Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018/01/16 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA JANUARY 16, 2018 5:30 p.m. Vision 3.0 Celebration / Reception – Council Chambers 7:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – Council Chambers 1.Call to Order 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2.Presentations 2a. St. Louis Park is “Not For Sale” Proclamation 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 3b. City Council Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018 4.Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda. Recommended Action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 5. Boards and Commissions -- None 6.Public Hearings 6a. First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions Recommended Action: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. Motion to approve the first reading of an Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Sec. 12.04 related to Campaign Finance Contributions. A unanimous vote of all 7 councilmembers is required for approval. 7.Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8.Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items – None 9.Communications – None Immediately following City Council Meeting SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community Room Discussion Items 1. 2018 Pavement Management Project Update Meeting of January 16, 2018 City Council Agenda CONSENT CALENDAR 4a. Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $56,186.37 for Project 4016-1100 MSA Street Rehabilitation – Flag Avenue / Quentin Avenue, City Contract No. 92-16 4b. Adopt Resolution authorizing staff to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County. The agreement is for a feasibility study to consider connections across the BNSF Railroad adjacent to Highway 100 - Project No. 4018-2000. 4c. Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of temporary parking restrictions in front of 4245 Toledo Avenue. 4d. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 06-028-24-41-0041. 4e. Adopt Resolution to recognize Public Service Worker Randy Lawrence for more than 37 years of service. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular City Council meetings are carried live on Civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for Video on Demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of City Hall and on the text display on Civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website. Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call the Administration Department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting. Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Presentation: 2a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: St. Louis Park is “Not For Sale” Proclamation RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Mayor is asked to read the attached Proclamation meant to help raise awareness and boost programs aimed at keeping persons from being exploited through human trafficking. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: The City of St. Louis Park appreciates the commitment of our law enforcement officials and the many nonprofit organizations across Minnesota that are taking aggressive action and working together to end sexual exploitation. The community of St. Louis Park is encouraged to undertake efforts to raise awareness, provide education and offer support to victims. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Proclamation Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 2a) Page 2 Title: St. Louis Park is “Not For Sale” Proclamation PROCLAMATION ST. LOUIS PARK IS “NOT FOR SALE” WHEREAS, sexual exploitation is defined as the sexual abuse of someone who engages in or is forced to engage in commercial sexual activity, which occurs when anything of value or a promise of anything of value is provided to a person by any means in exchange for any type of sexual activity; and WHEREAS, victims of sexual exploitation come from every background, race, gender, sexual orientation and economic status; and WHEREAS, a comprehensive Minnesota study released in August 2017 found that buyers typically are white middle-age males; WHEREAS, the perpetrators of sexual exploitation cause great harm and trauma to their victims and to families, and undermine the stability, safety and well-being of our communities; and WHEREAS, law enforcement officials and nonprofits across Minnesota are taking aggressive and new action to crack down on buyers of commercial sex and boosting programs aimed at prevention measures for keeping persons from being exploited and trafficked; and WHEREAS, survivors of sexual exploitation have bravely confronted this issue by telling their stories and leading multidisciplinary coalitions of advocates to support victims of this crime and to educate communities; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Health and Minnesota Department of Human Services as well as other state and nonprofit agencies, and local municipalities and law enforcement agencies are working together towards providing supportive victim-centered services; and WHEREAS, the St. Louis Park Police Department has conducted training in human trafficking awareness for St. Louis Park hotels and partnered with other metro-area police departments to provide training on this topic for rental property owners. NOW THEREFORE, let it be known that the Mayor and City Council do hereby declare that St. Louis Park is “Not For Sale” and wish to raise awareness about sexual exploitation. WHEREFORE, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 16th day of January, 2018. _______________________________ Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Minutes: 3a UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 18, 2017 1. Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Gregg Lindberg, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Susan Sanger. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Inspections Director (Mr. Hoffman), Fire Chief (Mr. Koering), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Operations & Recreation Director (Ms. Walsh), CFO (Mr. Simon), Economic Development Coordinator (Mr. Hunt), Community Development Director (Ms. Barton), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Shamla), Project Coordinator (Mr. Amatuccio), Westwood Hills Nature Center Manager (Mr. Oestrich), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guests: Nancy Blankford, Architect; Martha Ingram, EDA Attorney 1a. Pledge of Allegiance 1b. Roll Call 2. Presentations 2a. Introduction and Welcome of New CERT Members Fire Chief Koering introduced Justin Grays as the newest member of the CERT Team, bringing the total number of CERT members to 27. He explained that the CERT Team is a group of volunteers who are trained for emergency preparedness to assist citizens and help first responders gather information following a disaster. Additionally, CERT members are a resource for any community events where volunteers are needed. Chief Koering stated that the goal is to consistently have a team of 40 active CERT members in place. Councilmember Brausen thanked Chief Koering for the wonderful job being done with the CERT Team. He thanked all the CERT team members for their ongoing work and Mr. Gray for his willingness to serve. Chief Koering stated that residents who are interested in serving on the CERT Team should check the city and/or Fire Department websites, or call the department coordinator or the Chief himself at Fire Station #1. 3. Approval of Minutes City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 3a. City Council Special Study Session Minutes December 4, 2017 It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to approve the December 4, 2017 Special Study Session Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. City Council Minutes December 4, 2017 It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the December 4, 2017 City Council Meeting Minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar 4a. Approve the second reading and Adopt Ordinance No. 2529-17 amending the Solid Waste Management code and to approve the Ordinance Summary for publication. 4b. Adopt Resolution No. 17-189 to recognize Police Lieutenant Lori Dreier for 26 years of service. 4c. Authorize execution of a professional services contract with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. in the amount of $134,396.00 for the Mobility Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan Update. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 17-190 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $82,121.04 for the Fixed Network Water Meter Replacement Project with Ferguson Waterworks - Project No. 5015-0001, City Contract No. 91-15. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 17-191 authorizing execution of a contract with Summit Envirosolutions for 2018 consultant services related to the implementation of the Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation (Reilly) Consent Decree/Remedial Action Plan (CD/RAP). Councilmember Brausen noted item 4e related to a consulting contract for Reilly Tarpit, and asked if this information will be available on the city website. Mr. Harmening stated that it will be added to the website. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions – None 6. Public Hearings 6a. 2018 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvement Project (4018-1101) Public Hearing. Mr. Shamla explained the proposed street rehabilitation project scope, including improvement on Cambridge Street, Oxford Street, Lake Street, Murphy Avenue and the alley south of Lake Street. Hopkins and St. Louis Park staff have also identified Texas City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 Avenue and Division Street for rehabilitation. Mr. Shamla added that the project includes sidewalk reconstruction and miscellaneous utility rehabilitation, along with installation of a bikeway connecting to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. Councilmember Mavity stated that some neighbors have submitted a petition objecting to parts of this project. She asked if the project is a package deal or if it will be handled piece by piece. Mr. Shamla stated that the bike lanes on Texas Avenue between Highway 7 and Lake Street were approved by the council in February, 2017. He added that tonight’s public hearing is about the proposed sidewalks, while the roads themselves will remain the same. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. Nick Steen, 3729 Texas Ave. S., stated that the proposed sidewalk will go right through his front yard, and he would be losing multiple trees. He stated that it doesn’t make sense, especially if the root system of his maple tree is damaged. He added that he would lose 11 feet of his driveway. He said that he will not be able to park in the street and wondered where visitors would park. He stated that if a sidewalk is installed, it needs to be at the curb line and not in residents’ yards. He noted that Hopkins does not have sidewalks and asked why St. Louis Park needs them. He has lived in his home for 15 years and does not like the idea of losing his driveway and yard to a sidewalk. Mark Bord, 7922 Division St., stated that he lives on the corner of Division Street and Texas Avenue and has been there 20 years. He added that he grew up in St. Louis Park and has lived here for over 60 years. He agreed with Mr. Steen, stating that his house will be 10 feet from the sidewalk. Even if trees are replaced by the city, it will take years for new trees to grow to the current size of the trees in his neighborhood. He added that walking traffic down Texas Avenue is minimal, and sidewalks are not needed. He stated that sidewalks will bring the property values down, and he will lose 11 feet of his driveway. He asked the council to vote “no” to installing sidewalks, and added he that was not notified about the bike paths. He stated that there is never much bike traffic on his street either. Emmy Lenzen, 3831 Texas Ave. S., stated that she lives on the corner of Lake Street and Texas Avenue, and initially was against this project. However, over time she changed her mind about it and is looking at it for the greater good of safety for the many kids and pets in the neighborhood. Because of this, she now supports the sidewalks. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to continue the public hearing regarding establishing Improvement Project No 4018-1101 for the Rehabilitation of Texas Avenue and Division Street to January 2, 2018. The motion passed 7-0. 6b. On-Sale Intoxicating and On-Sale Sunday Liquor License for ResBiz, LLC dba Blue Fox Indian Bar & Grill. Ms. Deno stated that the city received an application from ResBiz, LLC to become the new owner of Blue Fox Indian Bar & Grill. The existing restaurant, located at the West End, has been in operation since 2015 and the current owner has reached an agreement to sell the business to ResBiz, LLC. She noted that the Police Department conducted a full City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 background investigation and nothing was discovered that would warrant denial of the license. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Miller, to approve On-Sale Intoxicating and On-Sale Sunday Liquor License for ResBiz, LLC dba Blue Fox Indian Bar & Grill, located at 5377 W. 16th St., for the license term through March 1, 2018. The motion passed 7-0. 6c. CMS Lodging Services Inc. dba Courtyard Minneapolis West – On-Sale Intoxicating and On-Sale Sunday Liquor License. Ms. Deno stated that the city received an application from CSM Lodging Services, Inc., dba Courtyard Minneapolis West, for an on-sale intoxicating and on-sale Sunday liquor license for the property located at 9980 Wayzata Blvd. She noted that the Police Department conducted a full background investigation and nothing was discovered that would warrant denial of the license. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Lindberg, to approve CMS Lodging Services Inc. dba Courtyard Minneapolis West for an On-Sale Intoxicating and On-Sale Sunday Liquor License for the premises located at 9980 Wayzata Blvd with a license term through March 1, 2018. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items 8a. 2018 Budget, Final City and HRA Property Tax Levies, and 2018-2027 Capital Improvement Plan. Resolution No. 17-193, Resolution No. 17-194, and Resolution No. 17-195 Mr. Simon presented the 2018 final property tax levy, which is a 4.9% increase over the 2017 tax levy. He noted the HRA levy allowed by state statue at 0.0185%, and the 2018 Budgets for General, Enterprise, Special Revenue, and select Capital Project funds. Additionally, Mr. Simon noted the 2018-2027 Capital Improvement Plan. He noted the city’s AAA credit rating, which ensures the lowest interest rates based on bond sales, and the fact that the CIP plan is updated annually, and tied into the long-range financial plan. Councilmember Brausen stated that he sees this as a responsible budget, which continues to pay staff wages and provide benefits and high-quality services to the citizens of St. Louis Park. He added that the city continues to reinvest in valued community assets and City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 amenities. He supports this budget and the very transparent and vigorous process staff has provided. Councilmember Hallfin agreed. Mayor Spano stated that during the budget process, staff takes direction from council and then develops the budget, working to keep the levy as low as possible. He added that this is the third year in a row the final levy has decreased. It is a testament to good planning, a good credit rating, and sound fiscal work by staff. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 17-193, approving 2018 Budgets and authorizing the 2018 Final Property Tax Levy; to adopt Resolution No. 17-194, Authorizing the 2018 Final HRA Levy; and, to adopt Resolution No. 17-195, Approving 2018-2027 Capital Improvement Plan. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. Westwood Hills Nature Center Project – Schematic Design. Ms. Walsh presented the staff report. Mr. Harmening stated that in 1993 the police station was replaced. In 1997 the Rec Center was upgraded and the water park built. Next the city park buildings were replaced, and in 2009 an addition was built on the Municipal Service Center. Additionally, two fire stations were replaced, City Hall was remodeled, and the Council Chambers was recently remodeled. Mr. Harmening explained that the Westwood Hills Nature Center is now the last major community facility that needs replacing. It is used a lot and is fast becoming obsolete and in need of improvements. He noted that the council reviewed the Nature Center in 2015 and asked staff for a master plan. This evening the schematic design will be viewed, and the ongoing design plan will be reviewed by the council over time. Ms. Walsh stated that this is the beginning of the process, and staff is asking the council for approval of the schematic design this evening. Ms. Blankford explained the plans and design, noting that parking will be closer to the building. The floor plan will include several staff, public, exhibit and multipurpose classroom areas. She also noted the zero energy goals of the development, which will include solar energy use and energy reduction estimates at 47%. Mayor Spano stated that he would prefer staff bring this project back for discussion sooner rather than later, so that the new council members can review it and voice their opinions, as well. Councilmember Brausen stated that he is excited to support this project and sees it as an investment for the community. He noted that there have been 9 council meetings and at least 12 public meetings, in a variety of forums and community listening sessions. He added that the project features the council’s priority of environmental sustainability and is another step in this deliberate process. He stated that while he is concerned about tax increases, this project, with all its environmental considerations, is a bold step, models best practices, and is a way to demonstrate the values of the community. Councilmember City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 Brausen added that the visioning process calls for this improvement to the center, and he looks forward to further public discussion. Councilmember Sanger agreed with Councilmember Brausen’s comments in terms of the center’s environmental importance. She added that the current building is falling apart, and it is less expensive to demolish it and build a new one. She said that it is the right step to take, and it will draw people from all over the metro area. She stated that she will support the schematic design plans. Councilmember Mavity agreed, noting that she will support the schematic design plans for all the same reasons. She stated that there will be much public engagement in this project. Councilmember Hallfin said that he also supports the plans. He stated that he takes the recommendations from the Parks and Recreation Advisory Commission seriously and has been to several of their meeting related to this project. He is looking forward to moving ahead with this project. Councilmember Miller thanked the commission and staff for this plan, but opposed the schematic design, even though he supports the project. He agreed that the nature center is in rough shape; however, he has learned since being on the council that it costs a lot to run and maintain a city. He added that affordable housing, the arts, and climate action plans are areas of concern, as well as the Texa-Tonka neighborhood. He would like to advocate prudence on how the city spends money. He stated that he would like to see more design options that spend half the amount, and he wants to understand more about the long-term financial impacts of the project. He stated that he would like to see alternatives to this schematic design when it comes back to the council in 2018. Councilmember Lindberg stated that as a lifetime resident of St. Louis Park, he considers the Westwood Hills Nature Center as one of the special assets of the community. He stated that the schematic design works, and he thanked Mr. Oestreich and staff for all the work they do at the center. He stated that the center appeals to the city’s core values and ensures leadership in environmental standards. He is happy to support the schematic design. Mayor Spano added that he also supports the schematic design, noting that in a recent meeting with other mayors, it was noted how the nature center is very well liked and attended by residents of adjacent communities. He added that the other mayors stated Westwood Hills Nature Center is one of the things that makes St. Louis Park unique. He stated that he wants to proceed with the design. He would also like to ensure that the classrooms will be used, and he encouraged staff to reach out to school districts in the area to confirm that. Mayor Spano also pointed out that if the zero energy is included, this would be the first commercial building in the state that would be a zero energy building. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to approve the Schematic Design for the Westwood Hills Nature Center project and direct staff to move forward to the Design Development phase. The motion passed 6-1. (Councilmember Miller opposed) City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 7 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 8c. Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor. Resolution No. 17-196 Ms. Deno presented the resolution which limits the number of off-sale intoxicating liquor licenses issued in St. Louis Park. She stated that the city currently has 15 licenses, 14 of which are active and 1 which is not operating at this time. Councilmember Mavity stated that this is an important issue, and she will want to revisit it with the new council to look at developing a new policy. Councilmember Brausen stated that he will oppose this resolution, stating that he would like the free market to determine the number of off-sale establishments, adding that consumers are best served by choice, selection, cost, and size of store. He stated that he is not in favor of a moratorium. Councilmember Sanger agreed, stating that she will oppose this resolution. She is in favor of letting the market decide the number and size of liquor stores that are in St. Louis Park. She added that the council just approved two new liquor licenses this evening, and there is no evidence of a problem. Councilmember Miller agreed with Councilmembers Brausen and Sanger, stating that it feels like the council is crossing the line into commerce and picking winners and losers. It is not the council’s responsibility to do this. He added that he does not see this affecting the health and well-being of the city, and he will not support it. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Hallfin, to adopt Resolution No. 17-196, limiting the number of off-sale intoxicating liquor licenses issued in St. Louis Park. The motion passed 4-3. (Councilmembers Sanger, Brausen and Miller opposed) 8d. Special Assessment for Water and Sewer Availability Charges. Resolution No. 17-188 Ms. Barton presented the staff report. She stated Paul Revere Masonic Center LLC, owner of the commercial building at 6509 Walker St., has requested the city to authorize a special assessment for the water and sewer availability charges due for the planned new tenant, the American Legion, and to assess the cost against the property. Ms. Barton stated that staff recognizes this is a special situation, and if approved by council, staff will write a policy to bring to council at a future meeting, to address any future requests for assessments of SAC and WAC charges. It was moved by Councilmember Miller, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to adopt Resolution No. 17-188, authorizing special assessment for Water and Sewer availability charges (WAC and SAC) for Paul Revere Masonic Center, LLC at 6509 Walker St., St. Louis Park, MN The motion passed 7-0. City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 8 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 8e. Resolution Accepting Annual City Manager Evaluation. Resolution No. 17- 197 Ms. Deno presented the staff report. Mayor Spano provided the summary of the City Manager evaluation for 2017. He stated that after a very robust 360 review process, he is pleased to say again that St. Louis Park has a great City Manager, noting all of the very positive comments. He stated that Mr. Harmening is universally respected by council, staff and residents, who appreciate the level of respect he offers them, as well. He added that Mr. Harmening’s average score was 4.68 out of 5, confirming that our City Manager is competent, professional and cares about the community, staff and residents he serves. Mr. Harmening commented that it is a privilege to work for the City of St. Louis Park, and he looks forward to continuing to do so. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 17-197, formal acceptance of the final City Manager annual evaluation. The motion passed 7-0. 8f. 2018 Non-Union Employee Compensation. Resolution No. 17-198 Ms. Deno stated that the recommendation for 2018 non-union employee compensation is as follows: • Approve 3% standard adjustment to compensation plan for non-union employees, allowing for regular progression through pay ranges • Adjust pay range for City Manager to allow movement through the range consistent with non-union and set formula in compliance with salary cap. • Approve continuation in the Volunteer Firefighter Benefit Program. It was moved by Councilmember Lindberg, seconded by Councilmember Sanger, to adopt Resolution No. 17-198, confirming a 3% general increase for non-union employees effective 1/1/2018; approving the City Manager’s salary for 2018, and continuing participation in the Volunteer Firefighter Benefit Program. The motion passed 7-0. 8g. Recognition of Councilmembers Gregg Lindberg & Sue Sanger Mayor Spano, on behalf of the city council and City Manager, recognized Gregg Lindberg for his years of service as a member of the St. Louis Park City Council representing Ward 3 from January 6, 2014 to January 2, 2018. Mayor Spano, on behalf of the city council and City Manager recognized Sue Sanger for her years of service as a member of the St. Louis Park City Council representing Ward 1 from August 7, 1995 to January 2, 2018. City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3a) Page 9 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of December 18, 2017 Mayor Spano and all the councilmembers thanked outgoing Councilmembers Lindberg and Sanger for their work and friendship over their respective years of service and wished them well in their future endeavors. 9. Communications – Written Reports 9a. NOAH Preservation Workshop – Update 9b. November 2017 Monthly Financial Report 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 9:25 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Minutes: 3b UNOFFICIAL MINUTES CITY COUNCIL MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA JANUARY 2, 2018 1. Call to Order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne Mavity, Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog. Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Communications Manager (Ms. Larson), Community Development Director (Ms. Barton), CIO (Mr. Pires), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), City Clerk (Ms. Kennedy), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Shamla) and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). Guests: Community Members & Nick Amatuccio, consultant. 1. Call to Order 1a. Elected Officials Oath of Office The swearing in of the following newly elected officials of the City of St. Louis Park was performed. They will serve four-year terms commencing January 2, 2018. Councilmember Ward 1 - Margaret Rog Councilmember Ward 2 - Anne Mavity Councilmember Ward 3 - Rachel Harris Councilmember Ward 4 - Tim Brausen After the oaths were administered, each new official signed an oath certificate, which is kept on file in the City Clerk’s office. 1b. Pledge of Allegiance 1c. Roll Call 2. Presentations – None 3. Approval of Minutes 3a. City Council Special Study Session Minutes December 11, 2017 It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve the December 11, 2017 Meeting Minutes as presented. City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018 The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of Agenda and Items on Consent Calendar 4a. Accept for filing City Disbursement Claims for the period of November 25, through December 22, 2017. 4b. Adopt Resolution No. 18-001 designating the St. Louis Park Sun-Sailor as the City’s Official Newspaper for 2018. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 18-002 declaring 2018 City Council meeting dates. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 18-010 appointing the following Councilmembers to the Office of Mayor Pro Tem for the year 2018: Councilmember Term of Appointment Anne Mavity January – April 2018 Steve Hallfin May – August 2018 Tim Brausen September – December 2018 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 18-003 and Resolution No. 18-004 authorizing entering into a Joint Powers Agreement with Edina, and a Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County for the France Avenue Sidewalk (between 39th St. and 42nd St.) Project No. 4018-2000. 4f. Adopt Resolution No. 18-005 approving a Master Partnership Contract with the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) relating to partnering for services. 4g. Adopt Resolution No. 18-006 approving the Agency Agreement between the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the City of St. Louis Park. 4h. Adopt Resolution No. 18-007 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $179,986.42 for Project 4016-1000 Pavement Management (Area 5) with Park Construction, Contract No. 65-16. 4i. Adopt Resolution No. 18-008 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the water service line at 9420 Frederick Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 18-117-21-22- 0139. 4j. Approve for filing Telecommunications Minutes October 25, 2017. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Miller, to approve the Agenda as presented on the Consent Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and Commissions 5a. Approve Appointment of Representatives to the Human Rights Commission It was moved by Councilmember Miller, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to appoint those listed below to the Human Rights Commission for the remainder of the terms as outlined below: Applicant Term Expiration Justin Carlson 5/31/2019 Todd Sandler 5/31/2020 BethAnne Stolp 5/31/2020 City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018 6. Public Hearings 6a. 2018 Hopkins Street and Utility Improvement Project (4018-1101) Public Hearing Continued. Resolution No. 18-009. Mr. Shamla presented the staff report, noting that this was the continuation of the public hearing from December 18, 2017. Mr. Shamla stated that the project within St. Louis Park includes street rehabilitation, sidewalk reconstruction, and miscellaneous utility rehabilitation. In addition, the project includes installation of the bikeway connecting to the Cedar Lake Regional Trail. Bike lanes on Texas Ave between Hwy. 7 and Lake Street were approved by the city council on February 6, 2017. Because the majority of the project is in Hopkins, the City of Hopkins will be the lead agency for the contract. Mr. Shamla explained that the sidewalks are part of the Connect the Park project, adding that after hearing more from residents about the impact of the project on trees in the area, staff took a closer look, and the Environmental Coordinator inspected the trees in the area. Ultimately only 3 trees will be removed, instead of 8, for the project. Mr. Shamla stated that staff has met with residents many times in 2017 about the project, adding that residents can access additional information on the city website. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. Nicholas Steen, 3729 Texas Avenue, presented photos of his lot and the surrounding area, noting trees that will be affected if a sidewalk is placed nearby. He stated that a sidewalk would affect the root system of his large maple, and if that is the case, he asked that the city remove the tree so that it will not fall onto his home. He stated that he is being negatively impacted by losing 11 feet of his driveway. He stated that his neighbor could not be at tonight’s meeting, but he will also be negatively impacted. He added he does not understand why the sidewalk must be 5 feet instead of 4 feet wide, noting that he would prefer no sidewalk at all. Bill Stump, 7904 Division Street, stated that he is speaking on behalf of his neighbors Mr. and Mrs. Borg. He asked staff how they plan to put a sidewalk in with all the trees there. He stated that the sidewalk will depreciate property values and wanted to note in the record that he asked the city to lower taxes in this area because of that. Mr. Shamla stated that there has been an adjustment to the sidewalk at 7922 Division Street, adding that the sidewalk will now meander around 4 maple trees. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. Councilmember Mavity asked staff about the 5-foot versus 4-foot sidewalk and what the approach and recommendations are. Mr. Shamla stated that the sidewalks must be 5 feet as they are city-maintained, and all city equipment is 5 feet wide. He noted ADA requirements also mandate that sidewalks be 5 feet wide. City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018 Councilmember Mavity stated that she appreciated the residents’ comments, adding that she is grateful staff has been creative and responsive on mitigating the impact on the trees. She stated the Connect the Park project was set in motion 5 years ago, after hearing from the community that they wanted a safer walking community. She said that she will support this resolution tonight, with due respect to the neighbors and with staff assurances that they will mitigate individual impacts to homeowners. She added that the sidewalks are for people walking in this area. Safety for pedestrians is especially important in this high traffic area. Councilmember Brausen agreed with Councilmember Mavity, adding that the Connect the Park initiative has brought opposition. However, he understands residents’ feelings about their front yards. He added that this program did come out of an extensive community visioning process. He stated that it is about making neighborhoods more walkable and pedestrian friendly. The vast majority of feedback received is that people do like the system improvements and that children are safer walking on sidewalks. He stated that he is in favor of the project. Councilmember Miller said that he is also in favor of the project. He stated that he was concerned about the trees but is glad that staff has worked to mitigate these issues. He added that he understands residents’ concerns, but he will support this resolution tonight. He thanked staff for their work. Councilmember Harris thanked all the residents who came to speak, noting that she heard all of the comments about trees. She stated how very important the city’s trees are. She added that staff will work to retain as many trees as possible, and she commended staff’s work to mitigate concerns about trees. She stated that she also will support the project. Mayor Spano stated he will support this this resolution and added that he would not encourage taking Mr. Steen’s tree out right now. He suggested that Mr. Steen watch it for any signs of problems as the project progresses and that he notify staff if it becomes diseased. He added that if it is diseased and is in the public right-of-way, the city will take it out. It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to adopt Resolution No. 18-009, accepting the project report, establishing Improvement Project No. 4018-1101 for the Rehabilitation of Texas Avenue and Division Street, including the approval of the preliminary layout for Texas Avenue and Division Street and ordering the development of final plans. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Requests, Petitions, and Communications from the Public – None 8. Resolutions, Ordinances, Motions and Discussion Items – None 9. Communications Mayor Spano noted the Lennox Foundation fundraiser on Tuesday, January 9, from 11 a.m. to 10 p.m., in conjunction with Parkway Pizza. Mayor Spano stated the residents just need City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 3b) Page 5 Title: City Council Meeting Minutes of January 2, 2018 to mention the fundraiser when ordering at Parkway Pizza, and proceeds from the sale of pizza will go toward the foundation. Mr. Harmening noted the upcoming recognition event for former Councilmember Sue Sanger, which will be held on January 11 at the Rec Center Banquet Room from 5-8 p.m. He stated that people can sign up online to attend by making a donation of $10. Donations go in part to the cost of event, with the remainder going to STEP. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:05 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Jake Spano, Mayor Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Consent Agenda Item: 4a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Approve Final Payment for Project No. 4016-1100 – 2016 MSA Street Rehabilitation –Flag Ave / Quentin Ave RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing final payment in the amount of $56,186.37 for Project 4016-1100 MSA Street Rehabilitation – Flag Avenue / Quentin Avenue, City Contract No. 92-16. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Not Applicable SUMMARY: On May 2, 2016, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $661,279.87 to Hardrives, Inc. for the 2016 MSA Project Flag Avenue/Quentin Avenue, Project 4016-1100. The project consisted of a two inch mill and overlay on Flag Avenue and Quentin Avenue, curb ramp upgrades to meet the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) on Flag Avenue, and sidewalk, curb and gutter was replaced on Flag Avenue as needed. Flag Avenue also underwent utility repairs and upgrades. Watermain valves, storm sewer, and sanitary sewer repairs was also completed on Flag Avenue. The Contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed. The final contract cost, $685,315.45, is 3.5% more than the original contract amount of $661,279.87. The cost overrun was the result of actual quantities being higher than estimated and one change order for hydrant work. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The final contract cost of the work performed by the contractor under Contract No. 92-16 has been calculated as follows: Original Contract Price $661,279.87 Change Order 1 +$ 2,714.14 Final Contract Amount $663,994.01 Actual Amount Due $685,315.45 Previous Payments -$629,129.08 Balance Due $56,186.37 This project was included in the City’s adopted 2016 Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The work was paid for using Municipal State Aid and Utility Funds. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Joseph Shamla, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Debra M. Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Approve Final Payment for Project No. 4016-1100 – 2016 MSA Street Rehabilitation – Flag Ave / Quentin Ave RESOLUTION NO. 18-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT AND ACCEPTING THE WORK ON FLAG AVENUE / QUENTIN AVENUE CITY PROJECT NO. 4016-1100 CONTRACT NO. 92-16 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1.Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated May 2, 2016, Hardrives, Inc. has satisfactorily completed Project 4016-1100 MSA Street Rehabilitation - (Flag Avenue / Quentin Avenue), as per Contract No. 92-16. 2.The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work. 3.The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost is $685,315.45. 4.The City Manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $56,186.37 on the contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 16, 2018 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Consent Agenda Item: 4b EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing staff to enter into a Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County. The agreement is for a feasibility study to consider connections across the BNSF Railroad adjacent to Highway 100 - Project No. 4018-2000. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to continue to implement the Connect the Park plan? SUMMARY: Connect the Park is the city’s 10-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) to add sidewalks, trails, and bikeways throughout the community. Two bridges were identified in the original plan to cross over the BNSF railroad adjacent to Highway 100 (See location map). The City is in the process of making significant investments to gain access to the North Cedar Lake trail from the south with the construction of the Utica Trail from 27th Street. However, the high volume and high speed freight rail line operated by BNSF is a barrier to being able to safely access areas to the north near the West End developments. Freight rail and a number of other constraints have prevented a straightforward solution. Constraints include limited public right of way, high voltage overhead electrical lines and Highway 100 access ramps. The City applied for and received a grant from Hennepin County through their bikeway cost participation policy. This grant was for a $20,000 to study the feasibility of a safe and efficient crossing of the BNSF rail line. The feasibility analysis is being called the “West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study”. The City will hire a consultant to help with the concept design and public engagement. If a project would ever come to fruition from this study, it will complement the bike and pedestrian bridge that will constructed in 2019 over the BNSF railroad at Dakota Avenue/Edgewood Avenue with the use of approximately $2.9 million of federal funding. The cost to complete this study is expected to be approximately $40,000. The City will be responsible for the additional $20,000. The intended outcome of the study would be to identify conceptual routes, provide high level cost estimates, and help with future implementation grants. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The funding provided by the city (approximately $20,000) is included in the City’s CIP for 2018. The project will be paid for using General Obligation Bonds. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Cooperative Agreement Location Map Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Engineering Project Manager Reviewed by: Joseph Shamla, Senior Engineering Project Manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study RESOLUTION NO. 18-____ RESOLUTION APPROVING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH HENNEPIN COUNTY FOR CITY PROJECT 4018-2000 WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park desires safe and efficient pedestrian and bicycle connections across the BNSF railroad adjacent to Highway 100; and WHEREAS, Hennepin County has agreed to contribute a lump sum of $20,000 for a feasibility study referred to as the “West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study; and WHEREAS, the City will be responsible for the development of the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study, and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park deems it proper and in the public interest to enter into a cooperative agreement with Hennepin County (County Project 1719) to complete feasibility study included for City Project 4018-2000. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the Mayor and the City Manager are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the City to execute and enter into a cooperative agreement with Hennepin County for City Project 4018-2000. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 16, 2018 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Agreement No. PW 27-05-17 County Project No. 1719 City of St. Louis Park County of Hennepin COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT FOR COST PARTICIPATION IN FEASABILITY STUDY THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of _______ 20�, by and between the County of Hennepin, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of St. Louis Park, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "City". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City has requested County pmiicipation in the costs to prepare a feasibility study of a bikeway and pedestrian connection across Trunk Highway 100; and WHEREAS, the above mentioned feasibility study has been identified as County Project No. 1719 and shall be hereinafter referred to as the "West End Bike and Pedestrian Cormection Study"; and WHEREAS, the City will be responsible for development of the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study; and WHEREAS, the costs incmrnd by the City to prepare the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study are eligible for participation under Hennepin County's bikeway cost participation policy; and WHEREAS, the County desires to participate in the costs to be incurred by the City to prepare the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study; and WHEREAS, it is contemplated that said work be carried out by the parties hereto under the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 162.17, Subdivision 1, and Section 471.59. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY AGREED: I The City shall be the lead agency and it or its agents shall be responsible to ensure that all work and services required for the completion of the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study are in accordance with the provisions provided for herein, as well as any and all applicable laws, regulations and guidelines. - I - City Council Meeting January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Title: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study Page 3 Agreement No. PW 27-05-17 C.P. 1719 The City or its agents shall be responsible for the collection of any and all data req uired to complete the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study. It is understood that the County will provide the City with existing pe1tinent data as may be available. All plans, designs and repmts prepared in accordance herewith shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a professional engineer, registered in the State of Minnesota, and said plans, designs and repmts shall be ceitified as required by law. II At the request of the County, the City or its agents shall furnish the County with any working copies of any plans, designs or reports at any time during the study process. The County retains the right to, at any time, review and comment on the plans, designs or reports of the City or its agents in regards to the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study proposed herein. III The City shall be responsible for the accuracy of the work of its agents and shall ensure that all necessary revisions or corrections resulting from errors and omissions on the part of the City or its agents are promptly made without additional compensation by the County. Acceptance of the work by the County shall in no way relieve the City or its agents of the responsibility for subsequent corrections of any such errors or omissions and also the clarification of any ambiguities. IV It is understood and agreed by the City that the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study proposed herein shall be completed within three years from date of agreement execution. Upon completion of the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study the City shall furnish the County with three (3) copies of the completed study. V The County will pmticipate in the costs to prepare the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study as provided herein. The County's cost participation shall be a lump sum mnount of Twenty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($20,000.00). The City understands and agrees that the County's total and only pmticipation in the costs to prepare the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study shall be $20,000.00. Upon completion of the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study the City shall notify - 2 - City Council Meeting January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Title: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study Page 4 Agreement No. PW 27-05-17 C.P. 1719 the County and submit an invoice for one hundred percent (100%) of the County's share of the costs. Upon review approval of the completed West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study by the County Highway Engineer or designated representative, the County shall reimburse the City for its share of the costs. Said invoice should include the date of the invoice, the invoice number, the name of the project manager (Mr. Robert Byers, P.E.), project name and county project number (C.P. 1719), contract number and purchase order number. Invoices and supporting documentation should be mailed to: Hennepin County Accounts Payable, P.O. Box 1388, Minneapolis, MN 55440-1388. An electronic copy of all invoices should also be submitted to Mr. Robert Byers, P.E. at robert.byers@hennepin.us. The County will within forty five ( 45) days of said invoice, deposit with the City funds totaling the amount of said invoice. VI It is understood that the monetary reimbursement to the City provided for herein is for the County's total share of the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study and that nothing herein shall be construed as a commitment by the County to participate in the construction costs of any improvements implemented as a result of the West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study. VII All records kept by the City and the County with respect to this project shall be subject to examination by the representatives of each party hereto. VIII The City agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the County, its officials, officers, agents, volunteers, and employees from any liability, claims, causes of action, judgments, damages, losses, costs or expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, resulting directly or indirectly from any act or omission of the City or said city's consultant or sub consultant, anyone directly or indirectly employed by them, and/or anyone for whose acts and/or omissions they may be liable in the performance of the services required by this contract, and against all loss by reason of the failure of the City to perform fully, in any respect, all obligations under this contract. The City's liability shall be governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 or other applicable law. IX It is agreed that each party to this Agreement or their agents shall not be responsible or liable to the other party or to any other person whomsoever for any liabilities, claims, actions or causes of - 3 - City Council Meeting January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Title: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study Page 5 Agreement No. PW 27-05-17 C.P. 1719 actions, judgments, damages, loses, fines, penalties, expenses of any kind or character arising out of or by reason of the performance of any design or construction work or part hereof by the other as provided herein; and each party further agrees to defend at its sole cost and expense any action or proceeding commenced for the purpose of asserting any claim of whatsoever character arising in connection with or by virtue of performance of its own work as provided herein. The County's and the City's liability is governed by the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The County and the City each warrant that they are able to comply with the aforementioned indemnity requirements through an insurance or self-insurance program. X It is further agreed that any and all employees of the City and all other persons engaged by said City in the performance of any work or services required or provided for herein to be performed by the City shall not be considered employees of the County, and that any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workers' Compensation Act or the Minnesota Economic Security Law on behalf of said employees while so engaged and any and all claims made by any third parties as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work or services provided to be rendered herein shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the County. XI Any alteration, variations, modifications, or waivers of provisions of this Agreement shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing as an amendment to this Agreement and signed by the parties hereto. XII The provisions of Minnesota Statutes 181.59 and of any applicable local ordinance relating to civil rights and discrimination and the Affirmative Action Policy statement of Hennepin County shall be considered a part of this Agreement as though fully set forth herein. XIII The matters set forth in the "whereas" clauses at the beginning of this Agreement are incorporated into and made a part hereof by this reference. (this space left i11te11tio11al/y bla11k) - 4 - City Council Meeting January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Title: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study Page 6 Agreement No. PW 27-05-17 C.P. 1719 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK (Seal) By: _______________ _ Mayor Date: _______________ _ And: _______________ _ Manager Date: _______________ _ COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ATTEST: By : _____________ _ Deputy/Clerk of the County B oard Date: ____________ _ APPROVED AS TO FORM: By �C...� � �ty Attorney Date: __ /_�_(3_./�/�9-____ _ APPROVED AS TO EXECUTION: B y: ___________ _ Assistant County Attorney Date: ____________ _ By: _______________ _ Chair of its County B oard Date: _______________ _ And: ----------------County Administrator Date: _______________ _ And: ----------------Assistant County Administrator, Public Works Date: _______________ _ RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL By: _____________ _ Director, Transportation Project Delivery Department Date : ---------------- - 5 - City Council Meeting January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Title: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study Page 7 ¬«100 OLD CEDAR L A K E R D CEDAR LAKE R D C E D A R L A K E R D GAMBLE DR QUENTINAVESPARK PLACE BLVD25 1/2 ST W PARKDALE D R WEBSTERAVE SCE DA RW OO D R DQUENTINAVES UTICAAVESHILLLNSWESTRIDGE LNUTICAAVESDUKE DRWESTENDBLVDWESTSIDE DR NATCHEZAVESOTTAWAAVESPRINCETONAVESPARKWOODS RDSB HWY100 S TO PARKD DRNBHWY100STOEBI3942 3 R D S T W 0 500 1,000250 Feet ´ Study Area for Hennepin County Co-Operative Agreement Legend Proposed Bridges 2019 Bikeways 2022 Bikeways Study Bikeways Study Sidewalks 2018 Trails 2020 Trails Existing Sidewalks Existing Trails City Council Meeting January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4b) Title: Cooperative Agreement with Hennepin County – West End Bike and Pedestrian Connection Study Page 8 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Consent Agenda Item: 4c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Traffic Study 688: Temporary Permit Parking at 4245 Toledo Avenue RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing installation of temporary parking restrictions in front of 4245 Toledo Avenue. