HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019/07/22 - ADMIN - Agenda Packets - City Council - Study SessionAGENDA
JULY 22, 2019
5:30 p.m. CLOSED EXECUTIVE SESSION – Community room
Discussion items
1. 5:30 p.m. Discuss potential litigation and legal strategy regarding the T.H. 100/C.R. 3
solvent plume* (Verbal)
* This meeting is closed as permitted by the attorney-client privilege (section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b)).
6:20 p.m. SPECIAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Community room
1.Call to order
2.Roll call
3.Approval of minutes
3a. EDA meeting minutes June 17, 2019
4.Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar
EDA consent calendar
4a. Accept for filing city disbursement claims for the period of May 24 through July 5, 2019.
4b. Adopt EDA Resolution approving the purchase agreement between the EDA and
Thomas C. Evans and Constance G. Evans for 5643 Minnetonka Boulevard and
authorize the President and Executive Director to execute the documents necessary to
complete the real estate transaction.
4c. Adopt EDA Resolution finding the building at 3200 Lynn Ave S structurally substandard
to a degree requiring removal.
6:30 p.m. STUDY SESSION – Community room
Discussion items
1. 6:30 p.m. Future study session agenda planning
2. 6:35 p.m. Reilly Site Amended Consent Decree Update
3. 6:55 p.m. 2020 budget – public safety overview
8:25 p.m. Communications/updates (verbal)
8:30 p.m. Adjourn
Written reports
4. June 2019 monthly financial report
5. Second quarter investment report (April – June 2019)
6. Housing Authority (HA) Board 2019 annual work plan
7. Food security and access study update
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. To make arrangements, please call
the administration department at 952/924-2525 (TDD 952/924-2518) at least 96 hours in advance of meeting.
Meeting: Special economic development authority
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Minutes: 3a
Unofficial minutes
Economic development authority
St. Louis Park, Minnesota
June 17, 2019
1.Call to order
President Hallfin called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m.
Commissioners present: President Steve Hallfin, Tim Brausen, Rachel Harris, Anne Mavity, and
Margaret Rog.
Commissioners absent: Thom Miller and Jake Spano
Staff present: Executive Director (Mr. Harmening), Economic Development Coordinator (Mr.
Hunt), Community Development Director (Ms. Barton), City Attorney (Mr. Mattick), Deputy City
Manager/Human Resources Director (Ms. Deno), CFO (Mr. Simon), Senior Management Analyst
(Ms. Carrillo Perez), and Recording Secretary (Ms. Pappas).
2.Roll call
3.Approval of minutes
3a. EDA minutes of May 6, 2019
It was moved by Commissioner Brausen, seconded by Commissioner Mavity, to approve
the May 6, 2019 meeting minutes as presented.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Miller and Spano absent).
4.Approval of agenda and items on EDA consent calendar
4a. Accept for filing city disbursement for period of April 27-June 7, 2019.
4b. Adopt EDA Resolution No. 19-05 approving the First Amendment to the
Preliminary Development Agreement between the EDA, city, and Sherman
Associates relative to the Beltline Blvd Station Redevelopment Site.
4c. Approve amending the bylaws of the St. Louis Park Economic Development
Authority relating to meeting start times.
It was moved by Commissioner Mavity, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to approve
the EDA agenda as presented and the items on the consent calendar.
The motion passed 5-0 (Commissioners Miller and Spano absent).
5.Reports - None
6.Old Business - None
Page 2 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 3a)
Title: Economic development authority meeting minutes of June 17, 2019
7.New Business
7a. Fifth Amendment to Purchase and Redevelopment Contract with PLACE E-
Generation One, LLC. EDA Resolution No. 19-06.
Mr. Hunt presented the staff report. He noted the staff report and requirements of a
Fifth Amendment in order to extend the project completion dates.
Commissioner Brausen stated the developer has had financial challenges, which have
continued to be addressed by the developer. He stated substantial progress has been
made on the construction, adding he would like to give the project the opportunity to
succeed and, therefore, this is the reason for the deadline extension.
President Hallfin stated he will be opposed to the Fifth Amendment, adding the city
might be missing opportunities for other developers and at this point, he will say no.
It was moved by Commissioner Mavity, seconded by Commissioner Brausen, to waive the
reading and adopt EDA Resolution No. 19-06, approving Firth Amendment to Purchase
and Redevelopment Contract – PLACE E-Generation One, LLC.
The motion passed 4-1 (President Hallfin opposed, Commissioners Miller and Spano
absent).
8. Communications
9. Adjournment
The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m.
______________________________________ ______________________________________
Melissa Kennedy, Secretary Steve Hallfin, President
Meeting: Special economic development authority
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4a
Executive summary
Title: Approval of EDA disbursements
Recommended action: Motion to accept for filing EDA disbursement claims for the period of
May 24, through July 5, 2019.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA desire to approve EDA disbursements in accordance with
Article V – Administration of Finances, of the EDA bylaws?
Summary: The finance division prepares this report on a monthly basis for the EDA to review and
approve. The attached reports show both EDA disbursements paid by physical check and those
by wire transfer or Automated Clearing House (ACH) when applicable.
Financial or budget considerations: Review and approval of the information follows the EDA’s
charter and provides another layer of oversight to further ensure fiscal stewardship.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: EDA disbursements
Prepared by: Darla Monson, Senior Accountant
Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer
Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
7/10/2019CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:19:08R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
6/7/20195/24/2019 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
1,418,598.00METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,418,598.00
14,764.99MORRIES DEALERSHIP GRANTS SOIL REMEDIATION
14,764.99
7,385.90PARKWAY 25 LLC GRANTS SOIL REMEDIATION
7,385.90
278,410.31PLACEGRANTSGROUND WATER CLEAN UP
278,410.31
Report Totals 1,719,159.20
Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 2
7/10/2019CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:16:49R55CKS2LOGIS400V
1Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
7/5/20196/8/2019 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
3,307.05ASAKURA ROBINSON COMPANY INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING
3,307.05
4,683.68DERODEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,683.68
154.00EHLERS & ASSOCIATES INC ELIOT PARK TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
153.00WEST END TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
153.00ELLIPSE ON EXC TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
153.00CSM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
153.00MILL CITY G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
153.00WOLFE LAKE COMMERCIAL TIF G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
153.00SHOREHAM TIF DIST G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
153.00AQUILA COMMONS G & A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,225.00
580.50GREEN HORIZONS 7015 WALKER-RYNLDS WELDING LAND MAINTENANCE
219.00BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LAND MAINTENANCE
90.00WOODDALE STATION TIF DIST LAND MAINTENANCE
84.00MTKA BLVD PROPERTIES LAND MAINTENANCE
535.50HWY 7 & LOUISIANA LAND MAINTENANCE
1,509.00
6,534.90HOISINGTON KOEGLER GROUP INC DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A PLANNING
6,534.90
5.00HUNT, GREG DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MEETING EXPENSE
191.40DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A MILEAGE-PERSONAL CAR
196.40
3,850.99KENNEDY & GRAVEN BELTLINE SWLRT DEVELOPMENT LEGAL SERVICES
724.50WEST END TIF DIST G&A LEGAL SERVICES
1,475.00DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES
6,050.49
3,000.00LOCKRIDGE GRINDAL NAUEN PLLP DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A LEGAL SERVICES
3,000.00
666,666.67METRO TRANSIT COMMISSION DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
666,666.67
Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 3
7/10/2019CITY OF ST LOUIS PARK 10:16:49R55CKS2 LOGIS400V
2Page -Council Check SummaryNote: Payment amount may not reflect the actual amount due to data sequencing and/or data selection.
