Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2020/09/08 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Regular
AGENDA SEPT. 8, 2020 All meetings of the St. Louis Park City Council will be conducted by telephone or other electronic means starting March 30, 2020, and until further notice. This is in accordance with a local emergency declaration issued by the city council, in response to the coronavirus (COVID -19) pandemic and Governor Walz's “Stay Safe MN” executive order 20-056. Special study session at 5:30 p.m. The St. Louis Park City Council will meet by videoconference for a special study session Tuesday, Sept. 8, at 5:30 p.m. to discuss the Dakota -Edgewood Trail Bridge project. Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports. Members of the public can monitor the meeting by video and audio at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil or by calling 1.312.535.8110 and using access code 372 106 61 for audio only. EDA meeting at 6:25 p.m.; regular meeting at 6:30 p.m. Following the special study session, some or all members of the St. Louis Park City Council will participate in the Tuesday, Sept. 8, 6:30 p.m. city council meeting by electronic device or telephone rather than by being personally present at the city council's regular meeting place at 5005 Minnetonka Blvd. Visit bit.ly/slpccagendas to view the agenda and reports . Members of the public can monitor the EDA and regular meeting by video and audio at bit.ly/watchslpcouncil and on local cable (Comcast SD channel 17 and HD channel 859, or CenturyLink SD channel 8117 and HD channel 8617) For audio only call +1.312.535.8110 and use access code 372 106 61. Members of the public who want to address the city council during the regular meeting about items on the agenda should call the number noted below next to the corresponding item. Call when the meeting starts at 6:30 p.m. and follow instructions provided. Comments will be taken during each item in the order they are received and must relate to an item on the current city council agenda. • 952.562.2886 – consent agenda items 4a -4i • 952.562.2888 – item 6a – vacate portions of unused utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Blvd. • 952.562.2887 – item 8a – Bid tab for Dakota -Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 • 952.562.2886 – item 8b – Council ward 2 seat resignation and vacancy 5:30 p.m. SPECIAL STUDY SESSION Discussion item 1. 5:30 p.m. Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge 6:25 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1. Call to order 2. Roll call 3. Approval of minutes 3a. EDA minutes of August 3, 2020 5. Reports 5a. Approval of EDA disbursement claims Recommended action: Accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of July 25, through August 28, 2020. Meeting of Sept. 8, 20 20 City c ouncil agenda 6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING 1. Call to order 1a. Pledge of allegiance 1b. Roll call 2. Presentations 2a. Recognition of donations 3. Approval of minutes 3a. Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 3b. Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 3c. City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 3d. Study session meeting minutes of August 10, 2020 4. Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar Recommended action: **Motion to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove items from the agenda , or move items from consent calendar to regular agenda for discussion.) 4a. A ccept for filing city disbursement claims for the p eriod of July 25, thru August 28, 2020. 4b . Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance vacating portions of 14th Street right-of- way east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. 4c. Approve the minor amendment to the special permit for landscaping improvements to the West End Office Park. 4d . Adopt resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from CenterPoint Energy to allow the police department to purchase a Portable Data Network. 4e . Approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and United States Marshals Service for the 2021Presidential Inauguration. 4f . Adopt Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance. 4g . Approve the amended and restated agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and the St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau dba Discover St. Louis Park. 4h. Adopt Resolution authorizing expenditures of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority. 4i . Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of grant funding from the Hennepin County “Save the Summer” grant program in the amount of $44,466 to help with funding for Westwood Hills Nature Center and playground summer camps, youth sports leagues, Park At Home activity packs and the Aquatic Center season opening. 5. Boards and commissions -- None 6. Public hearings 6a. Request to vacate portions of unused utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard Recommended action: Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close the public hearing. Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance vacating portions of utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard and set the Second Reading of an Ordinance for September 21, 2020. (Requires five affirmative votes.) Meeting of Sept. 8, 20 20 City c ouncil agenda 7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – None 8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items 8a. Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Recommended action: • Motion to designate Redstone Construction, LLC the lowest responsible bidder and authorize a contract with the firm in the amount of $7,340,684.26 for Dakota - Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000. • Motion to approve the construction administration services contract with SRF Consulting Group, Inc in the amount of $836,973. 8b . Council ward 2 seat resignation and vacancy Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution accepting Councilmember Anne Mavity’s resignation for Ward 2 effective October 31, 2020 and declare a vacancy of Ward 2 city council seat effective October 31, 2020. 9. Communications – None **NOTE : The consent calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a councilmember or a member of the public, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion. St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular city council meetings are carried live on civic TV cable channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for video on demand replays. During the COVID-19 pandemic, agendas will be posted on Fridays on the entrance doors to city hall and on the text display on civic TV cable channel 17. The agenda and full packet are available after noon on Friday on the city’s website. If you need special accommodations or have questions about the meeting, please call 952-924-2525. Meeting: Special study session Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Discussion item : 1 Executive summary Title: Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge Recommended action: None – this discussion is intended to help inform council as it considers formal action on this project during the regular council meeting later in the evening. Policy consideration: Not applicable for the study session conversation. Summary: During the regular council meeting on Tuesday, September 8 the city council will be asked to consider action on awarding the contract for the Dakota/Edgewood trail bridge proj ect. Give n the questions and comments raised at the August 17 council meeting, this special study session is being he ld prior to the regular meeting to allow for continued discussion on the project, and in particular discuss the financing of this project in the larger context of other capital projects, funding, and debt service needs in the future. To prepare for th is s pecial study session discussion please review the staff report contained in the agenda for the regular meeting. Additional information will be provided during the special study session to assist with the conversation. Financial or budget considerations: This project will require the use of G.O. bonds as a primary funding source. G.O. bonds for p roj ects lik e t his can be issued in different ways. One mechanism is to issue the bonds unde r the authority provided by the city’s Charter. Using this approach streamlines the process and requires at least 6 of 7 councilmember to vote in favor of the bond issuance (not the project itself). Another approach is to use authority provided by statute for the issuance of G.O. bonds. This process requires more administrative processes and a public hearing. A simple majority is required for the bonds to be issued in t his w ay . This approach was used to issue G.O. bonds for the recent Nature Center project. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options f or people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: See item 8a the regular city council meeting agenda Prepared by: Tom Harmening, city manager Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes EDA meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota August 3, 2020 1. Call to order President Harris called the meeting to order at 6:20 p.m. 2. Roll call Commissioners present: President Harris, Tim Brausen, Larry Kraft, Anne Mavity, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog. Commissioners absent: Jake Spano Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), Police Chief Harcey, Operations & Recreation Director (Ms. Walsh), Recreations & Facilities Supervisor (Ms. Shingles), Community Development Director (Ms. Barton), City Attorney (Mr. Knutson), Housing Supervisor/Deputy Community Development Director (Ms. Schnitker), Assistant Housing Supervisor (Ms. Olson), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas). 3. Approval of minutes 3a. EDA minutes of July 6, 2020 It was moved by Commissioner Rog, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve the July 6, 2020 minutes as presented. The motion passed 6-0 (Commissioner Spano absent). 4. Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Rog, to approve the EDA agenda as presented and the items on the consent calendar. The motion passed 6-0 (Commissioner Spano absent). 5. Reports - none 6. Old business - none 7. New business - none 8. Communications – none Economic development authority meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: EDA meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 9. Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 6:23 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, secretary Rachel Harris, president Meeting: Economic development authority Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 5a Executive summary Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of July 25, through August 28, 2020. Policy consideration: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA bylaws? Summary: The finance division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: EDA disbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk Reviewed by: Melanie Lammers, chief financial officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:51:58R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 280,278.214800 EXCELSIOR APARTMENTS LLC 4900 EXC BLVD TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 280,278.21 228,691.80BRIDGEWATER BANK SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 228,691.80 165,715.74CEDAR LAKE ROAD APARTMENTS LLC ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 165,715.74 290.33CENTERPOINT ENERGY MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES ELECTRIC SERVICE 290.33 7,522.92CKJ PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,522.92 1,109,544.08DUKE REALTY WEST END TIF DIST G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 1,109,544.08 4,650.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 665.504900 EXC BLVD TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 668.50ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 915.50WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 665.50ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 445.00PARK CENTER HOUSING G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 665.50CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 665.50MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 665.50PARK COMMONS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 312.50ELMWOOD VILLAGE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00HOIGAARD VILLAGE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 312.50WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 665.50SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 710.00AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 665.50HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,922.50 83,062.87ELLIPSE II LLC ELLIPSE II G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 83,062.87 2,317.81ESRIDEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING 2,317.81 Economic development authority meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 2 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:51:58R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 558,984.41GOTTMAR II LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 558,984.41 718,691.94GOTTMAR LLC PARK COMMONS G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 718,691.94 798.00GREEN HORIZONS 7015 WALKER-RYNLDS WELDING LAND MAINTENANCE 660.00BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LAND MAINTENANCE 166.86WOODDALE STATION TIF DIST LAND MAINTENANCE 1,137.14MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES LAND MAINTENANCE 922.50HWY 7 & LOUISIANA LAND MAINTENANCE 3,684.50 68,743.13HIGHWAY 7 BUSINESS CENTER LLC HWY 7 BUSINESS CENTER G & A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 68,743.13 5,221.25HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING 5,221.25 2,781.60KENNEDY & GRAVEN BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LEGAL SERVICES 4,293.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES 7,074.60 2,814.00REDPATH & COMPANY DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 2,814.00 332.50SEHHWY 7 & LOUISIANA SURVEYING 332.50 267,747.93SIDAL REALTY CO LTD PARTNERSHIP LLLP MILL CITY G&A DEVELOPER TAX INCREMNT PYMT 267,747.93 14,950.62ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB 14,950.62 20,000.00ST LOUIS PARK FRIENDS OF THE ARTS PUBLIC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,000.00 3,000.00TWIN CITIES FILM FEST DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING 3,000.00 Economic development authority meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 3 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:51:58R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description Report Totals 3,561,591.14 Economic development authority meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 5a) Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 4 Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Presentation: 2 a Executive summary Title: Recognition of donations Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as Time Sensitive** • Mayor to announce and express thanks and appreciation for the following donations being accepted at the meeting and listed on the consent agenda: From Donation For CenterPoint Energy $1,600 Purchase of a portable data network (PDA) for the police department. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: None Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Minutes: 3a Unofficial minutes City council study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota July 13, 2020 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Anne Mavity, Nadia Mohamed, and Margare t Rog Councilmembers absent: none Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Director of Operations and Recreation (Ms. Walsh), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Fire Chief Koering, Public Works Superintendent (Mr. Hanson), Transportation Engineer (Mr. Manibog), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Racial Equity Manager (Mx . Sojourner), Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), Building & Energy Director (Mr. Ho ffman), Communications Manager (Ms. Smith), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas) 1. Racial equity update and check-in Mx . Sojourner led the council through a grounding exercise . They asked the councilmember to focus on the coming year and issues related to racial equity and policymaking. Councilmembers noted their thoughts: • Nervous about good intentions and unintended consequences • Want to expand relationship with bipoc community but not sure how to do this in an authentic way that’s not tokenizing • Want to be more deliberate about working on building relationships • Be effective in my new position that’s meaningful to residents and self • Feeling powerless with issues and concern about impacts on a meaningful scale • Fe eling humility and amazement as to how much you do not know, and so much more to learn • Real time for listening and understanding, putting things into action and not just words Mx. Sojourner stated staff is working to increas e recruitment for the bipoc population, as well as development and retention of talent within the city. Councilmember Rog asked if data and information on racial equity can be added to the city website . Mx . Sojourner stated this is planned for by the end of 2020, with information presented as a scorecard. Councilmember Kraft asked if anything was learned before 2019 about retention during exit interviews . Mx . Sojourner stated all employees do an exit interview upon leaving employment with the city. They noted HR, Mr. Harmening and Ms. De no have access to the exit interview information adding that department heads also see this information as well. Mr. Harmening City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 2 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 stated the exit information is shared and used as an opportunity to improve and grow within the department. Ms. Deno added this information also serves as a teachable moment for staff members. Councilmember Rog asked if staff works with the school district on internships and apprenticeships. Mx . Sojourner stated currently internships are paid and offered to college undergrads or highe r. Councilmember Rog asked if all managers and leadership do REI, and if they are optional or required. Mx . Sojourner stated all staff have one goal for themselves connected to racial equity, as well as a team goal. She added soon fellowships will be offered to staff which will become mandatory later for supervisors, managers and those aspiring to be as well. Mayor Spano stated staff might want to discuss internships with the Citizens League, noting this is an excellent program used by the state of Minn e sota. Mayor Spano asked how city employee recruitment practices have changed, noting the success of the Pathways to Policing program. Mx. Sojourner stated this involves job descriptions and how they are written, including education and skill requirements, as well as where jobs are posted, such as in diversity postings and with members of specific groups. They added in Minnesota, the bipoc community communicates to each other about where to work, where not to work, and about culture in workplace s. They stated the city provides interview panels that are racially and department diverse and include members of different races, ages, and genders. Mx. Sojourner added staff does internal bias training before the panels as well and is always reviewing this process. Mx. Sojourner told the council they are not creating goals tonight, but building their house, and reflecting on whose life will be made better as they work on policy . They asked them to think about whether they are creating more or less barriers f or bipoc members, what their role is here, how they communicate with bipoc residents, staff, and people who work in St. Louis Park, as well as what are the overall tools council will use to shift policy . They asked council to think about accountability as they build their house, and to think about creating a more just and inclusive community for all. They noted council will discuss this fu rther at their October group feedback session, as well as take the IDI survey again, to look at cultural comp etency and diversity inclusion. 2. Connect the Park discussion Mr. Walther presented council with a historical review of the Connect the Park project. Mr. Sullivan reviewed the 10-year plan, which began in 2014, and noted where the project is currently and where it is g oing. He noted the project is 2/3 of the way through as it connects the system, adding most of the funding is from general obligation bonds in conjunction with other transportation projects. Mr. Harmening stated this is an implementation plan , adding that most councilmembers were not on council when this was adopted. He asked the council to revisit it and discuss if the plan is still relevant, or if there is a need to start over or look at the plan differently . City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 3 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 Councilmember Mavity note d she and Mayor Spano were on the council when Connect the Park was approved. She asked staff about projects not shown on the map, and why those projects are not represented. Mr. Walther stated Councilmember Mavity is correct, the map shown only refers to the actual capital improvement plan and does not include all the planned segments and excludes some of the gaps that were connected within neighborhoods during the same time period. Ms. Heiser added the additional gap sidewalks added made costs different, so staff is showin g council only the parts of the project that were also part of the implementation plan , so there can be a direct comparison. Councilmember Mavity noted that was helpful adding it is important to continue to build out the plan as the council considers the next iteration. She added time and opportunity might be lost if the plan did not continue, especially now, at a time when folks are on bikes more than ever and bikes are sold out. She added there will also be need for prioritization and cost considerations. She stated council needs to first agree on what the goal is now, what the city is tryin g to accomplish , and if an updated goal is needed. She stated she supports continuing with Connect the Park. Councilmember Harris added there has been an evolution about bikers in St. Louis Park and new consideration for those who fit into the “intere sted but concerned” biking category. She noted one concern of council might be who will this be built for – the whole community, or those alre ady comfortable biking, confident bikers, or a combination of both. Mr. Walther stated Councilmember Harris described this accurately, adding the plan was focused on “interested but concerned” bikers and making improvements that would improve safety and encourage a large segment of the population that fit that category to choose biking, as well as to overcome physical barriers such as railroads, freeways, creeks and w etlands. Councilmember Harris stated it would be valuable to map out secondary routes next, being this the halfway mark of the plan. She also noted return on investment and is appreciative of innovation and the use of bollards. She stated she has seen more families biking on Texas Avenue where they have not in the past, and during this time of shelter in place, it seems parents feel safe bringing children out to bike on streets when there are fewer interactions with vehicles . She added this leads her to consider Louisiana Ave nue be ing rebuilt with a grade separated path for biking. Councilmember Harris added with trails she knows it varies f rom community to community, but she prefers working with Three Rivers Park District in order to create consistency on the grade crossings in Hopkins, Minnetonka, and St. Louis Park. She stated she is supportive of continuing to build out the plan. Councilme mber Kraft stated in principle he supports the project and would like to see it continue as soon as possible. He thanked staff and noted it is a great foundation. He also stated the purpose and goals need modification. Councilmember Kraft stated the developed network of bike and pedestrian routes, the interconnected network, linking to transit make this a success. However, he added, during the City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 4 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 Wooddale discussion engineering stated this was not necessarily the best option, but it was the next best thing in order to complete this segment. He stated goals will need to now be shifted to be more explicit, while acknowledging that things have changed over time. He added in changing the purpose and goals, it will require thinking about each segment and maximizing the number of non-car trips, while bringing data into each decision made . Councilmember Kraft added he would like to see cost impacts over time as well. Councilmember Rog stated outcomes and reframing will show what success looks like . She added the work is not completed and real success is in use that aligns with the city’s strategic priorities and climate goals . She stated she supports Connect the Park and wants more connectiv ity , adding it is worth investing in . She wondered, however, if the city is getting the best bang for the buck. She noted the several goals and stated it would be beneficial for the council to prioritize these goals: - Number of users, safety of users and comfort of users - Reduction of car trips, demographics of users, cost, trees, pavement, homeowners Councilmember Rog also suggested creating a check list which could serve as a clearer pathway for staff, as well as for making recommendations to council. She stated it behoove s the city to look at all connectivity projects as one project vs. separate d out. She stated lowering speed limits should be considered, as well as narrower streets, and car-free streets. She stated the city needs to expand thinking with the end goal of safer pedestrian and bike travel within the community. Councilmember Brause n thanked staff for their work on this. He noted that significant segments in Ward 4 on Cedar Lake Road, Louisiana, and Minnetonka Boulevard have not been addressed, citing safety issues, trees that would need to be removed, and large construction projects. He added he is not sure about the tradeoff, while the only priority he did not see included is racial equity and inclusion, which need to be part of the conversation. He stated there is much more bike traffic and a grid system makes sense; however, he does not want to re -prioritize the goals, adding Connect the Park supports the city’s strategic priorit ies. Councilmember Brausen stated there will also be budgetary considerations, and he is concerned about getting the most for the money spent and would prefer not to redevelop the whole plan and methods used. Councilmember Mohamed stated she is in favor of keeping the project going and looks forward to outcomes and moving forward. She added she would like to address racial equity as well and stated she had never had access to bikes before coming to America. She stated she would like to ask residents who are be ing encouraged to bike and walk, how they feel about these issues. Mayor Spano stated he is very much in favor of Connect the Park, and likes the trails, sidewalks and network. He noted he does, however, have concerns around core pieces of this plan which were crafted over a decade ago. He noted at that time , race equity was not a key strategic goal, and now the city is committed to this. He added there are concerns around cost as well and that the city will spend twice as much as originally thought versus 2013 estimates . Mayor Spano also noted concerns for which target biker this is being built for. He stated if for the interested but reluctant rider, w hich he considers himself, he would never ride on Dakota City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 5 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 or Wooddale. He added the plan’s target audience is the heavy-duty riders, or regular riders. He added the city has no data on whether this plan is achieving the goals, and he does not feel it is wise to continue. He stated if the city takes a pause on this, the council will need to revisit the goals of the plan. Mayor Spano also voiced concerns about the impact of the project on neighbors, adding he has felt neighbors were not closer or more bonded on this project. He stated they will need to stay more connected with residents if the goals change and create opportunities to bring neighbors together to talk about it. He stated they will also need to examine the project now from a race equity lens, look at costs and reinvent the public process. He added at this point, he cannot say if the project is working . Councilmember Rog added she supports the big picture view of the project, assuring alignment with city priorities and using data as it moves forward. She added there are also other things that should not be done any longer based on data, including no more painted lanes as data shows they are no longer needed. She suggested doing a scorecard on the project showing users, cost and priorities for today versus finishing the network. Councilmember Kraft stated he agreed especially with scorecards adding the big picture is important. He added this is also an area where the city can move the needle on the environmental side and get people out of cars. He stated this will be an important topic with having neighborhood discussions. He added he appreciates how costs have changed and wants to think differently about this moving forward, and not compare it any longer. Councilmember Brausen has concerns ove r cost as well, noting it has doubled. He added he is concerned about reimagining Connect the Park, noting there have been regular meetings and the community supports this. He added it might be best to start over versus pausing the program and reiterated there have been no connections created in Ward 4. Councilmember Harris added the return on investment and costs and outcomes are a concern, as well as public health and climate issu es if this program is no t built out. It was the consensus of the council to have several de eper conversations on this program, especially as it relates to race, data collection and costs, strategic priorities, biking and bike lanes, walking, and how people move around. Mr. Harmening added he sees the council is now less concerned about the project segments and more concerned about the bigger picture on what the program is trying to accomplish . He stated staff will come back to council on goals, priorities and the big picture and the request for data. 3. Prioritizing transit options/operations update Mr. Hanson reported . He stated staff had a conversation with Metropolitan Transit on developing a partnership for adding paved surfaces for bus stops in orde r to assist transit users to get off the roadway when waiting for the bus. This especially is a concern in winter months after large snowfalls . City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 6 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 Mr. Hanson explained how city staff opens the curb line at bus stops after a large snowfall. He noted the city only cleans a small number of these areas within the city but noted the city will conduct a pilot pro gram to have a crew clean 25% of the bus stop locations after snowfall. He stated these locations will be determined by city staff and they will work with Metro Transit as well. Councilmember Rog thanked Mr. Hanson for looking at realistic solutions and partnerships with Metro Transit. She stated she is supportive of the pilot program, and still has major concerns about bus stops, benches, and shelters that need cleaning 24 hours after snowfall. She noted the city prioritizes commuters that drive cars, but does not think about other commuters, the elderly , and disabled. Councilmember Rog added she would also like to include sidewalk travel in winter as part of this conversation and make walking a priority year-round with the city plowing all sidewalks. Councilmember Harris asked how the city landed on 25% of the sites for the pilot program and if more could be added. Mr. Hanson stated 25% will work on about 24 sites, in order to get feedback on the program. He added they would have to reassign crews if they went above 25% so staff felt this was a good pilot number to learn from. Afterwards, he noted, a proposal on costs and implementation can be put together. Councilmember Harris asked if the city has any choice on where Metro Transit puts bus stops or pavement. Mr. Hanson stated these are Metro Transit’s stops and their decisions. He added the city needs to engage with them to discuss partnerships and to better define what bus stops should look like. Councilmember Brausen stated he is supportive of the pilot and wants consideration for race equity inclusion and NOAH housing. Councilmember Mavity added she supports the pilot program and whate ver the city can do to ensure safety for pedestrians. Councilmember Kraft stated he is impressed with this approach. He asked if the pilot shows an increase in ridership, would moving bus stops be a consideration. Mr. Hanson stated this would be up to Me tro Transit. Councilmember Kraft adde d this would also need to be viewed through an equity lens. He added if pedestrians are a priority in the city, then it would be logical to clear all sidewalks, and he would like to pursue that conversation with the council. Councilmember Mohamed added she is very much in agreement with the program, stated it creatively ad dresses many issues at hand and should be discussed within the lens of racial equity. She is also in favor of clearing sidewalks as well and is very in terested in discussing this further. Mayor Spano stated he is also supportive of the pilot and wants to continue to press Metro Transit on clearing their bus stops and continue the conversation on them taking care of their customers . City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 7 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 Councilmember Rog stressed the importance of making city sidewalks walkable adding it is a strategic priority. She would like to discuss this again, asking how the city can justify not clearing sidewalks when it is part of the strategic plan. Councilmember Mavity stated she would not support this sidewalk clearing discussion at all, adding that the comp plan does say this, b ut does not say how the city accomplishes that. She stated this is not a priority now. It was the consensus of the council to support the pilot program. 4. COVID-19 pandemic: face coverings Ms. Solano stated some surrounding cities have implemented require ments of face coverings, including Minneapolis and Edina. She pointed to those cities’ resolutions in the council packet about how those cities are enforcing the requirement. Ms. Solano stated St. Louis Park has been conducting a face covering communications campaign and will continue to do so. Mx. Sojourner pointed out that with face coverings, there is some racial profiling now happening in St. Louis Park with the bipoc population, this is a concern to consider. Ms. Solano added enforcement will need to be considered as well, noting it might not be practical and can also increase higher anxiety, and confusion on expectations. Mayor Spano noted a group of mayors met with Governor Walz recently and the governor is considering a state-wide masking mandate so a decision will be forthcoming. He stated many businesses prefer a mask ordinance if it will help them stay open, and to avoid another shut down. He added the governor’s mandate could be statewide or a regional approach. Councilmember Mohamed stated she understands the importance of masks and why they are necessary; however, she is concerned if the policy is not enforceable, especially now when the council is discussing the cit y’s policing approach. She asked if we will not enforce this policy, is this just a piece of paper to pat ourselves on the back. She appreciates the communications campaign on this but is not comfortable mandating a face mask policy because of issue that might occur within the black and brown communities, and with citizen policing. Councilmember Kraft noted there is a significant public health benefit to widespread mask wearing, and it is obvious masks reduce virus transmission. He stated wearing masks protects others and is especially beneficial indoors . He stated he is aware of comments that this is an overreach to a person’s freedoms; however, they must take the long view here, and with fall and winter months approaching, the community needs to prepare itself . He stated the best way to do this is to get to 95% usage of face coverings, and that is the outcome he wants to see . He added the city will need to continue the strong education campaign and asked what the city can do to support businesses and residents and get masks to them. He stated he is in favor of a resolution to call on the governor for a statewide mandate, and a phased in approach to enforcement. Councilmember Mavity agreed and note d the impacts of the virus also have racial disparities in them. She stated she is strongly in favor of passing a resolution to demand mask wearing, adding these are resolutions and not ordinances and there may be some that are not City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 8 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 enforceable. She pointed out we have federal laws on seat belts, and this usage has increased over time and saved lives. She added this is the right thing to do to protect the health of residents and passing this will put more pressure on the governor to put more strategic press on this. She stated she is in favor of a resolution like Edina did, and added this is the right thing to do for the safety of all reside nts. Councilmember Harris stated she is in favor of wearing masks in doors and yet noted if the city adopts a resolution that is largely symbolic, but does not have staff to enforce it, that will be problematic. She added if the council does adopt mandating masks, then enforcement should come from the building division instead of the police, as it is a health and human services issue . She stated she is conscious of the impacts to the bipoc community and is reticent to add enforcement that would be pe rceived as separating from neighbors. She stated she might be in the minority on this, but this is where she stands, adding she is not in favor of a resolution and that folks should wear masks on their own. Councilmember Rog stated this is a complex issu e and she is concerned about harm that might be caused to bipoc residents. She stated she is worried the council will be misunderstood by members of the community if they do not mandate masks, and they will feel the council did not pass a resolution because they did not want to put residents of color in jeopardy. She stated the message the council sends by refusing to pass an ordinance will be more harmful, adding she does agree with Councilmember Kraft that wearing masks saves lives. She stated she will support implementation of a resolution . Councilmember Brausen agreed with the comments and will support a resolution. He stated he hopes the city will f ind a good balance and he trusts staff to work out the details. Mayor Spano stated he has discussed this with Commissioner Green; however, she reminded him the county does not have a direct impact on the health departments of cities. He requested staff look at the Minneapolis and Edina re solutions and see if it would be possible to align St. Louis Park with them. He added wearing a mask will not solve everything, but it is one piece along with washing hands and keeping distance. He stated science is changing over time and this is in the early stages and will be around for some time . He added the state has done good work on this, and he does not want to lose progress made. He added a plan to help suppress the spread now will help school districts in the fall, and he agrees with the need to help protect the bipoc population as well. Councilmember Mohamed asked the city attorney for the differences between a proclamation, resolution, and ordinance . Mr. Mattick stated some city mayors have done proclamations, and some resolution and ordinance . He added in order to enforce, it would take an ordinance, while a re solution creates awareness. Councilmember Mohamed stated she agrees with a resolution. Councilmember Harris added she supports wearing masks when indoors or in close proximity to others and is very aware of the value of wearing masks, especially as a courtesy to others. She supports a resolution as well. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3a) Page 9 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 13, 2020 Councilmember Rog and Mavity agreed with a resolution also. Councilmember Kraft supported an ordinance and a letter to the governor. Mayor Spano agreed with a letter to the governor as well, adding he would favor a resolution with an expanded education campaign. It was the consensus of the council to consider a resolution along with another mask drive in order to supply masks to those in need, along with creating a tool kit for businesses and others to use. Mr. Mattick stated the Mayor can do a proclamation which would be similar to an emergency declaration or a resolution, which cannot be enforced with a citation. Mx. Sojourner stated the council should use their white privilege to discu ss the use of masks with white neighbors and point out this is not about policing black and brown bodies. 5. Future study session agenda planning and prioritization – none Communications/meeting check-in (verbal) Councilmember Rog noted an upcoming online meeting on Tuesday evening related to changes at the Beltline Station. It will begin at 6:30 p.m. and there is more information on the city’s website. Councilmember Harris stated Paster Prope rties will provide a pop -up ice cream cart at Texa- Tonka on Sat. July 18 and all are welcome . The meeting adjourned at 11:11 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 6. 2020 Census update ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Minutes: 3b Unofficial minutes City council study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota July 27, 2020 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Anne Mavity, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: none Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Police Chief Harcey, Deputy Chief Kruelle, Racial Equity Manager (M x. Sojourner), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano ), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas) Guests: Shawn Sorrell, consultant 1. Police use of force policy review Police Chief Mike Harcey and Deputy Police Chief Bryan Kruelle presented to the council. They focused on police policy, and noted the recently implemented Minnesota Police Accountability Act, which all city police forces will need to comply with by December 15, 2020. Deputy Chief Kruelle stated the St. Louis Park police use of force policy is reviewed an updated periodically . He explained that chokeholds are not used unless deadly force is justified, while adding choke holds are not part of the training protocol within the St. Louis Park police force . He added de -escalation training is used with the police force and is specifically tracked , as well as all use of force incidents. Deputy Chief Kruelle added St. Louis Park officers have a duty to intervene and report inappropriate or illegal conduct by another officer. He stated since the George Floyd incident, the St. Louis Park police force has discussed the use of force policy used in the city, adding everyone in their ranks recognizes that this incident would not have ever happened within St. Louis Park . He stated the city’s officers are well trained, but the police department will also do a top to bottom and side to side review of use of force policies and procedures, adding the police force welcomes the council’s and communities thoughts on this topic as well. Chief Harcey added in St. Louis Park, the police take an oath to their duty, and from day one the police officers have a duty to intercede if they witness inappropriate or illegal conduct by another office r. Chief Harcey noted the city’s use of force statistics emphasize that police are doing a good job, adding the police force has received no use of force complaints in the last 3 years . He added the report is on the city’s website in the use of force section. He noted, however, the police recognize there is a need for constant improvement and a comprehensive policy review will be needed on City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 2 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 use of force policies, as required by the Police Officers Standards and Training Board by the end of this year. Chief Harcey stated the force is actively working on training enhancements, including de-escalation training, scenario -based training and incident de briefings . Mr. Sorrell, a consultant who has had experience with the St. Louis Park police force, facilitated discussion by the council. He asked the council a series of questions, to which they responded. Wh ere were you when they first heard about the George Floyd murder? Councilmember Mohamed stated she heard about it the day before, which was her birthday, adding it was during Ramadan. She stated she felt confused, a responsibility to check the facts on all sides , and not to jump to conclusions. As the day progressed, she stated she felt confusion, anger, adding it all still makes her very angry. Mayor Spano stated he had been out of town with family and got home late, so did not hear about the incident until the next morning. Councilmember Kraft stated he was at home in front of his computer, saw it shared on social media, and later saw the video. Councilmember Rog was home in the evening with family and was not aware of it until later. Councilmember Mavity stated she was at a staff check in at 8 a.m. and her colleague stated this is going to be a very big issue, adding she had been in the same area when Mr. Floyd was killed e arlier that day. Councilmember Harris stated she was at home due to COVID and because she and her partner decided not to watch the news as much, they did not find out about it until the evening after, adding she was in shock. Councilmember Brausen stated he was at home and saw it on his phone Monday evening. Mr. Harmening stated he had people to his home for Memorial Day and did not learn about it until the next morning. Chief Harcey was also busy on Memorial Day with family and did not see it until the next morning news and got to work right away. Ms. Solano stated she saw the video late that night, adding it was being shared on social media by her friends. Deputy Chief Kruelle stated he was alerted to the incident via his cell phone and on TV the next day. Mx. Sojourner was at home with their son and had information from him as he goes to a recording studio in that area, and then saw the video the next day. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 3 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 Ms. Deno was at home , saw the video the next day, and could not believe it. What did you hear as relates to police use of force? Councilmember Mohamed stated that the use of force was unnecessary. Councilmember Harris stated it was excessive. Councilmember Kraft stated the three other officers did nothing about it, he felt initial disgust. Mayor Spano stated the length of time the officer was using force was long and drawn out and a deliberate and decisive act, it was not a moment. Mr. Harmening stated he saw a lack of empathy on the officer’s face and remembers some one walked up to him, and the officer pulled out a chemical bottle and was going to spray it on the person. What did you see, read or hear in chief’s report on use of force in St. Louis Park? Councilmember Brausen stated he heard more about respect for human beings that had consented to be policed and management, adding every human being is owed and entitled respect. Councilmember Harris stated she heard commitment and intentionality around de-escalation , adding there is a learning environment and the values of the police department are enforced as it relates to the dignity of humans. Councilmember Rog states she saw a lot of police words and a police framework and felt there were a lot of assumptions about policing, the job of police, how it all works , and de-escalation and how works. She added she would like to explore this more. What words or statements stand out for you as well? Councilmember Mohamed stated the word “unjustified” stands out, adding she is frightened and concerned about officer biases. Councilmember Mavity stated she wants to be sure the council looks at what they heard and what they did not hear. She stated this is a good start in the framework of how the city polices, and she has confidence in the city’s police force, but added everyone is human and if mistakes are made, they can be bad. She stated she is missing a whole conversation about what is happening in policing and use of force statistics in 2019 show that 128 times out of 10,000 stops in St. Louis Park, use of force was used. She stated that is every 3 days, adding the police force is at risk every 3 days of going too far. She added the council needs to look at what is being measured and how it’s being measured. Councilmember Kraft stated he also has confidence in Chief Harcey and in the police’s culture but has concerns about the statistics and how many were using deadly force . He added he City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 4 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 appreciates the opportunity to strengthen language, but noted there is a need for crisp clarity, which he did not hear in response to some items. What surprised you about info provided to you? Councilmember Rog stated she was surprised the force could use choke holds. Councilmember Brausen stated the use of force number is low compared to what he anticipated given there are 46,000 calls . He stated he presumes the use of force numbers are related to felony charges. Mayor Spano stated he is concerned that police will only have 3 months to align their policies and practices with the state mandate . He feels this is too fast and will not allo w for thoughtful deliberate reflection. He stated this is not a one size fits all approach, and police policies will be different for St. Louis Park vs. Duluth or other cities, as each city has different operating philosophies within their policing. Councilmember Harris stated she was surprised about the message of safety and methods for achieving it, adding there is recognition in our community that there are some who don’t feel safe due to color or ethnic background. She asked how we can achieve a real sense of safety in our city . Councilmember Kraft stated he was surprised there was not data or statistics on use of force to compare. Councilmember Brausen stated he was surprised there were zero complaints for use of force , adding usually there would be at least one person, especially if it was unreasonable force. What did info not tell you? What else do you need to know? Councilmember Brausen stated he would like to know more about the race equity implications and data on people of color. Councilmember Rog stated she would like information on how often use of force was used as it relates to a mental health crisis . Mayor Spano stated he was interested in the information about the importance of de- escalation and see s how valuable a tool this is . He stated two-thirds of officers are trained in de-escalation and asked about the other one-third . Chief Harcey noted that all St. Louis Park police officers receive training on basic de -escalation , while two-thirds of officers get training on critical incident and crisis intervention training. Councilmember Harris stated she would like to know about interceding and asked if a new officer would feel supported if he made a report on use of force. Councilmember Mohamed stated she was surprised there were no use of force complaints in 2018-19 and asked if that is different from misconduct of a police officer. She asked what City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 5 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 current procedures are for police misconduct and if they will change under the MN Accountability Act. Chief Harcey stated they do receive complaints about officer conduct, and they do reports on those, noting he is required by his license to report to the post board on these, and the post board reviews the cases. He noted they have had zero complaints on use of force, adding they have data on this. Councilmember Mavity stated the basic challenge is tracking data and tracking it by race and at traffic stops. She wants to be sure this data is available to inform the council on their work. She stated the police force is still not collecting this data and , therefore , the city is lacking information to measure police work . She added this is important information to know for future policymaking. Councilmember Kraft agreed. He added he assumes Eight Can’t Wait is the benchmark the police should use, and if so, asked how it will be used. Mayor Spano stated he has been an advocate on collecting data on race relative to public safety, adding we are looking into the police department, but asked how often community members are calling police when they see a person of color in their neighborhood, just walking by. He noted there are biases in the public safety system and these need to be acknowledged. Councilmember Brausen stated he does not see the direct impact on 128 subjects that experienced use of force, and he wants information on how many resulted in arrests and felonies, noting this would allow the council to see what force was justified, and what was not. Councilmember Rog added she wants to know more about why force is used by the police and if mental health crisis is a factor. She stated there are better ways to deal with these issues vs. having the police show up. She added she is curious as to the ways the police chief and deputy feel the force can get better and asked if they have identified those areas. She is also curious about the duty to intervene and how that might work with other cities. Councilmember Harris asked how we can discern when a police call is made, and one nationality is using police services against another nationality or race . She also asked if the city’s police force notifies th e school the day after police have been called to a home with children residing there. Chief Harcey stated yes in certain situations the police do inform the school district. What do you see SLP police doing well according to the report? Councilmember Mohamed stated she likes how the police address intervening and follow the policies related to that. Councilmember Brausen stated he like s seeing the low incidents in use of force. Councilmember Kraft stated he appreciate s the focus on culture and training and sensed humility in the discussion by the chief and deputy chief, adding that is important. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 6 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 Councilmember Harris stated she is reflecting on the number of residents appreciative of police and fire, and she is celebrating the department’s commitment to ongoing improvement. She added she has a sense the police department is focused on inspiring staff to do their best every day. She stated she honors their work and their commitment to the community. What should be next steps? What additional policy measures should police take to reduce potential for harm? Councilmember Mavity stated she wants to see more strategic discussions from the council, police , and community about how to improve . She stated she did not hear this tonight and thinks the responsibility rests on the council to shape this conversation. She stated there is a need to be aligned with requirements of the post board but asked what the goal is that the council is looking for. She stated there is a need for more data and for it to be tracked in a way to make useful decisions. She added there is a need to be focused and give direction to police and stated the council should not only be talking to police but should also be engaging with experts in this conversation. She requested Mr. Harmening shape that conversation, that it be much broader, and include the community and experts in the community as well. Councilmember Mavity stated the use of force issue is only part of the picture, and the council needs to be asking more strategic questions to a larger group of people. She added the council should also be directing police to get in alignment with Eight Can’t Wait, and direction to the police that choke holds are not a tool to be used. She stated they need to focus and make real changes. Councilmember Kraft stated the city needs to be compliant on Eight Can’t Wait, while making sure to minimize the chance of immediate harm. He added there are times when police force may make a case on when to use force, but we need to see crispness on that and when it is appropriate. 2. Policing structural analysis Mr. Harmening stated this topic will address the hiring practices in the city’s police department and diversifying the police department. The areas of discussion will be: • Outcomes • Resources in police budget • Community to be part of the conversation Mr. Sorrell asked the council to keep this a very high-level discussion . He asked the councilmembers: where do you find or hear there is energy around the policing structure and where do you want to start? Councilmember Mohamed stated she would like to discuss biases and wants the discussion to be intentional. Mayor Spano agreed and asked if there is a role for deeper segmentation of the police force, or a place for unarmed public safety folks in the community. He asked if every person in the police City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 7 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 department needs to carry a gun daily, such as having the traffic enforcement group be unarmed. He stated this would change the nature of interactions. Councilmember Kraft stated he cannot answer this question as there is no data available to help answer it. He wants to do a deep examination of what is being done in the city’s policing and understand how many calls are mental health or domestic disputes, adding he wants the data to lead to have the biggest impact. Councilmember Rog stated she wants to start further back, to reimagine public safety as community safety, have the police be part of the response, but take a much broader view. She pointed to domestic assault and said is that a policing issue or could it be addressed through community safety initiatives. Councilmember Mavity also agreed on biases, and lack of data as issues of concern. She stated there needs to be tracking immediately , adding that policing has not changed in 150 years. She stated we need to think about our community, which has changed so much, think about what is needed now, and ask what other community experts are needed in the conversation. Councilmember Harris said when exploring the role of police in public safety , one question is: does our community feel safe when they call police and is there another avenue for people to reach out to for public safety. Councilmember Brausen understands the concerns, adding that some data on St. Louis Park is available on Crime mapping.com, where they lay out the previous 90 days crimes in the city. He noted that almost 60% are property crimes and over 20% are violent crimes, which are what should be focused on, are issues that require a use of force response. He asked what the problem is that we are seeking to respond to. He added he would like to talk to the 128 people that had use of force against them as well. He stated he agrees with what the police force is doing and wants to have a conversation with the community. He added just because events in Minneapolis were horrific, we don’t need to change the St. Louis Park police force. Mr. Harmening stated we need to do outreach to the community and understand their expectations of the police department. Chief Harcey agreed. He stated having the conversation with the community and learning their expectations is how the police build trust and serve the community. Ms. Solano agreed with Mr. Harmening, adding the expectations of the community are foremost and utilizing the city’s boards and commissions and engaging those currently not engaged will be very important. Deputy Chief Kruelle added this will be driven by the community and the changes they want to see, along with legislative changes and changes coming from the council. He stated hiring in the future will be a challenge in the world of COVID and post-George Floyd, adding officers are worn down and are questioning if they want to continue in policing. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 8 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 Mx . Sojourner stated racial equity will need to be addressed and racialized healing around policing, around bipoc and white bodies. Ms. Deno stated as someone who works for the city and lives here, she wants to see the city continue to build on good things. She agrees with inclusion of the community and the utilization of boards and commissions on setting expectations. Who else from other groups need to be part of these conversations? Councilmember Rog stated students in our community, as well as business owners, human service providers, bipoc especially black residents, and folks in mental health and healthcare . Councilmember Harris stated the commissions as well as neighborhood associations, Twin West Chamber and emergency services from Methodist Hospital. Councilmember Mohamed stated anyone who makes up St. Louis Park . She added, however, she is hesitant about including human services here as they have their own racial and class biases as well, and we need to be aware of this . She stated we cannot replace one system with another problematic system. What decisions can we make tonight for next steps? Mayor Spano stated he will not commit to answer tonight as this is just the beginning of the conversation. He stated we need to elevate voices in the community who have different experiences with law enforcement, and he believes the police are now ready to have that conversation. What might be our next step or our first step to move forward? Councilmember Brausen stated to be intentional about designing a community process and community engagement around the discussion. Councilmember Mohamed stated she wants to hear from a broader range of St. Louis Park and be intentional about who we are reaching out to. Councilmember Kraft added he would like to know how our police spend time, what the outcomes are, and start breaking down how things are happening. Councilmember Mavity agree d there is a need to listen to the community; however, that is not mutually inclusive to doing basic police reforms right now, such as banning choke holds. She stated community input and listening must be ongoing with constant feedback, and the city should be building and e mbedding this in police work on an ongoing basis. She stated the council has a responsibility to act right now and get input from the community. Councilmember Rog stated the council needs to come to agreement on what we are trying to solve . She stated there is a need for a cost benefit analysis , and she has concerns about how City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 9 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 much money goes to the general fund and is tied up in policing, adding we need to do better around issues of community safety and get to outcomes we want. Councilmember Mavity added our goal is to make sure our policing model reflects our community. She stated the model is now outdated so we need to update it to the needs of our community. Mr. Sorrell stated he will submit his notes to staff to formulate next steps. 3. Future study session agenda planning and prioritization Mr. Harmening stated next week’s agenda will include the first reading of an ordinance revoking the Crime Free Ordinance, per council direction in June 2020. Another agenda item includes changing rules to allow liquor at Westwood Hills Nature Center for events. Councilmember Rog asked if the conversations about home -based business and ADU’s might be discussed at the same time . Mr. Harmening stated staff does not see an overlap on these two items and he can provide further explanation offline. Councilmem ber Brausen referenced the climate action report in w ritten reports and asked if staff is looking at this as part of the budget to be discussed regarding funding a climate response . Mr. Harmening stated yes. Councilmember Brausen added he suggested using the public meeting here related to supporting the inner-city home energy program and extending this as a contest to challenge and engage other cities around St. Louis Park to support this. Councilmember Brausen noted regarding the Arlington Row project, h e has no problem extending that one last time, adding he sent questions to staff on whether the project is being revised. Councilmember Kraft stated he would need more background on the Arlington Row project. He also appreciated work done to link numbers and goals to plans related to the climate report, adding one thing missing is that staff always starts with the costs. He believes they should start with the benefits and energy savings ideas, and then present ideas on how to finance and potential savings. Councilmember Kraft added regarding Conservation in the Park, we should be thinking how to cover 1,000 people, and reducing energy by 35%. He noted this needs to be thought about in a much broader way. Mayor Spano asked for more detail on the Wooddale projects for future reports. He also asked for more background on where the city is at with the proposal. Councilmember Mavity stated the report refers to the February 10, 2020 study session and outcomes from that conversations. She added she has received emails about public process for this project and stated there has been extensive public process on this project with the past developer. As this moves forward, there will be additional public process. She wanted to acknowledge there has been 6 years of public process regarding this site. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3b) Page 10 Title: Study session meeting minutes of July 27, 2020 Councilmember Rog referenced the public art map on the website and asked if some of the murals in the city are missing on the map, or if staff is only showing publicly funded art on the map. She added this seems to be limiting. Ms. Solano noted this was staff’s first attempt on putting the map together and publicly funded art was the focus, but they can also add others and will look at that. Councilmember Rog asked about the Walker Lake community mural and if there will be descriptive stories there also. Ms. Solano stated she will check with Friends of the Arts and report back to council. Mayor Spano asked about sidewalk poetry and if that will also be included. Ms. Solano stated yes, this will be on the map as well, and more information will be presented to council related to the poems selected. The meeting adjourned at 9:04 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 4. Climate action in time of COVID-follow-up discussion 5. June 2020 monthly financial report 6. Second quarter investment report (April-June 2020) 7. SWLRT Wooddale Station Site RFP and developer selection process 8. Public art update 9. Arlington Row Apartments East and Arlington Row Apartments west plat extensions 10. COVID-related street closures ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Minutes: 3c Unofficial minutes City council meeting St. Louis Park, Minnesota August 3, 2020 1.Call to order Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. 1a. Pledge of allegiance 1b. Roll call Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Anne Mavity, Nadia Mohamed, and Margaret Rog Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Police Chief Harcey, Operations & Recreation Director (Ms. Walsh), Operations & Recreations Coordinator (Ms. Shingles), Community Development Director (Ms. Barton), City Attorney (Mr. Knutson), Housing Supervisor/Deputy Community Development Director (Ms. Schnitker), Assistant Housing Supervisor (Ms. Olson), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas) Guests: None 2.Presentations - none 3.Approval of minutes 3a. City council meeting minutes of June 15, 2020 Councilmember Kraft noted the following corrections: -Page 9 should read…“as he had heard concern that they don’t work well.” -Page 9, 3rd paragraph should read…“about the concentration of our affordable housing.” -Page 9, 2nd bullet down should read…“medium density in the shape of the boundaries….development indicate density of 50-125 units per acre are appropriate and as this parcel is on the edge…he stated the net on density for him is there should be a compelling reason for anything on 30 units per acre, and should be approved, but what is proposed is expected within the comp plan.” -Page 10 should read, “90 spaces yield 1.5 to one spaces per unit…mixed development…overly large concentration of affordable housing and elsewhere in the city, Elmwood’s concentration is about 50%, but St. Louis Park’s percentage of affordable re ntal housing is also about 50%.” -Page 10, 6th bullet should read… “to net all of these issues the question is, is there compelling reason fo r density…over 30 units per acre.” Page 2 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3c) Title: City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 -Page 10, last bullet should read… “inequality within our society…one of the most basic inequality issues is affordable housing…and other than health and family it doesn’t get more challenging than having an affordable place to live .” It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to approve the June 15, 2020 city council meeting minutes as amended. The motion passed 7-0. 3b. City council meeting minutes of July 6, 2020 It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to approve the July 6, 2020 city council meeting minutes as presented. The motion passed 7-0. 4.Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar 4a. Accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of June 24 thru July 27, 2020. 4b. Approve an extension until August 15, 2021 for Melrose Company to record the final plat for Arlington Row Apartment East and Arlington Row Apartment West. 4c. Authorize execution of an amendment to the professional services contract with SEH Inc. in the amount of $16,610. It was moved by Councilmember Harris, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve the agenda as presented and items listed on the consent calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. The motion passed 7-0. 5.Boards and commissions - none 6.Public hearings - none 7.Re quests, petitions, and communications from the public – none 8.Re solutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items 8a. First reading amending ordinance to allow alcohol at Westwood Hills Nature Center Ms. Shingles presented the staff report. Councilmember Harris asked if staff approves events at Westwood Hills Nature Center on a case by case basis, and with approved caterers only. Ms. Shingles stated yes, noting this ordinance will allow alcohol for wedding events, as well as other events . She added events also take place at Wolfe Park and Oak Hill Park on an infrequent basis. Page 3 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3c) Title: City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 Councilmember Harris noted this is an administrative efficiency to include other parks in the ordinance along with the WHNC. She stated the ROC and the Rec Center both allow alcohol at events and both are in an urban setting, whereas the Nature Center is in a different environment. She asked if there are any concerns for animals and wildlife living in the area and what impacts might be felt. Ms. Shingles noted for every event there are provisions in place and alcohol is only allowe d in certain spaces at the nature center, while those attending may remain in one room only and not throughout the whole facility. She added that renters may need to rent temporary fencing around the area if they have an outside event and have receptacles for recycling for larger events. Councilmember Rog asked if non-licensed caterers were allowed to hold events at the nature center and if exceptions were made to provide alternatives for security and if anyone were to bring in their own food or food that’s not from a caterer, but from a store. Ms. Walsh stated those booking an event at the nature center may use any vendor for food, but in order to have liquor at the center, a licensed caterer must be used. Councilmember Harris asked if renters could not afford a licensed caterer, or not afford to purchase their own insurance for an event, was there a more cost-effective way to assist them. Mr. Harmening stated if they are consuming alcohol in a public facility, the city takes on the liability for that space and puts staff in a difficult position, so it is best to provide a licensed caterer for these events. Councilmember Brausen stated he supports the ordinance and encourages licensed caterers to provide a low-cost license in order to assist residents - who may not be able to afford a licensed caterer - to have events at the nature center. It was moved by Councilmember Harris, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve first reading of ordinance amending Chapter 20-5 of the St. Louis Park Code of Ordinances relating to prohibited acts to allow alcohol at Westwood Hills Nature Center and to set the second reading for August 17, 2020. The motion passed 7-0. 8b. F irst reading – repeal of crime and drug free rental ordinance Ms. Schnitker presented the staff report. Councilmember Mavity stated this repeal of the crime and drug free rental ordinance is a long time coming and the city is ever closer to where it should be in terms of separating policing and housing. She stated this was the core of the challenge and criminalizing behavior in a non -transparent way, harmed individuals. She stated she is grateful to the workgroup and staff for all their work on this. Page 4 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3c) Title: City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 Councilmember Mavity stated the language proposed feels close, but it’s not 100% there yet. She stated one of the core concepts of separating the police from housing and where there are actual violations of the law, police have the tools to address this. However, she noted, she still has concerns about 8-331 B and C. She stated previously the crime free ordinance was implemented by police and housing and the fact the police are still mentioned here is troublesome . She stated she understand the police can be consulted but is not sure they should be mentioned here. Mr. Harmening explained rental licensing is run by building and energy and taken care of by the inspections department, who is the lead on rental licensing code and ordinances. He noted there is a provisional license item in the code and police are mentioned as the consideration of making a property subject to a provisional license, related to the type of conduct happening at a facility. He stated Inspections would have no other way to find out what is going on at a property unless the police were there to report to staff. He added the police are the source of information for staff. Councilmember Mavity asked if police also respond to a crime in the example of a non- housing licensing issue and if that language is included in a non-housing licensing as well. Mr. Harmening stated the police are required to do annual compliance checks and report back to the city clerk who provides liquor licensing and cites for violations. Chief Harcey added the police’s job is to provide partnership with the inspections division and the property owners. He stated police are trying to solve a problem, are consulted, and the data is public. He stated it is a consulting role for police. Councilmember Mavity noted this collaboration across departments should continue to happen; however, her concern here is the language and that the plan was to extricate the policing model from housing, and yet it’s still in here. She stated she asserts it is not necessary and sends the wrong message in housing. She suggested it be removed from section 8-331 B and C today. Ms. Olson noted the work group members did discuss the provisional license issue and decided to remove the number of calls per service but did leave in the police because of ongoing public safety concerns. She added they still wanted a mechanism for dealin g with a property - within the ordinance - if it becomes unsafe – from a building maintenance standpoint or with criminal activity . Councilmember Mavity , however, stated if a retail establishment became a hub of criminal activity or unsafe, the city has the tools within the policing model to address that. She added with due respect to the work group, our world has recently been turned upside down and with a greater focus on how to modernize policing in terms of continuous improvement. She reiterated there is no place for the police to be involved in the licensing process, only if a problem occurs. Councilmember Harris added she has heard from several property owners on this, and they feel there has been benefit to the ordinance and in the absence of it, they are greatly interested in remaining connected to the information source. She noted what Page 5 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3c) Title: City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 Chief Harcey said related to the many years of trust that was built between the police department and property owners. She suggested there may be an opportunity to create a program similar to block captains, where leaders can sign up and receive weekly crime data. She added she does not see information sharing with property owners as policing, and this sharing information could be an opt-in for property owners and could be fit into the ordinance. Ms. Schnitker stated this information sharing has always been available and never part of the ordinance. She added it was a process to inform owners of police activity at their property . Ch ief Harcey state d property owners have a right to know information about their facilities . He asked the council if the police have support from council on pro-actively providing this information to owners and landlords. He stated he is not sure how they will find out this information if the data is not provided to them when there are calls at their properties . Councilmember Brausen stated he will support the ordinance as proposed and with all due respect to Councilmember Mavity, he is concerned about demonizing the police if they are extricated totally from this process, which was set up in 2008 to deal with problem landlords and owners. He stated the provisional license gives the city a mechanism to deal with problems if they exist, adding how will the city know about is sues if they are not able to get the data. He added there is no similar tool for retail establishments and if there is ongoing criminal activity in a housing facility, there needs to be a way for the city to deal with it. He added this also addresses a basic need of housing, which is a basic right and gives help to the residents who live there. Councilmember Mohamed agreed with Councilmember Brausen, and noted she also understands Councilmember Mavity’s concerns. She stated they are all valid points ; however, she has concerns about what happens when the police are taken completely out of the equation, and when people of color need support for problematic places. She added the old ordinance is the problem, especially as it relates to the number of calls to police . Councilmember Mohamed stated it is necessary to protect residents and renters and