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The restriction is allowed per the City’s established regulatory authority and policy. SUMMARY: On January 8, 2018, staff received a request from a resident to restrict on-street parking in front their residence at 4245 Toledo Avenue. The resident has a medical situation that requires curbside access to vehicles in front of their property. The City’s Traffic Policy and past practice allows for permit parking in these types of situations. It has been the City’s practice to use permit parking, which can then be removed when the individual needing the access no longer resides there or no longer needs the access. Staff considers the request to be valid and supports the installation of temporary permit parking for disabled access at 4245 Toledo Avenue for the next six (6) months. This recommendation is based on the following: 1. A resident of the household has demonstrated a medical need for such reserved parking by providing a doctor’s note. 2.Conflicting parking tendencies with neighbors will be eliminated. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will come out of the general operating budget. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Map Prepared by: Ben Manibog, Transportation Engineer Reviewed by: Jack Sullivan, Senior Engineering Project Manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Traffic Study 688: Temporary Permit Parking at 4245 Toledo Avenue RESOLUTION NO. 18-___ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING INSTALLATION OF TEMPORARY PERMIT PARKING IN FRONT OF 4245 TOLEDO AVENUE TRAFFIC STUDY NO. 688 BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota that it is in the best interest of the City to establish a parking restriction based upon permit issuance in front of 4245 Toledo Avenue. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that parking shall not be permitted at any time unless the vehicle prominently displays a City-issued parking permit. Emergency vehicles, governmental vehicles, and commercial vehicles parked at curbside while work is conducted are exempt from these restrictions. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the parking restriction enacted herein shall remain in effect for a period of six (6) months from the date of this resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that after the period of six (6) months, the permit applicant may reapply for temporary permit parking for another period of six (6) months. If the applicant does not reapply for temporary permit parking or if their re-application is not approved, the related parking signage will be removed and the corresponding resolution will be rescinded. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that the Engineering Director is hereby authorized to install the following controls. 1. Permit parking at 4245 Toledo Avenue. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 16, 2018 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk MORNINGSIDE RD SALEM AVE STOLEDO AVE SBROOK AVE SCOOLIDGE AVE S4242 4256 4305 5220 4300 4301 4300 5210 5200 4312 4308 4304 4309 4305 4313 4312 4304 4308 4249 4257 4245 4248 4301 4309 4305 422442254224 4228 42284229 4232 42324233 423642364237 4240 4241 4244 4248 4252 4313 4261 4257 4253 4249 4245 4241 4237 4233 4229 4225 4301 4313 4220422142204221 4317 4231 4243 4316 4317 5124 4316 4249 4237 4225 4321 4221 0 100 20050 Feet ´ TS 688 - Extents Map - 1/16/18 Legend Proposed Permit Parking Restrictions Property Lines City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4c) Title: Traffic Study 688: Temporary Permit Parking at 4245 Toledo Avenue Page 3 Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Consent Agenda Item: 4d EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 06-028-24-41-0041. POLICY CONSIDERATION: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by the City Council. SUMMARY: Christopher Stropes and Cindy Somers-Stropes, owners of the single family residence at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South, have requested the City to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the City’s special assessment policy. The City requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the City Council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by City staff. The property owners hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the City’s special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the City to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $4,500. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: The City has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Jay Hall , Utility Superintendent Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent Beth Simonsen, Accountant Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer Cynthia S. Walsh, Director of Operations and Recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Special Assessment – Sewer Service Line Repair at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South RESOLUTION NO. 18-____ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE REPAIR OF THE SEWER SERVICE LINE AT 3522 GLENHURST AVENUE SOUTH P.I.D. 06-028-24-41-0041 WHEREAS, the Property Owners at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South, have petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family residence located at 3522 Glenhurst Avenue South; and WHEREAS, the Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the Property Owners requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Public Works Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $4,500. 4. The Property Owners have agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The Property Owners have agreed to pay the City for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 4.00%. 6. The Property Owners have executed an agreement with the City and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 16, 2018 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Consent Agenda Item: 4e EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: Retirement Recognition Resolution for Public Service Worker Randy Lawrence RECOMMENDED ACTION: Motion to Adopt Resolution to recognize Public Service Worker Randy Lawrence for more than 37 years of service. POLICY CONSIDERATION: None at this time. SUMMARY: City policy states that employees who retire or resign in good standing with over 20 years of service will be presented with a resolution from the Mayor, City Manager and City Council. Randy has chosen not to be honored with a presentation and will not be attending the Council meeting. This consent item will officially adopt the resolution that honors Randy for his years of service. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Resolution Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR Manager Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Retirement Recognition Resolution for Public Service Worker Randy Lawrence RESOLUTION NO. 18-____ RECOGNIZING THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF AND EXPRESSING APPRECIATION TO PUBLIC SERVICE WORKER RANDY LAWRENCE WHEREAS, Randy Lawrence began his employment with the City of St. Louis Park over 37 years ago on November 3, 1980; and WHEREAS, Randy was an extremely diligent employee who thought safety first, took pride in his work, led by example, and trained employees to follow in his footsteps to provide the highest quality of service to the residents while working within the street, forestry, and traffic departments; and WHEREAS, while working in the forestry department, Randy removed thousands of trees and trimmed many more during the Dutch Elm epidemic, numerous storms, and other tree removal situations, and WHEREAS, Randy can safely say that he planted many more trees and shrubs in the boulevards and parks throughout the city than he removed during his 37 years of employment; and WHEREAS, Randy has plowed over 183 feet of snow, including 29 inches in the Halloween Storm of 1991, and is looking forward to enjoying the snow from his living room from now on; and WHEREAS, Randy will try to balance time between fishing and family while dreaming about the perfect lake place to buy; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, by this resolution and public record, would like to thank Randy Lawrence for his great contributions and more than 37 years of dedicated service to the City of St. Louis Park and wish him the best in his retirement. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council January 16, 2018 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Meeting: City Council Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Public Hearing Agenda Item: 6a EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions RECOMMENDED ACTION: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public hearing. Motion to approve the first reading of an Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Sec. 12.04 related to Campaign Finance Contributions. A unanimous vote of all 7 councilmembers is required for approval. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council support the proposed Charter amendment related to campaign finance contributions? SUMMARY: In 2017 a discrepancy was found between the contents of Sec. 12.04 of the Home Rule Charter and the campaign contribution limits set forth in Minnesota Statute Section 211A.12. The City’s Home Rule Charter limits campaign contributions to $250 per year and State Statute limits campaign contributions to $600 in an election year. The city attorney provided the opinion that, in this instance, the statute governs and a candidate may accept contributions up to $600 in an election year. The opinion was based on the fact that when adopting Minn. Stat. 211A.12 the Legislature specifically referenced Minn. Stat. 410.21 and stated that the provisions of Minn. Stat. 211A.12 supersede any home rule charter. Therefore, the contribution limits found in Minn. Stat. 211A.12 govern. The city council subsequently adopted Resolution No. 17-153 which asked the Charter Commission to study and make a recommendation as to whether the City’s Charter should be amended related to campaign finance contribution limits. The Charter Commission met on October 24, 2017 and December 6, 2017 and approved a recommendation to amend Section 12.04 of the Home Rule Charter by adding language that referenced the campaign contribution limits set forth in Minnesota Statute 211A.12. Because this statute specifically supersedes any conflicting provisions in a Home Rule Charter, the Commission felt it best to eliminate the discrepancy and to simply reference the limits set forth in statute to avoid any conflicts that may arise from future amendments at the state level. The notice of public hearing, including the text of the proposed amendment, was published on December 28, 2017 in the Sun Sailor. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. VISION CONSIDERATION: Not applicable. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Draft Ordinance Charter Commission Meeting Minutes of December 6, 2017 Minnesota Statutes Section 211A.12 Prepared by: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 2 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions DISCUSSION What is the process to amend the City Charter? In the past, amendments to the City Charter have been enacted by ordinance in accordance with the procedure outlined in M.S. § 410.12, Subd. 7. Amendment by Ordinance. “Upon recommendation of the charter commission the city council may enact a charter amendment by ordinance. Within one month of receiving a recommendation to amend the charter by ordinance, the city must publish notice of a public hearing on the proposal and the notice must contain the text of the proposed amendment. The city council must hold the public hearing on the proposed charter amendment at least two weeks but not more than one month after the notice is published. Within one month of the public hearing, the city council must vote on the proposed charter amendment ordinance. The ordinance is enacted if it receives an affirmative vote of all members of the city council and is approved by the mayor and published as in the case of other ordinances. An ordinance amending a city charter shall not become effective until 90 days after passage and publication or at such later date as is fixed in the ordinance. Within 60 days after passage and publication of such an ordinance, a petition requesting a referendum on the ordinance may be filed with the city clerk. The petition must be signed by registered voters equal in number to at least five percent of the registered voters in the city or 2,000, whichever is less. If the requisite petition is filed within the prescribed period, the ordinance shall not become effective until it is approved by the voters as in the case of charter amendments submitted by the charter commission, the council, or by petition of the voters, except that the council may submit the ordinance at any general or special election held at least 60 days after submission of the petition, or it may reconsider its action in adopting the ordinance. As far as practicable the requirements of subdivisions 1 to 3 apply to petitions submitted under this section, to an ordinance amending a charter, and to the filing of such ordinance when approved by the voters.” Can the City Council make changes to the proposed Charter amendment? Because statute requires that the notice of the public hearing include the proposed text of the amendment, the council must vote on the amendment as presented. What is the timeline for the proposed amendment to take effect? • 12/28 Notice of Hearing Published • 1/16 Public Hearing/First Reading of Ordinance • 2/5 Second Reading of Ordinance • 2/15 Ordinance Published • 4/16 60-day deadline (for petition) • 5/16 Ordinance Effective Date (90 days after Passage and Publication) Charter Commission Recommendation On December 6, 2017 the Charter Commission made the following recommendation: • Amend Sec. 12.04 of the City Charter to reference the language and campaign contribution limits set forth in Minnesota Statutes Section 211A.12. City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 3 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions ORDINANCE NO. XXXX-18 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LOUIS PARK HOME RULE CHARTER SECTION 12.04 REGARDING CAMPAIGN FINANCE CONTRIBUTIONS PREAMBLE WHEREAS, pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 410.12, Subd. 7 the Charter Commission has recommended to the City Council that the Charter be amended as provided herein; and WHEREAS, Minn. Stat. § 410.12, Subd. 7 provides that upon recommendation of the Charter Commission the City Council may enact a Charter Amendment by ordinance. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA DOES ORDAIN: SECTION 1. The St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter Section 12.04 is hereby amended by deleting stricken language and adding underscored language: Section 12.04. Contributions. (1)A candidate or personal campaign committee may not accept aggregate contributions made by an individual or committee in excess of two hundred fifty dollars ($250.00) in any year the contribution limits provided for in Minnesota Statutes Section 211A.12. (2)Every person who receives a contribution or loan for a personal campaign committee shall, on demand of the treasurer, and in any event, within fourteen (14) days after receipt of the contribution or loan, furnish the treasurer with the name and, if known, address of the contributor or lender, the amount contributed or loaned and the date of receipt. (3)No anonymous contributions in excess of twenty dollars ($20.00) or any anonymous contributions aggregating in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) in any calendar year shall be retained by the personal campaign committee, but shall be forwarded to the City Clerk and deposited to the general fund of the City. This subdivision shall not apply to anonymous contributions aggregating in excess of one hundred dollars ($100.00) arising from fund raising sales, where in consideration of a contribution or contributions, a person receives any tangible goods whose value has a reasonable relationship to the contribution. (4)All contributions of fifty dollars ($50.00) or more shall be made by check, bank draft or money order. (5)All monetary contributions received by or on behalf of any candidate or personal campaign committee shall be deposited within fourteen (14) days after receipt in an account designated “campaign fund of (name of personal campaign committee).” City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Page 4 Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions SECTION 2. This Ordinance shall take effect ninety days after its publication. Date of Publication Notice of Public Hearing December 28, 2017 Public Hearing and First Reading January 16, 2018 Second Reading February 5, 2018 Date of Publication of adopted Ordinance February 15, 2018 Date Ordinance takes effect May 16, 2018 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 5, 2018 Thomas K. Harmening, City Manager Jake Spano, Mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, City Clerk Soren Mattick, City Attorney OFFICIAL MINUTES CHARTER COMMISSION MEETING ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA December 6, 2017 5:30 p.m. – Community Room, City Hall 1. Call to Order Chair Maaske called the meeting to order at 5:35 p.m. 2. Roll Call and Attendance Members Present: Maren Anderson, JC Beckstrand, Jim Brimeyer, Gary Carlson, Jim de Lambert, Terry Dwyer, David Dyer, Matthew Flory, Ken Gothberg, Sara Maaske, Erin Smith, and Henry Solmer. Members Absent: Lynne Carper, Ron Jarvi, Jr., Andrew Rose Others Present: Nancy Deno (Deputy City Manager/HR Director), Soren Mattick (City Attorney) 3. Approval of Minutes It was moved by Commissioner Beckstrand, seconded by Commissioner Flory, to approve the minutes of October 24. The motion passed 12-0. 4. Old Business a. Proposed Charter Amendments related to Ranked Choice Voting and Campaign Finance Contribution Limits Chair Maaske asked the commission if they would first discuss campaign finance contribution limits then ranked choice voting. Commission was in consensus of this order of discussion. Chair Maaske asked Attorney Mattick to provide information on the finance contribution limits. Mr. Mattick stated that the limits in the charter could change to reflect limits allowed in Minnesota Statutes. If limits change again, this language would allow for a change with no other action or amendments needed. There was discussion by commission. It was moved by Commissioner Brimeyer and seconded by Commissioner Carlson to recommend to the city council to amend the ordinance section 12.04 Contributions as presented by the City Attorney Mattick. Motion passed 12-0. Chair Maaske asked City Attorney Mattick to provide information on the request from council on ranked choice voting and the draft of possible charter amendments. He stated the council adopted a resolution that requested the charter commission study and make a recommendation to the city council as to whether the city’s charter should be amended to provide for the use of RCV. If the charter commission moved ahead, the language is brief and an example has been provided. The change would be adding 4.08 Voting Method. With language the voters elect the city’s elected officer by single transferable voting (also known as “ranked-choice voting” or “instant-runoff voting”). The City Council must provide by ordinance the method of counting the votes and breaking a tie. He stated the question of the charter commission is at the policy level, and the City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions Page 5 Charter Commission Minutes -2- October 24, 2017 method of how the votes are counted and technical matters would be developed and approved by the City Council if this is the method that is put in place. Chair Maaske stated at the last meeting the commission discussed public process. She asked that the commission discuss public process. Commissioner Gothberg stated that discussion on a public process would assume that we are interested in possibly moving in the direction to change the charter and he stated he is not certain that is the direction of the commission. He stated he would like to hear an update from each member to determine what commissioners have to say since the last meeting. Commissioner Beckstrand asked Attorney Mattick about the term single transferable voting. Attorney Mattick stated this is the language used by Minneapolis to define this change in voting. In the past it was also called instant runoff voting and there also has been a legal question of use of the term ranked choice voting. Commissioner Beckstrand stated it may be confusing to use this term. Attorney Mattick stated he would do further research on this, and that language and terms used must be able to withstand a constitutional challenge. There was discussion about the overall need for education and helping people understand. Commissioner Maaske asked to hear from each commissioner. Commissioner Solmer stated he is interested in making the change to allow ranked choice voting. He discussed the Ward 1 recent election. He also stated he watched Minneapolis and they were able to get their counts completed in one day. Commissioner Smith stated she is in the same place as the last discussion and would like to move forward with ranked choice voting. Commissioner Gothberg stated he cannot support ranked choice voting and does not see any problem to be solved. He stated there is no defined need and feels it encourages deal-making. There are additional financial resources needed to make this happen. It is estimated an additional one hundred fifteen to one hundred forty five thousand dollars is needed and these funds could be used to better serve residents or for real problems. He talked about how RCV does not guarantee 50%, how to handle a tie and factors against non-traditional or spoilers. He stated he received two calls to support RCV and when he asked them why St. Louis Park he was told it is for better state and federal results, and they were told to go back to the cities. He stated this method is not allowed for federal or state elections. He stated that if the charter commission determines it should move ahead, this should go on the ballot and let the people make the determination. Commissioner Flory stated he is open, not an opponent, and is a skeptic. He questioned what problem RCV is trying to solve, and said he is not sure of a problem. He would like it on a ballot, to have a public process, to discuss this as “measure twice, cut once” before any decision is made. He is not convinced any change is needed and also that Minneapolis elected Mayor Sayles Belton in the past without RCV. Commissioner de Lambert stated he is in favor to pursue. City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions Page 6 Charter Commission Minutes -3- October 24, 2017 Commissioner Carlson stated he has not changed his opinion since the last meeting. He discussed how he watched the administration of Minneapolis and St. Paul and this second time was much smoother. He talked to candidates and they told him it was more positive campaigning. He does not see a need for a referendum because there is a reverse referendum process if needed. Commissioner Brimeyer stated he hasn’t changed his mind since the last meeting but he has changed his thinking. He met with a group of individuals, one who owns assisted living in the city and was told the seniors in the building are confused about voting with the current method and did not think this change is in their best interest. He was told that it is important that people are able to understand and use a voting system and RCV would be too confusing. Commissioner Brimeyer stated he is interested in holding listening sessions and if we move ahead, extensive educational processes. He suggested the League of Women voters could and should assist with both. He suggested that it will take time to make the decision and various options of informational panels that would be put in place for education and listening sessions. He wanted to make sure to reach out to all populations in the city and people who do not traditionally attend public meetings and get their input. He stated he disagrees with concerns on the financial cost because if there was a referendum it would be costly to run that process. He does not agree that this should go on a ballot. Commissioner Beckstrand stated he is in the middle, he is not convinced and wonders what problem is trying to be solved. He stated he needs more evidence, more than anecdotes; he has not seen a study. He stated he did not know of the media event early in the week and wonders why he was not contacted by those hosting the event and why the commission was excluded, not part of the process. Commissioner Beckstrand stated he wants more data that would allow him to make a more informed decision. He is in favor of a public process with listening sessions and allowing others to communicate and ask questions. Commissioner Anderson stated she is on the fence. She is open. She has heard that ranked choice voting is difficult for the public and has talked to people in Minneapolis. Commissioner Anderson has concerns of the costs and if funds are used for this it takes the funding away from other things that are needed. Commissioner Dwyer stated he is in favor of ranked choice voting and has observed Minneapolis and St. Paul. He stated we are not solving a current problem today and this may help solve future issues. He agreed that there is not a lot of data at this time. He stated that we have created plurality by eliminating the primary. Commissioner Dyer stated he would be in favor of moving ahead with rank ed choice voting. He stated that this should be done by a vote of the people since it is about the vote of the people. Chair Maaske stated she is on the fence. She stated she is in favor of more voter turnout and to widen the field. Chair Maaske stated she is not convinced that RCV makes it easier to choose to run for office as a new candidate. She fails to see the problem and wants to hear from residents. Chair Maaske talked about how it may be good to explore some other options such as our current ward and at-large system, that there may be other different ways to study. Chair Maaske stated that no matter where we head, she would like to have a very robust public process. She continued to discuss various types of public process, locations, method of listening sessions, education and outreach possibilities. City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions Page 7 Charter Commission