Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021/06/21 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA JUNE 21, 2021 The St. Louis Park City Council is meeting in person at St. Louis Park City Hall, 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. in accordance with the most recent COVID-19 guidelines. Special study session 5:30 p.m. – community room Members of the public may attend the special study session meeting in person. This meeting will not be available on Comcast, web streamed or through audio listen-only format. EDA 6:20 p.m.; Regular city council meeting at 6:30 p.m. – council chambers Members of the public can attend the EDA/regular city council meeting in person or watch the meeting by webstream at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17 and HD channel 859). Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports. Members of the public who want to address the city council during the regular meeting about items on the agenda may attend the meeting in person or call the number noted below next to the corresponding item. Call when the meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. and follow instructions provided. Comments will be taken during each item in the order they are received and must relate to an item on the current city council agenda. •952.562.2886 – consent agenda items 4a-4j •952.562.2886 – item 5a – Appointment to HRC •952.562.2887 – item 6a – Consent and provide host approval for Groves Academy revenue bonds •952.562.2888 – item 6b – Slope easement vacation at 3440 Beltline Blvd. •952.562.2887 – item 8a – Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report •952.562.2888 – item 8b – Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd •952.562.2887 – item 8c – Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment •952.562.2886 – item 8d – Rise on 7 redevelopment project •952.562.2887 – item 8e – First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION – Community room Discussion item 1. 5:30 p.m. City manager recruitment discussion 6:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – council chambers 1.Call to order 2.Roll call 3.Approval of minutes 3a. EDA meeting minutes of June 7, 2021 5.Reports 5a. Extensions to preliminary development and loan agreements - Sherman Associates Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution approving the Third Amendment to the Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, city, and Sherman Associates and approving the Second Amendment to Loan Agreement relative to the Beltline Station development. Meeting of June 21, 2021 City council agenda 6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – council chambers 1.Call to order 1a. Pledge of allegiance 1b. Roll call 2.Presentations 2a. 2021 Human Rights Award presentation 2b. MN Recreation and Park Association Awards of Excellence and Tommy Johnson Award 2c. Proclamation declaring Saturday, June 26, 2021 as Wat Promwachirayan Day 2d. Recognition of donations 3.Approval of minutes 3a. City council meeting minutes of May 17, 2021 3b. Special study session meeting minutes of May 17, 2021 3c. Special study session meeting minutes of June 5, 2021 3d. Special study session meeting minutes of June 7, 2021 4.Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar Recommended action: **Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda, or move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 4a. Adopt Resolution approving the third amendment to the preliminary development agreement between the EDA, city, and Sherman Associates relative to the Beltline Blvd Station Redevelopment Site. 4b. • Motion to approve second reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Section 36- 268-PUD 9 of the zoning code relating to previous development approvals at 5950 36th St. W. and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. • Motion to approve second reading and adopt an Ordinance rezoning 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed-use and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 4c. Approve second reading and adopt ordinance regarding speed limits and approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4d. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of an $800 donation from Amy Priddy for Access to Fun Scholarships at Westwood Hills Nature Center, a $300 donation from Bill Kindler for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center, a $2,200 donation from Christine, Daniel, Ernest and Dick Zonneveld for the purchase of a memorial bench at Lamplighter Park honoring Ida “Edie” Zonneveld, a $2,200 donation from Niza Schear for the purchase of a memorial bench honoring Klaudia and Lejzor Przetycki, a $2,200 donation from the Luedtke family for the purchase of a memorial bench at Oak Hill Park honoring Al Luedtke, a $2,200 donation from the family and friends of Jordyn Clark for the purchase of a memorial bench at Louisiana Oaks Park honoring Jordyn Clark and a $300 donation from Stuart and Theresa Stroller for the purchase of a tree. 4e. Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $6,637.44 for project no. 4020-1101, which is the Monterey-Beltline-36th Phase 1 improvement project with Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc., Contract No. 61-20. Meeting of June 21, 2021 City council agenda 4f. Approve Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14, between the city and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for communication antennas and related equipment on the city’s water tower at 2541 Nevada Avenue (site MNL01020). 4g. Adopt Resolution authorizing the city’s participation in local performance measurement program. 4h. Adopt Resolution authorizing the distribution of an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for public review and comments. 4i. Approve for filing fire civil service commission minutes of February 9, 2021. 4j. Approve for filing planning commission minutes of May 19, 2021. 5. Boards and commissions 5a. Appointment to Human Rights Commission Recommended action: Motion to appoint Thomas Scott to the Human Rights Commission for the term ending May 31, 2022. 6. Public hearings 6a. Resolution consenting to and providing host approval for Groves Academy revenue bonds Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution consenting to and providing host approval to the issuance by the City of Mayor of its revenue obligations. 6b. Slope easement vacation at 3440 Beltline Blvd. Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony and close the public hearing. 7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – None 8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items 8a. Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report Recommended action: None at this time. This agenda item is a summary of activities undertaken by the city in 2020 to meet the city’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) requirements. 8b. Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Recommended action: • Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance vacating the slope easement along the west side of Beltline Blvd. between Park Glen Road and 35th Street West and set the Second Reading of the Ordinance for July 6, 2021 (requires five affirmative votes); • Motion to adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for Industrial Park 4th Addition (requires four affirmative votes); and • Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance adding section 36-268-PUD 20 to the zoning code and amending the zoning map from MX-1 vertical mixed-use to PUD 20 and set the second reading for July 6, 2021 (required five affirmative votes). 8c. Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Recommended action: Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 15 of the zoning code relating to previous development approvals for Parkway Residences phase III and to set the second reading for July 6, 2021. Meeting of June 21, 2021 City council agenda 8d. Rise on 7 redevelopment project Recommended action: • Motion to adopt Resolution approving the amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map, as well as related figures, tables and text (requires 5 affirmative votes); • Motion to adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for Rise on 7 Addition (requires 4 affirmative votes); • Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance adding section 36-268-PUD 19 to the zoning code and amending the zoning map from RC high-density multi-family residential to PUD 19 and set the second reading for July 6, 2021 (requires 5 affirmative votes), subject to the conditions recommended by staff to be included in the planning development contract. 8e. First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Recommended action: Motion to approve the first reading of Ordinance amending chapter 36 pertaining to the animal handling uses and set second reading for July 6, 2021. 9. Communications – None **NOTE: The consent calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a councilmember or a member of the public, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular city council meetings are carried live on civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for video on demand replays. During the COVID-19 pandemic, agendas will be posted on Fridays on the entrance doors to city hall and on the text display on civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available after noon on Friday on the city’s website. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952.924.2525. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Discussion item: 1 Executive summary Title: City manager recruitment discussion Recommended action: City council to discuss city manager interviews and make hiring decision. Policy consideration: Does council have a top candidate to whom they’d like to extend a conditional offer of employment for the city manager position? Summary: Council met with three city manager finalists for second round interviews on June 15 and June 17, 2021. Council will provide feedback on interviews and direct staff on next steps which may include extending an offer of employment to a top candidate. Supporting documents: None Prepared by: Ali Timpone, interim human resources officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Minutes: 3a . Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota June 7, 2021 1. Call to order President Brausen called the meeting to order at 6:15 p.m. 2. Roll call Commissioners present: President Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, Margaret Rog, and Jake Spano. Commissioners absent: None. Staff present: Interim Deputy City Manager (Ms. Walsh), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Interim Administrative Services Officer (Ms. Solano). 3. Approval of minutes 3a. EDA meeting minutes of April 5, 2021 It was moved by Commissioner Kraft, seconded by Commissioner Rog, to approve the EDA April 5, 2021, meeting minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. EDA meeting minutes of May 3, 2021 It was moved by Commissioner Kraft, seconded by Commissioner Mohamed, to approve the EDA May 3, 2021, meeting minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of EDA disbursements It was moved by Commissioner Kraft, seconded by Commissioner Mohamed, to approve the EDA disbursement claims for the period of April 24 - May 28, 2021. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Reports - none 6. Old business - none Economic development authority meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: EDA meeting minutes of June 7, 2021 7. New business - none 8. Communications - none 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:18 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Tim Brausen, president Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 5a Executive summary Title: Extensions to preliminary development and loan agreements - Sherman Associates Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution approving the Third Amendment to the Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, city, and Sherman Associates and approving the Second Amendment to Loan Agreement relative to the Beltline Station development. Policy consideration: Does the EDA wish to extend the Preliminary Development Agreement and loan agreement with Sherman Associates to continue joint efforts to bring the proposed Beltline Station development to fruition? Summary: On February 5, 2018, the EDA and city council approved a Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) between the EDA, city and Sherman Associates in which the parties pledged to work cooperatively together toward a mutually acceptable transit oriented development plan for the Beltline Blvd. Station Redevelopment Site. The agreement was subsequently extended on June 17, 2019 and June 15, 2020. Over the past several years, the parties have been working collaboratively on a joint development vision for the site which required the parties to work through multiple site development, infrastructure, building plan, and financial feasibility matters. The EDA/council received a staff report at the June 14, 2021 study session which reviewed the current status of the development. Given the significant progress made to date on all fronts, the parties wish to continue working toward final plans for the mixed use, mixed income development to bring it to fruition. The PDA expires June 30, 2021 unless it is extended. The parties wish to extend the PDA to June 30, 2022 (out of an abundance of caution) by which point they hope to reach a formal Purchase and Redevelopment Contract. The proposed PDA extension requires approval by both the EDA and city council. In connection with the Beltline Station development, the EDA and Sherman Associates entered into a Loan Agreement in 2019 under which the EDA loaned $3.1 million to Sherman Associates to finance acquisition of the parcel on which the future park and ride will be constructed. The Loan Agreement matures on June 30, 2021 unless extended. The proposed Second Amendment to Loan Agreement extends the maturity date for the EDA’s loan to Sherman to June 30, 2022 to match the extended date of the Preliminary Development Agreement. Financial or budget considerations: The proposed Second Amendment to Loan Agreement allows the parties to address payment of the remaining loan balance (approximately $877,500) through the anticipated purchase and redevelopment contract. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: EDA resolution Amendment documents available by contacting Comm. Dev. staff Prepared by: Greg Hunt, economic development coordinator Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager and EDA executive director Economic development authority meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 5a) Page 2 Title: Extensions to preliminary development and loan agreements - Sherman Associates EDA Resolution No. 21 - ____ EDA Resolution approving a third amendment to the preliminary development agreement between the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, the City of St. Louis Park, and Beltline Development LLC, and a second amendment to the loan agreement between the Authority and Beltline Development LLC Whereas, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1082, as amended, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) administers its Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the “Project”), for the purpose of facilitating the redevelopment of certain substandard property within the Project; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”), the Authority, and Beltline Development LLC (the “Developer”) each own portions of certain property (the “Property”) within the Project, which Property has been the subject of certain preliminary negotiations between the parties for purposes of constructing a mixed-use (multi-family residential and commercial) development on the Property and related parking, including a parking ramp serving in part as a park and ride facility for Metro Transit’s proposed Southwest Light Rail Transit Beltline station (the “Development”); and Whereas, the City, the Authority, and the Developer executed a Preliminary Development Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2018 (the “Agreement”), providing for the performance of certain activities on the part of the parties in preparation for the negotiation of a definitive Purchase and Redevelopment Contract in connection with the Property, and executed a First Amendment to the Agreement dated as of June 17, 2019, and a Second Amendment to the Agreement dated as of June 15, 2020, each extending the dates of performance of each party’s activities under the Agreement; and Whereas, pursuant to the Agreement, the Developer acquired its portion of the Property (the “Vision Bank Parcel”) from a third party, and the Authority financed a portion of the acquisition cost of the Vision Bank Parcel pursuant to a Loan Agreement between the Authority and Developer dated as of April 1, 2019 (the “Loan Agreement”), pursuant to which the Authority loaned $3,100,000 to the Developer to finance such acquisition (the “Loan”), evidenced by a promissory note (the “Note”) and secured by a mortgage on the Vision Bank Parcel (the “Mortgage”); and Whereas, the Authority approved a First Amendment to the Loan Agreement on June 15, 2020, extending the maturity date of the Loan, and the Developer provided an amended Note and Mortgage in connection with such extension; and Whereas, the parties have negotiated and now propose to execute a Third Amendment to the Agreement and a Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement to further extend the deadline for the completion of necessary preliminary activities for a period of up to twelve months. Economic development authority meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 5a) Page 3 Title: Extensions to preliminary development and loan agreements - Sherman Associates Now therefore be it resolved by the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority that the Third Amendment to the Agreement and the Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement as presented to the Board of Commissioners are hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the Third Amendment to the Agreement and Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. It is further resolved that the President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority the Third Amendment to the Agreement, the Second Amendment to the Loan Agreement, and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority, its obligations thereunder. It is further resolved that Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Board of Commissioners June 21, 2021 Tim Brausen, president Thomas K. Harmening, executive director Attest: Melissa Kennedy, secretary Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Presentation: 2a Executive summary Title: 2021 Human Rights Award presentation Recommended action: No formal action is requested. The city council is asked to join the Human Rights Commission in recognizing Perspectives, Inc. for the 2021 Human Rights Award for their work supporting women and families. Policy consideration: None at this time. Summary: The Human Rights Award recognizes individuals, groups, organizations, or businesses that have made an outstanding contribution toward increasing understanding and cooperation between people of different backgrounds in St. Louis Park. This award seeks to celebrate those in our community who have worked to advance human rights and justice within the City. Given this consideration, the St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission would like to recognize Perspective Inc. for the 2021 St. Louis Park Human Rights Award. Perspectives is a multi-service organization that creates equitable and inclusive pathways for families they serve to successfully address some of our community’s most critical social issues. Over three decades, Perspectives has developed programs to address housing stability, trauma, chemical/mental health, nutrition, and children’s development while confronting Hennepin County’s lack of equity that prevents breaking the cycle of poverty. The organization’s two- generation approach aligns with evidence-based practices and strategies specifically designed to address generational trauma. Over the decades, their programs have served to rebuild thousands of lives. Throughout this unprecedented past year, they remain committed to the belief that when a mother is empowered by the human spirit, hope within her awakens - and a cycle breaks. The St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission is honored to recognize Perspectives Inc for the 2021 Human Rights Award. Chair Virginia Mancini and Vice Chair Astein Osei of Human Rights Commission will present the award to our winners. Financial or budget considerations: None at this time. Strategic priority consideration: •St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. •St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Discussion Prepared by: Darius Gray, community organizer Reviewed by: Nichole Salaam, race equity manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 2a) Page 2 Title: 2021 Human Rights Award presentation Discussion Background: The Human Rights Award recognizes individuals, groups, organizations, or businesses that have made an outstanding contribution toward increasing understanding and cooperation between people of different backgrounds in St. Louis Park. This award seeks to celebrate those in our community who have worked to advance human rights and justice within City. Given this consideration, the St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission would like to recognize Perspectives, Inc. for the 2021 St. Louis Park Human Rights Award. Perspectives is a multi-service organization that creates equitable and inclusive pathways for families they serve to successfully address some of our community’s most critical social issues. Over three decades, Perspectives has developed programs to address housing stability, trauma, chemical/mental health, nutrition, and children’s development while confronting Hennepin County’s lack of equity that prevents breaking the cycle of poverty. The organization’s two- generation approach aligns with evidence-based practices and strategies specifically designed to address generational trauma. Perspectives takes a strength-based approach, recognizing each family member and their inherent worth, dignity, and potential. By providing a safe and supportive environment where individuals can learn from past choices and explore their strengths and possibilities, Perspectives creates an environment for change. Over the decades their programs have served to rebuild thousands of lives. Throughout this time, especially over the past year of the Covid- 19 pandemic and racial reckoning, they remain committed to the belief that when a mother is empowered by the human spirit, hope within her awakens - and a cycle breaks. Perspectives’ work and method has focused on participatory program development with participants, improving racial outcomes, and strengthening partnerships. Below, are a few examples of how those values have manifested in their day to day work: •Perspectives’ programs are designed to involve families in the creation of the policies/practices that will impact their experience while living at Perspectives. •The organization partners with ISD 283 to help parents, many of whom had traumatic experiences related to their education, work through their fears about the school system and serve as a liaison between families and the district. •Perspectives’ programs benefit from innovative relationships with the St. Louis Park fire/police departments, which work to shift the systemic racism of many policing practices and build relationships built on respect. •Perspectives works within Hennepin County’s effort to end homelessness. The organization is a strong advocate working to change the system toward equity for clients with substance use/mental health issues. Perspectives’ services are ongoing and occur in St. Louis Park, both at their housing campus and Family Center. The organization works with families to create meaningful points of access to key drivers of financial stability, wealth, and well-being that include education, childcare, transportation, health care, and employment readiness. Intervention and treatment programs for mothers are paired with early childhood development, nutrition, and academic/social- emotional enrichment programming for the children, all of which are on-site. Perspectives partners with housing/employment resources, the school system and community partners to provide critical resources for families and to advocate with and for them. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 2a) Page 3 Title: 2021 Human Rights Award presentation The Human Rights Commission would like to highlight some of Perspectives recent achievements: • Over the past five years, 84% of families in Perspectives’ supportive housing program have secured permanent housing in the community. This is significant as many of them have a long history of homelessness. • Despite the challenges of 2020, Perspectives continued to provide ongoing chemical/mental health, nutrition, and children’s services through virtual, hybrid, and in-person formats to meet the needs of the families they serve. • In late-October 2020, as part of the COVID-19 Omnibus Bonding Bill, Perspectives was awarded $4.5 million toward the expansion and renovation of their Family Center! The renovation will provide an additional 4,000 square feet toward their early childhood center and growth of their nutrition and out-of-school time programs. The HRC has selected Perspectives due to their important work within St. Louis Park and their demonstrated success with consistent, positive outcomes. Additionally, their work alignment with the HRC’s mission statement made them the best choice. The HRC sees their work as an essential asset to our community. The St. Louis Park Human Rights Commission is honored to recognize Perspective Inc. for the 2021 Human Rights Award. Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Presentation: 2b Executive summary Title: Minnesota Recreation and Park Association Awards of Excellence and the Tommy Johnson Award Recommended action: The Minnesota Recreation and Park Association board representative, Sonya Rippe, will be in attendance to present the City of St. Louis Park with four awards. Policy consideration: Not applicable. Summary: Every year, the Minnesota Recreation and Park Association (MRPA) recognizes agencies or organizations in Minnesota that set a standard of excellence in the field of recreation, parks, and leisure services. This past year there were 86 submissions for the award of excellence. The City of St. Louis Park was selected to receive the Award of Excellence for the Westwood Hills Nature Center Interpretive Center Building Project, the Aquatic Park Entrance Renovation, and Mobile Art Walks in Westwood Hills Nature Center. The City of St. Louis Park also received the 2020 Tommy Johnson Award which is given to only the best of the best of all submittals for the Westwood Hills Nature Center Interpretive Center Building Project. Awards received: ∗ Tommy Johnson Award – Westwood Hills Nature Center Interpretive Center Building Project ∗ Award of Excellence, park and facility – Westwood Hills Nature Center Interpretive Center Building Project ∗ Award of Excellence, park and facility – Aquatic Park Entrance Renovation ∗ Award of Excellence, programming and events – Mobile Art Walk at Westwood Hills Nature Center Financial or budget considerations: None at this time. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: None Prepared by: Jason T. West, recreation superintendent Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city manager/director of operations and recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Presentation: 2c Executive summary Title: Proclamation declaring Saturday, June 26, 2021 as Wat Promwachirayan Day Recommended action: Individuals representing Wat Thai of MN will attend this meeting to accept the proclamation. The mayor is asked to read and present the proclamation to those in attendance. Policy consideration: None Summary: Wat Promwachirayan (Wat Thai of MN) will be hosting a Thai Night Market and has requested that the mayor and city council declare Saturday, June 26, 2021 as Wat Promwachirayan Day. The event will take place on Saturday, June 26th, from 11 a.m. – 9 p.m. The event will offer authentic Thai food, live music, a parade, cultural performances, souvenirs, fire dancing, and dances from all over Southeast Asia. They are also celebrating the anniversary of their newfound home in St. Louis Park. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Proclamation Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant Reviewed by: Maria Solano, Interim Administrative Services Officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 2c) Page 2 Title: Proclamation declaring Saturday, June 26, 2021 as Wat Promwachirayan Day Proclamation Wat Promwachirayan Day – June 26, 2021 Whereas Wat Promwachirayan (Wat Thai of MN) will be hosting a Thai Night Market Saturday, June 26, 2021, with the sponsorship of the Royal Thai Consulate General-Chicago, the Council on Asian Pacific Minnesotans and St. Louis Park Friends of the Arts; and Whereas in its four years in St. Louis Park, Wat Promwachirayan has become a valued and important part of the fabric of the community; and Whereas the commitment of Wat Promwachirayan to the community has been exhibited through its many events that invite the public to visit the temple and learn about Thai arts, culture and heritage; and about Theravada Buddhism; and Whereas Wat Promwachirayan served as an elections polling location in 2020, hosted a virtual meditation event during the COVID-19 pandemic and partners with other community organizations and religious congregations on various initiatives and events; and Whereas Wat Promwachirayan embodies the values of St. Louis Park in its dedication to engaging and supporting people of all backgrounds in the Twin Cities through meditation, arts, cultural activities and community events; and Whereas the city wishes to recognize and celebrate the contributions of Asian American and Pacific Islanders to the community. Now, therefore be it resolved that the Mayor and City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, do hereby proclaim June 26, 2021, Wat Promwachirayan Day in the City of St. Louis Park. Wherefore, I set my hand and cause the Great Seal of the City of St. Louis Park to be affixed this 21st day of June 2021. _________________________________ Jake Spano, Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Presentation: 2d Executive summary Title: Recognition of donations Recommended action: Mayor to announce and express thanks and appreciation for the following donations being accepted at the meeting and listed on the consent agenda: From Donation For Amy Priddy $800 Access to Fun scholarships at Westwood Hills Nature Center Bill Kindler $300 Park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center Christine, Daniel, Ernest and Dick Zonneveld $2,200 Memorial bench at Lamplighter Park honoring Ida “Edie” Zonneveld Niza Schear $2,200 Memorial bench honoring Klaudia and Lejzor Przetycki Luedtke family $2,200 Memorial bench at Oak Hill Park honoring Al Luedtke Family and friends of Jordyn Clark $2,200 Memorial bench at Louisiana Oaks Park honoring Jordyn Clark Stuart and Theresa Stroller $300 Purchase of a tree Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: None Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes City council meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota May 17, 2021 1. Call to order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 1a. Pledge of allegiance 1b. Roll call Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: none Staff present: CIO (Mr. Pires), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Director of Building and Energy (Mr. Hoffman), Interim Deputy City Manager (Ms. Walsh), Interim Human Resources Officer (Ms. Timpone), Communications and Marketing Manager (Ms. Smith), Assistant Housing Supervisor (Ms. Olson), and Interim Administrative Services Officer (Ms. Solano) Guests: none 2. Presentations 2a. Recognition of donations Mayor Spano noted a $9,300 donation for two years of software and services from First Response Mental Health through their PeerConnect application for the St. Louis Park police department. 3. Approval of minutes 3a. Local board of appeal and equalization meeting minutes of April 12, 2021 It was moved by Councilmember Kraft, seconded by Councilmember Rog, to approve the April 12, 2021 meeting minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. City council meeting minutes of April 5, 2021 Councilmember Rog noted on page 10, it should read, “…after reaching out…” City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: City council meeting minutes of May 17, 2021 Councilmember Dumalag noted on the March minute corrections, it should read, “HDR is a client of RLL.” It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Rog, to approve the April 5, 2021 meeting minutes as amended. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar 4a. Approve the second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2613-21 amending Section 36-74(a) and 162(b) pertaining to fences and yard definitions for accessory structures and approve summary ordinance for publication. 4b. Moved to 8b. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 21-053 approving acceptance of software and services for two years valued at $9,360 from First Response Mental Health through their PeerConnect application for the St. Louis Park police department. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 21-054 calling for a public hearing on June 21, 2021 regarding host approval for the Groves Academy project at 3200 Highway 100 South to be financed with revenue bonds to be issued by the City of Mayer. Councilmember Brausen requested that consent calendar item 4b be removed and placed on the Regular Agenda to 8b. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to approve the agenda and items listed on the consent calendar as amended to move consent calendar item 4b to the regular agenda as item 8b; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and commissions 5a. Appointment of representatives to boards and commissions Councilmember Rog asked about alternates, appointments, and the priority list. Ms. Solano explained a person can only serve on one commission, so the first alternate would be appointed, or there would be recruitment of a new member. Councilmember Brausen stated there were alternates recommended for the three commissions he interviewed. Mayor Spano noted that Thom Miller is a former councilmember and was appointed to the housing authority. He stated Mr. Miller will not have any special influence on this commission because of his former status as a councilmember, adding this was discussed during the interview process. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: City council meeting minutes of May 17, 2021 It was moved by Councilmember Kraft, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to appoint representatives to the boards and commissions as listed in exhibit A. The motion passed 7-0. 6. Public hearings 6a. S & F Dining, LLC dba Dancing Ganesha – on -sale wine and 3.2 liquor license. Ms. Solano presented the staff report. Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano closed the public hearing. Councilmember Brausen stated this restaurant is in Ward 3 and he would appreciate Councilmember Harris making a motion. Councilmember Harris asked if this is the second location or if they are moving out of downtown. Ms. Solano stated this is their second location. Councilmember Kraft stated he is very excited for this restaurant to arrive, being he is a fan of Indian food. He noted there are several other Indian restaurants in St. Louis Park with wonderful food as well. It was moved by Councilmember Harris, seconded by Councilmember Rog, to approve application from S & F Dining, LLC dba Dancing Ganesha for an on-sale wine and on-sale 3.2 liquor license located at 8124 Hwy. 7. The motion passed 7-0. 7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – none 8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions, and discussion items 8a. Second reading of an ordinance amending St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter. Ordinance No. 2614-21 It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to adopt Ordinance No. 2614-21, amending the St. Louis Park Home Rule Charter to implement gender-neutral language in Sections 2.05, 12.02 (2), 12.18, 12.19, and 12.20 and to correct minor legal inconsistencies in Sections 3.01 and 11.03, and to approve a summary ordinance for publication. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. Mobility sharing license for Bird Rides Inc. Resolution No. 21-055 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: City council meeting minutes of May 17, 2021 Councilmember Brausen noted they will provide 50-75 scooters in May and he encouraged residents to reduce their carbon footprint by using these scooters. He asked for residents to give feedback on this program. Councilmember Kraft added Bird Rides has a license in Golden Valley and Minneapolis and he is excited to see how this goes. Councilmember Rog asked where the scooters can be used, such as on the protected bikeway on Dakota Avenue. Ms. Walsh stated yes, use on the road or the bikeway is acceptable. Councilmember Harris asked about the speed limit on the scooters and if that determines where they can drive. Ms. Walsh stated the scooters go about 15 mph and are allowed on trails and sidewalks. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mohamed, to adopt Resolution No. 21-055 approving a mobility sharing license for Bird Rides, Inc. The motion passed 7-0. 9. Communications Councilmember Rog stated it was fun to be with Councilmembers Dumalag and Kraft as well as Ms. Solano at the Wat Prom event this past Sunday. She said if folks were not able to be there, please plan on it next year. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:52 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Minutes: 3b Unofficial minutes City council special study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota May 17, 2021 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano (virtual via WebEx), Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: None. Staff present: Interim Deputy City Manager (Ms. Walsh), Interim Human Resources Office (Ms. Timpone), Interim Administrative Services Officer (Ms. Solano), and Communications and Marketing Manager (Ms. Smith) Guests: GovHR Consultant (Ms. Stevens), GovHR (Ms. Davis) 1. City manager recruitment discussion GovHR Consultant, Ms. Stevens, explained that the applications for the city manager position closed on April 23. Ms. Stevens and Ms. Davis pre-screened applicants and identified 13 candidates for the city council to review. The candidate names for the city manager position are private data pursuant to Minn. Stat. 13.43 Subd.3. Ms. Stevens and Ms. Davis presented information on the top candidates to the council. The council discussed the candidates and identified three to invite for interviews and selected an alternate. Ms. Stevens explained that candidates must agree to become a finalist before names are released publicly in the coming week. Ms. Stevens and Ms. Davis facilitated a discussion on the interview process for June 4 and June 5 at the Westwood Hills Nature Center. The council discussed an external panel of community partners. Communications/meeting check-in (verbal) This meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Minutes: 3c Unofficial minutes City council special study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota June 5, 2021 The meeting convened at 8:40 a.m. at the Westwood Nature Center. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: none Staff present: Interim Deputy City Manager (Ms. Walsh) and Interim Human Resources Officer (Ms. Timpone) Guests: GovHR Executive Search Consultant (Ms. Stevens), City Manager Finalist Candidates (Mr. Dahl, Ms. Keller, and Ms. Olson) 1. Preparation for city manager interviews Ms. Timpone and Ms. Stevens presented an overview of the interview schedule and a guide for asking effective, structured, and follow up interview questions. 2. Jeff Dahl interview Finalist Jeff Dahl was interviewed by the city council. Mr. Dahl answered the council’s structured interview questions based on his background and experience as the city manager in Wayzata, MN. 3. Kim Keller interview Finalist Kim Keller was interviewed by the city council. Ms. Keller answered the council’s structured interview questions based on her background and experience as the director of regulatory services for the City of Minneapolis. The council recessed for lunch from 12:15 p.m. – 1:00 p.m. 4. Rebecca Olson interview Finalist Rebecca Olson was interviewed by the city council. Ms. Olson answered the council’s structured interview questions based on her background and experience as the assistant city manager in Roseville, MN. 5. Discussion of candidates Ms. Stevens presented feedback gathered from staff and stakeholder panel interviews that were held on Friday, June 4, 2021 which included perceived strength areas and possible opportunities for development. Council provided their initial feedback on each candidate and City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 3c) Page 2 Title: Special study session minutes of June 5, 2021 tabled further discussion until the next special study session, scheduled for Monday, June 7, 2021. The meeting adjourned at 4:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Minutes: 3d Unofficial minutes City council special study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota June 7, 2021 The meeting convened at 8:05 p.m. in the Community Room at St. Louis Park City Hall. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: none Staff present: Interim Human Resources Officer (Ms. Timpone) Guests: GovHR Executive Search Consultant (Ms. Stevens) 1. Discussion of city manager interviews Ms. Timpone and Ms. Stevens led the council discussion of the interviews that were held with three finalist candidates for the city manager position on Saturday, June 5, 2021. The council was unable to identify a top candidate based on the interviews. Council requested to invite all finalists back for a second interview to provide greater clarity on next steps. Council directed staff to schedule second interviews and structure interviews less formally to allow for greater dialogue between council and candidates. The meeting adjourned at 8:42 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Third amendment to preliminary development agreement - Sherman Associates Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution approving the third amendment to the preliminary development agreement between the EDA, city, and Sherman Associates relative to the Beltline Blvd Station Redevelopment Site. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to extend the Preliminary Development Agreement with Sherman Associates to continue joint efforts to bring the proposed Beltline Station development to fruition? Summary: Summary: On February 5, 2018, the EDA and city council approved a Preliminary Development Agreement (PDA) between the EDA, city and Sherman Associates in which the parties pledged to work cooperatively together toward a mutually acceptable transit oriented development plan for the Beltline Blvd Station Redevelopment Site. The agreement was subsequently extended on June 17, 2019 and June 15, 2020. Over the past several years, the parties have been working collaboratively on a joint development vision for the site which required the parties to work through multiple site development, infrastructure, building plan, and financial feasibility matters. The EDA/council received a staff report at the June 14, 2021 study session which reviewed the current status of the development. Given the significant progress made to date on all fronts, the parties wish to continue working toward final plans for the mixed use, mixed income development to bring it to fruition. The PDA expires June 30, 2021 unless it is extended. The parties wish to extend the PDA to June 30, 2022 (out of an abundance of caution) by which point they hope to reach a formal Purchase and Redevelopment Contract. The proposed PDA extension requires approval by both the EDA and city council. Financial or budget considerations: No other major revisions are proposed to the PDA. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Resolution Amendment documents available by contacting Comm. Dev. staff Prepared by: Greg Hunt, economic development coordinator Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager and EDA executive director City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Page 2 Title: Third amendment to preliminary development agreement - Sherman Associates Resolution No. 21 - ____ Resolution approving a third amendment to the preliminary development agreement between the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, the City of St. Louis Park, and Beltline Development LLC Whereas, pursuant to its authority under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1082, as amended, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) administers its Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the “Project”), for the purpose of facilitating the redevelopment of certain substandard property within the Project; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “City”) and the Authority own certain property (the “Property”) within the Project, which Property has been the subject of certain preliminary negotiations with Beltline Development LLC (the “Developer”) for purposes of constructing a mixed-use (multi-family residential and commercial) development on the Property and related parking, including a parking ramp serving in part as a park and ride facility for Metro Transit’s proposed Southwest Light Rail Transit Beltline station (the “Development”); and Whereas, the City, the Authority, and the Developer executed a Preliminary Development Agreement, dated as of February 5, 2018 (the “Agreement”), providing for the performance of certain activities on the part of the parties in preparation for the negotiation of a definitive Purchase and Redevelopment Contract in connection with the Property, and executed a First Amendment to the Agreement dated as of June 17, 2019 and a Second Amendment dated as of June 15, 2020, each extending the dates of performance of each party’s activities under the Agreement; and Whereas, the parties have negotiated and now propose to execute a Third Amendment to the Agreement (the “Third Amendment”) to further extend the deadline for the completion of these preliminary activities for a period of up to twelve months. Now therefore be it resolved by the City of St. Louis Park that the Third Amendment as presented to the City Council is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the Mayor and City Manager, provided that execution of the Third Amendment by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. It is further resolved that the Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the City the Third Amendment and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by the City, and to carry out, on behalf of the City, its obligations thereunder. It is further resolved that City staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Page 3 Title: Third amendment to preliminary development agreement - Sherman Associates Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4b Executive summary Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. Recommended action: • Motion to approve second reading and adopt an Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 9 of the zoning code relating to previous development approvals at 5950 36th St. W. and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. • Motion to approve second reading and adopt an Ordinance rezoning 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed-use and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Does the city council support cleaning up the zoning ordinance to reset the baseline regulations for the property at 5950 36th St. W.? Summary: The City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (EDA) owns the site at 5950 36th St. W. In 2016, the EDA entered a preliminary redevelopment contract for the site with PLACE E-Generation One as part of a larger development proposal that also included two additional sites north of the future light rail line. On May 1, 2017, 5950 36th St. W. was rezoned to a planned unit development (PUD) to allow a 110-room hotel and an 84-unit mixed-use building. After numerous delays and an inability to secure financing for the project, the EDA did not renew the preliminary redevelopment contract for this site in 2019. In 2021, the EDA entered a new preliminary redevelopment contract for the site with Anderson Companies and Saturday Properties. This development group will be seeking zoning entitlements for the site in late 2021. To prepare the site for a new development proposal, the City of St. Louis Park would like to amend the approved PUD 9 so that it regulates only the two sites currently owned by PLACE E- Generation One. The city would also like to rezone 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed use until Anderson Companies and Saturday Properties advance their development proposal. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion; Proposed ordinance amending section 36-268-PUD 9; Summary ordinance for publication; Proposed ordinance amending the official zoning map to rezone 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1; Summary ordinance for publication; Planning commission minutes from May 5, 2021 Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. Discussion Background: The City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (EDA) owns the site at 5950 36th St. W. In 2016, the EDA entered a preliminary redevelopment contract for the site with PLACE E-Generation One as part of a larger development proposal that also included two additional sites north of the future light rail line. On May 1, 2017, 5950 36th St. W. was rezoned to a planned unit development (PUD) to allow a 110-room hotel and an 84-unit mixed-use building. After numerous delays and an inability by the developer to secure financing for the project, the EDA decided to not renew the preliminary redevelopment contract for this site in 2019. In 2021, the EDA entered a new preliminary redevelopment contract for the site with Anderson Companies and Saturday Properties. This development group will be seeking zoning entitlements for the site in late 2021. To prepare the site for a new development proposal, the EDA would like to amend the approved PUD 9 so that it regulates only the two sites owned by PLACE E-Generation One. The city would also like to rezone 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed use until Anderson Companies and Saturday Properties advance their development proposal. Site information: Site area (acres): 1.68 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. Current use: vacant commercial building Surrounding land uses: North: Wooddale LRT Station East: 1-story commercial building South: Towerlight Senior Living West: Wooddale Ave. and vacant corner lot Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning TOD - transit oriented development PUD planned unit development Proposed 2040 land use guidance Proposed zoning TOD - transit oriented development MX-1 vertical mixed use Present considerations: The EDA would like to amend section 36-268-PUD 9 of the city’s zoning ordinance to remove all language pertaining to 5950 36th St. W. The EDA would then like to rezone the site to MX-1 vertical mixed use. Zoning text amendment analysis: 5950 36th St. W., 5909 Highway 7, and 5855 Highway 7 are all regulated by section 36-268-PUD 9 of the city’s zoning ordinance. PUD 9 established four zones of development, Site A – E-Gen, which allows a anerobic digester and a greenhouse, Site B – North, which allows 217 unit multi-family building (now known as Via Sol), Site C – Hotel, which allows a 110-room hotel, and Site D – South, which allows for an 84 unit mixed-use building. PUD 9 also establishes the zoning requirements for the site and requires any development to follow the exact site plan and official exhibits that were originally approved by the city council. Since the EDA is no longer working with PLACE E-Generation One for the construction of this site, they would like to allow a new development proposal to come forward. In order to facilitate this process, the city would like to remove all language in PUD 9 referencing development on 5950 36th St. W. The proposed text amendment accomplishes this goal. Staff also recommend the greenhouse become a permitted use rather than an accessory use on Site A – E-Gen. Zoning map amendment analysis: Staff recommends rezoning 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed use to keep zoning regulations in effect at the site once all the PUD 9 language is removed. The site is guided as TOD transit-oriented development in the 2040 comprehensive plan. Rezoning the site to MX-1 would follow the vision and goals of the 2040 comprehensive plan as well as other planning studies for the area, including the Elmwood Area Land Use and Transportation Study from 2003. Additionally, most adjacent properties along 36th Street West were rezoned to MX-1 in 2019. Planning commission: The planning commission held a virtual public hearing on May 5, 2021. No comments were made by the public. The commission voiced support for a transit-oriented development district in this area to reduce the number of planned unit developments and rezoning near light rail. The commission voted 6 to 0 to recommend approval of the amendment to PUD 9 and to rezone the property to MX-1 vertical mixed use. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. City council: The city council voted 6 to 0 on June 7, 2021 to approve the applications. Next steps: The city anticipates applications from Anderson Companies and Saturday Properties to rezone the site to a new PUD in the latter half of 2021. There will be several neighborhood meetings and expect another public hearing during that process. Recommendations: Staff recommends amending section 36-268-PUD 9 of the St. Louis Park zoning code and recommends rezoning 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed use. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 9 The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 21-12-PUD). Section 2. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 9 is hereby amended by adding underscored text and deleting strikethrough text. Section breaks are represented by ***. Section 36-268-PUD 9. (a) Development Plan The site shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. PUD Exhibit 2. G001 – Cover Sheet 3. G002 – Legend 4. G003 – General Notes 5. C001 – Existing Conditions and Removals 6. C003 – Tree Removals and Preservation Plan 7. C101 – Site Plan – Overall 8 .C102 – Site Plan Northwest 9. C103 – Site Plan Northeast 10. C101 – Site Plan South 11. 10. C201 – Temporary Erosion Control Plan 12. 11. C301 – Grading and Drainage Plan – Overall 13. 12. C401 – Sanitary Sewer and Watermain 14. 13. C402 – Storm Sewer Plan 15. 14. C801 – Site Details 16. 15. C802 – Site Details 17. 16. C901 – City Std Utility Plates 18. 17. C902 – City Std Utility Plates 19. 18. C903 – City Std Utility Plates 20. 19. C904 – City Std Erosion Control Plates 21. 20. C1001 – MNDOT Std Ped Curb Ramp Details 22. 21. C1002 – MNDOT Std Ped Curb Ramp Details 23. 22. L101 – Planting Plan – Overall 24. 23. L102 – Planting Plan – Northwest 25. 24. L103 – Planting Plan – Northeast 26. L104 – Planting Plan – South 27. 25. L801 – Planting Details 28. 26. V101 – Preliminary Plat 29. 27. V102 – Preliminary Plat 30. 28. V103 – Preliminary Plat City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. 31. 29. E101 – Electrical Site Plan – Overall 32. 30. S001 – Site Plan 33. 31. A101 – North Building Floor Plans 34. 32. A102 – North Building Floor Plans 35. 33. A103 – North Building Floor Plans 36. 34. A104 – North Building Floor Plans 37. 35. A105 – North Building Floor Plans 38. 36. A106 – North Building Elevations 39. 37. A107 – North Building Illustrative Elevations 40. A201 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 41. A202 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 42. A203 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 43. A204 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 44. A205 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 45. A206 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 46. A207 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 47. A208 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 48. A209 – South Building Hotel & Residential Floor Plans 49. A210 – South Building Elevations 50. A211 – Hotel Elevations 51. A212 – South Building Illustrative Elevations 52. 38. A301 – E-Generation Floor Plans 53. 39. A302 – E-Generation Roof Plan 54. 40. A303 – E-Generation Elevations 55. A401 – 3D View 56. 41. A501 – Illustrative Sections 57. 42. A502 – Sections 58. 43. PLACE – Envelope Proposals 59. 44. PLACE – Sustainability Proposals 60. 45. PLACE – Proof of Parking 61. 46. PLACE – Lighting Proposals 62. 47. PLACE – Parking Requirements 63. 48. PLACE – Mobility Plan (Travel Demand Management Plan) The site shall also conform to the following requirements: 1) The property shall be divided into four two zones, as indicated on PUD Exhibit of the Official Exhibits. The zones shall be established by dividing the site into a northwest site, and a northeast site., a southwest site, and a southeast site. The northwest site shall be called “Site A – E-Gen”, and the northeast site shall be called “Site B – North”. the southwest site shall be called “Site C – Hotel” and the southeast site shall be called “Site D – South”. 