum outlining their recommendations for a proposed cost split between the City and
PNHS. Attached is a copy of this memorandum. What follows is a summary of the costs of the
various analyses and their proposed cost apportionment:
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8a - Park Nicollet Traffic Environ Studies
Page 2 of 2
• Environmental Assessment Worksheet preparation – $63,174. Park Nicollet would be
responsible for 100% of this cost.
• Traffic, parking and concept design analysis – $178,897. Park Nicollet’s share would be
$115,481; the City’s share would be $63,416.
City staff has reviewed this closely with PNHS staff. PNHS has agreed to the recommended cost
apportionment.
The proposed funding source for the City’s share of this study is proceeds from the HRA levy
which the City has undertaken in 2002 and 2003. At the time the City approved the HRA levy, it
was noted that this revenue was to be used for current or future infrastructure improvements
related to redevelopment projects. Staff feels that the activities being done under the traffic
study are directly related to the planning and design for future infrastructure improvements in an
area that is redeveloping [Elmwood area, Park Commons, etc.]
Recommendation:
Staff is recommending that the City enter into a contract with SRF Consulting to undertake the
preparation of the EAW and the traffic and parking analysis with the understanding that Park
Nicollet Health Services will reimburse the City for a portion of the costs associated with these
activities.
Attachments:
§ Draft Contract and Scope of Work (Supplement)
Prepared By: Tom Harmening, Community Development Director
Approved By: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8b - Hennepin County HRA Levy
Page 1 of 4
8b. Request by Hennepin County for support of legislative initiative regarding
County HRA levy authority
Recommended
Action:
Staff recommends the City Council adopt a resolution supporting
special legislation proposed by the Hennepin County which
would amend state statute to not require approval by the City of
St. Louis Park for the implementation of a Hennepin County
HRA levy in St. Louis Park.
Background:
The Hennepin County HRA has the authority to levy a special tax to address housing and
community development needs in the County, just as the City has the authority to do so in St.
Louis Park. Cities within the County must approve Hennepin County HRA programs and
projects that might occur in a given city. Currently, the law also requires that certain cities—St.
Louis Park, Minneapolis, Hopkins, and Robbinsdale—approve the ability for the Hennepin
County HRA to levy a special tax in their respective city. Under current statute, if this approval
were given, the County levy would automatically reduce any local levy for HRA act purposes.
This requirement is not applicable to the 43 other cities in Hennepin County. Currently, 28 of
the 47 cities in Hennepin County have formed local HRAs. Attached is detailed background
information prepared by the County on this matter.
Apparently, at the time Hennepin County requested authorization by the state to enact an HRA
levy (early 1970’s), only the four cities noted above had active HRAs. Thus, the statute was
specifically written to require that these four cities approve any enactment of a County HRA
levy.
City staff has not found any substantive reason to oppose the legislative initiative being made by
the County. However, we do have a concern that given the climate at the legislature this year,
the state legislature could take this matter in a direction not favorable to the City of St. Louis
Park, including the possibility of limiting our own ability to undertake an HRA levy. We have
shared this concern with Hennepin County and they have agreed to pull the legislation if it
appears that the direction of the legislation is going in a manner which is not in keeping with its
original intent.
Attached is a resolution Hennepin County has requested the City Council adopt supporting the
legislation noted above. As you will note in the last paragraph, it states that if any amendments
are proposed to be made to the County’s legislation that would negatively affect St. Louis Park,
they would strenuously oppose the changes up to and including withdrawal of the proposed
legislation. The resolution also clarifies that if this legislation were approved, it would in no way
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8b - Hennepin County HRA Levy
Page 2 of 4
prohibit the City from undertaking its own HRA levy or prohibit the City from its current
authority to disallow the County HRA from undertaking activities in St. Louis Park.
Steve Bubul, the EDA’s legal counsel, has been also asked to look at the proposed legislation to
insure our interests are protected. Staff will report on his findings at the Council meeting.
It is staff’s understanding the City of Minneapolis will act on the resolution on January 31.
Hopkins and Robbinsdale are scheduled to consider the resolution on February 4.