allow them to be safe and happy in their communities. Councilmember Rog stated she agree s with Councilmember’s Mohamed and Brausen and appreciates Councilmember Mavity’s comments as well. She stated she is comfortable moving slower on this and is concerned tenants have not been asked about completely extricating police in terms of safety of where they live . She stated the police can be helpful and the police still matter in St. Louis Park. Councilmember Rog stated she has been an advocate for reimaging public safety adding the council has not yet consulted with those most involved and those dependent on the police. Therefore, she stated, she will support the current iteration presented by staff, adding she would like to know more about training for property owners going forward, to reframe . Page 6 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3c) Title: City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 Councilmember Kraft stated he appreciated these issues being raised by Councilmember Mavity and asked if in removing the sections Councilmember Mavity noted, the police contact would not be an issue. Councilmember Mavity stated her comments only really refer to section 8-331 B, and not C. She added she is trying to ensure the police are focused on policing and on criminal activity ; however, she is concerned about innuendos, threats, and racial biases. She asked again why police need to be involved in the city’s housing, unless there is criminal activity. Councilmember Kraft asked if this were not in the ordinance, what would be used to determine if a provisional license was issued and if it might be building maintenance issues or upkeep. Ms. Schnitker stated yes, that’s all that would be left. Mr. Knutson pointed out in section 8-331, and the existence of ongoing public safety concerns issue, if section B were removed involving “police contacts” and inserting “incidents” instead, this might help address the concerns Councilmember Mavity points to. Councilmember Mavity stated to be clear, her main concern is for teenage boys being boisterous and loud. She stated if the boys are African American and people are threatened by that and call the police often, the landlord may tell the family to leave the premises so as not to get a provisional license . She stated the issue is that she wants all residents to feel safe and secure in their own housing. Councilmember Kraft asked if requiring background checks by the police for liquor licenses feels diff erent to Councilmember Mavity, as far as police activity. Mr. Harmening stated background checks for liquor licenses are effective and while it is rare to find something that results in the license not being renewed, it has happened. Councilmember Mohamed asked about boisterous teen boys and if police are called, what would be done, under the crime free ordinance. Chief Harcey stated if called for loud music or disorderly conduct, officers respond and determine if a violation of any city ordinance or any criminal act happened, then apply discretion to what occurred, and give a citation . He added with the ordinance proposed tonight, this limits police providing information to landlords, but if we see a continued issue over and over again, then it is the city’s responsibility to provide quality of life to the community and police then have a conversation with the landlord to solve the problem. Mr. Harmening noted in his 17 years as city manager, there has only been one provisional license given and t hat involved serious criminal activity, including gun fire, and drugs. He stated the license has been used very rarely but can be useful. Mayor Spano stated he is not interested in supporting Councilmember Mavity’s suggested changes, adding we use police interactions in all sorts of areas of the community to drive how we respond as a community. He added he has had lots of people of color come to him about this ordinance who did not want it repealed. He Page 7 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3c) Title: City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 stated in this new ordinance, the police will not drive this process, but will respond to criminal activity and information that is publicly available. Mayor Spano stated the ordinance has been radically altered from the police to a housing-related ordinance and he is comfortable with this, adding it is not logical to put up a wall between the police and property owners. Councilmember Harris stated there might be consideration for larger buildings, where there are greater incidents for police calls for service, to require having a property manager live on site, to help dissipate issues rather than calling police. Councilmember Harris proposed a friendly amendment to change police to public safety. Councilmember Brausen stated he will not support the friendly amendment. Councilmember Kraft stated he will support the motion on the floor now and would also support an amendment to remove section 8-331 B because with it removed, there is still the capability to contact police . He added removing section B would improve the ordinance somewhat. Councilmember Rog stated she supports the motion as presented and feels this has become about principle vs. practice . She is curious about what problem the council is trying to solve . It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Kraft, to amend the ordinance to remove the language from section 8-331 B. The motion failed 2-5 (Mayor Spano and Councilmembers Mohamed, Rog, Harris, Brausen opposed). May or Spano thanked the work group and staff for their work on this ordinance . Councilmember Mavity stated she will want to talk more with staff on implementation of the ordinance and having a larger conversation about police to address how the city uses the police effectively. She added she will support this as she wants this to appeal broadly, even though she does not agree with it. Councilmember Harris stated she wants to be sure the police have clarity on direction here . Chief Harcey stated yes, the police have clear direction and can continue to work with property owners. He added he will send a letter to property owners related to the ordinance and will confer with Mr. Harmening on this. It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to: 1.Approve first reading of a revised ordinance that repeals sections 8-331 and 8-332 of city code requiring a crime-free, drug-free lease addendum, notices of violations and termination of tenancy for violation of the ordinance in their entirety, and to 2.Revise Provisional License Ordinance 8-333 to: Page 8 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3c) Title: City council meeting minutes of August 3, 2020 -Allow the city to change a rental license to provisional status upon determination of ongoing public safety concerns, without regard to the number of reported incidents; and to -Allow landlords and involved tenants to appeal this decision before the provisional license takes effect. The motion passed 7-0. 9.Communications Councilmember Brausen stated he appreciated the report from the ESC in light of COVID- 19 and encourage d the city to engage with the Home Energy competition. He stated he was shocked to see that only St. Louis Park and Hopkins are doing this, and was surprised Edina, Minnetonka, and Golden Valley were not involved in the competition . He stated St. Louis Park is leading the competition currently and he challenged neighboring cities to address climate change and tighten up energy saving for homes in the western suburbs. Co uncilme mber Harris stated the Just Deeds initiative is an opportunity for residents that have racial covenants, to have them removed from their deeds, pro bono. She stated there is more information coming adding this is long overdue, thanking Mx. Sojourner, City Attorney Mattick, and Mr. Harmening for their work on this. Councilmember Mohamed thanked the city for donating over 500 masks to local mosques over the weekend. She referenced an article she read about policing models having a multicultural advisory board, and how that could be a new model community- oriented group. Councilmember Kraft stated he saw the article also and it was great. He added to what Councilmember Brausen said about the energy competition, stating this is a perfect opportunity for homeowners and renters to do something related to climate change. He noted they give recommendations on appliance changes over time and how to reduce all environmental footprints to help achieve goals over time. Mayor Spano stated the city dispersed 50,000 masks and thanked staff and the public for getting behind this city effort. Mr. Harmening added that number is now over 70,000 as the state gave those to be distributed, and the city then ordered more for distribution. 10.Adjournment The meeting adjourned at 8:20 p.m. ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Minutes: 3d Unofficial minutes City council study session St. Louis Park, Minnesota August 10, 2020 The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m. Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Rachel Harris, Larry Kraft, Anne Mavity, and Margaret Rog (arrived at 7 p .m.) Councilmembers absent: Nadia Mohamed Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Building and Energy Director (Mr. Hoffman), Director of Operations and Recreation (Ms. Walsh), CIO (Mr. Pires), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), CFO (Ms. Lammers), Police Chief Harcey, Fire Chief Koering, Deputy Police Chief K ruelle, Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Director of Community Development (Ms. Barton), Finance Manager (Ms. Sledge), City Assessor (Mr. Bultema), Senior Management A nalyst (Ms. Solano ), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas) Guests: Liz Diaz, Ehlers 1. 2020 COVID funding Mr. Harmening introduced Melanie Lammers, new CFO and Sharae Sledge, new finance manager. Ms. Lammers presented an overview of the federal guidelines and state of MN guidelines related to the Cares Act Funding, which will help address COVID-19 issues in the 2021 budget. Ms. Lammers noted eligible expenses as communications, medical supplies, payroll for services dedicated to COVID response, telework expenses and equipment and small business grants. She explained MN received $841 million for local government and St. Louis Park received $3.6 million in Cares Act funding. Ms. Lammers stated the city’s next steps include ongoing monitoring as well as monthly reporting to the state and preparation for a required audit. She added staff will work on 2020- 21 budget concerns and provide update s to the council as necessary. Councilmember Harris asked if within the public safety and staffing hours information, fire department hours are included. She noted specifically she was asking about the fire department outreach program going into senior housing during COVID. Ms. Lammers stated those hours are included. Councilmember Harris noted the city’s and state’s mask mandate, asked how enforcement is going and if police are noticing any costs related to that enforcement and if more resources are needed for that enforcement. Chief Harcey stated there have been very fe w complaints on mask violations, and if any are received, they are referred to inspections and community development for follow up, adding there have been no additional needs on enforcement to date. Councilmember Harris asked if the weeks of community outreach and education on masks have yielded positive results , whether there has been an uptick in calls for help or emergency calls Page 2 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3d) Title: Study session minutes of August 10, 2020 related to mental health, and if this can be tied into living in a COVID pandemic world. Chief Harcey stated the force has looked at that from prior to March 1 through last week. He stated police had a meeting with the Hennepin County social worker and a slight uptick in calls was noticed, adding the social worker stated in general, the calls are related to COVID 19 and isolation issues . Councilmember Kraft asked for clarification on how the Cares Act funds can be used. He noted one part says it cannot be used for costs accounted for in the budget and asked how this relates to personnel expenses. Ms. Lammers stated if a person’s job duties became pandemic-related, and was not intended, but shifted to that, that position might be reimbursable, but staff must adhere to the guidelines. Councilmember Mavity asked if the definitions provided by staff are specific to St. Louis Park or from federal guidance on expenditures. She stated she assumes the city’s additional support for rental assistance is included here or under public health expense . She added as all kinds of housing instability begins to occur, she wants to be sure the city budgets for that. She asked if that will be through rental assistance or the public health budget and if the city needs more rental assistance, will it have the flexibility to provide that. Mr. Harmening explained that in the staff report, the $108,000 allocated to STEP for emergency rental assistance is noted . He stated this is above the normal $60,000 provided annually and includes the small business emergency assistance grants of $225,000. He added the city is planning to provide another $200,000 in small business assistance along with the county program, and that is accounted for. Mr. Harmening stated if the council wants to allocate additional funds, that would need to be discussed. Ms. Deno added the definition of economic support is spelled out in the reporting requirements and the city must follow the MMB guidance here as it is highly regulated. Councilmember Mavity stated she is not sure how quickly housing assistance gets to residents, adding she would need a report on that to put this into context. She added the city cannot meet all the needs, but a report would let the council know where demand is high. She added she is nervous about providing an additional $200,000 on business loans if the council is not aware of the needs of housing areas. Ms. Barton noted staff is in contact with STEP and thus far, STEP has only requested $30,000 of the $108,000 the city is providing to them . She stated STEP has not indicated they need additional funding at this time, however that may change in 2021. Councilmember Mavity thanked staff for this information, adding she is not requesting any additional follow up . Councilmember Brausen thanked staff for the report, noting he appreciates their judicious spending. He agreed with the staff recommendations on funds allocated to address COVID in 2021, appreciate d the ways they are looking to spend, and staff’s creativity on this. Councilmember Harris stated council received updates from Mr. Harmening on what might happen in St. Louis Park if any encampments were established. She stated she would like staff to investigate how many students and families in the city are not connected to STEP, and that might be in need currently. Councilmember Mavity added the liaison at the schools has data on homeless youth and that might be a good place to start for information. Page 3 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3d) Title: Study session minutes of August 10, 2020 Councilmember Harris asked if the city’s small business assistance program assists the Gig economy within St. Louis Park. Ms. Barton stated in the first round of grant funding, funds were only eligible for business that had 3-25 employees and did not include Gig workers. She noted Hennepin County did not provide funding for Gig workers either and they were encouraged to apply for unemployment. Councilmember Harris asked if future city funding could include Gig workers. Ms. Barton stated the city was following Hennepin County criteria, so funding will not apply to Gig or self- employed workers, but she added this could be up for future discussion. Councilmember Harris asked how many Gig or self-employed workers there are in St. Louis Park. Ms. Barton stated she does not have data on that but can look into it. Councilmember Harris stated it behooves the city to support e ntrepreneurship, and she would like to support independent workers who are starting businesses as they help communities become strong. Councilmember Rog suggested supporting school districts with the purchase of hot spots and support technology for the city’s students. She noted if this fit into the CARES Act funding, she would support it. Mayor Spano agreed and stated any way the city can support the school district is an obvious opportunity. Ms. Deno stated staff will continue to look into this with the schools, but added guidelines are very specific as to how funding can be used for technology in schools. Mayor Spano asked if St. Louis Park’s spending ratio for the CARES Act funds are similar to what other cities are spending. Ms. Diaz stated she has been working with various cities on this, and some are using all of it for their payroll, and in a variety of different ways. She noted some are using the funding for public safety. Ms. Lammers explained the guidelines are so broad and allocations have been all over the board in other cities, noting that every entity has different needs. Mayor Spano understood this and added he would like staff and council to be aware of any needs that we might be missing. He asked about masks and the status of spending on them for distribution to residents. Mr. Harmening stated the city received 100,000 disposable masks from the state for businesses and non-profit uses. He stated the city has dispensed 70,000 of the masks, adding that 5,000 masks have been ordered. Chief Koering added the 5,000 masks ordered are to be washed and reused and were supposed to be at the city last week, but the order has been delayed. He stated those 5,000 masks are already spoken for within the race equity and inclusion area, which is an historically underserved population and has needs for masks. He added an additional 1,000 masks have been allocated to operations as well. Ms. Deno stated staff will continue to update the council monthly on finances and plans as they move forward. Page 4 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3d) Title: Study session minutes of August 10, 2020 2.2021 Budget Mr. Harmening stated this will be a high-level overview of the 2021 budget and more discussions will happen between now and December when the final levy is adopted. He added based on early conversations with the council, staff heard they wanted to consider a levy in crease of 3% or less for 2021, while the HRA levy is up because home values are up. Ms. Lammers stated once the levy is decided on by council, it can go down, but not up. She reviewed the levy increases since 2014 and noted the HRA levy is proposed at the maximum of value , which is $182,000 or 0.185%. She stated staff will be back at the Sept. 14, 2020 meeting with more information on this as well as franchise fees. Councilmember Kraft referred to the tax capacity and analysis slide and asked what the fiscal disparities pool is . Mr. Harmening explained that state law affects the metro area only, where commercial and industrial property value in taxes are shared across the metro area. The funds go into a pool and a formula is used for distributing the tax base . Cities with very little industrial properties, benefit from sharing in this pool. Mr. Harmening stated St. Louis Park is a net distributor to the pool and there are other cities that benefit from this across the 7-county metro area. He added this fact shows St. Louis Park has more diversity of business, industrial, commercial, and residential. Mr. Bultema noted the city is in the top 15 for net contributors . Ms. Diaz added in 2020, $10.9 million of tax was distributed and $5.7 went back to the city, allowing for a $5 million net contribution. Councilmember Kraft asked regarding the tax capacity increase, what portion comes from the value increases from what’s currently there, or from something new, or from something being allocated to TIF. Mr. Bultema stated market appreciation accounts for the vast majority of this, while new construction goes up and down. He noted last year’s new improvement value was 0.8%, and the base is $8 million , so it takes a lot of improvements to add up. Councilmember Kraft added the analysis is always based on a typical home, but valuations on apartment homes are going up more. He stated he would be interested in seeing a rental analysis and on the utilities portion also. Mr. Harmening stated franchise fees have increased every other year and in 2021, they would increase again. He noted these fees are tied to capital improvement needs and all fees go to pavement management programs vs. using a levy or special assessments to residents. Ms. Lammers added several pieces of debt are coming in 2021 related to constructions projects such as Westwood Nature Center and Connect the Park. Councilmember Kraft stated he is interested in the Dakota Bridge also, and with the priorities the city has, how much will this cost in future years, noting it seems debt service will be going up more next year. He added given the recession and cost of living adjustments, he feels 2% is on the high end for increases. Councilmember Harris noted infrastructure improvements and how with 100-year rainfalls happening more often, does the proposed budget include enough resources for continuations Page 5 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3d) Title: Study session minutes of August 10, 2020 of updating the stormwater infrastructure. Mr. Harmening stated the city has a capital plan for the storm water infrastructure that is prepared each year and is tied to the utility rates and then built into the CIP each year. Councilmember Harris stated she would find value in a map of low spots in the city and compare this to localized flooding. She asked if the city is approaching localized flooding issues and creating long-term solutions. Mr. Harmening stated staff will come back to council on the CIP, discuss further the stormwater plan, where there are deficiencies, and the entire capital plan. Councilmember Harris added she appreciate s a cap of 3% levy, adding it seems more fitting to have a cost of living increase of 1% given the financial situation . She added she does value staff and supports their raises; however, this is not the case right now. Councilmember Brausen pointed out the effective tax rate of 3.0% vs. 6.2% and asked, at a 3% levy increase, if this will result in the city tax rate actually decreasing next year. Ms. Lammers stated that is correct. Councilmember Brausen asked if the council decided on a 6.2% increase, would the city tax rate effectively stay the same. Ms. Lammers stated that is correct. Councilmember Brausen asked about the proposed environmental and sustainability budget and the recommended $1.27 million to pay for goal #4. He also asked about the $1.5 million allocated now . Mr. Hoffman stated this is correct adding the budget shows the magnit ude of the city’s environmental goals and working to reach them. He added to create an incentive takes large programming from the city, but this has not been plugged into the budget yet and the city has to agree to take it on. He stated staff is now looking at 2021 to reaching out on this incentive program. Councilmember Brausen stated the sustainability project is $23 million over 10 years and if this comes out of the 2021 budget, it will have to be put back in at that amount over 9 years instead . He stated he prefers to keep it in the budget, adding this will impact increasing the levy . He noted there is never a great time to start but given the ove rall impact, he is more comfortable with a 5% range levy increase in order to fund a more robust climate action plan, adding the more time that is wasted, the worse it will get. Councilmember Brausen stated 5% is prudent and is in line with our historical numbers. He added citizens will require more help and there will be fewer social safety nets from the state, but the vast majority of St. Louis Park residents are still employed and the vast majority of taxpayers can handle this in order to keep the services they are accustomed to. He stated he would rather error on the higher end, adding maybe there should be no staff increases this year to compensate. Councilmember Mavity stated with the 3% levy, on average , that is a $3 per year impact on residents. Ms. Lammers stated that is correct, adding it is a $3 decrease for the year. Councilmember Mavity added at 6%, this would be a $38 per year increase. Ms. Lammers confirmed this as well. Councilmember Mavity stated while this number varies on the value of a home , this is an average barometer of the impact and in general, $38 per year is not a dramatic cost when spread over 12 months . However, she stated the city does need to be cognizant we are Page 6 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3d) Title: Study session minutes of August 10, 2020 experiencing a recession or depression of historic proportions, and without knowing what is ahead, this gives reason to be more cautious. She stated she prefers to stay more toward 3% unless staff has good reason to move this higher. She added in the end, the community could tolerate a higher levy, but added it may affect many older citizens who are on a fixed income . Councilmember Mavity asked about requests for additional staffing and if the schools still have police officers . Chief Harcey stated yes, they do, if schools are open. Councilmember Mavity stated she feels data tracking is the most important piece of funding the police, noting council has asked for data to be tracked by race, and the data can be used if needed to support in areas that need adjustment. She stated if this data gathering work requires an additional person, she will support that. Councilmember Rog stated she is supportive of the 3% levy and not hiring additional staff. She is also supportive of the HRA levy and while she does support additional staff for racial equity work, she would like to know more about outcomes of this work. She is also interested in consideration of council salaries and would like those increases to be in line with staff increases. Ms. Deno pointed out, as a practice, council salaries are always in line with staff increases. Councilmember Kraft asked with all the outreach conducted during COVID, are additional resources needed for outreach in three additional positions. Councilmember Kraft also noted climate crisis and agreed with Councilmember Brausen. He stated he is interested in how the city starts building these costs into the budget and added benefits must be included in the report, as well as alternative resources. He stated he would like to see these amounts and estimates built in, adding there may be a unique way to do this or to structure investments to outweigh benefits over time. He added he is concerned about increasing the levy from 3%, especially while in the middle of a racial, COVID, and climate crisis all at the same time. Councilmember Brausen added the public safety city organizational charts only show public safety and police, and do not show the four officers that are school liaisons and/or DARE officers. He is interested in how the officers are allocated to the school, what type of issues they deal with, as well as outcomes . He appreciates the fact the city supports the schools in this way, but with climate, racial equity , and COVID, we may need to look at school districts sharing some of that cost with the city. He stated he would like to discuss this before the Sept. meeting. Councilmember Rog agreed and would like to hear from the school superintendent on SRO and DARE programs as well. Mayor Spano asked about the transition from paid on call to full-time fire fighters and about how the costs will balance out. Fire Chief Koering stated he will do a presentation on this for the Aug. 24, 2020 meeting and provide details and the benefits of moving staff and resources around. Mayor Spano asked about the police training budget increase and what is the current police training budget. Chief Harcey stated it is currently $70,000 and a $10,000 increase will help the police force meet the mandates of the reform bill. Mayor Spano stated he would like more info rmation on the trainings in order to get a better sense of them. Mr. Harmening stated staff will be prepared to provide a report on this at the Aug. 24, 2020 council meeting. Page 7 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3d) Title: Study session minutes of August 10, 2020 Mayor Spano stated he is comfortable with the 3% levy for now, but there will be more questions from council and more clarification needed before council gets to the final number. Councilmember Kraft asked about the CARES Act funds and impacts from 2020 on 2021. He also asked if the city can increase general reserves, could that impact 2021. Mr. Harmening stated the best example of impacts on 2021 budget relate to savings in staffing costs in 2020. He stated if the Cares Act pays for legitimate staffing costs and results in some savings, at year end that could potentially increase the fund balance and provide an opportunity to have a backstop for 2021 COVID impacts , such as property taxes not being paid or other costs experienced. He added the policy is that the general fund balance is 45% of the full balance, so any surplus then can address COVID impacts in 2021. Councilmember Rog noted the Cleargov.org portal is very beneficial about where money is going. She added she supports this tool and encouraged the council and residents to look at it. 3.Future study session agenda planning and prioritization Councilmember Harris stated she submitted forms on the housing stabilization fund using CARES Act funding but noted this might not be needed since the city has already funded STEP for emergency rental funds. Councilmember Mavity stated the city has the housing trust fund, an existing vehicle to allocate and administer funds if needed, so there is a way to support this already. Councilmember Harris asked about creating a public health coordinator role at the city, noting that many other suburban cities have this role on their teams. Councilmember Brausen stated designating this position seems to be the role of the city manager and the council has given him our priorities, but he should decide if this is a role and expenditure the city needs. He would prefer this over discussing it at a study session. Councilmember Kraft stated he would be interested in a discussion of this. Councilmember Rog stated she does not feel this is the time to add a public health official, but noted there is value in having an expert in this area on staff, and it does fit well with the council’s planned conversations about community policing. Councilmember Mavity agreed this is an important issue but should be discussed within the broader policing discussion. Mayor Spano stated he is not interested or supportive of creating a staff role for this, but added it is up to Mr. Harmening to decide if it is needed. He stated other cities have their own public health departments, but St. Louis Park’s is run by Hennepin County. He also agreed this should be discussed around policing and public safety. M r. Harmening stated staff will prepare a report for council on how public health is addressed in the city and provide a better picture of how it looks today, while including police and other aspects of public health as well. Page 8 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 3d) Title: Study session minutes of August 10, 2020 Councilmember Brausen noted the Dakota pedestrian bridge project written report, which is over budget again. He reiterate d his support and encouraged staff to sign the contracts and do the project now as it won’t get cheaper in the future. He stated it is a major public works project that the city has promised, and the community wants it done. Councilmember Kraft stated the project fills a gap in our network ; howe ver, he is very concerned about the debt and increases in coming years on the levy . He questioned the benefit of the bridge, how many will use it, how many car trips are eliminate d per day, and what will it do for the city. He added he is increasingly uncomfortable with the price of it. Ms. Heiser stated the cost noted in the report is the most current and added she will provide debt service information in the next report and will present that at the Aug. 17, 2020 meeting. Mr. Harmening noted for the Mon., Aug. 17, 2020 meeting, staff can provide a compilation of existing debt and future debt for this project and others for the next 5 years, so council can see how things fit together in the long term. Councilmember Kraft added he would like to see more than just one year on the budget especially as it relates to climate crisis. Mr. Harmening stated staff has a tool that is all built on assumptions and can be manipulated to include a long-range model. He stated this will be reintroduced to council. Communications/meeting check-in (verbal) Councilmember Kraft noted work being done on the Trillion Trees program, which is a concept where if one trillion trees are planted around the globe , it would not solve climate change, but would help as a key tool to remove gases. He noted if this is t ranslate d to St. Louis Park, and tree planning is increased to 1,000 trees per year, we can make a difference. He noted this project is early in discussions and partnerships and structure are being investigated, but Mr. Harmening suggested he update the council on it. Mr. Harmening stated staff has brought in Tree Trust to work on this also, and there will be more information to come. Ms. Solano stated on Wed., Aug. 12, from 5-5:30 p.m., there will be a ribbon cutting ceremony for the Walker Lake mural. She stated an email with details will be sent to council and noted all attending should wear face masks and social distance. The meeting adjourned at 8:55 p.m. Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only: 4.Update – PLACE’s Via project – mechanic’s lien 5.Update for Dakota Ave Bikeways and Dakota Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 ______________________________________ ______________________________________ Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4a Executive summary Title: Approval of city disbursements Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of July 25, through August 28, 2020. Policy consideration: Does the city council desire to approve city disbursements in accordance with Section 6.11 – Disbursements – How Made, of the City’s Charter? Summary: The Finance Division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the city council to review and approve. The attached reports show both City disbursements paid by physical check and those by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable. Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the city’s charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: City disbursements Prepared by: Kari Mahan, accounting clerk Reviewed by: Melanie Lammers, chief financial officer Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 797.10 EARL F ANDERSEN INC INSTALLATION OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 797.10 1.004 FRONT ENERGY SOLUTIONS BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 100.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A MECHANICAL 101.00 140.45A SILBERT DEIKEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 140.45 687.50A WOK IN THE PARK ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 14.49A-1 OUTDOOR POWER INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 29.99TREE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 44.48 31.25Abiy Elphato BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 129.44ABLE HOSE & RUBBER INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 129.44 2,237.50AC ST. LOUIS PARK ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 675.00ACACIA ARCHITECTS LLC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 675.00 3,464.75ACE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, INC. REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 820.50AQUATIC PARK BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 4,285.25 472.00ACME TOOLS ROUTINE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 11.50DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 483.50 8.75Adrienne Cairn Caldwell BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 21,487.71ADVANCED ENG & ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 2 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 995.00WATER UTILITY G&A ENGINEERING SERVICES 21,487.71SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 21,487.71STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 65,458.13 96.25Advanced Healing Center BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 96.25Advanced Recovery Massage BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 60.40AFFORDABLE ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 60.40 31.25Ai Ling Zhang BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 875.00ALBERTSSON HANSEN ARCHITECTURE LTD MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 875.00 31.25Alexandra Mae Daniels BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 560.00ALL CITY ELEVATOR INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 560.00 1,550.00ALL ELEMENTS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,550.00 5,094.00ALLIANCE MECH SRVCS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 5,094.00 1,480.92ALLIED BLACKTOP PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 1,480.92 5,505.98ALLSTREAMIT G & A TELEPHONE 5,505.98 31.25Amanda Lynn Scott-Lerdal BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 3 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 3Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 96.25Amazing Man LLC dba Amazing Masage BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 501.79AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 501.79 31.25Amber Colleen Simmons BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Amelia Grace Voyen BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Amelia Michelle Bryant BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 1,007.30AMERICAN ENGINEERING TESTING INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,007.30 90.54AMERICAN PRESSURE, INC.BLDG/GROUNDS OPS & MAINT BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 90.54 83.00AMERICAN TRAFFIC SAFETY SERVICES ASSOC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 83.00 3,868.00AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOC WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 3,868.00 399.87AMERIPRIDE LINEN & APPAREL SERVICES FIRE OPERATIONS HEALTH & WELLNESS 399.87 31.25AMY LEANN KLEMZ BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 56.00ANCHOR SCIENTIFIC INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 56.00 31.25Andrea Zitzloff BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Andrew Arthur Raak BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 4 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 4Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25Angela Marie Stelljes BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Angela Watson Baumgart BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Ann Bonnell Beane BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Anna Catherine Coughlen BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Anna Grace Madge Preston BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 31.25Anthony Noel Marks BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,237.50APPLEBEE’S ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 31.25April Podhradsky BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 603.75ARC DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS LLC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 603.75 570.00ART SPARK LLC ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 570.00 11,821.00ARVIG CONSTRUCTION INC GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 11,821.00 31.25Ashley Marie Parker BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 4,608.00ASPEN LAWN SERVICE/SIPE'S ENTERPRISES IN ROUTINE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,608.00 691.19ASPEN MILLS FIRE OPERATIONS UNIFORMS City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 5 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 5Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 691.19 1,682.00AT YOUTH PROGRAMS LLC.TENNIS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,682.00 1,149.34ATIR ELECTRIC CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 756.37MUNICIPAL BLDG IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 1,905.71 116.62ATOMIC RECYCLING FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 116.62PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 116.62WATER UTILITY G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 116.64VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 466.50 281.25AVI SYSTEMS INC CABLE TV G & A REPAIRS 17,638.89GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 17,920.14 77.68BAKER ELIZABETH REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 77.68 100.00BARDELL RON GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.00 7,336.50BARR ENGINEERING CO GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,830.