Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/11/01 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA NOV. 1, 2021 The St. Louis Park City Council is meeting in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. in accordance with the most recent COVID-19 guidelines. EDA 6:20 p.m.; Regular city council meeting at 6:30 p.m. – community room (1st floor) Members of the public who want to provide comment to the city council about items on the agenda may attend the meeting in person or email comments to info@stlouispark.org by 3:30 p.m. the day of the meeting. Emailed comments will be provided to the city council at the meeting and be included in the official meeting record. Special study session immediately following city council meeting – community room (1st floor) The St. Louis Park City Council will meet in person for a special study session immediately following the regular city council meeting. Members of the public can attend the council meeting in person or watch the meeting by webstream at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17 and HD channel 859). Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports. 6:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – community room 1.Call to order 2.Roll call 3.Approval of EDA minutes 3a. EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 20, 2021 3b. EDA meeting minutes of Oct. 4, 2021 4.Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar Recommended action:**Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from agenda, or move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 4a. Accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of Sept. 25 through Oct. 22, 2021. 4b. Adopt EDA Resolution approving the installation of groundwater monitoring wells at 7015 Walker Street. 7.New business – None 6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – community room 1.Call to order 1a. Pledge of allegiance 1b. Roll call 2. Presentations – None Meeting of Nov. 1, 2021 City council agenda 3.Approval of minutes 3a. Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 3b. Study session minutes of Sept. 27, 2021 4.Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar Recommended action: **Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 4a. Accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of Sept. 25 through Oct. 22, 2021. 4b. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code related to the setting of fees. 4c.  Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-268-11 and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance vacating drainage and utility easement and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending right-of-way vacation ordinance and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 4d. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 5616 Vermont Street, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. P.I.D. 21-117-21-34-0035. 4e. Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $21,596.60 for project no. 4018-2000 Southeast Mobility with GL Contracting Inc, Contract No. 87-20. 4f. Authorize the mayor and city manager to execute the local trail connection agreement with Three Rivers Park District. 5.Boards and commissions – None 6.Public hearings 6a. Consolidated Public Hearing I.2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. II.2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. III.2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 3 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. Meeting of Nov. 1, 2021 City council agenda 6a. Consolidated Public Hearing cont. IV. 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov.15 council agenda. V. 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. VI. 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 6 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. 7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – None 8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items -- None 9. Communications – None **NOTE: The consent calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a councilmember or a member of the public, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. Immediately following the city council meeting SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – community room Discussion item 1. Smoking restrictions on restaurant/bar/distillery outdoor patio spaces St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular city council meetings are carried live on civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for video on demand replays. During the COVID-19 pandemic, agendas will be posted on Fridays on the entrance doors to city hall and on the text display on civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available after noon on Friday on the city’s website. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2525. Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Sept. 20, 2021 1. Call to order President Brausen called the meeting to order at 5:45 p.m. 2. Roll call Commissioners present: President Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, Margaret Rog, and Jake Spano Commissioners absent: none Staff present: City Manager (Ms. Keller), CFO (Ms. Schmitt), Economic Development Manager (Mr. Hunt), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Executive Director/Community Development Director (Ms. Barton), Communications and Marketing Manager (Ms. Smith) 3. Approval of minutes 3a. EDA meeting minutes of Aug. 16, 2021 It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Rog, to approve the Aug. 16, 2021, EDA meeting minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar 4a. Accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of July 24 through Aug. 27, 2021. 4b. Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-22 supporting submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Minnesota Brownfields Gap Financing Program relative to the Union Park Flats development. It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Kraft, to approve the EDA agenda as presented and the items on the consent calendar. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Reports – none 6. Old business – none Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 20, 2021 7. New business 7a. 2022 preliminary HRA levy certification EDA Resolution No. 21-23 Ms. Schmitt presented the staff report. She noted the full amount recommended is $1,517,799, which is 0.0185 of the estimated market value allowable for HRA Levy purposes. It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Harris, to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-23, authorizing the 2022 Preliminary HRA Levy. The motion passed 7-0. 7b. 2022 preliminary EDA levy certification Ms. Schmitt presented the staff report. She noted this is a new request, to go to the redevelopment fund. Commissioner Kraft stated he has concerns on transparency and clarity. He is concerned about a perception of hiding the true number of the levy increase. He added the discussion was about a 6.5% levy increase and no where was it discussed the overall impact which would be 7.8-7.9% increase. He added he has concerns about clarity, noting the uses would be for partial staff salaries and climate investment, but only commercial uses. Commissioner Kraft stated only a minority of residents will understand these issues, adding these are complex issues. He does not understand how this creates a stable funding source as an EDA levy. He stated the council sets each levy amount each year and could eliminate a levy, if warranted. He asked what the difference between the amounts having noted as an EDA levy versus as part of the general levy but pointed out he does support the amounts of the levy. He noted, however, the way to address transparency and clarity would be to enter these amounts into the general levy, making it clear this is a 7.8-7.9% increase. Commissioner Spano asked what is different about the HRA levy versus the EDA levy in the issue of transparency. Commissioner Kraft stated the city could do a better job on clarity and communicating the combined impact of those levies. He thought the impact of levies should be better explained in materials that are sent out. He stated on transparency, he would like to have the impact of the levies explained better. Commissioner Harris asked about the taxable impact to residents on an EDA levy and HRA levy, on top of the annual levy that is set. She stated she is not sure on the amount of both levies and asked for an average amount per average home. Ms. Schmitt stated the impact would be $4-5 per year per home for the HRA and $12-15 per year per home for the EDA. Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 20, 2021 Commissioner Harris stated she sees these are tools used in the city’s levy toolbox, and that the commissioners can help explain this information to residents. While she does understand Commissioner Kraft’s comments, she supported a levy at 5% and lower. However, she does support the EDA levy that helps with the city’s sustainability goals, which can be used to fund the climate action plan for commercial and residential. Commissioner Rog asked how the 7.8% figure was reached. Commissioner Kraft stated he looked at the total dollars levied proposed this year and next year. Ms. Schmitt stated staff is looking at 3 different levies, in 3 different buckets, which are not combined. Commissioner Kraft stated the impact to residents is the total amount they are being taxed. Commissioner Rog agreed with this 7.8% total tax figure and is uncomfortable adding a new levy which could be supported within the general levy and be more transparent. She stated franchise fees are a hidden tax as well. She noted no new levy should be started this year, and while she supports the goals of the EDA levy, this levy should be added into the general fund for transparency. Commissioner Dumalag stated this is a messaging conversation about the EDA fund and how funds are separate or combined. She stated with the separate levies, the council can expressly state the priories for each year, so she is comfortable with the separate levies, but agreed there should be better messaging around this. President Brausen pointed out the table on page 3 of the packet shows clarity and transparency on the 3 levies. Commissioner Spano asked about the implications of moving the levies if there are legal or staffing impacts. Ms. Schmitt stated this has been looked at and the idea of rolling climate action into an EDA levy is more transparent. She stated the EDA levy is $500,000 and is not rolled into anything else, while being able to be called out easily. She explained the climate action funding can be moved into the general fund, adding the salaries would not be impacted initially. She noted if the preliminary EDA levy is not passed, it will be off the table for the year, adding the commission can pass the preliminary EDA levy and then not pass the final levy. Commissioner Mohamed agreed with Commissioner Kraft’s comments on messaging. She asked if Commissioner Kraft wants to pull the EDA levy off the table completely. Commissioner Kraft stated he would like to have a new line item within the general levy to include the climate action fund, for clarity purposes. Commissioner Mohamed stated she is not comfortable putting the EDA levy aside at this time. She understands the comments about messaging and transparency, but she is in favor of the levy. Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 20, 2021 President Brausen stated he is supportive of the preliminary EDA levy and as the discussions continue, the transparency and clarity will be evident for those who are listening. It was moved by Commissioner Harris, seconded by Commissioner Spano, to adopt the 2022 Preliminary EDA levy by the city council. The motion passed 5-2 (Commissioners Kraft and Rog opposed). 7c. Establishment of the Beltline Residences Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District EDA Resolution No. 21-24 and EDA Resolution No. 21-25 Mr. Hunt presented the staff report. Commissioner Harris asked what constitutes the public redevelopment costs. Mr. Hunt stated there are several costs specified under state statute for which TIF can reimburse developers. In this instance, they refer to building demolition, soil remediation and correction, and structured parking. Commissioner Harris asked who determines what is an appropriate revenue projection. Mr. Hunt stated staff works with Ehlers in analyzing development proformas to ensure they meet the required “but-for” test. Commissioner Rog stated, as noted in the past, she will be opposing the next two items. She stated she is not completely opposed to TIF, as it can be a useful tool, but has concerns that TIF is consuming an ever-larger portion of the tax base, benefiting developers but potentially creating extra costs for the community. Commissioner Rog stated TIF comes with the territory when dealing with development and the council approves it every time. She stated all systems warrant scrutiny. She stated Opus is the developer here and the affordable portion of the project comprises about 2/3 of the total of the TIF request. She continued given that only 1 in 10 of the apartments will be affordable, is this what the city wants, and is this the best bargain the city can strike. She stated given these developers’ access to resources, from a wealth disparities perspective, she questions if TIF is critical to this projects’ success and whether the city needs to forego tax revenue for that many years to get 19 affordable singles and 5 family units. She stated the city gets the money back eventually but loses out as well and forgoes significant tax revenue of about $400,000 per year, as does the county and school district. She stated these monies could be invested in climate initiatives, lowering the levy, paying down debt, and partnering with non-profits to create more affordability. She stated the city should be requiring more and be a leader like the city is in other areas. She would like a deeper dive into TIF impacts and look at other ways to achieve city goals. Commissioner Dumalag stated she will support this TIF proposal and the “but-for” is pretty unique, especially with the city’s history of being a dumping ground for others. She stated the project is compliant with inclusionary housing policies for 25 years, green Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 20, 2021 policies, and while the city’s racial equity policies are still being created regarding TIF, they are working with the city on that. She stated the community needs to know the city is thinking broadly about housing. Commissioner Kraft thanked Commissioner Rog for her comments, adding they should continue to be discussed further. He added there is another development item on the agenda tonight that is next door and similar with flood plain, and that one is complying with green policies and not asking for TIF. He asked for staff perspective on this. Mr. Hunt stated since the other project has not asked for TIF, staff has not seen their financial information or pro forma. He stated they might have lower property acquisition price, construction costs, operating costs, or different financing structure. Commissioner Mohamed agreed with Commissioner Rog on her comments. She added every time TIF comes up, there is minimal affordable housing. However, as hesitant as she is to support this, one apartment is better than nothing to her and it will help at least one family. She added though a lot of the TIF is for luxury apartments noting most of the apartments she approves of, she cannot afford to live in. She stated we may need to look at affordable housing differently than with TIF only. Commissioner Spano stated if the EDA is uncomfortable with what developers propose, then that is on the EDA. He stated the EDA sets those parameters and the developers work with that. He agreed with Commissioner Mohamed’s comments. He stated he will support this request and asked how many dollars the city has given out in TIF and how much has the city gotten back over time. Mr. Hunt stated the city’s TIF district portfolio shows over 1100% increase in market value. Commissioner Spano stated he typically looks at TIF as an investment fund that the city puts money into and that brings back a return, in order to fund more projects in the future. Commissioner Rog stated she is not criticizing staff or her colleagues or anyone’s performances but she would like to find other times to discuss her concerns outside of the approval process. Commissioner Spano stated he would like to discuss this further, compare what other cities are doing to pay for the cost of affordable housing, how they are using or not using TIF, as well as look at additional financing options to facilitate these developments. President Brausen stated he will support this TIF request. He stated the development will allow for workforce racial equity goals, create luxury and affordable units and commercial property, and follow green policies. He stated he disagreed with the characterization that the EDA always approves TIF requests. He said Ehlers carefully reviews all TIF requests before they come to the EDA and staff only presents deals that have been vetted and the EDA can support. He stated he will support this request. Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: EDA meeting minutes of Sept. 20, 2021 Commissioner Kraft stated the key question for a study session will be if this is the most cost-effective use of the city’s dollars. He stated he will support this. It was moved by Commissioner Dumalag, seconded by Commissioner Harris, to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-24, approving the establishment of the Beltline Residences Tax Increment Financing District (a redevelopment district); and to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-25, authorizing an interfund loan for advance of certain costs in connection with the Beltline Residences TIF District. The motion passed 6-1 (Commissioner Rog opposed). 7d. Redevelopment contract with Beltline Residences, LLC EDA Resolution No. 21- 26 Mr. Hunt presented the staff report. It was moved by Commissioner Dumalag, seconded by Commissioner Mohamed, to waive the reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-26, approving the redevelopment contract between the EDA and Beltline Residences, LLC. The motion passed 6-1 (Commissioner Rog opposed). 8. Communications – none 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:48 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Tim Brausen, president Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Minutes: 3b Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Oct. 4, 2021 1. Call to order President Brausen called the meeting to order at 6:20 p.m. 2. Roll call Commissioners present: President Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, Margaret Rog, and Jake Spano. Commissioners absent: None. Staff present: City Manager (Ms. Keller), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick) 3. Approval of minutes - none 4. Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar 4a. Accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of Aug. 28 through Sept. 24, 2021. 4b. • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-27 authorizing submission of a grant application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Contamination Clean-up Grant Program on behalf of the Union Park Flats redevelopment. • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-28 authorizing submission of a grant application to Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Account for Union Park Flats redevelopment. • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-29 authorizing submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Program on behalf the Union Park Flats redevelopment. 4c. • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-30 authorizing submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Program on behalf of the Rise on 7 redevelopment. • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-31 authorizing submission of a grant application to Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Account for the Rise on 7 redevelopment. 4d. • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-32 authorizing submission of a grant application to the Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) Contamination Clean-up Grant Program on behalf of the Beltline Boulevard Station redevelopment site. Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: EDA meeting minutes of October 4, 2021 • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-33 authorizing submission of a grant application to the Hennepin County Environmental Response Fund Program on behalf of the Beltline Boulevard Station redevelopment site. • Adopt EDA Resolution No. 21-34 authorizing submission of a grant application to Metropolitan Council Tax Base Revitalization Account for the Beltline Boulevard Station Site. It was moved by Commissioner Rog, seconded by Commissioner Kraft, to approve the EDA agenda as presented and the items on the consent calendar. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Reports – none 6. Old business – none 7. New business – none 8. Communications – none 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Tim Brausen, president Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Recommended action: Motion to accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of Sept. 25 through Oct. 22, 2021. Policy consideration: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA bylaws? Summary: The finance division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: EDA disbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:24:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,680.00BOCK PAUL DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE 1,680.00 15.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC 4900 EXC BLVD TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 191.25DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 446.25 1,687.16HANSON NATE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE 1,687.16 1,783.90IMAGE 360 CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,783.90 570.00JACKSON JARAD DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE 570.00 805.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 805.00 1,000.00KFI ENGINEERS DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 2,229.64MACHALEK ROB DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE 2,229.64 3,000.00PRIMACY STRATEGY GROUP LLC.DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 3,000.00 1,569.72RAHMAN, CURT DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 2 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:24:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,569.72 9,078.00RAPPAPORT FRED DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE 9,078.00 65,369.79ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB 65,369.79 49,690.00ST. LOUIS PARK EMERGENCY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 49,690.00 762.52VIG TRACY DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE 762.52 149.85WHIPPER SNAPPER LAWN SERVICE 7015 WALKER-RYNLDS WELDING LAND MAINTENANCE 374.64BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LAND MAINTENANCE 299.70MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES LAND MAINTENANCE 221.79HWY 7 & LOUISIANA LAND MAINTENANCE 149.85PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,195.83 12.42XCEL ENERGY MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES ELECTRIC SERVICE 12.42 Report Totals 140,880.23 Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 3 Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4b Executive summary Title: Installation of groundwater monitoring wells at 7015 Walker Street Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution approving the installation of groundwater monitoring wells at 7015 Walker Street. Policy consideration: Does the EDA approve of the installation of three groundwater monitoring wells on its property located at 7015 Walker Street? Summary: Environmental consulting firm GHD, has requested permission to access and install three groundwater monitoring wells on the EDA’s vacant property located at 7015 Walker Street on behalf of clients Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils Limited Partnership; successors to a former property owner of nearby 6714 Walker Street. The monitoring work is being conducted with oversight of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in association with the consulting firm’s current monitoring of 6714 Walker Street. The monitoring wells are to assist in the characterization of the groundwater hydraulics and groundwater chemistry in the area of 6714 Walker Street. GHD will work cooperatively with the EDA and will share any data collected on the 7015 Walker property. Drilling activities will be conducted by a licensed Minnesota well driller. The wells will be installed in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health Well code. The well owners will be responsible for the maintenance of the proposed wells. If, at any time, the EDA wishes to terminate the Access agreement and have the wells removed, it may request the abandonment and removal of the wells with 30 days’ notice. The wells would then be removed by GHD at its client’s expense. Financial or budget considerations: The proposed well installation, monitoring, maintenance, and eventual removal is to be performed at no expense to the EDA. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Discussion EDA resolution Prepared by: Greg Hunt, economic development manager Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director, EDA executive director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Installation of groundwater monitoring wells at 7015 Walker Street Discussion Background: Environmental consulting firm, GHD, has requested permission to access and install three groundwater monitoring wells on the EDA’s vacant property located at 7015 Walker Street (“subject property”) on behalf of clients Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils Limited Partnership; successors to a former property owner of nearby 6714 Walker Street. The monitoring work is being conducted with oversight of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) in association with the consulting firm’s current monitoring of 6714 Walker Street. The monitoring wells are to assist in the characterization of the groundwater hydraulics and groundwater chemistry in the area of 6714 Walker Street. Proposed location of groundwater monitoring wells on 7015 Walker Street Present considerations: GHD and its clients will work cooperatively with the EDA and will share any data collected on the 7015 Walker property. Drilling activities will be conducted by a licensed Minnesota well driller. The wells will be installed, maintained, and removed in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health Well code. Agreement terms: Key terms of the agreement are as follows: •The EDA grants Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils Limited Partnership (the “Grantees”) access to the Subject Property to (a) install three Monitoring Wells in the locations depicted in the photo above, in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Health’s code and requirements; (b) perform groundwater monitoring activities with oversight of the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”); and (c) maintain the Monitoring Wells (the “Permitted Activities”). 6714 Walker St 7015 Walker St Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Installation of groundwater monitoring wells at 7015 Walker Street •The Grantees will perform the Permitted Activities at its sole cost and at no cost to the EDA. •The Grantees will provide the EDA notice three business days prior to commencing the Permitted Activities. •The Grantees will own the Monitoring Wells and agree they are solely responsible for the maintenance and repair of the Monitoring Wells, and further, that they are liable for any and all damage caused to any of the Monitoring Wells or resulting from construction and/or installation of the Monitoring Wells on the Subject Property. The EDA will have no responsibility to maintain or repair the Monitoring Wells. •The Grantees will provide any data collected on the Subject Property to the EDA. •The monitoring wells on the subject property will not impact or increase water drainage on the abutting properties or cause any adverse drainage patterns or erosion to the abutting properties. •When monitoring activities are complete, the Grantees will restore any portions of the Subject Property disturbed by its contractors in connection with the Permitted Activities to a condition substantially similar to that existing before commencement of the Permitted Activities. •The Grantees agree to indemnify and hold the EDA harmless from and against all claims, demands, actions, suits, judgments, losses, damages, costs, or expenses incurred because of personal injury, property damage, civil penalties, or fines, caused by or arising from the Permitted Activities. •The EDA may terminate the Agreement at any time if the EDA needs use the Subject Property by giving the GHD and its clients thirty (30) days advance written notice. Promptly upon receipt of such notice of termination, the Grantees shall cease the Permitted Activities and restore any portions of the Subject Property disturbed in connection with the Permitted Activities to a condition substantially similar to that existing before access commenced. If the Grantees fails to do so, the EDA may restore the Subject Property and charge the cost of such restoration to the Grantees. Next steps: GHD plans to install the monitoring wells shortly after the agreement is fully executed. Economic development authority meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Installation of groundwater monitoring wells at 7015 Walker Street EDA Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution approving an agreement between the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, Daikin Applied Americas Inc., and Super Radiator Coils Limited Partnership Whereas, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) owns certain real property located at 7015 Walker Street (the “Subject Property”) in the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”); and Whereas, Daikin Applied Americas Inc. and Super Radiator Coils Limited Partnership (the “Grantees”) desire to install three monitoring wells (the “Monitoring Wells”) on the Subject Property for the purpose of assisting the Grantees in characterization of the groundwater hydraulics and groundwater chemistry in the area of an adjacent property located at 6714 Walker Street in the City; and Whereas, the Board of Commissioners of the Authority (the “Board”) has reviewed a certain agreement (the “Agreement”) between the Authority and the Grantees that details the terms and conditions to which the Authority will provide the Grantees with access to the Subject Property for the purpose of installing and maintaining the Monitoring Wells; and Whereas, the Board finds that the approval and execution of the Agreement is in the best interest of the City and its residents. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority as follows: A.The Agreement, as presented to the Board, is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the Agreement by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. B.The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Authority. C.Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority November 1, 2021 Karen Barton, executive director Tim Brausen, president Attest Melissa Kennedy, secretary Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes City council study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Sept. 13, 2021 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: none Staff present: City Manager (Ms. Keller), City Clerk (Ms. Kennedy), Interim Deputy City Manager/Director of Operations and Recreation (Ms. Walsh), Volunteer and Wellness Coordinator (Ms. Smith), Communications Manager (Ms. Smith) Guests: JC Beckstrand, Jim Brimeyer (St. Louis Park Charter Commission members); Derek Reise, Executive Director of STEP 1. Charter commission update and future considerations Commissioner Beckstrand provided an overview of the duties and responsibilities of the charter commission and updated the council on the commission’s current work to review certain sections of the charter related to interference with administration and conflicts of interest. He explained the commission authorized the creation of a subcommittee to complete the review and provide a recommendation to the commission on proposed changes. He stated the commission’s obligations are to ensure good governance through transparency and accountability to the public. He noted the commission should review the charter periodically and suggest changes, as needed, with these tenets in mind. Commissioner Brimeyer reviewed the work of the commission and subcommittee. He stated the subcommittee and the commission have spent a lot of time discussing and debating the best way to clarify certain sections of the charter to achieve the desired outcomes of greater transparency and accountability in how alleged violations of the charter are handled and to provide greater clarity to elected officials on what constitutes a conflict of interest and when it should be disclosed. Ms. Kennedy clarified that no specific amendments or language are being proposed at this time. At the last meeting of the Charter Commission the group decided it would be a good idea to get feedback from council on the main topics identified in the staff report to help provide a framework for future discussions by the commission and determine next steps. Councilmember Brausen asked how many members were on the charter commission, noting that several members had left due to relocation. Ms. Kennedy stated the commission has 15- members and confirmed there are several vacancies. She noted members of the Charter Commission are appointed by the Chief Judge of the Hennepin County District Court. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 Councilmember Harris asked how the subcommittee members were recruited. Commissioner Beckstrand stated the members were nominated by the commission. Councilmember Harris asked how the goal of promoting a highly engaged citizenry and community is connected to the review of the sections identified. Commissioner Beckstrand stated you will find this when looking broadly at the goals and general practices of charter commissions across the country. Commissioner Kraft asked if the areas of concern identified in the report arose out of the alleged violation by a former councilmember from last year or if there were some longstanding concerns. Commissioner Brimeyer stated the Charter Commission was not interested in discussing past allegation and was most concerned about the best way to handle things going forward. Commissioner Beckstrand added some of the concerns that came up reflected potential areas of weakness or lack of clarity in the charter, but the alleged violation from last year was not the sole driving factor behind initiative. Commissioner Brimeyer stated overall the commission wants to ensure that the city’s elected officials understand that they are accountable to the community and the perception of their actions matters. He noted it is important to have oversight so the public can have the ability to question if something isn’t right. Mayor Spano stated he supports the concept of third-party investigations as it relates to alleged violations of the charter, noting an extra set of eyes is not a bad thing. He explained his main concern was the potential to weaponize the charter, particularly in instances where it could be reactionary to an unpopular council decision. Commissioner Brimeyer stated the commission wanted to avoid that situation as well. Mr. Beckstrand added if a matter came in front of the charter commission for investigation, the item would still go back to council for review and adjudication. Councilmember Rog stated she is comfortable with voters being the outside body that ultimately determines who is elected and represents the city. She is uncomfortable with the idea or assumption that the city manager is not able to objectively handle alleged violations of the charter and disagrees that it is a conflict of interest for the city manager or city attorney to be involved in the process. Regarding specific conflicts of interest of council members, she stated many elected officials have expertise in various areas that intersect with their work, it does not mean that they personally benefit from that connection or have an inherent conflict. She noted background can also help them to have interest in public service and make them a better representative for the community and the initiatives they are most passionate about. Councilmember Kraft stated he will respond to the discussion questions in the packet, adding that the city manager and city attorney do not work for him personally or solely, and he does not see an issue with conflict of interest from that perspective. Regarding the issue from 2020, he did not see a problem with that process or how it was handled. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 Councilmember Kraft stated he supports updating the conflict-of-interest disclosure requirements for public officials. He added he did not see an issue with conflict-of-interest definitions and scope for public officials and is open to proposals from the commission. He stated he is not in favor of third-party investigations. He does not see anything wrong with how the investigation was handled last year and is not in favor of requiring a third-party investigation. He would like to know specifically where there was not transparency in the process or how the process did not work. Councilmember Kraft stated he does not see an issue with the question of the city attorney overseeing an investigation process for the city or with the council making the final determination about one of their colleagues. He stated he does not take an oath to any of his colleagues, a councilmember takes an oath to uphold the constitution. He stated he does not see an issue with this item. Councilmember Harris stated it would be beneficial to define what a conflict-of-interest is. She added for the disclosure requirements of conflict-of-interest, the timing should be as soon as possible. She asked for greater clarification on how a benefit is defined when determining if there is a conflict-of-interest. She stated regarding intent of section 2.08, she is uncomfortable with the charter commission having oversight of council but is comfortable with the charter commission having oversight of governance in general. She stated she is not in favor of automatic third-party investigations of alleged violations. Councilmember Mohamed stated these are all valid points and transparency and accountability are both very important for council, as well as disclosure of conflicts. She stated when the council sets up mechanisms, the concern is what will this look like in the future, and the charter will need to withstand the changes of time and not fall to human biases, especially if the commission does not represent the community racially, economically, or socially. She stated we need to make sure we ask who is in the room and who is making the decisions, and many times it is not black or brown folks making those decisions. Councilmember Dumalag stated disclosure of a conflict of interest should happen as soon as possible and she is in full support of making that as clear as possible. Related to transparency and accountability, she supports the concepts, but has concerns about who is on the charter commission, how decisions are made, and has discomfort around this in general because she would need more information to understand what the issue is that they are trying to address. Councilmember Brausen stated he is always in favor of increased transparency, however; he is not certain the current method addressing conflict-of-interest is adequate. He stated there is no specific language in front of the council that they can react to, so he would like to see options and what other cities are doing before he could discuss this further. He would also like more discussion about councilmembers non-profit activity and conflict-of-interest before making decisions. Mayor Spano stated he has dealt with these issues over the past 10 years, especially considering his regular job. He noted discussing conflicts-of-interest is very vague, adding he agrees if there is a conflict, a councilmember does have an obligation to disclose early. He noted the definitions and scope must be as clear as possible. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 Mayor Spano stated related to the first point about accountability, he does agree with having a third-party entity do an investigation if needed and pointed out other areas where this is done within the city, such as the third-party yearly audit report. He added, however, the third-party entity should report to the city manager and city attorney and work with staff. Having the charter commission oversee this is not correct as they are not elected officials and there could be conflicts-of-interest within the charter commission as well. Commissioner Beckstrand stated the commission looked at statute when discussing what a conflict is, how it should be defined and how far down the chain of connection to an elected official the definition should be applied. Councilmember Kraft asked if Mayor Spano was saying that third-party investigations should be a requirement. Mayor Spano stated no. Councilmember Kraft stated he would support a third- party investigation if it was warranted. Commissioners Beckstrand and Brimeyer thanked council for their time and feedback. 2. STEP update: current state of food access and insecurity Mr. Reise presented the report, noting it will include trends on food insecurity and poverty, especially during the pandemic. He stated trends before the pandemic show the poverty rate has decreased since 2012 in St. Louis Park, but housing costs have increased and there are many residents who can no longer afford to live here and have had to move out of the community. Mr. Reise stated STEP has pivoted toward housing during the pandemic, noting they served 1 out of 100 families in St. Louis Park with rent assistance. With this financial support for housing, many families were limited out of poverty during the pandemic. Mr. Reise stated because of the uncertainty of food insecurity, STEP is needed and this in part has fostered STEP’s expansion at this time. He added this will help with a high standard food program for the community, that can adapt with fluctuations on what is going on in the larger world. Councilmember Mohamed stated when her family first moved to the community, they relied on STEP for food, clothing, and school supplies. She noted the impacts to families and women of color and asked if STEP has a system in place when temporary help is done. Mr. Reise stated the majority of households that STEP serves are female only led households. He stated STEP has enough access to food and were able to get food in place when the pandemic hit. Councilmember Mohamed asked if STEP has access to a healthy variety and nutritious food. Mr. Reise stated yes, and they have worked to expand this by increased refrigeration capacity, using local retail stores, and receiving not yet expired foods. Councilmember Mohamed thanked STEP for the rental assistance, adding she has referred many to them during the pandemic. She asked about evictions and noted at times the judicial City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 discretion does not protect renters. Mr. Reise noted Minnesota is in a much stronger place than other states related to evictions, so he has not seen any increase or decrease during the pandemic related to evictions. Councilmember Harris noted STEPs shifting emphasis during the pandemic with renter assistance and asked if this program will end this fall. Mr. Reise stated he is not aware of this, adding that many funds have not yet been distributed. Councilmember Harris asked how many have asked for housing assistance and if the funds stop down the road, what other type of assistance will be available through STEP. Mr. Reise stated this is an unknown at this time. He stated they are getting inquiries from 3-4 families per month, adding these federal funds are for pandemic related hardships only. Councilmember Harris asked if there any gaps in what STEP is able to provide. Mr. Reise stated the biggest gaps are related to specific emergencies related to housing and rent increases. He added transportation is another issue that STEP is not able to help with and can only provide temporary bus cards. Councilmember Rog stated she works for a non-profit that provides food and had noted food needs decline here as well. She noted undocumented families are not eligible for benefits and asked if Mr. Reise is seeing any issues related to this. Mr. Reise stated they do not ask for documentation, but noted these families are still receiving STEP services, and in deeper ways than others. Councilmember Rog asked how the council can be responsive and supportive here. Mr. Reise stated the city’s funding of the STEP housing program has helped in the past. He noted the federal government did loosen the requirements here for undocumented families, so STEP has been able to serve those families. He noted when there is great federal support for pandemic issues, there is an equity concern due to lack of funds. Councilmember Rog asked if MNSURE navigators are at STEP to help families get health insurance. Mr. Reise stated no, adding they do not have the capacity to do the training for this. He stated however they do point families to the insurance program and stated they have not seen a huge demand for this type of assistance at STEP. Councilmember Rog noted in the past, STEP has discussed the idea of having a multi-service center to be in partnership with the schools and city and asked if this is still being looked at. Mr. Reise stated STEP has pivoted from that approach and currently looking to expand providing the resources they do provide, by themselves. He added community partnerships are very valuable with the city and schools, but there are ways to do this without the physical requirements of a multi-service center. Councilmember Rog asked how much the city currently allocates to STEP annually. Mr. Reise stated STEP receives funds from the city in 3 ways: an annual amount of support at $47,000; a specific amount for family housing security at $65,000; and indirect funding with the housing authority. He added they also received federal funding through the housing authority. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 Councilmember Rog stated there are other federal funds available now and she wondered if STEP is looking at leveraging these funds for equipment or other items. Mr. Reise stated most of the federal funds available are for programs, and ARPA funds can be used for some capital improvements such as HVAC. Councilmember Rog asked how the city can engage in discovery with STEP, such as childcare, transportation and jobs, and if this is an appropriate relationship for the city and STEP to engage in. Mr. Reise stated STEP is very willing to partner with the city on these initiatives. Councilmember Rog stated the more data they have and awareness, the more help can be provided, and encouraged the conversations to be ongoing. Councilmember Kraft asked what STEPs biggest areas of concerns or risk are at this time. Mr. Reise stated that is housing and helping to make the city a place that can continue to provide housing for all. He added this a short- and long-term concern that continues to happen. Councilmember Kraft asked what the biggest areas of food insecurity in St. Louis Park are. Mr. Reise stated his concerns are that STEP is the largest entity doing this work in the city and he wants to be sure STEP continues to be accessible, adding there is always room for improvement. Councilmember Dumalag asked if there is any racial or age demographic information that can be shared. Mr. Reise stated 40% are under 18, 15% are over 65, and that has been consistent over the years. He added racially the numbers correspond with racial breakdowns of those living in poverty within the city. He stated 35-40% are African American, 20% identify as multiracial, and 20-25% are Hispanic. Councilmember Dumalag asked about household income or AMI. Mr. Reise stated about 91% of families served by STEP are under the poverty line and 100% are less than 185% of poverty. Councilmember Dumalag asked if STEP has an endowment. Mr. Reise stated they have a board- created endowment at $400,000 approximately. Councilmember Dumalag stated it can be exciting to do a capital campaign, but she is always concerned about operating and an entity being able to run in the future and she is glad there is support here. Councilmember Brausen asked if groceries are being delivered. Mr. Reise stated yes to about 50 families per month. He thanked Mr. Reise for all the work that STEP does. Councilmember Harris noted she has volunteered at STEP in the past and asked if folks need to work with the social worker when coming in for food. Mr. Reise stated yes there is an appointment system, but on Tuesday or Thursday afternoons families can come to pick up a pre-packed bag of fruits, vegetables, frozen meats, milk, eggs, and bread. He stated this is publicized with folks already in the system and social media. Councilmember Harris asked for this information to be shared with the council so members can help with promotion. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 7 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 Mayor Spano thanked Mr. Reise for all the work STEP does. He noted STEP’s facilities are noted for future council discussions. He noted the earlier discussion on rent increases for low-income families and stated there is a larger population that STEP serves that is deep and broad and the city is blessed to have STEP there to serve those needs. Councilmember Brausen asked for the timeline with the building will be completed. Mr. Reise stated the tenant in the building has now left, and STEP is working to raise funds to expand and remodel the building, adding it will take some time for this. Councilmember Rog stated there is a plan to discuss food security again but wanted to confirm STEP does not feel there is a shortage of healthy food in the community. Mr. Reise stated there is not a shortage of healthy food, but there might be some access issues. Councilmember Rog stated access continues to be a challenge and asked what the challenges are. Mr. Reise stated improvement of cultural competencies and engaging in racial equity work as a community and being responsive to all people’s needs. Councilmember Rog noted that Seeds Feeds is not competition for STEP and asked if there is synergy between the two organizations. Mr. Reise stated STEP has partnered with Seeds Feeds and connected clients with their cooking and nutrition programs and helped with food distribution. He stated these are areas they can complement each other and help folks with accessibility to both programs. Councilmember Harris stated some folks feel there is a stigma in signing up for STEP and noted the partnership with Seeds Feeds can help with residents reaching out for help, while addressing access needs. 3. Future study session agenda planning and prioritization Councilmember Harris referenced the Sept. 27 agenda and the topic “Transportation Commission.” Ms. Keller stated there was an error in timeline for this item and noted there are several upcoming study session items that will be combined. Staff will bring a proposal to council and look at a systems approach. Councilmember Harris asked if this topic will come up before the end of the year, since she will not be on council. Ms. Keller stated this would be taken into consideration. Councilmember Kraft asked if a prioritization can be done. Ms. Keller stated that would be helpful as well. Councilmember Rog asked if food security will be discussed again independent of STEP. Ms. Keller stated a discussion around food security, a potential task force and facilities will all be discussed at the same time. Councilmembers Kraft and Dumalag discussed a study session discussion proposal related to limiting outdoor smoking on patios and looking at a policy decision. Councilmember Kraft stated there is an equity issue in that employees do not have the option of leaving a very smoke-filled area. Councilmember Dumalag stated there is no distinction between smoking and non-smoking areas on these outdoor patios at this time within the city. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 8 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 Councilmember Mohamed stated she is in support of this and would like more discussion. Mayor Spano stated he is not supportive of the discussion. Councilmember Brausen supports the discussion and asked for information on how many properties are involved. Councilmember Harris stated she hesitates restriction of the patio areas for smokers but is open to talking about this and would like to look at data points. Mayor Spano stated we have no restrictions currently, he is not clear on the discussion points yet, and is concerned about heading down another path of issues. He directed staff to prepare the discussion for a future council study session. Mayor Spano noted a discussion on land acknowledgement and if there was interest in this. He stated once this is more firm, council can look further at this for a study session discussion. Communications/meeting check-in (verbal) Discussion on written reports Councilmember Rog noted she prefers the sidewalk report be a discussion. Ms. Keller asked if this was a future study session topic. Mayor Spano stated it is on the list for discussion. Councilmember Rog stated she would like to spend more time on this with a discussion soon. Councilmember Kraft agreed there needs to be discussion on the sidewalk topic and asked if it could it be added to the Sept. 27, 2021, study session. Councilmember Brausen stated he would like robust community discussion on this topic. Mayor Spano stated he is not opposed to discussing this, but there are other priorities. Ms. Keller stated there appears to be a need to look at priorities and discussion process again, and staff will come back with a proposal to council. She stated she will discuss with staff to see if this discussion can come back to council at the Sept. 27, 2021, study session. Councilmember Harris asked about the MSA funds written report and asked if a discussion can happen around this topic. Ms. Keller stated if there is interest to discuss the scope, the timeline is close now. Councilmember Harris stated she is interested if there will be impacts on the scope that would affect the tax levy. She noted the price can go down from the maximum noted in the report, so therefore she is not interested in changing the scope. Councilmember Kraft agreed. Councilmember Rog added she is not interested in reducing costs either because she does not want more on-street buffered bike lanes. She stated she is supportive of the cycle tracks. Mayor Spano stated the report did not address anything that was not Louisiana Avenue for the bike structure. He noted dedicated and separate makes sense but again, staff should be looking for options that are not on the busiest roads. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 9 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 13, 2021 Councilmember Brausen stated option 2 might work and he is interested in hearing how the bollards work. He is also supportive of this as the best possible product for the community. Mayor Spano stated related to the American Recovery Plan report, he is not sure if staff works on grants and asked if there is a way for Minneapolis to support a regional effort on this. Councilmember Kraft stated the Just Deeds update is largely symbolic and should be linked to historical housing discrimination issues, within zoning, and so it can be tied into community support. Mayor Spano added he has discussed with the city attorney using his home as an educational piece related to Just Deeds. Councilmember Rog noted this Saturday is “Minnesothai” at Wat Prom temple and Mayor Spano will make a presentation. The event is from 11 a.m. to 8 p.m. She encouraged folks to bike or park at Beth-El Synagogue and walk on the bridge. Ms. Keller stated Fire Station #1 is having an open house event on Friday from 4:30-7:30 p.m. Mayor Spano stated on Friday there was a threat of violence against Beth-El and he wanted to thank police and the swift response from the Jewish community to make sure the word got out related to this anti-Semitic threat. He thanked all those involved. The meeting adjourned at 9:31 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 4 Just Dees update 5. Neighborhood and community sidewalk designation 6. 2022 preliminary property tax levy certification 7. American Recovery Plan Act 8. Municipal State Aid road project scope ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Minutes: 3b Unofficial minutes City council study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota Sept. 27, 2021 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed. Councilmembers absent: Margaret Rog Staff present: City Manager (Ms. Keller), Director of Building and Energy (Mr. Hoffman), Solid Waste Manager (Ms. Fisher), City Clerk (Melissa Kennedy), CFO (Ms. Schmitt), Finance Manager (Ms. Sledge), Billing Supervisor (Ms. Weller), Communications and Marketing Manager (Ms. Smith) Guests: Jim Lawrence, MAC Commissioner; Dana Nelson, Director of Stakeholder Engagement, MAC, Stacy Kvilvang, Ehlers. 1. Introduction of MAC Commissioner Jim Lawrence Councilmember Dumalag disclosed that the MAC is a client of her workplace. Mr. Lawrence introduced himself and reviewed his background. He noted he was appointed earlier this year by Governor Walz as MAC commissioner. He stated he represents St. Louis Park and is available to answer any questions of the council. Mayor Spano stated the noise mitigation program is funded by purchased airline tickets, asking if that was correct. Ms. Nelson stated it is funded through airport generated revenues. Mayor Spano asked how the current noise mitigation plan may have changed over the last year. Ms. Nelson stated the current program sunsets in 2024 and it is through a court-ordered agreement set up in 2005-07. It states for those to be eligible for the noise mitigation program, residents need to be within a certain area for 3 years in a row. She added in 2019 there were no new homes introduced and in 2020, because of the pandemic, there were lower operations numbers. She stated this program will not be continued. A new program is in the works and dialogue continues to present this soon. Councilmember Harris asked how residents should reach out and how the MAC can be of assistance to people. Mr. Lawrence stated residents can contact Mr. Hoffman or Ms. Nelson at the MAC. He added he is happy to be contacted as well. Councilmember Harris asked what type of topics residents ask about. Ms. Nelson stated anything about the airport, noting residents can contact the MAC by phone or email, and information is available on their website. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 27, 2021 Councilmember Harris noted occasionally she does receive residents noting loud plane noise in their neighborhoods. She asked what suggestions can be given to residents for working on their homes to help mitigate noise. Ms. Nelson stated the MAC can provide contact information for contractors and the website also provides an interactive flight tracker tool about changes that occur related to flight traffic. Mr. Lawrence added planes will get quieter over time, not noisier, as the older planes are going out of service. Councilmember Kraft referenced the city’s strategic priorities especially the climate action plan and noted air travel is included in the greenhouse gas plans for the area and reducing carbon emissions. He asked if the MAC has a climate action plan or any strategic plans on greenhouse gases or sustainability. Mr. Lawrence noted he has discussed the city’s climate action plan with Mr. Hoffman. He complimented the city for their work on climate action and noted as planes get less noisy, they will also lower their carbon footprint. He stated airlines are very conscious of climate change and have plans in place. Ms. Nelson stated the sustainability plan has 4 goals for 2030. She stated the MAC emissions goal is to reduce carbon emissions by 80% by 2030 at the MSP campus. She added this does not include specific airline emissions but noted there will be movement in that area as airlines change the fuels used. She stated solar panels on top of the airport parking structures at terminals 1 and 2 are part of this plan, along with capability to extend this. She added they did update support equipment at the airport to electric, as well as an overhaul of their HVAC controls. She stated they have a way to go to hit 80% at the MSP campus but are working on how to include these measures into their capital improvement plans. 