Minutes -4- October 24, 2017 Commissioner Brimeyer talked about funds, no need for referendum. Commissioner Gothberg stated a good public process is needed and ballot is a method that includes a detailed public process requiring education and communication. He stated it is important to get other populations involved and this could easily be put on the next ballot. Commissioner Flory talked about other possible changes with voting and possibly exploring at- large and wards. He talked about education sessions and getting more people out to vote. There was more discussion in general about at-large and ward seats. The commission discussed public process for the charter commission. Questions were about what the commission may want for a public process, what it would look like, where, how many, how to reach people, how to gather information, neighborhoods. Questions came up on how to inform, what to inform, how to get others to provide information on the current process, what is the purpose, how to educate, how to reach people of color to run, how public process in Vision was conducted, listening sessions by ward, how long are the sessions, how long would this process take. There was comment on possible large education session to be recorded then determine how to hold listening sessions and locations. Commission discussed having the charter commission executive committee form a small group to study and draft a public process for review by the full commission. The commission talked about the small work group and having 4 or 5 members. Motion was made by Commissioner Beckstrand and seconded by Commissioner Gothberg to have the executive members work as a small group with 2 additional members to develop a proposed model for public process and report back to the commission on their recommendation at their next regular meeting. Members would be Chair Maaske, Vice Chair Dyer, Secretary Dwyer, Commissioner Beckstrand and Commissioner Smith. Motion approved 12 - 0 5. New Business 6. Future Meetings The Charter Commission scheduled their next meeting for January 10th at 5:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in City Hall. 7. Communications - None 8. Adjournment It was moved by Commissioner Carlson, seconded by Commissioner Anderson, to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed 12-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions Page 8 211A.12 CONTRIBUTION LIMITS. A candidate or a candidate's committee may not accept aggregate contributions made or delivered by an individual or committee in excess of $600 in an election year for the office sought and $250 in other years; except that a candidate or a candidate's committee for an office whose territory has a population over 100,000 may not accept aggregate contributions made or delivered by an individual or committee in excess of $1,000 in an election year for the office sought and $250 in other years. The following deliveries are not subject to the bundling limitation in this section: (1)deliveryofcontributionscollectedbyamemberofthecandidate'scommittee,suchasablockworker or a volunteer who hosts a fund-raising event, to the committee's treasurer; and (2) a delivery made by an individual on behalf of the individual's spouse. Notwithstanding sections 211A.02, subdivision 3, and 410.21, this section supersedes any home rule charter. History:1993 c 318 art 2 s 46; 1997 c 224 s 1; 2014 c 265 s 2 Copyright © 2017 by the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved. 211A.12MINNESOTA STATUTES 20171 City Council Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 6a) Title: First Reading of Ordinance Amending Home Rule Charter Related to Campaign Finance Contributions Page 9 Meeting: Special Study Session Meeting Date: January 16, 2018 Discussion Item: 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TITLE: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update RECOMMENDED ACTION: Staff desires to provide an overview of the proposed 2018 Pavement Management Project and receive feedback from the Council. POLICY CONSIDERATION: Does the City Council wish to pursue the installation of sidewalks, reduce impervious surface, and implement traffic management measures recommended as a part of our annual Pavement Management Project? SUMMARY: The Engineering Department has been working on the design of the 2018 Pavement Management Project. This annual project rehabilitates several miles of local residential streets. This year, the streets to be rehabilitated are located in Pavement Management Area 6, (the Elmwood, Brooklawns and Brookside Neighborhoods). Street rehabilitation work consists of removing and replacing the existing bituminous pavement and replacing portions of concrete curb and gutter as needed. Other work includes sewer repairs and watermain replacement. There are no official Connect the Park plan sidewalk segments in this project; however, from a neighborhood livability standpoint, past Council policy direction has been to evaluate the sidewalk system as a part of all transportation projects and identify gaps in the network. As a part of project development, the sidewalk network adjacent to the streets were reviewed and there are a number of sidewalk gap segments under consideration as a part of this project. FINANCIAL OR BUDGET CONSIDERATION: This project is included in the City’s 2018 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) and will be paid for using, franchise fees, utility funds, and General Obligation Bonds. A construction cost estimate for the entire Pavement Management Project is being worked on and will be provided at the February Public Hearing. VISION CONSIDERATION: St. Louis Park is committed to being a connected and engaged community. SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS: Discussion Attachment #1: Elmwood & Brooklawns Sidewalk Segment Matrix Attachment #2: Elmwood & Brooklawns Project Scope, Proposed Street Widths, and Sidewalk & Traffic Control Recommendations Attachment #3: Brookside Project Scope, Proposed Street Widths, & Sidewalk Recommendations Attachment #4: Resident Feedback- General Project Support Attachment #5: Resident Feedback- Sidewalks Attachment #6: Resident Feedback- General Traffic Concerns Attachment #7: Resident Feedback- Aldersgate Church Driveway Closure Attachment #8: Resident Feedback- Convert Oxford Street to a Two-way Street Attachment #9: Resident Feedback- Street Widths Attachment #10: Resident Feedback- Traffic Circles Attachment #11: Traffic Study Phase I – Conducted by Spack Consulting Attachment #12: Traffic Study Phase II – Conducted by Spack Consulting Attachment #13: Traffic Study Phase II – Attachments A-F Attachment #14: Proposed Parking Restrictions Map for 36th Street and Brunswick Avenue Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, Project Engineer & Ben Manibog, Transportation Engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, Engineering Director Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update DISCUSSION BACKGROUND: The City’s Pavement Management Program (PMP) proactively addresses the condition of the residential streets within the city. Many of these streets are now approaching 50 years of age or more. The city’s residential streets are still in relatively good condition due to the fact that the streets were built well, are generally situated on good soils, utilize curb & gutter for drainage and have been well maintained. City maintenance crews have continually worked to keep residential streets in good condition using maintenance strategies such as patching, crack filling and seal coating. However, as pavements age, more aggressive maintenance strategies are needed to prolong their life. The PMP was developed in 2003 to extend pavement life and enhance system-wide performance in a cost-effective and efficient way by providing the right pavement strategy at the right time. Using pavement management software, staff documents street condition ratings and monitors their performance. Staff then evaluates the condition of streets and selects cost-effective treatments to extend pavement life. In addition to the needed street and utility work, the City council has provided staff direction to look at all aspects of neighborhood livability and “Living Streets” considerations as a part of our transportation projects. As a part of project development staff has reviewed the sidewalk network, storm water runoff, traffic management and aesthetics. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This year’s project will be performed in Area 6 of the City’s eight pavement management areas. It includes work in the Elmwood, Brooklawns and Brookside Neighborhoods. The attached maps identify the streets in Area 6 that have been selected for rehabilitation and outlines the various work to be performed on each street. Selection was based on street condition and field evaluations to determine the condition of the pavement, curb and gutter, and the city’s underground utilities. A team of staff members from Streets, Utilities, and Engineering worked together to select streets and to recommend appropriate rehabilitation techniques for inclusion in this year’s Pavement Management Project. Many of the street segments are proposed to include additional infrastructure upgrades such as watermain and water service replacement, storm sewer construction, and the installation of sidewalk. Other streets will have random curb and gutter replacement and new asphalt surfacing. Watermain and Water Service Replacement The watermain on these streets are approximately 60-75 years old and experiencing deterioration. The work will consist of the replacement of the watermain and the water services to the curb stop. The watermain is approximately 7.5 feet deep and located under or near one of the curb lines, running parallel to the street. In order to replace the watermain on a street segment, the asphalt pavement is removed and the street is open cut to the depth of the watermain. In most cases the curb line closest to the watermain needs to be removed prior to the watermain replacement, otherwise the curb will fall in to the watermain trench. The removal of the entire curb line on one side of the street gives the city an opportunity to modify the width of the roadway. There is more information on the proposed modifications to the street widths later in this report. The water services connect to the watermain and run to the curb stop and then to the house. The curb stop is located between the curb and gutter and the right of way line. The City owns the water service between the water main and the curb stop while the property owner owns the water service between the curb stop and the house. Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update As a part of this project, the water service is proposed to be replaced between the watermain and the city owned curb stop. The water service is also approximately 7.5 feet deep and must be open cut to replace. Replacing the water services has significant impacts on existing trees, landscaping, sidewalks, driveways, retaining walls, etc. Street Widths This is the third year that the City has taken the opportunity to right-size our streets as a part of the Pavement Management Project. Doing so is consistent with the Living Streets policy the Council has been considering. As noted previously, as a part of the Project we are replacing the watermain on a number of the streets in the neighborhood. This work requires the removal of all of the curb on one side of the road. In areas where we are removing all of the curb on one side of the road, it provides us an opportunity to narrow the street. Staff recommends narrowing streets for the following reasons: 1. A wider grass boulevard provides more space to plant trees. 2. Traffic calming- narrower streets can reduce vehicle speeds. 3. Reduction in directly connected impervious- less street pavement means less runoff going into our lakes, wetlands and Minnehaha Creek. 4. Less pavement reduces solar generated heat. 5. By narrowing the streets pedestrians have a shorter crossing distance at intersections. 6. Cost- narrower streets reduces the cost of initial construction and future maintenance (sealcoating, sweeping, salt application, snow plowing, etc.) 7. It is consistent with past policy direction given by the Council and is in alignment with the Living Streets policy being reviewed by the Environment & Sustainability Commission, City Council, and staff. The Police and Fire Departments have reviewed our street width standards and they do not have a concern about a 28 foot wide road with parking on both sides. For streets with widths less than 28 feet, staff recommends limiting parking to one side of the street. A graphic representing staff’s street width recommendations is attached. Watermain is being replaced on the following street segments. What follows is staff’s recommendations for street width modifications. Street Segment Existing (ft.) Proposed (ft.) Colorado Avenue (Goodrich Avenue to 37th Street) 30 28 Brunswick Avenue (Excelsior Boulevard to 37th Street) 30 28 Xenwood Avenue (Excelsior Boulevard to 39th Street) 30 28 37th Street (Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue) 30 28 Oxford Street (Dakota Avenue to Alabama Avenue) 30 28 39th Street (dead end to Alabama Avenue) 30 28 39th Street (Alabama Avenue to Webster Avenue) 30 26 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 4 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update Watermain is being replaced on the following street segments. Staff does not recommend changing the street width on these street segments. Street Segment Existing (ft.) Proposed (ft.) Dakota Avenue (Oxford Street to 37th Street) 26 26 37th Street (Dakota Avenue to Colorado Avenue) 20 20 Oxford Street (Alabama Avenue to Wooddale Avenue) 30 30 Vernon Avenue (city limits to 41st Street) 26 26 The following streets do not have watermain replacement but are recommended to be narrowed for proposed sidewalk installation. Street Segment Existing (ft.) Proposed (ft.) Zarthan Avenue (39th street to Center Park) 30 25 The following streets do not have watermain replacement. Staff recommends that these streets stay at their current width. Street Segment Existing (ft.) Proposed (ft.) Brunswick Ave/36th Street (37th Street to Alabama Ave) 30 30 Zarthan Avenue (Center Park to Oxford Street) 30 30 Xenwood Avenue (39th Street to dead end) 30 30 Wooddale Avenue (dead end to Wooddale Avenue) 40 40 37th Street (Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue) 28 28 Goodrich Avenue (Alabama Avenue to Yosemite Avenue) 40 40 Cambridge Street (Zarthan Avenue to Wooddale Avenue) 30 30 41st Street (Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue) 34.5 34.5 Parking Restrictions A street width of 28 feet from face of curb to face of curb is adequate to allow parking on two sides of the streets. Street widths of less than 28 feet are typically signed as parking on one side only. Staff worked closely with Operations and Recreation, Police, and Fire Departments to understand appropriate street widths for efficient snow removal and safe travel for emergency response vehicles. The following parking restrictions are proposed: Street Segment 39th Street (Alabama Avenue to Webster Avenue) No Parking- South Side Zarthan Avenue (39th Street to Center Park) No Parking- West Side 36th Street (Alabama Avenue to Brunswick Avenue) No Parking – South Side No Parking – North Side except excluding area across from curbed island Brunswick Avenue (36th Street to 37th Street) No Parking – East Side at the driveway access No Parking – West Side at the driveway access Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 5 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update Storm Sewer Staff has identified opportunities to install storm water best management practices (BMPs) in order to reduce volume and improve storm water quality. These improvements will be installed as a part of the project. This neighborhood drains to the basin in Bass Lake Preserve. One of the City’s goals for the Bass Lake Preserve is to reduce the volume of water going to the basin. Street Trees The City Forester has completed a tree inventory in the project area. This inventory reviewed the size, species, health, and condition of all of the trees within the project limits. As a part of the design, staff worked to preserve existing boulevard trees to the maximum extent possible. There are a number of trees that are being recommended for removal because of health, watermain construction or sidewalk construction. Tree replacement will be completed based on the City’s tree ordinance. Sidewalks As a part of the project development, staff reviewed the neighborhood sidewalk network. 3.29 miles of sidewalk gaps were identified. For purposes of discussion, a “gap” is considered a section of sidewalk that is missing on a continuous street block. The gap segments were broken down block by block and evaluated for construction costs, impacts, and network connectivity. There are 49 different segments that were evaluated. The construction of all sidewalk segments that were reviewed is feasible, however, based on our review, Staff is recommending 19 segments or 1.13 miles of sidewalks and trails be built as a part of this project. The remaining sidewalks are not recommended to be constructed at this time. These segments, if approved, would be constructed at no cost to the property owners and the City would be responsible for future repairs to defective sidewalk panels. However, these sidewalk segments would follow the appropriate sidewalk designation Neighborhood or Community. Neighborhood sidewalks are the property owner’s responsibility for snow removal; Community sidewalks are the City’s responsibility. Staff Sidewalk Recommendations: Attached to this report, staff has provided individual evaluation sheets for each of the 49 sidewalk segments. Comments received from the public meetings and other communication from property owners along with details on each segment have been added to the individual segment pages. Each sidewalk segment is unique and requires its own set of design solutions. Staff used the following criteria to develop our recommendations. Staff recommendations are context sensitive; no one criteria ranked higher than others, rather it was an evaluation of numerous factors. • Traffic volumes o Volumes under 150 vehicles a day = Look at other criteria factors o Volumes from 150 vehicles a day and greater = Sidewalk recommended on at least 1 side of the street • Existing sidewalk percentage versus proposed sidewalk percentage o If proposed sidewalk is less than 25% = Recommend sidewalk if no major impacts o If proposed sidewalk is greater than 25% = Look at other criteria factors. • Street widths • Connectivity to sidewalk network and destinations o How does the sidewalk fit into the overall network of sidewalks and trails? Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 6 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update o Is this sidewalk identified in the Active Living Sidewalk and Trail Plan? o Does the sidewalk provide a direct connection to a park, shopping center, school, etc.? • Impacts (Trees, retaining walls, driveways, etc.) • Right of way width • Cost The table below is a summary of all of the gap sidewalks evaluated for this project along with staff recommendations for construction in 2018. The bolded segments are sidewalks that staff recommends for construction at this time. Number Description Build in 2018? 1 Brookview Drive- Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue (South Side) No 2 Brookview Drive- Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue (North Side) No 3 Brookview Drive- Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue (South Side) No 4 Brookview Drive- Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue (North Side) No 5 Brunswick Avenue- Excelsior Boulevard to Brookview Drive (West Side) No 6 Brunswick Avenue- Excelsior Boulevard to Brookview Drive (East Side) Yes 7 Brunswick Avenue- Brookview Drive to RR Tracks (West Side) No 8 Brunswick Avenue- Brookview Drive to RR Tracks (East Side) No 9 Brunswick Avenue- RR Tracks to Cambridge Street (West Side) No 10 Brunswick Avenue- RR Tracks to Cambridge Street (East Side) No 11 Brunswick Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) Yes 12 Brunswick Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (East Side) Yes 13 Brunswick Avenue- Oxford Street to 37th Street (East Side) Yes 14 Brunswick Avenue/36th Street- 37th Street to Alabama Avenue (East/South Side) Yes 15 Dakota Avenue- Oxford Street to 37th Street (East Side) Yes 16 Colorado Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (East Side) No 17 Colorado Avenue- Oxford Street to 37th Street (East Side) No 18 Oxford Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue (South Side) Yes 19 Goodrich Avenue- Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue (South Side) Yes 20 Goodrich Avenue- Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale Avenue (South Side) Yes 21 Wooddale Avenue- Dead End to Cambridge Street (West Side) No 22 Wooddale Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) No 23 Yosemite Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street (West Side) No 24 Yosemite Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) No 25 Zarthan Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street (West Side) No 26 Zarthan Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street (East Side) Yes 27 Zarthan Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) No Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 7 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update 28 Zarthan Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (East Side) Yes 29 Zarthan Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (West Side) No 30 Zarthan Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (East Side) Yes 31 Cambridge Street- Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue (South Side) No 32 Cambridge Street- Alabama Avenue to Park Driveway (South Side) Yes 33 Cambridge Street- Park Driveway to Zarthan Avenue (South Side) No 34 Cambridge Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (South Side) Yes 35 Cambridge Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (North Side) No 36 Cambridge Street- Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale Avenue (South Side) No 37 39th Street- Dead End to Alabama Avenue (South Side) No 38 39th Street- Dead End to Alabama Avenue (North Side) No 39 39th Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue (South Side) Yes 40 39th Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue (North Side) Yes 41 39th Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (South Side) Yes 42 39th Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (North Side) No 43 39th Street- Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue (South Side) Yes 44 39th Street- Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue (North Side) No 45 39th Street- Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue (South Side) Yes 46 39th Street- Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue (North Side) No 47 42nd Street- Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue (South Side) No 48 42nd Street- Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue (North Side) No 49 Vermont Street- Yosemite Avenue to Vernon Avenue (South Side) No Traffic Control In February, during the planning phase of the project, staff held a meeting to identify resident’s concerns regarding mobility in and out of the neighborhood. The comments received from the meeting were used to determine the scope of a traffic management study. The study collected data to provide potential alternatives to the current traffic controls which could be included in the overall Pavement Management plan. The comments received from residents showed traffic related concerns for the following: • Road Striping • Road Signage • Road Condition • Truck Traffic • Traffic Volumes • Cut-through Traffic • Vehicle Speeds • Sight Lines The City hired Spack Consulting to conduct a two-phased study. Both phases of the study are attached. The first phase consisted of gathering data for the existing traffic conditions. This Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 8 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update included measuring existing average daily traffic volumes (ADTs), truck traffic volumes, pedestrian volumes, bicycle volumes, vehicle speeds, and AM and PM peak hour delays at intersections with traffic signals or stop signs. The study also included vehicle volume forecasts based on eight different scenarios of road closures, openings, and the conversion of one-way streets to two-way streets. The scenarios were a combination of the following conditions: • Closure of pavement behind Aldersgate Church • Conversion of Oxford Street to a two-way road from Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue • Conversion of Xenwood Avenue to a two-way road from Excelsior Boulevard to 39th Street • Opening of Wooddale Avenue cul-de-sac to continue to Goodrich Avenue Staff also collected additional traffic data in the Brooklawns neighborhood as well as performed stop sign warrants for every intersection in the Brooklawns and Elmwood neighborhoods. After receiving the existing traffic data, staff developed a traffic control scenario to implement for the duration of the study. Eleven modifications to the traffic control were made and were in-place from late August to early November. The modifications made were the following: • Installation of neighborhood traffic circles (NTCs) at: o Oxford Street & Brunswick Avenue o Goodrich Avenue & Brunswick Avenue o Goodrich Avenue & Zarthan Avenue o 39th Street & Zarthan Avenue o Brookview Drive & Brunswick Avenue • The section of pavement connecting the Aldersgate parking lot to the intersection of Cambridge Avenue & Wooddale Avenue was closed • Installation of a median at the north approach to Brunswick Avenue & Cambridge Street • Installation of an all-way stop intersection at Oxford Street & Zarthan Avenue • Conversion of Oxford Street to a two-way road between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue • Installation of curb extensions at: o West approach of 36th Street & Alabama Avenue o North approach of 37th Street & Brunswick Avenue Two rounds of data collection occurred during the temporary installation. The data collected on all road segments included vehicle volumes, vehicle speeds, and vehicle classifications. At select intersections, turn movements, bicycle volumes, pedestrian volumes, and video to analyze driver behavior were collected. During the study, staff decreased the diameter of the NTCs from 19 feet to 16 feet to allow for better maneuverability by first responders, public works vehicles, school buses, and garbage trucks. After the conclusion of the study in early November, all of the traffic control modifications were removed from City streets and the previous traffic control was restored. Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 9 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update Spack Consulting provided the City with a comprehensive report which included the data collected, analysis, and traffic control their recommendations. One of the recommendations by Spack Consulting is to convert Oxford Street to a two-way roadway east of Zarthan Avenue. During the temporary traffic control changes staff received feedback from the community that a defined turn lane for west bound Oxford Street from north bound Wooddale would reduce the concern of potential rear end collisions. Staff and Spack Consulting analyzed the intersection of Wooddale Avenue and Oxford Street and is suggesting a restriping of approximately 500 feet of Wooddale Avenue to provide better defined travel and turn lanes. Staff Traffic Control Recommendations After reviewing the report conducted by Spack Consulting, staff recommends the following traffic control modifications to occur in conjunction with the project: • Installation of NTCs at the following intersections: o Oxford Street & Brunswick Avenue o Goodrich Avenue & Brunswick Avenue • Block the section of pavement connecting Aldersgate Church parking lot to the intersection of Goodrich Avenue & Brunswick Avenue • Convert Oxford Street to a two-way road between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue • Restripe Wooddale from the Highway 100 ramp to approximately 200 feet north of Oxford Street. • Installation of an all-way stop control at the intersection of Oxford Street & Zarthan Avenue • Install curb extensions at: o West approach of 36th Street & Alabama Avenue o North approach of 37th Street & Brunswick Avenue o North approach of Cambridge Street & Brunswick Avenue Crosswalks: In the February meeting, residents also voiced concerns for pedestrian connections throughout the neighborhood. In particular, the intersection of 36th Street & Alabama Avenue was identified as a desired crossing. This possible link would further connect the Elmwood neighborhood to the nearby Cedar Lake Regional Trail, the Wooddale Avenue Bridge, and further north to St. Louis Park High School and the Sorenson neighborhood. In conjunction with the data gathered for the traffic management study, pedestrian volumes were collected at the intersection of 36th Street & Alabama Avenue. With the data collected, a pedestrian crosswalk warrant was conducted by staff. The west side of the intersection was identified as a crosswalk candidate. With the proposed curb extension on the west approach of 36th Street & Alabama Avenue, a pedestrian crosswalk is made safer with a decreased crossing distance. Staff Crosswalk Recommendation: After listening to resident concerns and reviewing data collected by Spack Consulting, staff recommends the following: • Installation of a pedestrian crosswalk on the west side of the intersection of 36th Street & Alabama Avenue Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 10 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update Public Process: Four open houses have been held or will be held to provide an opportunity for residents to learn more about the proposed project and to provide feedback on the proposed plans. Notifications were done through letters, sandwich boards, neighborhood associations, NextDoor, Constant Contact and the city website. 1. Elmwood Neighborhood Traffic Evaluation- Information Meeting (February 2, 2017) Prior to starting design for this project, staff held a meeting to have a conversation with the neighborhood related to the current traffic patterns, access to and from the neighborhood, walking and biking, parking and any other concerns related to moving through the neighborhood. The intent of the meeting was to gather information from residents. The feedback was used to develop the scope for a traffic management study. The study will collect data and provide potential alternatives to address concerns that could be incorporated into the Pavement Management plan. The following are the key comments and questions staff heard: o Issues related to alley condition o Appropriate location for bikeway o Miscellaneous comments about the process o Parking in the area o Existing and proposes sidewalk o Street reconstruction o Traffic § Signage/Striping, Roads, Trucks, Traffic Volumes, Speed, Sight lines o Utilities (City and Private) There were 41 residents who signed in at this open house out of 714 properties notified of the meeting. 2. Elmwood Neighborhood Traffic Evaluation- Open House (July 12, 2017) The intent of the Traffic Open House was to share the traffic data that was collected, report what we heard from the February meeting and to inform the residents on the temporary traffic control modifications proposed for the Elmwood and Brooklawns neighborhoods. There were 51 residents who signed in at this open house out of 688 properties notified of the meeting. 3. 2018 Pavement Management Open House #1 (December 12, 2017) This public meeting was a kickoff meeting to provide residents with high level information on what was being proposed for this project and the history of the Pavement Management Program. Information was provided on what to expect for future open houses and what to expect during construction. Staff presented recommendations for sidewalks, street widths and traffic control modifications. Residents were able to look at preliminary layouts and provide feedback to city staff. Many residents asked questions, wrote post it notes on the plans and provided suggestions for modifications to this preliminary design. Staff tried to Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Page 11 Title: 2018 Pavement Management Project Update incorporate these comments into a refined design. Feedback from this meeting ultimately helped guide city staff on the final designs. There were 40 residents who signed in at this open house out of 861 properties notified of the meeting. 4. 2018 Pavement Management Open House #2 (January 17, 2018) The purpose of this open house is to provide attendees with the staff recommended final design for streets and sidewalks. The final plans show impacts to trees, landscaping, retaining walls, etc. and the proposed construction limits. This is the last public information meeting before bringing this project to City Council for a public hearing and action. 5. City Council Public Hearing (February 5, 2018) The public hearing will provide an opportunity for residents to speak to council regarding the project. The council will then be asked to approve the project as recommended or approve a modified project based on resident feedback. If property owners were unable to attend the meetings, or if they had specific concerns that they wanted to walk through, staff met with them on site. Using the information gathered from the open houses, individual site visits, phone calls and emails, staff revised the sidewalk design to try to minimize the impacts within the right- of- way. When impacts could not be avoided, staff proposed mitigation. Engineering staff worked closely with Operations and Recreation staff to ensure the network of sidewalk being built would meet the objectives for tree preservation/ replanting and acceptable widths and design features for snow removal on community sidewalk segments. NEXT STEPS: The proposed schedule for the segments recommended by staff to facilitate construction in 2017 is as follows: Council Study Session January 16, 2018 Council Public Hearing February 5, 2018 Council Awards Construction Bids Early April 2018 Construction May to November 2018 ATTACHMENT #1- SIDEWALK SEGMENT MATRIX 1. Brookview Drive – Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 12 #1 Brookview Drive   (Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 50 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 4 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 272 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 1 Tree  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 20 Feet (To protect a tree)  Traffic ADT 418  Total Cost $15,926.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $58.55  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Will be reevaluated when Brookview Drive is under  construction in the future  Notes:  None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 13 2. Brookview Drive – Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 14 #2 Brookview Drive   (Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 50 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 3 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 268 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 2 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 2 Power Poles  Sidewalk at back of curb? 24 Feet (To protect trees)  Traffic ADT 418  Total Cost $17,422.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $65.01  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Will be reevaluated when Brookview Drive is under  construction in the future  Notes:  None    Resident Feedback: None    Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 15 3. Brookview Drive –Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 16 #3 Brookview Drive   (Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 4 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 369 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed 172 Feet  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted 144 Feet  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 75 Feet (Due to grades and ROW)  Traffic ADT 597  Total Cost $17,335.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $46.98  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Will be reevaluated when Brookview Drive is under  construction in the future  Notes:  None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 17 4. Brookview Drive –Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 18 #4 Brookview Drive   (Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 4 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 364 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 2 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed 104 Feet  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 Power Pole  Sidewalk at back of curb? 175 Feet (Due to grades and ROW)  Traffic ADT 597  Total Cost $19,703.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $54.13  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Will be reevaluated when Brookview Drive is under  construction in the future  Notes:  None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 19 5. Brunswick Avenue – Excelsior Boulevard to Brookview Drive (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 20 #5 Brunswick Avenue   (Excelsior Boulevard to Brookview Drive)  West Side  ROW Width 66 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 4 to 12.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 857 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 13 Resident Properties, 1 Business Property  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 3 Trees  Trees Protected 11 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 Handhole  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 230  Total Cost $34,178.25  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $39.88  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Less Impacts on the East Side of Brunswick Avenue  Notes:  1 utility handhole would need to be relocated Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 21 6. Brunswick Avenue – Excelsior Boulevard to Brookview Drive (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 22 #6 Brunswick Avenue   (Excelsior Boulevard to Brookview Drive)  East Side  ROW Width 66 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 6 to 11 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 612 Feet (72%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 234 Feet (28%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 13 Resident Properties, 1 Apartment Property  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 11 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 230  Total Cost $50,835.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $83.06  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Traffic Volumes, Less Impacts on the East Side of Brunswick  Avenue  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 23 7. Brunswick Avenue –Brookview Drive to RR Tracks (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 24 #7 Brunswick Avenue   (Brookview Drive to RR Tracks)  West Side  ROW Width 66 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 4 to 11 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 653 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 10 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 6 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 84  Total Cost $27,710.25  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $42.44  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low Traffic Volumes  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 25 8. Brunswick Avenue –Brookview Drive to RR Tracks (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 26 #8 Brunswick Avenue   (Brookview Drive to RR Tracks)  East Side  ROW Width 66 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 4 to 9 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 656 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 10 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 3 Trees  Trees Protected 5 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 84  Total Cost $31,606.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $48.18  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low Traffic Volumes  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 27 9. Brunswick Avenue –RR Tracks to Cambridge Street (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 28 #9 Brunswick Avenue   (RR Tracks to Cambridge St)  West Side  ROW Width 80 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 6 to 13 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 336 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 3 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 28  Total Cost $12,831.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $38.19  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low Traffic Volumes  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 29 10. Brunswick Avenue –RR Tracks to Cambridge Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 30 #10 Brunswick Avenue   (RR Tracks to Cambridge St)  East Side  ROW Width 80 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 6.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 336 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 1 Resident Property, 2 Apartment Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 5 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 130 Feet (due to grades and to protect trees)  Traffic ADT 28  Total Cost $13,564.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $40.37  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low Traffic Volumes  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 31 11. Brunswick Avenue –Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 32 #11 Brunswick Avenue   (Cambridge St to Goodrich Avenue)  West Side  ROW Width 80 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 4 to 20 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 374 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 3 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 Handhole  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 584  Total Cost $17,741.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $47.44  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Higher Traffic Volumes, Sidewalk would provide a continuous  sidewalk on both sides of the street  Notes:   1 utility handhole would need to relocated  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 33 12. Brunswick Avenue –Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 34 #12 Brunswick Avenue   (Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street)  East Side  ROW Width 80 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 11 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 380 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 6 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 620  Total Cost $31,126.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $81.91  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Higher Traffic Volumes, Sidewalk would provide a continuous sidewalk on both sides of the street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 35 13. Brunswick Avenue –Oxford Street to 37th Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 36 #13 Brunswick Avenue   (Oxford Street to 37th Street)  East Side  ROW Width 80 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 4.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 346 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 2 Trees  Trees Protected 6 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 791  Total Cost $21,964.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $63.48  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Higher Traffic Volumes, Sidewalk would provide a continuous  sidewalk on both sides of the street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 37 14. Brunswick Avenue/36th Street –37th Street to Alabama Avenue (East/South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 38 #14 Brunswick Avenue/36th Street   (37th Street to Alabama Avenue)  East/South Side  ROW Width 80/40 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 597 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 1 Business Property  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 8 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 city hydrant needs to relocated  Sidewalk at back of curb? 446 Feet (due to limited ROW and protect trees)  Traffic ADT 994/1044  Total Cost $57,752.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $96.74  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on Higher Traffic Volumes and Property support  Notes:   1 city hydrant needs to relocated  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 39 15. Dakota Avenue –Oxford Street to 37th Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 40 #15 Dakota Avenue   (Oxford Street to 37th Street)  East Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 170 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 1 Tree  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 60 Feet (to protect tree)  Traffic ADT 28  Total Cost $6,711.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $39.48  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on Connectivity of the existing sidewalk system  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 41 16. Colorado Avenue –Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 42 #16 Colorado Avenue   (Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street)  East Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 9.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 369 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 7 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 253 Feet (to protect tree)  Traffic ADT 70  Total Cost $18,563.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $50.31  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low traffic volumes, Existing sidewalk on west side  Notes:   None  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 43 17. Colorado Avenue –Oxford Street to 37th Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 44 #17 Colorado Avenue   (Oxford Street to 37th Street)  East Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 9.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 347 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 5 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 81  Total Cost $18,657.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $53.77  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low traffic volumes, Existing sidewalk on west side  Notes:   None  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 45 18. Oxford Street –Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 46 #18 Oxford Street   (Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 345 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties, 1 Apartment Property  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed 5 Trees  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed Yes (239 Feet)  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted Yes  Private Utility Relocations 1 Power Pole  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 368  Total Cost $13,173.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $38.18  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on Connection to City Park  Notes:   Two of the trees removed are due to necessary replacement of existing retaining wall.  One power  pole will need to relocated  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 47 19. Goodrich Avenue- Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 48 #19 Goodrich Avenue   (Colorado Avenue to Brunswick Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 110 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 to 11 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 263 Feet (63%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 156 Feet (37%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 5 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 6 Trees  Trees Protected 16 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 83  Total Cost $40,449.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $96.54  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Sidewalk would create continuous sidewalk on south side of  Goodrich Avenue, Trees removed are small diameter trees  Notes:   Existing sidewalk will be removed in front of two properties and new sidewalk will be closer to street  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 49 20. Goodrich Avenue- Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 50 #20 Goodrich Avenue   (Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 110 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 10 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 181 Feet (55%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 150 Feet (45%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 5 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 11 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 60  Total Cost $26,949.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $148.89  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Sidewalk would create continuous sidewalk on south side of  Goodrich Avenue  Notes:   Existing sidewalk will be removed in front of three properties and new sidewalk will be closer to  street  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 51 21. Wooddale Avenue- Dead End to Cambridge Street (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 52 #21 Wooddale Avenue   (Dead End to Cambridge Street)  West Side  ROW Width NA  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 244 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 2 Trees  Trees Protected 1 Tree  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT NA (<100)  Total Cost $21,008.5  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $86.10  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Low traffic volumes, Existing sidewalk on east side, Tree  Impacts  Notes:   None  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 53 22. Wooddale Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 54 #22 Wooddale Avenue   (Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue)  West Side  ROW Width 66 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 416 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 8 Trees  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 City Hydrant  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 60  Total Cost $28,999.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $69.71  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Low traffic volumes, Existing sidewalk on east side, Tree  Impacts  Notes:   1 city hydrant would need relocating  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 55 23. Yosemite Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 56 #23 Yosemite Avenue   (39th Street to Cambridge Street)  West Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 8 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 359 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 10 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted Yes  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 583  Total Cost $25,993.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $72.41  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Existing sidewalk on east side of Yosemite Avenue  Notes:   None  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 57 24. Yosemite Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 58 #24 Yosemite Avenue   (Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue)  West Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 4 to 7.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 372 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 6 Trees  Trees Protected 4 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 4 Power Poles  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 291  Total Cost $21,848.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $58.73  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Existing sidewalk on east side of Yosemite Avenue, Tree  impacts, Utility relocates  Notes:   4 Power poles need relocating  Resident None   Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 59 25. Zarthan Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 60 #25 Zarthan Avenue   (39th Street to Cambridge Street)  West Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 353 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 7 Trees  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 307  Total Cost $20,517  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $58.12  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Tree Impacts  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 61 26. Zarthan Avenue- 39th Street to Cambridge Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 62 #26 Zarthan Avenue   (39th Street to Cambridge Street)  East Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 to 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 354 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 4 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 354 Feet (to protect trees)  Traffic ADT 307  Total Cost $26,268.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $74.20  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Sidewalk would create a continuous sidewalk on east side of  Zarthan Avenue, Minimal impacts  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 63 27. Zarthan Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 64 #27 Zarthan Avenue   (Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue)  West Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 375 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 2 Trees  Trees Protected 2 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 3 Power Poles  Sidewalk at back of curb? 167 Feet (to protect trees)  Traffic ADT 242  Total Cost $28,998.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $77.33  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Tree and utility impacts  Notes:   3 power poles would need relocating  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 65 28. Zarthan Avenue- Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 66 #28 Zarthan Avenue   (Cambridge Street to Goodrich Avenue)  East Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 374 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 10 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 374 Feet (to protect trees)  Traffic ADT 242  Total Cost $29,684.