HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/07/06 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
JULY 6, 2021
The St. Louis Park City Council is meeting in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka
Blvd. in accordance with the most recent COVID-19 guidelines.
EDA 6:20 p.m.; Regular city council meeting at 6:30 p.m. – council chambers
Members of the public can attend the EDA/regular city council meeting in person or watch the
meeting by webstream at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17 and
HD channel 859). Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports.
Members of the public who want to address the city council during the regular meeting about
items on the agenda may attend the meeting in person or call the number noted below next to
the corresponding item. Call when the meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. and follow instructions
provided. Comments will be taken during each item in the order they are received and must
relate to an item on the current city council agenda.
•952.562.2886 – consent agenda items 4a-4j
•952.562.2887 – item 6a – Angel Food/FrioFrio – on-sale intoxicating liquor license
•952.562.2888 – item 8a – Appoint Kimberly R. Keller as city manager and approve agreement
•952.562.2886 – item 8b – Semi-truck parking ordinance
6:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – council chambers
1.Call to order
2.Roll call
3.Approval of minutes -- None
4.Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar
Recommended action:**Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on
the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively:
Motion to add or remove items from agenda, or move items from consent calendar to regular
agenda for discussion.)
4a. Accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of May 29 through June 25,
2021.
4b. Adopt EDA Resolution approving the preliminary development agreement between the
EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation.
7.New business
7a. Resolution of support for tax increment financing assistance – Rise on 7
Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution supporting the provision of tax
increment financing assistance for CommonBond Communities’ proposed Rise on 7
development should it subsequently be proven necessary.
Meeting of July 6, 2021
City council agenda
6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – council chambers
1.Call to order
1a. Pledge of allegiance
1b. Roll call
2. Presentations -- none
3.Approval of minutes
3a. Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
3b. Study session minutes of May 24, 2021
3c. Special study session minutes of June 15, 2021
3d. Special study session minutes of June 17, 2021
3e. Special study session minutes of June 21, 2021
3f. City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
4.Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar
Recommended action: **Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the
consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add
or remove items from the agenda, or move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
4a. Accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of May 29 through June 25, 2021.
4b. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance adding Section 36-268-PUD 19 to the zoning
code and amending the zoning map from RC high-density multiple-family residence to PUD
19 and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication.
4c. • Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance vacating the slope easement along the
west side of Beltline Boulevard between Park Glen Road and 35th Street West and
approve the Summary Ordinance for publication
(requires 5 affirmative votes);
•Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance adding section 36-268-PUD 20 to the
zoning code and amending the zoning map from MX-1 vertical mixed-use to PUD 20
and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication
(requires 5 affirmative votes).
4d. Approve the second reading and adopt Ordinance amending chapter 36 pertaining to
the animal handling uses and approve summary ordinance for publication.
4e. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 15 of the
zoning code relating to previous development approvals for Parkway Residences phase
III and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication.
4f. Adopt Resolution to recognize Mark Hoppe for his 21 years of service.
4g. Adopt Resolution authorizing the installation of parking restrictions on the south side
of 43rd 1/2 Street and the cul-de-sac west of Wooddale Avenue.
4h. Adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service
line at 3029 Monterey Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 06-028-24-12-0012.
4i. Adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service
line at 4530 Vallacher Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 07-028-24-12-0059.
4j. Accept for planning commission minutes of June 2, 2021.
Meeting of July 6, 2021
City council agenda
5. Boards and commissions
5a. Appointment to Environment and Sustainability Commission
Recommended action: Motion to appoint JD Moore to the Environment and Sustainability
Commission for a term beginning on July 15, 2021 and ending May 31, 2022.
6. Public hearings
6a. Angel Food LLC dba Angel Food/FrioFrio – on-sale intoxicating liquor license
Recommended action: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close
public hearing. Motion to approve application from Angel Food LLC dba Angel Food/
FrioFrio for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license located at 8100 Minnetonka Blvd.
7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – None
8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items
8a. Appoint Kimberly R. Keller as city manager and approve employment agreement
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution appointing Kimberly R. Keller as city
manager subject to the terms and conditions of the employment contract.
8b. First reading of semi-truck parking ordinance
Recommended action: Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance regarding general
parking and set second reading for August 2, 2021.
9. Communications – None
**NOTE: The consent calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or
which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either
a councilmember or a member of the public, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the
regular agenda for discussion.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular city council meetings are carried live on civic TV cable channel 17
and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at
www.parktv.org, and saved for video on demand replays. During the COVID-19 pandemic, agendas will be posted on Fridays on
the entrance doors to city hall and on the text display on civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available after
noon on Friday on the city’s website.
If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2525.
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4a
Executive summary
Title: Approval of EDA disbursements
Recommended action: Motion to accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of
May 29 through June 25, 2021.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with
Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA bylaws?
Summary: The finance division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and
approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those
by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s
charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: EDA disbursements
Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk
Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager/EDA executive director
6/29/2021 9:26:25
R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
1Page -
CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK
Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
459,957.75BRIDGEWATER BANK GRANTS PUBLIC UTILITY/IMPROVEMENTS
459,957.75
1,000.00BROWN LESLIE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,000.00
57.60CENTERPOINT ENERGY MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES HEATING GAS
15.326211 CEDAR LK RD (DAHL PROP)HEATING GAS
72.92
5,000.00COPPERWINGDEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,000.00
1,642.50EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3.00PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,645.50
1,000.00FROZEN LOON LLC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,000.00
1,000.00FULL CIRCLE PHYSICAL THERAPY DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,000.00
1,000.00GOOEY KIDS DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,000.00
1,000.00GROW TO LIFE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LAND
1,000.00
8,370.00JAMES BRENNER SCULPTURE CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
8,370.00
473.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES LEGAL SERVICES
63.006211 CEDAR LK RD (DAHL PROP)LEGAL SERVICES
1,063.50DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES
1,599.50
3,000.00MINNESOTA JCC PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,000.00
3,500.00MIXED PRECIPITATION PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 2
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:26:25
R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check Summary
Note: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
3,500.00
3,000.00PRIMACY STRATEGY GROUP LLC.DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES
3,000.00
740.00REDICOMPSDEVELOPMENT - EDA BALANCE SHEE PREPAID EXPENSES
1,480.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
2,220.00
33,118.37ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB
33,118.37
5,000.00THAI CULTURAL COUNCIL OF MN DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,000.00PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10,000.00
1,000.00THE POWER HOUSE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,000.00
1,338.12WANG ROBERT DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE
1,338.12
99.90WHIPPER SNAPPER LAWN SERVICE 7015 WALKER-RYNLDS WELDING LAND MAINTENANCE
249.76BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LAND MAINTENANCE
199.80MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES LAND MAINTENANCE
149.86HWY 7 & LOUISIANA LAND MAINTENANCE
699.32
69.34XCEL ENERGY MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES ELECTRIC SERVICE
21.206211 CEDAR LK RD (DAHL PROP)ELECTRIC SERVICE
90.54
2,200.00YUKI TOKUDA WICKHAM PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,200.00
589.12ZAHNER JOSEPH DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE
589.12
Report Totals 542,401.14
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 3
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4b
Executive summary
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing
Corporation
Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution approving the preliminary
development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA support the proposed preliminary development agreement
with Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation (GMHC) which formalizes the respective
parties’ obligations relative to preparing an affordable housing development plan for the
Minnetonka Boulevard redevelopment site?
Summary: At the June 28, 2021 study session, the EDA received a report related to staff’s latest
efforts to pursue development of owner-occupied affordable housing on the four single-family
properties recently purchased by the EDA, located at 5639, 5643, 5647 and 5707 Minnetonka
Boulevard. As noted, staff has been working with GMHC to determine affordable housing
redevelopment options for the subject parcels, including a first-generation homeownership
option. GMHC is partnering with Homes within Reach to potentially include a community land
trust for the redevelopment.
To continue working with GMHC and move forward on proposed redevelopment options for
the site, the EDA has been asked to enter into a preliminary development agreement (PDA)
with GMHC. The purpose of the PDA is to formalize the parties’ respective responsibilities
relative to the Minnetonka Blvd redevelopment project consistent with the parties’ mutual
objectives. The PDA also provides GMHC with formal permission to access the site to conduct
its due diligence. Additionally, the agreement provides guidance on applying for land use and
zoning changes as well as financial assistance. During the term of the PDA, GMHC would be
provided with exclusive rights to negotiate acquisition of the subject property from the EDA.
The PDA would terminate if: (1) the EDA has not approved a purchase and redevelopment
contract with GMHC by June 30, 2022, or (2) by mutual written agreement of the parties or a
determination by either party that negotiations have reached an impasse.
Financial or budget considerations: The precise purchase price of the EDA parcels and the
amount of financial assistance necessary to move the proposed Minnetonka Boulevard
redevelopment forward will require further discussion once the project’s components are fully
defined. It’s anticipated that implementation of the proposed redevelopment plans for the
Minnetonka Blvd site will require financial assistance from the city and/or the EDA.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Location map; EDA Resolution; Preliminary development agreement
Prepared by: Julie Grove, economic development specialist
Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, economic development coordinator
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager/EDA executive director
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
Location map of Minnetonka Boulevard redevelopment site
Minnetonka Blvd
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
EDA Resolution No. 21 - ____
Resolution approving a Preliminary Development
Agreement between the
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and
Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
Whereas, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to
469.1082, as amended, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”)
administers its Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the “Project”), for the purpose of facilitating the
redevelopment of certain substandard property within the Project; and
Whereas, the Authority owns certain property within the Project (the “Authority
Parcel”), which Property has been the subject of certain preliminary negotiations with Greater
Metropolitan Housing Corporation (the “Developer”); and
Whereas, the Development Property has been the subject of certain preliminary
negotiations between the parties for purposes of constructing a medium density housing
development on the Development Property; and
Whereas, the Authority and the Developer have negotiated a Preliminary Development
Agreement (the “Agreement”), providing for the performance of certain activities on the part of
the parties in preparation for the negotiation of a definitive Purchase and Redevelopment
Contract in connection with the Development Property, as presented for the Authority’s
consideration; and
Whereas, the Board has reviewed the Agreement and finds that the approval and
execution of the Agreement are in the best interest of the City and its residents and will spur
redevelopment of underutilized and blighted property, expand ownership opportunities, and
enhance the City’s tax base.
Now therefore be it resolved by the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority
that the Agreement as presented to the Board of Commissioners is hereby in all respects
approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that
are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the
Agreement by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval.
It is further resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to
execute on behalf of the Authority the Agreement, and any documents referenced therein
requiring execution by the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority, its obligations
thereunder.
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 4
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
It is further resolved that Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any
actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Board of Commissioners
July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, executive director Tim Brausen, president
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, secretary
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 5
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT dated this ___ day of July, 2021, by and between the St. Louis Park
Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic and a political subdivision
of the State of Minnesota (the “Authority”); and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation, a
Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the “Developer”):
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the Authority desires to promote development of certain property currently
owned by the Authority within Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the “Project”) in the City of St.
Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), which property is described in Exhibit A attached hereto (the
“Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Developer has proposed to acquire the Property and to develop
approximately eight twin home style units for low- to moderate-income individuals thereon (the
“Development”); and
WHEREAS, the Authority has determined that it is in its best interest that the Developer
be designated sole developer of the Property during the term of this Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Authority and Developer are willing and desirous to undertake the
Development if (i) a satisfactory agreement can be reached regarding the conveyance of the
Property to the Developer; (ii) satisfactory mortgage and equity financing, or adequate cash
resources, for the Development can be secured by the Developer; (iii) there is satisfactory
resolution of zoning, land use and site design issues; and (iv) the economic feasibility and
soundness of the Development and other necessary preconditions have been determined to the
satisfaction of the parties.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and
obligations set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. The parties agree to work cooperatively towards defining the Development and its
components (including but not limited to site design, building plans and specifications, number of
affordable residential units, building stories and height, sustainable and equitable development
components, stormwater management, streets and sidewalks, and all other necessary public
infrastructure improvements), determining its financial feasibility, the infrastructure necessary to
service it, and the approvals necessary to bring it to fruition, as well as to negotiate in good faith
toward a definitive Purchase and Redevelopment Contract (the “Contract”) and a related planning
development contract regarding the Development, all generally consistent with the concept
proposal for the Development presented to the Authority by the Developer on June 28, 2021 (the
“Concept Proposal”). Certain particulars of the Concept Proposal, including initial renderings and
site plan, are attached hereto as Exhibit B. It is the intention of the parties that this Agreement (a)
documents the present understanding and commitments of the parties and (b) will lead to
negotiation and execution of a mutually satisfactory Contract prior to the termination date of this
Agreement. The Contract (together with any other agreements entered into between the parties
hereto contemporaneously therewith) when executed, will supersede all obligations of the parties
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 6
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
hereunder. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Authority shall have no obligation
to provide any financial assistance to the Developer or approve any action in connection with the
Development unless and until the Authority formally approves a definitive Contract.
2. During the term of this Agreement, the Developer shall perform the following:
(a) Developer shall prepare a project pro forma (including a detailed list of
various revenue sources and the respective amounts necessary to bring the Development
to fruition) and submit it to the Authority for its review.
(b) Developer shall work to secure satisfactory mortgage and equity financing,
and additional forms of financing necessary to bring the Development to fruition. The
Authority will cooperate with Developer in connection with any application for grants or
similar funds to be applied to the Development.
(c) The Developer agrees to complete an Application for Tax Increment Finance
Assistance (the “Application”) and to pay the required application fee of $3,000 to the
Authority, in addition to the Initial Deposit described in paragraph 10 hereof.
(d) Developer understands the Development will be subject to the City’s Green
Building Policy and Inclusionary Housing Policy in effect at the time of execution of the
Contract, and agrees to abide by the requirements of such policies if the parties enter into the
Contract.
3. In connection with this Agreement, Authority hereby grants to the Developer, its
agents, employees, officers, and contractors (the “Authorized Parties”) a right of entry on the Property
for the purpose of performing all due diligence work and inspections deemed necessary by the
Developer to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement (the “Permitted Activities”). The Authorized
Parties shall have access to the Property five (5) days a week between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00
p.m. to perform the Permitted Activities. Developer hereby agrees to be responsible for any and all
costs related to the Permitted Activities conducted on Property, and to restore the Property to its
original condition upon completion of the Permitted Activities. Developer agrees to indemnify, save
harmless, and defend the Authority and its officers and employees, from and against any and all
claims, actions, damages, liability and expense in connection with personal injury and/or damage to
the Property arising from or out of any occurrence in, upon or at the Property to the extent caused by
the act or omission of the Authorized Parties in conducting the Permitted Activities on the Property,
except (a) to the extent caused by the negligence, gross negligence, willful misrepresentation or any
willful or wanton misconduct by the Authority, its officers, employees, agents or contractors; and (b)
to the extent caused by a “Pre-Existing Condition” as defined in this paragraph 7. “Pre-Existing
Condition” shall mean any geologic or soil condition, any defect in the condition of improvements
located on the Property, or any condition caused by the existence of hazardous substances or materials
in, on, or under Property, including without limitation hazardous substances released or discharged
into the drainage systems, soils, groundwater, waters or atmosphere, which condition existed as of the
date of this Agreement and became known or was otherwise disclosed or discovered by reason of the
Authorized Parties’ entry onto the Property.
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 7
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
4. The Authority agrees to cooperate with the Developer in determining the municipal
regulatory or other approvals required for the Development including, but not limited to, land use
amendments to the Comprehensive Plan, zoning and plat changes, permits, and any other necessary
municipal or other approvals.
5. The Authority agrees to cooperate with the Developer in obtaining guidance from the
City on Developer’s applications for any approvals or land use guidance and zoning and plat changes
that may be required in connection with the Development. However, the Authority makes no
guarantees as to any approvals or land use guidance and zoning and plat changes that may be required
in connection with the Development.
6. The Authority agrees to direct its staff and legal and financial consultants to review
and analyze the Application and the Development’s pro forma and help determine the terms of tax
increment or other financial assistance required for the Development, the cost of which analysis
incurred by the Authority shall be paid by Developer pursuant to paragraph 10 hereof. The Developer
will cooperate with the Authority’s review and analysis and provide to the Authority all documents
and information reasonably requested by the Authority in connection with that effort.
7. If, in the Authority’s sole discretion, the Development is feasible and public financial
assistance is indicated, the Authority and the Developer will negotiate towards a definitive Contract
providing generally for (a) purchase of the Authority Parcel by the Developer; (b) tax increment
assistance in an amount determined by the Authority to be necessary to make the Development
financially feasible; and (c) timely construction of the Development by Developer.
8. It is expressly understood that execution and implementation of a Contract shall be
subject to;
(a) A determination by the Authority in its sole discretion that its undertakings are
feasible based on (i) the projected tax increment revenues and any other revenues designated
by the Authority, including any grants; (ii) the purposes and objectives of any tax increment,
development, or other plan created or proposed for the purpose of providing financial
assistance for the Development; and (iii) the best interests of the City and Authority.
(b) A determination by the Authority that any financial assistance is reasonably
necessary in order to make the Development financially feasible, and that any such assistance
is limited to the amount necessary to achieve financial feasibility based on Developer’s pro
forma and review of all the facts and circumstances.
(c) A determination by Developer that the Development is feasible and in the
best interests of the Developer.
9. This Agreement is effective for a term ending June 30, 2022, unless extended by
mutual agreement of the parties. The Executive Director of the Authority is authorized to execute
any such extension on behalf of the Authority.
10. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Authority acknowledges receipt from the
Developer of a deposit in the amount of $23,000 (the “Initial Deposit”), from which funds the
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 8
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
Authority may pay any third-party out-of-pocket costs incurred by the Authority or City in
connection with the Exhibit B activities for furthering the Development from and after the date of
this Agreement (hereafter, the “Authority Costs”). If at any time after the date of this Agreement
the Authority determines that Authority Costs will exceed the Initial Deposit, the Authority may
notify the Developer of the amount of such additional costs. Within ten calendar days of receipt
of said notice, the Developer shall deliver to the Authority the required additional funds. If a
Contract is successfully negotiated, any unused balance in the funds deposited under this Section
10 shall be returned to the Developer upon execution of the Contract (unless the parties specify
otherwise in the Contract).
If this Agreement is terminated in accordance with its terms, the Authority will return to
the Developer the balance of any funds deposited under this section as of the date of receipt of the
notice of termination, less any Authority Costs incurred through the date of receipt of the notice
of termination. For the purposes of this paragraph, Authority Costs are considered to be incurred
if they have been paid, relate to services performed, or are payable under a contract entered into,
on or before the date of receipt of the notice of termination.
11. This Agreement may be terminated upon ten (10) days written notice by any party
to the others if:
(i) A party fails to perform any of its obligations hereunder, and fails to cure
the default within 30 days after receipt of written notice thereof; or
(ii) In the sole judgment of the Authority, an impasse has been reached in the
negotiation of any material term or condition of the Contract.
Upon termination under this paragraph, no party thereafter shall have any liability or obligations
to the other except as otherwise provided in paragraph 10 hereof.
12. Developer is designated as sole developer of the Property during the term of this
Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, the Authority agrees that it will not negotiate or
contract with any other party concerning the development or sale of any portion of the Property.
The Developer shall not assign or transfer its rights under this Agreement in full or in part without
the prior written consent of the Authority.
13. In the event that either party, its heirs, successors or assigns, fails to comply with
any of the provisions of this Agreement, the non-defaulting party may proceed to enforce this
Agreement by appropriate legal or equitable proceedings, or other similar proceedings.
14. If any portion of this Agreement is held invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such decision shall not affect the validity of any remaining portion of the Agreement.
15. In the event any covenant contained in this Agreement should be breached by one
party and subsequently waived by the other party, such waiver shall be limited to the particular
breach so waived and shall not be deemed to waive any other concurrent, previous or subsequent
breach.
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 9
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
16. Notice or demand or other communication between or among the parties shall be
sufficiently given if sent by mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested or delivered personally:
(a) As to the Authority: 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard
St. Louis Park, MN 55416-2216
Attn: Executive Director
(b) As to the Developer: 15 South Fifth Street, Ste 710
Minneapolis, MN 55402
Attn: President
17. This Agreement may be executed simultaneously by manual or electronic signature
in any number of counterparts, all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument.
18. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be
heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection
to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on convenience or otherwise.
(The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.)
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 10
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Authority has caused this Agreement to be duly executed
in its name and behalf and its seal to be duly affixed hereto and the Developer has caused this
Agreement to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.
ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY
By: ______________________________
Tim Brausen, its President
By: _______________________________
Thomas K. Harmening, its Executive Director
GREATER METROPOLITAN HOUSING
CORPORATION
By: ________________________________
Its ___________________________
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 11
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
EXHIBIT A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
5639 Minnetonka Blvd
Lot 6, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 323, Hennepin County, MN
5643 Minnetonka Blvd
TORRENS-Lot 5, Auditor's Subdivision No. 323, Hennepin County, Minn.
5647 Minnetonka Blvd
Lot 4, Auditor’s Subdivision No. 323, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
5707 Minnetonka Blvd
Tract A, Registered Land Survey No. 1105, Hennepin County, Minnesota.
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 11
Title: Preliminary development agreement between the EDA and Greater Metropolitan Housing Corporation
EXHIBIT B
Concept Proposal
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Action agenda item: 7a
Executive summary
Title: Resolution of support for tax increment financing assistance – Rise on 7
Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution supporting the provision of tax
increment financing assistance for CommonBond Communities’ proposed Rise on 7
development should it subsequently be proven necessary.
Policy consideration: Is the EDA willing to approve a resolution expressing support for
CommonBond’s application to Minnesota Housing for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits in
connection with its Rise on 7 development and support for the provision of tax increment
financing in an amount not to exceed $1.2 million, should it subsequently be proven necessary?
Summary: CommonBond Communities is seeking financing from Minnesota Housing and other
public agencies for its proposed Rise on 7 affordable housing development to be located at
8115 State Highway 7. Despite these sources, CommonBond’s project proforma will likely
exhibit a funding gap and therefore applied to the EDA for tax increment financing (TIF)
assistance. Ehlers, the EDA’s financial consultant, and staff reviewed the project’s initial
proforma and have tentatively determined that approximately $1.2 million in TIF assistance is
warranted to enable the affordable multifamily housing development to become financially
feasible and proceed. The exact amount of assistance won’t be known until all other financing
sources have been secured and development costs are more definitive, at which point, staff will
present a more specific recommendation for TIF assistance to the EDA/City Council.