2. 2022 utility rate study Ms. Kvilvang presented the report. Ms. Kvilvang noted the recommendations of rate increases as follows: • Water 4.5% annually • Sanitary sewer 3.5% annually • Storm sewer 6.0% annually • Sanitation 5.25% annually – and continue phase out of the 20-gallon container Councilmember Dumalag asked if this is an annual increase over the previous year. Ms. Kvilvang stated yes. Councilmember Dumalag asked if the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District is its own taxable entity versus Bass Creek and if the pass through is just to the residents living in that district. Ms. Weller confirmed it was for residents living in that area. Councilmember Kraft asked if the council is only looking to see if these criteria meet our conservation goals and what are the city’s conservation goals. Ms. Kvilvang stated to not penalize low users and noted that higher users would be pushed into a higher tier, which would increase the irrigation rate, to encourage conservation. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 27, 2021 Councilmember Kraft asked what the irrigation percentage is. Ms. Kvilvang stated irrigation pays a higher rate. She noted the goal was to separate this out and then charge at a higher rate for water usage. Councilmember Kraft asked what is meant by ‘tiers are working as designed.’ Ms. Kvilvang stated meeting the goal of not penalizing the lower users and charging the higher users more for their use shows that the tiers system is working as designed. Councilmember Kraft asked what was meant by ‘the capital improvement plan is aggressive.’ Ms. Kvilvang stated it is aggressive and complete and a detailed plan, with replacements made as needed as per staff recommendations. She noted an example of this is as the city is doing pavement management and roads are dug up, utilities are replaced during that timeframe, which is efficient. Councilmember Kraft asked about storm sewer and why there are big jumps in ending cash. Ms. Kvilvang stated this is cash building up for rate increases, noting it is such a small fund, the jumps seem exaggerated. Councilmember Kraft stated the concern he has on the policy question is that the low user is being penalized. Councilmember Harris agreed. Ms. Kvilvang stated most customers will not fill the 20-gallon container every week. Councilmember Kraft stated the policy does not meet the goals especially in the sanitation area. Additionally, in the multi-family and in commercial, it seems to be a lower cost in the commercial area. He noted the residential user pays more over time versus the commercial user. Councilmember Brausen stated it is a higher percentage increase, but they start at lower rates. Ms. Kvilvang stated they are paying for what they are using, so it evens out. Councilmember Mohamed asked about the 6.7% increase. Ms. Kvilvang stated that is the year over year increase. Councilmember Mohamed asked if residential will pay less because of the irrigation. Ms. Kvilvang stated yes. Councilmember Mohamed stated on the policy consideration she believes the city is meeting the goals as presented. Councilmember Harris asked which fund is not meeting the goals right now. Ms. Kvilvang stated the water fund. She stated the city wants to have 3 months operating expenses, next year’s debt service and all capital plans and cash in reserve in case a problem arises with a utility. Councilmember Brausen asked if this is a straight user fee of costs for the city providing services. Ms. Kvilvang stated yes. Councilmember Brausen stated the council decided to increase the rates on irrigation, such as golf courses or large lawns, to discourage too much water usage. He supports the tiered rate structure the city uses and noted it accomplishes what it sets out to do. He hopes to see the costs go down at some point, adding he would not be averse to increasing irrigation costs. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 27, 2021 Councilmember Brausen stated he is happy about the 30-gallon container and every other week pick up, adding it is the most used. He asked about commercial solid waste and noted the residents seemed to pay more if at 90 gallons or more. He noted higher rates might encourage them to recycle more. Councilmember Brausen asked if Waste Management does all the commercial collection or if they use independent companies. Ms. Kvilvang stated commercial can opt out of the city waste vendors. She added commercial users also have more of an ala carte program to work from, so it is hard to compare apples to apples. Councilmember Brausen asked if Waste Management does any type of survey or data about how full the containers are when emptied. Ms. Fisher stated Waste Management does provide limited services to commercial, and they do not provide data and is not something the city requires under the contract. Mayor Spano stated most folks will move to the 30 gallon and every other week rates. He also noted the tiering system does not seem to be reducing people’s water usage. Ms. Kvilvang stated that is correct. Mayor Spano stated this may then need to be revisited if it is not working to help water conservation. Mayor Spano noted he did not know that irrigation systems used different water meters. He added the city has a requirement that projects have dedicated green space, and then the city requires it to be irrigated. So, we might need to look at this further in the future. Councilmember Kraft agreed with Mayor Spano’s comments and with adding to the irrigation fees to benefit the low users. He stated with the green space, the level of maintenance and watering depends on what is being planted in those areas such as Kentucky Blue grass versus native plantings. Councilmember Brausen stated that would require a policy decision on discouraging use of water and that would warrant a discussion with residents. He stated he would be interested in this and would want to ask the city attorney for an opinion as well. 3. Update on council-requested agenda items/topics Ms. Kennedy presented the report to council and asked if the council supports the use of a systems approach to manage council-requested items. Councilmember Harris stated she likes the concept. She asked if the process council uses to request new items would change. Ms. Kennedy stated that would be addressed in a subsequent phase, noting staff will work through the entire process and bring back suggestions in a future discussion with council. She noted the first step in the process is to make sure council is ok with the systems approach. Councilmember Harris stated she supports the approach being taken. Mayor Spano asked how topics will be included in study sessions. Ms. Kennedy stated many of the items on the existing list are more substantive topics, adding she would envision putting City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 5 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 27, 2021 several topics together on one agenda or across several meetings to allow for more meaningful and thoughtful discussion by council. Councilmember Kraft noted a specific line from the staff report, ‘the current method is not achieving desired outcomes for staff or council’ and asked what that means from a staff perspective and from councils’ perspective. Ms. Kennedy stated there are a lot of items and it has become difficult to track the status of items for both council and staff and at times there is confusion on the work being done on certain topics and how items are prioritized. She added staff will work on developing a tool with a timeline element that would allow council to better track the status of their items on an ongoing basis and understand other needs and variables that may be involved. Councilmember Kraft stated he is supportive of this and would want prioritization to be more clarified. Ms. Kennedy agreed, noting staff can provide more support for council in this area going forward. Councilmember Dumalag appreciated the direction of the process and the buckets of topics. She also appreciates the items were being categorized to align with the council’s strategic priorities. Councilmember Brausen stated he is also in support of a systems approach, noting it would be nice to get to some of the items that have been on the list for a while. Councilmember Harris stated there are many items on the list that were proposed a long time ago and asked how it is determined when items are brought forward. Ms. Kennedy stated there are many factors that go into determining when an item is brought forward, such as capacity and readiness. She explained there are items and projects that come up over time that may be more urgent and need immediate time and attention, such as the city’s pandemic response efforts. Ultimately it is up to the city manager to determine how and when items are scheduled. She noted the council will also need to think about and be aware of capacity to manage their requested items because they are in addition to the standard line of business items that also need to be completed. Mayor Spano stated there are items that might not be relevant any longer and can be removed, and staff can identify them. Ms. Kennedy stated that would be a helpful exercise and staff could work on that prior to the next discussion with council. She added staff will also be thinking about how they can help council be more efficient, so everyone has the information needed. Ms. Keller stated it will be difficult to address all the topics on the current list in the remaining three months left in the year, but she wanted to point out she is aware of the history of some of the items and how long they have been outstanding. Ms. Keller thanked Ms. Kennedy for her work on this project. She reiterated phase 1 of the project is addressing the backlog of items and then setting up a more efficient system that will work for both council and staff going forward. She appreciates the spirit of experimentation and is looking forward to partnering on it. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 6 Title: Study session minutes of Sept. 27, 2021 4. Future study session agenda planning and prioritization Councilmember Brausen asked about the idling report being addressed here versus being discussed as a sustainability item. Ms. Kennedy stated yes, staff had already prepared and scheduled this item for discussion, so it was kept on the current schedule. Communications/meeting check-in (verbal) Ms. Keller stated a mailing will be going to residents about yard waste collection and going back to weekly collection. She thanked residents for their patience on this as Waste Management hired more drivers. Ms. Keller noted an award planning staff received from Success Stories and Implementation for work on the Historic Walker District revitalization plan and an innovation and planning award around the speed limit work. Councilmember Harris stated the Louisiana Bridge will be completed and reopened on Oct. 18, 2021. Councilmember Brausen referenced the green building policy report and asked if a car dealership is proposing to rebuild one of their buildings, and since it is a CUP, can they be asked to install solar or adhere to sustainability policies. Ms. Keller stated there may be some limitations since it is a CUP and not a full rebuild. She stated she will contact the city attorney for further information. The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 5. August 2021 monthly financial report 6. Update on revised green building policy ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Approval of city disbursements Recommended action: Motion to accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of Sept. 25 through Oct. 22, 2021. Policy consideration: Does the city council desire to approve city disbursements in accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter? Summary: The finance division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the city council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the city’s charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: City disbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 591.85 ABSOLUTE MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 591.85 300.00 SAHRA QAXIYE PHOTOGRAPHY WESTWOOD G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 300.00 250.00 VOLK RENEE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 228.003SI SECURITY SYSTEMS INC POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 228.00 45.504 FRONT ENERGY SOLUTIONS BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 45.50 192.50AAA LAMBERTS LANDSCAPE PRODUCT SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 192.50 225.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 900.00ADS ON BOARDS REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 900.00 361.40AIRTECH INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 361.40 579.00ALL CITY ELEVATOR INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 579.00 143.00ALLAN MECHANICAL, INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 143.00 15,717.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 15,717.00 11,135.03ALLIANT INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 11,135.03 2,664.20ALLSTREAMIT G & A TELEPHONE 2,664.20 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 2 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 32.49ALSHARIT AHMED WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 32.49 349.15AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 105.46POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 227.40POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 50.24POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 20.35POLICE G & A COMPUTER SUPPLIES 9.99POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT PARTS 304.97POLICE GRANTS & E-911BUDGET POLICE EQUIPMENT 123.92E-911 PROGRAM OFFICE EQUIPMENT 25.58CABLE TV G & A OTHER 59.99POLICEMACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 105.93TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,382.98 476.00AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,487.00PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,070.00PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,632.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 340.00SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 680.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,730.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 19,415.00 1,350.00AMERICAN LEAK DETECTION AQUATIC PARK G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,350.00AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,700.00 476.00AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 476.00 102.52ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 627.90TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 730.42 2,049.03ARCADIS US., INC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,049.03 935.68ARCHITECT MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 3 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 935.68 .45ARTISTIC PLUMBING, INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 80.75BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 81.20 6,000.00ASAP UNDERGROUND SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,000.00 2,455.00ASET SUPPLY AND PAPER INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 35,075.04SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 37,530.04 2,280.54ASPEN MILLS FIRE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 2,280.54 315.25ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 315.25 680.00AT YOUTH PROGRAMS LLC.TENNIS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 680.00 621.92ATOMIC RECYCLING VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 621.92 144.00AUSCO DESIGN & MARKETING BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 144.00 210.00AUTOWASH SYSTEMS INC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 210.00 537.99AVI SYSTEMS INC CABLE TV G & A REPAIRS 537.99 8,370.00AVOLVE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 8,370.00 750.00AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.POLICE G & A TRAINING 50,000.00POLICEMACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 50,750.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 4 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 55.25B & C PLUMBING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 55.25 24.38B&K ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 24.38 4,132.07BACHMANSTREE REPLACEMENT TREE REPLACEMENT 4,132.07 300.00BACKOUS MICHELLE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 300.00 314.34BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 314.34 121.99BARNES DRISCOLL ERIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 121.99 201.64BARRETT PATRICIA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 201.64 660.00BARTLEY SALES CO PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 660.00 140.00BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 140.00 152.06BARTSCH, NANCY & SCOTT REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 152.06 71.13BENNIS CAROLINE BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 71.13 197.39BEST CLEANERS, INC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 197.39 55.25BEYOND HEATING AND AIR, LLC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 55.25 335.00BIGHAM ERIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 335.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 5 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 138.13BINDER HEATING AND AIR, INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 138.13 1,673.19BLACKBURN MFG. CO WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,673.19 180.00BLACKFIRE CREATIVE POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 180.00 10,000.00BOCHARNIKOV ALEXANDER ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 10,000.00 43.42BOLK PATSY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 43.42 23,101.69BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 841.34PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 819.94WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,551.89SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,124.64STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 34,439.50 46,106.00BORMANN CONSTRUCTION INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 46,106.00 284.38BOSS GARY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 284.38 1,518.78BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,518.78 5,021.10BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,385.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,406.10 241.93BREDEMUS HARDWARE COMPANY INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 10,928.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 11,169.93 1,400.00BROOKSIDE MINNOCO PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 6 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,400.00 711.82BROWNDALE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 711.82 255.28BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ALLEY MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 255.28 61.21BURCH MARY WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.21 510.00BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION COMMUNICATIONS/DISPATCH TELEPHONE 510.00 118.63BURNOMATIC, MOONEY, AND RIDLER BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 118.63 280.00BUSBOOM MARY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 280.00 703.78BUSINESS ESSENTIALS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 194.42COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 898.20 56,016.00CALGON CARBON CORP REILLY G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 56,016.00 287.10CANON FINANCIAL IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 287.10 4,166.00CARE RESOURCE CONNECTION FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,166.00 48,942.20CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 48,942.20 5,224.50CBIZ BENEFITS & INSURANCE SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,224.50 962.88CDW GOVERNMENT INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 10.61-CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 7 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 952.27 1,500.00CENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,750.00DOWN PYMT ASSISTANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,250.00 60.00CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DOWN PYMT ASSISTANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 60.00 8,250.00CENTER POINT ENERGY STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL 8,250.00 332.40CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A HEATING GAS 95.21-FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 593.01WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 33.70REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 260.96SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 238.05PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 10,099.91REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS 11,462.82 12.75CENTRAL MCGOWAN CONCESSIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 12.75 5,440.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT OTHER RETIREMENT 5,440.00 5,250.00CENTRAL SQUARE POLICE OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,250.00 26,236.54CENTURY LINK E-911 PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 329.04CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 26,565.58 750.00CHECHIK JOEL SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 750.00 150.00CHEF MARSHALL O'BRIEN LLC FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 150.00 49.93CHEMAK CHARLES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 8 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 49.93 .94CHERRY PLUMBING BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 97.81BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 98.75 250.59CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 238.02FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 279.39VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 768.00 396.50CITIES 1 PLUMBING AND HEATING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 396.50 32.62CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 16.07GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT 121.50ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 934.74RACE EQUITY & INCLUSION G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 21.90HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 358.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 100.00HUMAN RESOURCES CONNECTION CREW 169.00HUMAN RESOURCES SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 365.00COMM & MARKETING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,417.50IT G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 158.70IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 1,236.50ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 204.00ASSESSING G & A LICENSES 150.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 230.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 15.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 64.82POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 85.97POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 245.72POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 24.99POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,061.19POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 145.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 88.95POLICE G & A TRAINING 739.98POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 92.24POLICE G & A LICENSES 15.25-FIRE OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,282.69FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 9 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 793.94FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 660.84FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,696.72FIRE OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 176.24FIRE OPERATIONS REPAIRS 13.97FIRE OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 25.00FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 555.19FIRE OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 134.24BLDG & ENERGY G & A TRAINING 233.49PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 680.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TRAINING 210.00TRAININGTRAINING 499.00TRAININGSEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 397.36CABLE TV G & A OTHER 171.84WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 179.96WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 330.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 210.00WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 113.94SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER 95.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 1,069.35ORGANIZED REC G & A TRAINING 600.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 30.04SOCCERGENERAL SUPPLIES 59.98SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 188.47YOUTH PROGRAMS GENERAL SUPPLIES 639.47YOUTH PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 102.80PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 480.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 202.82PARK MAINTENANCE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 310.38BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 286.36WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 647.86REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 275.81REC CENTER BUILDING TRAINING 43.00AQUATIC PARK G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 271.12LIFEGUARDINGTRAINING CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.96CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 686.97VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 67.99VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 120.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 22,631.91 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 10 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,000.00CLARENDON PROPERTIES ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 4,000.00 40.00CLEAN RIVER RECYCLING SOLUTIONS FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 40.00 156.80COLE PAPERS FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 156.80 19,197.89COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 19,197.89 916.09COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS 916.09 128.16COMCASTFIRE OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 115.33CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.88OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 59.88REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 346.25 3,390.12COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,929.14WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 7,319.26 118.63COMMERCIAL PLUMBING AND HEATING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 118.63 1,597.16COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION SYSTEM INC REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,597.16 225.00COMPUTER INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGIES INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 225.00 6,573.95CORE & MAIN LP WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,573.95 515.00CORPORATE MECHANICAL REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 515.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 11 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 500.00COX JENNA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 500.00 182.56CROOKS, DEAN WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 182.56 45.00CROUSE, ELIZABETH SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 8.02CROWN RENTAL - BURNSVILLE PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.02 1,037.50CROWN TROPHY OF BLOOMINGTON, INC. SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,037.50 6,400.00CTM SERVICES, INC.REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 6,400.00 21.99CUB FOODS POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.94POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 47.93 3,072.50CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,085.00SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 642.50SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,050.00SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 910.00SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 860.00SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,230.00BEAUTIFICATION/LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPING SERVICE 13,850.00 164.13CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 164.13 376.73DALCO ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 75.82SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 452.55 291.67DANKWERTH MICHELLE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 291.67 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 12 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 84.74DAVIS BEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 84.74 400.00DAVIS MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC.AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 400.00 434.60DELEGARD TOOL CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 434.60 2,026.92DELTA INDUSTRIAL SERVICE & SUPPLY FIRE OPERATIONS REPAIRS 2,026.92 5,240.59DEPARTMENT OF LABOR & INDUSTRY BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 5,240.59 780.00DH ATHLETICS LLC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 780.00 50.00DITTMER DEREK ADULT PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUE 50.00 1,768.00DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 1,768.00 3,707.90DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 454.00ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 210.58STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 645.79PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 379.05WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 56.16SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,074.29SOLID WASTE G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 112.31STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,640.08 35.00DONAHUE STEPHANIE PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 35.00 99.70DRUCKER BARBARA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 99.70 300.00DTN, LLC.PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 13 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 300.00 145.96DYBEVIK SARAH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 145.96 1,106.70ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES 1,106.70 12,225.