Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2021/02/01 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA FEB. 1, 2021 All meetings of the St. Louis Park City Council will be conducted by telephone or other electronic means starting March 30, 2020, and until further notice. This is in accordance with a local emergency declaration issued by the city council, in response to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and Governor Walz's “Stay Safe MN” executive order 20-056. The chief administrator has determined that in-person council or commission/committee meetings are not feasible at this time due to the pandemic. Special study session at 5:45 p.m. The St. Louis Park City Council will meet by videoconference for a special study session on Feb. 1, at 5:45 p.m. to get an update on federal legislative issues and opportunities. Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports. Members of the public can monitor the meeting by video and audio at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or by calling 1.312.535.8110 and using access code 372 106 61 for audio only. Economic development authority (EDA) at 6:20 p.m.; Regular city council meeting at 6:30 p.m. Following the special study session, some or all members of the St. Louis Park City Council will participate in the Feb. 1 EDA and city council meeting by electronic device or telephone rather than by being personally present at the city council's regular meeting place at 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports. Members of the public can monitor the meeting by video and audio at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17 and HD channel 859). For audio only call +1.312.535.8110 and use acce ss code 372 106 61. Members of the public who want to address the city council during the regular meeting about items on the agenda should call the number noted below next to the corresponding item. Call when the meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. and follow instructions provided. Comments will be taken during each item in the order they are received and must relate to an item on the current city council agenda. • 952.562.2886 – consent agenda items 4a -4j • 952.562.2887 – item 8a – Texa-Tonka Apartments 5:45 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION Discussion item 1. 5:45 p.m. Update on federal legislative issues and opportunities 6:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1. Call to order 2. Roll call 3. Approval of minutes 3a. EDA meeting minutes of Jan. 4, 2021 Meeting of Feb. 1 , 2021 City c ouncil agenda 4. Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar Recommended action:**Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from agenda, or move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 4a. Accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of Dec. 26 through Jan. 22, 2021. 4b . Adopt EDA Resolution approving the proposed Assignment and Assumption of redevelopment contract between Sidal Crossroads Co., LLC and CP4 7201 Walker, LLC. 6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Call to order 1a. Pledge of allegiance 1b. Roll call 2. Presentations 2a. SWLRT construction overview and update 3. Approval of minutes 3a. City council meeting minutes of Dec. 21, 2020 4. Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar Recommended action: **Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda , or move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 4a. Accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of Dec. 26 through Jan. 22, 2021. 4b . Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance imposing a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4c . Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance imposing a franchise fee on Xcel Energy, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. 4d . Adopt Resolution approving the final plans and specifications and authorizing bidding documents for Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street improvement project (4020-1101 and 4021-2000). Authorize an amendment of the professional services contract 144-18 with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. in the amount of $90,000 for the final design of the Monterey Drive -Beltline Blvd -36th Street improvement projects (4020-1101 and 4021-2000). 4e . Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $80,166.03 for project no. 4019-5000 rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Avenue, Contract No. 159-18. 4f . Adopt Resolution approving labor agreement between the city and the Local 49 employee bargaining group, establishing terms and conditions of employment for one year, from effective Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. 4g . Adopt Resolution approving labor agreement between the city and the police sergeant employee bargaining group, establishing terms and conditions of employment for one year, from Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. Meeting of Feb. 1 , 2021 City c ouncil agenda 4h . A dopt Resolution declaring the official intent of the City of St. Louis Park to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city. 4i . A pprove an estoppel certificate for 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. 4j . A uthorize execution of a professional services contract with Bolton & Menk Inc., in the amount of $229,444 to complete the preliminary plans for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project (4022-6000). 5. Boards and commissions -- None 6. Public hearings -- None 7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – None 8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items 8a. Texa-Tonka Apartments Recommended action: • Motion to adopt Resolution approving the amendments to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map, as well as related figures, tables, and text (requires five affirmative votes); and • Motion to adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for Edith Addition (requires four affirmative votes); and • Motion to approve Second Reading and adopt Ordinance adding Section 36-268-PUD 18 to the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-1 Neighborhood Commercial and R- 3 Two -Family Residential to PUD 18, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication (requires five affirmative votes) 9. Communications – None **NOTE : The consent calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a councilmember or a member of the public, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular city council meetings are carried live on civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for video on demand replays. During the COVID-19 pandemic, agendas will be posted on Fridays on the entrance doors to city hall and on the text display on civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available after noon on Friday on the city’s website. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952-924-2525. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Discussion item : 1 Executive summary Title: Update on federal legislative issues and opportunities Recommended action: The purpose of this discussion is to update the city council on upcoming federal legislative opportunities . Policy consideration: •Is the council in agreement with pursuing upcoming federal opportunities? •What questions doe s the city council have regarding federal legislative issues and priorities? Summary: Emily Tranter, Lead Lobbyist for Policy and Government Affairs with Primacy Strategy Group, will provide an update on upcoming federal legislative items and opportunities for the city. Items of discussion will include : •Federal COVID-19 funding •Federal Stimulus Plan •Opportunities in Housing, Infrastructure, Race Equity & Inclusion and Climate Action Financial or budget considerations: Funding for lobbyists is included in the budget. Strategic priority consideration: •St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all. •St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship. •St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. •St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. •St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Legislative priorities Prepared by: Maria Solano, senior management analyst Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City of St. Louis Park 2020 Legislative Priorities Affordable housing •Production •Establish dedicated revenue or afforable housing •Allow an affordable housing fee on new development •Establish a TOD affordable housing fund and financial resources •Preservation •Establish a rental rehab loan program for small to medium size developments to preserve NOAH multi-family residential rental properties • Establish a dedicated revenue source for Local Housing Trust Funds (LHTF) • Allow pooled TIF to be deposited in LHTF’s for affordable housing • Establish a tax credit contribution fund •Maintain local regulatory authority for fee-for-service building inspections to ensure public safety and verify compliance •Protections • 90-day tenant protection period prohibiting rent increases and non-renewals following the transfer of (NOAH)property ownership • Expand the eligibility for discretionary and mandatory expungements for eviction case court files • Require tenant notice of grounds for eviction before legal action • Advance renter initiatives such as lease fairness and revamp standards on the minimum heat code, equal emergency and non-emergency court fees and repair rules/emergency tenant remedies •Capital investment in the Perspectives bonding request Climate Action •Statewide adoption of similar goals to the St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan •100% renewable energy by 2030 • Carbon neutral by 2040 •Adopt an advanced state energy code and/or allow for local adoption of more efficient building standards •Support the current state building and energy code development process • Support efforts to encourage zero emissions vehicle/low emissions vehicles (ZEV/LEV) • Funding for electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure • Support climate change efforts such as the MN Green New Deal bill Multimodal Transportation • County partnership on: • Reconstruction of Texas Avenue/ Minnetonka Blvd intersection • Funding for reconstruction of CSAH 25 • Establish stable statewide transportation funding • Support stable and growing revenue sources to fund regional transit providers • Regional planning on automated vehicles General • Preserve local control • Oppose the establishment of levy limits • Oppose reductions to local government aid • Advocate that a percentage of tax revenue generated by recreational marijuana (if approved by the legislature) be allocated to cities to cover law enforcement and mental health • Maintain and increase funding for the pathways to policing program • Support a statewide system to track race data for police traffic stops City of St. Louis Park 2020 Legislative Priorities Affordable housing •Production •Establish dedicated revenue or afforable housing •Allow an affordable housing fee on new development •Establish a TOD affordable housing fund and financial resources •Preservation •Establish a rental rehab loan program for small to medium size developments to preserve NOAH multi-family residential rental properties • Establish a dedicated revenue source for Local Housing Trust Funds (LHTF) • Allow pooled TIF to be deposited in LHTF’s for affordable housing • Establish a tax credit contribution fund •Maintain local regulatory authority for fee-for-service building inspections to ensure public safety and verify compliance •Protections • 90-day tenant protection period prohibiting rent increases and non-renewals following the transfer of (NOAH)property ownership • Expand the eligibility for discretionary and mandatory expungements for eviction case court files • Require tenant notice of grounds for eviction before legal action • Advance renter initiatives such as lease fairness and revamp standards on the minimum heat code, equal emergency and non-emergency court fees and repair rules/emergency tenant remedies •Capital investment in the Perspectives bonding request Climate Action •Statewide adoption of similar goals to the St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan •100% renewable energy by 2030 • Carbon neutral by 2040 •Adopt an advanced state energy code and/or allow for local adoption of more efficient building standards •Support the current state building and energy code development process • Support efforts to encourage zero emissions vehicle/low emissions vehicles (ZEV/LEV) • Funding for electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure • Support climate change efforts such as the MN Green New Deal bill Multimodal Transportation • County partnership on: • Reconstruction of Texas Avenue/ Minnetonka Blvd intersection • Funding for reconstruction of CSAH 25 • Establish stable statewide transportation funding • Support stable and growing revenue sources to fund regional transit providers • Regional planning on automated vehicles General • Preserve local control • Oppose the establishment of levy limits • Oppose reductions to local government aid • Advocate that a percentage of tax revenue generated by recreational marijuana (if approved by the legislature) be allocated to cities to cover law enforcement and mental health • Maintain and increase funding for the pathways to policing program • Support a statewide system to track race data for police traffic stops City of St. Louis Park 2021 Legislative Priorities The St. Louis Park city council asks state, county and met-council representatives to advance the city’s top two legislative categories of affordable housing and climate action. Listed below are the city’s legislative priorities for 2021. Affordable housing o Production o Establish dedicated revenue for affordable housing o Allow an affordable housing fee on new development o Establish a TOD affordable housing fund and financial resources o Preservation o *Allow pooled TIF to be deposited in LHTF’s for affordable housing o Establish a rental rehab loan program for small to medium size developments to preserve NOAH multi-family residential rental properties o Establish a dedicated revenue source for Local Housing Trust Funds (LHTF) o Establish a tax credit contribution fund o Maintain local regulatory authority for fee-for-service building inspections to ensure public safety and verify compliance o Protections o 90-day tenant protection period prohibiting rent increases and non- renewals following the transfer of (NOAH) property ownership o Expand the eligibility for discretionary and mandatory expungements for eviction case court files o Require tenant notice of grounds for eviction before legal action o Advance renter initiatives such as lease fairness and revamp standards on the minimum heat code, equal emergency and non-emergency court fees and repair rules/emergency tenant remedies Climate action o *Special assessment tool for energy/sustainability improvements o Statewide adoption of similar goals to the St. Louis Park Climate Action Plan o 100% renewable energy by 2030 o Carbon neutral by 2040 o Adopt an Advanced State Energy Code and/or allow for local adoption of more efficient building standards o Support the current state building and energy code development process o Support efforts to encourage zero emissions vehicle/low emissions vehicles (ZEV/LEV) o Funding for electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure o Support climate change efforts such as the MN Green New Deal bill Multimodal Transportation o County partnership on: o Reconstruction of Texas Avenue/ Minnetonka Blvd intersection o Funding for reconstruction of CSAH 25 o Establish stable statewide transportation funding o Support stable and growing revenue sources to fund regional transit providers o Regional planning on automated vehicles General o Preserve local control o Oppose the establishment of levy limits o Oppose reductions to local government aid o Advocate that a percentage of tax revenue generated by recreational marijuana (if approved by the legislature) be allocated to cities to cover law enforcement and mental health o Maintain and increase funding for the pathways to policing program and create pathways to firefighting program o Support a statewide system to track race data for police traffic stops Special study session meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 1) Title: Update on federal legislative issues and opportunities Page 2 Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Jan. 4, 2021 1. Call to order President Harris called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m. 2. Roll call Commissioners present: President Harris, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, Margaret Rog, and Jake Spano Commissioners absent: None Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas) 3. Approval of minutes 3a. EDA meeting minutes of Dec. 21, 2020 It was moved by Commissioner Spano, seconded by Commissioner Rog, to approve the Dec. 21, 2020 meeting minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4. Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar It was moved by Commissioner Kraft, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve the EDA disbursement claims for the period of Nov. 28 – Dec. 25, 2020. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Reports - none 6. Old business - none 7. New business 7a. Electing 2021 Economic Development Authority officers It was moved by Commissioner Rog, seconded by Commissioner Kraft, to elect Commissioner Brausen as President, Commissioner Rog as Vice-President, and Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: EDA meeting minutes of January 4, 2021 Commissioner Harris as Treasurer to the Economic Development Authority for the 2021 term. The motion passed 7-0. 8. Communications – none 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:30 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Rachel Harris, president Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Recommended action: Motion to accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of Dec. 26 through Jan. 22, 2021. Policy consideration: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with Article V – Administ ration of Finances, of the EDA bylaws? Summary: The finance division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA ’s charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: EDA disbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt , chief financial officer Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:22:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,000.00BAILEY KRISTIAN DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 475.00BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP HOIGAARD 2010A DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 475.00 83.12CENTERPOINT ENERGY MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES HEATING GAS 83.12 1,000.00DONALD HOFFER INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC. DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 1,523.75EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC WOODDALE STATION TIF DIST OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 414.004900 EXC BLVD TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 403.00HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,773.75 299.00FINANCE & COMMERCE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 299.00 5,000.00FRANZEN LAW & POLICY GROUP LLC HRA LEVY G&A LEGAL SERVICES 5,000.00 10,000.00GORHAM AVE LLC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,000.00 3,000.00LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 3,000.00 1,000.00OLEB MEDIA DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Economic Development Authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 2 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:22:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,000.00 3,000.00PRIMACY STRATEGY GROUP LLC.DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 3,000.00 1,000.00REM 5 DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 13,816.52ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB 13,816.52 1,000.00STEVE MADSON DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 1,000.00UPTOWN WOODWORKS DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 480.00URBAN LAND INSTITUTE DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 480.00 Report Totals 48,927.39 Economic Development Authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 3 Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4b Executive summary Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution approving the proposed Assignment and Assumption of redevelopment contract between Sidal Crossroads Co., LLC and CP4 7201 Walker, LLC. Policy consideration: This action is consistent with the terms of the redevelopment contract with the original developer of the project. Summary: The Contract for Private Redevelopment of April 3, 2000 between the EDA, the City, and MSP SLP Apartments, LLC ("Redeveloper") provides that whenever the Redeveloper wishes to convey the redevelopment property located at 7201 Walker Street (“Property”) and assign its obligations under the Contract as well as the TIF Note associated with the Property to a third party, the EDA must review and formally approve the proposed assignment. Under the Contract, the EDA issued a $3,531,853 Tax Increment (TIF) Revenue Note to the Redeveloper, to reimburse it for costs associated with the development of the Louisiana Oaks apartments on the Property. In April 2015, MSP SLP Apartments, LLC sold the 200-unit Louisiana Oaks apartment complex to an affiliate of Sidal Realty (Sidal Crossroads Co., LLC) which assumed the redevelopment contract and TIF Note from MSP SLP Apartments, LLC. Now Sidal Realty wishes to sell the Louisiana Oaks apartments to CP4 7201 Walker, LLC ; an affiliate of FPA Multifamily , which has regional offices in Minneapolis. F PA Multifamily is a $15 billion privately held real estate inve stment company with over 600 buildings and 122,000 housing units across the country. CP4 7201 Walker, LLC wishes to purchase the Property and assume all rights and obligations under the Contract along with the related TIF Note. The remaining balance to be paid under the TIF Note is just over $3 million. The projected final payment is scheduled for February 1, 2023 upon which the contract will terminate . Approval of the Assignment means that the EDA consents to CP4 7201 Walker, LLC ’s assumption of all the obligations and conditions of the current Redevelopment Contract applicable to the Property. Sidal Realty has provided a proposed Assignment and Assumption of redevelopment contract and has requested that the EDA formally approve it. The EDA’s legal counsel has reviewed the proposed Assignment and Assumption and recommends its approval. Financial or budget considerations: Under the proposed Assignment and Assumption agreement, the EDA consents to CP4 7201 Walker, LLC ’s assumption of all the rights and obligations under the redevelopment contract from Sidal Crossroads Co., LLC as well the assignment of the relate d $3.5 million TIF Note. No additional funds are being requested from the EDA for the Assignment and Assumption. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: EDA Resolution Assignment and assumption of redevelopment contract Prepared by: Greg Hunt, economic development coordinator Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager, EDA executive director Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 2 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments EDA Resolution No. 21-____ R esolution approving an assignment and assumption of redevelopment contract between Sidal Crossroads Co., LLC and CP4 7201 Walker, LLC Whereas, the Board of Commissioners (the “Board”) of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) is currently administering its Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Project") pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act"), and previously established its Mill City Tax Increment Financing District (“TIF District”) within the Project; and Whereas, the Authority, the City of St. Louis Park (“City”) and MSP SLP Apartments, LLC (the “Original Redeveloper”) entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of April 3, 2000 (the “Contract”), regarding redevelopment of a portion of the property within the TIF District (the “Property”); and Whereas, the Original Redeveloper conveyed the Property to Sidal Crossroads Co., LLC (the “Assignor”), and in connection with such conveyance, Original Redeveloper assigned its rights and obligations under the Contract, including assignment of the Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2000A, dated November 20, 2000, issued to Original Redeveloper by the Authority (the “Note”), to the Assignor, and the Assignor accepted such rights and obligations, all pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Contract for Private Redevelopment between Original Redeveloper and Assignor (the “Prior Assignment”); and Whereas, Assignor now seeks to convey the Property and to assign its rights and obligations under the Contract and its right to the Note to CP4 7201 Walker, LLC (the “Assignee”), and Assignor and Assignee propose to enter into an Assignment and Assumption of Contract for Private Redevelopment in substantially the form presented to the Authority; and Whereas, pursuant to the Contract, the Assignor must seek approval from the Authority prior to making any assignment of the Contract or Note ; and Whereas, the Board has reviewed the Assignment and finds that the approval and execution of the Authority’s consent thereto are in the best interest of the City and its residents. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority as follows: A.The Assignment, including the consent of the Authority related thereto, as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the consent to the Assignment by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval. Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 3 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments B.The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf of the Authority the consent attached to the Assignment and any other documents requiring execution by the Authority in order to carry out the transaction described in the Assignment. C.Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to carry out the intent of this resolution. Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development Authority February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, executive director Tim Brausen, president Attest Melissa Kennedy, secretary Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 4 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF CONTRACT FOR PRIVATE REDEVELOPMENT (this “Assignment”), made as of this ___ day of February, 2021, by and between SIDAL CROSSROADS CO., LLC, a Minn e sota limited liability company (“Assignor”) located at 7201 Walker Street, Suite 20, St. Louis Park, MN 55426, and CP4 7201 WALKER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”) located at 2082 Michelson Drive, Suite 400, Irvine CA 92612. WITNESSETH: A.Th e St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “Authority ”), the City of St. Louis Park (the “City”), and MSP SLP Apartments, LLC (the “Original Developer”) entered into a Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of April 3, 2000 (the “Co ntract”), pursuant to which the Authority offered certain tax increment financing assistance to the Original Developer as described hereafter. The Contract was f iled in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder on June 21, 2000, as Document No. 7304809 (Abstract), and f iled in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on June 21, 2000, as Document No. 3289611 (Torrens), and re-filed September 14, 2001, as Document No. 7541218 (Abstract), and re-filed October 2, 2001, as Document No. 3439146 (Torrens). B.The defined terms in the Contract shall have the same meaning hereunder. C. The Authority issued its Tax Increment Revenue Note, Series 2000A (the “Note”) to the Original Developer on November 20, 2000, to reimburse the Original Developer for a portion of the Original Developer’s Public Redevelopment Costs through Available Tax Increment under the terms of the Contract. D.Pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption of Contract for Private Redevelopment dated as of April 30 , 2015, the Original Developer assigned to the Assignor the Note and all of its rights and obligations under the Contract. E.Assignor now wishes to convey the Red evelopment Property to Assignee, to assign its rights and obligations under the Contract to Assignee, and to assign the Note to Assignee, and Assignee wishes to purchase the Red evelopment Property and assume such rights and obligations under the Contract and accept the assignment of the Note. F.Pursuant to the Contract, the Assignor may not assign its rights under the Contract and Note without the consent of the Authority. Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 5 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Assignor does hereby grant, transfer, and assign to Assignee all of its rights and interests in , to and under the Contract, and all of its right, title and interest in, to and under the Note. 2. Assignee hereby accepts this Assignment and assumes and agrees to faithfully abide by, perform, and discharge each and every term, covenant, and condition of the Contract and the exhibits thereto applicable to the “Redeveloper,” and to be fully bound by all of the foregoing. Assignee, for value received, further accepts all right, title and interest of Assignor in, to and unde r the Note and does hereby assume and agree to be bound by and to perform all the covenants, agreements and obligations of Assignor in, to and under the Note arising from and after the date of this Assignment. 3. Assignor hereby warrants and represents to Assignee as follows: a. Except as provided pursuant to the Certificate of Completion executed by the Authority on February 2, 2015, recorded May 1, 2015 in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles as Document No. T05252435 and in the office of the Hennepin County Recorder as Document No. A10187371, the Contract has not been modified or amended and is full force and effect as of the date hereof; and b. To Assignor's knowledge, there is no Event of Default in existence under the Contract, nor is there in existence any state of facts or circumstances which, with the giving of notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute an Event of Default under the Contract. 4. Assignor and Assignee agree that this Assignment shall not be amended or changed in any way without prior written approval of the Authority . 5. Assignor and Assignee agree that the Note is currently subject to an Assignment of Contract between the Original Developer and CWCapital LLC dated as of May 20, 2011 (the “Collateral Assignment”), which was subsequently assigned on May 27, 2011 by CWCAPITAL, LLC to Fannie Mae (the “Lender”), and that Lender approved the assignment of the Contract and Note by the Original Developer to the Assignor. 6. Assignor and Assignee agree and acknowledge that pursuant to the Collateral Assignment, the Assignor may not amend, modify, assign, sell, pledge, transfer, mortgage, or otherwise encumber its interests in the Contract or the Note without the written approval of the Lender; provided, however, that Assignor and Assignee further agree that the interests of the Lender in the Contract and Note will terminate upon the conveyance of the Property and the assignment of the Contract and Note by Assignor to Assignee, and that therefore no written approval of this Assignment by the Lender is required. Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 6 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments 7. This Assignment and Assumption shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall further be for the benefit and reliance of the Authority . 8. This Assignment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Minnesota. 9. This Assignment may be executed in counterparts, which counterparts when considered together shall constitute a single, binding, valid and enforceable agreement. [The remainder of this page is intentionally blank.] Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 7 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment and Assumption Agreement as of the date first indicated above. ASSIGNOR: SIDAL CROSSROADS CO., LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company By: _________________________________ Its: __________________________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of February, 2021, by ____________________, the _________________ of SIDAL CROSSROADS CO., LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ______________________________ Notary Public Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 8 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments ASSIGNEE: CP4 7201 WALKER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By: ________________________________ Its: ________________________________ STATE OF ______________ ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ___________ ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this __ day of February, 2021, by __________________, the __________________ of CP4 7201 WALKER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, on behalf of the company. ______________________________ Notary Public This document was drafted by: KENNEDY & GRAVEN, Chartered (MNI) 150 South 5th Street, Suite 700 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402 Telephone: (612) 337-9300 Economic development authority meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b) Page 9 Title: Assignment and Assumption – Louisiana Oaks Apartments The foregoing Assignment and Assumption of Contract for Private Red evelopment is consented to by: ST. LOUIS PARK ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY By________________________________ Its President By________________________________ Its Executive Director STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) SS. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ___ day of February, 2021, by Tim Brausen and Tom Harmening, the President and Executive Director of the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority, a public body corporate and politic and political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, on behalf of the public body. ______________________________ Notary Public Authority Consent to Assignment and Assumption of Contract for Private Redevelopment Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Presentation: 2a Executive summary Title: SWLRT construction overview and update Recommended action: No action necessary at this time. Policy consideration: None at this time. Summary: Staff from the Southwest Project Office (SPO) and the city will provide an overview presentation on the construction status of SWLRT and construction activities in St. Louis Park. Construction activity Construction of SWLRT is underway corridor wide . On January 14, 2021 it was announced that there will be a significant delay in the opening date because of construction complexities in Minneapolis with the tunnel construction in the Kenilworth corridor and the protection barrier along the BNSF route near the Bryn Mawr Station. Please see the attached letter from Metropolitan Council Chair Zelle explaining the reasons for the delay. In St. Louis Park much of the freight rail and trail bridge work was completed in 2020. In 2021 work will be done to construct the LRT bridges: •Construct the SWLRT bridge s over the Minnehaha Creek, Louisiana Avenue, and Highway 100; •Finaliz e the Cedar Lake Trail bridge that spans over Beltline Boulevard and the rail corridor to the south side of the corridor; •Lay down LRT tracks where they cross Wooddale Ave and Beltline Blvd ; •Begin to construct the stations and other facilities near the stations. SPO has been keeping residents and users in the area apprised of construction changes and closures, as well as sending direct mailed notice to property owners along the corridor. Information on SWLRT can be found at: www.swlrt.org Anyone can sign up to receive weekly construction updates on this site. The 24-hour hotline number to call for construction-related issues is 612-373-3933. Financial or budget considerations: There are no financial or budget considerations at this time . The city is contributing to and spending at total of $5.611 million on the project. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Letter from Metropolitan Council Chair Zelle Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, principal planner Jack Sullivan, senior e ngineering project manager Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 2a) Page 2 Title: SWLRT construction overview and update ATTACHMENT Message below sent on behalf of Chair Zelle ON January 14, 2021: G ood Morning SWLRT Corridor Management Committee and TPAC Members, Today, we are sharing a Southwest LRT (SWLRT) project update with you that will impact our project schedule. As we have progressed construction in the corridor these last two years, we have further identified two major and significant elements that are causing the project delay: •First, due to the poor soils we encountered in the Kenilworth corridor during the initial construction of the tunnel, an alternative construction method is needed to complete the tunnel. The construction method we are introducing (secant wall) will stabilize the soils while constructing the LRT tunnel. We are taking this approach out of an abundance of caution to protect the foundations of adjacent buildings. •Second, we are constructing an approximately 1-mile corridor protection barrier for an additional layer of protection between the BNSF freight trains and LRT trains. The corridor protection barrier will be located in the BNSF’s Wayzata Subdivision in Minneapolis from the Bryn Mawr Station to just east of I-94. This protection barrier was added as a requirement of BNSF after final design and civil construction contracting. While this element is not a surprise in this instance, we have now completed analysis and design for the barrier and have a fuller understanding of the challenges of constructing this project element in an active rail corridor. Both of these elements are major projects by themselves. When taken together, they will have a significant impact to the project’s overall schedule due to their scope and complexity. The corridor protection barrier and the secant wall are crucial, critical path elements for which other construction activities along the whole corridor are highly dependent on for completion. O ur project team is working with our construction contractors to adjust the project schedule to account for the secant wall and barrier protection elements. At this time, it is unknown what the delay to the project date is for revenue operations. The current schedule had identified 2023, but what we know now, it is looking like that is no longer a possibility. We meet with our contractors daily to discuss and solve construction issues. These two issues however are very complex and has taken us a few months to determine the constructability of both elements. We continue to work with the contractor to ensure the needs of the project and of our communities are incorporated in the decision-making. In addition, we have retained national experts to help us in this effort to bring a best practice approach to the process. Throughout construction we have communicated construction impacts to residents, businesses and property owners. We will continue to do so about these two impacts. As the corridor protection barrier and secant wall are in Minneapolis, we are holding a town hall today at 6:00PM to discuss this as well as the 2021 construction schedule for City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 2a) Page 3 Title: SWLRT construction overview and update upcoming activities. We will continue to share information through our construction information channels and be available for discussions. We understand how disruptive the project has been to our five communities; the noise, vibration, roadway and trail closures and the inability to give exact dates of construction activities beginning and ending near property owners has been frustrating. We have asked a lot of our communities. Your continued patience and understanding are needed as we adjust the schedule to bring the region this critical transportation investment. Please reserve Wednesday, February 3 f rom 10:00 to 11:30 AM for us to meet as that SWLRT Corridor Management Committee to discuss further; a calendar invite will be coming out shortly. I look forward to our meeting where we can discuss this and other project topics further. In the meantime, please don’t hesitate to connect. Thank you, Charlie Zelle, Chair Met Council Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes City council meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota Dec. 21, 2020 1. Call to order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 1a. Pledge of allegiance 1b. Roll call Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Lynette Dumalag, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), CFO (Ms. Schmitt), Director of Community Development (Ms. Barton), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison), Police Chief Harcey, Lieutenant Jon Parker, City Assessor (Mr. Bultema), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas) Guests: Liz Diaz, Ehlers 2. Presentations 2a. Retirement recognition for Police Lieutenant Jon Parker Police Chief Harcey recognized Lt. Jon Parker for over 29 years of service to the community. Mr. Harmening stated Lt. Parker will sorely missed in the city and thanked him for his years of service. Mayor Spano also thanked Lt. Parker for his many years of service, adding he is well respected in the community and will be missed. Councilmembers Rog and Kraft also thanked Lt. Parker for his service. Lt. Parker reflected on his years of service stating he feels extremely fortunate to have worked in such a well-run city. He added he is incredibly proud of serving in the community with such a wonderful police force and people. He wished the best to city and staff as they navigate the challenges of future. 2b. Recognition of donations City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: City council meeting minutes of December 21, 2020 Mayor Spano thanked the following on behalf of the city council for their donations: • $2,200 donation from Max and Lillian Fallek for purchase of a memorial bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring Max and Lillian Fallek and family • $2,200 donation from Jeffrey Raison and Marilyn Reiter for the purchase of a memorial bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring nature • $2,200 donation from Sheri Salloway Yarosh for the purchase of a memorial bench in Wolfe Park honoring Polly and Louis Salloway and Adam Hauf • $100 donation from Leslie Marcus, • $20 donation from Karen Campbell and a $20 donation from Adrienne Berman for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center 3. Approval of minutes - none 4. Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar 4a. Adopt Resolution No. 20-182 to recognize Jon Parker for his 29 years of service. 4b. Authorize the Solar Sundown pilot cost sharing program for 2021. 4c. Adopt Resolution No. 20-183 accepting work and authorizing final payment in amount of $11,036.67 for street maintenance project (Area 4) with GMH Asphalt Corporation – city contract No. 51-20. 