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,166.50 174.78BATTERIES + BULBS WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 174.78 2,215.75BECKER ARENA PRODUCTS UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 2,215.75 600.00BENENSON DAVID SOFTBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 600.00 687.50BEST OF INDIA ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 6 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 6Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 48,160.00BETTER FUTURE MINNESOTA GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 48,160.00 96.25Big Hand Therapy BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 325.00BIRNO BLAKE R.PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 325.00 325.00BIRNO, GRANT PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 325.00 503.40BLACKBURN MFG. CO WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 503.40 687.50BLAZE PIZZA ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 50.00BLIND INSTALLATION AND REPAIR FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 50.00 96.25Blue Mountain Healing Arts BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 687.50BOARD & BRUSH ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 50.54BOLTON & MENK INC SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,237.28STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,766.96PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,445.26WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 351.15SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,933.31STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 16,784.50 2,625.00BORMANN CONSTRUCTION INC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,625.00 96.25BOULEVARD CHIROPRACTIC CLINIC, PA BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 7 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 7Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 747.66BOUND TREE MEDICAL, LLC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 3,301.02FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 4,048.68 2,000.00BR ENTERPRISES OF MN, INC.ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,000.00 1,392.50BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 7,470.69STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 626.40PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 456.46WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 681.21SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 828.24STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,455.50 36.00BREDEMUS HARDWARE COMPANY INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 36.00 508.79BREKKE ALBRIGHT KRISTEN NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 508.79 31.25BridgetteTiffany Lovelace-Cokett BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Brooke Lee Rosenfeldt BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,500.00BROWN MERLIN ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 494.05BRYAN ROCK PRODUCTS INC ALLEY MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 494.05 72.47BUFFINGTON, GILBERT REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 72.47 222.75BURIA MEGAN AND CHRIS GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 222.75 1,701.28BUSINESS ESSENTIALS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 1,701.28 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 8 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 8Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 8.75Byron Todd Jacboson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 620.00C&E AUTO UPHOLSTERY GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 620.00 2,500.00CALLCO HOMES, LLC.ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 6,073.72CAMPBELL KNUTSON PROF ASSOC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 610.50PRINTING/REPRO SERVICES OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,089.00ENGINEERING G & A LEGAL SERVICES 66.00HOUSING REHAB G & A LEGAL SERVICES 49.50SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 602.55STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A LEGAL SERVICES 2,623.40STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 66.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 231.00SOLID WASTE G&A LEGAL SERVICES 11,411.67 2,007.97CANON FINANCIAL IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,007.97 2,000.00CAPTIVATE MEDIA & CONSULTING COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,000.00 8,332.00CARE RESOURCE CONNECTION FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,332.00 31.25Carolyn Jane Wharton BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Cassandra Sue Garza BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 16,725.50CDW GOVERNMENT INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 16,725.50 1,354.83CENTER ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT DISCOUNT LOAN PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 9 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 9Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 15,550.00DOWN PYMT ASSISTANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,354.83 300.00CENTER FOR ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 900.00MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,600.00DOWN PYMT ASSISTANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,800.00 96.25Center Point Massage BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 2,545.79CENTERPOINT ENERGY FACILITY OPERATIONS HEATING GAS 70.96HOUSING REHAB BALANCE SHEET LAND HELD FOR RESALE 805.18WATER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 43.82REILLY G & A HEATING GAS 208.20SEWER UTILITY G&A HEATING GAS 239.34PARK MAINTENANCE G & A HEATING GAS 9,363.66REC CENTER BUILDING HEATING GAS 13,276.95 1,000.00CENTRAIRE HEATING & AIR CONDITIONING, IN PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,000.00 13.71CENTRAL MCGOWAN POSTAL SERVICES OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 289.80REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 156.17AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 459.68 15,330.00CENTRAL PENSION FUND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT OTHER RETIREMENT 15,330.00 111.64CENTURY LINK CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 111.64 550.00CFS INSPECTIONS PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 550.00 8.75Chao Gao BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 225.00CHARLES LEVIN ARCHITECTS MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 10 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 10Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 225.00 300.00CHEF MARSHALL O'BRIEN LLC FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 300.00 31.25Chelsea Marie Hoppe BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 1,800.00CHEM SYSTEMS LTD REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,800.00 2.35CHIONG SUSANA BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 140.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 142.35 31.25Christine Thao BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Christopher Stephen Anderson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 144.97CINTAS CORPORATION FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 201.16FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 340.37FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.41REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 84.41AQUATIC PARK BUDGET CONCESSION SUPPLIES 351.85AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 513.85VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,721.02 29,300.00CITIES DIGITAL TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 29,300.00 230.30CITIZENS INDEPENDENT BANK GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 186.09ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 244.12ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 78.44ADMINISTRATION G & A MEETING EXPENSE 52.00ADMINISTRATION G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 1.20HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL SUPPLIES 757.28HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 1,450.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 11 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 11Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 65.31HUMAN RESOURCES MEETING EXPENSE 55.77COMM & MARKETING G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46.00COMM & MARKETING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 119.00ASSESSING G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 409.95ASSESSING G & A TRAINING 200.00ASSESSING G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 127.90ASSESSING G & A LICENSES 610.00FINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 15.00COMM DEV PLANNING G & A TRAINING 1,429.05FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 14.77-POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 54.44POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 100.00POLICE G & A OFFICE EQUIPMENT 2,194.72POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 63.89POLICE G & A POSTAGE 4,353.00POLICE G & A TRAINING 2,880.84POLICE G & A TRAVEL/MEETINGS 16.39POLICE G & A MEETING EXPENSE 233.05POLICE G & A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 42.79FIRE OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 362.91FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 339.98FIRE OPERATIONS FIRE PREVENTION SUPPLIES 1,384.75FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 488.06FIRE OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 537.35FIRE OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 10.00FIRE OPERATIONS REPAIRS 3,897.27FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 1,272.00-FIRE OPERATIONS SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 2,606.93BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 55.38-BLDG & ENERGY G & A TRAINING 15.26-SUSTAINABILITY G&A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 348.30PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 67.50PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 47.55PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MEETING EXPENSE 53.06ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 334.56ROUTINE MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 20.56PAINTINGGENERAL SUPPLIES 569.28CABLE TV G & A OTHER 893.44WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,001.64WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 330.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 12 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 12Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 122.59WATER UTILITY G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 75.64WATER UTILITY G&A BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 1,109.48TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 23.13ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 675.00ORGANIZED REC G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 79.03ORGANIZED REC G & A INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES 48.35VOLLEYBALLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 109.28SOFTBALLGENERAL SUPPLIES 13.43SOFTBALLOPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2.99SPECIAL EVENTS GENERAL SUPPLIES 827.89PLAYGROUNDSGENERAL SUPPLIES 198.65T-BALL/BASEBALL GENERAL SUPPLIES 369.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 464.82PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 13.97PARK MAINTENANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 129.94SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIES 249.99NATURAL RESOURCES G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 878.00REFORESTATIONLANDSCAPING MATERIALS 418.36WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 3.99SUMMER CAMP GENERAL SUPPLIES 28.88REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 467.14REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 37.33REC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 1,578.44AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,361.01LIFEGUARDINGGENERAL SUPPLIES 44.06CONCESSIONSGENERAL SUPPLIES 377.49CONCESSIONSCONCESSION SUPPLIES 38,661.11 277.15CLARKE LISA ASSESSING G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 277.15 19,150.40COLICH & ASSOCIATES ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL SERVICES 19,150.40 3,125.16COLLINS ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION CO DAMAGE REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,799.00INSTALLATIONOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 634.11SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 351.61SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,909.88 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 13 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 13Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 126.18COMCASTFIRE OPERATIONS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 106.82CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32.70OTHER CITY DEPARTMENTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3.37WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29.47REC CENTER BUILDING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 298.54 16,978.73COMMERCIAL ASPHALT COMPANY PATCHING-PERMANENT OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 674.64WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 17,653.37 284.00COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT FUND MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.00 778.50-CONCRETE TREATMENTS GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 15,570.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 14,791.50 1,076.00CONTINENTAL RESEARCH CORP REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,076.00 175.00COPPERWINGADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 175.00 7,245.88CORE & MAIN LP WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 7,245.88 95,800.00CORPORATE MECHANICAL PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 3,482.65REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 1,915.78REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,342.50AQUATIC PARK BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 102,540.93 2,960.00COURT SURFACES & REPAIR, INC.PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,960.00 2,237.50COURTYARD MINNEAPOLIS WEST ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 10,970.00COVERALL OF THE TWIN CITIES FACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,970.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 14 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 14Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,500.00CRAFT HOMES LLC ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 2,237.50CraveADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 284.00CRF USA MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 284.00 2,500.00CROWE PATRICK ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 2,500.00 149.70CROWN RENTAL - BURNSVILLE PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 920.24TREE MAINTENANCE SMALL TOOLS 1,069.94 3,072.24-CURB MASTERS, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 61,444.80GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 58,372.56 103.81CUSHMAN RONALD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 103.81 20,898.17CUSTOM PRODUCTS & SERVICES SSD 1 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,230.66SSD 2 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8,634.98SSD 3 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,943.98SSD #4 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,924.45SSD #5 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,021.06SSD #6 G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,713.00BEAUTIFICATION/LANDSCAPE LANDSCAPING SERVICE 69,366.30 200.00CUTSHALL MATTHEW ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 200.00 31.25Cyarra Monique Swanson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 4,357.00DAKOTA GLASS & GLAZING, LLC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,357.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 15 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 15Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 7,712.42DALCO ENTERPRISES INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY 71.80REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 7,784.22 318.00DAMA METAL PRODUCTS, INC.PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 318.00 8.75Danica Krizic BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 31.25Daniel James O'Brien BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Daniel James Rexius BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Danielle Marie Kuefler BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 400.00DAVIS ELLEN AND GARY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.00 31.25Deborah A Peterson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Debra Elaine Grote BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 50.00DEMING DJ BLDG & ENERGY G & A LICENSES 50.00 6,500.00DENG HUAJIE ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 6,500.00 6,108.93DEPT LABOR & INDUSTRY BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 6,108.93 31.25Devin Ray Harwood BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 16 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 16Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25Diane R Pauly BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 212.50DJ ELECTRIC SERVICES INC SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 212.50 8,361.51DO-GOOD.BIZ INC COMM & MARKETING G & A POSTAGE 4,548.96COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 1,639.13ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 14,549.60 100.97DONNELLY- HICKS JEAN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 100.97 2,237.50DOUBLETREE MPLS PARK PLACE ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 1,856.40ECM PUBLISHERS INC ADMINISTRATION G & A LEGAL NOTICES 1,856.40 8.75Ed Pelava BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 3,750.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ESCROWS UNION PARK APTS 5,330.00FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 530.00S. CEDAR TRAILS HIA OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,610.00 105.00Eleacia Danielle Thesing BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 105.00 142.16ELECTIONS SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 142.16 286.22ELECTRIC MOTOR REPAIR WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 286.22 200.00ELECTRIC PUMP INC PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 2,376.00ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, LLC. PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 17 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 17Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,376.00 96.25Elements Massage St. Louis Park BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 31.25Eli Joseph Keranen BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 134.70EMERGENCY APPARATUS MTNCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 134.70 185.52EMERGENCY AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 3,105.55CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY 3,291.07 7,500.00EMLAVARTGO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 7,500.00 5,550.99ENTERPRISE FM TRUST EQUIP/VEHICLE REPLACEMENT RENTAL EQUIPMENT 5,550.99 227.25ENVIRONMENTAL WOOD SUPPLY LLC NATURAL RESOURCES G & A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 227.25 96.25Epic Bodyworks, LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 225.00ERIC J. HANSEN, AIA MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 31.25Eric James Osowski BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Ericka Lynette Johnson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 183.70ERICKSON, LEROY WATER UTILITY G&A TRAINING 183.70 31.25Erin Hewitt BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 18 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 18Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 3,420.20ESO SOLUTIONS INC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 3,420.20 1,954.00ESP INC PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,954.00 1,484.00ESS BROTHERS & SONS INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,484.00 1,474.50EUREKA CONSTRUCTION INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40,533.40-PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINAGE PAYABLE 232,773.93PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 113,467.47WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 352,921.10SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110,031.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 770,134.60 1,500.00EVERLAST ENTERPRISES STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL 1,500.00 1,147.83FACTORY MOTOR PARTS CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 12.78VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,160.61 1,500.00FAIOLA LISA ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,500.00 41.97FASTENALWATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 41.97 101.10FASTENAL COMPANY FIRE OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 140.33INSTALLATIONOTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 266.45WATER UTILITY G&A SMALL TOOLS 507.88 12.50FERGUSON CODY VOLLEYBALL PROGRAM REVENUE 12.50 106.11FERGUSON ENTERPRISES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 106.11 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 19 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 19Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,338.14FERGUSON WATERWORKS WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 5,338.14 31.60FERRELLGASGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 97.38REC CENTER BUILDING MOTOR FUELS 128.98 631.64FINANCE & COMMERCE, INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 631.64 4,199.12FIRE-DEX GW, LLC.FIRE OPERATIONS EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 4,199.12 24,162.98FISCHER MINING LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 24,162.98 74.00FISCHER NICOLE SUMMER CAMP REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 74.00 16.33FLADLAND DEREK FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 16.33 2,035.00FLAGSHIP RECREATION LLC MOWING GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,035.00PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 4,070.00 301.82FLOYD TOTAL SECURITY REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 301.82 500.00FOKKEN KYLE GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 500.00 99.95FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 630.53TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 730.48 477.75FRANCOUAL JOANNE NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 477.75 175.00Frank Lundberg American Legion ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 20 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 20Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 175.00 36.14FRANKSON KATHERYN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 36.14 29.97FRATTALLONE'S/SAINT LOUIS PARK RELAMPING OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 59.17WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 31.83REC CENTER BUILDING GENERAL SUPPLIES 2.39GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.36 2.39FRATTALONE'S/ST. LOUIS PARK VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2.39 66.00FRIEMEL PLUMBING AND DRAIN BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 66.00 96.25FUNCTION MASSAGE & ACUPUNCTURE BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 10,989.04GALLS, LLC - DBA UNIFORMS UNLIMITED POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 10,989.04 31.25Gary Clay Meyer BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 888.54GENERAL PARTS LLC AQUATIC PARK BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 888.54 924.00-GENERAL SHEET METAL COMPANY, LLC. GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 18,479.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 17,555.00 840.00GENERAL SPRINKLER CORP.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 840.00 3,160.60GERTENSPARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 3,160.60 3,247.50-GLACIAL RIDGE, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 64,950.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 21 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 21Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 61,702.50 11,181.10GMH ASPHALT CORPORATION SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 9,643.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,553.29-PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT B/S RETAINAGE PAYABLE 463,758.40PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 34,272.50PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 296,666.52WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 675.00WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 73,968.69SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 146,465.74STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,280.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 991,357.66 47.20GOLDEN VALLEY, CITY OF FITNESS PROGRAMS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 47.20 75.00Goldmark Property Mgmt BLDG & ENERGY G & A PUBLIC SANITARY FACILITIES 75.00 141.00GOPHER STATE FIRE EQUIPMENT CO.REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 141.00 1,113.75GOPHER STATE ONE-CALL INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,113.75 150.00GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATIONFINANCE G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 150.00 213.90GRAINGER INC, WW ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,001.30FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 112.50SYSTEM REPAIR SMALL TOOLS 127.14PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,454.84 114.61GRAY ELLEN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114.61 8,055.07GREAT RIVER GREENING PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 8,055.07 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 22 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 22Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 820.96GREEN HORIZONS WEED CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 820.96 98.06GRESSER-PITSCH GAIL REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 98.06 80.60GRUBB ELIZABETH REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80.60 8.75Guangxiu Gao BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 541.72HACH CO WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 541.72 96.25Halsa Institute Chiroractic BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 1,696.00HAMILTON, MIKE SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,696.00 9,000.00HAMMEL GREEN & ABRAHAMSON INC GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 9,000.00 8,721.20HANCOCK CONCRETE PRODUCTS LLC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 8,721.20 96.25Hand and Stone Massage BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 500.00HANSEN ANDREW ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 500.00 450.00HANSEN, ERIC MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 450.00 235.00HANSON CHARLES BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 235.00 1,700.00HANSON MATTHEW & KATE VOELKER ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,700.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 23 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 23Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 199.00HAVISTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 199.00 23,857.70HAWKINS INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 9,796.49AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 33,654.19 96.25Healthful Touch BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 57.00HEALTHPARTNERSHUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,228.00HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 1,470.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 2,755.00 149.95HEDBERG SUPPLY WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 149.95 174.00HENNEPIN COUNTY TREASURER IT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 7,500.00POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 3,158.65POLICE G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 6,846.70POLICE G & A JAIL/DETENTION SERVICES 4,919.86FIRE OPERATIONS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS 24.00HIA ADMIN OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 659.64PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 44.00AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 23,326.85 2,568.00HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE FIRE OPERATIONS TRAINING 2,568.00 119,325.95HENRICKSEN PSG GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 119,325.95 3,895.00HIGHVIEW PLUMBING INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,895.00 1.00HILGERS EMILY BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 66.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 24 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 24Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 98.52HIPP EARL REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 98.52 31.25Hirut H Keleta BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 583.56HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SUPPLY PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A EQUIPMENT PARTS 4.32-ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 639.85WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 40.34STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 56.60PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5.72PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 88.65PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE BLDG/STRUCTURE SUPPLIES 47.50PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 19.87PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 306.93PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 23.90BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS GENERAL SUPPLIES 183.93REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,992.53 391.70-HOMECO INSULATION, INC.GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 7,834.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 7,442.30 187.50HOMEWOOD SUITES ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 187.50 2,094.15HORIZON COMMERCIAL POOL SUPPLY AQUATIC PARK BUDGET MAINTENANCE 2,094.15 96.25Hot Stone LLC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 208.00HOWES, KRISTINE VOLLEYBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 208.00KICKBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 864.50SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,280.50 31.25Huining Liu BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 25 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 25Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25 1,785.00I.U.O.E. LOCAL NO 49 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNION DUES 1,785.00 200.00IACPPOLICE G & A SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 200.00 31.25Ian Matthew Gray BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 27.00ICE SPORTS INDUSTRY INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.00INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 54.00 615.00IDEAL SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 615.00 96.25Impact Massage & Bodywork BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 96.25Improved Health BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 395.98INDELCOWATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 395.98 214.58INGRAM THERESA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 214.58 266.40INTERNATIONAL TAE KWON DO ACADEMY YOUTH PROGRAMS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 266.40 1,294.68INVER GROVE FORD GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,294.68 31.25Iryna Artsikhovich BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 223.25J & F REDDY RENTS ADMINISTRATION G & A RENTAL EQUIPMENT 223.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 26 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 26Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 109.20J. H. LARSON CO.FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 3,074.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 3,183.20 225.00JACOBSON AMANDA GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 500.00JACOBSON KAREN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 31.25Jamie Michelle Alpert BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Jayne Carol Hoese-Berge BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Jayne Lyn Nemeth BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 96.25Jayne Nemeth BWS LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 119.00JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 119.00 31.25Jennifer A Campbell BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Jennifer Marie Kessler BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.99JERRY'S HARDWARE ROUTINE MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT PARTS 35.37WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 37.29PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 8.98PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 90.63 31.25Jessica Rae Lorentz BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 27 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 27Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 8.75Jill Kathryne Alleyne BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 62,508.95JL THEIS PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,240.77-STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 25,997.25PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,309.20STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 99,574.63 108.33JOHNSON CLAIRE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 108.33 140.00JOHNSON III JAMES SOCCER OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 128.50VOLLEYBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 156.00SOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 424.50 129.32JOHNSON KEITH AND SARAH REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 129.32 200.00JOHNSON MARY GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 31.25Jordan Ann Carlson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,500.00JR HULTMAN HOMES LLC ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 208.55-JSH CONSTRUCTION, LLC PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 4,171.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,962.45 31.25Juan Lu BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Julia Ruth Cook BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Juliana Francine Bertelsen BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 28 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 28Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25Julie Anne Ottis BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 1,275.00JULIUS B. NELSON & SON, INC PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,275.00 2,409.59-K.A. WITT CONSTRUCTION, INC.PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 48,191.84PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT SEMINARS/CONFERENCES/PRESENTAT 5,280.00PARK EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 51,062.25 1,436.80KAESER COMPRESSOR VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,436.80 31.25Karen S. Chang BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 75.00KARWACKI JOHN GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75.00 31.25Kasey Chad Vaughn BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Kathleen RaNae Rice BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 31.25Katrina Louise Michaels BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Kaylene Lynnette Rider BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 31.25Ke Sun BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Keely Shaye Wilkie BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Kelly Kurth Sanches BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 29 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 29Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25Kelly Montague BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 375.00KENNEDY & GRAVEN ESCROWS UNION PARK APTS 8,442.73ESCROWSDunn Brothers Coffee 3,861.70ESCROWSPLACE 1,722.50ESCROWSPLATIA PLACE 5,618.60ESCROWS4900 CEDAR LAKE RD 45.00HIA ADMIN LEGAL SERVICES 5,436.00S. CEDAR TRAILS HIA LEGAL SERVICES 25,501.53 31.25Kenneth John Parps BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,237.50Kerasotes Showplace Theatres ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 72.50BLDG & ENERGY G & A COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT 2,310.00 31.25Keri Rebecca Fullerton BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 250.00KEYSTONE COMPENSATION GROUP LLC HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 250.00 215.05KHABIE WENDY ROC DRY FLOOR RENTAL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 215.05 31.25Kiara S Nelson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 1,824.00KILLMER ELECTRIC CO INC WIRING REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,824.00 31.25Kirsten A Raines BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Kirsten Joy Heaton BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 30 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 30Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1,450.50KLEIN UNDERGROUND LLC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 1,450.50 93.62KLUCKHOHN BRUCE REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 93.62 910.00KNUTSON BRAD SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 910.00 96.25Kokua Therapeutic Massage BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 112.00KOPOSCHKE ALEX BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 112.00 10.00KRAFT ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 10.00 2,745.88KREMER SERVICES LLC GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 2,745.88 31.25Kristin Marilyn Edwards BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 1,604.16KROL MILA ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 1,604.16 625.00KROOG, RACHAEL PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 625.00 30.00KRUEGER DON BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 30.00 988.00KUBES, JON SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 988.00 31.25Kun Li BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 1,244.05LAMMERS MELANIE HUMAN RESOURCES RECRUITMENT 1,244.05 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 31 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 31Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 100.50LANDSCAPE RESTORATIONS, INC.INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO SMALL TOOLS 100.50 185.48LANGUAGE LINE SERVICES INC POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 185.48 31.25Laura Michelle Kasel BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 3,653.36LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES INC EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNION DUES 3,653.36 2,500.00LDK BUILDERS ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 114.00LE BINH KHAI BASKETBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 114.00 164,335.00LEAGUE OF MN CITIES INSURANCE TRUST P&C EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND G&A League of MN Cities dept'l exp 1,526.96UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 165,861.96 1,175.00LEGEND TECHNICAL SERVICES REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,175.00 1,200.00LEICA GEOSYSTEMS INC ENGINEERING G & A ENGINEERING SERVICES 1,200.00 8.75Leonid Metelitsa BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 175.50LEROY SIGNS BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 175.50 3,990.00LEVEL 10 CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER UTILITY BAL SHEET GENERAL 3,990.00 488.00LHB INC SUSTAINABILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 488.