2) Parking will be provided off-street in a surface lot, on-street, and in structured parking., and within the public plaza. The property shall be developed with 299 217 residential units, including 9918 live/work units, a 110 room hotel, a City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. minimum of 35,000 5,000 square feet of ground floor commercial space, 0.88 acres of urban forest, an e-generation energy facility, and a greenhouse. Parking will be provided off-street in a surface lot, on-street parallel parking, and structured parking. A total of four-hundred-forty-seven (447) two hundred fourteen (214) parking spaces will be provided: 202 251 spaces for residential units or 0.83 0.93 spaces per dwelling unit, 110 spaces for the hotel or 1.0 space per hotel room, 76 7 spaces for non-residential uses and 10 5 spaces for shared cars. An additional 55 spaces are required as a proof of parking as indicated on Sheet 60 45 of the Official Exhibits. Parking requirements are provided based on Sheet 62 47 of the Official Exhibits. 3) The maximum height for Site A – E-Gen shall not exceed 33 feet for the building, and 40 feet for the flute. The maximum building height for Site B – North shall not exceed 61 feet and five stories and 78 feet for the helical wind turbine. The maximum height for Site C – Hotel shall not exceed 76 feet and six stories and the maximum height for Site D – South shall not exceed 79 feet and six stories. 4) The development site shall include a minimum of 12 percent designed outdoor recreation area based on private developable land area. 5) The development shall incorporate a Travel Demand Management (TDM) plan. The details of the TDM plan shall be included in the planning development contract or as an exhibit thereto and amendments shall require city approval. including: The activities performed as specified in the TDM plan shall be reported to the city annually until December 31, 2024, and upon request by the city after that date. a. The development shall offer car-free incentives for a minimum of 90 dwelling units. b. The development shall provide 10 cars available as a car share. c. The development shall provide a local shuttle until opening day of the Southwest Light Rail Green Line Wooddale Station. d. A transportation concierge program shall be maintained. e. The development shall provide car-free perks for 90 households until the site conforms to the city’s off-street parking requirements. f. The TDM plan shall be reported to the city annually for a duration of three (3) years. (b) Site A – E-Gen 1) Permitted a. Greenhouse 1) 2) Permitted with Conditions a. Anaerobic digester. Anaerobic digesters shall be permitted only as part of a larger development which contains at least one other principal use, City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 8 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. and where electricity and bio-gas produced by the digester is used primarily by the larger development. i. Organic material, as defined in the Zoning Code, is the only input allowed. ii. No more than 3,000 tons of organic material shall be processed per year. iii. The digester system, associated equipment and operations must occur completely within a negative-pressure building. iv. Organic material shall be deposited from the delivery vehicle directly into an enclosed container integrated with the digester system. v. Sorting of material must occur in an enclosed container integrated with the digester system. vi. Odor controlling devices shall be used to prevent odors from being detectable outside of the building containing the digester system. vii. Flaring of bio-gas is only allowed to burn excess gas and shall not be visible from off-site. viii. No outdoor storage is allowed. ix. Retail distribution of compressed natural gas is not allowed. x. All necessary permits relating to items such as: emissions, solid waste processing, energy production, industrial waste water, and storm water must be obtained from the appropriate agencies. xi. All necessary contracts or agreements with material providers and utility companies must be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2) 3) Accessory Uses a. Greenhouse. b. a. Parking lots. c. b. Outdoor seating, with the following conditions: i. No speakers or other electronic devices which emit sound are permitted outside of the principal structure if the use is located within 500 feet of a residential use. ii. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. if located within 500 feet of a residential use. d. c. Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited. e. d. Solar panels i. Rooftop or building mounted systems 1. Roof or building mounted solar systems may exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district by 3 feet. ii. Ground or accessory structure mounted solar systems 1. The height of a ground or accessory structure mounted solar system, measured when oriented at maximum design tilt, shall not exceed 20 feet. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 9 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. (c) Site B – North 1) Permitted with Conditions: a. Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings, including, but not limited to the residential office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly rooms or general amenity space. b. Live-work Type I. i. All material or equipment shall be stored within an enclosed structure. ii. Operation of the home occupation is not apparent from the public right-of-way. iii. The activity does not involve warehousing, distribution or retail sales of merchandise produced off the site. iv. No person is employed at the residence who does not legally reside in the home. v. No light or vibration originating from the business operation is discernible at the property line. vi. Only equipment, machinery and materials which are normally found in the home are used in the conduct of the home occupation. vii. No more than one non-illuminated wall sign limited to two square feet in area is used to identify the home occupation. viii. Space within the dwelling devoted to the home occupation does not exceed one room or forty-five (45) percent of the floor area, whichever is greater. ix. No portion of the home occupation is permitted within any attached or detached accessory building. x. The structure housing the home occupation conforms to the building code; and in the case where the home occupation is day care or if there are any customers or students, the home occupation has received a certificate of occupancy. c. Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to the following: coffee shops, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms and studios. i. All parking requirements must be met for each use per Sheet 62 of the Official Exhibits. ii. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. iii. Restaurants are prohibited. iv. In vehicle sales is prohibited. d. Civic and institutional uses. Civic and institutional uses are limited to the following: education/academic, library, museums/art galleries, indoor public parks/open space, police service substations, post office customer service facilities, public studios and performance theaters. 2) Accessory Uses: a. Incidental repair or processing which is necessary to conduct a City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 10 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. permitted use and not to exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the associated permitted use. b. Home occupations complying with all of the conditions in the R-C district i. Except family day care is prohibited. c. Catering, if accessory to food service, delicatessen or retail bakery. d. Gardens. e. Parking lots. f. Outdoor seating, with the following conditions: i. No speakers or other electronic devices which emit sound are permitted outside of the principal structure if the use is located within 500 feet of a residential use. ii. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. if located within 500 feet of a residential use. g. No outdoor uses or storage allowed. h. Solar panels i. Roof or building mounted solar systems may exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district by 3 feet. 3) Wind Energy Conversion Systems (WECS), with the following conditions: a. Wind turbines shall be of the helical-type. b. Helical wind turbines shall meet the following design requirements i. One WECS shall be allowed per lot. ii. The WECS unit shall not exceed 17 feet in height, and shall not exceed 79 feet overall, including the building height when attached to the roof of a building. iii. The fall zone shall be completely within the property lines of the lot within which the WECS is located. iv. Minimize visual impact. WECS design and location shall minimize visual impact. v. Color and finish. All WECS shall be white, grey, black or another non-obtrusive color. Blades may be black in order to facilitate deicing. Finishes shall be matt or non-reflective. vi. Tower lighting. WECS shall not be artificially lighted, except as specified herein and to the extent required by the FAA or other federal or state law or regulation that preempts local regulations. vii. Signs and displays. The use of any portion of a WECS for displaying flags and signs, other than warning or equipment information signs, is prohibited. viii. Associated equipment. Ground equipment associated with a WECS shall be housed in a structure. Structures housing equipment shall meet the architectural design standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Control wiring and power-lines shall be wireless or underground. ix. Braking system required. All WECS shall have an automatic braking, governing or feathering system to prevent uncontrolled rotation, over speeding and excessive pressure on the structure, rotor blades and turbine components. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 11 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. x. Design height. The applicant shall provide evidence that the proposed height of the WECS does not exceed the height recommended by the manufacturer or distributor of the system. xi. Interconnection agreement. The applicant shall provide a copy of the utility notification requirements for interconnection, unless the applicant intends, and so states on the application, that the system will not be connected to the electricity grid. xii. Technology standards. WECS must meet the minimum standards of a WECS certification program recognized by the American Wind Energy Association, such as AWEA’s Small Wind Turbine Performance and Safety Standard, the Emerging Technologies program of the California Energy Commission, or other 3rd party standards acceptable to the City. xiii. Noise. Audible sound due to wind energy system operations shall comply with the standards governing noise contained in the City of St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances. xiv. If the WECS remains nonfunctional or inoperative for a continuous period of one year, the system shall be deemed abandoned and shall constitute a public nuisance. The owner shall remove the abandoned system at their expense after a demolition permit has been obtained. Removal includes the entire structure including foundations to below natural grade and transmission equipment. (d) Site C – Hotel 1) Permitted: a. Hotel. Uses associated with the hotel, including but not limited to hotel office, fitness facility, pool, parking, mail room, assembly rooms or general amenity space. 2) Permitted with Conditions: a. Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to the following: restaurants, coffee shops, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms and studios. i. All parking requirements must be met for each use per Sheet 62 of the Official Exhibits. ii. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. iii. In vehicle sales is prohibited. b. Civic and institutional uses. Civic and institutional uses are limited to the following: education/academic, library, museums/art galleries, indoor public parks/open space, police service substations, post office customer service facilities, public studios and performance theaters. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 12 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. 3) Accessory Uses: a. Incidental repair or processing which is necessary to conduct a permitted use and not to exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the associated permitted use. b. Catering, if accessory to food service, delicatessen or retail bakery. c. Parking lots. d. Outdoor seating, with the following conditions: i. No speakers or other electronic devices which emit sound are permitted outside of the principal structure if the use is located within 500 feet of a residential use. ii. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. if located within 500 feet of a residential use. e. No outdoor uses or storage allowed. f. Solar panels i. Roof or building mounted solar systems may exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district by 3 feet. (e) Site D – South 1) Permitted with Conditions: a. Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings, including, but not limited to the residential office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly rooms or general amenity space. b. Live-work Type I. i. All material or equipment shall be stored within an enclosed structure. ii. Operation of the home occupation is not apparent from the public right-of-way. iii. The activity does not involve warehousing, distribution or retail sales of merchandise produced off the site. iv. No person is employed at the residence who does not legally reside in the home except that a licensed family day care facility may have one outside employee. v. No light or vibration originating from the business operation is discernible at the property line. vi. Only equipment, machinery and materials which are normally found in the home are used in the conduct of the home occupation. vii. No more than one non-illuminated wall sign limited to two square feet in area is used to identify the home occupation. viii. Space within the dwelling devoted to the home occupation does not exceed one room or forty-five (45) percent of the floor area, whichever is greater. ix. No portion of the home occupation is permitted within any attached or detached accessory building. x. The structure housing the home occupation conforms to the building code; and in the case where the home occupation is day City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 13 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. care or if there are any customers or students, the home occupation has received a certificate of occupancy. c. Live-work Type II. i. Live-work uses as defined by Sec. 36-142 of city code are permitted on the first floor. ii. A Registration of Land Use (RLU) shall be approved by the city when there is a change in tenant. d. Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first and second floors, and are limited to the following: coffee shops, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms and studios. i. All parking requirements must be met for each use per Sheet 62 of the Official Exhibits. ii. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. iii. Restaurants are prohibited. iv. In vehicle sales is prohibited. e. Civic and institutional uses. Civic and institutional uses are limited to the following: education/academic, library, museums/art galleries, indoor public parks/open space, police service substations, post office customer service facilities, public studios and performance theaters. 2) Accessory Uses: a. Incidental repair or processing which is necessary to conduct a permitted use and not to exceed ten percent of the gross floor area of the associated permitted use. b. Home occupations complying with all of the conditions in the R-C district. c. Catering, if accessory to food service, delicatessen or retail bakery. d. Gardens. e. Parking lots. f. Outdoor seating, with the following conditions: i. No speakers or other electronic devices which emit sound are permitted outside of the principal structure if the use is located within 500 feet of a residential use. ii. Hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. if located within 500 feet of a residential use. g. No outdoor uses or storage allowed. h. Solar panels i. Roof or building mounted solar systems may exceed the maximum allowed height in the PUD zoning district by 3 feet. (d) Special Performance Standards City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 14 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. (1) All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking and screening requirements. (2) The site is exempt from the shadowing requirements specified in Section 36- 366(b)(1)g of the zoning ordinance. (3) Each commercial, civic or institutional tenant space on the ground floor facing West 36th Street shall have a direct and primary access to and from the 36th Street (south) building façade and the access shall remain open during business hours. (4) (3) All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. (5) (4) Signsages shall be allowed in conformance with the approved redevelopment plan or final PUD site plan and development agreement in accordance with the following conditions: a. Pylon signs are prohibited; b. Freestanding monument signs shall utilize the same exterior materials as the principal buildings and shall not interfere with pedestrian, bicycle or automobile circulation and visibility; c. Maximum allowable number, sizes, heights and yards for signs shall be regulated by section 36-362, MX requirements. d. Wall signs of non-residential uses shall only be placed on the ground floor and exterior walls of the occupied tenant lease space, and/or a monument sign. e. Wall signs shall not be included in calculating the aggregate sign area on the lot if they meet the following outlined conditions: 1. Non-residential wall signs permitted by this section that do not exceed seven percent of the exterior wall area of the ground floor tenant lease space. 2. The sign is located on the exterior wall of the ground floor tenant lease space from which the seven percent sign area was derived. 3. No individual wall sign shall exceed 100 square feet in area. (6) (5) Façade. a. Fibrous cement, high performance brick veneer with rain screen cladding systems, and vertically integrated photovoltaic panels shall be considered Class I Materials. b. The following façade design guidelines shall be applicable to all ground floor non-residential street-facing facades and all ground floor non- residential facades on the west façade of Site D South, including live/work type II units: 1. The minimum ground floor transparency shall be 60% at the pedestrian level. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 15 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. 2. No more than 10% of total window and door area shall be glass block, mirrored, spandrel, frosted or other opaque glass, finishes or material including window painting and signs. The remaining 90% of window and door area shall be clear or slightly tinted glass, allowing views into and out of the interior. 3. Active permitted uses, not including storage areas or utility closets, shall be maintained for a minimum depth of 15 feet. 4. Visibility into the space shall be maintained for a minimum depth of ten feet. This requirement shall not prohibit the display of merchandise. (7) (6) Awnings. a. Awnings must be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b. Backlit awnings are prohibited. Section 3. The contents of Planning Case File 21-12-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 16, 2021) Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading June 7, 2021 Second reading June 21, 2021 Date of publication July 1, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect July 16, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 16 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 9 5950 36th Street West, 5855 Hwy 7 and 5909 Hwy 7 This ordinance states that Section 36-268-PUD 9 of the zoning ordinance shall be amended to removal all language pertaining to 5950 36th Street West, and to amend the PUD to allow for a greenhouse as a permitted use rather than an accessory use. This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 1, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 17 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. Ordinance No. ___-21 An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park official zoning map, to rezone 5950 36th Street West from a planned unit development to MX-1, vertical mixed use The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 21-13-ZA). Section 2. The St. Louis Park official zoning map is hereby amended by changing the zoning district boundaries to rezone the property at 5950 36th Street West (PID 1611721340610) from PUD 9 to MX-1 vertical mixed use. The property is legally described as Lot 1, Block 3, PLACE ST LOUIS PARK, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 16, 2021) Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading June 7, 2021 Second reading June 21, 2021 Date of publication July 1, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect July 16, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 18 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 19 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION Ordinance No. ____-21 An ordinance amending the St. Louis Park official zoning map, to rezone 5950 36th Street West from a planned unit development to MX-1, vertical mixed-use This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the property at 5950 36th Street West from PUD 9 to MX-1 vertical mixed-use. This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: July 1, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 20 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. Planning commission Members present: Jim Beneke (arrived at 6:47 p.m.), Imran Dagane (arrived 6:40 p.m.), Matt Eckholm, Courtney Erwin, Jessica Kraft, Tom Weber Members absent: None Staff present: Jennifer Monson, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther Guests: Josh Bacott, Kayleen Burnett, Steve Cross, Jeri Krieg, Tom Meyer, Paul Humiston 1. Call to order – roll call 2. Approval of minutes – April 7, 2021 A motion was made by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Kraft to approve the April 7, 2021 minutes as presented. The motion passed 4-0 (Commissioners Beneke and Dagane absent). 3c. Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. Applicant: City of St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority Case No: 21-12-PUD, 21-13-ZA Ms. Monson presented the report. Commissioner Kraft asked about the rezoning and if the new developers want a PUD back on that site, so as not to rezone twice. Ms. Monson stated the developers will ask for a PUD on the property, to take full advantage of the transit-oriented development land use on the site. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Commissioner Weber asked about the need to rezone from one PUD to another, adding he invited staff to be creative with the code rather than going back and forth between PUDs. Ms. Monson stated staff contemplated how to best move forward for this site for several years, but it is a very complicated PUD with the multiple sites, so staff decided to bring this to the commission to make steps easier. Mr. Walther added staff is working on a better long-term solution going forward with a new transit-oriented development zoning district, but reiterated the complexities for this site and that this action was taken to streamline and clean up the process before moving forward with a new development proposal for the site. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 21 Title: Text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. A motion was made by Commissioner Weber, seconded by Commissioner Kraft to approve the text amendment to section 36-268-PUD 9 and rezoning of 5950 36th St. W. to MX-1 vertical mixed use. The motion passed 6-0. 3. Other business - none 4. Communications Mr. Walther stated the next meeting will bring an application at the former Prince of Peace site for a public hearing. He added city council is working to fill the vacancies on the Planning Commission and more will be known by May 17th. He stated vacancies will be filled by the June 2nd planning commission meeting. 5. Adjournment – 6:55 p.m. Sean Walther Matt Eckholm ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Matt Eckholm, chair member Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4c Executive summary Title: Second reading of ordinance regarding speed limits Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt ordinance regarding speed limits and approve the summary ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Does the council wish to implement speed limit changes on city streets as allowed by state statute and based on a safety, engineering, and traffic considerations? Summary: In May 2019, provisions passed by the Minnesota legislature gave cities increased authority to set speed limits. Over four study sessions (Mar. 2020, Aug. 2020, Jan. 2021, and May 2021), the council and staff discussed the scope, findings, and impacts of changing speed limits citywide. On June 7, 2021, the city council approved the first reading of the attached ordinance. The proposed ordinance clarifies that the city will be using the new Minnesota Statute to establish speed limits. The city engineer (engineering director) may establish speed limits based on an evaluation considering the factors specified in the statute. The ordinance and statute can only be used on roads under the city’s jurisdiction. The city does not have authority to change speed limits on county, state, or private roads. Lower vehicle speeds during a crash are less likely to lead to death or life-changing injuries. This is especially true for people walking and biking. Reducing speed limits on many St. Louis Park streets is an important tool in the city’s toolbox to create a safer transportation system. If adopted, implementation of new speed limits is expected by the end of 2021. Implementation includes speed limit signage and traffic signal retiming. Throughout the summer and fall, staff will educate community members through print and virtual media as well as through community and agency partners. Financial or budget considerations: Financial impacts relating to changing speed limits are currently estimated at $200,000. Costs include new signs, signal timing, and public outreach. The funding source is general obligation (GO) bonds. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion Draft ordinance (posted online May 28, 2021) Council meeting reports: June 7, 2021; May 24, 2021; Jan. 25, 2021; Aug. 24, 2020; Mar. 9, 2020 Prepared by: Ben Manibog, transportation engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 2 Title: Second reading of ordinance regarding speed limits Discussion Background: In May 2019, the Minnesota legislature passed a provision that gave cities increased authority to set speed limits. It went into effect on Aug. 1, 2019. The full language of the provision is provided below: Minnesota Statues, Section 169.14, Subd. 5h. Speed limits on city streets. A city may establish speed limits for city streets under the city's jurisdiction other than the limits provided in subdivision 2 without conducting an engineering and traffic investigation. This subdivision does not apply to town roads, county highways, or trunk highways in the city. A city that establishes speed limits pursuant to this section must implement speed limit changes in a consistent and understandable manner. The city must erect appropriate signs to display the speed limit. A city that uses the authority under this subdivision must develop procedures to set speed limits based on the city's safety, engineering, and traffic analysis. At a minimum, the safety, engineering, and traffic analysis must consider national urban speed limit guidance and studies, local traffic crashes, and methods to effectively communicate the change to the public. Proposed ordinance: The proposed ordinance clarifies that the city will be using the new Minnesota Statute to establish speed limits. The city engineer (engineering director) may establish speed limits based on an evaluation considering the factors in the statute above. The ordinance and statute can only be used on roads under the city’s jurisdiction. The city does not have authority to change speed limits on county, state, or private roads. Purpose: Lower vehicle speeds during a crash are less likely to lead to death or life-changing injuries. This is especially true for people walking and biking. Reducing speed limits on many St. Louis Park streets is an important tool in the city’s toolbox to create a safer transportation system. Speed limit setting goals: The following goals, to help frame setting speed limits citywide, are based on existing city policies and the new Minnesota speed limit statutes: • To support the city’s goal to eliminate fatalities and serious injuries that are a result of crashes on city streets. • To reflect the city’s goal in creating a mobility system that prioritizes walking first, then bicycling and transit, and then motor vehicle use. • To ensure the quality and function of the transportation system contributes to equitable outcomes for all people. • To support the movement of people and goods. • To be understandable, consistent, replicable, reasonable, and contextually appropriate in setting speed limits. • To clearly communicate and educate the new speed limits and their connection to safety, especially as people enter the city. Speed limit evaluation: The council was presented a full draft of the speed limit evaluation at the Jan. 25 study session (attached). The document outlines city policies, national guidance, safety research, a crash analysis, traffic evaluation, race equity and inclusion considerations, environmental considerations, conclusions, recommendations, and next steps. Updated existing and proposed speed limit maps are attached. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Page 3 Title: Second reading of ordinance regarding speed limits If the ordinance is adopted, the document will be updated for legibility and accessibility. As stated in the proposed ordinance, the evaluation will be kept on file in the engineering department and posted on the website. Implementation: If adopted, implementation of new speed limits is expected by the end of 2021. Implementation includes speed limit signage and traffic signal retiming. Throughout the summer and fall, staff will educate community members through print and virtual media as well as through community and agency partners. Ordinance No. ____-21 City of St. Louis Park Hennepin County, Minnesota Ordinance amending Chapter 30 of the St. Louis Park City Code relating to traffic and vehicles Chapter 30 of the City Code shall be amended by adding thereto a new Sec. 30-46 The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. to read as follows: Speed on city streets. The city engineer may establish speed limits for city streets under the city’s jurisdiction in accordance with the provisions set forth at Minnesota Statutes Section 169.14. A comprehensive listing and the procedures relied upon to establish speed limits under this section shall be kept on file by the city engineer, and will be made readily available for public inspection. Section 2. The Engineering Department and the City Engineer shall produce a speed limit evaluation taking into account the factors listed in Minnesota Statute Section 169.14 subd. 5h. Section 3.This Ordinance shall take effect following its passage and publication on July 16, 2021. First reading June 7, 2021 Second reading June 21, 2021 Date of publication July 1, 2021 Date Ordinance takes effect July 16, 2021 Adopted this 21st day of June, 2021, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Attest: Jake Spano, mayor Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney Page 4 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4c) Title: Second reading of ordinance regarding speed limits Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4d Executive summary Title: Accept donations to operations and recreation department Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution approving acceptance of an $800 donation from Amy Priddy for Access to Fun Scholarships at Westwood Hills Nature Center, a $300 donation from Bill Kindler for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center, a $2,200 donation from Christine, Daniel, Ernest and Dick Zonneveld for the purchase of a memorial bench at Lamplighter Park honoring Ida “Edie” Zonneveld, a $2,200 donation from Niza Schear for the purchase of a memorial bench honoring Klaudia and Lejzor Przetycki, a $2,200 donation from the Luedtke family for the purchase of a memorial bench at Oak Hill Park honoring Al Luedtke, a $2,200 donation from the family and friends of Jordyn Clark for the purchase of a memorial bench at Louisiana Oaks Park honoring Jordyn Clark and a $300 donation from Stuart and Theresa Stroller for the purchase of a tree. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept these gifts with restrictions on their use? Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. The motion noted above and the attached resolution identify the gracious donations from Amy Priddy, Bill Kindler, Christine, Daniel, Ernest and Dick Zonneveld, Niza Schear, the Luedtke family, the family and friends of Jordyn Clark, and Stuart and Theresa Stoller all of which are identified for a specific use Financial or budget considerations: These donations will be used for honorary benches, a tree, Access to Fun and Westwood Hills Nature Center park enhancements or program needs. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Stacy Voelker, senior office assistant Reviewed by: Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center manager Cynthia S. Walsh, interim deputy city mgr/ director of operations and recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Accept donations to operations and recreation department Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution approving acceptance of donations totaling $10,200 for the purchase of memorial benches and park enhancements in various parks Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by state statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor; and Whereas, Amy Priddy donated $800, Bill Kindler donated $300, Christine, Daniel, Ernest and Dick Zonneveld donated $2,200, Niza Schear donated $2,200, the Luedtke donated $2,200, the family and friends of Jordyn Clark donated $2,200 and Stuart and Theresa Stoller donated $300. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that these gifts are hereby accepted with thanks to Amy Priddy with the understanding that it must be used for Access to Fun scholarships at Westwood Hills Nature Center, to Bill Kindler with the understanding that it must be used for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center, and to Christine Zonneveld, Daniel Zonneveld, Ernest Zonneveld, Dick Zonneveld, Niza Schear, the Luedtke family and the family and friends of Jordyn Clark with the understanding they must be used for memorial benches in the parks specified and to Stuart and Thresa Stoller with the understanding it must be used for a tree in Wolfe Park. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4e Executive summary Title: Final payment resolution of Monterey-Beltline-36th Improvements, Phase 1 – Project No. 4020-1101 Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $6,637.44 for project no. 4020-1101, which is the Monterey-Beltline- 36th Phase 1 improvement project with Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc., Contract No. 61-20. Policy consideration: Not applicable Summary: On May 18, 2020, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of $586,676.30 to Thomas and Sons Construction, Inc. for the Monterey Drive Phase 1 improvement project, project 4020-1101. The first phase of this project was constructed in 2020 and included street rehabilitation, sanitary sewer forcemain replacement, roadway geometric changes, sidewalk, and signal work. The final contract amount for this project is $554,844.36, which is 5% lower than the original contract price. Details on the contract changes and quantity underruns are included in the discussion section of this report. Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor under Contract No. 61-20 has been calculated as follows: Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 586,676.30 Change Orders/ extra work +$ 31,219.97 Quantity underruns -$ 63,051.91 Final contract cost $ 554,844.36 Previous payments -$ 548,206.92 Balance due $ 6,637.44 This project was included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Funding was provided by the following sources: municipal state aid, development funds, water utility, storm utility, sanitary sewer utility and general obligation bonds (sidewalk and bikeway). Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, sr. engineering project manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 2 Title: Final payment resolution of Monterey-Beltline-36th Improvements, Phase 1 – Project No. 4020-1101 Discussion Background: This was the first phase of reconstruction along Monterey Drive. The limits of the project on phase 1 are from Excelsior Boulevard to just north of Park Commons Drive. The project was initiated to install a bikeway along Monterey Drive to connect it to the larger existing and proposed bike network in the city. During review of the existing infrastructure condition several maintenance and safety needs were identified. Additionally, the redevelopment of the Bridgewater Bank site required intersection modifications at Park Commons Drive and Monterey Drive. This work was added to the scope of this project. An overview of the project scope can be found below: •Restrict the intersection of Park Commons Drive and Monterey Drive to a three-fourths access (no left turn to northbound Monterey Drive from eastbound Park Commons Drive) •Improvements to the sidewalk adjacent to Bridgewater Bank •Improvements to the sanitary sewer forcemain •Rehabilitation of the existing pavement •Add space for on-street bike facilities- these will be installed as a part of phase 2 •Reduction from four lanes of traffic to three lanes north of Park Commons Drive •Changes to the signal system at the intersections at Excelsior Boulevard Monterey Drive to prioritize the safety of all users of the intersection with emphasis on pedestrians and bicyclists •No changes to parking restrictions There were change orders approved on the project, but the increased cost of the change orders was offset by quantity underruns and cost-saving modifications during construction. During construction, some unexpected items came up that added to the cost of the project. The additional work that was completed increased the cost of the contract by $31,219.97, resulting in a final contract amount for this project of $617,896.27. There were also quantity underruns of $63,051.91, which resulted in the final cost of the project being $554,844.36. The contract increase is attributed to the existing asphalt being thicker than the soil boring indicated. This required the contractor to use different equipment and techniques to remove the pavement. In addition, there were some field modifications necessary for the traffic signal at Excelsior Boulevard and Monterey Drive. This included updating one of the pedestrian push buttons and the removal of an obsolete signal head for eastbound Excelsior Boulevard to east bound 38th Street. The main reason the project came in under the estimated quantities was due to the work completed by Bridgewater Bank’s contractors that was originally included in the city’s contract. They installed concrete sidewalk, topsoil and sod along the segment adjacent to Bridgewater Bank reducing the overall cost of the city’s contract. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 3 Title: Final payment resolution of Monterey-Beltline-36th Improvements, Phase 1 – Project No. 4020-1101 Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor under Contract No. 60-20 has been calculated as follows: Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 586,676.30 Change orders/ extra work +$ 31,219.97 Quantity underruns -$ 63,051.91 Final contract cost $ 554,844.36 Previous payments -$ 548,206.92 Balance due $ 6,637.44 This project was included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Funding was provided by the following sources: municipal state aid, development funds, water utility, storm utility, sanitary sewer utility and general obligation bonds (sidewalk and bikeway). City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4e) Page 4 Title: Final payment resolution of Monterey-Beltline-36th Improvements, Phase 1 – Project No. 4020-1101 Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution authorizing final payment and accepting work for the Monterey-Beltline-36th Street Phase 1 improvement project City Project No. 4020-1101 Contract No. 61-20 Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1.Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated May 18, 2020, Thomas and Sons Construction Inc. has satisfactorily completed the Monterey Drive-Beltline-36th Street, Phase 1 improvement project, as per Contract No. 61-20. 2.The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work. 3.The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost is $554,844.36. 4.The City Manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $6,637.44 on this contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4f Executive summary Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Recommended action: Motion to approve Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14, between the city and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC for communication antennas and related equipment on the city’s water tower at 2541 Nevada Avenue (site MNL01020). Policy consideration: None at this time. Summary: On November 3, 2014 the city council approved the original lease agreement with New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC allowing for the placement of antennas and related equipment on the Nevada Avenue water tower. On February 23, 2016 an amendment to the agreement was made to add three additional antennas and six additional auxiliary antenna boxes. A second amendment to the agreement was approved on November 5, 2018, which added an additional six auxiliary antenna boxes. In late 2020, the city was approached by the lessee with a request to renegotiate the rental rate due to significant market variability risks resulting from emerging technologies. This third amendment modifies the rate structure that will continue to keep us on the leading edge of the market while lowering the risk for the carrier sufficiently enough for it to agree to a long-term agreement. The Amendment has been reviewed and found to be acceptable by the city attorney. Financial or budget considerations: The annual lease rate for 2023 is $99,974.67. The proposal will bring the 2024 rate to $78,332.77 with an annual escalator of 3%. This reduction effectively resets their rent to the initial contract rate and moves forward with an escalator more commonly used in the market. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 First amendment to memorandum of agreement Prepared by: Mike Okey, public works services manager Reviewed by: Mark Hanson, public works superintendent Cynthia S. Walsh, director of operations and recreation Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager 2019 Amendment - 1 - Category 3, 4, & 5 Amendment Form Market: ND / SD / NE / MN / IA Cell Site Number: MNL01020 Cell Site Name: St. Louis Park Fixed Asset Number: 10081737 THIRD AMENDMENT TO WATER TOWER ANTENNA AGREEMENT THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO WATER TOWER ANTENNA AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) dated as of the later date below is by and between City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation, having a mailing address at 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (“City”) and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address at 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30319 (“Tenant”). WHEREAS, City and Tenant entered into a Water Tower Antenna Agreement dated November 3, 2014, as amended by Amendment No. 1 to Water Tower Antenna Agreement Contract No. 126-14 dated February 23, 2016, and as amended by Amendment No. 2 to Water Tower Antenna Agreement Contract No. 126-14 dated November 5, 2018, whereby City leased to Tenant certain Premises,therein described, that are a portion of the Property located at 2541 Nevada Avenue, Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 (collectively, the “Agreement”); and WHEREAS, the term of the Agreement will expire on December 31, 2028, and the parties mutually desire to renew the Agreement, memorialize such renewal period and modify the Agreement in certain other respects, all on the terms and conditions contained herein; and WHEREAS, City and Tenant desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, City and Tenant desire to adjust the Rent in conjunction with the modifications to the Agreement contained herein; and WHEREAS, City and Tenant, desire to amend the Agreement to modify the notice section thereof; and WHEREAS, City and Tenant desire to amend the Agreement to permit Tenant to add, modify and/or replace equipment in order to be in compliance with any current or future federal, state or local mandated application, including but not limited to emergency 911 communication services; and WHEREAS, City and Tenant, in their mutual interest, wish to amend the Agreement as set forth below accordingly. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Tenant agree as follows: 1.Term. The Term of the Agreement shall be amended to provide that the current term, which commenced on January 1, 2019, shall expire on December 31, 2023 (“Current Term”), and commencing on January 1, 2024, will be automatically renewed, upon the same terms and conditions of the Agreement, for three (3) additional five (5) year terms (each a “Renewal Term”). Hereafter, “Term” shall include the Current Term and any applicable Renewal Term. The Terms will automatically renew without further action by Tenant, unless Tenant notifies City in writing of Tenant’s intention not to renew the Agreement at least sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of the Current Term or any Renewal Term. City agrees and acknowledges that, except as such permitted use or other rights may be amended herein, Tenant may continue to use and exercise its rights under the Agreement as permitted prior to the first Renewal Term. 2.Modification of Rent. Commencing on January 1, 2024, the current Rent payable under the Agreement shall be Seventy-Eight Thousand Three Hundred Thirty-Two and 77/100 Dollars ($78,332.77) per year, and shall continue during the Term, subject to adjustment, if any, as provided below. In the event of any overpayment of Rent prior to or after the Effective Date, Tenant shall have the right to deduct from any future Rent payments an amount equal to the overpayment amount. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 2 2019 Amendment - 2 - Category 3, 4, & 5 Amendment Form 3.Future Rent Increase / Annual Payments. The Agreement is amended to provide that commencing on January 1, 2025, Rent shall increase by three percent (3%) over the Rent paid during the previous year. Renewal Terms Yearly Rent Dates Rent Amount 1 January 1, 2024 to December 31, 2024 $78,332.77 January 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025 $80,682.75 January 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026 $83,103.24 January 1, 2027 to December 31, 2027 $85,596.33 January 1, 2028 to December 31, 2028 $88,164.22 2 January 1, 2029 to December 31, 2029 $90,809.15 January 1, 2030 to December 31, 2030 $93,533.42 January 1, 2031 to December 31, 2031 $96,339.43 January 1, 2032 to December 31, 2032 $99,229.61 January 1, 2033 to December 31, 2033 $102,206.50 3 January 1, 2034 to December 31, 2034 $105,272.69 January 1, 2035 to December 31, 2035 $108,430.87 January 1, 2036 to December 31, 2036 $111,683.80 January 1, 2037 to December 31, 2037 $115,034.31 January 1, 2038 to December 31, 2038 $118,485.34 4.Emergency 911 Service. In the future, without the payment of additional Rent, or any other consideration, and at a location mutually acceptable to City and Tenant, City agrees that Tenant may add, modify and/or replace equipment in order to be in compliance with any current or future federal, state or local mandated application, including but not limited to emergency 911 communication services. 5.Acknowledgement. City acknowledges that: 1) this Amendment is entered into of the City’s free will and volition; 2) City has read and understands this Amendment and the underlying Agreement and, prior to execution of this Amendment, was free to consult with counsel of its choosing regarding City’s decision to enter into this Amendment and to have counsel review the terms and conditions of this Amendment; 3) City has been advised and is informed that should City not enter into this Amendment, the underlying Agreement between City and Tenant, including any termination or non-renewal provision therein, would remain in full force and effect. 6.Notices. Paragraph 20 (H) of the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: NOTICES. All notices, requests, demands and communications hereunder will be given by first class certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, or by a nationally recognized overnight courier, postage prepaid, to be effective when properly sent and received, refused or returned undelivered. Notices will be addressed to the parties as follows. If to City: City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 If to Tenant: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Attn: TAG – LA Re: Cell Site #: MNL01020 Cell Site Name: St. Louis Park (MN) Fixed Asset #: 10081737 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE 3rd Floor City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 3 2019 Amendment - 3 - Category 3, 4, & 5 Amendment Form Atlanta, GA 30319 With a copy to: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC Attn: Legal Department Re: Cell Site #: MNL01020 Cell Site Name: St. Louis Park (MN) Fixed Asset #: 10081737 208 S. Akard Street Dallas, Texas, 75202-4206 The copy sent to the Legal Department is an administrative step which alone does not constitute legal notice. Either party hereto may change the place for the giving of notice to it by thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other as provided herein. 7.Charges. All charges payable under the Agreement such as utilities and taxes shall be billed by City within one (1) year from the end of the calendar year in which the charges were incurred; any charges beyond such period shall not be billed by City, and shall not be payable by Tenant. The foregoing shall not apply to monthly Rent which is due and payable without a requirement that it be billed by City. The provisions of this subsection shall survive the termination or expiration of the Agreement. 8.Other Terms and Conditions Remain. In the event of any inconsistencies between the Agreement and this Amendment, the terms of this Amendment shall control. Except as expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement otherwise is unmodified and remains in full force and effect. Each reference in the Agreement to itself shall be deemed also to refer to this Amendment. 9.Capitalized Terms. All capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the same meanings as defined in the Agreement. [NO MORE TEXT ON THIS PAGE - SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE] City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 4 2019 Amendment - 4 - Category 3, 4, & 5 Amendment Form IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be effective as of the last date written below. CITY: City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation TENANT: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: AT&T Mobility Corporation Its: Manager By: _________________________________By: ________________________________ Print Name: Print Name: Its: Mayor Its: Date: Date: By: _________________________________ Print Name: Its: City Manager Date: [ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS APPEAR ON THE NEXT PAGE] Area Mgr Construction & Engrg 5/27/2021 Kristan Kesler City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 5 2019 Amendment - 5 - Category 3, 4, & 5 Amendment Form CITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF _________________________) ) COUNTY OF _______________________) I CERTIFY that on ______________ _____, 202__, _______________________________ [name of representative] personally came before me and acknowledged under oath that he or she: (a)is the Mayor of City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, the corporation named in the attached instrument; (b) was authorized to execute this instrument on behalf of the corporation; and (c)executed the instrument as the act of the corporation. __________________________________________ Notary Public: _____________________________ My Commission Expires:_____________________ CITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF _________________________) ) COUNTY OF _______________________) I CERTIFY that on ______________ _____, 202__, _______________________________ [name of representative] personally came before me and acknowledged under oath that he or she: (a)is the City Manager of City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, the corporation named in the attached instrument; (b) was authorized to execute this instrument on behalf of the corporation; and (c)executed the instrument as the act of the corporation. __________________________________________ Notary Public: _____________________________ My Commission Expires:_____________________ City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 6 2019 Amendment - 6 - Category 3, 4, & 5 Amendment Form TENANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF ________________ ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ______________ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ___________________________________ is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ____________________________ of AT&T Mobility Corporation, the Manager of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: _______________________________. Notary Seal (Signature of Notary) (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) Notary Public in and for the State of ___________ My appointment expires: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 7 - 1 - PARCEL #: 08-117-21-24-0010 SPACE ABOVE FOR RECORDER’S USE THIS DOCUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY, and WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: ____________________________________________ Lease Processing (858) 799-7850 MD7, LLC 10590 West Ocean Air Drive, Suite 300 San Diego, CA 92130 Re: Cell Site #: MNL01020 Cell Site Name: St. Louis Park (MN) Fixed Asset Number: 10081737 State: MN County: Hennepin FIRST AMENDMENT TO MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT This First Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement is entered into on this ____ day of _________________, 202__, by and between City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation, having a mailing address of 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (“City”) and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, having a mailing address of 1025 Lenox Park Blvd. NE, 3rd Floor, Atlanta, GA 30319 ("Tenant"). 1.City and Tenant entered into a certain Water Tower Antenna Agreement dated November 3, 2014, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 1 to Water Tower Antenna Agreement Contract No. 126-14 dated February 23, 2016, as amended by that certain Amendment No. 2 to Water Tower Antenna Agreement Contract No. 126-14 dated November 5, 2018, and as further amended by that certain Third Amendment to Water Tower Antenna Agreement dated _________________________ ____, 202__ (collectively, the “Agreement”) for the purpose of installing, operating and maintaining a communications facility and other improvements. A Memorandum of Agreement reflecting the Agreement was recorded on May 21, 2015, as Document No. A10195660, Contract No. 126-14, in the public records of Hennepin County, State of Minnesota. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 8 - 2 - 2.The parties have agreed, commencing on January 1, 2024, to add three (3) successive periods of five (5) years each upon the same terms and conditions of the Agreement. 3.The portion of the land being leased to Tenant (the “Premises”) is described in Exhibit 1 annexed hereto. 4.This First Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement is not intended to amend or modify and shall not be deemed or construed as amending or modifying, any of the terms, conditions or provisions of the Agreement, all of which are hereby ratified and affirmed. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of this First Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement and the provisions of the Agreement, the provisions of the Agreement shall control. The Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, successors, and assigns, subject to the provisions of the Agreement. [NO MORE TEXT ON THIS PAGE - SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE] City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 9 - 3 - IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this First Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement as of the day and year first above written. CITY: City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota corporation By: ________________________________ Print Name: Title: Mayor Date: TENANT: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: AT&T Mobility Corporation Its: Manager By: ________________________________ Print Name: Title: Date: By: ________________________________ Print Name: Title: City Manager Date: [ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS APPEAR ON NEXT PAGE] Kristan Kesler Area Mgr Construction & Engrg 5/27/2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 10 - 4 - CITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF _________________________) ) COUNTY OF _______________________) I CERTIFY that on ______________ _____, 202__, _______________________________ [name of representative] personally came before me and acknowledged under oath that he or she: (a) is the Mayor of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, the corporation named in the attached instrument, (b) was authorized to execute this instrument on behalf of the corporation and (c) executed the instrument as the act of the corporation. __________________________________________ Notary Public: _____________________________ My Commission Expires:_____________________ CITY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF _________________________) ) COUNTY OF _______________________) I CERTIFY that on ______________ _____, 202__, _______________________________ [name of representative] personally came before me and acknowledged under oath that he or she: (a) is the City Manager of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, a Minnesota municipal corporation, the corporation named in the attached instrument, (b) was authorized to execute this instrument on behalf of the corporation and (c) executed the instrument as the act of the corporation. __________________________________________ Notary Public: _____________________________ My Commission Expires:_____________________ City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 11 - 5 - TENANT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT STATE OF ________________ ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ______________ ) I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that ____________________________ is the person who appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he/she signed this instrument, on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument and acknowledged it as the ____________________________ of AT&T Mobility Corporation, the Manager of New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, to be the free and voluntary act of such party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument. DATED: _______________________________. Notary Seal (Signature of Notary) (Legibly Print or Stamp Name of Notary) Notary Public in and for the State of ___________ My appointment expires: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 12 - 6 - Exhibit 1 to First Amendment to Memorandum of Agreement Legal Description Street Address: 2541 Nevada Avenue, Saint Louis Park, MN 55426 Parcel #: 08-117-21-24-0010 That certain Premises (and access and utility easements) on a portion of the real property described as follows: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Title: Lease Amendment No. 3 to City Agreement No. 126-14 with New Cingular Wireless for 2541 Nevada Ave. Page 13 Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4g Executive summary Title: Resolution authorizing the city’s participation in local performance measurement program Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the city’s participation in local performance measurement program. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to participate in the local performance measurement program for 2021? Summary: In 2010, the Legislature created the Council on Local Results and Innovation (CLRI) and charged the group with developing a voluntary performance measurement reporting program for Minnesota cities and counties. In order to participate in the program, each city or county must pass a resolution that confirms participation and implement a minimum of ten performance measures developed by the CLRI. All participants are required to file a report with the Office of the State Auditor by July 1, 2021. The report must include a resolution declaring participation in the program and a report with a minimum of ten performance measures. The city began participation in 2018. Staff have developed the tools necessary to participate in the program for 2021. If the city’s participation is approved by the council, staff will submit the attached data for 2020 and the signed resolution to the Office of the State Auditor by July 1, 2021. In order to comply with the posting requirements, the data will be available to residents on the city’s website. Financial or budget considerations: A city or county that chooses to participate in the program is eligible for a reimbursement of $0.14 cents per capita from the State. In addition, the city would also be exempt from levy limits under sections 275.70 to 275.74 for taxes payable in the following calendar year, if levy limits are in effect. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Report on performance measures for 2020 Prepared by: Maria Solano, Interim Administrative Services Officer Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager Page 2 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4g) Title: Resolution authorizing the city’s participation in local performance measurement program Resolution No. 21-____ Authorizing reporting requirements for the local performance measurement program Whereas, in 2010, the Minnesota Legislature created the Council on Local Results and Innovation; and Whereas, the Council on Local Results and Innovation developed a standard set of performance measures that will aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local elected officials in determining the efficiency of cities in providing services and measure residents’ opinion of those services; and Whereas, benefits to the City of St. Louis Park are outlined in MS 6.91 and include eligibility for a reimbursement as set by State statute; and Whereas, any city/county participating in the comprehensive performance measurement program is also exempt from levy limits for taxes, if levy limits are in effect; and Whereas, the City Council of St. Louis Park has adopted and implemented at least 10 of the performance measures, as developed by the Council on Local Results and Innovation, and a system to use this information to help plan, budget, manage and evaluate programs and processes for optimal future outcomes; and Now therefore let it be resolved that, the City Council of St. Louis Park will report the results of the performance measures to its citizenry by the end of the year through publication, direct mailing, posting on the city’s/county’s website, or through a public hearing at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed. Be it further resolved, the City Council of St. Louis Park will submit to the Office of the State Auditor the actual results of the performance measures adopted by the city. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk St. Louis Park • 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416 www.stlouispark.org • Phone: 952.924.2575 • Fax: 952.928.2662 • TTY: 952.924.2518 Report on Performance Measures for 2020 City of St. Louis Park Category # Performance Measure Data General 1. Percent change in the taxable property market value 5.80% 2. Number of nuisance code enforcement cases per 1,000 population 3.29 3. Bond Rating AAA Police Service 4. Part I and II Crime Rates Part I: 1,394 Part II: 1,051 Fire & EMS Service 5. Insurance industry rating of fire services ISO 2 6. EMS calls per 1,000 population 62.18 Streets 7. Average city street pavement condition rating 62.4 8. Expenditures for road rehabilitation per paved lane mile rehabilitated (jurisdiction only roads) $386,241.8 9. Percentage of all jurisdiction lane miles rehabilitated in the year 3.3% Water 10. Operating costs per 1,000,000 gallons of water pumped/produced $3528.14 Sanitary Sewer 11. Number of sewer blockages on city system per 100 connections .044 Page 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4g) Title: Resolution authorizing the city’s participation in local performance measurement program Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4h Executive summary Title: Beltline Station Development environmental assessment worksheet Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the distribution of an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for public review and comments. Policy consideration: Does city council support the distribution of an environmental assessment worksheet (EAW) for the Beltline Station Development in the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) Monitor? Summary: Sherman proposes to construct the following building components on the 6.6-acre site at the southeast corner of CSAH 25 and Beltline Boulevard: • Seven-story mixed-use building with six levels of market rate housing (159 units) and approximately 20,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial space, potentially anchored by a grocer. • Five-story market rate apartment building with 160 units. • Four-story all affordable apartment building with 82 units, 77 units will be available at 60% AMI and 5 units will be available at 30% AMI. 22 units will be three-bedrooms. • 362-stall parking ramp, which is proposed to include 268 park and ride stalls, 79 commercial parking stalls and approximately 2,000 square feet of retail/commercial space. • Sustainable features including on and off-site solar, green space, plazas, and public art will be incorporated throughout the development. The development will adhere to the city’s green building policy. Kimley-Horn prepared an EAW for the development per Minnesota Rules. The EAW examines the potential for environmental impacts of the proposed project. Projects determined through the EAW process to have the potential for significant negative environmental effects must do further environmental review in the form of an environmental impact statement (EIS). The city council received a written report regarding the EAW and a summary of the proposed development on June 14, 2021. Approving the distribution of the EAW does not constitute any type of approval by the council of the project. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable for the EAW. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion Site plan Resolution Beltline Station Development website Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Baron, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4h) Page 2 Title: Beltline Station Development environmental assessment worksheet Discussion Background: In July 2017, the EDA conducted a formal request for proposals process to solicit transit-oriented development proposals for the Beltline Station Development. The EDA determined Sherman Associates’ proposal most closely aligned with the city’s vision, development objectives and preferred programming for the site. Subsequently, the EDA entered into a preliminary development agreement to redevelop the site in a manner that will achieve the city’s goals. Present considerations: Sherman Associates proposes to develop the Beltline Station Development in two phases. Phase I includes: • Building 1 is a seven-story mixed-use building with 6 levels of market rate housing (159 units) and approximately 20,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial space, potentially anchored by a grocer. It would be constructed at the southeast corner of CSAH 25 and Beltline Boulevard • A 362-stall parking ramp, including 268 park and ride stalls for the SWLRT, 79 stalls for commercial parking stalls and approximately 2,000 square feet of retail/commercial space. • Building 2 is a five-story market rate apartment building with 160 units to be constructed east of the parking ramp. Phase II includes: • Building 3 is a four-story, 82-unit apartment building to be constructed in the northeast corner of the redevelopment site fronting CSAH 25. All the units in this building would be affordable with 77 units available to households at 60% AMI and five units would be available to households at 30% AMI. This building would feature 67 (82%) two bedrooms units or larger. 22 units (27%) are three bedrooms. The average unit floor area is 1,029 square feet. Altogether, the proposed redevelopment will have 401 apartment units of which 319 (80%) will be market rate and 82 (20%) would be affordable for 25 years. The housing units will include a combination of studios, alcoves, and one, two and three bedrooms. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4h) Page 3 Title: Beltline Station Development environmental assessment worksheet Proposed site plan Environmental assessment worksheet: The Beltline Station Development proposal is a mixed residential and commercial development that falls into the State of Minnesota’s mandatory EAW categories for both residential developments and mixed residential and commercial developments. Kimley-Horn prepared an EAW for the Beltline Station Development per Minnesota Rules. The EAW examines the potential for environmental impacts of the proposed project. Projects determined through the EAW process to have the potential for significant negative environmental effects must do further environmental review in the form of an environmental impact statement (EIS). The City of St. Louis Park is the responsible government unit (RGU) for review of the EAW. Staff requests city council approve a resolution authorizing distribution of the EAW. The EAW will be distributed to the required list of jurisdictions and agencies, as well as will be sent to the EQB Monitor on June 29, 2021. The city will also publish a legal notice of the EAW comment period in the Sun Sailor and post the EAW on the city website. The city council will be asked to consider a resolution regarding the record of decision and a declaration on the need for an EIS once the EAW is reviewed and comments are answered. These actions do not obligate the city council to future approval of the proposed development. The EAW examines the potential for environmental impacts of the proposed project including: a detailed project description, review of required permits, analysis of land use and zoning, overview of geology, soils, topography, water resources, contamination and hazardous materials, ecological resources, historic properties, visual effects, air emissions, noise, and transportation. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4h) Page 4 Title: Beltline Station Development environmental assessment worksheet The announcement of the availability of the draft EAW must be published in the EQB Monitor, a weekly publication, and provide a 30-day review and comment period that begins on the date of publication. Next steps: Staff requests city council adopt the attached resolution and staff will submit the EAW for publication in the EQB monitor on June 29, 2021 and distribute to required agencies for review. Once the 30-day comment period is complete and comments are responded to, city council will be asked to approve a resolution for EAW findings and declaration of whether further environmental review is necessary. None of these actions obligate the city council to future approval of the proposed development. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4h) Page 5 Title: Beltline Station Development environmental assessment worksheet Resolution No. 21-____ Approving distribution of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet in the Environmental Quality Board Monitor and to required agencies for review Whereas, Sherman Development Associates, LLC (“Proposer”) proposes to redevelop approximately seven acres in St. Louis Park to create 401 new residential units and up to 32,000 square feet of ground floor commercial at the Beltline Station Development; and Whereas, the site is located in the southeast quadrant of CSAH 25 and Beltline Blvd.; and Whereas, the project crosses the threshold of a mandatory EAW by having a total of more than 375 attached units per Minn. Rules 4410.4300, subpart 19.C Residential Development and Minn. Rules 4410.4300, subpart 32 Mixed residential and industrial-commercial projects; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is the Responsible Governmental Units (“RGU”); and Whereas, the EAW was prepared by Kimley-Horn on behalf of the Proposer, who submitted completed data portions of the EAW to the City of St. Louis Park consistent with Minn. Rules Part 4410.1400; and Whereas, the EAW was prepared using the form approved by the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board for EAWs in accordance with Minn. Rules 4410.1300. Now therefore be it resolved that the city council does hereby approve the distribution of an Environmental Assessment Worksheet in the Environmental Quality Board Monitor and to required agencies for review in accordance with Minn. Rules 4410.1500. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4i Official minutes Fire civil service commission February 9, 2021 – 8:30 a.m. Members present: Commissioners William MacMillan, Bob Tift and Stuart Williams Members absent: None Staff present: Fire Chief (Mr. Koering), Union President (Mr. Bolinger), Deputy Fire Chief (Mr. Wolff), Assistant Fire Chief (Mr. Smith), HR Manager (Ms. Timpone), and IT Technician (Mr. Heddle) Guests: None 1. Call to order President Williams called the commission to order at 8:30 am. 2. Approval of minutes – Fire Civil Service Commission of October 30, 2020 Minutes were approved as distributed. 3. Selection of Secretary It was moved by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by President Williams, to appoint Commissioner Tift as secretary of the commission. In a roll call, the motion passed 2-0-1 with Commissioner Tift abstaining. 4. Fire Lieutenant Eligibility Roster Deputy Chief Wolff presented the Fire Lieutenant promotional process, explaining that the applicants completed an essay application, simulation, promotability index, and panel interview, all weighted equally. All six candidates who applied achieved scores at 70 and above to be placed on the eligibility roster. It was moved by Commissioner Tift, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to accept the 2021 Fire Lieutenant Eligibility Roster as presented. In a roll call, the motion passed 3-0. 5. Other Business Chief Koering stated that there was no annual report this year due to COVID-19 but that would be available soon in electronic format similar to last year. Ms. Timpone notified the commission that City Manager Tom Harmening and Deputy City Manager Nancy Deno are both retiring in the coming months. 6. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:44 am. ______________________________________ Ali Timpone, liaison Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4j Official minutes Planning commission May 19, 2021 – 6 p.m. Members present: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Courtney Erwin, Jessica Kraft, Tom Weber Members absent: none Staff present: Jacquelyn Kramer, Sean Walther Guests: Jim Vos, Sara Riegle, Asher Michels-Allen, Ryan DuPuis 1.Call to order – roll call 2.Approval of minutes – May 5, 2021 Commissioner Beneke noted he was listed as both absent and present in the minutes. Mr. Walther stated a correction will be made to note his time of arrival to the meeting under the list of people present and delete his name from the absent list. Commissioner Kraft made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kraft, to approve the minutes as amended. The motion passed unanimously. 3.Hearings 3a. Rise on 7 Applicant: CommonBond Communities Case No: 21-16-CP, 21-17-5, 21-18-PUD Ms. Kramer presented the report. Commissioner Weber asked if on the north side the entrance is off the frontage road vs. Highway 7, and turns could be made right or left. Ms. Kramer stated yes, that is correct. Commissioner Weber asked if the reason there is no access off Division Street is related to increased traffic on the quieter road. Ms. Kramer stated yes, adding the site grading and access to the level of structured parking also contributed to the proposed driveway locations. Commissioner Weber asked how pedestrians would walk to Knollwood and if there is a way to make it safer to walk across Highway 7 at this intersection. Mr. Walther pedestrians should cross at Texas Avenue or Blake Road signaled intersections. He stated there are no plans for additional upgrades at those intersections. There have been improvements at the Blake Road and Texas Avenue intersections in the past few years and the city successfully advocated for preserving the existing pedestrian crossings, while Minnesota Department of Transportation has considered closing some crosswalks. Page 2 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Title: Planning commission meeting minutes May 19, 2021 Commissioner Weber stated he does have a concern about this intersection, especially if the city wants to be a walkable city. He also wanted to be sure there is a way to get to the bus stop and there are sidewalks available for pedestrians to access. Chair Eckholm agreed adding it is important to have sidewalks to the light rail station for pedestrians. He encouraged the city to add Division Street to the Connect the Park plan as soon as possible so there is access for folks living in this new development and for safety purposes as well. Commissioner Kraft agreed as well and stated it is important these connections are made. She also asked about the daycare and how the shared parking and drive-up lanes would work for pick up and drop off. Ms. Kramer stated several spaces would be signed for daycare pick up and drop off. Commissioner Dagane asked how many units are affordable. Ms. Kramer stated all the units will be affordable to people ranging in income from 30% of the area median income (AMI) up to 70% AMI and there would be a mix of affordability for all the different types of apartment units. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. Caleb Rollins, 4003 Wooddale Avenue, stated his support for the project. He noted two congregations came together to do this project and wanted to make sure this development was affordable and also had the daycare component. He stated the congregation supports this and hoped the commission will do what needs to be done to get the project through. Donna Christiansen, 1422 Division Street, asked about parking on Division Street. The caller noted that Division Street is a snow emergency road. Mr. Walther stated he is not sure who is handling snow removal on Division Street since it is on the border of Hopkins and St. Louis Park. He stated St. Louis Park has exceptions to snow emergencies when there is on-street parking adjacent to multi-family residential uses, and plows pass through later and coordinate with property managers. He added those parking stalls might not be needed. Ms. Christiansen stated current residents do park there. She asked about the daycare and apartment play areas and if they are fenced in to protect children from going onto Division Street. She has concerns about traffic coming in and out of the complex and how the city will handle this. She stated there will be more traffic in that area. She asked what percentages are for the AMI, and she asked if this is section 8 housing, which will impact the neighborhood. Ms. Kramer stated both playground areas are fenced in. Mr. Michels-Allen, the applicant representative, stated currently the breakdown of AMI is 19 units at 30%, 35 units at 40%, 15 units at 50%, 30 units at 60% and 21 units at 70%, however he said that is likely to change a bit. Page 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Title: Planning commission meeting minutes May 19, 2021 Bill Milanko, stated his family has owned the property at 8215 Highway 7 since 1971, noting it is currently occupied by Yardbird Furniture. He stated he is concerned about shadowing, which is more than allowed by city code. He asked for reduction of the height of the building or revisions to the building location. He stated he also has concerns about parking and noted the on-street overflow parking will run 600 feet along the frontage road and is twice the frontage allowed and will overwhelm the area with traffic concerns. He also stated his other concerns are related to visibility of his property, due to increased parking and landscaping. He stated his property relies heavily of highway traffic, noting they already lost 50% of access when Blake Road intersection was redeveloped and now will lose another 50% from landscaping. He asked the commission to please consider this. Barry Wong, 1424 Division Street, stated he has concerns about on-street parking on Division Street along with concerns about traffic and turning left, going northbound. His parking concerns also involve pedestrian safety, and this has not been properly addressed. He stated it is a lot of cars and traffic to add and the conditions of those living there now has not been taken into consideration. William Bigley, 1821 Highway 7, has similar concerns. He is the owner of the building here and is in favor of affordable housing. He noted the eastbound traffic here will be a problem, on Highway 7 and Texas, which is already a clogged intersection. He added pedestrians have no sidewalk on Division that goes to Blake Road. He noted he is in favor of a pedestrian and traffic study here also, which is not being pursued by city staff. He stated this is a good development, but with traffic, access and stacking will make it difficult for his business. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Commissioner Weber stated he does take the callers concerns to heart. He noted the concerns about shadows and trees, and the consideration of where trees are planted should be noted as well as sidewalk placement in the future. He stated the concerns about traffic and cars could be addressed by adding sidewalks to make it a more accessible area and noted the city can encourage less cars parking if sidewalks are added and more pedestrian access created. He encouraged the commission and staff to look further at these issues. Commissioner Kraft stated she had concerns about the shadowing also and has not heard the applicant discuss changing the massing of the building. She stated this is a valid concern from the owner and in the report and should be addressed. Commissioner Beneke agreed with the commissioners and stated the lack of access to Blake Road is also concerning, especially since it is so close to the LRT. He stated this should be addressed with Hopkins as well and could be discussed with council. Chair Eckholm stated he agrees with the recommendations and that there are still some items to iron out. He stated he is supportive of the development and wants to be sure they are a good neighbor. He recommended there be sidewalks added in this area and Page 4 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Title: Planning commission meeting minutes May 19, 2021 that they be included in the Connect the Park program soon. He noted the caller that mentioned landscaping and he asked if the type of landscaping could be reviewed further in order to minimize blocking the visibility of the business here. He encouraged staff to look into this with the applicant. Commissioner Weber made a motion, and Commissioner Kraft seconded, to recommend approval of the comprehensive plan amendment and preliminary and final plat, with conditions recommended by staff. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Weber made a motion, and Commissioner Beneke seconded, to table action on the preliminary and final PUD pending hearing back from the applicant on the items noted above. The motion passed unanimously. 4.Other Business - none 5.Communications Mr. Walther noted the June 2 meeting will have a development proposal, a PUD amendment, and an application from a business owner to amend zoning code text, and potentially the item tabled this evening. He thanked Commissioner Erwin for her years on the commission, noting she will be moving away. Commission Erwin complimented staff on their good work and wished everyone well in the future. Mr. Walther congratulated Commissioner Eckholm and Kraft for their reappointments and added two new commissioners were appointed to cover two vacancies. He noted they will join at the June 2 meeting. He stated the commission will begin meeting in person again in July. 6.Adjournment - 7:07 p.m. Sean Walther Matt Eckholm ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Matt Eckholm, chair member Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Discussion item: 5a Executive summary Title: Appointment to Human Rights Commission Recommended action: Motion to appoint Thomas Scott to the Human Rights Commission for the term ending May 31, 2022. Policy consideration: Not applicable Summary: Board members are appointed to 3-year terms on the Human Rights Commission, beginning May 31 of each year. Vacancies may occur upon the resignation of a board member. If appointed, Thomas Scott will fill a vacant position on the Human Rights Commission with a term ending on May 31, 2022. Following appointment by the council, Thomas Scott will receive notification of the appointment. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: None Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant Reviewed by: Maria solano, interim administrative services officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Public hearing: 6a Executive summary Title: Resolution consenting to and providing host approval for Groves Academy revenue bonds Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution consenting to and providing host approval to the issuance by the City of Mayor of its revenue obligations. Policy consideration: Should the city allow Groves Academy to issue revenue obligations thru the City of Mayor? Summary: Groves Academy would like to finance the renovation, improvement, and equipping of the Borrower’s independent co-educational day school facilities located at 3200 Highway 100 South in the City, refund the Issuer’s outstanding Educational Facility Revenue Bonds (Groves Academy Project), Series 2014B, the proceeds of which were used to finance and refinance the renovation, expansion, construction, improvement, and equipping of the Academy (the “Original Project” and, together with the Renovation Project the “Project”), and finance the costs of issuing the bonds. Groves Academy would like the bonds to be designated as tax-exempt obligations (or bank- qualified) which, under the IRS code, cannot exceed $10 million in a calendar year. Since the city already used the bank-qualified exemption on bonds issued this year, Groves Academy found another city (Mayor) that had not used their bank-qualified exemption. The city of St. Louis Park has provided host approvals for similar circumstances in the past. The city of St. Louis Park is still required to hold a public hearing since the project is in the City of St. Louis Park. By using the bank-qualified exemption from the city of Mayor it will provide some interest rate savings to Groves Academy. Financial or budget considerations: All out-of-pocket expenses of the city will be covered by Groves Academy. The bonds will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the city and will not be secured by or payable from any property or assets of the city and will not be secured by or payable from any property or assets of the city and will not be secured by any taxing power of the city. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Kennedy and Graven (bond attorney) summary letter Prepared by: Melanie Schmitt, Chief Financial Officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 6a) Page 2 Title: Resolution consenting to and providing host approval for Groves Academy revenue bonds Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution giving consent to the issuance of educational facility revenue bonds under Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.152 through 169.165 (Groves Academy project) Be it resolved by the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “City”) as follows: Section 1. General Recitals. The purpose of Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.165, as amended (the “Act”), is, among other things, to promote the welfare of the State of Minnesota (the “State”) by the active attraction and encouragement and development of economically sound industry and commerce to prevent so far as possible the emergence of blighted and marginal lands and areas of chronic unemployment. Section 2. Description of the Project. (a) Groves Academy, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation and 501(c)(3) organization (the “Borrower”), has proposed that the City of Mayer, Minnesota (the "Issuer"), issue revenue obligations, in one or more series (the "Note"), under the Act, in order to finance the Project (defined below), in the approximate aggregate principal amount not to exceed $6,800,000. (b) The Borrower proposes to use the proceeds of the Note to (i) finance the renovation, improvement, and equipping of the Borrower’s independent co-educational day school facilities (the “Academy”) located at 3200 Highway 100 South in the City (the “Renovation Project”), (ii) refund the Issuer's outstanding Educational Facility Revenue Note (Groves Academy Project), Series 2014A, and Educational Facility Revenue Note (Groves Academy Project), Series 2014B, the proceeds of which were used to finance and refinance the renovation, expansion, construction, improvement, and equipping of the Academy (the “Original Project” and, together with the Renovation Project, the “Project”), and (iii) finance the costs of issuing the Note. The Project is owned, operated, and managed by the Borrower. (c) The City has been advised that the Note or other obligations, as and when issued, will not constitute a charge, lien or encumbrance upon any property of the City or the Issuer, except the Project and the revenues to be derived from the Project. Such Note or obligations will not be a charge against the general credit or taxing powers of the City or the Issuer, but are payable from sums to be paid by the Borrower pursuant to a revenue agreement. Section 3. Recital of Representations Made by the Borrower. The Borrower has agreed to pay any and all costs incurred by the City in connection with the issuance of the Note, whether or not such issuance is carried to completion. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 6a) Page 3 Title: Resolution consenting to and providing host approval for Groves Academy revenue bonds Section 4. Public Hearing. (a)As required by the Act and Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), a Notice of Public Hearing was published in the City’s official newspaper and newspaper of general circulation, for a public hearing on the proposed issuance of the Note and the proposal to undertake and finance the Project. (b)As required by the Act and Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council has on this same date held a public hearing on the issuance of the Note and the proposal to undertake and finance the portion of the Project located within the jurisdictional limits of the City, at which all those appearing who desired to speak were heard and written comments were accepted. Section 5. Host Approval. The City Council hereby gives the host approval required under Section 147(f) of the Code and, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 471.656, Subdivision 2(2), the City Council hereby consents to the issuance of the Note by the Issuer. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member _______________, and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following City Council Members voted in favor thereof: And the following City Council Members voted in opposition: Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Fifth Street Towers 150 South Fifth Street, Suite 700 Minneapolis, MN 55402 (612) 337-9300 telephone (612) 337-9310 fax kennedy-graven.com Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity Employer JULIE A. EDDINGTON Attorney at Law Direct Dial (612) 337-9213 Email: jeddington@kennedy-graven.comJune 14, 2021 Melanie Schmitt, Chief Financial Officer City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Re: Resolution providing host approval for a project to be financed and refinanced with the proceeds revenue obligations to be issued by the City of Mayer Dear Melanie, As you know, Groves Academy, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation (the “Borrower”), proposes to (i)finance the renovation, improvement, and equipping of the Borrower’s independent co-educational day school facilities (the “Academy”) located at 3200 Highway 100 South, St. Louis Park, Minnesota (the “Renovation Project”); and (ii) refund the outstanding Educational Facility Revenue Bonds (Groves Academy Project), Series 2014A, and Educational Facility Revenue Bonds (Groves Academy Project), Series 2014B, issued by the City of Mayer, Minnesota (the “City of Mayer”), the proceeds of which were used to finance and refinance the renovation, expansion, construction, improvement, and equipping of the Academy (the “Original Project,” and together with the Renovation Project, the “Project”). The Borrower has requested that the City of Mayer, as the issuer of the bonds issued in 2014, issue one or more series of revenue obligations (the “Bonds”) in the estimated maximum principal amount of $6,800,000 and loan the proceeds thereof to the Borrower to finance the Project. In order for the City of Mayer to issue the Bonds, the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”) must grant “host approval” to the issuance of the Bonds, following a duly noticed public hearing, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.152 through 469.1655, as amended, and the regulations promulgated under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Enclosed is a resolution for consideration by the City Council on June 21, 2021, following the public hearing, for purposes of granting host approval to the issuance of the Bonds by the City of Mayer. The proposed Bonds will be issued as conduit revenue bonds of the City of Mayer secured solely by the revenues derived from the loan or other revenue agreements executed by the Borrower and from other security provided by the Borrower. The Bonds will not constitute a general or moral obligation of the City, will not be secured by or payable from any property or assets of the City, and will not be secured by any taxing power of the City. The Bonds will not be subject to any debt limitation imposed on the City and the issuance of the Bonds will not have any adverse impact on the credit rating of the City, even in the event that the Borrower encounters financial difficulties with respect to the Project. The issuance of the Bonds by the City of Mayer will not affect the general obligation bonds previously issued by the City this year or the City’s ability to issue additional general obligation bonds or conduit revenue bonds in calendar year 2021. The Borrower will pay the out-of-pocket expenses of the City with respect to this transaction. Page 4 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 6a) Title: Resolution consenting to and providing host approval for Groves Academy revenue bonds Offices in Minneapolis Saint Paul St. Cloud Error! Unknown document property name. Please contact me if you have questions regarding the foregoing. Sincerely, Julie Eddington Page 5 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 6a) Title: Resolution consenting to and providing host approval for Groves Academy revenue bonds Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Public hearing: 6b Executive summary Title: Slope easement vacation at 3440 Beltline Blvd. Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony and close the public hearing. Policy consideration: Is the slope easement needed for a public purpose? Summary: In 1986 the city obtained a 20-foot slope easement on 3440 Beltline Boulevard along the west side of Beltline Boulevard. The easement was obtained to raise the grade of the road when Beltline Boulevard was reconstructed and connected through to Highway 7. Opus Group proposes a new development at 3440 Beltline Blvd. The proposal includes a five- story, 250-unit mixed-use building with 7,450 square feet of commercial space and six live/work units on the ground floor fronting Beltline Boulevard. Due to high ground water and floodplain, parking is proposed to be provided in a three-story above ground ramp and in a 28-stall surface parking lot. The housing will include 10% of the units affordable at 50% area median income (AMI), which meets the city’s inclusionary housing policy requirements. Several three-bedroom units are included in the proposal to assist in city council’s goals for family-sized housing. Opus Group proposes a vacation of the slope easement. The proposed development at 3440 Beltline would put the building at grade with Beltline Boulevard, thus eliminating the need for a slope easement along this property line. Based on the proposed plan, there is no longer a public purpose for the slope easement. City staff recommend vacating the slope easement as described and depicted in the slope easement vacation exhibits attached to this report. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Slope easement exhibit Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 6b) Page 2 Title: Slope easement vacation at 3440 Beltline Blvd. Slope easement vacation exhibit City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 6b) Page 3 Title: Slope easement vacation at 3440 Beltline Blvd. Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Action agenda item: 8a Executive summary Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report Recommended action: None at this time. This agenda item is a summary of activities undertaken by the city in 2020 to meet the city’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) requirements. Policy consideration: Does the city council have questions regarding the city’s stormwater pollution prevention program? Summary: The City of St. Louis Park has an approved permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) for the discharge of stormwater from the city’s storm sewer system into waters of the state, such as Minnehaha Creek. This permit is required based on an amendment to the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Clean Water Act (CWA) and the creation of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). St Louis Park, along with over 200 other Minnesota cities, are permitted as MS4 communities. As a part of the permit requirements each year, the City of St. Louis Park conducts a review of our SWPPP to ensure program compliance, the appropriateness of best management practices (BMPs), and progress towards achieving the goals identified in the SWPPP. To document this review a summary is presented to the council ahead of the submittal of our annual report to the MPCA on June 30. The city’s SWPPP and annual report are located on the city’s stormwater management webpage along with a link to submit questions or comments about the program. There will also be a public meeting presenting the city’s stormwater program activities SWPPP held on August 12, 2021 at the Westwood Hills Nature Center. Comments received at this meeting and at other times during the year will be part of the 2021 annual report. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable at this time. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. Supporting documents: Discussion 2020 SWPPP Stormwater Activity Highlights 2021 SWPPP Stormwater Initiatives Prepared by: Erick Francis, water resources manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director; Phillip Elkin, senior engineering project manager Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report Discussion Background: The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit establishes conditions for discharging stormwater into waters of the state. Operators of regulated small MS4s are required to design their Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) to: •Reduce the discharge of pollutants to the “maximum extent practicable” (MEP); and •Protect water quality; and •Satisfy the appropriate water quality requirements of the Clean Water Act. The EPAs Phase II Rule defines a small MS4 stormwater management program as a program comprising six elements that, when implemented in concert, are expected to result in significant reductions of pollutants discharged into receiving water bodies. The SWPPP is broken out into six program elements, termed Minimum Control Measures (MCMs). These are: MCM 1 Public Education and Outreach Distributing educational materials and performing outreach to inform citizens about the impacts polluted stormwater runoff discharges can have on water quality. MCM 2 Public Participation/Involvement Providing opportunities for citizens to participate in program development and implementation, including effectively publicizing public hearings and/or encouraging citizen representatives on a stormwater management panel. MCM3 Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Developing and implementing a plan to detect and eliminate illicit discharges to the storm sewer system (includes developing a system map and informing the community about hazards associated with illegal discharges and improper disposal of waste). MCM 4 Construction Site Runoff Control Developing, implementing, and enforcing an erosion and sediment control program for construction activities that disturb 1 or more acres of land (controls could include silt fences and temporary stormwater detention ponds). MCM 5 Post-Construction Runoff Control Developing, implementing, and enforcing a program to address discharges of post- construction stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment areas. Applicable controls could include preventative actions such as protecting sensitive areas (e.g., wetlands) or the use of structural BMPs. MCM 6 Pollution Prevention/Good Housekeeping Developing and implementing a program with the goal of preventing or reducing pollutant runoff from municipal operations. The program must include municipal staff training on pollution prevention measures and techniques (e.g., regular street sweeping, reduction in the use of pesticides or street salt, or frequent catch-basin cleaning). Implementation of the MEP standard will typically require the development and implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) and the achievement of measurable goals to satisfy each of the six MCMs. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report BMPs are practices, techniques, and measures that prevent or reduce water pollution from nonpoint sources by using the most effective and practicable means of achieving water quality goals. BMPs include, but are not limited to, official controls, structural and nonstructural controls, and operation and maintenance procedures. As a part of the permit requirements each year, the City of St. Louis Park conducts a review of our SWPPP to determine program compliance, the appropriateness of best management practices (BMPs), and progress towards achieving the goals identified in the SWPPP. To document this review, we submit an annual report to the MPCA by June 30 of each calendar year. The city’s SWPPP and annual report are located on the city’s stormwater management webpage. The information requested by the MPCA in the report is meant to provide the basis for an assessment of the appropriateness of the BMPs and the progress that has been made toward achieving the identified goals for each of the MCMs. This assessment is based on results collected and analyzed from inspection findings and public input received during the reporting period. The city is required to provide the public with opportunities to offer input on the adequacy of the SWPPP. In addition to presenting a report to the council, city staff is active on city publications, social media, and events promoting the stormwater management program, as well as having a dedicated public meeting each year, which will be held at the Westwood Hills Nature Center on August 12, from 6:00 to 7:00 PM. Staff is always continuing to review and refine our program to reduce pollutants from entering our surface waters and the associated record-keeping procedures. One of the initiatives for 2020 was to prepare for the re-issuance of the MS4 general permit, which is anticipated to be reissued later in 2021. City staff is committed to implementing the SWPPP and maintaining a high level of compliance. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program 2020 Activities Summary The following outlines the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) Minimum Control Measure (MCM) activities completed in 2020. These MCMs are included in the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). MCM‐1: Public education and outreach activities Permit requirement: Permittees shall develop and implement a public education program and distribute educational materials that inform the public of the impact stormwater discharges have on water bodies and that include actions citizens, businesses, and other local organizations can take to reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater. The program shall include the following: Activities completed: •High-priority stormwater-related issue for 2020 o Rainwater Rewards Program Installed 43 rain gardens and 2 rain barrels Received $16,800.00 in grant funding from the Clean water Land and Legacy Amendment •Distributed other stormwater management related educational materials o Participated in the Adopt-A-Drain Program (141 participants and 279 adopted drains) o Stormwater and environmental education at Westwood Hills Nature Center (17,239 attendees) o Publish 11 stormwater articles in Park Perspective, City Manager’s Digest, Park and Recreation Guide, and Sun Sailor o 2 articles in the City Manager’s Digest o Stormwater information on city’s website (3,741 clicks) o Social media outreach on stormwater management 34 postings o Annual Rain Barrel sale (sold 156 barrels, for the 7th year in a row, at a 50% discounted rate for residents) o Held the Metro Blooms Resilient Yard Workshop, Turf Alternative Workshop, and Healthy Soils Workshop (total of 127 attendees) MCM‐2: Public involvement and participation Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement a public participation/involvement program to solicit public input on the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Page 4 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report Activities completed: •June 22, 2020- Provided stormwater annual report to city council •Fall 2020- posted a series of 6 Facebook posts pertaining stormwater management and the city ’s SWPPP •December 10, 2020 – held a virtual public meeting (1 attendee) MCM‐3: Illicit discharge detection and elimination Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges into the city’s storm sewer system. Activities completed: •Observed 18 illicit discharges and responded with verbal warnings and letters of warning on illicit discharge •Identified and monitored industrial and commercial areas within the city that have an elevated potential for illicit stormwater discharges •Implemented a comprehensive training program for city field staff •Distributed illicit discharge detection and elimination social media information MCM‐4: Construction site stormwater runoff control Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement and enforce a construction site stormwater runoff control program that reduces pollutants in stormwater runoff related to construction activity. Activities completed: •Performed 43 plan reviews and erosion control permits issues •Performed 187 site on 45 sites •Collected damage deposits for erosion control permits to aid in maintaining compliance o Issued 22 notices of violation for noncompliance, including verbal and written warnings, to bring sites back into compliance. MCM‐5: Post‐construction runoff control Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement and enforce a post-construction stormwater management program that prevents or reduces water pollution after construction activity is completed. Activities completed: •Implement stormwater best management practices as part of the 2020 Pavement Management Project, including: o Install 3 SAFL baffle and sump manholes Page 5 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report o Reduction in impervious surfaces (approximately 3%) •Provided stormwater management plan review for 12 projects o BMPs included 6 underground stormwater facilities, 2 rain gardens, 1 biofiltration basin, 3 SAFL baffle and sump manholes MCM‐6: Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations Permit requirement: Permittees shall develop and implement an operations and maintenance program that prevents or reduces the discharge of pollutants from permittee owned and operated facilities. Activities completed: •Completed Klodt Pond and Beltline Boulevard Drainage Study •Inspected 124 storm sewer outfalls •Inspected 57 stormwater ponds •Inspected 23 stormwater management best practices •Swept over 1,294 miles of streets and alleys o Removed approximately 6,997 cubic yards of material from city streets •Inspected Municipal Service Center stockpile and storage areas quarterly •Provide stormwater management training to city staff •Worked with Operations to evaluate existing policies and practices and to look for areas to improve process and reduce pollution Page 6 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program 2021 Activities The following outlines the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program (SWPPP) Minimum Control Measure (MCM) activities planned for 2021. These MCMs are included in the City of St. Louis Park’s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit issued by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA). MCM‐1: Public education and outreach activities Permit requirement: Permittees shall develop and implement a public education program and distribute educational materials that inform the public of the impact stormwater discharges have on water bodies and that include actions citizens, businesses, and other local organizations can take to reduce the discharge of pollutants to stormwater. The program shall include the following: Activities to initiate: •Select high-priority stormwater-related issue o Rainwater Rewards Program Partner with Metro Blooms and Conservation Corps of Minnesota to provide additional funding and technical assistance for the installation of 40 residential rain gardens •Continue Adopt-a-Drain program in collaboration Clean Water Minnesota •Continue to promote stormwater pollution prevention throughout the city, including: o Partner with Clean Water Minnesota Outreach Program o Park Perspective articles o Social media postings o Partner with other cities, watershed and/or other organization’s activities and workshops o Continue Westwood Hills Nature Center educational programs MCM‐2: Public involvement and participation Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement a public participation/involvement program to solicit public input on the Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Activities to initiate: •Hold public open house to receive comments on SWPPP MCM‐3: Illicit discharge detection and elimination Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement and enforce a program to detect and eliminate illicit discharges into the city’s storm sewer system. Page 7 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report Activities to initiate: •Continue illicit discharge detection and elimination program o Continue inspections o Update mapping o Provide city field staff training for illicit discharges o Continue to educate public about illicit discharges MCM‐4: Construction site stormwater runoff control Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement and enforce a construction site stormwater runoff control program that reduces pollutants in stormwater runoff related to construction activity. Activities to initiate: •Continue erosion control site plan review, site inspection and enforcement •Continue to educate city staff and the public about the importance of construction stormwater management and erosion and sediment control MCM‐5: Post‐construction runoff control Permit requirement: Permittees shall implement and enforce a post-construction stormwater management program that prevents or reduces water pollution after construction activity is completed. Activities to initiate: •Continue to review plans and work with local watersheds to maintain compliance MCM‐6: Pollution prevention/good housekeeping for municipal operations Permit requirement: Permittees shall develop and implement an operations and maintenance program that prevents or reduces the discharge of pollutants from permittee owned and operated facilities. Activities to initiate: •Review future projects and identify potential stormwater best management practices that would reduce runoff and improve water quality on local street projects •Continue routine inspections and maintenance practices (i.e., street sweeping, storm sewer inspection, and maintenance work) in 2021 •Continue the use of Cartegraph and GIS mapping in 2021, to assist with tracking inspections, findings and recommendations Page 8City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Annual Storm Water Pollution Prevention Program report Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Action agenda item: 8b Executive summary Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Recommended action: •Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance vacating the slope easement along the west side of Beltline Blvd. between Park Glen Road and 35th Street West and set the Second Reading of the Ordinance for July 6, 2021 (requires five affirmative votes); •Motion to adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for Industrial Park 4th Addition (requires four affirmative votes); and •Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance adding section 36-268-PUD 20 to the zoning code and amending the zoning map from MX-1 vertical mixed-use to PUD 20 and set the second reading for July 6, 2021 (required five affirmative votes). Policy consideration: Does city council support the proposed development? Summary: Opus Group proposes a new development at 3440 Beltline Blvd. The proposal includes a five-story, 250-unit mixed-use building with 7,450 square feet of commercial space and six live/work units on the ground floor fronting Beltline Boulevard. Due to high ground water and floodplain, parking will be provided in a three-story above ground ramp and in a 28- stall surface parking lot. The housing will be mixed income, with 10% of the units affordable at 50% area median income (AMI), meeting the city’s inclusionary housing policy requirements. Although the application is not subject to the newest provisions of the recently amended policy, it does include several three-bedroom units to assist in city council’s goals for family- sized housing. The applicant applied for a slope easement vacation, a preliminary and final plat, and a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). A PUD is a zoning map and zoning text amendment to create a new zoning district specific to the property. Financial or budget considerations: There are extraordinary costs associated with the proposed redevelopment site that prevent the proposed project from being financially feasible. Consequently, the developer applied for tax increment financing (TIF) to help close the financial gap. Staff and the economic development authority’s (EDA) financial consultant, Ehlers, is reviewing the TIF request and will bring a recommendation to the EDA in the coming months. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion; Zoning map amendment exhibit; Vacation ordinance; Plat resolution; PUD ordinance; June 2, 2021 draft planning commission minutes; Official exhibits; Site renderings; Traffic study; Beltline Station area framework and design guidelines Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 2 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Discussion Background: 3440 Beltline Blvd. has long been held by the McCain family. During their ownership tenure, this area has undergone many changes from industrial, to a business park, and then in 2019 this site’s land use was re-guided to transit-oriented development and the site was rezoned to MX-1 vertical mixed-use. The McCain family anticipated these changes and all of their tenants’ leases expire on or before June 30, 2021. The McCain family entered into a purchase agreement with Opus Group who wishes to redevelop the site into a mixed-use, mixed-income, transit-oriented development, which achieves the city’s goals and vision for the site based on the city’s plans for the area. In 2012, the city created the Beltline Station area framework and design guidelines which identified Beltline Boulevard as a transit-oriented street since it is the primary north-south link for all transportation to the Beltline LRT Station and connects the LRT station to the Wolfe Park area. The plan states that development along Beltline Boulevard should “…focus on higher density buildings that bring more people, residents and employees, to live and work within walking distance of the Beltline Transit Station. Taller buildings for office, residential, and mixed-use (residential or office above retail) are appropriate along Beltline Boulevard/Ottawa [Avenue South]. All buildings on properties adjacent to Beltline Boulevard should be street- oriented with minimal building setbacks, entry doors and windows along the street.” Site information: Site area (acres): 3.94 acres City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 3 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Current use: Business park uses, Surrounding land uses: former Kenwood Gymnastics site North: Business park uses East: Bass Lake Preserve South: Business park uses, Comcast offices and fitness studios West: Business park uses, Steel Toe Brewery Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning TOD - transit oriented development MX-1 vertical mixed use Floodplain Proposed zoning PUD planned unit development Floodplain Present considerations: The applicant requests the city: 1.Vacate an existing slope easement along the west side of Beltline Boulevard. 2.Approve a preliminary and final plat to create one developable lot and dedicate additional right-of-way along Beltline Boulevard and alley right-of-way on the west side of the lot. 3.Amend the zoning map and zoning ordinance to rezone the subject properties from MX- 1 vertical mixed-use to PUD - planned unit development. Slope easement vacation: In 1986 the city obtained a 20-foot slope easement on 3440 Beltline Boulevard along the west side of Beltline Boulevard. The easement was obtained to raise the grade of the road when Beltline Boulevard was reconstructed and connected through to Highway 7. Opus Group requests the city vacate the slope easement. The proposed development at 3440 Beltline Blvd. would put the building at grade with Beltline Boulevard, thus eliminating the need for a slope easement along this property line, and there would be no public purpose for the slope easement. Staff and planning commission support vacating the slope easement described and depicted in the ordinance attached to this report. Preliminary and final plat analysis: Opus Group seeks preliminary and final plat approval for the proposed redevelopment of a 250-unit, mixed-use building at 3440 Beltline Blvd. Lots: Lot 1, Block 1, Beltline Industrial Park 4th Addition will have a lot area of 162,289 square feet or 3.73 acres. The proposed residential density for the site is 67 units per acre. Right-of-way dedication: The city is installing a multi-use trail along the west side of Beltline Boulevard in summer 2021. The property line will be relocated to one foot away from the trail providing a clearer demarcation between what is publicly and privately owned. 5,219 square feet (0.12 acres) of right-of-way will be dedicated along Beltline Boulevard. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified a future alley connection along the west side of the property from 35th Street West to Park Glen Road. Seven feet measured from the alley centerline, which City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 4 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. is half of the required alley right-of-way width, will be dedicated as part of the plat. The alley dedication is 4,224 square feet or 0.097 acres. Total right-of-way dedication is 9,443 square feet or 0.217 acres. Easements: Drainage and utility easements are provided along all property lines as per the requirements of the city’s subdivision ordinance. The plat provides a four-foot wide drainage and utility easement along Beltline Boulevard and a five-foot wide easement along the dedicated alley along the west property line. All other drainage and utility easements abutting city right-of-way are ten feet wide. Staff finds the preliminary and final plat meet city requirements. PUD analysis: Description: The developer requests approval of a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). A PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment that establishes the regulations for a specific property. The site is currently zoned MX-1 vertical mixed-use. Building and site design analysis: 3440 Beltline Blvd. meets the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the city to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 5 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff finds these criteria will be met. (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. This criterion will be met. The development intends to use either LEED or B3 criteria and use the Energy Design Assistance program to meet the requirements of the policy. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. The building includes rooftop solar energy installation. This criterion will be met. (5) A PUD shall comply with the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy. The development will include 10 percent of the units available at 50 percent area median income. This criterion will be met. Zoning analysis: The following table provides the development metrics. The property is proposed to be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans, establish the development requirements for this property if approved. Zoning Compliance Table. Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Mixed-use Mixed-use Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres required for a PUD 3.73 acres Yes Height There is no minimum or maximum height adjacent to other uses. 5 stories 56 feet Yes Building Materials Minimum 60% Class I materials on all facades. East: 87% West: 60% South: 76% North: 65% Yes Dwelling Units No requirement. Affordable housing: Compliance with city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy Proposed 250 units 10% of the units affordable at 50% area median income Yes Density (units per acre Transit oriented development Min. average: 50 units per acre Max. allowed: 125 units per acre 67 units per acre Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 1.66 Yes City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 6 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Off-Street Parking 1 space per bedroom = 290 1 per 60sf restaurant = 79 1 per 250sf retail = 11 20% reduction due to LRT/bus transit and shared parking Total required: 304 Surface: 32 Parking garage: 320 On-Street: 0 Total provided: 352 Yes EV charging Stations Level 1 = 33 Level 2 = 3 Conduit level 2 = 35 Total required = 71 Level 1 = 28 Level 2 = 7 Conduit level 2 = 36 Total provided= 71 Yes Bicycle Parking 1 per dwelling unit plus 1 per 10 automobile spaces. Total required: 286 Outside: 16 Inside: 270 Total Provided: 286 Yes DORA No specific percentage with PUD 23% Yes Landscaping Replacement diameter: 191.7 caliper inches New required: Trees: 250 Shrubs: 1,500 Replacement provided: 40 caliper inches plus fee payment to city tree fund. Provided: Trees: 23 Shrubs: 327 Alternative landscaping will be provided, such as public art to satisfy this requirement. Yes Setbacks No minimum required front, rear or side setbacks. East: 4 feet West: 11 feet South: 30 feet North: 32 feet Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Yes Sidewalks Required along all street frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required Yes Transit service None required. The site is near the future Beltline LRT Station. Route 17F stops at 35th Street and Beltline Blvd. Yes Stormwater Management Meet state and city requirements Yes Uses: 3440 Beltline is a mixed-use, multi-family rental development. The units include a combination of studio, one-bedroom, two-bedroom, three-bedroom and live/work units. The breakdown of unit types is as follows: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 7 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Unit Type Summary Building Studio 1-bed 2-bed 3-bed Live/work TOTALS Market rate 48 139 30 2 5 224 Affordable 5 16 3 1 1 26 Total 53 155 33 3 6 250 Inclusionary housing policy: The inclusionary housing policy requires any residential development that chooses to request a PUD to adhere to the city’s inclusionary housing policy. The required breakdown is 20 percent of units at 60 percent area median income (AMI), 10 percent of units at 50 percent AMI or five percent of units at 30 percent AMI. The developer can choose which percentage of affordability they would like to provide. The developer proposes 10 percent of the units at 50 percent AMI. Per the Metropolitan Council, 50 percent AMI for a family of four is $51,700. Monthly rental rates at 50 percent AMI are presently $970 for a one-bedroom unit and $1,163 for a two-bedroom. Floodplain and wetlands: Portions of the site are located within the 100-year floodplain designation AE, per Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Map No. 27053C0354. The building meets the requirements of the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and the city’s floodplain ordinance to have the finished floor elevation at least two feet above the base flood elevation. The base flood elevation on this site is 879 feet above sea level and the finished floor elevation for the parking garage and the building is located at 882 feet above sea level. Following construction, an elevation certificate will be required to verify the building’s grade above the flood elevation. Additionally, all portions of the building located within the floodplain must be floodproofed. There is an existing wetland and a natural area with large trees on the north side of the site. These areas are being preserved and will be include enhancements and designed as outdoor recreation area. Utilities and easements: There is an existing 106-inch storm sewer pipe running along the southern property line and parallel to 35th Street West. This pipe is within a 30-foot easement for operations and maintenance of the utility line. No buildings and minimal improvements can be constructed within this easement. On the northern half of the site, adjacent to Park Glen Road, there is an existing 20-foot railroad easement as well as a 20-foot drainage easement. These easements will remain and additional easements are dedicated in the plat. Setbacks: There are no required minimum setbacks for a PUD in a commercial/industrial area. The building is 30 feet from the southern property line to avoid encroachment into the 106-inch storm sewer pipe easement. The building is set back significantly from the northern property line to preserve the existing wetland and natural area. The east façade of the building is situated along a curved portion of Beltline Boulevard and the building would be four feet to 14 feet from the property line. The west façade would be 11 feet from the new alley right-of-way. Façade: The building is comprised primarily of glass, brick and architectural wall cladding, all of which are class I materials. Class II materials include metal and fiber cement panels. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 8 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. The west side of the building includes the parking garage which utilizes integrally colored concrete spandrels. Portions of garage would be screened by a metal panel art installation to provide visual interest to the adjacent business park sites. The final art design will be chosen through a public process led by the city and developer. The commercial uses meet the transparency requirements on all ground floor street facing facades. Transparency levels on the ground floor retail spaces on the north and south elevation exceed the city’s minimum requirements of 50%. The building is 54% transparent on the ground floor fronting Beltline Boulevard; however, the amount of windows and doors that fall within the pedestrian zone is slightly less on the south end of the site due to the building’s elevation to accommodate the floodplain requirements. Patios and individual entrances have been added to the six-ground floor live/work units to increase the active exterior spaces on the ground floor. Traffic study: The developer hired Kimley-Horn to complete a traffic study for the development. S.E.H., a third-party expert, was hired by the city to review the traffic study. The study analyzed existing conditions and opening day (2023) no build and build scenarios. The study looked at four intersections including Park Glen Road and Beltline Boulevard, 35th Street West and Beltline Boulevard, 35th Street West and the alley/driveway, and Raleigh Avenue South and 36th Street West. In the 2023 no build scenario, the traffic study showed that all intersections operate at acceptable levels of service. Each leg of the intersection is anticipated to operate at an acceptable level of service, except for the eastbound approach and westbound left-turn and through movements at Beltline Boulevard and Park Glen Road, and the eastbound left-turn at Beltline Boulevard, and 35th Street West during the afternoon (PM) peak hour. These finding are consistent with the Beltline Boulevard Multimodal Feasibility Study completed for the city in 2019 by SRF Consulting Group. The 2023 build scenario shows similar conditions as the 2023 no build scenario, though operations at Beltline Boulevard and 35th Street West are anticipated to have an increased delay during the PM peak hour. The traffic study suggested some network improvements to facilitate improved operations and access to the development. These improvements include: •Install a traffic signal at Beltline Boulevard and Park Glen Road. •Restripe eastbound 35th Street West to create a separate left-turn and right-turn lane. •Consider connecting the alley to Park Glen Road after a traffic signal is installed at Beltline Boulevard and Park Glen Road. The city’s comprehensive plan anticipated that a traffic signal will be installed at Park Glen Road and Beltline Boulevard eventually and before 2040. It is expected that the signal will need to be installed when the Hennepin County’s site at 4600 Park Glen Road is redeveloped. This site is currently being utilized for SWLRT construction and will likely be redeveloped once LRT construction is complete. Because the side street operations are poor even in the 2023 no-build scenario and the site will not yet have direct access to Park Glen Road and contribute to delays on that side street, it is not appropriate to require Opus Group to pay for this improvement. However, the city will explore options to fund this signal prior to or at the time of future the City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 9 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. anticipated future development of the parcel at 4600 Park Glen Road when that site is no longer needed for LRT construction staging. Access: All vehicular access is provided off 35th Street West. The proposed redevelopment removes a large curb cut along Beltline Boulevard. A curb cut will be in approximately the same location as an existing driveway along 35th Street West to access the parking garage and the surface parking located on the north site of the site. This curb cut would move slightly east to better align with the dedicated alley right-of-way. There is an additional circular driveway along 35th Street West servicing the smaller of the two retail spaces. This circular driveway is also the primary drop off/entrance for the residential units. All loading and utility access is provided from the alley and the surface parking lot on the north end of the site, where areas are designated for trash loading and residential move-in/outs. There is an existing shared private access easement with the adjacent property. The adjacent property is zoned business park and several light manufacturing uses operate nearby, including Steel Toe Brewery. The alley right-of-way / driveway on the west side of the property, including the surface parking lot, are designed for large truck movements to accommodate the operation of the brewery and other light manufacturing uses. Landscaping: A total of 191.7 caliper inches of significant trees would be removed from the site and 40 caliper inches will be replanted as part of the development. The developer will be required to pay for the difference of 151.7 caliper inches into the city’s tree fund at a rate of $140 per caliper inch ($21,238). The landscape plan proposes seven new canopy trees, two new ornamental trees, seven new evergreen trees, 315 new shrubs, and 641 new perennials throughout the site. The project does not meet the city’s planting and tree replacement requirements. Code allows for alternative landscaping measures in order to meet the intent of the landscape ordinance. Staff will work with the developer to ensure the development meets the intent of the ordinance as the outdoor spaces are further refined. Green building policy: The development will be required to meet the city’s green building policy. The developer proposes a photovoltaic array on the building’s roof and will be installing electric vehicle charging stations. The developer is exploring LEED and B3 options for their sustainability program, which may include the following: LED lighting, low VOC materials, construction waste recycling, higher efficiency HVAC systems, low flow fixtures and recycled content materials. In addition, the site is near the southwest light rail Beltline Boulevard station. Beltline station area framework and design guidelines: The Beltline Station area framework and design guidelines written in 2012, established a vision for the area as a transit-oriented community hub for jobs, neighborhoods, and recreation. The properties fronting Beltline Boulevard were identified as being mixed-use with a pedestrian oriented street environment with buildings three to five stories high. The plan says buildings along Beltline should be sited to front the street and create a continuous, comfortable, and City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 10 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. attractive pedestrian-oriented streetscape. Along Beltline Boulevard, which is identified as a transit street, a complementary mixed of uses should be allowed including retail/service and residential buildings, and the building should be designed to include street level uses that promote pedestrian activity and interest. Staff finds the proposed development meets the vision, principals, and design guidelines of the Beltline area framework and design guideline plan. Neighborhood meeting: A virtual neighborhood meeting was held on May 4, 2021. Approximately four members of the public attended the meeting, not including staff, councilmembers, and representatives from the development team. There were no questions from residents in attendance. Councilmembers had some questions about the exterior materials of the parking garage, encouraged a heated outdoor space and inquired about vacancy rates and building management. Planning commission: The planning commission held a virtual public hearing on June 2, 2021. One caller phoned into the meeting to provide comments, which included a desire for more affordable units, concerns about Bass Lake Preserve, asked if TIF was requested, and stated a desire for the traffic signal at Park Glen Road to be installed as part of this development. The commission discussed the project and applauded the developer for following the city’s vision for the Beltline Area as laid out in previous planning efforts for the site and for thinking creatively addressing site constraints. The commission also asked how the development may address racial equity and inclusion. The developer said they as a company are working to incorporate diverse representation throughout the development process. While they have established relationships with larger construction firms, they are working with those firms to provide smaller scopes of work that smaller contractors and subcontractors could manage. Also, they are working to expand their network of contractors to include more women and minority-owned businesses and more diverse workforce. The commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat and the preliminary and final PUD subject to the conditions recommended by staff. Next steps: City council is scheduled to hold a second reading of the vacation ordinance and PUD ordinance on July 6, 2021. Recommendations: Staff recommend approval of the slope easement vacation. Staff recommend approval of the Beltline Industrial Park 4th Addition subject to the following conditions: 1.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved official exhibits, and city code. 2.All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 11 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. 3.Prior to the city signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: a.A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the city to ensure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the city. b.A planning development contract shall be executed between the city and developer that addresses, at a minimum: i.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to, sidewalks, boulevards, and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. ii.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. iii.The applicant shall reimburse city attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. iv.The mayor and city manager are authorized to execute the planning development contract. c.Assent form and official exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. 4.Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a.The developer shall pay to the city the park dedication fee of $375,000 and trail dedication fee of $56,250 for residential uses. b.Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. c.Assent form and official exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. d.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. e.All necessary permits shall be obtained. f.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (street, sidewalks, boulevards, utility, streetlights, landscaping, etc.) and landscaping. 5.The on-site underground storm water management systems shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. Access to the system shall be provided to the city for clean- out and inspection purposes when warranted. Access points shall be covered by a drainage and utility easement, as provided on the final plat. Staff recommend approval of the preliminary and final planned unit development for 3440 Beltline Blvd. subject to the following conditions: 1.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved official exhibits, and city code. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 12 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. 2.All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 3.Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a.Assent form and official exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. b.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. c.All necessary permits shall be obtained. 4.Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a.The developer shall sign the city's assent form and the official exhibits. b.A planning development contract shall be executed between the developer and city that addresses, at a minimum: i.The conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate. ii.Alternative landscaping requirements and tree replacement fees. iii.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to, sidewalks, trails, boulevards and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. iv.Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure. v.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. vi.The developer shall reimburse city attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final PUD approval. i.The mayor and city manager are authorized to execute said planning development contract. c.Final construction plans for all public improvements and private stormwater system shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the city engineer for review and approval. d.Building material samples and colors shall be submitted to the city for review and approval. 5.The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a.All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b.The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c.Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d.The city shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 13 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. e.Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the city engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f.The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. g.Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 6.Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the following shall be completed: a.Public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation, and storm water management system shall be installed in accordance with the official exhibits. 7.All mechanical equipment shall be fully screened. Rooftop equipment may be located as indicated in the official exhibits so as not to be visible from off-site. 8.The materials used in, and placement of, all signs shall be integrated with the building design and architecture. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 14 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Zoning map amendment exhibit City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 15 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance vacating a slope easement West side of Beltline Boulevard between Park Glen Road and 35th Street West The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The petition to vacate the slope easement was initiated by John McCain, on behalf of Belt Line Properties, Inc. Belt Line Properties owns the majority of the properties abutting the slope easement proposed to be vacated. Notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor on June 10, 2021, and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the slope easement is not needed for public purposes, and that is it in the best interest of the public that said slope easement be vacated. Section 2. The following described slope easement as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park, is vacated: A 20 foot slope easement over, under and across that part of Lot 1, Block 1, Belt Line Industrial Park 2nd Addition according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County Minnesota lying Westerly of a line 34.00 feet Westerly of the following described line, hereinafter referred to as Line A, and Northerly of Line B. Commencing at the most southerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 59 degrees 15 minutes 24 seconds East on an assumed bearing along the southeasterly extension of the southwesterly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 40.00 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence North 30 degrees 44 minutes 36 seconds East 112.38 feet; thence Northerly 768.57 feet along a tangential curve concave to the west having a radius of 785.30 feet and a central angle of 56 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds, and said line there terminating. Line B is drawn from a point on Line A 210 feet North of its point of beginning to the radial point. Section 3: The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 30, 2021) First reading June 21, 2021 Second reading July 6, 2021 Date of publication July 15, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 16 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 17 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 18 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 19 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution approving preliminary and final plat of Belt Line Industrial Park 4th Addition, 3440 Beltline Boulevard Whereas, Opus Development Company, L.L.C. applied for approval of preliminary and final plat in the manner required for platting land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and Whereas, the proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the proposed plat is situated upon lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in “Exhibit A” attached hereto. Now therefore be it resolved the proposed preliminary and final plat of Belt Line Industrial Park 4th Addition is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification by the City Clerk and subject to the following conditions: 6.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 7.All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 8.Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: d.A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the city to ensure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the city. e.A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the city and developer that addresses, at a minimum: i.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. ii.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. iii.The applicant shall reimburse City Attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 20 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. iv.The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Planning Development Contract. f.Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. 9.Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a.The developer shall pay to the city the park dedication fee of $375,000 and trail dedication fee of $56,250 for residential uses. b.Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. c.Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. d.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. e.All necessary permits shall be obtained. f.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (street, sidewalks, boulevards, utility, streetlights, landscaping, etc.) and landscaping. 10.The on-site underground storm water management systems shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. Access to the system shall be provided to the city for clean- out and inspection purposes when warranted. Access points shall be covered by a drainage and utility easement, as provided on the final plat. It is further resolved The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to the above-named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth have been fulfilled. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required under Section 26- 123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council [June 21, 2021] Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 21 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating Section 36-268-PUD 20 as a planned unit development zoning district for the property located at 3440 Beltline Boulevard The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (Case No. 21-20-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-268-PUD 20. Section 2. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from MX-1 vertical mixed-use to PUD 20: Lot 1, Block 1, Beltline Industrial Park 4th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Section 3. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 26-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 26-268-PUD 20 (a)Development Plans The site located on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Beltline Industrial Park 4th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1.Preliminary Plat 2.Final Plat 3.C000 Cover sheet 4.Existing conditions survey 5.C100 General notes 6.C101 Tree inventory and preservation plan 7.C200 Existing conditions and removal plan 8.C300 Erosion and sediment control plan – phase 1 9.C301 Erosion and sediment control plan – phase 2 10.C302 Erosion and sediment control details 11.C303 SWPPP 12.C400 Site plan 13.C401 Fire access plan 14.C500 Grading plan 15.C501 Stormwater management plan 16.C502 Stormwater details 17.C503 Stormwater details 18.C600 Utility plan 19.C700 Construction details 20.C701 Construction details 21.C702 Construction details 22.C703 Construction details 23.L100 Landscape plan 24.L101 Landscape schedule City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 22 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. 25.L102 Landscape details 26.L103 DORA plan 27.A.00 Cover sheet 28.A.01 Concept Level 1 29.A.02 Concept Level 2 30.A.03 Concept Level 3 31.A.04 Concept Level 4 32. A.05 Concept Level 5 33.A.06 Concept Roof Plan 34.A.07 Concept Elevations 35.A.08 Concept Elevations 36.A.09 Concept Elevations and Diagrams 37.A.10 Project Information and Details 38.A.11 Project Images 39.Sun Studies 40.E060 Site Photometric Plan 41.E061 Site Photometric Fixture Cut Sheet The Site shall also conform to the following requirements: 1.The property shall be developed with 250 residential units and a minimum of 7,400 square feet of ground floor commercial. 2.At least 352 off street-parking spaces shall be constructed. Up to a 20 percent reduction of required parking may be permitted for residential and non- residential uses under the terms of a parking management plan approved by the zoning administrator. 3.The maximum building height shall be 56 feet and five stories. 4.The site shall contain a minimum of 12 percent designed outdoor recreation area based on private developable land area. (b)Uses 1.Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in PUD 20: a.Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings, including but not limited to, the residential office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly room or general amenity space. 2.Permitted with Conditions. The following uses are permitted with conditions in PUD 20: a.Live/work units. i.Live-work uses as defined by Sec. 36-142 of city code are permitted on the first floor. ii.A Registration of Land Use (RLU) shall be approved by the city when there is a change in commercial tenant. b.Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to the following: restaurants, coffee shops, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms and studios. i.All parking requirements must be met for each use. ii.Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 23 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. iii.In vehicle sales is prohibited. 3.Accessory uses: Accessory uses are as follows: a.Home occupations as regulated by this chapter. b.Gardens. c.Parking lots. d.Public transit stops/shelters. e.Outdoor seating. f.Public address (PA) systems are prohibited. g.Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited. h.Accessory utility structures including: i.Small wind energy conversion system as defined in 36-4 Definitions. ii.Solar energy systems. A solar energy system with a supporting framework that is either place on, or anchored in, the ground and that is independent of any building or other structure; or that is affixed to or an integral part of a principal or accessory building, including but not limited to photovoltaic or hot water solar energy systems which are contained within roofing materials, windows, skylights, and awnings. iii.Cisterns and rainwater collection systems. (c)Special Performance Standards 1.All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking, and screening requirements. 2.All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. 3.Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the MX Zoning Districts and shall comply with the following: a.Pylon signs shall be prohibited. 4.Awnings. a.Awnings shall be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b.Backlit awnings shall be prohibited. Section 4. The contents of Planning Case File 21-19-S, 21-20-PUD, 21-21-VAC are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 30, 2021) First reading June 21, 2021 Second reading July 6, 2021 Date of publication July 15, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 24 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 25 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. DRAFT MINUTES Planning commission Members present: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Jessica Kraft, Sam Tift, Tom Weber, Joffrey Wilson Members absent: None Staff present: Jennifer Monson, Jacquelyn Kramer, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther, Clint Pires Guests: Dean Newins, Nick Murnane, Tim Callahan, John Kohler, Asher Michels-Allen 1.Call to order – roll call 2.Approval of minutes – May 19, 2021 Commissioner Kraft made a motion, Commissioner Beneke seconded, to accept the May 19, 2021, minutes as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 3.Hearings 3a. Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Applicant: Opus Group Case No: 21-19-S, 21-20-PUD Ms. Monson presented the report. Commissioner Beneke asked what the difference is between MX-1 and the PUD. Ms. Monson stated MX-1 would require more commercial on the ground floor along Beltline Boulevard. She added the live-work units do offer the flexibility and opportunity for commercial use along the ground floor. Commissioner Weber asked if the city is viewing this as a marquee development in St. Louis Park. Ms. Monson agreed and stated that this development is in line with the vision for Beltline Boulevard. She added staff met with many prospective developers for this site and shared the city wanted to make sure development meets the city’s goals as outlined in the Beltline Station Area Plan. She stated what is being proposed implements the vision for Beltline Boulevard/Station area, and this development is similar to what was shown in public feedback sessions during the station area planning process. Commissioner Weber asked if the alley, when built, will be the city’s responsibility. Ms. Monson stated that is correct, adding provided it is constructed to city standards and it is in proper condition when it is transferred. The exact location of the alley connection to Park Glen Road will also need to be confirmed, as it would be preferable to connect at a right angle and as far to the west as possible. Commissioner Weber asked if the lot lines will be easier to see when the development is finished. Ms. Monson stated yes, the surface parking for the development is further north than the adjacent buildings. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 26 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Commissioner Weber agreed with the stop light at Park Glen Road and asked about traffic calming in the area also. Ms. Monson stated the city has a project in 2021 to restripe the street from four to three lanes, add on-street bike lanes, and a construct small median at 35th Street and striped pedestrian crosswalk. Commissioner Weber stated with the Bass Lake Preserve across the street, there should be a crosswalk. Ms. Monson agreed. Commissioner Wilson asked, when thinking about the goals of the city and racial equity, is there opportunity for the developer to demonstrate leadership in this area either as a company or on this project specifically by hiring certain underrepresented groups or by other means. Mr. Murnane stated Opus is discussing and thinking about this internally and working on how they can be better at this in all aspects in the development. Mr. Newins added this is part of the core values of Opus and there is an awareness and appreciation of this issue. Mr. Callahan agreed and added Opus is making a conscientious effort to expand and work with additional sub-contractors and create opportunities in this area. Commissioner Kraft asked if the improvements on Beltline will occur prior to the development construction. Ms. Monson stated yes, the improvements will occur this year, including a roundabout at 36th street, restriping, and completing the trail on the west side of Beltline Boulevard. Chair Eckholm noted the parking will be at 304 spaces, which is 20% less. Ms. Monson stated yes, this 20% reduction allows for more flexibility for residential and commercial tenants within the PUD ordinance. Commissioner Tift asked about the planting requirements. He asked if there is a plan related to the alternative planting. Ms. Monson stated typically developments do not meet the city’s planting requirements and this development would require 250 trees and many shrubs. She stated the city typically utilizes public art as an alternative. The process for selecting art is typically a city and developer led process. This includes neighborhood representatives, following city approvals as laid out in a development agreement. She also noted the public art and the public art process are other opportunities to include diversity and inclusion in the project. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. Lee Cannel, 4501 Park Glen Road, asked if this is a marquee development and why can they not go higher than 10% minimum affordable that is required. The caller noted the Bass Lake Preserve is a fragile environment and he has concerns about how the development might affect the preserve. He asked about TIF and if the developer is asking for that and why. He also asked if there will be a traffic light at Park Glen Road and Beltline Blvd. The caller adding the developer should help pay for the light, especially with so many people living in the area and so much traffic there also. He asked if other developers were interested in affordable housing projects here, such as Common Bond. He stated the developer should meet all the environmental goals of St. Louis Park, adding we need to do better to meet the goals of the city. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Page 27 Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Chair Eckholm stated this is a private development and the city did not seek out this developer. He added the city is the steward and does not typically seek out other developers; the city looks to see if the development meets the goals of the city. He agreed he would like to see a higher percentage of affordable units as well. Mr. Walther stated TIF is anticipated due to extraordinary development costs and a financial gap in the feasibility of the project. In addition, because of the PUD, this development will be required to meet the city’s green building policy and inclusionary housing policy. He added this development meets these requirements. He also added this development is not being asked to provide a signal at Park Glen Road. He stated the signal is not yet warranted there. The city does plan to have one there in the future and the timing will be triggered when there is a demonstrated need and higher volumes are seen on the side streets. He added the city will look to fund and advance that in the future and likely timed with the development of 4600 Beltline Blvd. Mr. Walther added the city is looking to protect Bass Lake and will provide stormwater treatment which will be far better than what is currently there. He stated there will be vast improvements to the water quality and reduction in the rate stormwater is released from this site into Bass Lake with this development. Ms. Monson agreed with Commissioner Weber’s comments that this is a private development and that affordable housing is also important in the city. She added the housing policy for the city does encompass various tiers for affordability at the light rail stations. Commissioner Weber added the requirements of the city on housing affordability are determined by the city council. The planning commission works on projects that include affordability, including an application for another site in the city later in the agenda. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kraft stated this is a thorough project with much research and thought. She appreciates the live-work spaces and retail/commercial at either end and she sees this changing more as light rail moves in. She stated she is supportive and thinks it is very well done. Commissioner Beneke thanked staff and the developer on this and appreciated how the city is considering more affordability also. He stated he will support this as well. Chair Eckholm stated this development represents a great step for the area and this will set the standard for the Beltline Blvd area and future developments in the area. He stated he also will support this project. Commissioner Weber made a motion and Commissioner Dagane seconded to recommend approval of the development proposal for 3440 Beltline Boulevard as presented. The motion passed 7-0. • '88.78 -/ S s---PFR-SPLAH- �� ,._ __ 5 s-1-.:..c:=!Cllc--a.A-Y--:feiPE::-::-• 1 , 1 HOT FIELD VERlf1ED ,�,,.,,,.,, _ ...,, A n �--A SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT s-L.; L L t , L. 27< 1 1i-'',_ I 1, BLOCK 1, BEL TLINE � - - '-1 1 I C 1�-1 /\ 1 INDUSTRIAL PARK 2ND ADDITION It/ '\I �I C a U L L- ---s--"-"z -- s \ \ \ AREA SUMMARIES: Lot 1, Block 1 162,289 square feet. or 3. 72564 acres, more or less Belt Line Boulevard Dedicated Right of Way 5,219 square feet, or 0.11981 acres, more or less Dedicated Alley 4,224 square feet, or 0.09697 acres, more or less Total Parcel Area 171,732 square feet, or 3.94242 acres, more or less SECTION 6 TOWNSHIP 28N, RANGE 24W INNETONKA BL VO. g 36TH ST. VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE FIELD BOOK PAGE FIELDWORK CHIEF: ---------+----ILH NO. DATE GENERAL SURVEY NOTES: 1. The orientation of this bearing system Is based on the Hennepin County coordinate grid (NAD 83-2011 Adj.). 2. Title work was not furnished to Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. for the preparation of this survey to verify ownership, thelegal description, or the existence of any easements or encumbrances. 3. The contours depicted hereon are per elevation data collected while conducting the fieldwork. The contour interval is 1foot. BENCHMARK: Top of Minnesota Department of Transportation Geodetic Monument "2734 JN GSID Station #95553 Elevation = 884.35 feet. (NAVD88) SITE BENCHMARK: Top nut of hydrant located at the southwest quadrant of 35th Street West and Beltline Boulevard Elevation = 880.64 feet. (NAVD88) 4. Existing utilities, services and underground structures shown hereon were located either physically, from existing recordsmade available to us, by resident testimony, or by locations provided by Gopher State One Call, per Ticket No. 203013857. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completelyand reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavationmay be necessary. Other utilities and services may be present and verification and location of all utilities and services should be obtained from the owners of the respective utilities prior to any design, planning or excavation. 5. The property described hereon lies within Flood Zones "AE" (base flood elevation determined), "X" (areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance flood plain) and "X SHADED" (areas of 0.2% annual chance flood plain: areas of 1% annual chance flood with overage depths of less than 1 foot or with drainage areas less than 1 square mile; and areas protected by levees from 1% annual chance flood.) per Federal Insurance Rate Map No. 27053C 0354 F, dated November04, 2016. The delineotlon llnes between flood zones depicted hereon Is subject to mop scale uncertainty. The base flood elevation in this area is 879 (NGVD29). This elevation correlates to 879.2 (NAVD88). The delineation line between zones AE and other flood zones at 879.2 (NAVD88) is depicted hereon. REVISIONS DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: \ . _ 'XJO ZON£ •x• PER FEMA \,co /JN' NO. 2706X0J54F LEGEND • SET 5/8 INCH REBAR WITH CAP MARKED L.S. 47476 SURVEY FOR: I DRAWN BY: t---+-----+--------------------1 a------ --- RRR DRAWING NAME: 'c'cA"'"T,,__ ___ 1----1----+------------------1 BELT LINE INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES 39451 Plat.dwg JOB NO. :ECKED FILE NO.-----ER PROPERTY ADDRESS: PRELIMINARY PLAT OF: BELT LINE INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, Belt Line Industrial Park 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, except that part thereof lying Easterly of a line 34 feet Westerly of the following described line: Commencing at the most Southerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 59 degrees 15 minutes 24 seconds East on an assumed bearing along the Southeasterly extension of the Southwesterly llne of sold Lot 1 a distance of 40.00 feet to the point of beginning of said line; thence North 30 degrees 44 minutes 36 seconds East 112.38 feet; thence Northerly 768.57 feet along a tangential curve concave to the West having a radius of 785.30 feet and a central angle of 56 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds, and said line there terminating. PROPOSED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 1, Block 1, BELT LINE INDUSTRIAL PARK 4TH ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota 0 30 60 90 I I SCALE IN ,.._ ......... , R.£.-878.SB • I FEET LEGEND -1' I q· " ..,._..,.....,. .. BENCHMARK SANITARY MANHOLE STORM MANHOLE CATCH BASIN ROOF DRAIN (OUTLET) AUTO SPRINKLER GATE VALVE HYDRANT BUILDING LIGHT ELECTRIC BOX ELECTRIC METER -? .,,, -------181 HANDHOLE -)}-LIGHT 'Q UTILITY POLE c--GUY WIRE r, ,. ---s--- ---ss-- ---w--- ---E--- --OHW-- ---FO-- ---G--- rYYVYYVYY', ,,-----920/ 8oRJ: I --......_ --1 F.F.E. OWNER BELT LINE INDUSTRIAL PARK, INC. 3440 BEL TUNE BL VD. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416 CIVIL ENGINEER WILL MATZEK, P.£ KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOC/A TES 767 EUSTIS STREET -SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 Phone: 651-645-4197 LAND SURVEYOR ERIC ROESER EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. COMMUNICATION BOX FIBER OPTIC SIGN GAS METER SIGN MAILBOX FLAGPOLE BOLLARD HANDICAPPED PARKING SPACE HANDICAPPED PARKING SIGN GUARDRAIL SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC OVERHEAD WIRE UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND GAS TREELINE EXISTING CONTOUR LINE TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE LANDSCAPE SURFACE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION 1229 TYLER STREET NORTHEAST -SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 Phone: 612-466-3300 3510 BELTLINE BOULEVARD 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 PHONE: (612) 466-3300 FAX: (612) 466-3383 WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA 55416 Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc.COPYRIGHT © 2021 By EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC. land surveyors since 1872 SHEET 1 OF1 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 28 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 29 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 30 PROPOSED BUILDING FFE: 882.0 RETAIL FFE: 883.0 RETAIL FFE: 882.0 GARAGE ENTRY BOCCE COURT ONEWAY EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA- SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAIL20.0'8.5' 20.0'23.0'10.0'20.0'10.0'5.0'10.0'1.0'4.0'MOVE-IN AREA ENTRY, 883.0 ENTRY, 882.0 EXISTING PROPERTY LINE 4' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ENTRY 12.7' 6.0'24.0'6.0'TYP.8.0' TYP. ENTRY 8.5' 8.5' TYP.18.0'TYP.R10.0' R10.0' R10.0'R10.0' 8.0'26.0'28.5' 48.5'88.0'6.0' 6.0' 35.8' 28.5'10.0'19.0'24.0'12.0'28.0'40.0' 75.0' 5.0'5.0'7.0'11.0'26.0' 42.0' 32.0'30.0'14.0'26.5'12.9'30.0'6.0'28.3' 28.3' 8.8' 33.5'12.0'14.0'4.5' TYP. 18.5' TYP.4.0'11.0'57.0'59.5'39.0' 8.0' 8.0'8.0'12.0' 19.3' 12.0' 16.0' 26.0'8.5'42.5'8.5'26.0'18.0'36.0'8.5'8.5'52.9'10.0'A A A A 31.0'A G F E J J A C C D D H H I I I I I I I I I I TYP. A TYP. A (3) - 6" STAIRS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS C C L L L L LL M N BEGINS M N ENDS 18.6'28.0' 5.5' O O 31.0' 11 10 7 4 A EXISTING BITUMINOUS TRAIL BY CITY 16.0'14.0' (6) - 5.5" STAIRS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (6) - 6" STAIRS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (7) - 6" STAIRS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS (5) - 6" STAIRS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS EXISTING ADJACENT BUILDING C GATE AMENITY ENTRANCE/ EXIT C C L UTILITY EXCAVATION PATCH, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS J C TYP. C TYP.32.9'1 6 . 9 '16.6 ' I I I I PR. TRANSFORMER PAD ELECTRICAL ROOM WATER ROOM 31.0' C C P P P P V PROPOSED RAMP WITH RAILING L C CL L L L L Q Q 31.0'20.9'PR. TRANSFORMER PAD 5.0' 43.3'53.6'22.5' 3 0 . 3 '31.5'PROPOSED DOG RUN, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS 44.6 ' 41.6' 38.1' R3.0' R3.0' K K K SCREEN WALL; SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS R R C S (10 SPACES) S (6 SPACES) EXISTING 10' ELECTRIC EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 927757 20' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 991559 20' WIDE RAILROAD EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2982801 T T TTTTT TT T EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED 5' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED ALLEY DEDICATION R 9.9'5.0'19.9'5.0' R10.0' R10.0'5.0'12.0'7.0'30.0' EXISTING ±1,105 SF WETLAND TO BE FILLED 5.0'EXISTING PEDESTRIAN RAMP BY CITY; CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE BITUMINOUS TRAIL, MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION PER CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS U U U F PROPOSED ±1' RETAINING WALL, SEE SHEET C500 PROPOSED RAMP WITH RAILING (2) - 6" STAIRS, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS PROPOSED 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PROPOSED 10' DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT 10.0' PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY 5.0'G 24.0'4.0' PROPOSED ±1' RETAINING WALL, SEE SHEET C500 PROPOSED ±1.5' RETAINING WALL, SEE SHEET C500 ENTRY, 882.0 ENTRY, 880.0 ENTRY, 882.0 ENTRY, 882.0 ENTRY, 882.0 ENTRY ENTRY PR. TRANSFORMER PAD W M M M ENTRY, 883.0 ENTRY, 883.0 BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 162,289 SF (3.73 AC) GROUND FLOOR AREA 88,244 SF (54.4% OF TOTAL PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA) GROSS FLOOR AREA (EXC. PARKING STRUCTURE)269,914 SF (1.66 FAR) PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 230 SPACES (1 STALL/ BEDROOM; 230 UNITS) PROPOSED PARKING:OFF-STREET: 32 SPACES ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 3 STALLS / 4 STALLS PROPOSED EXTERIOR BICYCLE PARKING 16 SPACES PROPERTY SUMMARY 3440 BELTLINE BLVD EXISTING PROPERTY AREA 171,732 SF (3.94 AC) PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA 162,289 SF (3.73 AC) DEDICATED BELTLINE BLVD ROW AREA 5,219 SF (0.12 AC) DEDICATED ALLEY AREA 4,224 SF (0.10 AC) EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA 115,138 SF (2.65 AC) EXISTING PERVIOUS AREA 47,150 SF (1.08 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 121,858 SF (2.80 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 40,430 SF (0.93 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 174,960 SF (4.02 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING MX-1: VERTICAL MIXED-USE AND FLOOD PLAIN PROPOSED ZONING PUD: PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PARKING SETBACKS SIDE/REAR = 0' ROAD = 0' PROVIDED BUILDING SETBACKS BELTLINE BLVD = 5' 35TH AVE = 31' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED FENCE SETBACK LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK 6" CONCRETE FILLED PIPE BOLLARD MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB FLUSH CURB COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRON LIGHT POLE; SEE PHOTOMETRICS PLAN PROPOSED METAL FENCE PEDESTRIAN RAMP BIKE RACK CONNECT TO ADJACENT EXIST. BITUMINOUS TRAIL, CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM LOCATION, GRADES, AND CONDITION PAVEMENT MARKING PROPOSED RAILING MOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V WThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\OPUS\Beltline - St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg May 24, 2021 - 10:52am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY EGAN, FIELD & NOWAK, INC, DATED 11/16/2020. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL EXISTING PROPERTY AREA IS 3.94 ACRES. 9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 16. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 8.5' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.NORTHPREPARED FORSITE PLANC4003440 BELTLINEBLVDOPUS DEVELOPMENTST. LOUIS PARKMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.LAURA E. CLARENS, P.E.05/24/202158852DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16056101405/24/2021AS SHOWNAKAAKALECBELTLINE TRAIL AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN 2021; IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON FINAL PLANS. TIP OUT CURB AND GUTTER; SEE SITE DETAILS City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 31 LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) FENCE - OWNER TO CONFIRM BOCCE COURT - BY OTHERS LANDSCAPE AREAS - PLANTINGS/GROUNDCOVER TO BE CONFIRMED DOG RUN - TURF MATERIAL TO BE CONFIRMED CONCRETE (TYP.) A LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) A B C D DDDDDDD D B E L T L I N E B O U L E V A R D3 5 T H S T R E E T W E S TONEWAY DOG RUN A B A B A B A B 6 - TAU 4 - SEM 9 - LDN12 - SEM 8 - GOJ10 - HMG8 - BLC11 - SEM 7 - TAU 15 - BES 10 - HMG 12 - RBC 10 - SEM9 - LDN 8 - TAU 14 - SEM7 - TAU47 - HMG 28 -NEA 12 - LDN 39 - BES 37 - NEA 6 - TAU 15 - SEM EXISTING TREE EXISTING TREE 9 - BES3 - LDN 9 - NEA3 - RTD 8 - RBC3 - BLC 9 - BES3 - LDN 3 - RTD 7 - TAU 11 - LDN 10 - TAU 1 - SWO 28 - RBC 10 - HMG17 - RBC 18 - SEM1 - ALS 1 - ALS 1 - SWO 15 - JPW 37 - BES 1 - SWO 44 - HMG 5 - SEM 7 - RTD 5 - SEM 9 - HL2 10 - HMG 4 - KCY7 - BHS EXISTING TREES 17 - RBC 4 - GLS 17 - BES 14 - RBC 4 - GLS21 - BES 11 - RTD BOCCE BALL, BY OTHERS A D D D D D 6 - GOJ 10 - HMG 7 - NEA 3 - LDN 4 - BLC 3 - LDN 11 - RBC 15 - NEA 7 - NEA 11 - NEA 9 - BLC AMENITY DECK - SEE ARCH PLANS 9 - JPW 4 - GLS20 - BES 7 - RBC5 - RBC 10 - TAU 9 - SEM 22 - PDSB 5 - LDN CONIFEROUS TREE CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME BHS PICEA GLAUCA `DENSATA` / BLACK HILLS SPRUCE ORNAMENTAL TREE CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ALS AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLANCE` / AUTUMN BRILLANCE SERVICEBERRY CLUMP OVERSTORY TREE CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME KCY GYMNOCLADUS DIOICA `ESPRESSO` / ESPRESSO KENTUCKY COFFEETREE SWO QUERCUS BICOLOR / SWAMP WHITE OAK CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME GOJ JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL` / GREY OWL JUNIPER TAU TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII` / TAUTON YEW DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME BLC ARONIA MELANOCARPA `IROQUOIS BEAUTY` TM / IROQUOIS BEAUTY BLACK CHOKEBERRY GLS RHUS AROMATICA `GRO-LOW` / GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC PLANT SCHEDULE HL2 HYDRANGEA PANICULATA `SMHPLQF` TM / LITTLE QUICK FIRE PANICLE HYDRANGEA LDN PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TM / LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK RTD CORNUS SERICEA `ALLEMAN`S COMPACT` / DWARF RED TWIG DOGWOOD SEM SORBARIA SORBIFOLIA `SEM` / SEM FALSESPIREA PERENNIALS CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME BES RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM` / BLACK-EYED SUSAN HMG PANICUM VIRGATUM `HEAVY METAL` / HEAVY METAL SWITCH GRASS JPW EUPATORIUM `PHANTOM` / PHANTOM JOE-PYE-WEED NEA ASTER NOVAE-ANGLIAE / NEW ENGLAND ASTER PDS SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS / PRAIRIE DROPSEED RBC ECHINACEA PURPUREA `RUBINSTERN` / RUBY STAR CONEFLOWER This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\OPUS\Beltline - St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg May 24, 2021 - 10:46am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL1003440 BELTLINEBLVDOPUS DEVELOPMENTST. LOUIS PARKMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.MITCHELL G. COOKAS, P.L.A.05/24/202156522DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16056101405/24/2021AS SHOWNPWBPWBMGCLANDSCAPE SUMMARY REQUIRED TREES-MULTIFAMILY: 230 TREES* = (ONE TREE PER DWELLING UNIT) PROVIDED TREES-MULTIFAMILY: 25 TREES = 16 PROPOSED + 9 PRESERVED *MINIMUM 25% DECIDUOUS & 25% CONIFEROUS, NO MORE THAN 30% ONE SPECIES. REQUIRED SHRUBS-MULTIFAMILY: 1,801 SHRUBS = (300,060 GROSS FLOOR AREA / 1000) * 6 OR (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 213 SHRUBS = (1,774 L.F. SITE PERIMETER / 50) *6 PROVIDED SHRUBS-MULTIFAMILY: 942 SHRUBS = 314 SHRUBS + 628 PERENNIALS THE REMAINING QUANTITIES OF TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED/MITIGATED VIA OTHER SITE FEATURES TO BE CONFIRMED BETWEEN CITY AND OWNER (SUCH AS PUBLIC ART FEATURES) REQUIRED SCREENING: BUILDINGS/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO RESIDENTIAL USES. OFF-STREET PARKING WITHIN 30' OF RESIDENTIAL & R.O.W. LOADING AND SERVICE AREA. OUTSIDE STORAGE & REFUSE HANDLING. MECHANICAL AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT. UTILITY SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES. SCREENING-VEGETATION, FENCES, WALLS, BERMS, HEDGES, LANDSCAPE MATERIAL, OR A COMBINATION. PROVIDED SCREENING: BUILDINGS/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO RESIDENTIAL USES OFF-STREET PARKING WITHIN 30' OF RESIDENTIAL & R.O.W. LOADING AND SERVICE AREAS. OUTSIDE STORAGE & REFUSE HANDLING. MECHANICAL AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT. UTILITY SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES. SCREENING- VEGETATION, FENCES, WALLS, BERMS, HEDGES, LANDSCAPE MATERIAL, OR A COMBINATION OF.NORTH BELTLINE TRAIL AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN 2021; IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN FOR REFERENCE AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON FINAL PLANS. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 32 B E L T L I N E B O U L E V A R D3 5 T H S T R E E T W E S TPROPOSED BUILDING FFE: 882.0 RETAIL FFE: 883.0 RETAIL FFE: 882.0 GARAGE ENTRY BOCCE COURT ONEWAY EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA- SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR DETAIL PROPOSED BUILDING FFE: 882.0 EXTERIOR AMENITY AREA RETAIL FFE: 882.0 MOVE-IN AREA ENTRY EXISTING PROPERTY LINE PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EXISTING 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ENTRY RETAIL FFE: 882.0 R10.0'R10.0' R10.0'R10.0' ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY ENTRY This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER2021 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\OPUS\Beltline - St Louis Park\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-DORA PLAN.dwg May 24, 2021 - 10:47am©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTHPREPARED FORDORA PLANL1033440 BELTLINEBLVDOPUS DEVELOPMENTST. LOUIS PARKMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.MITCHELL G. COOKAS, P.L.A.05/24/202156522DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16056101405/24/2021AS SHOWNPWBPWBMGCDESIGNED OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA (DORA) LEGEND DATA TABLE PROPOSED DORA AREAS TOTAL LOT AREA: 166,513 SF DORA REQUIRED (12% LOT AREA):19,982 SF DORA PROVIDED (23% LOT AREA):38,336 SF City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 33 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:16 AMCover Sheet A.00 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D.Newins T.Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 3440 Beltline Boulevard SHEET INDEX A.00 A.01 A.02 A.03 A.04 A.05 Cover Sheet Concept Level 1 Concept Level 2 Concept Level 3 Concept Level 4 Concept Level 5 ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 A.06 A.07 A.08 A.09 A.10 A.11 Concept Roof Plan Concept Elevations Concept Elevations Concept Elevations Prof. Info and Details Project Images Conceptual Imagery For Illustrative Purposes Only. Refer to Architectural, Civil and Landscape Drawings for Details. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 34 2 BR 2 BR2 BR2 BR E / D L/W L/W L/W L/W L/W ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ELEV LOBBY 1 BR1 BR MAIL/PKG EXTERIOR AMENITY 18' - 0"24' - 0"18' - 0"UP MOVE-IN/LOADING1 BR ELEC TRASH/RECY 475 SF TERRACES AT LEVEL 1RETAIL PARKING: 28 SPACES E/D TERRACES & GARDEN WALL AT L-1 LEASING L/W E/D2 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR GATED AMENITY ENTRY/EXIT LOBBY/ LEASING EASEMENT 30' - 0"20' - 0"RETAIL PATIO AND ENTRY L/W PATIO AND ENTRY (TYP) AUTO ENTRY ASSUMED PROPERTY LINE: 1'-0" FROM EDGE OF TRAIL ASSUMED 4'-0" EASEMENT LINEST PATIO 20' - 0"HC 1 BR+ PATIO WTR ROOM CLUB LIVING FITNESS YOGA ONE WAY RAMP 882ENHANCED PAVINGFLUSH CURB STOR. 1 BR1 BR+ ST 20' - 0" 6' - 0" 6' - 0" WM ELEV LOBBY MECH. BIKE PARKING (10) BIKE PARKING (6)34' - 0"6' - 0"24' - 0"60' - 6"30' - 0"6' - 0"1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST ST ST SLOPE UPRETAIL - RESTAURANT 2700 SF RETAIL - RESTAURANT 4750 SF EV STALL LEVEL 2 EVCS 8' - 6"8' - 6"18' - 0"(TYP)8' - 6"18' - 0" (TYP) 3CY 17' - 0"28' - 0" T R +/- 3' - 9"TRASH/RECY CHUTES T/R 100 SF SERVICE DOOR FOR DELIVERIES AND TRASH FOB ACCESS GARAGE DOOR TO RESIDENTIAL PARKING RETAIL PARKING: 25 SPACES BIKE STORAGE AND MAINTENANCE (53) EV STALL LEVEL 2 EVCS RESIDENTIAL GUEST 8' - 6"8' - 6"18' - 0"RETAIL PARKING WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACK (18) EV STALL LEVEL 2 EVCS LEVEL 2 EVCS FUTURE EV STALLS (3)EV STALLLEVEL 2 EVCSPUBLIC USEEV STALLLEVEL 2 EVCSPUBLIC USEEV STALL LEVEL 2 EVCS PUBLIC USELEVEL 2 EVCSFUTURE EV STALLS (3)BICYCLE PARKING LEVEL 1 :86 LEVEL 2 : 148 LEVEL 3 : 51 TOTAL : 269 EV STALLS LEVEL 1 EVCS PUBLIC USE:1 (ACCESSIBLE) LEVEL 2 EVCS PUBLIC USE:4 LEVEL 1 EVCS RESIDENTIAL USE:30 LEVEL 2 EVCS RESIDENTIAL USE:1 LEVEL 2 EVCS RESIDENTIAL USE:1 (GUEST USE) LEVEL 2 FUTURE PUBLIC ACCESS:6 LEVEL 2 FUTURE RESID. ACCESS:30 AUTO PARKING RETAIL USES:53 RESID. USES : 299 TOTAL : 352 LEVEL 2 1 EV LEVEL 1 EVCS RESIDENTIAL USE 17 EV STALLS SLOPE DOWN CURB PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY PAINTED STRIPING SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:17 AMConcept Level 1 A.01 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 0'40'10'20' ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 35 ST 2 BR 2 BR2 BR2 BR ST STOR. OPEN TO BELOW DOWN OPEN TO BELOW ST OPEN TO BELOW 1 BR OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW ST ST E/D ST 1 BR 1 BR+1 BR+1 BR+1 BR+1 BR+1 BR+ T/R STOR. 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST ST ST 1 BR OPEN TO BELOW POOL EQUIP. 1 BR1 BR 1 BR1 BR+ 1 BR+ MECH. ST UP ELEV LOBBY ELEV LOBBY ST ST 6' - 0"30' - 0"60' - 6"24' - 0"6' - 0"34' - 0"1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST E / D E/D2 BR 23' - 0" TYP.8' - 6"8' - 6"18' - 0" 18' - 0" (TYP) TRASH/RECY CHUTES BIKE STORAGE (69)8' - 6"BIKE STORAGE (69) WALL MOUNTED BIKE RACK (10) LEVEL 1 EVCS, RESIDENTIAL USE 12 EV STALLS (11 STANDARD, 1 ACCESSIBLE) LEVEL 2 EVCS, RES. USE 5 FUTURE EV STALLS SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:18 AMConcept Level 2 A.02 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 0'40'10'20' ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 36 2 BR TERRACES UNIT TERRACES 2 BR 1 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR ST 1 BR POOL 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST ST 1 BR 1 BR 3 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST STOR.66' - 0"148' - 0"66' - 0"ST 50' - 0" ST ST 1 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR1 BR1 BR+ 50' - 0" STOR. 1 BR1 BR+ 37' - 6" ST DOWN ELEV LOBBY ELEV LOBBY MECH. UP 2 BR 2 BR2 BR2 BR ST ST E/D ST ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST E / D E/D2 BR 124' - 0" EXIT TRAVEL DISTANCE 123' - 6" EXIT TRAVEL DISTANCE UNIT TERRACE HOT TUB POOL SEATING CABANA CABANA 43' - 0" LEVEL 2, RESIDENTIAL USE FUTURE EV STALLS T/R TRASH/RECY CHUTES BIKE STORAGE (51) SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:19 AMConcept Level 3 A.03 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 0'40'10'20' ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 37 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR 2 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST ST 1 BR 1 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST ST ST ST 1 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR1 BR1 BR+ AMENITY BELOW 3 BR STOR. STOR. 1 BR1 BR+ ST ELEV LOBBY ELEV LOBBY 2 BR 2 BR2 BR2 BR ST ST E/D ST ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST E / D E/D2 BR MECH. DOWN OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 50' - 0" 43' - 0" 50' - 0"23' - 0"37' - 6" T/R8' - 6"18' - 0"24' - 0" TRASH/RECY CHUTES SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:20 AMConcept Level 4 A.04 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 0'40'10'20' ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 38 2 BR 2 BR 1 BR ST 1 BR ROOFTOP DECK 745 SF MAX ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST ST 1 BR 1 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST ST ST ST 1 BR ST 1 BR 1 BR1 BR1 BR+ OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW 3 BR STOR. STOR. 1 BR1 BR+ ST ELEV LOBBY ELEV LOBBY 2 BR 2 BR 2 BR2 BR2 BR ST ST E/D ST ST 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR 1 BR ST E / D E/D2 BR 1 BR PLANTER PLANTER50' - 0" 99' - 6" EXIT TRAVEL DISTANCE 43' - 0" 50' - 0"23' - 0"37' - 6" T/R TRASH/RECY CHUTESPHOTO-VOLTAIC PANELSSHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:21 AMConcept Level 5 A.05 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 0'40'10'20' ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 39 PARKING STRUCTURE BELOW RAISED CORNICE ELEMENT PARAPET (TYP) RAISED CORNICE ELEMENT RAISED CORNICE ELEMENT PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY OPEN TO BELOW PHOTO-VOLTAIC PANELSSHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:21 AMConcept Roof Plan A.06 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 0'40'10'20' ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 40 LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -4" LEVEL 3 120' -8" LEVEL 4 131' -0" LEVEL 5 141' -4" ROOF 152' -8" 312 1A 57 8ALL VENTING ON EXTERIOR WALL FINISHED TO MATCH ADJACENT MATERIAL (TYP) 78 12 PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY 11' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"10' - 4"DECORATIVE METAL PANELS 52' - 8"155' - 10"155' - 10"155' - 10" TRANSP. ZONE 2A 3A 6 3 3A 244 GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY ZONE SEE DIAGRAM ON A.09 6' - 0"2' - 0"LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -4" LEVEL 3 120' -8" LEVEL 4 131' -0" LEVEL 5 141' -4" ROOF 152' -8" 1 3822A 3A 111102233A13 FAÇADE TREATMENT TO INCLUDE METAL PANEL ART INSTALLATION SIMILAR TO WHAT IS SHOWN. FINAL DESIGN TO BE COORDINATED WITH AN APPROVED ARTIST AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PERMIT SUBMITTAL LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -4" LEVEL 3 120' -8" LEVEL 4 131' -0" LEVEL 5 141' -4" ROOF 152' -8" 1 3 7588 2' - 0"6' - 0"63A2 1 1 3 3A2 GROUND FLOOR TRANSPARENCY ZONE 1676 SF TRANSPARENCY 886 SF (53%) LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -4" LEVEL 3 120' -8" LEVEL 4 131' -0" LEVEL 5 141' -4" ROOF 152' -8" 1 1A 3 2PREFINISHED METAL CANOPY 87 633A3A 3 3A 1 BRICK ACCENT BRICK ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING COLOR 1 VERTICAL TEXTURE ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING COLOR 1 SMOOTH TEXTURE ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING COLOR 2 VERTICAL TEXTURE ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING COLOR 2 SMOOTH TEXTURE ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING COLOR 3 FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL COLOR 1 FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL COLOR 2 METAL TRELLIS ELEMENT ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM EIFS COLOR 1 EIFS COLOR 2 METAL ART PANEL -DESIGN T.B.D. METAL PANEL COLOR 1 INTEGRAL COLORED CONCRETE 1A KEYNOTE LEGEND 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2A 3A 11 12 13 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:24 AMConcept Elevations A.07 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 1" = 20'-0"1 East Elevation 1" = 20'-0"3 West Elevation 1" = 20'-0"2 South Elevation 1" = 20'-0"4 North Elevation ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 EAST SIDE FACADE AREA: 23,608 SF CLASS I MATERIALS: GLASS:6,842 SF BRICK:5,565 SF ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING:8,155 SF TOTAL CLASS I MATERIALS:20,562 SF PERCENTAGE:87% CLASS II MATERIALS: METAL PANEL:1,517 SF FIBER CEMENT PANEL:1,312 SF TOTAL CLASS II MATERIALS:2,829 SF PERCENTAGE:12% SOUTH SIDE FACADE AREA: 15,536 SF CLASS I MATERIALS: GLASS:5,426 SF BRICK:3,426 SF ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING:2,954 SF TOTAL CLASS I MATERIALS:11,806 SF PERCENTAGE:76% CLASS II MATERIALS: FIBER CEMENT PANEL:2,767 SF TOTAL CLASS II MATERIALS:2,767 SF PERCENTAGE:18% WEST SIDE FACADE AREA: 17,990 SF CLASS I MATERIALS: GLASS:3,393 SF BRICK:1,912 SF ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING:5,490 SF TOTAL CLASS I MATERIALS:10,795 SF PERCENTAGE:60% CLASS II MATERIALS: INTEGRAL COLORED CONCRETE:2,721 SF EIFS:736 SF ART PANELS:2,555 SF TOTAL CLASS II MATERIALS:6,012 SF PERCENTAGE:33% NORTH SIDE FACADE AREA: 14,130 SF CLASS I MATERIALS: GLASS:4,580 SF BRICK:1,810 SF ARCHITECTURAL WALL CLADDING:3,478 SF TOTAL CLASS I MATERIALS:9,868 SF PERCENTAGE:70% CLASS II MATERIALS: FIBER CEMENT PANEL:3,753 SF TOTAL CLASS II MATERIALS:3,753 SF PERCENTAGE:27% City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 41 SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER Opus Design Build, L.L.C. Opus AE Group, L.L.C. 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 10350 Bren Road West Minnetonka, MN 55343-0110 952-656-4444 PLOT DATE:PROJECT PROJECT NUMBER CONSULTANT REGISTRATION DRAWN BY CHECKED BY PROJECT MANAGER DATE PROJECT ADDRESS 5/24/2021 11:46:31 AMProject Images A.11 3440 Beltline Boulevard St. Louis Park, MN 31815000 D. Newins T. Grothe T. Callahan 05/24/21 Conceptual Imagery For Illustrative Purposes Only. Refer to Architectural, Civil and Landscape Drawings for Details. View of East Side Conceptual Imagery For Illustrative Purposes Only. Refer to Architectural, Civil and Landscape Drawings for Details. View Toward the North Conceptual Imagery For Illustrative Purposes Only. Refer to Architectural, Civil and Landscape Drawings for Details. View of South Side Conceptual Imagery For Illustrative Purposes Only. Refer to Architectural, Civil and Landscape Drawings for Details. View of North Side ISSUE RECORD 2021-04-19 PUD Submittal 1 2021-05-17 PUD Submittal 2 2021-05-24 PUD Submittal 3 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 42 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8b) Title: Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd.Page 43 Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Action agenda item: 8c Executive summary Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Recommended action: Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance amending Section 36-268- PUD 15 of the zoning code relating to previous development approvals for Parkway Residences phase III and to set the second reading for July 6, 2021. Policy consideration: Is the city council supportive of the amendment to PUD 15? Summary: Sela Investments, Ltd. requests a major amendment to Section 36-268-PUD 15 which established the zoning requirements for Parkway Residences, located along 31st Street West between Inglewood Avenue South and Glenhurst Avenue South. The city council approved the Parkway Residences planned unit development (PUD) in February 2020 which allowed for a 37- unit multifamily building with 26 interior parking spaces on the southeast corner of Inglewood Avenue and 31st Street West. The applicant requests a change to the PUD to add 10 additional interior parking spaces and relocate four ground floor residential units to the southeast side of the building. This change would require the relocation of four ground level units, three of which will be added to the building’s southeast side and would add 10 interior parking spaces to the building’s ground floor. The change also includes changing two studios to two two-bedroom units. Under the original approvals, the building was required to be constructed with a partial green roof and solar ready. With the changes, they will still include the partial green roof and propose installing solar panels at the time of construction. The slightly larger roof space helps accommodate the panels. The rooftop amenity deck has been removed from the plans and ground level space on the site has been redesigned to meet outdoor recreational requirements. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion Draft PUD 15 ordinance amendment June 2, 2021 draft planning commission minutes Official exhibits Email from 3125 Inglewood HOA president Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 2 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Discussion Background: In 2020, Sela Investments received approvals for Parkway Residences, a multiphase development of four new multi-family buildings adding up to 211 new units. The project also includes the preservation and rehabilitation of three existing affordable apartment buildings that contain 24 units for a project total of 235 residential units. Parkway Commons, Phase III of Parkway Residences, is located on the southeast corner of 31st Street West and Inglewood Avenue South. It was approved as a four-story, 37-unit multi-family building with 26 interior parking spaces. The original approval included four units on the ground floor facing 31st Street West, with parking located behind. The remaining 29 units were all studio and one-bedrooms spread through floors two through four. The plan included amenity space on the south side of the building, a partial green roof and ready for future solar installation. Present considerations: Sela Investments, Ltd. requests a major amendment to PUD 15 to add ten more interior parking spaces and relocate four ground floor residential units. A column of three units will be added to the building’s southeast side on floor two through four, one additional unit is added to level four and 10 more interior parking spaces would occupy the ground floor. The They would also install solar panels at the time of construction. The rooftop amenity deck has been removed from the plans and ground level space on the site has been redesigned to meet outdoor recreational requirements. Site information: Current use: vacant single-family homes Surrounding land uses: being used for construction offices North: medium and high-density multi-family East: medium density condos South: medium density multi-family West: medium density multi-family City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 3 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning RH - high density residential PUD planned unit development Zoning analysis: The proposed changes alter the exterior façade along the ground floor of 31st Street West and the building’s east elevation and have minimal impact to the overall site. The changes provide a somewhat less engaging ground floor along 31st Street West but would be consistent with the design of the two buildings east of this site. The rooftop amenity deck is removed from the plans but allows for the installation of rooftop solar, and some of the designed outdoor recreation area (DORA) has been relocated from the roof to the to the east side of the site. The zoning compliance table outlines all changes between the approved plans and the proposed amendment. The proposed changes allow for less reliance upon on-street parking, more class I architectural materials on all facades, and more electric vehicle charging stations and solar panels would be installed at the time of construction. A portion of the roof will still be constructed as a green roof, and four more canopy trees will be planted on the east side of the site to reduce any potential impact of the building changes on the neighboring properties. Zoning Compliance Table: Factor Required Approved Proposed Met? Gross Floor Area None required 41,000 SF 45,825 SF Yes Floor Area Ratio None required 1.9 2.1 Yes Building Materials Minimum 60% Class I materials on all facades. North: 79% South: 88% East: 80% West: 60% North: 80% South: 93% East: 87% West: 66% Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 1.9 2.1 Yes Off-Street Parking 1 space per bedroom Originally required: 37 Proposed required: 39 Total provided: 37 26 in garage 11 on street Total provided: 48 37 in garage 11 on street Yes EV charging Stations Originally required None PUD Amendment: 2 level 1 spaces Conduit for 4 level 2 Conduit at all interior spaces 2 level 1 spaces Conduit for all other spaces. Yes Bicycle Parking 1 per dwelling unit plus 1 per 10 automobile spaces. Total required: 41 45 47 Yes Open Area/ DORA No specific percentage with PUD 14% 12% Yes Landscaping Alternate landscape required as part of PUD Canopy Tree: 11 Shrubs: 297 Canopy Tree: 15 Shrubs: 227 Yes City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 4 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Approved 1st floor plan Proposed 1st floor plan City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 5 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Approved east building elevation Proposed east building elevation City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 6 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Neighborhood meeting: A virtual neighborhood meeting was held on May 26, 2021. Two residents attended the meeting. One person asked if the development relied on on-street parking, and another question was about the opening date of Parkway Place, which is phase I of Parkway Residences. Councilmember Rog also attended the meeting and asked several questions about changes to the elevations, offsite views and why rooftop DORA was being relocated to the ground floor outside the building. Staff also received an email from the homeowners’ association (HOA) president of the condo building located at 3125 Inglewood Avenue South asking the city to limit the building height to three stories. This email is attached to this report. Staff contacted the sender and explained that 4-stories was approved in February 2020 and described in more detail the scope of the revisions that are being considered by the planning commission and city council. Planning commission: The planning commission held a virtual public hearing on June 2, 2021. There were no callers and the commission voted 7 to 0 to recommend approval of the PUD major amendment. Next steps: The city council would hold a second reading of the ordinance on July 6, 2021 if the council approves the first reading. Recommendations: Staff recommends amending Section 36-268 PUD 15 and the Official Exhibits for Parkway Residences. 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 7 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by amending Section 36-268-PUD 15 the Planned Unit Development zoning district for the property located at 4105, 4117, and 4125 31st Street West The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendations of the planning commission (Case No: 21-22-PUD) for amending the zoning ordinance Section 36-268- PUD 15. Section 2. The Comprehensive Plan designations the following described lands as High Density Residential: Lot 1, Block 2, Manhattan Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota Section 3. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 9 is hereby amended by adding underscored text and deleting strikethrough text. Section breaks are represented by ***. Section 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, Section 36-268-PUD 15 is hereby amended to add the following changes: *** (3) Site 3 A. Site 3, legally described as Lot 1, Block 2, Manhattan Park Second Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used, and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. C3.0.0 Title Sheet 2. V3.1.0 Alta/NSPS Land Title Survey 3. C3.1.0 Removals Plan 4. C3.2.0 Site Plan 5. C3.3.0 Grading Plan 6. C3.4.0 Utility Plan 7. C3.5.0 Civil Details 8. C3.5.1 Civil Details 9. C3.5.2 Civil Details 10. SW3.1.0 SWPPP Existing Conditions 11. SW3.1.1 SWPPP Proposed Conditions 12. SW3.1.2 SWPP – Details 13. SW3.1.3 SWPPP – Narrative 14. SW3.1.4 SWPPP – Attachments 15. SW3.1.5 SWPPP - Attachments 16. 12.0 Floor Plan Level 1 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 8 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment 17. 13.0 Floor Plan Level 2 18. 14.0 Floor Plan Level 3 19. 15.0 Floor Plan Level 4 20. 15.2 Floor Plan Roof Deck 21. 16.0 Elevation – North 22. 17.0 Elevation – South 23. 18.0 Elevation – East & West 24. 23.0 DORA Site Plan 25. AL103 Photometric Plan 26. LS103 Landscape Layout Plan LS100 Layout Plan 27. LS103 Layout Plan LS101 Layout Plan 28. LP103 Planting Plan LP100 Planting Plan B. Site 3 shall also conform to the following requirements: 1. Parking shall be provided off-street in structured parking and on-street. i. A total of 26 37 parking spaces will be provided in structured parking. 2. The property shall be developed with 37 residential units. 3. The maximum building height shall not exceed 50 feet and four (4) stories 4. The site shall include a minimum 12 percent designed outdoor recreation area. *** A. Accessory uses: Accessory uses are as follows: 1. Home occupations as regulated by this chapter. Home occupations are permitted with the condition that they comply with the following conditions: i. All material or equipment shall be stored within an enclosed structure. ii. Operation of the home occupation is not apparent from the public right-of-way. iii. The activity does not involve warehousing, distribution or retail sales of merchandise produced off the site. iv. No person is employed at the residence who does not legally reside in the home except that a licensed group family day care facility may have one outside employee. v. No light of vibration originating from the business operation is discernible at the property line. vi. Only equipment, machinery and materials which are normally found in the home are used in the conduct of the home occupation. vii. No more than one non-illuminated wall sign limited to two square feet in area is used to identify the home occupation. viii. Space within the dwelling devoted to the home occupation does not exceed one room or ten percent of the floor area, whichever is greater. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 9 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment ix. No portion of the home occupation is permitted within any attached or detached accessory building. x. The structure housing the home occupation conforms to the building code; and in the case where the home occupation is day care or if there are any customers or students, the home occupation has received a certificate of occupancy. Section 5. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication (July 30, 2021) Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading June 21, 2021 Second reading July 6, 2021 Date of publication July 15, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Page 10 Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment DRAFT MINUTES Planning commission Members present: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Jessica Kraft, Sam Tift, Tom Weber, Joffrey Wilson Members absent: none Staff present: Jennifer Monson, Jacquelyn Kramer, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther, Clint Pires Guests: Dean Newins, Nick Murnane, Tim Callahan, John Kohler, Asher Michels-Allen 3b. Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Applicant: Sela Investments, Ltd. Case No: 21-22-PUD Ms. Monson presented the report. Commissioner Beneke stated the biggest change here is the reduced number of shrubs. Ms. Monson stated the shrubs are reduced but they are adding trees and a sidewalk to increase the connections. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. There were no callers. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kraft made a motion and Commissioner Beneke seconded to approve the major amendment to the PUD at Parkway Residences as presented. The motion passed 7-0. Iron FenceIron FenceWood FenceWood FenceKeystone Wall 31st Street West(A Public R/W)Inglewood Ave S(A Public R/W)S89°48'26"E 179.99S00°44'44"W 120.10N89°48'26"W 179.91N00°42'19"E 120.09(Width Varies)East Line of theWest 55 feet Lots14, 15 and 16West Line of the East55 feet of the West 110feet Lots 14, 15 and 16East Line of the West 110feet Lots 14, 15 and 16East Line of the West38.7 feet Lots 1, 2and 3CONSTRUCTION LIMITSCONSTRUCTION LIMITSPED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.MATCH EX.PVMT., TYP.MATCH EX.C&G, TYP.MATCH EX.C&G, TYP.MATCH EX.CURB, TYP.MATCH EX.CURB, TYP.CONCRETE DRIVEWAYAPRON PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.MATCH, TYP.MATCH EX.,TYP.CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.CONCRETESIDEWALK PER CITYSTANDARDS, TYP.4.3'6.0'6.1'MATCH EX.CURB, TYP.MATCH EX.CURB, TYP.6.0'6.5' 1.8'6.0'6.5'24.6'DRAINAGE ANDUTILITYEASEMENT, SEEPRELIM. PLAT5.0'5.0'10.0'CONC. WALK,TYP4'X13' CONC. PAD4 BIKE HOOPS W/8STALLSCONNECT PROPOSED CURBTO EXISTING CONCRETEVALLEY GUTTER(6) STALLS @ 22.0' = 132.0'4'X13' CONC. PADSHARED VEHICLEUSE(3) STALLS @ 22.0' = 66.0'(1) STALLS @ 22.0' = 22.0'TRANSFORMERPAD, COORD. FINALSIZING AND LOCATIONWITH UTILITY OWNER12.5'11.1'13.9'18.0'22.3'R5.0'R5.0'UPUPADADADADADAD14151617C 18C19 C202137 PARKING STALLS (7 COMPACT)47 BIKE STALLSMAIL745 SFLOBBY100A362C1N105AL1L11227 C282930 C31 C3233343537STAIR A160STAIR B161199 SFTRASH10136PARKING10525 26C34567891011 1213222324A360A1A361A1100A100B101WATER102ELEC103102103WATER104105B160161ACCESSIBLE VAN ROUTEMAINTAIN 8'-6" CLEARANCE99'-6"99'-6"100'-0"100'-0"100'-0"100'-0"99'-8"98'-6"98'-8"99'-0"100'-0"100'-0"100'-0"100'-0"100'-0"A362A11716.0'14.7'6.4'14.5'10.9' 11.7'14.5'5.0'CONC. WALK,TYP5.0'CONC. WALK,TYP5.0'Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPARKWAY COMMONS 4105-4125 31ST STREET WEST, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 4915 W. 35TH STREET, SUITE #102, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 SELA GROUP, LLC. PROJECT 48776David J. KnaebleLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.5/3/21P R E L I M I N A R Y : N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION. .. .. .. .. .. .PROJECT NUMBER:18360.0311/1/19 CITY SUBMITTAL11/26/19 CITY RESUBMITTAL12/10/1910/6/20 PRICING SET01/07/21 PRICING SET5/3/21 AMENDED PUD SUBMITTAL10/07/19 CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:KBDK. .. .. .. .. .. .. .....................20185/3/2021 11:06 AMDJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.comCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.2.0SITE PLAN. .. .. .. .. .. .SITE AREA TABLE:1.CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDINGBUT NOT LIMITED TO, LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES, EASEMENTS, SETBACKS, UTILITIES, BUILDINGSAND PAVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS OF ALL ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONSREQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NOADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY ANDSTREET OPENING PERMIT.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SITEIMPROVEMENT MATERIALS.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR REVIEW ANDAPPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS.5.LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE APPROXIMATE ANDSHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION, FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPEARCHITECT.6.CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION. LOCATIONOF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THEENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS SUCH AS,BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FORCURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLYAPPROVED.8.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH A.D.A.REQUIREMENTS-SEE DETAIL.9.CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE FLOW OFTRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5' WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN COLOR UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES.10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES-SEE DETAIL.11.ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM 3' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.12.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO SITEIMPROVEMENTS.13.FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS.14.PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.15.ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE, 4" WIDE TYP.16.BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT SECTIONS.17.ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP LINE. SEELANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS.SITE LAYOUT NOTES:SITE PLAN LEGEND:TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGSSIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY01" = 10'-0"10'-0"5'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK)SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE& CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL.PROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANLIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE &WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL.CONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOCITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.A PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITY WORK IN THE RIGHT OF WAY. CONTACT KAREN WALLAT (952.924.2548) TO OBTAIN A RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT.City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendmentPage 11 31st Street Masterplan 2 SITE 3 - BUILDING 3 AMENDED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) 05.04.21 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 12 31st Street Masterplan 3 FLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 1 Residential Circulation Lobby/Amenity Parking KEY N Scale: NTS City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 13 31st Street Masterplan 4 FLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 2 Residential Circulation Lobby/Amenity Parking KEY N Scale: NTS City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 14 31st Street Masterplan 5 FLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 3 Residential Circulation Lobby/Amenity Parking KEY N Scale: NTS City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 15 31st Street Masterplan 6 FLOOR PLANS - LEVEL 4 Residential Circulation Lobby/Amenity Parking KEY N Scale: NTS City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 16 31st Street Masterplan 7 FLOOR PLANS - ROOF Residential Circulation Lobby/Amenity Parking KEY N Scale: NTS City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 17 31st Street Masterplan 11 LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -4" LEVEL 3 123' -11 7/8" LEVEL 4 135' -7 3/4" TO. ROOF SHEATHING 147' -2 1/2" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 145' -7 3/4" Copyright2020 DJRArchitecture,Inc. ELEVATION -NORTH ST. LOUISPARK,MN PARKWAY -COMMONS (BUILDING 3) 17-115.03 05/03/21 1/16"= 1'-0" NNOORRTTHH EEXXTTEERR IIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN ELEVATIONS - NORTH Key Plan Class I Materials Square Footage Percentage BRICK GLASS STUCCO 1 COMPOSITE WOODEN RESIN PANEL 1,954 SF 2,595 SF 1,254 SF 297 SF 26 % 34 % 16 % 4 % Total: 6,100 SF 80 % MTL 2MTL 2 STU 1 BR 1 WD 1STU 1BR 1 Class II Materials Square Footage Percentage METAL PANEL 2 1,543 SF 20 % Total: 1,543 SF 20 % Overall Total: 7,643 SF 100% City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 18 31st Street Masterplan 12 ELEVATIONS - SOUTH LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -4" LEVEL 3 123' -11 7/8" LEVEL 4 135' -7 3/4" TO. ROOF SHEATHING 147' -2 1/2" T.O. PARAPET 149' -8 1/2" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 145' -7 3/4" Copyright2020 DJRArchitecture,Inc. ELEVATION -SOUTH ST. LOUISPARK,MN PARKWAY -COMMONS (BUILDING 3) 17-115.03 05/03/21 1/16"= 1'-0" SSOOUUTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN Class I Materials Square Footage Percentage BRICK GLASS STUCCO 1 1,739 SF 2,233 SF 3,003 SF 23 % 30 % 40 % Total: 6,975 SF 93 % Key Plan STU 1 BR 1STU 1 MTL 2 Class II Materials Square Footage Percentage METAL PANEL 2 471 SF 7 % Total: 471 SF 7 % Overall Total: 7,446 SF 100% City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 19 31st Street Masterplan 13 ELEVATIONS - WEST LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -4" LEVEL 3 123' -11 7/8" LEVEL 4 135' -7 3/4" TO. ROOF SHEATHING 147' -2 1/2" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 145' -7 3/4" Copyright2020 DJRArchitecture,Inc. ELEVATION-EAST/WEST ST. LOUISPARK,MN PARKWAY -COMMONS (BUILDING 3) 17-115.03 05/03/21 1/16" = 1'-0" EEAASSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 1/16" = 1'-0" WWEESSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN Class I Materials Square Footage Percentage BRICK GLASS COMPOSITE WOODEN RESIN PANEL STUCCO 1 552 SF 872 SF 295 SF 1,514 SF 16 % 18 % 6 % 31 % Total: 3,233 SF 60 % Key Plan STU 1 BR 1STU 1 WD 1 BR 1 ELEVATIONS - EAST Class I Materials Square Footage Percentage BRICK GLASS STUCCO 1 126 SF 1,087 SF 2,909 SF 2 % 23 % 62 % Total: 4,122 SF 87 % MTL 2WD 1 MTL 2 Class II Materials Square Footage Percentage METAL PANEL 2 1,633 SF 40 % Total: 1,633 SF 40 % Overall Total: 4,866 SF 100% Class II Materials Square Footage Percentage METAL PANEL 2 596 SF 13 % Total: 596 SF 13% Overall Total: 4,718 SF 100% City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 20 31st Street Masterplan 14 MODEL IMAGES Corner View from 31st Street & Inglewood City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 21 31st Street Masterplan 15 MODEL IMAGES View from 31st Street City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 22 31st Street Masterplan 16 MODEL IMAGES View from the Northeast corner City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 23 31st Street Masterplan 17 MODEL IMAGES View from the Southwest corner City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 24 31st Street Masterplan 18 5,489 SF 6,960 SF 160 SF 1,166 sf 525 sf DORA CALCULATIONSBUILDING 1: Lot Size: 57,077 sfRequired: 6,849 sf; 12 %Provided: 8,066 sf; 14 %BUILDING 2:Lot Size: 10,375 sfRequired: 1,245 sf; 12 %Provided: 2,070 sf; 20 %BUILDING 3:Lot size: 21,610 sfRequired: 2,593 sf; 12 %Provided: 2,600 sf; 12 %BUILDING 4:Lot Size: 25,895 sfRequired: 3,107 sf; 12 %Provided: 5,489 sf; 21 % 553 SF + 553 SF 1,274 SF 300 sf 1,245 sf AMENITY ROOF DECK RECREATIONAL AREA AMENITY YARD GAMES DOG RUN SEATING AREA AMENITY ROOF DECK OUTDOOR SEATING YARD GAMES AND SEATING AREA DORA CALCULATIONS BUILDING 3: LOT SIZE: 21,610 SF REQUIRED: 2,593 SF; 12 % PROVIDED: 2,600 SF; 12 % SOLAR PANEL LOCATIONS SOLAR PANELS TO BE PROVIDED ON THE ROOF AT THE LOCATIONS SHOWN City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 25 5SH25SH5SH5SHUPUPADADADADADADU6U6Xref N:\2019\19069_31st Street West\19069_WORKING\AUTOCAD\ARCH\2021-05-03\17-115-03 - Building 3 - Parkway Commons_gnorrisLADTQ - Floor Plan - LEVEL 1.dwg3BF37ck7TR2TA70ck22Ty46aa5RO15Hm18Hm37aa4Dl38ck117Dl18Ty37Ra1TRFile Location: N:\2019\19069_31st Street West\19069_WORKING\AUTOCAD\SHEETS\PARKWAY COMMONS- Building 3\PARKWAY COMMONS - LP100 PLANTING PLAN / DRawn by: XX / Checked by: XX LP100PLANTINGPLANPLANTING SCHEDULE - PARKWAY COMMONS (BUILDING 3)10'20'5'2.5'0'1"=10'SCALE:01LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN - PARKWAY COMMONS (BUILDING 3) FLOOR 110'20'5'2.5'0'1"=10'SCALE:02LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN - PARKWAY COMMONS (BUILDING 3) FLOOR 2St. Louis Park, MN17-115DJRARCHITECTURE, INC333 Washington Ave N, Suite 210Minneapolis, Minnesota 55401612.676.2700 www.djr-inc.com530 N.THIRD STREETMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401PH: 612.333.3702LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTCONFLUENCECity council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendmentPage 26 From:Gary Shibrowski To:ebjorum@dir-inc.com; Jennifer Monson Cc:Rader John; Anne; Dave Hofstad; Norbert Schiller; Rizzo Kristin; Hemady schiller Zina; JOANN MELLEM; Valli Arunachalam; narayan arun; Brenner Andrew Subject:Parkway Development changes for 31 st/ Inglewood proposed building site Date:Tuesday, May 25, 2021 10:33:35 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Erik/ Jennifer, On behalf of the homeowners at 3125 Inglewood I am submitting our comments for both the May 26 and June 2 meetings on the Parkway Proposed Development change request and would like these shared on our behalf during the meeting. I will reference our building at 3125 Inglewood as IBC going forward for reference. IBC was built in 2008 and residents have owned for over 10 years. The building and zoning restrictions had a direct impact on building height and other design changes. Since then our adjoining neighbors on 31st have also built two similar buildings both of max height of 3 story, etc. The city has approved and zoned for buildings on the north side of 31st to Hwy 7 to be multi unit large scale rentals. The proposed changes requested by Parkway creates new concerns for us homeowners. The height of the building will dwarf IBC and surrounding buildings and impact direct light and significantly change the view from soft greenery to towering building hardscape. The proposed impacts all three adjoining buildings which are owned homes/units and not 100% rentals. The height restrictions for the existing buildings of 3 story must remain, you can not allow this building to be higher. Adding 37 units to this small footprint will impact parking, congestion, street traffic, etc. the approved plan fits within the surrounding existing area. The proposed changes do not. The drawings provided in the notice do not show or represent the actual building layout to the property lines and the “new” distance between existing homeowners and the proposed building at ground level or above. IBC owners not opposed to uniform building design but height is a concern. Adding units but limiting height to max 3 story (as mandated to existing building developers and owners) is necessary and fair. This is including the common garage space so two floors of living like the existing 3 buildings adjoining the proposed building site. We would like to understand any other special variances or changes requested and approved. In summary, the homeowners of IBC do not support and urge the city to also not approve the requested changes. IBC Homeowners Gary Shibrowski IBC HOA president City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8c) Title: Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Page 27 Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Action agenda item: 8d Executive summary Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Recommended actions: •Motion to adopt Resolution approving the amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map, as well as related figures, tables and text (requires 5 affirmative votes); •Motion to adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for Rise on 7 Addition (requires 4 affirmative votes); •Motion to approve first reading of Ordinance adding section 36-268-PUD 19 to the zoning code and amending the zoning map from RC high-density multi-family residential to PUD 19 and set the second reading for July 6, 2021 (requires 5 affirmative votes), subject to the conditions recommended by staff to be included in the planning development contract. Policy consideration: Does city council support the proposed development? Summary: The applicant, CommonBond Communities, proposes a five-story mixed-use building on the site of the former Prince of Peace church at 8115 State Highway No. 7, which is just north of the border with the City of Hopkins. The project includes a daycare and 120 dwelling units. The applicant requests: •A change the comprehensive plan future land use designation of the site from civic to high density residential. •A preliminary and final plat that would create one 2.44-acre parcel and dedicate public right-of-way and easements. •A preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). Financial or budget considerations: CommonBond applied to the economic development authority (EDA) for tax increment financing (TIF) assistance. The exact amount of assistance needed for the development won’t be known until other financing sources have been secured, at which point, staff will present a more definitive recommendation for TIF assistance. To bolster its upcoming financing application to the Minnesota Housing Finance Authority, CommonBond requested a resolution of financial support from the EDA for TIF assistance should it prove necessary. A resolution will be presented at the July 6, 2021 EDA meeting. The parks and recreation advisory board recommends collecting $184,950 in park dedication fees in-lieu of park land and $27,000 in trail dedication fees. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion; Comprehensive plan amendment resolution; Preliminary and final plat resolution; PUD amendment ordinance; Unofficial planning commission minutes; Neighborhood meeting minutes; Email feedback; Development plans Prepared by: Jacquelyn Kramer, associate planner Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 2 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Discussion Background: The existing building at 8115 State Highway No. 7 was built in 1955 and used as a place of worship and a daycare. The applicant purchased the property in February 2020. The existing building is currently vacant and would be demolished. The applicant proposes demolishing the existing building and developing the site with a five- story mixed-use building. The project would include a daycare and 120 dwelling units that will be affordable at a range of 30 to 80 percent of the area median income (AMI). The plan proposes accessing the site from the Highway 7 frontage road and provides parking in a surface lot on the north side of the building and one level of structured parking on the ground floor of the building. The plan includes two outdoor play areas, one for the daycare and another for residents, as well as an outdoor recreation area. Other proposed site improvements include new landscaping, an underground stormwater management system and a 20kw rooftop solar array. Inclusionary housing policy: All of the proposed housing would be affordable housing. The housing unit mix includes one, two and three bedrooms. The apartments would be rented to income qualifying residents ranging from between 30 and 80 percent of the area median income (AMI). This level of affordability exceeds the minimum requirement of the city’s inclusionary housing policy. Climate action plan: Rise on 7 would comply with the city’s green building policy. The developer would seek certification through the Enterprise Green Communities program. The project also proposes a 20kw rooftop solar array. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 3 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Site information: Site area (acres): 2.44 acres Current use: Surrounding land uses: Vacant (previously church and daycare) North: right of way, commercial East: commercial South: single family residential West: commercial Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning CIV - civic R-C high-density multiple-family residence Proposed 2040 land use guidance Proposed zoning RH - high density residential PUD planned unit development Present considerations: The applicant requests that the city: 1. Amend the comprehensive plan 2040 land use map to change the future land use designation from civic to high density residential. 2. Approve a preliminary and final plat to create one 2.44-acre parcel and dedicate additional right-of-way. 3. Amend the zoning map and zoning ordinance to rezone the subject property from R-C high-density multiple-family residence to PUD planned unit development. 8115 Highway 7 City of Hopkins Knollwood Shopping Center North City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 4 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Comprehensive plan amendment: The applicant requests a change to the future land use designation of the development site from CIV – civic to RH – high density residential. Below is an exhibits map showing the proposed change to the future land use map. The request for amending the city’s land use plan should be evaluated from the perspective of land use planning principles and community goals. These reflect the community’s long-range vision and broad goals about what kind of community it wants to be and what makes strong neighborhoods. This request is driven by a specific development proposal. The request is for residential development at density of approximately 49 units per acre, which is considered high density (RH) in the comprehensive plan. The amendment may be evaluated independently of the development proposal against the goals of the comprehensive plan for the subject property. The amendment itself does not permit the proposed development but is one step in the approvals process. General consistency with the comprehensive plan The city’s land use plan should reflect the broad goals, policies and implementation strategies incorporated in the comprehensive plan. These elements are the basis for evaluating the requested change. Staff identified the following goals in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan that are applicable to the proposed application: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 5 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Livable Communities Goal 2: Promote building and site design that creates a connected, human scale, multimodal, and safe environment for people who live and work here. • Encourage quality design in new construction such as building orientation, scale, massing, and pedestrian access. • Encourage new buildings to orient to walkable streets with appropriate building height to street width ratios. Residential land Use Goal 1: Create a mix of residential land uses and housing types to increase housing choices, including affordable housing, and increase the viability of neighborhood services through redevelopment or infill development. • Engage the community to determine how to allow a broader range of housing types and densities within and adjacent to existing low-density residential neighborhoods that are complementary and compatible with the existing neighborhood character • Promote and support the development of medium and high-density residential land uses near commercial centers and nodes. • Ensure that new and redeveloped medium and high-density residential land uses are located within walking distance of transit and commercial services. Housing Goal 1: The City of St. Louis Park will promote and facilitate a balanced and enduring housing stock that offers a continuum of diverse lifecycle housing choices suitable for households of all income levels including, but not limited to affordable, senior, multi- generational, supportive and mixed income housing, disbursed throughout the city. • Create a broad range of housing types to provide more diverse and creative housing choices to meet the needs of current and future residents. • Use infill and redevelopment opportunities to assist in meeting housing goals. Housing Goal 3: The city is committed to promoting quality multi-family developments, both rental and owner occupied, in appropriate locations, including near transit centers, retail and employment centers and in commercial mixed-use districts. • Promote high-quality architectural design in the construction of new multi-family developments. Housing Goal 4: The city is committed to creating, preserving, and improving the city’s rental housing stock. • Promote the inclusion of family-sized units (2 and 3 bedroom) in newly constructed multi-family developments. • Minimize the involuntary displacement of people of color, indigenous people, and vulnerable populations, such as low-income households, the elderly, and people with disabilities from their communities as neighborhoods grow and change Housing Goal 6: The city is committed to promoting affordable housing options for low- and moderate-income households. • Ensure affordable housing is disbursed throughout the city and not concentrated in any one area. • Promote the inclusion of affordable housing in new developments, including those located near the Southwest Light Rail Transit Corridor and other transit nodes, retail and employment centers and commercial mixed-use districts. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 6 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Housing goal 7: Preservation, Safety and Sustainability: The city is committed to ensuring all housing is safe and well maintained. • Strategy C: Encourage the use of green building practices, energy-efficient products, and sustainable methods in both single-family and multi-family housing construction. Climate and energy goal 1: Pursue the 2040 Climate Action Plan (CAP) goals to reduce greenhouse gases that are either emitted within the city’s boundary (Scope 1 emissions) or emitted directly through the purchase of electricity or other energy sources (Scope 2 emissions). • Strategy F: Protect solar access in new developments to enable potential developments of solar energy systems. • Reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by encouraging residents and businesses to replace existing vehicles with more fuel-efficient models, including electric vehicles (EVs) and by expanding EV charging infrastructure. Availability of infrastructure • Water and sewer: The development proposes using city and sewer infrastructure on Division Street, which is owned by the city of Hopkins. City of St. Louis Park staff find based on the size of the mains in Division Street the public water and sewer infrastructure in the area will be adequate to serve the proposed development. St. Louis Park city staff are working with Hopkins city staff to ensure the existing infrastructure in the area can support the project; they have not raised any concerns about the service capacity. • Traffic: The site will be accessed to and from the Highway 7 frontage road that connects to Texas Avenue. Most of the traffic from the site will go north on Texas to Highway 7, rather than through the single-family neighborhood to the south. Staff find the surrounding street network has capacity to accommodate the development. • Stormwater: City engineering staff find that the development complies with stormwater requirements. The applicant will be required to obtain both city and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permits prior to construction. Impacts to surrounding properties and the physical character of the neighborhood Removal of the existing building and redevelopment of the parcel will change the character of the site. North of the development site is Highway 7 and Knollwood shopping center. East and west of the project site are commercial properties, and there is a predominantly single-family neighborhood to the south of the site in the City of Hopkins. The presence of a variety of commercial uses complements the proposed high-density residential component of the development. The daycare use is compatible with the nearby residential uses as well as the commercial uses to the north of the site and a daycare previously operated at this location as an accessory use to the church; daycares are in high demand in the community. Approving the comprehensive plan 2040 land use map amendment will allow for additional housing units, including 2-and 3-bedroom units. The project would provide affordable housing on a site that is well served by nearby goods and services and has a vacant building on it. The 2040 comprehensive plan includes the city’s livable community principles, which provide policy direction that allows mixed use land use designations to achieve high residential densities. These principles include structured parking, affordable housing, sustainable site and building design elements, and high quality attractive indoor/outdoor recreation and amenity areas. Staff find the Rise on 7 project meets these livable communities principles, and the RH - City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 7 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project high density residential land use is consistent with the present RC - high density multiple family residential zoning of the property. Staff finds the goals and policies of the 2040 comprehensive plan support guiding this property for RH – high density residential land use. Regional policy. Metropolitan Council review of this comprehensive plan amendment is required. The Met Council must authorize the city to put an amendment into effect. Staff expect that a change to allow a residential density of up to 75 units per acre of housing on this site would be viewed favorably by Metropolitan Council. Preliminary and final plat analysis: CommonBond Communities seeks preliminary and final plat approval to create one parcel from unplatted land. Lot: Lot 1, Block 1, Rise on 7 will have a lot area of 106,459 square feet or 2.44 acres. The proposed residential density for the site is 49.2 units/acre. Right-of-way dedication: The plat dedicates 688.13 square feet right of way to the frontage road and 15,203.87 square feet of right of way to Division Street. Easements: Drainage and utility easements are provided along all property lines as per the requirements of the city’s subdivision ordinance, including five-foot easements are along interior property lines and ten-foot easements abutting city rights-of-way. Sidewalks: The city code requires sidewalks along all public streets. New six-foot wide sidewalks would be installed along the north side of the property along the frontage road, and the south side of the property along Division Street. Staff are working to ensure adequate sidewalk connections are made on adjacent properties per the direction of the planning commission. Park and trail dedication: No new parks are designated for this area in the comprehensive plan; therefore, cash-in-lieu of land is recommended by staff. The 2021 fee schedule sets the residential park dedication feet at $1,500 per dwelling unit and the trail dedication fee at $225 per dwelling unit. Park dedication fees for commercial uses are five percent of current market value of the commercial portion of the unimproved land, as determined by the city assessor. Park and trail dedication fees will need to be collected for all 120 new dwelling units; park dedication fees will be collected for the 6,600 square feet of daycare. Total park and trail dedication fees for the Rise on 7 will be $211,950. The parks and recreation advisory commission (PRAC) recommended approval of the park and trail dedications for the proposed development on May 19, 2021. Staff find the preliminary and final plat meet city requirements. Preliminary and final planned unit development: The developer requests approval of a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). A PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment that established the regulations for a specific property. The site is currently zoned R-C high-density multiple-family residence. Below is an excerpt from the zoning map showing the boundaries of the existing zoning and the proposed PUD zoning district. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 8 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Building and site design analysis: Staff find Rise on 7 meets the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the city to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff find the plan meets this requirement. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff find the application meets this requirement. (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. The project will comply with the green building policy. This criterion will be met. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. A solar array installation will be included as part of the development. This criterion will be met. RC High-Density Multiple-Family Residence City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 9 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project (5) A PUD shall comply with the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy. The applicant proposes a 100% affordable housing development with a range of affordability from 30% to 80% AMI. This proposal meets and exceeds the requirements of the inclusionary housing policy. This criterion will be met. Zoning analysis: The following table provides the development metrics. The property will be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans, establish the development requirements for this property if approved. Zoning compliance table: Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Set by PUD ordinance Multi-family residential, group daycare/nursery Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres 2.44 acres Yes Height Set by PUD ordinance 5 stories, 53.67 feet Yes Building Materials Minimum 60% Class I materials on all facades. Requirement met. Yes Density (units per acre High Density Residential Max allowed: 75 per acre 49 units per acre Yes Ground Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 0.32 Yes Floor Area Ratio None with PUD 1.39 Yes Off-Street Parking Total required: 220 Residential: 1 space per bedroom Daycare: 1 per 10 children + 1 per 2 employees Total provided: 168 Surface: 96 Structured: 72 (parking reductions requested) See analysis below Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE) 10% level 1 EVSE (22 stalls) 1 level 2 EVSE Conduit for 10% future level 1 EVSE 22 level one EVSE 1 level two EVSE Conduit for 10% future level 1 EVSE Yes Bicycle Parking Total required: 144 1 per dwelling unit plus 1 per 10 automobile spaces. Total Provided: 144 Exterior: 18 Interior: 126 Yes Open Area/ DORA No specific percentage with PUD 12% Yes Landscaping Replacement diameter: 177 caliper inches Replacement provided: 212 caliper inches See analysis below City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 10 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Factor Required Proposed Met? New plantings required: Trees: 126 Shrubs: 1,003 Plantings provided: Trees: 78 Shrubs: 243 + alternative landscaping features to satisfy this requirement. Setbacks Set by PUD Front (north): 57.9 feet Rear (south): 30 feet Side (east): 21.9 feet Side (west): 48 feet Yes Mechanical Equipment Full screening required Yes Sidewalks Required along all street frontages Yes Refuse handling Full screening required. Project will comply with city’s solid waste ordinance, including providing recycling receptacles. Yes Stormwater Management Meet state and city requirements Yes Uses: Rise on 7 is a single-phase development with one mixed-use building. The ground floor includes 6,600 of daycare space, which will provide childcare at affordable rates for half the children that attend. Approximately fifteen of the spaces will be reserved for families living on the property. The residential component of the building includes a mix of one-, two-, and three- bedroom units. Unit Type Number of Units Number of Bedrooms One-bedroom 57 57 Two-bedroom 39 78 Three-bedroom 24 72 Total 120 207 Access: The plan proposes two driveways onto the Highway 7 frontage road. Delivery trucks will park by the main door off the parking lot to access the parcel room. Moving trucks could use the south building entry off Division Street or the main door from the parking lot. New sidewalk will be installed along the north and south property lines adjacent to the roads and throughout the site connecting the surface parking lot and outdoor recreation areas to building entrances. Architectural design: The building will comply with the architectural design requirements in the zoning ordinance including architectural materials, ground floor window transparency for commercial uses and shadowing requirements. The proposed exterior materials are made up of predominantly two contrasting colors of brick and glass. The building will also utilize two colors of cement board lap siding and integrally colored rockface concrete. Vehicular parking: The proposed plan includes 96 parking spaces in a surface lot north of the building and 72 spaces in one level of structured parking on the ground floor of the building, for a total of 168 off-street parking spaces. The development proposes 207 bedrooms and a childcare facility serving approximately 60 children with 14 employees. The zoning code parking formulas would require 220 parking stalls. The code allows for parking requirements to be revised upward or downward by city council as part of a PUD based on verifiable information City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 11 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project pertaining to parking. In addition, the code allows parking reductions based on shared parking and available on-street parking adjacent to the property. Staff’s analysis is described below. • Three-bedroom units, particularly in an affordable housing development such as this, typically rent to families rather than adult roommates, who may potentially each own a vehicle. Staff find it appropriate to reduce the parking requirements for three-bedroom units in this development from three spaces to two. • Division Street could accommodate up to 20 on-street parking spaces on the north side of the street adjacent to the development. Staff support a parking reduction given the availability of these parking spaces. The daycare will operate during the day, so the peak time for daycare parking will be concentrated during the morning and early evening rush hours. The peak time for residential parking will be overnight. This presents an opportunity for shared parking. • The site is within ¼ mile of Metro Transit Route 17 and about ½-mile from the future Blake Road light rail transit station. The daycare is eligible for a 10% reduction in required parking based on the proximity transit service and the current bus frequency. • The applicant indicated fifteen of the spots in the daycare will be reserved for families living in the development, which further reduces the demand for on-site parking. Based on these factors, staff support a 25% parking reduction from 220 spaces to 168 spaces for this development. The table below quantifies the proposed parking reductions. Reduction Percent reduction Number of stalls Three-bedroom units 12% of residential parking 24 Available on-street parking 9% of total parking 20 Transit proximity (daycare only) 10% of daycare parking 1 Shared parking + on-site daycare users 7% of total parking 7 Total 25% of total parking 52 Bicycle parking: There would be 18 exterior bike loops at the north, south and daycare building entrances, and three bike storage rooms containing 42 spaces each for a total of 144 bicycle parking spaces. This meets the bicycle parking requirements. Electric vehicle supply equipment (EVSE): The proposed EVSE meets the zoning requirements. One level 2 charging station is located at the main entry, 22 level 1 charging stations are in the structured parking garage, and capacity and conduit for 22 additional level 2 charging stations will be provided in the electrical plans. Building readiness: the plan provides fiber infrastructure per city policy. Staff recommendations regarding parking garage security features and adequate public safety radio coverage will also be incorporated into the construction documents and development agreements. Screening of mechanical equipment: Other than the solar panels, the only rooftop mechanical equipment are air conditioner compressors. Any equipment that is visible from the ground within 400 feet of the property will be provided with screening fences that extend 1 foot above the equipment. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 12 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Landscaping: The zoning ordinance requires 126 trees and 1,003 shrubs on the site. The plans propose 83 trees and 243 shrubs. The zoning ordinance allows alternative landscaping design features and flexibility to meet the landscaping goals. The current project plans preserve existing trees along the western property line. The applicant also proposes to construct a bioswale and native plantings along the western yard of the property. Designed outdoor recreation area (DORA): There is no minimum DORA requirement for planned unit developments. The project provides 12% of the total site area as DORA in two outdoor child play areas, seating areas near the building entrances, a patio area south of the building, and two outdoor green play spaces south of the building. This is compatible with the minimum requirement in other zoning districts. Stormwater: The storm water will be managed in a new underground stormwater treatment system. Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permits will be required before the city issues building permits. Signs: A sign plan was not submitted for review. The site will be required to adhere to the sign requirements for the R-C high density multiple family residence zoning district. Pylon signs will be prohibited. Public outreach: The applicant held a virtual neighborhood meeting on April 8, 2021. About 35 people attended the meeting, including the project team, city staff, and Councilmembers Lynette Dumalag and Rachel Harris. Please see the attached meeting minutes. All properties within 500 feet of the proposed development were notified by mail of the neighborhood meeting and the public hearing. A legal notice was published in the official newspaper regarding the public hearing. Project and meeting information was shared through city social media accounts and the city website. A “proposed development” sign with contact information was posted on the property. At the time of this report staff have received five emails regarding the project. Two emails are opposed to the project design at the time of the public hearing, and three emails are supportive of the project. Please see the attached emails. Planning commission and public hearing: Planning commission held a public hearing on May 19, 2021. Five people testified. One caller supported the development. One caller supported affordable housing on the site but had concerns about the design and three other callers also raised concerns. Their concerns were primarily about traffic, visibility to adjacent storefronts, parking and pedestrian safety. With regard to traffic, the primary concern was the potential delays drivers may experience that are travelling eastbound on the frontage road and turning left onto northbound Texas Avenue South. On May 19, the commission recommended approval of the comprehensive plan amendment and preliminary and final plat, and tabled action on the PUD pending additional information and revisions from the applicant. On June 2, 2021 planning commission reviewed revised and supplemental plans and recommended approval of the preliminary and final PUD. Please see the attached unofficial meeting minutes. Parks and recreation advisory commission (PRAC): On May 19, 2021, PRAC recommended approval of park and trail dedication fees in lieu of park land dedication. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 13 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Next steps: If approved, city council will hold a second reading of the PUD ordinance on July 6, 2021. Recommendations: Planning commission and staff recommend approval of the Rise on 7 comprehensive plan amendment. Planning Commission and staff recommend approval of the Rise on 7 preliminary and final plat subject to the conditions listed in the resolution of approval. Planning commission and staff recommend approval of the preliminary and final planned unit development for Rise on 7 subject to the following conditions: 1. City council approval of the comprehensive plan amendment to high density residential and Metropolitan Council authorization of the comprehensive plan amendment associated with the development applications. 2. City staff and applicant will develop a parking management plan for the project. 3. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 4. All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off-site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 5. The on-site underground storm water management systems shall be privately-owned and privately maintained. Access to the system shall be provided to the city for clean- out and inspection purposes when warranted. 6. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. b. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. c. All necessary permits shall be obtained. 7. Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a. The developer shall sign the City's Assent Form and the Official Exhibits. b. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the Developer and City that addresses, at a minimum: i. The conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate. ii. Alternative landscaping requirements. iii. The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. iv. Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure. v. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (sidewalks and City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 14 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project boulevards), and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. vi. The developer shall reimburse City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final PUD approval. vii. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. c. Final construction plans for all public improvements and private stormwater system shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. d. Building material samples and colors shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. e. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (sidewalks, boulevards, etc.) and landscaping. f. The developer shall pay to the city the park dedication fee of $180,000 for residential uses, park dedication fee of $4,950 for the daycare use, and trail dedication fee of $27,000 for residential uses. 8. The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b. The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c. Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d. The City shall be contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e. Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the City Engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f. The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. g. Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 9. Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the following shall be completed: a. Public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation, and storm water management system shall be installed in accordance with the Official Exhibits. 10. The materials used in, and placement of, all signs shall be integrated with the building design and architecture. 11. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 15 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution supporting the approval of an amendment to the 2040 comprehensive plan for the City of St. Louis Park under Minnesota Statutes 462.351 to 462.364 for the property located at 8115 Highway 7 Whereas, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on August 5, 2019; and Whereas, the use of said Plan will insure a safer, more pleasant, and more economical environment for residential, commercial, industrial, and public activities and will promote the public health, safety and general welfare; and Whereas, said Plan will prepare the community for anticipated desirable change, thereby bringing about significant savings in both private and public expenditures; and Whereas, said Plan has taken due cognizance of the planning activities of adjacent units of government; and Whereas, said Plan is to be periodically reviewed by the City of St. Louis Park Planning Commission and amendments made, if justified according to procedures, rules, and laws, and provided such amendments would provide a positive result and are consistent with other provisions in the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended adoption of an amendment to said Plan on May 19, 2021; and Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission; and Whereas, the contents of Planning Case File 21-16-CP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case; and Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of St. Louis Park that said Plan, as previously adopted by the City Council, is hereby amended as follows and as shown in the attached exhibits: Change the future land use designation for the property at 8115 Highway 7 (PID:18-117- 21-44-0006) from CIV – Civic to RH – High Density Residential; Changes to the text, tables and figures within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan document as shown in the attachments to reflect updates to city forecasts and development phasing based on the change in land use; changes within the document are found on the following pages: 5-126 and 5-129. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 16 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Be it further resolved, city staff are instructed to submit the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review and authorization to place the Comprehensive Plan Amendment into effect. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 17 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project 5-126: Figure 5-5. 2040 Future Land Use Plan City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 18 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project 5-129: Table 5.2 2040 Future Land Use Plan Future Land Use Gross Acres Net Acres % Net RL - Low Density Residential 2,520.67 2,484.21 35.96% RM - Medium Density Residential 396.31 380.05 5.50% RH – High Density Residential 217.75 220.19 209.11 211.55 3.03% 3.06% MX - Mixed Use 52.81 52.81 0.76% TOD - Transit Oriented Development 81.76 81.76 1.18% COM - Commercial 255.41 255.08 3.69% OFC - Office 232.31 215.16 3.11% BP - Business Park 103.81 103.65 1.50% IND - Industrial 237.82 199.64 2.89% CIV - Civic 216.29 213.85 210.70 208.26 3.05% 3.01% PRK - Park and Open Space 916.67 557.54 8.07% ROW - Right of Way 1,517.14 1,508.78 21.84% RRR - Railroad 159.98 150.81 2.18% Water/Wetlands - 499.45 7.23% Total 6,908.74 6,908.74 100.00% City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 19 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution approving preliminary and final plat of Rise on 7 Addition Whereas, CB SLP Holding LLC, owner and subdivider of land proposed to be platted at Rise on 7 has submitted an application for approval of preliminary and final plat in the manner required for platting of land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Coe, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and Whereas, the proposed plat is situated upon lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in “Exhibit A” attached hereto. Whereas, legal notice was published in the official newspaper and mailed to property owners within 500 feet of the subject property at least 10 days prior to the scheduled public hearing regarding the application; and Whereas, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 19, 2021, and the commission voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the preliminary and final plat with conditions; and Whereas, the proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park; and Now therefore be it resolved the proposed preliminary and final plat of Rise on 7 Addition is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification by the City Clerk and subject to the following conditions: 1. City council approval of the comprehensive plan amendment to high density residential and Metropolitan Council authorization of the comprehensive plan amendment associated with the development applications. 2. The site shall be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 3. Prior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: a. A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitted to the city to ensure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the city. b. A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the city and developer that addresses, at a minimum: i. The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, landscaping and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. ii. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 20 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), placement of iron monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. iii. The applicant shall reimburse City Attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. iv. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Planning Development Contract. c. Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. 4. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. The developer shall pay to the city the park dedication fee of $180,000 for residential uses, park dedication fee of $4,950 for the daycare use, and trail dedication fee of $27,000 for residential uses. b. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. c. Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. d. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. e. All necessary permits shall be obtained. f. A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (sidewalks, boulevards, etc.) and landscaping. It is further resolved The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to the above-named subdivider, who is the applicant herein. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth have been fulfilled. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required under Section 26- 123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council June 21, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 21 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Exhibit A: legal description The West 510.5 feet of the East 670.5 feet of the South 238 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 117 North, of Range 21 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, according to the Government Survey thereof. AND That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 117 North. of Range 21 West of the Fifth P.M., described as follows: Commencing at a point distant 160 feet from the East line of said section and 238 feet North from the South line of said section; thence West, parallel with the South line of said section, to a point in the Southeasterly line of State Highway No. 7; thence Northeasterly along said Southeasterly line of said Highway to a point in a line running Northwesterly from the point of beginning and parallel with the Southwesterly line of the triangular tract of the State Highway at the Southwesterly corner of the intersection of said State Highway No. 7 with Texas Avenue; thence Southeasterly to beginning, according to the map or plot thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds in and for said county and state. EXCEPT The West 50 feet of the West 510.5 feet of the East 670.5 feet of the South 238 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 18, Township 117 North, of Range 21 West of the Fifth Principal Meridian, according to Government Survey thereof. Hennepin County, Minnesota City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 22 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Ordinance No. ___-21 Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park City Code relating to zoning by creating Section 36-28 PUD 19 as a Planned Unit Development Zoning District for the property located at 8115 Highway 7 The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (Case No. 21-18-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-268-PUD 19. Section 2. The city council voted on June 21, 2021 to approve Resolution No. ____ amending the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the future land use designation for the subject property located at 8115 Highway 7 from Civic to High Density Residential. Said comprehensive plan amendment is associated with this ordinance and requires Metropolitan Council review and authorization to put it into effect. Section 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from R-C High-Density Multiple-Family Residence to PUD 19: Lot 1, Block 1, Rise on 7, Hennepin County, Minnesota Section 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 26-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: Section 36-268-PUD 19 a) Development Plans The site located on property legally described at Lot 1, Block 1, Rise on 7, Hennepin County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used, and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1. Survey 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Final Plat 4. C1-1 Demolition Plan 5. C2-1 Site Plan 6. C3-1 Grading Plan 7. C3-2 SWPPP 8. C3-3 SWPPP Notes 9. C4-1 Sanitary & Watermain 10. C4-2 Storm Sewer 11. L1-1 Landscape Plan 12. Landscape Details 13. Lighting Plan 14. A000 Cover Sheet 15. A300 Level 0 Plan 16. A310 Level 1 Plan City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 23 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project 17. A320 Level 2 Plan 18. A330 Level 3 Plan 19. A340 Level 4 Plan 20. A500 Exterior Elevations 21. A501 Exterior Elevations 22. A502 Exterior Elevations 23. A121 Shadow Study The site shall also conform to the following requirements: 1. The property shall be developed with 120 dwelling units and 6,600 square feet of commercial space. 2. The property shall include 167 off-street parking spaces. 3. The maximum height shall not exceed 55 feet and five (5) stories. 4. The site shall contain a minimum of 12 percent of the lot area as designed outdoor recreation area b) Uses 1. Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in PUD 19: a. Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple-family dwellings, including but not limited to, the residential leasing and property management office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly room or general amenity space. b. Group daycare/nursery schools complying with the following conditions: i. At least 40 square feet of outside play space per pupil is provided. ii. The outside play areas are enclosed with a fence. iii. Dropoff and loading points are established which do not interfere with traffic and pedestrian movements. 2. Accessory uses. Accessory uses are as follows: a. Home occupations as regulated by this chapter. b. Gardens. c. Parking lots. d. Public transit stops/shelters. e. Outdoor seating, public address (PA) systems are prohibited. f. Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited. g. Accessory utility structures including: i. Small wind energy conversion system as defined in 36-4 Definitions. ii. Solar energy systems. A solar energy system with a supporting framework that is either place on, or anchored in, the ground and that is independent of any building or other structure; or that is affixed to or an integral part of a principal or accessory building, including but not limited to photovoltaic or hot water solar energy systems which are contained within roofing materials, windows, skylights, and awnings. iii. Cisterns and rainwater collection systems. c) Special Performance Standards 1. All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking, and screening requirements. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 24 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project 2. All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. 3. Signs shall be allowed in conformance with the sign regulations for the R-C High Density Multiple-Family Residence Zoning District and shall comply with the following: i. Pylon signs shall be prohibited. Section 5. The contents of Planning Case File 21-16-CP, 21-17-S, 21-18-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment approved by City Council resolution ___ and not sooner than 15 days after publication. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 5, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading June 21, 2021 Second reading July 6, 2021 Date of publication July 15, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect Upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than July 30, 2021 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 25 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Planning commission minutes May 19, 2021 Members present: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Courtney Erwin, Jessica Kraft, Tom Weber Members absent: none Staff present: Jacquelyn Kramer, Sean Walther Guests: Jim Vos, Sara Riegle, Asher Michels-Allen, Ryan DuPuis 1. Call to order – roll call 2. Approval of minutes – May 5, 2021 Commissioner Beneke noted he was listed as both absent and present in the minutes. Mr. Walther stated a correction will be made to note his time of arrival to the meeting under the list of people present and delete his name from the absent list. Commissioner Kraft made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Kraft, to approve the minutes as amended. The motion passed unanimously. 3. Hearings 3a. Rise on 7 Applicant: CommonBond Communities Case No: 21-16-CP, 21-17-5, 21-18-PUD Ms. Kramer presented the report. Commissioner Weber asked if on the north side the entrance is off the frontage road vs. Highway 7, and turns could be made right or left. Ms. Kramer stated yes, that is correct. Commissioner Weber asked if the reason there is no access off Division Street is related to increased traffic on the quieter road. Ms. Kramer stated yes, adding the site grading and access to the level of structured parking also contributed to the proposed driveway locations. Commissioner Weber asked how pedestrians would walk to Knollwood and if there is a way to make it safer to walk across Highway 7 at this intersection. Mr. Walther pedestrians should cross at Texas Avenue or Blake Road signaled intersections. He stated there are no plans for additional upgrades at those intersections. There have been improvements at the Blake Road and Texas Avenue intersections in the past few years and the city successfully advocated for preserving the existing pedestrian crossings, while Minnesota Department of Transportation has considered closing some crosswalks. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 26 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Commissioner Weber stated he does have a concern about this intersection, especially if the city wants to be a walkable city. He also wanted to be sure there is a way to get to the bus stop and there are sidewalks available for pedestrians to access. Chair Eckholm agreed adding it is important to have sidewalks to the light rail station for pedestrians. He encouraged the city to add Division Street to the Connect the Park plan as soon as possible so there is access for folks living in this new development and for safety purposes as well. Commissioner Kraft agreed as well and stated it is important these connections are made. She also asked about the daycare and how the shared parking and drive-up lanes would work for pick up and drop off. Ms. Kramer stated several spaces would be signed for daycare pick up and drop off. Commissioner Dagane asked how many units are affordable. Ms. Kramer stated all the units will be affordable to people ranging in income from 30% of the area median income (AMI) up to 70% AMI and there would be a mix of affordability for all the different types of apartment units. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. Caleb Rollins, 4003 Wooddale Avenue, stated his support for the project. He noted two congregations came together to do this project and wanted to make sure this development was affordable and also had the daycare component. He stated the congregation supports this and hoped the commission will do what needs to be done to get the project through. Donna Christiansen, 1422 Division Street, asked about parking on Division Street. The caller noted that Division Street is a snow emergency road. Mr. Walther stated he is not sure who is handling snow removal on Division Street since it is on the border of Hopkins and St. Louis Park. He stated St. Louis Park has exceptions to snow emergencies when there is on-street parking adjacent to multi-family residential uses, and plows pass through later and coordinate with property managers. He added those parking stalls might not be needed. Ms. Christiansen stated current residents do park there. She asked about the daycare and apartment play areas and if they are fenced in to protect children from going onto Division Street. She has concerns about traffic coming in and out of the complex and how the city will handle this. She stated there will be more traffic in that area. She asked what percentages are for the AMI, and she asked if this is section 8 housing, which will impact the neighborhood. Ms. Kramer stated both playground areas are fenced in. Mr. Michels-Allen, the applicant representative, stated currently the breakdown of AMI is 19 units at 30%, 35 units at 40%, 15 units at 50%, 30 units at 60% and 21 units at 70%, however he said that is likely to change a bit. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 27 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Bill Milanko, stated his family has owned the property at 8215 Highway 7 since 1971, noting it is currently occupied by Yardbird Furniture. He stated he is concerned about shadowing, which is more than allowed by city code. He asked for reduction of the height of the building or revisions to the building location. He stated he also has concerns about parking and noted the on-street overflow parking will run 600 feet along the frontage road and is twice the frontage allowed and will overwhelm the area with traffic concerns. He also stated his other concerns are related to visibility of his property, due to increased parking and landscaping. He stated his property relies heavily of highway traffic, noting they already lost 50% of access when Blake Road intersection was redeveloped and now will lose another 50% from landscaping. He asked the commission to please consider this. Barry Wong, 1424 Division Street, stated he has concerns about on-street parking on Division Street along with concerns about traffic and turning left, going northbound. His parking concerns also involve pedestrian safety, and this has not been properly addressed. He stated it is a lot of cars and traffic to add and the conditions of those living there now has not been taken into consideration. William Bigley, 1821 Highway 7, has similar concerns. He is the owner of the building here and is in favor of affordable housing. He noted the eastbound traffic here will be a problem, on Highway 7 and Texas, which is already a clogged intersection. He added pedestrians have no sidewalk on Division that goes to Blake Road. He noted he is in favor of a pedestrian and traffic study here also, which is not being pursued by city staff. He stated this is a good development, but with traffic, access and stacking will make it difficult for his business. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Commissioner Weber stated he does take the callers concerns to heart. He noted the concerns about shadows and trees, and the consideration of where trees are planted should be noted as well as sidewalk placement in the future. He stated the concerns about traffic and cars could be addressed by adding sidewalks to make it a more accessible area and noted the city can encourage less cars parking if sidewalks are added and more pedestrian access created. He encouraged the commission and staff to look further at these issues. Commissioner Kraft stated she had concerns about the shadowing also and has not heard the applicant discuss changing the massing of the building. She stated this is a valid concern from the owner and in the report and should be addressed. Commissioner Beneke agreed with the commissioners and stated the lack of access to Blake Road is also concerning, especially since it is so close to the LRT. He stated this should be addressed with Hopkins as well and could be discussed with council. Chair Eckholm stated he agrees with the recommendations and that there are still some items to iron out. He stated he is supportive of the development and wants to be sure they are a good neighbor. He recommended there be sidewalks added in this area and City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 28 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project that they be included in the Connect the Park program soon. He noted the caller that mentioned landscaping and he asked if the type of landscaping could be reviewed further in order to minimize blocking the visibility of the business here. He encouraged staff to look into this with the applicant. Commissioner Weber made a motion, and Commissioner Kraft seconded, to recommend approval of the comprehensive plan amendment and preliminary and final plat, with conditions recommended by staff. The motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Weber made a motion, and Commissioner Beneke seconded, to table action on the preliminary and final PUD pending hearing back from the applicant on the items noted above. The motion passed unanimously. 4. Other Business - none 5. Communications Mr. Walther noted the June 2 meeting will have a development proposal, a PUD amendment, and an application from a business owner to amend zoning code text, and potentially the item tabled this evening. He thanked Commissioner Erwin for her years on the commission, noting she will be moving away. Commission Erwin complimented staff on their good work and wished everyone well in the future. Mr. Walther congratulated Commissioner Eckholm and Kraft for their reappointments and added two new commissioners were appointed to cover two vacancies. He noted they will join at the June 2 meeting. He stated the commission will begin meeting in person again in July. Adjournment - 7:07 p.m. Sean Walther Matt Eckholm ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Matt Eckholm, chair member City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 29 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Planning commission minutes June 2, 2021 Members present: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Jessica Kraft, Sam Tift, Tom Weber, Joffrey Wilson Members absent: none Staff present: Jennifer Monson, Jacquelyn Kramer, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther, Clint Pires Guests: Dean Newins, Nick Murnane, Tim Callahan, John Kohler, Asher Michels-Allen 1. Call to order – roll call 2. Approval of minutes – May 19, 2021 Commissioner Kraft made a motion, Commissioner Beneke seconded, to accept the May 19, 2021, minutes as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 3. Hearings 3a. Development proposal for 3440 Beltline Blvd. Applicant: Opus Group Case No: 21-19-S, 21-20-PUD Ms. Monson presented the report. Commissioner Beneke asked what the difference is between MX-1 and the PUD. Ms. Monson stated MX-1 would require more commercial on the ground floor along Beltline Boulevard. She added the live-work units do offer the flexibility and opportunity for commercial use along the ground floor. Commissioner Weber asked if the city is viewing this as a marquee development in St. Louis Park. Ms. Monson agreed and stated that this development is in line with the vision for Beltline Boulevard. She added staff met with many prospective developers for this site and shared the city wanted to make sure development meets the city’s goals as outlined in the Beltline Station Area Plan. She stated what is being proposed implements the vision for Beltline Boulevard/Station area, and this development is similar to what was shown in public feedback sessions during the station area planning process. Commissioner Weber asked if the alley, when built, will be the city’s responsibility. Ms. Monson stated that is correct, adding provided it is constructed to city standards and it is in proper condition when it is transferred. The exact location of the alley connection to Park Glen Road will also need to be confirmed, as it would be preferable to connect at a right angle and as far to the west as possible. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 30 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Commissioner Weber asked if the lot lines will be easier to see when the development is finished. Ms. Monson stated yes, the surface parking for the development is further north than the adjacent buildings. Commissioner Weber agreed with the stop light at Park Glen Road and asked about traffic calming in the area also. Ms. Monson stated the city has a project in 2021 to restripe the street from four to three lanes, add on-street bike lanes, and a construct small median at 35th Street and striped pedestrian crosswalk. Commissioner Weber stated with the Bass Lake Preserve across the street, there should be a crosswalk. Ms. Monson agreed. Commissioner Wilson asked, when thinking about the goals of the city and racial equity, is there opportunity for the developer to demonstrate leadership in this area either as a company or on this project specifically by hiring certain underrepresented groups or by other means. Mr. Murnane stated Opus is discussing and thinking about this internally and working on how they can be better at this in all aspects in the development. Mr. Newins added this is part of the core values of Opus and there is an awareness and appreciation of this issue. Mr. Callahan agreed and added Opus is making a conscientious effort to expand and work with additional sub-contractors and create opportunities in this area. Commissioner Kraft asked if the improvements on Beltline will occur prior to the development construction. Ms. Monson stated yes, the improvements will occur this year, including a roundabout at 36th street, restriping, and completing the trail on the west side of Beltline Boulevard. Chair Eckholm noted the parking will be at 304 spaces, which is 20% less. Ms. Monson stated yes, this 20% reduction allows for more flexibility for residential and commercial tenants within the PUD ordinance. Commissioner Tift asked about the planting requirements. He asked if there is a plan related to the alternative planting. Ms. Monson stated typically developments do not meet the city’s planting requirements and this development would require 250 trees and many shrubs. She stated the city typically utilizes public art as an alternative. The process for selecting art is typically a city and developer led process. This includes neighborhood representatives, following city approvals as laid out in a development agreement. She also noted the public art and the public art process are other opportunities to include diversity and inclusion in the project. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. Lee Cannel, 4501 Park Glen Road, asked if this is a marquee development and why can they not go higher than 10% minimum affordable that is required. The caller noted the Bass Lake Preserve is a fragile environment and he has concerns about how the development might affect the preserve. He asked about TIF and if the developer is asking for that and why. He also asked if there will be a traffic light at Park Glen Road City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 31 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project and Beltline Blvd. The caller adding the developer should help pay for the light, especially with so many people living in the area and so much traffic there also. He asked if other developers were interested in affordable housing projects here, such as Common Bond. He stated the developer should meet all the environmental goals of St. Louis Park, adding we need to do better to meet the goals of the city. Chair Eckholm stated this is a private development and the city did not seek out this developer. He added the city is the steward and does not typically seek out other developers; the city looks to see if the development meets the goals of the city. He agreed he would like to see a higher percentage of affordable units as well. Mr. Walther stated TIF is anticipated due to extraordinary development costs and a financial gap in the feasibility of the project. In addition, because of the PUD, this development will be required to meet the city’s green building policy and inclusionary housing policy. He added this development meets these requirements. He also added this development is not being asked to provide a signal at Park Glen Road. He stated the signal is not yet warranted there. The city does plan to have one there in the future and the timing will be triggered when there is a demonstrated need and higher volumes are seen on the side streets. He added the city will look to fund and advance that in the future and likely timed with the development of 4600 Beltline Blvd. Mr. Walther added the city is looking to protect Bass Lake and will provide stormwater treatment which will be far better than what is currently there. He stated there will be vast improvements to the water quality and reduction in the rate stormwater is released from this site into Bass Lake with this development. Ms. Monson agreed with Commissioner Weber’s comments that this is a private development and that affordable housing is also important in the city. She added the housing policy for the city does encompass various tiers for affordability at the light rail stations. Commissioner Weber added the requirements of the city on housing affordability are determined by the city council. The planning commission works on projects that include affordability, including an application for another site in the city later in the agenda. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kraft stated this is a thorough project with much research and thought. She appreciates the live-work spaces and retail/commercial at either end and she sees this changing more as light rail moves in. She stated she is supportive and thinks it is very well done. Commissioner Beneke thanked staff and the developer on this and appreciated how the city is considering more affordability also. He stated he will support this as well. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 32 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Chair Eckholm stated this development represents a great step for the area and this will set the standard for the Beltline Blvd area and future developments in the area. He stated he also will support this project. Commissioner Weber made a motion and Commissioner Dagane seconded to recommend approval of the development proposal for 3440 Beltline Boulevard as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. Parkway Residences planned unit development major amendment Applicant: Sela Investments, Ltd. Case No: 21-22-PUD Ms. Monson presented the report. Commissioner Beneke stated the biggest change here is the reduced number of shrubs. Ms. Monson stated the shrubs are reduced but they are adding trees and a sidewalk to increase the connections. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. There were no callers. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Commissioner Kraft made a motion and Commissioner Beneke seconded to approve the major amendment to the PUD at Parkway Residences as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 3c. Zoning ordinance amendment pertaining to the animal handling land category Applicant: John Kohler, representing Paster Properties Case No: 21-23-ZA Mr. Morrison presented the report. Commissioner Kraft asked if any complaints have come forward in the past regarding these kinds of businesses. Mr. Morrison stated there have been no complaints of odor or nuisance in the past. Commissioner Wilson noted if this were approved this would set precedent in various developments. He noted it would introduce the use in vertical mixed-use buildings where they haven’t been allowed before, so there may be a potential for nuisance complaints where none were previously permitted. Mr. Morrison stated that is correct and noted conditions were added related to size to further reduce the potential impacts on neighbors. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 33 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Commissioner Beneke asked how this works with a PUD and what is allowed. Mr. Morrison stated several PUDs are already approved and this ordinance would add this use to some of the existing PUDs and going forward in future PUDs staff would consider including this use along with other commercial/residential uses when drafting the PUD. Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing. Mr. Kohler stated there is a tenant that would like to be in the Texa-Tonka shopping center building and they would be very quiet within the development. There were no callers. Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing. Chair Eckholm stated there seems to be no harm with this ordinance and he appreciated staff working with the applicant to meet their needs but also write this to not allow for something that the city would not want. He stated he would support this. Commissioner Weber stated he also would support the ordinance. Commissioner Weber made a motion and Commissioner Wilson seconded, to approve the zoning ordinance amendment pertaining to the animal handling land category as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Other Business a. Rise on 7 – preliminary and final planned unit development Ms. Kramer presented the report. Commissioner Wilson noted concerns from residents and businesses and asked about shadowing which has been addressed within this new plan. He asked about traffic concerns. Ms. Kramer stated staff conducted a preliminary review of traffic. She added a full study was not conducted as the project will not generate a level of traffic that would trigger the need for a traffic study. She noted traffic concerns were about potential delays of eastbound traffic on the frontage road waiting to turn left onto Texas Ave. She noted that staff’s assessment is that this does not warrant any mitigation. Commissioner Wilson asked about affordability in this project. Ms. Kramer stated all of the units will be affordable to a variety of incomes ranging from 30% to 70% AMI. She added this project exceeds the requirements of the city’s inclusionary housing policy. Commissioner Beneke asked if there is a way to shorten the path from the development to the light rail station. Ms. Kramer stated the main pedestrian paths will be along the frontage road or taking Texas Avenue to Lake Street to Blake Road. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 34 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Commissioner Weber acknowledged that part of Division Street is in Hopkins, however, he stated he is so grateful to the developer and city staff for adding sidewalks for connectivity. He added the frontage road will get pedestrians to Blake Road and to the light rail. He further encouraged the city and developer to find a way to fund additional sidewalks there to close the remaining gaps. Mr. Walther stated the city’s Connect the Park initiative does work to address this and it has been well-funded. He added more projects including bridges will be coming this year in the city. He noted in the past there have been funds for random sidewalk repairs and adding projects like this. Those funds are spoken for in the capital improvements plan and the council is working to balance funding on the Connect the Park program with other priorities. Mr. Walther stated because of this, there is no funding available now. Staff will work to find a funding source, but it cannot be guaranteed. Commissioner Weber appreciated the changes made at the development and stated he will support it adding the traffic issues will be limited as there is no through traffic on these streets. Commissioner Wilson stated he appreciates this project and he thanked staff for the presentation. Commissioner Tift stated he is supportive of the affordable nature of this project and asked if the daycare will be affordable as well. Ms. Kramer stated this is a priority of Common Bond, the day care provider, the church that is selling the property, and it is a crucial component of the project. Mr. Michels-Allen added the general understanding with the daycare is that half the spots will be affordable rates. Chair Eckholm stated he supports the project as well, adding he likes the changes made to the building. He again asked staff to please find funding for the sidewalks to help pedestrians connect in the area, in a safe manner. Commissioner Beneke made a motion and Commissioner Kraft seconded, to recommend approval of the preliminary and final PUD subject to conditions recommended by staff. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Communications a. Appointment/introductions of new commissioners Commissioner Wilson noted he is from Minneapolis and has lived in St. Louis Park for over 11 years, is married with two children. He stated he is excited to be on the planning commission and works for Mortenson in human resources working in diversity and inclusion. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Page 35 Title: Rise on 7 redevelopment project Commissioner Tift stated he is from St. Louis Park, left and moved back. He is in the process of buying a home and works at Horizontal Digital. His background is in marketing and management and is looking forward to working with everyone. Commissioner Weber stated he and Commissioner Dagane started a year ago. He added the majority of the commission has never met in person, due to only attending online meetings. Mr. Walther noted the next meeting will be in two weeks, with discussions on a home occupations ordinance for consideration and a public hearing. That meeting will be followed by a study session introducing a new development proposal by Sherman Associates at the future Beltline Boulevard LRT station and commissioners will debrief about the meeting with city council on the 2021 work plan. Mr. Walther also stated that because of the changing guidance of the Center for Disease Control and Minnesota Department of Health, city council has asked all commissions to return to in-person meetings in July. He stated the first meeting in July will be cancelled and the second meeting in July will be the first in person meeting in over a year. He added he will send an email with guidance to the commission. 