HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021/03/01 - ADMIN - Minutes - City Council - Regular Official minutes
City council meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
March 1, 2021
1. Call to order
Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m.
1a. Pledge of allegiance
1b. Roll call
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris,
Larry Kraft, and Margaret Rog
Councilmembers absent: Nadia Mohamed
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Assistant Zoning
Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano)
Guests: Chris Culp, Excelsior Group
2. Presentations
2a. Colorectal cancer awareness month – March 2021
Mayor Spano read the Colorectal Cancer awareness month proclamation for March
2021.
2b. Recognition of donations
Mayor Spano noted the following donations and thanked donors on behalf of the
council:
A $300 donation from Jody Winger for the purchase of a tree to be placed in Wolfe
Park in honor of Bill Rosenfeld.
A $100 donation to the fire department from Bryan and Ronna Bartness for fire
prevention programs and equipment.
3. Approval of minutes
3a. City council meeting minutes of Jan. 19, 2021
Councilmember Brausen noted on page 7 the street name is spelled “Burd Place”.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen seconded by Councilmember Rog to approve
the Jan. 19, 2021 city council meeting minutes as amended.
The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Mohamed absent).
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39D8DBC7-1D7F-42B1-A0C3-1B23821A18A7
City Council Meeting -2- March 1, 2021
3b. Special study session meeting minutes of Jan. 19, 2021
It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
the Jan. 19, 2021 special study session meeting minutes as presented.
The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Mohamed absent).
3c. City council meeting minutes of Feb. 1, 2021
Councilmember Dumalag noted on page 1, 2A it should read “…parking garage” vs.
“parking”.
Councilmember Kraft noted on page 2, 8th paragraph down it should read, “… don’t
know how long, don’t know how much, don’t know when we can tell you how long or
how much. He also stated he wanted to know at least a date for when we will know
information.”
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to approve
the Feb. 1, 2021 city council meeting minutes as amended.
The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Mohamed absent).
4. Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar
4a. Accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of January 23, through
February 19, 2021.
4b. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2607-21 amending Chapter 36
pertaining to zoning and approve summary ordinance for publication.
4c. Designate Standard Sidewalk, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder, and authorize
execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $188,266.75 for concrete
replacement – Project No. 4021-0003.
4d. Designate G.L. Contracting, Inc. the lowest responsible bidder and authorize
execution of a contract with the firm in the amount of $526,407.10 for the Alley
Reconstruction Project No. 4020-1500.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 21-024 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the
amount of $34,121.60 for Project No. 4018-1050, which is the Historic Walker Lake
Phase 1 improvement project with Minger Construction Inc., Contract No. 96-19.
4f. Adopt Resolution No. 21-025 approving acceptance of a $300 donation from
Jody Winger for the purchase of a tree to be placed in Wolfe Park in honor of Bill
Rosenfeld.
4g. Adopt Resolution No. 21-026 accepting donation to the fire department from
Bryan and Ronna Bartness for fire prevention programs and equipment.
4h. Adopt Resolution No. 21-027 in support of application for MnDOT Local Road
Improvement program funding for the Louisiana Avenue/Cedar Lake Road
improvement project no. 4023-1101.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39D8DBC7-1D7F-42B1-A0C3-1B23821A18A7
City Council Meeting -3- March 1, 2021
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Dumalag, to
approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive
reading of all resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 6-0. (Councilmember Mohamed absent).
5. Boards and commissions - none
6. Public hearings
6a. Excelsior Blvd., LLC dba Hazelwood Food and Drink – St. Louis Park
Ms. Solano presented the staff report.
Mayor Spano opened the public hearing. No speakers were present. Mayor Spano
closed the public hearing.
Councilmember Harris asked if this is in the Bremer Bank building. Ms. Solano stated it is
in the Bridgewater Bank Building.
Councilmember Harris asked if this is a locally-owned franchise. Ms. Solano stated the
owners have other restaurants under the Hazelwood name .
It was moved by Councilmember Kraft, seconded by Councilmember Dumalag, to
approve application from Excelsior Blvd., LLC dba Hazelwood Food and Drink – St. Louis
Park for an on-sale intoxicating liquor license for the premises located at 4450 Excelsior
Blvd. unit 120.
The motion passed 6-0 (Councilmember Mohamed absent).
7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – none
8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions, and discussion items
8a. First reading of ordinance pertaining to signs on rooftop screening
Mr. Morrison presented the staff report.
Councilmember Dumalag recused herself from the discussion and vote due to a conflict
of interest, as she is employed at JLL and HDR is a corporate clint of JLL which is entering
a long-term lease agreement with Excelsior Group.
