HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019/12/16 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - RegularAGENDA
DEC. 16, 2019
6:20 p.m. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – council chambers
1.Call to order
2.Roll call
3.Approval of minutes
3a. EDA meeting minutes Dec. 2, 2019
4.Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar -- None
5.Reports -- None
7.New business
7a. 2020 final HRA levy certification and budget adoption
Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the 2020 final HRA levy.
6:30 p.m. CITY COUNCIL MEETING – council chambers
1.Call to order
1a. Pledge of allegiance
1b. Roll call
2. Presentations
2a. Recognition of donations
3.Approval of minutes
3a. City council meeting minutes of Nov. 18, 2019
3b. Special study session minutes of Nov. 18, 2019
3c. Study session minutes of Nov. 25, 2019
4.Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar
NOTE: The Consent Calendar lists those items of business which are considered to be routine and/or which need no
discussion. Consent items are acted upon by one motion. If discussion is desired by either a Councilmember or a
member of the audience, that item may be moved to an appropriate section of the regular agenda for discussion.
The items for the Consent Calendar are listed on the last page of the Agenda.
Recommended action: Motion to approve the Agenda as presented and items listed on the Consent
Calendar; and to waive reading of all resolutions and ordinances. (Alternatively: Motion to add or remove
items from the agenda, or move items from Consent Calendar to regular agenda for discussion.)
5.Boards and commissions – None
Meeting of Dec. 16, 2019
City council agenda
6. Public hearings
6a. Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Recommended action: Mayor is asked to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then
close the public hearing. Motion to approve the first reading of an ordinance prohibiting the
sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products and set second reading for January 6, 2020.
7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – None
8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items
8a. 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan
(CIP)
Recommended action:
• Motion to adopt Resolution approving the 2020 budgets and authorizing the 2020 final
property tax levy.
• Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the 2020 final HRA levy.
• Motion to adopt Resolution approving the 2020-2029 capital improvement plan.
• Motion to adopt 2019 budget amendment.
8b. Resolution accepting annual city manager evaluation
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution for formal acceptance of the final city
manager annual evaluation.
8c. 2020 non-union employee compensation
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution confirming a 3% general increase for non-
union employees effective 1/1/20, approving the city manager’s salary for 2020, and
continuing participation in the Volunteer Firefighter Benefit Program.
8d. Recognition of Councilmembers Steve Hallfin and Thom Miller
Recommended action:
• On behalf of the city council and city manager, the mayor is asked to recognize Steve
Hallfin for his years of service as Councilmember At Large A of the St. Louis Park City
Council from Jan. 3, 2012 to Jan. 6, 2020.
• On behalf of the city council and city manager, the mayor is asked to recognize Thom
Miller for his years of service as Councilmember At Large B of the St. Louis Park City
Council from Jan. 4, 2016 to Jan. 6, 2020.
9. Communications – None
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the administration department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting of Dec. 16, 2019
City council agenda
Consent calendar
4a. Approve the second reading and adopt Ordinance amending chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park
code of ordinances relating to the zoning map and to publish the revised official zoning map.
4b. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending Section 36-361 pertaining to off-
street parking and to approve the summary ordinance for publication.
4c. Adopt Resolution to recognize Chad Kraayenbrink for his years of service.
4d. Adopt Resolution approving final plans and specifications, and authorizing advertisement for
bids for Louisiana Avenue Bridge replacement - Project No. 4018-1700.
4e. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance prohibiting parking in city hall east lot and
approve summary ordinance for publication.
4f. Approve the 2020 Neighborhood Grants.
4g. Adopt Resolution authorizing execution of a contract with Summit Envirosolutions, Inc.
(Summit) for 2020 consultant services related to the implementation of the Reilly Tar &
Chemical Corporation (Reilly) Remedial Action Plan (RAP).
4h. Adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a $100 donation from St. Louis Park Golden Kiwanis
for the Westwood Hills Nature Center 38th annual Halloween party and $100 from Leslie
Marcus for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center.
4i. Adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final payment in the amount of $9,497.98
for the annual concrete replacement project with Universal Services, Inc. - Project No. 4019-
0003, City Contract No. 60-19.
4j. Authorize execution of an amendment to the professional services contract with SRF
Consulting Group, Inc. in the amount of $163,248.61 for the preliminary and final design of
the Dakota-Edgewood bridge and bikeway project (4019-2000).
4k. Adopt Resolution delegating authority to make electronic funds transfer.
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority and regular city council meetings are carried live on civic TV cable
channel 17 and replays are frequent; check www.parktv.org for the schedule. The meetings are also streamed live
on the internet at www.parktv.org, and saved for video on demand replays. The agenda is posted on Fridays on
the official city bulletin board in the lobby of city hall and on the text display on civic TV cable channel 17. The
agenda and full packet are available by noon on Friday on the city’s website.
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Minutes: 3a
Unofficial minutes
EDA meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Dec. 2, 2019
1. Call to order
President Hallfin called the meeting to order at 6:25 p.m.
Commissioners present: President Steve Hallfin, Tim Brausen, Rachel Harris, Anne Mavity,
Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog.
Commissioners absent: Jake Spano, Tim Brausen
Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), Community Development Director (Ms.
Barton), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Chief Financial Officer (Mr. Simon), Police Chief Harcey,
Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), Building & Energy Director (Mr.
Hoffman), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Assistant Zoning Administrator (Mr. Morrison),
Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), Planner (Ms. Monson), City Clerk (Ms. Kennedy), City Assessor
(Mr. Bultema), Senior Engineering Project Manager (Mr. Sullivan), Transportation Engineer (Mr.
Manibog), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
2. Roll call
3. Approval of minutes
3a. EDA meeting minutes of November 4, 2019
It was moved by Commissioner Harris, seconded by Commissioner Miller, to approve the
Nov. 4, 2019 meeting minutes as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Brausen and Spano absent).
4. Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar
4a. Accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of Oct. 26 through Nov.
22, 2019.
4b. Adopt EDA Resolution No. 19-14 approving the decertification of the Edgewood
TIF District.
4c. Adopt EDA Resolution No. 19-15 modifying the tax increment financing plan for
the Wolfe Lake TIF District to allow for additional pooling for affordable housing.
4d. Adopt EDA Resolution No. 19-16 modifying the tax increment financing plan for
the Ellipse TIF District to allow for additional pooling for affordable housing.
It was moved by Commissioner Mavity, seconded by Commissioner Harris, to approve
the EDA agenda as presented and the items on the consent calendar.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Brausen and Spano absent).
Economic development authority meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: Economic development authority meeting minutes of December 2, 2019
5. Reports - none
6. Old business - none
7. New business - none
8. Communications – none
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 6:27 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, secretary Steve Hallfin, president
Meeting: Economic development authority
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Action agenda item: 7a
Executive summary
Title: 2020 final HRA levy certification and budget adoption
Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution authorizing the 2020 final HRA levy.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA desire to continue to levy the full 0.0185% of estimated
market value allowable for HRA purposes of $1,332,978.
Summary: The preliminary levy was approved on September 16 and no changes are being
recommended for the final approval.
The HRA levy was originally implemented in St. Louis Park due to legislative changes in 2001
which significantly reduced future tax increment revenues. The city council elected at that time
to use the levy proceeds for future infrastructure improvements in redevelopment areas. By
law, these funds could also be used for other housing and redevelopment purposes. Given the
council’s desire for housing activities, staff recommends the HRA Levy continue at the
maximum allowed by law for the 2020 budget year.
The HRA Levy cannot exceed 0.0185% of the estimated market value of the city. Therefore,
staff has calculated the maximum HRA Levy for 2020 to be $1,332,978 based on valuation data
from Hennepin County which is an increase of $98,377 from 2019.
The EDA is allowed to authorize the HRA levy and then forward this recommendation to the city
council. Council action is required before certification.
Financial or budget considerations: The proposed levy is $1,332,978 for taxes payable 2020.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: EDA resolution
2020 final HRA levy and budget
Prepared by: Tim Simon, chief financial officer
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
Economic development authority meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 7a) Page 2
Title: 2020 final HRA levy certification and budget adoption
EDA Resolution No. 19-____
Authorizing the final levy of
a special benefit levy pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033,
subdivision 6 and approval of a final budget for fiscal year 2020
Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the “EDA Act”),
the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park created the St. Louis Park Economic Development
Authority (the "Authority"); and
Whereas, pursuant to the EDA Act, the city council granted to the Authority all of the
powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under the provisions of the
Minnesota Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and
Whereas, Section 469.033, Subdivision 6, of the HRA Act permits the Authority to levy
and collect a special benefit levy of up to 0.0185 percent of estimated market value in the city
upon all taxable real property within the city; and
Whereas, the Authority desires to levy a special benefit levy in the amount of up to 0.0185
percent of estimated market value in the city for taxes payable in 2020; and
Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.065, the Authority is required to
adopt a proposed budget and a proposed tax levy and submit the same to the County Auditor by
December 28; and
Whereas, the Authority has before it for its consideration a copy of a proposed budget
for its operations for the fiscal year 2020 and the amount of the proposed levy for collection in
2020 shall be based on this budget and the long range financial management plan, subject to
any adjustments in the budget as finally approved prior to certification of the final special
benefit levy.
Now therefore be it resolved, be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the St.
Louis Park Economic Development Authority:
1.The proposed budget of $1,332,978 for the operations of the Authority in fiscal year
2020, as presented for consideration by the city council, is hereby in all respects
approved, subject to final approval by the Authority before certification of the tax
levy under Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.07.
2.Staff of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to file the proposed
budget with the city in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033,
Subdivision 6.
3.The proposed special benefit levy pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.033,
Subdivision 6, is hereby approved in a maximum amount equal to 0.0185 percent of
estimated market value in City of St. Louis Park, currently estimated to be
Economic development authority meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 7a) Page 3
Title: 2020 final HRA levy certification and budget adoption
$7,205,290,500, with respect to taxes payable in calendar year 2020, subject to final
approval by the Authority before certification of the special benefit levy pursuant to
Minnesota Statutes, Section 275.07.
4.Staff of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to seek the approval by
resolution of the city council of the levy of special benefit taxes payable in 2020 and
to take such other actions as are necessary to bring before the Board the final
budget and levy to be sent to the county auditor on or before five working days after
December 20, 2019.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority, Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, executive director Steve Hallfin, president
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Economic development authority meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 7a) Page 4
Title: 2020 final HRA levy certification and budget adoption
HRA Levy
2020 Final Budget
2018 2019 2020
Actual Revised Budget Final Budget
Revenues:
Property Tax Levy 1,172,896$ 1,234,601$ 1,332,978$
Interest Income 2,036 - -
Total Revenue 1,174,932$ 1,234,601$ 1,332,978$
Expenditures:
Services and Other Charges 15,249$ 15,000$ 15,000$
Transfer - out (Housing Rehab)-$ -$ 272,248$
Transfer - out (Housing Trust Fund)-$ -$ 1,045,730$
Final payment (HWY 7 & Louis.)108,942$ -$ -$
Interfund loan repayment*999,999 1,263,200 -
Total Expenditures 1,124,190$ 1,278,200$ 1,332,978$
Net Change 50,742$ (43,599)$ -$
Estimated Loan balance 1,221,200$ -$ -$
*= repayment to interfund loan is a reduction to the balance sheet liability account.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Presentation: 2a
Executive summary
Title: Recognition of donations
Recommended action: Mayor to announce and express thanks and appreciation for the
following donations being accepted at the meeting and listed on the consent agenda:
From Donation For
St. Louis Park Golden
Kiwanis $100 The Westwood Hills Nature Center 38th annual
Halloween party
Leslie Marcus $100 Park enhancements or program needs at Westwood
Hills Nature Center
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: None
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Minutes: 3a
Unofficial minutes
City council meeting
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Nov. 18, 2019
1. Call to order
Mayor Spano called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog.
Councilmembers absent: None.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Building & Energy
Director (Mr. Hoffman), Engineering Director (Ms. Heiser), Sr. Engineering Project Manager (Mr.
Sullivan), Transportation Engineer (Mr. Manibog), Solid Waste Program Manager (Ms. Fisher),
Solid Waste Program Specialist (Ms. Barker), Sustainability Manager (Ms. Ziring), Director of
Community Development (Ms. Barton), Senior Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and
Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
Guests: Katie Jones, Center for Energy & Environment
1a. Pledge of allegiance
1b. Roll call
2. Presentations – none
3. Approval of minutes - none
4. Approval of agenda and items on consent calendar
4a. Approve second reading and adopt Ordinance No. 2575-19 amending Section
36-4 definitions and Section 36-366 architectural design to establish
transparency requirements for ground floor street facing facades in the C-1, C-2,
and MX Districts, and retail, service and restaurant uses in the O and BP Districts,
and approve the Summary Ordinance for publication.
4b. Adopt Resolution No. 19-143 authorizing the special assessment for the repair of
the sewer service line at 2749 Blackstone Avenue South, St. Louis Park, MN.
P.I.D. 09-117-21-32-0024.
4c. Adopt Resolution No. 19-144 accepting work and authorizing final payment in
the amount of $27,368.18 for the Utica Avenue Trail project with G.L.
Contracting, Inc. – Project No. 4017-2000D
4d. Adopt Resolution No. 19-145 supporting Perspectives’ State Capital Grants
Bonding Request of $4.9 million to complete their Seed the Change Capital Project.
4e. Adopt Resolution No. 19-146 authorizing the award of the 2020 arts and culture
grants.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 2
Title: City council meeting minutes of November 18, 2019
4f. Adopt Resolution No. 19-147 accepting work and authorizing final payment in
the amount of $30,253.85 to Northwest Asphalt, Inc. for the reconstruction of
three tennis courts at Carpenter Park, city contract no. 87-19.
4g. Adopt Resolution No. 19-148 accepting work and authorizing final payment in the
amount of $9,648.63 to K. A. Witt Construction, Inc. for the construction of five
pickleball courts in Wolfe Park, city contract no. 94-19.
4h. Adopt Resolution No. 19-149 authorizing installation of all-way stop controls on
Quentin Avenue at 40th Street.
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to approve
the agenda and items listed on the consent calendar as presented and to waive reading
of all resolutions and ordinances.
The motion passed 7-0.
5. Boards and commissions - none
6. Public hearings
6a. 2019 Connect the Park – Dakota Avenue South bikeway (4019-2000).
Mr. Manibog presented the staff report. He stated this project is part of Connect the
Park, the city’s 10-year capital improvement plan to add additional bikeways, sidewalks,
and trails throughout the community. He noted the project focuses on the segment
from Minnetonka Boulevard to Lake Street and noted staff estimates the total cost to
construct the bikeway will be $443,000. If the council approves the project at the Dec. 2
meeting, construction will begin in spring of 2020.
Councilmember Hallfin asked how many parking stalls will be removed and how many
will be left. Mr. Sullivan stated today there are 175 parking stalls on Dakota Avenue.
After the parking study, staff began with 63 stalls, but after public feedback, this
number was increased to 70 stalls. He added some curb extensions were removed
afterwards, increasing the stalls to 80, as proposed today.
Councilmember Harris asked how the beacon at the intersection near the high school
will be used. Mr. Manibog stated it will be activated when the button is pressed on
either side of the intersection.
Councilmember Harris asked about parking on the east side of the road at the 3100-
3200 block. Mr. Manibog stated parking there is dictated on resident’s access to public
alleys and businesses near Minnetonka Boulevard.
Councilmember Harris asked if the alley in this location can be extended for ease of
transportation and if staff had considered this. Mr. Manibog stated this had not been
considered at this point.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 3
Title: City council meeting minutes of November 18, 2019
Councilmember Mavity asked if the flashing beacon at the intersection of 33rd and
Dakota Avenue will have a beacon in the middle of the street, as in other locations. Mr.
Manibog stated no, this will not be included.
Mayor Spano opened the public hearing.
Ross Preheim, 3247 Dakota Ave., stated even with the reduction of bump outs, there
are too many parking spaces lost. He stated he does not believe the neighborhood was
listened to by the city and does not think a “share the road” option was considered. He
stated the traffic study was conducted during the week, when there are no visitors as on
weekends, and added that “share the road” marked lanes would have been a better
alternative. He stated he is a biker also, but no considerations were made for
seasonality, and losing 100 parking spots on the block is inconceivable.
Darlene Soltis, 3205 Dakota Ave., stated she has lived there for 52 years and there needs
to be some restrictions in the alley, to allow for access. She indicated the parking should
be marked on the street and she appreciated the council listening, noting that little by
little, more parking spots have been added, which she appreciates.
John Tadewald, 3148 Dakota Ave., stated he has been involved in this since the
beginning, and there was a lot of negative feedback from residents. He thanked the
council for listening and attempting to change plans, and he appreciates more parking
stalls. However, there are not enough parking stalls, especially when considering the
weekends, and this will create hardships for residents, as well as negatively affect
property values. He stated he and his wife love the area and their neighbors, but they
will reconsider living there if this plan goes through.
Matt Wandzel, 2832 Georgia Ave., stated he bikes many areas of the city and also on
Dakota Avenue. He stated there is a low shoulder on Dakota Avenue and they will need
to make sure no cars are too close to bikers. He is supportive of the latest revision and
excited about the north side of Cedar Lake Road having a trail as well. He said it is a
delicate balance and you cannot please every person, but this is a successful layout. Mr.
Wandzel stated in the future, the bike lanes will become more popular, and will need to
be expanded.
Brandon Eddy, 3274 Blackstone Ave., stated he bikes 3,000-4,000 miles per year and
rides all winter. He is the father of three, adding they ride as a family to Peter Hobart
School. He stated he chose to live in this location because it was between bike paths,
and Dakota Avenue is a connection now. He is excited for the project, adding in the
future there will need to be a larger bike lane to make it safer for bikers and families
who bike. He noted high school mountain biking is the fastest growing sport today.
Erin Freidman, 3236 Dakota Ave., thanked the staff for the revisions. She has concerns
about the driveways on the northern end of Dakota Avenue and stated 16-17 houses
will need to accommodate parking spaces, while homes across the street will not have
parking in front. She said no one is opposed to the bike lanes, but she has concerns this
is only a temporary band-aid, and this should be done correctly. She stated she will use
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 4
Title: City council meeting minutes of November 18, 2019
the light rail and will drive and park to use it, but feels a bigger and stronger plan would
be useful and support this into the future. She stated she would love to stay in her home
in this neighborhood, but there would be no parking for her husband or children in front
of her single-car garage, adding parking spots should be marked and designated.
Lynne Stobbe, 3056 Dakota Ave., stated she walked on Dakota Avenue recently and
counted 23 homes on the west side that do not have driveways, and only had alleys and
single-car garages. On the east side, there are 13 homes with no driveways. She is
concerned about parking for these folks, and also asked if the parking lots near the pizza
place can be used for customers, so they will not park on the street.
Ted Kroeteh, 3221 Dakota Ave., stated he bikes all the time and has concerns for safety
in the area, with very dark streets and poor lighting. He noted cars drive too fast here,
and now with two biking lanes, it should be better throughout. He stated this should
have been done on Colorado Avenue instead, where there is no traffic.
William Regan, owner of property at 2211 Edgewood Ave., stated he is concerned about
the bus facility located here and buses crossing into the bike trail area. He stated it is a
high-risk area, and he urged council to use as much discretion and safety as possible
when working to get buses in and out of this location safely without striking a biker. He
stated he hopes for a full stop at the crossing here and hopes the council makes it a high
priority.
Marc Berg, 2913 Webster Ave., stated he is in favor of the staff recommendations, and
had been from the beginning as well. He is administrator of the “Bike in the Park” group
on Facebook and stated this will be a great north/south route. He thanked staff for
preserving more parking and stated this is the best compromise. He added this is an
upstream fight with over 75 years of a car-centric philosophy, which is no longer
sustainable. He stated we have to think big picture, and asked the council to please
adopt this.
Dale Stenseth, 3351 Edgewood Ave., stated tonight on Dakota Avenue he saw one biker
and another one during the day. He added over the next five months, he does not
expect to see many more, adding this is a lot of work for only 6-7 months’ worth of use
during the year. He stated the city is not cyclist or walker-centric in the winter, adding
many of the aspects of this project are age discriminatory. He stated he likes to walk and
do activities outside in the summer but there is a high risk for seniors to fall in winter,
and they will continue to drive as a matter of survival. He asked what will be done about
emergency services with the no parking locations, and also what about deliveries. He
stated this is an expensive project and suggested the council delay a decision, so the
project is done properly. He thanked staff for accommodating additional parking.
Steve Kinney, 9200 West 28th St., stated he is an avid biker and he likes this plan. He
appreciates the lit crosswalks to make it more noticeable for drivers.
Susan Tadewald, 3148 Dakota Ave., stated she emailed a petition to staff where 80
people signed and are concerned about the parking and this plan as laid out currently.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 5
Title: City council meeting minutes of November 18, 2019
She stated the people are in favor of the bike lane, but do not support this layout and
also are concerned about the green permit parking for the high school students. She
asked when the other parking goes away, where will the students park, adding this
needs to be addressed. She also asked where residents will park if students are parking
in the spots in front of their homes. She stated there is also concern about buses and
safety at this busy corner on 32nd Street. She noted folks have not been heard.
Mayor Spano closed the public hearing.
Council will take final action on this project at the Dec. 2, 2019 meeting.
Councilmember Mavity asked if staff will respond to the questions of residents and
where the answers will be available. Mr. Manibog stated they will be included in the
council packet as part of the staff report, which will be available on the city website.
Councilmember Mavity asked about infrastructure issues and traffic management,
adding she would like to understand options on permit parking when this comes back to
council, in order to ensure the high school students will not be parking there. She added
she would like the staff report to also address safety measures that will be in place for
turns and sightlines.
Councilmember Harris asked about lighting safety and marking of parking spots and
asked staff to provide the costs for this in the staff report as well.
Councilmember Rog asked that staff provide information also about a buffered bike
lane, and the cost of a multi-use trail in the staff report.
Councilmember Harris asked staff for more information about biking infrastructure and
additional costs for protected bike lanes.
7. Requests, petitions, and communications from the public – none
8. Resolutions, ordinances, motions and discussion items
8a. Planned unit development major amendment to Section 36-268-PUD 9
It was moved by Councilmember Mavity, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to table
the first reading of an ordinance amending Section 36-268-PUD 9 based on information
learned at the study session held earlier this evening.
The motion passed 7-0.
8b. Benilde-St. Margaret’s – conditional use permit approving a major amendment
to the existing special permit
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 6
Title: City council meeting minutes of November 18, 2019
Mr. Morrison stated the request is to convert an interior courtyard to classrooms and to
construct an accessory building for the athletic complex. Mr. Morrison stated the
planning commission recommends approval of the major amendment.
It was moved by Councilmember Rog, seconded by Councilmember Brausen, to approve
conditional use permit authorizing a major amendment to the special permit to allow a
building expansion and accessory building at Benilde-St. Margaret’s school with
conditions.
The motion passed 7-0.
8c. Zero Waste Packaging 2020 Acceptable Materials, Exemptions List and
Administrative Rules
Ms. Barker presented the staff report. She noted the existing exemptions which were
recommended to be kept and the new proposed exemptions.
Councilmember Harris asked about the exempted Asian takeout pails, and suggested
they not be exempted, as alternative takeout containers that are acceptable, could be
utilized.
Councilmember Hallfin agreed with Councilmember Harris, and noted he agreed with
the staff recommendations as well.
Councilmember Miller also agreed with both Councilmembers Harris and Hallfin. He
asked staff how many city restaurants this would affect. Ms. Barker stated seven (7)
restaurants use this type of takeout container.
Councilmember Miller asked if paper plates are not compostable. Ms. Barker stated that
due to changes in the certification requirements, most brands of paper plates are losing
their certification at the end of 2019. She stated the city is working to find alternatives
that are certified and acceptable for composting, and then will educate residents on this
change.
Councilmember Brausen asked if this change will be imposed on restaurants in January
of 2020. Ms. Barker stated that if the takeout pail exemption is removed, there should
be a six-month delay for restaurants to have time to implement new supplies.
Ashley Kennedy and Kim Erickson, Zero Waste West Metro, spoke briefly and noted it is
in the city’s best interest to pursue these sustainability measures.
Councilmember Rog asked if staff has had any comments from the restaurants affected
by the Asian takeout pail exemption, and if cost is considered by the city for the changes
these restaurants will have to make. Ms. Barker stated cost is not a factor the city
considers as part of the ordinance.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 7
Title: City council meeting minutes of November 18, 2019
Councilmember Rog stated she would like to hear more from the ESC on this issue and
after understanding the impact of these actions, she will not support this motion.
Councilmember Rog asked how well businesses in the city follow the recycling and
composting ordinances. Ms. Barker stated it depends on how each are set up and it
varies a lot. She added when they have good signage, and when customers sort
correctly, that is helpful. Councilmember Rog suggested all restaurants use visuals and
signage to help with recycling and composting of items.
Councilmember Miller asked why this list is only reviewed once per year. Ms. Barker
stated exemptions are reviewed annually, as it could be difficult for restaurants if it
were reviewed more often.
Councilmember Brausen asked if staff has authority to issue citations if restaurants do
not follow the requirements. Mr. Mattick stated yes, it is enforceable.
Mayor Spano added he would be interested in seeing a more robust engagement with
the community on cleaning recyclable items before they are put into bins. Ms. Barker
agreed and noted this practice has gotten stricter in the last two years.
Mayor Spano stated that Hennepin County has started to require cities to offer curbside
organics programs to residents and what that might mean related to the availability of
compostable products. Ms. Barker stated that all cities in the county will be required to
have an organics program by 2022, that is available to all city’s residents, or drop-sites
for smaller cities. She is not sure how much the county’s ordinance will have an impact
on the availability of compostable products, but stated that the City of St. Paul’s
packaging ordinance going into effect in 2020 may have more of an impact.
Mayor Spano added he would like to see staff come back sooner than a year from now
to review updates on this issue.
Councilmember Brausen thanked staff for their work on this, adding the bottom line is
that consumers need to participate and be active on this as well, and business leaders
need to step up and lead in this area.
It was moved by Councilmember Harris, seconded by Councilmember Mavity, to approve
the 2020 Acceptable Materials and Exemptions List and Administrative Rules, and
remove the Asian take-out pails from the exempt materials, effective July 1, 2020.
The motion passed 6-1 (Councilmember Rog opposed).