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 32 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 32Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 262.10LIBERTY TIRE SERVICES LLC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 262.10 1,510.00LINCO FAB, INC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,510.00 31.25Lindsey Alexandra Jarvis BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Ling Sun BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Lisa Fecarotta BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 500.00LLOYD ANDREW ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 500.00 2,428.50LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP REILLY G & A LEGAL SERVICES 2,428.50 2,500.00LODAHL, INC.ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 26.00LOFFLERIT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 26.00 1,944.77LOFFLER COMPANIES IT G & A EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,944.77 41,734.00LOGISIT G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 1,655.00ASSESSING G & A COMPUTER SERVICES 750.00CABLE TV G & A CAPITAL REPLACEMENT FUND 3,067.18GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 44,962.15TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 92,168.33 225.00LOON ARCHITECTS MOVE-UP PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 225.00 2,237.50LOOP WEST END, LLC.ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 33 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 33Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,237.50 8.75Louis Jeffery Newstrom BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 687.50LTF Club Operations Company Inc ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 96.25BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 783.75 2,641.80LUBE-TECH & PARTNERS LLC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 235.59VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,877.39 2,237.50Lucky Cricket ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 2,237.50Lund’s & Byerly’s ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 31.25Lynda Suzanne Christian BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,500.00M.T. CARPENTER LANDSCAPE ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 240.00MACMURRAY BEN VOLLEYBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 240.00 146.55-MACQUEEN EQUIP CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 215,288.00CAPITAL REPLACEMENT B/S INVENTORY 1,748.25GENERAL REPAIR EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 216,889.70 31.25Madeline Rose Grette BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 1,108.07MAGNACHARGE BATTERY USA, LLC.GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 1,108.07 2,386.00MAGNEY CONSTRUCTION INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 2,386.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 34 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 34Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 1.00MALINOWSKI ZACHARY BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 145.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 146.00 20,006.01MANSFIELD OIL COMPANY OF GAINSVILLE, INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 20,006.01 31.25Maria Ellen Scholz Boda BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 950.00MARIE RIDGEWAY LICSW LLC POLICE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 950.00 2,237.50MARRIOTT MINNEAPOLIS WEST ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 31.25Mary Ann Siverson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Mary Frances Sullivan BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 96.25Massage & Bodywork, LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 96.25Massage Energy Therapy Inc BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 96.25Massageworks, Inc.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 1,264.57MASTER TECHNOLOGY GROUP PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,264.57 31.25Matthew McCloney Waite BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,237.50McCoy’s Public House ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 35 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 35Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 250.00MCQUILLAN, BARB GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 250.00 4.50MEADE TRAVIS BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 200.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 204.50 80.00MELANDER ADRI PICNIC SHELTERS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 80.00 31.25Melissa Ann Kangas BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Melissa Lea Larson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 321.02MENARDSFACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 27.11PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.97ROUTINE MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 12.98WIRING REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 90.77PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 161.10WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 631.95 24.38MERIT ELECTRIC COMPANY BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 24.38 96.25Mesna Plastic Surgery BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 5,245.00METRO BLOOMS STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 5,245.00 51,688.00METROPOLITAN COUNCIL BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 342,225.95OPERATIONSCLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 393,913.95 31.25Michelle Marie Hodapp BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Michelle Renee Nyman BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 36 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 36Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25 2,237.50Mill Valley Kitchen ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 22,874.00MILLERBERND MFG CO SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 22,874.00 175.91MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP WATER UTILITY G&A EQUIPMENT PARTS 175.91 175.00Minneapolis Golf Club ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 175.00 1,299.46MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT PYT CTR EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS 1,299.46 3,736.00MINNESOTA CONTROL SYSTEMS, LLC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 320.00REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 4,056.00 180.00MINUTEMAN PRESS COMM & MARKETING G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 180.00 343.00MINVALCO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 343.00 367.53MN DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 367.53 2.97MOHLER CHIMNEY REPAIR BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 155.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 157.97 200.00MOORE MADALYN INSTRUCTIONAL SKATING LESSONS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00 9,485.50MOSS & BARNETT CABLE TV G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,485.50 27.50MPCAFACILITIES MCTE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 37 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 37Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 27.50 275.00MR CUTTING EDGE REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 275.00 2,275.00MRPASOFTBALLOTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,275.00 359.28MTI DISTRIBUTING CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 359.28 235.00MULLEN CYNTHIS BLDG & ENERGY G & A CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 235.00 5,000.00MUNICIPAL BUILDERS INC WATER UTILITY BALANCE SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 23,502.62WATER UTILITY G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 28,502.62 102.05MYERS ROY AND GILLIAN REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 102.05 775.50MYKLEBUST, JOHN STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 713.46PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62.04SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,551.00 96.25Mystic Studio LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 1,171.40-NAC MECHANICAL & ELECTRICAL SERVICES GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 23,428.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 22,256.60 1,770.41NAPA (GENUINE PARTS CO)GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 219.00FIRE OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 78.90WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 166.66PARK BUILDING MAINTENANCE GENERAL SUPPLIES 18.86REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 91.08VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 2,344.91 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 38 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 38Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 97.65NARTEC INC POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 97.65 4,002.00NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 4,002.00 96.25Natural Balance Massage Inc BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 861.24ND CHILD SUPPORT DIVISION EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS 861.24 96.25Neva Massage Center BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 16,666.66NICHOLAS LEGEROS INC GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 16,666.66 31.25Nicholas Roger Koenig BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 179.95NOKOMIS SHOE SHOP FACILITIES MCTE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 399.95WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 579.90 1,165.00NORDIC MECHANICAL SERVICES REC CENTER BUILDING EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,165.00 35,721.52NOR-SONS, INC.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,721.52 1,581.24NORTH AMERICAN SAFETY INC SEWER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,014.93PARK MAINTENANCE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 2,596.17 75.00Northen States IndoorTan LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A PUBLIC SANITARY FACILITIES 75.00 19.50NORTHERN AIRE POOLS INC SPLASH PAD MAINT - Oak Hill Pk GENERAL SUPPLIES 19.50 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 39 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 39Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 89.39NORTHERN SAFETY TECHNOLOGY INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 89.39 3,273.67NORTHLAND MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 3,273.67 33,500.00NORTHSTAR COMPANIES COVID-19 CARES FUNDING G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 33,500.00 703.69OAK KNOLL ANIMAL HOSPITAL POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 703.69 383.33OFFICE DEPOT FINANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 153.69POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 71.81FIRE OPERATIONS OFFICE SUPPLIES 231.97BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 79.45ORGANIZED REC G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 920.25 120.00OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 120.00 100.00OFFICE TEAM COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 100.00 81.66OLSEN CHAIN & CABLE CO INC PARK MAINTENANCE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 81.66 334.79ON SITE SANITATION NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 233.32PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 163.00FIELD MAINT GENERAL SUPPLIES 6,481.12FIELD MAINT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 114.50SOCCER/FOOTBALL FIELDS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 211.00OFF-LEASH DOG PARK OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,537.73 12.57O'REILLY FIRST CALL GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 12.57 15,250.01OVERLAY CONSULTING SUSTAINABILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 15,250.01 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 40 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 40Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 939.22OXYGEN SERVICE COMPANY INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 939.22 296.25PACE ANALYTICAL SERVICES INC REILLY G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 296.25 .08PALM PATRICIA BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 67.63BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 67.71 41.25Pampered Pooch Playground LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A DOG KENNELS 41.25 500.00PANDAY RAJNISH GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500.00 500.00PARK DENTAL LARGE EVENTS - ADMIN FEE REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 500.00 2,237.50Park Tavern ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 687.50Parkway Pizza ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 90.42PARTSTREE.COM GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 90.42 15,000.00PAUL DON ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 15,000.00 1.00PEDERSEN DAVID BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 66.00 108.00PEDERSON RYAN SUMMER CAMP REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 108.00 236.00PERFECTION HEATING AND AIR BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 236.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 41 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 41Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 525.00PERNSTEINER CREATIVE GROUP INC COMM & MARKETING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 525.00 7,000.00PERSONAL PRIDE CONSTRUCTION LTD ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 7,000.00 161.30PERTTUNEN JORDAN ICE RENTAL RENT REVENUE 161.30 3.99PETTY CASH ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 10.74ENGINEERING G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 7.80ENGINEERING G & A TRAINING 38.00PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A LICENSES 18.26CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.74WATER UTILITY G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 11.00WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 35.80WATER UTILITY G&A LICENSES 26.50PARK MAINTENANCE G & A TRAINING 34.49VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A OFFICE SUPPLIES 77.41VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 21.00VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A LICENSES 10.32GENERAL REPAIR GENERAL SUPPLIES 306.05 2,673.86PFM ASSET MANAGEMENT CITY POOLED INVESTMENTS BANK CHARGES/CREDIT CD FEES 2,673.86 685.84PHELAN REBECCA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 685.84 317.16PHILLIPS TREE CARE LLC PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 970.08INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,287.24 687.50PINOT'S PALETTE ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 2,500.00PMI DIRECT, LLC.ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 42 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 42Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 16,382.40POMP'S TIRE SERVICE INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 16,382.40 1,195.00POVOLNY SPECIALTIES SYSTEM REPAIR OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,195.00 1,107.50PRAIRIE RESTORATIONS INC INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 5,342.50INVASIVE PLANT MGMT/RESTORATIO OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,657.50BEAUTIFICATION / FLOWERS LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 10,107.50 281.25PRECISE MRM LLC PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 281.25WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 281.25SEWER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 281.25STORM WATER UTILITY G&A MACHINERY & AUTO EQUIPMENT 1,125.00 320.00-PREFERRED PROPERTIES, INC.PARK IMPROVE BALANCE SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 6,400.00PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,080.00 585.29PREMIUM WATERS INC FIRE OPERATIONS OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 585.29 81.49PRONTO HEATING AND AIR BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 81.49 2,237.50Punch Bowl Social ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 96.25Pure Body Therapy BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 31.25Quinne Frances Patchin BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 5,000.00RACHEL CONTRACTING INC ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 5,000.00 31.25Rachel Lyn Day BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 43 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 43Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 2,237.50RACKNER, INC.ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 1,473.60RAINBOW COMPANIES PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,802.38TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 34,275.98 178.00RAINBOW TREECARE TREE MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 178.00 2,237.50Raku Sushi & Lounge ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 120.59RAND DOROTHY REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 120.59 8,602.68RANDY'S ENVIORMENTAL SERVICES FACILITIES MCTE G & A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 1,046.86GRANTSGARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 4,605.63REC CENTER BUILDING GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 14,255.17 8.75Rebecca DiAnn Olson BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 150.00RECTENWALL LAUREN ROC DRY FLOOR RENTAL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 150.00 123.24RED WING BUSINESS ADVANTAGE ACCOUNT BLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 123.24 200.00RED WING STORE WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 200.00 27,202.00REDPATH & COMPANY FINANCE G & A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 469.00CABLE TV G & A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 938.00HOUSING REHAB G & A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 4,690.00WATER UTILITY G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 5,628.00SEWER UTILITY G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 2,814.00SOLID WASTE G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC 2,345.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A AUDITING AND ACCOUNTING SERVIC City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 44 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 44Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 44,086.00 116.62REGENCY OFFICE PRODUCTS, LLC.POLICE G & A OFFICE SUPPLIES 116.62 687.50REM 5 ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 96.25Reset LLC BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 77.60REUBEN SARAH NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 77.60 31.25Ricardo Torres BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 221.88RIGID HITCH INC GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 221.88 895.00ROBARGE ENTERPRISES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 895.00 994.14ROBERT B HILL CO FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 343.38REC CENTER BUILDING OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,337.52 7,002.21ROBERT HALF TECHNOLOGY FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 7,002.21 2,237.50Rojo Mexican Grill ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 72.50Roller Garden BLDG & ENERGY G & A COMMERCIAL ENTERTAINMENT 72.50 20.42ROSHOLT, PAUL FIRE OPERATIONS GENERAL SUPPLIES 20.42 90.00ROTARY CLUB OF SLP ADMINISTRATION G & A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 90.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 45 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 45Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25Ruth Atherly BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 530.70-S & S CONCRETE AND MASONRY GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 10,614.00GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 10,083.30 139.40S & S WORLDWIDE INC PLAYGROUNDS GENERAL SUPPLIES 139.40 96.25Sabes Jewish Community Center BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 96.25Sage Health & Wellness BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 12.35SAHA MAINAK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 12.35 96.25Salt Salon Spa BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 31.25Samantha Anne Walker BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 62.65SAM'S CLUB CONCESSIONS INTEREST/FINANCE CHARGES 62.65 31.25Sara Marie Wold BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Sarah Elizabeth Ford BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 75.00Saturday Properties*BLDG & ENERGY G & A PUBLIC SANITARY FACILITIES 75.00 2,098.00SAVATREETREE DISEASE PRIVATE CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 2,098.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 46 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 46Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 228.15SCHAAKE COMPANY, AJ HUMAN RESOURCES RECOGNITION 228.15 2,500.00SCHERBER COMPANIES ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 2,500.00 69.39SCHMITZ SAM & BROOKE WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 69.39 96.25Schroeder Chriopractic BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 440.59SCHUTZ MEGAN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 440.59 31.25Scott William Gavin BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 10.86SEJKORA PATRICK WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 10.86 150.00SEMKE LORI PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 150.00 675.00SETS DESIGN INC.POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 415.00POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,090.00 63.00SHADYWOOD TREE EXPERTS & LANDSCAPING PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,942.50TREE DISEASE PUBLIC CLEANING/WASTE REMOVAL SERVICE 5,005.50 31.25Shan Shan Zhu BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Shannon Julie Souza BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 975.00SHAPCO PRINTING INC COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 975.00 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 47 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 47Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 31.25Sharon Blair Ritterspach BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 473.39-SHAW STEWARD LUMBER COMPANY GO BONDS - NATURE CTR BAL SH RETAINAGE PAYABLE 9,467.87GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 8,994.48 31.25Shayna Leavitt Rissman BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Sherrie Murray-Huotari BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 7.50SHIFFER FERRIS BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 327.50BLDG & ENERGY G & A PLUMBING 335.00 1,000.00SHIMOTA ZACHARY ESCROWS PMC ESCROW 1,000.00 12,890.60SHORT ELLIOTT HENDRICKSON, INC.SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDI 12,890.60 17.54SHRED-IT USA MINNEAPOLIS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 32.64FINANCE G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 549.97POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17.54ORGANIZED REC G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 218.20WESTWOOD G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 835.89 152.31SHUBEEBLDG & ENERGY G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 152.31 15,171.35SIDEKICKTECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 15,171.35 7,950.50SIGNATURE MECHANICAL INC REC CENTER BUILDING BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 7,950.50 36,506.20SIR LINES-A-LOT PAINTING OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 36,506.20 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 48 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 48Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 97.37SITEONE LANDSCAPE SUPPLY LLC IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 97.37 17.49SIWEK LUMBER & MILLWORK INC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 17.49 96.25Sky Blue Shiatsu BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 150.00SLATTENGREN ERIN PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 150.00 1,670.40SLP FF ASSOC IAFF LOCAL #993 EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNION DUES 1,670.40 1,200.00SLP SEEDS HUMAN RESOURCES GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 1,200.00 364.00SMITH, PERRY SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 364.00 646.00SMSC ENTERPRISES PARK GROUNDS MAINTENANCE OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 646.00 96.25Soluna Health and Wellness BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 11,600.00SPACK SOLUTIONS, INC.ENGINEERING G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 11,600.00 23,747.85SPECIALIZED ENVIRONMENTAL TECH INC SOLID WASTE G&A YARD WASTE SERVICE 15,178.63SOLID WASTE G&A ORGANICS 2,000.00NATURAL RESOURCES G & A LANDSCAPING MATERIALS 40,926.48 96.25Spine Care, P.A.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 475.95SPS COMPANIES INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 475.95 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 49 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 49Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 12,376.94SRF CONSULTING GROUP INC SIDEWALK & TRAILS G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 12,376.94 160.00ST. LOUIS PARK HISTORICAL SOCIETY GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET CLEARING ACCOUNT 160.00 8.75Stacie Lynne Chilton BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 121.81STANGL, MATT REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 121.81 37.90STAR TRIBUNE SOLID WASTE G&A SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 37.90 150.00Steel Toe Brewing ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 150.00 31.25Stephaine Jo Salak BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Stephanie Ann Landrum BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 1,490.00STORM WIND LLC TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT OFFICE EQUIPMENT 1,490.00 310.73STOTESBERY MICHAEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 310.73 66.00STRAUSS SHELBY SUMMER CAMP REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 66.00 6,406.67STREICHER'S POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 6,406.67 37.53STUDER PAUL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 37.53 96.25Studio U BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 50 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 50Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 96.25 71.40STUTZMAN CHAD REFORESTATION FUND OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 71.40 1.00SUBURBAN ELECTRIC BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 66.00 1.00SULLIVAN LUKE BLDG & ENERGY G & A DUE TO OTHER GOVTS 65.00BLDG & ENERGY G & A ELECTRICAL 66.00 411.55SUMMIT COMPANIES FIRE OPERATIONS REPAIRS 411.55 13,536.27SUMMIT ENVIROSOLUTIONS INC REILLY G & A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 13,536.27 275.00SUN CONTROL OF MINNESOTA INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 275.00 9,213.69SUNDE LAND SURVEYING LLC GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,213.69 31.25Susan Helen Lundquist BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 31.25Susan Lynn Askevold BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 8.75Suwaporn Pui Heuer BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 111.76SWIGART DEL WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 111.76 11,542.44SYSCO-MINNESOTA INC CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 11,542.44 425.00TALKINGTON TED GREEN REMODELING PROGRAM OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 51 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 51Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 425.00 31.25Tanya Dee Long BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 175.00TAPCODAMAGE REPAIR OTHER IMPROVEMENT SUPPLIES 175.00 687.50TASTE OF INDIA ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 300.00TATE SARAH PLAYGROUNDS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 300.00 105.00TEMPLAR LODGE #176 PICNIC SHELTERS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 105.00 230.69TERMINAL SUPPLY CO VEHICLE MAINTENANCE G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 230.69 2,237.50TEXA-TONKA LANES ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 2,237.50TGI FRIDAY’S ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 31.25Thang Ho BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,237.50The Block ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 150.00The Dampfwerk Distillery ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 150.00 2,237.50THE LOCAL ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 328.47THE MPX GROUP ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 971.91COMM & MARKETING G & A PRINTING & PUBLISHING 1,300.38 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 52 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 52Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 5,000.00THE NETWORK FOR BETTER FUTURES ESCROWS DEMO / BROOKSIDE TRAFFIC 5,000.00 400.00THE PARK THEATER COMPANY PERFORMING ARTS OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 400.00 4,600.00THE SIGN PRODUCERS ADMINISTRATION G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,159.00FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 5,759.00 13.40THE UPS STORE WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 13.40 8,789.68-THOMAS AND SONS CONSTRUCTION, INC. STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 174,643.61STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 950.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 200.00STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 167,003.93 8.75Thomas Stockton Rotman BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 304.74THOMSON REUTERS WEST PAYMENT CENTER POLICE G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 304.74 1,053.50TIMESAVER OFF SITE SECRETARIAL ADMINISTRATION G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,053.50 50.93TODDY ANDREW WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 50.93 11.35TOLL GAS & WELDING SUPPLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL SUPPLIES 11.35 31.25Tony Joseph Schwartz BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 399.80TOWMASTERGENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 399.80 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 53 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 53Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 4,907.85TRAFFIC AND PARKING CONTROL CO., INC. UNINSURED LOSS G&A UNINSURED LOSS 4,907.85 598.00TRAUTMANN, JOHN SOFTBALL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 598.00 533.75TRI STATE BOBCAT GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 533.75 1,238.91TRI-DIM FILTER CORP.FACILITIES MCTE G & A GENERAL SUPPLIES 1,238.91 6,340.00TRIMARK HOCKENBERGS PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,340.00 1,586.00TUBE PRO INC AQUATIC PARK BUDGET OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 1,586.00 4,691.00TWIN CITY FIREPLACE & STONE COMPANY GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 4,691.00 171.97TWIN CITY SAW CO GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 171.97 31.25Tyler Jordan Grant BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 874.42UHL CO INC FACILITIES MCTE G & A BUILDING MTCE SERVICE 5,183.45GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 782.67WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 782.67SEWER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 782.66STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 8,405.87 67.76ULINEPOLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 67.76 31.25Ulises Jair Zarate BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 150.00UNITED WAY OF MINNEAPOLIS AREA EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT UNITED WAY City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 54 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 54Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 150.00 204.30URBAN SELECTS ICE RENTAL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 204.30 242.46US AUTOFORCE GENERAL FUND BALANCE SHEET INVENTORY 242.46 985.83US DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY EMPLOYEE BENEFITS FUND BAL SHT WAGE GARNISHMENTS 985.83 133,639.71VALLEY PAVING INC STREET CAPITAL PROJ BAL SHEET RETAINAGE PAYABLE 51,241.67STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,544.00WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 127.20SEWER CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,869.66STORM WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 201,422.24 9,197.64VALLEY-RICH CO INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 13,397.92SEWER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 22,595.56 673.58VAN PAPER COMPANY CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 673.58 76.47VARGAS GREG WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 76.47 75.33VAUGHAN, JIM NATURAL RESOURCES G & A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR 75.33 96.25Veda Yoga Therapy LLC.BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 96.25 31.25Vellvet Jeron Jones BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 151.26VEREN ISAAC WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 151.26 50.04VERIZONSEWER UTILITY G&A TELEPHONE City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 55 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 55Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 14,562.83CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.OFFICE EQUIPMENT 72.46CELLPHONES, IPADS, ETC.TELEPHONE 14,685.33 31.25Victoria Jo Ruiz BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 717.57VIKING INDUSTRIAL CTR WATER UTILITY G&A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 717.57 2,465.00VINCO, INC.CABLE TV G & A OTHER 2,465.00 210.00VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS' BENEFIT ASSN MN FIRE OPERATIONS SUBSCRIPTIONS/MEMBERSHIPS 210.00 40.00WAGNER DOUGLAS PICNIC SHELTERS REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 40.00 692.85WARNING LITES OF MN INC TRAFFIC CONTROL OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 692.85 222,859.40WASTE MANAGEMENT OF WI-MN SOLID WASTE G&A GARBAGE/REFUSE SERVICE 80,657.31SOLID WASTE G&A RECYCLING SERVICE 48,188.40SOLID WASTE G&A YARD WASTE SERVICE 70,923.44SOLID WASTE G&A ORGANICS 422,628.55 937.28WATER CONSERVATION SERVICE INC WATER UTILITY G&A OTHER IMPROVEMENT SERVICE 937.28 5,663.90WATSON CO INC CONCESSIONS CONCESSION SUPPLIES 5,663.90 119.74WEBER JORDAN & LAUREN WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 119.74 56.24WEBER RICHARD WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 56.24 687.50WEINBERG BROTHERS INVEST. CO., LLC. ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 56 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 56Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 687.50 5,119.05WHEELER HARDWARE CO.PARK IMPROVE CAPITAL PROJECT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,119.05 5,975.00WILLMAR WOOD PRODUCTS INC GO BONDS - NATURE CENTER G&A BUILDINGS & STRUCTURES 5,975.00 135.80WILSON CLARICE ART OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 135.80 70.99WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY GROUP INC FIRE OPERATIONS SMALL TOOLS 275.93FIRE OPERATIONS PROTECTIVE CLOTHING 346.92 120.00WITTIG ALEXANDER VOLLEYBALL REFUNDS & REIMBURSEMENTS 120.00 66.25WOLF AARON WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 66.25 40.52WOLGEMUTH, KARLA NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION GRANT OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.52 100.00WRAP CITY GRAPHICS POLICE G & A OPERATIONAL SUPPLIES 100.00 232.00WS & D PERMIT SERVICE BLDG & ENERGY G & A BUILDING 232.00 773.00WSB ASSOC INC STORM WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL PROFESSIONAL SERVICES 773.00 1,255.00WW GOETSCH ASSOCIATES INC AQUATIC PARK BUDGET EQUIPMENT MTCE SERVICE 1,255.00 30,071.31XCEL ENERGY FACILITIES MCTE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 19,431.02PUBLIC WORKS OPS G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 435,993.00STREET CAPITAL PROJ G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 39,289.24WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 1,191.34REILLY G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 57 8/28/2020CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:49:46R55CKS2 LOGIS400V 57Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection. 8/28/20207/25/2020 - Amount ObjectVendorBU Description 129.62SEWER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 7,124.55STORM WATER UTILITY G&A ELECTRIC SERVICE 3,228.52PARK MAINTENANCE G & A ELECTRIC SERVICE 30.13BRICK HOUSE (1324)ELECTRIC SERVICE 125.89WW RENTAL HOUSE (1322)ELECTRIC SERVICE 536,614.62 8.75Xiaofang Hu BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 8.75 31.25Xiaoli Liu BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,237.50YANGTZE RIVER RESTAURANT ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 31.25YanYan Rinta BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 2,237.50YARD HOUSE ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 2,237.50 31.25Ying Chen BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 687.50Yum! Kitchen and Bakery ADMINISTRATION G & A LIQUOR 687.50 31.25Zang Xiong BLDG & ENERGY G & A MASSAGE THERAPY ESTABLISHMENTS 31.25 89.66ZASTROW KELLY WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 89.66 71.77ZIEGLER SAMANTHA WATER UTILITY G&A GENERAL CUSTOMERS 71.77 Report Totals 6,229,507.91 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4a) Title: Approval of city disbursements Page 58 Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4b Executive summary Title: V acation for a portion of 14th Street east of Colorado Ave nue and w est of t he railroad Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance vacating portions of 14th Street right-of-way east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication. Policy consideration: Is the right-of-way needed for public purposes? Summary: The Davis Group requests a vacation of a portion of the 14th Street West right-of way located east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad tracks . This request is associated with several other applications regarding the proposed Xchange Medical Office building at 6009 Wayzata Boulevard. Those applications were approved by city council 6 to 0 on August 17, 2020, and the plat approval is contingent upon the approval of the right -of-way vacation approval. 