4d. Adopt Resolution No. 20-184 approving acceptance of a $2,200 donation from Max and Lillian Fallek for the purchase of a memorial bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring Max and Lillian Fallek and family, a $2,200 donation from Jeffrey Raison and Marilyn Reiter for the purchase of a memorial bench at Westwood Hills Nature Center honoring nature, a $2,200 donation from Sheri Salloway Yarosh for the purchase of a memorial bench in Wolfe Park honoring Polly and Louis Salloway and Adam Hauf, and a $100 donation from Leslie Marcus, a $20 donation from Karen Campbell and a $20 donation from Adrienne Berman for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center. 4e. Adopt Resolution No. 20-185 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of the sewer service line at 1815 Melrose Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN. P.I.D. 01-117-22-44-0039 4f. Appoint Council Member Lynette Dumalag as representative, and Council Member Margaret Rog as alternate to the SWLRT Community Works Steering Committee. 4g. Adopt Resolution providing preliminary approval for the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds to finance the CB SLP Housing (CommonBond) project. (This item was removed from the consent calendar and considered as regular agenda as item 8d.) 4h. Adopt Resolution No. 20-186 designating polling places for the 2021 election cycle. 4i. Approve for filing planning commission minutes of Nov. 18, 2020. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: City council meeting minutes of December 21, 2020 4j. Nov. 2020 monthly financial report - no action required at this time. Mayor Spano requested that consent calendar item 4g be removed and placed on the regular agenda as item 8d. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Rog, to approve the agenda and items listed on the consent calendar as amended to move consent calendar item 4g to the regular agenda as item 8d; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5. Boards and commissions 5a. Reappointment of representative to Fire Civil Service Commission It was moved by Councilmember Dumalag, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to approve reappointment of William MacMillan to the Fire Civil Service Commission with a term to expire Dec. 31, 2023. The motion passed 7-0. 6. Public hearings - none 7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – none 8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions, and discussion items 8a. 2021 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2021-2030 capital improvement plan (CIP). Resolution No. 20-187, Resolution No. 20-188, Resolution No. 20-189 Ms. Schmitt presented the staff report. She noted the tax levy proposed increase for 2021 is 4.5%. She stated residents may contact herself, Mr. Harmening, or Mr. Bultema for additional information about the 2021 budget, city and HRA property tax levies and the capital improvement plan. Councilmember Harris stated the council has discussed the levy since May 2020 adding several folks have reached out during these difficult times. She stated the levy moving down to 4.5% is a benefit to the community and she acknowledged staff’s efforts working through the process and reimagining the community’s needs. She stated the city will still reinvest in infrastructure, but at a more modest level. Councilmember Brausen stated the budget is the most important endeavor taken up by the city and council each year, and the amount of time staff spends on it is tremendous. He noted while the council starts the process in May, staff begins in March, adding this is a responsible and fair budget which meets the immediate needs of the city and City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: City council meeting minutes of December 21, 2020 infrastructure and starts to address climate action goals for the city as well. He stated more of a burden will fall on apartment buildings versus homes. He stated he preferred a higher rate of increase on the levy to get ahead of costs in the upcoming cycle and assist bigger demands to help the city’s social safety net. He added in this economy some are doing fine, and others are struggling during the pandemic. He noted next year single-family homeowners will have a significant increase as property values are driven up by the free market and houses continue to sell for high prices. However, he stated, this budget for 2021 was well-thought out and he will support it. Councilmember Rog stated over her 3 years on the council she has learned that many in the community are unconcerned with property tax increases, some connect the value they receive to the taxes they pay, and many values include responsive and professional staff. She stated along with great parks and other city facilities, a wide range of programming for residents and commitment to climate action and racial equity, Connect the Park, and more, these residents whose income increases annually along with their taxes; anticipate annual increases and support all city expenditures. She stated as an elected official, she speaks for them. Councilmember Rog added there are also those who are burdened by property taxes especially seniors and others on fixed incomes, low-income renters, and homeowners with lower priced homes including condos and townhomes. She stated as an elected official, she speaks for them also. Councilmember Rog explained since 2017, according to staff, the owner of a median value townhome in St. Louis Park has seen an increase of $230 in the city portion of their property taxes, or 35%, from $660 to $890; since 2017 the owner of a median value condo has seen an increase of $187 or 41%, from $461 to $648 in the city portion of their taxes. She added over the same time period, the owner of a single-family home, median value, has seen about a $250 increase, from $1,037 to $1,284 in the city portion of their taxes, or 24% – keep in mind this is about one-third of a household’s total property tax bill, which also includes county and school district levy. She added Class C apartments, which are the most affordable rental property in the city are her biggest concern because their assessed value is increasing rapidly. Levies will increase also between 2020 and 2021, and residents of median value Class C apartment unit in the city will see a $113 increase in the city portion of their property taxes, from $477 to $590. Councilmember Rog added that utility and franchise fees are a factor too, with hidden tax increases, and she would like to continue to watch this in the future, and change fees so they are tiered to better reflect use and ability to pay. Councilmember Rog stated affordable housing incentive programs help and the city will need to improve these programs and increase participation. She stated she concurs with her colleagues and others who point out that levy increases that disproportionately impact low-income residents are in conflict with the city’s strategic goals to keep housing affordable and support people on fixed incomes who want to stay in their homes. She stated she will continue to scrutinize budgets, try to get an ever-better grip City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: City council meeting minutes of December 21, 2020 on ROI, and as she has in the past, continue to vote against a levy increase that is not in the best interests of residents. Councilmember Rog continued that in 2021 she will support a 4.5% levy increase due to contextual issues, a major one being Hennepin County is not increasing their levy at all, and a 0% increase means cuts in expenditures and likely some programs. She added the property tax bill that people see is roughly one-third city/county/school district and the county tax at 0% mitigates the impact of the city at 4.5%. Councilmember Rog stated many St. Louis Park residents will see a decrease this year in their total tax bill, or a smaller increase than they would if the county were also increasing, making a 4.5% increase in the city portion more palatable overall as the city prepares for another rocky year ahead. She stated the city may also be called on to fill gaps where the county is unable, and she wants the city to be able to do this. Councilmember Rog stated with these important caveats, she will support the tax levy increase of 4.5% for 2021. Councilmember Kraft agreed with Councilmember Rog and appreciated the work of staff to get the final proposed levy down from 6.11% to 4.5%. He stated given the COVID recession, he preferred a 0-3% increase, adding he does object to the guidance council gave to staff. He stated even with small tax increases each year, they still compound over time and over 10 years, $300 in taxes is significant, even while most homeowners will see a decrease this year in taxes due to market value, while apartments will see the largest increases and fastest in Class C buildings. He continued the biggest increases will be on those less able to afford it, and he does encourage renters and landlords to look into the affordable housing incentive program. He stated to be clear, he will ask for tax increases when they are needed; however, he will vote against this tax increase. Councilmember Dumalag stated she has heard many comments from residents that they are very happy to pay for services they expect from the city. She acknowledged this year property taxes are a difficult issue and the decisions made today are also being made for 2022 and 2023. She noted property taxes are cyclical, but this is how the city is funded. She stated she is comfortable with the 4.5% increase and will support it. Councilmember Mohamed stated she generally supports the tax levy and thanked staff for the data they presented and explaining the process. She agreed there is a sense in St. Louis Park that residents are happy with services provided by the city; however, she pointed out we are working to be an inclusive community and just because some can afford to live here, others have a harder time. She challenged the council to think about everyone from homeowners to renters, adding she is proud the council does this. Mayor Spano thanked staff for working to stay on budget and explain to council how the tax will be able to support the budget. He acknowledged there are issues around Class C buildings, and he agreed with Councilmember Dumalag that taxes are cyclical. He stated the challenge is that St. Louis Park is a very desirable destination to live in with vibrant neighborhoods and good schools. He added the downside is many are willing to pay City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: City council meeting minutes of December 21, 2020 more for services and the city must maintain the growth of the community. Mayor Spano noted this is a responsible budget, adding it seems wise and is only a modest increase, which will help continue investment and growth in the city. It was moved by Councilmember Harris, seconded by Councilmember Dumalag, to adopt Resolution No. 20-187 to approve the 2021 budgets and authorizing the 2021 final property tax levy of 4.5%. The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Kraft opposed). It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to adopt Resolution No. 20- 188 to authorize the 2021 final HRA levy. The motion passed 7-0. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to adopt Resolution No. 20-189 to approve the 2021-2030 capital improvement plan. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. First reading of ordinance pertaining to miscellaneous zoning code amendments Mr. Morrison presented the staff report. He noted amendments to this ordinance will: • Make changes to be consistent with current policy • Correct errors • Clarify intent and language Mr. Morrison stated the planning commission recommended approval. Councilmember Rog asked that the city make the code more accessible on the city website with interactive links. Councilmember Brausen pointed out the marijuana dispensers are only preliminary at this point and indicated he will support the amendments. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Mohamed, to approve the first reading of ordinance amending Chapter 36 pertaining to zoning and set second reading for January 4, 2021. The motion passed 7-0. 8c. 2021 non-union employee compensation. Resolution No. 20-190 Ms. Deno presented the staff report. She noted the recommendation is to approve general adjustment of 2% in accordance with the discussions with council on budget and with the compensation plan. This also includes city manager salary. Compensation is City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 7 Title: City council meeting minutes of December 21, 2020 reviewed by a consultant, looking at the public sector market in the plan and also the Midwest market for city manager as Minnesota is subject to salary cap. Councilmember Dumalag asked what other areas of the country are considered peers to St. Louis Park, with comparables. Ms. Deno stated there is a list of cities used by the consultant in the Midwest with similar populations and area as St. Louis Park. Councilmember Kraft supported the compensation increase, stating the city provides many services in St. Louis Park, staff works hard, and this is appropriate compensation. Mayor Spano stated the value of the city manager is significant adding the city and council all rely on him to hire the right people and make sure the council understands the implications of their decisions. He added Mr. Harmening is exceptionally good at his position and the compensation is warranted. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to adopt Resolution No. 20-190 confirming a 2% general increase for non-union employees effective Jan. 1, 2021 and approving the city manager’s salary for 2021. The motion passed 7-0 8d. Preliminary approval for issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds to finance the CB SLP Housing (CommonBond) Project. Resolution No. 20-191 Mayor Spano pointed out the 2021 budget was just passed, and this item relates to the issuance of $21 million in bonds. He asked staff to explain. Ms. Barton noted this item shows the bonds are conduit bonds. She explained the developer proposes to build an all-affordable apartment building and issue bonds through the state, which must go through the city; however, the city is not liable for these bonds. Mayor Spano pointed out the city charges a percentage for allowing this, and that is a bit of revenue generated for the city, approximately $20,000. Councilmember Dumalag asked what the total cost is of the project. Ms. Barton stated at this point the total is not worked out as the developer is still figuring out their financing. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Rog, to adopt Resolution No. 20-191 providing preliminary approval for the issuance of multifamily housing revenue bonds to finance the CB SLP Housing (CommonBond) project. The motion passed 7-0. 9. Communications City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 3a) Page 8 Title: City council meeting minutes of December 21, 2020 Councilmember Brausen thanked staff for their incredible work this year, especially with the unprecedented challenges for our community including the pandemic and racial unrest. He stated staff has performed admirably and well during these challenging circumstances, and it made a challenging 2020 bearable, as well as making it easy for the council to do their jobs. Councilmember Mohamed shared an incident that occurred at her apartment complex related to face masks. She wanted to take this opportunity to ask everyone to please mask up and remind folks to mind their own business as well, as we do not know others’ situations. Mayor Spano thanked Councilmember Mohamed for sharing the incident. He reflected on 2020 and its challenges. He thanked those in the community who are front line workers, and the many residents who work in healthcare within St. Louis Park. He also commented on the murder of George Floyd, a St. Louis Park resident of Ward 2, stating it seems there is more interest, awareness, and action around race in the last 6 months. He thanked residents, neighbors, and businesses who have taken this seriously in dealing with race and race equity, adding that St. Louis Park is a resilient town. He added he appreciates all this council has done as well as past councils and hopes 2021 is a more peaceful and comfortable year for all. 10. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Approval of city disbursements Recommended action: Motion to accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of Dec. 26 through Jan. 22, 2021. Policy consideration: Does the city council desire to approve city disbursements in accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter? Summary: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the city council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the city’s charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: City d isbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,514.50 EARL F ANDERSEN INC INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 2,514.50 315.003M COMPANY FABRICATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 315.00 14,300.83A.C. CARLSON GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 14,300.83 62.97A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 188.90TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 251.87 450.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 24.14ACCORDWATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 24.14 1,846.15ACE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,846.15 783.20ACTION FENCE INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 783.20 5,364.83ADVANCED DESIGN CONTRACTING PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,364.83 4,652.50AEM FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,652.50 2,840.00ALL AMERICAN ARENA PRODUCTS RECREATION OUTDOOR CENTER GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,840.00 560.00ALL CITY ELEVATOR INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 560.00 1,500.00ALLDATAVEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,500.00 1,079.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 2 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,079.00 2,505.80ALLSTREAMIT G & A TELEPHONE 2,505.80 337.86AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 855.44TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,193.30 687.15AMERECT, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 6,058.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 6,745.15 83.00AMERICAN TRAFFIC SAFETY SERVICES ASSOC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 83.00 1,101.00ANCOM COMMUNICATIONS POLICE G & A RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 1,101.00 765.00ANTHONY CONSTRUCTION , INC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 765.00 13,700.00APPARATUSFIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,700.00 3,283.00APPLIED CONCEPTS INC DWI ENFORCEMENT POLICE EQUIPMENT 3,283.00 269.95ARAMARKFIRE OPERATIONS HEALTH & WELLNESS 269.95 603.75ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 603.75 5,985.00ARVIG CONSTRUCTION INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,985.00 956.00ASCO POWER SERVICES, INC.REC CENTER BUILDING REPAIRS 956.00 258.95ASPEN EQUIPMENT CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 3 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 258.95 1,424.85ASPEN MILLS FIRE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS 74.55FIRE OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 1,499.40 133.02AT&T MOBILITY CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 133.02 800.00ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 388.93WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,188.93 208.25ATOMIC RECYCLING FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 208.25 150.00BARKER EMILY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 150.00 1,335.00BARNA, GUZY & STEFFEN LTD HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,335.00 90.00BARNES, PAUL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 90.00 1,336.38BARNUM GATE SERVICES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,336.38 265.00BARTLEY SALES CO PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 265.00 630.00BARTON SAND & GRAVEL CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 630.00 21,618.00BASSETT CREEK WATERSHED MGMT COMMISSIONSTORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,618.00 2,575.00BCD CONSULTING GROUP HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 2,575.00 802.37BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 4 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 802.37 38,717.93BELL STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 15,206.49GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 53,924.42 1,570.00BERGERSON CASWELL INC WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,570.00 16,163.35BERWALD ROOFING COMPANY, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 112,005.72GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 128,169.07 368.00BMIREC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES 368.00 60.00BOESEN EMILY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 60.00 242.08BOLTON & MENK INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 967.85PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 67.64WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3.56SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,600.37STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,881.50 475.00BOND TRUST SERVICES CORP 2019A GO DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 109.002018A GO DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 475.002010A/2019C HIA DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 165.002017A GO DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 475.002016A GO DEBT SERV G&A FISCAL AGENT FEES 48.002010B/2017A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 394.002013A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 193.002017A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 304.002018A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 7.002010B/2017A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 46.002017A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 62.002018A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 16.002010B/2017A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 81.002013A UTIL REV BONDS FISCAL AGENT FEES 2,850.00 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 5 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 64.00BONNELL DANIEL INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 64.00 1,500.00BRAGA JOSEPH ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 685.97BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,484.89PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 392.54WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 130.85SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 567.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 9,261.25 4,455.89BREDEMUS HARDWARE COMPANY INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 4,455.89 235.00BREHM SARAH BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 235.00 20.00BROCKELL RACHELLE INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 20.00 1,410.47BTR OF MINNESOTA LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,410.47 55.00BUDGET SIGN FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.00POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 110.00 42.55BURCH MARY WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 42.55 660.00BUREAU OF CRIMINAL APPREHENSION COMMUNICATIONS/DISPATCH TELEPHONE 660.00 736.93BUSINESS ESSENTIALS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 736.93 200.00BUSTROM NICK WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 200.00 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 6 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 326.16CALUMET BRANDED PRODUCTS FIRE OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 326.16 8,495.54CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 49.50PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 214.50PUBLIC WORKS G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 478.50ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES 699.00SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 517.75STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES 10,454.79 1,980.10CANON FINANCIAL IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,980.10 4,166.00CARE RESOURCE CONNECTION FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 4,166.00 93.10CARLSON MARK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 93.10 8,503.15CARTEGRAPH SYSTEMS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 8,503.15SEWER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 8,503.15SOLID WASTE G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 8,503.15STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 8,503.15TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 42,515.75 58.81CCH INCORPORATED FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 58.81 6,410.59CDW GOVERNMENT INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 6,410.59 2,087.40CE CONTRACT GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,087.40 20.00CENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT TRANSFORMATION LOAN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20.00 2,012.99CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 7 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,125.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,400.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,537.99 10,511.82CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A HEATING GAS 92.82SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 3,156.21REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS 13,760.85 12.75CENTRAL MCGOWAN CONCESSIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 12.75 10,644.56CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT OTHER RETIREMENT 10,644.56 2,096.10CENTRAL ROOFING COMPANY GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,096.10 287.25CENTURY FENCE COMPANY GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 287.25 378.24CENTURY LINK CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 378.24 150.00CHEF MARSHALL O'BRIEN LLC FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 350.00NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 225.00CHRISTOPHER STROM ARCHITECTS MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 748.00CHUXINSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 748.00 226.68CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 113.92PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 45.50REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 203.33VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 589.43 60.06CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 8 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 53.20-ADMINISTRATION G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 216.12ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 228.28ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE 47.21ADMINISTRATION G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 72.40HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 37.27HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 453.95HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 1,099.40COMM & MARKETING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 966.95IT G & A TRAINING 400.00ASSESSING G & A TRAINING 39.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 33.11COMM DEV PLANNING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 650.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 225.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 2,517.68FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 175.08POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES .03-POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 42.99POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 51.98POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 1,136.94POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 26.92POLICE G & A POSTAGE 125.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 129.95POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 949.24FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 365.36FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 376.18FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 584.62FIRE OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 596.67FIRE OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 590.03FIRE OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 464.64FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 2,490.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A TRAINING 34.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 60.00SUSTAINABILITY G&A TRAINING 120.00PUBLIC WORKS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 140.94ENGINEERING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 89.25ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,350.00ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING 772.55PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 680.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 162.54SANDING/SALTING GENERAL SUPPLIES 980.83WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 9 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 229.98WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 692.05WATER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 860.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 119.88TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 45.84ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 283.87ORGANIZED REC G & A ADVERTISING 200.00SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,703.06BASKETBALLGENERAL SUPPLIES 46.53WARMING HOUSES GENERAL SUPPLIES 235.31PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 13.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 95.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A TRAINING 890.83WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.69REC CENTER BUILDING OFFICE SUPPLIES 20.00REC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES 1,131.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 100.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 200.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LICENSES 204.00GENERAL REPAIR TRAINING 26,587.92 71.30CLARKE LISA ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 71.30 30,884.37COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 30,884.37 1,147.14COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,746.08INSTALLATIONOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,893.22 200.84COMCASTFIRE OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 106.50CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 34.13OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 58.94REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.41 32,669.78COMPASS MINERALS AMERICA SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 32,669.78 778.50CONCRETE TREATMENT, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 10 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 778.50 800.00CONNELLY PATRICK ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 800.00 48.00CONTRERAS GIOVANNA INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 48.00 398.45CORE & MAIN LP WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 398.45 54.21COREMARKGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 917.28VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 971.49 941.00CORPORATE MECHANICAL REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 430.00REC CENTER BUILDING REPAIRS 878.48REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,249.48 711.00COSTAR REALTY INFORMATION, INC.ASSESSING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 711.00 511.48CREEKSIDE NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 511.48 13.80CROWN RENTAL - BURNSVILLE TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.80 1,900.00CTW GROUP, INC.ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 486.87WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 2,386.87 875.54CYALUME TECHNOLOGIES, INC.FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 875.54 1,363.36DALCO ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 1,363.36 76.96DANIELSON DEBBIE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 76.96 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 11 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 115.00DEBOER-GETSCH REANNADA BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 115.00 175.00DELEGARD TOOL CO GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 175.00 40.00DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.00 3,187.55DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 3,187.55 5,520.00DOCUSIGNTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 5,520.00 1,468.17DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 692.55COMM DEV PLANNING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 2,160.72 1.00DOYLE JOE BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 66.00 106.66DOYLE MARNETTE INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 106.66 1,050.00DTN, LLC.PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,050.00 402.00EARTH RATED PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 402.00 22,772.44EBERT CONSTRUCTION GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 12,808.20GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 35,580.64 725.90ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES 725.90 6,922.50EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 12 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 6,922.50 3,902.21EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY 3,902.21 5,550.99ENTERPRISE FM TRUST EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT 5,550.99 1,169.28ENVIROTECH SERVICES INC SANDING/SALTING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,169.28 35,864.50EUREKA CONSTRUCTION INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 63,002.58PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINAGE PAYABLE 139,206.01PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,439.67WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,749.49STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250,262.25 825.00EXTERIOR BUILDING SERVICES, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 825.00 81.93FABER BRENDA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 81.93 583.23FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 18.99GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 602.22 11.72FASTENAL COMPANY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 59.95INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 28.50GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 100.17 195.54FECHO KEVIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 195.54 146.31FENECH MARK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 146.31 4,761.32FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 4,761.32 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 13 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 60.00FERRELLGASGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 337.04REC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 397.04 295.00FIELD TRAINING SOLUTIONS POLICE G & A TRAINING 295.00 293.01FINANCE & COMMERCE, INC.SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 293.01 53.95FIRE SAFETY USA INC FIRE OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 53.95 5,190.00FIRST IMPRESSION GROUP ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 5,190.00 96.53FISHMAN STEWART REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 96.53 61.94FLECK, JAMIE WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 61.94 2,654.85FOCAL POINT FIXTURES, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 141,006.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 143,660.85 900.70FORCE AMERICA DISTRIBUTING LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 900.70 16,110.00FOUNDATION SERVICE CORP GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 16,110.00 59.35FRANCOUAL JOANNE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 59.35 19.80FRANK LEE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 19.80 103.44FURST ROBERT WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 103.44 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 14 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 9,202.66GALLS, LLC - DBA UNIFORMS UNLIMITED POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 3,588.00POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 12,790.66 767.35GAREIS CHRIS BLDG & ENERGY G & A TRAINING 73.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A LICENSES 840.35 2,440.00GELLERMAN CONSTRUCTION INC REC CENTER BUILDING MAINTENANCE 2,440.00 48,781.00GENERAL SHEET METAL COMPANY, LLC. GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,500.00-GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 46,281.00 325.00GERTEN STEVE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 325.00 1,825.98-GL CONTRACTING INC SIDEWALK & TRAILS BAL SHT RETAINAGE PAYABLE 36,519.64SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 34,693.66 3,247.50GLACIAL RIDGE, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 3,247.50 68,932.39GMH ASPHALT CORPORATION SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,610.75SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 120,001.26PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINAGE PAYABLE 76,787.19PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29,624.50PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 40,885.80WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 347,841.89 60.97GOERGES JASON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 60.97 9,405.00GOLIATH HYDRO-VAC INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 9,405.00 311.85GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 15 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 311.85 134.28GRAINGER INC, WW GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 195.22FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 124.01SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 453.51 4,500.00GRANICUSCABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,500.00 310.00GRAPHIC SOURCE INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 310.00 11,474.10GREAT NORTHERN LANDSCAPES INC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 11,474.10 6,621.90GREAT RIVER GREENING PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,621.90 569.60GREENHAVEN PRINTING SOLID WASTE G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 569.60 1,246.67GS SYSTEMS, INC.WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,246.67 1.25GTS HAVAC INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 108.75BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 110.00 15,476.66GUARDIAN FLEET SUPPLY CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY 15,476.66 79.49GUNDERSON JOEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 79.49 108.00HAMILTON, MIKE VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.00 1,395.00HAMLINE UNIVERSITY PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 1,395.00 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 16 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 8,320.00HANSEN BROS. FENCE PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,320.00 12,742.32HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 12,742.32 265.00HEALTHPARTNERSHUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 2,738.00FIRE OPERATIONS HEALTH & WELLNESS 3,003.00 314.00HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,860.04ADMINISTRATION G & A POSTAGE 8,206.20ADMINISTRATION G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 7,500.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,103.65POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 407.75POLICE G & A JAIL/DETENTION SERVICES 375.00HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET LAND HELD FOR RESALE 36.00HIA ADMIN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 455,455.53ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A TAX INCREMENT - REPAYMENT 101,158.40WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A TAX INCREMENT - REPAYMENT 527.89PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 582,944.46 685.62HENRICKSEN PSG FACILITIES MCTE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 685.62 1,209.38HESKIN DANIEL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 1,209.38 15.69HETHERINGTON CHAD & KATHRYN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 15.69 330.00HIETALA BETTE GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 330.00 10,545.00HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 10,545.00 2,274.63HOLLOWAY ALLIE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 2,274.63 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 17 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,121.65HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 611.88FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER 34.13WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 31.69PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 330.87PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.59PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 121.20PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 48.79PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT MAINTENAN OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 57.40SKATING RINK MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 7.99REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,383.19 101.95HOME DEPOT CREDIT SRVCS FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 139.48WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 87.92WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 329.35 1,641.70HOMECO INSULATION, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 1,641.70 519.67HOTSY OF MN BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 519.67 75.60HOWLEY DANIEL & BRIANNA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 75.60 99.01HUMISTON DAVID WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 99.01 400.00IACONO CHRIS BROOMBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 400.00 409.50ICCBLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 409.50 15.00ICE SPORTS INDUSTRY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 15.00 350.00IDEAL SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 350.00 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 18 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 65.00IKEMAN AMANDA BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 3,250.00IMA GROUP MANAGEMENT CO.HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 3,250.00 1,755.30IMPACT PROVEN SOLUTIONS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,755.29SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,755.30SOLID WASTE G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,755.30STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,021.19 53.33IMSDAHL MELISSA INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 53.33 44.38INDELCOWATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 44.38 648.95INGLASGO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 648.95 8,700.00INTECH SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,700.00 72.61INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,183.90GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,256.51 586.91J & B SERVICE AND SUPPLY FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 586.91 9,150.00J.P SCHMITZ CONSTRUCTION CO LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 9,150.00 2.24JERRY'S HARDWARE FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 13.44POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 8.09POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 24.16WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 16.26WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 151.