Attachments:
• Resolution
• Background information from Hennepin County
Prepared By:
Tom Harmening, Community Development Director
Approved By:
Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
2319:N
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8b - Hennepin County HRA Levy
Page 3 of 4
RESOLUTION NO. ____
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING SPECIAL LEGISLATION PROPOSED BY
HENNEPIN COUNTY AMENDING STATE STATUTE TO NOT REQUIRE
APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
A COUNTY HRA LEVY IN ST. LOUIS PARK
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HCHRA)
was created pursuant to special law MS 383B.77 (Laws 1987, c.177, Sec. 1) with all the powers
granted by the statewide “HRA Act” including the power to levy a special tax not to exceed
.0144% of taxable market value; and
WHEREAS, MS 383B.77 requires the HCRRA to notify communities annually of its
programs, and further requires that HCHRA must receive approval by resolution of the
governing body of a City before it can undertake any project; and
WHEREAS, MS 383B.77 also requires that cities with a housing and redevelopment
authority (HRA) in existence prior to June 8, 1971 must request annually that the HCHRA levy
the special tax in their city, in which case the County levy reduces any local levy for HRA Act
purposes; and
WHEREAS, this requirement affects only 4 of 28 municipal HRA’s in Hennepin County,
and therefore treats municipalities unequally by limiting the potential levy for HRA Act purposes
in some cities but not others; and
WHEREAS, the Hennepin County Board of Commissioners has approved seeking a
legislative change to MS 383B.77 to clarify the HCHRA’s levy authority by deleting this
requirement affecting only pre-1971 municipal HRA’s; and
WHEREAS, it is the position of the County that this legislative initiative be pursued only
in the event that the goal of clarifying the HCHRA’s levy authority is achieved, and that any
other amendments which would have a negative effect on either the HCHRA or municipal
HRA’s would be strenuously opposed including withdrawal of the proposed legislation.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park
goes on record in support of the proposed changes to MS 383B.77 insofar as the HCHRA’s levy
authority will in no way reduce, restrict or otherwise infringe on the HRA levy authority and
capacity of the City of St. Louis Park, and insofar as the City of St. Louis Park retains the
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8b - Hennepin County HRA Levy
Page 4 of 4
authority to not allow proposed HCHRA activities within the City in the event that the interests
of the County and the City of St. Louis Park are in conflict.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City of St. Louis Park requests that staff be kept
informed by Hennepin County of the status of legislative deliberations on this matter.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 3, 2003
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
N: res/Henn Co levy
8c. Police Sergeant Contract Changes for 1/1/03 – 12/31/03
A 1-year agreement for Sergeants was reached settling the City and Union for 2003.
Recommended
Action:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached
resolution approving a Labor Agreement between the City and
Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) #218, establishing
terms and conditions of employment for one year: 1/1/03 –
12/31/03.
Background:
Chief Luse and I met with the Sergeants one time to discuss their 2003 proposal. Their request
was very reasonable, asking for 3% on wages, $40/mo. on benefit contribution and $50/year
increase in clothing allowance for those assigned to Support Services Sergeant. Their request is
consistent with other groups for wages and insurance for 2003. The increase in clothing
allowance will bring them up to the same level as patrol.
The other changes to the contract are to clean up language. As you may remember, in 2002 the
Sergeants transitioned from the sick and vacation program to flex leave. Now that we are fully
into flex leave with our Sergeants, we need to delete language in the area of sick, vacation,
funeral leave and holidays that are no longer in effect.
Listed below are the changes to the proposed contract. The proposed contract is on file with the
City Clerk. More detail is available upon request.
Summary of Contract Changes
1. Duration: 1 year - 1/1/03 through 12/31/03.
2. Recognition: Change the statute for exclusive representative to 179A.03 Subd. 8
3. Article 12 Insurance: Increase employer contribution from $610/mo. to $650/mo.
retroactive to 1/1/03.
Comment: Increase of $40/mo. is consistent with our other employee groups.
4. Article 13 Uniforms: Increase clothing allowance for those employees who are assigned to
serve as Support Services Sergeant from $550/yr to $600/yr.
Comment: $600 per year is the same amount approved for Police Officers.
5. Article 26 Wages: 3% increase to wage schedule effective 1/1/03.
Comment: 3% wage increase is consistent with our other employee groups.
6. Other clean up:
Due to incorporation of flex leave, the following sections will be deleted since they are no
longer in effect.