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ESCROWS KNOLLWOOD - INDIRECT SOURCE PR 9,525.00ESCROWSSATURDAY PROP (S WOOD STATION) 150.00ESCROWSSEMBLE EXCAVATING 2,100.00ESCROWS3801 WOODDALE (ALDERSGATE) 3,750.002016A GO DEBT SERV G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,750.00 80.00ELIOT VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80.00 116.13ELLINGSON, LISA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 116.13 485.13EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,060.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,545.13 5,824.10ENTERPRISE FM TRUST EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT 5,824.10 315.00ESCAPE FIRE PROTECTION LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 315.00 34.98ESTATE OF EARL G STEBNER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 34.98 1,248.00ETTEL & FRANZ ROOFING CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,248.00 2,190.00EVERLAST REHAB SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,190.00 90.00EVIDENT INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 14 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 90.00 1,183.66FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,183.66 1,997.59FASTSIGNSSPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,997.59 559.95FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 559.95 125.00FERGUSON SARA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 2,257.00FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,257.00 56.76FERNANDES BENHUR WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 56.76 38.09FERRELLGASREC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 56.80VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A MOTOR FUELS 94.89 45.00FINK ADAM SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 172.04FIRECOMFIRE OPERATIONS REPAIRS 172.04 477.87FIRST ADVANTAGE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 477.87 216.00FISHER LISA ANN FITNESS PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216.00 60.00FLARE HEATING & AIR BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 60.00 107.53FLOMO DEANNE ROC DRY FLOOR RENTAL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 107.53 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 15 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 333.50FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 333.50WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 333.50SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 333.50STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,334.00 141.23FORKLIFTS OF MN INC.PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 141.23 14.58FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.58 275.56FRATTALLONE'S/SAINT LOUIS PARK REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 275.56 75.00FREEDOM MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 75.00 156.98FREEWHEEL BIKE MINNETONKA POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 156.98 18.78GAIDA NATHAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 18.78 108.88GALAXY MECHANICAL INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 108.88 963.12GALLS, LLC - DBA UNIFORMS UNLIMITED POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 963.12 652.00GARTNER REFRIG & MFG INC REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 652.00 863.79GENERAL OFFICE PRODUCTS COMPANY FACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 863.79 45.00GERSHONE JUDAH SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 3,195.50GERTENSPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 16 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,195.50 500.00GGLEAGUES, INC.ADULT PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 108.88GILBERT MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 108.88 460.00GILLES JACKY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 460.00 40.00GLOCK PROFESSIONAL INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 40.00 1,084.05GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,084.05 418.79GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 36.27FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 102.06LOCATES/GOPHER ONE SMALL TOOLS 557.12 900.00GRANICUSCOMM & MARKETING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 900.00 356.72GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 356.72 2,749.50GREEN CARD VOICES RACE EQUITY & INCLUSION G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,749.50 85.00GREEN SARAH INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 85.00 47,798.78GUARDIAN FLEET SUPPLY CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY 47,798.78 90.16GULLIFER MEGAN INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 90.16 400.80HAAG COMPANIES INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 17 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 400.80 72.63HAHN SHAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 72.63 730.91HANSON HEATHER & DOUGLAS STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 730.91 5,000.00HARKESS EXCAVATING ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 5,000.00 25,461.92HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 25,461.92 2,594.00HEALTHPARTNERSHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 1,515.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,109.00 120.26HEARTH & HOME TECHNOLOGIES BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 120.26 800.00HEIDT MOLLY & JAMIE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 800.00 20.00HENNEPIN COUNTY COMM DEV G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 20.00 40.00HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 3,289.70HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 4,812.03POLICE G & A JAIL/DETENTION SERVICES 3,438.85FIRE OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 30.00HIA ADMIN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 906.59PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 12,477.17 125.00HENRICKSEN PSG FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 125.00 3,522.50HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 18 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,522.50 200.00HILK LEAANN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 200.00 85.00HINZ EMILY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 85.00 938.70HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 938.70 90.19HOLTZE BEVERLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 90.19 203.16HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 269.76ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.03WIRING REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 124.62LOCATES/GOPHER ONE GENERAL SUPPLIES 126.30WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 702.25WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 73.85WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 16.50ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.98LARGE EVENTS - ADMIN FEE GENERAL SUPPLIES 408.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 332.52PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 481.34PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 9.32PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,778.23 640.91HORWITZ INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 640.91 61.08HUIRAS KENNETH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 61.08 300.00HUNNICUT KYLE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 300.00 282.65HUOT SARAH WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 282.65 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 19 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 11,146.65HYDRO-KLEAN SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 164,085.30SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 175,231.95 960.00ICE SPORTS INDUSTRY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 960.00 1,549.00IDENTISYSTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,549.00 1,301.49IMPACT POWER TO CONNECT FINANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,198.62WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 3,198.63SEWER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 3,198.63SOLID WASTE G&A POSTAGE 3,198.58STORM WATER UTILITY G&A POSTAGE 14,095.95 2,319.06INDELCOWATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,319.06 360.00INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 360.00 5,000.00INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #283 REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 5,000.00 45.00INGLIS VALERIE SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 2,421.00INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,421.00 6.66I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 6.66 332.25J HAYGEN PROPERTIES LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 332.25 65.97J. H. LARSON CO.WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 65.97 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 20 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 133,492.00J.P SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION CO LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 133,492.00 183.63JAY HAWK MECHANICAL, INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 183.63 55.00J-BERD MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 1,990.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 2,045.00 81.19JERRY'S HARDWARE FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 177.66WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 22.49NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.88NATURAL RESOURCES G & A SMALL TOOLS 184.43WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 475.65 105.00JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE MPLS SEASON PASSES REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 105.00 39.95JLCBLDG & ENERGY G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 39.95 300.00JOHNSTON JUDITH ADMINISTRATION G & A NON-COMPLIANCE VIOLATIONS/FEES 300.00 324.80JP COOKE CO BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 324.80 14,200.00JUST-RITE FENCE FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 7,600.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 500.00INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS 22,300.00 1,200.00KALENBERG ABBY & JOE NESSA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,200.00 11.00KEISTER JOANNE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 11.00 175.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS 5605 W 36TH (AMER LEGION SITE) City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 21 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 175.00 37,275.00KENWOOD GYMNASTICS CENTER BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 37,275.00 287.72KEWITSCH KRIS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 287.72 1,210.00KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 6,242.60STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 7,452.60 6,200.00KLM ENGINEERING INC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 6,200.00 118.75KOLINSKI JORDAN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 118.75 690.00KONECRANESVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 690.00 45.00KOSHIOL MARNI SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 1,116.00KROOG, RACHAEL ADULT PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUE 760.00ADULT PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,876.00 175.00LAHM GRIFFIN LIFEGUARDING REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 175.00 121.39LAING MARILYN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 121.39 1,000.00LALONDE PROPERTIES, LLC.ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 192.33LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 192.33 42.87LARSEN CHRISTINE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 22 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 42.87 182.56LAUMANN, JOHN WATER UTILITY G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 182.56 20.00LAURA K WILLIAMS TUGANA TRUST AGREEMENT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 20.00 315.30LAWSON PRODUCTS INC GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 315.30 61,012.50LDV, INC.POLICE MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 61,012.50 32,042.00LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 32,042.00 4,886.96LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS 4,886.96 28.28LEGACY COMPANIES, INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 28.28 1,410.00LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,410.00 5.34LEONHARDT TOM SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41.19PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18.31WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3.81SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7.63STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76.28 2,043.25LHB INC SUSTAINABILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,043.25 294.40LIBERTY TIRE SERVICES LLC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 294.40 52.19LIED ROBERT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 52.19 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 23 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 45.00LIETZAU CAITLIN SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 128.70LIGHTING PLASTICS OF MN INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.70 110.00LOCKGUARD LOCKSMITHS REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 110.00 258.24LOFFLERIT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 258.24 1,497.03LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,497.03 41,195.00LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 750.00CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,146.96TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 77,091.96 1,170.00LOTUS PRINT GROUP FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,170.00 13,212.00LSV METALS INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 13,212.00 4,630.01LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 50.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4,680.01 108.33LYNCH KEVIN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.33 577.67MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,346.16SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 205,704.00CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY 208,627.83 31,771.98MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY OF GAINSVILLE, INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 31,771.98 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 24 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 26.24MARCY CONSTRUCTION WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 26.24 950.00MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 950.00 93.75MARTIN CHARLYN INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 93.75 1,133.12MARTINEZ THOMAS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 1,133.12 1,159.00MASIMO AMERICAS INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,159.00 1.75MASTER CRAFT MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 126.25BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 128.00 2,099.18MASTER MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 2,099.18 138.13MELROSE ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 138.13 145.96MENARDSFACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 53.58FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 54.27ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.46ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 71.44WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 72.94WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 59.88PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 81.71WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 4.96HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.95VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 573.15 255.23MERRILL BRIDGET WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 255.23 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 25 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 90.41MESA ISABELLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 90.41 11,665.00METRO BLOOMS DESIGN + BUILD LLC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,665.00 61,503.75METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 388,094.20OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 449,597.95 3,752.14METROPOLITAN MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 3,752.14 110.50MIDLAND HVAC LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 110.50 1,192.50MIDWEST GROUNDCOVER PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,192.50 74.75MILL CITY HEATING AND COOLING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 74.75 101.85MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 101.85SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 203.70 303.50MINNESOTA AMBULANCE ASSOCIATION GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 303.50 424.08MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS 424.08 23.00MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 23.00 1,429.25MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 1,429.25 125.00MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 125.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 26 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,000.00MINTZ MAX & AVIGAIL ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,000.00 680.16MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 680.16 71.41MINVALCO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 166.00WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 237.41 200.00MN DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY FACILITIES MCTE G & A LICENSES 200.00 1,097.57MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,280.51STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 952.65CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5.52PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 90.15WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 111.29SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 145.18STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,682.87 3,116.14MODERN HEATING AND AIR BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 3,116.14 60.13MODERN PIPING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 60.13 50.00MONDRAGON JORGE ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 300.00VARIANCESZONING/SUBDIVISION 350.00 42.45MONTANTE SHANNON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 42.45 55.00MR CUTTING EDGE REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 55.00 32.10MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 426.91GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 459.01 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 27 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 467.97MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 467.97 1,064.47NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 18.99VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.38VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 9.90GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.69GENERAL REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 1,120.43 4,002.00NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 4,002.00 59.35N-E-P CORPORATION WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 59.35 48.19NIEHAUS MCKINSEY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 48.19 30.88NORDIC MECHANICAL SERVICES BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 739.53REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 770.41 518.40NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 295.14PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 813.54 1,222.02NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,222.02 5,452.58NYSTROM PUBLISHING COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 5,452.58 532.41OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 532.41 92.23OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 51.24ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 91.56HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES 90.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 28 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 310.18COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 345.83COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 70.60ASSESSING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 119.05FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 100.71COMM DEV PLANNING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 7.44POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 44.38POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 113.64BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 125.71PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 9.63PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 36.12CABLE TV G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 80.93ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,689.25 202.72OKEY MIKE PUBLIC WORKS G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 202.72 462.00OLMSTEAD MEDICAL CENTER SPORTS MEDICINEFIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 462.00 434.88OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 434.88 8.82O'MORCHOE PATRICE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 8.82 1,312.00ON SITE SANITATION FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 228.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 57.00SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,923.40FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110.00OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,630.40 192.00ONE WAY WIRELESS BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 192.00 22.60O'REILLY FIRST CALL GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 106.19GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 128.79 439.04OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 29 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 439.04 234.00PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 234.00 115.68PANDAY RAJNISH REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 115.68 109.40PEILEN, BRUCE & LISA REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 109.40 1,014.02PER MAR SECURITY SERVICES WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,014.02 350.00PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 350.00 30.00PETTY CASH POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 7.99PUBLIC WORKS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 39.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 13.15PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A EQUIPMENT PARTS 19.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 15.02WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 31.35WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 95.00WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 22.99SOLID WASTE G&A EXTRA REFUSE STICKER REVENUE 51.99PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 22.48NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.90VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SMALL TOOLS 35.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LICENSES 399.87 3,198.67PHILLIPS TREE CARE LLC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,198.67 73.22PLEGGENKUHLE NANCY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 73.22 225.00POMMREHN LELAND GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 30 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,555.00POVOLNY SPECIALTIES INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,555.00 375.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 375.00 329.77PRECISE MRM, LLC.SNOW PLOWING EQUIPMENT PARTS 329.77 45.50PREVENTIVE MECHANICAL SERVICES BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 45.50 43.34PRG NATCHEZ TWO LLC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 43.34 57.60PRIDE ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 57.60 424.70PWF SOLUTIONS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 424.70 821.53R & R SPECIALTIES OF WISCONSIN, INC. REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,179.25RECREATION OUTDOOR CENTER OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,000.78 30,070.76RAINBOW TREECARE NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30,070.76 387.43RANDY'S ENVIORMENTAL SERVICES GRANTS GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 387.43 19.31RASMUSSEN, SUE FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 19.31 2,716.66REACH MEDIA NETWORK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 543.34TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 3,260.00 584.96RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 114.74BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 699.70 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 31 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 34,621.28-REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION, LLC.STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 631,591.19STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,712.00PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,600.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 36,522.40STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 657,804.31 210.00REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A TRAINING 75.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 178.50WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 463.50 41,253.00REHRIG PACIFIC CO SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER 41,253.00 81.67REITAN GREGORY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 81.67 32,436.39REPUBLIC SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 32,436.39 175.82RIGID HITCH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 175.82 1,033.71RIVARD ABBY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 1,033.71 1,031.94ROBERT B HILL CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,031.94 8,015.45ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,204.23FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 10,219.68 138.32RODRIGUEZ ANTONIO FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 138.32 260.00ROTARY CLUB OF SLP POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 260.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 32 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1.00ROTO-ROOTER BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 100.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 101.00 750.00RYAN JOHANNA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 750.00 60.13S R MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 60.13 65.00SALA, GRANT BLDG & ENERGY G & A LICENSES 65.00 97.60Salt Salon Spa GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT 97.60 4,145.76SAMBATEK, INC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,145.76 100.00SAM'S CLUB SUPPORT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT 100.00 2,448.00SAVATREETREE DISEASE PRIVATE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,448.00 45.00SCHAETZ JENNA SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 75.00SCHLEPPENBACH JAKE TENNIS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 75.00 1,025.79SCHOEBEN'S WINDOW CLEANING SERVICE FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,025.79 1.00SEDGWICK HEATING AND AIR BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 66.00 72.50SETS DESIGN INC.POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 72.50 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 33 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,970.00SEVER CONSTRUCTION BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 4,970.00 530.00SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 530.00 560.00SHAMBLOTT RACHEL LIFEGUARDING REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 560.00 1,117.00SHAPCO PRINTING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 1,117.00 259.28SHINGLES KORI ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 259.28 32,276.65SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 2,914.45SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 35,191.10 238.10SHUBEEBLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 238.10 89.38SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 12,240.