HomeMy WebLinkAbout6603 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1980/08/04i
RESOLUTION NO. 6603
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN SIDE YARD SETBACK
FROM SECTION 14-133 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING
TO ZONING TO PERMIT A 1 -STORY GARAGE ON THE NORTH
WITH A SIDE YARD SETBACK OF 4 FT. INSTEAD OF THE
REQUIRED 6 FT. IN THE R-2 DISTRICT AT 4114 COLORADO
AVENUE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. William Mozey, Jr. has applied for a variance from Section 14-133
of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a one-story garage with
a side yard on the north of 4 feet for a property located in the R-2 District
at the following location, to -wit:
N. 58 FT. OF LOT 6, BLOCK 11, BROOKSIDE ADD'N
2. The Board of Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 80 -53 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that -the
application be granted.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety,
and the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect
of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be con-
trary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do
not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which such
land is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will
not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to
alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above.
•
Adopted by the City Council August 4, 1980
•Cia4(40&
Mayor
Attest:
Reviewed for administration: Approved as to form and legality:
4,"
Acting City Manager
-2-
1
1