7/5/20196/8/2019 -
Amount
ObjectVendorBU Description
218.38SLP NEST DEVELOPMENT - EDA G&A OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
218.38
105,636.28ST LOUIS PARK CONV & VISITORS BUREAU CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU COST REIMBURSEMENT-CVB
105,636.28
Report Totals 799,027.85
Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4a)
Title: Approval of EDA disbursements Page 4
Meeting: Special economic development authority
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4b
Executive summary
Title: Purchase agreement for 5643 Minnetonka Boulevard
Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution approving the purchase agreement
between the EDA and Thomas C. Evans and Constance G. Evans for 5643 Minnetonka Boulevard
and authorize the President and Executive Director to execute the documents necessary to
complete the real estate transaction.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA approve the proposed purchase of 5643 Minnetonka
Boulevard?
Summary: At the April 8, 2019 study session, the EDA expressed consensus support for
acquiring the single family property at 5643 Minnetonka Boulevard. Staff has negotiated a
purchase agreement to purchase the property for $230,000. The proposed agreement has been
reviewed and approved by the EDA’s legal counsel. Closing will occur by August 30, 2019.
Upon acquisition, staff will pursue either a full deconstruction and demolition of the house,
allowing for a majority of the materials to be reused, or moving the house to a location outside
of St. Louis Park for reuse in its entirety. EDA ownership of the property would allow the city to
continue efforts to facilitate and guide redevelopment of these properties and expand the city’s
stock of affordable housing.
Financial or budget considerations: The $230,000 cost to acquire and remove the subject
property is allocated within the 2019 Development Fund budget. The EDA could incur
additional costs related to property management before the property is redeveloped. The cost
of acquisition and related expenses would be paid for by the Development Fund with the intent
to recoup the EDA’s investment from the future sale of the property.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Discussion
EDA Resolution
Prepared by: Julie Grove, Economic Development Specialist
Reviewed by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Nancy Deno, EDA Deputy Executive Director and Deputy City Manager
Page 2 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Purchase agreement for 5643 Minnetonka Boulevard
Discussion
5643 Minnetonka Boulevard
Background: In May 2018 the EDA purchased a foreclosed, single-family property at 5639
Minnetonka Boulevard for the purpose of facilitating redevelopment of the property and
potentially the three adjacent properties to the west. The properties are zoned R-4 medium-
density multi-family residential. The intent of the acquisition is to facilitate land assemblage
that could ultimately be redeveloped with medium density housing and include affordable
housing such as row homes or townhomes. Consistent with this goal and per EDA directive,
staff continues to pursue the remaining properties as they become available.
This past winter, staff was approached by owners of the neighboring property located at 5643
Minnetonka Blvd inquiring if the EDA was interested in purchasing their property. Staff
subsequently negotiated a purchase price of $230,000 for the property. The City Assessor
examined this value and concurred that the proposed purchase price is within market. Due to
the owners health issues staff has agreed to provide flexibility on the possession date and allow
the owners to remain on the property after closing for up to 90 days. An Occupancy Agreement
has been attached to the purchase agreement stipulating terms of this arrangement.
Page 3 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Purchase agreement for 5643 Minnetonka Boulevard
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority
Resolution No.19-____
Resolution approving the purchase agreement between
the St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority
and Thomas C. Evans and Constance G. Evans
Be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners of the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority (the "Authority") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. The Authority has determined a need to exercise the powers of a housing and
redevelopment authority, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections. 469.090 to 469.108 ("EDA
Act"), and is currently administering Redevelopment Project No. 1 ("Redevelopment Project")
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.001 to 469.047 ("HRA Act").
1.02. Among the activities to be assisted by the Authority in the Redevelopment
Project is acquisition of a single family property to pursue affordable housing goals in the City
located at 5639 Minnetonka Boulevard and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto
(“Property”).
1.03. There has been presented before the Board a Purchase Agreement
(“Agreement”) setting forth the terms and conditions of the purchase of the Property between
the Authority and the Seller of the Property, Thomas C. Evans and Constance G. Evans
(“Seller”). The Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
1.04. The Board has reviewed the Agreement and finds that the execution thereof and
performance of the Authority's obligations thereunder are in the best interest of the City and its
residents.
Section 2. Authority Approval; Further Proceedings.
2.01. The Agreement as presented to the Board is hereby in all respects approved,
subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are
approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the documents
by such officials shall be conclusive evidence of approval.
2.02. The President and Executive Director are hereby authorized to execute on behalf
of the Authority the Agreement and any documents referenced therein requiring execution by
the Authority, and to carry out, on behalf of the Authority its obligations thereunder.
Page 4 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4b)
Title: Purchase agreement for 5643 Minnetonka Boulevard
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic
Development Authority July 22, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, Executive Director Steve Hallfin, President
Attest
Melissa Kennedy, Secretary
Meeting: Special economic development authority
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Consent agenda item: 4c
Executive summary
Title: Structurally substandard building designation – 3200 Lynn Ave. South
Recommended action: Motion to adopt EDA Resolution finding the building at 3200 Lynn Ave S
structurally substandard to a degree requiring removal.
Policy consideration: Does the EDA find that the vacant industrial building located at 3200 Lynn
Ave S is structurally substandard to a degree requiring removal?
Summary: The industrial building located at 3200 Lynn Avenue South (“subject property”) was
acquired by the Metropolitan Council in 2018 in order to construct the proposed Lynn Ave
Extension and backage Road, which will provide access to the future Southwest Light Rail
Transit (SWLRT) Beltline Blvd Station Park & Ride. The Metropolitan Council plans to demolish
and remove the building later this year. In anticipation of a future redevelopment Tax
Increment Financing (TIF) district in this area, LHB was retained to inspect the building. LHB
concluded in its June 27, 2019 TIF Analysis Findings Letter to staff that the building on the 3200
Lynn Avenue South property “qualifies as structurally substandard”.
In order to preserve the EDA’s ability to include the 3200 Lynn Avenue South property in a
future TIF district to facilitate the larger Beltline Blvd Station redevelopment, the EDA must
adopt a resolution establishing: (1) the subject property is occupied by a structurally substandard
building prior to its demolition and (2) that the EDA may create a future TIF district
encompassing the subject property. This action will protect the EDA’s ability to include the
subject property in a future redevelopment TIF district for up to three years following
demolition of the building.
Financial or budget considerations: The Metropolitan Council will demolish and remove the
3200 Lynn Avenue South building per the previously approved Master and Subordinate Funding
Agreements with the city.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Discussion
EDA Resolution
Prepared by: Greg Hunt, Economic Development Coordinator
Reviewed by: Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Nancy Deno, EDA Deputy Executive Director/Deputy City Manager
Page 2 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4c)
Title: Structurally substandard building designation – 3200 Lynn Ave. South
Discussion
Location of subject property within future proposed redevelopment TIF district
Page 3 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4c)
Title: Structurally substandard building designation – 3200 Lynn Ave. South
St. Louis Park Economic Development Authority
EDA Resolution No. 19 - ____
Resolution designating a building within
Redevelopment Project No. 1 as structurally substandard
Be it resolved by the Board of Commissioners ("Board") of the St. Louis Park Economic
Development Authority ("Authority") as follows:
Section 1. Recitals.
1.01. Under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10(d), the Authority is
authorized to deem parcels as occupied by structurally substandard buildings despite prior
demolition or removal of the buildings, subject to certain terms and conditions as described in this
resolution.
1.02. The Authority intends to cause demolition of the building located on the property
described in Exhibit A hereto (the “Designated Property”), and may in the future include the
Designated Property in a redevelopment or renewal and renovation tax increment financing
district as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.174, Subd. 10.
Section 2. Building Designated Substandard; Other Proceedings.
2.01. The Authority finds that the building on the Designated Property as described in
Exhibit A is structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance,
based upon the analysis of such building by LHB summarized in the TIF ANALYSIS FINDINGS FOR
3200 LYNN, ST. LOUIS PARK, MN, dated June 27, 2019 and on file in City Hall.
2.02. After the date of approval of this resolution, the building on the Designated
Property may be demolished or removed by the Authority, or such demolition or removal may be
financed by the Authority, or may be undertaken by a developer under a development agreement
with the Authority.
