HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018/02/05 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
FEBRUARY 5, 2018
6:00 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room
Discussion Item
1. 6:00 p.m. 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed
Representatives
Written Reports
2. Blake Road – St. Louis Park/Hopkins Detachment/Annexation
7:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Council Chambers
1.Call to Order
2.Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes January 2, 2018
4. Approval of Agenda
5.Reports
5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements
6.Old Business – None
7.New Business
7a. Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development
Associates LLC
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution approving the Preliminary
Development Agreement between the EDA, the City, and Sherman Associates LLC.
8.Communications – None
9.Adjournment
7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers
1. Call to Order
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2.Presentations
2a. Recognition of Donations
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Study Session Meeting Minutes of January 8, 2018
3b. City Council Meeting Minutes January 16, 2018
3c. Special Study Session Meeting Minutes January 16, 2018
Meeting of February 5, 2018
City Council Agenda
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need
no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember
or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for
discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading
of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move
items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
5. Boards and Commissions
5a. Approve Appointment of Youth Representative to Environment & Sustainability
Commission
Recommended Action: Motion to appoint Katherine Christiansen to the Environment
and Sustainability Commission for the current term ending August 31, 2018.
5b. Approve Appointment of Youth Representative to Parks & Recreation Advisory
Commission
Recommended Action: Motion to appoint Rachel Salzer to the Parks & Recreation
Advisory Commission for the current term ending August 31, 2018.
6. Public Hearings
6a. 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
Recommended Action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close
the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution accepting the project report, establishing
the 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000), approving plans and
specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items
8a. Climate Action Plan
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Climate Action Plan
for the City of St. Louis Park.
8b. Construction of Fastpitch Fields at Aquila Park
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution establishing and approving plans
and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids for fastpitch fields at Aquila Park.
8c. Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, the City and Sherman
Development Associates LLC
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary
Development Agreement between the EDA, the City, and Sherman Associates.
8d. Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign
Finance Contributions
Recommended Action: Motion to Adopt Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Home
Rule Charter Sec. 12.04 related to Campaign Finance Contributions. A unanimous vote
of all 7 councilmembers is required for approval.
9. Communications – None
Meeting of February 5, 2018
City Council Agenda
CONSENT CALENDAR
4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of December 23, through
January 26, 2018.
4b. Adopt Resolution for a Limited Use Permit with the Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MnDOT) for a pedestrian trail and bikeway within the Right-of-Way of
Highway 7 along Wooddale Avenue.
4c. Approve a contract with Hennepin County Healthcare System that amends the original
medical direction contract related to dispensing Nalaxone and or other lifesaving
interventions by St. Louis Park Fire Department EMT’s.
4d. Adopt Resolution approving a Minor Amendment to the approved Planned Unit
Development.
4e. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from Brian and Sidonia
Johnson in the amount of $732.50, Patrick and Melanie Padden in the amount of $732.50
and Richard and Jill Johnson in the amount of $735 to be used at Westwood Hills Nature
Center for a bench in honor of their father and father-in-law, Dick Johnson’s 90th
birthday.
4f. Adopt the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of St. Louis Park
and the City of Edina.
4g. Adopt Resolution authorizing removal of parking restrictions on the east side of
Wooddale Avenue from 100 feet to 140 feet south of W. 40th Street.
4h. Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of parking restrictions on the north side of
Excelsior Boulevard between Kipling Avenue and 36 ½ Street.
4i. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from the Jewish
Community Relations Council to allow three police department staff to attend their
annual educational trip to the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC on April 24th, 2018.
4j. Adopt Resolution revising Resolution 17-196 limiting the number of off-sale intoxicating
liquor licenses issued in St. Louis Park.
4k. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of June
7, 2017.
4l. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of
August 23, 2017.
4m. Approve for filing Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of
October 2, 2017.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel
17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at
www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board
in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by
noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the
Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting: Special Study Session
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Discussion Item: 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed
Representatives
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Attached is the list of legislative priorities and issues for
Council’s annual review and discussion at the study session with Senator Ron Latz, Representative
Cheryl Youakim, Representative Peggy Flanagan, Hennepin County Commissioner Marion
Greene, and Metropolitan Council representative Gail Dorfman.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The attached documents reflect the legislative policies and
priorities the Council reviewed and discussed in preparation for the meeting with our elected and
appointed representatives.
SUMMARY: Based on the Council’s study session discussions on January 8th and January 29th,
Staff has prepared the attached list of legislative priorities and issues for the discussion with our
legislators and representatives. As has been the case in previous years, as the 2018 legislative
session progresses, additional issues may come to light.
It has been our practice to retain lobbying services to help us with legislative and regulatory issues.
Administrative Services has utilized the legislative services of Doug Franzen and Vic Moore,
Franzen & Associates, and Dennis McGrann and Emily Tranter of Lockridge, Grindal, and Nauen.
Unless staff hears otherwise, we will continue to use these services in 2018. Note that Vic Moore
and Emily Tranter will be attending the study session.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Funding for our lobbyists is included in the
budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues
Prepared by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
City of St. Louis Park
Top 2018 Legislative Priorities
There are thirty issues identified in the attached 2018 Legislative Issues and Priorities document
broken out into four subject areas. Of all of the issues identified, what follows are the highest
priorities of the City Council:
Community Development/Housing (pages 3 – 4)
The issue of affordable housing is of significant importance to the City Council and is a clear
reflection of the concerns of the community. In the attached document, starting on the first page,
is a menu of seven different measures the City Council feels should be pursued as follows:
•Bonding Authority (Request directed to State Legislature)
•Establish a TOD Affordable Housing Fund (Request directed to State Leg./Hennepin Co)
•Local Housing Trust Funds (Request directed to State Legislature)
•Reduce 4D Tax Classification Tax Rate and Expand Eligibility to Participation in the
Housing Choice Voucher Program (Request directed to State Legislature)
•Amend State Statute 471.9996 Rent Control Prohibited to Allow for a 90 Day Tenant
Protection Period Following the Transfer of (NOAH) Property Ownership (Request
directed to State Legislature)
•Establish revenue resource for Inclusionary Housing Fund (Request directed to State
Legislature)
•Affordable Housing – Not limiting Local Authority (Request directed to State Legislature)
Transportation (pages 6-9)
•The Redesign and Reconstruction of CSAH 25 by Hennepin County (Request directed to
Hennepin County)
•Funding from Hennepin County for the rehabilitation/reconstruction of the portion of
Minnetonka Blvd between TH 100 and TH 169 (Request directed to Hennepin County)
•Partnership between Hennepin County and the City on the complete reconstruction of the
Minnetonka Blvd/Texas Ave. intersection in 2020. (Request directed to Hennepin County)
•SWLRT (Request directed to Hennepin County and Met Council)
•Transportation and Transit Financing (Request directed to State Legislature)
Public Safety (page 10)
•Not only maintain but increase funding for the Police Trainee/Non-traditional Pathway to
Policing Program (Request directed to State Legislature)
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
City of St. Louis Park
2018 Legislative Issues
Community Development Issues
Affordable Housing Financing
Bonding Authority (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: In the 2017 legislative session, the legislature provided $77 million in bonding authority to
construct and preserve affordable housing, improve existing public housing and to expand support
for homeless programs. Although the 2017 bonding authority amount is significant, the continued
demand for affordable housing warrants the need for additional Housing Infrastructure (HIB) and
General Obligation (GO) Bonds for affordable housing. GO bonds can be used to rehabilitate or
construct new public housing. HIB bonds can be used to finance several types of projects including
new construction or rehabilitation of supportive and affordable housing and preservation of
existing federally subsidized rental housing.
Position: The city supports an effective bonding bill that provides Housing Infrastructure (HIB)
and General Obligation (GO) Bonds to fund affordable housing to serve low income households.
Establish a TOD Affordable Housing Fund (Request directed to State Leg./Hennepin Co)
Issue: Efforts are being made to develop a corridor-wide housing strategy for the SWLRT Corridor
for providing a full range of housing options specifically within a half-mile of the station areas. The
fundamental issue with respect to the traditional approaches to infill/redevelopment and mixed-
income housing production/preservation, is an absence of funds.
Position: The city supports the creation of a TOD Affordable Housing Fund and requests that
Hennepin County and the State provide a financial resource to be used to support the preservation
and creation of affordable housing along the SWLRT corridor.
Local Housing Trust Funds (LHTF) (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: In the 2017 session, the legislature passed language that enables cities, counties or regions
to set up and resource LHTFs. In 2018, local affordable housing agencies will be working to
identify a consistent funding source and incentivize communities to take advantage of this locally
controlled tool.
Position: The city supports legislation that establishes a dedicated revenue source for LHTFs,
encourages local jurisdictions, creates a state match and provides technical assistance dollars to
communities to set up their LHTF.
Reduce 4D Tax Classification Tax Rate and Expand Eligibility to Participation in the
Housing Choice Voucher Program (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: Increasing property taxes are impacting multi-family residential rental properties. These
increasing costs are being passed on to renters as owners increase rents. At the same time, the need
for affordable housing continues to increase. Existing rent-restricted buildings are also struggling
with increased taxes and limited ability to increase rents to cover the cost. Reducing the 4D tax
classification rate would provide an incentive for market-rate properties to designate a portion of
their units as rent-restricted and provide tax relief to existing rent-restricted properties. Expanding
eligibility to include properties committing to accepting a minimum (20%) number of Housing
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 4
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Choice Voucher participants would provide an incentive for more rental owners to accept tenants
receiving housing subsidy, which provides greater housing opportunities for program participants.
Position: The city supports any legislation that would reduce the 4D tax classification rate to
encourage more rent-restricted units in market-rate buildings and/or expand eligibility requirements
to encourage more rental owner participation in the Housing Choice Voucher Program.
Amend State Statute 471.9996 Rent Control Prohibited to Allow for a 90 Day Tenant
Protection Period Following the Transfer of (NOAH) Property Ownership (Request directed
to State Legislature)
Issue: Currently state statute prohibits any local adoption of an ordinance to control rents on private
residential properties unless the ordinance is approved in a general election. Investment buyers
have been purchasing NOAH multi-family residential properties, rehabbing properties and
increasing rents. In some cases, new owners have non-renewed the leases of existing tenants with
minimal notice and/or implemented substantial rent increases with minimal notice. A 90-day
period that would prohibit rent increases and non-renewals would allow time for existing residents
in these situations to seek alternative housing.
Position: The city supports legislation that would allow for a 90-day tenant protection period
following ownership transfer of a NOAH multi-family residential property.
Establish revenue resource for Inclusionary Housing Fund (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: The Met Council partnered with the Family Housing Fund and the Urban Land Institute of
MN to support mixed-income (inclusionary) housing efforts in the region. Together they
developed a number of tools including the mixed-income calculator and the establishment of an
Inclusionary Housing Fund to assist in financing mixed income projects. A number of
communities in the metro region have adopted policies to ensure the inclusion of affordable
housing in new multi-family residential market-rate developments. To date, a funding source for
the Inclusionary Housing Fund has not been established.
Position: The City supports establishment of a financing resource to fund the Inclusionary
Housing Fund to facilitate mixed-income projects. An Inclusionary Housing Fund would support
local efforts to finance inclusionary housing projects, providing a financial resource for local
communities that adopt Inclusionary housing policies for new multi-family residential development.
Affordable Housing - Limiting Local Authority (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: Recent discussions on affordable housing solutions includes agencies advocating for
housing programs for primarily multiple family developments, and local home builders pursuing
reduced regulatory authority by the state and cities. Last year the Builders Association of the Twin
Cities had worked toward a bill that was defeated which would essentially require new codes to
receive legislative approval before being adopted. This year the Builders Association of the Twin
Cities acting through an organization called Housing First MN will be advancing the interests of
the construction industry. The Builder Association and this organization are advocating for lesser
code standards for affordable housing projects in order to reduce building costs.
Position: Although St. Louis Park strongly supports and encourages affordable housing, minimum
code requirements for energy conservation and building safety should not be compromised on the
concept of reducing construction costs to builders. In addition, local land use and zoning standards
for establishing quality of life standards in each community should not be limited by legislative
action.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 5
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Other Community Development Issues
TIF District Statutory Modifications (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: Tax Increment Financing (TIF) remains the most viable tool for local economic
development and community reinvestment efforts. TIF is a method local governments use to pay
for the costs of qualifying improvements necessary to create new investment, redevelopment, or
publicly-assisted housing. The financing of the qualifying improvements is paid from the increased
property taxes generated from the new development, redevelopment, or housing that would not
occur “but for” such assistance. There are steps that the State could take that would enhance the
effectiveness of TIF, leverage additional private investment and create more jobs and tax base in
communities. The current types of State-authorized TIF districts lack flexibility and do not
adequately address the varied and unique redevelopment situations found in urban communities.
Currently, the Minnesota TIF Act requires more than 50% of the buildings in a project area be
found to be substandard to qualify as a Redevelopment TIF District. In redevelopment situations
involving only a small number of parcels, this can be an insurmountable standard to meet thus
preventing new investment from occurring.
Position: The City supports greater flexibility and the inclusion of additional uses within current
TIF districts.
• In particular, the City supports a minor modification of the Redevelopment TIF District
statute requiring 50% or more of buildings within project areas be found to be substandard.
• The City supports the elimination of the 5-year rule for districts that take longer to develop.
• To spur additional development, the City supports lengthening the duration of Economic
Development TIF Districts to a full 10 years, or nine years from first tax increment collection.
In addition, the City supports expanding authority to allow for the establishment of Economic
Development TIF Districts for assisting with commercial project development for the
purpose of retention and expansion of existing businesses and the attraction of new business
to the state to create and retain jobs.
• The City further supports the establishment of Transit Oriented TIF Districts within one-half
mile of light rail corridors and one mile from light rail corridor train stations for the purposes
of promoting economic development, redeveloping blighted areas, and the development of
housing near light rail corridors. Eligible expenditures within the district include but are not
limited to (1) the city's or authority’s share of the costs necessary to provide for the
construction of any southwest light rail transit station and related infrastructure, including
but not limited to parking facilities, including structured parking, pedestrian overpasses,
pedestrian connections, and walkways or trails; (2) infrastructure and roadway
improvements, including but not limited to sanitary sewer, water, storm sewer and utility
improvements; (3) land acquisition costs; (4) costs related to environmental remediation, soil
correction, demolition, and relocation; (5) site improvement costs; (6) costs incurred with
respect to the development of or rehabilitation of housing; and (7) related administrative
costs. Additionally, if two or more cities or authorities propose a joint development or
adjacent developments, the cities or authorities would be allowed to expend up to 25% of the
total revenue derived from tax increments generated from such a tax increment district to pay
for the eligible expenditures of another tax increment district located outside the city’s
corporate limits
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 6
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
DEED Program Funding (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: The Department of Employment & Economic Development (DEED) is critically important
in the support of communities and local economic development initiatives. DEED manages several
programs utilized by the City which have positively impacted St. Louis Park.
Position: St. Louis Park supports the continued annual funding of DEED programs at stable and
sustainable levels. The City believes that continued funding of DEED programs at the same, or an
increased level is vital to economic growth across Minnesota. The City supports legislative
initiatives that strengthen funding levels for economic development programs administered by
DEED and other state agencies such as Small Business Development Centers, the Minnesota
Investment Fund, the Job Creation Fund, Brownfield Cleanup and Redevelopment Grant Program,
Transportation Economic Development Program and proposed new financing tools that support
development along transit corridors. Minnesota communities rely on these programs to remain
competitive with neighboring states in their efforts to bring jobs and tax base back to Minnesota.
Special Service Districts Statutory Authority (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: In 1988, cities were granted general authority under Minn. Stat. § 428A.01 to § 428A.101
to establish Special Service Districts. As currently written, only commercial properties can
financially participate within Special Service Districts. This is challenging for funding additional
services within mixed-use project areas. The City of St. Louis Park has established six Special
Service Districts, including multiple sections of Excelsior Boulevard. Providing infrastructure
improvements and on-going maintenance at the LRT station areas will also be a need
Position: The city supports the inclusion of multi-family housing developments as financial
participants within Special Service Districts and the establishment of Special Service Districts
around transit and LRT station areas.
Transportation Issues
Redesign and Reconstruction of CSAH 25 (Request directed to Hennepin County)
Issue: The City and County are working together to prepare a long term vision to transform the
CSAH 25 Corridor from the rural design through-route it is today to a multimodal urban boulevard
with well-designed landscape architecture and place-making features. The goal is to transform this
Hennepin County Road into an amenity rich, pedestrian and transit oriented, development friendly
Boulevard, between Trunk Highway 100 and France Avenue. A clear long-term vision for CSAH
25 will serve as a guide for both public and private investment in this corridor. Already, the
SWLRT Beltline station, park & ride and proposed Beltline Blvd Station redevelopment project is
beginning to transform the west end of this corridor. The Shoreham mixed-use project is beginning
transformation at the east end and the Parkway 25 project will continue the redevelopment pattern.
The new concept for CSAH 25, when finalized, will support this change to a more urban place and
provide good, attractive access to the Beltline LRT station in St. Louis Park and the neighboring
W. Lake LRT station in Minneapolis.
Analysis: To transform CSAH 25 into an urban boulevard will require the following actions and
considerations:
• A commitment from Hennepin County, with involvement from Minneapolis, to changing
the vision for the corridor.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 7
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
• Integration into concept plans of both the planned improvements associated with SWLRT
between Beltline Boulevard and Lynn Avenue and the West Lake Street multi-modal
transportation plan into the vision for the corridor.
• Inclusion in concept plans of strong connections to existing and planned bicycle routes,
filling the existing gap in access to the Cedar Lake Trail from the north.
• Consideration in concept plans of the MCES interceptor along the south side, the lack of
width on north-south streets, the frontage roadway geometry, circulation/access needs,
future land use assumptions, rail/LRT, Beltline Station area plan and design guidelines.
• Addressing storm water treatment, landscape and pedestrians amenities as well as
opportunities for remnant right-of-way to be used for future additional bike and pedestrian
facilities.
• Consideration of the east end “triangle,” where Minnetonka Blvd, CSAH 25, France Avenue
and West Lake Street meet. This area presents both opportunities for gateway treatments
for both Minneapolis and St Louis Park as well as operational challenges for the movement
of traffic, pedestrians, bicyclists and local businesses.
• Analysis of traffic operations analysis, crash/safety, 2040 forecasts (possibly interim year
related to SWLRT improvements), including review of all pedestrian- or bicycle-related
crashes. Limits of operations analysis should be the Hwy. 100 west ramp terminal to France
Avenue.
• Inclusion of multimodal improvements, future intersection locations, and lane arrangement
and circulation.
• Consideration of a new name for the roadway that provides a positive identity while
eliminating the currently existing address confusion. Just as CSAH 5 is also named
Minnetonka Boulevard, CSAH 25 needs a street name around which an image and identity
can be built. In the case of CSAH 25, there is added confusion because of its history of being
originally part of MN Highway 7, a name that continues to be used by many.
• CSAH 25 serves many important functions and is home to a surprising number of
businesses, residents and property owners. All stakeholders should be informed and
involved in the design processes from the beginning.
• Development of a funding and phasing plan will be necessary. Transforming CSAH 25 will
be a large project and will take time and significant resources to implement. New
development in the corridor may be able to play a significant role in funding the
transformation, but timing will be critical for that to happen.
Position: We thank Hennepin County for their participation in the redesign process and request
the County’s support and funding for the actual rehabilitation/ reconstruction of CSAH 25 as the
project moves forward.
Rehabilitation/ Reconstruction of Minnetonka Blvd. (Request directed to Hennepin Co.)
Issue: Minnetonka Boulevard between Trunk Highway (TH) 169 and France Avenue is a
Hennepin County road and is one of the few continuous west-to-east roadway connections in the
City of St. Louis Park. The Minnetonka Boulevard bridge over TH 100 was reconstructed in 2015
and includes bicycle, pedestrian and intersection improvements that have greatly increased the
efficiency and safety in this segment of the corridor. The road to the west and to the east of the
new bridge is in need of rehabilitation reconstruction to ensure that it accommodates the best
facility for bicycles, pedestrians and motorists.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 8
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Recently, the city was informed that the portion of Minnetonka Blvd. between France Ave. and
Hwy 100 has been placed in the County’s CIP for reconstruction in 2022 at an estimated cost of
$14 million.
Analysis: In order to extend the bicycle, pedestrian and roadway enhancements that were
completed at the Minnetonka Boulevard bridge the following items would need to be addressed
for the entire corridor.
• Curb height: Between TH 169 and France Avenue the road is concrete with a bituminous
overlay. While the overlay improves the ride for motorists, it also reduced the curb height
which places the roadway at nearly the same level as the sidewalk in various locations along
the corridor
• Sidewalks/Landscaping: The sidewalks require updating to meet ADA requirements for
pedestrian ramps, width, and clearance from obstructions. To increase safety and provide a
more pedestrian-friendly environment the city would like the County to move the sidewalks
away from the street and plant trees in the boulevard.
• Pedestrian crosswalks: A number of pedestrian crossings should be considered for
enhancements. The addition of pedestrian refuge median or bump outs should be considered
to make the crossings safer on this four-lane road
• Bike lanes: The city and county bike plan include bike lanes on this road which could be
accomplished by creating a three-lane cross section for the corridor since currently a number
of segments are not wide enough to accommodate bike lanes.
• Intersection modifications: Signal systems and intersection geometrics in the corridor should
be studied and updated to include flashing yellow arrows and turn lanes as needed to improve
traffic flow (see below re: the intersection of Texas Ave an Minnetonka Blvd).
Position: The city sincerely thanks Hennepin County for including in its CIP the reconstruction of
Minnetonka Blvd from France Ave to Hwy 100 in 2022. The city requests that the portion of
Minnetonka Blvd between Hwy 100 and TH 169 also be identified in the County’s capital plan for
reconstruction. In 2018, the City reconstructed Texas Avenue south of Minnetonka Boulevard,
stopping just 400 feet south of the Minnetonka Blvd intersection. This project was coordinated
with Centerpoint Energy as a part of a 24 inch distribution line replacement. Centerpoint has
indicated that they will be coming back in 2020 to continue this project through the Minnetonka
Blvd/ Texas Avenue intersection. In order to develop a comprehensive project that will address
intersection design concerns and pavement condition, the City has added the reconstruction of the
Texas/ Minnetonka Boulevard intersection to its CIP for 2020. In addition to the County making
improvements to the entire segment of Minnetonka Blvd west of Hwy 100 as noted above, the
City further requests that the County partner with the City and set aside funding for this much
needed intersection reconstruction in 2020.
Southwest LRT (Directed to State Legislature, Met Council & Hennepin County)
Position: The City continues to strongly support the Southwest LRT Project.
Transportation Funding (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: A comprehensive transportation system is a vital component in planning for and meeting
the physical, social and economic needs of our state and metropolitan region. Adequate and stable
sources of funding are necessary to ensure the development and maintenance of a high quality,
efficient and safe transportation system that meets these needs and that will position the state and
region to be economically competitive in the years ahead.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 9
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Analysis: Under current transportation financing structures, transportation needs in the
metropolitan region continue to be inadequate and underfunded. Our transportation funding system
relies primarily on local property taxes and fees and the motor vehicle sales tax (MVST) for transit.
Automobiles are becoming more fuel efficient and MVST receipts continue to lag behind
projections, resulting in funding levels that continually fail to meet demand. Transportation
funding and planning must be a high priority for state, regional and local policymakers so that the
transportation system can sufficiently meet the needs of the state’s residents and businesses and
its projected population growth. Funding and planning for our regional and statewide systems must
be coordinated at the federal, state, regional and local levels to optimally achieve long term needs
and goals. In addition, cities lack adequate tools and state resources for the maintenance and
improvement of municipal systems, with resources restricted to property taxes and special
assessments. Cost participation requirements have overburdened city budgets. It is imperative that
alternative revenue generating authority be granted to municipalities and state resources be made
available for this purpose to relieve the burden on the property tax system.
Position: The city:
• Supports stable and sufficient statewide transportation funding and local tools to meet the
long-term transportation system needs of the region and local municipal systems;
• Supports funding to assist cities overburdened by cost participation responsibilities;
• Supports state funding for state highway projects, including congestion and safety
improvements; and
• Supports state financial assistance, as well as innovations in design and construction.
Transit Financing (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: The Twin Cities metropolitan area is served by a regional transit system that is expanding
to include rail transit and dedicated busways. Any operating subsidies necessary to support this
system should come from a regional or statewide funding source. The property taxpayers of
individual cities and counties should not be required to fund the operation of specific transit lines
or routes of service within this regional system.
Analysis: MVST revenue projections have not been reliable and the Legislature has repeatedly
reduced general fund support for Metropolitan Transit. As a result, the regional transit providers
continue to operate at a funding deficit. Shifting demographics in the metropolitan region will
mean increased demand for transit in areas with and without current transit service.
Position: The city supports stable and growing revenue sources to fund the operating budget for
all regional transit providers at a level sufficient to meet the growing operational and capital transit
needs of the region and to expand the system to areas that currently have little or no transit options.
The city also supports an increase in the regional sales tax to fund the expansion of regular route
service, the continuing capital expenses and expanded operational needs of the metropolitan transit
system, if the increase is accompanied by sufficient local controls over the collection and
expenditure of the new revenue and geographic balance is maintained in the expansion of service
to allow cities to appropriately plan for growth in population and service needs along new and
expanded transit service. The city opposes diversions of the uses of this tax for any other purposes.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 10
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Public Safety Issues
Police Trainee/Non-traditional Pathway to Policing Program (Directed to State Legislature)
Issue: In recent years the candidate pool for police officers in Minnesota has been shrinking in
numbers and narrowing in the representation of candidate diversity using several descriptors
including race and ethnicity, age and life experience, and academic and career development in
other disciplines. During the 2017 legislative session $400,000 was appropriated for communities
participating in this new program on a 50/50 cost split. Thus far just a handful of cities have used
this approach for diversifying their departments, including St. Louis Park. In 2017 two candidates
went through this program successfully and are now police offers for St. Louis Park. However, the
he need to create a wider and deeper candidate pool will continue to be a long term challenge for
all police departments
Position: The City applauds the state funding which has been applied to this new approach thus
far and requests that this funding not only be maintained but increased in future biennium’s
Railroad and Hazardous Substance Safety
Issue: The current situation within St Louis Park suggests that there will be the continued shipment
of hazardous material commodities through the community including but not limited to crude oil
and ethanol at current or increased levels in the future. In the interest of public safety, the fire
service and emergency managers’ commonly work together to secure various types of information
for emergency planning and response. Railroad companies are reluctant if not unwilling to provide
information about hazardous materials moving through communities due to security concerns,
which makes it difficult to undertake proper emergency planning.
Analysis: Detailed and local railroad planning information would assist emergency managers in
assessing rail hazards, finding local vulnerabilities, gauging response capabilities, and identifying
specific gaps. Examples of information which should be provided under a non-disclosure
agreement (to insure the informatin is secure) includes:
• A disclosure of the railroad company’s response capability
• Information that is available on-scene and response-oriented (i.e. identity and quantity of
HAZMAT carried aboard rail cars involved in an incident). This information should be
provided in a manner that is useable by responders at the scene in a web based format as well
as the Ask Rail phone app.
In addition to the above information, railroad companies should be required to partner with local
jurisdictions, emergency planners and responders on training for responding to an incident.
Position: The City supports legislation that requires railroads to address the concerns noted above.
Oppose statutory prohibition on residential fire sprinklers (Request directed to State
Legislature)
Issue: The Appellate Court struck down the Department of Labor and Industries (DLI) adoption
of the latest International Residential Code (IRC). The IRC had a provision requiring residential
fire sprinklers in newly constructed one- and two-family homes that were 4,500 sq. feet and larger.
Analysis: The sprinkler provision was challenged as to whether it was done legally and
appropriately. The requirement to build these homes safer is no longer in effect. The sobering
reality is that, in terms of fire safety, the most dangerous place to be is at home. And most often
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 11
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
the victims of fire are the younger and older among us, who have a more difficult time getting out
in an emergency situation.
Residential fire sprinklers save lives. Fire sprinklers are cost-effective. In Minnesota recent studies
show the cost of installing residential fire sprinkler systems averages $1.15 per sprinkled square
foot, or approximately 1% of new home construction.
Position: Oppose efforts to prohibit future adoption of the Residential fire sprinkler code.
Oppose expansion of legal fireworks. (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: There is a continued effort to expand the sale and use of a wider variety of fireworks. In the
past, bills have been introduced that would expand the definition of legal fireworks to include
“aerial and audible”. These bills also proposed disallowing cities from banning the sale of
fireworks, but would allow cities to pass ordinances banning people from using fireworks.
Analysis: There is an inherent danger in aerial fireworks which cause a number of injuries and
pose a serious fire risk. Fireworks injuries in 2015 were the highest they have been in the last 10
years. 43% of the fireworks injuries in the past ten years happen to people 1-19 years of age
(children, teens, and young adults). Fire damage due to fireworks in 2014 was $1.75 million.
Position: Oppose the expansion of legal fireworks in Minnesota to include “aerial and audible”
Continued Health Insurance Coverage for Disabled Public Safety Officers (Request directed
to State Legislature)
Issue: MS299A.465 states that the employer is responsible for continued payment of their
contribution for health insurance coverage for police officers, firefighters, and dependents, if
applicable, that were disabled in the line of duty. The determination of disability in the line of
duty is made by the executive director of the Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA).
On October 1, 2013, the Minnesota Worker’s Compensation Act (MS 176.011) was amended to
include Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) as a compensable work comp injury if it arises out
of employment. This has resulted in a drastic increase in the number of employees who qualify for
this benefit. Although cities may request a reimbursement of the health insurance payments, only
a fraction is reimbursed from the Department of Public Safety, resulting in increasing costs due to
this unfunded mandate.
Position: The City of St. Louis Park does not have issues with this type of program. The questions
come with the interpretation of “in the line of duty” and also with funding of this unfunded
mandate.
• The city has six former public safety employees who qualify for continued payment of health
insurance. In some cases, there were questions about the intent of this language as it relates
to the term “injury in the line of duty.” For example, should a slip and fall in the office be
considered “in the line of duty?”
• The city has only been partially reimbursed for the cost of this mandate, and requests that
this program be fully funded by the state.
Permit to Purchase Firearms/Permit to Carry
Issue: Currently the Permits to Purchase Firearms statute (MN Stat. 624.7131; 624.7132) requires
local law enforcement agencies to complete required background checks within 7 days and the
Permit to Carry (MN Stat. 624.714) statute requires the County Sheriff’s Department to complete
the required background checks within 30 days.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 12
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Analysis: The St. Louis Park Police Department completes approximately 300 permits to purchase
background checks per year. Aligning the two statutes to require the background checks to be
done in 30 days would allow local law enforcement agencies more time to complete thorough
background checks and also reduce the number of applicants who act on impulse for a permit to
purchase a firearm.
Position: St. Louis Park supports aligning the Permits to Purchase Firearms statutes (MN Stat.
624.7131; 624.7132) with the Permit to Carry (MN Stat. 624.714) statute in terms of the time
required for conducting background checks (from 7 to 30 days).
Protecting the Privacy and Safety of Public Officials and Peace Officers
Issue: Only five states (FL, CO, CA, ID, TX) have a law prohibiting the publishing, posting,
promotion of peace officers' and other public officials' home addresses, phones, spouse's addresses,
other contact information, etc., with intent to cause harm or harassment. Minnesota has no such
law, presenting an opportunity to join other states showing a commitment to protecting public
officials and peace officers from having their personal information, spousal information, and other
info published and/or shared on social media, with the intention of causing harassment or harm.
Analysis: This is increasingly a concern for public officials and law enforcement when those
seeking to cause harm recklessly share or publish emails or other correspondence that includes
personal information. Any measure that reduces the threat of reporters or demonstrators showing
up at public officials homes or those of relatives is a great option for addition to our
statutes. Statutes that include the component requiring the publication or posting to be done WITH
INTENT to cause harassment or harm seem likely to be more useful and defensible in the courts.
Colorado's law can be found here:
http://www.leg.state.co.us/clics/clics2009a/csl.nsf/fsbillcont3/44EE4D5921D1B7248725757400
783E91?open&file=1316_enr.pdf. With the proliferation of social media, there have been several
instances where public officials personal information was disseminated to cause harm. For
example, after the unfortunate death of Eric Garner in New York, the decedent’s daughter tweeted
the home address of one of the involved officers to 5,000 Twitter followers who, in turn, re-tweeted
this 500+ times.
Position: This issue can affect any public official and Police Officers, when opposing sides of a
discourse attract an element that wants to cause harm or harassment. The City supports an effort
in Minnesota to add this protection to public officials’ privacy and the safety of their families.
General Issues
Local Control (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: Cities are often laboratories for determining public policy approaches to the challenges that
face citizens. Success in providing for the basic needs of a functional society is rooted in local
control to determine how best to respond to the ever-changing needs of a citizenry. Because city
government most directly impacts the lives of people, and representative democracy ensures that
locally elected officials are held accountable for their decisions through local elections, local
governments must have sufficient authority and flexibility to meet the challenges of governing and
providing citizens with public services.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 13
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Position: Individual communities should be allowed to tailor their services to meet the unique
needs of their citizens without mandates and policy restrictions imposed by state and federal policy
makers. The state should recognize that local governments, of all sizes, are often the first to identify
problems and inventive solutions to solve them, and should encourage further innovation by
increasing local control. The state should not enact initiatives that erode the fundamental principle
of local control in cities across Minnesota.
Levy Limits (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: During the 2008 legislative session, levy limits were imposed for three years (2009-2011)
on cities over 2,500 in population.
A one-time levy limit was applied to taxes levied in 2013, payable in 2014, only. This was in effect
for all counties with a population of 5,000 and over and cities with a population of 2,500 and over.
All cities with a population less than 2,500, all towns and all special taxing districts were exempt
from the limits.
Levy limits replace local accountability with a state judgment about the appropriate level of local
taxation and local services. Additionally, state restrictions on local budgets can have a negative
effect on a city’s bond rating due to the restriction on revenue flexibility.
Position: St. Louis Park opposes efforts to establish a levy limit or other proposed restrictions for
local government budgets. Based on our legislative policies that strongly support local budgetary
decision making, St. Louis Park opposes levy limits of any type.
Local Government Aid (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: St. Louis Park supports the LGA program as a means of ensuring all cities are able to
provide basic services without over-burdening the property tax system. In 2003 St. Louis Park
had its entire LGA allocation cut – approximately $2 million/yr. Several years ago a portion of
this cut was restored – approximately $500,000/yr. This funding has been extremely helpful,
particularly related to replacing aging infrastructure and equipment.
Position: St. Louis Park strongly opposes reductions of LGA
Legal Notices – Eliminate Requirement for Paid Publication (Request directed to State
Legislature)
Issue: Current law requires print ads for “proceedings, official notices, and summaries” in local
newspapers. In the 2011 Session, House File 162 called for allowing political subdivisions (cities,
counties, school boards, etc.) to replace the print ads with a single annual notice stating that all
such notices would appear on the political subdivision’s website (i.e. the city website).
Position: The city continues to support the elimination of this requirement, which would save cities
thousands of dollars in annual publishing costs. Publishing legal notices on the city website instead
allows the potential to reach a much greater audience in St. Louis Park than via the local
newspaper, which only reaches about half of the community. Additionally, businesses working
with the city or bidding on city projects find it cumbersome to monitor many different publications.
The city is currently publishing its legal notices at www.stlouispark.org in addition to publishing
them in the official newspaper.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 14
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Emerald Ash Borer – (Request directed to State Legislature)
Issue: Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) is the most destructive and economically costly forest pest ever
to invade North America. Ash trees killed by EAB become brittle very quickly and will begin to
fall apart and threaten overhead cables and power lines, vehicles, buildings and people. Few cities
are prepared and no city can easily afford the costs and the liability threats resulting from EAB.
Peer-reviewed studies have confirmed that a coordinated, landscape-based strategy is more cost
effective than fighting EAB city by city.
Position: St. Louis Park supports state funding to provide technical assistance and matching grants
to communities for EAB management/removal costs and related practices.
Records Retention Related to Correspondence
Issue: HF 1185 was introduced during the 2017 legislative session relating to data practices that
included changing the definition of “correspondence” in government record retention law to
include social media and text messaging and requiring a minimum three-year retention period for
correspondence.
Analysis: The proposed bill was designed to provide a statewide standard retention period for
correspondence. Concerns with the bill include an unfunded mandate on cities (especially small
ones) to meet the new requirements, and the burden of including social media and text messaging
in the definition of correspondence. Social media and text messaging capture typically requires
separate capture software / hardware than email, and thus contributes to increased costs.
Position: The city opposes the bill in its current form. State provided funding and restricting the
definition of correspondence to email at this point would be helpful. Delaying full inclusion of
social media and text messaging to future years so the State can include funding options (and
possibly some standards) would also be helpful. The city does support a standard correspondence
retention period and feels the proposed 3 year minimum is reasonable. That said, not every city is
funded or technically ready to do this. As a result, the city currently endorses the LMC position on
the role that should be fulfilled by existing records retention requirements. The current LMC
position is to oppose HF 1185.
Telecommunications and Information Technology
Issue: Telecommunications and information technology is essential public infrastructure for the
efficient, equitable, and affordable delivery of local government services to residents and
businesses. Telecommunications includes voice, video, data, and services delivered over cable,
telephone, fiber-optic, wireless, and all other platforms.
Analysis: The city and League of Minnesota Cities supports a balanced approach to
telecommunications policy that allows new technologies to flourish while preserving local
regulatory authority. Regulations and oversight of telecommunications services are important
prerogatives for local government to advance community interests, including the provision of high
quality basic services that meet local needs, spur economic development, and are available at
affordable rates to all consumers. For the City of St. Louis Park, this is also consistent with its
priority efforts to advance racial equity and to be a technology connected community. Supportive
policies should also not diminish local authority to work cooperatively with other public agencies,
non-profit organizations, and the private sector to broaden choice and competition of
telecommunications services to meet local needs.
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2016 (Item No. 1) Page 15
Title: 2018 Legislative Priorities and Issues – Meeting with Elected and Appointed Representatives
Position: The city opposes the adoption of state and federal policies that restrict cities’ ability to
finance, construct, or operate telecommunications networks.
Competitive Cable Franchising Authority
Issue: Despite claims made by some in the cable industry, studies and evidence to date do not
support that state franchising is the solution for competition, lower consumer rates, and improved
customer service. Unlike the exercise of local franchising authority, state franchising models
frequently make no provision for staffing at the state level or for effective resolution of consumer
complaints. The transmission of video signals, regardless of how they are transported, remains
subject to local franchising authority. Maintaining local franchising most effectively creates and
preserves agreements that guarantee broad access to services throughout the community, ensuring
there is no digital divide for access to video programming services.
Analysis: State policy should maintain local cable franchise authority and oversight of the rights-
of-way, as well as ensure franchise agreements reflect new technology, and are reasonably tailored
to the technical and operational differences among providers and communities. Independent
studies clearly demonstrate that statewide franchising does not increase direct competition to
incumbent cable franchisees. In Minnesota, there are markets throughout the state with two
franchised cable service providers, which is further proof that state cable franchising is neither
necessary nor warranted in Minnesota. The Legislature, Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), and Congress should also continue to recognize, support and maintain the exercise of local
franchising authority to encourage increased competition between incumbent cable system
operators and new wireline competitive video service providers including: maintaining provisions
in Minn. Stat. ch. 238 that establish and uphold local franchising authority, including the authority
to receive a gross revenues based franchise fee and local authority over areas including: control
and access to public rights-of-way by all video and cable service providers; fees on providers to
ensure the provision of public, educational, and governmental (PEG) programming; video
channels and video streaming for PEG programming equivalent to that of the local broadcast
stations; ensuring programming is accessible and searchable through detailed Electronic
Programming Guide listings that are equivalent to that of local broadcast stations; access to
capacity on institutional networks (I-Nets) provided by local cable system operators for public
safety communications, libraries, schools, and other public institutions; and strengthening local
authority to enforce customer service standards and transparency in pricing.
Position: Given the depth and breadth of cable TV PEG operations and subscribership in St. Louis
Park, and the fact that franchise negotiations will likely begin no later than early 2019, the city
endorses this League of Minnesota Cities policy position.
Meeting: Special Study Session
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Written Report: 2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Blake Road – St. Louis Park/Hopkins Detachment/Annexation
RECOMMENDED ACTION: No action at this time. The purpose of this report is to update
the City Council of the joint detachment/annexation proposed with the City of Hopkins in the
vicinity of Highway 7 and Blake Road. The council was last updated on this request by a written
report for the December 11, 2017 study session.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to participate in the proposed
concurrent detachment/annexation with the City of Hopkins as outlined by staff?
SUMMARY: Hennepin County in conjunction with the City of St. Louis Park, City of Hopkins,
City of Edina and MnDOT have been planning improvements to Blake Road from Vernon Ave S
to Hwy 7. Once completed, Hennepin County will turn the road jurisdiction and on-going
maintenance costs over to the cities. Approximately 150 feet of Blake Rd south of Hwy 7 lies
within the City of St. Louis Park, leaving 25% of the intersection signal system our
responsibility, along with on-going maintenance costs associated with the intersection. Since the
section of Blake Rd lying in St. Louis Park has low benefit to the city, Hopkins is agreeable to a
boundary adjustment that would alleviate St. Louis Park of the initial and on-going financial
obligations and simplifies jurisdictional ownership of the road and intersection.
The proposal is illustrated on the attached aerial photo. It removes land from St. Louis Park
located on the south side of Hwy 7 and annexes it into Hopkins. At the same time, land on the
north side of Hwy 7 will be removed from Hopkins and annexed into St. Louis Park. The end
result is that Hwy 7 west of Blake Road becomes the boundary between St. Louis Park and
Hopkins.
The City of St. Louis Park entry monument located at the southeast corner of the intersection
will remain on land located within St. Louis Park. Additionally, there is a mall located in the
southeast corner of the intersection. The mall is located in Hopkins, however, it’s pylon sign and
the north 40 feet of its parking lot along with its driveway is located in St. Louis Park. These
improvements would be transferred to Hopkins as a result of the boundary adjustment.
NEXT STEP: If the boundary adjustment is acceptable to the city council, staff will present the
Resolutions authorizing the detachment and annexation at the February 19, 2018 city council
meeting. The City Attorney has reviewed the Resolutions to be presented to the council on
February 20, 2018. Hopkins city council will act on similar Resolutions on February 5, 2018.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The boundary adjustment will release the
City of St. Louis Park from financial obligations resulting from the reconstruction of Blake Road
south of Highway 7.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Aerial Photos
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Administrator
Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Title: Blake Road – St. Louis Park/Hopkins Detachment/Annexation
AERIAL PHOTO:
Special Study Session Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 2) Page 3
Title: Blake Road – St. Louis Park/Hopkins Detachment/Annexation
Southeast corner of Hwy 7/Blake Rd
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Minutes: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 2, 2018
1. Call to Order
President Mavity called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m.
Commissioners present: President Anne Mavity, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris,
Thom Miller, Margaret Rog and Jake Spano.
Commissioners absent: None.
Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Community
Development Director (Ms. Barton), CIO (Mr. Pires), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr.
Shamla), City Clerk (Ms. Kennedy), Communications Manager (Ms. Larson), and Recording
Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes December 18, 2017
It was moved by Commissioner Hallfin, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve
the EDA minutes as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
4. Approval of Agenda
It was moved by Commissioner Hallfin, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to approve the
EDA agenda as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Reports
5a. Approval of EDA Disbursements
It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to approve
the EDA Disbursements.
The motion passed 7-0.
6. Old Business – None
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Economic Development Authority Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018
7. New Business
7a. Electing 2018 Economic Development Authority Officers.
It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to elect
Commissioner Hallfin as President, Commissioner Brausen as Vice-President, and
Commissioner Rog as Treasurer to the Economic Development Authority for the 2018
term.
The motion passed 7-0.
8. Communications - None
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:23 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, Secretary Steve Hallfin, President
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 5a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Approval of EDA Disbursements
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing EDA Disbursement Claims for the
period of December 23, through January 26, 2018.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in
accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA Bylaws?
SUMMARY: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review
and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and
those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information
follows the EDA’s Bylaws and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal
stewardship.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Disbursements
Prepared by: Kari Mahan, Accounting Clerk
Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:27:18R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
117,843.83ADAGIO LLC HOIGAARD VILLAGE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
117,843.83
86,306.79AQUILA SENIOR LLC AQUILA COMMONS G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
86,306.79
61,021.10BELT LINE PROPERTIES INC WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
61,021.10
450.00BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES
450.00
162,460.52CEDAR LAKE ROAD APARTMENTS LLC ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
162,460.52
455.13CENTERPOINT ENERGY MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE HEATING GAS
455.13
20,000.00CENTRAL PARK WEST LLC PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
20,000.00
30.00CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A TRAINING
30.00
677,062.95DUKE REALTY WEST END TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
677,062.95
28,147.32EDGEWOOD INVESTORS LLC EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
28,147.32
4,000.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 2008B GO TAX INCREM BONDS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,258.75BRIDGEWATEROTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
138.004900 EXC BLVD TIF DIST G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00CSM TIF DIST G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00MILL CITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00PARK COMMONS G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 2
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:27:18R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
235.00ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
150.00ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00AQUILA COMMONS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
150.00HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
7,581.75
75,708.62ELLIPSE II LLC ELLIPSE II G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
75,708.62
252,880.46ELLIPSE ON EXCELSIOR LLC ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
252,880.46
462,321.02GOTTMAR II LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
462,321.02
548,808.61GOTTMAR LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
548,808.61
529.44HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER 4900 EXC BLVD TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
982.15ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,351.44WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,279.97ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
743.15PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,429.85CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
529.45DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,217.56MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,517.20PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
607.79EDGEWOOD TIF DIST G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,985.82ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
697.02WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
526.17SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,110.42AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
730.93HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
556.18HARD COAT G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
25,794.54
50,159.13HIGHWAY 7 BUSINESS CENTER LLC HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
50,159.13
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 3
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:27:18R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
23,585.84HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING
23,585.84
1,549.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LEGAL SERVICES
826.75DEVELOPMENT - EDA BALANCE SHEE LAND HELD FOR RESALE
681.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES
425.00ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A LEGAL SERVICES
3,481.75
1,300.50LHB INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,300.50
9,000.00LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES
9,000.00
30,175.48MEDLEY ROW LLC HOIGAARD VILLAGE DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
30,175.48
42.81OFFICE DEPOT DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
42.81
80,635.00OLYMPUS VENTURES LLC HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A BOND PRINCIPAL
3,217.33HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A BOND INTEREST
83,852.33
2,700.00RHYTHM THEATER PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,700.00
1,384.39SEHDEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING
1,384.39
249,908.64SIDAL REALTY CO LTD PARTNERSHIP LLLP MILL CITY G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
249,908.64
486.00THE PARK THEATER COMPANY PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
486.00
440.00URBAN LAND INSTITUTE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
440.00
13,486.09WILSON DEVELOPMENT SERIVES LLC BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 4
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:27:18R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
13,486.09
72.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS MCGARVEY COFFEE SITE LAND MAINTENANCE
72.00
Report Totals 2,996,947.60
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 5a)
Title: Approval of EDA Disbursements Page 5
Meeting: Economic Development Authority
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Action Agenda Item: 7a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development
Associates LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt EDA Resolution approving the Preliminary
Development Agreement between the EDA, the City, and Sherman Associates LLC.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA/City Council support the proposed Preliminary
Development Agreement with Sherman Associates which formalizes the respective parties’
obligations relative to preparing a mixed-use development plan for the Beltline Blvd. Station Site?
SUMMARY: At the November 20, 2017 Special Study Session, the EDA/City Council selected
Sherman Associates as the development team with which it wishes to partner to redevelop the
SWLRT Beltline Blvd. Station Site. As a result, staff was directed to prepare a Preliminary
Development Agreement (PDA) between the EDA, the City and Sherman in which the parties
pledge to work cooperatively together toward a mutually acceptable mixed-use redevelopment
project plan for the Beltline Station Site. The purpose of the PDA is to formalize the respective
parties’ obligations under the SWLRT Funding Agreements with the Metropolitan Council and
the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) grant with the Federal Transit Administration for
the structured public parking at the SWLRT Beltline Station as well as the parties’ respective
responsibilities relative to further defining the Beltline Station Redevelopment project consistent
with the parties’ mutual objectives. The PDA also provides Sherman Associates with formal
permission to access the Station Site in order to conduct its due diligence. Further included in the
agreement is an outline for applying for land use and zoning changes as well as tax increment
financing assistance. During the term of the PDA, Sherman would be provided with exclusive
rights to negotiate acquisition of the subject properties with the EDA and the City. This is to provide
Sherman with assurance of its ability to secure the subject properties for the proposed mixed use
development. Sherman also agrees to reimburse the EDA for all reasonable out-of-pocket
administrative costs (such as legal and financial consulting fees) it incurs in connection with review
and analysis of the proposed redevelopment. The PDA would terminate if the EDA and City have not
approved a formal Purchase and Redevelopment Contract with Sherman by June 30, 2019.
The proposed PDA requires approval by both the EDA and City Council.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The precise purchase price of the EDA and
City-owned parcels as well as the amount of financial assistance necessary to bring the desired
mixed-use project to fruition at the Beltline Station Site will require further discussion with the
developer once the project’s actual components are fully defined. Implementation of both public
and private redevelopment plans for the Beltline Site will likely require TIF assistance.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: EDA Resolution
Preliminary Development Agreement
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 2
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
EDA RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
APPROVING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, AND SHERMAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LLC
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (“Authority”) as follows:
1. Background.
1.01. The Authority and the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”) own certain property (the“Property”) in the City, which Property has been the subject of certain preliminary negotiations with Sherman Development Associates LLC (the “Developer”) for purposes of constructing a mixed-use (multi-family residential and commercial), mixed-income development on the Property and related parking, incorporating renewable energy sources (the “Development”), to enhance and complement a proposed Southwest LRT station adjacent to the Property.
1.02. The Authority, the City and the Developer have determined to enter into a preliminary development agreement (the “PDA”), providing for negotiation of a definitive development contract that will address (among other things) terms under which the Developer will construct the Development on the Property, and the Authority may provide certain financial assistance if warranted to make development by the Developer financially feasible.
1.03. The Board has reviewed the PDA, and has determined that it is in the best interests of the Authority to approve and execute the PDA.
2.Approval of PDA.
2.01. The Authority approves the PDA, and authorizes and directs the President andExecutive Director to execute same in substantially the form on file, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the PDA by such officials will be conclusive evidence of their approval.
2.02. Authority officials and consultants are authorized to take any other actions necessary to carry out the Authority’s obligations under the PDA, and to bring a proposed definitive development contract before the Authority.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority
February 5, 2018
Thomas K Harmening, Executive Director Steve Hallfin, President
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, Secretary
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 3
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
DRAFT, January 18, 2018
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), dated as of
_________, 2018, by and between the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a public
body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”), the City of St.
Louis Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), and Sherman Associates Development
LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Developer”);
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Authority and the City desire to promote development of certain property
within Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the “Project”) in the City as follows: Parcel A, located at 4601
Highway 7; Parcel B, located at 3130 Monterey Avenue South; Parcel C, consisting of certain
right-of-way along Highway 7 and Monterey Avenue South (together, the “City and Authority
Property”); and Parcel D, located at 4725 Highway 7 (the “Council Property” and together with
the City and Authority Property, the “Property”), all as depicted and described in Exhibit A; and
WHEREAS, the City and Authority Property is owned by the City or the Authority, and the
Council Property is in the process of being acquired by the Metropolitan Council; and
WHEREAS, the City and Authority have determined that it is in the best interests of the City
that the Developer be designated as the sole developer of the City and Authority Property during the
term of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City has entered into a Master Funding Agreement with the Metropolitan
Council, dated as of February 3, 2015 to fund certain activities by the City or Developer in
connection with the Developer’s desire to develop the City and Authority Property (the “Master
Funding Agreement”), and has received a CMAQ grant from the Federal Transit Administration
to partially fund structured public parking in connection with such development (the “CMAQ
Grant,” and together with any funds awarded pursuant to Subordinate Funding Agreements
executed in connection with the Master Funding Agreement and/or any future grants awarded to
the City or Authority in relation to the City and Authority Property, the “Grants”); and
WHEREAS, the Developer desires to acquire the City and Authority Property for purposes
of constructing a mixed-use (multi-family residential and commercial), mixed-income development
on the City and Authority Property incorporating renewable energy sources, including without
limitation clean energy generated from an offsite solar garden, and related parking (the
“Development”); and
WHEREAS, the Developer has requested the Authority and City to explore the use of tax
increment financing under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174 to 469.1794, as amended (the “Tax
Increment Act”), or other public financial assistance to offset a portion of the public costs of the
Development; and
WHEREAS, the Authority, the City and the Developer are willing and desirous to undertake
the Development if (i) a satisfactory agreement can be reached regarding the City’s and/or Authority's
commitment for public costs necessary for the Development; (ii) satisfactory mortgage and equity
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 4
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
financing, or adequate cash resources, for the Development can be secured by Developer; (iii) the
parties reach a satisfactory resolution of zoning, land use, public infrastructure, and site design issues;
and (iv) the economic feasibility and soundness of the Development and other necessary
preconditions have been determined to the satisfaction of the parties; and
WHEREAS, the parties wish to enter into this Agreement setting forth their respective
responsibilities in connection with the Property.
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and
obligations set forth herein, the Authority, the City and the Developer hereby agree as follows:
1. During the term of this Agreement, the Authority and the City agree to designate the
Developer as the sole developer of the City and Authority Property and to negotiate solely with the
Developer relative to the acquisition and development of the City and Authority Property. As
consideration for this designation, the Developer shall pay a nonrefundable deposit of $25,000 (the
“Development Deposit”) to the City upon execution of this Agreement, with additional Development
Deposit amounts due and payable under the following terms and conditions:
(a) If the Developer does not submit a completed application for preliminary plat and
PUD approvals within six months after the date on which the parties agree on the Timeline (as defined
in paragraph 2 hereof), the Developer shall pay the City an additional nonrefundable Development
Deposit of $25,000.
(b) If the Developer does not receive final plat and PUD approvals and approval of the
definitive Contract (as defined in paragraph 2 hereof) by June 30, 2019, which approvals shall not be
unreasonably withheld, the date of termination of this Agreement as described in paragraph 17 hereof,
but the parties wish to continue toward final approvals and execution of the Contract, the parties shall
negotiate an amendment extending the date of this Agreement and the Developer shall pay the City
an additional nonrefundable Development Deposit of $25,000.
(c) If the parties execute the Contract and proceed to closing on the conveyance of all or
a portion of the City and Authority Property by August 31, 2019, all Development Deposit amounts
paid to the City by the Developer shall be applied to the purchase price of such property.
2. The parties agree to work cooperatively towards defining the Development and its
components (including but not limited to site design, building plans and specifications, number of
market-rate and affordable residential units, commercial square footage, building stories and height,
sustainable and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) components and structured parking,
stormwater management, streets and sidewalks, and all other necessary public infrastructure
improvements), determining its financial feasibility, the infrastructure necessary to service it, and the
approvals necessary to bring it to fruition, as well as to negotiate in good faith toward a definitive
Purchase and Redevelopment Contract (the “Contract”), a related planning development contract
regarding the Development, and a timeline for the Development that takes into account the acquisition
of the Council Property and the timing of necessary public infrastructure improvements (the
“Timeline”).
