HomeMy WebLinkAbout7161 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1982/06/21r
r
1
RESOLUTION NO. ___.7-1.6 1
A RESOLUTION- GRANTING VARIANCE IN REAR YARD SETBACK OF
16 FEET INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 35 FEET FROM SECTION 14-128(5)
OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PERMIT THE
CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXPANSION IN A SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE IN
THE R-1, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT AT 4440 WEST 25TH STREET
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:.
Findings
1. John W. Bartram has- applied for a variance from Section 14-128(5) of the
Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a rear yard setback of 16 feet instead of
the required 35 feet for a, single family house located in the R-1, Single Family
Residence District, at the following location, to -wit:
Lot 18, Block 1, Cedarwood Second Addition
• 2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 82--36-VAR) and has recommended: to the- City, Council that the application
be granted,
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon- the
health, safety and welfare of. the community, existing and anticipated traffic conditions,
light and air, danger or fire, risk tothe public safety,, the effect on values of property
in the surrounding area, and the effect of the proposed variance_upon the Comprehensive
Plan.
4. Because of conditions: on the subject property and -on the surrounding property,.
it is possible to use ' the, subject property in such a way that the proposed variance will
not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property, unreasonably
increase the congestion, in the public streets, increase the danger of fire,, endanger the
public safety, unreasonably diminish, or impair health,. safety, comfort, morals, or in
any other respect; be- contrary to the intent of the Zoning- Ordinance and the
Comprehensive Plan.
5.. The special, conditions- applying to the structure or land in question are
peculiar' to• such property or' immediately, adjoining property and, do not apply generally
to other land or structures in the district in which such land is located.
6. The. granting, of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment
of a substantial' property -right of the applicant:, It will not merely serve as a convenience
to the applicant but is necessary, to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted based upon the
findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council June 21, 1982
ATTEST:
Reviewed by Administration:
ceti.j,a., A saz‘zeu:cc
Mayor
Approved as to Form and Legality:
2
1
4