2.03. The Authority intends to include the Designated Property in a redevelopment or
renewal and renovation tax increment financing district, and to file the request for certification of
such district with the Hennepin County auditor within three years after the date of building
demolition on the Designated Property.
2.04. Upon filing the request for certification of the new tax increment financing district,
the Authority will notify the Hennepin County auditor that the original tax capacity of the
Designated Property must be adjusted to reflect the greater of (a) the current net tax capacity of
the parcel, or (b) the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the building was
demolished or removed, but applying class rates for the current year, all in accordance with
Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, subd. 10(d).
Page 4 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4c)
Title: Structurally substandard building designation – 3200 Lynn Ave. South
2.05. Authority staff and consultants are authorized to take any actions necessary to
carry out the intent of this resolution.
Reviewed for Administration: Adopted by the Economic Development
Authority July 22, 2019
Thomas K. Harmening, Executive Director Steve Hallfin, President
Attest:
Melissa Kennedy, Secretary
Page 5 Special economic development authority meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4c)
Title: Structurally substandard building designation – 3200 Lynn Ave. South
Exhibit A
Description of Designated Property
Property address: 3200 Lynn Street, St. Louis Park, MN
PID: 602824120105
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Discussion item: 1
Executive summary
Title: Future study session agenda planning
Recommended action: The city council and city manager to set the agenda for the regularly
scheduled study session on August 12, 2019.
Policy consideration: Not applicable.
Summary: This report summarizes the proposed agenda for the regularly scheduled study
session on August 12, 2019. Also attached to this report is:
- Study session discussion topics and timeline
-Proposed topics for future study session discussion:
o Revisiting our housing setback, FRA, and more to maintain and create more
affordable housing- proposed by Councilmembers Miller and Rog
Financial or budget considerations: Not applicable.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Tentative agenda – August 12, 2019
Study session discussion topics and timeline
Study session topics proposed for future study session discussion
Prepared by: Debbie Fischer, Administrative Services Office Assistant
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 1) Page 2
Title: Future study session agenda planning
August 12, 2019.
6:30 p.m. Study session – Community room
Tentative discussion items
1.Future study session agenda planning – Administrative services (5 minutes)
2.Fats, oils, grease and backflow ordinance discussion – Building & Energy/Operations &
Recreation Departments (30 minutes)
Staff will provide information related the proposed ordinance to deal with fats, oils, grease
and backflow prevention.
3.2020 budget – Administrative Services (90 minutes)
Staff will be reviewing the 2020 budget and providing information on where things stand
from a levy perspective.
Communications/meeting check-in – Administrative services (5 minutes)
Time for communications between staff and council will be set aside on every study session
agenda for the purposes of information sharing.
End of meeting: 8:40 p.m.
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 1) Page 3
Title: Future study session agenda planning
Study session discussion topics and timeline
Discussion topic Comments Date Scheduled
C-1 zoning district retail and
service use restrictions
Discussed on 6/11/18; referred to PC. Discussed
11/26/18; SS report 2/25/19; Discussed 3/11/19 –
further discussion requested by council; SS discussion
7/8/19; PC public hearing late Aug.
Sept. 2019
Accessory dwelling units/home-
based businesses
SS discussion 6/10/2019. Referred to planning
commission. Staff to prepare ADU ordinance for pc
discussion Qtr. 3 2019. Home occupation based
businesses pc discussion Qtr. 4 2019 or Qtr. 1 2020
Qtr. 4 2019 and
Qtr. 2 2020
Revitalization of Walker Lake
area
Part of preserving Walker building reports: 8/28/17,
9/25/17, 1/22/18, design study 2/12/18, update
4/23/18, design study update 8/27/18; SS report
2/11/19; SS discussion 5/28/19, planning commission
to review ordinances for implementation Qtr. 3 and
Qtr. 4 2019
Qtr. 4 2019
Election holiday discussion 3rd Qtr.
Crime free
ordinance/affordable housing
strategies
Discussed 5/14/18. 1st reading housing trust fund
10/1/18; Other affordable housing strategies/Crime
Free Ordinance – Nov/Dec, 12/10 and 12/17/18 and
1/14/19 council discussion; Certain provisions of
crime free ord. suspended; Work group being formed;
CFO work group discussed on 3/25/2019; Work group
had first meeting in May and two meetings in June.
Next meeting is July 24.
TBD; Pending
workgroup
recommendation
Quarterly public forums at city
council meetings TBD
Immigration & supporting
families
Discussed 8/6 and referred to HRC. HRC held comm.
mtg. in Oct. Council/HRC discussion on 12/10; referred
back to HRC for refinement of recommendations
TBD
Discuss and evaluate our public
process TBD
Easy access to nature, across
city, starting with low-income
neighborhoods
TBD
STEP discussion: facilities
Discussed on 1/14/19; Tom H, Derek R. and Astein O.
toured the Central Community Center and are
continuing discussions
TBD
Westwood Hills Nature Center
Access Fund *On hold pending discussion with school district.*On hold
SEED’s community greenhouse/
resilient cities initiative
*On hold until Food Access and Security study is
complete and recommendations have been made.*On hold
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 1) Page 4
Title: Future study session agenda planning
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Discussion item: 2
Executive summary
Title: Reilly Site Amended Consent Decree Update
Recommended action: No action at this time.
Policy consideration: Is the council in agreement on moving forward with the amended consent
decree?
Summary: The city has worked with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) and the
United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to prepare an Amended Consent
Decree and Remedial Action Plan (“CD-RAP”) for to the Reilly Tar & Chemical Superfund Site.
The amended CD-RAP is based on the current U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) model and
provides greater flexibility for the city and the regulatory agencies to tailor the remedy to
address current and future conditions at the site. Among other changes, the main points of the
amended CD-RAP include:
•Incorporates current water quality standards and provides that new
and/or revised standards will apply automatically;
•Implements the remedy (groundwater pumping and treatment)
through separate plans which can be modified to address changing site
conditions without reopening the CD-RAP;
•Removes certain parties (Vertellus Industries and Minnesota
Department of Health) and provides a limited role for others (Oak Park
Village, Philip’s Investment, and City of Hopkins); and
•Creates a mechanism to use the funds, if any, that EPA recovers in
connection with the bankruptcy of the former Site owner (Vertellus
Industries) to reimburse the City’s costs related to the Site.
At this meeting David Zoll, consultant and staff will updates for council and the process for
amending the consent decree and next steps for approval.
Next Steps: This City of St. Louis Park City Council will need to approve the amended CD-RP.
Staff suggests putting this on the Council agenda for formal approval for the August 5, 2020
meeting.
Financial or budget considerations: None at this time.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in
environmental stewardship.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Prepared by: Cynthia S. Walsh, Operations and Recreation Director
Mark Hanson, Public Works Superintendent
Approved by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Page 2 Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 2)
Title: Reilly Site Amended Consent Decree Update
Discussion
Background: The City has worked with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (“MPCA”) and
the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) to prepare an Amended Consent
Decree and Remedial Action Plan (“CD-RAP”) for to the Reilly Tar & Chemical Superfund Site.
The Amended CD-RAP is based on the current U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) model and
provides greater flexibility for the City and the regulatory agencies to tailor the remedy to
address current and future conditions at the site. The primary changes include; incorporating
current water quality standards and providing that new and/or revised standards will apply
automatically; implementing the remedy (groundwater pumping and treatment) through
separate plans which can be modified to address changing site conditions without reopening
the CD-RAP; removing certain parties (Vertellus Industries and Minnesota Department of
Health) and provide a limited role for others (Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Oak Park
Village, Philip’s Investment and City of Hopkins); and creating a mechanism to reimburse the
city’s costs if the EPA recovers funds from the former site owner (Vertellus Industries).
