HomeMy WebLinkAbout13-068 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 2013/05/06RESOLUTION NO. 13-068
RESOLUTION ADOPTING A MODIFICATION TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 1,
ESTABLISHING THE ELIOT PARK TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
DISTRICT THEREIN AND ADOPTING A TAX INCREMENT
FINANCING PLAN THEREFOR
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council (the "Council") of the City of St. Louis Park,
Minnesota (the "City"), as follows:
Section 1. Recitals
1.01. The Board of Commissioners of the St. Louis Park Economic Development
Authority (the "EDA") has heretofore established Redevelopment Project No. 1 and adopted the
Redevelopment Plan therefor. It has been proposed by the EDA and the City that the City adopt a
Modification to the Redevelopment Plan for Redevelopment Project No. 1 (the "Redevelopment
Plan Modification") and establish the Eliot Park Tax Increment Financing Distnct (the "District")
therein and adopt a Tax Increment Financing Plan (the "TIF Plan") therefor (the Redevelopment
Plan Modification and the TIF Plan are referred to collectively herein as the "Plans"); all
pursuant to and in conformity with applicable law, including Minnesota Statutes, Sections
469.090 to 469.1082 and Sections 469.174 to 469.1799, all inclusive, as amended (the "Act"), all
as reflected in the Plans and presented for the Council's consideration.
1.02. The City has investigated the facts relating to the Plans and has caused the Plans
to be prepared.
1.03. The City has performed all actions required by law to be performed prior to the
establishment of the District and the adoption and approval of the proposed Plans, including, but
not limited to, notification of Hennepin County and Independent School District No. 283 having
taxing jurisdiction over the property to be included in the District, a review of and wntten
comment on the Plans by the City Planning Commission on Apnl 17, 2013, approval of the
Plans by the EDA on May 6, 2013, and the holding of a public hearing upon published notice as
required by law.
1.04. Certain written reports (the "Reports") relating to the Plans and to the activities
contemplated therein have heretofore been prepared by staff and consultants and submitted to the
Council and/or made a part of the City files and proceedings on the Plans. The Reports,
including the redevelopment qualifications reports and planning documents, include data,
information and/or substantiation constituting or relating to the basis for the other findings and
determinations made in this resolution. The Council hereby confirms, ratifies and adopts the
Reports, which are hereby incorporated into and made as fully a part of this resolution to the
same extent as if set forth in full herein.
1.05. The City is not modifying the boundanes of Redevelopment Project No. 1, but is
modifying the Redevelopment Plan therefor.
Section 2. Findings for the Adoption and Approval of the Redevelopment Plan Modification.
2.01. The Council approves the Redevelopment Plan Modification, and specifically
finds that: (a) the land within the Project area would not be available for redevelopment without
the financial aid to be sought under the Redevelopment Plan Modification; (b) the
Redevelopment Plan, as modified, will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs
of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project by private enterprise; and (c) that the
Resolution No. 13-068 -2-
Redevelopment Plan, as modified, conforms to the general plan for the development of the City
as a whole.
Section 3. Findings for the Establishment of Eliot Park Tax Increment Financing Distnct
3.01. The Council hereby finds that the District is in the public interest and is a
"redevelopment district" under Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.174, Subd. 10(a)(1) of the Act.
3.02. The Council further finds that the proposed redevelopment would not occur solely
through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and that the increased
market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax
increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from
the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for
the maximum duration of the District permitted by the Tax Increment Financing Plan, that the
Plans conforms to the general plan for the development or redevelopment of the City as a whole;
and that the Plans will afford maximum opportunity consistent with the sound needs of the City
as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of the Distnct by private enterprise.
3.03. The Council further finds, declares and determines that the City made the above
findings stated in this Section and has set forth the reasons and supporting facts for each
determination in wnting, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
3.04. The Council further finds that the EDA has elected to calculate fiscal disparities
for the District in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177, Subd. 3, clause b, which
means any fiscal disparities contribution would be taken from inside the District.
Section 4. Public Purpose
4.01. The adoption of the Plans conforms in all respects to the requirements of the Act
and will help fulfill a need to develop an area of the City which is already built up, to provide
employment opportunities, to improve the tax base and to improve the general economy of the
State and thereby serves a public purpose. For the reasons described in Exhibit A, the City
believes these benefits directly derive from the tax increment assistance provided under the TIF
Plan. A private developer will receive only the assistance needed to make this development
financially feasible. As such, any private benefits received by a developer are incidental and do
not outweigh the primary public benefits.
Section 5. Approval and Adoption of the Plans
5.01. The Plans, as presented to the Council on this date, including without limitation
the findings and statements of objectives contained therein, are hereby approved, ratified,
established, and adopted and shall be placed on file in the office of the Economic Development
Director.
