HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/10/11 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionAGENDA
OCT. 11, 2021
The St. Louis Park City Council is meeting in person in accordance with the most recent COVID-
19 guidelines. Members of the public may attend the Oct. 11, 2021 meeting, in person at St.
Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. The meeting may also be viewed live via webstream
at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17/HD channel 859). Visit
bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda.
6:30 p.m. STUDY SESSION – community room
Discussion items
1. 6:30 p.m. 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
2. 8:00 p.m. Anti-idling research and recommendations
3. 8:30 p.m. Upcoming study session agenda
8:35 p.m. Communications/updates (verbal)
8:40 p.m. Adjourn
Written reports
4. Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy
5. COVID-19 local business assistance update
The agenda is posted on Fridays on the official city bulletin board in the lobby of city hall and on the text
display on civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s
website. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952-924-2525.
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: October 11, 2021
Discussion item: 1
Executive summary
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Recommended action: No formal action required. This report is to guide the study session
discussion regarding the 2022 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP), utility rates and budget.
Policy consideration:
•Does council support the CIP as presented (see the 2022-2026 capital plan by department)?
•Does the council support the proposed rate increases for 2022 for each utility fund (see the
2022 proposed utility rates)?
•Is council comfortable with a 5.58% final levy that includes components as outlined in this
report?
Summary: Staff will 1) provide background information, 2) recap the 2022 budget decisions-to-
date, 3) outline 2022 budget components (including operating assumptions, recommended
service level improvements, CIP, and utility funds), and 4) review the relationship between the
components and the final budget.
Staff have produced a recommended 2022 budget with a 5.58% general levy increase that
includes the following: a Housing and Rehabilitation Authority (HRA) levy at $1,517,799, an
Economic Development Authority levy at $500,000, a proposed capital plan, proposed utility
rates, and service level improvements that meet our Vision 3.0 priorities.
Financial or budget considerations: The CIP and Long-Range Financial Management Plan work
in conjunction with the city’s annual budgeting process in helping to determine an appropriate
property tax, HRA levy, and EDA levy. This also aids in maintaining the City’s AAA bond rating.
Strategic priority consideration: All areas of the adopted strategic priorities are impacted by
the city’s budget. St. Louis Park is committed to:
•being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive
community for all.
•continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
•providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood-oriented development.
•providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably,
safely and reliably.
•creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: Discussion
2022 proposed utility rates
2022-2026 capital plan by department
Prepared by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer
Reviewed by: Cindy Walsh, interim deputy city manager/operations & recreation director
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Discussion
Background
Background information in this report includes historic levy trends, highlighted information
about outcomes with our current service level investment and updated financial projections.
Historic levy trends
The historical average of our final levy increase is approximately 5.2%.
Current service levels
Our levy allows us to provide high quality, responsive service to residents. Some recent
highlights of outstanding service the city provides include:
•Our community development department aids hundreds of small businesses annually
and applies for grant funds on behalf of major development projects. A current example
is the $4 million in contamination cleanup, Transit Oriented Development, and livable
communities’ grants secured for St. Louis Park developments.
•The Police Department responds to over 50,000 calls for service yearly, or 1 call every 10
minutes
•Inspections division completes over 22,000 inspections a year with a turnaround time of
72 hours (many are completed within 24 hours)
•More than 40,000 people visit the aquatic park and nearly 8,000 visit the splash pad
annually
•Operations maintains over 227 miles of street with 1,800 streetlights, over 8,500 street
signs, 70 miles of pavement striping and over 4,000 pavement markings.
•Engineering rehabilitates approximately 7 miles of streets each year, or 4.6% of our total
street mileage
•The Fire department receives over 4,400 calls for service a year for emergency and non-
emergency medical response, structure fires, car accidents and fire alarms. They also
perform over 700 inspections, and issue over 300 fire protection permits.
•Facilities division has been enhancing protection of staff and guests to city buildings
though regular sanitizing, installing shields, supplying personal protective equipment
(PPE), and HVAC modifications
•Sustainability division supported the installation of six new Level 2 EV Chargers at The
Rec Center and at Westwood Hills Nature Center
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
•Operations mows 450 acres of grass weekly in the summer and plows 10 miles of
regional trails, along with numerous park trails in the winter
•Elections serves 37,567 registered voters in the City
•Race equity works with 28 active neighborhood associations out of 35 geographic
neighborhoods
•Over 37,000 phone calls are answered at the city hall front desk annually
•Human resources receives around 2,500 applications for open positions each year and
has more than 600 active employees throughout the year
2022 Budget decisions-to-date
On September 20, 2021, Council passed three preliminary levies.
2022 Preliminary general levy
The 2022 preliminary general levy has been set at 6.5%. This is an increase of $2,360,495 over the
2021 levy. The primary driver of the levy is debt service on the Dakota Bridge project, increases to
capital items from supply chain demands, and inflationary increases including staffing costs.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 4
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
The preliminary general levy was passed along with direction to look for ways to ultimately
approve a lower levy increase while keeping in place the service level residents and businesses
expect.
HRA levy
The preliminary Housing and Rehabilitation Authority levy was set at the maximum allowed
.0185% of estimated market value, which is consistent with previous years. In 2022 this equates
to an estimated $1,517,799. Per council direction, approximately $400,000 will be used for
housing staff salaries, with the balance of the levy proceeds placed in the city’s housing trust
fund.
EDA levy
A preliminary Economic Development Authority levy was approved for $500,000 or
approximately .00610% of estimated market value. This is lower than the maximum allowed,
which would bring in an estimated $1,487,442. This levy will be used to fund our climate
investment initiatives around commercial businesses ($300,000) and salaries in the
development fund ($200,000).
2022 budget components
At a very high level, a city’s annual budget consists of general fund (operational) expenditures
and capital expenditures. The proposed budget for any given year is also crafted around the long-
range financial plan and a number of built-in assumptions around spending. Due to ARPA funding,
the years 2023-2026 will have an additional key component to factor in. Earlier in the 2022
budget development process, staff anticipated needing ARPA funds for 2022 expenditures. This is
no longer the case and ARPA funding will be discussed at a council study session in early 2022.
Operating assumptions around spending
Currently, the following assumptions are included in 2022 budget planning:
•Service levels for the public remain at 2021 levels, with recommended additions as
outlined below. These additions are recommended to be funded with dollars health
care expenditure savings.
•The Capital Improvement Plan is funded as laid out in the 2022-2026 capital plan by
department.
•$300,000 budgeted for climate programs from the EDA levy
•The policy of budgeting for a 45% general fund balance continues
•Proposed general fund balance transfers will be approved by the council at the Oct. 18
meeting (support for this given by council members at Aug. 23, 2021 study session)
Drawing from the approved long-range financial plan, additional, longer-term assumptions are
also made, including:
•Redistribute Tax Increment (65%) from districts where obligations are paid off, but the
Council retains a portion (35%) for affordable housing.
•Realign commercial and industrial franchise fees to reduce future residential fee
increases. Proposed increases every other year.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 5
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Proposed service level improvements
To live our Vision 3.0 priorities, keep up with service demands and respond to State mandates,
the following ongoing expenses are recommended in 2022. These expenses are recommended
to be paid for by health care expenditure savings.
•New sustainability specialist ($90,676): To assist in the creation and implementation of
engagement initiatives for the advancement of sustainability and the Climate action
plan.
•New dispatch supervisor ($113,239): Will manage training and skills for department
ensuring our response model is efficient and coordinate with aftercare providers to
maintain continuity. This position keeps the department in compliance with new State
mandates around mental health care.
•Increased mental health professional services in both police and fire departments
($31,000): Adult behavioral health social workers are utilized when an individual could
benefit from social service support. These dollars supplement current hours to bring
positions to full time status.
•Increased hours for race equity program specialist ($15,703): Further support to Racial
Equity Manager supporting strategic priorities around being a leader in racial equity and
inclusion. These dollars supplement current hours to bring position to full time status.
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Each spring, staff is asked to determine the needs of the city and their respective departments
regarding purchases or construction of capital items. Generally speaking, a capital item has a cost
greater than $10,000 and a useful life of 3 years or more. The CIP is adopted and updated annually.
As departments prepare their respective CIPs, they are asked to consider the importance of the
capital needs and classify them as follows:
1)Have to do: required by mandate or to maintain a system or business need.
2)Smart to do: makes sound business sense and/or anticipates opportunities and takes
advantage of them.
3)Would like to do: if resources became available or are made available, it would make
business sense but not as critical as higher level items.
Staff also takes into consideration policy direction from Vision 3.0 strategic priorities, climate
action plan, racial equity and inclusion and the comp plan when reviewing projects, purchases,
programs and planning in the CIP and other budget areas.
Staff has actively increased and decreased projects to work within the preliminary 2022 budget.
Pavement management fund was reduced approximately $1 million, this is due to commercial
street rehab moving to 2023. Fleet reduction was a little over $400,000; this was accomplished
by moving a sweeper and other vehicles to future years. Additionally, the park fund increased
approximately $100,000 due to inflation of scheduled projects. The capital replacement fund
increased approximately $700,000 due to moving cost for Rec Center solar to 2022 (as discussed
at the Aug. 23 and Oct. 4, 2021 study session) and inflation of current projects. Staff continues to
review projects for 2022 to balance needs with budget availability.
Each year, the draft CIP is presented to council during the budget process for review and
adoption. The 2022-2026 capital plan by department lays out the 2022 draft CIP.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 6
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Utility rates
The city is utilizing the updated rate study model done by Ehlers and Associates to determine
utility rate increases. Recommended utility rates are in the 2022 proposed utility rates. The
study took a broad look at the operations and capital needs of the utility funds and if the if the
updated tier structure distributes cost in the manner we identified with the 2018 rate study.
In addition to the bullets below, the recommended increases across all four funds also include
asset management software as a capital expense.
Water Fund (4.5% recommended increase)
•Base fee covers fixed costs. Varies by meter size.
•750 gallons = one unit of water
•Rates increase as residents use more water, to promote conservation
•Capital projects in 2022 include local street rehab, and water well rehab
•Suggested increase of 4.5% annually through 2031
Sanitary Sewer Fund (3.5% recommended increase)
•Base charge covers fixed cost
•Rates are the same for residential and commercial properties
•Capital projects in 2022 include 36th & Wooddale street rehab, and sanitary sewer
lining
•Suggested increase of 3.5% annually through 2031
Storm Drainage/Stormwater Fund (6% recommended increase)
•Billed by residential equivalent factor, per city code
•Residential equivalent factors adjust stormwater runoff for non-single-family
properties to the appropriate share of water runoff that goes into the storm sewer
system
•Capital projects in 2022 include local street rehab, and rainwater rewards
•Suggested increase of 6% annually through 2031
Solid Waste Fund (5.25% recommended increase)
•Rates include garbage, recycling, organics, and yard waste (rates are per contract)
•Phasing out smallest garbage cart size (20 gallon) by September 2023
o Cost to provide 20-gallon garbage carts exceeds the fee that is being
collected from customers
o Customers who generate a small amount of garbage can utilize the every-
other- week collection service. Customers who current have 20-gallon weekly
service and elect for 30-gallon bi-weekly service will see a small decrease in
their solid waste bill.