Present considerations: The parties to the existing CD-RAP will also need to sign this amended
document. Philip’s Investment (Park Tavern) has already signed the amended Consent Decree
The City of Hopkins approved the amended Consent Decree at its June 18, 2019 City Council
meeting and is expected to sign the document soon. Since Oak Park Village is in the process of
selling its property, we are working with the DOJ on an access agreement with the buyer in
advance of Oak Park Village signing the Amended CD-RAP prior to the mid-July closing of the
sale. The remaining parties, MPCA, EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice, are going through
formal approval and obtaining signatures. Timing of the final approval from the DOJ will depend
upon whether they will view the amended CD-RAP as an update to the existing CD-RAP (roughly
one month for approval) or as a new CD-RAP (roughly two months). The DOJ attorney assigned
to the site is recommending that it be addressed as an update because it does not add any
parties or address any new areas of contamination. Once the amended Consent Decree is
signed by all parties, the DOJ will file a Notice of Lodging Consent Decree with the US District
Court. This filing will trigger a 30-day public comment period after which the court can give final
approval of the CD-RAP.
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Discussion item: 3
Executive summary
Title: 2020 budget – public safety overview
Recommended action: No formal action required. This report is to assist with the study session
discussion regarding the preparation of the 2020 budget.
Policy consideration:
•Is the information presented sufficient with council request?
•Is there other information that council would like to review during the upcoming
process including any other service delivery change considerations?
Summary: Staff has been working on the 2020 budget including analyzing and reviewing all the
information for the budget in preparation for the August 12th council study session. On May 13,
2019 council requested an overview of the Police and Fire budgets and related operations.
At this study session Mike Harcey, Police Chief and Steve Koering, Fire Chief will be present to
provide an overview of their departments, review programs and operations and future
considerations. Time will be provided for council conversation and questions.
Financial or budget considerations: Information and discussion at this meeting will help to
further develop 2020 budget recommendations. The Police and Fire budgets represent
approximately 40% of the General Fund budget. Please note that the 2020 budget
recommendations for all departments are currently being reviewed by staff and the city
manager. More firm numbers will be presented at the August meeting by the city manager that
will include overall recommendations for 2020 budget year.
Strategic priority consideration: All areas of the adopted strategic priorities are impacted by
the city’s budget.
Supporting documents: June 17, 2019 staff report
Discussion
Police and Fire organization charts
Prepared by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer
Mike Harcey, Police Chief
Steve Koering, Fire Chief
Reviewed by: Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Page 2 Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 3)
Title: 2020 budget – public safety overview
Discussion
Police
The police department’s staffing consists of 72 full time employees and 8 part time employees;
positions are shown in the attached organizational chart. The department also connects with
and supports a police reserve unit consisting of 15 volunteers that assist as needed.
The total operating budget for 2019 is $10,335,497 in expenditures and $1,023,821 in revenues.
At the study session staff will provide an overview of all operations, programs and activities
coordinated and lead by the Police Department. This will include:
•General operations and community policing
o Day to day patrol operations staffing
o Special assignments
o Records, data and support operations
o Recruiting and training,
o Overtime
o Equipment and Fleet
•Outreach
•Dispatch
The 2020 budget recommendations for all departments are currently being reviewed by staff
and the city manager. More firm numbers will be presented at the August meeting on overall
recommendations.
The initial preliminary proposal before any additional 2020 staffing requests is $10,946,127.
This proposed budget includes $9,888,668 in wages and benefits for the current staffing level.
The remaining $1,057,459 of the budget is allocated to support day to day operations,
community policing philosophy, community outreach activities, dispatch center and the
recruiting, training and equipment that staff needs to be successful.
A few highlights of the 2020 requested budget includes recommending to the city manager the
addition of:
•one police officer
•dispatch supervisor
•public safety information specialist
Please Note: all 2020 staffing requests for this and other budgets are under review by the city
manager. A final recommendation from the city manager will be made at a later date.
Additional budgetary requests include:
•the cost of 50% of the salary for a Hennepin County Licensed Social Worker to assist
with the response to mental health issues in our community
•30% share of the cost for the existing Hennepin County JCPP Liaison
•$21,000 for Employee Wellness to provide mental health check in’s for all of PD staff
•$50,000 to hire a consultant to assist with the design and implementation of race data
collection on traffic stops
Page 3 Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 3)
Title: 2020 budget – public safety overview
Fire
The fire department is comprised of both fulltime and part time response staff. The attached
organization chart shows the reporting structure and span of control for each group.
Of the 27 full-time/career staff in the department 21 work shifts regularly (the 2 Lieutenants
who work days in the office can also work 24’s if needed) and there are three shifts that work a
rotating schedule. The part time staff which has currently 22 members, fills in as shift staff in a
scheduled duty crew model, and are available for call backs during high demand.
The fire departments 2019 annual operating budget of $4,813,078.00 is guided by the
departments Strategic Plan which was developed in 2018 and defines the 4 divisions that focus
on the departments day to day operations. Prevention and Education; Suppression and
Emergency Response; Emergency Medical Services; and Emergency Management. Expenditures
to support these priorities include $4,276,884.00 in wages and benefits with the remaining
$536,194 directed at supporting and sustaining the day to day delivery of services.
At the study session meeting staff will provide an overview of all operations, programs and
activities coordinated and lead by the Fire Department. This will include:
•Fire Operations
o Day to day shift operations and staffing
o Prevention and education efforts
o Training and Development
o Community Health Management
o Recruiting and retention
o Overtime
o Technology
•Outreach and Community Engagement
•Dispatch
The 2020 budget recommendations for all departments are currently being reviewed by staff
and the city manager. More firm numbers will be presented at the August meeting on overall
recommendations.
The initial proposal before any additional staffing requests for the 2020 budget is
$5,086,677.00. The proposed budget includes $4,523,090 in wages and benefits for our current
staffing level. The remaining $563,587 of our budget is allocated to support our day to day
operations, connection with community through education, inspection, safety and outreach
activities and the recruiting, training and equipment that staff needs to be successful.
The fire department continues to review alternative staffing solutions to deliver service at the
lowest most predictable cost. One significant challenge is the major impact that technology is
having on department operations and the need to support that technology day to day as well as
a set of eyes to evaluate business process and design. We are considering an outsource model
to address that. Second is the increased overtime and how added career staff might help
reduce the impact. The department has not submitted requests for additional staffing as we
are piloting different concepts within the boundaries of our current operational budget. Lastly
we continue to collaborate with the police department on how service deliveries impact our
dispatch center and the appropriate resources for that work.
Page 4 Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 3)
Title: 2020 budget – public safety overview
Next steps: The following preliminary timeline has been developed for council:
August 12 Review and discussion of 2020 budget. Department Directors or their
designees will also be in attendance.
September 3 (Tues) High level 2020 Budget, Draft CIP, fees, utility rates discussion. This
meeting will be more of a proposed preliminary levy discussion with
direction provided to staff to prepare information for the September 16th
meeting adopting preliminary levies.
September 16 Council establishes 2019 preliminary property tax levy and HRA levy.
(Levies can be reduced, but not increased for final property tax levies.)
October 7 Review and discussion of 2020 budget, CIP, utility rates and LRFMP.
Directors or their designees in attendance as needed.
October 21 Public Hearing - 1st Reading of Fees, and adoption of 2020 Utility Rates
November 4 (If necessary) Budget and CIP discussion prior to Truth in Taxation Public
Hearing and budget presentation. 2nd Reading of Fee on Consent.
November Live Facebook chat on 2020 budget and CIP.
December 2 Truth in Taxation Public Hearing and budget presentation
December 16 Council adopts 2019 Revised Budget, 2020 Budgets, final tax levies (City
and HRA), and 2020 - 2029 CIP.