3. Developer shall prepare a project pro forma (including a detailed list of various revenue
sources and respective amounts necessary to bring the Development to fruition) and submit it to the
Authority for its review.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 5
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
4. Developer shall work to secure satisfactory mortgage and equity financing, and any additional
forms of financing necessary to bring the Development to fruition.
5. Developer understands the Development will be subject to the City’s Green Building Policy
adopted February 16, 2010, as amended, and the City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy adopted May
17, 2017, as amended, and agrees to abide by the requirements of these documents if the parties enter
into the Contract. In addition, the Developer shall comply with the provisions of the City’s Climate
Action Plan if and when approved by the City Council.
6. In connection with this Agreement, the City and Authority hereby grant to the Developer, its
agents, employees, officers, and contractors (the “Authorized Parties”) a right of entry on the City
and Authority Property for the purpose of performing all due diligence work and inspections deemed
necessary by the Developer to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement (the “Permitted Activities”).
The Authorized Parties shall have access to the City and Authority Property Mondays through Fridays
between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., and Saturdays between the hours of 9 a.m. and 7 p.m.
Developer hereby agrees to be responsible for any and all costs related to the Permitted Activities
conducted on the City and Authority Property by the Authorized Parties, and to restore the City and
Authority Property to its original condition upon completion of the Permitted Activities. Developer
agrees to indemnify, save harmless, and defend the City, the Authority, and their officers and
employees, from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability and expense in connection
with personal injury and/or damage to the City and Authority Property arising from or out of any
occurrence in, upon or at the City and Authority Property caused by the act or omission of the
Authorized Parties in conducting the Permitted Activities on the City and Authority Property, except
(a) to the extent caused by the negligence, gross negligence, willful misrepresentation or any willful
or wanton misconduct by the City or Authority, their officers, employees, agents or contractors; and
(b) to the extent caused by a “Pre-Existing Condition” as defined in this paragraph 6. “Pre-Existing
Condition” shall mean any condition caused by the existence of hazardous substances or materials in,
on, or under the City and Authority Property, including without limitation hazardous substances
released or discharged into the drainage systems, soils, groundwater, waters or atmosphere, which
condition existed as of the date of this Agreement and became known or was otherwise disclosed or
discovered by reason of the Authorized Parties’ entry onto the City and Authority Property.
7. The City will determine the municipal regulatory approvals required for the Development
including, but not limited to, land use amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, zoning changes,
permits, and any other necessary municipal approvals.
8. The City agrees to provide guidance to the Developer on its applications for any approvals or
land use guidance and zoning changes as may be required in connection with the Development.
However, the City makes no guarantees as to any approvals or land use guidance and zoning changes
as may be required in connection with the Development.
9. The City will review existing traffic studies pertinent to the Development and undertake any
additional traffic studies deemed necessary by the City in its sole discretion, and the Developer agrees
to place sufficient funds in escrow to pay for any such studies, upon request by the City.
10. The Developer agrees to complete an Application for Tax Increment Finance Assistance (the
“Application”), and pay the required application fee of $3,000 plus an administrative deposit of
$50,000 for the Authority’s costs described in paragraph 14 (the “Administrative Deposit”) to the
Authority.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 6
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
11. The Authority agrees to direct its staff and legal and financial consultants to review and
analyze the Application and the Development’s pro forma and help determine the terms of tax
increment or other financial assistance required for the Development.
12. The Authority agrees to undertake an analysis to determine the feasibility of creating a tax
increment financing district in connection with the Development and Property, and Developer agrees
that the Administrative Deposit shall be used, in part, to pay for any such analysis. The Developer
will cooperate with the Authority’s review and analysis, and provide to the Authority all documents
and information requested by the Authority in connection with that effort.
13. If, in the Authority’s sole discretion, the Development is feasible and public financial
assistance is indicated, the Authority, the City, and the Developer will negotiate towards a definitive
Contract providing generally for (a) purchase of the Property by the Developer; (b) pay-as-you-go tax
increment assistance in an amount determined by the Authority to be necessary to make the
Development financially feasible; and (c) timely construction of the Development by Developer. Any
definitive Contract is subject to approval by the Authority’s board of commissioners. It is expressly
understood that the Contract, when executed, will supersede this Agreement in all respects. Execution
and implementation of the Contract shall be subject to:
(a) A determination by the Authority in its sole discretion that its undertakings are
feasible based on (i) the projected tax increment revenues and any other revenues designated
by the Authority or City, including any Grants; (ii) the purposes and objectives of any tax
increment, development, or other plan created or proposed for the purpose of providing
financial assistance for the Development; and (iii) the best interests of the City and Authority.
(b) A determination by the Authority that any financial assistance is reasonably
necessary in order to make the Development financially feasible, and that any such assistance
is limited to the amount necessary to achieve financial feasibility based on Developer’s pro
forma and review of all the facts and circumstances.
(c) A determination by the Developer that the Development is both market and
economically feasible and in the best interests of the Developer, and that the Developer is able
to meet all the requirements of the Contract.
14. The Developer will reimburse the Authority for all reasonable out-of-pocket costs incurred
by the Authority in connection with review and analysis of the Development, if such costs exceed the
amount of the Administrative Deposit described in paragraph 10. Such costs include fees paid to
attorneys, the Authority’s financial advisor, and any planning and engineering consultants retained
by the Authority in connection with review of the Development. The Developer must pay such costs
to the Authority within 30 days after receipt of a written invoice from the Authority describing the
amount and nature of the costs to be reimbursed.
15. This Agreement may be terminated (a) by the Developer at any time upon 10 day’s written
notice to the Authority; (b) by mutual written agreement of all parties hereto; or (c) pursuant to
paragraph 17 hereof. Upon such termination, no party shall have any further obligations to the others
under this Agreement, except that Developer remains obligated to pay any costs payable under
paragraph 14 that were incurred by the Authority before the date on which the Developer gave written
notice of termination. The Developer acknowledges that all Development Deposit amounts are
nonrefundable if this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this paragraph.
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 7
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
16. In expansion and not in limitation of paragraph 15 hereof, Developer agrees to notify the
Authority and City and to terminate this Agreement as soon as reasonably practicable if the Developer
determines that the proposed Development is not market and economically feasible, or if the
Developer is unable to secure the financing necessary for the Development, or if the Developer for
any reason is unable to bring the Development to fruition.
17. This Agreement shall terminate by its terms if the governing bodies of the Authority and City
have not approved the Contract by June 30, 2019, subject to the parties’ agreement to extend this
Agreement as described in paragraph 1(b) hereof. Upon such termination, the Developer remains
obligated to pay any costs payable under paragraph 14 that were incurred by the Authority and the
City prior to such date. The Developer acknowledges that all Development Deposit amounts are
nonrefundable if this Agreement terminates pursuant to this paragraph.
18. Notice or demand or other communication between or among the parties shall be sufficiently
given if sent by overnight mail or delivered personally:
(a) As to the City:
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
(b) As to the Authority:
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority
5005 Minnetonka Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
(c) As to the Developer:
Sherman Associates Development LLC
233 Park Avenue South, Suite 201
Minneapolis, MN 55415
19. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, all
of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
20. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be
heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection
to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise.
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 8
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Authority have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed in their name and behalf and their seal to be duly affixed hereto and the Developer has
caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date and year first above written.
SHERMAN ASSOCIATES DEVELOPMENT
LLC
ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
By: By: _____________________________
Its ___________________________ Its President
By: _____________________________
Its Executive Director
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By: ______________________________
Its Mayor
By: ______________________________
Its City Manager
Economic Development Authority Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 7a) Page 9
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, City & Sherman Development Associates LLC
PROPERTY
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Presentation: 2a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Recognition of Donations
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to announce and express thanks and appreciation for the
following donations being accepted at the meeting and listed on the Consent Agenda:
From Amount For
Brian & Sidonia Johnson,
Patrick & Melanie Padden, and
Richard & Jill Johnson
$2,200 A bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center
honoring Dick Johnson’s 90th birthday
Jewish Community Relations
Council (JCRC)
All travel
expenses
Monetary donation to allow three police
department staff to attend their annual
educational trip to the Holocaust Museum in
Washington DC on April 24th, 2018
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Minutes: 3a
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 8, 2018
The meeting convened at 6:00 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Director of Inspections (Mr. Hoffman), Deputy
City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Director of Operations and Recreation (Ms.
Walsh), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Police Chief (Mr. Harcey), Planner (Ms. Monson),
Economic Development Coordinator (Mr. Hunt), Director of Community Development (Ms.
Barton), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Planning & Zoning Supervisor (Mr.
Walther), Communications & Marketing Manager (Ms. Larson), Westwood Nature Center
Manager (Mr. Oestreich), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
Guest: Dean Dovolis, Architect; Peter Bruen, Bridgewater Bank; Nancy Blankfard, Glenn
Waguespack, HGA Architect firm.
1. Future Study Session Agenda Planning – January 16 & 22, 2018
Councilmember Brausen stated that he would like to review the process for posting the city council
meeting agendas on social media sites, on the Thursday or Friday before the meeting, so
community members can see it in advance of the meetings. He added that he would like to discuss
putting the consent agenda on the screen for the at-home audience, so that people can see what is
being approved by the council. He considers this part of the public process and would like to
address it at the next study session. Councilmember Brausen also noted that the January 22 study
session agenda looks very long, especially with the Climate Action Plan, and asked if staff would
consider moving the Louisiana Bridge replacement discussion back one week.
Mayor Spano asked if there are timing issues related to the Louisiana Bridge discussion. Mr.
Harmening stated that the bridge is slated to be replaced in 2019, and the only concern is getting
into the queue for MnDOT funding this spring. He added that the February 12 study session will
work for discussion of this item.
Councilmember Miller stated that he would like to see the Walker Lake discussion on the agenda
soon, adding that he would like to address a comprehensive plan for the area. Mr. Harmening
stated that there will be a written report for the January 22 meeting. He added that after the council
reviews the report, they should let him know if they would like more information, and the item
can be brought back for further discussion.
Councilmember Mavity asked when would be the appropriate time to bring up changes in the city’s
zoning code, pointing out issues with streetscape at Fresh Tyme on Quentin Avenue as an example.
Mr. Harmening stated that Ms. Barton is currently working on a zoning code amendment, and this
will come forward shortly to the council for discussion.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Study Session Minutes of January 8, 2018
2. Bridgewater Bank Development Proposal at Excelsior Boulevard and Monterey
Drive
Ms. Monson stated that the developer, Bridgewater Bank, and the architect for the development
will present the site plan, and council will be asked to comment on the concept plan. She noted
that Bridgewater Bank proposes to locate their bank headquarters at 4424 and 4400 Excelsior
Boulevard, and 3743 Monterey Drive. The applicant controls two of the parcels, and the EDA
owns the parcel at Monterey Drive. Ms. Monson said that the development cannot proceed as
proposed without the EDA parcel. She stated that the building height, setbacks, site circulation and
plaza are designed to respond to comments raised during a previous process in 2015 for the same
site.
Ms. Monson noted that the proposal includes a plaza at the corner of Excelsior Boulevard and
Monterey Drive, with outdoor seating, space for public art and landscaping. Retail spaces would
be on Excelsior Boulevard, and Bridgewater Bank’s customer branch on the first floor.
Additionally, floors 2-4 include the bank’s executive offices and opportunities for shared office
uses. Ms. Monson stated that a traffic study is forthcoming for presentation to the council. She
added that the development will include office, retail, and service businesses, and will be designed
for mobility for pedestrians, bikes and cars. This total new development, including parking, is 53%
smaller than the formerly proposed project and the occupied spaces are about one-third of the size
of the last proposal. This size lessens the overall massing of the building on Excelsior and
Monterey. She also said additional right-of-way will be dedicated for bike lanes on Monterey
Drive.
Ms. Monson stated that access to the site is being studied further as part of the traffic study. Mr.
Dovolis added that this project will be a future gateway to the SWLRT, Excelsior and Grand, and
Wolfe Park and will be a public place with stores, a restaurant, and a fitness center. The retail
banking corporate headquarters, with 190 employees, will also be located there. Parking will be in
back of and below the structure. Mr. Dovolis added that there will be substantial landscaping with
the building scaled back for breathing room for bikes and pedestrians.
Councilmember Mavity stated that she serves on a board with the COI of Bridgewater, and will
need to recuse herself from voting on the project. She will however be involved as it relates to
traffic and access issues.
Councilmember Rog stated that in Ward 1 there were some concerns about trucks idling and
backing up. Mr. Dovolis agreed that the truck back up sounds can be bothersome, but they are
required by federal regulation. He noted that this could be resolved with screening and scheduling
and that they will work with city staff on this.
Councilmember Rog stated that the plaza looks nice with the greenery and asked what it will look
like in the winter. Mr. Dovolis stated that in the winter, the plaza could double as a skating rink
with fire pits and as an area for other winter activities.
Councilmember Harris added that the development is a beautiful design, stating that she is looking
forward to the conversation as it evolves. She asked where the parking would be for drivers going
to the restaurant. Mr. Dovolis stated that the parking area, lobby and entrance to the restaurant are
in the back - a convenience for both pedestrians and drivers.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Study Session Minutes of January 8, 2018
Councilmember Miller stated that this plan is a huge improvement over the last one, adding that
there are now wider setbacks with lower height and perceived density. He asked if there will be
more people now going to and from the complex versus only residents in the last plan. Mr. Dovolis
stated that there will be different peak times, adding that this will be reviewed in the traffic study.
Councilmember Miller asked if the EDA would be willing to consider TIF, due to the extraordinary
costs with this plan. Mr. Hunt stated that there are some challenges with the redevelopment,
including significant demolition costs and parking garage construction costs in this very tight site.
Councilmember Miller stated he is in favor of moving forward, and although he is concerned about
traffic, he is open to hearing more from the traffic study.
Mr. Dovolis added that the office space would be quiet during the weekends, as the bank’s business
would take place during the work week. He added that the retail and the restaurant would be busy
on weekends.
Councilmember Brausen asked what small service uses mean for the rest of the bank floors. Mr.
Brodd, representing Bridgewater, stated that this means those who would rent space from the bank.
He added that these businesses would partner with the bank to create a type of economic hub in
St. Louis Park, with potential synergy for entrepreneurs and future bank customers.
Councilmember Brausen stated that he likes the pedestrian friendly area presented, but he still
wishes for affordable housing there. However, he added that the council limited the developer at
this site, and in so doing, the plan was limited in affordable housing. He voiced concerns about
using TIF, especially if affordable housing is not included, but he is open to having only
commercial.
Mayor Spano stated that he likes the proposal and is in favor of moving forward with the discussion.
He likes the design’s diversity of streetscape, the setbacks, and the fact that it is not parallel with the
street. He likes the plaza and added that the office space helps to bring balance to all the housing in
the area. He likes the bike lanes and appreciates the logo being discreet, adding that the business
function in the development will positively impact the other businesses in the area.
3. Westwood Hills Nature Center Project Update
Mr. Harmening reviewed the history of the project and that it has been discussed for two years.
The master plan came to council in May of 2016, with further discussion and tours of other
facilities in the fall of 2016. Staff then sought out architectural proposals, and HGA presented the
schematic design. He stated that staff and HGA have presented the design and have revised it to
offer other options now, shrinking the size of the building and reducing the cost to approximately
$12 million. Mr. Harmening stated that the $12 million has been set into the long range and capital
improvement plans. Given the condition of the building and the demands on the facility, something
will need to be done sooner rather than later. He asked the council if they have everything they
need from staff to move forward.
Councilmember Harris stated that she is interested in seeing what shifted in the interior space and
asked if there is now more shared space for visitors who are not students. Mr. Waguespack stated
that the square footage has been reduced; raptor cages are smaller; and the building is more
efficient with the reconfiguration of the public space. There is now a balance of public and
classroom space. Classroom A can open to public lobby space to provide a larger multipurpose
space and more relationship between the exhibit and classroom space. Mr. Wageuspack stated that
the east and west sides were also reduced, and the building is now approximately 12,750 square
feet. He pointed out that the current building is 2,700 square feet.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Title: Study Session Minutes of January 8, 2018
Councilmember Hallfin stated that he did not want any changes and would prefer to go back to the
other plan, but added he would agree with this in order to move the project forward.
Councilmember Brausen asked staff if this is adequate space for the vision and goals of the
building. Mr. Oestreich stated that current programming allows for 60 in the classroom, but there
are times when groups are turned away because of space limitations. He added that the space is
not big enough for volunteer programs. With more space, there will be many opportunities for
multi-age groups to visit in addition to school kids. Councilmember Brausen pointed out that the
previous plan included 15,000 square feet and asked if there is enough space with this revised plan.
Mr. Wageuspack stated that the public space can connect to classroom A, creating a multipurpose-
space of 2,250-square feet.
Councilmember Rog stated she is fully supportive of a new nature center for the community;
however, she added that she has spoken to many citizens who are asking about the high price of
this project. She pointed out that several other facilities in the metro area were built in the $5.5
million range and asked why the additional $7-9 million is needed. Ms. Blankfard stated that much
of this is the cost of the higher performance materials which are needed to provide the zero energy
requirements. Ms. Walsh added that construction costs have risen 3-5% per year, and with
inflation, costs have increased.
Councilmember Rog asked if resources could be put toward other community sustainability
projects versus channeling all resources into one facility.
Councilmember Harris asked if when looking at the long-range climate action plan how imperative
it is that the city meet zero energy with this building.
Councilmember Mavity asked how much the project can be engineered down to reduce costs. She
stated that a new building is greatly needed and will have to last, adding that she is inclined to
move forward.
Councilmember Miller thanked HGA and staff for this plan; however, he stated he is opposed to
the project as it is today. He stated that he has been in favor of doing something with the nature
center; however, he would like to see lower cost alternatives in the $5-6 million range. He noted
that as the year progresses, unforeseen projects come up in the city, which requires liquidity. He
added that the 5% tax increases every year are not sustainable, and we are doing the same things
that we criticize landlords for. Councilmember Miller stated that he would like to see alternative
plans with a much lower price tag.
Councilmember Brausen stated that he disagrees with Councilmember Miller, adding that the city
did community visioning and determined the needs of nature center programs. He stated that there
is a need for 2-3 classrooms. It is essential that the center be pleasant and a neighborhood amenity.
Councilmember Brausen added that Ward 4 residents want to see development in this area and
would like improvements and enhancements at the nature center. If downsizing to 12,000 square
feet is the option, he will approve that.
Councilmember Harris stated that many residents have shared how much they like coming to the
nature center; however, she has also heard from residents about affordable housing and the costs
of daily life, as well. She stated that even though she is a strong environmentalist, she would like
to see the costs of the center with 50 or 75% of the zero-energy plan. Additionally, she agreed with
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Title: Study Session Minutes of January 8, 2018
Councilmember Brausen that residents want to see more development on the west side of St. Louis
Park.
Councilmember Rog stated that a bigger and better nature center is in order; however, she is having
trouble with the costs and also wondering if there has been a full public process on the project. She
added that she has talked to a lot of people, and there were fewer than five that knew about a new
nature center. Less than three people knew about the costs. She said that she wants to make sure
that residents know what they are signing on for. She stated that people may support nature center
improvements, but in her estimation, the community is not informed about this plan.
Councilmember Rog added that she has heard about other projects, such as affordable housing,
money for kids in the park, forgivable loans in the Walker Lake District, and tax relief. However,
she is not satisfied with the public process for the nature center improvements, adding that if she
felt she was representing what residents wanted, she would support this; however right now, she
does not.
Councilmember Miller stated that there may be other entities interested in supporting the project,
rather than St. Louis Park paying for all of it. He added that there may be regional dollars available
to help offset the costs, adding that there are 70 counties that have visitors who come to the nature
center. This, along with a capital campaign or securing private donors, would help.
Councilmember Mavity stated she would not endorse private donors with naming rights.
Councilmember Miller agreed. Councilmember Mavity added that the public outreach on this
project was extensive. She added that the council has discussed this project for two years, and
though she would like to see the cost reduced, residents wanted environmental and zero-based
energy at the nature center. She added that she also has received emails about costs, noting that
there will be more decisions coming with the climate action plan, as well.
Councilmember Rog stated that to move this project forward, we need to see what other options
are possible.
Mayor Spano stated that coming up with a $5-6 million project would require going back to the
drawing board and would be a disservice to the process.
It was the consensus of the City Council to move forward with the revised 12,000-foot design,
while asking for energy tiering alternatives.
4. SLP Policing Model/Critical Incident Planning Follow-up Discussion (Part 2)
Chief Harcey was present to answer questions from the council.
Councilmember Brausen asked what Iftar is. Chief Harcey stated that it is a celebration of the end
of Ramadan. The police participated in the celebration as a partnership with the community, while
also conducting some education. Councilmember Brausen added that he has gained further
appreciation for the Police Department’s understanding of diversity and thanked Chief Harcey for
sharing this experience. He asked what specific training the police have regarding interacting with
non-white residents. Chief Harcey stated that they have brought cultural diversity training to the
department through the Joint Community Police Partnership Program and have had in-depth
discussions with various groups, including the Multi-Cultural Advisory Committee and the Jewish
Community Relations Council. He stated it is important to learn about the community we serve in
order to serve them better.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Title: Study Session Minutes of January 8, 2018
Councilmember Miller stated that he appreciated the 4 sessions on the SLP Policing Model/Critical
Incident Planning. They helped him to understand how the Police Department is increasing
diversity from within. He asked what is being done to further the community policing model and
also what the plan is for dash and body cameras. Chief Harcey stated that they are putting together
a work plan on body and dash cameras, and will work with the PAC, MAC, HRC, the school
district, and citizen groups to get input and feedback on what will work in St. Louis Park. He stated
that it will be a 7-8-month process to put together a plan, and then there will be a public forum
with open comments from the community. Implementation is proposed for 2019.
Councilmember Rog thanked Chief Harcey for all four sessions, and she read a memo from the
HRC regarding body cameras, their costs, and if they are needed in St. Louis Park. She noted this
will be a good conversation to have.
Councilmember Mavity stated that she is also very proud of the Police Department. She asked
about the police vision and mission being updated, since it has been in place for 20 years. She
stated that community policing is embraced by St. Louis Park, and it adds value to the community.
She also asked about data or metrics surrounding race equity goals within departments. She stated
that she is interested in data regarding arrests, race-based interactions, and if there are any racial
trends. She added this data is necessary in order to understand where the police can do better.
Chief Harcey noted that traditionally the department has not collected race data on traffic stops
and would need to dig deeper into how to collect and report the data properly. He stated this
information could be collected from arrest data. He noted that he and the Deputy Chief will be
attending a conference soon to learn how to collect data and report it. He added that data collection
could begin next year.
Mayor Spano noted the communications presentation and stated that he is glad the city has hired
a firm to help during a crisis. He stated that he would like more discussion about social media;
how issues can escalate; and what happens when the council unity starts to fall apart.
Councilmember Harris agreed, noting that it might be helpful to add an experiential component to
see how a situation might roll out. She added it would be helpful to talk with residents, and also
the consultant, especially learning how to respond in a protest situation.
Chief Harcey stated that he hopes the Police Department’s community partners would help in a
protest situation, so it could be worked through in advance. He also noted that the community
engagement vehicle is still in the planning process and hopefully will be operational later this year
as a way to engage the community where they live, work and play.
5. Review Draft Agenda for 2018 City Council Workshop
Ms. Deno noted that Councilmembers Mavity, Brausen, and Hallfin met to discuss and set the
agenda for the upcoming City Council Workshop. She stated that the council will start with
relational learning on Thursday and then look at the past, present, and future on Friday. Facilitators
for the workshop will be Bridget Gothberg and M.L. Rice. The retreat will be held Thursday,
January 18, and Friday, January 19.
6. Review Draft of 2018 Legislative Priorities
Mr. Harmening said staff has prepared a draft list of legislative issues and priorities. A final version
will be reviewed at a special study session on February 5 with Senator Latz; Representatives
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 7
Title: Study Session Minutes of January 8, 2018
Cheryl Youakim and Peggy Flanagan; Hennepin County Commissioner Marion Greene; and
Metropolitan Council Representative Gail Dorfman.
Mayor Spano noted the draft of legislative issues for council review. He said that in past years,
items were ranked. He also stated that pre-emption is a concern and anything that limits local city
control. He added that affordable housing and transportation are the most important issues to the
city at this time.
Councilmember Brausen agreed that affordable housing is a priority issue.
Councilmember Rog emphasized that the Minnetonka Boulevard project (with no safety
compromises) and affordable housing are priority issues.
Councilmember Miller stated that he supports the draft presented by staff.
Councilmember Mavity stated that the increased focus on immigration and ICE, and more
articulation about what this means in St. Louis Park is an issue of concern, especially as it relates
to Hennepin County. She proposed that the city would maintain public safety and abide by the law
but the city does not want Hennepin County (as a representative of the city) to do any more than
that.
Councilmember Rog stated that improvement of crossing safety west of Highways 100 to 169 is a
priority for Ward 1, adding safety needs must be clarified for the whole corridor from 100 to 169.
Mayor Spano also noted that the Pathways to Policing Program as a priority and a very effective
tool for increasing diversity on our police force. He stated that he would like to see more funding
for this program to help it expand to other cities.
Mayor Spano stated that the council will continue to look at this draft and will revisit the topics
again prior to the February 5 meeting.
Communications/Meeting Check-In (Verbal)
Mr. Harmening reminded the council that Thursday is Sue Sanger’s recognition party from 5-8
p.m. at the Rec Center. The Mayor will be in charge of the program. There will be speakers, and
former Councilmember Sanger will speak, as well.
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
7. Proposed Zoning Amendment for Architectural Materials for Greenhouses
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Minutes: 3b
OFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 16, 2018
1. Call to Order
Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Knutson), Engineering Director
(Ms. Heiser), Sr. Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Project Engineer (Mr. Wiesen),
Transportation Engineer (Mr. Manibog), Fire Chief ( Mr. Koering), City Clerk (Ms. Kennedy),
and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
Guests: Justin Grays, Noelle Racette, Traffic Consultant Mike Spack
1a. Pledge of Allegiance
1b. Roll Call
2. Presentations – St. Louis Park is “Not for Sale” Proclamation
Mayor Spano read the proclamation to help raise awareness and advance programs aimed
at preventing human trafficking. He stated that Hopkins student Jessica Melvick raised
concerns about human trafficking during the upcoming Superbowl in Minneapolis. Mayor
Spano noted that Girls United Minnesota will host an event on February 15 from 6:30–
8:30 p.m. at Eisenhower Center. The purpose of the event is to raise awareness about sexual
exploitation and human trafficking. Cornerstone and the St. Louis Park Police will also be
in attendance.
3. Approval of Minutes
3a. City Council Meeting Minutes December 18, 2017
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
the City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017, as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
3b. City Council Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to approve
the City Council Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018, as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2018
4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar
4a. Adopt Resolution No. 18-011 authorizing final payment in the amount of
$56,186.37 for Project 4016-1100 MSA Street Rehabilitation – Flag Avenue /
Quentin Avenue, City Contract No. 92-16
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 18-012 authorizing staff to enter into a Cooperative
Agreement with Hennepin County. The agreement is for a feasibility study to
consider connections across the BNSF Railroad adjacent to Highway 100 - Project
No. 4018-2000.
4c. Adopt Resolution No. 18-013 authorizing installation of temporary parking
restrictions in front of 4245 Toledo Avenue.
4d. Adopt Resolution No. 18-014 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of
the sewer service line at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D.
06-028-24-41-0041.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 18-015 to recognize Public Service Worker Randy Lawrence
for more than 37 years of service.
Mayor Spano recognized Public Service Worker Randy Lawrence for his more than 37
years of service to the city. Mr. Lawrence was not in attendance.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading
of all resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Boards and Commissions – None
6. Public Hearings
6a. First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to
Campaign Finance Contributions
Ms. Kennedy presented the staff report. She stated that in 2017 a discrepancy was found
between Sec.12.04 of the Home Rule Charter and the campaign contribution limits set forth
in Minnesota Statute Section 211A.12. The city’s Home Rule Charter limits campaign
contributions to $250 per year, and the State Statute limits campaign contributions to $600
in an election year.
Ms. Kennedy added that the City Attorney provided the opinion that, in this instance, the
statute governs, and a candidate may accept contributions up to $600 in an election year.
The opinion was based on the fact that when adopting the statute, the legislature
specifically referenced Minn. Stat. 410.21 and stated that the provisions of the statute
supersede any Home Rule Charter. Therefore, the contribution limits found in the state
statute govern. It was noted that the city council subsequently adopted Resolution No. 17-
153, which asked the Charter Commission to study and make a recommendation as to
whether the City Charter should be amended related to campaign finance contribution
limits.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3b) Page 3
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2018
The Charter Commission met on Oct. 24, 2017, and Dec. 6, 2017, and approved a
recommendation to amend Section 12.04 of the Home Rule Charter by adding language
that referenced the campaign contribution limits set forth in Minnesota Statute 211A.12.
Because this statute specifically supersedes any conflicting provisions in the Home Rule
Charter, the commission felt it best to eliminate the discrepancy and to simply reference
the limits set forth in statute to avoid any conflicts that may arise from future amendments
at the state level.
Councilmember Mavity raised concerns about the clause referencing anonymous
contributions, noting that $20 sets a low bar for anonymous contributions. She added that
the Home Rule Charter does not seem to align with her understanding of state statute. Ms.
Kennedy noted that the Home Rule Charter is more restrictive in that the aggregate limit is
not specifically addressed in statute.
Councilmember Mavity stated this then could be a problem, and it may need to be
addressed again, if the charter and statute remain in conflict.
Mayor Spano opened the public hearing.
Noelle Racette, 4900 Vallacher Avenue, stated it was her understanding that the city
allowed campaign contributions up to $600 during the past election cycle. She questioned
why the amendment
Mr. Harmening explained after it was determined that, in this one instance, the $600 limit
set by statute governed, all candidates for city offices were notified that the limit was in
fact $600. He stated the ordinance amendment was now being proposed to clean up the
Charter and eliminate the discrepancy. He noted that if the council would like to amend
other items contained in Sec. 12.04 of the Charter, it will need to go back to the Charter
Commission for their review and recommendation, and then come back to the council for
approval. Mr. Knutson concurred.
Mayor Spano closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Hallfin agreed with Councilmember Mavity, stating that if there are
provisions that do not align with the state statute, the council will need to send this back to
the Charter Commission to work further on it. Mr. Knutson pointed out that the statute only
supersedes provision number one of Sec. 12.04, adding that he is not aware of any other
conflicts with state law. Councilmember Hallfin suggested that it be reviewed again by
council in a study session.
Councilmember Mavity also pointed out an additional discrepancy with the charter and the
statute in that credit cards can now be used for contributions, not only check, bank draft or
money order. This will also need to be updated.
Councilmember Rog stated that she supports aligning the Charter with state statute, but
added that she would like to see the focus of campaigns be less on money and possibly
consider publically funded campaigns, especially if the city is considering ranked choice
voting, as they are complementary.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3b) Page 4
Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of January 16, 2018
Councilmember Brausen stated that he supports amending the Charter as presented, noting
that the other provisions in Sec. 12.04 are confusing. He suggested that the issue be referred
back to the Charter Commission for more recommendations, noting that the city has the
authority, in most instances, to include provisions that are more restrictive than state law.
Councilmember Mavity stated that she is concerned about the timeline and wants to be sure
there will be no issues impacting upcoming elections.
Mr. Knutson stated there are currently no municipal elections planned for 2018.
Councilmember Harris stated that it is important to be in alignment with the state statute.
She added that looking further at the Charter would be fruitful.
Mr. Harmening stated that staff will follow up with the city attorney on the questions raised
prior to the second reading of this ordinance. The council could then provide separate
direction asking the Charter Commission to review the other provisions of Section 12.04,
and bring any suggested changes back to the council.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Harris to approve
the first reading of an ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Sec.
12.04 related to Campaign Finance Contributions.
The motion passed 7-0.
7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None
8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items – None
9. Communications
Mr. Harmening reminded people of the Bundled Up! Park Fun Day at Oak Hill Park on Saturday
January 20 from 12-4 p.m.
Mayor Spano announced that the Minnesota Wild will hold a practice session on February 11 from
11–11:45 a.m. at the ROC. The exhibition practice is free and open to the public. He thanked the
Wild and the city’s Operations and Recreation Department for this opportunity.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 8:02 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Minutes: 3c
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL STUDY SESSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
JANUARY 16, 2018
The meeting convened at 8:06 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Sr. Engineering
Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Project Engineer (Mr. Wiesen), Transportation Engineer (Mr.
Manibog), Fire Chief (Mr. Koering), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
Guest: Justin Grays, Noelle Racette, Traffic Consultant Mike Spack
1. 2018 Pavement Management Project Update
Ms. Heiser, along with Mr. Wiesen, Mr. Manibog and Mr. Sullivan, presented the design of the 2018
Pavement Management Project.
Mr. Wiesen noted that this annual project rehabilitates several miles of local residential streets. Streets
to be rehabilitated this year are in Pavement Area 6, in the Elmwood, Brooklawns, and Brookside
Neighborhoods. He added that this work consists of removing and replacing existing bituminous
pavement and replacing portions of concrete curb and gutter as needed. Additional work includes
sewer repairs and water main replacement. Mr. Wiesen also noted that staff has identified gaps in the
sidewalks, and several are under consideration as part of the project. The infill of gap sidewalk
segments is the direction of council and was feedback from the visioning process in the community in
order to increase resident’s active transportation and pedestrian safety in neighborhoods.
Mr. Harmening stated that this project is included in the City’s 2018 Capital Improvement Plan and
will be paid for using franchise fees, utility funds and General Obligation Bonds. A construction cost
estimate will be provided at the February 5 public hearing.
Mr. Manibog stated that staff conducted a listening meeting with neighbors in February regarding
traffic and access in the neighborhood. Using this feedback, staff conducted a traffic study to evaluate
the concerns brought up at the meeting. Data was collected in March to understand existing conditions
related to vehicle volumes and speeds. From this information, a temporary traffic control plan was
developed in an effort to address concerns regarding access, vehicle volumes and speeds. The
temporary traffic control plan was implemented in August, and data was collected two additional times
to measure changes in vehicle volumes and speeds. This information was used to develop the traffic
control modifications. All intersections were analyzed for additional stop signs, and none are
recommended at this time.
Councilmember Miller left the meeting at 8:23 p.m.
Mr. Manibog stated that traffic control recommendations are: two traffic circles, with yield sign
control; pavement closing behind Aldersgate Church; an all-way stop at Oxford and Zarthan; and three
curb extensions. Mr. Manibog also noted that parking modifications are recommended at 36th Street
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3c) Page 2
Title: Special Study Session Minutes of January 16, 2018
and Brunswick, near the Nordic Ware and Johnny Pops buildings. In addition the crosswalk at the
west leg of 36th Street and Alabama would be marked and signed.
Councilmember Mavity asked if the street would be narrowed for the crosswalk, and Ms. Heiser
confirmed this.
Mr. Manibog also noted that the two-ton per axel weight limit signage will be removed because it no
longer applies. He stated that these streets can now handle this weight, which includes school buses,
landscaping vehicles, garbage trucks, UPS and Fed Ex trucks. Mr. Manibog stated that the next
neighborhood open house related to the project will be held January 17, and the public hearing is set
for February 5, 2018.
Councilmember Mavity thanked staff for their hard work on this project, noting it is the most extensive
methodical research that has been done. She added that she has spoken to many people in the
neighborhood, adding that the process has been very transparent, with much input from neighbors.
Councilmember Mavity stated that neighbors have asked for a living streets program, and with help
from the Environment and Sustainability Commission, this is being presented. She added that some
residents perceive that narrow streets are more dangerous, adding it would be beneficial for the city to
show data and evidence to residents related to safety that comes when streets are narrowed.
Councilmember Mavity added that she has concerns about cars sliding through intersections (e.g., at
Zarthan Avenue) and would like staff to address this with neighbors, as well. She also asked that staff
look at the sidewalks at Dakota, Goodrich and Colorado Avenues, adding that she wants to be sure
improvements on these streets make sense. Councilmember Mavity stated she appreciated staff’s
creativity in finding ways to save trees in this area, noting the beautiful canopies on these streets. She
added that she approves of the crosswalk and sidewalk at Nordic Ware but has questions on the parking
restrictions there since there are often weekend events at the Depot.
Mayor Spano noted, however, that if truck delivery to Nordic Ware is the reason for the parking
restrictions, this will not be a concern on weekends.
Ms. Heiser noted that residents’ concerns are that cars parked on the curve near Johnny Pops can be
dangerous. She stated that the proposed parking restrictions will formalize the self-restricted parking
there now and satisfy residents’ and business-owners’ concerns.
Councilmember Brausen stated he approves of the plan.
Councilmember Rog asked how many of the sidewalks in the city are city maintained or resident
maintained. Ms. Heiser stated that about half of the sidewalks in the city are resident maintained.
Councilmember Rog stated that residents have had concerns that narrowing the streets make them
look uneven in relation to homes and yards. She also asked why sidewalks will be 5 feet wide instead
of 4 feet wide. Ms. Heiser stated that at least 5 feet is needed for two people to comfortably pass on
the sidewalk. Additionally, snow removal equipment is 5 feet wide, and also ADA requirements call
for at least 5 feet. She added that in order to save a tree, the sidewalks have been narrowed for a short
distance.
Councilmember Harris stated that she appreciates the emphasis on living streets and is happy to see it
come to fruition, especially after spending time on the Environment and Sustainability Commission.
She added that she appreciated staff’s very thorough work on details, including cost per linear foot.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 3c) Page 3
Title: Special Study Session Minutes of January 16, 2018
Mayor Spano stated that the Brunswick and Brookview intersection can become slippery, and the
temporary traffic circle with stop signs was confusing. He stated that unless this was going to be
marketed in a different way, it may be prone to accidents. Ms. Heiser said that staff agrees with the
Mayor on this point. Mayor Spano also stated concern about the sight lines at Brookview and Alabama,
asking if parking could be restricted at that intersection. Mr. Manibog stated that staff will look at this
as a part of our Traffic Committee agenda and make recommendations separate from the Pavement
Management Project.
Mayor Spano asked if staff knows how many trees were lost where the sidewalk has been cut around
them. Ms. Heiser stated she was not aware of any. Mayor Spano asked if the city is doing anything to
help these trees survive. Mr. Sullivan stated that ahead of construction, they are injected with nutrients
to enhance root growth. He added that neighbors are also encouraged to water trees as much as
possible.
Councilmember Mavity asked if there are more porous materials that can be used, to allow for more
infiltration for trees. Ms. Heiser stated that the sidewalks are concrete, but a compost mix is used for
boulevards for better infiltration and root growth. Additionally, equipment is never stored on
boulevards.
Councilmember Hallfin stated that he agreed with the recommendations for Oxford and asked Chief
Koering for his feedback relating to the fire station. Chief Koering stated that he sees future traffic
concerns related to access, particularly when light rail is open in that area. He stated that he also
supports the plan for Oxford and believes it will be safer.
Mr. Harmening noted that Mr. Pires will present at a future study session regarding the status of fiber
conduit installation. Doing it now would save money. He stated that work on the project will be done
May through November, 2018.
Mr. Harmening also pointed out that it will be important for residents to sign up for city project
information updates, in order to keep well-informed.
The meeting adjourned at 9:41 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Approval of City Disbursements
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the
period of December 23, through January 26, 2018.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council desire to approve City disbursements in
accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter?