CommonBond has requested the EDA adopt a resolution expressing support for its application
to Minnesota Housing for Low-Income Housing Tax Credits and support for the provision of tax
increment financing in an amount not to exceed $1.2 million, should it subsequently be proven
necessary. According to CommonBond, such a commitment of TIF assistance would help make
the development’s July application more competitive, as most funders count other public
funding sources as leverage resulting in a higher score. Applications with the highest scores are
most likely to be funded.
Financial or budget considerations: The attached resolution states that the EDA supports
providing tax increment assistance to facilitate construction of the Rise on 7 development in an
amount not to exceed $1.2 million. The final TIF amount is contingent upon verification of
financial need based on the project’s final proforma, as well as other requirements of the TIF
Act. Once CommonBond receives commitments from Minnesota Housing and other funders,
and its need for financial assistance is further confirmed by Ehlers, staff will present a more
specific TIF assistance recommendation for subsequent EDA review and approval.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: EDA resolution
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, economic development coordinator
Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager, EDA executive director
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 7a) Page 2
Title: Resolution of support for tax increment financing assistance – Rise on 7
EDA Resolution No. 21- ____
Resolution expressing support for the proposed use of tax increment financing
for a mixed-use multifamily affordable housing development to be developed
by CommonBond Communities
Whereas, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) has
received a request to assist an entity to be formed by CommonBond Communities (the
“Developer”) with certain costs of construction of a proposed mixed-use development including
approximately 120 units of multifamily rental housing intended to be affordable to individuals
and families at 30 to 80 percent of area median income, to be located in the City of St. Louis
Park (the “City”) and known as Rise on 7 (the “Project”); and
Whereas, a stated goal of the City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy is to act as a partner in
creating affordable housing development for the community; and
Whereas, the success of the Developer’s application for low-income housing tax credits
in connection with the Project is predicated on local support of the proposal; and
Whereas, the Developer has requested that the Authority indicate its support of the use
of tax increment for the Project; and
Whereas, Authority staff has reviewed the proposal and recommends that the Board of
Commissioners support the use of tax increment for the Project.
Now, therefore be it resolved that the Board of Commissioners supports the Project
and the use of pay-as-you-go tax increment financing assistance for the Project in an estimated
amount not to exceed $1,200,000; provided, however, that authorization of tax increment
financing for the Project is solely within the discretion of the City and of the Board of
Commissioners following all legally required proceedings pursuant to Minnesota Statues
469.174 through 469.1794, as amended, including (i) a public hearing and approval by the City
Council of the City; (ii) a determination, based on an analysis performed by the City’s municipal
advisor, that tax increment financing assistance is necessary for the financial feasibility of the
Project; (iii) verification of development financing need, based on an analysis performed by the
City’s municipal advisor, that substantiates that “but for” the use of tax increment financing,
the Project would be unable to proceed; and (iv) the negotiation of a development agreement
including (among other things) the conditions under which the City or the Authority will provide
financial assistance.
It is further resolved that the Board of Commissioners supports the Developer’s
application to Minnesota Housing for low-income tax credits for the Project.
It is further resolved that Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any
actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution.
Economic development authority meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 7a) Page 3
Title: Resolution of support for tax increment financing assistance – Rise on 7
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority July 6, 2021
Thomas K Harmening, executive director Tim Brausen, president
Attest:
Melisa Kennedy, secretary
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Minutes: 3a
Unofficial minutes
City council study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
May 10, 2021
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris,
Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog
Councilmembers absent: none
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), CIO (Mr. Pires), Director of Operations and
Recreation (Ms. Walsh), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), CFO (Ms. Schmitt), Police Chief
Harcey, Fire Chief Koering, Building and Energy Director (Mr. Hoffman), Director of Community
Development (Ms. Barton), Community Organizer (Mr. Gray), Communications Manager (Ms.
Smith), Interim Administrative Services Officer (Ms. Solano)
Guests: Virginia Mancini, HRC Chair, Paul Baudhuin and Jamie Chismar, HRC members
1. Human rights commission 2021 workplan review
Ms. Mancini presented. She noted the HRC has worked to support the council and the city on
their racial equity goals. They worked on community outreach and developed partnerships with
others in the city. In February 2020, they had their first event which got them started and
helped them begin actionable goals.
Ms. Mancini stated their workplan involved action and developing partnerships. They decided
this summer would be a summer of action and this is how they developed this event, theme,
and subcommittee. The HRC wants to be a community-oriented group, working on racial justice
work within a racial equity lens.
Ms. Mancini noted they worked on past policies and practices and looked at what they want to
see in St. Louis Park moving forward. She added their work plan also focused on the HRC bylaws
and updating the language. Ms. Mancini stated the HRC desires to work closer with council on
racial equity goals and mission and to advise council. She noted the HRC has not been asked for
advice from the council over the last few years, and they want to work on this as well.
Councilmember Kraft asked what they worked on with the bylaws. Ms. Mancini stated a lawyer
on the HRC, along with the St. Louis Park school superintendent, helped update language. She
noted the desire of the HRC is to help council build capacity to address issues as they come up.
They want to develop another subcommittee and work to support council and communicate
more clearly with council.
Councilmember Kraft asked if this is related to clarity on a purpose for the HRC. Ms. Mancini
answered yes, and questioned if the HRC is an advisory board, what they advise council on. She
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
asked if the HRC was developed in response to hate crime, or other issues. She noted the
resolution on conversion therapy as an example.
Councilmember Kraft asked about building capacity for council and what that means. Ms.
Mancini asked what racial equity work means for the council, and what is the council’s role in
this, as well as what is the HRC’s role in that work – adding it is not clear to the HRC what that
role is.
Councilmember Kraft stated it seems the HRC is unclear on what the council wants from the
committee. Ms. Mancini agreed and asked what the HRC relationship is with council and what
council wants that to be.
Councilmember Kraft stated he feels council is siloed from commissions and he thinks this
workplan process is something that should be done earlier in the process – including priorities,
and then have the council give guidance. He added he has specific goals as well that he can
share later.
Councilmember Rog appreciated the HRC workplan. She agreed with Councilmember Kraft’s
comments and stated this is something the council is continuing to work on with commissions
and how they can be best utilized. She stated the council needs to do work around all boards
and commissions. She stated she wants to validate what Ms. Mancini has said. She added the
sooner the HRC can get dates set for the summer events, the better, and she looks forward to
the George Floyd event.
Councilmember Rog stated the portion about reviewing city code is interesting and asked what
the HRC is proposing and how they would do this work with staff. Ms. Mancini stated the city
code has not been updated since 1976. Mr. Harmening, however, stated the city code is
updated and amended all the time.
Ms. Solano stated there is some general clean up to do and the HRC would like to look at it,
make recommendations, and work with staff to re-write, and then send to council for approval.
Councilmember Rog stated she supports this work on the code by HRC, adding a thorough
review with an equity lens could be fruitful.
Councilmember Rog stated she supports the updates HRC made to the bylaws. Ms. Mancini
stated the idea of how the HRC advises council is their main concern, and lending the equity
lens to the process, as part of this advising.
Mr. Baudhuin stated the HRC felt the lack of nimbleness to say to the community that we see
you and we understand you, as an HRC and a council, seemed a concern. He asked how can the
HRC help the council and city at large respond to these types of things in a timely manner,
adding if it comes a month after the fact, it becomes noise.
Ms. Chismar stated she likes the idea of making statements, but the city needs to look hard at
its communications strategy and move forward in the best way. She added statements are
concrete and that is why people latch on to them. But she added there should be a better way
to communicate.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
Ms. Mancini added there is a fear of the HRC that human rights are addressed in the
community to make it a better place. She stated the HRC wants to do something, and
sometimes silence is also a choice.
Councilmember Rog asked how we can capture these ideas today and what are the action
steps. She also stated as a former member of the HRC, she believes the city should look at the
HRC having an independent communications channel and a way to communicate directly to the
city to avoid delays.
Councilmember Harris appreciated the presentation and asked how the HRC can create
systemic change within the community. She noted events, communications, bylaws, city codes
and added she would like to see the work of the HRC move outside of the values area and into
the rudimentary portion of city work. She asked if it is possible for the HRC to have a lens on
planning and development for example, or other areas of city operations, so as to have the
equity lens imbedded in everything the city does.
Councilmember Harris noted she is not in favor of adding a communications channel for a
commission and is not in favor of ongoing statements either. She stated she is more interested
in actions that are influencing city systems and can create lasting change.
Councilmember Mohamed asked what the HRC needs direction on or permission from the
council, to act on. Ms. Mancini stated being nimble and flexible, as well as responsive would be
helpful. She stated there is some ambiguity and being responsive is important, adding it does
feel like HRC has to ask for permission and communication is part of that.
Councilmember Mohamed asked if the HRC needs permission from council or the city to host
an event or do outreach. Ms. Mancini stated HRC has not done many events as yet, but since it
is part of their work plan, they do not need council guidance or permission. She added HRC can
be dragged down by some of the protocols they must follow.
Mr. Baudhuin added he is learning he does not know a lot about city government. He stated
since being on the HRC, he has seen the policies and procedures in city government can be
barriers for things to move along in a meaningful pace. He added a healthy tension between a
HRC and a council is helpful, in order to get past these barriers.
Councilmember Mohamed agreed with Mr. Baudhuin’s comments. She added racial equity and
social justice is very personal to her. She stated the power of the HRC comes from the people
and the activities they are doing. Councilmember Mohamed added she understands the HRC’s
comments on communications issues, but this will need to be an ongoing discussion. She stated
she likes the events they have planned for this summer and she is excited to participate.
Councilmember Mohamed added this year she has seen so many statements going out from
cities with nothing to back it. She asked what is being done and stated the HRC is the solution
here.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
Ms. Chismar stated different people need to be engaged in different ways. She added there
should be no rapid communications without a gatekeeper.
Ms. Mancini stated what the HRC wants is to work directly with council and work on city goals,
adding she does not want to lose site of what is important to the HRC, and to uplift community
members and work on the commission’s goals.
Councilmember Dumalag asked for a copy of the HRC bylaws. Ms. Solano stated every
commission has a set of bylaws and she will ensure the council has copies.
Councilmember Dumalag noted the HRC commented on the statement about the situation in
Atlanta and the resolution was not fast enough. She noted the action is more important in a
situation like this and added she has concerns that racial equity might be reduced to
statements and resolutions. She prefers the HRC work on city code, and language in bylaws,
which all impact how city residents live, and would be helpful to council. She stated this is how
she perceives the importance of the HRC in St. Louis Park.
Ms. Mancini agreed, adding the HRC wants to be of use to the council. Councilmember Rog
stated council’s concerns are around policy, zoning, housing policy, and a multiple set of eyes
would be helpful to council.
Councilmember Kraft added the city aims for the racial equity policy of the city and he sees the
HRC as the bridge to this. He added the council also needs to advise the HRC as well.
Councilmember Brausen stated he was also on the HRC back in the 1980s and even then, there
were conversations about the role of the HRC and the council. He stated the council does need
to hear from the HRC regularly and ask for the council to respond on issues as they arise. He
added he has worked on human rights for many years and it is a passion for him. He thanked
them for their work on the census and the election, and indicated anything he can do to help
with the summer events, he is happy to. He stated on the communication piece, statements are
appreciated, but the council has the role to make statements to the city. He added, however,
he does worry about these statements just becoming noise. He stated the council needs to talk
in a unified voice, through the Mayor or Police Chief, and to reflect the positions of city input,
which is not always in agreement.
Ms. Mancini stated she recognizes there needs to be a unified voice, she added it is different to
achieve change if you have to operate in the system in place. She added to achieve the change
she would like to see in the community, there will need to be push back on the system. She
stated this is what she wants council to look at. She stated she respects the council’s thoughts,
but there are times when the system needs to be changed, and she will want to push back at
times. She added the HRC will assert themselves more with their concerns to the council as well
in the future.
Ms. Chismar added she appreciates the council helping the HRC find their role, and the
challenge will be to find the process. She stated the HRC needs more tools in their tool kit
related to communication, and noted she is excited about the commission’s work.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
Councilmember Rog stated communications can be a barrier on city events. Ms. Solano stated
communications staff is working on city events currently and will be posting information in the
coming days.
Councilmember Kraft stated as the HRC talks about roles, please be as specific as possible. He
noted on the bylaws changes, he has not heard about a defined problem as yet, so he would
like to hear about that before having the HRC working on other commission bylaws. He also
noted on public statements he would like to see the HRC create a requirement for a response
policy including timeliness and a checklist on response. He added he likes the summer of action,
but it looks very ambitious, adding that fewer things done well might be best. He stated specific
things such as commission diversity would be helpful for council to hear about, and also city
goals for election participation and how to do that. He added the advisor role is there for the
HRC to the council.
Mayor Spano stated more conversations need to happen with the HRC and the council. He
stated he is excited about the HRC workplan and hopes the council will be asked to participate
in these events. He noted the conversion therapy ban is on the council’s list of topics to discuss
and asked where the HRC is on this topic. Mr. Gray stated this should be included on the HRC
plan and is something the commission intends to review and provide recommendation on to
the council.
Mayor Spano asked when new members come onto the HRC, how much review of the bylaws
take place with new members. Ms. Mancini stated she did review the bylaws with Mr. Gray
when she came onto the HRC but noted they did not spend a lot of time on the bylaws as they
are mainly procedural.
Mayor Spano noted the bylaws state the roles and procedures and do need to be reviewed by
each commission ongoing. He stated related to statements and communications by the council,
anyone can make statements on their social media, but the concern is that a statement comes
from the council as a unified statement.
Mayor Spano asked what a partnership looks like with the HRC. Mr. Baudhuin stated when
tension is at play, then organizations function best. He stated he views the HRC as one point of
tension that pulls the council in a certain way, as it relates to the rights of all humans. He stated
tension is where energy is, and where balance or peace can be found.
Ms. Mancini added the HRC is different because they are appointed by the council and the HRC
is St. Louis Park, and this is our community. She stated this is a voluntary commission that is
hoping to make real change in the community.
Mayor Spano stated he is trying to get to the nature of the interaction of the council and the
commission. He stated the HRC is interested in more engagement and picking up the pace and
asked if this is correct. Ms. Mancini stated they have been able to do more work and move their
agenda forward through subcommittees. She added the summer of action committee has
helped as well.
Mayor Spano noted a concern of the former racial equity manager on city staff was about
moving too fast, rather than slowing down to dig deeper on issues and being more engaged.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
Ms. Mancini stated the HRC is concerned about the fierce urgency of now, and as much as she
appreciates the idea about not doing something, just to do something. She added the HRC was
stalled.
Mayor Spano stated last summer after the George Floyd murder, he received many emails from
residents and topics to work on. He stated he asked to come back to these conversations later
and noted he did not receive any emails again from anyone afterwards. He noted this would
have been a good place to have the HRC step in and help work on these issues, and it was a
missed opportunity.
Ms. Chismar stated summer of action will introduce partners to share their missions with the
city and provide volunteer opportunities for residents, as well as offer tools.
Councilmember Kraft noted there may be too many events scheduled, especially since no dates
have been set yet. Ms. Mancini stated the HRC is aware of this, and will only be able to do so
much, and are working on this.
Councilmember Dumalag added she has had several folks interested in Just Deeds and she
would hope the HRC keep this on their list of events.
Mayor Spano added he has spoken on the Just Deeds issue and is happy it will remain as a
priority on the HRC’s list.
Councilmember Rog stated the policing and race equity in community policing topics are
important to keep as a priority as well.
Mr. Gray asked the council to continue to provide their feedback, and validated Councilmember
Kraft’s concerns about the number of events planned.
2. Preliminary levy/budget discussion
Ms. Schmitt presented the report. She stated this will be a high-level overview of 2022 budget,
levy scenarios and discussion on direction on budget process. Ms. Schmitt noted the budget
timeline, with regular approval of the 2022 preliminary tax levies on September 20 and final
approval of the 2022 budget and final property tax levies on December 20, 2021.
Ms. Schmitt noted the 2022 projection of market value increase at 4.68%. She noted all union
contracts are up for negotiation this year, ending in December of 2021. She also added
consideration on potential COVID impacts will be reviewed.
Ms. Schmitt noted capital project challenges including cost to fund capital plan, increasing
maintenance costs, and changing infrastructure, and exploring additional revenue sources. She
noted 2022 debt realities, including the Dakota Bridge project.
Councilmember Harris asked if there are any predictions beyond five years and wondered if
there are any projections on Connect the Park in 5 years. Ms. Schmitt stated yes, she has made
future projections, and noted the next 5 years will have increases, but added there will be
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 7
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
opportunity to take on debt without increases to the levy and debt will start to fall off later as
well.
Councilmember Harris stated as she represents many who have financial hardships, she feels
responsible to mitigate increased financial hardships, therefore she feels scaling down Connect
the Park may be in order. She added the city’s goals on climate action are very large, so levies
can be lower on an annual basis and continue investing in climate action plan efforts.
Councilmember Rog noted COVID impacts and asked about federal monies that might be
coming to help the city on recovery. Ms. Schmitt stated the city is supposed to get recovery
money and she is working on this currently. She stated it could mitigate revenue losses, but she
does not have specifics yet.
Councilmember Rog stated the comprehensive plan is prioritizing walking, biking, mass transit
and vehicles in that order. She noted road repair is a priority but asked if that aligns with
investments for community dollars. She stated she would like to discuss how much is being
invested in road repairs, and possibly there could be delays there, especially since we have
committed to alternate modes of transportation. She suggested redirecting franchise fees
toward Connect the Park or toward areas that do not prioritize roads. She added she is open to
the idea of sales tax to finance infrastructure projects.
Councilmember Mohamed stated on local sales tax she is now supportive of this, especially
with challenges coming in 2022.
Councilmember Kraft stated he is interested in reprioritization conversations as well. He asked
about the market increase slide and if that is total market value or if the market value captured
by TIF is shown. Ms. Schmitt stated no, it does not include tax capacity. Councilmember Kraft
stated he would be interested in seeing more information about the city’s TIF program over the
next 10 years, to get a sense of how it changes over time, to look at longer term debt scenarios.
Councilmember Kraft noted on increasing maintenance costs and asked if productively
efficiency stays the same. Ms. Schmitt stated each area builds their budget and in certain areas
efficiencies are built in, but it depends on the department. Mr. Harmening added for
improvements, staff contracts this out and some efficiencies can be built in if the contract
allows for it. Ms. Walsh stated they do get price quotes, and everything is priced out each year,
and it is more efficient to hire contracted services at this time.
Councilmember Kraft stated capital is driving the levy increase according to Ms. Schmitt’s
presentation. He asked if this is the debt levy driving it. Ms. Schmitt stated yes and also the new
levy for sidewalk and trail which pays for gap sidewalks.
Councilmember Kraft asked what an EDA levy would be used for. Ms. Schmitt stated it could be
used for the climate investment fund, adding this would be an additional revenue source
coming.
Councilmember Kraft stated on local option sales tax, he would be interested in possibilities of
this. He asked if there are any tools to address perceived inequity levies, such as hitting a
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 8
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
certain property owner or renter in inequitable ways. Mr. Harmening stated property taxes are
based on a formula from the state of MN and depends on the market and what is selling. He
noted there are a variety of factors that are involved, adding the state has tools in place. Ms.
Schmitt added the state does offer some property tax refund programs.
Councilmember Kraft stated he wants to see the city have a modest amount added to the
climate investment fund and should be adding here on an annual basis and then increase
ongoing. He liked the idea of using the EDA levy for this and added he does not want to push
out Connect the Park any longer and would be interested in looking at trade-offs such as those
that Councilmember Rog mentioned.
Councilmember Brausen stated he is in favor of scenario b – current long-term plan. He stated
the sidewalk gaps should be filled in, and also, he is fine with investigating the sales tax, but
doesn’t see the current legislature doing anything on that this year or next year, especially with
possible redistricting. He agreed with an EDA levy on climate action, but stated a tax is still a tax
and will impact residents, however folks have been responsive for the most part. He does have
concerns about Cedar Lake Road not being maintained and he is concerned about moving that
out further, adding that electric cars are currently not a reality and infrastructure will need to
continue to be improved.
Councilmember Dumalag stated she likes the idea of the EDA levy for climate action and is
interested in delaying some of Connect the Park and MSA but would want to know what it looks
like if they do not stick with the schedule. She stated she is open to look at the local sales
option tax as well and learning more about this.
Mayor Spano asked Mr. Harmening for a synopsis about local sales tax option. Mr. Harmening
gave specifics, noting the legislature has a deadline every year to approve this. Ms. Solano
stated it would be helpful to have the council’s decision in advance in order to meet the state’s
timeline.
Mayor Spano asked about the levy scenarios presented and if these were increases over last
year. Ms. Schmitt stated yes, it would be an increase over last year. Mayor Spano stated he is
not interested in continuing to defer Connect the Park or pushing it back any further. He added
in shifting franchise fees he would need to better understand implications of that. He asked for
more details on the potential EDA levy for climate action funding. Ms. Schmitt stated this would
be a new funding source as there is no EDA levy at this time.
Mayor Spano asked what the limits are around EDA levies. Mr. Harmening stated there are
limits, and can be used for loans, grants, items that promote business or jobs, and incenting
businesses for energy uses.
Mayor Spano asked when the council can get more feedback to her. Ms. Schmitt stated
emailing her is fine, so she can get this information to the directors as they build their budgets.
Mr. Harmening stated he understands the council needs more time to consider this, and that
there is interest in an EDA levy and the council wants more information. He stated the more
input council gives staff in the next week, staff can include in their response at the June 14
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 9
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
meeting. Mr. Harmening added the council seems to be interested in more detail on the local
sales tax option, adding staff can provide background information to council as well.
Councilmember Harris asked if the park improvement fund is associated with development
projects. Mr. Harmening stated yes, noting it is funded with a levy and also park dedication
fees. He stated this is used for park capital projects.
Councilmember Harris asked if this can be used for walking trails or sidewalks. Mr. Harmening
stated the levy in the park improvement fund can be used for anything and if council wanted to
shift this to something else one year, they can. However, park dedication fees must be used for
park and trail improvements.
Councilmember Harris asked if in future reports that levy can be added in as a line item so it can
show flexibility. She also asked if the federal Care Funds can be used for park operations and
use fund dollars for Connect the Park. Mr. Harmening stated yes, adding there is very little
guidance on what the federal dollars can be used for, and the city is not yet aware of the
amount they will be receiving yet. He added it is possible those dollars can help with levies, this
or next year, but that is not known yet.
