Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-108 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 2006/06/191 RESOLUTION NO. 06-108 RESOLUTION OF DENIAL RESOLUTION OF FINDING REGARDING THE APPLICATION FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH VARIANCES TO LOT SIZE, LOT WIDTH AND MAXIMUM DRIVEWAY AND PARKING AREA IN FRONT YARD FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-1 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT AT 1650 TEXAS AVENUE SOUTH BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota 1. On February 21, 2006 Parkway Development, LLC submitted an application for approval of preliminary plat of Junior High Addition, variance for lot size to allow the subdivision of the parcel into two lots, and variance to the required maximum paved front driveway and parking area for property located in the R-1 Single Family District, at 1650 Texas Avenue South for the following legal description, to wit: Parcel 1: That part of Lot 6, `Beebe's Out Lots," which lies west of the west line of Texas Avenue and that part of the adjoining vacated Morton Street, as dedicated in the plat of `Beebe's Out Lots" lying south of the extension across it of the north line of said Lot 6; all of which lies Northeasterly of a line drawn from a point 168.93 feet Northeasterly of the point of beginning of the following descnbed line, as measured along said line, which line is descnbed as beginning at a point in the West line of Section 5, Township 117, Range 21, distance 410.65 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Section 5; thence in a Northeasterly direction a distance of 1019.4 feet to a point 494.7 feet East of a point in the West line of said Section 5, said last mentioned point being 1319 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Section 5, drawn to the most Southerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, "Country Club Addition of Westwood Hills." Parcel 2: That part of the South 75 feet of Lot 7, measured along the Westerly line thereof, which lies west of the Southeasterly line of the road described in deed Doc. No. 184005 that part of the adjoining vacated Morton Street lying between the extensions across it of the North and South lines of the South 75 feet of said Lot 7, measured along the Westerly line thereof; All in Beebe's Out Lots Parcel 3: That part of Outlot 1, which lies Northeasterly of a line described as commencing at a point in the West line of Section 5, Township 117, Range 21, distant 410.65 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Section 5 and said point being hereinafter known as Point A; thence in a Northeasterly direction a distance of 168.93 feet to the beginning of the line to be described, said 168.93 feet being measured along a line which extends to a point that is 1019.4 feet from said Point A and 494.7 feet East of a point in the West line of said Section 5 said last mentioned point being 1319 feet North of the Southwest corner of said Section 5; thence Northwesterly passing through the most Southerly corner of Lot 1, Block 1, "Country Club Addition of Westwood Hills". 2. On March 15, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public heanng, received testimony from the public, discussed the application and recommended denial of preliminary plat with variances on a vote of 3-1-1. On May 17, 2006, the Planning Commission held a public hearing Resolution No. 06-108 -2- on the lot width variance, received testimony from the public, discussed the application and recommended approval of the variance due to its minor amount of deviation from the zoning standard. 3. Based on the testimony, evidence presented, and files and records, the Planning Commission makes the following findings: a. The requested lot size and driveway variances do not meet the requirements of Section 36-33(d) of the Zoning Ordinance necessary to be met for the City Council to grant variances. There are no factors related to the shape, size or other extraordinary conditions on the lot which prevent a reasonable use. b. Granting of the requested variances is not necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right. The property has a single family home on it which can be fully utilized. c. Granting of the lot size variance would be contrary to the intent and provisions of the Zoning Ordinance since, if granted, it would permit smaller lots than allowed by the R-1 zoning district standards. Granting the driveway variance would be contrary to the intent of the R-1 district to have a maximum paved area in front yards. d. There are no demonstrable or undue hardships from under the terms of the Zoning Ordinance or Minnesota Statue, and therefore, conditions necessary for granting the requested variances do not exist. e. The conditions applying to the structure or land in question are not peculiar to the property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the R-1 zoning district. The topography on this site is similar to the other lots in the area. f.. The proposed Preliminary Plat does not meet the Zoning Ordinance requirements for minimum lot size and lot width in the R-1 District, and therefore is not found to be in all respects consistent with the City Plan and the regulations and requirements of the laws of the State of Minnesota and the ordinances of the City of St. Louis Park. 4. The contents of Planning Case Files 06-15-S and 06 -16 -VAR are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. CLUSION e a • i licant's requests for variances to lot size, lot width and maximum driveway and parking ea in ont yards, and preliminary plat approval, are hereby denied based on the findings set forth ab • ve. Revi w ►, �� City' • ager r Administration: Attest optethe City Council June 19, 2006 C; y /