6. Adjournment – 8:11 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Sean Walther, liaison Matt Eckholm, chair member St. Louis Park Community Development Department • 5005 Minnetonka Blvd., St. Louis Park, MN 55416 www.stlouispark.org • Phone: 952.924.2575 • Fax: 952.928.2662 • TTY: 952.924.2518 Rise on 7 neighborhood meeting – April 8, 2021, 6:30 pm About 35 people attended the Zoom meeting. This number includes the development team, representatives from the city (Jacquelyn Kramer and Sean Walther), local housing advocates with ISAIAH and St. Louis Park Community Housing Team, and Councilmembers Lynette Dumalag and Rachel Harris. Asher Michels-Allen with CommonBond and Ryan Dupris with Kaas Wilson Architects gave an overview of the development team and their proposal for the site. •CommonBond is a values-center, non-profit developer. They own and operate their buildings and their financing guarantees affordability for at least 40 years. CommonBond also provide supportive services to the residents of their buildings based on site needs, including educational and after school programs, employment training, housing stability, and social services support. •Rise on 7 is a 120-unit, 4 story mixed-use building on the site of the former Prince of Peace church. The project is 100% affordable with an income range of 30-80% area median income (AMI). The development team also proposes a 6,000 square foot daycare for the site, to be operated in partnership with Westwood Lutheran Church. The daycare will provide childcare at affordable rates and some of the spaces will be reserved for families living at Rise on 7. •Staff anticipate applications on April 19. Planning commission is tentatively scheduled to hold a public hearing May 19, and council is tentatively scheduled to take action on the applications in June. •If the project is approved, construction would start fall 2021, and the building would open Feb- March 2023. Discussion •Questions regarding the affordability of the units and how long they would remain affordable. CommonBond owns and operates their properties long-term, so while the terms of their financial commitments guarantee forty years, they plan to keep Rise on 7 affordable in perpetuity. •A question regarding stormwater. The project includes underground stormwater treatment and storage. •Councilmember Harris asked if the development would give priority to St. Louis Park residents. CommonBond typically does not give priority based on location. Their properties typically rent to people already in the neighborhood, so they expect Rise on 7 will rent to people in St. Louis Park and Hopkins. •Questions regarding parking on the site and on-street parking along Division. Ryan Dupris explained the surface and structured parking proposed for the site. Jacquelyn Kramer explained that on-street parking is allowed on Division Street adjacent to the property. One resident was concerned about guest/visitors parking on the street; another resident stated they were not concerned given the proximity of transit and the off-street parking on the site. •CommonBond staff explained the various support services they offer their residents. •Meeting attendees discussed ways people and nonprofits in the community could partner with the project and support the residents. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 36 4003 Wooddale Ave St. Louis Park, MN 55416 | 952 -926 -7603 | vistalutheran.org St. Louis Park City Council June 16, 2021 5005 Minnetonka Blvd St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Dear Council Members, The people of Vista Lutheran want to voice our whole-hearted support for the proposed Rise on 7 project, being developed by CommonBond Communities. When the members of Prince of Peace Lutheran and Wooddale Lutheran combined to form Vista Lutheran, we had a choice to make about the amount of property we held. The people decided to sell the former Prince of Peace property. It was a piece of real estate with a high value based on its location near a major commercial space and the incoming Southwest LRT. However, the congregation didn’t just look to maximize profit. We wanted to maximize our impact on the life of the community. When the opportunity came to sell the property to CommonBond Communities, a non-profit equitable housing developer; the congregation found a way to love and serve the people of St. Louis Park for decades to come. The Rise on 7 development will provide affordable housing for individuals and families and will include a childcare center for underserved families (many of whom may reside in the building). This project is a force for good in our community. We all want to have a community where everyone has the chance to live and thrive. As the people of Vista Lutheran, we see it as a basic part of our faith to care for and serve the people around us with love and compassion. This project will do that for so many people. The people of Vista Lutheran not only support this project, we celebrate it! With gratitude, Debbie Olson Congregational Council President Rev. Heidi Zimdars Senior Pastor Rev. Dan Nelson Associate Pastor City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 37 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Tim, I live at 1346 Westwood Hills Road. I was unable to attend the meeting that included CommonBond last evening. I have known of and worked with individuals from the organization as long as 25 years ago. I know them to be a conscientious, thorough organization. Given our shortage of affordable housing in SLP I support this project and hope the Council goes forward with CommonBond as the organizer. Thank You, One of your election judges...Kathy McKay On Apr 9, 2021, at 12:09 PM, Kathy <mlopez5935@aol.com> wrote: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 38 1 Jacquelyn Kramer From:William Bailey <wt_bailey@msn.com> Sent:Thursday, May 13, 2021 3:50 AM To:Jacquelyn Kramer Cc:Gary Morrison Subject:Rise on 7 Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Jacquelyn, Thank you for taking my call yesterday. As the owner of the retail strip center at 8225 W Hwy 7, I am concerned about the impact the rezoning and residential development will have on the ease of access and egress to my building at 8225 W Hwy 7. It is my understanding that all residential traffic for the development will enter and depart onto the frontage road (the Church had an additional access point on Division St.). More specifically, the frontage road has one-way in and out - at Texas Ave. That is a funny intersection - really two intersections. Departing the frontage road there is one access point to get onto Texas Avenue and very quickly another to get onto Hwy 7. While I am not a traffic engineer, I am concerned about the traffic that will likely back up at the frontage road and Texas Ave. Drivers wishing to turn left (north) onto Texas and then right onto Hwy 7 already are forced to make that change quickly and cross over two separate lanes of traffic in a very short distance before they wait and then merge onto Hwy 7. I will note that this is a very different access point onto Texas Avenue from the other side of Hwy 7 (where traffic departing Knollwood Mall have a "right" turn out of the mall onto Texas Ave). Further, that Mall traffic has more distance to join the left turn lane to access Hwy 7 eastbound. On our side of Hwy 7, there simply isn't enough room for that lane shift. I'm concerned that the increased traffic from the zoning change to high-density residential, will stress that access point. It is my understanding that a traffic study isn't currently available. I would hope that a traffic study could confirm or dismiss my concern. Respectfully submitted. Bill Bailey William (Bill) Bailey Chief Manager Namakan Properties, LLC P.O. Box 451, Excelsior, MN 55331 612 889-2731 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 39 St Louis Park Planning Commission May 13, 2021 5005 Minnetonka Blvd St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Re: rise-on-7 Development My name is William Meleyco, my family built and has owned the property next door to this proposed development since 1971. I am very concerned about the effects that this new development will have on our property. None of which are to the better. Please consider the following in your decision making for this Proposed development. 1. Shadows - As shown by the Shadow Study the Proposed will cast a shadow over our building ALL YEAR long until 11:00 am EVERY DAY. I suggest cutting the height of the Proposed or moving this project further from the property line such that these shadows will not impact us. 2. Visibility - Our property is a commercial building as thus relies heavily on visibility from the Highway. The Proposed landscaping plan will virtually block the sight lines from traffic traveling west along the highway. The Proposed landscaping not only has two rows of large trees situated along the frontage at our side of their property but also has additional trees located on the property line between us. This creates three rows of trees between us and the sight lines. The retail business is tough enough but with the loss of visibility we will definitely loose customers. I suggest removing or replacing this landscaping such that it will not block our visibility from the highway. 3. Access/Traffic - The frontage road we are located on has suffered from a lack of access since the redesign of the Blake Road and Highway 7 intersection. That redesign stopped access onto the frontage road from Blake. We lost fifty percent (50%) of our access leaving us only access from Texas Avenue. It resulted in the loss of sales as well as the loss of City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 40 value to our property. The Proposed will further hinder accessibility as it will further burden the frontage road. It is greatly under parked which will result in overflowing the street with parked cars. Additionally the Church currently has access onto Division Street. The Proposed does not. If the Proposed provided access to this street it would greatly reduce the congestion along the frontage road as well as reduce the burden at the intersection of the Frontage Road and Texas Ave. I suggest increasing the onsite parking requirement as well as have the Proposed provide direct access onto Division Street. 4. Ugly/ Out of Place - The Proposed is ugly. It is not in keeping with the neighborhood. It looks institutional and is yet another example of a Cookie Cutter Development from a Developer who has used this design in another location who is plopping it yet onto another site. It does not fit the location. This is a Retail Street not a Residential one. The size of this project will further isolate us at the end of this now dead end street. I suggest reducing the size of the Proposed such that it does not over whelm and burden the other developments on the street. Please consider our issues in your decision. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 41 4003 Wooddale Ave St. Louis Park, MN 55416 | 952 -926 -7603 | vistalutheran.org St. Louis Park Planning Commission 5005 Minnetonka Blvd St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Dear Members of the St. Louis Park Planning Commission, The people of Vista Lutheran want to voice our whole-hearted support for the proposed Rise on 7 project, being developed by CommonBond Communities. When the members of Prince of Peace Lutheran and Wooddale Lutheran combined to form Vista Lutheran, we had a choice to make about the amount of property we held. The people decided to sell the former Prince of Peace property. It was a piece of real estate with a high value based on its location near a major commercial space and the incoming Southwest LRT. However, the congregation didn’t just look to maximize profit. We wanted to maximize our impact on the life of the community. When the opportunity came to sell the property to CommonBond Communities, a non-profit equitable housing developer; the congregation found a way to love and serve the people of St. Louis Park for decades to come. The Rise on 7 development will provide affordable housing for individuals and families and will include a childcare center for underserved families (many of whom may reside in the building). This project is a force for good in our community. We all want to have a community where everyone has the chance to live and thrive. As the people of Vista Lutheran, we see it as a basic part of our faith to care for and serve the people around us with love and compassion. This project will do that for so many people. The people of Vista Lutheran not only support this project, we celebrate it! With gratitude, Debbie Olson Congregational Council President Rev. Heidi Zimdars Senior Pastor Rev. Dan Nelson Associate Pastor City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 42 APARTMENT SITE SITE LOCATION: Map provided by Google Earth. PROJECT TEAM ARCHITECT: Contact: Ryan DuPuis Kaas Wilson Architects 1301 American Blvd. E., Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 P: 612.879.6000 INTERIORS: Contact: Ryan DuPuis Kaas Wilson Architects CIVIL/LANDSCAPE: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 P: 763.469.6736 ELECTRICAL David Thomas Cain Thomas Associates, Inc. 4215 White Bear Parkway Suite 100, Saint Paul, MN 55110 651-426-9549 GENERAL CONTRACTOR - STRUCTURAL: Sandman Engineers 1587 30th Ave. S. Moorhead, MN 56560 P: 218.227.0022 MECHANICAL/ PLUMBING: Ryan D. Stephans Cain Thomas Associates Inc. 4215 White Bear Parkway Suite 100, Saint Paul, MN 55110 P: 651-426-9549 A D D AC AIR CONDITIONER ACMV APPLIED CONC. MASONRY VENEER ACOUST ACOUSTIC/ACOUSTICAL ACT ACOUSTIC TILE ADH ADHESIVE AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AGGR AGGREGATE ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM AP ACCESS PANEL ARCH ARCHITECTURAL ASPH ASPHALT AVE AVENUE BD/BDS BOARD/BOARDS BFE BOTTOM OF FOOTING BITUM BITUMINOUS BKT BRACKET BLDG BUILDING BLK BLOCK BLKG BLOCKING BLVD BOULEVARD BM BEAM/BENCH MARK BOT BOTTOM BR BEDROOM BRG BEARING BRK BRICK BSMT BASEMENT BTWN BETWEEN CAB CABINET CB CATCH BASIN CEM CEMENT CFB CEMENT FIBER BOARD CG CORNER GUARD CIP CAST IRON PIPE CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTER LINE CLG CEILING CLKG CAULKING CLO CLOSET CMU CONC MASONRY UNIT CNTR COUNTER CO COMPANY COL COLUMN COMB COMBINATION COMP COMPOSITION CONC CONCRETE CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CONTR CONTRACTOR CORP CORPORATION CORR CORRIDOR CPT CARPET CR CURTAIN ROD CSK COUNTERSINK CT CERAMIC TILE CTOP COUNTER TOP CU FT CUBIC FOOT CU IN CUBIC INCH CU YD CUBIC YARD D DRYER DBL DOUBLE DEPT DEPARTMENT DET DETAIL DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN DIA DIAMETER DIAG DIAGONAL DIM DIMENSION DIV DIVISION DN DOWN DPRF DAMPPROOF DR DINING ROOM/DOOR DS DOWNSPOUT DT DRAPERY TRACK DW DISHWASHER DWG DRAWING DWR DRAWER E EAST EA EACH EIFS EXT. INSUL FIN SYSTEM EL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRIC/ELECTRICAL ELEV ELEVATOR ENGR ENGINEER ENT ENTRANCE EQ EQUAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT EST ESTIMATE EW EACH WAY EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EX EXISTING EXC EXCAVATE EXH EXHAUST EXP JT EXPANSION JOINT EXT EXTERIOR F TO F FACE TO FACE FAB FABRICATE FD FLOOR DRAIN FDN FOUNDATION FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FEP FINISHED END PANEL FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FF FINISH FACE FH FIRE HOSE FIG FIGURE FIN FINISH/ FINISHED FIX FIXTURE FL FLOOR FLASH FLASHING FLUOR FLUORESCENT FM FACE OF MASONRY FOW FACE OF WALL FPRF FIREPROOF FR FRAME FRT FREIGHT FS FACE STUD FSH FACE OF SHEATHING FT FOOT/FEET FTG FOOTING FURN FURNISH FURR FURRING F.V.FIELD VERIFIED G GAS GA GAUGE GAL GALLON GALV GALVANIZED GAR GARAGE GB GRAB BAR GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GEN GENERAL GI GALVANIZED IRON GL GLASS/GLAZING GOVT GOVERNMENT GPBD GYPSUM WALLBOARD GPM GALLON PER MINUTE GR GRADE GRTG GRATING GS GREASE SHIELD GYP GYPSUM HB HOSE BIB HC HOLLOW CORE HD HEAD HDRL HANDRAIL HDWD HARDWOOD HDW HARDWARE HM HOLLOW METAL HORIZ HORIZONTAL HR HOUR HT HEIGHT HWY HIGHWAY ID IDENTIFICATION/INSIDE DIA IN INCH INCL INCLUDE INC INCORPORATE INFO INFORMATION INSUL INSULATE/INSULATION INT INTERIOR INV INVERT JAN JANITOR JCT JUNCTION JT JOINT JST JOIST KD KNOCK DOWN KIT/K KITCHEN L LINEN LAB LABORATORY LAD LADDER LAM LAMINATE LAT LATITUDE LAV LAVATORY LB/LBS POUND/POUNDS LBR LUMBER LD LOAD LDG LOADING LG LENGTH LH LEFT HAND LIB LIBRARY LIN LINOLEUM LNDY LAUNDRY LOA LENGTH OVERALL LONG LONGITUDE LR LIVING ROOM LT LIGHT MACH MACHINE MAS MASONRY MATL MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MC MEDICINE CABINET MECH MECHANICAL MEMB MEMBRANE MEMO MEMORANDUM MEZZ MEZZANINE MFG MANUFACTURED MFR MANUFACTURER MH MANHOLE MIN MINIMUM MIR MIRROR MISC MISCELLANEOUS MLDG MOULDING MO MASONRY OPENING MOD MODULAR MTL METAL MTD MOUNTED MULL MULLION N NORTH NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NO/#NUMBER NOM NOMINAL NTS NOT TO SCALE OA OVERALL OC ON CENTER OD OVERFLOW DRAIN OFF OFFICE OPNG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE ORIG ORIGINAL OSB ORIENTED STRAND BOARD OZ OUNCE P&G PITCH & GRAVEL PASS PASSENGER PCF POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT PED PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC COATING PER PERIMETER PERF PERFORATE PERP PERPENDICULAR PIL PILASTER P LAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PL PLATE PLAS PLASTER PLMB PLUMBING PLYWD PLYWOOD PNEU PNEUMATIC POL POLISHED PORC PORCELAIN PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PT PAINT/POINT PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER PTN PARTITION PREFAB PREFABRICATED PREFIN PREFINISHED PROP PROPERTY PUR PURLINS QR QUARTER/QUARTER-ROUND QT QUARRY TILE QTY QUANTITY R RISER R&S ROD & SHELF RAD RADIATION/RADIUS RB RESILIENT BASE RC RESILIENT CHANNEL RCT RUBBER COMPOSITION TILE RD ROAD/ROUND/ROOF DRAIN RECP RECEPTACLE REC RECESSED ABBREVIATIONS (These patterns are scaled for 1-1/2"= 1'-0"details) FOAM/POURED IN PLACE INSUL EARTH CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT STEEL RIGID INSULATION OR BRICK/ MANUFACTURED STONE CONCRETE SAND GRANULAR FILL GYPSUM BOARD ROUGH WOOD QUARRY OR CERAMIC TILE WOOD STUD WALL WOOD BLOCKING OR SHIM BATT INSULATION (INSUL-10) PLYWOOD 1 1 AXXX 1 DOOR NUMBER ROOM NAME / NUMBER INTERIOR/EXTERIOR WALL TYPE, FLOOR-CEILING TYPE REVISION CLOUD DETAIL CALLOUT BREAK LINE HDCP SYMBOL ELEVATION / WORK POINT NORTH ARROW KEYNOTES ADDENDUM, CHANGE ORDER, PROPOSAL REQUEST, ARCHITECTS SUPPLEMENTAL INSTRUCTIONS INTERIOR ELEVATION DETAIL SECTION ELEVATION A X X AXXX X AXXX AXXX A B C D ? ? ? X AXXX NC D B UNIT NUMBER / NAME DETAIL NUMBER? ?? ? SYMBOLS KEY ? ? ? CASEWORK TAG PARKING TAG WINDOW TAG HATCH KEY REF REFERENCE REFRIG REFRIGERATOR REG REGULAR/REGISTER REINF REINFORCE/REINFORCING REQD REQUIRED RESIL RESILIENT RET RETURN RH ROBE HOOK/RIGHT HAND RFG ROOFING RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING RS REDUCER STRIP RWD REDWOOD RWL RAIN WATER LEADER S SOUTH SAN SANITARY SB SPLASH BLOCK SC SOLID CORE SCHED SCHEDULE SD SOAP DISH S DISP SOAP DISPENSER SEC SECOND SECT SECTION SH SHELF/SHINGLES SHR SHOWER SHT SHEET SHTG SHEATHING SID SIDING SIM SIMILAR SLID SLIDING SM SMOOTH (FINISH) SND SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER SNR SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTACLE SPEC SPECIFICATION SQ SQUARE SS SERVICE SINK SSA SINGLE STRENGTH A S STL STAINLESS STEEL ST STREET STD STANDARD STL STEEL STOR STORAGE STR STRINGER STXT SPRAY TEXTURE SUB FL SUBFLOOR SUSP SUSPENDED SV SHEET VINYL S4S SURFACED FOUR SIDES T TREAD T&G TONGUE & GROOVE TB TOWEL BAR TC TOP OF CURB TECH TECHNICAL TEL TELEPHONE TEMP TEMPERED TERR TERRAZZO TEX TEXTURE TFE TOP OF FOOTING ELEV THRESH THRESHOLD THRU THROUGH TK BD TACKBOARD T.O TOP OF . . . TPH TOILET PAPER HOLDER TRANS TRANSOM TV TELEVISION TW TOP OF WALL TYP TYPICAL UL UNDERWRITER'S LAB, INC UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE VAN VANITY VB VAPOR BARRIER/VINYL BASE VEN VENEER VENT VENTILATOR VERT VERTICAL VEST VESTIBULE VFY VERIFY VIN VINYL VNL VINYL VWC VINYL WALL COVERING VCP VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE VCT VINYL COMP TILE W WEST/WASHER W/WITH W/O WITHOUT WC WATER CLOSET WD WOOD WDW WINDOW WI WROUGHT IRON WP WATERPROOF WR WATER RESISTAN WS WEATHERSTRIP WSCT WAINSCOTING WT WEIGHT WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC YD YARD NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:45:42 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtCover Sheet 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA000 Rise on 7 8115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 554268115 MN-7 St Louis Park, MN 55426 MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Residential Unit Mix Name Count Gross Area Net Area Unit 1-1 34 708 ft²647 ft² Unit 1-2 13 690 ft² Unit 1-3 8 703 ft²641 ft² Unit 1-5 Type A 2 690 ft² 57 Unit 2-1 25 958 ft²885 ft² Unit 2-2 4 939 ft² Unit 2-3 Type A 2 958 ft² Unit 2-4 8 958 ft² 39 Unit 3-1 14 1,292 ft² 1,205 ft² Unit 3-2 4 1,248 ft² 1,162 ft² Unit 3-3 4 1,249 ft² 1,163 ft² Unit 3-4 Type A 2 1,297 ft² 1,285 ft² 24 Grand total: 120 120 Total Gross Area Level Area Level 4 32,993 ft² Level 3 32,993 ft² Level 2 32,993 ft² Level 1 32,994 ft² Level P 35,310 ft² Grand total 167,282 ft² Parking Schedule Type Count Garage 74 Site 95 169 Rev. No.RevisionDateDrawing Index Sheet Number Sheet Name Original Issue Date Current Revision Date Drawing Index Sheet Number Sheet Name Original Issue Date Current Revision Date Drawing Index Sheet Number Sheet Name Original Issue Date Current Revision Date A000 Cover Sheet A010 Const Assemblies - Int Walls & Horiz A011 Const Assemblies - Ext Walls A101 Code Plans A102 Code Plans A103 Code Plans A100 Code Review A110 Code Diagrams A120 Site A300 Level P West Plan A301 Level P East Plan A310 Level 1 West Plan A311 Level 1 East Plan A320 Level 2 West Plan A321 Level 2 East Plan A330 Level 3 West Plan A331 Level 3 East Plan A340 Level 4 West Plan A341 Level 4 East Plan A350 Roof Plan West A351 Roof Plan East A450 Unit Details A451 Unit 1-1 and 1-2 A452 Unit 1-3 and 1-5 Type A A453 Unit 2-1 A454 Unit 2-2 A455 Unit 2-3 Type A A456 Unit 3-1 A457 Unit 3-2 A458 Unit 3-3 A459 Unit 3-4 Type A A500 Exterior Elevations A501 Exterior Elevations A502 Exterior Elevations A600 Building Sections A610 Wall Sections A611 Wall Sections A620 Vertical Circulation - Stair A A621 Vertical Circulation - Stair B A622 Vertical Circulation - Elevator 05/19/21 A623 Vertical Circulation Details A801 Exterior Details - Foundations A802 Exterior Details - Cladding A820 Openings A821 Exterior Details - Openings A840 Roof Framing & Flashing 12/18/20 A860 Interior Framing & Firestopping A861 Air Sealing Details A880 Penetration Details A881 Penetration Details A882 Penetration Details I100 Room Finish Schedule 06/02/21 I300 Interior Coord. Plans 06/02/21 I301 Interior Coord. Plans 06/02/21 I400 Floor & Wall Finish Plans 06/02/21 General Notes to Bidders: 1. The Architect and Engineers will answer no questions directly from sub-contractors during bid period.All questions and requests for clarifications shall be submitted in writing by each invited general contractor and will be answered back by the Architect or Engineers in writing. Sub-contractors shall route any inquiries through the General Contractor requesting their bid. 2.Per AIA A201: CORRELATION AND INTENT OF THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS §1.2.1 The intent of the Contract Documents is to include all items necessary for the proper execution and completion of the Work by the Contractor. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is required by one shall be as binding as if required by all; performance by the Contractor shall be required only to the extent consistent with the Contract Documents and reasonably inferable from them as being necessary to produce the indicated results. §1.2.2 Organization of the Specifications into divisions, sections and articles, and arrangement of Drawings shall not control the Contractor in dividing the Work among Subcontractors or in establishing the extent of Work to be performed by any trade. Per Supplementary instructions Specification Section 00 81 00 A.1.2.4 -Precedence: In the event of inconsistencies among the documents, Architect will interpret them in accordance with the requirements specified herein and the overall intent of achieving a finished,code complying product throughout the buildings. B.1.2.5 -Where standard specifications, such as Fed. Spec, ANSI, ASTM, or other standards are referred to herein, if no date or edition is indicated, the latest or most recent edition at date of issue including all supplements, shall apply to this project. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 43 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development projectPage 44 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development projectPage 45 City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development projectPage 46 REMOVE CONCRETE APRON REMOVE BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT TYP. REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALKS TYP. REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE LIGHT POLES AND ELECTRICAL TYP. REMOVE TIRE STOPS AND HC SIGNAGE TYP. REMOVE GARAGE REMOVE BUILDING UTILTIES REMOVE PLAYGROUND MATERIALS AND FENCE REMOVE SIGN REMOVE SIGN REMOVE TRASH ENCLOSURE REMOVE ENTRY STEPS PILLARS, SIGNAGE, AND CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE APRON AND CURBING REMOVE CONCRETE APRON AND CURBING PROTECT EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER TYP. REMOVE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER. CAP AND ABANDON AT PROPERTY LINE REMOVE PRIVATE SIGNAGE TYP. REMOVE BRICK PILLAR PROTECT OVERHEAD POWER TYP. REMOVE WALL AND STEPS TYP. REMOVE WINDOW WELLS TYP. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE/ABANDON/CAP ALL BUILDING SERVICES. REMOVALS TO MEET ALL APPLICABLE CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. REMOVE, CUT & CAP EXISTING WATER SERVICE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. COORDINATE W/ CITY ON REMOVAL REQUIREMENTS & TIMING REMOVE FIBER OPTIC PROTECT OVERHEAD POWER TYP. SAWCUT/ & REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE CURB/GUTTER REMOVE CURB/GUTTER SAWCUT/ & REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SAWCUT/ & REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT PROTECT TREES (SEE SWPPP) REMOVE CONCRETE APRON REMOVE BITUMINOUS PARKING LOT TYP. REMOVE CONCRETE SIDEWALKS TYP. REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE LIGHT POLESAND ELECTRICAL TYP. REMOVE TIRE STOPSAND HC SIGNAGE TYP. REMOVE GARAGE REMOVE BUILDINGUTILTIES REMOVE PLAYGROUNDMATERIALS ANDFENCE REMOVE SIGN REMOVE SIGN REMOVETRASHENCLOSURE REMOVE ENTRY STEPSPILLARS, SIGNAGE,AND CONCRETE REMOVE CONCRETE APRONAND CURBING REMOVE CONCRETE APRONAND CURBING PROTECT EXISTINGOVERHEAD POWER TYP. REMOVE PRIVATESANITARY SEWER.CAP AND ABANDONAT PROPERTY LINE REMOVE PRIVATE SIGNAGE TYP. REMOVE BRICKPILLAR PROTECTOVERHEADPOWER TYP. REMOVE WALLAND STEPS TYP. REMOVE WINDOWWELLS TYP. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE/ABANDON/CAP ALLBUILDING SERVICES. REMOVALS TO MEET ALLAPPLICABLE CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. REMOVE, CUT & CAPEXISTING WATERSERVICE AT THEPROPERTY LINE.COORDINATE W/CITY ON REMOVALREQUIREMENTS &TIMING REMOVE FIBER OPTIC PROTECTOVERHEADPOWER TYP. SAWCUT/ & REMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENT REMOVE CURB/GUTTER REMOVE CURB/GUTTER SAWCUT/ & REMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENT SAWCUT/ & REMOVEBITUMINOUSPAVEMENT PROTECT TREES(SEE SWPPP) LOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C1-1 DEMO PLANPlotted: 06 /03 / 2021 4:44 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL PJD 06/03/21 - 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 DEMOLITION PLAN C1-1 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, RETAINING WALLS, FENCE, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING CONCRETE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING DEMOLITION LEGEND: 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. 3.CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON-SITE. REFER TO GRADING PLAN AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4.CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. SEE THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SITE DEMOLITION NOTES NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS REPRESENTED BY A SURVEY PREPARED BY EGAN, FIELD, & NOWAK, INC. REMOVE EXISTING TREES SURVEY LEGEND: TREE PRESERVAITON/MITIGATION INFO: TREE CALIPER INCHES TO MITIGATE: 207 INCHES REMOVE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING TREE INFO: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 47 FIRST FLOOR - 930.33 GARAGE - 919.00 DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA APARTMENT PLAY AREA CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE APRON (SEE DETAIL) CONCRETE SIDEWALK (SEE DETAIL) 5.0' 24.0' 17.0' 5.0' 5.0' 8.0' 8.0' 8.0' 8.0' 8.0' 8.0' 8.0' 24.0' 36.0' 24.0' 18.0' 18.0' 18.0'24.0' 5.0' 9.0' 9.0' 9.0' 24.0' 24.0' 18.0' 18.0' R10.0' R10.0' R3.0' R3.0' R3.0' R7.0' R30.0' R10.0' R10.0' R3.0' R7.0' R3.0' R7.0' R3.0' R3.0' R3.0' R3.0' R3.0' R3.0' R55.0' R3.0' CONCRETE BLOCK RETAINING WALL W/ PROTECTIVE FENCE 22 5 16 14 15 8 4 3 LOOP BIKE RACKS (FOR 6 BIKES 3 LOOP BIKE RACKS (FOR 6 BIKES GARAGE EXIT 9.0' HC SIGN (SEE DETAIL) CURB TAPER HC SIGNAGE (SEE DETAIL) CURB TAPER CURB TAPER FLAT CURB HC SIGN TYP. (SEE DETAIL) FLAT CURB (SEE DETAIL) CURB TAPER CURB TAPER SEE ARCH PLANS FOR OUTDOOR PLAY AREA INFO 4' GATE HC RAMP W/ 3' CURB TAPERS 6' CURB TAPER 10' CURB TAPER FLAT CURB B612 CURB GUTTER TYP. 5.0' 10' CURB TAPER 3' CURB TAPER 3' CURB TAPER 3' CURB TAPER 3' CURB TAPER3' CURB TAPER HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE (SEE DETAIL) 30.0' 15.0' 15.0' 30.0' 15.0' 15.0' 30.0' 15.0' PROPOSED BUILDING PROPOSED BENCH SEATING AREA FOR DAYCARE 3 LOOP BIKE RACKS (FOR 6 BIKES OUTDOOR PATIO AND SEATING AREA OUTDOOR GREEN/PLAY SPACE OUTDOOR GREEN/PLAY SPACE CONCRETE PLAY EDGE 42" BLACK ORNAMENTAL FENCE W/ 4' GATE 5.0' 6' CURB TAPER 11 NO VEHICULAR ACCESS TO SITE FOR VEHICLES. R7.0' R7.0' R7.0'R3.0' R3.0' R3.0' R7.0' R10.0' R100.0' R3.0' R3.0' LOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C2-1 SITE PLANPlotted: 06 /03 / 2021 5:8 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL PJD 06/03/21 - 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SITE PLAN C2-1 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE NOTES 1.ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2.ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3.ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' WITH A 24' WIDE TWO WAY DRIVE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 3.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.BITUMINOUS IMPREGNATED FIBER BOARD TO BE PLACED AT FULL DEPTH OF CONCRETE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES AND BEHIND CURB ADJACENT TO DRIVEWAYS AND SIDEWALKS. 8.SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 9.ANY EXISTING CONCRETE INFRASTRUCTURE IN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO PUBLIC SIDEWALKS, CURB AND GUTTER, AND ADA PEDESTRIAN RAMPS, THAT IS EITHER CURRENTLY DEFECTIVE OR THAT IS DAMAGED DURING THE TIME OF SITE RE-DEVELOPMENT, MUST BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT TEH TIME OF SITE RE-DEVELOPMENT. 10.SNOW TO BE REMOVED FROM SITE AS NEEDED TO KEEP ALL PARKING STALLS OPEN. 11. ALL DRIVE ISLES TO BE HEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. PARKING STALLS TO BE LIGHT-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SITE PLAN LEGEND BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CURRENT ZONING:RC HIGH-DENSITY MULTIPLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE PROPOSED ZONING PUD PROPERTY AREA :106,459 SF EXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA:65,406 (61.4%) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:75,816 (71.2%) SITE DATA HEAVY-DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT ELEVATION NOTES 919.00 = ARCHITECTURAL 100' 0" (VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURAL) OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS TOTAL PROPOSED SURFACE PARKING PROVIDED = 95 STALLS PROPOSED HANDICAPPED STALLS = 6 STALLS (ABOVE GROUND) REQUIRED HANDICAP STALLS FOR 76-100 STALLS= 4 STALLS (ABOVE GROUND) CONCRETE SIDEWALK City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 48 FIRST FLOOR - 930.33 GARAGE - 919.00 DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA 925930926927928929925 9 2 3 92 4 9 2 5 930923924926 9 2 7 9289 2 9 915 9 1 6 917916 917 917 916 917 9 2 0 921 9 2 2 9 1 6 9 1 7 9 1 8 91 9 91 6 917 918916917 918 91 6 91 7 918 915 916 917 918 919916 914.16 913.20 914.17 915.90 916.30 914.89 914.98 914.24 918.05 918.00 917.64 917.27 917.63 917.35 918.19 919.00 918.30 918.30 918.30 917.94 917.93 918.00 917.46917.23 917.16 917.18 917.46 917.77 917.56 917.25 916.53 915.75 915.67 915.20 915.60 915.76 915.82 916.49 916.76 916.69 916.47 915.65 916.79 915.46 916.80 917.13 917.18 917.81 917.39 919.00 918.91 918.91 919.00 919.00 919.00 918.50 919.00 926.00930.33 TW=923.00 GW=919.00 TW=922.75 GW=919.00GW=921.00 TW=919.00 919.00 2.0% 2.0% 2.0% 2.0%2.4%1.2%2.3%1.5%1.3%1.5%1.0%1.8%917.98 918.30 1.2%918.09 918.06 918.30 1.2%1.3%1.2%2.7%4.2%3.8%2.4%1.0%9.0%3.4%2.8%1.5% 918.79 918.79 918.85 918.51 918.43 1.6%0.2%2.0%1.8% 1.9%8.0%914 6.5%6.6%917.477.9%4.3%917.55 2.1%2.2%918.45 917.95 917.51 922.00 921.78 921.87 919.43 920.00 919.00 3.5%2.6%APARTMENT PLAY AREA 918.85918.35 930.24 930.15 930.09 930.00930.18930.18 930.29930.00 916.61 916.83 917.27917.32 917.73 917.73 917.39917.38 916.97 917.40 917.39 1.0%8888888 8 8 8 8 8 8 918.42 918.12 918.101.8%918.40 88888 8 888 918.50 916.73 919.001.6%916.66 918.13 918.93 918.96 918.85 1.2%916.81 0.9%918917 919.00 919.00 919.00 919.00 919.00 917.11BREAK LINEBREAK LINELOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-1 GRADING PLANPlotted: 06 /03 / 2021 4:45 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL PJD 06/03/21 - 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 GRADING PLAN C3-1 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL NOTES 1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. 4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), AND "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5.RETAINING WALLS OVER 4 FEET IN HEIGHT WILL REQUIRE A BUILDING PERMIT. 6.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 7.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 8.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 9.SEE UTILITY PLANS FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS 11.A POST CONSTRUCTION TEST ON THE FILTRATION TANKS AND RAIN GARDEN WILL BE CONDUCTED BY FILLING THE BASIN TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES WITH WATER AND MONITOR THE TIME NECESSARY TO DRAIN. THE COON CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT SHALL BE NOTIFIED PRIOR TO THE TEST TO WITNESS THE RESULTS. 12.NO GROUNDWATER PUMPING IS ANTICIPATED. IF PUMPING IS REQUIRE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE WELL-FIELD LOCATION, RATES, DISCHARGE LOCATION, SCHEDULE AND QUANTITIES. APPLY FOR DNR WATER APPROPRIATION PERMIT. 13.CONCRETE SIDEWALKS AND HANDICAP RAMPS ARE DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH ADA REGUALTIONS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY CIVIL ENGINEER SHOULD RUNNING SLOPES EXCEED 5% AND CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2%. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 49 FIRST FLOOR - 930.33 GARAGE - 919.00 DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA 925930926927928929925 9 2 3 92 4 9 2 5 930923924926 9 2 7 9289 2 9 915 9 1 6 917916 917 917 916 917 9 2 0 921 9 2 2 9 1 6 9 1 7 9 1 8 91 9 91 6 917 918916917 918 91 6 91 7 918 915 916 917 918 919916 914 44444APARTMENT PLAY AREA 8888888 8 8 8 8 8 8 88888 8 888 918917 INLET PROTECTION (SEE DETAIL) ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL) SILT FENCE TYP. (SEE DETAIL) TREE PROTECTION FENCE (SEE DETAIL) SILT FENCE DOUBLE ROW (SEE DETAIL) SILT FENCE DOUBLE ROW (SEE DETAIL) ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE (SEE DETAIL) LOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-2 SWPPPPlotted: 06 /03 / 2021 4:45 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL PJD 06/03/21 - 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SWPPP C3-2 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SWPPP LEGEND TREE PROTECTION FENCE City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 50 LOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-3 SWPPP NOTESPlotted: 06 /03 / 2021 4:45 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL PJD 06/03/21 - 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS SWPPP NOTES C3-3 1.THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING AN APARTMENT AND DAYCARE BUILDING, ASSOCIATED SURFACE PAVEMENTS, STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS AND UTILITIES. 2.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1.1.INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP 1.2.INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 1.3.CLEAR AND GRUB SITE 1.4.STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 1.5.REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES 1.6.CONSTRUCT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITY 1.7.ROUGH GRADE SITE 1.8.IMPORT CLEAN FILL FOR REPLACEMENT AND BALANCE 1.9.INSTALL UTILITIES 1.10.INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 1.11.INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 1.12.INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND WALKS 1.13.FINAL GRADE SITE 1.14.REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM STORMWATER SYSTEMS 1.15.SEED AND MULCH 1.16.WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. 2.SITE DATA: AREA OF DISTURBANCE:XX± AC PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:XX± AC POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:XX± AC GENERAL SOIL TYPE: SEE GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT 3.THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 4.ALL DISTURBED GROUND LEFT INACTIVE FOR FOURTEEN (14) OR MORE DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SEEDING OR SODDING (ONLY AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15) OR BY MULCHING OR COVERING OR OTHER EQUIVALENT CONTROL MEASURE. 5.ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. 6.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 7.CONCTRACTOR TO PROTECT STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA ONCE EXCAVATED AND PROTECT TREATMENT SYSTEM ONCE INSTALLED. 8.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEPMT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. 9.SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S. 10.SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 11.EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. RUNOFF MUST BE PROPERLY CONTAINED. 12.NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 13.THE OWNER WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. THE OPERATOR (CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE FOR PARTS II.B., PART II.C, PART II.B-F, PART V, PART IV AND APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN APPENDIX A, PART C. OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT. 14.TERMINATION OF COVERAGE-PERMITTEE(S) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE MPCA. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: A.FINAL STABILIZATION, PER NPDES PERMIT PART IV.G. HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE. B.TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT. 15. INSPECTIONS A.INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE IS REQUIRED. B.EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 0.5" OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT. C.STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS D.FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. E.INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR 3 YEARS AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND MUST INCLUDE: DATE AND TIME OF ACTION, NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING WORK, FINDING OF INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION, DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. 16. MINIMUM MAINTENANCE A.SILT FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, SUPPLEMENTED WHEN NONFUNCTIONAL, OR 1/3 FULL; WITHIN 24 HOURS B.SEDIMENT BASINS DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN REACHES 1/2 STORAGE VOLUME. REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. C.SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS WITHIN (7)SEVEN DAYS D.CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS INSPECTED, TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITH 24 HOURS. E.PROVIDE COPIES OF EROSION INSPECTION RESULTS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR ALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 12" IN 24 HOURS 17.THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY THE PERMITTEE(S) WHO HAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE. 18.OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT, THE SWPPP, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE, PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS AFTER FILING NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION. 19.SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN: A.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE B.INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS EXCEEDING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. C.THE BMP'S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. 19.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA A.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASH-OUT CONTAINER WITH RAIN PROTECTION PER PLAN. B.CONCRETE WASH-OUT TO BE IDENTIFIED WITH SIGNAGE STATING "CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA DO NOT OVERFILL". C.CONCRETE WASHOUT WATER NEEDS TO BE PUMPED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF STANDING WATER IN WASHOUT AREA. 20.IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING A WELL OR SPRING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER. 21.PIPE OULTETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 22.FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACVTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 23.RESPONSIBILITIES A.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY A PERSON WHO WILL OVERSEE THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION AND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: CONTACT: __________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ B.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY THE A PERSON WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: CONTACT:__________________________________ COMPANY: __________________________________ PHONE: __________________________________ 24.THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS OR AS-BUILT DRAWINGS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BMPS. SWPPP NOTES ESTIMATED QUANTITIES DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEEA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 1 2,280 22 SITE VICINITY MAP CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER SPECIAL WATERS SEARCH MAP PROJECT SITE N BIO-ROLL LF 200 APPROX. 1 MILE N TREE PROTECTION FENCE LF 90 4'-0"TREE PROTECTION NOTE: INSTALL FENCE AROUND EACH TREE TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO GRADING. FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIP EDGE OR CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. FENCING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 6' TO THE TRUNK OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. THE PERIMETERS FOR TREES BEING PROTECTED SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL TREE PROTECTION AREAS THAT INSTRUCTS WORKERS TO STAY OUT. CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ALL AREAS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. SOIL SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND CHANGES IN CHEMISTRY FROM CONCRETE OR TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS FUELS AND PAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE "TREE PAINT" ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. IF AN OAK IS WOUNDED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY PAINT TO THE WOUND IN ORDER TO PREVENT OAK WILT. ALL DAMAGE TO TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN DRIP EDGE OF TREE 2" X 4" WOOD STAKE, POSITIONED AS NOTED. STRING 4' HIGH, ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING BETWEEN WOOD STAKES PLACED 5' ON CENTER AND PLACED BETWEEN TREE PROTECTION AND DISTURBED AREAS. EXISTING GRADE TREE PROTECTION DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3008LOUCKS City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 51 FIRST FLOOR - 930.33 GARAGE - 919.00 DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA 44444APARTMENT PLAY AREA 8888888 8 8 8 8 8 8 88888 8 888 FIRE HYDRANT CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN WITH 8" DOMESTIC SERVICE GATE VALVE, 6" FIRE SERVICE AND GATE VALVE @ 6" FIRE HYDRANT LEAD PER CITY STANDARDS. VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT OF EXISTING WATER MAIN. 6" FIRE SERVICE. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL. 8" DOMESTIC SERVICE. COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL. 61 LF - 8" PVC @2.00% CORE DRILL 8" SERVICE INTO EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE AT INV=913.00. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT OF EXISTING MANHOLE SAN SERVICE INV=914.22± COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL. SAN SERVICE INV=914.46± COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL. INSTALL 8"x8" WYE AT INV=913.30. FIELD VERIFY EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT OF EXISTING MANHOLE 59 LF - 8" PVC @2.00% FIRE HYDRANT 6" DIP LOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C4-1 SANITARY & WATERMAINPlotted: 06 /03 / 2021 4:46 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL PJD 06/03/21 - 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 SANITARY & WATERMAIN C4-1 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP OR HDPE City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 52 FIRST FLOOR - 930.33 GARAGE - 919.00 DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA 44444APARTMENT PLAY AREA 8888888 8 8 8 8 8 8 88888 8 888 STMH 3 RIM=916.94 INV=910.59 (12") W INV=910.59 (12") NE SEE DETAIL 48" INFILTRATION VAULT (12) 135' - 48" PERFORATED HDPE @ 0.00% WITH 2 HEADERS INV=909.50 ROCK=909.00 3' SAND=906.00 (SEE DETAIL) CB 1 RIM=915.46 INV=912.00 15" 3' SUMP=909.00 CB 2 RIM=915.65 INV=912.00 15" 3' SUMP=909.00 RD INV=912.50 COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL RD INV=912.50 COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL RD INV=912.50 COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL 51 LF - 12" STORM @ 1.96% 32 LF - 12" STORM @ 3.13% 23 LF - 12" STORM @ 4.35% 55 LF - 12" STORM @ 1.82% 12" INV=911.50 12" INV=911.50 15" INV=911.50 15" INV=911.50 28 LF - 15" STORM @ 1.79% 28 LF - 15" STORM @ 1.79% 12" INV=910.70 22 LF - 12" STORM @ 0.50% 129 LF - 12" STORM @ 0.50% 154 LF - 12" STORM @ 0.50%STMH 4 RIM=914.92 INV=909.94 (12") SW INV=909.94 (12") E CORE DRILL 12" STORM INTO EXISTING CATCH BASIN @ INV=909.17 FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT ON CATCH BASIN A B C F D E ACCESS RISER (TYP.) RD INV=912.50 COORDINATE EXACT LOCATION AND INVERT WITH MECHANICAL LOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C4-2 STORM SEWER PLANPlotted: 06 /03 / 2021 4:46 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. PJ Disch - PE 49933 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL PJD 06/03/21 - 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 STORM SEWER C4-2 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. UTILITY PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS, THE CITY AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 1999 EDITION. ALL HDPE CONNECTIONS TO CONCRETE MANHOLES SHALL BE CONNECTED WITH AN INTERNAL RUBBER GASKET OR BY USING ADS WATERSTOP GASKET. ALL SANITARY SEWER MAIN LINE SHALL BE SDR 35. ALL SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE SDR 26. 2. SEE SHEET C8-1 AND THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR SPECIFIC UTILITY DETAILS AND UTILITY SERVICE DETAILS. 3. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION. 4. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 5. ALL SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE AT THE PROPERTY LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY EXCAVATION OR UNDERGROUND WORK. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 8. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 9. ALL NEW WATERMAIN MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 8.0 FEET OF COVER. 10. ADJUST ALL EXISTING STRUCTURES, BOTH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE TO THE PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED AND COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 11. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN DIP CLASS 52 SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 NO MORE THAN 20' DEEP. SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR26 20' - 25' DEEP. STORM SEWER RCP OR HDPE ACCESS RISER RIM ELEVATION RISER NO.ELEVATION A 916.27 B C D E F 917.46 917.92 916.69 916.42 918.08 STORM SEWER SCHEDULE STRUCTURE NO.CASTING MANHOLE SIZE CB 1 CB 2 2 x 3 STMH 3 STMH 4 R-3067 R-3067 2 x 3 R-1642 48" PRECAST R-1642 48" PRECAST City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 53 FRONTAG E R O A D STATE H I G H W A Y N O . 7 DIVISION STREET ITEM 11 ITEM 12 ITEM 10 FIRST FLOOR - 930.33 GARAGE - 919.00 DAYCARE OUTDOOR PLAY AREA 925930926927928929925 9 2 3 92 4 925930923924926927928929915916916 917 917 916 917 9 2 0 921 9 2 2 9 1 6 9 1 7 9 1 8 91 9 91 6 917 918916917 918 91 6 91 7 918 915 916 917 918 916 914 44444APARTMENT PLAY AREA 8888888 8 8 8 88888 8 888 918917 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8888888881 SKH 28 FG 1 SGM 1 SGM 3 SSC 1 BS 1 PS 1 BS 1 BS 1 PS 3 BS 2 PS 1 BS 1 PS 2 KC 1 TH 2 QB 2 INH 5 INH 7 FRH 2 SSC 5 INH 1 YA 3 FG 1 YA 1 SG 5 DH 2 INH 1 YA 1 MJJ 4 LPS 3 MJJ 4 LPS 4 MJJ 1 YA 4 LPS 7 MJJ 3 FG 5 SD 5 SD 4 FG2 MJJ 4 LPS 2 AD 4 LPS 5 MJJ 4 LPS2 AD 4 LPS 5 MJJ 4 LPS 2 AD 4 LPS 5 MJJ 4 LPS 2 AD 1 AD 3 GC 1 MJJ 2 US 3 BL 3 US 1 GB 1 BL 1 SGM 1 SGM 1 GB 2 BL 2 GB 1 US 1 GB 2 US 1 BL 1 SGM 15 AD 11 MJJ 10 ML11 MJJ 14 AD 4 KC 1 GB 2 BL 4 FG 5 SD 5 MJJ 1 GC 5 GC 4 GC 2 INH 1 SKH 1 QB 1 TH 3 AD 2 TY 6 DH 3 INH 1 YA 3 INH 4 DH 9 ARJ 9 SD 5 FRH 3 AUH 7 GC 3 GC 1 YA 1 YA 5 TY 4 TY 4 LPS 1 SG 5 LPS 5 SD 5 SD 7 LPS 1 SSC 2 TH 2 TH 2 SSC 1 SKH 1 PS 1 TH 1 YA 4 TH 4 RB 1 GB 3 BS 1 KC 1 BL 4 FRH 1 TY 5 GC 2 TY 4 TY BIO-SWALE (SEE DETAIL) EDGER TYP. DECIDU2US TREES QTY C2MM2N NAME B2TANICAL NAME C2NT SI=E REMARKS BL 10 B2ULE9ARD LINDEN TLOLD DPHULFDQD CBRXOHYDUGC B B 25CDO GB 7 GINKG2 TREE GLQNJR ELORED B B 25CDO MALE N2NFRUITING KC 7 KENTUCKY C2FFEETREE G\PQRFODGXV GLRLFD B B 25CDO RB 4 RI9ER BIRCH BHWXOD QLJUD B B 8C HGT CLUMP SGM 5 SIENNA GLEN MAPLE AFHU IUHHPDQLL CSLHQQD GOHQC B B 25CDO SKH 3 SKYLINE H2NEYL2CUST GOHGLWVLD WULDFDQWKRV CSN\FROHC B B 25CDO US 8 ST CR2I; AMERICAN ELM UOPXV APHULFDQD CSW CURL[C TM 5 JDO QB 3 S:AMP :HITE 2AK QXHUFXV ELFRORU B B 25CDO E9ERGREEN TREES QTY C2MM2N NAME B2TANICAL NAME C2NT SI=E REMARKS BS 10 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE PLFHD JODXFD CDHQVDWDC B B 6C HGT FULL F2RM PS 6 :HITE PINE PLQXV SWUREXV B B 6C HGT 2RNAMENTAL TREES QTY C2MM2N NAME B2TANICAL NAME C2NT SI=E REMARKS SSC 8 SPRING SN2: CRABAPPLE MDOXV [ CSSULQJ SQRZC B B 15CDO TH 11 TH2RNLESS HA:TH2RN CUDWDHJXV FUXVJDOOL CIQHUPLVC B B 15CDO SHRUBS QTY C2MM2N NAME B2TANICAL NAME MIN C2NT MIN SI=E REMARKS AD 41 ARCTIC FIRE D2G:22D CRUQXV VHULFHD CAUWLF FLUHC 5 JDO 24 HGT DH 15 D:ARF BUSH H2NEYSUCKLE DLHUYLOOD ORQLFHUD 5 JDO 18 HGT GC 28 GL2SSY BLACK CH2KEBERRY AURQLD PHODQRFDUSD HODWD 5 JDO 24 HGT INH 22 INCREDIBALL HYDRANGEA H\GUDQJHD DUERUHVFHQV CIQFUHGLEDOOC 5 JDO 24 HGT LPS 56 LITTLE PRINCESS SPIREA SSLUHD MDSRQLFD CLLWWOH PULQFHVVC 5 JDO 24 HGT ML 10 MISS KIM LILAC S\ULQJD SDWXOD CMLVV KLPC 5 JDO 24 HGT GRASSES QTY C2MM2N NAME B2TANICAL NAME MIN C2NT MIN SI=E REMARKS FG 42 FEATHER REED GRASS CDODPDJURVWLV [ DFXWLIORUD CKDUO FRHUVWHUC 1 JDO C2NIFER2US SHRUBS QTY C2MM2N NAME B2TANICAL NAME MIN C2NT MIN SI=E REMARKS ARJ 9 ARCADIA JUNIPER JXQLSHUXV VDELQD CAUFDGLDC 5 JDO 18 SPRD MJJ 60 MINT JULEP JUNIPER JXQLSHUXV FKLQHQVLV CMRQOHSC 5 JDO 18 SPRD SG 2 SEA GREEN JUNIPER JXQLSHUXV FKLQHQVLV CSHD GUHHQC 5 JDO 18 SPRD TY 18 TAUNT2N YE:TD[XV [ PHGLD CTDXQWRQC 5 JDO 18 SPRD YA 8 YELL2: RIBB2N ARB2R9ITAE TKXMD RFFLGHQWDOLV YHOORZ RLEERQC 10 JDO 36 HGT PERENNIALS QTY C2MM2N NAME B2TANICAL NAME MIN C2NT MIN SI=E REMARKS AUH 3 AURE2MARGINATA H2STA HRVWD PRQWDQD CAXUHRPDUJLQDWDC 1 JDO FRH 16 FRANCEE H2STA HRVWD CFUDQFHHC 1 JDO SD 34 STELLA DC 2R2 DAYLILY HHPHURFDOOLV [ CSWHOOD GH 2URC 1 JDO PLANT SCHEDULE Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Douglas D. Loken - LA 45591 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.19875 PJD DDL DDL 06/09/21 - LOUCKS W:\2019\19875\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L1-1 Landscape PlanPlotted: 06 /09 / 2021 3:58 PM7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE QUALITY CONTROL CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. CADD QUALIFICATION RISE ON 7 APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK, MN COMMONBOND 1080 Montreal Ave. St. Paul, MN 55116 04/19/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 05/13/21 CITY SUBMITTAL 06/03/21 PRICING SET C1-1 C2-1 C3-1 C3-2 C3-3 C4-1 C4-2 C8-1 L1-1 L1-2 DEMO PLAN SITE PLAN GRADING PLAN SWPPP SWPPP NOTES SANITARY AND WATERMAIN STORM SEWER CIVIL DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS N SCALE IN FEET 0 20 40 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1-1 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GENERAL NOTES CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES AND PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR SAME BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS (MINIMUM 10' - 0" CLEARANCE). ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHALL BE LAID SO THAT TRENCHES DO NOT CUT THROUGH ROOT SYSTEMS OF ANY EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IRRIGATION NOTES: LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION LAYOUT WILL BE SUBMITTED TO THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. CONTRACTOR TO CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO NOT SPRAY THE BUILDING. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING/SOD/SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: CALCULATIONS BASED ON R-4 MULTI-FAMILY DISTRICT. 1- TREE PER DWELLING UNIT - (# OF UNITS = 120) REQUIRED TREES = 120 TREES - 17 EXISTING = 103 TREES REQUIRED INCHES FOR TREE MITIGATION =207 INCHES PROPOSED TREES (LANDSCAPE ORD.): = 63 OVERSTORY/CONIFER TREES 19 ORNAMENTAL TREES PROPOSED MITIGATION CAL INCHES:0 INCHES SOD PLANTING BED - SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. COLOR: TBD DORA CALCULATIONS: SITE AREA = 107,348 SQ.FT. DORA REQUIRED (12% OF GROSS FLOOR AREA) = 12,882 SQ.FT. DORA PROPOSED = 13,717 SQ.FT. (MARKED ON PLAN WITH HATCH) HATCH LEGEND TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS: REFER TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN (C1-1) FOR TREE REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS. INCHES OF REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED:177 NATIVE SEED MIXTURE City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 54 FD A5013 SD_502 3 A501 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F G H44'-0"Elev. Lobby 056 Stair B 064 40393837363534333231 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 A500 1 A501 1 A501 6 Kitchen 017 Preschool 018 Preschool 019 Toddlers 020 Trash 022 Restroom 023 Infants 024 Teacher's Office 025 Gross Motor / Meeting 026 Corridor 021 Director's Office 027 Vest. 028 Maintenance 029 107'-4"64'-8"14'-4"12'-8"17'-0"2'-0"7'-4" M.O.5'-0"2'-0"5'-4" M.O.4'-4"5'-4" M.O.6'-8"8"M.O.3'-4"2'-0"14'-4"12'-8"17'-0"19'-0"1'-4"14'-4"8'-4"19'-0"1'-4"6'-0"7'-4" M.O.8'-0"5'-4" M.O.2'-0"2'-0"7'-4" M.O.5'-0"2'-4"M.O.3'-4"2'-8"5'-8"M.O.3'-4"2'-8"3'-0"5'-4" M.O.4'-8"M.O.3'-4"2'-8"5'-4"M.O.3'-4"2'-4"5'-0"7'-4" M.O.2'-0"162'-0" 7'-9" 15'-4"8'-8"3'-4" M.O. 8"6'-0" 15'-4"18'-8"15'-4"8'-11" 7'-9"11'-3"22'-9"4'-3"27'-0"2'-9"24'-3" 100'-0"8'-6 3/8"6'-10 1/2"2'-8"8'-11 1/2"8'-0"6'-8"2'-7 5/8"3'-4"3'-4"2'-6"4'-11"2'-7 3/8"6'-0 3/8"6'-4"17'-9"2'-0"3'-4"7'-7"5'-2"7'-10"4 3/8"3'-4"5'-0"13'-0 1/4"4'-7 3/4"25'-0 5/8"22'-8 3/8"6'-3 7/8"13'-2 3/4"8'-1 5/8"10'-7 3/4" 26'-7"1'-5 5/8"2'-0"4'-1"4'-11 3/8" 2'-3" 26'-8 3/4" 6'-4" 2'-1 3/4"7'-4 1/4" 028a 027 028b 024a 025 064a 022a 023 020a 017 019a 018a 019c 018c 056 029 022b 013d Garage 013 020b 064b 024b 1'-2"6'-4"3'-6" M6b M6b M6bI1 I2 I1 M6b M8b M6b M6b 020c M6b M6b M6b M6b M6b M6b M6b M8b M6b M8b M6b M6b M6b I2 I2 I2 I1 I2 I1 M6b I2 I1 I1 I1 M6bM6b M8b M6b M6b M3a M6bM6b M6b EXAUST FAN 1'-0" 7'-7 1/4" HOLD FOR LATER 1. RADON SYSTEM 2. SUMP PUMP LOCATIONS 3. ELEVATOR SUMP PUMP A. WHERE DO THEY DAYLIGHT? 4. HOSE BIB LOCATIONS 5. ELECT. PANELS 25 Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP 4'-0"5'-0" SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP 5'-0"5'-0" SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP 5'-0" 5'-0"5'-0"SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP F.E. 1 F.E. 2 F.E. 2 BOLLARD 1 A610 [No Slope] [No Slope] A621 1 MF2c MF2cMF2c MF2cMF2cMF2cMF2cMF2cMF2cMF2cMF2c MF2cMF2c MF2c MF2c MF2c MF2c MF2c MF1c MF2c MF2c MF2c MF2c MF2c MF2c 88'-8"88'-8" 1 A622 ELEVATOR SUMP PITW/ CAST IRON CAP 5'-10"12'-0" M.O.4'-8"6'-0"2'-8"10'-8" M.O.5'-0"12'-0" M.O.5'-10" 019b 018b MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A301/1A3011'-4"19'-0"24'-0"19'-0"1'-4" 6'-0" 14'-4"4'-8"35'-8"7'-4"8'-0"8'-4"2'-8"11'-8"15'-4"5'-8"15'-4"6'-0"2'-4"14'-4"10'-4" 2'-8"9'-0" M.O.2'-8"2'-4"6'-0" M.O.3'-4"6'-0" M.O.4'-0"6'-0" M.O.4'-8"6'-0" M.O.2'-0"2'-8"10'-0" M.O.2'-8"8'-4"14'-4"21'-0"15'-4"8'-4"14'-4"10'-4" 12'-0"3'-0" GARAGE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS (OR EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE AT CIP WALLS) OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS, AND FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. SEE SHEET A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 4. SEE SHEET A880-A882 FOR FIRE- CAULKING ASSEMBLIES AT PENETRATIONS, FIRE CAULKING USED BY EACH TRADE SHALL BE OF THE SAME MANUFACTURER - G.C. TO COORDINATE. 