•Suggested increase of 5.25% annually through 2031
The final impact
The final impact on taxpayers in 2022 will be a combination of levies (i.e. general, HRA, and EDA
(assuming it passes)) and fees (i.e. utility and franchise). Staff’s recommended 2022 general levy
increase is 5.58%. Scenarios at different levy increase rates and for single family homes,
apartment buildings, and commercial buildings are below.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 7
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
For the median valued single-family home, current projections are below.
Recommended levy increase
Additional levy increase options
For the median valued apartment building, current projections are below.
Recommended levy increase
total change
Levy Change 5.58%
Estimated city taxes 1,407.03$ 154.38$
Estimated utility rates (median user)1,374.84$ 60.04$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)162.00$ -$
Total per year 2,943.87$ 214.42$
Total per month 245.32$ 17.87$
Snapshot of impacts on median value home ($330,500)
total change
Levy Change 4.50%
Estimated city taxes 1,392.38$ 120.40$
Estimated utility rates (median user)1,374.84$ 60.04$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)162.00$ -$
Total per year 2,929.22$ 180.44$
Total per month 244.10$ 15.04$
Snapshot of impacts on median value home ($330,500)
total change
Levy Change 6.50%
Estimated city taxes 1,420.10$ 167.45$
Estimated utility rates (median user)1,374.84$ 60.04$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)162.00$ -$
Total per year 2,956.94$ 227.49$
Total per month 246.41$ 18.96$
Snapshot of impacts on median value home ($330,500)
total change
Levy Change 5.58%
Estimated city taxes 10,552.00$ 290.77$
Estimated utility rates (median user)17,301.36$ 680.20$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)1,164.00$ -$
Total per year 29,017.36$ 970.97$
Total per month 2,418.11$ 80.91$
Snapshot of impacts on median value apartment building (class C)
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 8
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Additional levy increase options
For the median valued commercial building, current projections are below.
Recommended levy increase
Additional levy increase options
total change
Levy Change 4.50%
Estimated city taxes 10,448.00$ 186.77$
Estimated utility rates (median user)17,301.36$ 680.20$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)1,164.00$ -$
Total per year 28,913.36$ 866.97$
Total per month 2,409.45$ 72.25$
Snapshot of impacts on median value apartment building (class C)
total change
Levy Change 6.50%
Estimated city taxes 10,646.00$ 384.77$
Estimated utility rates (median user)17,301.36$ 680.20$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)1,164.00$ -$
Total per year 29,111.36$ 1,064.97$
Total per month 2,425.95$ 88.75$
Snapshot of impacts on median value apartment building (class C)
total change
Levy Change 5.58%
Estimated city taxes 3,665.73$ 64.73$
Estimated utility rates (median user)38,535.36$ 1,601.76$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)3,564.00$ -$
Total per year 45,765.09$ 1,666.49$
Total per month 3,813.76$ 138.87$
Snapshot of impacts on median value commercial building ($637,000)
total change
Levy Change 4.50%
Estimated city taxes 3,629.73$ 28.73$
Estimated utility rates (median user)38,535.36$ 1,601.76$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)3,564.00$ -$
Total per year 45,729.09$ 1,630.49$
Total per month 3,810.76$ 135.87$
Snapshot of impacts on median value commercial building ($637,000)
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Page 9
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Next Steps
Below is a summary of upcoming discussions:
Oct. 18 Council meeting: Approve 2021 fund balance transfers, fund creation, and fund
closures
Nov. 1 Council meeting: Public hearing: first reading utility rates and fee increases 2022
Nov. 15 Council meeting: Adopt fee schedule including utility rates 2022
Dec. 6 Council meeting: Public hearing: Truth in Taxation, budget presentation 2022
Dec. 20 Council meeting: Council adopts 2022 Budgets, final tax levies (City, HRA, and EDA),
and 2022 - 2031 CIP
total change
Levy Change 6.50%
Estimated city taxes 3,723.00$ 122.15$
Estimated utility rates (median user)38,535.36$ 1,601.76$
Estimated franchise fee (no change)3,564.00$ -$
Total per year 45,822.36$ 1,723.91$
Total per month 3,818.53$ 143.66$
Snapshot of impacts on median value commercial building ($637,000)
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARKESTIMATED QUARTERLY UTILITY BILL ACTUAL 2017 AND PROPOSED 2018 Household Size4Water ‐ Units per quarter30Sewer ‐ Units per quarter20Solid Waste Service60‐gallonMeter size3/4 inchActual Proposed Dollar PercentService Type2021 2022 Change Change NotesWaterPer unit rate ‐ Tier 12.07$ 2.16$ 0.09$ 4.50%Per unit rate ‐ Tier 22.51$ 2.62$ 0.11$ 4.50%Per unit rate ‐ Tier 33.01$ 3.15$ 0.14$ 4.50%Service charge38.06$ 39.77$ 1.71$ 4.50%State testing fee**2.43$ 2.43‐$ 0.00%Consumption74.43$ 77.78$ 3.35$ 4.50%SewerBase service charge20.09$ 20.79$ 0.70$ 3.50%Per unit3.92$ 4.06$ 0.14$ 3.50%Consumption78.40$ 81.14$ 2.74$ 3.50%Storm DrainageService charge26.27$ 27.85$ 1.58$ 6.00%Bassett Creek Fee*1.93$ 2.32$ 0.39$ 20.00% Bassett Creek feeSolid Waste (includes taxes and fees)85.92$ 90.43$ 4.51$ 5.25%Total Bill without Bassett*325.60$ 340.20$ 14.60$ 4.48% Not including BCWMCIncrease per quarter (dollars)14.60$ 58.39 Increase per month (dollars)4.87$ 58.39 * Since not all property owners would be charged this fee, it is not included in the dollar orpercentage change in total bill**Pass through fee to Minnesota Department of HealthPage 10 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1) Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Capital Improvement Program
City of St. Louis Park, MN
PROJECTS BY DEPARTMENT
2022 2026thru
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026DepartmentProject # Priority
Buildings
31230001 25,00025,000City Hall ITE & Gould Elect Panel Replacement 3
31240001 35,00035,000City Hall Generator Head Gasket 1
31240002 8,0008,000City Hall Stair Carpet Replacement 5
31240004 85,00085,000City Hall Bridge 3
31240005 10,00010,000City Hall/Police Campus Landscaping 1
31240006 35,00035,000City Hall 2nd Floor Celing Tile Replacement 5
31240007 25,00025,000City Hall EV Chargers for Fleet 3
31250001 200,000200,000CH Windows, Ext. Coatings and Caulking Replacement n/a
31250002 15,00015,000City Hall Window Blinds 5
31250003 80,00080,000City Hall Timber Retaining Walls 1
31260001 35,00035,000City Hall First Floor Carpet Replacement 3
31260002 100,000100,000CH Access Control System Replacement, City Wide 3
32180004 20,00020,000Police Parking and Training Feasability Study 3
32220002 25,00025,000Police Report Writing Room Remodel 3
32220003 85,00085,000Police Station Remodel Restrooms 1
32220004 15,00015,000Police Station Entry Planter Brick Face 3
32220005 10,00010,000Police Lobby Furniture 1
32220006 5,0005,000Police Station Evidence Gate Doorway 3
32240001 250,000250,000Police Station Exterior Bullet Resistant Glass 3
32240002 25,00025,000Police Station Blind Replacement 3
32240004 140,000140,000PD Indivdual Office 3
32240005 38,00038,000Police Station VAV Replacement 1
32250001 15,00015,000Police Station Exercise Equipment Replacement 5
32250002 20,00020,000Police Station Replace Ceiling Tile 3
32250003 15,00015,000Police Station Range Targeting System 5
32250004 50,00050,000Police Parking Gate 5
32260001 90,00090,000Police Station Replace Carpet 3
33140002 45,00015,000 15,000 15,000MSC & Fire Stations CO Nox Sensor Replacement 1
33220001 70,00070,000MSC 2nd Bay-Sealant 3
33220002 11,00011,000MSC Campus Landscaping 3
33220003 10,00010,000MSC Natural Resources Manager Office 3
33230002 250,000250,000MSC Heat Exchanger Ventilation 3
33230004 20,00020,000MSC Traffic Shop Floor Sealant 5
33230005 20,00020,000MSC Convert Exterior HID to LED 3
33230006 50,00050,000MSC 3rd Bay Sealant and Stripping 1
33240001 45,00045,000MSC Bays LED Upgrade 3
33250001 25,00025,000MSC Paint Booth Maintenance 3
33250003 600,000600,000MSC Bays 1, 2 & 3 Roofing 3
33260001 12,00012,000MSC Replace HVAC Controls 3
34160002 120,000120,000Fire Stations 1 & 2 Apparatus bay floor coating 1
34220001 35,00035,000Fire Stations Replace Exercise Equipment 5
34220002 15,00015,000Fire 1&2 Mattresses 3
34230004 250,000250,000Fire Station 1 Decontamination Laundry 3
34240001 10,00010,000Fire Station #1 and #2 Landscaping 1
34240002 18,00018,000Fire 1&2 Water Heaters 3
34240003 10,00010,000Fire Station #2 Water Heater Replacement 3
Wednesday, October 6, 2021Page 12021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Page 11 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1)
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026DepartmentProject # Priority
34240004 35,00035,000FS #1 and #2 Carpet Replacement 1
34240005 12,00012,000Fire Stations Replace HVAC Controls 5
34240006 45,00045,000Fire Station # 1 Entry Canopy 3
34250001 50,00050,000Fire Station #1 Training Tower modifications 5
34260001 60,00060,000Fire Station #1 light fixture replacements 1
35250001 45,00045,000Fire Station #2 Replace light fixtures 1
36220001 20,00020,000Westwood Fresh Air Cross Ventilation 3
36260001 20,00020,000Westwood Multi-purpose Rooms Tile 3
36260002 12,00012,000Westwood Replace Projectors 3
37220001 485,000485,000Rec Center Solar 3
3,856,000705,000 700,000 872,000 1,235,000 344,000Buildings Total
Cable TV
11151002 20,00020,000Van Camera Cases 3
11151003 13,00013,000Van Camera Cables 3
11151007 10,00010,000Tripods for On Location 3
11172007 40,00040,000Council Chambers HD pan/tilt cameras 1
11191009 35,00035,000Replacement edit systems 1
11201001 140,000140,000Van Cameras 3
11201002 20,00020,000Van Camera Cases 3
11201003 13,00013,000Van Camera Cables 3
11201010 12,00012,000Tripods for On Location 1
11201015 14,00014,000Production switcher 1
317,00014,000 33,000 270,000Cable TV Total
Engineering
40199006 12,862,71410,362,714 2,500,000SWLRT- Park and Ride Ramp at Beltline Station 1
40204001 161,000161,000Storm Water - Hannon Lake subwatershed 3
40211000 7,391,3877,391,387Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8) 1
40220003 287,500287,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 1
40221500 721,000721,000Alley Construction 3
40223000 540,000540,000Sanitary Sewer- Lining 1
40224001 236,900236,900Storm Water- Lamplighter Pond Rehab 1
40224300 55,00055,000Storm Water- BMP maintenance 1
40224500 50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 3
40226000 6,658,6256,658,625Street- W 36th Street/ Wooddale Rehab 1
40230003 287,500287,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 1
40231000 7,158,1367,158,136Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)1
40231050 1,529,2811,529,281Street - Commercial Street Rehab 1
40231100 8,622,5708,622,570Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR TH169 to Nevada)1
40231200 494,400494,400Street - Maintenance Project (Area 6)1
40231500 734,000734,000Alley Construction 3
40232000 326,150326,150CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 5
40233000 560,000560,000Sanitary Sewer- Lining 1
