HomeMy WebLinkAbout6426 - ADMIN Resolution - City Council - 1979/11/19r
RESOLUTION NO. 6426
A RESOLUTION GRANTING VARIANCE IN SIDE YARD SETBACKS
FROM SECIION 14-133 OF IHE ORDINANCE CODE RELATING TO
ZONING TO PERMIT CONSTRUCTION OF AN EXPANSION RESULT-
ING IN A SOUTH SIDE YARD OF SIX FEET FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED IN THE R-2, SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT, AT 4114
COLORADO AVENUE SOUTH.
BE IT RESOLVED BY the City Council of St. Louis Park, Minnesota:
Findings
1. William Mozey, Jr. has applied for a variance from Section 14-133 of the
Ordinance Code relating to zoning to permit a south side yard of six feet instead
of the required nine feet for a single family house located in the R-2, Single
Family District, at the following location, to -wit:
Lot 5, Block 1, Texatonka Addition
2. The Board of Zoning Appeals has reviewed the application for a variance
(Case No. 79 -83 -VAR) and its action has been reported to the City Council.
3. The Council has considered the effect of the proposed variance upon the
health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and anticipated traffic
conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, the effect
on values of property in the surrounding area and the effect of the proposed
variance upon the Comprehensive Plan.
4. Because of conditions on the subject property and on the surrounding
property, it is possible to use the subject property in such a way that the
proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to
adjacent property, unreasonably increase the congestion in the public streets,
increase the danger of fire, endanger the public safety, unreasonably diminish
or impair health, safety, comfort, morals, or in any other respect be contrary
to the intent of the Zoning Ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan.
5. The special conditions applying to the structure or land in question
are peculiar to such property or immediately adjoining property and do not
apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said land
is located.
6. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant. It will not
merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but is necessary to alleviate
demonstrable hardship or difficulty.
1 : Reviewed for administration:
t
Conclusion
,1
The application for a variance for the purpose designated is granted, based
upon the findings set forth above. 1
Adopted by the City Council November 19, 1979.
ATTEST:
6e
City Clerk
May
Approved as to form and legality:
-2-
City A-orney
,'I
if
I
t