8d. Efficient building benchmarking ordinance
Mr. Hoffman introduced the city’s new Sustainability Manager, Emily Ziring, and Katie
Jones from the Center for Energy and Environment.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3a) Page 8
Title: City council meeting minutes of November 18, 2019
Ms. Jones presented a report on how the proposed efficient building benchmarking
program would look, including how data would be gathered and presented, within the
EPA standards.
Ms. Jones stated St. Louis Park is a pilot city in the collaborative, which is an initiative of
Hennepin County to support the benchmarking ordinance.
Mr. Hoffman stated the goal with the ordinance is to work with companies and help
them with carbon emissions and to help them save money, adding it’s a win-win
situation.
Mayor Spano stated he is pleased to see this program in place and said it will be helpful
when speaking to residents about the priorities of the city related to the CAP.
Ryan Griffin, ESC commissioner, stated this is one of the initiatives the city can do in
2019, and it is awesome and exciting. He added this has helped other cities see
significant reductions, and this is just the beginning. He noted this is an easy incentive
which will save businesses money.
Stephan Collinet, ESC commissioner, encouraged the council to adopt the ordinance. He
stated this initial roll out will incentivize other businesses to jump in, as well as
residents, and encouraged the city to work with other cities.
Larry Kraft, ESC commissioner, stated this is step one of a broader business engagement
initiative and he is excited to build partnerships and help businesses move forward on this.
It was moved by Councilmember Brausen, seconded by Councilmember Harris, to
approve the first reading of the efficient building benchmarking ordinance and set the
second reading of ordinance for Dec. 2, 2019.
The motion passed 7-0
9. Communications
Mayor Spano thanked all residents for voting in the most recent municipal election,
noting there was great voter turnout and he appreciates folks being involved in their
municipal government.
10. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Minutes: 3b
Unofficial minutes
City council special study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Nov. 18, 2019
The meeting convened at 5:45 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog.
Councilmembers absent: none.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Building and Energy
Director (Mr. Hoffman), Economic Development Coordinator (Mr. Hunt), Director of
Community Development (Ms. Barton), Senior Planner (Mr. Walther), Planner (Ms. Monson),
Communications Manager (Ms. Smith), Chief Building Official (Mr. Skallet), Senior Management
Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
Guests: Martha Ingram, EDA Special Counsel; Chris Velasco, PLACE
1. PLACE Via Sol and Via Luna projects update
Mr. Harmening gave an outline of the project to date. He noted Mr. Velasco submitted a letter
on Nov. 15 indicating he is unable to move forward with phase 2/Via Luna, because the city is
not being cooperative on issuing the building permit. Mr. Harmening stated this is a serious
matter which will need to be discussed with council.
Mr. Hoffman noted the timeline of the project, both north and south sides. He stated the north
side has submitted updated plans and been issued permits. He stated Stahl construction is
ready to begin the north side of the project.
Councilmember Mavity asked for clarity on what the council is being asked for with the 6th
amendment and if it only relates to the south side or includes the north side as well. Mr.
Harmening stated the 6th amendment refers to the construction timeline for both the north and
south parcels, but if the south side construction does not proceed, the 6th amendment would
not include amended timelines for the south parcel.
Councilmember Rog asked if the Egeneration that was planned for the south parcel would be
moved to the north parcel. Ms. Ingram stated items from the south parcel project could be tied
into the north side and dealt with in the 6th amendment.
Mr. Velasco added he finds it impossible to move forward with Via Luna and the hotel project,
but that the Egeneration piece would move to the north side.
Councilmember Mavity asked Mr. Velasco if there is an impact now to the north side project, if
the south side goes away. Mr. Velasco stated the north side project is financially designed to
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3b) Page 2
Title: Special study session minutes of November 18, 2019
stand on its own and does not need the south side to be completed. He added the phase 1
construction has begun offsite.
Councilmember Mavity stated she wants to hear from staff if they have concerns about the
north side and if that portion of the project should come to a stop. Mr. Harmening stated the
permits and financing are in place for the north side and PLACE owns the land.
Councilmember Miller stated he is concerned about this letter from Mr. Velasco, adding the city
has been an extraordinary partner in this project and he would never speak to a partner this
way or call out a staff member when the city has done everything possible to make this project
happen. He stated he is concerned about the attitude from PLACE, adding this may impact the
north construction and create ongoing problems. He said he has been an advocate of this
project and does not think the council made a mistake partnering with PLACE but added he
does feel the partnership has had a significant break and this is his chief concern.
Councilmember Mavity added there are other concerns with this project as well, noting there
are public money and investments involved in the north side project, with many non-profit
investors and bonds included for the affordable housing component. Now this becomes a big
risk and funding would be lost if the project were not to continue.
Mr. Mattick advised the applicant can withdraw the application for the south side project and
the council may table the PUD and bring it back for further discussion with staff at a later date.
Councilmember Hallfin stated he was always in support of this project from the beginning, but
after all the delays, he began to vote against this. He added with the letter from Mr. Velasco, it
is very disappointing, and he is sad about this situation. He stated if the council had not
continued extending the project deadlines, a new developer could have been brought in and
the city would not be in this situation. He asked Mr. Velasco to get the north side done and to
do it right.
The meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Minutes: 3c
Unofficial minutes
City council study session
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Nov. 25, 2019
The meeting convened at 6:30 p.m.
Councilmembers present: Mayor Jake Spano, Tim Brausen, Steve Hallfin, Rachel Harris, Anne
Mavity, Thom Miller, and Margaret Rog.
Councilmembers absent: none.
Staff present: City Manager (Mr. Harmening), Deputy City Manager/Human Resources Director
(Ms. Deno), Communications Manager (Ms. Smith), Community Organizer (Mr. Gray), Senior
Management Analyst (Ms. Solano), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
Guests: Scott Morrell, President & Consultant-Rebar Leadership; Larry Kraft, Nadia Mohamed.
1. Future study session agenda planning and prioritization
Mr. Harmening stated there will be a full agenda for the Dec. 9 meeting. He suggested to
Councilmember Miller he could conference call into the meeting, since he will be out of town.
Councilmember Rog asked when the food access and security study would be coming forward.
Mr. Harmening stated it will be on the Jan. 27 agenda.
Councilmember Mavity asked when the crime free ordinance would be discussed. Mr.
Harmening stated staff has completed work on this, and it will be included in a community
listening session, but the date is still yet to be determined.
2. Council communication discussion
Mr. Harmening introduced Mr. Morrell, President and Consultant with Rebar Leadership.
Mr. Morrell led a discussion with the council about the issue from this past summer, to discuss,
debrief, and look forward. Mr. Morrell stated he had interviewed each council member
individually before tonight’s discussion and based on these conversations with council and staff,
now is the right time to have this conversation with staff and the full council.
Mr. Morrell stated the purpose of the meeting is:
• To reflect on the summer 2019 experience together
• To model the way for effective governance behavior to one another and the community
• To start rebuilding process for effective trust among one another
• To heal, where necessary, past value(s) violations
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3c) Page 2
Title: Study session minutes of November 25, 2019
The council reflected on the experience and noted the following experiences, ripple effects,
learnings, what worked, what did not work, and action steps for future:
• Chaotic
• Like a hurricane
• Isolation, very unsupported
• Vulnerability
• Void of leadership, guilty, harmful to the community
• Helplessness, difficult
• A PR crisis and media created it
• Extreme impacts to staff
• Violation of council norms
• Saw people at their worst
• Staff angry and shaken, confidence in leadership shaken
• Mistakes made, failure
• Training needed on how to talk with media, on how to be Mayor Pro Tem
• When a decision is made, need to all stand behind it
• Follow due process, take risks, and do what we think is right, even if challenging – this
process felt unbalanced
• This was a procedural decision, not an event, but lead to a policy decision ultimately
• Regretted not saying stop or slow down
• Became a difficult issue with staff, veteran employees, became political, staff was
angered, shook foundations of confidence and trust in leadership
• Emotions still there, lessons learned for future, need to be better prepared
• Brought out the worst in people, turned into a race issue
• Concern for safety and security
• Anger and angst in community, great deal of passion, intense and difficult phone calls,
voice mails and emails, biases and misogyny were evident
• Felt my safety at risk, frightening
• Still hurting, brought to tears
• Want to repair council relationship with staff, with veterans on staff
• Lessons to learn from crisis management, and having one voice
• Concerned about effect on St. Louis Park’s communities of color and they may be
feeling blame for this situation
Mr. Morrell, consultant facilitated the discussion with council on possible opportunities and
action steps. This included communication and crisis management training, council norms,
agenda process, slowing down and looking at various implications and impact, considerations
regarding our own residents, messaging and media, legal considerations and what could
happen in the future with a higher-level crisis.
Mr. Morrell stated the actions that will come from this discussion include:
• Staff will outline a city crisis communication process and report back to council
• The council will revisit and discuss norms
• A table top exercise will occur with a scenario related to crisis communication and how
council will react
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 3c) Page 3
Title: Study session minutes of November 25, 2019
The council members stated they want to earn trust and respect back from staff, which will
take time.
Mr. Harmening stated the one good thing that came of the issue is that staff learned about and
prepared for keeping staff, council, and the public as safe as possible, especially when emotions
are running high.
Council was in agreement with the summary provided by Mr. Morrell on the three actions listed
above. Staff will work on those areas and get time set aside on council agenda as next steps.
The meeting adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Written Reports provided and documented for recording purposes only:
3. Community survey
4. Snow and ice control policy update
5. Oct. 2019 monthly financial report
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Jake Spano, mayor
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4a
Executive summary
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Recommended action: Motion to approve the second reading and adopt Ordinance amending
chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park code of ordinances relating to the zoning map and to publish the
revised official zoning map.
Policy consideration: Does the council support rezoning the properties from C-2 to C-1?
Summary: On February 20, 2018, the city council directed staff to consider options for limiting
the size of businesses within commercial districts. Since then, staff conducted several
discussions in study session with the planning commission and city council which resulted in the
following steps to be taken:
1. Rezoned several properties to be consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This step
was completed on August 19, 2019.
2. Amended the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district to establish maximum size limits for
retail and service uses. This amendment was completed on September 16, 2019.
3. Rezone 87 properties from the C-2 General Commercial district to the C-1 Neighborhood
Commercial district. This is the subject of this proposed action.
Public process: On December 2, 2019, the city council unanimously approved the first reading.
Prior to this, the following steps were taken as part of the rezoning process:
1. Planning commission conducted a study session on October 16, 2019. They reviewed the
subject properties and agreed with including them in the process.
2. Neighborhood meeting was held on November 7, 2019. Owners of the subject properties,
and property owners within 350 feet of the subject properties were notified of the
proposed action.
3. The planning commission held a public hearing on November 20, 2019. Comments were
received. The planning commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the
ordinance.
Financial or budget considerations: None.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Ordinance
Property exhibits
Property owner letters
Excerpt of planning commission minutes
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, assistant zoning administrator
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 2
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Discussion
Background: On February 20, 2018, the city council directed staff to consider options for
limiting the size of businesses within commercial districts. The intent is to avoid big box and
junior box stores in certain areas where they would be out of scale with the surrounding
neighborhood, and to promote smaller businesses. Since then, staff conducted several
discussions in study session with the planning commission and city council which resulted in the
following steps to be taken:
1. Rezone several properties from the C-2 General Commercial district to another zoning
district to be consistent with the approved 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This step was
completed on August 19, 2019.
2. Process an amendment to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district to establish maximum
size limits for retail and service uses. The amendment allows staff to approve retail and
service uses up to 7,500 square feet. It also allows a property to have up to 10,000 square
feet of cumulative retail and service uses. This amendment was completed on September
16, 2019, and it is now in effect.
3. Rezone 87 properties from the C-2 General Commercial district to the C-1 Neighborhood
Commercial district. This is the proposal that is currently under consideration.
Planning commission study session: Staff most recently presented the recommended zoning
map changes to the planning commission in a study session on October 16, 2019. The planning
commission indicated support for staff to hold a neighborhood information meeting regarding
the proposal for all these properties.
Neighborhood meeting: The neighborhood meeting was conducted on November 7, 2019.
Notices were mailed to the subject property owners and to property owners within 350 feet of
the subject properties. People from 23 households and 4 commercial properties attended.
Generally speaking, residents were in favor of the changes, and commercial property owners
asked questions without stating their opinions on the proposal.
Planning commission public hearing: The planning commission conducted a public hearing on
November 20, 2019. Comments were received from several residents surrounding the
commercial areas in support of the rezoning.
Representatives from one commercial property spoke at the hearing, and submitted a letter
objecting to the change for their parcel. A second property owner did not attend, but submitted
a letter objecting to his property being rezoned. Both letters are attached to this report.
Following discussion summarized in the attached draft of the meeting minutes, the planning
commission unanimously recommended approval of the zoning map amendments as proposed.
Zoning Analysis: Below is the purpose of the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial districts and the C-
2 General Commercial districts as stated in the ordinance:
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 3
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district:
The purpose of this C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district is to provide for low-intensity,
service-oriented commercial uses for surrounding residential neighborhoods. Limits will be
placed on the type, size, and intensity of commercial uses in this district to ensure and
protect compatibility with adjacent residential areas.
C-2 General Commercial district.
The purposes of the C-2 General Commercial district are to:
(1) Allow the concentration of general commercial development for convenience of the
public and mutually beneficial relationship to each other in those areas located away
from residential areas designated by the comprehensive plan;
(2) Provide space for community facilities and institutions that appropriately may be
located in commercial areas;
(3) Provide adequate space to meet the needs of modern commercial development,
including off-street parking and truck loading areas;
(4) Minimize traffic congestion; and
(5) Carefully regulate the intensity of commercial development as it refers to both
internal site factors and external impacts.
The properties selected for rezoning to C-1 fit the purpose of the C-1 district.
1. They are directly adjacent to residential properties.
2. They are small properties, generally the lots are 3,000 to 60,000 square feet in area. The
average is approximately 15,000 square feet. There is one property that is 116,000 square
feet.
3. The businesses are small, and with a few exceptions, meet the 10,000 square foot
maximum requirement of the C-1 district.
Legal non-conformities resulting from the change. Staff identified the following non-
conformities that would result from the rezoning:
The C-1 district limits retail and service business size to 10,000 square feet, and would
therefore result in the following non-conformities:
• 7200 Cedar Lake Rd – Walgreens is approximately 11,000 square feet.
• 8225 Highway 7 – Commercial mall corner of Highway 7 and Blake Road is
approximately 19,000 square feet.
• 4320 Excelsior Blvd – Opitz Outlet is approximately 12,000 square feet.
• 4140 Excelsior Blvd – Slumberland is approximately 11,000 square feet.
• 5825 Excelsior Blvd – This building is approximately 61,000 square feet and contains a
mix of uses. It would become legally non-conforming because the cumulative size of the
retail and service tenants exceeds 10,000 square feet. Party City is approximately 12,000
square feet, and Midwest Supplies is approximately 23,000 square feet. Another retail
use would not be permitted in this building unless one of the other retail uses
downsized to accommodate it.
Liquor stores are not permitted in the C-1 district, and would therefore result in the
following non-conforming uses:
• 7924 Highway 7 – Knollwood Liquors.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 4
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
• 8240 Minnetonka Blvd – Texa Tonka Liquors.
Motor vehicle repair is not permitted in the C-1 district, and would therefore result in the
following non-conformities:
• 4200 Excelsior Blvd - Midas.
• 5608 Excelsior Blvd – Autosurf Café.
• 5925 Excelsior Blvd – Youngstedts.
• 8001 Minnetonka Blvd – D & D auto repair.
City code and state statute define the rights of legal non-conformities. In summary, the legal
non-conforming uses would be able to:
1. Continue to operate as is.
2. Perform maintenance on the use and buildings.
3. Improve the use and buildings without increasing the size of the uses.
4. Sell the business. A new owner could continue to operate the business as is.
5. Replace the use with a similar use. For example, an 11,000 square foot shoe store can
be replaced by an 11,000 square foot apparel store.
The legal non-conforming use cannot:
1. Increase in size.
2. Increase in intensity. For example, a non-conforming retail use cannot be replaced by
another retail use that would significantly increase traffic.
3. Return to a previous non-conforming use if the use converts to a use complies with
code. For example:
• If an 11,000 square foot retail use reduces its size to 10,000 square feet, it would not
be able to go back to 11,000 square feet.
• If a liquor store or auto repair use stops operating and is replaced by another use
that meets code, then the liquor store or auto repair shop cannot be re-established
in the future.
Next steps: City staff will publish the revised official zoning map in the official newspaper legal
notices.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 5
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Ordinance No. ___-19
Ordinance amending the St. Louis Park official zoning map
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. The city council has considered the advice and recommendation of the planning
commission (Case No. 19-26-ZA).
Section 2. The St. Louis Park official zoning map is hereby amended by changing the
zoning district boundaries to reclassify the parcels indicated in the attached list.
Section 3. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council December 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
First Reading December 2, 2019
Second Reading December 16, 2019
Date of Publication December 26, 019
Date Ordinance takes effect January 10, 2020
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 6
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Table 1: Proposed list of parcels to be rezoned to C-1
PID ADDRESS 08-117-21 33 0171 2925 TEXAS AVE S
08-117-21 33 0170 2929 TEXAS AVE S
08-117-21 33 0172 2939 TEXAS AVE S
17-117-21 22 0169 3003 TEXAS AVE S
18-117-21 11 0030 3008 TEXAS AVE S
18-117-21 11 0003 3015 UTAH AVE S
06-028-24 43 0083 3701 KIPLING AVE S
06-028-24 43 0084 3705 KIPLING AVE S
06-028-24 43 0085 3711 KIPLING AVE S
21-117-21 23 0015 3937 ALABAMA AVE S south 117 feet
21-117-21 24 0020 3952 WEBSTER AVE S
07-028-24 23 0165 3960 WOODDALE AVE
21-117-21 24 0038 3964 XENWOOD AVE S
21-117-21 24 0039 3970 XENWOOD AVE S
21-117-21 23 0151 3978 ALABAMA AVE S
21-117-21 23 0152 3982 ALABAMA AVE S
21-117-21 23 0153 3986 ALABAMA AVE S
21-117-21 23 0154 3990 ALABAMA AVE S
21-117-21 23 0126 3996 ALABAMA AVE S
21-117-21 24 0205 4015 XENWOOD AVE S
21-117-21 24 0158 4015 YOSEMITE AVE S
21-117-21 24 0157 4019 YOSEMITE AVE S
21-117-21 24 0206 4021 XENWOOD AVE S
21-117-21 23 0157 4046 BROOKSIDE AVE S
21-117-21 32 0109 4054 BROOKSIDE AVE S
06-028-24 41 0008 4100 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 41 0009 4120 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 44 0001 4140 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 44 0176 4170 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 44 0175 4200 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 11 0063 4201 MINNETONKA BLVD
06-028-24 11 0049 4221 MINNETONKA BLVD
06-028-24 43 0013 4300 36 1/2 ST W
06-028-24 43 0017 4300 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 43 0018 4306 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 43 0019 4308 EXCELSIOR BLVD
06-028-24 43 0186 4320 EXCELSIOR BLVD
07-028-24 21 0512 4951 EXCELSIOR BLVD
07-028-24 21 0513 4959 EXCELSIOR BLVD
07-028-24 22 0023 4961 EXCELSIOR BLVD
07-028-24 22 0024 4995 EXCELSIOR BLVD
07-028-24 22 0025 5001 EXCELSIOR BLVD
07-028-24 23 0091 5501 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0019 5600 EXCELSIOR BLVD
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 7
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
21-117-21 24 0202 5608 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0141 5707 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0193 5717 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0040 5720 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0161 5801 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0066 5804 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0208 5809 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0067 5810 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0209 5813 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0185 5825 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0083 5900 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0196 5911 EXCELSIOR BLVD North 225 feet
21-117-21 24 0201 5912 EXCELSIOR BLVD south 117 feet
21-117-21 24 0207 5915 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0156 5916 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0010 5922 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 24 0195 5925 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0011 5930 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0097 6001 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0127 6002 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0128 6006 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0100 6011 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0155 6100 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 32 0006 6111 EXCELSIOR BLVD
21-117-21 23 0130 6112 EXCELSIOR BLVD
08-117-21 13 0134 7120 CEDAR LAKE RD
08-117-21 24 0003 2262 LOUISIANA AVE S
08-117-21 24 0065 7200 CEDAR LAKE RD
17-117-21 33 0172 7900 STATE HWY NO 7
17-117-21 22 0161 7915 MINNETONKA BLVD
08-117-21 33 0173 7916 MINNETONKA BLVD
17-117-21 22 0170 7921 MINNETONKA BLVD
17-117-21 33 0173 7924 STATE HWY NO 7
18-117-21 11 0028 8001 MINNETONKA BLVD
18-117-21 11 0029 8011 MINNETONKA BLVD
18-117-21 11 0004 8015 MINNETONKA BLVD
18-117-21 11 0005 8105 MINNETONKA BLVD
07-117-21 44 0018 8200 MINNETONKA BLVD
46 18-117-21 44 0007 8215 STATE HWY NO 7
18-117-21 44 0013 8225 STATE HWY NO 7
07-117-21 44 0019 8240 MINNETONKA BLVD
07-117-21 44 0102 8300 MINNETONKA BLVD
The public right-of-way currently zoned C-2 roughly measured as extending 182 feet north of Mtka
Blvd between Hwy 100 and Vernon Ave S
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 8
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 9
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 10
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 11
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 12
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 13
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 14
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 15
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 16
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 17
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Kil-Ben Excelsior, LLC
Robert L. Brackey
80 Arlington Avenue E,
St. Paul, Minnesota 55117
Email: rlbbracs@aol.com
Telephone: 651-488-6113 Fax : 651-489-1405
=============================================================================
November 25, 2019
Gary Morrison, Assistants Zoning Administrator
Sean Walther, Planning and Zoning Supervisor
City of St Louis Park
St. Louis Park, MN
Re: In the matter of 5825 Excelsior Blvd as Affected by the Plan of
Rezoning C-2 General Commercial properties to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial
Case Number: 19-26-ZA
Dear Gary and Sean:
Thank you for meeting my representatives this morning to discuss the above captioned matter.
I am the President of Kil Ben Excelsior LLC, which owns 5825 Excelsior Boulevard, one of the 78
properties included in the rezoning plan referenced above. (For ease of reference, I will sometimes
refer to our property as “5825”).
I am writing to you to express our support of the plan to rezone 77 of the properties from C-2 to C-1 and
to express my request to you to recommend to the City Council at the Public Hearing on December 2nd
that they withdraw 5825 Excelsior from their approval of the rezoning plan until the City Council, the
planning staff, and we have been able to study the full impact of the rezoning proposal on our
property.
In your summary of the rezoning plan, you stated that the “intent” of the plan is to “avoid big box and
junior box stores in certain areas where they would be out of scale with the surrounding neighborhood,
and to promote smaller businesses.”
Your summary also states the “purposes” of a C-1 neighborhood commercial district:
“… to provide for low-intensity, service oriented commercial uses for surrounding residential
neighborhoods. Limits will be placed on the type, size and intensity of commercial uses in this
district to ensure and protect compatibility with adjacent residential areas.”
We believe that the intent and purpose of the rezoning plan fits all the properties to be rezoned except
5825 Excelsior.
First, the intent of the rezoning plan will not avoid big box and junior box stores at 5825 because 5825 is
already there. Rezoning this property will not transform this property – 61,000 square feet of building
space on 116,000 square feet of land – into the small retail shops and low intensity uses serving the
surrounding residential neighborhoods that the rezoning plan envisions.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 18
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Second, the purpose of the C-1 district properties may fit the other 77 properties selected to be rezoned
but they don’t fit 5825. Your summary of the plan makes this clear in describing the criteria you used to
select the properties to be rezoned:
1. They are directly adjacent to residential properties.
2. They are small properties, generally the lots are 3,000 to 60,000 square feet in area. The
average is approximately 15,000 square feet. There is one property that is 116,000 square feet.
3. The businesses are small, and with few exceptions, meet the 10,000 square foot maximum
requirement of the C-1 district.
None of these criteria fit 5825.
More significantly, the low intensity service oriented commercial uses serving the surrounding
neighborhoods from this building will not happen. Not now, not in the future. What will happen to this
property? Large 20,000 square foot –plus users in an office-warehouse- showroom building like this are
very hard to find. We may very well see vacancies of a year or more when the terms of the current
tenants expire in a few years.
The grandfather rules – the legal nonconforming use protection - will not apply if the current tenants
leave and new tenants needing the same amount of space for the same or similar purpose cannot be
found within a year.
What happens to this property then? A large, white elephant, the best looking building on this portion of
Excelsior Boulevard will be sitting empty, or with scattered small space users, which will not make the
property financially viable.
Third, in deciding whether the property is “out of scale” with the surrounding neighborhoods, we
should take a look at the surrounding residential neighborhoods. We enclose photographs depicting the
view from inside of the building to the surrounding neighborhoods on the north, on the east, and the
south, and the west.
What do all these photographs have in common? No “surrounding residential neighborhoods” are even
visible. What we see are gas stations, a restaurant and bar, and railroad tracks over which trains pass 3
to 5 times per day. We believe it is safe to say that none of the areas surrounding 5825 will go away with
rezoning.
Significantly, no member of the public objected at the planning commission’s public hearing about our
request to remove our property from the rezoning proposal; in today’s meeting, we understood you to
say that we have been a responsible property owner for the 25 years we have owned the property.
If you eliminate the uses available under C-2 but that are prohibited under C-1, both as to size and use,
coupled with the likely loss of the grandfather protection because of the difficulty of finding future
tenants needing the same amount of space and with the same or similar use is nearly insurmountable.
The City will have effectively reduced the market for leasing the property by an as yet unquantifiable
amount, which will consequently reduce the sale value of the property by an as yet unquantified
amount, but which will almost certainly reach into the millions.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 19
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
In short, the city rezoning plan may be good for the other properties dissimilar to 5825 but it will be bad
for this property owner, does not serve the intent or purpose of the rezoning plan and will have a
devastating impact on the property value.
We are aware that the planning commission had only a few minutes to hear our concerns at its public
hearing before it made its recommendation to the City Council for approving the plan, so we respectfully
request the City Council to temporarily remove 5825 from the rezoning plan until we have had an
opportunity to more thoroughly review whether 5825 Excelsior serves the intent and purpose of the
rezoning plan.