Police – 72 people/FTE 57 max sworn2019Police Chief (1)Records Supervisor (1) Lieutenant (1)Lieutenant (1)Lieutenant (1)Office Assistant III (1)Office Assistant II (4)Deputy Chief (1)Dispatcher (1)(lead assignment)Dispatcher (7) Sergeant (1)Sergeant (6)Police Officer (29)CSO Coordinator (1)Sergeant (2)Police Officer (13)Assigned to:support services (7)school liaison/DARE (4)community outreach (1)drug task force (1)Police Officer (1)(technology assignment)Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 3) Title: 2020 budget – public safety overviewPage 5
Fire Chief Administrative Assistant
Deputy Fire Chief
Assistant Chief/
Fire Marshal
Day Lieutenant
Chief of Training
and EMS
Day Lieutenant CERT Coordinator
CEMTS
Captain B Shift Captain C Shift Captain A Shift
Station 1
Career FF’s (2)
Part time FF’s (4)
Station 2
Lieutenant (1)
Career FF’s (3)
Part time FF’s (2)
Station 1
Career FF’s (2)
Part time FF’s (3)
Station 2
Lieutenant (1)
Career FF’s (3)
Part time FF’s (4)
Station 2
Lieutenant (1)
Career FF’s (2)
Part time FF’s (3)
Station 1
Career FF’s (3)
Part time FF’s (3)
New Hire
Team Leader
New Hire
Recruits (4)
Intern (open)
FP Specialist (3)
Care Coordinator
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 3)
Title: 2020 budget – public safety overview Page 6
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Written report: 4
Executive summary
Title: June 2019 monthly financial report
Recommended action: No action required at this time.
Policy consideration: Monthly financial reports are part of our financial management policies.
Summary: The monthly financial report provides a summary of general fund revenues and
departmental expenditures and a comparison of budget to actual throughout the year. A
budget to actual summary for the four utility funds is also included in this report.
Financial or budget considerations: At the end of June, general fund expenditures were at
approximately 47.3% of the adopted annual budget, which is about 2.7% under budget.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Summary of revenues and expenditures – general fund
Budget to actual – enterprise funds
Prepared by: Darla Monson, Accountant
Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer
Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4) Page 2
Title: June 2019 monthly financial report
Discussion
Background: This monthly report provides summary information of the overall level of
revenues and departmental expenditures in the general fund compared to the adopted budget
throughout the year. A budget to actual summary for the four utility funds is also included in
this report.
Present considerations:
General Fund
Actual expenditures should generally be at about 50% of the annual budget at the end of June.
General Fund expenditures were at 47.3% through June. Revenues are harder to measure in the
same way due to the timing of when they are received, examples of which include property taxes,
grants and State aid payments.
License and permit revenues combined are at 84% of budget through June. Nearly 90% of the
2019 business and liquor license revenue has already been received, which is typical of prior
years as the majority are renewals paid early in the year. Permit revenues increased to 83% of
the annual budget through June. Larger building permits issued to date include PLACE,
Bridgewater Bank, Yeshiva School, St. Louis Park School District, Elan West End Apartments,
Urban Park Apartments, The Block restaurant and the nature center.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Actual $2,885 $5,979 $8,957 $11,824 $15,327 $18,496
Budget $3,257 $6,515 $9,772 $13,029 $16,287 $19,544 $22,801 $26,058 $29,316 $32,573 $35,830 $39,088
$0
$5,000
$10,000
$15,000
$20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$35,000
$40,000
$45,000
$ THOUSANDS Monthly Expenditures -General Fund
Summary of Revenues & Expenditures - General Fund As of June 30, 2019 20192019201720172018201820192019BalanceYTD Budget Budget Audited Budget Audited BudgetYTD June Remaining to Actual %General Fund Revenues: General Property Taxes24,748,436$ 24,837,901$ 25,705,886$ 26,597,928$ 26,880,004$ -$ 26,880,004$ 0.00% Licenses and Permits3,745,736 3,985,517 3,924,648 4,001,644 4,103,424 3,451,291 652,133 84.11% Fines & Forfeits254,200 293,236 269,200 282,146 279,700 162,259 117,441 58.01% Intergovernmental1,631,669 1,899,006 1,864,877 2,006,435 1,760,900 420,758 1,340,142 23.89% Charges for Services2,027,637 2,051,552 2,162,410 2,180,589 2,187,319 1,019,265 1,168,054 46.60% Miscellaneous Revenue1,274,415 1,294,452 1,318,037 1,427,744 1,367,012 662,454 704,558 48.46% Transfers In1,899,927 1,951,218 1,929,090 1,929,076 1,999,877 974,939 1,024,938 48.75% Investment Earnings 140,000 125,984 160,000 251,494 180,000 180,000 0.00% Other Income30,450 54,303 40,950 35,802 31,300 28,215 3,085 90.14% Use of Fund Balance *58,541 - 523,835 298,156 - 298,156 0.00%Total General Fund Revenues35,811,011$ 36,493,169$ 37,898,933$ 38,712,858$ 39,087,692$ 6,719,181$ 32,368,511$ 17.19%General Fund Expenditures: General Government: Administration 1,049,123$ 1,056,796$ 1,341,606$ 1,340,282$ 1,837,620$ 708,701$ 1,128,919$ 38.57% Finance 957,275 924,832 978,752 964,036 1,034,199 506,270 527,930 48.95% Assessing707,139 652,015 759,865 710,715 772,746 380,930 391,817 49.30% Human Resources754,699 730,731 796,666 735,050 805,620 358,477 447,143 44.50% Community Development1,366,055 1,353,476 1,479,911 1,559,721 1,502,521 747,715 754,807 49.76% Facilities Maintenance1,132,774 1,128,339 1,162,342 1,223,109 1,170,211 541,162 629,049 46.24% Information Resources1,570,712 1,421,685 1,589,432 1,526,028 1,674,937 719,101 955,837 42.93% Communications & Marketing646,841 722,199 755,940 829,732 805,674 364,461 441,214 45.24% Community Outreach26,553 24,403 27,637 12,085 - - - Engineering376,601 339,876 525,834 552,432 570,377 249,923 320,455 43.82%Total General Government8,587,772$ 8,354,352$ 9,417,985$ 9,453,190$ 10,173,905$ 4,576,737$ 5,597,168$ 44.99% Public Safety: Police9,217,988$ 9,255,342$ 9,930,681$ 9,877,014$ 10,335,497$ 5,169,882$ 5,165,615$ 50.02% Fire Protection4,407,656 4,319,457 4,657,973 4,630,520 4,813,078 2,355,820 2,457,259 48.95% Building & Energy2,419,073 2,271,301 2,544,762 2,295,910 2,555,335 1,189,057 1,366,278 46.53%Total Public Safety16,044,717$ 15,846,100$ 17,133,416$ 16,803,444$ 17,703,910$ 8,714,758$ 8,989,152$ 49.23% Operations & Recreation: Public Works Administration266,249$ 245,942$ 230,753$ 208,050$ 290,753$ 131,849$ 158,905$ 45.35% Public Works Operations3,019,017 2,809,715 3,091,857 2,998,935 3,111,481 1,381,062 1,730,419 44.39% Organized Recreation1,472,996 1,470,613 1,582,490 1,499,780 1,579,569 803,948 775,621 50.90% Recreation Center1,744,651 1,856,529 1,860,755 2,004,937 1,949,657 870,308 1,079,349 44.64% Park Maintenance1,721,732 1,797,271 1,830,530 1,866,744 1,833,297 883,031 950,267 48.17% Westwood Nature Center602,400 572,942 622,346 599,704 643,750 302,021 341,729 46.92% Natural Resources550,235 430,995 559,662 376,359 484,784 197,479 287,305 40.74% Vehicle Maintenance1,384,038 1,088,375 1,253,367 1,210,279 1,242,236 631,889 610,347 50.87%Total Operations & Recreation10,761,318$ 10,272,383$ 11,031,760$ 10,764,788$ 11,135,527$ 5,201,586$ 5,933,941$ 46.71% Non-Departmental: General 31,909$ 31,859$ 43,422$ 52,421$ -$ -$ -$ 0.00% Transfers Out- 885,000 - 1,040,000 - - - 0.00% Council Programs198,000 110,105 - - - 0.00% Contingency385,295 188,254 74,350 24,440 74,350 3,069 71,281 4.13%Total Non-Departmental417,204$ 1,105,113$ 315,772$ 1,226,966$ 74,350$ 3,069$ 71,281$ 4.13%Total General Fund Expenditures35,811,011$ 35,577,947$ 37,898,933$ 38,248,388$ 39,087,692$ 18,496,150$ 20,591,542$ 47.32%*Primarily related to E911 capital items from restricted fund balance.Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4) Title: June 2019 monthly financial reportPage 3