5.02. The staff of the City, the City's advisors and legal counsel are authorized and
directed to proceed with the implementation of the Plans and to negotiate, draft, prepare and
present to this Council for its consideration all further plans, resolutions, documents and
contracts necessary for this purpose.
5.03 The Auditor of Hennepin County is requested to certify the original net tax
capacity of the District, as described in the Plans, and to certify in each year thereafter the
amount by which the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased; and the St. Louis Park
-Resolution'No. 13-068 ;
Economic Development Authority is authorized and directed to forthwith transmit this request to
the County Auditor in such form and content as the Auditor may specify, together with a list of
all properties. within the ,District, for which building permits have been issued during the 18
months immediately preceding the adoption of this°resolution.
5.04. The Economic Development Director is further authorized and directed to file ,a
copy of the Plans with the Commissioner` of the ,Minnesota Department of Revenue and the
Office . :State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 469.175, Subd. 4a.
Reviewe, fo s ministration Adopter y the City Council May 6, 2013
City M
Attest:
City Clerk
Clerk
Mayor
Resolution No. 13-068
-4-
EXHIBIT A
RESOLUTION NO. 13-068
The reasons and facts supporting the findings for the adoption of the Tax Increment Financing
Plan (TIF Plan) for the Eliot Park Tax Increment Financing Distnct (District), as required
pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.175, Subdivision 3, are as follows:
1. Finding that the District is a redevelopment district as defined in M.S., Section 469.174,
Subd. 10(a)(1).
The District consists of 2 parcels, with plans to redevelop the area for residential purposes.
At least 70 percent of the area of the parcels in the District is occupied by buildings, streets,
utilities, paved or gravel parking lots or other similar structures, and more than 50 percent of
the buildings in the District, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard to a
degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. (See Appendix F of the TIF Plan.)
2. Finding that the proposed development, in the opinion of the City Council, would not
reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably
foreseeable future and that the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be
expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase
in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the
present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the District
permitted by the TIF Plan.
The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to
occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future: The site is
occupied by a former school building. The proposed development -138 units of
apartments—will require demolition and clearance of the site, including costly hazardous
waste abatement within the school building. Further, based on analysis of the developer's
pro forma, the City has determined that a gap needs to be filled through tax increment in
order to make the proposed development financially feasible. The City therefore does not
believe the proposed housing facility is likely to occur without the assistance described in
this TIF Plan.
While the property could be sold to another developer for some other use, other
development scenarios are not feasible in the market due to various constraints. First,
adaptive reuse of the building would produce far less market value than the proposed 138 -
unit housing facility. Second, commercial development is not feasible due to inadequate
market location and it is unlikely that spot zoning would be supported (changing the zoning
to commercial for only one parcel) due to the surrounding land use, which is predominately
residential and consists of single-family homes.
The City has required the developer to abide by a "look back" provision, which measures
the actual development costs versus the project revenues and costs. If the developer
achieves a higher than market rate return, the amount of TIF assistance will be reduced.
The increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without
the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in market value estimated
to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected
tax increments for the maximum duration of the District permitted by the TIF Plan: This
•
Resolution No. 13-068 -5-
finding is justified on the grounds that the cost of site and public improvements add to the
total redevelopment cost. It should be noted that any alternative redevelopment scenario
faces the same high land cost, demolition/clearance costs and structured parking costs faced
by the proposed developer, and in the City's experience, properties with challenges similar
to those posed by this property have not been redeveloped in St. Louis Park without
significant public assistance. The City reasonably determines that no other redevelopment
of similar scope is anticipated on this site without substantially similar assistance being
provided to the development.
Therefore, the City concludes as follows:
a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the entire District will
increase without the use of tax increment financing is $0.
b. If the proposed development occurs, the total increase in market value will be
$15,650,420 (see Appendix D and G of the TIF Plan)
c. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the
district permitted by the TIF Plan is estimated to be $4,931,183 (see Appendix D and
G of the TIF Plan).
d. Even if some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the
Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value
increase greater than $10,719,237 (the amount in clause b less the amount in clause
c) without tax increment assistance.
3. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District conforms to the general plan for the development
or redevelopment of the municipality as a whole.
The Planning Commission reviewed the TIF Plan and found that the TIF Plan conforms to
the general development plan of the City.
4. Finding that the TIF Plan for the District will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with
the sound needs of the City as a whole, for the development or redevelopment of
Redevelopment Project No. 1 by private enterprise.
The project to be assisted by the District will result in increased and diversified housing
stock in the City and the State of Minnesota, the renovation of substandard properties,
increased tax base of the City and State, and the addition of a high-quality development in
the City.
Through the implementation of the TIF Plan, the EDA or City will increase the availability
of safe and decent life -cycle housing in the City.