14t h Street West currently dead ends at the de velopment site. There are no utilities in the right-of- way and the city would retain 25 feet past the existing driveways to accommodate snow storage. There is no public purpose to retaining the right-of-way requested to be vacated, and city staff supports the request. The property owner of Thermetic Products Inc., located at 1405 Colorado Ave nue S., contacted staff on August 10, 2020 and said they do not oppose the vacation. City council held a public hearing on August 17, 2020 and no members of the public spoke. The council voted 6 to 0 to approve the first reading of the Ordinance. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Right-of-way vacation ordinance V acation ordinance summary for publication Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4b ) Page 2 Title: Vacation for a portion of 14th Street east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad Ordinance No. ___-20 An ordinance vacating public right-of-way Portions of 14th Street located south of Wayzata Boulevard between Colorado Avenue and the railroad right-of-way The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Section 1. The petition to vacate the alley right-of-way was initiated by Patrick Giordana on behalf of The Davis Group. SLP Investment Partners LLC C/O The Davis Group, is the owner of the majority of all properties abutting upon both sides of the right-of-way proposed to be vacated. The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor on August 6, 2020, and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the right-of-way is not needed for public purposes, and that is it for the best interest of the public that said right-of-way be vacated. Section 2. The following described right-of-way as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park, is vacated: That part of the north half of West 14th Street, dedicated in the plat of JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota as Mount Curve Ave., lying westerly of the southerly extension of the west line of Lot 23, Block 1, said JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION and lying easterly, northerly and easterly of a line beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 4, said JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION; thence on an assumed bearing of North 02 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds East, along the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 4, a distance of 9.02 feet; thence North 89 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds East 21.48 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 00 seconds West 40.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds West 19.70 feet to said northerly extension of the west line of Lot 4; thence North 02 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds East, along said northerly extension of the west line of Lot 4, a distance of 11.00 feet to the south line of Block 1, said JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION and said line there terminating. And That part of south half of West 14th Street, dedicated in the plat of JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota as Mount Curve Ave., lying easterly of a line perpendicular to the center line of said West 14th Street which passes through the northwest corner of Lot 3, Block 4, said JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION and lying easterly, southerly and easterly of a line beginning at the northwest corner of Lot 4, Block 4, said JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION; thence on an assumed bearing of North 02 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds East, along the northerly extension of the west line of said Lot 4, a distance of 9.02 feet; thence North 89 degrees 36 minutes 00 seconds East 21.48 feet; thence North 00 degrees 24 minutes 00 seconds West 40.00 feet; thence South 89 degrees 36 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4b ) Page 3 Title: Vacation for a portion of 14th Street east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad minutes 00 seconds West 19.70 feet to said northerly extension of the west line of Lot 4; thence North 02 degrees 08 minutes 52 seconds East, along said northerly extension of the west line of Lot 4, a distance of 11.00 feet to the south line of Block 1, said JOHN A. JOHNSONS ADDITION and said line there terminating. S ection 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. S ection 4. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading August 17, 2020 Second reading September 8, 2020 Date of publication September 17, 2020 Date ordinance takes effect October 2, 2020 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4b ) Page 4 Title: Vacation for a portion of 14th Street east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad Right of way vacation exhibit: City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4b ) Page 5 Title: Vacation for a portion of 14th Street east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4b ) Page 6 Title: Vacation for a portion of 14th Street east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad SUMMARY FOR PUBLICATION Ordinance No. ____-20 An ordinance vacating right-of-way This ordinance states that portions of 14th Street right -of -way east of Colorado Avenue and west of the railroad will be vacated. This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication. Adopted by the City Council September 8, 2020 Jake Spano /s/ Mayor A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk. Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: September 17, 2020 Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4c Executive summary Title: West End Office Park minor amendment to special permit Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to approve the minor amendment to the special permit for landscaping improvements to the West End Office Park. Policy consideration: Does the project meet the zoning requirements for a minor amendment to the special permit? Summary: The existing courtyard at the West End Office Park (5353, 5401 Gamble Drive and 5354, 5402 Parkdale Drive) was built in the 1970s. The owner would like to renovate the space in order to create a more active, usable outdoor amenity space where tenants can work, gather, and spend time outdoors. The proposal includes removing the water fountain and leveling some of the mounds on the site, creating open lawn space, covered seating and working areas and a new pedestrian connection with an accessible ramp connecting the site with the Shops at West End across the street. The buildings and parking lots will remain unchanged and the site will be updated to meet landscaping and lighting requirements in the zoning code. The scope of the project requires a minor amendment to the special permit (Resolution 5405). Minor amendments do not require a public hearing or planning commission review. Staff find the application meets the requirements for a minor amendment to the special permit. This proposal was introduced to city council in a study session report August 24, 2020. Staff did not receive any comments or questions from council members. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Resolution Aerial of project site Project plans Prepared by: Jacquelyn Kramer, associate planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4c ) Page 2 Title: West End Office Park minor amendment to special permit Resolution No. 20-____ Amends and Restates Resolution No. 5404 Resolution granting permit under S ection 6:176.3 of the zoning ordinance to provide for an industrial development unit of four office buildings located in the I-2 industrial district on property bounded by Gamble Drive, Vernon Avenue, Cedar Lake Road and the Burlington Northern Spur Track Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park: Findings Whereas, Terry Minarik of Confluence, Inc. has made application to the City Council for an amendment to an existing special permit under Section 36-37 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code to allow landscaping improvements at 5353, 5401 Gamble Drive and 5354, 5402 Parkdale Drive within a O Office Zoning District having the following legal description: All that part of the South 1/2 of the South 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, Township 29 North, Range 24 West, Hennepin County, Minnesota lying Northerly of the Northerly right-of-way line of Cedar Lake Road; lying Easterly of the Easterly right of way line of Vernon Avenue; lying Southerly of a line drawn parallel with and 66 feet Southerly, measure d at right angles, from the following described line: Beginning at a point in the West line of said Section 30, which point is 200 feet south of the North line of said South 1/2 of the Southwest Quarter of Section 30, as measured at right angles to said North line, thence running S 0° 40 1 40" E along said West line of Section 30 a distance of 258.6 feet to the actual point of be-ginning of the line to be described, thence running N 89° 19' 20" E a distance of 680.10 feet, more or less, to a point in the So utherly extension of the West line of Registered Land Survey No. 864, files of the Registrar of Titles, County of Hennepin, said point being 424.97 feet South of the South-west corner of said Registered Land Survey No. 864 as measured along said Southerly extension, and there terminating: and lying Westerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the Southerly extension of the West line of said Registered Land Survey No. 864, said point being 424.97 feet South of the Southwest corner of said Registered Land Survey No. 864 as measured along said Southerly extension, thence running S 89° 19 1 20" W a distance of 7.12 feet to the actual point of beginning of the line to be described, thence running S o0 35 1 39" E a distance of 704.77 feet, more or less, to a point in said Northerly right of way line of Cedar Lake Road and there terminating. For the purpose of this description said Southerly exten-sion of the West line of Registered Land Survey No. 864 is considered to be a line bearing North. Whereas, the City Council has considered the information related to Planning Case Nos. 75-62-SP and the effect of the proposed site improvements on the health, safety, and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4c ) Page 3 Title: West End Office Park minor amendment to special permit on values of properties in the surrounding area and the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan; and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance; and Whereas, due to proposed landscape improvements, amendments to those conditions are now necessary, requiring the further amendment of the special permit granted under Resolution No. 5404; and Whereas, it is the intent of this resolution to restate the conditions of the permit granted by Resolution No. 5404, to add the amendments now required, and to consolidate all conditions applicable to the subject property in this resolution; and Whereas, the contents of Case No. 20-14-SP are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Conclusion The special permit to permit an Industrial Development Unit consisting of four office buildings is granted based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site be developed, used, and maintained in accordance with Exhibit “A,” Survey; Exhibit “B,” Site Plan; Exhibit “C,” Landscape Plan; Exhibit “D,” Ground Floor and Elevations; Exhibit “E,” First Floor and Side Elevations; Exhibit “F,” Second Floor and Side Elevation; Exhibit “G,” Phase I Developme nt Plan; except as modified by the following conditions: a. A Utilities Plan shall be prepared for the entire site which shall be labeled Exhibit “H,” Utilities Plan, and said plan shall be approved by the Director of Public Works before any building permits are issued for the site as described above. b. The roof top equipment penthouse shall be completed with metal insu lating panels identified as INRYCO wall system IW-31A. c. Pedestrian access shall be provided from the central courtyard area to Gamble Drive and to Cedar Lake Road to facilitate drop off and access to other areas within the development area. d. Signs shall be restricted to name-plate signs properly Integrated within the architectural context of the building. e. The use of the site shall be limited to not more than 170,000 square feet of office and 17,000 square feet of retail sales and service. f. All construction, buildings, parking areas, landscaping, lighting, pedestrian facilities, and plazas shall be completed by December l, 1979. 2. The special permit shall be amended on September 8, 2020 to incorporate all of the preceding conditions and the following conditions: a. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the Official Exhibits incorporated by reference herein. b. Prior to any site work, applicant shall meet the following conditions: i. Applicant shall sign assent form and official exhibits. ii. All required permits shall be obtained prior to starting construction, including but not limited to: City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4c ) Page 4 Title: West End Office Park minor amendment to special permit 1. NPDES Grading/Construction Permit. 2. City of St. Louis Park Erosion Control and Building Permits. 3. A stormwater management permit from the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. iii. The applicant shall provide to the City a financial guarantee in the form of a Letter of Credit or Cash Escrow to ensure the installation and survival of all landscaping materials. The financial guarantee shall be in the amount of 125% of the cost of the landscaping materials and installation. Upon installation, 25% will be reserved for a warranty period of one year to guarantee the survival of the trees and plantings. c. A building permit is required, which may impose additional conditions. 3. In addition to any other remedies, the developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 4. Under the Zoning Ordinance, this permit shall be revoked and cancelled if the building or structure for which the permit is granted is removed. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this resolution in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4c ) Page 5 Title: West End Office Park minor amendment to special permit Aerial of project site Project scope extents Site perimeter B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S SIDEWALK WEST END #2BM B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S B I T I M I N O U S RETAINING WALLSIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALKSIDEWALK # 5354# 5402# 5401# 5353WEST END #3P A R K I N G R A M PP L A Z A P L A Z A WALKP L A Z A WALKWA L K P L A Z A WA L K POOLP L A Z AP L A Z A CURB CUT CURB CUT CURB CUT CURB CUT CURB CUT CURB CUT CURB CUTWEST END #1WEST END #419253898.93373 16 S TA LL S 18888893.58799 VA UL T 19252898.79373 16 S TA LL S 19245899.44373 16 S TA LL S 19251899.30373 16 S TA LL S 19244899.4 7 373 1 6 ST AL LS 18728889.8 4 373 8 ST A LL S 18727889.41373 8S T AL LS 18734890.28373 4S T AL LS 19250899.4 5 373 1 6 ST AL LS 18726889.1 7 373 8 ST A LL S 18729889.6 3 373 8 ST A LL S 18735890.5 3 373 4 ST A LL S 18214890.84373 5S T AL LS 18252889.63373 7S T AL LS 18247890.1 0 373 5 ST AL L S 18215890.92373 10 S TA LL S 18197890.3 8 373 8 ST A LL S 18199888.22373 6S T AL LS 18257888.80373 6S T AL LS 18198888.79373 9S T AL LS 16971891.17373 7S T AL LS 16998890.4 7 373 3 ST A LL S 17009890.93373 6S T AL LS 16987890.8 2 373 3 ST A LL S 16976891.1 5 373 5 ST A LL S 16986891.06373 4S T AL LS 16993889.99373 5S T AL LS 16992890.52373 5S T AL LS 18204889.1 9 373 7 ST A LL S 16999891.2 0 373 7 ST A LL S 18209890.2 6 373 5 ST A LL S 17004891.0 6 373 5 ST A LL S 16981890.95373 6S T AL LS 18242890.95373 5S T AL LS Parkdale DrGamble DrGamble DrParkdale BlvdParkdale Blvd Parkdale DrENTRYFFE=894.48ENTRYFFE=894.51ENTRYFFE=894.51ENTRYFFE=894.52ENTRYFFE=894.52ENTRYFFE=894.466666S0°59'39"E 638.77S76°59'20"W 241.70366.00 272.77N2°28'33"W3.85S87°31'50"W4.82N0°35'40"W141.28 S83°37'37"W 151.09L=130.21,R=1123.92∆=6°38'17"L=168.81,R=103.00∆=93°54'06"∆=0°48'L=15.58∆=5°51'L=114.63N12°59'34"W1.0066S88°55'17"W5.14N2°40'23"E3.89N1°04'39"W51.00 N88°55'21"E15.00N1°04'40"W 29.00 S88°55'21"W15.00N4°44'33"E 94.53 N1°04'40"W 189.53 N47°43' 4 2 " E 30.77 N88°55'20"E184.31N86°19'24"E152.19N6°47'16"W10.85S4°40'18"W66.46 N1°10'28"W4.60N88°55'20"E252.88EDGE OF GRAVEL ENTRYFFE=894.46ENTRYFFE=894.51LEGENDCONCRETE PAVEMENTBOUNDARYSIGNAGECURBSTORMSEWERFIBRE OPTICELECTRICGASCONSTRUCTION LIMITSMINOR CONTOUR INTERVALMAJOR CONTOUR INTERVALBIRCH TREEHACKBERRY TREEMAPLE TREEPINE TREEASH TREEELM TREELINDEN TREEFOUND IPSTORM MHAREA DRAINCURB INLETLIGHTLEGENDSCALE IN FEET0File Location: H:\2020\2020-110.1 West End Office Plaza Design\dwg\Civil\03-Production Sheets\2020-110 C1 - EXCND / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX NOT FORCONSTRUCTION530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359CONTACT: TERRY MINARIK, PLA, ASLAtminarik@thinkconfluence.comREVISION SCHEDULEISSUE DATEDESCRIPTION107.31.20CUP SUBMITTALCONFLUENCE PROJECT # 20090LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTCONFLUENCEOWNERREVIEW SET08.03.2020THE SCALE INDICATED IS FOR 22"x34" DRAWING SHEETS;11"x17" SHEETS ARE HALF THE INDICATED SCALECOPYRIGHT © 2019 BY CONFLUENCEALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS ANINSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDEDFOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE ORDISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUTPRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLYPROHIBITED.WEST END OFFICE PARK COURTYARD BRIDGE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, LLC ST. LOUIS PARK, MN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.PRINTED NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LICENSE #:XX.XX.2020C100EXISTINGCONDITIONS(PER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE PROVIDED BY DAKOTA COUNTY ABSTRACTAND TITLE CERTIFICATE NO. 1501834, DATED MAY 4, 2020)TRACTS C, D, H, AND I, REGISTERED LAND SURVEY NO. 1481, HENNEPINCOUNTY, MINNESOTADESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYEDCity councilo meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4c) Title: West End Office Park minor amendment to special permitPage 6 LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN KEYNOTE LEGEND:BSTEEL EDGERCONCRETE WALKDECORATIVE PAVINGLANDSCAPE PLANTING BEDFLEX / OPEN LAWNHAMMOCK GROVECUSTOM PERGOLA, SEE DETAILSUPFIT PERGOLA, SEE DETAILSGRILL, SEE DETAILSSITE FURNITURE, SEE DETAILSBOCCE BALL COURTADA ACCESSIBLE RAMPBOARDFORM CIP BENCHSCREENING FENCE, SEE DETAILSWATER FEATURE, SEE DETAILSFIRE TABLE, SEE DETAILS1:20 SCALE IN VIEWPORTCDEFGHIJKLNOPAMCONCRETE PAVINGDECORATIVE PAVINGSODPLANT BEDARTIFICIAL TURFLANDSCAPE SITE PLAN HATCH LEGEND:BM 1888 8 893.5 8 799 V AUL T 18728889.8 4 373 8 ST AL LS 18727889.4 1 373 8 ST AL LS 1873 4 890. 28 373 4S TA LL S 18726889.1 7 373 8 ST AL LS18729889.6 3 373 8 ST AL LS 1873 5 890.5 3 373 4 ST AL LS 18214890.84373 5STALLS 18252889.63373 7STALLS18247890.10373 5 STALLS18215890.92373 10STALLS 18197890.38373 8STALLS 18199888.22373 6STALLS18257888.80373 6STALLS18198888.79373 9STALLS16971891.17373 7STALLS16998890.47373 3STALLS 17009890.93373 6STALLS16987890.82373 3STALLS 16976891.15373 5STALLS16986891.06373 4STALLS 16993889.99373 5STALLS16992890.52373 5STALLS 18204889.19373 7STALLS16999891.20373 7STALLS 18209890.26373 5STALLS17004891.06373 5STALLS16981890.95373 6STALLS 18242890.95373 5STALLSParkdale DrGamble DrParkdale BlvdParkdale Blvd Parkdale Dr6666S0°59'39"E 638.77 N1°04'40"W 256.13 N88°55'20"E 632.88∆=0°48'L=15.58∆=5°51'L=114.6366EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2744501EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2744501 EASEMENT PER DOC. NO. 2744501GHK JJJJFLAAMIMDRPNNNNIQ8.0'26.0'55.2'4.0'18.7'52.7'67.3'26.0'19.5'16.0'17.9'37.7'74.6'16.0'MMM13.9'38.1'10.0'7.5'18.7'8.0'52.1'8.0'48.6'81.6'33.0'GEDDDDAAAAAADFile Location: N:\2020\20090_West End Office Park\20090_WORKING\AUTOCAD\SHEETS\20090 - LS100 SITE PLAN / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX SCALE:40'80'20'10'0'1"=40'01SITE PLANOVERALL SITE PLANLS100File Location: N:\2020\20090_West End Office Park\20090_WORKING\AUTOCAD\SHEETS\20090 - LS100 SITE PLAN / Drawn by: XX / Checked by: XX NOT FORCONSTRUCTION530 N THIRD ST, SUITE 120MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401PH: 612.333.3702 FAX: 515.288.8359CONTACT: TERRY MINARIK, PLA, ASLAtminarik@thinkconfluence.comREVISION SCHEDULEISSUE DATEDESCRIPTIONCONFLUENCE PROJECT # 20090LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTCONFLUENCECONDITIONALUSE PERMITSUBMITTAL SET08-03-2020THE SCALE INDICATED IS FOR 22"x34" DRAWING SHEETS;11"x17" SHEETS ARE HALF THE INDICATED SCALECOPYRIGHT © 2019 BY CONFLUENCEALL RIGHTS RESERVED. THIS DRAWING IS PROVIDED AS ANINSTRUMENT OF SERVICE BY CONFLUENCE , AND IS INTENDEDFOR USE ON THIS PROJECT ONLY. ANY REPRODUCTION, USE ORDISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN WITHOUTPRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT OF CONFLUENCE IS STRICTLYPROHIBITED.WEST END OFFICE PARK COURTYARD BRIDGE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE, LLC ST. LOUIS PARK, MN I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION, AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.PRINTED NAME:SIGNATURE:DATE:LICENSE #:Terry Minarik08/03/202042242City councilo meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4c) Title: West End Office Park minor amendment to special permitPage 7 Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8 , 2020 Consent agenda item: 4d Executive summary Title: Accept donation from CenterPoint Energy Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a monetary donation from CenterPoint Energy to allow the police department to purchase a Portable Data Network. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept the gift with restrictions on its use? Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on the use of each donation prior to it being expended. CenterPoint Energy has graciously donated $1,600 to allow the police department to purchase a Portable Data Network (PDA). The PDA would be used to provide Wi-Fi access for police and fire personnel responding to a critical incident in the community. The new PDA would allow the police department to update obsolete equipment in the communications van used to provide Wi-Fi capabilities. On June 1, 2020, council adopted a resolution to accept a $1,500 donation from the American Legion which was dedicated to fund 50% of the PDA purchase. The acceptance of the CenterPoint Energy donation will now allow for the purchase of the PDA. The city attorney has reviewed this matter. His opinion is that state law permits the payment of such expenses by this organization, regardless of whether the funds come from primary or secondary sources. It is treated as a gift to the city and there needs to be a resolution adopted by the city council determining that acceptance of this gift serves a public purpose. Financial or budget considerations: None Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Mike Harcey, police chief Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4d) Page 2 Title: Accept donation from CenterPoint Energy Resolution No. 20-___ Accept donation from CenterPoint Energy Whereas, The City of St. Louis Park is required by State statute to authorize acceptance of any donations; and Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the donor. Now therefore be it resolved, That CenterPoint Energy has graciously donated $1,600 to allow the police department to purchase a Portable Data Network (PDA). The PDA would be used to provide Wi-Fi access for police and fire personnel responding to critical incidents in the community. It is further resolved, by the city council of the City of St. Louis Park , that the gift is hereby accepted with thanks to CenterPoint Energy for their generosity and support of the police department’s commitment to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council Sept. 8, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4e Executive summary Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as Time Sensitive** •Motion to approve a Memorandum of Understanding with the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and the United States Marshals Service for the 2021 Presidential Inauguration. Policy consideration: Will this experience provide for valuable training for our police officers? What cost will the city incur? Summary: The Presidential Inauguration is the largest national security event in the United States. To provide safety and security for the inauguration, the Metropolitan Police Department and the United States Marshals Service request assistance from law enforcement agencies across the country for every inauguration. This year, we were asked by the Minnetonka Police Department to join a group of agencies that we work with closely to provide officers for the inauguration security detail. The other agencies included in the group are the Edina, Hopkins, Eden Prairie and the South Lake police departments. Staff feels this is a very unique training opportunity for our officers to gain experience in the planning and implementation of security for large scale events and to foster partnerships with our neighboring communities. All costs associated with travel, lodging and meals are reimbursed by the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department. The St. Louis Park Police Department has selected nine officers to assist in the security detail, which will not impact our staffing or require any additional costs to the City. The memo of understanding has been reviewed and approved by St. Louis Park City Attorney Soren Mattick. Financial or budget considerations: None, the memorandum of understanding provides for reimbursement of salary and benefits, travel, lodging and meals for participating St. Louis Park police officers. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Memorandum of Understanding Prepared by: Mike Harcey, police chief Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is executed by the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, the Metropolitan Police Department of Washington, D.C. (MPD) and the City of St. Louis Park Police Department. I.PURPOSE The purpose of the MOU is to outline the mission of the Presidential Inauguration Task Force (PITF) in the Washington, D.C. area from Sunday, January 17, 2021, to Thursday, January 21, 2021. Additionally, this MOU defines relationships between the U.S. Marshals Service, MPD and the City of St. Louis Park Police Department, as well as other participating agencies with regard to policy, guidance, utilization of resources, planning, training, public relations and media in order to maximize interagency cooperation. II.MISSION The mission of the PITF is to achieve maximum coordination and cooperation in bringing to bear combined resources to effectively implement measures to promote the safety of the President of the United States, inaugural participants, the public, visitors and residents while allowing individuals and groups to exercise their legal rights. Additionally, all units that are participating agencies will coordinate their activities and be considered a member of the PITF, sharing information and coordinating investigative and law enforcement efforts which may result from any apprehensions originating from the PITF. III.ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE A.Direction The City of St. Louis Park Police Department acknowledges that the PITF is a joint operation in which all agencies, including the MPD, the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia, United States Marshals Service, United States Secret Service, United States Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Park Service, the City of St. Louis Park Police Department and other agencies, act as partners in the operation of the PITF. The Command Center for the operations will be located at the MPD Headquarters and will be staffed by officers from the United States Marshals Service, MPD, U.S. Park Police, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. These officers will serve as the Executive Council for this operation. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4e) Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Page 2 B. Supervision The day-to-day operation and administrative control of the PITF will be the responsibility of MPD’s Inaugural Planning Committee Commanding Officer. The Inaugural Planning Committee Commanding Officer will coordinate with supervisory personnel of the United States Secret Service as the sponsoring agency for Special Deputation (federal) and with MPD as the lead agency for the operation. The daily management of the PITF will be closely monitored by the MPD. Responsibility for the conduct of the PITF members, both personally and professionally, shall remain with the respective agency directors subject to the provisions in Section IX (Liability). C. Unilateral Law Enforcement Action There shall be no unilateral action taken on the part of any participating non-federal or non-MPD law enforcement agency relating to PITF activities. All law enforcement action by participating non-federal and non-MPD law enforcement agencies must be coordinated and conducted in a cooperative manner under the direction of the Executive Council and the MPD. IV. PROCEDURES A. Personnel Continued assignment of personnel to the PITF will be based upon performance and will be at the discretion of the respective agency. Each participating agency will be provided with reports as necessary regarding the program, direction, and accomplishment of the PITF. B. Deputation All local and state law enforcement personnel designated to the PITF will be subject to background inquiry and will be federally deputized, with the United States Marshals Service securing the required deputation authorization. These deputations will remain in effect throughout the tenure of each officer’s assignment to the PITF or until termination of the PITF, whichever occurs first. Each individual deputized as a Special Deputy U.S. Marshal will have all necessary law enforcement authority as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 566(c) and (d); 28 U.S.C. § 564; 18 U.S.C. § 3053; 28 C.F.R. § 0.112, and the deputation authority of the Deputy Attorney General. The Special Deputy U.S. Marshals will be responsible for: 1) performing necessary law enforcement steps to keep the peace of the United States; 2) enforcing federal law (e.g., 18 U.S.C. §§ 112, 1116, and 878, as well as other provisions of that title); 3) protecting visiting foreign officials, official guests, and internationally protected persons; 4) taking necessary law enforcement steps to prevent violations of federal law, and; 5) enforcing District of Columbia law as a result of the deputation (see D.C. Official Code § 23-581 and 28 U.S.C. § 564). City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4e) Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Page 3 3 Individuals deputized as Special Deputy U.S. Marshals pursuant to this MOU who suffer a disability or die as a result of personal injury sustained while acting within the course and scope of their official duties and assignments pursuant to this MOU shall be treated as a federal employee as defined by Title 5 U.S.C. § 8101. Any such individuals who apply to the U.S. Department of Labor for federal workers’ compensation under Section 3374 must submit a copy of this MOU with his or her application. All applicants will be processed by the U.S. Department of Labor on a case-by-case basis in accordance with applicable law and regulation. C.Law Enforcement Activities Since it is anticipated that almost all cases originating from any PITF arrests will be prosecuted at the state or local level, the law enforcement methods employed by all participating law enforcement agencies shall conform to the requirements of the relevant state or local statutory or common law pending a decision as to a change of venue for prosecution. D.Prosecution The criteria for determining whether to prosecute a particular violation in federal or state court will focus upon achieving the greatest overall benefit to law enforcement and the community. Any question which arises pertaining to prosecutorial jurisdiction will be resolved through the Executive Council. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia has agreed to formally participate in the PITF and will adopt policies and seek sentences that meet the needs of justice. V. ADMINISTRATIVE A.Records and Reports All records and reports generated by PITF members shall be routed through MPD’s Inaugural Planning Committee Commanding Officer who shall be responsible for maintaining custody and proper dissemination of said records and reports as he or she deems appropriate. B.Staff Briefings Periodic briefings on PITF law enforcement actions will be provided to the directors of the participating agencies or their designees. Statistics regarding accomplishments will also be provided to the participating agencies as available. VI.MEDIA All media releases pertaining to PITF law enforcement activity and/or arrests will be coordinated by the Executive Council. No unilateral press releases will be made by any City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4e) Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Page 4 participating agency without the prior approval of the Executive Council. No information pertaining to the PITF itself will be released to the media without Executive Council approval. VII. EQUIPMENT A.PITF Vehicles Each participating agency, subject to availability and individual agency policy, agrees and authorizes PITF members to use vehicles, when available, owned or leased by those participating agencies, in connection with PITF law enforcement operations. Each participating agency agrees to be responsible for any negligent act or omission on the part of its agency or its employees, and for any liability resulting from the misuse of said vehicles, as well as any damage incurred to those vehicles as a result of any such negligent act or omission on the part of the participating agency or its employees, subject to the provisions of Section IX (Liability). Participating agency vehicles assigned to the PITF are subject to funding availability, are provided at the discretion of the supervisor of the providing agency, and will be used only by PITF members. Vehicles provided by participating agencies will be used only during working hours and will not be used for transportation to and from work by task force members or used for any other purpose. Participating agencies will provide maintenance and upkeep of their vehicles consistent with each agency’s policy. Vehicles provided as pool vehicles for PITF use will be parked at the end of each shift at a location determined by MPD’s Inaugural Planning Committee Commanding Officer or his/her designee. B.Other Equipment Other equipment furnished by any agency for use by other agencies’ participating personnel shall be returned to the originating agency upon termination of the PITF or this MOU. VIII.FUNDING The City of St. Louis Park Police Department agrees to provide the full-time services of its respective personnel for the duration of this operation, and to assume all personnel costs for their PITF representatives, including salaries, overtime payments, and fringe benefits consistent with their respective agency policies and procedures. Reimbursement for the cost of such personnel will be made by the District of Columbia, with funds provided by the United States and from general revenue. IX.LIABILITY Unless specifically addressed by the terms of this MOU, the parties agree to be responsible for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of their respective employees. Liability for PITF employees’ acts or omissions undertaken outside the terms of this MOU are City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4e) Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Page 5 5 the sole responsibility of the respective employee or agency involved. For the limited purpose of defending tort claims arising out of PITF activity, state or local law enforcement officers who are specially deputized as Deputy U.S. Marshals may request that the Attorney General or his designee certify under 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d) that the officer was an employee of the U.S. government acting in the scope of office or employment at the time of the incident out of which the claim arose. Upon certification, the United States is substituted as the defendant under the Federal Tort Claims Act and the case proceeds against the United States. This procedure does not apply to claims for violations of federal constitutional or statutory rights. See 28 U.S.C. 2679(b)(2). Decisions regarding certification under § 2679 are made on a case-by-case basis and no guarantee is made that any PITF personnel will be certified under this provision. PITF-deputized officers may request representation by the U.S. Department of Justice for individual-capacity civil claims arising from actions taken within the scope of deputation under this MOU. See 28 C.F.R. § 50.15. The Department of Justice determines whether to provide individual-capacity representation on a case-by-case basis applying the criteria in § 50.15. Legal representation by the Department of Justice is discretionary and not guaranteed. To request certification of scope of employment under 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d) or legal representation under 28 C.F.R. § 50.15, a PITF-deputized officer should submit a written request to the Civil Division of the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia. The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia will forward the request to the Civil Division of the United States Department of Justice together with a recommendation concerning scope of employment as a deputized federal officer and Department representation. 28 C.F.R. § 50.15(a)(3). A PITF-deputized officer may request indemnification for an adverse judgment under the circumstances set forth in 28 C.F.R. § 50.15(c). Indemnification decisions are discretionary and made on a case-by-case basis. Indemnification is not guaranteed. PITF officers from participating agencies covered by the provisions of § 7302 of the National Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, PL 108-458, 118 Stat. 3538, as amended, and PL 110-250, 122 Stat. 2318 (“the Act”), also have the liability protection afforded by the Act X.DURATION This MOU shall remain in effect until the conclusion of the PITF as specified in Part I (Purpose) above, unless that date is modified as set forth in Section XI, and subject to the availability of necessary funding. The United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia or the Metropolitan Police Department may terminate this agreement at any time. The City of St. Louis Park Police Department may withdraw from this MOU at any time by City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4e) Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Page 6 6 providing a seven-day written notice of its intent to withdraw to the MPD. Upon the termination of the MOU, all equipment will be returned to the supplying agencies. XI.MODIFICATIONS The terms of this MOU may be modified at any time by written consent of all parties. Modifications to this MOU shall have no force and effect unless such modifications are reduced to writing and signed by an authorized representative of each participating agency. XII.LIMITATION Nothing in this MOU is intended to, or shall be construed to create enforceable rights in third parties. MURIEL BOWSER MAYOR DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MICHAEL R. SHERWIN ACTING UNITED STATES ATTORNEY DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAKE SPANO MAYOR ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA TOM HARMENING CITY MANAGER ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4e) Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Page 7 7 MIKE HARCEY CHIEF OF POLICE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4e) Title: Memo of Understanding - 2021 Presidential Inauguration Page 8 Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4f Executive summary Title: Statutory tort limits f or liability insurance Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to adopt Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance . Policy consideration: Not applicable Summary: Each year the council is required to pass a resolution indicating if they wish to waive or not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability insurance established by Minnesota Statute 466.04. The statutory liability limits for claims that occur after July 1, 2009 are $500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence. The city council must review and make an election of one of the following three options: •Not to waive the statutory tort limits (staff recommendation) •Waive the limits and not purchase excess liability coverage. •Waive the limits and purchase excess liability coverage The three options are explained in more detail in the background section of this report. Financial or budget considerations: The city will continue to maintain liability insurance coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust in the amount required by State Statute, and the required annual motion will be in place in preparation for the new policy year. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Melanie Lammers, chief financial officer Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4f ) Page 2 Title: Statutory tort limits for liability insurance Discussion Background: The three options the city council has are detailed below. The city’s practice has been option 1, to not waive the statutory tort limits. Staff recommends the council continue with this practice. Option 1 (recommended ) If the city elects not to waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $500,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence would be limited to $1,500,000. Option 2 If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $2,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $2,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. Option 3 If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants. The City of St. Louis Park in the past has elected to not waive the statutory tort limits and has not purchased excess liability coverage. Staff recommends continuing this practice and not to waive the statutory limits. The following resolution allows the statutory tort limits to remain in place until the council changes this election. Staff will ask council to consider this question annually as required by the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4f ) Page 3 Title: Statutory tort limits for liability insurance Resolution No. 20-____ Resolution electing not to waive the statutory tort limits for liability insurance Whereas, pursuant to previous action taken, the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust has requested the City to make an election with regard to waiving or not waiving its tort liability established by Minnesota Statute 466.04; and Whereas, the choices available are to not waive the statutory limit, to waive the limit but to keep insurance coverage at the statutory limit, or to waive the limit and to add additional insurance coverage; Now therefore be it resolved that the St. Louis Park City Council does hereby elect not to waive the statutory tort liability limit established by Minnesota Statute 466.04 and that such election is effective until amended by further resolution of the St. Louis Park City Council. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4g Executive summary Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau Re commended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to approve the amended and restated agreement between the City of St. Louis Park and the St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau dba Discover St. Louis Park. Policy consideration: Is a grant from the city to the St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau reimbursable with CARES Act funding? Summary: On June 22, 2020, the City of St. Louis Park provided an emergency loan to the St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau (“Discover St. Louis Park”) to pay a portion of the organization’s operating costs due to a severe reduction in lodging tax revenue resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. In order for these dollars to be reimbursed with CARES Act funding the loan needs to be converted to a grant. Financial or budget considerations: The $35,000 loan was not a budgeted expense. The federal CARES Act funding will reimburse the city for the monies provided to Discover St. Louis Park if designated as a grant (not loan). Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Discussion Amended and restated agreement Prepared by: Melanie Lammers, chief financial officer Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 2 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau Discussion Background: The City of St. Louis Park was awarded approximately $3.6 million of federal CARES Act monies by the State of Minnesota. The monies are to be used for mitigating economic hardship caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Before the award of the CARES Act funding, the nonprofit corporation Discover St. Louis Park reached out to the city for financial assistance as its revenue sources had been decimated due to the outbreak. The city agreed to provide assistance to Discover St. Louis Park in the form of a loan in the amount of $35,000. Present considerations: With the award of the CARES A ct monies to the city, the loan between the city and Discover St. Louis Park was reviewed. It was subsequently determined necessary and desirable to allocate a portion of the city’s CARES Act funding for the CVB’s operating expenditures. The CARES Act allows that f unds may be used for grants to small businesses, including organizations such as Discover St. Louis Park, to reimburse the costs of business interruption caused by required closures and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. Accordingly, the parties need to amend and restate the previous Loan Agreement between the city and Discover St. Louis Park . Staff recommends changing this from a loan to grant in order for this use of funds to be eligible for CARES Act funding. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 3 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT This Amended and Restated Agreement (“Agreement”) is made this __ day of September, 2020, between St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau DBA Discover St. Louis Park, a Minnesota nonprofit corporation ("DSLP") and the City of St. Louis Park, a Minnesota municipal corporation (the “City”). RECITALS A.The City previously agreed to make a loan to DSLP of a portion of the accumulated City Share of Lodging Tax revenues in the amount of $35,000 (the “Loan”) to pay a portion of DSLP’s ongoing operating costs (“Operating Costs”) in order to prevent failure of DSLP’s business, and the parties entered into a Loan Agreement dated as of June 22, 2020 (the “Loan Agreement”) memorializing the Loan. All capitalized terms herein shall have the meanings defined in the Loan Agreement unless the context requires otherwise. B.Subsequent to execution of the Loan Agreement and disbursement of the Loan, the City received Coronavirus Relief Funds (“Funds”) from the State of Minnesota (the “State”), as authorized by Congress pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), which Funds may be used for grants to small businesses to reimburse the costs of business interruption caused by required closures and other impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. C.The City has determined that it is necessary and desirable to use a portion of the Funds to convert the Loan into a grant to DSLP to pay a portion of the Operating Costs, subject to the requirements of the CARES Act, and to amend and restate the Loan Agreement as provided herein. ACCORDINGLY, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1.The Grant Amount. Subject to and upon the terms and conditions of this Agreement, City agrees that the Loan previously disbursed to DSLP in the amount of Thirty-Five Thousand and no/100ths Dollars ($35,000) is hereby declared and determined to constitute a grant (“Grant”) of Funds pursuant to the CARES Act. Proceeds of the Grant shall be spent by DSLP in accordance with the requirements of the CARES Act and of Section 2 hereof. 2.Qualified Expenditures. Pursuant to the CARES Act and U.S. Treasury regulations in connection therewith, proceeds of the Grant may be used for costs arising from business interruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, including current payroll obligations, lease or mortgage payments, utilities, accounts payable, and other critical business expenses that can’t be paid as a direct result of the current health emergency. No later than November 1, 2020, DSLP agrees to provide to the City an accounting of actual Operating Costs paid with proceeds of the Grant and meeting these criteria. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 4 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau 3. Representations and Warranties. DSLP represents and warrants to the City that: (a) DSLP is a nonprofit corporation duly authorized and empowered to execute, deliver, and perform this Agreement. (b) The execution and delivery of this Agreement, and the performance by DSLP of its obligations hereunder, do not and will not violate or conflict with any provision of law and do not and will not violate or conflict with, or cause any default or event of default to occur under, any agreement binding upon DSLP. (c) The execution and delivery of this Agreement has been duly approved by all necessary action of DSLP, and this Agreement has in fact been duly executed and delivered by DSLP and constitutes its lawful and binding obligation, legally enforceable against it. (d) DSLP warrants that it shall keep and maintain books, records, and other documents relating directly to the receipt and disbursements of Grant proceeds and that any duly authorized representative of City shall, at all reasonable times, have access to and the right to inspe ct, copy, audit, and examine all such books, records, and other documents of DSLP pertaining to the Grant until the completion of all procedures necessary to provide a full accounting of CARES Act Funds disbursed by the City. (e) DSLP warrants that it has fully complied with all applicable state and federal laws pertaining to its business and will continue to comply throughout the terms of this Agreement. If at any time DSLP receives notice of noncompliance from any governmental entity, DSLP agrees to take any necessary action to comply with the state or federal law in question. (f) DSLP warrants that it will use the proceeds of the Grant made by City solely for the Operating Costs. 4. No Business Subsidy. The parties hereto agree and acknowledge that the Grant does not constitute a business subsidy under Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 to 116J.995, as amended, because the assistance is less than $150,000. 5. Event of Default by DSLP. The following shall be Events of Default under this Agreement: (a) failure to expend proceeds of the Grant for costs qualified under the CARES Act for business interruption, as described in Section 2 hereof; (b) any representation or warranty made by DSLP herein or in any document, instrument, or certificate given in connection with this Agreement is false when made; (c) any breach or failure of DSLP to perform any other term or condition of this Agreement not specifically described as an Event of Default in this Agreement and such breach or failure continues for a period of fifteen (15) days after the City has given written notice to DSLP specifying such default or breach, unless the City agrees in writing to an City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 5 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau extension of such time prior to its expiration; provided, however, if the failure stated in the notice cannot be corrected within the applicable period, the City will not unreasonably withhold its consent to an extension of such time if corrective action is instituted by DSLP within the applicable period and is being diligently pursued until the Default is corrected, but no such extension shall be given for an Event of Default that can be cured by the payment of money (i.e., payment of taxes, insurance premiums, or other amounts required to be paid hereunder); or (d) any breach by DSLP of any other agreement between DSLP and the City. 6. City's Remedies upon DSLP's Default. Upon an Event of Default by DSLP and after provision by the City of written notice, the City shall have the right to exercise any or all of the following remedies (and any other rights and remedies available to it): (a) suspend its performance under this Agreement; (b) take any action provided for at law to enforce compliance by DSLP with the terms of this Agreement. 7. City's Costs of Enforcement of Agreement. If an Event of Default has occurred as provided herein, then upon demand by City, DSLP shall pay or reimburse the City for all expenses, including all attorneys’ fees and expenses incurred by the City in connection with the enforcement of this Agreement, or in connection with the protection or enforcement of the interests of the City in any litigation or in any action or proceeding relating in any way to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. 8. Indemnification. (a) DSLP shall and does hereby agree to indemnify against and to hold City, and its officers, agents, and employees, harmless of and from any and all liability, loss, or damage that it may incur under or by reason of this Agreement, and of and from any and all claims and demands whatsoever that may be asserted against the City by reason of any alleged obligations or undertakings on its part to perform or discharge any of the terms, covenants, or agreements contained herein. (b) Should the City, or its officers, agents, or employees incur any such liability or be required to defend against any claims or demands pursuant to this Section, or should a judgment be entered against the City, including costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees, DSLP shall reimburse the City for the same immediately upon demand. (c) This indemnification and hold harmless provision shall survive the execution, delivery, and performance of this Agreement and the creation and payment of any indebtedness to the City. DSLP waives notice of the acceptance of this Agreement by the City. (d) Nothing in this Agreement shall constitute a waiver of or limitation on any immunity from or limitation on liability to which DSLP is entitled under law. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 6 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau 9. Miscellaneous. (a) Waiver. The performance or observance of any promise or condition set forth in this Agreement may be waived, amended, or modified only by a writing signed by DSLP and the City. No delay in the exercise of any power, right, or remedy operates as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of any other power, right, or remedy. (b) Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by either party. (c) Governing Law. This Agreement is made and shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the state of Minnesota. Any disputes, controversies, or claims arising out of this Agreement shall be heard in the state or federal courts of Minnesota, and all parties to this Agreement waive any objection to the jurisdiction of these courts, whether based on conv enience or otherwise. (d) Severability . If any provision or application of this Agreement is held unlawful or unenforceable in any respect, such illegality or unenforceability shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect, and this Agreement shall be construed as if the unlawful or unenforceable provision or application had never been contained herein or prescribed hereby. (e) Notice . All notices required hereunder shall be given by depositing in the U.S. mail, p ostage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following addresses (or such other addresses as either party may notify the other): To City: City of St. Louis Park 5005 Minnetonka Avenue St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Attn: City Manager To DSLP: St. Louis Park Convention and Visitors Bureau 1660 Highway 100 South Suite 501 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Attn: President (f) Termination . Upon a final accounting of CARES Act Funds disbursement by the City and acceptance of the same by the State, this Agreement shall terminate and neither party shall have any further obligation to the other. (g) Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the complete and exclusive statement of all mutual understandings between the parties with respect to this Agreement, superseding all prior or contemporaneous proposals, communications, and understandings, whether oral or written, concerning the Grant, including without limitation the Loan Agreement. The Note given by DSLP to the City pursuant to the Loan Agreement is hereby terminated and all principal and interest thereof are forgiven. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 7 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau (h) Headings. The headings appearing at the beginning of the several sections contained in this Agreement have been inserted for identification and reference purposes only and shall not be used in the construction and interpretation of this Agreement. (The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.) City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 8 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly executed and delivered by the proper officers thereunto duly authorized on the day and year first written above. CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK By: _________________________________ Thomas K. Harmening City Manager SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT – CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4g) Page 9 Title: Amended and restated agreement with SLP Convention and Visitors Bureau ST. LOUIS PARK CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU DBA DISCOVER ST. LOUIS PARK By: _________________________________ Title: _______________________________ SIGNATURE PAGE TO AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT – ST. LOUIS PARK CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU DBA DISCOVER ST. LOUIS PARK Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4h Executive summary Title: Authorization of expenditure of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and the St. Louis Park EDA Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as Time Sensitive** •Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing expenditures of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to authorize expenditure of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (EDA) to mitigate economic hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic? Summary: The city of St. Louis Park was awarded approximately $3.6 million of federal CARES Act monies by the State of Minnesota. The monies are to be used for mitigating economic hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. As the EDA is a separate entity with the city, attorneys recommend that the council authorize transfer of the CARES act funding to the EDA. The EDA has incurred expenses which are eligible for reimbursement under the CARES Act and for which it seeks reimbursement. The proposed resolution authorizes the transfer of CARES Act funding by the city to the EDA for eligible and authorized purposes under the CARES Act. Financial or budget considerations: None of the above were budgeted expenditures. The CARES Act funding will reimburse the EDA for eligible and authorized expenditures in accordance with CARES Act requirements. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development. Supporting documents: Discussion Resolution Prepared by: Melanie Lammers, chief financial officer Reviewed by: Karen Barton, community development director Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4h ) Page 2 Title: Authorization of expenditure of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and the St. Louis Park EDA Discussion Background: The City of St. Louis Park was awarded approximately $3.6 million of federal CARES A ct monies by the State of Minnesota. The monies are to be used for mitigating economic hardships caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The following three rules are to be applied to any expenditures to determine if they are eligible for reimbursement under the CARES Act. 1.Necessary expenditures due to the public health emergency with respect to COVID-19. An expenditure is reasonably necessary for its intended use in the reasonable judgement of the government officials responsible for spending Coronavirus Relief Fund payments. Expenditures must be used for actions taken to respond to the public health emergency, including expenditures incurred to respond directly to the emergency, as well as expenditures incurred to respond to second order effects, such as by providing economic support to those suffering from employment or business interruptions due to COVID-19-related business closures. 2.Costs not accounted for in the city’s budget most recently approved as of March 27, 2020. 3.Performance of delivery must occur during the covered period, and payment of funds must be made during that time. For cities, the covered period is March 1, 2020, to Nov. 15, 2020. Present considerations: The EDA has incurred expenses which are eligible for reimbursement under the CARES Act and for which it seeks reimbursement. The proposed resolution authorizes the transfer of the CARES Act funding by the City of St. Louis Park to the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (EDA). The funds transferred to the EDA are authorized for the following: •Assistance to STEP for housing rental assistance in the amount of $108,000. •Assistance to Discover St. Louis Park in the amount of $35,000 to offset certain costs of business interruption. •Establishment of the Small Business Grant Assistance Program to financially assist small businesses in the city that were directly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic in the amount of $224,000. •Partnership with Hennepin County’s Small Business Relief Fund to provide additional grants to St. Louis Park small businesses directly impacted by COVID-19 in the amount of $200,000. Next steps: Upon adoption of the proposed resolution , the EDA may be reimbursed for the above previously incurred expenditures as well as to make grant payments to local small businesses in conjunction with the joint city/county Small Business Relief Fund program. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4h ) Page 3 Title: Authorization of expenditure of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and the St. Louis Park EDA Resolution No. 20-____ Resolution authorizing expenditure of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and by the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park (“city”) has received Coronavirus Relief Funds (“Funds”) from the State of Minnesota, as authorized by Congress pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”); and Whereas, the CARES Act authorizes the city to transfer all or a portion of the Funds to other units of government; and Whereas, the CARES Act authorizes Funds to be used for grants to small businesse s to reimburse the costs of business interruption caused by required closures, as well as to renters and homeowners to prevent eviction or foreclosure due to financial hardship; and Whereas, the city previously provided assistance to STEP in the amount of $108,000 from the city’s housing rehabilitation fund for rental assistance to help prevent housing instability, and provided assistance to Discover St. Louis Park in the amount of $35,000 from the city’s lodging tax fund to offset certain costs of business interruption; and Whereas, the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority (the “authority”) previously established its Small Business Emergency Grant Assistance Program (the “Busine ss Program”), the purpose of which was to assist small businesses in the city that have been directly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and provided grants in the aggregate total amount of $224,000 from its development fund for such purpose; and Whereas, each of the expenditures described herein was necessary in connection with the public health emergency caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, was incurred on or after March 1, 2020, and was not accounted for in the City’s regular budget in place as of March 27, 2020, and therefore is a permissible expenditure of Funds under the CARES Act; and Whereas, the city council has determined that (a) allocating a portion of the Funds to reimburse the city and authority for prior expenditures meeting the requirements of the CARES Act as described above, and (b) transferring the administration of a portion of the Funds to the authority for additional business assistance purposes, are in the best interests of the city and that the Funds designated for such uses will comply with federal and state guidelines for the use of the Funds under the CARES Act. Now, therefore, it is resolved that the city authorizes the allocation of (a) $108,000 of Funds to the city’s housing rehabilitation fund, to reimburse the city for its prior assistance to STEP for the purpose of providing rental assistance to city residents to prevent housing instability; and (b) $35,000 to the city’s lodging tax fund, to reimburse the city for its prior assistance to Discover St. Louis Park in connection with business interruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 4h ) Page 4 Title: Authorization of expenditure of Coronavirus Relief Funds by the city and the St. Louis Park EDA It is further resolved that the city manager and staff are authorized and directed to transfer the administration of a portion of the Funds to the authority, in the following amounts and for the following purposes: (a) the amount of $224,000, for the purpose of reimbursing the authority’s development fund for qualified grants previously provided to small businesses through the Business Program, and (b) the amount of $200,000 to provide additional grants to small businesses located in the city through a partnership with Hennepin County, all in accordance with federal and state guidelines for expending the Funds. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Consent agenda item: 4i Executive summary Title: Accept funding from Hennepin County “Save the Summer” grant program Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as Time Sensitive** • Motion to adopt Resolution approving acceptance of grant funding from the Hennepin County “Save the Summer” grant program in the amount of $44,466 to help with funding for Westwood Hills Nature Center and playground summer camps, youth sports leagues, Park At Home activity packs and the Aquatic Center season opening. Policy consideration: Does the City Council wish to accept funding from the grant? Summary: Due to concerns that many local and regional summer day camps and programs have been cancelled due to the pandemic, Hennepin County approved an initial $1 million of federal pandemic funding dedicated to getting youth outdoors this summer. The Operations and Recreation department applied for and was approved to receive funding for Westwood Hills Nature Center day camps, playground camps, youth sport leagues, Park at Home activity packs and the Aquatic Park season opening. The funding can be used for administrative overhead, hiring seasonal staff, buying needed equipment and PPE, transportation and other creative ideas to help get kids outdoor this summer as well as fall programming. The Three Rivers Park District has agreed to be the fiscal agent for this grant. Financial or budget considerations: This funding will be used to offset expenses incurred to administer recreational programming during the summer and fall as a result of COVID-19. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement. Supporting documents: Resolution Prepared by: Kori Shingles , recreation and facilities supervisor Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, director of operations and recreation Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of (Item No. 4i) Page 2 Title: Accept funding from Hennepin County “Save the Summer” grant program Resolution No. 20-____ Resolution approving acceptance of grant funding from the Hennepin County “Save the Summer” grant program in the amount of $44,466 Whereas, Hennepin County, via the Hennepin County “Save the Summer” Program, provides funds to assist local and regional government units of Hennepin County with the creation of youth summer programs in the time of COVID-19; and Where as, The Three Rivers Park District as agreed to be the fiscal agent for these grant funds for cities in Hennepin County; and Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park must accept the approved grant funding for approved programs relating to COVID 19; and Whereas, the Hennepin County “Save the Summer” grant program will reimburse all related costs to the approved program proposals, in an amount not to exceed $44,466, for the city’s Westwood Hills Nature Cent er summer camps, summer playground program, youth sport leagues, Park at Home activity packs and Aquatic Center, fall programming; and Now therefore be it resolved by the City of St. Louis Park City Council that the grant funding is hereby accepted with thanks to the Hennepin County “Save the Summer” grant program with the understanding that the funding must be used for approved program proposal expenses incurred between May and December 2020. Reviewed for Administration Adopted by the City Council September 8, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Public hearing: 6a Executive summary Title: Request to vacate portions of unused utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Mayor to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then close the public hearing. Motion to approve First Reading of Ordinance vacating portions of utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard and set the Second Reading of an Ordinance for September 21, 2020. (Requires five affirmative votes.) Policy consideration: Are the utility easements needed for public purposes? Summary: The city received a petition from Texa Tonka Bowling Alley, LLC to vacate portions of utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard, also known as the Texa-Tonka Lanes. The ten- foot-wide utility easement run s north to south through the site, underneath the building. The easement, which was originally recorded in 1951, has never been used. Additionally, in 1958, the Hennepin County District Court decided that this easement did not apply to the lot, though the easement is still showing up in the property’s title documentation. The applicant requests to vacate the utility easement in order to clean up the title to the property. The portions of easements to be vacated are not needed by the city, county, or public utility companies for any public purpose. The ordinance requires an affirmative vote of at least five councilmembers. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Draft ordinance Prepared by: Jennifer Monson, senior planner Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor Karen Barton, community development director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 6 a) Page 2 Title: Request to vacate portions of unused utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard Ordinance No. ____-20 An ordinance vacating portions of utility easements 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard The City of St. Louis Park does ordain: Whereas, certain easements contained in the plat of Texa-Tonka Addition have been adjudicated to not affect certain property within Block 2, Texa-Tonka Addition as evidenced in Findings of Fact and Order dated September 30, 1954, filed September 30, 1954, as Document No. 436715 (Block 2), and in Findings and Order dated July 9, 1958, filed July 11, 1958, as Document No. 562866 (Block 4) Section 1. The petition to vacate the utility easements was initiated by Texa Tonka Bowling Alley LLC . The notice of said petition has been published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on August 17, 2020 and the City Council has conducted a public hearing upon said petition and has determined that the easements are not needed for public purposes, and that it is for the best interest of the public that said easements be vacated. Section 2. The following described easements as now dedicated and laid out within the corporate limits of the City of St. Louis Park and shown in Attachment A, are vacated: That particular utility easement as shown on the plat of Texa-Tonka Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota located upon the west 10.00 feet of Lots 24, 25, 26, 27 and 28, Block 4, said Texa-Tonka Addition. Section 3. The City Clerk is instructed to record certified copies of this ordinance in the Office of the Hennepin County Register of Deeds or Registrar of Titles as the case may be. Section 4. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council September 21, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Approved as to form and execution: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney First reading September 8, 2020 Second reading September 21, 2020 Date of publication October 1, 2020 Date ordinance takes effect October 16, 2020 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 6 a) Page 3 Title: Request to vacate portions of unused utility easements at 8200 Minnetonka Boulevard Attachment A Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Action agenda item: 8a Executive summary Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** •Motion to designate Redstone Construction, LLC the lowest responsible bidder and authorize a contract with the firm in the amount of $7,340,684.26 for Dakota -Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000. •Motion to approve the construction administration services contract with SRF Consulting Group, Inc in the amount of $836,973. Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to continue to pursue the bikeway improvements identified in this report? Summary: The bid tabulation for the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge project was presented at the Aug. 17, 2020 council meeting. The overall project cost exceeded the estimates presented to council on March 16, 2020. During this meeting there were numerous questions asked by the council that required additional time for staff to compile the answers. In addition, council asked to submit questions after the meeting. The discussion section of this report outline s additional information related to the questions provided by council. Due to additional information and clarification requested by council, the matter was tabled for discussion to be held at a future date. The contract language required the city to act on the bid within 33 days of the bid opening. Redstone Construction, LLC was agreeable to extending their low bid until the week of Sept. 7 to allow staff and council time to address the outstanding questions. Financial or budget considerations: Th is proj ect is included in the city’s Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2020 and 2021. General Obligation bonds, Storm Sewer funds and federal funds are expected to be used to fund this project. Additional information on the breakdown of the funding can be found later in this report. Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably. Supporting documents: Discussion Aug. 10, 2020 study session report Aug. 17, 2020 council report 2020 Market value overview report Property type table and 5-year tracking history Tax by property class no FD Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, senior engineering project manager Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 2 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Discussion Background: Council approved the final plans and specifications and authorized bidding documents for the Dakota-Edgew ood Trail bridge on March 16, 2020. An advertisement for bids was published in the St. Louis Park Sun Sailor on July 2, 2020 and July 9, 2020, and in Finance and Commerce on July 2 through July 15, 2020. Email notification was provided to four (4) minority associations, and final printed plans were available for viewing at City Hall. In addition, plans and specifications were made available electronically via the internet on the city’s eGram website. Bids for the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge were opened on July 28, 2020. S ixty -four (64) contractors/vendors obtained plan sets, including ten (10) Disadvantage d Business Enterprises (DBE). Since federal funding is included in this project, the Minnesota Department of Human Rights has set a minimum goal of 14.4% DBE for this project. Seven contractors bid on the project. Project description: The Dakota-Edgewood Trail bridge segment is a partially federally funded project from Cedar Lake Road to 26th Street that includes: •A multi-use trail along the east side o f Edgewood Avenue between Cedar Lake Road and the BNSF railroad right of way. •A pedestrian and bicycle bridge over the BNSF Railroad connecting Edgewood Avenue and Dakota Park and ending at the corner of 26th Street and Dakota Avenue. F inancial considerations: Bids for the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge were opened on July 28, 2020. Seven contractors bid on the project. The low bid was submitted by Redstone Construction, LLC in the amount of $7,340,684.26. The low bid was under the revised engineer’s estimate but above the estimate given to council in March. The following tables provide additional detail on bidding and the expected project costs. Table 1 Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge Bids Contractor Bid Difference Percent change Redstone Construction, LLC $7,340,684.26 ($252,147.60) -3.3% Engineer’s Estimate (June 26, 2020) $7,592,831.86 $0.00 0.0% Kraemer North America, LLC $8,239,003.59 $646,171.73 8.5% S.M. Hentges & Sons, Inc $8,331,369.95 $738,538.09 9.7% Ames Construction Inc. $8,522,251.05 $929,419.19 12.2% Zenith Tech, Inc. $8,522,520.00 $929,688.14 12.2% C. S. McCrossan Construction, Inc $8,797,011.45 $1,204,179.59 15.9% Meyer Construction Inc. $9,259,713.70 $1,666,881.84 22.0% City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 3 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 The following table compares project costs presented at council on March 16, 2020 and the low bids received on July 28, 2020. Project costs include construction costs and all other costs for the project. Table 2 has the following changes since the August 17 report: • The cost for art has been removed but is still included in the project. • The construction cost shown in the March 16 council report column has been increased to include the pre -bid contingency ($6,653,256 + $334,825). This equates to a construction cost of $6,988,081. Likewise , for comparison purposes, the actual construction bid of $7,340,684.26 has been increased by 5% to include a contingency ($7,340,682 + $367,034). This equates to a current construction cost estimate of $7,707,718. Table 2 Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge 163-90-003 Council Report March 16, 2020 Low Bid Difference Percent change ROW/Land $275,000.00 $270,871.00 ($4,129.00) -2% Construction $6,988,081.00 $7,707,718.00 $719,637.00 5% Preliminary Eng. $712,000.00 $790,161.43 $78,161.43 11% Construction Eng. $962,126.00 $845,677.00 ($116,449.00) -12% Tree replacement $135,000.00 $135,000.00 $0.00 0% Utility Relocates $70,000.00 $92,408.06 $22,408.06 32% Total $9,142,207.00 $9,841,835.00 $699,628.00 7.7% The following table compares funding sources presented to council on March 16, 2020 and the low bids received on July 28, 2020. During the study session and the council meeting, there was a desire to find alternative funding sources to reduce the amount needed from GO bonds. Therefore, the storm water utility is recommended to be used to fund the storm sewer portion of the project. Table 3 Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge 163-90-003 Funding sources Council report March 16, 2020 Low bid July 28, 2020 Difference Bridge and bikeways (GO bonds) $6,223,807.00 $6,604,935.96 $381,128.96 Storm water utility $0.00 $318,500.00 $318,500.00 Federal Aid * $2,918,400.00 $2,918,400.00 $0.00 Total $9,142,207.00 $9,841,835.96 $699,628.00 *The federal funds are capped, so if there is additional construction cost, t hey will be paid using local funds. As discussed previously, the art incorporated into this project is estimated to cost $80,000 and will be paid for using the administrative dollars the city retains from the lodging tax. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 4 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Additional contract for construction administration: The city has engaged SRF Consulting Group, Inc. to provide in-construction services for the project. The contract amount is $836,973 and is included in the project costs shown in the tables above. City staff are not qualified to complete the inspection of the bridge or the testing and oversight of the contaminated soils. In addition, a federally funded project has numerous additional requirements that are not typical on our local projects. Therefore, having a firm well versed in the obligations of the federal funding will help in the reimbursement of those funds. Debt service The Dakota-Edgewood trail bridge is our largest project requiring General Obligation debt for 2020. We can issue debt for this project over a 10 or 15-year period. The debt will impact our future levy starting in the year 2022. We will need to increase our levy by the amount bolded depending upon the number of years we take the debt out for. Here is a table showing the levy impact for all the projects starting or currently underway. (N ote: This table still needs to be refined slightly but still provides a good snapshot of impacts.) Table 4 Project Total bond amount Average levy amount per year (10 year) Average levy amount per year (15 ye ar) Dakota-Edgewood Bridge $6,465,000 $724,000 $515,000 Dakota Bikeway $758,500 $88,000 $63,000 Southeast Bikeway $485,000 $55,000 $40,000 Walker-Lake Street and Pavement Management bikeway and sidewalks * $960,000 $110,000 $77,000 SWLRT Regional Trail bridge* $580,000 $65,000 $47,000 Totals $9,248,500.00 $1,042,000.00 $742,000.00 *project under construction Average levy amount per year (10 year): Levy needed starting in 2022, continuing for 10 years Average levy amount per year (15 year): Levy needed starting in 2022, continuing for 15 years As an alternate to a 15-year debt term, we could leave all projects on a 10-year debt schedule with the exception of the bridge , which could be bonded for 20 years. This would create a debt levy need of $732,000 in 2022 or about a 2% debt levy increase with a faster payoff for all other projects in 2020. There may be other ways to structure the repayment of the debt to ease the impacts on taxpayers. Follow up from Aug. 17, 2020 council meeting: Information regarding this project was shared with the city council in a written report at the Aug. 10 study session and during the council meeting on Aug. 17. The study session and council reports are attached. During the Aug. 17 meeting council members had additional inquiries and requested follow up questions be included in this report. The following is a summary of the questions asked during the council meeting and those submitted to staff by council. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 5 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Questions related to project costs 1. How much money has been expended on this project and to what has the money been spent on? • The total expenditures for both the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge and Dakota Avenue bikeway project is $1,309,026 o $67,500 has been spent on engineering for the Dakota Avenue bikeway. o $1,241,526 has been spent on t he Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge based on the following breakdown: i. Trees = $36,357 ii. Right of way = $270,871 1. Permanent right of way/easements: $225,171. Do not expire. 2. Temporary easements: $45,700. Set to expire in 2021. iii. Engineering = $841,890 iv. Utility relocation = $92,408 2. Will the $1,309,026 spent to date be bonded for, whether the bridge is built? • The funding source for these costs is GO bonds and will need to be bonded for regardless of the construction of the bridge . 3. Is it typical for us to purchase permanent and/or temporary right of way/easements prior to bids being approved and/or contracts being signed? • G iven the amount of time it takes to obtain easements, staff begins the acquisition of easements once council authorizes the design of final plans. The process to acquire easements typically takes 6 months to a year. Obtaining them before the bid award eliminates some of the uncertainty for the overall project cost and project schedule. Additionally, f or projects with federal dollars , the project needs to demonstrate all necessary easements are acquired prior to getting MnDOT’s auth orization to bid the project. 4. Why is the contingency included in the March totals then credited toward the August total to reduce the overall difference? Why was that done? • The engineer’s estimate includes a contingency throughout the design process to account for final design changes and uncertainty in the bidding climate. Staff usually does not call it out as a separate line item in our report tables. However, it was a separate line item in the March 16 meeting report. To be consistent, we kept it in the Aug. 17 report. However, as noted is Table 2, to provide a clearer comparison, the 5% contingency has now been added to the current low bid and total project cost. 5. Where did the $7.592M engineer estimate come from? On March 16 it was $6.653M? • As the project moved toward 100% design plans, we began to see considerable changes in the way contractors were bidding projects such as higher prices for raw materials such as concrete, the way contractors were viewing this project in particular and refinements to the final design plan set. We work with contractors early on to understand how they view this type of project, but they also don’t have the full picture of the challenges of the project until they sit down and begin to really review the plans to submit bids. As we approached bidding the plan set out in late City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 6 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 June, we heard a lot more concern from contractors regarding the complexity of working in a tight area and adjacent/over the BNSF railroad. We translated their concern into an increase in the cost to mobilize/work adjacent to the railroad by over $400,000. The amount we estimated in the engineer’s estimate was realized in the bids we received. • A contingency of $334,000 was a separate line item in March , so the actual construction estimate in March was $6,988,081.00. • Overall, the incre ase from March to July was a result of better refinement to the plans and f eedback from contractors on how they viewed projects as summer workloads and unit prices unfolded. 6. How has road and bridge construction costs increased over the past 5 years? • Project cost increase s are dependent on type of construction. This project has both bridges (concrete and steel) and trail construction. • The design for the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge project includes two primary structure types, concrete slab and steel truss. Both have increased in average cost per square foot from 2012 – 2019 based on projects let through MnDOT. o Concrete slab structures have increased 15.7 % o Steel truss structures have increased 83.1% • Trail costs have increased an average of 50% since 2012 and 29% in the last 5 years. 7. How committed is the federal money and what are the guidelines or deadlines around it? • The federal funding has timelines and sunset dates in order to receive the funding. The timelines we are working under are as follows: o Project approved by MnDOT (who oversees the federal dollars) by June 2020. o Contract with contractor must be approved by MnDOT and the city within 9 months (March 2021). If the city was to reject the bids, new bids would need to be approved by MnDOT and city by March 2021 or the city would have to forfeit the $2.91 million of federal funding. o Maximum period from MnDOT approval of contract to end of construction is 5 years (March 2026) 8. Could the city choose to not accept the federal funds and the city reapply for funds in the future? • The city could choose to not accept the federal funds at this time . The $2.91 million would be distributed to other projects from the 2016 federal solicitation application. The next time to submit for the federal solicitation would be in 2022 for funding in 2026 or 2027. The federal solicitation process is competitive, and funding is not guaranteed. • If this were to happen, the plan set would be shelved for potential construction at a later date. If we were successful in obtaining funds later, the plans would require work to bring them to current year standards. In addition, a new environmental review would have to be conducted and temporary construction easements would need to be reacquired. Staff has not estimated the se costs. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 7 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Questions related to connectivity created by the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge 9. Ho w many miles of bike trails and bike lanes exist in the city? How many more miles are proposed to be built? • Existing bike trails and bike ways: o Existing miles of bike trails = 36.5 miles o New bike trails constructed with Connect the Park =3.2 miles . For a total of 39.7 miles in the city . o Bikeways constructed with Connect the Park (as of end of 2020) = 18.9 miles • Proposed bike trails and bike ways: o Proposed trails with Connect the Park= 1.5 miles o Proposed bikeways with Connect the Park = 16.8 miles 10. What routes/areas this would the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge connect? • The Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge provides a direct connection for the neighborhoods south of the tracks to: o The West end (restaurants, employment, grocery, shopping, movies and other services), Metro transit bus service that runs along Cedar Lake Road (route 9) and the JCC. • The Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge provides a direct connection for the neighborhoods north of the tracks to: o Restaurants (i.e. Parkway Pizza, etc), Metro transit bus service along Minnetonka Boulevard (Route 17 and 667), Historic Walker Lake area (restaurants, commercial and services), the high school, the North Cedar Lake Regional trail and Wooddale SWLRT station. o In addition, once the Louisiana bikeway, Monterey bikeway, and 36th Street bikeways are built (2020, 2021 and 2022 respectively) this bridge will also provide connections to: Methodist Hospital, commercial and other services along Excelsior, the post office, Target, Byerly’s. 11. On the Bicycle Network Analysis (BNA) study - is the before and after of the study based on all of the bikeways included in Connect the Park and not just the Dakota bridge? Is there more information on the study? • The BNA study/tool: The after map assumes all bikeways included in the CIP are implemented. There is not a specific written study that accompanies the maps. This tool uses GIS (Geographic information system software) to complete the spatial data analysis and associated bicycle routing. The results are the two maps that we provided to the city council with the report. Toole Design indicated that the post implementation connectivity scores are the result of the planned facilities breaking down barriers to destinations. Specifically, the barrier that is the railroad at this locatio n. 12. How many students going to Peter Hobart would be able to walk to school with this bridge, that cannot today? • The following table is information provided by the school district regarding the number of students and their racial makeup that live north of the BNSF railroad and don’t have pedestrian or bicycle access to the Peter Hobart Elementary School and the St. Louis Park High School. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 8 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Table 5 Total school population Identified race African American Asian, Pacific Islander Caucasian Hispanic Native American Two or more races Peter Hobart School Overall school population 497 139 34 268 42 13 1 Blackstone Neighborhood 18 4 0 9 5 0 0 Cedarhurst Neighborhood 9 1 0 8 0 0 0 Eliot Neighborhood 88 21 11 47 6 3 0 Eliotview Neighborhood 18 3 1 13 1 0 0 Totals 133 29 12 77 12 3 0 Percent of total student population 27% 21% 35% 29% 29% 23% 0% SLP High School Overall school population 1511 424 77 802 182 24 2 Blackstone Neighborhood 5 0 0 3 2 0 0 Cedarhurst Neighborhood 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 Eliot Neighborhood 47 14 7 17 8 1 0 Eliotview Neighborhood 13 4 0 6 3 0 0 Totals 70 18 7 31 13 1 0 Percent of total student population 5% 4% 9% 4% 7% 4% 0% Questions related to public process 13. What public engagement has been done on this project? • Public engagement on this specific project began in September of 2018 and has continued up until December of 2019. The process outlined below does not include work done in years prior o n developing the Connect the Park implementation plan. o Sept. 26, 2018 — Open house 1 o Oct. 30, 2018 — Open house 2 o March 19, 2019 — Open house 3 o April 15, 2019 — Public hearing o May 6, 2019 — Council decision for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge o Council approval of project from Cedar Lake Road to Minnetonka Boulevard. The remaining portion of the project, Minnetonka Boulevard to Lake Street was postponed to November. o July 9, 2019 — Open house 4 o Sept. 19, 2019 - Open house 5 o Nov. 12, 2019 – Study session report o Nov. 18, 2019 – Public hearing o Dec. 2, 2019 – Council action for Dakota Avenue Bikeways City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 9 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Questions related to other bridge projects in our Connect the Park (CTP) plan 14. Are there other bridges considered in the CTP plan? • There is one more standalone bicycle /pedestrian bridge included in the Connect the Park implementation plan ; it is a connection across the BNSF at TH100. This is in the city capital improvement plan for construction in 2026. In 2012, the high -level construction cost estimate was $3.8 million . Applying the experience with the Dakota bridge, knowledge of the area’s soil conditions, and increases in bridge construction cost since 2012, staff would expect that a bridge at this location, in today’s dollars, would be similar to the Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge cost. 15. The Louisiana bikeway is scheduled to be done in 2024, with the part to the north slotted for 2023. If/when it is done, would it reduce the value of the Dakota bridge? • The construction of Louisiana bikeway will not reduce the value of the Dakota bridge but instead enhance the pedestrian/bicycle network by removing north south barriers in the community. • Staff believes that both Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge and improvements along Louisiana Avenue are both important projects to increase the network of half-mile spaced bikeways north and south through the community. • Dakota has several benefits over Louisiana Avenue : o It is a dedicated pedestrian/bicycle bridge. o The Dakota bikeway corridor has lower traffic volumes. o The Dakota corridor is centered in the community and has numerous community connection s such as schools, parks and the SWLRT Wo oddale Station. o Preliminary design for Louisiana Avenue has not yet begun and staff isn’t confident that a bike facility can be designed in this corridor to accommodate the “interested but concerned” bicyclist along the entire corridor. Questions related to property values in the city 16. What is the summary/average value of assessed home values for 2020 broken down by neighborhoods, specifically the v alues for the Blackstone, Cedarhurst, Eliot and Eliot View neighborhoods, along with information for the rest of the city's neighborhoods? • The city maintain s a five -year rolling breakdown for single -family homes, condos and townhomes. Th e attached report entitled “2020 Market Value Overview” (attachment 1) provides a complete city -wide picture on pp 8-10. The Blackstone neighborhood has the city’s lowest assessed median market value at $230,800, which is an extremely attractive price poin t. Blackstone, Ce darhurst, Eliot and Eliot View neighborhoods are among the lower-priced brackets locales in the community. With the exception of the Eliot neighborhood (510 single -family homes), each of these neighborhoods are on the smaller side . Blackstone has 95 homes; Cedarhurst has 48 homes and Eliot View has 165 homes. For reference , the city has approximately 11,580 single -family homes total. 17. Please provide a breakdown (dollar amount and percentages) of how much of our General Fund revenue for 2019 and 2020 comes from taxes on Residential housing, City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 10 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Apartments/Townhomes/Condominiums, and Commercial/Industrial properties, respectively. What is the total appraised values are for these categories of properties for those years? • Please see the attached report titled “Property Type Table and 5-year Tracking History ” (attachment 2) and “Tax by property class no FD” (attachment 3). It is a comparative tracking history of what we normally view as our peer cities. The primary takeaways are two-fold. o The 2020 assessment is broken down into the major sector categories and St. Louis Park has a far heavier emphasis on CIA stock (commercial-industrial- apartments), which carry the property tax burden to a much larger degree than many other cities (Bloomington, Minneapolis and G olden Valley are most similar). o St. Louis Park’s 5-year history of tax capacity growth has been robust on a comparative basis, which is clear evidence of a community actively and fully engaged in reinvestment, redevelopment and renewal. 18. Are there trends on the valuations of these types of properties for 2021, based upon sales for the first half of 2020? • There is an outline of the market response for assess 2021 (pay 2022), but it is simply too early to know the detailed route we are about to take. Th e property tax timeline is very lengthy and not built to reflect real-time events. For example, the market activity from 10-01-2018 through 09-30-2019 is the formal data set used to set the 2020 assessment, which serves as the foundation for the payable 2021 tax period calculations. So, when we are talking about real-time market performance, we are talking about the payable 2022 tax period and into the payable 2023 tax period. Further questions can be addressed by the city assessor. 19. What is the yearly summary of the current Long-Range Capital Plan bonding obligations for the next 10 years? Specifically , the total yearly obligations on bonds and what bond obligations are due to be paid off in the next 5 years. • Staff is working on a 10-year timeline of pro posed debt that will be presented at the Sept. 8 meeting. City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Page 11 Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Demographics of neighborhoods 20. What is the population and the racial make-up of the Blackstone, Cedarhurst, Eliot and Eliot View neighborhoods? What is the number of BIPOC (Black, Indigenous and People of Color) children reside in those neighborhoods? 2013- 2017 ACS 5-year estimates Census Tract 220 Census Tract 221.01 Census Tract 221.02 Neighborhoods: Blackstone and Cedarhurst Eliot and Eliot View Pennsylvania Park and Willow Park Total Population: 1,658 2,717 2,827 Median Household Income ($): 75,000 87,565 62,566 Median Age: 34.2 33.7 35.3 Population Under 5 (%): 2.17 4.67 6.37 Population 18-24 (%): 5.07 5.67 7.39 Population 65 and Over (%): 8.75 9.31 14.68 Persons Below Poverty Level (%): 2.90 4.64 10.52 Children Under 18 Living in Poverty (%): 0.00 8.13 13.72 Not High School Graduate (%): 2.98 3.22 5.80 Non-Hispanic, Black (%): 1.09 14.17 11.81 Non-Hispanic, White (%): 82.63 69.16 73.15 Hispanic (%): 6.39 3.46 9.76 American Indian or Alaska Native (%): 0.30 0.44 0.00 Asian (%): 3.92 8.87 3.18 Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (%): 0.00 0.00 0.57 Some Other Race (%): 0.00 2.58 0.00 Foreign Born (%): 8.26 18.18 9.94 No One in Household Age 14+ Speaks English "Very Well" (%): 0.70 6.57 3.89 Renter Occupied Housing Units (%): 42.53 43.55 41.77 Schedule and next steps: If approved, construction on the Dakota-Edgewood Bridge would start in late September 2020 and be completed by November 2021. The contractor would begin setting up the construction road, project fencing and other miscellaneous work this fall. Trees would be removed after Nov. 1 and bridge foundation work would begin in later November and December. Work would mostly be suspended during January and February of 2021. Construction would resume in March. 2020 Property Type Table - TMV & EMV (Prelim 2020-07-29) Parcel Counts BLOOMINGTON Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total Commercial Total: 1,362,919,500 2,657,630,100 0 4,020,549,600 80,074,735 559 603 1,162 Farm Total: 1,936,900 213,200 0 2,150,100 24,219 0 4 4 Industrial Total: 359,524,500 487,032,900 16.159.680 862,717,000 17,057,942 17 350 367 Residential Total: 3,170,141,700 4,971,252,700 0 8,141,394,400 78,791,552 242 28,703 28,945 Apartment Total: 233,143,600 1,418,387,300 0 1,651,530,900 19,795,017 5 377 382 Other Total: 1,702,000 964,000 0 2,666,000 26,660 0 172 172 Total: 5,129,368,200 9,535,480,200 16,159.600 14,681,008,000 195,770,125 823 30,209 31,032 Parcel Counts BROOKLYN PARK Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total Commercial Total: 235,672,500 408,882,200 0 644,554,700 12,706,199 165 294 459 Farm Total: 32,391,500 33,100 0 32,424,600 324,246 0 25 25 Industrial Total: 201,552,500 moo .an2.oo ams 915,937,500 18,169,823 9 243 252 Residential Total: 1,365,8 I 8,300 4,741,441,900 0 6, 107,260,200 58,157,580 465 23,255 23,720 Apartment Total: 94,552,800 583,484,400 0 678,037,200 8,165,706 2 82 84 Other Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 233 233 Total: 1,929,987,600 6,443,333,700 4,892,900 8,378,214,200 97,523,554 641 24,132 24,773 Parcel Counts EDEN PRAIRIE Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exemot Tax Total Commercial Total: 505,226,200 1,003,217,500 0 1,508,443,700 29,932,726 168 435 603 Farm Total: 4,794,400 558,800 0 5,353,200 46,904 0 34 34 Industrial Total: 241,629,100 s37,915,400 2o,92s.so0 800,473,000 15,878,080 40 260 300 Residential Total: 2,729,293,100 5,242,960,900 0 7,972,254,000 80,314,796 650 20,607 21,257 Apartment Total: 156,967,100 893,234, I 00 0 1,050,201,200 12,786,587 0 80 80 Other Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 508 508 Total: 3,637,909,900 7,677,886,700 20,928,500 11,336,725,100 138,959,093 858 21,924 22,782 Parcel Counts EDINA Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total 669,254,000 1,253,130,200 0 1,922,384,200 38,239,131 24 373 397 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 80,886,300 207,252,900 3868.300 291,187,500 5,777,250 12 119 131 4,281,648,700 5,609,041,800 0 9,890,690,500 105,256,228 521 20,082 20,603 281,846,500 912,134,400 0 1,193,980,900 14,547,036 0 118 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 Total: 5,313,635,500 7,981,559,300 3,048,300 13,298,243, I 00 163,81 9,645 557 20,787 21,344 Parcel Counts GOLDEN VALLEY Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total nercial Total: 331,132,000 463,013,000 0 794,145,000 15,780,400 114 171 285 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 trial Total: 142,042,500 20s.170,aoo ezo 353,375,900 6,977,538 21 210 231 ential Total: 1,009,011,300 1,732,745,000 0 2,741,756,300 27,264,628 176 7,970 8,146 mentTotal: 59,032,200 428,201,000 0 487,233,200 5,824,431 3 45 48 Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 36 Total: 1,541,218,000 2,829,129,800 6,162,600 4,376,510,400 55,846,997 314 8,432 8,746 Parcel Counts HOPKINS Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total - 90,165,000 260,470,000 0 350,635,000 6,896,275 121 201 322 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 67,641,700 133,384,000 0 201,025,700 3,959,429 19 131 150 430,906,300 757,967,000 0 1,188,873,300 11,717,401 75 4,527 4,602 72,379,000 524,966,000 0 597,345,000 7,269,579 4 93 97 986,000 599,000 0 1,585,000 18,770 0 49 49 Total: 662,078,000 1,677,386,000 o 2,339,464,000 29,861,454 219 5,001 5,220 Parcel Counts MAPLE GROVE Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exemot Tax Total Commercial Total: 420,684,900 748,374,000 0 1,169,058,900 23,108,628 266 442 708 Farm Total: 23,182,900 2,631,700 0 25,814,600 247,786 0 44 44 Industrial Total: 229,376,800 423,282,300 1s,00.soo 667,689,900 13,243,918 27 215 242 Residential Total: 1,766,406,100 6,5 I 8,933,700 0 8,285,339,800 81,524,028 512 24,963 25,475 Apartment Total: 68,845,200 4 I 3,182,000 0 482,027,200 5,734,876 2 39 41 Other Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 350 Total: 2,508,495,900 8,106,403,700 15,030,800 10,629,930,400 123,859,236 807 26,053 26,860 Parcel Counts MINNETONKA Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exemot Tax Total Commercial Total: 572,668, I 00 I, I 38,980,900 0 1,711,649,000 34,000,560 I51 373 524 Fann Total: 414,000 644,100 0 1,058,100 7,255 0 I I Industrial Total: 154,343,000 204,906,300 1337000 360,586,300 7,152,476 9 121 130 Residential Total: 3,047,358,000 4,411,475,300 0 7,458,833,300 75,698,993 774 19,162 19,936 Apartment Total: 166,703,000 1,094,038,100 0 1,260,741,100 14,762,000 0 83 83 Other Total: 686,000 106,000 0 792,000 11,880 0 216 216 Total: 3,942,172,100 6,850,150,700 1,337,000 10,793,659,800 131,633,164 Parcel Counts ST, LOUIS PARK Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total Commercial Total: 410,201,500 931 ,294,200 0 1,341,495,700 26,583,900 156 422 578 Farm Total: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Industrial Total: 179,877,200 29s70.000 sac o 422,363,900 8,330,637 20 246 266 Residential Total: 1,934,923,700 2,962,128,900 0 4,897,052,600 48,1 8 1,767 285 16,284 16,569 Apartment Total: 200,062,700 1,332,596,300 0 1,532,659,000 18,800,941 25 199 224 Other Total: 172,000 266,000 0 438,000 6,570 0 50 50 Total: 2,725,237,100 5,460,155,400 8,616,700 8,194,009,200 101,903,815 Parcel Counts Suburban Hennepin Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exemot Tax Total 6,230,267,200 11,435,435,900 0 1 7,665,703,100 349,553,701 3,034 5,788 8,822 518,740,900 I 84,251,500 0 702,992,400 5,982,812 12 1,432 1,444 2,551,313,400 s.292.678.700 wwwww 7,974,191,400 157,845,650 307 3,232 3,539 35,126,991,700 63,707,138,500 0 98,834.130,200 998,454,563 6.952 279,676 286,628 1,850,739,600 10,916,250,600 0 12,766,990,200 153,382,528 76 1,957 2,033 26,353,000 1 6,189,000 0 42,542,000 495,885 I 3,275 3,276 Total: Math Line Report Line Total: Math Lme Total: Math Line Report Line 46,304,405,800 91,551,944,200 ######### 137,986,549,300 1,665,715,139 10,382 295,360 305,742 sam e same sam e sam e 12,742,959,700 45,917,026,200 1,639,000 58,661,624,900 sam e 736,393,180 934 19,956 20,890 486 17,201 17,687 sam e same same Parcel Counts MINNEAPOLIS Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total 2,6 I 0,344,400 8,502,458,800 0 11,112,803,200 219,718,657 4,411 4,537 8,948 119,500 1,409,600 0 1,529,100 15,291 0 0 0 849,606,700 72osoo poss 1,584,536,500 31,353,054 211 1,112 1,323 7,859,911, I 00 26,436,092,700 0 34,296,003.800 347.286,113 1,741 114,333 116,074 1,405, 1 06,900 10,234,113,500 0 11,639,220,400 137,652,740 287 3.892 4,179 17,871,100 9,660,800 0 27,53 1,900 367,325 0 168 168 6,650 124,042 130,692 Parcel Counts Hennepin County Land Value Bldg Value Machinery Market Value Tax Capacity Exempt Tax Total 8,840,61 1,600 19,937,894,700 0 28,778,506,300 569,272,358 7,445 10,325 17,770 518,860,400 185,661,100 0 704,521,500 5,998,103 12 1,432 1,444 3,400,920, I 00 6.02s.969.500 ww 9,558,727,900 189,198,704 518 4,344 4,862 42,986,902,800 90,143,23 1,200 0 133,130,134,000 1,345,740,676 8,693 394,009 402,702 3,255,846,500 21,150,364,100 0 24,406,210,600 291,035,268 363 5,849 6,212 44,224,100 25,849,800 0 70,073,900 863,210 I 3,443 3,444 59,047,365,500 137,468,970,400 ######### 196,648,174,200 2,402,108,319 17,032 419,402 436,434 % Primary PT's 59.7% Mkt Value Tax Ca Taxable MV 27.4% 40.9% Same 0.0% 0.0% 0.99% 2,128,889 5.9% 8.7% Same 55.5% 40.2% 3.93% 7,821,612,26 1 11.2% 10.1% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 218% 14,361,204,650 % Primary PT's 40.0% Mkt Value Tax Ca sp Taxable M,V 7.7% 13.0% Same 0.4% 0.3% Same 10.9% 18.6% Same 72.9% 59.6% 5.11% 5,795,033,045 8.1% 8.4% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 3.73% 8,065,987,045 % Primary PT's 42.2% Mkt Value Tax Ca r Taxable MV 13.3% 21.5% Same 0.0% 0.0% 0.85% 5,307,722 7.1% 11.4% Same 70.3% 57.8% 1.67% 7,839,495,34 1 9.3% 9.2% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 1.17% 11,203,920,963 % Primary PT's 35.7% Mkt Value Tax Cap Taxable MV 14.5% 23.3% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 2.2% 3.5% Same 74.4% 64.3% 0.87% 9,804,179, I I 6 90% 8.9% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 0.65% 13,211,731,716 % Primary PT's Mkt Value Tax Ca r Taxable MV 18.1% 28.3% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 8.1% 12.5% Same 62.6% 48.8% 2.54% 2,672,012,505 11.1% 10.4% 0.00% 487,213,420 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 1.59% 4,306,746,825 % Primary PT's - Mkt Value Tax Ca Taxable MV 15.0% 23.1% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 8.6% 13.3% Same 50.8% 39.2% 3.79% 1,143,805,402 25.5% 24.3% 0.00% 597,319,010 0.1% 0.1% Same 100.0% 100.0% 1 .93% 2,294,370,112 % Primary PT's 34.0% Mkt Value Tax Ca Taxable MV I 1.0% 18.7% Same 0.2% 0.2% 0.21% 25,760,148 6.3% 10.7% Same 77.9% 65.8% 2.63% 8,067,695,132 4.5% 4.6% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 2.05% I 0,412,23 I ,280 % Primary PT's 42.5% Mkt Value Tax Ca r Taxable MV 15.9% 25.8% Same 0.0% 0.0% 0.15% 1,056,509 3.3% 5.4% Same 69.1% 57.5% 1.75% 7,327,970,198 11.7% 11.2% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% I.21% I 0,662,795,107 % Primary PT's Mkt Value Tax Ca 16.4% 26.1% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 5.2% 8.2% Same 59.8% 47.3% 2.91% 4,754,777,72 1 18.7% 18.4% 0.01% 1,532,577,880 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 1.74% 8,05 I ,653,20 I % Primary PT's Mkt Value Tax Cap 12.8% 21.0% Same 0.5% 0.4% 0.73% 697,881,918 5.8% 9.5% 7,209,472,700 71.6% 59.9% 2.56% 96,304,060,622 9.3% 9.2% 0.00% 12,766,401,885 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 2.39% 1 34,686,062,225 135,450,780,925 % Primary PT's 52.8% Mkt Value Tax Ca { Taxable MV 18.9% 29.8% Same 0.0% 0.0% Same 2.7% 4.3% Same 58.5% 47.2% 2. 76% 33,351,143,116 19.8% 18.7% 0.02% 11,636,438,218 0.0% 0.0% Same 100.0% 100.0% 1.62% 57,713,982,034 % Primary PT's 43.7% Mkt Value Tax Ca Taxable MV 14.6% 23.7% Same 0.4% 0.2% 0.73% 699,411,018 4.9% 7.9% Same 67.7% 56.0% 261% 129,655,203,738 12.4% 12.1% 0.01% 24,402,840,1 03 0.0% 0.0% Same 1000% 100.0% 1.77% 193,164,762,959 193.164,762,959 same same same same same same same same Source: Hennepin County- Replicates Data from Report No. 318201 -- Prelim Annual w/ Run date as 2020-07-29 Property Type Compilations Commercial C, CT, GC, LC, SL, SM Farm BF,DF,F,FF, FP,LE, PF Industrial I & LI- CR & U by State Residential B, BJ, 0, DB, DJ, HR, HS, LL, LR, LV, P, R, RL, RM, RZ, S, SR, TP, X, XC, XM, Y, Z Apartment A, AX, HF, HL, HM, LA, NH Other K, MH, NC, ND, NP, SC City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Page 12 T a x C a p a c ity 5-Year Taxable Market Value I ■ Assess Year > > 2016 2017 2018 2019 Prelim 2020 TC Change 2016 2017 2018 2019 Prelim 2020 Bloomington 161,214,289 170,233,583 179,087,361 190,107,693 195,770,125 28.4% 11,576,231,187 12,321,959,330 13,024,266,548 13,950,446,070 14,361,204,650 Brooklyn Park 70,827,359 78,889,860 83,495,183 90,902,424 97,523,554 48.3% 5,810,730,733 6,485,815,192 6,902,070,350 7,537,394,926 8,065,987,045 Eden Prairie 119,822,623 123,909,744 128,777,793 134,266,288 138,959,093 18.9% 9,596,625,246 9,970,009,481 10,404,283,316 10,881,929,301 11,203,920,963 Edina 131,623,185 141,343,449 150,677,000 156,950,624 163,819,645 30.9% 10,756,574,354 11,517,229,232 12,240,795,948 12,739,680,495 13,211,731,716 Golden Valley 42,748,968 45,436,776 49,442,493 53,111,161 55,846,997 38.8% 3,248,099,453 3,497,694,355 3,815,929,283 4,108,073,180 4,306,746,825 Hopkins 23,023,509 24,243,195 24,941,160 27,722,178 29,861,454 38.6% 1,721,105,311 1,826,002,360 1,923,161,502 2,144,791,579 2,294,370,112 Maple Grove 94,943,900 100,848,709 108,016,640 116,539,809 123,859,236 36.1% 8,026,431,893 8,528,384,132 9,139,549,304 9,837,996,206 10,412,231,280 Minnetonka 106,597,190 111,265,634 118,361,055 124,069,925 131,633,164 27.1% 8,503,784,119 8,916,280,393 9,550,749,983 10,041,700,251 10,662,795,107 St. Louis Park 77,324,247 81,292,437 88,023,090 95,317,915 101,903,815 43.3% 6,105,899,394 6,449,979,998 6,999,515,289 7,583,784,063 8,051,653,201 Suburban 1,302,343,583 1,385,239,563 1,473,281,993 1,574,770,824 1,665,715,139 35.7% 105,413,588,376 112,426,512,208 120,069,665,186 128,404,132,697 134,686,062,225 Minneapolis 540,846,454 591,237,190 652,090,217 698,471,539 736,393,180 50.1% 42,337,445,108 46,253,375,485 51,133,746,348 54,812,131,567 57,713,982,034 Hennepin 1,843,190,037 1,976,476,753 2, 125,372,210 2,273,456,907 2,402,108,319 39.8% 147,751,033,484 158,679,887,693 171,203,411,534 183,278,538,764 193,164,762,959 0 0 0 214,544 0 0 0 62,274,500 1,843,190,037 1,976,476,753 2,125,372,210 2,273,242,363 147,751,033,484 158,679,887,693 171,203,411,534 183,216,264,264 Tax Capacity Taxable Market Value 2015-t0-2016 2016-10-2017 2017-10-2018 2018-t0-2019 2019-t0-2020 2015-t0-2016 2016-10-2017 2017-t0-2018 2018-t0-2019 2019-t0-2020 Bloomington 5.7% 5.6% 5.2% 6.2% 3.0% 5.7% 6.4% 5.7% 7.1% 2.9% Brooklyn Park 7.7% 11.4% 5.8% 8.9% 7.3% 7.6% 11.6% 6.4% 9.2% 7.0% Eden Prairie 2.5% 3.4% 3.9% 4.3% 3.5% 2.5% 3.9% 4.4% 4.6% 3.0% Edina 5.2% 7.4% 6.6% 4.2% 4.4% 4.7% 7.1% 6.3% 4.1% 3.7% Golden Valley 6.3% 6.3% 8.8% 7.4% 5.2% 5.6% 7.7% 9.1% 7.7% 4.8% Hopkins 6.9% 5.3% 2.9% 11.2% 7.7% 7.2% 6.1% 5.3% 11.5% 7.0% Maple Grove 4.3% 6.2% 7.1% 7.9% 6.3% 4.5% 6.3% 7.2% 7.6% 5.8% Minnetonka 3.0% 4.4% 6.4% 4.8% 6.1% 3.3% 4.9% 7.1% 5.1% 6.2% St. Louis Park 8.7% 5.1% 8.3% 8.3% 6.9% 8.5% 5.6% 8.5% 8.3% 6.2% Suburban 6.1% 6.4% 6.4% 6.9% 5.8% 6.0% 6.7% 6.8% 6.9% 4.9% Minneapolis 10.3% 9.3% 10.3% 7.1% 5.4% 9.9% 9.2% 10.6% 7.2% 5.3% Hennepin 7.3% 7.2% 7.5% 7.0% 5.7% 7.1% 7.4% 7.9% 7.1% 5.4% Source: Hennepin County - Replicates Data from Report No. 318201 -- Final Runs with exception of current assessment Current assessment is latest available (Run date as 2020-07-29). City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000 Page 13 *note: this does not factor in fiscal disparities and is only a rough estimate of which property class is contributing to our General fund20192019 based on property class20202020 % based on property classGeneral fund budget26,880,004 28,393,728 Property class‐Tax CapacityCommercial*24,808,320 26.03%6,996,038 26,583,900 26.09% 7,407,142 Industrial7,395,585 7.76%2,085,582 8,330,637 8.18% 2,321,187 Residential47,046,679 49.36%13,267,337 48,181,767 47.28% 13,425,012 Apartment 16,061,226 16.85% 4,529,325 18,800,941 18.45% 5,238,556 Other 6,105 0.01% 1,722 6,570 0.01% 1,831 total95,317,915 26,880,004 101,903,815 28,393,728 City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8a) Title: Bid tab for Dakota-Edgewood Trail Bridge – project 4019-2000Page 14 Meeting: City council Meeting date: September 8, 2020 Action agenda item: 8b Executive summary Title: Council ward 2 seat resignation and vacancy Recommended action: **Due to the COVID-19 emergency declaration, this item is considered essential business and is categorized as a Required Action** • Motion to adopt Resolution accepting Councilmember Anne Mavity’s re signation for Ward 2 effective October 31, 2020 and declare a vacancy of Ward 2 city council seat effective October 31, 2020. Policy consideration: Does the city council accept Councilmember Anne Mavity’s resignation for Ward 2 effective October 31, 2020 and declare a vacancy of ward 2 council seat effe ctive October 31, 2020? Summary: Councilmember Anne Mavity announces and submits resignation for Ward 2 seat effective October 31, 2020. Per City Charter, the council shall declare a vacancy promptly after the resignation occurs. Given the timing of the resignation, the city council is required to appoint a person to the seat for the remainder of the term – until January 3, 2022. The city council may use various methods for appointing a person to fill this seat and may start the process prior to the effective date of the resignation. These methods include: • Appoint someone to the seat • Undertake an application process, interview, and appoint Note, 4 of 6 votes are required for appointment. If councilmember Mavity still happens to be in office at the time the council determines who to appoint, councilmember Mavity cannot vote on the matter and should refrain from participating. The appointment process will be discussed at the September 14, 2020 city council study session. Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable. Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable. Supporting documents: Resolution Resignation n otice Prepared by: Maria Solano, senior management analyst Soren Mattick, city attorney Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager Approve d by: Tom Harmening, city manager City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8b ) Page 2 Title: Council ward 2 seat resignation and vacancy Resolution No. 20-____ Resolution accepting resignation and declaring vacancy in the office ward 2 councilmember Whereas, St. Louis Park City Councilmember Anne Mavity has submitted a letter of resignation effective October 31, 2020, leaving a vacancy in the office for a term expiring January 3, 2022; and Whereas, pursuant Chapter 2.05 of the City Charter the City Council shall accept the resignation and declare a vacancy for the remainder of the unexpired term. Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of St. Louis Park that a vacancy is hereby declared for the office of Councilmember Ward 2 effective October 31, 2020 for the remainder of the term to expire January 3, 2022. Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council September 8, 2020 Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor Attest: Melissa Kennedy, city clerk City council meeting of September 8, 2020 (Item No. 8b ) Page 3 Title: Council ward 2 seat resignation and vacancy Dear Mayor Spano and City Manager Harmening, After eleven years of serving this amazing community of St. Louis Park, and representing the residents and businesses in Ward 2, I submit my resignation from City Council effective October 31st, 2020. For personal reasons, my husband and I are downsizing, and we have been exploring how to stay nearby while living in a smaller home. We unexpectedly found that home just over a mile away, but alas the new townhome is located in Minneapolis. This move, scheduled for the end of October, necessitates my resignation from city council. As a resident in St. Louis Park for the past 23 years, I have seen this community constantly strive to continue its record of excellence and I have been honored to be a part of its vision and growth. I have enormous gratitude for the privilege of serving the city of St. Louis Park for the past 11 years. I am committed to a smooth transition, and look forward to how I can be helpful in supporting that. The City Council is empowered by the city charter to make an appointment to fill out my term in the manner of your choosing but a special election is not required. Sincerely, Anne Mavity