SUMMARY: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the City Council
to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check
and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Review and approval of the information
follows the City’s Charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal
stewardship.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: City Disbursements
Prepared by: Kari Mahan, Accounting Clerk
Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
855.00 EARL ANDERSEN INC INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
855.00
799.001-800 RADIATOR & A/C GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
799.00
425.003RD LAIR SKATEPARK SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
425.00
29.96A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
29.96
1,455.84AA BATTERY COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,455.84
3,500.00ABDIRAHMAN SAGAL EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
3,500.00
59.61ABELSON, SHARON NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
59.61
54.57ABERNATHY, LISA ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
54.57
225.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
830.44ACCURATE RADAR SPECIALTIES POLICE G & A REPAIRS
830.44
31,178.00ACOUSTICS ASSOCIATES INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
31,178.00
57,513.68ADVANCED DISPOSAL SERVICES SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS YARD WASTE SERVICE
43,589.68SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL YARD WASTE SERVICE
101,103.36
290.00ADVANCED ENG & ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS INC WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
290.00
173,153.20AECOM INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 2
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
173,153.20
566.05AIM ELECTRONICS RECREATION OUTDOOR CENTER OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
566.05
124.03ALBRECHT, MARY PROSECUTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
124.03
494.00ALL CITY ELEVATOR INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
494.00
370.55ALL ELEMENTS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
370.55
1,500.00ALLDATAVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,500.00
7,883.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
7,883.00
2,664.99ALLSTREAMIT G & A TELEPHONE
2,664.99
150.00ALPHA VIDEO AND AUDIO INC TV PRODUCTION REPAIRS
150.00
356.40ALTEC INDUSTRIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
388.50GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
744.90
17,117.90AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
17,117.90
840.84AMERICAN TIME FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
840.84
79.00AMERICAN TRAFFIC SAFETY SERVICES ASSOC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
79.00
1,455.00AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
1,455.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 3
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,219.34APACHE GROUP OF MINNESOTA REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,219.34
1,500.00-AQUA LOGIC INC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
30,000.50PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
28,500.50
575.00ARCTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
575.00
252.00ART SPARK LLC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
252.00
348.00ASCAPPERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
348.00
406.97ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
406.97
1,331.90ASPEN MILLS OPERATIONS UNIFORMS
1,118.00EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
2,449.90
15,194.00ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
15,194.00
250.00ATOMPOLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
250.00
50.68ATOMIC RECYCLING FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
50.69PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
50.69WATER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
50.69VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
202.75
230.61BADER MICHAEL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
230.61
121.18BAKKEN SANDRA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
121.18
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 4
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
639.49BARKER, BOB COMPANY POLICE G & A JAIL SUPPLIES
639.49
48.15BARKER, EMILY SOLID WASTE G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
48.15
3,977.15BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,977.15
30.00BARNARD KEVIN INSPECTIONS G & A RENTAL HOUSING
30.00
20,287.00BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MGMT COMMISSIONSTORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
20,287.00
19.36BASSI, GLYNNE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
19.36
16.65BATTERIES + BULBS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
16.65
921.00BEACON ATHLETICS ORGANIZED REC G & A OTHER
921.00
125.00BEAM BRADEN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
125.00
83.45BECCHETTI JUDY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
83.45
666.00BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
96.43REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
762.43
3,891.66BEDFORD TECHNOLOGY LLC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
3,891.66
250.00BENTZ BRIANA & TOM GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
250.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 5
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
500.00BG CONSULTING INC ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
500.00
1,200.00BIRCHWOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,863.01NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,063.01
349.00BMIREC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES
349.00
2,500.00BOLLIG & SONS ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC
2,500.00
9,224.00BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9,224.00
450.00BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 2010A GO HIA DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES
100.002012A GO HIA DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES
184.502017A GO DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES
450.002016A GO DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES
373.502013A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES
216.002017A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES
49.502017A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES
76.502013A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES
1,900.00
741.69BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
741.69
1,000.00BROOKSIDE MINNOCO PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,000.00
1.00BROTHERS ELECTRIC INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
55.00INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL
56.00
950.00BROWNDALE NRIGHBORHOOD ASSN.NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
950.00
11.77BUDA, TOM OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
11.77
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 6
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
.95BUDGET EXTERIORS INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
83.00INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING
83.95
121.00BUDGET SIGN & GRAPHICS POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
121.00
510.00BUREAU OF CRIM APPREHENSION CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE
510.00
68.75BURKS CASEY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
68.75
785.32BUSINESS ESSENTIALS COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
785.32
60.13BWS PLUMBING HEATING & AC INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING
60.13
180.00C&E AUTO UPHOLSTERY SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
120.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
300.00
4,446.00CALHOUN TOWERS LLC OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
4,446.00
9,173.67CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES
2,173.14ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES
148.50CABLE TV G & A LEGAL SERVICES
99.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES
552.75WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12,147.06
92.34CAPITAL ONE COMMERCIAL WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
92.34
5,000.00CARL BOLANDER & SONS ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC
5,000.00
324.04CARLSON, ARTHUR J EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 7
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
324.04
4,080.00CARRINGTON TITLE SERVICES DEVELOPMENT - EDA BALANCE SHEE LAND HELD FOR RESALE
4,080.00
5,000.00CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
5,000.00
250.00CATES JOEL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
250.00
596.25CBIZ RETIREMENT PLAN SERVICES EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
596.25
115.61CDW GOVERNMENT INC IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,764.28TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,879.89
1,900.00CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,095.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
44,175.00TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
48,170.00
2,500.00CENTER FOR SOCIAL INCLUSION INC GENERAL FUND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,500.00
18,106.17CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS
4,286.33WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
130.71REILLY G & A HEATING GAS
334.62SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
1,068.54PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS
173.51WESTWOOD G & A HEATING GAS
211.25NATURALIST PROGRAMMER HEATING GAS
13,349.68REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS
37,660.81
10,600.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S OTHER RETIREMENT
10,600.00
1,666.92CENTURY FENCE COMPANY PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
1,666.92
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 8
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
299.45CHET'S SHOES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
299.45
128.94CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
142.70FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
422.58VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
694.22
155.11CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT
259.00ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,530.22ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
490.13ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE
135.20HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES
120.37HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
465.69HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
708.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION
162.35HUMAN RESOURCES CITE
10.00HUMAN RESOURCES TRAVEL/MEETINGS
73.09HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE
98.76COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
195.00COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
287.22COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
43.40COMM & MARKETING G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES
76.67HUMAN RIGHTS PRINTING & PUBLISHING
20.00IT G & A TRAINING
324.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
39.00ASSESSING G & A MEETING EXPENSE
751.49MEETINGSGENERAL SUPPLIES
250.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
44.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING
1,535.22FACILITIES MCTE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
34.99POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
461.74POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
25.00POLICE G & A TRAINING
1,269.20POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
5.89NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
127.14OPERATIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES
448.07OPERATIONSOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
610.12OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
536.25OPERATIONSUNIFORMS
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 9
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
27.95OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS
1,180.58OPERATIONSTRAINING
1,934.39OPERATIONSSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
123.49OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
153.05INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.00INSPECTIONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82.90ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
51.54ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
145.50ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
76.85CABLE TV G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES
19.00FRANCHISE ADMINISTRATION MEETING EXPENSE
599.90TV PRODUCTION NON-CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
59.95TV PRODUCTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
31.96CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
52.90WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
70.77WATER UTILITY G&A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES
153.96SOLID WASTE G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
166.03ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY GENERAL SUPPLIES
120.00ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,335.07TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
172.34CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT
91.17ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
264.00ORGANIZED REC G & A ADVERTISING
343.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING
23.54ADULT PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
31.68SOFTBALLGENERAL SUPPLIES
294.34SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
297.33HOLIDAY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
768.00PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
566.19WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES
16.16PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
73.16PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING
8.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A TRAINING
105.25TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
487.46WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
119.99WESTWOOD G & A SMALL TOOLS
155.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
316.44REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
20.00REC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES
95.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
22,126.16
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 10
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
623.07CLAREY'S SAFETY EQUIPMENT INC OPERATIONS REPAIRS
623.07
213.47CLARKE LISA ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
213.47
255.00CLUTTER CHARLES GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
255.00
13,882.00COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES
13,882.00
9,765.00COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
9,765.00
59.02COMCASTOPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
23.24OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
321.55WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
403.81
2,373.08COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,373.08
16,578.58COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
16,578.58
765.00CONRAD, KEVIN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
765.00
186.47CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
186.47
124.80CONWAY MARY KAY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS PROGRAM REVENUE
124.80
7,443.50CORNERHOUSEPOLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
7,443.50
8,750.00CORNERSTONE ADVOCACY SERVICE POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8,750.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 11
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,150.80CORPORATE MECHANICAL PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
444.00REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
2,594.80
10,530.00COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10,530.00
750.11CREATIVE PRODUCT SOURCING INC - DARE DARE PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
750.11
21.16CREEKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
21.16
52.00CREW2INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING
52.00
29.58CROWE CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING
29.58
54.95CROWN MARKING INC.COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
10.70OPERATIONSUNIFORMS
65.65
75.00CRYSTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE
75.00
232.76CUB FOODS POLICE G & A JAIL SUPPLIES
36.91POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE
24.40JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE
294.07
199.98CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
199.98
17,418.94D&B POWER ASSOCIATES INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
17,418.94
39.68DAHLSTROM SALLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
39.68
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 12
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
200.00DAKOTA CO TECH COLLEGE PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING
200.00
5,882.30DALCO ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
238.15REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
6,120.45
76.97DELEGARD TOOL CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SMALL TOOLS
76.97
288.75DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
288.75
2,328.49DEPT EMPLOYMENT & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTEMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A UNEMPLOYMENT
2,328.49
12,624.00DINIUS FENCE LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
12,624.00
711.63DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,453.80REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
2,165.43
1,475.01DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE
2,916.25COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
4,391.26
169.00DORGLASS INC INSPECTIONS G & A BUILDING
169.00
44.05DOUGHTY, ANNIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
44.05
65.00DUBE, JIM INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSES
65.00
23.54DUNLAP, REG COMM & MARKETING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
23.54
280.00EARTH RATED PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
280.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 13
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
246.76ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES
246.76
130.00EDINA U10 A WHITE ROC ICE RENTAL (Non-Taxable)RENT REVENUE
130.00
191.82EDSTROM, JENNIE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
191.82
9,823.73EGANSEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
277.50GENERAL REPAIR BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
10,101.23
397.50EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ESCROWS PLACE
2,451.25ESCROWSPLATIA PLACE
2,040.002010B/2017A UTIL REV BONDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
300.002010B/2017A UTIL REV BONDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
660.002010B/2017A UTIL REV BONDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,848.75
138.57EISOLD, JASON ENTERPRISE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
138.57
5.50ELECTRIC FIRE & SECURITY INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
247.50INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL
253.00
23,535.00ELECTRO MECHANICAL CONTRACTING INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
23,535.00
4,144.56ENTERPRISE FM TRUST EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT
4,144.56
1,148.94ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,148.94
1,350.00ESCAPE FIRE PROTECTION LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
14,900.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
16,250.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 14
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
214.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
214.00
1,246.00EVERGREEN LAND SERVICES CO STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,246.00
1,442.33EXPRESSIMAGESOLID WASTE G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
1,442.33
490.06FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
358.52FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
848.58
3.00FASTENAL COMPANY PATCHING-PERMANENT SMALL TOOLS
70.61SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS
352.05GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
425.66
48.61FEDEXHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
35.97POLICE G & A POSTAGE
84.58
499.50FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
499.50
520.04FERRELLGASARENA MAINTENANCE MOTOR FUELS
520.04
3,500.00FETTIG MARISSA EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
3,500.00
778.18FIRE SAFETY USA INC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
778.18
64.00FIRST ADVANTAGE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
64.00
11.13FISHER, JON GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
12.63POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
23.76
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 15
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
28.41FLECK, JAMIE WINTER BREAK GENERAL SUPPLIES
28.41
245.50FLEX COMPENSATION INC EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
245.50
59.39FOLLAND R WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
59.39
21.40FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
21.40
20.87FOSTER, ALISON ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
20.87
23.26FRANK STEVEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
23.26
10.98FRATTALONE'S/ST. LOUIS PARK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
10.98
50.30G & K SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
50.30
4,170.29GALLS, LLC - DBA UNIFORMS UNLIMITED POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
110.00POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT
4,280.29
255.00GILBERT NEIL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
255.00
243.69GOLDBERG MICHAEL COMM & MARKETING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
243.69
216.00GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
216.00
748.66GORDON KAITLIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
748.66
16,000.00GR MECHANICAL MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 16
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
16,000.00
125.62GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
603.08WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
113.82VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
842.52
19.67GRANDLUND STEVEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
19.67
300.00GREENE LISA CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
300.00
505.68GROUP HEALTH INC - WORKSITE EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A HEALTH INSURANCE
505.68
23.78GROUWS MICHAEL NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23.78
200.00GYM WORKS INC OPERATIONS REPAIRS
200.00
30.00HAFNER JOSEPH INSPECTIONS G & A LICENSES
30.00
33.67HALLFIN, STEVE ADMINISTRATION G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
33.67
35.00HAMBLET, JODIE INSPECTIONS G & A RENTAL HOUSING
35.00
338.00HAMILTON, MIKE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
338.00
1,600.00HAMLINE UNIVERSITY TRAINING SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
1,600.00
255.00HANDEL KATHY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
255.00
675.00HANSEN, ERIC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 17
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
675.00
33,112.06HARDRIVES INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
23,074.31CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
56,186.37
3,617.87HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
3,617.87
425.00HCMCPOLICE G & A TRAINING
425.00
624.00HEALTHPARTNERSPOLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
6,299.00OPERATIONSHEALTH & WELLNESS
6,923.00
66,609.00HEITMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC ESCROWS GENERAL
66,609.00
448.00HENNEPIN COUNTY FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
448.00
20.00HENNEPIN COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER POLICE G & A LICENSES
20.00
125.00HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER OPERATIONS TRAINING
125.00
94.50HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
94.50
2,363.44HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
6,604.95POLICE G & A JAIL/DETENTION SERVICES
2,077.54OPERATIONSRADIO COMMUNICATIONS
2,899.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,899.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,798.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11,596.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
249.52PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
34,487.45
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 18
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,488.20HENRICKSENMUNICIPAL BLDG OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
63,297.75MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
65,785.95
10.56HIRST DANIEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
10.56
3,000.00HOLL JERRY OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,000.00
1,044.32HOLM AUSTIN EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
1,044.32
5,000.00HOME 360 LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
5,000.00
3.25-HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
12.25ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
21.72SANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS
132.08WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
1,918.45MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
33.44PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
165.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS
23.69PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
338.94PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
118.10PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
87.60PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,848.99
375.00HONEY & RYE BAKEHOUSE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
375.00
843.19HOPKINS AUTO BODY INC UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
843.19
56.32HOPKINS, CITY OF JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE
56.32
83.46HOPPE, MARK ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
83.46
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 19
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
630.52HOTSY OF MN BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
630.52
15,800.00HOUSING AUTHORITY KIDS IN THE PARK RENT ASSIST OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
15,800.00
19.18HUNG LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
19.18
1,749.10I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES
1,749.10
1,225.00IACPPOLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,225.00
259.00IAFC MEMBERSHIP OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
259.00
200.00IAPMOINSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
200.00
5,129.00ICCINSPECTIONS G & A TRAINING
5,129.00
42.00ICE SKATING INST INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES
42.00
1,400.00ICMAADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,400.00
623.45IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
623.45SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
726.18SOLID WASTE G&A POSTAGE
623.45STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE
2,596.53
1,014.00INDELCOSANDING/SALTING EQUIPMENT PARTS
1,014.00
28,147.34INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #283 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
28,147.34
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 20
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
74.21INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
2,849.62GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,923.83
391.00IO SOLUTIONS HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
391.00
496.73I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
496.73
525.00ITERIS INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
525.00
2,661.36J. H. LARSON CO.FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
211.52WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
29.80SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,902.68
5,700.00J.P SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION CO LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
56,914.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
4,991.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
9,150.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
5,700.00PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
82,455.00
125.00JARES STEPHANIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
125.00
203.68JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
3,155.00OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
1,239.25OPERATIONSREPAIRS
4,597.93
110.66JERRY'S HARDWARE FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
17.98POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
24.24POLICE G & A SMALL TOOLS
17.90POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
2,470.00OPERATIONSSMALL TOOLS
7.16ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
18.41WIRING REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 21
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
22.22WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
66.23PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
14.39PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS
32.25PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
9.52GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,810.96
2,825.00JOBS FOUNDATION/TECH DUMP SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
103.55VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
2,928.55
4,400.00JOBSINMINNEAPOLIS.COM HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
4,400.00
4,500.00JOE'S SEWER SERVICE INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
4,500.00
4,771.50JUGS SPORTS INC ORGANIZED REC G & A OTHER
4,771.50
42.76KASIC, CATHRYN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
42.76
503.08KELLER, JASMINE Z EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS
503.08
5,043.95KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS ENCORE (BADER DEV/ASAP)
1,340.00ESCROWSPLATIA PLACE
6,383.95
37.50KENNY STEVEN P GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
37.50
1,100.00KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP LLC HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,100.00
67.50KIDCREATE STUDIO LITTLE TOT PLAYTIME OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
67.50
1,175.25KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
100.00WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 22
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
202.50INSTALLATIONOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,477.75
78,663.85KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
78,663.85
50.00KOHL JEFFREY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
50.00
25,979.52KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
25,979.52
298.75KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
350.50REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
649.25
575.00KROOG, RACHAEL NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
575.00
404.70KRUGE-AIR INC BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
404.70
122.30LAKES GAS CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
122.30
33.23LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
33.23
2,744.00LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES
2,744.00
16.84LAW ENFORCEMENT TARGETS INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
16.84
138.60LAWSON PRODUCTS INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
138.60
239,252.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l exp
108,642.00UNINSURED LOSS B/S PREPAID EXPENSES
347,894.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 23
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1.00LISTIAK MICHAEL & ANNE INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
55.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING
56.00
230.19LITIN PAPER, PACKAGING & CONVERTING POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
230.19
1,480.47LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,480.47
12,044.54LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES
12,044.54
804.45LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
804.45
71,740.00LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES
40,890.96TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
112,630.96
341.87LOMBARDI, JIM ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
341.87
76.72LUBBERS KARIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
76.72
2,953.76LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
180.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
3,133.76
1,210.37MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,210.37
9.63MAGNUSON, ASHLEY ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
9.63
100.00MAHCOINSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
100.00
75.00MALONEY, DANIEL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
75.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 24
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
45.00MAMAADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
45.00
22,671.75MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
22,671.75
125.00MAPMOINSPECTIONS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
125.00
50.00MARQUEZ JEANNINE STRAND INSPECTIONS G & A TRANSFER, PENALTIES & LATE FEE
50.00
327.80MARTENS, AFTON JOINT COMM POLICE PARTNERSHIP MEETING EXPENSE
327.80
6,306.51MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
6,306.51
1,700.00MAXFIELD RESEARCH INC HOUSING REHAB G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,700.00
19.90MCCONNELL, BECKY WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
19.90
19.98MENARDSROUTINE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
9.92ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
27.85DAMAGE REPAIR OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
119.08WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
386.25PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
41.93WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
40.73FAMILY PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES
29.58WINTER BREAK GENERAL SUPPLIES
113.94REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
24.36REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
813.62
128.40MERKLEY, SCOTT PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
128.40
12,689.00METRO CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 25
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
12,689.00
544.00METRO VOLLEYBALL OFFICIALS ASSOC. VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
544.00
36,902.25METROPOLITAN COUNCIL INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
986,893.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA BALANCE SHEE DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
950.00SEWER UTILITY G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
341,727.67OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
1,366,472.92
124.96MICRO CENTER TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
124.96
250.00MID-STATES ORGANIZED CRIME INFO CENTER POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
250.00
380.70MINNEAPOLIS FINANCE DEPT PAWN FEES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
380.70
75.00MINNESOTA AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
75.00
143.00MINNESOTA CHIEFS OF POLICE ASSOCIATION POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
143.00
477.34MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS
477.34
100.00MINNESOTA CIT OFFICER'S ASSOCIATION POLICE G & A TRAINING
100.00
10.00MINNESOTA DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10.00
1,000.00MINNESOTA JUVENILE OFFICER ASSOC. POLICE G & A TRAINING
1,000.00
3,206.50-MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
64,690.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
61,483.50
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 26
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
140.00MINNESOTA PARK AND SPORTSTURF MANAGERSPARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING
60.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A TRAINING
200.00
400.00MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
400.00
1,200.00MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,200.00
80.00MINNESOTA SOCIETY OF ARBORICULTURE PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
210.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING
105.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A TRAINING
395.00
763.00MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC. OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
763.00
250.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
250.00
55.00MIPNNATURAL RESOURCES G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
55.00
157,794.70MMP HS OPCO CSM TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
157,794.70
44,631.23MMP PT OPCO CSM TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT
44,631.23
4,357.38MN DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
4,357.38
75.00MN NIGP VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
75.00
237.00MNFIAM BOOK SALES OPERATIONS TRAINING
237.00
1.00MNP MECHANICAL LLC INSPECTIONS G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 27
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
55.00INSPECTIONS G & A PLUMBING
56.00
15,483.13MORRIES DEALERSHIP GRANTS SOIL REMEDIATION
15,483.13
1,836.63MOTOROLAOPERATIONSREPAIRS
1,836.63
12,026.04MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS E-911 PROGRAM EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
12,026.04
250.00MPCASTREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
250.00
925.00MRA-THE MANAGEMENT ASSOC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A TRAINING
925.00
1,290.00MRPAORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
140.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
140.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
280.00ENTERPRISE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
1,850.00
460.00MRWAWATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
460.00
166.98MUELLER JORDAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
166.98
199.00MULTICHANNEL NEWS TV PRODUCTION SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
199.00
10,489.40-MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
209,788.00WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
199,298.60
32.50MUSKA ELECTRIC CO INSPECTIONS G & A ELECTRICAL
32.50
499.00NAFA INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 28
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
499.00
48.69NATHANSON, BRIDGET ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
48.69
379.40ND CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S WAGE GARNISHMENTS
379.40
3,500.00NELSON JEFFREY P.ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
3,500.00
9.12NELSON, MARK OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS
9.12
81.38NEP CORP WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
81.38
70.00NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
70.00
558.39NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,327.50WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
37.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,923.49
481.40NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
481.40
394.05NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
394.05
4,100.00NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY CENTER POLICE G & A TRAINING
4,100.00
250.00NYSTROMMUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
250.00
600.00OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
600.00
904.03OBERSCHMID BRIAN EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 29
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
904.03
264.59OESTREICH, MARK WESTWOOD G & A OTHER
368.62WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
633.21
149.22OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
36.15COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
342.75FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
119.54GENERAL INFORMATION OFFICE SUPPLIES
283.39POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
41.30POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
44.99POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
167.60OPERATIONSOFFICE SUPPLIES
226.49INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
381.15PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
6.02HOUSING REHAB G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
79.99ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY OFFICE SUPPLIES
22.99STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
22.94WESTWOOD G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
158.74WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
95.91VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
2,179.17
2,409.12OFFICE TEAM HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,155.00COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
7,569.60INSPECTIONS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,239.95PUBLIC WORKS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
15,373.67
308.98OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
308.98
140.00OMGHA SUPER MITE RANGERS ROC ICE RENTAL (Non-Taxable)RENT REVENUE
140.00
106.00ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
103.50OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
103.50ICE RENTAL NON-TAXABLE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
313.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 30
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,002.00OPC DIRECT REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,002.00
91.02OQUIST, REYNOLD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
91.02
1,000.00OSMUNDSON LAND CO. LLC ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
1,000.00
255.57OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
255.57
30.04PACHOLKE, TONY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
9.50POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
39.54
44.68PALM, KATHLEEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
44.68
29.30PARK CHRYSLER JEEP GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
29.30
144,266.11PARK CONSTRUCTION CO STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINED PERCENTAGE
35,720.31CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
179,986.42
212.33PARTSMASTERROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
212.33
1,079.00PATROL PC POLICE & FIRE PENSION G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
1,079.00
30.00PETTY CASH POLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
20.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
36.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A TRAINING
10.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A MEETING EXPENSE
40.00ENGINEERING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
19.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A LICENSES
8.39ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
50.40CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
20.21WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 31
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
31.32WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING
19.00WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES
27.12SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
20.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
17.12STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
10.00ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
77.06CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES
27.50VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LICENSES
463.12
15.55PETTY CASH - WWNC WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
15.55
3,469.58PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES
3,469.58
238.34PINC, SHANNON ENVIRONMENT & SUSTAINABILITY MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
238.34
3,043.95PINNACLE WALL SYSTEMS MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
3,043.95
56.36PLUMEY, EVAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
56.36
2,924.78POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
2,924.78
676.80PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
676.80
202.38PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
202.37WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
202.37SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
202.37STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
809.49
101.49PREMIUM WATERS INC OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
101.49
320.00PRINTERS SERVICE INC ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 32
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
320.00
291.34PWF SOLUTIONS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
291.34
1,200.00Q CONSULTING TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,200.00
12,992.00QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
12,992.00
22.61QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES
22.61
6,750.00R & R SPECIALTIES CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY
378.30ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
578.38ARENA MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
7,706.68
3,220.00RAINBOW HOLIDAY DESIGN SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
297.34SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,517.33SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,320.00SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,327.33SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
14,682.00
187.50RAINBOW TREECARE NATURAL RESOURCES G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
187.50
2,500.00RAMSEY COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
2,500.00
3,796.80RANDY'S ENVIORMENTAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
1,665.90REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
5,462.70
200.00RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT FIRE CD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
200.00
225.00REHKAMP LARSON ARCHITECTS INC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 33
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
44,190.51RESPECSTREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
44,190.51
139.05RETROFIT COMPANIES INC REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
139.05
124.03REUVERS, TERRY PROSECUTION OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
124.03
5,000.00RICE LEADERSHIP CONSULTING, ML ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
5,000.00
4,401.99RICOH USA INC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
4,401.99
1,584.87RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
1,584.87
598.45RMS RENTALS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
598.45
640.20ROBERTS JOHN COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
640.20
390.00ROGERS, KYLE BROOMBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
390.00
256.10ROSA, NATE ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
256.10
232.00ROTARY CLUB OF SLP ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
90.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
162.00POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
484.00
1,700.00RTVISION INC ENGINEERING G & A COMPUTER SERVICES
1,700.00
424.50RUN2RAISE MARKETING AND EVENTS ORGANIZED REC G & A ADVERTISING
424.50WESTWOOD G & A ADVERTISING
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 34
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
849.00
803.87RYAN, WILLIAM OPERATIONS PERA - POLICE & FIRE RELIEF
803.87
105.00SABES JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER INSPECTIONS G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
105.00
241.71SAFELITE FULFILLMENT INC UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
241.71
123.00SAFETY SIGNS CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
123.00
19.98SAM'S CLUB GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT
25.62COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
84.45POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE
5.98NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
21.12BRICK HOUSE (1324)OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,176.28WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
270.62WESTWOOD G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,604.05
50.00SANDERS, MATT GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
50.00
192.00SCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE
149.70HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION
341.70
11.00SCHMELZLE, NANCY OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
11.00
71.97SCHMITT ERIC OPERATIONS TRAINING
71.97
235.00SCHUMACHER MICHELLE INSPECTIONS G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
235.00
1,820.50SCHWAB VOLLHABER LUBRATT SERVICE CORP FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,820.50
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 35
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
35Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
22.00SEARLE, HUGO OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
22.00
69,521.23SEHSTREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
69,521.23
833.00SESACREC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES
833.00
125.00SETTIMI ASHLEY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
125.00
6,135.00SHAWN, JACK BASKETBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,135.00
18,000.00SHI INTERNATIONAL CORP TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
18,000.00
15.82SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
14.25FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
79.09POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
15.82WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
124.98
45.41SIEGEL ESTATE OF JUDITH L.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
45.41
275.00SIELAFF KATHLEEN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
275.00
842.24SIMPLEXGRINNELL LP FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
842.24
1,550.00SINGLETON INTERNATIONAL POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
1,550.00
2,480.00SIR LINES-A-LOT CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,480.00
117.21SLOANE CHARLES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 36
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
36Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
117.21
1,889.40SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNION DUES
1,889.40
160.00SNYDER ELECTRIC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
160.00
250.00SOLIE JEREMY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
250.00
11,996.00SPACK CONSULTING ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11,996.00
3,547.24SPRINTIT G & A DATACOMMUNICATIONS
3,547.24
4.41SPS COMPANIES INC ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
367.02WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
94.16STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
147.49MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
129.06PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
742.14
30,128.01SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
30,128.01
57,578.88ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB
57,578.88
1,500.00ST PAUL CITY OF POLICE G & A TRAINING
1,500.00
3,550.00STONE ARCH ORGANIZATION DEVELOPMENT HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
3,550.00
2,330.05STONEBROOKE EQUIPMENT INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,970.00ENGINEERING G & A ENGINEERING SERVICES
4,300.05
31.51STRAND, JEANNINE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 37
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
37Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
31.51
1,750.00STRATEGIC INSIGHTS CO TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,750.00
1,387.50STREICHER'S POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
49.99ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
149.99OPERATIONSUNIFORMS
92.99OPERATIONSPROTECTIVE CLOTHING
1,680.47
2,423.35SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
2,423.35
390.00SUMMIT COMPANIES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
390.00
15,770.90SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC REILLY BUDGET GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
15,770.90
1,686.38SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,686.38
2,469.46SWANSON, MITCH EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
2,469.46
2,388.25SYSKO KENNETH EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
2,388.25
TACTICAL GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT
1,045.00ERUOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,045.00
79.85TALKPOINT TECHNOLOGIES INC E-911 PROGRAM OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
79.85
12.84TAN XINCI SOLID WASTE G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
12.84
105.00TANEY MELISSA INSPECTIONS G & A RENTAL HOUSING
105.00
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 38
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
38Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
225.00TEA2MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
437.50TEPLEY BILL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
437.50
109.52TERMINAL SUPPLY CO GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
109.52
60.00TERMINIX INT GENERAL BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
60.00
456.00THE JOHN ROBERTS COMPANY COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
456.00
8,984.00THE KNOX COMPANY FIRE IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
8,984.00
15.43THE SHERWINN WILLIAMS CO WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
15.43
209.00THE SIGN PRODUCERS FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
13,440.00MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
13,649.00
700.00THIES, KEN OR MARY SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
700.00
276.41THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
276.41
890.35THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
890.35
1,401.13TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,401.13
2,471.63TKDAWATER UTILITY G&A ENGINEERING SERVICES
2,471.63
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 39
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
39Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,673.75TNEMEC COMPANY, INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,673.75
119,796.00TOWMASTERGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
119,796.00
11,300.00TOWN & COUNTRY FENCE INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
11,300.00
335.00TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
3,375.00SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,710.00
3,825.00TRAFFIC DATA INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,825.00
4,975.94TREE TRUST REFORESTATION LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
1,400.00REFORESTATIONCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
6,375.94
1,847.49TRI STATE BOBCAT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
685.51UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS
2,533.00
2,447.96TROYAK WILLIAM EMPLOYEE FLEX SPEND G&A TUITION
2,447.96
899.20TRUCK UTILITIES MFG CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
899.20
37.00TRUCK VAULT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
37.00
2,127.50TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
2,127.50
21.80TWIN CITY HARDWARE PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
21.80
1,447.96TWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,970.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 40
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
40Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
695.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,112.96
360.00UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
323.36FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
683.36
975.00ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
975.00
1,000.00UNION CONGREGATIONAL UCC HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,000.00
106.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE FLEXIBLE SPENDING B/S UNITED WAY
106.00
247.50UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
247.50
11.54UPS STORE SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
12.10VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A POSTAGE
23.64
62.92URAM NICHOLAS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
62.92
808.61US POSTAL SERVICES GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT
808.61
2,027.53USA BLUE BOOK SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,027.53
56.18VAUGHAN, JIM NATURAL RESOURCES G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
56.18
50.04VERIZON WIRELESS SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
17,089.33CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT
70.36CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE
17,209.73
327.30VIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 41
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
41Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
673.57WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,000.87
2,500.00W. H. BASS INC STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL
2,500.00
3,352.00WARNING LITES OF MN INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,300.00CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,652.00
13,456.95-WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
137,556.23SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
68,388.53SOLID WASTE COLLECTIONS RECYCLING SERVICE
62,967.30SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
255,455.11
888.12WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
888.12
251.14WAYSIDE RECOVERY CENTER HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
251.14
51.53WEIGEL, GREG FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
51.53
294.26WEST, JASON ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
294.26
275.00WIEBE S.J.GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
275.00
24,740.00WILLMAR WOOD PRODUCTS MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
24,740.00
126.62WILMO KIMBERLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
126.62
233.42WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
233.42
32.90WM H MCCOY PETROLEUM FUELS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 42
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
42Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
32.90
51.14WOLFE JEANNE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
51.14
46.01WOOD, ANDREA COMM & MARKETING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
46.01
40.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES
450.00WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES
490.00
4,290.00WSB ASSOC INC ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
6,029.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
22,108.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
821.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
33,248.00
16,951.77XCEL ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
23.82OPERATIONSEMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
43,005.22PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
1,672.83REILLY BUDGET ELECTRIC SERVICE
4,152.22SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
2,199.51STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
8,373.31PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
38.58BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE
62.90WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE
517.13WESTWOOD G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
20,631.84REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE
97,629.13
3,000.00YANA ROYTBURG & SLAVA SLOBODYANYUK ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
3,000.00
2,100.00YESHIVA OF MINNEAPOLIS ZONING ZONING/SUBDIVISION
2,100.00
1,727.00YTS COMPANIES LLC TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
1,727.00
32,783.44Z SYSTEMS INC TV PRODUCTION OFFICE FURNITURE & EQUIPMENT
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 43
1/29/2018CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 11:29:16R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
43Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
1/26/201812/23/2017 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
32,783.44
60.10ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
12.40WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
57.95PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
48.85VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
179.30
Report Totals 5,027,720.90
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of City Disbursements Page 44
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution for a Limited Use Permit with the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) for a pedestrian trail and bikeway within the
Right-of-Way of Highway 7 along Wooddale Avenue.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to proceed with
modifications to the Wooddale Bridge over Highway 7?
SUMMARY: The City initiated the widening of the Wooddale bridge deck by about 7 feet on
each side to allow additional space for and enhancements to the pedestrian and bicycle facilities
across the bridge. This widens the sidewalks on the bridge deck to approximately 12 feet and
sidewalks off the bridge to 10 feet. In addition, it pulls the concrete parapet walls back to provide
better sight lines for drivers as they approach Wooddale Avenue from the Highway 7 ramps.
The new bridge cross section will include: four lanes of traffic across the bridge, a left turn lane
for the Highway 7 entrance ramps, 12 foot wide sidewalks on both sides of the bridge, and two 6
foot wide bike lanes. The improvements to the bike and pedestrian facilities require a Limited Use
Permit with MnDOT for the construction, operation and maintenance of these facilities as shown
in the attached Exhibit A.
This agreement continues the existing City maintenance responsibilities for snow removal on the
sidewalks adjacent to Wooddale Avenue.
FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION: The estimated total project cost for the modifications to the
Wooddale Bridge is estimated at $2.45 million. The funding for this project is from available tax
increment funds from the Elmwood TIF District
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Resolution
Limited Use Permit # 2706-0192
Exhibit A – Limited Use Permit Area
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Engineering Project Manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: The construction of the Southwest Light Rail Transit (SWLRT) line and the
Wooddale LRT Station will result in corridor modifications along Wooddale Avenue that include
the installation of traffic signals at the Highway 7 ramp terminals, modifications to the intersection
of Wooddale Avenue at the South Service Road, and the construction of an underpass for the
Regional trail crossing at Wooddale.
In 2015 staff hired the consulting firm of Short Elliott Hendrickson (SEH) to help explore ways to
leverage the programmed improvements of SWLRT to enhance pedestrian and bicyclist safety,
traffic operations, and allow for future growth of the Wooddale corridor. In late October of 2015
the City convened a design workshop that was attended by staff from SWLRT, MnDOT, Hennepin
County, and the City. In addition, the PLACE development team and our consultant SEH were in
attendance. The desired outcome from this workshop was to find a cost effective solution that
balances the needs of all users of this multimodal corridor with a high level of safety and livability.
Since that time, the SWLRT project has completed final plans and the city and PLACE
Development have finalized that projects site layout. Construction of SWLRT has been delayed
again and is now expected to begin in late 2018 or early 2019. Staff will coordinate the timing
and scope of the Wooddale Bridge improvements with the construction activities of the SWLRT.
However, it now looks like SWLRT construction at this location may not start until 2019. Staff
believes there is no advantage to waiting until SWLRT is approved and under construction to begin
the bridge widening.
Staff has engaged SEH to complete final design plans and receive approvals from MnDOT for the
modifications to the Wooddale Bridge over Highway 7. The improvements are intended to
construct safe and comfortable pedestrian and bicycle facilities across the bridge and to increase
sight lines for vehicles at the ramp terminals.
Project Scope:
The project initiated by the City will include widening of the bridge deck by about 7 feet on each
side. This widening will allow additional space for and enhancements to the pedestrian and bicycle
facilities across the bridge. In addition, it pulls the concrete parapet walls back to provide better
sight lines for drivers as they approach Wooddale Avenue from the Highway 7 ramps.
The new bridge cross section will include; four lanes of traffic across the bridge, a turn lane for
the Highway 7 entrance ramps, 12 foot wide sidewalks and 6 foot wide bike lanes.
The project will also add landscaping at strategic locations that will soften the feel of the corridor
and compliment the SWLRT Wooddale Station and PLACE development.
Construction Sequencing:
The construction sequencing and impacts to the corridor during construction are still being
finalized. The intent of the design team is to keep half of the bridge open while the other half is
being worked on. The expectation is that one lane of traffic in each direction and one sidewalk
will be open at all times.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7
Elements not in the current Project Scope:
The bridge modifications discussed above will address many of safety concerns that currently exist
in this corridor. However, the signalization of the ramp terminals is currently part of the SWLRT
design and budget. The expectation is that the bridge modification work by the City will be
completed by late 2018. The schedule for SWLRT to install the traffic signals is still unknown.
Staff will continue to advocate to SWLRT and their contractor to install the signals as soon as
possible. Due to the continued delays in the SWLRT construction schedule it is possible that the
signals may not be installed until 2021 or 2022.
Schedule:
Due to delays with the MnDOT review and approval process the schedule for this project has
shifted approximately 4-6 weeks. The revised schedule is shown below.
Final Roadway and Bridge Plans late January 2018
Open Bids March 2018
Award Construction Contract March or April 2018
Construction April to Sept. 2018
Next Steps:
As part of the SWLRT project the City will need to enter into an agreement with MnDOT to assign
ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the signals proposed as part of their project. This
agreement will be brought to the Council at an upcoming meeting later this year. The City has a
number of similar agreements with MnDOT for signals throughout town.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Page 4
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
RESOLUTION FOR A LIMITED USE PERMIT
WITH THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR A PEDESTRIAN TRAIL IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY OF
TRUNK HIGHWAY 7 AT WOODALE AVENUE
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park is a political subdivision, organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has approved a plan to construct
a pedestrian trail in the right-of-way of Trunk Highway 7 to promote the orderly and safe crossing
of the highway; and
WHEREAS, the State of Minnesota, Department of Transportation requires a Limited Use
Permit for the construction and utilization of said pedestrian trail.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park hereby enters into a Limited Use Permit with the State of Minnesota, Department of
Transportation for the following purposes:
To construct, operate and maintain a pedestrian trail within the right-of-way of Trunk
Highway 7 (TH 7 = 012) of the State of Minnesota along Wooddale Ave. The City of St.
Louis Park shall construct, operate and maintain said trail in accordance with the Limited
Use Permit granted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor and the City
Manager are authorized to execute the Limited Use Permit and any amendments to the Permit.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 1 of 6 LU1001 1/31/2018
STATE OF MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
LIMITED USE PERMIT
C.S. 2706 (T.H. 7)
County of Hennepin
LUP # 2706-0192
Permittee: City of St. Louis Park
Terminates: 11/16/2027
In accordance with Minnesota Statutes Section 161.434, the State of Minnesota, through its
Commissioner of Transportation, (“MnDOT”), hereby grants a Limited Use Permit (the “LUP”) to City
of St. Louis Park, (“Permittee”), to use the area within the right of way of Trunk Highway No. 7 as
shown in red on Exhibit "A", (the “Area”) attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. This
Limited Use Permit is executed by the Permittee pursuant to resolution, a certified copy of which is
attached hereto as Exhibit B.
Non-Motorized Recreational Trail
The Permittee's use of the Area is limited to only the constructing, maintaining and operating a
nonmotorized recreational trail ("Facility") and the use thereof may be further limited by 23 C.F.R. 652
also published as the Federal-Aid Policy Guide.
In addition, the following special provisions shall apply:
SPECIAL PROVISIONS
1.TERM. This LUP terminates at 11:59PM on 11/16/2027 (“Expiration Date”) subject to the right
of cancellation by MnDOT, with or without cause, by giving the Permittee ninety (90) days
written notice of such cancellation. This LUP will not be renewed except as provided below.
Provided this LUP has not expired or terminated, MnDOT may renew this LUP for a period of up
to ten (10) years, provided Permittee delivers to MnDOT, not later than ninety (90) days prior to
the Expiration Date, a written request to extend the term. Any extension of the LUP term will be
under the same terms and conditions in this LUP, provided:
(a)At the time of renewal, MnDOT will review the Facility and Area to ensure the Facility and
Area are compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the highway and the Facility
and Area are in good condition and repair. If, in MnDOT’s sole determination,
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7 Page 5
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 2 of 6 LU1001 1/31/2018
modifications and repairs to the Facility and Area are needed, Permittee will perform such
work as outlined in writing in an amendment of this LUP; and
(b)Permittee will provide to MnDOT a certified copy of the resolution from the applicable
governmental body authorizing the Permittee’s use of the Facility and Area for the
additional term.
If Permittee’s written request to extend the term is not timely given, the LUP will expire on the
Expiration Date.
Permittee hereby voluntarily releases and waives any and all claims and causes of action for
damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation arising from or related to any
cancellation or termination of this LUP by MnDOT. Permittee agrees that it will not make or
assert any claims for damages, costs, expenses, losses, fees and compensation based upon
the existence, cancellation or termination of the LUP. Permittee agrees not to sue or institute
any legal action against MnDOT based upon any of the claims released in this paragraph.
2.REMOVAL. Upon the Expiration Date or earlier termination, at the Permittee’s sole cost and
expense Permittee will:
(a)Remove the Facility and restore the Area to a condition satisfactory to the MnDOT District
Engineer; and
(b)Surrender possession of the Area to MnDOT.
If, without MnDOT’s written consent, Permittee continues to occupy the Area after the Expiration
Date or earlier termination, Permittee will remain subject to all conditions, provisions, and
obligations of this LUP, and further, Permittee will pay all costs and expenses, including
attorney’s fees, in any action brought by MnDOT to remove the Facility and the Permittee from
the Area.
3.CONSTRUCTION. The construction, maintenance, and supervision of the Facility shall be at no
cost or expense to MnDOT.
Before construction of any kind, the plans for such construction shall be approved in writing by
the MnDOT's District Engineer. Approval in writing from MnDOT District Engineer shall be
required for any changes from the approved plan.
The Permittee will construct the Facility at the location shown in the attached Exhibit "A", and in
accordance with MnDOT-approved plans and specifications. Further, Permittee will construct
the Facility using construction procedures compatible with the safe and efficient operation of the
highway.
Upon completion of the construction of the Facility, the Permittee shall restore all disturbed
slopes and ditches in such manner that drainage, erosion control and aesthetics are
perpetuated.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7 Page 6
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 3 of 6 LU1001 1/31/2018
The Permittee shall preserve and protect all utilities located on the lands covered by this LUP at
no expense to MnDOT and it shall be the responsibility of the Permittee to call the Gopher State
One Call System at 1-800-252-1166 at least 48 hours prior to performing any excavation.
Any crossings of the Facility over the trunk highway shall be perpendicular to the centerline of
the highway and shall provide and ensure reasonable and adequate stopping sight distance.
4.MAINTENANCE. Any and all maintenance of the Facility shall be provided by the Permittee at
its sole cost and expense, including, but not limited to, plowing and removal of snow and
installation and removal of regulatory signs. No signs shall be placed on any MnDOT or other
governmental agency sign post within the Area. MnDOT will not mark obstacles for users on
trunk highway right of way.
5.USE. Other than as identified and approved by MnDOT, no permanent structures or no
advertising devices in any manner, form or size shall be allowed on the Area. No commercial
activities shall be allowed to operate upon the Area.
Any use permitted by this LUP shall remain subordinate to the right of MnDOT to use the
property for highway and transportation purposes. This LUP does not grant any interest
whatsoever in land, nor does it establish a permanent park, recreation area or wildlife or
waterfowl refuge Facility that would become subject to Section 4 (f) of the Federal-Aid Highway
Act of 1968, nor does this permit establish a Bikeway or Pedestrian way which would require
replacement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 160.264. No rights to relocation benefits
are established by this LUP.
This LUP is non-exclusive and is granted subject to the rights of others, including, but not limited
to public utilities which may occupy the Area.
6.APPLICABLE LAWS. This LUP does not release the Permittee from any liability or obligation
imposed by federal law, Minnesota Statutes, local ordinances, or other agency regulations
relating thereto and any necessary permits relating thereto shall be applied for and obtained by
the Permittee.
Permittee at its sole cost and expense, agrees to comply with, and provide and maintain the
Area, Facilities in compliance with all applicable laws, rules, ordinances and regulations issued
by any federal, state or local political subdivision having jurisdiction and authority in connection
with said Area including the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). If the Area and Facilities
are not in compliance with the ADA or other applicable laws MnDOT may enter the Area and
perform such obligation without liability to Permittee for any loss or damage to Permittee thereby
incurred, and Permittee shall reimburse MnDOT for the cost thereof, plus 10% of such cost for
overhead and supervision within 30 days of receipt of MnDOT’s invoice.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7 Page 7
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 4 of 6 LU1001 1/31/2018
7.CIVIL RIGHTS. The Permittee for itself, successors in interest, and assigns, as a part of the
consideration hereof, does hereby covenant and agree that in the event improvements are
constructed, maintained, or otherwise operated on the Property described in this Limited Use
Permit for a purpose for which a MnDOT activity, facility, or program is extended or for another
purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits, the Permittee will maintain and
operate such improvements and services in compliance with all requirements imposed by the
Acts and Regulations relative to nondiscrimination in federally-assisted programs of the United
States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, (as may be amended)
such that no person on the grounds of race, color, national origin, sex, age, disability, income-
level, or limited English proficiency will be excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of,
or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in the use of said improvements.
8.SAFETY. MnDOT shall retain the right to limit and/or restrict any activity, including the parking
of vehicles and assemblage of Facility users, on the highway right of way over which this LUP is
granted, so as to maintain the safety of both the motoring public and Facility users.
9.ASSIGNMENT. No assignment of this LUP is allowed.
10.IN W RITING. Except for those which are set forth in this LUP, no representations, warranties,
or agreements have been made by MnDOT or Permittee to one another with respect to this
LUP.
11.ENVIRONMENTAL. The Permittee shall not dispose of any materials regulated by any
governmental or regulatory agency onto the ground, or into any body of water, or into any
container on the State’s right of way. In the event of spillage of regulated materials, the
Permittee shall notify in writing MnDOT’s District Engineer and shall provide for cleanup of the
spilled material and of materials contaminated by the spillage in accordance with all applicable
federal, state and local laws and regulations, at the sole expense of the Permittee.
12.MECHANIC’S LIENS. The Permittee (for itself, its contractors, subcontractors, its materialmen,
and all other persons acting for, through or under it or any of them), covenants that no laborers',
mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind whatsoever shall be filed
or maintained by it or by any subcontractor, materialmen or other person or persons acting for,
through or under it or any of them against the work and/or against said lands, for or on account
of any work done or materials furnished by it or any of them under any agreement or any
amendment or supplement thereto.
13.NOTICES. All notices which may be given, by either party to the other, will be deemed to have
been fully given when served personally on MnDOT or Permittee or when made in writing
addressed as follows: to Permittee at: and to MnDOT as:
Mayor State of Minnesota
St. Louis Park City Hall Department of Transportation
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7 Page 8
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 5 of 6 LU1001 1/31/2018
5005 Minnetonka Blvd Metro District Right of Way
St. Louis Park, MN 55426 1500 W. County Road B2
Roseville, MN 55113
The address to which notices are mailed may be changed by written notice given by either
party to the other.
14.INDEMNITY. Permittee shall defend, indemnify, hold harmless and release the State of
Minnesota, its Commissioner of Transportation and employees and its successors and assigns,
from and against:
(a) all claims, demands, and causes of action for injury to or death of persons or loss of or
damage to property (including Permittee's property) occurring on the Facility or connected with
Permittee's use and occupancy of the Area, regardless of whether such injury, death, loss or
damage is caused in part by the negligence of State of Minnesota or is deemed to be the
responsibility of State of Minnesota because of its failure to supervise, inspect or control the
operations of Permittee or otherwise discover or prevent actions or operations of Permittee
giving rise to liability to any person.
(b) claims arising or resulting from the temporary or permanent termination of Facility user
rights on any portion of highway right of way over which this LUP is granted;
(c) claims resulting from temporary or permanent changes in drainage patterns resulting in
flood damages;
(d) any laborers', mechanics', or materialmens' liens or other liens or claims of any kind
whatsoever filed or maintained for or on account of any work done or materials furnished; and
(e) any damages, testing costs and clean-up costs arising from spillage of regulated
materials attributable to the construction, maintenance or operation of the Facility.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7 Page 9
LUP – Standardized LUP Form Page 6 of 6 LU1001 1/31/2018
MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
By___________________________
Its
____________________________
And___________________________
Its
____________________________
By:___________________________
District Engineer
Date__________________________
APPROVED BY:
COMMISSIONER OF TRANSPORTATION
By:_______________________________
Acting Director, Office of Land Management
Date______________________________
The Commissioner of Transportation
by the execution of this permit
certifies that this permit is
necessary in the public interest
and that the use intended is for
public purposes.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7 Page 10
1/2/201811:03:53 AMS:\PT\S\Stlou\140163\5-final-dsgn\51-drawings\40-TransHwy\Exhibits\Limited Use Permit.dgnDRAWN BY:
DESIGNER:
DESIGN TEAM
CHECKED BY:
REVISIONSNO.BY DATEsht1 FILE NO.FILE:MODEL:CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MN.
T.H. 7 / WOODDALE AVE.
140163
MTT
JEO
JEO
ST. PAUL, MN 55110
3535 VADNAIS CENTER DR.
S.P. 2706-241 (TH7)
MINNESOTAINVESTORS OF MINNESO TA
INVESTO R S O F
615105
105300
5054001020102061320730210181018507402208401108
108 30110
10
10
11
11
11 CANADIAN-PACIFIC RAILROADWALKER ST.
STA. 109+17.97
NB WOODDALE AVE
END S.P. 2706-241
STA. 103+38.11
NB WOODDALE AVE
BEGIN S.P. 2706-241
AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 '50
SCALE IN FEET
{ EB EXIT RAMP INP
{ EB TH 7 INP
{ EB ENTRANCE RAMP INP
{ WB ENTRANCE RAMP INP
{ WB EXIT RAMP INP
{ SB WOODDALE AVE. INP
{ NB WOODDALE AVE. INP
{ WB TH 7 INP
{ FRONTAGE RD. INP
AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'PERIMETER 30 FT
REM 35 SF
AREA 15 SF
AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'PERIMETER 30 FT
REM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
PERIMETE
R 30 FTREM 35 SF
AREA 15 SF
PERIMETER 30 FT
REM 35 SF
AREA 15 SF
PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SF
AREA 15 SF
INP 12'
INP 11'
INP 12'
INP 6' BIKE
INP 11'
INP 11'
6' BIKE
INP 11'
INP 11'
11'
11'
6' BIKE
12.583' TRAIL
11.583' WALK
1:30 1:30
1:30
1:5
11'
11'PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SF PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
11'
11'
11'
PERIMETER 30 FT
REM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
AREA = 15 SQ'
REM = 48 SQ '
PERIMETER = 30 '
AREA = 15 SQ'
REM = 48 SQ '
PERIMETER = 30 '
PERIMETER 30 FT
REM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
11'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 '
6' BIKE AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 '13'INP 10' SHLDINP 12'INP 12'PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SF
AREA 15 SF INP 4' SHLDINP 4' SHLDINP 12'INP 12'INP 10' SHLDPERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SF AREA 15 SF
PERIMETER 30 FT REM 35 SF AREA 15 SF
INP 14'INP 14'INP 16'INP 18'INP 14'INP 14'AREA = 15 SQ'
REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 'PERIMETER 30 FT
REM 35 SF
AREA 15 SF
AREA = 15 SQ'REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 '
AREA = 15 SQ'
REM = 48 SQ 'PERIMETER = 30 '
PERIMETER 30 FT
REM 35 SF
AREA 15 SF
PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
PERIMETER 30 FT REM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
+75.8PERIMETER 30 FTREM 35 SFAREA 15 SF
10
' TRAIL
10
' TRAIL
1:5 1:10
INP 6' BIKE
11
2=5'R=5'R=
5'R=5'R2' BUFFER
2' BUFFER
+12.4
SB WOODDALE
+25.1
SB WOODDALE
+23.7
SB WOODDALE
+90.5
NB WOODDALE
+45.0
NB WOODDALE
+42.6
NB WOODDALE+25.6
NB WOODDALE
=
2
0'
R =50'RB612 C&G
B612 C&G
B624 C&G
B624 C&G
B624 C&G
B624 C&G
B612 C&G
+10.6
NB WOODDALE
B624 C&G
B624 C&G +58.8+25.0+18.9+49.8+26.9+47.9
NB WOODDALE
+17.7
SB WOODDALE
+93.9
SB WOODDALE
+55.4
SB WOODDALE
+91.2
NB WOODDALE +53.3+75.5+44.7+92.4+25.8+48.6B624 C&G
B624 C&G
+95.3
SB WOODDALE
+37.6
NB WOODDALE
=80'R=160'
R
B624 C&G
B624 C&G D412 C&G
D424 C&G
D424 C&G
+02.1
NB WOODDALE+60.5
NB WOODDALE
=45'R
=50'
R=115'R+26.7
SB WOODDALE
+99.0=20'R
=50'R
=2 5 'R=35'
R
=
3
5'R=38'R
=58'R=45'R=100'
R
D424 C&G
18'
18'
B612 C&G
+93.9
NB WOODDALE
+04.7
NB WOODDALE
+04.3
SB WOODDALE
{ TRAIL 2
{ TRAIL 1
6' BIKE
NO. 27B65
INPLACE BRIDGE
{ TRAIL 3
B624 C&G
+24.2
SB WOODDALE
+43.1
NB WOODDALE
3
3
3
3W. 35TH ST .
LIMITED USE PERMIT AREA
EXHIBIT A -
PERMIT R/W
LIMITED USE
PERMIT R/W
LIMITED USE
INP 17'
10
' TRAIL
SEE INTERSECTION DETAIL PLANS.3 10' TRANSITION BETWEEN B612 C&G AND B618 C&G.2 (PAID FOR AS 6" CONCRETE WALK).CONSTRUCT CONCRETE APPROACH NOSE PER MNDOT STD. PLATE 71131SPECIFIC NOTES:
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Resolution Approving a MnDOT Limited Use Permit – Wooddale Avenue at Hwy 7 Page 5
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to approve a contract with Hennepin County Healthcare
System that amends the original medical direction contract related to dispensing Nalaxone and or
other lifesaving interventions by St. Louis Park Fire Department EMT’s
POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
SUMMARY: This contract amends the original contract and expands the medical direction
provided by Hennepin County EMS beyond the oversight required for Nalaxone (Narcan) as
required by state statute. This updated contract also provides for medical direction covering
additional lifesaving interventions which can be administered by the Fire Department and
Community EMT visits while under medical direction. The attached contract has been reviewed
by the City Attorney.
Medical direction allows fire departments to deliver prescribed care under standing orders of a
licensed physician. The Physician resolves all issues regarding medical control including, but
not limited to, quality assurance, medical protocols and EMT training.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The fees for this contract are included in the
operating budget of the fire department
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Contract for Signatures
Prepared by: Steve Koering, Fire Chief
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
DISCUSSION
BACKGROUND: There has been a growing need to enhance the interventions that Fire
Department EMTs can deliver. Giving Firefighter EMTs the ability to provide this care will
improve customer service and improve outcomes. Discussions about adding these interventions
began a year ago and now has the complete support of Hennepin County EMS.
PRESENT CONSIDERATIONS: Currently, if an event occurs where an overdose is likely and
the patient could benefit from the administering of Naloxone, responders need to wait for Hennepin
County EMS to arrive. By placing this on all frontline fire apparatus, it is now guaranteed that
those delays will no longer be a problem. In addition to the general public, there is also a potential
exposure to our police officers who might come in contact with these opioids either during contact
with the patient or contact with the product. This could happen either in the field or the evidence
room. A dose of Naloxone will be placed in those areas to protect those employees. In addition
to Nalaxone, Fire Department EMTs will have the expanded capability to administer a variety of
medical interventions while on scene and in advance of Hennepin County EMS arrival. Covered
under this Medical Direction contract is the oversight required by state statute for the Fire
Department’s Community EMT efforts.
NEXT STEPS: The Fire Department will incorporate these skills into the quarterly EMS training
which is delivered by HCMC EMS Education. All training and implementation will be completed
by the end of 2018
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
PHYSICIAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Agreement is between HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., a public
subsidiary corporation of Hennepin County, doing business as Hennepin County Medical Center,
701 Park Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1676 (“HCMC”), and the City of St.
Louis Park (“CITY”).
WHEREAS, HCMC and CITY are committed to excellence in the provision of health care
services to the communities they serve, including: the best clinical practice delivered in a
consistent and integrated way; lowest appropriate cost to the population served; a service
experience, supported by systems and processes that focuses on the community and patients; and
a genuine caring and concern in interactions with patients, families, employees and physicians on
medical-related issues; and
WHEREAS, CITY desires to contract with HCMC to provide the services of one or more
physicians, as further specified in this Agreement, to provide leadership and expertise in the
furthering of these goals by serving as the medical director for the CITY for the services as
described in Attachment A (“Services”), hereby incorporated into this Agreement by such
reference;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual
covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency
of which are hereby acknowledged, HCMC and CITY hereto agree as follows:
1. TERM
HCMC agrees to furnish Services to CITY during the period commencing July 1, 2017
(“Effective Date”) and terminating June 30, 2018 (“Initial Term”). Thereafter the
Agreement shall automatically renew for successive one (1) year periods (“Renewal
Terms”) until terminated pursuant the cancellation conditions of the Agreement.
2. SERVICES OF ASSIGNED PROVIDER(S)
A. HCMC, through its employed physician(s) as set forth in Exhibit B (“Assigned
Provider(s)”) shall provide the Services (see Exhibit A). HCMC Assigned
Provider(s) will provide the Services for CITY at the location and on the schedule
identified in Exhibit C (“Service Site and Schedule”) hereby incorporated into this
Agreement by such reference. To the extent any Exhibit provision conflicts with
any of the terms of this Agreement, HCMC and CITY agree that the terms of this
Agreement will take precedence.
B. Assigned Provider(s) will provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement,
including the applicable Exhibits hereto, which may be amended from time to time
by the written agreement of the Parties. As appropriate, Assigned Provider(s) will
prepare records relating to all Services rendered under this Agreement and will
prepare and attend to all reports and claims in connection with such services. All
of which records, reports, and claims will belong to CITY.
C. HCMC and Assigned Provider(s) will be eligible to participate without restriction
in all applicable federal and state health care programs, including Medicare and
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 4
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
Medicaid. Assigned Provider(s) will maintain an unrestricted license to practice
medicine in the State of Minnesota, be board certified, board eligible, or its
equivalent in his or her specialty area, and be in possession of a valid Drug
Enforcement Agency registration number allowing Assigned Provider(s) to legally
prescribe and dispense controlled substances. Assigned Provider(s) will maintain
hospital medical or professional staff appointments and all clinical privileges
granted in connection therewith without restriction that may be reasonably required
in order to render the Services. HCMC will notify CITY in the event Assigned
Provider(s) fails to comply with any of the requirements described above and such
Assigned Provider(s) will cease providing the Services. HCMC and Assigned
Provider(s) will perform the Services in compliance with all applicable standards,
including the laws of the United States and the State of Minnesota and applicable
standards of professional ethics, medical practice and conduct.
D. HCMC is responsible for professional services rendered by Assigned Provider(s)
at Service Sites. CITY will not control the provision of professional services
rendered by Assigned Provider(s); provided, however, that Assigned Provider(s)
will comply with applicable standards, policies and training requirements of CITY
or service sites related to the provision of services hereunder and the operation of
Service Sites while performing services at those locations.
3. COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
As full and complete consideration for the Services provided by HCMC, and subject to the
terms and conditions of this Agreement, CITY agrees to pay HCMC in accordance with
the terms specified in Exhibit D (“Compensation”). These rates reflect fair market value
rates arrived at through arm’s length negotiations between HCMC and CITY, and the
volume of services does not exceed that which is reasonably necessary to accomplish the
commercially reasonable purposes of this Agreement. These fees are not intended to relate
to and do not, in fact, reflect the volume or value of referrals, if any, between HCMC and
CITY. Each year HCMC and CITY will negotiate the payment rate in good faith to ensure
that it remains at fair market value.
4. PAYMENT FOR SERVICES
A. Payment for Services shall be made directly to HCMC after completion of the
services on a monthly basis. HCMC shall submit to CITY a monthly claim or
invoice for the Services. Such claim/invoice shall include the following signed and
dated statement: “I declare under penalty of perjury that this account, claim, or
demand is just and correct and that no part of it has been previously paid.” Each
payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of invoice receipt.
Mail to: Hennepin County Medical Center
Attn: QB Accounts Receivable
P.O. Box 860047
Minneapolis, MN 55486
612-873-8529
AccountsReceivable@hcmed.org
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 5
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
HCMC shall send invoices to: Steve Koering, Fire Chief
St. Louis Park Fire Department
3750 Wooddale Ave. South
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
952-924-2595
skoering@stlouispark.org
B. Upon any notice of termination of this Agreement for any reason, CITY will be
obligated to make payments for services provided through an effective date of the
termination.
5. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
HCMC shall select the means, method, and manner of performing the services. Nothing is
intended or should be construed as creating or establishing the relationship of a partnership
or a joint venture between HCMC and CITY or as constituting HCMC as the agent,
representative, or employee of CITY for any purpose. HCMC is and shall remain an
independent contractor for all services performed under this Agreement.
6. INDEMNIFICATION
CITY agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless HCMC, its officials, officers, agents,
volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages,
losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees, resulting directly or
indirectly from any act or omission of CITY, a subcontractor, anyone directly or indirectly
employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable, in
the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss by reason
of the failure of CITY to perform any obligation under this Agreement. For clarification
and not limitation, this obligation to defend, indemnify and hold harmless includes but is
not limited to any liability, claims or actions resulting directly or indirectly from alleged
infringement of any copyright or any property right of another, the employment or alleged
employment of CITY personnel, the unlawful disclosure and/or use of protected data, or
other noncompliance with the requirements of the Confidential Information provisions set
forth in Section 8 hereof. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by the CITY of
any statutory or common law defenses, immunities, or limits on liability. The CITY
liability is limited to the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
HCMC agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the CITY, its officials, officers,
agents, volunteers and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments,
damages, losses, costs, or expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, resulting directly
or indirectly from any act or omission of HCMC, a subcontractor, or anyone directly or
indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be
liable, in the performance of the services required by this Agreement, and against all loss
by reason of the failure of HCMC to perform any obligation under this Agreement.
Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver by HCMC of any statutory or common law
defenses, immunities, or limits on liability. HCMC’s liability is limited to the limits on
liability established in Minnesota Statutes Chapter 466.
The statutory limits of liability for some or all of the parties may not be added together to
determine the maximum amount of liability for any party.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 6
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
7. INSURANCE
A. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 383B.923, and subject to tort liability limits for
municipalities in the State of Minnesota, Minn. Stat. § 466.01 and 466.02, HCMC
will maintain at its sole expense and for the entire period the Agreement is in force
a program of self-insurance, inclusive of coverage for professional liability claims,
in an amount currently set at five hundred thousand ($500,000) per occurrence and
One Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($1,500,000) in the aggregate.
HCMC shall also require that all Assigned Provider(s) employed by or under
contract with HCMC to render Services procure and maintain malpractice
insurance of at least at the levels referenced above, if the Assigned Provider(s) are
not covered under the program of self-insurance.
B. With respect to this Agreement, CITY agrees at all times during the term of this
Agreement, and beyond such term when so required, to have and keep in force the
following insurance coverages on an occurrence basis:
Limits
1. Commercial General Liability:
General Aggregate $2,000,000
Products—Completed Operations Aggregate 2,000,000
Personal and Advertising Injury 1,500,000
Each Occurrence—Combined Bodily
Injury and Property Damage 1,500,000
2. Workers’ Compensation and Employer’s Liability:
Workers’ Compensation Statutory
In the event that CITY should hire employees or
subcontract this work, CITY shall obtain the
required insurance.
Employer’s Liability. Bodily injury by:
Accident—Each Accident 500,000
Disease—Policy Limit 500,000
Disease—Each Employee 500,000
3. Professional Liability— Per Claim 1,000,000
Aggregate 2,000,000
C. An umbrella or excess policy over primary liability insurance coverages is an
acceptable method to provide the required insurance limits.
The above establishes minimum insurance requirements. It is the sole responsibility
of CITY to determine the need for and to procure additional insurance which may
be needed in connection with this Agreement. CITY shall submit certificates of
insurance to HCMC annually.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 7
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
D. Duty to Notify.
1. CITY shall promptly notify HCMC of any claim, action, cause of action or
litigation brought against CITY, its employees, officers, agents or
subcontractors, which arises out of the services contained in this Agreement.
CITY shall also notify HCMC whenever CITY has a reasonable basis for
believing that CITY and/or its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors,
and/or HCMC, might become the subject of a claim, action, cause of action,
criminal arrest, criminal charge or litigation arising out of and/or related to the
services contained in this Agreement. Failure to provide the notices required by
this section is a material violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
2. HCMC shall promptly notify CITY of any claim, action, cause of action or
litigation brought against HCMC, its employees, officers, agents or
subcontractors, which arises out of the services contained in this Agreement.
HCMC shall also notify CITY whenever HCMC has a reasonable basis for
believing that HCMC and/or its employees, officers, agents or subcontractors,
and/or CITY, might become the subject of a claim, action, cause of action,
criminal arrest, criminal charge or litigation arising out of and/or related to the
services contained in this Agreement. Failure to provide the notices required by
this section is a material violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement
8. CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION
All medical information concerning specific patients, derived from or obtained during the
course of the Assigned Provider(s)’ duties under this Agreement, will be treated by HCMC
and CITY as confidential so as to comply with all applicable state and federal laws and
regulations regarding confidentiality of patient records, and will not be released, disclosed
or published to any party other than as required or permitted under applicable laws.
CITY acknowledges that during the term of this Agreement, CITY may have access to
trade secrets, proprietary information, and confidential information of HCMC. CITY
agrees to protect and preserve the confidential and proprietary nature of HCMC’s
confidential and/or proprietary information and shall not disclose such information to any
other person or entity, except to the extent required to carry out the duties and
responsibilities set forth in this Agreement, or as may be otherwise required by law. Upon
the request of HCMC at any time, all copies of confidential and/or proprietary information
shall be returned to HCMC.
CITY agrees to comply with the provisions of the Minnesota Government Data Practices
Act, Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 13 (MGDPA), the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act (HIPAA), and the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health Act (HITECH), where applicable, and all other applicable state and federal
laws, rules, regulations and orders relating to data privacy or confidentiality. This
Agreement is subject to the MGDPA. Any reports, information, data, etc. given to, or
prepared or assembled by HCMC under this Agreement which the CITY requests to be
kept confidential, shall not be made available to any individual or organization without the
CITY's prior written approval. All government data, as defined in the Data Practices Act
Section 13.02, Subd 7, which is created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 8
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
disseminated by HCMC in performing any of the functions of the CITY during
performance of this Agreement is subject to the requirements of the Data Practice Act and
HCMC shall comply with those requirements as if it were a government entity. All
subcontracts entered into by HCMC in relation to this Agreement shall contain similar Data
Practices Act compliance language. HCMC agrees to promptly notify CITY if it becomes
aware of any potential claims, or facts giving rise to such claims, under MGDPA.
CITY acknowledges and agrees that classification of data under the MGDPA as “trade
secret” will be determined pursuant to applicable law. If CITY creates, collects, receives,
stores, uses, maintains or disseminates data because it performs functions of HCMC
pursuant to this Agreement, then CITY must comply with the requirements of the MGDPA
as if it were a government entity, and may be held liable under the MGDPA for
noncompliance. CITY agrees to promptly notify HCMC if it becomes aware of any
potential claims, or facts giving rise to such claims, under the MGDPA.
9. RECORDS – AVAILABILITY/ACCESS
In accordance with Medicare requirements under Section 952 of the Omnibus
Reconciliation Act of 1980 (PL 96-499) as well as any final regulations relating thereto as
may be promulgated by the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services (the “Secretary”), and to the extent that the requirements are applicable to this
Agreement, CITY shall, while this Agreement is effective and until the expiration of four
(4) years after furnishing of any services, make available, upon written request to the
Secretary, or the Comptroller General of the United States (the “Comptroller General”), or
any of their authorized representatives, a copy of this Agreement and books, documents
and records of CITY as are necessary to certify the nature and extent of the costs incurred
by HCMC for the services furnished. If CITY carries out any of the duties hereunder
through a subcontractor, with a value or cost of $10,000 or more over a twelve (12) month
period, CITY shall require subcontractor to make available upon written request to the
Secretary or Comptroller General any such books, documents and records.
10. AUDIT DISCLOSURE
The books, records, documents and accounting procedures and practices of the HCMC or
other parties relevant to this Agreement are subject to examination by the CITY and either
the Legislative Auditor or the State Auditor for a period of six (6) years after the effective
date of this Agreement.
