HomeMy WebLinkAbout6550 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1980/05/05f
i
RESOLUTION NO. 6550
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN SIDE YARDS FROM
SECTION 14-128 OF THE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO
ZONING TO PERMIT SIDE YARDS OF 4.6 FEET AND 6 FEET
INSTEAD OF THE REQUIRED 9 FEET IN THE R-1, SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT AT 4304 W. 28TH STREET
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. Satya Garg and Sohan Uppal have applied for a variance from
Section 14-128 of the Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit
side yards of 4.6 feet and 6 feet instead of the required 9 feet for
a single family residence located in the R-1, Single Family Residence
District at the following location, to -wit:
Rama's Addition Lot 2 Block 1
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for
a variance (Case No. 80 -25 -VAR) and its action has been reported to
the City Council.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance
upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and
anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk
to the public safety, the effect on values of property in the surrounding
area and the effect of the proposed variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that
the proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air
to adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public
streets, increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety,
unreasonably diminish or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in
any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and
the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in
question are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property
and do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district
in which such land is located.
r
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It
will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary
to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
Conclusion
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted,
based upon the findings set forth above.
Adopted by the City Council May 5, 1980.
Reviewed for adfir11-a?
nni tration:
er
Acting City Ma
-2-
Approved• 8 form and legality:
(449PY
i ty jlt orney