Budget to Actual - Enterprise FundsAs of June 30, 2019 Current BudgetJun Year To DateBudget Variance% of BudgetCurrent BudgetJun Year To DateBudget Variance% of BudgetCurrent BudgetJun Year To DateBudget Variance% of BudgetCurrent BudgetJun Year To DateBudget Variance% of BudgetOperating revenues: User charges 6,857,853$ 2,579,966$ 4,277,887$ 37.62% 7,513,922$ 2,862,985$ 4,650,937$ 38.10% 3,409,250$ 1,140,809$ 2,268,441$ 33.46% 2,900,839$ 1,251,915$ 1,648,924$ 43.16% Other 375,750 456,250 (80,500) 121.42% 30,000 9,436 20,564 31.45% 153,500 183 153,317 0.12% - - Total operating revenues7,233,603 3,036,216 4,197,387 41.97% 7,543,922 2,872,421 4,671,501 38.08% 3,562,750 1,140,992 2,421,758 32.03% 2,900,839 1,251,915 1,648,924 43.16%Operating expenses: Personal services1,397,512 719,357 678,155 51.47% 717,237 403,410 313,827 56.25% 599,774 286,125 313,649 47.71% 807,245 311,415 495,830 38.58% Supplies & non-capital324,800 126,166 198,634 38.84% 68,600 14,422 54,178 21.02% 222,550 15,244 207,306 6.85% 12,500 486 12,014 3.89% Services & other charges1,736,196 1,039,704 696,492 59.88% 4,784,255 2,766,030 2,018,225 57.82%2,952,323 1,055,485 1,896,838 35.75% 325,903 207,969 117,934 63.81% Depreciation * Total operating expenses3,458,508 1,885,227 1,573,281 54.51% 5,570,092 3,183,862 2,386,230 57.16% 3,774,647 1,356,854 2,417,793 35.95% 1,145,648 519,870 625,778 45.38%Operating income (loss)3,775,095 1,150,989 2,624,106 30.49% 1,973,830 (311,441) 2,285,271 -15.78% (211,897) (215,862) 3,965 101.87% 1,755,191 732,045 1,023,146 41.71%Nonoperating revenues (expenses): Interest income 15,172 15,172 0.00% 7,200 7,200 0.00% 18,100 18,100 0.00% 14,175 14,175 0.00% Debt issuance costs- - - - - - - Interest expense/bank charges(478,969) (253,025) (225,944) 52.83% (137,428) (43,946) (93,482) 31.98% (25,500) (3,294) (22,206) 12.92% (37,672) (10,680) (26,992) 28.35% Total nonoperating rev (exp)(463,797) (253,025) (210,772) 54.56% (130,228) (43,946) (86,282) 33.75% (7,400) (3,294) (4,106) 44.51% (23,497) (10,680) (12,817) 45.45%Income (loss) before transfers3,311,298 897,964 2,413,334 27.12% 1,843,602 (355,387) 2,198,989 -19.28% (219,297) (219,156) (141) 99.94% 1,731,694 721,365 1,010,329 41.66%Transfers inTransfers out(620,034) (310,017) (310,017) 50.00% (848,335) (424,167) (424,168) 50.00% (241,057) (120,528) (120,529) 50.00% (332,165) (166,083) (166,082) 50.00%NET INCOME (LOSS)2,691,264 587,947 2,103,317 21.85% 995,267 (779,554) 1,774,821 -78.33% (460,354) (339,684) (120,670) 73.79% 1,399,529 555,282 844,247 39.68%Items reclassified to bal sht at year end: Capital Outlay(5,383,474) (394,133) (4,989,341) 7.32% (1,530,238) (42,553) (1,487,685) 2.78%- - - (3,139,505) (42,553) (3,096,952) 1.36%Revenues over/(under) expenditures(2,692,210) 193,814 (2,886,024) (534,971) (822,107) 287,136 (460,354) (339,684) (120,670) (1,739,976) 512,729 (2,252,705) *Depreciation is recorded at end of year (non-cash item).Water SewerSolid WasteStorm WaterStudy session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 4) Title: June 2019 monthly financial reportPage 4
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Written report: 5
Executive summary
Title: Second quarter investment report (April – June 2019)
Recommended action: No action required at this time.
Policy consideration: Reporting on investments quarterly is part of our financial management
policies.
Summary: The quarterly investment report provides an overview of the City’s investment
portfolio, including the types of investments held, length of maturity and yield.
Financial or budget considerations: The total portfolio value at June 30, 2019 is $67.4 million.
Approximately $35 million is invested in longer term securities including U.S. Treasury notes,
Federal agency bonds, municipal debt securities and certificates of deposit. The remainder of
the portfolio is held in money market accounts and commercial paper for the bond construction
projects and cash flow needs between property tax settlements. The overall yield to maturity
increased to 2.23% from 2.15% the prior quarter.
Strategic priority consideration: Not applicable.
Supporting documents: Discussion
Investment portfolio summary
Prepared by: Darla Monson, Accountant
Reviewed by: Tim Simon, Chief Financial Officer
Nancy Deno, Deputy City Manager/HR Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 5) Page 2
Title: Second quarter investment report (April – June 2019)
Discussion
Background: The City’s investment portfolio is focused on short term cash flow needs and
investment in longer term securities. This is done in accordance with Minnesota Statute 118A
and the City’s investment policy objectives of: 1) Preservation of capital; 2) Liquidity; and 3)
Return on investment.
Present considerations: The portfolio value increased during the second quarter to $67.4
million at June 30, 2019 from $46.1 million at March 31, 2019. The increase is due in part to the
receipt of the 70% advance payment of the first half property tax settlement from Hennepin
County on June 21. The 2019A bonds were also issued on April 10.
The overall yield of the portfolio increased to 2.23%, compared to 2.15% at March 31 and
1.69% one year ago. This is the combined yield including both cash held in money market
accounts and long term investments. Cities will typically use a benchmark such as the two year
Treasury (1.75% on June 28, 2019) or a similar measure for yield comparison of their overall
portfolio.
There was approximately $17.2 million in money market accounts at the end of the
quarter, including bond proceeds of about $6 million. The other $11.2 million dollars in the
money market accounts along with the remainder of the property tax settlement received in
July will be needed for cash flow purposes for the August 1 debt service payments, payroll and
on-going operating expenses until the next tax settlement in early December. Money market
rates remained almost unchanged from the prior quarter at between 2.10% - 2.21%.
The other $14.5 million of unspent bond proceeds are invested in very short term
commercial paper set to mature incrementally as needed to fund construction costs for the
nature center and Cedar Lake Road projects. Commercial paper are promissory notes with
short maturity periods issued by financial institutions and large corporations and usually have
higher rates than money market accounts for investing cash in the shorter term. Rates on the
commercial paper that the bond proceeds are invested in range from 2.52% - 2.57%. There is
one other $800,000 commercial paper security in the portfolio held for cash flow purposes at
2.97% that will mature in August 2019.
Another $2.8 million of the portfolio is invested in certificates of deposit. One five year CD
with a rate of 1.9% matured during the quarter. Twelve CD’s remain in the portfolio, each with
a face value of $245,000 or less, which guarantees that each CD is insured by the FDIC up to
$250,000. The maturity dates range from 1 to 16 months and rates of 1.75% to 2.3%. Four will
mature in the third quarter.
The remaining $32 million of the portfolio is invested in other long term securities which
include municipal bonds ($3.5 mil), Federal agency bonds ($9 mil) and U.S. Treasury notes
($19.5 mil). Municipal bonds are issued by states, local governments, or school districts to
finance special projects. Agency bonds are issued by government agencies such as the Federal
Home Loan Bank and Fannie Mae and may have call dates where they can be called prior to
final maturity. One $2 million municipal debt security matured on May 1 and was not
reinvested due to cash flow needs at the time. Currently five year U.S. Treasuries have lower
rates than the money markets accounts.