11 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNMENTS
A. CITY binds itself, its partners, successors, assigns and legal representatives to
HCMC for all covenants, agreements and obligations contained in the contract
documents.
B. CITY shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be
performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become
due to it without the prior written consent of HCMC.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 9
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
C. HCMC shall not assign, transfer or pledge this Agreement and/or the services to be
performed, whether in whole or in part, nor assign any monies due or to become
due to it without the prior written consent of CITY.
12. MERGER AND MODIFICATION
A. It is understood and agreed that the entire Agreement between HCMC and CITY is
contained herein and that this Agreement supersedes all oral agreements and
negotiations between HCMC and CITY relating to the subject matter. All items
that are referenced or that are attached are incorporated and made a part of this
Agreement. If there is any conflict between the terms of this Agreement and
referenced or attached items, the terms of this Agreement shall prevail.
B. Any alterations, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this
Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an
amendment to this Agreement signed by HCMC and CITY.
13. TERMINATION
A. This Agreement may be terminated with or without cause by either party upon thirty
(30) day’s written notice.
B. This Agreement may be terminated by either party with cause upon default by the
other party under any material term of this Agreement and failure to cure such
default within sixty (60) days after receipt of written notice specifying the precise
nature of such default. Upon failure to cure such default, this Agreement shall be
deemed terminated without further action.
14. SURVIVAL OF PROVISIONS
Provisions that by their nature are intended to survive the term, cancellation or termination
of this Agreement include but are not limited to: SERVICES OF ASSIGNED
PROVIDER(S) (as to ownership of property); PAYMENT FOR SERVICES;
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR; INDEMNIFICATION; INSURANCE;
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION; RECORDS-AVAILABILITY/ACCESS;
TERMINATION; PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE; and GOVERNING LAW.
15. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION
In order to coordinate the services to CITY with the activities of the Hennepin HCMC
Medical Center so as to accomplish the purposes of this Agreement, HCMC’s Medical
Director of Emergency Medicine shall manage this Agreement on behalf of HCMC and
serve as liaison between HCMC and the CITY.
HCMC Contract Liaison:
Jeffrey Ho, MD, FACEP, FAAEM
Hennepin County Medical Center
Hennepin EMS
701 Park Avenue
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 10
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
Minneapolis, MN 55415
612-873-5683
Jeffrey.ho@hcmed.org
CITY Contract Liaisons:
Steve Koering, Fire Chief
St. Louis Park Fire Department
3750 Wooddale Ave. South
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
952-924-2595
skoering@stlouispark.org
16. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS
A. CITY shall comply with all applicable federal, state and local statutes, regulations,
rules and ordinances in connection with this Agreement.
B. CITY represents and warrants that neither CITY nor any provider to CITY is now
listed by a federal agency as excluded, debarred, suspended, or otherwise ineligible
to participate in federal programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, nor has any
current reason to believe that during the term of this Agreement will be so listed,
on the HHS-OIG List of Excluded Individuals/Entities or the General Services
Administration List of Parties Excluded from Federal Procurement and Non-
Procurement Programs. HCMC and CITY agree that either may terminate this
Agreement, upon notice to the other, in the event that the CITY or any provider to
CITY is listed on the HHS-OIG List of Excluded Individuals/Entities or on the
General Services Administration List of Parties Excluded from Federal
Procurement and Non-Procurement Programs.
17. NOTICES
Any notice or demand which must be given or made by a party under this Agreement or
any statute or ordinance shall be in writing, shall specifically reference “HCMC – City of
St. Louis Park Fire Department – Contract No. 6505,” and shall be sent to the following:
HCMC Contact for NOTICES:
SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGER
Hennepin County Medical Center
Supply Chain Management, BL.240
701 Park Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55415
contractadmin@hcmed.org
612-873-9672
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 11
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
CITY Contact for NOTICES:
Steve Koering, Fire Chief
St. Louis Park Fire Department
3750 Wooddale Ave. South
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
952-924-2595
skoering@stlouispark.org
or to such other address as may be designated by written notice from one Party to the other.
18. RESPONSIBILTIES OF CITY
CITY will provide and maintain such staff, equipment, supplies and facilities as HCMC
deems necessary for Assigned Provider(s)’ performance of duties hereunder. Assigned
Provider(s) will not use any such items for any purpose other than as provided by this
Agreement. CITY will regularly consult with HCMC regarding equipment, CITY and
supply needs, as well as staffing needs at the Service Site.
19. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Each party shall retain all rights, including all copyright, patent, trade secret, trademark
and other proprietary rights in any software, network programs, procedures, processes,
works, documents and inventions created or developed by it prior to entering into this
agreement or in the course of performing under the agreement, except as otherwise agreed
to in writing.
20. PROMOTIONAL LITERATURE
CITY agrees, to the extent applicable, to not use the term “HCMC” or any derivative in
any promotional literature, advertisements of any type or form or client lists without the
express prior written consent of HCMC.
21. GOVERNING LAW
The laws of the State of Minnesota without giving effect to its conflict of law principles
govern all questions and interpretations concerning the validity and construction of this
Agreement and the legal relations between HCMC and CITY and their performance. The
appropriate venue and jurisdiction for any litigation will be those courts located within
Hennepin County, State of Minnesota or in the appropriate federal court within the State
of Minnesota.
22. COUNTERPARTS AND ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE
This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original but all of which together shall constitute one and the same Agreement.
This Agreement may be executed by a party's signature transmitted by facsimile or
electronic portable document format (.pdf), and copies of this Agreement so executed and
delivered shall have the same force and effect as originals.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 12
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
23. SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the remaining
provisions are not affected or impaired in any way.
24. NON-SOLICITATION OF EMPLOYEES
CITY recognizes that HCMC has a valuable employment relationship with its employees,
and the CITY agrees not to interfere with that relationship during this Agreement or the
following twelve (12) months thereafter; and will not offer to employ, either directly or
indirectly, any staff or personnel of HCMC, or hire or otherwise engage any corporation,
partnership or other entity affiliated with such individual, without HCMC’s consent.
The CITY certifies that the person who executed this Agreement is authorized to do so on
behalf of the CITY as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions or ordinances.
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Date: _______________________ By ________________________________
Jake Spano, Mayor
Date: _______________________ By ________________________________
Tom Harmening, City Manager
HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC.,
doing business as Hennepin County Medical Center
By:
Printed Name: Derrick Hollings
Printed Title: Chief Financial Officer
Date:
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 13
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
Exhibit A
Statement of Work No. 1
This Statement of Work No. 1 is entered under and incorporated within Contract No. 6505 between
HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, INC., a public subsidiary corporation of Hennepin
County, doing business as Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Avenue South,
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1676 (“HCMC”), and the City of St. Louis Park (“CITY”).
SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED: Minnesota Statutes allow an emergency medical
responder (“EMR”) registered pursuant to Minnesota Statute 144E.27 to administer
opiate antagonists (e.g., Narcan® (Naloxone Hydrochloride)) under certain
conditions (see Minnesota Statute 151.37). Included within these conditions is that
the EMR be authorized to do so by a licensed physician under a standing order or
protocol for the EMR issued by the physician and that the EMR has training in the
recognition of signs of opiate overdose and the use of opiate antagonists. CITY
employs EMR’s and wishes to have those EMR’s authorized to administer opiate
antagonists in accordance with this statute. HCMC shall designate the Assigned
Provider(s) practicing in the field of emergency medicine to provide the services,
including training, necessary to allow the CITY’s EMR’s to administer opiate
antagonists. The Services include:
• Provide training on Narcan® administration to CITY’s EMR’s as follows:
o Each ‘session’ will be 4 hours in duration;
o The minimum number of CITY EMR’s required in order to conduct a
session is ten (10);
o The cost/tuition per participant for each ‘session’ is $65.00, which shall
be paid to HCMC by CITY;
o Training will be Minnesota Board of Peace Officer Standards and
Training (POST) approved.
• Develop quality assurance and medical protocols on the administration of
Narcan®;
• Any other services required to comply with Minnesota Statute 157.37,
Subdivision 12.
Assigned Provider(s) shall not initiate any disciplinary proceedings or become involved
with the hiring or termination of any employee of the CITY.
As part of the above Services, CITY agrees to ensure that all firefighters employed by
CITY are certified Emergency Medical Technicians and Emergency Medical Responders
in good standing with the State of Minnesota EMS Regulatory Board. CITY agrees to
make all EMS training records, patient care reports and quality assurance documents
available to Assigned Provider(s) upon his/her request. CITY shall provide timely
notification to the Assigned Provider(s) of any problems with patient care, personnel
training or the medical protocol, as well as any other unusual or troublesome EMS
occurrences to which the Assigned Provider(s) is required to provide the Services outlined
herein. CITY will allow the Assigned Provider(s) to participate in EMS activities related
to the Narcan® Administration Program to include emergency scene observations,
emergency run reviews, training and quality assurance.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 14
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
Exhibit B
Assigned Provider(s)
As of the Effective Date of the Agreement the following are the Assigned Provider(s):
1. Paul Nystrom, MD, FACEP (Primary)
2. Jeffrey Ho, MD, FACEP, FAAEM (Secondary)
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 15
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
Exhibit C
Service Site and Schedule
A. SERVICE SITE(S)
As determined and agreed upon by the parties.
B. SITE SCHEDULE
As agreed between the parties.
C. TIME COMMITMENT
As needed and agreed between the parties.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 16
Title: Updated Contract for Medical Direction with Hennepin County Healthcare System Inc.
Exhibit D
Compensation
CITY agrees to pay HCMC $1,500.00 for the Initial Term and $1,500.00 for any Renewal Terms
of the Agreement. CITY also agrees to pay to HCMC all proceeds from the cost/tuition charged
per participant for each Narcan® training session (as detailed in Exhibit A herein) conducted
during the Initial Term and any Renewal Term.
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving a Minor Amendment to
the approved Planned Unit Development.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the proposed performance center addition meet the
requirements of the zoning ordinance and Parkshore Senior Campus PUD?
SUMMARY: Parkshore Senior Campus, LLC submitted an application to amend their PUD to
construct a 2,500 square foot, one-story addition to the east side of the existing building. The
addition consists of:
•An 878 square foot performance center consisting of a stage and seating. The performance
center is for the use of its residents. It will not be open to the public.
•An 826 square foot common area that can be combined with the performance center to
increase seating, or kept separate for other activities.
•A small private dining room.
•Additional restrooms.
The project will also include a 1,140 square foot patio. The patio will include landscaping, a gas
fire pit and seating. The patio is separate from the performance center.
The Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD) is currently reviewing revisions to the plan,
and they recommend the city approve the plan with the condition that the MCWD permits be issued
prior to issuing a building permit. Their review will not impact the size or location of the building.
The proposal meets zoning requirements, and does not increase parking requirements.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Draft Resolution
Aerial Photo
Development Plans
Minnehaha Creek Watershed District Review Letter
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, Assistant Zoning Administrator
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, Planning & Zoning Supervisor
Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
DISCUSSION
Zoning Review: The Parkshore Apartment building is guided in the Comprehensive Plan for High
Density Residential and the property is zoned RC – High-Density Multiple-Family Residence.
The two other parcels in the Silvercrest campus have the same designation in the Comprehensive
Plan Map and the Official Zoning Map.
The proposed Minor Amendment has a minimal effect on surrounding properties. The addition
will be visible from Wolfe Park, but not from the Park Center Blvd. The proposed addition is
consistent with the existing building setbacks in the PUD, and conforms with all other zoning
regulations. The following is a brief summary of the zoning review:
Setbacks: Setback modifications are allowed through the use of a PUD. In the case of the
Parkshore Senior Campus building, there were setback modifications approved as part of the
original PUD. On the east side of the building, the setback was modified from 40 feet to 10 feet.
The proposed setbacks for the entire building are as follows:
The proposed theater addition will be setback the same distance from the east property line as the
last addition completed in 2010 which was an indoor pool addition.
PUD Setback
requirements
North
(side yard)
West
(front yard)
South
(side yard)
East
(rear yard)
Current
0’ – enclosed
connection to
assisted living
building
10.8’ – parking
ramp
24.6’
40’
Proposed
Addition
16’ N/A N/A 11.2’
(2010 pool addition
is setback 11.2’)
The proposed changes to the east side of the Parkshore building would primarily impact the amount
of turf grass on this side of the building. The area between the proposed theater addition and the
2010 pool addition will be improved with the addition of a new patio, including an outdoor fire
pit.
The 2010 indoor pool addition is located approximately 22 feet from the trail located in Wolfe
Park. The proposed Theater addition will also be located approximately 22 feet from the trail.
Architectural Materials: The proposed addition will match the existing building materials. The
two exterior materials for the addition are brick and glass, both Class I materials. The existing
building is composed almost completely of brick and glass.
Parking: The proposed modifications and expansion to the building do not change the required
parking.
Landscaping & Tree Replacement: The building addition will require the removal of eight trees.
The eight trees will have to be replaced to meet the minimum trees required for the PUD
landscaping plan. Additional landscaping will be planted in the vicinity of the patio and utility
screening walls on the north side of the building.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
Stormwater Management: The proposed addition will result in a minimal impact to the site’s
level of impervious coverage. For this reason, the City Engineer has indicated that no new
stormwater management will be necessary at this time. However, the proposal will need to undergo
review by the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD). The MCWD has reviewed the
proposal, and is requiring modifications. The modifications, however, are minor, and they are
recommending approval with the condition that MCWD permits be issued prior to issuance of a
building permit. The MCWD revisions will not impact the building location. The MCWD
comment letter is attached, and the condition has been incorporated into the staff recommendation.
Parks and Recreation Comments: The PUD site is immediately adjacent to the Rec Center and
Wolfe Park. Most important is the trail that runs north-south adjacent to the Parkshore building.
The Parks and Rec Department has requested that the trail be kept open at all times during
construction; a condition has been included in the Resolution to reflect the request.
The Parks and Rec Department has indicated that there are no issues or concerns regarding the
reduced setback to the east side of the building.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 4
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
RESOLUTION AMENDING AND RESTATING
RESOLUTION NOS. 96-153, 96-189, 03-139, 04-024, 05-167, 10-023 AND 11-057
ADOPTED ON OCTOBER 7, 1996, DECEMBER 2, 1996, OCTOBER 7, 2003,
FEBRUARY 2, 2004, DECEMBER 5, 2005, MARCH 1, 2010 AND MAY 16, 2011
APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD)
GRANTING MINOR AMENDMENT TO PUD TO ADD A THEATER ADDITION TO
THE PARKSHORES SENIOR COMMUNITY BUILDING LOCATED AT 3663 PARK
CENTER BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, Parkshore Senior Campus, LLC has made application to the City Council
for a Minor Amendment to a Final Planned Unit Development (Final PUD) to a theater addition
at 3663 Park Center Boulevard within a R-C, Multi-Family Residential Zoning District the PUD
having the following legal description:
Lots 1, 2 and 3, Block 1, Silvercrest Addition
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered information related to Planning Case No.
17-33-PUD and the effect of the proposed theater addition on the health, safety and welfare of the
occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values
of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and
compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the Minor Amendment to the Final PUD
will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor with certain
contemplated traffic improvements will it cause serious traffic congestion or hazards, nor will it
seriously depreciate surrounding property values. The Council has also determined that the
proposed amendment to the Final PUD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the
Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 86-62 on May 19, 1986 approving
a special permit to allow construction of a 207 unit senior citizen apartment building at 3663 Park
Center Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-153 on October 7, 1996
approving an amendment to the existing special permit for the 207-unit senior apartment building
at 3663 Park Center Boulevard to allow certain site design changes (realignment of an existing
trail and certain concrete curbs; construction of an additional sidewalk connection; and
modifications to the approved landscape plan) in association with separate PUD approval of a 45
unit assisted living building on a portion of 3601 Park Center Boulevard (now 3633 Park Center
Boulevard); and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-152 on October 7, 1996
approving the Final PUD for the existing office building, removal of the bank with in-vehicle
service and new 45 unit assisted living building at 3601 Park Center Boulevard (now also 3633
Park Center Boulevard); and
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 5
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-189 on December 2, 1996
rescinding Resolution No. 96-152 approving the Final PUD in order to correct the legal description
and address; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution 99-101 on September 7, 1999 approving
an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to adopt a Redevelopment Plan for 3601, 3633 and 3663
Park Center Boulevard allowing certain modifications to ordinance requirements and parameters
for future redevelopment of the office building at 3601 Park Center Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-102 on September 7, 1999
approving the preliminary and final plat for Silvercrest Addition to reconfigure internal lot lines
allowing a 46 unit addition to the assisted living building on Lot 2 for a total of 91 units and
requiring trail easements over Lots 1, 2 and 3 (3601, 3633 and 3663 Park Center Boulevard
respectively), a road easement over Lot 3, trail construction over Lots 1 and 2, a parking agreement
between Lots 2 and 3, certain maintenance agreements, and cooperation with the City regarding
future construction of the north-south roadway and trail on Lot 3; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 2143-99 on September 7, 1999
vacating certain drainage, utility and trail easements at 3601, 1633 and 3663 Park Center
Boulevard effective upon recording new easements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 99-140 on December 6, 1999
amending and restating the conditions of Resolution No. 99-102 to extend the plat filing deadline
to January 6, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 03-138 on October 7, 2003
approving an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to revise the text of the Redevelopment Plan
to allow density and floor area ratio (FAR) averaging over the 3601, 3633 and 3663 Park Center
Boulevard properties, to increase the allowable average floor area ratio for all three properties, to
increase allowable height for future redevelopment of the 3601 Park Center Boulevard, and to
allow a curb cut on the south edge of the 3601 Park Center Boulevard property (until such time as
access consolidation could be achieved), and to adopt an overall Redevelopment Plan for the three
properties;
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 03-139 on October 7, 2003
approving a Preliminary PUD for redevelopment of the 3601 Park Center Boulevard office
building for a 150 unit senior housing condominium building and consolidating conditions from
the PUD for 3601 and 3633 Park Center Boulevard and special permit for 3663 Park Center
Boulevard granting Preliminary PUD approval for proposed and existing development of the
Parkshore Campus at 3601, 3633 and 3663 Park Center Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, a Final PUD was approved regarding the subject property pursuant to
Resolution No. 04-024 of the St. Louis Park City Council dated February 2, 2004 which contained
conditions applicable to said property; and
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 05-167 on December 5, 2005
approving a major amendment to the Final PUD for elimination of age restrictions at Park Summit
Condominiums, 3601 Park Center Boulevard; and
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 6
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 10-023 on March 1, 2010 approving
a minor amendment to the Final PUD to construct a pool addition at the Parkshores Senior
Community located at 3663 Park Center Boulevard;
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-057 on May 16, 2011 approving
a major amendment to the Final PUD to multi-family apartments and increase the density at 3601
Park Center Boulevard;
WHEREAS, due to changed circumstances, amendments to those conditions are now
necessary, requiring the amendment of that Final PUD; and
WHEREAS, it is also the intent of this resolution to continue and restate the conditions of
Resolution Nos. 96-153, 96-189, 03-139, 04-024, 05-167, 10-23 and 11-057 to add the
amendments now required, to reference the required conditions of Resolution No. 99-140, and
thereby to consolidate all conditions applicable to the subject properties into this resolution, and
WHEREAS, the contents of Planning Case Files 86-20-SP, 96-16-PUD, 96-25-CUP, 99-
14-CP, 99-15-S, 99-16-V, 03-37-CP, 03-38-PUD, 05-33-PUD, 10-05-PUD, 11-04-PUD , and 17-
33-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing and the record of decision for
this case.
CONCLUSION
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Resolution No. 11-057 is hereby restated
and amended by this resolution which continues and amends a Final Planned Unit Development
to the subject property for the purpose of permitting multi-family apartments allowing the
construction of a theater addition at the Parkshore Senior Community within the R-C, Multi-
Family Residential Zoning District at the location described above based on the following
conditions:
A. From special permit Res. 96-153 3663 Park Ctr. Blvd. (now also 3633 Park Center Blvd.):
1. That the site be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibit A - Site Plan;
Exhibit B - Ground Floor Plan; Exhibit C - Ground Floor Plan; Exhibit D - First Floor Plan;
Exhibit E - Typical Floor Plan; Exhibit F - West Elevation and North Elevation; Exhibit G
- East Elevation and South Elevation; and Exhibit H - Landscape Site Plan, (the floor plans
are for general purposes only.) except as amended by conditions C. 1-11 adopted on
February 2, 2004 and as modified by the following conditions:
2. The use of the site shall be for senior citizen housing containing 207 units.
3. That all trash be stored inside the building and there be no outdoor storage of trash or trash
containers.
4. That all lighting be directed perpendicular to the ground and no direct rays shall extend
beyond the property line.
5. That the driveway and private entrance contain concrete, poured-in-place curbing
measuring six inches above and below the adjacent roadway surface.
6. That the upper portions of the ramp in the interior of the parking lot contain 5% landscaping
and pedestrian circulation and additional ornamental trees be provided along the south and
east lot lines as shown on the revised plan, and that up to 20 parking spaces be permitted
to be eliminated to provide for the additional landscaping.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 7
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
7. That erosion control provisions be employed during the construction phase to protect
Wolfe Lake and to minimize erosion on the site and runoff of erosion material into other
private or public property.
8. That the entrance road be designed and constructed in a manner so as to protect the City
storm sewer system and as specified by the Director of Public Works.
9. That driveways be constructed at a grade not to exceed 6%.
10. That the link from the cul de sac to the sidewalk be constructed at a grade not to exceed
5% and that all other walkways be constructed at a grade not to exceed 4% and curb drops
be provided at all intersections with the private and public roads.
11. That the east-west walkway along the north property line be at least as wide as the adjacent
trail in Wolfe Park to which it is to link with. Said walkway to be extended by the applicant
to the walkway in Wolfe Park and be lighted using decorative lighting to match the lighting
in Wolfe Park.
12. That prior to construction, an easement be provided to the City permitting the five feet
parallel to Park Center Boulevard to be used for pedestrian purposes and that a pedestrian
easement approximately 25 feet wide be provided along the north property line for
pedestrian purposes. (The width is wider to accommodate the curvilinear nature of the
design.)
13. That all improvements including buildings, landscaping, parking, curbing and other
improvements as contained on the improved exhibits be completed by May 15, 1988;
however, if a certificate of full occupancy is received by September 1, 1987, all landscaping
and other improvements must be completed by October 15, 1987.
14. The continued special permit shall be amended pursuant to Planning Case No. 96-25-CUP
to permit realignment of an existing trail and certain concrete curbs; construction of an
additional sidewalk connection; and modifications to the approved landscape plan to allow
construction of a 45 unit Assisted Living facility on 3633 Park Center Boulevard subject
to the following conditions:
a) The northern portion of the site shall be developed, used and maintained in
accordance with Exhibit I: Demolition Plan, Exhibit J: Site Plan, Exhibit K:
Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Exhibit L: Landscape Plan such
documents incorporated by reference herein.
b) Prior to issuance of an erosion control permit and commencement of site work, a
14 feet wide trail easement shall be dedicated to the City in a form acceptable to
the Director of Park and Recreation and the City Attorney.
c) Prior to issuance of utility permits, details of the proposed storm sewer connection
shall be approved by the City Engineer.
d) Prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit for the adjacent Assisted Living facility,
the trail realignment shall be completed by the applicant in accordance with City
specifications and in a manner acceptable to the Director of Park and Recreation,
unless a letter of credit in an amount equal to 125% of the cost of said trail
construction has been submitted in a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
15. Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant prior to issuance of erosion
control permit and commencement of site work.
B. From Res. 96-189 final PUD for 3601 Park Center Blvd. (now also 3633 Park Center
Blvd.):
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibit A: Demolition
Plan, Exhibit B: Site Plan, Exhibit C: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control Plan, Exhibit
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 8
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
D: Landscape Plan, Exhibits E and F: Elevations, Exhibit G: Fence, Enclosure Designs,
except as amended by conditions C. 1-11 adopted on February 2, 2004, and the following
conditions:
a) Approval of the Final PUD does not grant any concept approval for future phases
of development involving this property.
b) Approval of the Final PUD is contingent upon City Council approval of an
amendment to the Continued Special Permit for the Parkshore Place apartment
property to address associated improvements involving that property; approval of
the Final PUD is further contingent upon adherence by the applicant to any
conditions of such Special Permit approval.
c) Approval of the Final PUD includes modification of the lot width requirement in
the "R-C" District from 80 feet to 40 feet and allows for administrative approval of
a subdivision to create a separate lot for the Assisted Living property (3633 Park
Center Boulevard) as shown on Exhibit B.
d) Approval of the Final PUD is contingent upon termination of the drive thru bank
lease, once the current term expires, and removal of the drive thru building.
e) Evidence of Watershed District approval shall be submitted prior to issuance of
erosion control and building permits; the project shall comply with other City,
State, and Federal agency requirements as applicable.
f) Final Utility Plans and evidence of property owner consent to sanitary sewer
connections shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance
of utility and building permits.
g) Samples of final building materials and colors and potential minor changes to the
exhibits, as needed, shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community
Development prior to issuance of buildings permits. Use of vinyl siding is expressly
prohibited.
h) A development agreement between the applicant and EDA shall be executed prior
to issuance of building permits.
i) Irrigation and Site Lighting Plans (including photometric) shall be approved by the
Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of building permits.
j) Sprinkler and Fire Alarm Plans shall be approved by the Fire Marshall prior to
issuance of building permits.
k) Joint parking and access agreements between the office/bank property, Assisted
Living Property, and Parkshore Place apartment property, in a form acceptable to
the City Attorney, shall be executed prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit for
the Assisted Living facility.
l) All improvements shall be completed in a manner acceptable to the City prior to
issuance of an Occupancy Permit, except that a temporary Occupancy Permit may
be issued prior to completion of landscaping improvements provided a letter of
credit in an amount equal to 125% of the cost of said improvements is submitted in
a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
C. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on February 2, 2004 to incorporate all
of the preceding conditions and to grant Final PUD approval for a 150 unit senior condominium
development (“Park Summit Condominiums”) at 3601 Park Center Boulevard and consolidation
of access and related improvements at 3633 and 3663 Park Center Boulevard subject to the
following conditions:
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 9
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the Final PUD
official exhibits, which shall include the revised Parking Structure plan sheet stamped as
Received by the City December 22, 2003 and the Proposed Access and Internal Circulation
Plan stamped as Received by the City December 30, 2003. The Proposed Access and
Internal Circulation Plan may be revised based upon more detailed future roadway design
work. The Official Exhibits shall also include the revised Description Sketch survey
showing existing trail and roadway easements stamped as Received by the City January
16, 2004, and the revised Dimensional Site Plan stamped as Received by the City on
January 16, 2004. The Proposed Alternate Entrance on the Dimensional Site Plan is not
approved.
2. Prior to any site work, including demolition, the developer shall meet the following
requirements:
a) Development and maintenance agreement(s) shall be executed between the
developer and the City. The agreement(s) shall include, but not be limited to,
conditions for the developer meeting the following requirements:
i) Construction vehicles shall access the site from Hwy. 100, 36th Street, and
Park Center Blvd. utilizing the interim curb cut as a left-in, right-out only.
Construction vehicles shall not be permitted on Park Center Blvd. south of
the senior condominium property.
ii) Public sidewalk and trail construction.
iii) Repair and cleaning of public streets.
iv) Tree replacement.
v) Constructing a consolidated driveway access to all three properties as
shown conceptually on the Proposed Access and Internal Circulation Plan
(dated December 30, 2003) of the Official Exhibits.
vi) Cost sharing for the road improvements to Park Center Boulevard and the
possible traffic signal at the consolidated access driveway.
vii) On-going responsibility for maintaining the strip of park land located east
of the condominium and west of the park access drive off of 36th Street.
viii) Adherence to the parking management plan and requirements to convert the
proof-of-parking spaces if directed by the City in response to on- or off-site
parking problems.
ix) Agreement to pay the equivalent of special service district fees previously
paid by the office development for the 3601 Park Center Blvd. property.
x) Adherence to required conditions in the homeowner’s association
declaration documents.
b) Submit financial security in the form of cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount
of 125% of the costs of public sidewalk and trail installation, repair/cleaning of
public streets/utilities, and tree replacement/landscaping.
c) Required tree protection, erosion control fencing, trail closed signs, and safety
fencing shall be in place and approved by the City prior to any grading and
demolition activities.
d) The homeowners association documents shall be as approved by the City Attorney
and shall prohibit the rental or sale of guest parking spaces and the sale or rental of
any parking spaces to non-residents. The homeowner’s association documents shall
also address continued payment of Special Service District fees equivalent to fees
previously paid by the office development at 3601 Park Center Blvd.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 10
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
e) Record all cross-easement agreements for utilities and drainage for the three lots
within the PUD and record any required changes to the joint parking and access
agreements, maintenance agreement, and trail easement.
f) Reimburse the City for City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents.
g) Obtain demolition, work in the right of way and erosion control permits, Watershed
District permit and other necessary permits from the City and other agencies.
h) Sign Assent Form and Official Exhibits.
i) Meet City and Public Works Department requirements for utility connections and
disconnects, including pavement restoration, protection of sidewalk, trail, lighting
and streetscape elements and replacement of any damaged elements,
j) Meet solar shading requirements or obtain approval of a variance.
k) Meet any other conditions of the development agreement required prior to site
work.
3. Prior to issuance of any building permits, which may impose additional requirements, the
developer shall comply with the following:
a) Meet any Fire Department emergency access requirements during construction.
b) Building materials samples to be submitted to and approved by the City.
c) Lighting plans, including photometrics to be submitted to and approved by the City
for the entire development. Lighting design is to be compatible throughout the
development, and shall meet all City standards.
d) Meet any other conditions as required by the Development Agreement prior to
building permit.
4. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction:
a) All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no
construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays and 10
p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays.
b) Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times.
c) The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties including the City aquatic facility.
d) Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
e) Construction vehicles are prohibited from entering the site from park land property.
f) The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes
necessary in order to mitigate the impact of construction on surrounding properties.
g) A left-in, right-out temporary construction entrance is allowed on the 3601 Park
Center Blvd. property (Lot 1) in accordance with the approved grading plan and
Condition C.2.a) i) of this resolution.
5. A PUD modification to allow a sign setback of 15 feet is approved subject to approval of
a sign permit. Sign permits are required prior to installation of any temporary or permanent
signs and shall include designation of guest parking spaces.
6. The developer shall comply with the following conditions prior to occupancy of the senior
condominium building:
a) All permanent site and building improvements shall be complete, other than
landscaping, and a letter of credit for 125% of the cost of landscaping shall be
submitted.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 11
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
b) Submit as-built plans to the City in electronic or Mylar format for all civil
infrastructure.
c) Meet any other conditions as required by the development agreement prior to
occupancy.
d) If reasonably possible, complete improvements in Condition 7. Otherwise, make
the temporary construction access "permanent" until such time as the consolidated
access is completed.
7. The developer agrees to close the driveway access on the 3601 Park Center Blvd property
(Lot 1), repair the right-of-way, and construct the consolidated PUD access, at developer's
or property owners' expense, at the time of reconstruction of Park Center Blvd. adjacent to
the PUD site.
8. The developer or property owners agree to pay a fair share of any future traffic signal at
the consolidated PUD access.
9. The developer or property owners agree to continue paying the equivalent of special service
district fees previously paid by the office development at 3601 Park Center Blvd.
10. The developer or property owners agree to comply with the conditions of Resolution 99-
102, including but not limited to cooperation with the City regarding future construction
of the north-south roadway and additional trail construction on the 3663 Park Center Blvd.
property (Lot 3).
11. The developer or property owner(s) shall pay an administrative fine of $750 per violation
of any condition of this approval.
D. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on December 5, 2005 to incorporate all
of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions for the Park Summit building at 3601
Park Center Boulevard:
1. The Park Summit building will be revised to be a maximum of 12 stories and 126 feet in
height, having a maximum of 145 condominium units.
2. No age restrictions shall be placed on future residents at the Park Summit Condominiums,
however the condominium units will be marketed to buyers 55 years of age and older.
3. The developer will provide a minimum of 255 parking spaces for the Park Summit
condominium building at 3601 Park Center Boulevard. A minimum of 240 of those spaces
must be provided underground. If shown to be needed, the developer shall allow
underground parking at the Park Shores apartment building (3663 Park Center Boulevard)
to be leased to residents of the Park Summit Condominium building.
4. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the Park Summit Condominiums,
the developer shall:
a) Construct a consolidated driveway access to the campus, completing all driveway and
sidewalk connections as shown on the revised site plan. The direct access point to 3601
Park Center Boulevard will be closed and the access to the campus shall be via the
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 12
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
consolidated campus driveway as shown on the official site plan. This requirement
shall supersede any other requirement in all previous resolutions regarding the direct
access point to 3601 Park Center Boulevard.
b) Grant the City of St. Louis Park an easement for the purpose of the installation of
wireless internet equipment and related appurtenances.
c) Donate $40,000 for the purpose of erecting public art within or near the campus area
for the benefit of the residents of the campus and the City. The developer shall work
with the Director of Parks and Recreation to facilitate the decision process regarding
the type and location of the public art installation.
d) Ensure that all mechanical equipment, including that mechanical equipment already
installed on other buildings within the PUD, is completely and fully screened from off-
site view in accordance with zoning regulations.
e) Provide up to $9,000 toward the cost of transit shelters at the intersection of West 36th
Street and Park Center Boulevard.
E. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on March 1, 2010 to incorporate all of
the preceding conditions and add the following conditions for the Parkshore Apartment building
at 3663 Park Center Boulevard:
1. Modifications to the approved Official Exhibits for the Parkshore Apartment building are
approved as follows:
a) A first-floor addition of a swimming pool, constructed to within 10 feet of the east
property line; and
b) A first-floor addition to the dining area, constructed to within 28 feet of the east
property line.
c) Architectural materials for the building renovation shall match the existing materials
of brick and glass.
2. Prior to construction of the building addition, the developer shall submit financial security
in the form of cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the costs of public
infrastructure, repair/cleaning of public streets/trails/utilities, and tree
replacement/landscaping.
3. At all times during and after construction, access to and trails within Wolfe Park shall
remain passable and shall be kept free and clear of any construction supplies or debris.
4. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction:
a) All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no
construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays and 10 p.m.
and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays.
b) Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times.
c) The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties including the City aquatic facility.
d) Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
e) Construction vehicles are prohibited from entering the site from park land property.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 13
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
f) The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary
in order to mitigate the impact of construction on surrounding properties.
F. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on May 16, 2011 to incorporate or amend
all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions for the Park Summit building at
3601 Park Center Boulevard:
1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits.
2. The PUD allows for the construction of a 192-unit, ten-story apartment building at 3601
Park Center Boulevard. There are no age restrictions on the building.
3. A parking reduction of 6% is approved, reducing the total number of off-street parking
spaces required by 16, from 270 to 254 spaces.
4. Overflow parking shall be allowed within the three-site PUD campus.
5. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall meet the following requirements:
a) Developer shall submit a financial security to the city in the form of cash escrow or
letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the costs of tree replacement, landscaping,
repair/cleaning of public streets, and any required public improvements.
b) Developer shall provide to the city all fees and contributions included in the resolution.
c) A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development,
construction and City representatives.
d) All necessary permits must be obtained.
6. Developer shall enter into a development contract with the City to address the following
issues:
a) Financial securities required by the City.
b) Payment of fees and contributions included in the resolution.
c) Contribution and participation in the construction of a combined entrance for the PUD
site along Park Center Boulevard.
d) Shared parking between parcels within the PUD.
e) Maintenance of landscaping on the site and within adjacent rights-of-way.
7. The fees and contributions of this resolution shall supersede any required under prior
approvals, and shall for the Park Summit development at 3601 Park be as follows:
a) Park Dedication Fee for 192 housing units of $1,500 per unit for a total of $288,000.
b) Trail Dedication Fee for 192 housing units of $225 per unit for a total of $43,200.
c) A public art contribution of $40,000.
8. Developer shall participate in the construction of a consolidated access point for the PUD
campus, including financial contributions to the project as determined by the City Engineer
and finalized in the development agreement.
9. A total of 217 bicycle parking spaces are required. Proof of parking is acceptable for
outdoor bicycle parking, but a minimum of 18 outdoor bicycle parking spaces must be
provided.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 14
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
10. The landscape plans shall be revised to remove all ash trees from the planting plan, and the
tree removal plan shall be revised to include removal and replacement of all ash trees
located within the adjacent boulevard.
11. All utility service lines shall be placed below ground per the requirements of the Zoning
Ordinance.
12. The planned installation of any mechanical equipment shall include means to ensure it is
fully screened from off-site view.
13. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction:
a) All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no
construction activity between the house of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
b) Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times.
c) The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties.
d) Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
e) The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street.
f) The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary
in order to mitigate the impact of construction on surrounding properties.
14. Prior to the issuance of any temporary or permanent occupancy permit the following shall
be completed:
a) Fire lanes shall be signed and striped in accordance with the requirements of the Fire
Marshal.
b) Landscaping shall be installed in accordance with the requirements set forth in the
Planning Case file.
15. Sidewalks shall be maintained at all times in good repair to allow for adequate pedestrian
access to and from the site. To protect the health, welfare and safety of residents,
customers, and employees, snow removal on all sidewalks shall begin with a trigger depth
of ½”, with a continuous effort until the snow event has ceased and complete cleanup has
occurred.
16. All sidewalks shall be maintained free from ice at all times.
17. Snow must be hauled from the site to an off-site location.
18. To ensure pedestrian and vehicular safety, the installation of any on-site traffic calming
measures not indicated on the official exhibits, including speed bumps, shall require a
major amendment to the Planned Unit Development.
G. The Planned Unit Development shall be amended on February 5, 2017 to incorporate or
amend all of the preceding conditions and add the following conditions for the Parkshore Senior
Community building at 3663 Park Center Boulevard:
1. Modifications to the approved Official Exhibits for the Parkshore Apartment building are
approved as follows:
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 15
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
a) A first-floor addition of a theater, constructed to within 11 feet of the east property line;
and
b) Architectural materials for the building renovation shall match the existing materials
of brick and glass.
2. Prior to construction of the building addition, the developer shall submit financial security
in the form of cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the costs of public
infrastructure, repair/cleaning of public streets/trails/utilities, and tree
replacement/landscaping.
3. At all times during and after construction, access to and trails within Wolfe Park shall
remain passable and shall be kept free and clear of any construction supplies or debris.
4. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction:
a) All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no
construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. on weekdays and 10 p.m.
and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays.
b) Loud equipment shall be kept as far as possible from residences at all times.
c) The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring
properties including the City aquatic facility.
d) Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary.
e) Construction vehicles are prohibited from entering the site from park land property.
f) The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary
in order to mitigate the impact of construction on surrounding properties.
In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750
per violation of any condition of this approval.
Assent form and official exhibits must be signed by applicant (or applicant and owner if applicant
is different from owner) prior to issuance of building permit.
Approval of a Building Permit, which may impose additional requirements.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2017
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 16
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment
AERIAL PHOTO:
ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT12/08/17 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL01/08/18 WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt PavekPat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12/08/17REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET01/08/18 ADDENDUM 001. .. .. .. .. .PARKSHORE SENIOR COMMUNITYSAINT LOUIS PARK, MNSHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLEC0.0 TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYC0.1ISSUED FOR: WATERSHED SUBMITTALMASTER LEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALCURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP)SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALLSOIL BORING LOCATIONSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALLEMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED MANHOLE STORMPROPOSED GATE VALVEPROPOSED SANITARY SEWERPROPOSED STORM SEWERPROPOSED WATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTEXISTING LIGHTEXISTING GAS METEREXISTING MANHOLEEXISTING CATCH BASINEXISTING GATE VALVEEXISTING HYDRANTEXISTING GAS VALVEEXISTING ELECTRIC BOXEXISTING STOPBOXPROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARYPROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORMDYH
PROPOSED SIGNEXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATIONINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROWDEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER:PARKSHORE SENIOR CAMPUS LLC6515 GRAND TETON PLAZA, SUITE 300MADISON, WI 53719608-833-7600ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.0L1.0LANDSCAPE PLANSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.0 SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3C1.0 REMOVALS PLANGOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALHAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, LLC2825 CEDAR AVE S.MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55407612-729-2959L1.1LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILSEOF=1135.52SB-1TOPROPOSED LIGHTEXISTING SANITARY SEWEREXISTING STORM SEWEREXISTING WATER MAINEXISTING GAS MAINEXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRICEXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITARCHITECT:KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100,BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425612-879-6000CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416612-615-0060UTILITY PLANC4.0C2.1 DORA PLAN11C1.1 TREE PRESERVATION PLANCIVIL DETAILSC5.0City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 17
EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGGENERATOR PAD ANDBASE MATERIAL, TYP.SALVAGE AND RELOCATEEXISTING GENERATOR, SEESHEET C2.0 FOR NEW LOCATION.EXISTING MECHANICALTRANSFORMERS ANDCONCRETE PADS TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPED AREA, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL, TYP.EXISTING PATIO TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING PLANTER TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE, TYP.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSREMOVAL NOTES:1.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATERMANAGEMENT PLAN.2.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE ANDLOCAL REGULATIONS.3.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.4.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEARESTJOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.5.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITHSTATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.6.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AREAPPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.7.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THEDURATION OF THE CONTRACT.8.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ONTHE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING,DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.9.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THEPLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.10.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN AMANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.11.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISESHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.12.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT,DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITYMATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.13.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURINGNORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALLCIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.14.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALLINCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALLPUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BEPERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.15.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND ASAPPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.16.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THEDRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK REMOVAL NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.REMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT12/08/17 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL01/08/18 WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt PavekPat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12/08/1701" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN01/08/18 ADDENDUM 001. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL11City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 18
N89°27'25"W 360.32N16°15'46"W 176.74182.87Δ=56°38'13"R=185.00
S89°30'42"E 303.07S00°19'28"W 308.48N89°27'25"W 360.32N16°15'46"W 176.74182.87Δ=56°38'13"R=185.00
S89°30'42"E 303.07S00°19'28"W 308.48
EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING TREEAND BALL ROOT, TYP.REMOVE EXISTING PLANTER, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGGENERATOR PAD ANDBASE MATERIAL, TYP.SALVAGE AND RELOCATEEXISTING GENERATOR, SEESHEET C2.0 FOR NEW LOCATION.EXISTING MECHANICALTRANSFORMERS ANDCONCRETE PADS TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGLANDSCAPED AREA, TYP.REMOVE EXISTINGPAVEMENT AND BASEMATERIAL, TYP.EXISTING PATIO TOREMAIN, PROTECTFROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING PLANTER TOREMAIN, PROTECT FROMDAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN,PROTECT FROM DAMAGE, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.EXISTING TREES TOREMAIN, PROVIDETREE PROTECTIONFENCING, TYP.REMOVALS LEGEND:TREE PROTECTIONREMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL,INCLUDING BIT., CONC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS.REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALLFOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS.TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPSISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT12/08/17 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL01/08/18 WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt PavekPat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12/08/1701" = 20'-0"20'-0"10'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.1TREE PRESERVATIONPLAN01/08/18 ADDENDUM 001. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALTREE SURVEY:1TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS:11City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 19
FDFDREF.UPDNUPDWFDFDExisting Dining057Kitchen061Lounge052Circulation060X047A46 ft²Family08246 ft²Family081VPCPTCTCPT180 ft²Private Dining080188 ft²Circulation082171 ft²Service Station086832 ft²Commons B083882 ft²Commons A08472 ft²Storage085VPCPTClosetCloset259 ft²Three-SeasonPorch087085084a083087a087b086089088CPTCT081082080084c084b087dCTCPTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS5.0'5.0'4.0'3.2'1.0'8.0'9.0'4.0'8.8'4.0'4.0'3.5'4.0'4.3'9.5'3.0'17.8'7.7'3.0'4.0'7.0'11.0'REMOVE AND REPLACEEXISTING PAVEMENT ANDBASE MATERIAL TO MATCHEXISTING PAVEMENT SECTIONFOR UTILITY CONSTRUCTIONPATIO ADDITION TOMATCH EXISTING, TYP.STAMPED CONCRETE PATIO, TYP.PLANTING BED, SEE SHEET L1.0OUTDOOR FIRE TABLE & FURNITURE. FINALEQUIPMENT SELECTION PER ARCH.PROVIDE SLEEVING, ELECTRIC, AND GASCONNECTIONS PER EQUIPMENTSPECIFICATIONS.OUTDOOR FURNITURE TO BE SPECIFIED BY ARCH.8' X 9' GENERATOR PAD FORSALVAGED AND RELOCATEDGENERATOR. COORDINATE WITHUTILITY COMPANY FORSPECIFICATIONS.CMU MECHANICALENCLOSURE, TYP.CONCRETE SIDEWALK, TYP.CONCRETE WALK, TYP.CONCRETE WALK, TYP.CONNECT CONCRETE WALK TOEXISTING BIT. TRAIL, PROVIDESMOOTH TRANSITION BETWEEN. ANYDAMAGE TO BIT. TRAIL SHALL BE THESOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THECONTRACTOR.4.0'STAIRS, REFER TOARCHITECTURAL FORMATERIAL/DETAILS,TYP.15' BUILDING SETBACK11.3'11.2'17.2'11.6'1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING BUTNOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGS ANDPAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIREDAFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TOOWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OFMATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY AND STREETOPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITEIMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHALLBE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATION OFBUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUTNOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURBRAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A.REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OF TRAFFIC.WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTEDOR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITEIMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEELANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROWSCITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT12/08/17 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL01/08/18 WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt Pavek Pat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12/08/1701" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0SITE PLAN01/08/18 ADDENDUM 001. .. .. .. .. .SITE AREA TABLE:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALCONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOFINISHED GRADETOOLED CONTROL JOINTSEE DETAIL (TYP.)LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TOTRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTHTROWELLED EDGE5" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASECOMPACTED SUBGRADENOTES:1. INSTALLATION AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND INACCORDANCE TO AN ON-SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED.2. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHTREQUIREMENTS.3. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS.4. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS.5. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS.6. WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS REQUIRED FOR ALL WALKS OR IN LOCATIONS FORVEHICULAR TRAFFIC.W1.6 X W1.6 WIRE MESH AND CHAIRS ASSPECIFIEDLIGHT DUTY CONCRETE WALK/PAD3"2"THIS OCCURS ONLY WHEREMULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALKLEAVE TOP OFMULCH DOWN 1"FROM TOP OF WALKN T S111City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 20
N89°27'25"W 360.32N16°15'46"W 176.74182.87Δ=56°38'13"R=185.00
S89°30'42"E 303.07S00°19'28"W 308.48N89°27'25"W 360.32N16°15'46"W 176.74182.87Δ=56°38'13"R=185.00
S89°30'42"E 303.07S00°19'28"W 308.48 FDFDREF.UPDNUPDWFDFDExisting Dining057Kitchen061Lounge052Circulation060X047A46 ft²Family08246 ft²Family081VPCPTCTCPT180 ft²Private Dining080188 ft²Circulation082171 ft²Service Station086832 ft²Commons B083882 ft²Commons A08472 ft²Storage085VPCPTClosetCloset259 ft²Three-SeasonPorch087085084a083087a087b086089088CPTCT081082080084c084b087dCTCPTDORA CALCULATIONS:SITE PLAN LEGEND:ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT12/08/17 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL01/08/18 WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt PavekPat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12/08/1701" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.1DORA PLAN01/08/18 ADDENDUM 001. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALPROVIDED DORA SPACE111City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 21
FDFDREF.UPDNUPDWFDFDExisting Dining057Kitchen061Lounge052Circulation060X047A46 ft²Family08246 ft²Family081VPCPTCTCPT180 ft²Private Dining080188 ft²Circulation082171 ft²Service Station086832 ft²Commons B083882 ft²Commons A08472 ft²Storage085VPCPTClosetCloset259 ft²Three-SeasonPorch087085084a083087a087b086089088CPTCT081082080084c084b087dCTCPTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS8 - BES6 - KFG9 - PMD24 - AMS12 - KFG9 - AC18" DECORATIVE ROCKMAINTENANCE STRIP, TYP.EDGING, TYP.LAWNLAWNEDGING, TYP.LAWNDECORATIVE BOULDERS, TYP.1 - PFC9 - CS30 - BES6 - BAH1.ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH OVER WEED BARRIER. OWNER'S REP SHALL APPROVE MULCH SAMPLE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. EDGING SHALL BEMETAL EDGING OR APPROVED EQUAL.2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.3.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR ISRESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.4.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.5.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FORONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.6.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.7.COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES ANDSHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.8.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.9.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.10.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.LANDSCAPE NOTES:01" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0LANDSCAPE PLAN01/08/18 ADDENDUM 001. .. .. .. .. .PLANT SCHEDULE - ENTIRE SITESYMQUANT.COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMESIZEROOTCOMMENTSORNAMENTAL TREESPFC1PRAIRIEFIRE FLOWERING CRABMalus 'Prairiefire'1.5" CAL.B&BSTRAIGHT LEADER. FULL FORMSHRUBS - CONIFEROUS & EVERGREENAC9ALPINE CURRANTRibes alpinum24" HT.CONT.PERENNIALS & GRASSESAMS24AMAZON MIST SEDGEChrysanthemum 'Dark Bronze Daisy'#1CONT.KFG18KARL FOERSTER GRASSCalamagrostis x acutiflora "Karl Foerster"#1CONT.PMD9PARDON ME DAYLILLYHemerocallis 'Pardon Me'#1CONT.CS9CARADONNA SALVIASalvia x sylvestris 'Caradonna'#1CONT.BES38GOLDSTURM RUDBECKIARudbeckia fulgida 'Goldsturm'#1CONT.BAH6BLUE ANGEL HOSTAHosta 'Blue Angel'#1CONT.LEGENDPROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEESCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESSODDECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA.PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUBSYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES ANDPLANTING SIZESPROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS - SEESCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES1" DIA. DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC,SAMPLES REQUIREDSHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH OVER FILTER FABRIC,SAMPLES REQUIREDGOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONPARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT12/08/17 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL01/08/18 WATERSHED RESUBMITTAL. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt PavekPat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c24904Patrick J. SarverLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12/08/17TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS:11City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 22
FDFDREF.UPDNUPDWFDFDExisting Dining057Kitchen061Lounge052Circulation060X047A46 ft²Family08246 ft²Family081VPCPTCTCPT180 ft²Private Dining080188 ft²Circulation082171 ft²Service Station086832 ft²Commons B083882 ft²Commons A08472 ft²Storage085VPCPTClosetCloset259 ft²Three-SeasonPorch087085084a083087a087b086089088CPTCT081082080084c084b087dCTCPTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSSB-3SB-2SB-1CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY w/ CITYAND ANY ADJACENT PROPERTYOWNERS THAT GRADING OFFSITE ISACCEPTABLE. COORDINATE PRIORTO CONSTRUCTION, TYP.1.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TOSITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THEOWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIREDSOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.3.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONALPOLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTSOF THE CITY.4.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX.CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUMSLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:17.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4'IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGNDRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.8.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THEDURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BERESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES.9.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESSSOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIALTO THE SITE.10.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREASDESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ONTHE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDINGPADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TOBE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BEESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.11.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHINLIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACEWITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONSARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADEDSHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIRALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THECORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TOEQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.12.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/ORPARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH AGROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER ANDSHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALLDETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THESUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILSENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTIONSYSTEMS.13. TOLERANCES13.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOTABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT ISMADE.13.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORETHAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHEREMEASUREMENT IS MADE.13.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOWTHE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.13.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.14.MAINTENANCE14.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEPAREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.14.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TOSPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTYPERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.14.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, ANDCOMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSGROUNDWATER INFORMATION:CITY OF SAINT LOUIS PARK GRADING NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.3EROSION CONTROL NOTES:ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION
PARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt PavekPat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.11/29/1701" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0GRADING PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOPER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY HAUGO GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES, INC., DATED 09-26-17GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM 872.50 TO 874.50THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS:SB-1874.00-874.50SB-2873.00SB-3872.50-873.50City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 24
UNDERGROUND STORMWATERINFILTRATION SYSTEM 121" PERF. CMP(2) HEADERS12" SIDE & END STONE,12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION6" STONE COVER AND BASEFOOTPRINT=85.50' X 6.50'IE STONE=876.25IE 21" CMP=876.75TOP 21" CMP=878.50TOP STONE=879.00100-YR HWL=878.44INLET 1RIM=879.91NYLOPLAST 12" PEDESTRIANGRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (LOCKING)CONNECT DIRECTLY TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM, TYP.INLET 2RIM=879.84NYLOPLAST 12" PEDESTRIANGRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (LOCKING)CONNECT DIRECTLY TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM, TYP.INLET 3RIM=879.86NYLOPLAST 12" PEDESTRIANGRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (LOCKING)CONNECT DIRECTLY TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM, TYP.43LF 10" SDR 26 PVCSTORM @ 2.00%CORE-DRILL PVC CONNECTIONPROP. IE=874.79OUTLET IE=877.50ARCHITECT TO WATERPROOF EAST ENDOF BUILDING DUE TO CLOSE PROXIMITYTO INFILTRATION BASIN, TYP.9LF DRAIN TILE,MATCH SIZE ANDMATERIAL W/ARCH PLANS @2.00%FOOTING DRAIN TILECONNECTION, SEEARCH FOR LOCATIONAND DEPTHIE=875.83(COORD W/ ARCH)CLEANOUTRIM=880.50IE(SW)=875.65IE(S)=875.65IE(N)=875.6519LF 6" SDR 26 PVCSTORM @ 9.74%FDFDREF.UPDNUPDWFDFDX047AVPCPTCTCPTVPCPT085084a083087a087b086089088CPTCT081082080084c084b087dCTCPTCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNDERGROUND STORMWATERINFILTRATION SYSTEM 121" PERF. CMP(2) HEADERS12" SIDE & END STONE,12" STONE PIPE SEPARATION6" STONE COVER AND BASEFOOTPRINT=85.50' X 6.50'IE STONE=876.25IE 21" CMP=876.75TOP 21" CMP=878.50TOP STONE=879.00100-YR HWL=878.44INLET 1RIM=879.91NYLOPLAST 12" PEDESTRIANGRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (LOCKING)CONNECT DIRECTLY TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM, TYP.INLET 2RIM=879.84NYLOPLAST 12" PEDESTRIANGRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (LOCKING)CONNECT DIRECTLY TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM, TYP.INLET 3RIM=879.86NYLOPLAST 12" PEDESTRIANGRATE OR APPROVED EQUAL. (LOCKING)CONNECT DIRECTLY TO INFILTRATION SYSTEM, TYP.43LF 10" SDR 26 PVCSTORM @ 2.00%CORE-DRILL PVC CONNECTIONPROP. IE=874.79OUTLET IE=877.50ARCHITECT TO WATERPROOF EAST ENDOF BUILDING DUE TO CLOSE PROXIMITYTO INFILTRATION BASIN, TYP.9LF DRAIN TILE,MATCH SIZE ANDMATERIAL W/ARCH PLANS @2.00%FOOTING DRAIN TILECONNECTION, SEEARCH FOR LOCATIONAND DEPTHIE=875.83(COORD W/ ARCH)CLEANOUTRIM=880.50IE(SW)=875.65IE(S)=875.65IE(N)=875.6519LF 6" SDR 26 PVCSTORM @ 9.74%ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATE DESCRIPTION
PARKSHORE SENIOR
COMMUNITY
3663 PARK CENTER BLVD, SAINT LOUIS PARK, MN 55416
1301 AMERICAN BLVD E, SUITE 100, BLOOMINGTON, MN 55425
KAAS WILSON ARCHITECTS
PROJECT
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .10/06/17 REVISED PRICING SET10/20/17 STORMWATER REVISIONS11/29/17 OWNER REVIEW SET4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CivilSiteGroup.comMatt PavekPat Sarver763-213-3944952-250-200309/15/17 PRICING SETPROJECT NO.: 17151COPYRIGHT 2017 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.c44263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.11/29/1701" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0UTILITY PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .GOPHER STATE ONE CALLWWW.GOPHERSTATEONECALL.ORG(800) 252-1166 TOLL FREE(651)454-0002 LOCALUTILITY LEGEND:CATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAP1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILTIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TOTHE OWNER.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND"SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORMWITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION.10. UTILTIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTIONTO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIMELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUMOF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCUTRES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALLTRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ONUNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, ANDFLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BYTHE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BECOMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL CORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARYAS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TOMAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITHMN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0.GENERAL UTILITY NOTES:City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 25
N0°28'43"E425.0077Ingress & Egress Esmt per Doc.No. 9770383Roadway Esmt per Doc.No. 7237320Most SW Cor Lot 3,Silvercrest AdditionW'ly Line Lot 3, SilvercrestAdditionNW'ly Line Lot 3, SilvercrestAdditionSE Cor Lot 2, ParkCenterUtility Esmt per Doc.No. 5546530Trail Esmt per Doc. No. 7237322,,Silvercrest AdditionE Line Lot 1, Blk 1,Silvercrest AdditionW Line Lot 2FD FIP OPEN0.27 NO.28 WFD FIP OPEN0.07 S0.11 WFD FIP0.06 S0.11 WFD FIP 23908?0.17S0.08WFD FIP OPEN0.37 N0.08 WFD FIPSM 437__0.46 S0.24 WFD FIP OPEN0.29 S1.06 EFD FIP0.69 S1.38 EFD FIP 23908?0.78 S1.08 EFD FIP OPEN0.26 S0.62 EOPENSIGNGRATEACUNITOVERHANGACUNITBituminous PathBituminous PathBituminous PathGEN.PADGRASSGRASSGRASSGRASSCITY PARKCITY PARKLOADINGDOCKBENCHESBENCHESRET WALLSANCOSANCO11 STALLSPARK CENTER BOULEVARD(PUBLICLY TRAVELED)P A R C E L AOwner:The Wayside House, Inc.Owner: City of St. Louis ParkSouth LineLot 2294+/- Ft. Nto 36th St. WDrainage and Utility Easement per platof Silvercrest Addition18.1±19.5±1.5±1.1±7.0±7.0±14.7±14.4±19.8±30.5±30.1±8080L O T 1L O T 2SILVERCRESTWESTMORELAND PARKPARKCENTERPARKCENTER1051051012256.74PONDPARKSHORE PLACEADDITIONNPROPERTY LINEPROPERTY LINEABOVE GROUND PARKING STRUCTUREPATIOADDITIONLINK WILSONREG. NO: 21629I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.DateProject Number1301 American Blvd ESuite 100Bloomington, MN 55425tel: (612) 879-6000www.kaaswilson.comCopyright Kaas Wilson Owner:Projectkaas wilson architects1/32" = 1'-0"12/6/2017 1:57:32 PMC:\Revit Local\17018-E.J. Plesko-ST.Louis Park-Parkshore Performance Room Add_borga004.rvtArch. Site Plan9.15.201717018Parkshore Performance RoomAdditionParkshore Senior Campus, LLCA1203663 Park Center BlvdSaint Louis Park MN 554166515 Grand Teton Plaza, Suite 300Madison WI 53719Interiors:Kaas Wilson Archtiects1301 American Blvd. E.,Suite 100Bloomington, MN 55425Structural:BKBM5930 Brooklyn Blvd.,Minneapolis, MN 55429Civil/Landscape:Civil Site Group4931 W 35th St., Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416P:763.213.3944General Contractor:Stevens Construction1650 W. 82nd St., Suite 1040Bloomington, MN 554311/32" = 1'-0"1Site PlanPERMEABLE -40,135 SF -35%IMPERMEABLE -74,117 SF -65%TOTAL -114,252 SFPERMEABLE -43,208 SF -38%IMPERMEABLE -71,044 SF -62%TOTAL -114,252 SFEXISTINGw/ ADDITIONRev. No.RevisionDateCity Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 26
UPFDFDREF.UPDNUPDWFDFDOvenREF.DWOvenFDFD1122ABCExisting Dining057Kitchen061Lounge052Circulation060PROPERTY LINE0'-0"N.I.C.N.I.C.N.I.C.N.I.C.X047Arst90°90°66'-0"45°1 3 5 °45°NEW PATIOADDITIONEXISTINGPAVING1138 ft29'-11 3/8"28'-9 9/16"STAGE11'-4"WINDOW8'-0"4'-8"WINDOW8'-0"6'-8"WINDOW8'-0"4'-8"WINDOW8'-0"6'-8"GAS FIRE PITALLUMINUM TRELLIS ABOVEEXISTING PLANTINGSNEW PLANTINGS45 ft²Family08246 ft²Family081NEW PLANTINGVPCPTEXISTING TRANSFORMEREXISTING TRANSFORMEREXISTING MECHANICALLVPCPTTVGAS FIREPLACE10101010105897MODERNFOLD ACOUSTI-SEAL 932 PAIRED PANEL FOLDING PARTITIONPROJECTOR-IN CEILING4A6003A6001A600180 ft²Private Dining080188 ft²Circulation082168 ft²Service Station086826 ft²Commons B083878 ft²Commons A084BULLETIN WALL51 ft²Storage0851'-4 1/4"6'-4"9'-4"6'-4"5'-4"4'-0"FLD. VFY3'-1 11/16"4444444444756ClosetClosetTVNEW PLANTINGS259 ft²Three-SeasonPorch087SCREEN WALLNEW PLANTINGSA50015A600A5004A5002A5003A3002A3003XI500121113RELOCATED GENERATORI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI1.3AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AI2AF2BI2AI2A085084a083087a087b086089088CPTCT081082080084c084b087dI2AI2AF2BF2BF2BF1F1F1F2CTCPT20'-3"135°11'-10 1/16"2'-0"14'-0"27'-10 1/16"5'-5 1/16"2'-0"1'-4"4'-8"35'-9 15/16"3'-4"19'-3 1/2"4'-0"3'-10"3'-0"11'-4"1'-10 3/8"7'-4"1'-5 3/16"8'-0"8'-0"16'-0"7'-4"1'-10 3/4"7'-0"2'-3 3/4"7'-0"7'-0"6'-2 1/2"7'-1 5/16"9 3/4"5'-0"FLD VFY8"7'-4"2'-0"3'-6"2'-7"3'-8 1/8"3'-0"2'-6"5'-4 1/8"135°135°2'-0"3'-0"32'-3 13/16"2'-5"2'-5"27'-6 9/16"9'-8"3'-0"3'-11"4'-4"6'-0"5'-4"3'-10 11/16"NEW CMU MECHANICAL ENCLOSURE02030201014" RIGID INSULATION BELOW SLAB ON GRADE4'-0" MIN.E9E9E9E9E6E6E99'-9"087cXI50014XI50015XI50016XI4001LVPCPTXI500178XI501XI501342LVP CTLVPCTXI5011XI500132XI5004563'-8" MIN.3'-8" MIN.1Unless noted otherwise, dimensions at framed walls aretaken to the center line of stud, dimensions to furring wallsare to the finished face of wall, and dimensions to masonrywalls are taken to the face of wall. All dimensioning isnominal.GENERAL NOTES:2See sheet A800 for wall, floor-ceiling, and roof-ceilingassemblies.= EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN3See sheet A700 for room finish schedule.4See sheet A804 for door schedule, door elevations, anddoor details.5Flooring transitions between rooms separated by doorsshall occur below the door, which may or may not be thecenter of the wall assembly.6All louvers and access panels shall be painted to match theadjacent wall or ceiling surface.7Locations of electrical appurtenances (switches, controlpanels, outlets, etc.), fire alarm horn/strobe, or other suchdevices shall not be moved in any manner from thelocations shown in the drawings without approval by thearchitect.8All structure shall be fire protected in accordance with therequired ratings listed on the Code Analysis, sheet A110.9The general contractor is responsible for coordination andsequencing of the work of all trades.10All doors, frames, glazing, finishes, etc. that are indicated toremain shall be properly protected against damage duringconstruction. Any items that are damaged shall be restoredto their original condition and quality, by either repair orreplacement. The Architect shall determine whether or not arepair sufficiently restores the condition and quality of thedamaged item.11Patch and repair concrete floor slabs as required.B24SS36B18XI500121113COOKTOP WITH DOWNDRAFT VENT.34" HIGH COUNTERTOPBUILT-IN OVEN AND REF.I2AI2AI2AI2AF1I2AI1.3F2F1F1F13'-0"2'-6"5'-4 1/8"3'-0"089Service Station086W1236W24365XA850XI50014XI50015XI50016XI50078910I2AI2AI2AI2A082081Family081Family082XI500710987'-4"2'-0"5'-0"5'-0"2'-0"XI500LINK WILSONREG. NO: 21629I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.DateProject Number1301 American Blvd ESuite 100Bloomington, MN 55425tel: (612) 879-6000www.kaaswilson.comCopyright Kaas Wilson Owner:Projectkaas wilson architectsAs indicated12/6/2017 1:58:09 PMC:\Revit Local\17018-E.J. Plesko-ST.Louis Park-Parkshore Performance Room Add_borga004.rvtFloor Plans -Ground9.15.201717018Parkshore Performance RoomAdditionParkshore Senior Campus, LLCA3003663 Park Center BlvdSaint Louis Park MN 554166515 Grand Teton Plaza, Suite 300Madison WI 53719Interiors:Kaas Wilson Archtiects1301 American Blvd. E.,Suite 100Bloomington, MN 55425Structural:BKBM5930 Brooklyn Blvd.,Minneapolis, MN 55429Civil/Landscape:Civil Site Group4931 W 35th St., Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416P:763.213.3944General Contractor:Stevens Construction1650 W. 82nd St., Suite 1040Bloomington, MN 554311/4" = 1'-0"1Ground Level3/8" = 1'-0"2Ground Level - Kitchenette1/2" = 1'-0"3Ground Level - RestroomsRev. No.RevisionDateCity Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 27
Level 1100'-0"Level 2108'-6 1/2"Ground Level88'-9"Foudation83'-2"TO PARAPET12'-9 1/2"2'-8"6'-0"4'-1 1/2"01014.15.14.34.34.70101Level 1100'-0"Ground Level88'-9"4.15.17.27.14.37.2Level 1100'-0"Ground Level88'-9"4A6003A6007.17.24.302STANDING SEAM METAL ROOFLevel 1100'-0"Ground Level88'-9"4A6003A6004.15.17.27.14.37.1CFB PANEL - COLOR 1: TBDEXTERIOR MATERIALS TAG KEY4.1BRICK 1 - UTILITY (SIOUX CITY BRICK) - COLOR:BADLANDS VELOUR4.3COLORED CMU - COLOR: TBD4.7STONE SILL7.2CFB TRIM - COLOR 1: TBD5.1PREFINISHED METAL COPING - COLOR: TBDEXTERIOR ELEVATION NOTES1. SEE DRAWING SHEETS A830 FORWINDOW HEAD, JAMB AND SILL DETAILS.2. SEE A800 & A801 FOR EXTERIOR WALLDETAILS.3. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLSARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OFMASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTEROF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESSNOTED OTHERWISE.4. SEE SHEETS A003 FOR INTERIOR ANDEXTERIOR WALL TYPES.5. EXPANSION JOINTS REQUIRED ATMASONRY WALLS EVERY 30'-0"(REGARDLESS IF SHOWN ON ELEVATIONOR NOT SHOWN ON ELEVATION), SEESHEET A801.6. PROVIDE BRICK EXPANSION JOINTS ATALL MASONRY INSIDE CORNERS, SEESHEET A800.7. ALL WINDOWS IN BRICK TO HAVESTONE SILLS.8. FOR VERTICAL JOINTS OF DIS-SIMILARMATERIALS CONTACT ARCHITECT.9. COMPLY WITH FLASHING DETAILS ONSHEETS A840 FOR ROOF.10. GEODETIC ELEVATION 881.1 FROMCIVIL PLANS = 100'-0" IN ARCHITECTURALPLANS11. TOPOGRAPHY SHOWN INELEVATIONS IS FORREPRESENTATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY.SEE CIVIL.12. MECHANICAL LOUVERS TO BECUSTOM COLOR SELECTED BYARCHITECTLINK WILSONREG. NO: 21629I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A REGISTERED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.DateProject Number1301 American Blvd ESuite 100Bloomington, MN 55425tel: (612) 879-6000www.kaaswilson.comCopyright Kaas Wilson Owner:Projectkaas wilson architectsAs indicated12/6/2017 1:58:19 PMC:\Revit Local\17018-E.J. Plesko-ST.Louis Park-Parkshore Performance Room Add_borga004.rvtExteriorElevation9.15.201717018Parkshore Performance RoomAdditionParkshore Senior Campus, LLCA5003663 Park Center BlvdSaint Louis Park MN 554166515 Grand Teton Plaza, Suite 300Madison WI 53719Interiors:Kaas Wilson Archtiects1301 American Blvd. E.,Suite 100Bloomington, MN 55425Structural:BKBM5930 Brooklyn Blvd.,Minneapolis, MN 55429Civil/Landscape:Civil Site Group4931 W 35th St., Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416P:763.213.3944General Contractor:Stevens Construction1650 W. 82nd St., Suite 1040Bloomington, MN 554311/4" = 1'-0"1Performance Room - East Elevation1/4" = 1'-0"2Performance Room - West Elevation1/4" = 1'-0"3Performance Room - South Elevation1/4" = 1'-0"4Performance Room - North ElevationMATERIAL AREASEast ElevationGlass -277 SF -≈29%Masonry (4.1, 4.3, 4.7) -669 SF -≈71%Total Area -946 SF -100%West ElevationCFB Panel (7.1, 7.2) -420 SF -100%Total Area -420 SF -100%North ElevationMasonry (4.1, 4.3, 4.7) -237 SF -100%Total Area -237 SF -100%South ElevationGlass -211 SF -≈58%CFB Panel (7.1, 7.2) -103 SF -≈28%Masonry (4.1, 4.3, 4.7) -53SF -≈14%Total Area -367 SF -100%Rev. No.RevisionDateCity Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD AmendmentPage 28
January 25, 2018
Gary Morrison
Assistant Zoning Administrator
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
RE: Parkshore Senior Living Addition: 3663 Park Center Boulevard (MCWD Permit Number 17-613)
Dear Mr. Morrison,
I am writing in regards to the Parkshore Senior Living addition located at the above named address. I am
reviewing their application for a District Stormwater Management permit. The applicant proposed an
underground stormwater system on the east side of the proposed patio. After review of the submitted
materials, I determined that the system proposed by the applicant would not conform with our rules due to
proximity to groundwater. I received a resubmittal today, January 25, 2018, and will not be able to determine
conformance with the rule prior to the City Council meeting. As such, I request that receiving a Minnehaha
Creek Watershed District be listed as a condition of approval on their land use approvals.
