HomeMy WebLinkAbout6557 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1980/05/19I
ii
REPLACEMENT
RESOLUTION NO. 6557
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN FRONT YARD SETBACK
FROM SECTION 14-128 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO
ZONING TO PERMIT A FRONT YARD OF 22.5 FEET INSTEAD OF
REQUIRED 35 FEET IN THE R-1 DISTRICT AT 3310 HILLSBORO
AVENUE
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Linus and Margaret Schmitz have applied for a variance from Section
14-128 of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a front yard of
22.5 feet for a property located in the R-1 District at the following location,
to -wit:
Lot 3, Block 1, Isensee's Addition
2. The Board of Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 80 -31 -VAR) and has recommended to the City Council that the application
be granted.
3. The Council has' considered the effect of the proposed variance upon
the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated
traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public -safety,
the effect on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the
proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the -surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in•which such land
is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and
enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not merely
serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council May 19, 1980
Reviewed for administration:
Acting City Manager
E?4,1fiL YlfgA laina
Mayor
Approv
Gfi
as to form and legality:
City Attorney
1