HomeMy WebLinkAbout94-21 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1994/02/22RES 94-21
RESOLUTION CONCERNING THE NEED FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF A DEER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
FOR WESTWOOD HILLS ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION CENTER AND
SURROUNDING AREA
WHEREAS, the City of St. Louis Park (City) received notice on February 7, 1994
that a petition had been filed with the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board (EQB)
requesting that the City be required to prepare an Environmental Assessment Worksheet
(EAW)' prior to carrying out any aspect of its adopting any St. Louis Park City Council
Proposalin which trained sharpshooters will significantly reduce the size of the deer herd
[in] St. Louis Park Nature Center;" which petition, dated February 7, 1994, was received by
the City on February 14, 1993 (Attachment A);
WHEREAS, the EQB determined that the City is the appropriate responsible
governmental unit (RGU) to decide the need for an EAW, by letter dated February 10, 1994
(Attachment B);
WHEREAS, the procedures to be followed in making the determination of whether an
EAW is needed are set forth in Rules Part 4410.1100;
WHEREAS, these rules provide that the RGU shall order the preparation of an EAW
"if the evidence presented by the petitioners, proposers, and other persons or otherwise known
to the RGU demonstrates that, because of the nature or location of the proposed project, the
project may have the potential for significant environmental effects," (Minnesota Rules Part
4410.1100, Subpart 6); and
WHEREAS, the City is charged with protection of the health, welfare and safety of its
citizens, including assisting these citizens in the protection and preservation of their property
and managing the wildlife population within the City in a safe and humane manner;
WHEREAS, the Westwood Hills Environmental Education Center (Center) was
founded in 1976 to provide maximum opportunity to enjoy and study this site with a
minimum amount of disruption while preserving the character of the site's habitats and their
associated flora and fauna;
WHEREAS, the City in carrying out its responsibilities and in responding to citizen
complaints and concerns has studied the issues surrounding the deer population in and around
the Center through a task force composed of community members since July, 1993, and City
staff prepared a report of the task forces' deliberations, findings and resulting staff
recommendations dated February 7, 1994 (Attachment C); and
299/22036488 2/17/94
WHEREAS, the Center is located in Section 6, Township 117 North, Range 21 West
in Hennepin County Minnesota, the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park hereby makes
the following:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The petition filed on February 7,1994 with the EQB (Attachment A), the letter from
the EQB to the City dated February 10, 1994 (Attachment B), the Final Staff Report and
Recommendations for a Deer Management Program in St. Louis Park, dated February 7,
1994, ( "Final Deer Report") (Attachment C), are all incorporated herein as part of the record
of decision in response to the petition requesting the preparation of an EAW for the bait and
sharpshoot proposal for deer management at the Center. In addition, comments received from
various members of the community at public hearings held since July, 1993, including City
Council meetings on November 1, 1993 and December 6, 1993, a Public Forum held on
November 29, 1993, and in task force and other informal meetings and discussions since July,
1993, have been considered in responding to the petition and are incorporated by reference
herein. These comments include those provided by representatives of Friends of Animals and
Their Environment (F.A.T.E.), the Humane Society, City staff, City residents, including those
in favor and those against deer management program, and representatives of the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources staff (DNR). In addition, the City has reviewed the deer
management plans and experiences of surrounding communities, including those listed on
page 17 of the Final Deer Report, and other literature relevant to deer management issues,
including the references listed on page 18 of the Final Deer Report. All of these sources of
information are incorporated herein as part of the record for the City's decision on the EAW
petition.
2. In accordance with the EQB's February 10, 1994 letter, and Minnesota Rules Part
4410.3100, the City did not make a final decision regarding a deer management plan for the
Center, pending review of the petition and the need for an EAW.
3. The proposed action of the City sought to be reviewed by an EAW, according to the
petition, is the recommended population reduction activity described in the Final Deer Report
as a bait and sharpshoot option. The petition does not challenge other aspects of the Final
Deer Report. The petition asserts that the bait and sharpshoot activity "[b]y [its] very nature .
.. and by its very definition, ... will have a significant material effect on the wildlife, the
environment and ecosystem in the nature center and it's surrounding area." The petition
does not contain any evidence in support of this assertion, nor does the petition reference any
previous evidence submitted as part of the task force proceedings, or otherwise, in support of
this assertion. The petition also does not challenge the Final Deer Report's comments,
findings or recommendations. In reviewing the petition's request and the need for an EAW,
the City has reviewed the evidence in the record referenced in paragraph (1) above.
299/22036488 2/17/94
r
1
4. Based on this record the City finds that:
(a) The desired deer density established by DNR guidelines of 15-25 deer per square
mile (or 640 acres), is greatly exceeded by the current population of deer in and around the
Center, based on recent aerial surveys. In particular, approximately 51 deer exist in the area
according to these surveys. Since the Center's suitable deer habitat is approximately 1/7
square mile or 90 acres, the current deer population is excessive and is not consistent with
DNR guidelines.
(b) This deer overpopulation also is inconsistent with the objective of the Center
which is to "provide maximum opportunity to enjoy and study this site with a minimum
amount of disruption while preserving the character of the site's habitats and their associated
flora and fauna." These objectives are impaired by the overpopulation of deer because of the
effects on the other indigenous flora and animal populations of' the Center as described on
page 4 of the Final Deer Report. While deer population within the Center is an important
objective of the Center, it is not an exclusive objective. For the overall objectives of the
Center to be met, the deer population must be reduced and controlled so that other important
aspects of the Center can be preserved and enjoyed by all of the community.
(c) The overpopulation of deer in and around the Center is causing a threat to the
public health, safety and welfare due to residents' loss of shrubbery and other property
damage caused by straying deer looking for food, the increased potential for car/deer
accidents, and the increased potential for contact with deer ticks that could result in
contracting Lyme's disease. Reduction of the deer population to acceptable levels is
necessary as a step to prevent and mitigate these threats.
(d) Humane management of the deer population in and around the Center is desired
by residents, interest groups, the City and the DNR. Of the many options for deer
management and in particular deer reduction for the area in and around the Center, the most
humane is the bait and sharpshoot option. Other options were explored, such as trap and
relocate, but the City was unable to obtain DNR's permission to implement such an option,
and it is less humane since the mortality rate is 85% after 4-15 months.
(e) St. Louis Park's proposed Deer Management Program, as expressed on pages 14-
15 of the Final Deer Report, is intended to provide for the health, safety and welfare of its
residents and park users and to protect and preserve the Westwood Hills Environmental
Education Center in accordance with its original intent and mission. It is further intended to
assist area residents in the protection and preservation of their property and to control and
manage the community's deer population in the safest and most humane way.
29922036488 2/17/94
(f) The City of St. Louis Park and the task force participants have thoroughly
evaluated a wide variety of alternatives to the proposed Deer Management Program and have
studied the potential impacts of those alternatives.
5. The City finds that the petition, while vague, seeks to review through an EAW the
deer population reduction method of bait and sharpshoot. The petition does not provide a
detailed description of the potential environmental effects that may result from the proposed
activity, or an explanation of why the potential effects are significant. The petition appears to
assert potential significant environmental effects because implementation of the bait and
sharpshoot method, if approved by the City, will by its very nature result in a large reduction
of the deer population in the Center, and by definition this will affect the non -deer aspects of
the Center, such as regeneration of foliage concluded in the Final Deer Report to have been
severely damaged or destroyed by the current deer population.
6. In accordance with the EQB's February 10, 1994 letter and Minnesota Rules Part
4410.1000, the City has reviewed the Mandatory EAW categories contained in Part
4410.4300, the Mandatory EIS categories contained in Part 4410.4400, and the Exemption
categories contained in Part 4410.4600 of the Minnesota Rules. The bait and sharpshoot
activity proposed to be reviewed in the petition is not a Mandatory EAW category. In
particular, the City has reviewed Minnesota Rules Part 4410.4300, subp. 30, "Natural Areas,"
and finds that this category does not apply because the deer bait and sharpshoot activity will
not result in a permanent physical encroachment in the Center, and further finds that even if
the activity were a permanent physical encroachment, the activity would not be inconsistent
with, but rather in accordance with, the management plan for the Center and with DNR
guidelines for deer population as indicated at page 3 of the Final Deer Report. The City also
finds the bait and sharpshoot activity is not a Mandatory EIS category and is not an Exempt
category.
7. The City has reviewed the evidence in the record and, based on this record, the
findings in the record, and the findings of fact stated above, further finds that the bait and
sharpshoot activity proposed for the deer overpopulation in and around the Center does not
present the potential for significant environmental effects. The effects of carrying out the
proposed bait and sharpshoot activity in and around the Center are not significant because
the deer population is not a unique, rare, or endangered natural resource, or one with
historical significance; the deer are easily replaceable through natural reproduction (it is the
ease of deer reproduction that has in part led to overpopulation); the consequences to other
wildlife and indigenous resources in and around the Center will be positive, not adverse; and
the reduction of the deer population to acceptable DNR levels will greatly benefit the
remaining deer although a large number of deer will need to be humanely eliminated to
achieve this acceptable level.
299/22036488 2/17/94
1
4
1
r
1
449&1
8. Minnesota Rules Part 4410.1100 Subpart 6 requires that the responsible governmental
unit, in this case the City of St. Louis Park, shall deny a petition for an EAW if the evidence
presented in the record fails to demonstrate that the challenged project may have the potential
for significant environmental effects.
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park
hereby finds that implementation of the proposed Deer Management Program contained in the
Final Deer Report will not result in any significant environmental effects and that the
evidence presented by petitioners and the evidence in the record fails to demonstrate that the
proposed project may have the potential for significant environmental effects, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of St. Louis Park
hereby determines that an Environmental Assessment Worksheet is not required and will not
be prepared for the City's Deer Management Program for the Westwood Hills Environmental
Education Center and orders that the petition for an EAW for the proposed project be
dismissed.
Adopted by the City Council February 22, 1994
Reviewed for administration:
299/22036488 2/17/94
Approved as to form and execution:
jae4dik At th
City/Attorney