40234000 1,828,500159,000 1,669,500Storm Water- Webster Park WQ Improvements 3
40234200 20,00020,000Storm Water - Carpenter Park Maintenance 1
40234300 58,00058,000Storm Water- BMP maintenance 1
40234500 50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 3
40237000 4,010,000250,000 250,000 1,220,000 2,290,000County - Mtka Blvd (Hwy 100 to France)1
40240003 287,500287,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 1
40241000 7,428,9457,428,945Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)1
40241050 1,789,7841,789,784Street - Commercial Street Rehab 1
40241100 9,587,6409,587,640Street - MSA Street Rehab (Lou and CLR)1
40241200 412,000412,000Street - Maintenance Project (Area 8)1
40241500 660,000660,000Alley Construction 3
Wednesday, October 6, 2021Page 22021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Page 12 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1)
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026DepartmentProject # Priority
40241600 70,62070,620Parking Lot - MSC 3
40243000 580,000580,000Sanitary Sewer- Lining 1
40244000 438,725438,725Storm Water- Louisiana Oaks & South Oak Pond Rehab 1
40244001 94,01394,013Storm Water- Park Glen Improvements 1
40244002 87,74587,745Storm Water- Twin Lake outfall replacement 1
40244300 59,50059,500Storm Water- BMP maintenance 1
40244500 52,00052,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 3
40250003 287,500287,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 1
40251000 7,252,5007,252,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)1
40251050 1,268,4501,268,450Street - Commercial Street Rehab 1
40251200 576,800576,800Street - Maintenance Project (Area 1)1
40251500 464,000464,000Alley Construction 3
40251601 17,85017,850Parking Lot - Fire Stn #1 3
40251602 12,60012,600Parking Lot - Fire Stn #2 3
40253000 600,000600,000Sanitary Sewer- Lining 1
40253100 675,000675,000Sanitary sewer - Glenhurst LS #19 1
40254300 61,00061,000Storm Water- BMP maintenance 1
40254500 52,00052,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 3
40260003 287,500287,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-CB 1
40261000 5,307,5475,307,547Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)1
40261050 2,873,0682,873,068Street - Commercial Street Rehab 1
40261200 473,800473,800Street - Maintenance Project (Area 7)1
40261500 466,000466,000Alley Construction 3
40262000 630,200630,200CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 5
40263000 620,000620,000Sanitary Sewer- Lining 1
40264000 1,983,7501,983,750Storm Water- Ainsworth Park WQ Improvements 3
40264200 20,00020,000Storm Water - Carpenter Park Maintenance 1
40264300 62,50062,500Storm Water- BMP maintenance 1
40264500 52,00052,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 3
100,235,20026,873,126 24,259,537 22,768,472 13,557,700 12,776,365Engineering Total
Fire
65990001 16,0008,000 8,000Thermal Imagers 1
65990003 337,642337,642SCBA1
65990005 18,00018,000Auto-CPR Device 1
65990006 100,0000100,000Turnouts1
65990008 12,5006,000 6,500Air Monitors 3
65990009 39,00039,000AED's 1
65990010 24,00012,000 12,000Body Armor 3
65990011 15,0007,200 7,800RAD 57 5
65990012 12,00012,000Training Equipment Cache 3
65990013 6,00006,000Firefighting Barrier Hoods 1
65990014 16,0006,000 10,000Ice/Water Rescue Cache 3
65990016 25,00025,000Technical Rescue Cache n/a
65990017 17,0008,000 9,000Hose/Nozzle 1
65990019 8,0008,000Ventilation Fans 3
65990020 21,50021,500EMS - MED Kits 3
667,64213,200 389,642 60,800 84,000 120,000Fire Total
Operations & Recreation
21201801 345,000345,000Dakota Park LED Baseball Field Light Replacement 3
21216101 490,000490,000Webster Park Construction n/a
21221806 172,500172,500Dakota Bridge 1
21221815 75,00075,000Trail Reconstruction - Dakota Park 1
21224109 50,00050,000Trail Reconstruction - Minnehaha Creek 3
Wednesday, October 6, 2021Page 32021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Page 13 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1)
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026DepartmentProject # Priority
21230301 500,000500,000Court Reconstruction - Aquila Park Tennis (w/BSM) n/a
21231001 35,00035,000Court Reconstruction - Browndale Park n/a
21234611 30,00030,000Trail Reconstruction - Otten Pond 3
21234801 8,0008,000Court Resurface - Pennsylvania Park Basketball 3
21235112 10,00010,000Trail Reconstruction - Roxbury Park 3
21235813 10,00010,000Court Reconstruction - Twin Lakes Park Basketball 3
21240317 75,00075,000Trail Reconstruction - Aquila Park 3
21241118 50,00050,000Trail Reconstruction - Carpenter Park 3
21242719 30,00030,000Trail Reconstruction - Jersey Park 1
21244001 6,0006,000Court Resurface - Minikahda Vista Park Basketball 3
21246202 30,00030,000Trail Reconstruction - Westwood Hills NC, wldflr/t 3
21252101 5,0005,000Court Resurface - Fern Hill Park Tennis 3
21256403 100,000100,000Wolfe Park Amphitheater Pavers 3
212593202 51,50051,50040th & France Fencing & Parking Lot 3
21259903 100,000100,000Trail Reconstruction 3
21259905 150,000150,000Park Shelter Replacement - various parks 3
21259906 100,000100,000Trail Lighting 3
21260601 6,0006,000Court Resurface - Birchwood Basketball 3
21269901 100,000100,000Park Parking Lot Resurface 3
21269903 130,000130,000Trail (new), Hampshire Park to Otten Pond n/a
21990101 75,00075,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Ainsworth Park + concrete 1
21990301 100,000100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Aquila Park 1
21990902 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Bronx Park 1
21991002 80,00080,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Browndale Park 1
21991102 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Carpenter Park 1
21991503 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Cedarhurst Park 1
21991712 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Parkview Park 1
21992611 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Jackley Park 1
21993217 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Knollwood Green 1
21994502 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Oregon Park 1
21995403 70,00070,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Sunset Park 1
21996112 65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Webster Park 1
21996402 100,000100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Wolfe Park EVOS/Rock Climb 1
21999902 150,00030,000 30,000 30,000 30,000 30,000Playground Woodchips 1
22999901 390,00075,000 75,000 80,000 80,000 80,000Tree Replacement (80% blvd + 20% parks)3
22999903 125,00025,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000Buckthorn Management 3
23206201 40,00040,000Westwood Hills NC Rotary Deck Rebuild 1
23226201 48,00048,000Westwood Hills NC Garage (new)1
23226210 25,00025,000Westwood Hills NC Water Garden Repair/Trl mtce 5
23246202 15,00015,000Westwood Hills NC Staircase Railing 1
23246220 50,00050,000Westwood Hills NC Boardwalk Deck Repl, Ph 3 1
23256203 100,000100,000Westwood Hills NC Boardwalk Deck Repl, Ph 1,Wside 3
23256204 50,00050,000Westwood Hills NC Waterfall liner repair 5
24215005 215,000215,000Rec Center Parking Lot Replacement 1
24225004 70,00070,000Rec Center Parking Lot Light Replacement w/poles 1
24225006 40,00040,000Rec Center East Arena Painting 1
24225007 290,000290,000Rec Center Arena Rubber Floor 1
24225008 200,000200,000Rec Center Signage (2 entrance signs)3
24225010 25,00025,000Rec Center Elevator Updates 1
24225011 30,00030,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Sun Shelter Addition 1
24235008 75,00075,000Rec Center Arenas,Water Trtmnt Repl (to make ice)1
24235009 75,00075,000Rec Center West Arena Painting 1
24255003 25,00025,000Rec Center Banquet Room Carpet Replacement 3
24255010 800,000100,000 700,000Rec Center West Arena Roof Replacement 1
24265003 300,000300,000Rec Center West Arena Locker Room Remodel 3
24265004 1,000,0001,000,000Rec Center Boiler Replacement 1
24995003 150,000150,000Rec Center/ROC Dasher Board Replacement 1
Wednesday, October 6, 2021Page 42021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Page 14 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1)
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026DepartmentProject # Priority
24995006 30,00015,000 15,000Rec Center Arena Refrigeration Maintenance 1
24995008 125,00050,000 75,000Rec Center Dasher Board Repair 3
24995017 95,00020,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Rec Center Landscaping (woodchips)3
25210203 10,00010,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Feasibility Study 3
25220205 70,00070,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Locker Room Remodel 3
25235003 100,000100,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Sand/Play/Gazebo 1
25240201 250,000250,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Pool Gutters 1
25240202 250,000250,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Pool Heaters 1
25240203 100,000100,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Slide Recoating 1
25990212 25,00010,000 15,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Deck Furniture 1
25990215 12,5005,000 7,500Rec Center Aquatic Park Concession Eqpt. Rplcmt 3
27226601 50,00050,000ROC Storage 1
27236604 160,000160,000ROC Turf Replacement (w/turf tiles)1
27246603 20,00010,000 10,000ROC Roof Assessment 1
50224101 185,000185,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2022)1
50224111 360,000360,000Street Light Replacement, SSD1b 1
50224201 150,000150,000Replace Bus Shelters, SSDs 1-4 1
50224402 55,00055,000Edge Mill & Overlay: Wooddale (In-House)1
50234101 190,000190,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2023)1
50244101 195,000195,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2024)1
50244110 320,000320,000Street Light Replacement, SSD2a 1
50254101 200,000200,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2025)1
50254110 280,000280,000Street Light Replacement, SSD2b 1
50264101 205,000205,000Street Light Annual Replacement (2026)3
50264102 750,000750,000Replace Street Light Bases/Wiring; Shelard Park 3
50264110 250,000250,000Street Light Replacement, SSD3a 1
53225001 80,00080,000Water Well Rehab (SLP11)3
53235001 45,00045,000Water Well Rehab (SLP10)3
53235002 140,000140,000WTP8 Roof Replacement 1
53235003 70,00070,000GAC Replacement (WTP1)1
53245001 55,00055,000Water Well Rehab (SLP16)3
53245002 520,000520,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab, WTP1 1
53245003 50,00050,000Water Well Rehab (SLP8)3
53255001 85,00085,000Water Well Rehab (SLP12)3
53255003 74,00074,000GAC Replacement (WTP1)1
53255004 460,000460,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab, WTP6 1
53265002 55,00055,000Water Well Rehab (SLP4)3
53265003 45,00045,000Water Well Rehab (SLP15)3
53265004 400,000400,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab, WTP8 1
E - XX01 10,142,5571,937,605 2,340,559 1,800,941 1,714,914 2,348,538Annual Equipment Replacement Program 1
24,586,0574,488,105 4,603,559 4,231,941 4,072,914 7,189,538Operations & Recreation Total
Police
13995069 150,000150,000911 Server Replacement 1
20180001 10,00010,000SWAT Rifle replacement 1
20180002 24,00024,000SWAT Robot 3
20180003 7,0007,000SWAT Ballistic Shields 1