If you have any questions please contact me at eshowalter@minnehahacreek.org or 952-641-4518.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Showalter
Permitting Technician
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4d)
Title: Parkshore Senior Campus – Minor PUD Amendment Page 29
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4e
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Accept Monetary Donations to Westwood Hills Nature Center
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary
donation from Brian and Sidonia Johnson in the amount of $732.50, Patrick and Melanie Padden
in the amount of $732.50 and Richard and Jill Johnson in the amount of $735 to be used at
Westwood Hills Nature Center for a bench in honor of their father and father-in-law, Dick
Johnson’s 90th birthday.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept these gifts with restrictions
on their use?
SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is
necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the
use of each donation prior to it being expended.
Brian and Sidonia Johnson graciously donated $732.50 to Westwood Hills Nature Center with the
restriction that it be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center for a bench in honor of Dick Johnson’s
90th birthday.
Patrick and Melanie Padden graciously donated $732.50 to Westwood Hills Nature Center with
the restriction that it be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center for a bench in honor of Dick
Johnson’s 90th birthday.
Richard and Jill Johnson graciously donated $735 to Westwood Hills Nature Center with the
restriction that it be used at Westwood Hills Nature Center for a bench in honor of Dick Johnson’s
90th birthday.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: These donations will be used at Westwood
Hills Nature Center for a bench in honor of Dick Johnson’s 90 birthday.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Carrie Mandler, Westwood Hills Nature Center Secretary / Program Aide
Reviewed by: Mark Oestreich, Manager of Westwood Hills Nature Center
Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Title: Accept Monetary Donations to Westwood Hills Nature Center
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
RESOLUTION APPROVING ACCEPTANCE OF DONATIONS
IN THE AMOUNT OF $2,200
TO BE USED AT WESTWOOD HILLS NATURE CENTER
FOR A BENCH IN HONOR OF DICK JOHNSON’S 90th BIRTHDAY
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance
of any donations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by
the donor; and
WHEREAS, Brian and Sidonia Johnson donated $732.50, Patrick and Melanie Padden
donated $732.50, and Richard and Jill Johnson donated $735.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that the gifts are hereby accepted with thanks to Brian and Sidonia Johnson, Patrick and
Melanie Padden, and Richard and Jill Johnson with the understanding that they must be used at
Westwood Hills Nature Center for a bench in honor of Dick Johnson’s 90th birthday.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4f
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Edina for 40th and France Avenue
Property
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to adopt the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
between the City of St. Louis Park and the City of Edina.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council want to enter in to a joint agreement with
the City of Edina to memorialize relationships and responsibilities for future maintenance and
improvements to the property at 40th and France Avenue?
SUMMARY: The City of Minneapolis owned approximately 14.54 acres of property located
directly south and west of the intersection of 40th Street and France Avenue. Approximately 9.77
acres of the site is in Edina and 4.77 acres is located in St. Louis Park. In 2016, the City of St.
Louis Park purchased the northern 4.77 acres and the City of Edina purchased the adjacent 9.77
acres of property from the City of Minneapolis. In order to clarify roles and
responsibilities/liability for ongoing maintenance of the property and future improvements that
might be made, the City Attorney has prepared a Memorandum of Understanding with the City of
Edina to formalize our rights and responsibilities. This agreement does not commit the city to any
specific project.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None at this time.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Memorandum of Understanding
Prepared by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Title: Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Edina for 40th and France Avenue Property
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING, made this 22 day of January, 2018,
is entered into between the CITY OF EDINA, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Edina”) and the
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“St. Louis Park”), with the parties
collectively hereinafter referred to as the "Cities”.
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the Cities recently purchased two parcels of park land which straddle the
municipal boundaries of the Cities and shares a border. Edina purchased and is the sole owner of
the property located within the municipal boundaries of Edina and legally described on the
attached Exhibit A (“Edina Property”). St. Louis Park purchased and is the sole owner of the
property located within the municipal boundaries of St. Louis Park and legally described on the
attached Exhibit B (“St. Louis Park Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Cities desire to memorialize their respective rights and responsibilities
regarding the Edina Property and the St. Louis Park Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1.EDINA PROPERTY. Edina will have the sole right and responsibility to maintain,
repair, and improve the Edina Property. In the event that Edina needs to enter onto the St. Louis
Park Property in order to maintain, repair, or improve the Edina Property, Edina will first obtain
permission from the St. Louis Park City Manager, which permission shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
2.ST. LOUIS PARK PROPERTY. St. Louis Park will have the sole right and
responsibility to maintain, repair, and improve the St. Louis Park Property. In the event that St.
Louis Park needs to enter onto the Edina Property in order to maintain, repair, or improve the St.
Louis Park Property, St. Louis Park will first obtain permission from the Edina City Manager,
which permission shall not be unreasonably withheld.
3.SHARED SERVICES. In the future, either of the Cities may contract with the
other or with a third party for the performance of maintenance services across both the Edina
Property and the St. Louis Park Property. In the event that said services are performed by a third
party, the Cities shall divide the costs of said services as follows: 2/3 paid by Edina and 1/3 paid
by St. Louis Park.
4.WAIVER. Any and all persons engaged in work to be performed by Edina on the
St. Louis Park Property shall not be considered employees of St. Louis Park for any purpose,
including Worker’s Compensation or any and all claims that may or might arise out of said
employment context on behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by
any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said Edina employees while
so engaged in any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of
St. Louis Park. Any and all persons engaged in work to be performed by St. Louis Park on the
Edina Property shall not be considered employees of Edina for any purpose, including Worker’s
Compensation or any and all claims that may or might arise out of said employment context on
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4f) Page 3
Title: Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Edina for 40th and France Avenue Property
behalf of said employees while so engaged. Any and all claims made by any third party as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part of said St. Louis Park employees while so engaged
in any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation or responsibility of Edina.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Cities have caused this agreement to be executed by their
duly authorized officials.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK CITY OF EDINA
BY ____________________________ BY ____________________________
Tom Harmening, City Manager Scott Neal, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4f) Page 4
Title: Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Edina for 40th and France Avenue Property
Exhibit A
The Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 7, Township
28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4f) Page 5
Title: Memorandum of Understanding with the City of Edina for 40th and France Avenue Property
Exhibit B
The South Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 7, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4g
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Traffic Study 689: Authorize Removal of Parking Restrictions on Wooddale Avenue
at Toledo Avenue
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing removal of parking
restrictions on the east side of Wooddale Avenue from 100 feet to 140 feet south of W. 40th Street.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The authorization of parking restrictions is allowed per the City’s
established regulatory authority.
SUMMARY: Staff received a request in November 2017 to evaluate the parking restrictions on
Wooddale Avenue near Wooddale Lutheran Church. Wooddale Lutheran is the applicant. This
request was brought to the Traffic Committee for their December meeting.
The Traffic Committee recommended that the parking restrictions in front of Wooddale Lutheran
Church should be removed. The church no longer requires the timed parking restriction on the
street due to recent additions that grant more access to their front door. Removing the timed “no
parking” restriction, Sundays 6 a.m. – 1 p.m., will provide parking flexibility to the church’s
patrons as well as the surrounding neighborhood.
In addition, there is a disability parking space on Wooddale in front of the church that was installed
without council approval. In general, the city does not install disabled parking spaces on public
right-of-way. This is because the location of the space does not meet the minimum accessibility
requirements for a disabled parking stall, creating non- compliant disability parking. The church
has adequate disability parking available in their parking lot behind the church. This sign will be
removed at the same time as the other signs are removed.
After the Traffic Committee made a recommendation, a letter was sent to the surrounding business
owners, property owners, and residents soliciting feedback. Staff did not receive any responses
from the property owners.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost to enact the parking restrictions is
minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Location Map
Resolution 6094 – to be rescinded
Prepared by: Ben Manibog, Transportation Engineer
Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Title: Traffic Study 689: Authorize Removal of Parking Restrictions on Wooddale Avenue at Toledo Avenue
RESOLUTION NO. 18-___
AUTHORIZE REMOVAL OF PARKING RESTRICTIONS
ON WOODDALE AVENUE AT TOLEDO AVENUE
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 689
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota received a request from to evaluate the
existing parking restrictions on the east side of Wooddale Avenue east of Toledo Avenue.
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has completed a process to inform
interested parties about the Traffic Committee recommendation to remove the timed parking
restriction and disability parking sign in front of Wooddale Lutheran Church at Wooddale Avenue
east of Toledo Avenue.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that the Engineering Director is hereby authorized to:
1.Rescind Resolution 6094 – eliminating timed parking restrictions on the east side of
Wooddale Avenue at 4003 Wooddale Avenue.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
WOODDA
L
E
A
V
E
40TH
S
T
W
TOLEDO AVE S4003
398039743974
398039803974
398639743980
398639863980
397439863974 3974
3974
3980
3974
3986
3986
3980 3986
39863980 3980
3986 3986
3974
3974 39803980
398639863974
399039903990
399039903990
4016
4011 50215112
3985
3971
3975
4032510850175116
5120
39703970
39703962
3970
3970
39623962
3970
3970
3962 51
04
5201
4065
5
1
00
4016
4012
4022
4004
4010
4020
4060
4017
4056
4052
4048
4044
4021
4025
4000
4026
4029
4064
4033
5
0
2
0
40414024
5
0
1
6
50134036
50
1
2
404039965008
4028 40463980
3962
3970
3962
3962
3970
3962
3970
3962
3962
3970
3962
3962
3970
4013
4069
5009
0 100 20050
Feet ´
TS 689 - Extents Map - 2/5/18
Legend
Proposed Removal of Parking Restrictions
Property Lines
City Council Meeting of February 05, 2018 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Traffic Study 689: Authorize Removal of Parking Restrictions on Wooddale Avenue at Toledo Avenue Page 3
City Council Meeting of February 05, 2018 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Traffic Study 689: Authorize Removal of Parking Restrictions on Wooddale Avenue at Toledo Avenue
Page 4
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4h
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Traffic Study 690: Authorize Parking Restrictions on the 4300 Block of Excelsior
Boulevard
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of parking
restrictions on the north side of Excelsior Boulevard between Kipling Avenue and 36 ½ Street.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: The authorization of parking restrictions is allowed per the City’s
established regulatory authority.
SUMMARY: Staff received a request from Opitz Outlet in November 2017 to evaluate the state
of parking on the north side of Excelsior Boulevard between Kipling Avenue and 36 ½ Street. The
requestor had concerns for vehicles parked for long periods of time, which may prevent other
vehicles trying to go to local businesses along Excelsior Boulevard.
The Traffic Committee discussed the request and recommends that a one hour parking restriction
should be added to the north side of Excelsior Boulevard between Kipling Avenue and 36 ½ Street.
This restriction would be consistent with those along Excelsior Boulevard at Grand Way.
After making a recommendation, a letter was sent to the surrounding business owners, property
owners, and residents soliciting feedback. The only response staff received was from one person
who was opposed to the change.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost to enact the parking restrictions is
minimal and will come out of the general operating budget.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Location Map
Prepared by: Ben Manibog, Transportation Engineer
Reviewed by: Debra M Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Title: Traffic Study 690: Authorize Parking Restrictions on the 4300 Block of Excelsior Boulevard
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
RESOLUTION INSTALLING PARKING RESTRICTIONS
ON THE 4300 BLOCK OF EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD
TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 690
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota received a request to evaluate the
parking on the north side of Excelsior Blvd. from Kipling Ave. to 36 ½ Street.
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota has completed a process to inform
interested parties about the Traffic Committee recommendation to install one-hour parking
restrictions on the north side of Excelsior Blvd. from Kipling Ave. to 36th 1/2 Street.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that the Engineering Director is hereby authorized to:
1.Install “ONE HOUR PARKING” restrictions on the north side of Excelsior Boulevard
from Kipling Avenue to 36 ½ Street.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
EXCELSIOR BLVDKIPLING AVE S36 1/2 ST W
JOPPA AVE S37TH ST W
EXCELSIOR BLVD4400
4415
4201
4320
4301
43004320
4331
3740
4245
3757
4317
4200
4409 43084300
3624
4415
3700
3724
3701
3627
4419
3621
4306
3625
3711
3703
3744
3740
3734
3730
3775
3771
3765
3761
3747
3741
3737
3731
3727
3721
3715
3709
3620
3730
3726
3722
3716
3710
3711
3705
3746
3740
3700
3736
3730
3726
3720
3716
3712
3706
3632
3626
3621
4221
37823781 3750 3751 3750
3615
44244170
4143
3616
0 100 20050
Feet ´
TS 690 - Extents Map - 2/5/18
Legend
Proposed Parking Restrictions
Property Lines
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4h)
Title: Traffic Study 690: Authorize Parking Restrictions on the 4300 Block of Excelsior Boulevard Page 3
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Accept Donation from the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary
donation from the Jewish Community Relations Council to allow three police department staff to
attend their annual educational trip to the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC on April 24th,
2018.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on
its use?
SUMMARY: State statute requires City Council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is
necessary in order to make sure the City Council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the
use of each donation prior to it being expended.
The JCRC has graciously extended an invitation for three members of the police department to
attend a trip to the Holocaust Museum in Washington DC on April 24, 2018. This is a one day
trip to educate police officers on the history of the Holocaust and to provide a deeper understanding
of the Jewish culture. All costs associated with the trip are covered by the JCRC.
The City Attorney has reviewed this matter. His opinion is that state law permits the payment of
such expenses by this organization, regardless of whether the funds come from primary or
secondary sources. It is treated as a gift to the city and there needs to be a resolution adopted by
the City Council determining that attendance at this event serves a public purpose and accepting
the gift. The resolution needs to be adopted before attendance.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: None
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Mike Harcey, Police Chief
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Page 2 City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4i)
Title: Accept Donation from the Jewish Community Relations Council (JCRC)
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING DONATION FROM THE JEWISH COMMUNITY
RELATIONS COUNCIL TO ALLOW THREE POLICE OFFICERS TO ATTEND AN
EDUCATIONAL TRIP TO THE HOLOCAUST MESEUM IN WASHINGTON DC.
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance
of any donations; and
WHEREAS, the City Council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by
the donor; and
WHEREAS, the Jewish Community Relations Council will provide for all costs associated
with allowing three police officers to attend their one day educational trip to the Holocaust
Museum in Washington DC on April 24th, 2018.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to the Jewish Community Relations Council to
allow three police officers to attend their educational trip to the Holocaust Museum in Washington
DC on April 24th, 2018.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4j
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor Resolution Update
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution revising Resolution 17-196 limiting
the number of off-sale intoxicating liquor licenses issued in St. Louis Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the Council wish to amend Resolution 17-196 regarding
limiting the number of off-sale liquor licenses issued in St. Louis Park that was adopted on
December 18, 2017?
SUMMARY: The City Council adopted Resolution 17-196 limiting the number of off-sale
intoxicating liquor licenses. At the time of adoption there were currently 15 licensed off-sale liquor
stores in the City. The 2018 liquor license renewal process is underway and 13 of the 15 current
establishments have submitted for renewals. Jennings’s Liquor and Sam’s Club Liquor did not
submit applications for renewal. This changes the number of off-sale intoxicating liquor licensed
in the city to 13.
The attached resolution modifies the number of licenses from 15 to 13 to reflect actual number of
license applications at the present time.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4j) Page 2
Title: Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor Resolution Update
RESOLUTION NO. 18-___
RESOLUTION REVISING RESOLUTION NO. 17-196
LIMITING NUMBER OF OFF-SALE
INTOXICATING LIQUOR LICENSES
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2017 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-196
whereby the City Council restricted the number of off-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to fifteen (15);
and
WHEREAS, only thirteen (13) of the fifteen (15) licensed off-sale liquor licenses in the
stores are being utilized by businesses that are still in operation; and
WHEREAS, the City remains concerned about the number of off-sale intoxicating liquor
licenses issued on a per capita basis compared to neighboring and other comparable cities; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has regulatory concerns about this relatively high number and
location of off-sale liquor establishments in the City; and
WHEREAS, the City Council believes that it would be in the best interest of the City and
its citizens to engage in more detailed studies to determine if additional regulations are needed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council also believes that it is appropriate and in the best interest of
the City and its citizens to limit the number of off-sale intoxicating liquor licenses to the existing
number of issued licenses at this time that are currently being utilized while the City Council studies
the issue; and
WHEREAS, in accordance with State law, City Code Section 3-72 allows the City Council
by resolution to restrict the number of any type of liquor license issued by the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1.Pursuant to St. Louis Park City Code Section 3-72, the total number of off-sale
intoxicating liquor licenses issued in the City will be restricted to thirteen (13).
2.The only off-sale intoxicating liquor license that will be issued will be for the
continued operation of a liquor store by a new or existing owner at a location that is
currently utilizing the existing licensed premises.
3.This resolution shall be effective upon its adoption and shall apply to all pending
and future applications, and shall expire on June 30, 2018.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
__________________________________ ______________________________________
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Meeting: City Council Meeting
Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4k
OFFICIAL MINUTES
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
June 7, 2017, 6 p.m.
Rec Center Programming Office
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rich Bluma, Bruce Cantor, George Foulkes, George Hagemann,
Tiffany Hoffmann and Peter May
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Griffin and Edward Halvorson
GUEST(S) PRESENT: Tamara Nugteren and Girl Scout Troop 14177
Glen Waguespack and Nancy Blankfard (HGA)
STAFF PRESENT: Rick Beane, Park Superintendent, Brian Hoffman, Director of
Inspections, Jacquelyn Kramer, Associate Planner (6:50 p.m.), Mark
Oestreich, Manager of Westwood Hills Nature Center, Cindy Walsh,
Director of Operations and Recreation, Jason West, Recreation
Superintendent and Stacy Voelker, Recording Secretary
1.Call to Order
Commissioner May called the meeting to order at 6:01 p.m.
2.Presentations
None.
3.Approval of Minutes
a. May 3, 2017
Commissioner May requested a spelling correction to Ms. Burns name on page 3, sixth
paragraph.
Commissioner Hagemann made a motion to approve the minutes of May 3, 2017 as
amended. Commissioner Hoffmann seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of
6 – 0.
4.New Business
a. Girl Scout Troop 14177 Request for Gaga Pit at Middle School
Mr. Beane welcomed Girl Scout Troop 14177. Tamara Nugteren, scout leader, advised
the troop primarily consists of girls entering 8th grade plus their younger siblings. The
Troop shared a petition with the commission asking to add a gaga ball pit endorsed by 83
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4k) Page 2
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2017
individuals. Mr. Beane indicated he has received requests for gaga pits in the city from
various groups.
The scouts have attended girls scout camps, which include gaga pits, and enjoy the
activity. They provided a description of a gaga pit and how the game is played. Gaga can
be played with any number of players, any age and any athletic ability. It is a fast-paced
activity, is inclusive to all, is easy to learn and is empowering. The pit is easy to build and
a ball is all that’s needed to play. Mr. Beane indicated the materials to construct the gaga
pit would cost approximately $2,000 for wood and fabricated brackets. City staff would
construct.
Mr. Beane met with the School District and the Girl Scouts to discuss the gaga pit being
located at the Middle School. The scouts preferred it be located in an area close to the
school to provide an opportunity for many to utilize. The School District was excited to
have on their property and decided it be located on the northwest side of the school near
the tennis / volleyball courts.
Commissioner Foulkes made a motion to move forward on the addition of a gaga pit.
Commissioner Hoffmann seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 6 – 0.
The Girl Scout Troop inquired how they could contribute to the city via fundraising or
service projects. They indicated the Girl Scouts are always looking for service projects
(i.e. cleaning, painting, etc.).
Staff will discuss logistics and provide details to the Girl Scouts. Mr. Beane indicated
another request for a gaga pit has been received from the Browndale Park area.
The Advisory Commissioners and Girl Scouts thanked each other.
b. Hockey Day Minnesota
Ms. Walsh advised the Minnesota Wild hosts Hockey Day Minnesota, a one day event in
Minnesota that features at least four games of hockey in one day. The event is generally
held in January or February and an outdoor ice rink is constructed specifically for the
event. When construction began on the ROC, staff contacted the Minnesota Wild to offer
the ROC as a host site. When awarded as a host site, the community pays for everything.
City staff met with Fox Sports to tour our site and discuss details. Staff also visited
Stillwater as Hockey Day Minnesota was held at their location on January 21, 2017. Since
locations are secured for 2018 and 2019, staff expressed interest to host the event in 2020
or 2021. A committee will be assembled to create a marketing package of our location
and amenities for the Minnesota Wild. Commissioners are encouraged to contact Ms.
Walsh if they are interested in being part of the committee that will assemble the package.
The commission will be updated on the status of this event.
Mr. Beane indicated this event is very important for high school hockey and would be
exciting to host. Commissioner Foulkes inquired if staff has discussed with Benilde-St.
Margaret’s. Ms. Walsh advised local high school teams typically play so Benilde-St.
Margaret’s and St. Louis Park High School will be involved.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4k) Page 3
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2017
Mr. West advised sponsorship and gate admission provides revenue from the event. The
Minnesota Wild has prime sponsors who would have first right of refusal for sponsorship,
advised Ms. Walsh. The sponsorship package is created by the host. The sponsorship
provides funding for the expenses. The City will apply for a host position.
c. Westwood Hills Nature Center Architect Selection Recommendation
Ms. Walsh indicated 11 proposals were received (three out of state) for the Westwood
Hills Nature Center project. The 11 proposals were reviewed by city staff and
Commissioner Foulkes. Six outstanding firms were interviewed. Mr. West felt it was a
great process.
Ms. Walsh introduced Glen Waguespack and Nancy Blankfard from Hammel, Green &
Abrahamson, Inc. (HGA). Ms. Blankfard provided an introduction and HGA’s history.
HGA presented the three dimensional concept models (the “Gateway”, “Branch” and
“Merge”) that were presented to the interview panel. She feels this project would fit in
line with other buildings in the area.
Mr. Hoffman advised HGA offers full service which is important as the Nature Center
building will be energy efficient. Ms. Blankfard stated HGA would work with a
subcontractor to ensure the net zero goals are met. The schedule was presented with
completion anticipated in fall of 2019.
Ms. Blankfard expressed an integrated team is important, especially since it is trying to
achieve a net zero facility. The Commission members reviewed the thresholds and
character of the area entering the park. The goal is to have the building introduce the
natural environment of Westwood Hills. The firm reviewed the existing and proposed
building, plus cataloged the resources on the site. They will review solar and wind
exposure, experience, topography and access to items such as the lake. HGA provided a
graph of potential energy efficiency strategies (i.e. solar, ventilation, etc.). Ms. Blankfard
indicated the building will connect with the landscaping. Identifying the opportunities
that exist on the site will assist in designing the building.
Commissioner Hoffmann inquired on the cost; Mr. Hoffman advised the city budgeted
$120,000.
Commissioner Cantor made a motion to recommend the City Council enter into a
contract with HGA to provide architectural services for the Westwood Hills Nature
Center project. Commissioner Foulkes seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote
of 6 – 0.
d. Platia Place Development (9920 and 9808 Wayzata Blvd.) Park and Trail
Dedication
Jacquelyn Kramer, Associate Planner, advised an application was received for a
preliminary plat and PUD for the Platia Place development on the old Santorini site (394
and 169). The application proposes a six-story, 150-unit apartment building and a six-
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4k) Page 4
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2017
story, 111-room hotel on the site. The property will be privately owned and they would
maintain the site. The application is scheduled to go before the City Council on July 15.
Ms. Walsh advised whenever new, large developments are proposed, the Commission
reviews to determine if a park or trail should be included in the designated area. If not, the
developer is required to provide park and trail dedication to the city. The dedication is put
into the Park Improvement Fund (PIF) which has an annual budget of approximately one
million. Staff submits proposed Park Improvement Fund projects to the City Council
annually. The ROC was bonded so it did not come out of the Park Improvement Fund.
Most of the projects in the parks, etc. are funded by the PIF. Commissioner Hagemann
provided instances where members have recommended the developer provide less
dedication than originally calculated.
Commissioner Hagemann suggested additional review of more high-density
developments. The location being discussed was a restaurant while a hotel and
apartments are being proposed. Another option is to change the Comprehensive Plan to
include a clause stating if space becomes available, park space should be considered.
Staff suggested holding discussions regarding the Comprehensive Plan to ensure more
DORA’s (Dedicated Outdoor Recreation Areas) are included in the plans.
Commissioner Hagemann made a motion to approve acceptance of cash-in-lieu of land
in the estimated amount of $313,748 for Park and Trail dedication from SLP Park
Ventures for the Platia Place Development proposal. Commissioner Cantor seconded the
motion. The motion passed on a vote of 6 – 0.
5. Old Business
a. Skate Park Update
Mr. West provided a history and timeline of the project. A storm water basin will be
located under the skate park in Carpenter Park. The project is budgeted at $200,000 and a
Youth Sports Grant was received in the amount of $100,000.
On May 24 , staff hosted a public meeting with California Skate Parks, which was
attended by approximately 25 people. California Skate Parks provided proposed
schematics for comments from the attendees. A new rendering will be provided from
California Skate Parks at a meeting to be held on June 16 to obtain feedback from the
original participants that viewed the first diagram.
Commissioner Bluma feels there was good energy from the attendees; a lot of ideas were
presented to California Skate Parks. The company is excited about the space for the Skate
Park.
Commissioner Cantor inquired if there will be another meeting with California Skate
Parks after the June 16 meeting. There may be another meeting or could obtain feedback
via emails stated Mr. West.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4k) Page 5
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2017
b. ROC Update
Grand Opening
Mr. West indicated the ROC Grand Opening was held in conjunction with the annual
Children’s First Ice Cream Social on May 21. Approximately 1,500 people attended the
event. All enjoyed the music and dancers which made for a great day.
Future Programming
Rummage sales, battle of bands, RC car racing, basketball programs, open mic nights,
walking programs, broomball leagues and pond hockey leagues are just a few of the
programs staff plans to hold in the ROC, Mr. West indicated. The ROC has been rented
for a birthday party and has a wedding party interested in the venue. Staff has solidified a
contract with My Hockey, which is a group that rates hockey teams. They bring in 35-40
hockey teams for a tournament weekend and will use the ROC and Rec Center ice arenas.
Current events scheduled in the ROC include: a Naturalization/Immigration event, Jewish
Family Services event and Parktacular events.
Maintenance staff are painting railings and heating sealing seams for a seamless look, Mr.
West indicated. Ms. Walsh advised there may be circumstances where staff will need to
clear the ROC roof of wet, heavy snow if it accumulates. The roof has been engineered
for heavy loads but staff does not want wet snow to sit on the roof. Staff and
Commissioners discussed the vortex that goes through the ROC. Commissioner
Hagemann suggested providing a wind screen for events.
6. Staff Communication
Mr. Oestreich indicated Westwood is in their second week of summer camps, which is a 13-week
program. The city and Great River Greening are in contract to remove buckthorn. The plan is to
eliminate buckthorn in Westwood over the course of three years. Planting has begun on the lower
level of the woods and northeast area of the park. The boardwalk has arrived and Tree Trust is
working to connect. Estimate completion in 3 – 4 weeks, advised Mr. Oestreich.
Fishing with a Cop was awarded a $9,000 grant to get more youth involved in fishing and
archery, Mr. Oestreich advised. There are 20 youth in the program which targets English as a
Second Language (ESL) children from the Middle School. The officer’s partnered with a youth
to help pick out fishing and archery equipment then returned to Lamplighter Pond to fish. In July
the group will do an archery event and in September they will host a final fishing and cookout
event. Staff assists with the events; it is a good partnership between departments.
Mr. West advised the Aquatic Park opened last weekend and had record-breaking revenue for an
opening weekend. The playground program is offered at a variety of sites with approximately
900 participants. The Rec Center offices were renovated, including paint, new carpeting and new
furniture.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4k) Page 6
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of June 7, 2017
7. Member Communication
Ms. Walsh welcomed Commissioner Cantor. Introductions were shared.
Commissioner Hagemann advised Friends of the Arts had Pianos on Parade at the Ice Cream
Social in May. The two pianos, offered by a St. Paul non-profit group to get pianos outdoors, will
be in various locations in the City. The locations include: on a trailer in the Parktacular parade, at
the ROC, at the Aquatic Park and in Byerly’s. Friends of the Arts organized painting of the
pianos during the Ice Cream Social. Having the pianos in various locations encourages play.
Our Town Sings will be at the Wolfe Park Amphitheater beginning June 13. There will also be
an ice cream truck vendor at the event, Commissioner Hagemann indicated.
Commissioner Hagemann advised May was bike month. The events were discussed, including
the Bike to Work day which was held on Friday, May 19. This event offered pit stops from 7:30
– 9 a.m. which were staffed with volunteers. The volunteers distributed swag, ice water, coffee,
and other items to celebrate those biking to work. Three Rivers participated and provided mobile
maintenance for attendees. They anticipated 75 people for the event but approximately 150 – 200
people arrived in the hour and a half between all locations. The bicyclists were pleased with the
celebration. On a Saturday morning in May, a family bike ride was offered. The ride was held at
a kid-friendly pace and geared for family fun. Participants biked from Aquila Park to Dakota
Park then back. Family fun things, including decorations for the bikes and St. Louis Park water
bottles with police cap shaped tops, were provided to participants.
Commissioner Foulkes indicated the architect interviews were very interesting as their approach
varied. There were two above the rest. Foulkes commented the local firm was very well prepared.
Ms. Walsh expressed her appreciation for Commissioner Foulkes involvement in the process.
8. Other / Future Agenda Items
Ms. Walsh indicated the Commission typically does not meet in July due to lack of quorum. The
next step in the Nature Center process is to hire a construction management group, which will
occur in August. Staff and Commissioners reviewed dates and decided to hold the next meeting
August 23.
9. Adjournment
It was moved by Commissioner Hoffmann and seconded by Commissioner Hagemann to adjourn
at 8:01 p.m.
The motion passed 6 - 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Stacy Voelker
Stacy Voelker, Recording Secretary
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4l
OFFICIAL MINUTES
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
August 23, 2017, 6 p.m.
Rec Center Programming Office
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rich Bluma, Bruce Cantor, George Foulkes, George Hagemann,
Tiffany Hoffmann and Peter May
MEMBERS ABSENT: Elizabeth Griffin and Edward Halvorson
GUEST(S) PRESENT: Brian Recker (RJM)
STAFF PRESENT: Brian Hoffman, Inspections Director (6:14 – 6:29 p.m.) Jim Vaughan,
Natural Resources Coordinator, Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations
and Recreation and Stacy Voelker, Recording Secretary
1. Call to Order
Commissioner May called the meeting to order at 6:07 p.m.
2. Presentations – Little League
Matt Moran, President of the Little League Association, and the Commission members shared
introductions. Mr. Moran advised in 2017 there were 468 boys and 16 girls that participated
which formed 46 teams. In 2016, there were 450 participants. They’ve seen continual growth
throughout the years. The Association is attempting to have a development path for individuals to
keep them playing the sport. Generally there is a reduction in registration at the kid-pitch level.
This year the organization offered approximately 25 scholarships for players. Their goal is to get
as many individuals involved in the sport so no one is turned away.
The little League Association is run by all volunteers (coaches and the board), which keeps the
community involved. There is a good success rate and kids are taught responsibility through the
sport. Background checks are completed on all coaches and they are trained. Winning is not the
main goal of the program, Mr. Moran advised. The goal is to get as many kids to play as many
positions as possible so they enjoy the sport. This helps expand on the number of individuals
who can pitch. The program ensures all participants get an opportunity and they focus on training
when needed.
Registration begins in January. They do a great deal of indoor facility training at the Senior High
School or Middle School. As soon as weather permits, they train outside. St. Louis Park has great
fields. Mr. Moran complimented Rick Beane and Matt Shopek for the fields.
There are 12 – 13 players on each team. They offer a 20 game season. Kid-pitch ends the last
week in June. July offers additional tournaments for those interested. The Classic Tournament is
hosted in St. Louis Park. This supports six teams of 10-12 year olds. Five to eight year olds
continue playing until the second week in July. Fall baseball begins the last week of August and
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4l) Page 2
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2017
is a ten-game season. This year 175 individuals participated in fall ball. The Association also
partners with the Senior High School to offer clinics.
In 2017 the association hosted a district tournament and received great reviews of Skippy Field,
the volunteers that assisted, etc. They also hosted an 11 year old classic tournament that went
well.
“It’s great to see continuous maintenance and replacement of park facilities”, Mr. Moran
commented. Improvements lately include replacing fences at Skippy Field and rebuilding a
pitching facility. The Association paid a portion of the expense for concrete and a pitching
mound. The association utilizes five to six parks for practice during their season. They have split
practices so that two teams utilize a field at the same time. The Little League partners with the
Softball Association and both use DIB system for volunteers. More coaches makes it better for
youth participants. Mr. Moran indicated the fields are in good shape. The only problematic field
is at Twin Lakes although it does get better in the fall.
Mr. Moran indicated the association is partnering for the 13–15 year old level. Historically, kids
stop playing baseball around 13-15 years old. The association’s goal is to get as many players to
continue to play as possible. Class are starting to see bigger growth.
Commissioner Cantor inquired if most participants are from St. Louis Park. Mr. Moran indicated
90% are from the Park and approximately 10% are from Minneapolis.
Commissioners and Mr. Moran shared appreciation for the presentation.
3. Approval of Minutes
a. June 7, 2017
Commissioner Hagemann made a motion to approve the minutes of June 7, 2017.
Commissioner May seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 6 – 0.
4. New Business
a. Westwood Hills Nature Center Construction Manager Discussion
Ms. Walsh introduced Brian Recker from RJM. The City worked with RJM on the ROC
project and they have risen to the top of the construction manger position for the Nature
Center project.
Mr. Recker, the president of RJM, advised he has been with the organization for 15 years.
RJM has been in business for 20 years and offer commercial general contractor services.
The organization specializes in health care, office buildings and historical renovation
projects. They work with nonprofit organizations, charter schools and other organizations
to assist with construction management of a project from the beginning to the end. Most
of their work is in the Twin Cities; they regularly work with 19 cities in the metro area.
They are the ninth largest company in Minnesota. They employ approximately 160 people
in the office and in the field. The goal of RJM is to provide value from the beginning to
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4l) Page 3
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2017
the end of construction of a project. About 85% of the work they do is with repeat clients,
which is a goal of the company. Mr. Cantor inquired if the organization delivers on time.
Mr. Recker indicated they do and have a very good track record. They work diligently to
overcome any issues and will replace contractors if necessary to keep the project on
schedule.
Mr. Recker described the construction management process to the Commission. The City
hires RJM at the beginning of the design phase. From the onset of the project, RJM works
with the architect through the design stage and prepares a budget reflecting what the team
wants. If over budget, RJM offers solutions as they work very close with the architect.
The first level is the schematic design phase where the layout of the floor, elevation, etc.
is prepared. A budget at that phase is then prepared by reviewing options. The next level
is the design development phase which provides more details of the design. They go out
to market to ensure within the budget with all the phases. The design can be modified to
ensure it is within the budget. RJM assists with the bidding process. They work on the
project and meet weekly with the city /team to keep apprised of progress, ensure the
project is within budget and on time. A site supervisor will be onsite to coordinate
activities of the subcontractors; they ensure all contractors are putting in the correct
material, staying on schedule and basically coordinate all construction activities of the
project.
Ms. Walsh indicated a panel interviewed RJM Construction, Stahl Construction, Kraus-
Anderson Companies, Inc. and Adolfson & Peterson Construction for construction
management services. Staff and Commissioner Foulkes were on the interview panel. Ms.
Walsh indicated it is important for RJM to do a good job on the project as they depend on
repeat business. They worked well on the ROC project so the city requested the same
team work on the Nature Center project.
Commissioner Hoffmann inquired on the length of the project. Design phase will begin
then onto the bid phase, Ms. Walsh advised. Mr. Recker anticipates a year’s work of
design time with bidding occurring in fall of 2018 and construction beginning in spring of
2019. Mr. Hoffman indicated constructing the building will take approximately eight to
nine months. Ms. Walsh explained the City Council wants the Nature Center to be
utilized as a teaching facility, be sustainable and keep the existing building open and
functional during construction. Mr. Recker indicated it will be challenging to minimally
disrupt customers but the site supervisor’s main priority is safety to users. A lot of
planning will be involved with the entire team. Mr. Hoffman added having lead time is
valuable to get it right without a sense of hurry.
Commissioner Foulkes noted RJM considered some very interesting items, one is the
influence on the neighborhood and ways to keep construction equipment to a minimal.
Ms. Walsh indicated the team has thought through safety and how to keep the
neighborhood involved, as they want to be involved. Potentially, the neighborhood may
have the contract information for the site supervisor.
Commissioner Hoffmann made a motion to recommend the City Council enter into a
contract with RJM Construction to provide construction management services for the
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4l) Page 4
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2017
Westwood Hills Nature Center project. Commissioner Foulkes seconded the motion.
The motion passed on a vote of 6 – 0.
Mr. Recker thanked the commission and offered to provide an update at any time.
b. Evergreen Award and Natural Resource Review (Jim Vaughan)
Mr. Vaughan, Natural Resources Coordinator, introduced self and provided a handout
noting Natural Resource updates to the Commission.
Since 1990, Evergreen Award winners have been chosen from the city. Each winner is
presented with an award certificate, a Dwarf Alberta Spruce and “Evergreen Award
Winner” signs posted in their boulevard for two weeks. There were eight nominations this
year for the award, Mr. Vaughan advised. The nominations were reviewed by a team and
two nominations will be recommended as winners to the City Council in mid-September.
The city is always looking for more nominations; members were encouraged to help
spread the word. Questions can be directed to Jim Vaughan.
Emerald Ash Borer (EAB) has yet to be found in St. Louis Park. Testing on Ash trees
continues to come back with negative results. Staff is watching for woodpeckers as they
peel larva of EAB, which may indicate the arrival in the City. In conducting a tree
inventory, it was determined the city has approximately 2,000 ash trees. Lower
conditional ash trees are being removed. Commissioner Cantor inquired how long an
injection will protect the tree. Mr. Vaughan advised protection will last approximately
three years.
Mr. Vaughan provided information on tree injection statistics, which are lower this year,
and advised of the annual tree sale. This year the Japanese beetle has been bad due to a lot
of moist, lush turf, which creates great growing conditions. They feed on grass roots
which typically come out in July for approximately six weeks. Apple Scab, a leaf fungus
which is due to wet weather, is prominent this time of year.
The city offers a brush site which is open until October 29. There are specific hours it is
open for brush drop off but it also opens for additional hours as warranted (i.e. storm
clean up).
The city created two community gardens this year, one in Shelard Park and the other in
Birchwood Park. Commissioners reviewed pictures of the garden locations and the raised
beds. Mr. Vaughan reviewed the process to obtain a plot. The plots sell for $35 per
season and have collection bins. The city cleans up the weeds between the garden plots to
keep area neat. Commissioner Hoffmann inquired if any trouble has arisen with people
stealing the produce from the gardens. Mr. Vaughan advised this year the problem has
increased with whole plants being removed in some cases. Motion camera have been
installed in an attempt to catch the individual(s) offending the gardens.
Mr. Vaughan indicated there is a huge increase in the amount of geese this year,
especially around Wolfe Park. Many complaints have been received. In the past, the city
would hire a company to perform a round up and disperse to other communities or states.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4l) Page 5
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2017
Some would go to food shelves. Currently, a formal process is needed with public
meetings and permitting. Staff hopes to complete the process over the winter to be ready
to initiate a geese management plan in June and July of 2018. Geese do not like tall grass
so vegetation has been added around ponds and water sources to help deter the geese. At
Westwood Hills Nature Center the deer population is growing. Overall, wildlife is doing
well.