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 5) Page 3
Title: Second quarter investment report (April – June 2019)
This table is a summary of the City’s portfolio at June 30, 2019:
Next steps: None at this time.
3/31/19 6/30/19
<1 Year 35% 55%
1-2 Years 15% 16%
2-3 Years 22% 14%
3-4 Years 23% 13%
>4 Years 5% 2%
3/31/19 6/30/19
Money Markets/Cash $8,908,277 $17,242,159
Commercial Paper $792,624 $15,266,157
Certificates of Deposit $3,075,973 $2,841,941
Municipal Debt $5,441,074 $3,453,645
Agencies/Treasuries $27,865,991 $28,582,216
City of St. Louis Park
Investment Portfolio Summary
June 30, 2019
Institution/Broker Investment Type CUSIP Maturity Date Yield Par Value
Market Value at
6/30/2019
Estimated Avg
Annual Income
Citizens Indep Bank Money Market 0.17%1,473 1,473 3
4M Liquid Asset Money Market 2.10%10,606,527 10,606,527 222,737
4M Plus Money Market (bond proceeds)2.16%3,923,054 3,923,054 84,738
UBS Institutional Money Market 2.21% 564,920 564,920 12,485
UBS Institutional Money Market (bond proceeds)2.21% 2,146,185 2,146,185 47,431
17,242,159
UBS Comm Paper - Great West Life & Annuity Ins 39136SUN1 07/22/2019 2.54% 3,000,000 2,995,260 76,080
UBS Comm Paper - Central American Bank 15239CUQ5 07/24/2019 2.57% 3,000,000 2,994,840 76,967
UBS Comm Paper - Korea Development Bank NY 5006E1UV4 07/29/2019 2.52% 2,500,000 2,494,875 62,871
UBS Comm Paper - Santander UK PLC 80285QUX6 07/31/2019 2.54% 3,000,000 2,993,550 76,036
UBS Comm Paper - Banque Et Caisse Epargne 0667K1VL2 08/20/2019 2.52% 3,000,000 2,989,680 75,340
PFM Comm Paper - BNP Paribas NY Branch 09659CV62 08/06/2019 2.97% 800,000 797,952 23,760
15,266,157
PFM CD - Amer Exp F UT 02587CAC4 07/10/2019 1.95% 240,000 239,976 4,680
PFM CD - Capital One Bank 14042E4S6 07/15/2019 1.95% 240,000 239,954 4,680
PFM CD - First Bk Highland IL 3191408W2 08/13/2019 2.00% 240,000 239,909 4,800
PFM CD - Webster Bk NA CT 94768NJX3 08/20/2019 1.90% 240,000 239,890 4,560
PFM CD - Capital One Bank 140420PS3 10/08/2019 2.10% 240,000 239,921 5,040
PFM CD - State Bk India IL 856283XJ0 10/15/2019 2.10% 240,000 239,930 5,040
PFM CD - Goldman Sachs Bank NY 38148JHB0 01/14/2020 2.20% 240,000 240,094 5,280
PFM CD - Amer Express UT 02587DXE3 01/30/2020 1.95% 240,000 239,762 4,680
PFM CD - Camden Nat'l Bank ME 133033DR8 02/26/2020 1.80% 240,000 239,810 4,320
PFM CD - Private Bank & Tr IL 74267GVA2 02/27/2020 1.75% 240,000 239,885 4,200
PFM CD - World's Foremost 9159919E5 08/06/2020 2.30% 200,000 197,602 4,600
PFM CD - Comenity Cap Bk UT 20033AND4 10/13/2020 2.00% 245,000 245,208 4,900
2,841,941
PFM Muni Debt - New York City 64971WUX6 08/01/2019 1.33% 2,000,000 1,999,360 26,600
PFM Muni Debt - Connecticut St 20772JKN1 10/15/2020 1.78% 1,000,000 997,260 17,800
PFM Muni Debt - California St 13063DGA0 04/01/2021 2.80% 450,000 457,025 12,600
3,453,645
PFM FNMA 3135G0T60 07/30/2020 1.60%1,250,000 1,243,763 20,000
PFM US Treasury Note 912828L32 08/31/2020 1.09% 600,000 596,298 6,540
PFM FHLB 3130ACE26 09/28/2020 1.48% 575,000 571,205 8,510
PFM FHLMC 3137EAEJ4 09/29/2020 1.69% 530,000 528,198 8,957
PFM FHLMC 3137EAEK1 11/17/2020 1.91% 800,000 799,752 15,280
PFM US Treasury Note 912828N48 12/31/2020 1.02% 150,000 149,801 1,530
PFM US Treasury Note 912828N48 12/31/2020 1.12% 750,000 749,003 8,400
PFM Freddie Mac 3137EAEL9 02/16/2021 2.47% 800,000 806,928 19,760
PFM Fannie Mae 3135G0U27 04/13/2021 2.55% 500,000 505,835 12,750
PFM US Treasury Note 912828Q78 04/30/2021 1.86% 250,000 248,155 4,650
PFM US Treasury Note 912828Q78 04/30/2021 1.87% 675,000 670,019 12,623
PFM US Treasury Note 912828R77 05/31/2021 2.02% 1,600,000 1,588,000 32,320
PFM Fannie Mae 3135G0U35 06/22/2021 2.76% 700,000 712,642 19,320
PFM FHLB Global 3130A8QS5 07/14/2021 1.25% 750,000 740,655 9,375
PFM US Treasury Note 912828D72 08/31/2021 1.73% 650,000 653,452 11,245
PFM US Treasury Note 912828D72 08/31/2021 1.85% 1,150,000 1,156,107 21,275
PFM FHLB 3130AEXV7 09/20/2021 3.00% 750,000 751,028 22,500
PFM FHLB 3130AF5B9 10/12/2021 3.02% 750,000 769,980 22,650
PFM US Treasury Note 912828T67 10/31/2021 1.72% 700,000 692,209 12,040
PFM US Treasury Note 912828T67 10/31/2021 1.64% 575,000 568,600 9,430
PFM US Treasury Note 912828T67 10/31/2021 1.85% 200,000 197,774 3,700
PFM FNMA 3135G0U92 01/11/2022 2.65% 400,000 408,308 10,600
PFM US Treasury Note 912828X47 04/30/2022 1.96% 700,000 702,814 13,720
PFM US Treasury Note 912828X47 04/30/2022 2.12% 850,000 853,417 18,020
PFM US Treasury Note 912828X47 04/30/2022 2.18% 800,000 803,216 17,440
PFM US Treasury Note 912828X47 04/30/2022 2.69% 1,300,000 1,305,226 34,970
PFM US Treasury Note 912828TJ9 08/15/2022 2.76% 1,050,000 1,046,798 28,980
PFM US Treasury Note 912828N30 12/31/2022 3.00% 950,000 962,949 28,500
PFM US Treasury Note 912828N30 12/31/2022 2.78% 1,000,000 1,013,630 27,800
PFM US Treasury Note 912828N30 12/31/2022 2.51% 2,550,000 2,584,757 64,005
PFM US Treasury Note 912828N30 12/31/2022 2.55% 1,675,000 1,697,830 42,713
PFM US Treasury Note 912828R69 05/31/2023 2.53% 1,000,000 996,062 25,300
PFM US Treasury Note 912828R69 05/31/2023 1.83% 350,000 348,619 6,405
PFM Fannie Mae 3135G0V34 02/05/2024 2.58% 625,000 643,781 16,125
PFM FHLB 3130AFW94 02/13/2024 2.58% 500,000 515,405 12,900
28,582,216
GRAND TOTAL 67,386,118 1,502,559
Current Portfolio Yield To Maturity 2.23%
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 5)
Title: Second quarter investment report (April – June 2019)Page 4
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Written report: 6
Executive summary
Title: Housing Authority (HA) Board 2019 annual work plan
Recommended action: Review the 2019 annual work plan for the HA Board of commissioners.