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $79.37  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Sidewalk would create a continuous sidewalk on east side of  Zarthan Avenue, Minimal impacts  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 67 29. Zarthan Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (West Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 68 #29 Zarthan Avenue   (Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street)  West Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 371 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 6 Trees  Trees Protected 1 Tree  New Retaining Wall Needed Yes (125 Feet)  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted Yes  Private Utility Relocations 1 Power Pole  Sidewalk at back of curb? 19 Feet (to protect tree)  Traffic ADT 370  Total Cost $27,109.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $73.07  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Existing sidewalk on portion of east side of Zarthan Avenue  with less impacts to complete gap  Notes:   1 power pole would need relocating  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 69 30. Zarthan Avenue- Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street (East Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 70 #30 Zarthan Avenue   (Goodrich Avenue to Oxford Street)  East Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 198 Feet (53%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 177 Feet (47%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 1 Resident Property  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 1 Tree  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 198 Feet (Existing sidewalk at back of curb)  Traffic ADT 370  Total Cost $15,904.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $42.99  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Existing sidewalk on portion of Zarthan Avenue with less  impacts to complete gap  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 71 31. Cambridge Street- Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 72 #31 Cambridge Street   (Brunswick Avenue to Alabama Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 300 Feet (85%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 53 Feet (15%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 4 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 3 Trees  Trees Protected 2 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 1,689  Total Cost $25,470.25  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $84.90  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Tree and grade impacts, Existing sidewalk on north side of  Cambridge Street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 73 32. Cambridge Street- Alabama Avenue to Park Driveway (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 74 #32 Cambridge Street   (Alabama Avenue Park Driveway)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 14 Feet  Proposed Trail Width 8 Feet (Bituminous Trail)  Proposed Trail Length 135 Feet (100%)  Existing Trail Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 1 Park Property  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 3 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 445  Total Cost $6,768.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $44.53  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on Connection from Alabama Avenue to City Park  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 75 33. Cambridge Street- Park Driveway to Zarthan Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 76 #33 Cambridge Street   (Park Driveway to Zarthan Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 195 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 1 Park Property, 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed 8 Trees  Trees Protected 2 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 445  Total Cost $13,704.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $70.28  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Tree Impacts  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 77 34. Cambridge Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 78 #34 Cambridge Street   (Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 4.5 to 8.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 207 Feet (59%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 147 Feet (41%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 4 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 340  Total Cost $8,872.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $47.69  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on Minimal Impacts  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 79 35. Cambridge Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 80 #35 Cambridge Street   (Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 7 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 279 Feet (78%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 77 Feet (22%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 4 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 6 Trees  Trees Protected 4 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 Power Pole  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 340  Total Cost $21,821.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $78.21  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Tree and grade impacts  Notes:   1 power pole would need to be relocated  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 81 36. Cambridge Street- Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 82 #36 Cambridge Street   (Yosemite Avenue to Wooddale Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 8 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 560 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 7 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 6 Trees  Trees Protected 4 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted Yes  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 150  Total Cost $40,982.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $73.18  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Tree impacts, Existing sidewalk on north side of Cambridge  Street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 83 37. 39th Street- Dead End to Alabama Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 84 #37 39th Street   (Dead End to Alabama Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 297 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 10 Trees  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 Power Pole  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 38  Total Cost $14,003.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $47.15  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low traffic volumes, tree impacts  Notes:   1 power pole needs relocating  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 85 38. 39th Street- Dead End to Alabama Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 86 #38 39th Street   (Dead End to Alabama Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 to 8.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 298 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 4 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 6 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 Power Pole  Sidewalk at back of curb? 216 Feet (to protect trees)  Traffic ADT 38  Total Cost $15,095.25  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $50.66  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low traffic volumes  Notes:   1 power pole needs relocating  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 87 39. 39th Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 88 #39 39th Street   (Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 334 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 1 Power Pole  Sidewalk at back of curb? 334 Feet (due to short driveway lengths)  Traffic ADT 351  Total Cost $15,180.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $45.45  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Continuous sidewalk on south side of 39th Street, Minimal  impacts  Notes:   1 power pole needs relocating  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 89 40. 39th Street- Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 90 #40 39th Street   (Alabama Avenue to Zarthan Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 7 to 8 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 134 Feet (38%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 212 Feet (62%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 2 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 351  Total Cost $7,605.25  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $56.76  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on Sidewalk would complete missing gap (38%)  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 91 41. 39th Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 92 #41 39th Street   (Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 350 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 13 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 350 Feet (due to short driveway lengths)  Traffic ADT 309  Total Cost $18,503.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $52.87  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Continuous sidewalk on south side of 39th Street, Minimal  impacts  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 93 42. 39th Street- Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 94 #42 39th Street   (Zarthan Avenue to Yosemite Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 to 10 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 355 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 3 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 6 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 309  Total Cost $16,680.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $46.99  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Less impacts on south side of 39th Street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 95 43. 39th Street- Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 96 #43 39th Street   (Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 331 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 331 Feet (to short distance to houses)  Traffic ADT 321  Total Cost $16,672.00  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $50.37  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on  Continuous sidewalk on south side of 39th Street, Minimal  impacts  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 97 44. 39th Street- Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 98 #44 39th Street   (Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 331 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 6 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 6 Trees  Trees Protected 5 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed Yes (137 Feet)  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted Yes  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 331 Feet (to protect trees and grade)  Traffic ADT 321  Total Cost $24,003.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $72.52  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Less impacts on south side of 39th Street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback: None  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 99 45. 39th Street- Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 100 #45 39th Street   (Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 6 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 282 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 4 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Community Sidewalk (City)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected 7 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? 282 Feet (to protect trees)  Traffic ADT 99  Total Cost $13,447.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $47.69  Recommendation Yes  Recommendation based on Continuous sidewalk on south side of 39th Street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 101 46. 39th Street- Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 102 #46 39th Street   (Xenwood Avenue to Webster Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 60 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 8.5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 311 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 5 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 1 Tree  Trees Protected 6 Trees  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations None  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 99  Total Cost $20,312.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $65.31  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Continuous sidewalk would be on the south side of 39th Street  Notes:   None  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 103 47. 42nd Street- Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 104 #47 42nd Street   (Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 40 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 401 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 5 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 5 Trees  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted Yes  Private Utility Relocations 4 communications boxes  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 156  Total Cost $34,429.25  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $85.86  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low traffic volumes, Tree impacts, utility relocation  Notes:   4 Communications boxes would need relocating  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 105 48. 42nd Street- Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue (North Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 106 #48 42nd Street   (Webster Avenue to Vernon Avenue)  North Side  ROW Width 40 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 0 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 237 Feet (100%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 0 Feet (0%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 2 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed None  Trees Protected None  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted None  Private Utility Relocations 3 Power Poles  Sidewalk at back of curb? Yes (limited right of way)  Traffic ADT 156  Total Cost $12,314.75  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $51.96  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on Low traffic volumes, utility relocations, limited right of way  Notes:   3 power poles would need relocating  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 107 49. Vermont Street- Yosemite Avenue to Vernon Avenue (South Side) Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 108 #49 Vermont Street   (Yosemite Avenue to Vernon Avenue)  South Side  ROW Width 40 Feet  Proposed Boulevard Width 2 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Width 5 Feet  Proposed Sidewalk Length 517 Feet (65%)  Existing Sidewalk Length 284 Feet (35%)  Properties Affected by Proposed Sidewalk 8 Resident Properties  Maintenance Responsibility Neighborhood Sidewalk (Resident)  Trees Removed 2 Trees  Trees Protected 1 Tree  New Retaining Wall Needed None  Existing Retaining Wall Impacted Yes  Private Utility Relocations 6 Power Poles  Sidewalk at back of curb? None  Traffic ADT 87  Total Cost $28,647.50  Cost per Linear Foot (LF) of New Sidewalk $55.41  Recommendation No  Recommendation based on  Low traffic volumes, Existing sidewalk on north side of Vermont  Street, Utility relocations, Limited right of way  Notes:   6 power poles would need relocating  Resident Feedback:  See Resident Feedback Attached  Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 109 aaPP PP PP PP PP +¢ +¢ VV VV `` +¢ VV--")3 ¬«100 41ST ST W OXFO R D ST PARK CENTER BLVDALABAMAAVESSERVICE DR H I G H W AY 7 36TH ST W CAMBRIDGE ST AUTO CLUB WAY COLORADOAVE SYOSEMITE AVE SWO OD D A L E AVEXENWOODAVESXENWOODAVESGOODRICH AVE XENWOODAVESCOLORADOAVESDAKOTAAVESBRUNSWICKAVESBRUNSWICKAVESWOODDALE AVEEDGEWOODAVES39TH ST W BROOKVIEW DR 39TH ST W 36TH ST W ALABAMAAVESDAKOTAAVESOXFORD ST YOSEMITEAVESZARTHANAVES37TH ST W GOODRICH AVE PRIVATE RDBROOKSIDEAVESCOLORADOAVESWEBSTERAVESVERNONAVESPRIVATE RD WEBSTERAVESWEBSTERAVESHOSPITALSERVICEDR¯ 2018 PM- Sidewalk and Traffic Control Recommendations(Elmwood and Brooklawns Neighborhood) Sidewalk Recommendations Not Recommended in 2018:SidewalkRecommended for 2018Sidewalk (City Maintained)Sidewalk (Resident Maintained)Existing Sidewalk and Trails:Existng Sidewalk (Resident Maintained)Existing Sidewalk (City/Contract Maintained)Existing TrailsCity Limits 44th St. W. Traffic ControlRecommendations Not Recommended in 2018: PP Traffic Circle --Center MedianRecommended for 2018 PP Traffic Circle with Yield Signs VV Curb Extensions+¢Road Closed ``All Way Stop aa Convert to 2-Way Traffic CROSSWALK EVALUATING LEFT TURN LANESON WOODDALE AVE Open House #1- Dec. 12, 2017 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 110 ")3 ¬«100 41ST ST W OXFO R D S T PARK CENTER BLVDALABAMAAVESSERVICE DR H IG H WA Y 7 36TH ST W CAMBRIDGE ST WEBSTERAVE SAUTO CLUB WAY COLORADOAVE SYOSEMITE AVE SWO OD D A L E AVEXENWOODAVESXENWOODAVESGOODRICH AVE XENWOODAVESCOLORADOAVESDAKOTAAVESBRUNSWICKAVESBRUNSWICKAVESWOODDALE AVEEDGEWOODAVES39TH ST W BROOKVIEW DR 39TH ST W 36TH ST W ALABAMAAVESDAKOTAAVESOXFORD ST YOSEMITEAVESZARTHANAVES37TH ST W GOODRICH AVE PRIVATE RDBROOKSIDEAVESCOLORADOAVESWEBSTERAVESVERNONAVESPRIVATE RD WEBSTERAVESWEBSTERAVESHOSPITALSERVICEDR¯ 2018 PM- Project Scope and Proposed Street Widths(Elmwood and Brooklawns Neighborhood) 44th St. W. 30' to 28'30' to 26'30' to 26'30' to 26'30' to 26'30' to 28'30' to 28'30' to 28'30' to 28'30' to 28'30' to 28'30' to 28'30'30' to 28'30' to 28'30'30' to 28'26'30' to 28' 30' to 28'20'28' 30' to 28'30'30'30' to 25'30' to 25'40'40'40'30'30'30' to 25'Legend Watermain Replacement Pavement Rehabilation XX ' TO XX ' PROPOSED STREET WIDTH CHANGES No ParkingSouth Side Open House #1- Dec. 12, 2017 30'No ParkingWest SideNo ParkingWest SideNo ParkingWest SideNo ParkingSouth Side No ParkingSouth Side No ParkingSouth Side Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 111 ¬«100 UTICAAVESTOLEDOAVESMORNINGSIDE RD 42ND ST W 41ST ST W HOBARTLN43 1/2 ST W BROOKSIDEAVES YOSEMITEAVESXENWOOD AVE SWEBSTERAVES42ND ST W 41ST ST W VERMONT ST BROOKAVESZARTHANAVESMACKEYAVESWOOD LN VERNONAVESWEBSTERAVESZARTHANAVES¯ 2018 PM- Project Scope, Proposed Street Widths, and Sidewalk Recommendations(Brookside Neighborhood) 44th St. W.26'Legend Watermain Replacement Pavement Rehabilation XX ' TO XX ' PROPOSED STREET WIDTH CHANGES26'34.5'26'Open House #1- Dec. 12, 2017 Sidewalk Recommendations Not Recommended: Sidewalk Recommended for 2018 Sidewalk (City Maintained) Sidewalk (Resident Maintained) Existing Sidewalk and Trails: Existng Sidewalk (Resident Maintained) Existing Sidewalk (City/Contract Maintained) Existing Trails Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 112 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 113 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 114 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 115 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 116 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 117 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 118 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 119 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 120 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 121 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 122 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 123 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 124 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 125 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 126 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 127 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 128 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 129 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 130 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 131 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 132 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 133 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 134 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 135 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 136 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 137 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 138 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 139 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 140 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 141 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 142 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 143 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 144 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 145 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 146 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 147 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 148 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 149 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 150 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 151 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 152 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 153 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 154 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 155 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 156 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 157 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 158 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 159 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 160 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 161 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 162 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 163 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 164 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 165 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 166 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 167 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 168 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 169 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 170 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 171 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 172 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 173 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 174 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 175 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 176 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 177 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 178 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 179 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 180 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 181 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 182 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 183 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 184 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 185 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 186 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 187 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 188 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 189 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 190 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 191 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 192 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 193 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 194 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 195 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 196 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 197 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 198 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 199 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 200 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 201 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 202 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 203 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 204 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 205 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 206 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 207 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 208 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 209 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 210 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 211 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 212 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 213 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 214 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 215 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 216 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 217 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 218 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 219 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 220 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 221 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 222 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 223 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 224 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 225 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 226 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 227 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 228 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 229 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 230 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 231 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 232 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 233 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 234 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 235 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 236 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 237 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 238 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 239 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 240 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 241 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 242 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 243 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 244 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 245 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 246 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 247 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 248 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 249 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 250 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 251 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 252 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 253 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 254 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 255 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 256 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 257 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 258 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 