• Remove the terms vacation and sick from 14.1 Injury on Duty
• Delete Article 15 – Vacation (replaced with flex leave)
• Delete 16.1 under Holidays (2 personal holidays eliminated with flex leave)
• Delete Article 17 Sick Leave (replaced with flex leave)
• Delete Article 18 Severance (replaced with flex leave)
• Delete 1st paragraph in Article 20 under Funeral Leave (no longer have Funeral Leave)
General comments: If the Council approves the Sergeants contract for 2003, we will have only
one contract remaining open which is Firefighters. We continue to negotiate with our firefighters
for a one year (2003) and hope to have that for you in the near future. If we settle firefighters for
one year – all contracts will be open in 2004.
Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution
approving a Labor Agreement between the City and Law Enforcement Labor Services #218,
Police Sergeants, establishing terms and conditions of employment for the duration of 1/1/03 –
1/31/023
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Nancy Gohman, Human Resources Director
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
RESOLUTION NO. 03-
RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR AGREEMENT
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
AND
LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC. LOCAL #218
POLICE SERGEANTS
JANUARY 1, 2003–DECEMBER 31, 2003
WHEREAS, the City and the Union have reached a negotiated settlement covering the
terms and conditions of a Labor Agreement as permitted by the State of Minnesota Public
Employees Labor Relations Act, and
WHEREAS, the City Council may enter into such agreements as authorized by its
Charter; now therefore,
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the Mayor and
City Manager are authorized to execute a Collective Bargaining Agreement, City Contract #
between the City of St. Louis Park and Law Enforcement Labor Services Inc. (LELS) Local #218
Police Sergeants effective January 1, 2003 – December 31, 2003.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 3 2003
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8d - 2003 Liquor License Renewals
Page 1 of 2
8d. Approval of 2003 Liquor License Renewals
Request of Council to approve year 2003 liquor license renewals for on-sale, off-sale,
Sunday-sale, club and wine intoxicating liquor and off-sale and on-sale 3.2% malt liquor.
License year to run March 1, 2003 through February 28, 2004.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to approve renewal of licenses
Background:
Renewal applications, liquor liability insurance certificates and license fees have been received
from 34 of the City’s 35 establishments. Though all renewals have not yet been completed, staff
is presenting the first round of renewals to allow adequate time for processing the licenses.
Council will be presented with the remaining renewals at the next regular meeting.
City Ordinance requires property tax payments to be current prior to issuance of a liquor license
and all tax payments for establishments are current.
Enforcement Issues:
Only one establishment, the Holiday Inn, was cited for non-compliance during the past licensing
year (March 1, 2002 through February 28, 2003). An administrative penalty hearing is
scheduled for Friday, January 31st. The Police Department continues to provide education
services and other support to all of St. Louis Park’s liquor establishments and does not feel this
violation warrants withholding renewal of the license for this establishment.
Attachments: List of establishments presented for approval
Prepared by: Cynthia D. Reichert, City Clerk
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8d - 2003 Liquor License Renewals
Page 2 of 2
2003 LIQUOR LICENSE RENEWALS
FOR APPROVAL FEBRUARY 3, 2003
Establishment Name Store Manager Name Address Fee
Al's Al's Liquor Store Inc. 3912 Excelsior Blvd $ 7,500
Applebee's Neighborhood /Grill Bar Apple American Ltd Ptsp of MN 8332 Hwy 7 $ 7,700
Bennigan's #2415 Den-Way Inc. 6475 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
Bunny's Rackner Inc. 5916 Excelsior Blvd $ 7,700
Byerly's St. Louis Park Byerly's Inc. 3777 Park Ctr Blvd $ 2,750
Byerly's Wine & Spirits Byerly Beverages, Inc. 3785 Park Ctr Blvd $ 200
Chili's Southwest Grill & Bar Chili's of MN Inc. 5245 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
Chipotle Mexican Grill Chipotle Mexican Grill of Colorado, LLC 5480 Excelsior Blvd $ 2,750
Costco Wholesale #377 Costco Wholesale Corporation 5801 W 16th St $ 200
Doubletree Park Place Hotel DT Management Inc. 1500 Park Place Blvd $ 7,700
Fuddruckers Fuddruckers Inc 6445 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