Sincerely,
KIL BEN EXCELSIOR, LLC
Robert Brackey, President.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 20
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 21
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 22
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 23
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 24
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 25
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 26
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
EXCERPT OF UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
November 20, 2019 – 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Beneke, Lynette Dumalag, Matt Eckholm, Courtney Erwin,
Claudia Johnston-Madison, Jessica Kraft, Carl Robertson.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Gary Morrison, Sean Walther
3. Public Hearings
A. Rezoning C-2 General Commercial properties to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial
Applicant: City of St. Louis Park
Case Nos: 19-26-ZA
Gary Morrison, assistant zoning administrator, presented the staff report.
The proposed rezoning is the final step taken with the intent of preserving and
encouraging small businesses in neighborhood settings. Earlier this year the council
rezoned several properties to be consistent with the comprehensive plan. That rezoning
was followed-up with a text amendment to the C-1 Neighborhood Commercial district
to limit the size of retail and service establishments. The proposed rezoning of
properties to the C-1 district is now proposed with the C-1 text amendment in place.
Mr. Morrison showed slides of Cedar Lake Road/Louisiana Area, the Texa-Tonka area,
Knollwood Mall Area, several areas along Excelsior Blvd. and Hwy. 100 and Minnetonka
Blvd., all of which are proposed to change to C-1 Neighborhood Commercial.
Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing.
Jim McGovern, representing the owner of 5825 Excelsior Blvd, commercial advisor,
stated they do not oppose the rezoning plan, but oppose rezoning 5825 Excelsior Blvd.
He stated this does not fit the intent or the purpose of the rezoning related to big box
stores. He added the purpose of the rezoning is not appropriate for this building, stating
there will not be small shops within the building. Mr. McGovern added even with
grandfathering the property in - it is difficult to find tenants that will use 75,000 square
feet when their leases run out, and several are about to run out soon. He asked that this
property be excluded from the rezoning plan.
Tom Goodrum, Loucks Consulting, stated he is representing 5825 Excelsior Blvd as well.
He stated this is difficult to deal with in making this C-1, adding not a lot of uses transfer
over from C2 to C1, and especially as it relates to tenants or proposed tenants that
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 27
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
might use this space. He stated this building does not fit the small retail building
purpose, adding it has residential behind it. He asked if the commission could take more
time to review this property. He added land uses can work together, but asked for
further review by the commission on this issue.
Brian Alton, 951 Grand Ave, St. Paul, MN 55105, stated he is representing the 5825
Excelsior Blvd property also. He stated this would have a devastating effect on the
property itself. He stated it is a unique parcel and on a busy street, near a railroad, built
well with large tenants and large spaces. He stated C-1 is not appropriate use for this
property. He added this is a restriction of good uses of properties such as this one. He
stated this is also inconsistent with the city’s comprehensive plan.
Andrew Hoffer, 3966 Alabama Ave, stated they like the way the commission is planning
the neighborhood, adding this is a very good way to maintain the integrity of their
neighborhood. He stated the residential neighborhood supports the commission’s
decision.
Larry Lessley, 2965 Brunswick Ave, stated this is a great move for the neighborhood. He
stated they are all for progress, and the development must fit the neighborhood. He
added they are supportive of the plan.
Chris Kasic, 3916 Colorado Ave, stated he is also in favor of the rezoning, and agrees
with the previous two speakers. He stated this fits well with the neighborhood as well,
adding this will help to not have large buildings built in this neighborhood area.
Susan Bloomgren, 3961 Brunswick Ave, stated she is also in support of the rezoning and
appreciates keeping the small neighborhood feel alive while also progressing and
developing the area.
Barb Castagna, 6002 Excelsior Blvd, she supports this and also owns Educational
Outfitters, noting her biggest concern is safety for children as they shop for their school
uniforms. She stated 50% of her business is done between July and Labor Day, and she is
concerned about parking near the business, and that it be safe for all who shop at this
store.
The Chair closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison referred to the Party City building and asked staff for
clarification on the owner’s ability to lease the building.
Mr. Morrison stated the zoning refers to retail, and not to restaurants, showrooms,
banks, offices, indoor entertainment. He noted there are several uses that could go into
the building. Mr. Morrison added staff can work with the owners on the issues of
concern.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison asked about resale of the building, and if the space
leased can be continued.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 28
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Mr. Morrison stated the building and businesses can be sold and operated in the same
manner as they currently are. Non-conformities can continue as is, and they can be
replaced by a similar type use and similar size as what is in there currently.
Commissioner Robertson stated this is the first time the commission is hearing about
the 5825 Excelsior Ave. building issue. He stated he does not see a negative impact on
the building to rezone it, but added he is not the owner of the building. He stated this
could have been discussed further at study sessions.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison asked if later this building is sold to a different
developer who may want high density development, how it would be impacted, also in
light of the Brookside neighborhood, and what could be redeveloped there in a C-1
zone.
Commissioner Robertson stated this feels a bit awkward if it’s the only building zoned C-
2 within the C-1 district. He hopes the owner of the property has had an opportunity to
discuss this.
Chair Eckholm asked if this property could be removed from the zoning for further
discussion.
Mr. Walther stated action on this parcel could be tabled this evening and come back at a
later date for discussion and decision, and also re-opening the public hearing specific to
this parcel, or move it along with notes, or hold up the vote as a whole.
Mr. Walther added this was going to move to city council at the December 2 meeting for
a first reading.
Commissioner Robertson and Commissioner Johnston-Madison stated they would like
to move this forward to vote and then have council review in December.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison added if the council were to pull this building out for
further consideration, she recommends the neighborhood impacted would be involved
in future discussions and meetings.
Commissioner Beneke asked how far the non-conforming goes. Can they tear down the
building and re-build it, can they rearrange interior walls? What is allowed.
Mr. Morrison stated the building could be rebuilt if destroyed or torn down. It would
have to be re-built to the same dimensions and cannot be made more non-conforming.
Commissioner Erwin noted the 5825 building concerns about the ability to lease it in the
future, were addressed in that it can still utilized it in the same way without any further
hindering of the building.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4a) Page 29
Title: Second reading of ordinance rezoning C-2 parcels to C-1
Commissioner Dumalag stated the commission needs to look forward related to
development within the city, she hopes the owners work with the city staff on future
uses of the building, especially as leases roll over.
Commissioner Robertson made a motion, Commissioner Dumalag seconded,
recommending approval of the rezoning C-2 General Commercial properties to C-1
Neighborhood Commercial.
The motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
Mr. Walther stated this will come before the council at the December 2 meeting for first
reading and review.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4b
Executive summary
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance amending Section
36-361 pertaining to off-street parking and to approve the summary ordinance for publication.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to amend Section 36-361 to establish parking
regulations for the Historic Walker Lake area and additional city-wide parking regulations?
Summary: The amendment to the parking ordinance would create regulations specific to
Historic Walker Lake and establish additional regulations that apply to all properties in the city.
This change further supports the goal of reuse and revitalization of the existing buildings in the
district. The proposed parking regulations would:
1.Remove minimum parking requirements for any uses occupying an existing building.
2.Require a minimum and maximum number of parking spaces for new construction and
building expansions.
3.Require properties to maintain the number of existing on-site parking spaces.
The regulations were presented to the Historic Walker Lake business association on two
separate occasions. Both times they expressed their support of the ordinance.
The proposed ordinance also includes regulations that apply to all properties in the city,
including the Historic Walker Lake area. The intent is to ensure parking lots are being utilized
for customer and employee parking as required by code. These provisions require parking lots
to be used in a safe manner and as intended by the parking section of the zoning ordinance.
1.Prohibit using drive aisles and driveways for any purpose that prevents vehicle access to
parking spaces or inhibit emergency service response.
2.Require all parking spaces open directly to an aisle or driveway so that the use of the spaces
will be unimpeded.
3.Require parking spaces be marked with painted lines, or similar markings.
The planning commission held a public hearing on November 20, 2019. No comments were
received. The commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the ordinance.
The city council approved the first reading on December 2, 2019.
Financial or budget considerations: None.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Discussion, ordinance, summary ordinance for publication, excerpt of
planning commission minutes
Prepared by: Gary Morrison, assistant zoning administrator
Reviewed by: Sean Walther, planning and zoning supervisor
Karen Barton, community development director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 2
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Discussion
Background: The proposed regulations specific to the Historic Walker Lake area have been part
of the discussions with area businesses, the city council and planning commission, and are an
important component to implementation of the Historic Walker Lake small area plan. This change
further supports the goal of reuse and revitalization of the existing buildings in the district.
While the branding and planning for Historic Walker Lake have already resulted in significant
public and private improvements and investments in the area, work continues on the
development of a new zoning district that will further implement the recommendations of the
Historic Walker Lake small area plan. It is anticipated that the ordinance will be completed in
the second quarter of 2020.
Updating parking regulations, however, continues to be an immediate need. Therefore, staff
propose to proceed with a parking ordinance first. Land use regulations and other performance
standards will follow. The new parking regulations could be adopted by the end of the year.
Zoning analysis: The proposed Historic Walker lake parking regulations would:
1.Remove minimum parking requirements for any uses occupying an existing building.
If approved, Historic Walker Lake would be the first area in the city to have no minimum
parking requirements for existing buildings. This regulation would allow uses to occupy an
existing building without having to meet a minimum requirement for number of parking
spaces. The use would still have to meet all other relevant code requirements including
zoning, building and health codes.
The ability to remove the minimum parking requirements is unique to the Historic Walker
Lake area because of the availability of on-street parking and municipal parking lots located
within Historic Walker Lake.
2.Require a minimum and maximum number of parking spaces for new construction and
building expansions.
a.A new table would establish minimum parking requirements for uses located in the
area. The availability of public parking in the area supports the minimum number of
required off-street parking to be less than the city would require for similar uses located
elsewhere in the city.
b.The new table would also establish the maximum number of parking spaces allowed for
certain uses. This provision reduces the potential size of parking lots, encouraging
businesses to, in part, rely on the available public parking and promote alternate modes
of transportation.
3.Require properties to maintain the number of existing parking spaces. The number of
parking spaces that exist when this ordinance is adopted cannot be reduced. The reduction
in required parking is made possible in this area because of the availability of public and
private parking spaces. Therefore, the ordinance prohibits the reduction of existing on-site
parking spaces. The spaces can be relocated or replaced in a permanent manner that meets
code, such as permanent easement over spaces on another property, but the number of
spaces cannot be reduced.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 3
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
The proposed ordinance also includes regulations that apply to all properties in the city,
including the Historic Walker Lake area. The intent is to ensure parking lots are being utilized
for customer and employee parking as required by code. The following new provisions help to
enforce parking lots to be used in a safe manner and as intended by the parking section of the
zoning ordinance.
1.Prohibit using drive aisles and driveways for any purpose that prevents vehicle access to
parking spaces or inhibits emergency service response.
2.Require parking spaces to open directly to an aisle or driveway so that the use of the spaces
will be unimpeded.
3.Require off-street parking spaces be marked with painted lines or similar markings.
Next steps: City staff will publish the summary ordinance in the official newspaper.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 4
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Ordinance No. ___-19
An ordinance regarding parking standards
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. Chapter 36 of the St. Louis Park City Code is hereby amended by adding
underscored text and deleting the strikethrough text. Section breaks are represented by ***.
Sec. 36-361. Off-street parking areas, paved areas, and loading spaces.
***
(c) Required quantity.
(1)Parking Spaces.Parking space requirements are established in Table 36-361(a) and (b).
For uses not listed, the off-street parking requirements shall be established by the Zoning
Administrator based upon the characteristics and functional similarities between uses
including, but not limited to: the size of building, type of use, number of employees,
expected volume and turnover of customer traffic, and expected frequency and number
of delivery or service vehicles. For structures containing multiple uses, each shall be
calculated separately. The requirements may be revised upward or downward by the City
Council as part of an application for a Conditional Use Permit or Planned Unit
Development based on verifiable information pertaining to parking.
(21)Required parking spaces must be located on the same lot as the principal use, unless
shared parking or off-site parking is approved for the use.
(32)The number provided for required parking spaces shall be the minimum
requirement, except where otherwise noted. Parking space requirements are as
follows:
(3)Historic Walker Lake District. The boundary of the Historic Walker Lake district is
illustrated in Figure A. The parking minimum and maximum requirements in Table
36-361(b) are applicable to the Historic Walker Lake District instead of those listed in
Table 36-361(a) in the following manner:
a.All new structures or the expansion of an existing structure located in the Historic
Walker Lake District shall be subject to the minimum and maximum parking
requirements specified in Table 36-361(b).
b.Structures on January 10, 2020 are not subject to the minimum and maximum
parking requirements specified in Table 36-361(a) or Table 36-361(b). However,
the number of parking spaces that exist on the property cannot be reduced unless
the parking spaces are relocated to another property in accordance with the
shared parking requirements located within this section.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 5
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Figure A
Table 36-361 (b)
Current Land Use Category Proposed Required Off-Street
Minimum
Proposed Required Off-
Street Maximum
Residential
Multifamily 1 space/dwelling unit 2 spaces/dwelling unit
Elderly Housing 1 space/dwelling unit 2 spaces/dwelling unit
Human Care Uses
Adult day care 1 space/employee on largest shift OR
1 space/500 sq. ft. of GFA, which ever
is largest
1 space/employee on largest
shift OR 1 space/200 sq. ft. of
GFA, which ever is largest
Group day care, nursery
school
1 space/employee on largest shift OR
1 space per 500 sq. ft. of GFA, which
ever is largest
1 space/employee on largest
shift OR 1 space per 200 sq.
ft. of GFA, which ever is
largest
Group homes 1 space/4 beds 1 space per 2 beds
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 6
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Medical or dental office 1 space/500 sq. ft. FA in excess of
4,000 sq. ft. (min. 4 spaces)
1 space/200 sq. ft. FA
Nursing home 1 space/employee on largest shift +1
space/6 beds
1 space/employee on largest
shift plus 1 space/ 3 beds
Institutional Uses
Community center Parking requirement based on uses
within the building.
Parking requirement based
on uses within the building
Libraries, museums, art 1 space/450 sq. ft. floor area in
principal structure.
1 space/ each 300 sq. ft. floor
area in principal structure.
High school and post-
secondary schools
1 space/classroom + 1 space per 5
students of legal driving age based on
the maximum number of students
attending classes at any one time
2 spaces/ classroom + 1
space per 3 students of legal
driving age based on the
maximum number of
students attending classes at
any one (1) time
Commercial Uses
Bank 1 space/250 sq. ft. floor area 1 space/200 sq. ft. floor area
Catering 1 space/500 sq. ft. floor area. 1space/500 sq. ft. floor area.
Coffee Shop 1 space/200 sq. ft. floor area. 1 space/100 sq. ft. floor area.
Food Service or Bakeries 1 space/300 sq. ft. floor area. 1 space /150 sq. ft. floor area
Hotel 1 space/3 guest rooms + parking
equal to 10% of the capacity of
persons for an affiliated use on site
(i.e., dining or meeting rooms)
1 space/guest room +
parking equal to 30% of the
capacity of persons for an
affiliated use on site (i.e.,
dining or meeting rooms)
Offices or medical and
dental labs
1 space/500 sq. ft. FA in excess of
4,000 sq. ft.
1 space/250 sq. ft. FA
Bowling alley 1 space/250 sq. ft. FA 1 space/100 sq. ft. FA
Pool hall or video arcade 1 space/250 sq. ft. FA 1 space/100 sq. ft. FA
Sport/health club, studio,
pool
1 space/500 sq. ft. FA in excess of
4,000 sq. ft. (minimum of 4 spaces)
1 space/ 200 sq. ft. FA
Theatre, auditorium,
assembly halls
1 space/4 attendees 1.5 spaces/4 attendees
Restaurants - fast casual 1 space/300 sq. ft. FA 1 space/75 sq. ft. of FA
Restaurants - standard sit
down
1 space/300 sq. ft. FA 1 space/75 sq. ft. of FA
Brewery/Food Hall 1 space/150 sq. ft. FA 1 space/75 sq. ft. FA
Retail store, grocery, and
service establishment
where > 25% gross floor
area is customer area
1 space/400 sq. ft. floor area. 1 space/400 sq. ft. FA
Retail where < 25% gross
floor area is customer area
1 space/250 sq. ft. floor area. 1 space/150 sq. ft. FA
Studios 1 space per 400 sq. ft. FA 1 sapce per 200 sq. ft. FA
Industrial Uses
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 7
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Manufacturing, fabrication,
or processing
1 space/ employee on largest shift or
1 space/1,200 sq. ft. FA whichever is
greater +1 space/vehicle normally
stored or parked on the site
1 space/500 sq. ft. FA +1
space/ vehicle normally
stored or parked on the site
Showrooms 1 space/500 sq. ft. 1 space/200 sq. ft.
Warehouse 1 space/2 employees on largest shift
or 1 space/ 1,500 sq. ft. FA whichever
is greater
1 space/500 sq. ft. FA
***
(h)Parking Area Use. Required parking spaces and the driveways providing access to them shall
not be utilized for the following:
***
(5)Aisles and driveways shall not be used for any purpose that would for any period of time
prevent vehicle access to parking spaces or inhibit circulation or emergency service
response.
***
(k)Design Requirements
***
PARKING LOT DIMENSIONS
Table 36-361 (bc)
* One-way aisles only.
** When parking is provided within a parking ramp, the total bay width may be reduced to 58
feet.
Stall Angle
(degrees)
Curb Length
(feet)
Vehicle Projection
(feet)
Aisle Width
(feet)
Total Width
(feet)
45 Standard
Compact
12.0
11.5
18.5
17.0
13.0* 50.0
60 Standard
Compact
10.0
9.5
20.0
18.0
15.0* 55.0
75 Standard
Compact
9.0
8.5
20.5
17.5
18.0* 59.0
90*** Standard
Compact
8.5
8.0
18.0
16.0
24.0 60.0**
Parallel Standard
Compact
23.0
21.0
8.5
8.0
22.0 38.0
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 8
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
*** In a C-1 district the minimum aisle width may be reduced to 22.0 feet and a minimum total
width of 58.0 feet, with the condition that aisles less than 24.0 feet wide shall provide a minimum
curb length of 9.0 feet.
***
(12)Each parking space shall open directly to an aisle or driveway. Tandem parking spaces,
however, may be established for:
a. Single-family and two-family residences.
b.Commercial and multiple family residential uses if approved with a parking
management plan and as part of the site plan of a conditional use permit or
planned unit development.
(l)Maintenance. All off-street parking areas shall be maintained in good repair.
(1)All parking areas containing four (4) or more parking spaces or containing angled
parking shall have the parking spaces clearly marked on the pavement, using minimum
four-inch wide painted lines or other marking devices approved by the city engineer.
Such markings shall conform to the approved parking plan and shall be maintained in
a clearly legible condition. No parking facilities shall be marked in a manner that
reduces the number of parking stalls to less than the number required by this zoning
ordinance.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen days after its publication.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council December 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
First Reading December 2, 2019
Second Reading December 16, 2019
Date of Publication December 26, 2019
Date Ordinance takes effect January 10, 2020
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 9
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Summary for publication
Ordinance No. ____-19
An ordinance regarding amendment
to the St. Louis Park zoning ordinance
relating to the parking regulations
This ordinance amends Section 36-361 of the City of St. Louis Park zoning code relating
to parking. It establishes parking regulations for the Historic Walker Lake area and establishes
additional regulations to be applied city wide.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council December 16, 2019
Jake Spano /s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the City Clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: December 26, 2019
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 10
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
EXCERPT OF UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION
ST. LOUIS PARK, MINNESOTA
November 20, 2019 – 6:00 p.m.
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jim Beneke, Lynette Dumalag, Matt Eckholm, Courtney Erwin,
Claudia Johnston-Madison, Jessica Kraft, Carl Robertson.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Gary Morrison, Sean Walther
3.Public Hearings
B.Parking ordinance amendment – Historic Walker Lake
Applicant: City of St. Louis Park
Case Nos: 19-32-ZA
Gary Morrison, assistant zoning administrator, presented the staff report. This ordinance
includes regulations that apply to the Historic Walker Lake area only and regulations that
would apply to the whole city.
Mr. Morrison noted the amendments create regulations for the Historic Walker Lake
area, that require a reduced number of parking spaces for new structures, or expansion
of existing structures. It also waives the minimum parking requirements for existing
buildings. He stated the number of parking spaces that exist on the property cannot be
reduced.
Mr. Morrison noted that the city-wide amendments prohibit the aisles and driveways
from being used for any purpose that would prevent vehicle access to parking spaces or
inhibit circulation or emergency service response. Additionally, parking spaces shall be
open directly to an aisle or driveway, and parking spaces are to be clearly marked using
minimum four-inch wide painted lines as shows on an approved parking plan.
Mr. Morrison stated that staff recommends approval of the noted amendments as
proposed.
Chair Eckholm opened the public hearing.
Chair Eckholm closed the public hearing.
Commissioner Kraft asked about on-street parking and how it is delineated which
business the parking goes to.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4b) Page 11
Title: Second reading Historic Walker Lake parking ordinance
Mr. Morrison stated that the on-street parking spaces are public, and cannot be allocated
to a specific business.
Chair Eckholm stated this is about as good as can be expected in this area, and he is in
support of this.
Commissioner Johnston-Madison also supports this, adding businesses will need to figure
out in the Walker Lake area how to include parking in their business plan, and the
commission will not be able to second guess this going forward.
Commissioner Robertson made a motion, Commissioner Johnston-Madison seconded,
recommending approval of the Parking ordinance amendment – to create parking
standards and miscellaneous parking standards within the Historic Walker Lake area and
the city.
The motion passed on a vote of 7-0.
6.Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 7:00 p.m.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4c
Executive summary
Title: Retirement recognition for Deputy Police Chief Chad Kraayenbrink
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution to recognize Chad Kraayenbrink for his
years of service.
Policy consideration: None at this time.
Summary: City policy states that employees who retire or resign in good standing with over 20
years of service will be presented with a resolution from the mayor, city manager and city
council. Chad has served St Louis Park for over 33 years but has chosen not to be honored with
a presentation and will not be attending the council meeting.
This consent item will officially adopt the resolution that honors Chad for his years of service.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR manager
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4c) Page 2
Title: Retirement recognition for Deputy Police Chief Chad Kraayenbrink
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
recognizing the contributions of and expressing appreciation to
Deputy Police Chief Chad Kraayenbrink
Whereas, Chad Kraayenbrink began his career as a police officer with the City of St. Louis
Park over 33 years ago on April 28, 1986; and
Whereas, Chad served as a school liaison officer from August 17, 1993 to June 12, 1995 at
West Metro Eliot School; and
Whereas, Chad was promoted to the position of sergeant on April 7, 2001, and to
lieutenant on January 1, 2005 where he supervised and led patrol and support services; and
Whereas, Chad was named officer of the year in 2007 as a lieutenant, an honor not typically
awarded to management, due to the high level of trust he had built with staff; and
Whereas, Chad served as interim chief of police from January 1 to March 20, 2017 and was
promoted to deputy chief of police on April 19, 2017; and
Whereas, Chad served as a special weapons and tactics operator for 16 years, two of those
years as the team leader; he also served as a field training officer and union steward; and
Whereas, Chad was instrumental in leading the department’s transition from traditional
policing to community-oriented policing, and received numerous letters of appreciation from
the public, letters of recognition and commendations from the St. Louis Park Police Department
for exemplary service to the department and the public;
Now therefore be it resolved that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
by this resolution and public record, would like to thank Chad Kraayenbrink for his outstanding
contributions and more than 33 years of dedicated service to the City of St. Louis Park and wish
him the best in his retirement.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council December 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4d
Executive summary
Title: Louisiana Ave. bridge replacement – approve plans, specs, and order advertisement for
bids – Project No. 4018-1700
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution approving final plans and specifications,
and authorizing advertisement for bids for Louisiana Avenue Bridge replacement - Project No.
4018-1700.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to continue to pursue the street and bridge
rehabilitation project identified in this report?
Summary: On March 5, 2018, city council approved the preliminary layout for the Louisiana
Avenue bridge replacement project. On July 8, 2019, an update was provided to the city council.
The final plans for this project are complete, and the scope of the city’s project includes:
•Reconstruction of the road/ bridge between Louisiana Circle and Excelsior Boulevard.
•Cycle track bike facility between Louisiana Circle and Excelsior Boulevard.
•Trail construction between Oxford Street and Louisiana Circle.
•Elevating the new bridge over Minnehaha Creek to provide a trail connection under the
bridge. This connection allows bikers and pedestrians to get from the Minnehaha Creek
trail to the Park Nicollet boardwalk under Louisiana Avenue.
•New sidewalk along the west side of Louisiana Avenue between Excelsior Boulevard and
the Minnehaha Creek Trail.
•Street light pole replacement and upgrade to LED fixtures.
•Signal rehabilitation (Louisiana Circle).
•Mill and overlay of Louisiana Circle.
•Watermain replacement between Louisiana Circle and Excelsior Boulevard.
•Stormwater improvements – new piping and infiltration systems.
•Miscellaneous utility rehabilitation.
If approved, construction will begin in March and will be complete by November 2020.
Financial or budget considerations: The engineer’s estimate for this project is $9,356,187. This
project is included in the Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for 2020. Funding will be provided by a
combination of State of Minnesota bridge bonding, Municipal State Aid bonding, utility funds,
pavement management, and general obligation bonds (sidewalks and bikeways).
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution – Advertise to bid
Layout map
March 5, 2018 city council report (pages 155-170)
Prepared by: Joseph Shamla, sr. engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4d) Page 2
Title: Louisiana Ave. bridge replacement – approve plans, specs, and order ad for bid – Proj. No. 4018-1700
Discussion
Background: In 2020, the Louisiana Avenue bridge over Minnehaha Creek is proposed to be
replaced. Included with this project is pavement reconstruction on Louisiana Avenue between
Louisiana Circle and Excelsior Boulevard.
Louisiana Avenue is one of four continuous north/south routes in the city. This road serves
residents, visitors, and the industrial area around Oxford Street and Methodist Hospital. The
average daily traffic on Louisiana Avenue is 13,000 ADT. This road is expected to carry 19,000
ADT by 2038 due to the proximity to the Louisiana Avenue light rail station and other
redevelopment in the area.
Louisiana Avenue is designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) road making it eligible for state
funding (gas tax dollars). State aid funds can be used as long as the street is designed to meet
the minimum state aid standards. This project has been reviewed by MnDOT and meets all of
the standards.
The Louisiana Avenue bridge replacement is a high priority. The city’s bridge engineering firm -
WSB and Associates, Inc. - inspected the bridge in each of the last five years and is
recommending replacement in 2020 due to the condition of the bridge.
