HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017/02/01 - ADMIN - Minutes - Planning Commission - RegularOFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
FEBRUARY 1, 2017 – 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lynne Carper, Torrey Kanne,
Richard Person, Carl Robertson, Joe Tatalovich,
Ethan Rickert (youth member)
MEMBERS ABSENT: Claudia Johnston-Madison, Lisa Peilen
STAFF PRESENT: Jennifer Monson, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther
1. Call to Order – Roll Call
Vice Chair Robertson called the meeting to order.
2. Approval of Minutes of January 18, 2017
Commissioner Person made a motion to approve the minutes of January 18, 2017.
Commissioner Carper seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-
0.
3. Public Hearings
A. Preliminary and Final Plat and Preliminary and Final PUD
The Elmwood Redevelopment
Location: 5605 36th Street W.
Applicant: 36th Street LLC
Case Nos.: 16-47-S and 16-48-PUD
Jennifer Monson, Planner, presented the staff report. The applicant proposes to
demolish the existing building and construct a 6-story, mixed-use building with
85 residential units, 20% of which will be affordable at 60% area median income,
4,400 square feet of commercial space, and 196 parking stalls.
Ms. Monson discussed the preliminary and final plat. She noted that the applicant
has requested to vacate the alley that lies between the south property line and the
Burlington Coat Factory parcel. Staff supports vacating the northern eight feet of
the alley.
Ms. Monson presented the zoning analysis for the PUD request.
Official Minutes
Planning Commission
February 1, 2017
Page 2
Ms. Monson spoke about the traffic study. She said normally a study is not done
for a project of this size but due to the increase in density they wanted to see how
a development for ages 55 + compares to a market rate development. She said
the study found that in the afternoon peak, a 70-unit senior housing development
generates the same amount of traffic as a 50-unit market rate housing
development. Furthermore, the peak hour traffic generation is about the same as
the existing American Legion and commercial office space.
Ms. Monson discussed landscaping. She explained that the project does not meet
the number of tree and shrub plantings required by the city, so the plan provides
alternative landscaping measures in order to meet the landscaping ordinance.
These measures include outdoor fireplaces, pergola structures, outdoor space on
the roof and public art.
Ms. Monson discussed the Designed Outdoor Recreation Area (DORA). The
plan exceeds the City’s minimum 12% DORA requirements and provides
approximately 21.6% of the project.
Ms. Monson stated that a neighborhood meeting was held on November 29, 2016.
Concerns included parking and compliance with zoning code regarding building
façade. Comments were also expressed about height. Concerns were lessened
when it was determined that the proposed building was only 10 feet higher than
Hoigaard Village across the street.
Commissioner Carper asked if there would be a rain garden or underground
storage.
Ms. Monson said the site is under one acre so they are not required to do any on-
site stormwater retention. They are reducing the amount of impervious surface to
about 72%. She added that the applicant will be paying for a portion of the
Hoigaard Village pond which the city constructed.
Commissioner Carper commented on the shadow study. Ms. Monson explained
that the ordinance allows up to 50% of the building wall to be covered for up to
two hours a day between the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. for up to 60 days. The
applicant supplemented their original shadow study to show that it meets that
requirement. The Hoigaard Village Harmony Vista south building wall will never
be shadowed more than 50% during the hours of 9 a.m. and 3 p.m. by The
Elmwood building.
Commissioner Carper asked about pets, community garden, electric charging
stations and recycling of demolition materials.
Official Minutes
Planning Commission
February 1, 2017
Page 3
Commissioner Kanne spoke about alternative landscaping measures being used to
help meet the intent of the landscaping ordinance. She spoke about outdoor
structures aging, and being less desirable than trees.
Ms. Monson said the zoning ordinance requires one tree per unit which would be
85 trees for this site. She said there isn’t enough room for 85 trees with this
development. Staff looks at the cost of all components of DORA and amenities
to see if that is approximately the same as what they would be required to pay for
trees and planting. They found that it is similar. She said as regards aging of
pergolas, outdoor fireplaces, etc., they will have to keep up with the property
maintenance so it looks and remains functional for the life of the building.
Commissioner Tatalovich asked for more information about the alley.
Ms. Monson said there is currently an unused platted alley between the
Burlington site and the Elmwood site. The southern 8 feet of the alley is planted
with trees. The city supports vacating the northern half of the alley.
Don Kasbohm, 36th Street LLC, said the building will be marketed as a 55+
building. He noted that one person signing a lease for a unit must be 55+.
Dean Dovolis, DJR Architecture, spoke about the design and landscaping. He
said the building has the capacity for expansion of retail on street level.