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 178.00AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE 12,507.38 96.53SINKULA, STEVEN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 96.53 39,496.19SIR LINES-A-LOT PAINTING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 39,496.19 118.61SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 80.68PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 199.29 260.82SKELLY GABE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 260.82 95.63SKOGEN JEFFREY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 34 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 95.63 1.00SLEDGE, SHARAE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT 135.18FINANCE G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 136.18 758.95SMART CARE EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS CONCESSIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 758.95 58.56SMITH KEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 58.56 692.25SOLID REFRIGERATION BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 692.25 210.00SORENSON JAMES LIFEGUARDING REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 210.00 7,321.02SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECH INC SOLID WASTE G&A YARD WASTE SERVICE 7,321.02 45.50SPRIGGS PLUMBING AND HEATING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 45.50 10.31SPS COMPANIES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 78.12WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 9.87WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 98.30 5,736.00SQUARERIGGER SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 5,736.00 42,160.21SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 10,789.07CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 483.03WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,260.42SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,109.47STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 55,802.20 1,970.00ST PAUL CITY OF POLICE G & A TRAINING 1,970.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 35 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 35Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 10,980.00ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY KIDS IN THE PARK RENT ASSIST OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,980.00 1.48STAFFORD HOME SERVICE BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 181.63BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 183.11 1,209.60STAR TRIBUNE ESCROWS KNOLLWOOD - INDIRECT SOURCE PR 560.98ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,770.58 93.94STEINKRAUS PLUMBING INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 93.94 5,533.28STREICHER'S POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 5,533.28 5.28STREUFERT ERIK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 5.28 1.00SUBURBAN ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 66.00 3,711.94SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 3,711.94 5,504.40SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC REILLY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,504.40 235.00SUNBELT RENTALS INC REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 235.00 29.58SUSTAINABLE HEATING AND COOLING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 29.58 225.00SYSKO KENNETH POLICE G & A TRAINING 225.00 2,400.00SYSTEMS INTEGRATORS TRAINING TRAINING City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 36 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 36Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,400.00 2,699.06TARGETSOLUTIONS LEARNING FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,699.06 400.00TASCEMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 400.00 333.46TEAM VAIL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 333.46 45.00TEICHNER, CAROLYN SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 67.08TELELANGUAGE INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 67.08 152.01TERMINAL SUPPLY CO GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 152.01 373.09THE MITOGRAPHERS INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 373.09 245.00THE RETROFIT COMPANIES INC REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 245.00 447.01THE SHERWIN WILLIAMS PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 447.01 14.03THE SHERWINN WILLIAMS CO WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 216.24PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 230.27 335.98THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 335.98 45.00THORNE LAURA SOCCER REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 514.40THRIVEPASSEMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 514.40 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 37 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 37Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 972.90THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 972.90 1,131.88TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 302.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 446.00SUSTAINABILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,879.88 66.57TITLESMART, INC.SUNSET RIDGE COLLECTED BY CITY 66.57 11.64TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.64 15,248.97TOOLE DESIGN GROUP, LLC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 15,248.97 222.72TOWMASTERGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 222.72 2,574.58TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONTROL CO., INC. INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS 2,574.58 1,298.00TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP RELAMPING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,298.00 603.50TRANSPORT GRAPHICS FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 603.50 27,396.23TREE TRUST PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,396.23 36.92TRIPP SHARON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 36.92 10,000.00TULLY, CHRISTOPHER GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 10,000.00 1.00TWIN CITIES ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 38 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 38Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 66.00 1,000.00TWIN CITIES FILM FEST RACE EQUITY & INCLUSION G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,000.00SUSTAINABILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 2,000.00 1,755.00TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,755.00 84.50TWIN CITY MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 84.50 245.00UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 3,316.35PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 246.97PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,808.32 275.00UNITED STATES ICE RINK ASSOCIATION REC CENTER BUILDING SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 275.00 294.46UNITED STATES MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 294.46 1,190.72US AUTOFORCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,190.72 740.16USA BLUE BOOK WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 740.16 16,271.25VALLEY-RICH CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 16,271.25 100.00VERIFIED CREDENTIALS HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 100.00 50.04VERIZONSEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE 20,963.92CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 21,013.96 443.25VETERAN ELECTRIC REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 1,347.00REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 39 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 39Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,790.25 14,090.00-VIKING PAINTING LLC WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 281,800.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 267,710.00 1,620.00VOLGISTICS INC.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES 324.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,944.00 3,066.20WARNING LITES OF MN INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 440.00SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,506.20 987.52WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,786.65-SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 113,039.46SOLID WASTE G&A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 39,958.92SOLID WASTE G&A RECYCLING SERVICE 22,088.43SOLID WASTE G&A YARD WASTE SERVICE 38,284.32SOLID WASTE G&A ORGANICS 188,572.00 415.68WENCL SERVICES BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 415.68 79.63WENZEL HEATING AND AIR CONDITIONING BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 79.63 159.25WENZEL PLYMOUTH PLUMBING BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 159.25 214,800.00WEST HENNEPIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING LAND TRHOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET LOANS RECEIVABLE - CURRENT 214,800.00 67.40WESTERN ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 67.40 149.85WHIPPER SNAPPER LAWN SERVICE PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 255.00WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 404.85 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 40 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 40Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,500.00WHITE CRANE CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL 1,500.00 257.88WILLIAMS HENRY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 257.88 552.00WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE RELAMPING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 81.09WIRING REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 106.42SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 739.51 185.00WS & D PERMIT SERVICE BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 185.00 210.88WSB ASSOC INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,355.62PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,084.50WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 120.50SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 241.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,012.50 22,638.20XCEL ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 12,524.81PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 36.25SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 755.16STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 4,570.83PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 110.29BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 40,635.54 1,076.42YALE MECHANICAL BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 1,076.42 2,562.00YOUNG ENV. CONSULTING GROUP, LLC. STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,562.00 19.00YOUNG PAIGE PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 19.00 45.00ZIAVRA PINELOPI TENNIS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 45.00 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 41 10/26/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 7:26:37R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 41Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 10/22/20219/25/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description Report Totals 3,971,726.18 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 42 Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4b Executive summary Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code related to the setting of fees. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to align with recommendations from the League of Minnesota Cities and adopt utility rates and liquor license fees by ordinance? Summary: Based on various Minnesota state statutes, the League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) advises setting most fees by ordinance. To comply with this guidance, staff recommends city council adopt utility rates and liquor license fees by ordinance, rather than by resolution. City codes to be modified include 3-59 Retail license fees, 32-31 Water rates, 32-32 Service connection fee, 32-98 Sewer rental rates, and 32-203 Water meters. This ordinance also corrects language in city code 32-142 Rates and charges. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Proposed ordinance LMC fee schedule guidance 2021 Appendix A Prepared by: Sharae Sledge, finance manager Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Discussion Background: The City of St. Louis Park fee schedule includes major items such as permits, license fees, and inspections. The current process to modify our fee schedule is to review all fees annually, by department, and staff determines where changes are needed. We then present these changes to council in the ordinance to be adopted for the following year. In prior years, we have set our utility and liquor license fees by resolution. Fees approved by resolution were not included on the schedule or fees being approved by ordinance. After reviewing guidance provided by the League of Minnesota Cities and seeking legal counsel, it has been decided that utility and liquor license fees should be adopted by ordinance. Present considerations: We propose changing our ordinance to comply with best practices and include the following fees in appendix A (see below). By moving from passage by resolution to passage by ordinance, the process will change from not including liquor license fees and utility fees in the fee ordinance, to now including them so they are published on the city’s website. This change will add convenience and increase visibility for users when looking for fees charged by the city. We will continue to list utility rates separately on the utility billing web page, but they will now also be included on the fee schedule. Fees to be added to the Appendix A fee schedule: Bassett Creek Watershed Management District (property pass-through charge) Residential monthly $0.77 per residential equivalent unit Residential quarterly $2.31 per residential equivalent unit Land uses other than residential (Acreage * REF * 2.31 * 5) = quarterly rate Sanitary Sewer Base Charge Residential and multi-family $20.79 per quarter Commercial $6.94 per month Sewer and Service Charges Sanitary Sewer Usage Rate $4.06 per unit Solid Waste Svc - Collection Cost per Quarter (Includes tax when applicable) 20 gallon EOW service (Every Other Week) $33.49 30 gallon EOW service (Every Other Week) $44.52 20 gallon service $46.48 30 gallon service $63.53 60 gallon service $90.43 90 gallon service $138.60 120 gallon service $220.19 150 gallon service $275.22 180 gallon service $330.26 270 gallon service $495.39 360 gallon service $660.55 Solid Waste Service (Residential) Additional 30 gallon cart $63 Additional 60 gallon cart $63 Additional 90 gallon cart $63 Cart Changes - over 1 per cart type per 12 month period $20 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Solid Waste Service (Commercial) - Collection Cost 30 gallon service Garbage (monthly) $16.58 Garbage (quarterly) $49.73 60 gallon service Garbage (monthly) $28.53 Garbage (quarterly) $85.60 Organics (monthly) $12.84 Organics (quarterly) $38.52 90 gallon service Garbage (monthly) $42.80 Garbage (quarterly) $128.41 Recycling (monthly) $14.95 Recycling (quarterly) $44.84 Organics (monthly) N/A Organics (quarterly) N/A 120 gallon service Organics (monthly) $24.65 Organics (quarterly) $73.95 180 gallon service Garbage (monthly) $88.37 Garbage (quarterly) $265.10 Recycling (monthly) $26.78 Recycling (quarterly) $80.33 Organics (monthly) $36.97 Organics (quarterly) $110.92 270 gallon service Recycling (monthly) $36.97 Recycling (quarterly) $110.92 Storm Water Rate Single family quarterly $27.85 per residential equivalent unit Basic system rate monthly $46.43 per residential equivalent unit Basic system rate quarterly $139.25 per residential equivalent unit Land uses other than residential (Acreage * REF * 27.85 * 5) = quarterly rate Water Meter Charges Commercial Monthly Fee 5/8" meter $13.26 3/4" $13.26 1" $18.55 1.5" $23.85 2" $38.41 3" $145.75 4" $185.50 6" $278.23 Residential/Multi-family Quarterly Fee 5/8" meter $39.78 3/4" $39.78 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees 1" $55.65 1.5" $71.54 2" $115.24 3" $437.24 4" $556.49 6" $834.69 2" compound $114.25 3" compound $433.47 Water Rates per unit (1 unit = 100 cu ft or 750 gallons) Residential Tier 1 0 - 13.333 units (0 - 10,000 gallons) $2.16 Tier 2 13.333 - 20 units (10,000 - 15,000 gallons) $2.62 Tier 3 > 20 units (>15,000 gallons) $3.15 Multi Family All units $2.62 Commercial Tier 1 0 - 100 units (0 - 75,000 galllons) $2.39 Tier 2 100 - 300 units (75,000 - 225,000 galllons) $2.63 Tier 3 > 300 units (>225,000 galllons) $2.92 Industrial Tier 1 0 - 1,000 units (0 - 750,000 galllons) $2.39 Tier 2 1,000 - 3,000 units (750,000 - 2,225,000 galllons) $2.63 Tier 3 > 3,000 units (>2,225,000 galllons) $2.92 Irrigation All units $4.29 Water Shut Off/Turn On Normal business hours (6 a.m. - 3 p.m.) $55.00 After hours (After 3:00 p.m., Weekends) $165.00 Liquor Licenses Club (per # members) 1 - 200 $300 201 - 500 $500 501 - 1000 $650 1001 - 2000 $800 2001 - 4000 $1,000 4001 - 6000 $2,000 6000+ $3,000 Off-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor $200 Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor $380 Off-sale Intoxicating Liquor fee, per M.S. 340A.480-3(c ) $280 On-sale 3.2 Malt Liquor $750 On-sale Culinary Class Limited $100 On-sale Intoxicating Liquor $8,750 On-sale Sunday Liquor $200 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Next steps: Modify city code to adopt utility and liquor license fees by ordinance rather than set by resolution. Add liquor license fees and utility rates to appendix A items of fee schedule. Staff will continue to evaluate all fees annually as part of the budget process. Fees will be updated to remain comparable with other cities and to ensure that amounts charged adequately cover costs associated with providing city services. A public hearing with first reading of the full Appendix A fee schedule will be held on Nov. 15, 2021. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Ordinance No. ___-21 City of St. Louis Park Hennepin County, Minnesota An Ordinance Amending St. Louis Park City Code Sections relating to the setting of fees The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. St. Louis Park City Code Section 3-59(a) is hereby amended by adding the underlined language and deleting the strikethrough language as follows: Sec. 3-59. Retail license fees. (a)Annual fees. The annual fee for all licenses shall be set by the city council, by resolution ordinance, in amounts no greater than those set forth in M.S.A. Ch. 340A. Section 2. St. Louis Park City Code Section 32-31(a) is hereby amended by adding the underlined language and deleting the strikethrough language as follows: Sec. 32-31. Water rates. (a)Rates. The rate due and payable to the city by each water user with the city for billings on or after February 26, 2001, for water taken from the city water supply system shall be set by city council resolution ordinance. All charges for single-family and multiple-family dwelling users shall be determined and payable on a quarterly basis, and all charges for commercial, industrial and institutional users shall be determined and payable on a monthly or quarterly basis; provided, however, that there shall be a service charge to each water user for each quarter year period during which water service is furnished as set by city council resolution. In case the meter is found to have stopped or to be operating in a faulty manner, the amount of water used will be estimated in accordance with the amount previously used for the comparable period of the last previous year. Section 3. St. Louis Park City Code Section 32-31(c) is hereby amended by adding the underlined language and deleting the strikethrough language as follows: Sec. 32-31. Water rates. (c)Water bills. Water bills shall be mailed to customers for the service periods set forth in subsection (a) of this section, and shall specify the water consumed and the charges in accordance with rates set forth by city council resolution ordinance. Section 4. St. Louis Park City Code Section 32-32 is hereby amended by adding the underlined language and deleting the strikethrough language as follows: City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Sec. 32-32. Service connection fee. The state-mandated service connection fee listed in this section for testing water supplies will be collected by the city and remitted to the state department of revenue. The service connection fee due and payable to the city by each water user within the city for water taken from the city water supply system shall be an amount set by city council resolution ordinance. Section 5. St. Louis Park City Code Section 32-98 is hereby amended by adding the underlined language and deleting the strikethrough language as follows: Sec. 32-98. Sewer rental rates. Charges for sewer service to residential and nonresidential users within the city provided in section 32-97 for billings on or after February 26, 2001, shall be: an amount per 100 cubic feet of water consumption set by city council resolution, as measured during the winter consumption (or otherwise determined in subsection (1) of this section), and a monthly service charge of an amount set by city council resolution ordinance, or an amount quarterly per dwelling or account set by city council resolution ordinance. (1) All residential sewer customer charges shall be determined by computing the winter water consumption as determined by the city billing cycle for each district. Commercial sewer charges shall be determined by computing the water consumption each month throughout the year. In any case where winter meter readings are not available or appropriate, charges shall be made on the basis of current water consumption. (2) A penalty of ten percent shall be added to the amount due on any sewer bill if not paid within three weeks after the billing date. Payments received within three working days following the due date shall be deemed as paid within such period. (3) All owners, lessees and occupants of buildings discharging sewerage into the city sewer while using water from any source other than the city municipal water system shall install meters or other measuring devices meeting with the city water meter specifications to measure either the water used or the discharge into the sewer. Section 6. St. Louis Park City Code Section 32-142 is hereby amended by adding the underlined language and deleting the strikethrough language as follows: Sec. 32-142. Rates and charges. Fees for the use and availability of the storm sewer system shall be determined through the use of a residential equivalent factory (REF). A residential equivalent factory is the ratio of the volume of runoff generated by one acre of a particular land use to the volume of runoff generated by one acre of single-family and two-family residential land use based upon average annual rainfall. Section 7. St. Louis Park City Code Section 32-203(e) is hereby amended by adding the underlined language and deleting the strikethrough language as follows: City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 8 Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Sec. 32-203. Water meters. (e) Whenever any meter shall become obstructed or out of order, the director of public works shall cause it to be repaired. The director of public works shall direct the cost of such repairs to be paid out of the funds of the water department unless the meter has been damaged by freezing or willful neglect by someone outside of the city employ. On request of any customer and payment to the city clerk of a fee set by city council resolution ordinance, the director of public works will test such water meter. All water meters obtained from the city shall remain the property of the city and may be replaced at any time by the director of public works if found to be worn or defective beyond repair. Such replacement shall be paid for from water department funds. Section 8. This ordinance shall take effect November 26, 2021. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading 10/18/2021 Second reading 11/1/2021 Date of publication 11/11/2021 Date ordinance takes effect 11/26/2021 League of Minnesota Cities Model Form 11/18/2020 Fees Set by Ordinance or Resolution Chart Page 1 Fees Set by Ordinance or Resolution Chart, LMC Model Form Helpful background information on this model may be found in the Licensing Chapter of the Handbook for Minnesota Cities. FEE SCHEDULES: FIXING FEES VIA ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION It is becoming increasingly popular for cities to make use of a fee schedule in setting and/or changing licensing and other regulatory fees. The fee schedule is a list of each fee charged by the city that is usually found in an appendix of the city’s ordinance book. Fee schedules are developed in lieu of listing individual dollar amounts in each separate licensing or regulatory section of the ordinance book. By using a fee schedule, a city can revise all its fees at once in a single ordinance revision, rather than revising many separate ordinance provisions. The schedule also generally makes it easier to handle publishing concerns. While fee schedules can be convenient, they have the tendency to blur the distinctions between different types of licensing fees. Often State statutes impose unique notice or hearing provisions regarding a change in licensing fees. In other instances, State statutes may prescribe dollar limitations on certain fees. Cities must heed these requirements in changing their fees even when using a blanket fee schedule. Finally, most fees should be set via ordinance and changed via an ordinance amendment. Although fixing license fees by resolution is more convenient and eliminates the necessity of publishing, fixing fees in such a manner is probably invalid. A rare exception to this occurs only where the enabling State statute allows for the fee to be sent via resolution. Where State statute does not permit cities to set the fee via resolution, such fees are probably void and likely unenforceable in a court of law. The attached chart has been developed by the League Research Department to provide cities with a convenient method for determining whether a fee should be set via ordinance or resolution, when a public hearing or individual notice is required and whether the State imposes limits on the fee amount. Type of Fee Establish by ordinance? Establish by resolution? Fee set or limited by state law? Hearing required? Notice required? Statute or rule reference Liquor Licensing On-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License Yes No No Yes Yes 340A.408 Subd. 1. Page 9 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees League of Minnesota Cities Model Form 11/18/2020 Fees Set by Ordinance or Resolution Chart Page 2 Type of Fee Establish by ordinance? Establish by resolution? Fee set or limited by state law? Hearing required? Notice required? Statute or rule reference Off-Sale 3.2 Malt Liquor License Yes No No Yes Yes 340A.408 Subd. 1 Club On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Yes No Yes Yes Yes 340A.408 Subd. 2(b). On-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Yes No Yes, may only be set to cover costs and enforcement. Yes Yes 340A.408 Subd. 2. Intoxicating Liquor Wine License Yes No Yes Yes Yes 340A.408 Subd. 2(c). Off-Sale Intoxicating Liquor Yes No Yes Yes Yes 340A.408 Subd. 3. Transient Commerce Peddlers & Solicitors License Yes No No No No 412.221 Subd. 19. Animals Pet/Dog License Yes No No No No 412.221 Subd. 21. Amusements & Entertainments Public Dance License Yes No No No No 412.221 Subd. 27. Special Event or Entertainment Permit Yes No No No No 412.221 Subd. 25. Bowling Alley License Yes No No No No 412.221 Subd. 25. Billiard & Pool Hall License Yes No No No No 412.221 Subd. 25. Page 10 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees League of Minnesota Cities Model Form 11/18/2020 Fees Set by Ordinance or Resolution Chart Page 3 Type of Fee Establish by ordinance? Establish by resolution? Fee set or limited by state law? Hearing required? Notice required? Statute or rule reference Game Room & Arcade License Yes No Yes, amusement machines limited to actual cost or $15. No No 412.221. Subd. 25 & 449.15. Tobacco Cigarette & Tobacco Sales License Yes No Yes. May only be set to cover costs & enforcement. No fee for a person who is blind. No Yes 461.12. 461.15. Gambling Gambling Permit for exempt gambling (bingo, pull-tab, paddlewheel, etc.) Yes No Yes No No 349.213 Subd. 1. Annual or initial gambling Investigation Fees Yes No Yes No No 349.16 Subd. 8. Businesses Tear Gas & Stun Gun Sales Yes No No No No 624.731. Pawn Brokers License Yes No No No No 325J.02. Small Vehicle Passenger Service including vehicles used for nonemergency medical care, pedicabs, rickshaws, or other similar vehicles Yes No No No No 221.091. 412.221, subd. 20. Massage Parlor license Yes No No No No 412.221 Subd. 23. Page 11 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees League of Minnesota Cities Model Form 11/18/2020 Fees Set by Ordinance or Resolution Chart Page 4 Type of Fee Establish by ordinance? Establish by resolution? Fee set or limited by state law? Hearing required? Notice required? Statute or rule reference Solid waste collection license Yes No No No No . 