Mr. Vaughan advised the Commission of the Native Vegetation Ordinance. This year 157
weed notices were sent, which is lower than past years. Due to the recent rains though,
additional notices are being sent.
Tree planting has occurred in numerous areas in the city. There were 60 trees planted at
the Rec Center on Arbor Day. There will be 75 trees planted in the Nature Center on
September 9. Staff is focusing on vegetation in the Nature Center through the course of
two years. Mr. Vaughan also reviewed the Tree Steward program, to be held in
September. Also, a tree planting will be held on October 28 where 138 trees will be
planted along Minnetonka Boulevard from Hennepin County.
Commissioners reviewed native landscaping and a rendering of Bass Lake preserve. Mr.
Vaughan detailed prescribed burns that took place at Westwood Hills Nature Center,
Lamplighter Park and Twin Lakes Park.
On Saturday, June 17 the city hosted an Ecotacular event at the Rec Center. There were
environmentally friendly activities and demonstrations for all. Mr. Cantor indicated the
event was very nice.
The Commissioners thanked Mr. Vaughan for the update.
c. Commission Sponsored Appreciation Luncheon Discussion
Mr. Hagemann provided a brief overview of the luncheon. The appreciation luncheon is a
sponsored lunch by the Commission for all Parks and Recreation employees. Last year
the bike patrol were also invited as they provide a great deal of service to the parks.
Employees are offered hamburgers, hot dogs, and other items for lunch as a way to
recognize staff and show appreciation. All Commissioners contribute by bringing
something and grilling at Oak Hill Park.
Members discussed dates and decide to hold the luncheon on Thursday, October 5, at the
Oak Hill Park Main Shelter. Ms. Voelker will reserve the facility and email a list of items
provided in past years to the Commissioners.
5. Old Business
a. Fastpitch Softball Association Field Update (Cindy Walsh)
An update on field discussions with the Fastpitch Softball Association recently went to
the City Council, Ms. Walsh advised. Commissioners Hoffmann and Griffin have served
on the task force and indicated the association has been disrespectful.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4l) Page 6
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of August 23, 2017
Staff and the task force met with the landscape architect to determine how the Middle
School property, the primary site that came out of discussions, is used and laid out how
fields could be added to the site. The School District will commit to one fenced field and
two non-fenced fields, which is not acceptable to the Fastpitch Association. The City
Council asked staff to provide revised cost estimates on three options at Aquila Park to
convert an additional field to a fastpitch field (totaling two fastpitch fields) at Aquila
Park. The landscape architect is working on the revised estimates. One item that would
need to be completed at Aquila Park regardless of the field placement is renovating the
lights. Staff will provide options and cost estimates provided by the landscape architect to
the Commissioners at the next PRAC meeting.
6. Staff Communication
None.
7. Member Communication
Commissioner Hagemann provided an experience encountered in Cub Foods where a gentlemen
had a health issue and no one knew how to use an AED. He explained the City is part of Pulse
Point and described how it works. Commissioner Hagemann and his wife were trained on using
and AED and signed up to be part of Pulse Point. If there is an emergency in the vicinity of their
location, they will be notified by Pulse Point and can respond to provide medical assistance. The
Fire Department offers short classes to residents on the use of AED equipment. If interested in
getting trained, commissioners could attend an AED class. Commissioner Hagemann will
inquired with the Fire Department if they’d offer training during one of the Commission
meetings or another date all could attend.
8. Other / Future Agenda Items
Ms. Walsh advised the next regular meeting is scheduled on September 20 but cannot hold
public meetings on Rosh Hashanah. Members discussed dates and decided the next meeting will
be held on Wednesday, October 4, as that’s the first date a quorum could be reached. They will
meet at 6 p.m. in the Rec Center Programming Office.
9. Adjournment
It was moved by Commissioner Hagemann and seconded by Commissioner Cantor to adjourn at
7:54 p.m.
The motion passed 6 - 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Stacy Voelker
Stacy Voelker, Recording Secretary
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Consent Agenda Item: 4m
OFFICIAL MINUTES
Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission
October 2, 2017, 6 p.m.
Rec Center Programming Office
MEMBERS PRESENT: Rich Bluma, Bruce Cantor, George Foulkes, George Hagemann,
Tiffany Hoffmann, Peter May and Elizabeth Griffin
MEMBERS ABSENT:
GUEST(S) PRESENT: Sara Collins, Amy Bruns and Charlie Gross (SLP Fastpitch Association)
Candace Amberg and Ryan Ruttger (WSB & Associates)
STAFF PRESENT: Rick Beane, Parks Superintendent, Meg McMonigal, Principal Planner,
Jennifer Monson, Planner, Cindy Walsh, Director of Operations and
Recreation, Jason West, Recreation Superintendent and Carrie Mandler,
Recording Secretary
1. Call to Order
Commissioner May called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m.
2. Presentations
None.
3. Approval of Minutes
a. August 23, 2017
Commissioner Hagemann made a motion to approve the minutes of August 23, 2017.
Commissioner Foulkes seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 7 – 0.
4. Business
a. Fastpitch Softball Association Field Update
Commissioner Griffin opened the discussion. She stated the need for a formal vote on field
Options (1A, 1B or 1C) for the Girls Fastpitch Association at the meeting tonight. There
may be a desire on behalf of some to do nothing, she acknowledged, but she strongly
recommended the Commission vote on one of the options presented.
Ms. Amberg gave an overview of each option with time for questions. Ms. Walsh noted
that staff met with representatives from the Fastpitch Association earlier that day and made
a few minor changes. Therefore, revised cost estimates were presented at the meeting.
Option 1A. Ms. Amberg advised this option would include a complete redevelopment of
the Aquila Park ball fields. It would include two fields designed for girl’s fastpitch, and
two adult fields in a new, full pin wheel, configuration. The center of the field areas will
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4 m) Page 2
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2017
be regraded to reverse the drainage. Lighting will be upgraded to new LED lights on all
four fields with irrigation included on all four fields. Ms. Walsh added a survey needs to
be completed. The design requires large amounts of additional soil to be imported. It
includes 30’ high backstops and 8’ high fencing around all four fields, benches for all four
ball fields and a storage shed. In this option, lighting poles would need to be in different
locations and the existing wiring torn up in the regrading process, therefore it will require
rewiring. Ms. Walsh advised lighting will be upgraded on all four fields regardless what
decision is made tonight. In response to a question from Commissioner Foulkes, Ms. Walsh
indicated the rewiring would not create a significant difference in the replacement cost
(estimated to be $20,000). She also advised the ball field redevelopment will require
approximately a year for sod/seed to reestablish. The estimated cost of Option 1A is $3.1
million, however, approximately $500,000 are the lights which are already on the schedule
to be upgraded. In response to a question from Commissioner May, Ms. Walsh advised
construction will take approximately one-and-one-half years. If demolition began in
November of 2017, new games could begin the fall of 2019. Total cost is $3,101,280
including the lights at all four fields.
Option 1B. Ms. Amberg advised field four would not be changed other than a few
improvements that include new irrigation. Field one will be completely refinished at a
higher elevation to improve drainage. The lighting upgrade cost in this estimate only
incudes fields one and four. Commissioner Griffin and Ms. Walsh discussed removing the
cost of the lighting from all estimates and including it at the bottom of each. Ms. Amberg
advised there is not as much regrading in this option as there is in Option 1A. In response
to a question from Commissioner Foulkes, Mr. Beane advised it is usually a three day
process to pull in new irrigation. Estimated cost of Option 1B is $1,088,451 which includes
lights at two of the fields.
Option 1C. Ms. Amberg advised this option would begin reconfiguring the field layout to
start a pin wheel. This option includes complete reconstruction of fields one and four with
drainage reversed. The fence line on field three (an adult softball field) will need to be
shortened to give space so water doesn’t collect on field three. The estimated cost of Option
1C is $1,593,023, including lighting at two of the fields. Commissioner Foulkes noted
fields one and four would not be available for play next summer.
Ms. Walsh requested clarification on the listing of field lighting upgrades in the cost
estimates. A suggestion was made not to include the lighting estimates. Commissioner
Hagemann suggested they be listed separately on the bottom of the grand total.
Commissioner Griffin recalculated each option estimate without the lighting cost. Option
1A is now approximately $2,549,000, Option 1B $838,451, and Option 1C approximately
$1,317,023.
Ms. Bruns noted the contingency percentages will be lower with the cost of lighting
removed from the estimate. Ms. Walsh indicated a revised estimate will be provided to the
City Council at the meeting on October 9 reflecting the decision to remove the lighting,
which all agreed.
Commissioner Griffin invited the St. Louis Park Fastpitch Association to discuss their
thoughts and concerns. Mr. Gross advised he would like to see the full pinwheel. He noted
there have been no field orientation changes in 50 years. He suggested revisiting the needs
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4 m) Page 3
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2017
of all the different groups who use the fields. By shifting the fields, he commented there
would be more room to add other things to the park area. Mr. Beane advised there would
be a very small sliver of extra space. Fences would interfere with the sliding hill so it would
be difficult to add any additional things in the space available in the outfield.
Mr. Gross stated he spoke to the Police Department who are in favor of the pin wheel
configuration. Ms. Walsh advised she spoke with Police Chief Mike Harcey. He advised
there are no problems with the current fields and no need for corrections. She suggested
his comments may have been taken out of context.
Mr. Gross advised the association would like to hold tournaments and sell concessions to
help fund the new facility. He stated the pinwheel formation provides a central location for
people to gather and, therefore, they are more likely to stay in the area. He stated concession
revenue will be lost without a wheel formation. Commissioner Cantor questioned how
much revenue will be lost. Mr. Gross stated 30 – 40 percent.
If Option 1A is not the preferred option, the association will be willing to start with Option
1C. Commissioner Foulkes inquired what amount of funding the schools have committed
to do the field redevelopment project. Ms. Bruns advised it would be difficult to approach
the School District for funding without a prior decision on the fields. She commented the
high school is very supportive of this project. Ms. Collins stated most school districts have
fields on school property; St. Louis Park does not. Ms. Bruns stated the schools are aware
there will likely be funding requests. Commissioner Griffin summarized the school district,
in theory, is supportive of the idea but has not committed to a financial percentage. Mr.
Foulkes inquired what kind amenities the association is be willing to provide. The Fastpitch
Association suggested perhaps a scoreboard, shed or concession stand. Ms. Bruns stated
the infrastructure should be completed by the City.
Ms. Walsh advised that, although associations have donated specific items in the past, most
will commit to a dollar amount or a percentage of the project. Ms. Bruns advised the
association is open to committing a dollar amount. Ms. Collins agreed it would be easier
to commit to a dollar amount.
Commissioner Griffin requested a vote. She then inquired if the Commissioners have the
information they need for a vote. The Fastpitch Association will commit to a monetary
amount. Commissioner Hagemann stated it is important for him to know that dollar
amount. He also advised the school district should have been an active participant in this
discussion. It is a concern to him they are not a part of this funding discussion. Ms. Walsh
advised council will make a decision and may request funding from the school district. Ms.
Griffin advised at this time, the Commission will have to make a decision assuming the
school district will not make a financial commitment.
Mr. Gross stated the association is not interested in Option 1B. Mr. Cantor inquired if
Option 1A or 1C are acceptable and Mr. Gross agreed either Option 1A or 1C would be
acceptable.
In response to a question from Commissioner Bluma, Ms. Walsh advised adult softball has
not been included in any of these discussions.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4 m) Page 4
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2017
Commissioner Bushland commented she has been involved in this process since the
beginning and believes that they have enough fields just not all located at one location.
This a lot of money to spend. Mr. Hagemann agreed there is adequate capacity for fastpitch
softball. If there is an option to support, it will be Option 1B. With that option there won’t
be a whole year of softball lost. It is the least obstructive option. A pinwheel locks the fields
into that formation and there will be no room for change. Option 1B can be changed and is
flexible at some point in the future.
Commission Cantor advised Option 1A is cost prohibitive and the St. Louis Park Fastpitch
Association is not willing to accept Option 1B.
Commissioner Cantor made a motion to recommend Option 1C, Commissioner May
seconded the motion. The motion was defeated on a vote of 2 – 5.
Commissioner Bushland made a motion to recommend Option 1B, Commissioner Foulkes
seconded the motion. The motion passed on a vote of 5 – 1 (Commissioner Cantor
abstained).
Ms. Collins advised the St. Louis Park Fastpitch Association will not support Option 1B
and would not contribute any money towards it. Mr. Gross added that he would rather do
nothing than to spend money on Option 1B. Their first choice is Option 1A and second
choice is option 1C.
b. Twins/Toro Donation for Dakota Park Field Improvements (Rick Beane)
Mr. Beane, Park Superintendent, advised the city received a grant in the amount of $20,000
($10,000 from the Twins and $10,000 from Toro) for field improvements to Dakota Park.
Rain or shine, the work will be completed on Wednesday, October 4. Improvements to be
completed include: drain tile, pitcher mound rebuilds, fence repair, painting, etc. Mr. Beane
indicated the Twins and Toro will take care of everything, including volunteers to assist
with the work. The Mayor will be there to officially accept the donation, however, the
funding is already received and deposited.
c. Westwood Hills Nature Center Update
Mr. West discussed the planning process and how it is moving forward for the new
interpretive center at Westwood Hills Nature Center. As the Commission is aware, HGA
will provide architectural design and RJM will oversee the construction management. Split
Rock Studio will now become a part of the team as the exhibit creation firm. Split Rock
Studio is a very comprehensive firm locally based in Arden Hills. The exhibitors at Split
Rock Studio are very impressed the city is considering exhibits prior to building the facility.
In their experience, many organizations consider exhibits after the building of a facility is
completed.
Jacobson Environmental has identified the wetland areas at Westwood and a surveyor will
come to survey the property. Friday there will be more discussion at the HGA headquarters
with all the players involved. Mr. West showed the Commission a preliminary general
sketch of the building layout as drawn on the bulletin board in the programming office.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4 m) Page 5
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2017
d. Comprehensive Plan 101 (Meg McMonigal and Jennifer Monson)
Ms. McMonigal, Principal Planner, and Ms. Monson, Planner, were introduced to the
Commission. They presented a power point overview of the City of St. Louis Park
Comprehensive Plan as it relates to Parks and Recreation. Section VI, Where We Gather,
and Section VII, Environmental Stewardship, were highlighted for the Commission. The
Comprehensive Plan, she advised, is intended for long-range planning. Ms. McMonigal
advised the plan must be updated every 10 years. She noted there are specific requirements,
but St. Louis Park has added some of their own ideas to make its plan unique.
She noted more environmental emphasis, racial equity and health will be included in the
plan. The plan can be used as a way to discuss all topics within the City as they relate to
each other. It can also be used to forecast growth.
Connect the Park was mentioned as an important initiative. Environmental policies need to
be created or reviewed as well. Racial equity is also a very important initiative in the City.
Ms. McMonigal mentioned some staff have received extensive training in the area of racial
equity. The City is hiring a planning consultant to assist with the update.
Ms. Monson discussed the 2030 plan and the vision for the City of St. Louis Park. There
are many different types of parks. Park amenities charts were inventoried and updated. The
City wants to continue to create high quality parks. There are 52 parks with 792 acres of
park land. There is an increasing interest in walking trails, biking and environmental
stewardship. The parks are pesticide free, bee friendly and there are several edible gardens
in playground areas around the city.
City goals and strategies were discussed at the end of the presentation. Accomplishments
that were acknowledged included: the ROC, continued play structure upgrades and
programming changes/flexibility to meet the changing needs of the community.
Ms. McMonigal pointed out an example of how the current plan helped to place improving
Westwood Hills Nature Center on the radar, and now the process for a new building is
beginning to unfold.
Moving forward, Ms. McMonigal asked, what would the Commissioners like to include or
add to the plan? The planners will visit the Commission every other month with a new
section to review.
Commissioner Hagemann inquired if the City of St. Louis Park might reconsider the
acceptance of cash in lieu of land, for more land. Some areas have very high population
density with no new park areas. He indicated perhaps the developers should be required to
provide more land rather than cash, in areas of dense population. Ms. McMonigal advised
that while there are already many parks within the city, this can certainly be a topic of
discussion. Mr. Hagemann clarified he was concerned about the areas of high population
density. Ms. McMonigal used the West End as an example of an area which includes some
private open space that is available to the public. She also identified how some of the
private rental complexes have designated open space areas of their own by providing decks
and green spaces on their property. Perhaps this item can be a topic for future discussion,
she advised.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 4 m) Page 6
Title: Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission Meeting Minutes of October 2, 2017
Mr. West advised the need to expand the recreation section in the plan to include more
information and the direction the city is going with recreation.
Ms. McMonigal advised the city is receptive to changing markets and trends. The
Commission thanked Ms. McMonigal and Ms. Monson for their update and presentation.
e. Commission Sponsored Appreciation Luncheon Details
Members discussed the upcoming Appreciation lunch to be held Thursday, October 5 at
the Oak Hill Park Main Shelter. They followed a previously created list and divided up the
responsibilities. All Commission members attending the October 2 Commission meeting
indicated they will attend the lunch, at least for part of the time. Commission members
should arrive at 11 a.m. and the food will be served at 11:30 a.m.
5. Staff Communication
Mr. West updated the commission on the success of the Teen ROC event. He advised there were
three bands that played in a comfortable non-competitive atmosphere. In response to a question
form Commissioner Griffin, Mr. West stated the event was well attended. There are plans to have
the event be a part of the summer concert series next summer. Commissioner Griffin suggestion
advertising when school is still in session if the event is moved to the summer.
The next ROC event, Mr. West advised, is the ROC Rummage Sale.
Mr. West informed the Commission the Nature Center’s 36th Annual Halloween Party is fast
approaching and will be held on October 20 and 21.
The new skate park development, Mr. West advised, is progressing. Underneath the park is a water
retention vault. The park should be completed by early November. A grand opening event will be
scheduled for spring 2018.
Mr. West showed the Commission the new fall Parks and Recreation brochure. He made mention
of the cover artist, Chelsey Bahe.
6. Member Communication
None.
7. Other / Future Agenda Items
Next Meeting: Wednesday, December 6, 6 p.m.
8. Adjournment
It was moved by Commissioner Foulkes and seconded by Commissioner Cantor to adjourn at 8:08
p.m. The motion passed 7 - 0.
Respectfully submitted,
Carrie Mandler
Carrie Mandler, Recording Secretary
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Action Agenda Item: 5a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Approve Appointment of Youth Representative to Environment & Sustainability
Commission
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to appoint Katherine Christiansen to the Environment
and Sustainability Commission for the current term ending August 31, 2018.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to appoint Katherine Christiansen to
serve on the Environment & Sustainability Commission as a youth member?
SUMMARY: The City received an application from Katherine Christiansen to serve as a youth
member on the Environment & Sustainability Commission. Ms. Christiansen is currently a
member of the Roots N’ Shoots club at St. Louis Park High School and is extremely interested in
the Climate Action Plan, community gardens, and accessible alternative energy sources.
Youth members are appointed to one-year terms, beginning on August 31 of each year. The
Environment & Sustainability Commission has two youth positions. If Ms. Christiansen’s
appointment is approved, both positions will be filled.
Following appointment by council, Ms. Christiansen will go through an orientation program with
the staff liaison prior to the start of her service.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None.
Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Action Agenda Item: 5b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Approve Appointment of Youth Representative to Parks & Recreation Advisory
Commission
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to appoint Rachel Salzer to the Parks & Recreation
Advisory Commission for the current term ending August 31, 2018.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to appoint Rachel Salzer to serve on
the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission as a youth member?
SUMMARY: The City received an application from Rachel Salzer to serve as a youth member
on the Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission. Ms. Salzer has been a regular volunteer at
Westwood Hills Nature Center and has participated and worked in Parks and Recreation programs.
Youth members are appointed to one-year terms, beginning on August 31 of each year. The Parks
& Recreation Advisory Commission has one youth position and it is currently vacant.
Following appointment by council, Ms. Salzer will go through an orientation program with the
staff liaison prior to the start of her service.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: None.
Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close
the public hearing. Motion to adopt resolution accepting the project report, establishing the 2018
Pavement Management Project (4018-1000), approving plans and specifications, and authorizing
advertisement for bids.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue implementation of the
City’s Pavement Management Program? Does the City Council wish to pursue the installation of
sidewalks, reduce impervious surface, and implement traffic management measures recommended
as a part of our annual Pavement Management Project?
SUMMARY: The annual Pavement Management Project rehabilitates several miles of local
residential streets. This year, the project is located in Pavement Management Area 6, (the
Elmwood, Brooklawns, and Brookside Neighborhoods). Street rehabilitation work consists of
removing and replacing the existing bituminous pavement and replacing portions of concrete curb
and gutter as needed. Other work includes watermain replacement, storm and sanitary sewer
repairs.
Also included in this year’s project are recommendations related to the Living Streets Policy
including, sidewalk installation, traffic management, street narrowing, tree preservation, and storm
water management.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: These projects are included in the City’s CIP
for 2018 and will be paid for using, franchise fee revenues, utility funds, and General Obligation
Charter Bonds. The total cost estimate for the project is $5,501,674.40. Additional information on
the breakdown of the funding can be found later in this report.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion
Resolution
January 16 Special Study Session Report (available upon request or at
link: https://www.stlouispark.org/home/showdocument?id=8148)
Attachment #1: Elmwood & Brooklawns Sidewalk and Traffic Control
Recommendations
Attachment #2: Resident Feedback- Sidewalks
Attachment #3: Resident Feedback- Street Widths
Attachment #4: Resident Feedback- Traffic Modifications
Attachment #5: Resident Feedback – Parking
Attachment #6: Petition- No Sidewalk on Zarthan
Attachment #7: Petition- No Two Way on Oxford
Attachment #8: Petition- Keep Aldersgate Road Open
Attachment #9: Petition- No Sidewalk on Brunswick Ave S
Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, Project Engineer
Ben Manibog, Transportation Engineer
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 2
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
DISCUSSION
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This year’s project is located in Area 6 of the City’s eight pavement
management areas. It includes work in the Elmwood, Brooklawns and Brookside Neighborhoods.
The project includes street rehabilitation, curb and gutter replacement, watermain and water
service replacement, storm sewer construction, installation of sidewalk and traffic control
modification. Other streets will have random curb and gutter replacement and new asphalt
surfacing.
Information regarding this project was shared with the City Council at the January 16 study
session. Attached is the study session report which includes recommendations for the elements to
include in this transportation project. A summary of the information in the report:
• Individual evaluation sheets for each of the 49 sidewalk segments- These individual
evaluation sheets contain information on the proposed sidewalk design, maintenance
responsibilities, impacts (trees, retaining walls, etc.), cost and staff recommendations.
• Proposed street widths- staff is proposing to narrow the streets in this neighborhood in the
interest of reducing speed, reducing impervious, constructing sidewalks, minimizing
impacts to trees, and reducing the impacts to private properties.
• Parking restrictions- streets less than 28 feet are recommended for parking restriction on
one side; this is consistent with city standards for local streets
• Traffic control modifications- these modifications improve access to the neighborhood,
eliminate cut through traffic on private streets, reduce speeds and traffic volumes.
• Resident feedback received before study session and the traffic study report.
Feedback received from residents since the January 16th study session is attached to this report.
POLICY: The recommendations for this project are consistent with the following participant
feedback from city planning initiatives and City Council policy direction:
Vision 3.0 and Neighborhood Listening Sessions for 2040 Comprehensive Plan (2017/18)
In 2017, the city had a yearlong public engagement process to better understand what is important
to our residents. The following are statements taken from these reports and reflect the themes that
we heard frequently from the participants.
• Residents value getting around town safely and easily
• The community continues to request the expansion of the sidewalk network
• Residents desire a safe and connected system of sidewalks
• Protect and preserve our trees
• Add & maintain sidewalks
• Improve sidewalk/ trail safety
• Improve intersection safety
• Reduce/ calm vehicle traffic
• Water quality
• Tree planting, replacement, treatment
• Add green spaces
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 3
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
Living Street Policy (Draft 3/27/17)
• Enhance Walking/ Biking Conditions and Connections- The project proposes to close gaps
in the sidewalk systems along the street segments. It improves access to commercial nodes,
parks and transit. Narrowing streets shortens the distance for pedestrians crossing the street
at intersections.
• Traffic Management- implement traffic controls to improve access, reduce cut through
traffic and vehicle speeds in neighborhoods. Traffic calming techniques used: street
narrowing, neighborhood traffic circles, and bump outs at intersections.
• Improve the quality and reduce the quantity of stormwater runoff- reduce the widths of
streets to reduce the volume of storm water that enters the City’s storm water system.
Install storm water treatment to improve the quality of storm water runoff.
• Support the urban forest- when considering construction of sidewalks; modify designs to
preserve mature trees in the right- of- way.
• Improve the aesthetics of streets- Install additional street trees in the right- of- way.
• Reduce life cycle cost- by reducing the street widths, we will reduce initial construction
costs and future maintenance costs.
Climate Action Plan (On 2/5/18 agenda for approval)
Section 6.4 Enable Reduction of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) from single- occupancy
vehicles
• By filling gaps in the sidewalk network, we will create a safe space for pedestrians of all
ages and abilities in the right- of- way. It improves access to commercial nodes, parks and
transit. Encouraging people to walk to these locations and not drive.
• Continue to modify land use to encourage alternative modes of transportation, consistent
with the city’s complete streets policy and any future living streets policy (section 6.4.1)
• Consider greenhouse gas emission in planning resource allocation and right- of- way
management decisions (Section 6.4.7)
• Improving the City’s average walk score (Section 6.4.8)
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: The following sections will cover the topics and questions
that were brought up by the city council at the January 16 Study session.
Street Widths
Staff is recommending narrowing the street widths and restricting parking on 39th Street and
Zarthan Avenue in order to minimize impacts to trees and private properties as a result of the
proposed sidewalk construction. For those reasons, if the sidewalks are not approved by City
Council for construction in 2018, Staff still recommends that street narrowing be approved. By
narrowing the street now, and the sidewalk is approved at a later date, the sidewalk could be
installed with minimal impacts and city cost in the future.
The City Council had questions on the research and data to support that narrower streets are safer
for drivers and pedestrians. According to research by the National Association of City
Transportation Officials (NACTO):
Research has shown that narrower lane widths can effectively manage speeds without
decreasing safety, and that wider lanes do not correlate to safer streets. Slowing traffic
reduces the severity of accidents, reduces noise and generally improves the livability of
residential streets. Moreover, wider travel lanes also increase exposure and crossing
distance for pedestrians at intersections and midblock crossings.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 4
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
Streets
The City Council had questions regarding the intersection of Zarthan Avenue and Oxford Avenue.
Residents have commented that due to the slope of Zarthan Avenue approaching the intersection
and blocked sight lines in the southwest quadrant the intersection, it is difficult to stop when
driving northbound on Zarthan Avenue.
Due to constraints (driveways, trees and yard grades), staff is not able to reduce the street grade
by a large margin however staff is recommending the removal of the retaining wall and tree in the
southwest quadrant. The retaining wall is failing and needs to be reconstructed; in addition it needs
to be removed for the watermain replacement work on Oxford Street. By removing the tree and
reconstructing the wall 11 feet behind the curb, the sightlines will be better and drivers will be able
to see cars approaching the all way stop intersection.
According to the Police accident records, there are two (2) accidents reported at this intersection
in the last 5 years. One of these accidents was due to icing at the intersection. Staff will forward
this information to the Operations Department for observation and appropriate winter
maintenance.
Storm Water
Staff has identified opportunities to install storm water best management practices (BMPs) in order
to reduce volume and improve storm water quality. These improvements will be installed as a part
of the project. This neighborhood drains to the basin in Bass Lake Preserve. One of the City’s
goals for the Bass Lake Preserve is to reduce the volume of water going to the basin. As a part of
this project, staff is proposing to install SAFL Baffles on 39th Street and an underground
infiltration area on Brunswick Avenue (between Oxford Street and 37th Street) to reduce storm
runoff and reduce pollutants.
Sidewalks
The City Council requested additional information regarding the following sidewalk segments:
Sidewalk Segment #6- Brunswick Ave from Excelsior Blvd to Brookview Drive (East side)
This sidewalk segment is recommended for construction. .
Staff recommendations for sidewalk installation was made based on a number of factors. The
following is the information that staff used to reach its recommendation for this sidewalk segment:
• The street has more than 150 vehicles traveling on it (230 ADT)
• The street has existing sidewalk on 28% of the block.
• There is limited impacts to trees and vegetation. The sidewalk requires the removal of one
tree (2”).
• The sidewalk segment has less impacts than the west side of the street.
For the reasons listed above, staff is recommending the construction of the proposed sidewalk
segment
Sidewalk Segment #15- Dakota Ave from Oxford St to 37th St (East side)
This sidewalk segment is recommended for construction.
Staff recommendations for sidewalk installation was made based on a number of factors. The
following is the information that staff used to reach its recommendation for this sidewalk segment:
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 5
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
• The installation of this sidewalk would complete the missing sidewalk gap between Oxford
Street and 37th Street.
• The sidewalk segment would complete the connectivity of the existing sidewalk system.
The sidewalk segment would allow a pedestrian to walk around the block without entering
the street.
• The cost per foot is one of the lower costs in the project.
• The sidewalk does require the removal of one tree (15”).
For the reasons listed above, staff is recommending the construction of the proposed sidewalk
segment.
Sidewalk Segment #19- Goodrich Ave from Colorado Ave to Brunswick Ave (South side)
This sidewalk segment is recommended for construction.
Staff recommendations for sidewalk installation was made based on a number of factors. The
following is the information that staff used to reach its recommendation for this sidewalk segment:
• The street has existing sidewalk on 37% of the south side of the block.
• The sidewalk segment would complete the connectivity of the existing sidewalk system.
• The sidewalk segment would create a continuous sidewalk on the south side of Goodrich
Avenue.
• The sidewalk does require the removal of 6 trees (1” to 7”)
For the reasons listed above, staff is recommending the construction of the proposed sidewalk
segment.
Sidewalk Segment #20- Goodrich Ave from Yosemite Ave to Wooddale Ave (South side)
This sidewalk segment is recommended for construction.
Staff recommendations for sidewalk installation was made based on a number of factors. The
following is the information that staff used to reach its recommendation for this sidewalk segment:
• The street has existing sidewalk on 45% of the south side of the block.
• The sidewalk segment would complete the connectivity of the existing sidewalk system.
• The sidewalk segment would create a continuous sidewalk on the south side of Goodrich
Avenue.
• The sidewalk does not require the removal of trees.
For the reasons listed above, staff is recommending the construction of the proposed sidewalk
segment.
Sidewalk Segment #26, 28, 30- Zarthan Ave from 39th St to Center Park (East side)
These sidewalk segments are recommended for construction.
Staff recommendations for sidewalk installation was made based on a number of factors. The following
is the information that staff used to reach its recommendations for these sidewalk segments:
• The sidewalk segments would complete the connectivity of the existing sidewalk system.
• The sidewalk segments would create a continuous sidewalk on the east side of Zarthan
Avenue.
• The sidewalks would create a continuous connection for the neighborhood to Center Park,
transit on Excelsior, and commercial nodes.
• The sidewalks have minimal impacts and do not require the removal of trees.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 6
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
• Due to the connections created by this sidewalk, it is recommended to be designated as a
Community Sidewalk (city maintained).
Zarthan Avenue between 39th Street and Center Park is proposed to be narrowed from 30 feet to
25 feet to install a sidewalk on the east side and ensure no trees are removed. Staff recommends
no parking on the west side of Zarthan Avenue.
If the sidewalk segments on the east side of Zarthan Avenue from 39th Street to Center Park is
approved for construction, staff recommends the existing sidewalk on the east side of Zarthan
Avenue between Excelsior Boulevard and 39th Street be changed from a Neighborhood Sidewalk
to a Community Sidewalk. In the January 16 study session report, this existing sidewalk segment
was not shown as Community sidewalk so attached to this report is an updated map showing
sidewalk maintenance designations.
For the reasons listed above, staff is recommending the construction of the proposed sidewalk
segment.
Sidewalk Segment #39-41, 43, 45–39th St from Alabama Ave to Webster Ave (South side)
These sidewalk segments are recommended for construction.
Staff recommendations for sidewalk installation was made based on a number of factors. The
following is the information that staff used to reach its recommendations for these sidewalk
segments:
• The sidewalk segments (#39, 41, 43, 45) would create a continuous sidewalk on the south
side of 39th Street from Alabama Avenue to Webster Avenue.
o It is recommended to be designated as a Community Sidewalk (city maintained).
In general, for city snow removal and pedestrian connectivity, staff recommends
the sidewalk be continuous on one side of the street for its entirety.
o The sidewalk segments on the south side would connect to the sidewalks on Zarthan
Avenue, Yosemite Avenue, Xenwood Avenue and Webster Avenue.
o The sidewalk segments on the south side have minimal impacts and does not require
the removal of trees.
• 39th Avenue, between Alabama and Webster Avenue, is proposed to be narrowed from 30
feet to 26 feet to install a sidewalk on the south side and ensure a low impact design. Staff
recommends no parking on the south side of 39th Avenue.
• The sidewalk segment (#40) on the north side of 39th Street between Alabama Avenue and
Zarthan Avenue fills a gap.
o It is recommended as a neighborhood sidewalk (resident maintained).
o The majority of the sidewalk is already in place (62%).
o There are minimal impacts (1 tree removal).
o There is support from property owners
For the reasons listed above, staff is recommending the construction of the proposed sidewalk
segments.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 7
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
Sidewalk Maintenance Designation
The City Council had questions regarding the definition of designation for maintenance. What
follows is the definitions used to designate maintenance responsibility for sidewalk segments:
Community Sidewalks are located on a street that is directly adjacent to an activity node.
They make major connections within the City and to neighboring cities’ systems. These
pedestrian facilities (sidewalks and/or trails) are spaced roughly at ¼-mile intervals across
the city. Most of these sidewalks are located along collector and arterial roadways that have
high traffic volumes. In general, activity nodes are community or area destinations such as;
the library, schools, retail areas, parks, regional trails, transit nodes, and places of worship.
Snow removal on community sidewalks are the city’s responsibility. Due to current snow
removal equipment, the city requires the sidewalk be at least 5 foot wide minimum (6 feet
preferred).
Neighborhood Sidewalks are all other sidewalks in the City. They provide accessibility
for pedestrians within the immediate area and feed into the Community Sidewalk system.
These sidewalks are generally located on lower volume roads.
Snow removal on neighborhood sidewalk are the property owner’s responsibility.
Staff has made recommendations for maintenance designation for each of the sidewalks under
consideration. Maintenance designation is a policy decision.
Of the 1.13 miles of recommended sidewalk/trails, 0.52 miles are recommended to be designated
as Community Sidewalks (city maintained).
ADA Sidewalk Requirements
The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) design requirements state that a sidewalk needs to be
at least 5 feet wide to accommodate wheelchair users. In general, 5 feet is the minimum width for
wheelchair users to turn around and 6 feet wide is the minimum to pass other wheelchairs. When
the sidewalk is at the back of the curb, staff recommends a 6 foot wide sidewalk. This provides
the most comfortable design for users of all ages and abilities.
On-Street Parking Changes on 36th and Brunswick west of Alabama
The Council had questions about the staff recommendation to restrict the parking surrounding the
Nordic Ware and Jonny Pops building near Alabama Avenue & W. 36th Street. The specific
concern was in regards to parking during events hosted at Jorvig Park.
The Operations and Recreation Department was contacted and they do not have any concerns for
the proposed parking restrictions. The St. Louis Park Historical Society, which hosts events in the
depot, also did not have concerns with the proposed parking restrictions.
There are no changes to the proposed parking restriction recommendations previously provided in
the study session attachments.
Neighborhood Traffic Circles (NTCs)
During the course of the traffic study, the NTCs used in the Elmwood and Brooklawns
neighborhoods did not alter the existing signage. Existing stop signs remained and a yield sign was
added to any approaches that did not have a sign.
Video observation was completed at some of the NTCs to understand driver behavior at these
intersections. The video showed low stop sign compliance at these intersections. Resident
feedback showed that drivers were also confused with stop signs and yield signs appearing at the
same intersection.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 8
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
Staff recommends that at intersections where a NTC is installed, all existing stop signs be removed
and yield signs be installed at all legs of the intersection. Staff does not recommend stop signs at
intersections with an NTC.
Weight Restrictions
There are two-ton axle weight restrictions on the majority of streets in the Brooklawns and
Elmwood neighborhoods. These restrictions were installed in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s. At
that time, the pavement was not designed to support vehicles over that weight. Since then, the
roads have been reconstructed, and are designed for vehicles with an axle weight up to six (6) tons.
The road reconstruction associated with this project is also designed for vehicles with an axle
weight of six (6) tons.
This neighborhood-wide restriction is the only one of its kind within the City. Additionally, such
a restriction technically prevents vehicles such as UPS trucks, FedEx trucks, garbage trucks,
landscaping vehicles, and school buses from using the streets. Staff recommends that the two-ton
axle weight restrictions be removed from the Brooklawns and Elmwood neighborhoods.
TRAFFIC CONTROL CHANGES: There are a number of traffic control changes included in
the staff recommendations. By approving the attached resolution, the Council is approving these
changes. The city maintains a database of resolutions enacting traffic controls. To ensure that
there is no confusion in our record keeping, additional resolutions clarifying the traffic control
changes will be brought to the City Council for approval on the February 21 consent agenda.
Individual resolutions are adopted for the following traffic control changes:
• Stop signs
• Yield signs
• On Street parking restrictions
• Weight restrictions
IMPACTS, EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF ENTRY: The proposed roadway, utility and
sidewalk construction activities for 2018 are challenging to build in a fully developed community
such St. Louis Park. The design and implementation of these segments require flexibility in design
standards and creativity in design alternatives. Each sidewalk segment is unique and requires its
own set of design solutions to minimize and mitigate impacts to the community.
The designs presented to the residents and in this report acknowledge that tree loss and temporary
impacts to private property are two very sensitive issues. The proposed design endeavors to
balance the need for increased pedestrian facilities within the City with the impacts to residents
who live along these proposed sidewalks, trails, and bikeways. If these projects are approved, staff
will work with residents to obtain the easements and right of entry documents necessary to
construct the various sidewalk and trails.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 9
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The following table outlines the estimated
project cost and anticipated funding sources for this project.
Construction
Estimate Engineering Total
Pavement Management Fund $2,222,366.09 $333,354.91 $2,555,721.00
Water Fund $1,492,749.00 $149,274.90 $1,642,023.90
Storm Sewer Fund $294,636.00 $29,463.60 $324,099.60
Sanitary Sewer Fund $172,553.00 $17,255.30 $189,808.30
Sidewalk (General Obligation
Charter Bonds) $475,018.00 $95,003.60 $570,021.60
Fiber (General Obligation
Charter Bonds) $200,000.00 $20,000.00 $220,000.00
Total $4,857,322.09 $644,352.31 $5,501,674.40
NEXT STEPS: The proposed schedule for the project to facilitate construction completion in
2018 is as follows:
Public Hearing and Approval of Plans / Authorization to Bid February 5, 2018
Advertise for Bid February 2018
Bid Opening March 2018
Council Awards Construction Bids Early April 2018
Construction May to November 2018
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 10
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
RESOLUTION NO. 18-___
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT,
ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 4018-1000
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. 4018-1000
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Project Manager related to the 2018 Pavement Management Program.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 4018-1000 is hereby accepted.
2. Such improvements as proposed are necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in
the Project Report.
3. The proposed project, designated as Project No. 4018-1000, is hereby established and
ordered.
4. The following new sidewalk segments are hereby established and ordered for construction
Number Description
Sidewalk
Classification Recommended at
this time
6
Brunswick Avenue- Excelsior Boulevard to
Brookview Drive (East Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
11
Brunswick Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich
Avenue (West Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
12
Brunswick Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford
Street (East Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
13
Brunswick Avenue- Oxford Street to 37th Street
(East Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
14
Brunswick Avenue/36th Street- 37th Street to
Alabama Avenue (East/South Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
15
Dakota Avenue- Oxford Street to 37th Street (East
Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
18
Oxford Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue
(South Side)
Community
Yes
19
Goodrich Avenue- Colorado Avenue to Brunswick
Avenue (South Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
20
Goodrich Avenue- Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale
Avenue (South Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
26
Zarthan Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street
(East Side)
Community
Yes
28
Zarthan Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich
Avenue (East Side)
Community
Yes
30
Zarthan Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street
(East Side)
Community
Yes
32
Cambridge Street- Alabama Avenue to Park
Driveway (South Side)
Community
Yes
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 11
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
34
Cambridge Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite
Avenue (South Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
39
39th Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue
(South Side)
Community
Yes
40
39th Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue
(North Side)
Neighborhood
Yes
41
39th Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue
(South Side)
Community
Yes
43
39th Street- Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue
(South Side)
Community
Yes
45
39th Street- Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue
(South Side)
Community
Yes
5. The following sidewalk segments are not recommended for construction with this project:
Number Description
Sidewalk
Classification Recommended at
this time
1
Brookview Drive- Colorado Avenue to Brunswick
Avenue (South Side)
Neighborhood
No
2
Brookview Drive- Colorado Avenue to Brunswick
Avenue (North Side)
Neighborhood
No
3
Brookview Drive- Brunswick Avenue to Alabama
Avenue (South Side)
Neighborhood
No
4
Brookview Drive- Brunswick Avenue to Alabama
Avenue (North Side)
Neighborhood
No
5
Brunswick Avenue- Excelsior Boulevard to Brookview
Drive (West Side)
Neighborhood
No
7
Brunswick Avenue- Brookview Drive to RR Tracks
(West Side)
Neighborhood
No
8
Brunswick Avenue- Brookview Drive to RR Tracks
(East Side)
Neighborhood
No
9
Brunswick Avenue- RR Tracks to Cambridge Street
(West Side)
Neighborhood
No
10
Brunswick Avenue- RR Tracks to Cambridge Street
(East Side)
Neighborhood
No
16
Colorado Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street
(East Side)
Neighborhood
No
17
Colorado Avenue- Oxford Street to 37th Street (East
Side)
Neighborhood
No
21
Wooddale Avenue- Dead End to Cambridge Street
(West Side)
Neighborhood
No
22
Wooddale Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich
Avenue (West Side)
Neighborhood
No
23
Yosemite Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street
(West Side)
Neighborhood
No
24
Yosemite Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich
Avenue (West Side)
Neighborhood
No
25
Zarthan Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street (West
Side)
Neighborhood
No
27
Zarthan Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich
Avenue (West Side)
Neighborhood
No
29
Zarthan Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street
(West Side)
Neighborhood
No
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 12
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
31
Cambridge Street- Brunswick Avenue to Alabama
Avenue (South Side)
Neighborhood
No
33
Cambridge Street- Park Driveway to Zarthan Avenue
(South Side)
Neighborhood
No
35
Cambridge Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite
Avenue (North Side)
Neighborhood
No
36
Cambridge Street- Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale
Avenue (South Side)
Neighborhood
No
37 39th Street- Dead End to Alabama Avenue (South Side) Neighborhood No
38 39th Street- Dead End to Alabama Avenue (North Side) Neighborhood No
42
39th Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue
(North Side)
Neighborhood
No
44
39th Street- Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue
(North Side)
Neighborhood
No
46
39th Street- Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue
(North Side)
Neighborhood
No
47
42nd Street- Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue (South
Side)
Neighborhood
No
48
42nd Street- Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue (North
Side)
Neighborhood
No
49
Vermont Street- Yosemite Avenue to Vernon Avenue
(South Side)
Neighborhood
No
6. The following street widths are hereby established and ordered for construction
Watermain Streets:
Street Segment Existing (ft.) Proposed (ft.)
Colorado Avenue (Goodrich Avenue to 37th Street) 30 28
Brunswick Avenue (Excelsior Boulevard to 37th Street) 30 28
Xenwood Avenue (Excelsior Boulevard to 39th Street) 30 28
37th Street (Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue) 30 28
Oxford Street (Dakota Avenue to Alabama Avenue) 30 28
39th Street (dead end to Alabama Avenue) 30 28
39th Street (Alabama Avenue to Webster Avenue) 30 26
Dakota Avenue (Oxford Street to 37th Street) 26 26
37th Street (Dakota Avenue to Colorado Avenue) 20 20
Oxford Street (Alabama Avenue to Wooddale Avenue) 30 30
Vernon Avenue (city limits to 41st Street) 26 26
Non-Watermain Streets:
Street Segment Existing (ft.) Proposed (ft.)
Zarthan Avenue (39th street to Center Park) 30 25
Brunswick Ave/36th Street (37th Street to Alabama Ave) 30 30
Zarthan Avenue (Center Park to Oxford Street) 30 30
Xenwood Avenue (39th Street to dead end) 30 30
Wooddale Avenue (dead end to Wooddale Avenue) 40 40
37th Street (Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue) 28 28
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 13
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
Goodrich Avenue (Alabama Avenue to Yosemite Avenue) 40 40
Cambridge Street (Zarthan Avenue to Wooddale Avenue) 30 30
41st Street (Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue) 34.5 34.5
7. The following parking restrictions are hereby established and ordered
Street Segment
39th Street (Alabama Avenue to Webster Avenue) No Parking- South Side
Zarthan Avenue (39th Street to Center Park) No Parking- West Side
36th Street (Alabama Avenue to Brunswick
Avenue)
No Parking – South Side
No Parking – North Side except excluding
area across from curbed island
Brunswick Avenue (36th Street to 37th Street) No Parking – East Side at the driveway access
No Parking – West Side at the driveway
access
8. The following Traffic Control Modifications are hereby established and ordered
Modification Location Recommen
dation
Traffic Circle with Yield
Signs
Brunswick Avenue & Oxford Street Yes
Traffic Circle with Yield
Signs
Brunswick Avenue & Goodrich Avenue Yes
Curb Extension Brunswick Avenue & Cambridge Street Yes
Curb Extension Brunswick Avenue & 37th Street Yes
Curb Extension with
Crosswalk
Alabama Avenue & 36th Street Yes
Close two south access
aprons
Aldersgate Church Yes
Convert to 2-way Street Oxford Street (Zarthan Ave to Wooddale Ave) Yes
All Way Stop Signs Oxford Street & Zarthan Avenue Yes
Remove 2-ton Restrictions Elmwood Neighborhood Yes
Remove 2-ton Restrictions Brooklawns Neighborhood Yes
9. The plans and specifications for the making of these improvements, as prepared under the
direction of the Engineering Director, or designee, are approved. The Engineering Director
is allowed to make adjustments to these plans and specifications, such as narrowing the
width of boulevards or sidewalks, in cases where special circumstances exist in the field,
such as the location of trees, provided that these adjustments will make a material
difference in addressing any special circumstances that may exist.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 14
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)
10. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official City
newspaper and in relevant industry publications an advertisement for bids for the making
of said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement
shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received by
the City Clerk, and that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City
Clerk and accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount
of the bid.
11. The Engineering Director, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council
shortly after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager
Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
aaPP
PP
PP
PP
PP
+¢
+¢
VV
VV
``
+¢--VV
")3
¬«100
41ST
ST W
OXFO
R
D
ST
PARK CENTER BLVDALABAMAAVESSERVICE DR H I G H W AY 7
36TH ST W
CAMBRIDGE ST
AUTO
CLUB WAY
COLORADOAVE SYOSEMITE AVE SWO
OD
D
A
L
E
AVEXENWOODAVESXENWOODAVESGOODRICH AVE
XENWOODAVESCOLORADOAVESDAKOTAAVESBRUNSWICKAVESBRUNSWICKAVESWOODDALE AVEEDGEWOODAVES39TH ST W
BROOKVIEW DR
39TH ST W
36TH ST W
ALABAMAAVESDAKOTAAVESOXFORD ST
YOSEMITEAVESZARTHANAVES37TH ST W
GOODRICH AVE PRIVATE RDBROOKSIDEAVESCOLORADOAVESWEBSTERAVESVERNONAVESPRIVATE RD
WEBSTERAVESWEBSTERAVESHOSPITALSERVICEDR¯
2018 PM- Sidewalk and Traffic Control Recommendations(Elmwood and Brooklawns Neighborhood)
Sidewalk Recommendations
Not Recommended in 2018:
SidewalkRecommended for 2018
Sidewalk (City Maintained)
Sidewalk (Resident Maintained)Existing Sidewalk and Trails:
Existing Sidewalk (Resident Maintained)
Existing Sidewalk (City/Contract Maintained)
Existing Trails
City Limits 44th St. W.
Traffic ControlRecommendations
Not Recommended in 2018:
PP Traffic Circle
--Center MedianRecommended for 2018
PP Traffic Circle with Yield Signs
VV Curb Extensions+¢Road Closed
``All Way Stop
aa Convert to 2-Way Traffic
CROSSWALK
LEFT TURN LANEON WOODDALE AVE
Open House #2- Jan. 17, 2018
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 15
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 16
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 17
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 18
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 19
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 20
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 21
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 22
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 23
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 24
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 25
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 26
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 27
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 28
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 29
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 30
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 31
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 32
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 33
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 34
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 35
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 36
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 37
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 38
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 39
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 40
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 41
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 42
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 43
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 44
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 45
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 46
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 47
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 48
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 49
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 50
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 51
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 52
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 53
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 54
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 55
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 56
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 57
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 58
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 59
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 60
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 61
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 62
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 63
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 64
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 65
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 66
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 67
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 68
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 69
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 70
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 71
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 72
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 73
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 74
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 75
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 76
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 77
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 78
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 79
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 80
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 81
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 82
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 83
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 84
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 85
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 86
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 87
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 88
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 89
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 90
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 91
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 92
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 93
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 94
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 95
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 96
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 97
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 98
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 99
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 100
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 101
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 102
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 103
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 104
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 105
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 106
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 107
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 108
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 109
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 110
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 111
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 112
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 113
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 6a)
Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project (4018-1000)Page 114
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Action Agenda Item: 8a
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Climate Action Plan
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Climate Action Plan
for the City of St. Louis Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Is the Climate Action Plan commensurate and in keeping with
the Council’s overall goals and vision relating to the environment?
SUMMARY: The proposed Climate Action Plan (CAP) provides a roadmap to achieving the
ambitious goal of achieving carbon neutrality by 2040. The goals, strategies, and actions in the
plan outline a bold vision on the direction the city needs to follow in order to combat the risk of
climate destruction for future generations. This plan can be modified over time as needed, in order
to keep pace with an assortment of changes and advancements the future might bring.
The full cost of implementing the CAP cannot be accurately calculated for many reasons, including
future polices/regulations adopted by the federal or state government, the unknown future costs of
energy sources, and the potential changes in technologies which may provide additional pathways
to carbon neutrality. However, projects or actions in the first 1-2 years can be estimated and
budgeted for and this will be done as part of our budgeting processes. It should also be noted that
most energy-related projects result in an economic benefit that more than covers the cost of the
project and often generates huge savings after the payback period has ended.
This plan was developed in partnership with the Environment & Sustainability Commission, I-
Matter, additional community volunteers, and city staff. At the study session on January 29, 2018,
the City Council directed staff to move ahead with formal adoption of the plan.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Financial considerations will be developed
in the more detailed planning stages and incorporated into budget documents for future
consideration by Council.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in environmental
stewardship. We will increase environmental consciousness and responsibility in all areas of city
business.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Climate Action Plan
Prepared by: Shannon Pinc, Environment & Sustainability Coordinator
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, HR Director/ Deputy City Manager
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Title: Climate Action Plan
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
RESOLUTION ADOPTING ST. LOUIS PARK CLIMATE ACTION PLAN
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park is committed to a plan that attempts to
significantly reduce citywide greenhouse gas emissions to levels that will protect future
generations from the risk of climate destruction; and
WHEREAS, The City of St. Louis Park understands that this plan is a bold vision that is
necessary to implement in a timely manner, even when all costs and resources needed are not fully
understood at this time; and
WHEREAS, the Climate Action Plan will be an evolving document that will be updated
periodically to show progress towards goals, to include new technologies as they become viable,
and to allow for flexibility for when other opportunities arise, or when financial realities may make
achieving the goals in the Plan unrealistic; and
WHEREAS, the City will continue to work in partnership with the Environment &
Sustainability Commission, the youth in our community, and residents, businesses, nonprofits,
educational and religious organizations; and
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park will work towards achieving climate neutrality
using ingenuity, innovation and courageous determination while implementing strategies and
actions; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park that it adopts the St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan as proposed.
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
2040
St. Louis Park
Climate Action Plan
February 2018
Setting a course toward carbon neutrality
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 3
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 1
Acknowledgements
The St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan is the result of collaboration between representatives from community
members from various parts of the city, members of the Environment & Sustainability Commission, youth
members of the Roots & Shoot Environmental Club at St. Louis Park High School, and with iMatter — a nonprofit
supporting young people wanting to end the climate crisis. The City of St. Louis Park would like to thank all who
have contributed to this project, as it would not have been possible without your time, effort, and passion.
Elected Officials: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller,
Margaret Rog
Former Elected Officials: Gregg Lindberg, Sue Sanger
Youth Team: Larry Kraft, Executive Director & Chief Mentor at iMatter, Ethan Brown, Philip Djerf, Owen Geier,
Nathan Kempf, Meili Liss, Anya Lindell Paulson, Leila Raymond, Anna Roethler, Sofia Roloff, Sophia Skinner
Environment & Sustainability Commission: Susan Bloyer, Nicole Ciulla, Stefan Collinet, Terry Gips, Ryan Griffin,
Claire Lukens, Julie Rappaport, Keir Steigler, Lukas Wrede
Former Commissioners: Chris Anderson, Mark Eilers, Cindy Larson O’Neil, Nancy Rose, Jayne Stevenson, Judy
Voigt, Paul Zeigle
Prepared for the City of St. Louis Park by:
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 4
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 2
Letter from the Youth of St. Louis Park
Dear Neighbors,
We are St. Louis Park High School students from the Roots and Shoots Environmental Club. In March of 2016, in
partnership with iMatter, we presented a Youth Climate Report Card and asked the St. Louis Park City Council to
adopt a Climate Inheritance Resolution demonstrating the city's commitment to protect our future and the lives
of generations to come. That Climate Inheritance Resolution passed and has led to this Climate Action Plan.
The climate crisis will have a huge impact on our future. An inadequate response now will cause dangerous
economic and environmental disruptions, many of which are already being felt around the globe. But we see
this as an opportunity to rethink our current actions and imagine a better, more sustainable future.
By committing to reach net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2040, the city will be on a path to no longer
contribute to the climate crisis. St. Louis Park has an opportunity to be a leader in the movement to restore a
healthy climate and set the standard for the rest of the state and country.
We are proud of St. Louis Park and the City Council for this Climate Action Plan and for supporting
environmental stewardship – there is much left to
do! Accomplishing the goals of the Climate Action
Plan will require the participation of citizens,
businesses, and organizations throughout our
community. We envision St. Louis Park as a resilient
and healthy city for generations to come, and for
this to happen, all of us have to be involved.
So, St. Louis Park, we challenge you to have the
creativity and courage to imagine a new future with
us. A future with clean, renewable energy, non-
polluting forms of transportation, minimized waste,
and a renewed appreciation of our reliance on
nature.
Signed,
Lukas Wrede, on behalf of the SLP High School Roots and Shoots Club and iMatter
“The time to act is now… we shouldn’t have to be afraid of our future.”