259 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 260 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 261 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 262 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 263 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 264 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 265 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 266 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 267 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 268 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 269 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 270 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 271 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 272 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 273 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 274 Figure 1 AM & PM Peak Hour Delays - Signalized Intersection Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (55 seconds) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Excelsior Boulevard & Xenwood Avenue/Hwy 100 RampAverage Dealy (seconds)Existing Oxford Two-way Xenwood Two-way Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Oxford Two-way & Xenwood Two-way Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Wooddale Connection Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (55 seconds) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 Excelsior Boulevard & Xenwood Avenue/Hwy 100 RampAverage Dealy (seconds)Existing Oxford Two-way Xenwood Two-way Wooddale Connection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 275 Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (35 seconds) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Cambridge Street & Brunswick Avenue Cambridge Street & Alabama AvenueAverage Dealy (seconds)Existing Oxford Two-way Xenwood Two-way Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Oxford Two-way & Xenwood Two-way Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Wooddale Connection Figure 2 AM & PM Peak Hour Delays - All Way Stop Intersections Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (35 seconds) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Cambridge Street & Brunswick Avenue Cambridge Street & Alabama AvenueAverage Dealy (seconds)Existing Oxford Two-way Xenwood Two-way Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Oxford Two-way & Xenwood Two-way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 276 Unreasonable 95th Percentile Queue (5 Vehicles) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wooddale Avenue & Oxford Street Alabama Avenue & 37th Street/Private Road 1 Wooddale Avenue & Private Road 1 Alabama Avenue & Private Road 2 Wooddale Avenue & Private Road 295th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing Oxford Two-way Xenwood Two-way Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Oxford Two-way & Xenwood Two-way Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Wooddale Connection Figure 3 AM & PM Peak Hour Delays - Side Street Stop Intersections Unreasonable 95th Percentile Queue (5 Vehicles) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Wooddale Avenue & Oxford Street Alabama Avenue & 37th Street/Private Road 1 Wooddale Avenue & Private Road 1 Alabama Avenue & Private Road 2 Wooddale Avenue & Private Road 295th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Existing Oxford Two-way Xenwood Two-way Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Oxford Two-way & Xenwood Two-way Oxford Two-way & Wooddale Connection Xenwood Two-way & Wooddale Connection AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 277 NB or WB Day 1 NB or WB Day 2 NB or WB Avg SB or EB Day 1 SB or EB Day 2 SB or EB Avg Total Day 1 Total Day 2 Total Avg 1 37th St W between Dakota Ave & Colorado Ave 23 15 19 19 10 15 42 25 34 2 37th St W between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 97 103 100 93 70 82 190 173 182 3 37th St W between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 55 50 53 99 82 91 154 132 143 4 36th St W between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 2067 2017 2042 1998 2002 2000 4065 4019 4042 5 36th St W between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 607 639 623 414 427 421 1021 1066 1044 6 Brunswick Ave between 36th St W & 37th St W 390 400 395 587 610 599 977 1010 994 7 Alabama Ave between 36th St W & 37th St W 1644 1619 1632 1506 1444 1475 3150 3063 3107 8 Wooddale Ave between Private Road 1 & Private Road 2 4374 4197 4286 4508 4515 4512 8882 8712 8797 9 Dakota Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 15 8 12 17 14 16 32 22 27 10 Colorado Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 42 29 36 38 52 45 80 81 81 11 Brunswick Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 316 328 322 461 476 469 777 804 791 12 Alabama Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 1487 1455 1471 1343 1243 1293 2830 2698 2764 13 Oxford St between Dakota Ave & Colorado Ave 24 19 22 30 28 29 54 47 51 14 Oxford St between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 85 89 87 106 135 121 191 224 208 15 Oxford St between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 46 53 50 125 171 148 171 224 198 16 Oxford St between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 14 21 18 331 368 350 345 389 367 17 Oxford St between Zarthan Ave & Wooddale Ave 3 6 5 672 702 687 675 708 692 18 Private Road 2 between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 213 223 218 118 120 119 331 343 337 19 Private Road 1 between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 106 87 97 104 87 96 210 174 192 20 Wooddale Ave between Oxford St & Wooddale Ave 3978 3852 3915 4716 4751 4734 8694 8603 8649 21 Colorado Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 48 44 46 24 24 24 72 68 70 22 Brunswick Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 261 279 270 347 352 350 608 631 620 23 Alabama Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 1600 1607 1604 1380 1304 1342 2980 2911 2946 24 Zarthan Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 358 341 350 25 15 20 383 356 370 25 Goodrich Ave between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 41 45 43 41 39 40 82 84 83 26 Goodrich Ave between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 51 46 49 43 47 45 94 93 94 27 Goodrich Ave between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 101 100 101 115 131 123 216 231 224 28 Goodrich Ave between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 262 245 254 101 97 99 363 342 353 Location Daily Volumes Figure 4A Existing ADT Table Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 278 NB or WB Day 1 NB or WB Day 2 NB or WB Avg SB or EB Day 1 SB or EB Day 2 SB or EB Avg Total Day 1 Total Day 2 Total Avg 29 Wooddale Ave between Wooddale Ave & Dead End 178 203 191 176 213 195 354 416 385 30 Brunswick Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 222 221 222 349 374 362 571 595 583 31 Alabama Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 1387 1493 1440 1263 1279 1271 2650 2772 2711 32 Zarthan Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 181 245 213 31 27 29 212 272 242 33 Yosemite Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 230 235 233 52 63 58 282 298 290 34 Frontage Rd between Parking Lot & Wooddale Ave 25 26 26 45 45 45 70 71 71 35 Wooddale Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 34 24 29 34 27 31 68 51 60 36 Cambridge St between RR Bridge & Brunswick Ave 1037 1114 1076 1108 1136 1122 2145 2250 2198 37 Cambridge St between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 751 809 780 887 931 909 1638 1740 1689 38 Cambridge St between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 201 194 198 237 256 247 438 450 444 39 Cambridge St between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 166 192 179 161 166 164 327 358 343 40 Cambridge St between Yosemite Ave & Wooddale Ave 77 76 77 75 70 73 152 146 149 41 Brunswick Ave between Cambridge St & Dead End 15 15 15 15 10 13 30 25 28 42 Alabama Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 1538 1661 1600 994 994 994 2532 2655 2594 43 Zarthan Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 178 231 205 96 108 102 274 339 307 44 Yosemite Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 388 396 392 186 196 191 574 592 583 45 Xenwood Ave between Dead End & 39th St W 6 5 6 4 4 4 10 9 10 46 39th St W between Dead End & Alabama Ave 31 25 28 9 11 10 40 36 38 47 39th St W between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 215 238 227 111 137 124 326 375 351 48 39th St W between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 214 204 209 85 115 100 299 319 309 49 39th St W between Yosemite Ave & Xenwood Ave 261 245 253 65 70 68 326 315 321 50 39th St W between Xenwood Ave & Webster Ave 54 41 48 52 49 51 106 90 98 51 Alabama Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 1565 1714 1640 1452 1547 1500 3017 3261 3139 52 Zarthan Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 199 268 234 141 143 142 340 411 376 53 Yosemite Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 380 345 363 296 288 292 676 633 655 54 Xenwood Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 181 185 183 4 4 4 185 189 187 55 Webster Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 39 21 30 73 59 66 112 80 96 Location Daily Volumes Figure 4B Existing ADT Table Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 279 NB or WB Day 1 NB or WB Day 2 NB or WB Avg SB or EB Day 1 SB or EB Day 2 SB or EB Avg Total Day 1 Total Day 2 Total Avg 1 37th St W between Dakota Ave & Colorado Ave 26.7 24.5 26 24.1 23.6 24 26.4 24.2 25 2 37th St W between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 24.8 24.3 25 29.1 28.9 29 27.9 27 27 3 37th St W between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 21.4 21.9 22 21.3 19 20 21.4 19.8 21 4 36th St W between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 24.1 24.1 24 23.8 23.8 24 24 24 24 5 36th St W between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 32 31 32 28.4 28.1 28 30 29.6 30 6 Brunswick Ave between 36th St W & 37th St W 24.9 24.4 25 28.6 27.9 28 27.8 26.7 27 7 Alabama Ave between 36th St W & 37th St W 31.6 31.7 32 32.5 32.2 32 32 32 32 8 Wooddale Ave between Private Road 1 & Private Road 2 31.8 32.1 32 33.3 33 33 32.7 32.6 33 9 Dakota Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 19.4 20.8 20 18.1 18.9 19 18.8 19.6 19 10 Colorado Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 21.8 21.1 21 23.1 22.9 23 22.6 22.6 23 11 Brunswick Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 33.2 32.4 33 30.5 29.4 30 32 30.5 31 12 Alabama Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 34 13 Oxford St between Dakota Ave & Colorado Ave 26.9 25.8 26 18.7 18.6 19 23.6 22.5 23 14 Oxford St between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 24.5 24.4 24 25.6 24.7 25 24.9 24.6 25 15 Oxford St between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 27.1 24.7 26 28 26.8 27 27.8 26.5 27 16 Oxford St between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 23 26.7 25 24.8 24.6 25 24.8 24.7 25 17 Oxford St between Zarthan Ave & Wooddale Ave 30.3 28.3 29 26.4 25 26 26.4 25.2 26 18 Private Road 2 between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 18.8 19.3 19 19.1 19 19 18.9 19.2 19 19 Private Road 1 between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 15.2 17.1 16 17.8 17.5 18 16.9 17.3 17 20 Wooddale Ave between Oxford St & Wooddale Ave 31.9 32.3 32 34.3 34.2 34 33.6 33.6 34 21 Colorado Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 22 24 23 23 21 22 22 24 23 22 Brunswick Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 29.6 29.6 30 31.9 31.1 32 30.9 30.2 31 23 Alabama Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 35 35 35 36 35 36 36 35 36 24 Zarthan Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 27 26 27 24 24 24 27 26 27 25 Goodrich Ave between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 28.5 28 28 26.8 26.4 27 27.7 27.6 28 26 Goodrich Ave between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 26.3 26.6 26 25 24.5 25 25.9 25.5 26 27 Goodrich Ave between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 29 30 30 24 24 24 26 26 26 28 Goodrich Ave between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 26.9 25.9 26 30.1 30 30 28.4 28.2 28 Location 85th Percentile Speeds (mph) Figure 5B Existing 85th Percentile Speeds Table Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 280 NB or WB Day 1 NB or WB Day 2 NB or WB Avg SB or EB Day 1 SB or EB Day 2 SB or EB Avg Total Day 1 Total Day 2 Total Avg 29 Wooddale Ave between Wooddale Ave & Dead End 14.1 13.9 14 19.5 19.2 19 18.3 17.9 18 30 Brunswick Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 27 27 27 34 35 35 32 33 33 31 Alabama Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 31 31 31 27 28 28 30 31 31 32 Zarthan Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 22 23 23 24 23 24 22 23 23 33 Yosemite Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 26 26 26 27 27 27 26 27 27 34 Frontage Rd between Parking Lot & Wooddale Ave 13.6 13.6 14 18.5 18.6 19 17.9 17.9 18 35 Wooddale Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 22.8 23.5 23 19.6 20.5 20 21.9 22.4 22 36 Cambridge St between RR Bridge & Brunswick Ave 27.7 28.4 28 23.9 23.8 24 25.2 26.4 26 37 Cambridge St between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 22 23 23 27 27 27 26 26 26 38 Cambridge St between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 26 27 27 27 27 27 26 27 27 39 Cambridge St between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 26 26 26 32 34 33 31 31 31 40 Cambridge St between Yosemite Ave & Wooddale Ave 30 30 30 29 30 30 29 30 30 41 Brunswick Ave between Cambridge St & Dead End 13 16 15 19 19 19 17 18 18 42 Alabama Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 28 28 28 31 31 31 30 30 30 43 Zarthan Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 22 24 23 18 19 19 22 22 22 44 Yosemite Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 26.3 26.7 27 25.1 24.9 25 26 26.3 26 45 Xenwood Ave between Dead End & 39th St W 12.7 18.8 16 12.3 12.3 12 13 13.9 13 46 39th St W between Dead End & Alabama Ave 18 18 18 10 12 11 18 17 18 47 39th St W between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 28 28 28 27 28 28 28 28 28 48 39th St W between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 28 29 29 28 30 29 28 30 29 49 39th St W between Yosemite Ave & Xenwood Ave 30 31 31 27 29 28 29 30 30 50 39th St W between Xenwood Ave & Webster Ave 30 29 30 29 29 29 29 29 29 51 Alabama Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 37 37 37 35 36 36 36 36 36 52 Zarthan Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 30 30 30 30 29 30 30 30 30 53 Yosemite Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 29 28 29 27 27 27 28 28 28 54 Xenwood Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 31 32 32 34 27 31 31 32 32 55 Webster Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 32 27 30 34 33 34 33 32 33 85th Percentile Speeds (mph)Location Figure 5B Existing 85th Percentile Speeds Table Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 281 NB or WB Day 1 NB or WB Day 2 NB or WB Avg SB or EB Day 1 SB or EB Day 2 SB or EB Avg Total Day 1 Total Day 2 Total Avg 1 37th St W between Dakota Ave & Colorado Ave 9% 0%4% (1)16% 0%8% (2)12% 0%6% (3) 2 37th St W between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 0% 0%0% (0)1% 0%1% (1)1% 0%0% (1) 3 37th St W between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 0% 0%0% (0)5% 6%6% (5)3% 4%4% (5) 4 36th St W between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 1% 1%1% (11)1% 1%1% (19)1% 1%1% (30) 5 36th St W between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 1% 2%1% (9)0% 0%0% (0)1% 1%1% (9) 6 Brunswick Ave between 36th St W & 37th St W 0% 0%0% (0)1% 1%1% (9)1% 1%1% (9) 7 Alabama Ave between 36th St W & 37th St W 1% 1%1% (13)1% 0%0% (6)1% 1%1% (19) 8 Wooddale Ave between Private Road 1 & Private Road 2 1% 1%1% (26)0% 1%0% (19)1% 0%1% (45) 9 Dakota Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 27% 0%13% (2)0% 0%0% (0)13% 0%6% (2) 10 Colorado Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 7% 0%4% (2)5% 0%3% (1)6% 0%3% (3) 11 Brunswick Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 0% 0%0% (0)1% 0%0% (2)0% 0%0% (2) 12 Alabama Ave between 37th St W & Oxford St 1% 0%1% (8)1% 1%1% (13)1% 1%1% (20) 13 Oxford St between Dakota Ave & Colorado Ave 13% 0%6% (2)7% 0%3% (1)9% 0%5% (3) 14 Oxford St between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 0% 0%0% (0)3% 0%1% (2)2% 0%1% (2) 15 Oxford St between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 0% 0%0% (0)2% 1%2% (2)2% 0%1% (2) 16 Oxford St between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 7% 0%4% (1)1% 0%1% (3)2% 0%1% (3) 17 Oxford St between Zarthan Ave & Wooddale Ave 0% 0%0% (0)1% 1%1% (7)1% 1%1% (7) 18 Private Road 2 between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 1% 0%1% (2)0% 0%0% (0)1% 0%0% (2) 19 Private Road 1 between Alabama Ave & Wooddale Ave 0% 1%1% (1)2% 0%1% (1)1% 1%1% (2) 20 Wooddale Ave between Oxford St & Wooddale Ave 1% 1%1% (30)1% 1%1% (24)1% 1%1% (54) 21 Colorado Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 4% 0%2% (1)0% 0%0% (0)3% 0%2% (1) 22 Brunswick Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 0% 0%0% (1)1% 0%0% (2)0% 0%0% (2) 23 Alabama Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 1% 0%1% (8)1% 1%1% (14)1% 1%1% (22) 24 Zarthan Ave between Oxford St & Goodrich Ave 3% 3%3% (11)12% 8%10% (2)3% 3%3% (13) 25 Goodrich Ave between Colorado Ave & Brunswick Ave 2% 0%1% (1)5% 0%2% (1)4% 0%2% (2) 26 Goodrich Ave between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 6% 0%3% (2)0% 2%1% (1)3% 1%2% (2) 27 Goodrich Ave between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 2% 0%1% (1)0% 0%0% (0)1% 0%1% (1) 28 Goodrich Ave between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 1% 0%0% (1)2% 0%1% (1)1% 0%1% (2) Heavy Vehicle Percentage (Volume) Location Figure 6B Existing Heavy Vehicle Percentages Table Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 282 NB or WB Day 1 NB or WB Day 2 NB or WB Avg SB or EB Day 1 SB or EB Day 2 SB or EB Avg Total Day 1 Total Day 2 Total Avg 29 Wooddale Ave between Wooddale Ave & Dead End 2% 3%2% (4)0% 1%0% (1)1% 1%1% (5) 30 Brunswick Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 2% 4%3% (7)1% 1%1% (4)1% 2%2% (10) 31 Alabama Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 0% 1%1% (8)1% 1%1% (13)0% 1%1% (21) 32 Zarthan Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 0% 0%0% (0)4% 0%2% (1)0% 0%0% (1) 33 Yosemite Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 0% 1%1% (1)0% 0%0% (0)0% 1%1% (1) 34 Frontage Rd between Parking Lot & Wooddale Ave 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) 35 Wooddale Ave between Goodrich Ave & Cambridge St 9% 0%4% (2)9% 0%4% (2)9% 0%4% (3) 36 Cambridge St between RR Bridge & Brunswick Ave 1% 1%1% (6)1% 2%1% (16)1% 1%1% (22) 37 Cambridge St between Brunswick Ave & Alabama Ave 1% 1%1% (8)1% 1%1% (9)1% 1%1% (17) 38 Cambridge St between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 0% 1%1% (1)0% 1%1% (2)0% 1%1% (3) 39 Cambridge St between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 0% 0%0% (0)2% 3%3% (4)1% 1%1% (4) 40 Cambridge St between Yosemite Ave & Wooddale Ave 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) 41 Brunswick Ave between Cambridge St & Dead End 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) 42 Alabama Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 1% 1%1% (16)0% 1%1% (5)1% 1%1% (21) 43 Zarthan Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 0% 0%0% (0)0% 1%1% (1)0% 0%0% (1) 44 Yosemite Ave between Cambridge St & 39th St W 0% 0%0% (0)1% 1%1% (2)0% 0%0% (2) 45 Xenwood Ave between Dead End & 39th St W 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) 46 39th St W between Dead End & Alabama Ave 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) 47 39th St W between Alabama Ave & Zarthan Ave 1% 1%1% (2)0% 1%1% (1)1% 1%1% (3) 48 39th St W between Zarthan Ave & Yosemite Ave 1% 2%2% (3)0% 2%1% (1)0% 0%0% (4) 49 39th St W between Yosemite Ave & Xenwood Ave 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) 50 39th St W between Xenwood Ave & Webster Ave 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) 51 Alabama Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 1% 1%1% (17)0% 1%1% (8)1% 1%1% (24) 52 Zarthan Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 1% 0%1% (1)2% 3%3% (4)1% 1%1% (5) 53 Yosemite Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 0% 1%1% (2)1% 1%1% (3)0% 1%1% (5) 54 Xenwood Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 1% 1%1% (2)0% 0%0% (0)1% 1%1% (2) 55 Webster Ave between 39th St W & Excelsior Blvd 0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0)0% 0%0% (0) Location Heavy Vehicle Percentage (Volume) Figure 6B Existing Heavy Vehicle Percentages Table Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 283 24 32 24 28 32 32 32 16 28 25 25 22 18 33 26 29 20 19 34 34 24 30 33 23 21 19 20 19 26 24 26 25 29 32 19 25 27 25 26 34 22 23 32 30 36 35 24 27 19 14 28 26 30 26 19 14 27 25 24 30 35 27 28 31 24 23 27 26 20 23 28 23 27 26 30 24 27 27 33 30 19 15 31 28 19 23 25 27 12 16 18 28 29 31 30 11 28 29 28 29 36 37 30 30 27 29 31 32 34 305152535455 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 7 85th Percentile Speeds 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemiteAve SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 284 Peds: 9/2/0 Bikes: 1/0/1 Peds: 9/1/3 Bikes: 1/0/1 Peds: 5/2/0 Bikes: 1/0/0 Peds: 12/0/3 Bikes: 21/2/3 Peds: 34/1/5 Bikes: 21/2/5 Peds: 34/1/5 Bikes: 19/2/3 Peds: 0/0/0 Bikes: 18/1/3 Peds: 5/1/1 Bikes: 0/0/0 Peds: 19/3/2 Bikes: 2/0/1 Peds: 19/1/1 Bikes: 16/1/2 Peds: 13/0/3 Bikes: 2/0/1 Peds: 7/1/1 Bikes: 1/0/1 Peds: 26/1/3 Bikes: 11/1/1 Peds: 21/1/0 Bikes: 2/0/1 Peds: 9/1/0 Bikes: 5/1/1 Peds: 2/0/0 Bikes: 1/0/0 Peds: 0/0/0 Bikes: 0/0/0 Peds: 4/0/0 Bikes: 0/0/0 Peds: 7/1/1 Bikes: 0/0/0 Peds: 33/3/3 Bikes: 1/0/1 Peds: Daily/AM Peak/PM Peak Bikes: Daily/AM Peak/PM Peak Figure 8 Existing Bicycle & Pedestrian Volumes Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 285 2042 Enter 14204 Enter 6554 46% Exit 14223 Exit 6286 44% 623 2000 421 1475 1632 4286 97 599 395 100 53 96 4512 19 82 91 218 1293 1471 15 469 322 45 36 16 12 119 22 87 50 18 5 3915 Enter 4110 29% Exit 4924 35% 29 121 148 350 687 4734 24 46 350 270 1342 1604 20 350 195 191 43 49 101 254 45 26 40 45 123 99 362 222 1271 1440 29 213 58 233 31 29 1076 780 198 179 77 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 8% 1122 909 247 164 73 13 15 994 1600 102 205 191 392 4 6 28 227 209 253 48 10 124 100 68 51 1500 1640 142 234 292 363 4 183 66 30 Enter 183 1% Exit 4 0% Enter 363 3% Exit 292 2% Enter 234 2% Exit 142 1% Enter 1640 12% Exit 1500 11% Gate D Gate C Gate B Gate ATOTAL Gate G Gate F Gate E 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 9 Existing ADTs 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemiteAve SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 286 2077 Enter 14222 Enter 6564 46% Exit 14220 Exit 6296 44% 623 2000 421 1510 1632 4296 97 599 395 100 53 96 4487 19 82 91 228 1328 1471 15 469 322 45 36 16 12 119 22 87 50 17 5 3923 Enter 4118 29% Exit 4913 35% 29 121 148 359 713 4723 24 46 350 270 1378 1604 24 370 195 191 43 49 99 256 0 0 40 45 141 106 362 222 1289 1440 32 223 60 231 25 18 1076 780 197 182 46 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 8% 1122 909 265 169 56 13 15 994 1600 106 205 184 392 4 6 28 227 208 253 48 10 124 100 68 51 1500 1640 142 234 290 363 4 183 66 30 Enter 183 1% Exit 4 0% Enter 363 3% Exit 290 2% Enter 234 2% Exit 142 1% Enter 1640 12% Exit 1500 11% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 10 ADTs with Church Road Closure 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemiteAve SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 287 1667 Enter 13997 Exit 14115 Enter 6324 45% Exit 6056 43% 428 2000 426 1300 1647 4056 97 409 410 50 53 96 4657 4 82 91 118 1138 1511 20 354 367 20 61 6 27 119 42 147 210 427 785 4173 Enter 4368 31% Exit 4913 35% 29 121 148 305 713 4723 24 46 305 270 1342 1604 355 370 195 191 43 79 114 256 0 0 40 45 8 108 347 222 1356 1440 227 223 62 231 25 18 1076 795 212 182 46 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 8% 1122 909 242 267 55 13 15 1069 1580 180 205 283 392 4 6 28 242 208 248 48 10 99 100 113 51 1540 1540 182 184 345 313 4 148 66 30 Enter 148 1% Exit 4 0% Enter 313 2% Exit 345 2% Enter 184 1% Exit 182 1% Enter 1540 11% Exit 1540 11% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 11 ADTs with Church Road Closure & Oxford St Two-Way 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemite Ave SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 288 2077 Enter 14237 Enter 6564 46% Exit 14220 Exit 6296 44% 623 2000 421 1510 1632 4296 97 599 395 100 53 96 4487 19 82 91 228 1328 1471 15 469 322 45 36 16 12 119 22 87 50 17 5 3923 Enter 4118 29% Exit 4858 34% 29 121 148 359 658 4668 24 46 350 270 1378 1604 24 315 195 191 43 49 99 236 0 0 40 45 141 111 362 222 1289 1440 42 193 75 221 30 13 1076 780 197 167 51 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 8% 1122 909 265 184 56 13 15 994 1600 116 205 229 392 4 6 28 147 143 203 48 10 134 150 193 51 1420 1640 127 249 275 378 169 168 66 30 Enter 168 1% Exit 169 1% Enter 378 3% Exit 275 2% Enter 249 2% Exit 127 1% Enter 1640 12% Exit 1420 10% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 12 ADTs with Church Road Closure & Xenwood Ave Two-Way 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemiteAve SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 289 1737 Enter 14499 Enter 6449 44% Exit 14449 Exit 6126 42% 543 2000 421 1250 1632 4126 97 519 395 80 63 96 4712 19 82 91 163 1073 1491 15 419 327 25 46 11 17 119 27 92 55 33 5 3830 Enter 4645 32% Exit 5445 38% 29 116 108 230 397 4774 19 61 310 255 1132 1619 5 180 815 672 63 119 381 589 0 0 45 85 143 309 362 222 1276 1490 69 198 218 396 43 44 1076 780 213 174 67 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 7% 1122 909 202 164 55 13 15 1029 1635 122 225 301 502 4 6 28 152 149 223 48 10 124 130 113 51 1380 1595 127 219 292 348 4 123 66 30 Enter 123 1% Exit 4 0% Enter 348 2% Exit 292 2% Enter 219 2% Exit 127 1% Enter 1595 11% Exit 1380 10% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 13 ADTs with Church Road Closure & Wooddale Ave Connection 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemite Ave SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 290 1667 Enter 13997 Enter 6324 45% Exit 14115 Exit 6056 43% 428 2000 426 1300 1647 4056 97 409 410 50 53 96 4657 4 82 91 118 1138 1511 20 354 367 20 61 6 27 119 42 147 210 427 785 4173 Enter 4368 31% Exit 4858 34% 29 121 148 305 658 4668 24 46 305 270 1342 1604 355 315 195 191 43 79 114 236 0 0 40 45 8 113 347 222 1356 1440 237 193 77 221 30 18 1076 795 212 167 51 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 8% 1122 909 242 282 55 13 15 1069 1580 190 205 328 392 4 6 28 162 143 198 48 10 109 150 253 51 1460 1540 167 199 315 328 184 118 66 30 Enter 118 1% Exit 184 1% Enter 328 2% Exit 315 2% Enter 199 1% Exit 167 1% Enter 1540 11% Exit 1460 10% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 14 ADTs with Church Road Closure & Oxford St Two-Way & Xenwood Ave Two-Way 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemiteAve SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 291 1687 Enter 14154 Enter 6349 45% Exit 14244 Exit 6076 43% 428 2000 426 1320 1647 4076 97 