20210001 54,00054,000Dispatch Consollettes 1
60990001 41,00011,500 29,500Laser/Radar and Message Board 3
286,00011,500 186,500 34,000 54,000Police Total
Technology
13125001 25,00025,000IR: PCI Re-Assessment / Training / Security 1
13135001 500,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000IR: Hosted / Managed Services / DR / BC 1
13135004 20,00020,000OR: AVL / GPS 3
Wednesday, October 6, 2021Page 52021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Page 15 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1)
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026DepartmentProject # Priority
13145010 400,000400,000Police: New CAD/RMS/Mobile Suite 3
13155006 200,00040,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000Admin Serv:Document Mgmt System Maintenance 1
13155007 110,00022,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000IR: MyStLouisPark CRM 3
13155008 150,000150,000IR: City Hall Council Chambers AV Upgrade 3
13155016 26,00026,000Eng: Survey GPS 1
13155020 50,00010,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Police: Zuercher Crime View Dashboard 3
13165007 28,00016,000 4,000 4,000 4,000Admin Serv: HR Time Management System 3
13165009 110,00022,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000B&E / Fire / CD: Project Dox 1
13175004 18,00018,000Eng: Trimble R2 GPS Receiver 1
13175006 30,00030,000IR: Wireless Controller Replacement / Expansion 1
13185001 300,000300,000Admin Serv: ERP-Financial/HR/Payroll App (with UB)3
13185002 55,00011,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000Fire: Zuercher Field Ops Mobile Solution 3
13185003 15,00015,000Fire: Station Cameras / EOC in 2025 3
13185009 20,00020,000IR: Network Equipment Battery (UPS) Backup 1
13195001 200,000200,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App (with ERP)3
13195073 36,00012,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000IR: Lidar (one-time) / ESRI GIS Hub 3
13215002 40,0008,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000Admin Serv: NeoGov E-Documents Verification 3
13215003 12,00012,000OR: Trimble R2 GPS Receivers (2)1
13225019 10,00010,000OR: Nature Center Surveillance Cameras,Parking Lot 3
13995001 1,625,000325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000IR: On-going Software Licenses, Mtce, Development 1
13995002 625,000125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000IR: On-going Network Adds & Replacement 1
13995003 815,000235,000 120,000 120,000 120,000 220,000IR: On-going Hardware Adds & Replacement 1
13995004 567,000287,000 100,000 180,000Police: 800 MHz Mobile Police Radios 1
13995006 365,000145,000 25,000 25,000 145,000 25,000Police: Squad Computers / Printers / Cell Service 1
13995007 80,00080,000Fire / Police: Dispatch Voice Recorders 1
13995011 253,00049,000 51,000 51,000 51,000 51,000OR: Asset Mgmt Software (CarteGraph)3
13995013 30,00015,000 15,000IR: EOC Computer / Phone Equipment Replacement 3
13995015 1,481,534278,225 279,182 293,141 307,798 323,188IR: Tablet / Smartphone Hardware and Services 1
13995017 125,00025,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000Admin Serv - Hubble Budgeting Annual Maintenance 1
13995021 25,00025,000Police: Jail Cameras (17)1
13995022 20,00020,000Police: Non-Jail Cameras 1
13995024 55,00055,000Police: Dispatch Camera Viewing Workstations 1
13995025 80,00050,000 30,000OR: Rec Center / ROC / Lot Camera Replacements 1
13995026 85,00017,000 17,000 17,000 17,000 17,000IR: Surveillance Camera and S2 Locks Maintenance 3
13995029 34,0006,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800IR: Central City Hall Plotter (Lease)1
13995031 25,00025,000OR: MSC Cameras 3
13995035 60,00060,000IR: Telephone Handset / Handless Upgrades 3
13995036 35,8005,700 13,000 5,700 5,700 5,700IR: Remote Building Large Scanner / Plotter 3
13995037 60,00060,000Fire: Stations A/V and EOC Presentation Equipment 3
13995040 6,5006,500Police: Interview Room Cameras 1
13995041 20,00010,000 10,000IR: Wireless Hotspot Additions / Replacements 3
13995042 183,40333,191 34,851 36,594 38,423 40,344Police: Zuercher CAD Module Annual Fees 1
13995043 120,000120,000Police: Roll Call / EOC AV Equipment Replacement 3
13995052 30,00030,000OR: Oak Hill Camera/Security/Wi-Fi Replacements 3
13995053 23,00011,000 12,000OR: Park Shelter (Smaller) Camera Replacements 3
13995054 5,0005,000OR: Wolfe Park / Amphitheatre / Pool Wi-Fi Replace 3
13995056 42,5008,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500Police: Field Ops Interface 1
13995057 35,00035,000IR: UHL Camera Servers Replacement - City Hall 1
13995058 75,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000IR: Adobe Software Products Licensing 1
13995060 30,00030,000OR: Birchwood Cameras / S2 Security 3
13995061 15,00015,000OR: Wolfe Park Pavilion S2 / Amphitheatre Cameras 3
13995064 65,00065,000OR: Rec Banquet Room & Gallery A/V System Replace.1
13995065 350,00070,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000IR: Fiber Locates / Field Data Collection 1
13995066 175,00033,000 34,000 35,000 36,000 37,000IR: Fiber Asset Management 1
13995067 625,000117,500 117,500 130,000 130,000 130,000Police: Body and Squad Dash Cameras/Video Storage 3
13995068 70,00014,000 14,000 14,000 14,000 14,000Admin Serv: Tungsten Elec Accounts Payable 3
13995070 70,00035,000 15,000 20,000OR: Rec POS Stations 3
Wednesday, October 6, 2021Page 62021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Page 16 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1)
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Total2022 2023 2024 2025 2026DepartmentProject # Priority
13995071 125,00025,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000IR: Fiber Network Modifications / Repairs 1
13995072 8,0008,000Police: East / North Side Camera Replacements 3
10,874,7371,914,916 2,287,833 2,084,235 2,158,221 2,429,532Technology Total
GRAND TOTAL 140,822,63634,019,847 32,460,071 30,321,448 21,161,835 22,859,435
Report criteria:
Active Projects
All Address data
All Categories
All Departments
All Contacts
All From Street data
All Priority Levels
All Projects
All Source Types
All Street Name data
Wednesday, October 6, 2021Page 72021-2030 Capital Improvement Plan
Page 17 Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 1)
Title: 2022 Capital Improvement Plan, utility rates, and proposed budget
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: October 11, 2021
Discussion item: 2
Executive summary
Title: Anti-idling research and recommendations
Recommended action: No action required. This topic has been placed on the agenda to begin a
conversation around anti-idling policy recommendations.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to take action to limit vehicle idling in St. Louis
Park? What policy tools would the council like to use to take action?
Summary: Idling refers to running a vehicle’s engine when the vehicle is not in motion. Idling
has numerous negative impacts, including air pollution, carbon emissions, and a heightened risk
of vehicle theft.
Staff has been working with the Environment and Sustainability Commission (ESC) to draft
options for reducing idling in St. Louis Park and has prepared a report detailing these options
for council consideration. These include regulation through ordinance, resolution statement,
internal fleet policy, and a public education campaign. Each option is described along with some
of the advantages and disadvantages of each.
The ESC and staff are recommending that council consider option 1 and/or 2.
Financial or budget considerations: None at this time.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in
environmental stewardship.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Prepared by: Emily Ziring, sustainability manager
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, director of building and energy
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 2) Page 2
Title: Anti-idling research and recommendations
Discussion
Background: Idling refers to running a vehicle’s engine when the vehicle is not in motion (for
the purposes of this report, a “vehicle” is one with an internal combustion engine that burns
gasoline, gasoline-ethanol, diesel, biodiesel, natural gas or propane; while battery electric
vehicles will drain their batteries while idling, they have no tailpipe emissions and therefore
may be a lesser concern). Idling can be both discretionary (providing heat and air conditioning
for the driver, talking on a cell phone in a parking lot, waiting to pick up a passenger, sitting in a
drive-thru line or while waiting for a curbside order) and non-discretionary (stopped in heavy
traffic or waiting for a traffic signal, powering on-board devices and equipment, inspection and
maintenance, emergency and public safety). Misinformation likely contributes significantly to
idling as well, with many drivers believing that the things they learned about cars from past
generations, like engines needing to warm up in the winter (no longer true since electronic
injection systems replaced carburetors), still apply to modern vehicles.
Idling has numerous negative impacts:
•Adverse effects on public health: Idling can produce more tailpipe emissions per minute
than driving. Studies have linked various types of vehicle emissions to asthma
symptoms, cardiopulmonary disease, lung cancer and other causes of death. Children
are even more vulnerable to air pollution than adults because they breathe much more
air per pound of body weight and their respiratory defenses are not fully developed
(source: Mid-America Regional Council), which makes idling outside schools—one of the
most common idling scenarios as parents wait to pick up children—especially
dangerous. Vehicle exhaust has also been linked to brain cell damage. Drivers are likely
unaware that the catalytic converter, which reduces tailpipe emissions, reaches
operating temperatures much sooner when driving than when idling.
•Carbon emissions: Eliminating 16 minutes of discretionary idling per day would result in a
savings of 704 pounds of CO2 for a typical four-cylinder passenger vehicle (source:
Sustainable America). Assuming 40,000 passenger vehicles are registered in St. Louis
Park, this equates to 13,000 tons CO2 per year that could be eliminated, or the equivalent
CO2 of 1,500 homes’ energy use for one year. Most mid-size and larger SUVs and trucks
are equipped with six-cylinder engines, so the total amount of carbon emitted is likely
even greater. Transportation makes up 39% of total greenhouse gas emissions in St. Louis
Park and is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in Minnesota.
•Heightened risk of vehicle theft: In 2019, St. Louis Park experienced 93 auto thefts. Fifty-
four percent of those vehicles were idling or had the keys left in them. Auto thefts in
2020 rose to 165, with 47 percent of those found idling. Auto theft rises about 25% in
the winter due to vehicles being left unattended to warm up with the keys in the
ignition--“puffer” thieves look for the telltale white puffs that emanate from a car’s
exhaust on a cold day when searching for targets. Many people are unaware that driving
helps the engine reach its ideal operating temperature faster than idling it.