Councilmember Harris added the environmental cost for additional construction and carbon
output for new developments should also be discussed by council, because if more was known
about this, the council may decide not to do a certain project. She added instead of building
new, if the city could use on street facilities and remove an aisle of parking on streets, that
might be more useful. Mr. Harmening stated ultimately that is a council decision on what type
of facility they want.
Councilmember Kraft stated the levy increase needs to be taken in the context of the city’s tax
base growth and if the tax base is growing significantly then the city may do a levy increase that
is a tax decrease for all, and that is why he wants to see the profile over time.
Councilmember Rog asked about the future scenario with debt coming off assumes no new
debt is coming on. Ms. Schmitt stated there will be new debt, but in 2026 two large projects
debt will end, and new projects should not be as large.
Mayor Spano stated councilmembers will provide additional feedback to Ms. Schmitt as needed
by next Wednesday.
3. Future study session agenda planning and prioritization
Mayor Spano commented on a potential project on Excelsior Boulevard and parking guidelines
in the area. He and Councilmember Kraft are looking at making a corridor vibrant and walkable,
but some of the guidance given to staff in the past might run contradictory to this. Mayor
Spano stated this would be worth a conversation at a future study session.
Councilmember Brausen suggested that discussion be added to other parking areas as well.
Mayor Spano stated this is different in that it might become a bigger discussion on vital
corridors, and guidance given to staff in past.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 10
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
Councilmember Dumalag stated she would be less inclined to look at this unless it were more
looking at a city policy overall.
Councilmember Harris stated on this topic, she prefers a commission look at this and come back
to advise council. Mr. Harmening stated the planning commission can look into this and present
recommendations. He suggested that staff discuss with the council first, however.
Ms. Solano stated the council will be in person at the May 17 meeting. The special study session
will follow and will allow the public to attend, and the community room will be set up for
overflow. She stated all the safety protocols are set up for council and will be adjusted as
changes are made. She added the technology will also be set for those wanting to attend
virtually, and open meeting laws are being reviewed as well.
Councilmember Rog stated she wants to discuss continuing to provide study session meetings
for the public to view similar to how the council meetings are shown.
Ms. Solano stated we are currently broadcasting all study sessions and providing the link on the
website as well. She stated the council will need to discuss if they want to continue with live
broadcasts of the study sessions.
Mayor Spano stated he believes the study sessions should be broadcast live to the public. Mr.
Harmening stated the first regular study session on June 14 can be a live broadcast. The council
agreed to this. Mr. Harmening stated he will work with ParkTV staff on how this will work.
Councilmember Brausen stated he is not concerned about partitions between councilmembers.
Mr. Harmening stated the partitions are all set up but at the May 17 meeting, councilmembers
will be seated similar to a study session set-up.
Councilmember Rog asked about future discussion related to community and neighborhood
sidewalk designations combined with Connect the Park, noting she doesn’t think this has
happened yet and asked how this will be handled.
Councilmember Rog referenced the easy access to nature report and stated she wants to
ensure equity is happening here and someone is reaching out to the school district. She also
noted the ESC report which discusses their looking into idling. She stated this is a good example
of how city commissions can be utilized to research items and report back to council.
Councilmember Dumalag noted the inclusionary housing proposed amendments and asked if
co-ops should be included as a sales option, knowing Aldersgate will not be happening, related
to the payment that goes into the fund. Mr. Harmening stated he will discuss this with staff.
Councilmember Kraft asked what happened with Aldersgate. Mr. Harmening noted it is related
to inclusionary housing funds and requires a payment-in-lieu for affordable housing and that
amount was a concern of the developer and they decided to step away. He added there is
another developer interested in that property as an affordable site, so the policy objective is
being met.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 11
Title: Study session minutes of May 10, 2021
Councilmember Rog stated she was happy to see the report on larger apartment units and
stated for clarity it seems a three-bedroom apartment should be called family size units, vs.
larger family units, and would mirror what other cities do as well.
The meeting adjourned at 10:11p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
4 Inclusionary housing policy proposed amendments
5. Perspective update
6. Environment and Sustainability Commission (ESC) Environmental Justice report
7. Completion of Westwood Hills Nature Center project
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Minutes: 3b
Unofficial minutes
City council study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
May 24, 2021
The meeting convened at 6:39 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia
Mohamed, and Margaret Rog
Councilmembers absent: Lynette Dumalag
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Police Chief Harcey, Transportation Engineer (Mr.
Manibog), Interim Administrative Services Officer (Ms. Solano)
Guests: none
1. Citywide speed limit evaluation update
Mr. Manibog presented the report. He noted updates to speed limit recommendations,
pointing out lowering speed limits can reduce high-rate speeders and overall crashes.
Councilmember Harris stated she has been collecting feedback from residents and noted the
comments gathered show that people think about this in many ways. She noted feedback
included requests for more enforcement, as well as observations that cars are speeding. She
added she discussed comments with the city’s mental health collaborative police
representative, noting that slower speeds create safer neighborhoods and reduce fatalities.
Councilmember Harris asked how this speed limit change would be enforced. Chief Harcey
stated the police department hears from residents about problem areas, then they do speed
limit testing, collect data, record speed collection, radar, determine if there is a speed problem,
and then do citations and build in enforcement. He noted these same problem-solving
techniques would be utilized even with lower speed limits within the city.
Councilmember Harris stated a resident had concerns about the proposed speed limit at 36th
Street and asked if it could be lowered. Mr. Manibog stated the recommendation there is to
lower from 30 to 25 miles per hour, given ongoing construction in that area.
Councilmember Harris also noted 36th Street is a wider road and people do drive faster. She
asked if a lower speed is proposed for that area. Mr. Manibog stated yes, changing conditions
can affect areas, and an engineering safety analysis can be done as well. Councilmember Harris
asked if 36th Street could be lowered to 25 miles per hour.
Councilmember Rog stated she supports lowering speed limits to lower fatalities. She stated
the city is lowering speed limits to eliminate fear and increase comfort on streets, adding she
has heard from residents about this issue consistently over time in support of lowering speed
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Title: Study session minutes of May 24, 2021
limits. She stated this will make streets more comfortable for pedestrians and bikers. She asked
where Golden Valley and Edina are on this change. Mr. Manibog stated Golden Valley is not
moving forward with any changes and Edina is still working on recommendations in ongoing
conversations with council.
Councilmember Rog asked about the impact of inconsistent speed limits across the Twin Cities.
Mr. Manibog stated it is currently so new, it has not been studied; however, the messaging is
consistent across all cities.
Councilmember Rog stated going 25 mph is very slow and it is a complete mind-set shift, which
reminds folks that others are using the street. She will support this, especially in her ward. She
stated earlier she recommended the Utica Avenue to 27th Street speed limit should be set at 20
mph and staff recommendation came back at 30 mph. She now would like to see this reduced
to 25 mph or lower, being there are many driveways, trail entries, and high-density residential.
She added this resembles a 25-mph street, but people currently go faster on that street. She
asked to hear further from staff on this. Mr. Manibog stated staff works to meet the
expectations of drivers and those living adjacent to the streets. He added 25 mph in this area
will not meet those expectations.
Councilmember Rog stated she would like 25 mph in this location as there are also two
pedestrian crosswalks there, and WAT PROM folks agree it should be slower speeds there. She
asked for an expedited change, especially with the pedestrian bridge there, adding she hopes
the council will agree with this recommendation.
Councilmember Kraft stated he read the data on this location, has walked the pedestrian
bridge, and agrees with working to get folks to drive slower there. He noted there might be a
temporary measure that could be added in the short term. He supports the lowering of speed
limits and asked if the city plans on getting more funds by issuing more citations. Chief Harcey
stated no, that is not the approach being taken with citations.
Councilmember Kraft stated he had a concern on the communication process and the postcard,
noting it seemed like a decision was already made so it was confusing to folks. He stated the
last study session packet noted the informed spectrum approach and asked if that is a norm for
council to use. Mr. Harmening stated that had been discussed in the past, but maybe not
recently. He stated this will be discussed further with council later in the summer, noting staff
recommended using this approach to base changes on reasoning and analysis to meet the
statutory requirement. He explained uniformity needs to be the norm with speed limits, as well
as continuity, stating that is why the informed approach is used.
Councilmember Kraft stated if staff had been clearer to ask for input, it may have gone over
better with residents. Mr. Harmening stated staff framed it with the “inform” approach based
on council’s direction to utilize the statutory requirement.
Councilmember Kraft stated he is supportive of this and views this as one part of an overall
strategy for roads. He asked if staff learned anything in this process on how speed limits will
change as it relates to how a street is designed. Mr. Manibog stated it is effective and changing
speed limits is another tool in the toolbox. Mr. Harmening stated traffic calming can tie into
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 3
Title: Study session minutes of May 24, 2021
speed limits as well, and an engineering concept. He stated when Louisiana Avenue is reviewed,
that will come into consideration.
Councilmember Mohamed referenced the postcard and stated the feeling from the council was
that the intention is to lower speed limits, but the postcard had to do more with messaging.
She added she loved the staff report as it was thoughtful and added there are concerns on
Utica Avenue about fast drivers. She is fine with lowering the speed there to 25 mph but asked
what would encourage folks to go 25 mph and whether traffic calming should be added on top
of the speed limit as well.
Councilmember Brausen stated he was fine with the postcard and the message that speeds will
be lowered. He stated the question is where will speeds be lowered and when, adding Cedar
Lake Road will be lowered to 30 mph from 35 mph. He stated this formalizes the existing
speeds most folks drive on these streets currently. He asked about the public process. Mr.
Harmening stated a public hearing is not proposed for this issue. Councilmember Brausen
stated if folks do want to discuss this at the meeting, he assumes they will be able to.
Councilmember Brausen stated he supports the speed limits proposed. He noted the Utica
Avenue issue also involved the entrance on Highway 100 and possibly the city could ask the
county to close the entrance there onto Highway 100, with safety considerations noted.
However, he noted that would inconvenience local residents and he would like to see more
study on this from staff. He noted the staff report was helpful and the traffic and enforcement
studies were very informative. He stated the city relies on voluntary compliance, on residents
and how they drive on the streets, noting most do comply.
Councilmember Brausen noted about half of the public comments, especially on Next Door,
were very negative or insulting towards council. He encouraged folks to respect the fact that
council is working to make streets safer in St. Louis Park, adding that no additional revenue will
be collected.
Councilmember Rog pointed out at Utica Avenue, speeds were lower in May 2019 and April
2020. She asked if enforcement was happening during that time. Chief Harcey stated he did not
know if speed enforcement was going on during that time, although the police do enforce at
various times. Mr. Manibog added speed boards were used there during those timeframes.
Councilmember Rog stated the speed limit here should be lowered and safety is the main
concern. She noted temporary solutions may be more effective than lower speed limits at this
time. Mr. Harmening stated a permanent speed board could be placed there and be solar
operated. He added possibly adding cones and enforcement as it represents a hot spot for
traffic education.
Mr. Manibog pointed out that anything added closer to that Highway 100 entrance would need
to be reviewed by MnDOT.
Councilmember Kraft stated reducing speed limits also enforces the outliers and if this prevents
one death, it will be worth it, it fits the city’s priorities, and makes sense.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 4
Title: Study session minutes of May 24, 2021
Councilmember Harris asked how speed boards might get added to other streets permanently,
at Louisiana Avenue between Minnetonka Boulevard and 33rd Street. Chief Harcey stated this is
something that could be reviewed, adding he would speak with engineering about permanent
speed boards. Mr. Harmening stated this would be useful as another traffic education
component as well.
Councilmember Harris noted on Cedar Lake Road, there is a change of speed limits and it shifts
from 30 mph to 25 mph and back again to 30 mph. She asked why that is. Mr. Harmening
stated when looked at closely, that segment seemed to work best at 25 mph.
Councilmember Harris asked if that would be confusing to drivers. Mr. Manibog explained the
national guidance states changes in speed limits should only be changed at a minimum of one-
half mile, and staff felt as part of the analysis, this was acceptable.
Councilmember Harris asked if Hennepin County is looking to reduce any speed limits. Mr.
Manibog stated he is not aware of any at this time and any reductions to county road speed
limits would need to be approved by MnDOT. Councilmember Harris asked what the current
speed limit is on Minnetonka Boulevard. Mr. Manibog stated it is 35 mph.
Councilmember Harris asked if there were any indication folks would move to the faster speed
limit roads. Mr. Manibog stated there is nothing indicating this in the traffic analysis.
Councilmember Harris stated she supports the recommendations of staff on the speed limit
recommendations.
Mayor Spano thanked staff for the report. He stated he is probably the least supportive of the
speed limit changes. He asked about the physical enforcement comment and if that means
having an officer issuing citations. He also asked if electronic cameras are used to give citations
at traffic stops in the city. Chief Harcey stated no citations are allowed by electronic means by
state law currently.
Mayor Spano asked then if educational information could be sent to folks that may be driving
over the speed limit or not driving safely. He would like to see what this might look like to
educate drivers. He also asked if signs would all be updated within the project and where
speeds change within streets. Mr. Manibog stated yes.
Mayor Spano stated these changes seem to deter the fastest drivers. He asked what the net
result has been on traffic fatalities and safety in other cities. Mr. Manibog stated Seattle saw a
decrease in injury crashes. Mayor Spano asked to see this data and if there is any from
Minneapolis as well. He added he would like to see more data on cities that are more
comparable to St. Louis Park.
Mayor Spano stated most of the injuries are happening at intersections and asked if there is
data on this that could be reviewed.
Mayor Spano asked how staff applied an equity view to the policy and what discussions staff
had. Mr. Manibog stated the data showed in white neighborhoods, there is a tendency to drive
slower, due to the existing system as it is, and other things that are not known yet. Also, in the
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 5
Title: Study session minutes of May 24, 2021
1970s and 1980s there were whiter and wealthier neighborhoods, and they were more
successful in petitioning for lower speed limits. He added prioritizing where people live was
another criterion that was reviewed.
Mayor Spano noted he is not comfortable saying that streets are for walkers too and is ready to
discuss that further. He stated streets are for biking, but he wants to be clear that folks
understand we are not encouraging them to walk in the street.
Councilmember Rog stated in the same way we make rules for driving, the reality is that people
are walking in the streets because there are no other options and slower speeds will help with
safety for walkers. Councilmember Rog noted the “20 is Plenty” as a slogan is fine but does the
city want to use the same slogan that Minneapolis uses.
Councilmember Brausen added the right-of-way are for folks walking, biking, and driving
vehicles. He added most streets in St. Louis Park do not have sidewalks and the reality is that
the right-of-way is for all three types of transportation modes.
Councilmember Kraft asked when speed data is collected, how is it collected, from speed
boards or in other ways. Mr. Manibog stated it was collected with speed boards and video data,
as well as through construction projects.
It was the consensus of the council to support the speed limit changes proposed by council and
bring the first reading of the ordinance to the June 7, 2021 meeting.
Mr. Harmening stated the Utica Avenue topic can be discussed at the June 7, 2021 meeting as
well as several other items the council wished to review.
2. Semi-trailer parking update
Councilmember Rog noted that semi-trailer parking on CSAH 25 is causing concern according to
businesses and residents in the area. She stated this is the time to do something about this and
an ordinance can be created, and restrictions posted. She proposed asking staff to initiate this
process as soon as possible and asked the council for their support.
Mr. Harmening stated currently there is nothing in city codes about semi-trailer parking, but it
is becoming more of an issue in the community and more complaints are coming in from
residents. He stated an ordinance could be created and once that is in place, the council or a
resident could initiate the adoption of this ordinance in a specific location. Mr. Harmening
noted if the city moves semi-trailers from one area, they may go to another area and park, so
that is a concern. Mr. Harmening stated the ordinance would pertain to the whole city – like a
“no parking” ordinance. The council would then approve the ordinance for a specific location.
Councilmember Harris stated some residents are employed as truck drivers and asked if this
would be considered and then provide outreach. Mr. Harmening stated he is not sure the issue
can be resolved for the trucking community, but the city can work on this issue as it affects
neighborhoods. Mayor Spano added there are trucking apps that show truckers where to park.
Councilmember Brausen stated he is supportive of this.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 6
Title: Study session minutes of May 24, 2021
Councilmember Kraft stated he did go to the area in the winter and saw trucks idling in the area
for days. He stated this stretch is not set up for truck parking and there are other more
appropriate areas for this. He is supportive of the ordinance and no truck parking on CSAH 25.
It was the consensus of the council to support creation of an ordinance to address this issue.
3. Future study session agenda planning and prioritization
It was noted the June 7, 2021 meeting will include the speed ordinance and the city manager
selection process.
Councilmember Harris referenced items in progress, pointing out the issues of housing policy
and family-sized units. She asked if there has been any information from developers yet on that
topic and if any outreach or input has been gathered. Mr. Harmening stated he would find out
and get back to council.
Councilmember Kraft asked about noise and fireworks and noted a discussion is needed before
July 4th to follow through on illegal fireworks going off late at night, noise problems for animals
and folks with PTSD -- what can be done about this, and education. Mr. Harmening stated there
are already laws on the books about illegal use of fireworks, but the problem is seeing it as it is
happening. He stated staff could come to council with a robust communications and outreach
plan. He added the law is there, but it is hard to enforce.
Councilmember Kraft agreed with a communication plan and suggested adding there will be
enforcement. Chief Harcey stated Fire Chief Koering is also very against fireworks and safety
issues. He stated the police do their best to enforce this, but it does have obstacles.
Councilmember Rog added pulling in neighborhood associations and block captains could help.
Mr. Harmening stated staff will discuss this and bring it back to council at the next meeting.
Councilmember Harris agreed it would be helpful to communicate enforcement and the
dangers and safety measures of illegal fireworks.
Councilmember Rog added regrouping with the HRC and further discussion should also be
added for an agenda in the near future. Ms. Solano confirmed the HRC will be coming back with
an ordinance recommendation.
Councilmember Rog noted the Westwood Hills Nature Center access fund is now available so a
conversation with the schools is now in order. She added this would be a good time to have a
conversation with the school board.
Mr. Harmening stated he is very supportive of an intense on-boarding process for the new city
manager, and the consultant has been asked to put together an on-boarding process so more
will be communicated to the council on this.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3b) Page 7
Title: Study session minutes of May 24, 2021
Councilmember Mohamed asked about the Pathways to Homeownership program and who is
presenting that. Mr. Harmening stated it will be housing staff presenting.
Mayor Spano stated he is excited the art projects are moving forward with the SWLRT.
Councilmember Harris noted the owners of Wok in the Park have recently purchased the
building next door as well, so the auto repair service will remain. She also noted another taco
restaurant and a hair salon will be added soon at Texa-tonka.
Mayor Spano noted tomorrow is the one-year anniversary of the murder of George Floyd. He
asked what the council’s interest is in making a comment as a body or if each will make their
own comment on social media.
Councilmember Harris is in favor of a statement and would like it to convey impact as to what
actions the city has taken related to racial equity.
Ms. Solano stated the HRC is working with staff on releasing a communication tomorrow and
inviting residents to the memorial walk event.
Councilmember Kraft asked if the announcement can be presented to council now and what
the target audience is of the communication. Ms. Solano presented the communication from
HRC to the council. She stated the intent is to acknowledge and encourage people to attend the
event and participate in community action.
Councilmember Mohamed stated she agrees the HRC statement is sufficient communication
and that each councilmember should put their own statement on social media.
Councilmember Brausen stated he would like to include some acknowledgement that the city
has spent significant time examining the role of police in the community and continues to
address race and equity work.
Councilmember Rog approved of the HRC statement also, marking the anniversary, and to
encourage attending the city event.
The meeting adjourned at 9:05 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
4 Update on SWLRT Community Works Places art initiative
5. April 2021 monthly financial report
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Minutes: 3c
Unofficial minutes
City council special study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
June 15, 2021
The meeting convened at 3:00 p.m. in the Community Room at City Hall.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris,
Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog
Councilmembers absent: none
Staff present: Deputy City Manager/Operations & Recreation Director (Ms. Walsh) and Interim
Human Resources Officer (Ms. Timpone)
Guests: GovHR Executive Search Consultant (Ms. Stevens), City Manager Finalist Candidate (Ms.
Keller)
1. Second Interview
Council conducted a second interview with Ms. Keller, who provided additional information
about her experience and strengths as a leader, ability to lead during a crisis, relationship
building skills with elected officials, and other information needed to make a hiring decision.
Ms. Keller was given an opportunity to ask questions of council as well.
Council then had a brief discussion about Ms. Keller’s qualifications for the position and
indicated they were looking forward to seeing the other finalist candidates later in the week
before making a hiring decision.
The meeting adjourned at 4:29 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Minutes: 3d
Unofficial minutes
City council special study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
June 17, 2021
The meeting convened at 3:00 p.m. in the Community Room at City Hall.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris,
Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog
Councilmembers absent: none
Staff present: Deputy City Manager/Operations & Recreation Director (Ms. Walsh) and Interim
Human Resources Officer (Ms. Timpone)
Guests: GovHR Executive Search Consultant (Ms. Stevens), City Manager Finalist Candidates
(Ms. Olson and Mr. Dahl)
1. Second Interviews
Council conducted a second interview with Ms. Olson, who provided additional information
about her experience and strengths as a leader, ability to lead during a crisis, relationship
building skills with elected officials, and other information needed to make a hiring decision.
Ms. Olson was given an opportunity to ask questions of council as well.
Council conducted a second interview with Mr. Dahl covering the same topics.
Council then had a brief discussion about all three finalists, noting that all candidates were well
qualified and came very prepared for the second interview. Council agreed that the second
round of interviews was helpful in providing clarity and indicated that they would be able to
decide and extend an offer to one of the candidates. Mayor Spano noted that he likes to be
deliberate about big decisions and suggested that a final decision be tabled until the special
study session on June 21. At that time, council will identify their top candidate and direct staff
to extend a conditional offer of employment.
The meeting adjourned at 5:58 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Minutes: 3e
Unofficial minutes
City council special study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
June 21, 2021
The meeting convened at 5:35 p.m. in the Community Room at City Hall.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris,
Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog
Councilmembers absent: none
Staff present: Interim Human Resources Officer (Ms. Timpone)
Guests: GovHR Executive Search Consultant (Ms. Stevens)
1. Discussion
Ms. Stevens provided a high-level overview of the city manager process thus far:
• GovHR collected data from staff, council and stakeholders and developed a profile for
the city manager vacancy.