Policy consideration: Does the annual work plan address the strategic priorities of the city
council, comprehensive plan goals and the HA Board’s mission and regulatory responsibilities?
Summary: The St. Louis Park HA was created and authorized to oversee the administration of
the HA’s low- and moderate-income housing programs and any housing programs for low- and
moderate-income households which the council or the EDA delegates to the HA. The HA
Board’s annual work plan is attached for review. There are three initiatives identified for 2019
The initiatives identified include:
•Oversee the administration of the Housing Authority’s core federally funded rental
assistance programs including review and approval of program policies
•Oversee the administration of programs that support/promote a well maintained housing
stock through the use of the city’s housing rehab and design programs
•Explore/support/provide input on strategies to promote the creation and preservation of
affordable rental and homeownership options for low and moderate income households
in the community including both new construction and preservation of existing naturally
occurring affordable housing and make recommendations to city council.
These initiatives were also shared with the city council at the February 25, 2019, annual
meeting of boards and commissions.
Due to difficulty identifying a council meeting agenda that accommodates both the council’s
schedule and the HA board’s availability, a written report identifying the HA Board’s 2019 work
plan is being submitted to council. If the council would like to meet to discuss the work plan,
staff will continue to seek a future meeting date that that will accommodate both the council’s
and the HA Board of commissioner’s availability.
Financial or budget considerations: Financial resources for affordable housing programs
include federal, county and city funding.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: Housing Authority Board annual work plan
Prepared by: Michele Schnitker, CD Deputy Director and Housing Supervisor
Reviewed by: Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: July 22, 2019
Updated:
1
Housing Authority Board
Time
Frame
Initiative Strategic
Priorities
Purpose
(see page 2 for definitions)
Outcome (fill in after
completed)
2019 Oversee the administration of the
Housing Authority’s core federally
funded rental assistance programs
including review and approval of
program policies, ensuring sound
fiscal policies and funding
administration, approving the
submission of competitive grant
applications to secure new and
renewal funding and review and
approval of the 5 year capital
improvement plan for the Public
Housing properties.
☐New
Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative
☒Ongoing
Responsibility
☒1 ☐ 2 ☒ 3
☐4 ☐ 5
☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☒Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
2019 Oversee the administration of programs
that support/promote a well
maintained housing stock through the
use of the city’s housing rehab and
design programs including the Move-
Up-In-The-Park programs, the Discount
Loan Programs, the Emergency Rehab
Grants and the HIA designation.
Continue to explore opportunities to
address unmet housing rehab needs.
☐New
Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative
☒Ongoing
Responsibility
☒1 ☐ 2 ☒ 3
☐4 ☐ 5
☐N/A
☐Commission Initiated Project
☒Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 6)
Title: Housing Authority (HA) Board 2019 annual work plan Page 2
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: August 26, 2019
Updated:
2
City of St. Louis Park Strategic Priorities
1.St. Louis Park is committed to being a leader in racial equity and inclusion in order to create a more just and inclusive community for all.
2.St. Louis Park is committed to continue to lead in environmental stewardship.
3.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood oriented development.
4.St. Louis Park is committed to providing a variety of options for people to make their way around the city comfortably, safely and reliably.
5.St. Louis Park is committed to creating opportunities to build social capital through community engagement
OR Other
Purpose: definitions
2019 Explore/support/provide input on
proposed strategies to promote the
creation and preservation of
affordable rental and homeownership
options for low and moderate income
households in the community
including both new construction and
preservation of existing naturally
occurring affordable housing.
☒New
Initiative
☒Continued
Initiative
☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☒1 ☐ 2 ☒ 3
☐4 ☐ 5
☐N/A
☒Commission Initiated Project
☒Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
2019 ☐New
Initiative
☐Continued
Initiative
☐Ongoing
Responsibility
☐1 ☐ 2 ☐ 3
☐4 ☐ 5
☐N/A
☐Commission Initiated Project
☒Council Initiated Project
☐Report Findings (council requested)
☐Formal Recommendation (council
requested)
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 6)
Title: Housing Authority (HA) Board 2019 annual work plan Page 3
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: August 26, 2019
Updated:
3
Modifications:
Work plans may be modified, to add or delete items, in one of three ways:
•Work plans can be modified by mutual agreement during a joint work session.
•If immediate approval is important, the board or commission can work with their staff liaison to present a modified work plan for city
council approval at a council meeting.
•The city council can direct a change to the work plan at their discretion.
Parking Lot
•Project initiated by the board or commission
Commission Initiated Project
•Project tasked to a board or commission by the city council
Council Initiated Project
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and report its findings or comments to the city council in
writing
•No direct action is taken by the board/commission
Report Findings
•Initiated by the city council
•Board and commission will study a specific issue or topic and makes a formal recommendation to the city council on
what action to take
•A recommendation requires a majoirty of the commissioners' support
Formal Recommandation
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 6)
Title: Housing Authority (HA) Board 2019 annual work plan Page 4
Board and Commission
Annual Workplan
Approved: August 26, 2019
Updated:
4
Items that are being considered by the board/commission but not proposed in the annual work plan. Council approval is needed if the
board/commission decides they would like to move forward with an initiative.
Initiative Comments:
Fair Housing Staff is drafting a Fair Housing Policy to confirm the city’s support of fair housing and to designate a city staff
person to provide resources information and referrals to constituents.
In addition, the HA will administer the affordable housing programs in conformity with the Civil Rights Act of
1964, the Fair Housing Act, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and title II of the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, and will affirmatively further fair housing by examining programs or proposed programs
with a race and equity lens, identifying any impediments to fair housing choice within those program.
Support Council’s Strategic
Goals
The work of the Housing Authority Board to oversee the administration of the federally funded rental assistance
programs, as well as the city’s new and existing housing programs and initiatives supports several of the city’s
strategic priorities but most directly supports the following:
St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of housing and neighborhood-oriented development.
Study session meeting of July 22, 2019 (Item No. 6)
Title: Housing Authority (HA) Board 2019 annual work plan Page 5
Meeting: Study session
Meeting date: July 22, 2019
Written report: 7
Executive summary
Title: Food security and access study update
Recommended action: No action at this time. The purpose of this report is to update the city
council about the community assessment study of food security and access that is underway by
the city’s consultant, Wilder Research.
Policy consideration: This study is consistent with the goals and strategies identified in the
2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Summary: One of the goals in the city’s health section of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan is to
“Ensure all in our community have access to healthy food.” The strategies associated with this
goal are to:
1)Conduct a detailed study to assess food accessibility and security in the community,
and determine if there are any gaps; and
2)Determine what steps the city can take to address gaps in food access and security.
For the first part of the study, Wilder Research staff completed interviews with key informants
around the community to gain an understanding of the issues surrounding this topic. Key
informant interviews included STEP, Perspectives Kid’s Café, Park Nicollet Foundation and
Clinic, Hennepin County Human Services, St. Louis Park School Nutrition Department, SEEDs,
Jewish Family and Children Services, among others. Wilder is currently conducting focus groups
and surveys with residents who may be impacted by food insecurity, as well as interviewing
individuals who can share their personal experiences with food insecurity and access in St. Louis
Park. Wilder is also in the process of researching and mapping data to better understand what
food issues exist in St. Louis Park. From this information, Wilder will develop recommendations
and strategies around ways in which the city can support greater food access and security for
residents.
The study is expected to be finalized this fall.
Financial or budget considerations: The budget for this work is $50,000 and will be paid for
through the 2019 Development Fund budget.
Strategic priority consideration: St. Louis Park is committed to providing a broad range of
housing and neighborhood oriented development.
Supporting documents: None
Prepared by: Meg J. McMonigal, Principal Planner
Reviewed by: Laura Smith, Wellness & Volunteer Coordinator
Karen Barton, Community Development Director
Approved by: Tom Harmening, City Manager