HomeMy WebLinkAbout84-07 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1984/01/09RESOLUTION N0. 84-07
A RESOLUTION OF FINDINGS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF RICHARD R.
EINCK FOR A VARIANCE UNDER SECTION 14-173(6) OF THE ST. LOUIS PARK
ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT A LANDSCAPED FRONT YARD
SETBACK OF ZERO FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 20 FEET FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED IN THE I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT, AT 6530 CAMBRIDGE STREET.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF ST. LOUIS PARK:
Findings
1. On October 21, 1983, Richard R. Einck filed an application seeking a variance
to permit a landscaped front yard setback of zero feet instead of the required
20 feet for property located in the I-1, Industrial District, at 6530 Cambridge
Street for the legal description as follows, to -wit:
Tract A and Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 0798
Hennepin County, Minnesota (Torrens)
2. On October 27, 1983, the Board Of Zoning Appeals met and recommended denial
of the variance on a 4-0 vote.
3. On November 21, 1983, the City Council held a public hearing, received testimony
from the public, discussed the application, and moved to defer the matter to
the December 19, 1983 meeting.
4. On December 19,1983, the City Council reopened the public hearing and received
additional testimony.
5. Based on the testimony, evidence presented, and files and records, the City
Council makes the following findings:
a. The requested variance does not meet requirements of Section 14-219
and Section 14-220.1 of the Zoning Ordinance necessary to be met for
the City Council to grant a variance.
b. Granting of the requested variance is not necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right.
C. Granting of the requested variance would be contrary to the intent and
provisions of the Zoning Ordinance.
d. There is no demonstrable or undue hardhsip under the terms of the
Zoning Ordinance or Minnesota Statute and therefore conditions
necessary for granting the requested variance do not exist.
e. The strict application of the terms of the City Zoning Ordinance to
the subject property does not prevent the owner and/or applicant in
using the property in a manner legally permissible within the I-1
Industrial District.
rnmrl IICTnN
The application for the variance is denied based upon the findings set forth above
and on the grounds that conditions required for approval do not exist.
ATTEST:
-ity Clerk
Reviewed by administration:
— WIPF M�
W01 ty Manager OF
Adopted by the City Council January 9, 1984
,U gl, 14j"l
Wyor
Approved as to form and legality:
A orney