The scope of the project includes:
•Reconstruction of the road/ bridge between Louisiana Circle and Excelsior Boulevard.
•Cycle track bike facility between Louisiana Circle and Excelsior Boulevard.
•Trail construction between Oxford Street and Louisiana Circle.
•Elevating the new bridge over Minnehaha Creek to provide a trail connection under the
bridge. This connection allows bikers and pedestrians to get from the Minnehaha Creek
trail to the Park Nicollet boardwalk under Louisiana Avenue.
•New sidewalk on the west side of Louisiana Avenue connecting Excelsior Boulevard to the
Minnehaha Creek Trail.
•Street light pole replacement and upgrade to LED fixtures.
•Signal rehabilitation (Louisiana Circle).
•Mill and overlay of Louisiana Circle.
•Watermain replacement between Louisiana Circle and Excelsior Boulevard.
•Stormwater improvements – new piping and infiltration systems.
•Miscellaneous utility rehabilitation.
Financial or budget considerations: The following table outlines the estimated project cost and
anticipated funding sources for this project.
CIP Expenditures CIP
Engineer's
Estimate
Right of way / land
acquisition $200,000 $180,000
Construction $7,329,900 $7,395,000
Engineering / administration $1,832,475 $1,781,187
Total $9,362,375 $9,356,187
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4d) Page 3
Title: Louisiana Ave. bridge replacement – approve plans, specs, and order ad for bid – Proj. No. 4018-1700
CIP Funding Sources CIP 2020 Funding
GO Bonds $2,140,300 $2,148,862
Municipal State Aid (MSA) $5,491,792 $5,730,506
Pavement management $38,144 $36,618
MN bridge bonding $1,050,000 $800,000
Stormwater $320,539 $331,465
Water $321,600 $308,736
Total $9,362,375 $9,356,187
The CIP for this project included $1,050,000 of costs eligible for State of MN bridge bonding.
However, due to limited funding available at the state, we only received $800,000. MSA funds
will be used to fill in the gap in funding. State aid bonds will be issued to fund the Municipal
State Aid portion of this project.
Next steps: The proposed schedule for the project to facilitate construction completion in 2020
is as follows:
Council awards construction bids February 3, 2020
Construction March to November 2020
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4d) Page 4
Title: Louisiana Ave. bridge replacement – approve plans, specs, and order ad for bid – Proj. No. 4018-1700
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution approving final plans and specifications
and authorizing advertisement for bids for
Louisiana Avenue Bridge Replacement
Project No. 4018-1700
Whereas, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the
Project Manager related to the Louisiana Avenue Bridge Reconstruction Project - Project No.
4018-1700 on Dec. 16, 2019.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
1.The final plans and specifications to construct these improvements, as prepared under the
direction of the Project Manager, or designee, are approved.
2.The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted at least two weeks in the official City
newspaper and in relevant industry publications an advertisement for bids for the making of
said improvements under said-approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall
appear not less than 10 days prior to the date and time bids will be received electronically
by the Project Manager and accompanied by a bid bond payable to the City for five (5)
percent of the amount of the bid. The electronic bids will only be available to view after the
bids are closed and the City receives the passcode from the bidding host site.
3.The Project Manager, or designee, shall report the receipt of bids to the City Council shortly
after the opening date. The report shall include a tabulation of the bid results and a
recommendation to the City Council.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
fofofofofo
foeefofofofofofofofoeeee eeeeeeeeeeeefofofott
t t t t t
t
t ttvt
v t v
t v
t v
t veeee
e
e
e
e
e
eeeeefofofofofottttttttttttttttt
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
t
e
e e e e
e
e
e
eeeeeettttttttttttte
e ee
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeefofofofofo
fo
fo
fo fofofofoohfocbtctt
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4d)
Title: Louisiana Ave. bridge replacement – approve plans, specs, and order advertisement for bids – Project No. 4018-1700 Page 5
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4e
Executive summary
Title: Second reading prohibiting parking from 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. for city hall east lot
Recommended action: Motion to approve second reading and adopt Ordinance prohibiting
parking in city hall east lot and approve summary ordinance for publication.
Policy consideration: Does the council support amending city code section 30-162 prohibiting
overnight parking in the shared lot with Menorah Plaza and Park Theater Place to the east of
city hall.
Summary: The parking lot to the east of city hall is collectively owned by three different
properties. Although the city’s portion of the lot doesn’t include the driveway access to
Minnetonka Blvd., an easement is in place that provides access and multiple use of the lot. In
exchange, the city assumed full responsibility for maintenance of the lot many years ago,
including snow plowing.
During the past years, it has been difficult to properly and efficiently remove snow due to an
increasing number of randomly parked cars in the lot. The 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. no parking
time frame is consistent with other public lots and allows operations to clear snow before the
start of business. City staff will post appropriate signage at the lot entrance when the ordinance
becomes effective.
Publication of the summary ordinance will occur December 26, 2019 and the effective date for
the ordinance is specified as January 10, 2020.
Financial or budget considerations: None
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Ordinance
Summary ordinance for publication
Prepared by: Rutager West, facilities manager
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, director of building and energy
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4e) Page 2
Title: Second reading prohibiting parking from 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. for city hall east lot
Ordinance No. ____-19
An ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 30
to prohibit overnight parking in certain parking lots
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. St. Louis Park city code chapter 30 is adding the following section 30-162:
Sec. 30-162. Prohibition on overnight parking in certain parking lots.
No person shall park a vehicle or permit a vehicle to remain parked between the hours
of 2:00 a.m. and 6:00 a.m. in the parking lot the location of which is legally described as follows:
The West 95.00 feet of Lot 1, Block 1 C.H.S.C. Addition.
AND
The West 75.00 feet of the East 325.00 feet of the South 175.00 feet of the North
225.00 feet of that part of the West 5/8 of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest
Quarter Section 6, Township 28, Range 24, Hennepin County, Minnesota, lying North of
the South line of West 31st Street extended westerly.
Section 2. This ordinance shall take effect fifteen (15) days after passage and publication.
Adopted this 16th day of December, 2019, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park.
First Reading December 2, 2019
Second Reading December 16, 2019
Date of Publication December 26, 2019
Date Ordinance takes effect January 10, 2020
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council December 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4e) Page 3
Title: Second reading prohibiting parking from 2 a.m. to 6 a.m. for city hall east lot
Summary for publication
Ordinance No. ___-19
An ordinance amending St. Louis Park city code chapter 30
to prohibit overnight parking in certain parking lots
This ordinance prohibits parking in the east city hall parking lot between the hours of 2 a.m. and 6
a.m.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Jake Spano/s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: Dec. 26, 2019
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4f
Executive summary
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
Recommended action: Motion to approve the 2020 Neighborhood Grants.
Policy consideration: Does Council wish to approve the allocation of neighborhood grants for
2020?
Summary: Each year grant funding is made available to neighborhood associations to promote
strong neighborhoods and enhance community connections by bringing neighbors together.
Grant applications from 23 neighborhoods were received in this year’s grant cycle. On
Wednesday, December 4th, Darius Gray facilitated the grant review process with the Racial
Equity and Inclusion and Community Engagement Division. The Grant Review Committee met
to review the grant applications and make funding recommendations to the City Council.
Attached are the grant guidelines that include a rubric for scoring which the Grant Review
Committee used when evaluating and scoring the submissions.
Financial or budget considerations: The Grant Review Committee recommends approval of
$46,650 to fund 23 neighborhood grants for the 2020 grant cycle.
The total amount includes special funding request totaling $5,655. The Grant Review Committee
recommends the approval of $5,655 to fund the special funding for 21 neighborhoods. Special
funding is derived from projects that work towards racial equity and environmentalism.
The Grant Review Committee recommends the approval of $5,650 to fund insurance purchases
for thirteen neighborhoods.
Strategic priority consideration:
•St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create
a more just and inclusive community for all.
•St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship
•St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through
community engagement.
Supporting documents: Discussion
2020 Neighborhood Grant Guidelines
2020 Neighborhood Grant Worksheet
Summary of grant changes for the 2019 grant cycle
Prepared by: Darius Gray, community organizer
Reviewed by: Alicia Sojourner, racial equity manager
Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 2
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
Discussion
Background: Each year grant funding is made available to neighborhood associations to
promote strong neighborhoods and enhance community connections by bringing neighbors
together. The City Council appropriated $52,000 in grant funds for the 2020 neighborhood
grant program. This is the second year that new changes were implemented into to the grant
program to ensure the grant was inclusive and aligned with city priorities of all communities.
These changes will be outlined later in this report and 2019 changes are included in an attached
document.
Neighborhood Associations are responsible for providing insurance when planning
neighborhood events in parks that bring outside equipment into the park such as, but not
limited to, moonwalks, petting zoos, etc. Neighborhood associations can apply for a maximum
of $500 in addition to the standard grant to assist with purchasing insurance.
•Grant applications from 23 neighborhoods were received by November 24, 2019.
•The total grant request for 2020 was $46,650, and the review committee is
recommending the allocation of this amount to the requesting neighborhoods.
Of the applications received:
o 13 of these neighborhoods also included additional insurance reimbursements.
o 21 neighborhoods also included special funding.
Twenty also included the environmental funding totaling $3,155.
Ten also included the racial equity funding totaling $2,500.
In the past year, a few neighborhoods have become more active and are planning more events
and activities for their neighborhood. There are some neighborhoods that have been stagnant
or declined in activity and did not apply for as much funding compared to previous years.
Outside of those exceptions, most neighborhoods have been active and utilize all or a majority
of the grant money provided. The grant applications came in $5,350 under budget. The
committee did an excellent job evaluating each grant against the grant guidelines and scoring
criteria. In doing so, they met the goal of the grant program which is to support neighborhoods
and enhance community connections by bringing neighbors together.
Once approved, there will be $5,350 remaining in the grant fund. This excess funding is intended
to be used with the Neighborhood Start Up Grant.
Below is the total each neighborhood has requested and is recommended to receive from the
review committee:
$1500 Aquila $2950 Birchwood $1960 Blackstone
$1600 Bronx Park $1580 Brooklawns $2125 Brookside
$2950 Browndale $2750 Cedar Manor $1750 Cobblecrest
$2700 Creekside $1025 Crestview $1250 Eliot View
$2950 Elmwood $1040 Kilmer Pond $1000 Lake Forest
$2200 Minikahda Oaks $1975 Minikahda Vista $2450 Minnehaha
$2450 Sorensen $525 South Oak Hill $2950 Texa-Tonka
$2250 Westwood Hills $2800 Wolfe Park
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 3
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
2020 Grant process change: The only change to the grant program for the 2020 cycle is the
change of the grant term. In the past the grant term had its own fiscal year from April 30th to
May 1st of the following year. For example, for the 2017/2018 grant cycle, the grant term was
May 1st, 2017 to April 30th, 2018. The grant terms would span two calendar years. This change
now is to bring the grant term in alignment with a traditional calendar year. The grant cycle will
begin January 1st of each year and come to completion December 31st of each year.
Next steps: Neighborhoods will be notified of grant awards in the week of December 16th
pending the approval of grants by City Council. Following award notice, each neighborhood
must sign contracts and submit them back to the City’s Community Organizer before they may
begin using funds from their 2020 grants.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 4
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
NEIGHBORHOOD REVITALIZATION PROGRAM
2020 GRANT GUIDELINES
Purpose
In 1996, the City of St. Louis Park established this grant program to support neighborhoods and enhance
community connections by bringing neighbors together. Financial support is provided for special
projects initiated by neighbors to address issues, implement ideas or create opportunities that are
meaningful and important to their neighborhoods. This purpose still applies today and supports the
city’s Strategic Priority: St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital
through community engagement. In 2020, the city expects to award up to $52,000 in grants.
Grant Term
The grant term will be January 1st, 2020 to December 31st, 2020. Reimbursement can be issued for cost
incurred within the grant term. All work must be completed within this timeframe. The last invoice
should be submitted no later than January 17th, 2021. Applications are due Sunday, November 24,
2019.
Who We Fund
Eligible applicants include organized St. Louis Park Neighborhood Associations recognized as a
neighborhood association. To be recognized as a neighborhood association, you must demonstrate the
following: Have at least three elected officers from the neighborhood, have a method of transferring
leadership from one year to the next, written bylaws approved by its membership, which must be
reviewed annually, and hold an annual neighborhood meeting.
Projects should be the idea of, and championed by, residents of the neighborhood area with input from
residents.
What We Fund
Creative community projects that focus on the following criteria will be considered for funding:
•Enhances the aesthetics of the neighborhood.
•Provides a clear community benefit.
•Accessible to all members of the community.
•Addresses a known neighborhood deficiency.
•Strengthens existing community assets
•Increases sense of community.
•Activates community improvements or spaces.
•Focuses on community involvement.
•Helps inform neighborhood or city projects.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 5
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
Special Funding
Special grant funding is strictly for the use of environment, racial equity and inclusion, and insurance.
Funds cannot be used for any other reimbursement.
Environmental: Neighborhood Associations may apply for additional grant funding up to $200 that
incorporate an environmental component either in conjunction with an existing event or adding a new
program/event. This new grant element ties to the Strategic Priorities: St. Louis Park is committed to
continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
Racial Equity and Inclusion: Neighborhood Associations may apply for additional grant funding up to
$250 that incorporate a racial equity and inclusion component either in conjunction with an existing
event or adding a new program/event. This new grant element is tied to the Strategic Priorities: St.
Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just
and inclusive community for all.
Insurance: Neighborhood Associations may apply for additional grant funding up to $500 to assist with
purchasing additional insurance.
Note: When planning neighborhood events in parks, you may be required to make provisions to use
your own insurance. Neighborhood associations are responsible for providing outside insurance when
planning neighborhood events in parks that bring outside equipment into the park such as, but not
limited to, moonwalks, petting zoos, etc. Without clear delineation of who is responsible in case of
accidents, neighborhood leaders may be held liable.
Matching Grant Funds
To qualify for a grant, a neighborhood must demonstrate how it will contribute to or leverage the
Neighborhood Revitalization grant funds. A match of neighborhood resources maximizes the use of
limited City funds and confirms the commitment from each neighborhood. Neighborhoods should
provide at least a 50% (dollar for dollar) match to the grant amount. However, applicants that
demonstrate a 100% match will score better. Any combination of sources is acceptable in calculating the
neighborhood match. These can be in the form of:
•cash raised through fundraising •fees collected at activities
•donations from businesses, civic groups, etc. • in-kind services or sweat equity
What are the Grant Program terms and contract requirements?
•The city retains sole discretion in determining whether or not applications are eligible.
•Necessary permits or other approvals must be obtained by the applicant prior to starting projects.
Examples of projects that need permits include but are not limited to, permanent improvements
within the public right-of-way or on private property or activities requiring a street closure.
•Projects must be accessible and inclusive.
•Award maximum is $2,950 per year.
o Grant request maximum amount $2,000
Group activities, social events and meetings are considered for funding up to a
maximum of $700 per activity.
o Environmental request maximum amount $200
o Racial equity and inclusion maximum amount $250
o Insurance maximum amount $500
•Only one Neighborhood Revitalization Grant per neighborhood associations per year.
•Projects may require a design review as a condition of the grant award.
•Projects must be completed within the grant’s calendar year.
•Grants do not carry over from year to year. Previous 2019 grant accounts must be closed by
January 19, 2020 before new grant funds are awarded.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 6
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
How are grants distributed for awarded projects?
•Applicants who are selected (“Grantee”) must sign a contract before implementation of their
project. Contracts can be signed before January 1, 2020.
•Grantees are required to pay for expenses upfront and will be reimbursed by the City.
•Receipts and invoices for project costs must be submitted as proof of expenses.
•Invoices will be processed on the 15th of the month for reimbursement. The last invoice will be
accepted January 17, 2021. The month following the conclusion of the grant term.
•Reimbursement may not exceed total grant award.
•Reimbursement for previous 2019 grant will not be accepted or reimbursed after January 19,
2020.
What are the reporting requirements?
•When submitting an invoice, a status report will be required.
•All grantees will have a mid-grant year in-person/phone meeting with the city’s Community
Organizer.
•Evaluation report along with a complete expense report will be due at end of grant year.
What types of expenses are covered by grant funds?
The city urges neighborhood leaders to think creatively when brainstorming about projects and types of
community involvement. Neighborhood leaders are encouraged to be creative in assessing their needs
and determining the projects they want to undertake as a neighborhood. Neighborhood leaders are
required to include neighborhood resident input for proposed projects. How you choose to receive
this input must be included in the grant application. Projects that demonstrate greater community
input and inclusion will be consider with more favor.
The following types of projects will be favorably considered:
•Neighborhood identity (e.g., brochures, signs, festivals, and education of neighborhood history)
•Neighborhood leadership training and development
•Start-up funds for specific neighborhood projects (e.g., newsletters, emailing services)
•Publicity of special events (e.g., community cleanups)
•Beautification (we will only consider Minnesota-Friendly/bee-friendly planting)
•Social events that bring neighbors together (block party, youth event, art, holiday party)
•Deeping reach and connections with historically underrepresented community members
•Purchasing environmentally friendly products for a neighborhood events
Note: Physical improvements to any public property must be coordinated with the appropriate City
department. It should not conflict with or duplicate a project in the City’s Capital Improvements
Program. A letter of feasibility must be included with a grant application that requests funding for park
improvements. This letter should confirm that the appropriate City department has reviewed the
proposed improvements, that the proposal is feasible, and that the project budget is a reasonable
estimate of project costs. City department contacts for capital improvements: Rick Beane, Parks and
Recreation Department, 952-928-2854.
What types of expenses are NOT covered by grant funds?
•Routine maintenance, i.e. mowing and snow removal.
•General maintenance of public infrastructure (sidewalks, streetlights, alleys, street trees).
•On-going operating expenses, i.e. administration costs, office supplies.
•Payment for services provided by neighborhood residents such as babysitters, attendants (this
should be counted as in-kind services).
•Advertisements for non-neighborhood related events.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 7
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
•Activities that duplicate a city service already in place.
•Improvements to private property, of any kind.
Grant Application Scoring Criteria
The City retains sole discretion in determining how proposed projects, programs and activities meet the
program guidelines and criteria. The nature of proposed projects can vary greatly, therefore the
following scoring criteria are not absolute; rather they are intended to provide guidance for applicants
while preparing their applications and for city staff in scoring them.
1.Scope of Work/Project/Creativity: 0-35 Points
•Defines scope of projects/activities, timeline, goals, process and measurable outcomes.
•Identifies leaders/organizers of project.
•Project timeline.
•Project creativity and innovation.
•Visibility, accessibility and inclusion.
•Identifies future maintenance for permanent improvements, if applicable.
•Defines budget, contributions and/or pledges for the project.
2.Community Benefit: 0-25 Points
•Defines who will benefit from the project and how they will benefit.
•Issue(s) addressed and problem(s) documented.
•Creative and workable solutions.
•Identifies long and/or short term benefits.
3.Neighborhood/Community Participation: 0-25 Points
•Documentation of neighborhood/surrounding residents’ approval of project.
•Neighborhood/resident involvement in all project phases.
•Participation level of residents.
•Strengthens and/or builds new partnerships with other entities or groups.
•Matching funds or in-kind goods/services.
4.Consistency with City Policies, and Adopted Plans: 0-15 Points
•Implements recommendations from or is consistent with City plans.
•Complies with City regulations.
•Understanding of permissions and permits necessary to implement project.
5.Additional Considerations: 0-10 Points
•Projects that include a funding match will receive an additional 5 points.
•Projects that include an environmental component will receive an additional 10 points.
•Projects that include a racial equity and inclusion component will receive an additional 10 points.
Note: We have 28 organized neighborhoods eligible for funds, the process is competitive.
Neighborhood leaders are advised to request funds for their most important needs. During the grant
review process, greater consideration will be given to proposals that enhance community connections
and show a greater match amount. Lesser consideration will be given to proposals for park
improvements and proposals that show a large expenditure for a single activity. Garage sales will be
given the lowest priority. If grant requests exceed the amount available for funding, garage sales will not
be funded.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 8
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
Darius is available to answer questions and provide assistance as grant proposals are developed. Find his
contact info below.
Grant Process Steps
1. Apply
Applications must be received by Sunday November 24th, 2019.
Emailed to: dgray@stlouispark.org
Mailed: Darius Gray, Community Organizer
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Note: Any applications received after the deadline will not be eligible to receive a grant.
2.Review Time
A committee city staff will review the grant proposals and make recommendations for approval to
the City Manager.
3. Final Approval
Final authorization of the awards will be approved at a City Council Meeting mid-December.
4.Signed Agreements
Within two weeks of approval, each recipient neighborhood will receive a grant agreement from the
city. The agreement must be signed and returned prior to any funds being released.
Pre-application Assistance
All applicants are strongly encouraged to talk to city staff as they work to identify projects and put
together their applications. This will help to ensure complete and accurate applications, as well as
streamline application review.
Questions?
Contact Darius Gray, Community Organizer
952-923-0265
dgray@stlouispark.org
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 9
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
Graph below: changes made to the grant for the 2019 cycle.
Past Policy New Policy Reason(s) for Update Possible Impact(s)
100% dollar for
dollar match
Decrease of
dollar for dollar
match to 50%
To reduce barriers of
participation in the
neighborhood grant
program.
•Increase involvement of
neighborhoods association that
may lack in resources of funds,
time and in-kind donations
giving them an opportunity to
still access funds.
•Diversify the pool of applicants,
new NHA that has not applied
in the past.
•Increase in organizing of
neighborhood associations.
N/A Added funds of
$250 to add a
Racial Equity and
Inclusion
Component
To be in alignment
with Council’s
strategic priorities.
•Neighborhood association may
become more intentional and
work towards racial equity and
inclusion in their culture.
•Underrepresented groups may
become more engage in city
processes.
•Close gaps of
underrepresented community
member’s involvement in NHA.
•Eliminating barriers for
community members to
participation
12-month May to
May grant term
Grant term 8
months May 1 –
Dec. 31, 2019
Create alignment for
future grants to be on
a traditional calendar
year.
•Consistency with year calendar.
•2020 grant term will be Jan 1-
Dec 31
N/A Midterm grant
review with
Community
Organizer
More internal
oversight and support
offered.
•Gain insights for ways to
improve the grant program.
•Create synergy and potential
connections – Community
Organizer can play matchmaker
between neighborhood with
similar wants and needs and
other resources.
•Allows more coaching to
happen seamlessly.
•Create and support social
capital between Community
Organizer and neighborhood
associations.
$150 for
environmental
projects
Increase of $50
for
environmental
projects; total
$200
To be in alignment
with Council’s
strategic priorities.
•Increase NHA reach in
environmental projects
•Eliminating barriers for
community members to
participation
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4f) Page 10
Title: 2020 Neighborhood Grant Program
N/A End of term
report
More internal
oversight and
accountability from
those receiving
money.
• Improved documentation and
evaluation.
• Longitudinal study approach
possible in the future.
• Support creative ideas and
resources for future grantees.
• Gain insights for ways to
improve the grant program.
• Work on eliminating future
barriers that NHA faced their
grant year.
Application: Excel
Sheet that was
project-based
submission
requirements
Online grant
submission
Narrative format
of grant
application
Update our grant
process to align with
industry standards.
Online format allows
narrative, budget,
contact info all in one
place. Ease to input in
the SLP internal
system.
• Better documentation and one
consistent platform for
receiving submissions.
• Greater understanding of how
the proposed projects will
speak to direction of the city
and strategic priorities with the
narrative form.
• Both an online and PDF format
gives options for NHA.
N/A Adding a scoring
criteria to NHA
Grant Guidelines
To ensure applicants
understand the
thinking of grant
admins. Encourage
more
creative/innovative
projects.
• Create transparency and
consistency.
• Limit confusion.
• Allows for greater
understanding of future grant
admins to see what was
important for current grant
admins. (Deeper understanding
of current city priorities)
• Potentially create more
creative projects.
• Rubric for applicants.
Grant Limit $2100 Grant limit from
$2100 to $2000
Making it a round
number. Easier for
accounting purposes.
• Creates ease for both
applications and grant admins
in calculation.
• Allows dollars to go slightly
further between neighborhood
groups.
• Allowed to increase Racial
Equity and Environmental
funding.
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4g
Executive summary
Title: Authorize contract for 2020 consultant services related to the Reilly Tar site
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing execution of a contract with
Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. (Summit) for 2020 consultant services related to the
implementation of the Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation (Reilly) Remedial Action Plan (RAP).
Policy consideration: Does the city council desire to continue with Summit as the city’s
consultant for the Reilly Tar and Chemical RAP?
Summary: In September 1986, the Reilly Consent Decree became effective and the city accepted
responsibility for several environmental remediation tasks contained in the Reilly Remedial Action
Plan (RAP). Over the last 33 years the city has retained the services of consulting firms to provide
for the design and/or implementation of RAP activities. Contract activities include groundwater
sampling and analysis, drafting annual reports for review and project administration.
As we approached the 30-year anniversary of the CD/RAP, staff asked the agencies to review
when, where and why we are sampling. A technical team of city staff, our consultants and
agency (MPCA/EPA/MDH) representatives developed pilot cessation plans that allowed for the
temporary cessation of pumping in three different aquifers so its effects can be evaluated for
possible long-term cessation. Similarly, a legal team comprised of our legal counsel, agency
attorneys, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) finalized an amended CD/RAP for the next 30
years. Council approved the amended CD/RAP in August, and it was filed in federal court with
the DOJ in November. It is currently in a 30-day public comment period (closing December 12,
2019). After reviewing the amended documents and public comments, a federal judge will
approve the amendment as submitted or specify what changes are needed prior to approval.
The proposal received from Summit estimates costs for the 2020 work tasks at $335,000. This
amount reflects a $30K reduction from last year’s professional services because our sample
costs have decreased dramatically. This is in addition to the roughly $80K savings in operational
costs achieved from the temporary cessation of pumping in the upper aquifers referenced
above. The city’s standard consulting services agreement will be used for this contract.
