Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-161 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1996/10/221 1 RESOLUTION 96-161 Resolution Establishing City Contribution Toward Employee Cafeteria Benefits Plan For Non -Union, Supervisory, amd Non -Supervisory Employees For 1997 and Amending Resolution 95-170 WHEREAS, the City Council believes that a cafeteria -style employee group benefit plan provides the most effective means for providing employee group benefits, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish different City contribution levels based on individual employee selection of single or family health coverage, and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish and maintain a greater City contribution for employees in the supervisory/administrative classification levels, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park: 1) The City Manager shall establish and administer a cafeteria -styled employee group benefits program for 1997. 2) The monthly contribution of benefit dollars for non-union/non-supervisory employees, working at least 30 hours per week, shall be $310.00. Employees selecting family health coverage shall receive an additional $50.00 per month. 3) The monthly contribution of benefit dollars for non-union/non-supervisory employees working between 20 and 29 hours per week shall be $160.00 for single health coverage and $295.00 for family health coverage. 4) The monthly City contribution of benefit dollars for supervisory/administrative employees shall be $400.00. Supervisory/administrative employees selecting family coverage shall receive an additional $55.00 per month. Additionally, the City shall provide at no cost to such employees term life insurance at one and one-half times the annual salary. 5) The appropriate City officials are hereby authorized and directed to deduct the balance of any sum premium from the compensation of an employee or officer and remit the insurer under an approved contract the employee or officer and share of any such premium. Adopted by the City Council October 22, 1996 A Mayor Attest Reviewed for Administration I de)--' v City Clerk / City Manager