HomeMy WebLinkAbout7258 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1982/10/18r
RESOLUTION NO. 7258
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN FRONT YARD SETBACK
FROM SECTION 14-108(1) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO
ZONING TO PERMIT AN ACCESSORY BUILDING WITH AN AREA OF
1,560 SQUARE FEET INSTEAD OF THE MAXIMUM OF 1,000 SQUARE
FEET IN THE R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AT 2001
FLAG AVENUE SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
.\ Findings
1. The Minneapolis Golf Club has applied for a variance from Section 24-108(1)
of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit construction of an accessory building
with an area of 1,560 square feet instead of the maximum of 1,000 square feet for a
an accessory building to house golf carts located in the R-1, Single Family District, at
the following location, to -wit:
Lot 1, Auditors Subdivision #270, except road
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 82 -73 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that the application
be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect on values of property
in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding property,
it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will
not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably
increase the congestion in the public streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the
public safety, unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in
any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question are
peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not apply generally
to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely serve as a convenience
to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance to permit construction of an accessory building with an
area of 1,560 square feet instead of the maximum 1,000 square feet is granted based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council October 18, 1982
Ce&.#1 -C
Ma or
Y
ATTEST:
Reviewed by administration: Approved as to form and legality:
C)c.) (E.?lide."
y Manager
City Attorney
-2-
1