115A.93, subd. 1; 412.221, subd. 22. Utilities Gas/Electricity User Rates Yes No Yes No No 453.57. Water User Rates, Connection and Availability Charges Yes No Yes No No 444.075 Subd. 3a. Sanitary Sewer Rates Yes No Yes No No 444.075 Subd. 3a. Storm Sewer Rates Yes No Yes No No 444.075 Subd. 3b. Zoning & Building Zoning Fees Yes Yes, if revenues less than $5,000.00 per year & ordinance sets a fee schedule. Yes, must be reasonable & proportionate to services rendered. Yes Yes 462.353. Building Permits & Inspections Yes No Yes, must be reasonable & proportionate. No No Minn. Building Code 1300.0160 subp. 2 – 6. Park Dedication Fees Yes No Yes No No 462.358. Page 12 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Administrative Penalties Chapter 4 – Animal Regulations $50 Chapter 6 – Buildings & Building Regulations Chapter 6, Article V – Property Maintenance Code $100 Chapter 8 – Business and Business Licenses $100 Chapter 12 – Environment $50 Chapter 12, Section 1 – Environment & Public Health Regulations Adopted by Reference $100 Chapter 12, Section 157 – Illicit Discharge and Connection $100 Chapter 12, Section 159 – Wetland Protection $100 Chapter 14 – Fire and Fire Prevention $100 Chapter 14, Section 75 – Open burning without permit $100 Chapter 20 – Parks and Recreation $50 Chapter 22 – Solid Waste Management Chapter 22, Multifamily & Commercial $50 $100 Chapter 22, Section 35b – Contagious Disease Refuse $200 Chapter 24 – Streets, Sidewalks & Public Places $50 Chapter 24, Section 24-43 – Household Trash & Recycling Containers blocking public way Chapter 24, Section 47 - Visual obstructions at intersections $50 $100 Chapter 24, Section 50 – Public Property: Defacing or injuring $150 Chapter 24, Section 51 – Sweeping leaves or snow into street prohibited $100 Chapter 24, Section 151 – Work in public right-of-way without a permit $100 Chapter 24, Section 342 – Snow, ice and rubbish a public nuisance on sidewalks; removal by owner $25 first time; fee shall double for each subsequent violation, with a maximum fee of $200 for SFR and $400 for all others. Does not reset annually. Does reset for new owners. Chapter 26 – Subdivision $100 Violation of a condition associated with a Subdivision approval. $750 Chapter 32 – Utilities $50 Violation of sprinkling ban $50 first time; fee shall double for each subsequent violation, with a maximum fee of $200 for SFR and $400 for all others. Does not reset reset annually. Does reset for new owners. Chapter 36 – Zoning $50 Chapter 36, Section 37 – Conducting a Land Use not permitted in the zoning district $100 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 13 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Violation of a condition associated with a Conditional Use Permit, Planned Unit Development, or Special Permit approval $750 Repeat Violations within 24 Months Previous fine doubled up to a maximum of $2,000 Double the amount of the fine imposed for the previous violation, up to a maximum of $2,000. For example, if there were four occurrences of a violation that carried a $50 fine, the fine for the fourth occurrence would be $400 (first: $50; second: $100; third: $200; fourth: $400). Fines in addition to abatement and licensing inspections Fines listed above may be in addition to fees associated with abatement and licensing inspections. City Clerk’s Office Domestic Partnership Registration Application Fee $50 Amendment to Application Fee $25 Termination of Registration Fee $25 Community Development Department Comprehensive Plan Amendments $2,150 Conditional Use Permit $2,150 Major Amendment $2,120 Minor Amendment Fill or Excavation only $1,150 $570 Fence Permit Installation $20 Grant Technical Assistance (DEED, Met Council, Hennepin County, etc.) $3,000 ($2,000 non-refundable) Numbering of Buildings (New Addresses) $50 Official Map Amendment $600 Parking Lot Permit Installation/Reconstruction $75 Driveway Permit $25 Planned Unit Development Preliminary PUD $3,000 Final PUD $3,000 Prelim/Final PUD Combined $5,000 PUD - Major Amendment $2,150 PUD – Minor Amendment $1,150 Recording Filing Fee Single Family $50 Other Uses $120 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 14 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Registration of Land Use $50 Sign Permit Erection of Temporary Sign $30 Erection of Real Estate, Construction Sign 40+ ft $100 Installation of Permanent Sign without footings $100 Installation of Permanent Sign with footings Super graphic (mural) $150 $30 Special Permits Major Amendment $2,150 Minor Amendment $1,150 Street, Alley, Utility Vacations $900 Subdivision Dedication Park Dedication (in lieu of land) Commercial/Industrial Properties 5% of current market value of the unimproved land as determined by city assessor Multi-family Dwelling Units $1,500 per dwelling unit Single-family Dwelling Units $1,500 per dwelling unit Trails $225 per residential dwelling unit Subdivisions/Replats Preliminary Plat $1,000 plus $150 per lot Final Plat $600 Combined Process and Replats $1,200 plus $150 per lot Exempt and Administrative Subdivisions $375 Temporary Use Carnival & Festival over 14 days $1,500 Mobile Use Vehicle Zoning Permit (Food or Medical) $50 Time Extension $200 Traffic Management Plan Administrative Fee $0.10 per sq. ft. of gross floor Tree Replacement Cash in lieu of replacement trees $140 per caliper inch Variances Commercial $550 Residential $300 Zoning Appeal $300 Zoning Letter $50 Zoning Map Amendments $2,150 Zoning Permit Accessory Structures, 200 sq. ft. or less $25 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 15 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Zoning Text Amendments $3,000 Engineering Department Permit Parking – High School and Medical Need Right of Way Permits No charge Base Fee Installation/repair of sidewalk, curb cut or curb and gutter permit Excavation $65 $130 Hole in Boulevard (larger than 10” diameter) $65 per hole Hole in Road (larger than 10” diameter) $130 per hole Trenching in Boulevard 0-100 ft = $200, over 100 ft = $200 + $1 per sq. ft. over 100 ft Trenching in Roadway 0-100 ft = $400, over 100 ft = $400 + $1 per sq. ft. over 100 ft Delay Penalty 2 times total permit fee Obstruction (road, lane, sidewalk, or bikeway closure) $100 per week Small Cell Wireless Facility Permit Permit Fee $1,500 per antenna Rent to occupy space on a city-owned wireless support structure $150 per year, per antenna Maintenance associated with space on a city-owned wireless support structure $25 per year, per antenna Electricity to operate small wireless facility, if not purchased directly from a utility (i)$73 per radio node less than or equal to 100 max watts; (ii) $182 per radio node over 100 max watts Actual costs of electricity if the actual costs exceed the amount in item (i) or (ii). Delay Penalty 2 times total permit fee Temporary No Parking Signs (for ROW permit work) Temporary Private Use of Public Property Deposit of $25/sign (minimum $100 per permit) $750 Dewatering Permit Administrative Fee (all permits) Discharge to Sanitary Sewer $250 Charge based on duration/volume of discharge Erosion Control Permit Application and Review – single family Application and Review – all other applicants $350 $750 Deposit – single family Deposit – other applicants $1,500 $3,000 per acre (min. $1,500) Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 16 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Mobility Sharing Device Impoundment Impoundment fee $56 per mobility sharing device Storage fee $18 per day if not retrieved on the same day of impoundment. License fee $100 per mobility sharing device Fire Department False Alarm Residential Commercial 1st Offense $0 $0 2nd Offense in same year $100 $100 3rd Offense in same year $150 $200 4th Offense in same year $200 $300 5th Offense in same year $200 $400 Fireworks Display Permit Actual costs incurred Service Fees Service Fee for fully-equipped & staffed vehicles $500 per hour for a ladder truck $325 per hour for a full-size fire truck $255 per hour for a rescue unit Service Fee of a Chief Officer $100 per hour After Hours Inspections $65 per hour (minimum 2 hrs.) Tents and Membrane Permit Tents/membrane structures over 400 sq. ft. $100 Building & Energy Department Building Demolition Deposit 1 & 2 Family Residential & Accessory Structures $2,500 All Other Buildings $5,000 Building Demolition Permit 1 & 2 Family Residential & Accessory Structures $180 All Other Buildings $300 Building Moving Permit $500 Business Licenses Billboards $170 per billboard Commercial Entertainment $290 Courtesy Bench $70 Dog Kennel $165 Environmental Emissions Designated outdoor dog area $340 $50 Massage Therapy Massage Therapy Establishment $385 Massage Therapy License $125 Therapists holding a Massage Therapy Establishment Lic. $35 Pawnbroker License Fee $2,000 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 17 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Per Transaction Fee $2 Investigation Fee $1,000 Penalty $50 per day Sexually Oriented Business Investigation Fee (High Impact) $500 High Impact $4,500 Limited Impact $125 Tobacco Products & Related Device Sales $610 Vehicle Parking Facilities Enclosed Parking $245 Parking Ramp $195 Tanning Bed Facility $300 Certificate of Occupancy For each condominium unit completed after building occupancy $100 Change of Use (does not apply to 1 & 2 family dwellings) up to 5,000 sq ft $500 5,001 to 25,000 sq ft $800 25,001 to 75,000 sq ft $1,200 75,001 to 100,000 sq ft $1,600 100,000 to 200,000 sq ft $2,000 above 200,000 sq ft $2,500 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy – Single Family $90 Temporary Certificate of Occupancy – All other occupancies $150 Certificate of Property Maintenance Certificate of Property Maintenance Extension $65 Change in Ownership Condominium Unit $155 Duplex (2 Family dwellings) $335 Multi-Family (apartment) Buildings $300 per building +$17 per unit Single Family Dwellings $235 All Other Buildings: up to 5,000 sq ft $500 5,001 to 25,000 sq ft $800 25,001 to 75,000 sq ft $1,200 75,001 to 100,000 sq ft $1,600 100,000 to 200,000 sq ft $2,000 above 200,000 sq ft $2,500 Temporary Certificate of Property Maintenance SF Residential $95 All others $255 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 18 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Construction Permits (building, electrical, fire protection, mechanical, plumbing, pools, utilities) Building and Fire Protection Permits Valuation up to $500 Base Fee $65 $500.01 to $2,000.00 Base Fee $65 + $2 for each additional $100 over $500.01 (or fraction thereof) $2,000.01 to $25,000.00 Base Fee $95 + $15 for each additional $1,000 over $2,000.01 (or fraction thereof) $25,000.01 to $50,000.00 Base Fee $440 + $10 for each additional $1,000 over $25,000.01 (or fraction thereof) $50,000.01 to $100,000.00 Base Fee $690 + $7 for each additional $1,000 over $50,000.01 (or fraction thereof) $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 Base Fee $1,040 + $6 for each additional $1,000 over $100.000.01 (or fraction thereof) $500,000.00 to $1,000,000.00 Base Fee $3,440 + $5.50 for each additional $1,000 over $500,000.01 (or fraction thereof) $1,000,000.01 and up Base Fee $6,190 + 5.00 for each additional $1,000 over $1,000,000.01 (or fraction thereof) Single Family Residential Exceptions: Reroofing – asphalt shingled, sloped roofs only House or House and Garage $145 Garage Only $75 Residing House or House and Garage $145 Garage Only $75 Building Mounted Photovoltaic Panels $250 Electrical Permit Installation, Replacement, Repair $65 + 1.75% of job valuation Installation of traffic signals per location $150 Single family, one appliance $65 ISTS Permit Sewage treatment system install or repair $125 Mechanical Permit Installation, Replacement, Repair $65 + 1.75% of job valuation Single Family Exceptions: Replace furnace, boiler or furnace/AC $75 Install single fuel burning appliance with piping $75 Install, replace or repair single mechanical appliance $65 Plumbing Permit Installation, Replacement, Repair $65 + 1.75% of job valuation Single Family Exceptions: Repair/replace single plumbing fixture $65 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 19 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Private Swimming Pool Permit Building permit fees apply Public Swimming Pool Permit Building permit fees apply Sewer & Water Permit (all underground private utilities) Installation, Replacement, Repair $65 + 1.75% of job valuation Single Family Exceptions: Replace/repair sewer or water service $100 Water Access Charge $800 per SAC unit charged on new or enlarged water services Competency Exams Fees Mechanical per test $30 Renewal - 1 year Mechanical $15 Contractor Licenses Mechanical $110 Solid Waste $215 Tree Maintenance $105 Dog Licenses 1 year $25 2 year $40 3 year $50 Potentially Dangerous Dog License – 1 year $100 Dangerous Dog License – 1 year $250 Interim License $15 Off-Leash Dog Area Permit (non-resident) $55 Penalty for no license $40 Inspections After hours inspections $250 plus $90 per hour after first hour Installation of permanent sign w/footing inspection Based on valuation using building permit table Re-Inspection Fee (after correction notice issued and has not been corrected within 2 subsequent inspections) $130 Insurance Requirements A minimum of: Circus $1,000,000 General Liability Commercial Entertainment $1,000,000 General Liability Mechanical Contractors $1,000,000 General Liability Solid Waste $1,000,000 General Liability Tree Maintenance & Removal $1,000,000 General Liability Vehicle Parking Facility $1,000,000 General Liability ISTS Permit Sewage treatment system install or repair $125 License Fees – Other Investigation Fee $300 per establishment requiring a business license Late Fee 25% of license fee (minimum $50) License Reinstatement Fee $250 Transfer of License (new ownership) $75 Page 20 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Plan Review – 50% of amount due at time of application. Exception: Single Family Residential additions, accessory structures and remodels. Building Permits 65% of Permit Fee Repetitive Building 25% of Permit Fee for Duplicate Structure Electrical Permits 35% of Permit Fee Mechanical Permits 35% of Permit Fee Plumbing Permits 35% of Permit Fee Sewer & Water Permits 35% of Permit Fee Single Family Interior Remodel Permits 35% of Permit Fee Rental Housing License Condominium/Townhouse/Cooperative $100 per unit Duplex both sides non-owner occupied $185 per duplex Housing Authority owned single family dwelling units $15 per unit Multiple Family Per Building $250 Per Unit $18 Single Family Unit $135 per unit Temporary Noise Permit $70 Temporary Use Permits Amusement Rides, Carnivals & Circuses $260 Commercial Film Production Application $100 Petting Zoos $60 Temporary Outdoor Retail Sales $110 Vehicle Decals Solid Waste $26 Tree Maintenance & Removal $10 Operations & Recreation Department Permit to Exceed Vehicle Weight Limitations (MSC) $50 each Winter Parking Permit Caregiver parking $25 No off-street parking available No Charge Off-street parking available $125 Police Department Animals Animal Impound Initial impoundment $40 2nd offense w/in year $60 3rd offense w/in year $85 4th offense w/in year $110 Boarding Per Day $30 Dangerous Dog Annual Review Hearing $250 Potentially Dangerous Dog Annual Review Hearing $250 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 21 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Criminal Background Investigation Volunteers & Employees $5 False Alarm (Police) Residential Commercial 1st Offense $0 $0 2nd Offense in same year $100 $100 3rd Offense in same year $100 $125 4th Offense in same year $100 $150 5th Offense in same year $100 $175 Each subsequent in same year Late payment fee $100 10% $25 increase 10% Peddler Registration $150 Lost ID Replacement Fee $25 Solicitor Registration $0 Vehicle Forfeiture Administrative fee in certain vehicle forfeiture cases $250 Appendix A – 2021 Fee Schedule Page 22 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Title: Second reading to amend city code regarding setting of fees Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4c Executive summary Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Recommended actions: 1.Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-268-11 and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 2.Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance vacating drainage and utility easement and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 3.Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending right-of-way vacation ordinance and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Does the proposed redevelopment meet the city’s affordable housing and neighborhood development goals? Summary: ESG Architects, on behalf of Bigos Management, proposes a six-story, 233-unit apartment development on property located at 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard. Twenty percent (20%) of the units will be affordable at 50% area median income (AMI). The planning commission held a public hearing on Oct. 6, 2021 and recommended approval of a comprehensive plan amendment, preliminary and final pat, and PUD amendment. On Oct. 18, 2021, city council unanimously approved: a resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan 2040 Land Use Map for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard from office (OFC) and right-of-way (ROW) to high density residential (RH); a resolution for a preliminary and final plat; a first reading of the PUD amendment ordinance; a first reading of an easement vacation ordinance; and a first reading of a right-of-way vacation amendment ordinance. Financial or budget considerations: The development team has expressed that the proposed project’s financial pro forma exhibits a substantial gap which makes the mixed income development financially infeasible. To offset this gap, the development team has applied for tax increment financing (TIF) assistance to enable the project to proceed. Staff will submit a report outlining the TIF request to the EDA at a future meeting. Staff recommend collecting $349,500 in park dedication fees in-lieu of park land, and $52,425 in trail dedication fees. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: PUD amendment ordinance and summary for publication Easement vacation ordinance and summary for publication ROW vacation amendment ordinance and summary for publication Oct. 18 city council staff report Prepared by: Jacquelyn Kramer, associate planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning manager Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 11 The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (Case No. 21-35-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-268-PUD 11. Section 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 11 is hereby amended by deleting strikethrough text and adding underlined text. Section 36-268-PUD 11. (a) Development plan. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. Platia Place Sheet 1 2. Platia Place Sheet 2 3. Platia Place Sheet 3 4. CJ001 Civil Title Sheet 5. CD100 Existing Conditions, Tree Inventory & Demolition Plan 6. CS100 Overall Site Plan – DORA Exhibit 7. CS101 Site Plan – Lot 1 (Multi-Family) 8. CS102 Site Plan – Lot 2 (Hotel) 9. CS501 Site Details 10. CS502 Site Details 11. CS503 Site Details 12. CG101 Grading Plan – Lot 1 (Multi-Family) 13. CG102 Grading Plan – Lot 2 (Hotel) 14. CG110 Erosion Control Plan 15. CG111 SWPPP 16. CG501 Erosion Control Details 17. CU101 Utility Plan – Lot 1 (Multi-Family) 18. CU102 Utility Plan – Lot 2 (Hotel) 19. CU111 Storm Sewer Plan Lot 1 (Multi-Family) 20. CU100 Storm Sewer Plan Lot 2 (Hotel) 21. CU501 Utility Details 22. CU502 Utility Details 23. CU503 Utility Details (Stormtech) 24. CK101 Site Lighting Plan 25. A0.2 Reference Views 26. A0.3 Hotel Elevations 27. A0.4 Hotel Plans 28. A0.5 Multi-Family Housing - Elevations 29. A0.6 Multi-Family Housing - Plans 30. A0.7 Multi-Family Housing - Plans City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment 31. A6.0 Site Details 32. A6.7 Cement Plaster Details 33. Landscape Plan 1. A1-0 Parking Level – P1 2. A1-1 Levels 1-2 3. A1-2 Levels 3-6 4. A3-0 Elevations 5. AP1-1 Area Plan – P1 and Level 1 6. AP1-2 Area Plan – Levels 2 & 3-5 7. AP1-6 Area Plan – Level 6 8. AS0.00 Alta Survey 9. C0.00 Cover Sheet 10. C0.01 Removals Plan 11. C0.02 Fire Plan 12. C0.03 Site Plan 13. C0.04 Site Details 14. C0.05 Site Details 15. C0.06 Site Details 16. C0.07 Grading Plan 17. C0.08 Erosion Control Plan 18. C0.09 SWPPP 19. C0.10 Erosion Details 20. C0.11 Utility Plan 21. C0.12 Utility Service Profiles 22. C0.13 Utility Details 23. C0.14 Utility Details 24. C0.15 Utility Details 25. E0.2 Photometric Site Plan 26. E0.3 Photometric Plan Fixture Cut Sheet 27. E0.4 Photometric Plan Fixture Cut Sheet 28. L0.01 Landscape Notes and Schedules 29. L0.02 Landscape Plan 30. L0.02A Landscape Plan – Color 31. L0.03 Landscape Details 32. L0.04 DORA Plan 33. PL0.01 Preliminary Plat Sheet 1 34. PL0.02 Preliminary Plat Sheet 2 35. PL0.03 Final Plat Sheet 1 36. PL0.04 Final Plat Sheet 2 37. PL0.05 Final Plat Sheet 3 38. T1-0 Title Sheet 39. T2-1 Project Imagery 40. T2-2 Project Imagery 41. T2-3 Project Imagery 42. Shadow Studies The site shall also conform to the following requirements: City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 4 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment (1) The property shall be developed with 233 149 residential units and 63,740 square feet of hotel space. (2) At least 325 327 off-street parking spaces shall be provided. (3) The maximum building height shall not exceed 73 71 feet and six stories. (4) The development site shall include a minimum of 2025% designed outdoor recreation area based on private developable land area. (b) Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses on Lot 1: (1) Multiple-family dwellings, and uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings, including, but not limited to, the residential management office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly rooms and general amenity space. The following uses are permitted uses on Lot 2: (2) Commercial uses. Commercial uses are limited to the following: a. Hotel (c) Prohibited uses. (1) Extended-stay hotels. (2) Restaurants. (cd) Accessory uses. Accessory uses are as follows: (1) Home occupations as regulated by this chapter. (2) Gardens. (3) Parking lots. a. All parking requirements must be met for each use. b. A minimum of 20 parking spaces shall be designated and signed visitor parking on Lot 1. (4) Public transit stops/shelters. (5) Outdoor seating, excluding public address (PA) systems. (6) Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited. (de) Special performance standards. (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. Trash enclosures shall be constructed from the same materials as the principal building. (3) Signs shall be allowed in conformance with the following requirements found in the following districts: a. The apartment building signs shall be consistent with the sign regulations for the R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residential zoning district. b. The hotel building signage shall be consistent with the O - Office zoning district. c. Exemptions located in the zoning ordinance for wall signage shall not apply. cb. Pylon signs shall be prohibited. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 5 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment approved by City Council resolution _____ and not sooner than 15 days after publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Jake Spano, mayor Kim Keller, city manager Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading October 18, 2021 Second reading November 1, 2021 Date of publication November 11, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect Upon Metropolitan Council Authorization of associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than 15 days after publication. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 6 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Summary for publication Ordinance No. ____-21 An ordinance amending zoning code section 36-268 PUD 11 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard This ordinance states that the Zoning Code Section 36-268 PUD 11 will be amended. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: November 11, 2021 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 7 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Ordinance No. ____-21 An ordinance vacating a drainage and utility easement 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. ESG Architects, on behalf of SLP Park Ventures LLC, initiated the petition to vacate the drainage and utility easements. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on October 7, 2021 and mailed to abutting property owners, and the city council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the easements are not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said easements be vacated. Section 2. The following described easement is as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park and shown in Exhibits A and B, are vacated: The communication system easement as Document No. 4510515 on, under and across that part of Lot 4, Block 7, SHELARD PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota, described as follow: A strip of land 10.00 feet in width, the Northwesterly line of which is contiguous to the Northwesterly line of Lot 4, Block 7, SHELARD PARK, according to said plat on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Also a strip of land 30.00 feet in width, the West line of which is contiguous with the West line of said Lot 4. AND The underground easement filed as Document No. 3844615 under and across the following described property: The West 10 feet of the below described property; Lot 4, Block 7, Shelard Park, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said Hennepin County. Section 3. The city clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Register of Titles as the case may be. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect upon recording the final plat, and not sooner than fifteen days after its publication. First reading October 18, 2021 Second reading November 1, 2021 Date of publication November 11, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect November 26, 2021 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 8 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 9 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Exhibit A: communication system easement exhibit City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 10 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Exhibit B: underground easement exhibit City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 11 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Summary for publication Ordinance No. ____-21 An ordinance vacating utility easement 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard This ordinance states that easement located at 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard shall be vacated. This ordinance shall take effect upon recording the final plat, and not sooner than fifteen days after its publication. Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: November 11, 2021 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 12 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance amending conditions of approval for vacating right-of-way 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Whereas, the City Council approved Ordinance 2532-18 vacating right-of-way on March 19, 2018 as part of land use applications for redevelopment of property located at 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard; and Whereas, land use applications, including a preliminary and final plat for Bereks Additions, for a revised redevelopment proposal of the properties above have been submitted to the city by ESG Architects on behalf of SLP Park Ventures. Certain public utility mains that would have been relocated from the vacated right-of-way based on previous plans will now remain in place according to the revised plans; and Whereas, Ordinance 2532-18 has not been recorded and has not yet taken effect because conditions of approval have not yet been satisfied; and Whereas, one of the conditions of approval to relocate public utilities mains from the right-of-way to be vacated is no longer applicable. Whereas, The City of St. Louis Park proposes to amend the ordinance vacating right-of- way and the application has been duly filed. The notice of the application was published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on October 7, 2021 and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the right-of-way is not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said right-of-way be vacated. Now, therefore be it resolved that the following amendments shall be made to the City Code: Section 1. Section 4 of Ordinance 2532-18 is hereby amended by deleting strikethrough text and adding the following underlined text: This ordinance shall take effect upon relocation of the public utilities and recording the final plat, Bereks Addition, and not sooner than fifteen days after its publication. Section 2. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication. First reading October 18, 2021 Second reading November 1, 2021 Date of publication November 11, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect November 26, 2021 City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 13 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 14 Title: Second readings of ordinances for 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard redevelopment Summary for publication Ordinance No. ____-21 An ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2532-18 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard This ordinance states that Ordinance No. 2532-18, which vacated right-of-way at 9808 and 9920 Wayzata Boulevard, is amended to remove a condition that is no longer needed. This ordinance shall take effect upon recording the final plat, and not sooner than fifteen days after its publication. Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: November 11, 2021 Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4d Executive summary Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 5616 Vermont Street Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 5616 Vermont Street, St. Louis Park, Minnesota. P.I.D. 21-117-21-34-0035. Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with a policy previously established by the city council. Summary: Craig Bloomstrand, owner of the single-family residence at 5616 Vermont Street, has requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for his home and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy. The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like this is unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed, submitted, and approved by city staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $6,000. Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special assessment. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Jay Hall, utility superintendent Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Emily Carr, assessing technician Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 5616 Vermont Street Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 5616 Vermont Street, St. Louis Park, MN P.I.D. 21-117-21-34-0035 Whereas, the property owner at 5616 Vermont Street, has petitioned the City of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the single family residence located at 5616 Vermont Street; and Whereas, the property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and Whereas, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the utility superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The petition from the property owner requesting the approval and special assessment for the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted. 2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and specifications approved by the Operations and Recreation Department and Department of Inspections is hereby accepted. 