404 410 50 53 96 4662 4 82 91 118 1158 1511 20 354 367 20 61 6 27 119 42 147 210 358 580 4085 Enter 4495 32% Exit 5115 36% 29 121 148 322 612 4729 24 46 305 270 1345 1604 167 275 410 387 43 79 118 229 0 0 40 45 50 69 347 222 1317 1440 139 178 173 351 43 44 1076 795 213 159 67 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 8% 1122 909 197 149 55 13 15 1069 1580 177 205 271 472 4 6 28 182 149 223 48 10 99 100 113 51 1480 1540 182 184 312 343 4 123 66 30 Enter 123 1% Exit 4 0% Enter 343 2% Exit 312 2% Enter 184 1% Exit 182 1% Enter 1540 11% Exit 1480 10% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 15 ADTs with Church Road Closure & Oxford St Two-Way & Wooddale Ave Connection 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemiteAve SXewwoodAve SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 292 1737 Enter 14469 Enter 6449 45% Exit 14449 Exit 6126 42% 543 2000 421 1250 1632 4126 97 519 395 80 63 96 4712 19 82 91 163 1073 1491 15 419 327 25 46 11 17 119 27 92 55 33 5 3830 Enter 4645 32% Exit 5320 37% 29 116 108 230 397 4774 19 61 310 255 1132 1619 5 180 815 547 63 119 381 589 0 0 45 85 143 289 362 222 1276 1490 69 178 218 291 43 44 1076 780 213 174 67 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 7% 1122 909 202 154 55 13 15 1029 1635 137 205 311 412 4 6 28 142 144 173 48 10 124 160 213 51 1370 1595 132 219 282 348 144 93 66 30 Enter 93 1% Exit 144 1% Enter 348 2% Exit 282 2% Enter 219 2% Exit 132 1% Enter 1595 11% Exit 1370 9% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 16 ADTs with Church Road Closure & Xenwood Ave Two-Way & Wooddale Ave Connection 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemiteAve SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 293 1687 Enter 14149 Enter 6349 45% Exit 14269 Exit 6076 43% 428 2000 426 1320 1647 4076 97 404 410 50 53 96 4662 4 82 91 118 1158 1511 20 354 367 20 61 6 27 119 42 147 210 363 580 4095 Enter 4505 32% Exit 5060 35% 29 121 148 322 612 4739 24 46 305 270 1345 1604 167 275 410 322 43 79 118 229 0 0 40 45 50 69 347 222 1317 1440 144 178 173 286 43 44 1076 795 213 159 67 Enter 1122 8% Exit 1076 8% 1122 909 197 149 55 13 15 1069 1580 182 205 281 412 4 6 28 152 134 183 48 10 109 145 208 51 1450 1540 167 199 302 343 139 93 66 30 Enter 93 1% Exit 139 1% Enter 343 2% Exit 302 2% Enter 199 1% Exit 167 1% Enter 1540 11% Exit 1450 10% Gate E Gate F TOTAL Gate A Gate B Gate G Gate C Gate D 51 52 53 54 55 46 47 48 49 50 45 44434241 36 37 38 39 40 3533323130 25 26 27 28 34 29 2017 24232221 13 14 15 16 9 1 10 11 18 19 12 32 6 5 7 4 8 Figure 17 ADTs with Church Road Closure & Oxford St Two-Way & Xenwood Ave Two-Way & Wooddale Ave Connection 37th St W Oxford St Goodrich Ave Cambridge St 39th St W Private Road 2 Private Road 1 Colorade Ave SBrunswick Ave SAlabama Ave SZarthan Ave SYosemite Ave SXewwood Ave SWebster Ave S36th St W Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 294 Technical Memorandum To: Jack Sullivan, P.E., City of St. Louis Park From: Max Moreland, P.E. Date: December 11, 2017 Re: Elmwood Neighborhood Study – Phase 2 Purpose As part of the City of St. Louis Park’s pavement management process, street reconstruction options are being considered in the Elmwood and Brooklawns neighborhoods. As part of determining which street reconstruction options to choose, temporary traffic control modifications were placed in several locations throughout these neighborhoods for several months in late summer/early fall of 2017. This study looks at the data collected around these temporary traffic control measures before and during the deployment of the temporary traffic control measures. Based on that data, recommendations are made for which traffic control measures could be permanently installed. Conclusions & Recommendations Based on the results of this study, the following is recommended concerning traffic control changes in the Elmwood and Brooklawns neighborhoods: •The section of pavement connecting the Aldersgate United Methodist north parking lot to Wooddale Avenue be blocked. •Traffic circles be constructed at Oxford Street/Brunswick Avenue and Goodrich Avenue/Brunswick Avenue with all-way yield signs. •Traffic circles not be constructed at Goodrich Avenue/Zarthan Avenue, 39th Street/Zarthan Avenue and Brookview Drive/Brunswick Avenue. •Curb extensions be constructed at 36th Street/Alabama Avenue and 37th Street/Brunswick Avenue. •Oxford Street be converted to a two-way road between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. •All-way stop control be installed at Oxford Street/Zarthan Avenue. •A median or curb extension to discourage northbound traffic be placed on Brunswick Avenue north of Cambridge Street. Data Collection Process Data was collected by Spack Consulting at 63 locations in March and April 2017 in the Elmwood neighborhood before temporary traffic control modifications were made. This data is referred to as Phase 1 data. This included 55 road segments where vehicle volume, speed and classification data was collected and eight intersections where turning volumes, including bicycle and pedestrian volumes, were collected. The City of St. Louis Park also collected vehicle volume, speed and classification data on seven road segments in the Brooklawns neighborhood in the summer of 2017. The data collected in Phase 1 helped to inform the temporary traffic control measures to be implemented. Eleven temporary traffic control modifications were made in late August 2017 and removed in early November 2017. These temporary traffic control modifications included: •Blocking the section of pavement connecting the Aldersgate United Methodist parking lot to the Cambridge Street/Wooddale Avenue intersection. Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 295 •Traffic circles at Oxford Street/Brunswick Avenue, Goodrich Avenue/Brunswick Avenue, Goodrich Avenue/Zarthan Avenue, 39th Street/Zarthan Avenue and Brookview Drive/Brunswick Avenue. •A median was placed on Brunswick Avenue north of Cambridge Street. •All-way stop was included at Oxford Street/Zarthan Avenue. •Oxford Street was converted to a two-way road between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. •Curb extensions were placed at 36th Street/Alabama Avenue and 37th Street/Brunswick Avenue. A map is attached showing the type and location of each of these modifications. To be able to determine the impacts of these modifications on the traffic in the area, two rounds of data collection were completed. The first round, known as Phase 2 Round 1, was completed in September and October of 2017. The second round, known as Phase 2 Round 2, was completed in October and November of 2017. Both of these rounds included 48-hours of weekday data collection at 62 locations: 57 road segments where vehicle volume, speed and classification data was collected and four intersections where turning volumes, including bicycle and pedestrian volumes, were collected. The vehicle volume, speed and classification counts on road segments were completed using pneumatic tube counters and the turning movement counts were completed using video based counting software. A map is attached showing the locations of this data collection. The collected data is attached. The volume, speed and classification data is shown in tables listing the average of the 48-hours collected for each day for Phase 1, Phase 2 Round 1 and Phase 2 Round 2. An average of the Phase 2 periods is also included. The turning movement count data for Phase 2 Round 1 and Phase 2 Round 2 is also attached. An additional batch of data was collected to focus on stop sign compliance at traffic circles with stop signs. The locations data was collected was at the 39th Street/Zarthan Avenue, Oxford Street/Brunswick Avenue and Zarthan Avenue/Goodrich Avenue intersections. This data looked at the peak hours on two different days and focused on how many vehicles would stop on the approach to the intersection and how many would yield. Analysis - Goals The data collected during the Phase 2 rounds of data collection were compared against the data collected in Phase 1 to see the impacts of the temporary traffic control modifications. These comparisons can be seen in Attachment C. Benchmarks were also set before the Phase 2 data collection to determine if the temporary traffic control was successful. Those benchmarks for success include: 1.Acceptable operations at all four counted intersections. 2.Lowered vehicle speeds on Brunswick Avenue to 30 mph or less (sections 6, 11, 22, 30 and 41). 3.Lowered vehicle volumes on Private Road 2 than in Phase 1 (section 18). 4.Daily vehicle traffic volumes of less than 1,000 vehicles per day on all roads except for St. Louis Park Municipal State Aid Streets (MSAS) and Oxford Street between Alabama Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. MSAS routes are Alabama Avenue, Wooddale Avenue north of the fire station and Cambridge Street west of Alabama Avenue (sections 4, 7, 8, 12, 16, 17, 20, 23, 31, 36, 37, 42 and 51). Analysis - Intersections The first goal listed is to have all intersections studied operating at acceptable levels. To determine if they are operating at acceptable levels, capacity analyses were performed for the study intersections to determine if they need improvements such as turn lanes or an upgrade in traffic control. Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 296 The existing turning movement volumes along with the existing intersection configurations and traffic control were used to develop the average delay or 95th percentile queue lengths per intersection in each study scenario. The delay and queue calculations were done in accordance with the Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition using the Vistro software package. The full calculations for each study scenario, including Level of Service (LOS) grades and queue lengths, are included in the Appendix. Also, included in the Appendix is a guide explaining the Level of Service grade concept. Chart 1 (a.m. peak hour) and Chart 2 (p.m. peak hour) show the average peak hour delay for the all way stop sign controlled intersection of Oxford Street/Zarthan Avenue during each round of Phase 2 data collection. The LOS D/E boundary of 35 seconds of delay per vehicle is considered the threshold between acceptable and unacceptable all way stop operation in Minnesota. The LOS D/E boundary for a traffic signal controlled intersection would be 55 seconds. The Highway Capacity Manual sets the threshold lower at all-way stop signs and roundabouts then at traffic signal controlled intersections based on the theory motorists have more patience at traffic signal controlled intersections and accept longer delays at a red light. Chart 1 – A.M. Peak Hour Delays: All-Way Stop Sign Controlled Intersections Chart 2 – P.M. Peak Hour Delays: All-Way Stop Sign Controlled Intersections Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (35 seconds) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Oxford St & Zarthan AveAverage Dealy (seconds)Phase 2 Round 1 Phase 2 Round 2 Congested at LOS D/E Boundary (35 seconds) 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 Oxford St & Zarthan AveAverage Dealy (seconds)Phase 2 Round 1 Phase 2 Round 2 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 297 Chart 3 (a.m. peak hour) and Chart 4 (p.m. peak hour) show the 95th percentile queue lengths on the busiest stop sign controlled approach at intersections with side street stop sign control. Average delays are not calculated for intersections with side street stop sign control because the vast majority of vehicles going through the intersection are on the main roadway and have zero delay, which leads to low overall average delays. At side street stop sign controlled approaches to busy roadways, the average delay for all the vehicles on the approach can exceed 60 seconds. This can be the case for a few vehicles waiting at the stop sign where improvements would not be justified for the low traffic volume. Instead of reporting average approach delays like the previous charts, Charts 3 and 4 show the 95th percentile queue as the measure of effectiveness at intersections with side street stop sign control. Based on our experience, improvements are not warranted at these types of intersections until the 95th percentile queue at a stop sign is in the five to ten vehicle range. Chart 6 – A.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections Chart 7 – P.M. Peak Hour Queues: Side Street Stop Sign Controlled Intersections As shown in Charts 1 to 4, none of the study intersections are operating with excessive queues or delays which indicates all intersections are operating acceptably. These results align with the observations made in the field and with the videos of these intersections. Charts 1 to 4 also indicate that operations at the Unreasonable 95th Percentile Queue (5 Vehicles) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 36th St & Alabama Ave Oxford St & Alabama Ave Oxford St & Woodddale Ave95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Phase 2 Round 1 Phase 2 Round 2 Unreasonable 95th Percentile Queue (5 Vehicles) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 36th St & Alabama Ave Oxford St & Alabama Ave Oxford St & Woodddale Ave95th Percentile Queues (vehicles)Phase 2 Round 1 Phase 2 Round 2 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 298 study intersections were very similar between both of the Phase 2 rounds of data collection. Therefore, none of the temporary traffic control measures resulted in poor operations at these study intersections. Analysis - Speeds The second goal listed is to have the speeds on Brunswick Avenue decrease to be 30 mph or less. With Brunswick Avenue being a local road, the temporary traffic control measures along Brunswick were installed with the goal of curbing excessive speeds in mind. Reviewing the data in Attachment C, all segments of Brunswick Avenue are operating with 85th percentile vehicle at 30 mph or less in both Phase 2 scenarios. This indicates that the temporary traffic control measures along Brunswick Avenue are lowering vehicle speeds. All road segments in the study area have speed limits of 30 mph. Table 1 lists the segments that are operating with 85th percentile speeds of over 30 mph and saw an increase in speeds from Phase 1 to the average of the Phase 2 rounds of data collection. Table 1 – Speed Increases over 30 mph Road Segment Direction Road Name Location Phase 1 85th Percentile Speed Phase 2 85th Percentile Speed 7 NB Alabama Avenue Between 36th Street and Private Road 1 32 33 8 NB Wooddale Avenue Between Private Road 1 and Private Road 2 32 35 8 SB Wooddale Avenue Between Private Road 1 and Private Road 2 33 38 12 NB Alabama Avenue Between 37th Street and Oxford Street 34 35 20 NB Wooddale Avenue Between Oxford Street and Wooddale Cul-de-sac 32 33 20 SB Wooddale Avenue Between Oxford Street and Wooddale Cul-de-sac 34 35 42 NB Alabama Avenue Between Cambridge Street and 39th Street 28 31 52 NB Zarthan Avenue Between 39th Street and Excelsior Boulevard 30 32 52 SB Zarthan Avenue Between 39th Street and Excelsior Boulevard 30 32 58 SB Brunswick Avenue Between Brookview Lane and Excelsior Boulevard 31 32 As shown in Table 1, of the ten locations that had 85th percentile speed increases with the temporary traffic control measures in place, seven are on MSAS routes. Most of those seven locations were on segments that already had speeds of over 30 mph and did not have temporary traffic control measures included to address speeds at those locations. Segments 52 and 58, Zarthan Avenue and Brunswick Avenue north of Excelsior Boulevard both saw small increases in speeds over 30 mph. This suggests that the temporary traffic circles adjacent to these two locations did not have an impact in lowering the speeds at these locations. Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 299 Analysis - Volumes The third and fourth goals listed are related to vehicle volumes. The data from Phase 1 suggested that there were a number of vehicles heading into the Elmwood neighborhood using westbound Private Road 2. The data from Phase 2 shows that the eastbound and westbound volumes on Private Road 2 are much closer than they were in Phase 1. This suggests that the opening of Oxford Street to westbound traffic reduced the cut through volumes on Private Road 2 and kept more of those vehicles on public roadways. In Hennepin County, the daily volume capacities for planning purposes are: •Two-Lane Road – 15,000 vehicles per day •Three-Lane Road – 17,000 vehicles per day •Four-Lane Road – 28,000 vehicles per day The above capacities represent physical capacity in ideal roadway conditions. Research from UC Berkley, for example, indicates quality of life along a residential street is negatively impacted when the ADT exceeds 1,000 vehicles per day. Therefore, the 1,000 vehicles per day threshold is used for the capacity along neighborhood two lane roads even though its physical capacity is approximately ten to fifteen times larger. As mentioned in the fourth goal, MSAS routes are expected to have daily volumes of over 1,000 vehicles per day. The volume thresholds for these routes increase to the Hennepin County daily standards. None of the MSAS routes in the study area are close to reaching daily volume capacities. Oxford Street between Alabama Avenue and Wooddale Avenue is also expected to have daily volumes of over 1,000 vehicles when operating as a two-way roadway due to it becoming an outlet and inlet for the entire neighborhood going to/from Wooddale Avenue and/or Minnesota Trunk Highway 100. The Phase 2 daily volumes on this stretch of Oxford Street were approximately 500 vehicles between Alabama Avenue and Zarthan Avenue and approximately 1,100 vehicles between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. Approximately 75 percent of the vehicle traffic on Oxford Street between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue is eastbound traffic. If the westbound traffic were to increase to match eastbound, there would be approximately 1,600 vehicles per day which is well under the Hennepin County daily volume capacity for a two-lane road. No other road segments in the study area reached vehicle volumes of 1,000 vehicles per day. Included in the attached data is data for heavy vehicles. Heavy vehicles are classified as Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) class four and higher. This includes buses, delivery trucks, garbage trucks and any other vehicle larger than a passenger vehicle. With these types of vehicles being classified as heavy vehicles, there is expected to be some amount of heavy vehicle traffic on all roads (such as school buses, UPS trucks, furniture delivery trucks, and garbage trucks which have Tuesday service). The amounts of heavy vehicles using the local non-MSAS in the neighborhood routes are typical of local streets. Analysis – Temporary Traffic Control Measures The curb extensions at 36th Street/Alabama Avenue were included in the temporary traffic control measures to help encourage vehicles coming from the east on 36th Street to use Alabama Avenue, an MSAS route, rather than cut over to Brunswick Avenue, a local road. Additionally, the curb extensions are there to help pedestrians cross the intersection since there is less road width to cross with the extended curb area. The vehicle volumes for westbound 36th Avenue west of Alabama Avenue were shown to decrease by approximately eight percent suggesting that these curb extensions had an impact on vehicle volumes. Also, with an average of over 200 pedestrians plus bicycles per day in Phase 2 crossing either Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 300 36th Street or Alabama Avenue at this intersection, the decreased crossing width is a benefit to a significant number of users. Additionally, westbound 85th percentile speeds on 36th Avenue west of Alabama Avenue decreased to under 30 mph. Based on this, it is recommended that the curb extensions at 36th Street/Alabama Avenue be constructed. At the intersections where the temporary traffic circles that were in place, there are existing stop signs on some or all of the approaches. From the data measuring how many vehicles stopped and how many yielded at the temporary traffic circles, it was found that there was a large mix of vehicles either stopped or yielded. At an intersection, it is best to have all drivers behave consistently, so it is recommended that any traffic circles that are constructed include yield signs on all approaches and no stop signs. The curb extensions at 37th Street/Brunswick Avenue, the traffic circles at Oxford Street/Brunswick Avenue and Goodrich Avenue/Brunswick Avenue as well as the median on Brunswick Avenue north of Cambridge Avenue were included in the temporary traffic control measures to encourage traffic not needing to go on Brunswick Avenue to use Alabama Avenue as well as to help decrease speeds on Brunswick Avenue. As previously mentioned, all 85th percentile speeds on Brunswick Avenue were below 30 mph in Phase 2. Vehicle volumes on Brunswick Avenue between 37th Street and Cambridge Street dropped between approximately ten and twenty percent per block in Phase 2. Based on this, it is recommended that the four traffic control measures along Brunswick Avenue between 37th Street and Cambridge Street be constructed. To better allow for bus movements, the median on Brunswick Avenue north of Cambridge Avenue could be modified to be a curb extension as well. The two-way operations on Oxford Street between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue were included as a way to give better access to the Elmwood neighborhood as well as to help reduce westbound traffic using Private Road 2 as a cut through. As previously mentioned, the westbound traffic on Private Road 2 lowered to be closer in volume to the eastbound traffic on that stretch. Additionally, the volumes on Oxford Street when open to two-way traffic are well under capacity levels for a two-lane road. It is recommended that Oxford Street be converted to a two-way road between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. The westbound stop sign on Oxford Street at Zarthan Avenue was implemented in conjunction with the conversion of Oxford Street to a two-way road between Zarthan Avenue and Wooddale Avenue. With northbound Zarthan Avenue having a stop sign at this intersection as well as eastbound Oxford Street, not including a westbound stop sign would result in an unusual stop sign configuration at this intersection. Removing the stop sign on eastbound Oxford Street would allow for free-flow traffic on Oxford Street, but in an effort to curb cut-through traffic through the neighborhood, the stop sign on Oxford was left in place. Because of that, if Oxford Street is converted to a two-way road east of Zarthan Avenue, it is recommended that the westbound stop sign on Oxford Street be included. The traffic circle at Goodrich Avenue/Zarthan Avenue was implemented in an effort to curb significant growth in traffic through the intersection due to the opening of Oxford Street to a two-way road east of Zarthan Avenue. With Oxford Street open to westbound traffic, that led to an increase in southbound traffic on Zarthan Avenue around this intersection. Goodrich Avenue saw a decrease in traffic due to the new patterns developed by the change at Oxford Street. The traffic circles did not appear to have a significant impact on volumes outside of what would be expected due to the change on Oxford Street. It is therefore recommended that a traffic circle not be constructed at this time. If traffic significantly increase at this intersection in the future, a traffic circle could be reconsidered at that time. Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 301 The traffic circle at 39th Street/Zarthan Avenue was also implemented in an effort to curb significant growth in traffic through the intersection due to the opening of Oxford Street to a two-way road east of Zarthan Avenue. Zarthan Avenue north of 39th Street saw small increases in the number of vehicles on that roadway daily while the other three road segments surrounding the intersection saw decreases in daily traffic volumes. However, the traffic circles here also did not appear to have a significant impact on volumes outside of what would be expected due to the change on Oxford Street. Additionally, speeds on Zarthan Avenue south of 39th Street did see an increase with the traffic circle replacing the all-way stop. It is therefore recommended that a traffic circle not be constructed at this time. If traffic volumes significantly increase at this intersection in the future, a traffic circle could be reconsidered at that time. The traffic circle at Brookview Lane/Brunswick Avenue was constructed to discourage cut-through volumes from state aid routes. There was not a significant impact in the volumes on the road segments surrounding this intersection. It is therefore recommended that a traffic circle not be constructed at this time. If traffic volumes significantly increase at this intersection in the future, a traffic circle could be reconsidered at that time. Blocking the section of pavement connecting the Aldersgate United Methodist parking lot to the Cambridge Street/Wooddale Avenue intersection was done because it goes through private property that should not serve public traffic. There were very low daily volumes on this stretch of road in Phase 1. With vehicles needing to go through a private parking lot to access this stretch and two -way operations on Oxford Street giving improved access to this portion of the neighborhood, it is recommended that this stretch of pavement be blocked to public traffic. It should be noted that some vehicles were observed to use the traffic circles improperly by cutting through the intersection the wrong way when taking left turns rather than driving 3/4 of the way around the circle. Any traffic circles that are permanently constructed will need to be carefully designed to discourage vehicles from cutting across the wrong way. Attachments A.Temporary Traffic Control Changes Map B.Phase 2 Data Collection Locations Map C.Volume, Speed & Classification Data Comparisons D.Turning Movement Counts – Phase 2 Rounds 1 & 2 E.Level of Service (LOS) F.Capacity Analysis Backup Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 302 Attachment #13 – Traffic Study Phase 2 Attachments A-F Attachments D (Turning Movement Counts – Phase 2 Rounds 1 & 2) and F (Capacity Analysis Backup) were excluded from this packet due to their combined size of 140 pages. These documents can be provided by request. Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 303 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 304 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 305 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 306 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 307 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 308 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 309 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 310 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project UpdatePage 311 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 312 Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 313 36TH S T W 37TH ST W ALABAMA AVE SBRUNSWICK AVE SPRIVATE RD 0 100 20050 Feet ´ Proposed Parking Restrictions 10/26/17 Legend No Parking M-F 7am-6pm (Existing) Proposed No Parking Special Study Session Meeting of January 16, 2018 (Item No. 1) Title: 2018 Pavement Management Construction Project Update Page 314