Financial or budget considerations: The 2020 Reilly budget contains funding for these Reilly
related consultant activities.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in
environmental stewardship.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Summit’s proposal
Prepared by: Mark Hanson, superintendent of public works
Reviewed by: Cynthia S. Walsh, director of operations and recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4g) Page 2
Title: Authorize contract for 2020 consultant services related to the Reilly Tar site
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution authorizing execution of agreement
with Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. for
2020 professional services related to implementation of
the Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation Remedial Action Plan
Whereas, pursuant to the execution of a Consent Decree in the case of the United States
of America, et al versus Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation, et al, the City of St. Louis Park has
assumed certain responsibilities in the implementation of a Remedial Action Plan related
thereto; and
Whereas, the city has determined that it will be necessary to retain the services of a
professional consultant to implement various activities for which it is responsible under the
terms of the Consent Decree and Remedial Action Plan.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
1.The mayor and city manager are hereby authorized to enter into a contract with Summit
Envirosolutions, Inc. in the amount of $335,000 for 2020 consultant activities related to
the implementation of the Reilly Tar & Chemical Corporation Remedial Action Plan.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2020
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. ∙ 1210 East 115th Street, Burnsville, MN 55337
November 11, 2019
Mr. Mark Hanson
Director of Public Works
City of St. Louis Park
5005 Minnetonka Blvd.
St. Louis Park, MN 55416
Subject: 2020 CD-RAP Implementation
Reilly Site
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
Dear Mr. Hanson:
Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. (Summit) has prepared the following proposal to address the requirements of
the amended CD-RAP in 2020.
Scope of Work
The scope of work identified below uses the same task structure that has been established in the past for a
variety of CD-RAP activities.
Task 100 – Annual Monitoring Report:
Summit will draft text and prepare figures and tables as necessary to assist the City in completing the 2019
Annual Monitoring Report to be submitted to the Agencies on March 15, 2020. In accordance with the
amended RAP, the Annual Monitoring Report will evaluate aquifer pumping and target areas, comparison of
results to the new drinking water standards, long-term stewardship of soil cover at the site, site
redevelopment activities, institutional controls, and information about pilot cessation tests (to be prepared by
Geosyntec). The amended RAP also calls for the submittal of a water level database as a new requirement for
future Annual Monitoring Reports. The budget for this task is higher than last year’s actual cost to account
for the new content and to address Agency comments.
Task 400 – Groundwater Monitoring:
Summit will collect the groundwater samples from monitoring wells and municipal wells identified in the
Reilly Site sampling plan. This includes the quarterly monitoring associated with the Drift, Platteville, and
St. Peter Aquifer pilot cessation tests, quarterly monitoring of 11 Prairie du Chien and Jordan Aquifer wells
requested by MPCA, and the other routine monitoring specified in the sampling plan. The budget for this
task is based on the actual costs for the monitoring which began in 2018 and a contingency if wells need to
be resampled to confirm results.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Authorize contract for 2020 consultant services related to the Reilly Tar site Page 3
Mr. Mark Hanson
November 11, 2019
Page 2
Summit Envirosolutions, Inc. ∙ 1210 East 115th Street, Burnsville, MN 55337
Summit will also monitor water levels using a combination of transducers and manual measurements in
Reilly Site wells. The cost for transducer maintenance and annual calibration is included.
Task 480 – Sampling Plan and QAPP:
In accordance with the amended CD-RAP, it will not be necessary to submit new plans each year, unless the
City or the Agencies propose changes. The budget for this task is a contingency in case any such changes are
proposed in 2020.
Task 600 – Laboratory Coordination:
Table 1 provides cost estimates for three subtasks as summarized below:
1. Working with Pace Labs on implementing the QAPP, coordinating sampling events, and updating
and maintaining the databases for water quality and water levels. This task also includes water level
and water quality data exchanges with the Agencies.
2. Providing data quality review and/or data validation for the laboratory testing. The data validation
and data quality review will be documented in the Annual Monitoring Report.
3. Pace laboratory subcontract for all 2020 analyses, including routine monitoring and pilot cessation
test monitoring.
Task 810 - Program Management and Miscellaneous:
This task includes overall planning, directing, and controlling Summit’s resources to perform this project.
The task also includes miscellaneous project activities throughout the year, such as emergency site utility
repairs, updating the draft Soil Cover Report, reviewing Agency contractor reports, preparing
correspondence, and participating in meetings. The estimated cost shown in Table 1 matches the actual
amounts spent for the past several years.
Project Budget
Table 1 summarizes the estimated costs for the tasks described above. Summit proposes to conduct this work
on a time and materials basis for an estimated cost of $335,000 in accordance with the same contract terms
the City has used on this project in the past. If you have questions regarding this proposal or the project in
general, please contact me at (651) 262-4236. We look forward to continued collaboration with you on this
project.
Sincerely,
Summit Envirosolutions, Inc.
William M. Gregg
Program Manager
cc. Jay Hall, SLP
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Authorize contract for 2020 consultant services related to the Reilly Tar site Page 4
Table 1. Estimated Project Costs
2020 Reilly Site
Task Description
Proposed 2020
Budget
Task 100 - Annual Monitoring Report $35,000
Task 400 - Groundwater Monitoring $80,000
Task 480 - Sampling Plan and QAPP $10,000
Task 600 - Laboratory Coordination
Subtask 1: Lab coordination $20,000
Subtask 2: Data validation and review $45,000
Subtask 3: Pace subcontract (all testing)$75,000
Task 810 - Project Management and Miscellaneous $70,000
Total 2020 estimated project cost $335,000
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4g)
Title: Authorize contract for 2020 consultant services related to the Reilly Tar site Page 5
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4h
Executive summary
Title: Accept donations to Operations and Recreation Department
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution approving acceptance of a $100 donation
from St. Louis Park Golden Kiwanis for the Westwood Hills Nature Center 38th annual
Halloween party and $100 from Leslie Marcus for park enhancements or program needs at
Westwood Hills Nature Center.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to accept these gifts with restrictions on their
use?
Summary: State statute requires city council’s acceptance of donations. This requirement is
necessary in order to make sure the city council has knowledge of any restrictions placed on
the use of each donation prior to it being expended.
St. Louis Park Golden Kiwanis graciously donated $100 to Westwood Hills Nature Center. The
donation is given with the restriction that it be used for the 38th annual Halloween party.
Leslie Marcus graciously donated $100 to Westwood Hills Nature Center. The donation is given
with the restriction that it be used for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills
Nature Center.
Financial or budget considerations: These donations will be used for the 38th annual
Halloween party and for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood Hills Nature
Center.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Carrie Mandler, secretary program aide
Reviewed by: Mark Oestreich, Westwood Hills Nature Center Manager
Cynthia S. Walsh, director of operations and recreation
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4h) Page 2
Title: Accept donations to Operations and Recreation Department
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution approving acceptance of a donation in the amount of $100 for the
38th annual Halloween party and $100 to be used for park enhancements or
program needs at Westwood Hills Nature Center
Whereas, the City of St. Louis Park is required by state statute to authorize acceptance
of any donations; and
Whereas, the city council must also ratify any restrictions placed on the donation by the
donor; and
Whereas, St. Louis Park Golden Kiwanis donated $100 and Leslie Marcus donated $100.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park that these
gifts are hereby accepted with thanks to St. Louis Park Golden Kiwanis with the understanding
that it must be used for the 38th annual Halloween party and thanks to Leslie Marcus with the
understanding that it must be used for park enhancements or program needs at Westwood
Hills Nature Center.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4i
Executive summary
Title: Final payment resolution – 2019 concrete replacement - Project No. 4019-0003
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution accepting work and authorizing final
payment in the amount of $9,497.98 for the annual concrete replacement project with
Universal Services, Inc. - Project No. 4019-0003, City Contract No. 60-19.
Policy consideration: Not applicable.
Summary: On Feb. 19, 2019, the city council awarded the bid for the concrete replacement
project – City Project No. 4019-0003. The project was advertised, bid and awarded to Universal
Services, Inc. in the amount of $193,500.00. This project was for miscellaneous concrete repair,
including sidewalk, curb and gutter, and storm sewer catch basins at various locations in the
city. This annual construction contract is for concrete repairs in the pavement management
area scheduled for mill and overlay the following year. It also addresses sidewalk trip hazards
throughout the city.
The contractor completed this work within the contract time allowed. A change order of
$12,335.35 (6.0%) was necessary to cover the additional cost of labor and materials for work
associated with tree preservation. The overall project had an underrun of $15,875.84 (-13.7%)
for a final construction cost of $189,959.51.
Financial or budget considerations: The cost of the work performed by the contractor under
Contract No. 60-19 has been calculated as follows:
Original Contract Price $ 193,500.00
Change Order 1 $12,335.35
Revised Contract Amount $205,835.35
Underrun -$15,875.84
Amount Due (based on actual work) $189,959.51
Previous Payments -$180,461.53
Balance Due $9,497.98
This project was included in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). The work was paid for
using public works operations, stormwater utility, and pavement management funds.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Phillip Elkin, sr. engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4i) Page 2
Title: Final payment resolution – 2019 concrete replacement - Project No. 4019-0003
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution authorizing final payment and accepting work for
the 2019 random concrete repairs project
City Project No. 4019-0003
Contract No. 60-19
Be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, as follows:
1.Pursuant to a written contract with the City dated Feb. 19, 2019, Universal Services, Inc.
has satisfactorily completed the 2019 random concrete repairs project, as per Contract No.
60-19.
2.The Engineering Director has filed her recommendations for final acceptance of the work.
3.The work completed under this contract is accepted and approved. The final contract cost
is $189,959.51.
4.The City Manager is directed to make final payment in the amount of $9,497.98 on this
contract, taking the contractor's receipt in full.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4j
Executive summary
Title: Amendment for Dakota-Edgewood bridge and bikeway consultant contract – Project No.
4019-2000
Recommended action: Motion to authorize execution of an amendment to the professional
services contract with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. in the amount of $163,248.61 for the
preliminary and final design of the Dakota-Edgewood bridge and bikeway project (4019-2000).
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to continue with the final design of the Dakota-
Edgewood bridge and bikeway?
Summary: The city entered into contract No. 76-18 with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. in June of
2018 to complete the preliminary and final design for the Dakota Avenue bridge and bikeway
from 26th Street to Cedar Lake Road.
As the project has progressed through the preliminary design phase, there were considerable
changes to the project scope that have led to a much more robust project than originally
estimated. Amendment #2 is necessary to address the additional time and resources that were
needed to produce the final design. Most of the additional expenses are related to creating a
bridge alignment and trail network that fits the many constraints of the built environment.
Original contract $499,309.00
Amendment #1 (approved by City Manager) $ 37,854.00
Amendment #2 $163,248.61
Contract total $700,412.61
Financial or budget considerations: This project is included in the City’s Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) for 2019. At this time, the project is proposed to be funded using general
obligation bonds as part of the Connect the Park. The federal funding in the amount of
$2,918,400 will be used to offset a portion of the construction costs.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for
people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Prepared by: Jack Sullivan, sr. engineering project manager
Reviewed by: Debra Heiser, engineering director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4j) Page 2
Title: Amendment for Dakota-Edgewood bridge and bikeway consultant contract – Project No. 4019-2000
Discussion
Background: The city entered into contract 76-18 with SRF Consulting Group Inc. in June of
2018 to complete the preliminary and final design for the Dakota Avenue bridge and bikeway
from 26th Street to Cedar Lake Road.
Amendment #1
The original contract included provisions for managing contaminated soil that was expected to
be encountered during design and construction. SRF subcontracted with Braun Intertec for a
Phase 1 environmental site assessment (ESA) of the project area. The Phase 1 ESA indicated
that additional environmental investigation needs to be completed to fully assess the
environmental risk to the project. This amendment is for Braun Intertec to complete a Phase 2
ESA of the construction area. A Phase 2 ESA includes additional soil borings, soil screening,
sampling, and analytical testing. In addition, they will include a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) and
Construction Contingency Plan (CCP) for the site. Amendment #1 was approved
administratively by the city manager in mid-November 2019.
Amendment #2
As the project progressed through the preliminary design and public process, there was an
expansion of the project scope to respond to feedback. The major areas where more time and
resources were needed to produce the final design include:
•Agency coordination
•Project management
•Meetings with the public and staff to work through design alternatives
•Development of 21 bridge concepts. There were three anticipated in the original
contract.
•Development of additional cost estimates
•Adding environmental documentation for two sites as a result of design alternatives
•Developing additional concepts for the trail along Edgewood Avenue to reduce right of
way needs and address property owner questions
•Developing parking lot modification concepts for the Peter Hobart school east parking
lot to accommodate the proposed trail and address concerns
•The bridge design required more detail to work through MnDOT and BNSF approvals.
•Modifications of the project design to tie into the Cedar Lake Road project
•Value engineering to develop a project that aligns with the CIP estimates
•Additional field survey data collection
•The approved project includes modifications to curbs, pavement, utilities and driveways
along Edgewood Avenue that required additional design.
Schedule: The following is the proposed project schedule:
Right of way/easement acquisition Late 2019 – early 2020
Final design Late 2019 – early 2020
Authorization to bid Early 2020
Construction Summer 2020 – late fall 2020
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4k
Executive summary
Title: Electronic funds transfer delegation of authority
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution delegating authority to make electronic
funds transfer.
Policy consideration: Does the city council wish to implement a process to delegate the
authority to make electronic funds transfer to the chief financial officer?
Summary: Minnesota Statute, section 471.38, subdivision 3 requires formal approval to
authorize electronic funds transfers. If the proper controls are in place, a charter city may make
electronic funds transfers for various types of claims.
The purpose of formally delegating the authority to make electronic transfers is to comply with
Minnesota legal compliance standards which are tested by the external auditors during the
annual audit. Previously the statute applied only to school districts but was expanded to also
include charter cities. Without the delegation and proper controls the city would not be
allowed to complete electronic funds transfers, which would impede some of the current
business practices. We do process electronic payments currently, and the update of the statute
requires us now to adopt a resolution annually.
The city council must annually delegate its authority to a business administrator or chief
financial officer or the officer’s designee. In addition, controls should be established around
documentation, initiation, communication and approval requirements. The city currently has
the proper controls in place but also needs to formally delegate electronic funds transfer
authority to the chief financial officer in order to utilize this process.
Financial or budget considerations: None
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Mark Ebensteiner, finance manager
Reviewed by: Tim Simon, chief financial officer
Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 4k) Page 2
Title: Electronic funds transfer delegation of authority
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution delegating authority to make electronic funds transfer
Whereas, electronic funds transfer is the process of value exchange via mechanical
means without the use of checks, drafts, or similar negotiable instruments.
Whereas, in accordance with Minnesota Statute 471.38, a local government may make an
electronic funds transfer for the following:
(1) for a claim for a payment from an imprest
payroll bank account or investment of excess money;
(2) for a payment of tax or aid anticipation certificates;
(3) for a payment of contributions to pension or retirement fund;
(4) for vendor payments; and
(5) for payment of bond principal, bond interest and a fiscal agent service charge from
the debt redemption fund.
Whereas, the city utilizes electronic funds transfer for disbursements related to the
transmittal of payroll, payroll withholdings, debt service payments and other disbursements.
Whereas, Statute 471.38 requires that certain controls be enacted in order for a local
government to utilize electronic funds transfer, including that the governing body annually
delegate the authority to make electronic funds transfers to a designated business
administrator or chief financial officer or the officer’s designee.
Now therefore be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota,
that:
1. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 471.38 the city council delegates the authority to
make electronic funds transfers on behalf of the city to the city’s chief financial
officer or their designee.
2. The chief financial officer is directed to take all steps necessary for compliance with
Minnesota Statute 471.38.
3. This delegation of authority shall remain in effect until superseded by a subsequent
resolution, but in no event later than December 31, 2020.
Reviewed for administration:
Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Public hearing: 6a
Executive summary
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Recommended action: Mayor is asked to open the public hearing, take testimony, and then
close the public hearing. Motion to approve the first reading of an ordinance prohibiting the
sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products and set second reading for January 6, 2020.
Policy consideration: Will the restriction on the sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products be a
benefit to the community’s public health.
Summary: At the October 14 and 28 study sessions, council discussed a proposed ban of selling
e-cigarettes and vaping products in the city due to the health risks that are being experienced.
The proposed action by the council is addressing the concerns voiced from residents both
young and old.
During the October 28, 2019 study session council discussed possible regulation of various e-
cigarettes and vaping products and directed staff to proceed with development of a draft
ordinance. The proposed ordinance would amend City code chapter 8, division 3, subdivision X
by prohibiting the sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products as regulated by code.
Notice of the ordinance being considered and an invitation to attend an informational meeting
was mailed to all tobacco license holders over thirty days in advance. Informational meetings
were offered by staff on November 14 and 21, 2019 to explain the proposed regulation and
answer questions. Only one person, who represented the BP station, attended.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Ordinance
Summary ordinance
Prepared by: Ann Boettcher, property maintenance & licensing manager
Reviewed by: Brian Hoffman, director of building & energy
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 2
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Discussion
Background: In 2017 the council approved two amendments to the tobacco establishment
license code; raising the legal age to purchase tobacco to 21 and prohibiting the sale of all
flavored tobacco products except for menthol and wintergreen.
At study sessions during October, 2019, council discussed the possibility of prohibiting the sale
of all e-cigarettes and vaping products due to the public health issues these products create.
The city attorney at the October 28 study session indicated the council would have the ability to
adopt an ordinance within the business licensing provisions of the city code to prohibit the sale
of e-cigarettes and vaping products in the city.
Present considerations: E-cigarettes are sometimes called e-cigs, vapes, e-hookahs, vape pens
and electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). Some products are designed to look like
regular cigarettes, cigars or pipes. Some look like USB flash drives, pens and other everyday
items.
With assistance from Ruth Tripp, Hennepin County Public Health, the following facts, in italics,
are being provided for council consideration during discussion.
Minnesota vaping-associated lung injuries (This information is updated weekly at the MDH
vaping-associated lung injury page.)
• As of November 26, 2019, Minnesota has 125 confirmed or probable vaping-associated
lung injury cases and 23 cases under review. There have been 3 deaths.
• 29 of the confirmed and probable cases in Minnesota are Hennepin County residents.
Ten cases are Minneapolis residents and the remaining are suburban residents.
• The Minnesota Department of Health is working with local public health departments,
including Hennepin County Public Health, and health care providers to investigate
reports of severe lung injury potentially related to vaping and e-cigarette use.
National data on vaping-associated lung injuries.
https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html
• As of November 20, 2019, there are 2,290 cases of e-cigarette, or vaping product use
associated lung injury with 47 deaths.
• Among the 2,016 cases with available data on hospitalization status (as of November 5,
2019):
o 77% were under 35 years old;
o Ages range from 13-78 years with a median age of 24 years;
o 95% were hospitalized;
o 68% were male.
2019 Minnesota Student Survey (MSS) (conducted January – May 2019)
• The 2019 MSS of youth attending St. Louis Park (SLP) School District tells us that:
o 26% of 11th graders and 18% of 9th graders used any form of tobacco in the past
30 days.
o E-cigarettes are the most commonly used commercial tobacco product.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 3
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
24% of 11th graders and 17% of 9th graders reported vaping in the past 30
days.
More girls (20%) in 9th grade report vaping in the past 30 days than boys
(15%).
o Use of conventional products by 11th graders are less common than e-cigarette
use. In the past 30 days:
Two percent used smokeless products;
Three percent smoked cigarettes and same amount used cigar products;
Four percent used a hookah or waterpipe to smoke tobacco.
o Young people commonly use menthol and flavored tobacco products. Of those
who used tobacco in the past 30 days, the proportion who reported using
menthol and flavored products is as follows:
Of SLP students who used tobacco in the
past 30 days, the proportion who used:
9th grade 11th grade
Menthol 33% 43%
Flavored 44% 40%
• Statewide MSS data shows that:
o Underage youth report easy access to e-cigarette products. In Minnesota, over
23% of underage 11th grade students bought e-cigarettes directly from a retail
outlet (14% in a vape shop; 9.6% online). Vape stores are often located near
schools and universities.i
o The survey also found Minnesota youth are ill-informed about the health risks of
e-cigarettes with 76% of 11th graders saying there is either no, slight or a
moderate risk to using e-cigarettes. One of the common reasons youth use e-
cigarettes is because they believe vaping is mostly harmless.
The use of e-cigarettes/vapes is unsafe for all ages, especially for youth and young adults.
Nearly all e-cigarettes contain nicotine, which is highly addictive and harmful to the adolescent
developing brain (under 25 years). Nicotine can harm the parts of the brain that control
attention, learning, mood, and impulse control. The aerosol from e-cigarettes/vapes contains
harmful and potentially harmful constituents, such as ultrafine particles; heavy metals like
nickel, tin, and lead; and other cancer-causing chemicals. E-cigarettes/vaping products are not
currently regulated by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).
Medical experts still do not know the effects and potentially harmful doses of heated and
aerosolized constituents of e-cigarette liquids, including solvents, flavorants, and toxicants.
E-cigarettes are not approved by the FDA as an aid to quit smoking and may expose users to
some of the same toxic chemicals found in combustible cigarette smoke. There are other proven,
safe, and effective methods for quitting smoking.
The FDA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) have identified Vitamin E
Acetate as associated with the injuries. The evidence is not yet sufficient to rule out the
contribution of other chemicals. Many different substances and product sources are still under
investigation, and it may be that there is more than one cause of this outbreak.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 4
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Young e-cigarette users often have never smoked combustible cigarettes. There is increasing
evidence that young people who use e-cigarettes are more likely to become tobacco smokers,
compared to youth who have never used e-cigarettes.ii
In 2018, the Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey showed a sharp increase in young adult (18-24
year olds) e-cigarette use, from 13% in 2014 to 22% in 2018.iii Three in four young adult e-
cigarette users reported never having used tobacco products before they started using e-
cigarettes.
To date, no other cities in Minnesota have adopted a restriction on e-cigarette sales that does
not include an exemption for some stores, such as adult-only tobacco/vape stores.
The city of Rushford MN is currently considering a similar approach to St. Louis Park.
San Francisco banned all electronic delivery devices.
The city currently has 21 establishments licensed to sell tobacco products. Of those 21, only
eight have been identified as selling e-cigarettes/vaping products. Notices of the proposed
ordinance, public hearing, and two informational meetings that were held on November 14 and
21 were sent out to all license holders, including for a new establishment not yet open. Only
one person attended the two meeting opportunities. A person representing a company with a
SLP tobacco license, shared concern that this proposed action will cause customers to go to the
neighboring cities to purchase not only their vaping products, but other products that are
purchased at the same time. She added, this type of action would better serve the public if it
was a statewide mandate. Staff did not receive any other emails/calls regarding this
amendment. Staff also sent letters to the advocates from the previous actions taken in 2017
informing them of the proposed amendment and public hearing time.
At a December 4, 2019 news conference, Governor Walz along with Attorney General Ellingson
announced the state filed a lawsuit against Juul Labs accusing the e-cigarette maker of
unlawfully targeting young people with its products to get a new generation addicted to
nicotine. Also, Governor Walz has called on the legislature to ban flavored e-cigarette products
and create a state-wide ban on tobacco products for anyone under 21.
Next steps: If the council approves the first reading, the second reading is scheduled for
January 6, 2020. Publication of the summary ordinance will occur on January 16, 2020 and the
proposed effective date for the ordinance will be February 1, 2020. Staff will be conducting
their annual licensed establishment inspections after February 1 to ensure all e-cigarettes and
vaping products have been removed from the shelves.
__________________________
I Public Health Law Center Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. (2019). Location, location, location: Tobacco & e-cig point of sale. Available at: https://publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/resources/Location-Tobacco-Ecig-Point-Of-Sale-2019.pdf.
ii Berry, K.M., et al., Association of electronic cigarette use with subsequent initiation of tobacco cigarettes in US youths. JAMA network open, 2019. 2(2): p. e187794-e187794.
iii ClearWay Minnesota. Minnesota Adult Tobacco Survey. Available at: http://clearwaymn.org/mats/. Accessed 10/15/19.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 5
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Ordinance No. _____-20
City of St. Louis Park
Hennepin County, Minnesota
An ordinance amending St. Louis Park City Code Chapter 8 – Business and
Licenses, Subdivision X. Tobacco Products and Tobacco Related Devices, Section
8-374 Regulations Adopted and Section 8-378 Violations; Penalty to ban sales of
certain electronic delivery devices
The City of St. Louis Park does ordain:
Section 1. Findings.
(a) As of October 22, 2019, the United States Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) reports 1,604 cases of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury
(EVALI) from 49 states (all except Alaska), the District of Columbia, and one United States
territory.
(b) As of October 22, 2019, the CDC reports 34 confirmed EVALI related deaths in 24
states. More deaths are under investigation.
(c) As of October 22, 2019, the CDC reports three confirmed EVALI related deaths in
Minnesota.
(d) CDC reports that as of October 22, 2019 the age range for EVALI patients ranges
from 13 years to 75 years with a median age of 24 years.
(e) EVALI case counts continue to increase and new cases are being reported.
(f) All EVALI patients reported a history of using e-cigarette, or vaping products.
(g) Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) was present in most of the samples tested by FDA as
of October 22, 2019, and most EVALI patients reported a history of using THC containing
products. CDC reports that the latest national and state findings suggest e-cigarette, or vaping
products containing THC, particularly those obtained off the street or from informal sources (e.g.
friends, family members, illicit dealers), are linked to most of the EVALI cases and play a major
role in the outbreak. However, as of October 22, 2019, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
and CDC had not identified the cause or causes of the reported lung injuries, and the only
commonality among all cases is that patients report the use of e-cigarette, or vaping products.
CDC reports no one compound or ingredient had emerged as the cause of EVALI and there may
be more than one cause of EVALI. The cause of EVALI remains unknown.
(h) As of October 22, 2019, CDC recommends that since the specific compound(s) or
ingredient(s) causing lung injury are not yet known, the only sure way avoid EVALI while the
investigation continues is to refrain from use of all e-cigarette, or vaping, products.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 6
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
(i) According to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) 2019 statistics 26.4% of
11th graders, 16.3% of 9th graders, and 11.1% of 8th graders, report current use of electronic
cigarettes.
(j) Virtually all electronic cigarettes that are sold today entered the market after
2007, but have not been reviewed by the FDA to determine if they are appropriate for the public
health. In 2017, the FDA issued Guidance that purports to give electronic cigarette manufactures
until August 8, 2022 to submit their application for premarket review. The Guidance further
purports to allow unapproved products to stay on the market indefinitely, until such time as FDA
complies with its statutory duty to conduct a premarket review to determine whether a new
tobacco product poses a risk to public health.
(k) By the time electronic cigarette manufactures will be required to submit their
premarket review applications, electronic cigarettes will have been on the market for fifteen
years without any FDA analysis of their safety and alleged benefit. In light of the immediate
health threat posed by EVALI, the City of St. Louis Park is not content to wait for FDA action to
address for its residents what appears from the evidence to be a major health crisis that is going
unattended.