3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $6,000. 4. The property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal from the special assessment, whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law. 5. The property owner has agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 3.50%. 6. The property owner has executed an agreement with the city and all other documents necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of all costs associated therewith. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4e Executive summary Title: Final payment resolution – Southeast Bikeways – Project No. 4018-2000 Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $21,596.60 for project no. 4018-2000 Southeast Mobility with GL Contracting Inc, Contract No. 87-20. Policy consideration: Not applicable. Summary: On Aug. 17, 2020, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of $347,676.50 to GL Contracting, Inc. for the Southeast Bikeways, project 4018-2000. The project included bikeways on Wooddale Avenue, Princeton Avenue, Quentin Avenue, Park Commons Drive, Wolfe Park and 38th Street. The final contract amount, $431,932.09, is $84,255.59 (24.2%) greater than the contract amount awarded. These overages were approved administratively, consistent with council adopted policy. Details on the contract changes are included in the discussion section of this report. Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor under Contract No. 87-20 has been calculated as follows: Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 347,676.50 Change orders/ extra work +$ 50,262.20 Cost increases +$ 33,993.39 Final contract cost $ 431,932.09 Previous payments -$ 410,335.49 Balance due $ 21,596.60 This project was included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Funding was provided by General Obligation Bonds. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, senior engineering project manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Final payment resolution – Southeast Bikeways – Project No. 4018-2000 Discussion Background: The Southeast Bikeways are a part of the city’s Connect the Park capital improvement plan (CIP). Connect the Park is designed to create a system that provides sidewalks approximately every 1/4-mile and bikeways every 1/2-mile to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the community. As in the case with most of the bikeways in the Connect the Park initiative, this transportation project is a retrofit project rather than a full reconstruction of the street. Reconstruction of any of these street segments is not on the current 10-year CIP. Instead, this project made improvements at key locations to further the city’s policy goals of safer travel for all modes of traffic. On Aug. 17, 2020, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of $347,676.50 to GL Contracting, Inc. for the Southeast Bikeways. The project included bikeways on Wooddale Avenue, Princeton Avenue, Quentin Avenue, Park Commons Drive, Wolfe Park and 38th Street. During construction, some unexpected items came up that added to the cost of the project. The additional work that was completed increased the cost of the contract by $84,255.59. There were change orders on the project and quantity increases during construction. This additional work was necessary to ensure there is quality street, bikeway, and sidewalk infrastructure for years to come and to address resident requests. The additional costs can be attributed to the following: •The construction of the bikeway along Park Commons Drive from Quentin Avenue to Princeton Lane required relocation of curb and removing a portion of the pavement on this road segment. During construction, it was determined that the condition of the pavement that would have been left in place was very poor. This segment of roadway was not on the city pavement rehabilitation schedule until 2026. Leaving it until 2026 would have likely resulted in potholes developing in the pavement that was not replaced. As a preventative measure and to reduce future disruption for the property owners, the full width of the pavement was replaced on this block at a cost of $50,000. •When the parking bay on Wooddale Avenue just south of 42 1/2 Street was installed, the resident at 4251 Wooddale Avenue was concerned about how the parking interacted with their driveway. To address this concern, we removed and replaced the bay to provide greater separation from the driveway. The cost for this work was $7,400. •The asphalt trail in Wolfe Park was expanded to improve safety by providing a wider merge area for the various trails near the REC Center entrance at a cost of $7,500. •Various concrete sidewalk panels were removed and replaced along Wooddale Avenue to remove trip hazards and damaged segments of walk at a cost of $8,300. •All the catch basin castings along the bike route were switched out to bicycle-safe grates at a cost of $4,500. •Through resident feedback and an audit of the corridor by staff, we added signs to the corridor. This included additional no parking signs, bike lane signs, upgrades to crosswalk signage and replacement of stop signs at a cost of $6,800. •It was determined that it would not be possible to maintain a safe pedestrian crossing of Wooddale near 42 1/2 Street during construction. To address this, we installed a temporary sidewalk and crossing to maintain the pedestrian route for the community for the duration of construction at this busy intersection. The cost for this work was $500. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 3 Title: Final payment resolution – Southeast Bikeways – Project No. 4018-2000 Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor under Contract No. 87-20 has been calculated as follows: Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 347,676.50 Change orders/ extra work +$ 50,262.20 Cost increases +$ 33,993.39 Final contract cost $ 431,932.09 Previous payments -$ 410,335.49 Balance due $ 21,596.60 The project, when awarded, included a $17,383.83 (5%) contingency for unexpected costs. The additional project cost of $84,255.59 is 24.2% over the award. This project was included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Funding was provided by General Obligation Bonds. Due to cost savings in other transportation projects, there are adequate funds to cover the additional costs incurred on this project. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 4 Title: Final payment resolution – Southeast Bikeways – Project No. 4018-2000 Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution authorizing final payment and accepting work for the Southeast Bikeways City Project No. 4018-2000 Contract No. 87-20 Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1.Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated August 19, 2020, GL Contracting Inc., has satisfactorily completed the Southeast Bikeways, as per Contract No. 87-20. 2.The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work. 3.The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost is $431,932.09. 4.The City Manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $21,596.60 on this contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4f Executive summary Title: Approve trail connection agreement with Three Rivers Park District on North Cedar Lake Trail Recommended action: Motion to authorize the mayor and city manager to execute the local trail connection agreement with Three Rivers Park District. Policy consideration: Does the city council support the continued use of the city’s connections to the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail? Summary: A version of this agreement was presented to council on Oct. 18. That agreement included three connections to the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail: • Existing trail access at Nelson Park that was not impacted by construction of the Dakota Edgewood trail bridge • Existing trail access at Dakota Park that was removed and is being replaced as part of the bridge construction • New temporary trail access at the east side of Dakota Park that was built as the regional trail detour during bridge construction During the discussion council directed staff to modify the agreement to remove the temporary trail connection that was created in the fall of 2020 to connect the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to the east side of Dakota Park. This trail was used as the detour route for regional trail users to safely bypass bridge construction activities. Now that construction is nearing completion the trail is no longer required and will be removed as part of the final grading. Three Rivers Park District is still requesting an access agreement for the remaining two trail connections to define ownership and maintenance of the existing trail connection. The updated agreement has been modified to removal the temporary trail connection along the east side of Dakota Park. Financial or budget considerations: The city has been maintaining and removing snow from these trail connections and this trail connection agreement does not have additional financial impacts to the city. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Local trail connection map Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, Sr. engineering project manager Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, interim deputy city manager/operations and recreation director Deb Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Title: Approve trail connection agreement with Three Rivers Park District on North Cedar Lake Trail Discussion Background: During the early stages of construction of the Dakota Edgewood trail bridge, the contractor constructed an asphalt trail along the east side of Dakota Park, connecting the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail to the east side of Dakota Park near the home plate of the northerly baseball field. The trail was used as a detour route multiple times during the construction of the bridge. This included several weeks over the winter to allow the contractor to pile drive and dig footings adjacent to the trail. The trail was anticipated to be removed at the end of the project due to the Three Rivers Park District's concern during project development with how this access might impact the regional trail. The Operations and Recreation department received positive feedback about this trail connection and asked engineering staff if we could keep the trail as a permanent connection. The connection had been in place for almost a year and has been proven to be a safe and well-used access to the regional trail. Three Rivers Park District supports allowing this trail connection to remain. During discussions with Three Rivers regarding the temporary trail access it was determined that no agreement was in place for the two trail accesses that were in place prior to construction starting. As a result, an agreement was drafted for all three accesses. This agreement was brought to council on Oct. 18. As a part of the discussion, council directed staff to remove the temporary trail access at the east side of Dakota Park that was built as the regional trail detour during bridge construction. The revised agreement includes two access locations to the North Cedar Lake Regional Trail at the following locations: • Existing trail access at Nelson Park that was not impacted by construction of the Dakota Edgewood trail bridge • Existing trail access at Dakota Park that was removed and will be replaced as part of the bridge construction The city currently owns and maintains these trail connections on city-owned land. The local trail access agreement formalizes these connections and does not change ownership or maintenance responsibilities of the trail connections. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 3 Title: Approve trail connection agreement with Three Rivers Park District on North Cedar Lake Trail Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution approving trail connections agreement with the Three Rivers Park District for the North Cedar Lake Trail Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably; and, Whereas, the North Cedar Lake Trail is a popular destination for pedestrians and bicyclists and is operated by Three Rivers Park District; and, Whereas, providing convenient and safe connections to the North Cedar Lake Trail from the St. Louis Park citywide system of bikeways, sidewalks and trails will make progress toward cleaner air, less traffic and noise, and more livable neighborhoods by promoting the use of low- carbon and no-carbon travel; and, Whereas, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park deems it proper and in the public interest to enter into an agreement with Three Rivers Park District to establish the connections to the North Cedar Lake Trail; and, Now therefore be it resolved, the mayor and city manager are hereby authorized and directed for and on behalf of the city to execute and enter into an agreement with the Three Rivers Park District for the North Cedar Lake Trail connections. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council November 1, 2021 Kim Keller, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk C:\srf-pw\dms26061\11523_Local Trail Connection.dwg : 8.5X11 VERTJob # 11523 / 1374610/20/2021 - 2:55PMLocal Trail Connection AgreementNorth Cedar Lake Regional Trail at Nelson and Dakota ParksSt. Louis Park, MinnesotaExhibit APage 4City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Approve trail connection agreement with Three Rivers Park District on North Cedar Lake Trail Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Public hearing: 6a-I Executive summary Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. There is no other formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the Special Service District No. 1 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2022 proposed budget and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has held meetings and reached out to the property owners in Special Service District No. 1 and received support for approving the 2022 budget and service charges. Financial or budget considerations: The parks maintenance budget will incur a service charge for the city-owned property located within this district at 3700 Monterey Drive (The Rec Center/Wolfe Park). The proposed service charge for 2022 is $25,308. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion Attachment “A” Proposed 2022 Budget Attachment “B” Proposed 2022 Service Charges Attachment “C” Map Prepared by: Mike Okey, public works services manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-I) Page 2 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Discussion Background: On Oct. 17, 2016, the city council approved a resolution imposing a multi-year service charge for Special Service District No. 1 (this district is located along Excelsior Boulevard from Quentin Avenue to Highway 100 and along Park Center Boulevard and Monterey Drive). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District property owners approved the proposed 2022 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Oct. 7 and Oct. 21, 2021. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 1 Financial Position Special Service District No. 1 has an anticipated 2021 year-end fund balance of approximately $54,845. Proposed 2021 Budget and Service Charges The property owners recommended approval of the following: • 2022 budget amount of $106,672; no change from 2021. • 2022 service charge amount of $96,672; no change from 2021. • In general, expenses do not typically reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 75% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. Present considerations: The Special Service Districts are a benefit to the businesses and city as they help maintain the improvements made in the district, promote a positive image of the business corridor, and attract customers to the area. Next steps: • On Nov. 15, 2021, the city council will be asked to adopt a resolution setting the 2022 Special Service District No. 1 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. • In late-November, the city certifies the 2022 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-I) Page 3 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #1 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2022 Adopted Budget 2021 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES $238 $240 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS $500 $500 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS $5,900 $5,900 6303 - OTHER $300 $300 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements $2,500 $2,500 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services $4,500 $4,500 6550 - Civil 750 - Civil $150 $150 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - snow removal 772 - SSD - snow removal $43,000 $43,000 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal $1,000 $1,000 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services $3,000 $3,000 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint $8,000 $8,000 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services $31,000 $31,000 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES $100 $100 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE $134 $132 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal $4,000 $4,000 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE $2,350 $2,350 TOTAL EXPENDITURES $106,672 $106,672 SSD#1 Budget City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-I) Page 4 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #1 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2022 Service Charges PROPOSED PROPOSED 2022 2021 LINE PID SERVICE SERVICE NO.NO.OWNER BUSINESS CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-33-0019 3601 Park Center Boulevard 36 Park LLC 36 Park LLC $3,389 $3,389 2 06-028-24-33-0015 3601 State Hwy No 100 South Target Corporation t-0260 Target Corporation $10,537 $10,537 3 06-028-24-34-0022 3700 Monterey Drive City of St. Louis Park Rec Center $25,308 $25,308 4 06-028-24-33-0014 3777 Park Center Boulevard Lund Food Holdings Lund Food Holdings $10,693 $10,693 6 07-028-24-22-0031 3800 Park Nicollet Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $6,811 $6,811 7 07-028-24-22-0035 3900 Park Nicollet Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $5,533 $5,533 8 07-028-24-21-0004 4916 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $1,698 $1,698 9 07-028-24-21-0005 4920 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $476 $476 10 07-028-24-21-0006 4950 Excelsior Boulevard Zip Printing Zip Printing $561 $561 11 07-028-24-21-0512 4951 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $1,504 $1,504 12 07-028-24-21-0513 4959 Excelsior Boulevard Frauenshuh Companies Frauenshuh Co.$1,295 $1,295 13 07-028-24-22-0023 4961 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.Miracle Mile $611 $611 14 07-028-24-22-0024 4995 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.Miracle Mile $804 $804 15 07-028-24-22-0032 5000 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $588 $588 16 07-028-24-22-0025 5001 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.Miracle Mile $577 $577 17 07-028-24-22-0033 5050 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $3,394 $3,394 18 07-028-24-22-0034 5100 Excelsior Boulevard Park Nicollet Health Services PNHS $1,437 $1,437 19 07-028-24-22-0037 5200 Excelsior Boulevard Tower Place Ltd Liability Co.Frauenshuh Co.$1,658 $1,658 20 07-028-24-22-0026 5201 Excelsior Boulevard Intercity Investments, Inc.Miracle Mile $8,425 $8,425 21 07-028-24-22-0036 5300 Excelsior Boulevard Frauenshuh Companies Frauenshuh Co.$5,979 $5,979 22 07-028-24-22-0004 5400 Auto Club Way AAA Minneapolis AAA $5,394 $5,394 $96,672 $96,672 Notes: 1)The proposed 2022 budget is $106,672, but the service charge is only $96,672 because $10,000 was transferred from reserves to maintain the proper fund balance. 2)For 2022, the proposed budget and service charges remain the same as in 2021. 3)The proposed 2022 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. a) Commercial sidewalk snow removal charges are on a front footage basis. b) All other services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. ADDRESS City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-I) Page 5 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 1 Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Public hearing: 6a-II Executive summary Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the Special Service District No. 2 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2022 proposed budget and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has held meetings and reached out to the property owners in Special Service District No. 2 and received support for approving the 2022 budget and service charges. Financial or budget considerations: The public works operations division budget will incur a service charge for the city-owned property located within this district at 3929 Excelsior Boulevard (bus shelter). The proposed service charge for 2022 is $37. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion Attachment “A” Proposed 2022 Budget Attachment “B” Proposed 2022 Service Charges Attachment “C” Map Prepared by: Mike Okey, public works services manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-II) Page 2 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Discussion Background: On Oct. 1, 2018, the city council approved a resolution imposing a multi-year service charge for Special Service District No. 2 (this district is located along Excelsior Boulevard from Monterey Drive/38th Street to France Avenue). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District property owners approved the proposed 2022 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Oct. 7 and Oct. 21, 2021. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 2 Financial Position Special Service District No. 2 has an anticipated 2021 year-end fund balance of approximately $50,757. Proposed 2022 Budget and Service Charges The property owners recommended approval of the following: • 2022 budget amount of $47,462; no change from 2021. • 2022 service charge amount of $33,462; no change from 2021. • In general, expenses do not typically reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 75% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. Present considerations: The Special Service Districts are a benefit to the city as they promote a positive image of the business corridor and to attract customers to the area. Next steps: • On Nov. 15, 2021, the city council will be asked to adopt a resolution setting the 2022 Special Service District No. 2 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. • In late-November, the city certifies the 2022 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-II) Page 3 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #2 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2022 Adopted Budget 2021 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 204.00 210.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 200.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 3,000.00 3,000.00 6303 - OTHER 1,000.00 1,000.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 500.00 500.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,000.00 2,000.00 6550 - Civil 750 - Civil 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD Site Maintenance 773 - SSD Site Maintenance 0.00 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 800.00 800.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 4,000.00 4,000.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 9,400.00 9,400.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 23,000.00 23,000.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 58.00 52.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,000.00 1,000.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,300.00 2,300.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 47,462.00 47,462.00 SSD#2 Budget City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-II) Page 4 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #2 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2021 Service Charges PROPOSED ACTUAL 2022 2021 LINE SERVICE SERVICE NO.PID NO.OWNER CHARGE CHARGE 1 06-028-24-41-0075 3900 Excelsior Blvd Ellipse on Excelsior LLC $5,353 $5,353 2 06-028-24-41-0077 3901 Excelsior Blvd Alberto Properties LLP $1,581 $1,581 3 06-028-24-41-0076 3924 Excelsior Blvd Ellipse II LLC $1,924 $1,924 4 06-028-24-41-0068 3925 Excelsior Blvd A & A Agency Inc.$620 $620 6 06-028-24-41-0067 3929 Excelsior Blvd City of St. Louis Park $37 $37 7 06-028-24-41-0014 3939 Excelsior Blvd Sara Son LLC $900 $900 8 06-028-24-41-0070 3947 Excelsior Blvd Wallack Properties LLC $1,514 $1,514 9 06-028-24-41-0008 4100 Excelsior Blvd Sela Roofing & Remodeling $1,096 $1,096 10 06-028-24-41-0009 4120 Excelsior Blvd Altus Business Development Properties $1,071 $1,071 11 06-028-24-44-0001 4140 Excelsior Blvd Larson Enterprises/Slumberland $1,853 $1,853 12 06-028-24-44-0176 4170 Excelsior Blvd 4150 Excelsior Blvd. Partnership $1,407 $1,407 13 06-028-24-44-0175 4200 Excelsior Blvd Stranik Brothers R/E LLC $1,199 $1,199 14 06-028-24-44-0173 4201 Excelsior Blvd AMF Properties LLC/Life Medical $1,799 $1,799 15 06-028-24-44-0088 4221 Excelsior Blvd Prima Investments LLC $253 $253 16 06-028-24-43-0017 4300 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $525 $525 17 06-028-24-43-0020 4301 Excelsior Blvd S & S Investments $1,106 $1,106 18 06-028-24-43-0018 4306 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $403 $403 19 06-028-24-43-0019 4308 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $537 $537 20 06-028-24-43-0021 4317 Excelsior Blvd Habitation Furnishing & Design $668 $668 21 06-028-24-43-0186 4320 Excelsior Blvd Lyndly F Opitz & Assoc $1,650 $1,650 22 06-028-24-43-0091 4331 Excelsior Blvd Bell Nelson Furniture $909 $909 23 06-028-24-43-0392 4400 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bancshares Inc $3,796 $3,796 24 06-028-24-43-0040 4409 Excelsior Blvd Samfar Real Estate Inc $633 $633 25 06-028-24-43-0041 4415 Excelsior Blvd Automotive Accessories LLC $522 $522 26 06-028-24-43-0042 4419 Excelsior Blvd Celine Properties LLC $1,149 $1,149 27 06-028-24-43-0391 4424 Excelsior Blvd Bridgewater Bank $957 $957 $33,462 $33,462 Notes: 1)The proposed 2022 budget is $47,462, but the service charge is only $33,462 because $14,000 was transferred from reserves to maintain the proper fund balance. 2)For 2022, the proposed budget and service charges remain the same. 3)The proposed 2022 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. 4)All services charges are based on the parcel's square foot area basis. ADDRESS City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-II) Page 5 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 2 Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Public hearing: 6a-III Executive summary Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 3 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. There is no formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the Special Service District No. 3 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2022 proposed budget and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has held meetings and reached out to the property owners in Special Service District No. 3 and received support for approving the 2022 budget and service charges. Financial or budget considerations: None. There are no city owned properties within this district. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion Attachment “A” Proposed 2022 Budget Attachment “B” Proposed 2022 Service Charges Attachment “C” Map Prepared by: Mike Okey, public works services manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-III) Page 2 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 3 Discussion Background: On Oct. 15, 2012, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 3 (located along Excelsior Boulevard from Quentin Avenue to Monterey Drive/W. 38th Street). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District property owners approved the proposed 2022 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Oct. 7 and Oct. 21, 2021. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 3 financial position Special Service District No. 3 has an anticipated 2021 year-end fund balance of approximately $24,337. Proposed 2022 budget and service charges The property owners recommended approval of the following: • 2022 budget amount of $51,597; no change from 2021. • 2022 service charge amount of $41,597; no increase from 2021. • In general, expenses do not typically reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 75% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. Present considerations: The Special Service Districts are a benefit to the city as they promote a positive image of the business corridor and to attract customers to the area. Next steps: • On Nov. 15, 2021, the city council will be asked to adopt a resolution setting the 2022 Special Service District No. 2 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. • In late-November, the city certifies the 2022 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-III) Page 3 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 3 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #3 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2022 Adopted Budget 2021 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 430.00 430.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 200.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 3,500.00 3,500.00 6303 - OTHER 1,500.00 1,500.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 500.00 500.