Scott England, DJR Architecture, said the DORA is extensive. He said there is
some potential on the north side to do a small, narrow rain garden. He spoke
about south side DORA which could be available for residents to garden. He
spoke about recycling measures within the building. Mr. England said the
materials used for outdoor hardscape amenities will be very durable, long lasting
pre-conditioned aluminum. He said they will be recycling existing materials and
construction debris.
Commissioner Kanne said she thought some landscaping could be shorter,
flowering trees with width to try to get the tree number back up. Maybe there
could be less shrubs and more flowering trees.
Commissioner Kanne commented that many 55+ people are working and that
should be considered in the traffic study. She said many 55+ tenants may be
moving back to St. Louis Park to be closer to their children and grandchildren.
She asked if there were open places for grandparents to watch children during the
day. She said such open areas would be a selling point.
Mr. England replied that there are parks in the neighborhood. He spoke about the
hardscape areas of the DORA which includes grass, raised planters and some
trees.
Official Minutes
Planning Commission
February 1, 2017
Page 4
Mr. Dovolis spoke about the availability of SWLRT transit close by for the
development residents.
Commissioner Person and Mr. Kasbohm discussed the 60% area median income
and how it relates to the 55 + population.
Mr. England stated that electric stations for cars will be available.
Commissioner Robertson asked about flexibility to convert units to
condominiums.
Mr. England said the physical structure is set up in such a way that units could be
converted.
Mr. Kasbohm added that his intent is not to convert to condominiums. He said
he is a long-term holder of apartment buildings in good locations.
Commissioner Rickert and Mr. England spoke about the haul route for
construction materials.
Vice Chair Robertson opened the public hearing. He closed the public hearing as
no one was present wishing to speak.
Commissioner Carper stated he liked the project design. He commented on the
variety of landscaping, adding that more trees could be added as recommended.
He said he was very much in favor of the project.
Commissioner Kanne spoke about the emphasis on children and the elderly in the
city and she really likes that part of the proposal. She commented on the street
needing a facelift and she likes having new life and landscaping added to that
area. She said overall she finds that it is a really good project.
Vice Chair Robertson said the design and amenities are top notch. He said he
does have an issue with the project as the area is guided as Mixed Use in the
Comprehensive Plan. He said it isn’t really a mixed-use project. He said he
brought this up at the Commission study session. He said when he looks at the
designation of mixed-use this project is too short on commercial on the lower
level. He said it is a strong street and he’d like to keep the commercial strength of
it at the street level. He said he can’t get over that hurdle.
Mr. Dovolis said they designed the first floor to be flexible so that as the street
evolves more commercial intensive the building could adapt with it. It is sized for
the present situation. But over time the commercial mixed-use could be
strengthened.
Official Minutes
Planning Commission
February 1, 2017
Page 5
Vice Chair Robertson said that is a step in the right direction but he’d prefer to see
the commercial aspect emphasized at this stage rather than later.
Mr. Kasbohm spoke about the difficulty of the commercial market, including
commercial at Hoigaard Village and Excelsior & Grand. He said he believes in
the location and creating a destination.
Commissioner Carper made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary
and final plat. Commissioner Kanne seconded the motion, and the motion passed
on a vote of 5-0.
Commissioner Carper made a motion to recommend approval of the preliminary
and final planned unit development. Commissioner Person seconded the motion,
and the motion passed on a vote of 4-1 (Robertson opposed).
B. Zoning Text Amendment
Dwelling Units as Accessory Use to Religious Institutions
Applicant: Tracy Schultz, Thai Buddhist Center of Minnesota
Case No.: 17-01-ZA
Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator, presented the staff report. He
explained that the applicant purchased the former church property at 2544 State
Highway 100. The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Zoning
Ordinance to allow up to 15 people to live at a religious institution in the R-1
Single-Family Residence Zoning District. Mr. Morrison noted that if the zoning
code is amended, staff has recommended the regulations apply to all residential
zoning districts.
Mr. Morrison reviewed the applicant’s intent to renovate the building into a Thai
Buddhist Temple that will serve as a place of worship and meditation. He
explained the tradition to have monks living at the temple for varying lengths of
time. He reviewed zoning regulations for R-1 Single Family Residential District.
He reviewed current conditions for religious institutions in Residence Districts by
Conditional Use Permit. He reviewed proposed provisions for accessory dwelling
units or living quarters affiliated with a Religious Institution.
Commissioner Robertson asked how the 15 person cap was determined,
commenting that certain properties were large enough to accommodate more than
15.
Mr. Morrison responded there is a little bit of flexibility in that number. The
applicant is requesting up to 15. When staff calculates the density for this
Official Minutes
Planning Commission
February 1, 2017
Page 6
property it is just over 15 dwelling units. Looking at potential uses in the future
staff is comfortable with this number.
Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Administrator, added that this is relatively
new for the city. He said the cap of 15 people seems appropriate. The principal
use of the property should remain the religious institution, and the dwelling units
remain an accessory use. Allowing too many people could change that balance.
