HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-189 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1996/12/02RESOLUTION NO. 96:189
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 96-152 APPROVED ON OCTOBER 7,
1996 APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER
SECTION 14:6-7 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO
ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED COMMERCIAL AND HIGH-DENSITY
MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT
3601 PARK CENTER BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, The City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-113 approving the Preliminary
PUD on August 5, 1996 and
WHEREAS, a complete application for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) was
received on August 23, 1996 , and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD at its meeting meeting of
September 18, 1996, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final PUD subject
to the 9 conditions in the staff report on a 4-1 vote with four members present voting in the
affirmative and one member voting against, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission
minutes and testimony of those appearing at the meeting or otherwise including comments in the
record of decision.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-152 approving the Final PUD
on October 7, 1996, and
WHEREAS, the legal description and address in Resolution No. 96-15 have been found to
be incorrect and are hereby corrected by approval of a new resolution on December 2, 1996.
BE IT RESOLVE) BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. G & P Properties, Inc. and Stewardship Properties III made application to the City Council for
a Final Planned Unit Development under Section 14:6-7 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code
within the district located at 3601 Park Center Boulevard for the legal description as follows, to -
wit:
Lot 1, Block 2, Park Center, St. Louis Park, Minnesota
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission
(Case No. 96 -16 -PUD) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety and welfare of
the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on
values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and
compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property
values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested
modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7.2(E).
4. The contents of Planning Case File 96 -16 -PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the
public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Final Planned Unit Development at the location described is approved based on the findings
set forth above and subject to the following conditions:
A. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibit A:
Demolition Plan, Exhibit B: Site Plan, Exhibit C: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control
Plan, Exhibit D: Landscape Plan, Exhibits E and F: Elevations, Exhibit G: Fence,
Enclosure Designs, and the following conditions:
1. Approval of the Final PUD does not grant any concept approval for future phases
of development involving the property.
2. Approval of the Final PUD is contingent upon City Council approval of an
amendment to the Continued Special Permit for the Parkshore Place apartment
property to address associated improvements involving that property; approval of
the Final PUD is further contingent upon adherence by the applicant to any
conditions of such Special Permit approval.
3. Approval of the Final PUD includes modification of the lot width requirement in
the "R -C" District from 80 feet to 40 feet and allows for administrative approval of
a subdivision to create a separate lot for the Assisted Living property as shown on
Exhibit B.
4. Approval of the Final PUD is contingent upon termination of the drive thru bank
lease, once the current term expires, and removal of the drive thru building.
5. Evidence of Watershed District approval shall be submitted prior to issuance of
erosion control and building permits; the project shall comply with other City,
State, and Federal agency requirements as applicable.
6. Final Utility Plans and evidence of property owner consent to sanitary sewer
connections shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance
of utility and building permits.
7. Samples of final building materials and colors and potential minor changes to the
exhibits, as needed, shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community
Development prior to issuance of building permits. Use of vinyl siding is expressly
prohibited.
8. A development agreement between the applicant and EDA shall be executed prior
to issuance of building permits.
9. Irrigation and Site Lighting Plans (including photometric) shall be approved by the
Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of building permits.
10. Sprinkler and Fire Alarm Plans shall be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to
issuance of building permits.
11. Joint parking and access agreements between the office/bank property, Assisted
Living property, and Parkshore Place apartment property, in a form acceptable to
the City Attorney, shall be executed prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit for
the Assisted Living facility.
12. All improvements shall be completed in a manner acceptable to the City prior to
issuance of an Occupancy Permit, except that a temporary Occupancy Permit may
be issued prior to completion of landscaping improvements provided a letter of
credit in an amount equal to 125% of the cost of said improvements is submitted in
a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
Adopted by the City Council December 2, 1996
yor
ATTEST:
Reviewed by administration:
9047:RES 10
- '
CITY OF
ST LOUIS
PARK 6/71252
STATE OF, MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )ss
CITY OF ST: LOUIS PARK)
"CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION"
The undersigned hereby certifies the following:
1) The attached is a full, true,and correct
copy of the original, Resolution No. 96-189 ,
,,- adopted 12/2/96
Office bf the City Clerk.
2) The CitCouncil meeting was held -upon due
, and on file in:* the
call and notice.
WITNESS mytand and the Seal of the City of St. Louis
Park.