Great Bottle of Wine Great Bottle of Wine, Inc. 3947 Excelsior Blvd $ 200
Holiday Inn CapStar BK Company LLC 9970 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
Jennings' Liquor Store Jennings Red Coach Inn Inc. 4631 Excelsior Blvd $ 200
Knollwood Liquor Knollwood Liquor Inc. 7924 State Hwy 7 $ 200
Minneapolis Golf Club Mpls Golf Club 2001 Flag Ave S $ 700
Olive Garden #1424 GMRI Inc. 5245 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
Park Tavern Lounge and Lanes Philips Investment Co. 3401 Louisiana Ave S $ 7,700
Rainbow Foods Rainbow Food Group, Inc. 8950 State Hwy 7 $ 50
Sam's Club #6318 Sam's West Inc. 3745 Louisiana Ave S $ 250
Santorini's B & A Inc. 9920 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
Shelly's Woodroast Brinda-Heilicher/St. Louis Pk Inc. 6501 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
St. Louis Park Liquors Nguyen, Lua T.K. 6316 Minnetonka Blvd $ 200
Super Valu/Cub Diamond lake 1994 L.L.C. 3620 Texas Ave S $ 50
Taste of India Taste of India/St. Louis Pk Inc. 5617 Wayzata Blvd $ 2,750
Texas-Tonka Liquors Texas-Tonka Liquors Inc. 8242 Minnetonka Blvd $ 200
TGI Friday's TGI Friday's of MN Inc. 5875 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
Thanhdo Restaurant Thanhdo Inc. 3005 Utah Ave S $ 2,750
Timber Lodge Steakhouse Timber Lodge Steakhouse Inc. 5500 Excelsior Blvd $ 7,700
Tom Thumb #103 Tom Thumb Food Markets, Inc. 8000 Minnetonka Blvd $ 50
Vescio's Italian Restaurant Vescio's of St. Louis Park, Inc. 4001 State Hwy 7 $ 2,750
VFW VFW 5632 5605 36th St W $ 850
Westwood Liquors FC Liquors 2 Inc. 2304 Louisiana Ave S $ 200
Yangtze River Rest. Yangtze Inc. 5625 Wayzata Blvd $ 7,700
$132,600
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8e - PPL Board of Managers Appointment
Page 1 of 2
8e. City of St. Louis Park’s Representation on the Board of Managers of Project for
Pride in Living’s Louisiana Court Limited Liability Company.
This report considers adoption of a Resolution to designate the City’s representative to
Project for Pride in Living’s (PPL) Louisiana Court’s Limited Liability Company
(LLC) Board of Managers.
Recommended
Action:
Motion to adopt a Resolution designating Council Member Sally
Velick as the City of St. Louis Park’s representative to the Board
of Managers of Project for Pride in Living’s Louisiana Court
Limited Liability Company..
Background:
Project for Pride in Living and the City of St. Louis Park share an agreement where a
Councilmember is appointed to act as the City’s representative to the Board of Managers of
Project for Pride in Living's Louisiana Court Limited Liability company. Former
Councilmember Ron Latz was the city’s representative to that board, and with his departure to
the state legislature a new appointment must be made.
At the City Council Study Session on January 21, 2003 the Council agreed that Council Member
Sally Velick would serve as the City’s representative to PPL’s LLC Board of Managers and a
resolution appointing her to that position is presented here for adoption.
Attachments: Resolution
Prepared by: Cynthia Reichert, City Clerk
Approved by: Charles W. Meyer, City Manager
St. Louis Park City Council Agenda
Item: 020303 - 8e - PPL Board of Managers Appointment
Page 2 of 2
RESOLUTION NO. 03-019
RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK’S
REPRESENTATIVE TO PROJECT FOR PRIDE IN LIVING’S LOUISIANA COURT
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY’S BOARD OF MANAGERS
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park, the St. Louis Park Housing Authority, and
Project for Pride in Living are undertaking the redevelopment of the Louisiana Court project.
WHEREAS, As stated in the executed Private Redevelopment Contract between and
among the City of St. Louis Park, the St. Louis Park Housing Authority and Project of Pride in
Living’s (PPL) Louisiana Court Limited Liability Company (LLC), the City is to select a
representative to the LLC’s Board of Managers.
WHEREAS, The City wishes to participate fully with a member of the City Council
designated to serve as that representative.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT: The City Council officially designates
Council Member Sally Velick as representative of the City of St. Louis Park to the Board of
Managers of the Project for Pride in Living’s Louisiana Court Limited Liability Company.
LET IT FURTHER BE RESOLVED THAT: Councilmember Velick will be performing
her duties as a member of the Board on behalf of the City of St. Louis Park and will be acting in
that capacity as a St. Louis Park Councilmember.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 3, 2003
City Manager Mayor
Attest:
City Clerk