–Jayne Stevenson, Class of 2017
“We believe in a better future for St. Louis Park.”
–Lukas Wrede, Class of 2018
“The time is now to come together as a united force, to insure a livable future for us, for your children, for your
grandchildren, and for the generations to come. The time is now to create a sustainable future.”
–Sophia Skinner, Class of 2017
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 5
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 3
Letter from the Environment and Sustainability Commission
To Our Neighbors,
The St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan is a critical element in our vision for a sustainable city. It is a tremendous
milestone for St. Louis Park and reflects the environmental leadership of our citizens, staff, and elected officials,
as well as our commitment to the youth of our community and planet. This plan is in full alignment with, and
builds upon, the many years of environmental and conservation leadership of the City of St. Louis Park. Through
the Environmental and Sustainability Commission’s four-year existence, we have worked to further build
consensus that climate change is a core challenge that we as a city must collectively address. This plan
represents many contributions from commission members and the broader community.
Global climate change is one of the most challenging problems we will face in the twenty-first century. The
urgency with which we must act decisively on this issue is unprecedented, and cities like ours will be the leaders
that can enact meaningful change. The fate of millions of people worldwide as well as an estimated half of the
plant and animal species on Earth could be determined by the speed at which governments of all sizes come
together to halt and reverse the current global temperature trend. We, as a city, embrace this plan as an
important step forward, understanding all the hard work that it will take to fulfill this plan over the next two
decades.
The Climate Action Plan acknowledges our city’s contribution to global climate change, the urgency of action,
and the steps we intend to take to lead the transition to a carbon-free economy. Equally important is realizing
that the pollution we emit and can control locally is only part of our overall contribution to climate change, with
food and goods produced outside of the city also playing a very significant, but much harder to measure role.
Finally, while climate change is the most significant risk to global sustainability, there are untold other risk
factors to the environment in addition to climate change that we must be mindful of and continue our work
toward fully addressing.
We, as the St. Louis Park Environment and Sustainability Commission, fully endorse the Climate Action Plan as a
critical first step toward achieving long-term sustainability for our city. We believe that this will become one
element of many in a holistic sustainability vision and action plan for the city. We also feel that it is important to
understand that while the Climate Action Plan represents the best strategies and forecasts that can currently be
projected, it must also be a living document, updated as new trends, technologies, and ways of measuring
evolve in this ever-advancing field. We must also keep in mind that it is up to us not to rest on our laurels, but to
continually stay current on the actions other leading cities around the world are taking to advance sustainability,
mitigate climate change, and improve the human condition.
We applaud the efforts of City Staff and City Council to take on this challenge and believe it is our collective
responsibility to act with urgency on executing the plans and strategies contained within this St. Louis Park
Climate Action Plan.
Sincerely,
The St. Louis Park Environment and Sustainability Commission, 2017
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 6
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 4
Table of Contents
Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................................1
Letter from the Youth .................................................................................................................................................2
Letter from the Environment and Sustainability Commission ...................................................................................3
Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................5
Background .................................................................................................................................................................7
Plan Development ......................................................................................................................................................8
Community-wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Profile ............................................................................................. 10
St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan ........................................................................................................................... 13
KICK-START PROJECTS ......................................................................................................................................... 14
Project 1: Youth-led initiative to increase energy efficiency and renewable energy in the community ............ 14
Project 2: Develop a climate action plan resource hub ...................................................................................... 14
Project 3: Install electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure in public parking lots .......................................... 14
GOALS, STRATEGIES, AND ACTIONS .................................................................................................................... 15
Goal 1: Reduce energy consumption in large commercial and industrial (C/I) buildings by 30% by 2030, as
compared to the business-as-usual forecast....................................................................................................... 15
Goal 2: Reduce energy consumption in small to mid-size commercial buildings by 30% by 2030, as compared
to the business-as-usual forecast. ....................................................................................................................... 17
Goal 3: By 2030, design all new construction to be net-zero energy (NZE). ....................................................... 20
Goal 4: Reduce energy consumption in residential buildings by 35% by 2030, as compared to the business-as-
usual forecast. ..................................................................................................................................................... 22
Goal 5: Achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2030 ......................................................................................... 24
Goal 6: Reduce vehicle emissions by 25% by 2030, as compared to the business-as-usual forecast................. 27
Goal 7: Achieve a 50% reduction in waste by 2030. ........................................................................................... 31
Advanced Strategies .............................................................................................................................................. 333
A.Identify opportunities for thermal energy grids ........................................................................................ 34
B.Explore opportunities for combined heat and power ................................................................................ 34
C.Anaerobic digesters for waste heat and compressed natural gas ............................................................. 34
D.Fuel switching ............................................................................................................................................. 34
E.Carbon offsets ............................................................................................................................................ 35
F.Emerging technologies ............................................................................................................................... 35
G.Scope 3 Emissions ....................................................................................................................................... 35
City Operations ........................................................................................................................................................ 37
Internal Team ...................................................................................................................................................... 43
Appendices: ............................................................................................................................................................. 44
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 7
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 5
Executive Summary
St. Louis Park is a leader in local clean energy initiatives, having passed the most ambitious municipal climate
goals in Minnesota. With its sights set on carbon neutrality by 2040, a bold yet achievable goal, the city must
continue to challenge status quo energy usage and associated greenhouse-gas emissions. The Climate Action
Plan (CAP) that follows begins with three kick-start projects to help spur clean energy changes in the community
and build momentum for the implementation of this plan. This is followed by seven climate goals, supporting
strategies, and specific initiatives and actions to help guide St. Louis Park toward intermediary progress by 2030.
The purpose of setting goals to 2030 rather than 2040 is to get the city on a trajectory toward its carbon neutral
goal and allow an interim point to examine progress and reassess its course of action. The CAP then outlines
more aggressive, advanced strategies that are necessary for the achievement of carbon neutrality by 2040. The
CAP concludes with guidance on how the city itself can strive to improve its climate impact to lead the
community toward its collective goals.
Recognizing the difficulty of transitioning into this plan, three kick-start projects are designed to catalyze
engagement with the community and build momentum for change. The first project is a youth-led initiative,
building on the city’s history of engaging its young residents. The second project aims to centralize information
about the plan and other climate action resources into one, easy-to-find hub for households and businesses to
reference. The third project is to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles by installing chargers in public
parking lots.
The next section states seven climate goals, with each accompanied by a series of strategies and specific
initiatives and actions. The following goals address the greatest areas for climate impact:
1.Reduce energy consumption in large commercial buildings 30% by 2030
2.Reduce energy consumption in small to mid-size commercial buildings 30% by 2030
3.Design and build all new construction to be net-zero energy (NZE) by 2030
4.Reduce energy consumption in residential buildings 35% by 2030
5.Achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2030
6.Reduce vehicle emissions by 25% by 2030
7.Reduce solid waste 50% by 2030 from Business as Usual
Specific reduction targets are assigned to each strategy that were calculated using the wedge diagram tool
(Appendix F). The strategies are supported by initiatives and actions intended to help the city achieve these
targets. The impact of each of the listed initiatives is aggregated to demonstrate the total emissions reductions.
At the end of each section is a list of resources that are available to support the city in implementing these
actions. The seven mid-term goals will jointly accomplish a 55% reduction in emissions by 2030 and a 62%
reduction by 2040. The remaining emissions will come from fossil fuel use in buildings and travel, including
vehicle and air travel. The remaining sources of emissions will require the city to identify additional advanced
strategies (e.g., fuel switching, thermal solutions, and carbon offsets) to achieve carbon neutrality.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 8
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 6
Following the seven mid-term goals are examples of longer-term, deep decarbonization initiatives St. Louis Park
must begin to plan for in the next five to ten years in order to address the remaining 38% of emissions. The city
is encouraged to begin long-range planning for the following Advanced Strategies:
A.Identify opportunities for thermal energy grids
B.Explore opportunities for combined heat and power
C.Anaerobic digesters for waste heat and compressed natural gas
D.Fuel switching
E.Carbon offsets
F.Emerging technologies
G.Scope 3 emissions
The CAP concludes with recommendations for how city operations can be improved to help reach carbon
neutrality by 2040. While these operations only account for a small portion of overall carbon outputs, city
leaders serve as visible examples to demonstrate that achieving these goals is possible.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 9
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 7
Background
St. Louis Park is among Minnesota’s leading communities in addressing its climate change impact. The climate
and energy goals included in this CAP are among the most ambitious in the nation. Climate change is altering the
way communities think about their public and private sector infrastructure, operations, local resources, and
social norms. With this plan, St. Louis Park is leading the way in rethinking how local resources are used and how
to leverage new opportunities for residents and businesses to reduce their impact on climate change.
A long-time leader in its commitment to environmental stewardship, the city was among the first communities
to offer curbside compost pick-up and now has a Zero Waste Packaging Ordinance. In 2009, the city created an
urban reforestation program to enhance the health of the tree canopy. St. Louis Park is a Step 3 GreenStep City
and participated as one of the original pilot cities, helping to launch Minnesota’s most successful city
sustainability program.
In early 2015, the St. Louis Park Environment and Sustainability Commission (ESC) made the case to Council to
participate in the Partners in Energy (PiE) program offered by Xcel Energy in order to drive more action in
reducing energy use and ultimately citywide greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Council approved participating in
PiE and by 2015 a community team was formed to develop an Energy Action Plan. Four priorities emerged as the
hallmark elements of the Energy Action Plan: 1) create a climate plan with the goal of achieving carbon
neutrality by 2040, 2) drive energy efficiency in business, 3) increase renewable energy purchases, and 4) create
a partnership with youth. The first was developed in consideration of what the city could do to help prevent a
global temperature rise of another 1.5° Celsius, as was agreed upon at the Paris Climate Agreement meetings in
2015.
The Energy Action Plan was presented to City Council in April 2016 and a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) for implementing the plan was presented to Council in September 2016. As instructed, the City Manager
signed the MOU in support of providing resources to implement the plan. Key components of the PiE plan
included climate action planning and a partnership with youth going forward. Youth involvement resulted in
high school students from the Roots and Shoot Environmental Club to partner with a nonprofit, iMatter, to
produce and present a report card, a petition, and a climate inheritance resolution to Council. Council adopted
the resolution in May 2016, stating:
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the St. Louis Park City Council commits to working constructively, using
ingenuity, innovation, and courageous determination to create a St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan for
consideration that significantly reduces St. Louis Park’s greenhouse gas emissions to levels that would protect
our community’s children and grandchildren from the risk of climate destruction.
The plan that follows is a direct result of the Climate Inheritance Resolution (Appendix B), offering a roadmap for
the city to work toward its ambitious goals. Actions and technologies included in this plan exist today and are
ready for implementation. Leveraging existing programs and expanding collaboration will be key to successful
implementation.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 10
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 8
Plan Development
The Climate Inheritance Resolution, passed by the City Council in May 2016, included a commitment to creating
a Climate Action Plan (CAP) that significantly reduces greenhouse gas levels to protect the community’s children
and grandchildren from the risk of climate destruction. The development of the CAP was spearheaded by the
city’s Environment and Sustainability Coordinator, Shannon Pinc, and the Climate Action Plan Advisory
Committee. The advisory committee was formed to develop goals and to be the citizen-led decision-making
body. The advisory committee was made up of several residents — many of whom participated in the PiE
process — and one staff member. Members of the Roots and Shoots Program at St. Louis Park High School were
invited to review the plan and develop ideas for how the youth can be a part of implementation.
Greenhouse gas assessments were completed for both city operations and community-wide energy use.
Preparation of the Greenhouse Gas Assessment for City Operations (Appendix E) involved data collection for
building, fleet, contractor, and personnel-related travel, consistent with the Local Government Operations
Protocol for the Quantification and Reporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventories, produced by ICLEI. This
information was used to develop recommendations for city operations to guide the city’s efforts in leading the
community toward carbon neutrality.
As a Regional Indicator Initiative (RII) participant, the city had already completed and established a benchmark
from which it could set targets toward achieving its goals. RII is a program that measures annual performance
metrics (including energy, water, travel, waste, and GHG emissions) to help cities meet their environmental
goals. This data was updated to include the most recent years and provide a better picture for how the city has
used energy the previous ten years.
The city is also a participant in the Local Government Planning for Energy Project (LoGoPEP), a new program
designed to help local governments achieve energy goals. As part of LoGoPEP, a wedge diagram tool was
created for energy and greenhouse gas reduction planning (See Appendix F for methodology). The analysis of
the wedge diagram tool reflects the specific energy use and GHG generation pattern in St. Louis Park, helping to
identify the most impactful strategies.
Utilizing the wedge diagram tool, specific strategies were identified to reduce emissions. This information
informed the decisions of the advisory committee as it developed goals across seven action areas to move the
city toward its 2040 carbon neutral goal. The action areas with the greatest potential for impact are:
1.Large Commercial Efficiency
2.Small Commercial Efficiency
3.Net Zero Construction
4.Residential Efficiency
5.Renewable Electricity
6.Transportation Emissions Reduction
7.Waste Reduction and Diversion
The CAP is organized by Goals, Strategies, Initiatives, and Actions. The goals were set for 2030 as midway point
for the city to assess its progress toward becoming carbon neutral by 2040. The strategies were determined
through the development of the wedge diagram tool and illustrate targets for potential emissions reductions.
Specific initiatives and actions were designed to support implementation of the plan and produce significant
emissions reductions across sectors, both now and into the future.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 11
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 9
Implementation of the strategies under all goals will result in a 55% reduction of GHG emissions from business
as usual by 2030, and 62% by 2040. Because the actions will not achieve carbon neutrality by 2040, it is
necessary to implement more aggressive measures to further reduce emissions from natural gas and vehicles.
The CAP identifies advanced strategies for the city to explore and implement both in the immediate future and
in the long-term.
The final section was developed specifically for city operations, which include city buildings and facilities, fleets,
streetlights, and water and wastewater processes. These functions only make-up 1.5% of total community-wide
GHG emissions, but represent a significant opportunity for the city to lead on emissions reduction efforts. The
Greenhouse Gas Assessment for City Operations provided the energy use and associated emissions data that
were used to make recommendations for these reductions.
Implementation of this CAP will take tremendous effort from city personnel, residents, and the business
community. The Climate Action Plan is designed as a guiding document that balances flexibility in
implementation with specific actions that will result in emissions reductions. Beyond reducing GHG emissions,
there are important co-benefits to be gained through implementation of this plan. Energy-saving and clean
energy measures have important economic benefits, including reduced energy costs and job opportunities. Land
use changes can improve physical and mental health, as well as improve individual behavior to be more
sustainable. Equitable implementation of this plan should support small businesses and low-income residents
through direct engagement and incentives, and should ensure job creation opportunities for underemployed
residents.
The city continues to advance race equity and inclusion through activities, outreach, programs, policies, projects,
initiatives, contracting, budgeting, hiring, and all other areas of work and service delivery. The Climate Action
Plan will impact everyone in the community and it is important that racial equity considerations are made and
used as part of achieving the targets and goals outlined in the document.
Implementation of this ambitious plan will support the city in its efforts to reduce the risks associated with
climate change while creating a more resilient community.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 12
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 10
Community-wide Greenhouse Gas Emissions Profile
St. Louis Park has participated in the Regional Indicators Initiative (RII) since 2009. RII has completed a
greenhouse gas inventory for the city for all years between 2007 and 2016, and has made projections for
“businesses-as-usual” emissions looking out to 2040. Business-as-usual shows the anticipated emissions if the
city were to take no action to reduce its emissions. This information was captured using the wedge diagram tool,
which divides the emissions by sector (building energy, transportation, waste, and wastewater), as seen in
Figure 1. This graph illustrates that if the city were to do nothing to actively reduce emissions, there would be a
slight rise in emissions overtime.
The greatest emissions sources are from buildings and transportation. The building sector includes emissions
from all commercial, industrial, and residential buildings. This includes electricity, which is primarily used for
lighting, appliances, and other electronic devices, but can be used for space and water heating as well. Natural
gas is the main fuel for space and water heating,
cooking, and many industrial processes.
Emissions from buildings make up 58% of all
emissions in St. Louis Park (Figure 2).
Transportation makes up 39% of total emissions
within the community. Emissions from
transportation are attributable to car and truck
travel, and are estimated by vehicle miles
traveled within the city boundaries (regardless
of through traffic or with an origin or destination
in the city). The remaining emissions come from
waste and waste water treatment, which make
up less than 3% of total emissions.
Building emissions can be broken down further
into two sectors: residential and commercial.
58%
39%
2%1%
ALL EMISSIONS BY SECTOR
Total Building
Transportation
Solid Waste
Wastewater
Treatment
Figure 3 Building Emissions by sector; Source: Regional Indicators Initiative
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e BUSINESS-AS-USUAL EMISSIONS BY SECTOR
Waste and Wastewater
Vehicle and Air Travel
Residential Natural Gas
Residential Electricity
C/I Natural Gas
C/I Electricity
Figure 1 Business as usual emissions by sector. Data from the Regional Indicators Initiative.
Figure 2 Percent of emissions by sector. Source: Regional Indicators
Initiative
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 13
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 11
Emissions from the commercial sector are nearly double the emissions of the residential sector. Commercial
buildings offer greater opportunity for deep efficiency improvements as they use significantly more energy per
building as compared to residential. There are nearly 630 commercial buildings in St. Louis Park, 157 of which
that are greater than 20,000 square feet. While larger buildings do not necessarily use more energy, size can be
a good indicator of potential opportunities for energy savings.
There are more than 23,000 households in the city; 11,400 are single family, the remaining are multi-family.
Emissions from multi-family buildings are found in both the commercial and residential sector: CenterPoint
Energy typically includes multi-family in commercial, while Xcel Energy includes it in residential. This is important
to consider when tracking emissions reductions by sector as improvements in multi-family buildings will result in
emissions reductions in both the commercial and residential sector.
Transportation emissions are measured by the Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) within the city’s boundaries. The
VMT includes commercial and freight vehicles, personal cars, and mass transit vehicles. In 2016, more than
436,500,000 miles were driven within St. Louis Park, 65.9% were from light duty passenger vehicles. Of the light
duty vehicles, 89% are fueled by gasoline and flex fuel (e85) is the next most common fuel (Figure 4).
Gasoline
89%
UnknownHybrid
Diesel/Biodiesel
Flex Fuel
Other
11%
ST. LOUIS PARK LIGHT DUTY PASSENGER VEHICLES
BY FUEL TYPE
Figure 3 Source: U.S. Department of Energy, State & Local Energy Data
Figure 4 Light Duty Vehicles Fuel Type, Data Source: Department of Energy State and Local Energy Data
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 14
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 12
Understanding the baseline emissions from each sector allows targets to be set to decrease emissions over time.
Using the wedge diagram tool, emissions reductions can be visualized to see which strategies have the greatest
impact. The planned emissions graph (Figure 5) shows businesses-as-usual emissions to demonstrate the
emissions reductions that result from the actions in this plan. The gray line across the top of the wedges depicts
the business-as-usual (BAU) emissions; the wedges beneath the BAU line represent carbon emissions reduction
by sector over time. The CAP focuses on strategies that can be implemented by 2030 (orange dashed line) to set
the city on a trajectory toward its ultimate goal of being carbon neutral by 2040. The gray and dark gray wedges
at the bottom represent the remaining emissions that will need to be met through implementation of the
advanced strategies. In other words, realizing the targets of every strategy of the seven action areas will not get
the city to carbon neutral. The remaining emissions come from transportation (especially heavy-duty vehicles
and air travel), and natural gas consumption in buildings that have exhausted efficiency measures. The city will
need to evaluate its progress and make adjustments along the way to ensure that it continues to reduce
emissions.
Figure 5 Total emissions reductions resulting from CAP implementation
The Advanced Strategies section of the CAP offers suggestions for various technologies that, while more
complicated to implement and require long-range planning, will have significant impact on reducing the city’s
carbon emissions. Advances in technologies may be available in the future to help further reduce those
emissions. For instance, there are companies that are working on electric heavy-duty trucks; electric buses are
increasingly integrated into public fleets; and building efficiency and renewable technologies continue to show
promise to displace emissions from natural gas.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e
PLANNED EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS BY SECTOR
Commercial/Industrial Efficiency
Residential Efficiency
Electric Grid Mix
Renewable Energy
Travel Strategies
Waste Strategies
Advanced Thermal Strategies & Offsets
Advanced Travel Strategies & Offsets
Business-As-Usual Goal
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 15
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 13
St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan
The City of St. Louis Park has committed to a bold, yet achievable, goal to become carbon neutral by 2040. This
will require aggressive action on the part of the city, its residents, and its businesses. The following lays out a
Climate Action Plan (CAP) that will set the city in motion to achieve its ambitious climate goals. The CAP is
designed to guide the city through various strategies and initiatives to achieve seven broad goals to reduce
energy consumption, increase renewable energy, and transform travel.
The CAP is broken into four sections that will help the city make continuous progress toward achieving carbon
neutrality. The plan begins with three kick-start projects. These projects are designed to help city staff,
residents, and businesses hit the ground running upon the launch of the plan. These tangible projects will allow
the city to claim early success and generate momentum to continue buildings its efforts to implement this plan.
The three projects are:
Project 1: Youth-led initiative to increase energy efficiency and renewable energy in the community
Project 2: Develop a climate action plan resource hub
Project 3: Install electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure in public parking lots
The second section includes seven goals to reduce energy consumption in the commercial and residential
sectors, achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2030, reduce transportation emissions by 25%, and accomplish
the city’s waste reduction goal. These goals and their supporting strategies will help the city reduce emissions
55% by 2030, and 62% by 2040.
Impact Goals
Building Energy
Efficiency
21.7%
Reduce energy consumption in large commercial buildings 30%
Reduce energy consumption in small to mid-size commercial buildings
Design all new construction to be net-zero energy
Reduce energy consumption in residential buildings by 35%
Renewable Electricity
23.3%Achieve 100% renewable electricity
Travel
8.4%Reduce vehicle emissions 25%
Solid Waste
1.1%Reduce solid waste 50%
The third section of the CAP identifies opportunities for Advanced Strategies the city will need to explore in
more depth to meet the final 38% reduction in emissions. Of the remaining emissions, 36% are from natural gas
used in buildings and industrial processes, 44% are from vehicle travel, and 19% are from air travel. These will
need to be met using the acceleration of existing technologies, carbon offsets, and taking advantage of
technological innovations.
The final section of the CAP focuses on city operations emissions reductions. By implementing deep energy
efficiency practices, increasing renewable energy installations, and cleaning its fleet, the city can set an example
for residents and businesses to support and follow.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 16
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 14
KICK-START PROJECTS
Three projects, described herein, have been identified to help launch the city’s CAP. The intention of these
projects is to provide initial focus for the city and its partners to implement specific actions that will provide
momentum for implementing the CAP.
PROJECT 1: Youth-led initiative to increase energy efficiency and renewable energy in the community
St. Louis Park’s youth have been instrumental in working with the city to advance its efforts to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, and it will be critical to maintain the involvement of students to accomplish the goals
of the plan. The Roots and Shoots Club, supported by iMatter, at St. Louis Park High School will initiate a
student-led project to increase the adoption of green power purchases, clean energy, and/or energy efficiency
actions in the city. This may involve working directly with the school district to help it adopt and achieve goals
consistent with the city’s goals; an outreach effort to get fellow students to encourage their families to sign-up
for green power and decrease energy use; or an educational campaign for residents and small businesses to
understand their solar resource and guide them toward installing solar on their rooftops.
While it is important for this project to be initiated and implemented by the youth, the city should support
efforts, identify big-impact opportunities, and maintain an active relationship as the project advances.
PROJECT 2: Develop a climate action plan resource hub
This effort will require city staff, residents, and businesses to move together to achieve deep emissions
reduction by 2040. Through branding, communication, and outreach, the city can make it clear what it needs
from the community and provide resources to help people participate in energy saving and clean energy
initiatives. A CAP Resource Hub (see Seattle) will serve as a one-stop destination for businesses and residents to
find information to improve efficiency, install solar, purchase green power, participate in a bulk purchase of
electric vehicles, and more. The hub should be easily accessible on the city’s website and have clearly identified
resources for residents and businesses to take advantage of multiple opportunities.
City staff will be responsible for developing the CAP Resource Hub. There are several recommendations and
resources throughout this document to include in this project (Appendix D).
PROJECT 3: Install electric vehicle (EV) charging infrastructure in public parking lots
Transforming how people move within the city will be one of the biggest challenges for St. Louis Park. There are
several options the city can consider to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles. While the biggest
impact will come from reducing vehicle miles traveled, there will still be people who need and want to drive. In
recognition of this limitation, the city should encourage residents to choose electric vehicles (EVs) and
accelerate the adoption of zero emission vehicles.
For this project, the city will provide charging infrastructure for EVs in public parking lots. This will include
parking lots associated with city-owned buildings, city parks, and school buildings. The charging stations should
be highly visible, educational, and incorporate any branding the city develops as part of its climate action efforts.
The city already has a charger in the City Hall parking lot and has included an additional electric vehicle charger
in its 2019 Capital Improvement Plan; this should be expanded to include public locations listed above, as well as
educational material.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 17
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 15
GOALS, STRATEGIES, INITIATIVES, AND ACTIONS
The following goals were developed in coordination with the Climate Action Plan Advisory Committee. The goals
look at GHG emissions out to the year 2030 and put the city on a trajectory to reduce emissions 55% by that
time. The year 2030 was selected to serve as mid-point where the city could reassess the CAP to determine how
to accomplish the remaining emissions reductions. While some of the remaining emissions can be reduced
through the continuation of these strategies, it will take more aggressive action to get to zero emissions.
Advanced technologies and practices that will drive down the remaining emissions are included in the next
section.
GOAL 1: Reduce energy consumption in large commercial and industrial (C/I) buildings by 30% by 2030, as
compared to the business-as-usual forecast.
Large commercial buildings are defined here as 20,000 square feet or larger. These buildings currently comprise
25% of the total number of commercial buildings in St. Louis Park (157 out of 626), and are estimated to make
up 64% of commercial energy consumption.
STRATEGIES:
•Building Retrofits: 79 buildings complete retrofits by 2030, saving an average of 18% (1.5% of total
building emissions).
•Appliance Equipment and Fixture Efficiency: 79 buildings replace equipment with high efficiency
models by 2030, saving an average of 25% (3.3% of total building emissions).
•Efficient Building Operations: By 2030, 143 buildings are actively engaged in building operations best
management practices (BMPs), saving an average of 15% (7.7% of total building emissions).
•Behavior Change: By 2030, occupants of 52 buildings are engaged in sustained behavior change
strategies, saving an average of 8% (0.7% of total building emissions).
IMPACT: By reducing energy consumption in large commercial buildings by 30% from the business-as-usual
forecast, these strategies are estimated to result in a 13.2% reduction in total buildings emissions in 2030, which
equates to a 7.8% reduction in community-wide emissions.
GOAL 1 INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS
1.1. Create an internal team to lead large commercial energy efficiency efforts
The city has limited control over the energy decisions made by building operators of large commercial and
industrial (C/I) facilities. It can, however, enable and advance energy efficiency through efforts to encourage,
incentivize, and support more aggressive energy action. This team will be largely responsible for
implementing the following actions.
1.1.1. Appoint specific staff to lead and organize the internal large commercial building energy
efficiency team
1.1.2. Determine who should participate on the large commercial building energy efficiency team
1.1.3. Establish goals and milestones to complete the actions to achieve the large commercial
buildings goals
1.1.4. Hold regular check-in meetings to track milestones and identify next steps
1.1.5. Engage and recruit large commercial business stakeholders to support this effort; identify
companies with energy/climate goals to be leaders
1.1.6. Institutionalize large commercial energy efficiency as a normal function of this team
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 18
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 16
1.2. Adopt a building energy disclosure ordinance for all public buildings and all commercial buildings
greater than 20,000 square feet.
A building energy disclosure ordinance is a policy tool that uses market forces to increase building energy
performance and motivate building owners and operators to invest in energy efficiency improvements.
Adopting such an ordinance will allow the city to see how energy is used among its largest buildings, lead to
accelerated energy reductions, and strengthen relationships between the city and the business community
through more active engagement.
1.2.1. Designate a project lead among city staff; coordinate with Initiative 1.1
1.2.2. Participate in energy disclosure pilot program through Hennepin County
1.2.3. Hold stakeholder meetings with managers of largest buildings to explain the goals of an
ordinance, minimize barriers, and gain input
1.2.4. Host a “data jam” session where building managers can enter energy with technical assistance
providers present
1.2.5. Communicate to businesses that the city needs their help to achieve climate goals
1.2.6. Identify businesses in the community that have climate goals and highlight as leaders
1.2.7. Determine who will manage the program at the city, what the budget will be, how much staff
time will be needed, and what resources are available
1.2.8. Work with stakeholders to draft a building energy disclosure ordinance
1.2.9. Present draft ordinance language to City Council
1.2.10. Adopt the building energy disclosure ordinance
1.2.11. Manage the program: track progress, share resources, and promote successes
1.2.12. Provide on-going individualized technical assistance for benchmarking to help drive participation
1.3. Support energy efficiency and clean energy projects
Utilize, promote, and encourage existing tools, programs, and incentives to support C/I energy projects.
1.3.1. Encourage Energy Star certification for eligible facilities
o Establish an annual goal of new certifications
o Designate a section of the CAP Resource Hub to large C/I and include a link to Energy Star
Portfolio Manager, which is a free resource available for all buildings
o Track and promote certifications each year
o Explore city’s legal authority to require disclosure of EPA Energy Star rating at the time of
sale or lease in commercial buildings
1.3.2. Continue to encourage participation in other certification programs like U.S. Green Building
Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) for existing buildings
1.3.3. Continue to provide information about financing options such as commercial PACE (Property
Assessed Clean Energy), Trillion BTU, and Rev It Up loan program in CAP Resource Hub
1.3.4. Provide opportunities for existing building operators to participate in training, including training
for new and emerging building technologies such as net zero energy
1.4. Communicate and market project progress, results, and success
Continue to market the success of the CAP, make it a part of regular city communications.
1.4.1. Implement Partners in Energy (PiE) strategies for top 100 largest businesses
o Provide a call to action for large business leaders from the mayor/city council
o Setup a public website to track business participation and results
o Provide ongoing mayoral/city council recognition of energy leaders
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 19
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 17
o Publicize individual accomplishments using case studies
1.4.2. Create business-facing energy use cases/company spotlights
1.4.3. Develop business-specific outreach materials on opportunities, incentives, and tangible and
intangible benefits
1.4.4. Launch a public-private energy efficiency campaign to catalyze action in large businesses
1.4.5. Identify large commercial entities with climate goals to act as community leaders, coordinate
with Action 1.1.5
1.4.6. Expand use of behavioral strategies (e.g. turning off electronics, programming thermostats, etc.)
to drive energy reductions
RESOURCES
•Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) – The Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program allows
home and business owners to finance efficiency projects through a voluntary assessment on their
property.
•Saint Paul Port Authority (Trillion BTU) – The Trillion BTU program, administered by Saint Paul Port
Authority, provides rebates and loans to businesses to complete energy improvements
•MN Department of Commerce (Rev It Up) – Commerce annually solicits a request for proposals (RFP)
from units of local government seeking low-cost, long-term capital to finance community energy
efficiency and renewable energy system projects that are financed via energy savings and/or projected
revenues created by the systems.
•Xcel Energy – Offers a variety of rebates and efficiency programs to customers.
•CenterPoint – Offers a variety of rebates and efficiency programs to customers.
•Institute for Market Transformation – Provides more rationale behind this type of policy, along with case
study examples and a tool to compare policies across the country.
•American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy – The State and Local Policy database includes many
cities’ building energy disclosure policies and their requirements.
•Minneapolis – The City of Minneapolis has passed a Building Rating & Disclosure Policy. This document
lays out the rationale of the policy, how it is designed, its benefits, and how it will be enforced.
GOAL 2: Reduce energy consumption in small to mid-size commercial buildings by 30% by 2030, as
compared to the business-as-usual forecast.
Small and mid-sized commercial buildings are defined here as less than 20,000 square feet. These buildings
currently comprise 75% of the total number of commercial buildings in St. Louis Park (460 of 626), but are
estimated to consume only 36% of the commercial energy; an effective engagement strategy will be necessary
to reduce the burden on time and staff resources and achieve high participation.
Strategies:
•Building Retrofits: 117 small and mid-sized buildings complete retrofits by 2030, resulting in an average
energy savings of 18% (0.7% of total building emissions).
•Appliance Equipment and Fixture Efficiency: 188 buildings replace equipment with high efficiency
models, resulting in an average energy savings of 17% (2.6% of total building emissions).
•Efficient Building Operations: By 2030, 235 buildings are actively engaged in building operations BMPs,
saving an average of 23% (3.0% of total building emissions).
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 20
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 18
•Behavior Change: By 2030, occupants of 155 buildings are engaged in sustained behavior change
strategies, saving an average of 5% (0.4% of total building emissions).
IMPACT: By reducing energy consumption in small to mid-size commercial buildings by 30% from the
business-as-usual forecast, these strategies are estimated to result in a 6.7% reduction in total building
emissions in 2030, which equates to a 4.0% reduction in community-wide emissions.
GOAL 2 INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS
2.1. Develop an outreach strategy to engage small and mid-size businesses
There are more than 600 commercial properties in St. Louis Park. Most of these businesses will need to
engage in energy improvements by 2030, and all will need to by 2040.
2.1.1. Determine who will lead outreach efforts to engage small and mid-size business (e.g.
Environment & Sustainability Commission (ESC) workgroup)
2.1.2. Designate a staff person to serve as city liaison to the outreach efforts
2.1.3. Establish goals for the number of properties reached each year
o The city would need to reach an average of 38 businesses each year between now and 2030,
or
o Target market segments (grocery stores, restaurants), or specific geographies (small business
districts)
2.1.4. Engage local business associations (e.g., TwinWest Chamber of Commerce/St. Louis Park
Business Council) to develop strategies for small to mid-sized business energy efficiency
programs
2.1.5. Integrate energy efficiency technical assistance into existing economic development programs
and partnerships with local business associations
2.1.6. Utilize the ‘small business coach’ model (see Resources) to educate business owners on energy
savings opportunities and benefits
2.2. Support energy efficiency and clean energy projects
Utilize, promote, and encourage existing tools, programs, and incentives to support small to mid-sized C/I
energy projects.
2.2.1. Encourage Energy Star certification for eligible facilities, in coordination with Initiative 1.3
o Establish an annual goal of new buildings achieving certification
o Include a link to Energy Star Portfolio Manager on city’s Small Business Resources page, and
include information on the CAP Resource Hub
o Track and promote certifications each year
o Explore requiring disclosure of EPA Energy Star rating at the time of sale or lease in
commercial buildings
o Help businesses promote themselves as environmentally friendly companies
2.2.2. Promote behavioral energy efficiency strategies
o Expand use of behavioral strategies to drive energy reductions (Clean Energy Resource
Teams (CERTs) and Center for Energy and Environment (CEE) have multiple resources for
behavior change strategies)
2.2.3. Set up a public website to track business participation and results – this should be a part of the
CAP Resource Hub
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 21
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 19
2.2.4. Include educational and promotional material in building permit processes to increase greater
awareness and adoption of energy efficiency, clean energy, and water conservation
improvements
2.2.5. Continue to promote financing and rebate opportunities, such as PACE and utility efficiency
rebate programs; add to CAP Resource Hub
2.2.6. Encourage or require improvements to a building’s energy or water performance during major
renovation, sale, or certain types of improvements
o Incentivize private investment into energy efficiency with a cost-share program (see
Minneapolis example under Resources)
2.2.7. Incorporate city climate goals into the 2036 contract renewal for utility franchise agreements
2.3. Ensure small business efficiency programs are implemented equitably
Some small businesses may need additional financial and technical assistance to take advantage of available
programs. Ensure that these businesses have equitable and affordable access to energy efficiency programs.
2.3.1. Be intentional about engaging small businesses in low-income communities
2.3.2. Target minority-owned small businesses and share benefits and energy efficiency and resources
2.4. Communication and Marketing
The city should continue to promote its goals, projects, and successes among small and mid-sized businesses
in the community.
2.4.1. Provide ongoing mayoral/city council recognition of energy leaders
2.4.2. Partner with private, public, or non-profit organizations (Local companies, CERTs, GreenStep
Cities, TwinWest) to publicize individual accomplishments using case studies
2.4.3. Create an intra-city energy competition among small businesses
RESOURCES
•Lake Street Small Business Energy Coaching Pilot Program – Lake Street Council did extensive outreach
to small businesses on energy efficiency and documented their strategies and lessons learned.
•Minnesota Center for Energy and Environment – offers a range of programs targeted at commercial
energy efficiency, including lighting HVAC, financing, and more.
•Minnesota Clean Energy Resource Teams – provides resources, tools, and engagement efforts to
implement local energy projects.
•Minneapolis green business cost-share program – This is an example of an incentive program
implemented by the City of Minneapolis.
•Energy Star for Small Business – Energy Star provides resources and recognition for small and medium
sized businesses.
•Xcel Energy Rebates – Offers rebates for efficiency improvements
•CenterPoint Small Commercial Efficiency Program – Offers rebates for high-efficiency equipment.
•ACEEE – Successful Practices of Small Commercial Energy Efficiency Programs
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 22
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 20
GOAL 3: By 2030, design all new construction to be net-zero energy (NZE).
Strategies:
•Energy Code Enforcement: Continue to ensure all new and renovated buildings meet the current energy
code, reducing energy use by 35% from the baseline building for new construction and 17% for
renovations (1.2% of total building emissions).
•Stretch Energy Code: By 2030, all new and renovated buildings are constructed to green building
standards (NZE), reducing emissions by 67-100% from the baseline buildings for new construction and
34-50% for renovations, depending on the year designed (3.3% of total building emissions).
IMPACT: These strategies are estimated to result in a 4.5% reduction in total building emissions in 2030 over the
business-as-usual forecast, which equates to a 2.7% reduction in community-wide emissions.
GOAL 3 INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS
3.1. Strengthen the city’s green building policy
The city has a green building policy that requires development projects that receive city financial assistance
to use green building or LEED standards in the design of the buildings. Expanding this policy to the extent
possible will have long-term impacts on future development.
3.1.1. Include a voluntary element of this policy to reach development projects that are below the
required size or do not receive city funds
3.1.2. Incentivize and promote development projects that voluntarily comply with this code
3.1.3. Expand community outreach efforts to ensure developers and new residents are aware of the
policy and the city’s climate goals
3.1.4. Consider how the voluntary element (3.1.1) of the Green Building policy may be integrated into
the city’s zoning code
3.2. Support the State’s adoption of a green building stretch code
The city cannot currently exceed the State’s energy code. However, if the State were to add a green building
code as an appendix (stretch) code, local authorities would be able to adopt it to increase their standards.
3.2.1. Collaborate with other communities, industry, and state agencies to support the State through
legislation or rule-making in adopting a green building stretch code
3.3. Adopt the green building stretch code as soon as it becomes available
It is unclear if or when the State will adopt a green building code. The city should prepare for how the code
will be integrated into its practices.
3.3.1. Track the progress of any potential legislation that includes a stretch code
3.3.2. Train local government staff and building officials about the appendix building code so they are
ready to enforce it once the city is able to adopt it
3.3.3. Update website and educational materials to include the new green building code
3.4. Encourage existing energy code to ensure development meets the highest standards
Some buildings in the State do not perform to the designed standards. Education and stricter enforcement
of the energy code can help improve the energy performance of new development.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 23
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 21
3.4.1. Continue to educate building designers and contractors of the Minnesota Code requirement and
ensure 100% compliance with the existing energy code for all new and renovated building
3.4.2. Provide educational materials to homeowners and businesses who are completing their own
construction projects to ensure they are aware of energy standards
RESOURCES
•Maplewood – The City of Maplewood has adopted a strong Green Building Program.
•SB 2030 – Sustainable building energy standards that achieve net zero development by 2030.
•St. Louis Park Green Building Policy - Requires building construction projects that receive or use city
financial assistance to incorporate sustainable development practices.
Figure 6 Total building emission reductions from all commercial/industrial energy efficiency strategies.
The strategies included in Goals 1-3 will have a significant impact on emissions reduction in the Commercial and
Industrial sector, illustrated by the wedges in Figure 6. In 2030, the total impact of Goal 1-3 strategies is a 41.0%
reduction in commercial/industrial emissions. This results in a 24.4% reduction in building energy emissions and
a 14.5% reduction in community-wide emissions.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e
COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL EFFICIENCY STRATEGIES
Energy Code Enforcement
Stretch Energy Code
Building Retrofit
Appliance, Equipment, and Fixture Efficiency
Efficient Building Operations
Behavior Change
Business-As-Usual Strategic Plan Goal
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 24
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 22
GOAL 4: Reduce energy consumption in residential buildings by 35% by 2030, as compared to the
business-as-usual forecast.
Strategies:
•Energy Code Enforcement: Continue to ensure all new and renovated residential buildings meet the
current energy code, reducing energy use by 39% from the baseline building for new construction and
19% for renovations (0.8% of total building emissions).
•Stretch Energy Code: By 2030, all new residential buildings are built to net zero energy (NZE) standards
reducing emissions by 67-100% from the baseline building, depending on the year designed (0.5% of
total building emissions).
•Building Retrofits/Weatherization: 9,000 single- family households complete retrofits/weatherization
by 2030, saving an average of 37% for natural gas and 6% for electricity (4.9% of total building
emissions).
•Appliance, Equipment, and Fixture Efficiency: 17,820 (75%) households replace electrical equipment
with high efficiency models, and 7,200 households replace natural gas equipment with high efficiency
models by 2030, saving an average of 13% (2.9% of total building emissions).
•Behavior Change: By 2030, 90% of households will be engaged in sustained behavior change strategies,
saving an average of 10% (3.0% of total building emissions).
IMPACT: By reducing energy consumption in residential buildings by 35% from the business-as-usual forecast,
these strategies are estimated to result in a 12.1% reduction in total building emissions in 2030, which equates
to a 7.2% reduction in community-wide emissions.
GOAL 4 INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS
4.1. Establish a residential outreach team through Sustainable St. Louis Park
The city has more than 23,000 households; just over 50% are single-family homes. Actions must be tailored
to different household types.
4.1.1. Through the Environment and Sustainability Commission and the Roots and Shoots Club, create
a residential outreach team
o Establish annual targets of households to reach (use average kWh use per premise by
neighborhood maps created for the PiE Energy Action Plan to target high users)
o Collect communication materials to share with residents
o Develop a plan to drive residents to action
o Identify other community groups that can build capacity for effective outreach
o Track annual progress
o Combine efforts with increased renewable energy purchases and installations
4.1.2. Utilize existing outreach programs such as Home Energy Squad visits
4.1.3. Identify opportunities to promote energy efficiency action at existing and future city events
4.2. Use city policy tools to encourage energy efficiency
The city has policy and regulatory tools that it could use to encourage energy efficiency action at the time of
sale, or when a lease changes hands.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 25
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 23
4.2.1. Include educational and promotional material in building permit processes to increase greater
awareness and adoption of energy efficiency, clean energy, and water conservation
improvements
4.2.2. Encourage home energy performance report at the time of sale or a new lease agreement in
order to promote better understanding of home comfort, indoor air quality, and utility costs
4.2.3. Include information about energy efficient mortgages on CAP Resource Hub
4.3. Provide energy efficiency programs and resources to residents
Numerous programs exist to help residents finance and complete energy efficiency projects.
4.3.1. Work with Xcel Energy to pilot and deploy smart meters in homes. Smart meters two-way
communication between the meter and the utility, supporting better energy management
4.3.2. Connect residents to Home Energy Squad to receive energy audits, ensure equitable outreach to
all residents
4.3.3. Regularly host utility bill clinics offered by Minnesota Citizens Utility Board to help residents
understand their bills, discuss energy savings options, and hear about rebate availability and
clean energy options
4.3.4. Provide low-income residents information on weatherization programs that may be available to
them through the Minnesota Weatherization Assistance Program or Hennepin County
Community Action Partnership
4.3.5. Adopt residential PACE if it becomes available in Minnesota
4.3.6. Promote the usage of smart home devices that help save energy (e.g. smart thermostats)
4.3.7. Promote and help market on-bill financing by the utility companies as it becomes available
4.3.8. Connect residents to lending options through CEE and Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
4.4. Communication and marketing
Maintain regular communication with residents through direct outreach and normal communications,
4.4.1. Ensure energy efficiency rebate opportunities are listed on the CAP Resource Hub
4.4.2. Create a welcome packet for new businesses and residents, which will provide information on
all the resources and opportunities listed above
4.4.3. Share success of efforts to encourage more residents to act
RESOURCES
• Center for Energy and Environment – CEE provides a range of services including home energy audits,
home energy squad visits, financing, and assistance implementing energy saving measures.
• Energy Fit Homes – CEE has developed an Energy Fitness Score for residential buildings that allows home
owners to see the relative efficiency of their homes.
• Xcel Energy – Offers energy audits and a variety of rebates to customers.
• CenterPoint Energy – Offers energy audits and a variety of rebates to customers.
• Minnesota Weatherization Assistance Program – Provides free home energy upgrades to low-income
homeowners and renters to help save energy and protect against harsh weather.
• Hennepin County CAP – The Community Action Partnership provides free energy related repairs and
heating bill assistance to low income residents.
• Minnesota CUB – Minnesota Citizens Utility Board is a consumer advocacy organization that offers
assistance to utility customers.
• Fix-up Program – Financing program offered by Minnesota Housing Finance Agency.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 26
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 24
Figure 7 Total building emission reductions from residential energy efficiency strategies.
Figure 7 depicts 12.11% emissions reductions from residential energy efficiency strategies. Although there are
more residential buildings in the community, these strategies result in relatively smaller emissions reductions
than the more energy-intensive commercial and industrial sector. This means that the city will have to consider
how to best balance its efforts against the impact and avoid burdening resources for a smaller result. The city
should focus its outreach efforts both on high energy users (as identified in the PiE Energy Action Plan) and low-
income households. High energy users will have greater opportunities for efficiencies, and low-income
households may be burdened by unnecessarily high energy bills.
GOAL 5: Achieve 100% renewable electricity by 2030
Strategies
• Commercial/Industrial Green power purchase Commercial:
o 40% of businesses (~920) purchase all their electricity from green power by 2020
o All businesses purchase all their electricity from green power by 2030 (36.3% of total building
emissions in 2030)
• Residential Green power purchase Commercial:
o 40% of households (~9,840) purchase 100% of their electricity from green power by 2020
o All households purchase 100% of their electricity from green power by 2030 (14.1% of total
building emissions in 2030)
• On-site solar photovoltaic (PV): Meet 10% of building electricity consumption with rooftop solar by
2030 (5.6% of total building emissions in 2030)
IMPACT: By achieving 100% renewable electricity by 2030, these strategies are estimated to result in a 56.0%
reduction in total building emissions in 2030, which equates to a 33.3% reduction in community-wide emissions.
These savings do not account for changes in electricity electric vehicles or fuel switching from natural gas to
electricity.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e
RESIDENTIAL EFFICIENCY STRATEGIES
Energy Code Enforcement
Stretch Energy Code
Retrofit/Weatherization
Appliance, Equipment, and Fixture Efficiency
Behavior Change
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 27
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 25
GOAL 5 INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS
5.1. Encourage the purchase of renewable energy credits by all businesses and residents
Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) can be purchased through utility programs like WindSource® and
Renewable*Connect. By purchasing credits, utility customers can support additional renewable energy in
the generation mix from wind and solar.
5.1.1. Implement renewable energy strategies from the PiE Energy Action Plan
o Create a near-term web presence on the SLP website for nonprofits, local government,
faith-based organizations, and businesses to learn more and have access to relevant
resources such as financing (integrate with CAP Resource Hub)
o Conduct direct outreach to businesses and residents
o Create materials for neighborhood associations to distribute
5.1.2. Increase participation in green power purchase programs like WindSource® and
Renewable*Connect that are offered by Xcel Energy
o Include links to these programs on the CAP Resource Hub
o Encourage sign-ups through regular communication channels (newsletters, social media,
etc.)
o Charge ESC with developing an outreach strategy that includes annual goals and
engagement tactics
o Engage youth in outreach efforts
o Track annual participation using the community energy report from Xcel
5.2. Encourage participation in community solar
Many residents and business owners are unable to install solar on their rooftop because they don’t have a
good solar resource, are renters, or cannot afford to. Community solar allows utility customers to subscribe
to a solar garden that is sited in another location.
5.2.1. Provide resources to help residents and businesses make informed decisions about community
solar
o Include information and resources on the CAP Resource Hub
5.2.2. Host a community solar garden site that allows residents and businesses to participate
5.2.3. Stipulate in the contract that the project will maintain the RECs
5.2.4. Reserve a portion of the project for low-income residents at a discounted rate
5.2.5. Engage community members throughout the project
5.2.6. Request technical assistance from objective entities like CERTs
5.3. Support and accelerate installation of on-site solar
More than half of the city’s energy consumption can be met by rooftop solar generation within the
community. Investment in on-site solar keeps energy dollars local, and helps the community meet its
climate goals.
5.3.1. Encourage and educate residents on the benefits of on-site solar
o Post the state solar resource map on city’s CAP Resource Hub
o Provide a link the Clean Energy Project Builder
o Provide a link to Energy Sage, an online marketplace that helps reduce the cost of solar
energy installations for business and residential consumers
o Include a link to the National Renewable Energy Lab’s solar calculator, PVWatts®
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 28
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 26
5.3.2. Organize a bulk purchase of solar installations through programs like Solarize and the Solar
Power Hour
o Promote and host workshops to offer residents the opportunity to receive discounted prices
on solar installations
o Coordinate with Roots and Shoots Club to expand outreach efforts to residents, businesses,
and the school district
5.3.3. Over time, continue to encourage more residents and businesses to shift from purchasing green
power to on-site generation to capture co-benefits like property investment, job creation, or
resilient grid infrastructure
5.3.4. Encourage businesses and residents to participate in Solar*Rewards, a production incentive
from Xcel Energy; RECs can be reclaimed by the owner of the solar energy system after 10 years
5.3.5. Achieve SolSmart certification by implementing prescribed best practices
5.3.6. Encourage solar plus storage (and EV) ready homes
5.3.7. Include solar plus storage-installed in homes as an eligible amenity in PUD ordinance
5.4. Install solar on all public facilities with an adequate solar resource
The city can lead by example with public installations of solar energy systems.
5.4.1. Complete a solar resource assessment to determine optimal public sites for solar installation
o Use available mapping tools to identify potential sites for solar installations
o Use public facility solar installations as demonstration projects
o Share production data and cost savings with the community
5.4.2. Determine whether any sites are suitable for community solar gardens
RESOURCES
• Minnesota Solar Suitability App – allows users to enter their address and see an estimate of their solar
resource and production.
• Google Project Sunroof – similarly allows users to see an estimate of solar resource and production.
• CERTs - The Clean Energy Resource Teams have a wide variety of resource on solar energy, particularly
community solar gardens.
• Clean Energy Project Builder - This site aims to bring together all the information you need to plan a
clean energy project, including a search function for installers and funding sources.
• SolSmart Certification - SolSmart provides recognition and no-cost technical assistance to help local
governments reduce barriers to solar energy growth.
• Solarize - The Solarize approach allows groups of homeowners or businesses to work together to
collectively negotiate rates, competitively select an installer, and increase demand through a creative
limited-time offer to join the campaign.
• Solar Power Hour – One hour seminars on how solar PV systems work, financial benefits, and an
explanation of the installation process.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 29
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 27
Figure 8 Total building electric emissions reductions from renewable energy.
Achieving 100% renewable electricity by 2030 will have the greatest impact on carbon emissions in St. Louis
Park, reducing total emissions by nearly 33%. The emissions reduction calculation assumes the building
efficiency goals are met through 2030. The total rooftop generation potential was calculated using a GIS
mapping tool. The rooftop resource is estimated to be equal to approximately 44% of the total electricity used
St. Louis Park. The rooftop estimate does not consider various impediments to solar energy systems, like air
handling units, vents, green roofs, or patios, and therefore may overestimate the available resource. However, it
serves as an indicator of how much solar electricity could be generated within the city boundary. This number is
significantly greater when ground mount applications are considered, particularly where there is underutilized
land, such as large surface parking lots or brownfields.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e
RENEWABLE ENERGY STRATEGIES
Green Power Purchase - Commercial/Industrial
Green Power Purchase - Residential
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 30
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 28
GOAL 6: Reduce vehicle emissions by 25% by 2030, as compared to the business-as-usual forecast.
Strategies
• Reduce Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT): By 2030, VMT per person in St. Louis Park will be reduced by 12%
from 2014 (11.6% of total vehicle emissions).
• Vehicle Efficiency: By 2030, 24% of the existing car stock and 40% of the existing light truck stock will be
replaced with models that comply with CAFE Standards (federal fuel economy regulations), resulting in
39% savings for cars and 43% savings for light trucks (7.2% of total vehicle emissions).
• Increase Adoption of Electric Vehicles (7.5% of total vehicle emissions).
o For city residents: By 2030, 100% of new car and 10% of new truck purchases by St. Louis Park
residents are electric vehicles, such that EVs comprise 28% of total car ownership and 1% of all
truck ownership in SLP. Assuming these vehicles are charged within St. Louis Park with carbon-
neutral electricity, they will achieve savings of 100%.
o For non-city residents: By 2030, 57% of new car and 5% of new truck purchases by non-SLP
residents are electric vehicles. EVs will make-up 14% of total non-resident cars and 1% of the
non-resident trucks that drive in SLP. Assuming these vehicles are charged within Xcel service
territory, they are estimated to achieve savings of 71%.
• Fuel Switching for Heavy Duty Vehicles: By 2030, 10% of heavy duty vehicles will use alternatives to
conventional fuels (i.e. electric, hybrid, and/or soybean-based BD20), achieving an average emissions
reduction of 39% (0.7% of total vehicle emissions).
IMPACT: These strategies are estimated to result in a 27.0% emissions reduction in vehicle travel emissions by
2030, which equates to an 8.4% reduction in community-wide emissions.
GOAL 6 INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS
6.1. Expand infrastructure for electric vehicle charging
Electric vehicles have a lower carbon emissions rate in Xcel Energy territory than combustion engine vehicles. As
the grid gets cleaner, the emissions rate will decline.
6.1.1. Expand public infrastructure for electric vehicle charging
o Implement Kick-start Project 3 of this Plan within one year of Plan adoption
o Identify priority locations for EV charging stations
o Engage Drive Electric Minnesota to help determine charger type (Level 1, 2, or Fast Charger)
and appropriate rate structure for charging
o Ensure EV parking spaces have high visibility and educational signage
6.1.2. Expand private EV charging infrastructure
o Encourage private businesses to offer charging stations for EVs
o Increase access to workplace charging stations (PlugIn Connect, businesses, utilities)
o Include EV parking spaces in parking standards for new development
6.2. Promote and encourage accelerated adoption of EVs
The normal adoption rate for new vehicles types will not be fast enough to have the impact necessary to achieve
the city’s goals.
