HomeMy WebLinkAbout7057 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1982/02/01RESOLUTION NO. 7057
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN FRONT YARD SETBACK FROM
SECTION 14-173(6) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING
TO PERMIT A LANDSCAPED SETBACK OF 2 FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REDUIRED 6 FEET IN TIIE I-1 INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT AT 31'13
LYNN AVENUE SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Juliette Nolan and Gordon -Fleming and Associates have applied for a
variance from Section 14-173(6) of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to
permit a landscaped setback of 2 feet in a front yard instead of the required
six feet for an office warehouse building located in the I-1 Industrial District
at the following location, to -wit:
The South 81.5 feet of Lot 7, Block 1, "Fern Hill"
St. Louis Park, MN
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 81 -119 -VAR) and has reported its action to the City Council.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety,
the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land
is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not
merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council February 1, 1982
C--411.1224:11)2/2“421jMayor
ATTEST:
Reviewed f'o'r administration:
Approved as to form and legality:
City At.•rney
1