Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-074 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 2002/07/15• • RESOLUTION NO. 02-074 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION 36-367 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED C-2 COMMERCIAL LOCATED AT 3532, 3540, and 3550 BELT LINE BOULEVARD and 3533 RALEIGH AVENUE WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) was received on May 20, 2002 from the applicant, and WHEREAS, notice of a public heanng on the Preliminary PUD was mailed to all owners of property within 350 feet of the subject property plus other affected property owners in the vicinity and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Preliminary PUD concept at the meeting of June 19, 2002, and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the Preliminary PUD was published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on June 5, 2002, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing at the meeting of June 19, 2002, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary PUD on a 5-0 vote with all members present voting in the affirmative, and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments in the record of decision. BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park: Findings 1. Belt Line Industrial Park, Inc. (John D McCain) has made application to the City Council for a Planned Unit Development under Section 36-367 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the C-2 Commercial distract located at 3532, 3540, and 3550 Belt Line Boulevard and 3533 Raleigh Avenue for the legal descnption as follows, to -wit: Lot 3, Block 2, Belt Line Industrial Park, 2nd and Parcel B (a portion of Lot 1, Block 2 of Belt Line Industnal Park 2°d Addition) 2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 02 -31 -PUD) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. Resolution No 02-074 -2- 3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detnmental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it cause senous traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested modifications comply with the requirements of Section 36-367(b)(5). 4 The contents of Planning Case File 02 -31 -PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Conclusion The Preliminary Planned Unit Development at the location descnbed is approved based on the findings set forth above and subject to the following conditions: 1. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with the official exhibits, subject to approved plan changes through the final PUD process. 2. Pnor to final PUD consideration, applicant shall submit complete final application matenals, which shall comply with the following: a. Final PUD plans shall address issues as noted in the staff report including landscaping, building elevations and matenals, tree replacement, site lighting, and signage plans b. Final plat documents shall show dedication of West 364h Street as nght-of-way. c. A phasing plan for demolition and redevelopment that provides required parking for the construction of the building in phase 1. d. Final PUD plans shall provide plans for the required bufferyards between the mailbox and the adjacent property and the bank dnve through and the adjacent property. e. Final PUD plans shall include pavement stnping, and directional arrows and directional signage for the mailbox locations. f. Final PUD plans shall provide screening of the trash/service area on the east side of the bank/office building that includes a bufferyard F with a 10' high architectural wall the matches the extenor of the building. Such architectural wall can be eliminated if the trash service can be moved to the west side of the building and the service/loading can be moved or served from the parking lot curb with a continuous sidewalk along the north side of the building. 3 Final PUD approval and development is contingent upon developer meeting all conditions of final approval including all Minnehaha Creek Watershed Distnct requirements. 4 Pnor to any site work, the developer shall meet the following requirements: a. A copy of the Watershed District permit shall be forwarded to the City. b. Any other necessary permits from other agencies shall be obtained. c. Sign assent form and official exhibits. d. Meet conditions of City signing final plat. e. Required erosion control permits, utility permits and other required permits shall be obtained from the City. 5. Pnor to issuance of any building permits, which may impose additional requirements, the developer shall comply with the following. a. Meet any Fire Department emergency access requirements for dunng construction. • • • f Resolution No. 02-074 -3- b. The subdivider shall furnish the City with evidence of recording of the final plat and parking easement. c. Building matenals samples to be submitted to and approved by City. d. A lighting plan and photometncs and imgation plan meeting the ordinance regulations shall be submitted to and approved by the community development department. 6. A PUD ordinance modification to allow 239 parking stalls, including proof of parking stalls, rather than the required 275 stalls is contingent upon final PUD approval. 7. Should the Zoning Administrator determine that parking is a problem in the future, the City may require proof of parking to be converted to parking. 8. A PUD ordinance modification to allow setbacks as shown on the approved preliminary PUD exhibits is contingent upon final PUD approval. 9. The developer shall comply with the following conditions dunng construction: a. All City noise ordinances shall be complied with, including that there be no construction activity between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. weekdays and 10 p.m. and 9 a.m. weekends and holidays. b. The site shall be kept free of dust and debns that could blow onto neighbonng properties. c Public streets shall be maintained free of dirt and shall be cleaned as necessary. d. The Zoning Administrator may impose additional conditions if it becomes necessary in order to mitigate the impact of construction on surrounding properties. 10. A six foot concrete sidewalk along the west side of Beltline Boulevard adjacent to the subject parcel are to be installed by the developer per the approved preliminary site plan, and construction plans to be submitted and approved by Public Works. The property owner will be responsible for maintaining the sidewalks. 11. The developer shall provide the required number of replacement trees on site or a combination of on-site trees and cash in lieu of trees. The Community Development Director and Parks and Recreation Director shall approve the cash equivalent amount. 12. The following conversions of uses are allowed without amending the PUD: a. Post office to retail/service or administration offices. b. Bank to administrative offices. 13. The developer or owner shall pay an administrative fee of $750 per violation of any condition of this approval. 14. The development shall comply in all respects with any conditions for Plat approval and all other City Ordinances. Reviewed for Administration: Ad by . e C Council July 15, 2002 Attest: Ci ' Clerk May