Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout97-43 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1997/04/07RESOLUTION NO. 97 - 43 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PAYMENT FOR EXCELSIOR BOULEVARD EASEMENT ACQUISITION FROM MONTEREY DRIVE TO FRANCE AVENUE PROJECT NO. 96-22 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park has received a report from the City Engineer related to the streetscape improvements on Excelsior Boulevard from Monterey Drive to France Avenue as specified under Project No. 96-22; and WHEREAS, the streetscape improvements on Excelsior Boulevard requires the acquisition of certain easements to accommodate the proposed project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park, Minnesota, that: 1. The City Council fully advised of the pertinent facts hereby authorizes payment for the easements to accommodate the Excelsior Boulevard streetscape improvements from Monterey Drive to France Avenue. 2. Payment for said easements shall be in accordance with the following: Parcel No, Property Owner Final Award 5 and 7 Lyndly F. Opitz & Associates, Inc. $11,413.31 6 Donald M. Wenner and Joyce C. Wenner $1,086.75 13 Sela Roofing and Remodeling, Inc. $1,026.27 17 and 18 Al's Liquor Store, Inc. $8,443.31 19 John R. Rossman and Etta May Rossman $1,661.72 21 James M. Maloney and Myrna M. Maloney $4,125.47 22 and 26 H. Miller Realty Co. $3,547.67 23 A & A Agency, Inc. $899.64 25 Reuben L. Anderson-Cherne, Inc. $2,253.42 27 Gary James $441.00 28 Richard H. Hogan and Gladys G. Hogan $1,092.00 29 John A. Miller and Wanda W. Miller $391.30 (continued) Attest: 30 Terrance H. Williams and Joan S. Williams $302.40 31 Joann Armstrong $302.40 32 Martin G. Fowler and Alice J. Fowler $602.00 33 Elmer G. Nordstrom and Marion L. Nordstrom $653.80 34, 35 and 36 Kooros M. Rejali and Grace R. Rejali $1,327.90 42 Koval Furniture & Appliance Co. $1,264.55 45 JEM Enterprises, L.L.C. $3,539.57 46 Clifford R. Gustafson and Joan E. Gustafson $1.611.09 -----'---C . a( TOTAL = $45,985.57 Adopted by the City Council April 7, 1997 Ci fv Clerk Reviewed for administration: