HomeMy WebLinkAbout6975 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1981/10/05f
i
RESOLUTION NO.
6975
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN REAR YARD SETBACK FROM
SECTION 14-128(5) OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING
TO PERMIT A REAR YARD SETBACK OF EIGHT FEET INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 35 FEET IN THE R-1, SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT AT
8901 STANLEN ROAD
BE IT RESOLVED BY,the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Saul R. Grouse has applied for a variance from Section 14-128(5) of
the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a rear yard of eight feet
instead of the required 35 feet for a single family house located in the
R-1, Single Family Residence District, at the following location, to -wit:
Lot 14, Block 2, Cedar Knoll Manor Addition according
to the map or plat thereof
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a
variance (Case No. 81 -84 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that
the application be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety,
the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of
the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
a•re peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such
land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable
hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council October 5, 1981
Mayor
ATTEST:
ty
ler
—CirjhV142""1,
Reviewed for administration:f Approved as to form and legality:
121A4:4A.
ty Manager `r City Attorney
-2