•Wasting money: Vehicles get 0 MPG while idling. A typical four-cylinder passenger
vehicle wastes 32 gallons of fuel annually through discretionary idling (source:
Sustainable America), at a cost of $75-100. Idling while waiting consumes more fuel and
is much less efficient than turning the engine off and on again, despite many people
believing the opposite.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 2) Page 3
Title: Anti-idling research and recommendations
• Vehicle wear-and-tear: Vehicle manufacturers advise that idling for longer than 30-60
seconds can actually be damaging to an engine. Idling can produce sulfuric acid, which
can eat away at a vehicle’s engine and other components. Additionally, idling results in
lower combustion temperatures, which can produce additional soot and creates buildup
in the engine (source: US Department of Energy).
• Noise: An idling vehicle contributes to noise pollution, which can affect hearing and
stress levels.
In February 2020, concerned residents and Councilmember Kraft attended an Environment and
Sustainability Commission meeting to ask the ESC about researching anti-idling tools and
presenting recommendations for ways to limit idling to council. The research was tabled for a
year due to COVID-19.
At the March 9, 2021 council study session, Councilmembers Kraft and Rog presented a study
session topic proposal on Vehicle Idling, which included a request for staff and the ESC to work
on the issue jointly. Staff presented on the topic at the April and May ESC meetings, and the
ESC expressed support for reducing idling in St. Louis Park through a few different means.
Present considerations: Public agencies across the country have employed a variety of tools in an
effort to limit vehicle idling. This report attempts to summarize options that the city council may
choose to pursue individually or in combination, noting the options that the ESC has endorsed.
Option 1: Anti-idling policy for city fleet vehicles
This option is endorsed by the ESC.
Description: Create a standalone anti-idling policy for city staff who use fleet vehicles to include
more specific rules around idling of gas and diesel-fueled vehicles than the language in the City
Vehicle Usage policy (written in 2013) (“Vehicles must be off when the vehicle is unattended.
Exceptions are vehicles that require the strobe/hazard lights to be on or the use of inverters.”).
Examples: Unknown, but likely that many public agencies have internal policies (could base
specifics off the Minneapolis ordinance)
Advantages:
• Limiting idling is good for air quality and carbon reduction
• Improves respiratory health of city staff and customers
• Fuel and money savings for city operations
• Opportunity to educate fleet users about idling
• Can place reminder decals inside vehicles
• Can motivate compliance with rewards for fuel efficiency improvements
• Leading by example
Disadvantages:
• Unclear how prevalent this is given high compliance with existing policy—may require a
lot of effort for little additional benefit
• Vehicles are shared, meaning that specific employees are not tied to specific vehicles
and any fuel efficiency data would have to be analyzed at a fleet-wide level
• Public safety vehicles, emergency vehicles, and many public works, parks and city
maintenance vehicles must be idled to maintain power to on-board devices and
equipment, meaning policy would only apply to handful of fleet vehicles
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 2) Page 4
Title: Anti-idling research and recommendations
Option 2: Educational campaign
This option is endorsed by the ESC.
Description: Use city communications tools (including, potentially, signage) to spread message
throughout the city that idling is detrimental to public health and the environment.
Examples: Common at schools, but no examples found from cities (beyond those that have
ordinances in place, such as New York City)
Advantages:
• Limiting idling is good for air quality and carbon reduction
• Improves respiratory health of drivers and passengers
• Fuel and money savings for vehicle owners
• Collateral materials already exist that could be leveraged
• Campaign could both encourage individual participation in reducing greenhouse gas
emissions and increase participation in other sustainability activities
• Opportunity for events such as film screenings (“Idle Threat” documentary)
• Could create targeted list of common discretionary idling locations and partner with
those businesses, school district/Roots & Shoots and private schools to encourage
participation in campaign
• Could partner with local fleet owners to assist in spreading the message
Disadvantages:
• Difficult to educate vehicle owners who are not based in St. Louis Park
• Not enforceable
Option 3a: Anti-idling ordinance city-wide for all on-road gas and diesel-fueled vehicles
Description: Restrict through regulation the number of minutes that passenger vehicles and
heavy-duty trucks and buses are able to idle, with possible exceptions for public safety and
emergency response vehicles; public works, parks and city maintenance vehicles; refrigerated
delivery trucks; vehicle breakdowns; extreme temperatures; etc.
Examples: Minneapolis, Saint Paul (remote starters exempt), Owatonna, St. Cloud (limited in
geographic scope), Fargo
Advantages:
• Could reduce vehicle theft in scenarios where cars are left idling with keys/fobs in
ignition
• Limiting idling is good for air quality and carbon reduction
• Fuel and money savings for vehicle owners
• Opportunity to educate vehicle owners about idling
• Leading by example
Disadvantages:
• Enforcement would be difficult and limited (Minneapolis’s ordinance is administered by
their Health Department and it is unclear how many citations are written; Fargo’s
ordinance is not enforced, per deputy police chief); calls would require immediate
response
• If enforcement is inconsistent, could frustrate residents and hurt sustainability message
• Could have unintended consequences, e.g. being used by neighbors to harass one
another or report visitors they find suspicious (at a recent Sierra Club presentation, a
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 2) Page 5
Title: Anti-idling research and recommendations
local environmental justice trainer described a heated discussion at a Minneapolis
Southside Green Zone meeting in which some community members said anti-idling
policies felt like “vehicular stop-and-frisk”)
• Could frustrate vehicle owners who have paid to install remote starters to warm up
their vehicles, unless exempted—which could lead to confusion
Other considerations:
• Consider whether to prohibit all idling, or only idling when vehicle is unattended with
keys/fob in the ignition
• Consider whether to exempt vehicles on private property, including driveways and most
parking lots, and whether there would be unintended consequences of doing so (i.e.
vehicles moved from street to driveway to warm up)
• Consider how to address drive-thrus, where idling is frequent and largely unavoidable
• Consider whether to exempt electric vehicles and if so, which types (battery electric,
plug-in hybrid electric, or hybrid electric)
• Would working toward a coalition created to push for consistent anti-idling regulations
(or using an existing coalition to push for the same) throughout the metro be more
effective than policy enacted in a patchwork way?
Option 3b: Anti-idling ordinance city-wide for commercial vehicles
(i.e. heavy-duty trucks and buses) only
Description: Restrict through regulation number of minutes that heavy-duty commercial
vehicles are able to idle, with possible exceptions for non-road vehicles; public safety and
emergency response vehicles; public works, parks and city maintenance vehicles; refrigerated
delivery trucks; vehicle breakdowns; extreme temperatures; etc. Heavy-duty vehicles typically
burn diesel and emit significantly more particulate matter and carbon than passenger vehicles.
Examples: Minneapolis; idling of school buses state-wide must be “minimized” per Minnesota
statute
Advantages:
• Limiting idling is good for air quality and carbon reduction
• Fuel and money savings for truck and fleet owners
• Opportunity to educate vehicle owners about idling
• Leading by example
Disadvantages:
• Enforcement would be difficult and limited (Minneapolis’s ordinance is administered by
their Health Department and it is unclear how many citations are written); calls would
require immediate response
• Could be confusing for drivers to understand what applies to them
• Difficult to communicate to truck drivers and fleet owners based outside St. Louis Park
Other considerations:
• Unclear how prevalent this is (the city Fleet Manager noted that most if not all major
freight and parcel companies delivering to the Municipal Service Center turn off trucks
on arrival)
• Consider whether to exempt vehicles on private property, including most parking lots
and loading docks
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 2) Page 6
Title: Anti-idling research and recommendations
Option 4: Anti-idling resolution statement
Description: Adopt a resolution affirming support for clean air and improved health through
encouraging limits on idling.
Examples: Houston, New Jersey
Advantages:
• Opportunity to educate vehicle owners about idling
• Leading by example
• Could pinpoint “idle-free zones” throughout the city for signage, targeting areas with
high levels of particulate matter or those where idling is common, such as curbside pick-
up spots (assuming private property owners cooperate)
Disadvantages:
• Not enforceable
• Could cause confusion for residents wanting to report perceived violations
• May be difficult to establish “idle-free zones” with nearby businesses and residents
Option 5: Anti-idling policy at city facilities
Description: Create policy to ban all vehicle idling (including fleet vehicles and privately-owned
vehicles) at all of the city’s major facilities and parks, with possible exceptions for public safety
and emergency response vehicles; public works, parks and city maintenance vehicles;
refrigerated delivery trucks; vehicle breakdowns; extreme temperatures; etc.
Examples: Unknown
Advantages:
• Limiting idling is good for air quality and carbon reduction
• Fuel and money savings for vehicle owners
• Opportunity to educate vehicle owners about idling
• Could create “idle-free zone” signage for city properties
Disadvantages:
• Unclear who could enforce or how
• Could be confusing for drivers to understand policy that only applies on city property
• Signage at all entrances and throughout parking lots needed for visitors
• Consider whether to exempt electric vehicles and if so, which types (battery electric,
plug-in hybrid electric, or hybrid electric)
Next steps: Staff will work internally and/or with the city attorney to draft the necessary policy,
campaign or code language to create the programs the council wishes to pursue (if any). This
language, along with any financial considerations, will be presented at a future council study
session for consideration.
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: October 11, 2021
Discussion item: 3
Executive summary
Title: Upcoming study session agenda
Recommended action: The city council and city manager to set the agenda for the special study
session scheduled for Oct. 18, 2021 and the regularly scheduled study session on Oct. 25, 2021.
Policy consideration: Not applicable.
Summary: This report summarizes the proposed agenda for the special study session scheduled
for Oct. 18, 2021 and the regularly scheduled study session on Oct. 25, 2021.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Tentative agenda – Oct. 18 and Oct. 25, 2021
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 3) Page 2
Title: Upcoming study session agenda
Oct. 18, 2021.
5:30 p.m. Special study session – community room
Tentative discussion items
1.Neighborhood and community sidewalk designation– Operations & recreation/engineering
(40 minutes)
Per council request, staff will discuss snow removal from community versus neighborhood
sidewalks.
Oct. 25, 2021.
6:30 p.m. Study session – community room
Tentative discussion items
1.Upcoming study session agenda – administrative services (5 minutes)
Communications/meeting check-in – administrative services (5 minutes)
Time for communications between staff and council will be set aside on every study session
agenda for the purposes of information sharing.
Written reports
2.September monthly financial report
3.Beltline Station Development update
4.Sustainability Division update for Q4 2021
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: October 11, 2021
Written report: 4
Executive summary
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy
Recommended action: Does the EDA wish to update and revise its TIF Policy as proposed?
Policy consideration: Does the EDA approve the proposed updates and revisions as reflected in
the amended and restated TIF Policy?
Summary: The EDA’s Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Policy was adopted Aug. 18, 1997 and
subsequently modified to reflect the city’s Green Building and Inclusionary Housing policies.