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 2,500.00 2,500.00 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - snow removal 772 - SSD - snow removal 18,000.00 18,000.00 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 600.00 600.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,500.00 2,500.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 7,000.00 7,000.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 12,000.00 12,000.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 67.00 67.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,700.00 1,700.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,100.00 1,100.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 51,597.00 51,597.00 SSD #3 Budget City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-III) Page 4 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 3 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #3 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2022 Service Charges Proposed Actual 2022 2021 LINE NO.PID No.Address Business Owner Service Charge Service Charge 1 06-028-24-43-0191 4500 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $3,638 $3,638 2 07-028-24-12-0047 4501 Exc Blvd S & D Cleaners Laurel Properties $952 $952 3 07-028-24-12-0048 4509 Exc Blvd Lang Nelson Office Park Blvd LLP $1,694 $1,694 4 06-028-24-43-0192 4590 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Blakeley Props & Chalen LP ET AL $747 $747 6 07-028-24-12-0049 4601 Exc Blvd Park Blvd Office Bldg Park Blvd LLP $2,392 $2,392 7 07-028-24-12-0050 4611 Exc Blvd Dilly Lilly Diamond Group LLC $1,154 $1,154 8 07-028-24-12-0051 4615 Exc Blvd Judith McGrann & Friends Judith McGrann $996 $996 9 07-028-24-12-0052 4617 Exc Blvd Flower Fair 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,298 $1,298 10 07-028-24-12-0185 4630 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand LLC $5,885 $5,885 11 07-028-24-21-0009 4631 Exc Blvd Jennings Liquor 4617 Excelsior Blvd LLC $1,325 $1,325 12 07-028-24-21-0011 4701 Exc Blvd Steve's Park Amoco J & J Wolfe Properties LLC $2,111 $2,111 13 07-028-24-21-0012 4725 Exc Blvd Excelsior Office Bldg Excelsior Investments LLC $2,766 $2,766 14 07-028-24-21-0256 4730 Exc Blvd Retail/housing Excelsior & Grand LLC $6,874 $6,874 15 07-028-24-21-0514 4800 Exc Blvd Fresh Thyme Grocery 4900 Excelsior Apts $4,139 $4,139 16 07-028-24-21-0252 4801 Exc Blvd Loffhagen Insurance Gregory Loffhagen $1,312 $1,312 17 07-028-24-21-0015 4811 Exc Blvd Latitudes/Laundramat Fine Brothers $1,187 $1,187 18 07-028-24-21-0016 4821 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Properties LLC $649 $649 19 07-028-24-21-0017 4825 Exc Blvd German Autoworks Eastwood Properties LLC $646 $646 20 07-028-24-21-0031 4901 Exc Blvd Checks II DMM Holdings $669 $669 21 07-028-24-21-0032 4907 Exc Blvd Vogue Furniture Tique, Inc.$580 $580 22 07-028-24-21-0033 4911 Exc Blvd Old World Antiques J & F Reddy Rents Inc $583 $583 Total $41,597 $41,597 Notes: 1)The proposed 2022 budget is $51,597, but the service charge is only $41,597 because $10,000 was transferred from reserves to maintain the proper fund balance. 2)For 2022, the proposed budget and service charges remain the same. 3)The proposed 2022 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. a) Commercial sidewalk snow removal charges are based on the square foot of sidewalk in front of the property. b) All other services charges are based on the property's front footage. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-III) Page 5 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 3 Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Public hearing: 6a-IV Executive summary Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. There is no other formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the Special Service District No. 4 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2022 proposed budget and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has held meetings and reached out to the property owners in Special Service District No. 4 and received support for approving the 2022 budget and service charges. Financial or budget considerations: None. There are no city owned properties within this district. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion Attachment “A” Proposed 2022 Budget Attachment “B” Proposed 2022 Service Charges Attachment “C” Map Prepared by: Mike Okey, public works services manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-IV) Page 2 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Discussion Background: On Oct. 5, 2015, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 4 (located along Excelsior Boulevard west of Highway 100 to Louisiana Avenue). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The Special Service District property owners approved the proposed 2022 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Oct. 7 and Oct. 21, 2021. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 4 financial position Special Service District No. 4 has an anticipated 2021 year-end fund balance of approximately $7,046. Proposed 2022 budget and service charges The property owners recommended approval of the following: • 2022 budget amount of $26,935; no change from 2021. • 2022 service charge amount of $24,935; a $2,000 increase from 2021 to reflect a $2,000 reduction in transfer from reserves. • In general, expenses do not typically reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 75% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. Present considerations: The Special Service Districts are a benefit to the city as they promote a positive image of the business corridor and to attract customers to the area. Next steps: • On Nov. 15, 2021, the city council will be asked to adopt a resolution setting the 2022 Special Service District No. 4 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. • In late-November, the city certifies the 2022 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-IV) Page 3 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #4 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2022 Adopted Budget 2021 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 152.00 152.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 200.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 2,000.00 2,000.00 6303 - OTHER 500.00 500.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 500.00 500.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 1,250.00 1,250.00 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 500.00 500.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,500.00 3,500.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 3,000.00 3,000.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 11,000.00 11,000.00 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES 100.00 100.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 33.00 33.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,800.00 1,800.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 2,400.00 2,400.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 26,935.00 26,935.00 SSD #4 Budget City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-IV) Page 4 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #4 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2022 Service Charges Business Proposed Actual 2022 2021 PAR Service Service NO.PID #Owner Charge Charge 1 21-117-21-24-0019 5600 Excelsior Blvd Finished Basement Company $933 $858 2 21-117-21-24-0202 5608 Excelsior Blvd Helmut Mauer $707 $650 3 21-117-21-24-0141 5707 Excelsior Blvd New Concepts Mgt Group $949 $873 4 21-117-21-24-0193 5717 Excelsior Blvd LMC, Inc $820 $754 5 21-117-21-24-0040 5720 Excelsior Blvd Holiday Stationstores Inc.$1,023 $941 6 21-117-21-24-0161 5801 Excelsior Blvd Premier RE LLC $472 $434 7 21-117-21-24-0066 5804 Excelsior Blvd 5804 Excelsior Blvd., LLC $579 $533 8 21-117-21-24-0208 5809 Excelsior Blvd C.B.S. Real Est Prtnr II LLP $464 $426 9 21-117-21-24-0067 5810 Excelsior Blvd 5812 Excelsior Blvd. Co $665 $611 11 21-117-21-24-0185 5825 Excelsior Blvd Kil-Ben Excelsior, LLC $1,220 $1,122 12 21-117-21-24-0083 5900 Excelsior Blvd Realty Income Props 3 LLC $828 $762 13 21-117-21-23-0156 5916 Excelsior Blvd Rackner & Rackner $926 $851 14 21-117-21-23-0010 5922 Excelsior Blvd Muriel B. Frederick $170 $157 15 21-117-21-24-0195 5925 Excelsior Blvd Suntide Commercial Realty $1,265 $1,164 16 21-117-21-23-0011 5930 Excelsior Blvd Leonard C Riley $318 $293 17 21-117-21-23-0097 6001 Excelsior Blvd Sew What Corporation The Wicker Shop $451 $415 18 21-117-21-23-0127 6002 Excelsior Blvd Fitrz Inc $508 $468 19 21-117-21-23-0128 6006 Excelsior Blvd RRK LLC $262 $241 20 21-117-21-23-0100 6011 Excelsior Blvd Ward Properties $1,000 $920 21 21-117-21-23-0155 6100 Excelsior Blvd Moose Properties II, LLC $352 $324 22 21-117-21-32-0006 6111 Excelsior Blvd Excelsior 6111, LLC $963 $886 23 21-117-21-23-0130 6112 Excelsior Blvd Snyder Electric Co.$525 $483 24 21-117-21-32-0021 6121 Excelsior Blvd Hung LLC $565 $519 25 21-117-21-32-0022 6127 Excelsior Blvd Gregory White $380 $350 26 6200 6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd $2,672 $2,457 27 20-117-21-14-0026 6500 Excelsior Blvd Methodist Hospital $1,844 $1,696 28 20-117-21-41-0009 6600 Excelsior Blvd Methodist Hospital Methodist Hospital $3,339 $3,071 29 City Municipal Parking Lot City of St. Louis Park $735 $676 $24,935 $22,935 **6200 & 6250 Excelsior Blvd Charges 2022 2021 21-117-21-32-0133 6200 Excelsior Blvd 101 Ward Law Offices LTD $156 $143 21-117-21-32-0134 6200 Excelsior Blvd 102 Charles and Janice Woodson $162 $149 21-117-21-32-0135 6200 Excelsior Blvd 103 Laurie G Holasek $158 $144 21-117-21-32-0136 6200 Excelsior Blvd 104 Laurie G Holasek $177 $163 21-117-21-32-0137 6200 Excelsior Blvd 201 Dennis Schlutter $150 $138 21-117-21-32-0138 6200 Excelsior Blvd 202 Lois Schlutter $158 $146 21-117-21-32-0139 6200 Excelsior Blvd 203 Lois Schlutter $207 $190 21-117-21-32-0140 6200 Excelsior Blvd 204 Lois Schlutter $183 $168 21-117-21-32-0141 6250 Excelsior Blvd 101 Nemer Fieger & Assoc Inc $166 $153 21-117-21-32-0142 6250 Excelsior Blvd 102 LGH Properties LLC $155 $142 21-117-21-32-0143 6250 Excelsior Blvd 103 Mary Kenyon $169 $156 21-117-21-32-0144 6250 Excelsior Blvd 104 LGH Properties LLC $153 $141 21-117-21-32-0145 6250 Excelsior Blvd 201 James D Fieger $162 $149 21-117-21-32-0146 6250 Excelsior Blvd 202 Skads Travel Service Inc $148 $136 21-117-21-32-0147 6250 Excelsior Blvd 203 LGH Properties LLC $215 $198 21-117-21-32-0148 6250 Excelsior Blvd 204 Deborah Urista $153 $141 $2,672 $2,457 Notes *Denotes properties with a single street address but have sub-units that are independently owned. 1)The proposed 2022 budget is $26,935, but the service charge is only $24,935 because $2,000 was transferred from reserves to maintain the proper fund balance. 2)For 2022, the proposed budget remains the same but service charge increases because the transfer from reserves was reduced by $2,000. 3)The proposed 2022 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. Address City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-IV) Page 5 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 4 Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Public hearing: 6a-V Executive summary Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. There is no other formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the Special Service District No. 5 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2022 proposed budget and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has held meetings and reached out to the property owners in Special Service District No. 5 and received support for approving the 2022 budget. Financial or budget considerations: None. There are no city-owned properties within this district. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion Attachment “A” Proposed 2022 Budget Attachment “B” Proposed 2022 Service Charges Attachment “C” Map Prepared by: Mike Okey, public works services manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-V) Page 2 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Discussion Background: On Feb. 2, 2009, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 5 (located along Park Place Boulevard between I-394 and Cedar Lake Road). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charges. The special service district property owners approved the proposed 2022 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Oct. 7 and Oct. 21, 2021. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the district. Special Service District No. 5 financial position Special Service District No. 5 has an anticipated 2021 year-end fund balance of approximately $16,490. Proposed 2022 budget and service charges The property owners recommended approval of the following: • 2022 budget amount of $32,655; no change from 2021. • 2022 service charge amount of $32,655; a $2,000 increase from 2021 to reflect a $2,000 reduction in transfer from reserves. • In general, expenses do not typically reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 75% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. Present considerations:The special service districts are a benefit to the city as they promote a positive image of the business corridor and to attract customers to the area. Next steps: • On Nov. 15, 2021, the city council will be asked to adopt a resolution setting the 2022 Special Service District No. 5 budget and property owner service charges and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. • In late-November, the city certifies the 2022 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-V) Page 3 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #5 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2022 Adopted Budget 2021 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 222.00 222.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 200.00 200.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 4,000.00 4,000.00 6303 - SSD -Banner replacements 680 - SSD -Banner replacements 1,000.00 1,000.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 1,500.00 1,500.00 6630 - OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6630 - SSD - Banner install/removal 774 - SSD - Banner install/removal 1,600.00 1,600.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 3,000.00 3,000.00 6630 - SSD decorative install/maint 776 - SSD decorative install/maint 3,000.00 3,000.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 15,100.00 15,100.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 33.00 33.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 1,500.00 1,500.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,500.00 1,500.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 32,655.00 32,655.00 SSD #5 Budget City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-V) Page 4 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #5 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2022 Service Charges % of Proposed Actual Footage 2022 2021 PID Address Owner Business Service Charge Service Charge 04-117-21-31-0019 1500 Park Place Blvd Doubletree Hotel Doubletree Hotel 17.5%$5,721 $5,371 30-029-24-33-0031 1600 West End Blvd Shops at West End Shops at West End 17.3%$5,652 $5,306 04-117-21-34-0046 1620 Park Place Blvd IRC Retail Centers Roti & Leeann Chin 4.0%$1,299 $1,220 04-117-21-34-0045 1650 Park Place Blvd IRC Retail Centers Inland Commerical 4.7%$1,530 $1,437 04-117-21-34-0044 1690 Park Place Blvd James & Patricia Oslund Arby's 3.5%$1,152 $1,081 04-117-21-34-0049 1700 Park Place Blvd Costco Wholesale Fueling Station only 3.1%$1,019 $956 30-029-24-32-0022 5320 16th St W Shops at West End Cub 7.0%$2,281 $2,141 30-029-24-32-0026 5353 Wayzata Blvd Northco Commercial Real Estate Park National Bank 7.2%$2,350 $2,206 30-029-24-33-0011 5401 Gamble Dr The Excelsior Group Parkdale I - MEPC 12.6%$4,108 $3,856 30-029-24-33-0015 5402 Parkdale Dr The Excelsior Group Parkdale II - MEPC 4.2%$1,388 $1,303 04-117-21-34-0043 5600 Cedar Lake Rd IRC Retail Centers Office/Copy Max & Petsm 8.1%$2,644 $2,482 04-117-21-34-0050 5601 16th St W IRC Retail Centers Stormwater Pond 3.0%$991 $930 04-117-21-31-0018 5657 Wayzata Blvd KK Corporation Park Place Restaurants 3.7%$1,220 $1,145 04-117-21-34-0047 5699 16th St W IRC Retail Centers Lakeshore Learning Cente 4.0%$1,301 $1,221 Total:100.0%$32,655 $30,655 Notes: 1)The proposed 2022 budget and service charges are $32,655. 2)The propoposed budget remains the same but the service charges increased because the transfer from reserves was reduced by $2,000. 3)The proposed 2022 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-V) Page 5 Title: 2022 budget and property owner service charges for Special Service District No. 5 Meeting: City council Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Public hearing: 6a-VI Executive summary Title: 2022 budget and service for Special Service District No. 6 Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and close the public hearing. There is no other formal action required at this meeting. Formal action on the budget and service charges will be placed on the Nov. 15 council agenda. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the Special Service District No. 6 budget and property owner service charges? Summary: The 2022 proposed budget and service charges are similar to that of past years. Staff has held meetings and reached out to the property owners in Special Service District No. 6 and received support for approving the 2022 budget and service charges. Financial or budget considerations: The TIF / Admin budget will incur a service charge for the city-owned undeveloped property located within this district. The proposed service charge for 2022 is $1,869. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion Attachment “A” Proposed 2022 Budget Attachment “B” Proposed 2022 Service Charges Attachment “C” Map Prepared by: Mike Okey, public works services manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-VI) Page 2 Title: 2022 budget and service for Special Service District No. 6 Discussion Background: On June 15, 2009, the city council approved a resolution imposing a service charge for Special Service District No. 6 (located along 36th Street W. from Wooddale Avenue to Highway 100). Annually, the city council must set a service charge for the district following a public hearing on the proposed charge. The special service district property owners approved the proposed 2022 budget and service charges. The notice of public hearing was published on the city’s website and in the Sun Sailor on Oct. 7 and Oct. 21, 2021. The public hearing notice was sent to all property owners within the District. Special Service District No. 6 financial position Special Service District No. 6 has an anticipated 2021 year-end fund balance of approximately $42,910. Proposed 2022 budget and service charges The property owners recommended approval of the following: • 2022 budget amount of $27,400; no change from 2021. • 2022 service charge amount of $20,400; no change from 2021. • In general, expenses do not typically reach 100% of budget. The expected unused budget amount along with the service charges is anticipated to allow the district to achieve the goal of a 75% fund balance which staff and board agreed should be maintained. Present considerations: The Special Service Districts are a benefit to the city as they promote a positive image of the business corridor and to attract customers to the area. Next steps: • On Nov. 15, 2021, the city council will be asked to adopt a resolution setting the 2022 Special Service District No. 6 budget and property owner service charges, extending the district for another 10 years, and directing staff to certify the annual service charges to Hennepin County. • In late-November, the city certifies the 2022 assessments (service charges) to Hennepin County. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-VI) Page 3 Title: 2022 budget and service for Special Service District No. 6 Attachment A CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Special Service District #6 Account Subsidiary Proposed Budget 2022 Adopted Budget 2021 6212 - GENERAL SUPPLIES 217.00 217.00 6221 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 715 - SSD'S - IRRIGATION MATERIALS 500.00 500.00 6224 - LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 5,000.00 5,000.00 6303 - OTHER 1,000.00 1,000.00 6410 - SSD Mgmt Services 678 - SSD Mgmt Services 1,250.00 1,250.00 6630 - SSD Site Maintenance 773 - SSD Site Maintenance 500.00 500.00 6630 - SSD - Irrigation services 775 - SSD - Irrigation services 2,500.00 2,500.00 6630 - SSD - Landscape services 777 - SSD - Landscape services 12,250.00 12,250.00 6950 - LEGAL NOTICES 150.00 150.00 7106 - PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE 33.00 33.00 7207 - SSD infrastructure repair 880 - Infrastructure Repair-Internal 3,000.00 3,000.00 7301 - ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,000.00 1,000.00 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 27,400.00 27,400.00 SSD #6 Budget City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-VI) Page 4 Title: 2022 budget and service for Special Service District No. 6 CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK Attachment B Special Service District #6 Estimated Annual Cost Per Parcel Proposed 2022 Service Charges LINE Proposed Actual NO.2022 2021 PID Address Owner Service Charge Service Charge 1 16-117-21-34-0607 3601 Wooddale Ave TowerLight Senior Living $3,531 $3,531 2 16-117-21-34-0015 5500 36th St. W.SLMB LLC $453 $453 3 16-117-21-34-0355 5600 36th St W Tammy Medina c/o KAMI Inc $3,304 $3,304 4 16-117-21-34-0611 5605 36th St W 36th Street LLC $3,144 $3,144 6 16-117-21-34-0072 5701 36th St W M A Lerner & S O Lerner $1,180 $1,180 7 16-117-21-34-0040 5708 36th St W Standal Properties Inc $1,869 $1,869 8 16-117-21-34-0071 5718 36th St W M A Lerner & S O Lerner $623 $623 9 16-117-21-34-0077 5721 36th St W Evan Johnson c/o Thermetic Products $1,312 $1,312 10 16-117-21-34-0038 5724 36th St W LRJ of Minnesota Ltd Partnership $623 $623 11 16-117-21-34-0046 5727 36th St W R & SA Investment LLC $623 $623 12 16-117-21-34-0068 5802 36th St W Standal Properties Inc $1,869 $1,869 13 16-117-21-31-0610 5950 36th St W City of St. Louis Park $1,869 $1,869 Total $20,400 $20,400 Notes: 1)The proposed 2022 budget is $27,400, but the service charge is only $22,400 because $5,000 was transferred from reserves to maintain the proper fund balance. 2)For 2022, the proposed budget and service charges remained the same. 3)The proposed 2022 service charge calculations are based upon the same methodology used for the initial service charge collection. City council meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 6a-VI) Page 5 Title: 2022 budget and service for Special Service District No. 6 Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: November 1, 2021 Discussion item: 1 Executive summary Title: Smoking restrictions on restaurant/bar/distillery outdoor patio spaces Recommended action: No action required. Staff is providing background information and data on outdoor smoking restriction policies for council consideration. Policy consideration: • Does the City Council wish to pursue business and restaurant education around how to reduce or eliminate secondhand smoking impacts for staff and patrons that do not rely on additional regulation? • Does the City Council wish to amend city code to implement restrictions on the outdoor smoking of tobacco and tobacco products at food and beverage establishments? Summary: The Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (MCIAA) does not prohibit outdoor smoking, regardless of the proximity to building openings including doors and windows, or for outdoor seating in service establishments. Local governments are authorized to adopt and enforce more restrictive measures to protect individuals from secondhand smoke. An ordinance that requires no smoking areas but does not prohibit smoking in outdoor seating areas will not eliminate the risks of secondhand smoke to employees. Currently, few cities in Minnesota have adopted smoking restriction ordinances around outdoor seating in service establishments. Instead, restaurants have largely addressed the issue through their business models. A limited review of food and beverage establishments in the City of St. Louis Park finds that most businesses already prohibit or restrict smoking in outdoor seating areas and only one of the reviewed establishments was found to have no restrictions. St. Louis Park has limited enforcement authority over the food and beverage businesses, especially those without a liquor license. Additionally, complaints about individuals smoking would result in police response and potential ticket against the individual, not the business. Based on staff’s market review and enforcement limitations, an ordinance adopted to restrict smoking will likely have minimal overall impact. An alternate solution is to direct staff’s educational efforts to reduce or eliminate secondhand smoking impacts. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Michael Pivec, property maintenance & licensing manager Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, director of building & energy Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager Special study session meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 2 Title: Smoking restrictions on restaurant/bar/distillery outdoor patio spaces Discussion Background: The Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act (MCIAA) prohibits smoking in many indoor places and was amended in 2007 under the Freedom to Breathe Act to include bars and other food or liquor establishments. In 2019, the MCIAA was amended again to expand the definition of smoking to include vaping (the use of electronic delivery devices for nicotine). The MCIAA does not prohibit outdoor smoking. The MCIAA does authorize local units of government to limit or prohibit smoking in outdoor areas. The MCIAA interprets outdoor area as those areas that do not meet the definition of an indoor area which is defined in Minnesota Statute Section 144.413. Subd. 1a. Indoor area. “Indoor area” means all space between a floor and a ceiling that is bounded by walls, doorways, or windows, whether open or closed, covering more than 50 percent of the combined surface area of the vertical planes constituting the perimeter of the area. A wall includes any retractable divider, garage door, or other physical barrier, whether temporary or permanent. A 0.011 gauge screen with an 18 by 16 mesh count is not a wall. OSHA does not provide specific regulations to employees’ exposure to secondhand smoke. Employees are protected under OSHA rules regarding air quality, but tobacco smoke exposure rarely reaches a level exceeding OSHA standards. Smoking restrictions do provide a means to mitigate the harmful effects of secondhand smoke to the public and employees. St. Louis Park was an early leader in working to reduce secondhand tobacco exposure in restaurants. Before the MCIAA was amended in 2007, the city began a tobacco disclosure notice program for food and beverage establishments, consisting of entrance signage and testing for establishments that elected to not go smoke free. In recent years city tobacco sale license requirements have been implemented by council to help reduce tobacco usage by increasing the age to purchase and limiting sales of flavored products. Present considerations: Following preliminary council discussion, staff researched which other cities and counties in Minnesota had adopted an ordinance further restricting smoking and electronic cigarettes specifically for outdoor seating areas of food and beverage establishments. The table below outlines those findings. Cities not listed were not identified as having smoking regulations above and beyond MCIAA. City or County Outdoor Food & Bar 100% smoke free Outdoor Food & Bar 50% smoke free Aitkin X Austin X Cambridge X Hutchinson X Litchfield X Golden Valley X Bloomington X Carlton Cty X Ramsey Cty X Note: Some of the information for the table above was sourced by ANRF (American Nonsmokers’ Rights Foundation). Special study session meeting of November 1, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 3 Title: Smoking restrictions on restaurant/bar/distillery outdoor patio spaces The requirements also typically include the posting of signage identifying the outdoor space, or portions of, as a no-smoking area. Currently Hennepin County Environmental Health is the licensing authority for food and beverage establishments in St. Louis Park, giving the city limited enforcement authority over the business. That said, the Building and Energy department may enforce a signage code violation against the business. Additionally, multiple, validated complaints against a business with a liquor license could be subject to adverse license action. St. Louis Park would not have licensing authority in situations of where a food and beverage establishment does not have a liquor license. Specific complaints generated about individuals smoking would result in police response and potential ticket against the individual, not the business. A survey of a number of city establishments with outdoor seating areas was completed to discover the scope of the issue. The following smoking policies were reported: Establishment No Smoking Limited Smoking Smoking not restricted Crave X Rojo X Block X Park Tavern X McCoys X Bunny’s X The table above indicates that most establishments in St. Louis Park already prohibit or limit smoking in outdoor seating areas. Adoption of a new ordinance would have limited impact to food and beverage establishments. Next steps: If council would like staff to pursue additional education with businesses, staff would reach out to those food and beverage establishments currently allowing smoking in outdoor areas and provide public health information regarding the harmful effects of secondhand smoke to individuals and employees to encourage them to go smoke free. If council would like staff to pursue considering adopting a code limiting outside tobacco and tobacco product use, staff will discuss effectiveness of different ordinance models with other jurisdictions and work with our city attorney, police department, clerk’s office, and the business community on a recommendation to present to council.