Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout96-137 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1996/09/03RESOLUTION NO. 96-137 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION 14:6-7 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED I -P INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT LOCATED AT 2300 AND 2400 EDGEWOOD AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) was received from the applicant, and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on the Preliminary and Final PUD was mailed to all owners of property within 350 feet of the subject property plus other affected property owners in the vicinity and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the Preliminary and Final PUD was published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on August 7, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and reviewed the Preliminary and Final PUD at the meeting of August 21, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final PUD on a 4-0 vote with all members present voting in the affirmative, and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments in the record of decision. Park: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Findings. 1. Quest Properties, Inc. has made application to the City Council for a Planned Unit Development under Section 14:6-7 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the district located at 2300 and 2400 Edgewood Avenue for the legal description as follows, to -wit: See Attachment A - Legal Description 2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No. 96 -21 -PUD ) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on -r 6.5--,7c-z_ 4 C,'/ �� values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7.2(E). 4. The contents of Planning Case File 96 -21 -PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Conclusion The Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development at the location described is approved based on the findings set forth above and in accordance with the Approved Final PIan Exhibits Al - Site Plan, A-2 - Landscape Plan, A-3 - Floor Plan and A4 - Elevations which are incorporated herein and subject to the following revisions and conditions: 1. Revision of the Elevations exhibit to replace painted, scored concrete block with rock face or exposed aggregate (burnished) block on the south building facade, except as used for an accent band; 2. Revision of the Landscape Plan exhibit to include 8 additional evergreen trees to be planted at a minimum height of 6 feet in locations approved by the Planning Coordinator to meet tree replacement requirements; 3. Compliance with Building Code and Fire Marshal criteria; 4. Compliance with other City, Watershed District, MPCA and other applicable state/federal agency requirements; 5. Execution of cross easements between the two properties; 6. Approval of an Irrigation PIan and Lighting Plan by the Zoning Administrator is required prior to building permit issuance; 7. The width of the drive on the south side of the new building (2400 Edgewood) shall be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits; 8 Detailed Stormwater Plans shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of Erosion Control Permits and commencement of any grading activities; 9. All new utility lines shall be placed underground; 10. The applicant shall provide the City with documentation regarding the underground storage tank (MPCA correspondence would satisfy this requirement). 11. The applicant shall acknowledge in writing to the City that they have contacted the general contractor and informed them of the requirements for removal of the hazardous and special wastes from the building. 12. The applicant shall complete all improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new building; a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued prior to completion of all landscaping improvements if a Letter of Credit in the amount of 125% of the remaining improvements is submitted in a form acceptable by the City Attorney. Adopted by the City Council September 3, 1996 Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Reviewed by administration: 96.21PUD:RES10 ATTACHMENT A - LEGAL DESCRIPTION 1 Lot 1, Block 2, Eliot View 3rd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. Subject to utility easement as shown on plat; and All that part of the East One-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 117, Range 21. described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of a line drawn parallelwith and 30 feet west of the west line of the East One-eighth of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 and the Northerly right of way line of the Great Northern Railway; thence north along said described parallel line 160 feet; thence west at right angles 270 feet; thence south parallel to above described parallel line to the northerly right of way line of said railroad; thence northeasterly along said right of way line to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens) I 1 1 1 I y i CASE NO. 96='21 -PUO 2815 C OPY COPY REGISTERED VOL)q 7 PAGE 5%(:" REGISTERED VOL bL .PAG DoE IIFICE OF THE REGISTSAR OF TITLES I'FIENNEPdN COUNTY. MINNESOTA CEK f IFIED FILED ON JUN 4 1997 REGISTRAR OF TITLES DEPUTJI RESOLUTION NO. 96-137 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) UNDER SECTION 14:6-7 OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING FOR PROPERTY ZONED I -P INDUSTRIAL PARK DISTRICT LOCATED AT 2300 AND 2400 EDGEWOOD AVENUE SOUTH WHEREAS, an application for approval of a Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) was received from the applicant, and WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on the Preliminary and Final PUD was mailed to all owners of property within 350 feet of the subject property plus other affected property owners in the vicinity and WHEREAS, notice of public hearing on the Preliminary and Final PUD was published in the St. Louis Park Sailor on August 7, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and reviewed the Preliminary and Final PUD at the meeting of August 21, 1996, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary and Final PUD on a 4-0 vote with all members present voting in the affirmative, and WHEREAS, the City Council has considered the staff reports, Planning Commission minutes and testimony of those appearing at the public hearing or otherwise including comments in the record of decision. Park: NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of the City of St. Louis Findings 1. Quest Properties, Inc. has made application to the City Council for a Planned Unit Development under Section 14.6-7 of the St. Louis Park Ordinance Code within the district located at 2300 and 2400 Edgewood Avenue for the legal description as follows, to -wit: See Attachment A - Legal Description 2. The City Council has considered the advice and recommendation of the Planning Commission (Case No 96 -21 -PUD ) and the effect of the proposed PUD on the health, safety and welfare of the occupants of the surrounding lands, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, the effect on values of properties in the surrounding area, the effect of the use on the Comprehensive Plan, and compliance with the intent of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The City Council has determined that the PUD will not be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community nor with certain contemplated traffic improvements will it cause serious traffic congestion nor hazards, nor will it seriously depreciate surrounding property values. The Council has also determined that the proposed PUD is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan and that the requested modifications comply with the requirements of Section 14:6-7.2(E). 4. The contents of Planning Case File 96 -21 -PUD are hereby entered into and made part of the public hearing record and the record of decision for this case. Conclusion The Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development at the location described is approved based on the findings set forth above and in accordance with the Approved Final Plan Exhibits Al - Site Plan, A-2 - Landscape Plan, A-3 - Floor Plan and A4 - Elevations which are incorporated herein and subject to the following revisions and conditions: 1. Revision of the Elevations exhibit to replace painted, scored concrete block with rock face or exposed aggregate (burnished) block on the south building facade, except as used for an accent band; 2. Revision of the Landscape Plan exhibit to include 8 additional evergreen trees to be planted at a minimum height of 6 feet in locations approved by the Planning Coordinator to meet tree replacement requirements; 3. Compliance with Building Code and Fire Marshal criteria; 4. Compliance with other City, Watershed District, MPCA and other applicable state/federal agency requirements; 5 Execution of cross easements between the two properties; 6. Approval of an Irrigation Plan and Lighting Plan by the Zoning Administrator is required prior to building permit issuance; 7 The width of the drive on the south side of the new building (2400 Edgewood) shall be approved by the Fire Marshal prior to issuance of building permits; II 8. Detailed Stormwater Plans shall be submitted for approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of Erosion Control Permits and commencement of any grading activities; 9. All new utility lines shall be placed underground; 10 The applicant shall provide the City with documentation regarding the underground storage tank (MPCA correspondence would satisfy this requirement). 11. The applicant shall acknowledge in writing to the City that they have contacted the general contractor and informed them of the requirements for removal of the hazardous and special wastes from the building. 12. The applicant shall complete all improvements prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the new building; a temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued prior to completion of all landscaping improvements if a Letter of Credit in the amount of 125% of the remaining improvements is submitted in a form acceptable by the City Attorney. Adopted by the i / Council September 3, 1996e(it9 WAA/ ATTEST. Reviewed by administration: 96-21PUD RESIO Mayor ATTACHMENT A - LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot 1, Block 2, Eliot View 3rd Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for said County. Subject to utility easement as shown on plat; and All that part of the East One-half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 8, Township 117, Range 21, described as follows: Commencing at the intersection of a line drawn parallel with and 30 feet west of the west line of the East One-eighth of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 8 and the Northerly right of way line of the Great Northern Railway; thence north along said described parallel line 160 feet; thence west at right angles 270 feet; thence south parallel to above described parallel line to the northerly right of way line of said railroad; thence northeasterly along said right of way line to the point of beginning, all according to the U.S. Government Survey thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota. (Torrens) CASE NO. 96 -21 -PUD CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )ss CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK) "CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION" The undersigned, hereby certifies the following: 1) The attached is a full, true and correct copy of the original Resolution No. 96-137 , adopted 9/3/96 , and on file in the Office of the City Clerk. 2) The City Council meeting was held upon due call and notice. WITNESS my hand and the Seal of the City of St. Louis Park. (SEAL) Diane L. Peters, MCMC Deputy City Clerk 11/19/96 Date 5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416-2290 Phone: 612-924-2500 Fax: 612-924-2170 Punted on recycled and recylable paper