6.2.1. Promote benefits of and opportunities for EVs on CAP Resource Hub
o Educate on green power options, time-of-day pricing
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 31
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 29
o Promote state, local, and other incentives for purchasers of new EVs (tax credits, preferential
parking, reduced fees)
6.2.2. Work with Drive Electric Minnesota to coordinate a bulk discount program or public awareness
campaign
6.2.3. Work with businesses to increase the number of EVs that are a part of commercial fleets
6.2.4. Host Ride and Drive electric vehicle events
6.2.5. Support electrification of Metro Transit buses
6.3. Encourage alternative low-carbon fuels and fuel-efficient vehicles
Alternative fuels include E85 (ethanol blend), biodiesel, and hydrogen fuel cells. Both vehicles that accept these
fuels, and efficient vehicles emit less carbon than gasoline vehicles.
6.3.1. Provide educational materials on the benefits of fuel efficient vehicles
6.3.2. Promote alternative low-carbon fueling stations (e85, biodiesel)
6.3.3. Encourage alternative fuel for commercial fleets (e.g., delivery vehicles)
6.3.4. Look into anaerobic digestion to produce bio-based natural gas for heavy-duty vehicles
6.4. Enable reduction of vehicle miles traveled (VMT) from single-occupancy vehicles
The biggest impact on transportation emission reductions is from reducing VMT, which requires an increase in
the use of alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles.
6.4.1. Continue to modify land use to encourage alternative modes of transportation, consistent with
the city’s complete streets policy and any future living streets policy
o Accelerate investment in alternative transportation infrastructure
o Continue to implement Connect the Park to increase commuter bicycling and pedestrian
opportunities
o Install roundabouts to reduce vehicle fuel consumption
o Implement transit-oriented development (TOD) near anticipated LRT stops
o Allow building owners to unbundle parking to be rented separately from the building space
6.4.2. Encourage reduced vehicle ownership (there are currently 1.4 vehicles per household) through
education and incentives
6.4.3. Support and enable car sharing services such as HOURCAR®, Zipcar®, car2go, or any future
reputable service
6.4.4. Review current parking ordinance that contains minimum parking requirements, and modify to
use national best practices that set appropriate parking standards to encourage multi-modal
alternatives
6.4.5. Consider instituting flexible parking requirements for future transit-oriented development that
provides services, infrastructure and/or mitigations to reduce parking demand, such as:
o Access to electric, autonomous car-sharing and bicycle sharing programs to increase mobility
options for all residents
o Dedicated parking for low carbon fuel vehicles
o Resident and/or employee transit incentives
o Higher-than-required bicycle parking
6.4.6. Develop a wayfinding signage program to promote use of pedestrian trails and stairs, especially
to improve pedestrian access to schools (e.g. Safe Routes to School) and transit
6.4.7. Consider GHG emissions in planning, resource allocation, and right-of-way management
decisions
6.4.8. Improve the city’s average Walk Score from 47 to 60 by 2030
o Implement the city’s complete streets policy for all transportation projects
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 32
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 30
6.4.9. Participate as a community in the National Bike Challenge, a nationwide event uniting bicyclists
and encouraging new riders
o Promote the National Bike Challenge on the CAP Resource Hub
o Share progress and success of the challenge
o Award top riders twice a year (winter and summer)
RESOURCES:
• Drive Electric Minnesota: Partnership to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles in Minnesota.
• Metropolitan Area Planning Council, example of flexible parking standards and national examples.
Figure 9 Total vehicle travel emission reductions through efficiency and decarbonization strategies.
Figure 9 shows the reduction in emissions from the transportation strategies. Strategies that reduce VMT will
have the greatest impact, followed by switching to EVs. Many of the EV strategies will rely, to some extent, on
market forces and the grid mix. The city will need to consider alternatives to offsetting remaining travel
emissions. Overall, these strategies will result in a 27% reduction in vehicle emissions and 8.4% reduction in
overall emissions.
-
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
300,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e
VEHICLE TRAVEL STRATEGIES
Reduce VMT
Vehicle Efficiency (CAFE standards)
Electric Vehicles
Fuel Switching for Heavy Duty Vehicles
Business-As-Usual Strategic Plan Goal
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 33
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 31
GOAL 7: Achieve a 50% reduction in waste by 2030, as compared to the business-as-usual forecast
IMPACT: Reducing emissions from municipal solid waste 50% by 2030 is estimated to result in a 1.1%
reduction in community-wide emissions.
Emissions from solid waste accounts for 1.7% of total community emissions and are generated from landfills and
incinerators (Note: this does not include lifecycle emissions). While this is relatively small, it is nevertheless
important to address to achieve 2040 goals. The city has a history of working to reduce waste through its long-
standing curbside organics and recycling programs and the more recent Zero Waste Packaging Ordinance. The
Zero Waste Packaging Ordinance went into effect on January 1st, 2017 and requires that all licensed food
establishments use packaging that is reusable, recyclable, or compostable when serving food and beverages that
are intended for immediate consumption.
GOAL 7 INITIATIVES AND ACTIONS
7.1. Adopt a waste reduction plan to achieve a 50% reduction in garbage by 2050 from BAU
7.1.1. Conduct a review of existing waste sort data to determine where more outreach and
information is needed to reduce waste
7.1.2. Work to increase participation in curbside organics recycling to achieve 50% participation by
2030
7.1.3. Implement expanded recycling requirements at multi-family and commercial buildings
7.1.4. Close the loop on organics recycling; require that compost be used as a soil amendment for
public and private construction projects that disturb the soil cover by a set amount
7.2. Continue to improve and enforce the city’s Zero Waste Packaging ordinance
7.2.1. Continue to work with businesses to ensure compliant packaging, as well as proper collection
for recyclable and compostable items
7.2.2. Research lifecycle impacts of acceptable packaging materials; encourage the use of lower
carbon intense products
7.2.3. Continue to require that city-hosted events comply with the Zero Wastes Packaging Ordinance
and relevant environmental purchasing policies; expand to require that outside users of certain
city facilities also use compostable, reusable, or recyclable food service items
7.3. Communication and Marketing
7.3.1. Include resources on city’s website and through social media to inform residents of recycling
and organics programs
7.3.2. Include resources on city’s website and through social media to inform residents about waste
reduction opportunities, such as how to opt-out of phone book and junk mail deliveries
7.3.3. Expand outreach and education on recycling and organics programs and waste reduction
opportunities (e.g. community chat forums for recycling, reusable shipping materials, waste
reduction, and reuse mobile apps)
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 34
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 32
Plan Impact
The Goals, Strategies, and Initiatives outlined above are estimated to achieve a 55% reduction in total GHG
emissions from business as usual in 2030. Most of these savings are achieved through strategies associated with
the energy used in buildings. Figure 10 represents the carbon reductions across each sector. The wedges
denoted by shades of red indicate buildings emissions reductions. The blue shading indicates reductions from an
increase in renewable electricity, the green and purple wedges represent travel and waste emissions reductions,
respectively. Building energy efficiency reduces energy consumption, resulting in a 21.7% reduction in
community-wide emissions. Increasing the use of renewable electricity results in an additional 23.0% emissions
reduction. Vehicle travel efficiency and decarbonization strategies provide 8.4% emissions reduction, and the
elimination of emissions from solid waste contributes the final 1.1% savings. By 2040, many of the implemented
actions will continue to reduce emissions such that the city will achieve an estimated 62% reduction in emissions
by 2040, as compared to business as usual. The light gray space between the dotted and dashed lines represents
the 38% of emissions that remain if city is successful in achieving the 2030 goal. Achieving carbon neutrality by
2040 will require the city to explore and implement the advanced strategies that are described in the next
section.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e
PLANNED EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS BY SECTOR
Commercial/Industrial Efficiency
Residential Efficiency
Electric Grid Mix
Renewable Energy
Travel Strategies
Waste Strategies
Business-As-Usual Strategic Plan Goal
Figure 10 Planned emissions reductions by sector through 2030.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 35
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 33
Advanced Strategies
The Goals, Strategies, Initiatives, and Actions outlined above will continue to reduce GHG emissions from 2030
to 2040 – achieving an estimated 62% reduction from business-as-usual by 2040, leaving 38% that will need to
be addressed with deeper, more long-term strategies. Of the remaining emissions, 36% are from natural gas
used in buildings and industrial processes, 45% are from vehicle travel, and 19% are from air travel (Figure 10).
These sources and activities will not get the city to carbon neutrality without deep decarbonization efforts and
carbon offsets. Buildings depend on natural gas primarily for space and water heating, and industrial processes.
Efficiency alone cannot reduce natural gas consumption enough to achieve carbon neutrality and biogas is not
currently commercially available to replace this energy resource. Technologies that capture waste heat (e.g.
heat from data centers), or can generate heat and/or power have the potential to dramatically reduce natural
gas consumption and move the city closer to its goal. Similarly, there are limitations to achieving a carbon-
neutral transportation system, particularly among heavy-duty vehicles and airplanes. There will likely be some
technological innovations that will be available to address some of the remaining emissions. For the emissions
that cannot be reduced through any of the identified strategies, the city should look to carbon offsets to capture
and store carbon long-term.
Finally, this plan only addresses GHGs that are either emitted within the boundary of the city (Scope 1) or are
emitted indirectly through the purchase of electricity or other energy sources (Scope 2). These are emissions
that can be directly impacted by residents and businesses in the community. Scope 3 emissions include those
that come from the supply chain, such as emissions from food production and distribution. These make up a
substantial amount of global emissions and should be considered for future action plans.
The advanced strategies identified below are long-term strategies that need to begin in the near-term.
Vehicle Travel
45%
Natural Gas
36%
Air Travel
19%
REMAINING EMISSIONS AFTER 2030
Figure 11 By 2030, the city will have reduced its emissions 62% from BAU; this graph shows the
breakdown of the remaining 38% that will need to be reduced through advanced strategies.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 36
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 34
A. IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES FOR THERMAL ENERGY GRIDS
District heating is an underutilized technology that makes use of thermal energy grids. Wherever there is waste
heat, there may be an opportunity to use the heat to meet demands of a nearby thermal load (i.e. heating and
cooling needs). Waste heat can come from sewer mains, anaerobic digestion processes, data centers, or
processing facilities, among others. Opportunities for district heating should be considered for new
developments and in the early planning stages of infrastructure projects to make projects the most cost
effective.
Identify facilities in the community with excess waste heat
Identify facilities with high thermal demand
Determine locations with opportunities to pair waste heat with large thermal loads
Explore recommendations made in the Minnesota 2025 Energy Action Plan
B. EXPLORE OPPORTUNITIES FOR COMBINED HEAT AND POWER
Combined heat and power (CHP) systems simultaneously generate electricity and thermal energy within a single
system. By using the thermal energy, CHP systems achieve much greater efficiency than conventional power
generating systems. While this system is well established in Minnesota, there is still great potential to harness
this resource. Work with the Minnesota Department of Commerce, Division of Energy Resources to explore
opportunities for combined heat and power.
C. ANAEROBIC DIGESTERS FOR WASTE HEAT AND COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS
Anaerobic digestion is a process that uses captured biogas (methane and carbon dioxide) from the
decomposition of organic material to generate heat and/or electricity. Biogas generated from this process can
also be cleaned to remove carbon dioxide and other impurities to produce a renewable product equivalent to
conventional natural gas, referred to as renewable natural gas. Renewable natural gas can serve as a
replacement for any natural gas application and can also be compressed to provide a source of transportation
fuel in place of conventional natural gas. Biogas can also be used to generate electricity in a process called
combined heat and power (mentioned above). Organic materials may include waste from crop residue, manure,
food processing residues, urban yard waste, or organic waste collected from businesses and residents.
Coordinate with Minneapolis, Hennepin County, and the State to explore opportunities for regional
anaerobic digester from organics collection
Identify opportunities to purchase compressed natural gas from methane capture at closed landfill sites
(e.g. Eden Prairie)
Promote development projects like the Eco-Village and Creative Center that uses anaerobic digestion to
supply electricity
D. FUEL SWITCHING
Deep decarbonization efforts may require shifting end-uses to low or no-carbon energy sources. By 2040, to be
carbon neutral, many appliances that currently use natural gas will need to be switched to an alternative fuel
(e.g. electricity, biomass, or renewable gas). For instance, many water heaters, boilers and furnaces, gas ranges,
and dryers use natural gas to operate. Implementing energy efficiency actions alone will not get these systems
to carbon neutral. They will either need to be offset through additional renewable energy credit purchases, or
be replaced by an alternative clean fuel. There may also be opportunity to use energy saving technologies like
ground-source heat pumps for new construction, or air-to-air heat pumps for existing buildings.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 37
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 35
Because these types of appliances are long-term investments (e.g. a new boiler can have a 20 to 30-year life-
cycle), there are few opportunities within the 2040 timeframe to replace them with electric options. The shift to
alternative fuels would need to begin to occur in the early 2020s and ramp up toward the end of the decade. A
challenge to achieving widespread fuel switching is that in many cases natural gas is cheaper than electricity and
it may not make economic sense for people to switch to electricity. However, there may be opportunities to
combine fuel switching with solar energy systems and storage to minimize or eliminate the cost difference.
Pathways to Deep Decarbonization - This report, completed by the Sustainable Development Solutions Network
(SDSN) and the Institute for Sustainable Development and International Relations (IDDRI) examines the technical
and economic feasibility of such a transition in the United States, evaluating the infrastructure and technology
changes required to reduce U.S. GHG emissions in the year 2050 by 80% below 1990 levels, consistent with a
global emissions trajectory that limits the anthropogenic increase in earth’s mean surface temperature to less
than 2°C.
E. CARBON OFFSETS
The city may wish to consider carbon offsets to meet its goals. Carbon offsets can include the purchase of
renewable energy credits or the promise of carbon sequestration (i.e., the storing of carbon dioxide) through
tree planting. The city has a goal to receive 100% of its energy from renewable sources by 2030; it may wish to
expand that goal to produce more electricity
than is consumed and set a goal to achieve 120%
of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030.
The additional electricity can be used to offset
travel emissions or natural gas consumption.
Renewable Energy Credits can be purchased
through utility programs or through a RECs
broker.
The city is planning to implement an aggressive
tree planting project. The city can use iTree to
inventory trees in its urban forest and calculate
current and future carbon sequestration.
F. EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
It is in an exciting time for advances in energy technologies. Tesla continues to advance the EV market, storage,
and integrated rooftop solar. New companies start up with frequency and bring innovation to the market that
can transform the way we use energy in impactful ways. The city should continue to be aware of technologies as
they emerge, pilot innovations, and encourage further deployment.
G. SCOPE 3 EMISSIONS
Carbon accounting is measured across three categories of emissions which are referred to as “scopes”. Scope 1
emissions are those that occur within the boundary of a city. For example, all transportation emissions,
industrial processes, or cooking with a gas range within a city are Scope 1. Scope 2 emissions include all grid-
supplied energy. Electricity is used in homes and businesses, but the emissions are often outside a city’s
boundary at a centralized power plant. Scope 1 and 2 emissions are included in this plan. A consideration for the
city in the future is to study its impact on Scope 3 emissions — indirect, out-of-boundary emissions — and
determine if and how it wants to address them. These emissions include travel by residents and businesses
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 38
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 36
outside the city boundary, emissions of goods brought into the community, etc. They are often more
complicated to accurately capture, however they have a big impact on global emissions.
Successful implementation of the advanced strategies will help the city become carbon neutral by 2040. The
darker gray wedges in Figure 12 represent how the advanced strategies help the city achieve its goal. In this
graph, much of these emissions reductions occur after 2030. However, for these strategies to be successful, the
city will need to start planning for implementation in the next five to ten years as many will require considerable
time for study, development, and deployment.
Figure 12 Greenhouse gas emissions by sector, City of St. Louis Park, City Operations. 2015.
-
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
800,000
900,000
1,000,000
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040
tonnes CO2e
PLANNED EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS BY SECTOR
Commercial/Industrial Efficiency
Residential Efficiency
Electric Grid Mix
Renewable Energy
Travel Strategies
Waste Strategies
Advanced Thermal Strategies & Offsets
Advanced Travel Strategies & Offsets
Business-As-Usual Goal
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 39
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 37
City Operations
While city operations comprise just 1.5% of total city emissions, it is important for city leaders to track and
demonstrate how goals in the Climate Action Plan can be achieved. The following provides recommended
actions to guide city leaders and staff as they set internal targets to achieve emissions reductions.
A greenhouse gas assessment was completed for St. Louis Park City Operations and involved a thorough review
of energy consumption and associated emissions. The report identified the largest energy users and breaks
down GHG emissions by source. This assessment serves as the basis for informed decision-making to reduce
emissions, supporting the city’s goal of being carbon neutral by 2040. Using this information, city staff can set
annual targets to achieve emissions reduction through efficiency, conservation, and to make plans for
renewable energy procurement, through on-site installations, community solar subscriptions, or the purchase of
renewable energy credits.
Figure 13 illustrates GHG emissions by sector from the city’s various operations. The largest emitter of GHG
emissions is the building and facilities sector, making up over half of total emissions. Pumping water,
transportation fuels, and streetlights are also significant sources of GHG emissions. The data contained in this
assessment may be used by city staff to develop targets and track progress.
Buildings and
facilities
53%
Streetlights and
signals
6%
Potable water
24%
Sewers
4%
Liquid fuels
13%
GHG EMISSIONS BY SOURCE CATEGORY, 2015
Figure 13 Data source: City Operations GHG assessment
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 40
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 38
CITY BUILDINGS AND FACILITIES
The city operations greenhouse gas inventory identified the largest energy users among public buildings. These
buildings have the greatest opportunity to achieve carbon reductions. The Rec Center stands out as the largest
emitter of GHGs, while the Westwood Hills Nature Center is the lowest.
Figure 14 CO 2 Emissions for largest users in buildings and facilities sector.
Table 2, below, illustrates how the potential solar resource compares to the electricity consumed by each of the
largest users. It also includes an estimate of the solar availability for each building as a percent of consumption.
A GIS mapping tool was used to estimate the rooftop solar resource and does not account for mechanical
equipment, structural integrity of rooftops, or other barriers that may reduce access to the solar resource and
may overestimate potential. Site assessments should be completed to understand the true generation potential.
Building Capacity
(KW)
Potential
Generation (KWh)
Electricity
Consumption (KWh)
Solar as percent of
consumption
Rec Center 629.42 818,234 3,006,300 27%
Municipal Service Center 816.51 1,061,466 619,999 171%
Hamilton House 1 149.56 194,432 631,869 31%
City Hall 88.34 114,836 514,400 22%
Police Department 196.63 255,613 496,640 51%
Fire Station 1 146.34 190,243 302,990 63%
Fire Station 2 103.32 134,320 140,894 95%
Westwood Hills Nature Center 22.11 28,738 70,050 41%
Total 2130.12 2,769,144 5,713,092 48%
Table 2 Solar energy potential as percent of electricity consumption.
1 The Hamilton House is a Public Housing building that is owned and operated by the Housing Authority, not the City of St.
Louis Park. It is included in this list because the city tracks its energy and water use through the B3 benchmarking program.
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
C
O
2
e
t
o
n
n
e
s
CO2e for
Major Buildings
Dual normalized CO2e
Total CO2e
Rec Center
Municipal Service
Center
Hamilton House
City Hall
Police Dept.
Fire Station #1
Fire Station #2
Westwood Hills Nature
Center
Linear (Total CO2e)
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 41
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 39
St. Louis Park has several opportunities to use its public sector solar resources. The city’s rooftop solar resources
are substantial and may, in some cases, meet a significant portion of on-site electric energy use in the same
building. Most sites have the potential to receive at least 25% of energy consumption from rooftop solar. The
Municipal Service Center may be able to capture up to 171% from solar, which exceeds the benefits of net
metering (net metering is limited to 120% of customer’s on-site annual electric consumption). To capture the full
benefit of solar on this roof space, the city should explore community solar.
City Action:
The city has a goal to achieve 100% of its electricity from renewable sources by 2030. This can be achieved at the
city operations level through a combination of actions.
• Set an internal goal to receive at least 10% of the city’s electricity from on-site solar
• Use the solar mapping to prioritize which buildings the city intends to install solar on
• Explore solar carport opportunities for parking areas (see Mill Valley Rec Center)
• Complete solar site assessments with a solar installer for priority buildings
• Complete a structural analysis and electrical service evaluation of rooftops
• Maximize rooftop solar on all public buildings with a good solar resource
• Ensure there is an element for storage plus solar, or storage-ready solar in any RFP issued by the city
• Use the city’s sustainable purchasing policy to purchase on-site solar installations and/or renewable
energy credits for the remaining electricity (the electricity that is not covered by on-site solar)
• Identify financing and incentive opportunities (rebates, production incentives, third-party financing)
• Explore opportunities for ground-mount systems to increase the amount of local generation
• Track progress and share success
The city can maximize building energy efficiency by implementing the following:
• Ensure all buildings and facilities are benchmarked and kept up-to-date in B3
o Work to have all utility bills automatically uploaded to B3 database
o Consider Portfolio Manager as an additional or alternative benchmarking tool (B3 and Xcel allow
for automatic uploads to Portfolio Manager), buildings may be eligible to achieve ENERGY STAR
certification
• Participate in State financing programs like the Guaranteed Energy Savings Program (GESP) or Local
Energy Efficiency Program (LEEP)
• Prioritize improving the efficiency of the city’s largest energy user (i.e. the Rec Center)
o Consider solar thermal heating for the pool
o Explore opportunities for ground-source heat-pumps for the ice arenas
o Expand white roof to the entire rooftop
• Require green building or net-zero energy standards for all new public buildings, and for major
renovations of existing buildings
• Encourage energy efficient behavior changes by all staff (e.g. turn computers off at night, eliminate any
personal space heaters or refrigerators)
The following measures can be tracked using GreenStep Cities Step 4:
• Number of city-owned and private renewable energy generation sites
• Generation capacity at city and at private renewable energy generation sites
• Annual renewable energy purchases
• Percent of total energy use that is generated and purchased renewable energy
• Percent of total city energy use that is purchased from a community solar garden
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 42
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 40
POTABLE WATER AND SEWERS
The potable water production sector (wells, pumps, reservoirs, and the water treatment plant facilities) is
second largest emitter of GHGs. Potable water accounts for about a quarter of the GHG emissions from city
operations. Emissions from this sector have been declining over the past several years, in part due to Xcel
Energy’s cleaner grid mix, and to an increase in efficiency of variable drive motors.
Many of the water treatment plants and pumps have seen a decrease in energy use in the 10-year period of the
analysis. However, there are a few plants and pumps that have increased energy consumption, including Water
Treatment Plants 1 and 10, and Well 10 Pump House.
The major source of emissions from potable water production comes from electricity.
Figure 13 GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas consumption for potable water
City Action
Identify opportunities to improve efficiency and increase renewable energy production and consumption.
• Continue efforts to improve the efficiency of potable water delivery
• Enter energy use data into B3
• Identify possible sites for ground mount solar and storage
o Ground mount solar and storage have the added benefit of increasing the resilience of the water
supply system by providing electricity to the system in the event of a power disruption
• Purchase RECs for the remaining electricity usage
• Encourage residents and businesses to reduce water consumption through conservation
• Reduce water consumed by city operations
o Increase native, drought resistant plant coverage
o Collect and use rainwater as an alternative to pumped water for landscape irrigation
The following measures can be tracked using GreenStep Cities Step 4:
• Residential gallons used per person per day
• Business gallons used per job per day
• Annual city operations’ gallons
• Annual energy used per million gallons of water
GHG Emissions by Energy Type for
Potable Water
Electricity Natural Gas
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 43
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 41
CITY FLEET
Liquid fuels consumption is controlled by the Public Works Department, which includes the Parks, Police, and
Fire departments. The liquid fuels sector is the third largest source of GHG emissions for city operations. This
sector includes fuel (gasoline, diesel, etc.) consumed by city vehicles. Both the emissions and consumption levels
decreased between 2005 and 2015, in part due to an increase of in the use of alternative low carbon fuels (E-
85).
City Actions
Actions the city can take to further reduce emissions include:
• Set annual targets to reduce GHG emissions through efficiency, conservation, and renewable energy
o Record daily miles traveled by vehicle
o Identify vehicles that travel fewer than 110 miles (range of a Nissan Leaf) or are idle long enough
between use to be sufficiently charged for longer distances
o As low mileage vehicles are replaced, replace with electric vehicles; EV range will increase as
technology improves (Chevy Bolts have a range of 280 miles)
o For vehicles driven longer distances, purchase fuel efficient, and/or Flex Fuel vehicles that use
low carbon alternative fuels (E-85)
o Identify vehicles that are over-sized for their purpose, replace with right-sized, more efficient
vehicles
o Identify opportunities to reduce VMT through more efficient routes
• Consider GHG emissions in the purchase of new vehicles
o Purchase fuel efficient vehicles when EVs are not available or practical
• Study the feasibility of replacing combustion vehicles with electric vehicles
• Participate in a bulk purchase for fleet vehicles with the State of Minnesota Department of
Administration, or other partnership (Drive Electric Minnesota)
• Install EV charging stations at public facilities for city fleets and personal employee vehicles
• Improve efficiency of routes to reduce vehicle miles traveled
• Convert heavy-duty vehicles to compressed natural gas or biodiesel
• Encourage or incentivize employees to take transit, bike or walk, or telecommute at least once a week
The following measures can be tracked using GreenStep Cities Step 4:
• Vehicle miles traveled (VMT) for gasoline and diesel fleets
• Average miles per gallon (MPG) for gasoline and diesel fleets
• Number of electric vehicles in city fleet
• City employee VMT per day
STREETLIGHTS AND SIGNAL
The Community Energy Report developed by Xcel Energy, suggests the city maintains approximately 1,800 of its
own streetlights. Between 2010 and 2015, the city has replaced 40 to 60 lights each year. At this rate, if the city
were to replace 60 lights each year, all lights would not be replaced for 25 years. To achieve 2040 goals, lights
will need to be replaced at a rate of at least 75 lights each year.
City Action:
• Create a plan to accelerate the rate of replacing streetlights with LED fixtures
• Enter energy use data from streetlights into B3
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 44
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 42
• Consider different lighting options, such as lights combined with solar and storage, motion-sensor lights,
moon-sensor lights, or removing lights in areas that are over lit to maximize energy savings
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Critical infrastructure includes buildings like hospitals, schools, community centers, and emergency responder
centers. These are places where it is necessary to maintain operations in the event of an emergency or a public
health crisis like a prolonged heatwave. Disruption of power to these facilities limits the ability to effectively
respond to the needs of residents. Many of these facilities have back-up generators, which are often fueled by
diesel or natural gas. Advances in solar and storage technologies are increasing the feasibility of replacing fossil
fuel generators with cleaner, more reliable alternatives.
City Action
The city can pair clean energy and storage to provide renewable energy and reliable back-up power to critical
facilities.
• Use the table below to identify critical infrastructure and current back-up power types
• Research opportunities to install solar and storage for daily power supply as well as back-up power
• Ensure any solar and storage installation can function safely as a microgrid in case of a power disruption
• Install solar storage systems above water lines from any potential flooding
Back-up Power for Critical Infrastructure / Facilities
Facility 1 Police Station Facility 2 Fire Station 1
Type Emergency Response Type Emergency Response
Address Address
Generator Yes/No Generator Yes/No
Generator Type Back-up power type:
Resources:
• National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL): Distributed Solar PV For Electricity System Resilience
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 45
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 43
INTERNAL TEAM
Execution of these actions will require staff to be strategic and intentional about reducing emissions through
efficiency, conservation, and clean energy. The creation of an internal team that sets targets and develops a
schedule of action will help drive operations toward achieving city-wide goals.
The team should include:
• Staff across departments
• A designated point-person to keep group on track
• Regular meetings to report progress and advance goals
• Regular updates to council, at least twice per year
There are different methods the city can utilize to achieve the goals of this plan and minimize the additional
pressure it may have on staff and resources. The city is already completing actions that are directly or indirectly
related to the actions outlined in the CAP. By identifying how the CAP can be integrated into the normal
functions of the city, existing resources will be better able to absorb the change. For instance, how the city
spends its money each year has a GHG impact. If the budget is designed to consider greenhouse gas emissions,
additional spending can be avoided in several instances. Further, leveraging existing programs and working with
partners can help externalize some of the burden and distribute the additional load. Additional dedicated
funding will be necessary to achieve the goal of this plan. The city should consider funding mechanisms to
support implementation of emissions reductions action. One option to consider is increasing utility franchise
fees and dedicating any additional revenue to drive efficiency action in the residential, commercial, and
industrial sectors.
Lead – Influence – Inspire
The city has enormous influence over how the community functions. The greatest impact the city has is in areas
where it has decision-making authority. This includes existing policies and regulations that may enhance or
restrict the implementation of carbon reduction strategies. Several of these polices have been identified
throughout this CAP as tools that can be leveraged to support strategies and demonstrate the city’s leadership.
In areas where the city has less control, it should use its influence to support the decision-making entities that
have direct impact on the actions included in the CAP. One example from this plan is that the city is not able to
set its own building code, so it should support legislation or rule-making at the state level that would enable
cities to increase energy standards for all new buildings.
When the city does not have control or influence, but is interested in driving change, it can utilize its platform to
provide information, inspiration, and incentives that support GHG reduction actions. The CAP Resource Hub is a
good example of how the city can centralize much of this plan and create a go-to destination for action. There
are many existing resources from Minnesota energy non-profits that can be adapted to fit the needs of the city.
Specific steps the Internal Team can take are to identify those areas where the city has existing tools that can be
leveraged to achieve action; provide budget and capital improvement recommendations that consider the GHG
impact; integrate support for climate action into regular city communications, where appropriate. Outside of
city functions, the Internal Team can direct action by aligning interests, highlighting success, and inspiring its
businesses and residents to be leaders.
Implementation of this Plan is no small task. It will require a shift in the way city functions to make climate
action part of normal operations. The city has dedication, ingenuity, and community support to be successful.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 46
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 44
Appendix A – Glossary of Terms
• Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) – an integrated system of smart meters, communications
networks, and data management systems that allows communication between customers and
utilities
• Anaerobic digestion – a series of biological processes in which microorganisms break down
biodegradable material in the absence of oxygen; by-product is combustible biogas, which can be
used to generate electricity or heat, or can be processed into renewable natural gas and
transportation fuels
• Building Benchmarking and Beyond (B3) – benchmarking program for public buildings in Minnesota
to measure and monitor energy consumption, costs, and carbon emission through month and
annual reports
• Carbon Offset – a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions achieved in order to compensate for
emissions somewhere else
• Combined Heat and Power (CHP) – cogeneration of useful thermal and electrical energy
• E-85 – high-level ethanol-gasoline blends containing 51%-85% ethanol
• Electric Vehicles (EVs) – vehicles that are powered by an electric powertrain
• Fuel Switching – replacement of non-renewable fossil fuels with clean, renewable fuels
• Greenhouse Gases (GHGs) – gases that contribute to the greenhouse effect by absorbing infrared
radiation, including carbon dioxide, methane and chlorofluorocarbons
• Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) – rating system designed by the United
States Green Buildings Council (USGBC) to evaluate the performance of a building and encourage
market transformation toward sustainable design
• Million British Thermal Units (MMBtu) – a measure of the heat content of fuels or energy sources
• Net Zero Energy (NZE) – an energy-efficient building where, on a source energy basis, the actual
annual delivered energy is less than or equal to the on-site renewable exported energy
• Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) – energy saving measures receive project financing and are
repaid as a separate item on the property tax assessment for a set time period
• Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) – a market-based instrument that represents the property rights
to the environmental, social and other non-power attributes of renewable electricity generation
• Renewable*Connect – clean energy pricing program available to Xcel Energy residential and
commercial customers, includes both solar and wind
• Stretch Energy Code – an optional energy code that municipalities can adopt to meet a higher
standard than the state’s base energy code
• Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) – multiple of centerline mileage and number of motorized vehicles
that travel past a certain location during a specific period of time
• WindSource® – a clean energy pricing program that allows Xcel Energy customers to pay a premium
each month to get some or all electricity from wind energy
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 47
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 45
Appendix B – Climate Resolution
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 48
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 46
Appendix C – Action Schedule Worksheet
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 49
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 47
Appendix D - Resources
• Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) – The Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) program allows
home and business owners to finance efficiency projects through a voluntary assessment on their
property
• Saint Paul Port Authority (Trillion BTU) – The Trillion BTU program, administered by Saint Paul Port
Authority, provides rebates and loans to businesses to complete energy improvements
• MN Department of Commerce (Rev It Up) – Commerce annually solicits a request for proposals (RFP)
from units of local government seeking low-cost, long-term capital to finance community energy
efficiency and renewable energy system projects that are financed via energy savings and/or projected
revenues created by the systems
• Xcel Energy – Offers a variety of rebates and efficiency programs to customers.
• CenterPoint – Offers a variety of rebates and efficiency programs to customers
• Institute for Market Transformation – Provides more rationale behind this type of policy, along with case
study examples and a tool to compare policies across the country
• American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy – The State and Local Policy database includes many
cities’ building energy disclosure policies and their requirements
• Minneapolis – The City of Minneapolis has passed a Building Rating & Disclosure Policy. This document
lays out the rationale of the policy, how it is designed, its benefits, and how it will be enforced
• Lake Street Small Business Energy Coaching Pilot Program – Lake Street Council did extensive outreach
to small businesses on energy efficiency and documented their strategies and lessons learned
• Minnesota Center for Energy and Environment – offers a range of programs targeted at commercial
energy efficiency, including lighting HVAC, financing, and more
• Minnesota Clean Energy Resource Teams – provides resources, tools, and engagement efforts to
implement local energy projects
• Minneapolis green business cost-share program – This is an example of an incentive program
implemented by the City of Minneapolis
• Energy Star for Small Business – Energy Star provides resources and recognition for small and medium
sized businesses
• Xcel Energy Rebates – Offers rebates for efficiency improvements
• CenterPoint Small Commercial Efficiency Program – Offers rebates for high-efficiency equipment
• ACEEE – Successful Practices of Small Commercial Energy Efficiency Programs
• Maplewood – The City of Maplewood has adopted a strong Green Building Program
• SB 2030 – Sustainable building energy standards that achieve net zero development by 2030
• St. Louis Park Green Building Policy - Requires building construction projects that receive or use city
financial assistance to incorporate sustainable development practices
• Center for Energy and Environment – CEE provides a range of services including home energy audits,
home energy squad visits, financing, and assistance implementing energy saving measures
• Energy Fit Homes – CEE has developed an Energy Fitness Score for residential buildings that allows home
owners to see the relative efficiency of their homes
• Xcel Energy – Offers energy audits and a variety of rebates to customers
• CenterPoint Energy – Offers energy audits and a variety of rebates to customers
• Minnesota Weatherization Assistance Program – Provides free home energy upgrades to low-income
homeowners and renters to help save energy and protect against harsh weather
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 50
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 48
• Hennepin County CAP – The Community Action Partnership provides free energy related repairs and
heating bill assistance to low income residents
• Minnesota CUB – Minnesota Citizens Utility Board is a consumer advocacy organization that offers
assistance to utility customers
• Fix-up Program – Financing program offered by Minnesota Housing Finance Agency
• Energy Efficient Mortgage Homeowner Guide: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
• Minnesota Solar Suitability App – allows users to enter their address and see an estimate of their solar
resource and production
• Google Project Sunroof – similarly allows users to see an estimate of solar resource and production.
• CERTs - The Clean Energy Resource Teams have a wide variety of resource on solar energy, particularly
community solar gardens
• Clean Energy Project Builder - This site aims to bring together all the information you need to plan a
clean energy project, including a search function for installers and funding sources.
• SolSmart Certification - SolSmart provides recognition and no-cost technical assistance to help local
governments reduce barriers to solar energy growth
• Solarize - The Solarize approach allows groups of homeowners or businesses to work together to
collectively negotiate rates, competitively select an installer, and increase demand through a creative
limited-time offer to join the campaign
• Solar Power Hour – One-hour seminars on how solar PV systems work, financial benefits, and an
explanation of the installation process
• Drive Electric Minnesota: Partnership to accelerate the adoption of electric vehicles in Minnesota.
• Metropolitan Area Planning Council, example of flexible parking standards and national examples
• Explore recommendations made in the Minnesota 2025 Energy Action Plan
• Pathways to Deep Decarbonization: A study completed to identify a path toward deep decarbonization
through electrification of the energy system
• National Renewable Energy Lab (NREL): Distributed Solar PV For Electricity System Resilience
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 51
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 49
Appendix E – GHG Report Summary for City Operations
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 52
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 50
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 53
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 51
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 54
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 52
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 55
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 53
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 56
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 54
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 57
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 55
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 58
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 56
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 59
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 57
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 60
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 58
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 61
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 59
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 62
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 60
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 63
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 61
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 64
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 62
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 65
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 63
Appendix F – Wedge Diagram Methodology
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 66
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 64
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 67
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 65
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 68
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 66
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 69
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 67
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 70
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 68
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 71
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 69
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 72
ST. LOUIS PARK – CLIMATE ACTION PLAN 70
To see the completed methodology,
visit: https://www.regionalindicatorsmn.com/customer_media/WedgeToolMethodology_September2017.pdf
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8a)
Title: Climate Action Plan Page 73
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Action Agenda Item: 8b
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Construction of Fastpitch Fields at Aquila Park
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution establishing and approving plans and
specifications, and authorizing advertisement for bids for fastpitch fields at Aquila Park.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council want to proceed with this project by
authorizing staff to go out for bids?
SUMMARY: On November 6, 2017, Council authorized staff to enter into a contract with WSB
& Associates to prepare plans and specifications for a project that would reorient and create two
fastpitch softball fields at Aquila Park.
NEXT STEPS: The demolition of the lights and removal of fences began in the fall of 2017. A
bid opening is scheduled for April 5. Construction will begin as soon as weather permits. The goal
is to seed the site in August or early September of 2018. To allow the grass adequate time to take
root, experts recommend that new fields not be played on until the fall of 2019.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The estimate for the Aquila Park
improvements is $1.2 million (includes cost of contract with WSB but does not include cost for
lights at Aquila since upgrades were planned prior to this project being discussed). During the time
this project was being considered by the Council, the idea of adding lights at Dakota Park was also
discussed. As a result, staff has included as a ‘bid alternate” in the bidding documents the Dakota
field lighting improvements as well to see if there are any economies of scale. That way we can
determine the cost to make that improvement and the Council can decide it if wishes to move
forward with it.
Funding Sources
Park Improvement Fund $ 555,000
G. O. Charter Bonds 400,000
Hennepin Youth Sports Grant 200,000
Twins Community Fund 45,000
Total $ 1,200,000
NEXT STEPS AND TIMELINES: If the City Council approves the plans and specifications and
authorizes bids, bids will be received on April 5 and Council will be asked to approve the lowest
responsible bidder and authorize the project on April 16. Construction would be expected to begin
around May 1 and be completed by the Fall of 2018.
VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged
community.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution
Prepared by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Title: Construction of Fastpitch Fields at Aquila Park
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE PROJECT REPORT,
ESTABLISHING THE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR FASTPITCH FIELDS AT AQUILA PARK
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report related to
fastpitch fields at Aquila Park.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis
Park, Minnesota, that:
1. The Project Report regarding Project No. 21180322 is hereby accepted.
2.Such improvement as proposed is necessary, cost effective, and feasible as detailed in the
Project Report.
3.The proposed project, designated as Project No. 21180322 is hereby established and
ordered.
4.The plans and specifications for the addition of fastpitch fields at Aquila Park, as prepared
under the direction of Parks Superintendent, or designee, are approved.
5.The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official
newspaper and in relevant industry publications, an advertisement for bids for the making
of said improvement under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time of receipt of bids, and specify
the work to be done, state the date and time bids will be received by the City Clerk, and
that no bids will be considered unless sealed and filed with the City Clerk and accompanied
by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid.
6.Parks Superintendent, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council
shortly after the letting date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Action Agenda Item: 8c
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, the City and Sherman
Development Associates LLC
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution approving the Preliminary
Development Agreement between the EDA, the City, and Sherman Associates.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the EDA/City Council support the proposed Preliminary
Development Agreement with Sherman Associates which formalizes the respective parties’
obligations relative to preparing a mixed-use redevelopment plan for the Beltline Blvd. Station
Site?
SUMMARY: At the November 20, 2017 Special Study Session, the EDA/City Council selected
Sherman Associates as the development team with which it wishes to partner to redevelop the
SWLRT Beltline Blvd. Station Site. As a result, staff was directed to prepare a Preliminary
Development Agreement (PDA) between the EDA, the City and Sherman in which the parties
pledge to work cooperatively together toward a mutually acceptable mixed-use redevelopment
project plan for the Beltline Station Site. The purpose of the PDA is to formalize the respective
parties’ obligations under the SWLRT Funding Agreements with the Metropolitan Council and
the Congestion Mitigation Air Quality (CMAQ) grant with the Federal Transit Administration for
the structured public parking at the SWLRT Beltline Station as well as the parties’ respective
responsibilities relative to further defining the Beltline Station Redevelopment project consistent
with the parties’ mutual objectives. The PDA also provides Sherman Associates with formal
permission to access the Station Site in order to conduct its due diligence. Further included in the
agreement is an outline for applying for land use and zoning changes as well as tax increment
financing assistance. During the term of the PDA, Sherman would be provided with exclusive
rights to negotiate acquisition of the subject properties with the EDA and the City. This is to provide
Sherman with assurance of its ability to secure the subject properties for the proposed mixed use
development. Sherman also agrees to reimburse the EDA for all reasonable out-of-pocket
administrative costs (such as legal and financial consulting fees) it incurs in connection with review
and analysis of the proposed redevelopment. The PDA would terminate if the EDA and City have not
approved a formal Purchase and Redevelopment Contract with Sherman by June 30, 2019.
The proposed PDA requires approval by both the EDA and City Council.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The precise purchase price of the EDA and
City-owned parcels as well as the amount of financial assistance necessary to bring the desired
mixed-use project to fruition at the Beltline Station Site will require further discussion with the
developer once the project’s actual components are fully defined. Implementation of both public
and private redevelopment plans for the Beltline Site will likely require TIF assistance.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution of Approval
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, EDA Executive Director and City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8c) Page 2
Title: Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, the City and Sherman Development Associates LLC
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK
RESOLUTION NO. 18-____
APPROVING PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, THE
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, AND SHERMAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATES LLC
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the “Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”) as follows:
1. Background.
1.01. The City and the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”)own certain property (the “Property”) in the City, which Property has been the subject of certain preliminary negotiations with Sherman Development Associates LLC (the “Developer”) for purposes of constructing a mixed-use (multi-family residential and commercial/office), mixed-income development on the Property and related parking, incorporating renewable energy sources (the “Development”), to enhance and complement a proposed Southwest LRT station adjacent to the Property.
1.02. The City, the Authority and the Developer have determined to enter into a preliminary development agreement (the “PDA”), providing for negotiation of a definitive development contract that will address (among other things) terms under which the Developer will construct the Development on the Property, and the City or Authority may provide certain financial assistance if warranted to make development by the Developer financially feasible.
1.03. The Council has reviewed the PDA, and has determined that it is in the best interests of the City to approve and execute the PDA.
2.Approval of PDA.
2.01. The City approves the PDA, and authorizes and directs the Mayor and City Managerto execute same in substantially the form on file, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and are approved by the Mayor and City Manager, provided that execution of the PDA by such officials will be conclusive evidence of their approval.
2.02. City officials and consultants are authorized to take any other actions necessary to carry out the City’s obligations under the PDA, and to bring a proposed definitive development contract before the City.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Meeting: City Council
Meeting Date: February 5, 2018
Action Agenda Item: 8d
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TITLE: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign
Finance Contributions
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Home
Rule Charter Sec. 12.04 related to Campaign Finance Contributions. A unanimous vote of all 7
councilmembers is required for approval.
POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the proposed Charter amendment
related to campaign finance contributions?
SUMMARY: In 2017 a discrepancy was found between the contents of Sec. 12.04 of the Home
Rule Charter and the campaign contribution limits set forth in Minnesota Statute Section 211A.12.
The City’s Home Rule Charter limits campaign contributions to $250 per year and State Statute
limits campaign contributions to $600 in an election year.
The city attorney provided the opinion that, in this instance, the statute governs and a candidate
may accept contributions up to $600 in an election year. The opinion was based on the fact that
when adopting Minn. Stat. 211A.12 the Legislature specifically referenced Minn. Stat. 410.21 and
stated that the provisions of Minn. Stat. 211A.12 supersede any home rule charter. Therefore, the
contribution limits found in Minn. Stat. 211A.12 govern.
The city council subsequently adopted Resolution No. 17-153 which asked the Charter
Commission to study and make a recommendation as to whether the City’s Charter should be
amended related to campaign finance contribution limits.
The Charter Commission met on October 24, 2017 and December 6, 2017 and approved a
recommendation to amend Section 12.04 of the Home Rule Charter by adding language that
referenced the campaign contribution limits set forth in Minnesota Statute 211A.12. Because this
statute specifically supersedes any conflicting provisions in a Home Rule Charter, the Commission
felt it best to eliminate the discrepancy and to simply reference the limits set forth in statute to
avoid any conflicts that may arise from future amendments at the state level.
At the public hearing on January 16, 2018, the city council requested a legal opinion regarding
provisions 2-5 of Sec. 12.04 of the Charter. The City Attorney’s response is attached for
information and review.
FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable.
SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Draft Ordinance
City Attorney Memo
Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8d) Page 2
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions
ORDINANCE NO. ____-18
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK
HOME RULE CHARTER SECTION 12.04
REGARDING CAMPAIGN FINANCE CONTRIBUTIONS
PREAMBLE
WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 410.12, Subd. 7 the Charter Commission has
recommended to the City Council that the Charter be amended as provided herein; and
WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 410.12, Subd. 7 provides that upon recommendation of the Charter
Commission the City Council may enact a Charter Amendment by ordinance.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN:
SECTION 1. The St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Section 12.04 is hereby amended by
deleting stricken language and adding underscored language:
Section 12.04. Contributions.
(1) A candidate or personal campaign committee may not accept aggregate contributions made
by an individual or committee in excess of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) in any year
the contribution limits provided for in Minnesota Statutes Section 211A.12.
(2) Every person who receives a contribution or loan for a personal campaign committee shall,
on demand of the treasurer, and in any event, within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the
contribution or loan, furnish the treasurer with the name and, if known, address of the
contributor or lender, the amount contributed or loaned and the date of receipt.
(3) No anonymous contributions in excess of twenty dollars ($20.00) or any anonymous
contributions aggregating in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) in any calendar year
shall be retained by the personal campaign committee, but shall be forwarded to the City
Clerk and deposited to the general fund of the City. This subdivision shall not apply to
anonymous contributions aggregating in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) arising
from fund raising sales, where in consideration of a contribution or contributions, a person
receives any tangible goods whose value has a reasonable relationship to the contribution.
(4) All contributions of fifty dollars ($50.00) or more shall be made by check, bank draft or
money order.
(5) All monetary contributions received by or on behalf of any candidate or personal campaign
committee shall be deposited within fourteen (14) days after receipt in an account
designated “campaign fund of (name of personal campaign committee).”
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8d) Page 3
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions
SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect ninety days after its publication.
Date of Publication Notice of Public Hearing December 28, 2017
Public Hearing and First Reading January 16, 2018
Second Reading February 5, 2018
Date of Publication of adopted
Ordinance
February 15, 2018
Date Ordinance takes effect May 16, 2018
Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018
Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor
Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution:
Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney
1
196089v1
MEMORANDUM
To: Melissa Kennedy
From: Soren M. Mattick
Re: Campaign Finance
Date: January 19, 2018
______________________________________________________________________________
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
1. Is a City Charter provision that requires candidates to furnish the name and address of a
contributor to their political campaign and the amount contributed valid?
2. Is a City Charter provision that requires candidates to forward anonymous campaign
contributions in excess of $20 and anonymous campaign contributions aggregating in excess
of $100 in a calendar year to the City Clerk to be deposited in the City general fund valid?
3. Is a City Charter provision that requires contributions of $50.00 or more to be made by
check, bank draft, or money order valid? Can the provision be amended to expressly include
credit cards?
4. Is a City Charter provision that requires all monetary contributions received by a candidate to
be deposited within 14 days after receipt in an account designated “campaign fund of
(personal campaign committee)” valid?
DISCUSSION
I.The City Charter provision that requires candidates to furnish the
name and address of a contributor to their political campaign and the
amount contributed is valid.
City Charter Section 12.04 (2) provides:
Every person who receives a contribution or loan for a personal campaign
committee shall, on demand of the treasurer, and in any event, within fourteen
(14) days after receipt of the contribution or loan, furnish the treasurer with the
name and, if known, address of the contributor or lender, the amount contributed
or loaned and the date of receipt.
State election law requires that candidates for city offices report the names and
amounts of contributions in certain circumstances. Under Minn. Stat. § 211A.02 subd. 1,
a candidate who receives contributions or makes disbursements of more than $750 in a
calendar year must submit a report within 14 days of making or receiving the
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8d)
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions
Page 4
2
196089v1
disbursement. The report must include the name of the contributor, the amount
contributed, and the date of the contribution if the individual has made contributions
exceeding $100 in aggregate. Minn. Stat. § 211A.02 subd. 3, is clear these reporting
requirements are in addition to the provisions of any municipal charter.
In addition, under Minn. Stat. § 410.21, the provisions of a city charter control
elections for municipal offices even when a state statute is inconsistent with the city
charter. It is permissible for a city charter to contain election regulations that are
additional to or stricter than the state statutes. As a result, a City Charter provision
requiring candidates in City elections to furnish the name and address of contributors to
their political campaigns and the amount contributed is valid.
There is an apparent conflict between this Section and Section 12.04 (3), which permits
some limited anonymous contributions.
II.The City Charter provision that requires candidates to forward
anonymous campaign contributions in excess of $20 and anonymous
campaign contributions aggregating in excess of $100 in a calendar
year to the City Clerk to be deposited in the City general fund is valid.
City Charter Section 12.04 (3) provides:
No anonymous contributions in excess of twenty dollars ($20.00) or any
anonymous contributions aggregating in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00)
in any calendar year shall be retained by the personal campaign committee, but
shall be forwarded to the City Clerk and deposited to the general fund of the City.
This subdivision shall not apply to anonymous contributions aggregating in
excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) arising from fund raising sales, where in
consideration of a contribution or contributions, a person receives any tangible
goods whose value has a reasonable relationship to the contribution.
Minn. Stat. Ch. 10A regulates campaign finances for elections for state constitutional
offices, state legislative offices, and judicial offices. Under Minn. Stat § 10A.15 subd 1,
A political committee, political fund, principle campaign committee, or party unit
may not retain an anonymous contribution in excess of $20, but must forward it to
the [Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board] for the deposit in the
general account of the state elections campaign account.
While Chapter 10A does not apply to city offices, Section 10A.15 subd. 1 is an indication
that restrictions on anonymous donations are valid. Furthermore, a city charter may impose
additional and stricter election regulations than state statute. See Minn. Stat. § 410.21. A City
Charter provision that requires candidates to deposit anonymous contributions in excess of $20
and anonymous contributions aggregating in excess of $100 in a calendar year with the City
Clerk is valid.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8d)
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions
Page 5
3
196089v1
There is an apparent conflict between this Section and Section 12.04 (2) which requires
every person who receives a contribution to report the name of the contributor. Also, under this
provision a candidate could keep $100 in aggregate anonymous contributions, but if the
candidate receives $101 in aggregate contributions they must forward all the aggregate
anonymous contributions to the City Clerk for deposit in the general fund. That is a somewhat
absurd result.
III.The City Charter provision that requires contributions of $50.00 or
more to be made by check, bank draft,1 or money order is valid.
City Charter Section 12.04 (4) provides:
All contributions of fifty dollars ($50.00) or more shall be made by check, bank
draft or money order.
Presumably this provision was enacted to make it easier to identify contributors and
prevent anonymous contributions by creating a “paper trail” to document contributions. There is
nothing in state law that prevents the City from having a Charter provision that requires
contributions of $50.00 or more to political candidates to be made by check, bank draft, or
money order.
The City Charter could be amended to expressly permit payment by credit card. There is
nothing in state law that prevents contributions by credit card or other means. Both the
Minneapolis and St. Paul mayors’ campaign websites collect donations by credit card. Credit
card payments would not create any new concerns about anonymous giving. Credit card
payments would create the same type of paper trail as checks, bank drafts, and money orders.
IV. The City Charter provision that requires all monetary contributions
received by a candidate to be deposited within 14 days after receipt in
an account designated “campaign fund of (personal campaign
committee)” is valid.
City Charter Section 12.04 (5) provides:
All monetary contributions received by or on behalf of any candidate or personal
campaign committee shall be deposited within fourteen (14) days after receipt in
an account designated "campaign fund of (name of personal campaign
committee)."
A similar provision in state law provides
All contributions received by or on behalf of a candidate, principal campaign
committee, political committee, political fund, or party unit must be deposited in
1 A bank draft is a check drawn on a bank’s funds and is guaranteed by the bank that issues it. It
is similar to a cashier’s check.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8d)
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions
Page 6
4
196089v1
an account designated “Campaign Fund of . . . (name of candidate, committee,
fund, or party unit).”
See Minn. Stat. § 10A.15 subd. 3. While Chapter 10A does not apply to city offices, Section
10A.15 subd. 3 is an indication that a provision requiring candidates to deposit funds in a
designated campaign account is valid. Furthermore, a city charter may impose additional and
stricter election regulations than state statutes. See Minn. Stat. § 410.21. As a result, the City
Charter provision requiring candidates to deposit funds in a designated campaign account is
valid.
V.An amendment to City Charter Section 12.04 (1) is being proposed to bring it
into conformity with state statute.
City Charter Section 12.04 (1) currently provides:
A candidate or personal campaign committee may not accept aggregate
contributions made by an individual or committee in excess of two hundred fifty
dollars ($250.00) in any year.
(Emphasis added.)
Minn. Stat. § 211A.12 provides:
“A candidate or a candidate’s committee may not accept aggregate contributions
made or delivered by an individual or committee in excess of $600 in an election
year for the office sought and $250 in other years”
(Emphasis added.)
The City Charter may not be more restrictive than the Minn. Stat. § 211A.12 regarding
the amount of contributions a candidate may accept from an individual or committee because
Minn. Stat. § 211A.12 specifically states that “[n]otwithstanding sections 211A.02, subd. 3, and
410.21, this section supersedes any home rule charter.” But for this language, the City Charter
could have been more restrictive than state law.
Because of the conflict between the City Charter and state statue, and because the state
statute specifically preempts the City Charter with regard to the aggregate amount of
contributions a candidate may receive from an individual or committee, the following change has
been recommended:
A candidate or personal campaign committee may not accept aggregate
contributions made by an individual or committee in excess of two hundred fifty
dollars ($250.00) in any year the contribution limits provided for in Minnesota
Statutes Section 211A.12.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8d)
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions
Page 7
5
196089v1
CONCLUSION
The City Council should adopt the amendment to City Code Section 12.04 (1) to bring it
into conformity with state law. City Code Section 12.04 (2)-(5) are all valid. However, the
language in some of these provisions may need to be revised for clarity.
City Council Meeting of February 5, 2018 (Item No. 8d)
Title: Second Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions
Page 8