Section 2. City Code Chapter 8 – Business and Licenses, Subdivision X. Tobacco Products
and Tobacco Related Devices, Section 8-374 Regulations Adopted is amended by adding the
underlined language as follows:
Sec. 8-374. Regulations Adopted.
(a) It shall be a violation of this subdivision for any person to sell or offer to sell any tobacco,
tobacco-related device, electronic delivery device, nicotine or lobelia delivery product:
(1) To any person under the age of 21 years.
(2) By means of any type of vending machine.
(3) By means of self-service merchandising whereby the customer does not need to
make a verbal or written request to an employee of the licensed premises in order
to receive the tobacco, tobacco-related device, electronic delivery device, nicotine
or lobelia delivery product. All such products shall be stored behind a counter or
other area not freely accessible to customers.
(4) Containing opium, morphine, jimson weed, bella donna, strychnos, cocaine,
marijuana or other type of deleterious, hallucinogenic or toxic or controlled
substance, except nicotine, and not naturally found in tobacco, tobacco-related
devices or electronic delivery devices.
(5) By any other means or to any other person prohibited by federal, state or other
local laws, ordinances or other regulations.
(6) That meets the definition of flavored product.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 7
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
(b) Tobacco, sampling of tobacco, electronic delivery devices, nicotine or lobelia delivery
products within an establishment selling any tobacco, tobacco product, tobacco related devices,
electronic delivery devices, nicotine or lobelia delivery product is prohibited.
(c) No person shall sell, offer to sell, or distribute liquid, whether or not such liquid contains
nicotine that is intended for human consumption and use in an electronic delivery device that is
not contained in child-resistant packaging as that term is defined in Code of Federal Regulations,
title 16, section 1700.15 (b)(1), as in effect on January 1, 2015. A licensee that fails to comply with
this subpart is subject to administrative penalty pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 461.12, subd. 2.
(d) No person shall sell, offer to sell or distribute an electronic delivery device that:
(1) Is a “new tobacco product” as defined in 21 U.S.C. § 387j(a)(1) as may be amended
from time to time,
(2) Requires FDA premarket review under 21 U.S.C § 387j, and
(3) Does not have a premarket review order under 21 U.S.C. § 387j(c)(1)(A)(i), as may be
amended from time to time.
Section 3. City Code Chapter 8 – Business and Licenses, Subdivision X. Tobacco Products
and Tobacco Related Devices, Section 8-378 Violations; penalty is amended by adding the
underlined language as follows:
Sec. 8-378. Violation; penalty.
(a) Generally. Any violation of this subdivision shall be grounds to revoke or
suspend a license under this subdivision.
(b) Criminal penalty. As set forth in M.S.A. ch. 609, it shall be a:
(1) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell tobacco, a tobacco-related device,
electronic delivery device, nicotine or lobelia delivery product to a
person under the age of 21 years for the first violation. Whoever
violates this subdivision a subsequent time within five years of a
previous conviction under this subdivision is guilty of a gross
misdemeanor.
(2) Misdemeanor to furnish tobacco, a tobacco-related device, electronic
delivery device, nicotine or lobelia delivery product to a person under
the age of 21 years. Whoever violates this paragraph a subsequent
time is guilty of a gross misdemeanor.
(3) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell or offer to sell a flavored product in
violation of section 8- 374(a)(6).
(4) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell, offer to sell or distribute liquid,
whether or not such liquid contains nicotine, that is intended for
human consumption and use in an electronic delivery device that is
not contained in child-resistant packaging as that term is defined in
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 8
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Code of Federal Regulations, title 16, section 1700.15 (b)(1), as in
effect on January 1, 2015.
(5) Petty misdemeanor for anyone under the age of 21 years to sell,
furnish or give away any tobacco, tobacco-related device, electronic
delivery device, nicotine or lobelia delivery product. This subsection
shall not apply to a person age 18-20 years while working as an
employee of a business holding a license granted pursuant to this
subdivision.
(6) Misdemeanor for anyone to sell an electronic delivery device in
violation of section 8-374 (d).
(c) Presumed penalties for Violations: The presumed penalties for violations are
as follows (unless specified, numbers below indicate consecutive business
days’ suspension):
Type of Violation 1st Violation 2nd
Violation
within 36
months
3rd
Violation
within 36
months
4th
Violation
within 36 months
1. Commission of a felony related to
the licensed activity.
Revocation N/A N/A N/A
2. Sale of tobacco, tobacco-related
device, electronic delivery device,
nicotine or lobelia delivery product
while license is under suspension.
Revocation N/A N/A N/A
3. Sale of tobacco, tobacco-related
device, electronic delivery device,
nicotine or lobelia delivery product
to underage person.
$500 $1,000
and 1 day
$2,000
and 30 days
Revocation
4. Refusal to allow government
inspectors or police admission to
inspect premises.
5 days 15 days Revocation N/A
5. Illegal gambling on premises. 3 days 6 days 18 days Revocation
6. Failure to attend mandatory
education training.
$250 $750 and 1
day
$2,000
and 3 days
Revocation
7. Prohibited sale or offer for sale of
flavored products.
$500 $1,000 and 1 day
$2,000 and 30 days Revocation
8. Prohibited sale or offer for sale of
liquid intended for human
consumption in an electronic
delivery device that is not
contained in child resistant packaging.
$500 $1,000
and 1
day
$2,000 and
30 days
Revocation
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 9
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
The penalty for violations without a presumptive penalty shall be determined by the City
Council. The imposition of the presumptive penalty shall be a written notice to the licensee
and may be appealed through an administrative hearing process as set by the city manager.
The city manager's decision may be appealed to the city council by filing a written appeal to
the city clerk within ten days of receiving written notice of the city manager's decision.
(d) Multiple violations: At a licensee’s first appearance before the Council, the Council
must act upon all of the violations that have been alleged in the notice sent to the licensee.
The Council in that case must consider the presumptive penalty for each violation under the
first appearance column in subsection (B) above. The occurrence of multiple violations is
grounds for deviation from the presumed penalties in the Council’s discretion.
(e) Subsequent violations: Violations occurring after the notice of hearing has been
mailed, but prior to the hearing, must be treated as a separate violation and dealt with as a
second appearance before the Council, unless the City Manager and licensee agree in writing
to add the violation to the first appearance. The same procedure applies to the second,
third, or fourth appearance before the Council.
(f) Subsequent appearances: Upon a second, third, or fourth appearance before the
Council by the same licensee, the Council must impose the presumptive penalty for the
violation or violations giving rise to the subsequent appearance without regard to the
particular violation or violations that were the subject of the first or prior appearance.
However, the Council may consider the amount of time elapsed between appearances as a
basis for deviating from the presumptive penalty imposed by this Section.
(g) Computation of violations: Multiple violations are computed by checking the time
period of the three (3) years immediately prior to the date of the most current violation.
(h) Other penalties: Nothing in this Section shall restrict or limit the authority of the
Council to suspend up to sixty (60) days, revoke the license, impose a civil fee not to
exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000.00), to impose conditions, or take any other action in
accordance with law; provided, that the license holder has been afforded an opportunity for a
hearing in the manner provided in this Chapter.
(i) Additional Requirements. In addition to civil penalties, every licensee that has been
found in violation of this Chapter must enter into and complete an education training
program approved by the City’s Police Department.
(j) Exceptions and defenses. Nothing in this subdivision shall prevent the providing of
tobacco, tobacco products or tobacco related devices to a person under the age of 21 as
part of a bona fide religious, spiritual or cultural ceremony. It shall be an affirmative
defense to a violation of this subdivision for a person to have reasonably relied upon proof
of age as set forth by state law.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect on February 1, 2020.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 10
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Adopted by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park this 6th day of January, 2020.
Public Hearing December 16, 2019
First Reading December 16, 2019
Second Reading January 6, 2020
Date of Publication January 16, 2020
Date Ordinance takes effect February 1, 2020
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council (insert date)
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest: Approved as to form and execution:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk Soren Mattick, city attorney
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 6a) Page 11
Title: Sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
Summary for publication
Ordinance No. ___-20
Prohibiting sale of e-cigarettes and vaping products
This ordinance amends the tobacco licensing Sec. 8-374(d) prohibiting the sale of e-cigarettes and
vaping products and Sec. 8-378 violations.
This ordinance shall take effect 15 days after publication.
Adopted by the City Council Jan. 6, 2020
Jake Spano/s/
Mayor
A copy of the full text of this ordinance is available for inspection with the city clerk.
Published in St. Louis Park Sailor: Jan.16, 2020
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Action agenda item: 8a
Executive summary
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement
plan (CIP)
Recommended action:
•Motion to adopt Resolution approving the 2020 budgets and authorizing the 2020 final
property tax levy.
•Motion to adopt Resolution authorizing the 2020 final HRA levy.
•Motion to adopt Resolution approving the 2020-2029 capital improvement plan.
•Motion to adopt 2019 budget amendment.
Policy consideration:
•Is the city council in support of setting the 2020 final property tax levy at $34,770,521,
which is a 4.96% increase over the 2019 final property tax levy?
•Is the city council in support of setting the maximum HRA levy allowed by state statute at
$1,332,978?
•Is the city council in support of setting the 2020 budgets for general, enterprise, special
revenue, and select capital project funds?
•Is the city council in support of setting the 2020-2029 capital improvement plan which is
updated on an annual basis?
Summary: Included is information pertaining to the adoption of the 2020 property tax levy,
budgets, HRA levy, and 2020-2029 CIP. Information is also provided on the tax impacts to a
residential homestead property and a brief discussion on 2020 utility rates that were previously
reviewed and approved.
Financial or budget considerations: The proposed tax levies, budgets, and utility rates will help
support city services, capital improvements, and debt service obligations for fiscal year 2020.
Strategic priority consideration: All areas of strategic priorities are supported by the city’s budget.
•St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to
create a more just and inclusive community for all.
•St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
•St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood-
oriented development.
•St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way
around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
•St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through
community engagement.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolutions
2020-2029 CIP project by funding source
Prepared by: Tim Simon, chief financial officer
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 2
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
Discussion
Background: The 2020 budget was developed with the council’s strategic priorities, Vision 3.0,
and the comprehensive plan in mind. The budget addresses the need to maintain our
infrastructure (city roads, parks, building etc.), technology, debt service, and responsive and
high-quality service to the residents and businesses, which includes personnel costs for police,
fire and other staff.
•On May 13, 2019 staff and council met to discuss the 2020 budget process and the
“systems thinking” approach when considering operations, programs, policies and
opportunities for St. Louis Park.
•On June 17, 2019 staff and council met to start reviewing budget assumptions and a
property tax levy range. Staff discussed new communication tools such as our financial
transparency tool and the property tax process video.
•On July 22, 2019 staff and council met to review the public safety budgets and both the
Fire and Police chief provided information on their proposed 2020 budget and
operations.
•At the Aug. 12 and Sept. 3, 2019 study sessions, the council reviewed information from
the staff report (including staff changes and significant revenue/expenditure
adjustments) and subsequently directed staff to prepare a 2020 preliminary property
tax levy change of 5.61% when compared to the 2019 final property tax levy. In
addition, the council directed staff to proceed with preparing the 2020 preliminary HRA
levy at the 0.0185%, which is the maximum allowed by state statute.
•On Sept. 16, 2019, the EDA and council adopted the 2020 preliminary HRA levy of
$1,332,978. Also, the council adopted the 2020 preliminary property tax levy of
$34,985,521, which is approximately a 5.61% change over the 2019 final property tax
levy.
•On Oct. 14, 2019, the council reviewed the 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP),
long range financial management plan, and debt modeling assumptions.
•On Nov 12, 2019, staff and council reviewed a number of items to reduce the final levy
to 4.96%.
•On Dec. 2, 2019, the city council conducted the truth in taxation public hearing meeting
with information showing the final levy to be set at 4.96%.
Budget communication: As council is aware, we continue to offer more information and
transparent budget process. Information is provided through the webpage and having an
active e-mail address for any questions that arise. We also for the third year did a 2020 budget
video for Facebook. We also created a property tax process video and launched a financial
transparency tool. This is in addition, to other forms of communication such as the article on
the property tax process in the park perspective, posting budget staff reports for example.
Summary: 2020 preliminary adopted levy and updated 2020 levy.
1.The 2020 preliminary property tax levy was adopted on September 16 at $34,985,521,
which is approximately 5.61% more than the 2019 final Levy.
2.The updated property tax levy being considered on December 16 at $34,770,521, which
is approximately 4.96% more than the 2019 final levy.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 3
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
The proposed breakdown of the 4.96% proposed 2020 property tax levy by fund
(1)= Line items are part of the General Fund levy, separated so council can see investment in strategic priorities.
2020 Budgets: The council will consider a resolution for adoption that includes summary
budget data for the General, Enterprise, Internal Services, Special Revenue, and select Capital
Project Funds. These funds are consistent with our long-range financial management plan that
we reviewed earlier and work in conjunction with the CIP.
HRA Levy: The HRA levy is recommended to be set at the maximum allowed of 0.0185% of
estimated market value, which is consistent with previous years. The amount for 2020 is
estimated at $1,332,978. The HRA levy is being directed to fund direct housing related salaries
to run the housing programs and a transfer to the newly created housing trust fund.
2020-2029 Capital Improvement Plan (CIP): The CIP is one of the long range planning tools that
the city utilizes. The CIP is a ten-year plan, but is updated annually as priorities, projects, and
funding sources change. The CIP is only an estimate of future projects, as only the current year
(2020) projects are authorized during the next year. Years 2021-2029 are for planning
purposes. Any project in the CIP estimated to cost more than $175,000 will be formally bid and
brought back for acceptance by the City Council.
The City Council has reviewed the 10-year CIP during work sessions throughout the 2020
budget process. Earlier in the year we started the long-range plan on utility and capital project
funds, which tie into the long-range financial management plan and our debt modeling.
The 2020-2029 CIP summary is as follows:
•$265 million in planned investment over the next ten years.
•$234 million of these costs are being paid from sources or revenue streams the City has
direct control of such as franchise fees, tax levy dollars, utility rates, future bonding, etc.
•$31 million of this is planned as non-city resources such as federal and state
governmental, including Municipal Sate Aid (MSA).
Utility Funds: As previously reviewed and approved, the approximate cumulative effect on a
typical residential property for all the utility rate adjustments would be an increase of
$18.04/quarter, or approximately $6.01 per month. The calculation is based on a household
using 30 units of water per quarter (22,500 gallons), a 20-unit winter sewer average and 60-
gallon solid waste service. As you are aware, we have changes in both our solid waste and
water programs to allow residents the opportunity to lower their own rates by conservation
2019 2020 $ Change % Change
Final Levy Proposed 2019 to 2020 2019 to 2020
TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVY
General Fund (1)26,880,004$ 27,432,167$ 552,163$ 2.05%
Environment and Sustainability (1)- 497,484 497,484
Race Equity and Inclusion (1)- 314,077 314,077
Council programs (1)150,000 150,000
Park Improvement Fund 810,000 860,000 50,000 6.17%
Capital Replacement Fund 1,767,700 1,567,700 (200,000) -11.31%
Debt Service-current 3,420,557 3,799,093 378,536 11.07%
Employee Benefit Fund 150,000 150,000 - 0.00%
Housing Rehabilitation Fund 100,000 - (100,000) -100.00%
33,128,261$ 34,770,521$ 1,642,260$ 4.96%
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 4
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
and reduction in their solid waste amounts. 2019 will provide us time to gather information on
residents’ usage and program changes.
Estimated city impact for 2020 – example on median value home: Based on a 5.61% levy
increase (preliminary levy) on a median value residential homestead property that increased in
value from $275,100 to $297,900, the city’s portion of the property taxes were estimated to
increase by about $73.80 in 2020, or $6.15 per month.
Based on the 4.96% levy increase on a median value residential homestead property that
increased in value from $275,100 to $297,900, the city’s portion of the property taxes are
estimated to increase by about $65.51 in 2020, or $5.46 per month.
2019 Budget amendment: A budget amendment in the general fund for 2019 was council
approving the Wind source agreement with Xcel Energy in 2019. Given the city joined the
program mid-year, the budget change was $57,000. This ongoing 3-year agreement is
budgeted at $98,000 in the various utility budgets in 2020.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 5
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution adopting the 2020 general fund budget, other 2020 budgets and
authorizing the 2020 final property tax levy
Whereas, The City of St. Louis Park is required by Charter and State law to approve a
resolution setting forth an annual tax levy to the Hennepin County Auditor; and
Whereas, Minnesota Statutes currently in force require approval of a property tax levy
and a budget in December of each year; and
Whereas, the City Council has received the budget information;
Now therefore, be it resolved, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, that the
2020 General Fund Budget and 2020 Budgets are adopted as presented; and
Summary of Budgeted Revenues
2019 2020 Dollar Chng.% Change
Adopted Adopted 2019 to 2020 2019 to 2020
General Fund Revenues:
General Property Taxes 26,880,004$ 28,393,728$ 1,513,724$ 5.63%
Licenses and Permits 4,103,424 4,660,811 557,387 13.58%
Intergovernmental 1,760,900 1,760,082 (818) -0.05%
Charges for Services 2,187,319 2,273,824 86,505 3.95%
Fines, Forfeits, and Penalties 279,700 280,000 300 0.11%
Investment Earnings 180,000 210,000 30,000 16.67%
Miscellaneous Revenue 1,696,468 2,077,382 380,914 22.45%
Transfers In 1,999,877 2,038,338 38,461 1.92%
Total General Fund Revenues:39,087,692$ 41,694,165$ 2,606,473$ 6.67%
Summary of Budgeted Expenditures
2019 2020 Dollar Chng.% Change
Adopted Adopted 2019 to 2020 2019 to 2020
General Government 9,603,528$ 9,773,514$ 169,986$ 1.77%
Public Safety 17,703,910 18,591,109 887,199 5.01%
Operations and Recreation 11,705,904 12,292,981 587,077 5.02%
Non-Departmental 74,350 1,036,561 962,211 N/A
Total General Fund 39,087,692$ 41,694,165$ 2,606,473$ 6.67%
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 6
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
2019 2020
Adopted Proposed
Special Revenue
Housing Rehabilitation Fund
Total Housing Rehab Revenues 1,491,809$ 1,379,662$
Total Housing Rehab Expenditures 1,807,364 1,678,496
CDBG Fund
Total CDBG Revenues 167,865 30,000
Total CDBG Expenditures 167,865 30,000
Cable TV Fund
Total Cable TV Revenues 641,500 562,500
Total Cable TV Expenditures 776,199 640,125
Capital Project
Development Fund
Total Development Fund Revenues 5,374,085 5,195,262
Total Development Fund Expenditures 6,659,670 6,101,033
HRA Levy Fund
Total HRA Levy Revenues 1,234,601 1,332,978
Total HRA Levy Expenditures*15,000 1,332,978
Housing Trust Fund***
Total Housing Trust Fund Revenues - 1,045,730
Total Housing Trust Fund Expenditures - -
Enterprise
Water Utility Fund
Total Water Revenues 7,248,775 8,013,623
Total Water Expenses 9,940,985 6,877,695
Sewer Utility Fund
Total Sewer Revenues 7,551,122 7,953,336
Total Sewer Expenses 8,086,093 7,877,000
Solid Waste Utility Fund
Total Solid Waste Revenues 3,580,850 3,692,190
Total Solid Waste Expenses 4,041,204 3,907,820
Storm Water Utility Fund
Total Storm Water Revenues 2,915,014 3,071,482
Total Storm Water Expenses 4,654,990 4,860,842
Internal Service
Employee Administration Fund**
Total Employee Benefits Revenues 534,500 2,827,000
Total Employee Benefits Expenses 1,196,700 2,876,618
Uninsured Loss Fund
Total Uninsured Loss Revenues 204,000 105,000
Total Uninsured Loss Expenses 231,925 243,027
*= interfund loan repayment in 2019 will show up as a reduction to the liability on the balance sheet.
** = included OPEB/Net Pension Liability entries in budget going forward.
*** = Housing trust fund revenue is from HRA levy via transfer.
Special Revenue, Select Capital Project Funds,
Summary of Budgeted Revenues and Expenditures
Enterprise and Internal Service Funds
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 7
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
Be it further resolved, by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, that the following
sums of money be levied in 2019, collectible in 2020, upon the taxable property in said City of
St. Louis Park for the following purposes:
2020
FINAL TAX LEVY
2019 TAX CAPACITY BASED TAX LEVY
General Fund $28,393,728
Debt Service 3,799,093
Capital Replacement Fund 1,567,700
Park Improvement Fund 860,000
Employee Administration Fund 150,000
TOTAL TAX LEVIES $34,770,521
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 8
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution authorizing the 2020 final HRA levy
Whereas, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.090 to 469.108 (the “EDA Act”),
the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park created the St. Louis Park Economic Development
Authority (the "Authority"); and
Whereas, pursuant to the EDA Act, the City Council granted to the Authority all of the
powers and duties of a housing and redevelopment authority under provisions of Minnesota
Statutes, sections 469.001 to 469.047 (the "HRA Act"); and
Whereas, Section 469.033, subdivision 6 of the Act authorizes the Authority to levy a
tax upon all taxable property within the City to be expended for the purposes authorized by the
HRA Act; and
Whereas, such levy may be in an amount not to exceed 0.0185 percent of taxable
market value of the City; and
Whereas, for 2020, the Final HRA Levy amount will be $1,332,978; and
Whereas, the Authority has filed its budget for the special benefit levy in accordance
with the budget procedures of the City; and
Whereas, based upon such budgets the Authority will levy all or such portion of the
authorized levy as it deems necessary and proper;
Now therefore, be it resolved by the St. Louis Park City Council: That approval is hereby
given for the Authority to levy, for taxes payable in 2020, such tax upon the taxable property of
the City as the Authority may determine, subject to the limitations contained in the HRA Act.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a) Page 9
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution adopting the 2020 - 2029
Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Whereas, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, has received a report
from the Chief Financial Officer related to proposed capital spending for 2020 - 2029; and
Whereas, it is necessary for the City to maintain and replace its capital stock in order to
enhance the City’s attractiveness to residents and businesses; and
Whereas, good planning is a necessary part of the stewardship that the City Council and
staff exercise over the capital assets of the City;
Now therefore, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, that:
1.The 2020 - 2029 Capital Improvements Plan is hereby adopted.
2.The City Manager is authorized to purchase or undertake the items included in the fiscal
year 2020 funded portion of the plan as allowed by the City Charter and state statutes.