During the Jan. 11, 2021 study session pertaining to the annual TIF district management report,
it was suggested that the TIF Policy be revisited to see where it may be in need of updating and
revision. Staff reviewed the TIF Policy and has made numerous proposed updates, revisions and
clarifications which reflect the city’s current Strategic Priorities, adopted policies, as well as
current TIF application practices and procedures.
Attached is a redline of the proposed amended and restated TIF Policy. Notable updates include:
•Updated, enhanced, and expanded objectives for the use of TIF to reflect the city council’s
strategic priorities and goals.
•Proposed developments must meet the requirements of the city’s Green Building Policy,
Inclusionary Housing Policy, and pending Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Policy. The
Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Policy will be discussed at a separate council study session.
•Requests for TIF assistance should not exceed 10% of a project’s Total Development Cost
and should not exceed 15 years’ worth of tax increment generated by the project unless
there are mitigating circumstances.
•TIF will be provided primarily on a “pay-as-you-go” basis” for a stated number of years, up
to a predetermined maximum amount.
•The former “Report Card” in the TIF Policy has been replaced with a TIF Policy Compliance
Table similar to the compliance tables provided in the planning application staff reports.
The proposed amended and restated TIF Policy has been reviewed by the EDA’s financial consultant
and legal counsel who recommend approval. The proposed revisions may be discussed at the Nov.
22 study session relative to the EDA’s management and use of TIF. If the proposed amended and
restated TIF Policy is acceptable, it will be scheduled for subsequent EDA consideration and adoption.
Financial or budget considerations: City staff time to implement, manage and monitor compliance
of the TIF Policy as the number of developments subject to the policy continues to increase.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing
and neighborhood oriented development. St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial
equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: Red-lined amended and restated TIF Policy; How TIF Works: Basic Mechanics
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, economic development manager
Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director, EDA executive director
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Tax Increment Financing (TIF)
Policy
Adopted August 18, 1997
Amended and Restated 2021
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 2
1
City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority
Tax Increment Financing Policy
For the purpose of this policy, the "city" shall primarily mean the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority (EDA), which serves in conducting various economic development,
housing and redevelopment programs and activities within the City of St. Louis Park.
I.General policy
The purpose of this policy is to establish the city's position relating to the use of Tax Increment
Financing (TIF) for private development. This policy shall be used as a guide in processing and
reviewing applications requesting tax increment assistance. The fundamental purpose of tax
increment financing in St. Louis Park is to encourage desirable development and/or
redevelopment that would not otherwise occur “but for” the assistance provided through TIF.
The City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority shall consider TIF for projects
developments that serve to accomplish the city’s goals for economic development and housing
as they may change over time. The goals include facilitating projects developments that would
result in the attraction, retention, and/or expansion of businesses, creation or retention of
quality jobs (e.g., stable employment and/or attractive wages and benefits), remediation of
contaminated properties, or development and renovation of market rate and affordable
housing options in the city.
At the time of any application for a Comprehensive Plan amendment, rezoning or site plan
approval for a project, whichever occurs first, applicants must disclose that TIF will be
requested.
II.City EDA’s objectives for the use of TIF
As a matter of adopted policy, the City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority will
consider using TIF to assist private development projects proposed developments to achieve
over half of the following purposes, as applicable:
•Foster racial equity, diversity, and inclusion economically and in the community.
•Encourage development incorporating green building components and processes that help
achieve the city’s Climate Action Plan goals.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 3
2
•Remove blight, contamination, and/or encourage redevelopment in the commercial and
industrial areas of the city in order to encourage high quality development and
revitalization.
•Enhance the overall livability and economic vitality of the community.
•Retain and expand the city’s businesses as well as attract new, complementary investment
and employment.
•Retain local jobs and/or increase the number and diversity of quality jobs (e.g., stable
employment and/or living wages and benefits).
•Provide public amenities, improvements and/or placemaking features which benefit a larger
area than the subject development site.
•Encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the area, either directly or as a
catalyst for secondary "spin-off" development.
•Achieve any of the following housing-related goals:
•to promote high quality housing for households with a variety of income levels, ages,
and sizes in order to meet the city's goal of preserving and promoting economically
diverse housing options in the community.
•to provide a balanced, broad range and sustainable housing stock of both market
rate and affordable housing stock to meet diverse needs maintain a diverse
population and to provide housing for those who live or work in the city.
•to promote neighborhood stabilization and revitalization by the removal of blight
and the upgrading of existing housing stock.
•to ensure all housing is safe and well maintained.
•Offset increased costs of redevelopment (e.g., contaminated site clean-up, soil correction,
lead and asbestos abatement, demolition), over and above the costs that a developer would
incur in normally incurred in urban and suburban development.
•Facilitate the development process and to achieve development on sites which would not
be developed without this assistance.
•Meet other uses of public policy, as adopted by the council from time to time, including
promotion of quality human-scaled urban design, quality architecture, environmental
stewardship, energy conservation, decreasing the capital and operating costs of local
government, etc.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 4
3
•Encourage the application of Livable Communities, New Urbanism, Transit Oriented
Development, and sustainable design principles to a development project so as to create
compact, efficient mixed-use development, quality amenities (e.g., public art), and
attractive, pedestrian and transit friendly development.
III.Costs that qualify for tax increment financing assistance
The EDA will primarily consider the following development costs eligible for reimbursement
through tax increment financing, as permitted under State Statutes:
•Land acquisition
•Demolition
•Project design fees including: utilities, landscape, architectural and engineering.
•Site work including permits for site work, earthwork/excavation, soil correction, shoring,
additional structural support systems such as pilings, and related architectural and
engineering fees
•Design and construction of utilities, stormwater systems, streets and roads,
street/parking lot paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks, lighting, and landscaping
•Special assessments
•Legal fees (acquisition, finance, closing)
•Soil tests
•Environmental studies and remediation
•Surveys
•Park and open space dedication fees
•Interest rate write downs
•Replacement or clean-up of contaminated soils which would otherwise preclude
redevelopment
•Parking structures
•Construction of affordable housing
•Rehabilitation of commercial and industrial buildings and multi-family housing facilities
•Relocation assistance
•Any Other costs allowable by Statute
IV.Projects that may qualify for tax increment financing assistance
All new TIF projects proposed developments considered by the City of St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority must meet each of the following minimum qualifications and will also
be evaluated based on their ability to meet the desired qualifications for assistance. However, it
should not be presumed that a project development meeting any of the qualifications will
automatically be approved. Meeting the qualifications creates no contractual rights on the part
of any potential developer to have its project approved.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 5
4
Minimum qualifications
The project development should meet one or more than half of the Tax Increment Financing
Objectives outlined in Section 2, but at a minimum shall:
A.The project must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
Ordinances or required changes to the plan and ordinances must be under active
consideration by the City at the time of final TIF application submittal.
Be consistent with the city's Strategic Priorities, Comprehensive Plan, Zoning, and other
ordinances effective at the time of final TIF application submittal. The project shall also
be consistent with any changes to the plan and ordinances under active consideration
by the City at the time of final TIF application submittal and adopted during the period
of negotiation of TIF assistance.
B.Meet requirements of the city’s Green Building, Inclusionary Housing, and Diversity,
Equity, and Inclusion Policies (as applicable).
C. Remove contamination, blight, poor soils, and/or encourage redevelopment in the
commercial and industrial areas of the city in order to encourage high quality
development or redevelopment and private reinvestment in those areas.
D.To fFacilitate the development process and to achieve desired development on sites
which would not be developed without this assistance.
E.Demonstrate to the satisfaction of the EDA’s financial and legal consultants that the
project development is not financially feasible "but-for" the use of tax increment
financing.
F.Prior to approval of a TIF financing plan, the developer shall provide any requested
market and financial feasibility studies, appraisals, soil boring, private lender
commitment, and/or other information the City or its financial consultants may require
in order to proceed with an independent underwriting of the proposal.
G.The developer must provide adequate financial guarantees to ensure the repayment of
the TIF loan and completion of the project development. These may include, but are
not limited to: assessment agreements, letters of credit, personal deficiency guarantees,
guaranteed maximum cost contract, etc.
H.Any developer requesting TIF assistance should be able to demonstrate past successful
general development capability as well as specific capability in the type and size of
development proposed. TIF will not be used when the developer's credentials, in the
sole judgment of the city, are inadequate due to past track record relating to
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 6
5
completion of projects, general reputation and/or bankruptcy, or other problems or
issues considered relevant by the city.
I.The developer should retain ownership of the project development at least long enough
to complete it, to stabilize its occupancy, to establish the project development
management, and to initiate repayment of the TIF loan.
Desired qualifications
A.TIF proposals Developments creating a higher ratio of property taxes paid before and
after redevelopment will receive priority consideration. Given the different assessment
circumstances in the city, this ratio will vary widely. A 1:2 ratio of property taxes paid
before and after redevelopment is desired.
B.TIF proposals should normally not be used to support speculative industrial, commercial,
or office development; however, any such speculative developments will be considered
on a case-by-case basis. In general, the developer should be able to provide market
data, tenant letters of commitment or finance statements which support the market
potential/demand for the proposed project.
C.Requests for TIF assistance should not exceed 10% of a project’s Total Development
Cost and should not exceed 15 years’ worth of tax increment generated by the project
unless there are mitigating circumstances in accordance with this policy which require
these parameters to be exceeded.
D.The proposed amount of TIF assistance or term of the TIF Note should be within range
of similar developments which previously received TIF assistance.
E.TIF will normally not be used in provided to a project development that involves an
excessive land and/or property price i.e., where the acquisition price exceeds the
property’s market value by more than 20% as determined by an independent appraisal
of the property.
F.TIF will not be used in project provided to developments that would give a significant
competitive financial advantage over similar projects in the area due to the use of tax
increment subsidies. Developers should provide information to support that TIF
assistance will not create such a competitive advantage. Priority consideration will be
given to projects that fill an unmet market need.
A.TIF will be provided on a pay-as-you-go-basis. Any request for upfront assistance will
be evaluated on its own merit in accordance with the City's general financing policies.
Projects requesting pay-as-you-go financing will receive priority consideration. See
Section V below
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 7
6
G.TIF will normally not be used considered for project developments that would generate
significant environmental problems in the opinion of the local, state, or federal
governments. Priority will be given to project developments that aim to clean-up
existing contaminated sites and would facilitate the location of business or industry that
has an environmentally sound track-record.
H.Preference will be given to project developments that meet good public policy criteria
as determined by the EDA and city council, including:
•High project quality (e.g., sound architectural design, quality construction and
materials).
•Projects that complement and provide significant improvement to surrounding land
uses, the neighborhood, and/or the city.
•Projects that provide a significant increase in tax base.
•Projects that provide new, or retained, employment (if applicable).
•Projects that exceed the city’s Inclusionary Housing policy, if applicable.
•Projects that further diversity, equity, and inclusion economically and in the
community.
•Projects that meet financial feasibility criteria established by the city.
•Projects that provide optimal the highest and best desired use for the property.
•Projects consistent with Livable Communities, New Urbanism, transit-oriented
development, and sustainable design principles.