• Over 70 applications were received and pre-screened by GovHR.
• 13 candidates were identified for further review by council
• Ms. Stevens and Ms. Davis from GovHR presented seven tier one candidates for council
consideration.
• Council selected three finalists.
• Finalists interviewed on June 4, 2021 with a panel of staff, a panel of community
stakeholders, and participated in a city tour.
• Finalists interviewed on June 5 with council.
• Council conducted a second round of interviews with finalists the week of June 14.
Council provided unanimous consensus that their top candidate after this thorough process was
Kimberly R. Keller, director of regulatory services for the City of Minneapolis, and directed staff
to extend an employment offer and negotiate terms and conditions of an employment
agreement. Council also noted that the other finalists Mr. Dahl and Ms. Olson were highly
qualified and impressive throughout the process and that it was a difficult decision.
Council requested that staff prepare a detailed and intentional onboarding process for the new
city manager. Council requested contact info for each of the finalists so they could reach out
and thank them for their time and participation.
The meeting adjourned at 5:46 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Minutes: 3f
Unofficial minutes
City council meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
June 7, 2021
1. Call to order
Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
1a. Pledge of allegiance
1b. Roll call
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris,
Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog
Councilmembers absent: none
Staff present: Deputy City Manager (Ms. Walsh), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Building and
Energy Director (Mr. Hoffman), Director of Community Development (Ms. Barton), Principal
Planner (Ms. McMonigal), Transportation Engineer (Mr. Manibog), Senior Planner (Ms.
Monson), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Communications Manager (Ms.
Smith), Interim Administrative Services Officer (Ms. Solano)
Guests: none
2. Presentations
2a. Recognition of Principal Planner Meg McMonigal’s years of service
Staff and council commended Ms. McMonigal for her years of service over the past 2
decades, noting her leadership including work on visioning processes, comprehensive
plan updates, race equity work, SWLRT, and many more projects. They thanked Ms.
McMonigal for her many years of service in many areas of the city.
Ms. McMonigal thanked the council and her colleagues for their comments, adding
working for the city has been great. She appreciated many council members over the
years coming together to make decisions, and staff who has also worked very hard for
the community. She stated she feels lucky to have been a part of St. Louis Park.
2b. Recognition of donations
It was noted the St. Louis Park American Legion donated $3,000 to purchase three
BolaWraps to be evaluated in the field as less-than-lethal use tool for a force option.
2c. Sherrill Mozey Day proclamation
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 2
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
On behalf of the city council and city, Mayor Spano read a proclamation declaring June
6, 2021, as Sherrill Mozey Day in St. Louis Park.
3. Approval of minutes
3a. City council meeting minutes of April 19, 2021
Councilmember Rog noted on page 1 it should read, “Councilmember Rog noted that
Hennepin County’s 2020 Levy was 0% and there may be more needs the city has to fill
because of that. She also asked about a status update on federal Cares Funds for the
city.”
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Dumalag, to
approve the city council meeting minutes of April 19, 2021, as amended.
The motion passed 7-0.
3b. Special study session minutes of April 19, 2021
It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
the special study session minutes of April 19, 2021, as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
3c. Closed executive session meeting minutes of April 23, 2021
It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Mohamed, to
approve the closed executive session meeting minutes of April 23, 2021, as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
3d. LBAE meeting minutes of April 26, 2021
It was moved by Councilmember Kraft, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
the LBAE meeting minutes of April 26, 2021, as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
3e. Study session meeting minutes of April 26, 2021
Councilmember Kraft noted the following corrections on the bottom of page 6 and top
of page 7, it should read, “He stated Edina is running out of properties and he fears
there could also be more teardowns in St. Louis Park. He stated he wants council to
consider how the city will look over time.
He suggested the broad goals be to have significantly more single-family homes that are
more significantly affordable in the city and prevent and epidemic of teardowns that are
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 3
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
replaced by McMansion homes, to allow for St. Louis Park families to grow into their
homes and stay in them.”
It was moved by Councilmember Mohamed, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to
approve the study session meeting minutes of April 26, 2021, as revised.
The motion passed 7-0.
3f. City council meeting minutes of May 3, 2021
It was moved by Councilmember Harris, seconded by Councilmember Mohamed, to
approve the city council meeting minutes of May 3, 2021, as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
4. Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar
4a. Accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of April 24 through May
28, 2021.
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 21-056 approving acceptance of $3,000 to be used to
purchase three BolaWraps to be evaluated in the field as a less-than-lethal use of
force option.
4c. Designate Thomas and Sons Construction the lowest responsible bidder and
authorize a contract with the firm in the amount of $1,132,245.06 for Belt Line
SWLRT pedestrian improvements (4022-2000).
4d. Approve the amended inclusionary housing policy to require the inclusion of
family size units (three bedrooms or larger) in developments with 50 or more
units, to clarify language related to the provision of on-site vehicle parking for
affordable units, and to add a definition for homeownership. (Moved to 8e).
4e. Approve Amendment No. 2 to City Agreement No. 20-17, between the city and
T-Mobile Central LLC, for communication antennas on the city’s water tower at
5100 Park Glen Road (Site no. A1P0022A).
4f. Approve a temporary extension of the licensed premises for one-day events at
Copperwing Distillery, located at 6409 Cambridge Street
4g. Adopt Resolution No. 21-057 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of
the sewer service line at 2840 Florida Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D.
08-117-21-44-0066.
4h. Approve amendment to the on-sale intoxicating liquor license for Philips
Investment Co. dba Park Tavern located at 3401 Louisiana Ave. S.
4i. Approve for filing planning commission minutes of April 7, 2021.
4j. Approve for filing planning commission minutes of May 5, 2021.
Councilmember Rog requested that consent calendar item 4d be removed and placed
on the regular agenda as item 8e.
It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
the agenda and items listed on the consent calendar as amended and to move consent
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 4
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
calendar item 4d to the regular agenda as item 8e; and to waive reading of all
resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Boards and commissions
5a. Appointment of representatives to board and commissions
Mayor Spano noted the original slate of candidates has one correction that Saiko is
unable to serve and Katie Turnbull will take her place.
Councilmember Kraft stated he was on the interview panel for two of these groups and
noted it was difficult to make a decision, as there were a lot of great applicants. He also
stated he would like to see the commissions come up with additional outlets where
people not selected for commissions can be involved through committees or sub-
committees.
Councilmember Brausen stated there are additional opportunities for those who were
not selected for boards or commissions to serve on other sub-committees and projects
within the city.
Mayor Spano agreed with these comments and asked folks to apply again next year for
open positions.
It was moved by Councilmember Harris, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to
appoint representatives to the boards and commissions as listed in exhibit A.
The motion passed 7-0.
6. Public hearings - none
7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – none
8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions, and discussion items
8a. Costco parking lot expansion – Park Place Plaza. Resolution No. 21-058 and
Resolution No. 21-059
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report.
Councilmember Kraft asked if there were advantages to a pond versus underground
storm storage. Mr. Morrison stated the benefit of an open water pond is aesthetics. This
application proposes to move the water storage and treatment underground. The
project will improve water treatment and containment by bring it up to today’s city and
watershed standards.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 5
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
Councilmember Kraft thanked past councils for their decisions on electric vehicle
charging stations, noting that there are several proposed here.
Tom Meyer, Engineer for Costco, was available for questions from the council.
Councilmember Kraft noted mulch volcanos on the parking lot and the tremendous
amounts of mulch, which he felt was a waste of resources and not healthy for the trees.
He asked if the landscaping company can make sure to pay attention to this issue.
Councilmember Kraft stated he was happy with the changes in this project and is
supportive of it.
Councilmember Brausen stated he also appreciated the change in traffic flow and is
supportive as well. He is happy for the improvements and enhanced water storage
management. He stated in the future, the idea of solar energy should be explored as
well as other climate change issues, before supporting PUDs.
Mayor Spano added he also will support this.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mohamed, to
adopt Resolution No. 21-058 and Resolution No. 21-059 approving a preliminary and
final plat of Park Place Plaza third addition and a planned unit development major
amendment for expanded parking.
The motion passed 7-0.
8b. Park Place Plaza planned unit development major amendment. Resolution No.
21-060
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to adopt
Resolution No. 21-060 approving the major amendment to the planned unit
development (PUD) to construct a 7,000-square-foot retail building.
The motion passed 7-0.
8c. Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950-36th St. W.
Ms. Monson presented the staff report.
Councilmember Harris asked about the greenhouse and special considerations.
Ms. Monson stated it was changed to allow for the greenhouse as a principle use versus
an accessory use.
Councilmember Dumalag asked if the change and cleanup being done now is more
appropriate than if the parcel is replatted and then a text amendment is completed.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 6
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
Ms. Monson stated staff felt if was cleaner and smoother to do it this way for the zoning
of the site.
It was moved by Councilmember Dumalag, seconded by Councilmember Mohamed, to
approve first reading of an ordinance amending section 36-268-PUD 9 of the zoning code
relating to previous development approvals at 5950-36th St. W. and to set the second
reading for June 21, 2021, and to approve first reading of an ordinance rezoning 5950-
36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed use and to set the second reading for June 21, 2021.
The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Rog absent).
8d. First reading of ordinance regarding speed limits
Mr. Manibog presented the staff report.
Councilmember Brausen stated he appreciated all the work staff has done on this issue.
He has heard from constituents and thinks this is a good proposal for the city. He noted
in Ward 4, east of Highway 100 and in the area from Zarthan Avenue to Louisiana
Avenue, it is proposed at 25 mph. He noted that during traffic times, it is usually 30 to
35 mph, and he has concerns about compliance if the speed limit is moved to 25 mph
here. He stated this will rely on voluntary compliance on Cedar Lake Road and for the
sake of consistency, he proposes making the speed limit 30 mph there, reduced from 35
mph from Highway 169 to Highway 100.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Harris to approve
first reading of an ordinance regarding speed limits and to set the second reading for
June 21, 2021 with an amendment to make Cedar Lake Rd. from Louisiana Ave to
Zarthan Ave 30 mph.
Mr. Mattick noted the speed limits are not being changed yet, and the ordinance only is
being changed at this time.
Mayor Spano clarified there will be an opportunity for council to discuss the speed limit
on this portion of Cedar Lake Road at a future time. Mr. Mattick stated that is correct.
Councilmember Brausen withdrew his motion to approve first reading of the ordinance.
Ms. Walsh stated staff can come back to council to further discuss speed limits and
studying conditions at a future time.
Councilmember Kraft stated he is very supportive of this approach for safety, values,
and the city’s overall strategy. He stated reducing speed limits reduces outliers and this
will make streets safer for bikes, pedestrians, and be an overall approach for getting
around without using cars. His concerns relate to how the 25 mph was decided upon. He
stated his experience is that no one travels 25 mph on Cedar Lake Road from Louisiana
Avenue to Zarthan Avenue and asked if it is possible to have an analysis approach that
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 7
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
leaves that at 30 mph. Mr. Manibog stated staff’s analysis is that the recommended
speed in this stretch is 25 mph.
Councilmember Kraft stated he has a hard time understanding the data on this and
asked about the level of detail staff looked at. Mr. Manibog noted there is variability,
and staff did take averages over many days, but the data is ultimately developed off the
averages.
Councilmember Harris stated her concerns on this stretch of Cedar Lake Road include
the design of the road, curves, elevation changes, and narrow road areas. She stated
those factors impact the way folks drive and when looking at speed as a tool and
working to make it safer for bikers and walkers, she encouraged adding slight curves in
the road so people drive slower. She also encouraged the use of road diets as well.
Councilmember Harris added she is in favor of this ordinance and would like to revisit
the data in the future as well.
Councilmember Rog stated she is not on that part of Cedar Lake Road as much as
others, adding the council has capacity to make changes in the future, if needed, so she
is comfortable supporting this ordinance. She received 40+ emails in support of
changing the city speed limit and feels there is strong community support. She noted
cars do need to go more slowly as it relates to pedestrians and bikers, who use streets
when sidewalks are not available.
Councilmember Dumalag added her constituents are also in support of lowering speed
limits and she is also in favor of the ordinance.
Councilmember Kraft stated he will support this and appreciates being able to come
back to this in the future. He added this was one of the top issues he has heard of from
constituents as well.
Councilmember Mohamed also will support the ordinance.
Mayor Spano thanked Mr. Manibog and staff for all the work going into this ordinance.
He trusts Mr. Manibog’s work here, noting the rigor he has applied shows. He added
doing this work in St. Louis Park is about us as a community, making St. Louis Park safer,
and relying on residents to do that. He stated he will support the ordinance.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to
approve the first reading of an ordinance regarding speed limits and to set the second
reading for June 21, 2021.
The motion passed 7-0.
8e. Amended inclusionary housing policy to require the inclusion of family size
units (3 bedrooms or larger) in developments with 50 or more units, to clarify
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 8
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
language related to the provision of on-site vehicle parking for affordable
units, and to add a definition for homeownership
Councilmember Rog stated she asked to move this item to the regular agenda to
highlight the changes made to the inclusionary housing policy and update anyone
interested in affordable housing in St. Louis Park.
Councilmember Rog noted that as a council they regularly allocate community resources
to support development both direct and indirect. She continued that in exchange for
these community resources, developers are required to provide the community with
benefits, sometimes these benefits clearly and directly benefit residents, but sometimes
they are more general.
Councilmember Rog stated there is a shortage of affordable housing in the city, noting
the inclusionary policy has provided, up until now, mostly studio and one-bedroom
affordable housing. With this policy change and the new 3-bedroom requirements,
there will be a direct benefit to low-income families in the community, which is quite
rare for this type of exchange between developers and city resources.
Councilmember Rog added she is pleased the city is looking out for low-income families
in new developments and noted this is an improvement, commending staff for their
work.
Councilmember Rog added the changes in parking fees that require developers to offer
reduced or free parking for low-income families is very positive and a great help.
Councilmember Kraft thanked Councilmember Rog for her work on this with staff, which
he stated, will make a difference.
It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to approve the
amended inclusionary housing policy to require the inclusion of family size units (3
bedrooms or larger) in developments with 50 or more units, to clarify language related
to the provision of on-site vehicle parking for affordable units, and to add a definition for
homeownership.
The motion passed 7-0.
9. Communications
Councilmember Brausen stated the George Floyd Memorial Walk was a marvelous, reflective,
and energizing event. He thanked the HRC for their work on this and noted Councilmember
Mohamed spoke as well.
Mayor Spano agreed it was a great event, and Mr. Floyd’s family appreciated the event and the
work of the HRC.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 3f) Page 9
Title: City council meeting minutes of June 7, 2021
Councilmember Kraft also thanked the HRC and the Friends of the Arts, adding it was an
incredible intersection of work.
Councilmember Mohamed stated she loved how youth voices were incorporated into the
event, and she loved the walk and art as well.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4a
Executive summary
Title: Approval of city disbursements
Recommended action: Motion to accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of
May 29 through June 25, 2021.
Policy consideration: Does the city council desire to approve city disbursements in accordance
with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter?
Summary: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the city council to
review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check
and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the city’s
charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: City disbursements
Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk
Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer
Approved by:, Tom Harmening, city manager
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
14,124.00A&B WELDING & CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
14,124.00
88.32ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A EQUIPMENT PARTS
88.32
450.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
450.00
1,763.50ADVANCED ENG & ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,421.75SEWER UTILITY G&A ENGINEERING SERVICES
4,185.25
1,086.00ADVANCED MASONRY RESTORATION INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS
1,086.00
295.00ADVANTAGE AUTO GLASS, INC.INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS
295.00
6.34ALABAMA LLC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
6.34
31.25Alexandra Mae Daniels BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
250.00A-LIST DENT REPAIR GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
250.00
1,500.00ALLIANCE BUILDERS STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL
1,500.00
313.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
313.00
8,365.81ALLSTREAMIT G & A TELEPHONE
8,365.81
642.39AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
29.97POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
196.70POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
848.99TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 2
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
99.96CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE
1,818.01
31.25AMBER COLLEEN SIMMONS BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
31.25Amelia Grace Voyen BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
600.00AMERICAN LEAK DETECTION AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE
600.00
223.70AMERICAN SOLUTIONS FOR BUSINESS POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
223.70
228.97ANDERSON WILLIAM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
228.97
52.00APPLIANCE CONNECTIONS, INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING
52.00
176.61ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
603.75TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
780.36
2,957.63ARCADIS US., INC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,957.63
11,850.00ASAP UNDERGROUND SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
11,850.00
1,489.93ASPEN LAWN SERVICE/SIPE'S ENTERPRISES IN WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,489.93
301.86ASPEN MILLS FIRE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS
301.86
AT YOUTH PROGRAMS LLC.TENNIS GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,918.00TENNISGENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,918.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 3
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
160.00ATOMIC RECYCLING PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
160.00WATER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
160.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
480.00
499.50AVR INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
499.50
5,530.44BACHMANSNATURAL RESOURCES G & A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
534.54NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
220.69REFORESTATIONLANDSCAPING MATERIALS
424.14-BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
5,861.53
4,896.00BAN-KOE COMPANIES, INC.FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES
4,896.00
2,025.00BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,025.00
230.00BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
100.00TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
330.00
83.85BATTERIES PLUS BULBS SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
83.85
348.42BELOW JORDAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
348.42
1,629.39BETHEL ELECTRIC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,128.00SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
3,757.39
238.05BIGHAM ERIC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
238.05
44,300.00BLACKSTONE CONTRACTORS, LLC.STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
44,300.00
4,185.31BLOOMINGTON CITY OF REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 4
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
4,185.31
79.78BOBBY & STEVE'S AUTO WORLD PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
490.10PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
569.88
383.85BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,177.14PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
690.93WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
102.36SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
204.72STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,559.00
121.87BONNER MOLLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
121.87
1,614.50BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,614.50
1,200.00BRAD'S LANDSCAPING LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,200.00
105.08BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
322.22PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
189.14WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
28.02SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
56.04STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
700.50
2,806.76BRINKMAN LAUREN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION
2,806.76
62.90BURNS STEPHANIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
62.90
615.89BUSINESS ESSENTIALS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
87.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
920.52PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,623.41
148.50CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 5
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
20,084.50ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES
2,854.50IT G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,740.96ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES
630.80SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
280.50WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
25,739.76
164.11CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES
164.11
2,432.18CANON FINANCIAL IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,432.18
4,166.00CARE RESOURCE CONNECTION FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4,166.00
696.00CARLSON PRINTING COMPANY POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
696.00
33.15CARR THOMAS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
33.15
1,851.35CDW GOVERNMENT INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,851.35
450.00CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
450.00
1,500.00CENTER FOR PURPOSEFUL LEADERSHIP HUMAN RESOURCES ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT
1,500.00
895.99CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A HEATING GAS
180.74FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS
1,672.96WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
145.41REILLY G & A HEATING GAS
269.96SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS
437.06PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS
3,602.12
12.75CENTRAL MCGOWAN CONCESSIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
12.75
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 6
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
10,960.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT OTHER RETIREMENT
10,960.00
314.62CENTURY LINK CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE
314.62
150.00CHEF MARSHALL O'BRIEN LLC FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING
150.00
31.25Chelsea Marie Hoppe BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
325.00CHRISTIANSEN KRISTEN PARK BUILDINGS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
325.00
31.25Christopher Stephen Anderson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
450.00CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
450.00
210.18CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
182.58FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
57.74REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
441.84AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
277.81VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,170.15
204.00CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION
42.09FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
840.00FINANCE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
618.60FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER
212.70POLICE G & A COMPUTER SUPPLIES
1,026.88POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
157.45POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE
51.89TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
3,153.61
20,787.65CIVICPLUS, LLC.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES
29,102.75EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 7
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
49,890.40
6,750.00CLEAR GOV INC FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
6,750.00
455.00COLE PAPERS FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
455.00
17,464.24COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES
17,464.24
164.31COLVIN DANA SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
164.31
119.79COMCASTFIRE OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
228.36CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
42.88OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
29.34REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
420.37
333.78COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
6,428.53WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
6,762.31
439.00CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
439.00
213.24COREMARKPUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A EQUIPMENT PARTS
213.24
17.48CREEKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
17.48
149.94CROWN RENTAL - BURNSVILLE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
149.94
3,440.15CUMMINS SALES AND SERVICE FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
3,440.15
18.54CUSTOM HOSE TECH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
18.54
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 8
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,762.50CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,025.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,325.00SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
367.50SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
192.50SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,672.50
326.97CUSTOM REFRIGERATION INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
326.97
346.00DALCO ENTERPRISES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
407.49FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
214.95FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
968.44
264.00DAMA METAL PRODUCTS, INC.FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES
264.00
6,740.00DAVIS MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, INC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
6,740.00
138.54DELEGARD TOOL CO PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
138.54
6.88DELONG KRISTIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
6.88
440.00DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
440.00
7,376.13DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
7,376.13
1,600.23DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
305.00PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,605.00SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,510.23
260.00DOERING RENEE PARK BUILDINGS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
260.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 9
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
493.56DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE
957.55COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
881.00SUSTAINABILITY G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
639.85STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,971.96
950.00DONNA, JAMES J SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
950.00
.35DR ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
77.25BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL
77.60
1,500.00DROTNING CHARLES ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
1,500.00
100.33DZURIK DOUGLAS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
100.33
171.65E. GOLDSTEIN SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
171.65
838.95ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES
838.95
50.00EGGLESTON SARA SEASON PASSES REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
50.00
675.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ESCROWS MSP REAL ESTATE - EDA
2,025.00ESCROWSKNOLLWOOD - INDIRECT SOURCE PR
1,050.00ESCROWSCSM TRAFFIC STUDY/PLANNING
2,850.00ESCROWSAT THE PARK APTS
1,800.00ESCROWSSEMBLE EXCAVATING
65.00FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,211.25WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,211.25SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,211.25SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,211.25STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13,310.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 10
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,660.50EMBEDDED SYSTEMS INC FIRE OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
1,660.50
1,293.65EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,293.65
5,768.72ENTERPRISE FM TRUST EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT
5,768.72
200.00EPIC EXPO ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
200.00
8.75ERICKA LYNETTE JOHNSON BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
8.75
40.10ERICKSON JACOB POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS
40.10
713.00ESRIIT G & A TRAINING
713.00
684.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
684.00
8,100.00ETHICAL LEADERS IN ACTION LLC FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING
8,100.00
225.00EVANS CHRIS GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
1,350.00EVERBRIDGE INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,350.00
1,750.00EXPERT TREE SERVICE TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
1,750.00
822.84FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
19.95VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
449.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
23.30PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,315.09
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 11
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
117.67FASTENAL COMPANY INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
117.67
158.30FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
158.30
5,268.75FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
960.82WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
5,268.75SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
11,498.32
16.60FERRELLGASGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
66.78REC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS
27.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A MOTOR FUELS
110.38
29.24FINN WILL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
29.24
651.00FIRE SAFETY USA INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
651.00
1,048.75FISCHER BROS LLC INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS
1,048.75
4,186.00FLAGSHIP RECREATION LLC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
4,186.00
15,000.00FLOOD SHANNON ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
2,500.00ESCROWSDEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC
17,500.00
192.40FOGARTY COLLEEN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
192.40
137.17FRANCOUAL JOANNE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
137.17
30.96FRATTALLONE'S HARDWARE WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 12
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
16.98SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
212.21REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
260.15
77,358.86FRIEDGES LANDSCAPING PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
77,358.86
408.60GEAR WASH LLC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
408.60
679.21GENERAL PARTS LLC REC CENTER BUILDING REPAIRS
679.21
4,828.00GERTENSPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
4,828.00
659.83GLEASON PRINTING SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER
659.83