Commissioner Carper asked about other religious institutions in St. Louis Park
that have clergy living on site.
Mr. Morrison spoke about two parishes with clergy living on site. He also
mentioned the Yeshiva of Mpls. boy’s high school and dormitory.
Tracy Schultz, applicant, and Yin Srichoochat board director Wat Thai of
Minnesota, introduced themselves.
Commissioner Person asked if the average occupancy would be less than 15.
Ms. Srichoochat said normally there are about five monks living on site.
Vice Chair Robertson opened the public hearing.
Sharon Lehrman, 2610 Vernon Ave. S., said she is thrilled to welcome their new
neighbors. She asked about any new structures on the site to house monks.
Mr. Morrison said if the zoning text amendment is adopted the applicant will be
submitting a conditional use permit. Detailed drawings would be available at that
time. He said he understood plans were currently being drawn up and would be
presented at a neighborhood meeting.
Ms. Schultz said currently there are no plans to build an accessory structure. She
discussed the community garden and said it is their intention to work with the
neighborhood to retain some of that.
Amy McTavish, 2624 Yosemite Ave. S., said the garden plots were plowed away
last year.
Mr. Walther stated that the city’s Natural Resources Coordinator, Jim Vaughan,
will coordinate with the new owners on replacing the garden plots.
Vice Chair Robertson closed the public hearing. He said the proposal works very
well and strengthens the neighborhood.
Official Minutes
Planning Commission
February 1, 2017
Page 7
Commissioner Person spoke about the interior of the building. He said he is very
much in favor of the proposal.
Commissioner Kanne said that she is very pleased with the proposal.
Commissioner Person made a motion to recommend approval of the zoning
ordinance amendment pertaining to Religious Institutions. Commissioner Kanne
seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 5-0.
4. Other Business: None
5. Communications
Mr. Walther reminded commissioners about the February 27 Boards and
Commissions annual meeting.
Mr. Walther spoke about the Vision 3.0 process. He provided information about
the upcoming Facilitator Training and the first Town Hall meeting.
6. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
STUDY SESSION NOTES
Commissioners Present: Carl Robertson, Lynne Carper, Torrey Kanne,
Joe Tatalovich, Ethan Rickert
Staff Present: Sean Walther, Jack Sullivan, Jennifer Monson
Others Present: Heather Kienitz, SEH
PLACE Project Team: Chris Velasco, Stuart Krahn, Alex Monarez,
Elizabeth Bowling, Alice Hiniker
Traffic Study Review (Jack Sullivan)
Traffic Study
Jack Sullivan reviewed the traffic studies that have been completed for W 36th Street and
Wooddale Avenue. Mr. Sullivan presented four options that were identified to remedy
any traffic concerns in the area. The best option to fix traffic issues in the area is to widen
the Wooddale Ave bridge over Hwy 7 to better accommodate pedestrians and bicycles.
The bridge widening project will be completed as part of the SWLRT project, and
signalized intersections at the on and off ramps will be installed.
Official Minutes
Planning Commission
February 1, 2017
Page 8
A discussion of Level of Service (LOS) occurred. The city’s policy is to maintain an
overall LOS Level D. The PLACE development provides LOS D on opening day 2020,
and continues to operate at LOS D in 2030 and 2040.
A summary of the evolution of PLACE’s site plan was presented. The original project
was all located on the north side of the SWLRT line and the traffic numbers did not work.
The current proposal splits the site north and south of the SWLRT line, and the project
maintains an acceptable LOS.
Mobility Plan Review
Chris Velasco representing PLACE presented the non-profit’s mission of creating great
places and transforming communities, and how they plan to accomplish that mission in
St. Louis Park by providing a transit oriented development. The goal is to have people
live and work on site so they do not have to rely on vehicle, but can use alternate
transportation. The mobility plan includes car free living, on site job opportunities, car
shares, bike shares, a stipend for car free living, and a local shuttle service until LRT
opens.
A discussion occurred on the normal factors a traffic study takes into consideration.
Heather mentioned the traffic study did account for proximity to transit and shared uses,
but did not include discounts for the additional mobility plan elements. These mobility
plan elements reduce the traffic impact PLACE has on area traffic.
Parking Study
PLACE is providing significantly less parking than is normally required for development
in St. Louis Park. Discussions included a summary of parking analysis done by city staff
and an independent parking analysis completed by Walker Parking Consultants. St. Louis
Park’s standard parking requirements do not allow for discounts for proximity to a highly
reliable transit system like LRT. The city staff and consulting firm analysis show that
adequate parking is being provided by PLACE. However, since this is a large change in
what is normally required in the city, a proof of parking plan will be required.
The city will need to manage/regulate parking around LRT stations regardless of PLACE.
The study session was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Nancy Sells
Recording Secretary