•Projects that complement and/or add value to neighborhood by providing public
elements (if applicable).
•Projects that stimulate further investment in surrounding neighborhood.
•Projects that will generally have a positive community impact.
I.TIF will not be used to support project developments that are likely to place
extraordinary demands on city services.
V.Form of assistance
Tax increment financing will generally be provided on a “pay-as-you-go” basis wherein
the EDA reimburses the applicant for eligible project costs for a stated number of years,
up to a predetermined maximum amount. The EDA will have the option to issue a TIF
Note with or without interest, where the principal amount of the TIF Note is equal to
the amount of eligible project costs incurred and proven by the developer. In all cases,
semi-annual TIF payments will be based on available increment generated from the
project. TIF payments will be made after collection of property taxes.
Any request for upfront assistance will be evaluated on its own merit in accordance with
the city's general financing policies. Projects Developments requesting pay-as-you-go
financing will receive priority consideration.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 8
7
VI. TAX INCREMENT PROJECT EVALUATION PROCESS Evaluation process for all tax
increment financing applications
The following five methods of analysis for all TIF proposals will be used:
1. Consideration of project meeting minimum qualifications.
2. Consideration of project meeting desired qualifications.
3. Project meets "but-for" analysis and statutory qualifications (Exhibit A).
4. Project Report Card (Exhibit B)
5. Project is deemed consistent with Vision St. Louis Park and City Strategic Plan
The following four methods of analysis, as reflected in the TIF Policy Compliance Table attached
as Exhibit B, will be used for all TIF applications:
1. Is the development consistent with the city’s Strategic Priorities, plans, ordinances, and
policies?
2. Does the development meet or exceed minimum qualifications?
3. Does the development meet or exceed desired qualifications?
4. Does the development meet statutory qualifications and "but-for" analysis?
Please note that the evaluation methodology is intended to provide a balanced review. Each
area will be evaluated individually and collectively and in no case shall one area outweigh
another in terms of importance to determining the level of TIF assistance.
VII. Application for TIF assistance for all TIF districts AND PROJECT AREAS
The tax increment financing program will be administered by the St. Louis Park EDA. The St.
Louis Park EDA will require a non-refundable application fee in the amount of $3,000 for its
processing of the application. The amount of the application fee will be determined from time
to time by the EDA or city council. The application fee shall be paid to the EDA at the time a
final TIF application is submitted.
At the time a final TIF application is submitted, the applicant shall also make an initial deposit
$20,000 with the EDA (depending on project size and complexity) to cover its attorney’s legal,
financial, and other necessary consultant costs incurred as part of establishing or amending a
TIF district, drafting and negotiating a development agreement, and conducting any fiscal
analysis that may be required to meet the requirements of utilizing TIF. If additional expenses
are incurred beyond the initial deposit $20,000, prior to the execution of a during the term of
the redevelopment agreement, the EDA shall notify the applicant in writing and the applicant
will be required to deposit additional funds upon notice.
If the project development is approved and the applicant proceeds with the project it’s
construction, the EDA shall reimburse the applicant any unused portion of the deposit as of the
date of execution of the development agreement after issuance of the TIF Note. If the applicant
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 9
8
does not proceed with the project development, the EDA shall reimburse the applicant for the
unused portion of the deposit as of the date that the EDA is notified in writing that the
applicant desires to withdraw its application.
VIII. Application process and procedures
The application process is a two-step process and must be completed in accordance with the
TIF application procedures outlined in Exhibit A. The purpose of this approach is to give an
applicant the opportunity to present a development proposal without expending a great deal of
money and time in pursuing a development that may conflict with the city's goals and
objectives.
IX. Other policy issues
Fiscal disparities
It is the CityEDA’s general policy to have tax increment financing districts contribute to fiscal
disparities in accordance with applicable State law. Tax revenues for fiscal disparities generated
by the project will be the responsibility of properties inside the TIF district. In the event a
project development cannot be completed as a result of this election, the city may re-evaluate
the impact of this policy on the project within the framework of State statutes.
Loss of government aid
At any time, if the formation of a new TIF district or the use of an existing district to finance a
project will subject the city to an LGA/HACA penalty or local contribution to a project, the
transaction shall be structured so as to have the ultimate cost to the city minimized to the
greatest extent permitted by law, so as to have the project bear the cost of the penalty or
contribution.
Public use of tax increment
The EDA and City shall follow applicable state laws in terms of potential public improvement
financing with TIF. It shall be the general policy of the EDA and City to identify public
improvements at the time of adoption or amendment of the TIF Plan.
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1997 by the
City of St. Louis Park/St. Louis Park EDA
_____________________________
Mayor
_____________________________
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 10
9
EDA President
ATTEST:
_________________________________
City Manager/EDA Executive Director
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 11
10
ADDENDUM
The TIF Policy shall be implemented and administered in accordance with the requirements set
forth in adopted EDA and city policies including the following:
•Green Building Policy adopted February 16, 2010, as updated September 16, 2014, and
July 14, 2020, and as subsequently amended.
•Inclusionary Housing Policy adopted June 1, 2015, as amended May 15, 2017,
September 6, 2018, September 2019, and July 2021 and as subsequently amended.
•Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Policy (adoption pending) as finally adopted and as
subsequently amended.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 12
11
Exhibit A
Application procedures for tax increment financing assistance
1. Applicant must meet with city economic development and planning staff to discuss the
scope of the project, consistency with city Strategic Priorities, etc., financial assistance
being requested, time schedule, city policy requirements and other information as may
be necessary before applying for tax increment assistance.
2. If the applicant plans to apply for tax increment assistance, the applicant must disclose
that TIF will be requested at the time of any application for a Comprehensive Plan
amendment, rezoning or site plan approval for a project, whichever occurs first.
3. Preliminary project plans requesting planning applications, and indication of need for
TIF assistance shall be submitted/presented in a staff report at a city council/EDA study
session for initial concept review and feedback. The applicant may make a formal
presentation of the project if necessary or requested. If the council/EDA’s preliminary
concept review is generally positive, and the EDA indicates that it is willing to consider a
formal request for tax increment assistance then the applicant may file a formal
application for TIF assistance. At the time of such application, the applicant is to submit
the required application fee and initial escrow deposit to be placed in a separate
account to cover the EDA’s financial and legal consulting fees associated with the
application.
4. The application shall be reviewed by city staff and the EDA’s financial consultant in a
timely manner. Once an appropriate amount of assistance is determined, staff shall
prepare a report with its findings of compliance with applicable city policies along with
its recommendation for TIF assistance.
5. The staff report shall be submitted/presented at a city council/EDA study session. If the
council/EDA wishes to proceed and formally consider providing assistance to the
proposed project, staff will be directed to undertake the following steps:
- schedule a public hearing for the establishment of the appropriate TIF district type.
- have a tax increment financing plan prepared.
- prepare business terms for the provision of the agreed upon amount of tax increment.
6. The proposed business terms shall be submitted/presented in a staff report at a city
council/EDA study session. If the terms are found to be generally acceptable and the
EDA wishes to formally consider them, staff shall be directed to incorporate the terms
into a redevelopment contract.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 13
12
7. If the proposed development requires the sale of EDA or city-owned property, the
planning commission will need to make a formal finding that the proposed property sale
is consistent with the city’s comprehensive plan.
8. A public hearing for the establishment of the proposed TIF district shall then be held in
conjunction with formal consideration of the proposed TIF district and redevelopment
contract.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 14
13
Exhibit B
TIF Policy Compliance Table*
Factor Requirement/Guideline Proposed Project Met?
Applicable TIF
District
Redevelopment/Renewal & Renovation/
Housing/Economic Development
Statutory TIF
district
requirements
Redevelopment District (example)
70% site coverage,
More than 50% of bldgs structurally
substandard & are reasonably distributed
Use of TIF Proposed costs are statutorily eligible for
reimbursement through proposed TIF district.
TIF Objectives TIF Policy requires projects to meet more than
half of objectives for use of TIF.
Minimum
qualifications
Applicable Strategic Priorities
Meets or exceeds Green Building Policy
requirements
Meets or exceeds Inclusionary Housing Policy
requirements (if applicable)
Meets or exceeds Diversity, Equity, and
Inclusion Policy
Consistent with city's Comprehensive Plan and
Zoning Ordinance, or approvals pending
Removes contamination, blight and/or will not
generate significant environmental problems
Helps facilitate desired development that
would not occur without assistance
Developer provided necessary documentation
to evaluate TIF need and proposed project
Determined not financially feasible "but-for"
the use of tax increment financing
Developer has experience and capability to
construct proposed project
Developer plans to retain ownership of project
long enough to stabilize occupancy (if
applicable)
Desired
qualifications
Incorporates Livable Communities, New
Urbanism, TOD, Sustainable Design principles
(i.e., mixed-use, urban design, human scale,
walkable, public spaces, and sustainable
design features).
High quality development (sound architectural
design, quality construction and materials)
Complements and/or adds value to
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 15
14
neighborhood by providing public elements or
placemaking features (if applicable)
Proposed development will likely stimulate
further investment in surrounding
area/neighborhood
Provides new, or retained, employment (if
applicable)
The increase in market value of the property
after redevelopment is more than 8 times the
original market value
Will have a positive community impact
Will not place extraordinary demands on city
services
Land price for project site is within market
range.
Ratio of private to city investment (TIF and
grants) is more than $5 to $1
The proposed amount of TIF assistance or
term of the TIF Note is within range of similar
developments which received TIF assistance.
Proposed TIF assistance will be provided on a
pay-as-you-go-basis.
*This table may be amended from time to time to reflect changes to city policy and to provide
additional clarity to applicants.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 4)
Title: Proposed amended and restated TIF Policy Page 16
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: October 11, 2021
Written report: 5
Executive summary
Title: COVID-19 local business assistance update
Recommended action: None. This report is for information purposes. Please contact staff with
any questions.
Policy consideration: None
Summary: In response to the significant challenges local businesses faced during COVID-19 over
the past year and a half, city staff worked on multiple fronts to assess local business needs and
assist businesses address and mitigate the impacts of the pandemic. To that end, programs,
partnerships, and resource networks were created to help support local small businesses as
they navigated and adapted to the adverse impacts. The attached report is a summary of those
collaborative efforts.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development. St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader
in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Prepared by: Julie Grove, community and economic development analyst
Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, economic development manager
Karen Barton, community development director, EDA executive director
Approved by: Kim Keller, city manager
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 5) Page 2
Title: COVID-19 local business assistance update
Discussion
Present considerations: The following is an update on the city’s small business assistance
activities and initiatives during the COVID -19 pandemic.
St. Louis Park Small Business Relief Fund (two grant rounds)
• Round 1 - In April 2020, the St. Louis Park EDA provided $224,000 in emergency
assistance to local businesses. Given the urgent need for assistance, staff worked
diligently to establish this emergency grant program in a matter of a few weeks. This
included creating an easy-to-complete, on-line application; grant agreements; outreach
program targeted at under-served small businesses; and setting up direct deposits to
ensure dollars got to the businesses as quickly as possible. Forty-six (46) local small
businesses received up to $5,000 in grants designed to help them sustain operations
and endure the economic hardships posed by the pandemic. A total of 35 (76%) of the
grants were provided to businesses owned or managed by women, veterans, or people
of color or in the indigenous community (27 women, four veteran, 13 people of color or
in the indigenous community). The grants were spread throughout the community. St.