150.00GOLDSMITH LAURIE PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
150.00
1,302.75GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
1,302.75
150.00GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONFINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
450.00FINANCE G & A TRAINING
600.00
17.56GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
31.60FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
132.77WIRING REPAIR OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
24.89WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
206.82
1,443.89GRANICUSGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES
10,103.42COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11,547.31
130.63GRAY DARIUS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
130.63
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 13
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
6,890.24GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
6,890.24
808.27GREEN ACRES SPRINKLER CO IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
808.27
4,940.81GS SYSTEMS, INC.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES
3,529.19WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
8,470.00
7,529.92GUARDIAN FLEET SUPPLY INSURANCE FUND G&A UNINSURED LOSS
7,529.92
1,670.71HACH CO WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,670.71
20.00HACKEY MICHAELA PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
20.00
400.00HALL MARY SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
400.00
235.00HAMILTON ADAM BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
235.00
1.00HAMMER & VISE RENOVATIONS BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
95.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING
96.00
30,080.66HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
656.53SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIES
10,126.82AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
40,864.01
459.00HEALTHPARTNERSHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT
234.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
676.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
131.00FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
276.00FIRE OPERATIONS HEALTH & WELLNESS
139.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 14
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
334.00ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
139.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
428.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
189.00SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
139.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
234.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
139.00REC CENTER SALARIES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
139.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
3,656.00
1,134.25HEDBERG SUPPLY STORM WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
1,134.25
60.00HENNEPIN COUNTY RESIDENT & REAL ESTATE ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
60.00
203.00HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES
3,338.80POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
6,200.09POLICE G & A JAIL/DETENTION SERVICES
2,602.30FIRE OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
18.00HIA ADMIN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
810.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
13,172.79
1,860.00HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE FIRE OPERATIONS HEALTH & WELLNESS
1,860.00
18.95HENSCHEL BENJAMIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
18.95
1,600.20HIRSHFIELD'S PAINT MFG INC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,600.20
1,032.00HOLM AUSTIN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION
1,032.00
28,212.00HOLY FAMILY CATHOLIC CHURCH ESCROWS GENERAL
28,212.00
775.09HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
28.84ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 15
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
7.96ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
889.36WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
79.94PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
39.96SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIES
65.79NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
99.74NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
13.96AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
68.96GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
2,069.60
15.82HOME DEPOT CREDIT SRVCS WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
15.82
1,000.00HOOTEN JIMMY SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,000.00
47.85HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
47.85
8,573.45-HYDRO-KLEAN SEWER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE
171,469.00SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
162,895.55
1,820.00I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNION DUES
1,820.00
395.00ICE SPORTS INDUSTRY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
395.00
383.55IDEAL SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
383.55
353.69INDELCOWATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
27.48PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
43.32IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
424.49
180.00INDEPENDENT BLACK DIRT CO PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
180.00PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
360.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 16
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
619.35INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
1,377.84GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
1,997.19
31.25IRYNA ARTSIKHOVICH BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
500.00ISHKOVA LILLYA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW
500.00
686.63I-STATE TRUCK CENTER GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
686.63
461.10J. H. LARSON CO.WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
1,264.17SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
1,725.27
1.46JERRY'S HARDWARE FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
24.64POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
28.04WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS
23.32PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
6.29WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
83.75
23.12JOHNSON CHASE SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
23.12
35.19JOHNSON LUKE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
35.19
295.80JOHNSTON TERRY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
295.80
30.00JUDE NICOLE PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
30.00
31.25Kasey Chad Vaughn BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
235.00KEGEL JESSICA BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
235.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 17
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
31.25Kelly Montague BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
158.80KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS MSP REAL ESTATE - EDA
1,218.00ESCROWSSEMBLE EXCAVATING
1,340.60ESCROWSPLACE
305.60ESCROWSBRIDGEWATER BNK / EXC MONTEREY
3,023.00
24.00KIDCREATE STUDIO ART GENERAL SUPPLIES
144.00ARTOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
168.00
66.19KLEINSASSER JANE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
66.19
1,815.90KRISS PREMIUM PRODUCTS INC REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,815.90
1,228.00KROOG, RACHAEL ADULT PROGRAMS PROGRAM REVENUE
1,300.00SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,528.00
38.66LARSON VANESSA HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
38.66
3.50LATITUDE 45 DESIGN AND RENOVATION BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
170.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING
173.50
3,806.78LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNION DUES
3,806.78
53.01LAWSON PRODUCTS INC GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
53.01
213.29LEACH THOMAS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
213.29
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 18
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
25.00LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES HUMAN RESOURCES TRAINING
25.00
250.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST P&C FINANCE G & A PUBLIC LIABILITY INSURANCE
250.00
51.64LEE-TO COLIN SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
51.64
79.63LEGACY RESTORATION LLC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING
79.63
720.00LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
720.00
1,152.50LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,152.50
.13LENZ-OLSON STEPHANIE SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
.13
8.75LEONID METELITSA BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
8.75
2,500.00LEXIPOL, LLC.FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,500.00
10.00LEY KELLY PRE-SCHOOL PROGRAMS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
10.00
1,701.25LHB INC ESCROWS KNOLLWOOD - INDIRECT SOURCE PR
1,701.25
300.90LIBERTY TIRE SERVICES LLC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
300.90
401.40LIFE SUPPORT INNOVATIONS FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
401.40
1,500.00LIGHT OF THE WORLD CHURCH STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL
1,500.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 19
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
175.27LIU MILTON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
175.27
6,226.73LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES
6,226.73
258.24LOFFLERIT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
258.24
2,154.00LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
2,154.00
41,790.00LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES
750.00CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
23,628.94TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
66,168.94
133.80LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
133.80
625.00LUCIS LUIS CARDONA SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
625.00
2,486.10MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
2,125.26SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
4,611.36
61.19MALINOWSKI ZACHARY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
61.19
21,234.21MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY OF GAINSVILLE, INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
21,234.21
1,990.00MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
1,990.00
61.45MARTINEZ THOMAS POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
61.45
111.89MCCHESNEY, CHARLIE SOLID WASTE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 20
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
68.00SOLID WASTE G&A MEETING EXPENSE
179.89
75.00MCLAIN VIRGINIA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
75.00
99.98MENARDSFACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
58.61PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
57.76ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
394.33WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
104.90WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
715.58
702.15MESSERLI & KRAMER EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS
702.15
2,166.86METHODIST HOSPITAL SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
2,166.86
13,503.75METRO BLOOMS STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
13,503.75
700.00METRO CONCRETE RAISING INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
700.00
2,460.15METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
388,094.20OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
390,554.35
600.00MHSRC/RANGE POLICE G & A TRAINING
600.00
21.97MICHIELS PIERRE SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
21.97
19.98MICRO CENTER TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT
19.98
6,890.00MIDWEST GROUNDCOVER PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,890.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 21
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
79.02MILLS-NOVOA AVELINO SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
79.02
50.38MINNEAPOLIS SIGNS BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING
50.38
978.29MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS
978.29
33,035.00MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
92.00WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
33,127.00
40.00MINNESOTA DEPT. OF HEALTH SPECIAL EVENTS LICENSES
40.00PLAYGROUNDSGENERAL SUPPLIES
80.00
972.75MINNESOTA NATIVE LANDSCAPES NATURAL RESOURCES G & A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS
972.75
55.00MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT
55.00
175.00MINNESOTA RURAL WATER ASSOC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES
125.00WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS
300.00
210.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
210.00
300.00MINVALCO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
300.00
1,760.00MOSS & BARNETT CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,760.00
235.00MR CUTTING EDGE REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE
235.00
82.79MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
82.79
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 22
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
404.89MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
404.89
200.00MVTL LABORATORIES REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
200.00
1,146.97NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
13.59FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
139.13WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
143.94NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,443.63
59.00NEO ELECTRICAL SOLUTIONS BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL
59.00
1,020.00NEW BOUNDARY TECHNOLOGIES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,020.00
92.02NORMAN BLAKE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
92.02
1,026.01NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
476.40PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
1,502.41
30.89NORTH COUNTRY HOLDINGS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
30.89
55,980.00NORTH METRO COMPANIES CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
55,980.00
113.40NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN GENERAL SUPPLIES
113.40
451.75NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
451.75
NORTHERN TOOL & EQUIPMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
64.99GENERAL REPAIR SMALL TOOLS
64.99
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 23
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
74.97NORTHERN TOOL AND EQUIPMENT GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES
74.97
380.30NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
380.30
136.00NOVAK ANDREA ART REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
136.00
247.00NYABICHA GILBERT BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING
247.00
632.30OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
632.30
20.00ODDEN MICHELLE PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
20.00
78.70OFFICE DEPOT ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
96.55ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
29.98HUMAN RESOURCES OFFICE SUPPLIES
122.32COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
217.04COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
79.46POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
268.37BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
64.94PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
70.17ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
198.34ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES
59.49ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,285.36
228.00ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,381.00FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
110.00OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
60.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,779.00
5.86O'REILLY FIRST CALL GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
5.86
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 24
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
710.45ORIGINAL WATERMEN, INC.AQUATIC PARK G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
710.45
702.86OVERHEAD DOOR CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
702.86
4,250.00OVERLAY CONSULTING SUSTAINABILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
4,250.00
344.61OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
344.61
468.00PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
468.00
1.00PALADIN PLUMBING BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
100.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL
101.00
2,500.00PARENT BUILDERS ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC
2,500.00
1,819.96PARKTACULARSPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,819.96
525.00PATRIOT DIAMOND SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
525.00
10.00PAULSON JOLENE PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
10.00
225.00PEACOCK MARC GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
187.50PER MAR SECURITY SERVICES WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
187.50
125.00PETRIE GAYLE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
125.00
15.00PETTY CASH POLICE G & A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 25
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
15.00
2,578.92PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT FINANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,578.92
223.21PHILAYA LUTHER WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
223.21
815.78PHILLIPS TREE CARE LLC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
815.78
1,782.96PIEHOWSKI JUSTIN DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MISC EXPENSE
1,782.96
282.70PIERSON PLENETTE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
282.70
10,000.00POSTMASTERCOMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE
10,000.00
300.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
300.00
339.25PRECISE MRM, LLC.PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
339.25WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
339.25SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
339.25STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT
1,357.00
103.29PREMIUM WATERS INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
103.29
.38PRIDE ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
235.13BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL
235.51
56.32PUMP & METER SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
56.32
6,210.00QUALITY FLOW SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
6,210.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 26
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
65.25QUALITY PROPANE FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE ALARM & SPRINKLER
65.25
82.88QUICKSILVER EXPRESS COURIER GENERAL REPAIR POSTAGE
82.88
4,685.95RANDY'S ENVIORMENTAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
2,514.43REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
7,200.38
272.71RECKARD ANDREW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
272.71
5,020.26RECREATION SUPPLY CO CONCESSIONS OTHER
5,020.26
170.99RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
170.99
40,113.85-REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION, LLC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS BAL SHT RETAINAGE PAYABLE
802,277.00SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI
71,983.65-STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE
1,395,655.03STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
120.00PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,000.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
38,897.82STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,129,852.35
96.00RICHARDSON BLACKWELL KELSEY FITNESS PROGRAMS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
96.00
32,141.59RJM CONSTRUCTION LLC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE
10,619.25-GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES
21,522.34
355.98ROBERT B HILL CO REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
355.98
4,860.80ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY HUMAN RESOURCES SALARIES - TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES
3,012.18FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 27
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
7,872.98
606.95ROOT-O-MATIC AQUATIC PARK MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
606.95
36.41ROSEVILLE MIDWAY FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
36.41
1.00ROTO-ROOTER BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
100.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL
101.00
235.00RUSSELL KEVIN BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
235.00
123.25SAFE-FAST, INC.WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
123.25
900.00SAMBATEK, INC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
900.00
88.81SAM'S CLUB CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES
88.81
432.09SANDSTROM WENDY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
432.09
1,224.00SAVATREENATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5,610.00TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
6,834.00
225.00SCHEER CHERYL GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
225.00
1,702.47SCHINDLER ELEVATOR CORP GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET PREPAID EXPENSES
1,216.05FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,918.52
235.00SETS DESIGN INC.POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
235.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 28
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
360.00SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
3,190.00TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
3,550.00
1,153.57SHAPCO PRINTING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
1,153.57
2,853.34SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.ESCROWS GENERAL
15,471.38STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
18,324.72
18.36SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
254.97IT G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9.77ASSESSING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
9.77FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
568.34POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
18.36BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
18.36ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
897.93
156.00SIGN PRODUCERS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
156.00
612.00SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
612.00
89.68SIRCHIE ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC.POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
89.68
351.10SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
379.70IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
1,875.30IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
2,606.10
103.50SKB ENVIRONMENTAL PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE
103.49WATER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY
103.50PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
310.49
1,789.32SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNION DUES
1,789.32
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 29
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,050.00SORRELL SHAWN ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,050.00
680.70SPS COMPANIES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
253.18PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES
933.88
9,565.15SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
72,369.09STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
890.57WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,106.16SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
2,339.59STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
87,270.56
260.56ST PAUL CITY OF PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
260.56
221.54ST. CROIX CHILD SUPPORT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS
221.54
301.00STATE OF MINNESOTA ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES
301.00
250.00STICKS AND TONES SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
250.00
59.98STREICHER'S POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
5,185.72POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT
5,245.70
12,400.87SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC REILLY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
12,400.87
136.00SUSSER ERIN ART REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS
136.00
4,485.00SUSTAINABLE RESOURCES CENTER EMERGENCY REPAIR GRANTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,485.00
2.00SUTTON LAURA BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 30
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL
75.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL
142.00
3,000.00SWAN COMPANIES STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL
3,000.00
2,622.00SWANSON FLO-SYSTEMS CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
2,622.00
275.00SWANSON TIM GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
275.00
9,099.06SYSCO-MINNESOTA INC CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES
9,099.06
96.25TC FIT BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
96.25
16.77TELELANGUAGE INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
16.77
600.00THE JOLLY POPS LLC.SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
600.00
1,655.51THE MPX GROUP COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING
1,655.51
750.00THE TOONIES LLC SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
750.00
310.54THE UPS STORE WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
310.54
289.00THOMES KELSEY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
289.00
32.41THOMPSON BRETT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
32.41
319.98THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 31
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
319.98
213.10THRIVEPASSEMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
213.10
404.50TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
259.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
663.50
12.03TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
12.03
600.00TOTAL ENTERTAINMENT SPECIAL EVENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
600.00
1,488.00TRAFFIC CONTROL CORP RELAMPING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
1,488.00
32,000.00TRI STATE BOBCAT CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY
32,000.00
717.00TUBE PRO INC AQUATIC PARK G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
717.00
4,300.00TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE
4,300.00
139.99TWIN CITY SAW CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
139.99
31.25TYLER JORDAN GRANT BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS
31.25
102.71ULINEREC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
102.71
259.80UNANGST TANYA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
259.80
90.00UNO DOS TRES COMMUNICATIONS POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
90.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 32
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
275.98US AUTOFORCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
275.98
186.35UTILITY LOGIC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
186.35
593.64VAN PAPER COMPANY CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES
593.64
74.02VERIZONOTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
850.84SEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE
15,986.80TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT TELEPHONE
3,588.64CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE
20,500.30
200.00VERVILLE BLAKE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
200.00
211.10VIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES
211.10
5,900.00VITALS AWARE SERVICES INC.POLICE G & A TELEPHONE
5,900.00
65.00WARNER'S STELLIAN CO BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING
65.00
555.65WARNING LITES OF MN INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE
448.00HOLIDAY PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,003.65
3,933.19WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
18,748.54-SOLID WASTE G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
109,860.79SOLID WASTE G&A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE
39,958.92SOLID WASTE G&A RECYCLING SERVICE
25,529.31SOLID WASTE G&A YARD WASTE SERVICE
37,492.32SOLID WASTE G&A ORGANICS
198,025.99
130.20WATERS ANDREW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 33
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
130.20
1,600.30WATSON CO INC CONCESSIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES
3,786.42CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES
5,386.72
297.00WESTWOOD HILLS NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC. NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
297.00
6,394.80WESTWOOD SPORTS SOFTBALL GENERAL SUPPLIES
6,394.80
199.80WHIPPER SNAPPER LAWN SERVICE PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
199.80
17.85WHITE GREGORY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
17.85
81.43WILBANKS ANN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
81.43
331.53WILLIAMS MELANIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS
331.53
3,993.00WILSONS NURSERY INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,993.00
1,500.00WINCAN LLC SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT
1,500.00
696.43WINSUPPLY OF EDEN PRAIRIE WIRING REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
696.43
408.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY
408.00
3,330.74WSB ASSOC INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
11,895.50SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
32,355.76STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
47,582.00
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 34
6/29/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 9:30:29R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/25/20215/29/2021 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
2,108.00WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,108.00
13,209.48XCEL ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
19,316.59PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
36,875.16WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
4,882.67SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
1,538.42STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE
6,390.53PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE
28.96BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE
47.56WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE
18,818.03REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE
101,107.40
10.40ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE PUBLIC WORKS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
64.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
24.65WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
40.10PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
14.20NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
181.55WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES
142.10REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES
46.50VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES
523.50
544.92ZIP PRINTING WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES
544.92
Report Totals 4,239,937.24
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 35
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4b
Executive summary
Title: Rise on 7 planned unit development ordinance 2nd reading
Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance adding Section
36-268-PUD 19 to the zoning code and amending the zoning map from RC high-density
multiple-family residence to PUD 19 and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication.
Policy consideration: Does city council support the proposed development?
Summary: CommonBond Communities requests the city amend the zoning map and zoning text
in order to construct a five-story, 120-unit mixed-use building on property located at 8115
Highway 7.
The planning commission held a public hearing on May 19, 2021 and recommended approval of
a comprehensive plan amendment and preliminary and final plat. The commission
recommended approval of a preliminary and final planned unit development on June 2, 2021.
On June 21, 2021, city council unanimously approved a resolution amending the
Comprehensive Plan 2040 Land Use Map for 8115 Highway 7 from civic (CIV) to high density
residential (RH), a resolution for a preliminary and final plat, and approved the first reading of
the ordinance for a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD).
Financial or budget considerations: CommonBond applied to the economic development
authority (EDA) for tax increment financing (TIF) assistance. The exact amount of assistance
needed for the development won’t be known until other financing sources have been secured,
at which point, staff will present a more definitive recommendation for TIF assistance. To
bolster its upcoming financing application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Authority,
CommonBond requested a resolution of financial support from the EDA for TIF assistance
should it prove necessary. A resolution will be presented at the July 6, 2021 EDA meeting. The
parks and recreation advisory board recommends collecting $184,950 in park dedication fees
in-lieu of park land and $27,000 in trail dedication fees.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity
and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented
development.
Supporting documents: PUD ordinance
PUD ordinance summary for publication
June 21 city council staff report
Prepared by: Jacquelyn Kramer, associate planner
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Title: Rise on 7 planned unit development ordinance 2nd reading
Ordinance No. ____-21
Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating
Section 36-28 PUD 19 as a Planned Unit Development Zoning District for the
property located at 8115 Highway 7.
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning
commission (Case No. 21-18-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-268-PUD 19.
Section 2. The city council voted on June 21, 2021 to approve Resolution No. ____
amending the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the future land use designation for the subject
property located at 8115 Highway 7 from Civic to High Density Residential. Said comprehensive
plan amendment is associated with this ordinance and requires Metropolitan Council review
and authorization to put it into effect.
Section 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described
lands from R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence to PUD 19:
Lot 1, Block 1, Rise on 7, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Section 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 26-268 is hereby amended to add
the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District:
Section 36-268-PUD 19
a)Development Plans
The site located on property legally described at Lot 1, Block 1, Rise on 7, Hennepin
County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used, and maintained in conformance with the
following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits:
1.Survey
2.Preliminary Plat
3.Final Plat
4.C1-1 Demolition Plan
5.C2-1 Site Plan
6.C3-1 Grading Plan
7.C3-2 SWPPP
8.C3-3 SWPPP Notes
9.C4-1 Sanitary & Watermain
10.C4-2 Storm Sewer
11.L1-1 Landscape Plan
12.Landscape Details
13.Lighting Plan
14.A000 Cover Sheet
15.A300 Level 0 Plan
16.A310 Level 1 Plan
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Title: Rise on 7 planned unit development ordinance 2nd reading
17.A320 Level 2 Plan
18.A330 Level 3 Plan
19.A340 Level 4 Plan
20.A500 Exterior Elevations
21. A501 Exterior Elevations
22.A502 Exterior Elevations
23.A121 Shadow Study
The site shall also conform to the following requirements:
1.The property shall be developed with 120 dwelling units and 6,600 square feet of
commercial space.
2.The property shall include 167 off-street parking spaces.
3.The maximum height shall not exceed 55 feet and five (5) stories.