3.All purchases required to be competitively bid must come before the City Council for final
approval.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the City Council Dec. 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Capital Improvement Program
City of St. Louis Park, MN
FUNDING SOURCE SUMMARY
2020 2029thru
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029
BSM 250,000250,000
Cable TV - Time Warner Equipment Grant 362,90051,400 1,500 7,000 33,000 270,000
Capital Replacement Fund 42,263,8513,301,101 4,349,740 3,569,598 4,411,481 3,262,685 4,146,271 4,445,674 5,252,605 5,134,003 4,390,693
E-911 Funds 683,33053,217 28,578 30,007 181,507 113,082 34,736 36,473 38,297 40,211 127,222
EDA Development Fund 1,586,9271,386,927 200,000
G.O. Bonds 45,705,0538,223,269 3,344,118 3,968,424 7,505,782 5,588,360 4,205,700 8,904,875 2,345,350 792,050 827,125
Hockey Association 1,000,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Met Council Grant 2,700,0002,700,000
Municipal State Aid 23,043,7926,073,042 1,687,500 5,000,000 2,056,250 2,212,500 983,250 3,651,250 1,380,000
Park Improvement Fund 12,986,0001,113,000 2,507,500 1,313,500 1,280,000 1,330,000 1,313,000 587,000 1,850,000 1,251,000 441,000
Pavement Management Fund 47,311,9705,395,993 3,919,138 5,847,142 4,105,604 5,543,626 5,077,000 3,975,805 4,476,096 5,199,339 3,772,227
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund 1,295,000555,000 370,000 370,000
Police & Fire Pension 1,475,000201,500 43,500 43,500 321,500 357,000 254,500 253,500
Police Budget 264,00060,000 60,000 24,000 60,000 60,000
PW Operations Budget 3,090,509385,310 306,000 312,358 336,346 312,113 314,000 325,895 355,004 335,310 108,173
Sanitary Sewer Utility 10,791,5001,409,750 1,119,250 928,000 1,006,500 1,032,500 1,061,000 1,073,250 1,033,000 1,105,750 1,022,500
Solid Waste Utility 140,0008,000 58,000 8,000 8,000 13,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 13,000
State of Minnesota 2,400,0001,050,000 180,000 1,170,000
Stormwater Utility 26,058,6493,243,549 3,006,550 1,719,450 4,082,850 1,928,450 2,867,050 1,696,250 2,843,500 2,149,000 2,522,000
Tax Increment - Elmwood 4,289,0004,289,000
U.S. Government 3,478,4002,918,400 560,000
Unfunded 3,300,524552,487 250,000 1,000,000 927,058 441,026 129,953
Water Utility 30,732,7332,647,356 3,786,755 2,613,850 2,834,875 3,311,959 3,190,100 3,267,719 3,095,044 3,234,075 2,751,000
40,816,814 25,070,616 25,679,829 31,947,445 26,613,025 265,209,138GRAND TOTAL 23,498,415 27,387,967 22,510,099 24,229,988 17,454,940
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 10
Capital Improvement Program
City of St. Louis Park, MN
PROJECTS BY FUNDING SOURCE
2020 2029thru
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
BSM
250,000250,000Tennis Court Total Reconstruction -
Aquila Park
21230301 n/a
BSM Total 250,000250,000
Cable TV - Time Warner Equipment
20,00020,000Van Camera Cases 11151002 3
13,00013,000Van Camera Cables 11151003 3
10,00010,000Tripods for On Location 11151007 3
40,00040,000Council Chambers HD pan/tilt
cameras
11172007 1
1,5001,500Tripods111910081
35,00035,000Replacement edit systems 11191009 1
140,000140,000Van Cameras 11201001 3
20,00020,000Van Camera Cases 11201002 3
13,00013,000Van Camera Cables 11201003 3
15,00015,000LCD monitors 11201004 3
2,5002,500Hard-Drive Video Recorder 11201008 1
12,00012,000Tripods for On Location 11201010 1
4,2004,200SD/HD converter 11201011 1
1,5001,500DVD recorder 11201013 1
28,20028,200Playback systems 11201014 1
7,0007,000Production switcher 11201015 1
Cable TV - Time Warner Equipment Grant Total 362,90051,400 1,500 7,000 33,000 270,000
Capital Replacement Fund
75,00025,000 25,000 25,000IR: PCI Re-Assessment / Training /
Security
13125001 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 11
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
970,00097,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000 97,000IR: Hosted / Managed Services / DR
/ BC
13135001 3
20,00020,000OR: AVL / GPS 13135004 3
290,000290,000Police: New CAD/RMS/Mobile Suite 13145010 3
500,00050,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 130,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000Admin Serv:Document Mgmt System
Maintenance
13155006 3
20,00020,000IR: MyStLouisPark CRM 13155007 1
150,000150,000IR: City Hall Council Chambers AV
Upgrade
13155008 1
15,00015,000Eng: Survey GPS 13155016 3
30,00010,000 10,000 10,000Police: Zuercher Crime View
Dashboard
13155020 3
110,00011,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000IR: Website Maintenance 13165004 1
48,00016,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000Admin Serv: HR Time Management
System
13165007 3
262,00064,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000 22,000Insp / Comm Dev: Project Dox CD
Use and Upgrade
13165009 3
25,00025,000Eng: GPS Base Station 13175001 3
8,0008,000Eng: Trimble R2 GPS Receiver 13175004 3
60,00030,000 30,000IR: Wireless Controller Expansion 13175006 1
200,000200,000Admin Serv: Financial / HR/Payroll
App Replacement
13185001 1
11,00011,000Fire: Zuercher Mobile Solution 13185002 3
35,00010,000 15,000 10,000Fire: Station Cameras / EOC in 2025 13185003 3
50,00050,000IR: Office 365 Project
Implementation & Training
13185004 3
95,00095,000Insp: PIMS / PDS Upgrades 13185005 1
40,00020,000 20,000IR: Network Equipment Battery
(UPS) Backup
13185009 1
50,00050,000Fire: 800 MHz Paging Upgrade 13205001 3
16,00016,000OR: Trimble R2 GPS Receivers (2)13215003 3
3,000,000300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000IR: On-going Software Licenses,
Mtce, Development
13995001 1
1,250,000125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000 125,000IR: On-going Network Adds &
Replacement
13995002 1
1,050,000100,000 110,000 100,000 100,000 110,000 110,000 110,000 100,000 110,000 100,000IR: On-going Hardware Adds &
Replacement
13995003 1
189,00080,000 61,000 48,000Police: 800 MHz Mobile Police
Radios
13995004 1
195,00025,000 145,000 25,000Police: Squad Computers / Cellular
Service
13995006 1
35,00035,000Eng: Engineering Total Station 13995010 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 12
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
45,00015,000 15,000 15,000IR: EOC Computer / Phone
Equipment Replacement
13995013 3
2,865,968250,000 257,500 265,225 273,182 281,377 289,818 298,513 307,468 316,692 326,193IR: Tablet / Smartphone Hardware
and Services
13995015 1
38,00019,000 19,000Facilities: City Hall Cameras 13995016 3
250,00025,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000Admin Serv - Hubble Budgeting
Annual Maintenance
13995017 3
25,00025,000Police: Jail Cameras (17)13995021 1
20,00020,000Police: Non-Jail Cameras 13995022 1
55,00055,000Police: Dispatch Camera Viewing
Workstations
13995024 1
160,00016,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000IR: Surveillance Camera and S2
Locks Maintenance
13995026 3
68,0006,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800 6,800IR: Central City Hall Plotter (Lease)13995029 3
60,00060,000IR: Telephone Handset / Handless
Upgrades
13995035 3
71,6005,700 13,000 5,700 13,000 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700 5,700IR: Remote Building Large Scanner /
Plotter
13995036 3
60,00060,000Fire: Stations A/V and EOC
Presentation Equipment
13995037 3
6,5006,500Police: Interview Room Cameras 13995040 1
50,00010,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000IR: Wireless Hotspot Additions /
Replacements
13995041 3
25,5008,500 8,500 8,500Police: Specialized Dictation System 13995056 1
70,00035,000 35,000IR: UHL Camera Servers
Replacement - City Hall
13995057 3
150,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000IR: Adobe Software Products
Licensing
13995058 1
80,00080,000IR: On-Going Monitor Replacements 13995059 1
495,00045,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000IR: Fiber Locates 13995065 1
200,00020,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000IR: Fiber Asset Management 13995066 3
1,265,000117,500 132,500 117,500 117,500 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000 130,000Police: Body and Squad Dash
Cameras
13995067 3
120,00012,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000 12,000Admin Serv: Tungsten Elec
Accounts Payable
13995068 3
20,00010,000 10,000SWAT Rifle replacement 20180001 1
14,0007,000 7,000SWAT Ballistic Shields 20180003 1
00City Hall Garage Overhead Doors 31150001 1
95,00095,000City Hall Floor 3 Roof Top AC Unit 31170003 1
80,00080,000City Hall Timber Retaining Walls 31200001 1
85,00085,000City Hall Bridge 31200003 3
32,00015,000 17,000City Hall/Police Campus Landscaping 31210001 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 13
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
35,00035,000City Hall 2nd Floor Celing Tile
Replacement
31210002 5
25,00025,000City Hall ITE & Gould Elect Panel
Replacement
31230001 3
35,00035,000City Hall Generator Head Gasket 31240001 1
8,0008,000City Hall Stair Carpet Replacement 31240002 5
200,000200,000CH Windows, Ext. Coatings and
Caulking Replacement
31250001 n/a
15,00015,000City Hall Window Blinds 31250002 5
35,00035,000City Hall First Floor Carpet
Replacement
31260001 3
100,000100,000CH Access Control System
Replacement, City Wide
31260002 3
15,00015,000CH Update HVAC Controls 31270002 3
20,00020,000Police Parking and Training
Feasability Study
32180004 3
65,00065,000Police StationShooting Range
Exhaust
32190002 1
10,00010,000Police Lobby Furniture 32190003 1
30,00030,000Police- Replace Ceiling Tiles 32210002 3
30,00030,000Police Station Replace Light Fixtures 32210003 3
140,000140,000PD Indivdual Office & Conf Room
Remodel
32210004 3
25,00025,000Police Report Writing Room Remodel 32220002 3
85,00085,000Police Station Remodel Restrooms 32220003 1
15,00015,000Police Station Entry Planter Brick
Face
32220004 3
50,00050,000Police Parking Gate 32230001 5
25,00025,000Police Station Blind Replacement 32240002 3
15,00015,000Police Station Exercise Equipment
Replacement
32250001 5
65,00065,000Police Station Exterior Masonry
Maintenance
32270001 3
18,00018,000Police Station Water Heaters 32270002 1
12,00012,000PD Replace HVAC Controls 32270003 3
90,00090,000Police Locker Replacement 32280001 3
35,00035,000Police Replace Training Room
Divider
32290001 5
75,00015,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000MSC & Fire Stations CO Nox Sensor
Replacement
33140002 1
20,00020,000MSC Convert Exterior HID to LED 33200001 3
50,00050,000MSC 2nd Bay-Sealant 33200003 3
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 14
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
85,00085,000MSC Fuel Station Replacement 33200004 3
25,00025,000MSC Paint Booth Maintenance 33210002 3
12,00012,000MSC Replace HVAC Controls 33210003 3
40,00040,000MSC Exterior Fence 33210004 3
20,00020,000MSC Traffic Shop Floor Coating 33210005 5
50,00050,000MSC 3rd Bay Sealant and Stripping 33210006 1
600,000600,000MSC Bays 1, 2 & 3 Roofing 33220001 3
23,00011,000 12,000MSC Campus Landscaping 33220002 3
250,000250,000MSC Heat Exchanger Ventilation 33230002 3
150,000150,000MSC Hoist Replacement 33230003 1
100,000100,000MSC Boiler Replacement 33240002 3
18,00018,000MSC Carpet Replacement 33250001 3
100,000100,000MSC Bays LED Upgrade 33250002 3
250,000250,000MSC Office Remodel 33280001 3
85,00085,000MSC Roof Top HVAC Units 33290001 3
120,000120,000Fire Stations 1 & 2 Apparatus bay
floor coating
34160002 1
50,00050,000Fire Station #1 Training Tower
modifications
34190001 5
15,00015,000Fire Station 1&2 Mattress
replacement
34190005 1
110,000110,000Fire Station 1 Decontamination
Laundry
34190006 3
35,00035,000Fire Stations Replace Exercise
Equipment
34200001 5
12,00012,000Fire Stations Replace HVAC Controls 34200003 3
15,00015,000Fire Station #1 and #2 Landscaping 34240001 1
18,00018,000Fire 1&2 Water Heaters 34240002 3
35,00035,000FS #1 and #2 Carpet Replacement 3424001 1
60,00060,000Fire Station #1 light fixture
replacements
34260001 1
100,000100,000Fire Station Office Furniture 34270001 3
80,00080,000Fire 1&2 Boilers 34280001 3
120,000120,000Fire 1&2 AC 34290001 3
20,00020,000Fire 1&2 Mattresses 34290002 3
45,00045,000Fire Station #2 Replace light fixtures 35250001 1
140,000140,000Rec Center Remodel Offices 37290001 5
64,00011,500 11,500 11,500 29,500Laser/Radar and Message Board 60990001 3
24,0008,000 8,000 8,000Thermal Imagers 65990001 1
63,00021,000 21,000 21,000Outside Warning Sirens 65990002 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 15
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
373,283373,283SCBA659900031
30,00030,000Hydraulic Rescue Tool 65990004 5
105,00050,000 55,000Auto-CPR Device 65990005 1
150,000150,000Turnouts659900061
35,00035,000Helmets/Boots 65990007 3
12,5006,000 6,500Air Monitors 65990008 3
21,975,5001,499,601 2,254,440 1,879,873 1,868,216 1,519,808 1,350,453 2,468,661 3,603,137 3,031,311 2,500,000Annual Equipment Replacement
Program
E - XX01 1
Capital Replacement Fund Total 42,263,8513,301,101 4,349,740 3,569,598 4,411,481 3,262,685 4,146,271 4,445,674 5,252,605 5,134,003 4,390,693
E-911 Funds
165,00080,000 85,000Fire / Police: Dispatch Voice
Recorders
13995007 1
342,33027,217 28,578 30,007 31,507 33,082 34,736 36,473 38,297 40,211 42,222Police: Zuercher CAD Module
Annual Fees
13995042 1
150,000150,000911 Server Replacement 13995069 1
26,00026,000UPS PSAP Power Backup System 202000001 1
E-911 Funds Total 683,33053,217 28,578 30,007 181,507 113,082 34,736 36,473 38,297 40,211 127,222
EDA Development Fund
400,000200,000 200,000SWLRT: Stations Technology 13995051 3
666,666666,666SWLRT- Base Design 40199000 1
445,261445,261SWLRT- LRCI 32 - CSAH 25 @
Beltline Blvd.
40199003 1
75,00075,000Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Monterey)
40201101 1
EDA Development Fund Total 1,586,9271,386,927 200,000
G.O. Bonds
250,00025,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000IR: Fiber / Handhole Infrastructure
Relocations
13995071 1
700,000700,000Rec Center West Arena Roof
Replacement
24255010 1
1,000,0001,000,000Rec Center Boiler Replacement 24265004 1
480,750480,750Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40181050 1
2,140,3002,140,300Bridge - Louisiana Ave @
Minnehaha Creek
40181700 1
4,387,6004,387,600CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40192000 3
558,682558,682SWLRT- Regional Trail Bridge
Upgrades
40199004 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 16
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
380,937380,937Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40201000 1
977,500250,000 727,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Monterey)
40201101 1
1,116,6181,116,618Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40211000 1
1,112,5001,112,500CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40212000 3
362,500362,500CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40212001 3
740,924740,924Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40221000 1
2,377,5002,377,500CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40222000 3
575,000575,000Street- W 36th Street Reconstruction 40226000 1
714,271714,271Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40231000 1
1,751,0361,751,036Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
Texas to Kentucky)
40231100 1
2,715,4752,715,475Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Louisiana Ave)
40231101 1
2,050,0002,050,000CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40232000 3
4,010,000250,000 250,000 1,220,000 2,290,000County - Mtka Blvd (Hwy 100 to
France)
40237000 1
818,973818,973Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40241000 1
1,816,1141,816,114Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
TH169 to Texas)
40241100 1
1,708,2731,708,273CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40242000 3
538,200538,200Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40251000 1
1,352,5001,352,500CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40252000 3
554,875554,875Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40261000 1
6,625,0006,625,000CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40262000 3
614,100614,100Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40271000 1
1,706,2501,706,250CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40272000 3
479,550479,550Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40281000 1
287,500287,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge)
40281100 1
802,125802,125Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40291000 1
G.O. Bonds Total 45,705,0538,223,269 3,344,118 3,968,424 7,505,782 5,588,360 4,205,700 8,904,875 2,345,350 792,050 827,125
Hockey Association
1,000,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000Outdoor Refrigerated Ice Rink 24145019 5
Hockey Association Total 1,000,000100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 17
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
Met Council Grant
2,700,0002,700,000SWLRT- Park and Ride Ramp at
Beltline Station
40199006 1
Met Council Grant Total 2,700,0002,700,000
Municipal State Aid
5,491,7925,491,792Bridge - Louisiana Ave @
Minnehaha Creek
40181700 1
2,268,750581,250 1,687,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Monterey)
40201101 1
1,731,2501,731,250Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
Texas to Kentucky)
40231100 1
3,268,7503,268,750Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Louisiana Ave)
40231101 1
2,056,2502,056,250Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
TH169 to Texas)
40241100 1
2,212,5002,212,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard
area)
40261100 1
983,250983,250Street - MSA Street Rehab (W28th
St)
40271100 1
3,651,2503,651,250Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge)
40281100 1
1,380,0001,380,000Street - MSA Street Rehab (TBD)40291100 1
Municipal State Aid Total 23,043,7926,073,042 1,687,500 5,000,000 2,056,250 2,212,500 983,250 3,651,250 1,380,000
Park Improvement Fund
80,0008,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000OR: Asset Mgmt Software 13995011 3
60,00010,000 50,000OR: Nature Center Surveillance
Cameras
13995019 3
160,00030,000 50,000 30,000 50,000OR: Rec Center / ROC / Lot Camera
Replacements
13995025 1
60,0005,000 25,000 5,000 25,000OR: Oak Hill Camera/Security/Wi-Fi
Replacements
13995052 3
34,00011,000 12,000 11,000OR: Park Shelter (Smaller) Camera
Replacements
13995053 3
10,0005,000 5,000OR: Wolfe Park / Amphitheatre /
Pool Wi-Fi Replace
13995054 3
30,00030,000OR: Birchwood Cameras / S2
Security
13995060 3
15,00015,000OR: Wolfe Park Pavilion S2 /
Amphitheatre Cameras
13995061 3
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 18
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
65,00065,000OR: Rec Banquet Room & Gallery
A/V System Replace.
13995064 1
45,00015,000 15,000 15,000OR: Rec POS Stations 13995070 3
50,00050,00040th & France Fencing & Parking Lot 21193202 3
15,00015,000Trail Reconstruction - Bronx Park 21200912 1
300,000300,000Dakota Park LED Baseball Field
Light Replacement
21201801 3
35,00035,000ADA Trail Compliance 21202401 1
15,00015,000Trail Reconstruction - Keystone Park 21203013 1
10,00010,000Louisiana Oaks Park & Hwy 7
Interchange Landscape
21203603 1
135,000135,000Tennis Court Rebuild - Northside
Park
21204301 3
15,00015,000Trail Reconstruction - Northside Park 21204314 1
15,00015,000ADA Compliant - Picnic Tables 21209901 1
15,00015,000Historical Society Depot Renovation 21209902 n/a
194,500194,500Trail Reconstruction - Bass Lake
Park
21210411 3
165,000165,000Carpenter Park LED Ballfield
Replacement
21211101 3
10,00010,000Batting Cages - Cedar Knoll Park /
Carlson Field
21211303 1
55,00055,000Trail Reconstruction - Louisiana
Oaks Park
21213614 3
65,00065,000Trail Reconstruction - Oak Hill Park 21214415 3
500,00010,000 490,000Webster Park Construction 21216101 n/a
75,00075,000Trail Reconstruction - Wolfe Park 21216416 3
35,00035,000Trail Reconstruction - Franklin 21219912 3
24,00024,000Trail Reconstruction - Jordan 21219913 3
50,00050,000Trail Reconstruction - Minnehaha
Creek
21224109 3
250,000250,000Tennis Court Total Reconstruction -
Aquila Park
21230301 n/a
35,00035,000Browndale Park Hardcourt 21231001 n/a
30,00030,000Trail Reconstruction - Otten Pond 21234611 3
10,00010,000Trail Reconstruction - Roxbury Park 21235112 3
10,00010,000Trail Reconstruction - Twin Lakes
Park
21235813 3
2,0002,000Repaint Park Building - Cedar Knoll
Park
21240130 1
7,0007,000Repaint Park Building - Aquila Park 21240306 1
75,00075,000Trail Reconstruction - Aquila Park 21240317 3
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 19
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
7,0007,000Repaint Park Building - Birchwood
Park
21240607 1
7,0007,000Repaint Park Building - Browndale
Park
21241008 1
6,0006,000Repaint Park Building - Carpenter
Park
21241109 1
50,00050,000Trail Reconstruction - Carpenter Park 21241118 3
4,0004,000Repaint Park Building - Dakota Park 21241811 1
5,0005,000Repaint Park Building - Fern Hill Park 21242112 1
30,00030,000Trail Reconstruction - Jersey Park 21242719 1
7,0007,000Repaint Park Building - Louisiana
Oaks Park
21243613 1
7,0007,000Repaint Park Building - Nelson Park 21244214 1
6,0006,000Repaint Park Building - Northside
Park
21244315 1
9,0009,000Repaint Park Building - Oak Hill Park 21244416 1
40,00040,000Trail Reconstruction - Lamplighter
Park
21253401 3
30,00030,000Trail Reconstruction - Westwood
Hills NC
21256202 3
100,000100,000Wolfe Park Amphitheater Pavers 21256403 3
100,000100,000Trail Reconstruction 21259903 3
150,000150,000Park Shelter Replacement 21259905 3
100,000100,000Trail Lighting 21259906 3
130,000130,000Trail from Hampshire Park to Otten
Pond
21269903 n/a
17,50017,500Court Resurface - Carpenter tennis
courts
21271105 3
17,50017,500Court Resurface - Wolfe Park (Pklbll
& Bsktbll)
21276403 3
200,000200,000Park Building Upgrades 21279903 3
300,000300,000Cedar Knoll Park - Carlson Field
LED replacement
21281301 3
112,000112,000Aquila Park LED Ballfield
Replacement
21290301 3
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Ainsworth
Park
21990101 1
100,000100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Aquila Park 21990301 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Bronx Park 21990902 1
75,00075,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Browndale
Park
21991002 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Carpenter
Park
21991102 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 20
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Cedarhurst
Park
21991503 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Center Park 21991604 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Parkview
Park
21991712 1
67,00067,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Dakota Park 21991801 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Edgebrook
Park
21991918 1
85,00085,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Fern Hill Park 21992110 1
67,00067,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Hampshire
Park
21992401 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Jackley Park 21992611 1
67,00067,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Jersey Park 21992706 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Jorvig Park 21992801 1
67,00067,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Justad Park 21992907 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Knollwood
Green
21993217 1
100,000100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Louisiana
Oaks Park
21993601 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Minikahda
Vista Park
21994002 1
67,00067,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Nelson Park 21994205 1
67,00067,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Oak Hill
Park (Tot)
21994402 1
100,000100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Oak Hill
Park (Big)
21994403 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Oregon Park 21994502 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl -
Pennsylvania Park
21994803 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Sunset Park 21995403 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Texa-Tonka
Park
21995607 1
65,00065,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Webster Park 21996112 1
100,000100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Westwood
Hills NC
21996204 1
100,000100,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Wolfe Park 21996401 1
95,50095,500Playground Eqpt Repl - Wolfe Park
EVOS
21996402 1
67,00067,000Playground Eqpt Repl - Wolfe Park
(tot)
21996403 1
120,00020,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Playground Woodchips 21999902 1
125,000125,000Trail Restoration 21999907 3
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 21
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
15,00015,000Minnehaha Creek Invasive Plant
Removal
22204110 1
450,00075,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000Tree Replacement 22999901 3
100,00020,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000Buckthorn Management 22999903 3
40,00040,000Westwood Hills NC Rotary Deck
Rebuild
23206201 1
25,00025,000Westwood Hills NC Trail Bench
Replacement
23206214 1
40,00040,000Westwood Hills NC Staircase Rebuild 23216216 1
75,00075,000Westwood Hills NC Water Garden,
Phase 2
23226210 5
50,00050,000Westwood Hills NC Boardwalk Deck
Repl, Phase 3
23246220 1
100,000100,000Westwood Hills NC Boardwalk Deck
Repl, Phase 1
23256203 3
50,00050,000Westwood Hills NC Waterfall 23256204 5
30,00030,000Westwood Hills NC Trail Sign
Replacement
23266202 1
10,00010,000Westwood Hills NC Waterfall Deck
Redecking
23286203 1
35,00020,000 15,000Westwood Hillls NC Master
Revegetation Plan
23996227 3
75,00075,000Rec Center Banquet Room AC
Replacement
24205003 1
200,000200,000Rec Center Signage 24205008 3
10,00010,000Rec Center Rental Skate
Replacement (Ph 1)
24205011 1
20,00020,000Rec Center Electric Vehicle Station
Addition
24215003 1
50,00050,000Rec Center Parking Lot Light
Replacement
24215004 1
530,000530,000Rec Center Parking Lot Replacement 24215005 1
250,000250,000Rec Center Arena Rubber Floor 24215007 1
10,00010,000Rec Center Rental Skate
Replacement (Ph 2)
242150110 1
50,00050,000Rec Center Lighting
Upgrade/Electrical Improvement
24215018 1
60,00060,000Rec Center East Arena Painting 24225006 1
25,00025,000Rec Center Skate Sharpener 24225010 1
75,00075,000Rec Center Arena Water Treatment
Repl
24235008 1
75,00075,000Rec Center West Arena Painting 24235009 1
400,000400,000Rec Center East Arena
Dehumidification
24245003 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 22
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
500,000500,000Rec Center Generator Replacement 24245004 1
25,00025,000Rec Center Banquet Room Carpet
Replacement
24255003 3
100,000100,000Rec Center West Arena Roof
Replacement
24255010 1
100,000100,000Rec Center West Arena Locker
Room Remodel
24265003 3
150,000150,000Rec Center Restroom Plumbing 24275001 n/a
300,000300,000Rec Center Tile Lobby 24275002 n/a
150,000150,000Rec Center Cooling Tower
Replacement
24275003 1
75,00075,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Sun
Shelter Addition
24275010 1
450,000150,000 150,000 150,000Rec Center Dasher Board
Replacement
24995003 1
30,00015,000 15,000Rec Center Arena Compressor
Rebuild
24995006 1
150,00025,000 50,000 75,000Rec Center Dasher Board Repair 24995008 3
155,00020,000 15,000 20,000 15,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 25,000Rec Center Landscaping (woodchips)24995017 3
25,00025,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Main Drain
Replacement
25200217 1
200,000200,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Entrance
Remodel
25205005 3
10,00010,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Feasibility
Study
25210203 3
100,000100,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Locker
Room Remodel
25220205 3
100,000100,000Rec Center Aquatic Park
Rehabilitation
25235003 1
100,000100,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Slide
Recoating
25240203 1
75,00075,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Umbrella &
Sun Shltr Rplcm
25270203 3
100,000100,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Feature(s)25270204 3
50,00010,000 10,000 15,000 15,000Rec Center Aquatic Park Deck
Furniture
25990212 1
10,0005,000 5,000Rec Center Aquatic Park
Concession Eqpt. Rplcmt
25990215 3
50,00050,000ROC Storage 27226601 n/a
75,00075,000ROC Sport Court Addition 27236603 3
150,000150,000ROC Restrooms 27276601 n/a
30,00010,000 10,000 10,000ROC Roof Assessment 27996603 1
175,00080,000 95,000ROC Turf Replacement 27996604 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 23
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
Park Improvement Fund Total 12,986,0001,113,000 2,507,500 1,313,500 1,280,000 1,330,000 1,313,000 587,000 1,850,000 1,251,000 441,000
Pavement Management Fund
1,192,5101,192,510Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40181050 1
38,14438,144Bridge - Louisiana Ave @
Minnehaha Creek
40181700 1
108,749108,749Parking Lot - Lake St & Walker 40191600 1
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40200003 1
3,047,5003,047,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40201000 1
427,790427,790Street - Maintenance Project (Area
4)
40201200 1
75,00075,000Traffic Signal - FYA & Control
Cabinets
40201300 1
423,800423,800Alley Construction 40201500 3
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40210003 1
3,335,0003,335,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40211000 1
450,450450,450Alley Construction 40211500 3
38,58838,588Parking Lot - City Hall Lower 40211600 3
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40220003 1
3,369,5003,369,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40221000 1
1,610,0001,610,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40221050 1
335,342335,342Street - Maintenance Project (Area 6)40221200 1
449,800449,800Alley Construction 40221500 3
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40230003 1
2,553,0002,553,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40231000 1
440,454440,454Street -Maintenance Project (Area 7)40231200 1
397,150397,150Alley Construction 40231500 3
632,500632,500Bridge - 34th Street @ Minnehaha
Creek
40231700 1
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40240003 1
3,507,5003,507,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40241000 1
1,012,0001,012,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40241050 1
490,787490,787Street - Maintenance Project (Area 8)40241200 1
274,300274,300Alley Construction 40241500 3
70,62070,620Parking Lot - MSC 40241600 3
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40250003 1
3,588,0003,588,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40251000 1
667,000667,000Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40251050 1
453,200453,200Street - Maintenance Project (Area 1)40251200 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 24
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
268,450268,450Alley Construction 40251500 3
17,85017,850Parking Lot - Fire Stn #1 40251601 3
12,60012,600Parking Lot - Fire Stn #2 40251602 3
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40260003 1
2,219,5002,219,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40261000 1
837,500837,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard
area)
40261100 1
498,305498,305Street - Maintenance Project (Area 2)40261200 1
338,000338,000Alley Construction 40261500 3
105,919105,919Parking Lot - Louisiana Park & Ride
(N&S)
40261600 5
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40270003 1
4,094,0004,094,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40271000 1
299,596299,596Street - Maintenance Project (Area 3)40271200 1
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40280003 1
3,197,0003,197,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40281000 1
489,590489,590Street - Maintenance Project (Area
4)
40281200 1
1,430,2491,430,249Bridge - Meadowbrook @
Minnehaha Creek
40281700 1
82,50082,500Concrete Replacement - SW-C&G-
CB
40290003 1
3,208,5003,208,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40291000 1
481,227481,227Street - Maintenance Project (Area
5)
40291200 1
Pavement Management Fund Total 47,311,9705,395,993 3,919,138 5,847,142 4,105,604 5,543,626 5,077,000 3,975,805 4,476,096 5,199,339 3,772,227
Permanent Improvement Revolving F
555,000555,000Street Light Replacement, SSD1
(2020)
50204110 1
370,000370,000Street Light Replacement, SSD2
(2022)
50224110 1
370,000370,000Street Light Replacement, SSD3
(2024)
50244110 1
Permanent Improvement Revolving Fund Total 1,295,000555,000 370,000 370,000
Police & Fire Pension
110,000110,000Police: New CAD/RMS/Mobile Suite 13145010 3
70,00010,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000Police: Zuercher Crime View
Dashboard
13155020 3
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 25
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
18,00018,000Fire: Zuercher Mobile / Image Trend
Hardware
13175009 3
556,00078,000 287,000 91,000 100,000Police: 800 MHz Mobile Police