Louis Park was among the first metro communities to distribute financial assistance to
its local businesses at the onset of the pandemic, and the first to provide the assistance
in the form of a grant (as opposed to a loan).
• Round 2 – In July 2020, the city partnered with Hennepin County’s Small Business Relief
Fund program to provide additional emergency financial assistance to local businesses
adversely impacted by COVID-19. Small businesses located in Hennepin County with up to
50 employees were eligible. Hennepin County provided $10 million in grants to businesses
countywide. Approximately, $600,000 of the county funding was allocated to St. Louis
Park businesses. The city’s EDA provided an additional $200,000 specifically for local
businesses. In total, 40 St. Louis Park businesses were selected to receive county funds
and an additional 15 were selected to receive EDA funds. Grant awards from the EDA
ranged from $5,000 to $15,000 depending on the amounts requested. Of the local small
businesses receiving assistance from the EDA, 10 (or 67 percent) were owned by women
and/or individuals who identify as BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color).
The following are a few of the comments received from Round 2 grant recipients.
Comments were provided by Hennepin County:
• Since the onset of the pandemic, [business] has been substantially down. The funds
helped stabilize my business, providing much needed funds to continue operating.
• We could not pay rent and maintain full employment without this assistance. Thank
you very much for your support and bolstering our business as we struggle to
navigate the seemingly endless challenges inherent to our current state of affairs. It
is meaningful and it is appreciated.
• The grant paid past due rent payments, so my lease was not terminated. I am happy
to be able to continue my business with the help of the grant.
• These funds allowed us to come current on the rent and to stay in business. Without
these funds it is very likely that we would have been forced to break our lease and
close indefinitely. The city employees made the application process quite seamless
and were very helpful.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 5) Page 3
Title: COVID-19 local business assistance update
• The funds gave us the breathing room to make sure we were able to pay our
employees on time and not default on our bills.
• We were closed in April and May, so the grant kept the store viable for reopening in
June. We would not be open without this assistance. Thank you!
• The grant enabled us to pay our rent and begin selling retail and service packages
online. We are so grateful for this assistance.
Marketing Assistance Program
To help local small businesses pivot and enhance their on-line marketing and sales during the
pandemic, the city created a website design and marketing assistance grant program in October
2020. Through this program the city covered the cost of up to $1,000 of new marketing services
provided by selected St. Louis Park based marketing firms. Fifty (50) businesses utilized this
grant program, and 13 local marketing firms provided the marketing services. A total of $50,000
was invested in this initiative.
Temporary Tent Reimbursement Program
In February 2021, the city launched a tent reimbursement program for specific business types
affected by restrictions from state emergency executive orders (such as restaurants, breweries,
distilleries, and fitness facilities). This reimbursement grant program reimbursed up to 50% of a
business’ cost to rent or purchase an outdoor tent up to a maximum of $5,000. A total of
$25,600 was utilized for this grant program. A total of six local businesses/non-profits utilized
this program.
Temporary outdoor customer service area permit
A temporary outdoor customer service area application was created to assist St. Louis Park
businesses reopen during the COVID-19 outbreak. It was intended to allow requests for
businesses to temporarily conduct business outside for things like outdoor seating, outdoor
tents, igloos, etc. Nine outdoor permits were received. Businesses that were able to utilize this
new permit included breweries, distilleries, fitness studies, and a few restaurants.
Business outreach
In the spring of 2020, city staff contacted its local businesses via phone calls and emails to gauge
the economic impact of the pandemic and how businesses were responding to the challenges it
presented. Staff reached out to over 2,500 local businesses, starting with the city’s small
businesses. The general theme of the contacts was to “check-in” on the businesses to see how
they were doing, let them know about the various resources available to them, answer
questions, respond to concerns, and see how the city could be of further assistance. Through
those calls staff has developed ongoing relationships with some local businesses and has created
an email list that is now used to provide continual updates/information to local businesses.
COVID website/Social Media
In an effort to keep local businesses and community members informed of the rapidly changing
COVID-19- related technical and financial assistance programs available to them, staff continually
monitored local, state, and federal resources to ensure that the most current and up to date
information was provided on the city’s website and posted on social media. Often times, grant
and loan programs had very short application windows, so it was critical to keep up to date and
push out the information as quickly as possible, including through direct phone calls and emails.
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 5) Page 4
Title: COVID-19 local business assistance update
Loan deferrals
With EDA consent, lenders participating in the EDA’s Revolving Loan Fund and 2% loan
programs provided loan deferrals to borrowers on an as-needed-basis to provide financial relief
during the outbreak. Typically, such deferrals were for six months.
Winter Postcard
Knowing that winter 2020/21 was going to present some unique challenges to local businesses
as they continued operating during COVID, the city distributed postcards to businesses with
ideas and information to help them adapt their customer experiences during the winter season.
Small Business Liaison
The city's small business liaison, Julie Grove, was an invaluable resource to the city’s local
businesses during the pandemic. She continually monitored available resources, ensured
information was distributed to the businesses in a timely fashion via emails, phone calls, social
media contact, and website updates. Julie continues to be a resource to local business and
prospective entrepreneurs in need of technical or financial assistance. The support includes
connecting businesses with available services and financing programs, answering policy or
program questions, assistance with city permits, helping find available properties, providing
contact information, communicating new program information, and listening to business
concerns.
Open to Business Program
The city’s Open to Business program in conjunction with the Metropolitan Consortium of
Community Developers (MCCD) continued offering free, one-on-one, confidential business
consulting during COVID. The program’s business advisors helped local small businesses and
entrepreneurs with technical assistance and financing needs to navigate and survive the
impacts from the pandemic.
During 2020, MCCD staff met with 19 local clients and provided 108 hours of service in the city.
Of the clients served, 63% were women, 31% were low income, and 37% were black,
Indigenous, and other persons of color. A total of $103,000 in loans were also provided to local
businesses. Additionally, MCCD facilitated grant applications for the DEED Small Busines
Emergency Loan grant for two salon clients. The total funding awarded was $60,000.
Furthermore, two microloans were provided to a Mexican restaurant and music studio. Each
loan was under $5,000.
In the first half of 2021, MCCD staff provided 56.5 hours of technical assistance to seven local
businesses/residents. Assistance was provided for early stage start up assistance, business plan
review, website development, pre-financing assistance, PPP assistance and forgiveness, loan
facilitation, existing loan maintenance and existing client TA, bookkeeping assistance, general
assistance around lease terms, pricing, and contract negotiation, strategic planning, marketing
campaigns.
MCCD was the co-administrator and funding agent for the Hennepin County federal CARES Act
Funding for the first two rounds of funding in 2020 including the Hennepin County Small Business
Relief Fund, and the Hennepin County Self-Employed Entrepreneur Fund. MCCD administered or
disbursed over 1,250 grants to business owners in Hennepin County accounting for $10,200,000
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 5) Page 5
Title: COVID-19 local business assistance update
in aggregate grant funding for these programs. A total of 19 grants were disbursed to St. Louis
Park businesses resulting in $120,200 in total grant funding in these programs.
Additional partnerships led by other agencies benefitting local businesses include:
Business District Recovery Program – marketing
In an effort to support area businesses/districts through the economic impacts of COVID-19,
Hennepin County created a Business District Recovery Marketing Program using $125,000 in
funds from the federal CARES Act. In the fall of 2020, St. Louis Park worked with Hennepin County
to select the Historic Walker Lake Business District for the program, which was one of only 11
businesses districts selected. Additionally, Hennepin County, through one of its consultants,
developed the Love Local Initiative, a marketing campaign to encourage communities and local
residents to support their local business districts safely through COVID-19.
Promotional materials included social media ads, digital ads, print ads, website banners; as well
as a guide to how to advertise on social media was provided to the business district. In addition
to marketing support, the Love Local Initiative also includes coordinated public space
improvements including wayfinding and artist-designed dome installations, to encourage
COVID-19 safety and enhance overall shopping experience.
Hennepin County small business relief funding
As of March 15, 2021, Hennepin County provided more than 6,400 Small Business Relief grants
totaling $69.4 million. The County held five application rounds through the Small Business
Relief fund, including the partnership round with the St. Louis Park EDA. A total of 298
Hennepin County small business relief grants were provided directly to St. Louis Park small
businesses. Of those, 37% were women owned businesses and .4% were identified as another
gender identity, non-binary, non-conforming, or other. In addition, businesses identified as the
following race, 0.4% American Indian/Native Alaskan, 9.6% Asian, 8.3% Black/African American,
5.3% Hispanic/LatinX, and 5.3% multi-racial.
Elevate Business HC
Staff have been working with Hennepin County on a new business initiative called Elevate
Business HC. This program offers free advising and other resources to help businesses recover
from the pandemic and build for future growth. Hennepin County has contracted with 25
professional business advisors, consultants, and service providers to offer advising and
consulting services. City staff have provided information to local businesses about the program
and have been working with Hennepin County to help business owners navigate and connect
with providers that offer the services for which they are seeking.
State/Federal Business Assistance Programs
Main Street COVID Relief Grant:
This past summer, funding for new business assistance programs was passed by the legislature.
Utilizing these funds, the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
(DEED) has begun to roll out new grant programs for businesses and non-profits. The most
recent program is the Minnesota Main Street COVID Relief Grant. A total of $64,200,000 is
available in grants for Minnesotan owned and operated businesses that can demonstrate
financial hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Businesses that are majority-owned by
military veterans, women, and Black, Indigenous and people of color individuals; employ six
Study session meeting of October 11, 2021 (Item No. 5) Page 6
Title: COVID-19 local business assistance update
people or fewer; and/or did not receive previous assistance from other state relief programs
will be prioritized in the selection process. Applicants that qualify and are selected will receive a
grant amount between $10,000 and $25,000 based on the number of full-time equivalent
(FTEs) employees on staff. Applications were accepted September 10-29, 2021.
Information on this program has been shared with local businesses via email, social media,
phone calls and is also available on the city’s website.
COVID EIDL loans
In September 2021, the SBA announced major enhancements to the COVID Economic Injury
Disaster Loan (EIDL) program. These include increasing the EIDL cap from $500,000 to $2
million, implementation of a two-year deferred payment period, expansion of eligible use of
funds to allow prepayment of commercial debt, and a simplification of requirements to ease
the application process. Applications for EIDL loans will be accepted until December 31, 2021.
Applications are located on the SBA website at sba.gov/eidl.
Next steps: Staff will continue supporting and adapting resources for local business as they face
the ongoing challenges created by the pandemic and Delta variant. Staff will also continue
alerting local businesses of various additional technical and financial assistance programs as
they become available.
Please contact economic development staff with any questions.