HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-197 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1984/11/19November 19, 1984
8e
RESOLUTION NO. 84-197
A RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF FULL
GOSPEL TEMPLE FOR A VARIANCE UNDER SECTION 14-133(5) OF THE
ST. LOUIS PARK ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT
A SIGN WITH A FRONT YARD SETBACK OF TWO FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED THIRTY FEET FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN THE R-2, SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT, AT 5450 WEST 41ST STREET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK:
Findings
1. On September 18, 1984 Full Gospel Temple filed an application seeking a variance
to permit a sign with a front yard setback of two feet instead of the required
thirty feet for property located in the R-2, Single Family Residence District,
at 5450 West 41st Street for the legal description as follows, to -wit:
Lots 29, 30, 31 and that part of Lot 32 lying south of north 15.07
feet thereof, except highway, Block 3, "Browndale Addition:
(Abstract)
2. On October 2, 1984, the Board of Zoning Appeals met and, acting as a committee,
recommended denial of the variance on a vote of 2-0.
3. On November 5, 1984, the City Council held a public hearing, received testimony
from the public, discussed the application, and moved to deny the request on a 4-
2-1 vote.
4. Based on the testimony, evidence presented, and files and records, the City
Council makes the following findings:
a. The requested variance does not meet requirements of Section 14-219 and
Section 14-220.1 of the Zoning Ordinance necessary to be met for the City
Council to grant a variance.
b. Granting of the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right.
c. Granting of the requested variance would be contrary to the intent and
provision of the Zoning Ordinance.
d. There is no demonstrable or undue hardship under the terms of the Zoning
Ordinance or Minnesota Statute and therefore conditions necessary for
granting the requested variance do not exist.
e. The strict application of the terms of the City Zoning Ordinance to the
subject property does not prevent the owner and/or applicant in using the
property in a manner legally permissible within the R-2, Single Family
Residence District.
Conclusion
- r
The application for the variance is denied based upon the findings set forth above
and on the grounds that conditions required for approval do not exist.
Adopted by the City Council November 19, 1984
U�
yor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed by administration Approved as to form and legality:
ity Manager Cit Attorney