HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/03/17 - ADMIN - Minutes - Planning Commission - RegularMeeting: City council
Meeting date: April 19, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4f
Official minutes
Planning commission
March 17, 2021 – 6:00 p.m.
WEBEX
Members present: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Jessica Kraft, Tom Weber
Members absent: Courtney Erwin
Staff present: Jennifer Monson, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther
Study Session
The study session commenced at 6:00 p.m.
1. Zoning ordinance amendment – fences
Mr. Morrison presented the report. The ordinance would allow six feet tall fences to the
side of a house on a corner lot when the house is not facing the side lot line adjacent to
a street, instead of facing the front lot line.
Commission Weber stated the zoning ordinance amendment is a good solution.
Commissioner Kraft agreed, adding this makes sense vs. coming up with multiple rules
for front and corner lots .
Commissioner Weber asked if the applicant’s fence would need to be shorter now, with
the amendment. Mr. Morrison stated the requested fence could still be up to six feet
tall with the proposed revision. The area proposed to have the four-foot limit is located
between the front face of the house and property line along the street (Texas Circle).
Mr. Morrison stated a public hearing will be scheduled for this topic in April with the
planning commission.
2. Home occupations
Mr. Morrison presented the report.
Chair Eckholm stated there are parking concerns possibly, but he noted noise issues are
more concerning. He added if the accessory building is a problem for city council, he
would be fine removing that piece.
City council meeting of April 19, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes March 17, 2021
Mr. Morrison stated the complaints that went to council were not about parking, they
were about the impacts resulting from home occupations being conducted in accessory
buildings.
Commissioner Weber asked if there is enforcement action if an occupation is moved to
the garage . Mr. Morrison stated yes there is. He noted that enforcement takes time and
is problematic in that the city will not contact a business unless staff sees or catches
them in the act of using the garage for their business.
Chair Eckholm asked what sort of businesses the nuisance cases are . Mr. Morrison
stated some are auto repair, storage of items in the garage, or employees coming over
to pick up items out of a garage, which creates traffic. He added sometimes it can be an
odor, such as paint or stain .
Commissioner Weber appreciated Mr. Morrison’s comments, but added if the extension
is to an ADU and a garage is not included, he is not sure what the difference is between
home or garage occupation. Mr. Morrison stated the home occupation is less likely to
create nuisance impacts for neighbors if it is being conducted in the dwelling as opposed
to a garage or shed. People may be more likely to conduct an activity that results in
odors, sound, or other nuisances when conducted in an accessory building than within
their own dwelling space.
Chair Eckholm asked if there might be more acceptance if the city allowed painting in a
shed vs. in a garage, and if removing garages solves 90% of the problem. Mr. Morrison
stated the city does not differentiate between a garage or a shed in the code they are
both accessory buildings.
Commissioner Kraft asked if garage attached to homes are considered an accessory use.
Mr. Morrison stated yes. She stated the spirit of the ordinance seems to be that the
home occupation is within the home and should not be noticeable. She stated she does
not think we need to pursue allowing home occupations in accessory buildings.
Commissioner Ben e ke asked if the 25% limit is applicable to the ADU. Mr. Morrison
stated it should, but also noted that if the occupant of the ADU is using more than 25%,
it would be difficult for city staff to know.
Mr. Walther stated when the ADU was created, it was defined as only when they are
designed to be separate units. He stated it there is a living space and flow between the
two areas, that is not technically an ADU .
Commissioner Beneke asked if all home occupation persons would need to get a permit,
so they know what the rules are . Mr. Morrison stated permits are required when
customers and students come to the site, we can amend the code to also require the
permit when an employee comes to the site. Otherwise, staff gets a lot of calls about the
rules for home occupations. We can use the website to make the information readily
City council meeting of April 19, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 3
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes March 17, 2021
available. Otherwise, whe n the city receives a complaint, we use the first encounter to
share the rules. We begin enforcement if they continue to violate the rules.
He stated this will be brought forward to the commission as a public hearing in April as
well.
3. Transit oriented development zoning districts
Ms. Monson presented the report.
Chair Eckholm stated he does support the vision shown within the presentation and
appreciates the adjustments to the stations that has evolved over time. He added he
would like to see a discussion around what can be done to make the crossing over
Hwy. 7 more walkable and pedestrian friendly.
Commissioner Weber asked about the commitment of NordicWare in the area and if
that has been done as we hoped they would. Ms. Monson stated their plan is what the
city had hoped for in the area, and also includes public space with their coffee shop also.
Commissioner Weber asked if the jobs station will be an opportunity or a challenge with
more people working from home since covid. Ms. Monson stated over time as market
shifts and more people are working from home, there is definitely opportunity there for
amendments to the code to allow for more mixed -use areas.
Commissioner Weber stated he supports the vision as well. Chair Eckholm added he
likes the mixed use along the Beltline corridor also. He asked if there has been any
interest from Methodist Hospital related to the healthcare area station. Ms. Monson
stated early on there was interest for medical uses in the area.
Mr. Walther added Methodist Hospital is always under continual change and
development of their property. He added they have been invited as a partner in the
Louisiana Station planning, especially since they are the largest employer in the city. Mr.
Walther stated the city has worked with Methodist on the north-south connection there
and also removing barriers in the area. He stated there is enormous opportunity here.
Chair Eckholm stated he has heard on Next Door recently there are no connections to
Minnehaha Creek within the city. He asked if there will be ways to make more public
connections to the creek.
Ms. Monson stated there are boardwalks west of the city’s municipal building. Mr.
Walther added there are walking areas along Methodist Hospital and a lot of work has
been done to re -meandering the creek in that area. He added the history of
contamination in the city has led to restoration and protecting the water quality as well,
especially in conjunction with the hospital and healthcare uses.
City council meeting of April 19, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 4
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes March 17, 2021
Commission er Kraft stated she appreciates all the connections and creating of new
nodes, adding they are only as effective as people being able to get access to these
connections within their neighborhoods. She asked if these will be park and rides at all,
and how easy will it be for folks to access the stations with car or bikes .
Ms. Monson stated the Beltline and Louisiana Stations will both have park and rides. Mr.
Walther stated there has also been acquisition of smaller properties in the area, near
the rail tracks, and those will eventually be used as more park and ride lots . He stated
there is no park and ride at the Wooddale Station.
Commissioner Weber asked if there has been any thought of using a shuttle to get folks
to the light rail stations . Ms. Monson stated there is no shuttle being considered at this
time but that Metro Transit will be adding or adjusting bus routes to better serve the
light rail stations.
Chair Eckholm asked if building materials, such as timber, would affect how high or large
buildings could be within the city limits . Ms. Monson stated the transit zoning districts
will provide opportunities where there could be higher height of buildings, adding that
Louisiana and Beltline could be those areas that would be more appropriate for this as
there is less single -family residential surrounding those stations.
Ms. Monson stated she will be sending a report to city council on the TOD zoning district
and the commission and council can discuss this further during their joint study session
on April 12.
Mr. Walther added the commission will also discuss their 2021 workplan with the
council, as well as regulations around single-family house sizes .
Mr. Walther also added that Commissioner Erwin will be leaving the commission and a
vacancy will be created on the commission now with her absence. She will continue to
serve on the commission through the end of May.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:38 p.m.