4.The site shall contain a minimum of 12 percent of the lot area as designed outdoor
recreation area
b)Uses
1.Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in PUD 19:
a.Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings,
including but not limited to, the residential leasing and property management
office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly room or general amenity space.
b.Group daycare/nursery schools complying with the following conditions:
i.At least 40 square feet of outside play space per pupil is provided.
ii.The outside play areas are enclosed with a fence.
iii.Dropoff and loading points are established which do not interfere with
traffic and pedestrian movements.
2.Accessory uses. Accessory uses are as follows:
a.Home occupations as regulated by this chapter.
b.Gardens.
c.Parking lots.
d.Public transit stops/shelters.
e.Outdoor seating, public address (PA) systems are prohibited.
f.Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited.
g.Accessory utility structures including:
i.Small wind energy conversion system as defined in 36-4 Definitions.
ii.Solar energy systems. A solar energy system with a supporting framework
that is either place on, or anchored in, the ground and that is independent of
any building or other structure; or that is affixed to or an integral part of a
principal or accessory building, including but not limited to photovoltaic or
hot water solar energy systems which are contained within roofing materials,
windows, skylights, and awnings.
iii.Cisterns and rainwater collection systems.
c)Special Performance Standards
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 4
Title: Rise on 7 planned unit development ordinance 2nd reading
1.All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall
be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design,
landscaping, parking, and screening requirements.
2.All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers
shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading
areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure.
3.Signs shall be allowed in conformance with the sign regulations for the R-C High
Density Multiple-Family Residence Zoning District and shall comply with the
following:
i.Pylon signs shall be prohibited.
Section 5. The contents of Planning Case File 21-16-CP, 21-17-S, 21-18-PUD are hereby
entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this
case.
Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the
associated comprehensive plan amendment approved by City Council resolution ___ and not
sooner than 15 days after publication.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
First reading June 21, 2021
Second reading July 6, 2021
Date of publication July 15, 2021
Date ordinance takes
effect
Upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated
comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than July 30, 2021.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 5
Title: Rise on 7 planned unit development ordinance 2nd reading
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. ____-21
An ordinance creating a new
planned unit development zoning district
8115 Highway 7
This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the property at 8115 Highway 7
from RC High-Density Multiple-Family Residence to PUD 19; and the Zoning Code Section 36-
268 will be amended to add Section 36-268-PUD 19.
This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated
comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Jake Spano /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 15, 2021
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4c
Executive summary
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
Recommended action:
•Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance vacating the slope easement
along the west side of Beltline Boulevard between Park Glen Road and 35th Street West
and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication (requires 5 affirmative votes);
•Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance adding section 36-268-PUD 20 to
the zoning code and amending the zoning map from MX-1 vertical mixed-use to PUD 20
and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication (requires 5 affirmative votes).
Policy consideration: Does city council support the proposed development?
Summary: Opus Group proposes a new development at 3440 Beltline Blvd. The proposal
includes a five-story, 250-unit mixed-use building with 7,450 square feet of commercial space
and six live/work units on the ground floor fronting Beltline Boulevard. Due to high ground
water and floodplain, parking will be provided in a three-story above ground ramp and in a 28-
stall surface parking lot. The housing will be mixed-income, with 10% of the units affordable at
50% area median income (AMI), meeting the city’s inclusionary housing policy requirements.
Although the application is not subject to the newest provisions of the recently amended
policy, it does include several three-bedroom units to assist in city council’s goals for family-
sized housing.
The applicant applied for a slope easement vacation, a preliminary and final plat and a
preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). A PUD is a zoning map and zoning text
amendment to create a new zoning district specific to the property. City council voted 7 to 0 to
approve the first readings of the alley vacation and PUD and approve the preliminary and final
plat on June 21, 2021.
Financial or budget considerations: None at this time. There are extraordinary costs associated
with the proposed redevelopment site, and the developer applied for tax increment financing
(TIF). Staff and the economic development authority’s (EDA) financial consultant, Ehlers, are
reviewing the TIF request and will bring a recommendation to the EDA in the coming months.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Vacation ordinance and summary ordinance for publication
PUD ordinance and summary ordinance for publication
Official exhibits
Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor
Karen Barton, community development director.
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
Ordinance No. ____-21
An ordinance vacating a slope easement
West side of Beltline Boulevard between Park Glen Road and 35th Street West
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. The petition to vacate the slope easement was initiated by John McCain, on
behalf of Belt Line Properties, Inc. Belt Line Properties owns the majority of the properties
abutting the slope easement proposed to be vacated. Notice of said petition has been
published in the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor on June 10, 2021, and the City Council has conducted a
public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the slope easement is not needed
for public purposes, and that is it in the best interest of the public that said slope easement be
vacated.
Section 2. The following described slope easement as now dedicated and laid out within
the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park, is vacated:
A 20 foot slope easement over, under and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, Belt
Line Industrial Park 2nd Addition according to the recorded plat thereof,
Hennepin County Minnesota lying Westerly of a line 34.00 feet Westerly of the
following described line, hereinafter referred to as Line A, and Northerly of Line B.
Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 59 degrees
15 minutes 24 seconds East on an assumed bearing along the southeasterly
extension of the southwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 40.00 feet to the
point of beginning of said line; thence North 30 degrees 44 minutes 36 seconds
East 112.38 feet; thence Northerly 768.57 feet along a tangential curve concave
to the west having a radius of 785.30 feet and a central angle of 56 degrees 04
minutes 30 seconds, and said line there terminating.
Line B is drawn from a point on Line A 210 feet North of its point of beginning to
the radial point.
Section 3: The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the
Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be.
Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 30, 2021)
First reading June 21, 2021
Second reading July 6, 2021
Date of publication July 15, 2021
Date ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 3
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 4
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 5
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 6
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. ____-21
An ordinance vacating a slope easement
West side of Beltline Boulevard between Park Glen Road and 35th Street West
This ordinance states that the slope easement along Beltline Boulevard adjacent to 3440 Beltline
Boulevard will be vacated.
This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Jake Spano /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 15, 2021
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 7
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
Ordinance No. ____-21
Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating
Section 36-268-PUD 20 as a Planned Unit Development Zoning District for the
property located at 3440 Beltline Boulevard
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning
commission (Case No. 21-20-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-268-PUD 20.
Section 2. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described
lands from MX-1 vertical mixed-use to PUD 20:
Lot 1, Block 1, Beltline Industrial Park 4th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Section 3. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 26-268 is hereby amended to add
the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District:
Section 26-268-PUD 20
(a)Development Plans
The site located on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Beltline Industrial Park
4th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used and maintained in
conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits:
1.Preliminary Plat
2.Final Plat
3.C000 Cover sheet
4.Existing conditions survey
5.C100 General notes
6.C101 Tree inventory and preservation plan
7.C200 Existing conditions and removal plan
8.C300 Erosion and sediment control plan – phase 1
9.C301 Erosion and sediment control plan – phase 2
10.C302 Erosion and sediment control details
11.C303 SWPPP
12.C400 Site plan
13.C401 Fire access plan
14.C500 Grading plan
15.C501 Stormwater management plan
16.C502 Stormwater details
17.C503 Stormwater details
18.C600 Utility plan
19.C700 Construction details
20.C701 Construction details
21.C702 Construction details
22.C703 Construction details
23.L100 Landscape plan
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 8
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
24. L101 Landscape schedule
25. L102 Landscape details
26. L103 DORA plan
27. A.00 Cover sheet
28. A.01 Concept Level 1
29. A.02 Concept Level 2
30. A.03 Concept Level 3
31. A.04 Concept Level 4
32. A.05 Concept Level 5
33. A.06 Concept Roof Plan
34. A.07 Concept Elevations
35. A.08 Concept Elevations
36. A.09 Concept Elevations and Diagrams
37. A.10 Project Information and Details
38. A.11 Project Images
39. Sun Studies
40. E060 Site Photometric Plan
41. E061 Site Photometric Fixture Cut Sheet
The Site shall also conform to the following requirements:
1. The property shall be developed with 250 residential units and a minimum of
7,400 square feet of ground floor commercial.
2. At least 352 off street-parking spaces shall be constructed. Up to a 20 percent
reduction of required parking may be permitted for residential and non-
residential uses under the terms of a parking management plan approved by the
zoning administrator.
3. The maximum building height shall be 56 feet and five stories.
4. The site shall contain a minimum of 12 percent designed outdoor recreation area
based on private developable land area.
(b) Uses
1. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in PUD 20:
a. Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings,
including but not limited to, the residential office, fitness facility, mail room,
assembly room or general amenity space.
2. Permitted with Conditions. The following uses are permitted with conditions in
PUD 20:
a. Live/work units.
i. Live-work uses as defined by Sec. 36-142 of city code are
permitted on the first floor.
ii. A Registration of Land Use (RLU) shall be approved by the city
when there is a change in commercial tenant.
b. Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and
are limited to the following: restaurants, coffee shops, office, private
entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms and studios.
i. All parking requirements must be met for each use.
ii. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m.
to 12 a.m.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 9
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
iii. In vehicle sales is prohibited.
3. Accessory uses: Accessory uses are as follows:
a. Home occupations as regulated by this chapter.
b. Gardens.
c. Parking lots.
d. Public transit stops/shelters.
e. Outdoor seating.
f. Public address (PA) systems are prohibited.
g. Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited.
h. Accessory utility structures including:
i. Small wind energy conversion system as defined in 36-4
Definitions.
ii. Solar energy systems. A solar energy system with a supporting
framework that is either place on, or anchored in, the ground and
that is independent of any building or other structure; or that is
affixed to or an integral part of a principal or accessory building,
including but not limited to photovoltaic or hot water solar energy
systems which are contained within roofing materials, windows,
skylights, and awnings.
iii. Cisterns and rainwater collection systems.
(c) Special Performance Standards
1. All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall
be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design,
landscaping, parking, and screening requirements.
2. All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers
shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading
areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure.
3. Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the MX Zoning Districts and shall
comply with the following:
a. Pylon signs shall be prohibited.
4. Awnings.
a. Awnings shall be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass.
Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited.
b. Backlit awnings shall be prohibited.
Section 4. The contents of Planning Case File 21-19-S, 21-20-PUD, 21-21-VAC are hereby
entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 30, 2021)
First reading June 21, 2021
Second reading July 6, 2021
Date of publication July 15, 2021
Date ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 10
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 11
Title: Second reading of ordinances relating to a development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. ____-21
Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating
Section 36-268-PUD 20 as a Planned Unit Development Zoning District for the
property located at 3440 Beltline Boulevard.
This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the property at 3440 Beltline
Boulevard from MX-1 vertical mixed use to PUD 20; and the Zoning Code Section 36-268 will be
amended to add Section 36-268-PUD 20.
This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Jake Spano /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 15, 2021
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4d
Executive summary
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
Recommended action: Motion to approve the second reading and adopt Ordinance amending
chapter 36 pertaining to the animal handling uses and approve summary ordinance for publication.
Policy consideration: Does the council wish to amend the zoning ordinance to create a limited
animal handling land use category?
Summary: John Kohler, representing Paster Properties who own the Texa-Tonka mall, requests
an amendment to the zoning code to create a land use category called “limited animal
handling” and to allow it as a permitted use at the Texa-Tonka mall, which is zoned the MX-1
mixed use district.
Background: The intent of this amendment is to create a second animal handling land use
category called “limited animal handling” to allow pet stores, veterinary clinics and grooming
facilities that are less likely to create nuisances for adjacent properties. The proposed limited
animal handling land use category will allow these uses without requiring a minimum
separation from residential and allows them to operate in more areas of the city. The proposed
category excludes uses having animal boarding, including animal daycares.
If approved, the applicant could lease space in Texa-Tonka shopping center to a proposed dog
grooming facility per the revised zoning code.
The planning commission conducted a public hearing on June 2, 2021. No comments were
received from the public and the planning commission recommended approval.
The city council unanimously approved the first reading on June 21, 2021.
Financial or budget considerations: None.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Ordinance
Summary ordinance
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, assistant zoning administrator
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
Ordinance No. ___-21
Ordinance regarding animal handling
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Whereas, the planning commission conducted a public hearing on June 2, 2021 on the
ordinance, and
Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning
commission (case no. 21-23-ZA), and
Now, therefore be it resolved that the following amendments shall be made to the City
Code:
Section 1. Land Use Descriptions and Characteristics. Chapter 36, Section 36-142(d) of the
St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text (renumber
accordingly):
(2)Animal handling, limited means any animal handling use such as veterinary clinics, pet
stores, and pet grooming that do not include boarding, daycare or outdoor off leash
recreation space for animals. The use may require an animal to be kept overnight on-site
for treatment but does not include boarding or animal daycares.
Section 2. C-1 neighborhood commercial district. Chapter 36, Section 36-193(c)(5) of the
St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and to delete
the following struck-out text:
(5)Animal handling. The conditions are as follows:
a.No animals or pens shall be kept outside the building or cause offensive odor or
noise discernible at the property line of the lot on which the activity is
conducted.
b.Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night and
shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, and the facility shall
be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is zoned residential and
used or subdivided for residential, or has an occupied institutional building,
including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community
centers.
Section 3. C-2 general commercial district. Chapter 36, Section 36-194(c)(7) of the St.
Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and delete the
following struck-out text:
(7)Animal handling. The conditions are as follows:
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
a.No animals shall be kept outside the building, or be otherwise located, which
cause offensive odor or noise discernible at the property line of the lot on which
the activity is conducted.
b.Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night and
shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, additionally the
facility shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is zoned
residential and used or subdivided for residential, or has an occupied
institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions,
and community centers.
Section 4. BP business park district. Chapter 36, Section 36-233(c)(9) of the St. Louis Park
City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text:
(9)Restaurants, retail, limited animal handling or service. The conditions are as follows:
a.The uses may not exceed 25% of the gross floor area of a single-story building or
50% of the ground floor area in a multi-story building.
b.The uses must be so located as to be visible and easily accessible to pedestrians
from the public right-of-way.
Section 5. I-G general industrial district. Chapter 36, Section 36-244(c)(5) of the St. Louis
Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and delete the following
struck-out text:
(5)Animal handling. The conditions are as follows:
a.No animals shall be kept outside the building or cause offensive odor or noise
discernible at the property line of the lot on which the activity is conducted.
(b)Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night and
shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, additionally the
facility shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is zoned
residential and used or subdivided for residential use, or has an occupied
institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions,
and community centers.
Section 6. MX-1 vertical mixed use district. Chapter 36, Section 36-264 Table 36-263(b) of
the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text:
Table 36-263(b) Mixed Use District Uses
Primary Street
Frontage
Secondary Street
Frontage
RESIDENTIAL AND LODGING USES
Multifamily residential PC PC
Live-work unit PC PC
Roominghouse PL PL
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 4
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
Primary Street
Frontage
Secondary Street
Frontage
State-licensed residential facility PL PL
Group home/non-statutory PL PL
Nursing home PL PL
Hotel/motel PC PC
CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL USES
Education/academic PL P
Museum/library category P P
Police/fire station PC PC
COMMERCIAL USES
Animal handling, limited, less than 8,000 square feet P P
Animal handling, limited, 8,000 square feet or larger PC PC
Brewery, Micro-distillery PC PC
Business/trade school/college PL P
Dental office, Medical office P P
Food service P P
Grocery store PC PC
Liquor store CUP CUP
Medical office P P
Micro-distillery PC PC
Offices PL P
Private entertainment (indoor) CUP CUP
Research and development PL P
Retail, Service - less than 8,000 square feet P P
Retail, Service - 8,000 square feet or larger PC PC
Retail, large item PC PC
Restaurants with or without intoxicating liquor
license P P
Service facilities, less than 8,000 square feet P P
Service facilities, 8,000 square feet or larger PC PC
Studios PC PC
INDUSTRIAL USES
Catering PC PC
Printing process/supply PC PC
Showrooms PC PC
TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE USES
Communication antennas CUP CUP
Transit stations P P
Section 7. MX-1 vertical mixed use district. Chapter 36, Section 36-264(d) of the St. Louis
Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text:
(12)Animal handling, limited, 8,000 square feet or larger.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 5
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
a.The customer service space shall be located at a corner of the building or
near a primary building entrance.
b.The animal handling limited space shall not occupy more than 25 percent of
the gross floor area of the ground floor.
Section 8. MX-2 neighborhood mixed use district. Chapter 36, Section 36-265(d) of the St.
Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and delete the
following struck-out text:
(2)Animal handling.
a.No animals or pens shall be kept outside the building or cause offensive
odor or noise discernible at the property line of the lot on which the
activity is conducted.
b.Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night
shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, additionally
the facility shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is
zoned residential and used for residential.
Section 9. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-1 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby
amended to add the following underlined text:
(b) Permitted uses.
Zone A
(2)Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are
limited to the following: office, medical or dental office, adult day care, group day
care/nursery school, group home/nonstatutory, banks without drive-up facilities,
food service, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, limited animal
handling, showrooms and studios.
a.All parking requirements must be met for each use.
b.Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m.
c.No drive up facilities are allowed.
Section 10. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-2 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby
amended to add the following underlined text:
(c)Uses permitted with conditions. A structure of land in the PUD 2 district may be
used for one or more of the following uses if it complies with the conditions
specified for the use in this subsection:
(1)Commercial uses. Commercial uses limited to the following: bank, food service,
grocery store, large item retail, liquor store, medical or dental office, office,
private entertainment (indoor), retail, service, showroom, limited animal
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 6
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
handling and studio. These commercial uses shall meet the following
conditions:
a.Commercial uses are limited to the first floor.
b.Hours of operation, including loading/unloading of deliveries, for
commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m.
c.In-vehicle sales or service is prohibited.
d.Restaurants are prohibited.
e.Outdoor storage is prohibited.
Section 11. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-7 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby
amended to add the following underlined text:
(b)Permitted uses.
(2)Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are
limited to the following: medical office, office, private entertainment (indoor),
retail shops, service, showrooms, limited animal handling and studios.
a.All parking requirements shall be met for each use.
b.Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m.
including commercial deliveries.
c.Each commercial tenant space on the first floor shall have a direct and
primary access to the outside of the building on the north building elevation
that is open during business hours.
d.In vehicle sales is prohibited.
e.Restaurants are prohibited.
Section 12. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-8 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby
amended to add the following underlined text:
(b)Permitted with conditions.
(2)Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are
limited to coffee shops, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops,
service, showrooms, limited animal handling and studios. The conditions are as
follows:
a.All parking requirements must be met for each use.
b.Hours of operation shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m.
c.Restaurants are prohibited.
d.In vehicle sales is prohibited.
Section 13. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-10 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby
amended to add the following underlined text:
(b)Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses in PUD 10:
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 7
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
(1)Shopping Center. The shopping center shall be limited to the following uses:
a.Office.
b.Medical of dental office.
c.Adult day care.
d.Group day care/nursery school.
e.Bank.
f.Food service.
g.Private entertainment (indoor).
h.Retail.
i.Liquor store.
j. Service.
k.Showroom.
l. Studios.
m. Restaurants with or without intoxicating liquor.
n. Museum.
o.Police service substation.
p.Post office.
q.Animal handling, limited.
Section 14. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-12 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby
amended to add the following underlined text:
(b)Permitted uses.
The following uses are permitted uses:
1.Medical and dental office
2.Funeral homes
3.Libraries
4.Museums
5.Office
6.Parks and open spaces
7.Police and fire stations
8.Banks
9.Business/trade school/college
10.Retail shops up to 20,000 square feet
11.Service
12.Studios
13.Public service structures
14.Food service
15.Restaurants with or without intoxicating liquor
16.More than one principal building located on a single lot
17.Animal handling, limited.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 8
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
Section 15. This ordinance shall take effect June 11, 2021.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
First Reading June 21, 2021
Second Reading July 6, 2021
Date of Publication July 15, 2021
Date Ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 9
Title: Second reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses
Summary ordinance
Ordinance No. ____-21
An ordinance amending
the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance
pertaining to animal handling land use
This ordinance amends Chapter 36 of the City of St. Louis Park city code relating to
zoning. The amendment creates a second animal handling land use called limited animal
handling, states which zoning districts the use is allowed and clarifies existing language
pertaining to animal handling.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Jake Spano /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 15, 2021
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4e
Executive summary
Title: Second reading of ordinance for major amendment to planned unit development for
Parkway Residences
Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending
Section 36-268-PUD 15 of the zoning code relating to previous development approvals for
Parkway Residences phase III and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication.
Policy consideration: Is the city council supportive of the amendment to PUD 15?
Summary: Sela Investments, Ltd. requests a major amendment to Section 36-268-PUD 15 which
established the zoning requirements for Parkway Residences, located along 31st Street West
between Inglewood Avenue South and Glenhurst Avenue South. The city council approved the
Parkway Residences planned unit development (PUD) in February 2020 which allowed for a 37-
unit multifamily building with 26 interior parking spaces on the southeast corner of Inglewood
Avenue and 31st Street West.
The applicant requests a change to the PUD to add ten additional interior parking spaces and
relocate four ground floor residential units to the southeast side of the building. This change
would require the relocation of four ground level units, three of which will be added to the
building’s southeast side and would add 10 interior parking spaces to the building’s ground
floor. The change also includes changing two studios to two two-bedroom units. Under the
original approvals, the building was required to be constructed with a partial green roof and
solar ready. With the changes, they will still include the partial green roof and propose installing
solar panels at the time of construction. The slightly larger roof space helps accommodate the
panels. The rooftop amenity deck has been removed from the plans and ground level space on
the site has been redesigned to meet outdoor recreational requirements.
City council held a first reading of the ordinance on June 21, 2021 and voted 7 to 0 to approve
the PUD major amendment.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Draft PUD 15 ordinance amendment
Summary ordinance for publication
Official exhibits
Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Title: Second reading of ordinance for major amendment to planned unit development for Parkway Residences
Ordinance No. ____-21
Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by amending
Section 36-268-PUD 15 the Planned Unit Development zoning district for the
property located at 4105, 4117, and 4125 31st Street West
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendations of the
planning commission (Case No: 21-22-PUD) for amending the zoning ordinance Section 36-268-
PUD 15.