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.69PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SMALL TOOLS City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 19 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 254.48 305.33JUREK JESSIE ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 305.33 60.00K-DESIGNERS BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 60.00 125.00KELLY SCHUG SHANNON GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 125.00 200.00KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP LLC HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200.00 90,758.97KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 975.90PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,927.71WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,927.71STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 97,590.29 26,535.80KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 285.34PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 855.99WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 855.99STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 28,533.12 695.00KRECH, O'BRIEN, MUELLER & WASS INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 695.00 1,652.00KRUELLE, BRYAN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 1,652.00 79.83KURZEKA, LOUISE REFORESTATION CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 79.83 21.92KUSNETZ BOB SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 169.09PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.15WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.66SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31.31STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 313.13 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 20 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 65.00LA BARERA MIKE BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 154.74LAWRENCE JOE FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 154.74 49.55LAWSON PRODUCTS INC GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 49.55 5,114.00LEADS ONLINE POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,114.00 2.17-LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST P&C FINANCE G & A BLDG & CONTENTS INSURANCE 288,891.17UNINSURED LOSS B/S PREPAID EXPENSES 487.00UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 289,376.00 20,052.00LEAK LOCATORS OF MT WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 20,052.00 705.00LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 705.00 1,200.00LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC ENGINEERING G & A ENGINEERING SERVICES 1,200.00 1,250.00LEOTEK ELECTRONICS USA LLC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 30,000.00RELAMPINGOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 31,250.00 1,575.00LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 330.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,905.00 302.10LIFE SUPPORT INNOVATIONS FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 302.10 2,502.05LIFESAVER FIRE PROTECTION GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,502.05 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 21 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,129.00LINCO FAB, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 5,129.00 1,035.01LITTLE FALLS MACHINE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,035.01 1,182.38LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES 1,182.38 80.64LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 345.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 425.64 43,103.00LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 65,413.40TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 108,516.40 106.66LOWE ALLISON INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 106.66 14.74MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 774.60GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 789.34 1,840.00MACTACABLE TV G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 1,840.00 18,342.62MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 10,354.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 28,696.62 240.00MAILING REQUIREMENTS COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 240.00 58.08MANDLER, CARRIE WESTWOOD G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 58.08 3,500.00MANIBOG BEN EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 3,500.00 34,870.87MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY OF GAINSVILLE, INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 22 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 34,870.87 760.00MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 760.00 2,016.00MARTINEZ THOMAS EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 2,016.00 55.51MASON JACOB BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 55.51 765.74MAUSETH ADREA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 765.74 580.00MCCUDDIN BRYANT BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 580.00 5,061.17MCNAMARA CONSTRUCTION INC.WESTWOOD G & A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 5,061.17 283.67MEDINA TERESA PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 249.28PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 326.65STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 859.60 332.62MENARDSFACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.40SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 38.28PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 172.11WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 16.00WINTER BREAK GENERAL SUPPLIES 107.64REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 678.05 1,000.00METRO BALLET ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 1,705.00METRO BLOOMS STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,149.53STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,854.53 521.85METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 23 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 388,094.20OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 1,140.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 389,756.05 350.00MEYER BARBARA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 350.00 1,780.00MHSRC/RANGE POLICE G & A TRAINING 1,780.00 250.00MID-STATES ORGANIZED CRIME INFO CENTER POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 250.00 38.55MIDWEST BADGE & NOVELTY CO COMMUNICATIONS/DISPATCH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 38.55 772.90MIDWEST SPECIALTY MAINTENANCE, INC. GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 772.90 848.16MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS 848.16 468.67MINNESOTA EQUIPMENT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 468.67 300.00MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY SEWER UTILITY G&A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 300.00 1,579.00MINNESOTA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 280.00PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 160.00WESTWOOD G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 440.00ENTERPRISE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 2,459.00 50.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 50.00 17.29MITCHELL ABBEY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 17.29 100.52MITCHELL DANIEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 24 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 100.52 65.00MITCHELL SCHERIE BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 173.05MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION TRAFFIC CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,449.71STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 34.93WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 122.26SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 139.73STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,919.68 67.55MONGE MALLORY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 67.55 4,385.75MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS INC COMMUNICATIONS/DISPATCH RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 4,385.75 135.00MPLS/ST PAUL BUSINESS JOURNAL COMM DEV PLANNING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 135.00 133.39MSC INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 133.39 3,642.40MULTIPLE CONCEPTS INTERIORS GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 839.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 4,481.40 28.93MURAN RICARDO WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 28.93 1,676.00MVTL LABORATORIES REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,676.00 50.38NAC MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SERVICES BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 18,736.85GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 211.75REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 18,998.98 2,016.00NADEM, SIAR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 2,016.00 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 25 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,251.10NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 138.76REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 23.88GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.31GENERAL REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 1,452.05 65.00NATZEL STACY BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 125.00NBPA- MN POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 25.00COMMUNICATIONS/DISPATCH SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 150.00 574.16ND CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS 574.16 274.66NELSON ALEXIA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 274.66 84.21NELSON CHARLES WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 84.21 71.16NGO HOANG WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 71.16 11,100.55NORDSTROM ARCHITECTURAL SHEET METAL ANDGO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 11,100.55 80.48NORDSTROM, TIM FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 80.48 53.33NORDSTRUM ELIZABETH INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 53.33 32,548.48NOR-SONS, INC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,548.48 40.99NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,125.78PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,166.77 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 26 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 859.35NORTH COUNTRY CONCRETE INC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 859.35 4,935.17NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 4,935.17 8,223.78NORTHLAND PAVING GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 18,236.61GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 26,460.39 579.87NOVAK WALLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 579.87 97.16NYCKLEMOE ERIC & MICHELLE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 97.16 600.00OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 295.52OFFICE DEPOT FINANCE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 72.74POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 51.54FIRE OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 149.35PUBLIC WORKS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 65.98PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 635.13 26.45OKEY MIKE PUBLIC WORKS G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 26.45 54.50ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 257.89FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105.50OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 417.89 65.00OSEI TIA BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 88.38OSTENDORF RACHEL ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 88.38 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 27 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,701.47OVERHEAD DOOR CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 2,701.47 15.00OWINGS LORRAINE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 15.00 187.49OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 187.49 590.00PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 590.00 449.15PARK CHRYSLER JEEP GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 449.15 141.40PATRICK, MICHEAL WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 141.40 50.00PAVLIK, JULIE BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 50.00 115.00PEHL KRISTEN BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 115.00 950.62PELUF TERRENCE FACILITIES MCTE G & A PERA - COORDINATED 950.62 50.00PETRIE KRISTA BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 50.00 34.66PETTY CASH - WWNC WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.86HALLOWEEN PARTY GENERAL SUPPLIES 38.52 3,500.00PIVEC, MICHAEL EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 3,500.00 65.00PLADSON KRISTIN BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 120,000.00PLAYPOWER LT FARMINGTON INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 28 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 120,000.00 348.67POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 348.67 11,100.00POVOLNY SPECIALTIES SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 5,005.00SPEC ASSMT CONSTRUCTION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 16,105.00 450.00PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 1,265.00PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 1,265.00 82.98PREMIUM WATERS INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 12.00FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 94.98 2,138.00PRO HYDRO- TESTING, LLC.FIRE OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,138.00 1,270.00PROMWACHIRAYAN WAT CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS ZONING/SUBDIVISION 1,270.00 120.00PUMP & METER SERVICE VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 120.00 34,224.80RACHEL CONTRACTING INC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 422.00-GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 33,802.80 4,625.00RAM CONSTRUCTION SERVICES OF MINNESOTA GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 4,625.00 4,347.70RANDY'S ENVIORMENTAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 2,322.17REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 6,669.87 600.00REACH MEDIA NETWORK REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600.00 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 29 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 83,158.25-REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION, LLC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS BAL SHT RETAINAGE PAYABLE 1,663,164.93SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 59,468.66-STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 1,036,815.10STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,470.00PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,088.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 123,000.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,709,911.12 235.92REGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS, LLC.POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 235.92 69.90RICOH USA INC IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 69.90 43.11RIVALL TOM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 43.11 417.19RMS RENTALS GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 2,595.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,012.19 2,595.00ROAD MACHINERY & SUPPLIES CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,595.00 134.64ROBERT B HILL CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 343.38REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 478.02 727.20ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,188.90FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,916.10 3,420.00ROSCHON CORPERATION STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL 3,420.00 100.00ROTARY CLUB OF SLP ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 100.00POLICE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 200.00 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 30 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 26,134.85S & S CONCRETE AND MASONRY GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 26,134.85 25,013.59S.M. HENTGES & SONS, INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS BAL SHT RETAINAGE PAYABLE 47,382.50SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,100.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 75,496.09 2,479.60SAMBATEK, INC.WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,479.60 5,544.00SAVATREETREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 5,544.00 342.00SCHMOCKER TYLER BROOMBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 342.00 159.99SEIM MICHELLE INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 159.99 130.00SERIE-STOCKTON DANIELLE BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 130.00 965.00SESACREC CENTER BUILDING LICENSES 965.00 725.00SETS DESIGN INC.COMMUNICATIONS/DISPATCH OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 725.00 600.00SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING TREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 235.00TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 835.00 8,814.58SHAW STEWARD LUMBER COMPANY GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 1,696.60-GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 7,117.98 115.00SHIMEK CODY BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 115.00 60.95SHINGLES KORI ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 31 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 60.95 9,629.15SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 9,629.15 17.54SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 19.37FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 563.67POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 745.22WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 17.54ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,363.34 158.40SHUBEEBLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 158.40 2,439.00SIDAL CROSSROADS CO. LLC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A RENTAL HOUSING 2,439.00 172.00SIGN PRODUCERS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 172.00 853.00SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 628.00PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,481.00 53.33SIMENSON KAROLINA INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 53.33 32.92SINGLETON JAY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 32.92 73.00SKALLET, DAVID BLDG & ENERGY G & A LICENSES 73.00 1,342.50SKOLD SPECIALTY CONTRACTING LLC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 1,342.50 219.15SMITH LAURA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219.15 63.74SMITH, TIM FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 32 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 63.74 44.67SORENSEN KEVIN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 44.67 33,375.00SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECH INC SOLID WASTE G&A YARD WASTE SERVICE 8,896.05SOLID WASTE G&A ORGANICS 42,271.05 13,211.45SPLIT ROCK STUDIOS GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 913.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 14,124.45 336.60SPS COMPANIES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 189.69WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 526.29 3,634.22ST LOUIS PARK FRIENDS OF THE ARTS PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,634.22 267.72ST PAUL CITY OF PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 267.72WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 535.44 23,230.11ST PAUL UTILITIES GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 23,230.11 9,395.00ST. LOUIS PARK HOUSING AUTHORITY KIDS IN THE PARK RENT ASSIST OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,395.00 612.00STANLEY ACCESS TECH LLC REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 612.00 9,254.40STERN DRYWALL, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 9,254.40 799.00STORM TRAINING GROUP POLICE G & A TRAINING 799.00 62.50STRAND MFG CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 62.50 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 33 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,875.00STRATEGIC INSIGHTS CO TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,875.00 147.98STREICHER'S POLICE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,999.92POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 264.00POLICE G & A POLICE EQUIPMENT 7,411.90 3,128.79SUBURBAN TIRE WHOLESALE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 3,128.79 732.00SUMMIT COMPANIES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 732.00 20,475.10SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC REILLY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 20,475.10 908.68SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,122.26GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,030.94 10,608.92SUNDIAL SOLAR ENERGY GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 10,608.92 12.50SUNDQUIST JENNIFER BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 502.50BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 515.00 49,000.00SUNSET RIDGE BUSINESS PARK CONDO. RIGHT-OF-WAY OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 49,000.00 837.50SVOR BRENT & ANDREA STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 837.50 2,862.00SWANSON FLO-SYSTEMS CO WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,862.00 1,302.23SYSKO KENNETH EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A TUITION 1,302.23 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 34 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,000.00TANGNEY JOHN ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 3,000.00 65.00TATE SARAH BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 7.74TELELANGUAGE INC ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7.74 176.65TERMINAL SUPPLY CO GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.56GENERAL REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 204.21 62.00TERMINIX PROCESSING CENTER FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62.00 3,230.00THE LYNDE COMPANY LLC SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,230.00 54.63THE SHERWINN WILLIAMS CO WATER UTILITY G&A BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 54.63 887.00THE TRANSPORTATION ALLIANCE ENGINEERING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 887.00 1,860.71THE WILEY LAW OFFICE HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,860.71 15.00THIELEN SCOTT ROC PUBLIC SKATE & ADMISSION REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 15.00 319.98THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 319.98 200.00THRIVEPASSEMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 200.00 972.90THYSSENKRUPP ELEVATOR REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 972.90 894.50TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 35 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 35Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 894.50 90.00TNC INDUSTRIES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 90.00 168.30TOWMASTERCAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY 168.30 41,393.00TREE TRUST REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,240.00BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43,633.00 13,500.00TRELIPE HOLDINGS LLC.ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 13,500.00 360.00TRITECH SOFTWARE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 360.00 76.00TURNQUIST AUDREY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 76.00 2,504.85TWIN CITY ACOUSTICS INC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 2,504.85 795.00TWIN CITY GARAGE DOOR CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 795.00 5,103.21TWIN CITY OUTDOOR SERVICES INC SNOW PLOWING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,634.00SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,377.00SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,114.21 55.99TWIN CITY SAW CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 55.99 360.00UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,239.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 493.00TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,092.00 634.43ULINESEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 36 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 36Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 94.80REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 729.23 969.50ULTIMATE SAFETY CONCEPTS INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,308.48FIRE OPERATIONS REPAIRS 2,277.98 50.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNITED WAY 50.00 664.83US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS 664.83 23,723.15VALLEY-RICH CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 23,723.15 29.33VAUGHAN, JIM NATURAL RESOURCES G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 29.33 2,407.40VERIZONSEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE 34,498.87CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 72.76CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 36,979.03 52,789.25VINCO INC GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 4,512.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 57,301.25 5,580.00VITAL WORKLIFE EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A HEALTH INSURANCE 5,580.00 5,000.00WALEGA DARLA & CHRISTOPHER ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 5,000.00 52.00WARNER'S STELLIAN CO BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 52.00 471.00WARNING LITES OF MN INC TRAFFIC CONTROL OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 471.00 2,171.52WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 37 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 37Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,171.52 2,964.00WEST LAKE QUARTER FIRE OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 2,964.00 226.55WEST, JASON ORGANIZED REC G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 226.55 65.00WICKEN TIFFANY BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 8.97WISCONSIN NATURAL RESOURCES NATURAL RESOURCES G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 8.97 726.52WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC FIRE OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 726.52 207.50WOODS ANGELA INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 207.50 618.00WS & D PERMIT SERVICE BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 618.00 847.77WSB ASSOC INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,027.75SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,235.48STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,111.00 12,486.29XCEL ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 489.20PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 55,763.10WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,522.82REILLY G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 37.24SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 933.92STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 4,652.93PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 43.96BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 70.37WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 18,629.00REC CENTER BUILDING ELECTRIC SERVICE 94,628.83 29.00YAMADA KAORI ROC PUBLIC SKATE & ADMISSION REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 38 1/27/2021CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 13:24:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 38Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 1/22/202112/26/2021 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 29.00 .25YESNES LINDA & DANIEL BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 65.25 4,120.00ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS INC SWEEPING EQUIPMENT PARTS 4,120.00 65.00ZOLLICOFFER MARC BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 65.00 Report Totals 6,986,052.62 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 39 Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4b Executive summary Title: Ordinance implementing a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance imposin g a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy , and approve the summary ordinance for publication . Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to increase the franchise fees for CenterPoint Energy to assist in funding the city’s Pavement Management Program? Summary: The city h as imposed franchise fees on CenterPoint En ergy s ince 2004. K eeping w ith council direction of reviewing the fees every other year, the fees were increased to $4.00/month for a resid ential custom er in 2016 and $5.50/ month in 2019. Staff recomm ends the fees are increased to $6.75/ month for a residential customer in 2021. Staff is proposing, and CenterPoint supports, that their franchise fee is consistent with the franchise fee imposed on X cel Energy. CenterPoint and Xcel have each reviewed the new fees and ordinance and preliminarily approv ed them. Due to t iming and public u tiliti es commission action , the u tilities won’t change the billing until June 2021. City council approved first reading of this ordinance on J an. 19, 2021. Financial or budget considerations: The city’s Pavement Management Program is currently funded by franchise fee revenues, collected by both Xcel and CenterPoint. Based on the current fees, total franchise fees generate approximately $4.03 million annually (CenterPoint - $1.57 million; X cel - $2.46 million ). The proposed increase in the CenterPoint franchise fee would add an e stimated $313,358 in additional annual revenue to the Pavement Management Program and provide greater sustainability into the future. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion Ordinance Summary ordinance for publication Prepared by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt , chief financial officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b ) Page 2 Title: Ordinance implementing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation Discussion Background: In 1993, the city adopted an ordinance granting CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation (D/B/A CenterPoint Energy) an electrical services utility franchise in the city. That ordinance allowed the city to impose a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy. The new ordinance was approved in September 2016 and has a 20-year term. Most of the franchise fees in St. Louis Park are used to fund the cost the city experiences to maintain, reconstruct and repair the street system via the annual Pavement Management Program. In addition, a portion of the funds is used to reconstruct alleys, repair existing sidewalks and maintain parking lots adjacent to municipal buildings. The franchise fee is essentially a user fee collected from customers on their utility bill and paid to CenterPoint Energy. The utility then functions essentially as a pass-through entity, with the franchise fee revenue being remitted to the City of St. Louis Park. Present considerations: As discussed with the council on Nov. 23, 2020, staff is proposing a $1.25/month fee increase to residential customers for 2021 to continue funding the Pavement Management Program. Based on customer class, other customers would see an increase of $2/month per utility. Residential customers make up approximately 90% of the total customers. The city also imposes an equivale nt franchise fee on Xcel. Staff is also proposing (under separate action) to increase Xcel’s current basic franchise fee by $1.25/month per utility for residential customers . Per the city’s Long Range Financial Management Plan, by increasing franchise fees in 2021, it is projected that the Pavement Management Program could be funded entirely by franchise fees making the fund sustainable for the next two years based on projected expenditures and no significant changes to the program. Based on recent discussions with CenterPoint Energy staff , they do not oppose this proposed increase in the franchise fee. Next steps: The following steps outline the adoption process to be followed. 1.Ordinances must contain all the terms and conditions of the franchise 2.Franchise ordinances require a public hearing 3.At least seven days must pass between first reading (public hearing) and 2nd reading 4.At second reading motion will be “Motion to adopt the ordinance, approve the summary and authorize summary publication” 5.Ordinance becomes effective 90 days following adoption Based on the above process, staff has developed the following steps and schedule for adopting the franchise ordinance and franchise fee ordinance: First Reading of Ordinance 1/19/2021 Second Reading of Ordinance 2/1/2021 Date of Publication 2/11/2021 Utilities begin collection 6/1/2021 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b ) Page 3 Title: Ordinance implementing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation Ordinance No. ____-21 Ordinance implementing a natural gas franchise fee on CenterPoint E nergy Resources Corporation d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnesota G as (“CenterPoint Energy”), its successors and assigns, f or p roviding g as service within the City o f St. L ouis P ark The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The City of St. Louis Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance. Subd. 1. Purpose. The St. Louis Park City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide gas s ervices w ithin the City of S t. Louis Park. (a)Pursuant to City Ordinance 2507-16, a Fra nchise Agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation d/b/a CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas, its successors and assigns, the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy in an amount and fee design as set forth in Section 8 of the CenterPoint Energy Resources Franchise and in the fee schedule attached hereto as Schedule A. Subd. 2. Franchise Fee Statement. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on CenterPoint Energy, its succe ssors and assigns, under its natural gas franchise in accordance with the schedule attached here to and made a part of this Ordinance, commencing with the CenterPoint Energy June, 2021 billing month. This fee is an account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for natural gas service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise, each premise (address) shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company’s manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the city will control. Subd. 3. Payment. The said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 9 of the Franchise. Subd. 4. Surcharge. The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b ) Page 4 Title: Ordinance implementing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation Company for the cost of the fee, consistent with the Minnesota Public Utility Commission’s March 23, 2011 Order establishing franchise fee filing requirements in Docket No. E,G999/CI- 09-970. Subd. 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforceme nt of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Subd. 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after the sending of written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to CenterPoint Energy by certified mail. Collection of the fee shall commence as provided above. First Reading of Ordinance 01/19/2021 Second Reading of Ordinance 02/01/2021 Date of Publication 02/11/2021 Utilities begin collection 06/01/2021 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b ) Page 5 Title: Ordinance implementing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation SCHEDULE A Franchise Fee Rates: G as Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to retail customers within the City: Class Amount per month Residential $6.75 Commercial A $6.75 Commercial B $12.00 Commercial C $48.50 SVDF A& B $48.50 LVDF $148.50 Franchise fees are submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: J anuary – March collections due by April 30. April – June collections due by July 31. July – September collections due by October 31. October – December collections due by January 31. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4b ) Page 6 Title: Ordinance implementing a Franchise Fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation Summary for publication Ordinance No.____-21 Ordinance implementing a natural gas franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy Resources Corporation d/b/a/ CenterPoint Energy Minnesota Gas (“CenterPoint Energy”) This ordinance states that St. Louis Park City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide gas services within the City of St. Louis Park. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: February 11, 2021 Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4c Executive summary Title: Ordinance implementing a franchise fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance imposing a franchise fee on Xcel Energy, and approve the summary ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to increase the franchise fees for Xcel Energy to assist in funding the city’s Pavement Management Program? Summary: The city has impos ed franchise fees on Xcel Energy since 2004. Keeping with council direction of reviewing the fees every other year, the fees were increased to $4.00/month for a residential customer in 2016 and $5.50/ month in 2019. Staff recommends the fees are increased to $6.75/ month for a residential customer in 2021. Staff is proposing, and Xcel supports, that their franchise fee is consistent with the franchise fee imposed on CenterPoint Energy. Xcel and CenterPoint have each reviewed the new fees and ordinance and preliminarily approved them. Due to timing and public utilities commission action , the utilities won’t change the billing until June 2021. The city council approved the first reading of this ordinance on Jan . 19, 2021. Financial or budget considerations: The city’s Pavement Management Program is currently funded by franchise fee revenues, collected by both Xcel and CenterPoint. Based on the current fees, total franchise fees generate approximately $4.03 million annually (CenterPoint - $1.57 million; Xcel - $2.46 million). The proposed increase in the Xcel franchise fee would add an estimated $425,824 in additional annual revenue to the Pavement Management Program and provide greater sustainability into the future. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion Ordinance Summary ordinance for publication Prepared by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Reviewed by: Melanie Schmitt , chief financial officer Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c ) Page 2 Title: Ordinance implementing a franchise fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Discussion Background: In 1993, the city adopted an ordinance granting Northern States Power Company (D/B/A Xcel Energy) an electrical services utility franchise in the city. That ordinance allowed the city to impose a franchise fee on Xcel. The new ordinance was approved in September 2016 and has a 20-year term. Most of the franchise fees in St. Louis Park are used to fund the cost the city experiences to maintain, reconstruct and repair the street system via the annual Pavement Management Program. In addition, a portion of the funds is used to reconstruct alleys, repair existing sidewalks and reconstruct parking lots adjacent to municipal buildings. The franchise fee is essentially a user fee collected from customers on their utility bill and paid to Xcel. The utility then functions essentially as a pass-through entity, with the franchise fee revenue being remitted to the City of St. Louis Park. Present considerations: As discussed with the council most recently on Nov. 23, 2020, staff is proposing a $1.25/month fee increase to residential customers for 2021 to continue funding the Pavement Management Program. Based on customer class, other customers would see an increase of $2/month per utility. Residential customers make up approximately 90% of the total customers. The city also imposes an equivalent franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy. Staff is also proposing (under separate action) to increase CenterPoint’s current basic franchise fee by $1.25/month per utility for residential customers . Per the city’s Long Range Financial Management Plan, by increasing franchise fees in 2021, it is projected that the Pavement Management Program could be funded entirely by franchise fees making the fund sustainable for the next two years based on projected expenditures and no significant changes to the program. Based on recent discussions with Xcel staff , they do not oppose this proposed increase in the franchise fee. Next steps: The following steps outline the adoption process to be followed. 1.Ordinances must contain all the terms and conditions of the franchise 2.Franchise ordinances require a public hearing 3.At least seven days must pass between first reading (public hearing) and 2nd reading 4.At second reading motion will be “Motion to adopt the ordinance, approve the summary and authorize summary publication” 5.Ordinance becomes effective 90 days following adoption Based on the above process, staff has developed the following steps and schedule for adopting the franchise ordinance and franchise fee ordinance: First Reading of Ordinance 1/19/2021 Second Reading of Ordinance 2/1/2021 Date of Publication 2/11/2021 Utilities begin collection 6/1/2021 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c ) Page 3 Title: Ordinance implementing a franchise fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Ordinance No.____-21 Ordinance implementing an electric service franchise fee on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, its successors and assigns, for providing electric service within the City of St. Louis Park The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Se ction 1. The City of St. Louis Park Municipal Code is hereby amended to include reference to the following Special Ordinance. Subd. 1. Purpose . The St. Louis Park City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of St. Louis Park. (a)Pursuant to City Ordinance 2505-16, a Franchise Agreement between the City of St Louis Park and Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns, the City has the right to impose a franchise fee on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation, its successors and assigns, in an amount and fee design as set forth in Section 9 of the Northern States Power Company Franchise and in the fee schedule attached hereto as Schedule A. Subd. 2. Franchise Fee Statement. A franchise fee is hereby imposed on Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota Corporation, its successors and assigns, under its electric franchise in accordance with the schedule attached here to and made a part of this Ordinance, commencing with the NSPM June 2021 billing month. This fee is an account-based fee on each premise and not a meter-based fee. In the event that an entity covered by this ordinance has more than one meter at a single premise, but only one account, only one fee shall be assessed to that account. If a premise has two or more meters being billed at different rates, the Company may have an account for each rate classification, which will result in more than one franchise fee assessment for electric service to that premise. If the Company combines the rate classifications into a single account, the franchise fee assessed to the account will be the largest franchise fee applicable to a single rate classification for energy delivered to that premise. In the event any entities covered by this ordinance have more than one premise, each premise (address) shall be subject to the appropriate fee. In the event a question arises as to the proper fee amount for any premise, the Company’s manner of billing for energy used at all similar premises in the city will control. Subd. 3. Payment. The said franchise fee shall be payable to the City in accordance with the terms set forth in Section 9 of the Franchise. Subd. 4. Surcharge . The City recognizes that the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission may allow Company to add a surcharge to customer rates of city residents to reimburse Company for the cost of the fee. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c ) Page 4 Title: Ordinance implementing a franchise fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Subd. 5. Enforcement. Any dispute, including enforcement of a default regarding this ordinance will be resolved in accordance with Section 2.5 of the Franchise Agreement. Subd. 6. Effective Date of Franchise Fee. The effective date of this Ordinance shall be after its publication and ninety (90) days after the sending of written notice enclosing a copy of this adopted Ordinance to NSPM by certified mail. Collectio n of the fee shall commence as provided above. First Reading of Ordinance 1/19/2021 Second Reading of Ordinance 2/01/2021 Date of Publication 2/11/2021 Utilities begin collection 6/01/2021 Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to Form and Execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c ) Page 5 Title: Ordinance implementing a franchise fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) SCHEDULE A Franchise Fee Rates: Electric Utility The franchise fee shall be in an amount determined by applying the following schedule per customer premise/per month based on metered service to retail customers within the City: Class Amount per month Residential $ 6.75 Sm C & I – Non-Dem $12.00 Sm C & I – Demand $48.50 Large C & I $148.50 Public Street Ltg $ 0 Muni Pumping –N/D $12.00 Muni Pumping – Dem $48.50 Franchise fees are submitted to the City on a quarterly basis as follows: J anuary – March collections due by April 30. April – June collections due by July 31. July – September collections due by October 31. October – December collections due by January 31. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4c ) Page 6 Title: Ordinance implementing a franchise fee on Northern States Power Co. (dba Xcel Energy) Summary for publication Ordinance No.____-21 Ordinance implementing an electric service franchise fee on Northern States Power Company This ordinance states that St. Louis Park City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to impose a franchise fee on those public utility companies that provide electric services within the City of St. Louis Park. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: February 11, 2021 Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4d Executive summary Title: Monterey-Beltline -36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid Recommended action: •Motion to adopt Resolution approving the final plans and specifications and authorizing bidding documents for Monterey Drive , Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street improvement project (4020-1101 and 4021-2000). •Motion to authorize an amendment of the professional services contract 144-18 with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. in the amount of $90,000 for the final design of the Monterey Drive - Beltline Blvd -36th Street improvement projects (4020-1101 and 4021-2000). Policy consideration: Does the city council wish staff to continue to pursue the bikeway, sidewalk, utility, and roadway improvements identified in this report? Summary: On Oct. 21, 2019, the city council approved the staff recommended layouts for bicycle , pedestrian, street and utility infrastructure improvements on Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street. The final design and construction of these improvements were split into three projects. The limits for these projects are: •Project no. 1: Monterey Drive from Excelsior Boulevard to Park Commons Drive was constructed in 2020 to coincide with the Bridgewater Bank development. •Project no. 2: Monterey Drive from Park Commons Drive through the intersection of Beltline Boulevard, Beltline Boulev ard from 36th Street to the north side of Park Glen Road and along 36th Street from Beltline Boulevard to the intersection of the Hwy 100 northbound ramps just west of Target. •Project no. 3: The final project is on 36th Street from the Hwy 100 northbound ramps to Wooddale Avenue. This project is expected to be constructed in 2022 and is not discussed in this report. Th is report focuses on project no. 2 and includes the addition of on- and off-street bike facilities, rehabilitation of the roadway, constructing a roundabout at the intersection of 36th Street and Beltline Boulevard, reconstruction of sidewalk and replacing a sanitary sewer forcemain. Additional project details can be found later in this report. Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the city’s capital improvement plan (CIP) for 2021. The project is estimated to cost $3,753,094. Details on the project cost and funding are discussed later in this report. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion; Resolution; Overall project area map; Monterey Dr. – Beltline -36th St. project map ; Overall 2021 financial summary Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, senior engineering project manage r Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director; Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d ) Page 2 Title: Monterey -Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid Discussion Background: The project improvements are part of the city's Connect the Park plan. Connect the Park is designed to create a system that provides sidewalks approximately every 1/4-mile and bikeways every 1/2-mile in order to improve pedestrian and bicycle connectivity throughout the community. Throughout the public engagement and preliminary design process, this project was discussed concurrently with a larger initiative that included all of Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard to Park Glen Road and 36th Street from the REC Center to Wooddale Avenue (Attachment 1). Information regarding this project was shared with the city council at the Sept. 23, 2019 study session, at the Oct. 7, 2019 public hearing and during the Oct. 21, 2019 council action to approve the preliminary layout. Project scope : The project consists of improvements on three roadways near the REC Center and was initiated to enhance biking on these roadways to connect to the larger existing and proposed bike network. Along with the bikeway enhancements, there are other infrastructure elements that have been added to the scope of this project. The limits of the project can be seen on Attachment 2 and descriptions of the proposed work can be found below. •Monterey Drive from Park Commons Drive through the intersection of Beltline Boulevard /36th Street o Rehabilitation of the existing pavement o A reduction from 4 lanes of traffic to 3 lanes to allow for buffered on-street bike lanes o Replacing the traffic signal at the intersection of Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street with a roundabout Create full access (in and out) to the REC Center. The roundabout will have solar-powered rectangular rapid flashing beacons (RRFBs) at all 4 legs of the roundabout to enhance pedestrian crossing safety. In addition to the RRFBs there are center refuge medians and a reduced number of travel lanes that significantly decrease the crossing distance for any pedestrian. The longest pedestrian crossing at the proposed roundabout is 26 feet and two lanes of traffic, with most of the crossings at 14 feet and one lane of traffic. This is an improvement from the current signalized intersection with the longest crossing distance at approximately 85 feet and four lanes of traffic. The roundabout will shift the intersection northeast to prevent any loss of REC Center parking. This will require some cottonwood trees to be removed in the northeast corner of the intersection. Staff is working with City Natural Resources staff to replace the impacted trees. o Installing low maintenance vegetation in center median and roundabout island This vegetation will require annual long -term maintenance by the city. o Restricting the intersection of Melrose Center and Monterey Drive to a right-in right -out access (no left turn to southbound Monterey Drive ) o Complete the installation of a new sanitary sewer forcemain that was started in 2020 with the first Monterey Drive reconstruction City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d ) Page 3 Title: Monterey -Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid o Increase the sidewalk width from 5 feet to 8 feet along the east side of Beltline Boulevard from Bridgewater Bank to the intersection of Beltline Blvd and 36 1/2 Street o Enhancing the existing RRFB at the intersection of 36th 1/2 Street and Monterey Drive by providing a center median to increase pedestrian crossing safety o No changes to the existing parking restrictions • Beltline Boulevard from Monterey Drive to the north side of Park Glen Road o A reduction from 4 lanes of traffic to 3 lanes (one lane in each direction and a center left-turn lane) to install on -street buffered bike lanes to connect to Beltline Boulevard SWLRT Station o Pedestrian crossing at 35th Street to allow future pedestrian access to and from Bass Lake trail system and the Beltline Boulevard Industrial area o No changes to the existing parking restrictions • 36th Street from Beltline Boulevard to the intersection of Hwy 100 northbound ramps, just west of Target o One of the eastbound traffic lanes between Park Center Drive and the roundabout will be removed to allow space for an off-street multi-use trail o No changes to the westbound 36th Street lanes o Create a left turn lane into the ROC from westbound 36th Street o Create a pedestrian refuge median from the Wolfe Park trail to Raleigh Avenue with a striped crosswalk o No changes to the existing parking restrictions • ROC/REC north service road During final plan development, the REC Center staff inquired about the potential to make some improvements to the service drive along the north side building that connects the ROC and REC parking lots. o A new wide multi-use trail is being constructed adjacent to 36th Street, providing a more direct public connection for pedestrians in the corridor. It is recommended that we remove the back of curb sidewalk along the north side of the service road. This will allow the road to be widened from 16 feet to 20 f eet. This additional width will benefit the pick -up and drop -off activities that occu r at the north ROC/REC entrance. In addition, the added width will create space for food trucks to park and not block vehicles during special events. The sidewalk on the south side of the frontage road will remain in place for pedestrians walking along the frontage road. o The pavement along the service road is in poor condition and in need of rehabilitation . To address this, it will be milled and overlaid. o The service road will remain one way and parking restrictions will not change. Construction Staging and Sequencing: Monterey Drive , Beltline Boulevard and 36th Streets are active areas with limited room for contractors to complete the necessary improvements. Work is planned to occur in multiple phases to allow as many of the normal operations of the area to occur as possible. There will need to be access closures, lane closures, road closures and City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d ) Page 4 Title: Monterey -Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid detours to complete all the necessary work. Due to the amount of work and the construction sequencing, work is expected to start in early spring and will continue through late fall. One of the most impactful construction activities is the removal of the traffic signal and construction of the roundabout near the REC Center. Engineering staff has been working with the REC Center staff to understand the pool schedule, rink schedules and special events like Parktacular and to find times that the facility is less dependent on this access. The intersection of Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street will need to completely close to all traffic beginning mid-August through late fall to complete the construction . During this time , traffic will be detoured to other roadways and will use alternate access to the REC/ROC and other facilities like the Melrose Center. Financial considerations: A combination of pavement management, general obligation (GO) bonds, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and watermain funds are expected to be utilized to pay for this project. The updated engineer’s estimate is shown in the table below. CIP Engineer's estimate Construction cost $2,761,700 $3,002,476 Engineering and administration $690,425 $750,619 Total $3,452,125 $3,753,094 Funding sources* General obligation bonds $3,020,875 $914,652 Municipal state aid $0 $94,781 Pavement management $0 $2,196,094 Sanitary sewer $287,500 $375,703 Stormwater utility $107,812 $142,740 Watermain $35,938 $29,124 Total $3,452,125 $3,753,094 *Last fall, during the 2021 budget process, finance took a deep dive into our CIP and how the 10- year projections for debt levy influence the annual budget cycle. This resulted in a shift CIP project funding. This is the reason for the changes in the funding sources shown in the table above. The engineering and administration cost for this project is greater than estimated in the CIP. This is due to the following items being added to the project. It should be noted that the overall project change, $300,969, is less than the cumulative amount of the items identified in the areas below ($412,568), due to quantities in other areas of the project being lower than estimated. • Reconstruction of the ROC/REC north service road – this work was added to the project to take advantage of contract pricing for pavement replacement and improve the operation of the facility at a cost of $106,608. • During the public information process for the Beltline Blvd SWLRT pedestrian improvements project, staff received feedback from the public asking to include a crosswalk 35th Street and Beltline Boulevard . Due to the nature of the type of construction, that work was added to this project at a cost of $22,835. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d ) Page 5 Title: Monterey -Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid • During the final design for the sanitary sewer forcemain replacement, it was determined that addition al upgrades to the lift station were needed. This includes new valves, replacement valves and some additional forcemain pipes within the lift station at a cost of $86,250. • The installation of the 36th Street bikeway from Beltline Boulevard to the intersection of the Hwy 100 northbound ramps just west of Target was originally included in project no. 3 scheduled for 2022. To reduce impacts to the REC/ ROC and provide a logical terminus to the bikeway improvements, it is recommended that it be bid as a part of this project at a cost of $196,875. As the project progressed to final design, there were several items that required additional design efforts to complete and are requested as amendment #2. The coordination with the Beltline Boulevard pedestrian improvements, design changes related to the SWLRT project, additional soil investigation related to the shifted roundabout, the REC/ROC north service road design and some additional effort needed to gain Municipal State Aid plan approval. SRF Contract 144-18 (October 2018) $263,529 Amendment #1 $178,610 Amendment #2 $90,000 Total $532,139 The initial contract, amendment #1 and amendment #2 are within overall estimated project costs shown above. Attached is the overall financial summary for the transportation and maintenance projects included in the 2021 CIP. As each project is brought to the council for final approval and for bid award, this summary will be updated to reflect the bids received. Final numbers will depend on bids received. The total debt levy increase for 2023 is projected to be 3.80% for the projects included in the 2021 CIP. This assumes using 10-year bonding. It is recommended to issue a longer 20-year term for the Louisiana bridge project to reduce 2023 levy impact to 2.3% debt levy increase, this will b e discussed during the 2021 debt issuance for the project. Operation and maintenance costs: This project enhances the existing roadway and sidewalk infrastructure that is currently in place. The roadways and trails maintenance associated with this infrastructure are currently in place; therefore, there is no appreciable increase in annual operational efforts include snow removal, pavement sweeping, and general upkeep. The project also creates new city infrastructure such as landscaped medians and roundabout, bike lane signage and striping, and additional RRFBs. This new infrastructure will require an increase to the operation and recreation budget in 2022 to cover their maintenance. The landscaped medians and landscape in the proposed roundabout represent $18,000 per year in irrigation, maintenance, and associated upkeep. These landscaped areas reduce the impervious surface of the existing roadway network from by 0.17 acres. The bike lane pavement markings (long lines and symbols) and bikeway signage represent approximately $7,000 per year to maintain the markings. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d ) Page 6 Title: Monterey -Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid Schedule and next steps: Staff will bring construction bids back to council in April for approval and anticipate starting construction in late April and completing the project in November 2021. Monterey Drive – Beltline Boulevard - 36th Street Approve final plans and order ad for bid Feb. 1, 2021 Approve construction bids April 2021 Construction April/May – Nov. 2021 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d ) Page 7 Title: Monterey -Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution approving the final plans and authorizing bidding documents for Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street improvement project project numbers 4020-1101 and 4021-2000 Whereas, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the Project Manager related to the Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street improvement project. numbers 4020-1101 and 4021-2000 on October 21, 2019 and Whereas, at the same meeting, the preliminary layout was approved, and final plans were ordered to be developed. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1.The final plans and specifications to construct these improvements, as prepared under the direction of the Project Manager, or designee, are approved. 2.The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official City newspaper and in relevant industry publications an advertisement for bids for the making of said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall appear not less than ten (10) days prior to the date and time bids will be received electronically by the Project Manager and accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5) percent of the amount of the bid. The electronic bids will only be available to view after the bids are closed and the City receives the passcode from the bidding host site. 3.The Project Manager, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly after the opening date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a recommendation to the City Council. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk !( GWX GWX ?A@ 25 3 100 ZARTHANAVESPARK C E N TE R B L V D E X C E LS IO R BLVDSERVICE DR H I G H W A Y 7 RALEIGHAVESGRAND WAY 35TH ST W XENWOODAVESYOSEMITEAVESW O LFE PKWYSALEMAVESPARK C O M M O N S D RWO O D D A L E A VE XENWOODAVESW ALKERST36 1/2 STWYOSEMITEAVES PARK C O M M O N S D R GOODRICH AVE OXFORD ST LYNN AVE S HAMILTON ST 34TH ST WZARTHANAVES PRIVATE RDCAMERATA WAYWEBSTER AVE SMERID IAN LN 33RD ST W LYNNAVESWEBSTERAVESQUENTINAVESSER VI CE D R H I G H W A Y 7 YOSEMITEAVESWOODDALE AVE 33RD S T W P R IV A T E RDWEBSTERAVESUTICA AVES35TH ST W P A R K GL E N R D COUNTY ROA D 2 5 SERVIC ED R H IG H W A Y 7 0 500 1,000250 Feet Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street bikeway and street improvements Overview Map ² 36TH ST W 2021 - BELTLINE BLVD2022 - 2 0 2 0 20 2 1 M O N T E R E Y D R Proposed Roundabout 2021 - 36TH ST W City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Title: Monterey-Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid Page 8 GWX GWX ?A@ !( 25 3 100 EXCEL SI O R B L V D 3 6TH ST W M O N T E R E Y D RPARK CENTER BLVDPARK C E N T E R B L V D RALEIGHAVESKIPLINGAVESBELTLINEBLVDWEBSTERAVESGRAND WAY W O LFEPKW Y38TH ST W E X C E L S IO R B LV D CAMERATA WAY SALEMAVESPARK C O M M O N S D R 36TH ST W 36 1/2 ST W LYNNAVESPARK C O M M O N S D R UTICA A V E SLYNNAVESAUTO CLUB WAY VALLAC H E R A V E 33RD S T W WEBSTERAVES35TH ST W P A R K G L E N RD0 500 1,000250 Feet ´ Monterey Drive/Beltline Boulevard/36th Street Bikeway Improvements Roundabout Construction City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Title: Monterey-Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid Page 9 Overall financial summary 2021 budget Louisiana bridge 4018-1700 Monterey project 4021-2000, 4020-1101 2021 project balance GO Bonds 10,739,050 8,310,604 914,652 1,513,794 Pavement management fund 3,717,622 293,043 2,196,094 1,228,485 Municipal state aid 752,233 657,452 94,781 0 State Of MN bridge bonds 1,502,755 1,502,755 - Federal grant 560,000 - 560,000 Stormwater 967,702 532,623 142,740 292,339 Water 582,263 484,458 29,124 68,681 Sewer 316,250 - 375,703 (59,453) Operations budget 100,000 - 100,000 - Total funding 19,237,875 11,780,935 3,753,094 3,703,846 Awarded Cost Estimate 2021 Transportation and maintenance projects and funding - actual City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4d) Title: Monterey-Beltline-36th improvements - approve plans, specs, and authorize ad for bid Page 10 Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4e Executive summary Title: Final payment resolution – Rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Ave . – Proj ect No. 4019-5000 Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $80,166.03 for project no. 4019-5000 rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Avenue, Contract No. 159-18. Policy consideration: Not applicable Summary: On Nov. 19, 2018, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of $939,950.00 to Classic Protective Coatings for the rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Avenue, project 4019-5000. The project involved a full reconditioning of the interior wet area of the tank to replace the failing coating and bring it into compliance with current requirements. The final contract amount for this project, $986,789.50, is $46,839.50 (5.0%) more than the contract amount awarded. The contract increase is attributed to various constraints and field modifications necessary to provide a quality project. Details on the contract changes are included in the discussion section of this report. Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor under Contract No. 159-18 has been calculated as follows: Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 939,950.00 Change orders/ extra work +$ 46,839.50 Final contract cost $ 986,789.50 Previous payments -$ 906,623.47 Balance due $ 80,166.03 This project was included in the city’s capital improvement plan (CIP). The work was paid for using water utility funds. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Aaron Wiesen, project engineer Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4e ) Page 2 Title: Final payment resolution – Rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Ave. – Project No. 4019-5000 Discussion Background: The existing coating on the tank was installed in 1998 and was no longer effective. A full reconditioning of the interior wet area of the tank was required to replace the failing coating and bring it into compliance with current requirements. Water tank coatings are expected to last 20 to 25 years with minor maintenance. The existing coating on the tank has not received major work for 20 years. An inspection completed in 2017 revealed that the coating is failing and needs replacement. Replacing the coating at this time extended the life of the reservoir. On Nov. 19, 2018, the city council awarded a contract in the amount of $939,950.00 to Classic Protective Coatings for the rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Avenue. The final contract amount for this project is $986,789.50, which is $46,839.50 (5.0%) more than the contract amount awarded. The contract increase is attributed to various constraints and field modifications necessary to provide a quality project. During construction, unexpected items came up that added to the cost of the project. A description of the additional work and deductions is below: •Change Order #1 ($46,839.50 increase) During construction, it was determined that the means and methods to remove the roof structure changed due to unforeseen existing condition of the way the roof plates was welded to the roof structure. The change in conditions required the contractor to install a center support and remove the roof plates and structures together versus piecing out the roof plates individually. This new method requires a larger crane than what was originally estimated in their bid. The city and engineering consultant (KLM Engineering) recognizes the change to the means and methods and recommended the increase in contract cost of $46,839.50 is necessary. The additional work was necessary to ensure a reliable water treatment plant within the community and continue to meet the basic needs of our citizens. Financial or budget considerations: The final cost of the work performed by the contractor under Contract No. 159-18 has been calculated as follows: Original contract (based on estimated quantities) $ 939,950.00 Change Orders/ extra work +$ 46,839.50 Final contract cost $ 986,789.50 Previous payments -$ 906,623.47 Balance due $ 80,166.03 This project was included in the city’s capital improvement plan (CIP). The work was paid for using water utility funds. Due to the nature of our construction projects, unforeseen circumstances, and resident feedback, it is not unusual to have additional work added to our projects. To address this, when the bid was awarded, we assumed a 10% contingency for all aspects of the project. The costs detailed above represent a 5% increase to this project. This is within the planned contingency and there are adequate funds to cover these costs. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4e ) Page 3 Title: Final payment resolution – Rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Ave. – Project No. 4019-5000 Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution authorizing final payment and accepting work for the Rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Avenue City Project No. 4019-5000 Contract No. 159-18 Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows: 1.Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated November 19, 2018, Classic Protective Coatings, Inc. has satisfactorily completed the Rehabilitation of water treatment plant #6, Zarthan Avenue, as per Contract No. 159-18. 2.The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work. 3.The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost is $986,789.50. 4.The City Manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $80,166.03 on this contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4f Executive summary Title: 2021 IUOE Local 49 labor agreement Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution approving labor agreement between the city and the Local 49 employee bargaining group, establishing terms and conditions of employment for one year, from effective Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. Policy consideration: Does council approve the labor agreement between the city and the union? Summary: Staff has been in active negotiations with Local 49 (maintenance) since late 2020. We are pleased to bring this one -year contract to council for approval. Items listed follow the approved compensation plans, budget discussions, and is for one -year, effective Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. Our discussions in negotiation were productive and resulted in this agreement. Of our five bargaining groups, dispatchers were previously settled for 2021 with a multi-year contract. Patrol officers and firefighters are the two remaining contracts out of five in active negotiations for 2021. Sergeants also have a tentative agreement set for approval at this meeting. Financial or budget considerations: The amount recommended has been included in the 2021 budget. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR manager Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 2 Title: 2021 IUOE Local 49 labor agreement Discussion Background: The city and the Local 49 union group have negotiated and come to agreement on the following changes to the contract: •Duration of one year (effective Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021). •Wage increase of 2% for 2021. Hourly market adjustments to job classifications of public service worker, field supervisor, plant operator, and fleet mechanic positions ranging from $0.75 to $0.89/hour, consistent with our compensation program regarding 85th percentile . −Comment: The 2021 general wage increase is consistent with nonunion employees. Prior to negotiations, HR conducted a review of our approved market. In accordance with our compensation plan, market adjustments were added to several positions to ensure that our group remains at our target pay of the 85th percentile . •Increase assignment pay for on-call, lead worker and out of class pay by 2% (consistent with general wage increase). •Add double time for all hours worked on two premium holidays (Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day). −Comment: Previously, double time was only paid on these days if the employee was called in to work unscheduled overtime. •Employer contribution for benefits are the same as other groups for 2021. •Increase compensatory time bank maximum from 40 hours to 60 hours. −Comment: This change will be applied to non-union employees as well. Next steps: Staff recommends approval. All items noted above are included within the 2021 budget. The proposed contract is on file with the city clerk. More detail is available upon request. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4f) Page 3 Title: 2021 IUOE Local 49 labor agreement Resolution No. 21-___ Resolution approving labor agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and International Union of Operating Engineers (IUOE) Local 49 Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec . 31, 2021 Whereas, the city and the union have reached a negotiated settlement covering the terms and conditions of a labor agreement as permitted by the State of Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, and Whereas, the city council may enter into such agreements as authorized by its charter; Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the mayor and city m anager are authorized to execute a collective bargaining agreement, city contract #______ between the City of St. Louis Park and IUOE Local 49, effective Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4g Executive summary Title: 2021 LELS Local #218 Police Sergeants labor agreement Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution approving labor agreement between the city and the police sergeant employee bargaining group, establishing terms and conditions of employment for one year, from Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. Policy consideration: Does council approve the labor agreement between the city and the union? Summary: Staff has been in active negotiations with sergeants since late 2020. We are pleased to bring this one-year contract to council for approval. Items listed follow the approved compensation plans, budget discussions, and is for one -year, effective Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. Our discussions in negotiation were productive and resulted in this agreement. Of our five bargaining groups, dispatchers were previously settled for 2021 with a multi-year contract. Patrol officers and firefighters are the two remaining contracts out of five in active negotiations for 2021. Local 49 (maintenance employees) also have a tentative agreement set for approval at this meeting. Financial or budget considerations: The amount recommended has been included in the 2021 budget. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR manager Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Title: 2021 LELS Local #218 Police Sergeants labor agreement Discussion Background: The city and the police sergeant union group have negotiated and come to agreement on the following changes to the contract: • Duration of one -year Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. • Wage increase of 2% for 2021. Biweekly market adjustments of $46.50 on steps 1 and 2, and $71.47 on step 3 were added , consistent with our compensation program regarding 85th percentile . − Comment: The 2021 general wage increase is consistent with nonunion employees. Prior to negotiations, HR conducted a review of our approved market. In accordance with our compensation plan, market adjustments were added to ensure that our group remains at our target pay of the 85th percentile . • Increase supplemental pay for investigations and administrative sergeants to 5% of top sergeant pay, consistent with the patrol contract, and commensurate with market. • Add double time for all hours worked on two premium holidays (Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day). − Comment: Previously, double time was only paid on these days if the employee was called in to work unscheduled overtime. • Employer contribution for benefits are the same as other groups for 2021. • Addition of a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that provides a pilot program for ensuring rest time for overnight shift employees who are required to appear in court, same as in place with the patrol officers group, ending Dec. 31, 2021. • Adding the designation of Mobile Field Force to the annual supplemental pay category that includes SWAT members and Crisis Negotiators. Mobile Field Force is a new designation that ensures regional response to public safety needs. The pay amount is unchanged at $730/year for those assigned to this work. Next steps: Staff recommends approval. All items noted above are included within the 2021 budget. The proposed contract is on file with the city clerk. More detail is available upon request. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4g) Page 3 Title: 2021 LELS Local #218 Police Sergeants labor agreement Resolution No. 21-___ Resolution approving labor agreement between the City of St. Louis Park an d Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) Local #218 Police Sergeants Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec . 31, 2021 Whereas, the city and the union have reached a negotiated settlement covering the terms and conditions of a labor agreement as permitted by the State of Minnesota Public Employees Labor Relations Act, and Whereas, the city council may enter into such agreements as authorized by its charter; Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that the mayor and city m anager are authorized to execute a collective bargaining agreement, city contract #______ between the City of St. Louis Park and LELS Local #218 Police Sergeants , effective Jan. 1, 2021 – Dec. 31, 2021. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4h Executive summary Title: Bond reimbursement resolution Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution declaring the official intent of the City of St. Louis Park to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city. Policy consideration: Does the city council want to be able to preserve our ability to reimburse ourselves from the bond proceeds for all of our city costs related to the various bonding projects? Summary: The city has in the past adopted reimbursement resolutions for projects to ensure that it has the ability to go back and reimburse itself for the costs incurred before it receives the bond proceeds. This approach is a debt management best practice. This action does not authorize the issuance of bonds, but simply preserves ability to reimburse ourselves . A resolution of intent by the city to use bond proceeds to finance all or a portion of the expenditures is required prior to incurring those costs. The city is also eligible to be reimbursed for “preliminary expenditures”, such as architectural, engineering, and surveying costs, etc., up to an amount allowed under the reimbursement regulations. The attached resolution covers both the construction and preliminary expenditures. The $12,000,000 reimbursement maximum would cover all bond related project costs. The actual amount of bonding may be less than this amount since we may spread some costs over multiple years if the projects move forward and/or timing changes. The issuance of bonds for the following projects is consistent with the long-range financial management plan and debt modeling and helps the city to keep its very strong financial position. The projects include various street, sidewalk, and trail projects in the city (collectively, the “Project”), including the following: Louisiana Ave . Bridge project; Beltline Blvd . and Wooddale bikeway, street maintenance projects-commercial rehab and mill and overlay ; and street rehab – Monterey projects. Financial or budget considerations: It is currently anticipated bonds will be issued later in 2021. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Melanie Schmitt, chief financial officer Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/ HR director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4h ) Page 2 Title: Bond reimbursement resolution Resolution No. 21-____ A resolution declaring the official intent of the City of St. Louis Park to reimburse certain expenditures from the proceeds of bonds to be issued by the city Be it resolved by the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of St. Louis Park, Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “City”) as follows: 1.The Internal Revenue Service has issued Treas. Reg. § 1.150-2 (the “Reimbursement Regulations”) providing that proceeds of tax-exempt bonds used to reimburse prior expenditures will not be deemed spent unless certain requirements are met. 2.The City expects to incur certain expenditures that may be financed temporarily from sources other than bonds, and reimbursed from the proceeds of a tax -exempt bond. 3.The City has determined to make this declaration of official intent (the “Declaration”) to reimburse certain costs from proceeds of bonds in accordance with the Reimbursement Regulations. 4.The City proposes to provide funds for the Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund and the Pavement Management Fund and to undertake various street, sidewalk, and trail projects in the City (collectively, the “Project”), including the following: (a)Louisiana Ave Project; (b)Beltline Blvd and Wooddale Bikeway Projects; and (c)Multiple Street Rehabilitation/Mill & Overlay Projects. 5.The City reasonably expects to reimburse the expenditures made for certain costs of the Project from the proceeds of one or more series of bonds in an estimated maximum aggregate principal amount of $12,000,000. All reimbursed expenditures will be capital expenditures, costs of issuance of the bonds, or other expenditures eligible for reimbursement under Section 1.150-2(d)(3) of the Reimbursement Regulations. 6.This Declaration has been made not later than 60 days after payment of any original expenditure to be subject to a reimbursement allocation with respect to the proceeds of bonds, except for the following expenditures: (a) costs of issuance of bonds; (b) costs in an amount not in excess of $100,000 or 5 percent of the proceeds of an issue; or (c) “preliminary expenditures” up to an amount not in excess of 20 percent of the aggregate issue price of the issue or issues that finance or are reasonably expected by the City to finance the project for which the preliminary expenditures were incurred. The term “preliminary expenditures” includes architectural, engineering, surveying, bond issuance, and similar costs that are incurred prior to commencement of acquisition, construction or rehabilitation of a project, other than land acquisition, site preparation, and similar costs incident to commencement of construction. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4h ) Page 3 Title: Bond reimbursement resolution 7. This Declaration is an expression of the reasonable expectations of the City based on the facts and circumstances known to the City as of the date hereof. The anticipated original expenditures for the Project and the principal amount of the bonds described in paragraph 2 are consistent with the City’s budgetary and financial circumstances. No sources other than proceeds of bonds to be issued by the City are, or are reasonably expected to be, reserved, allocated on a long-term basis, or otherwise set aside pursuant to the City’s budget or financial policies to pay such Project expenditures. 8. This Declaration is intended to constitute a declaration of official intent for purposes of the Reimbursement Regulations. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by City Council Member _______________, and, after full discussion thereof and upon a vote being taken thereon, the following City Council Members voted in favor thereof: And the following City Council Members voted in opposition: Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4i Executive summary Title: Estoppel certificate for 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. Recommended action: Motion to approve an estoppel certificate for 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. Policy consideration: Does the city council agree to provide the estoppel certificate as contemplated in the city’s previous agreements with the owner? Summary: Sam’s Real Estate Business Trust is preparing to sell the Sam’s Club property located at 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. to Louisiana Crossing, LLC. The city received a request for documentation regarding compliance with previous City of St. Louis Park approvals and agreements associated with the property in the form of an estoppel certificate. The previous city agreements with the landowner contemplate providing documentation regarding compliance with the agreements upon request. The city attorney reviewed and approved the form of the proposed estoppel certificate. City staff reviewed the conditions contained in each document listed within and is not aware of any compliance issues with these agreements at the subject property. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Estoppel certificate Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting o f February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Title: Estoppel certificate for 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. ESTOPPEL C ERTIFICATE THIS ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE (this “Esto ppel Certificate”), is dated as of February 1, 2021, and is from the CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”), to BMO HARRIS BANK N.A., a national banking association (the “Lender”), and its successors and assigns. RECITALS: A. Lender contemplates making a term loan available to Louisiana Crossing, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (the “Borrower”) in the amount of $7,320,000.00 (the “Loan”), which Loan is secure d by, among other things, a Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Financing Statement dated of e ve n date he rewith, executed by Borrower in favor of the Lender encumbering the real property in Hennepin County, Minnesota legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Property”). B. The Property is encumbered by (i) that certain Development Agreement for Payment of Improvements in the Minnehaha Creek Watershe d dated as of August 18, 1986, record ed S ept emb er 6, 1988 as Docum ent No. 1957402 in the O ffice o f t he Registrar of Tit l es for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Watershed Development Agreement”) made by and between the City and Costco Wholesale Corporation, a Delaware corporation, as prior record owner of the Property; and (ii) that certain Amende d and Restated Development Contract dat ed M arch 17, 2006, r ecord ed May 15, 2006 as D ocum ent No. 4259976 in t he O ffice o f t he Registrar of Titles for Hennepin County, Minnesota (the “Development Contract”), made by and between the City and Sam’s Real Estate Business Trust, a Delaware statutory trust, as prior record o wner of the Property. C. The City understands that the Lender has required this Estoppel Certificate as a condition of making the Loan and that the Lender will rely on this Estoppel Certificate in connection therewith. NOW, THEREFORE, the City hereby agrees as follows: 1. Development Contract Effective. The Development Contract is in full force and effect in accordance with its terms. The Development Contract has not be en altered, amended, modified, changed, supplemented, terminated, canceled or superseded in any manner. 2. No Violation. The City is not aware of any violations of any of the restrictions, conditions, covenants and agreements under the Watershed Development Agreement or the Development Contract on the date hereof, and no event has occurred which, after the passage of tim e or expiration of any notice, grace or right to cure period provided for by law or in the Watershed Development Agreement or the Development Contract, would constitute a violation under the Watershed Development Agreement or the Development Contract. City council meeting o f February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4i) Page 3 Title: Estoppel certificate for 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. 3. No Claims. The City does not now have or hold any claim against the Property or the owner of the Property related to the Watershed Development Agreement or the Development Contract. [Remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] City council meeting o f February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4i) Page 4 Title: Estoppel certificate for 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Estoppel Certificate as of the date and year first written above. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, a Minnesota municipal corporation By: Name: Jake Spano Title: Mayor By: Name: Thomas K. Harmening Title: City Manager City council meeting o f February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4i) Page 5 Title: Estoppel certificate for 3745 Louisiana Ave. S. EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, Sams Club Addition except that portion described as follows: Beginning at the most westerly corner of said Lot 1; thence South 25 degrees 37 minutes 17 seconds East, assumed bearing, along the westerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 198.71 feet; thence North 64 degrees 23 minutes 38 seconds East, along said weste rly line 5.22 feet; thence northwesterly 74.82 feet along a non tangential curve, concave to the southwest, central angle 03 degrees 18 minutes 46 seconds, radius 1294.00 feet, chord bearing North 25 degrees 12 minutes 04 seconds West, chord length 74.81 feet; thence North 26 degrees 51 minutes 26 seconds West, along tangent, 105.66 feet; thence northwesterly 30.15 feet along a tangential curve, concave to the northeast, central angle 15 degrees 25 minutes 30 seconds, radius 112.00 feet to a point on the northwesterly line of said Lot 1; thence South 05 degrees 01 minutes 43 seconds West, along the westerly line of said Lot 1, a distance of 13.49 feet to the point of beginning. Torrens Property (Certificate of Title No. 1394349) Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Consent agenda item: 4j Executive summary Title: Approve consultant contract for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Pro ject (4022-6000) Recommended action: Motion to authorize execution of a professional services contract with Bolton & Menk Inc., in the amount of $229,444 to complete the preliminary plans for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project (4022-6000). Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to continue to implement our pavement management program? Summary: Staff is planning for construction of the 36th Street and Wooddale Ave nue Improvement Project in 2022. Give n workload and technical de mands, a consultant is n eede d to compl ete the preliminary design. A request for proposal (RFP) was sent to three consulting firms . If the project is approved to proceed to final design, the city will ent er into an additional contract for final design and construction administration services. Staff received three proposals. A summary is shown below: CONSULTANT BID AMOUNT Bolton & Menk, Inc. $229,444 WSB and Associates $175,151 SEH, Inc. $370,465 Staff evaluated each proposal and is recommending that a contract be awarded to Bolton & Menk Inc. for $229,444. The information contained in their proposal highlighted a comprehensive plan on how best to proceed with this design. They provided information beyond the other consultants showing their commitment to providing a quality project for the city. Based on staff’s knowledge of similar projects of this size, the cost submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. is consistent with prior proposals and it is reasonable given the scope of the work. For professional service contracts cities are not required to use the firm with the lowest proposed cost. Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the city’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for 2022. The project will be paid for using a combination of Tax Increment funds, Utility funds, and General Obligation Bonds (bikeway and sidewalks). Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion; Phasing map; Project map; 36th St . bikeway prelim. layout Prepared by: Joseph Shamla, sr. engineering project manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 2 Title: Approve consultant contract for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project (4022-6000) Discussion Background: The city council approved the preliminary layout of the 36th Street bikeway in 2019. Information regarding the bikeways was shared with the city council at the Sept. 23, 2019 study session, at the Oct. 7, 2019 public hearing and during the Oct. 21, 2019 council action to approve the preliminary layout. Staff started public engagement for this project in 2019. The primary focus of that engagement was the bicycle facility along Monterey Drive, Beltline Boulevard and 36th Street. See attached map for the phasing plan. • Phase 1 of the Monterey Drive , Beltline Boulevard , and 36th Street bike ways was constructed in 2020. • Phase 2 will be constructed in 2021 under a separate contract. • Phase 3 is a part of this project and will be constructed in 2022. In addition to bikeway construction, the following street segments will also be rehabilitate d in 2022. These roads have been selected due to poor pavement condition. • 36th Street from Alabama Avenue to Highway 100 northbound ramp intersection. • Wooddale Avenue from 36th Street to Highway 100. • Yosemite Avenue from 35th Street to 36th Street. • Xenwood Avenue from 35th Street to 36th Street. • 35th Street from Yosemite Avenue to Xenwood Avenue. Additional public engagement will occur on the overall project during preliminary plan design . 36th Street and Wooddale Ave nue Improvements: This project is scheduled for 2022. 36th Street has a traffic volume of 12,600 ADT, Wooddale Avenue’s volume is 6,000 ADT. These streets serve many residents and businesses. Both roads are Municipal State Aid , which makes them eligible for state gas tax dollars . The roads must be constructed to state aid standards to be eligible for using state aid funds in the future. The local streets, Yosemite Avenue, 35th Street, and Xenwood Avenue , are included in the project to take advantage of contract pricing and reduce the impacts to the public by working on them at the same time. Due to funding availability, TIF is being used to pay for most of this project. The 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project scope will include the following: • Pavement replacement on all streets within the project limits • Construction of the approved preliminary bicycle facility on 36th Street • New sidewalk construction along Yosemite Avenue , 35th Street, and Xenwood Avenue. This will close gaps in the sidewalk system and provide complete connections for the neighborhood north of Wooddale Avenue to get to the SWLRT Wooddale station. • Upsizing the sanitary sewer on 36th Street Present consideration: Staff is requesting that the city council approve a professional services contract to complete all preliminary aspects of the project and provide to the city a 30 percent plan. Another contract will be needed this fall to complete the final plans and construction administration. The final design scope will be defined upon completion of the 30 percent plans, which will allow the consultant to provide an accurate cost for the final design and construction administration. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Page 3 Title: Approve consultant contract for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project (4022-6000) A request for proposal (RFP) was sent to Bolton & Menk, Inc. WSB and Associates and SEH, Inc. The table below summarizes the cost submitted with each proposal. CONSULTANT BID AMOUNT Bolton & Menk, Inc. $229,444 WSB and Associates $175,151 SEH, Inc. $370,465 Staff evaluated each proposal and is recommending that a contract be awarded to Bolton & Menk Inc. for $229,444. The information contained in their proposal highlighted a comprehensive plan on how best to proceed with this design. They provided information beyond the other consultants showing their commitment to providing a quality project for the city. Based on staff’s knowledge of similar projects of this size, the cost submitted by Bolton & Menk, Inc. is consistent with prior proposals and it is reasonable given the scope of the work. Bolton & Menk has designed other projects in St. Louis Park with their most recent project on Cedar Lake Road between Louisiana Avenue and Park Place Boulevard. They also designed the project on Texas Avenue south of Highway 7. Proposed Schedule: The following is the proposed project schedule: Public engagement Summer 2021 Preliminary (30%) plans complete August 2021 Easement needs identified August 2021 60% plans complete October 2021 Final plans complete January 2022 Easement acquisition (if needed) February 2022 Private utility relocation April 2022 Construction May 2022 to November 2022 !( GWX GWX ?A@ 25 3 100 ZARTHANAVESPARK C E N TE R B L V D E X C E LS IO R BLVDSERVICE DR H I G H W A Y 7 RALEIGHAVESGRAND WAY 35TH ST W XENWOODAVESYOSEMITEAVESW O LFE PKWYSALEMAVESPARK C O M M O N S D RWO O D D A L E A VE XENWOODAVESW ALKERST36 1/2 STWYOSEMITEAVES PARK C O M M O N S D R GOODRICH AVE OXFORD ST LYNN AVE S HAMILTON ST 34TH ST WZARTHANAVES PRIVATE RDCAMERATA WAYWEBSTER AVE SMERID IAN LN 33RD ST W LYNNAVESWEBSTERAVESQUENTINAVESSER VI CE D R H I G H W A Y 7 YOSEMITEAVESWOODDALE AVE 33RD S T W P R IV A T E RDWEBSTERAVESUTICA AVES35TH ST W P A R K GL E N R D COUNTY ROA D 2 5 SERVIC ED R H IG H W A Y 7 0 500 1,000250 Feet ² Monterey DriveBeltline Boulevard& 36th StreetBikeway ImprovementsOverview Map 36TH ST W 2021 - BELTLINE BLVD2022 - 2 0 2 0 20 2 1 M O N T E R E Y D R Proposed Roundabout 2021 - 36TH ST W City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Title: Approve consultant contract for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project (4022-6000)Page 4 ?A@100 36TH ST W36THSTW WO O D D A L E A V E ALABAMAAVES35TH ST W XENWOODAVESGOODRICH AVE OXFORD ST 35TH ST W SERVI C E D R HI G H W A Y 7 RKCENTERBLVDWALKE R S T ZARTHANAVESYOSEMITEAVESMEDLEY ROWCAMERATA WAY WEBSTERAVESWEBSTERAVESPRIVATE RDPRIVATE RD 0 200 400100 Feet ´ 36th Street and Wooddale Ave improvement project Legend Stree PAt rehabilitation Street rehabilitation, Sanitary sewer upsizing, and bikeway installation Bikeway installation City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Title: Approve consultant contract for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project (4022-6000)Page 5 36TH STREET CONCEPT 8-20-19 New Dedicated Bike Facility New Multi-Use Trail Existing Multi-Use Trail New Concrete / Sidewalk Area Existing Concrete / Sidewalk Area New Road Pavement Existing Road Pavement Stop Sign Traffic Signal Bike Route Path NORTH 0 40 80 FT Wo o d d a l e A v e n u e Yosemite Avenue SHighway 7Xenwood Avenue SWebster Avenue SHighway 100 North BoundHighway 100 RampPark Center BoulevardRaleigh AvenueBeltline BoulevardM o n t e r e y D r i v e W 36 t h 1 / 2 S t r e e t Highway 100 South BoundW 36th Street W 36th Street Proposed Bicycle Facilities Between Xenwood Avenue S and Webster Avenue S Proposed Bicycle Facilities On bridge over Highway 100 Proposed Bicycle Facilities Between Wooddale Avenue and Yosemitte Avenue S 12’5’11’ 11’ 11’ 11’14’15’12’12’6’2’Varies12’11’ 11’6’ Begin westbound on- street bike facility Lane reduction to accommodate bike facility Proposed 2021 ConstructionTARGET HOIGAARD VILLAGE THE ELMWOOD APARTMENTS TOWER LIGHT BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY MICRO CENTER GOODWILL LA FITNESS US POSTAL SERVICE THE VERGE APARTMENTS ST. LOUIS PARK REC CENTER ROC MELROSE CENTER BASS LAKE PARK WOLFE PARK CITIZENS BANK New 3/4 access New 3/4 access New full accessNew curb reconstruction to accommodate bike facility Future SWLRT Work Future Wooddale Avenue SW LRT Station Cedar L a k e R e gi o n al Tr ail NORTHNORTHNORTHCity council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 4j) Title: Approve consultant contract for the 36th Street and Wooddale Avenue Improvement Project (4022-6000)Page 6 Meeting: City council Meeting date: February 1, 2021 Action agenda item: 8a Executive summary Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Recommended action: •Motion to adopt Resolution approving the amendments to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Plan Map, as well as related figures, tables, and text (requires five affirmative votes) ; and •Motion to adopt Resolution approving the preliminary and final plat for Edith Addition (requires four affirmative votes) ; and •Motion to approve Second Reading and adopt Ordinance adding Section 36-268-PUD 18 to the Zoning Code and amending the Zoning Map from C-1 Neighborhood Commercial and R-3 Two-Family Residential to PUD 18, and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication (requires five affirmative votes) Policy consideration: Does the proposed redevelopment meet the city’s affordable housing and neighborhood development goals? Does council approve waiving the two-acre minimum requirement for a planned unit development (PUD)? Summary: Paster Properties has applied for a comprehensive plan amendment, a preliminary and final plat, and a preliminary and final PUD. The applicant propose s Texa-Tonka Apartments, a new 101-unit, three to five -story multi-family building on the northeast corner of Texas Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard; and an 11-unit, two-story townhouse building south of 29th Stree t West . All units will be rental. The development includes 20% of the units affordable at 50% of area median income. The planning commission held a public hearing on Jan. 6, 2021 and voted six to zero to recommend approval of applications. The city council held a first reading of the PUD ordinance on Jan. 19, 2021 and voted unanimously to approve the rezoning and set a second reading for Feb. 1, 2021. Financial or budget considerations: The p roforma f or the Texa-Tonka Apartments e xhibits a v erifi ed f inancial gap which indicates that the development is not financially feasible without additional financial assistance. To offset this gap, the de veloper appli ed for tax increment financing (TIF) assistance to enable it to proceed. The EDA received a report on Jan. 11, 2021 outlining the request and recommende d level of assistance. The EDA will formally consider the TI F request in the coming months. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion; Comprehensive plan amendment resolution; Preliminary and final plat resolution; Draft PUD ordinance; PUD ordinance summary for publication; Draft planning commission minutes; Written public comments; Official exhibits; Site renderings Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Discussion Summary of request: Paster Properties propose s Texa-Tonka Apartments, a new 101-unit, three to five -story multi-family building on the northeast corner of Texas Ave nue and Minnetonka Boulevard ; and an 11-unit, two-story townhouse building south of 29th Street West. Both buildings are proposed to be on the same lot and all units will be rental. The apartment building includes amenity spaces, underground parking, enclosed parking at the first floor and surface parking on site with other site amenities. Both buildings include walk -up units for future residents. Tuck -under garages are provided within the townhomes. The developer also proposes a privately owned and privately maintained, but publicly accessible trail connection through the site connecting Texas Avenue to Rainbow Park. The development includes 20% of the units affordable at 50% of area median income. The applicant submitted three applications to facilitate development of the proposed project. They request a comprehensive plan amendment to change the future land use designation of the site from commercial and medium density residential to high density residential. They propose a preliminary and final plat approval that combines nine parcels into one lot and dedicates additional public right-of-way. And they are requesting approvals of a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD), which is a zoning map and zoning text amendment to create a new PUD zoning district specific to the property and proposed uses. Site information: City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Site area (acres): 1.86 acres Current use: Surrounding land uses: vacant 4,500-square foot commercial building, vacant parking lot, vacant residential lot North: 29th Street and single -family residential East: Rainbow Park and single -family residential South: Minnetonka Boulevard and commercial uses West: Texa-Tonka Shopping Center and single -family residential Current 2040 land use guidance Current zoning COM - commercial C-1 neighborhood commercial RM - medium density residential R-3 two -family residence Proposed 2040 land use guidance Proposed zoning RH - high density residential PUD planned unit development Background: The vacant parking lot located on the east side of Texas Avenue was constructed in the 1950s to provide overflow parking for the Texa-Tonka Shopping Center. The parking lot has been unused for several decades and has fallen into disrepair. The vacant one-story commercial building on the northeast corner of Minnetonka Boulevard and Texas Avenue has also been vacant or underutilize d for many years. Present considerations: The applicant requests that the city: 1.Amend the comprehensive plan 2040 land use map to change the future land use designation from commercial and medium density residential to high-density residential; 2.Approve a preliminary and final plat to combine nine parcels into one lot and dedicate additional right-of-way; and 3.Amend the zoning map and zoning ordinance to rezone the subject properties from C-1 neighborhood commercial and R-3 two -family residence to PUD p lan ned unit development. Zoning analysis: Comprehensive plan amendment: The applicant requests a change to the future land use designation of portions of the development site from COM – commercial and RM – medium density residential to RH – high density residential. Below is an excerpt from the city’s 2040 comprehensive plan future land use map. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 4 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments A request for amending the city ’s land use plan and zoning map should be evaluated from the perspective of land use planning principles and community goals. These reflect the community’s long-range vision and broad goals about what kind of community it wants to be and what makes strong neighborhoods. This amendment request is driven by a specific proposal for development. The request is for residential develop ment at a density of approximately 61 units per acre, which is considered high density (RH) in the comprehensive plan. The amendment may be evaluated independently of the development proposal against the goals of the comprehensive plan for the subject properties. The amendment itself does not permit the proposed development but is one step in the approvals process. General consistency with the comprehensive plan The city’s land use plan should reflect the broad goals, policies and implementation strategies incorporated in the comprehensive plan. These elements are the basis for evaluating the requested change. Livable Communities goal #2: Promote building and site design that creates a connected, human scale, multi-modal, and safe environment for people who live and work here. A.Encourage quality design in new construction such as building orientation, scale, massing and pedestrian access. B.Encourage new buildings to orient to walkable streets with appropriate building height to street width ratios. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 5 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Residential land use goal #1: Create a mix of residential land uses and housing types to increase housing choices, including affordable housing, and increase the viability of neighborhood services through redevelopment or infill development. A.Engage the community to determine how to allow a broader range of housing types and densities within and adjacent to existing low-density residential neighborhoods that are complementary and compatible with the existing neighborhood character. B.Promote and support the development of medium- and high-density residential land uses near commercial centers and nodes. C.Ensure that new and redeveloped medium- and high-density residential land uses are located within walking distance of transit and commercial services. D.Engage the community to explore how to increase the mix of housing types near transit corridors, parks and commercial nodes/corridors. Residential land use goal #2: Preserve and enhance the livability and unique character of each neighborhood’s residential areas. A.Promote maintenance and reinvestment of existing residential land uses that have experienced deferred maintenance, deteriorating property values, high vacancy rates, or reuse opportunities. B.Require the creation of appropriate and effective buffer or transition areas between different land use types. Commercial and office land use goal #3: Preserve, revitalize and foster neighborhood commercial nodes that provide essential neighborhood commercial services, unique neighborhood identity, and neighborhood gathering opportunities. B.Implement convenient pedestrian access to and within the neighborhood commercial nodes from adjacent neighborhoods and transit stops. E.Re -guide under-performing commercial nodes to medium- or high -density residential to encourage redevelopment. F.Prepare small area plans for commercial nodes and corridors where the appropriate future land uses are unclear, where significant changes are anticipated, and where additional guidance is needed. Housing goal #1: The City of St. Louis Park will promo te and facilitate a balanced and enduring housing stock that offers a continuum of diverse lifecycle housing choices suitable for households of all income levels including, but not limited to affordable, senior, multi- generational, supportive and mixed-income housing, disbursed throughout the city. A.Create a broad range of housing types to provide more diverse and creative housing choices to meet the needs of current and future residents. E.Use infill and redevelopme nt opportunities to assist in meeting housing goals. Housing goal #3 multi-family: The city is committed to promoting quality multi-family developments, both rental and owner occupied, in appropriate locations, including near transit centers, retail and employment centers and in commercial mixed-use districts. B.Promote high-quality architectural design in the construction of new multi-family developments. C.Be proactive in analyzing and guiding redevelopment opportunities for multi-family developments. D.Increase densities and housing options on high frequency transit routes and near rail stations. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 6 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Housing goal #4 rental housing: The city is committed to creating, preserving and improving the city’s rental housing stock. B.Promote the inclusion of family -sized units (two and three bedroom) in newly constructed multi- family developments. C.Minimize the involuntary displacement of people of color, indigenous people and vulnerable populations, such as low-income households, the elderly and people with disabilities from their communities as neighborhoods grow and change. Availability of infrastructure •Water and sewer: City engineering and operations staff reviewed the proposed development and find the public water and sewer infrastructure in the area to be adequate to serve the proposed development. •Traffic: The city completed a traffic study in 2019 as part of the small area planning for the Texa-Tonka commercial node which is attached to this report. The study analyzed the traffic impacts if all of Texa-Tonka were redeveloped with higher intensity commercial uses and 250 residential units. The study found that the full redevelopment of the commercial node would have little impact to the roadway operations and all intersections would all operate at a level of service B or better during peak hours of the day. A separate traffic study was not needed for the proposed Texa-Tonka Apartment development due to the minimal effects shown to the network even if all of the Texa- Tonka commercial node was to be redeveloped. This development proposal includes less than half the amount of the multi-family units that was studied in 2019. No changes will be necessary to the surrounding street network due to the proposed development. However, the city and county are planning to lower the Minnetonka Boulevard and Texas Avenue intersection approximately four feet to improve the sightlines at the intersection. The timeline of these improvements is to be determined as they are not yet included in the county’s five -year capital improvement plan. The development has been designed to respond to these planned improvements and right- of-way will be dedicated in order to accommodate the future intersection design adjacent to this property. •Stormwater: City engineering staff finds that the development complies with stormwater re quirements. The applicant will be required to obtain both city and Minnehaha Creek Watershed District permits prior to construction. Other relevant guidance documents: In 2019 the city completed a small area plan for the Texa- Tonka commercial area which anticipated redevelopment for this site to help guide development proposals and land use decisions. The plan is not a mandated design, rather it offers guidance and one example illustration to communicate building design, massing and community preferences to potential developers and city officials. The vision for the Texa-Tonka area, which was developed during a community workshop, states that “The Texa-Tonka commercial node is a vibrant, we lcoming place that offers a mix of small, local, useful shops, restaurants, services, and housing options. Its attractive places and spaces are connected by a safe, accessible network of landscaped streets, sidewalks and plazas where people of all ages and abilities can meet their daily needs by foot, bicycle transit and auto.” City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 7 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments The plan examined development scenarios for this development site including multi-family residential on the corner, and townhomes on the northern portion of the site. A survey was conducted to get reactions to the development scenarios, and most survey respondents were in favor of this type of development at this location. One of the scenarios for the northeast corner looked at a mixed -use building with approximately 3,000 square fe et of commercial and 34 residential units in a building that was two stories tall near Minnetonka, and three stories tall to the north to take advantage of the grade of the site. This scenario anticipated a curb cut on Minnetonka being used to access the site. 58% percent of survey responses (page 37) showed support for this development scenario. Those that opposed this option were concerned about more multi-family units and more traffic. Some people also opposed this option because they thought it was not dense enough. The plan also looked at a ten-unit townhome development on the northern end of the site. This development scenario was included in a community-wide survey (page 24), where 70.5% of respondents showed support for this type of development on the site. Of the 29% of people who were against it, only 8% explained why, and answers ranged between being too dense or not dense enough. The Texa-Tonka Small Area Plan also provides guidance on the design of future buildings with specifications for building form and character, building façade design, street frontage design, and site design. Typical characteristics of a Texa-Tonka building include interlocking or distinct volumes to break down the scale of longer buildings, celebrated entrances with plazas and porticos, ribbon and corner windows to express horizontality, simple and few materials, and modest setbacks that are enhanced with planters, landscaping or plazas. In addition, a traffic study (noted above) and market study were completed as part of the small area plan which both support a proposal of this scale. The market study said there is a high demand for both owner and renter occupied units in the Texa-Tonka market area. Impacts to surrounding properties and the physical character of the neighborhood Removal of the existing vacant buildings and vacant parking lot will change the character of the area that has been the same since the 1950s. However, the architect indicates the buildings’ design s were influenced by the recommendations of the city’s small area plan, including the City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 8 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments massing of the proposed buildings with the lower height along Minnetonka Boulevard and near the single -family uses to the north, as well as the building’s mid -century modern architecture. Some of the building’s brick details mimic other buildings within the Texa-Tonka area. Additionally, ground floor units along Minnetonka Boulevard and Texas Avenue will have individual entrances that are designed and landscaped to create a more walkable, comfortable, and active street front. Approving the comprehensive plan 2040 land use map amendment will allow for additional housing units, including affordable units, in an area that is well served by transit along Minnetonka Boulevard. The general area of the development proposal provides a mix of goods and services. Uses in the area include a commercial shopping center, a dentist office, and duplex uses to the west, single-family uses north of 29th Street, Rainbow Park and single -family uses to the east, and neighborhood commercial on the south side of Minnetonka Boulevard. The proposed development would provide a higher density apartment building at the northeast corner of Texas Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard across from the commercial uses, and two- story townhome uses, including affordable units, to the north. The buildings are scaled to step- down as they approach nearby single -family an d two-family properties to the north and east. The redevelopment would also help achieve the vision for the area as specified in the small area plan by reconstructing sidewalks along Texas Avenue, enhancing landscaping, providing active uses on the ground floor to activate the street frontages, and providing better access to public spaces including dedicated access from Texas Avenue to Rainbow Park via a trail connection. Staff finds the goals and policies of the 2040 comprehensive plan support guiding these properties for RH – high density residential land use. The Metropolitan Council must authorize placing the change into effect. This change is consistent with regional goals and policies and will like ly be well-received. Preliminary and final plat analysis: Paster Properties seeks preliminary and final plat approval to combine nine lots into one lot for the proposed redevelopment of a 101-unit multi-family building on the south side of the lot and 11 townhome units on the northern half of the lot. Lo ts: Lot 1, Block 1, Edith Addition will have a lot area of 79,061 square feet or 1.81 acres. The proposed residential density for the site is 61.9 units per acre. Easements: Drainage and utility easemen ts are provided along all property lines as per the requirements of the city’s subdivision ordinance. There is an existing six -foot utility easement along the eastern property line, and no changes are proposed to that easement. All additional easements abutting city right-of-way are ten feet in width. Right-of-way dedication: The city and county intend to lower the Texas Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard intersection approximately three to four feet. The timeline of these improvements is to be determined as it is not yet included in the county’s five -year capital improvement plan . The development has been designed to accommodate these improvements, and 1,152 square feet right-of-way will be dedicated facilitating the future intersection design. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 9 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Park dedication: The parks and recreation advisory commission (PRAC) reviewed the park and trail dedications for the proposed development on December 2, 2020. PRAC recommended park dedication fees in lieu of land for all new residential units and constructing a publicly accessible trail connection to Rainbow Park in lieu of the trail fee. The 2021 fee schedule sets the residential park dedication fee at $1,500 per dwelling unit. At 112 units the fee totals $168,000. Staff finds the preliminary and final plat meet city requirements. PUD analysis: Description: The developer requests approval of a preliminary and final planned unit development (PUD). A PUD is a rezoning and zoning text amendment that establishes the regulations for a specific property. The site is currently zoned C-1 neighborhood commercial and R-3 t wo-family residential. The 1.86-acre site is smaller than the required two acres for a PUD. City council has the authority to waive this requirement. City council indicated support for a PUD approach for this property in January 2020 because it allows fo r conditions and requirements that fit the context and character of the individual site and the area. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 10 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Building and site design analysis: Texa-Tonka Apartments meets the PUD ordinance goals for building and site design. The ordinance requires the city to find that the quality of building and site design proposed will substantially enhance aesthetics of the site and implement relevant goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. In addition, the following criteria shall be satisfied: (1) The design shall consider the project as a whole and shall create a unified environment within project boundaries by ensuring architectural compatibility of all structures, efficient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, aesthetically pleasing landscape and site features, and design and efficient use of utilities. Staff finds the plan meets this requirement. (2) The design of a PUD shall achieve compatibility of the project with surrounding land uses, both existing and proposed, and shall minimize the potential adverse impacts of the PUD on surrounding land uses and the potential adverse effects of the surrounding land uses on the PUD. Staff finds these criteria will be met. (3) A PUD shall comply with the City’s Green Building Policy. This criterion will be met. The de velopment intends to use MN Green Communities criteria and use the Energy Design Assistance program to meet the requirements of the policy. (4) The use of green roofs or white roofs and on-site renewable energy is encouraged. The multi-family building in cludes rooftop solar energy installation generating a minimum 26 KW. This criterion will be met. (5) A PUD shall comply with the city’s Inclusionary Housing Policy. The development will include 20 percent of the units available at 50 percent area median income. This is more than double the number of affordable units required by the city’s inclusionary housing policy. This criterion will be met. Zoning analysis: The following table provides the development metrics. The property will be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). The proposed performance and development standards, as indicated in the development plans, establish the development requirements for this property if approved. Zoning Compliance Table. Factor Required Proposed Met? Use Residential Residential Yes Lot Area 2.0 acres required unless supported by council 1.86 acres Council voiced support January 2020 Yes Building Materials Minimum 60% Class I materials on all facades. 10% of fiber cement siding can be counted toward the Class I requirements. Apartment East: 68% West: 61% South: 71% North: 60% Townhome East: 64% West: 73% South: 69% North: 77% Yes City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 11 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Dwelling Units No requirement. Affordable housing: 10% of the units affordable at 50% area median income H ousing TIF district: 20% of the units affordable at 50% area median income Proposed 112 20% of the units affordable at 50% area median income Yes Density (units per acre) High Density Residential Max allowed: 75 per acre 61.9 units per acre Yes Off-Street Parking 1 space per bedroom Total required: 134 Total provided: 138 Surface: 42 Interior garage: 73 Townhome garage: 18 On-Street: 5 Yes EV charging Stations 10% level 1 EVSE (14 stalls) 1 level 2 EVSE Conduit for 10% future level 2 EVSE Provided: 9 level 1 spaces 12 level 2 spaces Conduit for 7 additional level 2 spaces Yes Bicycle Parking 1 per dwelling unit plus 1 per 10 automobile spaces . Total required: 126 Total Provided: 126 Yes Open Area/ DORA No specific percentage with PUD 17.1% Yes Landscaping See Landscaping section Replacement diameter: 339.6 caliper inches New required: Trees: 112 Shrubs: 653 Replacement provided: 120 caliper inches plus fee payment to city tree fund. Provided: Trees: 46.5 Shrubs: 253 Alternative landscaping will be pursued, such as public art to satisfy this requirement. Yes Uses: Texa-Tonka Apartments is a single-phased residential development with a multi-family building and 11 townhome units. The units include a combination of studio, alcove, one bedroom, one bedroom + den, two bedroom, and two bedroom + den uses. The breakdown of unit type by building is as follows: Unit Type Summary Building Studio Alcove 1 bed 1bed+ 2bed 2bed+ TOTALS Market Rate Multifamily 8 21 40 1 9 2 81 Townhomes 1 8 9 Affordable Multifamily 2 5 10 1 2 20 Townhomes 2 2 Total Units 10 26 51 2 21 2 112 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 12 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Architectural design: The buildings have been designed to adhere to the city’s Texa-Tonka Small Area Plan design guidelines which states the following: •Building character: buildings in Texa-Tonka should complement, but not mimic, mid- century modern design traditions in terms of building and roof forms, materials, clean lines, and minimal ornamentation •Transitions: buildings and sites in Texa-Tonka should carefully address their transition to nearby residential buildings or other sensitive edges. Building should position taller portions of a structure away from neighboring buildings of lower scale, step back to align building setbacks of neighboring buildings, and provide appropriate buffering. •Massing: building massing in Texa-Tonka should vary across the district with each block supporting architectural variety. Typical buildings should be simple volumes, or interlocking volumes if they exceed 80’ in length to reduce the overall scale of the building massing from the street. •Scale: buildings in Texa-Tonka should establish a sense of human scale. Vertical and horizontal articulation can be used to reduce the apparent scale of larger buildings and create visual interest. Adjacent buildings of varying heights and styles should align design features to express a scale relationship between the two buildings. A dditionally, the applicant complies with the city’s architectural material standards with a minimum of 60% class I materials on all facades of the building including brick, glass and fiber cement siding. Per code fiber cement siding is allowed to be counted up to 10% as a class I material on each facade. Height: The buildings range in height from three stories (33’) to five stories (60’) for the multi- family structure and two story (24’) townhomes. The multi-family building’s height has been designed to be three stories facing Minnetonka Boulevard and the neighboring single -family homes to the east with a fourth story stepped back to reduce the building massing. Due to significant grade ch anges on the site, the four-story building becomes a five-story building to the north. The uppermost story of the building is stepped back further along the south and west facades to reduce the visual scale of the building. The two-story townhomes have been designed to be similar to the scale and setbacks of the surrounding single-family and two -family homes along Texas Avenue and 29th Street, and to provide a transitional buffer between the apartment building and the single-family uses to the north. Access: All v ehicular access is provided off Texas Avenue. The proposed redevelopment removes a large curb cut along Minnetonka Boulevard, and combines five curb cuts on Texas Avenue into one driveway for the development. This driveway is used to access the development’s surface and structured parking. Pedestrian access is provided via six -foot-wide sidewalks along all public rights -of-way. There is a six -foot wide boulevard between the sidewalk and the street along most of Texas Avenue and along 29th Stree t. An eight-foot wide, privately owned and maintained, but publicly accessible trail connection is also provided through the middle of the site to Rainbow Park, linking the neighborhood with the Texa-Tonka commercial node. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 13 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments No changes are proposed to the on-street bike lane along Texas Avenue. Parking: City code requires 134 parking spaces based on one parking space per bedroom. A total of 138 parking spaces are provided on-street along 29th Street West, in surface lots, and in parking garages. No on-street parking will be permitted on Texas Avenue. Electric vehicle parking: The development exceeds the city’s electric vehicle parking ordinance. A total of nine level-one spaces and 12 leve l two spaces will be provided. Additional conduit will be provided for seven future level two spaces. Bicycle parking: 126 bicycle parking spaces are required and 126 spaces are provided. Bicycle parking is located near building entrances, in a bicycle storage room within the structured parking, and near the dog run located along the eastern property line. Landscaping: A total of 339.6 caliper inches of significant trees are being removed from the site. 120 caliper inches will be replanted as part of the development. The developer will be required to pay the difference of 219.6 caliper inches into the city’s tree fund at a rate of $140 per caliper inch ($30,744). The landscape plan indicates 41 new canopy trees, three new ornamental trees, four new e vergreen trees, 253 new shrubs, and new perennials throughout the site. The project does not meet the city’s planting and tree replacement requirements. Code allows for alternative landscaping measures in order to meet the intent of the landscape ordinance including but not limited to outdoor fireplaces, outdoor space located on the roof and public art. Staff will work with the developer to ensure the development meets the intent of the ordinance as the outdoor spaces are further refined. Inclusionary housing policy: In 2019, city council amended the inclusionary housing policy to require any residential development that requires a comprehensive plan amendment or a planned unit development rezoning, adhere to the city’s inclusionary housing policy. The required breakdown is 20 percent of units at 60 percent area median income (AMI), ten percent of units at 50 percent AMI, or five percent of units at 30 percent AMI. The developer can choose what percentage of affordability they would like to provide. The developer has also applied for city financial assistance through the utilization of a housing Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district. A housing TIF district requires at least 20 percent of the units be available at 50 percent AMI per Minnesota state statute . The proposed development will exceed the requirements of the city’s inclusionary housing policy and will meet the requirements for a Housing TIF district with 20 percent of the units available at 50 percent AMI. As per the inclusionary housing policy, these units will be spread evenly across all units types throughout both buildings. Racial equity and inclusion: The community area surrounding the proposed development is one of the most diverse in the city, with the highest number of people of color per acre. The community also includes some of the lowest median income households and the highest percentage of renters in the city. Very little private investment has occurred in this area during City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 14 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments the last several decades. This development, along with Paster Properties’ recent renovation of the adjacent Texa-Tonka Shopping Center, provides opportunities for further investment in these communities. Outreach activities conducted as part of the city’s small area plan process included opportunities to gather input from existing renters, people of color, and non-native English speakers to obtain ideas on what community members would like to see in the project area. The development will provide a variety of housing types at market rate and at 50% of AMI to create more housing options for local residents within the project area for 25 years. Additionally, the site is located on a frequent bus route with service to downtown and large employers, and near the Cedar Lake Regional Trail, offering quick non-motorized transportation to downtown and recreational opportunities. Climate Action Plan: The buildings will adhere to the city’s Green Building Policy and will be designed to Green Communities criteria. Sustainability features include: a solar panel installation g enerating a minimum of 26 KW, enhanced insulation and air tightness for energy efficiency, Energy Star appliances and energy efficient mechanical systems, water sense fixtures, drought tolerant plantings and efficient irrigation, and low VOC paints and materials. Additionally , the development exceeds the city’s requirements for electric vehicle charging stations by providing 12 level two charging stations and conduit for an additional seven level two stations. The development is located on Metro Transit’s high frequency bus Route 17 and Route 667 Express. The site is also located near the North Cedar Lake Regional Multi-Use Trail. These amenities reduce the need for single -occupancy vehicles and vehicle miles traveled to reduce vehicle emissions. Neighborhood meeting: A virtual neighborhood meeting was held on November 19, 2020. Approximately 35 people attended the meeting. Concerns were expressed over the proposed height and density, as people preferred a three -story building, similar to what was shown in the small area plan. There were some concerns about increased traffic, and questions about site lighting and safety for future residents. Some folks did not like the architecture and would like to see the townhomes with a pitched roof design. Questions were asked about road closures during construction and making sure that Texas Avenue remains accessible. There were some questions about the approval process, with some people under the impression that the development was already approved. There were also comments from people stating that they support the development, and many comments applauding the developer’s improvements to the Texa-Tonka Shopping Center. The meeting was recorded and posted to the city’s website. At the time of this report the meeting was viewed 45 times. Planning Commission meeting: The planning commission held a virtual public hearing on Jan. 6, 2021 and voted six to zero to recommend the applications for the Texa-Tonka Apartments. The commission felt that the proposal incorporates the visions and goals of the Texa-Tonka small are a plan and that the building does a good job of stepping down in massing as it approaches the adjacent uses. The commission also voiced support for the various housing types, affordable units and sustainable features including so many electric vehicle charging stations. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 15 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Four residents called into the meeting to express their comments, though there were some technical difficulties with the quality of the caller audio. The commission took all of the calls that were received, and were able to understand the topics covered, but hearing every word was difficult. The planning commission requests city council have a call-in line during the meeting on January 19 so people may call again and be heard more clearly , if they desire . Three callers opposed the development and expressed concerns regarding construction noise, off-site overflow parking occurring on Sumter Avenue, dislike for the height of the building, concerns about increased taxes and additional traffic. One caller voiced support for the proposal but stated that she would prefer a three-story building and more affordable units. Additionally, seven comments of support and three comments of opposition were emailed to staff before to the public hearing. Those emails were shared with the commission prior to their meeting. Staff followed up the morning of January 7 via email with callers who voiced concerns over the meeting’s audio, apologizing for the technical issues, letting them know they could submit their comments in writing and sharing the location of call-in information for the city council meeting. One caller was not able to be heard at all and staff called and emailed the caller to follow up. Additionally, a second mailing was sent to all property owners within 500 feet on January 8 notifying them that city council will accept additional testimony during the January 19 meeting, and that additional written testimony could be submitted. Public process: Due to the technical issues during the January 7 public hearing, the planning commission requested city council take additional testimony. City council had a phone line open during the January 19 city council meeting, and there were no additional callers. City council voted unanimously to approve the First Reading of the PUD Ordinance and set the Second Reading of the ordinance for February 1, 2021. All written testimony received by staff has been included as an attachment to this report. All of the speakers who provided comments during the public hearing have also submitted their comments in writing. Additional comments: Staff has also been in contact with several residents both in favor and opposed to the development, but those conversations have not been submitted as part of the official record. One resident suggested additional trees be planted on the west side of Rainbow Park to help provide a greater buffer between the proposed development and the homes on Sumter Avenue. The city’s natural resource coordinator said he will plant 3 to 4 additional evergreen trees on the western side of Rainbow Park adjacent to the proposed fence. Pre sent considerations: Staff recommends the following: •Staff recommends approval of the Texa-Tonka Apartments Comprehensive Plan Amendment. •Staff recommends the approval of the Edith Addition Preliminary and Final Plat subject to the conditions listed in the resolution of approval. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 16 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments •Staff recommends approval of the Texa-Tonka Apartments Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development provided the following requirements are included in the planning development contract: 1.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 2.A ll utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off -site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 3.Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a.Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. b.A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and City representatives. c.All necessary permits shall be obtained. 4.Prior to issuance of building permits, the following conditions shall be met: a.The developer shall sign the City's Assent Form and the Official Exhibits. b.A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the Developer and City that addresses, at a minimum: i.The conditions of PUD approval as applicable or appropriate. ii.Alternative landscaping requirements. iii.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, trail and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. iv.Easements related to electronic communication and fiber infrastructure. v.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times of the costs of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. vi.Access agreement providing permanent public ingress and egress to Rainbow Park via a trail connection. vii.The developer shall reimburse City attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final PUD approval. i.The Mayor and City Manage r are authorized to execute said Planning Development Contract. c.Final construction plans for all public improvements and private stormwater system shall be signed by a registered engineer and submitted to the City Engineer for review and approval. d.Buildin g material samples and colors shall be submitted to the City for review and approval. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 17 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments 5.The developer shall comply with the following conditions during construction: a.All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Monday through Friday, and between 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. on weekends and holidays. b.The site shall be kept free of dust and debris that could blow onto neighboring properties. c.Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d.The City shall b e contacted a minimum of 72 hours prior to any work in a public street. e.Work in a public street shall take place only upon the determination by the City Engineer (or designee) that appropriate safety measures have been taken to ensure motorist and pedestrian safety. f.The developer shall install and maintain chain link security fencing that is at least six feet tall along the perimeter of the site. All gates and access points shall be locked during non-working hours. g.Temporary electric power connections shall not adversely impact surrounding neighborhood service. 6.Prior to the issuance of any permanent certificate of occupancy permit the following shall be completed: a.Public improvements, private utilities, site landscaping and irrigation, and storm water management system shall be installed in accordance with the Official Exhibits. 7.All mechanical equipment shall be fully screened. Rooftop equipment may be located as indicate d in the Official Exhibits so as not to be visible from off -site. 8.The materials used in, and placement of, all signs shall be integrated with the building design and architecture. Next steps: A report was sent to the EDA on January 11, 2021 detailing the TIF request, and the EDA will consider Paster Properties TIF application in the next few months. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 18 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution supporting the approval of an amendment to the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for the City of St. Louis Park under Minnesota Statues 462.351 for the property located at 7916 Minnetonka Boulevard, 2901, 2907, 2913, 2917, 2921, 2925, 2929, and 2939 Texas Avenue South Whereas, the 2040 Comprehensive Plan was adopted by the City Council on August 5, 2019; and Whereas, the use of said Plan will insure a safer, more pleasant, and more economical environment for residential, commercial, industrial, and public activities and will promote the public health, safety and general welfare ; and Whereas, said Plan will prepare the community for anticipated desirable change, thereby bringing about significant savings in both private and public expenditures; and Whereas, said Plan has taken due cognizance of the planning activities of adjacent units of government; and Whereas, said Plan is to be periodically reviewed by the City of St. Louis Park Planning Commission and amendments made, if justified according to procedures, rules, and laws, and provided such amendments would provide a positive result and are consistent with other provisions in the Comprehensive Plan; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park Planning Commission held a public hearing and recommended adoption of an amendment to said Plan on January 6, 2021; and Whereas, the City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission; and Whereas, the contents of Planning Case File 20-26-CP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case; and Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of St. Louis Park that said Plan, as previously adopted by the City Council, is hereby amended as follows and as shown in the attached exhibits: Change the future land use designation for the property at 7916 Minnetonka Boulevard and 2939, 2929, and 2925 Texas Avenue from COM – Commercial to RH – High Density Residential, and 2901, 2907, 2913, 2917, and 2921 Texas Avenue from RM – Medium Density Residential to RH – High Density Residential, and Changes to the text, tables and figures within the 2040 Comprehensive Plan document as shown in the attachme nts to reflect updates to city forecasts and development phasing City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 19 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments based on the change in land use; changes within the document are found on the following pages: 5-126 and 5-129. Now therefore be it further resolved, City staff are instructed to submit the Comprehensive Plan Amendment to the Metropolitan Council for review and authorization to place the Comprehensive Plan Amendment into effect. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 20 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments 5-126: Figure 5-5. 2040 Future Land Use Map City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 21 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments 5—129: Table 5.2 2040 Future land use Plan Future Land Use Gross Acres Net Acres % Net RL - Low Density Residential 2,520.67 2,484.21 35.96% RM - Medium Density Residential 397.26 396.31 381.00 380.05 5.51% 5.50% RH – High Density Residential 215.89 217.75 207.25 209.11 3.00% 3.03% MX - Mixed Use 52.81 52.81 0.76% TOD - Transit Oriented Development 81.76 81.76 1.18% COM - Commercial 256.32 255.41 255.99 255.08 3.71% 3.69% OFC - Office 232.31 215.16 3.11% BP - Business Park 103.81 103.65 1.50% IND - Industrial 237.82 199.64 2.89% CIV - Civic 216.29 210.7 3.05% PRK - Park and Open Space 916.67 557.54 8.07% ROW - Right of Way 1,517.14 1,508.78 21.84% RRR - Railroad 159.98 150.81 2.18% Water/Wetlands - 499.45 7.23% Total 6,908.74 6,908.74 100.00% City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 22 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Resolution No. 21-____ Resolution approving preliminary and final plat of Edith Addition 7916 Minnetonka Boulevard, 2901, 2907, 2913, 2917, 2921, 2925, 2929, and 2939 Texas Avenue S outh . Whereas, Texa-Tonka Apartments LLC submitted an application for approval of preliminary and final plat in the manner required for platting land under the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, and all proceedings have been duly had thereunder; and Whereas, the proposed preliminary and final plat has been found to be in all respects consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park; and Whereas, the proposed plat is situated upon lands in Hennepin County, Minnesota, legally described in “Exhibit A” attached hereto. Now therefore be it resolved the proposed preliminary and final plat of Edith Addition is hereby approved and accepted by the City as being in accord and conformity with all ordinances, City plans and regulations of the City of St. Louis Park and the laws of the State of Minnesota, provided, however, that this approval is made subject to the opinion of the City Attorney and Certification by the City Clerk and subject to the following conditions: 1.The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the conditions of this ordinance, approved Official Exhibits, and City Code. 2.All utility service structures shall be buried. If any utility service structure cannot be buried (i.e. electric transformer), it shall be integrated into the building design and 100% screened from off -site with materials consistent with the primary façade materials. 3.P rior to the City signing and releasing the final plat to the developer for filing with Hennepin County: a.A financial security in the form of a cash escrow or letter of credit in the amount of $1,000 shall be submitte d to the city to ensure that a signed Mylar copy of the final plat is provided to the city. b.A Planning Development Contract shall be executed between the city and developer that addresses, at a minimum: ii.The installation of all public improvements including, but not limited to: sidewalks, boulevards, trail and the execution of necessary easements related to such improvements. iii.A performance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrevocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park in the amount of 1.25 times the estimated costs for the installation of all public improvements (sidewalks and boulevards), placement of iron City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 23 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments monuments at property corners, and the private site stormwater management system and landscaping. iv. The applicant shall reimburse City Attorney’s fees in drafting/reviewing such documents as required in the final plat approval. v. The Mayor and City Manager are authorized to execute the Planning Development Contract. c. Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. 4. Prior to starting any land disturbing activities, the following conditions shall be met: a. The developer shall pay to the city the park dedication fee of $156,000 for residential uses and a contract shall be executed allowing permanent public ingress and egress to Rainbow Park via a trail connection through the site in lieu of a trail dedication fee. b. Proof of recording the final plat shall be submitted to the City. c. Assent Form and Official Exhibits shall be signed by the applicant and property owner. d. A preconstruction meeting shall be held with the appropriate development, construction, private utility, and city representatives. e. All necessary permits shall be obtained. f. A perf ormance guarantee in the form of cash escrow or irrev ocable letter of credit shall be provided to the City of St. Louis Park for all public improvements (street, sidewalks, boulevards, utility, streetlights, landscaping, etc.) and landscaping. 5. The on-site underground storm water management systems shall be privately - owned and privately maintained. Access to the system shall be provided to the city for clean -out and inspection purposes when warranted. Access points shall be covered by a drainage and utility easement, as provided on the final plat. 6. The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. It is further resolved The City Clerk is hereby directed to supply two certified copies of this Resolution to the above -named owner and subdivider, who is the applicant herein. The Mayor and City Manager are hereby authorized to execute all contracts required herein, and the City Clerk is hereby directed to execute the certificate of approval on behalf of the City Council upon the said plat when all of the conditions set forth have been fulfilled. Such execution of the certificate upon said plat by the City Clerk, as required under Section 26- 123(1)j of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code, shall be conclusive showing of proper compliance therewith by the subdivider and City officials charged with duties above described and shall entitle such plat to be placed on record forthwith without further formality. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 24 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the He nnepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 25 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Exhibit “A” Legal Descriptions Lo ts 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. Lo t 6, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, except that part included within the North 120 feet of the South 283 feet of that part of the South one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 8, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the West line of East Texa-Tonka Addition. That part of Lot 6, Block 1, Te xa-Tonka 5th Addition included within the North 120 feet of the South 283 feet of that part of the South one -half of the Southwest one -quarter of the Southwest one -quarter of Section 8, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the West line of East Texa-Tonka Addition. Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 7 then East to the Southeast corner thereof, then North 89.5 feet, then West 47 feet, then North 26.5 feet, then West 20.5 feet, then South 13 feet, then West 16.5 feet, then South 30 feet, then West 46 feet, then South 73.5 feet to beginning, Lot 7, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, excepting therefrom: All that part of Lot 7, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, lying Southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said lot distant 15 feet East of the Southwest corner of said lot, to a point on the West line of said lot distant 15 feet North of said Southwest corner. Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 7, then South 56.5 feet, then East 46 feet, then North 30 feet, then East 16.5 fe et, then North 13 feet, then East 20.5 feet, then South 26.5 f eet, then East 47 feet, then North 40.5 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 7, then West to beginning, Lot 7, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 26 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Ordinance amending the St. L ouis P ark City Code relating to zoning by creating Section 36-268-PUD 18 as a Planned Unit Development Zoning District f or the property located at 7916 Minnetonka Boulevard, 2901, 2907, 2913, 2917, 2921, 2925, 2929, and 2939 Texas Avenue South. The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: S ection 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning commission (Case No. 20-28-PUD) for amending the Zoning Ordinance Section 36-268-PUD 18. Section 2. The city council voted on January 19, 2021 to approve Resolution No. ____ amending the 2040 Comprehensive Plan and the future land use de signation for the subject prop erty locat ed a t 2901, 2907, 2913, 2917, and 2921 from M edium Density Resid ential to High Density Resid ential and a m ending 2925, 2929, 2939 Texas Avenue S and 7916 Minnetonka Boulevard from Commercial to High Density Residential. Said comprehensive plan amendments are associate d with this ordinance and require Metropolitan Council review and authorization to put it into effect. S ection 3. The Zoning Map shall be amended by reclassifying the following described lands from R-3 Two -Family Residence and C-2 Neighborhood Commercial to PUD 18: Lot 1, Block 1, Edith Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota S ection 4. The St. Louis Park Ordinance Code Section 26-268 is hereby amended to add the following Planned Unit Development Zoning District: S ection 26-268-PUD 18 (a)Development Plans The site located on property legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Edith Addition, He nnepin County, Minnesota, shall be developed, used and maintained in conformance with the following Final PUD signed Official Exhibits: 1.Preliminary Plat 2.Final Plat 3.C000 Cover sheet 4.V100 Survey 5.C100 General notes 6.C200 Tree inventory and preservation plan 7.C201 Demo plan 8.C300 Erosion and sediment control plan – phase 1 9.C301 Erosion and sediment control plan – phase 2 10.C302 Erosion and sediment control details 11.C303 SWPPP 12.C400 Site plan Ordinance No. ____-21 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 27 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments 13.C600 Storm sewer plan 14.C700 Utility plan 15.C800 Construction details 16.C801 Cons truction details 17. C802 Construction details 18.C803 Construction details 19.L100 Landscape plan 20.L101 Landscape enlargement – north 21.L102 Landscape enlargement – south 22.L103 Landscape schedule 23.L104 Landscape details 24.L105 DORA plan 25.Photometric plan 26.Shadow study 27.Townh ome floor plans – Leve ls 1 & 2 28.Townhome elevations 29.South building floor plans – Level -1 30.South building floor plans – Level 1 31.South building floor plans – Level 2-3 32.South building floor plans – Level 4 33.Building elevations 34.Renders – corner view 35.Renders – driveway view 36.Renders – townhome view The Site shall also conform to the following requirements: 1.The property shall be developed with 112 residential units a.101 units shall be provided in a multi-family building on the south side of the site. b.11 townhome u nits shall be provided on the north side of the site. 2.At least 134 off street -parking spaces shall be constructed and at least 4 on- street parallel parking spaces shall be provided on 29th Street West. 3.The maximum height shall be as follows: a.The height adjacent to single-family residential shall adhere to Section 36- 32(c)(3)a. b.The height of the multi-family building shall not exceed 62 feet and five storie s (5) stories. c.The height of the townhome buildings shall not exceed 25’ feet and two (2) stories. 4.The site shall contain a minimum of 12 percent designed outdoor recreation area. (b)Uses 1.Permitted uses. The following uses are permitted in PUD 18: a.Multiple-family dwellings. Uses associated with the multiple -family dwellings, including but not limited to, the residential office, fitness facility, mail room, assembly room or general amenity space. 2.Accessory uses: Accessory uses are as follows: City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 28 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments a.Home occupations complying with all of the conditions in the R-C district. b. Gardens. c.Parking lots. d.Public transit stops/shelters. e.Outdoor seating, public address (PA) systems are prohibited. f.Outdoor uses and outdoor storage are prohibited. g.Accessory utility structures including: i.Small wind energy conversion system as defined in 36-4 Definitions. ii.Solar energy systems. A solar energy system with a supporting framework that is either place on, or anchored in, the ground and that is independent of any building or other structure; or that is affixed to or an integral part of a principal or accessory building, including but not limited to photovoltaic or hot water solar energy systems which are contained within roofing materials, windows, skylights, and awnings. iii.Cisterns and rainwater collection systems. (c)Special Performance Standards 1.All general zoning requirements not specifically addressed in this ordinance shall be met, including but not limited to: outdoor lighting, architectural design, landscaping, parking, and screening requirements. 2.All trash, garbage, waste materials, trash containers, and recycling containers shall be kept in the manner required by this Code. All trash handling and loading areas shall be screened from view within a waste enclosure. 3.Signage shall be allowed in conformance with the R-C High Density Multiple - Family Residence Zoning District and shall comply with the following: a.Pylon signs shall be prohibited. 4.Awnings. a.Awnings shall be constructed of heavy canvas fabric, metal and/or glass. Plastic and vinyl awnings are prohibited. b.Backlit awnings shall be prohibited. S ection 5. The con tents of Planning Case File 20-26-CP, 20-27-S, 20-28-PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Section 6. This ordinance shall take effect upon Metropolitan Council authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment approved by Resolution No. ____ and not sooner than 15 days after publication. First reading January 19, 2021 Second reading February 1, 2021 Date of publication February 11, 2021 Date ordinance takes effect Upon Metropolitan Council Authorization of the associated comprehensive plan amendment and no sooner than February 26, 2021. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 29 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Thomas K. Harmening, city manage r Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 30 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Summary for Publication Ordinance No. ____-21 An ordinance creating a new planned unit development zoning district 7916 Minnetonka Boulevard, 2901, 2907, 2913, 2917, 2921, 2925, 2929, and 2939 Texas Avenue South. This ordinance states that the zoning map shall be amended for the properties at 2901, 2907, 2913, 2917, and 2921 from R-3 Two-Family Residential and 2925, 2929, 2939 Texas Avenue S and 7916 Minnetonka Boulevard from C-1, neighborhood commercial to PUD 18; and the Zoning Code Section 36-268 will be amended to add Section 36-268-PUD 18. This ordinance shall take effect no sooner than 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council February 1, 2021 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: February 11, 2021 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 31 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments EXCERPT OFFICIAL MINUTES PLANNING COMMISSION ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA January 6, 2021 – 6:25 p.m. COUNCIL CHAMBERS MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Beneke, Imran Dagane, Matt Eckholm, Courtney Erwin, Jessica Kraft, Tom Weber MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Jacquelyn Kramer, Gary Morrison, Sean Walther 1. Call to Order – Roll Call 2. Approval of Minutes of December 2, 2020 Commissioner Weber made a motion to approve the minutes. Commissioner Eckholm seconded the motion, and the motion passed on a vote of 6-0. 3. Public Hearings A. Texa-Tonka Apartments Applicant: Texa-Tonka Apartments LLC/Paster Properties Case Nos: 20-26-CP, 20-27-S, 20-28-PUD Jennifer Monson, planner, presented the staff report. She explained the applicant is requesting a comprehensive plan amendment, preliminary and final plat and preliminary and final PUD and noted these requests in detail. Ms. Monson stated staff recommends approval subject to conditions recommended by staff. Commissioner Weber asked about utility construction and traffic in the area and at the Minnetonka and Texas intersection. He also asked if there is a buffer between the proposed residential doors facing Minnetonka Boulevard and the public sidewalk. Ms. Monson stated the developers will need to obtain permits for work in the right-of- way and that typically lanes are not permitted to shut down entirely. She added that there is a grade change and ample landscaping between the residential units and the public sidewalk. Sean Walther added the right-of-way dedication provides enough space to accommodate a future right-hand turn lane and a bike lane. Commissioner Beneke asked if this will be 20% affordable housing and that would allow developer to apply for tax increment financing (TIF) funds. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 32 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Ms. Monson stated there are multiple ways for TIF to be approved, including a redevelopment district or a TIF housing district. A housing TIF district requires 20% of the housing units to be affordable to households earning up to 50% of the area median income (AMI). Commissioner Eckholm asked what the cost will be for the townhomes. Mr. Sturdivant, the applicant, clarified the townhomes will not be for sale; they will rented, and indicated the final rental rates have not been determined as the project will not be delivered to the market until 2022. He also stated some of the units will be affordable at 50% AMI and the remainder will be at market rate, depending on the market. Chair Kraft asked how the development responds to the small area plan for Texa Tonka and fits in with community feedback. Ms. Monson stated the plan showed a 3-story building on the site with 18,000 square feet commercial as well as townhomes. She added the community feedback was overwhelmingly in favor of mid -size housing as well as architectural style to blend in with the rest of the mid-century style in the Texa Tonka area. She said of those that opposed the development shown, half of those wanted to see less density and shorter buildings and half indicated they would support higher density and taller buildings. Chair Kraft opened the public hearing. Scott Breyfogle, 2904 Sumter Ave., stated that he has concerns about increased traffic on Sumter Avenue and parking in front of homes. He is concerned about property taxes and how this proposal will affect property taxes for homes on Sumter, and that he has concerns about construction noise. There are several people that work from home on Sumter and that construction will cause noise pollution. John Honsa, 2931 S umter, stated that he is a 20-year resident and that many people who responded to the city’s survey did not live in the neighborhood. He had concerns about a 5-story building and the view and privacy from Sumter Avenue toward the east sid e of the building since there are no trees in Rainbow Park between Sumter and the property. He also voiced concerns about north bound traffic on Texas/Virginia/Cedar Lake Road, stating that turning onto Cedar Lake Road is already difficult. G eena Brown stated that she lives immediately south of the dentist at 3011 Texas and is supportive of the project and more residential in the area in general, but wanted to echo voices that were coming out of the neighborhood that she would prefer a three story building rather than a 4-5 story building. She also stated that she would prefer to see more affordable units, and that what is provided is not enough for an affordable family area. One caller could not be heard at all and was asked to call back. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 33 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Commissioner Weber asked if there is enough parking at the development for all residents, given the underground parking. He asked if this would be a concern to residents in the nearby area. Ms. Monson stated the development has four more parking spaces than is required by code. She stated staff does not anticipate any overflow parking and there is no parking on Texas Avenue due to the bike lane. She stated the developer is providing 134 parking spaces on site and no overflow parking is anticipated onto area side streets. Darla Hoff er, 3024 Sumter Ave., stated she lives two blocks from the development. She has concerns about inappropriate height and a 5-story building, and is concerned about people being to see into backyards. The audio for Ms. Hoffer’s call was poor. Ms. Monson stated that Ms. Hoffer submitted a comment letter prior to the commission’s meeting, which had five points of concern including height, privacy, and taxes. She stated the letter was shared with the commission prior to the meeting. Mr. Walther stated because of technical difficulties on the calls this evening, the public will be allowed to comment at the city council meeting and are also invited to contact staff with their comments, which will then be passed on to the commission and the council as well. The Chair closed the public hearing. Chair Kraft directed any additional callers to call during the city council meeting to voice any concerns they have. Commissioner Weber added public comments could possibly be made on a city hall voice mail and recorde d, and then passed on to the commission and council as well. Commissioner Eckholm agreed with both Mr. Walther and Commissioner Weber. Chair Kraft directed staff to have the public reach out to Ms. Monson at city hall or on the city website. Commissioner Eckholm stated he likes this development, adding he also lives in the area. He stated this is a great use of the site and he enjoys how the area is coming back to life. He stated he is impressed with the commitment to electric vehicle chargers and lik es the design features that Paster has included to fit the vision of the small area plan. Commissioner Weber agreed adding putting this next to a park is wonderful. He again noted the intersection and asked staff to be thoughtful of turn lanes and mid-block crossing lights in the area. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Page 34 Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Commissioner Beneke also supported the plan stating all the details were well thought out. He stated it is a well-thought-out plan and it is exciting to see the area being built out. Chair Kraft agreed, and stated she supports the project which will reactivate the intersection, and the townhomes, businesses and the architecture responds well to the neighborhood, while the character fits in well with the mall across the street. Commissioner Dagane added he is excited also about the project stating it adds value to the area and helps lower-income families and he will support this project. Commissioner Weber made a motion, Commissioner Eckholm seconded, recommending approval of the changes as proposed by staff. The motion passed on a vote of 6-0. From:Adrea Jeske Mauseth To:Jennifer Monson Subject:Texa-Tonka Apts Date:Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:52:48 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Jennifer- I am writing to express our support for the Texa-Tonka developments. We are excited about the changes made to the shopping center and expect additional good things to come from the housing complex. The open parking lot currently situated on the parcel will be better suited for housing. In addition, it offers affordable units. Paster Properties has been great to work with from a community standpoint. Hope all is going well with the project. Happy 2021. Adrea Mauseth City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 35 1 Jennifer Monson From:Chris Irving <C.Irv@LIVE.COM> Sent:Monday, January 4, 2021 10:59 PM To:Jennifer Monson Cc:Timnah Sela Subject:Expressing support for Texa-Tonka Apartments project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello— My wife (Timnah Sela; CCd) and I are writing to express our support for the proposed Texa‐Tonka Apartments development at the corner of Texas Ave South and Minnetonka Boulevard (on the agenda for the January 6 Board of Zoning Appeals and Planning Commission meeting). We just moved to the Cobblecrest neighborhood in Saint Louis Park (just west of this proposed development) this past November and are little by little getting settled in. We are longtime Minnesota residents, having just moved from Minneapolis. We love our new city and new neighborhood and are thrilled to see the possibility of a development like this coming just down the street from us. It is fantastic to see interest in investment and growth in the area. We love the idea of creating some additional density in the area, providing more housing options for people who want to move to this part of town, and having some affordable additional housing become available. Additional residential density could also attract more interest from businesses looking to set up shop nearby, which would be fantastic. We would very much like to see this project move forward! Please consider approving it. Thank you for your time. Chris Irving Timnah Sela 3011 Decatur Ave S St Louis Park City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 36 1 Jennifer Monson From:Danya Kornblum <dkornblum@sabesjcc.org> Sent:Monday, January 4, 2021 6:21 PM To:Jennifer Monson Subject:Letter of Support – Texa Tonka Apt Project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Jennifer, My name is Danya Kornblum and I live at 3020 Cavell. I am excited about the recent re‐investment in our part of St. Louis Park and the new restaurants and shops that will be opening soon. Investment in the Texa Tonka neighborhood is welcome and long overdue. I am supportive of additional density which promotes the urban vibe, and is one of the many reasons why I choose to raise my family in St. Louis Park. I am in favor of the proposed new apartment project across from Texa Texa shopping center and believe the neighborhood will benefit from giving others who want to live in the Texa Tonka neighborhood choices in the types of available housing. Sincerely, Danya Kornblum Chief Operatiing Officer Minnesota JCC I 952.381.3344 I minnesotajcc.org City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 37 January 4, 2021 Planning Commission of St. Louis Park, MN Comments on the final planned unit development on Texas and Minnetonka Blvd. I have objections to this project for the following reasons: 1.Building a 4 or 5 unit (which is it by the way?) in a mainly residential neighborhood is an issue that has been combined with improvements to Texa-Tonka shopping center. There is no doubt we all applauded and did not object to the badly needed update of the strip mall, but why does the apartment building appear to have been ‘slipped’ into that update and connected to that proposal as if it’s all one project? I don’t remember voting for this huge structure in the planning sessions and the lack of transparency to the residents is disturbing. 