5. PROTECT ALL PLUMBING EQUIPMENT SEE PIPE SHIELD DETAILS ON A300. 6. 4" WHITE PAINT STRIPE TYPICAL AT ALL PARKING STALLS, 9'-0" CL TO CL, U.N.O. 7. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS AS NOTED. 8. GEODETIC ELEVATION 930.33 FROM CIVIL PLANS = 100'-0" IN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 9. NUMBER ALL PARKING STALLS 50" AFF. 10. LOCATE A TYPE FE2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER EVERY 150' OF GARAGE. MEASURED FROM END TO END OF GARAGE SPACE. PROVIDE A FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN EACH ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM. 11. AT GARAGE LEVEL - USE FRT WOOD STUDS OR METAL STUDS AND MOISTURE-RESISTANT GYP. BOARD. 13. PAINT ALL PRECAST COLUMNS IN THE PARKING AREA YELLOW. WEST EAST KEY PLAN -LEVEL P NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:46:33 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel P West Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3008115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level P-West N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 55 FD FD FD FD FD SBSB UP FDA502 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 9 3 H I J K L M N O P Q A501 4 Garage 013 Trash 015 Mech. 016 Elec. 014 Stair A 063 A5022 3 A611 1 A611 4 A610 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6160595857565554535251504948474645444342414039 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 A500 2 A502 1 Lobby 002 Mail 003 Office 007Work Room 006Office 005 Office 008 Vest. 001 Mech. 004 Parcel 009 Files 011 Restroom 010 A501 5 c u b b i e s 166'-4"64'-8" 223'-0" 10'-8"15'-4" 1'-0" 7'-4"14'-4"5'-4"15'-8"11'-4"4'-0"8'-4"14'-4"4"20'-8"6'-4"9'-0"8'-4"8'-8"5'-8"13'-4"24'-0"4'-8"14'-4" 1 0 2 °72'-5 5/8" 12'-1"14'-4"7"20'-1"6'-11"7'-5"11'-0 5/8"8'-6 3/8" 12'-1"14'-11"5'-0"6'-4"8'-9"6'-11"7'-5"11'-0 5/8" 2 '-3 1 /2 " 7 '-4 " 3 '-4 "7 '-4 "3 '-4 " 8 '-0 " 5 '-8 1 /8 " 7 '-4 " 4 '-4 "3 '-4 "4 '-8 " 7 '-4 " 5 '-4 " 7 '-4 "2 '-4 "3 '-4 "8 '-3 3 /8 " 5 9 '-3 1 /2 " 8 '-0 " 2 3 '-7 1 /2 " 1'-4"19'-0"24'-0"19'-0"1'-4"11'-2 5/8"9'-0"35'-8"14'-4"015b 015a 014 001b 001a 005 006 007 008 009b 004 002a 002b 011 010 016 013b 013c 063a 009a 2 '-0 "5 " 1 0 '-7 " 2 '-0 " 4 '-5 " 6 '-7 " 2 '-0 " 5 '-0 " 2 '-0 "2 '-0 " 1 0 '-1 1 7 /8 " 6 '-1 0 3 /8 " 3 '-1 0 "1'-4"20'-0"4'-8"3'-4"3'-0"9'-0"3'-4"12'-8" 102°1 0 2 °Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2) Level 1 Chargers (2)8'-10"7'-3"11'-4 3/4"7'-7 1/4"1'-0"3'-1 1/2"6'-0" CLR10'-3 1/4"13'-7 3/4"3'-4"81'-8 5/8"AIR HANDLER UNIT BOLLARDBOLLARD 14'-4"35'-8"9'-0"3'-0"15'-4"8'-8"17'-0"19'-0"1'-4"14'-4"8'-4"19'-0"I1 I2 I1 I1 I2 MF3a MF1a MF3a M3a M3a M3a MF3a M3a M3a I4a M3a MF3a I2 MF3a MF3a I1 I2 I2 I1 MF3a MF3a I2 M3a M3a M3a M3a M3a M3a M3a M3aM3a M3a M3a M3a 6'-0"I2 I2 I2I2 I2 I2 I2 I2 I2 I1 M3a M3aM3a MF3b MF3b MF3b MF3b MF3bMF3b MF3b MF3b MF3b MF3b MF3a M3a 2'-0"19'-0"1'-4"3'-4"4'-8"5'-11 3/4"M3a I1 I2 I1 5'-0"SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP S E E S T R U C T . F O R S T O O P 5'-0"SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP C A N O P Y A B O V E F.E. 2 F.E. 2 F.E. 2 F.E. 2 FLAMMABLE WASTE TRAP PER PLUMBING 1 A600 2 A610 5 A611 6 A611 A501 6 2 A611 5 A610 [No Slope][No Slope] [No Slope] DOOR ACTUATOR A620 1 88'-8" 88'-8" 88'-8" 88'-8" 88'-8" SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP 2 A622 ELEVATOR SUMP PITW/ CAST IRON CAP 2 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 4 3 2 1 4'-0"SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP 4'-0"SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A300/1A30015'-4"8'-4"14'-4"5'-4"15'-8"15'-4"8'-4"14'-4"21'-0"2'-4"4'-0"9'-0"8'-4"1'-8"4'-0"8'-8"42'-0"14'-4"4'-8"5'-4"4'-4"32'-4"3'-4"12'-0"15'-4"46'-0"14'-4"28'-8"23'-0"16'-0"8"4'-0"21'-0"70'-2 5/8"14'-4"10'-8"14'-4"8'-6"4'-0"25 3 A610 4 A611 063b GARAGE PLAN GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS (OR EXTERIOR FACE OF CONCRETE AT CIP WALLS) OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS, AND FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 3. SEE SHEET A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 4. SEE SHEET A880-A882 FOR FIRE- CAULKING ASSEMBLIES AT PENETRATIONS, FIRE CAULKING USED BY EACH TRADE SHALL BE OF THE SAME MANUFACTURER - G.C. TO COORDINATE. 5. PROTECT ALL PLUMBING EQUIPMENT SEE PIPE SHIELD DETAILS ON A300. 6. 4" WHITE PAINT STRIPE TYPICAL AT ALL PARKING STALLS, 9'-0" CL TO CL, U.N.O. 7. SLOPE CONCRETE TO FLOOR DRAINS AS NOTED. 8. GEODETIC ELEVATION 930.33 FROM CIVIL PLANS = 100'-0" IN ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. 9. NUMBER ALL PARKING STALLS 50" AFF. 10. LOCATE A TYPE FE2 FIRE EXTINGUISHER EVERY 150' OF GARAGE. MEASURED FROM END TO END OF GARAGE SPACE. PROVIDE A FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN EACH ELEVATOR EQUIPMENT ROOM. 11. AT GARAGE LEVEL - USE FRT WOOD STUDS OR METAL STUDS AND MOISTURE-RESISTANT GYP. BOARD. 13. PAINT ALL PRECAST COLUMNS IN THE PARKING AREA YELLOW. WEST EAST KEY PLAN -LEVEL P NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:46:37 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel P East Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3018115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level P-East N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 56 UP A5013 A501 2 4 6 9 A D Laundry 158 Elec. 157 Elev. Lobby 156 Stair B 164 Mech. 159 Corridor West 151 A500 1 A501 1 A501 6 9"44'-2 3/4"34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"24'-10 3/4" 100'-10 1/2" 157 156 159 158 164 151 27'-8"6'-8"5'-0" 10 3/8" 2'-5 1/4"7'-8" 1'-1 5/8" 4'-8"4'-8"34'-0"34'-0"34'-1 1/4" 2'-4"2'-1"S2bS2b I4a I4a S2bS2b P1 P3 I3bI3b C2b C2bC2b I4aI4a C2b P1 F.E. 1 F.E. 1 F3a F2a F2a 1 A610 /1A311/1A311MATCHLINEMATCHLINERD & ORD A621 2 164a 1 A622 Unit 1-3 A4521 114 Unit 2-1 A4541 115 Unit 1-1 A4511 116 Unit 2-1 A4541 117 Unit 3-2 A4581 118 Unit 1-1 A4511 119 Unit 3-1 A4571 120 Unit 3-4 A4601 121 Unit 2-1 A4541 122 Unit 2-1 A4541 1239"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"9'-6 1/4"10'-5 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-9"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"7"9"28'-8"12'-10"21'-1"30'-5"12'-10"107'-4"9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9" 64'-8"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"5'-11"12'-10"31'-2"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-6"10'-4"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"5'-9 3/4"4'-10 1/4"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"5'-5"6'-6 1/2" 12'-10"41'-10"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"11'-11 1/2" 9" 3'-7"4'-11"1'-11" 6'-6" 5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"4'-0"6'-6 1/2" 8'-6"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"10'-6 1/2" Unit 2-4 A4541 124 9"27'-2 3/4"25'-0"9'-4"42'-11 1/4"9"9"42'-11 1/4"4'-5 1/2"6'-2 1/4"9'-4"8'-0"6'-9 7/8"26'-9 1/8"9"44'-9"162'-10 1/2" 1'-4"30'-3"30'-3"1'-4" 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:46:40 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 1 West Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3108115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 1-West N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 57 UPUP A502 3 1 6 9 N Q A501 4 Community Room 170 Activity Room 169 Elev. Lobby 152 Laundry 154 Elec. 153 Stair A 163 Mech. 155 A5022 Trash / Recycling 161 Elec. 162 Jan. 160 3 A611 Bike Storage 166 Bike Storage 167 Bike Storage 165 Corridor East 150 Vestibule 173 1 A611 4 A610 A500 2 A502 1 Storage 172 Toilet 171 Computers 174 A501 5 34'-1 1/4"25'-0"34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"1'-0 1/4"6'-2"5'-9"12'-0 3/4"44'-3 1/4" 9" 160'-1 1/2"103'-9"151 150 161 162 169 171 170a 172 170b 169b 170c 173a 173b165 166167 152 174 153 155 154 24'-10 3/4"10'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"12'-0 3/4"12'-11 1/4"4'-8"4'-8" 2'-7 1/8" 7'-8" 2'-5 1/4" 5'-10 3/8"6'-8"26'-11"9" 2'-2"3'-2 3/8" 1'-3 5/8" 3'-4"4'-0"4'-0"10'-0"8'-11"9"2'-2" P1P1 I3b S2b S2b C2b S2b P1 C2b C2b 6'-4"5'-8 3/4"6'-4 3/4"6'-6 1/2"8'-4" P1 I4aI3a P1 9"26'-11"6'-8"4'-6"3'-6"9'-4"10'-7 3/4"25'-0"34'-0"43'-8 1/4"5'-0 3/4"5'-0 3/4"2'-1 1/8"3'-8 3/8"6'-0 7/8" C2b I4a C2b P1 P1 C2b I4a S2bS2b S2b S2b F4b C2b I3bI3b C2bP1 I4a I4a C2b I4a P3 2'-4 3/8"9"42'-11 1/4"9'-4"34'-0"25'-0"25'-0"27'-2 3/4"1'-4"2'-8" 2'-2" 5'-4"7'-10"2'-4"6'-4"A501 6 F.E. 1 1 A600 F2a F2a F3a I4a C2b 42 spots42 spots 42 spots 2 A610 CANOPY ABOVE SEE STRUCT. FOR STOOP 5 A611 6 A611 2 A611 5 A610 /1A310/1A310MATCHLINEMATCHLINEDOOR ACTUATOR RD & ORD A620 2 2 A622 Unit 1-2 A4512 100 Unit 2-2 A4551 101 Unit 3-4 A4601 102 Unit 3-1 A4571 103 Unit 1-2 A4512 105 Unit 1-1 A4511 106 Unit 3-3 A4591 107 Unit 2-1 A4541 111 Unit 1-1 A4511 112 Unit 1-3 A4521 125 Unit 1-1 A4511 126 Unit 1-2 A4512 127 Unit 1-1 A4511 128 Unit 1-1 A4511 129 Unit 2-1 A4541 104 7'-4 3/4"P1 9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"10'-3"6'-2"6'-7"9'-5"12'-5"8'-0"6'-2"5'-11"90'-2"12'-10"9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9" 64'-8"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"19'-0"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"10'-10"8'-0"6'-2"10'-8"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-9"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"7"9"12'-10"49'-2"13'-10"47'-6"12'-10"28'-8"166'-4"6'-6 1/2"4'-0"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"11'-0"5'-3"1'-7"7'-8"2'-8"1'-11"4'-4"5'-6"11"11'-1"10"6'-3"11'-2 7/8"10'-10"10'-1 1/8"5'-1"8'-1"4'-9"9" 10'-6 1/2"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"43'-6"12'-10" 6'-6 1/2"5'-5"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-1 1/4"10'-9 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"8'-0"6'-2"10'-8"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-11"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"14'-2" 5'-1" 9" 11'-11 1/2"12'-10"22'-2"12'-10"37'-2"12'-10"12'-2"12'-10"25'-4" Unit 2-4 A4541 113 222'-1 1/2" 1'-4"30'-3"30'-3"1'-4" F.E. 1 3 A610 4 A611 163 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:46:46 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 1 East Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3118115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 1-East N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 58 UP A5013 A501 2 4 6 9 A D Laundry 258 Elec. 257 Elev. Lobby 256 Mech. 259 Stair B 264 A500 1 A501 1 A501 6 44'-0"100'-10 1/2" 8'-6"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"10'-6 1/2"107'-4"9"7"28'-1"12'-10"51'-6"12'-10"9"64'-8"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"9'-6 1/4"10'-5 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"10'-6"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"48'-1 3/4"6'-2 1/4"9'-4"3'-6"4'-6"33'-7"9"2'-4"2'-1"34'-4"5'-0" 10 3/8" 2'-5 1/4"7'-8" 1'-1 5/8" 4'-8"4'-8"34'-0"34'-0"34'-1 1/4" 251 257 256 259 258 264 251 S2bS2b I4a I4a S2bS2b P1 P3I3bI3b C2b C2bC2b I4aI4a C2b P1 1'-4"30'-3"30'-3"1'-4" F.E. 1 F.E. 1 F3a F2a F2a 1 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A321/1A321RD & ORD RD & ORD A621 3 1 A622 Unit 1-3 A4521 214 Unit 2-1 A4541 215 Unit 1-1 A4511 216 Unit 2-3 Type AA4561 217 Unit 3-2 A4581 218 Unit 1-1 A4511 219 Unit 3-1 A4571 220 Unit 3-1 A4571 221 Unit 2-1 A4541 222 Unit 2-1 A4541 223 Unit 2-4 A4541 224 9"3'-7"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"4'-0"6'-6 1/2"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"5'-11"9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9"12'-10"31'-2"43'-5"1'-4"9"12'-10"41'-10"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"11'-11 1/2" 4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-6"10'-4"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"5'-5"6'-6 1/2" 162'-10 1/2"42'-11 1/4"9'-4"25'-0"27'-2 3/4"1'-4"9" 44'-2 3/4" 34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"24'-10 3/4" 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:46:49 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 2 West Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3208115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 2-West N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 59 UP A502 3 1 6 9 N Q Elev. Lobby 252 Laundry 254 Elec. 253 Stair A 263 Mech. 255 A5022 Trash / Recycling 261 Elec. 262 Jan. 260 1 A611 4 A610 A500 2 A502 1 1'-4"31'-0"31'-0"1'-4" CANOPY 24'-10 3/4"10'-0"129'-8"4'-8" 2'-3 1/8" 8'-0" 2'-5 1/4" 5'-10 3/8"34'-4" 251 250 261 262 252 253 255 254 251 A501 6 9"26'-11"6'-8"4'-6"3'-6"9'-4"10'-7 3/4"25'-0"34'-0"42'-11 1/4"9"5'-0 3/4"2'-1 1/8"3'-8 3/8"2'-4 3/8" P1P1 I3b S2b S2b C2b S2b P1 C2b C2b P1 C2b I4a S2bS2b S2b S2b F4b C2b I3bI3b C2bP1 I4a C2b I4a P3 2'-2"3'-2 3/8" 1'-3 5/8" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-1 5/8"9'-6 3/8"2'-2" F.E. 1 1 A600 F2a F2a F3a I4a C2b 2 A610 2 A611 5 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A320/1A320RD & ORD A620 3 2 A622 Unit 1-2 A4512 200 Unit 2-2 A4551 201 Unit 3-1 A4571 202 Unit 3-1 A4571 203 Unit 1-2 A4512 205 Unit 1-1 A4511 206 Unit 3-3 A4591 207 Unit 1-1 A4511 208 Unit 2-1 A4541 209 Unit 1-1 A4511 210 Unit 2-1 A4541 211 Unit 1-1 A4511 212 Unit 1-3 A4521 225 Unit 1-1 A4511 226 Unit 1-2 A4512 227 Unit 1-1 A4511 228 Unit 1-1 A4511 229 Unit 1-5 A4531 230 Unit 2-1 A4541 204 Unit 2-4 A4541 213 103'-9"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"10'-3"6'-2"6'-7"9'-5"12'-5"8'-0"6'-2"5'-11"90'-2"12'-10"9"4'-9"8'-7 5/8"4'-2 3/8"10'-2"10'-4"9'-6 1/4"9'-5 3/4"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"10'-10"8'-0"6'-2"10'-8"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-9"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"7"9"13'-4 5/8"48'-7 3/8"13'-10"47'-6"12'-10"28'-8"166'-4"222'-1 1/2" 9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9" 64'-8" 6'-6 1/2"4'-0"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"5'-11"5'-0"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"11'-2 7/8"10'-10"10'-1 1/8"5'-1"9'-3"3'-7"9" 160'-1 1/2" 10'-6 1/2"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"43'-6"12'-10" 6'-6 1/2"5'-5"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-1 1/4"10'-9 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"8'-0"11'-0 1/4"5'-9 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-11"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"8'-0"11'-3"9" 11'-11 1/2"12'-10"22'-2"12'-10"37'-2"12'-10"12'-2"12'-10"25'-4"9"42'-11 1/4"9'-4"34'-0"25'-0"25'-0"27'-2 3/4"1'-4"9"34'-1 1/4"25'-0"34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"25'-0"44'-3 1/4"9" F.E. 1 3 A610 4 A611 263 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:46:54 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 2 East Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3218115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 2-East N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 60 A5013 A501 2 4 6 9 A D Laundry 358 Elec. 357 Elev. Lobby 356 Stair B 364 Mech. 359 A500 1 A501 1 A501 6 44'-0"48'-1 3/4"6'-2 1/4"9'-4"3'-6"4'-6"33'-7"9"2'-4"2'-1"34'-4"5'-0" 10 3/8" 2'-5 1/4" 7'-4" 1'-5 5/8" 4'-8"4'-8"34'-0"34'-0"34'-1 1/4" 1'-4"30'-3"30'-3"1'-4" 351351351 357 356 359 358 364 351 S2bS2b I4a I4a S2bS2b P1 P3I3bI3b C2b C2bC2b I4aI4a C2b P1 F.E. 1 F.E. 1 F3a F2a F2a 1 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A331/1A331RD & ORD RD & ORD A621 3 Sim 1 A622 Unit 1-3 A4521 314 Unit 2-1 A4541 315 Unit 1-1 A4511 316 Unit 2-1 A4541 317 Unit 3-2 A4581 318 Unit 1-1 A4511 319 Unit 3-1 A4571 320 Unit 3-1 A4571 321 Unit 2-1 A4541 322 Unit 2-1 A4541 323 Unit 2-4 A4541 324 64'-8" 9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9"107'-4"9"7"28'-1"12'-10"51'-6"12'-10"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"9'-6 1/4"10'-5 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"10'-6"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"9"12'-10"41'-10"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"11'-11 1/2" 4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-6"10'-4"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"5'-5"6'-6 1/2" 162'-10 1/2" 100'-10 1/2" 8'-6"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"10'-6 1/2" 9"3'-7"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"4'-0"6'-6 1/2"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"5'-11"12'-10"31'-2"43'-5"1'-4"43'-5 7/8"9'-0"25'-4"27'-9 3/8"1'-4"9" 44'-2 3/4" 34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"24'-10 3/4" 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:46:58 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 3 West Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3308115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 3-West N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 61 A502 3 1 6 9 N Q Elev. Lobby 352 Laundry 354 Elec. 353 Stair A 363 Mech. 355 A50221 A611 4 A610 Elec. 362 Trash / Recycling 361 Jan. 360 A500 2 A502 1 1'-4"31'-0"31'-0"1'-4" A501 6 24'-10 3/4"10'-0"129'-8"4'-8" 2'-3 1/8" 8'-0" 2'-5 1/4" 5'-10 3/8"9"26'-11"6'-8"4'-6"3'-6"9'-4"10'-7 3/4"25'-0"34'-0"42'-11 1/4"9"5'-0 3/4"2'-1 1/8"3'-8 3/8"2'-4 3/8" 2'-2"3'-2 3/8" 1'-3 5/8" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-1 5/8"9'-6 3/8"2'-2" P1P1 I3b S2b S2b C2b S2b P1 C2b C2b P1 C2b I4a S2bS2b S2b S2b F4b C2b I3bI3b C2bP1 I4a C2b I4a P3 351 350 361 362 352 353 355 354 351351351 F.E. 1 1 A600 F2a F2a F3a I4a C2b 2 A610 2 A611 5 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A330/1A330RD & ORD A620 3 Sim 2 A622 Unit 1-2 A4512 300 Unit 2-2 A4551 301 Unit 3-1 A4571 302 Unit 3-1 A4571 303 Unit 1-5 A4531 305 Unit 1-1 A4511 306 Unit 3-3 A4591 307 Unit 1-1 A4511 308 Unit 2-3 Type AA4561 309 Unit 1-1 A4511 310 Unit 2-1 A4541 311 Unit 1-1 A4511 312 Unit 1-3 A4521 325 Unit 1-1 A4511 326 Unit 1-2 A4512 327 Unit 1-1 A4511 328 Unit 1-1 A4511 329 Unit 1-2 A4512 330 Unit 2-1 A4541 304 Unit 2-4 A4541 313 103'-9"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"10'-3"6'-2"6'-7"9'-5"12'-5"8'-0"6'-2"5'-2"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"9'-6 1/4"9'-5 3/4"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"10'-10"8'-0"6'-2"10'-8"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-9"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"7"9"12'-10"49'-2"13'-10"47'-6"12'-10"28'-8"166'-4"222'-1 1/2" 6'-6 1/2"4'-0"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"5'-11"5'-0"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"11'-2 7/8"10'-10"10'-1 1/8"5'-1"9'-3"3'-7"9" 10'-6 1/2"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"43'-6"12'-10"90'-2"12'-10"9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9" 64'-8" 160'-1 1/2" F.E. 1 F.E. 1 6'-6 1/2"5'-5"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-1 1/4"10'-9 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"8'-0"11'-0 1/4"5'-9 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-11"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"8'-0"11'-3"9" 11'-11 1/2"12'-10"22'-2"12'-10"37'-2"12'-10"12'-2"12'-10"25'-4"2 3/8"43'-5 7/8"9'-4"34'-0"25'-0"25'-0"27'-2 3/4"9"1'-4"34'-1 1/4"25'-0"34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"25'-0"44'-3 1/4"9" 3 A610 4 A611 363 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:47:03 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 3 East Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3318115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 3-East N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 62 A5013 A501 2 4 6 9 A D Laundry 458 Elec. 457 Elev. Lobby 456 Stair B 464 Mech. 459 A500 1 A501 1 A501 6 44'-0"451 457 456 459 458 464 45148'-1 3/4"6'-2 1/4"9'-4"3'-6"4'-6"34'-4"2'-4"2'-1"34'-4"5'-0" 10 3/8" 2'-5 1/4" 7'-4" 1'-5 5/8" 4'-8"4'-8"34'-0"34'-0"34'-1 1/4" 1'-4"30'-3"30'-3"1'-4" S2bS2b I4a I4a S2bS2b P1 P3I3bI3b C2b C2bC2b I4aI4a C2b P1 451451451451 F.E. 1 F.E. 1 F3a F2a F2a 1 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A341/1A341RD & ORD RD & ORD A621 4 1 A622 Unit 1-3 A4521 414 Unit 2-1 A4541 415 Unit 1-1 A4511 416 Unit 2-1 A4541 417 Unit 3-2 A4581 418 Unit 1-1 A4511 419 Unit 3-1 A4571 420 Unit 3-1 A4571 421 Unit 2-1 A4541 422 Unit 2-1 A4541 423 Unit 2-4 A4541 424 64'-8" 9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9"107'-4"9"7"28'-1"12'-10"51'-6"12'-10"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"9'-6 1/4"10'-5 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"10'-6"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"9"12'-10"41'-10"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"11'-11 1/2" 4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-6"10'-4"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"5'-5"6'-6 1/2" 162'-10 1/2" 100'-10 1/2" 8'-6"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"20'-2"13'-10"10'-6 1/2" 9"3'-7"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"9'-8"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"4'-0"6'-6 1/2"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"5'-11"12'-10"31'-2"43'-5"1'-4"43'-5 7/8"9'-0"25'-4"27'-9 3/8"1'-4"9" 44'-2 3/4" 34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"24'-10 3/4" 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:47:07 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 4 West Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3408115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 4-West N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 63 A502 3 1 6 9 N Q Elev. Lobby 452 Laundry 454 Elec. 453 Mech. 455 A5022 Trash / Recycling 461 Elec. 462 Jan. 460 1 A611 4 A610 A500 2 A502 1 451451 P1P1 I3b S2b S2b C2b S2b P1 C2b C2b P1 C2b I4a I4a C2b S2bS2b S2b S2b F4b C2b I3bI3b C2bP1 I4a C2b I4a P3 451 450 461 462 452 453 455 454 451451451 24'-10 3/4"10'-0"129'-8"4'-8" 2'-3 1/8" 8'-0" 2'-5 1/4" 5'-10 3/8"9"26'-11"6'-8"4'-6"3'-6"9'-4"10'-7 3/4"101'-11 1/4"9"5'-0 3/4"2'-1 1/8"3'-8 3/8"2'-4 3/8" 2'-2"3'-2 3/8" 1'-3 5/8" 3'-4"4'-0"10'-1 5/8"9'-6 3/8"0"2'-2" A501 6 F.E. 1 1 A600 F2a F2a F3a 2 A610 2 A611 5 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A340/1A340RD & ORD A620 4 2 A622 Unit 1-2 A4512 400 Unit 2-2 A4551 401 Unit 3-1 A4571 402 Unit 3-1 A4571 403 Unit 2-1 A4541 404 Unit 1-2 A4512 405 Unit 1-1 A4511 406 Unit 3-3 A4591 407 Unit 1-1 A4511 408 Unit 2-1 A4541 409 Unit 1-1 A4511 410 Unit 2-1 A4541 411 Unit 1-1 A4511 412 Unit 1-3 A4521 425 Unit 1-1 A4511 426 Unit 1-2 A4512 427 Unit 1-1 A4511 428 Unit 1-1 A4511 429 Unit 1-2 A4512 430 Unit 2-4 A4541 413 222'-1 1/2" 6'-6 1/2"4'-0"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"5'-11"5'-0"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"10'-8"5'-7"5'-5"6'-6"1'-11"4'-11"4'-11"4'-9"6'-2"1'-11"6'-3"11'-2 7/8"10'-10"10'-1 1/8"5'-1"9'-3"3'-7"9" 10'-6 1/2"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"22'-6"13'-10"9'-10"12'-10"43'-6"12'-10"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"9'-6 1/4"9'-5 3/4"4'-11"1'-11"6'-6"5'-5"5'-7"10'-10"8'-0"6'-2"10'-8"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-9"6'-9 1/4"7'-0 3/4"8'-6"7"9"12'-10"49'-2"13'-10"47'-6"12'-10"28'-8"166'-4"9"7"8'-4"9'-0"7'-0"6'-8"6'-8"7'-0"9'-0"8'-4"7"9" 64'-8"103'-9"9"4'-9"8'-1"4'-9"10'-2"10'-4"10'-3"6'-2"6'-7"9'-5"12'-5"8'-0"6'-2"5'-2"90'-2"12'-10"160'-1 1/2" 1'-4"30'-3"30'-3"1'-4" 6'-6 1/2"5'-5"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-1 1/4"10'-9 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"8'-0"11'-0 1/4"5'-9 3/4"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"5'-11"6'-3"1'-11"6'-2"4'-9"6'-1"8'-0"11'-3"9" 11'-11 1/2"12'-10"22'-2"12'-10"37'-2"12'-10"12'-2"12'-10"25'-4"2 3/8"43'-5 7/8"9'-4"34'-0"25'-0"25'-0"27'-2 3/4"9"1'-4"34'-1 1/4"25'-0"34'-0"25'-0"34'-0"25'-0"44'-3 1/4"9" F.E. 1 3 A610 4 A611 Stair A 463 463 463a 1. ALL DIMENSIONS AT EXTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO EXTERIOR FACE OF MASONRY AT CMU WALLS OR CENTER OF STUD AT FRAMED WALLS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS AT INTERIOR WALLS ARE TAKEN TO THE CENTER OF STUD. DIMENSIONS OF FURRING WALLS ARE TO FACE OF WALL. 3. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, INTERIOR WALLS WITHOUT DESIGNATION ARE TYPE I3a. 4. 'FS' AT INTERIOR DIMENSIONS DENOTES DIMENSIONS TO FACE OF STUD WALL, 'CS' TO CENTER OF STUD WALL AND 'FOW' DENOTES FACE OF WALL. 5. SEE SHEETS A010 & A011 FOR EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR WALL TYPES. 6. SEE SHEET A011 FOR FLOOR-CEILING & ROOF-CEILING ASSEMBLIES. 7. CORRIDOR WALLS ARE WALL TYPE C2B, 2X6'S, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 8. UNIT PARTY WALLS TO BE WALL TYPE P1, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. SEE A860 FOR FIRE BLOCKING @ PARTY WALL. SEE A860 FOR UNIT/ CORRIDOR FIRE BLOCKING. 10. SEE A860 FOR GYP. BOARD CONTROL JOINTS. 11. ELECTRICAL APPURTENANCES TO BE MOUNTED FROM 15" - 48" AFF PER MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE SECTION 308. SEE A003. 12. ALL WINDOWS WITHIN 30" OF DOOR SWING SHALL BE TEMPERED. 13. PROVIDE CABINET PULLS @ ALL KITCHENS AND BATHS. 14. SEE SHEET A860 FOR FIRESTOPPING OF HVAC PENETRATIONS OF FLOOR/CEILING & WALL ASSEMBLIES. 15. SEE A500 - A501 FOR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. 16. SEE A820 FOR INTERIOR WINDOW FRAME ELEVATIONS. 17. NOT USED. 18. F.E. @ CORRIDORS SEE A860 FOR FIRE EXTINGUISHER DETAILS. LOCATE F.E. PER FLOOR PLANS. CABINETS MUST BE RATED WHEN PENETRATING RATED WALL ASSEMBLIES. FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES 19. NOT USED. 20. RECESSED FIXTURES IN WOOD FRAME STRUCTURE: SEE A860. 21. SHAFT WALL INTERSECTIONS WITH STANDARD WALLS: SEE A860. 22. AT ALL BEARING STUDS WITH PIPE PENETRATIONS, STRAP PLATES AS REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF WALL. 23. SEE A840 FOR ROOF ACCESS DETAILS. 24. NOT USED. 25. SEE INTERIORS SHEETS FOR INTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FINISHES, SCHEDULES, AND DETAILS. 26. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT N.I.C. 27. WHEN NOT OTHERWISE SHOWN IN AN ELEVATION VIEW, SEE ENLARGED FLOOR PLANS FOR TAGS DENOTING CABINETRY AT KITCHEN ISLANDS. 28. ALL STEEL BEAMS AND COLUMNS SHALL BE FIREPROOFED W/ INTUMESCENT PAINT PER TABLE 601 OF THE 2020 MN BUILDING CODE. 28. PROVIDE RATED ACCESS PANELS AT HOT WATER RECIRC LINE. IF LOCATED IN RATED ASSEMBLY -SEE MECH. 29. CORRIDOR CEILINGS ARE TO BE COVERED WITH GYPSUM SHEATHING PER FLOOR ASSEMBLY. CEILINGS DROPPED FOR MECH. AT CORRIDORS ARE NOTED ON OVERALL BUILDING PLANS. KEEP DROPPED CEILINGS AS TIGHT/HIGH AS POSSIBLE. =TYPE A UNIT LOCATION =PRECAST BEAM LOCATION =A/V COMM. UNIT WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:47:12 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtLevel 4 East Plan 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3418115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Level 4-East City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 64 UP A5013 A501 2 A500 1 A501 1 A501 6 SD_502 1 SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT W/ SPLASH BLOCK RD & ORD RD & ORD ROOF MEMBRANE COMPATIBLE WALKWAY PAD (24" WIDE TYP) PROPOSED ANCHOR SYSTEM INSTALLED FOR WINDOW WASHING (DESIGN-BUILD SYSTEM) SEE STRUCT FOR ANCHORS FIREWALL 4'-0"4'-0" IN ROOF NO PENETRATIONS FIRE RETARDANT SHEATHING REQUIRED WITHIN 4' OF FIREWALL, NO PENETRATIONS ALLOWED IN THIS AREA 1 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A351/1A3511 A622 1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12" 1 /2 " / 1 2 "33'-3 1/4"18'-6"18'-6 1/2"1/2" / 12" 1 /2 " / 1 2 " 1 /2 " / 1 2 "1/2" / 12" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 10'-0" 10'-0" 1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"23'-7"23'-7"34'-0"34'-0" 26'-8"1'-4" PREFABRICATED CANOPY BEYOND A840 6 Typ. 2 A840 14 A623 ROOF PLAN NOTES 1. SEE A011 FOR TYPICAL ROOF/CEILING CONSTRUCTION. 2. SEE A840 & A841 FOR ALL ROOF PENETRATION AND PARAPET DETAILS. 3. FOR RATED MECHANICAL SHAFT PENETRATIONS: SEE A840. 4. PROVIDE ROOF ACCESS HATCHES AS SHOWN ON PLANS - SEE SHEET A350, A351 A620, A621 & A840 5. PROVIDE 30 X30 WALKWAY PADS TO ALL SERVICEABLE EQUIPMENT COMPATIBLE W/ ROOF MFR'S SYSTEM. CONFIRM LAYOUT OF WALKWAY PADS W/ OWNER. 6. FLASH ALL VENT THROUGH ROOF PIPES PER A840 WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:47:15 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtRoof Plan West 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3508115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Roof Plan-West N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 65 A502 3 1 SD_600 A501 4 A5022 3 A611 1 A611 4 A610 A500 2 A502 1 SD_502 1 A501 5 scupper scupper 34'-11 1/4"25'-11"25'-11"CRICKET TRASH AND RECYCLING EXHAUST FRAMING TO EXTEND 3' BEYOND SHEATHING SCUPPER AND DOWNSPOUT W/ SPLASH BLOCK 1/4" / 12"RD & ORD PROPOSED DAVITS INSTALLED FOR WINDOW WASHING (DESIGN-BUILD SYSTEM) SEE STRUCT FOR ANCHORS FIREWALL 4'-0"4'-0" IN ROOF NO PENETRATIONS SOLAR PANELS INSULATED ROOF HATCH, PROVIDE ROOF CRICKET & WALKWAY PADS ON LATCH SIDE & STEP SIDE. PROVIDE WALKWAY PADS TO ROOF TOP EQUIPMENT, TYP. A501 6 1 A600 2 A610 5 A611 6 A611 2 A611 5 A610 MATCHLINEMATCHLINE/1A350/1A3502 A622 1/4" / 12" 1/2" / 12" 1 /2 " / 1 2 " 1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/2" / 12"1/4" / 12"1/4" / 12" 1 /2 " / 1 2 " 1 /2 " / 1 2 "1/2" / 12" 1/2" / 12" 1/2" / 12"1 /2 " / 1 2 "21'-3"21'-3 1/2"1'-4"26'-8"26'-4 1/8"29'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"25'-0"21'-4"21'-4"1/4" / 12"3 / 8 " / 1 2 "3/8" / 12"1/4" / 12"3 / 8 " / 1 2 " 3 A610 4 A611 A840 6 Typ. 2 A840 9 A840 Typ. 10 A840 Sim 14 A623 ROOF PLAN NOTES 1. SEE A011 FOR TYPICAL ROOF/CEILING CONSTRUCTION. 2. SEE A840 & A841 FOR ALL ROOF PENETRATION AND PARAPET DETAILS. 3. FOR RATED MECHANICAL SHAFT PENETRATIONS: SEE A840. 4. PROVIDE ROOF ACCESS HATCHES AS SHOWN ON PLANS - SEE SHEET A350, A351 A620, A621 & A840 5. PROVIDE 30 X30 WALKWAY PADS TO ALL SERVICEABLE EQUIPMENT COMPATIBLE W/ ROOF MFR'S SYSTEM. CONFIRM LAYOUT OF WALKWAY PADS W/ OWNER. 6. FLASH ALL VENT THROUGH ROOF PIPES PER A840 WEST EAST KEY PLAN NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects As indicated6/8/2021 11:47:20 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtRoof Plan East 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA3518115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 55116Rev. No.RevisionDate1/8" = 1'-0"1 Roof Plan-East N City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 66 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 4.2 7.25.2 4.3 4.1 FIREWALL FIRE RETARDANT SHEATHING REQUIRED WITHIN 4' OF FIREWALL, NO PENETRATIONS ALLOWED IN THIS AREA 1 A610 4.523.14.3 7.2 4.47.1 4.6 723 SF OF WALL SPACE 359 SF GLASS 32 SF SPANDREL GLASS 359+32 = 391 SF 391 / 723 = 54% GLAZING 019b 018b 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 1 A611 4.24.54.45.2 5.1 4.34.44.14.1 2 1 1 1 1 921'-8" AVG GRADE PLANE53'-8 3/4" AVG BUILDING HEIGHTFIREWALL FIRE RETARDANT SHEATHING REQUIRED WITHIN 4' OF FIREWALL, NO PENETRATIONS ALLOWED IN THIS AREA 1 A600 2 A610 2 A611 3 A610 4 A611 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects 1/8" = 1'-0"6/8/2021 11:48:09 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtExterior Elevations 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA5008115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 551161/8" = 1'-0"1 CD South Elevation - West Half 1/8" = 1'-0"2 CD South Elevation - East Half EXTERIOR MATERIALS Material Mark Description Image 4.1 CMU - ABOVE GRADE - ROCKFACE 4.2 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND 4.4 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND 4.6 LIMESTONE SILL 5.1 7.1 CFB -4/7/4 ALTERNATING WIDTH LAP SIDING 7.2 CFB -4/7/4 ALTERNATING WIDTH LAP SIDING 7.3 23.1 Exterior Materials by Elevation Code Description Manufacturer Color Area % East Class I 4.2 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Sioux City Brick Vintage Black Smooth 6,796 ft² 52% 4.4 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Cloud Ceramics Light Ivory 27 ft² 0% 8.1 GLAZING 2,617 ft² 20% 9,440 ft² 73% Class II 4.1 CMU - ABOVE GRADE - ROCKFACE County Materials Blackened Ash 2,223 ft² 17% 7.1 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 1: TBD 0 ft² 0% 7.2 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 2: TBD 1,282 ft² 10% 3,505 ft² 27% 12,945 ft² 100% North Class I 4.2 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Sioux City Brick Vintage Black Smooth 3,409 ft² 14% 4.4 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Cloud Ceramics Light Ivory 4,570 ft² 19% 8.1 GLAZING 5,917 ft² 25% 13,896 ft² 59% Class II 4.1 CMU - ABOVE GRADE - ROCKFACE County Materials Blackened Ash 3,014 ft² 13% 7.1 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 1: TBD 5,110 ft² 22% 7.2 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 2: TBD 1,503 ft² 6% 9,627 ft² 41% 23,523 ft² 100% South Class I 4.2 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Sioux City Brick Vintage Black Smooth 4,559 ft² 20% 4.4 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Cloud Ceramics Light Ivory 3,622 ft² 16% 8.1 GLAZING 4,308 ft² 19% 12,489 ft² 56% Class II 4.1 CMU - ABOVE GRADE - ROCKFACE County Materials Blackened Ash 4,637 ft² 21% 7.1 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 1: TBD 4,141 ft² 19% 7.2 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 2: TBD 1,068 ft² 5% 9,846 ft² 44% 22,335 ft² 100% West Class I 4.2 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Sioux City Brick Vintage Black Smooth 6,447 ft² 53% 4.4 BRICK - UTILITY - RUNNING BOND Cloud Ceramics Light Ivory 179 ft² 1% 8.1 GLAZING 2,576 ft² 21% 9,202 ft² 75% Class II 4.1 CMU - ABOVE GRADE - ROCKFACE County Materials Blackened Ash 1,728 ft² 14% 7.1 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 1: TBD 0 ft² 0% 7.2 CFB - LAP SIDING ALTERNATING WIDTH 4"/4"/7" EXPOSURE James Hardie Color 2: TBD 1,331 ft² 11% 3,059 ft² 25% 12,261 ft² 100%Rev. No.RevisionDateCity council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 67 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 5.24.2 4.1 4.3 4.3 7.2 3 3 3 3 656546921'-8" AVG GRADE PLANE53'-8 3/4" AVG BUILDING HEIGHT2 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 111 1 1 1 020b064b024b 2 1 1 2 2 212 2 2 1 2 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 4.2 5.2 7.2 4.3 4.1 4.3 921'-4" AVG GRADE PLANE53'-8 3/4" AVG BUILDING HEIGHT028b 668 SF OF WALL SPACE 300 SF GLASS 38 SF SPANDREL GLASS 300+38 = 338 SF 338 / 668 = 50% GLAZING 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 4.3 4.1 5.24.34.27.2 5 5 6 53'-8 3/4" AVG BUILDING HEIGHT921'-8" AVG GRADE PLANE 1 1 3 2 2311 1 1 3 2 2311 022b Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 1 A611 A501 4 4.4 5.2 4.6 4.17.1 4.4 2 1 1 1 1 1 921'-8" AVG GRADE PLANE FIREWALL FIRE RETARDANT SHEATHING REQUIRED WITHIN 4' OF FIREWALL, NO PENETRATIONS ALLOWED IN THIS AREA 1 A600 2 A611 4.5 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 015a 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 4 A611 Level 1 100'-0" Level P 88'-8" 6 4 6 6 4.5 5.2?4.5 5.1 66 001a009a Level 1 100'-0" Level P 88'-8" 4.4 4.5 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects 1/8" = 1'-0"6/8/2021 11:48:22 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtExterior Elevations 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA5018115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 551161/8" = 1'-0"1 CD West Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"2 North Elevation - West 1/8" = 1'-0"3 Inside Elevation - West Wing 1/8" = 1'-0"6 North Elevation - Middle 1/8" = 1'-0"4 Entry Lobby Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"5 Elevation - Side of Lobby Rev. No.RevisionDateCity council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 68 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 4 A6104.2 7.2 4.35.2 4.3 4.1 921'-8" AVG GRADE PLANE53'-8 3/4" AVG BUILDING HEIGHT5 A610 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 12 2 1 1 1 2 2 013c 013b 23.1 2 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 4.2 7.25.2 4.3 4.3 4.1 921'-8" AVG GRADE PLANE53'-8 3/4" AVG BUILDING HEIGHT23.1 2 1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 211 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 3 2 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level P 88'-8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 7.2 921'-8" AVG GRADE PLANE 4.2 4.3 5.2 23.14.1 1 1 1 2 11 1 2 1 1 1211 F.E. 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 21 NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects 1/8" = 1'-0"6/8/2021 11:48:28 AMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtExterior Elevations 06-02-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA5028115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 551161/8" = 1'-0"1 North Elevation - East 1/8" = 1'-0"2 CD East Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0"3 Inside Elevation - East Wing Rev. No.RevisionDateCity council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 69 Proposed Apartments Proposed Apartments 0% Shaded Proposed Apartments Proposed Apartments 0% Shaded Proposed Apartments Proposed Apartments 10% Shaded Proposed Apartments Proposed Apartments >50% Shaded Nov 21-Jan 21 after 2:30pm Proposed Apartments 35% Shaded 48' min Proposed Apartments Proposed Apartments 0% Shaded 48' min Proposed Apartments Proposed Apartments 5% Shaded 48' min Proposed Apartments Proposed Apartments 20% Shaded 48' min Proposed Apartments NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONDate Project Number 1301 American Blvd E. Suite 100 Bloomington, MN 55425 tel: (612) 879-6000 fax: (612) 879-6666 www.kaaswilson.com Copyright Kaas Wilson ArchitectsOwner:Project:kaas wilson architects 1" = 100'-0"5/27/2021 2:05:08 PMC:\Revit Local\20003-CB-St.Louis Park-8115 HWY N 7 - mixed use v3_ryand@kaaswilson.com.rvtShadow Study 05-28-2021 20003Rise on 7CB SLP LPA1218115 MN-7St Louis Park, MN 55426MEP Engineer: Cain Thomas Associates Inc 4215 White Bear Pkwy #100 St Paul, MN 55110 Structural Engineer: Sandman Structural Engineers 10125 Crosstown Circle #380 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Civil Engineer: Loucks 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 1080 Montreal Ave.St Paul, MN 551161" = 100'-0"1 Shadow Study 3-20 9am 1" = 100'-0"2 Shadow Study 3-20 3pm 1" = 100'-0"3 Shadow Study 6-21 9am 1" = 100'-0"4 Shadow Study 6-21 3pm 1" = 100'-0"5 Shadow Study 9-22 9am 1" = 100'-0"6 Shadow Study 9-22 3pm 1" = 100'-0"7 Shadow Study 12-21 9am 1" = 100'-0"8 Shadow Study 12-21 3pm 1" = 100'-0"9 Shadow Study 3-20 11am 1" = 100'-0"10 Shadow Study 3-20 1pm 1" = 100'-0"11 Shadow Study 6-21 11am 1" = 100'-0"12 Shadow Study 6-21 1pm 1" = 100'-0"13 Shadow Study 9-22 11am 1" = 100'-0"14 Shadow Study 9-22 255pm 1" = 100'-0"15 Shadow Study 12-21 11am 1" = 100'-0"16 Shadow Study 12-21 1pm Rev. No.RevisionDateCity council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8d) Title: Rise on 7 development project Page 70 Meeting: City council Meeting date: June 21, 2021 Action agenda item: 8e Executive summary Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Recommended action: Motion to approve the first reading of Ordinance amending chapter 36 pertaining to the animal handling uses and set second reading for July 6, 2021. Policy consideration: Does the council wish to amend the zoning ordinance to create a limited animal handling land use category. Summary: John Kohler, representing Paster Properties who own the Texa-Tonka mall, requests an amendment to the zoning code to create a land use category called “limited animal handling” and to allow it as a permitted use at the Texa-Tonka mall, which is zoned the MX-1 Mixed use district. Background: The city currently has one land use category that addresses the care of animals called “animal handling.” It includes uses such as pet stores, pet clinics, grooming facilities, boarding, and animal daycares. The city’s experience with these uses that include boarding, animal daycares, or commercial outdoor play areas is that they are likely to create nuisance odor and noise. As a result, the city only allows animal handling in the C-1 neighborhood commercial, C-2 general commercial, MX-2 neighborhood mixed-use and IG general industrial districts and only with the condition that uses that include boarding must be at least 100 feet from a residential property. The intent of this amendment is to create a second animal handling land use category called “limited animal handling” to allow pet stores, veterinary clinics and grooming facilities that are less likely to create nuisances for adjacent properties. The proposed limited animal handling land use category will allow these uses without requiring a minimum separation from residential and allows them to operate in more areas of the city. The proposed category excludes uses having animal boarding, animal daycares. If approved, the applicant could lease space in Texa-Tonka shopping center to a proposed dog grooming facility per the revised zoning code. The planning commission conducted a public hearing on June 2, 2021. No comments were received from the public, and the planning commission recommended approval. Financial or budget considerations: None. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Letter from applicant Ordinance Prepared by: Gary Morrison, assistant zoning administrator Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 2 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Discussion Proposed ordinance: The proposed ordinance submitted by the applicant was written to allow the new limited animal handling land use category in the MX-1 vertical mixed-use district only. Staff proposes allowing the use in more districts than the applicant requested, as described below. The existing definition of animal handling is as follows: Animal handling means the sale, boarding, treatment and care of privately-owned small animal pets which may include dogs, cats, other mammals, fish and reptiles but excludes large animals such as horses, farm animals or animals raised for slaughter. Characteristics may include special refuse, storage, noise, odor and other nuisance characteristics. The proposed definition of limited animal handling is as follows: Animal handling, limited, means any animal handling use such as veterinary clinics, pet stores, and pet grooming that do not include boarding, daycare or outdoor off leash recreation space for animals. The use may require an animal to be kept on-site for treatment but does not include boarding or animal daycares. Both descriptions would remain in the code. Limited animal handling would be a subset of the broader animal handling category. The table below lists where animal handling is currently allowed, and where limited animal handling is proposed to be allowed. The term “permitted” means it is allowed administratively. The term “permitted with conditions” means it is allowed administratively if it meets the conditions specific to that use. For example, it is a condition of animal handling that boarding facilities be at least 100 feet from residential properties. Zoning district Animal handling (current ordinance) Limited Animal handling (proposed ordinance) C-1 neighborhood commercial Permitted with conditions C-2 general commercial Permitted with conditions BP business park Permitted with conditions IG general industrial Permitted with conditions MX-1 vertical mixed use • Permitted if it is less than 8,000 sf. • Permitted with conditions if it’s over 8,000 sf. MX-2 neighborhood mixed use Permitted with conditions PUD planned unit development Permitted in PUDs where retail uses are currently permitted In addition to creating the animal handling limited land use category, the ordinance proposes minor changes to the existing conditions for animal handling. The proposed changes are not substantiative; staff’s intent is to make the conditions consistent in each district where the use is allowed. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 3 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Letter from applicant Section of Ordinance to be amended: Sec. 36-142. Definitions. Table 36-263(b) Mixed Use District Uses Zoning District affected by proposed amendment (if any): The MX-1 District would be affected by this text amendment change. Proposed text amendment: Sec. 36-142. Definitions. ADD: Animal Handling Limited, means any animal handling use such as Veterinary Clinics and Pet Grooming that do not include Boarding, Day Care or Outdoor off leash recreation space for animals. Table 36-263(b) Mixed Use District Uses Under Commercial Uses add: Animal Handling Limited – Primary Street Frontage (P); Secondary Street Frontage (P) What changed or changing conditions make the passage of this amendment necessary? Animal Handling Limited, as defined above, is a service that is common to many retail and mixed-use properties and certainly those similar to the Texa Tonka Center. Services such as Veterinary Clinics and Pet Grooming are becoming very common in the ever-changing world of retail and commercial uses. These are common local neighborhood uses that fit very well into a mixed use or neighborhood center. What is the expected effect of the proposed amendment? The proposed amendment would allow the specific limited services of a Veterinary Clinic and Pet Grooming Service to operate in the MX-1 District. These are each common neighborhood uses well suited for a neighborhood business area such as those found in the MX-1 District. Both of these uses are frequented by the residents of a typical MX-1 District as well as the surrounding residential neighborhoods. What error, if any, in the existing ordinance would be corrected by the proposed amendment? “Animal Handling” as defined in section 36-142 is not allowed in the MX-1 District. The definition of Animal Handling is an all-encompassing definition that combines any animal use into one definition. The existing ordinance would be corrected by adding an additional definition of “Animal Handling Limited” to differentiate those uses that are exclusively indoor quiet business hour uses from those that are all encompassing including 24-hour animal boarding and Dog Day Care businesses. What other circumstances justify this amendment? The Texa Tonka center was rezoned from a commercial zoning to the MX-1 zoning by the city. This rezoning eliminated the previously allowable uses of veterinary clinics and pet grooming City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 4 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses businesses. Texa Tonka is a unique property within the MX-1 district in that it is not a multi- story mixed use property but rather a newly renovated single-story retail commercial building serving the entire residential area around the intersection of Texas and Minnetonka Boulevard. This neighborhood center is filling up with new uses such as Revival, Angel Food Bakery and Frio Frio, Roots Chiropractic, Brito Burritos, and long-time tenants such as Erik’s Bikes. Veterinary Clinics and Pet Grooming are neighborhood services that fit in very well within a good mix of uses. Residents of the neighborhood could drop their dogs off at a Veterinary Clinic or groomer and walk a few doors down to Angel Food and enjoy a coffee and pastry on the patio while waiting for their appointment to be completed. A classic example of a good mixed-use property. A good example of this is Bubbly Paws located on the first floor of Excelsior and Grand. This use fits in well with the retail, service, and restaurant uses at street level along with the multiple levels of residences located above the space, all in an MX-1 district. Bubbly Paws is an excellent example of a use that would be allowed under an “Animal Handling Limited” definition within the MX-1 Zoning District. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 5 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Draft ordinance Ordinance No. ___-21 Ordinance regarding animal handling The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Whereas, the planning commission conducted a public hearing on June 2, 2021 on the ordinance, and Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (case no. 21-23-ZA), and Now, therefore be it resolved that the following amendments shall be made to the City Code: Section 1. Land Use Descriptions and Characteristics. Chapter 36, Section 36-142(d) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text (renumber accordingly): (2) Animal handling, limited means any animal handling use such as veterinary clinics, pet stores, and pet grooming that do not include boarding, daycare or outdoor off leash recreation space for animals. The use may require an animal to be kept overnight on-site for treatment but does not include boarding or animal daycares. Section 2. C-1 neighborhood commercial district. Chapter 36, Section 36-193(c)(5) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and to delete the following struck-out text: (5) Animal handling. The conditions are as follows: a. No animals or pens shall be kept outside the building or cause offensive odor or noise discernible at the property line of the lot on which the activity is conducted. b. Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night and shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, and the facility shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community centers. Section 3. C-2 general commercial district. Chapter 36, Section 36-194(c)(7) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and delete the following struck-out text: (7) Animal handling. The conditions are as follows: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 6 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses a. No animals shall be kept outside the building, or be otherwise located, which cause offensive odor or noise discernible at the property line of the lot on which the activity is conducted. b. Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night and shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, additionally the facility shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community centers. Section 4. BP business park district. Chapter 36, Section 36-233(c)(9) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (9) Restaurants, retail, limited animal handling or service. The conditions are as follows: a. The uses may not exceed 25% of the gross floor area of a single-story building or 50% of the ground floor area in a multi-story building. b. The uses must be so located as to be visible and easily accessible to pedestrians from the public right-of-way. Section 5. I-G general industrial district. Chapter 36, Section 36-244(c)(5) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and delete the following struck-out text: (5) Animal handling. The conditions are as follows: a. No animals shall be kept outside the building or cause offensive odor or noise discernible at the property line of the lot on which the activity is conducted. (b) Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night and shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, additionally the facility shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is zoned residential and used or subdivided for residential use, or has an occupied institutional building, including but not limited to schools, religious institutions, and community centers. Section 6. MX-1 vertical mixed use district. Chapter 36, Section 36-264 Table 36-263(b) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 7 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Table 36-263(b) Mixed Use District Uses Primary Street Frontage Secondary Street Frontage RESIDENTIAL AND LODGING USES Multifamily residential PC PC Live-work unit PC PC Roominghouse PL PL State-licensed residential facility PL PL Group home/non-statutory PL PL Nursing home PL PL Hotel/motel PC PC CIVIC AND INSTITUTIONAL USES Education/academic PL P Museum/library category P P Police/fire station PC PC COMMERCIAL USES Animal handling, limited, less than 8,000 square feet P P Animal handling, limited, 8,000 square feet or larger PC PC Brewery, Micro-distillery PC PC Business/trade school/college PL P Dental office, Medical office P P Food service P P Grocery store PC PC Liquor store CUP CUP Medical office P P Micro-distillery PC PC Offices PL P Private entertainment (indoor) CUP CUP Research and development PL P Retail, Service - less than 8,000 square feet P P Retail, Service - 8,000 square feet or larger PC PC Retail, large item PC PC Restaurants with or without intoxicating liquor license P P Service facilities, less than 8,000 square feet P P Service facilities, 8,000 square feet or larger PC PC Studios PC PC INDUSTRIAL USES Catering PC PC Printing process/supply PC PC Showrooms PC PC TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE USES Communication antennas CUP CUP Transit stations P P City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 8 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Section 7. MX-1 vertical mixed use district. Chapter 36, Section 36-264(d) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (12) Animal handling, limited, 8,000 square feet or larger. a. The customer service space shall be located at a corner of the building or near a primary building entrance. b. The animal handling limited space shall not occupy more than 25 percent of the gross floor area of the ground floor. Section 8. MX-2 neighborhood mixed use district. Chapter 36, Section 36-265(d) of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text and delete the following struck-out text: (2) Animal handling. a. No animals or pens shall be kept outside the building or cause offensive odor or noise discernible at the property line of the lot on which the activity is conducted. b. Where animals are boardedBoarding animals during the day and/or night shall not be permitted in a multi-story mixed-use building, additionally the facility shall be located a minimum of 100 feet from any parcel that is zoned residential and used for residential. Section 9. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-1 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (b) Permitted uses. Zone A (2) Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to the following: office, medical or dental office, adult day care, group day care/nursery school, group home/nonstatutory, banks without drive-up facilities, food service, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, animal handling limited, showrooms and studios. a. All parking requirements must be met for each use. b. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. c. No drive up facilities are allowed. Section 10. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-2 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (c) Uses permitted with conditions. A structure of land in the PUD 2 district may be used for one or more of the following uses if it complies with the conditions specified for the use in this subsection: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 9 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses (1) Commercial uses. Commercial uses limited to the following: bank, food service, grocery store, large item retail, liquor store, medical or dental office, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail, service, showroom, limited animal handling and studio. These commercial uses shall meet the following conditions: a. Commercial uses are limited to the first floor. b. Hours of operation, including loading/unloading of deliveries, for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. c. In-vehicle sales or service is prohibited. d. Restaurants are prohibited. e. Outdoor storage is prohibited. Section 11. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-7 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (b) Permitted uses. (2) Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to the following: medical office, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms, limited animal handling and studios. a. All parking requirements shall be met for each use. b. Hours of operation for commercial uses shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. including commercial deliveries. c. Each commercial tenant space on the first floor shall have a direct and primary access to the outside of the building on the north building elevation that is open during business hours. d. In vehicle sales is prohibited. e. Restaurants are prohibited. Section 12. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-8 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (b) Permitted with conditions. (2) Commercial uses. Commercial uses are only permitted on the first floor, and are limited to coffee shops, office, private entertainment (indoor), retail shops, service, showrooms, limited animal handling and studios. The conditions are as follows: a. All parking requirements must be met for each use. b. Hours of operation shall be limited to 6 a.m. to 12 a.m. c. Restaurants are prohibited. d. In vehicle sales is prohibited. Section 13. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-10 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 10 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses (b) Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses in PUD 10: (1) Shopping Center. The shopping center shall be limited to the following uses: a. Office. b. Medical of dental office. c. Adult day care. d. Group day care/nursery school. e. Bank. f. Food service. g. Private entertainment (indoor). h. Retail. i. Liquor store. j. Service. k. Showroom. l. Studios. m. Restaurants with or without intoxicating liquor. n. Museum. o. Police service substation. p. Post office. q. Animal handling, limited. Section 14. Chapter 36, Section 36-268-PUD-12 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended to add the following underlined text: (b) Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted uses: 1. Medical and dental office 2. Funeral homes 3. Libraries 4. Museums 5. Office 6. Parks and open spaces 7. Police and fire stations 8. Banks 9. Business/trade school/college 10. Retail shops up to 20,000 square feet 11. Service 12. Studios 13. Public service structures 14. Food service 15. Restaurants with or without intoxicating liquor 16. More than one principal building located on a single lot 17. Animal handling, limited. Section 15. This ordinance shall take effect June 11, 2021. City council meeting of June 21, 2021 (Item No. 8e) Page 11 Title: First reading of ordinance pertaining to animal handling uses Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council July 6, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First Reading June 21, 2021 Second Reading July 6, 2021 Date of Publication July 15, 2021 Date Ordinance takes effect July 30, 2021