Lows
4ori,4
k SEAL1./
-4Nsa66
(SEAL)
lane -L. Pet rs, MCMC
DeputyCity Clerk
12/3/96
Date
TRANSFER ENTERED
HENNEPIN COUNTY TAXPAYER SERVICES
AUG 8 MT ,
f
5005 Minnetonka pOulevard St. LouisPark, Minnesota 55416'i20-
-Phone: 612,924-2500Faiv.611-924-2170 '
Printed on recycled and recylable paper
RESOLUTION NO. 96-189
A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION 96-152 APPROVED ON OCTOBER 7,
1996 APPROVING A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER
SECTION 14:6-7 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO
ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED COMMERCIAL AND HIGH-DENSITY
MULTIPLE -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOCATED AT
3601 PARK CENTER BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, The City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-113 approving the Preliminary
PUD on August 5, 1996 and
WHEREAS, a complete application for a Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) was
received on August 23, 1996 , and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission reviewed the Final PUD at its meeting meeting of
September 18, 1996, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final PUD subject
to the 9 conditions in the staff report on a 4-1 vote with four members present voting in the
affirmative and one member voting against, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission
minutes and testimony of those appearing at the meeting or otherwise including comments in the
record of decision.
WHEREAS, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 96-152 approving the Final PUD
on October 7, 1996, and
WHEREAS, the legal description and address in Resolution No. 96-15 have been found to
be incorrect and are hereby corrected by approval of a new resolution on December 2, 1996.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park:
Findings
1. G & P Properties, Inc. and Stewardship Properties III made application to the City Council for
a Final Planned Unit Development under Section 14:6-7 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code
within the district located at 3601 Park Center Boulevard for the legal description as follows, to -
wit:
0
Lot 1, Block 2, Park Center, St. Louis Park, Minnesota
2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission
(Case No: 96-16-PUD) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety and welfare of
the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on
values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and
compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance.
3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or
general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it cause
serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property
values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general
purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested
modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7 2(E).
4. The contents of Planning Case File .96 -16 -PUD are hereby entered' into and. made part of the
'public hearing record and the record of decision for this case.
Conclusion
The Final Planned Unit Development at the location described is approved based on the findings
set forth above and subject to the following conditions:
A. The site shall be developed, used and maintained in accordance with Exhibit A.
Demolition Plan, Exhibit B: Site Plan, Exhibit C: Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control
Plan, Exhibit D: Landscape Plan, Exhibits E and F: Elevations, Exhibit G. Fence,
Enclosure Designs, and the following conditions:
1. Approval of the Final PUD does not grant any concept approval for future phases
of development involving the property
2. Approval of the Final PUD is contingent upon City Council approval of an
amendment to the Continued Special Permit for the Parkshore Place apartment
property to address associated improvements involving that property; approval of
the Final PUD is further contingent upon adherence by the applicant to any
conditions of such Special Permit approval. _ _ __
3. Approval of the Final PUD includes modification of the lot width requirement in
the "R -C" District from 80 feet to 40 feet and allows for administrative approval of
a subdivision to create a separate lot for the Assisted Living property as shown on
Exhibit B.
4. Approval of the Final PUD is contingent upon termination of the drive thru bank
lease, once the current term expires, and removal of the drive thru building.
5. Evidence of Watershed District approval shall be submitted prior to issuance of
erosion control and building permits; the project shall comply with other City,
State, and Federal agency requirements as applicable.
6. - Final Utility Plans and evidence of property owner consent to sanitary sewer
cgnnections shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance
of utility said building permits. _
7. Samples of final building materials and colors and potential minor changes- to the
exhibits, as needed, shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community
Development prior to issuance of building permits. Use of vinyl siding is expressly
prohibited.
8. A development agreement between the applicant and EDA shall be executed prior
to issuance of building permits.
9. Irrigation and Site Lighting Plans (including photometric) shall be approved by the
Zoning Administrator prior to issuance of building permits.
10. Sprinkler and Fire Alarm Plans shall be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to
issuance of building permits.
11. - Joint parking, and access agreements between the office/bank property, Assisted
Living property, and Parkshore Place apartment property, in a form acceptable to
the City Attorney, shall be executed prior to issuance of an Occupancy Permit for
the Assisted Living facility.
12. All improvements shall be completed in a manner acceptable to the City prior to
t.u' ;
µ r - issuance of an Occupancy Permit, except that a temporary Occupancy Permit may
6 r e . be issued prior to completion of landscaping improvements provided a letter of
9 credit in an amount equal to 125% of the cost of said improvements is submitted in
71 a form acceptable to the City Attorney.
4i „�rty .7'4-1
ATTEST:
lf%
4'
Reviewed by administration:
9047:RES 10
Adopted by the City Council December 2,-1996
/L`
Mayor
7ZT&JIN
ITS
ON
ProfesCal AMPBELL
cti/ p17 80 Eayg l O face Center
13 Ea Center Curve
Eagan, Corporate1211
6771252
;, 13 LlG971 G 13 C6i 71 52
13NIIG971O 13 C6771252
1 3AUG9 i' 1 Ct -13 C671252
SCO 14 5n
SEP $5 00
00C Tic 00
crri�r. OF
F
-_�:i rr� �?�. (.
97 AUG 1 Ail IG: 1 2