2.Traffic in the location is one of the biggest issues for the neighborhood, the study we saw at the last Zoom meeting was so ridiculous…. the reality of projections in traffic increase in undeniable to anyone with any common sense. 3.The privacy of yards and windows along Sumter and Texas Avenue. Not only is the skyline and shadowing a concern, but residents of the apartment building will be looking down into our yards. We can wave at each other. 4.Property taxes is a concern. If the structure adds to our property value, that is a good thing for the younger residents unless you are an older resident in this neighborhood. If we plan to sell our property, all is well. If we want to stay in our homes for years to come, the increase in property taxes every year could very well tax us right out of our homes. Without consistent maintenance by the developer as these buildings get sold and they do get sold, it’s how this company makes a living, the property values could also go down. The lack of concern for the older resident in a first-tier suburb has also become a conversation many of us have. Perhaps an assistant living building would be viewed differently. 5.How many apartment buildings there are being built in SLP is an issue with every resident I talk to, their faith in the city and the City Council is almost destroyed. My daughter and her family, the Sackrisons, in the Elmwood neighborhood went through a similar concern to the traffic in their historic neighborhood a few months ago. Those asking questions were called ‘troublemakers’ for daring to ask those probing questions. Very few residents want to see these massive structures standing alone on every available lot for simply income and tax base to the city without regard for residents. 6.What are the occupancy rates of the average new building? How many of these apartment builders are built by the same development company and have a close relationship with the city or council? We all want progress, but I don’t see anything good that can come out of this particular project. Thank you! City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 38 Darla Hoffer 3024 Sumter Avenue South City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 39 From: John J <johninslp@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 12, 2021 11:06 AM To: Jennifer Monson <jmonson@stlouispark.org> Subject: Re: Texa-Tonka Apartments questions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Jennifer, How are you? With the Planning Commission approving the proposal, I spoke with several neighbors who are unfortunately disappointed that the 5 story building will continue to be moved forward. We propose that additional trees be added either on the proposed property or in the park along the East property line. Attached is a document with some sightline views from Sumter Ave S and a proposal to include trees on the property or in the park to provide a break between the view and the building. As the proposal does not have the required number of trees, we believe this is an acceptable proposal. There is also a lot of concern with the lack of transparency of the contamination which was found in the Environmental Assessment report that you sent. We noticed it was a draft and was not a complete report. Parents in the neighborhood are very concerned, especially with Rainbow Park right next to this property. Please let me know if you have any questions. I will be sending an email to the Mayor and the City Council with the concerns from the neighborhood. Thanks, John City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 40 From: John J <johninslp@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:46 PM To: Jennifer Monson <jmonson@stlouispark.org> Subject: Re: Texa-Tonka Apartments questions CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Jennifer, How are you? I did not see an attachment on the contamination report referenced on your last email. Can you resend it? It was unfortunate that there were audio issues during today's Planning Commission meeting, I believe Sean Walther captured my comments pretty well, but I wanted to send you them for the record and included them in the packet sent to the City Council based on my own concerns and conversations I have had with neighbors: I am a 20-year resident of St Louis Park. The majority of the respondents to the Small Area Survey were not within 1 mile of the proposed area. Therefore much of the feedback did not come from the neighborhood. My front window faces west directly at the east elevation with no trees blocking the view of a 5-story building. Residents on the west side of Rhode Island would also be able to see a 5-story building from their backyard. Northbound traffic from location from Texas avenue to Virginia would cause additional traffic issues on Cedar Lake Road and Virginia, which is already an issue today during peak traffic. I want to thank the Commissioners for their concern with not being able to hear the call-in participants due to the audio issues and providing alternatives for providing City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 41 comments to the City Council. Will this be brought up at the next City Council Meeting? Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Thanks, John Honsa 2931 Sumter Ave South City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 42 1 Jennifer Monson From:Michelle Becker <shellydbecker@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 9:26 AM To:Jennifer Monson Subject:Texa Tonka project Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Jennifer, I live next door to the upcoming Texa Tonka apartment/condo building site. I think overall this should be an improvement for the corner of Texas and Minnetonka Blvd. That corner has sat vacant for too long. I know there will be disruption caused by the construction, but ultimately I believe it will be for the greater good of this community. I have been in contact with Mike Sturdivant of Pastor properties and trust that he is someone I can continue to communicate any issues with along the way. Sincerely, Michele Becker Sent from my iPhone City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 43 From:Casey Kreie To:Jennifer Monson Subject:NE Corner of Texa Tonka Apartment Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 10:04:54 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I understand that there is a public hearing tomorrow regarding the apartment at Texa Tonka and so I wanted to let my opinion be known. I would love for an apartment to be at that corner. That corner currently contributes nothing to the neighborhood as a parking lot. In order for the Texa Tonka economic area to thrive there needs to be a higher population in the area, so this building will be great for that. My only question regarding the building is why commercial space wasn't considered for the first floor. Thanks so much. Casey City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 44 From:Nicole LaPoint To:Jennifer Monson Subject:Texatonka redevelopment Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 4:48:22 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr Monson, I do have a concern regarding the proposed redevelopment project, Texa-Tonka Apartments, on the NE corner of Texas Ave and Minnetonka Blvd. I want to make sure there is plenty of parking on site for ALL RESIDENTS. I do not want my quiet non thru street to become a parking lot for the future residents of this property. Although I appreciate the proposal to keep access from the park thru to Texas Ave, I am concerned residents will use that access to leave vehicles on the street by the park where many kids play. Thank you for taking this into consideration for the current residents of this area. We want to keep this a safe quiet neighborhood. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 45 From:Scott Kosloski To:Jennifer Monson Subject:Texa-tonka project support Date:Wednesday, January 6, 2021 8:24:51 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. HI Jennifer - happy New Year! I just wanted to drop a quick line regarding the Texa Tonka project. I know there is a planning meeting tonight regarding the process. I'll be unable to attend due to two rambunctious children and bed times. To this point, outside the meeting we held virtually a couple months back, nobody has brought any concerns to me regarding the project. I know in terms of larger projects like this that is a good thing! Generally people will make themselves known and clearly known if there is strong opposition. Mike is keeping the Texa-Tonka neighborhood committee updated on any concerns that he has come across along the way as well and it seems pretty minimal. From what I understand any concerns have been met with a slight alteration of plans or a point of clarification and things seem fine. From a personal view, living only a block from the site, I'm in full support of the project. I think it will bring nothing but positive revitalization to the neighborhood and will only compliment the work Paster has done on the Texa- Tonka mall. Feel free to share my comments or voice my support with any interested parties as you see fit and I hope the meeting goes well tonight. As always, if you need anything from me please let me know. Thanks! Scott Kosloski 763.360.9354 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 46 From:Steve LaPoint To:Jennifer Monson Subject:Texa Tonka Apartment Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 7:38:47 PM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. In the current plan the complex must be able to support parking for all residents. In a previous plan that was presented for the apartment the number of parking spots allocated did not meet the needs of the build. If there won’t be enough parking spot then Texas ave should be reconfigured to allow parking on both sides and Sumter Ave south of 29th should be permit parking only since all overflow parking will end up in front of my house. Steve LaPoint City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 47 From:scott breyfogle To:Jennifer Monson Subject:Formal register for my opposition to purposed Texa Tonka and Minnetonka Development Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 7:58:26 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Jennifer: As per the letter date January 6, 2021, the intent of this email is to formally register my opposition to the purposed 3-5 story, 101 multifamily building and 2-story 11-unit townhouse at the property located on the northeast corner of Texas Avenue and Minnetonka Boulevard. I have owned my home at 2904 Sumter Ave, S for over 18 years. If you look on a map, you will see I have one of the homes whose property butts up to this proposed development. The reasons for my opposition include: <!--[if !supportLists]-->· <!--[endif]-->The city in their research of this development have yet to provide a cost benefit analysis on the impact of property values on Sumter Ave and other surrounding streets. Even with the current housing market, I along with so many neighbors, fear our homes will greatly be devalued. <!--[if !supportLists]-->· <!--[endif]-->Increased traffic to Sumter Ave during construction. As witnesses by other construction projects that have occurred, our street has become the de facto detour for cars, buses and trucks. Often these vehicles ignore the speed limit and endanger the children of the neighborhood. <!--[if !supportLists]-->· <!--[endif]-->I understand Sumter Ave is a public street, however, like many of my neighbors, we feel our street will be used to house over-flow parking from this development. <!--[if !supportLists]-->· <!--[endif]-->Even before Covid, many residents of Sumter Ave, maintained jobs that were remote. I have worked from home for the past four years. I should not have to tolerate noise pollution in order to do my job. And I should not just tolerate as Rachel Harris implied. <!--[if !supportLists]-->· <!--[endif]-->While the developer in charge of this project has overhauled the Texa Tonka mall the cosmetically improved a building remains largely vacant. I doubt their intentions with this project can be accurately full filled. I do not believe the city has examined more viable locations for this development. The site at that currently houses Texa Tonka Liquor and hair salon would be a far more viable location since those sites are closer to the type of housing that is being proposed. If you are looking for recommendations what should go on the of Texas Avenue and City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 48 Minnetonka Boulevard site, I believe this space could be best utilized for: <!--[if !supportLists]-->· <!--[endif]-->Single family homes that complement the existing homes in the surrounding neighborhoods. Perhaps a few these homes could benefit the Habitat for Humanity. <!--[if !supportLists]-->· <!--[endif]-->An expansion of Rainbow Park and additional green space for things like public art or community gardens. I do not think the residents of Sumter Ave have been included on enough discussions in regard to this project. I urge further study of this project including water and ground contamination and the impact on surrounding property values. If this project moves forward, I expect you will see an increase number of homes being put on the market in the surrounding area. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Scott Breyfogle 952-926-0151 readermn@yahoo.com City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 49 January 18, 2021 City Council of St. Louis Park, MN Comments on the final planned unit development on Texas and Minnetonka Blvd. 1.We do not remember voting for a 5-story structure in the planning sessions and that the lack of transparency to the residents is disturbing. 2.Building a 5-story building in a mainly residential neighborhood is an issue that has been combined with improvements to Texa-Tonka shopping center. There is no doubt we all applauded to the desperately needed update of the strip mall, not a 5-story building. 3.We are proposing a compromise for a 3-story apartment building for the effect it will have on the skyline of a mainly residential neighborhood. This size structure would fit much better with other existing buildings in the general area. 4.Traffic in the location is one of the biggest issues for the neighborhood, the study we saw at the last Zoom meeting was so ridiculous…. the reality of projections in traffic increase in undeniable. Studies are generally only as good as those who paid for. A 3-story building would help eliminate some of the traffic concerns for Texas, Minnetonka, and Louisiana Avenue. As proposed, there will be up to 150 new vehicles entering Texas Avenue every day. As one older woman said at one of the meetings, “How will I ever back out of my driveway?” 5.Not only is the skyline and shadowing a concern, but residents of the apartment building will be looking down into our residential yards. Perhaps we can wave at each other. 6.How many apartment buildings there are being built in SLP is an issue with every resident, their faith in the city and the City Council is fragile My daughter, the Sackrison, in the Elmwood neighborhood, went through a similar concern in their historic neighborhood a few months ago. Those asking questions were called ‘troublemakers’ for daring to ask those probing questions. Few residents want to see these massive structures on every available lot for developer income and tax base to the city without regard for residents. Especially the elderly who have would be better served with assistant living. We all want progress, but we do not see anything good that can come out of this project in a residential neighborhood at 5-stories. Thank you! Darla Hoffer 3024 Sumter Avenue South SLP, MN 55426 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 50 From:Geena Brown To:Jennifer Monson; Rachel Harris Subject:Texa-Tonka Development Comments and Concerns Date:Tuesday, January 19, 2021 8:57:20 AM CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Jennifer and Councilmember Harris, We are the residents at 3011 Texas Ave S, the first house south of the proposed apartments at Texa- Tonka. We’re writing to express both our support and concerns with the development proposed. We tried to call in at the planning commission meeting, but we’re not sure we were actually heard with the technical difficulties. We are very excited to see more housing in our neighborhood, especially on a currently vacant site. It’s our hope that this development will attract businesses to both the large shopping center and the buildings on the SW corner of Texas and Minnetonka. The townhomes especially are needed in our community. When we were renters, we had a really hard time finding anything other than traditional apartments. Our first concern is the makeup of the proposed development. Laid out in the proposal is the city’s “Housing Goal 4”, where point B is “promote the inclusion of family-sized units…”. The proposal for the apartment complex portion includes only 13 two-bedroom and no three-bedroom units. Even including the townhomes, multi-bedroom is only 20% of total units. I am asking that the city push for more multi-bedroom units. This would instantly improve the affordability (potential for roommates) and accessibility to couples and families. Second, many of our neighbors have already spoken out about their concerns with the building’s height. Their concerns have all been dismissed without discussion, saying that the small area plan presented didn’t explicitly limit height. The community feels misled – shown a reasonably sized building in the plan then a developer comes in proposing something twice as big. The plan heavily implied a 2-3 apartment complex with the possibility of ground-floor commercial. There have been many comments in meetings and on Nextdoor pleading for this to be shorter. We understand there are cleanup costs at the site, would they be open to a 3-story complex as shown in the plan? Or do they absolutely need 5 stories to be financially viable? Is there a way to provide tax incentives to bring this project closer in line with what was presented in the small area plan? Thank you, Geena and Marcus 3011 Texas Ave S City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 51 MINNETONKA BOULEVARD(COUNTY ROAD NO. 5)TEXAS AVENUE SOUTHWEST 29TH STREETAAB999a9a99992901 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301652907 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301662913 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301672917 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301682921 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301692927 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301712929 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301702939 TEXAS AVE SOUTHPID: 08117213301727916 MINNETONKA BLVDPID: 0811721330173SUMTER AVENUE SOUTH15.54S52°15'07"E33.18S87°48'31"E38.775.04124.98 562.50 Δ=2°22'29"R=929.67L=38.53PRELIMINARY PLAT PID# SHOWN ON SURVEY 2901-2939 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH A 9 UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE FOUND MONUMENT SET MONUMENT CABLE TV PEDESTAL AIR CONDITIONER ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LIGHT POLE GUY WIRE POWER POLE GAS MANHOLE GAS METER TELEPHONE MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SANITARY CLEANOUT SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION HYDRANT CURB STOP WATER WELL WATER MANHOLE WATER METER POST INDICATOR VALVE WATER VALVE BOLLARD FLAG POLE MAIL BOX TRAFFIC SIGN UNKNOWN MANHOLE SOIL BORING PLAT DISTANCE MEASURED DISTANCE TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE LEGEND: B 9a PID#0811721330173 CONTACT: PASTER PROPERTIES Mike Sturdivant Director of Real Estate Developement 5320 West 23rd Street Suite 205 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 651-265-7871 VICINITY MAP PAS19013 SURVPAS13 PRELIMINARY PLAT COUNTY/CITY: REVISIONS: PROJECT LOCATION: LAND SURVEYING, INC. CORNERSTONE Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 dan@ cssurvey .net DATE REVISION PROJECT NO. FILE NAME 7916 MINNETONKA BLVD. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK HENNEPIN COUNTY NORTH(NOT TO SCALE) 04-17-19 INITIAL ISSUE 10-13-20 ADDITIONAL INFO 10-21-20 PRELIMINARY PLAT 12-15-20 BUILDING, R/W 12-29-20 EASEMENTS SEC. 08, TWP. 117, RNG. 21,CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, HENNEPIN COUNTY,MINNESOTA EDITH ADDITION UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THE SURVEYOR HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) 190981618. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. OTHER UTILITIES MAY EXIST ON THIS SITE THAT WERE NOT MARKED UP. CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! TWIN CITY AREA:TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call THIS PROPERTY LIES WITHIN THE UNSHADED ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN, AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 27053C0334F HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF NOVEMBER 4, 2016. FLOOD INFORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION:EASEMENT NOTES: 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE HENNEPIN COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE. 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATES AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY BE SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES; GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. SURVEY NOTES: PROPOSED AREAS: TOTAL EXISTING AREA = 80,213 SQ.FT., BEING 1.84 ACRES, MORE OR LESS PROPOSED LOT 1, BLOCK 1 = 79,061 SQ.FT. / 1.81 ACRES PROPOSED DEDICATED RIGHT OF WAY = 1,152 SQ. FT. / 0.03 ACRES The following Legal Description is as shown on the Commercial Partners Title, LLC as agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company Title Commitment No. 55396 First Supplemental, dated April 11, 2019: PARCEL 1: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota. AND Lot 6, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, except that part included within the North 120 feet of the South 283 feet of that part of the South one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 8, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the West line of East Texa-Tonka Addition. AND That part of Lot 6, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition included within the North 120 feet of the South 283 feet of that part of the South one-half of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 8, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the West line of East Texa-Tonka Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property PARCEL 2: Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 7 then East to the Southeast corner thereof, then North 89.5 feet, then West 47 feet, then North 26.5 feet, then West 20.5 feet, then South 13 feet, then West 16.5 feet, then South 30 feet, then West 46 feet, then South 73.5 feet to beginning, Lot 7, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, excepting therefrom: All that part of Lot 7, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition, lying Southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line of said lot distant 15 feet East of the Southwest corner of said lot, to a point on the West line of said lot distant 15 feet North of said Southwest corner. AND Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 7, then South 56.5 feet, then East 46 feet, then North 30 feet, then East 16.5 feet, then North 13 feet, then East 20.5 feet, then South 26.5 feet, then East 47 feet, then North 40.5 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 7, then West to beginning, Lot 7, Block 1, Texa-Tonka 5th Addition. Hennepin County, Minnesota Abstract Property The following survey related exceptions appear on the Commercial Partners Title, LLC as agent for Stewart Title Guaranty Company Title Commitment No. 55396 First Supplemental, dated April 11, 2019: 9. Utility easement dedicated on the plat of Texa-Tonka 5th Addition filed November 14, 1960, as Document No. 3261960. (SHOWN ON SURVEY) The sewer easement dedicated on the plat was vacated by Ordinance No. 930 of the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park filed on May 12, 1965, as Document No. 3540548. (SHOWN ON SURVEY) 10. Conditions contained in Resolution No. 84-15 by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park filed February 15, 1984, as Document No. 4867901. (AFFECTS A PORTION OF PARCEL 2. NOT ABLE TO BE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY.) 11. Resolution No. 3-99, by the Board of Zoning Appeals of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, filed July 23, 1999, as Document No. 7151194. (AFFECTS ALL OF PARCEL 2 AND A PORTION OF PARCEL 1. NOT ABLE TO BE SHOWN GRAPHICALLY.) 12. Terms and conditions of Right of First Offer Agreement dated January 23, 2019, filed January 30, 2019, as Document No. A10631690. (NOT SURVEY RELATED) CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Daniel L. Thurmes Registration Number: 25718 Date:__________________4-17-19 0 NORTH 30 60 LOT 1 BLOCK 1 PROPOSED 10' D+U EASEMENT PROPOSED 10' D+U EASEMENT PROPOSED 10' D+U EASEMENTPROPOSED 10' D+U EASEMENTPROPOSED R/WPROPOSED 10' TRAIL AND SIDEWALK EASEMENT BY SEPARATE DOCUMENT City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 52 1 5 . 5 4 S 5 2 ° 1 5 ' 0 7 " E 3 3 . 1 8 S87°48'31"E 38.77 5.04124.98562.50Δ=2°22'29" R=929.67 L=38.53 Being 10.00 feet in width and adjoiningpublic ways and 6.00 feet in width andadjoining plat lines, unless otherwise shownon this plat.For the purposes of this survey the westline of Block 1, TEXA-TONKA 5THADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesotais assumed to bear N01°37'26"W.EDITH ADDITIONSHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETSLEGENDDenotes monument found (as noted)Denotes 12 inch x 14 inch iron pipe set and marked withMinnesota License No. 25718 (monuments to be setwithin one year after recording of the plat)DRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS:C.R. DOC. NO.LAND SURVEYING, INC.CORNERSTONE0NORTH30 60KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Texa Tonka Apartments, LLC, aMinnesota limited liability company, owner of the following described propertysituated in County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota to wit:Lots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, Block 1, TEXA-TONKA 5TH ADDITION;Lot 6, Block 1, TEXA-TONKA 5TH ADDITION, except that part includedwithin the North 120 feet of the South 283 feet of that part of the Southone-half of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter ofSection 8, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the West line of EASTTEXA-TONKA ADDITION;That part of Lot 6, Block 1, TEXA-TONKA 5TH ADDITION includedwithin the North 120 feet of the South 283 feet of that part of the Southone-half of the Southwest one-quarter of the Southwest one-quarter ofSection 8, Township 117, Range 21, lying West of the West line of EASTTEXA-TONKA ADDITION;Commencing at the Southwest corner of Lot 7 then East to theSoutheast corner thereof, then North 89.5 feet, then West 47 feet, thenNorth 26.5 feet, then West 20.5 feet, then South 13 feet, then West 16.5feet, then South 30 feet, then West 46 feet, then South 73.5 feet tobeginning, Lot 7, Block 1, TEXA-TONKA 5TH ADDITION, exceptingtherefrom: All that part of Lot 7, Block 1, TEXA-TONKA 5TH ADDITION,lying Southwesterly of a line drawn from a point on the South line ofsaid lot distant 15 feet East of the Southwest corner of said lot, to apoint on the West line of said lot distant 15 feet North of saidSouthwest corner;Commencing at the Northwest corner of Lot 7, then South 56.5 feet,then East 46 feet, then North 30 feet, then East 16.5 feet, then North 13feet, then East 20.5 feet, then South 26.5 feet, then East 47 feet, thenNorth 40.5 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 7, then West tobeginning, Lot 7, Block 1, TEXA-TONKA 5TH ADDITION.Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as EDITH ADDITION anddoes hereby dedicate to the public for public use forever the public waysand the drainage and utility easements as created by this plat.I, Daniel L. Thurmes, do hereby certify that I have surveyed andplatted or directly supervised the surveying and platting of theproperty described on this plat as EDITH ADDITION; that I am aduly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that thisplat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that allmathematical data and labels are correctly designated on thisplat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have beencorrectly set; that all water boundaries and wet lands as of thisdate, as defined in Minnesota Statutes Section 505.01, Subd. 3,are shown and labeled; and all public ways are shown andlabeled on this plat.Dated this _________ day of ___________________, 202___.____________________________________________Daniel L. Thurmes, Licensed Land Surveyor,Minnesota License No. 25718STATE OF MINNESOTACOUNTY OF WASHINGTONThe foregoing Surveyor's Certificate was acknowledged beforeme on this _________ day of ___________________, 202___, byDaniel L. Thurmes, Licensed Land Surveyor._________________________________ (SIGNATURE)__________________________________ (PRINT)Notary Public,Dakota County, MinnesotaMy Commission Expires January 31, 2025CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTAThis plat of EDITH ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park,Minnesota, at a regular meeting thereof held this _______ day of ___________________ , 20_____, and is incompliance with the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2.CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTABy: _____________________________________, MayorBy:___________________________________ , ClerkRESIDENTIAL AND REAL ESTATE SERVICESI hereby certify that taxes payable in 20___ and prior years have been paid for land described on this Plat, datedthis _______ day of _______________________, 20___.Mark V. Chapin, County Auditorby____________________________________ DeputySURVEY DIVISION, Hennepin County, MinnesotaPursuant to MN. STAT. Sec. 383B.565 (1969), this plat has been approved this _________ day of ______________,20___.Chris F. Mavis, County Surveyorby____________________________________COUNTY RECORDER, Hennepin County, MinnesotaI hereby certify that the within plat of EDITH ADDITION was recorded in this office this ______ day of______________, 20___, at _____ o'clock _____.m.Martin McCormick, County Recorderby___________________________________ DeputyIn witness whereof said Texa Tonka Apartments, LLC,a Minnesota limited liability company, has causedthese presents to be signed this ________day of___________________, 20___.SIGNED: Howard Paster, PresidentBy ____________________________________________,its PresidentSTATE OF _________________________COUNTY OF _______________________The foregoing instrument was acknowledged beforeme this _______day of __________________________,20____, by Howard Paster, President of Texa TonkaApartments, LLC, a Minnesota limited liabilitycompany, on behalf of said company.______________________________________(SIGNATURE)_____________________________________ (PRINT)Notary Public____________________________My CommissionExpires____________________1 INCH = 30 FEETLOT 1BLOCK 1MINNETONKA BOULEVARD City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka ApartmentsPage 53 1514 13 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH MINNETONKA BOULEVARD(COUNTY ROAD NO. 5)WEST 29TH STREETNO PARKING NO PARKING G G PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 5-STORY BUILDING AREA 99,606± S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 21,087± S.F GARAGE FFE: 917.66 MAIN FLOOR FFE: 929.00 WALK OUTS FFE: 929.50 WALK OUTS FFE: 917.66 PR. TOWNHOMES BLDG FOOTPRINT AREA 2,923± S.F GARAGE FFE:917.80 FIRST FLOOR FFE:918.30 PROPOSED TOWNHOMES BLDG FOOTPRINT AREA 6,161± S.F GARAGE FFE:917.80 FIRST FLOOR FFE: 918.30 61.8'9.5'24.0'TYP.9.7'23.0'R5.0' R 5 . 0 'R8.0 '5.0'6.5'TYP.6.0'TYP.8.5' 2.0' 6.0' TYP. R50.0'R56.0' R44.0' R50.0' "BIKE LANE/NO PARKING" SIGN R5.0'24.0'TYP.29.0'TYP.28.0' TYP. 8.5'18.0'TYP.9.5'18.0'TYP.10.4'18.0'TYP.8.5'18.0'TYP.4.0' TYP.5.0'14.0'18.0'TYP.26.9'40.0'6.0' 12.8'10.0'6.0' TYP.16.0'8.0' 8.0'6.0'TYP.6.0' TYP.6.5'TYP.7.4'14.0'8.7'10.0'48.0' 60.0'18.5'9.5' 4.0' TYP.14.0'10.0'4.0'18.0'10.0'6.0' TYP. 12.6' 6.0' TYP. 0.5 6.0' 6.0'15.0'10.0' 1.5'15.9'31.9'6.4'8.4' 36.8' 1 0 . 3 '7.9'10.0'6.0'8.0'15.0'17.0' 6.0'10.0'10.0'22.8'PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE PROPERTY LINE A A A A A R A A A B B B B BC C EE E E E EE G HH H H H I I K K K K K KKKKKKKK K K K K K LL M A B B B B B K A S T T U V W AX YY Z DEDICATED ROW K DOG RUN C EX. TRAFFIC SIGNAL AA C C EX. ELECTRIC POLE TO REMAIN 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT BUS STOP WAITING AREA K DRAINAGE SWALE CENTERLINE SIGHT TRIANGLE 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 10' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT BB BB BB BBBB BB BBBBBBBBBBBBBB BB BB BB SS CC CC EXPOSED FOUNDATION WITH FUTURE ADDITIONAL EXPOSURE EXPOSED FOUNDATION WITH FUTURE ADDITIONAL EXPOSURE BB O FF O DD DD DD EE EE EE EE C EE EE AA J PRIVATELY OWNED, BUT PUBLIC ACCESSED TRAIL EE DD GG GG DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.ALAN L. CATCHPOOL12/29/202047969This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\Texas-Tonka Ave, St Louis Park, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg December 29, 2020 - 10:21pm©SHEET NUMBER PRELIMINARY-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYBYREVISIONSNo.DATE1CITY COMMENTS11/23/2020 EIS2CITY COMMENTS12/18/2020 EIS3CITY COMMENTS12/29/2020 EIS BUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 1.81 AC PR. IMPERVIOUS AREA 1.39 AC PR. PERVIOUS AREA 0.42 AC BUILDING AREA 118,444 GFA PARKING REQUIRED PARKING 134 SPACES PROPOSED PARKING 138 SPACES, 42 EXTERIOR SPACES/ 91 INTERIOR SPACES, 5 STREET(29TH ST) SPACES ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 5 STALLS / 5 STALLS BICYCLE SPACES 126 SPACES (112 INTERIOR & 14 EXTERIOR) PROPERTY SUMMARY TEXAS & MINNETONKA RESIDENTIAL TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1.81 AC ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING R-3 (RESIDENTIAL 3) & C-1 (GENERAL COMMERCIAL) PROPOSED ZONING PUD BUILDING SETBACKS FRONT = 0' SIDE = 0' REAR = 0' PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE RETAINING WALL PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND SITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 3' AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC., DATED 04/17/2019. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 1.84 ACRES. 9. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 10. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 11. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 12. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 13. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 14. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. 15. ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE 8.5' IN WIDTH AND 18' IN LENGTH UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED.NORTHKEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) TRANSITION CURB AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. ASPHALT PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY APRON - PER CITY OF ST. PAUL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY #4 STANDARD DETAIL PAVEMENT STRIPING PROPOSED SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALL (DESIGN BY OTHERS) STOP SIGN - MUTCD R1-1 LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS 4' DECORATIVE FENCE - SEE CIVIL DETAILS MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT SECTION IN TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH. CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD BIKE RACK: (2) RACKS/(4) STALLS - SEE CIVIL DETAILS "NO PARKING" SIGN - MUTCD R7-1 HANDICAP PARKING SIGN AND ACCESSIBLE PARKING SYMBOL LIGHT BOLLARD 6 FT CEDAR FENCE TRANSFORMER PAD DECORATIVE COLORED CONCRETE AMENITY AREA (SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS) 4' BLACK VINYL CHAIN LINK FENCE TRASH ENCLOSURE REINSTALL SALVAGED LIGHT POLE ON NEW BASE REINSTALL SALVAGE STREET SIGN DETECTABLE WARNING STAIRS/RISERS/PATIO/RAILING, SEE ARCH PLANS "NO PARKING IN FIRE LANE" SIGN, MUTCD R8-31 HANDRAILS FOR STEPS FLAT CURB BIKE RACK: (3) RACKS/(6) STALLS - SEE CIVIL DETAILS APS PUSH BUTTONS, CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA BB CC DD EE FF GG PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVEMENT PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT PREPARED FORSITE PLANC400TEXAS-TONKAREDEVELOPMENTTEXA TONKAAPARTMENTS LLCST. LOUIS PARKMNDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16085200312/29/2020AS SHOWNEISEISALCPROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE INTEGRALLY COLORED CONCRETE PAVEMENT- CEMSTONE COLOR IRONWOOD - CPC106L LIGHT BOLLARD COLOR-BLACK SNOW REMOVAL SHALL BE TEMPORARILY STORED IN LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR REMOVAL OFF-SITE. 5 PARKING STALLS TO BE INCLUDED ALONG 29TH STREET (ACCOUNTED FOR IN OVERALL PARKING COUNT, THIS PAGE) 3 3 3 3 3 CROSSWALK REALIGNMENT, RESTRIPING AND NEW APS PUSH BUTTONS AT THE CORNER OF MINNETONKA BLVD AND TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH WILL BE INSTALLED AFTER THE STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT. 3 City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 54 LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) 6' HEIGHT WOOD FENCE (TYP.) ORNAMENTAL METAL FENCE (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) DECOMPOSED GRANITE (TYP.) GAS GRILL - INCLUDES SUPPLY LINE AND GAS TIMERS (TYP.) PICNIC TABLE (TYP.)MINNETONKA BOULEVARD(COUNTY ROAD NO. 5)TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH WEST29TH STREETNO PARKING NO PARKING G G PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 5-STORY BUILDING AREA 99,606± S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 21,087± S.F GARAGE FFE: 917.66 MAIN FLOOR FFE: 929.00 WALK OUTS FFE: 929.50 WALK OUTS FFE: 917.66 PR. TOWNHOMES BLDG FOOTPRINT AREA 2,923± S.F GARAGE FFE:917.80 FIRST FLOOR FFE:918.30 PROPOSED TOWNHOMES BLDG FOOTPRINT AREA 6,161± S.F GARAGE FFE:917.80 FIRST FLOOR FFE: 918.30 3 - GNK2 - QUR1 - QUR 3 - SKY 2 - QUR 4 - SWS 1 - QUC 2 - RDL 2 - ALS 7 - SGM B A B A B A B A B A B A B B B A B A B A B A B B A C C C CC C C C C C C C C 3 - HCK 5 - SWO 6 - BOL LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SOUTH1 L102 LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT NORTH1 L101 B C B C C CCCC B C B 4 - HCK 3 - TRI A LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) ANNUALS BY OWNER (TYP.) A B C D E OVERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE QUR 5 QUERCUS ROBUR X ALBA `JFS-KW2QX`SKINNY GENES OAK #10 CONT.2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE SWS 4 PINUS CEMBRA SWISS STONE PINE B & B 6` HT. ORNAMENTAL TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE ALS 2 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLANCE` AUTUMN BRILLANCE SERVICEBERRY CLUMP B & B 6` HT. QUC 1 POPULUS TREMULOIDES QUAKING ASPEN CLUMP B & B 6` HT. OVERSTORY TREE CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE BOL 6 TILIA AMERICANA `BOULEVARD`BOULEVARD LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. GNK 3 GINKGO BILOBA `THE PRESIDENT` TM PRESIDENTIAL GOLD MAIDENHAIR B & B 2.5" CAL. HCK 7 CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS COMMON HACKBERRY B & B 2.5" CAL. RDL 2 TILIA AMERICANA `REDMOND`REDMOND AMERICAN LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. SGM 7 ACER X FREEMANII `SIENNA`SIENNA GLEN MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. SKY 3 GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS INERMIS `SKYCOLE` TM SKYLINE THORNLESS HONEY LOCUST B & B 2.5" CAL. SWO 5 QUERCUS BICOLOR SWAMP WHITE OAK B & B 2.5" CAL. TRI 3 ULMUS `MORTON GLOSSY`TRIUMPH ELM B & B 2.5" CAL. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE KFG 32 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS #1 CONT 30" OC MSG 31 MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `SILBERFEDER`MISCANTHUS SILVER FEATHER GRASS #1 CONT 36" OC CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE GOJ 16 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. MDJ 8 JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM `MEDORA`MEDORA JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. NOV 12 TAXUS CUSPIDATA `NOVA`NOVA YEW #5 CONT.4` O.C. SGJ 41 JUNIPERUS CHINENSIS `SEA GREEN`SEA GREEN JUNIPER #5 CONT.5` O.C. TAU 11 TAXUS X MEDIA `TAUNTONII`TAUTON YEW #5 CONT.5` O.C. WBM 9 PINUS MUGO `WHITE BUD`MUGO WHITE BUD PINE #5 CONT.3` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE ANH 17 HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS `ANNABELLE`ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA #5 CONT.4` O.C. DOG 21 CORNUS SERICEA `CARDINAL`CARDINAL RED-TWIG DOGWOOD #5 CONT.5` O.C. GGD 9 CORNUS HESSEI `GARDEN GLOW`GARDEN GLOW DOGWOOD #5 CONT.5` O.C. JWS 6 SPIRAEA ALBIFLORA JAPANESE WHITE SPIREA #2 CONT.3` O.C. LDN 2 PHYSOCARPUS OPULIFOLIUS `DONNA MAY` TM LITTLE DEVIL NINEBARK #5 CONT.4` O.C. MOV 6 VIBURNUM LANTANA `MOHICAN`MOHICAN VIBURNUM #5 CONT.5` O.C. PJM 22 RHODODENDRON X `P.J.M. COMPACT`PJM COMPACT RHODODENDRON #5 CONT.4` O.C. RGD 9 CORNUS ALBA SIBIRICA `RED GNOME`RED GNOME DOGWOOD #5 CONT.4` O.C. PLANT SCHEDULE GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING SPACING ALM 37 ALLIUM `MILLENIUM`MILLENIUM ALLIUM #1 CONT.14" O.C. 14" o.c. MNS 14 COREOPSIS VERTICILLATA `MOONBEAM`MOONBEAM COREOPSIS #1 CONT.18" O.C. 18" o.c. SWG 150 PANICUM VIRGATUM `HEAVY METAL`HEAVY METAL SWITCH GRASS #1 CONT.24" O.C. 24" o.c. PERENNIALS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING SPACING BES 28 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c. DAY 162 HEMEROCALLIS X `APRICOT SPARKLES`APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILY #1 CONT.15" OC 15" o.c. FAS 40 ASTILBE X ARENDSII `FANAL`FANAL ASTILBE #1 CONT 15" OC 15" o.c. GVH 94 HAKONECHLOA MACRA `AUREOLA`GOLDEN VARIEGATED HAKONECHLOA #1 CONT 16" OC 16" o.c. MFG 12 MISCANTHUS SINENSIS `PURPURESCENS`MISCANTHUS FLAME GRASS #1 CONT 48" o.c. PDS 41 SPOROBOLUS HETEROLEPIS PRAIRIE DROPSEED #1 CONT 24" OC 24" o.c. PWW 47 ECHINACEA X `POW WOW WILDBERRY`POW WOW WILDBERRY CONEFLOWER #1 CONT 24" OC 24" o.c. RAS 46 ASTILBE JAPONICA `RHINELAND`RHINELAND ASTIBLE #1 CONT 15" OC 15" o.c. WBA 64 ASTER DUMOSUS `WOOD`S BLUE`WOOD`S BLUE ASTER #1 CONT 12" OC 12" o.c. WGB 42 BERGENIA CORDIFOLIA `WINTER GLOW`WINTER GLOW BERGENIA #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c. WLC 44 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" OC 30" o.c. ARTIFICAL TURF CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING SPACING K9 715 SF ARTIFICAL TURF .K9 GRASS SYSTEM- CLASSIC ARTIFICAL TURF This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\Texas-Tonka Ave, St Louis Park, MN\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg December 29, 2020 - 10:23pmSHEET NUMBER PRELIMINARY-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYBYREVISIONSNo.DATE1CITY COMMENTS11/23/2020 EIS2CITY COMMENTS12/18/2020 EIS3CITY COMMENTS12/29/2020 EISNORTHDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.RYAN A. HYLLESTED, PLA12/29/202053828PREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100TEXAS-TONKAREDEVELOPMENTTEXA TONKAAPARTMENTS LLCST. LOUIS PARKMNDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16085200312/29/2020AS SHOWNSJBSJBRAHNORTHLANDSCAPE SUMMARY REQUIRED TREES-MULTIFAMILY: 119 TREES* = (100,232 GROSS FLOOR AREA APARTMENTS + 18,212 GROSS FLOOR AREA TOWNHOMES) / 1000 OR (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 30 TREES*=1,451 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/50 PROVIDED TREES-MULTIFAMILY: 48 TREES *MINIMUM 25% DECIDUOUS & 25% CONIFEROUS, NO MORE THAN 30% ONE SPECIES. REQUIRED SHRUBS-MULTIFAMILY: 711 SHRUBS = ((100,232 GROSS FLOOR AREA APARTMENTS + 18,212 GROSS FLOOR AREA TOWNHOMES) / 1000) * 6 OR (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) 175 SHRUBS = (1451 L.F. SITE PERIMETER/50) *6 PROVIDED SHRUBS-MULTIFAMILY: 1,073 SHRUBS = 189 SHRUBS + 884 PERENNIALS REQUIRED SCREENING: BUILDINGS/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO RESIDENTIAL USES. OFF-STREET PARKING WITHIN 30' OF RESIDENTIAL & R.O.W. LOADING AND SERVICE AREA. OUTSIDE STORAGE & REFUSE HANDLING. MECHANICAL AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT. UTILITY SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES. SCREENING-VEGETATION, FENCES, WALLS, BERMS, HEDGES, LANDSCAPE MATERIAL, OR A COMBINATION. PROVIDED SCREENING: BUILDINGS/ACCESSORY STRUCTURES TO RESIDENTIAL USES OFF-STREET PARKING WITHIN 30' OF RESIDENTIAL & R.O.W. LOADING AND SERVICE AREAS. OUTSIDE STORAGE & REFUSE HANDLING. MECHANICAL AND ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT. UTILITY SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE STRUCTURES. SCREENING- VEGETATION, FENCES, WALLS, BERMS, HEDGES, LANDSCAPE MATERIAL, OR A COMBINATION OF. ((A/B)-0.20) x C x A = D ((283/283)-0.20) x 1.5 x 283= 339.6 DIAMETER INCHES A = TOTAL DIAMETER INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES LOST AS A RESULT OF LAND ALTERATION OR REMOVAL. (283 DIAMETER INCHES) B = TOTAL DIAMETER INCHES OF SIGNIFICANT TREES SITUATED ON THE LAND. (283 DIAMETER INCHES) C = TREE REPLACEMENT CONSTANT (1.5). D = REPLACEMENT TREES REQUIRED (NUMBER OF CALIPER INCHES). (339.6 DIAMETER INCHES) TREE REPLACEMENT PROVIDED: 85 DIAMETER INCHES= (4 CONIFEROUS TREES (6' HT.)* 2.5 CALIPER INCHES) + (3 ORNAMENTAL TREES (6' HT.)* 2.5 CALIPER INCHES ) + (27 OVERSTORY TREES * 2.5 CALIPER INCHES) (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) TREE MITIGATION DATA- PRIVATE TREE REMOVAL/ TREE REPLACEMENT REQUIRED: 109 DIAMETER INCHES TREE REPLACEMENT PROVIDED:35 DIAMETER INCHES= 14 PROPOSED STREET TRESS * 2.5 CALIPER INCHES (SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN) TREE MITIGATION DATA- PUBLIC City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 55 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH MINNETONKA BOULEVARD(COUNTY ROAD NO. 5)WEST 29TH STREETNO PARKING NO PARKING G G PROPOSED MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING 5-STORY BUILDING AREA 99,606± S.F. BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA 21,087± S.F GARAGE FFE: 917.66 MAIN FLOOR FFE: 929.00 WALK OUTS FFE: 929.50 WALK OUTS FFE: 917.66 PR. TOWNHOMES BLDG FOOTPRINT AREA 2,923± S.F GARAGE FFE:917.80 FIRST FLOOR FFE:918.30 PROPOSED TOWNHOMES BLDG FOOTPRINT AREA 6,161± S.F GARAGE FFE:917.80 FIRST FLOOR FFE: 918.30 DORA - ROOF DECK DATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.------------This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2020 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\Texas-Tonka Ave, St Louis Park, MN\3 Design\CAD\Exhibits\DORA Exhibit.dwg December 29, 2020 - 10:23pm©SHEET NUMBER PRELIMINARY-NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPRELIMINARYBYREVISIONSNo.DATE1CITY COMMENTS11/23/2020 EIS2CITY COMMENTS12/18/2020 EIS3CITY COMMENTS12/29/2020 EISNORTHPREPARED FORDORA PLANL105TEXAS-TONKAREDEVELOPMENTTEXA TONKAAPARTMENTS LLCST. LOUIS PARKMNDATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16085200312/29/2020AS SHOWNEISEISALCDESIGNED OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA (DORA) LEGEND DATA TABLE PROPOSED DORA AREAS TOTAL LOT AREA: 79,060 SF DORA REQUIRED (12% LOT AREA):9,487 SF DORA PROVIDED (17.1% GROSS BUILDING AREA): 13,550 SF= 12,785 SF+765 SF ROOF DECK (NOT SHOWN) City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 56 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 14 9:00 AM SPRING/FALL EQUINOX MARCH 21 SUMMER SOLSTICE JUNE 21 WINTER SOLSTICE DECEMBER 22 12:00 PM 3:00 PMSHADOW STUDY SHADOW STUDY City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 57 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 18 LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING CLASSI-GLASS CLASSI-BRICK CLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING MTL OVERHEAD DOOR CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A B D E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checkedby: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN EE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN AA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1 KKeeyy PPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal (TOWNHOMES) ELEVATIONS E XTERIOR ELEVATION E EXTERIOR ELEVATION A LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-1 1/8"3'-9"CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I-GLASS CLASS I-BRICK CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING MTL OVERHEAD DOOR CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED METAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A B D E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN EE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN AA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-GLASSCLASSI-BRICKCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGMTL OVERHEAD DOORCLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METAL CANOPY CLASS I: BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A B D E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN EE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN AA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSI-GLASS CLASSI-BRICK CLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING MTL OVERHEAD DOOR CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A BD E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNEE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNFF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNAA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12% Grandtotal MATERIAL CALC- EXTERIOR ELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASS I: GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 193.28 4% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 784.14 18% Grand total MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK528.2358% CLASSI:GLASS10011% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 303% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.2528% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNGG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK540.4960% CLASSI:GLASS708% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.933% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.3929% Grandtotal LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-97/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-GLASSCLASSI-BRICKCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGMTL OVERHEAD DOORCLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPYCLASSI:BRICKMETAL BALCONYCLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A BD E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.comIssue:Date:Project#:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-04701/28/15AuthorChecker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNEE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNFF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNAA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION EMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41%CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12%Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIAL CALC- EXTERIOR ELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 613.97 35% CLASS I: GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 78.13 4% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 160.77 9% Grand total MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK528.2358% CLASSI:GLASS10011% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 303% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.2528% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI:46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNGG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK540.4960% CLASSI:GLASS708% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.933% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.3929% Grandtotal LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-GLASSCLASSI-BRICKCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGMTL OVERHEAD DOORCLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A BD E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNEE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNFF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNAA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK528.2358% CLASSI:GLASS10011% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 303% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.2528% Grandtotal MATERIAL CALC- EXTERIOR ELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 582.62 38% CLASS I: GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 457.59 30% Grand total 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNGG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK540.4960% CLASSI:GLASS708% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.933% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.3929% Grandtotal LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSI-GLASS CLASSI-BRICK CLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING MTL OVERHEAD DOOR CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A BD E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNEE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNAA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIAL CALC- EXTERIOR ELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASS I: GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 490.8 12% Grand total MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASS I: 46%CLASS II: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSI-GLASS CLASSI-BRICK CLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING MTL OVERHEAD DOOR CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A BD E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNEE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNFF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNAA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIAL CALC- EXTERIOR ELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 528.23 58% CLASS I: GLASS 100 11% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 30 3% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 255.25 28% Grand total MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNGG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123'-8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-1 1/8" 3'-9" CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I-GLASS CLASS I-BRICK CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING MTLOVERHEADDOOR CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED METAL LEVEL 1 100'-0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METALBALCONY LEVEL1 100'-0" LEVEL2 110'-9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123'-8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASS I: BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100'-0" LEVEL2 110'-9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123'-8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I -BRICK CLASS I -GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED METAL CLASS II -PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100'-0" LEVEL2 110'-9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123'-8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS II -PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSSBEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-1 1/8" 3'-9" CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I -BRICK CLASS I -GLASS CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED METAL A B C D E F G Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CCCC BBBB AAAADDDD 4444 3333 2222 1111 333 WashingtonAve N, Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEEEFFFF 5555 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas,St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONEEXTERIOR ELEVATIONEEXTERIOR ELEVATIONEEXTERIOR ELEVATIONE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4EXTERIORELEVATIONFEXTERIORELEVATIONFEXTERIORELEVATIONFEXTERIORELEVATIONF 1/8"=1'-0"E3 EXTERIORELEVATION AEXTERIORELEVATION AEXTERIORELEVATION AEXTERIORELEVATION A 1/8"= 1'-0"C1 EXTERIORELEVATIONBEXTERIORELEVATIONBEXTERIORELEVATIONBEXTERIORELEVATIONB 1/8"= 1'-0"C2 EXTERIORELEVATIONDEXTERIORELEVATIONDEXTERIORELEVATIONDEXTERIORELEVATIOND1/8"= 1'-0"D2 EXTERIORELEVATIONGEXTERIORELEVATIONGEXTERIORELEVATIONGEXTERIORELEVATIONG 1/8"= 1'-0"D1 EXTERIORELEVATIONCEXTERIORELEVATIONCEXTERIORELEVATIONCEXTERIORELEVATIONC MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 763.17 26% CLASSI:GLASS 447.74 16% CLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,181.54 41% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 17% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,054.04 29% CLASSI:GLASS 1,146.89 32% CLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 19% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 5% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 547.68 15% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK528.2358% CLASSI:GLASS10011% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 303% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.2528% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 519.7 34% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 492.35 33% Grandtotal MATERIAL CALC- EXTERIOR ELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 540.49 60% CLASS I: GLASS 70 8% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 29.93 3% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 267.39 29% Grand total MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION C MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 532.76 59% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 28.1 3% CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 249.28 27% Grandtotal 42%CLASS I: 58 %CLASS II: 61 %CLASS I: 39 %CLASS II: 49 %CLASS I: 51 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 70 %CLASS I: 30 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KeyPlanKeyPlanKeyPlanKeyPlan---- ElevationsElevationsElevationsElevations TOWNHOMES- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS BEING USED FOR UP TO 10% OF CLASS I EXTERIOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT OF 60% OF THE EXTERIOR FACE. FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS BEING USED FOR UP TO 10% OF CLASS I EXTERIOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT OF 60% OF THE EXTERIOR FACE. City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 58 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 19 LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING CLASSI-GLASS CLASSI-BRICK CLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING MTL OVERHEAD DOOR CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A B D E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checkedby: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN EE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN AA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION E MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41% CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1 KKeeyy PPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal (TOWNHOMES) ELEVATIONS SCALE: 1/16” = 1’-0” LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-97/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-GLASSCLASSI-BRICKCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGMTL OVERHEAD DOORCLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETALLEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSS BEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETALCLASS I: BRICKCLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDINGCLASS I:GLASSMETAL BALCONY LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPYCLASSI:BRICKMETAL BALCONYCLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I -BRICK CLASS I -GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHED METAL CLASS II -PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSS BEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-BRICKCLASSI-GLASSCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGWALKWAYABDEFG LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 443322 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.comIssue:Date:Project#:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka & Texas, St.Louis Park, MN19-04701/28/15AuthorChecker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNEE1/8"= 1'-0"F4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNFF1/8"= 1'-0"E3EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNAA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION EMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41%CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12%Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION AMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34%CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18%Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION FMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK528.2358% CLASSI:GLASS10011% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 303% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.2528% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION DMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI:46%CLASSII:63 %CLASS I:37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONNGG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIALAREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK540.4960% CLASSI:GLASS708% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.933% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.3929% Grandtotal EXTERIOR ELEVATION B LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-97/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-GLASSCLASSI-BRICKCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGMTL OVERHEAD DOORCLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPYCLASSI:BRICKMETAL BALCONYCLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS II -PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS CLASS II-FIBER CEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A BD E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.comIssue:Date:Project#:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-04701/28/15AuthorChecker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN EE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN AA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION EMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41%CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12%Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION AMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI:46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-GLASSCLASSI-BRICKCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGMTL OVERHEAD DOORCLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I: GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPY CLASSI:BRICK METAL BALCONY CLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A BD E F G LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN EE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3EEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN AA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION EMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41%CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12%Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION A MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34% CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI: 46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1KKeeyyPPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal EXTERIOR ELEVATION D EXTERIOR ELEVATION F LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TRUSSBEARING119' -11"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"10'-9 7/8"9'-11/8" 3'-9" CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSI-GLASSCLASSI-BRICKCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDINGMTL OVERHEAD DOORCLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASS I:GLASS METAL BALCONY LEVEL1100' -0"LEVEL2110' -9 7/8"TOP OF PARAPET123' -8"23'-8"12'-10 1/8"10'-9 7/8"METALCANOPYCLASSI:BRICKMETAL BALCONYCLASS II-PRE-FINISHEDMTL SIDINGCLASSII-FIBERCEMENTSIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS METAL BALCONY CLASSII-PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII-PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING LEVEL1 100' -0" LEVEL2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-11/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASSII-PREFINISHED MTL SIDING CLASSI-BRICK CLASSI-GLASS CLASSII-FIBERCEMENT SIDING WALKWAY A B D E F G LEVEL 1 100' -0" LEVEL 2 110' -9 7/8" TRUSS BEARING 119' -11" TOP OF PARAPET 123' -8"23'-8"3'-9"9'-1 1/8"10'-9 7/8"CLASS I-BRICK CLASS I-GLASS WALKWAY Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 4433 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.comIssue:Date:Project#:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSMinnetonka &Texas, St.LouisPark,MN19-04701/28/15AuthorChecker Texa Tonka1/8"=1'-0"D4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN EE 1/8"= 1'-0"F4 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN FF 1/8"= 1'-0"E3 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN AA 1/8" = 1'-0"C1 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN BB 1/8" = 1'-0"C2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN DD MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION EMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,706.4 41%CLASSI:GLASS 562.81 13%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,430.46 34%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 490.8 12%Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION AMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 1,501.57 34%CLASSI:GLASS 1,284.89 29%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 667.93 15%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 193.28 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 784.14 18% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION B MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 613.97 35% CLASSI:GLASS 563.64 32% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 349.22 20% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 78.13 4% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 160.77 9% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION F MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 528.23 58% CLASSI:GLASS 100 11% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 30 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 255.25 28% Grandtotal MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION D MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 582.62 38% CLASSI:GLASS 223.89 15% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 275.79 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 457.59 30% Grandtotal 54%CLASSI:46%CLASSII: 63 %CLASS I: 37 %CLASS II: 53 %CLASS I: 47 %CLASS II: 67 %CLASS I: 33 %CLASS II: 68 %CLASS I: 32 %CLASS II: 65 %CLASS I: 35 %CLASS II: 1"=30'-0"1 KKeeyy PPllaann--EElleevvaattiioonnss 1/8"= 1'-0"2 EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN GG MATERIALCALC-EXTERIORELEVATION G MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 540.49 60% CLASSI:GLASS 70 8% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 29.93 3% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 267.39 29% Grandtotal EXTERIOR ELEVATION G TOWNHOMES- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 59 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 24 LEVEL1 101' -0" LEVEL2 112' -5 7/8" LEVELP1 90'-0" LEVEL3 122' -11" LEVEL4 133' -4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142'-6"11'-0"11'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"10'-5 7/8" 9'-1 1/8" 7'-0"59'-6"WALKOUT UNITS CLASS I:BRICK CLASSII:FIBERCEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL SIDING CLASSI:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASS I:GLASS FIBERCEMENTSIDINGISBEINGUSEDFORUPTO 10%OFCLASS IEXTERIORMATERIALREQUIREMENT OF60%OFTHEEXTERIORFACE. LEVEL 1 101'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-5 7/8" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133'-4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142'-6"48'-1"6'-7"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSI:BRICKVENEER CLASSI:BRICKDETAIL CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETALSIDING CLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING- LAPSIDING CLASSI:GLASS LEVEL 1 101' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -5 7/8" LEVEL P1 90' -0" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133' -4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142' -6" CLASS I: BRICK VENEER WALKOUT UNIT, TYP CLASS I: BRICK DETAILING CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED BRONZE CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II:PRE-FINISHED METAL SIDING CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED BRONZE 6'-6 25/32"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"53'-0"AVERAGE GRADE LINE CLASS I: GLASS METAL CANOPY CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP METAL CANOPY LIGHT SCONCE METAL ACCENT PILASTER LEVEL 1 101'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-5 7/8" LEVEL P1 90'-0" LEVEL 3 122'-11" LEVEL 4 133'-4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142'-6"59'-6"7'-0"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"11'-0"CLASS I: BRICK CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL SIDING CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASSI:GLASS FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS BEING USED FOR UP TO 10% OF CLASS I EXTERIOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT OF 60% OF THE EXTERIOR FACE.Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington Ave N,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: Ihereby certify thatthisplan,specification,or report was preparedby me or under mydirect supervision and thatIama dulyLicensed Architect underthelaws oftheState of Minnesota. SIGNATURE REGISTRATIONNUMBER DATE PRINTNAME NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSStLouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa TonkaApprover Designer IssueDate 3/32"=1'-0"F3 EEAASSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"B1 SSOOUUTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F5 WWEESSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F1 NNOORRTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 6,248.43 38% CLASS I: GLASS 5,159.08 31% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 1,414.58 9% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 1,063.68 6% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 2,514.57 15% Grand total EASTEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 5,370.98 35% CLASSI:GLASS 3,501.95 23% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 2,578.48 17% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 848.42 6% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 2,893.75 19% Grandtotal NORTHEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:GLASS 1,106.31 22% CLASSI:BRICK 1,450 28% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,180.85 23% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 903.19 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE 484 9% Grandtotal SOUTHEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,359 30% CLASSI:GLASS 1,405.14 31% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 616.91 14% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 398 9% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 785.67 17% Grandtotal 15,193.58SF CLASSI:58 % CLASSII:42 % CLASSI:61 % CLASSII:39 % 4,167.67 SF CLASS I:50 % CLASS II:50 % 5,124.35 SF 10,151.91 SF CLASS I: 69 % CLASS II: 31 % LEVEL 1 101' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -5 7/8" LEVEL P1 90' -0" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133' -4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142' -6"11'-0"11'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"10'-5 7/8" 9'-1 1/8" 7'-0"59'-6"WALKOUT UNITS CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL SIDING CLASS I: PRE-FINISHED METAL CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED BRONZE CLASS I: GLASS FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS BEING USED FOR UP TO 10% OF CLASS I EXTERIOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT OF 60% OF THE EXTERIOR FACE. LEVEL 1 101'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-5 7/8" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133'-4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142'-6"48'-1"6'-7"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSI:BRICKVENEER CLASSI:BRICKDETAIL CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETALSIDING CLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING- LAPSIDING CLASSI:GLASS LEVEL 1 101'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-5 7/8" LEVEL P1 90'-0" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133'-4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142'-6" CLASSI:BRICKVENEER WALKOUTUNIT, TYP CLASSI:BRICKDETAILING CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II:PRE-FINISHED METAL SIDING CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE 6'-6 25/32"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"53'-0"AVERAGEGRADELINE CLASSI:GLASS METALCANOPY CLASSII: FIBERCEMENTSIDING- SHIPLAP METALCANOPY LIGHTSCONCE METALACCENTPILASTER LEVEL 1 101'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-5 7/8" LEVEL P1 90'-0" LEVEL 3 122'-11" LEVEL 4 133'-4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142'-6"59'-6"7'-0"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"11'-0"CLASS I: BRICK CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL SIDING CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASSI:GLASS FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS BEING USED FOR UP TO 10% OF CLASS I EXTERIOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT OF 60% OF THE EXTERIOR FACE.Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington Ave N,Suite 210 Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401 612.676.2700www.djr-inc.com Issue:Date: Project#: Date: Drawn by: Checked by: Ihereby certify thatthisplan,specification,or report was preparedby me or under mydirect supervision and thatIama dulyLicensed Architect underthelaws oftheState of Minnesota. SIGNATURE REGISTRATIONNUMBER DATE PRINTNAME NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSStLouisPark,MN19-047 01/28/15 Author Checker Texa TonkaApprover Designer IssueDate 3/32" = 1'-0"F3 EEAASSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"B1 SSOOUUTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F5 WWEESSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F1 NNOORRTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN WESTEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 6,248.43 38% CLASSI:GLASS 5,159.08 31% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,414.58 9% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 1,063.68 6% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 2,514.57 15% Grandtotal EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 5,370.98 35% CLASS I: GLASS 3,501.95 23% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 2,578.48 17% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 848.42 6% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 2,893.75 19% Grand total NORTHEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:GLASS 1,106.31 22% CLASSI:BRICK 1,450 28% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,180.85 23% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 903.19 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE 484 9% Grandtotal SOUTHEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,359 30% CLASSI:GLASS 1,405.14 31% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 616.91 14% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 398 9% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 785.67 17% Grandtotal 15,193.58 SF CLASS I: 58 % CLASS II: 42 % CLASSI:61 % CLASSII:39 % 4,167.67 SF CLASS I:50 % CLASS II:50 % 5,124.35 SF 10,151.91SF CLASSI:69% CLASSII:31% BUILDING ELEVATIONS EAST/WEST ELEVATIONS WEST ELEVATION EAST ELEVATION City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 60 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 25 BUILDING ELEVATIONS NORTH/SOUTH ELEVATIONS LEVEL1101' -0"LEVEL2112' -5 7/8"LEVELP190'-0"LEVEL3122' -11"LEVEL4133' -4 7/8"ROOF TRUSS BEARING142' -6"11'-0"11'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"10'-5 7/8" 9'-1 1/8" 7'-0"59'-6"WALKOUTUNITSCLASS I:BRICKCLASSII:FIBERCEMENT SIDING-SHIP LAPCLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL SIDINGCLASSI:PRE-FINISHEDMETALCLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZECLASS I:GLASS FIBERCEMENTSIDINGISBEINGUSEDFORUPTO10%OFCLASSI EXTERIORMATERIALREQUIREMENTOF60%OFTHEEXTERIORFACE. LEVEL 1 101' -0" LEVEL 2 112'-5 7/8" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133'-4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142' -6"48'-1"6'-7"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSI:BRICKVENEER CLASSI:BRICKDETAIL CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETALSIDING CLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING- LAPSIDING CLASSI:GLASS LEVEL 1101' -0"LEVEL 2112' -5 7/8"LEVEL P190'-0"LEVEL 3122'-11"LEVEL 4133' -4 7/8"ROOF TRUSS BEARING142' -6"CLASSI:BRICKVENEERWALKOUTUNIT, TYPCLASSI:BRICKDETAILINGCLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZECLASS I: BRICKCLASS II:PRE-FINISHED METAL SIDINGCLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE 6'-6 25/32"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"53'-0"AVERAGEGRADELINECLASSI:GLASSMETALCANOPYCLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING-SHIP LAP METALCANOPYLIGHTSCONCEMETALACCENTPILASTER LEVEL 1 101' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -5 7/8" LEVEL P1 90' -0" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133' -4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142' -6"59'-6"7'-0"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"11'-0"CLASS I: BRICK CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED BRONZE CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL SIDING CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED BRONZE CLASS I: GLASS FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS BEING USED FOR UP TO 10% OF CLASS I EXTERIOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT OF 60% OF THE EXTERIOR FACE. Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 4433 22 11 333Washington AveN,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.comIssue:Date:Project#:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:Ihereby certify thatthis plan,specification,orreport waspreparedby meorunder mydirect supervision and thatIama dulyLicensed Architect underthelaws oftheState of Minnesota.SIGNATUREREGISTRATIONNUMBER DATEPRINTNAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSStLouis Park, MN19-04701/28/15AuthorChecker Texa TonkaApproverDesigner IssueDate3/32"=1'-0"F3 EEAASSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"B1 SSOOUUTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F5 WWEESSTT EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F1 NNOORRTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN WESTEXTERIORELEVATIONMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 6,248.43 38%CLASSI:GLASS 5,159.08 31%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,414.58 9%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 1,063.68 6%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 2,514.57 15%Grandtotal EASTEXTERIORELEVATIONMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 5,370.98 35%CLASSI:GLASS 3,501.95 23%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 2,578.48 17%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 848.42 6%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 2,893.75 19%Grandtotal NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: GLASS 1,106.31 22% CLASS I: BRICK 1,450 28% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 1,180.85 23% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 903.19 18% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED BRONZE 484 9% Grand total SOUTHEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 1,359 30% CLASSI:GLASS 1,405.14 31% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 616.91 14% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 398 9% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 785.67 17% Grandtotal 15,193.58SFCLASSI:58 %CLASSII:42 % CLASSI:61 % CLASSII:39 % 4,167.67 SF CLASS I: 50 % CLASS II: 50 % 5,124.35 SF 10,151.91SFCLASSI:69%CLASSII:31% LEVEL1 101' -0" LEVEL2 112' -5 7/8" LEVELP1 90'-0" LEVEL3 122' -11" LEVEL4 133' -4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142' -6"11'-0"11'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"10'-5 7/8" 9'-1 1/8" 7'-0"59'-6"WALKOUT UNITS CLASS I:BRICK CLASSII:FIBERCEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL SIDING CLASSI:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASS I:GLASS FIBERCEMENTSIDINGISBEINGUSEDFORUPTO 10%OFCLASSIEXTERIORMATERIALREQUIREMENT OF60%OFTHEEXTERIORFACE. LEVEL 1 101' -0" LEVEL 2 112' -5 7/8" LEVEL 3 122' -11" LEVEL 4 133' -4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142' -6"48'-1"6'-7"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL CLASS I: BRICK VENEER CLASS I: BRICK DETAIL CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL SIDING CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING- LAP SIDING CLASS I: GLASS LEVEL 1101' -0"LEVEL 2112' -5 7/8"LEVEL P190'-0"LEVEL 3122'-11"LEVEL 4133' -4 7/8"ROOF TRUSS BEARING142' -6"CLASSI:BRICKVENEERWALKOUTUNIT, TYPCLASSI:BRICKDETAILINGCLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZECLASS I: BRICKCLASS II:PRE-FINISHED METAL SIDINGCLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE 6'-6 25/32"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"53'-0"AVERAGEGRADELINECLASSI:GLASSMETALCANOPYCLASSII:FIBERCEMENTSIDING-SHIPLAP METALCANOPYLIGHTSCONCEMETALACCENTPILASTER LEVEL 1 101'-0" LEVEL 2 112'-5 7/8" LEVEL P1 90'-0" LEVEL 3 122'-11" LEVEL 4 133'-4 7/8" ROOF TRUSS BEARING 142'-6"59'-6"7'-0"9'-1 1/8"10'-5 7/8"10'-5 1/8"11'-5 7/8"11'-0"CLASS I: BRICK CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING- SHIP LAP CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL SIDING CLASSII:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE CLASSI:GLASS FIBER CEMENT SIDING IS BEING USED FOR UP TO 10% OF CLASS I EXTERIOR MATERIAL REQUIREMENT OF 60% OF THE EXTERIOR FACE.Copyright2019DJRArchitecture,Inc.CC BB AADD 44 33 22 11 333Washington Ave N,Suite 210Minneapolis,Minnesota 55401612.676.2700www.djr-inc.comIssue:Date:Project#:Date:Drawn by:Checked by:Ihereby certify thatthis plan,specification,orreport waspreparedby meorunder mydirect supervision and thatIama dulyLicensed Architect underthelaws oftheState of Minnesota.SIGNATUREREGISTRATIONNUMBER DATEPRINTNAMENOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOTFORCONSTRUCTIONEEFF 55 A200EXTERIORELEVATIONSStLouis Park, MN19-04701/28/15AuthorChecker Texa TonkaApproverDesigner IssueDate 3/32"=1'-0"F3EEAASSTTEEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"B1 SSOOUUTTHH EEXXTTEERRIIOORR EELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F5WWEESSTTEEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN 3/32" = 1'-0"F1NNOORRTTHHEEXXTTEERRIIOORREELLEEVVAATTIIOONN WESTEXTERIORELEVATIONMATERIALAREA PERCENTAGECLASSI:BRICK 6,248.43 38%CLASSI:GLASS 5,159.08 31%CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,414.58 9%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 1,063.68 6%CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 2,514.57 15%Grandtotal EASTEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:BRICK 5,370.98 35% CLASSI:GLASS 3,501.95 23% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 2,578.48 17% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 848.42 6% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMTLSIDING 2,893.75 19% Grandtotal NORTHEXTERIORELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASSI:GLASS 1,106.31 22% CLASSI:BRICK 1,450 28% CLASS II:FIBERCEMENTSIDING 1,180.85 23% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDMETAL 903.19 18% CLASS II:PRE-FINISHEDBRONZE 484 9% Grandtotal SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION MATERIAL AREA PERCENTAGE CLASS I: BRICK 1,359 30% CLASS I: GLASS 1,405.14 31% CLASS II: FIBER CEMENT SIDING 616.91 14% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED METAL 398 9% CLASS II: PRE-FINISHED MTL SIDING 785.67 17% Grand total 15,193.58SF CLASSI:58 % CLASSII:42 % CLASS I: 61 % CLASS II: 39 % 4,167.67 SF CLASS I:50 % CLASS II:50 % 5,124.35 SF 10,151.91SFCLASSI:69%CLASSII:31% NORTH ELEVATION City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 61 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 26 RENDERS View At Texas Avenue Along Minnetonka Boulevard CORNER VIEW City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 62 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 27 DUSK VIEW RENDERS View from Texas Ave S looking Northwest City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 63 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 28 DRIVE WAY VIEW RENDERS View from Texas Ave S looking East City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 64 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 29 TOWNHOME VIEWS RENDERS View from Texas Ave S looking Southeast City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 65 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 30 PARK VIEW RENDERS City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 66 © 2020 DJR Architecture Minnetonka and Texas 19 -047.00 St. Louis Park, Minnesota 12.29.2020 31 AERIAL VIEW RENDERS City council meeting of February 1, 2021 (Item No. 8a) Title: Texa-Tonka Apartments Page 67