HomeMy WebLinkAbout89-02 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1989/01/031
1
1
RESOLUTION NO. 89-02
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM
SECTION 14-173(6) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING
TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN ADDITION HAVING A FRONT YARD
SETBACK OF 0 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 20 FEET IN THE I-
1, INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AT 2240 FLORIDA AVENUE SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Thomas Perbix and Associates has applied for a variance from Section 14-
173(6) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit the constructin of an addition
having a front yard setback of 0 feet instead of the required 20 feet for an office
building located in the I-1, Industrial District at the following location, to -wit:
Lot 3, Block 1, Eliot View 4th Addition (Torrens)
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 88 -99 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that the application
be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values of property
in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property,
it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will
not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably
increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the
public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any
other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive
Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are
peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally
to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience
to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
7. The following conditions and safeguards are necessary in order to insure and
will in fact insure that there will be no unreasonably adverse consequences to the
granting of the variance:
a. The addition shall be constructed in conformance with Exhibit A, Proposed
Addi tion.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for front yard setback of 0 feet is granted based upon
the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council January 3, 1989
w /4,44/�
Mayo
ATTEST:
a 4, z . . . r . ..i
Ci y er'%
Reviewed by administration:
/446)60-v
City Manager
Approved as to form and execution:
City A morn ey
r
1
/ OM•
/ / / / / /4.0/ / / /
•
r!'w• ;ri�rr6�. .•j•• 125 'r.,..�,.*:: •"•_•.• .....`.l •••!tr •••••••.:,..•r:�•1 y
w • �* N , N+r ^r•}'+Y� • ' Yom•••
�+J!
„.805•
. r.. • jTiNtifd b• f::.:l�'i' %' %.::ke •••-.1......-••: r, n -
p •"
••
• •••f.}'r .0g). :(0.074
•••'m4/r shrtmS ?C•r•Os ..-..,".i:▪ '• t••.C,: •l
• • ��'.424:•Mx .
�.;..
,� 'Z' ' ,:i..:
VV�V•;, ..�'�"•:'.
.. .
•
•
'1•••••• :. •7 .. ^FT��•�;:• aril: :K:r`: "ti.
I
ISS
\ Z0.0
\•.
I e•/o,,u
\ , % CONCRETE ' \\
--• ,' \ \\ BLOCK \ \\ `,\
\ \ 8U/LD/N6
\ \ \` \
\
•i •'' \ \\\ \\\\ \
:r 1:••:; \BviId!nc) Area 1oi 860 {+'\
'tea' •••• .t' ,•••,'•' ••.
•
• nous
Noe
tt:
:r
.4
1•
•1
i.: - .• •.
•
•
•
_z3
4,,,_..r1,,,.. a4r, i,.....„.,............„...„. r a ,
t'• '1
. , 1p. ;I
•• ,.X ((.i1D,r",)
• „ y �• •
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSED ADDITION
\ Q N;uwl
CASE -1407 -88=13 -6: -VAR