Councilmember Brausen asked the size of the proposed sign of the 10 West office
building. Mr. Morrison stated a 300-square-foot maximum sign is proposed on the
exhibit, but the proposed HDR sign is considerably smaller.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39D8DBC7-1D7F-42B1-A0C3-1B23821A18A7
City Council Meeting -4- March 1, 2021
Councilmember Brausen stated he trusts staff and understands how large of a sign this
will be. He asked if adoption of this ordinance will apply to other buildings as well. Mr.
Morrison stated given the criteria of the building having to be zoned PUD and at least 8
stories and an office building, 10 West is the only building this applies to at this time, so
it is narrowly defined.
Councilmember Brausen asked if the ordinance points out that signs can only advertise
businesses in that property. Mr. Morrison stated yes. Councilmember Brausen stated he
will support this.
Councilmember Rog stated she is hesitating on this. She asked about the language
related to special provisions for political signs, directional signs, and real estate signs
and for clarification. Mr. Morrison stated those signs are permitted with their own set of
conditions and reiterated that the sign can only advertise businesses in that building and
are bound by the square foot limits.
Councilmember Rog asked about rooftop screening. Mr. Morrison stated this usually
surrounds HVAC equipment. He noted the screening on the 10 West building was
intentionally oversized to cover more of the roof to incorporate it into the overall design
of the building. He stated rooftop screening is required by code.
Councilmember Rog asked about buildings that may not have those components on the
roof, and thus no screening, or are within the structure of the building, would the
ordinance still allow for signs on the rooftop. Mr. Morrison stated that’s the advantage
of only allowing it in the PUD districts, the building design would be reviewed and
approved or disapproved by the planning commission and the city council.
Councilmember Rog stated she prefers less large advertising and is not a big fan of this .
Councilmember Harris asked how what’s proposed, signage on screening, is different
than what other buildings have done. Mr. Morrison stated currently these signs are on
the sides of buildings, sometimes covering windows. He noted on 10 West, with the
PUD, the sign is incorporated into the design of the building.
Councilmember Harris asked if there are other businesses in the building. Mr. Morrison
stated yes, and they would be allowed smaller signage on the side of the building .
Councilmember Harris asked if this screen structure design element is more of a high-
end signage. Mr. Morrison stated that’s the intent to have it incorporated into the
design of the building.
Councilmember Harris stated she will support the ordinance.
Councilmember Kraft asked about 8 story versus 7 or 6 story. Mr. Morrison stated staff
looks at the code to be consistent with other similar code provisions and not create
various tier levels. He added 8 stories gets above most residential buildings.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39D8DBC7-1D7F-42B1-A0C3-1B23821A18A7
City Council Meeting -5- March 1, 2021
Councilmember Kraft noted he does not view the PUD process as positive as it requires
so much subjectivity. Mr. Morrison stated that is correct, but the alternative of trying to
draft a general code provision that allows it city wide with specific conditions is a big
task in trying to catch all the unintended consequences. He added the PUD process has
advantages by allowing the planning commission and council some input into the design
of the screening structure and signage. Mr. Morrison stated the PUD helps avoid
variances as well.
Councilmember Kraft added his concern is if we are making an exception for one
property or does this allow for an evolution as to how the city thinks about this. Mr.
Morrison stated the PUD option makes architects and property owners think about how
they can incorporate signage into the design of the building as opposed to treating
signage as an afterthought.
Councilmember Kraft stated he is will support this as it addresses the evolution of the
process.
Mayor Spano asked how many buildings in the city are 8 stories or higher. Mr. Morrison
estimated about four office buildings, but none are zoned PUD.
Mayor Spano stated he does not have a problem with signs like this on high buildings,
adding he understands why the ordinance changed in the 1970s because of aesthetics .
He noted many signs in various cities become iconic. Mayor Spano stated we should not
be so concerned about them and pointed out he lives behind Park Nicollet and their
signage is acceptable and appropriate and he will support this.
Councilmember Brausen stated the illustration in the packet gives reference to the size
of the sign. He asked about the message on the sign proposed. Mr. Culp stated the sign
will be the name of a tenant in the building. He noted “HDR” will be on the sign, the
name and logo of an engineering firm, and they are limited to 60 square feet per the
lease agreement.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to
approve the first reading of Ordinance amending Section 36-362(h) pertaining to signs
on rooftop equipment screening structures and set second reading for March 15, 2021.
The motion passed 5-0 (Councilmember Dumalag abstained, Councilmember Mohamed
absent).
9. Communications
Mr. Harmening reminded the council of the Children First virtual breakfast on Thurs day
March 4, noting that sign up can be done on the website.
10. Adjournment
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39D8DBC7-1D7F-42B1-A0C3-1B23821A18A7
City Council Meeting -6- March 1, 2021
The meeting adjourned at 8:03 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
DocuSign Envelope ID: 39D8DBC7-1D7F-42B1-A0C3-1B23821A18A7