HomeMy WebLinkAbout95-135 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1995/10/02RESOLUTION NO. 95-135
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 14:6-6.2(F)(2) OF
THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT VINYL LAP
SIDING AS AN EXTERIOR MATERIAL INSTEAD OF AN APPROVED CLASS I
MATERIAL FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-4 MULTIPLE FAMILY
DISTRICT AT 2925 MONTEREY AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Monterey co -Housing has applied for a variance from Section 14:6-6.2(F)(2) of the
Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit vinyl lap siding as an exterior material
instead of an approved class I material for property located in the R-4 Multiple Family
District at the following location, to -wit:
Legal: See attached Exhibit "A" "Torrens"
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals held a public hearing, received testimony from the
public, discussed the application for a variance Case No. 13-95 VAR and, upon finding
that the request did not satisfy the Ordinance necessary for granting a variance,
approved Resolution of Denial 13-95 on a vote of 5-0.
3. On September 5, 1995, the applicant, Monterey Co -Housing, filed an appeal of this
decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals.
4. On Monday September 18, 1995, the City Council considered the appeal of Monterey
Co -Housing from the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals.
5. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety,
and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air,
danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on the values of the property in the
surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive
Plan.
6. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase
the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public
safety, unreasonably diminish or impair the health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any
other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
plan.
7. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or
structures in the district in which such land is located.
8. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to
the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
9. The contents of Planing Case File 13-95 VAR are hereby entered into and made part of
the public record and the record of decision for this case.
14.
A 9..S/3.1 --
Conclusion,
The applicant for a variance to permit vinyl lap siding as an exterior material instead of an
approved class I material is granted based upon the findings setforth above, with the
understanding that this approval is good for one calendar year from this date.
ATTEST:
Citylicitik 444-47‘44#4-1
Reviewed by administration:
RES VAR. CC APP
Adopted by the City Council October 2, 1995
6u /4„4.)
Approved as to form and execution:
Ataidia.‘44 L
City Attorney
ti
RESOLUTION NO.95-135
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE FROM SECTION 14:6-6.2(F)(2) OF
THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING 'TO ZONING TO PERMIT- VINYL ' LAP
SIDING AS_ AN EXTERIOR MATERIAL INSTEAD OF AN APPROVED CtASSII
MATERIAL FOR PROPERTY 'LOCATED IN THE R-4 MULTIPLE -FAMILY
DISTRICT AT 2925 MONTEREY AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Monterey co -Housing has applied for a'variance from Section 14:6-6.2(F)(2) of the
Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit vinyl lap siding as an exterior material
instead of an approved class I material for property located in the R-4 Multiple Family
District at the following location, to -wit:
Legal: See attached Exhibit "A" "Torrens"
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals held a public hearing, received testimony from the
public, discussed the application for a variance Case No. 13-95 VAR and, upon, finding
that the request did not satisfy the Ordinance necessary for granting a variance,
approved Resolution of Denial 13-95 on a vote of 5-0.
3. On September 5, 1995, the applicant, Monterey Co -Housing, filed an appeal of this
decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals.
4. On Monday- September.18, -1995, - the -City Council considered the appeal of Monterey
Co -Housing from the decision of the Board of Zoning Appeals.
5. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the health, safety,
and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions, light and air,
danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on the values of the property in the
surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive
Plan.
6. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property, it is
possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will not
impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably increase
the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public
safety, unreasonably diminish or impair the health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any
other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
plan.
7. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are peculiar to such
property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally to other land or
structures in the district in which such land is located.
8. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a
substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience to
the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
9. The contents of Planing Case File 13-95 VAR are hereby entered into and made part of
the public record and the record of decision for this case.
•
J
"EXHIBIT A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Lot 22, Block 1, except the North 35.00 feet of that part of Lot 22 lying Westerly of the
Southerly extension of the East line of Lot 20, Block 1 and also except the South 192.47 feet
of the North 227.47 feet of the most Westerly 35.00 feet of Lot 22, Block 1, Monterey Park,
according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles in and
for said County.
"S45270
,REGIS RED VOI p 6
g3
244 270
,copy
OFFICE OF NEEGISTRAR
HENNEPIN COUNTY. miNNES011%
CERTIFIED FILED ON
OCT 19 190 fir-,
OF TITLES
DEPUTY
BY
64
ge, is .i
HC 1030 (5190)
;TATE of MINNESOTA,
:OUNTY of HENNEPIN.
his Is to certify that
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
Transfer from No. 775972
A. D. 1946 Volume 338
No.
ti
788
DISTRICT COURT No (s)
Originally regi
Page 104416
83
6818
tered the 25th day of June '
REGISTRATION
Monterey CoHousing Community, a Minnesota
_County of Hennepin, State of Minnesota
cooperativ
2925 Monterey Avenue South, City of St. Louis Park,
is now the owner(s) of an estate In fee simple of and in the following described land situated In the County of Hennepin and
tate of Minnesota, to wit:
Lot 22, Block 1, except the North 35.00 feet of that part of Lot
East line of Lot 20, Block 1 and
also except the South 192.47 feet of the North
227.47 feet
,
1
Block 1, Monterey Park, according to the plat tto�r reF
fit to
.1�1 l�
said
County.
Subject to drainage and utility
Subject to a reservation by the
.a
easements as showd pla4,
State of Minnesota of mineral and
2 lying Westerly of the Southerly, extension of the
D‘ullr
,t6feet of Lot 22;
11
�din the office of the Registrar of Titles in and for
iLlk kit
IA1.1 C:::1
mineral rights therein;
Subject to i`mbrnces, liens and Interest(s) noted by the nilliI(s)-u derwritten or endorsed hereon; and eutelehe
lowing fights or encumbrances subsisting, as provided in the twentv-fourth sect) n of "An net conrerninn the of !nova
CITY OF
fISATR.
K LOUIS
TORRENS to Registrar of Titles
1 1ABSTRACT to County Recorder
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss
CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK)
The undersigned duly qualified and acting Clerk
of the City of St. Louis Park hereby certifies the
following:
The attached is a true and correct
copy of the original Resolution No.
approving a fel.0414...C,
and on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
Beverly Lanagan, Ci, Clerk
(date)
(S E A L)
5005 Minnetonka Boulevard St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416-2290
Phone 612-924-2500 Fax 612-924-2170
Printed on recycled paper