Section 2. The Comprehensive Plan designations the following described lands as High
Density Residential:
Lot 1, Block 2, Manhattan Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota
Section 3. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 9 is hereby amended by
adding underscored text and deleting strikethrough text. Section breaks are represented by
***.
Section 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 15 is hereby amended
to add the following changes:
***
(3) Site 3
A. Site 3, legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Manhattan Park Second Addition,
Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used, and maintained in
conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits:
1. C3.0.0 Title Sheet
2. V3.1.0 Alta/NSPS Land Title Survey
3. C3.1.0 Removals Plan
4. C3.2.0 Site Plan
5. C3.3.0 Grading Plan
6. C3.4.0 Utility Plan
7. C3.5.0 Civil Details
8. C3.5.1 Civil Details
9. C3.5.2 Civil Details
10. SW3.1.0 SWPPP Existing Conditions
11. SW3.1.1 SWPPP Proposed Conditions
12. SW3.1.2 SWPP – Details
13. SW3.1.3 SWPPP – Narrative
14. SW3.1.4 SWPPP – Attachments
15. SW3.1.5 SWPPP - Attachments
16. 12.0 Floor Plan Level 1
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 3
Title: Second reading of ordinance for major amendment to planned unit development for Parkway Residences
17. 13.0 Floor Plan Level 2
18. 14.0 Floor Plan Level 3
19. 15.0 Floor Plan Level 4
20. 15.2 Floor Plan Roof Deck
21. 16.0 Elevation – North
22. 17.0 Elevation – South
23. 18.0 Elevation – East & West
24. 23.0 DORA Site Plan
25. AL103 Photometric Plan
26. LS103 Landscape Layout Plan LS100 Layout Plan
27. LS103 Layout Plan LS101 Layout Plan
28. LP103 Planting Plan LP100 Planting Plan
B. Site 3 shall also conform to the following requirements:
1. Parking shall be provided off-street in structured parking and on-street.
i. A total of 26 37 parking spaces will be provided in structured parking.
2. The property shall be developed with 37 residential units.
3. The maximum building height shall not exceed 50 feet and four (4) stories
4. The site shall include a minimum 12 percent designed outdoor recreation
area.
***
A. Accessory uses:
Accessory uses are as follows:
1. Home occupations as regulated by this chapter. Home occupations are
permitted with the condition that they comply with the following conditions:
i. All material or equipment shall be stored within an enclosed
structure.
ii. Operation of the home occupation is not apparent from the public
right-of-way.
iii. The activity does not involve warehousing, distribution or retail sales
of merchandise produced off the site.
iv. No person is employed at the residence who does not legally reside in
the home except that a licensed group family day care facility may
have one outside employee.
v. No light of vibration originating from the business operation is
discernible at the property line.
vi. Only equipment, machinery and materials which are normally found
in the home are used in the conduct of the home occupation.
vii. No more than one non-illuminated wall sign limited to two square
feet in area is used to identify the home occupation.
viii. Space within the dwelling devoted to the home occupation does not
exceed one room or ten percent of the floor area, whichever is
greater.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 4
Title: Second reading of ordinance for major amendment to planned unit development for Parkway Residences
ix. No portion of the home occupation is permitted within any attached
or detached accessory building.
x. The structure housing the home occupation conforms to the building
code; and in the case where the home occupation is day care or if
there are any customers or students, the home occupation has
received a certificate of occupancy.
Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 30, 2021)
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
First reading June 21, 2021
Second reading July 6, 2021
Date of publication July 15, 2021
Date ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 5
Title: Second reading of ordinance for major amendment to planned unit development for Parkway Residences
SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION
Ordinance No. ____-21
Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by amending
Section 36-268-PUD 15 the Planned Unit Development zoning district for the
property located at 4105, 4117, and 4125 31st Street West
This ordinance states that Section 36-268-PUD 15 of the zoning code related to Parkway
Residences development will be amended to add 10 additional parking spaces to phase III,
Parkway Commons.
This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Jake Spano /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 15, 2021
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4f
Executive summary
Title: Retirement recognition for Appraiser I Mark Hoppe
Recommended action: Motion to Adopt Resolution to recognize Mark Hoppe for his 21 years of
service.
Policy consideration: None at this time.
Summary: City policy states that employees who retire or resign in good standing with over 20
years of service will be presented with a resolution from the mayor, city manager and city
council. Mark has chosen not to be honored with a presentation and will not be attending the
council meeting.
This consent item will officially adopt the resolution that honors Mark for his years of service.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Ali Timpone, interim human resources officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Title: Retirement recognition for Appraiser I Mark Hoppe
Resolution no. 21-____
Resolution of the
City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota
recognizing the contributions and expressing appreciation to
Appraiser Mark Hoppe
Whereas, Mark Hoppe began his employment with the City of St. Louis Park 21 years
ago on January 10, 2000; and
Whereas, Mark performed the annual cycle of quintile inspections, sale screening and
reconciliations, permit pick-ups and smoothly applied modeling techniques which produced
well supported file documentation and thereby the foundation for all work to follow; and
Whereas, Mark used that foundational work to play a very important role in setting
consistently accurate and equitable assessments – envied by many professional peers; and
Whereas, Mark listened with an open mind to numerous appeals over the years with a
delightful ability to summarize the crux of the equation in resolving concerns; and
Whereas, Mark has patiently explained the assessment process, the taxation process and
the value of living in this wonderful community to thousands of customers; and
Whereas, Mark also volunteered to support fellow employees and the community in areas
such as a benefits committee representative and serving with civic-minded pride as an election
judge; and
Whereas, Mark plans to enjoy a well-deserved retirement and will be greatly missed;
Now therefore be it resolved that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
by this resolution and public record, would like to thank Mark Hoppe for his great contributions
and 21 years of dedicated service to the City of St. Louis Park and wish him the best in his
retirement.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4g
Executive summary
Title: Authorize parking restrictions on 43rd 1/2 Street west of Wooddale Avenue
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the installation of parking
restrictions on the south side of 43rd 1/2 Street and the cul-de-sac west of Wooddale Avenue.
Policy consideration: The installation of parking restrictions is allowed per the city’s established
regulatory authority.
Summary: The request for parking restrictions on 43rd 1/2 Street is a result of the recent
changes implemented on Wooddale Avenue as part of the Southeast Bikeway improvements
that were approved by council in 2020 and constructed in late 2020 and spring of 2021.
On May 22, pavement marking installation for the Southeast Bikeways project began that
included pavement striping, no parking signage, bike symbols and crosswalks. We heard from
residents that the work on Wooddale Avenue had increased parking on 43rd 1/2 St west of
Wooddale Avenue. Vehicles are parking on both sides of the road which prevents access for
emergency services, garbage, organics, and recycling pick-up. The residents in the area
contacted the city and are requesting parking restrictions to allow these services to continue
uninterrupted.
The request was brought to the traffic committee in June for their review and
recommendation. Their recommendation is to sign the entire cul-de-sac and the south side of
43rd 1/2 Street “no-parking.
The parking restrictions are recommended to allow access for residents, emergency services
and solid waste collection to occur.
Financial or budget considerations: The cost of enacting these controls is minimal and will
come out of the general operating budget.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution
Location map
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, senior engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Title: Authorize parking restrictions on 43rd 1/2 Street west of Wooddale Avenue
Discussion
Background: The request for parking restrictions on 43rd 1/2 Street is a result of the recent
changes implemented on Wooddale Avenue as part of the Southeast Bikeway improvements
that were approved by council in 2020. Construction of the parking bays on Wooddale Avenue
began in late summer of 2020 and all the concrete and asphalt work was completed as part of
the project. Due to the cold weather and early snowfall the decision was made to suspended
work in late October and complete the pavement markings and signage in the spring of 2021.
On May 22, 2021 pavement marking installation for the project began that included pavement
striping, no parking signage, bike symbols and crosswalks. We heard from residents that the
work on Wooddale Avenue has increased parking on 43rd 1/2 St west of Wooddale Avenue.
Vehicles are routinely parking on both sides of the road which prevents access for emergency
services, garbage, organics, and recycling pick-up. The residents in the area have contacted the
city and requested parking restrictions to allow these services to continue uninterrupted.
Staff from the fire department, solid waste and engineering visited the site and agreed that
43rd 1/2 Street isn’t wide enough for parking on both sides. In late May a letter was sent to the
five residential properties adjacent to 43 1/2 Street and 32 residential properties on Wooddale
within approximately 500 feet of 43 1/2 Street notifying them that temporary no-parking signs
were to be installed on the south side of 43rd 1/2 Street. At that time, staff did not include no
parking signage in the cul-de-sac in an effort to minimize the loss of parking to the residents on
43rd 1/2. The letter stated that the matter would be brought to the traffic committee for
review and recommendation regarding a permanent solution to the parking concerns.
The request was brought to the traffic committee in June for their review and
recommendation. Their recommendation is to sign the entire cul-de-sac and the south side of
43rd 1/2 Street “no-parking” (see the attached graphic for locations).
On June 15, 2021, a letter was sent to the same five residential properties adjacent to 43rd 1/2
Street and 32 residential properties on Wooddale within approximately 500 feet of 43rd 1/2
Street with the recommendation from the traffic committee. The letter asked for feedback
related to the recommendation. Only one response was received from the June 15 letter and
they concurred that parking in the cul-de-sac should be prohibited.
•The parking continues to be problematic. Cars are parked at the curves (which is ok to
park). This is creating a challenge to get into our driveways. Certainly no emergency
vehicle would be able, especially as now folks are also parking at the end of cul de sac. It
would be helpful to have no parking at end of cul de sac (a must in winter due to snow
plow) and on one of the curves. Happy to have it now parking on outside of curve as I
know the Wilkinson’s use their side (red car in photo).
Diane Jordon, 4324 43 1/2 Street
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4g) Page 3
Title: Authorize parking restrictions on 43rd 1/2 Street west of Wooddale Avenue
Resolution No. 21-____
Authorize parking restrictions on West 43rd 1/2 Street
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park received a request to evaluate traffic concerns on West
43rd 1/2 Street west of Wooddale Avenue; and,
Whereas, the traffic committee has reviewed the request and recommended the
installation of parking restrictions on the south side of West 43rd 1/2 Street and the cul-de-sac
west of Wooddale Avenue; and,
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely, and reliably.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that the engineering director is hereby authorized to:
1.Install all-day parking restrictions on the south side of West 43rd 1/2 Street and
the cul-de-sac west of Wooddale Avenue.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
DART AVE
SWOODDALE AVE
43 1/2 ST
W
4333
4356
4339
4337
4363
4324
4320
4359
4330
4325
4321
4350
4329
4335
4326
4340
4325
4328
0 100 20050
Feet´
43 1/2 Street Proposed No Parking
June 15, 2021
Legend
43 1/2 Street Proposed NO PARKING
Page 4 City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Authorize parking restrictions on 43rd 1/2 Street west of Wooddale Avenue
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4h
Executive summary
Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 3029 Monterey Avenue South
Recommended action: Motion to adopt a resolution authorizing the special assessment for the
repair of the sewer service line at 3029 Monterey Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN.
P.I.D. 06-028-24-12-0012.
Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by
the city council.
Summary: Tammy Schemmel, owner of the single-family residence at 3029 Monterey Avenue
South, has requested the city authorize the repair of the sewer service line for his/her home
and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy.
The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water and/or
sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put
into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like
this is unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed,
submitted, and approved by city staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer
service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this
repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owner has petitioned the city
to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total eligible
cost of the repair has been determined to be $7,880.00.
Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special
assessment.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Jay Hall, utility superintendent
Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent
Emily Carr, assessing technician
Cynthia S. Walsh, director of operations and recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 3029 Monterey Avenue South
Resolution No. 21-____
Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the
sewer service line at 3029 Monterey Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN
P.I.D. 06-028-24-12-0012
Whereas, the property owner at 3029 Monterey Avenue South, has petitioned the City
of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the
single family residence located at 3029 Monterey Avenue South; and
Whereas, the property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of
notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
Whereas, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
1. The petition from the property owner requesting the approval and special assessment for
the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and
specifications approved by the Operations and Recreation Department and Department of
Inspections is hereby accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $7,880.00.
4. The property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal
from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by
other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The property owner has agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements
through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 3.50%.
6. The property owner has executed an agreement with the city and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of
all costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4i
Executive summary
Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 4530 Vallacher Avenue South
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the
repair of the sewer service line at 4530 Vallacher Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN.
P.I.D. 07-028-24-12-0059.
Policy consideration: The proposed action is consistent with policy previously established by
the city council.
Summary: James Zachinni, owners of the single-family residence at 4530 Vallacher Avenue
South, has requested the city to authorize the repair of the sewer service line for their home
and assess the cost against the property in accordance with the city’s special assessment policy.
The city requires the repair of service lines to promote the general public health, safety and welfare
within the community. The special assessment policy for the repair or replacement of water or
sewer service lines for existing homes was adopted by the city council in 1996. This program was put
into place because sometimes property owners face financial hardships when emergency repairs like
this are unexpectedly required. Plans and permits for this service line repair work were completed,
submitted, and approved by city staff. The property owner hired a contractor and repaired the sewer
service line in compliance with current codes and regulations. Based on the completed work, this
repair qualifies for the city’s special assessment program. The property owners have petitioned the
city to authorize the sewer service line repair and special assess the cost of the repair. The total
eligible cost of the repair has been determined to be $ 7,190.00.
Financial or budget considerations: The city has funds in place to finance the cost of this special
assessment.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Jay Hall, utility superintendent
Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent
Emily Carr, assessing technician
Cynthia S. Walsh, director of operations and recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4i) Page 2
Title: Special assessment – sewer service line repair at 4530 Vallacher Avenue South
Resolution No. 21-____
Resolution authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the
sewer service line at 4530 Vallacher Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN
P.I.D. 07-028-24-12-0059
Whereas, the property owner at 4530 Vallacher Avenue South, has petitioned the City
of St. Louis Park to authorize a special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line for the
single family residence located at 4530 Vallacher Avenue South; and
Whereas, the property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, right of
notice and right of appeal pursuant to Minnesota Statute, Chapter 429; and
Whereas, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Utility Superintendent related to the repair of the sewer service line.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
1. The petition from the property owner requesting the approval and special assessment for
the sewer service line repair is hereby accepted.
2. The sewer service line repair that was done in conformance with the plans and
specifications approved by the Operations and Recreation Department and Department of
Inspections is hereby accepted.
3. The total cost for the repair of the sewer service line is accepted at $7,190.00.
4. The property owner has agreed to waive the right to a public hearing, notice and appeal
from the special assessment; whether provided by Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, or by
other statutes, or by ordinance, City Charter, the constitution, or common law.
5. The property owner has agreed to pay the city for the total cost of the above improvements
through a special assessment over a ten (10) year period at the interest rate of 3.50%.
6. The property owner has executed an agreement with the city and all other documents
necessary to implement the repair of the sewer service line and the special assessment of
all costs associated therewith.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 4j
Official minutes
Planning commission
June 2, 2021 – 6:00 p.m.
Members present: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Jessica Kraft, Sam Tift,
Tom Weber, Joffrey Wilson
Members absent: none
Staff present: Jennifer Monson, Jacquelyn Kramer, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther, Clint Pires
Guests: Dean Newins, Nick Murnane, Tim Callahan, John Kohler, Asher Michels-Allen
1. Call to order – roll call
2. Approval of minutes – May 19, 2021
Commissioner Kraft made a motion, Commissioner Beneke seconded, to accept the May
19, 2021, minutes as presented. The motion passed unanimously.
3. Hearings
3a. Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.
Applicant: Opus Group
Case No: 21-19-S, 21-20-PUD
Ms. Monson presented the report.
Commissioner Beneke asked what the difference is between MX-1 and the PUD. Ms.
Monson stated MX-1 would require more commercial on the ground floor along Beltline
Boulevard. She added the live-work units do offer the flexibility and opportunity for
commercial use along the ground floor.
Commissioner Weber asked if the city is viewing this as a marquee development in St.
Louis Park. Ms. Monson agreed and stated that this development is in line with the
vision for Beltline Boulevard. She added staff met with many prospective developers for
this site and shared the city wanted to make sure development meets the city’s goals as
outlined in the Beltline Station Area Plan. She stated what is being proposed implements
the vision for Beltline Boulevard/Station area, and this development is similar to what
was shown in public feedback sessions during the station area planning process.
Commissioner Weber asked if the alley, when built, will be the city’s responsibility. Ms.
Monson stated that is correct, adding provided it is constructed to city standards and it
is in proper condition when it is transferred. The exact location of the alley connection
to Park Glen Road will also need to be confirmed, as it would be preferable to connect
at a right angle and as far to the west as possible.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 2
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes June 2, 2021
Commissioner Weber asked if the lot lines will be easier to see when the development is
finished. Ms. Monson stated yes, the surface parking for the development is further
north than the adjacent buildings.
Commissioner Weber agreed with the stop light at Park Glen Road and asked about
traffic calming in the area also. Ms. Monson stated the city has a project in 2021 to
restripe the street from four to three lanes, add on-street bike lanes, and a construct
small median at 35th Street and striped pedestrian crosswalk.
Commissioner Weber stated with the Bass Lake Preserve across the street, there should
be a crosswalk. Ms. Monson agreed.
Commissioner Wilson asked, when thinking about the goals of the city and racial equity,
is there opportunity for the developer to demonstrate leadership in this area either as a
company or on this project specifically by hiring certain underrepresented groups or by
other means. Mr. Murnane stated Opus is discussing and thinking about this internally
and working on how they can be better at this in all aspects in the development. Mr.
Newins added this is part of the core values of Opus and there is an awareness and
appreciation of this issue. Mr. Callahan agreed and added Opus is making a
conscientious effort to expand and work with additional sub-contractors and create
opportunities in this area.
Commissioner Kraft asked if the improvements on Beltline will occur prior to the
development construction. Ms. Monson stated yes, the improvements will occur this
year, including a roundabout at 36th street, restriping, and completing the trail on the
west side of Beltline Boulevard.
Chair Eckholm noted the parking will be at 304 spaces, which is 20% less. Ms. Monson
stated yes, this 20% reduction allows for more flexibility for residential and commercial
tenants within the PUD ordinance.
Commissioner Tift asked about the planting requirements. He asked if there is a plan
related to the alternative planting. Ms. Monson stated typically developments do not
meet the city’s planting requirements and this development would require 250 trees
and many shrubs. She stated the city typically utilizes public art as an alternative. The
process for selecting art is typically a city and developer led process. This includes
neighborhood representatives, following city approvals as laid out in a development
agreement. She also noted the public art and the public art process are other
opportunities to include diversity and inclusion in the project.
Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing.
Lee Cannel, 4501 Park Glen Road, asked if this is a marquee development and why can
they not go higher than 10% minimum affordable that is required. The caller noted the
Bass Lake Preserve is a fragile environment and he has concerns about how the
development might affect the preserve. He asked about TIF and if the developer is
asking for that and why. He also asked if there will be a traffic light at Park Glen Road
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 3
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes June 2, 2021
and Beltline Blvd. The caller adding the developer should help pay for the light,
especially with so many people living in the area and so much traffic there also. He
asked if other developers were interested in affordable housing projects here, such as
Common Bond. He stated the developer should meet all the environmental goals of St.
Louis Park, adding we need to do better to meet the goals of the city.
Chair Eckholm stated this is a private development and the city did not seek out this
developer. He added the city is the steward and does not typically seek out other
developers; the city looks to see if the development meets the goals of the city. He
agreed he would like to see a higher percentage of affordable units as well.
Mr. Walther stated TIF is anticipated due to extraordinary development costs and a
financial gap in the feasibility of the project. In addition, because of the PUD, this
development will be required to meet the city’s green building policy and inclusionary
housing policy. He added this development meets these requirements. He also added
this development is not being asked to provide a signal at Park Glen Road. He stated the
signal is not yet warranted there. The city does plan to have one there in the future and
the timing will be triggered when there is a demonstrated need and higher volumes are
seen on the side streets. He added the city will look to fund and advance that in the
future and likely timed with the development of 4600 Beltline Blvd.
Mr. Walther added the city is looking to protect Bass Lake and will provide stormwater
treatment which will be far better than what is currently there. He stated there will be
vast improvements to the water quality and reduction in the rate stormwater is released
from this site into Bass Lake with this development.
Ms. Monson agreed with Commissioner Weber’s comments that this is a private
development and that affordable housing is also important in the city. She added the
housing policy for the city does encompass various tiers for affordability at the light rail
stations.
Commissioner Weber added the requirements of the city on housing affordability are
determined by the city council. The planning commission works on projects that include
affordability, including an application for another site in the city later in the agenda.
Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Kraft stated this is a thorough project with much research and thought.
She appreciates the live-work spaces and retail/commercial at either end and she sees
this changing more as light rail moves in. She stated she is supportive and thinks it is
very well done.
Commissioner Beneke thanked staff and the developer on this and appreciated how the
city is considering more affordability also. He stated he will support this as well.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 4
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes June 2, 2021
Chair Eckholm stated this development represents a great step for the area and this will
set the standard for the Beltline Blvd area and future developments in the area. He
stated he also will support this project.
Commissioner Weber made a motion and Commissioner Dagane seconded to
recommend approval of the development proposal for 3440 Beltline Boulevard as
presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
3b. Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment
Applicant: Sela Investments, Ltd.
Case No: 21-22-PUD
Ms. Monson presented the report.
Commissioner Beneke stated the biggest change here is the reduced number of shrubs.
Ms. Monson stated the shrubs are reduced but they are adding trees and a sidewalk to
increase the connections.
Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing.
There were no callers.
Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Kraft made a motion and Commissioner Beneke seconded to approve the
major amendment to the PUD at Parkway Residences as presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
3c. Zoning ordinance amendment pertaining to the animal handling land category
Applicant: John Kohler, representing Paster Properties
Case No: 21-23-ZA
Mr. Morrison presented the report.
Commissioner Kraft asked if any complaints have come forward in the past regarding
these kinds of businesses. Mr. Morrison stated there have been no complaints of odor
or nuisance in the past.
Commissioner Wilson noted if this were approved this would set precedent in various
developments. He noted it would introduce the use in vertical mixed-use buildings
where they haven’t been allowed before, so there may be a potential for nuisance
complaints where none were previously permitted. Mr. Morrison stated that is correct
and noted conditions were added related to size to further reduce the potential impacts
on neighbors.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 5
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes June 2, 2021
Commissioner Beneke asked how this works with a PUD and what is allowed. Mr.
Morrison stated several PUDs are already approved and this ordinance would add this
use to some of the existing PUDs and going forward in future PUDs staff would consider
including this use along with other commercial/residential uses when drafting the PUD.
Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing.
Mr. Kohler stated there is a tenant that would like to be in the Texa-Tonka shopping
center building and they would be very quiet within the development.
There were no callers.
Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing.
Chair Eckholm stated there seems to be no harm with this ordinance and he appreciated
staff working with the applicant to meet their needs but also write this to not allow for
something that the city would not want. He stated he would support this.
Commissioner Weber stated he also would support the ordinance.
Commissioner Weber made a motion and Commissioner Wilson seconded, to approve
the zoning ordinance amendment pertaining to the animal handling land category as
presented.
The motion passed 7-0.
4. Other Business
a. Rise on 7 – preliminary and final planned unit development
Ms. Kramer presented the report.
Commissioner Wilson noted concerns from residents and businesses and asked about
shadowing which has been addressed within this new plan. He asked about traffic
concerns. Ms. Kramer stated staff conducted a preliminary review of traffic. She added a
full study was not conducted as the project will not generate a level of traffic that would
trigger the need for a traffic study. She noted traffic concerns were about potential
delays of eastbound traffic on the frontage road waiting to turn left onto Texas Ave. She
noted that staff’s assessment is that this does not warrant any mitigation.
Commissioner Wilson asked about affordability in this project. Ms. Kramer stated all of
the units will be affordable to a variety of incomes ranging from 30% to 70% AMI. She
added this project exceeds the requirements of the city’s inclusionary housing policy.
Commissioner Beneke asked if there is a way to shorten the path from the development
to the light rail station. Ms. Kramer stated the main pedestrian paths will be along the
frontage road or taking Texas Avenue to Lake Street to Blake Road.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 6
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes June 2, 2021
Commissioner Weber acknowledged that part of Division Street is in Hopkins, however,
he stated he is so grateful to the developer and city staff for adding sidewalks for
connectivity. He added the frontage road will get pedestrians to Blake Road and to the
light rail. He further encouraged the city and developer to find a way to fund additional
sidewalks there to close the remaining gaps.
Mr. Walther stated the city’s Connect the Park initiative does work to address this and it
has been well-funded. He added more projects including bridges will be coming this year
in the city. He noted in the past there have been funds for random sidewalk repairs and
adding projects like this. Those funds are spoken for in the capital improvements plan
and the council is working to balance funding on the Connect the Park program with
other priorities. Mr. Walther stated because of this, there is no funding available now.
Staff will work to find a funding source, but it cannot be guaranteed.
Commissioner Weber appreciated the changes made at the development and stated he
will support it adding the traffic issues will be limited as there is no through traffic on
these streets.
Commissioner Wilson stated he appreciates this project and he thanked staff for the
presentation.
Commissioner Tift stated he is supportive of the affordable nature of this project and
asked if the daycare will be affordable as well. Ms. Kramer stated this is a priority of
Common Bond, the day care provider, the church that is selling the property, and it is a
crucial component of the project.
Mr. Michels-Allen added the general understanding with the daycare is that half the
spots will be affordable rates.
Chair Eckholm stated he supports the project as well, adding he likes the changes made
to the building. He again asked staff to please find funding for the sidewalks to help
pedestrians connect in the area, in a safe manner.
Commissioner Beneke made a motion and Commissioner Kraft seconded, to
recommend approval of the preliminary and final PUD subject to conditions
recommended by staff.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Communications
a. Appointment/introductions of new commissioners
Commissioner Wilson noted he is from Minneapolis and has lived in St. Louis Park for
over 11 years, is married with two children. He stated he is excited to be on the planning
commission and works for Mortenson in human resources working in diversity and
inclusion.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 7
Title: Planning commission meeting minutes June 2, 2021
Commissioner Tift stated he is from St. Louis Park, left and moved back. He is in the
process of buying a home and works at Horizontal Digital. His background is in
marketing and management and is looking forward to working with everyone.
Commissioner Weber stated he and Commissioner Dagane started a year ago. He added
the majority of the commission has never met in person, due to only attending online
meetings.
Mr. Walther noted the next meeting will be in two weeks, with discussions on a home
occupations ordinance for consideration and a public hearing. That meeting will be
followed by a study session introducing a new development proposal by Sherman
Associates at the future Beltline Boulevard LRT station and commissioners will debrief
about the meeting with city council on the 2021 work plan.
Mr. Walther also stated that because of the changing guidance of the Center for Disease
Control and Minnesota Department of Health, city council has asked all commissions to
return to in-person meetings in July.
He stated the first meeting in July will be cancelled and the second meeting in July will
be the first in person meeting in over a year. He added he will send an email with
guidance to the commission.
6. Adjournment – 8:11 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Sean Walther, liaison Matt Eckholm, chair member
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Discussion item: 5a
Executive summary
Title: Appointment to Environment and Sustainability Commission
Recommended action: Motion to appoint JD Moore to the Environment and Sustainability
Commission for a term beginning on July 15, 2021 and ending May 31, 2022.
Policy consideration: Not applicable
Summary: Board members are appointed to 3-year terms on the Environment and
Sustainability Commission, beginning May 31 of each year. Vacancies may occur upon the
resignation of a board member. If appointed, JD Moore will fill a position being vacated on July
15, 2021 on the Environment and Sustainability Commission with a term ending on May 31,
2022. Following appointment by the council, JD Moore will receive notification of the
appointment.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build
social capital through community engagement.
Supporting documents: None
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant
Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Public hearing: 6a
Executive summary
Title: Angel Food LLC dba Angel Food/FrioFrio – on-sale intoxicating liquor license
Recommended action: Mayor to open public hearing, take public testimony, and close public
hearing. Motion to approve application from Angel Food LLC dba Angel Food/FrioFrio for an on-
sale intoxicating liquor license located at 8100 Minnetonka Blvd.
Policy consideration: Does the applicant meet the requirements for the issuance of an on-sale
intoxicating and on-sale Sunday liquor license?
Summary: Angel Food LLC dba Angel Food/FrioFrio has submitted an application for an on-sale
intoxicating and on-sale Sunday liquor license for the property located at 8100 Minnetonka
Blvd. Angel Food/FrioFrio will be another mainstay in the re-developed Texa-Tonka shopping
center and will be occupying the other space that sits along the center common area. The
interior space has a total of 3,120 square feet and seating for up to 44 guests. Additionally, 500
square feet of outdoor space will be open for up to 24 patrons.
Katherine Gerdes will be the sole owner and manager of Angel Food/FrioFrio and has held
ownership in Angel Food since 2012. The bakery, previously located in Minneapolis, will
continue to offer made from scratch sweet treats and food, but will be expanding the menu to
include alcohol infused frozen menu items. These items will feature some of Angel Food’s
signature flavors and local distilleries will be used to make the treats. The previous location did
not offer alcoholic beverages; however, the applicant has been made aware of the city’s
practices involving liquor compliance checks and was offered training assistance from our police
department.
The police department conducted a full background investigation, and nothing was discovered
that would warrant denial of the license. The application and police report are on file in the city
clerk’s office. The required notice of the public hearing was published on June 24, 2021. If the
license is approved, nothing will be issued until all requirements have been met with the city
Building and Energy department, Hennepin County, and the State Alcohol and Gambling
Enforcement Division.
Financial or budget considerations: Fees include $500 for the background investigation and
$8,950 for an on-sale intoxicating and on-sale Sunday liquor license. Pursuant to city code
provisions, the license fee will be pro-rated for the remainder of the license term.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: None
Prepared by: Chase Peterson-Etem, office assistant
Reviewed by: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Consent agenda item: 8a
Executive summary
Title: Appoint Kimberly R. Keller as city manager and approve employment agreement
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution appointing Kimberly R. Keller as city
manager subject to the terms and conditions of the employment contract.
Policy consideration: Is council in agreement with the appointment of Ms. Keller and the
contract details?
Summary: The city council interviewed Kim Keller on June 5 and 15 and directed staff on June
21 to extend an offer of employment and enter into contract discussions with Ms. Keller.
An employment agreement has been finalized for council approval. This action will formally
appoint Ms. Keller as city manager and approve the employment agreement. Listed below is a
summary of the action in the resolution:
Appointment to city manager
• Full authority as city manager to act as city manager of the City of St. Louis Park with
powers granted by state statute, city charter, city ordinance and council resolution.
• Full authority as city manager to conduct financial transactions on behalf of the city.
Employment agreement summary
• Appointment of Kimberly R. Keller as city manager, effective August 16, 2021.
• Confirming pay for city manager at $180,000 annually, based on a 2080-hour year.
• Insurance/benefits/holidays set in accordance with city policies for other exempt
employees. Professional development consistent with city policies.
• Flex leave begins with 80 hours in bank and accrual at 33 days/year.
• Car allowance $500/month.
• Confirming termination benefits.
Details are in the attached employment agreement.
Financial or budget considerations: All items are included in budget.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Employment agreement
Prepared by: Ali Timpone, interim human resources officer
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Title: Appoint Kimberly R. Keller as city manager and approve employment agreement
Resolution No. 21-____
Resolution appointing Kimberly R. Keller as city manager
and approving employment agreement
Whereas, on June 21, 2021, the city council directed staff to make an offer of
employment to Kimberly R. Keller as city manager for the City of St Louis Park, MN contingent
on an approved contract, and
Whereas, the city council recognizes they have the authority to appoint a city manager
as determined by the city charter; and
Whereas, after review and consideration, the city council wishes to appoint Kimberly R.
Keller as city manager and confer upon that position all authority granted to the position of city
manager under state statute, city charter, city ordinance, city resolution, regulations and law;
Now therefore be it resolved that the city council of the City of St. Louis Park:
1. Appoints Kimberly R. Keller to the position of city manager, with all the authority and
responsibility of the position as provided by state statute, city charter, city ordinance,
city resolution, regulations and law; and
2. Approves execution of the employment agreement (Appendix A attached), terms
effective August 16, 2021; and
3. As city manager, Ms. Keller is conferred full authority to conduct financial transactions
on behalf of the city.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council on July 6, 2021
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Title: Appoint Kimberly R. Keller as city manager and approve employment agreement
Resolution No. 21-____
Appendix A: EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _6th_ day of __July__, 2021, by and
between the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota (the
“City”), and __Kimberly R. Keller___ (the “Manager”).
IN CONSIDERATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED HEREIN, THE PARTIES
AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
1. POSITION. The City agrees to employ Kimberly R. Keller as its City Manager to
serve in accordance with state statutes, City ordinances and the Code of Ethics of the
International and Minnesota City/County Management Associations, and to perform such other
legally permissible and proper duties and functions as the City Council shall from time to time
assign. Manager’s first day of employment is anticipated to be August 16, 2021 but may be
modified by agreement of both parties.
2. PENSION PLAN. The City shall contribute to PERA as required by State law for the
Manager.
3. SALARY. The City shall pay the Manager a salary of $180,000 per year, less
applicable taxes, payable in equal installments at the same time as the City pays its other City
employees. The City and Manager agree that an initial performance review will be conducted
on the Manager after six (6) months. The City agrees to consider an increase in compensation
to the Manager dependent upon the results of the performance evaluation. After completion of
each subsequent year of this Agreement, the City may conduct an annual review of the
Manager’s performance. The base salary and/or benefits for calendar year 2023 and
thereafter, shall be set when salaries are established for other non-union employees.
4. SENIORITY. For purposes of employment benefits such as leave accrual, the
Manager will be credited with having completed 13 years of employment with the City upon
their first day of employment (earning at the 14-year level of flex leave, 33 days/year).
5. FLEX LEAVE. Effective upon the Manager’s first day of employment, the Manager
shall be credited with 80 hours of accrued flex leave. In addition, the Manager shall accrue flex
leave in accordance with the City's personnel policies, beginning at the 6th level of accruals per
policy (33 days/year).
6. HOLIDAYS. The City shall provide the Manager the same holidays as enjoyed by
other non-union employees.
7. GENERAL INSURANCE. The City shall provide the Manager the same group
hospital, medical, dental, life and disability insurance benefits as provided to all other non-
union employees.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Title: Appoint Kimberly R. Keller as city manager and approve employment agreement
8. DEFERRED COMPENSATION: The Manager may participate in deferred
compensation programs offered by the City and receive employer contributions (if eligible) on
the same basis as other non-union employees of the City.
9. DUES AND SUBSCRIPTIONS. The City shall budget and pay the professional dues
and subscriptions for the Manager which are deemed reasonable and necessary for the
Manager’s continued participation in national, regional, state and local associations necessary
and desirable for the Manager’s continued professional participation, growth and
advancement.
10. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. The City shall budget and pay necessary and
reasonable registration, travel and subsistence expenses of the Manager for professional and
official travel, meetings and occasions adequate to continue the professional development of
the Manager and to adequately pursue necessary official and other committees thereof which
the Manager serves as a member. The Manager shall use good judgment in their outside
activities so they will not neglect their primary duties to the City.
11. CIVIC CLUB MEMBERSHIP. The City recognizes the desirability of representation
in and before local civic and other organizations. The Manager is authorized to become a
member of such civic clubs or organizations as deemed appropriate by the Manager and City;
and at the City’s expense.
12. AUTOMOBILE. The Manager shall be paid a monthly allowance of $500 for use of
their personal automobile for City business.
13. GENERAL EXPENSES. The City shall reimburse the Manager reasonable
miscellaneous job-related expenses which it is anticipated the Manager will incur from time to
time when provided appropriate documentation.
14. HOURS OF WORK. It is understood the position of City Manager requires
attendance at evening meetings and occasionally at weekend meetings. It is understood by the
Manager that additional compensation and compensatory time shall not be allowed for such
additional expenditures of time. It is further understood that the Manager may absent
themselves from the office to a reasonable extent in consideration of extraordinary time
expenditures for evening and weekend meetings at other than normal working hours.
15. OUTSIDE EMPLOYMENT/CONSULTING/TEACHING. The Manager may not engage
in any other employment while employed by the City, on either a full-time or part-time basis that
creates a conflict of interest, either directly as an employee, independent contractor or through a
corporation or other entity.
16. TERMINATION BENEFITS. In the event the Manager is terminated by the City
during such time that Manager is willing and able to perform the duties of City Manager, then
in that event, the City agrees to pay the Manager at the time of receipt of their last paycheck a
lump sum cash payment equal to six months aggregate salary and to continue to provide and
pay for the benefits set forth in paragraph 7 for a period of six months following termination.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 5
Title: Appoint Kimberly R. Keller as city manager and approve employment agreement
However, in the event Manager is terminated because of their malfeasance in office, gross
misconduct, conviction for a felony, or conviction for an illegal act involving personal gain to
Manager, then the City shall have no obligation to pay the termination benefits.
If the City at any time during the employment term reduces the salary or other financial
benefits of Manager in a greater percentage than across-the-board reduction for all non-union
employees, or if the City refuses, following written notice, to comply with any other provisions
of this Agreement benefiting Manager or Manager resigns following a formal suggestion by the
City that they resign, then Manager may, at their option, be deemed to be "terminated" on the
effective date of Manager’s resignation and the Manager shall also be entitled to receive the
termination benefits set forth above.
If the Manager voluntarily resigns their position with the City, the Manager agrees to give the
City thirty (30) days advance notice. If the Manager voluntarily resigns their position with the
City, there shall be no termination pay due to the Manager.
17. INDEMNIFICATION. Employer shall defend and indemnify Employee pursuant to
Minn. Stat. §466.07 and §465.76. In addition, Employer shall defend, hold harmless, and indemnify
Employee from all torts; civil damages, penalties, and fines; violation of statutes, laws, rules, and
ordinances, provided the Employee was acting in the performance of the duties of the position.
18. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT. Nothing in this Agreement shall
prevent, limit or otherwise interfere with the right of the City to terminate the services of the
Manager at any time, for any reason, subject only to the provisions of this Agreement and
statutory requirements. Furthermore, nothing in this Agreement shall prevent, limit or
otherwise interfere with the right of the Manager to resign at any time from their position with
the City, subject only to the provisions of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution of this Agreement the day and
year stated above.
FOR THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK:
Mayor City Manager
Attest:
City Clerk (seal)
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: July 6, 2021
Action agenda item: 8b
Executive summary
Title: First reading of semi-truck parking ordinance
Recommended action: Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance regarding general parking
and set second reading for August 2, 2021.
Policy consideration: Does the council wish to have the authority to restrict semi-trucks from
parking in non-residential areas?
Summary: On May 24, 2021 the city council discussed semi-truck parking across the city during
a study session (see attached study session topic request). At the study session, the council
directed staff to produce an ordinance granting the city the authority to restrict semi-trucks
from parking in non-residential areas. This direction was in response to resident and business
concerns brought to council members.
Generally, under the current city zoning code, no motor vehicle, recreational vehicle,
commercial vehicle, or trailer can park in any residential district. There are no similar large
vehicle restrictions in areas zoned commercial, business park, industrial, office, mixed use, or
park and open space.
The draft ordinance allows the city to restrict parking for semi-trailers, truck tractors, or other
vehicles that are heavier than 12,000 pounds. The ordinance also includes vehicles whose main
function is to tow other vehicles.
New requests for truck parking restrictions will be handled by the traffic committee and the
locations of restrictions will be brought to council for consideration.
Financial or budget considerations: Implementation of truck restriction signage is estimated to
be $300 per post and will come out of the general operating budget. Signs can last on the street
for approximately 10 years. The cost to enforce these restrictions will also come out of the
general operating budget.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Draft ordinance (posted online June 23, 2021)
May 4, 2020 council report (pgs. 114 – 125)
May 24, 2021 Study session topic request (pgs. 98 – 99)
Prepared by: Ben Manibog, transportation engineer
Reviewed by: Jack Sullivan, senior engineering project manager;
Debra Heiser, engineering director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Title: First reading of semi-truck parking ordinance
Discussion
Background: On May 24, 2021 the city council discussed semi-truck parking across the city
during a study session (see attached study session topic request). At the study session, the
council directed staff to produce an ordinance granting the city the authority to restrict semi-
trucks from parking in non-residential areas. This direction was in response to resident and
business concerns brought to council members.
Existing parking restrictions: Under the current city code, no vehicle shall be parked in the
same place for more than 48 hours (Sec. 30-153). Non-trucks also shall not be parked in public
alleys while trucks can be parked for up to 30 minutes to load or unload materials (Sec. 30-155).
Under the current city zoning code, no motor vehicle, recreational vehicle, commercial vehicle,
or trailer shall be permitted to stand or park in any residential district (R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, and R-
C) that exceed any of the following (Sec. 36-162.f.1):
a)Height of 8 feet
b)Length of 22 feet
c)Empty weight of 6,500 pounds
There are no similar large vehicle restrictions in areas zoned commercial, business park,
industrial, office, mixed use, or park and open space.
Existing truck parking concerns: On May 4, 2020, the city council considered parking
restrictions along the south County Road 25 Service Road west of France Avenue (report
attached). Among other concerns, residents and business owners felt that the presence of
trucks caused safety concerns and were a nuisance.
In addition to the location mentioned above, the following locations have also been brought to
council members or staff with similar concerns in the last year.
•Oxford Rd west of Louisiana Ave
•35th St and Raleigh Ave
•North County Road 25 Service Rd east of Ottawa Ave
Existing trucking industry considerations: A 2019 MnDOT study cited several factors that
contribute to truck parking demand including:
•More trucks – In the past ten years, overall tonnage carried by trucks increased 24
percent.
•Hours of service – Increased limitations on the consecutive hours a truck driver can
drive.
•Electronic logging devices – Federal law required trucking operations to shift from a
paper to electronic logbook.
•Productivity expectations – Rising customer expectations for delivery times and an
increasingly cost competitive marketplace have pressured truck drivers’ decisions.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 3
Title: First reading of semi-truck parking ordinance
The terms of federal commercial driver licenses have several hours-of-service regulations to
ensure public safety by preventing driver fatigue. Some of the relevant restrictions include:
• An 11-hour limit within a 14 consecutive hour period
• An 8 consecutive hour driving limit with a 30-minute break required before or after this
limit
• A 10 consecutive hour break prior to any 14 consecutive hour driving period
• A 34 consecutive hour reset period each week
Due to these regulations, many drivers prefer to park their trucks near their homes and/or near
where they pickup or drop off loads. This helps maximize the amount of time they can be
driving with loads.
The farther drivers must go to find parking, the more likely they are to be near or past their
hours-of-service limit which can affect a driver’s level of alertness. Traveling greater distances
to find parking also results in more vehicle miles traveled (VMT) which also includes traffic
congestion, fuel consumption, and emissions.
Race equity considerations: There is a relatively low barrier of entry to form a small carrier
business by purchasing as few as 1 or 2 vehicles. This has led many immigrants and people from
Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) communities to start their own trucking
business. The US Department of Labor estimates that 40% of truck drivers are from BIPOC
communities. Study and outreach performed by the City of Minneapolis has shown that many
Twin Cities truck drivers are from East African immigrant communities though they have been
unable to find specific demographic information.
Enforcement considerations: City staff is investigating if vehicle weight can be identified
through commercial vehicle licensing and other methods. More detailed information is
expected to be provided to council at the second reading of the ordinance in August.
St. Louis Park ordinance: The draft ordinance allows the city to restrict parking for semi-trailers,
truck tractors, or other vehicles that are heavier than 12,000 pounds. The ordinance also
includes vehicles whose main function is to tow other vehicles.
In practice, restrictions would be similar to existing parking restrictions and would be assigned
to entire street segments or specific sides of streets.
City of Minneapolis truck restrictions: The City of Minneapolis plans to restrict some forms of
truck parking on all city streets. Specifically, their restrictions will include:
• Restricting parking for trucks with a gross vehicle weight of 12,000 pounds or more in
any residential zoning district or residential combination district, including office
residential districts
• Restricting parking for trucks with a gross vehicle weight of 26,000 pounds or more on
any street in the city.
City council meeting of July 6, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 4
Title: First reading of semi-truck parking ordinance
The ordinance was approved by their council Transportation & Public Works Committee on
June 23, 2021. The ordinance is expected to be approved by their full city council by the end of
fall. An education phase for these changes will last through the end of 2021 with standard
enforcement starting January 1, 2022.
Truck parking restrictions next steps: New requests for truck parking restrictions will be
handled by the traffic committee. The traffic committee is an internal employee workgroup
who meets monthly to discuss traffic requests. The committee is made up of the engineering,
operations, police, and community development departments.
Implementing truck parking restrictions will work similar to existing parking restrictions.
Locations will be brought to council for consideration through the approval of a resolution.
Tentative schedule:
First reading of ordinance July 6, 2021
Second reading of ordinance August 2, 2021
Date of publication August 12, 2021
Date Ordinance takes effect August 27, 2021