HomeMy WebLinkAbout6794 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1981/04/06RESOLUTION NO. 6794
,
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN REAR YARD COVERAGE FROM
SECTION 14-108 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO
PERMIT A GARAGE WITH A REAR YARD COVERAGE OF .282 INSTEAD
OF .25 FOR PROPERTY IN THE R-2 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT AT
4121 SALEM AVENUE SOUTH
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Anita Diane Nelson has applied for a variance from Section 14-108
of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a garage with a rear
yard coverage of .282 instead of .25 for a single family residence located
in the R-2, Single Family District, at the following location, to -wit:
Lot 31, Block 7, Browndale
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a
variance (Case No. 81 -18 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that
the application be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety, and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety,
the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of
the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such land
is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not
merely serve as a convenience to the applicant but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council April 6, 1981
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Reviewed for administration:
cf2Aii:Au.44.8,eAr
,o14i_ez.eJ
Approved as to form and legality:
ty Manager City Attorney
2
1