Radios
13995004 1
295,00025,000 25,000 25,000 145,000 25,000 25,000 25,000Police: Squad Computers / Cellular
Service
13995006 1
25,00025,000Police: Jail Cameras (17)13995021 1
20,00020,000Police: Non-Jail Cameras 13995022 1
55,00055,000Police: Dispatch Camera Viewing
Workstations
13995024 1
6,5006,500Police: Interview Room Cameras 13995040 1
260,000140,000 120,000Police: Command Van (2020) and
EOC AV Equip (2025)
13995043 3
59,5008,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500 8,500Police: Specialized Dictation System 13995056 1
Police & Fire Pension Total 1,475,000201,500 43,500 43,500 321,500 357,000 254,500 253,500
Police Budget
24,00024,000SWAT Robot 20180002 3
240,00060,000 60,000 60,000 60,000Police-ALPR replacement 61990001 3
Police Budget Total 264,00060,000 60,000 24,000 60,000 60,000
PW Operations Budget
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40200003 1
4,8104,810Street - Maintenance Project (Area
4)
40201200 1
94,00094,000Traffic Signal - FYA & Control
Cabinets
40201300 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40210003 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40220003 1
14,85814,858Street - Maintenance Project (Area 6)40221200 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40230003 1
33,34633,346Street -Maintenance Project (Area 7)40231200 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40240003 1
3,6133,613Street - Maintenance Project (Area 8)40241200 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40250003 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40260003 1
6,3956,395Street - Maintenance Project (Area 2)40261200 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40270003 1
30,00430,004Street - Maintenance Project (Area 3)40271200 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 26
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40280003 1
4,8104,810Street - Maintenance Project (Area
4)
40281200 1
95,00095,000Concrete Replacement - SW-C&G-
CB
40290003 1
13,17313,173Street - Maintenance Project (Area
5)
40291200 1
175,000175,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2020)
50204101 1
16,50016,500Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2020)50204301 3
180,000180,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2021)
50214101 1
17,00017,000Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2021)50214301 3
14,00014,000Replace Salt Brine Maker 50214401 3
185,000185,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2022)
50224101 1
17,50017,500Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2022)50224301 3
190,000190,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2023)
50234101 1
18,00018,000Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2023)50234301 3
195,000195,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2024)
50244101 1
18,50018,500Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2024)50244301 3
200,000200,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2025)
50254101 1
19,00019,000Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2025)50254301 3
205,000205,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2026)
50264101 3
19,50019,500Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2026)50264301 3
210,000210,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2027)
50274101 3
20,00020,000Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2027)50274301 3
215,000215,000Street Light Annual Replacement
(2028)
50284101 3
20,50020,500Traffic Signal Annual Painting (2028)50284301 3
PW Operations Budget Total 3,090,509385,310 306,000 312,358 336,346 312,113 314,000 325,895 355,004 335,310 108,173
Sanitary Sewer Utility
51,00051,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App
Replacement
13195001 1
160,00016,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000OR: Asset Mgmt Software 13995011 3
10,0005,000 5,000OR: MSC Cameras 13995031 3
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 27
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40201000 1
300,000131,250 168,750Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Monterey)
40201101 1
500,000500,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40203000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40211000 1
520,000520,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40213000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40221000 1
57,50057,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40221050 1
540,000540,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40223000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40231000 1
57,50057,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
Texas to Kentucky)
40231100 1
57,50057,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Louisiana Ave)
40231101 1
560,000560,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40233000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40241000 1
57,50057,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40241050 1
57,50057,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
TH169 to Texas)
40241100 1
580,000580,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40243000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40251000 1
57,50057,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40251050 1
600,000600,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40253000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40261000 1
118,750118,750Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard
area)
40261100 1
620,000620,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40263000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40271000 1
57,50057,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (W28th
St)
40271100 1
640,000640,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40273000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40281000 1
57,50057,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge)
40281100 1
51,75051,750Bridge - Meadowbrook @
Minnehaha Creek
40281700 1
660,000660,000Sanitary Sewer- Mainline Rehab 40283000 1
287,500287,500Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40291000 1
680,000680,000Sanitary Sewer - Mainline Rehab 40293000 1
400,000400,000Upgrade SCADA Control System
(2018-2020)
53185006 3
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 28
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
100,00050,000 50,000GIS Survey of Utility Lines (2020-21)53205002 3
25,00025,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53205153 3
26,00026,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53215153 3
27,00027,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53225153 3
28,00028,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53235153 3
29,00029,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53245153 3
70,00070,000Sanitary Lift Station: Replace MCC
(LS-19)
53255104 3
30,00030,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53255153 3
31,00031,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53265153 3
32,00032,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53275153 3
33,00033,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53285153 3
34,00034,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53295153 3
Sanitary Sewer Utility Total 10,791,5001,409,750 1,119,250 928,000 1,006,500 1,032,500 1,061,000 1,073,250 1,033,000 1,105,750 1,022,500
Solid Waste Utility
50,00050,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App
Replacement
13195001 1
80,0008,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000OR: Asset Mgmt Software 13995011 3
10,0005,000 5,000OR: MSC Cameras 13995031 3
Solid Waste Utility Total 140,0008,000 58,000 8,000 8,000 13,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 13,000
State of Minnesota
1,050,0001,050,000Bridge - Louisiana Ave @
Minnehaha Creek
40181700 1
180,000180,000Bridge - 34th Street @ Minnehaha
Creek
40231700 1
1,170,0001,170,000Bridge - Meadowbrook @
Minnehaha Creek
40281700 1
State of Minnesota Total 2,400,0001,050,000 180,000 1,170,000
Stormwater Utility
51,00051,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App
Replacement
13195001 1
20,00010,000 10,000OR: MSC Cameras 13995031 3
24,45524,455Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40181050 1
320,539320,539Bridge - Louisiana Ave @
Minnehaha Creek
40181700 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 29
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
105,055105,055Storm Water- Oregon Pond Basin
Rehab
40184000 1
59,80059,800Storm Water- Sumter Pond Rehab 40194000 1
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40200003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40201000 1
312,500187,500 125,000Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Monterey)
40201101 1
228,200228,200Alley Construction 40201500 3
34,00034,000Storm Water- Klodt Pond WQ
Improvements
40204000 1
999,000999,000Storm Water - Hannon Lift station 40204001 3
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40204500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40210003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40211000 1
242,550242,550Alley Construction 40211500 3
1,725,0001,725,000Storm Water- Webster Park WQ
Improvements
40214001 3
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40214500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40220003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40221000 1
287,500287,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40221050 1
242,200242,200Alley Construction 40221500 3
86,25086,250Storm Water- Minnehaha Creek
Equalizer Pipe
40224000 3
287,500287,500Storm Water- Westdale Sed Basin
Rehab
40224001 1
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40224500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40230003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40231000 1
287,500287,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
Texas to Kentucky)
40231100 1
287,500287,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Louisiana Ave)
40231101 1
213,850213,850Alley Construction 40231500 3
750,000750,000Bridge - 34th Street @ Minnehaha
Creek
40231700 1
1,725,0001,725,000Storm Water- Ainsworth Park WQ
Improvements
40234000 3
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40234500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40240003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40241000 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 30
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
172,500172,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40241050 1
287,500287,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
TH169 to Texas)
40241100 1
147,700147,700Alley Construction 40241500 3
402,500402,500Storm Water- Louisiana Oaks &
South Oak Pond Rehab
40244000 1
86,25086,250Storm Water- Park Glen
Improvements
40244001 1
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40244500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40250003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40251000 1
172,500172,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40251050 1
144,550144,550Alley Construction 40251500 3
1,725,0001,725,000Storm Water- Aquila Park WQ
Improvements
40254000 3
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40254500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40260003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40261000 1
312,500312,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard
area)
40261100 1
182,000182,000Alley Construction 40261500 3
287,500287,500Storm Water- Otten Pond Rehab 40264000 1
86,25086,250Storm Water- Shelard Sediment
Basin Rehab
40264001 1
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40264500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40270003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40271000 1
287,500287,500Street - MSA Street Rehab (W28th
St)
40271100 1
1,725,0001,725,000Storm Water- Louisiana Station Area
Improvements
40274002 3
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40274500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement- SW-C&G-40280003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40281000 1
287,500287,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge)
40281100 1
575,000575,000Bridge - Meadowbrook @
Minnehaha Creek
40281700 1
172,500172,500Storm Water- Hampshire Pond
Rehab
40284000 1
230,000230,000Storm Water- Lamplighter Pond
Rehab
40284001 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 31
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40284500 3
110,000110,000Concrete Replacement - SW-C&G-
CB
40290003 1
575,000575,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40291000 1
1,725,0001,725,000Storm Water- Lake Street Basin WQ
Improvements
40294000 3
50,00050,000Storm Water- Rainwater Rewards 40294500 3
400,000400,000Upgrade SCADA Control System
(2018-2020)
53185006 3
100,00050,000 50,000GIS Survey of Utility Lines (2020-21)53205002 3
25,00025,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53205153 3
50,00050,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2020)53205301 3
25,00025,000Storm Sewer LS Maint (LS #1)53205302 3
26,00026,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53215153 3
52,00052,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2021)53215301 3
27,00027,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53225153 3
54,00054,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2022)53225301 3
28,00028,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53235153 3
56,00056,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2023)53235301 3
29,00029,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53245153 3
58,00058,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2024)53245301 3
30,00030,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53255153 3
60,00060,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2025)53255301 3
31,00031,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53265153 3
62,00062,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2026)53265301 3
32,00032,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53275153 3
64,00064,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2027)53275301 3
33,00033,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53285153 3
66,00066,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2028)53285301 3
34,00034,000Annual Lift Station Pump Repairs 53295153 3
68,00068,000Annual Catch Basin Repairs (2029)53295301 3
Stormwater Utility Total 26,058,6493,243,549 3,006,550 1,719,450 4,082,850 1,928,450 2,867,050 1,696,250 2,843,500 2,149,000 2,522,000
Tax Increment - Elmwood
2,464,0002,464,000Street- W 36th Street Reconstruction 40226000 1
1,825,0001,825,000Street- Wooddale Ave
Reconstruction
40226001 1
Tax Increment - Elmwood Total 4,289,0004,289,000
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 32
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
U.S. Government
2,918,4002,918,400CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40192000 3
560,000560,000CTP Bikeway - Sidewalk - Trail 40222000 3
U.S. Government Total 3,478,4002,918,400 560,000
Unfunded
312,487312,487Parking Lot - Gorham 40171600 5
397,058397,058Parking Lot - Lake and Wooddale
(NW corner)
40201600 3
71,02671,026Parking Lot - 27th St & Louisiana 40221600 3
129,953129,953Parking Lot - Alabama & Excelsior
Blvd
40231600 5
240,000240,000Bus Shelter Replacement, SSD1
(2021)
50214201 1
250,000250,000Bus Shelter Replacement, SSD2
(2023)
50234201 1
260,000260,000Bus Shelter Replacement, SSD3
(2025)
50254201 1
370,000370,000Street Light Replacement, E&G Area
(2026)
50264110 1
270,000270,000Bus Shelter Replacement, SSD4
(2027)
50274201 1
1,000,0001,000,000Water Project - WTP #6 Treatment
Upgrade
53245003 5
Unfunded Total 3,300,524552,487 250,000 1,000,000 927,058 441,026 129,953
Water Utility
51,00051,000Admin Serv: Utility Billing App
Replacement
13195001 1
160,00016,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000 16,000OR: Asset Mgmt Software 13995011 3
10,0005,000 5,000OR: MSC Cameras 13995031 3
312,500312,500Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40181050 1
321,600321,600Bridge - Louisiana Ave @
Minnehaha Creek
40181700 1
1,372,2561,372,256Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40201000 1
62,50025,000 37,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Monterey)
40201101 1
1,936,2551,936,255Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 8)40211000 1
1,540,0001,540,000Water- Recoat Elevated Water
Tower #2
40215000 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 33
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40221000 1
182,850182,850Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40221050 1
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 1)40231000 1
129,375129,375Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
Texas to Kentucky)
40231100 1
149,500149,500Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Louisiana Ave)
40231101 1
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 2)40241000 1
102,350102,350Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40241050 1
148,609148,609Street - MSA Street Rehab (CLR
TH169 to Texas)
40241100 1
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 3)40251000 1
85,10085,100Street - Commercial Street Rehab 40251050 1
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 4)40261000 1
231,719231,719Street - MSA Street Rehab (Shelard
area)
40261100 1
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 5)40271000 1
76,04476,044Street - MSA Street Rehab (W28th
St)
40271100 1
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 6)40281000 1
184,575184,575Street - MSA Street Rehab
(Oxford/Edgwd/Cambridge)
40281100 1
103,500103,500Bridge - Meadowbrook @
Minnehaha Creek
40281700 1
2,415,0002,415,000Street - Local Street Rehab (Area 7)40291000 1
400,000400,000Upgrade SCADA Control System
(2018-2020)
53185006 3
150,000150,000Replace Roof, WTP1 53205001 1
100,00050,000 50,000GIS Survey of Utility Lines (2020-21)53205002 3
76,00076,000Water Treatment Plant GAC
Replacement (WTP1)
53215002 1
80,00080,000Water Well Rehab (SLP11)53215003 3
45,00045,000Water Well Rehab (SLP15)53225001 3
45,00045,000Water Well Rehab (SLP10)53235001 3
50,00050,000Water Well Rehab (SLP8)53235002 3
80,00080,000Water Treatment Plant GAC
Replacement (WTP1)
53235003 1
55,00055,000Water Well Rehab (SLP16)53245001 3
520,000520,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab, WTP1 53245002 1
85,00085,000Water Well Rehab (SLP12)53255001 3
84,00084,000Water Treatment Plant GAC
Replacement (WTP1)
53255003 1
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 34
Total20202021202220232024Source20252026202720282029 #Priority
460,000460,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab, WTP6 53255004 1
55,00055,000Water Well Rehab (SLP4)53265002 3
550,000550,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab, WTP8 53265004 1
88,00088,000Water Treatment Plant GAC
Replacement (WTP1)
53275002 1
500,000500,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab,
WTP10
53275003 1
515,000515,000Water Treatment Plant Rehab,
WTP16
53285002 1
85,00085,000Water Well Rehab (SLP13)53295001 3
60,00060,000Water Well Rehab (SLP14)53295002 3
170,000170,000Replace Roof, WTP4 53295003 1
Water Utility Total 30,732,7332,647,356 3,786,755 2,613,850 2,834,875 3,311,959 3,190,100 3,267,719 3,095,044 3,234,075 2,751,000
40,816,814 25,070,616 25,679,829 31,947,445 26,613,025 265,209,138GRAND TOTAL 23,498,415 27,387,967 22,510,099 24,229,988 17,454,940
Report criteria:
Active Projects
All Address data
All Categories
All Departments
All Contacts
All From Street data
All Priority Levels
All Projects
All Source Types
All Street Name data
Monday, December 9, 20192020-2029 Draft Capital Improvement Plan
City council meeting of Dec. 16, 2019 (Item No. 8a)
Title: 2020 budget, final city and HRA property tax levies, and 2020-2029 capital improvement plan (CIP)Page 35
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Action agenda item: 8b
Executive summary
Title: Resolution accepting annual city manager evaluation
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution for formal acceptance of the final city
manager annual evaluation.
Policy consideration: Does council wish to formally accept the annual city manager evaluation?
Summary: On Monday, December 2, 2019, the council met in a closed executive session to
discuss the 2019 annual city manager evaluation. Consultant Gordon F. Goodwin facilitated the
evaluation discussion.
The mayor will provide a summary of the evaluation results, which includes an overall above
average performance rating for City Manager Tom Harmening.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Resolution
Prepared by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8b) Page 2
Title: Resolution accepting annual city manager evaluation
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution accepting the annual city manager evaluation
Whereas, the city council provides an opportunity to hold an annual evaluation of the
city manager; and
Whereas, on December 2, 2019, a closed executive session of the council was held to
discuss the 2019 evaluation,
Whereas, council has agreed that City Manager Tom Harmening’s 2019 performance
was above average;
Now therefore be it resolved, that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park hereby
accepts the annual evaluation of the city manager.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council December 2, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Consent agenda item: 8c
Executive summary
Title: 2020 non-union employee compensation
Recommended action: Motion to adopt Resolution confirming a 3% general increase for non-
union employees effective 1/1/20, approving the city manager’s salary for 2020, and continuing
participation in the Volunteer Firefighter Benefit Program.
Policy consideration: Does city council wish to confirm the recommended 2020 employee
compensation as outlined in this report?
Summary: This report details staff’s recommendation for setting non-union employee
compensation for 2020.
Recommendation for 2020 non-union employee compensation:
• Approve 3% standard adjustment to compensation plan for non-union employees, allowing
for regular progression through pay ranges.
• Adjust pay range for city manager and allow movement through the range consistent with
non-union. Set formula in compliance with salary cap.
• Approve continuation in the Volunteer Firefighter Benefit Program.
Financial or budget considerations: The amount recommended has been included in the 2020
budget.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Resolution
Prepared by: Ali Timpone, HR manager
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, deputy city manager/HR director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8c) Page 2
Title: 2020 non-union employee compensation
Discussion
Background:
Non-union employee compensation – 3% general increase effective 1/1/20
Our compensation plan, which was adopted in 1997 and revised in 2017, allows the city
manager to approve the standard adjustment based on information such as market value data,
the CPI, and the general financial condition of the city. Our positions are reviewed on a regular
basis and compared to the market, which includes metro area cities (suburbs) with populations
over 25,000 but less than 90,000, as required by our compensation plan approved by city
council. As a reminder, our non-union compensation plan was updated in 2017 to reflect target
pay at the 85th percentile of the market based on above average employee performance. Saado
Abboud, principal consultant with Keystone Compensation Group, has reviewed our pay plan
and made a recommendation for 2020 pay increases. Mr. Abboud has recommended that pay
maximums for St. Louis Park would remain competitive in 2020 if increased by 3%.
Employee performance and pay
The increase for non-union employees will be applied in accordance with our compensation
plan. In our plan, a non-probationary employee (probation is typically six months) with above
average performance receives up to double the standard increase to progress through the pay
range until they reach the pay line (maximum). Positions at the maximum, employees on
probation, and employees who do not have above average performance will receive the
standard adjustment of 3%. Employees with unsatisfactory performance do not receive an
annual increase in pay. Directors are responsible for making recommendations to the city
manager on employee performance. The city manager makes final determination on employee
pay increases based on performance.
City manager salary
The contract for the city manager states that base salary and benefits must be set when salaries
are established for other non-union employees. Compensation must comply with the state
mandated salary cap. Below is the current approved city manager compensation:
• 2019 salary range for the city manager is $178,015 - $222,519.
• Salary cap in 2019 was $175,621; SLP has a waiver and can pay up to $181,244 in 2019.
• 2019 annual salary for city manager is $181,244 annually and additional PTO of 471.23
hours (at $87.137 hourly = $41,062) for a total of $222,306, not including car allowance.
How does the state salary cap work?
State law limits the amount of compensation political subdivisions may pay employees. Under
current law, the maximum pay is 110% of the governor’s salary. Adjustments are made annually
based on the Consumer Price Index. Effective January 1, 2020, the salary cap limit is $178,782.
The City of St. Louis Park requested and received a waiver from the salary cap in 2002, allowing
us to pay in excess of the cap up to a new limit. The 2020 City of St. Louis Park cap with waiver
is $184,506.
Items that are excluded from compensation and not subject to the cap are employee benefits
that are also provided to all other full-time employees, vacation/sick leave allowances, health/
dental/disability/life insurance, pension benefits, dues paid to civic or professional organizations,
reimbursement for expenses, and relocation expenses during initial year of employment.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8c) Page 3
Title: 2020 non-union employee compensation
How is the city manager’s pay range set?
In 2017, Keystone Compensation Group and Principal Consultant Saado Abboud revised a
regional peer group to survey the base salary for the city manager position and use that
information to establish a market value salary range. All cities are outside of Minnesota since
Minnesota salaries are capped by state statute. The peer group of comparable cities based on
population size and economic group contains 27 cities in seven Midwestern states.
Consistent with the compensation strategy approved by city council in the compensation plan
to set maximum target pay at the 85th percentile of the market, our consultant has provided a
recommended 2020 salary range for the city manager of $183,520 - $229,400. This maximum is
3.1% over the 2019 maximum.
What is the recommended city manager 2020 pay?
It is recommended that the pay range for the position of city manager be set as recommended
by the consultant. Because the city manager’s compensation is not at the maximum of the 2020
range, the city manager is eligible for up to double the standard increase to the range maximum
in accordance with the compensation plan, consistent with other non-union employees. A 3.2%
increase to 2019 total compensation of $222,306 would put total compensation at the maximum
of the 2020 pay range of $229,400. Below is the recommended 2020 city manager
compensation:
• 2020 salary range set for the city manager at $183,520 - $229,400 (3.1% increase per
consultant recommendation).
• Salary cap for 2020 with SLP waiver is $184,506.
• It is recommended that effective January 1, 2020, city council approves an annual salary of
$184,506 annually ($88.028/hour for 2,096 work hours in 2020) for the city manager, not
including car allowance, in accordance with the salary cap. Car allowance of $600 per
month will be subject to the PTO program. In addition, city council approves 510 hours of
PTO for the city manager in 2020 (510 x $88.028 = $44,894).
Paid Time Off (PTO Program)
The Paid Time Off (PTO) Program is approved by city council and part of the city’s personnel
manual. Section 9.13 Paid Time Off (PTO) Program states: Effective 01/01/02, exempt employees,
including the city manager, who reach the salary limit requirements of M.S. 43A.17, Sub. 9, shall
receive equivalent hours above the limit in paid leave (PTO). Amount of paid leave (PTO) is
determined by the city council. Paid leave (PTO) is typically accrued on a per pay period basis,
although the city council may issue paid leave (PTO) as a lump sum amount of time. Paid leave
(PTO) may be used as earned, maintained in a paid leave (PTO) bank or cashed out upon
separation of employment. Paid leave (PTO) is separate and not part of the flex leave program
(Resolution 02-127). Each July 31, all hours in the PTO balance must transfer to a health care
savings plan account established for the employee in accordance with plan requirements
(Resolution 05-104). Funds in the health care savings plan can only be used for reimbursement of
eligible medical expenses after separation of employment.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8c) Page 4
Title: 2020 non-union employee compensation
Volunteer firefighter benefit program
Our part time firefighters receive a life insurance benefit through the Volunteer Firefighters’
Benefit Association of Minnesota. Our personnel policy requires city council approval for
conditions of employment relating to performance bonuses or insurance.
This program is very affordable and covers our part time firefighters. It covers life insurance up
to $20,000 and also provides some disability coverage. This program is a typical benefit offered
to other part time firefighters in municipalities in the metro area. Since part time firefighters
are not eligible for the benefits of other employees, it is important that we provide some type
of life insurance coverage for this group. We recommend city council approves continued
participation in this program consistent with Resolution 05-150.
General comment: Copies of the compensation plan are available from the city clerk.
City council meeting of December 16, 2019 (Item No. 8c) Page 5
Title: 2020 non-union employee compensation
Resolution No. 19-____
Resolution confirming 2020 compensation for non-union employees;
setting the city manager’s salary; and
continuing participation in the volunteer firefighter benefit program
Whereas the city council established and approved, by Resolution 17-012, the Position
Classification and Compensation Plan for the City of St. Louis Park, and Section VIII-C of such
plan directs the city manager to approve the standard adjustment to the plan; and
Whereas the city council wishes to adopt policies for city employees and has conferred
upon the city manager the power to establish and administer additional administrative policies
and rules as may be appropriate for the employment practices of the city; and
Now therefore be it resolved that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
A. Confirms the city manager’s decision to implement a standard adjustment of 3%,
effective January 1, 2020 for non-union employees in accordance with the Position
Classification and Compensation Plan; and
B. Confirms a salary of $184,506 for the city manager (based on 2,096-hour year), not
including car allowance. Salary application must comply with the salary limitations set
by state statute, therefore PTO applies to the city manager’s car allowance of $600 per
month. City council also approves an additional 510 hours of PTO for the city manager in
2020; and
D. Approves continuation of participation in the Volunteer Firefighters’ Benefit Association
of MN Benefit Program for 2020, consistent with Resolution 05-150.
Reviewed for administration: Adopted by the City Council December 16, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, city manager Jake Spano, mayor
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, city clerk
Meeting: City council
Meeting date: December 16, 2019
Action agenda item: 8d
Executive summary
Title: Recognition of Councilmembers Steve Hallfin and Thom Miller
Recommended action:
• On behalf of the city council and city manager, the mayor is asked to recognize Steve Hallfin
for his years of service as Councilmember At Large A of the St. Louis Park City Council from
Jan. 3, 2012 to Jan. 6, 2020.
• On behalf of the city council and city manager, the mayor is asked to recognize Thom Miller
for his years of service as Councilmember At Large B of the St. Louis Park City Council from
Jan. 4, 2016 to Jan. 6, 2020.
Policy consideration: Not applicable.
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: None
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, administrative services office assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, city manager